UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549

FORM 10-D

ASSET BACKED ISSUER
DISTRIBUTION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the monthly distribution period from: ~~October~~November 19, 2021 to ~~November~~December 1817, 2021

Commission File Number of issuing entity: 333-172366-03

Central Index Key Number of issuing entity: 0001553817

WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C8
(Exact name of issuing entity as specified in its charter)

Commission File Number of depositor: 333-172366

Central Index Key Number of depositor: 0000850779

Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc.
(Exact name of depositor as specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of sponsor (if applicable): 0000740906

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
(Exact name of sponsor as specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of sponsor (if applicable): 0001541214

C-III Commercial Mortgage LLC
(Exact name of sponsor as specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of sponsor (if applicable): 0000729153

NatWest Markets Plc (formerly known as The Royal Bank of Scotland plc)
(Exact name of sponsor as specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of sponsor (if applicable): 0001542105

Basis Real Estate Capital II, LLC
(Exact name of sponsor as specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of sponsor (if applicable): 0001555501

Liberty Island Group I LLC
(Exact name of sponsor as specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of sponsor (if applicable): 0001541615

RBS Financial Products Inc.
(Exact name of sponsor as specified in its charter)

Anthony J. Sfarra (212) 214-5600
(Name and telephone number, including area code, of the person to contact in connection with this filing)

New York
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization of the issuing entity)

38-3880099
38-3880100
38-3880101
38-7047698
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

c/o Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as agent for
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
9062 Old Annapolis Road
Columbia, MD 21045
(Address of principal executive offices of the issuing entity) (Zip Code)

(410) 884-2000
(Telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable
(Former name, former address, if changed since last report)

Registered/reporting pursuant to (check one)

Title of Class	Section 12(b)	Section 12(g)	Section 15(d)	Name of Exchange (If Section 12(b))
A-1			X
A-2			X
A-3			X
A-SB			X
A-S			X
B			X
C			X

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No

Part I - DISTRIBUTION INFORMATION

Item 1. Distribution and Pool Performance Information.

On ~~November~~December 1817, 2021 a distribution was made to holders of the certificates issued by WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C8.

The distribution report is attached as an Exhibit to this Form 10-D, please see Item 10(b), Exhibit 99.1 for the related information.

The following table presents the loss information for the trust assets for the WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C8 in accordance with Item 1100(b) as required by Item 1121(a)(9) of Regulation AB:

Loss Information as reported on NovemberDecember 1817, 2021

Number of Delinquencies 30+ days	% of Delinquencies 30+ days by Pool Balance	Number of Loans/REOs with Losses	Average Net Loss
2	7.79%	1	$26,688.82
1	0.80%	1	$26,688.82

No assets securitized by Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. (the "Depositor") and held by WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C8 were the subject of a demand to repurchase or replace for breach of the representations and warranties contained in the underlying transaction documents during the monthly distribution period from ~~October~~November 19, 2021 to ~~November~~December 1817, 2021.

The Depositor filed its most recent Form ABS-15G in accordance with Rule 15Ga-1 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (a "Rule 15Ga-1 Form ABS-15G") on November 9, 2021. The CIK number for the Depositor is 0000850779.

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association ("Wells Fargo"), one of the sponsors, most recently filed a Rule 15Ga-1 Form ABS-15G on November 9, 2021. The Central Index Key number for Wells Fargo is 0000740906.

C-III Commercial Mortgage LLC ("C-III"), one of the sponsors, most recently filed a Rule 15Ga-1 Form ABS-15G on February 12, 2021. The Central Index Key number for C-III is 0001541214.

NatWest Markets Plc (formerly known as The Royal Bank of Scotland plc) ("NatWest plc"), one of the sponsors and mortgage loan sellers, most recently filed a Form ABS-15G on May 16, 2017. The CIK number for NatWest plc is 0000729153.

Basis Real Estate Capital II, LLC ("Basis"), one of the sponsors, most recently filed a Rule 15Ga-1 Form ABS-15G on February 12, 2021. The Central Index Key number for Basis is 0001542105.

Liberty Island Group I LLC ("LIG I"), one of the sponsors, most recently filed a Rule 15Ga-1 Form ABS-15G on February 16, 2021. The Central Index Key number for LIG I is 0001555501.

RBS Financial Products Inc. ("RBSFP"), one of the sponsors, most recently filed a Rule 15Ga-1 Form ABS-15G on November 15, 2021. The Central Index Key number for RBSFP is 0001541615.

Part II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 2. Legal Proceedings.

~~Wells~~Disclosure ~~Fargo~~from Bank: In December 2014, Phoenix Light SF Limited and certain related entities and the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) filed complaints in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York against Wells Fargo Bank, alleging claims against Wells Fargo Bank in its capacity as trustee for a number of residential mortgage-backed securities trusts. Complaints raising similar allegations have been filed by Commerzbank AG in the Southern District of New York and by IKB International and IKB Deutsche ~~Industriebank in New York state court. In each case, the plaintiffs allege that Wells Fargo~~ Bank, asTrust ~~trustee,~~Company ~~caused losses to investors~~Americas, and plaintiffs assert causes of action based upon, among other things, the trustee’s alleged failure to notify and enforce repurchase obligations of mortgage loan sellers for purported breaches of representations and warranties, notify investors of alleged events of default, and abide by appropriate standards of care following alleged events of default. Wells Fargo Bank previously settled two class action lawsuits with similar allegations that were filed in November 2014 and December 2016 by institutional investors in the Southern District of New York and New York state court, respectively. In addition, Park Royal I LLC and Park Royal II LLC have filed complaints in New York state court alleging Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as ~~trustee,~~ ~~failed to take appropriate actions upon learning of defective mortgage loan documentation. In March 2021, the Company entered into an agreement to resolve the case filed by the NCUA.~~trustee:

InDeutsche ~~addition~~Bank toTrust ~~the~~Company ~~foregoing~~Americas ~~cases, in August 2014 and August 2015 Nomura Credit & Capital Inc.~~ (“~~Nomura~~DBTCA”) and ~~Natixis~~Deutsche ~~Real~~Bank ~~Estate~~National Trust ~~Holdings,~~Company ~~LLC~~ (“~~Natixis~~DBNTC”) ~~filed~~have abeen ~~total~~sued ofby ~~seven third-party~~investors ~~complaints against Wells Fargo Bank~~ in ~~New~~civil ~~York~~litigation ~~state court. In the~~concerning ~~underlying~~their ~~first-party~~role ~~actions,~~as ~~Nomura~~trustees ~~and Natixis have been sued for alleged breaches~~ of ~~representations~~certain ~~and warranties made in connection with~~ residential mortgage-backed securities ~~sponsored by them. In the third-party actions,~~ ~~Nomura~~(“RMBS”) and Natixis allege that Wells Fargo Bank, as master servicer, primary servicer or securities administrator, failed to notify Nomura and Natixis of their own breaches, failed to properly oversee the primary servicers, and failed to adhere to accepted servicing practicestrusts. Natixis additionally alleges that Wells Fargo Bank failed to perform default oversight duties. Wells Fargo Bank has asserted counterclaims alleging that Nomura and Natixis failed to provide Wells Fargo Bank notice of their representation and warranty breaches.

~~With~~On ~~respect~~June to18, ~~each~~2014, a group of ~~the~~investors, ~~foregoing~~including ~~litigations~~funds managed by Blackrock Advisors, ~~Wells~~LLC, PIMCO-Advisors, L.P., and others, filed an action against DBNTC ~~Fargo~~and ~~Bank~~DBTCA ~~believes~~in ~~plaintiffs'~~New ~~claims~~York ~~are~~State ~~without~~Supreme ~~merit~~Court alleging that DBNTC and ~~intends~~DBTCA failed to ~~contest the~~perform ~~claims~~purported ~~vigorously~~duties, ~~but~~as ~~there~~trustees ~~can~~for be544 noprivate-label ~~assurances~~RMBS trusts, to enforce breaches of representations and warranties as to mortgage loans held by the ~~outcome~~trusts and to enforce breaches by servicers of their mortgage loan servicing obligations for the trusts. During the course of the litigation, ~~litigations~~plaintiffs ordismissed the ~~possible~~case ~~impact~~from New York State Supreme Court and refiled two separate cases, one in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the ~~litigations~~“BlackRock onSDNY ~~Wells~~Case”) ~~Fargo~~and ~~Bank~~the orother in the Superior Court of California, Orange County (the ~~related~~“BlackRock ~~RMBS~~California ~~trusts~~Case”). Pursuant to a settlement among the parties, the BlackRock SDNY Case was dismissed on December 6, 2018 and the BlackRock California Case was dismissed on January 11, 2019.

~~Disclosure~~On ~~from~~September ~~Deutsche~~27, ~~Bank~~2017, ~~Trust~~DBTCA was added as a defendant to a case brought by ~~Company~~certain ~~Americas~~special purpose entities including Phoenix Light SF Limited in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, in which the plaintiffs previously alleged incorrectly that DBNTC served as trustee: for all 43 of the trusts at issue. On September 27, 2017, plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint that names DBTCA as a defendant in addition to DBNTC. DBTCA serves as trustee for one of the 43 trusts at issue. DBNTC serves as trustee for the other 42 trusts at issue. Plaintiffs’ third amended complaint brings claims for violation of the U.S. Trust Indenture Act of 1939 (“TIA”); breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; negligence and gross negligence; violation of the New York Streit Act (“Streit Act”); and breach of the covenant of good faith. However, in the third amended complaint, plaintiffs acknowledge that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the court dismissed plaintiffs’ TIA claims, negligence and gross negligence claims, Streit Act claims, claims for breach of the covenant of good faith, and certain theories of plaintiffs’ breach of contract claims, and plaintiffs only include these claims to preserve any rights on appeal. Plaintiffs allege damages of “hundreds of millions of dollars.” On November 13, 2017, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the third amended complaint. On December 7, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion for summary judgment. Also on December 7, 2018, plaintiffs, jointly with Commerzbank AG (see description of Commerzbank case below), filed a motion for partial summary judgment. As of March 8, 2019, both motions for summary judgment were fully briefed. As of November 14, 2021, they were still awaiting decision by the court. On October 27, 2021, pursuant to a court order permitting DBNTC and DBTCA to file a supplemental motion for summary judgment relating to plaintiffs’ standing, DBNTC and DBTCA filed such a motion, which has been briefed and is awaiting decision by the court. Discovery is ongoing.

~~Deutsche~~On ~~Bank~~November ~~Trust~~30, ~~Company~~2017, ~~Americas~~DBTCA was added as a defendant to a case brought by Commerzbank AG (“~~DBTCA~~Commerzbank”) ~~and~~in ~~Deutsche~~the U.S. District Court for the Southern District ~~Bank~~of ~~National~~New ~~Trust~~York, ~~Company~~in (“which Commerzbank previously alleged incorrectly that DBNTC”) served ~~have~~as ~~been~~trustee ~~sued~~for byall ~~investors~~50 of the trusts at issue. On November 30, 2017, Commerzbank filed a second amended complaint that names DBTCA as a defendant in addition ~~civil~~to DBNTC. DBTCA serves as trustee for 1 of the 50 trusts at issue. ~~litigation~~DBNTC ~~concerning~~serves ~~their~~as ~~role~~trustee for the other 49 trusts at issue. Commerzbank’s second amended complaint brings claims for violation of the TIA; breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; negligence; violation of the Streit Act; and breach of the covenant of good faith. However, in the second amended complaint, Commerzbank acknowledges that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the court dismissed Commerzbank’s TIA claims for the trusts governed by pooling and servicing agreements, as ~~trustees~~well as its Streit Act claims and claims for breach of the ~~certain~~covenant ~~residential~~of good faith, and Commerzbank only includes these claims to ~~mortgage-backed~~preserve ~~securities~~any (rights on appeal. The second amended complaint alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA caused Commerzbank to suffer “~~RMBS~~hundreds of millions of dollars in losses,”) ~~trusts~~but the complaint does not include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. On January 29, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the second amended complaint. On December 7, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion for summary judgment. Also on December 7, 2018, Commerzbank, jointly with the Phoenix Light plaintiffs, filed a motion for partial summary judgment. As of March 8, 2019, both motions for summary judgment were fully briefed. As of November 14, 2021, they were still awaiting decision by the court. Discovery is ongoing.

On ~~June~~December 1830, ~~2014~~2015, IKB International, S.A. in Liquidation and IKB Deutsche Industriebank A.G. (collectively, “IKB”), as an investor in 37 RMBS trusts, filed a ~~group~~summons with notice in the Supreme Court of the State of New ~~investors~~York, ~~including~~New ~~funds~~York ~~managed~~County, byagainst ~~Blackrock~~DBNTC ~~Advisors~~and DBTCA as trustees of the trusts. On May 27, ~~LLC~~2016, ~~PIMCO-Advisors~~IKB served its complaint asserting claims for breach of contract, ~~L.P.~~breach of fiduciary duty, ~~and~~breach ~~others~~of duty to avoid conflicts of interest, violation ~~filed~~of anthe ~~action~~Streit ~~against~~Act, violation of the TIA, violation of Regulation AB, and violation of Section 9 of the Uniform Commercial Code. IKB alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA inare ~~New~~liable ~~York~~for ~~State Supreme~~over ~~Court~~U.S. ~~alleging~~$268 ~~that~~million in damages. On October 5, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA, ~~failed~~together with several other trustees defending lawsuits by IKB, filed a joint motion to ~~perform~~dismiss. ~~purported~~On ~~duties~~January 6, 2017, IKB filed a notice asof ~~trustees~~discontinuance, ~~for~~voluntarily ~~544~~dismissing ~~private-label~~with ~~RMBS~~prejudice all claims as to three trusts. On June 20, to2017, ~~enforce~~the ~~breaches~~parties offiled a stipulation, voluntarily ~~representations~~dismissing ~~and~~with ~~warranties~~prejudice all claims as to ~~mortgage~~four ~~loans~~additional ~~held~~trusts. byOn January 27, 2021, the ~~trusts~~court granted in part and denied in part DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion to dismiss. The court granted the motion to dismiss with respect to IKB’s ~~enforce~~claims ~~breaches~~for byviolations ~~servicers~~of the Streit Act, Regulation AB, and Section 9 of ~~their~~the Uniform ~~mortgage~~Commercial ~~loan~~Code, ~~servicing~~as ~~obligations~~well as certain aspects of IKB’s claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, and violation of the ~~trusts~~TIA. ~~During~~ The court denied the ~~course~~remainder of the ~~litigation,~~motion ~~plaintiffs~~to ~~dismissed~~dismiss. ~~the~~IKB’s remaining claims for ~~case~~breach ~~from~~of ~~New~~contract, ~~York~~breach ~~State~~of ~~Supreme~~fiduciary ~~Court~~duty, ~~and~~breach ~~refiled~~of ~~two~~duty ~~separate~~to ~~cases~~avoid conflicts of interest, ~~one~~and in violation of the UTIA will proceed.S. ~~District~~On ~~Court~~May ~~for~~10, ~~the~~2021, ~~Southern~~DBNTC ~~District~~and DBTCA filed a notice of appeal with the New York ~~(the~~Supreme ~~“BlackRock~~Court Appellate ~~SDNY~~Division, ~~Case”)~~First ~~and~~Department, regarding certain aspects of the ~~other~~court’s inorder on the ~~Superior~~motion ~~Court~~to ofdismiss. ~~California~~On May 20, ~~Orange~~2021, IKB filed a notice of cross appeal with ~~County~~respect ~~(the~~to ~~“BlackRock~~other ~~California~~aspects ~~Case”)~~of that order. ~~Pursuant~~ toOn June 2, 2021, IKB filed a ~~settlement~~motion for ~~among~~re-argument ~~the~~regarding ~~parties~~certain aspects of that order, which the ~~BlackRock~~court ~~SDNY~~denied ~~Case~~on August ~~was~~3, ~~dismissed~~2021. On onMay ~~December~~13, 62021, ~~2018~~ DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the complaint. On ~~BlackRock~~October ~~California~~28, ~~Case~~2021, ~~was~~the ~~dismissed~~parties onfiled ~~January~~a 11stipulation, voluntarily ~~2019~~dismissing with prejudice all claims as to seven additional trusts. Discovery is ongoing.

OnIt ~~September~~is ~~27, 2017,~~ DBTCA’s ~~was added~~belief asthat ait ~~defendant~~has tono apending ~~case~~legal ~~brought~~proceedings ~~by certain special purpose entities~~ (including ~~Phoenix Light SF Limited in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York~~, ~~in which the plaintiffs previously alleged incorrectly~~ ~~that~~based ~~DBNTC~~on ~~served as trustee for all 43 of the trusts at issue. On September 27, 2017, plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint that names~~ DBTCA ~~as a defendant in addition to DBNTC. DBTCA serves as trustee for one of the 43 trusts at issue. DBNTC serves as trustee for the other 42 trusts at issue. Plaintiffs~~’s ~~third~~present ~~amended~~evaluation, ~~complaint brings claims for violation of~~ the ~~U.S.~~litigation ~~Trust~~disclosed ~~Indenture~~in ~~Act of 1939 (“TIA”); breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; negligence and gross negligence; violation of~~ the ~~New York~~foregoing ~~Streit Act (“Streit Act”~~paragraphs); ~~and breach of the covenant of good faith. However, in the third amended complaint, plaintiffs acknowledge~~ that, ~~before DBTCA~~would ~~was~~materially ~~added~~affect toits ~~the~~ability case, the court dismissed plaintiffs’ TIA claims, negligence and gross negligence claims, Streit Act claims, claims for breach of the covenant of good faith, and certain theories of plaintiffs’ breach of contract claims, and plaintiffs only include these claims to ~~preserve~~perform ~~any~~its ~~rights on~~duties ~~appeal. Plaintiffs~~under ~~allege damages of “hundreds of millions of dollars.” On November 13, 2017, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to~~ the ~~third~~ ~~amended~~Pooling ~~complaint. On December 7, 2018, DBNTC~~ and ~~DBTCA~~Servicing ~~filed~~Agreement ~~a motion~~ for ~~summary~~this ~~judgment~~transaction. Also on December 7, 2018, plaintiffs, jointly with Commerzbank AG (see description of Commerzbank case below), filed a motion for partial summary judgment. As of March 8, 2019, both motions for summary judgment were fully briefed. As of November 14, 2021, they were still awaiting decision by the court. On October 27, 2021, pursuant to a court order permitting DBNTC and DBTCA to file a supplemental motion for summary judgment relating to plaintiffs’ standing, DBNTC and DBTCA filed such a motion, which the parties are currently briefing. Discovery is ongoing.

OnItem ~~November 30, 2017, DBTCA was added as a defendant to a case brought by Commerzbank AG (“Commerzbank”) in the U~~6.~~S. District~~ ~~Court~~Significant ~~for~~Obligors ~~the Southern District~~ of ~~New~~Pool ~~York, in which Commerzbank previously alleged incorrectly that DBNTC served as trustee for all 50 of the trusts at issue~~Assets. On November 30, 2017, Commerzbank filed a second amended complaint that names DBTCA as a defendant in addition to DBNTC. DBTCA serves as trustee for 1 of the 50 trusts at issue. DBNTC serves as trustee for the other 49 trusts at issue. Commerzbank’s second amended complaint brings claims for violation of the TIA; breach of contract; breach of fiduciary duty; negligence; violation of the Streit Act; and breach of the covenant of good faith. However, in the second amended complaint, Commerzbank acknowledges that, before DBTCA was added to the case, the court dismissed Commerzbank’s TIA claims for the trusts governed by pooling and servicing agreements, as well as its Streit Act claims and claims for breach of the covenant of good faith, and Commerzbank only includes these claims to preserve any rights on appeal. The second amended complaint alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA caused Commerzbank to suffer “hundreds of millions of dollars in losses,” but the complaint does not include a demand for money damages in a sum certain. On January 29, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the second amended complaint. On December 7, 2018, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a motion for summary judgment. Also on December 7, 2018, Commerzbank, jointly with the Phoenix Light plaintiffs, filed a motion for partial summary judgment. As of March 8, 2019, both motions for summary judgment were fully briefed. As of November 14, 2021, they were still awaiting decision by the court. Discovery is ongoing.

OnThe ~~December~~100 ~~30,~~Church ~~2015,~~Street ~~IKB International,~~mortgage ~~S.A.~~loan inconstitutes ~~Liquidation and IKB Deutsche Industriebank A.G. (collectively, “IKB”), as an investor in 37 RMBS trusts, filed~~ a ~~summons with~~ ~~notice~~significant inobligor ~~the~~within ~~Supreme Court of~~ the ~~State~~meaning of ~~New~~Item ~~York,~~1101(k)(2) ~~New York County, against DBNTC and DBTCA as trustees~~ of the trusts. On May 27, 2016, IKB served its complaint asserting claims for breach of contract, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest, violation of the Streit Act, violation of the TIA, violation of Regulation AB, ~~and violation of Section 9 of~~as ~~the~~disclosed ~~Uniform Commercial Code. IKB alleges that DBNTC and DBTCA are liable for over U.S. $268 million~~ in ~~damages.~~the OnProspectus ~~October~~Supplement ~~5, 2016, DBNTC and DBTCA, together with several other trustees defending lawsuits by IKB,~~ filed ~~a joint motion to dismiss. On January 6, 2017, IKB filed a notice of discontinuance, voluntarily dismissing~~ with ~~prejudice all claims as to three trusts. On June 20, 2017,~~ the ~~parties~~SEC ~~filed~~on aJuly ~~stipulation~~31, ~~voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to four additional trusts~~2012. ~~On January 27, 2021, the~~In ~~court~~accordance ~~granted in part and denied in part DBNTC and DBTCA’s motion to dismiss. The court granted the motion to dismiss~~ with ~~respect~~Item to1112(b) ~~IKB’s claims for violations~~ of ~~the Streit Act,~~ Regulation AB, ~~and Section 9 of~~ the ~~Uniform Commercial~~most ~~Code,~~recent asunaudited ~~well as certain aspects of IKB’s claims for breach of~~net ~~contract,~~operating ~~breach~~income of ~~fiduciary duty, and violation of~~ the ~~TIA.~~significant ~~The~~obligor ~~court~~was ~~denied the remainder of the motion to dismiss. IKB’s remaining claims for breach of contract~~$27, ~~breach of fiduciary duty~~832, ~~breach of duty to avoid conflicts of interest, and violation of the TIA will proceed~~546.96 Onfor ~~May 10, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed a notice of appeal with~~ the ~~New York Supreme Court Appellate~~period ~~Division, First Department, regarding certain aspects~~ of ~~the~~January ~~court’s order on the motion to dismiss. On May 20~~1, 2021, ~~IKB filed a notice of cross appeal with respect~~ to ~~other~~September ~~aspects of that order. On June 2~~30, 2021~~, IKB filed a motion for re-argument regarding certain aspects of that order, which the court denied on August 3, 2021~~. On May 13, 2021, DBNTC and DBTCA filed an answer to the complaint. On October 28, 2021, the parties filed a stipulation, voluntarily dismissing with prejudice all claims as to seven additional trusts. Discovery is ongoing.

ItItem is7. ~~DBTCA’s~~Change ~~belief~~in ~~that~~Sponsor itInterest ~~has no pending legal proceedings (including, based on DBTCA’s present evaluation, the litigation disclosed~~ in ~~the~~ ~~foregoing paragraphs) that would materially affect its ability to perform its duties under~~ the ~~Pooling and Servicing Agreement for this transaction~~Securities.

~~Item~~None ~~6. Significant Obligors of Pool Assets.~~

~~The 100 Church Street mortgage loan constitutes a significant obligor within the meaning of~~ Item ~~1101(k)(2) of Regulation AB as disclosed in the Prospectus Supplement filed with the SEC on July 31, 2012~~10. ~~In accordance with Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB, the most recent unaudited net operating income of the significant obligor was $14,417,223~~Exhibits.98 ~~for the period of January 1, 2021 to June 30, 2021.~~

~~Item~~(a) 7.The ~~Change~~following inis ~~Sponsor~~a ~~Interest~~list inof ~~the~~documents ~~Securities.~~filed as part of this Report on Form 10-D:

~~None~~(99.1) Monthly report distributed to holders of the certificates issued by WFRBS Commercial Mortgage Trust 2012-C8, relating to the December 17, 2021 distribution.

~~Item~~(b) ~~10.~~The ~~Exhibits~~exhibits required to be filed by the Registrant pursuant to this Form are listed above.

~~(a) The following is a list of documents filed as part of this Report on Form 10-D:~~ SIGNATURES

~~(99.1)~~Pursuant ~~Monthly~~to ~~report~~the ~~distributed~~requirements ~~to holders~~ of the ~~certificates~~Securities ~~issued~~Exchange byAct ~~WFRBS~~of ~~Commercial~~1934, the ~~Mortgage~~registrant ~~Trust~~has ~~2012-C8,~~duly ~~relating~~caused this report to ~~the~~be ~~November~~signed on its behalf by the ~~18,~~undersigned ~~2021 distribution.~~thereunto duly authorized.

~~(b)~~Wells ~~The~~Fargo ~~exhibits~~Commercial ~~required~~Mortgage toSecurities, ~~be filed by the Registrant pursuant to this~~Inc. ~~Form~~(Depositor) ~~are listed above.~~

~~SIGNATURES~~/s/ Anthony Sfarra Anthony Sfarra, President

~~Pursuant~~Date: December ~~to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934~~28, ~~the registrant~~2021 ~~has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.~~

Wells Fargo Commercial Mortgage Securities, Inc. (Depositor)

/s/ Anthony Sfarra Anthony Sfarra, President

Date: December 1, 2021

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington D.C. 20549

FORM 10-D

ASSET BACKED ISSUER DISTRIBUTION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Registered/reporting pursuant to (check one)

Loss Information as reported on NovemberDecember 1817, 2021

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington D.C. 20549

ASSET BACKED ISSUER
DISTRIBUTION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Filing Compare · WFRBS COMMERCIAL MORTGAGE TRUST 2012-C8