Securities and Exchange Commission

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarter ended June 30, 2005

Commission file number 000-30571

ARDEN REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Maryland		95-4599813
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

11601 Wilshire Boulevard,
4th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90025-1740
(Address and zip code of principal executive offices)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (310) 966-2600

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

As of August 5, 2005, there were 68,722,996 shares of the registrant’s common operating partnership units issued and outstanding.

ARDEN REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS


			PAGE NO.
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Financial Statements

		Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2005 (unaudited) and December 31, 2004		3

		Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 (unaudited)		4

		Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 (unaudited)		5

		Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		6

	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		12

	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk		30

	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures		31


PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings		32

	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		32

	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		32

	Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		32

	Item 5.	Other Information		32

	Item 6.	Exhibits		33


	SIGNATURES			34
Exhibit 31.1
Exhibit 31.2
Exhibit 32.1
Exhibit 32.2

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Arden Realty Limited Partnership
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except per share data)


	June 30,			December 31,
	2005			2004
	(unaudited)
Assets
Investment in real estate:
Land	$	490,218		$	432,291
Buildings and improvements		2,384,612			2,097,058
Tenant improvements and leasing commissions		380,154			347,640

		3,254,984			2,876,989
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization		(514,885	)		(468,716	)

		2,740,099			2,408,273

Properties under renovation		—			16,295
Land available for development		23,795			23,795
Properties held for disposition, net		85,434			103,618

Net investment in real estate		2,849,328			2,551,981

Cash and cash equivalents		12,934			13,040
Restricted cash		13,449			14,788
Rent and other receivables, net of allowance of $4,211 and $3,748 at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively		7,657			5,953
Deferred rent, net of allowance of $1,866 and $1,933 at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively		40,626			42,886
Prepaid financing costs, expenses and other assets, net of accumulated amortization of $10,827 and $13,244 at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively		17,187			31,349

Total assets	$	2,941,181		$	2,659,997


Liabilities
Mortgage loans payable	$	424,910		$	371,548
Mortgage loans payable — properties held for disposition		3,845			11,091
Unsecured lines of credit		296,000			121,500
Unsecured term loan		125,000			125,000
Unsecured senior notes, net of discount		794,161			696,945
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		53,666			58,215
Security deposits		26,209			25,498

Total liabilities		1,723,791			1,409,797

Minority interest		3,061			2,903

Partners’ Capital
General and limited partners, 68,722,996 and 67,997,458 common OP Units outstanding at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively		1,232,511			1,264,177
Deferred compensation		(11,169	)		(12,830	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(7,013	)		(4,050	)

Total partners’ capital		1,214,329			1,247,297

Total liabilities and partners’ capital	$	2,941,181		$	2,659,997

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Arden Realty Limited Partnership
Consolidated Statements of Income
(in thousands, except per share data)
(unaudited)


	For the Three Months Ended				For the Six Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	2005		2004		2005			2004
Property revenues	$	109,728	$	96,296	$	212,989		$	191,718
Property operating expenses		36,945		31,152		71,011			62,140

		72,783		65,144		141,978			129,578

General and administrative expense		7,560		4,665		15,805			9,149
Interest expense		24,913		20,931		47,839			43,989
Depreciation and amortization		35,880		28,617		66,893			56,043
Interest and other loss (income)		893		435		1,144			(330	)
Impairment on investment in securities		—		2,700		—			2,700
Minority interest		104		47		158			61

Income from continuing operations		3,433		7,749		10,139			17,966

Discontinued operations		2,862		2,240		3,878			6,009
Gain on sale of discontinued properties		4,319		400		6,376			6,829
Loss from debt defeasance related to sale of discontinued property		—		—		(557	)		—

Net income	$	10,614	$	10,389	$	19,836		$	30,804


Net income allocated to:
Preferred partner	$	—	$	1,078	$	—		$	2,156

General and limited partner	$	10,614	$	9,311	$	19,836		$	28,648


Basic net income per common operating partnership unit:
Income from continuing operations	$	0.05	$	0.10	$	0.15		$	0.24
Income from discontinued operations		0.11		0.04		0.14			0.19

Net income per common operating partnership unit — basic	$	0.16	$	0.14	$	0.29		$	0.43


Weighted average number of common operating partnership unit — basic		68,302		67,136		68,142			66,816


Diluted net income per common operating partnership unit:
Income from continuing operations	$	0.05	$	0.10	$	0.15		$	0.24
Income from discontinued operations		0.10		0.04		0.14			0.19

Net income per common operating partnership unit — diluted	$	0.15	$	0.14	$	0.29		$	0.43


Weighted average number of common operating partnership units — diluted		68,638		67,430		68,473			67,173


Distributions per common operating partnership unit	$	0.505	$	0.505	$	1.01		$	1.01

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Arden Realty Limited Partnership
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
(unaudited)


	For the Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2005			2004
Operating Activities:
Net income	$	19,836		$	30,804
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Minority interest		158			61
Gain on sale of discontinued properties		(6,376	)		(6,829	)
Impairment on investment in securities		—			2,700
Depreciation and amortization, including discontinued operations		68,138			62,319
Amortization of loan costs		1,718			2,083
Non-cash compensation expense		2,212			1,531
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Rent and other receivables		(1,704	)		(1,834	)
Deferred rent		(2,336	)		(1,982	)
Prepaid financing costs, expenses and other assets		262			(2,205	)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(3,703	)		(4,911	)
Security deposits		864			876

Net cash provided by operating activities		79,069			82,613


Investing Activities:
Acquisitions and improvements to commercial properties		(307,132	)		(47,367	)
Proceeds from sale of properties		24,943			68,284

Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(282,189	)		20,917


Financing Activities:
Repayments of mortgage loans		(11,123	)		(178,197	)
Proceeds from unsecured lines of credit		323,500			244,000
Repayments of unsecured lines of credit		(149,000	)		(123,000	)
Proceeds from issuance of unsecured senior notes, net of discount and other issuance costs		293,216			—
Repayment of unsecured senior notes		(200,000	)		—
Proceeds from issuance of common operating partnership units		14,571			22,391
Termination of fair value hedges		(466	)		—
Distributions to preferred operating partnership unit holders		—			(2,156	)
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash		1,339			6,039
Distributions to minority interests		(134	)		(78	)
Distributions and redemptions paid to common operating partnership unit holders		(68,889	)		(67,312	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		203,014			(98,313	)

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(106	)		5,217
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		13,040			4,707

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	12,934		$	9,924


Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the period for interest, net of amounts capitalized	$	47,095		$	44,069

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Arden Realty Limited Partnership
Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements
June 30, 2005
(unaudited)

1. Organization and Basis of Presentation

Organization

The terms “us”, “we” and “our” as used in this report refer to Arden Realty Limited Partnership. The term “Arden Realty” refers to Arden Realty, Inc.

We are an operating partnership that owns, manages, leases, develops, renovates and acquires commercial properties located in Southern California. Arden Realty, a real estate investment trust, or REIT, is our sole general partner and, as of June 30, 2005, owned approximately 97.5% of our common operating partnership units, or common OP Units. Arden Realty conducts substantially all of its operations through us and our subsidiaries. Commencing with its taxable year ended December 31, 1996, Arden Realty has operated and qualified as a REIT for federal income tax purposes.

As of June 30, 2005, our portfolio was comprised of 121 primarily suburban office properties, consisting of 198 buildings with approximately 19.2 million net rentable square feet, including six properties and eight buildings currently held for disposition. As of June 30, 2005, our operating portfolio was 90.8% occupied excluding the six properties currently held for disposition. Including these properties, our portfolio was 90.5% occupied.

Arden Realty’s interest in us entitles it to share in our cash distributions, and in our profits and losses in proportion to its percentage ownership. Certain individuals and entities own our remaining common OP Units, including Messrs. Ziman and Coleman, Arden Realty’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and President and Chief Operating Officer, respectively, together with other entities and persons. Each limited partner holding common OP Units is entitled to cause us to redeem the limited partner’s common OP Units for cash. We may, however, elect to exchange those common OP Units for shares of Arden Realty’s common stock on a one-for-one basis, subject to certain limitations instead of paying cash. With each redemption or exchange of common OP Units, Arden Realty’s percentage interest in us will increase.

As our sole general partner, Arden Realty generally has the exclusive power under our partnership agreement to manage us and conduct our business, subject to limited exceptions. Arden Realty’s board of directors manages our affairs. Our existence as a limited partnership cannot be terminated until 2096 without the approval of a majority of our partners or in connection with the sale of all or substantially all of our assets, a business combination, a judicial decree or the redemption of all the common OP Units held by our limited partners.

We are a Maryland limited partnership. Arden Realty is a Maryland corporation. Arden Realty’s common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “ARI.”

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Arden Realty, us and our subsidiaries. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

We consolidate all entities for which we have controlling financial interest as measured by a majority of the voting interest. For entities in which the controlling financial interest is not clearly indicated by ownership of a majority of the voting interest, we would consolidate those entities that we control by agreement. We would also consolidate all variable interest entities for which we were the primary beneficiary.

We and Arden Realty currently own 100% of all of our consolidated subsidiaries and we do not have any unconsolidated investments.

Interim Financial Data

The accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The accompanying financial information reflects all adjustments, which are, in our opinion, of a normal recurring nature and necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods. Interim results of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts on our consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of income have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation for properties sold or classified as “held for disposition” as of June 30, 2005.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement 123 (revised), “Share-Based Payment” (“FAS 123(R)”). FAS 123(R) requires that all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are to be recognized in the income statement based on their fair values. The new standard will be effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material effect on our results of operations or financial condition.

2. Commercial Properties

Property Dispositions

Gross Sales

Square

Price

Property

County

Submarket

Date of Sale

Property Type

Feet

($000’s)

Activity Business Center

San Diego

Miramar

January 5, 2005

Office

167,170

16,650

5832 Bolsa

Orange

West County

June 29, 2005

Office

49,355

8,670

216,525

25,320

Property Acquisitions

Gross

Acquisition

Date of

Square

Price

Property

County

Submarket

Acquisition

Property Type

Feet

($000’s)

707 Broadway

San Diego

Downtown

January 5, 2005

Office

169,536

48,000

⁽¹⁾

Arden Towers at Sorrento

San Diego

Sorrento Mesa

March 22, 2005

Office/Retail

608,253

185,000

5670 Wilshire Boulevard

Los Angeles

Miracle Mile

April 8, 2005

Office

409,118

92,650

⁽²⁾

1,186,907

325,650


(1)		Approximately $2.0 million of the acquisition price was funded through the issuance of 54,950 common operating partnership units at an average price of $37.27.

(2)		The acquisition price for 5670 Wilshire Boulevard includes the assumption of a $51.5 million mortgage loan payable secured by the property.

We expect to finalize our purchase price allocations to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed after our valuation procedures are completed, but no later than one year from the date of purchase. Current estimates of the values of the leases acquired are included in the deferred rent line item of our consolidated balance sheets.

3. Discontinued Operations and Properties Held for Disposition

Since the beginning of 2004, we have sold a total of fourteen properties and have classified as “held for disposition” an additional six properties totaling approximately 800,000 square feet as of June 30, 2005. The results of operations classified as discontinued operations for these properties for the three and six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 are as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Revenues from rental operations	$	4,604		$	9,103		$	8,470		$	19,902
Property expenses		(1,644	)		(3,240	)		(3,158	)		(7,109	)
Depreciation and amortization		(11	)		(3,370	)		(1,245	)		(6,276	)
Interest expense		(87	)		(253	)		(189	)		(508	)

Discontinued operations	$	2,862		$	2,240		$	3,878		$	6,009


Gain on sale of discontinued properties	$	4,319		$	400		$	6,376		$	6,829

Loss from debt defeasance related to sale of discontinued property	$	—		$	—		$	(557	)	$	—

4. Outstanding Indebtedness

A summary of our outstanding indebtedness as of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004 is as follows:


					Annual				Number of
	June 30,		December 31,		Interest Rate at			Rate	Properties
Type of Debt	2005		2004		June 30, 2005			Fixed/Floating	Securing Loan		Maturity
	(in thousands)
Mortgage Loans Payable:
Mortgage Financing III⁽¹⁾	$	131,315	$	132,323		6.74	%	Fixed		21		4/08
Mortgage Financing IV⁽¹⁾		107,392		108,194		6.61	%	Fixed		12		4/08
Mortgage Financing V⁽¹⁾		102,221		103,504		6.94	%	Fixed		12		4/09
Mortgage Financing VI⁽¹⁾		21,208		21,325		7.54	%	Fixed		3		4/09
5670 Wilshire^{(1), (2)}		56,752		—		5.02	%	Fixed		1		9/28
Activity Business Center^{(1), (3)}		—		7,222		—		Fixed		1		—
145 South Fairfax⁽¹⁾		3,845		3,869		8.93	%	Fixed		1		1/27
Marin Corporate Center⁽¹⁾		2,511		2,585		9.00	%	Fixed		1		7/15
Conejo Business Center⁽¹⁾		2,458		2,531		8.75	%	Fixed		(Note 4)		7/15
Conejo Business Center⁽¹⁾		1,053		1,086		7.88	%	Fixed		(Note 4)		7/15

		428,755		382,639

Unsecured Lines of Credit:
Wells Fargo — $310 mm⁽⁵⁾		286,000		111,500		4.22	%	LIBOR + 0.85% (Notes 6,7)		—		4/09
City National Bank — $20 mm^{(5), (8)}		10,000		10,000		4.09	%	LIBOR + 0.85%		—		8/07

		296,000		121,500

Unsecured Term Loan:
Wells Fargo — $125 mm⁽⁵⁾		125,000		125,000		4.55	%	Fixed (Note 9)		—		2/12

Unsecured Senior Notes:
2005 Notes^{(10), (11)}		—		199,974		8.88	%	Fixed		—		—
2007 Notes⁽¹⁰⁾		149,172		149,395		7.00	%	Fixed (Note 12)		—		11/07
2010 Notes⁽¹⁰⁾		49,806		49,785		9.15	%	Fixed		—		3/10
2010 Notes⁽¹⁰⁾		99,554		99,513		8.50	%	Fixed		—		11/10
2011 Notes⁽¹⁰⁾		198,407		198,278		5.20	%	Fixed		—		9/11
2015 Notes⁽¹³⁾		297,222		—		5.25	%	Fixed		—		3/15

		794,161		696,945

Total Debt	$	1,643,916		1,326,084


(1)		Requires monthly payments of principal and interest.

(2)		In April 2005, we assumed this mortgage loan in conjunction with the acquisition of 5670 Wilshire. The stated interest rate of this loan is 8.50% and the balance is approximately $51.4 million at June 30, 2005. This loan was recorded at its fair market value at the date of acquisition and can be prepaid without penalty beginning in September 2008.

(3)		This loan was repaid in full on January 3, 2005.

(4)		Both mortgage loans are secured by the Conejo Business Center property.

(5)		Requires monthly payments of interest only, with outstanding principal balance due upon maturity.

(6)		This line of credit also has an annual 20 basis point facility fee on the entire $310 million commitment amount. In July 2005, we renewed this line of credit, extending the maturity to April of 2009 and reducing the interest rate from LIBOR + 0.90% to LIBOR + 0.85%.

(7)		We have entered into interest rate swap agreements that fixed the interest rate on $50 million of the outstanding balance on this line of credit at 3.95% through April 2006.

(8)		In July 2005, we renewed this line of credit extending the maturity to August 2007 and reducing the interest rate from LIBOR + 0.90% to LIBOR + 0.85%.

(9)		In February 2005, we extended the maturity of this loan to February 2012. This loan bears interest at LIBOR + 1.25%, however we have entered into interest rate swap agreements that fixed the interest rate on this loan at 4.55% in 2005, 4.70% from January through June 2006, 5.29% from June 2006 through May 2007, 5.55% from June 2007 through November 2008, 5.76% from December 2008 through May 2010 and 5.99% from June 2010 through February 2012.

(10)		Requires semi-annual interest payments only, with principal balance due upon maturity.

(11)		These senior unsecured notes were redeemed on March 1, 2005.

(12)		In June 2005, we terminated $100 million of fixed-to-floating swap agreements related to these notes for a total payment of $466,000.

(13)		In February 2005, we issued $300 million of unsecured senior notes at an interest rate of 5.25%.

5. Interest Rate Hedge Agreements

We have periodically entered into interest rate hedge agreements to effectively convert floating rate debt into fixed rate debt or to remove the variability associated with forecasted issuances of fixed rate debt. Net amounts received or paid under these agreements are recognized as an adjustment to interest expense when such amounts are incurred or earned. Our objective in using interest rate hedge agreements is to manage our exposure to interest rate movements.

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS 133), as amended and interpreted, establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments and for hedging activities. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivatives depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting hedge accounting designation. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivatives used to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges.

For derivatives designated as fair value hedges, changes in the fair value of the derivative and the hedged item related to the hedged risk are recognized in earnings. For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is initially reported in other comprehensive income (loss), outside of earnings and subsequently reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings.

We have used such agreements to fix the floating interest rate associated with $50 million of the Wells Fargo unsecured line of credit and the entire $125 million balance of the unsecured term loan. In conjunction with the extension of our $125 million unsecured term loan in February 2005, we also entered into a series of interest rate swap agreements to fix the interest rate through the extension period. Under these interest rate swap agreements, the interest rate on this loan is effectively fixed at 5.29% from June 2006 through May 2007, 5.55% from June 2007 through November 2008, 5.76% from December 2008 through May 2010 and 5.99% from June 2010 through February 2012. The fair value of the interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges of the interest payments on the unsecured term loan and unsecured credit facility of $0.8 million at June 30, 2005 has been deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss on our balance sheet. The estimated fair value of these interest rate hedge agreements is dependent on changes in market interest rates and other market factors that affect the value of such agreements. Consequently, the estimated current fair value may significantly change during the term of the agreements. Changes in the fair value of these instruments will be deferred in other comprehensive loss and will be subsequently reclassified into interest expense as the hedged interest payments occur. If these derivatives were terminated before their maturity and the hedged debt instruments remained outstanding, amounts deferred in other comprehensive loss related to the terminated derivatives would be reclassified out of other comprehensive loss into interest expense as the hedged interest payments occur. If the underlying debt related to these hedges were to be repaid prior to maturity, any amounts deferred in other comprehensive loss related to these derivatives would be immediately reclassified into current earnings.

In February 2005, we settled $300 million of forward-starting swaps that we entered into in 2004 that were hedging the variability associated with a forecasted $300 million issuance of unsecured senior notes. Associated with the settlement of these forward-starting swaps, we paid approximately $3.9 million to the swap counterparties. This amount had been deferred in other comprehensive loss and will be reclassified into interest expense as the hedged interest payments on the debt occur.

In May and June 2005, we entered into $143 million of forward-starting swaps that effectively fixed the 10-year Treasury rate at an average rate of approximately 4.32% for borrowings that are expected to occur in 2007 to primarily refinance some of our scheduled debt maturities. The forward-starting swaps were entered into at current market rates and, therefore, had no initial cost.

In June 2005, we settled $100 million of fair value hedges that we entered into in 2003 that effectively converted $100 million of 7.00% senior unsecured notes due in November 2007 to a floating rate. From October 2003 to June 2005, we received a total of $2.1 million from our swap counterparties. In conjunction with the settlement of these fair value swaps, we paid approximately $0.5 million to the swap counterparties. This amount also represents the fair value adjustment to the hedged debt, which is still outstanding. Therefore, the $0.5 million fair value adjustment will be amortized into interest expense through November of 2007.

6. Partners’ Capital

A common Operating Partnership unit, or common OP Unit, and a share of Arden Realty’s common stock have essentially the same economic characteristics as they share equally in our total net income or loss and distributions. A common OP Unit may be redeemed for cash or, at our election, for shares of Arden Realty’s common stock on a one-for-one basis.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, Arden Realty redeemed an aggregate of 16,144 and 21,144 common OP Units, respectively, for shares of Arden Realty’s common stock.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2005, Arden Realty issued a total of 233,500 and 571,734, respectively, common shares relating to exercises of stock options.

During the six months ended June 30, 2005, we issued a total of 54,950 common OP Units for a total value of approximately $2.0 million in conjunction with the acquisition of 707 Broadway (see footnote 2).

On April 15, 2005, Arden Realty filed a Form 8-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission outlining recent material agreements entered into by Arden Realty. Included in this report was information regarding restricted shares granted to Arden Realty’s directors and senior executives, directors’ fees and retainers and approved salaries for certain executives for 2005, and the provisions of a new four-year Outperformance Plan, approved by its Board of Directors in April 2005, through which certain executives can receive equity or cash awards if returns generated for shareholders are in excess of threshold amounts. We hired an independent consultant to appraise the value of this plan. Based on this appraiser’s report, the present value of the plan is estimated at approximately $3.4 million which will be expensed on a straight line basis over the term of the plan. The Outperformance Plan is being accounted for as a market condition stock performance plan under SFAS 123.

On April 20, 2005, we made a distribution of $0.505 per common operating partnership unit.

7. Income (Loss) from Taxable REIT Subsidiary

Included in interest and other loss are the operating results of Arden Realty’s taxable REIT subsidiary, or TRS. Under the name of Next>edge, the TRS provides energy consulting services to commercial real estate owners. The following is a breakdown of the components of interest and other income (loss) for each of the periods presented (in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Net (loss) income from TRS	$	(539	)	$	(517	)	$	(1,029	)	$	121
Interest and other (loss) income		(354	)		82			(115	)		209

	$	(893	)	$	(435	)	$	(1,144	)	$	330

8. Stock Option Plan

Beginning on January 1, 2003, we adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation — Transition and Disclosure” under which we began expensing the costs of new stock options granted to employees in 2003 in accordance with SFAS No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” We used the Black-Scholes option valuation model to estimate the fair value of the stock options granted. During the three months ended June 30, 2005 and June 30, 2004, we expensed approximately $10,000 of stock option based employee compensation costs.

The following table reflects pro forma net income and earnings per share had we elected to expense all options granted prior to 2003 assuming the fair value method and using the Black-Scholes option valuation model (in thousands, except per share amounts):


	For the Three Months Ended					For the Six Months Ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2005		2004			2005			2004
Net income allocated to general and limited partners, as reported	$	10,614	$	9,311		$	19,836		$	28,648
Stock based employee compensation costs for options granted prior to 2003 assuming fair value method		—		(77	)		(11	)		(154	)

Net income allocated to general and limited partners, as adjusted	$	10,614	$	9,234		$	19,825		$	28,494

Earnings per share:
Basic as reported	$	0.16	$	0.14		$	0.29		$	0.43

Basic as adjusted	$	0.16	$	0.14		$	0.29		$	0.43

Diluted as reported	$	0.15	$	0.14		$	0.29		$	0.43

Diluted as adjusted	$	0.15	$	0.14		$	0.29		$	0.42

9. Comprehensive Income

Comprehensive income for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, consisted of net income, plus the results of changes in value of cash flow hedges not reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income. The components of comprehensive income are as follows (in thousands):


	For the Three Months Ended					For the Six Months Ended
	June 30,					June 30,
	2005			2004		2005			2004
Net income	$	10,614		$	10,389	$	19,836		$	30,804
Other comprehensive income:
Unrealized derivative (loss) gain on cash flow hedges		(6,482	)		10,406		(3,455	)		1,357
Reclassification adjustment for losses included in earnings		112			2,045		492			3,046


Comprehensive income	$	4,244		$	22,840	$	16,873		$	35,207

10. Commitments and Contingencies

We are presently subject to various lawsuits, claims and proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, none of which if determined unfavorably to us is expected to have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, financial condition or results of operations. There were no material changes in our legal proceedings during the three months ended June 30, 2005.

11. Subsequent Events

In July 2005, we renewed our $310 million unsecured line of credit led by Wells Fargo which was scheduled to mature in April 2006. The new facility matures in April 2009 with the interest rate and facility fee subject to adjustment, based on the Company’s unsecured senior debt rating. Based on our current unsecured senior debt rating of BBB–/Baa3, the new facility bears interest at LIBOR plus 0.85% plus a 0.20% annual facility fee, representing a reduction of 0.05% from the previous facility. In addition, the financial covenants, including real estate asset valuation rates and coverage and liability ratios, were amended to increase the financial flexibility under this facility. The facility has a one-year extension option and can be increased to $400 million.

In July 2005, we also renewed our $20 million unsecured line of credit with City National Bank which was scheduled to mature in August 2005. The new facility will mature in August 2007 with similar interest rates and compliance covenants to that of the Wells Fargo line of credit.

In July 2005, we closed on a $25 million unsecured term loan with a group of banks led by Wells Fargo. This loan matures in October 2005, has two three month extension options and bears interest at LIBOR + 1.05% during both the initial term and the extension periods. The proceeds from this loan were used to pay down our unsecured line of credit with Wells Fargo. This loan is expected to be repaid with proceeds from scheduled asset sales.

On August 4, 2005, we sold two office properties totaling approximately 217,000 square feet located in Kern County and an office property totaling approximately 191,000 square feet located in Los Angeles County for an aggregate of approximately $55.6 million.

On August 5, 2005, we acquired Agoura Hills Business Park, an approximate 115,000 square foot, 90% leased office property located in Los Angeles County for approximately $23.2 million.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

The following discussion relates to our unaudited consolidated financial statements included herein, which should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q and in our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended.

This Form 10-Q, including the documents incorporated herein by reference, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act pertaining to, among other things, our future results of operations, capital resources, portfolio performance, cash available for distribution, acquisitions, lease renewals, property development, property renovation, capital requirements, funds from operations, anticipated market and demographic conditions and general business, industry and economic conditions applicable to us. Forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “continue” or comparable terminology.

Although we believe the expectations reflected in any forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions, we can give no assurance that our expectations will be attained. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to certain risks, trends and uncertainties, many of which we cannot predict with accuracy and some of which we might not even anticipate. Future events and actual results, financial and otherwise, may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include the availability and cost of capital for future investments, our ability to lease or re-lease space at current or anticipated rents, changes in the supply of and demand for our properties, changes in interest rate levels, risks associated with the development, acquisition or disposition of properties, competition within the industry, real estate and market conditions, and other risks detailed from time to time in our SEC filings. The risks included here are not exhaustive, and additional factors could adversely affect our business and financial performance, including risks and factors included in other sections of this Form 10-Q. In addition, we discussed a number of material risks in our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2004. Those risks continue to be relevant to our performance and financial condition. We also operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for management to predict all such risk factors, nor can it assess the impact of all such risk factors on our company’s business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Given these risks and uncertainties, investors should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a prediction of actual results.

In addition, we expressly disclaim any responsibility to update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Accordingly, investors should use caution in relying on past forward-looking statements, which are based on results and trends at the time they were made, to anticipate future results or trends.

We are a self-administered and self-managed real estate company that owns, manages, leases, develops, renovates and acquires commercial properties located in Southern California. We are managed by 6 senior executive officers who have experience in the real estate industry ranging from 14 to 35 years and who collectively have an average of 20 years experience. We perform all property and development management, accounting, finance and acquisition, disposition activities and a majority of our leasing transactions with our staff of approximately 300 employees.

As of June 30, 2005, Arden Realty was Southern California’s largest publicly traded office landlord as measured by total net rentable square feet owned. As of that date, our portfolio was comprised of 121 primarily suburban office properties, consisting of 198 buildings with approximately 19.2 million net rentable square feet, including six properties and eight building currently held for disposition. As of June 30, 2005, our operating portfolio was 90.8% occupied, excluding the six properties currently held for disposition. Including these properties our portfolio was 90.5% occupied.

Our primary business strategy is to actively manage our portfolio to achieve gains in rental rates and occupancy, control operating expenses and maximize income from ancillary operations and services. When market conditions permit, we may also selectively develop, renovate or acquire new properties in submarkets that add value and fit strategically into our portfolio. We may also sell existing properties and use the net proceeds to repay outstanding indebtedness or place into investments that we believe will generate higher long-term value.

Critical Accounting Policies

Refer to our 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion of our critical accounting policies. There were no material changes to these policies during the three months ended June 30, 2005.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of June 30, 2005, we do not have off-balance sheet transactions, arrangements or obligations (including contingent obligations) that have, or are reasonably likely to have a current or future material effect on our financial condition, changes in our financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Our financial position and operating results primarily relate to our portfolio of commercial properties and income derived from those properties. Therefore, the comparability of financial data from period to period will be affected by the timing of property developments, acquisitions and dispositions.

Comparison of the three months ended June 30, 2005 to the three months ended June 30, 2004
(in thousands, except number of properties and percentages):


	Three Months Ended
	June 30,									Percent
	2005			2004			Change			Change
Total Portfolio:

Revenue from rental operations:
Scheduled cash rents	$	96,079		$	83,384		$	12,695			15	%
Straight-line rents		973			468			505			108
Tenant reimbursements		4,371			4,341			30			1
Parking, net of expense		6,740			5,891			849			14
Other rental operations		1,565			2,212			(647	)		(29	)

Total revenue from rental operations		109,728			96,296			13,432			14


Property expenses:
Repairs and maintenance		12,694			10,496			2,198			21
Utilities		8,076			7,350			726			10
Real estate taxes		8,660			7,314			1,346			18
Insurance		1,845			1,788			57			3
Ground rent		334			207			127			61
Administrative		5,336			3,997			1,339			34

Total property expenses		36,945			31,152			5,793			19

Property Operating Results ⁽¹⁾		72,783			65,144			7,639			12
General and administrative		7,560			4,665			2,895			62
Interest expense		24,913			20,931			3,982			19
Depreciation and amortization		35,880			28,617			7,263			25
Interest and other loss		893			435			458			105
Impairment on investment in securities		—			2,700			(2,700	)		(100	)
Minority interest		104			47			57			121

Income from continuing operations	$	3,433		$	7,749		$	(4,316	)		(56	)%

Discontinued operations	$	2,862		$	2,240		$	622			28	%


Number of Properties:
Disposed of during period		1			—
Acquired during period		1			1
In service at end of period		121			128

Net Rentable Square Feet:
Disposed of during period		(49	)		—
Acquired during period		409			283
In service at end of period		19,214			18,785

Same Property Portfolio⁽²⁾:
Revenue from rental operations	$	100,338		$	98,654		$	1,684			2	%
Property expenses		33,384			31,806			1,578			5	%

	$	66,954		$	66,848		$	106			—	%


Straight-line rents	$	(155	)	$	50		$	(205	)		(410	)%


Number of non-development properties		115			115
Number of buildings		187			187
Average occupancy		90.5	%		89.5	%
Net rentable square feet		17,221			17,221


(1)		Property Operating Results is commonly used by investors to evaluate the performance of real estate companies, to determine trends in earnings and to compute the fair value of properties as it is not affected by (1) the cost of funds of the property owner or (2) the impact of depreciation and amortization expenses as well as gains or losses from the sale of operating real estate assets that are included in net income computed in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or GAAP. The first factor is commonly eliminated from net income because it is specific to the particular financing capabilities and constraints of the owner. The second factor is commonly eliminated because it may not accurately represent the actual change in value


		in real estate properties that results from use or changes in market conditions. We believe that eliminating these costs from net income gives investors an additional measure of operating performance that, when used as an adjunct to net income computed in accordance with GAAP, can be a useful measure of our operating results.

		Property Operating Results captures trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs. However, Property Operating Results excludes general and administrative costs, interest expense, interest income, depreciation and amortization expense and gains or losses from the sale of properties, changes in value in our real estate properties that result from use or permanent impairment to carrying costs as stipulated by GAAP, the level of capital expenditures and leasing costs necessary to maintain the operating performance of our properties, all of which are significant economic costs. Therefore, Property Operating Results may fail to capture significant trends which limits its usefulness.

		Property Operating Results is a non-GAAP measure of performance. Property Operating Results is not a substitute for net income as computed in accordance with GAAP. It excludes significant expense components such as depreciation and amortization expense and financing costs. This measure should be analyzed in conjunction with net income and cash flow from operating activities as computed in accordance with GAAP. Other companies may use different methods for calculating Property Operating Results or similarly entitled measures and, accordingly, our Property Operating Results may not be comparable to similarly entitled measures reported by other companies that do not define the measure exactly as we do.

		The following is a reconciliation of net income computed in accordance with GAAP to Property Operating Results (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended
	June 30,
	2005		2004
Net income	$	10,614	$	10,389
Add:
General and administrative expense		7,560		4,665
Interest expense		24,913		20,931
Depreciation and amortization		35,880		28,617
Minority interest		104		47
Interest and other loss		893		435
Impairment on investment in securities		—		2,700
Less:
Gain on sale of discontinued properties		4,319		400
Discontinued operations		2,862		2,240

Property Operating Results	$	72,783	$	65,144


(2)		Consists of non-development/renovation properties classified as part of continuing operations and owned for the entirety of the periods presented.

VARIANCES FOR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Our Property Operating Results for the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 were primarily affected by our acquisitions and development activities since March 31, 2004.

As a result of these changes within our portfolio of properties since March 31, 2004, we do not believe the Property Operating Results presented above are comparable from period to period. Therefore, in the table above, we have also presented the Property Operating Results for our same store portfolio.

Revenue from Rental Operations

Revenue from rental operations increased approximately $13.4 million, or 14% for the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. This increase was primarily due to revenues from our 6100 Center Drive development property at our Howard Hughes Center which was placed in service during the second quarter of 2004, two office properties acquired in Los Angeles County in October 2004 totaling approximately 391,000 square feet, two office properties acquired in San Diego County in January 2005 and March 2005, respectively, totaling approximately 778,000 square feet, one property acquired in Los Angeles County in April 2005 totaling approximately 409,000 square feet and from overall occupancy gains and scheduled rent increases in the remainder of our operating portfolio of properties.

Revenue from rental operations for the same store portfolio increased approximately $1.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004, primarily due to an approximate $2.8 million increase in scheduled cash rents, partially offset by an approximate $0.9 million decrease in other rental operations. The increase in cash rents was primarily attributable to a 1.0% increase in the average occupancy of these properties and scheduled rent increases in our existing leases. The decrease in other rental operations was primarily attributable to lower lease termination fees in 2005.

Property Expenses

Property expenses increased approximately $5.8 million, or 19% for the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. This increase was primarily due to our acquisition and development activities, gains in occupancy and increases in operating expenses for the same store portfolio described below.

Property expenses for the same store portfolio increased approximately $1.6 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004, primarily due to an approximate $1.1 million increases in repairs and maintenance and an

approximate $0.5 million increase in property administrative expenses. The increase in repairs and maintenance is primarily attributable to increases in rates for contracted services, including janitorial and security guard services and the timing of certain projects. The increase in property administrative expenses is primarily due to higher employee compensation costs as a result of annual merit increases and the timing of property legal expenses.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues, including revenues from discontinued properties, were approximately 6.6% for the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to approximately 4.4% for the same period in 2004. The approximate $2.9 million increase in general and administrative expenses over 2004 was primarily due to a $2.2 million increase in personnel costs and increases due to the timing of various other costs including investor relations and legal fees. Personnel costs increased due to costs associated with annual merit increases, costs related to our Deferred Compensation Plan, addition of resources within our capital market and investment activities and increases in non-cash compensation totaling approximately $0.9 million. Our Deferred Compensation Plan costs increased due to an expansion in the number of participants and contributions made. Non-cash compensation costs increased primarily due to restricted stock grants made since the first quarter of 2004 and costs associated with a long-term Outperformance Compensation Plan approved by our Board of Directors in April 2005 through which certain executives can receive equity or cash awards if returns generated are in excess of threshold amounts.

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased approximately $4.0 million, or 19%, for the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004, primarily due to higher net borrowings during 2005 as a result of our approximate $326 million in property acquisitions year-to-date which were partially offset by lower interest costs as a result of our refinancing activities. In March 2005, we refinanced $200 million of 8.875% unsecured notes with 10-year unsecured notes at an all-in rate of 5.5%. We expect to reduce our current debt balances with proceeds from asset sales scheduled for the second half of 2005.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense increased by approximately $7.3 million, or 25% for the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004, primarily due to depreciation related to a development property placed in service in the second quarter of 2004, two properties acquired in October 2004, one property acquired in January 2005, one property acquired in March 2005, one property acquired in April 2005 and depreciation related to capital expenditures, tenant improvements and leasing commissions placed in service subsequent to March 31, 2004.

Interest and Other Loss

Interest and other loss increased approximately $0.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 primarily due to a loss recorded on the sale of a leasehold interest in June 2005.

Comparison of the six months ended June 30, 2005 to the six months ended June 30, 2004
(in thousands, except number of properties and percentages):


	Six Months Ended
	June 30,									Percent
	2005			2004			Change			Change
Total Portfolio:

Revenue from rental operations:
Scheduled cash rents	$	185,401		$	166,059		$	19,342			12	%
Straight-line rents		1,678			1,400			278			20
Tenant reimbursements		9,462			8,665			797			9
Parking, net of expense		12,689			11,356			1,333			12
Other rental operations		3,759			4,238			(479	)		(11	)

Total revenue from rental operations		212,989			191,718			21,271			11


Property expenses:
Repairs and maintenance		24,650			20,794			3,856			19
Utilities		15,568			14,214			1,354			10
Real estate taxes		16,762			14,761			2,001			14
Insurance		3,576			3,635			(59	)		(2	)
Ground rent		637			332			305			92
Administrative		9,818			8,404			1,414			17

Total property expenses		71,011			62,140			8,871			14

Property Operating Results ⁽¹⁾		141,978			129,578			12,400			10
General and administrative		15,805			9,149			6,656			73
Interest expense		47,839			43,989			3,850			9
Depreciation and amortization		66,893			56,043			10,850			19
Interest and other loss (income)		1,144			(330	)		1,474			447
Impairment on investment in securities		—			2,700			(2,700	)		(100	)
Minority interest		158			61			97			159

Income from continuing operations	$	10,139		$	17,966		$	(7,827	)		(44	)%

Discontinued operations	$	3,878		$	6,009		$	(2,131	)		(35	)%


Number of Properties:
Disposed of during period		(2	)		(2	)
Acquired during period		3			—
Completed and placed in service during period		—			1
In service at end of period		121			128

Net Rentable Square Feet:
Disposed of during period		(217	)		(295	)
Acquired during period		1,187			—
Completed and placed in service during period		—			283
In service at end of period		19,214			18,785

Same Property Portfolio⁽²⁾:
Revenue from rental operations	$	199,738		$	196,575		$	3,163			2	%
Property expenses		66,525			63,558			2,967			5	%

	$	133,213		$	133,017		$	196			—	%


Straight-line rents	$	(84	)	$	400		$	(484	)		(121	)%


Number of non-development properties		115			115
Number of buildings		187			187
Average occupancy		90.7	%		89.6	%
Net rentable square feet		17,221			17,221


(1)		Property Operating Results is commonly used by investors to evaluate the performance of REITs, to determine trends in earnings and to compute the fair value of properties as it is not affected by (1) the cost of funds of the property owner or (2) the impact of depreciation and amortization expenses as well as gains or losses from the sale of operating real estate assets that are included in net income computed in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, or GAAP. The first factor is commonly eliminated from net income because it is specific to the particular financing capabilities and constraints of the owner. The second factor is commonly eliminated because it may not accurately represent the actual change in value in real estate properties that results from use or changes in market conditions. We believe that eliminating these costs from net income gives investors an additional measure of operating performance that, when used as an adjunct to net income computed in accordance with GAAP, can be a useful measure of our operating results.

		Property Operating Results captures trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs. However, Property Operating Results excludes


		general and administrative costs, interest expense, interest income, depreciation and amortization expense and gains or losses from the sale of properties, changes in value in our real estate properties that result from use or permanent impairment to carrying costs as stipulated by GAAP, the level of capital expenditures and leasing costs necessary to maintain the operating performance of our properties, all of which are significant economic costs. Therefore, Property Operating Results may fail to capture significant trends which limits its usefulness.

		Property Operating Results is a non-GAAP measure of performance. Property Operating Results is not a substitute for net income as computed in accordance with GAAP. It excludes significant expense components such as depreciation and amortization expense and financing costs. This measure should be analyzed in conjunction with net income and cash flow from operating activities as computed in accordance with GAAP. Other companies may use different methods for calculating Property Operating Results or similarly entitled measures and, accordingly, our Property Operating Results may not be comparable to similarly entitled measures reported by other companies that do not define the measure exactly as we do.

		The following is a reconciliation of net income computed in accordance with GAAP to Property Operating Results (in thousands):


	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005		2004
Net income	$	19,836	$	30,804
Add:
General and administrative expense		15,805		9,149
Interest expense		47,839		43,989
Depreciation and amortization		66,893		56,043
Minority interest		158		61
Impairment on investment in securities		—		2,700
Interest and other loss		1,144		—
Loss from debt defeasance related to sale of discontinued property		557		—
Less:
Gain on sale of discontinued properties		6,376		6,829
Discontinued operations		3,878		6,009
Interest and other income		—		330

Property Operating Results	$	141,978	$	129,578


(2)		Consists of non-development/renovation properties classified as part of continuing operations and owned for the entirety of the periods presented.

VARIANCES FOR RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Our Property Operating Results for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004 were primarily affected by our acquisitions and development activities since January 1, 2004.

As a result of these changes within our portfolio of properties since January 1, 2004, we do not believe the Property Operating Results presented above are comparable from period to period. Therefore, in the table above, we have also presented the Property Operating Results for our same store portfolio.

Revenue from Rental Operations

Revenue from rental operations increased approximately $21.3 million, or 11% for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. This increase was primarily due to revenues from our 6100 Center Drive development property which was placed in service during the second quarter of 2004, two office properties acquired in Los Angeles County in October 2004 totaling approximately 391,000 square feet, two office properties acquired in San Diego County in January 2005 and March 2005 totaling approximately 778,000 square feet, one property acquired in Los Angeles County in April 2005 totaling approximately 409,000 square feet and from overall occupancy gains and scheduled rent increases in our properties.

Revenue from rental operations for the same store portfolio increased approximately $3.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004, primarily due to an approximate $4.7 million increase in scheduled cash rents, partially offset by an approximate $1.2 million decrease in other rental operations. The increase in scheduled cash rents was primarily attributable to a 1.10% increase in average occupancy and scheduled rent increases in our existing leases. The decrease in other rental operations was primarily attributable to lower lease termination fees in 2005.

Property Expenses

Property expenses increased approximately $8.9 million, or 14% for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004. This increase was primarily due to our acquisition and development activities, gains in occupancy and increases in operating expenses for the same store portfolio described below.

Property expenses for the same store portfolio increased approximately $3.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004, primarily due to an approximate $2.2 million increase in repairs and maintenance, an approximate $0.4 million increase in property administrative expenses and an approximate $0.2 million increase in ground rent expense. The increase in repairs and maintenance was primarily attributable to higher rates for contracted services, including janitorial and security guard services and the timing of certain projects. The increase in property administrative expenses was primarily attributable to higher personnel costs as a result of annual merit increases. The increase in ground rent expense was primarily attributable to contingent ground rent for one of our properties.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses as a percentage of total revenues were approximately 7.1% for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to approximately 4.3% for the same period in 2004. The approximate $6.7 million increase in general and administrative expenses over 2004 was primarily due to $1.7 million in employee separation costs, a $3.9 million increase in personnel costs, $0.4 million in dead-deal costs for a proposed fee-development project and increases due to the timing of various other costs including investor relations and legal fees. Personnel costs increased due to costs associated with annual merit increases, costs related to our Deferred Compensation Plan, addition of resources within our capital market and investment activities and increases in non-cash compensation totaling approximately $0.8 million. Our Deferred Compensation Plan costs increased due to an expansion in the number of participants and contributions made. Non-cash compensation costs increased primarily due to restricted stock grants made since the first quarter of 2004 and costs associated with a long-term Outperformance Compensation Plan approved by the Board of Directors in April 2005 through which certain executives can receive equity or cash awards if returns generated are in excess of threshold amounts.

Interest Expense

Interest expense increased approximately $3.9 million, or 9%, for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004, primarily due to higher net borrowings during 2005 as a result of our approximate $326 million in property acquisitions year-to-date which were partially offset by lower interest costs as a result of our refinancing activities. In March 2005, we refinanced $200 million of 8.875% unsecured notes with 10-year unsecured notes at an all-in rate of 5.5%. We expect to reduce our current debt balances with proceeds from asset sales scheduled for the second half of 2005.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation and amortization expense increased by approximately $10.8 million, or 19% for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004, primarily due to depreciation related to a development property placed in service in the second quarter of 2004, two properties acquired in October 2004, one property acquired in January 2005, one property acquired in March 2005, one property acquired in April 2005 and depreciation related to capital expenditures, tenant improvements and leasing commissions placed in service subsequent to March 31, 2004.

Interest and Other Loss (Income)

Interest and other loss (income) decreased by approximately $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to the same period in 2004, primarily due to net income recognized from a consulting and installation project completed during the three months ended March 31, 2004 for Next>edge, Arden Realty’s taxable REIT subsidiary that provides energy consulting services and from a loss recorded on the sale of a leasehold interest in June 2005.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Cash Flows

Cash provided by operating activities decreased by approximately $3.5 million to $79.1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to $82.6 million for the same period in 2004. This decrease was primarily due to the loss of operating cash flows from fourteen properties sold since the beginning of 2004 as part of our capital recycling program, partially offset by the increased operating cash flows from five properties acquired since the beginning of 2004 and our 6100 Center Drive development property which was placed in service during the second quarter of 2004.

Cash used in investing activities increased by approximately $303.1 million to an outflow of $282.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to an inflow of $20.9 million for the same period in 2004. This increase was primarily due to the acquisitions of three properties during the six months ended June 30, 2005 totaling approximately $325.7 million and the sale of two assets totaling approximately $67.5 million during the six months ended June 30, 2004.

Cash provided financing activities increased by approximately $301.3 million to an inflow of $203.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005 compared to an outflow of $98.3 million for the same period in 2004. This increase was primarily due to the issuance of $300 million of unsecured senior notes in February 2005. The proceeds from these notes were used to redeem $200 million of unsecured senior notes that matured in march of 2005 and to partially fund our acquisition activities.

Cash Balances and Available Borrowings

As of June 30, 2005, we had approximately $26.4 million in cash and cash equivalents, including $13.4 million in restricted cash. Restricted cash consisted of $9.7 million in interest bearing cash deposits required by four of our mortgage loans payable and $3.7 million in cash impound accounts for real estate taxes and insurance as required by several of our mortgage loans payable.

Through our Operating Partnership, we have access to a total of $330 million under two unsecured lines of credit. As of June 30, 2005, $296.0 million was outstanding and $34.0 million was available under these unsecured lines of credit.

Capital Recycling Program

Under our capital recycling program, we evaluate our existing portfolio of properties and current market opportunities to determine if the sale or purchase of properties would improve the overall quality or return on invested capital of our existing portfolio. Proceeds from sales of properties may be used to pay down our borrowings until we identify attractive properties to purchase, renovate or develop. During the three months ended June 30, 2005, we sold one office property totaling approximately 49,000 square feet for approximately $8.7 million in gross sales proceeds. During the three months ended June 30, 2005, we acquired one office property consisting of approximately 409,000 square feet for approximately $92.7 million. For additional information regarding the properties acquired and sold, see the accompanying notes to our financial statements elsewhere in this report.

Debt Summary

Following is a summary of scheduled principal payments for our total debt outstanding (in thousands):


Year	Amount
2005	$	4,361
2006		9,570
2007		169,838	⁽¹⁾
2008		281,567
2009		398,004	⁽²⁾
2010		150,019
2011		200,251
2012		125,481
2013		558
2014		627
Thereafter		303,640

Total	$	1,643,916


(1)		Includes $10 million outstanding on our City National Bank unsecured line of credit that was extended to August 2007 in July 2005.

(2)		Includes $286 million outstanding on our Wells Fargo unsecured line of credit that was extended to April 2009 in July 2005.

Following is certain other information related to our outstanding indebtedness:

Unsecured and Secured Debt:


						Weighted			Weighted
						Average			Average
	Balance		Percent			Interest Rate⁽¹⁾			Maturity (in years)
	(000’s)
Unsecured Debt	$	1,215,161		74	%		5.80	%		7.1
Secured Debt		428,755		26			6.88			3.0

Total Debt	$	1,643,916		100	%		6.08	%		6.9

Floating and Fixed Rate Debt:


						Weighted			Weighted
						Average			Average
	Balance		Percent			Interest Rate⁽¹⁾			Maturity (in years)
	(000’s)
Floating Rate Debt	$	246,000		15	%		4.84	%		3.7
Fixed Debt⁽²⁾		1,397,916		85			6.30			6.4

Total Debt	$	1,643,916		100	%		6.08	%		6.9


(1)		Includes amortization of prepaid financing costs.

(2)		Includes $175 million of floating rate debt that has been fixed through interest rate swap agreements.

Total interest incurred and the amount capitalized was as follows (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005		2004		2005		2004
Total interest incurred⁽¹⁾	$	25,097	$	21,382	$	48,360	$	44,851
Amount capitalized		97		198		332		354

Amount expensed⁽¹⁾	$	25,000	$	21,184	$	48,028	$	44,497


(1)		Includes interest expense for loans secured by a property currently classified as “held for disposition” and one property sold during the three months ended March 31, 2005.

Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service and Compliance with Principal Financial Covenants

Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service is a non-GAAP measurement of our performance and liquidity. Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service is presented below because this data is used by investors and our management as a supplemental measure to (a) evaluate our operating performance and compare it to other real estate companies, (b) determine trends in earnings, (c) determine our ability to service debt and (d) determine our ability to fund future capital expenditure requirements. As discussed more fully below, Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service is also used in several financial covenants we are required to satisfy each quarter under the terms of our principal debt agreements.

Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service permits investors and management to view income from our operations on an unleveraged basis before the effects of non-cash depreciation and amortization expense. By excluding interest expense, Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service measures our operating performance independent of our capital structure and indebtedness and, therefore, allows for a more meaningful comparison of our operating performance between quarters as well as annual periods and to compare our operating performance to that of other companies, and to more readily identify and evaluate trends in earnings.

The usefulness of Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service is limited because it does not reflect interest expense, taxes, gains or losses on sales of property, losses on valuations of derivatives, asset impairment losses, cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle, extraordinary items as defined by GAAP and depreciation and amortization costs. These costs have been or may in the future be incurred by us, each of which affects or could effect our operating performance and ability to finance our investments at competitive borrowing costs, successfully maintain our REIT status, and acquire and dispose of real estate properties at favorable prices to us. Some of these costs also reflect changes in value in our properties that result from use or changes in market conditions and the level of capital expenditures and leasing costs necessary to maintain the operating performance of our properties. Due to the significance of the net income components excluded from Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service, this measure should not be considered an alternative to (and should be considered in conjunction with) net income, cash flow from operations, and other performance or liquidity measures prescribed by GAAP. This measure should also be analyzed in conjunction with discussions elsewhere in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” regarding the items eliminated in the calculation of Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service.

The reader is cautioned that Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service, as calculated by Arden Realty, may not be comparable to similar measures reported by other companies (under names such as or similar to Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service, EBITDA or adjusted EBITDA) that do not define this measure exactly the same as we do.

The following is a reconciliation of net cash provided by operating activities of Arden Realty and net income of Arden Realty computed in accordance with GAAP to Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	48,158		$	38,693		$	78,935		$	82,535
Add:
Interest expense including discontinued operations		25,000			21,184			48,028			44,497
Loss from debt defeasance related to sale of discontinued property		—			—			557			—
Less:
Amortization of loan costs and fees		(848	)		(1,004	)		(1,718	)		(2,083	)
Straight-line rent		(997	)		(448	)		(1,801	)		(1,341	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Rent and other receivables		242			(223	)		1,704			1,834
Deferred rent		174			345			2,336			1,982
Prepaid financing costs, expenses and other assets		(743	)		1,672			(262	)		2,205
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(2,719	)		6,630			3,837			4,989
Security deposits		(281	)		(605	)		(864	)		(876	)

Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service	$	67,986		$	66,244		$	130,752		$	133,742


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Net Income	$	10,449		$	9,127		$	19,490		$	27,988
Add:
Interest expense including discontinued operations		25,000			21,184			48,028			44,497
Depreciation and amortization		35,880			28,617			66,893			56,043
Amortization of deferred compensation		1,693			785			2,212			1,531
Minority interest		89			1,245			260			2,556
Loss from debt defeasance related to sale of discontinued property		—			—			557			—
Minority interest from discontinued operations		180			64			244			321
Depreciation from discontinued operations		11			3,370			1,245			6,276
Impairment on investment in securities		—			2,700			—			2,700
Less:
Gain on sale of discontinued properties		(4,319	)		(400	)		(6,376	)		(6,829	)
Straight-line rent		(997	)		(448	)		(1,801	)		(1,341	)

Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service	$	67,986		$	66,244		$	130,752		$	133,742

Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service is also presented because it is used in ratios contained in the principal financial covenants of the Indenture governing our publicly traded senior unsecured notes and our Credit Agreement with a syndicate of banks led by Wells Fargo. As of June 30, 2005, our senior unsecured notes represented approximately 48% of our total outstanding debt and amounts outstanding under our Wells Fargo unsecured line of credit represented approximately 18% of our total outstanding debt. The Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service ratios and the other ratios reported below are part of financial covenants we are required to satisfy each fiscal quarter. We believe information about these ratios is useful to (1) confirm that we are in compliance with the financial covenants of our principal loan agreements, (2) evaluate our ability to service our debt, (3) evaluate our ability to fund future capital expenditures, and (4) compare our ratios to other real estate companies, including other real estate companies, that present the same ratios.

If we were to fail to satisfy these financial covenants, we would be in default under the terms of the Indenture for the senior unsecured notes and/or the Wells Fargo Credit Agreement. A default under those agreements could accelerate the obligation to repay such debt and could cause us to be in default under our other debt agreements. Depending on the circumstances surrounding such acceleration, we might not be able to repay the debt on terms that are favorable to us, or at all, which would have a material adverse affect on our financial condition and our ability to raise capital in the future.

The reader is cautioned that these ratios, as calculated by us, may not be comparable to similarly entitled ratios reported by other companies that do not calculate these ratios exactly the same as we do. These ratios should not be considered as alternatives to the ratio of earnings to fixed charges.

The following table summarizes the principal ratios contained in the financial covenants of our senior unsecured notes and Wells Fargo unsecured line of credit as of June 30, 2005 (in thousands, except percentage and covenant ratio data):


Net investment in real estate	$	2,849,328
Cash and cash equivalents		12,934
Restricted cash		13,449
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		533,855

Total Gross Assets	$	3,409,566


Gross Value of Unencumbered Assets	$	2,443,336


Mortgage loans payable⁽¹⁾	$	428,755
Unsecured lines of credit		296,000
Unsecured term loan		125,000
Unsecured senior notes, net of discount		794,161

Total Outstanding Debt	$	1,643,916


Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service⁽²⁾	$	267,230


Interest incurred⁽²⁾	$	93,960
Loan fee amortization⁽²⁾		(2,768	)

Debt Service⁽²⁾	$	91,192


Senior Unsecured Notes Covenant Ratios	Test	Actual
Ratio of Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service to Debt Service	Greater than 1.5		2.9
Total Outstanding Debt/Total Gross Assets	Less than 60%		48	%
Secured Debt/Total Gross Assets	Less than 40%		13	%
Gross Value of Unencumbered Assets/Unsecured Debt	Greater than 150%		201	%


Wells Fargo Unsecured Line of Credit Covenant Ratios	Test	Actual
Ratio of Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service to interest expense⁽³⁾	Greater than 2.0		2.8
Ratio of Consolidated Income Available for Debt Service to fixed charges ⁽⁴⁾	Greater than 1.75		2.1


(1)		Represents 9 secured loans that are secured by 52 properties in our portfolio.

(2)		Represents amounts for the most recent four consecutive quarters. Loan fee amortization excludes discount amortization on senior unsecured notes.

(3)		Interest expense consists of interest expense plus capitalized interest and less amortization of loan fees and discounts. In conjunction with the amendment of this unsecured line of credit in July 2005, this compliance calculation is no longer required.

(4)		Fixed charges consist of interest costs, whether expensed or capitalized, principal payments on all debt, an amount equal to $0.3125 per quarter multiplied by the weighted average gross leaseable square feet of the portfolio at the end of the period and preferred unit distributions. In conjunction with the amendment of this unsecured line of credit in July 2005, the benchmark for this compliance calculation was reduced from 1.75 to 1.50.

Funds from Operations

The following table reflects the calculation of our funds from operations for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004 (in thousands):


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2005			2004			2005			2004
Funds From Operations:⁽¹⁾
Net income	$	10,614		$	10,389		$	19,836		$	30,804
Depreciation from discontinued operations		11			3,370			1,245			6,276
Gain on sale of discontinued properties		(4,319	)		(400	)		(6,376	)		(6,829	)
Depreciation and amortization		35,880			28,617			66,893			56,043
Minority interest		104			47			158			61
Income allocated to Preferred Operating Partnership Units		—			(1,078	)		—			(2,156	)

Funds From Operations⁽²⁾	$	42,290		$	40,945		$	81,756		$	84,199


Weighted average common shares and Operating Partnership units outstanding — Diluted		68,638			67,430			68,473			67,173


(1)		We believe that funds from operations, or FFO, is a useful supplemental measure of our operating performance. We compute FFO in accordance with standards established by the White Paper on FFO approved by the Board of Governors of the National Association of Real Estate Investment Trusts, or NAREIT, in April 2002. The White Paper defines FFO as net income or loss computed in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, excluding extraordinary items, as defined by GAAP, and gains and losses from sales of depreciable operating property plus real estate-related depreciation and amortization and after adjustments for unconsolidated partnerships and joint ventures.

		We believe that FFO, by excluding depreciation costs, the gains or losses from the sale of operating real estate properties and the extraordinary items as defined by GAAP, provides an additional perspective on our operating results. However, because these excluded items have a real economic effect, FFO is a limited measure of performance.

		FFO captures trends in occupancy rates, rental rates and operating costs. FFO excludes depreciation and amortization costs and it does not capture the changes in value in our properties that result from use or changes in market conditions or the level of capital expenditures and leasing costs necessary to maintain the operating performance of our properties, all of which are significant economic costs. Therefore, its ability to measure performance is limited.

		Because FFO excludes significant economic components of net income determined in accordance with GAAP, FFO should be used as an adjunct to net income and not as an alternative to net income. FFO should also not be used as an indicator of our financial performance, or as a substitute for cash flow from operating activities determined in accordance with GAAP or as a measure of our liquidity. FFO is not by itself indicative of funds available to fund our cash needs, including our ability to pay dividends or service our debt.

		FFO is used by investors to compare our performance with other real estate companies. Other real estate companies may use different methods for calculating FFO and, accordingly, our FFO may not be comparable to other real estate companies.

(2)		Includes approximately $1.7 million and $0.8 million in non-cash compensation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively, and approximately $2.2 million and $1.5 million in non-cash compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively.

Portfolio and Lease Information

The following tables set forth certain information regarding our properties as of June 30, 2005.

PORTFOLIO SUMMARY
As of June 30, 2005


																Property Operating Results
	Number of					Number of					Approximate Net					Three Months Ended					Six Months Ended
Location	Properties					Buildings					Rentable (Sq. Ft.)					June 30, 2005					June 30, 2005
																(in thousands and					(in thousands and
																unaudited)					unaudited)

	Total		% of Total			Total		% of Total			Total		% of Total			Total		% of Total			Total		% of Total
Los Angeles County
West⁽¹⁾		30		25	%		32		16	%		5,408,635		28	%	$	28,609		38	%	$	55,353		37	%
North		28		23	%		44		22	%		3,453,333		18	%		13,298		18	%		26,956		18	%
South		11		9	%		15		8	%		2,450,252		13	%		7,529		10	%		15,146		10	%

Subtotal		69		57	%		91		46	%		11,312,220		59	%		49,436		66	%		97,455		65	%

Orange County		18		15	%		50		25	%		3,214,977		17	%		9,331		12	%		18,712		13	%
San Diego County		24		20	%		36		18	%		3,310,065		17	%		12,082		16	%		21,959		15	%
Ventura/Kern Counties		4		3	%		13		7	%		575,224		3	%		1,934		2	%		3,852		3	%


Subtotal⁽²⁾		115		95	%		190		96	%		18,412,486		96	%	$	72,783		96	%	$	141,978		96	%
Properties Held for Disposition		6		5			8		4	%		801,403		4	%		2,960		4			5,312		4

Total (Including Properties Held for Disposition)		121		100	%		198		100	%		19,213,889		100	%	$	75,743		100	%	$	147,290		100	%


(1)		Includes a retail property with approximately 37,000 net rentable square feet.

(2)		Excludes six properties currently classified as “held for disposition” as of June 30, 2005.

PORTFOLIO OCCUPANCY AND IN-PLACE RENTS
As of June 30, 2005


	Percent			Percent			Annualized Base Rent
Location	Occupied			Leased			Per Leased Square Foot⁽¹⁾
							Portfolio		Full Service
							Total		Gross Leases⁽²⁾
Los Angeles County
West		93.7	%		95.3	%	$	28.09	$	28.11
North		93.7	%		94.4	%		22.57		23.21
South		91.0	%		92.6	%		19.07		20.40

Subtotal/Weighted Average		93.1	%		94.4	%	$	24.49	$	25.20

Orange County		87.7	%		92.5	%		19.54		22.11
San Diego County		84.7	%		85.2	%		22.78		25.28
Ventura/Kern Counties		97.1	%		97.1	%		19.71		19.71


Subtotal/Weighted Average⁽³⁾		90.8	%		92.5	%	$	23.19	$	24.55

Properties Held for Disposition		84.1	%		84.1	%		17.01		18.85


Total/Weighted Average		90.5	%		92.2	%	$	22.95	$	24.41


(1)		Based on monthly contractual base rent under existing leases as of June 30, 2005, multiplied by 12 and divided by leased net rentable square feet; for those leases where rent has not yet commenced or which are in a free rent period, the first month in which rent is to be received is used to determine annualized base rent.

(2)		Excludes 29 properties and approximately 3.2 million square feet under triple net and modified gross leases.

(3)		Excludes six properties classified as “held for disposition” as of June 30, 2005.

TEN LARGEST TENANTS⁽¹⁾
As of June 30, 2005


			Weighted		Percentage of			Percentage of
			Average		Aggregate			Aggregate
			Remaining		Portfolio			Portfolio					Annualized
	Number of		Lease Term		Leased			Annualized			Net Rentable		Base Rent
Tenant	Locations		in Months		Square Feet			Base Rent⁽²⁾			Square Feet		(in thousands)⁽²⁾
Vivendi Universal		2		39		1.36	%		2.02	%		231,681	$	7,980
State of California		16		45		1.53	%		1.45	%		261,120		5,736
U.S. Government		14		51		0.93	%		1.10	%		158,070		4,336
Ceridian Corporation		2		86		0.90	%		0.97	%		152,612		3,822
Atlantic Richfield		1		15		0.84	%		0.90	%		143,885		3,551
Pepperdine University		1		161		0.67	%		0.86	%		113,488		3,400
University of Phoenix		5		44		0.85	%		0.83	%		144,498		3,303
Westfield Corporation		1		94		0.62	%		0.82	%		106,008		3,226
Walt Disney Pictures & Television		1		37		0.83	%		0.81	%		141,457		3,196
Homestore.com, Inc.		1		31		0.81	%		0.77	%		137,762		3,036

Total/Weighted Average⁽³⁾		44		56		9.34	%		10.53	%		1,590,581	$	41,586


(1)		Excludes tenants occupying six properties classified as “held for disposition” at June 30, 2005.

(2)		Annualized base rent is calculated as monthly contractual base rent under existing leases as of June 30, 2005 multiplied by 12; for those leases where rent has not yet commenced or which are in a free rent period, the first month in which rent is to be received is used to determine annualized base rent.

(3)		The weighted average calculation is based on net rentable square footage leased by each tenant.

LEASING ACTIVITY⁽¹⁾


	Three Months			Six Months
	Ended			Ended
	June 30, 2005			June 30, 2005
Net Absorption (square feet)		27,732			62,476


Gross New Leasing Activity (square feet)⁽²⁾		548,053			990,686


Gross Renewal Leasing Activity (square feet)		536,026			1,017,021


Retention Rate		64	%		64	%


Cash Rent Growth⁽³⁾:
Expiring Rate	$	22.38		$	22.29

New / Renewed Rate	$	22.49		$	22.02

Increase (decrease)		0.5	%		(1.2	)%


GAAP Rent Growth⁽⁴⁾:
Expiring Rate	$	21.46		$	21.39

New / Renewed Rate	$	23.24		$	22.65

Increase		8.3	%		5.9	%


Weighted Average Lease Term in Months — New		59			56

Weighted Average Lease Term in Months — Renewal		40			39


Tenant Improvements and Commissions (per square foot):
New⁽²⁾	$	22.28		$	20.69

Renewal	$	11.35		$	9.43


Capital Expenditures (per square foot):
Recurring	$	0.25		$	0.43

Non-recurring	$	0.07		$	0.08


(1)		The information presented above excludes activity for six properties classified as “held for disposition” at June 30, 2005.

(2)		Excludes development/renovation space.

(3)		Represents the difference between initial stabilized cash rents on new and renewal leases as compared to the expiring cash rents on the same space. For leases with reduced initial rents, the first month of full rent is used.

(4)		Represents cash rent growth adjusted for straight-line rents.

PORTFOLIO DIVERSIFICATION
As of June 30, 2005


						Percentage of
			Occupied			Total
	NAICS		Square			Occupied
North American Industrial Classification System Description	Code		Feet			Portfolio
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services		541		4,257,588			25.47	%
Finance and Insurance		521-525		2,961,366			17.71	%
Information		511-519		1,730,483			10.35	%
Manufacturing		311-339		1,539,619			9.21	%
Health Care and Social Assistance		621-624		1,046,246			6.26	%
Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services		561-562		675,379			4.04	%
Public Administration		921-928		670,065			4.00	%
Educational Services		611		720,238			4.31	%
Real Estate, Rental and Leasing		531-533		974,390			5.83	%
Wholesale Trade		423-425		442,320			2.64	%
Transportation and Warehousing		481-493		310,803			1.86	%
Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation		711-713		244,922			1.46	%
Construction		236-238		332,007			1.99	%
Accommodation and Food Services		721-722		206,797			1.24	%
Other Services (except Public Administration)		811-814		235,070			1.41	%
Retail Trade		441-454		201,704			1.21	%
Mining		211-213		2,894			0.02	%
Management of Companies and Enterprises		551		34,410			0.21	%
Utilities		221		8,975			0.05	%
Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting		111-115		3,595			0.02	%
Other — Uncategorized		—		118,200			0.71	%

				16,717,071	⁽¹⁾		100.00	%


(1)		Excludes square footage for tenants occupying six properties classified as “held for disposition” at June 30, 2005.

LEASE EXPIRATIONS — ANNUAL
As of June 30, 2005


																	2010 and
		2005			2006			2007			2008			2009			Thereafter
Los Angeles County:
West	Expiring SF ⁽¹⁾		214,856			645,722			704,041			706,244			715,612			2,108,416
	% of Leased SF ⁽²⁾		1.26	%		3.79	%		4.13	%		4.14	%		4.20	%		12.38	%
	Rent per SF ⁽³⁾	$	28.09		$	29.61		$	28.07		$	29.69		$	27.50		$	33.29
North	Expiring SF ⁽¹⁾		280,348			541,788			567,948			820,662			389,725			564,540
	% of Leased SF ⁽²⁾		1.64	%		3.18	%		3.34	%		4.82	%		2.29	%		3.32	%
	Rent per SF ⁽³⁾	$	23.18		$	23.93		$	23.38		$	24.69		$	25.01		$	23.34
South	Expiring SF ⁽¹⁾		179,384			218,827			222,580			320,025			287,901			972,913
	% of Leased SF ⁽²⁾		1.06	%		1.29	%		1.31	%		1.88	%		1.69	%		5.71	%
	Rent per SF ⁽³⁾	$	18.81		$	22.12		$	22.79		$	22.58		$	20.56		$	18.99

Subtotal — Los Angeles County	Expiring SF ⁽¹⁾		674,588			1,406,337			1,494,569			1,846,931			1,393,238			3,645,869
	% of Leased SF ⁽²⁾		3.96	%		8.26	%		8.78	%		10.84	%		8.18	%		21.41	%
	Rent per SF ⁽³⁾	$	23.58		$	26.26		$	25.50		$	26.24		$	25.37		$	27.93

Orange County	Expiring SF ⁽¹⁾		200,539			583,055			599,757			362,386			315,039			892,092
	% of Leased SF ⁽²⁾		1.18	%		3.42	%		3.52	%		2.13	%		1.85	%		5.24	%
	Rent per SF ⁽³⁾	$	21.28		$	20.78		$	18.37		$	19.93		$	21.16		$	24.16
San Diego County	Expiring SF ⁽¹⁾		265,979			484,614			373,123			504,901			353,906			764,299
	% of Leased SF ⁽²⁾		1.56	%		2.85	%		2.19	%		2.96	%		2.08	%		4.48	%
	Rent per SF ⁽³⁾	$	17.47		$	24.49		$	26.39		$	27.62		$	25.26		$	26.31
All Others	Expiring SF ⁽¹⁾		114,964			139,501			42,492			65,538			91,016			96,747
	% of Leased SF ⁽²⁾		0.68	%		0.82	%		0.25	%		0.39	%		0.53	%		0.57	%
	Rent per SF ⁽³⁾	$	20.29		$	21.15		$	20.99		$	21.97		$	18.03		$	22.69

Total Portfolio⁽⁴⁾	Expiring SF ⁽¹⁾		1,256,070			2,613,507			2,509,941			2,779,756			2,153,199			5,399,007

	% of Leased SF ⁽²⁾		7.38	%		15.35	%		14.74	%		16.32	%		12.64	%		31.70	%

	Rent per SF ⁽³⁾	$	21.62		$	24.44		$	23.85		$	25.57		$	24.43		$	26.99


(1)		Represents the square footage of expiring leases, not including month-to-month tenants.

(2)		Percentage of total rentable square footage expiring during the period.

(3)		Represents annualized ending cash rents of expiring leases.

(4)		Excludes six properties currently classified as “held for disposition” as of June 30, 2005.

QUARTERLY LEASE EXPIRATIONS — NEXT FOUR QUARTERS
As of June 30, 2005


		Q3-05			Q4-05			Q1-06			Q2-06
Los Angeles County:
West	Expiring SF ⁽¹⁾		65,863			148,993			208,450			65,387
	% of Leased SF ⁽²⁾		0.39	%		0.87	%		1.22	%		0.39	%
	Rent per SF ⁽³⁾	$	24.77		$	29.56		$	27.08		$	26.88
North	Expiring SF ⁽¹⁾		139,540			140,808			125,915			109,006
	% of Leased SF ⁽²⁾		0.82	%		0.82	%		0.74	%		0.64	%
	Rent per SF ⁽³⁾	$	22.40		$	23.95		$	23.58		$	23.83
South	Expiring SF ⁽¹⁾		96,716			82,668			37,102			77,117
	% of Leased SF ⁽²⁾		0.57	%		0.49	%		0.22	%		0.45	%
	Rent per SF ⁽³⁾	$	16.49		$	21.53		$	21.24		$	22.37

Subtotal — Los Angeles County	Expiring SF ⁽¹⁾		302,119			372,469			371,467			251,510
	% of Leased SF ⁽²⁾		1.78	%		2.18	%		2.18	%		1.48	%
	Rent per SF ⁽³⁾	$	21.03		$	25.66		$	25.31		$	24.18

Orange County	Expiring SF ⁽¹⁾		62,472			138,067			89,149			210,633
	% of Leased SF ⁽²⁾		0.37	%		0.81	%		0.53	%		1.24	%
	Rent per SF ⁽³⁾	$	21.65		$	21.11		$	15.00		$	20.64
San Diego County	Expiring SF ⁽¹⁾		107,512			158,467			97,614			136,848
	% of Leased SF ⁽²⁾		0.63	%		0.93	%		0.57	%		0.80	%
	Rent per SF ⁽³⁾	$	24.96		$	12.39		$	26.44		$	21.91
All Others	Expiring SF ⁽¹⁾		54,723			60,241			30,652			8,510
	% of Leased SF ⁽²⁾		0.32	%		0.36	%		0.18	%		0.05	%
	Rent per SF ⁽³⁾	$	20.12		$	20.45		$	20.01		$	19.68

Total Portfolio⁽⁴⁾	Expiring SF ⁽¹⁾		526,826			729,244			588,882			607,501

	% of Leased SF ⁽²⁾		3.10	%		4.28	%		3.46	%		3.57	%

	Rent per SF ⁽³⁾	$	21.81		$	21.48		$	23.66		$	22.38


(1)		Represents the square footage of expiring leases, not including month-to-month tenants.

(2)		Percentage of total rentable square footage expiring during the period.

(3)		Represents annualized ending cash rents of expiring leases.

(4)		Excludes six properties currently classified as “held for disposition” as of June 30, 2005.

Development

We have preliminary architectural designs completed for additional build-to-suit or multi-tenant projects at the Howard Hughes Center totaling approximately 475,000 net rentable square feet of office space. We also have construction entitlements at the Howard Hughes Center for a combination of up to 600 hotel rooms, apartments or condominiums. Build-to-suit projects consist of properties constructed to the tenant’s specifications in return for the tenant’s long-term commitment to the property.

Based on improving office trends in the West Los Angeles submarket and lack of new office supply scheduled to be delivered in the surrounding submarkets over the next 18-to-24 months, we intend to begin constructing a 160,000 square foot multi-tenant office building at our Howard Hughes Center later this year. We anticipate the permitting process to take approximately 4-to-6 months and the construction of the core and shell of the building an additional 18 months before the building is ready for occupancy.

In addition to our development at the Howard Hughes Center, we have completed preliminary designs and are marketing an approximate 170,000 square foot build-to-suit office building at our Long Beach Airport Business Park. Also, as part of our Gateway Towers acquisition in August 2002, we acquired a 5-acre developable land parcel in Torrance, California that we intend to market for a build-to-suit office building. We currently do not intend to commence construction on these projects until build-to-suit tenant leases are signed with terms allowing us to achieve yields commensurate with the project’s development risk.

We expect to finance our development/renovation activities over the next 24 months through net cash provided by operating activities, proceeds from asset sales, proceeds from our unsecured lines of credit or other secured borrowings.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market risk is the exposure or loss resulting from changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, commodity prices and equity prices. The primary market risk to which we are exposed is interest rate risk, which is sensitive to many factors, including governmental monetary and tax policies, domestic and international economic and political considerations and other factors that are beyond our control.

Interest Rate Risk

In order to modify and manage the interest characteristics of our outstanding debt and limit the effects of interest rates on our operations, we use a variety of financial instruments, including interest rate swaps, caps, floors and other interest rate exchange contracts. The use of these types of instruments to hedge our exposure to changes in interest rates carries additional risks such as counter-party credit risk. We do not enter into any transactions for speculative or trading purposes.

In February 2005, we settled $300 million of forward-starting swaps we entered into in 2004 in conjunction with a forecasted $300 million issuance of unsecured senior notes.

In conjunction with the extension of our $125 million unsecured term loan in February 2005, we also entered into a series of interest rate swap agreements to fix the interest rate through the extension period. Under these interest rate swap agreements, the interest rate on this loan is effectively fixed at 5.29% from June of 2006 through May of 2007, 5.55% from June of 2007 through November of 2008, 5.76% from December of 2008 through May of 2010 and 5.99% from June of 2010 through February of 2012.

In June 2005, we settled $100 million of fair value swaps we entered into in 2003 to float $100 million of the fixed interest rate associated with the 7.00% senior unsecured notes due in November of 2007.

Some of our future earnings, cash flows and fair values relating to financial instruments are dependent upon prevailing market rates of interest, such as LIBOR. Based on interest rates and outstanding balances as of June 30, 2005, a 1% increase in interest rates on our $246.0 million of floating rate debt would decrease annual future earnings and cash flows by approximately $2.5 million and would not have an impact on the fair value of the floating rate debt. Conversely, a 1% decrease in interest rates on our $246.0 million of floating rate debt would increase annual future earnings and cash flows by approximately $2.5 million and would not have an impact on the fair value of the floating rate debt. The weighted average interest rate on our floating debt as of June 30, 2005 was 4.84%.

Our fixed rate debt, including $175.0 million of floating rate debt swapped to fixed through interest rate hedges, totaled approximately $1.4 billion as of June 30, 2005 with a weighted average interest rate of 6.30% and a total fair value of approximately $1.4 billion. A 1% decrease in interest rates would increase the fair value of our fixed rate debt by approximately $57.1 million and would not have an impact on future earnings and cash flows. A 1% increase in interest rates would decrease the fair value of our fixed rated debt by approximately $53.5 million and would not have an impact on future earnings and cash flows.

These amounts are determined by considering the impact of hypothetical interest rates on our borrowing cost. These analyses do not consider the effects of the reduced level of overall economic activity that could exist in that environment. Further, in the event of a change of this magnitude, we would consider taking actions to further mitigate our exposure to the change. Due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, however, this sensitivity analysis assumes no changes in our capital structure.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including Arden Realty’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, our management was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide a reasonable level of assurance of reaching our desired disclosure control objectives.

As required by SEC Rule 13a-15(b), we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including Arden Realty’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the second quarter of 2005 covered by this report. Based on the foregoing, Arden Realty’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective and were operating at the reasonable assurance level.

There has been no change in our internal controls over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Part II OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds — None

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities — None

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders — None

Item 5. Other Information — None

Item 6. Exhibits


Exhibit
Number		Description
10.1		Amended and Restated Arden Realty Limited Partnership Deferred Compensation Plan, dated July 1, 2005, incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Arden Realty, Inc.’s current report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 24, 2005.

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certifications of Chief Financial Officer and Other Executive Officers pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.⁽¹⁾

32.2		Certifications of Chief Financial Officer and Other Executive Officers pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.⁽¹⁾


(1)		In accordance with SEC Release No. 33-8212, the following exhibit is being furnished, and is not being filed as part of this Report on Form 10-Q or as a separate disclosure document, and is not being incorporated by reference into any Securities Act of 1933 registration statement.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	ARDEN REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: ARDEN REALTY, INC. Its: General Partner

Date: August 5, 2005	By:	/s/ Robert C. Peddicord

		Robert C. Peddicord Executive Vice President, Leasing and Property Operations

Date: August 5, 2005	By:	/s/ Richard S. Davis

		Richard S. Davis Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

ARDEN REALTY LIMITED PARTNERSHIP 10-Q