EX-99.3 3 efc3-1181_5396060exh993.txt Exhibit 99.3 FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY Financial Statements December 31, 2002 and 2001 (With Independent Auditors' Report Thereon) FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY Table of Contents Page Independent Auditors' Report 1 Balance Sheets 2 Statements of Income 3 Statements of Stockholder's Equity 4 Statements of Cash Flows 5 Notes to Financial Statements 6 Independent Auditors' Report The Board of Directors and Stockholder Financial Guaranty Insurance Company: We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Financial Guaranty Insurance Company as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related statements of income, stockholder's equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Financial Guaranty Insurance Company as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2002 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ KPMG LLP New York, New York February 14, 2003

See accompanying notes to financial statements. 2

See accompanying notes to financial statements. 3

See accompanying notes to financial statements. 4

5 FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY Notes to Financial Statements December 31, 2002 and 2001 (1) Business Financial Guaranty Insurance Company (the Company) is a wholly owned insurance subsidiary of FGIC Corporation (the Parent). The Parent was owned approximately 99% by General Electric Capital Corporation (GE Capital) until late 2001 when it became a wholly owned subsidiary. The Company provides financial guarantee insurance on newly issued municipal bonds and municipal bonds trading in the secondary market, the latter including bonds held by unit investment trusts and mutual funds. The Company also insures structured debt issues outside the municipal market. Approximately 88% of the business written since inception by the Company has been municipal bond insurance. The Company insures only those securities that, in its judgment, are of investment grade quality. Municipal bond insurance written by the Company insures the full and timely payment of principal and interest when due on scheduled maturity, sinking fund, or other mandatory redemption and interest payment dates to the holders of municipal securities. The Company's insurance policies do not provide for accelerated payment of the principal of, or interest on, the bond insured in the case of a payment default. If the issuer of a Company-insured bond defaults on its obligation to pay debt service, the Company will make scheduled interest and principal payments as due and is subrogated to the rights of bondholders to the extent of payments made by it. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that effect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. (2) Significant Accounting Policies The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on the basis of GAAP which differ in certain respects from the accounting practices prescribed or permitted by regulatory authorities (see note 3). Significant accounting policies are as follows: (a) Investments Securities held as available-for-sale are recorded at fair value and unrealized holding gains/losses are recorded as a separate component of accumulated other comprehensive income, net of applicable income taxes. Short-term investments are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. Bond discounts and premiums are amortized over the remaining terms of the securities. Realized gains or losses on the sale of investments are determined on the basis of specific identification. Securities which have been determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired are reduced to realizable value - establishing a new cost basis - with a charge to earnings at such date. 6 (Continued) FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY Notes to Financial Statements December 31, 2002 and 2001 (b) Premium Revenue Recognition Premiums for policies where premiums are collected in a single payment at policy inception are earned over the period at risk, based on the total exposure outstanding at any point in time. Ceded premiums are earned in the same manner. Financial guarantee insurance policies exposure generally declines according to predetermined schedules. For policies with premiums that are collected periodically, premiums are reflected in income pro rata over the period covered by the premium payment. (c) Policy Acquisition Costs Policy acquisition costs include only those expenses that relate directly to premium production. Such costs include compensation of employees involved in underwriting, marketing and policy issuance functions, rating agency fees, state premium taxes, and certain other underwriting expenses, offset by ceding commission income on premiums ceded to reinsurers (see note 6). Net acquisition costs are deferred and amortized over the period in which the related premiums are earned. Anticipated loss and loss adjustment expenses and maintenance costs are considered in determining the recoverability of acquisition costs. (d) Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses Provision for loss and loss adjustment expenses includes principal and interest and other payments due under insured risks at the balance sheet date for which, in management's judgment, the likelihood of default is probable. Such reserves amounted to $47.9 million and $48.9 million at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, such reserves included $26.4 million and $36.2 million, respectively of reserves, established based upon an evaluation of the insured portfolio in light of current economic conditions and other relevant factors. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, discounted case-basis loss and loss adjustment expenses reserves were $21.5 million and $12.7 million, respectively. Loss and loss adjustment expenses included amounts discounted at an approximate interest rate of 3.4% in 2002 and 5.7% in 2001. The amount of the discount at December 31, 2002 and 2001 was $4.0 million and $5.9 million, respectively. The discount rate used is based upon the risk free rate for the average maturity of the applicable bond sector. The reserve for loss and loss adjustment expenses is necessarily based upon estimates; however, in management's opinion, the reserves for loss and loss adjustment expenses is adequate. However, actual results will likely differ from those estimates. (e) Income Taxes Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. These temporary differences relate principally to unrealized gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities available-for-sale; premium revenue recognition; deferred acquisition costs; discount on loss and loss adjustment reserves and portfolio loss reserves; AMT credit carry forwards; profit commission; and the rate differential on tax and loss bonds. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. 7 (Continued) FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY Notes to Financial Statements December 31, 2002 and 2001 Financial guarantee insurance companies are permitted to deduct from taxable income, subject to certain limitations, amounts added statutory contingency reserves (see note 3). The amounts deducted must be included in taxable income upon their release from the reserves. The amounts deducted are allowed as deductions from taxable income only to the extent that U.S. government non-interest bearing tax and loss bonds are purchased and held in an amount equal to the tax benefit attributable to such deductions. (f) Property and Equipment Property and equipment consists of office furniture, fixtures, computer equipment and software, and leasehold improvements which are recorded at cost and are charged to income over their estimated service lives. Office furniture and fixtures are depreciated straight-line over five years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over their estimated service life or over the life of the lease, whichever is shorter. Computer equipment and software are depreciated over three years. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. (g) Foreign Currency Translation The Company has established foreign branches in France and the United Kingdom and determined that the functional currencies of these branches are their local currencies. Accordingly, the assets and liabilities of these foreign branches are translated into U.S. dollars at the rates of exchange existing at December 31, 2002 and 2001 and revenues and expenses are translated at average monthly exchange rates. The cumulative translation loss gain (loss) at December 31, 2002 and 2001 was $(2,729,000) and $(47,000), respectively, net of tax, (expense) benefit of $1,470,000 and $25,000, respectively, and is reported as a separate component or accumulated other comprehensive income in the statement of stockholder's equity. (h) New Accounting Pronouncements The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued and then subsequently amended Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, effective for Financial Guaranty Insurance Company on January 1, 2001. Upon adoption of SFAS No. 133, all derivative instruments (including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts) are to be recognized in the balance sheet at their fair values; changes in such fair values must be recognized immediately in earnings unless specific hedging criteria are met. Management determined that at January 1, 2001, there was no effect on the Company's financial statements related to the adoption of SFAS 133. (i) Issued But Not Yet Implemented Accounting Pronouncements In January 2003, the FASB issued Financial Interpretation Number (FIN) 46, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, which the Company will adopt on July 1, 2003. FIN 46's consolidation criteria are based upon analysis of risks and rewards, not control, and represent a significant and complex modification of previous accounting principles. FIN 46 represents an accounting change not a change in the underlying economics associated with the transactions which may be affected by the Interpretation. FIN 46 clarifies the consolidation criteria for certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from 8 (Continued) FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY Notes to Financial Statements December 31, 2002 and 2001 other parties. FIN 46 requires variable interest entities to be consolidated by their primary beneficiaries if the entities do not effectively disperse risk among parties involved. Variable interest entities that effectively disperse risks will not be consolidated. FIN 46 requires disclosures for entities that have either a primary or significant variable interest in a variable interest entity. As a part of its structured finance business, the Company insures debt obligations or certificates issued by special purposes entities. At December 31, 2002, the Company had $1.4 billion of gross principal outstanding related to insurance contracts issued to commercial paper conduits - variable interest entities under FIN 46 - which the Company does not believe will require consolidation but which will require disclosure. With respect to the remainder of the structured finance transactions insured, the Company is continuing to evaluate the transactions, but does not currently believe any such transactions will require consolidation or disclosure under FIN 46. (3) Statutory Accounting Practices The financial statements are prepared on the basis of GAAP, which differs in certain respects from accounting practices prescribed or permitted by state insurance regulatory authorities. The National Association of Insurance Commissioners (NAIC) has approved the codification project (Codification) effective January 1, 2001 and the State of New York - the Company's state of domicile - has adopted certain but not all provisions of Codification. The Company has assessed the impact of Codification as adopted by its state of domicile (New York) on its statutory financial statements and it had no material effect on statutory capital and surplus. The following are the significant ways in which statutory basis accounting practices differ from GAAP: (a) premiums are earned directly in proportion to the scheduled principal and interest payments rather than in proportion to the total exposure outstanding at any point in time; (b) policy acquisition costs are charged to current operations as incurred rather than as related premiums are earned; (c) a contingency reserve is computed on the basis of statutory requirements for the security of all policyholders, regardless of whether loss contingencies actually exist, whereas under GAAP, a reserve is established based on an ultimate estimate of exposure; (d) certain assets designated as nonadmitted assets are charged directly against surplus but are reflected as assets under GAAP, if recoverable; (e) Beginning in 2002, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recorded on the statutory statement of admitted assets, liabilities, and capital and surplus under the asset and liability method of accounting subject to certain admissibility limitations for deferred tax assets. Additionally, for statutory basis accounting, the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities is recorded as a charge to statutory surplus rather than as a component of net income as is the case for GAAP. 9 (Continued) FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY Notes to Financial Statements December 31, 2002 and 2001 (f) purchases of tax and loss bonds are reflected as admitted assets, while under GAAP they are recorded as Federal income tax payments; (g) all fixed income investments are carried at amortized cost rather than at fair value for securities classified as available-for-sale under GAAP; (h) profit commissions are recognized as received while under GAAP management's best estimate of the Company's ultimate recoverable is accrued; and (i) case reserves are discounted at the average investment portfolio yield for statutory purposes and at the risk free rate under GAAP. The following is a reconciliation of net income and stockholder's equity presented on a GAAP basis to the corresponding amounts reported on a statutory basis for the periods indicated below (in thousands):

(4) Investments Investments in fixed maturity securities carried at fair value of $3.9 million and $3.5 million as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively, were on deposit with various regulatory authorities as required by law. 10 (Continued) FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY Notes to Financial Statements December 31, 2002 and 2001 The amortized cost and fair values of short-term investments and of investments in fixed maturity securities and preferred stock classified as available-for-sale are as follows (in thousands) as of December 31:

FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY Notes to Financial Statements December 31, 2002 and 2001 The amortized cost and fair values of short-term investments and of investments in fixed maturity securities - including preferred stock - available-for-sale at December 31, 2002, by contractual maturity date, are shown below (in thousands). Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY Notes to Financial Statements December 31, 2002 and 2001 As of December 31, 2002, the Company did not have more than 3% of its investment portfolio concentrated in a single issuer or industry; however, the Company had the following exposures by state: Fair value ------------------ New York $ 270,799 Texas 269,916 Illinois 174,435 Florida 161,092 Michigan 149,925 New Jersey 129,745 Colorado 89,149 Maryland 77,292 Pennsylvania 66,854 Massachusetts 66,336 ------------------ 1,455,543 All other 1,413,073 ------------------ $ 2,868,616 ================== (5) Income Taxes The Company files its Federal tax return as part of the consolidated return of General Electric Capital Corporation (GE Capital). Under the tax sharing agreement with GE Capital, tax is allocated to the Company and the Parent based upon their respective contributions to consolidated net income. The Company also has a separate tax sharing agreement with its Parent. The Company's effective Federal corporate tax rate (25.8% in 2002, 23.3% in 2001, and 17.4% in 2000) is less than the corporate tax rate on ordinary income of 35% in 2002, 2001, and 2000, primarily due to tax-exempt interest on municipal investments. The following is a reconciliation of Federal income taxes computed at the statutory rate and the provision for Federal income taxes (in thousands):

FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY Notes to Financial Statements December 31, 2002 and 2001 The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the net deferred tax liability at December 31, 2002 and 2001 are presented below (in thousands):

Based upon the level of historical taxable income, projections of future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible and the estimated reversal of future taxable temporary differences, the Company believes it is more likely than not that it will realize the benefits of these deductible differences and has not established a valuation allowance at December 31, 2002 and 2001. The Company anticipates that the related deferred tax asset will be realized based on future profitable business. Total Federal income tax payments during 2002, 2001, and 2000 were $90.1 million, $38.3 million, and $22.6 million, respectively. (6) Reinsurance The Company reinsures portions of its risk with other insurance companies through quota share reinsurance treaties and, where warranted, on a facultative basis. This process serves to limit the Company's exposure on risks underwritten. In the event that any or all of the reinsuring companies were unable to meet their obligations, the Company would be liable for such defaulted amounts. The Company evaluates the financial condition of its reinsurers and monitors concentrations of credit risk arising from 14 (Continued) FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY Notes to Financial Statements December 31, 2002 and 2001 activities or economic characteristics of the reinsurers to minimize its exposure to significant losses from reinsurer insolvencies. The Company holds collateral under reinsurance agreements in the form of letters of credit and trust agreements in various amounts with various reinsurers totaling $66.4 million at December 31, 2002 that can be drawn on in the event of default. Net premiums earned are presented net of ceded earned premiums of $27.0 million, $20.6 million, and $19.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. Loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred are presented net of ceded losses of $0.8 million, $0.7 million, and $1.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. At December 31, 2002 and 2001, ceded case reserves were $3.0 million and $2.1 million, respectively. Ceded portfolio reserves were $5.4 million at December 31, 2002 and 2001. In accordance with an amendment to an existing reinsurance agreement, the Company received additional ceding commission income of $3.3 million in 2000 from the reinsurer. In addition, the Company bought back $2.6 million and $4.8 million of ceded premium in 2002 and 2001, respectively, from the reinsurers and subsequently ceded the risk to a different reinsurer. (7) Loss and Loss Adjustment Expenses Activity in the reserve for loss and loss adjustment expenses is summarized as follows (in thousands):

FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY Notes to Financial Statements December 31, 2002 and 2001 During 2002, the decrease in the incurred portfolio reserve and the increase in the case reserves principally related to the establishment of case reserves on several structured finance transactions of one particular issuer. Certain transactions related to the issuer were identified as potential problem credits in 2000 and 2001 and case reserves were established during those years. In 2000 the Company also increased its portfolio reserves related to such transactions. In 2002, there was further adverse development on such transactions and a determination was made by management that several other transactions related to that issuer also required case reserves. (8) Related Party Transactions The Company has various agreements with subsidiaries of General Electric Company (GE) and GE Capital. These business transactions include appraisal fees and due diligence costs associated with underwriting structured finance mortgage-backed security business; certain payroll and office expenses incurred but processed by a GE subsidiary; investment fees pertaining to the management of the Company's investment portfolio; and telecommunication service charges. Approximately $2.2 million, $1.2 million, and $1.3 million in expenses were incurred in 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively, related to such transactions. The Company also insured certain nonmunicipal issues with GE Capital involvement as sponsor of the insured securitization and/or servicer of the underlying assets. For some of these issues, GE Capital also provides first loss protection in the event of default. Gross premiums written on these issues amounted to $.05 million in 2002, $0.1 million in 2001, and $0.3 million in 2000. As of December 31, 2002, par outstanding on these deals before reinsurance was $80.9 million. The Company insures bond issues and securities in trusts that were sponsored by affiliates of GE (approximately 1% of gross premiums written) in 2002, 2001, and 2000. (9) Compensation Plans Officers and other key employees of the Company participate in the Parent's incentive compensation, deferred compensation, and profit sharing plans. Expenses incurred by the Company under compensation plans and bonuses amounted to $3.8 million, $2.7 million, and $2.5 million in 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. (10) Dividends Under New York insurance law, the Company may pay a dividend only from earned surplus subject to the following limitations: (a) statutory surplus after such dividend may not be less than the minimum required paid-in capital, which was $72.5 million in 2002 and 2001, and (b) dividends may not exceed the lesser of 10% of its surplus or 100% of adjusted net investment income, as defined by New York insurance law, for the twelve-month period ending on the preceding December 31, without the prior approval of the Superintendent of the New York State Insurance Department. At December 31, 2002, $97.8 million in dividends were available for payment in 2003 without prior approval of the New York State Insurance Department. During 2002 and 2001, the Company declared dividends of $100.0 million and $200.0 million, respectively. The $200.0 million in dividends declared in 2001 were approved by the New York State Insurance Department as an extraordinary dividend. 16 (Continued) FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY Notes to Financial Statements December 31, 2002 and 2001 (11) Financial Instruments (a) Fair Value of Financial Instruments The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating fair values of financial instruments: Fixed Maturity Securities and Preferred Stock: Fair values for fixed maturity securities and preferred stock are based on quoted market prices, if available. If a quoted market price is not available, fair values are estimated using quoted market prices for similar securities. Fair value disclosure for fixed maturity securities and preferred stock are included in the balance sheets and in note 4. Short-Term Investments: Short-term investments are carried at cost, which approximates fair value. Cash, Accrued Investment Income, Prepaid Expenses and Other Assets, Ceded Reinsurance Balances Payable, Accounts Payable and Accrued Expense, and Payable for Securities Purchased: The carrying amounts of these items approximate their fair values. The estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments at December 31, 2002 and 2001 are as follows (in thousands):

Financial Guarantees: The carrying value of the Company's financial guarantees is represented by the unearned premium reserve, net of deferred acquisition costs, and loss and loss adjustment expense reserves. Estimated fair values of these guarantees are based on amounts currently charged to enter into similar agreements (net of applicable ceding commission), discounted cash flows (5% discount rate at December 31, 2002 and 2001) considering contractual revenues to be received adjusted for expected prepayments, the present value of future obligations and estimated losses, and current interest rates. The estimated fair values of such financial guarantees range between $603.2 million and $664.0 million compared to a carrying value of $521.5 million as of December 31, 2002 and between $449.6 million and $494.7 million compared to a carrying value of $450.0 million as of December 31, 2001. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, the net present value of future installment premiums was $100.2 million and $105.7 million, respectively, discounted at 5% at December 31, 2002 and 2001. 17 (Continued) FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY Notes to Financial Statements December 31, 2002 and 2001 (b) Concentrations of Credit Risk The Company considers its role in providing insurance to be credit enhancement rather than credit substitution. The Company insures only those securities that, in its judgment, are of investment grade quality. The Company has established and maintains its own underwriting standards that are based on those aspects of credit that the Company deems important for the particular category of obligations considered for insurance. Credit criteria include economic and social trends, debt management, financial management and legal and administrative factors, the adequacy of anticipated cash flows, including the historical and expected performance of assets pledged for payment of securities under varying economic scenarios and underlying levels of protection such as insurance or over collateralization. In connection with underwriting new issues, the Company sometimes requires, as a condition to insuring an issue, that collateral be pledged or, in some instances, that a third-party guarantee be provided for a term of the obligation insured by a party of acceptable credit quality obligated to make payment prior to any payment by the Company. The types and extent of collateral pledged varies, but may include residential and commercial mortgages, corporate debt, government debt, and consumer receivables. As of December 31, 2002, the Company's total insured principal exposure to credit loss in the event of default by bond issues was $188.0 billion, net of reinsurance of $37.4 billion. The Company's insured portfolio as of December 31, 2002 was broadly diversified by geography and bond market sector with no single debt issuer representing more than 1% of the Company's principal exposure outstanding, net of reinsurance. As of December 31, 2002, the composition of principal exposure by type of issue, net of reinsurance, was as follows (in millions): Net principal outstanding ------------------- Municipal: General obligation $ 91,808 Special revenue 78,915 Industrial revenue 341 Nonmunicipal 16,893 ------------------- Total $ 187,957 =================== 18 (Continued) FINANCIAL GUARANTY INSURANCE COMPANY Notes to Financial Statements December 31, 2002 and 2001 As of December 31, 2002, the composition of principal exposure ceded to reinsurers was as follows (in millions): Ceded principal outstanding ------------------- Reinsurer: Ace Guarantee Re, Inc. $ 11,646 Radian Reinsurance Company 7,809 Axa Re Finance 5,220 American Re-Insurance Company 4,926 Other 7,872 ------------------- Total $ 37,473 =================== The Company did not have recoverables in excess of 3% of equity from any single reinsurer. The Company's gross and net exposure outstanding, which includes principal and interest, was $384.6 billion and $317.0 billion, respectively, as of December 31, 2002. The Company is authorized to do business in 50 states, the District of Columbia, and in the United Kingdom and France. Principal exposure outstanding at December 31, 2002 by state, net of reinsurance, was as follows (in millions): Net principal outstanding ------------------- California $ 20,809 New York 17,242 Pennsylvania 15,426 Florida 15,039 Illinois 13,322 Texas 9,896 Michigan 7,522 New Jersey 7,493 Massachusetts 5,528 Washington 5,050 ------------------- Sub-total 117,327 Other states 70,472 International 158 ------------------- Total $ 187,957 =================== 19 (Continued) (12) Commitments Total rent expense was $4.3 million, $2.2 million, and $2.4 million in 2002, 2001, and 2000, respectively. The minimum future rental payments under noncancelable operating leases, net of subleases, having remaining terms in excess of one year approximate (in thousands): Amount ------------------- Year: 2003 $ 2,770 2004 2,770 2005 2,770 2006 2,770 ------------------- Total minimum future rental payments $ 11,080 =================== (13) Comprehensive Income Comprehensive income requires that an enterprise (a) classify items of other comprehensive income by their nature in a financial statement and (b) display the accumulated balance of other comprehensive income separately from retained earnings and additional paid-in capital in the equity section of a statement of financial position. Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) of the Company consists of net unrealized gains on investment securities and foreign currency translation adjustments. The following are the reclassification adjustments for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001, and 2000 (in thousands):

REVOLVING HOME EQUITY LOAN ASSET BACKED NOTES SERIES 2002-F 10-K/A