UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

~~WASHINGTON~~Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

~~THE~~For ~~SECURITIES~~the ~~EXCHANGE~~fiscal ~~ACT~~year OFended ~~1934~~October 31, 2013

~~For~~o ~~the~~TRANSITION ~~fiscal~~REPORT ~~year~~PURSUANT ~~ended~~TO ~~October~~SECTION ~~31,~~13 ~~2012~~OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

~~Commission~~For ~~File~~the ~~No.~~transition ~~000-54298~~period from ___________ to ___________

~~MASCOT~~Commission ~~VENTURES~~file ~~INC.~~number 000-54298

eMONEco, Inc.

f/k/a Mascot Ventures, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada		2680-~~1240056~~0818756
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
(State of incorporation)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

1802 North Carson Street, Suite 212


4745 W. 136th Street Leawood, KS		66224
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

~~Carson City, Nevada 89701~~913-871-4336

(Address of principal executive offices, zip code)

(646) 520-7426

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

~~(Former~~Securities ~~name,~~registered ~~former~~pursuant ~~address~~to ~~and~~Section ~~former~~12(b) ~~fiscal~~of ~~year,~~the Act: None

ifSecurities ~~changed~~registered ~~since~~pursuant ~~last~~to ~~report~~Section 12(g) of the Act: None

~~Securities~~Indicate ~~registered~~by ~~pursuant~~check tomark ~~Section~~whether ~~12(b)~~the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act:. Yes o No x

~~None~~Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x

~~Securities~~Indicate ~~registered~~by ~~pursuant~~check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to ~~section~~be 12filed by Section 13 or 15(gd) of the Securities Exchange Act: of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant as required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

~~Common~~Indicate ~~Stock~~by check mark whether registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, $if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.~~001~~405 ~~par~~of ~~value~~this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files) Yes [ ] No [ x]

~~Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x~~1

Indicate by check mark if ~~the~~disclosure ~~registrant~~of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not ~~required~~contained toherein, ~~file~~and ~~reports~~will ~~pursuant~~not be contained, to ~~Section~~the 13best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or ~~Section~~information ~~15(d)~~statements incorporated by reference in Part III of ~~the~~this ~~Act~~Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ~~Yes ¨ No x~~[ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant ~~(1)~~is ~~has~~a ~~filed~~large ~~all~~accelerated ~~reports~~filer, ~~required~~an toaccelerated befiler, ~~filed~~a bynon-accelerated ~~Section~~filer, 13 or ~~15(d)~~a ofsmaller ~~the~~reporting ~~Securities~~company. ~~Exchange~~See ~~Act of 1934 during~~ the ~~preceding~~definitions 12of ~~months~~“large ~~(or~~accelerated ~~for~~filer," ~~such~~“accelerated ~~shorter~~filer” ~~period~~and ~~that~~“smaller ~~the~~reporting ~~registrant~~company” ~~was~~in ~~required~~Rule ~~to file such reports), and (~~12b-2) ~~has~~of ~~been subject to such filing requirements for~~ the ~~past~~Exchange ~~90 days~~Act. ~~Yes x No ¨~~

~~Indicate~~Large byaccelerated ~~check~~filer ~~mark~~[ ~~whether~~] ~~the~~Accelerated ~~registrant~~filer ~~has~~[ ~~submitted~~] ~~electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S~~Non-Taccelerated ~~during~~filer ~~the~~[ ~~preceding~~] 12Smaller ~~months~~reporting ~~(or~~company ~~for~~[ ~~such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files) Yes ¨ No~~ x ]

Indicate by check mark ifwhether ~~disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to~~ the ~~best of~~ registrant’s ~~knowledge,~~is ina ~~definitive~~shell ~~proxy~~company or(as ~~information~~defined ~~statements incorporated by reference~~ in ~~Part~~Rule ~~III~~12b-2 of ~~this~~the ~~Form~~Act) ~~10-K~~Yes or[ ~~any~~] ~~amendment~~No to[ ~~this~~x] ~~Form 10-K. ¨~~

~~Indicate~~As byof ~~check~~February ~~mark~~12 ~~whether~~2014, the registrant ishad ~~a large accelerated filer~~262, ~~an accelerated filer~~513,329 ashares ~~non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions~~ of ~~“large~~common ~~accelerated~~stock ~~filer,”~~issued ~~“accelerated filer”~~ and ~~“smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act~~outstanding. ~~(Check one):~~

~~Large~~State ~~accelerated~~the ~~filer~~aggregate ¨market ~~Accelerated~~value ~~filer~~of othe ~~Non~~voting and non-~~accelerated~~voting ~~filer~~common oequity ~~Smaller~~held ~~reporting~~by ~~company~~non-affiliates xcomputed ~~(Do~~by ~~not~~reference ~~check~~to ifthe aprice ~~smaller~~at ~~reporting~~which ~~company)~~the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: $2,790,009.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No ¨

At April 30, 2012, the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant (without admitting that any person whose shares are not included in such calculation is an affiliate) was approximately $186,000. At December 31, 2012 and January 21, 2013, there were 11,860,000 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding. At October 31, 2012, the end of the Registrant’s most recently completed fiscal year, there were 11,860,000 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, outstanding.

MASCOT VENTURES INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page No.
	PART I
Item 1.	Business		4
Item 1A.	Risk Factors		11
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments		11
Item 2.	Properties		11
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings		11
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures		11
	PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities		12
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data		13
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		13
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		14
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data		16
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure		24
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures		24
Item 9B.	Other Information		25
	Part III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance		26
Item 11.	Executive Compensation		28
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters		29
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence		30
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services		30
	Part IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules		31
	Signatures		32

~~FORWARD-LOOKING~~TABLE ~~STATEMENTS~~OF CONTENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K of Mascot Ventures Inc., a Nevada corporation, contains “forward-looking statements,” as defined in the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “expects”, “plans”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential” or “continue” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements about our market opportunity, our strategies, competition, expected activities and expenditures as we pursue our business plan, and the adequacy of our available cash resources. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Actual results may differ materially from the predictions discussed in these forward-looking statements. The economic environment within which we operate could materially affect our actual results. Additional factors that could materially affect these forward-looking statements and/or predictions include, among other things: the volatility of minerals prices, the possibility that exploration efforts will not yield economically recoverable quantities of minerals, accidents and other risks associated with mineral exploration and development operations, the risk that the Company will encounter unanticipated geological factors, the Company’s need for and ability to obtain additional financing, the possibility that the Company may not be able to secure permitting and other governmental clearances necessary to carry out the Company’s exploration and development plans, the exercise of the approximately 84.2% control the Company’s two officers and directors collectively hold of the Company’s voting securities, other factors over which we have little or no control; and other factors discussed in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).


PART 1

ITEM 1	Description of Business	4
ITEM 1A	Risk Factors	6
1TEM 1B	Unresolved Staff Comments	6
ITEM 2	Properties	6
ITEM 3	Legal Proceedings	6
ITEM 4	Mine Safety Disclosures.	6

PART II

ITEM 5	Market for Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.	6
ITEM 6	Selected Financial Data	7
ITEM 7	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	7
ITEM 7A	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	9
ITEM 8	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	10
ITEM 9	Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	20
ITEM 9A	Controls and Procedures	20

PART III

ITEM 10	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	21

Our management has included projections and estimates in this Form 10-K, which are based primarily on management’s experience in the industry, assessments of our results of operations, discussions and negotiations with third parties and a review of information filed by our competitors with the SEC or otherwise publicly available. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. We disclaim any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

ITEM 11	Executive Compensation	23
ITEM 12	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	23
ITEM 13	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence	24
ITEM 14	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	25

PART IV

ITEM 15	Exhibit, Financial Statement Schedules.	26

All references in this Form 10-K to the ”Company”, “Mascot Ventures Inc.”, “we”, “us,” or “our” are to Mascot Ventures Inc.

PART I

~~ITEM~~Item 1. ~~BUSINESS~~Description of Business

~~ORGANIZATION~~FORWARD-LOOKING ~~WITHIN THE LAST FIVE YEARS~~STATEMENTS

OnThis ~~September~~annual 25report contains forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. These statements often can be identified by the use of terms such as "may," ~~2007~~"will," "expect," "believe," "anticipate," "estimate," "approximate" or "continue," or the ~~Company~~negative ~~was~~thereof. ~~incorporated~~We ~~under~~intend that such forward-looking statements be subject to the ~~laws~~safe harbors for such statements. We wish to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the ~~State~~date made. Any forward-looking statements represent management's best judgment as to what may occur in the future. However, forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and important factors beyond our control that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from historical results of ~~Nevada~~operations and events and those presently anticipated or projected. We ~~are~~disclaim ~~engaged~~any inobligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the ~~business~~date of ~~acquisition,~~such ~~exploration~~statement ~~and~~or ~~development~~to reflect the occurrence of ~~natural~~anticipated ~~resource~~or ~~properties~~unanticipated events.

Wendy Wildmen has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer, and Treasurer, from October 3, 2007 until the current date. Our board of directors is comprised of two persons: Ms. Wildmen and Clive Hope.General

WeeMONEco, ~~are~~Inc. ~~authorized~~(hereinunder to“we,” ~~issue~~“the ~~75,000,000~~Company” ~~shares~~or “the Registrant”) was incorporated in the State of ~~common~~Nevada ~~stock~~on September 25, ~~par~~2007 ~~value~~as ~~$.001~~Mascot ~~per~~Ventures, ~~share~~Inc. Into ~~October~~engage ~~2007~~in wethe ~~issued 5~~acquisition,~~000,000~~ ~~shares~~exploration and development of ~~common~~natural ~~stock~~resource toproperties. The ~~each~~Company ofis ~~our~~in ~~two~~the ~~directors,~~exploration ~~for~~stage anwith ~~aggregate~~no ~~issuance~~revenues ofand 10limited operating history. On December 23,~~000~~ 2013,~~000~~ ~~shares. Said~~the ~~issuances~~Company ~~were~~changed ~~paid~~its atname ato ~~purchase~~eMONEco, ~~price~~Inc. ofto better reflect the ~~par~~business ~~value~~of ~~$.001~~mobile ~~per~~payments, ~~share~~remittance, orbanking aand ~~total~~commerce derived from the licensing of ~~$10~~certain rights and technology granted by JBD Consulting,~~000~~ LLC signed on April 15, 2013 (the “MONE Licensing Agreement”).

INOn ~~GENERAL~~December 16, 2013, the Registrant filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Articles of Incorporation (“Certificate”) with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada to increase the number of shares of authorized capital of the Company from 75,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, to 500,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share. The amendment was approved by the officers and directors of the Registrant in accordance with the laws of the state of Nevada. On November 25, 2013, the Board of Directors approved a dividend equal to 13 shares for each 1 share held at that time. The effect of the dividend was a forward split of 13:1, which was deemed effective on December 23, 2013 along with the name change which had been approved by the shareholder on April 17, 2013 as duly noted in the Form 14C filed by the Registrant on August 9, 2013. The name change and the forward split were 2 of several conditions for closing the MONE Licensing Agreement. As the dividend originally proposed was 2:1, upon further analysis by the Board of Directors, the dividend was adjusted to 13:1 to better reflect the capital strategy as several months had passed since the original execution of the MONE Licensing Agreement. The Board’s decision in no way undermined the purpose and intent of the contract and the change in dividend was approved by the principals of JBD Consulting, LLC.

We are an exploration stage company engaged in the acquisition and exploration of mineral properties. We currently own a 100% undivided interest in the Monty Lode Claim located in Clark County, State of Nevada, that we call the “Monty Lode Property.” We are currently conducting mineral exploration activities on the Monty Lode Property in order to assess whether it contains any commercially exploitable mineral reserves. Currently there are no known mineral reserves on the Monty Lode Property.

We have not earned any revenues to date. Our independent auditor has issued an audit opinion which includes a statement expressing substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. The source of information contained in this discussion is our geology report prepared by Laurence Sookochoff, P. Eng., dated September 23, 2009.

There is the likelihood of our mineral claim containing little or no economic mineralization or reserves of silver and other minerals. We are presently in the exploration stage of our business and we can provide no assurance that any commercially viable mineral deposits exist on our mineral claims, that we will discover commercially exploitable levels of mineral resources on our property, or, if such deposits are discovered, that we will enter into further substantial exploration programs. Further exploration is required before a final determination can be made as to whether our mineral claims possess commercially exploitable mineral deposits. If our claim does not contain any reserves all funds that we spend on exploration will be lost.

~~ACQUISITION~~We OFare ~~THE~~a ~~MONTY~~development-stage ~~LODE~~company. ~~PROPERTY~~To date we have not generated any revenue. Since the signing of the MONE Licensing Agreement and the appointment of Donald E. Latson to the Board of Directors on April 16, 2013, the Company has been engaged in operation related to the research and development of the mobile payments, remittance, banking, and commerce software, developing marketing strategies and recruiting telecom providers, banks, and other third party partners for the development of the business based on the MONE Licensing Agreement.

~~On September 23, 2009, we purchased a 100% undivided interest in a mineral claim known as the Monty Lode Claim for a price of $6,500. The claims are in good standing until September 1, 2013.~~Product

WeMobile ~~engaged~~Monē ~~Laurence~~or ~~Sookochoff, P~~MobileMone.com ~~Eng.,~~is ~~to prepare~~ a ~~geological~~comprehensive ~~evaluation~~prepaid ~~report~~financial onservices ~~the~~product ~~Monty~~suite ~~Lode~~available ~~Property. Mr. Sookochoff is a consulting professional geologist~~ in the ~~Geological~~market ~~Section~~today, ofcombining ~~the~~all ~~Association~~five of(5) ~~Professional Engineers and Geoscientists~~ of ~~British Columbia. Mr. Sookochoff attended~~ the ~~University~~most ofrequested ~~British~~financial ~~Columbia~~services ~~and~~in ~~holds~~ a ~~Bachelor~~single ~~of Science degree in geology.~~product:

~~The~~ - ~~work~~Banked ~~completed~~Solutions ~~by Mr. Sookochoff in preparing the geological report consisted of a review of geological data from previous exploration within the region. The acquisition of this data involved the research~~ and ~~investigation of historical files to locate and retrieve data information acquired by previous exploration companies in the area of the mineral claims.~~Enhancements

We - ~~received~~Under-banked the geological evaluation report on the Monty Lode Property entitled “Geological Evaluation Report on the Monty Lode Mining Claim, Yellow Pine Mining District, Clark County, Nevada, USA” prepared by Mr. Sookochoff on September 23, 2009. The geological report summarizes the results of the history of the exploration of the mineral claims, the regional and ~~local~~Unbanked geology of the mineral claims and the mineralization and the geological formations identified as a result of the prior exploration. The geological report also gives conclusions regarding potential mineralization of the mineral claims and recommends a further geological exploration program on the mineral claims. The description of the Monty Lode Property provided below is based on Mr. Sookochoff’s report.Services

~~DESCRIPTION~~ - OFPerson-to-Person ~~PROPERTY~~Services

~~The~~ - property owned by Mascot Ventures is the Monty Lode Claim which is comprised of one located mineral claim. The Monty Lode Claim is located within Township 25S, Range 58E, Sections 28 & 33 in the Yellow Pine Mining District of Clark County Nevada. Access from Las Vegas, Nevada Account-to-Account ~~the~~Transfer Monty Lode Claim is southward via Interstate Highway 15 for approximately 31 miles, to within five miles past Jean, Nevada, and then westerly for seven miles to the Monty Lode Claim. The entire distance from Las Vegas to the Monty Lode Claim is approximately 39 miles.Services

~~The~~ - ~~claim~~Merchant isNetwork ~~recorded with the Recorder’s Office in Clark County, NV and the Bureau of Land Management.~~Services

- Remittance Services

Mobile Monē innovatively integrates technology and traditional banking and financial services, Mobile Monē is a mobile commerce (m-commerce) business allowing payments and money transfers to be made through mobile phones, any mobile phone and not just smart phones.

The mobile payments (m-payments) and mobile banking (m-banking) movements are the fastest growing movements in the financial services industry. These movements open up more traditional banking and payments opportunities to current and new markets, and also introduce new highly profitable business opportunities to those who deliver these services.

Mobile Monē is an innovative alternative to traditional paper payment methods such as checks and money orders. Mobile Monē has created the world's first purely "mobile only" bank account (Mobile Monē wallet) in order to solve a growing financial service problem – a cost-effective method of delivering immediate electronic payment exchanges.

Mobile Monē is focused on user friendly, seamless mobile banking transactions. Users simply: 1) use their pre-paid card; 2) call via phone, or 3) send a message from their mobile phones to the Mobile Monē server. The server validates the transaction and transfers the funds or responds to the user's request for account information. Mobile Monē is a payment intermediary service that facilitates worldwide e-commerce and m-commerce.

Mobile Monē also performs payment processing for online vendors, and commercial users, for which it charges a fee; thus, delivering the desired benefits of contactless payment without the need to impose costly Point-of-Sale (POS) infrastructure changes.

Mobile Monē sometimes also charges a transaction fee for receiving money. The market opportunity for our technology and service is tremendous and subject to a high growth trend. The mobile payments market was projected to exceed more than $600 Billion globally in 2013. With over 200 million mobile devices in use today, in the United States alone, we are afforded an opportunity to make Mobile Monē services a “must have” service specifically designed for the segment of the market that has a well- documented need.

Network-branded prepaid cards are targeted primarily to the roughly nine (9) million so-called unbanked households in the United States, those, according to a 2009 Federal Reserve survey, without any checking or savings account. Another 21 million households are under-banked, meaning they do not have access to more advanced financial services tools (i.e. internet, voice, or mobile banking) from their banks or credit unions. Taken together, that accounts for some 60 million adults, or one-quarter of the households in the United States.

~~PHYSIOGRAPHY~~Of those households, ~~CLIMATE~~only 28% have used a prepaid card, ~~VEGETATION~~meaning &there's ~~WATER~~plenty of untapped opportunity. Most credit-card experts expect prepaid-card use to explode beyond the 20%-plus annual growth of the past five years as banks pile on charges for debit cards and checking accounts and impose hefty minimum balances on checking accounts to waive fees.

~~The~~Ninety-five ~~Monty~~percent ~~Lode~~(95%) ~~Property~~of isthe ~~situated~~targeted households in ~~Nevada, at~~ the ~~southern~~United ~~end~~States ofown ~~the~~at ~~Sheep~~least ~~Mountain~~one ~~Range~~mobile phone, acontributing ~~north-south~~to ~~trending~~the ~~range~~270 ofmillion ~~mountains~~mobile ~~with~~phone ~~peaks~~users ~~reaching~~in anthe ~~elevation~~United ofStates ~~4,184~~and ~~feet.~~an ~~The~~estimated ~~western~~3 ~~portion~~billion ofmobile ~~the~~phone ~~claim~~users ~~covers~~globally. As asuch, ~~plateau-like~~Mobile ~~area~~Monē atis anin ~~elevation~~a ofuniquely ~~1,300~~positioned ~~feet~~to ~~with~~satisfy athe ~~range~~needs of ~~elevation on~~ the ~~property~~targeted ofmarket in a ~~maximum~~highly ofinnovative ~~100~~and ~~feet~~profitable manner.

~~The~~ Mobile ~~area~~mone ishelps ofyou aembrace ~~typically~~increasing ~~desert~~demand ~~climate~~for ~~and~~Person-to-Person ~~relatively~~payments ~~high temperature~~ and ~~low~~grow ~~precipitation.~~your ~~Vegetation~~customer ~~consists~~base ~~mainly of desert shrubs~~ and ~~cactus.~~revenue ~~Sources~~outside oftraditional ~~water would be available from valley wells~~methods.

~~PROPERTY~~Mobile ~~HISTORY~~mone — the only multi-channel, P2P payments solution developed for financial institutions — lets your customers securely send money to anyone, anytime, anyplace, anywhere. Imagine the strength of your brand coupled with the power of a pioneering FDIC individually insured mobile bank account.

~~The Monty~~Item ~~Lode Property is situated in the Yellow Pine Mining District, which stems from 1856, when Mormon missionaries reported ore in the area~~1A. In Risk 1857, the smelting of ore produced approximately 9,000 pounds of lead, and in 1898, a mill was built south of Goodsprings, near the Monty Lode Property. As a result of the mill availability, exploration activity led to the discovery of many of the mines in the area. The completion of the San Pedro, Los Angeles and Salt Lake railroads in 1905 and recognition of oxidized zinc minerals in the ore in 1906 stimulated development of the mines and the region has been subject to intermittent activity up to 1964, particularly during the World War I and II years.Factors

Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

None.

Item 2. Properties.

The Company currently utilizes the services of a virtual office provider DaVinci, Inc. for which the Company pays $149 per month.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are not currently involved in any pending or threatened material litigation or other material legal proceedings, nor have we been made aware of any pending or threatened regulatory audits.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

Part II

Item 5. Market for Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Market Information

Our common shares are quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board under the symbol “EMON”. OTC Bulletin Board securities are not listed or traded on the floor of an organized national or regional stock exchange. Instead, OTC Bulletin Board securities transactions are conducted through a telephone and computer network connecting dealers in stocks. OTC Bulletin Board issuers are traditionally smaller companies that do not meet the financial and other listing requirements of a regional or national stock exchange.

There has been minimal trading during the last three fiscal years.

~~Production~~Number ~~from the mines~~ of the Yellow Pine Mining District from 1902 to 1929 was 477,717 tons. Bullion recovery from 7,656 tons of this ore by amalgamation and cyanidation was 9,497 ounces of gold and 2,445 ounces of silver. The concentrator treated 230,452 tons of ore which yielded 58,641 tons of lead-zinc concentrate and 32,742 tons of lead concentrate. Crude ore shipped to 1929 was 227,952 tons from which recovery amounted to 3,196 ounces gold, 422,379 ounces silver, 3,085,675 pounds copper, 34,655,460 pounds lead and 110,833,051 pounds zinc.Holders

~~Reported~~As ~~production~~of ~~from~~October ~~the~~31, ~~Monty~~2013, ~~Lode Property workings is included in production from~~ the ~~mines~~154,180,000 ~~within~~issued ~~the~~and ~~immediate~~outstanding ~~area~~shares of ~~the~~common ~~Monty~~stock ~~Lode~~were ~~Claim~~held ~~including~~by ~~Reported~~a ~~production~~total ~~from~~of 14 ~~the~~shareholders ~~Monty~~of ~~Lode~~record. As ~~Property workings is included in production from the mines within the immediate area~~ of the ~~Monty~~date ~~Lode Claim including production from the Christmas Mine and the Eureka Mine. The three mines reported production~~ of ~~532,505~~this ~~lb lead~~filing, ~~449,886~~the ~~lb zinc~~262, 16513,~~635~~329 ozshares ~~silver,~~were 2held ozby ~~gold~~a ~~and~~total ~~195~~of lb12 ~~copper~~shareholders.

~~REGIONAL GEOLOGY~~Dividends

InWe ~~the~~have ~~Yellow~~not ~~Pine~~declared ~~district,~~or ~~the~~paid ~~Spring~~dividends ~~Mountain~~on ~~Range~~our incommon ~~the~~stock ~~west,~~nor ~~and~~do ~~the~~we ~~Sheep~~anticipate ~~Mountain~~paying ~~Range~~dividends in the ~~east~~foreseeable ~~consist~~future. Declaration ~~maily~~or payment of ~~Paleozoic~~dividends, ~~sediments~~if ~~which~~any, ~~have~~in ~~undergone~~the ~~intense~~future, ~~folding~~will ~~accompanied~~be byat ~~faulting. A~~the ~~series~~discretion of ~~Carnoniferous~~our ~~sediments~~board ~~consist largely~~ of ~~siliceous~~directors ~~limestones~~ and ~~include~~will ~~strata~~depend ofon ~~pure~~our ~~crystalline~~then ~~limestone~~current ~~and~~financial ~~dolomite~~condition, ~~with~~results ~~occasional intercalated beds~~ of ~~fine~~operations, ~~grained~~capital ~~sandstone.~~requirements ~~These~~and ~~strata~~other ~~have~~factors adeemed ~~general~~relevant ~~west~~by tothe ~~southwest~~board ~~dip~~ of ~~from 15 to 45 degrees which is occasionally disturbed by local folds~~directors. ~~Igneous~~There ~~rocks~~ are ~~scarce~~no ~~and~~contractual ~~are~~restrictions ~~represented~~on ~~chiefly~~our byability ~~quartz-monzonite~~to ~~porphyry~~declare ~~dikes~~or ~~and~~pay ~~sills~~dividends. ~~The quartz-monzonite porphyry is intruded into these strata and is of post-Jurassic age, perhaps Tertiary.~~

~~STRATIGRAPHY~~Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans

~~The~~We ~~sedimentary~~have ~~rocks~~no incompensation ~~the~~plans ~~district~~(including ~~range~~individual incompensation ~~age~~arrangements) ~~from~~under ~~Upper~~which ~~Cambrian~~our toequity ~~Recent.~~securities ~~The~~are ~~Paleozoic~~authorized ~~section~~for includes the Cambrian Bonanza King and Nopah Formations, the Devonian Sultan, Mississippian Monte Cristo Limestone, Pennsylvanian/Mississippian Bird Spring Formation and Permina Kaibab Limestone (Carr, 1987)issuance.

~~The~~Recent ~~Mesozoic~~Sales ~~section is comprised only~~ of ~~the~~Unregistered Trissic Moenkopi and Chinle Formations and an upper Mesozoic unit of uncertain age termed the Lavinia Wash Formation. The Paleozoic rocks are dominantly carbonates while the Mesozoic units are continental clastics. Tertiary rocks include gravels and minor volcanic tuffs.Securities

Only two varieties of intrusive rocks are known in the district. The most abundant is granite porphyry which forms three large sill-like masses (Hewett, 1931). The sills generally lie near major thrust faults and are thought to have been emplaced along breccia zones at the base of the upper plate of the thrust fault. Locally, small dikes of basaltic composition and uncertain age have been encountered in some of the mine workings.

STRUCTURE

The region reveals an amazing record of folding, thrust faulting and normal faultings. Folding began in the early Jurassic, resulting in broad flexures in the more massive units and tight folds in the thinly bedded rocks. The thrust faults in the district are part of a belt of thrust faulted rocks, the Foreland Fold and Thrust Belt that stretches from southern Canada to southern California. Deformation within this belt began in the Jurassic and continued until Cretaceous time. Within the Goodsprings District thrust faulting appears to post-date much of the folding, but despite intensive study the actual age of thrusting continues to be the subject of contentious debate. Three major thrusts have been mapped; from west to east, the Green Monster, Keystone and Contact thrusts.

Of these, the Keystone is the most persistent along strike having been mapped for a distance of over 50 kilometers. The stratigraphic relationships along the Keystone fault are similar to those for all the major thrusts in the area. The Cambrian Bonanza King Formation has been thrust eastward over younter Paleozoic rocks.

PROPERTY GEOLOGY

The Monty Lode Claim covers some former exploratory workings which explored mineralization hosted by a breccia zone parallel to bedding in the Bird Spring Formation.

REGIONAL MINERALIZATION

It is reported (Albritton, 1954) that ore deposits in the Goodsprings (Yellow Pine) district can at best be characterized as enigmatic. They appear to fall into two distinct types, which may or may not be related, gold-copper deposits and lead-zinc deposits. Gold-copper deposits are clearly related to sill-like masses of granite porphyry. All existing mines worked the contact between the intrusive and surrounding sedimentary rock. Gold occurred in both the instrusive and the carbonate wall rocks. It appears any carbonate unit was a suitable host.

The lead-zinc deposits are often distant from the intrusives and occur as veins or replacements of brecciated rocks along fault zones, either thrust faults or normal faults. Unlike the gold deposits, the productive lead-zinc deposits are restricted to the Monte Cristo Formation.

Mineralogy of gold-copper deposits consists of native gold, pyrite, limonite, cinnabar, malachite, azurite and chrysocolla. Lead-zinc deposits are comprised of hydrozincite, calamine, smithsonite, cerrusite, anglesite, galena and iron oxides. The rather unusual mineralogy of the district is due to the great depth of surface oxidation; exceeding 600 feet.

ORE MINERALOGY AND ALTERATION

Typical sulfides such as chalcopyrite, sphalerite and pyrite have been partially or completely altered to more stable hydrated carbonates and sulfates. Only the highly insoluble lead sulfide, galena has successfully resisted surface oxidation.

Primary alteration is difficult to characterize due to the supergene overprint, but again appears to differ for gold-copper deposits and lead-zinc deposits. Gold-copper ores have been extensively sericitized and kaolinized, alterning the host pluton to a rock that can be mined through simple excavation with little or no blasting. The rock is so thoroughly altered it decrepitates on exposure to the atmosphere. On the other hand, lead-zinc deposits appear to be characterized by dolomization and minor silicification.

PROPERTY MINERALIZATION

The workings on the Monty Lode Claim reveal silver/lead/zinc mineralization with vanadinite and cuprodescloizite in a limesone breccia zone parallel to bedding in the Bird Spring Formation. Gold is also reported.

PRESENT PROPERTY CONDITION AND PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS

The Monty Lode Property has no plant and equipment, infrastructure or other facilities, and there is currently no exploration of the Monty Lode Property. We have incurred $147,324 in operating costs, which sum includes $240 of exploration expenditures, as at October 31, 2012. We expect to incur $94,000 of exploration costs to complete Phases 1, 2 and 3 of our Plan of Operation, with Phase 3 being Positive areas of the Monty Lode Property being diamond drill tested. There is no source of power or water on the Monty Lode Property that can be utilized.

A yearly maintenance fee of $140 is required to be paid to the Bureau of Land Management prior to the expiry date to keep the claim in good standing for an additional year. No other permits are required for us to perform the exploration activities on the Monty Lode Property.

CONDITIONS TO RETAIN TITLE TO THE CLAIM

State and Federal regulations require a yearly maintenance fee to keep the claim in good standing. In accordance with Federal regulations, the Monty Lode Claim is in good standing to September 1, 2013. A yearly maintenance fee of $140 is required to be paid to the Bureau of Land Management prior to the expiry date to keep the claim in good standing for an additional year.

COMPETITIVE CONDITIONS

The mineral exploration business is an extremely competitive industry. We are competing with many other exploration companies looking for minerals. We are a very early stage mineral exploration company and a very small participant in the mineral exploration business. Being a junior mineral exploration company, we compete with other companies like ours for financing and joint venture partners. Additionally, we compete for resources such as professional geologists, camp staff, helicopters and mineral exploration supplies.

GOVERNMENT APPROVALS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

We will be required to comply with all regulations, rules and directives of governmental authorities and agencies applicable to the exploration of minerals in USA generally, and in Nevada specifically.

COSTS AND EFFECTS OF COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS

We currently have no costs to comply with environmental laws concerning our exploration program. We will also have to sustain the cost of reclamation and environmental remediation for all work undertaken which causes sufficient surface disturbance to necessitate reclamation work. Both reclamation and environmental remediation refer to putting disturbed ground back as close to its original state as possible. Other potential pollution or damage must be cleaned-up and renewed along standard guidelines outlined in the usual permits. Reclamation is the process of bringing the land back to a natural state after completion of exploration activities. Environmental remediation refers to the physical activity of taking steps to remediate, or remedy, any environmental damage caused, i.e. refilling trenches after sampling or cleaning up fuel spills. Our initial programs do not require any reclamation or remediation other than minor clean up and removal of supplies because of minimal disturbance to the ground. The amount of these costs is not known at this time as we do not know the extent of the exploration program we will undertake, beyond completion of the recommended three phases described above. Because there is presently no information on the size, tenor, or quality of any resource or reserve at this time, it is impossible to assess the impact of any capital expenditures on our earnings or competitive position in the event a potentially economic deposit is discovered.

EMPLOYEES

We currently have no employees other than our directors. We intend to retain the services of geologists, prospectors and consultants on a contract basis to conduct the exploration programs on our mineral claims and to assist with regulatory compliance and preparation of financial statements.

OUR EXECUTIVE OFFICES

Our executive offices are located at 1802 North Carson Street, Suite 212, Carson City, Nevada 89701.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

As a “smaller reporting company,” as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, we are not required to provide the information called for by this Item.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

~~ITEM~~Use 2.of ~~PROPERTIES~~Proceeds of Registered Securities.

~~Our~~There ~~current~~were ~~business~~no ~~address~~sales isor ~~1802~~proceeds ~~North~~during ~~Carson~~the ~~Street,~~calendar ~~Suite~~year ~~212,~~ended ~~Carson~~October ~~City~~31, ~~Nevada~~2013, ~~89701. Our~~for ~~telephone~~the ~~number~~sale isof ~~(646)~~registered ~~520-7426~~securities.

WePurchases ~~believe~~of ~~that~~Equity ~~this space is adequate for our current needs~~Securities.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not currently involved in any legal proceedings and we are not aware of any pending or potential legal actions.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None.

11Item 6. Selected Financial Data

~~PART~~Not IIapplicable to smaller reporting companies..

~~ITEM~~Item 57. ~~MARKET~~Management's ~~FOR~~Discussion ~~REGISTRANT’S~~and ~~COMMON~~Analysis ~~EQUITY~~of ~~AND~~Financial ~~RELATED~~Condition ~~STOCKHOLDER~~and ~~MATTERS~~Results ~~MARKET~~of ~~INFORMATION~~Operations.

~~Since~~Certain ~~March~~statements 30contained in this Annual Report, ~~2011~~including statements regarding the anticipated development and expansion of our business, our ~~shares~~intent, ofbelief ~~common~~or ~~stock~~current ~~have~~expectations, ~~been~~primarily ~~quoted~~with onrespect ~~the~~to ~~OTC~~our ~~Bulletin~~future ~~Board~~operating performance and ~~the~~other ~~OTCQB~~statements ~~tier~~contained ofherein ~~OTC~~regarding ~~Markets,~~matters ~~under~~that ~~the~~are ~~stock~~not ~~symbol~~historical ~~“MCTV~~facts, are "forward-looking" statements.~~” The~~ ~~following~~Future ~~table~~filings ~~shows~~with the ~~reported~~SEC, ~~high~~future press releases and ~~low~~future ~~closing~~oral ~~bid~~or ~~prices~~written ~~per~~statements ~~share~~made ~~for~~by us or with our ~~common~~approval, ~~stock~~which ~~based~~are onnot ~~information~~statements ~~provided~~of historical fact, may contain forward-looking statements, because such statements include risks and uncertainties, and actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied by ~~the~~such ~~OTCQB~~forward-looking statements. ~~The~~ ~~over~~All forward-~~the-counter~~looking ~~market~~statements ~~quotations~~speak ~~set~~only ~~forth~~as ~~for~~of ~~our~~the ~~common~~date ~~stock~~on which they are made and reflect ~~inter-dealer~~our ~~prices~~plans, ~~without~~estimates ~~retail~~and ~~mark-up,~~beliefs. ~~mark~~Our actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-~~down~~looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update such statements to reflect events that occur or ~~commission~~circumstances that exist after the date on which they are made. The following discussion and ~~may~~analysis ~~not~~should ~~necessarily~~be ~~represent~~read ~~actual~~in ~~transactions~~conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

	BID PRICE PER SHARE
	HIGH		LOW
Three Months Ended October 31, 2012	$	0.00	$	0.00
Three Months Ended July 31, 2012	$	0.00	$	0.00
Three Months Ended April 30, 2012	$	0.00	$	0.00
Three Months Ended January 31, 2012	$	0.00	$	0.00
Three Months Ended October 31, 2011	$	0.00	$	0.00
Three Months Ended July 31, 2011	$	0.00	$	0.00
Three Months Ended April 30, 2011	$	0.00	$	0.00

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements, including the notes thereto, appearing elsewhere in this annual report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward looking statements. Our audited financial statements are stated in United States Dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

~~HOLDERS~~7

AsPLAN ofOF ~~October 31, 2012, and as of the date of this report, the Company had 11,860,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding held by 11 holders of record.~~OPERATION

~~TRANSFER~~As ~~AGENT~~of April 15, 2013, when the Company entered into a Reorganization and Exclusive Sponsorship Licensing Agreement with JBD Consulting LLC and Mobile Mone, Inc. (the “Licensing Agreement”), as detailed in the Form 8-K filed on April 17, 2013, we have abandoned previous plans to exploration of our mineral rights claims. Pursuant to the Licensing Agreement, we intend to begin operations as an exclusive provider of mobile payments, remittance, banking, and commerce services under the license of JBD Consulting LLC. The Mobile Mone product allows participants to utilize mobile telephone technology to transfer and exchange money via any Internet connected device, standard phone line, email, or SMS text messaging system. Our revenues will be derived on a commission basis duly scheduled in the Licensing Agreement.

~~Our~~The ~~transfer~~conditions ~~agent~~precedent isto ~~Empire~~the ~~Stock~~closing ~~Transfer~~ of ~~Henderson,~~the ~~Nevada. Their~~Licensing ~~address~~Agreement ishave ~~1859~~not ~~Whitney~~been ~~Mesa~~met Drand thus the Licensing Agreement is not yet effective. However, ~~Henderson,~~management ~~Nevada~~has ~~89014~~continued operations in developing the software and ~~their~~marketing ~~telephone~~to ~~number~~venders isand ~~(702)~~service ~~818-5898~~providers.

~~DIVIDENDS~~Over the next twelve months we intend to build our operations and staff to implement our long term goals. As we have failed to secure financing to implement our full operations, little has changed since our last quarterly report beyond expenses and product development. We are currently engaging key personnel in compliance, marketing and software development. Over the 40-45 days following closing of the Licensing Agreement, we plan on staffing our sales team with National, Regional, and Local sales representatives as well as support staff and territorially based strategic partners. We expect to close the Licensing Agreement before the end of the 1st quarter of 2014.

~~Historically,~~We weexpect ~~have~~to ~~not~~begin ~~paid~~utilizing ~~any~~our ~~dividends~~sales tostaff ~~the~~immediately ~~holders~~and ofsee ~~our~~real ~~common~~sales ~~stock~~revenues ~~and~~within we13-14 doweeks ~~not~~and ~~expect~~begin tohitting ~~pay~~long ~~any~~term ~~such~~projection ~~dividends~~goals inby the ~~foreseeable~~24th ~~future~~week asof operation. During this time we ~~expect~~will begin to ~~retain~~scale our ~~future~~marketing ~~earnings~~material, ~~for~~training ~~use~~programs inand ~~the~~resource ~~operation~~centers ~~and~~for ~~expansion~~staff ofand ~~our~~potential ~~business.~~clients alike

RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

None.

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS

We have not established any compensation plans under which equity securities are authorized for issuance.

PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE REGISTRANT AND AFFILIATED PURCHASERS

We did not purchase any of our shares of common stock or other securities during the year ended October 31, 2012.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

As a “smaller reporting company,” as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act, we are not required to provide the information called for by this Item.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

WeThe ~~have~~twelve ~~generated~~months noended ~~revenues since inception and have incurred $193,373 in operating expenses from inception through~~ October 31, ~~2012.~~2013 ~~These expenses were comprised of $91,500 in management fees~~ and ~~rent and $101~~2012,~~873~~ ~~in general~~ and ~~administrative costs. We incurred net loss of $46,049 and $42,469 for~~ the ~~years~~period ~~ended~~from ~~October 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Our net loss since inception (~~September 25, 2007 (Inception) ~~through~~to October 31, ~~2012 was $192,461. The following table provides selected financial data about our company for the years ended October 31, 2012 and 2011.~~2013

Balance Sheet Data	October 31, 2012			October 31, 2011
Cash and Cash Equivalents	$	5		$	22,938
Total Assets	$	6,505		$	29,438
Total Liabilities	$	56,966		$	51,850
Shareholders’ Equity (Deficit)	$	(50,461	)	$	(22,412	)

We recorded no revenues for the twelve months ended October 31, 2013 and 2012. From the period of September 25, 2007 (inception) to October 31, 2013, we recorded no revenues.

~~GOING~~For ~~CONCERN~~the twelve months ending October 31, 2013, impairment loss was $6,500 and general and administrative expenses were $223,415. For the twelve months ending October 31, 2012, general and administrative expenses were $46,049.

~~Mascot~~Operating ~~Ventures~~expenses, ~~Inc.~~consisting issolely anof ~~exploration~~general ~~stage company~~ and ~~currently~~administrative ~~has~~expenses noin ~~operations.~~the ~~Our~~year ~~independent~~ended ~~auditor~~October ~~has~~31, ~~issued~~2013, anconsisted ~~audit~~primarily ~~opinion~~of ~~for~~management ~~Mascot~~fees, ~~Ventures~~rent, ~~which~~filing ~~includes~~fees, ashare ~~statement~~transfer ~~raising~~fees, ~~substantial~~accounting ~~doubt~~fees, asconsulting tofees ~~our~~and ~~ability~~service toproviders ~~continue~~for asmarketing aand ~~going~~software ~~concern~~development.

From the period of September 25, 2007 (inception) to October 31, 2013, we incurred operating expenses of $423,288. We have incurred recurring losses to date. Our financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern and, accordingly, do not include adjustments relating to the recoverability and realization of assets and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue in operation.

We expect we will require additional capital to meet our long term operating requirements. We expect to raise additional capital through, among other things, the sale of equity or debt securities.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

~~Our~~Twelve ~~cash~~Months ~~balance~~Ended at October 31, 2012 was $5 with $56,966 in outstanding liabilities. Total expenditures over the next 12 months are expected to be approximately $35,000. If we experience a shortage of funds prior to generating revenues from operations we may utilize funds from our directors, who have informally agreed to advance funds to allow us to pay for operating costs, however they have no formal commitment, arrangement or legal obligation to advance or loan funds to us. Management believes our current cash balance will not be sufficient to fund our operations for the next twelve months.2013

13As of October 31, 2013, we had assets totaling $565 and our total liabilities were $290,560, comprised of $10,819 of a convertible note payable, net of discount, with derivative liability of $44,751, accounts payable and accrued expenses equal to $165,129, and $69,861 in advances from related parties.

~~PLAN~~As OFof ~~OPERATION~~October 31, 2012, we had $6,505 in assets and $56,966 in liabilities. Stockholders’ deficit increased from $50,461 as of October 31, 2012 to $289,995 as of October 31, 2013.

~~Our~~Cash ~~plan~~Flows of operation for the next twelve months is to complete the first and second phases of the three phased exploration program on our claim. In addition to the $19,000 we anticipate spending for the first two phases of the exploration program as outlined below, we anticipate spending an additional $16,000 on general and administration expenses including fees payable in connection with complying with reporting obligations, and general administrative costs. Total expenditures over the next 12 months are therefore expected to be approximately $35,000. If we experience a shortage of funds prior to funding we may utilize funds from ~~our~~Financing ~~directors, however they have no formal commitment, arrangement or legal obligation to advance or loan funds to the company.~~Activities

~~Phase~~We 1:have ~~Localized~~financed ~~soil~~our ~~surveys,~~operations ~~trenching~~primarily from either advancements or the issuance of equity and ~~sampling~~debt ~~over~~instruments. ~~known~~For the period from inception (September 25, 2007) to October 31, 2013, cash provided by financing activities was $160,361, which consists of proceeds received from the issuance of a promissory note in the amount of $40,000, $50,500 from the issuance of common stock for cash, and ~~indicated~~$69,861, ~~mineralized~~net, ~~zones~~from advances by related parties.

~~Phase~~Current 2:cash ~~VLF-EM~~on ~~and~~hand ~~magnetometer~~is ~~surveys~~insufficient for all of the Company’s commitments for the next 12 months. We anticipate that the additional funding that we require will be in the form of equity financing.

~~Phase~~We 3:estimate ~~Positive~~that ~~areas~~within ~~will~~the ~~need~~next to12 bemonths ~~diamond~~we ~~drill~~will ~~tested.~~need ~~The~~approximately ~~amount~~$200,000 offor ~~drilling~~acquisition ~~will~~of ~~depend~~inventory, onmarketing ~~the~~and ~~success~~developing ofa ~~phase~~distribution ~~1 and 2~~chain.

BUDGET
	$
Phase 1		7,000
Phase 2		12,000
Phase 3		75,000
Total		94,000

We cannot be certain that the required additional financing will be available or available on terms favorable to us. We currently do not have any arrangements or commitments in place for any other financings. If additional funds are raised by the issuance of our equity securities, existing stockholders will experience dilution of their ownership interest. If adequate funds are not available or not available on acceptable terms, we may be unable to fund our operations.

We ~~plan~~have no lines of credit or other bank financing arrangements. Generally, we have financed operations to ~~commence~~date ~~Phase~~through 1the proceeds of the ~~exploration~~private ~~program~~placement onof ~~the~~equity ~~claim~~and debt instruments. In connection with our business plan, management anticipates additional increases in ~~spring~~operating ~~2013~~expenses and capital expenditures relating to: (i) acquisition of inventory; (ii) developmental expenses associated with a start-up business; and (iii) marketing expenses. We ~~expect~~intend ~~this~~to ~~phase~~finance tothese ~~take~~expenses ~~two~~with ~~weeks~~equity sales or loans. Additional issuances of equity or convertible debt securities will result in dilution to ~~complete~~our ~~and~~current anshareholders. ~~additional~~Further, ~~one~~such securities might have rights, preferences or privileges senior to ~~two~~our ~~months~~common ~~for~~stock. ~~the~~Additional ~~geologist~~financing may not be available upon acceptable terms, or at all. If adequate funds are not available or are not available on acceptable terms, we may not be able to ~~prepare~~take ~~his~~advantage ~~report~~of prospective new business endeavors or opportunities, which could significantly and materially restrict our business operations.

The above program costs are management’s estimates based upon the recommendations of the professional geologist’s report and the actual project costs may exceed our estimates. To date, we have not commenced exploration.

Following phase one of the exploration program, if it proves successful in identifying mineral deposits, we intend to proceed with phase two of our exploration program. Subject to the results of phase 1, we anticipate commencing with phase 2 in summer 2013. We will require additional funding to proceed with phase 3 work on the claim; we have no current plans on how to raise the additional funding. We cannot provide any assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funds to proceed with any work after the first two phases of the exploration program.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

WeAs of the date of this Annual Report, we do not have noany off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

~~ITEM~~GOING ~~7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK~~CONCERN

AsThe independent auditors' report accompanying our October 31, 2013 and October 31, 2012 financial statements contains an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a ~~“smaller~~going ~~reporting~~concern. ~~company~~The Company has incurred losses since inception resulting in an accumulated deficit of $439,”495 as ~~defined~~of October 31, 2013 and further losses are anticipated in ~~Rule~~the ~~12b-2~~development of the ~~Exchange~~business ~~Act~~raising substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements have been prepared "assuming that we will continue as a going concern," which contemplates that we ~~are~~will ~~not~~realize ~~required~~our toassets ~~provide~~and ~~the~~satisfy ~~information~~our ~~called~~liabilities ~~for~~and bycommitments ~~this~~in ~~Item~~the ordinary course of business.

14Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

LBB & ASSOCIATES LTD., LLP

10260 Westheimer Road, Suite 310

Houston, TX 77042

Phone: (713) 800-4343 Fax: (713) 456-2408

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of

~~Mascot Ventures~~eMoneco, Inc.

(Anformerly ~~Exploration~~Mascot ~~Stage~~Ventures, ~~Company~~Inc.)

~~Carson~~(A ~~City,~~Development ~~Nevada~~Stage Company)

~~We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Mascot Ventures~~Leawood, Inc. (the “Company”) as of October 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended October 31, 2012 and for the period from September 25, 2007 (inception) through October 31, 2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.Kansas

We ~~conducted~~have ~~our~~audited ~~audits~~the inaccompanying ~~accordance~~balance ~~with~~sheets ~~the standards~~ of ~~the~~eMoneco, ~~Public~~Inc. ~~Company~~(formerly ~~Accounting~~Mascot ~~Oversight~~Ventures, ~~Board~~Inc.) (~~United~~the ~~States~~“Company”)~~. Those~~ ~~standards~~as ~~require~~of ~~that~~October we31, ~~plan~~2013 and ~~perform~~2012, ~~the~~and ~~audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether~~ the ~~financial~~related statements ~~are free~~ of ~~material~~operations, ~~misstatement. The~~stockholders' ~~Company is not required to have~~deficit, ~~nor~~and ~~were~~cash weflows ~~engaged~~for toeach ~~perform, an audit~~ of ~~its~~the ~~internal~~years ~~control~~in ~~over~~the ~~financial~~two-year ~~reporting. Our~~period ~~audits~~ended ~~included~~October ~~consideration~~31, of2013 ~~internal~~and ~~control over financial reporting as a basis~~ for ~~designing~~the ~~audit~~period ~~procedures~~from ~~that~~September ~~are appropriate in the circumstances~~25, ~~but~~2007 ~~not~~(inception) ~~for~~through ~~the~~October ~~purpose~~31, of2013. ~~expressing~~These anfinancial ~~opinion~~statements onare the ~~effectiveness~~responsibility of the Company’'s ~~internal~~management. ~~control~~Our ~~over~~responsibility ~~financial~~is ~~reporting. Accordingly,~~to we express noan ~~such~~ opinion~~. An~~ ~~audit also includes examining,~~ on athese ~~test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the~~ financial statements, ~~assessing~~based ~~the~~on ~~accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that~~ our audits ~~provide a reasonable basis for our opinion~~.

InWe conducted our ~~opinion,~~audits in accordance with the ~~financial~~standards ~~statements~~of ~~referred~~the toPublic ~~above~~Company ~~present~~Accounting ~~fairly,~~Oversight inBoard ~~all~~(United ~~material~~States). Those ~~respects,~~standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial ~~position~~statements ofare ~~Mascot~~free ~~Ventures,~~of ~~Inc~~material misstatement. The asCompany ofis ~~October~~not 31required to have, ~~2012~~nor ~~and~~were ~~2011,~~we ~~and~~engaged ~~the~~to ~~results~~perform, an audit of its ~~operations~~internal ~~and~~control ~~its~~over ~~cash~~financial ~~flows~~reporting. Our ~~for~~audit ~~each~~included consideration of ~~the~~internal ~~years~~control inover ~~the~~financial ~~two-year~~reporting ~~period~~as ~~ended~~a ~~October~~basis 31for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, ~~2012~~but ~~and~~not for the ~~period~~purpose ~~from~~of ~~September~~expressing 25an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, ~~2007~~we ~~(inception)~~express ~~through~~no ~~October~~such 31opinion. An audit also includes examining, ~~2012~~on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in ~~conformity~~the ~~with~~financial statements, assessing the accounting principles ~~generally~~used ~~accepted~~and insignificant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the ~~United~~overall ~~States~~financial ofstatement ~~America~~presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

AsIn ~~discussed~~our inopinion, ~~Note~~the 1financial statements referred to ~~the~~above ~~financial~~present ~~statements~~fairly, in all material respects, the ~~Company's~~financial ~~absence~~position of ~~significant~~eMoneco, ~~revenues~~Inc. (formerly Mascot Ventures, ~~recurring~~Inc.) ~~losses~~as ~~from~~of ~~operations~~October 31, 2013 and ~~its~~2012, ~~need~~and ~~for~~the ~~additional~~results ~~financing~~of inits ~~order~~operations toand ~~fund~~ its ~~projected~~cash ~~loss~~flows for each of the years in ~~2013~~the ~~raise~~two-year ~~substantial~~period ~~doubt~~ended ~~about~~October ~~its~~31, ~~ability~~2013 toand ~~continue~~for asthe aperiod ~~going~~from ~~concern.~~September ~~The~~25, ~~2012~~2007 ~~financial~~(inception) ~~statements~~through doOctober ~~not~~31, ~~include~~2013 ~~any~~in ~~adjustments~~conformity ~~that~~with ~~might~~accounting ~~result~~principles ~~from~~generally accepted in the ~~outcome~~United States of ~~this uncertainty~~America.

As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the Company's absence of significant revenues, recurring losses from operations, and its need for additional financing in order to fund its projected loss in 2014 raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The 2013 financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ LBB & Associates Ltd., LLP

LBB & Associates Ltd., LLP

Houston, Texas

~~January~~February 2110, ~~2013~~ 2014

1510

~~ITEM~~eMONEco, 8Inc. ~~FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~

~~MASCOT~~(formerly ~~VENTURES~~Mascot ~~INC~~Ventures, Inc.)

	October 31, 2012			October 31, 2011
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	5		$	22,938
Total current assets		5			22,938
Other Assets
Mining Claim		6,500			6,500
TOTAL ASSETS	$	6,505		$	29,438
LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	4,478		$	-
Loan from shareholder		52,488			51,850
TOTAL LIABILITIES		56,966			51,850
Commitments
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Common stock $0.001 par value, 75,000,000 shares authorized 11,860,000 shares issued and outstanding at October 31, 2012 and October 31, 2011 respectively		11,860			11,860
Additional paid-in capital		130,140			112,140
Deficit accumulated during exploration stage		(192,461	)		(146,412	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT		(50,461	)		(22,412	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT	$	6,505		$	29,438

(A Development Stage Company)

~~The~~Balance ~~accompanying footnotes are an integral part of these financial statements.~~Sheets


	October 31, 2013			October 31, 2012
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	565		$	5
Total current assets		565			5

Other Assets
Mining Claim		-			6,500
TOTAL ASSETS	$	565		$	6,505

LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expense	$	165,129		$	4,478
Advances from related parties		69,861			52,488
Total current liabilities		234,990			56,966

Convertible note payable, net discount of $29,181 and $0 at October 31, 2013 and October 31, 2012 respectively		10,819			-
Derivative liability		44,751			-
Total liabilities		290,560			56,966
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Preferred stock $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, 100 Series A designated, none issued as of October 31, 2013 and 2012 respectively		-			-
Common stock $0.001 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized 154,180,000 shares issued and outstanding at October 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively		154,180			154,180
Additional paid-in capital		(4,680	)		(12,180	)
Deficit accumulated during development stage		(439,495	)		(192,461	)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT		(289,995	)		(50,461	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT	$	565		$	6,505

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

							Inception (September 25, 2007)
	Year Ending			Year Ending			Through
	October 31, 2012			October 31, 2011			October 31, 2012
Operating Costs
General and Administrative	$	46,049		$	42,469		$	193,373
Total Operating Costs		(46,049	)		(42,469	)		(193,373	)
Interest Income		-			-			912
Net Loss	$	(46,049	)	$	(42,469	)	$	(192,461	)
Net Loss per share basic and diluted	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)
Weighted average number of
common shares outstanding
basic and diluted		11,860,000			11,860,000

~~The~~eMONEco, ~~accompanying footnotes are an integral part of these financial statements~~Inc.

17(formerly Mascot Ventures, Inc.)

~~MASCOT~~(A ~~VENTURES~~Development ~~INC~~Stage Company)

~~(An~~Statements ~~Exploration~~of ~~Stage Company)~~Operations

	Common Shares			Stock Amount			Additional Paid-in Capital			Deficit Accumulated During Exploration Stage			Total
	Year Ended October 31, 2013			Year Ended October 31, 2012			Inception (September 25, 2007) Through October 31, 2013
Stock issued to founders for cash		10,000,000		$	10,000		$	-		$	-		$	10,000
Operating Costs
Donated services		-			-			1,500			-			1,500
General and Administrative	$	223,415		$	46,049		$	416,788
Net loss		-			-			-			(1,507	)		(1,507	)
Impairment loss		6,500			-			6,500
Balance October 31, 2007		10,000,000			10,000			1,500			(1,507	)		9,993
Total Operating Costs		(229,915	)		(46,049	)		(423,288	)
Stock issued for cash		1,540,000			1,540			15,460			-			17,000
Amortization expense		(10,819	)		-			(10,819	)
Donated services		-			-			18,000			-			18,000
Interest expense		(1,549	)		-			(1,549	)
Net loss		-			-			-			(18,025	)		(18,025	)
Derivative expense		(4,751	)		-			(4,751	)
Balance October 31, 2008		11,540,000			11,540			34,960			(19,532	)		26,968
Interest income		-			-			912
Stock issued for cash		320,000			320			23,180			-			23,500
Net Loss	$	(247,034	)	$	(46,049	)	$	(439,495	)
Donated services		-			-			18,000			-			18,000
Net Loss per share basic and diluted	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)
Net loss		-			-			-			(19,118	)		(19,118	)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding basic and diluted		154,180,000			154,180,000
Balance October 31, 2009		11,860,000			11,860			76,140			(38,650	)		49,350
Donated services		-			-			18,000			-			18,000
Net loss		-			-			-			(65,293	)		(65,293	)
Balance October 31, 2010		11,860,000			11,860			94,140			(103,943	)		2,057
Donated services		-			-			18,000			-			18,000
Net loss		-			-			-			(42,469	)		(42,469	)
Balance October 31, 2011		11,860,000			11,860			112,140			(146,412	)		(22,412	)
Donated services		-			-			18,000			-			18,000
Net loss		-			-			-			(46,049	)		(46,049	)
Balance October 31, 2012		11,860,000		$	11,860		$	130,140		$	(192,461	)	$	(50,461	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

~~The accompanying footnotes are an integral part of these financial statements.~~12

18eMONEco, Inc.

(Anformerly ~~Exploration~~Mascot ~~Stage~~Ventures, ~~Company~~Inc.)

							Inception (September 25, 2007)
	Year Ended			Year Ended			Through
	October 31, 2012			October 31, 2011			October 31, 2012
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(46,049	)	$	(42,469	)	$	(192,461	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Donated services		18,000			18,000			91,500
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts Payable		4,478			(15,424	)		4,478
Pre-paid expenses		-			4,985			-
Net cash used in operating activities		(23,571	)		(34,908	)		(96,483	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Acquisition of mining claim		-			-			(6,500	)
Net cash used in investing activities		-			-			(6,500	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Loan from shareholder		638			51,850			52,488
Issuance of common stock for cash		-			-			50,500
Net cash provided by financing activities		638			51,850			102,988
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(22,933	)		16,942			5
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		22,938			5,996			-
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	5		$	22,938		$	5
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid for :
Interest	$	-		$	-		$	-
Income Taxes	$	-		$	-		$	-

(A Development Stage Company)

~~The~~Statement ~~accompanying footnotes are an integral part~~ of ~~these~~Stockholders’ ~~financial~~Equity ~~statements.~~(Deficit)

19Period from September 25, 2007 (inception) through October 31, 2013

MASCOT VENTURES INC.


	Common Shares		Stock Amount		Additional Paid-in Capital			Deficit Accumulated During Exploration Stage			Total
Stock issued to founders for cash		130,000,000	$	130,000	$	(120,000	)	$	-		$	10,000
Donated services		-		-		1,500			-			1,500
Net loss		-		-		-			(1,507	)		(1,507	)
Balance October 31, 2007		130,000,000		130,000		(118,500	)		(1,507	)		9,993
Stock issued for cash		20,020,000		20,020		(3,020	)		-			17,000
Donated services		-		-		18,000			-			18,000
Net loss		-		-		-			(18,025	)		(18,025	)
Balance October 31, 2008		150,020,000		150,020		(103,520	)		(19,532	)		26,968
Stock issued for cash		4,160,000		4,160		19,340			-			23,500
Donated services		-		-		18,000			-			18,000
Net loss		-		-		-			(19,118	)		(19,118	)
Balance October 31, 2009		154,180,000		154,180		(66,180	)		(38,650	)		49,350
Donated services		-		-		18,000			-			18,000
Net loss		-		-		-			(65,293	)		(65,293	)
Balance October 31, 2010		154,180,000		154,180		(48,180	)		(103,943	)		2,057
Donated services		-		-		18,000			-			18,000
Net loss		-		-		-			(42,469	)		(42,469	)
Balance October 31, 2011		154,180,000		154,180		(30,180	)		(146,412	)		(22,412	)
Donated services		-		-		18,000			-			18,000
Net loss		-		-		-			(46,049	)		(46,049	)
Balance October 31, 2012		154,180,000		154,180		(12,180	)		(192,461	)		(50,461	)
Donated services		-		-		7,500			-			7,500
Net loss		-		-		-			(247,034	)		(247,034	)
Balance October 31, 2013		154,180,000	$	154,180	$	(4,680	)	$	(439,495	)	$	(289,995	)

~~NOTES~~The TOaccompanying ~~FINANCIAL~~notes ~~STATEMENTS~~are an integral part of these financial statements.

~~(An Exploration Stage Company)~~13

~~Mascot~~eMONEco, ~~Ventures~~ Inc. (“The Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on September 25, 2007 to engage in the acquisition, exploration and development of natural resource properties. The Company is in the exploration stage with no revenues and limited operating history.

~~These~~(formerly ~~financial~~Mascot statements have been prepared on a going concern basis which assumes the Company will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. The Company anticipates future losses in the development of its business raising substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company generating profitable operations in the future and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Management intends to finance operating costs over the next twelve months with existing cash on handVentures, ~~loans from directors and/or issuance of common shares~~Inc.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Cash Flows


	Year Ended October 31, 2013			Year Ended October 31, 2012			Inception (September 25, 2007) Through October 31, 2013
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(247,034	)	$	(46,049	)	$	(439,495	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Donated services		7,500			18,000			99,000
Impairment loss		6,500			-			6,500
Amortization of debt discount		10,819			-			10,819
Derivative expense		4,751			-			4,751
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts Payable and accrued expenses		160,651			4,478			165,129
Net cash used in operating activities		(56,813	)		(23,571	)		(153,296	)
Acquisition of mining claim		-			-			(6,500	)
Net cash used in investing activities		-			-			(6,500	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from related party advances		27,373			638			79,861
Repayments of related party advances		(10,000	)		-			(10,000	)
Proceeds from issuance of convertible note		40,000			-			40,000
Issuance of common stock for cash		-			-			50,500
Net cash provided by financing activities		57,373			638			160,361
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		560			(22,933	)		565
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		5			22,938			-
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	565		$	5		$	565

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid for :
Interest	$	-		$	-		$	-
Income Taxes	$	-		$	-		$	-
Non Cash Investing and Financing Activities:
Debt discount on convertible note	$	40,000		$	-		$	40,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

eMONEco, Inc.

(formerly Mascot Ventures, Inc.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes To The Financial Statements

October 31, 2013

1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS

eMONEco, Inc. (formerly Mascot Ventures Inc.) (“the Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on September 25, 2007 to engage in the acquisition, exploration and development of natural resource properties. The Company is in the exploration stage with no revenues and limited operating history.

On April 15, 2013, the Company entered into a Reorganization and Exclusive Sponsorship Licensing Agreement with JBD Consulting LLC and Mobile Mone, Inc. to provide mobile payments, remittance, banking, and commerce services and has totally abandoned previous plans to exploit and develop natural resource properties.

These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis which assumes the Company will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business for the foreseeable future. The Company anticipates future losses in the development of its business raising substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company generating profitable operations in the future and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. Management intends to finance operating costs over the next twelve months with loans from directors and/or issuance of common shares.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America and are presented in US dollars. The Company’s year -end is October 31.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Foreign Currency Translation

The financial statements are presented in United States dollars. In accordance with ASC 830, “Foreign Currency Matters”, foreign denominated monetary assets and liabilities are translated into their United States dollar equivalents using foreign exchange rates which prevailed at the balance sheet date. Revenue and expenses are translated at average rates of exchange during the year. Gains or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in results of operations.

~~Exploration~~Development Stage Company

The Company complies with Financial ~~Accounting~~ Standards Codification (“ASC”) 915 and Securities ~~and~~ Exchange Commission Act Guide 7 for its characterization of the Company as ana ~~exploration~~development stage enterprise.

2015

~~MASCOT~~eMONEco, ~~VENTURES INC~~Inc.

~~NOTES~~(formerly TOMascot ~~FINANCIAL~~Ventures, ~~STATEMENTS~~Inc.)

(AnA ~~Exploration~~Development Stage Company)

~~Mineral~~Notes ~~Interests~~To The Financial Statements

The Company’s management has considered the conditions outlined in ASC 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment,” and has concluded no impairment of the $6,500 mining claim acquisition costs on the Property has taken place for the year ended October 31, 2012. Mineral property acquisition costs are capitalized in accordance with EITF 04-2. Mineral property exploration costs are expensed as incurred. When it has been determined that a mineral property can be economically developed as a result of establishing proven and probable reserves, the costs incurred to develop such property are capitalized. To date the Company has not established any reserves on its mineral properties2013

Impairment of Long-lived Assets

The Company reviews long-lived assets for indicators of impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. If the review indicates that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable, the potential impairment is measured based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate that is considered to be commensurate with the risk inherent in the Company's current business model. For purposes of recognition and measurement of an impairment loss, a long-lived asset is grouped with other assets at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets.

Fair Value of Financial Instrument

The Company’s financial instruments consisted of cash, ~~shareholder~~accounts ~~loans~~payable, related party advances and ~~accounts~~convertible ~~payable~~notes. Unless otherwise noted, it is management’s opinion the Company is not exposed to significant interest, currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments. Because of the short maturity of such assets and liabilities the fair value of these financial instruments approximate their carrying values, unless otherwise noted.

Derivative Instruments

In connection with the sale of debt or equity instruments, the debt or equity instruments may contain embedded derivative instruments, such as embedded derivative features which in certain circumstances may be required to be bifurcated from the associated host instrument and accounted for separately as a derivative instrument liability.

The Company's derivative instrument liabilities are re-valued at the end of each reporting period, with changes in the fair value of the derivative liability recorded as charges or credits to income in the period in which the changes occur. For bifurcated embedded derivative features that are accounted for as derivative instrument liabilities, the Company estimates fair value using either quoted market prices of financial instruments with similar characteristics or other valuation techniques. The valuation techniques require assumptions related to the remaining term of the instruments and risk-free rates of return, our current common stock price and expected dividend yield, and the expected volatility of our common stock price over the life of the option. Because of the limited trading history for our common stock, the Company estimates the future volatility of its common stock price based on not only the history of its stock price but also the experience of other entities considered comparable to the Company.

The Company estimates fair value of derivative instrument liabilities using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing formula (“Black-Scholes model”). This model requires the Company to estimate expected volatility and expected life, which are highly complex and subjective variables. The Company estimates expected term using the safe-harbor provisions of FASB ASC 718. The Company estimated its expected volatility by taking the volatility determined for a peer group of a similar publicly-traded company.

Income Taxes

The Company follows the accrual method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the estimated tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying values and their respective income tax basis (temporary differences). The effect on the deferred income tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. At October 31, ~~2012~~2013, a full deferred tax asset valuation allowance has been provided and no deferred tax asset has been recorded.

Basic and Diluted Net ~~Income~~ (Loss) per Share

The Company computes net ~~income~~ (loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260, "Earnings per Share" which requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (EPS) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net ~~income~~ (loss) available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period including stock options, using the treasury stock method, and convertible preferred stock, using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential common shares if their effect is anti-dilutive.

2116

~~MASCOT~~eMONEco, ~~VENTURES INC~~Inc.

~~NOTES~~(formerly TOMascot ~~FINANCIAL~~Ventures, ~~STATEMENTS~~Inc.)

(AnA ~~Exploration~~Development Stage Company)

~~Period~~Notes ~~from~~To ~~September~~The ~~25,~~Financial ~~2007 (Inception) through October 31, 2012~~Statements

October 31, 2013

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The Company does not expect the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements to have any significant impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flow.

As new accounting pronouncements are issued, the Company will adopt those that are applicable under the circumstances.

The President of the Company provides management fees and office premises to the Company for a fee of $1,500 per month, the right to which the President has agreed to assign to the Company until such time as the Company closes on an equity or debt financing of not less than $100,0003. RELATED ~~The~~PARTY assigned rights are valued at $1,000 per month for executive compensation and $500 for rent. A total of $91,500 for donated management fees were charged to operating and general expenses and recorded as donated capital (Additional Paid in Capital) for the period from September 25, 2007 (inception) to October 31, 2012. This agreement expires November 19, 2013.TRANSACTIONS

AsThe President of ~~10/31/2012~~the ~~there~~Company ~~were~~provided ~~loans~~management ~~from~~fees and office premises to the ~~shareholder~~Company ~~totaling~~for a fee of $521,~~488~~500 per month, the right to which the President has agreed to assign to the Company until such time as the Company closes on an equity or debt financing of not less than $100,000. ~~These~~The ~~advances~~assigned rights are ~~due~~valued onat ~~demand~~$1,000 per month for executive compensation and ~~carry~~$500 nofor ~~interest~~rent. orA ~~collateral~~total of $99,000 for donated management fees were charged to operating and general expenses and recorded as donated capital (Additional Paid in Capital) for the period from September 25, 2007 (inception) to October 31, 2013. From November 1, 2012 through March 31, 2013 these fees are $7,500. The President of the Company resigned effective March 31, 2013 and this practice was discontinued at that time.

a)During Inthe year ended October ~~2007~~31, 2013, the Company ~~issued~~incurred 5$109,~~000,000~~801 ~~common~~in ~~shares~~consulting offees ~~the Company~~ to ~~each~~JBD ofConsulting, ~~two~~LLC, ~~Directors~~which atis ~~$0.001~~owned ~~per~~by ~~share~~the ~~for~~CEO ~~cash proceeds~~ of ~~$5,000~~the ~~from each director~~Company.

b)As Inof ~~November~~October ~~2007~~31, 2013 there were advances from the ~~Company~~majority ~~issued~~shareholder 1and a related party totaling $69,~~500,000~~861. ~~common~~These ~~shares~~were ofmade ~~the~~in ~~Company~~order atto $0assist in meeting general and administrative expenses.01 ~~per~~They ~~share~~carry ~~for~~no ~~cash~~interest ~~proceeds~~or ofmaturity ~~$15~~date,~~000~~ unsecured and are due upon demand.

~~c) In June 2008 the Company issued 40,000 common shares of the Company at $0~~4.05 STOCKHOLDER’S ~~per share for cash proceeds of $2,000.~~DEFICIT

d)On InAugust ~~November~~31, ~~2008~~2013, the Company ~~authorized~~declared ~~for~~a ~~issue~~forward ~~20,000~~stock ~~common~~split of thirteen (13) shares of ~~the~~common ~~Company~~stock atto ~~$0.05~~one ~~per~~(1) share ~~for~~of ~~cash~~common ~~proceeds~~stock, to all shareholders of $1record as of this date,~~000~~ which became effective December 23, 2013 after notification to the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”). The forward stock split has been shown retroactively.

ea) In ~~July~~October ~~2009~~2007 the Company ~~authorized~~issued ~~for issue 150~~130,000,000 common shares (post forward split) of the Company atto ~~$0.05~~the ~~per~~two ~~share~~Directors for cash proceeds of $710,~~500~~000.

fb) In ~~July~~November ~~2009,~~2007 the Company ~~authorized~~issued ~~for 150~~19,500,000 common shares (post forward split) of the Company ~~at $.10 per share~~ for cash proceeds of $15,000.

Atc) ~~October~~In ~~31,~~June ~~2012~~2008 ~~there~~the ~~are~~Company ~~total~~issued ~~of 75~~520,000~~,000~~ common shares ~~authorized~~(post ~~and~~forward ~~11,860,000~~split) ~~shares~~ of the Company’s ~~common~~for ~~shares~~cash ~~issued~~proceeds ~~and~~of ~~outstanding~~$2,000.

22d) In November 2008, the Company issued 260,000 common shares (post forward split) of the Company for cash proceeds of $1,000.

~~MASCOT~~e) ~~VENTURES~~In ~~INC~~July 2009 the Company issued 1,950,000 common shares (post forward split) of the Company for cash proceeds of $7,500.

~~NOTES~~f) TOIn ~~FINANCIAL~~July ~~STATEMENTS~~2009 the Company issued 1,950,000 common shares (post forward split) of the Company for cash proceeds of $15,000.

At October 31, 2013, there are a total of 500,000,000 shares authorized and 154,180,000 (Anpost ~~Exploration~~forward ~~Stage~~split) of the Company)’s common shares issued and outstanding.

5. INCOME TAXES

The Company follows ASC 740. Deferred income taxes reflect the net effect of (a) temporary difference between carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial purposes and the amounts used for income tax reporting purposes, and (b) net operating loss carry-forwards. No net provision for refundable Federal income tax has been made in the accompanying statement of loss because no recoverable taxes were paid previously. Similarly, no deferred tax asset attributable to the net operating loss carry-forward has been recognized, as it is not deemed likely to be realized.

eMONEco, Inc.

(formerly Mascot Ventures, Inc.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes To The Financial Statements

October 31, 2013

The provision for refundable federal income tax consists of the following for the periods ending:

	October 31, 2012			October 31, 2011
	October 31, 2013			October 31, 2012
Federal income tax benefit attributed to:
Net operating loss	$	1583,~~650~~990		$	1415,~~440~~650
Valuation allowance		(1583,~~650~~990	)		(1415,~~440~~650	)
Net benefit	$	-		$	-
The cumulative tax effect at the expected rate of 34% of significant	October 31, 2013			October 31, 2012
items comprising our net deferred tax amount is as follows:
Deferred tax attributed:
Net operating loss carryover	$	149,420		$	65,430
Less: change in valuation allowance		(149,420	)		(65,430	)
Net deferred tax asset	$	-		$	-

~~The~~At ~~cumulative~~October ~~tax~~31, ~~effect~~2013, at the ~~expected~~Company ~~rate~~had ofan ~~34%~~unused ofnet ~~significant items~~operating ~~comprising~~loss ~~our~~carry-forward ~~net~~approximating ~~deferred~~$433,000 ~~tax~~that ~~amount~~ is asavailable ~~follows:~~to offset future taxable income; the loss carry-forward will start to expire in 2029.

	October 31, 2012			October 31, 2011
Deferred tax attributed:
Net operating loss carryover		65,430			49,780
Less: change in valuation allowance		(65,430	)		(49,780	)
Net deferred tax asset		-			-

6. CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE

AtOn ~~October~~July 3122, ~~2012~~2013, the Company ~~had~~issued ana ~~unused~~Convertible ~~net~~Note ~~operating~~(the ~~loss~~“Note”) ~~carry-forward~~to ~~approximating~~Aldebourne Ltd. (the Note holder). In connection with a $~~192~~40,000 ~~that~~working iscapital ~~available~~loan to ~~offset~~the ~~future~~Company. ~~taxable~~The ~~income;~~terms and conditions of such Note allow for the ~~loss~~prepayment ~~carry-forward~~of ~~will~~principle ~~start~~and accrued interest upon three (3) days’ written notice to ~~expire~~the inholder. ~~2027~~The Company may pay 150% of the entire outstanding principal amount of the Note plus any accrued or unpaid interest. The Note holder retains the right to convert at any time, outstanding balance and accrued interest into shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price equal to 70% of the average lowest trading price for the five days prior to the conversion date. The Company recorded a discount of $40,000 related to the derivative liability at inception and a derivative expense of $14,795 at inception. The Company recorded a derivative liability of $44,751 and derivative expense of $4,751 for the year ended October 31, 2013. The interest rate is 14% per annum and the maturity date is July 21, 2015. The total accrued interest as of October 31, 2013 is $1,549.

237. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

~~ITEM~~On 9November 12, 2013, the Company issued a Convertible Note (the “Note”) to Aldebourne Ltd. ~~CHANGES~~in INconnection ~~AND~~with ~~DISAGREEMENTS~~a ~~WITH~~$50,000 ~~ACCOUNTANTS~~working ONcapital ~~FINANCIAL~~loan ~~DISCLOSURE~~to the Company. The loan matures on November 12, 2014 and carries an interest rate of 14% per annum, which will accrue and become due and payable with the principle. If either party decides to convert the Note and all accrued interest at the maturity date or before into common stock at a par value of $0.001, then the conversion rate will be $0.25 per share.

eMONEco, Inc.

(formerly Mascot Ventures, Inc.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes To The Financial Statements

October 31, 2013

On November 14, 2013, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation with the State of Nevada, changing the name of the Corporation to “eMONEco, Inc.” from Mascot Ventures, Inc. This will be effective November 25, 2013.

On November 20, 2013, the Company issued a total of 108,333,329 shares of restricted common stock (post- forward stock split) to JBD Consulting, LLC pursuant to the terms of the MONE Licensing Agreement.

On December 10, 2013, the Company issued a Convertible Promissory Note (the “Note”) to Pro Players LLC in connection with a $10,000 working capital loan to the Company. The Note matures on December 10, 2014 and carries an interest rate of 14% per annum, which will accrue and become due and payable with the principle. If either party decides to convert the Note and all accrued interest at the maturity date or before into common stock at a par value of $0.001, then the conversion rate will be $0.25 per share.

On December 13, 2013, the Company issued a Convertible Promissory Note to Pro Players LLC in connection with a $10,000 working capital loan to the Company. The Note matures on December 13, 2014 and carries an interest rate of 14% per annum, which will accrue and become due and payable with the principle. If either party decides to convert the Note and all accrued interest at the maturity date or before into common stock at a par value of $0.001, then the conversion rate will be $0.25 per share.

On December 16, 2013, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation with the State of Nevada, increasing the authorized Common Shares with a par value of $0.001 per share, from 75,000,000 to 500,000,000. The Amendment included the designation of 10,000,000 Preferred Shares with a par value of $0.001 per share.

On December 17, 2013, the Company filed a Certificate of Designation with the State of Nevada regarding the designation of 100 Series A Preferred Shares with a par value of $0.001 per share.

In their entirety the Series A Preferred Shares, par value $0.001 per share, shall have the voting rights, at all times equal to 51% of the then voting rights of the Company. Each Preferred Share shall individually maintain voting rights equal to its pro rata allocation of the entirety of the Series, or 51%. Each share shall be convertible at an equal rate to voting rights. Any conversion of one or more Preferred Shares shall thereafter reduce the voting rights of the Series by the same.

Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

~~ITEM~~Item 9A. ~~CONTROLS~~Controls ~~AND~~and ~~PROCEDURES~~Procedures

~~DISCLOSURE~~Evaluation ~~CONTROLS~~of ~~AND~~disclosure ~~PROCEDURES~~controls and procedures.

~~Under~~We ~~the~~maintain ~~supervision~~controls and ~~with~~procedures ~~the~~that ~~participation~~are ofdesigned ~~our~~to ~~management,~~ensure ~~including~~that ~~our~~information ~~principal~~required ~~executive~~to ~~officer~~be ~~and~~disclosed in the ~~principal~~reports ~~financial~~that ~~officer,~~ we ~~are~~file ~~responsible~~or ~~for~~submit ~~conducting an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our internal controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)~~ under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, asprocessed, ofsummarized ~~the~~and ~~end~~reported ofwithin the ~~fiscal~~time ~~year~~periods ~~covered~~specified byin ~~this~~the ~~report. Disclosure~~SEC’s ~~controls~~rules and ~~procedures~~forms, ~~means~~and that ~~the~~such ~~material~~ information ~~required to be included in our Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) reports~~ is ~~recorded,~~accumulated ~~processed, summarized~~ and ~~reported~~communicated ~~within~~to ~~the~~our ~~time~~management ~~periods~~including ~~specified~~our inprincipal ~~SEC~~executive ~~rules~~ and principal ~~forms~~financial officer, ~~relating~~as appropriate, to ~~our~~allow ~~company,~~timely ~~including~~decisions ~~any~~regarding ~~consolidating~~required ~~subsidiaries,~~disclosures. ~~and~~Based ~~was~~upon ~~made~~their ~~known~~evaluation toof usthose bycontrols ~~others~~and ~~within~~procedures ~~those~~performed ~~entities,~~as ~~particularly~~of the ~~during~~end of the period ~~when~~covered ~~this~~by ~~report was being prepared. Based on~~ this ~~evaluation~~report, our principal executive ~~officer~~ and principal financial officer concluded ~~as of the evaluation date~~ that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective ~~as of October 31, 2012~~.

~~MANAGEMENT~~Management’Ss ~~ANNUAL~~annual ~~REPORT~~report ONon ~~INTERNAL~~internal ~~CONTROL~~control ~~OVER~~over ~~FINANCIAL~~financial ~~REPORTING~~reporting.

AsDon ofE. ~~October 31~~Latson, ~~2012, management assessed the effectiveness of~~ our ~~internal~~Chief ~~control~~Executive ~~over~~Officer ~~financial~~and ~~reporting.~~Chief ~~The~~Financial ~~Company's~~Officer, ~~management~~ is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting ~~for the Company~~. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) orand 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as ~~amended, as~~ a process designed by, or under the supervision of, ~~the~~our ~~Company’s~~principal ~~Chief~~executive ~~Executive Officer~~ and ~~Chief~~principal ~~Financial~~financial ~~Officer~~officer and effected by ~~the~~our ~~Company’s~~ Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with ~~GAAP~~generally inaccepted ~~the~~accounting ~~United~~principles ~~States of America~~ and includes those policies and procedures that:

· ~~Pertain~~ pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect ~~our~~the transactions and dispositions of our assets; · provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and our directors; and · provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

~~· Provide~~Because ~~reasonable~~of ~~assurance~~its inherent limitations, our ~~transactions~~internal ~~are~~control ~~recorded~~over asfinancial ~~necessary~~reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even those systems determined to ~~permit~~be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. Projections of ~~our~~any ~~financial~~evaluation ~~statements~~of ineffectiveness ~~accordance~~to ~~with~~future ~~GAAP,~~periods ~~and~~are subject to the risk that ~~receipts~~controls ~~and~~may ~~expenditures~~become ~~are~~inadequate ~~being~~because ~~made~~of ~~only~~changes in ~~accordance~~conditions, ~~with~~or ~~authorizations~~that the degree of ~~our~~compliance ~~management~~with ~~and~~the ~~directors;~~policies ~~and~~or procedures may deteriorate.

~~· Provide~~Our ~~reasonable~~Chief ~~assurance~~Executive ~~regarding~~and ~~prevention~~Chief orFinancial ~~timely~~Officer ~~detection~~assessed the effectiveness of ~~unauthorized~~our ~~acquisition,~~internal ~~use~~control orover ~~disposition~~financial reporting as of ~~our~~October ~~assets~~31, ~~that~~2013. In ~~could~~making ~~have~~this aassessment, ~~material~~management ~~effect~~used onthe criteria set forth by the ~~financial~~Committee ~~statement~~of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control — Integrated Framework.

In evaluating the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework. Based on ~~that~~our ~~evaluation~~assessment, ~~completed only by Wendy Wildmen,~~ our ~~President,~~ Chief Executive ~~Officer, Treasurer~~ and ~~Director,~~Chief ~~who~~Financial ~~also~~Officer ~~serves~~believes ~~as our principal financial officer and principal accounting officer~~that, ~~Ms.~~as ~~Wildmen~~of ~~concluded~~October ~~that~~31, ~~during the period covered by this report~~2013, ~~such~~our internal ~~controls~~control ~~and~~over ~~procedures~~financial ~~were~~reporting ~~not~~is effective tobased ~~detect~~on ~~the~~those ~~inappropriate application of US GAAP rules as more fully described below~~criteria.

Accordingly, management believes, based on its knowledge, that (1) this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material face necessary to make the statements made not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report, and (2) the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the years and periods then ended.

This report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only management’s report in this report.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of the year ended October 31, 2013, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

Directors and Executive Officers.

The following table sets forth information regarding our executive officer and directors.


Name and Address	Age	Position(s)

Donald E. Latson	49	Director, President, CFO, CEO, Treasurer

Dale Davis	45	Director, Secretary

Dale Davis as an officer and a Director since April 9, 2013 when he was appointed by Wendy Wildmen, then the sole Elliott Lydell (Dale) Davis, born March 25, 1969 in Toccoa, Georgia is the founder and CEO of both Pro Player Holdings and The Dale Davis Foundation for at Risk Youth, which grants scholarships across the country. Mr. Davis, a graduate of Clemson University with a degree in Business Management, was drafted by the Indiana Pacers in the first round of the 1991 National Basketball Association (NBA) Draft (13th overall).

In his first nine years in the NBA, Mr. Davis led the Pacers in field goal percentage and is ranked first in team history in that category and rebounding. In 2000, Mr. Davis was selected to participate in the NBA All-Star game. He played in the Final Four of the NBA Finals four times and was ranked 22nd in NBA history in career field goal percentage. He also played for Portland, Golden State, New Orleans and Detroit.

Mr. Davis founded the company World Ain’t Right (W.A.R.) Enterprises, which produces projects in the Movie, Music, Technology, Social Media and Entertainment sector. W.A.R. Entertainment has produced several film projects that have been distributed by Universal Studios; as well as several music projects independently distributed.

Mr. Davis is the founder of Pro Player Holdings, LLC. Pro Player Holdings is a privately held, diversified holding company that secures, merges, augments and directs the investments of professional athletes, agents, coaches, managers and investment partners.

As a member of the management team for Pro Player Holdings, LLC Mr. Davis created Pro Player University in conjunction with San Diego University for Integrative Studies. Pro Player University paves the way for professional athletes to continue their educational pursuits via an online educational channel and career development program.

Donald E. Latson has been an officer and a Director since his appointment on April 17, 2013, pursuant to the MONE Licensing Agreement. Mr. Donald E. Latson, born January 27, 1964 in Tampa, Florida is an entrepreneur and Founder and Managing Partner of JBD Consulting, a boutique consulting firm, established in 2005. The firm provides customized payment processing solutions, and develops custom distribution channels for businesses in the financial services and health care market sectors.

From June of 2008 to November of 2009, Mr. Latson served as Vice President of Product Development for US Central Federal Credit Union, at the time the nation’s only wholesale corporate credit union, where he was responsible for emerging markets with emphasis on payments convergence, multi-channel banking, and electronic payments platforms.

In 1996 Mr. Latson was recruited by a Kansas City based venture capital firm to join DynamicVOICE, LLC (formerly CompuSPEAK) in Lenexa, Kansas. The company was instrumental in changing the way wireless digital voice processing devices are implemented and safely used in healthcare environments. Mr. Latson served as President and Chief Operating Officer of the company until 2005, when he founded JBD Consulting.

Mr. Latson’s professional foundation began in 1987 with Dictaphone Corporation in Tampa, Florida where he rapidly rose through the company’s ranks and was promoted to its headquarters in Stratford, CT, in 1990. In the company’s world headquarters Mr. Latson served as Marketing Manager and Marketing Director responsible for the development of strategic alliances, and management of new product launch activities..

Mr. Latson is a 1986 graduate of Valdosta State University with degrees in Marketing (BBA) and Management Information Systems (BBA).

Family Relationships.

There is no family relationship between any of our officers or directors.

Involvement in Legal Proceedings.

There are no orders, judgments, or decrees of any governmental agency or administrator, or of any court of competent jurisdiction, revoking or suspending for cause any license, permit or other authority to engage in the securities business or in the sale of a particular security or temporarily or permanently restraining any of our officers or directors from engaging in or continuing any conduct, practice or employment in connection with the purchase or sale of securities, or convicting such person of any felony or misdemeanor involving a security, or any aspect of the securities business or of theft or of any felony. Nor are any of the officers or directors of any corporation or entity affiliated with us so enjoined.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.

None of our officers, directors, and principal shareholders have filed all reports required to be filed on, respectively, a Form 3 (Initial Statement of Beneficial Ownership of Securities), a Form 4 (Statement of Changes of Beneficial Ownership of Securities), or a Form 5 (Annual Statement of Beneficial Ownership of Securities).

Board Committees.

Our Board of Directors does not currently have a compensation committee or nominating and corporate governance committee because, due to the Board of Director’s composition and our relatively limited operations, the Board of Directors is able to effectively manage the issues normally considered by such committees. Our Board of Directors may undertake a review of the need for these committees in the future.

Audit Committee and Financial Expert.

We do not have an audit committee financial expert because we believe the cost related to retaining a financial expert at this time is prohibitive. Further, because we have no operations, at the present time, we believe the services of a financial expert are not warranted.

Code of Ethics.

We do not have a code of ethics.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

The table below summarizes all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our executive officers by any person for all services rendered in all capacities to us for the last two fiscal years ended on October 31, 2012 and 2013.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE


Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary (US$)		Bonus (US$)		Stock Awards (US$)		Option Awards (US$)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (US$)		Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings (US$)		All Other Compensation (US$)		Total (US$)

Donald Latson	2012		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0
President	2013		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0
Dale Davis	2012		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0
Secretary	2013		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0
Wendy Wildman	2012		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0
Pres. (resigned)	2013		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0
Clive Hope	2012		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0
Sec. (resigned)	2013		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0

There are no current employment agreements between the company and its sole officer. The compensation discussed herein addresses all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our named executive officer. There are no other stock option plans, retirement, pension, or profit sharing plans for the benefit of our officers and directors other than as described herein.

As of October 31, 2013, we had no pension plans or compensatory plans or other arrangements which provide compensation in the event of a termination of employment or a change in our control.

None of our directors have received monetary compensation since our inception until October 31, 2013. We currently do not pay any compensation to our directors serving on our board of directors.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

The following table lists, as of [date], the number of shares of common stock of our Company that are beneficially owned by (i) each person or entity known to our Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding common stock; (ii) each officer and director of our Company; and (iii) all officers and directors as a group. Information relating to beneficial ownership of common stock by our principal shareholders and management is based upon information furnished by each person using “beneficial ownership” concepts under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Under these rules, a person is deemed to be a beneficial owner of a security if that person has or shares voting power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of the security, or investment power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of the security. The person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any security of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Under the Securities and Exchange Commission rules, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same securities, and a person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of securities as to which he or she may not have any pecuniary beneficial interest. Except as noted below, each person has sole voting and investment power.

The percentages below are calculated based on 262,513,329 shares of our common stock issued as of January 28, 2014. Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each stockholder listed below is c/o eMONEco, Inc., 4745 W. 136th Street, Leawood, KS 66224.


Title of Class	Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership		Percentage

Common Stock	JBD Consulting, LLC1		108,333,329		41.27	%
Common Stock	Dale Davis2		0		0.00	%
Common Stock	Wendy Wildman		65,000,000		24.76	%
Common Stock	Clive Hope		65,000,000		24.76	%
Common Stock	All officers and directors (2 persons)		108,333,329		41.27	%

Don E. Latson, the President and CEO of the Company is the principal of JBD Consulting, LLC

Dale Davis is a Director and Officer of the Company

Changes in Control.

Our management is not aware of any arrangements which may result in “changes in control” as that term is defined by the provisions of Item 403(c) of Regulation S-K, currently. How it is anticipated that per the terms of the MONE Licensing Agreement, Don E. Latson or JBD Consulting, LLC shall be issued 100 shares of Series A Preferred stock which voting rights, in total, will equal, at all times, 51% of the then voting. The Series A Preferred shares convert at the same rate and each share shall carry a pro rata conversion feature.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence.

On November 20, 2013, we issued a total of 108,333,329 shares of restricted common stock (post forward stock split) to JBD Consulting, LLC pursuant to the terms of the MONE Licensing Agreement. Don E. Latson, a member of the Board of Directors and our CEO and President, is the principal of JBD Consulting, LLC. Mr. Latson or JBD Consulting, LLC shall receive 100 shares of Series A Preferred shares that vote and convert to common at a rate always equal to 51% of the total voting rights of all other shares. Additionally, the transaction itself is between the Company and JBD Consulting, LLC, who shall be the beneficiary of the licensing arraignments stated therein. A copy of the transaction can be found in the Form 8-K filed with the Commission of April 17, 2013.

Director independence

We are not subject to listing requirements of any national securities exchange or national securities association and, as a result, we are not at this time required to have our board comprised of a majority of “independent directors.”

~~This~~ Item ~~was~~14. ~~due~~Principal toAccountant ~~deficiencies~~Fees ~~that existed in the design or operation of our internal controls over financial reporting that adversely affected our internal controls~~ and ~~that may be considered to be material weaknesses.~~Services

~~The~~Audit matters involving internal controls and procedures that our management considered to be material weaknesses under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board were: (i) lack of a functioning audit committee due to a lack of a majority of independent members and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; (ii) inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives; and (iii) ineffective controls over period end financial disclosure and reporting processesFees. The aforementioned material weaknesses were identified by our President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Director, who also serves as our principal financial officer and principal accounting officer, in connection with the review of our financial statements as of October 31, 2012.

~~Management~~The ~~believes~~aggregate ~~that~~fees ~~the~~billed ~~lack~~in each of athe ~~functioning~~fiscal ~~audit~~years ~~committee~~ended October 31, 2013 and ~~the~~2012 ~~lack~~for ofprofessional aservices ~~majority~~rendered ofby ~~outside~~the ~~directors~~principal onaccountant ~~our~~for ~~board~~the audit of ~~directors~~our ~~results~~annual infinancial ~~ineffective~~statements ~~oversight~~and inquarterly review of the ~~establishment~~financial ~~and~~statements ~~monitoring~~included ofin ~~required~~our ~~internal~~Form ~~controls~~10-K and ~~procedures~~Form 10-Q, ~~which~~respectively, ~~could~~or ~~result~~services inthat aare ~~material~~normally ~~misstatement~~provided by the accountant in ~~our~~connection ~~financial~~with ~~statements~~statutory inand ~~future~~regulatory ~~periods~~filings or engagements for those fiscal years were $11,690 and $11,740 respectively.

~~CHANGES~~Audit-Related ~~IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING~~Fees.

~~There~~For ~~were~~each noof ~~changes in~~ the ~~Company’s~~fiscal ~~internal~~years ~~control~~ended ~~over~~October ~~financial~~31, ~~reporting~~2013 ~~that~~and ~~occurred~~2012, ~~during~~there ~~the~~were ~~fourth~~no ~~quarter~~fees ofbilled ~~the~~for ~~year~~services ~~ended~~reasonably ~~October~~related ~~31,~~to ~~2012~~the ~~that~~performance ~~have~~of ~~materially~~the ~~affected,~~audit or ~~that~~review ~~are~~of ~~reasonably~~the ~~likely~~financial tostatements ~~materially~~outside ~~affect,~~of ~~the~~those ~~Company’s~~fees ~~internal~~disclosed ~~control~~above ~~over~~under ~~financial~~“Audit ~~reporting~~Fees.”

~~ITEM~~Tax 9BFees. ~~OTHER INFORMATION.~~

None.

All Other Fees.

None.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures.

Prior to engaging our accountants to perform a particular service, our Board of Directors obtains an estimate for the service to be performed. All of the services described above were approved by the Board of Directors in accordance with its procedures.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Our executive officer’s and director’s and their respective age’s as of October 31, 2012 are as follows:

Name	Age	Positions and Offices
Ms. Wendy Wildmen	50	President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Director
Mr. Clive Hope	59	Secretary & Director

The directors named above will serve until the next annual meeting of the stockholders or until their respective resignation or removal from office. Thereafter, directors are anticipated to be elected for one-year terms at the annual stockholders’ meeting. Officers will hold their positions at the pleasure of the Board of Directors, absent any employment agreement, of which none currently exists or is contemplated.

Set forth below is a brief description of the background and business experience of our executive officers and directors for the past five years.

WENDY WILDMEN, AGE 50

Ms. Wildmen has served as our President, Chief Executive Officer and a Director since October 3, 2009. Ms. Wildmen has been a contract instructor for various community colleges in the Province of Ontario, Canada, since 1989, teaching primarily in the field of economics. Ms. Wildmen earned her B.A. Degree in Economics from Simon Fraser University, of British Columbia, Canada, followed by her M.A. in Economics, in 1987, at the University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. These experiences, qualifications and attributes have led to our conclusion that Ms. Wildmen should be serving as a member of our Board of Directors in light of our business and structure.

CLIVE HOPE, AGE 59

Mr. Hope has been our Secretary and a Director since incorporation. Mr. Hope has been employed as a pipe fitter for Syncrude Canada since September 1988. These experiences, qualifications and attributes have led to our conclusion that Mr. Hope should be serving as a member of our Board of Directors in light of our business and structure.

TERM OF OFFICE

All directors hold office until the next annual meeting of the stockholders of the Company and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified. The Company’s Bylaws provide that the Board of Directors will consist of no less than three members. Officers are elected by and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Our board of directors is currently composed of two members, neither of whom qualifies as an independent director in accordance with the published listing requirements of the NASDAQ Global Market. The NASDAQ independence definition includes a series of objective tests, such as that the director is not, and has not been for at least three years, one of our employees and that neither the director, nor any of his family members has engaged in various types of business dealings with us. In addition, our board of directors has not made a subjective determination as to each director that no relationships exist which, in the opinion of our board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director, though such subjective determination is required by the NASDAQ rules. Had our board of directors made these determinations, our board of directors would have reviewed and discussed information provided by the directors and us with regard to each director’s business and personal activities and relationships as they may relate to us and our management.

CERTAIN LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

No director, nominee for director, or executive officer of the Company has appeared as a party in any legal proceeding material to an evaluation of his ability or integrity during the past five years.

SIGNIFICANT EMPLOYEES AND CONSULTANTS

Other than our officers and directors, we currently have no other significant employees.

AUDIT COMMITTEE AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Since we do not have an audit or compensation committee comprised of independent directors, the functions that would have been performed by such committees are performed by our directors. The Board of Directors has not established an audit committee and does not have an audit committee financial expert, nor has the Board of Directors established a nominating committee. The Board is of the opinion that such committees are not necessary since the Company is an early exploration stage company and has only two directors, and to date, such directors have been performing the functions of such committees. Thus, there is a potential conflict of interest in that our directors and officers have the authority to determine issues concerning management compensation, nominations, and audit issues that may affect management decisions.

There are no family relationships among our directors or officers. Other than as described above, we are not aware of any other conflicts of interest with any of our executive officers or directors.

SECTION 16(A) BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP REPORTING COMPLIANCE

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who own more than ten percent of a registered class of our equity securities, file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the SEC. Executive officers, directors and greater-than-ten percent stockholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with all Section 16(a) forms they file. Based on our review of filings made on the SEC website, and the fact of us not receiving certain forms or written representations from certain reporting persons that they have complied with the relevant filing requirements, we believe that, during the year ended October 31, 2012, none of our executive officers, directors and greater-than-ten percent stockholders complied with all Section 16(a) filing requirements.

CODE OF ETHICS

The Company has not adopted a code of ethics that applies to its principal executive officers, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. The Company has not adopted a code of ethics because it has only commenced operations.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following tables set forth certain information about compensation paid, earned or accrued for services by our Chief Executive Officer and all other executive officers (collectively, the “Named Executive Officers”) in the fiscal years ended October 31, 2012 and 2011:

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

The table below summarizes all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our Officers for all services rendered in all capacities to us as of the year ended October 31, for the fiscal year ended as indicated.

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation($)		Nonqualified Deferred Compensation($)		All Other Compensation($)		Total ($)
Wendy Wildmen (1)	2012		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0
	2011		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0
Clive Hope (2)	2012		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0
	2011		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0

______________

(1) President and Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Director. Pursuant to a letter agreement, dated November 19, 2009, (i) the Company is obligated to pay Wendy Wildmen, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, and a Director, for a term of two years, $1,000 per month, as consideration for Ms. Wildmen serving and performing her duties as President of the Company, and (ii) Wildmen shall assign her right to such compensation of $1,000 per month to the Company, until such time as the Company closes on an equity or debt financing of not less than $100,000. This compensation arrangement was extended until November 19, 2013, pursuant to a letter agreement dated November 19, 2011 by and between the Company and Ms. Wildmen.

(2) Secretary and Director.

None of our directors have received monetary compensation since our inception until October 31, 2012. We currently do not pay any compensation to our directors serving on our board of directors.

STOCK OPTION GRANTS

We have not granted any stock options to the executive officers since our inception. Upon the further development of our business, we will likely grant options to directors and officers consistent with industry standards for junior mineral exploration companies.

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS

Pursuant to a letter agreement, dated November 19, 2009, (i) the Company is obligated to pay Wendy Wildmen, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and a Director, for a term of two years, $1,000 per month, as consideration for Ms. Wildmen serving and performing her duties as President of the Company, and (ii) Ms. Wildmen shall assign her right to such compensation of $1,000 per month to the Company, until such time as the Company closes on an equity or debt financing of not less than $100,000. This compensation arrangement was extended until November 19, 2013, pursuant to a letter agreement dated November 19, 2011 by and between the Company and Ms. Wildmen.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth director compensation as of October 31, 2012:

Name	Fees Earned Paid in Cash ($)		Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)		All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)
Wendy Wildmen		0		0		0		0		0		0		0
Clive Hope		0		0		0		0		0		0		0

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table lists, as of October 31, 2012, the number of shares of common stock of our Company that are beneficially owned by (i) each person or entity known to our Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding common stock; (ii) each officer and director of our Company; and (iii) all officers and directors as a group. Information relating to beneficial ownership of common stock by our principal shareholders and management is based upon information furnished by each person using “beneficial ownership” concepts under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Under these rules, a person is deemed to be a beneficial owner of a security if that person has or shares voting power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of the security, or investment power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of the security. The person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any security of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Under the Securities and Exchange Commission rules, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same securities, and a person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of securities as to which he or she may not have any pecuniary beneficial interest. Except as noted below, each person has sole voting and investment power.

The percentages below are calculated based on 11,860,000 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding as of October 31, 2012. We do not have any outstanding warrant, options or other securities exercisable for or convertible into shares of our common stock.

Title of Class	Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)	Number of Shares Owned Beneficially		Percent of Class Owned
Common Stock:	Ms. Wendy Wildmen,		5,000,000		42.1	%
	President, President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer and Director
Common Stock:	Mr. Clive Hope,		5,000,000		42.1	%
	Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Director
All executive officers and directors as a group (2 persons)			10,000,000		84.2	%

__________

(1) Unless otherwise noted, the address of each person or entity listed is, c/o Mascot Ventures Inc., 1802 North Carson Street, Suite 212, Carson City, Nevada 89701.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS

Additionally, Ms. Wildmen provides offices premises to the Company for a fee of $500 per month pursuant to an oral contract with no term. Ms. Wildmen has assigned the right to the $500 per month to the Company until such time as the Company closes on an equity or debt financing of not less than $100,000.

As of October 31, 2012 Ms. Wildmen had loaned a total $52,488, at no interest and with no term, to the Company.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

For the year ended October 31, 2012 and 2010, the total fees charged to the company for audit services, including quarterly reviews were $10,900 and $10,450 for audit-related services were $0 and $0 and for tax services and other services were $0 and $0, respectively.

PART IV

~~ITEM~~Item 15. ~~EXHIBITS~~Exhibits, ~~AND~~Financial ~~FINANCIAL~~Statement ~~STATEMENT SCHEDULE~~Schedules.

~~(a)~~ The following ~~Exhibits,~~exhibits asare ~~required~~filed byas ~~Item~~part ~~601~~ of ~~Regulation~~this ~~SK,~~Annual ~~are attached or incorporated by reference, as stated below~~Report.

Number		Description
3.1		Articles of Incorporation*
3.2		Bylaws*
31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Exhibits:

101.INS **		XBRL Instance Document
3.1	Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant*
101.SCH **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
3.1.1	Articles of Incorporation of Mascot Ventures, Inc.. filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada September 27, 2007*
101.CAL **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
3.1.2	Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation of Mascot Ventures filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Nevada December 16, 2013***
101.DEF **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
3.2	Bylaws of the Registrant*
101.LAB **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
10.1	Reorganization And Exclusive Sponsorship Licensing Agreement dated April 15, 2013**
101.PRE **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
31	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002***
32	Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley***

* ~~Incorporated~~filed byas ~~reference~~the corresponding exhibit to the ~~Registrant’s~~ Form S-1 (~~File~~Registration No. 333-164845), ~~filed~~effective ~~with~~as ~~the~~of ~~Commission~~June ~~on February 10~~15, 2010.

** ~~XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not~~ filed oras athe ~~part~~corresponding ofexhibit ato ~~registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of~~ the ~~Securities~~Current ~~Act~~Report ofon ~~1933,~~Form as8-K ~~amended, is deemed not~~ filed ~~for~~by ~~purposes of Section 18 of~~ the ~~Securities~~Company ~~Exchange~~on ~~Act~~August ~~of 1934~~17, ~~as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.~~2013

31*** filed herewith

SIGNATURES

InPursuant ~~accordance~~to ~~with~~the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	MASCOT VENTURES INC.
	EMONECO, INC.
	(Name of Registrant)
Dated: February 13, 2014	By:	/s/ Donald E. Latson
Date: January 23, 2013	By:	/s/ Wendy Wildmen
	Title:	President CEO, CFO and Treasurer
		Name:	Wendy Wildmen
		Title:	President, Chief Executive Officer, Treasurer (and principal financial officer and principal accounting officer)

32Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

EXHIBIT INDEX


Dated: February 13, 2014	By:	/s/ Donald E. Latson
	Title:	President CEO, CFO and Treasurer

Number		Description
3.1		Articles of Incorporation*
3.2		Bylaws*
31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS **		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

* Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Form S-1 (File No. 333-164845), filed with the Commission on February 10, 2010.

** XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

Filing Compare · Emoneco, Inc.