UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DCD.C. 20549

_________________

FORM 10-Q

~~(Mark One)~~_________________

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2013
	or
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the ~~transition~~quarterly period ~~from~~ended toMarch 31, 2019

~~Commission File~~or ~~Number: 0-24635~~

~~HYPERTENSION~~[_] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION ~~DIAGNOSTICS,~~13 ~~INC.~~OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

~~(Exact name~~For ofthe ~~Registrant~~transition asperiod ~~Specified~~from ~~in its Charter)~~_________________

MINNESOTA		41‑1618036
(State or Other Jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
Incorporation or Organization)

Commission File Number: 000-24635

10501 WAYZATA BOULEVARD SOUTH, SUITE 102, MINNETONKA, MN	55305
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)
952-545-2457
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

_____________________

~~Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has~~Hypertension filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports)Diagnostics, ~~and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days~~Inc.

~~YES~~(Exact ~~x NOo~~ name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T ( § 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files)._____________________

YES o NOx

Minnesota		41-1618036
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

550 Highway 7 East, Unit 316		L4B 3Z4
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

~~Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non~~404-~~accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b~~449-~~2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):~~6151

~~Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company x~~ (DoRegistrant’s ~~not~~telephone ~~check~~number, ifincluding area ~~a smaller reporting company~~code)

~~Indicate~~Securities byregistered ~~check~~pursuant ~~mark~~to ~~whether the registrant is a shell~~Section ~~company~~ 12(asb) ~~defined in Rule 12b-2~~ of the ~~Exchange~~ Act). :

~~YES o NO~~Title x of each class Name of each exchange on which registered N/A N/A

AsIndicate ofby ~~May~~check ~~13,~~mark ~~2013,~~if ~~there~~the ~~were~~registrant is ~~issued~~not ~~and~~required ~~outstanding~~to ~~52,388,750 shares~~file ofreports ~~the~~pursuant ~~issuer’s~~to ~~common~~Section ~~stock~~13 ~~and~~or ~~611,390~~Section 15(d) ~~shares~~ of the ~~issuer’s Series A convertible preferred stock~~Act. Yes ☒ No ☐

~~HYPERTENSION~~Indicate ~~DIAGNOSTICS~~by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),~~INC~~ and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☐ No ☒

~~INDEX~~Indicate TOby ~~FORM~~check 10mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-QT (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☐ No ☒

		Page No
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION:
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	Consolidated Balance Sheets – March 31, 2013 (unaudited) and June 30, 2012	4
	Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited) – Three Months and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2013 and 2012	5
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) – Nine Months Ended March 31, 2013 and 2012	6
	Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	17
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	22
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	22
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION:
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	22
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	23
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and use of Proceeds	23
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	23
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	24
Item 5.	Other Information	24
Item 6.	Exhibits	25
	SIGNATURES	26
	CERTIFICATIONS	27

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

2Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☐ Non-accelerated filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☒ Emerging growth company ☐

~~HypertensionDiagnostics~~If an emerging growth company, ~~Inc~~indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

~~Forward~~Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-~~LookingStatements~~2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

~~This~~There ~~report~~were ~~may contain “forward-looking” statements~~136,813,921 asshares ~~such~~of ~~term is defined by~~ the ~~Securities and Exchange Commission~~registrant’s ~~rules, regulations and releases, which represent the~~common ~~current beliefs of our management as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to management~~stock, ~~including~~ ~~but~~$.001 ~~not~~par ~~limited~~value ~~to,~~per ~~statements concerning the operations~~share, ~~economic performance,~~outstanding ~~financial condition, growth and acquisition strategies, investments, and future operational plans of Hypertension Diagnostics, Inc. (referred to~~ as ~~“HDI,” the “Company,” “we,” or “us”). For this purpose, any statements contained herein that are not statements~~ of ~~historical~~July ~~fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing~~12, words such as “may,” “expect,” “believe,” “expect,” “can,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “could,” “might,” “plan,” “predict” or “continue” or the negative or other variations thereof or comparable terminology are intended to identify forward-looking statements2019. ~~We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements and to recognize that the statements are not predictions of actual future results.~~

~~These statements~~Part byI their nature involve substantial risks and uncertainties, certain of which are beyond the Company’s control, and actual results may differ materially depending on a variety of important factors, including our ability to generate acceptable levels of revenues; negative effect on our stock price resulting from available securities for sale; our need for additional capital; significant business risks associated with the relocation and re-~~start~~ ofFinancial the Company’s HDI Plastics, Inc. subsidiary business; the illiquidity of our securities on the OTC Bulletin Board and the related restrictions on our securities relating to “penny stocks”; uncertainty related to acquisitions; governmental regulation; commercial viability of required raw materials, and any other factors discussed in this and other filings of the Company with the Securities and Exchange commission. We undertake no responsibility to update any forward-looking statement. These forward‑looking statements are only made as of the date of this report. The following should be read in conjunction with the information presented in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012, as amended.Information

3Item 1. - Financial Statements

~~HypertensionDiagnostics~~Hypertension Diagnostics, Inc.

~~Consolidated~~Balance ~~BalanceSheets~~Sheets

March31, 2013

	March 31, 2019			December 31, 2018
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	86,392		$	86,392
Accounts receivable, net		187,595			187,595
Inventory, net		189,434			189,434
Prepaids and other current assets		41,950			41,950
Note receivable - related party		196,181			196,081
Accrued royalty’s receivable from CPC		4,252			4,252
Total Current Assets		705,704			705,704

Property and Equipment
Leasehold improvements		93,235			93,235
Furniture and equipment		19,907			19,907
Computer & electronic equipment		672,383			672,383
Total property and equipment		785,525			785,525
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(275,998	)		(275,998	)
Property and equipment, net		509,527			509,527
Other assets		62,598			62,598
Total Assets	$	1,277,829		$	1,277,829

Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	445,644		$	445,644
Accrued vacation, payroll and payroll taxes		37,700			37,700
Other accrued expenses		860,792			860,792
Current Liabilities		1,344,136			1,344,136
Long Term Liabilities:
Notes payable - subordinated debt, net		4,685,469			4,685,469
Total Long-term liabilities		4,685,469			4,685,469
Total Liabilities		6,029,605			6,029,605

Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, $.01 par value:
Authorized Shares - 5,000,000, Issued and outstanding shares - 611,390		6,144			6,144
Common stock, $.01 par value:
Authorized shares - 150,000,000, Issued and outstanding shares 52,388,750 issued		523,887			523,887
Additional paid-in capital		28,462,631			28,462,631
Accumulated deficit		(33,744,438	)		(33,744,438	)
Total Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)		(4,751,776	)		(4,751,776	)
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	1,277,829		$	1,277,829

~~PART~~The ~~I. FINANCIAL~~accompanying ~~INFORMATION~~notes are an integral part of these financial statements

~~Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements~~2

Consolidated Balance Sheets
	March 31, 2013 (Unaudited)	June 30, 2012
Assets
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 5,664	$ 75,043
Accounts receivable, net	42,066	149,156
Prepaids and other current assets	13,530	31,304
Inventory, net	140,486	172,223
Note receivable-related party-CPC	75,000	146,319
Accrued royalties receivable from CPC	-	2,400
Total Current Assets	276,746	576,445
Property and equipment, net	731,915	678,331
Debt issuance costs, net	6,150	7,380
Other assets	50,128	43,657
Total Assets	$ 1,064,939	$ 1,305,813
Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity (Deficit)
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$ 437,690	$ 170,832
Sale-leaseback obligation-current portion	40,481	35,383
Accrued vacation, payroll and payroll taxes	102,367	29,236
Payable for equipment	155,000	155,000
Other accrued expenses	215,080	246,240
Notes payable-senior debt, net of discounts	159,677	-
Note Payable-Asher convertible debt, net of discounts	24,070	-
Current liabilities of discontinued operations	-	18,143
Total Current Liabilities	1,134,365	654,834
Long Term Liabilities:
Notes payable-subordinated debt, net of discounts	903,184	610,615
Note Payable-Taylor Economic Development	140,000	-
Sale-leaseback obligation	35,502	66,533
Deferred compensation-discontinued operations	280,643	262,500
Total Long-Term Liabilities	1,359,329	939,648
Total Liabilities	2,493,694	1,594,482
Shareholders' Equity (Deficit)
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, $.01 par value: Authorized shares--5,000,000 Issued and outstanding shares—611,390 at March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012. Each share of preferred stock is convertible into 12 shares of common stock at the option of the holder. (Aggregate liquidation preference of $11,642,276 and $10,145,478 at March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively.)	6,114	6,114
Common Stock, $.01 par value: Authorized shares--150,000,000 Issued and outstanding shares—52,388,750 at March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012.	523,887	523,887
Additional paid-in capital	28,723,460	28,462,631
Accumulated deficit	(30,682,216)	(29,281,301)
Total Shareholders' Equity (Deficit)	(1,428,755)	(288,669)
Total Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity (Deficit)	$ 1,064,939	$ 1,305,813

Hypertension Diagnostics, Inc.
Statements of Operations

See accompanying notes.

	For the three months ended March 31, 2019		For the year ended December 31, 2018
Revenue:
Sales	$	–	$	3,659,168
Rental / brokered		–		100,200
Service/contract income/royalties		–		32,738
Total Revenue		–		3,792,106

Cost of Sales:
Cost of sales		–		2,837,632
Inventory obsolescence reserve		–		–
Net Cost of Sales		–		2,837,632
Gross Profit		–		954,474

Expenses
Selling, general & administrative		–		917,768
Interest Expenses		–		161,678
Depreciation		–		36,000
Total Expenses		–		1,115,446
Operating Loss		–		(160,972	)

Other Income:
Interest Income		–		27,327
Other Income		–		8,255
Rounding		–		2
Total Other Income		–		34,884
Net income (loss) before income taxes		–		(125,388	)
Income Tax		–		–

Net Loss	$	–	$	(125,388	)

4The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

~~HypertensionDiagnostics, Inc.~~3

~~ConsolidatedStatements~~Hypertension ofDiagnostics, ~~Operations~~Inc.

~~March31,~~Statements ~~2013~~of ~~and~~Shareholders’ ~~2012~~Equity (Deficit)

Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
											Additional
	Three months ended			Nine months ended
	Preferred						Common Stock				Paid-in		Accumulated
	March 31, 2013		March 31, 2012	March 31, 2013		March 31, 2012
	Shares			Amount			Shares		Amount		Capital		Deficit			Total
Net Revenues:
Balance at DECEMBER 31, 2017		611,390		$	6,114			52,388,750	$	523,887	$	28,462,631	$	(33,619,050	)	$	(4,626,388	)
Plastics	$ 821		$ 1,837,289	$ 43,480		$ 3,022,981
Net Loss														(125,388	)		(125,388	)
Royalties	-		3,240	5,400		16,320
Balance at DECEMBER 31, 2018		611,390		$	6,114			52,388,750	$	523,887	$	28,462,631		(33,744,438	)	$	(4,751,776	)
Total revenues	821		1,840,529	48,880		3,039,301
Net Loss														–			–
Cost of Sales-Plastics	184,530		1,624,477	588,911		2,859,479
Balance at MARCH 31, 2019		611,390		$	6,114			52,388,750	$	523,887	$	28,462,631	$	(33,744,438	)	$	(4,751,776	)
Gross Profit (Loss)	(183,709)		216,052	(540,031)		179,822
Expenses:
Selling, general and administrative	188,237		566,892	507,220		1,021,553
(Gain) loss on disposition of assets	-		-	79,973		-
Total Expenses	188,237		566,892	587,193		1,021,553
Operating loss	(371,946)		(350,840)	(1,127,224)		(841,731)
Other Income and (Expense):
Interest income	-		10,057	3,681		18,913
Miscellaneous income	-		6,500	-		6,999
Interest expense	(106,951)		(69,197)	(245,548)		(88,244)
Total Other Income and (Expense)	(106,951)		(52,640)	(241,867)		(62,332)
Net loss before income taxes	(478,897)		(403,480)	(1,369,091)		(904,063)
Income taxes	-		-	-		-
Net loss from continuing operations	(478,897)		(403,480)	(1,369,091)		(904,063)
Income (Loss) from discontinued operations	(149,681)		409,085	(31,824)		(192,279)
Loss on sale of discontinued operations	-		-	-		(123,702)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations	(149,681)		409,085	(31,824)		(315,981)
Net income (loss)	$ (628,578)		$ 5,605	$ (1,400,915)		$ (1,220,044)
Earnings Per Share:
Basic income (loss) from continuing operations per share	$ (0.01)		$ (0.01)	$ (0.03)		$ (0.02)
Diluted income (loss) from continuing operations per share	$ (0.01)		$ (0.01)	$ (0.03)		$ (0.02)
Net Income (loss) from discontinued operations:
Basic income (loss) from discontinued operations per share	$ 0.00		$ 0.01	$ 0.00		$ (0.01)
Diluted income (loss) from discontinued operations per share	$ 0.00		$ 0.01	$ 0.00		$ (0.01)
Net Income (loss) per Common Share:
Basic income (loss) per common share	$ (0.01)		$ 0.00	$ (0.03)		$ (0.03)
Diluted income (loss) per common share	$ (0.01)		$ 0.00	$ (0.03)		$ (0.03)
Weighted Average Common Shares Outstanding:
Basic	52,388,750		48,305,462	52,388,750		44,973,644
Diluted	52,388,750		55,642,142	52,388,750		44,973,644

~~See~~The accompanying notes. are an integral part of these financial statements

~~HypertensionDiagnostics,~~Hypertension Diagnostics, Inc. Statements of Cash Flows

ConsolidatedStatements of Cash Flows

	For the three months ended March 31, 2019		For the year ended December 31, 2018
Operating Activities:
Net Loss	$	–	$	(125,388	)
Adjustment to reconcile net loss to net
Cash used in operating activities:
Deferred stock-based compensation (income) expenses
Depreciation		–		36,000
Rounding		–		(1	)
Allowance for Receivables		–		361
Inventory obsolescence reserve		–		1,580
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		–		(17,092	)
Inventory		–		(4,520	)
Prepaid and other current assets		–		(1,998	)
Accounts Payable		–		23,504
Accrued vacation, payroll and payroll taxes		–		1,795
Notes, Loans and Lines of Credit		–		65,391
Rounding		–		1
Other accrued expenses		–		(368,911	)
Net cash used in operating activities		–		(389,278	)

Investing Activities
Issuance of note receivable-related party
Property, Plant, Equipment and other Assets		–		(2,111	)
Net cash used in investing activities		–		(2,111	)

Financing Activities
Proceeds from exercise of warrants
Proceeds from subordinate debt		–		81,066
Proceeds from Other Debt and Loans		–		108,281
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		–		–
Net cash provided by financing activities		–		189,347

Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		–		(202,042	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		83,392		285,434
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	83,392	$	83,392

~~March31,~~The ~~2013~~accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
	Nine months ended March 31,
	2013	2012
Operating Activities:
Net loss	$ (1,400,915)	$ (1,220,044)
Adjustments to reconcile loss to net
Cash used in operating activities:
Loss from discontinued operations	31,824	192,279
Loss on sale of discontinued operations	-	123,702
Net loss from continuing operations	(1,369,091)	(904,063)
Adjustments to reconcile net income(loss) to net cash used in operating activities
Loss on disposition of property and equipment	79,973	-
Depreciation	116,659	67,560
Stock compensation expense	-	302,822
Amortization of debt issuance costs	1,230	-
Amortization of debt discount and accreted interest	107,145	14,705
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Accreted interest on note receivable	(3,681)	(13,467)
Accounts receivable	107,090	(1,089,778)
Inventory	31,737	(142,534)
Prepaids and other current assets	17,774	(18,847)
Other assets	(6,471)	(37,127)
Accrued royalties receivable	2,400	(3,600)
Accounts payable	266,858	202,053
Accrued vacation, payroll and payroll taxes	73,131	120,366
Deferred rent	-	92,749
Other accrued expenses	(31,160)	60,614
Net cash used in operating activities	(606,406)	(1,348,547)
Investing Activities:
Payment received on notes receivable	75,000	-
Purchases of property and equipment	(250,216)	(630,525)
Payment received on note receivable-related party-Minot	-	125,000
Net cash used in investing activities	(175,216)	(505,525)
Financing Activities:
Proceeds from Charter Capital-line of credit	-	630,184
Proceeds (payments) on sale-leaseback obligation	(25,933)	109,813
Proceeds from Note Payable-Taylor Economic Development	140,000	-
Proceeds from Note Payable-Asher, net of issuance cost of $5,000	70,000	-
Proceeds from issuance of senior notes	200,000	-
Proceeds from issuance of subordinated notes	360,000	833,600
Net cash provided by financing activities	744,067	1,573,597
Net cash used in continuing operations	(37,555)	(280,475)
Discontinued Operations:
Net cash used in operating activities of discontinued operations	(31,824)	(91,311)
Net increase(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	(69,379)	(371,786)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	75,043	753,821
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$ 5,664	$ 382,035
Supplemental non-cash flow information:
Payable for equipment	$ -	$ 155,000
Note receivable-related party from sale of discontinued operations	$ -	$ 127,500
Increase in debt discounts on subordinated notes by issuing stock warrants	$ 206,519	$ 252,393
Increase in debt discounts on Asher note due to beneficial conversion feature	$ 54,310

~~See~~Hypertension ~~accompanying~~Diagnostics, ~~notes~~Inc.

6Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

~~HypertensionDiagnostics~~Quarterly Period ended March 31, ~~Inc.~~2018

~~Notes~~Note to1. ~~theConsolidated~~Organization ~~Financial~~and ~~Statements~~Significant Accounting Policies

~~March31,~~Description ~~2013~~of Business

~~Note~~We 1were incorporated under the laws of the State of Minnesota on July 19, 1988. ~~Basis~~ We were previously engaged in the medical device business. In mid-2011, HDI’s board of ~~Presentation~~directors determined to pursue a change in strategic direction. In August 2011, we sold our medical device inventory, subleased our office and manufacturing facility, and entered into a limited license agreement with a company owned by Jay Cohn, a founder and a director of the Company. In September 2011, we formed HDI Plastics Inc. (“HDIP”), a wholly owned-subsidiary, entered into a new lease agreement, purchased selected manufacturing assets from Compass Bank and Cycled Plastics and began engaging in the business of plastics reprocessing in Austin, TX. Demand for reprocessed plastic is growing, and HDIP has the systems and infrastructure for collecting and processing post-consumer and post-industrial plastic waste into pellets to be resold to domestic manufacturing companies.

~~The~~Use ~~accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements~~ of Hypertension Diagnostics, Inc. (the “Company” or “HDI”) have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all the information and notes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, these unaudited financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the financial statements. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year ending June 30, 2013. For further information, refer to the financial statements and notes included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012, as amended. The policies described in that report are used for preparing quarterly reports.Estimates

OnThe ~~July~~preparation ~~14,~~of ~~2011,~~financial ~~the Company formed~~statements ~~HDI~~in ~~Plastics,~~conformity ~~Inc.~~with ~~(“HDIP”~~accounting orprinciples ~~“Plastics”),~~generally asaccepted ain ~~wholly-owned subsidiary of~~ the ~~Company.~~ ~~HDIP~~United ~~commenced~~States ~~operations~~requires inmanagement ~~October~~to ~~2011. HDIP~~make isestimates ~~the~~and ~~principal~~assumptions ~~operating~~that ~~business~~affect of the ~~Company. HDIP~~amounts isreported ~~engaged~~ in the ~~processing~~financial ~~of recycled~~statements ~~plastic~~and ~~material~~accompanying ~~including~~notes. ~~re-processing~~Actual ~~into~~results ~~pellet-form~~could ~~for~~differ ~~sale~~from ~~to manufacturing~~those ~~customers~~estimates.

~~Note~~Principles 2.of ~~Going Concern~~Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements ~~have~~include ~~been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in~~ the ~~United~~accounts ~~States~~ of ~~America, assuming~~ the Company ~~will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets~~ and ~~satisfaction of~~its liabilities in the normal course of business. For the nine months ended March 31, 2013, we incurred losses from continuing operations of $1,369,091. At March 31, 2013, we had an accumulated deficit of $30,682,216 and negative working capital of $857,619. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our ability to raise the required additional capital or debt financing to meet shortwholly-~~term~~owned ~~needs~~subsidiary to(HDI ~~repay certain liabilities incurred to restart HDIP’s facility~~Plastics, ~~hire production workers, and ramp up to full operating capacity for our revenue generating activities~~Inc. ~~On February 4, 2013, HDIP borrowed $200,000 pursuant to a Secured Promissory Note (the “Note”~~) ~~in a principal amount of $200~~,~~000~~ inafter ~~favor~~elimination of ~~Mark~~all ~~Schwartz and~~intercompany ~~Alan Stern~~accounts, ~~directors of the Company. Under the terms of the Note~~transactions, ~~HDIP may borrow an additional $300,000 on the same terms~~ and ~~conditions as those set forth in the Note~~profits. ~~See Note 12 to these financial statements for more information.~~

IfCash we raise additional funds through the issuance of equity or convertible debt securities, the percentage ownership of our current shareholders could be reduced, and such securities might have rights, preferences or privileges senior to our common stock. Additional financing may not be available upon acceptable terms, or at all. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, we may not be able to adequately restart our plastics business, which could significantly and materially restrict our operations. Equivalents

~~Note~~The ~~3. Summary~~Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of ~~Significant~~three ~~Accounting~~months ~~Policies~~or less at the time of purchase to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains cash in financial institutions. The balances, at times, may exceed federally insured limits.

~~Discontinued~~Accounts Operations- On August 26, 2011 (the “Effective Date”), the Company entered into and closed a definitive Asset Purchase Agreement (the “August 26, 2011 Agreement”) providing for the sale of selected assets from our Hypertension Diagnostics Business to Cohn Prevention Center, LLC (“CPC”), a Minnesota company, controlled by Jay Cohn, a director and stockholder of HDI as of the Effective Date. See additional terms of this agreement in Note 4. As a result of the sale of selected assets of our medical device business, we have reclassified our previously reported financial results to exclude those operations affected by the sale. These results are presented on a historical basis as a separate line in our statements of operations and balance sheets entitled “Discontinued Operations.” HDI had previously retained rights to its intellectual property including the rights to royalty payments from CPC. Ongoing royalty income derived from the Company’s intellectual property is reflected as continuing operations. All of the information in the financial statements and notes to the financial statements have been revised to reflect only the results of our continuing operations from our new recycled plastics process business. On January 25, 2013, the Company entered into and closed a second definitive Asset Purchase Agreement (the “January 25, 2013 Agreement”) with CVC-HD, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“CVC”), controlled by Jay Cohn, effectively amending the August 26, 2011 Agreement and assigning to CVC the remaining assets related to the medical device business including intellectual property assets for an additional purchase price of $75,000. Additionally, at the time of this second agreement, HDI was still owed $200,000 from the first sale. In total, $275,000 is owed on these two sales and as of March 31, 2013, $75,000 has been received. The balance of the $200,000 is to be paid off in monthly installments with final payment due June 30, 2013. The royalty provisions of the August 26, 2011 Agreement were eliminated in this January 25, 2013 Agreement. Receivable

7The Company reviews customers’ credit history before extending unsecured credit. Accounts receivable are reviewed to determine the need for an allowance for amounts that may become uncollectible in the future. The necessity of an allowance is based on management’s review of accounts receivable balances and historic write-offs. Invoice terms can vary from at date of shipment to net 30 days. The Company does not accrue interest on past due accounts receivable. The Company writes off receivables when they are deemed uncollectible after all collection attempts have failed. The Company has determined that an allowance for doubtful accounts is not necessary as of March 31, 2019.

~~HypertensionDiagnostics, Inc.~~Inventory

~~Notes~~Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market with cost based upon the average cost of raw material purchased which includes an allocation of manufacturing overhead if further processing has been done. Typically, the Company holds material for less than 45 days. The nature of the Company’s inventory does not result in obsolescence of either processed or unprocessed material. Inventory on hand at the end of the period is reviewed to ~~theConsolidated~~determine ~~Financial~~the ~~Statements~~need for a reserve for or write-off and dispose of any material which is not useable. The need for a reserve is based on management’s review of inventories on hand compared to estimated future usage and sales. As of March 31, 2019, there was no reserve for obsolete inventory.

~~March31, 2013~~6

~~Principles~~Property ~~of Consolidation~~and Equipment

~~The~~Property ~~accompanying~~and ~~consolidated financial~~equipment ~~statements~~are ~~include~~stated ~~the~~at ~~accounts~~cost. Improvements ofare ~~the~~capitalized, ~~Company~~while repair and ~~its~~maintenance ~~wholly-owned~~costs are charged to operations when incurred. Depreciation is ~~subsidiary~~computed ~~(HDI~~principally ~~Plastics,~~using ~~Inc~~the straight-line method.), Estimated ~~after~~useful ~~elimination~~lives offor ~~all~~leasehold ~~intercompany~~improvements are the shorter of ~~accounts,~~the ~~transactions~~lease term or estimated useful life and 3 to 5 years for furniture and processing equipment, and ~~profits~~computer equipment.

~~Recent~~Fair ~~Accounting Pronouncements~~Value of Financial Instruments

InThe ~~July 2012,~~Company’s ~~the~~financial ~~FASB issued~~instruments ~~ASU~~are ~~No. 2012-02,~~recorded ~~Testing~~on ~~Indefinite-Lived~~its ~~Intangible~~balance ~~Assets for Impairment~~sheet. ~~Under~~ ~~this~~The ~~standard,~~carrying ~~entities~~amounts ~~testing long-lived intangible assets~~ for ~~impairment~~ ~~now~~cash, ~~have~~accounts anreceivable, ~~option~~note ~~of performing a qualitative assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. If an entity determines~~receivable, onaccounts ~~the basis of qualitative factors~~payable, ~~that~~and ~~the~~accrued expenses approximate fair value ofdue to the ~~indefinite-lived~~ ~~intangible~~immediate ~~asset~~or ~~is more~~short-~~likely-than-not~~term ~~less~~maturity ~~than~~of ~~the carrying~~these ~~amount,~~financial ~~the~~instruments. ~~existing~~The ~~quantitative~~lease ~~impairment test is required.~~obligation ~~Otherwise,~~and nosubordinated ~~further~~debt ~~impairment~~approximates ~~testing~~fair isvalue ~~required.~~since ~~For HDI,~~ this ~~ASU~~debt was ~~effective~~ ~~beginning~~recently ~~January 1, 2013~~obtained. ~~The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.~~

~~Note~~Impairment ~~4. Discontinued~~of ~~Operations~~Long-Lived Assets

OnThe ~~August 26, 2011, (the “Effective Date”), the~~ Company ~~entered~~will ~~into~~record ~~and~~impairment ~~closed a definitive Asset Purchase~~losses ~~Agreement~~on ~~(the~~long-lived ~~“August~~assets ~~26,~~used ~~2011~~in ~~Agreement”)~~operations ~~providing~~when ~~for~~indicators ~~the sale~~ of ~~selected assets~~impairment ~~of our~~are ~~medical~~present ~~device business to Cohn Prevention Center, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (“CPC”), controlled by Jay Cohn, a director~~ and ~~stockholder of HDI as of~~ the ~~Effective~~undiscounted ~~Date.~~future ~~The~~cash ~~terms~~flows ~~of the Agreement~~estimated ~~provided~~to ~~for~~be ~~the~~generated ~~sale~~by ofthose ~~selected~~assets ~~operating~~are ~~assets~~less ofthan the ~~Company~~assets’s ~~medical device~~carrying ~~business (including inventory but excluding cash, accounts receivable, and intellectual property)~~amount. ~~The~~ ~~Agreement~~To ~~does not limit the ability of CPC to sell the purchased inventory to any customer or in any market where they can be legally sold. Additionally~~date, ~~CPC~~no ~~assumed~~such ~~all~~losses ~~warranty~~have ~~and~~been ~~on-going product support required by regulatory agencies related to such inventory~~recognized.

InRevenue connection with the Agreement, CPC paid the Company on the Effective Date a cash payment of $125,000 and issued a secured promissory note (non-interest bearing) to the Company in the amount of either $150,000 due in 12 months or $200,000 due in 18 months at the discretion of CPC (See Note 6). We received a letter on July 27, 2012 from CPC indicating the intent to pay $200,000 on February 26, 2013. Nearly all of the proceeds received on the Effective Date were allocated to cover severance and other costs related to the transactions contemplated by the Agreement. Severance costs included an agreement by the Company to pay to Greg Guettler, its former Chief Operating Officer, nine months’ salary and health benefits. The Company paid Mr. Guettler $119,463 to fulfill the agreement on March 1, 2012. Pursuant to the Agreement, CPC agreed to pay to the Company a cash payment of $1,200 upon the sale of each of the first 50 units of inventory sold by CPC within 30 days of receipt of cash from such sale. The Company has agreed to pay Mr. Guettler 10% of the royalty proceeds received by the Company less applicable transaction expenses related to such sales. The Company has earned royalty income of $0 and $6,000 less 10% due to Greg Guettler for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2013, respectively. Recognition

~~The~~Plastics ~~Company~~- ~~and~~Beginning ~~CPC~~October ~~also~~2011, ~~entered~~HDI ~~into~~Plastics abegan ~~Sublicense~~selling ~~Agreement~~finished ongoods ~~the~~to ~~Effective~~manufacturers ~~Date~~in (the ~~“Sublicense~~form ~~Agreement”),~~of pelletized resin and clean shredded and ground plastics ~~pursuant~~material. toThese ~~which~~sales are recorded as revenue at the ~~Company~~time ~~granted~~the toproduct ~~CPC~~is ashipped ~~limited~~and ~~license~~invoiced to ~~use~~ the customer. The Company’s also ~~intellectual~~engages ~~property,~~in ~~technology,~~“toll” ~~and~~processing ~~technical~~of ~~know~~customer-~~how~~owned ~~related~~material ~~to the~~for ~~Company’s~~a ~~arterial~~service ~~elasticity~~fee. ~~measurement~~These ~~technology~~service ~~exclusively~~fees inare ~~CPC~~recorded ~~clinics~~as ~~and~~plastic ~~research~~processing ~~related~~revenue ~~exclusively~~at the time the product is shipped back to ~~CPC~~the ~~clinics~~customer. ~~All~~ In ~~other applications~~addition, of the Company’s engages ~~intellectual~~in ~~property,~~brokerage ~~technology~~transactions ~~and~~of ~~technical know-how~~plastic ~~will~~material bewhere ~~retained~~goods byare ~~the~~delivered ~~Company~~to ~~for~~a ~~the~~customer ~~benefit~~without HDIP taking physical possession of the ~~Company. The Sublicense~~product ~~Agreement~~at ~~also~~its ~~provides~~processing ~~that~~facility, ~~any~~although ~~development~~HDIP assumes ownership of athe ~~next~~material. ~~generation~~The net profit from ~~arterial~~“brokerage” ~~measurement~~transactions ~~device,~~is ~~however,~~recorded ~~would~~as berevenue ~~limited~~at ~~exclusively~~the time it is shipped to ~~use~~the customer and ~~sale~~ ~~within~~invoiced. ~~the~~Brokered sales ~~CPC~~are ~~network~~recorded ofas ~~clinics~~revenue ~~and~~net toof ~~research~~the ~~exclusively~~cost ~~related~~of ~~to CPC~~the ~~clinics~~brokered material.

~~CPC~~Royalties ~~and~~– After the ~~Company~~sale ~~also entered into a Sublease Agreement as~~ of the ~~Effective Date, which permits CPC to lease~~ ~~the~~medical ~~Waters~~device IIbusiness ~~Suite~~in ~~108,~~August ~~Eagan~~2011, ~~Minnesota facility of~~ the Company ~~during~~is ~~the remaining~~receiving ~~term~~a ofminor ~~the~~amount ~~Company’s~~of ~~lease,~~royalty ~~which~~income ~~expires~~in ~~October~~connection ~~31,~~with ~~2014, on~~ the license ~~same~~agreement. ~~pass-through~~This ~~economic~~income ~~terms~~is being recorded as ~~the~~revenue ~~underlying~~when ~~lease~~a ~~with~~sale ~~HDI~~is ~~which~~made ~~remains as~~by anCPC ~~obligation~~to ofa ~~the~~3rd ~~Company~~party purchaser.

~~The~~Shipping ~~Company~~and ~~recorded~~Handling ~~a loss on the sale transaction in the amount of $123,702 in the quarter ended September 30, 2011.~~Costs

8The Company records all amounts billed to customers in a sales transaction related to shipping and handling as sales. The Company records costs related to shipping and handling in cost of sales.

~~HypertensionDiagnostics,~~Income ~~Inc.~~Taxes

~~Notes~~The Company accounts for income taxes by following an asset and liability approach to ~~theConsolidated~~financial ~~Financial~~accounting ~~Statements~~and reporting for income taxes. Accordingly, deferred tax assets and liabilities arise from the difference between the tax basis of an asset or liability and its reported amount in the financial statements. Deferred tax amounts are determined using the tax rates expected to be in effect when the taxes will actually be paid or refunds received, as provided under currently enacted tax law. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. Income tax expense or benefit is the tax payable or refundable, respectively, for the period plus or minus the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities during the period. In accordance with the guidance, the Company has adopted a policy under which, if required to be recognized in the future, interest related to the underpayment of income taxes will be classified as a component of interest expense and any related penalties will be classified in operating expenses in the consolidated statement of operations.

~~March31, 2013~~7

OnThe ~~January 25, 2013, (the “Effective Date”), the~~ Company ~~entered~~recognizes ~~into and closed~~ a ~~second~~financial ~~definitive~~statement ~~Asset~~benefit ~~Purchase~~of ~~Agreement~~a ~~(the~~tax ~~“Agreement”)~~position ~~modifying~~only ~~the~~after ~~August~~determining ~~26,~~that ~~2011 Agreement, by selling~~ the ~~remaining~~relevant ~~medical~~tax ~~device~~authority ~~business~~would ~~assets to CVC~~more-~~HD, LLC,~~likely-than-not asustain ~~Minnesota limited liability company (“CVC”), controlled by Jay Cohn, for $75,000. This amount is in addition to~~ the ~~$200,000 owed to the Company by CPC~~position asfollowing ~~set~~an ~~forth above, which payment terms were modified as set forth below~~audit. ~~The Company~~ ~~has~~For ~~not~~tax ~~recorded~~positions ~~the~~meeting ~~revenue from this additional sale due to~~ the ~~collectability~~ is more-likely-than-not ~~reasonably assured at this time~~threshold, ~~since~~ the ~~original $150,000~~amount ~~note~~recognized ~~from the first sale has not been paid following its original terms. The aggregate $275,000 consists of a cash payment~~ in the ~~amount~~consolidated offinancial ~~$37,500~~statements ~~due~~is on the ~~Effective~~largest ~~Date~~benefit ~~which~~that ~~was~~has ~~received, and~~ a ~~promissory~~greater ~~note~~than ~~in the~~fifty ~~amount~~percent oflikelihood ~~$237,500 payable in installments with the first payment~~ of ~~$37,500~~ ~~due~~being ~~February~~realized ~~2013~~upon ~~and~~ultimate ~~$50,000~~settlement ~~due each subsequent month~~ with the ~~final payment~~relevant ~~due~~tax ~~in June 2013~~authority. ~~As of March 31, 2013, a total of $75,000 has been received on this note.~~

~~The~~Net ~~Company~~Income ~~has not included the results of operations of our former medical device business in the results from continuing operations. The income~~ (~~loss~~Loss) ~~from~~Per ~~discontinued operations for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2013, and 2012 consists of the following:~~Share

Income from Discontinued Operations	Three months ended March 31,		Nine months ended March 31,
	2013	2012	2013	2012
Revenue, net	$ -	$ -	$ -	$ 248,923
Cost of Goods Sold	-	-	-	10,557
Gross Profit	-	-	-	238,366
Operating expenses (miscellaneous)	13,687	(15,335)	31,824	265,645
Deferred compensation expense (benefit)	135,994	(393,750)	-	165,000
Income (loss) from discontinued operations	(149,681)	409,085	(31,824)	(192,279)
Gain (loss) on sale of selected assets to CPC	-	-	-	(123,702)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations	$ (149,681)	$ 409,085	$ (31,824)	$ (315,981)

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period. Diluted net income (loss) per share includes the dilutive effect of common shares potentially issuable upon the exercise of stock options, warrants, or the conversion of preferred stock.

~~The~~Stock-Based Company does not have any existing assets of discontinued operations at March 31, 2013. The only remaining liabilities of discontinued operations as of March 31, 2013 pertain to the deferred compensation of the former CEO. (See Note 9)Compensation

~~Note~~The 5Company regularly grants options to individuals under various plans. ~~Inventory~~The Company measures and recognizes compensation expense for all stock-based payment awards made to employees and directors on a straight-line basis over the respective vesting period of the awards. The compensation expense for the Company's stock-based payments is based on estimated fair values determined at the time of the grant of the portion of stock-based payment awards that are ultimately expected to vest.

~~Inventory~~The ~~consisted~~Company estimates the fair value of stock-based payment awards on the ~~following:~~date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. This option pricing model involves a number of assumptions, including the expected term of the stock options, the volatility of the public market price for the Company's common stock and interest rates.

	March 31,	June 30,
	2013	2012
Raw materials	$ 128,375	$ 96,142
Finished goods	12,111	76,081
Total inventory	$ 140,486	$ 172,223

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

~~Note~~Comprehensive 6income (loss) includes net income (loss) and items defined as other comprehensive income (loss). ~~Notes~~ ~~Receivable~~Items –defined ~~Related~~as ~~Parties~~other comprehensive income (loss) include items such as foreign currency translation adjustments and unrealized gains and losses on certain marketable securities. For the three month period ended March 31, 2018, there were no adjustments to net income (loss) to arrive at comprehensive income (loss).

InRecent ~~connection~~Accounting with the Asset Purchase Agreement between HDI and CPC on August 26, 2011, CPC paid HDI on the Effective Date a cash payment of $125,000 and issued a non-interest bearing secured promissory note due to HDI in the amount of either $150,000 due in 12 months or $200,000 due in 18 months, at the discretion of CPC. The promissory note was reflected at an imputed discount rate of 15% based upon the amount due 12 months following the Effective Date, and was originally recorded as a net note receivable of $127,500. The Company received a letter from CPC on July 27, 2012 indicating CPC’s intent to pay the $200,000 due February 26, 2013 instead of the original $150,000. The Company has elected to not recognize the additional income forthcoming on this Note until the cash is collected in the future. Pronouncements

OnThere ~~January~~were ~~25,~~no ~~2013,~~new ~~the~~accounting ~~Company sold~~standards the remaining intellectual property for an additional $75,000 (See Note 4). The Company received $37,500 in cash on January 25, 2013 which was applied to the original note, and a promissory note in the amount of $237,500 that replaces the existing note issued ~~by CPC listed above. The Company has not~~ ~~recorded~~or ~~the~~effective ~~revenue~~during ~~from this additional sale due to~~ the ~~collectability~~quarterly isperiod ~~not reasonably~~ended assured at this time, since the original $150,000 note from the first sale has not been paid following its original terms. The new note is payable in installments with the first payment due February 2013 for $37,500, which was received in March ~~2013~~31, ~~and~~2018 ~~$50,000~~that ~~due per month beginning in March 2013~~had, ~~which~~or ~~was~~are ~~not~~expected ~~received,~~to ~~with~~have ~~the~~a ~~final~~material ~~payment~~impact ~~due June 2013. As of March 31, 2013 $75,000 has been received~~ on the ~~note. A subsequent~~Company’s ~~payment~~results of ~~$25~~operations,~~000~~ onfinancial ~~the~~condition ~~note~~or ~~was~~cash ~~received in April 2013~~flows.

9Note 2. Going Concern

~~HypertensionDiagnostics~~The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, ~~Inc~~assuming the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our ability to raise the required additional capital or debt financing to meet short-term needs to relocate our plastics processing facility to a new site and then restart the facility which would include hiring production works.

~~Notes~~Note ~~to theConsolidated Financial Statements~~3. Inventory

~~March31,~~Raw ~~2013~~materials consist of the plastics that arrive at the processing facility that are sorted and staged in the warehouse as bales or in bins. The value of raw material is based on weight and volume and the average cost of purchasing. Finished goods are processed into pellet or regrind form and stored in gaylords. The inventory value of finished goods is based on weight and the cost to convert using a standard labor and overhead rate.

~~Note 7~~4. ~~Property~~ Subsequent ~~and Equipment~~Events

~~Property and Equipment is as follows:~~None.

	March 31,	June 30,
	2013	2012
Equipment	$ 707,413	$ 672,383
Leasehold improvements	213,103	93,235
Office furniture and equipment	9,006	7,923
Vehicles	11,984	11,984
Less accumulated depreciation	(209,591)	(107,194)
Total equipment	$ 731,915	$ 678,331

Depreciation expense was $44,670 and $37,603 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. For the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, depreciation expense was $116,659 and $67,560, respectively.SIGNATURES

~~The~~Pursuant ~~Company~~to ~~recognized~~the arequirements ~~net loss~~ of ~~$79,973~~Section ~~from~~13 ~~the~~or ~~sale~~15(d) of ~~equipment in~~ the ~~nine~~Securities Exchange ~~month~~Act ~~period~~of ~~ended March 31~~1934, ~~2013~~ ~~related to~~ the ~~abandonment~~registrant ofhas ~~leasehold~~duly ~~improvements~~caused ~~associated~~this ~~with~~report ~~the property~~to atbe ~~5330~~signed ~~Fleming~~on ~~Court,~~its ~~Austin,~~behalf TXby ~~due to~~ the ~~termination~~undersigned, ofthereunto ~~the lease~~duly ~~and surrender of the property~~authorized.

Note 8. Litigation

	Hypertension Diagnostics Inc.

Date: September 18, 2019	By: /s/ Liangjian Peng
	Liangjian Peng Chief Executive Officer

~~The Company is involved in various legal actions in the ordinary course of its business.~~ 9

~~On March 28, 2012, HDIP received a Notice of Violation related to its former processing facility located at 5330 Fleming Court, Austin, Texas, from the City of Austin Code Compliance Department.~~ The ~~Notice of Violation alleges violations of Austin~~Issuer’s ~~City~~ Code and failures to obtain required permits and a Certificate of Occupancy based upon the current use of the processing facility. The violation primarily relates to the electrical design and capacity of the building. The Notice of Violation required HDIP to vacate the processing facility until such alleged violations are cured. HDIP unsuccessfully attempted to negotiate temporary permits allowing it to continue operations while it addresses the alleged violations identified in the Notice of Violation. On March 29Business, ~~2012, HDIP~~Products ~~ceased processing operations at the processing facility. On April 2, 2012, HDIP notified approximately 70 of its employees working at the facility of their termination~~ and they were paid their outstanding vacation pay, however, no severance was paid. At this time, the Company has not been assessed any fines or penalties by the City of Austin, but no assurances can be made that they will not do so in the future. Services

~~Because~~A. ~~the~~Hypertension ~~City of Austin required HDIP to vacate the property at 5330 Fleming Court~~Diagnostics, ~~the landlord, Flemtex Properties (“Flemtex”) denied access to the premises; therefore, the Company did not pay rent and utilities for April and May 2012~~Inc. On ~~May~~is ~~30, 2012, the Company received~~ a ~~Notice~~consulting ~~of Termination of Lease from Flemtex, for failure to pay rent and reimbursable costs~~company. The letter stated that the Lease was terminated effective May 31, 2012, and that HDI was to quit and surrender the Leased Premises to the landlord in accordance with the requirements of the Lease on May 31, 2012, and to remove all of the Tenant’s personal property from the Leased Premises. The Company has accrued as of March 31, 2013, the utility and rent payments due for April and May 2012 totaling $139,493.

OnB. ~~July 12,~~The ~~2012, a representative from the Travis County, (Texas) Attorney Office, Texas Parks and Wildlife, and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TEEQ) searched the~~ Company’s ~~Austin~~was ~~offices~~incorporated ~~pursuant to an affidavit signed by a representative of Texas Parks and Wildlife seeking evidence that the Company committed the offense of intentional or knowing unauthorized discharge of a pollutant~~ under ~~Section 7.145 of~~ the ~~Texas~~laws ~~Water Code. No charge~~ of ~~illegal discharge has been made against~~ the ~~Company. The Company has not been contacted~~ ~~further~~State ~~relative~~of toMinnesota ~~alleged~~on ~~discharge~~July ~~and strongly denies any such discharge occurred. As of October 31~~19, ~~2012, the removal and disposal of the waste water at the Company’s former facility in Austin was completed~~1998.

10C. The Company’s SIC code is 8748 - Business Consulting Services.

~~HypertensionDiagnostics,~~D. ~~Inc~~the Company’s principle products are consulting services.

~~Notes~~Issuer’s ~~to theConsolidated Financial Statements~~facilities

~~March31~~Hypertension Diagnostics, ~~2013~~Inc. currently operates out of shared space offered to the Company at no charge by the Chief Executive Officer, and will continue to do so until the Company needs its own office space.

~~On December 14~~Officers, ~~2012~~Directors, ~~Flemtex Properties filed a lawsuit alleging breach of the commercial lease at the Fleming Court location. The lawsuit seeks damages totaling $412,711 as of November 16, 2012~~ and ~~future obligations~~Control due under the lease which extends to December 2017. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself and may seek compensation for losses resulting from the willful and malicious interference into its Fleming Court operations by the landlord and its agent. Due to the uncertainty regarding the outcome of this matter, the Company does not believe that it is probable that they will owe all of the damages claimed by Flemtex and have only accrued for the costs of the lease up until Flemtex terminated the lease on May 31, 2012, as noted above. Persons

~~Note 9~~A. ~~Deferred~~ ~~Compensation~~Names ~~Liability~~of Officers, Directors, and Control Persons.

~~The~~Liangjian ~~Company is a party to a Deferred Equity Compensation Agreement with its former CEO~~Peng, Mark N. Schwartz (the “Agreement”), whereby the Company previously granted phantom shares of its common stock to Mr. Schwartz for every month of employment over the years of his employment. Mr. Schwartz resigned as the Company’s CEO effective September 22, 2011 and as a result, agreed as of October 1, 2011 that no additional phantom shares will be granted to him under the Agreement. Under the Agreement, a cash payment will be made equal to the price per share of the Company’s common stock times the number of phantom shares accrued at the earliest of certain events to occur.

~~The~~2915 ~~Company~~Waters ~~has~~Rd ~~accrued~~#108 aEagan ~~total deferred~~MN compensation liability of $280,643 at March 31, 2013, which is the fair market value of 13,125,000 phantom shares outstanding as of March 31, 2013, $262,500 plus $18,143 of accrued payroll taxes and vacation pay related to the agreement. Due to the fluctuations in the price of the Company’s common stock during the nine months ended March 31, 2013, the Company recorded a net compensation expense of $135,994 and $0 for the three and nine months ended March 31, 2013, respectively. For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012, the Company recorded a net compensation expense (benefit) of ($393,750) and $165,000, respectively. An increase in the Company’s common stock price would cause an increase in the deferred compensation liability, while a decrease in the Company’s stock price would cause a decrease in the deferred compensation liability. Expenses related to the Deferred Compensation arrangement with its former CEO are accounted for as part of Discontinued Operations.55121

~~Under~~Owns ~~the original terms of Mr. Schwartz’s deferred equity compensation agreement~~3, payment of the deferred compensation benefit would occur upon one of the following events: i) execution of a definitive agreement resulting in a change of control of the Company’s common stock; ii) termination of employment; iii) death of the CEO; or iv) no later than January 1000,000 ~~2012.~~Preferred ~~Upon~~Series ~~one~~A ofsuper ~~these~~voting ~~events, a cash payment over 24 months was to be made to the CEO equal to the trading price per share of the Company’s common stock times the number of phantom stock~~ shares accrued to date. Mr. Schwartz and the Company modified the original Agreement on March 31, 2012, whereby Mr. Schwartz agreed to eliminate the requirement for a cash payment as of a date certain pursuant to the Agreement. This deferred compensation is classified as a long-~~term~~ ~~liability with no definitive payout date specified~~(Approx. ~~The Company and Mr. Schwartz are negotiating a permanent~~ ~~settlement~~95% ~~to satisfy both parties.~~Control)

~~Note~~B. 10Legal/Disciplinary History. ~~Factoring~~ ~~Line~~Please identify whether any of ~~Credit~~the foregoing persons have, in the last five years, been the subject of:

On October 10, 2011, HDI Plastics, Inc. entered into an Accounts Receivable Discount line facility with Charter Capital Holdings, L.P. (“Charter”). Under the terms of the full-recourse financing agreement, which is guaranteed by HDI, Charter advances to HDIP an amount equal to 80% of eligible pledged receivables up to a total advance of $1 ~~million~~. ~~Charter~~A ~~retains~~conviction ~~a priority and perfected security interest~~ in ~~all accounts~~a ~~receivable~~criminal ~~and~~proceeding ~~inventory of HDI Plastics, Inc. The financing cost under the agreement is 0.59% for each 10-day period~~ or annamed ~~approximate annualized~~as ~~interest~~a ~~cost~~defendant ~~of approximately 21.25%. HDIP began borrowing under this facility~~ in ~~November~~a ~~2011. The~~pending ~~outstanding~~criminal ~~balance~~proceeding as(excluding oftraffic ~~March~~violations ~~31, 2013 is $0~~ and $0other asminor ofoffenses): ~~June 30, 2012. As of the date of this filing, the outstanding balance is $63,383.~~NO

~~Note 11~~2. ~~Notes~~The ~~Payable-short term~~entry of an order, judgement, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, by a court of competent jurisdiction that permanently or temporarily enjoined, barred, suspended or otherwise limited such person’s involvement in any type of business, securities, commodities, or banking activities; NO

~~Asher-Convertible~~3. ~~Debt~~A finding or judgment by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, or a state securities regulator of a violation of federal or state securities or commodities law, which finding or judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated: NO

~~On January 2, 2013, HDI closed on a Securities Purchase Agreement entered into December 3, 2012 with Asher Enterprises, Inc~~4., ~~pursuant to which we issued to Asher an 8% Convertible Promissory Note in the original principal amount of $42,500 (the “Note”).~~ The ~~Note~~ ~~has~~entry ~~a maturity date~~ of ~~September~~an ~~12,~~order ~~2013 and is convertible into our common stock at the Variable Conversion Price of 58% multiplied~~ by ~~the Market Price (representing~~ a ~~discount~~self-regulatory ~~rate~~organization ofthat ~~42%).~~permanently ~~“Market~~or ~~Price”~~temporarily ~~means~~barred ~~the~~suspended ~~average of~~or ~~the~~otherwise ~~lowest~~limited ~~three~~such ~~(3)~~person’s ~~Trading~~involvement ~~Prices~~in ~~for~~any ~~the~~type Common Stock during the ten (10) Trading Day period ending on the latest complete Trading Day prior to the Conversion Date. Asher has the right to convert 180 days after the initial advance date. The shares of ~~common~~business ~~stock~~or ~~issuable~~securities ~~upon conversion of the Note are not registered shares under the Securities Act of 1933~~activities. ~~The~~ Company has the right to prepay the outstanding Note for an amount equal to 115%, multiplied by the sum of the then outstanding principal amount of this Note plus accrued and unpaid interest on the unpaid principal amount of this Note. NO

11C. Beneficial Shareholders.

~~HypertensionDiagnostics,~~The ~~Inc~~following are persons or entities owning 5% of the current outstanding shares or more as of the date of this information statement.

~~Notes~~Liangjian toPeng, ~~theConsolidated Financial Statements~~CEO

~~March31,~~2915 ~~2013~~Waters Rd #108 Eagan MN 55121

OnOwns ~~March 1~~3, ~~2013~~000,000 ~~HDI~~Preferred ~~closed~~Series onA ~~a second~~super ~~Securities~~voting ~~Purchase~~shares ~~Agreement~~- ~~with Asher, pursuant to which we issued to~~(Approx. ~~Asher an 8~~95% ~~Convertible Promissory Note in the original principal amount of $32,500 with a maturity date of December 15, 2013.~~ Control)

Due to the discounted conversion price on the date of issuance of the notes, the Company recorded a discount to the notes in the amount of $54,310 for the beneficial conversion future. The discount is being amortized over the term of the debt using the effective interest method. Additionally, Asher held back $5,000 of the proceeds to cover its legal expenses. 10

~~HDI~~Legal/Disciplinary ~~closed on a third Note dated April 8, 2013 in the amount of $32,500 that matures on January 15, 2014. The other terms of the notes are the same as the note described above.~~History

~~The following table summarizes the Asher – Convertible Debt at March 31, 2013:~~NONE

Net proceeds received	$ 70,000
Less value assigned to beneficial conversion feature	(54,310)
	15,690
Add: amortization of debt discount	8,380
Total Asher – convertible debt outstanding, net	$ 24,070

Third Party Providers

~~Senior~~Please ~~Debt~~provide the name, address, telephone number, and email address of each of the following outside providers that advise your company on matters relating to operations, business development and disclosure:

~~On February 4, 2013, HDI Plastics, Inc. executed~~ a ~~Secured Promissory Note (the “Note”) in a principal amount of $200,000 in favor of Mark Schwartz and Alan Stern, directors of the Company~~. ~~The~~ ~~Note~~Legal ~~bears~~Counsel: interest at an annual rate of 18%, payable monthly, and is guaranteed by the Company. The Note matures on February 1, 2014, at which time all principal and accrued and unpaid interest on the Note is due. The Note is secured by certain equipment of HDI Plastics. In connection with the issuance of the Note, the Company issued to each of Messrs. Schwartz and Stern a warrant to purchase 3,333,333 shares of common stock of the Company for an exercise price of $0.03 per share, subject to appropriate adjustment for stock splits, combinations and similar recapitalization events. The warrants expire on February 4, 2018. Pursuant to the terms of the Note and Security Agreement, HDI Plastics may borrow an additional $300,000 on the same terms and conditions as those set forth in the Note, Security Agreement and Warrants. The accrued interest on the Notes was $3,000 as of March 31, 2013.None

~~The total estimated value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, with a volatility of 209%, had an estimated fair value of $0~~b.01 ~~per~~Accountant ~~warrant. After~~or ~~calculating the~~Auditor: relative fair value of the debt and warrants, $48,388 was recorded as a debt discount to the debt for the warrants. This discount is being amortized over the term of the debt using the effective interest method.None

~~The~~c. ~~following~~Investor ~~table~~Relations ~~summarizes the Senior Debt at March 31, 2013~~Consultant: None

Cash proceeds received	$ 200,000
Less value assigned to warrants	(48,388)
	151,612
Add: amortization of debt discount	8,065
Total senior debt outstanding, net	$ 159,677

d. Other Advisor: None

~~Note~~Issuer ~~12. Notes Payable-long term~~Certification

~~Taylor Economic~~I, ~~Development~~Liangjian Peng certify that:

~~On December 24, 2012, HDIP entered into a Letter of Agreement with the Taylor Economic Development Corporation (“TEDCO”)~~1. ~~Under~~ ~~the~~I ~~terms~~have ofreviewed ~~the~~this ~~TEDCO~~Disclosure ~~Agreement,~~Statement ~~TEDCO agreed to advance up to $140,000 for improvements and upgrades to the Company’s new facility located in Taylor, Texas. The advances are in the form~~ of aHypertension ~~forgivable loan which will convert to a grant in 10 years provided among other conditions~~Diagnostics, ~~HDIP~~ ~~continues to operate in Taylor and maintain at least 50 full-time jobs at the Taylor facility~~Inc. Should HDIP default under its agreement with TEDCO, the Company may be required to repay the advances with interest at the prime rate plus 3%. As of March 31, 2013, $140,000 had been advanced under the TEDCO Agreement. :

122. Based on my knowledge, this disclosure statement does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this disclosure statement; and

~~HypertensionDiagnostics~~3. Based on my knowledge, ~~Inc~~the financial statements, and other financial information included or incorporated by reference in this disclosure statement, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this disclosure statement.

~~Notes~~September to19, ~~theConsolidated Financial Statements~~2019

~~March31, 2013~~Date

~~Subordinated~~/s/ ~~Debt~~Liangjian Peng

In December 2011, the Company commenced a private placement offering of 14.5% Five Year Subordinated Notes (the “Notes”) with Warrants to its existing preferred shareholders, directors of the Company and certain other accredited investors. Interest is payable monthly in cash. The offering was completed February 10, 2012 and resulted in the issuance of $833,600 in notes and five-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 11,908,572 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $0.07 per share. The notes are due five years from the closing date at 105% of face value. The total estimated value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, with a volatility rate of 153%, had an estimated fair value of $0.03 per warrant. After calculating the relative fair value of the debt and warrants, $252,393 was recorded as a debt discount to the notes for the warrants. The discount is being amortized over the term of the debt using the effective interest method. CEO

The Notes may be prepaid by the Company in accordance with the following schedule below at the redemption prices (expressed in percentages of principal amount to be repaid), plus unpaid accrued interest to the date of payment:11

Loan Year	Redemption Price
1	125%
2	120%
3	115%
4	110%
Maturity	105%

In August 2012, the Company initiated a second private placement of Subordinated Notes due October 31, 2014 (Series II Subordinated Notes) with terms otherwise similar to the offering in December 2011. Terms for the Series II Subordinated Notes also include the issuance of five-year warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $0.035 per share. As of March 31, 2013, the Company had issued to directors and other accredited investors of the Company, $360,000 in Series II Subordinated Notes which included warrants to purchase 10,285,714 shares of Company stock. The notes are due two years from the closing date at 105% of face value. The total estimated value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, with a volatility rate of 178%, had an estimated fair value from $0.01 to $0.05 per warrant. After calculating the relative fair value of the debt and warrants, $158,131 was recorded as a debt discount to the notes for the warrants. The discount is being amortized over the term of the debt using the effective interest method. Subsequent to March 31, 2013, on April 22, 2013, the Company received an additional $54,000 for private placement Series II Subordinated Notes.

The following table summarizes the entire subordinated debt balance at March 31, 2013:

Schedule of Subordinated Debt
	Series I	Series II	Total
Gross proceeds received	$ 833,600	$ 360,000	$ 1,193,600
Less value assigned to warrants	(252,393)	(158,131)	(410,524)
	581,207	201,869	783,076
Add: amortization of debt discount	63,100	41,981	105,081
Interest accreted to redemption price	10,420	4,607	15,027
Subordinated Debt outstanding	654,727	248,457	903,184
Less current maturities	-	-	-
Total Subordinated Debt	$ 654,727	$ 248,457	$ 903,184

On January 1, 2013, the Company’s board of directors approved a 4-month “Payment-in-Kind” or “PIK” interest plan on the Company’s currently outstanding Subordinated Debt Notes. The plan suspended the monthly cash payments of interest to the note holders for four months through April 1, 2013. The monthly interest will be added to the principal of the notes. We currently plan to resume monthly cash interest payments on such notes commencing May 1, 2013. As of March 31, 2013, the accrued interest payable for the Notes was $56,913.

HypertensionDiagnostics, Inc.

Notes to theConsolidated Financial Statements

March31, 2013

Note 13. Related Party Transactions

On February 4, 2013, HDI Plastics, Inc. executed a Secured Promissory Note (the “Note”) in a principal amount of $200,000 in favor of Mark Schwartz and Alan Stern, directors of the Company. The Note bears interest at an annual rate of 18%, payable monthly, and is guaranteed by the Company. The Note matures on February 1, 2014, at which time all principal and accrued and unpaid interest on the Note is due. The Note is secured by certain equipment of HDI Plastics. In connection with the issuance of the Note, the Company issued to each of Messrs. Schwartz and Stern a warrant to purchase 3,333,333 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company for an exercise price of $0.03 per share, subject to appropriate adjustment for stock splits, combinations and similar recapitalization events. The warrants expire on February 4, 2018. Pursuant to the terms of the Note and Security Agreement, HDI Plastics may borrow an additional $300,000 on the same terms and conditions as those set forth in the Note, Security Agreement and Warrants. The accrued interest on the notes was $3,000 as of March 31, 2013.

The total estimated value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model, with a volatility of 209%, had an estimated fair value of $0.01 per warrant. After calculating the relative fair value of the debt and warrants, $48,388 was recorded as a debt discount to the debt for the warrants. This discount is being amortized over the term of the debt using the effective interest method. See Note 11 for more information.

As of March 31, 2013, the Company has issued the following Subordinated Notes to the following directors of the Company, subject to the terms set forth in Note 12:

Kenneth Brimmer	$ 60,000
Mark Schwartz	$ 175,000
Larry Leitner	$ 150,000
Alan Stern	$ 185,000

On April 22, 2013, the Company received an additional $54,000 from Kenneth Brimmer, the Company’s CEO as part of the private placement of Series II Subordinated Notes (See Note 12).

The Company has agreed to pay $500 per month for executive office space from STEN Corporation. Mr. Brimmer is also CEO of STEN Corporation. As of March 31, 2013, $4,500 is unpaid under the arrangement.

Note 14. Net Income (Loss) Per Share

HypertensionDiagnostics, Inc.

Notes to theConsolidated Financial Statements

March31, 2013

The following table provides a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in calculating basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share at March 31, 2013 and 2012.

		Three months ended March 31			Nine months ended March 31,
		2013		2012	2013		2012
Basic earnings (loss) per share calculation:
Net income (loss) from continuing operations to common shareholders		$ (478,897)	$ (403,480)		$ (1,369,091)	$ (904,063)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations to common shareholders		(149,681)	409,085		(31,824)	(315,981)
Net income (loss) to common shareholders		$ (628,578)	$ 5,605		$ (1,400,915)	$ (1,220,044)
Weighted average of common shares outstanding		52,388,750	48,305,462		52,388,750	44,973,644
Basic net earnings (loss) from continuing operations		$ (0.01)	$ (0.01)		$ (0.03)	$ (0.02)
Basic net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations		$ 0.00	$ 0.01		$ 0.00	$ (0.01)
Basic net earnings (loss) per share		$ (0.01)	$ 0.00		$ (0.03)	$ (0.03)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share calculation:
Net income (loss) from continuing operations to common shareholders		$ (478,897)	$ (403,480)		$ (1,369,091)	$ (904,063)
Net income (loss) from discontinued operations to common shareholders.		(149,681)	409,085		(31,824)	(315,981)
Net income (loss) to common shareholders		$ (628,578)	$ 5,605		$ (1,400,915)	$ (1,220,044)
Weighted average of common shares outstanding		52,388,750	48,305,462		52,388,750	44,973,644
Series A Convertible Preferred Stock	[1]	-	7,336,680		-	-
Stock Options	[2]	-	-		-	-
Warrants	[3]	-	-		-	-
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		52,388,750	55,642,142		52,388,750	44,973,644
Diluted net earnings (loss) from continuing operations		$ (0.01)	$ (0.01)		$ (0.03)	$ (0.02)
Diluted net earnings (loss) from discontinued operations		$ 0.00	$ 0.01		$ (0.00)	$ (0.01)
Diluted net earnings (loss) per share		$ (0.01)	$ (0.00)		$ (0.03)	$ (0.03)

[1]	At March 31, 2013 and 2012, there were 611,390 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding. Using the preferred stock conversion ratio of 12:1, the common stock equivalents attributable to these preferred shares are 7,336,680 at March 31, 2013 and 2012.
[2]	At March 31, 2013, there were common stock equivalents attributable to outstanding stock options of 4,299,105 common shares and 8,352,914 common shares at March 31, 2012. All of the remaining stock options are anti-dilutive at March 31, 2013 and 2012, due to the loss from continuing operations, and therefore have been excluded from diluted earnings (loss) per share.
[3]	At March 31, 2013 and 2012, there were common stock equivalents of 28,860,952 and 30,407,208 common shares attributable to warrants, respectively. The warrants would not be common stock equivalents at March 31, 2013 and 2012 due to the loss from continuing operations and therefore have been excluded from diluted earnings (loss) per share.

HypertensionDiagnostics, Inc.

Notes to theConsolidated Financial Statements

March31, 2013

Note 15. Operating Lease

On December 28, 2012, as part of the Company’s plan to relocate its plastic recycling business and resume operations, HDIP entered into a four-year lease and purchase option agreement with Southern Mattress Company of Texas, Inc. for approximately 65,000 square feet of main building space, including an additional approximate 15,000 square feet of storage space in Taylor, Texas (“Taylor Lease”). The Taylor Lease calls for minimum monthly rents as follows:

Period	Minimum Monthly Rent
12/28/12 - 2/9/2013	$3,000
3/1/2013 - 2/28/2015	$8,500
3/1/2015 - 2/28/16	$12,750
3/1/2016 - 2/29/17	$20,625

In addition to rent, HDIP shall pay for insurance and property taxes effective March 1, 2013. HDIP has the right to purchase the property for $700,000 at any time after February 28, 2016.

Note 16. Subsequent Events

On April 15, 2013, HDI closed on a third note disbursement of the Securities Purchase Agreement entered into December 3, 2012 with Asher Enterprises, Inc., pursuant to which we sold to Asher an 8% Convertible Promissory Note in the amount of $32,500 (the “Note”). The Note has a maturity date of January 15, 2014 and is convertible into our common stock at the Variable Conversion Price of 58% multiplied by the Market Price (representing a discount rate of 42%). “Market Price” means the average of the lowest three (3) Trading Prices for the Common Stock during the ten (10) Trading Day period ending on the latest complete Trading Day prior to the Conversion Date. The shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Note are not registered shares under the Securities Act of 1933. The Company has the right to prepay the outstanding Note for an amount equal to 115%, multiplied by the sum of the then outstanding principal amount of this Note plus accrued and unpaid interest on the unpaid principal amount of this Note.

On April 22, 2013 the Company received an additional $54,000 from an entity controlled by Kenneth Brimmer as part of the private placement of Series II Subordinate Notes with the terms as stated in Note 12.

Beginning April 26, 2013, as the Company recommenced operations and started invoicing customers again, HDIP began borrowing under the terms of the full-recourse financing agreement with Charter Capital (See Note 10). As of the date of this filing, Charter has advanced the Company $63,383.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

We were previously engaged in the design, development, manufacture and marketing of proprietary devices. In August 2011, we sold our medical device inventory, subleased our office and manufacturing facility, and entered into a limited license agreement with a company controlled by Jay Cohn, a founder and at that time, a director of the Company. In September 2011, we formed HDI Plastics Inc. (“HDIP”), a wholly owned-subsidiary, leased a facility for warehouse and processing of recycled plastic, purchased selected manufacturing assets and began engaging in the business of plastics reprocessing in Austin, TX. On March 29, 2012, we ceased operations at the Austin facility and we began working to relocate the processing facility to a new location. In September 2012, we began disposing of the waste water stored in tanks located at 5330 Fleming, Austin. The water was transported by tanker truck to a location where contaminants were removed and it was disposed of into the city sewer system in compliance with local regulations. As of March 31, 2013, we have relocated our operations to a facility in Taylor, Texas and have recently resumed limited operations. We plan to resume production to full capacity by May 2013, assuming adequate capital is obtained to do so. We cannot guarantee that we will not encounter delays in resuming production to full capacity which may extend the date. Demand for reprocessed plastic is growing, and we believe HDIP has the systems and infrastructure for cost effectively collecting and processing post-consumer and post-industrial plastic waste into pellets to be resold to domestic manufacturing companies.

Critical Accounting Policies

The financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S., which requires us to make estimates and assumptions in certain circumstances that affect amounts reported in the accompanying financial statements and related footnotes. In preparing these financial statements, management has made its best estimates and judgments of certain amounts included in the financial statements, giving due consideration to materiality. We do not believe there is a great likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported related to the accounting policies described below. However, application of these accounting policies involves the exercise of judgment and use of assumptions as to future uncertainties and, as a result, actual results could differ from these estimates.

Principles of Consolidation. The Company files consolidated financial statements that include its wholly-owned subsidiary HDI Plastics, Inc. All material intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Revenue Recognition. Beginning October 2011, HDI Plastics began operations to sell finished goods to manufacturers in the form of pelletized resin and clean shredded and ground plastics material. These sales are recorded as revenue at the time the product is shipped and invoiced to the customer. The Company also engages in “toll” processing of customer-owned material for a service fee. These service fees are recorded as plastic processing revenue at the time the product is shipped back to the customer. In addition, the Company engages in brokerage transactions of plastic material where goods are delivered to a customer without HDIP ever taking physical possession of the product although HDIP does assume legal ownership of the material. The net profit from “brokerage” transactions is recorded as revenue at the time it is shipped to the customer and invoiced. Brokered sales are recorded as revenue net of the cost of the brokered material.

Inventories and Related Reserve for Obsolete Inventory. Inventories are valued at the lower of cost based upon the average cost of raw material purchased during the month including an allocation of manufacturing overhead, or market. Typically, the Company holds material for less than 45 days. The nature of the Company’s inventory does not result in obsolescence of either processed or unprocessed material. Inventory on hand at the end of the period is reviewed to determine the need for a reserve for possible write-off and dispose of any material which is not useable. The need for a reserve is based on management’s review of inventories on hand compared to estimated future usage and sales. As of March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012, there was no reserve for obsolete inventory.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-02, Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment. Under this standard, entities testing long-lived intangible assets for impairment now have an option of performing a qualitative assessment to determine whether further impairment testing is necessary. If an entity determines, on the basis of qualitative factors, that the fair value of the indefinite-lived intangible asset is more-likely-than-not less than the carrying amount, the existing quantitative impairment test is required. Otherwise, no further impairment testing is required. For HDI, this ASU was effective beginning January 1, 2013. The adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated results of operations or financial condition.

Results of Operations

As of March 31, 2013, we had an accumulated deficit of $30,682,216. Until we are able to generate significant revenue from our reopened plastics recycling business, we expect to continue to incur operating losses. As of March 31, 2013, we had cash and cash equivalents of $5,664. Following the end of the quarter, we raised a net $30,000 with a Securities Purchase Agreement with Asher Enterprises, (see Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements) and received an additional $54,000 in private placement subordinated notes. The cash was needed in order to continue our efforts to get the new facility in Taylor completely operational. Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent on our ability to raise the required additional capital or debt financing to meet short-term needs to restart our plastics processing operations which would include hiring additional production workers. There is no guarantee that we will be able to raise such capital or that such capital will be available on terms satisfactory to us, if at all.

Three Months Ended March 31, 2013 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2012

Revenue- The Company earned $821 and $1,840,529 in revenue from continuing operations in the quarters ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The $821 was received from the limited operations of the plastics processing business. For the quarter ended March 31, 2013, our plastics production facility had just begun operations in our new facility in Taylor, TX. For the three months ended March 31, 2012 revenue consisted of $3,240 in royalty revenue and $1,837,289 in plastic processing revenue while HDIP was in full operation in its former facility in Austin, TX. We anticipate our revenue in the quarter ending June 30, 2013 will show positive progress and we anticipate our operations will be at approximately 67% compared to our operations of last year at the same time.

Net revenues from our plastics recycling business were comprised of the following:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31
	2013	2012
Sales – Non-toll	$ 566	$ 1,604,942
Sales – Toll Processing	-	197,610
Prepaid discounts	-	(1,408)
Net processing revenue	566	1,801,144
Sales - Brokered	255	248,735
Less Brokered Purchases and Freight	-	(212,590)
Net Brokered Revenue	255	36,145
Net revenue-Plastics	$821	$1,837,289

Cost of Sales – Cost of sales were $184,530 and $1,624,477 for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The following is a summary of the cost of sales:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31
	2013	2012
Material	$ 154	$ 689,959
Labor	69,028	358,686
Depreciation	43,263	36,535
Equipment rental	1,104	14,135
Tractor trailer rental	12,777	33,374
Facility and overhead	30,997	242,143
Other costs	21,862	162,068
Rent	5,345	87,577
Total cost of sales	$184,530	$1,624,477

The significant decrease in the cost of sales for the three months ended March 31, 2013 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2012 related to the shut-down of our plastic processing facility. The current costs are mostly related to our re-start efforts for the new facility in Taylor.

Expenses - Total selling, general and administrative expenses for continuing operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013 were $188,237 compared to $566,892 for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The following is a summary of the major categories included in selling, general and administrative expenses:

	Three Months Ended
	March 31
	2013	2012
Legal and accounting	$ 26,633	$ 46,659
Payroll and related taxes	106,788	435,608
Rent and Utilities	15,061	15,647
Insurance	13,054	15,368
Travel & meals and entertainment	2,728	10,219
Other G & A Expenses	23,973	43,391
Total selling, general and administrative expenses	$ 188,237	$ 566,892

Wages, related expenses and benefits decreased from $435,608 to $106,788 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2013, due to the lay-off of sales and office employees during the shut-down beginning March 28, 2012, and HDIP conducting little or no operations for the three months ended March 31, 2013. The 2013 wages, expenses, and benefits included in SG&A are for the corporate office and one management employee in the plastics processing business.

Legal and accounting fees decreased from $46,659 to $26,633 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively. Legal fees for the three months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 related to the shutdown of operations in our facility in Austin, Texas and locating our new facilities in Taylor, Texas.

Interest expense increased from $69,197 to $106,951 for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively. The increase in the interest expense is related to the significant new debt agreements the Company has obtained over the last year.

Our net loss from continuing operations was $478,897 for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to net loss from continuing operations of $403,480 for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase in the loss was due to HDIP’s operations being shut down along with the costs being incurred to re-start operations and the continuation of general overhead expenses. For the three months ended March 31, 2013, basic and diluted net loss per share from continuing operations was $(0.01), based on weighted average common shares outstanding of 52,388,750. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, basic and diluted net loss per share per continuing operations was $(0.01) based on weighted average common shares outstanding of 48,305,462.

Nine Months Ended March 31, 2013 Compared to Nine Months Ended March 31, 2012

Revenue- The Company earned $48,880 and $3,039,301 in revenue from continuing operations in the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The revenue consisted of $5,400 of royalty income and $43,480 of plastic processing income from HDIP in the nine months ended March 31, 2013 compared to $16,320 of royalty income and $3,022,981 in plastic processing income in the nine months ended March 31, 2012. As previously noted, we were not operational during the nine months ended March 31, 2013.

Cost of Sales – Cost of sales were $588,911 and $2,859,479 for the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The following is a summary of cost of sales:

	Nine Months Ended
	March 31,
	2013	2012
Material	$ 37,182	$ 1,040,620
Labor	141,050	657,691
Depreciation	112,476	66,185
Equipment rental	40,395	17,881
Tractor trailer rental	49,853	78,991
Facility and overhead	77,021	508,802
Other costs	125,589	294,703
Rent	5,345	194,606
Total cost of sales	$588,911	$2,859,479

The significant decrease in the cost of sales for the nine months ended March 31, 2013 compared to the nine months ended March 31, 2012 relates to the shut-down of our plastic processing facility during the current fiscal year. The increase in depreciation relates to the full nine months ended March 31, 2013 and due to additional equipment purchases. Operations for our processing facility began in October 2011, therefore depreciation in the nine months ended March 31, 2012 related to depreciation in the second and third quarter. During the period of shutdown, the Company continued to incur overhead costs for removing waste water and setting up operations at the new facility in Taylor, TX.

Expenses- Total selling, general and administrative expenses for continuing operations for the nine months ended March 31, 2013 were $507,220 compared to $1,021,553 for the nine months ended March 31, 2012. The following is a summary of the major categories included in selling, general and administrative expenses:

	Nine Months Ended
	March 31,
	2013	2012
Legal	$ 63,816	$ 48,502
Accounting	17,713	56,935
Payroll and related taxes	286,060	646,529
Travel & Meals and Entertainment	10,118	15,698
Rent	19,377	31,340
Utilities	17,837	21,967
Insurance	41,236	35,105
Stock Option Expense	-	87,125
Office Supplies	7,781	12,162
Other G & A Expenses	43,282	66,190
Total selling, general and administrative expenses	$ 507,220	$ 1,021,553

Wages, related expenses and benefits decreased from $646,529 to $286,060 for the nine months ended March 31, 2012 and 2013, respectively. The 2013 wages, related expenses, and benefits included in SG&A are for the corporate office and one management employee in the plastics processing business. The Company has significantly reduced their overhead expenses during the period the plant was shut down.

Legal and audit/accounting fees decreased from $105,437 to $81,529 for the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Legal fees increased from $48,502 in the nine months ended March 31, 2012 to $63,816 for the nine months ended March 31, 2013 due to the various issues relating to the shutdown of operations at HDIP and the process of locating new facilities. Auditing fees decreased from $56,935 to $17,713 in the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively due to the timing of the work for the June 30, 2011 and 2012 financial statement audits.

Stock option expense was $0 and $87,125 for the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. This expense is based on the grant date fair value related to stock options that vested during the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012. There have been no new options granted in the last year and all options have been previously expensed.

The Company recorded $245,548 in interest expense in the nine months ended March 31, 2013 related to the various debt agreements, including the sale/leaseback transaction, and the Charter Capital line of credit. Comparably, there was $88,244 in interest expense in the nine months ended March 31, 2012. The significant increase in interest expense is due to a significant amount of new debt that has been added since December 2011 to help fund the Company’s restart efforts.

Our net loss from continuing operations was $1,369,091 for the nine months ended March 31, 2013, compared to net loss from continuing operations of $904,063 for the nine months ended March 31, 2012. The increase in the loss was due to operations being shut down and the continuation of expenses including moving expenses and the removal and disposal of waste water from the Austin, Texas location. For the nine months ended March 31, 2013, basic and diluted net loss per share from continuing operations was $(0.03), based on weighted average common shares outstanding of 52,388,750. For the nine months ended March 31, 2012, basic and diluted net loss per share per continuing operations was $(0.02) based on weighted average common shares outstanding of 44,973,644.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and cash equivalents had a net decrease of $69,379 and $371,786 for the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and March 31, 2012, respectively. The significant elements of these changes were as follows:

	Six months Ended March 31,
	2012	2012
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Net loss from continuing operations	$ (1,369,091)	$ (904,063)
Non-cash depreciation	$ 116,659	$ 67,560
Non-cash amortization of debt discount	$ 107,145	$ 14,705
Non-cash stock option expense	$ -	$ 302,822
(Increase) decrease in inventory related to the recycled
plastics processing business.	$ 31,737	$ (142,534)
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable
plastics processing business.	$ 107,090	$ (1,089,778)
Increase in accounts payable that relate to continuing
operations	$ 266,858	$ 202,053
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses relating to continuing operations	$ 41,971	$ 180,980
Net cash provided by (used in) Investing activities:
Purchase of equipment and other fixed assets in setting
up HDIP for operations	$ (250,216)	$ (630,525)
Payment received on notes receivable	$ 75,000	$ 125,000
Net cash provided by financing activities:
Factoring line of credit agreement with Charter Capital	$ -	$ 630,184
Proceeds from subordinated debt offering	$ 360,000	$ 833,600
Proceeds from Taylor Economic Development Corp	$ 140,000	$ -
Proceeds from senior debt offering	$ 200,000
Proceeds from Asher Enterprises	$ 70,000
Proceeds (payments) for sale/leaseback obligation	$ (25,933)	$ 109,813
Other:
Activity related to discontinued operations	$ (31,824)	$ (91,311)

As of March 31, 2013, we had cash and cash equivalents of $5,664. The Company has a negative working capital position of $857,619 at March 31, 2013. We expect the cash anticipated to be received from the plastics revenue generated in the next quarter, the payments to be received from the promissory note from CVC, and potential debt borrowings will be enough to continue our operations for the next few months.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Our exposure to market risks is limited to changes in interest rates. We do not use derivative financial instruments as part of an overall strategy to manage risk.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, Kenneth W. Brimmer, and Marilee Douda, our Secretary and Manager of Finance and Accounting, we have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that review, our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) and Manager of Finance and Accounting have concluded that, as of the evaluation date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not operating effectively for gathering, analyzing and disclosing the information that we are required to disclose in the reports we file under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules, and that such information is not accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO in a manner that allows for timely decisions regarding timely disclosures.

As reported in our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2012, included in “Item 9A. Controls and Procedures” of Form 10-K for the year ended June 30, 2012, as amended, the following material weaknesses existed:

Management did not maintain effective internal controls relating to the quarter-end closing and financial reporting process in adequately preparing account reconciliations pertaining to stock transactions and complicated debt instruments;

The Company has insufficient internal personnel resources and technical accounting and reporting expertise within the Company’s financial closing and reporting functions; and

A more robust inventory costing system needs to be designed to ensure accurate inventory costing each reporting period.

No remediation of these internal control weaknesses have been done at this time due to the limited discretionary funds the Company has at this time.

(b) Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no significant changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

The Company is involved in various legal actions in the ordinary course of its business.

On March 28, 2012, HDIP received a Notice of Violation related to its sole processing facility located at 5330 Fleming Court, Austin, Texas, from the City of Austin Code Compliance Department. The Notice of Violation alleges violations of Austin’s City Code and failures to obtain required permits and a Certificate of Occupancy based upon the current use of the processing facility. The violation primarily relates to the electrical design and capacity of the building. The Notice of Violation required HDIP to vacate the processing facility until such alleged violations are cured. HDIP unsuccessfully attempted to negotiate temporary permits allowing it to continue operations while it addresses the alleged violations identified in the Notice of Violation. On March 29, 2012, HDIP ceased processing operations at the processing facility. On April 2, 2012, HDIP notified approximately 70 of its employees working at the facility of their termination and they were paid their outstanding vacation pay, however, no severance was paid. The violations have not been satisfied and the Company has vacated the Austin property and has moved their operations to a new location in Taylor, TX. At this time, the Company has not been assessed any fines or penalties by the City of Austin, but no assurances can be made that they will not do so in the future. At the time of this filing, the Company still had limited operations at its new facility in Taylor, TX.

Because the City of Austin required HDIP to vacate the property at 5330 Fleming Court, the landlord, Flemtex Properties denied access to the premises; therefore, the Company did not pay rent and utilities for April and May 2012. On May 30, 2012, the Company received a Notice of Termination of Lease from Flemtex, for failure to pay rent and reimbursable costs. The letter stated that the Lease was terminated effective May 31, 2012, and that HDI was to quit and surrender the Leased Premises to the Landlord in accordance with the requirements of the Lease on May 31, 2012, and to remove all of the Tenant’s personal property from the Leased Premises. The Company is in the process of negotiating a final Termination Agreement related to its Austin lease. The Company has been informed that the landlord is withholding a final release of all obligations of the Company related to the lease until all of the discharge water is removed from the property, which was completed as of October 31, 2012.

On July 12, 2012, a representative of the Travis County, (Texas) Attorney Office, Texas Parks and Wildlife, and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TEEQ) searched the Company’s Austin offices pursuant to an affidavit signed by a representative of Texas Parks and Wildlife seeking evidence that the Company committed the offense of intentional or knowing unauthorized discharge of a pollutant under Section 7.145 of the Texas Water Code. No charge of illegal discharge has been made against the Company. The Company has not been contacted further relative to alleged discharge and strongly denies any such discharge occurred. As of October 31, 2012 the removal and disposal of the wastewater at the Company’s former facility was completed.

On December 14, 2012, Flemtex Properties filed a lawsuit alleging breach of the commercial lease at the Fleming Court location. The lawsuit seeks damages totaling $412,711as of November 16, 2012 and future obligations due under the lease through December 2017. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself and may seek compensation for losses resulting from the willful and malicious interference into its Fleming Court operations by the landlord and its agent. Due to the uncertainty regarding the outcome of this matter, the Company does not believe that it is probable that they will owe all of the damages claimed by Flemtex and have only accrued for the costs of the lease up until Flemtex terminated the lease on May 31, 2012, as noted above.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

The risk factors set forth in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2012 filed with the SEC on September 28, 2012, as amended on September 28, 2012 and October 26, 2012, contain important factors that could cause our actual business and financial results to differ materially from those contained in forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or elsewhere by management from time to time. Investors are encouraged to review and read such risk factors in relation to the statements herein.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and use of Proceeds

On January 2, 2013, HDI closed on a Securities Purchase Agreement entered into December 3, 2012 with Asher Enterprises, Inc., pursuant to which we issued to Asher an 8% Convertible Promissory Note in the original principal amount of $42,500 (the “Note”). The Note has a maturity date of September 12, 2013 and is convertible into our common stock at the Variable Conversion Price of 58% multiplied by the Market Price (representing a discount rate of 42%). “Market Price” means the average of the lowest three (3) Trading Prices for the Common Stock during the ten (10) Trading Day period ending on the latest complete Trading Day prior to the Conversion Date. Asher has the right to convert 180 days after the initial advance date. The shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the Note are not registered shares under the Securities Act of 1933. The Company has the right to prepay the outstanding Note for an amount equal to 115%, multiplied by the sum of the then outstanding principal amount of this Note plus accrued and unpaid interest on the unpaid principal amount of this Note.

On March 1, 2013, HDI closed on a second Securities Purchase Agreement with Asher, pursuant to which we issued to Asher an 8% Convertible Promissory Note in the original principal amount of $32,500 with a maturity date of December 15, 2013. HDI closed on a third Note dated April 8, 2013 in the amount of $32,500 that matures on January 15, 2014. The other terms of the notes are the same as the note described above. The Company issued these notes in reliance upon representations and warranties made by Asher that it qualified as an accredited investor under Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933.

On February 4, 2013, HDI Plastics, Inc. executed a Secured Promissory Note (the “Note”) in a principal amount of $200,000 in favor of Mark Schwartz and Alan Stern, directors of the Company. The Note bears interest at an annual rate of 18%, payable monthly, and is guaranteed by the Company. The Note matures on February 1, 2014, at which time all principal and accrued and unpaid interest on the Note is due. The Note is secured by certain equipment of HDI Plastics. In connection with the issuance of the Note, the Company issued to each of Messrs. Schwartz and Stern a warrant to purchase 3,333,333 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company for an exercise price of $0.03 per share, subject to appropriate adjustment for stock splits, combinations and similar recapitalization events. The warrants expire on February 4, 2018. Pursuant to the terms of the Note and Security Agreement, HDI Plastics may raise an additional $300,000 on the same terms and conditions as those set forth in the Note, Security Agreement and Warrants. The accrued interest on the notes was $3,000 as of March 31, 2013. The Company issued these notes in reliance upon Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933 given the director’s qualification as accredited investors of the Company.

On April 22, 2013, the Company received an additional $54,000 from an entity controlled by Kenneth Brimmer, the Company’s CEO in a private placement of a Subordinated Note. Terms for the Subordinated Note include the issuance of five-year warrants to purchase 1,542,857 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price of $.035 per share. The note is due two years from the closing date at 105% of face value. The issuance of the Subordinated Note and warrant occurred in reliance upon Regulation D of the Securities Act of 1933 given the Mr. Brimmer’s status as Chief Executive Officer and qualification as an accredited investor of the Company.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

On January 1, 2013, the Company’s board of directors approved a 4-month “Payment-in-Kind” or “PIK” interest plan on the Company’s currently outstanding Subordinated Debt Notes. The plan suspended the monthly cash payments of interest to the note holders for four months through April 1, 2013, which is a default under the terms of such notes. The monthly interest will be added to the principal of the note. We currently plan to resume monthly cash interest payments on such notes commencing May 1, 2013. As of March 31, 2013 the accrued interest payable for the loans was $56,913.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not Applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

On December 24, 2012, HDIP entered into a Letter of Agreement with the Taylor Economic Development Corporation (“TEDCO”). Under the terms of the TEDCO Agreement, TEDCO agreed to advance up to $140,000 for improvements and upgrades to the HDIP’s new facility located in Taylor, Texas. The advances are in the form of a forgivable loan which will convert to a grant in 10 years provided among other conditions, HDIP continues to operate in Taylor and maintain at least 50 full-time jobs at the Taylor facility. Should HDIP default under its agreement with TEDCO it may be required repay the advances with interest at the prime rate plus 3%. As of March 31, 2013, $140,000 had been advanced under the TEDCO Agreement.

On December 28, 2012, as part of the Company’s plan to relocate HDIP’s business and resume operations, HDIP entered into a four-year lease and purchase option agreement with Southern Mattress Company of Texas, Inc. for approximately 65,000 square feet of main building space, including an additional approximate 15,000 square feet of storage space in Taylor, Texas (“Taylor Lease”). The Taylor Lease calls for minimum monthly rents as follows:

Period	Minimum Monthly Rent
12/28/12 - 2/9/2013	$3,000
3/1/2013 - 2/28/2015	$8,500
3/1/2015 - 2/28/16	$12,750
3/1/2016 - 2/29/17	$20,625

In addition to rent, HDIP shall pay for insurance and property taxes effective March 1, 2013. HDIP will have the right to purchase the property for $700,000 at any time after February 28, 2016.

Item 6. Exhibits

(a) The following Exhibits are furnished pursuant to Item 601 of Regulation S-K:

2.1 Asset Purchase Agreement dated August 24, 2011 by and between HDI and Cohn Prevention Centers, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 31, 2011).

2.2 Tri-Party Sale Agreement dated September 23, 2011 by and among HDI Plastics, Inc., Compass Bank and Cycled Plastics, Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed September 26, 2011).

2.3* Asset Purchase Agreement dated January 25, 2013 by and between HDI and CVC-HD, LLC

3.1 Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-53025) filed on May 19, 1998).

3.2 Bylaws incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-53025) filed on May 19, 1998).

3.3 Articles of Amendment of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 (File No. 333-53025) filed on May 19, 1998).

10.1 Securities Purchase Agreement dated December 3, 2012, by and between Hypertension Diagnostics, Inc. and Asher Enterprises (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 3, 2013).

10.2 Convertible Promissory Note dated December 3, 2012 by and between Hypertension Diagnostics, Inc. and Asher Enterprises (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 3, 2013)

10.3 Lease Agreement dated December 28, 2012 by and between HDI Plastics, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of HDI, and Southern Mattress Company of Texas, Inc.

10.4 Letter of Agreement dated December 24, 2012 by and between HDI Plastics and Taylor Economic Development Corporation.

31.1* Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1* Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS* XBRL Instance Document**

101.CAL* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document**

101.DEF* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document**

101.LAB* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document**

101.PRE* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document**

101.SCH* XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document**

* Filed herewith

** In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this information deemed not “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has caused duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

HYPERTENSION DIAGNOSTICS, INC.

By /s/ Kenneth W. Brimmer

Kenneth W. Brimmer

Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer

Date: May 15, 2013

Filing Compare · HYPERTENSION DIAGNOSTICS INC /MN