UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-K

(Mark One)

☒	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017

☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 0-27975

Mattersight Corporation

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware

36-4304577

(State or other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

200 W. Madison Street, Suite 3100

Chicago, Illinois 60606

(Address of Registrant’s Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (877) 235-6925

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class		Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share		NASDAQ Global Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or any amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or aan ~~smaller~~emerging ~~reporting~~growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” ~~and~~ “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐ Accelerated filer ☒ Non-accelerated filer ☐ (Do not check if a ~~smaller~~small reporting company) Smaller reporting company ☐ Emerging growth company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value of Common Stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, based upon the closing price per share of registrant’s Common Stock on June 30, ~~2016~~2017, as reported by The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC, is approximately $6759,~~886~~458,~~971~~238.

The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of March 62, ~~2017~~2018 was 3233,~~568~~218,~~613~~345.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of Mattersight’s Proxy Statement for its ~~2017~~2018 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of Mattersight’s fiscal year, are incorporated herein by reference into Part III where indicated; provided, that if such Proxy Statement is not filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the fiscal year end covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, an amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K shall be filed no later than the end of such 120-day period.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Item		Page
Item 1.	Business	1
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	5
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	1011
Item 2.	Properties	1011
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	1011
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	11
	PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	1112
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	1314
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1415
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	2223
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	2324
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	5253
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	5253
Item 9B.	Other Information	5253
	PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	5354
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	5455
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	5455
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	5556
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	5556
	PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	5657
Signatures		57
Exhibits		58
Exhibit Index		I-1
Signatures		61

PART I

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that are not historical facts are “forward-looking statements” and are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). ~~These~~A reader can identify these forward-looking statements, ~~which~~because ~~may~~they beare ~~identified~~not bylimited ~~use~~to ofhistorical fact or they use words such as “scheduled,” “will,” “anticipate,” “project,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “goal,” “objective,” “committed,” “intend,” “continue,” “plan,” “may,” “might,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “could,” “would,” “should,” or “will likely result,” and other ~~words~~similar expressions, and terms of similar meaning, in connection with any discussion of our prospects, financial statements, business, financial condition, revenues, results of operations, or liquidity, ~~involve~~involving risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. In addition to other factors and matters contained or incorporated in this document, important factors that could cause actual results or events to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements include, without limitation, those noted under Risk Factors included in Part I Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2016~~2017, including the following:

•

Uncertainties associated with the attraction of, and the ability to execute contracts with, new clients, the continuation of existing, and execution of new, engagements with existing clients, the conversion of free pilots to paid subscription contracts, and the timing of related client commitments;

•

Reliance on a relatively small number of clients for a significant percentage of our revenue;

•

Risks involving the variability and predictability of the number, size, scope, cost, and duration of, and revenue from, client engagements;

• Management of the other risks associated with complex client projects and new service offerings, including execution risk; ~~and~~

•

Cyber-attacks or other privacy or data security incidents, and failure to comply with privacy and data security regulations and

•

Management of growth and development of, and introduction of, new service offerings.

We cannot guarantee any future results, levels of activity, performance, or achievements. The statements made in this Annual Report on Form 10-K represent our views as of the date of this report, and it should not be assumed that the statements made in this Report remain accurate as of any future date. Moreover, we assume no obligation to update forward-looking statements, except as may be required by law. In light of Regulation FD, it is our policy not to comment on earnings, financial guidance, or operations other than through press releases, publicly announced conference calls, or other means that will constitute public disclosure for purposes of Regulation FD.

Item 1.

Business

Overview

Mattersight Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, we, us, or ours) is a leader in behavioral analytics and a pioneer in personality-based software products. Using a stack of innovative, patented applications, including predictive behavioral routing ~~and workstyle~~, performance management, quality assurance, and predictive analytics (collectively, Behavioral Analytics), we analyze and predict customer behavior based on the language exchanged between agents and customers during brand interactions. These insights are then used to facilitate more effective and effortless customer conversations, which, in turn, drive increased customer satisfaction and retention, employee engagement, and operating efficiency. Our analytics are based on millions of proprietary algorithms and the application of unique behavioral models. Our solutions have influenced hundreds of millions of shorter, more satisfying customer interactions for leading companies in the healthcare, insurance, financial services, technology, telecommunications, cable, utilities, education, hospitality, and government industries.

Mattersight Corporation (formerly known as eLoyalty Corporation), a corporation organized under State of Delaware law, was incorporated May 11, 1999, as a spin-out from TSC/ECM Inc.

Our multi-channel technology captures the unstructured data of voice interactions (conversations), related customer and employee data, and employee desktop activity, and applies millions of proprietary algorithms against those interactions. Each interaction contains hundreds of attributes that get scored and ultimately detect patterns of behavior or business process that provide the transparency and predictability necessary to enhance revenue, improve the customer experience, improve efficiency, and predict and navigate outcomes. Adaptive across industries, programs, and industry-specific processes, our Behavioral Analytics offerings enable our clients to drive measurable economic benefit through the improvement of contact center performance, customer satisfaction and retention, fraud reduction, and streamlined back office operations. Specifically, through our Behavioral Analytics offerings, we help clients:

•

Identify optimal customer/employee behavioral pairing for call routing;

•

Identify and understand customer personality;

•

Automatically measure customer satisfaction and agent performance on every analyzed call;

•

Improve rapport between agent and customer;

•

Reduce call handle times while improving customer satisfaction;

•

Identify opportunities to improve self-service applications;

•

Improve cross-sell and up-sell success rates;

•

Improve the efficiency and effectiveness of collection efforts;

•

Measure and improve supervisor effectiveness and coaching;

•

Improve agent effectiveness by analyzing key attributes of desktop usage;

•

Predict likelihood of customer attrition;

•

Predict customer satisfaction and Net Promoter Scores® without customer surveys;

•

Predict likelihood of debt repayment;

•

Predict likelihood of a sale or cross-sell; and

•

Identify fraudulent callers and improve authentication processes.

Our mission is to help brands have more effective and effortless conversations with their customers. Using a suite of innovative personality-based software applications, we can analyze and predict customer behavior based on the language exchanged during service and sales interactions. We operate a highly scalable, flexible, and adaptive application platform to enable clients to implement and operate these applications.

Types of Revenue

Through the sale of our services featuring these applications, we generate the following types of revenue:

Subscription Revenue

Subscription revenue consists of revenue derived from Mattersight’s Behavioral Analytics service offerings, including predictive behavioral routing, performance management, quality assurance, predictive analytics, and marketing managed services revenue derived from the performance of services on a continual basis.

Subscription revenue is based on a number of factors, such as the number of users to whom we provide one or more of our Behavioral Analytics offerings, the type and number of Behavioral Analytics offerings deployed to the client, and in some cases, the number of hours of calls analyzed during the relevant month of the subscription period. Subscription periods generally range from one to three years after the go-live date or, in cases where the Company contracts with a client for a short-term pilot of a Behavioral Analytics offering prior to committing to a longer subscription period, if any, the subscription or pilot periods generally range from three to twelve months after the go-live date. This revenue is recognized over the applicable subscription period as the service is performed for the client.

Other Revenue

Other revenue consists of deployment revenue, professional services revenue, and reimbursed expenses revenue.

Deployment revenue consists of planning, deployment, and training fees derived from Behavioral Analytics contracts. These fees, which are considered to be installation fees related to Behavioral Analytics subscription contracts, are deferred until the installation is complete and are then recognized over the applicable subscription or pilot period. Installation costs incurred are deferred up to an amount not to exceed the amount of deferred installation revenue and additional amounts that are recoverable based on the contractual arrangement. These costs are included in prepaid expenses and other long-term assets. Such costs are amortized over the subscription period. Costs in excess of the foregoing revenue amount are expensed in the period incurred.

Professional services revenue primarily consists of fees charged to our clients to provide post-deployment follow-on consulting services, which include custom data analysis, the implementation of enhancements, and training, as well as fees generated from our operational consulting services. The professional services are performed for our clients on a fixed-fee or time-and-materials basis. Revenue is recognized as the services are performed, with performance generally assessed on the ratio of actual hours incurred to-date compared with the total estimated hours over the entire term of the contract.

Reimbursed expenses revenue includes billable costs related to travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred while performing services for our clients. An equivalent amount of reimbursable expenses is included in total cost of other revenue.

Business Segments

We operate in a single business segment, focused primarily on Behavioral Analytics. Financial information concerning our business segment is included in Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

International Operations

Our services are currently delivered to clients in the United States, however prior to November 2015, we had also delivered services to a client in the United Kingdom. Our revenue is and has been recognized in our U.S. entity. Our long-lived assets are and have been predominately located in the United States and consist of equipment, software, furniture and fixtures, and leasehold improvements (net of accumulated depreciation and amortization).

Methods of Distribution

Subscription and other revenues are generated by direct contractual relationships with clients.

Intellectual Property Rights

General

Our ability to protect our software, methodologies, and other intellectual property is important to our success and our competitive position. We view as proprietary the software (including source code), algorithms, analyses, and other ideas, concepts, and developments that we create in order to provide, improve, and enhance our service offerings, as well as the work product we create in the course of providing services for clients. We seek to protect our intellectual property rights in these developments and work product by relying on a combination of patent, copyright, trademark, and trade secret law, and confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements with our employees and third parties.

Patents

As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, we held ~~thirty~~forty-~~one~~five U.S. patents and one European patent and have applied for over twenty patents. These patents cover a broad range of our analytics capabilities, including methods for analyzing language to assess customer personality, routing customers based on personality in real time, optimizing routing to improve agent performance, and analyzing data to improve employee performance. Our issued patents will expire between 2025 and ~~2034~~2036.

Trademarks

We have obtained U.S. federal trademark registration for the MATTERSIGHT word mark and our tagline “The Chemistry of Conversation”. We believe that the registration of the MATTERSIGHT word mark and tagline in the United States is material to our operations.

Licenses

A majority of our clients require that we grant to them licenses in and to the intellectual property rights associated with the work product we create in the course of providing services. In some cases, our clients require assignment of ownership in the intellectual property rights to such work product, typically where such work product incorporates their confidential information or would provide them some competitive advantage in their industry. Absent an agreement to the contrary, each assignment of ownership in intellectual property rights would result in our inability to reuse the relevant work product with other clients. As a result, it is our practice to retain the rights in the underlying core intellectual property on which such work product is based, including methodologies, workplans, and software, as well as residual know-how. If we are unable to retain such rights, it is our policy to obtain from our clients a broad license to sell service offerings using such work product to other clients.

Seasonality

We typically experience modest increases in revenue and earnings from our healthcare clients during the fourth quarter due to annual healthcare enrollment periods and increased claims processing at year-end. We also see increases in revenue from our retail clients due to the peak shopping season during the fourth quarter. Any other seasonal impact to our revenue and earnings is limited, as a significant portion of our revenue is earned through our Behavioral Analytics subscription services, which is of a recurring nature.

Clients

~~During~~Highest ~~2016,~~Revenue ~~our~~Generating five and ten largest clients accounted for 73% and 87% of our total revenue, respectively. During 2015, our five and ten largest clients accounted for 73% and 89% of our total revenue, respectively. During 2014, our five and ten largest clients accounted for 75% and 91% of our total revenue, respectively. In 2016, there were three clients that accounted for 10% or more of total revenueClients: United HealthCare Services, Inc.; Progressive Casualty Insurance Company; and CVS Caremark Corporation, which accounted for 33%, 15%, and 11% of total revenue, respectively. In 2015, there were three clients that accounted for 10% or more of total revenue: United HealthCare Services, Inc.; Progressive Casualty Insurance Company; and CVS Caremark Corporation, which accounted for 31%, 15%, and 13% of total revenue, respectively. In 2014, there were three clients that accounted for 10% or more of total revenue: United HealthCare Services, Inc.; Progressive Casualty Insurance Company; and Health Care Service Corporation, which accounted for 25%, 20%, and 11% of total revenue, respectively. For 2016, 2015, and 2014, ten, nine, and seven clients, respectively, each accounted for over $1 million of total revenue. See Note Two—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

	(Percentage of Total Revenue)
	2017			2016			2015
Top 5 Clients		71	%		73	%		73	%
Top 10 Clients		86	%		87	%		89	%

Clients Accounting for 10% or More of Total Revenue:

	(Percentage of Total Revenue)
	2017			2016			2015
United HealthCare Services, Inc.		28	%		33	%		31	%
CVS Caremark Corporation		16	%		15	%		13	%
TriWest Healthcare Alliance Corp		14	%		9	%		2	%
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company		8	%		11	%		15	%

Clients Accounting for $1 Million or More of Total Revenue:

Year	Clients
2017		11
2016		10
2015		9

See Note Two—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Competition

Although we believe the manner in which we provide Behavioral Analytics, and our benefits, to be unique, we nonetheless operate in a highly competitive and rapidly changing market and compete with a variety of organizations that offer services that may be viewed as similar to ours. These competitive organizations include data analytics solutions providers, voice recording and voice analytic services providers and software licensors, call routing solution providers, and strategic consulting firms. We believe few competitors offer the full range and depth of services that we can provide, but they may compete with us on individual factors such as expertise, price, or capacity.

Many of our competitors have longer operating histories, more clients, longer relationships with their clients, greater brand or name recognition, and significantly greater financial, technical, marketing, and public relations resources than we do. As a result, our competitors may be in a better position to respond quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in client requirements. They may also develop and promote their products and services more effectively than we do. New market entrants also pose a threat to our business. Existing or future competitors may develop or offer solutions that are comparable or superior to ours at a lower price.

Environmental Issues

There are no known material issues regarding our compliance with any Federal, state, or local environmental regulations.

Employees

As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, we employed ~~265~~281 persons, none of whom is represented by a union. We consider our employee relations to be good.

Available Information and Other

Our principal internet address is www.Mattersight.com. Our Annual, Quarterly, and Current Reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q, and 8-K, and any amendments thereto, as well as the Forms 3, 4, and 5 beneficial ownership reports filed with respect to our stock, are made available free of charge on our website as soon as reasonably practicable after the reports have been filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). However, the information found on our website is not part of this or any other report filed by us with the SEC. These reports may also be obtained at the SEC’s public reference room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Information regarding the operation of the SEC’s public reference room may be obtained by calling the SEC at (800) SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains reports, proxy statements, and other information regarding SEC registrants, including Mattersight.

Our executive office is currently located at 200 W. Madison Street, Suite 3100, Chicago, Illinois 60606 and our main telephone number is (877) 235-6925.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

There are a number of risks and uncertainties that could adversely affect our business and our overall financial performance. In addition to the matters discussed elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we believe the more significant of such risks and uncertainties include the following:

We have not realized an operating profit in ~~seventeen~~eighteen years and there is no guarantee that we will realize an operating profit in the foreseeable future.

As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, we had an accumulated deficit of $~~263~~279.14 million. We expect to continue to use cash and incur operating expenses to support our growth, including costs associated with recruiting, training, and managing our sales force, costs to develop and acquire new technology, and promotional costs associated with reaching new clients. These investments, which typically are made in advance of revenue, may not yield an offsetting increase in revenue. As a result of these factors, our future revenue and income potential is uncertain. Even if we achieve profitability, we may not be able to sustain or increase profitability on a quarterly or annual basis. Our failure to become and remain profitable would depress our value and could impair our ability to raise capital, expand our business, maintain our product development efforts, diversify our product offerings, or continue our operations. A decline in our value could also cause you to lose all or part of your investment.

Our financial results are subject to significant fluctuations because of many factors, any of which could adversely affect our stock price.

In some future periods, our operating results may be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors. In this event, the price of our publicly-traded securities may fall. Our revenue and operating results may vary significantly due to a number of factors, many of which are not in our control. We may incur an impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets if our financial results are adversely impacted by these factors and we continue to incur financial losses or our stock price declines. These factors include:

•

Our ability to continue to grow our revenue and meet anticipated growth targets;

•

Our ability to maintain our current relationships, and develop new relationships, with clients, service providers, and business partners;

•

Unanticipated cancellations or deferrals of, or reductions in the scope of, our major Behavioral Analytics contracts;

•

The length of the sales cycle associated with our solutions;

•

Our ability to successfully introduce new, and upgrade our existing, service offerings for clients;

•

Our ability to respond effectively to competition;

•

The mix of our service offerings sold in any period;

•

The cost and potential outcomes of litigation, which could have a material adverse effect on our business;

•

Future accounting pronouncements or changes in our accounting policies; and

•

General economic conditions.

If we are unable to address these risks, our business, results of operations, and prospects could suffer.

We depend on a limited number of clients for a significant portion of our revenue, and the loss of a significant client or a substantial decline in the size or scope of deployments for a significant client, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We derive, and expect to continue to derive for the foreseeable future, a significant portion of our total revenue from a limited number of clients. See Clients in Part I Item 1 and ~~2016~~2017 Compared ~~2015~~to 2016 included in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in Part II Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information on the portion of our total revenue derived from these clients. To the extent that any significant client uses less of our services or terminates its relationship with us, as may occur as clients respond to conditions affecting their own businesses, our total revenue could decline substantially and that could significantly harm our business. United HealthCare Services, Inc., our largest customer in 2017, has expressed an intent to use less of our services in 2018, which could have a material impact on revenue. In addition, because a high percentage of our revenue is dependent on a relatively small number of clients, delayed payments by a few of our larger clients could result in a reduction of our available cash, which in turn may cause fluctuation in our Days Sales Outstanding.

We depend on good relations with our clients, and any harm to these good relations may materially and adversely affect our business and our ability to compete effectively.

To attract and retain clients, we depend to a large extent on our relationships with our clients and our reputation for high quality analytics and related services. If a client is not satisfied with our services, it may be damaging to our reputation and business. Any defects or errors in our services or solutions or failure to meet our clients’ expectations could result in:

•

Delayed or lost revenue;

•

Obligations to provide additional services to a client at a reduced fee or at no charge;

•

Negative publicity, which could damage our reputation and adversely affect our ability to attract or retain clients; and

•

Claims for damages against us, regardless of our responsibility for such failure.

If we fail to meet our contractual obligations with our clients, then we could be subject to legal liability or loss of clients. Although our contracts include provisions to limit our exposure to legal claims related to the services and solutions we provide, these provisions may not protect us, or protect us sufficiently, in all cases.

We must maintain our reputation and expand our name recognition to remain competitive.

We believe that establishing and maintaining a good reputation and brand name is critical for attracting and expanding our targeted client base and we are investing substantially in marketing in order to expand our name recognition in the marketplace for our services and solutions. If potential clients do not know the types of solutions we provide, or if our reputation is damaged, then we may become less competitive or lose our market share. Promotion and enhancement of our name and brand will depend largely on both the efficacy of our relatively nascent marketing efforts and our success in providing high quality services, software, and solutions, neither of which can be assured.

Our clients use our solutions for critical applications. If clients do not perceive our solutions to be effective or of higher quality than those available from our competitors, or if our solutions result in errors, defects, or other performance problems, then our brand name and reputation could be materially and adversely affected, we could lose potential sales and existing customers, including through early termination of our contracts, our ability to operate our business may be impaired, and our business may suffer.

Our industry is very competitive and, if we fail to compete successfully, our market share and business will be adversely affected.

We operate in a highly competitive and rapidly changing market and compete with a variety of organizations that offer services that may be viewed as similar to ours. These competitive organizations include data analytics solutions providers, voice recording and voice analytic service providers and software licensors, call routing solution providers, and strategic consulting firms. We compete with these organizations on factors such as expertise, price, and capacity.

Many of our competitors have longer operating histories, more clients, longer relationships with their clients, greater brand or name recognition, more registered patents, and significantly greater financial, technical, marketing, and public relations resources than we do. As a result, our competitors may be in a better position to respond quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in client requirements. They may also develop and promote their products and services more effectively than we do. New market entrants also pose a threat to our business. Existing or future competitors may develop or offer solutions that are comparable or superior to ours at a lower price.

In addition, if one or more of our competitors were to merge or partner with another of our competitors, the change in the competitive landscape could adversely affect our ability to compete effectively. We may also lose clients that merge with or are acquired by companies using a competitor's offering or an internally-developed tool. If we cannot compete successfully against our current and future competitors, our business may be harmed.

We must keep pace with the rapid rate of innovation in our industry in order to build our business.

The data analytics market, and particularly behavioral analytics, is relatively new and rapidly evolving. Our future business depends in part upon continued growth in the acceptance and use of Behavioral Analytics by our current and prospective clients. Their acceptance and usage in turn may depend upon factors such as: the actual or perceived benefits of adoption of Behavioral Analytics and related methodologies and technologies, including the predictability of a meaningful return on investment, cost efficiencies, or other measurable economic benefits; the actual or perceived reliability, scalability, ease of use, and access to such new technologies and methodologies; and the willingness to adopt new business methods. Furthermore, our future growth depends on our continuing ability to innovate in the field of data analytics and to incorporate emerging industry standards.

We cannot assure that we will be successful in anticipating or responding to these challenges on a timely or competitive basis or at all, or that our ideas and solutions will be successful in the marketplace. In addition, new or disruptive technologies and methodologies by our competitors may make our service or solution offerings uncompetitive. Any of these circumstances could significantly harm our business and financial results.

Because our services and solutions are sophisticated, we must devote significant time and effort to our sales and installation processes, with significant risk of loss if we are not successful.

Because our services and solutions are not simple, mass-market items with which our potential clients are already familiar, it is necessary for us to devote significant time and effort to the process of educating our potential clients about the benefits and value of our services and solutions as part of the sales process. In addition, because our services and solutions are sophisticated and in most cases are not readily usable by clients without our assistance in integration and configuration, training, and/or analysis, we must devote significant time during the installation and subscription process in order to ensure that our services and solutions are successfully deployed. These efforts increase the time and difficulty of completing transactions, make it more difficult to efficiently deploy our limited resources, and create risk that we will have invested in an opportunity that ultimately does not come to fruition. If we are unable to demonstrate the benefits and value of our services and solutions to clients and efficiently convert our sales leads into successful sales and installations, our results of operations may be adversely affected.

A breach of security, disruption or failure of our information technology systems or those of our third-party service providers, including any perceived vulnerability therein could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We may be affected by software viruses or similar technology in the future, which could compromise our operations. Further, our information technology systems or the third-party systems that we interface with may be vulnerable to physical break-ins, hackers, improper employee or contractor access, programming errors, attacks by third parties or similar disruptive problems, resulting in the potential misappropriation of our proprietary information, or the confidential information of our clients, harm to our products or interruptions of our services. Any compromise of our security, whether as a result of our own information technology systems or third-party systems that they interface with, could substantially disrupt our operations, harm our reputation and reduce demand for our products and services, and in the case of breaches to the confidential or personally-identifiable data of the customers of our clients significant liability.

The unauthorized disclosure of the confidential customer data that we maintain could result in a significant loss of business and subject us to substantial liability.

In providing Behavioral Analytics, we record and analyze telephone calls and other interactions between our clients’ call center and back office agents and their customers. These interactions may contain numerous references to highly sensitive confidential or personally-identifiable data of the customers of our clients, and many of our clients are required to comply with Federal and state laws concerning privacy and security, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999. In addition, we have made certain contractual commitments to our clients regarding this confidential data.

~~increase~~The ~~materially. In our contracts, we generally agree to indemnify our clients for expenses and liabilities resulting from~~ unauthorized ~~access to or~~ disclosure of the confidential ~~data,~~customer ~~such as those arising from~~ data ~~breach~~that ~~notification~~we ~~requirements.~~maintain ~~These~~could ~~indemnity~~result ~~obligations~~in ~~are generally not subject to contractual limitations on liability. As~~ a ~~result,~~significant ~~the~~loss ~~amount~~ of ~~liability~~business weand ~~could~~subject ~~incur~~us into ~~connection~~substantial ~~with these indemnity obligations could exceed the revenue we receive from the client under the applicable contract~~liability.

In providing Behavioral Analytics, we record and analyze telephone calls and other interactions between our clients’ call center and back office agents and their customers. These interactions may contain numerous references to highly sensitive confidential or personally-identifiable data of the customers of our clients, and many of our clients are required to comply with federal, state, and foreign laws concerning privacy and security, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 and the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999. In addition, we have made certain contractual commitments to our clients regarding this confidential data.

In light of the highly-confidential information that we record and maintain, our clients require that we agree not to limit our liability in the event of a security breach resulting in the loss of, or unauthorized access to, personally-identifiable or other confidential data. As a result, the disclosure or loss of such data could result in the considerable diminution of our business and prospects and could subject us to substantial liability. While we have extensive security measures in place, they may be breached through third-party action, including by intentional misconduct of computer hackers, employee error or malfeasance, or otherwise and result in unauthorized access to our systems, data, proprietary information or intellectual property, or customer data.

In addition, the laws, regulations, and industry standards governing these matters are changing rapidly. It is possible that the resources we devote to comply with such laws, regulations, and industry standards, and our clients’ particular requirements, could increase materially. In our contracts, we generally agree to indemnify our clients for expenses and liabilities resulting from unauthorized access to or disclosure of confidential data, such as those arising from data breach notification requirements. These indemnity obligations are generally not subject to contractual limitations on liability. As a result, the amount of liability we could incur in connection with these indemnity obligations could exceed the revenue we receive from the client under the applicable contract.

Our financial results could be adversely affected by economic and political conditions and the effects of these conditions on our clients’ businesses and levels of business activity.

Economic and political conditions globally affect our clients’ businesses and the markets they serve. A severe and/or prolonged economic downturn or a negative or uncertain political climate could adversely affect our clients’ financial conditions and the levels of business activity of our clients and the industries we serve. This may reduce demand for our services or depress pricing of those services and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. In addition, these economic conditions may cause our clients to delay payments for services we have provided to them, resulting in a negative impact to our cash flow. If we are unable to successfully anticipate changing economic and political conditions, then we may be unable to effectively plan for and respond to those changes, and our business could be negatively affected.

We rely heavily on our senior management team for the success of our business.

Given the highly specialized nature of our services, senior management must have a thorough understanding of our service offerings as well as the skills and experience necessary to manage the organization. If one or more members of our senior management team leaves and we cannot replace them with a suitable candidate quickly, then we could experience difficulty in managing our business properly, and this could harm our business prospects, client relationships, employee morale, and results of operations.

Our ability to recruit talented professionals and retain our existing professionals is critical to the success of our business.

We believe that our success depends substantially on our ability to attract, train, motivate, and retain highly skilled management, strategic, technical, product development, data analysis, and other key professional employees. Our business straddles the information-technology and data analytics services industries, which are people-intensive and face shortages of qualified personnel, especially those with specialized skills or experience. We compete with other companies to recruit and hire from this limited pool, particularly in Austin, Texas, the location of our ~~research~~product ~~and~~ development team, and in Chicago, Illinois, the location of our data science and analytics teams.

If we cannot hire and retain qualified personnel, or if a significant number of our current employees should leave, and we have difficulty replacing such persons, then we could potentially suffer the loss of client relationships or new business opportunities and our business could be seriously harmed. In addition, there is no guarantee that the employee and client non-solicitation and non-competition agreements we have entered into with our senior professionals would deter them from departing us for our competitors or that such agreements would be upheld and enforced by a court or other arbiter across all jurisdictions where we engage in business.

We have a limited ability to protect our intellectual property rights, which are important to our success and competitive position.

Our ability to protect our software, algorithms, databases, methodologies, and other intellectual property is important to our success and our competitive position. We view as proprietary the software (including source code), algorithms, databases, analysis, and other ideas, concepts, and developments that we create in order to provide, improve, and enhance our service offerings, as well as the work product we create in the course of providing services for clients. We seek to protect our intellectual property rights in these developments and work product by applying for patents, copyrights, and trademarks, as appropriate, as well as by enforcing applicable trade secret laws and contractual restrictions on scope of use, disclosure, copying, reverse engineering, and assignment.

Despite our efforts to protect our intellectual property rights from unauthorized use or disclosure, others may attempt to disclose, obtain, or use our rights. The steps we take may not be adequate to prevent or deter infringement or other misappropriation of our intellectual property rights. In addition, we may not detect unauthorized use of, or take timely and effective actions to enforce and protect, our intellectual property rights. Furthermore, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights may be met with defenses, counterclaims, and countersuits attacking the validity and enforceability of our intellectual property rights or alleging that we infringe the counterclaimant's own intellectual property. Third parties may challenge the validity or ownership of our intellectual property, and these challenges could cause us to lose our rights, in whole or in part, to our intellectual property or narrow the scope of our rights such that they no longer provide meaningful protection.

We may be required to obtain licenses from others to refine, develop, market, and deliver current and new services and solutions. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain any of these licenses on commercially reasonable terms or at all, or that rights granted by these licenses ultimately will be valid and enforceable.

If we fail to meaningfully protect our intellectual property, our business, brand, operating results, and financial condition could be materially harmed.

Others could claim that our services, products, or solutions infringe upon their intellectual property rights or violate contractual protections.

We or our clients may be subject to claims that our services, products, or solutions, or the products of our software providers or other alliance partners, infringe upon the intellectual property rights of others. Any such infringement claims may result in substantial costs, divert management attention and other resources, harm our reputation, and prevent us from offering some services, products, or solutions. A successful infringement claim against us could materially and adversely affect our business.

In our contracts with clients, we agree to indemnify our clients for expenses and liabilities resulting from claimed infringement by our services, products, or solutions, in most cases excluding third-party components, of the intellectual property rights of others. In some instances, the amount of these indemnity obligations may be greater than the revenue we receive from the client under the applicable contract. In addition, we may develop work product in connection with specific projects for our clients. Although our contracts with our clients generally provide that we retain the ownership rights to our work product, it is possible that clients may assert rights to, and seek to limit our ability to resell or reuse, our work product. Furthermore, in some cases we assign to clients the copyright and, at times, other intellectual property rights, in and to some aspects of the software, documentation, or other work product developed for these clients in connection with these projects, which limits our ability to resell or reuse this intellectual property.

Increasing government regulation could cause us to lose clients or impair our business.

We are subject not only to laws and regulations applicable to businesses generally, but we are also subject to certain U.S. and foreign laws and regulations applicable to our service offerings, including, but not limited to, those related to data privacy and security, electronic commerce, and call recording. Laws and regulations enacted in the United States, both at the state and federal level, as well as significant new rules issued with respect thereto, impose substantial requirements relating to the privacy and security of personal data, as well as the reporting of breaches with respect to personal data. Legislation that may be enacted in the future may add further requirements in these and other areas. In addition, we may be affected indirectly by legislation that impacts our existing and prospective clients, who may pass along to us by contract their legal obligations in these and other areas. Any such laws and regulations therefore could affect our existing business relationships or prevent us from obtaining new clients.

It may be difficult for us to access debt or equity markets to meet our financial needs.

In the event, for any reason, we need to raise additional funds in the future, through public or private debt or equity financings, such funds may not be available or may not be available on terms favorable to us. Additionally, the terms of the ~~Loan~~loan ~~and~~agreement ~~Security Agreement~~ we entered into with ~~Hercules~~CIBC ~~Capital,~~Bank ~~Inc.~~USA f/k/a The PrivateBank and Trust Company (~~Hercules~~CIBC) on ~~August~~June 129, ~~2016~~2017 (the Loan Agreement) limits our ability to enter into a public or private debt financing. The failure by us to obtain such financing, if needed, may have a material adverse effect upon our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

The market price of our common stock is likely to be volatile and could subject us to litigation.

The trading price of our common stock has been, and is likely to continue to be, volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. In addition, the trading prices of the securities of technology companies in general have been highly volatile, and the volatility in market price and trading volume of securities is often unrelated or disproportionate to the financial performance of the companies issuing the securities. In addition to the factors discussed in this Risk Factors section and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, factors affecting the market price of our common stock include:

•

actual or anticipated changes in our earnings or fluctuations in our operating results or in the expectations of securities analysts;

•

price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time;

•

significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of comparable companies;

•

changes in the market perception of behavioral and personality-based software products generally or in the effectiveness of our solutions in particular;

•

announcements of technological innovations, new products, strategic alliances, or significant agreements by us or by our competitors;

•

litigation involving us;

•

investors' general perception of us;

•

changes in general economic, industry, and market conditions and trends; and

•

recruitment or departure of key personnel.

In addition, if the market for technology stocks or the stock market in general experiences uneven investor confidence, the market price of our common stock could decline for reasons unrelated to our business, operating results or financial condition. The market price of our common stock might also decline in reaction to events that affect other companies within, or outside, our industry even if these events do not directly affect us. Some companies that have experienced volatility in the trading price of their stock have been the subject of securities class action litigation. If we are the subject of such litigation, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management's attention and resources from our business.

Because we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future, capital appreciation, if any, will be your sole source of gains and you may never receive a return on your investment.

You should not rely on an investment in our common stock to provide dividend income. We have not declared or paid cash dividends on our common stock to date. In addition, the terms of our Loan Agreement with ~~Hercules~~CIBC, and any future debt agreements may, preclude us from paying dividends. As a result, capital appreciation, if any, of our common stock will be your sole source of gain for the foreseeable future. Investors seeking cash dividends should not purchase our common stock.

Our operating results may be negatively affected if we are required to collect sales tax or other transaction taxes on all or a portion of sales in jurisdictions where we are currently not collecting and reporting tax.

Current economic and political conditions make sales and other transaction tax laws in many state, local, and foreign jurisdictions subject to reassessment and change. If a taxing authority were to successfully assert that we have not properly collected sales or other transaction taxes, or if sales or other transaction tax laws or the interpretation thereof were to change, and we were unable to enforce the terms of our contracts with customers that give us the right to reimbursement for assessed sales taxes, we could incur significant tax liabilities. Increased taxability of our products and services could increase our administrative costs, discourage clients from purchasing our products and services, or otherwise substantially harm our business and results of operations.

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments.

Not applicable.

Item 2.

Properties.

Our principal physical properties employed in our business consist of our leased office facilities in Chicago, Illinois; Edina, Minnesota; and Austin, Texas. Our executive offices are located at 200 West Madison Street, Suite 3100, Chicago, Illinois 60606. The initial lease term for this property, which became effective on ~~July~~June 1, 2015, terminates on July 31, 2022. ~~The~~This lease includes one five-year renewal option. The lease term for Edina, Minnesota, which became effective on June 1, 2011, was renewed until August 31, 2024. We ended the lease at one of our facilities in Austin, Texas on May 1, 2017 and entered into a lease at a new location in Austin, which became effective on April 1, 2016 and terminates on August 31, 2023.

Our total employable space is approximately 6148,000 square feet. We do not own any real estate. We believe that our leased facilities are appropriate for our current business requirements.

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings.

From time to time, we have been subject to legal claims arising in connection with ~~its~~our business and the results of these claims, when they arise, cannot be predicted with certainty. There are no asserted claims against us that, in the opinion of management, if adversely decided, would have a material effect on our business, financial position, results of operations, or prospects.

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

PART II.

Item 5.

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters, and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

Our common stock, par value $0.01 per share (Common Stock), is traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol MATR. The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low sales prices of our Common Stock on a quarterly basis, as reported on the NASDAQ Global Market.

	High		Low
2017
Fourth Quarter	$	2.90	$	2.40
Third Quarter		3.00		2.10
Second Quarter		3.70		2.35
First Quarter		4.05		3.30
2016
Fourth Quarter	$	4.40	$	3.00
Third Quarter		4.65		3.50
Second Quarter		4.38		3.23
First Quarter		6.70		3.85
2015
Fourth Quarter	$	8.10	$	6.25
Third Quarter		8.00		5.59
Second Quarter		7.49		5.56
First Quarter		7.50		4.75

There were approximately ~~142~~105 ~~owners~~holders of record of Common Stock as of March 62, ~~2017~~2018. The last reported sale price of Common Stock on the NASDAQ Global Market on March 62, ~~2017~~2018 was $32.7530.

See Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters included in Part III Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for more information about securities authorized for issuance under our various compensation plans.

Sale of Unregistered Securities

InOn ~~connection~~February 23, ~~with~~2017, ~~our~~we ~~Loan~~entered ~~Agreement~~into ~~with~~a ~~Hercules,~~definitive wepurchase ~~also~~agreement ~~entered~~for ~~into~~the asale ~~Warrant~~of ~~Agreement~~5,328,187 ~~with~~shares ~~Hercules~~of ~~evidencing~~our ~~Hercules’s~~common ~~right~~stock to ~~purchase~~certain ~~shares~~investors ofand ~~Common~~certain ~~Stock~~officers atand andirectors ~~exercise~~in ~~price~~a ofprivate $3placement.50 ~~per~~Under ~~share~~the (terms of the ~~Warrant)~~agreement, we raised approximately $16. ~~The~~0 million ~~Warrant~~in ~~initially~~gross isproceeds ~~exercisable~~by ~~for~~selling ~~357~~5,~~142~~228,187 shares ofto ~~Common~~certain ~~Stock. If~~investors ~~tranche~~at 3a isprice ~~fully~~of ~~funded~~$3.00 ~~under~~per ~~the~~share ~~Loan~~and ~~Agreement~~by selling 100,000 ~~then~~shares ~~the~~to ~~Warrant~~certain ~~automatically~~officers ~~will~~and ~~become~~directors ~~exercisable~~(including ~~for~~certain anof ~~additional~~their ~~71,428~~affiliates) ~~shares~~at a price of ~~Common~~$3.45 ~~Stock~~per share. The ~~exercise~~shares ~~price~~represented ~~and~~approximately 20% of the ~~number~~issued and ~~type~~outstanding of shares ~~underlying~~of ~~the~~common ~~Warrant~~stock ~~are~~immediately ~~subject~~prior to ~~adjustment~~the inissuance. ~~the~~On ~~event~~March 1, of2017, ~~specified~~we ~~merger~~received ~~events~~aggregate gross proceeds, anet ~~reclassification~~of fees, of ~~Common~~$14.8 million. ~~Stock~~Proceeds are being used for general corporate, aworking ~~subdivision~~capital, orand ~~combination~~debt ofrepayment ~~Common~~purposes. ~~Stock~~Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, orwhich inacted as the ~~event~~sole ofplacement ~~certain~~agent ~~dividend~~for ~~payments. The~~the ~~Warrant~~offering, isreceived ~~exercisable~~a ~~until~~commission ~~August~~of $1~~, 2023~~. ~~Upon exercise~~1 million, ~~the~~and ~~aggregate~~was ~~exercise~~reimbursed ~~price~~for ~~may~~its beout-of-pocket ~~paid,~~expenses. atThe ~~Hercules~~company’s ~~election,~~registration instatement ~~cash~~on orForm onS-3 a(File ~~net~~No. ~~issuance~~333-217290) ~~basis,~~was ~~based~~filed ~~upon~~with the ~~fair~~SEC ~~market~~on ~~value~~April 13, of2017 ~~Common~~and ~~Stock~~declared ateffective by the ~~time~~SEC ofon ~~exercise~~April 26, 2017.

The ~~issuance~~Shares ofwere offered and will be sold to the ~~Warrant~~purchasers ~~was~~under the purchase agreement in transactions exempt from registration under the ~~registration~~Securities ~~requirements~~Act or state securities laws, in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Rule 506 of ~~1933,~~Regulation asD ~~amended,~~of ~~pursuant~~the toSecurities Act and in reliance on similar exemptions under applicable state laws. Each of the purchasers represented that it is an ~~exemption~~accredited ~~provided~~investor bywithin ~~Section~~the 4meaning of Rule 501(a)~~(2)~~ ~~thereof~~of asRegulation aD, ~~transaction~~and byis anacquiring ~~issuer~~its shares for investment only and not ~~involving~~with a view towards, or for resale in connection with, the public ~~offering~~sale or distribution thereof. The shares were offered without any general solicitation by us or our representatives.

1112

Stock Performance Graph

The following graph compares the cumulative total stockholder return on Common Stock with the cumulative total return of (i) a peer group of other publicly-traded information-technology consulting companies selected by us (the Peer Group Index), and (ii) the NASDAQ Global Market Index. Cumulative total stockholder return is based on the period from January 1, ~~2012~~2013 through December 31, ~~2016~~2017. The comparison assumes that $100 was invested on January 1, ~~2012~~2013 in each of Mattersight Common Stock, the Peer Group Index, and the NASDAQ Global Market Index, and that any and all dividends were reinvested.

Comparative Cumulative Total Return for Mattersight Corporation,

Peer Group Index, and NASDAQ Global Market Index

12/31/11

12/31/12

12/31/13

12/31/14

12/31/15

12/31/16

12/31/12

12/31/13

12/31/14

12/31/15

12/31/16

12/31/17

Mattersight Common Stock

100.00

~~106~~96.8838

~~103~~125.0175

~~134~~131.4199

~~141~~74.0845

7951.5631

Peer Group Index(1)

100.00

~~100~~132.2906

~~132~~172.4527

~~172~~155.7874

~~156~~166.2024

~~166~~213.7391

NASDAQ Global Market Index

100.00

~~116~~141.4163

~~165~~162.4709

~~188~~173.6933

~~200~~187.3219

~~216~~242.5429

(1)	The Peer Group Index consists of Verint Systems, Inc. and Nice Systems Limited.

Repurchase of Equity Securities

The following table provides information relating to our repurchase of shares of ~~its~~our Common Stock in the fourth quarter of ~~2016~~2017. These repurchases reflect shares withheld upon vesting of restricted stock to satisfy tax-withholding obligations.

Period	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid Per Share
October 1, 2016 – October 31, 2016		10,460	$	4.02
October 1, 2017 – October 31, 2017		—	$	—
November 1, 2016 – November 30, 2016		18,403	$	3.72
November 1, 2017 – November 30, 2017		41,895	$	2.70
December 1, 2016 – December 31, 2016		688	$	3.70
December 1, 2017 – December 31, 2017		1,572	$	2.60
Total		2943,~~551~~467	$	32.8270

Dividends

Historically, we have not paid cash dividends on our Common Stock, and we do not expect to do so in the future. Under the terms of ~~its~~our certificate of designations, our 7% Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (the Series B Stock) accrues dividends at a rate of 7% per year, payable semi-annually in January and July if declared by our board of directors. If not declared, unpaid dividends are cumulative and accrue at the rate of 7% per annum. Total accrued dividends for the periods July 1, 2012 through December 31, ~~2016~~2017 are $23.62 million, which will continue to be accrued until they are declared by the board of directors. Payment of future dividends on the Series B Stock will be determined by our board of directors based on our outlook and macroeconomic conditions.

The amount of each dividend accrual would decrease by any conversions of the Series B Stock into Common Stock, as Series B Stock conversions require us to pay accrued but unpaid dividends at the time of conversion. Conversions of Series B Stock became 13

12The amount of each dividend accrual would decrease by any conversions of the Series B Stock into Common Stock, as Series B Stock conversions require us to pay accrued but unpaid dividends at the time of conversion. Conversions of Series B Stock became permissible at the option of the holder after June 19, 2002. For further discussion see Liquidity and Capital Resources included in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

permissible at the option of the holder after June 19, 2002. For further discussion see Liquidity and Capital Resources included in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Equity Compensation Information

See Part III, Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information regarding shares of Common Stock that may be issued under our existing equity compensation plans.

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data.

The following tables summarize our selected consolidated financial data. This information should be read in conjunction with Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and notes thereto, which are included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The selected consolidated financial data in this section is not intended to replace the Consolidated Financial Statements of the Company and the notes thereto. Our historical results are not necessarily indicative of our future results.

	(In thousands, except per share data)(1)
	December 31, 2016			December 31, 2015			December 31, 2014			December 31, 2013			December 31, 2012
	December 31, 2017			December 31, 2016			December 31, 2015			December 31, 2014			December 31, 2013
Total revenue	$	4246,~~097~~510		$	3942,~~912~~097		$	3039,~~319~~912		$	3430,~~494~~319		$	3334,~~863~~494
Loss from continuing operations	$	(2016,~~977~~320	)	$	(1520,~~681~~977	)	$	(1415,~~232~~681	)	$	(1114,~~172~~232	)	$	(1511,~~470~~172	)
Net loss available to common stockholders	$	(2116,~~563~~904	)	$	(1621,~~269~~563	)	$	(1416,~~821~~269	)	$	(1114,~~761~~821	)	$	(1511,~~881~~761	)
Basic loss from continuing operations per share	$	(0.8656	)	$	(0.7086	)	$	(0.7470	)	$	(0.7074	)	$	(10.0170	)
Total assets	$	4539,~~564~~935		$	4045,~~402~~564		$	3240,~~078~~402		$	3032,~~749~~078		$	3130,~~362~~749
Long-term debt	$	2017,~~839~~056		$	—20,839		$	—		$	—		$	—
Series B Stock	$	8,~~354~~353		$	8,~~388~~354		$	8,~~406~~388		$	8,~~411~~406		$	8,411
Capital leases	$	3,~~584~~157		$	3,~~433~~584		$	23,~~813~~433		$	2,~~832~~813		$	2,~~305~~832

(1)	See Note One—Description of Business and Note Two—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for business discussion.

1314

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Selected Financial Data and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Overview

We are a leader in behavioral analytics and a pioneer in personality-based software products. Using a stack of innovative, patented applications, Mattersight analyzes and predicts customer behavior based on the language exchanged between agents and customers during brand interactions. These insights are then used to facilitate more effective and effortless customer conversations, which, in turn, drive increased customer satisfaction and retention, employee engagement, and operating efficiency.

Business Metrics

We regularly review our business metrics to evaluate our business, measure our performance, identify trends in our business, prepare financial projections, and make strategic decisions.

ACV Bookings. We estimate annual contract value (ACV) of bookings as equal to the projected subscription and other billings for new customer contracts executed in the quarter, realized growth on existing customer accounts beyond the original booking, and committed future growth. We regularly review ACV bookings on a rolling four quarter basis and also review the percentage of ACV bookings generated by new customers. We use this to measure the effectiveness of our sales and marketing investments and as an indicator of potential future billings.

Backlog. We calculate backlog as the ACV of bookings for which we have not yet deployed our services to the customer. We use this to measure the average time to deploy our bookings and as an indicator of potential future billings.

Gross Margin. We calculate gross margin as the difference between our total revenue and the total cost of revenue, divided by total revenue, expressed as a percentage. We use this to measure the efficiency of our service delivery organization.

Performance Highlights

The following table presents our performance on key metrics for the periods presented:

	2016
	2017
	(in thousands, except percentage data)
	(In millions, except percentage data)
	1st Quarter			2nd Quarter			3rd Quarter			4th Quarter			Year
ACV bookings	53.45			42.45			45.72				62.48		~~20.9~~	14.0
Rolling four quarters ACV bookings	~~25.1~~	19.0			2317.71		2117.56			~~20.9~~	14.0		~~20.9~~	14.0
Backlog	1714.95				2313.1		1914.26			128.69			128.69
Gross Margin		6869	%		6569	%		6773	%		6973	%		6771	%

	2015
	2016
	(in thousands, except percentage data)
	(In millions, except percentage data)
	1st Quarter			2nd Quarter			3rd Quarter			4th Quarter			Year
ACV bookings	35.14			54.84			64.97				76.04		~~22.7~~	20.9
Rolling 4 quarters ACV bookings	1725.1				1923.07		2221.65			2220.79			2220.79
Backlog	817.19				1023.01		1119.72			1512.16			1512.16
Gross Margin		7268	%		7365	%		7667	%		7269	%		7367	%

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments on an ongoing basis. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The fiscal year-end dates referenced herein for ~~2016~~2017, ~~2015~~2016, and ~~2014~~2015, are December 31, ~~2016~~2017, December 31, ~~2015~~2016, and December 31, ~~2014~~2015, respectively.

1415

We believe the following critical accounting policies affect the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

Subscription Revenue

Subscription revenue is based on a number of factors, such as the number of users to whom we provide one or more of ~~its~~our Behavioral Analytics offerings, the type and number of Behavioral Analytics offerings deployed to the client, and in some cases, the number of hours of calls analyzed during the relevant month of the subscription period. Subscription periods generally range from one to three years after the go-live date or, in cases where we contract with a client for a short-term pilot of a Behavioral Analytics offering prior to committing to a longer subscription period, if any, the subscription or pilot periods generally range from three to twelve months after the go-live date. This revenue is recognized over the applicable subscription period as the service is performed for the client.

Other Revenue

Other revenue consists of deployment revenue, professional services revenue, and reimbursed expenses revenue.

Unearned Revenue

Unearned revenue consists of billings or payments received in advance of revenue recognition for Behavioral Analytics contracts. Unearned revenue is recognized as revenue when the applicable recognition criteria are met.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from clients not paying for unpaid or disputed invoices for contractual services provided. Additional allowances may be required if the financial condition of our clients deteriorates.

Stock Warrants

In accordance with ASC 480-10, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, we classified certain warrants to purchase Common Stock that do not meet the requirements for classification as equity, as liabilities. Such liabilities are initially recorded at fair value with subsequent changes in fair value recorded as a component of gain or loss on warrant liability on the consolidated statements of operations in each reporting period. See Note ~~Seventeen~~Eighteen — Fair Value Measurements of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

1516

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the vesting period. Determining fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date requires certain assumptions. We use historical information as the basis for the selection of expected life, expected volatility, and expected dividend yield assumptions~~, and anticipated forfeiture rates~~. The risk-free interest rate is selected based on the yields from U.S. Treasury Strips with a remaining term equal to the expected term of the options being valued.

Goodwill

Goodwill is tested annually for impairment or more frequently if an event or circumstance indicates that an impairment loss may have been incurred. In performing our annual impairment test, we first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, including goodwill. If it is concluded that this is the case for the reporting unit, we perform a detailed quantitative assessment ~~using a two-step test approach~~. First In the ~~first step, the~~ fair value of the reporting unit is compared with its carrying value. If the fair value exceeds the carrying value, then goodwill is not impaired and no further testing is performed. ~~The~~If ~~second step is performed if~~ the carrying value exceeds the fair value., ~~The~~then ~~implied~~an ~~fair~~impairment ~~value~~loss ofequal ~~the~~to ~~reporting unit’s goodwill must be determined and compared with~~ the ~~carrying~~difference ~~value~~between of the ~~goodwill. If the~~ carrying ~~value~~and ~~of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied~~ fair value, ~~then an impairment loss equal to the difference~~ will be recorded. We currently operate in a single business segment or reporting unit.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets reflect costs related to patent and trademark applications, marketing managed services customer relationships, and the purchase of certain intellectual property rights. The costs related to patent and trademark applications and the purchase of certain intellectual property are amortized over 120 months. The other intangible assets are fully amortized.

Income Taxes

We have recorded income tax valuation allowances on our net deferred tax assets to account for the unpredictability surrounding the timing of realization of our U.S. and non-U.S. net deferred tax assets due to continuing operating losses. The valuation allowances may be reversed at a point in time when management determines realization of these tax assets has become more likely than not, based on a return to or achieving predictable levels of profitability.

We use an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting of income taxes. Deferred income taxes are provided when tax laws and financial accounting standards differ with respect to the amount of income for the year, the basis of assets and liabilities and for tax loss carryforwards.

We may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Significant judgment is used to determine the likelihood of the benefit.

Other Significant Accounting Policies

For a description of our other significant accounting policies, see Note Two—Summary of Significant Accounting Policies of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Business Outlook

Based on research from third-party analysts, we believe the call center industry is ripe for disruption and innovation. We believe what the call center was designed to accomplish and how it was measured are parts of an outdated mode of business that is disconnected from the needs of today’s consumer. In fact, research from the Corporate Executive Board suggests that any call center interaction is four times more likely to drive customer disloyalty than increased loyalty. Given a rise in self-service, these interactions are only becoming more complex and fraught with greater risk.

Through our product offerings, we seek to provide our clients with personality-based software applications that mitigate the complexity and reduce the risk of these call center interactions. According to Gartner, Inc., there were six million call center seats in North America in 2015, and less than 1% of this market is penetrated by personality-based software applications. We believe that we are uniquely positioned to capitalize on this opportunity. Our strategy to increase revenue and capture market share includes the following elements:

•

Drive new bookings growth and increase operating leverage;

•

Leverage a “land and expand” model, focused on personality-based routing as the catalyst for new client acquisition;

•

Cross-sell coaching, quality assurance, and analytic products after delivering a routing solution;

•

Continue to invest in innovative linguistic models and behavioral science;

•

Expand our sales and marketing capacity; and

•

Test the applicability of our proprietary personality-based software applications with clients outside of the call center industry.

Our personality-based software applications, which have been developed through substantial investment over the past decade, are deeply embedded into our clients’ infrastructure and workflows. Our long-term client relationships are made up largely of multi-year contracts with high contract renewal rates. Our aspiration is that our “land and expand” model, focused on our routing product, will continue to accelerate the acquisition of new clients.

Results of Operations

	Year Ended December 31,							Year Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions)	~~2016~~2017		~~2015~~2016		Change			~~2015~~2016		~~2014~~2015		Change
Total revenue	$	4246.15	$	3942.91		(610	)%	$	3942.91	$	3039.39		326	%
Total cost of revenue, exclusive of depreciation and amortization		13.86		1013.78		29(2	)%	1013.78		910.47			1429	%
Gross margin		2833.30		2928.23		(316	)%	2928.23		2029.92			40(3	)%
Other operating expenses		4745.12		4447.31		6(4	)%	4447.31		3344.93			316	%
Operating loss		1812.82		1518.18		25(35	)%	1518.18			1315.01		1625	%
Non-operating expenses		24.12		02.61		~~260~~98	%	02.61		10.26			~~(52~~260	)%
Net loss		2116.03		1521.70		34(22	)%	~~15.7~~	21.0	1415.27			1034	%

Revenue

2017 Compared with 2016

Total revenue increased by $4.4 million, or 10%, when compared with 2016. The increase consisted of a $5.0 million increase in subscription revenue offset by a $0.6 million decrease in other revenue. Subscription revenue increased primarily due to $5.5 million from growth within existing client contracts and $1.0 million from new client contracts, partially offset by a decrease of $1.5 million from terminating contracts. Other revenue decreased primarily due to reduced recognition of deployment fees. Deployment fees are deferred and recognized over the contract’s subscription period beginning on the go-live date. If a contract terminates early, remaining deferred deployment revenue is recognized upon termination.

Highest Revenue Generating Clients:

	(Percentage of Total Revenue)
	2017			2016
Top 5 Clients		71	%		73	%
Top 10 Clients		86	%		87	%

Clients Accounting for 10% or More of Total Revenue:

	(Percentage of Total Revenue)
	2017			2016
United HealthCare Services, Inc.		28	%		33	%
CVS Caremark Corporation		16	%		15	%
TriWest Healthcare Alliance Corp		14	%		9	%
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company		8	%		11	%

A substantial portion of our revenue comes from a limited number of clients. Higher concentration of revenue with a single client or a limited group of clients creates increased revenue risk if one of these clients significantly reduces its demand for our services. United HealthCare Services, Inc., our largest customer in 2017, has expressed an intent to use less of our services in 2018, which could have a material impact on revenue.

2016 Compared with 2015

Total revenue increased by $2.2 million, or 6%, when compared with 2015. The increase consisted of a $2.6 million increase in subscription revenue offset by a $0.4 million decrease in other revenue. Subscription revenue increased primarily due to $6.0 million from new client contracts, partially offset by a decrease of $3.4 million from terminating contracts. Other revenue decreased primarily due to reduced recognition of deployment fees. Deployment fees are deferred and recognized over the contract’s subscription period beginning on the go-live date. If a contract terminates early, remaining deferred deployment revenue is recognized upon termination.

17Highest Revenue Generating Clients:

Our top five clients accounted for 73% of total revenue in 2016 and 73% of total revenue in 2015. Our top ten clients accounted for 87% of total revenue in 2016 and 89% of total revenue in 2015. In 2016 and 2015, three clients each accounted for 10% or more of total revenue. In 2016, United HealthCare Services, Inc., CVS Caremark Corporation, and Progressive Casualty Insurance Company accounted for 33%, 15%, and 11% of total revenue, respectively. In 2015, United HealthCare Services, Inc., Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, and CVS Caremark Corporation accounted for 31%, 15%, and 13% of total revenue, respectively. Higher concentration of revenue with a single client or a limited group of clients creates increased revenue risk if one of these clients significantly reduces its demand for our services.

	(Percentage of Total Revenue)
	2016			2015
Top 5 Clients		73	%		73	%
Top 10 Clients		87	%		89	%

~~2015~~Clients ~~Compared~~Accounting ~~with~~for ~~2014~~10% or More of Total Revenue:

Total revenue increased by $9.6 million in 2015 when compared with 2014. The increase consisted of a $9.7 million increase in subscription revenue offset by a $0.1 million decrease in other revenue. The increase in subscription revenue in 2015 was primarily due to the increased subscription fees associated with the conversion of several Behavioral Analytics deployments to the subscription phase of the contract, as well as expansion of user counts in our existing client base. Other revenue decreased primarily due to reduced recognition of deployment fees.

	(Percentage of Total Revenue)
	2016			2015
United HealthCare Services, Inc.		33	%		31	%
CVS Caremark Corporation		15	%		13	%
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company		11	%		15	%

Our top five clients accounted for 73% of total revenue in 2015 and 75% of total revenue in 2014. The top ten clients accounted for 89% of total revenue in 2015 and 91% of total revenue in 2014. In 2015 and 2014, three clients each accounted for 10% or more of total revenue. In 2015, United HealthCare Services, Inc., Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, and CVS Caremark Corporation accounted for 31%, 15%, and 13% of total revenue, respectively. In 2014, United HealthCare Services, Inc., Progressive Casualty Insurance Company, and HealthCare Service Corporation accounted for 25%, 20%, and 11% of total revenue, respectively. Higher concentration of revenue with a single client or a limited group of clients creates increased revenue risk if one of these clients significantly reduces its demand for our services.

Total Cost of Revenue, Exclusive of Depreciation and Amortization

2017 Compared with 2016

Total costs of revenue consisted of $10.2 million of subscription revenue costs and $3.4 million of other revenue costs. Cost of subscription revenue was $10.2 million, or 23% of subscription revenue, in 2017, when compared with $10.4 million, or 27% of subscription revenue, in 2016. The $0.2 million decrease in cost was primarily due to a decrease in maintenance costs, partially offset by incremental personnel costs.

2016 Compared with 2015

Total costs of revenue consisted of $10.4 million of subscription revenue costs and $3.4 million of other revenue costs. Cost of subscription revenue was $10.4 million, or 27% of subscription revenue, in 2016, when compared with $8.1 million, or 22% of subscription revenue, in 2015. The $2.3 million increase in cost was primarily due to incremental personnel costs.

~~2015 Compared with 2014~~19

Total costs of revenue consisted of $8.1 million of subscription revenue costs and $2.6 million of other revenue costs. Cost of subscription revenue was $8.1 million, or 22% of subscription revenue, in 2015, when compared with $6.8 million, or 26% of subscription revenue, in 2014. The $1.3 million increase in cost was primarily due to increased revenue and incremental personnel costs. The favorable decrease in percentage was primarily due to better leverage of our cost structure supporting our subscription clients.

Other Operating Expenses

2017 Compared with 2016

Other operating expenses include product development, sales and marketing, general and administrative, and depreciation and amortization. Other operating expenses decreased in 2017 when compared with 2016 primarily as a result of a $3.5 million decrease in sales and marketing expenses, partially offset by a $0.8 million increase in product development expenses and a $0.4 million increase in depreciation and amortization.

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, incentive compensation, commissions, and employee benefits for business development, account management, and marketing. Sales and marketing expenses decreased $3.5 million in 2017 when compared with 2016. The decrease was primarily due to one-time severance costs incurred in 2016, as well as decreased compensation costs related to a reduction in headcount.

Product development expenses increased $0.8 million in 2017 when compared with 2016 due to increased technology expenses, partially offset by decreased third-party product development costs.

Depreciation and amortization increased $0.4 million in 2017 when compared with 2016. The rise in expense resulted primarily from increased investments in technology, as well as the build out of our new Austin office in the first half of 2017.

2016 Compared with 2015

Other operating expenses include ~~research~~product ~~and~~ development, sales and marketing, general and administrative, and depreciation and amortization. Other operating expenses increased in 2016 when compared with 2015 primarily as a result of a $3.1 million increase in sales and marketing expenses, and a $1.0 million increase in depreciation and amortization, partially offset by a $1.4 million decrease in ~~research~~product ~~and~~ development expenses.

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, incentive compensation, commissions, and employee benefits for business development, account management, and marketing. Sales and marketing expenses increased $3.1 million in 2016 when compared with 2015. The increase was primarily due to one-time severance ~~benefits~~costs, as well as increased compensation costs related to the expansion of our sales and marketing teams.

Depreciation and amortization increased $1.0 million in 2016 when compared with 2015. The rise in expense resulted primarily from increased investments in technology, as well as the build out of our new Chicago office in late 2015.

~~Research~~Product ~~and~~ development expenses decreased $1.4 million in 2016 when compared with 2015, primarily due to decreased compensation costs.

2015 Compared with 2014

Other operating expenses increased in 2015 when compared with 2014 primarily as a result of a $4.7 million increase in sales and marketing expenses, $2.6 million increase in general and administrative expenses, a $1.4 million increase in depreciation and amortization, and a $1.3 million increase in research and development expenses.

Sales and marketing expenses increased $4.7 million in 2015 when compared with 2014. The increase was primarily due to increased compensation costs related to the expansion of our sales and marketing teams.

General and administrative expenses increased $2.6 million in 2015 when compared with 2014. The increase was primarily due to higher compensation, and recruiting and legal expenses.

Depreciation and amortization increased $1.4 million in 2015 when compared with 2014. The increase was primarily due to higher capital expenditures and losses on fixed asset disposals in 2015. Amortization of intangibles increased $0.4 million due to the purchase of certain intellectual property rights.

Research and development expenses increased $1.3 million in 2015 when compared with 2014. The increase was primarily due to higher compensation and outside services costs.

Non-Operating Expenses

2017 Compared with 2016

Non-operating expenses consist primarily of interest and other borrowing costs, loss on early extinguishment of debt, changes in the fair value of the warrant liability and other non-operating income. Non-operating expenses increased by $2.1 million in 2017 when compared with 2016.

Interest and other borrowing costs increased by $0.5 million in 2017 when compared with 2016. The increase is a result of interest on Hercules debt that was outstanding for the first half of 2017 and interest on the CIBC Bank USA f/k/a The PrivateBank and Trust Company (CIBC) line of credit draws outstanding for the remainder of the year.

The loss on the early extinguishment of Hercules debt totaled $1.8 million at June 29, 2017. It consisted of a prepayment charge of $0.7 million, acceleration of unaccreted debt discount of $0.6 million, and acceleration of unamortized deferred debt costs of $0.5 million.

Concurrent with issuance of the Hercules debt, the company issued a warrant that gives Hercules the right to purchase 357,142 shares of common stock at $3.50 per share. The warrant expires August 1, 2023. The warrant is accounted for as a liability and carried at fair market value using the Black-Scholes model. The change in fair value of the warrant liability increased $0.2 million in 2017 when compared with 2016 due to fluctuations in our stock price.

2016 Compared with 2015

Non-operating expenses consist primarily of interest and other borrowing costs, changes in the fair value of the warrant liability and other non-operating income.

Interest and other borrowing costs increased $1.7 million in 2016 when compared with 2015, primarily as a result of a new term loan with Hercules, which originated on August 1, 2016.

2015 Compared with 2014

Interest and other expense decreased $0.5 million in 2015 when compared with 2014, primarily due to $0.5 million write-off of deferred financing fees in connection with the termination of our Principal Financial Group Inc. credit facility in 2014.

Income Tax Provision

Net deferred tax assets consist primarily of U.S. and non-U.S. net operating losses. Due to uncertainty in predicting when we will achieve the profitability required to utilize our operating losses, we have recognized a valuation allowance for the full amount of our net deferred tax assets.

2017 Compared with 2016

The income tax benefit was $0.1 million in 2017 and the income tax provision was $0.1 million in 2016. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, total net deferred tax assets of approximately $58.1 million and $83.8 million, respectively, were fully offset by a valuation allowance.

2016 Compared with 2015

The income tax provision was $0.1 million and less than $0.1 million in 2016 and 2015, respectively. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, total net deferred tax assets of approximately $83.8 million and $75.8 million, respectively, were fully offset by a valuation allowance.

2015 Compared with 2014

The income tax provision was less than $0.1 million in 2015 and 2014. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, total net deferred tax assets of $75.8 million and $71.0 million, respectively, were fully offset by a valuation allowance.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources and Uses of Cash

Our principal capital requirements are to fund working capital needs, capital expenditures for Behavioral Analytics and infrastructure requirements, and other revenue generation and growth investments. Our principal capital resources consisted of cash and cash equivalents of $129.50 million and $1512.45 million at December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015~~2016, respectively.

19Net cash used in operating activities decreased by $8.0 million in 2017 when compared with 2016. The $4.7 million decrease in net loss, largely attributable to growth in customer base and a decrease in operating expenses in 2017, contributed to this decrease in net cash used in operating activities. Cash provided by collections on accounts receivable improved by $5.8 million and from unearned revenue increased by $0.5 million when compared with 2016. Cash used in investing activities decreased by $0.8 million in 2017 when compared with 2016 due to fewer fixed asset purchases. Net cash provided by financing activities decreased by $15.2 million in 2017 when compared with 2016, primarily as a result of $23.8 million of cash used to repay in full the principal balance and accrued and unpaid interest outstanding under the term loan with Hercules, partially offset by net $16.9 million of proceeds drawn on our credit line with CIBC (see Credit Facility below) and $14.8 million, net of fees received from the sale of 5,328,187 shares of common stock pursuant to a private placement of common stock.

~~Net~~Historically, we have not paid cash ~~used~~dividends inon ~~operating~~our ~~activities~~common ~~increased~~stock, byand ~~$11.4~~we ~~million~~do innot ~~2016~~expect ~~when~~to ~~compared~~do ~~with~~so ~~2015~~in the future. ~~The~~Our ~~increase~~Series inB ~~net~~stock ~~cash~~accrues ~~used~~dividends inat ~~operating~~a ~~activities~~rate ~~was~~of ~~largely~~7% per ~~attributable~~year, topayable ~~increases~~semi-annually in ~~cost~~January and July if declared by our board of ~~revenue~~directors. If not declared, ~~and~~unpaid ~~sales~~dividends are cumulative and ~~marketing~~accrue ~~expenses,~~at asthe ~~well~~rate asof a7% per $4year.2 ~~million~~Our ~~increase~~board inof ~~restricted~~directors ~~cash~~has ~~used~~not todeclared ~~collateralize~~a ~~letters~~dividend ofpayment ~~credit~~on ~~for~~the ~~equipment~~Series ~~leasing.~~B ~~Cash~~stock, ~~used~~which inhas ~~investing~~been ~~activities~~accrued, ~~decreased~~from ~~by $~~July 1.0, ~~million~~2012 inthrough ~~2016~~December 31, ~~when~~2017 ~~compared~~(the ~~with~~aggregate ~~2015~~amount ~~primarily~~of ~~due~~these todividends awas ~~decrease~~approximately in$3.2 ~~capital expenditures~~million). ~~During~~Payment ~~2015,~~of ~~capital~~future ~~expenditures~~dividends ~~included~~on athe ~~one-time~~Series ~~investment~~B instock ~~relocating~~will ~~our~~be ~~corporate~~determined ~~headquarters.~~by ~~Net~~the ~~cash~~board ~~provided~~of bydirectors ~~financing~~based ~~activities~~on ~~increased~~our bybusiness ~~$6.3~~outlook ~~million,~~and ~~primarily~~macroeconomic asconditions aand ~~result~~may ofnot exceed $220.5 2 million in ~~debt~~the ~~proceeds~~aggregate ~~from~~in ~~Hercules~~any ~~(see~~calendar ~~Credit~~year, ~~Facility~~as ~~below).~~per Inour ~~2015~~loan weagreement ~~received~~with ~~$15~~CIBC.9 ~~million~~The inamount ~~proceeds~~of ~~from~~each ~~the~~dividend ~~sale~~accrual ofwill ~~2,728,712~~be ~~shares~~decreased by any conversions of the Series B stock into common stock, ~~pursuant~~as such conversions require us to ~~the~~pay ~~Common~~accrued ~~Stock~~but ~~Purchase~~unpaid ~~Agreement~~dividends ~~executed~~at onthe ~~July~~time of conversion. Conversions of Series ~~22, 2015~~B stock are at the option of the holder.

Historically, we have not paid cash dividends on our common stock, and we do not expect to do so in the future. Our Series B stock accrues dividends at a rate of 7% per year, payable semi-annually in January and July if declared by our board of directors. If not declared, unpaid dividends are cumulative and accrue at the rate of 7% per year. The board of directors has not declared a dividend payment on the Series B stock, which has been accrued, from July 1, 2012 through December 31, 2016 (the aggregate amount of these dividends was approximately $2.6 million). Payment of future dividends on the Series B stock will be determined by the board of directors based on our business outlook and macroeconomic conditions and is subject to approval by Hercules under the terms of our new secured loan agreement. The amount of each dividend accrual will be decreased by any conversions of the Series B stock into common stock, as such conversions require us to pay accrued but unpaid dividends at the time of conversion. Conversions of Series B stock are at the option of the holder.

Liquidity

As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, our near-term capital resources consisted of our current cash balance, together with anticipated future cash flows, financing from capital leases, and borrowing capacity (see Credit Facility below). Our balance of cash and cash equivalents was $129.50 million as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017. Restricted cash of $4.2.7 million was used as collateral for letters of credit issued to support our equipment leasing activities. On March 1, 2017, we completed an offering of 5,328,187 shares of our unregistered common stock for gross proceeds of $16.0 million (or approximately $14.9 million after commissions, but before other expenses).

We anticipate that our current unrestricted cash resources, together with operating revenue, capital lease financing, and borrowing capacity, should be sufficient to satisfy our short-term working capital and capital expenditure needs for the next twelve months. Management will continue to assess opportunities to maximize cash resources by actively managing our cost structure and closely monitoring the collection of our accounts receivable. If, however, our operating activities, capital expenditure requirements, or net cash needs differ materially from current expectations due to uncertainties surrounding the current capital market, credit and general economic conditions, competition, or the termination of a large client contract, then there is no assurance that we would have access to additional external capital resources on acceptable terms.

Credit Facility

On ~~August~~June 129, ~~2016~~2017, we entered into athe ~~secured~~ loan agreement with ~~Hercules under which we may borrow up to $30~~CIBC.0 ~~million~~The inloan ~~three~~agreement ~~tranches. On~~provides ~~August~~for 1,a ~~2016,~~revolving weline ~~borrowed the first tranche~~ of ~~$22.5~~credit ~~million~~to ~~and~~us ~~paid~~with a ~~facility~~maximum ~~charge~~credit oflimit ~~$250,000. The second tranche~~ of ~~up to~~ $220.50 million ~~is available beginning July 1~~, ~~2017~~which ~~and~~matures ~~continuing~~on ~~until~~June ~~September 15~~29, ~~2017,~~2020 ~~provided that specified conditions are satisfied, including that we have achieved at least 85% of projected bookings and revenues for~~ (the ~~six~~credit ~~month period ending June 30, 2017~~facility). The ~~third~~credit ~~tranche~~facility ~~of up to $5.0 million~~ is ~~available~~secured ~~beginning~~by ona ~~September 15,~~security ~~2017~~interest ~~and~~in ~~continuing until September 15, 2018, provided that specified conditions are satisfied, including that we have achieved (i) at least 85% of projected bookings and revenues for~~ the ~~six~~company’s ~~month~~assets. ~~period ending June 30~~We, ~~2017~~subject ~~and~~to ~~(ii)~~certain ~~additional~~limits ~~performance milestones that Hercules~~ and ~~we mutually agreed upon. There is $50~~restrictions,~~000~~ ~~facility~~may ~~charge~~from wetime ~~must~~to ~~pay~~time ifrequest wethe ~~borrow~~issuance ~~the~~of ~~third~~letters ~~tranche. Our~~of ~~obligations~~credit under the ~~secured~~ loan agreement ~~are secured by a security interest in substantially all of our assets, including our intellectual property~~.

The ~~per~~principal ~~annum~~amount ~~interest rate for any~~ outstanding ~~loans~~ under the ~~Hercules~~credit ~~secured~~facility ~~loan~~will ~~agreement~~accrue isinterest ~~the~~at ~~greater~~a offloating ~~(i)~~annual ~~9.75%~~rate ~~plus~~equal ~~the~~to ~~prime~~1 ~~rate~~month, as2 ~~reported~~month inor ~~The~~3 ~~Wall~~month ~~Street~~LIBOR ~~Journal~~(as ~~minus~~selected ~~3.50%,~~by ~~and (ii~~us) 9plus 4.7550%, ~~computed~~payable ~~on a daily basis~~monthly. In addition, towe ~~the~~will ~~interest~~pay ~~accrued~~a ~~pursuant~~non-use tofee ~~the~~on ~~foregoing interest rate,~~ the ~~principal~~credit ~~balance~~facility of ~~any~~25 ~~outstanding~~basis ~~loans~~points ~~under the secured loan agreement will bear payment-in-kind interest at a rate of 2~~(0.1525%) per annum, ~~computed~~of onthe aaverage ~~daily~~unused ~~basis,~~portion ~~and~~of ~~such amount will be added to~~ the ~~outstanding~~credit ~~principal~~facility. The ~~balance~~amount ~~outstanding~~we onmay ~~the~~borrow ~~loans. Monthly payments~~ under the ~~secured~~credit ~~loan~~facility ~~agreement~~is ~~are~~limited ~~interest only until December 1, 2017 (which may be extended~~ to ~~March 1,~~five ~~2018~~times ifour ~~specified~~monthly ~~conditions~~recurring ~~are~~revenue ~~met,~~(as ~~including~~determined ~~that~~in weaccordance ~~have~~with ~~achieved at least 80% of projected revenue for~~ the ~~quarter~~terms ~~ending September 30, 2017,~~ and ~~to June 1, 2018 if specified~~ conditions ~~are~~set ~~met,~~forth ~~including~~in ~~that we have achieved at least 80% of projected revenue for~~ the ~~quarter~~loan ~~ending December 31~~agreement), ~~2017)~~multiplied ~~followed~~ by 30a ~~equal~~dynamic ~~monthly~~churn ~~payments~~factor ~~of principal and interest; provided~~ that ~~any~~is ~~outstanding~~based ~~principal~~upon ~~and~~the ~~all~~ratio ~~accrued but unpaid interest will be due and payable on February 1, 2020. We may elect to prepay prior to maturity all, but not less than all,~~ of ~~the~~recurring ~~outstanding~~revenue ~~amounts~~retained ~~under~~in the ~~secured~~prior ~~loan~~twelve ~~agreement,~~month ~~including~~period ~~interest. If~~relative ~~we elect~~ to ~~prepay~~ the ~~outstanding~~total ~~amounts~~amount ~~under~~of ~~the~~recurring ~~secured~~revenue ~~loan~~at ~~agreement~~the ~~prior~~beginning ~~to maturity, a prepayment charge~~ of ~~3.0%,~~the 2period.~~0%,~~ ~~or 1.0% of the then outstanding principal balance (including any accrued payment-in-~~

20The loan agreement imposes various restrictions on us, including usual and customary limitations on our ability to incur debt and to grant liens upon our assets, increasing restrictions based on thresholds, prohibits certain consolidations, mergers, and sales and transfers of assets by us and requires us to comply with a trailing twelve months of total revenue and quarterly EBITDA (as adjusted in accordance with the loan agreement) targets. The loan agreement includes usual and customary events of default (with customary grace periods, as applicable) and provides that, upon the occurrence of an event of default, payment of all amounts payable under the loan agreement may be accelerated and/or the lender’s commitments may be terminated. In addition, upon the occurrence of certain insolvency or bankruptcy related events of default, all amounts payable under the loan agreement will automatically become immediately due and payable, and the lender’s commitments will automatically terminate.

~~kind~~Prior ~~interest~~to ~~added~~entering asinto ~~principal)~~the ~~also~~loan ~~will~~agreement bewith ~~due~~CIBC, ~~depending~~we ~~upon~~were ~~whether~~party weto ~~prepay~~a inloan ~~year~~agreement ~~one,~~with inHercules. ~~year~~On ~~two~~June 29, or2017, ~~after~~we ~~year~~drew ~~two~~$13.5 ofmillion on the ~~closing~~credit ~~date~~facility to repay the principal balance of $22.5 million, ~~respectively~~$0. In7 ~~addition~~million of prepayment charges, weand ~~will~~$0.6 million beof ~~required~~accrued toand ~~prepay~~unpaid ~~all~~interest ~~such~~under ~~outstanding~~our ~~amounts~~prior ~~and~~credit ~~such~~facility ~~prepayment~~with ~~charge~~Hercules. ~~upon~~Upon effectiveness of the ~~occurrence~~loan agreement and repayment of athe ~~change~~Hercules incredit ~~control~~facility, we terminated our loan agreement with Hercules.

~~Prior~~See toNote ~~entering~~Eleven—Debt ~~into~~of the ~~secured~~Notes ~~loan agreement with Hercules Capital, Inc., we were party~~ to aConsolidated ~~credit~~Financial ~~facility~~Statements ~~and~~included ~~term~~in ~~loan~~Part ~~with~~II ~~Silicon~~Item 8 ~~Valley~~of ~~Bank.~~this ~~The~~Annual ~~credit~~Report ~~facility and term loan were terminated~~ on ~~August~~Form ~~1, 2016. We used a portion of the proceeds from the initial borrowings under the Hercules Capital, Inc. secured loan agreement to repay our term loan with Silicon Valley Bank and to pay borrowing~~10-~~related fees and expenses~~K. ~~We expect to use the remaining proceeds and any future borrowings under the Hercules secured loan agreement with Hercules for general corporate purposes.~~

See Note Twelve—Debt of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Accounts Receivable Customer Concentration

As of December 31, ~~2016~~2017, ~~two~~three clients, United HealthCare Services, Inc., ~~and~~ CVS Caremark Corporation, and Progressive Casualty Insurance Company accounted for 4129%, 13% and 2713% of total gross accounts receivable, respectively. Of these amounts, we have collected 81100% from United HealthCare Services, Inc., ~~and 52~~100% from CVS Pharmacy, Inc., and 100% from Progressive Casualty Insurance Company through March 67, ~~2017~~2018. Of the total December 31, ~~2016~~2017 gross accounts receivable, we have collected 5687% as of March 67, ~~2017~~2018. Because we have a high percentage of our revenue dependent on a relatively small number of clients, delayed payments by a few of our larger clients could result in a reduction of our available cash.

Capital Lease Obligations

We are a party to capital lease agreements with leasing companies to fund our ongoing equipment requirements. Capital lease obligations were $3.62 million as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and $3.46 million as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016. We expect to incur new capital lease obligations of ~~between~~approximately $21.69 million ~~to $3.1 million~~ for ~~2017~~2018 as we continue to expand our investment in the infrastructure for Behavioral Analytics.

Contractual Obligations

Cash will be required for operating leases and non-cancellable purchase obligations, as well as various commitments reflected as liabilities on our balance sheet as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017. These commitments are as follows:

(In millions) Contractual Obligations	Total		Less Than 1 Year		1 – 3 Years		3 – 5 Years		More Than 5 Years
Long-term debt	$	29.7	$	3.1	$	20.6	$	6.0	$	—
Revolving line of credit	$	16.9	$	—	$	16.9	$	—	$	—
Operating leases		3.9		1.1		1.3		1.0		0.5
Debt		0.3		0.1		0.2		—		—
Capital leases		3.9		2.0		1.9		—		—
Operating leases		4.2		0.9		2.0		0.8		0.5
Purchase obligations		4.7		3.9		0.8		—		—
Capital leases		3.5		2.2		1.3		—		—
Total	$	42.2	$	10.1	$	24.6	$	7.0	$	0.5
Purchase obligations		4.9		3.6		1.3		—		—
Total	$	29.8	$	6.8	$	21.7	$	0.8	$	0.5

Leases

The amounts set forth in the chart above reflect future principal, interest, and executory costs of the leases entered into by us for technology and office equipment, as well as office and data center space. Liabilities for the principal portion of the capital lease obligations are reflected on our balance sheet as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015~~2016.

Purchase Obligations

Purchase obligations ~~include~~under ~~$4.7~~long-term ~~million~~non-cancellable of commitments ~~reflected~~are asrecorded ~~liabilities~~at onnet ~~our~~present ~~balance~~value ~~sheet~~in ~~as of December 31, 2016, Purchase obligations include $3.8 million of commitments reflected as liabilities on~~ our balance sheet ~~as of December 31, 2015, as well as $0~~.~~9 million of non-cancellable obligations to purchase goods or services in the future.~~

Letters of Credit

There were $43.24 million of standby letters of credit issued as collateral for capital and operating leases as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017. Certain letters of credit are secured by $2.7 million of restricted cash.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

During ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated financial partnerships, such as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Historically, we have not experienced material fluctuations in our results of operations due to foreign currency exchange rate changes. We do not currently engage, nor is there any plan to engage, in hedging foreign currency risk.

We also have interest rate risk with respect to changes in variable interest rates on our ~~term~~revolving ~~loan~~line of credit and other borrowings, capital leases, and cash and cash equivalents. Interest on the ~~secured~~line ~~loan~~of ~~agreement~~credit with ~~Hercules~~CIBC is currently based on ~~either~~a ~~the~~1 month, ~~greater~~2 month ofor ~~(i) 9.75% plus the prime rate minus~~ 3~~.50%,~~ month ~~the~~LIBOR ~~prime~~ rate ~~varies~~(as inselected ~~accordance~~by ~~with~~the ~~prevailing market conditions or (ii~~company) 9plus 4.7550%,. A change in interest rate impacts the interest and other borrowing costs and cash flows.

2223

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

		Page
Financial Statements:
Report of Grant Thornton LLP Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		2425
Consolidated Balance Sheets — December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015		26
Consolidated Balance Sheets — December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016		27
Consolidated Statements of Operations — for the years ended 2016, 2015, and 2014		27
Consolidated Statements of Operations — for the years ended 2017, 2016 and 2015		28
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss — for the years ended 2016, 2015, and 2014		28
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss — for the years ended 2017, 2016 and 2015		29
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — for the years ended 2016, 2015, and 2014		29
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows — for the years ended 2017, 2016 and 2015		30
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity — December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014		30
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity — December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015		31
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		3132
Financial Statement Schedule:
Schedule II-Valuation and Qualifying Accounts — December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015, and December 31,2014		51
Schedule II-Valuation and Qualifying Accounts — December 31, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December 31,2015		52

2324

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Mattersight Corporation

WeOpinion ~~have~~on ~~audited~~ the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Mattersight Corporation (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. Our audits of the basic consolidated financial statements included the financial statement schedule listed in the index appearing under Schedule II – Valuation of Qualifying Accounts. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We ~~conducted~~have ~~our~~audited ~~audits~~the inaccompanying ~~accordance~~consolidated ~~with~~balance ~~the~~sheets ~~standards~~ of ~~the~~Mattersight ~~Public~~Corporation ~~Company~~(a ~~Accounting~~Delaware ~~Oversight~~corporation) ~~Board~~and subsidiaries (~~United~~the ~~States~~“Company”). ~~Those~~as ~~standards~~of ~~require~~December ~~that~~31, we2017 ~~plan~~ and ~~perform~~2016, the ~~audit~~related toconsolidated ~~obtain~~statements ~~reasonable~~of ~~assurance~~operations, ~~about~~comprehensive ~~whether~~loss, ~~the~~changes ~~financial~~in ~~statements~~shareholders’ ~~are~~equity, ~~free~~and cash flows for each of ~~material~~the ~~misstatement.~~three Anyears ~~audit~~in ~~includes~~the ~~examining,~~period onended aDecember ~~test~~31, ~~basis~~2017, ~~evidence~~and ~~supporting~~ the ~~amounts~~related notes and ~~disclosures~~schedule in(collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). AnIn ~~audit~~our ~~also~~opinion, ~~includes~~the ~~assessing~~financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the ~~accounting~~financial ~~principles~~position ~~used~~of ~~and~~the ~~significant~~Company ~~estimates~~as ~~made~~of byDecember ~~management~~31, as2017 ~~well~~and as2016, ~~evaluating~~and the ~~overall~~results ~~financial~~of ~~statement~~its ~~presentation.~~operations Weand ~~believe~~its ~~that~~cash ~~our~~flows ~~audits~~for ~~provide~~each aof ~~reasonable~~the ~~basis~~three ~~for~~years ~~our~~in ~~opinion~~the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

InWe ~~our~~also ~~opinion,~~have ~~the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly~~audited, in ~~all~~accordance ~~material~~with ~~respects,~~ the ~~financial~~standards ~~position~~ of ~~Mattersight~~the ~~Corporation~~Public ~~and~~Company ~~subsidiaries~~Accounting asOversight ofBoard ~~December 31,~~(United ~~2016~~States) ~~and 2015~~(“PCAOB”), ~~and~~ the ~~results~~Company’s ofinternal ~~their~~control ~~operations~~over ~~and~~financial ~~their~~reporting ~~cash~~as ~~flows for each~~ of ~~the three years in the period ended~~ December 31, ~~2016~~2017, inbased ~~conformity~~on ~~with~~criteria ~~accounting~~established ~~principles generally accepted~~ in the ~~United~~2013 ~~States~~Internal ofControl—Integrated ~~America.~~Framework ~~Also~~issued inby ~~our opinion,~~ the ~~related~~Committee ~~financial~~of ~~statement~~Sponsoring ~~schedule,~~Organizations ~~when~~of ~~considered in relation to~~ the ~~basic~~Treadway ~~consolidated~~Commission ~~financial statements taken as a whole~~(“COSO”), ~~present~~and ~~fairly,~~our inreport ~~all~~dated ~~material~~March ~~respects~~12, ~~the~~2018 ~~information~~expressed ~~set~~an ~~forth~~unqualified ~~therein~~opinion.

WeBasis ~~also~~for have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 16, 2017, expressed an unqualified opinion.

/These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s/ ~~GRANT~~management. ~~THORNTON~~Our ~~LLP~~responsibility ~~Chicago,~~is ~~Illinois~~to ~~March~~express ~~16,~~an ~~2017~~opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

24We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2006.

Chicago, Illinois

March 12, 2018

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders

Mattersight Corporation

WeOpinion ~~have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Mattersight Corporation (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2016, based~~ on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting in Item 9A. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We ~~conducted~~have ~~our~~audited ~~audit~~the ininternal ~~accordance~~control ~~with~~over ~~the~~financial ~~standards~~reporting of ~~the~~Mattersight ~~Public~~Corporation ~~Company Accounting Oversight Board~~ (~~United~~a ~~States~~Delaware corporation). ~~Those standards require that we plan~~ and ~~perform~~subsidiaries (the ~~audit~~“Company”) toas ~~obtain~~of ~~reasonable~~December ~~assurance~~31, ~~about~~2017, ~~whether~~based ~~effective~~on ~~internal~~criteria ~~control~~established ~~over financial reporting was maintained~~ in ~~all~~the ~~material~~2013 ~~respects.~~Internal ~~Our~~Control—Integrated ~~audit~~Framework ~~included~~issued ~~obtaining~~by anthe ~~understanding~~Committee of ~~internal~~Sponsoring ~~control~~Organizations ~~over~~of ~~financial reporting, assessing~~ the ~~risk~~Treadway ~~that~~Commission a(“COSO”). ~~material~~In ~~weakness~~our ~~exists~~opinion, ~~testing~~the ~~and~~Company ~~evaluating~~maintained, ~~the~~in ~~design~~all ~~and~~material ~~operating~~respects, ~~effectiveness~~effective of internal control ~~based~~over onfinancial ~~the~~reporting ~~assessed~~as ~~risk,~~of ~~and~~December ~~performing~~31, ~~such~~2017, ~~other~~based ~~procedures~~on ascriteria weestablished ~~considered necessary~~ in the ~~circumstances.~~2013 WeInternal ~~believe~~Control—Integrated ~~that~~Framework ~~our~~issued ~~audit~~by ~~provides a reasonable basis for our opinion~~COSO.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017, and our report dated March 12, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

Basis for opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management’s Annual Report of Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and limitations of internal control over financial reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In/s/ ~~our~~GRANT ~~opinion,~~THORNTON ~~the~~LLP ~~Company maintained~~Chicago, inIllinois ~~all~~March ~~material respects~~12, ~~effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in the 2013 Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO.~~2018

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements of the Company as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016, and our report dated March 16, 2017, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.26

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP Chicago, Illinois March 16, 2017

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

	December 31, 2016			December 31, 2015
	December 31, 2017			December 31, 2016
ASSETS:
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	129,~~538~~044		$	1512,~~407~~538
Receivables net of allowances of $311 and $24, respectively		8,508			4,863
Receivables net of allowances of $41 and $311, at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively		6,565			8,508
Prepaid expenses		45,~~440~~805			4,~~582~~440
Other current assets		~~296~~65			~~235~~296
Total current assets		2521,~~782~~479			25,~~087~~782
Equipment and leasehold improvements, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $19,748 and $14,805, respectively		9,576			8,523
Equipment and leasehold improvements, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $24,955 and $19,748, at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively		8,572			9,576
Goodwill		972			972
Intangibles assets, net of amortization of $3,820 and $3,351, respectively		3,201			3,353
Intangibles assets, net of amortization of $4,357 and $3,820, respectively		2,952			3,201
Other long-term assets (includes $4,210 in restricted cash at December 31, 2016)		6,033			2,467
Other long-term assets (includes $2,675 and $4,210 in restricted cash at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively)		5,960			6,033
Total assets	$	4539,~~564~~935		$	4045,~~402~~564
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Current Liabilities:
Short-term debt	$	~~738~~93		$	—738
Accounts payable		1,~~835~~474			1,~~223~~835
Accrued compensation and related costs		23,~~302~~312			2,~~761~~302
Unearned revenue		43,~~911~~032			64,~~378~~911
Capital leases		1,~~982~~967			1,~~819~~982
Other current liabilities		3,~~374~~399			13,~~796~~374
Total current liabilities		1513,~~142~~277			1315,~~977~~142
Long-term debt		2017,~~839~~056		—	20,839
Long-term unearned revenue		~~757~~914			~~1,597~~757
Long-term capital leases		1,~~602~~190			1,~~614~~602
Other long-term liabilities		56,~~945~~475			5,~~689~~945
Total liabilities		4438,~~285~~912			2244,~~877~~285
Series B convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized and designated; 1,637,948 and 1,644,768 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, with a liquidation preference of $10,985 and $10,443 at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively		8,354			8,388
Series B convertible preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 5,000,000 shares authorized and designated; 1,637,786 and 1,637,948 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, with a liquidation preference of $11,568 and $10,985 at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively		8,353			8,354
Stockholders’ Equity:
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 35,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding		—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 27,511,361 and 27,636,853 shares issued at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively; and 26,622,706 and 25,849,876 outstanding at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively		275			276
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 33,083,180 and 27,511,361 shares issued at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively; and 33,039,713 and 26,622,706 outstanding at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively		331			275
Additional paid-in capital		~~264~~275,~~214~~963			264,~~212~~214
Accumulated deficit		(~~263~~279,~~062~~425	)		(~~242~~263,~~085~~062	)
Treasury stock, at cost, 888,655 and 1,786,977 shares at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively		(4,455	)		(9,239	)
Treasury stock, at cost, 43,467 and 888,655 shares at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively		(117	)		(4,455	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(4,~~047~~082	)		(4,~~027~~047	)
Total stockholders’ (deficit) equity		(7,~~075~~330	)		9(7,~~137~~075	)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	4539,~~564~~935		$	4045,~~402~~564

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

2627

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except per share data)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
	2017			2016			2015
Revenue:
Subscription revenue	$	3843,~~720~~712		$	3638,~~091~~720		$	2636,~~372~~091
Other revenue		32,~~377~~798			3,~~821~~377			3,~~947~~821
Total revenue		4246,~~097~~510			3942,~~912~~097			3039,~~319~~912
Operating expenses:
Cost of subscription revenue		10,~~365~~159			810,~~072~~365			68,~~820~~072
Cost of other revenue		3,~~423~~394			23,~~604~~423			2,~~579~~604
Total cost of revenue, exclusive of depreciation and amortization		13,~~788~~553			1013,~~676~~788			910,~~399~~676
Research and development		12,502			13,891			12,545
Product development		13,295			12,502			13,891
Sales and marketing		1613,~~848~~389			1316,~~754~~848			913,~~102~~754
General and administrative		1112,~~827~~166			11,~~705~~827			911,~~140~~705
Depreciation and amortization		56,~~478~~347			45,~~450~~946			34,~~022~~942
Amortization of intangibles		468			492			106
Total operating expenses		58,750			60,911			54,968
Total operating expenses		60,911			54,968			43,314
Operating loss		(12,240	)		(18,814	)		(15,056	)
Operating loss		(18,814	)		(15,056	)		(12,995	)
Non-operating income (expense):
Interest and other borrowing costs		(2,~~319~~785	)		(~~600~~2,319	)		(~~1,092~~600	)
Change in fair value of warrant liability		167			3			(124	)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		(1,834	)	—			—
Other non-operating income		39			10			2
Change in fair value of warrant liability		377			167			3
Total non-operating income (expense)		(2,113	)		(587	)		(1,214	)
Other non-operating income		56			39			10
Loss before income taxes		(20,927	)		(15,643	)		(14,209	)
Total non-operating expense		(4,186	)		(2,113	)		(587	)
Income tax provision		(50	)		(38	)		(23	)
Loss before income taxes		(16,426	)		(20,927	)		(15,643	)
Net loss		(20,977	)		(15,681	)		(14,232	)
Income tax benefit (provision)		106			(50	)		(38	)
Dividends related to 7% Series B convertible preferred stock		(586	)		(588	)		(589	)
Net loss		(16,320	)		(20,977	)		(15,681	)
Net loss available to common stockholders	$	(21,563	)	$	(16,269	)	$	(14,821	)
Dividends related to 7% Series B convertible preferred stock		(584	)		(586	)		(588	)
Net loss available to common stockholders	$	(16,904	)	$	(21,563	)	$	(16,269	)
Per share of common stock:
Basic net loss available to common stock holders	$	(0.8656	)	$	(0.7086	)	$	(0.7470	)
Diluted net loss available to common stock holders	$	(0.8656	)	$	(0.7086	)	$	(0.7470	)
Shares used to calculate basic net loss per share		2530,~~209~~451			2325,~~264~~209			1923,~~923~~264
Shares used to calculate diluted net loss per share		2530,~~209~~451			2325,~~264~~209			1923,~~923~~264
Stock-based compensation expense is included in individual line items above:
Total cost of revenue	$	~~371~~353		$	~~255~~371		$	~~181~~255
Research and development		1,134			1,075			1,326
Product development		667			1,134			1,075
Sales and marketing		~~1,697~~348			1,~~330~~697			~~696~~1,330
General and administrative		21,~~122~~559			2,~~742~~122			12,~~975~~742

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

2728

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(In thousands)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
	2017			2016			2015
Net loss	$	(2016,~~977~~320	)	$	(1520,~~681~~977	)	$	(1415,~~232~~681	)
Other comprehensive loss:
Effect of currency translation		(2035	)		(120	)		7(1	)
Comprehensive net loss	$	(2016,~~997~~355	)	$	(1520,~~682~~997	)	$	(1415,~~225~~682	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

2829

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(In thousands)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2016			2015			2014
	2017			2016			2015
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net loss	$	(2016,~~977~~320	)	$	(1520,~~681~~977	)	$	(1415,~~232~~681	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Discount accretion and other debt-related costs		436		—			—
Depreciation and amortization		6,347			5,946			4,942
Depreciation and amortization		5,946			4,942			3,128
Stock-based compensation		2,927			5,324			5,402
Stock-based compensation		5,324			5,402			4,178
Discount accretion and other debt-related costs		1,417			436			—
Provision for uncollectible amounts		~~287~~59			—287			—
Change in fair value of warrant liability		(~~167~~377	)		(3167	)		~~124~~(3	)
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables		(31,~~932~~884	)		(13,~~403~~932	)		(1,~~076~~403	)
Prepaid expenses		71(1,089	)		~~(623~~71	)		(~~1,021~~623	)
Other current assets		~~(62~~231	)		(~~118~~62	)		~~192~~(118	)
Other long-term assets		(31,~~615~~257	)		~~1,028~~595			~~936~~1,028
Accounts payable		~~375~~(559	)		~~(29~~375	)		~~352~~(29	)
Accrued compensation and related costs		~~(459~~1,010	)		~~520~~(459	)		~~397~~520
Unearned revenue		(21,~~307~~722	)		(2,~~416~~307	)		~~310~~(2,416	)
Other current liabilities		~~722~~1,292			~~(1,675~~722	)		(731,675	)
Other long-term liabilities		~~582~~633			~~3,667~~582			~~(149~~3,667	)
Total adjustments		310,~~201~~796			97,~~292~~411			79,~~298~~292
Net cash used in operating activities		(175,~~776~~524	)		(613,~~389~~566	)		(6,~~934~~389	)
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Capital expenditures		(32,~~714~~998	)		(43,~~917~~714	)		(~~766~~4,917	)
Investment in intangible assets		(~~349~~279	)		(~~171~~349	)		(~~251~~171	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(43,~~063~~277	)		(54,~~088~~063	)		(15,~~017~~088	)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Proceeds from term loan and other borrowings		28,880		—			—
Proceeds from line of credit		26,900			16,246			15,000
Repayments of term loan and other borrowings		(6,945	)		(750	)		—
Repayments of line of credit		(10,000	)		(16,246	)		(15,000	)
Proceeds from line of credit		16,246			15,000			7,000
Proceeds from term loan and other borrowings	—				28,880		—
Repayments of line of credit		(16,246	)		(15,000	)		(7,000	)
Repayments of term loan and other borrowings		(23,512	)		(6,945	)		(750	)
Fees paid for issuance of term loan		(724	)	—			—
Debt prepayment costs		(692	)	—			—
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net	—				15,942			11,138
Fees paid for issuance of term loan		(206	)		(724	)	—
Principal payments on capital lease obligations		(2,296	)		(2,116	)		(1,701	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of costs		14,752		—				15,942
Cash paid to satisfy tax withholding upon employee vesting		(~~440~~1,177	)		(~~874~~440	)		(~~797~~874	)
7% Series B convertible preferred stock dividend		(10	)	—			—
Principal payments on capital lease obligations		(2,498	)		(2,296	)		(2,116	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		236			241			13
7% Series B convertible preferred stock dividend	—				(10	)	—
Proceeds from employee stock purchase		289			212			152
Proceeds from exercise of stock options	—				236			241
Net cash provided by financing activities		18,990			12,655			8,805
Proceeds from employee stock purchase		240			289			212
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(20	)		(9	)		(8	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		3,807			18,990			12,655
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(2,869	)		1,169			846
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(35	)		(20	)		(9	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		15,407			14,238			13,392
(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(5,029	)		1,341			1,169
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	12,538		$	15,407		$	14,238
Cash and cash equivalents		12,538			15,407			14,238
Restricted cash (included in Other long-term assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets)		4,210		—			—
Total cash, beginning of period		16,748			15,407			14,238
Cash and cash equivalents		9,044			12,538			15,407
Restricted cash (included in Other long-term assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets)		2,675			4,210		—
Total cash, end of period	$	11,719		$	16,748		$	15,407
Non-Cash Investing and Financing Transactions:
Capital lease obligations incurred	$	2,~~447~~071		$	2,~~737~~447		$	12,~~692~~737
Capital equipment purchased on credit		2,~~447~~071			2,~~737~~447			12,~~692~~737
Financing of intellectual property purchased, at fair value	—			—	~~1,958~~			—1,958
Issuance of warrant, at fair value		~~924~~—			—924			~~380~~—
Supplemental Disclosures of Cash Flow Information:
Interest paid	$	12,~~343~~476		$	~~314~~1,343		$	~~266~~314

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

2930

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(In thousands, except share data)

	Common Stock Issued															Accumulated
	Shares			Amount			Additional Paid-in Capital			Accumulated Deficit			Treasury Stock			~~Accumulated~~ Other Compre- hensive Loss			Total Stock- holders’ Equity
Balance, December 31, 2013		20,465,984		$	205		$	228,038		$	(212,172	)	$	(8,082	)	$	(4,033	)	$	3,956
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net		2,891,566			29			11,109			—			—			—			11,138
Issuance of common stock for option awards exercised		2,914			—			14			—			—			—			14
Issuance of common stock for warrants exercised		86,366			1			528			—			—			—			529
Issuance of common stock related to employee stock programs		643,706			5			189			—			—			—			194
Amortization/forfeitures of unearned compensation		(44,496	)		—			3,988			—			—			—			3,988
Restricted stock vestings tax withholding		—			—			—			—			(797	)		—			(797	)
Series B convertible preferred stock conversions		937			—			5			—			—			—			5
Series B convertible preferred stock dividend		—			—			(589	)		—			—			—			(589	)
Other comprehensive gain		—			—			—			—			—			7			7
Net loss		—			—			—			(14,232	)		—			—			(14,232	)
Balance, December 31, 2014		24,046,977		$	240		$	243,282		$	(226,404	)	$	(8,879	)	$	(4,026	)	$	4,213
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net		2,728,712			27			15,915			—			—			—			15,942
Issuance of common stock for option awards exercised		41,750			—			282			—			—			—			282
Issuance of common stock for warrants exercised		50,184			1			377			—			—			—			378
Issuance of common stock related to employee stock programs		819,632			8			263			—			—			—			271
Amortization/forfeitures of unearned compensation		(53,819	)		—			5,178			—			—			—			5,178
Restricted stock vestings tax withholding		—			—			—			—			(874	)		—			(874	)
Reissuance of treasury shares		—			—			(514	)		—			514			—			—
Series B convertible preferred stock conversions		3,417			—			17			—			—			—			17
Series B convertible preferred stock dividend		—			—			(588	)		—			—			—			(588	)
Other comprehensive (loss)		—			—			—			—			—			(1	)		(1	)
Other comprehensive loss		—			—			—			—			—			(1	)		(1	)
Net loss		—			—			—			(15,681	)		—			—			(15,681	)
Balance, December 31, 2015		27,636,853		$	276		$	264,212		$	(242,085	)	$	(9,239	)	$	(4,027	)	$	9,137
Issuance of common stock for option awards exercised		—			—			236			—			—			—			236
Issuance of common stock related to employee stock programs		88,282			—			383			—			—			—			383
Amortization/forfeitures of unearned compensation		(220,594	)		(1	)		5,159			—			—			—			5,158
Restricted stock vestings tax withholding		—			—			—			—			(440	)		—			(440	)
Reissuance of treasury shares		—			—			(5,224	)		—			5,224			—			—
Series B convertible preferred stock conversions		6,820			—			34			—			—			—			34
Series B convertible preferred stock dividend		—			—			(586	)		—			—			—			(586	)
Other comprehensive (loss)		—			—			—			—			—			(20	)		(20	)
Other comprehensive loss		—			—			—			—			—			(20	)		(20	)
Net loss		—			—			—			(20,977	)		—			—			(20,977	)
Balance, December 31, 2016		27,511,361		$	275		$	264,214		$	(263,062	)	$	(4,455	)	$	(4,047	)	$	(7,075	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net		5,328,187			53			14,696			—			—			—			14,749
Prior period adjustment related to adoption of ASU 2016-09		—									(43	)								(43	)
Issuance of common stock related to employee stock programs		428,223			4			547			—			—			—			551
Amortization/forfeitures of unearned compensation		(184,753	)		(1	)		2,604			—			—			—			2,603
Restricted stock vestings tax withholding		—			—			—			—			(1,177	)		—			(1,177	)
Reissuance of treasury shares		—			—			(5,515	)		—			5,515			—			—
Series B convertible preferred stock conversions		162			—			1			—			—			—			1
Series B convertible preferred stock dividend		—			—			(584	)		—			—			—			(584	)
Other comprehensive loss		—			—			—			—			—			(35	)		(35	)
Net loss		—			—			—			(16,320	)		—			—			(16,320	)
Balance, December 31, 2017		33,083,180		$	331		$	275,963		$	(279,425	)	$	(117	)	$	(4,082	)	$	(7,330	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

3031

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in millions, except share and per share data)

Note One — Description of Business

Mattersight Corporation and its subsidiaries (collectively, ~~we,~~Mattersight ~~us,~~ or ~~ours~~the company) is a leader in behavioral analytics and a pioneer in personality-based software products. Using a stack of innovative, patented applications, including predictive behavioral routing, performance management, quality assurance, and predictive analytics (collectively, Behavioral Analytics), weMattersight ~~analyze~~analyzes and ~~predict~~predicts customer behavior based on the language exchanged between agents and customers during brand interactions. These insights are then used to facilitate more effective and effortless customer conversations, which, in turn, drive increased customer satisfaction and retention, employee engagement, and operating efficiency. ~~Our~~Mattersight’s analytics are based on millions of proprietary algorithms and the application of unique behavioral models. ~~Our~~Mattersight’s solutions have influenced hundreds of millions of shorter, more satisfying customer interactions for leading companies in the healthcare, insurance, financial services, technology, telecommunications, cable, utilities, education, hospitality, and government industries.

~~Our~~The company’s multi-channel technology captures the unstructured data of voice interactions (conversations), related customer and employee data, and employee desktop activity, and applies millions of proprietary algorithms against those interactions. Each interaction contains hundreds of attributes that get scored and ultimately detect patterns of behavior or business process that provide the transparency and predictability necessary to enhance revenue, improve the customer experience, improve efficiency, and predict and navigate outcomes. Adaptive across industries, programs, and industry-specific processes, ~~our~~the Company’s Behavioral Analytics offerings enable ~~our~~its clients to drive measurable economic benefit through the improvement of contact center performance, customer satisfaction and retention, fraud reduction, and streamlined back office operations. Specifically, through ~~our~~its Behavioral Analytics offerings, weMattersight helps its clients:

•

Identify optimal customer/employee behavioral pairing for call routing;

•

Identify and understand customer personality;

•

Automatically measure customer satisfaction and agent performance on every analyzed call;

•

Improve rapport between agent and customer;

•

Reduce call handle times while improving customer satisfaction;

•

Identify opportunities to improve self-service applications;

•

Improve cross-sell and up-sell success rates;

•

Improve the efficiency and effectiveness of collection efforts;

•

Measure and improve supervisor effectiveness and coaching;

•

Improve agent effectiveness by analyzing key attributes of desktop usage;

•

Predict likelihood of customer attrition;

•

Predict customer satisfaction and Net Promoter Scores^® without customer surveys;

•

Predict likelihood of debt repayment;

•

Predict likelihood of a sale or cross-sell; and

•

Identify fraudulent callers and improve authentication processes.

~~Our~~Mattersight’s mission is to help brands have more effective and effortless conversations with their customers. Using a suite of innovative personality-based software applications, weMattersight can analyze and predict customer behavior based on the language exchanged during service and sales interactions. WeThe ~~operate~~company operates a highly scalable, flexible, and adaptive application platform to enable clients to implement and operate these applications.

3132

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Note Two — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Mattersight and all of its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those amounts.

Basis of Presentation

On ~~January~~April 1, ~~2016~~2017, the company adopted Accounting Standards Update (ASU) ~~2015~~No 2016-0315, ~~Interest~~Statement ~~— Imputation~~ of ~~Interest~~Cash Flows (~~Subtopic~~Topic ~~835-30~~230): ~~Simplifying~~Classification ~~the~~of ~~Presentation~~Certain ofCash ~~Debt~~Receipts ~~Issuance~~and ~~Costs~~Cash Payments. ASU ~~2015~~2016-0315 ~~simplifies~~addresses the presentation ofand ~~debt~~classification ~~issuance costs by conforming the presentation~~ of ~~those~~cash ~~costs~~flows related to ~~that~~specific ~~of debt discounts and premiums~~transactions. ~~The~~Upon ~~standard~~adoption, ~~requires~~the ~~that~~company ~~unamortized~~updated ~~debt~~the ~~issuance~~statement ~~costs~~of ~~related~~cash toflow afor ~~recognized~~all ~~debt~~periods ~~liability~~presented. beCertain ~~presented~~amounts on the ~~balance~~statement ~~sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount~~ of ~~the~~cash ~~debt~~flows ~~liability.~~for ~~Long-term~~December ~~debt~~31, is2016 ~~shown~~were ~~net~~reclassified ~~of unamortized debt issuance costs~~ in ~~the~~compliance ~~company’s~~with ~~consolidated~~this ~~balance sheets~~ASU.

InOn ~~August~~January ~~2014~~1, 2017, the ~~Financial~~company ~~Accounting~~adopted ~~Standards Board (FASB) issued~~ ASU No. ~~2014~~2016-~~15:~~18, ~~Presentation~~Statement of ~~Financial~~Cash ~~Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40)~~Flows: ~~Disclosure~~Restricted ofCash, ~~Uncertainties~~which ~~about~~requires anthat ~~Entity's Ability to Continue as~~ a ~~Going~~statement ~~Concern.~~of ~~The~~cash ~~standard~~flows ~~provides~~explain ~~guidance~~the onchange ~~determining when and how to disclose going concern uncertainties~~ in the ~~financial~~total ~~statements.~~of ~~Management~~cash, ~~will~~cash beequivalents ~~required~~and torestricted ~~perform~~cash. ~~interim~~Certain ~~and~~amounts ~~annual~~on ~~assessments of~~ the ~~Company’s~~statement ~~ability to continue as a going concern within one year~~ of ~~the~~cash ~~date~~flows ~~financial statements are issued. ASU 2014-15 is effective~~ for ~~annual and interim periods ending after~~ December 1531, 2016, ~~with~~and ~~early~~2015 ~~adoption~~were ~~permitted.~~reclassified ~~The~~in ~~Company~~compliance ~~adopted~~with this ~~standard during 2016 with no significant impact on the Company financial statement disclosure~~ASU. ~~See Note Twenty—Subsequent Event.~~

On January 1, 2017, the company adopted ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (Topic 718). This update is intended to simplify the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax impacts, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and presentation on the statement of cash flows. Under ASU 2016-09, the company has elected to account for forfeitures as they occur rather than on an estimated basis. The standard was adopted using a modified retrospective approach which had an immaterial impact on the accumulated deficit balance on January 1, 2017.

On January 1, 2017, the company adopted ASU No. 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740). This update simplifies the presentation of deferred income taxes and requires that deferred income tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet. Upon adoption, all deferred tax assets and liabilities were classified as long term.

On January 1, 2017, to better align expenses, the company changed the caption on the Consolidated Statements of Operations from Research and development to Product development. The company believes the revised presentation provides a clearer understanding of the business expenses in this caption. There was no change to the expense classification and the current period is comparable to the prior period.

Revenue Recognition

Subscription Revenue

Subscription revenue is based on a number of factors, such as the number of users to whom the Company provides one or more of its Behavioral Analytics offerings, the type and number of Behavioral Analytics offerings deployed to the client, and in some cases, the number of hours of calls analyzed during the relevant month of the subscription period. Subscription periods generally range from one to three years after the go-live date or, in cases where the Company contracts with a client for a short-term pilot of a Behavioral Analytics offering prior to committing to a longer subscription period, if any, the subscription or pilot periods generally range from three to twelve months after the go-live date. This revenue is recognized over the applicable subscription period, as the service is performed for the client.

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Other Revenue

Other revenue consists of deployment revenue, professional services revenue, and reimbursed expenses revenue.

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Professional services revenue primarily consists of fees charged to the Company’s clients to provide post-deployment follow-on consulting services, which include custom data analysis, the implementation of enhancements, and training, as well as fees generated from the Company’s operational consulting services. Professional services are performed for the Company’s clients on a fixed-fee or time-and-materials basis. Revenue is recognized as the services are performed, with performance generally assessed on the ratio of actual hours incurred to-date compared with the total estimated hours over the entire term of the contract.

Reimbursed expenses revenue includes billable costs related to travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred while performing services for the Company’s clients. An equivalent amount of reimbursable expenses is included in total cost of other revenue.

Total Cost of Revenue, Exclusive of Depreciation and Amortization

Total cost of revenue primarily consists of labor costs, including salaries, fringe benefits, and incentive compensation, royalties, and other client-related third-party outside services. Total cost of revenue excludes depreciation and amortization.

If the Company’s estimates indicate that a contract loss will occur, then a loss provision is recorded in the period in which the loss first becomes probable and can be reasonably estimated.

~~Research~~Product ~~and~~ Development

~~Research~~Product ~~and~~ development expenses consist primarily of salaries, incentive compensation, commissions, and employee benefits for product development personnel. The personnel costs included in this item are net of any labor costs directly related to the generation of revenue, which are represented in total cost of revenue.

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of salaries, incentive compensation, commissions, and employee benefits for business development, account management, and marketing.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries, incentive compensation, and employee benefits for administrative personnel, as well as facilities costs, a provision for uncollectible amounts, and costs for the Company’s corporate technology infrastructure and applications.

Loss Per Common Share

The per common share basic net loss available to holders of the Company’s Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (Common Stock), has been computed by dividing the net loss available to holders of Common Stock for each period presented by the weighted average shares outstanding. The per common share diluted loss available to holders of Common Stock has been computed by dividing the net loss available to holders of Common Stock by the weighted average shares outstanding plus the dilutive effect of Common Stock equivalents, which is primarily related to our 7% Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (Series B Stock), using the treasury stock method. In periods in which there was a loss, the dilutive effect of Common Stock equivalents is not included in the diluted loss per share calculation as it was antidilutive.

~~Fair Value Measurements~~34

Fair value is an exit price and establishes a three-tier valuation hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. The first tier, Level 1, uses quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 uses inputs, other than quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets, which are observable either directly or indirectly. Level 3 uses unobservable inputs in which there are little or no market data, and requires the entity to develop its own assumptions. A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Fair Value Measurements

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments readily convertible into known amounts of cash (with original purchased maturities of three months or less) to be cash equivalents.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk consist of cash and cash equivalents, which includes foreign bank accounts, and receivables. Cash and cash equivalents consist of money market funds and deposits with high credit quality financial institutions. At times, such deposits may be in excess of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insurance limit. Accounts in the United States are insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation up to $250,000. At December 31, ~~2016~~2017, the Company had non-interest-bearing cash and interest-bearing money market balances in excess of federally insured limits by $11.82 million. The Company’s receivables are derived from billings to clients located primarily in the United States and are denominated in U.S. dollars. For 2016, there were three clients that accounted for 10% or more of total revenue: United HealthCare Services, Inc.; CVS Caremark Corporation, and Progressive Casualty Insurance Company; which accounted for 33%, 15%, and 11% of total revenue, respectively. For 2015, there were three clients that accounted for 10% or more of total revenue: United HealthCare Services, Inc.; Progressive Casualty Insurance Company; and CVS Caremark Corporation, which accounted for 31%, 15%, and 13% of total revenue, respectively. For 2014, there were three clients that accounted for 10% or more of total revenue: United HealthCare Services, Inc.; Progressive Casualty Insurance Company; and Health Care Service Corporation; which accounted for 25%, 20%, and 11% of total revenue, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, two clients, United HealthCare Services, Inc. and CVS Caremark Corporation, accounted for 41% and 27% of total gross accounts receivable, respectively. As of December 31, 2015, two clients, United HealthCare Services, Inc. and CVS Pharmacy, Inc. accounted for 46% and 19% of total gross accounts receivable, respectively.

Clients Accounting for 10% or More of Total Revenue:

	2017			2016			2015
United HealthCare Services, Inc.		28	%		33	%		31	%
CVS Caremark Corporation		16	%		15	%		13	%
TriWest Healthcare Alliance Corp		14	%		9	%		2	%
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company		8	%		11	%		15	%

Clients Accounting for 10% or More of Accounts Receivable:

	2017			2016
United HealthCare Services, Inc.		29	%		41	%
CVS Caremark Corporation		13	%		27	%
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company		13	%		—

Equipment and Leasehold Improvements

Computers, software, furniture, and equipment are carried at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the useful life or the lease term. The useful life for computers and software is between one and three years. For enterprise software applications where a longer useful life is deemed appropriate, five years is used. For furniture and equipment, a useful life of five years is used. Maintenance and repair costs are expensed as incurred. The cost and related accumulated depreciation of assets sold or disposed of are eliminated from the respective accounts and the resulting gain or loss is included in the statements of operations. The carrying value of equipment and leasehold improvements is only reviewed if a triggering event occurs to assess recoverability based on future undiscounted cash flows. An impairment loss, if any, would be measured as the excess of the carrying value over the fair value.

The Company accounts for software developed for internal use in accordance with the guidance provided under ASC Topic 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other, which addresses accounting for the costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal use. As such, costs incurred that relate to the planning and post-implementation phases of development are expensed. Costs incurred during the application development stage are capitalized and amortized over the asset’s estimated useful life, which is generally three to five years.

The Company leases certain equipment using both capital leases and operating leases. Assets leased under capital leases are recorded at the lesser of the amount financed and present value of future lease payments and depreciated on a straight line basis. All capital leases are for terms of twenty-four, thirty, or thirty-six months.35

Goodwill

Goodwill is tested annually for impairment or more frequently if an event or circumstance indicates that an impairment loss may have been incurred. In performing our annual impairment test, we first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value, including goodwill. If it is concluded that this is the case, we perform a detailed quantitative assessment using a two-step test approach. In the first step, the fair value of the reporting unit is compared with its carrying value. If the fair value exceeds the carrying value, then goodwill is not impaired and no further testing is performed. The second step is performed if the carrying value exceeds the fair value. The implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill must be determined and compared with the carrying value of the goodwill. If the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then an impairment loss equal to the difference will be recorded. The Company currently operates in a single business segment or reporting unit.

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

InThe ~~2016,~~Company ~~after~~leases ~~completing~~certain ~~our~~equipment ~~annual~~using ~~qualitative~~both ~~review,~~capital weleases ~~concluded~~and ~~that~~operating itleases. ~~was~~Assets ~~not~~leased ~~more~~under ~~likely~~capital ~~than~~leases ~~not~~are ~~that~~recorded at the ~~carrying~~lesser ~~value~~ of ~~our~~the ~~reporting~~amount ~~unit~~financed ~~exceeded~~and ~~its~~present ~~fair~~ value. ~~Accordingly,~~of wefuture ~~concluded~~lease ~~that~~payments ~~further~~and ~~quantitative~~depreciated ~~analysis~~on ~~and~~a ~~testing~~straight ~~was~~line ~~not~~basis. ~~required,~~All ~~and~~capital noleases ~~goodwill~~are ~~impairment~~for ~~charge~~terms ~~was~~of ~~required~~twenty-four, thirty, or thirty-six months.

Goodwill

Goodwill is tested annually for impairment or more frequently if an event or circumstance indicates that an impairment loss may have been incurred. In performing the annual impairment test, a qualitative assessment is performed to determine whether the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. If the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value, then an impairment loss equal to the difference will be recorded. The Company currently operates in a single business segment or reporting unit.

In 2017, after completing its annual qualitative review, the company concluded that it was not more likely than not that the carrying value of our reporting unit exceeded its fair value. Accordingly, the company concluded that further quantitative analysis and testing was not required, and no goodwill impairment charge was required.

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets subject to amortization are assessed for impairment at least annually or when indicated by a change in economic or operational circumstances. The impairment assessment of these assets requires management to first compare the book value of the amortizing asset to undiscounted cash flows only if there are indicators of a change in circumstances. If the book value exceeds the undiscounted cash flows, management is then required to estimate the fair value of the assets and record an impairment loss for the excess of the carrying value over the fair value and annually challenge the useful lives.

Income Taxes

The Company uses an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting of income taxes. Deferred income taxes are provided when tax laws and financial accounting standards differ with respect to the amount of income for the year, the basis of assets and liabilities and for tax loss carryforwards.

The Company has recorded income tax valuation allowances on its net deferred tax assets to account for the unpredictability surrounding the timing of realization of its U.S. and non-U.S. net deferred tax assets due to continuing operating losses. The valuation allowances may be reversed at a point in time when management determines realization of these tax assets has become more likely than not, based on a return to or achieving predictable levels of profitability.

The Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Significant judgment is used to determine the likelihood of the benefit.

Unearned Revenue

Stockholders’ Equity

Stockholders’ equity includes Common Stock issued, additional paid-in capital, accumulated deficit, treasury stock, and accumulated other comprehensive loss. The 1.6 million shares of Series B Stock outstanding as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and ~~2015~~2016 are not classified as permanent equity or a liability in the accompanying balance sheets. These shares of Series B Stock are conditionally redeemable and do not meet the definition of a mandatorily redeemable financial instrument. The holders of Series B Stock have the ability to initiate a redemption upon the occurrence of certain events that are considered outside the Company’s control.

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Foreign Currency Translation

The functional currencies for the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are their local currencies. All assets and liabilities of foreign subsidiaries are translated to U.S. dollars at end of period exchange rates. The resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a component of stockholders’ equity and comprehensive loss. Income and expense items are translated at average exchange rates prevailing during the period.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the vesting period. Determining fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date requires certain assumptions. The Company uses historical information as the primary basis for the selection of expected life, expected volatility, and expected dividend yield assumptions~~, and anticipated forfeiture rates~~. The risk-free interest rate is selected based on the yields from U.S. Treasury Strips with a remaining term equal to the expected term of the options being valued.

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Stock Warrants

In accordance with ASC 480-10, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, the Company classified certain warrants to purchase Common Stock as liabilities that do not meet the requirements for classification as equity. Such liabilities are initially recorded at fair value with subsequent changes in fair value recorded as a component of gain or loss on warrant liability on the consolidated statements of operations in each reporting period. Fair value of the warrants was measured using a Black-Scholes model. See Note ~~Seventeen~~ Eighteen—Fair Value Measurements.

Segments

The Company operates in a single business segment, focused primarily on Behavioral Analytics.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~January~~July 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ~~Accounting Standards Update (~~ASU) No. 2017-~~04, Intangibles~~11—~~Goodwill~~Earnings Per Share (Topic 260); Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480); Derivatives and ~~Other~~Hedging (Topic 815): (Part I) Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features, ~~simplifying~~(Part II) Replacement of the ~~test~~Indefinite Deferral for ~~goodwill~~Mandatorily ~~impairment.~~Redeemable ~~This~~Financial ~~ASU~~Instruments ~~simplifies~~of ~~how~~Certain anNonpublic ~~entity~~Entities isand ~~required~~Certain toMandatorily ~~test~~Redeemable ~~goodwill~~Noncontrolling ~~for~~Interests ~~impairment~~with bya ~~eliminating~~Scope ~~Step~~Exception 2to ~~from~~address narrow issues identified as a result of the ~~goodwill~~complexity ~~impairment~~associated ~~test.~~with ~~Step~~applying 2generally ~~measures~~accepted aaccounting ~~goodwill~~principles ~~impairment~~for ~~loss~~certain byfinancial ~~comparing~~instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity. Part I of the ~~implied~~update ~~fair~~changes ~~value~~the classification analysis of acertain ~~reporting~~equity-linked ~~unit’s~~financial ~~goodwill~~instruments (or embedded features) with down round features. Part II of the ~~carrying~~update ~~amount~~re-characterizes the indefinite deferral of ~~that~~certain ~~goodwill.~~provisions ~~Goodwill~~of ~~impairment~~Topic ~~will~~480 that now beare ~~the~~presented ~~amount~~as bypending ~~which~~content in the codification, to a ~~reporting~~scope ~~unit’s~~exception. ~~carrying~~Part ~~value~~II ~~exceeds~~does ~~its~~not ~~fair~~have ~~value~~an accounting effect. This ASU is effective for ~~reporting~~fiscal ~~periods beginning after December 15~~years, ~~2019~~ and interim periods within those ~~annual~~fiscal ~~periods~~years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The company is currently evaluating the impact of this update on ~~the~~its ~~company’s~~ consolidated financial statements.

In ~~November~~May ~~2016~~2017, the FASB issued ASU No. ~~2016~~2017-1809, ~~Statement~~Compensation—Stock ofCompensation ~~Cash~~(Topic ~~Flows~~718): ~~Restricted~~Scope ~~Cash~~of Modification Accounting, which provides guidance about which changes to ~~clarify~~the ~~how~~terms ~~restricted~~or ~~cash~~conditions ~~should~~of bea ~~presented~~share-based inpayment ~~the~~award ~~cash~~require ~~flow~~an ~~statement~~entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. This ~~update~~ASU is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those annual periods. ~~Upon~~ ~~adoption~~The ofcompany ~~this~~is ~~ASU~~currently ~~restricted~~evaluating ~~cash~~the ~~will~~impact ~~roll~~of ~~into~~this ~~cash~~update ~~and cash equivalents~~ on ~~the~~its ~~cash~~consolidated ~~flow~~financial ~~statement~~statements.

In ~~October~~January ~~2016~~2017, ~~the~~ FASB issued ASU No. ~~2016~~2017-1604, ~~Income~~Intangibles—Goodwill ~~Taxes:~~and ~~Intra-Entity~~Other, ~~Transfers~~simplifying ofthe ~~Assets~~test ~~Other~~for ~~Than~~goodwill ~~Inventory,~~impairment. ~~which~~This ~~requires~~ASU simplifies how an entity is required to ~~recognize~~test goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the ~~income~~goodwill ~~tax~~impairment ~~consequences~~test. ofStep ~~intra-entity~~2 ~~transfers,~~measures ~~other~~a ~~than~~goodwill ~~inventory,~~impairment ~~when~~loss by comparing the ~~transfer~~implied ~~occurs.~~fair ~~Under~~value ~~current~~of ~~guidance~~a inreporting ~~U.S.~~unit’s ~~GAAP,~~goodwill inwith the ~~case~~carrying amount of ~~depreciable~~that orgoodwill. ~~amortizable~~Under ~~assets~~this update, goodwill impairment will be measured as the ~~income~~amount ~~tax~~by ~~consequences~~which ~~are~~a ~~deferred~~reporting atunit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value. An entity still has the ~~time~~option ofto perform the ~~intra-entity~~qualitative ~~transfer~~assessment ~~and~~for ~~recognized~~a asreporting unit to determine if the ~~assets~~quantitative ~~are~~impairment ~~depreciated~~test oris ~~amortized~~needed. This ASU is effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, ~~2017~~2019 and interim periods within those annual periods,. ~~and~~Early ~~requires~~adoption ~~modified~~is ~~retrospective~~permitted ~~transition~~for ~~with~~interim aor ~~cumulative~~annual ~~catch-up~~goodwill ~~adjustment~~impairment totests ~~opening~~performed ~~retained~~on ~~earnings~~testing indates ~~the~~after ~~period~~January of1, ~~adoption~~2017. The company is ~~currently~~ evaluating the ~~impact~~standard ofand ~~this~~does ~~update~~not onexpect ~~the~~a ~~company’s~~change ~~consolidated~~in ~~financial~~value ~~statements.~~of goodwill when the standard is adopted.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which applies to all entities that are required to present a statement of cash flows under Topic 230. ASU 2016-15 addresses the presentation and classification of cash flows related to (i) debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, (ii) settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing, (iii) contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, (iv) proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, (v) proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies (including bank-owned life insurance policies), (vi) distributions received from equity method investees, (vii) beneficial interests in securitization transactions, and (viii) separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. The amendments in this update are effective for public business entities for periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The company is currently evaluating the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements.37

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. This update broadens the information that an entity must consider in developing its expected credit loss estimate for assets measured either collectively or individually. The update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The company is currently evaluating the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting (Topic 718). This update is intended to simplify the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax impacts, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and presentation on the statement of cash flows. The guidance also allows employers to repurchase more of an employee’s shares for tax withholding purposes without triggering liability accounting. In addition, the guidance allows for a policy election to account for forfeitures as they occur rather than on an estimated basis. The

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments — Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. This update broadens the information that an entity must consider in developing its expected credit loss estimate for assets measured either collectively or individually. The update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, ~~2016~~2019. The company is currently evaluating the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). This update is intended to improve financial reporting of leasing transactions. The ASU will require organizations that lease assets to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases. This update is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The company is currently evaluating the impact of this update on its consolidated financial statements. Certain operating leases the company is party to are expected to be recognized as assets and liabilities as a result of adopting this standard.

In ~~November~~May ~~2015~~2014, ~~the~~ FASB issued ASU ~~No. 2015~~2014-~~17,~~09: ~~Income~~Revenue ~~Taxes~~from Contracts with Customers (Topic ~~740~~606). This update ~~simplifies~~sets forth a new five-step revenue recognition model that replaces the ~~presentation~~prior ofrevenue ~~deferred~~recognition ~~income~~guidance ~~taxes~~in its entirety and ~~requires~~is intended to eliminate numerous industry-specific pieces of revenue recognition guidance that ~~deferred~~have ~~income~~historically ~~tax~~existed. ~~liabilities~~The ~~and~~underlying ~~assets~~principle beof ~~classified~~the asnew ~~noncurrent~~standard inis athat ~~classified~~an ~~statement~~organization will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of ~~financial~~promised ~~position~~goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects what it expects in exchange for the goods or services. ~~The~~ASU ~~update~~2014-09 provides alternative methods of initial adoption and is effective for ~~reporting~~annual periods beginning after December 15, ~~2016~~2017 and interim periods within those annual periods. The ~~adoption~~company is continuing to assess the impact of adopting ASU ~~2015~~2014-1709. The company has completed its assessment of material contracts and management does not expect a significant change in revenue recognition or operating cash flows when ASU 2014-09 is adopted. The accounting for the incremental costs of obtaining and fulfilling a contract is not expected to change, as the company already defers these costs and amortizes them over the anticipated period of benefit. Additional processes and internal controls have abeen ~~material~~implemented ~~impact~~to enable and maintain compliance with ASU 2014-09’s disclosure requirements. Some significant effects on the balance sheet are expected as a result of the guidance regarding contract balances. The company’s ~~consolidated~~has ~~financial~~elected ~~statements~~to adopt the modified retrospective transition method. The company expects the cumulative adjustment to beginning retained earnings as a result of adoption of ASU 2014-09 to be immaterial.

In May 2014, FASB issued ASU 2014-09: Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). This update sets forth a new five-step revenue recognition model that replaces the prior revenue recognition guidance in its entirety and is intended to eliminate numerous industry-specific pieces of revenue recognition guidance that have historically existed. The underlying principle of the new standard is that an organization will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects what it expects in exchange for the goods or services. ASU 2014-09 provides alternative methods of initial adoption and is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is not permitted prior to December 15, 2016. Based on its preliminary assessment, the company generally does not expect a significant change in revenue recognition when ASU 2014-09 is adopted. The Company will be putting additional processes and controls in place to enable compliance with ASU 2014-09’s disclosure requirements.

Note Three — Receivables

Receivables consist of the following:

	December 31, 2016		December 31, 2015
	December 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
Amounts billed to clients	$	86.86	$	48.28
Unbilled revenue		—		0.7
Allowances for doubtful accounts		—		0.3
		8.8		4.9
Receivables, net	$	6.6	$	8.5
Allowances for doubtful accounts		0.3		—
Receivables, net	$	8.5	$	4.9

Amounts billed to clients represent fees and reimbursable project-related expenses. Unbilled revenue represents fees, project-related expenses, materials, and subcontractor costs performed in advance of billings in accordance with contract terms. Unbilled revenue at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 consists of amounts due from clients and is anticipated to be collected within normal terms. The Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its clients to make required payments and clients indicating their intention to dispute their obligation to pay for contractual services provided by us. If the financial condition of the Company’s clients were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be required.

Note Four — Current Prepaid Expenses

Current prepaid expenses primarily consist of deferred deployment costs, prepaid technology maintenance costs and prepaid commissions related to Behavioral Analytics contracts. These costs are recognized over the subscription periods of the respective contracts, generally one to three years after the go-live date or, in cases where the Company contracts with a client for a short-term pilot of a Behavioral Analytics offering prior to committing to a longer subscription period, if any, the subscription or pilot periods generally range from three to twelve months after the go-live date. Costs included in current prepaid expenses will be recognized within the next twelve months.

3738

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Current prepaid expenses consisted of the following:

	December 31, 2016		December 31, 2015
	December 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
Deferred costs	$	1.7	$	1.6
Prepaid technology maintenance costs	$	2.0	$	0.8
Prepaid commissions		1.2		1.4
Deferred deployment costs		1.9		1.7
Other		1.5		1.6
Prepaid commissions		1.1		1.2
Total	$	4.4	$	4.6
Other		0.8		0.7
Total	$	5.8	$	4.4

Note Five — Equipment and Leasehold Improvements

Equipment and leasehold improvements consist of the following:

	December 31, 2016			December 31, 2015
	December 31, 2017			December 31, 2016
Computers and software	$	2428.38		$	1924.83
Furniture and equipment		0.7			0.3
Leasehold improvements		4.0			4.3
Leasehold improvements		4.3			3.2
Furniture and equipment		0.8			0.7
Equipment and leasehold improvements, gross		2933.36			2329.3
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(1925.70	)		(1419.87	)
Equipment and leasehold improvements, net	$	98.6		$	89.56

Depreciation and amortization expense was $5.58 million, $45.45 million, and $34.04 million, for ~~2016~~2017, ~~2015~~2016, and ~~2014~~2015, respectively. Assets acquired under capital leases were $2.41 million, $2.74 million, and $12.7 million, in ~~2016~~2017, ~~2015~~2016, and ~~2014~~2015, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense on capital lease assets was $2.05 million, $2.20 million, and $12.72 million, in ~~2016~~2017, ~~2015~~2016, and ~~2014~~2015, respectively.

The carrying value of equipment and leasehold improvements is only reviewed if a triggering event occurs to assess recoverability based on future undiscounted cash flows. An impairment loss, if any, would be measured as the excess of the carrying value over the fair value. There was a triggering event as of December 31, ~~2016~~2017 and December 31, ~~2015~~2016; however no impairment was required to be recognized.

Note Six — Intangible Assets

Intangible assets reflect costs related to patent and trademark applications, marketing managed services customer relationships and the purchase of certain intellectual property rights. The costs related to patent and trademark applications and the purchase of certain intellectual property are amortized over 120 months. The other intangible assets are fully amortized. Currently, amortization expense of intangible assets is expected to be $0.4 million annually.

	December 31, 2016			December 31, 2015
	December 31, 2017			December 31, 2016
Patents and trademarks	$	34.70		$	3.47
Intellectual property		3.3			3.3
Gross intangible assets		7.03			6.7.0
Accumulated amortization of intangible assets		(34.83	)		(3.48	)
Total	$	3.20		$	3.32

3839

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Note Seven — Other Long-Term Assets

Other long-term assets includes the long-term portion of restricted cash, prepaid technology and maintenance support, deferred deployment costs, and prepaid commissions related to Behavioral Analytics~~, and restricted cash~~. Restricted cash represents cash used to collateralize certain letters of credit issued to support the company’s equipment leasing activities. ~~These costs are recognized over the terms of the respective contracts, generally one to three years.~~ Costs included in long-term assets will be recognized over the remaining term of the contracts beyond the first twelve months. Other long-term assets consisted of the following:

	December 31, 2016		December 31, 2015
	December 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
Restricted cash	$	4.2.7	$	—4.2
Deferred costs		0.6		0.9
Prepaid technology and maintenance support		1.9		0.6
Other prepaid expenses		0.6		0.3
Deferred deployment costs		1.2		0.6
Prepaid commissions		~~0.5~~—		10.25
Other		0.12		0.1
Total	$	6.0	$	26.50

Note Eight — Employee Benefit Plans

The Company’s U.S. employees are eligible to participate in the Mattersight Corporation 401(k) Plan (the Plan) on the first day of the month coinciding with or following their date of hire. The Plan allows employees to contribute up to 30% of their eligible compensation and up to 100% of their bonus compensation, subject to IRS statutory limits. For 2017, 2016 and 2015, the employer match contribution was $0.5 million, $0.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively. ~~For 2014, Mattersight suspended the employer matching contributions for U.S. plans.~~

Note Nine — ~~Stock-Based~~Other ~~Compensation~~Current Liabilities

The Company has two stock-based compensation plans: the Mattersight Corporation 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the 1999 Plan) and the Mattersight Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the ESPP).

	December 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
Accrued vendor payable	$	1.9	$	1.9
Deferred rent liability		0.5		0.4
Warrant liability		0.4		0.8
Other		0.6		0.3
Total	$	3.4	$	3.4

~~Under~~On ~~the~~August ~~1999 Plan~~1, ~~awards of restricted stock~~2016, ~~salary~~the ~~replacement,~~company ~~commissions,~~issued ~~stock~~a ~~options,~~warrant ~~and stock appreciation rights may be granted~~ to ~~directors,~~Hercules ~~officers~~Capital, ~~employees~~Inc., ~~consultants,~~(Hercules) ~~independent~~that ~~contractors,~~gives ~~and~~Hercules ~~agents of~~ the ~~Company~~right ~~and~~to ~~its~~purchase ~~subsidiaries.~~shares ~~Awards granted under the 1999 Plan are made at the discretion~~ of the ~~Compensation Committee of the Company~~company’s ~~Board~~common ofstock ~~Directors~~at ~~(the~~$3.50 ~~Compensation~~per ~~Committee)~~share. IfThe ~~shares~~warrant oris ~~options~~exercisable ~~awarded~~for ~~under the 1999 Plan are not issued due to cancellation of unvested or unexercised options or shares~~357,142 ~~then those~~ shares orof ~~options~~common ~~again~~stock ~~become~~and ~~available~~expires ~~for issuance under the 1999 Plan. Under the 1999 Plan,~~ on ~~the~~August ~~first day of each year~~1, ~~the~~2023. ~~aggregate~~The ~~number~~warrant ofis ~~shares~~accounted ~~available~~ for ~~issuance~~as ~~under~~a ~~the~~liability ~~1999~~and ~~Plan~~carried isat ~~automatically~~fair ~~increased~~market byvalue anusing ~~amount equal to 5% of~~ the ~~total~~Black-Scholes ~~number of shares of Common Stock that are outstanding~~model. Changes Atin the ~~2008~~warrant’s ~~Annual~~fair ~~Meeting~~market ofvalue ~~Stockholders,~~are ~~stockholders~~recognized ~~approved~~in ~~the~~non-operating ~~amendment~~income ~~and~~(expense) ~~restatement~~in of the ~~1999~~consolidated ~~Plan~~statements ~~to increase the number~~ of ~~shares available for issuance under the 1999 Plan by 1,500,000~~operations.

Stock-based compensation expense was $5.3 million, $5.4 million, and $4.2 million, for 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. The Company recognizes stock compensation expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. The Company does not recognize the windfall tax benefit related to the excess tax deduction because the Company currently does not anticipate realizing the tax savings associated with this deduction. See Note ~~Fifteen~~Ten —~~Income~~ ~~Taxes.~~Leases

AsCapital of December 31, 2016, there were a total of 2,471,347 shares of Common Stock available for future grants under the 1999 Plan and from treasury stock. The Company’s Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol MATR.Leases

~~Restricted~~Assets ~~Stock~~under capital leases consist of computer hardware and related equipment. The gross amount of assets recorded under capital leases was $7.3 million and $6.5 million at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. Depreciation expense related to assets under capital leases is included in depreciation and amortization expense on the consolidated statements of operations.

Restricted stock awards are shares of Common Stock granted to an individual that do not immediately vest but rather vest over a period of time. During the vesting period, the holder of granted restricted stock receives all of the benefits of ownership (right to dividends, voting rights, etc.), other than the right to sell or otherwise transfer any interest in the stock. In addition to the Annual Grant (as defined under the section titled Stock Options below), each non-employee director receives 10,000 shares of restricted stock annually, the day after the Company’s annual stockholders’ meeting, which vest 25% at the end of the month in which awarded and the remaining balance vests over the following three quarters.

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Restricted stock award activity was as follows for 2014, 2015, and 2016:

	Shares			Weighted Average Price
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2013		450,223		$	6.25
Granted		609,355		$	5.70
Vested		(458,888	)	$	6.12
Forfeited		(44,496	)	$	6.13
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2014		556,194		$	5.76
Granted		825,120		$	6.78
Vested		(493,270	)	$	6.18
Forfeited		(53,819	)	$	6.15
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2015		834,225		$	6.49
Granted		950,340		$	3.89
Vested		(380,218	)	$	5.34
Forfeited		(220,594	)	$	5.98
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2016		1,183,753		$	4.87

	2016		2015		2014
Total fair value of restricted stock awards vested	$	1.6	$	3.3	$	2.6
Compensation expense related to restricted stock awards	$	4.0	$	2.3	$	1.7

As of December 31, 2016, there remains $2.9 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to restricted stock awards. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.6 years. The Company estimated the forfeiture rate at 3% for 2016, 2015, and 2014.

Stock Options

Stock option awards may be in the form of incentive or non-qualified options. Stock options are granted with an exercise price per share equal to the fair market value of a share of the common stock on the date of grant, and have a maximum term of 10 years. The stock option terms are set by the Compensation Committee and generally become exercisable over a period of four years. The vesting can begin in equal monthly or quarterly increments over the vesting period.

Each non-employee director, upon commencing service, receives a non-qualified stock option to purchase 50,000 shares of Common Stock that vests ratably over a period of 48 months. Additionally, each non-employee director receives a non-qualified stock option to purchase 10,000 shares of Common Stock, granted annually the day after the Company’s annual stockholders’ meeting (the Annual Grant). Stock options granted to non-employee directors have an exercise price per share equal to the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the grant date, and are exercisable for up to 10 years.

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

~~Option~~As ~~activity~~of ~~was~~December as31, ~~follows~~2017, ~~for~~ the ~~years~~future ~~presented~~minimum lease payments due under capital leases are expected to be as follows:

	Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)		Weighted Average Fair Value of Option Grants
(In millions)
Outstanding as of December 31, 2013		2,014,238		$	7.98		7.0
Year	Amount
Exercisable as of December 31, 2013		1,204,786		$	9.66		5.8
2018	$	2.2
Granted		654,000		$	5.63			$	3.33
2019		1.1
Exercised		(2,914	)	$	5.15
2020		0.2
Forfeited		(28,728	)	$	5.85
Total minimum lease payments	$	3.5
Outstanding as of December 31, 2014		2,636,596		$	7.42		6.8
Less: estimated executory costs		—
Exercisable as of December 31, 2014		1,582,165		$	8.70		5.6
Net minimum lease payments	$	3.5
Outstanding intrinsic value at December 31, 2014	$	2.1
Less: amount representing interest		(0.3	)
Exercisable intrinsic value at December 31, 2014	$	1.1
Present value of minimum lease payments	$	3.2
Granted		222,625		$	6.57			$	3.55
Exercised		(59,638	)	$	4.76
Forfeited		(192,166	)	$	7.47
Outstanding as of December 31, 2015		2,607,417		$	7.41		6.0
Exercisable as of December 31, 2015		1,967,825		$	7.97		5.2
Outstanding intrinsic value at December 31, 2015	$	2.4
Exercisable intrinsic value at December 31, 2015	$	1.8
Granted		115,000		$	3.82			$	1.85
Exercised		(56,250	)	$	4.20
Forfeited		(74,026	)	$	6.13
Outstanding as of December 31, 2016		2,592,141		$	7.36		4.9
Exercisable as of December 31, 2016		2,282,476		$	7.61		4.5
Outstanding intrinsic value at December 31, 2016	$	—
Exercisable intrinsic value at December 31, 2016	$	—

		2016				2015				2014
Compensation expense related to option awards		$	1.1			$	1.7			$	1.4

Assets acquired under capital leases included in equipment and leasehold improvements (see Note Five—Equipment and Leasehold Improvements):

	2016			2015			2014
	December 31, 2017			December 31, 2016
Total fair value of stock options vested	$	1.1		$	1.7		$	1.3
Computers and software	$	7.3		$	6.5
Intrinsic value of stock options exercised		—			0.1			—
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(4.1	)		(2.9	)
Proceeds received from option exercises		0.2			0.3			—
Computers and software, net	$	3.2		$	3.6

AsOperating of December 31, 2016, there remained $0.9 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.4 years. The Company forfeiture rate was not applied as the impact was negligible.Leases

The ~~following~~Company ~~table~~leases ~~summarizes~~various office facilities under leases expiring at various dates through August 31, 2024. Additionally, the ~~stock~~Company ~~options~~leases ~~granted~~various ~~during~~property and office equipment under operating leases, generally under three year terms, expiring at various dates. Certain lease agreements contain escalating rent clauses, which require higher rent payments in future years. The Company expenses rent on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, including any rent-free periods. In addition, the Company received certain leasehold improvement incentives, and recorded these incentives as deferred rent, which is amortized as a reduction of rent expense over the life of the lease. Net deferred rent on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 was $2.4 million, $2.6 million, and ~~2014~~$2.0 bymillion, ~~range~~respectively. ofRental ~~exercise~~expense ~~price:~~for all operating leases approximated $1.5 million, $1.3 million, and $1.7 million, for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.

	2016		2015		2014
Options granted		115,000		222,625		654,000
Range of exercise price	$3.57 - $4.40		$6.13 - $6.90		$4.88 - $6.38

In 2017, the Company extended its operating lease for the Edina facility. The initial lease began June 1, 2011 and terminates August 31, 2024. In 2016, the Company entered into an operating lease to relocate its Austin facility. The initial lease term, which became effective on April 1, 2016, terminates on August 31, 2023. In 2015, the Company entered into an operating lease to relocate its corporate headquarters to Chicago, Illinois. The initial lease term, which became effective on July 1, 2015, terminates on July 31, 2022. The leases include one five-year renewal option.

~~The~~Future ~~vesting~~minimum ~~schedule~~rental ~~for~~commitments ~~options~~under ~~granted~~non-cancelable isoperating ~~one~~leases ~~of the following: (1) vesting 6.25% quarterly,~~ with ~~the~~terms ~~balance~~in ~~vesting~~excess ~~ratably over the following 15 quarters, (2) vesting 25% at the end~~ of ~~the~~one ~~month~~year inare ~~which~~as ~~awarded~~follows: ~~and the remaining balance vesting over the following 12 quarters~~ (~~3) vesting 25% at the end of the month~~ in ~~which awarded and the remaining balance vesting over the following 3 quarters.~~millions)

Year	Amount
2018	$	0.9
2019		0.7
2020		0.6
2021		0.7
2022		0.8
Thereafter		0.5
Total minimum payments required	$	4.2

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

~~The~~Note Eleven ~~fair~~— ~~value~~Debt ~~for options granted during 2016, 2015, and 2014 was estimated on the date of grant using a Black Scholes option-pricing model. The Company used the following weighted average assumptions:~~

	2016			2015			2014
Risk-free interest rates		0.81	%		1.03	%		1.4	%
Expected dividend yield		—			—			—
Expected volatility		54	%		58	%		65	%
Expected lives	5.5 years			6.0 years			6.0 years

On June 29, 2017, the company entered into a loan agreement with CIBC Bank USA f/k/a The PrivateBank and Trust Company (CIBC). The loan agreement provides for a revolving line of credit to the company with a maximum credit limit of $20.0 million, which matures on June 29, 2020 (the credit facility). The credit facility is secured by a security interest in the company’s assets. The company, subject to certain limits and restrictions, may from time to time request the issuance of letters of credit under the loan agreement.

~~Historical~~The ~~Company~~principal ~~information~~amount isoutstanding under the ~~primary~~credit ~~basis~~facility ~~for~~will ~~the~~accrue ~~selection~~interest ofat ~~expected~~a ~~life,~~floating ~~expected~~annual ~~volatility~~rate equal to 1 month, ~~and~~2 ~~expected~~month ~~dividend~~or ~~yield~~3 ~~assumptions~~month LIBOR (as selected by the company) plus 4.50%, ~~The~~payable ~~risk-free~~monthly. ~~interest~~In ~~rate~~addition, isthe ~~selected~~company ~~based~~will pay a non-use fee on the ~~yields~~credit ~~from~~facility Uof 25 basis points (0.S25%) per annum of the average unused portion of the credit facility. The ~~Treasury~~amount ~~Strips~~the company may borrow under the credit facility is limited to five times the company’s monthly recurring revenue (as determined in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the loan agreement), multiplied by a ~~remaining~~dynamic ~~term~~churn ~~equal~~factor that is based upon the ratio of recurring revenue retained in the prior twelve month period relative to the ~~expected~~total ~~term~~amount of recurring revenue at the ~~options~~beginning ~~being~~of ~~valued~~the period.

~~Employee~~The ~~Stock~~loan ~~Purchase~~agreement ~~Plan~~imposes various restrictions on the company, including usual and customary limitations on the ability of the company to incur debt and to grant liens upon its assets, increasing restrictions based on thresholds, prohibits certain consolidations, mergers, and sales and transfers of assets by the company and requires the company to comply with a trailing twelve months of total revenue and quarterly EBITDA (as adjusted in accordance with the loan agreement) targets. The loan agreement includes usual and customary events of default (with customary grace periods, as applicable) and provides that, upon the occurrence of an event of default, payment of all amounts payable under the loan agreement may be accelerated and/or the lender’s commitments may be terminated. In addition, upon the occurrence of certain insolvency or bankruptcy related events of default, all amounts payable under the loan agreement will automatically become immediately due and payable, and the lender’s commitments will automatically terminate.

~~The~~On ~~ESPP~~June is29, ~~intended~~2017, tothe ~~qualify~~company asdrew an$13.5 ~~employee~~million ~~stock~~on ~~purchase~~the ~~plan~~revolving ~~under~~line ~~section~~of ~~423~~credit. ofThe proceeds were used to repay the ~~Internal~~principal ~~Revenue~~balance ~~Code~~of $22.5 Wemillion ~~adopted~~under the ~~ESPP~~company’s inprior ~~1999~~credit ~~and~~facility ~~amended~~with ~~and~~Hercules. ~~restated~~Upon repayment, the ~~ESPP~~company interminated ~~May~~its ~~2007~~loan ~~and~~agreement ~~February~~with ~~2016~~Hercules. ~~Under~~The loss on the ~~ESPP,~~early ~~eligible~~extinguishment ~~employees~~of ~~are~~Hercules ~~permitted~~debt tototaled ~~purchase~~$1.8 ~~shares~~million. It consisted of ~~Common~~a ~~Stock~~prepayment atcharge ~~below-market~~of ~~prices~~$0.7 ~~The~~million, ~~purchase~~acceleration ~~period~~of ~~opens~~unaccreted ondebt ~~the~~discount ~~first~~of ~~day~~$0.6 million, and ~~ends~~acceleration onof ~~the~~unamortized ~~last~~deferred ~~business~~debt ~~day~~costs of ~~each~~$0.5 ~~calendar quarter~~million. AsThe average outstanding balance on the revolving line of ~~December~~credit during for 2017 was $10.3 million. At December 31, ~~2016~~2017, ~~there~~$16.9 million remains ~~85,782~~outstanding ~~shares~~on ~~available~~the ~~for~~revolving ~~issuance~~line ~~under~~of ~~ESPP~~credit with the ability to draw an additional $1.8 ~~The~~million. ~~shares~~There ofwas ~~Common~~also ~~Stock~~$0.7 ~~issued~~million in ~~respect~~letters of ~~employee~~credit ~~purchases~~issued ~~under~~by CIBC against the ~~ESPP~~line ~~during~~of ~~2016,~~credit. ~~2015,~~During January and ~~2014~~February 2018, ~~were~~the ascompany ~~follows:~~repaid $7.5 million of principal on the revolving line of credit.

	2016		2015		2014
Shares of common stock issued		88,282		41,026		34,351
Expense related to ESPP (in thousands)	$	95	$	61	$	44

Debt consisted of the following at December 31, 2017:

The fair value for ESPP purchases during 2016, 2015, and 2014, was estimated using a Black Scholes model. The Company used the following weighted average assumptions:

	December 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
CIBC loan due June 29, 2020, effective borrowing rate of 5.93% at December 31, 2017	$	16.9	$	—
Hercules loan effective rate of 14.50% at December 31, 2016		—		22.5
Furniture loan due May 2021, effective rate of 9.10%		0.1		0.1
Furniture loan due May 2021, effective rate of 9.55%		0.1		0.1
Furniture loan due July 2019, effective rate of 13.98%		0.1		0.1
Total debt⁽¹⁾	$	17.2	$	22.8

	2016			2015			2014
Risk-free interest rates		0.25	%		0.01	%		0.04	%
Expected dividend yield		—			—			—
Expected volatility		48	%		37	%		42	%
Expected lives	0.25 years			0.25 years			0.25 years

(1)

Total debt of $17.2 million at December 31, 2017 includes the current portion of the furniture loans of $0.1 million. As of December 31, 2016, short-term debt was $0.7 million, consisting of $0.6 million related to the current portion of the secured loan with Hercules and $0.1 million related to the current portion of the furniture loans.

Note Ten — Other Current Liabilities

	December 31, 2016		December 31, 2015
Accrued vendor payable	$	1.9	$	0.7
Warrant liability		0.8		—
Deferred rent liability		0.4		0.3
Other		0.3		0.8
Total	$	3.4	$	1.8

On August 1, 2016, the company entered into a secured loan agreement with Hercules Capital, Inc., as agent and lender (Hercules). See Note Twelve – Debt. Concurrent with the loan agreement, the company issued a warrant to Hercules that gives Hercules the right to purchase shares of the company’s common stock at $3.50 per share. Initially, the warrant is exercisable for 357,142 shares of common stock. If the company borrows the entire third tranche of $5.0 million available under the loan agreement, the warrant will be exercisable for 428,570 shares of common stock. The warrant expires on August 1, 2023. The warrant is accounted for as a liability and carried at fair market value using the Black-Scholes model. Upon issuance, the Black-Scholes fair value was determined using a risk-free rate of 1.33%, expected volatility of 53% and an expected term of 7 years. The warrant liability is revalued on a quarterly basis. Changes in the warrant’s fair market value are recognized in non-operating income (expense) in the consolidated statements of operations.

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

~~Note~~Debt ~~Eleven~~maturities —were ~~Leases~~as follows as of December 31, 2017:

Capital Leases

(In millions)
Year	Amount
2018	$	0.1
2019		0.1
2020		16.9
2021		0.1
2022		—

~~Assets~~Letters ~~under capital leases consist~~ of computer hardware and related equipment. The gross amount of assets recorded under capital leases was $6.5 million and $6.0 million at December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. Depreciation expense related to assets under capital leases is included in depreciation and amortization expense on the consolidated statements of operations.Credit

The ~~following~~Company ishas astandby ~~schedule,~~letters ~~by year,~~ of ~~future~~credit ~~minimum~~outstanding ~~lease~~in ~~payments~~the ~~under~~amount ~~capital~~of ~~leases,~~$3.4 ~~together~~million ~~with~~at ~~the~~December ~~present~~31, ~~value~~2017. Letters of ~~the~~credit ~~net~~are ~~minimum~~expected ~~lease~~to ~~payments~~expire asfrom of2018 ~~December 31,~~through ~~2016:~~2023.

(In millions)
Year	Amount
2017	$	2.0
2018		1.5
2019		0.4
2020		—
Total minimum lease payments	$	3.9
Less: estimated executory costs		—
Net minimum lease payments	$	3.9
Less: amount representing interest		(0.3	)
Present value of minimum lease payments	$	3.6

Note Twelve — Other Long-Term Liabilities

Capital leases included in equipment and leasehold improvements (see Note Five—Equipment and Leasehold Improvements):

	December 31, 2017		December 31, 2016
7% Series B convertible preferred stock dividend payable	$	3.2	$	2.6
Deferred rent liability		1.9		2.2
Technology service liability		1.2		—
Deferred income tax liability		0.2		0.3
Intellectual property purchase liability		—		0.8
Total	$	6.5	$	5.9

	December 31, 2016			December 31, 2015
Computers and software	$	6.5		$	6.0
Accumulated depreciation and amortization		(2.9	)		(2.6	)
Computers and software, net	$	3.6		$	3.4

Note Thirteen — Income Taxes

~~Operating~~Loss ~~Leases~~before income taxes consisted of the following:

The Company leases various office facilities under leases expiring at various dates through August 31, 2023. Additionally, the Company leases various property and office equipment under operating leases, generally under three year terms, expiring at various dates. Certain lease agreements contain escalating rent clauses, which require higher rent payments in future years. The Company expenses rent on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease, including any rent-free periods. In addition, the Company received certain leasehold improvement incentives, and recorded these incentives as deferred rent, which is amortized as a reduction of rent expense over the life of the lease. Net deferred rent on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2016, 2015, and 2014 was $2.6 million, $2.0 million, and $0.1 million, respectively. Rental expense for all operating leases approximated $1.3 million, $1.7 million, and $2.0 million, for 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively.

	2017			2016			2015
United States	$	(16.4	)	$	(20.9	)	$	(15.5	)
Foreign		—			—			(0.1	)
Total	$	(16.4	)	$	(20.9	)	$	(15.6	)

~~In 2016, the Company entered into an operating lease to relocate its Austin facility.~~ The ~~initial~~income ~~lease~~tax ~~term,~~benefit ~~which~~(provision) ~~became~~consists ~~effective~~of ~~on April 1, 2016, terminates on August 31, 2023. In 2015,~~ the Company entered into an operating lease to relocate its corporate headquarters to Chicago, Illinois. The initial lease term, which became effective on July 1, 2015, terminates on July 31, 2022. The leases include one five-year renewal option.following:

	2017		2016			2015
Current:
Federal	$	—	$	(0.1	)	$	—
State		—		—			—
Foreign		—		—			—
Total current		—		(0.1	)		—
Deferred:
Federal		0.1		—			—
State		—		—			—
Foreign		—		—			—
Total deferred		0.1		—			—
Income tax benefit (provision)	$	0.1	$	(0.1	)	$	—

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

~~Future~~Total ~~minimum~~income ~~rental~~tax ~~commitments~~benefit ~~under~~differed ~~non-cancelable~~from ~~operating~~the ~~leases~~amount ~~with~~computed ~~terms~~by inapplying ~~excess~~the offederal ~~one~~statutory ~~year~~income ~~are~~tax asrate ~~follows:~~due ~~(in~~to ~~millions)~~the following:

Year	Amount
	2017			2016			2015
2017	$	1.1
Valuation allowance	$	25.7		$	(7.7	)	$	(4.9	)
2018		0.7
Federal tax benefit, at statutory rate		5.7			7.2			5.5
2019		0.6
Stock-based compensation		3.1			—			—
2020		0.5
Deferrals		0.7			—			—
2021		0.5
State tax benefit, net of federal benefit		0.5			0.6			0.4
Thereafter		0.5
Tax reform(1)		(32.2	)		—			—
Total minimum payments required	$	3.9
Expiration of state NOLs		(1.7	)		—			—
Expiration of vested stock options		(1.4	)		—			—
Nondeductible expenses		(0.3	)		(0.3	)		0.1
Other		—			0.1			(1.1	)
Income tax benefit (provision)	$	0.1		$	(0.1	)	$	—

~~Note Twelve~~(1) —On ~~Debt~~December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (H.R. 1) was signed into law. The Company has completed its accounting for tax reform under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act as of December 31, 2017. This act includes, among other items, a permanent reduction to the U.S. corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, and requires immediate taxation of accumulated, unremitted non-U.S. earnings. We did not recognize a liability for the tax on accumulated unremitted non-U.S. earnings because we have an accumulated foreign loss. At December 31, 2017, we recognized a tax benefit of $0.1 million from revaluing U.S. net deferred tax liabilities.

OnThe ~~August~~Company 1,may ~~2016,~~recognize the ~~company~~tax ~~entered~~benefit ~~into~~from aan ~~secured~~uncertain ~~loan~~tax ~~agreement~~position ~~with~~only ~~Hercules.~~if ~~The~~it ~~agreement,~~is ~~which~~more ~~matures~~likely onthan ~~February 1,~~not ~~2020,~~that ~~allows~~ the ~~company~~tax toposition ~~borrow~~will upbe tosustained ~~$30.0~~on ~~million~~examination inby ~~three tranches. On August 1, 2016,~~ the ~~company~~taxing ~~borrowed $22.5 million. The second tranche of up to $2.5 million will become available starting July 1~~authorities, ~~2017~~based ~~and continuing until September 15, 2017, contingent~~ on the ~~company~~technical ~~meeting~~merits ~~certain~~of ~~financial~~the ~~milestones~~position. The ~~third~~tax ~~tranche~~benefits ofrecognized upin tothe ~~$5.0~~financial ~~million~~statements ~~will~~from ~~become~~such ~~available~~a ~~starting~~position ~~September 15,~~should ~~2017~~be ~~and~~measured ~~continuing~~based ~~until~~on ~~September 15,~~the ~~2018,~~largest ~~contingent~~benefit onthat ~~meeting~~has ~~certain~~a ~~financial~~greater ~~milestones,~~than a50% ~~portion~~likelihood of ~~which~~being ~~will~~realized beupon ~~mutually~~ultimate ~~determined~~settlement. bySignificant ~~the~~judgment ~~company~~is ~~and~~used ~~Hercules~~to ~~and~~determine ~~will~~the belikelihood ~~subject~~of tothe ~~approval by Hercules~~benefit.

~~The~~A ~~annual~~reconciliation ~~interest rate is equal to the greater~~ of ~~(i) 9.75% plus~~ the ~~prime~~gross ~~rate~~amounts ~~minus~~of ~~3.50%~~unrecognized ortax ~~(ii)~~benefits ~~9.75%. Additionally, the principal balance will bear compounding payment-in-kind interest~~ at an annual rate of 2.15%. Monthly payments are interest only until December 1, 2017, subject to extension until March 1, 2018 or June 1, 2018 depending on whether certain financial milestones are met. After the ~~interest-only~~beginning ~~period, principal~~ and ~~interest~~end ~~will be due in equal monthly payments. The company may prepay all, but not a portion,~~ of the ~~loan. A prepayment charge of 3.0%, 2.0% or 1.0% of the outstanding balance would be due in~~ year ~~one,~~are inas ~~year two, or after year two, respectively.~~follows:

Initially, the agreement’s covenants require the company (i) to achieve at least 80% of its trailing 6 month projected subscription revenues and (ii) to maintain at least $7.5 million in unrestricted cash. After the company achieves two consecutive quarters of earnings before interest, taxes, and depreciation and amortization of at least $1.0 million, the minimum requirement for unrestricted cash will decrease to $6.0 million. The agreement is secured by substantially all of the company’s assets, including its intellectual property.

	2017		2016		2015
Balance at beginning of year	$	12.7	$	12.7	$	12.7
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year		—		—		—
Additions for tax positions of prior years		—		—		—
Reductions for tax positions of prior years		—		—		—
Reductions for tax positions as a result of lapse of statute		—		—		—
Settlements		—		—		—
Balance at end of year	$	12.7	$	12.7	$	12.7

~~Prior~~Due to ~~entering into~~ the ~~secured~~Company’s ~~loan~~net ~~agreement~~operating ~~with~~loss ~~Hercules~~carryforward ~~Capital~~position, ~~Inc.,~~these ~~the~~unrecognized ~~company~~tax ~~was~~benefits ~~party~~will tonot aimpact ~~credit~~the ~~facility~~Company’s ~~and~~effective ~~term~~tax ~~loan~~rate, ~~with~~if ~~Silicon Valley Bank~~recognized. ~~The~~Any ~~credit~~change ~~facility~~in ~~and~~the ~~term~~amount ~~loan~~of ~~were~~unrecognized ~~terminated~~tax onbenefits ~~August~~within ~~1, 2016. The company used a portion of~~ the ~~proceeds~~next ~~from~~twelve ~~the~~months ~~Hercules~~is ~~Capital,~~not ~~Inc.~~expected ~~secured loan agreement~~ to ~~repay~~result ~~its~~in ~~$6.0~~a ~~million~~significant ~~term~~impact ~~loan~~on ~~with~~the ~~Silicon~~results ~~Valley~~of ~~Bank~~operations ~~and~~or ~~to pay borrowing-related fees and expenses. The company expects to use~~ the ~~remaining~~financial ~~proceeds~~position ~~and~~of ~~any future borrowings under~~ the ~~Hercules secured loan agreement for general corporate purposes~~Company.

InDue to the ~~third~~Company’s ~~quarter~~net operating loss carryforward position, accrued interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as of ~~2016~~December 31, ~~the~~2017 ~~company~~are ~~also~~not ~~entered~~material. ~~into~~Interest ~~financing~~and ~~agreements~~penalties toassociated ~~furnish~~with ~~its~~uncertain ~~new~~tax ~~facility~~positions inare ~~Austin,~~recorded ~~Texas~~as part of income tax expense.

~~Debt~~The ~~consisted~~statutes of limitation for the ~~following~~Company’s atincome ~~December~~tax ~~31,~~returns ~~2016:~~after 2001 effectively remain open for examination by the IRS because the net operating loss carryforward from those years can be examined by the IRS for a period of three years after filing the tax return for the year the loss is used.

(In millions)	Amount
Hercules Capital, Inc. loan due February 1, 2020, effective rate of 14.50%	$	22.5
Furniture loan due May 2021, effective rate of 9.10%		0.1
Furniture loan due May 2021, effective rate of 9.55%		0.1
Furniture loan due July 2019, effective rate of 13.98%		0.1
Total debt(1)	$	22.8

Foreign and U.S. state jurisdictions have statutes of limitations generally ranging from three to five years. The state impact of any federal changes remains subject to examination by various states for a period of up to one year after formal notification to the states. The Company and its subsidiaries may have various state and foreign income tax returns for immaterial jurisdictions in the process of examination throughout the reporting period.

(1) The current portion of the principal due was $0.7 million at December 31, 2016.

The balance of long-term debt in the consolidated balance sheet includes $0.6 million of unamortized debt costs and $0.7 million of unaccreted debt discount.

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

~~Debt~~Deferred ~~maturities~~tax ~~were~~assets asand ~~follows~~liabilities ascomprised ofthe ~~December 31, 2016~~following:

(In millions)
	December 31, 2017			December 31, 2016
Year	Amount
Deferred tax assets:
2017	$	0.7
Net operating loss carryforwards	$	53.9		$	75.2
2018		8.3
Other accruals		4.0			8.8
2019		9.2
Depreciation and amortization, including goodwill		0.7			0.8
2020		4.5
Tax credit carryforward		0.5			0.5
2021		0.1
Valuation allowance		(58.1	)		(83.8	)
Total deferred tax assets		1.0			1.5
Deferred tax liabilities:
Prepaid expenses		(1.1	)		(1.7	)
Total deferred tax liabilities		(1.1	)		(1.7	)
Net deferred tax liability	$	(0.1	)	$	(0.2	)

~~Letters~~Deferred income taxes are not provided on certain undistributed earnings of ~~Credit~~foreign subsidiaries because such foreign subsidiaries are in an accumulated foreign loss position.

~~Restricted~~During ~~cash~~2002, ~~represents~~the ~~cash~~Company ~~used~~established a valuation allowance related to ~~collateralize~~deferred ~~certain~~tax ~~letters~~assets offor ~~credit~~the ~~issued~~U.S. toThis ~~support~~was in addition to the ~~company’s~~valuation ~~equipment~~allowance ~~leasing~~established ~~activities~~in ~~and~~2001 ~~building~~for ~~lease~~non-U.S. ~~spaces~~deferred tax assets. The ~~letters~~Company ofcontinues ~~credit~~to inprovide a valuation allowance on significantly all domestic and foreign deferred tax assets as the ~~amount~~Company has determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets in these jurisdictions will not be realized. As of December 31, 2017, net deferred tax assets of $458.21 million ~~are~~were ~~expected~~fully tooffset ~~expire~~by ~~2017—2023~~a valuation allowance. The ~~restrictions~~Company’s onU.S. ~~cash~~federal ~~are~~net ~~recognized~~operating ~~over~~losses ~~the~~(NOLs) ~~terms~~of $260.5 million and U.S. state NOLs of ~~the~~$108.9 ~~respective~~million ~~contracts~~will expire beginning in 2022 and 2018, ~~generally~~respectively. ~~one~~The Company’s non-U.S. NOLs of $0.8 million are subject to ~~three~~various ~~years~~expiration ~~for~~dates ~~equipment~~beginning ~~leases~~in 2029. The Company also carries $0.5 million in research and ~~seven~~development ~~years~~credit ~~for~~carryforwards ~~building~~that ~~leases~~will expire beginning in 2020.

~~Note~~The ~~Thirteen~~Company’s —ability ~~Other~~to ~~Long~~utilize its NOLs could become subject to significant limitations under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code if the Company were to undergo an ownership change. An ownership change would occur if the stockholders who own or have owned, directly or indirectly, 5% or more of the Company’s Common Stock or are otherwise treated as 5% stockholders under Section 382 and the regulations promulgated thereunder, increase their aggregate percentage ownership of the Company’s stock by more than 50 percentage points over the lowest percentage of the stock owned by these stockholders at any time during the testing period, which is generally the three-~~Term~~year ~~Liabilities~~period preceding the potential ownership change. In the event of an ownership change, Section 382 imposes an annual limitation on the amount of taxable income a corporation may offset with NOL carryforwards. Any unused annual limitation may be carried over to later years until the applicable expiration date for the respective NOL carryforwards. The Company has undergone a Section 382 analysis and does not believe there is currently a limitation on the use of NOLs under Section 382; however, due to ongoing ownership changes, the Company may be subject to significant limitations in the future. If a change in ownership is deemed to have occurred during the past three years, then it may be possible that the Company’s NOL carryforward could be subject to limitation under Section 382 for tax return purposes. However, since its NOL carryforward is fully reserved with a valuation allowance, there would be no impact for financial statement purposes from a Section 382 limitation.

	December 31, 2016		December 31, 2015
7% Series B convertible preferred stock dividend payable	$	2.6	$	2.1
Deferred rent liability		2.2		1.7
Intellectual property purchase liability		0.8		1.6
Deferred tax liability		0.3		0.3
Total	$	5.9	$	5.7

Note Fourteen — Litigation and Other Contingencies

~~Note~~The ~~Fourteen~~Company —is ~~Capital~~a ~~Stock~~party to various agreements, including all client contracts, under which it may be obligated to indemnify the other party with respect to certain matters, including, but not limited to, indemnification against third-party claims of infringement of intellectual property rights with respect to services, software, and ~~Series~~other Bdeliverables ~~Stock~~provided by the Company. These obligations may be subject to various limitations on the remedies available to the other party, including, without limitation, limits on the amounts recoverable and the time during which claims may be made, and may be supported by indemnities given to the Company by applicable third parties. Payment by the Company under these indemnification clauses is generally subject to the other party making a claim that is subject to challenge by the Company. Historically, the Company has not been obligated to pay any claim for indemnification under its agreements, and management is not aware of future indemnification payments that it would be obligated to make.

Under the terms of its Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, the Company’s authorized capital stock consists of (i) 50,000,000 shares of Common Stock, and (ii) 40,000,000 shares of preferred stock (Preferred Stock). Under the terms of the Certificate of Designations of 7% Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, the Company designated 5,000,000 shares of the 40,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock as its Series B Stock. 1,637,948 and 1,644,768 shares of Series B Stock were issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively.

On July 22, 2015, the Company signed a definitive Common Stock Purchase Agreement (the 2015 Purchase Agreement) to raise approximately $16.2 million in gross proceeds in a registered direct offering. Under the terms of the 2015 Purchase Agreement, the Company sold 2,728,712 shares of Common Stock (the Shares). Of the aggregate 2,728,712 Shares, 2,563,238 were sold to certain investors at a price of $5.93 per share and 165,474 were sold to certain officers and directors (including certain of their affiliates) at a price of $6.11 per share. The Shares represented approximately 12% of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock immediately prior to the execution of the 2015 Purchase Agreement. The offering closed on July 23, 2015. The aggregate proceeds that the Company received from the offering, net of fees, were approximately $15.9 million. Proceeds from the offering are being used for general corporate and working capital purposes. Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, which acted as the Company’s financial advisor for the offering, received a fee of $0.2 million. The Shares were sold pursuant to a prospectus supplement dated as of July 22, 2015, in connection with a takedown from the Company’s effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-202744), which was filed with the SEC on March 13, 2015 and declared effective by the SEC on April 8, 2015.

On July 23, 2014, the Company entered into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement (the 2014 Purchase Agreement) with certain accredited investors party thereto (the 2014 Purchasers). Under the terms of the 2014 Purchase Agreement, the Company sold, and the 2014 Purchasers purchased from the Company, 2,891,566 shares of Common Stock (the 2014 Shares), at a price of $4.15 per share, to certain institutional investors. The 2014 Shares represented 15% of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock immediately prior to the execution of the 2014 Purchase Agreement. The offering closed on July 29, 2014. The aggregate gross proceeds, net of fees, that the Company received from the offering were approximately $11.1 million. Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, which acted as the sole placement agent for the offering, received a commission equal to 7% of the aggregate purchase price (excluding certain accounts), for an aggregate commission of $0.8 million, and was reimbursed for its out-of-pocket expenses.

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Under its By-Laws, subject to certain exceptions, the Company has agreed to indemnify its corporate officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the corporate officer or director is, or was, serving at its request in such capacity or in certain related capacities. The Company has separate indemnification agreements with each of its directors and corporate officers that requires it, subject to certain exceptions, to indemnify them to the fullest extent authorized or permitted by its By-Laws and the Delaware General Corporation Law. The maximum potential amount of future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited; however, the Company has a director and officer liability insurance policy that limits its exposure and enables it to recover a portion of any amounts paid under these indemnification agreements. As a result of its insurance policy coverage, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements is minimal. The Company had no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of December 31, 2017.

The Company’s products may be subject to sales tax in certain jurisdictions. If a taxing authority were to successfully assert that we have not properly collected sales or other transaction taxes, or if sales or other transaction tax laws or the interpretation thereof were to change, and we were unable to enforce the terms of our contracts with customers that give us the right to reimbursement for assessed sales taxes, we could incur tax liabilities in amounts that could be material. The Company has considered the changing nature of tax laws, the terms of its customer contracts and its recent audit experience in assessing its exposure to possible and probable sales tax liabilities. Based on its assessment, the company has recorded a sales tax liability of $0.1 million at December 31, 2017.

Note Fifteen — Capital Stock and Series B Stock

Under the terms of its Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, the Company’s authorized capital stock consists of (i) 50,000,000 shares of Common Stock, and (ii) 40,000,000 shares of preferred stock (Preferred Stock). Under the terms of the Certificate of Designations of 7% Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, the Company designated 5,000,000 shares of the 40,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock as its Series B Stock. 1,637,786 and 1,637,948 shares of Series B Stock were issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

On February 23, 2017, the company entered into a definitive purchase agreement for the sale of 5,328,187 shares of its common stock to certain investors and certain officers and directors in a private placement. Under the terms of the agreement, the company raised approximately $16.0 million in gross proceeds by selling 5,228,187 shares to certain investors at a price of $3.00 per share and by selling 100,000 shares to certain officers and directors (including certain of their affiliates) at a price of $3.45 per share. The shares represented approximately 20% of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock immediately prior to the issuance. On March 1, 2017, the company received aggregate gross proceeds, net of fees, of $14.8 million. Proceeds are being used for general corporate, working capital, and debt repayment purposes. Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, which acted as the sole placement agent for the offering, received a commission of $1.1 million, and was reimbursed for its out-of-pocket expenses. The company’s registration statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-217290) was filed with the SEC on April 13, 2017 and declared effective by the SEC on April 26, 2017.

The Series B Stock accrues dividends at a rate of 7% per annum, is entitled to a preference upon liquidation, and is convertible on a one-for-one basis into shares of Common Stock, subject to adjustment for stock splits, stock dividends, and similar actions. The Series B Stock generally votes on a one-for-one basis with the Common Stock, subject to adjustment for certain actions and specified matters as to which the Series B Stock is entitled to a separate class vote.

Note ~~Fifteen~~Sixteen — ~~Income~~Stock-Based ~~Taxes~~Compensation

~~Loss~~The ~~before~~Company ~~income~~has ~~taxes~~two ~~consisted~~stock-based ofcompensation plans: the ~~following:~~Mattersight Corporation 1999 Stock Incentive Plan (the 1999 Plan) and the Mattersight Corporation Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the ESPP).

	2016			2015			2014
United States	$	(20.9	)	$	(15.5	)	$	(14.2	)
Foreign		—			(0.1	)		—
Total	$	(20.9	)	$	(15.6	)	$	(14.2	)

The income tax (provision) benefit consists of the following:

	2016			2015		2014
Current:
Federal	$	(0.1	)	$	—	$	—
State		—			—		—
Foreign		—			—		—
Total current		(0.1	)		—		—
Deferred:
Federal		—			—		—
State		—			—		—
Foreign		—			—		—
Total deferred		—			—		—
Income tax (provision) benefit	$	(0.1	)	$	—	$	—

Total income tax benefit differed from the amount computed by applying the federal statutory income tax rate due to the following:

	2016			2015			2014
Federal tax benefit, at statutory rate	$	7.2		$	5.5		$	5.0
State tax benefit, net of federal benefit		0.6			0.4			0.4
Nondeductible expenses		(0.3	)		0.1			(0.2	)
Other		0.1			(1.1	)		(0.3	)
Valuation allowance		(7.7	)		(4.9	)		(4.9	)
Income tax (provision) benefit	$	(0.1	)	$	—		$	—

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

AUnder ~~reconciliation~~the 1999 Plan, awards of ~~the~~restricted ~~gross~~stock, ~~amounts~~salary replacement, commissions, stock options, and stock appreciation rights may be granted to directors, officers, employees, consultants, independent contractors, and agents of ~~unrecognized~~the ~~tax~~Company ~~benefits~~and its subsidiaries. Awards granted under the 1999 Plan are made at the ~~beginning~~discretion ~~and~~of ~~end~~the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors (the Compensation Committee). If shares or options awarded under the 1999 Plan are not issued due to cancellation of unvested or unexercised options or shares, then those shares or options again become available for issuance under the 1999 Plan. Under the 1999 Plan, on the first day of each year, the aggregate number of shares available for issuance under the 1999 Plan is automatically increased by an amount equal to 5% of the total number of shares of Common Stock that are asoutstanding. ~~follows:~~At the 2008 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, stockholders approved the amendment and restatement of the 1999 Plan to increase the number of shares available for issuance under the 1999 Plan by 1,500,000. Stockholders approved at the 2017 Annual Meeting, to increase the number of shares available for issuance under the ESPP by 250,000.

	2016		2015		2014
Balance at beginning of year	$	12.7	$	12.7	$	12.6
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year		—		—		—
Additions for tax positions of prior years		—		—		0.1
Reductions for tax positions of prior years		—		—		—
Reductions for tax positions as a result of lapse of statute		—		—		—
Settlements		—		—		—
Balance at end of year	$	12.7	$	12.7	$	12.7

Stock-based compensation expense was $2.9 million, $5.3 million, and $5.4 million, for 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. The Company recognizes stock compensation expense ratably over the vesting period. The Company does not recognize the windfall tax benefit related to the excess tax deduction because the Company currently does not anticipate realizing the tax savings associated with this deduction. See Note Thirteen—Income Taxes.

~~Due~~As toof ~~the~~December 31, ~~Company’s net operating loss carryforward position~~2017, ~~these~~there ~~unrecognized~~were ~~tax~~a ~~benefits~~total ~~will~~of ~~not~~3,331,957 ~~impact~~shares ~~the~~of ~~Company’s~~Common ~~effective~~Stock ~~tax~~available ~~rate,~~for iffuture ~~recognized.~~grants ~~Any~~under ~~change in~~ the ~~amount~~1999 ofPlan ~~unrecognized~~and ~~tax~~from ~~benefits~~treasury ~~within~~stock. ~~the~~The ~~next~~Company’s ~~twelve~~Common ~~months~~Stock is ~~not~~traded ~~expected to result in a significant impact~~ on the ~~results~~NASDAQ ofGlobal ~~operations~~Market orunder the ~~financial~~symbol ~~position of the Company~~MATR.

~~Due~~Restricted to the Company’s net operating loss carryforward position, accrued interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2016 are not material. Interest and penalties associated with uncertain tax positions are recorded as part of income tax expense.Stock

~~The~~Restricted ~~statutes~~stock awards are shares of ~~limitation~~Common ~~for~~Stock ~~the~~granted ~~Company’s~~to ~~income~~an ~~tax~~individual ~~returns~~that ~~after~~do ~~2001~~not ~~effectively~~immediately ~~remain~~vest ~~open~~but ~~for~~rather ~~examination~~vest byover a period of time. During the ~~IRS~~vesting ~~because~~period, the ~~net~~holder ~~operating~~of ~~loss~~granted ~~carryforward~~restricted ~~from~~stock ~~those~~receives ~~years~~all ~~can~~of bethe ~~examined~~benefits byof ownership (right to dividends, voting rights, etc.), other than the ~~IRS~~right ~~for~~to asell ~~period~~or otherwise transfer any interest in the stock. In addition to the Annual Grant (as defined under the section titled Stock Options below), each non-employee director receives 10,000 shares of ~~three~~restricted ~~years~~stock annually, the day after ~~filing~~the Company’s annual stockholders’ meeting, which vest 25% at the ~~tax~~end ~~return~~of ~~for~~the month in which awarded and the ~~year~~remaining balance vests over the ~~loss~~following isthree ~~used~~quarters.

~~Foreign~~Restricted ~~and~~stock ~~U.S.~~award ~~state~~activity ~~jurisdictions~~was ~~have~~as ~~statutes~~follows ~~of limitations generally ranging from three to five years. The state impact of any federal changes remains subject to examination by various states~~ for ~~a period of up to one year after formal notification to~~ the ~~states.~~years ~~The Company and its subsidiaries may have various state and foreign income tax returns for immaterial jurisdictions in the process of examination throughout the reporting period.~~presented:

Deferred tax assets and liabilities comprised the following:

	Shares			Weighted Average Price
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2014		556,194		$	5.76
Granted		825,120		$	6.78
Vested		(493,270	)	$	6.18
Forfeited		(53,819	)	$	6.15
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2015		834,225		$	6.49
Granted		950,340		$	3.89
Vested		(380,218	)	$	5.34
Forfeited		(220,594	)	$	5.98
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2016		1,183,753		$	4.87
Granted		1,530,192		$	3.30
Vested		(1,163,992	)	$	4.20
Forfeited		(184,753	)	$	4.98
Nonvested balance at December 31, 2017		1,365,200		$	3.65

	December 31, 2016			December 31, 2015
	2017			2016			2015
Deferred tax assets:
Total fair value of restricted stock awards vested	$	3.8		$	1.6		$	3.3
Net operating loss carryforwards	$	75.2		$	70.8
Compensation expense related to restricted stock awards	$	2.3		$	4.0		$	2.3
Other accruals		8.8			5.6
Depreciation and amortization, including goodwill		0.8			0.4
Tax credit carryforward		0.5			0.5
Valuation allowance		(83.8	)		(75.8	)
Total deferred tax assets		1.5			1.5
Deferred tax liabilities:
Prepaid expenses		(1.7	)		(1.7	)
Total deferred tax liabilities		(1.7	)		(1.7	)
Net deferred tax liability	$	(0.2	)	$	(0.2	)

~~Deferred~~As ~~income~~of ~~taxes~~December 31, ~~are~~2017, ~~not~~there ~~provided~~remains on$3.5 ~~certain~~million ~~undistributed~~of ~~earnings~~unrecognized ofcompensation ~~foreign~~expense ~~subsidiaries~~related ~~that~~to restricted stock awards. These costs are expected to be ~~permanently~~recognized ~~reinvested~~over ina ~~those~~weighted ~~companies~~average period of 1.7 ~~These~~years. ~~earnings~~Under ~~aggregated~~ASU No. 2016-09, in 2017 the Company elected to anno ~~immaterial~~longer ~~amount~~apply ata ~~each~~forfeiture ofrate ~~December 31,~~but to account for forfeitures as incurred. The Company estimated the forfeiture rate at 3% for 2016 and ~~December 31,~~ 2015.

During 2002, the Company established a valuation allowance related to deferred tax assets for the U.S. This was in addition to the valuation allowance established in 2001 for non-U.S. deferred tax assets. The Company continues to provide a valuation allowance on significantly all domestic and foreign deferred tax assets as the Company has determined that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets in these jurisdictions will not be realized. As of December 31, 2016, net deferred tax assets of $83.8 million were fully offset by a valuation allowance. The Company’s U.S. federal net operating losses (NOLs) of $240.8 million and U.S. State NOLs of $127.7 million will expire beginning in 2022 and 2017, respectively. The Company’s non-U.S. NOLs of $0.6 million are subject to

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

~~various~~Stock ~~expiration dates beginning in 2029. The Company also carries $0.5 million in Research and Development credit carryforwards that will expire beginning in 2020.~~Options

~~The~~Stock ~~Company’s~~option ~~ability~~awards tomay ~~utilize~~be ~~its~~in ~~NOLs~~the ~~could~~form ~~become subject to significant limitations under Section 382~~ of ~~the~~incentive ~~Internal~~or ~~Revenue~~non-qualified ~~Code~~options. ifStock ~~the~~options ~~Company~~are ~~were~~granted towith ~~undergo~~ an ~~ownership~~exercise ~~change.~~price Anper ~~ownership~~share ~~change~~equal ~~would~~to ~~occur if~~ the ~~stockholders~~fair ~~who~~market ~~own~~value ~~or have owned, directly or indirectly, 5% or more~~ of ~~the~~a ~~Company’s~~share ~~Common Stock or are otherwise treated as 5% stockholders under Section 382 and the regulations promulgated thereunder, increase their aggregate percentage ownership~~ of the ~~Company’s~~common stock byon ~~more than 50 percentage points over~~ the ~~lowest~~date ~~percentage~~ of ~~the stock owned by these stockholders at any time during the testing period~~grant, ~~which~~and ishave ~~generally~~a ~~the~~maximum ~~three-year~~term ~~period preceding the potential ownership change. In the event~~ of an10 ~~ownership change, Section 382 imposes an annual limitation on the amount of taxable income a corporation may offset with NOL carryforwards~~years. ~~Any~~The ~~unused~~stock ~~annual~~option ~~limitation~~terms ~~may~~are beset ~~carried~~by ~~over to later years until~~ the ~~applicable~~Compensation ~~expiration~~Committee ~~date for the respective NOL carryforwards. The Company has undergone a Section 382 analysis~~ and ~~does~~generally ~~not~~become ~~believe~~exercisable ~~there~~over ~~is currently~~ a ~~limitation~~period ~~on the use~~ of ~~NOLs~~four ~~under~~years. ~~Section 382;~~The ~~however,~~vesting ~~due~~can tobegin ~~ongoing ownership changes (See Note Twenty—Subsequent Event), the Company may be subject to significant limitations~~ in ~~the~~equal ~~future.~~monthly Ifor aquarterly ~~change~~increments inover ~~ownership is deemed to have occurred during~~ the ~~past~~vesting ~~three years, then it may be possible that the Company’s NOL carryforward could be subject to limitation under Section 382 for tax return purposes~~period. ~~However, since its NOL carryforward is fully reserved with a valuation allowance, there would be no impact for financial statement purposes from a Section 382 limitation.~~

~~Note~~Each ~~Sixteen~~non-employee —director, ~~Loss~~upon ~~Per~~commencing ~~Share~~service, receives a non-qualified stock option to purchase 50,000 shares of Common Stock that vests ratably over a period of 48 months. Additionally, each non-employee director receives a non-qualified stock option to purchase 10,000 shares of Common Stock, granted annually the day after the Company’s annual stockholders’ meeting (the Annual Grant). Stock options granted to non-employee directors have an exercise price per share equal to the fair market value of a share of Common Stock on the grant date, and are exercisable for up to 10 years.

~~The~~Option ~~following~~activity ~~table~~was ~~sets~~as ~~forth~~follows ~~the loss per share calculation~~ for the ~~periods~~years presented:

	2016			2015			2014
	Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price			Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)			Weighted Average Fair Value of Option Grants
Net loss	$	(21.0	)	$	(15.7	)	$	(14.2	)
Outstanding as of December 31, 2014		2,636,596		$	7.42			6.8
Dividends related to Series B convertible preferred stock(1)		(0.6	)		(0.6	)		(0.6	)
Exercisable as of December 31, 2014		1,582,165		$	8.70			5.6
Net loss available to common stockholders	$	(21.6	)	$	(16.3	)	$	(14.8	)
Granted		222,625		$	6.57					$	3.55
Per share of Common Stock
Exercised		(59,638	)	$	4.76
Basic/diluted net loss available to common stockholders	$	(0.86	)	$	(0.70	)	$	(0.74	)
Forfeited		(192,166	)	$	7.47
Weighted average shares outstanding (basic and diluted) (in millions)		25.21			23.26			19.92
Outstanding as of December 31, 2015		2,607,417		$	7.41			6.0
Currently anti-dilutive common stock equivalents(2) (in millions)		1.73			2.21			2.02
Exercisable as of December 31, 2015		1,967,825		$	7.97			5.2
Outstanding intrinsic value at December 31, 2015	$	2.4
Exercisable intrinsic value at December 31, 2015	$	1.8
Granted		115,000		$	3.82					$	1.85
Exercised		(56,250	)	$	4.20
Forfeited		(74,026	)	$	6.13
Outstanding as of December 31, 2016		2,592,141		$	7.36			4.9
Exercisable as of December 31, 2016		2,282,476		$	7.61			4.5
Outstanding intrinsic value at December 31, 2016	$	—
Exercisable intrinsic value at December 31, 2016	$	—
Granted		60,000		$	2.55					$	1.27
Exercised	—			$	—
Forfeited		(576,740	)	$	11.15
Outstanding as of December 31, 2017		2,075,401		$	6.16			4.4
Exercisable as of December 31, 2017		2,006,878		$	6.21			4.3
Outstanding intrinsic value at December 31, 2017	$	—
Exercisable intrinsic value at December 31, 2017	$	—

(1) Dividends on 7% Series B convertible preferred stock (Series B stock) are cumulative and have been accrued from July 1, 2012 to December 31, 2016. The total accrued dividends are $2.6 million as of December 31, 2016, which will continue to be accrued until they are declared by the board of directors. Dividends related to Series B convertible preferred stock were accrued but not paid during 2016, 2015 and 2014.

		2017				2016				2015
Compensation expense related to option awards		$	0.5			$	1.1			$	1.7

(2) In periods in which there was a loss, the effect of Common Stock equivalents, which is primarily related to the Series B Stock, was not included in the diluted loss per share calculation as it was antidilutive.

	2017		2016		2015
Total fair value of stock options vested	$	0.6	$	1.1	$	1.7
Intrinsic value of stock options exercised		—		—		0.1
Proceeds received from option exercises		—		0.2		0.3

Note Seventeen — Fair Value Measurements

The Company reports certain assets and liabilities at fair value. Fair value is an exit price and establishes a three-tier valuation hierarchy for ranking the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. The first tier, Level 1, uses quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 uses inputs, other than quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets, which are observable either directly or indirectly. Level 3 uses unobservable inputs in which there are little or no market data, and requires the entity to develop its own assumptions. A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

As of December 31, 2017, there remained $0.2 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to stock options. These costs are expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.1 years. The Company did not apply a forfeiture rate in 2016 or 2015 as the impact was negligible.

The following table summarizes the stock options granted during 2017, 2016, and 2015 by range of exercise price:

	2017		2016		2015
Options granted		60,000		115,000		222,625
Range of exercise price	$	2.55	$3.57 - $4.40		$6.13 - $6.90

The vesting schedule for options granted is one of the following: (1) vesting 6.25% quarterly, with the balance vesting ratably over the following 15 quarters, (2) vesting 25% at the end of the month in which awarded and the remaining balance vesting over the following 12 quarters (3) vesting 25% at the end of the month in which awarded and the remaining balance vesting over the following 3 quarters.

The fair value for options granted during 2017, 2016, and 2015 was estimated on the date of grant using a Black Scholes option-pricing model. The Company used the following weighted average assumptions:

	2017			2016			2015
Risk-free interest rates		1.52	%		0.81	%		1.03	%
Expected dividend yield		—			—			—
Expected volatility		54	%		54	%		58	%
Expected lives	5.5 years			5.5 years			6.0 years

Historical Company information is the primary basis for the selection of expected life, expected volatility, and expected dividend yield assumptions. The risk-free interest rate is selected based on the yields from U.S. Treasury Strips with a remaining term equal to the expected term of the options being valued.

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The ESPP is intended to qualify as an employee stock purchase plan under section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code. We adopted the ESPP in 1999 and amended and restated the ESPP in May 2007 and February 2016. Under the ESPP, eligible employees are permitted to purchase shares of Common Stock at below-market prices. The purchase period opens on the first day and ends on the last business day of each calendar quarter. As of December 31, 2017, there remains 234,389 shares available for issuance under ESPP. The shares of Common Stock issued in respect of employee purchases under the ESPP during 2017, 2016, and 2015, were as follows:

	2017		2016		2015
Shares of common stock issued		101,393		88,282		41,026
Expense related to ESPP (in thousands)	$	92	$	95	$	61

The fair value for ESPP purchases during 2017, 2016, and 2015, was estimated using a Black Scholes model. The Company used the following weighted average assumptions:

	2017			2016			2015
Risk-free interest rates		0.86	%		0.25	%		0.01	%
Expected dividend yield		—			—			—
Expected volatility		53	%		48	%		37	%
Expected lives	0.25 years			0.25 years			0.25 years

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

Note Seventeen — Loss Per Share

The following table sets forth the loss per share calculation for the periods presented:

	2017			2016			2015
Net loss	$	(16.3	)	$	(21.0	)	$	(15.7	)
Dividends related to Series B convertible preferred stock⁽¹⁾		(0.6	)		(0.6	)		(0.6	)
Net loss available to common stockholders	$	(16.9	)	$	(21.6	)	$	(16.3	)
Per share of Common Stock
Basic/diluted net loss available to common stockholders	$	(0.56	)	$	(0.86	)	$	(0.70	)
Weighted average shares outstanding (basic and diluted) (in millions)		30.45			25.21			23.26
Currently anti-dilutive common stock equivalents⁽²⁾ (in millions)		1.56			1.73			2.21

(1)

Dividends on 7% Series B convertible preferred stock (Series B stock) are cumulative and have been accrued from July 1, 2012 to December 31, 2017. The total accrued dividends are $3.2 million as of December 31, 2017, which will continue to be accrued until they are declared by the board of directors. Dividends related to Series B convertible preferred stock were accrued but not paid during 2017, 2016 and 2015.

(2)	In periods in which there was a loss, the effect of common stock equivalents, which is primarily related to the Series B Stock, was not included in the diluted loss per share calculation as it was antidilutive.

Note Eighteen — Fair Value Measurements

The company uses a three-level classification hierarchy of fair value measurements to report certain assets and liabilities at fair value. The first tier, Level 1, uses quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 uses observable market data, such as quoted market prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, or inputs other than quoted prices that are directly observable. Level 3 uses entity-specific inputs or unobservable inputs that are derived and cannot be corroborated by market data. A financial asset or liability’s classification within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The following table presents financial instruments measured at fair value measured on a recurring basis:

	December 31, 2017
	Carrying value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Cash and cash equivalents - money market fund	$	0.5	$	0.5	$	—	$	—
Warrant liability		0.4		—		—		0.4

	December 31, 2016
	Carrying value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Cash and cash equivalents - money market fund	$	12.1	$	12.1	$	—	$	—
Warrant liability		0.8		—		—		0.8

	December 31, 2015
	Carrying value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Cash and cash equivalents - money market fund	$	13.7	$	13.7	$	—	$	—
Warrant liability		—		—		—		—

The following table represents the activity in the Company’s Level 3 warrants during the years ended:

(In millions)	Amount
Level 3 warrants, ending balance at December 31, 2013	$	0.8
Change in fair value of warrant liability		0.1
Warrant exercise		(0.5	)
Level 3 warrants, ending balance at December 31, 2014		0.4
Change in fair value of warrant liability		—
Warrant exercise		(0.4	)
Level 3 warrants, ending balance at December 31, 2015		—
Addition - Hercules warrants, initial fair value		0.9
Change in fair value of warrant liability		(0.1	)
Level 3 warrants, ending balance at December 31, 2016	$	0.8

The carrying values of other cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and short-term debt approximated their fair values as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

The company determined the fair value of the warrant liability, considered a Level 3 liability, using the Black-Scholes model. At December 31, 2016, management used a risk free rate of 2.18%, expected volatility of 53%, and an expected term of 6.59 years. Initially, the warrant is exercisable for 357,142 shares of common stock. If the company borrows the entire third tranche of $5.0 million available under the Hercules secured loan agreement, the warrant will be exercisable for 428,570 shares of common stock. (See Note Ten – Other Current Liabilities). As of December 31, 2016, a probability of 0% was assigned to a draw of the third tranche Significant increases or decreases in any of these inputs in isolation would result in a significantly different fair value.

Fair values for assets and liabilities that are only disclosed and not recorded consist of long-term debt. The fair value of long-term debt was estimated to be $22.8 million at December 31, 2016.

There were no transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 during 2016. There were no assets or liabilities valued at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during 2016.

Note Eighteen — Litigation and Other Contingencies

The Company is a party to various agreements, including all client contracts, under which it may be obligated to indemnify the other party with respect to certain matters, including, but not limited to, indemnification against third-party claims of infringement of intellectual property rights with respect to services, software, and other deliverables provided by the Company. These obligations may be subject to various limitations on the remedies available to the other party, including, without limitation, limits on the amounts recoverable and the time during which claims may be made, and may be supported by indemnities given to the Company by applicable third parties. Payment by the Company under these indemnification clauses is generally subject to the other party making a claim that is subject to challenge by the Company. Historically, the Company has not been obligated to pay any claim for indemnification under its agreements, and management is not aware of future indemnification payments that it would be obligated to make.

MATTERSIGHT CORPORATION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS — (Continued)

~~Under~~The ~~its~~following ~~By-Laws,~~table ~~subject~~represents ~~to certain exceptions,~~ the ~~Company~~activity ~~has agreed to indemnify its corporate officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the corporate officer or director is, or was, serving at its request~~ in such capacity or in certain related capacities. The Company has separate indemnification agreements with each of its directors and corporate officers that requires it, subject to certain exceptions, to indemnify them to the ~~fullest extent authorized or permitted by its By-Laws and the Delaware General Corporation Law. The maximum potential amount of future payments the~~ Company’s ~~could~~Level be3 ~~required~~warrants toduring ~~make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited; however,~~ the ~~Company~~years has a director and officer liability insurance policy that limits its exposure and enables it to recover a portion of any amounts paid under these indemnification agreements. As a result of its insurance policy coverage, the Company believes the estimated fair value of these indemnification agreements is minimal. The Company had no liabilities recorded for these agreements as of December 31, 2016.ended:

(In millions)	Amount
Level 3 warrants, ending balance at December 31, 2014	$	0.4
Change in fair value of warrant liability		—
Warrant exercise		(0.4	)
Level 3 warrants, ending balance at December 31, 2015		—
Addition - Hercules warrants, initial fair value		0.9
Change in fair value of warrant liability		(0.1	)
Level 3 warrants, ending balance at December 31, 2016		0.8
Change in fair value of warrant liability		(0.4	)
Level 3 warrants, ending balance at December 31, 2017	$	0.4

The carrying values of other cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and short-term debt approximated their fair values as of December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

The company determined the fair value of the liability for the warrant issued to Hercules, considered a Level 3 liability, using the Black-Scholes model. At December 31, 2017, management used a risk free rate of 2.24%, expected volatility of 53%, and an expected term of 5.59 years. Significant increases or decreases in any of these inputs in isolation would result in a significantly different fair value (see Note Nine –Other Current Liabilities).

The fair value of long-term debt was estimated to be $17.1 million at December 31, 2017.

There were no transfers of assets or liabilities between Level 1, Level 2, and Level 3 during 2017. There were no assets or liabilities valued at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during 2017.

Note Nineteen — Quarterly Data (Unaudited)

	2017
	1st			2nd			3rd			4th			Year
Total revenue	$	11.0		$	10.6		$	11.3		$	13.6		$	46.5
Gross margin	$	7.5		$	7.2		$	8.2		$	10.1		$	33.0
Operating loss	$	(4.0	)	$	(4.2	)	$	(2.7	)	$	(1.3	)	$	(12.2	)
Loss before income taxes	$	(4.9	)	$	(6.8	)	$	(3.0	)	$	(1.7	)	$	(16.4	)
Net loss available to common stockholders	$	(5.1	)	$	(6.9	)	$	(3.2	)	$	(1.7	)	$	(16.9	)
Per share of common stock:
Basic net loss available to common stockholders	$	(0.19	)	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.56	)
Diluted net loss available to common stockholders	$	(0.19	)	$	(0.22	)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.56	)

	2016
	1st			2nd			3rd			4th			Year
Total revenue	$	10.0		$	9.1		$	10.4		$	12.6		$	42.1
Gross margin	$	6.8		$	5.9		$	7.0		$	8.6		$	28.3
Operating loss	$	(5.6	)	$	(6.0	)	$	(5.0	)	$	(2.2	)	$	(18.8	)
Loss before income taxes	$	(5.8	)	$	(6.2	)	$	(5.8	)	$	(3.1	)	$	(20.9	)
Net loss available to common stockholders	$	(6.0	)	$	(6.3	)	$	(6.0	)	$	(3.3	)	$	(21.6	)
Per share of common stock:
Basic net loss available to common stockholders	$	(0.24	)	$	(0.25	)	$	(0.24	)	$	(0.13	)	$

Filing Compare · Mattersight Corp