UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549

FORM 10-Q/A-1

(Mark One)
x QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from ___________ to ____________

COMMISSION FILE NO. 0-27160

CALL NOW, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	65-0337175
(State or other jurisdiction of	(IRS Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)

1 Retama Parkway, Selma, TX	78154
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (210) 651-7145

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and, (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (S.232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter time period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

	Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated file o

	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

Registrant had 2,013,877 shares of common stock issued and outstanding as of May 5, 2011.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Financial Statements

CALL NOW, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Balance Sheets

	March 31,			December 31,
	2011			2010
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS

Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	57,809		$	189,340
Accounts receivable, net		777,460			777,460
Marketable securities – related party		3,361,187			2,449,509
Marketable securities – other		3,569,651			3,638,437
Other current assets		288,641			232,007
Total current assets		8,054,748			7,286,753

Furniture, Equipment and Improvements (less accumulated
depreciation of $10,201 and $9,220 respectively)		9,420			10,401

Other Assets:
Marketable securities – Retama Development Corp.		133,000			133,000
Investments		116,279			116,279
Notes and interest receivable – Retama Development Corp.		405,515			409,728
Deferred tax asset		2,125,237			2,048,940
Total other assets		2,780,031			2,707,947

Total Assets	$	10,844,199		$	10,005,101

LIABILITIES AND EQUITY (DEFICIT)

Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		532,043			532,536
Margin loan payable – related party		5,885,286			5,777,021
Deferred taxes payable		184,696			-
Total current liabilities		6,602,025			6,309,557

Long-term Note Payable and Accrued Interest – Related Party, net of current portion		14,841,800			14,508,750

Equity (Deficit):
Call Now Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit):
Preferred stock, $.001 par value; authorized 266,667 shares,
none outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $.001 par value; authorized 16,666,667 shares,
3,327,075 issued and 2,013,877 outstanding		3,327			3,327
Additional paid-in-capital		7,091,120			7,091,120
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,313,198 shares		(14,372,488	)		(14,372,488	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		358,526			(197,783	)
Retained (deficit)		(3,850,226	)		(3,495,497	)
Total Call Now stockholders’ (deficit)		(10,769,741	)		(10,971,321	)
Non-controlling interest		170,115			158,115
Total (deficit)		(10,599,626	)		(10,813,206	)

Total Liabilities and Equity (Deficit)	$	10,844,199		$	10,005,101

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

CALL NOW, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Statements of Operations

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011			2010
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Revenues
Reimbursement of payroll and payroll related expenses	$	983,827		$	1,000,916
Management fees		60,000			60,000
Total Revenues		1,043,827			1,060,916

Expenses
Payroll and payroll related expenses		983,827			1,000,916
Corporate general and administrative operations		205,184			215,328
Total expenses		1,189,011			1,216,244

Net Operating (Loss)		(145,184	)		(155,328	)

Other Income (Expenses)
Interest income – related party		8,806			139,907
Interest income – other		59,020			6,130
Gain on sales of marketable securities – related party		-			2,068,000
Gain on sales of investment – other		-			12,179
Interest expense – related party		(441,316	)		(330,955	)
Total other income (expense), net		(373,490	)		1,895,261

Income (loss) before non-controlling interest and income taxes		(518,674	)		1,739,933

Income tax expense (benefit)		(175,946	)		589,612

Net income (loss) including non-controlling interest		(342,728	)		1,150,321

Less: Net income attributable to non-controlling interest		12,000			12,000

Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Call Now	$	(354,728	)	$	1,138,321

Per Share Data

Basic and diluted income (loss) per share attributed to
Call Now common shareholders	$	(.18	)	$	.40

Weighted average common shares outstanding:
Basic		2,013,877			2,837,317
Dilutive		2,013,877			2,837,317

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

CALL NOW, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011			2010
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Operating Activities
Net income (loss) including non-controlling interest	$	(342,728	)	$	1,150,321
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to
net cash (used) by operating activities:
Net realized (gains) on sales of marketable securities – related party		-			(2,068,000	)
Net realized (gains) on sales of long-term investments – other		-			(12,179	)
Bad debt allowance		60,000			60,000
Deferred income taxes		(175,946	)		589,612
Depreciation		981			981
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Accounts receivable		(60,000	)		(60,000	)
Other current assets		(54,660	)		9,775
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(493	)		(767	)
Net Cash (Used) by Operating Activities		(572,846	)		(330,257	)

Investing Activities
Proceeds from sale of note receivable – Retama Development Corp.		-			5,222,893
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale marketable securities – related party		-			4,480,000
Proceeds from other long-term investments		-			88,880
Purchase of marketable securities		-			(3,950,000	)
Purchase of other long-term investments		-			(155,000	)
Net Cash Provided by Investing Activities		-			5,686,773

Financing Activities
Proceeds from margin loan – related party		108,265			6,211,299
Payments on margin loan – related party		-			(13,936,367	)
Proceeds from long-term debt – related party		333,050			14,053,486
Purchase of treasury stock – related party		-			(11,404,600	)
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Financing Activities		441,315			(5,076,182	)

Net Change in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(131,531	)		280,334

Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		189,340			17,452

Cash and Cash Equivalents at End of Quarter	$	57,809		$	297,786

Supplemental Disclosures
Interest paid in cash	$	108,266		$	199,469
Income tax paid in cash		-			-

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

CALL NOW, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Nature of Business: Call Now, Inc. (the “Company”) was organized under the laws of the State of Florida on September 24, 1990 under the name Rad San, Inc. Its name was changed to Phone One International, Inc. in January 1994 and to Call Now, Inc. in December 1994, and its domicile was changed to the State of Nevada in 1999.

The primary operation of the Company is the management of Retama Park Racetrack (“Retama Park”) in Selma, Texas, through an 80% owned subsidiary, Retama Entertainment Group, Inc. (“REG”). Retama Park is owned by the Retama Development Corporation (the “RDC”). The RDC has an agreement with REG to operate and manage Retama Park until November 1, 2020. The RDC, as owner of the facility, reimburses REG for the majority of payroll and payroll related expenses, plus a monthly management fee.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. In the opinion of management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature considered necessary to present fairly the Company's financial position, results of operations and cash flows for such periods. The accompanying interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any other interim periods or the full fiscal year.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure on contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Principles of Consolidation: The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Call Now, Inc. and its 80% owned subsidiary, Retama Entertainment Group, Inc. (collectively “the Company” or “Call Now”). All significant inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Noncontrolling Interests: The Company accounts for noncontrolling interests (NCIs) in partially owned consolidated subsidiaries as a separate component of equity. Increases and decreases in the parent’s ownership interest that leave control intact are treated as equity transactions, rather than as step acquisitions or dilution gains or losses; and that losses of a partially owned consolidated subsidiary be allocated to the NCI even when such allocation might result in a deficit balance.

Marketable Securities: The Company classifies its marketable security investment portfolio as either held to maturity, available-for-sale, or trading. At March 31, 2011, all of the Company’s marketable securities were available-for-sale. Securities classified as available-for-sale are carried at fair value with unrealized gains and losses included in stockholders’ equity as a component of other comprehensive income. Classification as current or non-current is based primarily on whether there is an active public market for such security.

Other-than-temporary impairments are recognized through earnings if the Company has the intent to sell the security or if it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of our amortized cost basis. Even if the Company does not expect to sell a security, the Company must also evaluate expected cash flows to be received and determine if a credit loss has occurred. In the event of a credit loss, only the amount associated with the credit loss is recognized through earnings. The amount of loss relating to other factors is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income.

Securities that do not trade in an active market are valued based on the best information available to Management. Impairments are reviewed at the end of each reporting period. Gains or losses from the sale or redemption of the marketable securities are determined using the specific identification method.

Valuation of Other Investments: The Company estimates fair value for its other investments based on historical cost and other relevant information. The Company assesses the impairment of the other investments at least annually, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors considered important, which could trigger an impairment review, include the following: significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future cash flows; significant changes in the strategy of the overall business; and significant negative industry trends. When management determines that the carrying value of the other investments may not be recoverable, impairment is measured as the excess of the assets’ carrying value over the estimated fair value.

NOTE 2 – STOCK BASED COMPENSATION

The Company does not have a stock-based compensation plan; however, in past years, certain options have been granted (non-qualified stock options) to its Directors and Officers. The Company does not currently have any unexercised options outstanding.

NOTE 3 – MARGIN LOAN PAYABLE – RELATED PARTY

The Company has a margin loan payable to Penson Financial Services, Inc. (“PFSI”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Penson Worldwide, Inc. (“PWI”), which accrues interest at 7.45% as of March 31, 2011. The balance of the margin loan was $5,885,286 at March 31, 2011 and $5,777,021 at December 31, 2010. The margin loan is collateralized by the Company’s marketable securities. The Company paid interest on the margin loan for the three months ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 of $108,266 and $199,469, respectively.

NOTE 4 – NOTE PAYABLE – RELATED PARTY

On February 25, 2010, the Company entered into a Promissory Note in favor of PWI, in the principal amount of $13,922,000, accumulating interest at a rate of 10% per year with a maturity of the principal and interest on February 25, 2012. On September 16, 2010 the Company borrowed an additional $400,000 from PWI, bringing the balance of the Promissory Note to $14,322,000. The balance of the note at March 31, 2011 is $13,322,000 plus $1,519,800 in accrued interest. The Company has granted PWI a carried interest equal to 20% of the proceeds from its holdings of Retama Development Corp. B Bonds. If the Company repays the Promissory Note prior to the second anniversary of the issuance and there is no default or event of default prior to such repayment, the carried interest will be reduced to 15%. The carried interest entitles the lender to a percentage of all income, principal and other proceeds (in whatever form) from or in respect of the Retama Development Corp. B Bonds of any kind whether on account of interest, redemption of principal, proceeds of sale, pledge or other transfer or disposition of the Bonds, insurance proceeds, tax refunds, or otherwise made or payable in respect of any of the Bonds. The carried interest survives the repayment of the Promissory Note. The Promissory Note is secured by a lien on substantially all of the Company’s assets.

NOTE 5 – INCOME TAXES

During 2004, the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) notified the RDC that it was conducting an examination of the tax-exempt status of the municipal bonds issued in connection with the RDC’s reorganization in 1997. In February 2005, the IRS issued a proposed adverse determination with respect to the RDC’s 1997 Series A and Series B bonds, stating that the interest on the bonds is not excludable from the gross income of their holders. The RDC filed a protest of such determination and requested that the matter be referred to the Office of Appeals of the IRS. In August 2005, the IRS completed an examination of the Company’s tax returns for the years 2000 through 2003. As a result of the examination, the IRS submitted a request for change to include in taxable income the interest earned by the Company on the RDC Series A bonds in the total amount of $588,000.

During the fourth fiscal quarter of 2009, the Company and the law firm that served as legal counsel for the original issuance of the 1997 RDC bonds entered into a Closing Agreement on Final Determination in settlement of issues raised by the IRS in the examination of the 1997 RDC bonds. The terms of the settlement consist of two components: 1.) there shall be a payment made to the IRS in the amount of $773,750. $375,000 of this amount will be paid by the law firm that provided the legal opinion for the 1997 RDC bond issue and will be funded at the time of final execution of the documents by the IRS. The Company will pay the remaining $398,750 over the next three years with $133,750 due on or before July 1, 2010, $135,000 due on or before July 1, 2011 and $130,000 due on or before July 1, 2012; and 2.) 35% of the Series B bonds, or $30,425,000 face amount of the $86,925,000 outstanding, shall be converted to taxable bonds. In favor of the cash contribution to be made by the Company, the majority of the other holders of the Series B bonds agreed to a higher percentage of their bonds to be converted to taxable bonds, resulting in the Company agreeing to convert only $4,897,500, or 11.14%, of the $43,962,500 Series B bonds held by the Company to taxable bonds. The Company received final execution by the IRS of the closing documents in March 2010 and made the first payment of $133,750 in June 2010, per the agreement.

NOTE 6 – EARNINGS PER SHARE ATTRIBUTABLE TO CALL NOW, INC.

Basic earnings per share are computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each year. Diluted earnings per share are computed on the basis of the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive securities outstanding. Dilutive securities having an anti-dilutive effect on diluted earnings per share are excluded from the calculation.

The following reconciles the components of the earnings per share (EPS) computation.

	Income			Shares	Per Share
	(Numerator)			(Denominator)	Amount
Three Months Ended March 31, 2011
Basic EPS:
Net (loss) attributed to Call Now, Inc.	$	(354,728	)	2,013,877	$	(0.18	)
Effect of dilutive options		-		-		-
Dilutive EPS Attributed to Call Now, Inc.	$	(354,728	)	2,013,877	$	(0.18	)

Three Months Ended March 31, 2010
Basic EPS:
Net income attributed to Call Now, Inc.	$	1,138,321		2,837,317	$	0.40
Effect of dilutive options		-		-		-
Dilutive EPS Attributed to Call Now, Inc.	$	1,138,321		2,837,317	$	0.40

NOTE 7 – MARKETABLE SECURITIES

The carrying amounts of marketable securities as shown in the accompanying balance sheets and their approximate market values are as follows at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010:

			Gross		Gross			Carrying/
			Unrealized		Unrealized			Market
March 31, 2011	Cost		Gains		(Losses)			Value
Current Assets, available-for-sale:
PWI common stock, see Note 8 and Note 16	$	2,416,448	$	944,739	$	-		$	3,361,187
Municipal bonds		4,076,574		-		(506,923	)		3,569,651
		6,493,022		944,739		(506,923	)		6,930,838

Non-current Assets, available-for-sale:
RDC Series A bonds		27,594		105,406		-			133,000

Total available-for-sale marketable securities	$	6,520,616	$	1,050,145	$	(506,923	)	$	7,063,838

			Gross		Gross			Carrying/
			Unrealized		Unrealized			Market
December 31, 2010	Cost		Gains		(Losses)			Value
Current Assets, available-for-sale:
PWI common stock, see Note 8 and Note 16	$	2,416,449	$	33,060	$	-		$	2,449,509
Municipal bonds		4,076,575		-		(438,138	)		3,638,437
		6,493,024		33,060		(438,138	)		6,087,946

Non-current Assets, available-for-sale:
RDC Series A bonds		27,594		105,406		-			133,000

Total available-for-sale marketable securities	$	6,520,618	$	138,466	$	(438,138	)	$	6,220,946

Unrealized gains and losses on marketable securities available-for-sale at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are shown net of income taxes as a component of stockholders’ equity.

The Company has several marketable securities in an unrealized loss position at March 31, 2011. The unrealized loss on those securities at March 31, 2011 is $506,923 and the market value is $3,569,651. The Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired. See also Note 16 – Subsequent Events for additional information.

NOTE 8 – MARKETABLE SECURITIES – RELATED PARTY

In February 2010, the Company completed a transaction with the Company’s Chairman and majority shareholder, Christopher J. Hall, where the Company, in part, transferred to Mr. Hall 500,000 shares of Penson Worldwide, Inc. (“PWI”) (Nasdaq:PNSN) common stock valued at $4,480,000, or $8.96 per share. The Company continues to own 500,922 shares of PWI common stock a market value of $3,361,187 at March 31, 2011, based on a closing stock price of $6.71 per share. At December 31, 2010 the Company held 500,922 shares of PWI common stock with a market value of $2,449,509 based on a year-end closing stock price of $4.89 per share. The Company also has a margin loan payable to Penson Financial Services, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Penson Worldwide, Inc., with a balance of $5,885,286 at March 31, 2011 and $5,777,021 at December 31, 2010. The President of Call Now, Inc. is a Director of Penson Worldwide, Inc. See also Note 16 – Subsequent Events for additional information.

In exchange for the shares of PWI transferred to Mr. Hall the Company received, in part, $3,200,000 face amount of Leon County FL Educational Facilities Authority (Southgate Dormitory) Series B, 7.625% due 9/1/28 bonds, valued at $2,080,000 at the time of the exchange, or $.65/$1.00, and $2,200,000 face amount of Cambridge Student Housing Financing Revenue Series C, 9.70% due 11/1/39 bonds, valued at $1,870,000 at the time of the exchange, or $.85/$1.00. Please refer to Note 15 – Related Party Transactions in this form 10-Q for complete details of this transaction.

The Company owns $133,000 face amount of the Retama Development Corporation Special Facilities Revenue bonds, Series A (“Series A Bonds”) at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, which are classified as long-term. The Series A Bonds are secured by a senior lien on the Retama Park racetrack facility. The face amount of the total Series A Bonds outstanding is $6,045,000 at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010.

The Company owns $43,962,500 face amount of the Retama Development Corporation Special Facilities Revenue Series B (“Series B Bonds”) at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The Company’s entire position of Series B bonds have been pledged as collateral for the Promissory Note described in Note 4 – Note Payable – Related Party. The Series B Bonds are secured by the excess cash flow of the Retama Park racetrack facility that is on parity with the $400,000 loaned to the RDC in September 2010 (discussed in Note 10) and is subordinate to the Series A Bonds, the Funding Agreement (also discussed in Note 10) and a new second mortgage loan from a third party lender in the approximate amount of $968,000 in principal and $34,000 in interest at the end of this first quarter. The face amount of the Series B Bonds outstanding is $86,925,000 at March 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010. The Company’s carrying value in the Series B bonds was written down to its cost basis of $1,077,463 in 2004 due to a reclassification of the position from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity and additionally written down to $0 in 2006. See further discussion in Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, Retama Park Racetrack – Series B Bonds below.

NOTE 9 – INVESTMENTS

The Company’s other investments have not incurred any significant changes since December 31, 2010. For more information, see the discussion in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 and under Item 2 - Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this Form 10-Q.

NOTE 10 – NOTES AND INTEREST RECEIVABLE – RETAMA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

As part of the RDC’s bankruptcy and debt refinancing in 1996 and 1997, the Company entered into an agreement with the RDC that required the Company to fund any operating losses of the RDC for a period of up to 2 years (the “Funding Agreement”). As more fully detailed in Note 15 – Related Party Transactions in this Form 10-Q, in March 2010 the Company transferred to Christopher J. Hall, the Company’s Chairman and majority shareholder, the full principal and interest value of the Funding Agreement, valued at $3,627,569 in principal and $1,727,859 in accrued interest, with cash and additional securities in exchange for a portion of two unrelated municipal bond issues and shares of the Company’s stock. Following this transaction, the Company no longer has an interest in the Funding Agreement.

On September 16, 2010 the Company loaned the RDC $400,000 for general operating purposes. The loan carries an interest rate of 8.50% and matures January 1, 2013. In fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 the Company elected to not recognize the interest income from this note due to the financial condition of the RDC. However, on March 3, 2011 the Company received payment of interest on the loan from inception through February 1, 2011. As a result of the payment received, interest was also recognized for the remainder of this fiscal quarter ending March 31, 2011. The loan will continue to be reviewed for impairment on a quarterly basis.

NOTE 11 – INTEREST INCOME RECOGNITION – RETAMA DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

During each accounting period, the Company evaluates whether to recognize accrued interest on the RDC note as income based on several criteria including, but not limited to, the value of the underlying collateral, the financial performance of Retama Park and the payment history of the RDC note and other similarly positioned debt securities. In 2009, the Company recognized the accrued interest on the RDC note as income through September 30, 2009; however, effective October 1, 2009, the Company elected to suspend recognition of interest income due to the continued decline of the financial performance of Retama Park and the lack of timely funding of the Series A Bonds September 1, 2009 interest payment. Following the transaction on February 25, 2010 and further detailed in Note 15 – Related Party Transaction, the Company reversed its decision and recognized the accrued interest on the RDC note from October 1, 2009 through February 25, 2010, when the note was transferred to Christopher J. Hall. As noted above, interest is being recognized on the new $400,000 advance to the RDC, but will be reevaluated on quarterly basis.

NOTE 12 – CONTINGENCY

Investment Company Act
Management has taken the position that the Company is not an investment company required to register under the Investment Company Act of 1940. If it was established that the Company was an unregistered investment company, there would be a risk, among other material adverse consequences, that the Company could become subject to monetary penalties or injunctive relief, or both, in an action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company may also be unable to enforce contracts with third parties or third parties could seek to obtain rescission of transactions undertaken in the period it was established that the Company was an unregistered investment company.

NOTE 13 – COMPREHENSIVE INCOME ATTRIBUTED TO CALL NOW, INC.

Comprehensive income includes all changes in equity during a period except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. The components of comprehensive income are as follows:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2011			2010
Net income (loss) attributed to Call Now, as reported	$	(354,728	)	$	1,138,321

Other comprehensive income (loss):
Change in fair market value of available-for-sale securities		842,892			(3,371,486	)
Income tax effect		(286,583	)		1,146,305

Total comprehensive income (loss) attributed to Call Now	$	201,581		$	(1,086,860	)

NOTE 14 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

ASC topic 820 established a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements).

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy defined by the standard are as follows:
	Level 1:	Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical asset or liabilities;
	Level 2:	Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities that are observable for the asset or liability; or
	Level 3:	Unobservable pricing inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources, such as discounted cash flow models or valuations.

The Company follows the provisions of ASC topic 820-10 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis. As it relates to the Company, this applies to impaired other investments. Impairments are based on expected future cash flows and other considerations. The Company has designated these assets as level 3.

The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels. The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that are accounted for at fair value. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

	March 31, 2011
Recurring Fair Value Measures	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Marketable securities – related party	$	3,361,187	$	-	$	-	$	3,361,187
Marketable securities – other		3,569,651		-		-		3,569,651
Marketable securities – Retama Dev. Corp. – Series A		-		-		133,000		133,000

Liabilities:
None	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-

	December 31, 2010
Recurring Fair Value Measures	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Marketable securities – related party	$	2,449,509	$	-	$	-	$	2,449,509
Marketable securities – other		3,638,437		-		-		3,638,437
Marketable securities – Retama Dev. Corp. – Series A		-		-		133,000		133,000

Liabilities:
None	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-

The Company’s financial instruments relate to its available-for-sale marketable securities, which are valued using quoted market prices. Adjustments to fair value are recorded in other comprehensive income until the investment is sold.

The following table sets forth a reconciliation of changes in the fair market value of financial assets classified as level 3 in the fair value hierarchy.

	Marketable Securities –
	Retama Development Corp.		Total
Balances as of January 1, 2011	$	133,000	$	133,000
Total losses (realized or unrealized):
Included in earnings		-		-
Included in other comprehensive income		-		-
Purchases, issuances and settlements		-		-
Transfers in and out of level 3		-		-
Balance as of March 31, 2011	$	133,000	$	133,000
Change in unrealized gains or losses in earnings (or changes in net
assets) relating to asset still held as of March 31, 2011	$	-	$	-

NOTE 15 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On February 25, 2010, the Company entered into a Promissory Note in favor of PWI, in the principal amount of $13,922,000, accumulating interest at a rate of 10% per year with a maturity of February 25, 2012. In addition, the Company has granted PWI a carried interest equal to 8% of the proceeds from its holdings of Retama Development Corp. B Bonds. If the Company repays the Promissory Note prior to the second anniversary of the issuance and there is no default or event of default prior to such repayment, the carried interest will be reduced to 4%. The carried interest entitles the lender to a percentage of all income, principal and other proceeds (in whatever form) from or in respect of the Retama Development Corp. B Bonds of any kind whether on account of interest, redemption of principal, proceeds of sale, pledge or other transfer or disposition of the Bonds, insurance proceeds, tax refunds, or otherwise made or payable in respect of any of the Bonds. The carried interest survives the repayment of the Promissory Note. The Promissory Note is secured by a lien on substantially all of the Company’s assets.

Simultaneous with the execution of the Promissory Note with PWI, the Company entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement with Christopher Hall, the Company’s majority stockholder, Chairman and a director. Under such agreement, which was approved by the Board of Directors in accordance with the By-laws, the Company purchased from Mr. Hall the following:

898,000 shares of Call Now, Inc. common stock for $11,404,600;

$3,200,000 principal amount of Leon County FL Educational Facilities Authority (Southgate) Series B Bond, 7.625% due 9/1/28 for $2,080,000; and

$2,200,000 principal amount of Cambridge Student Housing Financing Revenue Series C Bond, 9.70% due 11/1/39 for $1,870,000.

In consideration of the foregoing the Company transferred and paid to Mr. Hall the following:

The Retama Development Corporation Funding Agreement with a current principal and interest balance totaling $5,355,428 ($3,627,569 principal + $1,727,859 interest);

500,000 shares of Penson Worldwide, Inc. common stock valued at $4,480,000; and

$5,511,800 in cash.

Additionally, on June 15, 2010 the Company sold 9,973 shares of the Company’s common stock to Mr. Hall for $126,567.

On September 16, 2010 the Company increased the PWI Promissory Note by $400,000 to a total of $14,322,000. The interest rate and maturity of the note remain unchanged except that $400,000 plus interest was due on December 30, 2010, with the balance maintaining the original maturity of February 25, 2012. Repayment of the $400,000 including accrued interest was made on November 12, 2010. Additionally, the terms of PWI carried interest in the Retama Development Corporation Series B bonds have been changed as follows: If the Company irrevocably repays the Promissory Note prior to the second anniversary of the issuance but after the first anniversary, and there is no default or event of default prior to such repayment, the carried interest will be reduced to 15%.

Refer also to Note 3 – Margin Loan Payable – Related Party, Note 8 – Marketable Securities – Related Party and Note 10 – Notes and Interest Receivable – Retama Development Corporation above for additional details pertaining to additional related party relationships.

NOTE 16 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Following the close of the Company’s fiscal first quarter ended March 31, 2011, the value of the Company’s investment in Penson Worldwide, Inc. (Nasdaq: PNSN) dropped from $3,361,187 as of March 31, 2011 to $1,562,877 at the close of business on May 12, 2011 due to a drop in the stock price from $6.71/share to $3.12/share.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Forward Looking Statements

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations may contain forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual results in future periods may differ materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in this report, and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010. Results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any other interim periods or the full fiscal year.

Overview

Call Now, Inc. (the “Company”) was organized under the laws of the State of Florida on September 24, 1990 under the name Rad San, Inc. The Company changed its name to Phone One International, Inc. in January 1994 and to Call Now, Inc. in December 1994. The Company changed its domicile to the state of Nevada in 1999.

Retama Park Racetrack
The Company is primarily engaged in the operation and management of Retama Park, a horse racetrack located in Selma, TX just outside of San Antonio, through our 80% owned subsidiary, Retama Entertainment Group, Inc. (“REG”). REG is responsible for all of the day-to-day operational activities at Retama Park including: live racing; daily simulcasting of other racetracks from around the country; the operation of all food and beverage outlets that include a Turf and Field Club, fine dining, a sports bar and concession stands; all regulatory responsibilities with the Texas Racing Commission; and the pursuit of additional legislation from the Texas Legislature that would be favorable to Retama Park, such as other forms of gaming. Effective January 1, 2010, the management agreement was extended to November 1, 2020.

All personnel at the racetrack are employees of REG, as a result, it is only the payroll costs of the personnel that are reimbursed by the RDC to the Company. REG also receives a $20,000 per month management fee from the RDC. The financial performance of Retama Park is not included in the Company’s financial statements. However, the management fee and the reimbursement of payroll and payroll related expenses are the Company’s only source of revenue at this time, and the loss of this management contract or the inability to collect the management fee and other obligations of the RDC would negatively impact the Company’s revenue and financial condition. While the Company will continue to accrue the management fee, as of October 1, 2009, Company management has determined to take an allowance for bad debt for the fee given payment has not been received by the Company in several years.

The facility and real estate are owned by the Retama Development Corporation (the “RDC”), a municipal subdivision of the city of Selma, TX, and it is encumbered by $6,045,000 Senior Series A Bonds and $86,925,000 Subordinate Series B Bonds. In addition to the management relationship, the Company also maintains a substantial investment in the facility through holdings of a portion of the Retama Development Corporation Special Facilities Revenue Refunding Bonds and an additional loan in the amount of $400,000. (See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 8 – Marketable Securities – Related Party and Note 10 – Notes and Interest Receivable - Retama Development Corporation for additional details.)

In the event of a default on the Series A Bonds, the holders of the bonds could seek to foreclose on the Retama Park racetrack facilities and real estate. We have provided loans to the RDC to support the operations of the racetrack and to meet its interest and sinking fund obligations on its Series A Bonds. We believe it has been in our best interest to help the RDC avoid default of the Series A Bonds as the best strategy to achieve returns on the Series B Bonds in the event additional forms of gaming are approved for Texas racetracks, of which there can be no assurance. Such financial support is entirely at the discretion of the Company and is documented by promissory notes secured by a mortgage on the Retama Park racetrack real estate and facilities which is subordinated only to the RDC Series A Bonds and converted Series B Bonds, if any.

Our strategy is to operate the Retama Park racetrack in order to maintain its status as a Class I racetrack, attract horsemen to its racing meets, provide a satisfactory gaming and entertainment experience for its customers and provide a safe and attractive facility. We are also seeking the legalization of additional forms of gaming at Texas racetracks. We believe that the offering of additional forms of gaming will be required to enable us to achieve a satisfactory return on our holdings of RDC Series B Bonds.

The status of the racing industry in Texas is similar to many other states around the country as Texas racing facilities continue to experience greater competition from those facilities that have been granted the right to conduct additional forms of gaming such as video lottery terminals, slot machines and poker. All states that share a border with Texas - Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma and New Mexico – currently allow additional forms of gaming at their racetracks. The benefits of additional gaming for racing facilities located in these states are two-fold. First, the operation of this additional gaming has provided these facilities with a new, and typically highly profitable, business line. Second, additional gaming has also provided supplemental funds for the horse purses (the prize money paid) within the state. These higher purses have attracted higher quality horses, which tend to be more attractive to the betting public.

We have been actively pursuing the legalization of additional gaming at Texas racetracks a coalition of Texas racetracks that includes the other two Class I tracks, Lone Star Park and Sam Houston Race Park. If the legalization of additional forms of gaming is approved at Texas racetracks, it is anticipated that the profit from this operation would provide sufficient cash flow to enable both the Series A and Series B bonds to be repaid. However, there can be no assurance that the Texas legislature and governor will approve such additional gaming and, if approved, whether the structure and taxation on such additional gaming would benefit the Company. There is substantial opposition to expanding gaming operations in Texas and at this time, no legislation has moved forward in the current legislative session. Retama Park is experiencing strong competition from other gaming alternatives from the on-line gaming and surrounding states with other forms of gaming, as well as from other entertainment venues in its market area. We expect these factors to continue to adversely affect the liquidity of REG in the absence of legislation allowing additional gaming.

The legalization of gaming in Texas remains uncertain in both the likelihood and timeframe. The alternative available to the Company as a majority Series B bondholder would be to develop a plan with the Series A bondholders and the RDC that would maximize the value of the underlying collateral real estate through a liquidation or a joint venture redevelopment with a third party.

Retama Park Racetrack – Series B Bonds
In 2004, in accordance with ASC topic 320, the Company reclassified the Series B bonds from available-for-sale to held-to-maturity, resulting in a write down of the bonds value from market to their original cost basis of $1,077,463. In accordance with ASC topic 320, the Company fully impaired the Series B Bonds in 2006 based on the limited available market, the uncertainty of principal or interest payments to be made in the foreseeable future and the subordinated lien on the collateral. Despite the accounting treatment of the Series B bonds, the Company believes that these bonds maintain an intrinsic value based on an assessment of the underlying security of the investment. Specifically, based on an appraisal of the real estate by an independent, third party appraisal company that was updated in the third quarter of fiscal year 2010, there is value in the real estate available to the Series B bonds in excess of the current priority debt obligations. Additionally, the bonds are secured by an assignment of one-half (50%) of the Enhancements of the racing license for Retama Park. Enhancements are defined as any right, benefit or entitlement arising under the license, such as additional gaming rights that would allow the operation of a casino-type facility, that has not been assigned to Retama Development Corporation to conduct horse racing and simulcasting. While an assessment of the value of 50% of the Enhancements is much more subjective in nature, it is worth noting that the other Class 1 racetracks in Texas have announced capital acquisitions of all or a portion of their operation by nationally recognized casino companies – Lone Star Park in Grand Prairie with Global Gaming Solutions, LLC and Sam Houston Race Park in Houston with Penn National Gaming, Inc.

Penson Worldwide, Inc.
On June 26, 2003 the Company entered into a “Convertible Promissory Note and Purchase Agreement” with Penson Worldwide, Inc. (“PWI”) to lend $6,000,000 with the note maturing on June 26, 2008 (the “PWI Note”). PWI is a related party to the Company as Thomas R. Johnson, President and CEO of Call Now, Inc. is also a member of the Board of Directors of both. On December 23, 2003 an additional $600,000 was loaned to PWI under similar terms and conditions as the original note. On June 30, 2005, the Company converted the entire $6,600,000 principal balance of the PWI Note into 3,283,582 shares of PWI common stock.

On May 16, 2006, PWI completed the Initial Public Offering (“IPO”) of their common stock (Nasdaq: PNSN). In a simultaneous transaction, PWI affected a 1-for-2.4 share reverse split and the split-off of certain non-core business operations known as SAMCO. As part of the IPO, the Company elected to participate in the exchange of PWI shares for SAMCO shares and sell a total of 11.5% of its investment, or 157,337 shares, of the PWI shares in the IPO resulting in a pre-tax gain on the sale of $1,728,504. Following the completion of the PWI IPO, the Company’s resulting position is as follows: 79,900 shares of SAMCO which represents an approximate 7.29% interest in the company; and 1,130,922 shares of the publicly traded PWI common stock. In August 2008, the Company sold 30,000 shares of PWI common stock, leaving a balance of 1,100,922. In August 2009, the Company sold 100,000 shares of PWI common stock, leaving a balance of 1,000,922. In March 2010, the Company transferred to Christopher J. Hall, the Company’s Chairman and majority shareholder, 500,000 shares of PWI common stock in exchange for certain municipal bonds and Company common stock. (See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 15 – Related Party Transactions for additional details.) Following this transaction, the Company owns 500,922 shares of PWI common stock, which represents an approximate 1.76% ownership interest as of March 31, 2011. As of March 31, 2011 the recognized other comprehensive income from the increase in value of the PWI common stock was approximately $945,000. Following the close of the Company’s fiscal first quarter ended March 31, 2011, the value of the Company’s investment in PWI dropped from $3,361,187 as of March 31, 2011 to $1,562,877 at the close of business on May 12, 2011 due to a drop in the stock price from $6.71/share to $3.12/share.

The Company has a margin loan payable to Penson Financial Services, Inc. (“PFSI”), a wholly owned subsidiary of Penson Worldwide, Inc. (“PWI”). In September 2009 PFSI determined that, for margin account purposes due to, among other reasons, the lack of trading activity in the Retama Development Corporation Series B bonds, it should require a 100% margin requirement, effectively making these bonds non-marginable. As a result, the Company received a margin call letter on September 28, 2009 from PFSI notifying the Company that it needed to deposit $5,300,000 in additional cash or margin collateral into its margin loan account by September 30, 2009. The Company did not make the requested deposit by September 30, 2009, nor did the Company make any additional deposits into the margin account for the remainder of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009. In February 2010 the Company entered into a Promissory Note in favor of PWI (the “PWI Note”) in the principal amount of $13,922,000, the proceeds of which were used to satisfy the Company’s margin requirement. On September 16, 2010 the Company borrowed an additional $400,000 against the PWI Note, bringing the balance to $14,322,000.

The PWI Note accumulates interest at a rate of 10% per year with a maturity of February 25, 2012. In addition, the Company has granted PWI a carried interest equal to 20% of the proceeds from its holdings of Retama Development Corp. B Bonds. If the Company irrevocably repays the Promissory Note prior to the second anniversary of the issuance but after the first anniversary, and there is no default or event of default prior to such repayment, the carried interest will be reduced to 15%. The carried interest percentages were adjusted from 8%, 4% and 0%, respectively, as an additional term of the $400,000 loan by PWI on September 16, 2010. The carried interest entitles the lender to a percentage of all income, principal and other proceeds (in whatever form) from or in respect of the Retama Development Corp. B Bonds of any kind whether on account of interest, redemption of principal, proceeds of sale, pledge or other transfer or disposition of the Bonds, insurance proceeds, tax refunds, or otherwise made or payable in respect of any of the Bonds. The carried interest survives the repayment of the Promissory Note. The Promissory Note is secured by a lien on substantially all of the Company’s assets.

The Cambridge at Auburn
On December 11, 2006 the Company entered into a partnership agreement to provide ninety-five percent (95%) of the equity for the acquisition and rehabilitation of a 156-unit, 312-bed full service, private dormitory located in Auburn, Alabama, immediately adjacent to the campus of Auburn University. The project is now known as The Cambridge at Auburn (“The Cambridge”). The Company is the sole limited partner of Cambridge at Auburn, LP (“CA, LP”). The general partner of CA, LP is an unrelated real estate developer. As the limited partner, the Company is entitled to receive a preferred return of its capital contribution plus a ten percent (10%) per annum cumulative return, compounded monthly. Following the repayment of the preferred return on the capital contribution, excess cash, at the discretion of the general partner, as well as refinancing or disposition proceeds shall be paid fifty percent (50%) to the general partner and fifty percent (50%) to the limited partner. Through September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company’s investment totaled approximately $1.296 million and $1.081 million, respectively. Due to a significant number of dormitory units constructed by Auburn University that were completed just prior to the 2009-2010 school year, occupancy at The Cambridge suffered a significant decline, with current occupancy at approximately 26%. While it was anticipated that the decline in occupancy was a temporary issue during the absorption of the new dorms in the market, leasing for the 2010-2011 school did not rebound as much as anticipated, reaching approximately 65%. Additionally, due to a lack of available cash, the Company as limited partner was also unable to continue to fund operating losses and debt service payments during this fiscal quarter. As a result, the first mortgage lender for the property has engaged a receiver to operate the property. We have not been informed of the commencement of any foreclosure proceedings at the time, but the lender continues to reserve their rights to take any action they deem necessary. Due to the current status of the property, the Company fully impaired its investment in this project, resulting in a charge to earnings of $1.3 million in the fiscal third quarter ended September 30, 2010.

TNO Holdings, LLC
During the course of 2007, the Company provided financing to TNO Holdings, LLC (“TNOH”), a Florida limited liability company, totaling approximately $811,000. TNOH owned three municipal bond issues secured by a first mortgage lien on five long-term care facilities located in Oklahoma and Texas. The purpose of the loan from the Company was to provide working capital for the facilities and fund various capital improvements. The loan accrued interest at a rate of 9.50% and compounded monthly. Following discussions with the managing member of TNOH, the Company has agreed to convert the loan to an approximately 42% equity interest in TNOH. During the fourth fiscal quarter of 2007 for the Company, the two nursing homes located in Texas were sold to a third party and the net sales proceeds were used to redeem a portion of the municipal bond issue secured by the facilities and owned by TNO Holdings. The subsequent distribution to the members of TNOH resulted in the repayment of substantially all of the funds originally loaned to TNOH by the Company plus an additional return. The Company continues to maintain an equity interest in TNOH. TNOH continues to own two Oklahoma municipal bond issues secured by three nursing home facilities.

Critical Accounting Policies

General
Management’s discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to the reported amounts of revenues and expenses and the valuation of our assets, income taxes, and contingencies. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions, as well as reliance on independent appraiser reports on the valuation of certain of our debt securities. We believe our estimates and assumptions to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, actual results could differ form those estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Valuation of Marketable Securities
Investments in publicly traded equity securities are generally based on quoted market prices. Investments in the RDC Series A and B bonds represent debt securities and there is no readily available quoted market price, as these securities are owned by a limited number of holders. The Series A bonds have been valued at $133,000, which represents the pro rata share of the underlying value of the collateral (the Retama Park horse track facility). The Company has fully impaired the Series B bonds based on the limited available market, the uncertainty of principal or interest payments and the subordinate lien on the collateral.

Valuation of Penson Worldwide, Inc. Common Stock
The Penson Worldwide, Inc. (“PWI”) (Nasdaq: PNSN) common stock is valued at the market value of the shares held by the Company at the close of business on March 31, 2011, the last trading day of the fiscal quarter. Based on a closing price of $6.71 per share and a position of 500,922 shares, the Company’s holdings of PWI common stock is valued at $3,361,187. The Company held 500,922 shares of PWI common stock as of December 31, 2010 and the holdings were valued at $2,449,509 at that time, based on a closing price of $4.89 per share. Following the close of the Company’s fiscal first quarter ended March 31, 2011, the value of the Company’s investment in PWI dropped from $3,361,187 as of March 31, 2011 to $1,562,877 at the close of business on May 12, 2011 due to a drop in the stock price from $6.71/share to $3.12/share.

Notes and Interest Receivable – Retama Development Corporation
The Company has provided advances to the RDC primarily to meet the RDC’s interest and sinking fund obligations on its Series A Bonds. Such advances are entirely at the discretion of the Company and are documented by promissory notes secured by a second lien mortgage on the Retama Park racetrack real estate and facilities, which is subordinated to the RDC Series A Bonds and Converted Series B Bonds, if any. We estimate at the end of each reporting period the valuation and collectibility of the RDC note and any interest that has been recognized as income, and report the total amount as other assets in our consolidated balance sheet. As more fully detailed in Note 15 – Related Party Transactions of the unaudited financial statements for the period ending March 31, 2011, in February 2010 the Company transferred to Christopher J. Hall, the Company’s Chairman and majority shareholder the full principal and interest value of the Funding Agreement, valued at $3,627,569 in principal and $1,727,859 in interest, with cash and additional securities in exchange for a portion of two unrelated municipal bond issues and shares of the Company’s stock. Following this transaction, the Company no longer has an interest in the Funding Agreement.

Valuation of Other Investments
The Company estimates fair value for its other investments based on historical cost and other relevant information. The Company assesses the impairment of the other investments at least annually, and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors considered important, which could trigger an impairment review, include the following: significant underperformance relative to historical or projected future cash flows; significant changes in the strategy of the overall business; and significant negative industry trends. When management determines that the carrying value of the other investments may not be recoverable, impairment is measured as the excess of the assets’ carrying value over the estimated fair value. The Company did not record any impairment losses during this quarter ended March 31, 2011.

Interest Income Recognition – Retama Development Corporation
During each accounting period, the Company evaluates whether to continue to recognize the accrued interest on the RDC note as income based on several criteria including, but not limited to, the value of the underlying collateral, the financial performance of Retama Park and the payment history of the RDC note and other similarly positioned debt securities. In 2009, the Company recognized the accrued interest on the RDC note as income through September 30, 2009; however, as of October 1, 2009, the Company elected to suspend further recognition of interest income until events and circumstances dictated otherwise. Due to the continued decline of the financial performance of Retama Park and the lack of timely funding of the Series A Bonds September 1, 2009 interest payment, the Company deemed it appropriate to suspend the income recognition of the interest on the RDC note commencing October 1, 2009. Following the transaction further detailed in Note 15 – Related Party Transactions in this Form 10-Q, the Company has recognized the accrued interest on the RDC note from October 1, 2009 through February 25, 2010, when the note was transferred to Christopher J. Hall.

Income Taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded based on the difference between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their carrying amount for financial reporting purposes, as measured by the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.

The Company follows ASC topic 740, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes”, which defines the confidence level that a tax position must meet in order to be recognized in the financial statements. This standard requires a two-step approach under which the tax effect of a position is recognized only if it is “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained and the amount of tax benefit recognized is equal to the largest tax benefit that is greater than 50 percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement of the tax position. This standard also requires that the amount of interest expense to be recognized related to uncertain tax positions be computed by applying the applicable statutory rate of interest to the difference between the tax position recognized in accordance with this standard and the amount previously taken or expected to be taken in a tax return.

Risk Factors

In addition to the other information set forth in this quarterly report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results.

THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2011 COMPARED TO MARCH 31, 2010

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

a. Revenues and Other Income

Revenue

The Company's revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $1,043,827, compared to $1,060,916 for the three months March 31, 2010. Retama Entertainment Group, Inc. (“REG”), an 80% owned subsidiary of the Company, is engaged as the management company of the Retama Park racetrack located in Selma, TX. The owner of the facility, the Retama Development Corporation (the “RDC”), reimburses REG for the majority of payroll and payroll related expenses, plus a monthly management fee of $20,000. It is important to note that the financial performance of Retama Park does not directly impact and is not included in the Company’s financial statements. As a result of this arrangement, the majority of the Company’s revenue consists of the reimbursement of REG’s payroll expenses. Therefore, the similarity in revenue for the three months ended March 31, 2011 as compared to the three months ended March 31, 2010, reflects similar staffing levels at Retama Park for the comparable periods.

Interest Income

Interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $67,826, compared to $146,037 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. As further detailed in Note 15 – Related Party Transactions in this Form 10-Q, the Company exchanged the RDC Funding Agreement for interest bearing municipal bonds. The decline in interest income is attributed to one of the municipal bonds accepted in exchange for the Funding Agreement currently does not pay interest, and therefore, interest is not accrued.

b. Expenses

Cost and Other Expenses of Revenues

Operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2011 was $1,189,011 compared to $1,216,244 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. Expenses have remained consistent for the current quarter as compared to the year ago quarter due to similar staffing levels at Retama Park and operating expenses of the Company. While the Company will continue to accrue the $20,000 monthly management fee, as of October 1, 2009, Company management has determined to take an allowance for bad debt for the fee given payment has not been received by the Company in several years.

Income Tax

The Company recognized a federal income tax benefit for the three months ended March 31, 2011 of $175,946 compared to a federal income tax expense of $589,612 for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The Company’s total federal income tax does not approximate the expected corporate tax rate due primarily to non-taxable municipal bond interest income. The income tax benefit for the three months ended March 31, 2011 reflects the Company’s operating loss during the time period. The income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 reflects the capital gain realized in the exchange of 500,000 shares of Penson Worldwide, Inc. as part of the transaction detailed in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 15 – Related Party Transactions above.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

During the three months ended March 31, 2011, the Company's operating activities used cash of $572,846 compared to $330,257 cash used for the three months ended March 31, 2010. The increase in cash used is largely attributed to greater capital gains realized on the sale of marketable securities the first quarter of 2010 as compared to the first quarter of 2011.

The Company maintains an investment account that utilizes a margin loan collateralized by the Company’s marketable securities. Typically, the Company had the ability to borrow up to 75% of the value of the securities held as collateral in the margin account and has utilized this borrowing availability to provide operating liquidity. In September 2009 PFSI determined that, for margin account purposes due to, among other reasons, the lack of trading activity, the Retama Development Corporation Series B Bonds should require a 100% margin requirement, effectively making these bonds non-marginable. Although the Company has successfully restructured this margin account (see Note 15 – Related Party Transactions), the Company’s margin loan availability remains constrained. See below for a comparison of the margin loan availability as of December 31, 2010 as compared to March 31, 2011.

	As of December 31, 2010			As of March 31, 2011
Margin value of Retama Series B Bonds	$	-		$	-
Margin value of all other marketable securities	$	6,130,097		$	6,971,759
Total margin value of marketable securities	$	6,130,097		$	6,971,759

Maximum loan based on 75% loan-to-value	$	4,597,573		$	5,228,819
Margin loan outstanding	$	5,777,021		$	5,885,286
Margin loan availability (call)	$	(1,179,448	)	$	(656,467	)

Following the close of the Company’s fiscal first quarter ended March 31, 2011, the value of the Company’s investment in PWI dropped from $3,361,187 as of March 31, 2011 to $1,562,877 at the close of business on May 12, 2011 due to a drop in the stock price from $6.71/share to $3.12/share. In response to the Company’s continued operating losses and current constriction of borrowing availability under its margin account, the Company is pursuing solutions including assessing the sale of certain assets and marketable securities in order to provide additional liquidity, such as the sale of the Estates at Canyon Ridge in November 2010.

In the past the Company has provided loans to the RDC but has had no obligation to do so since 1999. These loans were provided to support the continued operation of Retama Park as a Class I racetrack while pursuing the approval of additional forms of gaming at Texas racetracks. We anticipate that the profits from additional gaming operations at Retama Park, if approved, would provide sufficient cash flow to the RDC to enable the Series B Bonds to receive substantial payments. We believe our holdings of RDC Series A Bonds in the amount of $133,000 are fully secured by the collateral security in the Retama Park facilities and real estate and would be repaid even if the operations of Retama Park racetrack were terminated. It should also be noted that the loans provided to the RDC have historically been funded from draws against our margin accounts. Given the current status of our margin account as detailed above and our limited ability to derive liquidity, it seems unlikely that the Company will be able to provide additional funding from draws on the margin account in the foreseeable future unless we are successful in liquidating other assets of the Company.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

We currently have no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

EFFECT OF NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

There are no recently issued accounting pronouncements which we believe will have a material impact on our financial position.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Because we are a smaller reporting company, this Item is not applicable to us.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2011 are effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assurance that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management. Our disclosure controls and procedures include components of our internal control over financial reporting. Management’s assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is expressed at the level of reasonable assurance that the control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

	Not Applicable.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

	Because we are a smaller reporting company, this Item is not applicable to us.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

	Not Applicable.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

	Not Applicable.

ITEM 4. RESERVED

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

	Not Applicable.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

	The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:

	Exhibit No.		Title of Document
	31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	32.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Call Now, Inc.

/s/ Thomas R. Johnson
Thomas R. Johnson
Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer
August 11, 2011

CALL NOW INC 10-Q/A