UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2013
	For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from __________ to __________

000-54521
Commission File Number

American Graphite Technologies Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	27-2841739
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

3651 Lindell Rd., Ste D#422, Las Vegas, NV	89103
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(702) 473-8227
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes [X ] No [ X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	[ ]	Accelerated filer	[ ]

Non-accelerated filer	[ ]	Smaller reporting company	[X]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [ ] No [ X ]

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY

PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court.

Yes [ ] No [ ]

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

8296,~~918~~083,~~374~~348 common shares outstanding as of ~~January~~November 2412, ~~2013~~2014 (Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.)

AMERICAN GRAPHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC

~~TABLE~~Table OFof ~~CONTENTS~~Contents

		Page
	PART I – Financial Information	5
Item 1.	Financial Statements	64
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	85
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	89
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	9
	PART II – Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	10
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	10
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	10
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	10
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	10
Item 5.	Other Information	10
Item 6.	Exhibits	11
	Signatures	12

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

REPORTED IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 210 8-03 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. Operating results for the ~~six~~three month period ended ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the fiscal year ending June 30, ~~2013~~2015. For further information refer to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in ~~the~~our ~~Company~~company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2013~~2014 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 1514, ~~2013~~2014.

	Page
Balance Sheets	F-1
Statements of Operations	F-2
Statements of Cash Flows	F-3
Notes to Financial Statements	F-4 to F-17

REPORTED IN UNITED STATES DOLLARS

	Page
Balance Sheets	F-1
Statements of Operations	F-2
Statements of Cash Flows	F-3
Notes to Financial Statements	F-4 to F-14

AMERICAN GRAPHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC. (An Exploration Stage Company) BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
	December 31, 2013			June 30, 2013
Assets
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash	$	257,832		$	116,588
Prepaid expenses		261,762			170,000
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		519,594			286,588
TOTAL ASSETS	$	519,594		$	286,588
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY(DEFICIT)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	14,292		$	8,806
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		14,292			8,806
Derivative warrant liabilities (Notes 2, 6)		1,213,456			-
TOTAL LIABILITIES		1,227,748			8,806
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY(DEFICIT)
Capital stock Authorized - 200,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value Issued and outstanding 82,918,374 and 78,359,486 shares of common stock, respectively as at December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2013		82,918			78,359
Stock Payable		-			85,000
Additional paid in capital		201,252			789,267
Accumulated deficit during the exploration stage		(992,324	)		(674,844	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY(DEFICIT)		(708,154	)		277,782
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY(DEFICIT)	$	519,594		$	286,588

AMERICAN GRAPHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC. BALANCE SHEETS UNAUDITED

	September 30, 2014 (Unaudited)			June 30, 2014 (audited)
Assets
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash	$	250,272		$	307,693
Prepaid expenses		336,494			336,494
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		586,766			644,187
TOTAL ASSETS	$	586,766		$	644,187

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY(DEFICIT)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	39,729		$	32,795
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		39,729			32,795

Derivative warrant liabilities (Notes 2, 6)		557,890			554,828

TOTAL LIABILITIES		597,619			587,623

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY(DEFICIT)
Capital stock Authorized - 200,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value Issued and outstanding 96,083,348 shares of common stock as at September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014		96,083			96,083
Additional paid in capital		1,357,448			1,357,448
Accumulated deficit		(1,464,384	)		(1,396,967	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY(DEFICIT)		(10,853	)		56,564
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY(DEFICIT)	$	586,766		$	644,187

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-1

AMERICAN GRAPHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC. (An Exploration Stage Company) STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)
													Cumulative results from Inception,
													June 1, 2010
	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended						Through
	December 31, 2013			December 31, 2012			December 31, 2013			December 31, 2012			December 31, 2013
REVENUE	$	-		$	-		$			$	-		$	-
OPERATING EXPENSES
Exploration expenses		-			-			-			-			24,468
Research and development expense		44,832			-			44,832			-			44,832
Office and general		39,072			17,913			83,511			35,833			187,564
Stock based compensation		-			46,800			42,000			78,000			273,450
Management fees		25,400			12,500			47,900			20,000			107,900
Consulting Fees		32,318			28,468			99,326			94,683			243,573
Professional fees		15,788			10,002			29,910			24,859			106,659
OPERATING LOSS		(157,410	)		(115,683	)		(347,479	)		(253,375	)		(988,446	)
OTHER EXPENSE
Interest Expense		-			-						(766	)		(877	)
Change in the fair value of warrant liability		32,898			-			29,999			-			29,999
NET LOSS	$	(124,512	)	$	(115,683	)	$	(317,480	)	$	(254,141	)	$	(959,324	)
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING- BASIC		82,918,374			78,218,750			82,668,374			77,934,273

AMERICAN GRAPHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC.

~~The~~STATEMENTS OF ~~accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.~~ OPERATIONS

UNAUDITED

	Three Month Ended
	September 30,			September 30,
	2014			2013

REVENUE	$	-		$	-

OPERATING EXPENSES
Office and general		2,040			44,439
Stock based compensation		-			42,000
Management fees		37,500			22,500
Consulting fees		12,714			67,008
Professional fees		12,101			14,122
OPERATING LOSS		(64,355	)		(190,069	)


OTHER EXPENSE
Change in the fair value of warranty liability		(3,062	)		(2,899	)

NET LOSS	$	(67,417	)	$	(192,968	)

NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE - BASIC	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING- BASIC		96,083,348			79,740,330

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-2

AMERICAN GRAPHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC. (An Exploration Stage Company) STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

AMERICAN GRAPHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC. STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS UNAUDITED


	Three Month ended September 30,
	2014			2013
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(67,417	)	$	(192,968	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by
Stock-based compensation		-			42,000
Change in the fair value of warrant liability		3,062			2,899
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities		934			31,636
Increase in accounts payable – related party		6,000
Increase in prepaid expenses		-			(2,335	)
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(57,421	)		(118,768	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from sale of common stock		-			533,000
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		-			533,000

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH		(57,412	)		414,232

CASH BEGINNING OF PERIOD		307,693			116,588

CASH, END OF PERIOD	$	250,272		$	530,820

Supplemental cash flow information and noncash financing activities:
Cash paid for interest	$	-		$	-
Cash paid for income taxes	$	-		$	-

Non-cash transactions
Stock based compensation	$	-		$	42,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

	Six months ended December 31,						Date of Inception (June 1, 2010) Through
	2013			2012			December 31, 2013
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(317,480	)	$	(254,141	)	$	(959,324	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities
Stock-based compensation		42,000			78,000			229,200
Shares issued per financing agreement		-			-			44,250
Change in the fair value of warrant liability		(29,999	)		-			(29,999	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Interest		-			(110	)		-
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities		4,370			14,667			13,176
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable – related party		1,115			(2,695	)		1,115
Increase (decrease) in prepaid expenses		(91,762	)		(10,425	)		(261,762	)
NET CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(391,756	)		(174,704	)		(963,344	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from sale of common stock		-			500,000			567,190
Proceeds from private placements, net		533,000			-			618,000
Proceeds from note payable		-			-			40,000
Repayment of note payable		-			(40,000	)		(40,000	)
Due to related party		-			-			35,986
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		533,000			460,000			1,221,176
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH		141,244			285,296			257,832
CASH BEGINNING OF PERIOD		116,588			30,042			-
CASH, END OF PERIOD	$	257,832		$	315,338		$	257,832
Supplemental cash flow information and noncash financing activities:
Cash paid for interest	$	-		$	876		$	877
Cash paid for income taxes	$	-		$	-		$	-
Non-cash transactions:
Stock based compensation	$	42,000		$	109,200		$	229,200
Shares issued per financing agreement		-			-			44,250
Forgiveness of shareholder loan		-			-			35,986
	$	42,000		$	109,200		$	309,436

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-3

AMERICAN GRAPHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

(~~UNAUDITED~~Unaudited)

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF ~~OPERATIONS~~OPERTIONS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

American Graphite Technologies Inc. (Formerly Green & Quality Home Life, Inc.) (the “Company”) is ina ~~the~~start-up ~~initial exploration~~enterprise ~~stage~~ and has incurred losses since inception totaling $~~959~~1,~~324~~464,384. The Company was incorporated on June 1, 2010 in the State of Nevada and established a fiscal year end at June 30. The Company is an exploration stage company as defined in FASB ASC 915 ~~involved in the exploration of existing mineral claims while concurrently developing certain grapheme related technologies~~ . We were originally organized to offer a portfolio of products and services to provide solutions for every family to automate domestic activities, making them less time consuming, easy to manage and leveraging the quality of life of every member of a family.

On May 23, 2012, Rick Walchuk, ~~the sole director and officer of American Graphite Technologies Inc,~~ acquired a total of 12,000,000 pre-forward split shares of the Company’s common stock from Fabio Alexandre Narita, the Company’s former director and officer, in a private transaction for an aggregate total of $350,000. The funds used for this share purchase were Mr. Walchuk’s personal funds. Mr. Walchuk’s 12,000,000 shares amounted to approximately 98% of the Company’s then currently issued and outstanding common stock. This transaction effected a change in control of the Company. With the change in control of the Company management determined to abandon the original business plan and has determined to enter into the business of exploration and development of mining projects and ~~the~~technology ~~development of technologies~~ related to graphite and grapheme. The Company currently ishas ~~funding~~no ~~two~~projects ~~developing technologies~~ and ~~will~~is bein ~~funding~~negotiations ~~the~~to ~~exploration~~acquire ofboth ~~acquired~~ mining ~~assets~~concessions and technology.

As part of the sale of his shares Mr. Narita agreed to extinguish all debts owed to him by the Company.

Also on May 23, 2012, Fabio Alexandre Narita resigned as a director, President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of ~~our~~the Company. In connection with the resignation of Mr. Narita, Rick Walchuk was appointed President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and a director. On December 13, 2013, the Board of ~~the~~ Directors of the Company appointed Con Evan Anast to the Board of Directors of the Company and elected him Secretary of the Company, having received the resignation of Mr. Walchuk as Company Secretary.

On June 11, 2012, our Board of Directors unanimously approved the following items:

1. an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to change our name to “American Graphite Technologies Inc.” (the “Name Change”);

2. an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation to increase our authorized capital from 75,000,000 to 200,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value (the “Increase in Authorized Capital”); and 3. an authorization to the Board of Directors to effect a forward split of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share at an exchange ratio of one hundred and twenty-five (125) for one (1) (the “Forward Split”) and to file such amendments as may be required with the requisite regulatory bodies to effect the Forward Split, so that every one (1) outstanding share of Common Stock before the Forward Split shall represent one hundred and twenty-five (125) shares of Common Stock after the Forward Split.

3. an authorization to the Board of Directors to effect a forward split of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share at an exchange ratio of one hundred and twenty-five (125) for one (1) (the “Forward Split”) and to file such amendments as may be required with the requisite regulatory bodies to effect the Forward Split, so that every one (1) outstanding share of Common Stock before the Forward Split shall represent one hundred and twenty-five (125) shares of Common Stock after the Forward Split.

On June 11, 2012, our majority stockholder executed written consent in lieu of a special meeting approving the Amendments.

Pursuant to these actions to be undertaken by the Company, Mr. Walchuk returned a total of 11,640,000 pre-forward split shares of common stock which were cancelled by the Company and returned to treasury.

Effective July 18, 2012, in accordance with approval from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), we changed our name from Green & Quality Home Life, Inc. to American Graphite Technologies Inc. and increased our authorized capital from 75,000,000 to 200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value of $0.001. In addition, our issued and outstanding shares of common stock increased from 619,500 to 77,437,500 shares of common stock, par value of $0.001 on the basis of a 125:1 forward split of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock. The forward split has been retroactively applied to all shares and per share figures in these financial statements.

F-4

AMERICAN GRAPHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

(~~UNAUDITED~~Unaudited)

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF ~~OPERATIONS~~OPERTIONS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION (continued)

Going ~~concern~~Concern

The Company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern. This contemplates the realization of assets and the liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. Currently, the Company does not have material assets aside from cash and prepaid expenses, nor does it have operations or a source of revenue sufficient to cover its operating costs. While there are sufficient funds to carry out the current operations of the Company, with no revenue generating operations there remains substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. As at ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $~~992~~1,~~324~~464,384. While we presently have cash on hand, the Company may be dependent upon the raising of additional capital through placement of our common stock in order to fully implement its business plan, or merge with an operating company. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in either situation in order to continue as a going concern.

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent on attaining profitable operations, accordingly there remains substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts, or amount and classification of liabilities that might cause results from this uncertainty.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Exploration stage

The Company's financial statements are presented as those of an Exploration stage enterprise. Activities during the Exploration stage primarily include implementation of the business plan, and obtaining additional debt and/or equity related financing.

Basis of Presentation

The financial statements present the balance sheets and statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows of the Company. These financial statements are presented in United States dollars and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers highly liquid financial instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

Preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures. Accordingly, actual results could differ from those estimates.

Warrants

We account for common stock warrants in accordance with applicable accounting guidance provided in ASC Topic 815 “Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity” (ASC Topic 815), as either derivative liabilities or as equity instruments depending on the specific terms of the warrant agreement. We classify derivative warrant liabilities on the balance sheet as a current liability, which is revalued at each balance sheet date, subsequent to the initial issuance. We use the Monte Carlo Options Lattice model, depending on the applicable terms of the warrant agreement, to value the derivative warrant liabilities. Changes in the fair value of the warrants are reflected in the statement of operations as “Change in the fair value of warrant liability.” See, Note 6 – financial agreement – (3) Securities Purchase Agreement, for a detailed description of our accounting for derivative warrant liabilities.

F-5

AMERICAN GRAPHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

(~~UNAUDITED~~Unaudited)

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with accounting guidance now codified as FASB ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes,” which requires that the Company recognize deferred tax liabilities and assets based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect in the years the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred income tax benefit (expense) results from the change in net deferred tax assets or deferred tax liabilities. A valuation allowance is recorded when it is more likely than not that some or all deferred tax assets will not be realized. Accounting guidance now codified as FASB ASC Topic 740-20, “Income Tax – Intra-period Tax Allocation,” clarifies the accounting for uncertainties in income taxes recognized in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 740-20 by prescribing guidance for the recognition, de-recognition and measurement in financial statements of income tax positions taken in previously filed tax returns or tax positions expected to be taken in tax returns, including a decision whether to file or not to file in a particular jurisdiction. FASB ASC Topic 740-20 requires that any liability created for unrecognized tax benefits is disclosed. The application of FASB ASC Topic 740-20 may also affect the tax bases of assets and liabilities and therefore may change or create deferred tax liabilities or assets.

Net Loss per Share

Basic loss per share includes no dilution and is computed by dividing loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock, common stock equivalents and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period.

The Company had the following potential common stock equivalents at ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014:

Warrants 4,~~308~~012,~~888~~500

Since the Company reflected a net loss in ~~fiscal~~the ~~year~~three ~~2013~~and nine month periods ended September 30, 2014 and ~~2012~~2013, respectively, the effect of considering any common stock equivalents, if outstanding, would have been anti-dilutive. A separate computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share is not presented.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Fair value estimates discussed herein are based upon certain market assumptions and pertinent information available to management as of ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013. The respective carrying value of certain on-balance-sheet financial instruments approximated their fair values. These financial instruments include cash, prepaid expenses and accounts payable. Fair values were assumed to approximate carrying values for cash and payables because they are short term in nature and their carrying amounts approximate fair values or they are payable on demand.

Level 1: The preferred inputs to valuation efforts are “quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities,” with the caveat that the reporting entity must have access to that market. Information at this level is based on direct observations of transactions involving the same assets and liabilities, not assumptions, and thus offers superior reliability. However, relatively few items, especially physical assets, actually trade in active markets.

Level 2: FASB acknowledged that active markets for identical assets and liabilities are relatively uncommon and, even when they do exist, they may be too thin to provide reliable information. To deal with this shortage of direct data, the board provided a second level of inputs that can be applied in three situations.

F-6

AMERICAN GRAPHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

(~~UNAUDITED~~Unaudited)

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

Level 3: If inputs from levels 1 and 2 are not available, FASB acknowledges that fair value measures of many assets and liabilities are less precise. The board describes Level 3 inputs as “unobservable,” and limits their use by saying they “shall be used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available.” This category allows “for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date”. Earlier in the standard, FASB explains that “observable inputs” are gathered from sources other than the reporting company and that they are expected to reflect assumptions made by market participants.

~~The~~As ~~following~~set ~~table~~forth ~~summarizes~~in ~~changes~~the Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 820-10-35-37 Fair Value in Financial Instruments (previously and herein referenced as “157”) to increase consistency, a fair value hierarchy was developed to rank the reliability of inputs that reflect assumptions, used as a basis for determining fair value. FAS 157 emphasizes that valuation techniques (income, market, and cost) used to measure the fair value of an asset or liability should maximize the ~~common~~use ~~stock~~of ~~warrants~~observable ~~measured~~inputs, that is, inputs that reflect the assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability developed based on amarket ~~recurring~~data ~~basis~~obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity. The FAS 157 accounting standard requires companies use actual market data, when available or models, when unavailable. A quoted price in an active market provides the most reliable evidence of fair value and shall be used to measure fair value whenever available, except when it might not represent fair value at the measurement date. When using ~~Level~~models, 3FAS ~~inputs~~157 ~~for~~provides guidance on appropriate valuation techniques and addresses the ~~three~~inherent ~~month~~valuation ~~period~~issue ~~ended~~of ~~December~~risk. 31A fair value measurement should include an adjustment for risk if market participants would include one in pricing the related asset or liability, ~~2013:~~even if the adjustment is difficult to determine.

Balance at June 30, 2013	$	-
Issuance of common stock warrants on September 9, 2013		1,243,455
Change in fair value of common stock warrant liability		(29,999)
Balance at December 31, 2013	$	1,213,456

We analyzed the derivative financial instruments, in accordance with EITF 07-05 and FAS 133. EITF 07-5 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2009, and interim periods within those fiscal years. It should be applied to outstanding instruments as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which it is adopted. Any adjustment would be recognized in the opening balance of retained earnings. The objective of EITF 07-5 is to provide guidance for determining whether an equity-linked financial instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock. This determination is needed for a scope exception under Paragraph 11(a) of FAS 133 which would enable a derivative instrument to be accounted for under the accrual method. The classification of a non-derivative instrument that falls within the scope of EITF 00-19 “Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments Indexed to, and Potentially Settled in, a Company’s Own Stock” also hinges on whether the instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock. A nonderivative instrument that is not indexed to an entity’s own stock cannot be classified as equity and must be accounted for as a liability. The EITF reached a consensus that would establish a two-step approach in determining whether an instrument or embedded feature is indexed to an entity’s own stock. First, the instrument's contingent exercise provisions, if any, must be evaluated, followed by an evaluation of the instrument's settlement provisions.

Derivative financial instruments should be recorded as liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet and measured at fair value. For purposes of this engagement and report, we utilized fair value as the basis for formulating our opinion which has been defined by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) as “the amount for which an asset (or liability) could be exchanged in a current transaction between knowledgeable, unrelated willing parties when neither party is acting under compulsion”. The FASB has provided guidance that its definition of fair value is consistent with the definition of fair market value in IRS Rev. Rule 59-60. In determining the fair value of the derivatives we assumed that the Company’s business would be conducted as a going concern. These derivative liabilities will need to be marked-to-market each quarter with the change in fair value recorded in the income statement. The FASB and IRS have provided guidance that its definition of fair value is consistent with the definition of fair market value in IRS Rev. Rule 59-60. Our opinion of Fair Value relied on a “value in use” or “going concern” premise. To properly apply this fair value standard, we gave consideration to the Holder’s intentions regarding whether or not the Securities purchased were to be held, sold, or abandoned. Our analysis also reflects assumptions that would be made by market participants if these market participants were to buy or sell each identified asset on an individual basis.

F-7

AMERICAN GRAPHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC.

Notes to the Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments (continued)

The Warrants issued with debt contain derivatives and require accounting under FAS 133 until exercised or expired. The derivative liability is marked to market each subsequent reporting period.

The following table summarizes the components of the derivate liabilities:

Warrant liability:	September 30, 2014		June 30, 2014		March 14, 2014		September 9, 2013
4,000,000 common stock purchase agreement dated September 9, 2013 *	$	-	$	-	$	1,482,326	$	1,243,455
3,750,000 common stock purchase agreement dated March 14, 2014		557,890		554,828		562,761		-
	$	557,890	$	554,828	$	2,045,087	$	1,243,455

*On March 14, 2014, the 3 subscribers, who were subscribers in an offering undertaken by the Company on September 9, 2013, along with 2 subscribers that did not elect to participate in this offering, executed a waiver and consent in regard to their rights under the September 9, 2013 offering (the “Original SPA”), whereby they waived the rights to receive any additional shares of common stock under the Original SPA agreements and the Company and the 5 investors agreed to a re-pricing of the warrants issued under the Original SPA from an exercise price of $0.30 per share to $0.0724 per share and that such reduction of the Exercise Price was deemed a reduction in connection with a Dilutive Issuance (as defined in the Warrants) and the number of Warrant Shares that may be purchased upon exercise of the Warrants increased. On March 14, 2014 through March 21, 2014, the Company received notices and executed cashless exercise from the subscribers under the Original SPA.

The following table summarizes the number of common shares indexed to the derivative financial instruments as of September 30 and June 30, 2014:

	Warrant Derivatives

4,000,000 common stock purchase agreement dated September 9, 2013		-
3,750,000 common stock purchase agreement dated March 14, 2014		4,012,500
		4,012,500

The following table summarizes the effects on our income (expense) associated with changes in the fair values of our derivative financial instruments by type of financing:

	Three months ended
	September 30,
		2014			2013
4,000,000 common stock purchase agreement dated September 9, 2013	$			$	(2,899	)
3,750,000 common stock purchase agreement dated March 14, 2014		(3,062	)		-
	$	(3,062	)	$	(2,899	)

F-8

AMERICAN GRAPHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC.

Notes to the Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Related Parties

Parties are considered to be related if one party has the ability, directly or indirectly, to control the other party or exercise significant influence over the other party in making financial and operating decisions. Parties are also considered to be related if they are subject to common control or common significant influence.

Stock-based Compensation

Stock-based compensation is accounted for using the Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees Topic of the FASB ASC, which establishes standards for the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the entity’s equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those equity instruments. The Company determines the value of stock issued at the date of grant. It also determines at the date of grant, the value of stock at fair market value or the value of services rendered (based on contract or otherwise) whichever is more readily determinable.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On June 10, 2014, The ~~Company~~Financial ~~has~~Accounting ~~evaluated~~Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, consolidation, which removes all incremental financial reporting requirements from GAAP for development stage entities, including the ~~recent~~removal ~~accounting~~of ~~pronouncements~~Topic 915 from the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. For the first annual period beginning after December 15, 2014, the presentation and ~~believes~~disclosure ~~that~~requirements ~~none~~in ofTopic ~~them~~915 will ~~have~~no alonger ~~material~~be ~~effect~~required onfor the public business entities. The revised consolidation standards are effective one year later, in annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. The Company’s ~~financial~~has ~~statements~~adopted the amendment as of fiscal year ended June 30, 2014.

There are several new accounting pronouncements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) which are not yet effective. Each of these pronouncements, as applicable, has been or will be adopted by the Company. As of September 30, 2014, none of these pronouncements is expected to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

NOTE 3 – TECHNOLOGY AGREEMENTS

(1) Technology Licensing Agreement

On December 3, 2012 we entered into and executed a non-exclusive technology License agreement for patent and trade secret technology in the field of graphene oxide or “Bucky” paper with Cheap Tubes, Inc. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, we acquired the rights to further develop, commercialize, market and distribute certain proprietary inventions and know-how related to the manufacturing processes for graphene products, including graphene paper, also known as Bucky Paper. We agreed to fund commercial development activities based on the payment schedules defined below and we received a license for the rights on a nonexclusive basis for marketing products and/or services. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, we agreed to provide the following payments to Cheap Tubes:

~~F-7~~A minimum of $250,000 over 18 months, payable as follows:

	-	$10,000 on the execution of the agreement; (paid)
	-	$40,000 per quarter on January 1, 2013, April 1, 2013, July 1, 2013 and October 1, 2013 and on January 1, 2014 and April 1, 2014. (paid)

F-9

AMERICAN GRAPHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

(~~UNAUDITED~~Unaudited)

NOTE 3 – TECHNOLOGY AGREEMENTS (continued)

(1) Technology Licensing Agreement cont’d:

A minimum of $250,000 over 18 months, payable as follows:

·	$10,000 on the execution of the agreement; (paid)
·	$40,000 per quarter on January 1, 2013, April 1, 2013, July 1, 2013 and October 1, 2013 and on January 1, 2014 and April 1, 2014.

Under the terms of the agreement, Cheap Tubes was to incorporate a new corporation (“Newco”) and assign all rights and obligations of the agreement with us as well as the patent agreement. The newly formed corporation would then become the party to this agreement. Until such time as Newco was formed all funds paid were to remain in an attorney escrow. Further, in order to have funds released from escrow the parties were to formulate and agree to a milestone schedule to be met by Cheap Tubes or Newco as the case may be. Each quarter the milestones from the prior quarter must be met as a pre-condition to the upcoming quarterly funding. Under the agreement the Company was granted a non-exclusive license to market and distribute Bucky Paper using the patents, trade secrets and knowhow (the “Proprietary Rights”) throughout the world. Newco or Cheap Tubes will manufacture the Bucky Paper products and we shall have no rights to sublicense the Proprietary Rights to a third party. As the agreement is non-exclusive, Cheap Tubes will also have the right to market and distribute Bucky Paper products, subject to our ongoing fees, as described below.

As consideration for funding, we will receive 40% of the Net Sales Revenue for Bucky Paper until the amount we have received equals our capital investment regardless of whether we, Cheap Tubes or CTI are the ultimate vendors on the sale. Thereafter, we will receive 30% of our capital investment until such time as we have received an amount equal to 20% of the capital invested, 25% for the next five years and 20% for the remaining five years, at which time all obligations to us from Cheap Tubes or CTI shall cease.

Under the agreement, any new opportunities presented to us or Mike Foley (the shareholder of Cheap Tubes), Cheap Tubes or CTI are to be negotiated and if agreement is reached then shall be formalized in a mutually acceptable definitive agreement; with no obligation upon either party to enter into an agreement should they not be able to negotiate mutually acceptable terms. However, it is the intent of the parties to work toward furthering the business of Cheap Tubes, CTI, our business and any new business that may present itself.

As at ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2013~~2014, the Company has paid cash in the amount of $~~260~~335,000 pursuant to the agreement, and recorded the amount as prepaid expense - advances on future revenue under the licensing agreement. All payments due under the licensing agreement are current per the terms of the agreement.

~~(2)~~During ~~Technology~~the ~~Development~~period ~~Agreement~~ended September 30, 2014, CTI provided the Company with a notice claiming that additional payments are due under the terms of the agreement with them. The Company has responded advising that all payments required pursuant to the terms of the agreement have been paid in full.

~~On April 24, 2013 the Company signed a letter of intent (LOI) with the National Academy of Science of Ukraine; National Science Centre; Kharkov Institute of Physics and~~ Technology ~~("KIPT"),~~Development ~~Kharkov, Ukraine in regard to a research project dubbed “P-600”.~~Agreement

FOn April 24, 2013 the Company signed a letter of intent (LOI) with the National Academy of Science of Ukraine; National Science Centre; Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology (“KIPT”), Kharkov, Ukraine in regard to a research project dubbed “P-8600”.

P-600 will research the properties of nanocarbon contained matter (graphene) as working material for 3D printing. The project will be a partnership between the Company, Science and Production Establishment “Renewable Energy Sources and Sustainable Technologies” (“RESST”) National Science Center “KIPT” National Academy of Science of Ukraine and Institute of Solid State Physics and Material Science National Science Center “KIPT” National Academy of Science of Ukraine.

On October 17, 2013, the Company finalized an intellectual property agreement for its 3D Project P-600 with the project manager and National Science Centre KIPT of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and remitted the funds to allow commencement of the Project.

Under the agreement, the Company agreed to Project costs of $42,697. Changes to the proposed budget could be made based on agreement of both sides. During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, the Company has paid a total of $44,832 as Project costs which have been recorded as research and development expenditures.

F-10

AMERICAN GRAPHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

(~~UNAUDITED~~Unaudited)

NOTE 3 – TECHNOLOGY AGREEMENTS (continued)

(2) Technology Development Agreement cont’d:

Under the agreement, the Company agreed to Project costs of $42,697. Changes to the proposed budget could be made based on agreement of both sides. During the period ended December 31, 2013, the Company paid $44,832 under the Project.

NOTE 4 – MINERAL PROPERTIES

During January, 2013, we engaged the services of Geomap Exploration Inc. to identify and stake certain mineral claims in an area in Quebec, Canada that has existing exploration for graphite being undertaken by adjacent companies. The staking has been completed and a total of 100 mineral claims have been staked for transfer to the Company. The mineral claims encompass an area of approximately ~~5400~~5,400 hectares (13,343 acres) in Quebec, Canada. They are located in the vicinity of an identified high grade graphite deposits, the Lac Gueret project belonging to Mason Graphite Corp., and new discoveries recently announced by Focus Graphite. Geologically, the property has mineralization similar to other graphite deposits/discoveries in the area. The mineral claims are in an area where the property has been designated by the Quebec Government for major economic, social and environmental development. The mineral claims are 100% owned by the Company with no royalty or net smelter return requirements. The Company had intended to undertake exploration programs on the mineral claims ~~during~~by ~~2013~~the spring of 2014; however, it may ~~be required to~~ undertake the exploration programs during the fall of 2014, dependent on finalizing additional funding and weather conditions.

The costs for staking of $7,179 and fees of $17,289 for geological services rendered to stake the claims were recorded as exploration expenses in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013.

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014 and subsequent period to September 30, 2014, the Company has not expended any funds on the claims. The Company is required to expend a total of $120,000 on the mining claims to keep the claims in good standing, before mid-January 2015.

NOTE 5 – PREPAID EXPENSES AND ADVANCES

The following table provides detail of the Company’s prepaid expenses as of ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014 and June 30, ~~2013~~2014:

	December 31, 2013		June 30, 2013
	September 30, 2014		June 30, 2014
News releases	$	1,~~762~~494	$	-1,494
Advances related to technology agreement – Note 3		~~260~~335,000		~~170~~335,000
	$	~~261~~336,~~762~~494	$	~~170~~336,~~000~~494

NOTE 6 – ~~FINANCING~~SECURITIES ~~AGREEMENTS~~PURCHASE AGREEMENT

On March 14, 2014, the Company closed a financing with three subscribers, whom had previously completed a financing with the Company. Under this Securities Purchase Agreement (1SPA) the ~~Financing~~Company ~~Agreement~~raised a total $300,000 with three accredited investors introduced by Palladium to the Company. Under the terms of the SPA, the purchasers subscribed for a total of 3,750,000 shares of the common stock of the Company at $0.08 per share and an equal number of warrants exercisable at $0.15 per share for a period of five years. Under the SPA the purchasers have the option to purchase up to an equal number of shares and warrants as those purchased on the initial closing for a period of nine months from the initial closing date. Each purchaser shall be entitled to one closing on the exercise of the subsequent closing and option warrants have piggy back registration rights. Subject to no effective registration statement registering the warrants within 180 days after the initial exercise date of the warrants, then the warrants shall have a cashless exercise provision. The warrants further have exercise limitations of 9.99% as a beneficial ownership limitation which the holder may increase or decrease upon 61 days prior notice to the Company, however, the beneficial ownership limitation shall not exceed 9.99% of the number of shares held by the holder.

On August 29, 2012, we entered into an Equity Based Financing Agreement with one non-US investor pursuant to which, the investor agreed to make available up to $2,500,000 by way of advances until August 29, 2013 (the “Completion Date”) in accordance with the terms of the agreement. The Completion Date may be extended for an additional term of up to twelve months at the option of our Company or the investor upon written notice on or before the Completion Date in accordance with the notice provisions of the Financing Agreement. We will issue, within ten (10) Banking Days following the date of the receipt by our Company of any advance under the agreement, shares of our common stock at a price equal to 80% of the average of the closing prices of our common stock for the preceding 5 Banking Days immediately preceding the date of the notice, as quoted on Yahoo Finance or other source of stock quotes as agreed to by the parties.

F-9

AMERICAN GRAPHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 6 – FINANCING AGREEMENTS (continued)

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, the Company received amounts totaling $550,000 under the financing agreement by way of equity private placements for 781,250 shares of common stock at $0.64 per share and 65,736 shares of common stock at $0.76062, respectively. The agreement expired without agreement to extend and therefore the Company will have no further ability to draw down under the agreement.

The shares were issued as follows:

Issue Date	Shares Issued		Value Per Share		Issuance Valuation
September 4, 2012		781,250	$	0.64	$	500,000
May 3, 2013		65,736	$	0.76062	$	50,000

(2) Private Placement Agreement

On May 9th and May 20th, 2013 respectively, we entered into two Private Placement Agreements, one with a U.S. investor and one with a non-US investor pursuant to which, the investors have funded a total of $85,000 by way of private placement units subscription agreements for a total of 188,888 units of the common stock of the Company at a price of $0.45 per unit, each unit consisting of one share and one share purchase warrant entitling the subscribers to purchase one additional share of common stock at $0.75 per share within one year from the original date of the private placement. The 188,888 shares of common stock were issued as of September 30, 2013.

(3) Securities Purchase Agreement (“SPA”)

On September 9, 2013, the Company entered into securities purchase agreements (the “SPA”) to raise a total $600,000 with five accredited investors introduced by Palladium to the Company. Under the terms of the SPA, the purchasers subscribed for a total of 4,000,000 shares of the common stock of the Company at $0.15 per share and an equal number of warrants exercisable at $0.30 per share for a period of five years. Under the SPA the purchasers have the option to purchase up to an equal number of shares and warrants as those purchased on the initial closing for a period of nine months from the initial closing date. Each purchaser shall be entitled to one closing on the exercise of the subsequent closing option warrants have piggy back registration rights. Subject to no effective registration statement registering the warrants within 180 days after the initial exercise date of the warrants, then the warrants shall have a cashless exercise provision. The warrants further have exercise limitations of 4.99% as a beneficial ownership limitation which the holder may increase or decrease upon 61 days prior notice to the Company, however, the beneficial ownership limitation shall not exceed 9.99% of the number of shares held by the holder.

Under the terms of the SPA, the purchasers that hold outstanding stock or warrants at the time of any subsequent funding have the right to participate in any subsequent financing up to 100% of the subsequent financing on the terms negotiated with any funders for a period of eighteen months from the date of the SPA. Further, the shares of common stock issued under the SPA have a purchase price reset until the sooner of (i) the purchaser no longer holds and securities, and (ii) five years after the initial closing date whereby should the Company issue or sell any shares of common stock or any common stock equivalent at a price less than the per share purchase price(the Dilutive Financing”), then the Company shall issue additional shares of common stock to the purchasers who hold outstanding shares on the date of such Dilutive Financing for no additional consideration. The warrants also have a warrant dilution adjustment which requires the issuance of additional warrant shares to reflect any dilutive financing undertaken by the Company whereby the holders of any outstanding warrants shall receive additional warrants based on the price of the Dilutive Financing.

F-10

AMERICAN GRAPHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 6 – FINANCING AGREEMENTS (continued)

(3) Securities Purchase Agreement (“SPA”) - continued

The gross proceeds from issuance of the common stock under the SPA were allocated, at the date of the transaction, based upon the common stock and warrant’s relative fair values. The Company obtained third-party valuations to assist in quantifying the relative fair value of the debt and equity components. As a result of the fact that the warrants include a full reset dilutive feature we have treated the warrants as a derivative liability as of issuance and revalue at each quarterly period thereafter until expiry. The fair value of the warrants was determined using a Monte Carlo Options Lattice model.

Allocation of proceeds arising from the SPA on the inception date is as follows:

Classification	Allocation
Common Stock (par value)		4,000
Paid-in Capital (Common Stock)		(647,455)
Derivative Liabilities (Warrants)		1,243,455
Proceeds	$	600,000

Information and significant assumptions embodied in our valuations (including ranges for certain assumptions during the subject periods that instruments were outstanding) as of the inception date is illustrated in the following tables:

	Warrant Derivative
Warrants to purchase common stock:
Strike price	$	0.30
Volatility		110	%
Term (years)		5.00
Risk-free rate		1.71	%
Dividends		-

Information and significant assumptions embodied in our valuations (including ranges for certain assumptions during the subject periods that instruments were outstanding) as of December 31, 2013 are illustrated in the following tables:

	Warrant Derivative
Warrants to purchase common stock:
Strike price	$	0.30
Volatility		120	%
Term (years)		4.69
Risk-free rate		1.75	%
Dividends		--

(4) Big North Subscription Agreement: On September 9, 2013, the Company entered into a unit subscription agreement with Big North Graphite Corp., for a total of 2,666,667 units at $0.075 per unit. The transaction was subsequently rescinded and the proceeds have been returned to the Company. No shares were issued to the Company by Big North and no shares will be issued as the Offering will not be finalized.

F-11

AMERICAN GRAPHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

(~~UNAUDITED~~Unaudited)

NOTE 6 – SECURITIES PURCHASE AGREEMENT (continued)

Under the terms of the SPA, the purchasers that hold outstanding stock or warrants at the time of any subsequent funding have the right to participate in any subsequent financing up to 100% of the subsequent financing on the terms negotiated with any funders for a period of eighteen months from the date of the SPA, Further, the shares of common stock issued under the SPA have a purchase price reset until the sooner of (i) the purchaser no longer holds and securities, and (ii) five years after the initial closing date whereby should the Company issue or sell any shares of common stock or any common stock equivalent at a price less than the per share purchase price (the Dilutive Financing”), then the Company shall issue additional shares of common stock to the purchasers who hold outstanding shares on the date of such Dilutive Financing for no additional consideration. The warrants also have a warrant dilution adjustment which requires the issuance of additional warrant shares to reflect any dilutive financing undertaken by the Company whereby the holders of any outstanding warrants shall receive additional warrants based on the price of the Dilutive Financing.

The following table summarizes the number of common shares indexed to the derivative financial instruments as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014:

		June 30, 2014				September 30, 2014
3,7500,000 common stock purchase agreement dated March 14, 2014			3,750,000				3,750,000

Information and significant assumptions embodied in our valuations (including ranges for certain assumptions during the subject periods that instruments were outstanding) as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014 are illustrated in the following tables:

	Warrant Derivative
	Revaluation Date (June 30, 2014)				Revaluation Date (September 30, 2014)
Warrants to purchase common stock:
Strike price		$	0.15		$	0.15
Volatility			121.01	%		135.78	%
Term (years)			4.70			4.45
Risk-free rate			1.62	%		1.78	%
Dividends			-			-

On September 30, 2014 as a result of the revaluation of the warrant derivatives the Company recorded a loss of $3,062 in respect of the change in the fair value of the warrant liability.

NOTE 7 – COMMITMENTS

(On August 1), ~~Investor~~2014, ~~Relations~~the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Jim Matthew whereby Jim Matthew will provide the Company with services to include telephone and ~~Marketing~~email ~~Contracts~~investor inquiry responses; dissemination of the Company’s public information upon request to investors and third party; and maintenance of the Company’s investors database and circulation of all press releases or other announcements to the membership list. The agreement is for a term of twelve months until July 31, 2015. The Company shall pay $1,500 per month, payable in advance on the 1st of each month.

~~(i)~~During Onthe ~~April~~period ~~21,~~ended ~~2013,~~September ~~effective as of April 15~~30, ~~2013~~2014, ~~American Graphite Technologies Inc. entered into an agreement with Rosevale Capital S.A. (“Rosevale”) whereby~~ the Company ~~has~~paid ~~engaged~~$3,000 ~~Rosevale~~ to ~~provide~~Jim ~~investor~~Matthew ~~relations~~pursuant ~~and marketing services for~~ the ~~Company (the “Agreement”)~~agreement. ~~The Agreement was for a term of six (6) months, up to and including the close of business on October 14, 2013.~~

In consideration of services to be rendered under the agreement the Company was obligated to:

a) pay to Rosevale a fee in the amount of Two Thousand Five Hundred Dollars (USD$ 2,500) per month; b) upon signing of the Agreement, pay Rosevale for the first three months of service in advance or $7,500; c) reimburse Rosevale for all expenses and disbursements, including all reasonable travel expenses incurred by Rosevale in connection with the performance of Rosevale's duties which amount is not to exceed one thousand USD ($1,000USD) per any one matter.

The Company paid $7,500 for the first three months of services during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013.

During the three month period ended September 30, 2013, the Company paid $7,500 for the second three months of services.

(ii) (ii) On September 12, 2013 the Company entered into an agreement with an Investor Relations consulting firm whereby in consideration for management consulting, business advisory, shareholder information and public relations services, the Company agreed to pay $40,000 and issue 250,000 shares of restricted common stock. The $40,000 was paid in cash during the period ended September 30, 2013. During the period ended September 30, 2013 we issued 250,000 shares of our common stock valued at $0.168 per, totaling $42,000, the fair market value of the shares on the date of issuance has been expensed as stock based compensation.

(2) Agency Agreements

(i) On May 20, 2013, American Graphite Technologies Inc. entered into an agency agreement with Carter Terry & Company (“CT”) whereby the Company engaged CT to act as a non-exclusive financial advisor investment bank and placement agent on a “best efforts” basis for a period of twelve months, with an option to extend for an additional six months. CT is to assist the Company in one or more capital raises which might result in a private placement, merger, acquisition, sale of assets, sale of common stock, sale of ownership interest or any other financial transaction. The Company is seeking to raise additional investment capital to fund its current projects.

In consideration of CT entering into the agreement, the Company is required to:

a) pay to CT a fee by way of 75,000 restricted shares of the common stock of the Company;

b) pay a success fee by way of cash consideration of 10% of the amount for any capital raised other than an equity line and 4% cash consideration for an equity line or equity enhanced program and pay an amount of restricted shares equal to 10,000 shares per $100,000 of capital raise for a period of two years. The shares will have piggy back registration rights. The Company shall also be responsible for the payment of any expenses related to the entry into and drafting of any documents as required, subject to prior approval on any expenditures exceeding $2,500.

F-12

AMERICAN GRAPHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC. (An Exploration Stage Company) Notes to the Financial Statements (UNAUDITED) NOTE 7 – COMMITMENTS (continued) During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, we issued 75,000 shares of our common stock valued at $0.59 per, totaling $44,250, which was the fair market value of the shares on the date of issuance and has been expensed as stock based compensation.

~~(ii)~~Notes ~~On August 12, 2013, the Company entered into a Placement Agent Agreement with Palladium Capital Advisors, LLC (“Palladium”) whereby Palladium agreed~~ to ~~act as~~ the ~~Company’s~~Financial non-exclusive agent in a private placement or similar unregistered transaction of equity or equity-linked securities of the Company. The Agreement is for a period of twelve months from the date of execution. The Company shall pay to Palladium, upon the closing of each transaction with investors, (i) seven percent (7%) of the aggregate consideration raised in each closing in cash; (ii) three percent (3%) of the aggregate consideration in shares of the Company’s common stock, calculated based upon the price of the common stock as offered in each transaction; and (iii) warrants to purchase seven (7%) of the Company’s common stock at each closing, identical to any warrants issued to investors. The foregoing fees are payable for any sale of securities during the twelve month term or within twenty-four months thereafter with respect to investors identified by Palladium. The Company is further required to pay expenses incurred by Palladium, including the fees and expenses of its legal counsel and any advisor retained by Palladium. Fees and expenses in excess of $15,000 require prior written authorization from the Company. On September 9, 2013, the Company closed a financing with five subscribers (ref note 6(3)) and paid to Palladium cash consideration of $42,000, share consideration by way of the issuance of 120,000 shares of common stock of the Company and issued a total of 280,000 stock purchase warrants, each warrant exercisable at $0.30 per share for a period of five years from the date of issuance.Statements

(Unaudited)

NOTE 8 – CAPITAL STOCK

OnAs ~~July 18, 2012, in accordance with approval from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), we increased our authorized capital from 75,000,000 to 200,000,000 shares~~ of ~~common~~September ~~stock,~~30 ~~par~~and ~~value~~June ~~of $0.001. In addition~~30, ~~our issued and outstanding shares of common stock increased from 619~~2014,~~500~~ ~~to 77~~96,~~437~~083,~~500~~348 shares of common stock, ~~par~~were ~~value of $0.001 on the basis of a 125:1 forward split of our~~ issued and outstanding ~~shares of common stock~~. ~~All references to shares and per share information in the financial statements and related notes have been adjusted to reflect the stock split on a retroactive basis.~~

OnNOTE ~~June~~9 ~~21,~~– ~~2010,~~SHARE aPURCHASE ~~former director of the Company purchased 1,500,000,000 (pre-forward split - 12,000,000) shares of the common stock in the Company at $0.001 per share for $12,000.~~WARRANTS

On ~~August~~March 2614, ~~2011~~2014, the Company ~~issued~~entered into 32securities purchase agreements to raise a total $300,~~437~~000 with three accredited investors introduced by Palladium to the Company. Under the terms of the SPA,~~500~~ the purchasers subscribed for a total of 3,750,000 shares of the common stock ~~for~~of the Company at $~~5,190~~0.08 per share and an equal number of warrants exercisable at $0.15 per share for a period of five years. (see note 6 above).

OnAs ~~June~~at ~~11,~~September ~~2012~~30, ~~a director of the Company returned a total of 1~~2014,~~455,000,000~~ ~~shares for cancellation. Due to~~ the ~~fact that the shares under this agreement have been cancelled for no consideration to reduce the number of shares outstanding, the~~ Company ~~considered~~had the ~~change~~following inwarrants ~~capital structure from the cancellation a reverse stock split. In accordance with SAB Topic 4.c, the Company recorded the cancellation retroactively.~~outstanding:

Exercise Price	Expiry Date	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)	Outstanding at June 30, 2014	Issued	Exercised	Waived	Expired	Outstanding at September 30, 2014
$0.15	March 14, 2019	4.45	4,012,500	-	-	-	-	4,012,500
			4,012,500					4,012,500

NOTE 10 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Rick Walchuk

On May 1, 2012, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Rick Walchuk, a director of the Company, for management services. The consulting agreement became effective as of May 1, 2012 and shall continue to May 1, 2015. Under the consulting agreement, the Company shall pay $2,500 a month for the first six months, $5,000 a month for the next six months and $7,500 for the balance of the agreement payable on the 1st of each month. During the three month ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, Mr. Walchuk invoiced the company for the services in the amount of $22,500. As at September 30, 2014, no amounts are owing to Mr. Walchuk.

On October 8, 2014, Rick Walchuk resigned from all officer positions and remains as a director of the Company.

Con Evan Anast

On December 13, 2013, the Board of Directors of the Company appointed Con Evan Anast to the Board of Directors of the Company.

On October 8, 2014the Company appointed Con Evan Anast as its President, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer.

On December 15, 2013, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Anast for the provision of services to the Company as Secretary and management consultant. Under the terms of the consulting agreement, Mr. Anast has agreed to provide a minimum of 40 hours per month to the Company’s business operations. The contract is for a term of three years commencing on December 15, 2013 for a monthly consulting fee of $5,000 per month, of which a total of $2,000 is payable and $3,000 per month is to be accrued monthly. Effective May 1, 2014 it was agreed that Mr. Anast would be paid $3,000 per month and $2,000 would be accrued as a result of increased hours required to be devoted to corporate efforts. During the three month ended September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2013, Mr. Anast invoiced the company for the services in the amount of $15,00 and $nil, respectively, of which a total of $9,000 was paid in full during the three month ended September 30, 2014 and as of September 30, 2014 $29,740 is accrued ($23,740 – June 30, 2014).

F-13

AMERICAN GRAPHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

(~~UNAUDITED~~Unaudited)

NOTE 811 – ~~CAPITAL~~PROVISION ~~STOCK~~FOR ~~(Continued)~~INCOME TAXES

On May 3, 2013, we issued 65,736 shares of our common stock at a price of $0.76062 per share, pursuant to the closing of a private placement, for gross proceeds of $50,000. The private placement was undertaken pursuant to a financing agreement that we entered into on August 29, 2012 (see Note 6 (1) above).

On May 20, 2013, we issued 75,000 shares of our common stock valued at $0.59 per share, totaling $44,250, the fair market value of the shares on the date of issuance, pursuant to the agency agreement (see Note 7(2)(i) above).

On July 11, 2013 we issued total of 188,888 units at a price of $0.45 per unit in connection with the private placements accepted on May 9 and May 20th 2013.

On September 9, 2013, the Company issued total of 4,000,000 shares of the common stock of the Company at $0.15 per share and an equal number of warrants exercisable at $0.30 per share for a period of five years for gross proceeds of $600,000. (see Note 6(3) above).

On September 12, 2013, the Company issued total of 120,000 shares of the common stock of the Company at par value and an equal number of warrants exercisable at $0.30 per share for a period of five years under the placement agent agreement. (see Note 7(2)(ii) above).

On September 16, 2013 the Company issued 250,000 shares of restricted common stock valued at $0.168 per share, totaling $42,000, the fair market value of the shares on the date of issuance, pursuant to the Investor Relations agreement (see Note 7(1)(ii) above). As of December 31, 2013, 82,918,374 shares of common stock were issued and outstanding.

NOTE 9 – STOCK OPTIONS

On July 30, 2012, the Company entered into two 12-month Consulting Services and Finder’s Fee Agreements (the “Consulting Agreements”) with third parties. The Consulting Agreements require the consultants to provide to the Company, customized problem and opportunity research, new business or services development, strategy development and refinements, acquisition assistance, marketing and investor relation services and the Company is required to grant to each of the consultants a total of 150,000 stock options vesting immediately and exercisable at $0.25 per share. The Company granted 300,000 stock options which have vested. The stock options expired on September 30, 2013 which was 60 days after the termination of the Consulting Agreements.

The following table summarizes information concerning stock options as of December 31, 2013:

	December 31, 2013				June 30, 2013
		Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price $	Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price $
Outstanding at beginning of the year			300,000	0.25		-	-
Granted			-	-		300,000	0.25
Exercised			-	-		-	-
Expired or cancelled			(300,000)	(0.25)		-	-
Outstanding at end of period			-	-		300,000	0.25

The Company recognized stock-based compensation of $187,200 in the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013.

F-14

AMERICAN GRAPHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 9 – STOCK OPTIONS (continued)

Valuation Assumptions

The Company accounts for share-based payments pursuant to ASC 718, “Stock Compensation” and, accordingly, the Company records compensation expense for share-based awards based upon an assessment of the grant date fair value for stock options and restricted stock awards using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair value of stock options under the Black-Scholes model requires management to make assumptions regarding projected employee stock option exercise behaviors, risk-free interest rates, volatility of the Company’s stock price and expected dividends.

Stock compensation expense for stock options is recognized over the vesting period of the award or expensed immediately under ASC 718 and EITF 96-18 when options are given for service without further recourse. The Company issued stock options to contractors to provide services to the Company during the fiscal year. However, the stock options have already been granted to the service providers and there is no claw back provision in the options if services are not performed. Under ASC 718 and EITF 96-18 these options were recognized as expense in the period issued because they were given as a form of compensation for services to be rendered with no recourse.

The following table presents the range of the weighted average fair value of options granted and the related assumptions used in the Black-Scholes model for stock option grants made during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013:

			Options Granted
			July 30, 2012
Fair value of options granted			$	0.85
Assumptions used:
Expected life (years) (a)				1.00
Risk free interest rate (b)				0.18	%
Volatility (c)				111	%
Dividend yield (d)				0.00	%
	a)	Expected life: The expected term of options granted is determined using the “shortcut” method allowed by SAB No.107. Under this approach, the expected term is presumed to be the mid-point between the vesting date and the end of the contractual term.
	b)	Risk-free interest rate: The rate is based on the U.S. Treasury zero-coupon yield curve on the grant date for a maturity similar to the expected life of the options.

c) Volatility: The expected volatility of the Company’s common stock is calculated by using the historical daily volatility of the Company’s stock price calculated over a period of time representative of the expected life of the options. d) Dividend yield: The dividend yield rate is not considered in the model, as the Company has not established a dividend policy for the stock.

F-15

AMERICAN GRAPHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 10 – SHARE PURCHASE WARRANTS

On May 9th and May 20th, 2013 respectively, we entered into two Private Placement Agreements, one with a U.S. investor and one with a non-US investor pursuant to which, the investors have funded a total of $85,000 by way of a private placement units subscription agreement for a total of 188,888 units of the common stock of the Company at a price of $0.45 per unit, each unit consisting of one share and one share purchase warrant entitling the subscriber to purchase one additional share of common stock at $0.75 per share within one year from the original date of the private placement.

As at December 31, 2013, the Company had the following warrants outstanding:

Exercise Price	Expiry Date	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)	Outstanding at June 30, 2013	Issued	Exercised	Expired	Outstanding at December 31, 2013
$ 0.75	May 9, 2014	0.35	88,888	-	-	-	88,888
$ 0.75	May 20, 2014	0.38	100,000	-	-	-	100,000
$ 0.30	September 4, 2018	4.68	-	4,000,000	-	-	4,000,000
$ 0.30	September 12, 2018	4.70	-	120,000	-	-	120,000
			188,888	4,120,000	-	-	4,308,888

NOTE 11 – SHORT TERM LOAN

On June 20, 2012, the Company received funds from a third party in the amount of $40,000.

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2013, the Company repaid in full in the amount of $40,876, which included the principal amount of $40,000 and accrued interest of $876, based on 10% per annum as agreed to between the Company and the lender.

NOTE 12 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

F-16

AMERICAN GRAPHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 12 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Continued)

On December 13, 2013, the Board of the Directors of the Company appointed Con Evan Anast to the Board of Directors of the Company.

On December 15, 2013, the Company entered into a consulting agreement with Mr. Anast for the provision of services to the Company as Secretary and management consultant. Under the terms of the consulting agreement, Mr. Anast has agreed to provide a minimum of 40 hours per month to the Company’s business operations. The contract is for a term of three years commencing on December 15, 2013 for a monthly consulting fee of $5,000 per month, of which a total of $2,000 is payable and $3,000 per month is to be accrued monthly. During the period ended December 31, 2013, Mr. Anast invoiced the company for the services in the amount of $2,900, of which a total of $1,160 is payable and paid in full as of December 31, 2013 and $1,740 is accrued.

NOTE 13 – PROVISION FOR INCOME TAXES

Deferred income taxes are determined using the liability method for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and income tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Deferred income taxes are measured based on the tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences are included in the Company’s tax return. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on anticipated future tax consequences attributable to differences between financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.

Operating loss carry-forwards generated during the period from June 1, 2010 (date of inception) through ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014 of approximately $~~715~~943,~~873~~700, will begin to expire in 2030. The Company applies a statutory income tax rate of 35%. Accordingly, deferred tax assets related to net operating loss carry-forwards total approximately $~~250~~330,~~555~~300 at ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014. For the ~~six~~three month periods ended ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013, the valuation allowance increased by approximately $~~106~~23,~~918~~600 and $6152,~~649~~838, respectively.

The Company has no tax positions at ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014, or June 30, ~~2013~~2014, for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility.

The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses. The Company had no accruals for interest and penalties since inception.

The tax returns for the years from inception to ~~June~~September 30, ~~2013~~2014 are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.

NOTE 14 – ~~SUBSEQUENT~~OTHER EVENTS

On April 28, 2014, Rick Walchuk, a director of our company was arrested in Palaio Faliro, Greece under an international arrest warrant issued in connection with claims asserted against Mr. Walchuk by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, in regards to an unaffiliated company. Mr. Walchuk has not been found guilty of any claim asserted against him and denies any allegations against him. Mr. Walchuk intends to vigorously defend all claims asserted against him and presently remains in custody in the State of Pennsylvania awaiting the commencement of hearings set for October 20, 2014. As at the date of this report hearings planned for October 2014 have been posted and are expected to commence in December 2014.

NOTE 15 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On October 16, 2014 the Company incorporated a wholly owned subsidiary, 9311-2571 Québec Inc. in order to stake additional mineral claims in the Province of Quebec.

On October 24, 2014 the Company entered into a Consulting Services Agreement with Geomap Exploration Inc. (“Geomap”) whereunder Geomap has been retained to acquire further graphite exploration property(ies) for a total cost of CDN$26,000, payable as to CDN$12,000 upon signing of the agreement, which amount has been paid as at the date of this report, and a further $14,000 upon completion of staking of approximately 80 to 100 claims for graphite exploration, and a summary geological report. The claims once staked will be held by the Company’s wholly owned Quebec subsidiary.

The Company has evaluated subsequent events from the balance sheet date through the date that the financial statements were issued and determined that there were no subsequent events to disclose.

F-1714

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This current report contains forward-looking statements relating to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may", "should", "intends", "expects", "plans", "anticipates", "believes", "estimates", "predicts", "potential", or "continue" or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause our or our industry's actual results, levels of activity or performance to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity or performance expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity or performance. You should not place undue reliance on these statements, which speak only as of the date that they were made. These cautionary statements should be considered with any written or oral forward-looking statements that we may issue in the future. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results, later events or circumstances or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

In this report unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States dollars and all references to “common shares” refer to the common shares of our capital stock.

The management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP").

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements for the year ended June 30, 2013, along with the accompanying notes. As used in this quarterly report, the terms "we", "us", "our", and ~~the~~"our company"~~Company"~~ means American Graphite Technologies Inc. and our wholly owned subsidiary, 9311-2571 Québec Inc., a Quebec, Canada corporation.

~~Liquidity~~Corporate ~~& Capital Resources~~Information

WeThe ~~are~~address anof ~~exploration~~our ~~stage~~principal ~~company~~executive ~~engaged~~office inis ~~the~~3651 ~~exploration~~Lindell ofRoad, ~~mineral~~Ste. ~~properties~~D#422, ~~and~~Las ~~the~~Vegas, ~~development~~Nevada. ofOur ~~related~~telephone ~~technologies.~~number Tois ~~date,~~(702) we473-8227. ~~have~~Our ~~not~~website ~~generated~~is ~~any revenues~~http://americangraphitetechnologies.com.

~~Cash~~Our oncommon ~~hand~~stock atis ~~December~~quoted ~~31, 2013 was $257,832 as compared to $116,588 as of June 30, 2013. We had a total of $261,762 in prepaid expenses~~ on ~~December 31, 2013 as compared to $170,000 in prepaid expenses as at June 30, 2013. Prepaid expenses relate to~~ the ~~$260,000~~OTCBB ~~paid against~~ (“Over-the-Counter- ~~licensing~~Bulletin-Board”) ~~agreement~~under ~~with Cheap Tubes and prepaid expenses for general and administration costs in~~ the ~~amount~~symbol ~~of $1,762~~“AGIN”.

Our ~~total~~company ~~current~~was ~~liabilities~~incorporated atin ~~December~~the ~~31,~~State ~~2013~~of ~~were~~Nevada ~~$14,292~~on ~~as compared to $8,806 as at~~ June ~~30, 2013. The total long term liabilities at December 31, 2013 were $~~1,~~213,456~~ as2010 ~~compared~~under to $Nil at June 30, 2013. This significant change is solely related to a derivative warrant liability which occurred as a result of operating funds received from a units private placement undertaken during the ~~six~~name ~~months~~Green ~~ended~~& ~~December~~Quality ~~31,~~Home ~~2013~~Live, ~~whereby the Company raised $600,000 to fund operations~~Inc. The private placement required the issuance of warrants, which are accounted for as a derivative liability. We currently have mineral claims which potentially could have graphite deposits and two projects related to graphene or products related to graphene.

~~During~~On ~~our~~May ~~six month period ended December 31~~23, ~~2013 and the fiscal year ended June 30~~2012, ~~2013,~~we ~~the~~underwent ~~Company~~a ~~was~~change ~~successful in raising the required funding for operations by way~~ of ~~private~~control ~~placements. During~~and ~~the~~on ~~period~~June ~~ended December 31~~11, ~~2013 the Company completed a private placement in the amount of $600~~2012,~~000~~ ~~(net~~our ~~$533,000)~~company’s ~~which~~newly ~~the~~appointed ~~Company~~sole ~~believes~~director ~~will~~and bemajority ~~sufficient~~shareholder toapproved ~~meet~~a ~~its~~name ~~ongoing~~change ~~expenditures through~~ to ~~the~~ ~~fiscal~~American ~~year~~Graphite ~~ended~~Technologies ~~June 30, 2014~~Inc. ~~The~~ ~~Company has obligations in excess of the funds raised if it wishes to fund the $120,000 that is required for exploration of its mineral claims~~ and ~~should~~a ~~there~~125 benew ~~additional cash requirements~~ for ~~the~~1 ~~Cheap~~old ~~Tubes~~forward ~~project~~stock ~~and~~split ~~the development~~ of ~~the~~our ~~3-D~~company’s ~~project. At~~issued ~~this time, the additional cash requirements for the Cheap Tubes project~~ and ~~the~~outstanding ~~3-D~~shares ~~projects~~of ~~cannot~~common ~~be estimated~~stock. ~~Operating~~ ~~costs~~Concurrent ~~for~~with the ~~Company~~forward ~~over~~split ~~the~~we ~~next~~amended ~~twelve~~our ~~months~~authorized ~~for~~capital ~~general~~from ~~and administrative expenses~~75, ~~including contractual expenses and fees for legal~~000,000 ~~accounting, audit and filing fees are estimated~~ to ~~be approximately $~~200,000~~. Including the $200~~,000 ~~for operating expenses and the $120,000 for exploration expenses estimated for the next twelve months, the Company as at December 31, 2013 had a short fall of approximately $62,000~~.

Effective July 12, 2012, we filed the Certificate of Amendment with the State of Nevada and effective July 18, 2012 in accordance with approval from the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”), we changed our name from Green & Quality Home Life, Inc. to American Graphite Technologies Inc. and increased our authorized capital from 75,000,000 to 200,000,000 shares of common stock, par value of $0.001. In addition, our issued and outstanding shares of common stock increased from 619,500 to 77,437,500 shares of common stock, par value of $0.001 on the basis of a 125:1 forward split of our issued and outstanding shares of common stock.

New management of our company determined to change the direction of our company and to enter into mining exploration and development related to graphite and the acquisition and development of technologies related thereto. Our company has two projects, a mineral exploration project whereby we intend to explore for graphite and a licensing agreement for the development and marketing of a technology related to the graphene industry.

Other than as set out herein, we have not been involved in any bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings, nor have we been a party to any material reclassification, merger, consolidation or purchase or sale of a significant amount of assets not in the ordinary course of our business.

Previous Business

Before we went through a change of control and business focus, we were a development stage company intending to create a portfolio of products and services (controlling heating, ventilation and air conditioning) and develop a set of solutions which would automate these domestic activities. The lack of funds and the present economy prevented that from happening. As we were unable to raise the capital necessary to develop our business plan, we began a search for other business opportunities which may benefit our shareholders and allow us to raise capital and operate.

Current Business

Shortly after changing out business focus to exploration stage properties, we identified certain opportunities to engage in the development of technologies relate to graphite and graphene and determined to pursue that business. We entered into negotiations on projects, both graphite properties and technologies. On July 31, 2012, our company entered into a Letter of Intent with a private US company for an option to participate in a 100% interest in all of certain property rights held by the U.S. private company. We were unable to close that acquisition. Subsequently, we identified the opportunities for entry into our business by way of an agreement for the licensing and marketing of Bucky Paper, which is a product currently under development that is produced from graphene. On December 3, 2012, we entered into and executed a non-exclusive technology license agreement for patent and trade secret technology in the field of graphene oxide or “Bucky” paper with Cheap Tubes, Inc. Pursuant to the terms of the agreement, we acquired the rights to further develop, commercialize, market and distribute certain proprietary inventions and know-how related to the manufacturing processes for graphene products, including as Bucky Paper. We agreed to fund commercial development activities and we received a license for the rights on a nonexclusive basis for marketing products and/or services. Up to June 30, 2014, our company has funded a total of $335,000 in respect of this commercial development project, and Cheap Tubes has set up a production line and research and development facility in its new facility in Vermont, and with this process ongoing, our company hopes to be fully functional soon.

During the month of January 2013, our company undertook the staking of certain mining claims in the Province of Quebec, Canada. In order to hold the property in the Province of Quebec, either a principal of our company or our company must have a prospector’s license. The prospector’s license was granted to our director, Rick Walchuk on February 2, 2013 and the mineral concession is held in the name of Mr. Walchuk under a trust agreement with our company. The mining claims are in an active area of graphite exploration and production. We had intended to undertake an exploration program on the claims during the year ended June 30, 2014, but were delayed in getting a proposal underway by a qualified geologist. Additionally, we focused the majority of our efforts funding the Bucky Paper commercialization project, as well as research project for 3D printing, as described below. We are currently awaiting a program to be presented by a geologist in regard to the initial work program to be undertaken on the mineral claims for spring 2015, and are also pursuing the staking of additional claims in the fall of 2014.

~~The~~During ~~Company~~the ~~believes~~month itof ~~will~~April, ~~need~~2013, towe ~~raise~~met anwith ~~additional~~representatives ~~$250,000~~of ~~for~~the ~~operations~~National toAcademy ~~ensure~~of itScience ~~can~~of ~~fund~~the ~~obligations~~Ukraine onNational ~~all~~Science Center – Kharkov Institute of ~~its~~Physics ~~projects. While~~and ~~there~~Techniques ~~are~~(the ~~warrants~~“Kharkov ~~outstanding~~Institute”) ~~pursuant~~in regard to ~~prior~~the ~~financings~~establishment ~~undertaken~~of bya collaboration between the ~~Company,~~Kharkov ~~there~~Institute ~~can~~and beour nocompany ~~assurance~~on ~~that~~a project for the ~~Company~~research ~~will~~of ~~raise~~the ~~any~~properties ~~funds~~of ~~from~~grapheme ~~warrant~~contained ~~exercises~~matter ~~and~~as ~~the~~a ~~Company~~working ~~currently~~material ~~has~~for no3D-printing and other ~~financing~~uses. ~~agreements~~Our ~~under~~company ~~which~~and itthe ~~can~~Kharkov ~~raise~~Institute ~~funding. The~~will ~~Company~~be ~~intends~~working tounder ~~seek~~the ~~additional~~auspices ~~equity~~of ~~financings~~the Science and ~~loans~~Technology toCenter ~~fund~~in the ~~expected~~Ukraine, ~~shortfall~~which inis ~~funding~~an ~~but~~intergovernmental ~~there~~organization ~~can~~founded beby nothe ~~assurance~~governments ~~that~~of ~~such~~the ~~funding~~Ukraine, ~~will~~Canada, bethe ~~available~~EU and ifthe ~~available~~USA itwhich ~~will~~supports beresearch onand ~~favorable~~development ~~terms. You~~activities ~~may~~for ~~face~~peaceful ~~substantial~~applications ~~dilution~~by inUkrainian, ~~your~~Georgian, ~~share~~Uzbekistani, ~~holdings~~Azerbaijani, onand ~~any~~Moldovan ~~ongoing~~scientists ~~financings~~and ~~which~~engineers. ~~the~~The ~~Company~~project ~~may~~requires ~~negotiate. Should~~ the ~~Company~~approval ~~not~~of bethe ~~able~~U.S. toDepartment ~~raise~~of ~~additional~~State, ~~funding~~Bureau itof ~~may~~International ~~not~~Security beand ~~able~~Nonproliferation toOffice ~~fund~~of ~~the~~Cooperative ~~exploration~~Threat ofReduction. ~~its~~On ~~mineral~~April ~~claims~~1, or2013, itwe ~~may~~submitted ~~have~~the documents to ~~delay~~the orU.S. ~~terminate~~Department ~~its~~of ~~ongoing~~State. ~~technology~~On ~~development. At~~October ~~this~~1, ~~time~~2013, the ~~Company~~project ~~cannot~~was ~~state~~granted ~~with~~live ~~certainty~~status ~~that~~and itour ~~will~~company becan ~~able~~now tocommence ~~raise~~the ~~sufficient~~research ~~funding~~project. toThe ~~continue~~project ~~with~~is ~~all~~called ofP600 ~~its~~and ~~intended~~is ~~projects~~a collaboration between our company and the Kharkov Institute.

The project is designed to research the properties of nanocarbon contained matter as a working material for 3D printing. The project team will consist of 8 scientists and doctors with experience in the fields of nanotechnology, 3D printing, solid state physics, physical materials and thermal physics.

The mandate of the project is to research the properties of materials containing nanostructured carbon, primarily graphene, to research the existing and prospective methods of 3D printing and analyze the possibility of applying the techniques to create 3D objects using nanocarbon material. During the year ended June 30, 2014, we paid a total of $44,832 as project costs in order to fully fund the program as required, and are awaiting project results in order to determine next steps.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash on hand at September 30, 2014 was $250,272 as compared to $307,693 as of June 30, 2014. We had a total of $336,494 in prepaid expenses on September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014. Prepaid expenses relate to amounts totaling $335,000 paid against the licensing agreement with Cheap Tubes and the balance are prepaid expenses related to general and administration costs in the amount of $1,494.

Our total current liabilities at September 30, 2014 were $39,729 as compared to $32,795 as at June 30, 2014. The total long term liabilities at September 30, 2014 were $557,890 as compared to $554,828 at June 30, 2014.

During our fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, our company was successful in raising the required funding for operations by way of private placements. During the period ended March 31, 2014 we completed private placements in the amount of $600,000 (net $533,000) and $300,000 (net $266,500) which our company believes will be sufficient to meet our ongoing expenditures through to the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. We believe we now has sufficient funds on hand for all our current commitments including $120,000 that is required for exploration of our mineral claims, should we determine to commence exploration. Additionally we believe we have sufficient funds on hand should there be additional cash requirements for the Cheap Tubes project and the development of the 3-D project during the current fiscal year. At this time, the additional cash requirements for the Cheap Tubes project and the 3-D projects cannot be estimated. Operating costs for our company over the next twelve months for general and administrative expenses, including contractual expenses and fees for legal, accounting, audit and filing fees are estimated to be approximately $200,000. Our company may need to raise additional capital for operations and for operations of Cheap Tubes, if warranted. We have warrants outstanding pursuant to our recent financings, however, there can be no assurance that our company will raise any funds from warrant exercises and our company currently has no other financing agreements under which it can raise funding.

There can be no assurance that such funding, if required, will be available and if available it will be on favorable terms. You may face substantial dilution in your share holdings on any ongoing financings which our company may negotiate. Should we not be able to raise additional funding if and when required, we may have to delay or terminate our ongoing technology development. At this time, our company cannot state with certainty that we will be able to raise sufficient funding to continue with all of our intended projects.

Results of Operations

We do not have any revenues and have not had any revenue since inception on June 1, 2010.

~~Three~~We ~~Month~~have ~~Period~~a ~~Ended~~net ~~December~~loss 31of $67,417 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to a net loss of $192,968 for the same period ended September 30, 2013 ~~Compared~~and operating losses of $64,355 for the three months ended September 30, 2014 as compared to ~~Three~~operating ~~Month~~losses ~~Period~~of ~~Ended~~$190,069 ~~December~~for 31the three months ended September 30, ~~2012~~2013. There was significant reduction in our operational losses, period over period. Office and general administrative expenses decreased to $2,040 from $44,439 (2013), consulting fees decreased to $12,714 from $67,008 (2013) and stock based compensation decreased to $nil from $42,000 (2013). Management fees increased to $37,500 from $22,500 (2013) due to a contractual increase in fees negotiated in prior periods.

~~Losses~~Basic ~~remained~~and ~~relatively~~diluted ~~constant~~losses ~~period~~per ~~over~~share ~~period with a net loss of $124,512~~ for the ~~three~~respective ~~months ended December 31, 2013 as compared to a net loss of $115,683 for~~ three months ended December 31, 2012 due to an offset of $32,898 during the three months ended December 31, 2013 related to the change in the valuation of warrant liabilities which offset operating expenses of $157,410 during the three months ended December 31, 2013 as compared to operating expenses of $115,583 during the three months ended December 31, 2012. Therefore, while we had no significant increases in net losses, the Company had a significant increase in operating losses of $41,827. The increase for the three month ~~period~~periods ended ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014 ~~is related to an expenditure for research~~ and ~~development~~September ~~in the amount of $44~~30,~~832,~~ with no comparable expenditure for the three months ended December 31, 2012. Office and general increased to $39,072 from $17,913 (2012) due to increased fees related to reporting requirements as the Company created derivative warrant liability reporting with its financing agreements, management fees increased to $25,400 (2013) ~~from~~was ~~$12,500~~ (~~2012) , consulting fees increased to~~ $~~32,318 (2013~~0.00) ~~from $28,468 (2012) and professional fees increased to $15,788 (2013) from $10,002 (2012) as the Company continued to increase activities related to operations, including financing activities~~. The losses were offset by a decrease in stock based compensation to $Nil for the three months ended December 31, 2013 as compared to an expense of $46,800 during the three months ended December 31, 2012.

~~Basic~~Off-Balance ~~and~~Sheet ~~diluted losses per share for the respective three month periods ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012was ($0.00).~~Arrangements

~~Six~~We ~~Month~~have ~~Period~~no ~~ended~~off-balance ~~December~~sheet ~~31,~~arrangements ~~2013~~that ~~Compared~~have or are reasonably likely to ~~Six~~have ~~Month~~a ~~Period~~current ~~Ended~~or ~~December~~future 31effect on our financial condition, ~~2012~~changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to stockholders.

WeCritical ~~have~~Accounting aPolicies ~~net loss of $317,480 for the six months ended December 31, 2013 as compared to a net loss of $254,141for six months ended December 31, 2012~~ and operating losses of $347,479 for the six months ended December 31, 2013 as compared to operating losses of $253,375 for the six months ended December 31, 2012. Net loss for the six months ended December 31, 2013 was offset by the valuation of the change in the fair value of the warrant liability with no comparable offset during the six months ended December 31, 2012. The substantial increase in operating losses of $94,104 was mainly related to increase activities related to operations, including financing activities. Research and development expenses for the six months ended December 31, 2013 were $44,832, with no comparable expense during the six months ended December 31, 2012. office and general increased to $83,511 from $35,833 (2012) due to increased fees related to reporting requirements as the Company created derivative warrant liability reporting with its financing agreements, management fees increased to $47,900 (2013) from $12,500 (2012) due to a contractual increase in fees, consulting fees increased to $99,326 (2013) from $94,683 (2012) and professional fees increased to $29,910 (2013) from $24,859 (2012) as the Company continued to increase activities related to operations, including financing activities. The 2013 losses reflected a decrease in stock based compensation to $42,000 for the six months ended December 31, 2013 as compared to $78,000 during the six months ended December 31, 2012.Estimates

7The preparation of our financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and judgments which are based on historical experience and on various other factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. The results of their evaluation form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and circumstances. Our significant accounting policies are more fully discussed in the Notes to our Financial Statements.

~~From~~Recent ~~inception~~Accounting we have had a net loss of $959,324 and an operating loss of $988,446 .Pronouncements

~~Basic~~On ~~and~~June ~~diluted~~10, ~~losses~~2014, ~~per~~The ~~share~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, consolidation, which removes all incremental financial reporting requirements from GAAP for development stage entities, including the ~~respective~~removal ~~six~~of ~~month~~Topic ~~periods~~915 ~~ended~~from the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. For the first annual period beginning after December 3115, ~~2013~~2014, the presentation and disclosure requirements in Topic 915 will no longer be required for the public business entities. The revised consolidation standards are effective one year later, in annual periods beginning after December 3115, ~~2012~~2015. ~~was~~Early ~~($0~~adoption is permitted.~~00)~~ Our company has adopted the amendment.

There are several new accounting pronouncements issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) which are not yet effective. Each of these pronouncements, as applicable, has been or will be adopted by our company. As of June 30, 2014, none of these pronouncements is expected to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of our company.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

~~Evaluation~~Management’s ofReport on Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We ~~carried~~maintain out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, Mr. Rick Walchuk, our Principal Executive Officer who is also our Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design of our disclosure controls and procedures ~~(as defined by Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e)) as of December 31, 2013, pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15. Based upon~~ that ~~evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures~~ are ~~not~~designed ~~effective~~to asensure ~~of December 31, 2013 in ensuring~~ that information required to be disclosed ~~by us~~ in our reports ~~that~~filed ~~we file or submit~~ under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’'s rules and forms., ~~This~~and ~~conclusion is based on findings~~ that ~~constituted~~such ~~material~~information ~~weaknesses. A material weakness~~ is aaccumulated ~~deficiency,~~and orcommunicated ato ~~combination~~our ~~of control deficiencies~~management, inincluding ~~internal~~our ~~control~~president ~~over~~and chief financial ~~reporting~~officer ~~such~~(our ~~that~~principal ~~there~~executive isofficer, aprincipal ~~reasonable~~financial ~~possibility~~officer ~~that~~and aprincipal ~~material~~accounting ~~misstatement~~officer) ofto ~~the~~allow ~~Company’s~~for ~~interim~~timely ~~financial~~decisions ~~statements~~regarding ~~will~~required ~~not be prevented or detected on a timely basis~~disclosure.

InAs ~~performing~~of the ~~above-referenced~~end ~~assessment~~of the quarter covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our president and chief financial officer (our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Based on the foregoing, our president and chief financial officer (our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. Our company is in the process of adopting specific internal control mechanisms with our board and officers’ collaboration to ensure effectiveness as we grow. We have engaged an outside consultant to assist in adopting new measures to improve upon our internal controls. Future controls, among other things, will include more checks and balances and communication strategies between the management ~~identified~~and the ~~following~~board ~~material~~to ~~weaknesses:~~ensure efficient and effective oversight over company activities as well as more stringent accounting policies to track and update our financial reporting.

1)Changes Wein ~~currently~~Internal doControl not have an audit committee or an independent audit committee financial expert. While not being legally obligated to have an audit committee or independent audit committee financial expert, it is the management’s view that to have an audit committee, comprised of independent board members, and an independent audit committee financial expert is an important entity-level control over ~~financial~~Financial ~~statements;~~Reporting

2)There ~~Inadequate~~were ~~staffing~~no ~~and~~changes ~~supervision within our bookkeeping operations. We have one consultant involved~~ in bookkeeping functions, who provides two staff members. The relatively small number of people who are responsible for bookkeeping functions and the fact that they are from the same firm of consultants prevents us from segregating duties within our internal control ~~system.~~over ~~The~~financial ~~inadequate~~reporting ~~segregation~~during ~~of duties is a weakness because it could lead to~~ the ~~untimely~~quarterly ~~identification~~period ~~and~~covered ~~resolution~~by ofthis ~~accounting~~report ~~and~~that ~~disclosure~~have ~~matters~~materially affected, or ~~could~~are ~~lead~~reasonably tolikely ~~a failure~~ to ~~perform~~materially ~~timely and effective reviews. This may result in a failure to detect errors in spreadsheets~~affect, ~~calculations~~our orinternal ~~assumptions~~control ~~used~~over ~~to compile the~~ financial ~~statements and related disclosures as filed with the SEC;~~reporting.

3) Outsourcing of our accounting operations. Because there are no employees in our administration, we have outsourced all of our accounting functions to an independent firm. The employees of this firm are managed by supervisors within the firm and are not answerable to our management. This is a material weakness because it could result in a disjunction between the accounting policies adopted by our Board of Directors and the accounting practices applied by the independent firm;

4) Insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of US GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements;

5) Ineffective controls over period end financial disclosure and reporting processes.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended December 31, 2013 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting. We believe that a control system, no matter how well designed and operated, cannot provide absolute assurance that the objectives of the control system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within any company have been detected.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

~~None~~We know of no material, existing or pending legal proceedings against us, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation. There are no proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial shareholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our company.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

~~Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities~~None.

There were no unregistered securities to report which were sold or issued by the Company without the registration of these securities under the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance on exemptions from such registration requirements, within the period covered by this report, which have not been previously included in a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or a Current Report on Form 8-K.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not Applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

On April 24, 2013 the Company signed a letter of intent (LOI) with the National Academy of Science of Ukraine; National Science Centre; Kharkov Institute of Physics and Technology ("KIPT"), Kharkov, Ukraine. The project, dubbed “P-600”, will research the properties of nanocarbon contained matter (graphene) as working material for 3D printing. The project will be a partnership between the Company, Science and Production Establishment “Renewable Energy Sources and Sustainable Technologies" (“RESST”) National Science Center "KIPT" National Academy of Science of Ukraine and Institute of Solid State Physics and Material Science National Science Center "KIPT" National Academy of Science of Ukraine.

The scientific team will consist of 8 scientists (1 Prof., D.Sc, 2 PhD’s; 3 former weapons scientists and 2 PhD students). The expertise of the team will include the fields of nanotechnology, 3D printing, solid state physics, physical materials and thermal physics.

On October 1, 2013 all requisite approvals were granted and the project, dubbed P-600, went live. The project is fully funded for one year with an option for further collaboration. The Company will retain all intellectual property (IP) rights as well as any patents filed from the project. The Company and the Institute will be working under the auspices of the Science & Technology Centre in Ukraine (“STCU”), which is an intergovernmental organization founded by the governments of the Ukraine, Canada, EU and the USA which supports research and development activities for peaceful applications by Ukrainian, Georgian, Uzbekistani, Azerbaijani, and Moldovan scientists and engineers.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Number	Description
Exhibit Number	Description
(3)	Articles of Incorporation; Bylaws
3.1	Articles of Incorporation	Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on August 4, 2010.
3.1 (i)	Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation as filed with the State of Nevada on July 12, 2012	Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on July 13, 2012.
3.2	Bylaws	Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed on August 4, 2010.
10.1	Release entered into by Fabio Alexandre Narita	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 2012.
(10)	Material Contracts
10.2	Share Purchase Agreement between Rick Walchuk and Fabio Alexandre Narita	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 2012.
10.1	Share Purchase Agreement between Rick Walchuk and Fabio Alexandre Narita	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 29, 2012.
10.3	Subscription Agreement dated August 29, 2012.	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 11, 2012.
10.2	Patent and Technology License Agreement between our company and Cheap Tubes, Inc. dated December 3, 2012	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 18, 2012.
10.4	Form of Subscription Agreement	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 11, 2012.
10.3	Schedule 2 to the Patent and Technology License Agreement between our company and Cheap Tubes, Inc.	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC on February 5, 2013.
10.5	Form of Subscription Agreement for Draw Down	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 11, 2012.
10.4	Consulting agreement with Robert Mintak dated July 30, 2012	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC on February 5, 2013.
10.6	Patent and Technology License Agreement between the Company and Cheap Tubes, Inc. dated December 3, 2012	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 18, 2012.
10.5	Consulting agreement with Jason Dussault dated July 30, 2012	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC on February 5, 2013.
10.7	Schedule 2 to the Patent and Technology License Agreement between the Company and Cheap Tubes, Inc.	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC on February 5, 2013.
10.6	Consulting Agreement between our company and Rick Walchuk	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC on February 5, 2013.
10.7	Form of Private Placement Units Subscription Agreement	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 16, 2013.
10.8	Agency Agreement between our company and Palladium Capital Advisors LLC.	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 16, 2013.
10.9	Form of Securities Purchase Agreement	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 16, 2013.
10.10	Form of Warrant	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 16, 2013.
10.11	Subscription Agreement between our company and Big North Graphite Corp.	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 16, 2013.
10.12	Consulting Agreement between our company and Con Anast	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 17, 2013
10.13	P-600 Partner Project Agreement dated October 1, 2013	Incorporated by reference to our Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on February 13, 2014
10.14	P-600 Project Intellectual Property Agreement executed October 17, 2013	Incorporated by reference to our Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on February 13, 2014
10.15	Form of Securities Purchase Agreement	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 18, 2014
10.16	Form of Warrant	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 18, 2014
10.17	Form of Waiver and Consent	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 18, 2014
10.18	Consulting Agreement with Verge Consulting, LLC	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 18, 2014
(21)	Subsidiaries of the Registrant
21.1	9311-2571 Québec Inc., a Quebec, Canada corporation (wholly owned)
(31)	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed Herewith
(32)	Section 1350 Certifications
32.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed Herewith
101	Interactive Data File (Form 10-Q for the three months ended September 30, 2014 furnished in XBRL).
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document	*
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema	*
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase	*
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase	*
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase	*
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase	*

10.8	Consulting agreement dated July 30, 2012	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC on February 5, 2013.
10.9	Consulting agreement dated July 30, 2012	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC on February 5, 2013.
10.10	Financing Agreement dated August 29, 2012	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC on February 5, 2013.
10.11	Consulting Agreement between the Company and Rick Walchuk	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC on February 5, 2013.
10.12	Agreement between the Company and Rosevale Capital S.A	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC on April 24, 2013.
10.13	Agency Agreement between the Company and Carter Terry	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 19, 2013.
10.14	Form of Private Placement Units Subscription Agreement	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 16, 2013.
10.15	Agency Agreement between the Company and Palladium Capital Advisors LLC.	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 16, 2013.
10.16	Form of Securities Purchase Agreement	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 16, 2013.
10.17	Form of Warrant	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 16, 2013.
10.18	Subscription Agreement between the Company and Big North Graphite Corp.	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 16, 2013.
10.19	Consulting Agreement between the Company and Con Anast	Incorporated by reference to our Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 17, 2013
10.20	P-600 Partner Project Agreement dated October 1, 2013	Filed herewith
10.21	P-600 Project Intellectual Property Agreement executed October 17, 2013	Filed herewith
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed Herewith

* To be filed by Amendment.

31.2	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed Herewith
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002	Filed Herewith
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document	Filed herewith
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema	Filed herewith
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase	Filed herewith
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase	Filed herewith
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase	Filed herewith
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase	Filed herewith

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		AMERICAN GRAPHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC.
Date:	~~February~~November 1319, 2014	By:	/s/ ~~Rick~~Con ~~Walchuk~~Evan Anast
		Name:	~~Rick~~Con ~~Walchuk~~Evan Anast
		Title:	President, Chief Executive Officer, ~~President,~~ Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, Secretary and Director (Principal Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Filing Compare · AMERICAN GRAPHITE TECHNOLOGIES INC.