UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURUTIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015

Commission File Number 000-54118

Urban Hydroponics, Inc.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

NEVADA	72-1600437
(State or Other Jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
Incorporation or Organization)	Identification No.)

c/o CKR Law LLP

1330 Avenue of the Americas, 14^th Floor
New York, NY 10019

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(561) 543-8882

(Telephone Number)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $.001 par value

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (ss.232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ☐	Accelerated Filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☐	Smaller reporting company ☒

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☒ No ☐

As of December 31, 2014, there were 34,400,000 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, issued and outstanding. Of these, 12,400,000 shares were held by non-affiliates of the registrant. The market value of securities held by non-affiliates on December 31, 2014 was $13,020,000, based on the closing price of $1.05 per share for the registrant’s Common Stock on December 31, 2014.

As of September 30, 2015, there were 34,800,000 shares of common stock at a par value of $0.001 per share, issued and outstanding.

Documents Incorporated by Reference: None

URBAN HYDROPONICS, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


		Page No.

Part I

Item 1.	Business	2
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	8
Item 2.	Properties	12
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	12
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	12

Part II

Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity & Related Stockholder Matters	13
Item 6	Selected Financial Data	15

Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition or Results of Operations	16
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	18
Item 8.	Financial Statements	18
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	18
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	18
Item 9B.	Other Information	20

Part III

Item 10.	Directors and Executive Officers	20
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	22
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management	24
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions	24
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	25

Part IV

Item 15.	Exhibits	26

Signatures		28

PART I

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. Any statements contained herein that are not statements of historical fact may be deemed to be forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. The words “believes,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “seeks,” “expects,” “intends” and similar expressions identify some of the forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance or future results and involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. The risk factors discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-K could also cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the Company’s forward-looking statements. Urban Hydroponics, Inc. undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

History

Urban Hydroponics, Inc. (formerly known as Placer Del Mar, Ltd., the “Company”) was incorporated in Nevada on May 13, 2005 for the purpose of mining and mineral exploration. Placer Del Mar, Ltd. had a mineral rights revenue sharing agreement with Mr. Jorge Alberto Almarez to explore a property in Mexico for mainly gold, tungsten, perlite, sulfides, titanium, and silver. Our revenue sharing agreement granted us the right to free access and exploration of the property together with the right to file a mining claim on the property, located 7 miles east of Rosarito, Baja California, Mexico on Avenida Canyon Rosarito, 500 meters east of Machado Cemetery (Longitude: 32 degrees, 21.15 minutes, 10 seconds North, Latitude: 118 degrees, 57.27 minutes, 46 seconds West, Elevation: 174 Meters). We filed a mining claim on April 24, 2006, with the Mexican government. From June 6, 2005, through April 24, 2006, we owned an option which granted us the right to exercise a mining claim on the Almarez property. On April 24, 2006, we exercised the option according to the terms of the option agreement. The terms of the option agreement were: $2,000 was paid to Mr. Almarez for the option, and we were to pay Almarez 10% net smelter returns royalty for any mineralization found on the property. On April 24, 2006, we entered into a new agreement with Almarez, which granted full ownership of the mineral rights located on the Almarez property to us subject to a 1% net smelter returns royalty reserved in favor of Mr. Almarez for any and all minerals extracted by us from the property. Mr. Almarez continued to own the land. Placer Del Mar owned any possible mineralization on the land or beneath the surface subject to the royalty for Almarez.

On December 8, 2010, we entered into a Mineral Extraction Agreement with Roca Cantera Y Marmol, Canteras Acabados Finos related to the extraction of only Mexican shellstone-limestone (“Conchuela”) on the property per its rights as Operator and right to appoint a nominee under the Mineral Rights Revenue Sharing Agreement dated April 24, 2006, between us and Mr. Almarez, as amended on December 8, 2010.

Under the terms of the Mineral Rights Revenue Sharing Agreement (as amended on December 8, 2010), Mr. Almarez granted to us the sole and exclusive right to establish mineral claims on the property, subject to a payment of $400,000 by us to Mr. Almarez, to be paid in equal payments over 60 months in the amount of $6,666, beginning no later than June 1, 2011, for the exclusive right to begin extracting Conchuela from the Property. Such payments would be in lieu of the original 1% Net Smelter Returns royalty originally reserved in favor of Mr. Almarez. Mr. Almarez agreed to extend the payment due date from April 1, 2012 to December 1, 2012. All minerals, other than Conchuela, mined or extracted from the Property remain subject to the 1% Net Smelter Returns royalty as stated in the original Mineral Rights Revenue Sharing Agreement.

Until October 5, 2015, our principal executive offices were located at 224 Datura Street, Suite 505, West Palm Beach, FL 33401. Our current, interim address is: Care of CKR Law LLP, 1330 Avenue of the Americas, 14^th Floor, New York, NY 10019. The telephone number is (561) 543-8882.

Termination of Mining Agreements

In June, 2013, our Board of Directors determined that the Company should cease its mining exploration activities and to refocus our business objectives to seeking, investigating and, if such investigation warrants, engaging in a business combination with a private entity whose business presents an opportunity for our shareholders. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2013, both the Mineral Rights Revenue Sharing Agreement with Mr. Almarez and the Mineral Extraction Agreement with Roca Cantera Y Marmol, Canteras Acabados Finos were terminated by the parties, with each party waiving, and relaeasding the other party from, any liabilities or obligations, past or future, under those agreements.

Our Business Plan

We are no longer engaged in the business of mining and mineral exploration. We currently hold no mineral exploration or mining rights and do not currently intend to acquire any.

We intend to seek, investigate and, if such investigation warrants, engage in a business combination with a private entity whose business presents an opportunity for our shareholders. Our objectives discussed below are extremely general and are not intended to restrict discretion of our Board of Directors to search for and enter into potential business opportunities or to reject any such opportunities.

We have no particular business combination in mind and have not entered into any negotiations regarding such a combination. Neither our officers nor any of our affiliates has engaged in any negotiations with any representative of any company regarding the possibility of an acquisition or combination between our company and such other company. We have not yet entered into any agreement, nor do we have any commitment or understanding to enter into or become engaged in a transaction.

We will not restrict our potential candidate target companies to any specific business, industry or geographical location and, thus, may acquire any type of business. Further, we may acquire or combine with a venture that is in its preliminary or development stage, one that is already in operation or one that is in a more mature stage of its corporate existence. Accordingly, business opportunities may be available in many different industries and at various stages of development, all of which will make the task of comparative investigation and analysis of such business opportunities difficult and complex.

We believe that there are numerous firms seeking the perceived benefits of a publicly registered corporation. These benefits are commonly thought to include the following:

the ability to use registered securities to acquire assets or businesses;

increased visibility in the marketplace;

greater ease of borrowing from financial institutions;

improved stock trading efficiency;

greater shareholder liquidity;

greater ease in subsequently raising capital;

ability to compensate key employees through stock options and other equity awards;

enhanced corporate image; and

a presence in the United States capital markets.

We have not conducted market research and are not aware of statistical data to support the perceived benefits of a merger or acquisition transaction for the owners of a business opportunity.

Target companies potentially interested in a business combination with us may include the following:

a company for which a primary purpose of becoming public is the use of its securities for the acquisition of other assets or businesses;

a company that is unable to find an underwriter of its securities or is unable to find an underwriter of securities on terms acceptable to it;

a company that desires to become public with less dilution of its common stock than would occur upon an traditional underwritten public offering;

a company that believes that it will be able to obtain investment capital on more favorable terms after it has become public;

a foreign company that may wish an initial entry into the United States securities markets;

a special situation company, such as a company seeking a public market to satisfy redemption requirements under a qualified employee stock option plan; or

a company seeking one or more of the other mentioned perceived benefits of becoming a public company.

The analysis of new business opportunities will be undertaken by or under the supervision of our executive officers and directors, none of whom is a business analyst. Therefore, it is anticipated that outside consultants or advisors may be utilized to assist us in the search for and analysis of qualified target companies.

A decision to participate or not in a specific business opportunity will be made based upon our analysis of the quality of the prospective business opportunity’s management and personnel, its assets, the anticipated acceptability of products or marketing concepts, the merit of a proposed business plan and numerous other factors that are difficult, if not impossible, to analyze using any objective criteria. We have unrestricted flexibility in seeking, analyzing and participating in potential business opportunities.

In our efforts to analyze potential acquisition targets, we will consider the following kinds of factors:

potential for growth, indicated by new technology, anticipated market expansion or new products;

competitive position as compared to other firms of similar size and experience within the industry segment as well as within the industry as a whole;

strength and diversity of management, either in place or scheduled for recruitment;

capital requirements and anticipated availability of required funds, to be provided by us or from operations, through the sale of additional securities, through bank loans or other commercial borrowing arrangements, through joint ventures or similar arrangements or from other sources;

the cost of participation by us as compared to the perceived tangible and intangible values and potentials;

the extent to which the business opportunity can be advanced;

the accessibility of required management expertise, personnel, raw materials, services, professional assistance and other required items; and

other relevant factors.

In applying the foregoing criteria, no one of which will be controlling, management will attempt to analyze all factors and circumstances and make a determination based upon reasonable investigative measures and available data.

Potentially available business opportunities may occur in many different industries, and at various stages of development, all of which will make the task of comparative investigation and analysis of such business opportunities extremely difficult and complex. Due to our limited capital available for investigation, we may not discover or adequately evaluate adverse facts about the opportunity to be acquired.

In implementing a structure for a particular business acquisition, we may become a party to a merger, consolidation, reorganization, joint venture, licensing agreement or other arrangement with another entity. We also may acquire stock or assets of an existing business. On the consummation of a transaction it is probable that the present management and shareholders of the company will no longer be in control of the company. In addition, some or all of our officers and directors, as part of the terms of the acquisition transaction, likely will be required to resign and be replaced by one or more new officers and directors without a vote of our shareholders.

It is anticipated that any securities issued in any such reorganization would be issued in reliance upon exemption from registration under applicable federal and state securities laws. In some circumstances, however, as a negotiated element of a transaction, we may agree to register all or a part of such securities immediately after the transaction is consummated or at specified times thereafter. The issuance of substantial additional securities and their potential sale into any trading market which may develop in our securities may have a depressive effect on that market.

While the actual terms of a transaction to which we may be a party cannot be predicted, it may be expected that the parties to the business transaction will find it desirable to avoid the creation of a taxable event and thereby structure the acquisition as a “tax-free” reorganization under Sections 351 or 368 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.

With respect to any merger or acquisition, negotiations with target company management are expected to focus on the percentage of our company that the target company shareholders would acquire in exchange for all of their shareholdings in the target company. Depending upon, among other things, the target company’s assets and liabilities, our existing shareholders will in all likelihood hold a substantially lesser percentage ownership interest in our company following any merger or acquisition. The percentage ownership of our existing shareholders may be subject to significant reduction in the event we acquire a target company with substantial assets. Any merger or acquisition effected by us can be expected to have a significant dilutive effect on the percentage of shares held by our shareholders at such time.

We will participate in a business opportunity only after the negotiation and execution of appropriate agreements. Although the terms of such agreements cannot be predicted, generally such agreements will require certain representations and warranties of the parties thereto, will specify certain events of default, will detail the terms of closing and the conditions which must be satisfied by the parties prior to and after such closing, will outline the manner of bearing costs, including costs associated with our attorneys and accountants, and will include miscellaneous other terms.

We are presently subject to the reporting requirements included of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). Included in these requirements is our duty to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) as part of a Current Report on Form 8-K after consummation of a merger or acquisition audited financial statements of the business acquired and pro forma financial information. If such audited financial statements and pro forma financial information are not available at closing, or within time parameters necessary to insure our compliance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, or if the audited financial statements provided do not conform to the representations made by the target company, the closing documents may provide that the proposed transaction will be voidable at the discretion of our present management.

It is anticipated that the investigation of specific business opportunities and the negotiation, drafting and execution of relevant agreements, disclosure documents and other instruments will require substantial management time and attention and substantial cost for accountants, attorneys and others. If a decision is made not to participate in a specific business opportunity, the costs theretofore incurred in the related investigation would not be recoverable. Furthermore, even if an agreement is reached for the participation in a specific business opportunity, the failure to consummate that transaction may result in our loss of the related costs incurred.

We do not intend to undertake any efforts to cause a market to develop in our securities, either debt or equity, until we have successfully concluded a business combination.

We intend to continue to comply with the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act for so long as we are subject to those requirements.

Recent Developments

Non-Binding Term Sheet

On May 5, 2014, Valor Invest Ltd. (“Valor”), on our behalf, signed a non-binding term sheet (the “Term Sheet”) with 0838373 B.C. Ltd., a British Columbia corporation (“Numbered Company”), Urban Cultivator Inc., a British Columbia corporation (“UC”), BC Northern Lights Enterprises Ltd., a British Columbia corporation (“BCNL”), and W3 Metal Inc., a British Columbia corporation (“W3,” and together with Numbered Company, UC and BCNL, the “Target Companies”), regarding a possible business combination (the “Merger”) involving these companies. The Target Companies are private companies engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling commercial and residential hydroponic growing systems.

Binding letter of Intent with the Target Companies

On October 3, 2014, we signed a Binding Letter of Intent (LOI), as amended on October 31, 2014 and February 23, 2015, to revise the terms of the proposed Merger with the Target Companies. This LOI replaced the non-binding Term Sheet dated May 5, 2014 and Valor was not a party to the LOI.

Pursuant to the LOI, it is contemplated that a newly-formed, wholly-owned Canadian subsidiary (“Pubco”) of the Company will merge with and into the Target Companies, as a result of which the Target Companies will become wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company. In connection with the LOI, as amended, and pursuant to its terms, the Company agreed to provide bridge financing (the “Bridge Financing”) to the Target Companies for working capital purposes. To date, the Company has provided the Target Companies with an aggregate of $1,226,000 in Bridge Financing. The secured promissory notes issued by the Target Companies in the Bridge Financing bear interest at 10% per annum and are secured by a perfected security interest in all of the assets of the Target Companies, subject to certain limited exceptions.

To finance the Bridge Financing and to provide working capital to the Company, the Company has sold an aggregate of $1,970,000 of its 10% Secured Convertible Promissory Notes (the “Investor Notes”) in a private placement to non-US persons in a number of closings from May 21, 2014 through August 5, 2015 (the “Notes Offering”), as further discussed below under “Item 5. Market for Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities – Recent Sales if Unregistered Securities.” We paid a finder $50,000 for introducing the purchasers of the Investor Notes to us.

In addition to the Notes Offering, the Company intends to engage in an additional private placement of its securities for at least an additional $1,000,000 in gross proceeds to the Company (the “Subsequent Offering”) for working capital use post-Merger closing. The closing of the Subsequent Offering and the closing of the Merger is each a condition precedent to the other. There can be no assurances, however, that the Merger and the Subsequent Offering will close as currently planned or at all.

Although the original LOI provides that the proposed Merger was expected to close on or before November 30, 2014, there has been a delay in the preparation of the audited financial statements of the Target Companies for the two fiscal years ended October 31, 2014 and it is now expected that the proposed Merger will close on or before October 31, 2015. There can be no certainty, however, that the Merger will close on that date or at all, that any transactions will be consummated with the Target Companies or that any other business projects will be identified and consummated. The Merger is subject to, among other things, the completion and delivery by the Target Companies to the Company, and the acceptance as satisfactory by the Company, of two year audited and six-month interim consolidated financial statements of the Target Companies.

Because of the delay in the closing of the Merger, nineteen (19) of the Investor Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $970,000 have reached their maturity dates (some of which were previously extended) and are now due and payable in full along with accrued and unpaid interest. Because these Investor Notes are now in default, the interest rate on the Investor Notes has begun to accrue at an annual rate of 12% from the date of default. The Company is in the process of asking the purchasers of these Investor Notes to agree to extend the maturity dates on these Investor Noes to a date after the currently projected closing date of the Merger (October 31, 2015), but there can be no assurance that any of these purchasers will agree to such an extension. If one or more of the purchasers of the Investor Notes demands payment of the principal and accrued interest on his defaulted Investor Note, we might not be able to meet such demand.

Because of the delay in the closing of the proposed Merger, our loans to the Target Companies in the aggregate amount of $1,000,000 became due and payable to us between January 20, 2015 and February 4, 2015. Under the terms of the LOI amendment dated February 23, 2015, we extended the maturity dates on these loans to May 31, 2015. Although these loans are now due and payable, we expect to further amend the LOI to further extend the maturity dates on these loans to a date after the expected closing date of the Merger. Because $1,000,000 of the loans to the Target Companies are now in default, we may be obligated to exercise our rights under the General Security Agreement with the Target Companies if we are not able to extend the maturity dates on the Investor Notes that are now in default.

Upon the closing of the Merger, in accordance with the terms of the LOI, all loans to the Target Companies under the Bridge Financing, including accrued and unpaid interest, will be forgiven. There can be no guarantee, however, that the Merger will close.

Competition

We expect to encounter substantial competition in our efforts to identify and consummate a transaction with a business opportunity. The primary competition will be from other companies organized and funded for similar purposes, small venture capital partnerships and corporations, small business investment companies and wealthy individuals, all of which may have substantially greater financial and other resources than we do. In view of our limited financial resources and limited management availability, we may be at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors.

Compliance with Government Regulation

Since the Mineral Rights Revenue Sharing Agreement and the Mineral Extraction Agreement are now terminated, we may have some residual obligations for re-contouring and re-vegetation of disturbed surface areas or other remediation work on that property. It is not possible to estimate the potential costs of such work, if any, at this time. Except as discussed above, we are currently not subject to any material governmental regulations.

Research and Development Costs During The Last Two Years

The Company has not expended funds for research and development costs since inception.

Number of Employees

The Company’s only current employee is its sole officer, Frank Terzo, who will devote as much time as the Board of Directors determines is necessary to manage the affairs of the Company.

Reports to Security Holders

We are subject to disclosure filing requirements under the Exchange Act, including filing Form 10-K annually and Form 10-Q quarterly. In addition, we will file Form 8-K and other proxy and information statements from time to time as required. The public may read and copy any materials that we file with the Securities and Exchange Commission, (“SEC”), at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an Internet site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K CONTAINS CERTAIN STATEMENTS RELATING TO FUTURE EVENTS OR THE FUTURE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF OUR COMPANY. YOU ARE CAUTIONED THAT SUCH STATEMENTS ARE ONLY PREDICTIONS AND INVOLVE RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES, AND THAT ACTUAL EVENTS OR RESULTS MAY DIFFER MATERIALLY. IN EVALUATING SUCH STATEMENTS, YOU SHOULD SPECIFICALLY CONSIDER THE VARIOUS FACTORS IDENTIFIED IN THIS ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K, INCLUDING THE MATTERS SET FORTH BELOW, WHICH COULD CAUSE ACTUAL RESULTS TO DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE INDICATED BY SUCH FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS.

An investment in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the following risk factors before deciding to invest in our company. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects for growth would likely suffer. As a result, you may lose all or part of your investment in our company.

We are a development stage company and may never be able to effectuate our business plan.

We intend to seek, investigate and, if such investigation warrants, engage in a business combination with a private entity whose business presents an opportunity for our shareholders. As a development stage company with limited resources we may not be able to successfully effectuate our business plan. There can be no assurance that we will ever achieve any revenues or profitability. The revenue and income potential of our proposed business and operations is unproven as the lack of operating history makes it difficult to evaluate the future prospects of our business.

We require financing to acquire businesses and implement our business plan. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in obtaining financing or acquiring businesses, or in operating those acquired businesses in a profitable manner.

The extended delay in the closing of our proposed merger with the Target Companies could result in the failure of our business.

Because of the delay in the closing of the Merger, nineteen (19) of the Investor Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $970, 000 have reached their previously amended maturity dates and are now in default. Also, our loans to the Target Companies in the aggregate amount of $1,000,000 became due and payable on May 31, 2015 and are now in default as well. If the purchasers of the Investor Notes in default do not agree to extend the maturity dates on those notes, we will not be able to repay those notes without raising additional capital, which capital might not be available to us. As a result, we might be forced to exercise our rights under our security agreement with the Target Companies to take possession of the Target Companies collateral (as that term is defined in the security agreement). In any case, we might not be able to repay the purchasers of the defaulted Investor Notes in full or at all. Such an outcome would have an extremely deleterious impact on our business.

We expect losses in the future because we have no revenue.

As we have no current revenue, we are expecting losses over the next 12 months because we do not yet have any revenues to offset the expenses associated with our business plan. We cannot guarantee that we will ever be successful in generating revenues in the future. We recognize that if we are unable to generate revenues, we will not be able to earn profits or continue operations. There is no history upon which to base any assumption as to the likelihood that we will prove successful, and we can provide investors with no assurance that we will generate any operating revenues or ever achieve profitable operations.

If our business plans are not successful, we may not be able to continue operations as a going concern and our stockholders may lose their entire investment in us.

Since inception, we have had no revenues and incurred a cumulative net loss of $1,297,717 through June 30, 2015. This raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We will, in all likelihood, sustain operating expenses without corresponding revenues, at least until the consummation of a business combination. This may result in our incurring a net operating loss that will increase continuously until we can consummate a business combination with a profitable business opportunity. We cannot assure you that we can identify a suitable business opportunity and consummate a business combination. If we cannot continue as a going concern, our stockholders may lose their entire investment in us.

Future success is highly dependent on the ability of management to locate and attract a suitable acquisition.

The success of our proposed plan of operation will depend to a great extent on the operations, financial condition and management of the identified target company. While business combinations with entities having established operating histories are preferred, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in locating candidates meeting such criteria. The decision to enter into a business combination will likely be made without detailed feasibility studies, independent analysis, market surveys or similar information which, if we had more funds available to it, would be desirable. In the event we complete a business combination the success of our operations will be dependent upon management of the target company and numerous other factors beyond our control. We cannot assure you that we will identify a target company and consummate a business combination.

There is competition for those private companies suitable for a merger or combination transaction of the type contemplated by management.

We are in a highly competitive market for a small number of business opportunities which could reduce the likelihood of consummating a successful business combination. We are and will continue to be an insignificant participant in the business of seeking mergers with, joint ventures with and acquisitions of small private and public entities. A large number of established and well-financed entities, including small public companies and venture capital firms, are active in mergers and acquisitions of companies that may be desirable target candidates for us. Nearly all these entities have significantly greater financial resources, technical expertise and managerial capabilities than we do; consequently, we will be at a competitive disadvantage in identifying possible business opportunities and successfully completing a business combination. These competitive factors may reduce the likelihood of our identifying and consummating a successful business combination.

We have not conducted market research to identify business opportunities, which may affect our ability to identify a business to merge with or acquire.

We have neither conducted nor have others made available to us results of market research concerning prospective business opportunities. Therefore, we have no assurances that market demand exists for a merger or acquisition as contemplated by us. Our management has not identified any specific business combination or other transactions for formal evaluation by us, such that it may be expected that any such target business or transaction will present such a level of risk that conventional private or public offerings of securities or conventional bank financing will not be available. There is no assurance that we will be able to acquire a business opportunity on terms favorable to us. Decisions as to which business opportunity to participate in will be unilaterally made by our management, which may act without the consent, vote or approval of our stockholders.

Management intends to devote only a limited amount of time to seeking a target company, which may adversely impact our ability to identify a suitable acquisition candidate.

While seeking a business combination, management anticipates devoting very limited time to our affairs in total. None of our officers has entered into a written employment agreement with us and is not expected to do so in the foreseeable future. This limited commitment may adversely impact our ability to identify and consummate a successful business combination.

We are dependent on the services of our executive officers to obtain capital required to implement our business plan and for identifying, investigating, negotiating and integrating potential acquisition opportunities. The loss of services of senior management could have a substantial adverse effect on us. The expansion of our business will be largely contingent on our ability to attract and retain highly qualified corporate and operations level management team. We cannot assure you that we will find suitable management personnel or will have financial resources to attract or retain such people if found.

The time and cost of preparing a private company to become a public reporting company may preclude us from entering into a merger or acquisition with the most attractive private companies.

Target companies that fail to comply with SEC reporting requirements may delay or preclude acquisition. Sections 13 and 15(d) of the Exchange Act require reporting companies to provide certain information about significant acquisitions, including audited financial statements for the company acquired.

The time and additional costs that may be incurred by some target entities to prepare these statements may significantly delay or essentially preclude consummation of an acquisition. Otherwise suitable acquisition prospects that do not have or are unable to obtain the required audited statements may be inappropriate for acquisition so long as the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act are applicable.

We may be subject to further government regulation which would adversely affect our operations.

Although we will be subject to the reporting requirements under the Exchange Act, management believes we will not be subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “Investment Company Act”), since we will not be engaged in the business of investing or trading in securities. If we engage in business combinations that result in our holding passive investment interests in a number of entities, we could be subject to regulation under the Investment Company Act. If so, we could be required to register as an investment company and could be expected to incur significant registration and compliance costs. We have obtained no formal determination from the SEC as to our status under the Investment Company Act and, consequently, violation of the Investment Company Act could subject us to material adverse consequences.

Any potential acquisition or merger with a foreign company may subject us to additional risks.

If we enter into a business combination with a foreign concern, we will be subject to risks inherent in business operations outside of the United States. These risks include, for example, currency fluctuations, regulatory problems, punitive tariffs, unstable local tax policies, trade embargoes, risks related to shipment of raw materials and finished goods across national borders and cultural and language differences. Foreign economies may differ favorably or unfavorably from the United States economy in growth of gross national product, rate of inflation, market development, rate of savings, and capital investment, resource self-sufficiency and balance of payments positions, and in other respects.

We will need to raise additional capital to execute our business plan. If our operations do not produce the necessary cash flow, or if we cannot obtain needed funds, we may be forced to reduce or cease our activities with consequent loss to investors.

We have a need for cash in order to pay obligations currently due in a timely manner, and to finance our business operations. Our continued operations will depend upon the sustainability of cash flow from our ability to raise additional funds, as required, through equity or debt financing. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain additional funding when it is needed, or that such funding, if available, will be obtainable on terms acceptable to us. If we cannot obtain needed funds, we may be forced to reduce or cease our activities with consequent loss to investors. In addition, should we incur significant presently unforeseen expenses or delays, we may not be able to accomplish our goals.

If we fail to develop and maintain an effective system of internal controls, we may not be able to accurately report our financial results or prevent fraud, as a result, current and potential shareholders could lose confidence in our financial reports, which could harm our business and the trading price of our common stock.

Effective internal controls are necessary for us to provide reliable financial reports and effectively prevent fraud. Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires us to evaluate and report on our internal controls over financial reporting. We plan to comply with Section 404 by strengthening, assessing and testing our system of internal controls to provide the basis for our report. The process of strengthening our internal controls and complying with Section 404 is expensive and time consuming, and requires significant management attention, especially given that we have not yet undertaken any efforts to comply with the requirements of Section 404. We cannot be certain that the measures we will undertake will ensure that we will maintain adequate controls over our financial processes and reporting in the future. Furthermore, if we are able to rapidly grow our business, the internal controls that we will need will become more complex, and significantly more resources will be required to ensure our internal controls remain effective. Failure to implement required controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations. If we discover a material weakness in our internal controls, the disclosure of that fact, even if the weakness is quickly remedied, could diminish investors’ confidence in our financial statements and harm our stock price. In addition, non-compliance with Section 404 could subject us to a variety of administrative sanctions, including the suspension of trading, ineligibility for listing on the OTC Bulletin Board, one of the national securities exchanges, and the inability of registered broker-dealers to make a market in our common stock, which would further reduce our stock price.

Our principal stockholder owns a controlling interest in our voting stock and investors will not have any voice in our management, which could result in decisions adverse to our general shareholders.

Humberto Bravo beneficially owns approximately 63% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, he will have the ability to control substantially all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval including: (a) election of our Board of Directors; (b) removal of any of our directors; (c) amendments of our Certificate of Incorporation or bylaws; (d) adoption of measures that could delay or prevent a change in control or impede a merger, takeover or other business combination involving us, or (e) other significant corporate transactions.

Our failure to adopt certain corporate governance procedures may prevent us from obtaining a listing on a national securities exchange.

Our director is not considered “independent” as that term is defined in the rules of any national securities exchange. As a result, we do not have an audit, compensation or nominating and corporate governance committee. The functions of such committees would perform are performed by the Board of Directors as a whole. Consequently, there is a potential conflict of interest in Board of Directors decisions that may adversely affect our ability to become a listed security on a national securities exchange and as a result adversely affect the liquidity of our common stock.

Trading in our shares of common stock is limited, and will not improve unless we increase our sales, become profitable and secure more active market makers.

There is a limited trading market for our common stock. There can be no assurance that a regular trading market for our securities will ever develop or that if developed it will be sustained. The trading price of our securities could be subject to wide fluctuations, in response to quarterly variations in our operating results, announcements by us or others, developments affecting us, and other events or factors. In addition, the stock market has experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations in recent years. These fluctuations have had a substantial effect on the market prices for many companies, often unrelated to the operating performance of such companies, and may adversely affect the market prices of the securities Such risks could have an adverse effect on the stock’s future liquidity.

We may, in the future, issue additional common shares, which would reduce investors’ percent of ownership and may dilute our share value.

Our Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, authorizes the issuance of 50,000,000 shares of common stock. The future issuance of common stock may result in substantial dilution in the percentage of our common stock held by our then existing shareholders. We may value any common stock issued in the future on an arbitrary basis. The issuance of common stock for future services or acquisitions or other corporate actions may have the effect of diluting the value of the shares held by our investors, and might have an adverse effect on any trading market for our common stock.

Our common shares are subject to the “penny stock” rules of the SEC, and the trading market in our securities is limited, which makes transactions in our stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of an investment in our stock.

Rule 15g-9 under the Exchange Act establishes the definition of a “penny stock,” for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require: (a) that a broker or dealer approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks; and (b) the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.

In order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must: (a) obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the person; and (b) make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the Commission relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form: (a) sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and (b) that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction. Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the “penny stock” rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of our Common shares and cause a decline in the market value of our stock.

Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.

Because we do not intend to pay any cash dividends on our common stock, our stockholders will not be able to receive a return on their shares unless they sell them.

We intend to retain any future earnings to finance the development and expansion of our business. We do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Unless we pay dividends, our stockholders will not be able to receive a return on their shares unless they sell them. We cannot assure you that you will be able to sell shares when you desire to do so.

ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Until October 5, 2015, the Company’s principal executive office address was 224 Datura Street, Suite 505, West Palm Beach, FL 33401. These principal executive office and facilities were provided by the officer & director of the corporation. The office was used by him for other business interests and was estimated to be sufficient for our business needs. Our current, interim address is c/o CKR Law LLP, 1330 Avenue of the Americas, 14^th Floor, New York, NY 10019.

We currently have no investment policies as they pertain to real estate, real estate interests or real estate mortgages.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not currently involved in any legal proceedings and we are not aware of any pending or potential legal actions.

ITEM 4. MINING SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUIOTY SECURITIES

Market Information

Our common stock currently trades on the OTC Markets Group Inc. QB Tier under the symbol URHY. There has been a minimal amount of active trading of our common stock during the year ended June 30, 2015 and there is no assurance that a regular trading market will ever develop. As reported by OTC Markets, Inc., the closing price of our common stock on September 30, 2015 was $0.85.

Holders

As of the date of this report there were 19 holders of record of our Common Stock, based on information provided by our transfer agent.

Dividends

To date, we have not paid dividends on shares of our Common Stock and we do not expect to declare or pay dividends on shares of our Common Stock in the foreseeable future. The payment of any dividends will depend upon our future earnings, if any, our financial condition, and other factors deemed relevant by our Board of Directors.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

On February 15, 2015, we issued 400,000 shares of our common stock to the designee of a former service provider in exchange for settlement in full of an outstanding balance of $211,138.07 for services provided by such service provider. This issuance was exempt from the registration provisions of the Securities Act, pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.

Between May 21, 2014 and August 5, 2015, we held multiple closings of out Notes Offering in which we sold an aggregate of $1,970,000 in principal amount of our 10% Secured Convertible Promissory Notes (the “Convertible Promissory Notes”) to a total of twenty three (23) investors.

On August 21, 2015, we entered into a professional relations and consulting agreement with Acorn Management Partners, LLC (“Acorn”) pursuant to which in exchange for the development of a market awareness program for us and along with certain cash compensation we agreed to issue to Acorn 25,000 restricted shares of our common stock upon signing, 25,000 additional restricted shares if we extend the agreement for a second three month period and an additional 25,000 restricted shares for every six month extension thereafter so long as certain benchmarks are met by Acorn. We have not yet issued the initial 25,000 shares to Acorn. This issuance is exempt from the registration provisions of the Securities Act, pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.

On September 8, 2015, we entered into an investor relations services agreement with Hilton Advisory Group, Inc. (“Hilton”) pursuant to which in exchange for the provision of internet based corporate development services for us and along with certain cash compensation we agreed to issue to Hilton 20,000 restricted shares of our common stock upon signing. We have not yet issued these shares to Hilton. This issuance is exempt from the registration provisions of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.

The Investor Notes were offered and sold in the Notes Offering to a limited number of non-U.S. persons pursuant to the exemptions from the registration requirements of the Securities Act, provided by Section 4(a)(2) thereof, and Regulation S thereunder.

We paid a $50,000 finder fee to one consultant in connection with the offer and sale of the Convertible Promissory Notes in the Notes Offering.

We have used $1,226,000 of the net proceeds derived from our issuance of the Convertible Promissory Notes to provide the Bridge Financing to the Target Companies for working capital purposes. The Bridge Financing is evidenced by Secured Bridge Loan Promissory Notes from the Target Companies to us. We are using the remainder of the net proceeds of the Notes Offering for general working capital purposes.

The Convertible Promissory Notes bear interest at a rate of 10% per annum and are for a term of 8 months (“Maturity”). The Convertible Promissory Notes are automatically convertible, subject to a 4.99% conversion blocker, upon closing of the proposed Merger with the Target Companies into units (the “Units”), at a conversion price of $0.30 per Unit. Each Unit consists of one (1) share of our common stock, $0.001 par value per share, and a warrant to purchase one (1) share of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.35 per share for two (2) years. Upon the closing of the proposed Merger, we will issue to each of the purchasers of the Convertible Promissory Notes warrants (the “Bridge Warrants”) to purchase a number of shares of our common stock equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the number of shares of our common stock comprising the Units, exercisable at a price of $0.35 per share, exercisable for two (2) years from the closing of the proposed Merger. The Bridge Warrants will have weighted average anti-dilution protection. If the proposed Merger does not close, the Convertible Promissory Notes along with accrued and unpaid interest must be repaid in full at Maturity.

As discussed above, $970,000 in principal amount of the Investor Notes have reached their maturity dates and are in default. We are in discussions with the purchasers of these notes to further extend the maturity dates, however, there can be no assurances that we will be successful in these efforts.

Securities Authorized For Issuance Under The Equity Compensation Plans

In April 2012, we adopted the 2012 Plan. The 2012 Plan was approved by our Board of Directors and the Majority Shareholder. In May 2014, the number of shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under the 2012 Plan was reduced to 380,000 from 7,000,000 shares. This reduction was adopted in view of our 20 for 1 forward stock split in the form of a dividend, which, taking into account the automatic adjustment provisions for stock dividends set forth in Section 14(a) (iii) of the 2012 Plan, resulted in 7,600,000 shares of our common stock being available for grant under the 2012 Plan following effectiveness of the forward stock split. This change was approved by the Majority Shareholder on May 31, 2014.

We have not maintained any other equity compensation plans since our inception.

The following table provides information as of June 30, 2015, with respect to the shares of common stock that were available for issuance under the 2012 Plan:

Plan Category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))⁽²⁾
	(a)		(b)		(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		—		—		7,600,000
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—		—		—
Total		—		—		7,600,000

Restrictions on the Use of Rule 144 by Shell Companies or Former Shell Companies

Historically, the SEC staff has taken the position that Rule 144 is not available for the resale of securities initially issued by companies that are, or previously were, shell companies like us, to their promoters or affiliates despite technical compliance with the requirements of Rule 144. The SEC has codified and expanded this position in recent amendments by prohibiting the use of Rule 144 for resale of securities issued by any shell companies (other than business combination related shell companies) or any issuer that has been at any time previously a shell company. The SEC has provided an exception to this prohibition, however, if the following conditions are met:


·	the issuer of the securities that was formerly a shell company has ceased to be a shell company;

·	the issuer of the securities is subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act;

·	the issuer of the securities has filed all Exchange Act reports and material required to be filed, as applicable, during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports and materials), other than Form 8-K reports; and

·	at least one year has elapsed from the time that the issuer filed current Form 10 type information with the SEC reflecting its status as an entity that is not a shell company.

As a result, our existing stockholders will not be able to sell the shares pursuant to Rule 144 without registration one year after we have completed our initial business combination assuming we meet the four conditions of a former shell company stated above at such time.

Penny Stock Rules

The trading in our shares is regulated by Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15g-9 which established the definition of a “penny stock.”

The Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15g-9 establishes the definition of a “penny stock”, for the purposes relevant to the Company, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require: (a) that a broker or dealer approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks; and (b) the broker or dealer receive from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased. In order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must (a) obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the person; and (b) make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks. The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the broker/dealer relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form, (a) sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and (b) that the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction. Before you trade a penny stock your broker is required to tell you the offer and the bid on the stock, and the compensation the salesperson and the firm receive for the trade. The firm must also mail a monthly statement showing the market value of each penny stock held in your account.

Stock Transfer Agent

Our stock transfer agent is Island Stock Transfer, 100 2nd Ave., South, Suite 705S, St. Petersburg, FL 33701.

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. See “Forward-Looking Statements.” Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors discussed in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Report.

The following discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations is based on the preparation of our financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. You should read this discussion and analysis together with such financial statements and the related notes thereto.

Going Concern

In the course of its development activities, the Company has sustained losses and expects such losses to continue through at least into the second quarter of fiscal 2016. The Company expects to finance its operations primarily through one or more future financings. However, there exists substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for at least the next twelve months, because the Company will be required to obtain additional capital in the future to continue its operations and there is no assurance that it will be able to obtain such capital, through equity or debt financing, or any combination thereof, or on satisfactory terms or at all. Our independent auditors have included an explanatory paragraph in their report on our consolidated financial statements included in this report that raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that may result from the outcome of this uncertainty. We have generated minimal operating revenues since our inception. We had an accumulated deficit of $1,086,900 as of June 30, 2015. Our continuation as a going concern is dependent upon future events, including our ability to identify a suitable business combination, to raise additional capital and to generate positive cash flows. Our audited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which implies we will continue to meet our obligations and continue our operations for the next twelve months. Realization values may be substantially different from carrying values as shown, and our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability or classification of recorded asset amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might be necessary as a result of the going concern uncertainty.

Overview

Historically, we were engaged in the business of exploring for minerals. In June 2013, our management determined to discontinue our minerals exploration activities and to focus on attempting to acquire other assets or business operations that would maximize shareholder value. Although we have signed the letter of Intent with the Target Companies for the proposed merger, there is no certainty that any transactions will be consummated with the Target Companies or that any other business projects will be identified and consummated. See Part I, Item 1, “Business—Our Business Plan,” and Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” for additional information and risks associated with our proposed business plan.

We expect that we will need to raise funds in addition to those raised in the Notes Offering in order to effectuate our business plan. We may seek additional investors to purchase our stock or debt to provide us with additional working capital to fund our operations. Thereafter, we will seek to establish or acquire businesses or assets with additional funds raised either via the issuance of shares or debt. There can be no assurance that additional capital will be available to us at all or on acceptable terms. We may seek to raise the required capital by other means. We may have to issue debt or equity or enter into a strategic arrangement with a third party. We currently have no agreements, arrangements or understandings with any person to obtain funds through bank loans, lines of credit or any other sources. Since we have no such arrangements or plans currently in effect, our inability to raise additional funds will have a severe negative impact on our ability to remain a viable company. In pursuing the foregoing goals, we may seek to expand or change the composition of the Board or make changes to our current capital structure, including issuing additional shares or debt.

We do not expect to generate any revenues over the next twelve months. Our principal business objective for the next twelve months will be to consummate the Merger with the Target Companies and, if that fails, to seek, investigate and, if such investigation warrants, engage in a business combination with a different private entity whose business presents an opportunity for our shareholders.

During the next 12 months we anticipate incurring costs related to filing of Exchange Act reports, and possible costs relating to consummating an acquisition or combination. We believe we will be able to meet these costs through use of funds in our treasury and additional amounts, as necessary, to be loaned by or invested in us by our stockholders, management or other investors. We have no specific plans, understandings or agreements with respect to the raising of such funds, and we may seek to raise the required capital by the issuance of equity or debt securities or by other means. Since we have no such arrangements or plans currently in effect, our inability to raise funds for the consummation of an acquisition may have a severe negative impact on our ability to become a viable company. We estimate that the level of working capital needed for these general and administrative costs for the next twelve months will be approximately $200,000. However, this estimate is subject to change, depending on the number of transactions in which we ultimately become involved.

We intend to contract out certain technical and administrative functions on an as-needed basis in order to conduct our operating activities. Our management team will select and hire these contractors and manage and evaluate their work performance.

Results of Operations

Year Ended June 30, 2015, compared to Year Ended June 30, 2014

During the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, we did not generate any revenues. During the year ended June 30, 2015, we incurred $788,224 in general and administrative expenses and $136,943 in interest expense. During the year ended June 30, 2014 we incurred $292,185 in general and administrative expenses and $6,422 in interest expense. The increase in general and administrative expense from the same period in 2014 is mainly due to increased consulting and legal expenses. For the year ended June 30, 2015 we generated $94,946 in interest income. For the year ended June 30, 2014 we generated $5,379 in interest income.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our cash in the bank at June 30, 2015 was $45,115. There was $1,449,472 provided by financing activities for the year ended June 30, 2015.

Cash provided by financing since inception was $256,200 from the sale of shares, $1,935,000 from the sale of our Convertible Promissory Notes and $56,162 from related party loans.

We estimate our general and administrative costs will require approximately $575,000 for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2016, exclusive of any business acquisition or combination costs. To meet these expected costs, we plan to use our existing working capital and to raise any necessary funds through loans from affiliates or others.

We may be unable to secure additional financing on terms acceptable to us, or at all, at times when we need such financing. Our inability to raise additional funds on a timely basis could prevent us from achieving our business objectives and could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and the value of our securities.

If we raise additional funds by issuing additional equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership percentages of existing stockholders will be reduced and the securities that we may issue in the future may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of the current holders of our common stock. Such securities may also be issued at a discount to the market price of our common stock, resulting in possible further dilution to the book value per share of common stock. If we raise additional funds by issuing debt, we could be subject to debt covenants that could place limitations on our operations and financial flexibility.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.

We regularly evaluate the accounting policies and estimates that we use to prepare our financial statements. A complete summary of these policies is included in the notes to our financial statements. In general, management’s estimates are based on historical experience, on information from third party professionals, and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates made by management.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

We have implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect. These pronouncements did not have any material impact on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and we do not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.


ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Our financial statements are included beginning immediately following the signature page to this report. See Item 15 for a list of the consolidated financial statements included herein.

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our senior management, consisting of Frank Terzo, our President, Treasurer and Secretary (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer), as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our senior management, consisting of Frank Terzo, our President, Treasurer and Secretary (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2015. Based on the evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, and in light of the material weaknesses found in our internal controls over financial reporting, Frank Terzo, our President, Treasurer and Secretary (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) or 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and includes those policies and procedures that:


·	Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

·	Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and

·	Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Because of the inherent limitations of internal control, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, though not eliminate, this risk.

As of June 30, 2015, our management, consisting of Frank Terzo, our President, Treasurer and Secretary (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer), assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in Internal Control--Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) and SEC guidance on conducting such assessments. Based on that evaluation, we believe that, during the period covered by this report, such internal controls and procedures were not effective to detect the inappropriate application of US GAAP rules as more fully described below. This was due to deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of our internal controls over financial reporting that adversely affected our internal controls and that may be considered to be material weaknesses.

The matters involving internal controls and procedures that our management considered to be material weaknesses under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board were: (1) lack of a functioning audit committee and a lack of independent directors on our Board of Directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; (2) inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives; and (3) ineffective controls over period end financial disclosure and reporting processes. The aforementioned material weaknesses were identified by Frank Terzo, our President, Treasurer and Secretary (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer) in connection with the review of our financial statements as of June 30, 2015.

Management believes that the material weaknesses set forth in items (2) and (3) above did not have an effect on our financial results. However, management believes that the lack of a functioning audit committee and the lack of independent directors on our Board of Directors results in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures, which could result in a material misstatement in our financial statements in future periods.

Management’s Remediation Initiatives

In an effort to remediate the identified material weaknesses and other deficiencies and enhance our internal controls, we have initiated, or plan to initiate, the following series of measures:


·	Assuming we are able to secure sufficient additional working capital, we will create a position to segregate duties consistent with control objectives and will increase our personnel resources and technical accounting expertise within the accounting function when funds are available to us.

·	We also plan to appoint one or more outside directors to our Board of Directors who shall be appointed to an audit committee resulting in a fully functioning audit committee which will undertake the oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures such as reviewing and approving estimates and assumptions made by management.

Management believes that the appointment of one or more independent directors, who shall be appointed to a fully functioning audit committee, will remedy the lack of a functioning audit committee and a lack of a majority of independent directors on our Board of Directors.

We anticipate that these initiatives will be implemented in conjunction with the growth of our business.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with our evaluation we conducted of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2015, that occurred during our fourth quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

Directors and Executive Officers

Set forth in the table below is the name and age of each director and executive officer of Urban Hydroponics, Inc. as of the date of this annual report, together with all positions and offices of the Company held by each and the term of office and the period during which each has served:

NAME

AGE

POSITION(S)

Frank Terzo (1)

President, Secretary, Treasurer,

Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and sole member of the Board of Directors

(1)	Mr. Terzo was appointed to his offices/positions on February 27, 2014, and is expected to hold his offices/positions until we engage in a business combination with a private entity whose business presents an opportunity for our shareholders.

Directors are elected to serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified. Officers are appointed to serve until the meeting of the Board of Directors following the next annual meeting of stockholders and until their successors have been elected and qualified.

Business Experience

The principal occupation and business experience during at least the past five years for our sole executive officer and director is as follows:

Frank Terzo was appointed as the Company’s sole director and its President, Treasurer and Secretary on February 27, 2014. From 2010 to 2014 he was Co-Founder, Chairman and CEO of Viewpoint Holdings, Inc. From 2009 to 2010 he was Director and President of Boca Tanning Club. From 2007 to 2009 he was Director and Consultant of V1 Private Jets. Mr. Terzo previously worked in many industries including restaurants, real estate and investment banking.

Mr. Terzo has a strong business background, which makes him well-suited to serve on our Board of Directors.

Identification of Significant Employees

We have no employees other than Frank Terzo, our sole officer.

Family Relationship

We currently do not have any officers or directors of our company who are related to each other.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

No executive officer or director of ours has been involved in the last ten years in any of the following:


·	Any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business or property of such person, or of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time;

·	Any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

·	Being subject to any order, judgment, or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities;

·	Being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended, or vacated;

·	Being the subject of or a party to any judicial or administrative order, judgment, decree or finding, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated relating to an alleged violation of any federal or state securities or commodities law or regulation, or any law or regulation respecting financial institutions or insurance companies, including, but not limited to, a temporary or permanent injunction, order of disgorgement or restitution, civil money penalty or temporary or permanent cease-and-desist order, or removal or prohibition order, or any law or regulation prohibiting mail, fraud, wire fraud or fraud in connection with any business entity; or

·	Being the subject of or a party to any sanction or order, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any self-regulatory organization (as defined in Section 3(a)(26) of the Exchange Act, any registered entity (as defined in Section 1(a)(29) of the Commodity Exchange Act), or any equivalent exchange, association, entity or organization that has disciplinary authority over its members or persons associated with a member.

Section 16(A) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Our common stock is registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Exchange Act. Accordingly, our officers, directors and principal shareholders are subject to the beneficial ownership reporting requirements of Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. Section 16(a) requires our directors and executive officers, and persons who own more than ten percent of our common stock, to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial reports of ownership and reports of changes of ownership of our common stock. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulation to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.

We intend to ensure to the best of our ability that all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners are complied with in a timely fashion.

Code of Ethics

We do not currently have a code of ethics. Because of our limited business operations and having only one officer and director, we believe a code of ethics would have limited utility. We intend to adopt such a code of ethics as our business operations expand and we have more directors, officers and employees.

Board Committees

We currently have not established any committees of the Board of Directors. Our Board of Directors may designate from among its members an executive committee and one or more other committees in the future. We do not have a nominating committee or a nominating committee charter. Further, we do not have a policy with regard to the consideration of any director candidates recommended by security holders. To date, no security holders have made any such recommendations. Our sole director performs all functions that would otherwise be performed by committees. Given the present size of our Board of Directors it is not practical for us to have committees. If we are able to grow our business and increase our operations, we intend to expand the size of our Board of Directors and allocate responsibilities accordingly.

Shareholder Communications

Currently, we do not have a policy with regard to the consideration of any director candidates recommended by security holders. To date, no security holders have made any such recommendations.

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth information concerning the total compensation paid or accrued by us during the fiscal years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 to (i) all individuals that served as our principal executive officer or acted in a similar capacity for us at any time during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015; (ii) our two most highly compensated executive officers other than the principal executive officer who were serving as executive officers at the end of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015; and (iii) up to two additional individuals who received annual compensation during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 in excess of $100,000 and who were not serving as executive officers of at the end of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.

Summary Compensation Table

Name

Non-Equity

Nonqualified

and

Stock

Option

Incentive Plan

Deferred

All Other

principal

Salary

Bonus

Awards

Compensation

Total

position

Year

($)

Earnings ($)

($)

Frank Terzo

President, Secretary, Treasurer (1)

2015

43,972

43.972

2014

67,334

67.334

(1)	As of February 27, 2014, Mr. Terzo was appointed as our sole officer and director.

Employment/Consulting Agreements

On May 15, 2014, we entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Terzo, pursuant to which we agreed to pay Mr. Terzo a monthly fee of $6,500 for his services to us as our Chief Executive Officer. This agreement has an effective date of March 1, 2014 and ends on February 28, 2015 (the “Initial Term”). The agreement may be renewed thereafter by mutual consent of the parties. If the agreement is terminated by us for any reason before the end of the Initial Term, we will be required to pay Mr. Terzo in full all unpaid compensation to the end of the Initial Term whether accrued or not yet accrued. We will reimburse Mr. Terzo for all reasonable pre-approved out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Mr. Terzo in connection with his role as our Chief Executive Officer. This agreement with Mr. Terzo has been extended on a month to month basis.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The table below summarizes all unexercised options, stock that has not vested, and equity incentive plan awards for each named executive officer as of June 30, 2015.


		Option Awards						Stock Awards
Name		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Option (#) Exercisable	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)	Option Exercise Price ($)	Option Expiration Date	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)
Frank Terzo (1)		—	—	—	—	—	—		—	—	—
(1)	As of February 27, 2014, Mr. Terzo was appointed as our sole officer and director.

Compensation of Directors

Our sole director is not compensated by us for acting as such. There are no arrangements pursuant to which our sole director is or will be compensated in the future for any services provided as a director.

We do not have any agreements for compensating our directors for their services in their capacity as directors, although such directors are expected in the future to receive stock options to purchase shares of our common stock as awarded by our board of directors.

The table below summarizes all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our sole director for all services rendered in all capacities to us through June 30, 2015.

Director Compensation


Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Change in Pension Value and Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Frank Terzo	112,466	0	0	0	0	0	112,466

At this time, we have not entered into any employment agreements with our sole officer and director. If there is sufficient cash flow available from our future operations, we may enter into employment agreements with our sole officer and director or future key staff members.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information on the ownership of the Company’s voting securities by officers, directors and major shareholders as well as those who own beneficially more than five percent of the Company’s common stock as of the date of this report:

Unless otherwise indicated in the following table, the address for each person named in the table is c/o Urban Hydroponics, Inc., c/o CKR Law LLP, 1330 Avenue of the Americas, 14^th Floor, New York, NY 10019.

Title of Class: Common Stock

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership ⁽¹⁾		Percentage of Class ⁽²⁾

Frank Terzo		0		0.0	%

All directors and executive officers as a group (1 person)		0		0.0	%

Humberto Bravo		22,000,000		63.2	%
3707 Fifth Ave., #351 San Diego, CA 92103

¹	Except as otherwise indicated, the persons named in this table have sole voting, investment and dispositive power with respect to all shares of common stock listed, which includes shares of common stock that such persons have the right to acquire within 60 days from September 30, 2015.

²	Percentages are based upon 34,800,000 shares of our common stock outstanding as of September 30, 2015.

Loan from a related party is from Mr. Shafiq Nazerali, principal of Valor. As of June 30, 2015 the loan balance is $56,162. All funds provided to the Company by him are unsecured and he has agreed to forego any penalties or interest should the Company be unable to repay any of the funds provided.

On May 15, 2014, The Company entered into a Consulting Agreement with Frank Terzo and Accelerated Growth Ventures (the “Consultant”). Whereas the “Consultant” has provided Chief Executive Officer, President, Treasurer and Secretary services to the Company since February 27, 2014 (March 1, 2014 the “Effective Date”) the Company agrees to a minimum term for his services of 12 months from the Effective Date with compensation of $6,500 (six thousand, five hundred dollars) per month. The Company will reimburse the “consultant” for all reasonable pre-approved out of pocket expenses in connection with the services rendered under this agreement. The Company may terminate the “consultant” on five days prior written notice if he is unable to perform any of the duties covered by this Agreement. The “Consultant” may terminate this Agreement on thirty days prior written notice. As of June 30, 2015, the Company had paid Mr. Terzo $112,466 under this agreement.

On May 1, 2014, the Company entered into a Consulting and Finder’s Fee Agreement with ZMAX Capital Corp., a Florida Corporation (’ZMAX), whose President and Director is Shafiq Nazerali. ZMAX is also a shareholder of this Company. Pursuant to this agreement, the Company agreed to pay ZMAX a $50,000 (fifty thousand dollars) fee in connection with the successful closing of the Company’s Notes Offering. As of June 30, 2015, the Company had paid ZMAX $50,000 under this agreement.

Effective June 1, 2014, the Company entered into a Consulting Services Agreement with ZMAX pursuant to which the Company agreed to pay ZMAX a monthly fee of $10,000 for a period of 12 months for certain management, business development, corporate finance and other related services to be provided to the Company by ZMAX. As of June 30, 2015, the Company had paid ZMAX $87,948 under this agreement.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed to us by our principal accountant for services rendered during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, is set forth in the table below:


Fee Category	Fiscal year ended June 30, 2015		Fiscal year ended June 30, 2014

Audit fees (1)		$17, 800	$	17,800
Audit-related fees (2)		0		0
Tax fees (3)		0		0
All other fees (4)		0		0
Total fees		$17, 800	$	17,800

(1) Audit fees consist of fees incurred for professional services rendered for the audit of our financial statements, for reviews of our interim financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and for services that are normally provided in connection with statutory or regulatory filings or engagements.

(2) Audit-related fees consist of fees billed for professional services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements, but are not reported under “Audit fees.”

(3) Tax fees consist of fees billed for professional services relating to tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice.

(4) All other fees consist of fees billed for all other services.

Audit Committee’s Pre-Approval Practice

Prior to our engagement of our independent auditor, such engagement was approved by our Board of Directors. The services provided under this engagement may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Pre-approval is generally provided for up to one year and any pre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services and is generally subject to a specific budget. Pursuant our requirements, the independent auditors and management are required to report to our Board of Directors at least quarterly regarding the extent of services provided by the independent auditors in accordance with this pre-approval, and the fees for the services performed to date. Our Board of Directors may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis. All audit-related fees, tax fees and other fees incurred by us for the year ended June 30, 2015, were approved by our Board of Directors.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Financial Statements

See Index to Financial Statements immediately following the signature page of this report.

Financial Statement Schedules

All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or notes thereto.

Exhibits

The following exhibits are filed or furnished with or incorporated by reference in this report.

In reviewing the agreements included or incorporated by reference as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K, please remember that, while these exhibits constitute public disclosure under the federal securities laws, they are included to provide you with information regarding their terms and are not intended to provide any other factual or disclosure information about the Company or the other parties to the agreements. The agreements may contain representations and warranties by each of the parties to the applicable agreement. These representations and warranties have been made solely for the benefit of the parties to the applicable agreement and:

·	should not in all instances be treated as categorical statements of fact, but rather as a way of allocating the risk to one of the parties if those statements prove to be inaccurate;

·	have been qualified by disclosures that were made to the other party in connection with the negotiation of the applicable agreement, which disclosures are not necessarily reflected in the agreement;

·	may apply standards of materiality in a way that is different from what may be viewed as material to you or other investors; and

·	were made only as of the date of the applicable agreement or such other date or dates as may be specified in the agreement and are subject to more recent developments.

Accordingly, these representations and warranties may not describe the actual state of affairs as of the date they were made or at any other time. Additional information about the Company may be found elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the Company’s other public filings, which are available without charge through the SEC’s website at http://www.sec.gov.


Exhibit Number	SEC Report Reference No.	Description of Exhibit
3.1	3.01	Articles of Incorporation (1)
3.2	3.1	Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (2)
3.3	3.2	Bylaws (1)
4.1	4.1	Form of 10% Secured Convertible Promissory Note of the Registrant (3)
4.2	4.2	Bridge Loan Promissory Note in favor of the Registrant dated May 21, 2014 (3)
10.1	10.1	Waiver and Release Agreement Dated June 30, 2013 by and between the Registrant and Jorge Alberto Almarez (4)
10.2	10.2	Waiver and Release Agreement Dated June 30, 2013 by and between the Registrant and Roca Cantera Y Marmol Canteras Acabados Finos (4)
10.3	10.1	Form of 10% Note Securities Purchase Agreement of the Registrant (3)
10.4	10.2	Bridge Loan Agreement by and among the Registrant and the other parties thereto dated May 21, 2014 (3)
10.5	10.3	Form of General Security Agreement by and among Registrant and the other parties thereto dated as of May 21, 2014 (3)
10.6	10.6	Consulting and Finder’s Fee Agreement dated May 1, 2014 by and between the Registrant and ZMAX Capital Corp. (4)
10.7	10.7	Consulting Agreement dated May 15, 2014 by and between the Registrant, Frank Terzo and Accelerated Growth Ventures, Inc. (4)
10.8	10.8	Consulting Services Agreement dated June 1, 2014 by and between the Registrant and ZMAX Capital Corp. (4)
10.9	*	Professional Relations and Consulting Agreement dated July 6, 2015 by and between the Registrant and Acorn Management Partners, LLC
10.10	*	Investor Relations Service Agreement dated September 4, 2015 by and between the Registrant and Hilton Advisory Group, Inc.
31.1/31.2	*	Certification of Principal Executive and Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
32.1/32.2	*	Certifications of Chief Executive and Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002*
21.1	*	List of Subsidiaries
101.INS*		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document
101.PRE*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

* Filed herewith.

(1)

Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, filed with the SEC (SEC File Number 333-171307) on December 21, 2010.

(2)

Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC (SEC File Number 000-54118) on July 9, 2014.

(3)

Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC (SEC File Number 000-54118) on May 28, 2014.

(4)

Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC (SEC File Number 000-54118) on October 14, 2014.

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		URBAN HYDROPONICS, INC.

October 13, 2015		By: /s/ Frank Terzo
		Frank Terzo, President, Treasurer and Secretary
		(Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


Signature	Title	Date

/s/ Frank Terzo	Director	October 13, 2015
Frank Terzo

URBAN HYDROPONICS, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

Financial Statements

June 30, 2014

TABLE OF CONTENTS


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F–2
Balance Sheets	F–3
Statements of Operations	F–4
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity	F–5
Statements of Cash Flows	F–6
Notes to the Financial Statements	F–7

F-1

GEORGE STEWART, CPA

316 17^TH AVENUE SOUTH

SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98144

(206) 328-8554 FAX(206) 328-0383

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors

Urban Hydroponics Inc.

I have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Urban Hydroponics Inc. (A Development Stage Company) as of June 30, 2015 and 2014, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audit.

I conducted my audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audit provides a reasonable basis for my opinion.

In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Urban Hydroponics Inc., (A Development Stage Company) as of June 30, 2015 and 2014, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note # 3 to the financial statements, the Company has had no operations and has no established source of revenue. This raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plan in regard to these matters is also described in Note # 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/S/ George Stewart

Seattle, Washington

October 5, 2015

F-2

Urban Hydroponics, Inc. (formerly Placer Del Mar, Ltd.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Balance Sheets


	(Unaudited)
	Year Ended			Year Ended
	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014

ASSETS

CURRENT ASSETS

Cash and cash equivalents	$	45,115		$	77
Bridge Loans		1,211,000			520,000
Bridge loans accrued interest		100,325			5,379
Total current assets		1,356,440			525,456

LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable	$	265,904		$	267,368
Secured loans		1,935,000			620,000
Secured loans accrued interest		140,891			6,422
Loan from related party		56,162			56,162
Total current liabilities		2,397,957			949,952

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 authorized; none issued at June 30, 2015 and 2014 respectively.		—			—
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 300,000,000 shares authorized; 34,800,000 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2015 and 34,400,000 at June 30, 2014 respectively.		34,800			34,400
Additional paid-in capital		221,400			9,800
Deficit accumulated during development stage		(1,297,717	)		(467,496	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY		(1,041,517	)		(423,296	)

TOTAL LIABILITITES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	1,356,440		$	526,656

See Notes to Financial Statements

F-3

Urban Hydroponics, Inc. (formerly Placer Del Mar, Ltd.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Operations


	Year Ended			Year Ended
	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014

REVENUES
Revenues	—			—
TOTAL REVENUES	$	—		$	—

OPERATING COSTS
Administrative expenses		788,224			292,185
TOTAL OPERATING COSTS	$	788,224		$	292,185
OTHER EXPENSE
Interest expense		136,943			6,422
TOTAL OTHER EXPENSE		136,943			6,422

TOTAL EXPENSE	$	925,167		$	298,607

NET ORDINARY INCOME (LOSS)		(925,167	)		(298,607	)
OTHER INCOME/EXPENSE
Other income
Interest income		94,946			5,379
TOTAL OTHER INCOME/EXPENSE		94,946			5,379

NET INCOME(LOSS)	$	(830,221	)	$	(293,228	)

BASIC AND DILUTED EARNINGS (LOSS)
PER SHARE	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.00	)

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING		34,800,000			34,400,000

See Notes to Financial Statements

F-4

Urban Hydroponics, Inc. (formerly Placer Del Mar, Ltd.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity


								Deficit
								Accumulated
			Common					During
	Common Stock		Stock Amount		Additional Paid-in Capital			Development Stage			Total
Balance May 13, 2005		—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—
Stock issued for cash on May 20, 2005									—
at $0.001 per share		20,000,000		20,000		(10,000	)		—			10,000
Stock issued for cash on June 14, 2005
at $0.001 per share		8,400,000		8,400		(4,200	)		—			4,200
Stock issued for cash on June 30, 2005
at $0.001 per share		4,000,000		4,000		16,000			—			20,000
Net loss June 30, 2005									(3,500	)		(3,500	)
Balance June 30 2005		1,620,000	$	32,400	$	1,800		$	(3,500	)	$	30,700
Stock issued for services on May 22, 2006
at $0.01 per share		2,000,000		2,000		8,000			—			10,000
Net loss June 30, 2006									(25,885	)		(25,885	)
Balance, June 30, 2006		3,620,000		34,400		9,800			(29,385	)		14,815
Net loss June 30, 2007									(29,105	)		(29,105	)
Balance June 30, 2007		3,620,000		34,400		9,800			(58,490	)		(14,290	)
Net loss June 30, 2008									(18,023	)		(18,023	)
Balance June 30, 2008		3,620,000		34,400		9,800			(76,513	)		(32,313	)
Net loss June 30, 2009									(24,649	)		(24,649	)
Balance June 30, 2009		3,620,000		34,400		9,800			(101,162	)		(56,962	)
Net Loss June 30, 2010									(10,646	)		(10,646	)
Balance June 30, 2010		3,620,000		34,400		9,800			(111,808	)		(67,608	)
Net profit June 30, 2011									100,100			100,100
Balance June 30, 2011		3,620,000		34,400		9,800			(11,708	)		32,492
Net loss June 30, 2012									(106,168	)		(106,168	)
Balance June 30, 2012		3,620,000		34,400		9,800			(117,876	)		(73,676	)
Net loss June 30, 2013									(57,591	)		(57,591	)
Balance June 30, 2013		3,620,000		34,400		9,800			(175,467	)		(131,267	)
Net loss June 30, 2014									(292,029	)		(292,029	)
Balance June 30, 2014		34,400,000		34,400		9,800			(467,496	)		(423,296	)
Stock issued for services on April 19, 2015		400,000		400		211,600						212,000
Net loss June 30,2015									(830,221	)		(830,221	)
Balance June 30, 2015		34,800,000		34,800		221,400			(1,297,717	)		(1,041,517	)

See Notes to Financial Statements

F-5

Urban Hydroponics, Inc. (formerly Placer Del Mar, Ltd.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Cash Flows

	Year Ended			Year Ended
	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income(loss)	$	(830,221	)	$	(293,228	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Bridge Loans		(691,000	)		(520,000	)
(Accrued Interest bridge loans)		(94,949	)		(5,379	)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		—			—
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(264	)		166,329
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(1,616,434	)		(652,278	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from loan from related party		—			25,934
Proceeds of loan from shareholder		—			—
Proceeds from secured promissory notes		1,315,000			620,000
Accrued interest from secured promissory notes		134,472			6,421
Issuance of common stock		212,000			—
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES		1,661,472			652,355

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH		45,038			77
CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		77			—
CASH AT END OF PERIOD	$	45,115		$	77

NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCIAL ACTIVITIES
Increase in mining rights license and long -term liabilities		—			—

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION

Cash paid during year for :
Interest	$	—		$	—

Income Taxes	$	—		$	—

See Notes to Financial Statements

F-6

Urban Hydroponics, Inc. (formerly Placer Del Mar, Ltd.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

June 30, 2015

NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Urban Hydroponics, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on May 13, 2005 as Placer Del Mar, Ltd. The Company’s year-end is June 30. The Company is “A Development Stage Company” as defined by Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 918, Development Stage Entities. The Company obtained a mineral rights option agreement on June 3, 2005. The Company’s inception date was May, 13^th 2005. The Company began operations in September of 2006 and had ongoing operations and spent $366,786 to confirm viable minerals within the claim. These funds were expensed due to PCAOB and GAAP rules.

On December 8, 2010 the Company entered into a Mineral Extraction Agreement with Roca Cantera Y Marmol, Canteras Acabados Finos related to the extraction of only Mexican Shellstone-Limestone (“Conchuela”) on the property. As of June 30, 2013 the Company had reported revenue of $197,927 from the Conchuela extraction.

In June, 2013, our Board of Directors determined that the Company should cease its mining exploration activities and to refocus our business objectives to seeking, investigating and, if such investigation warrants, engaging in a business combination with a private entity whose business presents an opportunity for our shareholders. Accordingly, as of June 30, 2013, both the Mineral Rights Revenue Sharing Agreement with Mr. Almarez and the Mineral Extraction Agreement with Roca Cantera Y Marmol, Canteras Acabados Finos were terminated by the parties, with each party waiving, and releasing the other party from, any liabilities or obligations, past or future, under those agreements.

We are no longer engaged in the business of mining and mineral exploration. We currently hold no mineral exploration or mining rights and do not currently intend to acquire any. We intend to seek, investigate and, if such investigation warrants, engage in a business combination with a private entity whose business presents an opportunity for our shareholders. Our objectives discussed below are extremely general and are not intended to restrict discretion of our Board of Directors to search for and enter into potential business opportunities or to reject any such opportunities.

NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Accounting

The Company’s financial statements are prepared using the accrual method of accounting.

Basic Earnings (loss) per Share

The Company computes net income (loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings per Share. ASC 260 specifies the computation, presentation and disclosure requirements for earnings (loss) per share for entities with publicly held common stock. The Company has adopted the provisions of ASC 260 effective May 13, 2005 (inception).

Basic net earnings (loss) per share amounts are computed by dividing the net earnings (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per share are the same as basic earnings (loss) per share due to the lack of dilutive items in the Company.

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

F-7

Urban Hydroponics, Inc. (formerly Placer Del Mar, Ltd.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

June 30, 2015

NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. In accordance with FASB 16 all adjustments are normal and recurring.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are provided in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes. A deferred tax asset or liability is recorded for all temporary differences between financial and tax reporting and net operating loss carry forwards. Deferred tax expense (benefit) results from the net change during the year of deferred tax assets and liabilities.

Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-11, which is included in the Codification under ASC 815. This update clarifies the type of embedded credit derivative that is exempt from embedded derivative bifurcation requirements. Only an embedded credit derivative that is related to the subordination of one financial instrument to another qualifies for the exemption. This guidance became effective for the Company’s interim and annual reporting periods beginning January 1, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09, which is included in the Codification under ASC 855, Subsequent Events (“ASC 855”). This update removes the requirement for an SEC filer to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated and became effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning January 1, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, which is included in the Codification under ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”). This update requires the disclosure of transfers between the observable input categories and activity in the unobservable input category for fair value measurements. The guidance also requires disclosures about the inputs and valuation techniques used to measure fair value and became effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning January 1, 2010. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In May 2009, the FASB issued ASC No. 855 “Subsequent Events”. ASC No. 855 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. ASC No. 855 sets forth (1) The period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements, (2) The circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and (3) The disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. ASC No. 855 was effective for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009.

F-8

Urban Hydroponics, Inc. (formerly Placer Del Mar, Ltd.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

June 30, 2015

NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

The Company has implemented all new accounting pronouncements that are in effect and that may impact its financial statements and does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 3. GOING CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. The Company reported no revenue for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 respectively. The Company has generated net losses of $1,297,717 during the period from May 13, 2005 (inception) to June 30, 2015. This condition raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company will require additional funding for operations and this additional funding may be raised through debt or equity offerings. Management has yet to decide what type of offering the Company will use or how much capital the Company will attempt to obtain. There is no guarantee that the Company will be able to raise any capital through any type of offerings.

NOTE 4. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION

The Company neither owns nor leases any real or personal property. The officer/director of the Company is involved in other businesses. This could create a conflict between the Company and his other business interests. The Company has not formulated a policy for the resolution of such a conflict should one arise.

Loan from a related party is from Mr. Shafiq Nazerali. Mr. Nazerali is the principal of Valor Invest Ltd. (“Valor”). As of June 30, 2015 the loan balance is $56,162. All funds provided to the Company by him are unsecured and he has agreed to forego any penalties or interest should the Company be unable to repay any of the funds provided.

NOTE 5. INCOME TAXES

	As of June 30, 2015

Deferred tax assets:
Net operating tax carryforward	$	1,297,717
Tax rate		34	%
Gross deferred tax assets		441,224
Valuation allowance		(441,224	)

Net deferred tax assets	$	-0-

Realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon sufficient future taxable income during the period that deductible temporary differences and carryforwards are expected to be available to reduce taxable income. As the achievement of required future taxable income is uncertain, the Company recorded a valuation allowance.

NOTE 6. NET OPERATING LOSSES

As of June 30, 2015, the Company has a net operating loss of $1,297,717. Net operating loss expires twenty years from the date the loss was incurred.

F-9

Urban Hydroponics, Inc. (formerly Placer Del Mar, Ltd.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

June 30, 2015

NOTE 7. STOCK TRANSACTIONS

On May 20, 2005, the Company issued 20,000,000 shares of common stock for cash at $0.01 per share (post-split basis).

On June 14, 2005, the Company issued 8,400,000 shares of common stock for cash at $0.01 per share (post-split basis).

On June 30, 2005, the Company issued 4,000,000 shares of common stock for cash at $0.10 per share (post-split basis).

On May 22, 2006, the Company issued 2,000,000 shares of common stock for services at $0.10 per share (post-split basis).

On May 28, 2014, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a 20-for-1 forward stock split on its common stock outstanding in the form of a dividend, with a Record Date of June 19, 2014. This stock split in the form of a dividend entitled each common stock shareholder as of the Record Date to receive nineteen (19) additional shares of common stock for each one (1) share owned. Additional shares issued as a result of the stock split were distributed on the Payment Date. Shareholders did not need to exchange existing stock certificates and received a new certificate reflecting the newly issued shares.

On May 31, 2014, our Majority Stockholder approved an amendment (the “2012 Plan Amendment”) to our 2012 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2012 Plan”). Pursuant to the 2012 Plan Amendment, the number of shares of our common stock reserved for issuance under the 2012 Plan was reduced to 380,000 from 7,000,000 shares. This reduction was adopted in view of our 20 for 1 forward stock split in the form of a dividend, which, taking into account the automatic adjustment provisions for stock dividends set forth in Section 14(a)(iii) of the 2012 Plan, resulted in 7,600,000 shares of our common stock being available for grant under the 2012 Plan following effectiveness of the forward stock split.

On February 15, 2015, the Company issued 400,000 shares (post-split basis to the designee of a former service provider in exchange for settlement in full of an outstanding balance of $211,138.07 ($212,000 rounded up) for services provided by such service provider.

As of June 30, 2015 the Company had 34,800, 000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities

Between May 21, 2104 and August 5, 2015 held multiple closings and sold an aggregate of $1,970,000 in principle amount of its 10% Secured Convertible Promissory Notes (the “Investor Notes”) to twenty three (23) investors (the “Investors”). The Investor Notes were offered and sold in a private placement (the “Notes Offering”) to a limited number of non-U.S. persons pursuant to the exemptions from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), provided by Section 4(a)(2) of, and Regulation S under, the Securities Act. There may be additional closings on the Investor Notes, up to an aggregate principal amount of $2,000,000. The Company has paid a finder fee of $50,000 for introducing the Investors to the Company.

The Company has used $1,226,000 of the net proceeds derived from its issuance of the Investor Notes to provide bridge financing (“Bridge Financing”) to 0838373 B.C. Ltd., a British Columbia corporation (a “Numbered Company”), Urban Cultivator Inc. a British Columbia Corporation (“UC”) BC Northern Lights Enterprises Ltd., a British Columbia corporation (“BCNL”), and W3 Metal Inc., a British Columbia corporation (“W3,” and together with Numbered Company, UC and BCNL, the “Borrowers”) for working capital purposes. The Bridge Financing is evidenced by a Secured Bridge Loan Promissory Note from the Borrowers to the Company (the “Bridge Notes”).

F-10

Urban Hydroponics, Inc. (formerly Placer Del Mar, Ltd.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

June 30, 2015

NOTE 7. STOCK TRANSACTIONS (continued)

On May 5, 2014, Valor, on behalf of the Company, signed a non-binding term sheet (the “Term Sheet”) with the Borrowers regarding a possible business combination (the “Merger”) involving these companies. The Borrowers are private companies engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling commercial and residential hydroponic growing systems. On October 3, 2014, the Company signed a Binding Letter of Intent (LOI), as amended on October 31, 2014 and February 23, 2015, to revise the terms of the proposed Merger with the Borrowers. This LOI replaced and superseded the Term Sheet and Valor was not a party to the LOI. Pursuant to the terms of the LOI, it is contemplated that a newly-formed, wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company will merge with and into the Borrower, as a result of which the Company will acquire all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of the Borrowers and the Borrowers will become wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company.

Although the LOI is binding, there can be no assurance that the Merger will take place. The Bridge Financing to the Borrowers was completed as contemplated by the Term Sheet and the LOI.

The Investor Notes bear interest at a rate of 10% per annum and are for a term of eight (8) months (“Maturity”). The Investor Notes are automatically convertible, subject to a 4.99% conversion blocker, upon closing of the Merger into units (the “Units”), at a conversion price of $0.30 per Unit. Each Unit consists of one (1) share of the Company’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share (the “Common Stock”), and a warrant to purchase one (1) share of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.35 per share for two (2) years. The shares of Common Stock that would be issued as a result of conversion of the Investor Notes (and upon exercise of the related warrants) carry certain registration rights. Upon the closing of the Merger, the Company shall issue to each of the Investors warrants (the “Bridge Warrants”) to purchase a number of shares of Common Stock equal to one hundred percent (100%) of the number of shares of Common Stock comprising the Units, exercisable at a price of $0.35 per share, exercisable for two (2) years from the closing of the Merger. The Bridge Warrants will have weighted average anti-dilution protection. If the Merger does not close, the Investor Notes must be repaid.

The Investor Notes and the Bridge Notes are secured by all of the assets of the Borrowers. This security interest is subordinated to that of a certain bank providing an existing credit facility to the Borrowers. The Bridge Notes are for a term of eight (8) months from the initial closing of the Bridge Financing, and bears interest at the rate of 10% per annum. All obligations under the Bridge Notes will be deemed repaid in full and canceled upon the closing of the Merger. If the Merger does not close, the Bridge Notes must be repaid.

The Investor Notes contain customary events of default and include a default by the Borrowers under the Bridge Note. If the Company defaults under the Investor Notes, the full principal amount of the Investor Notes will, at the Investor’s option, become immediately due and payable in cash. In addition, upon an event of default, the Investor Notes will begin to bear interest at a rate of 12% per annum, or such lower maximum amount of interest permitted to be charged under applicable law.

A default by Borrowers under the Bridge Notes, including but not limited to the failure to repay the Bridge Notes at Maturity if the Merger doesn’t close, will cause the full principal amount of the Bridge Notes, at the Company’s option, to become immediately due and payable in cash. In addition, upon an event of default, the Bridge Notes will begin to bear interest at a rate of 12% per annum, or such lower maximum amount of interest permitted to be charged under applicable law, which interest rate will continue until all defaults are cured.

Because of the delay in the closing of the Merger, nineteen (19) of the Investor Notes in the aggregate principle amount of $970,000 have reached their maturity dates (some of which were previously extended) and are now due and payable in full along with accrued and unpaid interest. Because these Investor Notes are now in default, the interest rate has begun to accrue at an annual rate of 12% from the date of the default. The company is in the process of asking the Investors to agree to extend the maturity date on these Investor Notes to a date after the currently after the currently projected closing date of the Merger (October 31, 3015), but there can be no assurance that any of the Investors will agree to such an extension. If one or more of the Investors demands payment of the principal and accrued interest on his defaulted Investor Note, the Company might not be able to meet such demand.

F-11

Urban Hydroponics, Inc. (formerly Placer Del Mar, Ltd.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

June 30, 2015

Because of the delay in the closing of the proposed Merger, the Company’s loans to the Borrowers in the aggregate amount of $1,000,000 became due and payable to the Company between January 20, 2015 and February 4, 2015. Under the terms of the LOI amendment dated February 23, 2015, the Company agreed to extend the maturity dates on the Bridge Notes relating to these loans to May 31, 2015. Although these loans are now due and payable and are in default, the Company expects to further amend the LOI to further extend the maturity dates on the Bridge Notes relating to these loans to a date after the expected closing date of the Merger. Because $1,000,000 of the loans to the Borrowers are now in default, the Company may be obligated to exercise its rights under the General Security Agreement with the Borrowers if it is not able to extend the maturity dates on the Investor Notes that are now in default.

In addition to the Notes Offering, the Company intends to engage in an additional private placement of the Units for at least an additional $1,000,000 in gross proceeds to the Company (the “Subsequent Offering”), for post- merger working capital. The closing of the Subsequent Offering and the closing of the Merger is each a condition precedent to the other.

NOTE 8. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

The stockholders’ equity section of the Company contains the following classes of capital stock as of June 30, 2014:

Preferred stock, $ 0.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued.

Common stock, $ 0.001 par value: 300,000,000 shares authorized; 34,800,000 shares issued and outstanding.

NOTE 9. AMENDED PROMISSORY NOTES

Between May 21, 2014 and December 17, 2014, the Company issued $1,500,000 in aggregate principal amount of the Investor Notes (10% Convertible Secured Promissory Notes), all, with eight month maturities. These Investor Notes became due and payable under their original terms between January 20, 2015 and, most recently, August 16, 2015. Of this $1,500,000, Investor Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $530,000 have been amended to extend their maturity dates and are not yet due and payable under their extended maturity date terms. Investor Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $816,000 have been amended to extend their maturity dates but the amended maturity dates for these Investor Notes have been reached and these Investor Notes are now due and payable in full, along with accrued interest, and are in default. An additional $154,000 in principal amount of the Investor Notes have reached their maturity dates, have not had their maturity dates extended and are in default as well.

The Company is in the process of asking the Investors in the defaulted Investor Notes to agree to further extend the maturity dates on their Investor Notes to a date after the currently projected closing date of the Merger (October 31, 3015), but there can be no assurance that any of such Investors will agree to such an additional extension. If one or more of such Investors demands payment of the principal and accrued interest on his defaulted Investor Note, the Company might not be able to meet such demand.

F-12

Urban Hydroponics, Inc. (formerly Placer Del Mar, Ltd.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

June 30, 2015

NOTE 10. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company evaluated all events or transactions that occurred after June 30, 2015 up through date the Company issued these financial statements. During this period, the Company reports the following;

Although the LOI provides that the proposed Merger is expected to close on or before November 30, 2014, there has been a delay in the preparation of the audited financial statements of the Target Companies and it is now expected that the proposed Merger will close on or about October 31, 2015, although there can be no assurance that this will, in fact, happen.

F-13

Urban Hydroponics, Inc. 10-K