UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~March 31~~June 30, 2017

☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 001-35828

Silver Spring Networks, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

43-1966972

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

230 W. Tasman Drive

San Jose, California 95134

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(669) 770-4000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	☐		Accelerated filer	☒

Non-accelerated filer	☐	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	☐

			Emerging growth company	☒

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark whether the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of ~~May~~August 3, 2017, there were approximately 53,~~172~~565,~~269~~579 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

			Page
Note About Forward-Looking Statements		3
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements	4
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss	6
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)	6
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows	7
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	8
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	23
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	3940
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	3941
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	4142
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	4243
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	6364
Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities	6364
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	6364
Item 5.	Other Information	6364
Item 6.	Exhibits	6465
Signatures		6566
Exhibit Index			67

NOTE ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q includes forward-looking statements. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including statements regarding our revenue, billings, backlog, and other aspects of our future results of operations, financial position and cash flows, expected timing, size and benefits of our restructuring plan, the costs and cash expenditures associated with the restructuring plan, our business strategy and plans and our objectives for future operations, are forward-looking statements. The words “believe,” “may,” “will,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “intend,” “expect” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, business strategy, short-term and long-term business operations and objectives, and financial needs. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those described in Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors. Moreover, we operate in a very competitive and rapidly changing environment. New risks emerge from time to time. It is not possible for our management to predict all risks, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements we may make. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the future events and trends discussed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q may not occur and actual results could differ materially and adversely from those anticipated or implied in the forward-looking statements.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. We are under no duty to update any of these forward-looking statements after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or to conform these statements to actual results or revised expectations.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

SILVER SPRING NETWORKS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except for par value)

	March 31,			December 31,
	June 30,			December 31,
	2017			2016
	(unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	4951,~~275~~133		$	50,383
Short-term investments		6766,~~345~~712			67,876
Accounts receivable		4851,~~401~~719			44,770
Inventory		5,~~529~~288			8,040
Deferred cost of revenue		~~208~~32,~~841~~846			194,769
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		811,~~381~~361			12,536
Total current assets		~~387~~219,~~772~~059			378,374
Property and equipment, net		2725,~~451~~978			28,986
Goodwill and intangible assets		10,~~812~~620			11,005
Deferred cost of revenue, non-current		2036,~~624~~906			26,639
Deferred tax assets, non-current		~~506~~496			481
Other long-term assets		2,~~400~~575			1,643
Total assets	$	~~449~~295,~~565~~634		$	447,128
Liabilities and stockholders’ deficit
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	2930,~~644~~428		$	26,785
Deferred revenue		~~322~~96,~~859~~916			292,260
Accrued and other liabilities		3442,~~605~~180			44,146
Total current liabilities		~~387~~169,~~108~~524			363,191
Deferred revenue, non-current		80123,~~315~~063			93,149
Other liabilities		2423,~~797~~332			22,324
Total liabilities		~~492~~315,~~220~~919			478,664
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
Stockholders’ deficit:
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; 53,071 and 52,185 shares issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively		630,928			618,651
Common stock and additional paid-in capital, $0.001 par value; 1,000,000 shares authorized; 53,546 and 52,185 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively		634,586			618,651
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(2,~~095~~009	)		(2,113	)
Accumulated deficit		(~~671~~652,~~488~~862	)		(648,074	)
Total stockholders’ deficit		(4220,~~655~~285	)		(31,536	)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit	$	~~449~~295,~~565~~634		$	447,128

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SILVER SPRING NETWORKS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per share amounts, unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016				2017			2016
Revenue:
Product revenue	$	26214,~~528~~713		$	3269,~~852~~917		$	241,241		$	102,769
Service revenue		23,735			15,768
Services revenue		46,859			52,035			70,594			67,803
Total revenue		50261,~~263~~572			48121,~~620~~952			311,835			170,572
Cost of revenue:
Product cost of revenue		16186,~~027~~491			1541,~~980~~439			202,518			57,419
Service cost of revenue		17,323			15,643
Services cost of revenue		18,543			15,970			35,866			31,613
Total cost of revenue		33205,~~350~~034			3157,~~623~~409			238,384			89,032
Gross profit		1656,~~913~~538			1664,~~997~~543			73,451			81,540
Operating expenses:
Research and development		1817,~~641~~272			1517,~~485~~933			35,913			33,418
Sales and marketing		98,~~103~~893			98,~~550~~622			17,996			18,172
General and administrative		1210,~~266~~881			1011,~~846~~239			23,147			22,085
Restructuring		471,207			39—			1,254			39
Total operating expenses		4038,~~057~~253			3537,~~920~~794			78,310			73,714
Operating loss		(23,144	)		(18,923	)
Operating income (loss)		18,285			26,749			(4,859	)		7,826
Other income (expense), net		543			441
Other income, net		9			333			552			774
Loss before income taxes		(22,601	)		(18,482	)
Income (loss) before income taxes		18,294			27,082			(4,307	)		8,600
Provision for income taxes		(570	)		(32	)
Benefit (provision) for income taxes		332			(961	)		(238	)		(993	)
Net loss	$	(23,171	)	$	(18,514	)
Net income (loss)	$	18,626		$	26,121		$	(4,545	)	$	7,607
Net loss per share
Net income (loss) per share
Basic	$	(0.4435	)	$	(0.3651	)	$	(0.09	)	$	0.15
Diluted	$	(0.4434	)	$	(0.3650	)	$	(0.09	)	$	0.14
Weighted average shares used to compute net loss per share
Weighted average shares used to compute net income (loss) per share
Basic		5253,~~607~~329			5051,~~760~~224			52,970			50,992
Diluted		5254,~~607~~174			5052,~~760~~766			52,970			52,492

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SILVER SPRING NETWORKS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE ~~LOSS~~INCOME (LOSS)

(in thousands, unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016				2017			2016
Net loss	$	(23,171	)	$	(18,514	)
Net income (loss)	$	18,626		$	26,121		$	(4,545	)	$	7,607
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Change in foreign currency translation (net of tax effect of $0 and $0)		~~(32~~100	)		(85114	)		68			(199	)
Net unrealized gain on available for sale investments (net of tax effect of $0 and $0)		50			226
Net unrealized (loss) gain on available for sale investments (net of tax effect of $0 and $0)		(14	)		19			36			245
Other comprehensive income		18			141
Other comprehensive income (loss)		86			(95	)		104			46
Comprehensive loss	$	(23,153	)	$	(18,373	)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	18,712		$	26,026		$	(4,441	)	$	7,653

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SILVER SPRING NETWORKS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOW

(in thousands, unaudited)

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(23,171	)	$	(18,514	)
Net (loss) income	$	(4,545	)	$	7,607
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used for) operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Deferred taxes		(2516	)		—111
Depreciation and amortization		24,~~245~~477			24,~~132~~236
Stock-based compensation		613,~~657~~689			613,~~900~~941
Other non-cash adjustments		81187			60113
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(36,~~560~~979	)		~~3,976~~859
Inventory		2,~~518~~752			~~470~~2,061
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(~~480~~3,642	)		21,~~208~~944
Landlord incentives related to lease		883			—2,275
Deferred cost of revenue		(8151,~~001~~617	)		(8,~~804~~236	)
Accounts payable		34,~~395~~220			~~613~~1,174
Customer deposits		64132			(56	)
Deferred revenue		17(165,~~672~~364	)		20(29,~~054~~988	)
Accrued and other liabilities		37,~~247~~122			(5,~~360~~031	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		14,~~525~~533			37,~~730~~532
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sales of available-for-sale investments		—2,549			422,~~833~~944
Proceeds from maturities of available-for-sale investments		15,~~000~~200			12,~~000~~250
Purchases of available-for-sale investments		(~~500~~6,712	)		(310,~~439~~954	)
Purchases of property and equipment		(1,~~077~~750	)		(417,~~485~~244	)
Net cash used for investing activities		(~~577~~713	)		(23,~~091~~004	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Payments on capital lease obligations		—			(~~144~~285	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		2,~~546~~811			12,~~888~~228
Taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards		(45,~~546~~948	)		(~~334~~3,620	)
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities		(2,000	)		1,410
Net cash used for financing activities		(3,137	)		(1,677	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		~~(56~~67	)		98(136	)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents		(1,108	)		3,147
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		750			2,715
Cash and cash equivalents—beginning of period		50,383			65,264
Cash and cash equivalents—end of period	$	4951,~~275~~133		$	6867,~~411~~979
Supplemental cash flow information—cash paid for income taxes	$	88426		$	3,~~527~~896
Non-cash investing activities:
Unpaid purchases of property and equipment	$	~~442~~362		$	53,~~465~~032

See accompanying Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

SILVER SPRING NETWORKS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

1. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Silver Spring Networks, Inc. (the “Company”, “we”, “us” and “our”) have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or U.S. GAAP, for interim financial information as well as the instructions to Form 10-Q and applicable rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, including normal recurring accruals, considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results of operations for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2017, or any future period. The information included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Risk Factors,” “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk,” and the Consolidated Financial Statements and footnotes thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. The preparation of unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements necessarily requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the condensed consolidated balance sheet dates and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses for the periods presented. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions. As a result, the quarterly results may not be indicative of the full year results.

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Silver Spring Networks, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

Prior Period Adjustments

In the course of preparing the condensed consolidated financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2016, we determined that the cash provided from operating activities was understated and cash provided by investing activities was overstated by $2.3 million in the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2016, as included in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2016. We performed the analysis required by Staff Accounting Bulletin 99, Materiality, to evaluate the materiality of the error, quantitatively and qualitatively, and concluded it was not material to our condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2016. The error was corrected in the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2016 included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

2. Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates

There have been no material changes to our significant accounting policies described in Note 1, Description of Business, Basis of Presentation and Significant Accounting Policies, in Part II, Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 that have had a material impact on our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes, except for our adoption of Accounting Standards Update, or ASU, No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, discussed below.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which simplifies several aspects of the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. This standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. We adopted this new standard on January 1, 2017, which had the following impact on us:

• Income tax accounting – The recognition of previously unrecognized excess tax benefits using the modified retrospective method, which requires a cumulative-effect adjustment to accumulated deficit for previously unrecognized excess tax benefits. The only jurisdiction in which we had previously unrecognized excess tax benefits was in the United States. Since we maintain a full valuation allowance against our U.S. deferred tax assets, no adjustment to our accumulated deficit to reflect the recognition of excess tax benefits from prior years was required upon adoption of this new standard. The effects of recognizing these historical excess tax benefits increased our gross deferred tax assets by $9.1 million for federal and by $0.5 million for state, which were fully offset by the full valuation allowance against our U.S. deferred tax assets. As such, the adoption did not result in any change to our net U.S. deferred tax asset position. Tax benefits previously recorded in additional paid-in capital prior to the adoption of the guidance will remain in additional paid-in capital consistent with the guidance.

•

Cash flow presentation of excess tax benefits – This standard also requires excess tax benefits to be classified as an operating activity, consistent with other income tax cash flows, and may be applied either on a prospective transition or a retrospective transition method. We applied this standard using the prospective transition method, which had no impact to our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the six months ended June 30, 2017.

•

Forfeitures – This standard enabled us to make an election to change from estimating forfeitures to accounting for forfeitures when they occur. We adopted this change on a modified retrospective basis which resulted in us recording a

SILVER SPRING NETWORKS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

~~assets.~~cumulative Aseffect ~~such, the adoption did not result in any~~ change tothat increased our ~~net~~accumulated ~~U.S.~~deficit ~~deferred~~by ~~tax asset position~~$0.2 ~~Tax~~million ~~benefits~~and ~~previously~~increased ~~recorded~~our in additional paid-in capital ~~prior~~by to the ~~adoption~~same ~~of the guidance will remain in additional paid-in capital consistent with the guidance~~amount.

• Cash flow presentation of excess tax benefits – This standard also requires excess tax benefits to be classified as an operating activity, consistent with other income tax cash flows, and may be applied either on a prospective transition or a retrospective transition method. We applied this standard using the prospective transition method, which had no impact to our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2017.

• Forfeitures – This standard enabled us to make an election to change from estimating forfeitures to accounting for forfeitures when they occur. We adopted this change on a modified retrospective basis which resulted in us recording a cumulative effect change that increased our accumulated deficit by $0.2 million and increased our additional paid-in capital by the same amount.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Scope of Modification Accounting. The amendments in ASU 2017-09 provide guidance about which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. The adoption of ASU 2017-09 will become effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. We are currently evaluating the effect that this new guidance will have on us but do not expect this adoption will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350), which is intended to simplify the testing for goodwill impairment by eliminating the second step of the two-step impairment test to measure the amount of an impairment loss. This guidance is effective for our annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect that this new guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash. This standard requires that the amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents would be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The guidance also requires certain disclosures to supplement the statement of cash flows. The guidance is effective for our annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect that this new guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-16, Income Taxes (Topic 740) Intra-Entity Transfers of Assets Other Than Inventory, which requires recognition of the income tax consequences of an intra-entity transfer of an asset other than inventory when the transfer occurs. This guidance is effective for our annual and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the effect that this new guidance will have on us but do not expect this adoption will have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). This standard requires lessees to put most leases on their balance sheets but recognize expenses on their income statements in a manner similar to current lease accounting. The guidance also eliminates current real estate-specific provisions for all entities. For lessors, the guidance modifies the classification criteria and the accounting for sales-type and direct financing leases. All entities will classify leases to determine how to recognize lease-related revenue and expense. This guidance is effective for our fiscal years and interim reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. We are currently evaluating the effect that this new guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), or ASU 2014-09, which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. Under this new guidance, revenue is recognized when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or services. The new guidance also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. The updated standard will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance under U.S. GAAP when it becomes effective and permits the use of either the full retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. In July 2015, the FASB decided to delay the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. The FASB also agreed to allow entities to choose to adopt the standard as of the original effective date. We will not early adopt the standard, and as such, the updated standard will be effective for us in the first quarter of 2018. We have selected to apply the modified retrospective method, and we are currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

We anticipate the new standard will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. While we are continuing to assess all potential impacts of the standard, we currently believe the most significant impact relates to our accounting for contingency provisions, certain software and software-related elements, and costs to obtain or fulfill a contract as explained below:

• Contingency provisions. Contingency provisions currently limit the amount of the total arrangement consideration under multiple deliverable contracts that can be allocated to delivered and accepted products and services. Under the new standard, these provisions are considered variable consideration for which a probability estimate can be

SILVER SPRING NETWORKS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

~~made.~~We Asanticipate athe ~~result,~~new westandard will ~~include~~have ina ~~arrangement~~material ~~consideration~~impact ~~the~~on ~~amounts~~our ~~expected~~consolidated ~~rather~~financial ~~than~~statements. While ~~record~~we ~~deferred~~are ~~revenue~~continuing ~~for~~to ~~the~~assess ~~full~~all ~~amount~~potential impacts of the ~~contingency~~standard, ~~until~~we ~~such~~currently believe the most significant impact relates to our accounting for contingency provisions, ~~have~~certain ~~lapsed.~~software and software-related elements, and costs to obtain or fulfill a contract as explained below:

•

Contingency provisions. Contingency provisions currently limit the amount of the total arrangement consideration under multiple deliverable contracts that can be allocated to delivered and accepted products and services. Under the new standard, these provisions are considered variable consideration for which a probability estimate can be made. As a result, we will include in arrangement consideration the amounts expected rather than record deferred revenue for the full amount of the contingency until such provisions have lapsed.

•

Software and software-related elements under ASC 985-605. Under current GAAP, because we have not yet established VSOE for PCS or professional services, revenue for software and software-related elements under ASC 985-605 is recognized ratably over the longest service period. The requirement to have VSOE for undelivered elements to enable the separation of revenue for the delivered software is eliminated under the new standard. Accordingly, under the new standard we will be able to recognize as revenue a portion of the arrangement fee upon delivery of the software.

•

Costs to obtain or fulfill a contract. We currently record sales commissions and costs of providing services in the period incurred. Under ASC 606, such incremental costs are required to be capitalized, then amortized on a basis that is consistent with the recognition of the products and services transferred to the customer. Therefore, we will be required to recognize an asset for such costs with the expense potentially recorded in a future period to match the transfer of products and services.

Due to the complexity of our contracts, the actual revenue recognition treatment required under the new standard for our arrangements may be dependent on contract-specific terms and may vary in some instances.

3. Net income (loss) per share

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing the net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock ~~outstanding~~and ~~plus~~potentially dilutive ~~potential~~securities ~~shares of common stock~~ outstanding during the period. ~~Dilutive~~Potentially ~~potential~~dilutive ~~shares~~securities ~~of common stock~~ consist of common shares issuable upon exercise of stock options, issuances of shares pursuant to the 2012 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, or ESPP, vesting of restricted stock units, or RSUs, and contingently issuable performance stock units, or PSUs~~, to the extent dilutive~~. We include the common shares underlying PSUs in the calculation of diluted net income (loss) per share when they become contingently issuable and exclude such shares when they are not contingently issuable. ~~Certain~~Potentially ~~potential~~dilutive ~~shares~~securities ofare ~~common stock were~~ excluded from the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share ~~because~~if their effect would be anti-dilutive. As we ~~have~~ incurred losses during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017 ~~and 2016~~, basic and diluted net loss per share was the same for ~~these~~the ~~periods~~period presented as the inclusion of all potential common shares outstanding would have been anti-dilutive.

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income (loss) per share (in thousands, except per share data):

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016				2017			2016
Net loss	$	(23,171	)	$	(18,514	)
Net income (loss)	$	18,626		$	26,121		$	(4,545	)	$	7,607
Net loss per share
Net income (loss) per share
Basic	$	(0.4435	)	$	(0.3651	)	$	(0.09	)	$	0.15
Diluted	$	(0.4434	)	$	(0.3650	)	$	(0.09	)	$	0.14
Weighted average shares used to compute net loss per share
Weighted-average shares used to compute net income (loss) per share
Basic		5253,~~607~~329			5051,~~760~~224			52,970			50,992
Diluted		5254,~~607~~174			5052,~~760~~766			52,970			52,492

The following potential common shares outstanding were excluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share because including them would have been anti-dilutive (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	2017		2016
Employee equity awards		7,245		7,177

SILVER SPRING NETWORKS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The following table sets forth the potentially dilutive securities excluded from the computation of diluted net income (loss) per share because including them would have been anti-dilutive (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016			2017	2016
Employee equity awards		3,832		5,407		7,121	5,263

4. Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-Term Investments

Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments consisted of the following as of ~~March 31~~June 30, 2017 (in thousands):

	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Estimated
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
Current assets:
Cash	$	4749,~~240~~098	$	—	$	—		$	4749,~~240~~098
Cash equivalents:
Money market mutual funds		2,035		—		—			2,035
Total cash and cash equivalents		4951,~~275~~133		—		—			4951,~~275~~133
Short-term fixed income securities:
U.S. government and agency obligations		40,~~529~~485		—		(~~199~~217	)		40,~~330~~268
U.S. and foreign corporate debt securities		2726,~~090~~516		3—		(7872	)		2726,~~015~~444
Total short-term investments		67,~~619~~001		3—		(~~277~~289	)		6766,~~345~~712
Total cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments	$	~~116~~118,~~894~~134	$	3—	$	(~~277~~289	)	$	~~116~~117,~~620~~845

Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments consisted of the following as of December 31, 2016 (in thousands):

	Amortized		Unrealized		Unrealized			Estimated
	Cost		Gains		Losses			Fair Value
Current assets:
Cash	$	48,348	$	—	$	—		$	48,348
Cash equivalents:
Money market mutual funds		2,035		—		—			2,035
Total cash and cash equivalents		50,383		—		—			50,383
Short-term fixed income securities:
U.S. government and agency obligations		40,565		—		(209	)		40,356
U.S. and foreign corporate debt securities		27,636		—		(116	)		27,520
Total short-term investments		68,201		—		(325	)		67,876
Total cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments	$	118,584	$	—	$	(325	)	$	118,259

As of ~~March 31~~June 30, 2017, approximately 8177% and 912% of our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments were held with two financial institutions, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, approximately 83% and 9% of our cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments were held with two financial institutions, respectively.

~~Contractual~~As ~~Maturities~~of June 30, 2017, $0.8 million of restricted cash was designated as a collateral for a bank guarantee issued by HSBC Bank USA, National Association, or HSBC, to support our performance obligation under an agreement with one customer. The guarantee will expire in July 2023 unless cancelled on an earlier date; accordingly, we recorded this amount in other long-term assets in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

The contractual maturities of cash equivalents and short-term investments consisted of the following (in thousands):

	As of March 31, 2017				As of December 31, 2016
	Amortized		Aggregate		Amortized		Aggregate
	Cost Basis		Fair Value		Cost Basis		Fair Value
Due within one year	$	33,399	$	33,348	$	19,017	$	18,988
Due from 1 year through 3 years		36,255		36,032		51,219		50,923
Total cash equivalents and short-term investments	$	69,654	$	69,380	$	70,236	$	69,911

SILVER SPRING NETWORKS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

~~The~~Contractual following table presents gross unrealized losses and fair values for those investments that were in an unrealized loss position as of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, aggregated by investment category and the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss position (in thousands): Maturities

	As of March 31, 2017					As of December 31, 2016
	Total (Less Than 12 Months)					Total (Less Than 12 Months)
	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
U.S. and foreign corporate debt securities	$	22,714	$	(78	)	$	27,520	$	(116	)
U.S. government and agency obligations		40,330		(199	)		40,356		(209	)
Total	$	63,044	$	(277	)	$	67,876	$	(325	)

The contractual maturities of cash equivalents and short-term investments were as follows (in thousands):

As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were no investments with unrealized losses for a period in excess of 12 months.

	As of June 30, 2017				As of December 31, 2016
	Amortized		Aggregate		Amortized		Aggregate
	Cost Basis		Fair Value		Cost Basis		Fair Value
Due within one year	$	38,361	$	38,284	$	19,017	$	18,988
Due from 1 year through 3 years		30,675		30,463		51,219		50,923
Total cash equivalents and short-term investments	$	69,036	$	68,747	$	70,236	$	69,911

WeThe ~~periodically~~following ~~review~~table ~~our~~presents ~~marketable~~gross ~~debt~~unrealized ~~securities~~losses ~~for other-than-temporary impairment. We consider factors such as the duration, severity~~ and ~~the~~fair ~~reason~~values for ~~the~~investments ~~decline~~ in ~~value,~~an ~~the~~unrealized ~~potential~~loss ~~recovery~~position period and our intent to sell. We also consider whether it is more likely than not that we will be required to (i) sell the debt securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis, and (ii) the amortized cost basis cannot be recovered as ~~a result~~ of ~~credit~~June ~~losses. As of March 31~~30, 2017, ~~we anticipate that we will recover the entire amortized cost basis of such available-for-sale debt securities~~ and ~~have determined that no other-than-temporary impairments associated with credit losses were required to be recognized during the three months ended March~~December 31, ~~2017 and~~ 2016., Itaggregated isby ~~not~~investment ~~more~~category ~~likely~~(in than not that we will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases. There were insignificant gross realized gains or losses from available-for-sale securities during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016.thousands):

	As of June 30, 2017					As of December 31, 2016
	Total (Less Than 12 Months)					Total (Less Than 12 Months)
	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss			Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
U.S. and foreign corporate debt securities	$	26,444	$	(72	)	$	27,520	$	(116	)
U.S. government and agency obligations		40,268		(217	)		40,356		(209	)
Total	$	66,712	$	(289	)	$	67,876	$	(325	)

As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were no investments with unrealized losses for a period in excess of 12 months.

We periodically review our marketable debt securities for other-than-temporary impairment. We consider factors such as the duration, severity and the reason for the decline in value, the potential recovery period and our intent to sell. We also consider whether it is more likely than not that we will be required to (i) sell the debt securities before recovery of their amortized cost basis, and (ii) the amortized cost basis cannot be recovered as a result of credit losses. As of June 30, 2017 and 2016, we anticipated that we would recover the entire amortized cost basis of such available-for-sale debt securities and determined that no other-than-temporary impairments associated with credit losses were required to be recognized during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016. It is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the investments before recovery of their amortized cost bases. There were insignificant gross realized gains or losses from available-for-sale securities during the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016.

5. Fair Value Measurements

We determine the fair values of our financial instruments based on a fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The classification of a financial asset or liability within the hierarchy is based upon the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Under ASC Topic 820, Fair Value Measurement and Disclosures, the fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value. The fair value framework requires the categorization of assets and liabilities into three levels based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to price the assets or liabilities. The guidance for fair value measurements requires that assets and liabilities carried at fair value be classified and disclosed in one of the following categories:

Level 1—Quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2—Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3—Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which requires us to develop our own assumptions.

Level 1 measurements are obtained from real-time quotes for transactions in active exchange markets involving identical assets. Level 2 measurements are obtained from readily available pricing sources for comparable instruments, identical instruments in less active markets, or models using market observable inputs. We did not have any transfers of financial instruments between valuation levels during the three months ended March 31, 2017 and year ended December 31, 2016.

SILVER SPRING NETWORKS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

active markets, or models using market observable inputs. We did not have any transfers of financial instruments between valuation levels during the six months ended June 30, 2017 and the year ended December 31, 2016.

Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2017, financial assets recorded at fair value on a recurring basis ~~were~~are ~~determined~~summarized ~~using~~below ~~the following inputs~~ (in thousands):

Fair Value Measurement Using

Quoted Prices in

Significant

Active Markets for

Other

~~Significant~~

Identical

Observable

~~Unobservable~~

Instruments

Inputs

~~Inputs~~

(Level 1)

(Level 2)

~~(Level 3)~~Total

~~Total~~

Cash equivalents:

Money-market funds

2,035

—

—2,035

~~2,035~~

Total cash equivalents

2,035

—

—2,035

~~2,035~~

Short-term investments:

U.S. Government and agency obligations

—

40,~~330~~268

—40,268

~~40,330~~

U.S. and foreign corporate debt securities

—

2726,~~015~~444

—26,444

~~27,015~~

Total short-term investments

—

6766,~~345~~712

—66,712

~~67,345~~

Total assets measured at fair value

2,035

6766,~~345~~712

—68,747

~~69,380~~

As of December 31, 2016, financial assets recorded at fair value on a recurring basis ~~were~~are ~~determined~~summarized ~~using~~below ~~the following inputs~~ (in thousands):

	Fair Value Measurement Using
	Quoted Prices in		Significant
	Active Markets for		Other		~~Significant~~
	Identical		Observable		~~Unobservable~~
	Instruments		Inputs		~~Inputs~~
	(Level 1)		(Level 2)		~~(Level 3)~~Total		~~Total~~
Cash equivalents:
Money market mutual funds	$	2,035	$	—	$	—2,035	$	~~2,035~~
Total cash equivalents		2,035		—		—2,035		~~2,035~~
Short-term investments:
U.S. government and agency obligations		—		40,356		—40,356		~~40,356~~
U.S. and foreign corporate debt securities		—		27,520		—27,520		~~27,520~~
Total short-term investments		—		67,876		—67,876		~~67,876~~
Total assets measured at fair value	$	2,035	$	67,876	$	—69,911	$	~~69,911~~

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were no liabilities that are measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2017 and December 31, 2016, wethere ~~had~~were no assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis except for assets and liabilities valued on the date of acquisitions for businesses acquired.

Our intangible assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, if impairment is indicated. During the year ended December 31, 2016, intangible assets were measured at fair value that resulted in the recording of an impairment charge of $2.2 million. We measured the fair value of these assets primarily using discounted cash flow projections. The discounted cash flow projections require estimates for expected performance such as revenue, gross margin and operating expenses in order to discount the sum of future independent cash flows using discount rates. Intangible assets are classified as Level 3 assets due to the absence of quoted market prices. See Note 7, Goodwill and Intangibles Assets, for further information.

As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were no assets and liabilities that were measured and recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis except for assets and liabilities valued on the date of acquisition for businesses acquired.

SILVER SPRING NETWORKS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Assets and Liabilities Not Measured at Fair Value

The carrying amounts of our accounts receivable, accounts payable, and other accrued liabilities approximate fair value due to their short maturities.

6. Business Acquisition

On January 16, 2015, we completed the acquisition of Detectent, Inc., or Detectent, a privately held corporation that provides customer intelligence solutions for utilities leveraging its data analytics platform, and paid $7.6 million in cash consideration. The acquisition of Detectent was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. We paid and held $4.0 million of deferred cash consideration, or contingent payments, in an escrow account, to be released over a two-year period subject to the retention of key employees of Detectent, or retention period. Contingent payments associated with future employment conditions were recorded as compensation expense over the retention period. We released $1.0 million from the escrow account in 2016, and released the remaining $3.0 million from the escrow account in February 2017, upon satisfaction of the retention terms of the acquisition agreement.

7. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill:

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the gross amount of goodwill was $8.8 million.

Intangible Assets:

The following table summarizes the gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization for the intangible assets resulting from acquisitions (in thousands):

		As of March 31, 2017								As of December 31, 2016
		As of June 30, 2017								As of December 31, 2016
	Useful Lives (in years)	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Impairment		Net Book Value		Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Impairment		Net Book Value
Purchased technology	4-6 years	$	4,865	$	2,~~780~~859	$	882	$	1,~~203~~124	$	4,865	$	2,701	$	882	$	1,282
Customer relationships	4-7 years		3,640		1,~~648~~741	$	1,322		~~670~~577		3,640		1,554		1,322		764
Trade name	6 years		369		~~202~~222		—		~~167~~147		369		182		—		187
Total		$	8,874	$	4,~~630~~822	$	2,204	$	21,~~040~~848	$	8,874	$	4,437	$	2,204	$	2,233

Intangible assets subject to amortization are amortized over their useful lives as shown in the table above.

The following table illustrates the amortization expense included in the condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017 and 2016 (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
Amortization of purchased intangible assets:	2017		2016			2017		2016
Cost of revenue	$	7980	$	~~169~~195	$	159	$	364
Sales and marketing		~~106~~104		~~244~~172		210		415
General and administrative		8		8		16		17
Total	$	~~193~~192	$	~~421~~375	$	385	$	796

SILVER SPRING NETWORKS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

The estimated future amortization expense of purchased intangible assets with definite lives for the next five years is as follows (in thousands):

Year Ended December 31,	Amount
Remainder of 2017	$	~~577~~385
2018		738
2019		378
2020		335
2021		12
2022 and thereafter		—
	$	21,~~040~~848

8. Stock-Based Compensation

Equity Incentive Plan and Employee Stock Purchase Plan

As of ~~March 31~~June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, there were 87.21 million and 5.9 million shares, respectively, of common stock reserved for future grants under our ESPP and 2012 Equity Incentive Plan.

Performance Stock Units

In May 2017, we granted to our Chief Executive Officer, or CEO, Chief Financial Officer, or CFO, and other executive officers PSUs to receive up to an aggregate number of 0.2 million shares of our common stock, subject to the achievement of certain performance targets set by the Compensation Committee and such individual’s continued service to us as a director, officer, employee or consultant. The PSUs will become earned and eligible to vest when the performance condition is met. The earned PSUs, if any, will vest in equal annual installments over three years from the date of grant. The aggregate grant-date fair value of these PSUs is approximately $2.3 million based on the closing price of our common stock on the grant date, which will be recognized over the requisite service period using the accelerated attribution method.

Stock Option Activities

The following table summarizes our stock option activity and related information for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017 ~~as follows~~ (in thousands, except per share data):

	Options Outstanding
				Weighted		Weighted
				Average		Average
				Exercise		Remaining		Aggregate
	Number of			Price per		Contractual		Intrinsic
	Shares			Share		Term (years)		Value
Balance at December 31, 2016		4,008		$	12.22
Options granted		—65			—10.95
Options exercised		(~~145~~304	)		1.8569
Options cancelled or expired		(17262	)		16.2659
Balance at March 31, 2017		3,846		$	12.59		5.00	$	8,115
Balance at June 30, 2017		3,507		$	12.79		5.28	$	6,572
As of March 31, 2017
As of June 30, 2017
Options vested and expected to vest		3,~~846~~507		$	12.5979		5.0028	$	86,~~115~~572
Options exercisable		2,~~945~~724		$	12.4172		34.9338	$	76,~~709~~249

The aggregate intrinsic value disclosed above represents the total intrinsic value (the difference between the fair value of our common stock as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2017 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of in-the-money options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on ~~March~~June 3130, 2017. This amount is subject to change based on changes to the fair value of our common stock.

SILVER SPRING NETWORKS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Restricted Stock Units Activities

The following table summarizes our restricted stock units activity and related information for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017 ~~as follows~~ (in thousands, except per share data):

	Restricted Stock Units Outstanding
						Weighted
				Weighted		Average
				Average Grant		Remaining		Aggregate
	Number of			Date Fair Value		Contractual		Intrinsic
	Shares			per Share		Term (years)		Value
Balance at December 31, 2016		3,531		$	11.55
Restricted stock units granted		~~932~~2,387			1211.7201
Restricted stock units vested		(~~896~~1,335	)		12.7390
Restricted stock units cancelled		(~~169~~303	)		13.4811
Performance stock units granted		234			9.91
Performance stock units cancelled		(100	)		7.42
Balance at March 31, 2017		3,298		$	11.59		1.25	$	37,232
Balance at June 30, 2017		4,414		$	10.75		1.52	$	49,784

Stock-based Compensation

We recorded stock-based compensation expense as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016			2017		2016
Cost of revenue	$	1,~~806~~921	$	1,~~328~~389	$	3,727	$	2,717
Research and development		2,~~058~~134		2,~~025~~241		4,192		4,266
Sales and marketing		~~506~~657		~~831~~726		1,163		1,557
General and administrative		2,~~287~~320		2,~~716~~685		4,607		5,401
Stock-based compensation expense	$	67,~~657~~032	$	67,~~900~~041	$	13,689	$	13,941

Stock-based compensation related to our corporate bonus incentive plan was $2.42 million and $2.1.9 million for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Stock-based compensation related to our corporate bonus incentive plan was $4.6 million and $4.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. We recorded these amounts under accrued and other liabilities in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.

The following table presents unrecognized compensation cost to be recognized over a weighted-average period related to unvested stock options, ESPP, RSUs and PSUs as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2017 (in thousands, except year data):

			Weighted
	Unrecognized		Average
	Compensation		Period
	Cost		(Years)
Stock options	$	5.5,064	~~2.4~~	2.3
ESPP	$	~~0.6~~176	~~0.4~~	0.1
RSUs and PSUs	$	~~27.6~~36,547		2.3.0

9. Income Taxes

The provision for income taxes reported for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017 is based on our projected annual effective tax rate for 2017, and includes certain immaterial discrete items recorded during the period. Our income tax benefit and provision for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017 and 2016 reflects an effective tax rate of (21.58%) and 3.5%, respectively. Our income tax provision for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 reflects an effective tax rate of (05.25%) and 11.5%, respectively. Our income tax benefit and expense for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017 primarily comprised of ~~state taxes and~~ foreign taxes associated with our foreign subsidiaries ~~and foreign withholding taxes~~. We have not reported a provision for federal taxes in our condensed consolidated financial statements since we project a ~~taxable loss in the United States for 2017. Our state provision mainly arose from state minimum taxes.~~

SILVER SPRING NETWORKS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

taxable loss in the United States for 2017. Our income tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 consisted primarily of taxes from foreign jurisdictions and states, respectively.

10. Segment Information

We operate in one reportable segment and we are organized as one reporting unit. Our chief operating decision makers are our ~~Chief Executive Officer, or~~ CEO, and ~~Chief Financial Officer, or~~ CFO, who review consolidated operating results to make decisions about allocating resources and assessing performance for the entire company. Revenue by geography is based on the billing address of the customer. The following table presents revenue by geographic region (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016			2017		2016
Revenue:
United States	$	46257,~~331~~957	$	45118,~~222~~539	$	304,288	$	163,761
Australia		1,~~947~~045		21,~~136~~834		2,992		3,969
All Other		12,~~985~~570		1,~~262~~579		4,555		2,842
Total	$	50261,~~263~~572	$	48121,~~620~~952	$	311,835	$	170,572

Substantially all of our long-lived assets are located in the United States.

11. Balance Sheet Details

Inventory

Inventory consisted of the following (in thousands):

	As of March 31,		As of December 31,
	As of June 30,		As of December 31,
	2017		2016
Component parts	$	~~361~~817	$	221
Finished goods		54,~~168~~471		7,819
Inventory	$	5,~~529~~288		8,040

Inventory included consigned inventory of $1.46 million and $1.4 million as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.

Accrued and Other Liabilities

Accrued and other liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

	As of March 31,		As of December 31,
	As of June 30,		As of December 31,
	2017		2016
Accrued payroll and related expenses	$	913,~~945~~572	$	23,506
Accrued operating expenses		12,~~661~~012		4,771
Warranty obligations, current		3,~~942~~767		4,569
Sales, property and income taxes		1,~~091~~172		1,589
Other deferred revenue		1720,~~135~~713		9,292
Customer deposits		~~329~~398		266
Other		~~502~~546		153
Accrued and other liabilities	$	3442,~~605~~180	$	44,146

SILVER SPRING NETWORKS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

Other Liabilities

Other liabilities consisted of the following (in thousands):

	As of March 31,		As of December 31,
	As of June 30,		As of December 31,
	2017		2016
Warranty obligations, non-current	$	1,~~566~~510	$	1,518
Other deferred revenue		1211,~~384~~113		9,573
Deferred rent, non-current		10,~~401~~242		10,801
Other		~~446~~467		432
Other liabilities	$	2423,~~797~~332	$	22,324

Product Warranty

Product warranty activity is as follows (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017
Warranty obligation—beginning of period	$	6,087
Warranty expense for new warranties issued		86246
Utilization of warranty obligation		(~~704~~1,158	)
Changes in estimates for pre-existing warranties		39102
Warranty obligation—end of period	$	5,~~508~~277

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss (AOCI), Net of Tax

The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017 are as follows (in thousands):

				Unrealized Gains
	Foreign Currency			(Losses) on Available
	Adjustment			for Sale Securities			Total
Balance as of December 31, 2016	$	(1,737	)	$	(376	)	$	(2,113	)
Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassification		(32	)		50			18
Other comprehensive income before reclassification		68			37			105
Amounts reclassified from AOCI		—			—(1	)		—(1	)
Other comprehensive (loss) income		(32	)		50			18
Other comprehensive income		68			36			104
Balance as of March 31, 2017	$	(1,769	)	$	(326	)	$	(2,095	)
Balance as of June 30, 2017	$	(1,669	)	$	(340	)	$	(2,009	)

12. Commitments and contingencies

Operating and Capital Leases

Our primary operating lease commitment as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2017, related to our headquarters in San Jose, California, requires monthly lease payments through September 2026.

We recognize rent expense on a straight-line basis over the lease period. Where leases contain escalation clauses, rent abatements, or concessions, such as rent holidays and landlord or tenant incentives or allowances, we apply them in the determination of straight-line rent expense over the lease term. Rent expense for all facility leases was $2.0 million and $2.30 million for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and $4.0 million and $4.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

SILVER SPRING NETWORKS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2017, the future minimum commitments under our operating leases were as follows (in thousands):

	Operating
	Leases
Remainder of 2017	$	64,~~737~~513
2018		9,~~033~~073
2019		7,~~831~~871
2020		7,~~284~~307
2021		7,~~369~~374
2022 and thereafter		34,~~157~~165
Net minimum lease payments	$	7270,~~411~~303

Legal Contingencies

~~EON~~Linex Patent Litigation. In ~~June~~March ~~2011~~2013, ~~EON~~Linex ~~Corp. IP Holdings~~Technologies, ~~LLC~~Inc., a non-producing entity, or ~~EON~~Linex, filed suit against us in United States District Court for the ~~Eastern~~Southern District of ~~Texas,~~Florida. ~~Tyler~~Linex ~~Division~~alleged ~~against~~that uscertain ~~and a number~~ of ~~smart~~our ~~grid~~networking ~~providers. The~~technology ~~lawsuit~~infringes ~~alleges infringement of~~ United States Patent Nos. 56,~~388~~493,~~101,~~377 ~~5,481,546,~~ and 57,~~592~~167,~~491,~~503. orWe ~~the~~filed ~~EON~~an ~~Patents,~~answer byin ~~certain~~May ~~networking~~2013. ~~technology~~In ~~and~~January ~~services~~2014, ~~that~~the wecourt ~~and~~granted the ~~other~~plaintiff’s ~~defendants~~request ~~provide. Other~~for ~~defendants~~a ~~included~~stay ~~Landis+Gyr~~of AGthe ~~(which~~matter, ~~was~~pending ~~acquired~~reexamination byof ~~Toshiba~~the ~~Corporation),~~patents ~~Aclara~~at ~~Power-Line~~issue ~~Systems~~by ~~Inc.,~~the ~~Elster~~United ~~Solutions,~~States ~~LLC,~~Patent ~~Itron, Inc.~~ and ~~Trilliant~~Trademark ~~Networks Inc.~~Office, ~~all~~or ofUSPTO. ~~which~~In ~~settled~~September ~~with~~2014, ~~EON~~Linex ~~prior~~amended tocertain ~~trial.~~patent Weclaims ~~filed answers, affirmative defenses~~ and ~~counterclaims~~canceled ~~denying~~certain ~~the~~other ~~plaintiff’s~~patent ~~allegations~~claims ~~and~~based ~~asserting~~upon ~~that~~ the ~~plaintiff~~USPTO’s ~~patents~~completed ~~are~~reexaminations, ~~invalid.~~and ~~A trial was held~~ in ~~June~~October 2014., ~~After~~ the ~~trial,~~court lifted the ~~jury~~stay ~~determined~~of ~~that~~the wematter. In ~~had~~January ~~infringed certain~~2015, ~~but~~Linex ~~not~~filed ~~all,~~an ofamended ~~the~~complaint ~~claims~~to ~~under~~incorporate facts related to the ~~EON~~completed ~~Patents~~reexaminations, and ~~returned~~we afiled ~~verdict~~an ~~against~~answer usresponding into the ~~amount~~complaint ofand ~~$18.8~~raising ~~million~~additional defenses. ~~Following~~In ~~post-trial~~June ~~motions by both parties~~2015, the court ~~reduced~~stayed the ~~damage~~action ~~award~~pending tothe ~~approximately~~USPTO’s ~~$13.0~~completion ~~million,~~of ~~and~~further inex ~~December~~parte ~~2014,~~reexaminations ~~entered~~of athe ~~final~~patents ~~judgment~~at ~~in that amount plus approximately $1~~issue.~~5 million in pre-judgment interest.~~ ~~The~~In ~~court~~July ~~subsequently~~2017, ~~revised~~ the ~~final~~USPTO ~~judgment~~issued toa ~~include~~reexamination ~~additional~~certificate ~~costs~~with all of ~~about~~the ~~$0.2~~claims ~~million~~cancelled ~~and~~for ~~entered~~the an‘377 ~~amended final judgment in December 2014~~patent. ~~All~~We ofbelieve ~~the~~that ~~EON~~we ~~Patents~~ have ~~expired~~meritorious ~~and~~defenses ~~therefore~~to ~~EON~~Linex’s isallegations ~~not seeking,~~ and ~~EON~~intend ~~may~~to ~~not~~continue ~~recover,~~vigorously ~~any~~defending ~~additional~~against ~~sums~~the ~~as royalties for our sales of products going forward~~action.

InAtlas/ComEd, ~~December 2014~~Atlas/PG&E, weand ~~filed~~Atlas/FP&L aPatent ~~notice of appeal with the U~~Litigation.S. ~~Court~~In ofNovember ~~Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington~~2015, ~~D.C. In~~Atlas ~~order to stay the execution of the final judgment pending the appeal~~IP, inLLC ~~December 2014 we~~ filed aseparate ~~surety~~suits ~~bond~~against inour ~~the~~customers ~~amount~~Commonwealth ofEdison ~~$17.6 million~~Company, ~~which~~or ~~includes an additional 20% of the final judgment for post-judgment interest and expenses expected to be incurred during the appeal process~~ComEd, ~~in accordance with court rules. The bond was issued by Zurich Insurance~~ and isPacific ~~collateralized~~Gas ~~with a standby letter of credit in the amount of $13.0 million, the amount of the damage award, as described in Customer Performance~~ and ~~Other~~Electric ~~Commitments~~Co. ~~Upon completion of the appeal process~~, ~~both~~or ~~the~~PG&E ~~surety~~alleging ~~bond~~infringement ~~and standby letter~~ of ~~credit~~United ~~will~~States bePatent ~~released~~No. ~~In January 2015~~5,371,734 ~~the~~by ~~District~~communications ~~Court~~between ~~accepted~~smart ~~the~~meters ~~bond~~ and ~~entered~~access ~~the~~points ~~stay~~over ~~of execution of the judgment. The appellate hearing took place in November 2015, and in February 2016 the appellate court issued~~ a ~~ruling~~neighborhood ~~reversing~~area ~~the~~network ~~District~~using ~~Court’s~~wireless ~~prior~~communication ~~decision~~modules and ~~judgment~~networking ~~against~~equipment ~~us,~~supplied ~~and~~by ~~holding that no reasonable jury could find we infringed the EON patents~~us. In ~~April~~May 2016, ~~EON~~Atlas filed a ~~petition~~similar ~~for~~suit aagainst rehearing en banc, which the appellate court denied in May 2016. In June 2016, the appellate court notified the District Court that the prior judgment in favor of EON was vacated and that judgment was in our ~~favor,~~customer ~~and~~Florida ~~the~~Power ~~District~~& ~~Court~~Light ~~released our appellate bond obligation. In July 2016 the District Court awarded us $0.6 million in costs~~Company, ~~which~~or ~~EON appealed in August 2016~~FP&L. ~~EON~~We ~~also~~have ~~filed~~agreed ~~a petition for certiorari~~ to ~~the~~assume ~~Supreme Court in October 2016, seeking review of~~ the ~~appellate~~defense ~~court’s reversal of the District Court’s original judgment against us, which the Supreme Court denied~~ in ~~January~~each ~~2017. In February 2017 we agreed with EON that it would pay us $0.5 million in settlement~~ of ~~the~~these ~~cost award, which we received in March 2017~~suits.

~~Linex Patent Litigation~~ComEd. InThe ~~March~~suit ~~2013,~~against ~~Linex~~ComEd ~~Technologies,~~was ~~Inc.,~~filed ain ~~non-producing~~the ~~entity,~~Northern orDistrict ~~Linex,~~of ~~filed~~Illinois ~~suit~~in ~~against~~November us2015, inand ~~United~~also ~~States~~named ~~District~~Exelon ~~Court~~Corp., ~~for~~or ~~the~~Exelon, ~~Southern~~as ~~District~~a ~~of Florida~~defendant. ~~Linex~~In ~~alleged~~January ~~that~~2016, ~~certain~~we offiled ~~our~~a ~~networking~~motion ~~technology~~to ~~infringes~~dismiss ~~United~~the ~~States~~ComEd ~~Patent~~complaint ~~Nos. 6,493,377~~ and ~~7,167,503.~~to Weremove ~~filed~~Exelon anas ~~answer~~a ~~in May 2013~~defendant. In ~~January~~February ~~2014~~2016, the court granted ~~the~~our ~~plaintiff’s~~motion ~~request~~to ~~for~~dismiss ~~a stay of~~ the ~~matter~~complaint, ~~pending~~and ~~reexamination~~dismissed ofExelon from the ~~patents~~case atwith ~~issue by the USPTO~~prejudice. In ~~September~~March ~~2014~~2016, ~~Linex~~Atlas ~~amended~~IP ~~certain~~filed ~~patent~~an ~~claims~~amended ~~and~~complaint ~~canceled~~against ~~certain~~ComEd, ~~other~~which ~~patent claims based upon~~ the ~~USPTO’s~~court ~~completed~~dismissed ~~reexaminations, and~~ in ~~October~~May ~~2014~~2016, ~~the~~finding ~~court lifted~~ the ~~stay~~complaint ofto ~~the~~be ~~matter~~legally insufficient. In ~~January~~The ~~2015,~~court ~~Linex~~awarded ~~filed~~us anreasonable ~~amended~~attorneys’ ~~complaint~~fees toand ~~incorporate~~costs ~~facts~~in ~~related~~July to2016. ~~the~~Atlas ~~completed~~IP ~~reexaminations, and we~~ filed ana ~~answer~~notice ~~responding~~of toappeal ~~the~~in ~~complaint and raising additional defenses. In~~ June ~~2015~~2016, ~~the~~seeking ~~court~~to ~~stayed~~appeal the ~~action~~dismissal ~~pending~~to the ~~USPTO’s~~U.S. ~~completion~~Court of ~~further~~Appeals exfor ~~parte~~the ~~reexaminations~~Federal ofCircuit ~~the~~in ~~patents~~Washington, ~~at issue~~D. WeC. ~~believe~~In ~~that~~May we2017, ~~have~~the ~~meritorious~~Federal ~~defenses~~Circuit toaffirmed ~~Linex’s~~the ~~allegations~~dismissal ~~and~~of ~~intend~~this ~~to continue vigorously defending against the action~~complaint.

PG&E. The suit against PG&E was filed in the Northern District of California. We filed a motion to dismiss the PG&E complaint, which the court granted in March 2016. Atlas IP filed an amended complaint against PG&E, which the court dismissed in June 2016, determining that Atlas IP is collaterally estopped from re-litigating the sufficiency of its complaint as the sufficiency of Atlas IP’s complaint was already decided against Atlas IP by the court in the ComEd suit.

FP&L. The suit against FP&L was filed in the Southern District of Florida in May 2016. In June 2016, the court stayed the action until the conclusion of Atlas IP’s appeal in the ComEd case, pursuant to an agreement between the parties that if the appellate court affirms the dismissal of the ComEd case, it will be dispositive of the FP&L action. In August 2017, following the outcome of the ComEd case, the court dismissed this suit with prejudice.

We believe that we have meritorious defenses to Atlas IP’s allegations in each of these matters, and intend to continue vigorously defending the actions as required.

SILVER SPRING NETWORKS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

~~Atlas/ComEd,~~Acoustic ~~Atlas/PG&E,~~Technology ~~and Atlas/FP&L~~ Patent Litigation. In ~~November~~July ~~2015~~2016, ~~Atlas~~Acoustic IPTechnology, ~~LLC~~Inc., a non-producing entity, filed ~~separate~~suit ~~suits~~in ~~against~~United ~~our~~States ~~customers~~District ~~Commonwealth~~Court ~~Edison~~for ~~Company,~~the orEastern ~~ComEd,~~District ~~and~~of ~~Pacific~~Texas, ~~Gas~~Marshall ~~and~~Division ~~Electric~~against Cous., orThe ~~PG&E~~lawsuit ~~alleging~~alleges infringement of United States Patent NoNos. 5,~~371~~986,~~734~~574, byand ~~communications~~6,509,841 ~~between~~by ~~smart~~certain meters and ~~access~~networking ~~points~~technology ~~over~~and aservices ~~neighborhood~~that ~~area~~we ~~network~~provide. ~~using~~The ~~wireless~~patents ~~communication~~will ~~modules~~expire ~~and~~in ~~networking~~late ~~equipment~~2017 ~~supplied~~and byearly us2018. InWe ~~May~~filed a motion to dismiss, as well as a motion to transfer the matter to the Northern District of California, in September 2016. The motion to transfer was granted in March 2017. Also in March 2017, ~~Atlas~~we filed aseveral ~~similar~~petitions ~~suit~~for ~~against~~inter ~~our~~partes ~~customer~~review ~~Florida~~with ~~Power~~the &USPTO, ~~Light~~requesting ~~Company~~the USPTO to find certain claims of the Acoustic Patents to be unpatentable. In July 2017, orthe ~~FP&L~~court stayed the suit pending review of the petitions for inter partes review by the USPTO. We believe that we have ~~agreed~~meritorious defenses to ~~assume~~Acoustic’s ~~the~~allegations ~~defense~~and inintend ~~each~~to ofvigorously ~~these~~defend ~~suits~~ourselves.

ComEd. The suit against ComEd was filed in the Northern District of Illinois in November 2015, and also named Exelon Corp., or Exelon, as a defendant. In January 2016, we filed a motion to dismiss the ComEd complaint and to remove Exelon as a defendant. In February 2016, the court granted our motion to dismiss the complaint, and dismissed Exelon from the case with prejudice. In March 2016, Atlas IP filed an amended complaint against ComEd, which the court dismissed in May 2016, finding the complaint to be legally insufficient. The court awarded us reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs in July 2016. Atlas IP filed a notice of appeal in June 2016, seeking to appeal the dismissal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. In May 2017, the Federal Circuit affirmed the dismissal of this complaint.

We believe that we have meritorious defenses to Atlas IP’s allegations in each of these matters, and intend to continue vigorously defending the actions.

Acoustic Technology Patent Litigation. In July 2016, Acoustic Technology, Inc., a non-producing entity, filed suit in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division against us. The lawsuit alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,986,574, and 6,509,841 by certain meters and networking technology and services that we provide. The patents will expire in late 2017 and early 2018. We filed a motion to dismiss, as well as a motion to transfer the matter to the Northern District of California, in September 2016. The motion to transfer was granted in March 2017. Also in March 2017, we filed several petitions for inter partes review with the USPTO, requesting the USPTO to find certain claims of the Acoustic Patents to be unpatentable. We believe that we have meritorious defenses to Acoustic’s allegations and intend to vigorously defend ourselves.

In addition to the matters described above, from time to time we may be subject to other legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. We have received, and may in the future continue to receive, claims from third parties asserting infringement of their intellectual property rights. We may, from time to time, also be subject to various legal or government claims, disputes, or investigations. Such matters may include, but not be limited to, claims, disputes, or investigations related to warranty, refund, breach of contract, employment, intellectual property, government regulation, compliance or other matters. Future litigation may be necessary to defend ourselves and our customers by determining the scope, enforceability and validity of third-party rights or to establish our rights. There can be no assurance with respect to the outcome of any current or future litigation brought against us or pursuant to which we have indemnification obligations and the outcome could have a material adverse impact on our business, operating results and financial condition.

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2017, we have not recorded any amounts for contingent losses associated with the matters described above based on our belief that losses, while reasonably possible, are not probable. Unless otherwise stated, we are currently unable to predict the final outcome of these lawsuits and therefore cannot determine the likelihood of loss nor estimate a range of possible loss.

We are directly involved with various unresolved legal actions and claims, and are indirectly involved with proceedings by administrative bodies such as public utility commissions, arising in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that any liability from any reasonably foreseeable disposition of such legal actions and claims, individually or in the aggregate, would have a material effect on our consolidated financial statements. There are many uncertainties associated with any litigation or claim, and we cannot be certain that these actions or other third-party claims will be resolved without costly litigation, fines and/or substantial settlement payments. If that occurs, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. If information becomes available that causes us to determine that a loss in any of our pending litigation matters, claims or settlements is probable, and a reasonable estimate of the loss associated with such events can be made, we will record the estimated loss at that time.

Customer Performance and Other Commitments

Certain customer agreements require us to obtain letters of credit or surety bonds in support of our obligations under such arrangements. These letters of credit or surety bonds typically provide a guarantee to the customer for future performance, which usually covers the deployment phase of a contract and may on occasion cover the operations and maintenance phase of service contracts.

As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had a total of $15.7 million and $17.2 million, respectively, of standby letters of credit issued under a credit facility with a financial institution. As of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, $0.5 million (AUD $0.6 million) and $4.6 million (AUD $6.1 million) of these standby letters of credit were denominated in Australian dollars, respectively, and $3.3 million (AED 12.4 million) and $4.5 million (AED 16.4 million) of these standby letters of credit were denominated in United Arab Emirates Dirham, respectively. In accordance with the terms of our credit facility, fluctuations in the exchange rate will increase or decrease the amount available to us under the credit facility.

On December 18, 2015, we entered into a senior secured credit facilities credit agreement, or Credit Facility, with Silicon Valley Bank and HSBC, which provides a revolving loan facility in an aggregate amount not to exceed $75.0 million, with an available letter of credit sub-facility in the aggregate amount of $75.0 million and an available swingline sub-facility in the aggregate amount of $5.0 million. As of June 30, 2017, there were no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility; however, this line of credit is backing $15.7 million of letters of credit, leaving $59.3 million of available capacity for cash borrowings or additional letters of credit or swingline loan, subject to compliance with financial covenants and other customary conditions to borrowings, which varies at each period end. As of June 30, 2017, we were in compliance with the financial covenants in the credit agreement.

SILVER SPRING NETWORKS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

~~settlements~~As isof ~~probable~~June 30, ~~and~~2017, we had a ~~reasonable~~$16.8 ~~estimate~~million ofunsecured ~~the~~surety ~~loss~~bond. ~~associated~~The ~~with~~surety bond provides a financial guarantee to support performance obligations under certain customer agreements. In the event any such ~~events~~letters ~~can~~of becredit ~~made~~or surety bonds are called, we ~~will~~would ~~record~~be obligated to reimburse the ~~estimated~~issuer ~~loss~~of atthe ~~that~~letters ~~time~~of credit or surety bond. We do not believe there will be any claims against currently outstanding letters of credit or surety bonds.

Customer Performance and Other Commitments

As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had a total of $12.0 million and $17.2 million, respectively, of standby letters of credit issued under a credit facility with a financial institution. As of March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, $0.5 million (AUD $0.6 million) and $4.6 million (AUD $6.1 million) of these standby letters of credit were denominated in Australian dollars, respectively, and $3.4 million (AED 12.4 million) and $4.5 million (AED 16.4 million) of these standby letters of credit were denominated in United Arab Emirates Dirham, respectively.

In accordance with the terms of our credit facility, increases or decreases in the exchange rate between the Australian dollar and the U.S. dollar will increase or decrease the amount available to us under the credit facility. On December 18, 2015, we entered into a senior secured credit facilities credit agreement, or Credit Facility, with Silicon Valley Bank and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, or HSBC, which provides a revolving loan facility in an aggregate amount not to exceed $75.0 million, with an available letter of credit sub-facility in the aggregate amount of $75.0 million and an available swingline sub-facility in the aggregate amount of $5.0 million. As of March 31, 2017, there were no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility; however, this line of credit is backing $12.0 million of letters of credit, leaving $63.0 million of available capacity for cash borrowings or additional letters of credit or swingline loan, subject to compliance with financial covenants and other customary conditions to borrowings, which varies at each period end. As of March 31, 2017, we were in compliance with the financial covenants in the credit agreement.

As of March 31, 2017, we had a $20.3 million unsecured surety bond. The surety bond provides a financial guarantee to support performance obligations under certain customer agreements. In the event any such letters of credit or surety bonds are called, we would be obligated to reimburse the issuer of the letters of credit or surety bond. We do not believe there will be any claims against currently outstanding letters of credit or surety bonds.

Indemnification Commitments

Directors, Officers and Employees. In accordance with our bylaws and/or pursuant to indemnification agreements we have entered into with directors, officers and certain employees, we have indemnification obligations to our directors, officers and employees for claims brought against these persons arising out of certain events or occurrences while they are serving at our request in such a capacity. We maintain a director and officer liability insurance coverage to reduce our exposure to such obligations, and payments made under these agreements. To date, there have been no indemnification claims by these directors, officers and employees.

Customers and Third-Party Device Manufacturers. Refer to the discussion above under the heading Legal Contingencies for a description of our indemnification obligations.

Our contracts with customers and third-party device manufacturers typically provide indemnification for claims filed by third-parties alleging that our products and services sold to the customer or manufacturer infringe or misappropriate any patent, copyright, trademark or other intellectual property right.

In our customer contracts, we also typically provide an indemnification for third-party claims resulting from death, personal injury or property damage caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of our employees and agents in connection with the performance of certain contracts.

Under our customer and third-party device manufacturer indemnities, we typically agree to defend the utility customer or third-party device manufacturer, as the case may be, from such claims, and pay any resulting costs, damages and attorneys’ fees awarded against the indemnified party with respect to such claims, provided that (a) the indemnified party promptly notifies us in writing of the claim, (b) the indemnified party provides reasonable assistance to us at our expense, and (c) we have sole control of the defense and all related settlement negotiations.

Insurance. We maintain various insurance coverages, subject to policy limits, that enable us to recover a portion of any amounts paid by us in connection with our obligation to indemnify our customers and third-party device manufacturers. However, because our maximum liability associated with such indemnification obligations generally is not stated explicitly in the related agreements, and further because many states prohibit limitations of liability for such indemnified claims, the maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification provisions could significantly exceed insurance policy limits.

13. Restructuring

2017 Restructuring Plan

On March 10, 2017, we approved a restructuring plan, or the 2017 Restructuring Plan, designed to drive progress towards our long-term business model and to better align investments to our growth and key businesses, such as continued global expansion, Starfish, and other smart city and IoT initiatives.

The following table summarizes restructuring charges included in our condensed consolidated statements of operations (in thousands):

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016			2017		2016
Severance	$	1,207	$	—	$	1,254	$	—
Total restructuring	$	1,207	$	—	$	1,254	$	—

SILVER SPRING NETWORKS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

~~Insurance. We~~The ~~maintain~~following ~~various~~table ~~insurance~~summarizes ~~coverages,~~activities ~~subject to policy limits, that enable us to recover a portion of any amounts paid by us~~ in ~~connection with~~ our ~~obligation~~restructuring toaccrual ~~indemnify our customers and third-party device manufacturers. However, because our maximum liability associated with such indemnification obligations generally is not stated explicitly~~ (in the related agreements, and further because many states prohibit limitations of liability for such indemnified claims, the maximum potential amount of future payments we could be required to make under these indemnification provisions could significantly exceed insurance policy limits.thousands):

13. RESTRUCTURING

Fiscal 2017 Plan	Severance Costs			Facility-related and Other Costs		Total
December 31, 2016 (1)	$	—		$	—	$	—
Additions		1,254					1,254
Utilizations		(1,204	)		—		(1,204	)
June 30, 2017 (1)	$	50		$	—	$	50

(1) Included under accrued and other liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets

OnIn ~~March~~connection ~~10,~~with the 2017 Restructuring Plan, we ~~approved~~expect ~~a restructuring plan designed~~ to ~~drive~~record ~~progress~~aggregate ~~towards~~future ~~our~~charges ~~long-term~~of ~~model~~approximately ~~and~~$1.4 million to ~~better~~$2.2 ~~align~~million ~~investments~~in toseverance ~~our growth~~ and ~~key~~facility-related ~~businesses, such as continued global expansion, Starfish,~~ and other ~~smart~~associated ~~city~~costs ~~and~~over ~~IoT~~the ~~initiatives~~next fifteen months.

As a result of the restructuring, we expect to adjust worldwide headcount and incur certain facility-related expenses, and currently estimate that we will incur pre-tax charges of approximately $2.7 to $3.5 million. This consists of approximately $2.0 to $2.5 million in severance and other one-time termination benefits, and approximately $0.7 to $1.0 million in facility-related expenses and other associated costs. These charges are expected to be primarily cash-based and paid over the next eighteen months. We expect to record the majority of the charges in 2017, and expect the restructuring activities to be substantially complete by the second quarter of 2018. We incurred less than $0.1 million in severance costs as restructuring charges under this plan during the three months ended March 31, 2017.

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and with our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016. In addition, the following discussion contains forward-looking statements that are based on our management’s beliefs and assumptions and on information currently available to our management. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to these differences include those factors discussed below and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, particularly the section entitled “Risk Factors.”

Overview

We have more than a decade of experience creating, building and successfully deploying large scale networks and solutions enabling the Internet of Things, or IoT, for critical infrastructure. The IoT refers to a system where a diversity of physical devices has the capacity to communicate using internet technologies. Our first area of focus was in energy, creating a leading smart grid network platform by applying advanced networking technology and solutions to the power grid. We have broadened our focus beyond the smart grid to other utility networks including gas and water, and other critical infrastructure such as street lights, which enable smarter and more efficient cities, and additional industrial verticals which could benefit from our platform.

For the smart grid, we provide a leading networking platform and solutions that enable utilities to transform the power grid infrastructure into the smart grid. The smart grid intelligently connects millions of devices that generate, control, monitor and consume power, providing timely information and control to both utilities and consumers. We believe that the application of networking technology to the power grid has started to transform the energy industry through better communication just as the application of networking technology to the computing industry enabled the internet.

We believe the power grid is one of the most significant elements of contemporary industrial infrastructure that has yet to be extensively networked with modern technology. To address this challenge, we pioneered a fundamentally new approach to connect utilities with millions of devices on the power grid. We believe our technology has started to yield significant benefits to utilities, consumers and the environment, as the industry has started to realize the potential benefits of increased communication capabilities being deployed in the smart grid. These benefits include more efficient management of energy, improved grid reliability, capital and operational savings, integration with renewable-generation sources, consumer empowerment and assistance in complying with evolving regulatory mandates through reduced carbon emissions.

We intend to continue to innovate in order to advance our networking platform to support increased performance and a broader range of communications modules, including compact battery-operated solutions and advanced analytics capabilities. We believe this will enable a more powerful smart grid with support for more devices, applications and solutions. We believe these technological advances are also well-suited to provide intelligence to other devices within our core smart grid market, as well as adjacent markets for distribution systems to gas and water utilities.

We believe our technology is also well suited for a range of other solutions across the broader category of the IoT. We are focused on critical infrastructure within the IoT that requires similar networking performance asto our smart grid solution. Our first expansion beyond the power grid has been on city infrastructure, specifically networking street lights. We believe that by applying advanced networking technology, we can enable cities to achieve their goals for increasing energy and operating efficiency while improving quality of life. We have begun to expand our reach into an even broader range of IoT markets by working with new and existing customers to open their smart grid networks to third parties and support a wider range of devices, applications and solutions. To date, a substantial majority of our revenue and billings has been attributable to a limited number of customer deployments of our networking platform and advanced metering solution.

We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or JOBS Act. Under Section 107(b) of the JOBS act, emerging growth companies can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have irrevocably elected not to avail our company of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, we will be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies.

Recent Development in our Business

Organizational Restructuring

On March 10, 2017, we approved a restructuring plan designed to drive progress towards our long-term business model and to better align investments to our growth and key businesses, such as continued global expansion, Starfish, and other smart city and IoT initiatives. See Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements, Note 13, Restructuring, of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more information.

Key Non-GAAP and Other Financial Metrics

We supplement our results of operations presented in accordance with GAAP with certain non-GAAP metrics. We manage our business, make planning decisions, evaluate our performance and allocate resources by assessing non-GAAP and other financial metrics such as billings (including product billings, services billings, professional services billings, managed services and SaaS billings, advanced metering infrastructure billings, new solutions billings, and international billings), cost of billings (including product cost of billings and services cost of billings), non-GAAP operating expense and total backlog. We believe that these non-GAAP and other financial metrics, when taken together with the corresponding GAAP financial measures, offer valuable supplemental information regarding the performance of our business, and will help investors better understand the sales volumes and profitability trends, as well as the cash flow characteristics, of our business. The non-GAAP metrics should not be considered in isolation from, are not a substitute for, and do not purport to be an alternative to, revenue, cost of revenue, operating expense, or any other performance measure derived in accordance with GAAP. We may consider whether other significant non-recurring items that arise in the future should also be excluded in calculating the non-GAAP financial measures we use.

Billings

Billings represent amounts invoiced for products for which ownership, typically evidenced by title and risk of loss, has transferred or services that have been provided to the customer, and for which payment is expected to be made in accordance with normal payment terms. Billings exclude amounts for undelivered products, services to be performed in the future, and amounts paid or payable to customers. Billings are initially recorded as deferred revenue and are then recognized as revenue when all revenue recognition criteria have been met under our accounting policies. We reconcile revenue to billings by adding revenue to the change in deferred revenue in a given period. We use the following categories to further analyze and evaluate billings calculating and reconciling each metric as described above:

Product Billings

Product billings represent billings associated with hardware, such as communications modules, access points, relays, and bridges, and various types of software products used in our networking and data platforms, which have been delivered to the customer.

Services Billings

Services billings represent billings associated with services related to the initial deployment and ongoing operation of our networking platform and solutions that have been provided to the customer. This includes ~~professional~~managed services and SaaS billings and ~~managed~~professional services ~~& SaaS~~ billings.

Managed Services and SaaS Billings

Managed services and SaaS billings represent billings associated with managed services and SaaS offerings that have been provided to the customer.

Professional Services Billings

Professional services billings represent billings associated with professional services related to the deployment of our networking platform and solutions that have been provided to the customer.

Managed Services & SaaS Billings

Managed services & SaaS billings represent billings associated with managed services and SaaS offerings that have been provided to the customer.

Advanced Metering Infrastructure Billings

Advanced metering infrastructure billings represent billings associated with products and services for our advanced metering solutions.

New Solutions Billings

New solutions billings represent billings derived from our products and services beyond our advanced metering solution, such as distribution automation, demand side management, demand response, smart cities, street lights, and SilverLink Data Platform. New solutions billings represent incremental opportunities to deliver benefits into our customers’ deployed network or in some cases new stand-alone opportunities to deliver our new solutions.

International Billings

International billings represent billings for products and services that have been provided to customers outside of the United States.

Cost of Billings

Cost of billings represents the cost associated with products and services that have been delivered to the customer, excluding stock-based compensation and amortization of intangibles and acquisition-related charges. Cost of product shipments for which revenue is not recognized in the period incurred is recorded as deferred cost of revenue. Deferred cost of revenue is expensed in the statement of operations as cost of revenue when the corresponding revenue is recognized. Costs related to services are expensed in the period incurred. We reconcile cost of revenue to cost of billings by adding cost of revenue to the change in deferred cost of revenue, less stock-based compensation, amortization of intangibles, and acquisition-related charges included in cost of revenue, in a given period. We use the following categories to further analyze and evaluate cost of billings, calculating and reconciling each metric as described above:

Product Cost of Billings

Product cost of billings represents the cost associated with products that have been delivered to the customer.

Services Cost of Billings

Services cost of billings represents the cost associated with services that have been delivered to the customer. This includes professional services cost of billings and managed services &and SaaS cost of billings.

Non-GAAP Operating Expenses

Non-GAAP operating expenses consist of research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative expenses, excluding amortization and impairment of intangible assets, stock-based compensation, acquisition-related charges, restructuring and legal settlements.

Total Backlog

Total backlog represents future product and services billings that we expect to generate pursuant to contracts that we have entered into with our utility customers and meter manufacturers. Total backlog includes order backlog, which represents future billings for open purchase orders and other firm commitments.

The non-GAAP financial metrics set forth below for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017 and 2016 have been derived from our unaudited financial statements. Reconciliations to the comparable GAAP metrics are contained in the notes below.

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016			2017		2016
	(unaudited, in thousands)				(unaudited, in thousands)
Product revenue	$	26214,~~528~~713	$	3269,~~852~~917	$	241,241	$	102,769
Services revenue
Managed services and SaaS		1427,~~101~~350		1124,~~068~~570		41,451		35,638
Professional services		919,~~634~~509		427,~~700~~465		29,143		32,165
Total services revenue		2346,~~735~~859		1552,~~768~~035		70,594		67,803
Total revenue	$	50261,~~263~~572	$	48121,~~620~~952	$	311,835	$	170,572
Product billings(1)	$	4249,~~630~~642	$	4546,~~735~~113	$	92,272	$	91,848
Services billings(1)
Managed services and SaaS(1)		1516,~~903~~052		1214,~~888~~920		31,955		27,808
Professional services(1)		913,~~419~~055		10,~~291~~813		22,474		21,104
Total services billings(1)		2529,~~322~~107		2325,~~179~~733		54,429		48,912
Total billings(1)	$	6778,~~952~~749	$	6871,~~914~~846	$	146,701	$	140,760
Advanced metering infrastructure revenue	$	41254,~~072~~433	$	40105,~~514~~181	$	295,505	$	145,695
New solutions revenue		97,~~191~~139		816,~~106~~771		16,330		24,877
Total revenue	$	50261,~~263~~572	$	48121,~~620~~952	$	311,835	$	170,572
Advanced metering infrastructure billings (2)	$	5365,~~679~~849	$	5759,~~471~~997	$	119,528	$	117,468
New solutions billings(2)		1412,~~273~~900		11,~~443~~849		27,173		23,292
Total billings(2)	$	6778,~~952~~749	$	6871,~~914~~846	$	146,701	$	140,760
International revenue	$	3,~~932~~615	$	3,~~398~~413	$	7,547	$	6,811
International billings(2)	$	10,~~000~~035	$	1510,~~224~~973	$	20,035	$	26,197
Cost of product revenue	$	16186,~~027~~491	$	1541,~~980~~439	$	202,518	$	57,419
Cost of services revenue
Managed services and SaaS		9,~~841~~619		8,~~632~~900		19,460		17,532
Professional services		78,~~482~~924		7,~~011~~070		16,406		14,081
Total cost of services revenue		1718,~~323~~543		15,~~643~~970		35,866		31,613
Total cost of revenue	$	33205,~~350~~034	$	3157,~~623~~409	$	238,384	$	89,032
Cost of product billings(3)	$	2326,~~466~~362	$	2423,~~128~~837	$	49,828	$	47,964
Cost of services billings(3)
Managed services and SaaS(3)		98,~~163~~951		8,~~236~~294		18,114		16,531
Professional services(3)		68,~~802~~133		6,~~415~~686		14,935		13,101
Total cost of services billings(3)		1517,~~965~~084		14,~~651~~980		33,049		29,632
Total cost of billings(3)	$	3943,~~431~~446	$	38,~~779~~817	$	82,877	$	77,596
Research and development	$	1817,~~641~~272	$	1517,~~485~~933	$	35,913	$	33,418
Sales and marketing		98,~~103~~893		98,~~550~~622		17,996		18,172
General and administrative		1210,~~266~~881		1011,~~846~~239		23,147		22,085
Restructuring		471,207		39-		1,254		39
Total operating expenses	$	4038,~~057~~253	$	3537,~~920~~794	$	78,310	$	73,714
Research and development(4)	$	1615,~~537~~139	$	1315,~~149~~382	$	31,676	$	28,530
Sales and marketing(4)		8,~~482~~130		87,~~410~~658		16,612		16,069
General and administrative(4)		98,~~952~~553		78,~~997~~428		18,505		16,425
Restructuring(4)		—		—		—		—
Total non-GAAP operating expenses(4)	$	3431,~~971~~822	$	2931,~~556~~468	$	66,793	$	61,024

(1)	The following tables reconcile revenue to billings:

		Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
		Three Months Ended June 30, 2017							Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
		Revenue		Change in Deferred Revenue (a)			Billings		Revenue		Change in Deferred Revenue (a)			Billings
		(unaudited, in thousands)							(unaudited, in thousands)
Product		$	26214,~~528~~713	$	16(165,~~102~~071	)	$	4249,~~630~~642	$	241,241	$	(148,969	)	$	92,272
Services
Managed services and SaaS			1427,~~101~~350		1(11,~~802~~298	)		1516,~~903~~052		41,451		(9,496	)		31,955
Professional services			919,~~634~~509		(~~215~~6,454	)		913,~~419~~055		29,143		(6,669	)		22,474
Total services			2346,~~735~~859		1(17,~~587~~752	)		2529,~~322~~107		70,594		(16,165	)		54,429
Total revenue/billings		$	50261,~~263~~572	$	17(182,~~689~~823	)	$	6778,~~952~~749	$	311,835	$	(165,134	)	$	146,701
		Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
		Three Months Ended June 30, 2016							Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
		Revenue		Change in Deferred Revenue (a)			Billings		Revenue		Change in Deferred Revenue (a)			Billings
		(unaudited, in thousands)							(unaudited, in thousands)
Product		$	3269,~~852~~917	$	12(23,~~883~~804	)	$	4546,~~735~~113	$	102,769	$	(10,921	)	$	91,848
Services
Managed services and SaaS			1124,~~068~~570		1(9,~~820~~650	)		1214,~~888~~920		35,638		(7,830	)		27,808
Professional services			427,~~700~~465		5(16,~~591~~652	)		10,~~291~~813		32,165		(11,061	)		21,104
Total services			1552,~~768~~035		7(26,~~411~~302	)		2325,~~179~~733		67,803		(18,891	)		48,912
Total revenue/billings		$	48121,~~620~~952	$	20(50,~~294~~106	)	$	6871,~~914~~846	$	170,572	$	(29,812	)	$	140,760
	(a) Amounts presented net of foreign currency translation.

(2)	The following tables reconcile advanced metering infrastructure revenue to advanced metering infrastructure billings, new solutions revenue to new solutions billings, and international revenue to international billings:

		Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
		Three Months Ended June 30, 2017							Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
		Revenue		Change in Deferred Revenue (a)			Billings		Revenue		Change in Deferred Revenue (a)			Billings
		(unaudited, in thousands)							(unaudited, in thousands)
Advanced metering infrastructure		$	41254,~~072~~433	$	12(188,~~607~~584	)	$	5365,~~679~~849	$	295,505	$	(175,977	)	$	119,528
New solutions			97,~~191~~139		5,~~082~~761			1412,~~273~~900		16,330		10,843			27,173
Total revenue/billings		$	50261,~~263~~572	$	17(182,~~689~~823	)	$	6778,~~952~~749	$	311,835	$	(165,134	)	$	146,701
International		$	3,~~932~~615	$	6,~~068~~420		$	10,~~000~~035	$	7,547	$	12,488		$	20,035
		Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
		Three Months Ended June 30, 2016							Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
		Revenue		Change in Deferred Revenue (a)			Billings		Revenue		Change in Deferred Revenue (a)			Billings
		(unaudited, in thousands)							(unaudited, in thousands)
Advanced metering infrastructure		$	40105,~~514~~181	$	16(45,~~957~~184	)	$	5759,~~471~~997	$	145,695	$	(28,227	)	$	117,468
New solutions			816,~~106~~771		3(4,~~337~~922	)		11,~~443~~849		24,877		(1,585	)		23,292
Total revenue/billings		$	48121,~~620~~952	$	20(50,~~294~~106	)	$	6871,~~914~~846	$	170,572	$	(29,812	)	$	140,760
International		$	3,~~398~~413	$	117,~~826~~560		$	1510,~~224~~973	$	6,811	$	19,386		$	26,197
	(a) Amounts presented net of foreign currency translation.

(3)	The following tables reconcile cost of revenue to cost of billings:

		Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
		Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
		Cost of Revenue		Change in Deferred Cost of Revenue (a)			Stock-based Compensation			Amortization of Intangible Assets			Acquisition-Related Costs			Cost of Billings
		(unaudited, in thousands)
Cost of product		$	16186,~~027~~491	$	7(159,~~958~~588	)	$	(~~440~~461	)	$	(7980	)	$	—		$	2326,~~466~~362
Cost of services
Managed services and SaaS			9,~~841~~619		—			(~~690~~668	)		—			12—			98,~~163~~951
Professional services			78,~~482~~924		—			(~~676~~792	)		—			(41	)		68,~~802~~133
Total cost of services			1718,~~323~~543		—			(1,~~366~~460	)		—			81			1517,~~965~~084
Total cost of revenue/billings		$	33205,~~350~~034	$	7(159,~~958~~588	)	$	(1,~~806~~921	)	$	(7980	)	$	81		$	3943,~~431~~446
		Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
		Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
		Cost of Revenue		Change in Deferred Cost of Revenue (a)			Stock-based Compensation			Amortization of Intangible Assets			Acquisition-Related Costs			Cost of Billings
		(unaudited, in thousands)
Cost of product		$	15202,~~980~~518	$	8(151,~~668~~630	)	$	(~~351~~901	)	$	(~~169~~159	)	$	—		$	2449,~~128~~828
Cost of services
Managed services and SaaS			819,~~632~~460		—			(~~396~~1,358	)		—			—12			818,~~236~~114
Professional services			716,~~011~~406		—			(~~581~~1,468	)		—			(153	)		614,~~415~~935
Total cost of services			1535,~~643~~866		—			(~~977~~2,826	)		—			~~(15~~9	)		1433,~~651~~049
Total cost of revenue/billings		$	31238,~~623~~384	$	8(151,~~668~~630	)	$	(13,~~328~~727	)	$	(~~169~~159	)	$	~~(15~~9	)	$	3882,~~779~~877
		Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
		Cost of Revenue		Change in Deferred Cost of Revenue (a)			Stock-based Compensation			Amortization of Intangible Assets			Acquisition-Related Costs			Cost of Billings
		(unaudited, in thousands)
Cost of product		$	41,439	$	(16,992	)	$	(415	)	$	(195	)	$	—		$	23,837
Cost of services
Managed services and SaaS			8,900		—			(606	)		—			—			8,294
Professional services			7,070		—			(368	)		—			(16	)		6,686
Total cost of services			15,970		—			(974	)		—			(16	)		14,980
Total cost of revenue/billings		$	57,409	$	(16,992	)	$	(1,389	)	$	(195	)	$	(16	)	$	38,817
		Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
		Cost of Revenue		Change in Deferred Cost of Revenue (a)			Stock-based Compensation			Amortization of Intangible Assets			Acquisition-Related Costs			Cost of Billings
		(unaudited, in thousands)
Cost of product		$	57,419	$	(8,324	)	$	(767	)	$	(364	)	$	—		$	47,964
Cost of services
Managed services and SaaS			17,532		—			(1,001	)		—			—			16,531
Professional services			14,081		—			(949	)		—			(31	)		13,101
Total cost of services			31,613		—			(1,950	)		—			(31	)		29,632
Total cost of revenue/billings		$	89,032	$	(8,324	)	$	(2,717	)	$	(364	)	$	(31	)	$	77,596
	(a) Amounts presented net of foreign currency translation.

(4)	The following tables reconcile operating expenses to non-GAAP operating expenses:

		Three Months Ended March 31, 2017
		Three Months Ended June 30, 2017
		Operating Expenses		Stock-based Compensation			Amortization of Intangible Assets			Restructuring & Litigation			Acquisition-Related Costs			Non-GAAP Operating Expenses
		(unaudited, in thousands)
Research and development		$	1817,~~641~~272	$	(2,~~058~~134	)	$	—		$	—		$	~~(46~~1	)	$	1615,~~537~~139
Sales and marketing			98,~~103~~893		(~~506~~657	)		(~~106~~104	)		—			(92	)		8,~~482~~130
General and administrative			1210,~~266~~881		(2,~~287~~320	)		(8	)		—			~~(19~~—	)		98,~~952~~553
Restructuring			471,207		—			—			(471,207	)		—			—
Total operating expenses		$	4038,~~057~~253	$	(45,~~851~~111	)	$	(~~114~~112	)	$	(471,207	)	$	(741	)	$	3431,~~971~~822
		Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
		Six Months Ended June 30, 2017
		Operating Expenses		Stock-based Compensation			Amortization of Intangible Assets			Restructuring & Litigation			Acquisition-Related Costs			Non-GAAP Operating Expenses
		(unaudited, in thousands)
Research and development		$	1535,~~485~~913	$	(24,~~025~~192	)	$	—		$	—		$	(~~311~~45	)	$	1331,~~149~~676
Sales and marketing			917,~~550~~996		(~~831~~1,163	)		(~~244~~210	)		—			(6511	)		816,~~410~~612
General and administrative			1023,~~846~~147		(24,~~716~~607	)		(816	)		—			(~~125~~19	)		718,~~997~~505
Restructuring			1,254		—			—			(1,254	)		—			—
Total operating expenses		$	78,310	$	(9,962	)	$	(226	)	$	(1,254	)	$	(75	)	$	66,793
		Three Months Ended June 30, 2016
		Operating Expenses		Stock-based Compensation			Amortization of Intangible Assets			Restructuring & Litigation			Acquisition-Related Costs			Non-GAAP Operating Expenses
		(unaudited, in thousands)
Research and development		$	17,933	$	(2,241	)	$	—		$	—		$	(310	)	$	15,382
Sales and marketing			8,622		(726	)		(172	)		—			(66	)		7,658
General and administrative			11,239		(2,685	)		(8	)		—			(118	)		8,428
Restructuring			—		—			—			—			—			—
Total operating expenses		$	37,794	$	(5,652	)	$	(180	)	$	—		$	(494	)	$	31,468
		Six Months Ended June 30, 2016
		Operating Expenses		Stock-based Compensation			Amortization of Intangible Assets			Restructuring & Litigation			Acquisition-Related Costs			Non-GAAP Operating Expenses
		(unaudited, in thousands)
Research and development		$	33,418	$	(4,267	)	$	—		$	—		$	(621	)	$	28,530
Sales and marketing			18,172		(1,557	)		(415	)		—			(131	)		16,069
General and administrative			22,085		(5,400	)		(17	)		—			(243	)		16,425
Restructuring			39		—			—			(39	)		—			—
Total operating expenses		$	3573,~~920~~714	$	(511,~~572~~224	)	$	(~~252~~432	)	$	(39	)	$	(~~501~~995	)	$	2961,~~556~~024
	(a) Amounts presented net of foreign currency translation.

Non-GAAP metrics have limitations and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. The most significant of these limitations include:

•

our non-GAAP metrics do not reflect the effect of customer acceptance provisions as required under GAAP;

•

our non-GAAP metrics do not reflect the restructuring expenses as required under GAAP;

•

our non-GAAP metrics do not reflect the effect of contingent revenue recognition limits due to potential refunds and penalty provisions related to future delivery or performance as required under GAAP;

2829

•

our non-GAAP metrics do not reflect the impact of issuing stock-based compensation to our management team and employees;

•

our non-GAAP metrics do not reflect the impact of the amortization of intangibles assets acquired in connection with acquisitions and acquisitions-related charges;

•

our non-GAAP metrics do not reflect the impact of the impairment of intangibles assets acquired in connection with acquisitions;

•

our non-GAAP metrics do not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs; and

•

other companies, including companies in our industry, may not use such metrics, may calculate non-GAAP metrics differently or may use other financial metrics to evaluate their performance, all of which reduce the usefulness of our non-GAAP metrics as comparative metrics.

Key Elements of Operating and Financial Performance

We monitor the key elements of our operating and financial performance set forth below to help us evaluate growth trends, determine investment priorities, establish budgets, measure the effectiveness of our sales efforts and assess operational efficiencies. These key elements of operating and financial performance include financial metrics presented in accordance with GAAP as well as non-GAAP metrics which consist of billings (including product billings, services billings, professional services billings, managed services and SaaS billings, advanced metering infrastructure billings, new solutions billings and international billings), cost of billings (including product cost of billings and services cost of billings), non-GAAP operating expenses and total backlog. For more information regarding our use of non-GAAP metrics, see Key Non-GAAP and Other Financial Metrics above.

Revenue

We derive revenue from sales of products and services that enable customers to deploy our networking platform. For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017, product revenue represented 5382% and ~~services revenue represented 47~~77% of our total revenue~~. For the three months ended March 31~~, ~~2017~~respectively, weand ~~delivered~~services ~~approximately~~revenue ~~511,000~~represented ~~endpoints.~~18% Weand ~~have~~23% ~~delivered~~of ~~approximately~~our ~~26.0~~total ~~million cumulative endpoints from inception to March 31~~revenue, ~~2017~~respectively.

Our product revenue is derived from sales of hardware such as communications modules, access points, relays and bridges, and various types of software related to our solutions. To date, in our typical customer deployments, we have sold our communications modules to third-party device manufacturers and our other hardware and software products directly to our customers. In such sales of communications modules to third-party device manufacturers, we only record revenue related to the communications modules pursuant to a contractual relationship between us and the third-party device manufacturer. However, in some cases, we have sold third-party devices such as meters integrated with our communications modules directly to our customers. In those circumstances where we sell third-party devices directly to our customers, we recognize the sale on a gross basis as we are acting as principal. Whether our customer purchases the third-party device from us or the third party device manufacturer is dependent on the nature and extent of the business relationship our customer has with the third-party device manufacturer and how our customer prefers to manage their deployment.

~~Our~~Advanced ~~services~~metering infrastructure revenue includes ~~fees~~hardware ~~for~~and ~~managed~~software products along with services ~~and~~primarily ~~SaaS,~~related ~~and~~to ~~professional~~deployment ~~services.~~of ~~For~~the network canopy through our access points and the ~~three~~shipment ~~months~~of ~~ended~~our ~~March 31,~~communications ~~2017,~~modules ~~revenue~~which ~~from~~are ~~managed~~integrated ~~services~~into ~~and~~third-party ~~SaaS~~meters ~~represented~~for ~~28%~~deployment ofto homes and businesses supported by our ~~total~~customer base. New solutions revenue, ~~and~~includes revenue derived from ~~professional~~our ~~services~~products ~~represented~~and ~~19%~~services ofbeyond our ~~total~~advanced ~~revenue~~metering infrastructure, such as distribution automation, demand side management, demand response, smart cities, street lights, and SilverLink Data Platform.

For the three months ended March 31, 2017, our advanced metering infrastructure represented 82% of total revenue and our new solutions represented 18% of total revenue. Advanced metering infrastructure revenue includes hardware and software products along with services primarily related to deployment of the network canopy through our access points and the shipment of our communications modules which are integrated into third-party meters for deployment to homes and businesses supported by our customer base. New solutions revenue includes revenue derived from our products and services beyond our advanced metering infrastructure, such as distribution automation, demand side management, demand response, smart cities, street lights, and SilverLink Data Platform.

To date, a substantial majority of our total revenue is attributable to a limited number of customer deployments of our advanced metering infrastructure. In the three months ended March 31, 2017, the deployments for PG&E, ComEd, CPS Energy or CPS, American Electric Power Service Corporation or AEP, and FP&L, represented 17%, 14%, 13%, 11% and 10% of our total revenue, respectively.

Each of these total revenue percentages includes amounts related to the customers’ deployments that were invoiced directly to our third-party device manufacturers, as well as direct revenue from our customers. We expect that a limited number of customers will continue to account for a substantial portion of our total revenue in future periods although these customers have varied and are likely to vary from period to period.

Billings

For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017, product billings represented 63% and ~~services billings represented 37~~63% of our total billings., ~~Our~~respectively, and services billings ~~include~~represented ~~billings~~37% ~~from~~and ~~managed~~37% ~~services~~of ~~and~~our ~~SaaS~~total billings, ~~and professional services~~respectively. For the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017, ~~billings~~we ~~from~~delivered ~~managed~~approximately ~~services~~670,000 and ~~SaaS~~1,181,000 ~~represented~~endpoints, ~~23%~~respectively. ~~and~~We ~~professional~~have ~~services~~delivered ~~represented~~approximately ~~14%~~26.7 ofmillion ~~our~~cumulative ~~total~~endpoints ~~billings~~from inception to June 30, 2017.

~~For~~Customer ~~the three months ended March 31, 2017, billings from our advanced metering infrastructure represented 79% and new solutions represented 21% of our total billings.~~ Concentration

To date, a substantial portion of our total revenue and billings are attributable to a limited number of customer deployments of our advanced metering infrastructure. ~~In the three months ended March 31, 2017, the deployments for Consolidated Edison Company or ConEd, ComEd and FP&L, represented 13%, 11% and 10% of total billings, respectively.~~ We expect that a limited number of customers will continue to account for a substantial portion of our total revenue and billings in future periods although these customers have varied and are likely to vary from period to period.

Each of these total billings percentages includes amounts related to the customers’ deployments that were invoiced directly to our third-party device manufacturers, as well as direct invoices to our customers.30

Cost of Revenue

Product cost of revenue consists of contract manufacturing costs, including raw materials, component parts and associated freight, and normal yield loss in the period in which we recognize the related revenue. In addition, product cost of revenue includes compensation, benefits and stock-based compensation provided to our supply chain management personnel, and overhead and other direct costs, which are recognized in the period in which we recognize the related revenue. Further, we recognize certain costs, including logistics costs, manufacturing ramp-up costs, expenses for inventory obsolescence, warranty obligations, lower of cost or market adjustments to inventory, and amortization of intangibles, in the period in which they are incurred or can be reasonably estimated. We record a lower of cost or market adjustment in instances where the selling price of the products delivered or expected to be delivered is less than cost. We also include the cost of third-party devices in cost of revenue in instances when our customers contract with us directly for such devices. In accordance with our accounting policies, we recognize product cost of revenue in the periods we recognize the related revenue.

Services cost of revenue includes compensation and related costs for our services delivery, customer operations and customer support personnel, facilities and infrastructure cost and depreciation, and data center costs. In accordance with our accounting policies, we recognize services cost of revenue in the period in which it is incurred even though the associated services revenue may be required to be deferred.

Cost of Billings

Cost of billings represents the cost associated with products and services that have been delivered to the customer, excluding stock-based compensation and amortization of acquired intangibles and acquisition-related charges.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses consist of research and development, sales and marketing, and general and administrative expenses, as well as legal settlement expenses and restructuring charges. Personnel-related expenses represent a significant component of our operating expenses. Our regular full-time employee headcount decreased from 702 as of December 31, 2016 to ~~704~~646 as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2017.

Research and Development

We expense our research and development costs as they are incurred. Research and development expenses represent the largest component of our operating expenses and consists primarily of:

•

compensation, including salaries, bonuses, and benefits and stock-based compensation provided to our hardware and software engineering personnel, as well as facility costs and other related overhead;

•

cost of prototypes and test equipment relating to the development of new products and the enhancement of existing products; and

•

fees for design, testing, consulting, and other related services.

Sales and Marketing

Sales and marketing expenses consist primarily of:

•

compensation, including salaries, bonuses, and benefits, sales commissions and stock-based compensation provided to our sales, marketing and business development personnel, as well as facility costs and other related overhead;

•

marketing programs, including expenses associated with industry events and trade shows;

•

amortization of acquired intangibles; and

•

travel costs.

General and Administrative

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of:

•

compensation, including salaries, bonuses, and benefits and stock-based compensation provided to our executives, finance, legal, human resource and administrative personnel, as well as facility costs and other related overhead;

•

fees paid for professional services, including legal, tax and accounting services; and

•

legal settlement expenses.

Results of Operations and Key Non-GAAP Financial Metrics

The following table sets forth our consolidated results of operations for the periods ~~shown~~presented:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,												Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017 vs. 2016							2017			2016		2017 vs. 2016
	(unaudited, in thousands)						$ Change			% Change			(unaudited, in thousands)						$ Change			% Change
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:
Revenue	$	50261,~~263~~572		$	48121,~~620~~952		$	1139,~~643~~620			3114	%	$	311,835		$	170,572		$	141,263			83	%
Cost of revenue		33205,~~350~~034			3157,~~623~~409			1147,~~727~~625			5257	%		238,384			89,032			149,352			168	%
Gross profit		1656,~~913~~538			1664,~~997~~543			(848,005	)		(012	)%		73,451			81,540			(8,089	)		(10	)%
Operating expenses:
Research and development		1817,~~641~~272			1517,~~485~~933			~~3,156~~(661	)		20(4	)%		35,913			33,418			2,495			7	%
Sales and marketing		98,~~103~~893			98,~~550~~622			~~(447~~271	)		(53	)%		17,996			18,172			(176	)		(1	)%
General and administrative		1210,~~266~~881			1011,~~846~~239			~~1,420~~(358	)		13(3	)%		23,147			22,085			1,062			5	%
Restructuring		471,207			39—			81,207			21100	%		1,254			39			1,215			3115	%
Total operating expenses		4038,~~057~~253			3537,~~920~~794			~~4,137~~459			121	%		78,310			73,714			4,596			6	%
Operating loss		(23,144	)		(18,923	)		(4,221	)		22	%
Operating income (loss)		18,285			26,749			(8,464	)		(32	)%		(4,859	)		7,826			(12,685	)		(162	)%
Other income (expense), net		543			441			102			23	%
Other income, net		9			333			(324	)		(97	)%		552			774			(222	)		(29	)%
Loss before income taxes		(22,601	)		(18,482	)		(4,119	)		22	%
Income (loss) before income taxes		18,294			27,082			(8,788	)		(32	)%		(4,307	)		8,600			(12,907	)		(150	)%
Provision for income taxes		(570	)		(32	)		(538	)		1681	%
Benefit (provision) for income taxes		332			(961	)		1,293			(135	)%		(238	)		(993	)		755			(76	)%
Net loss	$	(23,171	)	$	(18,514	)	$	(4,657	)		25	%
Net income (loss)	$	18,626		$	26,121		$	(7,495	)		(29	)%	$	(4,545	)	$	7,607		$	(12,152	)		(160	)%

Revenue

The following table sets forth our revenue for the periods ~~shown~~presented:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,												Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017 vs. 2016							2017			2016		2017 vs. 2016
	(unaudited, in thousands)						$ Change			% Change			(unaudited, in thousands)						$ Change			% Change
Product revenue	$	26214,~~528~~713		$	3269,~~852~~917		$	(6144,~~324~~796	)		~~(19~~207	)%	$	241,241		$	102,769		$	138,472			135	%
Percent of revenue		52.8	%		67.6	%
Percentage of revenue		82.1	%		57.3	%								77.4	%		60.2	%
Services revenue
Managed services and SaaS		1427,~~101~~350			1124,~~068~~570			32,~~033~~780			2711	%		41,451			35,638			5,813			16	%
Professional services		919,~~634~~509			427,~~700~~465			4(7,~~934~~956	)		~~105~~(29	)%		29,143			32,165			(3,022	)		(9	)%
Total services revenue		2346,~~735~~859			1552,~~768~~035			7(5,~~967~~176	)		51(10	)%		70,594			67,803			2,791			4	%
Percent of revenue		47.2	%		32.4	%
Percentage of revenue		17.9	%		42.7	%								22.6	%		39.8	%
Revenue	$	50261,~~263~~572		$	48121,~~620~~952		$	1139,~~643~~620			3114	%	$	311,835		$	170,572		$	141,263			83	%

Total revenue recognized was ~~due~~based toon the receipt of customer acceptances ~~and~~as well as the performance of related services and the delivery of products for follow-on phases of deployment of our networking platform and solutions. Of our total revenue, revenue from our advanced metering infrastructure and new solutions represented 82% and 18%, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2017, and 83% and 17%, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2016.

~~For~~Of ~~the~~our ~~three~~total ~~months ended March 31~~revenue, ~~2017,~~revenue ~~the~~from ~~deployments~~our ~~for~~advanced ~~PG&E,~~metering ~~ComEd,~~infrastructure ~~CPS, AEP~~ and ~~FP&L,~~new solutions represented 1797%, ~~14%, 13%, 11%~~ and 103% ~~of our total revenue~~, respectively., ~~For~~for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, ~~2016~~2017, ~~the~~and ~~deployments~~86% ~~for ComEd, FP&L~~ and ~~AEP~~14%, ~~represented 49%~~respectively, ~~11%~~for ~~and~~the ~~10%~~three ofmonths ~~our~~ended ~~total revenue~~June 30, ~~respectively~~2016.

WeOf ~~anticipate~~our ~~that~~ total revenue, inrevenue ~~2017~~from ~~will~~our beadvanced ~~higher~~metering ~~than~~infrastructure ~~the~~and ~~levels~~new ~~achieved~~solutions inrepresented ~~2016,~~95% and ~~may~~5%, ~~fluctuate~~respectively, ~~from~~for ~~period~~the tosix ~~period~~months ~~throughout~~ended June 30, 2017, ~~primarily~~and ~~due~~85% toand ~~the~~15%, ~~timing~~respectively, offor ~~when we expect to meet~~ the ~~completion~~six ~~and~~months ~~acceptance~~ended ~~criteria~~June 30, ~~in our customer arrangements~~2016.

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, the deployments for Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, or BGE, represented 81% of our total revenue. For the three months ended June 30, 2016, the deployments for CPS Energy, or CPS, and Commonwealth Edison Company, or ComEd, represented 63% and 18% of our total revenue, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, the

deployments for BGE represented 68% of our total revenue. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the deployments for CPS and ComEd represented 45% and 27% of our total revenue, respectively. Each of these total revenue percentages includes amounts related to the customers’ deployments that were invoiced directly to our third-party device manufacturers, as well as direct revenue from our customers.

We anticipate that total revenue in 2017 will be higher than the levels achieved in 2016, and may fluctuate from period to period throughout 2017 primarily due to the timing of when we meet the completion and acceptance criteria in our customer arrangements.

Product Revenue

The ~~decrease~~increase in product revenue for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016, was primarily due to a decrease in the performance of follow-on phases of deployment of our networking platform and solutions from customers for which acceptance of initial phases of deployment was achieved prior to 2016, partially offset by an increase in the receipt of initial customer ~~acceptances~~acceptance from one customer.

The increase in product revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016, was primarily due to an increase in the receipt of initial customer acceptances, partially offset by a decrease in the performance of follow-on phases of deployment of our networking platform and solutions from customers for which acceptance of initial phases of deployment was achieved prior to 2016.

Services Revenue

The ~~increase~~decrease in services revenue for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016, was primarily ~~from~~due ~~professional~~to ~~services~~a ~~which~~lower ~~experienced~~level ~~an increase in the performance~~ of professional services ~~for~~delivered ~~follow-on phases of deployment of our networking platform~~ and ~~solutions~~accepted ~~from customers for which acceptance of initial phases of deployment was achieved prior to 2016, and from an increase~~ in the receipt of initial customer acceptances~~. During the three months ended March 31~~, ~~2017,~~partially ~~compared~~offset toby ~~the same period in 2016, we also experienced~~ an increase in managed services and SaaS revenue driven by an expanded footprint of cumulative endpoints delivered and accepted.

~~Our~~The increase in services revenue ~~from~~for ~~product,~~the ~~managed~~six ~~services~~months ~~and~~ended ~~SaaS~~June 30, ~~and~~2017, ~~professional~~as ~~services~~compared ~~represented~~to ~~53%,~~the ~~28%~~same ~~and~~period ~~19%,~~in ~~respectively~~2016, ofprimarily ~~our~~resulted ~~total~~from an increase in managed services and SaaS revenue ~~for~~driven ~~the~~by ~~three~~an ~~months~~expanded ~~ended~~footprint ~~March 31,~~of ~~2017,~~cumulative endpoints delivered and ~~68%~~accepted, ~~23%~~partially ~~and~~offset ~~9%,~~by ~~respectively,~~lower level of ~~our~~professional ~~total~~services ~~revenue~~delivered ~~for~~and accepted in the ~~three~~receipt ~~months~~of ~~ended~~initial ~~March 31,~~customer ~~2016~~acceptances.

32Our revenue from product, managed services and SaaS, and professional services represented 82%, 10% and 8%, respectively, of our total revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2017, and 57%, 20% and 23%, respectively, of our total revenue for the three months ended June 30, 2016.

Our revenue from product, managed services and SaaS, and professional services represented 77%, 14% and 9%, respectively, of our total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2017, and 60%, 21% and 19%, respectively, of our total revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Billings

The following table sets forth our billings for the periods ~~shown~~presented:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,										Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		2017 vs. 2016							2017		2016	2017 vs. 2016
	(unaudited, in thousands)				$ Change			% Change			(unaudited, in thousands)				$ Change		% Change
Product billings	$	4249,~~630~~642	$	4546,~~735~~113	$	(3,~~105~~529	)		(78	)%	$	92,272	$	91,848	$	424		0	%
Services billings
Managed services and SaaS		1516,~~903~~052		1214,~~888~~920		31,~~015~~132			238	%		31,955		27,808		4,147		15	%
Professional services		913,~~419~~055		10,~~291~~813		~~(872~~2,242	)		(821	)%		22,474		21,104		1,370		6	%
Total services billings		2529,~~322~~107		2325,~~179~~733		23,~~143~~374			913	%		54,429		48,912		5,517		11	%
Total billings	$	6778,~~952~~749	$	6871,~~914~~846	$	~~(962~~6,903	)		(110	)%	$	146,701	$	140,760	$	5,941		4	%

For the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017, billings from product and services represented 63% and 37% of our total billings, respectively, and for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2016, billings from product and services represented 6664% and 3436% of our total billings, respectively. We delivered approximately ~~511~~670,000 endpoints during the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017, as compared to approximately ~~698~~747,000 endpoints during the same period in 2016. The ~~decrease~~increase in product billings was primarily driven by ~~fewer endpoints delivered, which was partially offset by~~ an increase in ~~software~~shipments ~~billings.~~of ~~The~~products ~~increase~~with inhigher ~~service~~average ~~billings~~selling ~~was~~prices, ~~primarily~~offset ~~due~~by toa andecrease ~~increase~~ in ~~managed~~the ~~services~~number ~~and SaaS billings, driven by an expanded footprint~~ of ~~cumulative~~ endpoints ~~delivered~~shipped ~~and~~during ~~set up fees for new projects. Billings from international customers represented 15% and 22% of total billings in~~ the ~~three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively~~period.

Billings from our advanced metering infrastructure and new solutions represented 79% and 21%, respectively, of our total billings, for the three months ended March 31, 2017, and 83% and 17%, respectively, for the three months ended March 31, 2016.33

~~Billings~~The ~~from~~increase ~~product,~~in ~~managed~~service ~~services~~billings ~~and~~was ~~SaaS,~~primarily ~~and~~due ~~professional~~to ~~services~~ramp ~~represented~~up ~~63%,~~of ~~23%~~deployments ~~and~~from ~~14%, respectively, of~~ our ~~total~~customers. ~~billings,~~Billings ~~for~~from ~~the~~international ~~three~~customers ~~months~~represented ~~ended March 31, 2017, and 66~~13%, ~~19%~~ and 15%, ~~respectively,~~of ~~for~~total billings in the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

ToBillings ~~date,~~from ~~a substantial portion of~~ our ~~billings are attributable to a limited number of customer deployments of our~~ advanced metering infrastructure. ~~In the three months ended March 31, 2017, the deployments for ConEd, ComEd~~ and ~~FP&L,~~new solutions represented 1384%, ~~11%~~ and 1016%, respectively, of our total billings, ~~respectively.~~for In the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, ~~2016~~2017, ~~the~~and ~~deployments~~84% ~~for ComEd, AusNet Electricity Services Company~~ and ~~FP&L represented 36~~16%, ~~14%~~respectively, ~~and~~for ~~11%~~the ofthree ~~our~~months ~~total~~ended ~~billings~~June 30, ~~respectively~~2016.

Billings from product, managed services and SaaS, and professional services represented 63%, 20% and 17%, respectively, of our total billings, for the three months ended June 30, 2017, and 64%, 21% and 15%, respectively, for the three months ended June 30, 2016.

For the six months ended June 30, 2017, billings from product and services represented 63% and 37% of our total billings, respectively, and for the six months ended June 30, 2016, billings from product and services represented 65% and 35% of our total billings, respectively. We delivered approximately 1,181,000 endpoints during the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to approximately 1,445,000 endpoints during the same period in 2016. The slight increase in product billings was primarily driven by an increase in shipments of products with higher average selling prices, offset by a decrease in the number of endpoints shipped during the period. The increase in service billings was primarily due to ramp up of deployment from our customers. Billings from international customers represented 14% and 19% of total billings in the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Billings from our advanced metering infrastructure and new solutions represented 81% and 19%, respectively, of our total billings, for the six months ended June 30, 2017, and 83% and 17%, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Billings from product, managed services and SaaS, and professional services represented 63%, 22% and 15%, respectively, of our total billings, for the six months ended June 30, 2017, and 65%, 20% and 15%, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

For the three months ended June 30, 2017, the deployments for ComEd, Consolidated Edison Company, or ConEd, and CPS, represented 18%, 14% and 13% of our total billings, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2016, the deployments for ComEd, CPS and Florida Power and Light Company, or FP&L, represented 32%, 14% and 12% of our total billings, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, the deployments for ComEd, ConEd, CPS and FP&L, represented 15%, 13%, 11% and 10% of our total billings, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2016, the deployments for ComEd, FP&L, CPS and AusNet Electricity Services, Pty represented 34%, 11%, 10% and 10% of our total billings, respectively. Each of these total billings percentages includes amounts related to the customers’ deployments that were invoiced directly to our third-party device manufacturers, as well as direct invoices to our customers.

We anticipate that total billings will fluctuate from period to period throughout 2017, with modest growth as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016.

Cost of Revenue

The following table sets forth our cost of revenue for the periods ~~shown~~presented:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,									Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		2017 vs. 2016						2017		2016	2017 vs. 2016
	(unaudited, in thousands)				$ Change		% Change			(unaudited, in thousands)				$ Change		% Change
Cost of product revenue	$	16186,~~027~~491	$	1541,~~980~~439	$	47145,052		0350	%	$	202,518	$	57,419	$	145,099		253	%
Cost of services revenue
Managed services and SaaS		9,~~841~~619		8,~~632~~900		~~1,209~~719		148	%		19,460		17,532		1,928		11	%
Professional services		78,~~482~~924		7,~~011~~070		~~471~~1,854		726	%		16,406		14,081		2,325		17	%
Total cost of services revenue		1718,~~323~~543		15,~~643~~970		12,~~680~~573		1116	%		35,866		31,613		4,253		13	%
Total cost of revenue	$	33205,~~350~~034	$	3157,~~623~~409	$	1147,~~727~~625		5257	%	$	238,384	$	89,032	$	149,352		168	%

~~Product~~ Cost of Product Revenue. ~~Product~~Cost ~~cost~~ of product revenue increased for the three and six months ended ~~March 31~~June 30, 2017, ~~was~~as ~~relatively flat,~~ compared to the same ~~period~~periods in 2016., primarily due to the receipt of initial customer acceptance from one customer.

~~Services~~ Cost of Services Revenue. ~~The~~Overall ~~increase in services~~ cost of services revenue ~~for~~increased during the three months ended ~~March 31~~June 30, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016,. ~~was~~The ~~primarily due to an~~ increase in ~~managed~~cost ~~services~~of ~~and~~professional ~~SaaS~~services ~~cost~~revenue ofwas ~~revenue~~primarily driven by increases of $0.67 million in ~~customer-specific~~employee ~~project~~compensation ~~and~~due ~~equipment~~to ~~expenses~~higher headcount, $0.56 million in ~~employee~~third ~~compensation~~party ~~due~~installation tocosts ~~higher~~and ~~average~~$0.3 million in consulting expenses.

3334

~~compensation per headcount, and $0.2 million in facility and infrastructure costs due to our new San Jose headquarters.~~ The increase in ~~professional~~cost of managed services ~~cost~~and ofSaaS revenue was primarily driven by increases of $1.0.3 million in ~~employee~~consulting ~~compensation~~expenses ~~due to higher headcount,~~ and $0.2 million in ~~facility~~employee ~~and infrastructure costs from our new San Jose headquarters, partly offset by $0~~compensation.7 ~~million decrease in third party installation costs.~~

~~Changes~~Overall incost ~~our~~of services ~~cost~~revenue ofincreased ~~revenue~~during ~~are~~the ~~disproportionate~~six tomonths ~~changes~~ended inJune 30, ~~our~~2017 ~~services~~as ~~revenue~~compared ~~because~~to wethe ~~recognize~~same ~~services~~period ~~cost~~in of2016. ~~revenue~~The increase in ~~the~~cost ~~period~~of inprofessional ~~which~~services itrevenue iswas ~~incurred~~primarily ~~even~~driven ~~though~~by ~~the~~increases ~~associated~~of ~~services~~$1.7 ~~revenue~~million ~~may~~in beemployee ~~required~~compensation due to behigher ~~deferred~~headcount, asand ~~described~~$0.6 ~~under~~million ~~“Key~~in ~~Elements~~consulting ofexpenses. ~~Operating~~The ~~and~~increase ~~Financial~~in ~~Performance~~cost ~~– Cost~~ of ~~Revenue”~~managed ~~above.~~services Inand ~~addition,~~SaaS werevenue ~~may~~was ~~incur~~primarily ~~gross~~driven ~~losses~~by ~~primarily~~increases ~~due~~of to$0.8 ~~the~~million ~~timing~~in ofemployee ~~when~~compensation, we$0.6 ~~expect~~million toin ~~meet~~consulting ~~the~~expenses ~~completion~~ and ~~acceptance~~$0.4 ~~criteria~~million in ~~our~~ customer-specific ~~arrangements.~~project and equipment expenses.

Changes in our services cost of revenue are disproportionate to changes in our services revenue because we recognize services cost of revenue in the period in which it is incurred even though the associated services revenue may be required to be deferred, as described under “Key Elements of Operating and Financial Performance – Cost of Revenue” above. In addition, we may incur gross losses primarily due to the timing of when we meet the completion and acceptance criteria in our customer arrangements.

Cost of Billings

The following table sets forth our cost of billings for the periods ~~shown~~presented:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,										Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		2017 vs. 2016							2017		2016	2017 vs. 2016
	(unaudited, in thousands)				$ Change			% Change			(unaudited, in thousands)				$ Change		% Change
Cost of product billings	$	2326,~~466~~362	$	2423,~~128~~837	$	~~(662~~2,525	)		(311	)%	$	49,828	$	47,964	$	1,864		4	%
Cost of services billings
Managed services and SaaS		98,~~163~~951		8,~~236~~294		~~927~~657			118	%		18,114		16,531		1,583		10	%
Professional services		68,~~802~~133		6,~~415~~686		~~387~~1,447			622	%		14,935		13,101		1,834		14	%
Total cost of services billings		1517,~~965~~084		14,~~651~~980		12,~~314~~104			914	%		33,049		29,632		3,417		12	%
Total cost of billings	$	3943,~~431~~446	$	38,~~779~~817	$	~~652~~4,629			212	%	$	82,877	$	77,596	$	5,281		7	%

The overall cost of billings increased during the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016,. ~~due~~Cost ~~to a decrease in cost~~ of product billings, ~~offset~~increased inprimarily ~~part~~due byto an increase in average cost ofper ~~service billings. Cost of product billings decreased primarily due to fewer~~ endpoints ~~delivered~~shipped. ~~Cost~~The ~~of service billings increased primarily due to an~~ increase in ~~managed~~cost ~~services~~of ~~and~~professional ~~SaaS~~services ~~cost~~billings ofwas ~~billings~~primarily driven by anincreases ~~increase~~ of $0.6 million in ~~customer-specific~~third ~~project~~party ~~and~~installation ~~equipment expenses~~costs, ~~increase of~~ $0.3 million in employee compensation due to higher ~~average compensation per~~ headcount, and ~~from an increase of~~ $0.23 million in ~~facility~~consulting ~~and infrastructure costs from our new San Jose headquarters~~expenses. The increase in ~~professional~~cost of managed services ~~cost~~and ofSaaS billings was primarily driven by anincreases ~~increase~~ of $0.93 million in ~~employee~~consulting ~~compensation~~expenses ~~due to higher headcount,~~ and ~~from an increase of~~ $0.2 million in ~~facility~~employee ~~and infrastructure costs, partly offset by $0~~compensation.~~7 million decrease in third party installation costs.~~

The overall cost of billings increased during the six months ended June 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. Cost of product billings increased primarily due to an increase in average cost per endpoints shipped. The increase in cost of professional services billing was primarily driven by increases of $1.2 million in employee compensation due to higher headcount, and $0.6 million in consulting and other third party expenses. The increase in cost of managed services and SaaS billings was primarily driven by increases of $0.6 million in consulting expenses, $0.4 million in customer-specific project and equipment expenses, and $0.3 million in employee compensation.

Operating Expenses

The following table sets forth our operating expenses for the periods ~~shown~~presented:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,										Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017		2016		2017 vs. 2016							2017		2016	2017 vs. 2016
	(unaudited, in thousands)				$ Change			% Change			(unaudited, in thousands)				$ Change			% Change
Research and development	$	1817,~~641~~272	$	1517,~~485~~933	$	~~3,156~~(661	)		20(4	)%	$	35,913	$	33,418	$	2,495			7	%
Sales and marketing		98,~~103~~893		98,~~550~~622		~~(447~~271	)		(53	)%		17,996		18,172		(176	)		(1	)%
General and administrative		1210,~~266~~881		1011,~~846~~239		~~1,420~~(358	)		13(3	)%		23,147		22,085		1,062			5	%
Restructuring		471,207		39—		81,207			21100	%		1,254		39		1,215			3115	%
Operating expenses	$	4038,~~057~~253	$	3537,~~920~~794	$	~~4,137~~459			121	%	$	78,310	$	73,714	$	4,596			6	%

Operating expenses consist primarily of employee compensation, including salaries, commissions, bonuses, benefits and stock-based compensation, which fluctuate from period to period. We intend to continue to manage our operating expenses in line with our existing cash and available financial resources and anticipate continued spending in future periods in order to execute our long-term business plan. Facilities and information technology costs are allocated to each department based on usage and headcount.

existing cash and available financial resources and anticipate continued spending in future periods in order to execute our long-term business plan. Facilities and information technology costs are allocated to each department based on usage and headcount.

Research and Development. We focus the bulk of our research and development activities on the continued development of existing products and the development of new offerings for emerging market opportunities.

The ~~increase~~decrease in research and development expenses for the three months ended ~~March 31~~June 30, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016, was primarily driven by ana ~~increase~~decrease of $1.21 million in ~~employee~~engineering ~~compensation~~spending, ~~due~~offset toby ~~higher average compensation per headcount and from~~ an increase of $10.7 million inconsulting ~~outside services and engineering spending~~expenses.

34The increase in research and development expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016, was primarily driven by an increase of $1.3 million in outside services and engineering spending and an increase of $1.2 million in employee compensation.

We intend to continue to invest significantly in our research and development efforts, which we believe is essential to enhancing our competitive position and developing new products.

Sales and Marketing. We focus a significant proportion of our sales and marketing activities on new and emerging market opportunities.

Sales and marketing expenses for the ~~March 31,~~three ~~2017,~~and ~~compared~~six tomonths ~~the~~ended ~~same~~June ~~period in 2016~~30, 2017 remained relatively flat ~~but~~as ~~decreased~~compared ~~slightly primarily due~~ to athe ~~decrease~~same ofperiods ~~$1.2 million~~ in ~~commissions from a decline in new awards, offset in part by an increase of $0~~2016.~~7 million in outside service and consulting expenses.~~

General and Administrative. ~~The~~General ~~increase in general~~ and administrative expenses for the three months ended ~~March 31~~June 30, 2017, remained relatively flat as compared to the same period in 2016~~, was primarily driven by a $2~~.0 million increase in professional and external consulting costs, offset in part by reimbursement of $0.5 million in costs from the EON patent litigation described in Part II, Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

~~Restructuring. On~~The ~~March~~increase ~~10,~~in ~~2017,~~general ~~we approved a restructuring plan designed to drive progress towards our long-term model~~ and toadministrative ~~better~~expenses ~~align~~for ~~investments~~the tosix ~~our~~months ~~growth~~ended ~~and~~June ~~key~~30, ~~businesses~~2017, ~~such~~ as ~~continued~~compared ~~global~~to ~~expansion, Starfish, and other smart city and IoT initiatives. As a result of~~ the ~~restructuring,~~same weperiod ~~expect~~in ~~to adjust worldwide headcount and incur certain facility-related expenses~~2016, ~~and~~was ~~currently~~primarily ~~estimate~~driven ~~that~~by wea ~~will incur pre-tax charges of approximately~~ $2.70 ~~to $3.5~~ million. ~~This~~increase ~~consists~~in ofprofessional ~~approximately~~and ~~$2.0~~external toconsulting ~~$2.5~~costs, ~~million~~offset in ~~severance~~part ~~and~~by ~~other~~reimbursement ~~one-time~~of ~~termination benefits, and approximately~~ $0.75 ~~to $1.0~~ million in ~~facility-related expenses and other associated~~ costs. ~~These~~from ~~charges are expected to be primarily cash-based and paid over~~ the ~~next~~EON ~~eighteen~~patent ~~months.~~litigation ~~We expect to record the majority of the charges in 2017,~~ and ~~expect the restructuring activities to be substantially complete by the second quarter of 2018. We recorded less than~~ $0.14 million decrease in ~~severance~~employee ~~costs~~compensation asdue ~~restructuring~~to ~~charges~~lower ~~under~~stock ~~this~~compensation ~~plan during the three months ended March 31, 2017~~expense.

~~Other~~Restructuring. On ~~Income~~March ~~(Expense)~~10, ~~Net~~2017, we approved the 2017 Restructuring Plan designed to drive progress towards our long-term business model and to better align investments to our growth and key businesses, such as continued global expansion, Starfish, and other smart city and IoT initiatives. The increase in restructuring charges for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to the same periods in 2016, was due to the severance expenses incurred in connection with the 2017 Restructuring Plan. As a result of the restructuring, we expect to adjust worldwide headcount and incur certain facility-related expenses, and currently estimate that we will incur pre-tax charges of approximately $2.7 to $3.5 million, including approximately $2.0 to $2.5 million in severance and other one-time termination benefits, and approximately $0.7 to $1.0 million in facility-related expenses and other associated costs. These charges are expected to be primarily cash-based and paid over the next fifteen months. We expect the restructuring activities to be substantially completed by the second quarter of 2018.

Other ~~income (expense)~~Income, net, consists primarily of interest income on cash balances, foreign currency-related gains and losses, and interest expense on capital leases. We have historically invested our cash in money market accounts and fixed income securities. Net

~~The~~Other ~~increase in other~~ income ~~(expense)~~, net, ~~for~~consists ~~the~~primarily ~~three~~of ~~months~~interest ~~ended~~income ~~March 31~~on cash balances, ~~2017~~foreign currency-related gains and losses, ~~compared~~and tointerest ~~the~~expense ~~three~~on ~~months~~capital ~~ended~~leases. ~~March 31,~~We ~~2016,~~have ~~was~~historically ~~due~~invested toour ~~higher~~cash ~~foreign~~in ~~currency-related~~money ~~gain~~market funds and fixed income securities.

The decrease in other income, net, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, was primarily due to higher foreign currency-related loss.

Provision for Income Taxes

We estimate our annual effective tax rate at the end of each quarterly period, and we record the tax effect of certain discrete items, which are unusual or occur infrequently, in the interim period in which they occur. In addition, jurisdictions with a year-to-date loss where no tax benefit can be recognized are excluded from the estimated annual effective tax rate. A separate effective tax rate is calculated for the jurisdiction where we anticipate income tax expense but where an ordinary loss for the year is forecasted. The impact of such an exclusion and separate effective tax rate calculation could result in a higher or lower effective tax rate during a particular quarter depending on the mix and timing of actual earnings versus annual projections.

The provision for income taxes reported for the three months ended March 31, 2017 is based on our projected annual effective tax rate for 2017, and includes certain immaterial discrete items recorded during the period. Our income tax provision for the three months ended March 31, 2017 and 2016 reflects an effective tax rate of (2.5%) and (0.2%), respectively. Our income tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2017 primarily comprised of state taxes and foreign taxes associated with our foreign subsidiaries and foreign withholding taxes. We have not reported a provision for federal taxes in our consolidated financial statements since we project a taxable loss in the United States for 2017. Our state provision mainly arose from state minimum taxes. 36

The benefit for income taxes reported for the three months ended June 30, 2017 is based on our projected annual effective tax rate for 2017, and includes certain immaterial discrete items recorded during the period. Our income tax benefit and provision for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 reflects an effective tax rate of (1.8%) and 3.5%, respectively. Our income tax benefit for the three months ended June 30, 2017 primarily comprised of foreign taxes associated with our foreign subsidiaries. We have not reported a provision for federal taxes in our condensed consolidated financial statements since we project a taxable loss in the United States for 2017. Our provision for income taxes for the three months ended June 30, 2016 consisted primarily of state and foreign taxes.

For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, we recorded a provision for income taxes of $0.2 million and $1.0 million, respectively. Our income tax provision for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016 reflects an effective tax rate of (5.5%) and 11.5%, respectively.

We recognize deferred tax assets and liabilities for both the expected impact of the book-to-tax basis difference of our assets and liabilities, and for the expected future tax benefit to be derived from tax losses and tax credit carryforwards. We record a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets when it is considered more likely than not that all, or a portion, of our deferred tax assets will not be realized. We consider all available positive and negative evidence to estimate if sufficient future taxable income will be generated to utilize our existing deferred tax assets. A significant piece of objective negative evidence considered was the U.S. cumulative losses that we incurred over the years through 2013 and forecasted loss for 2017.

In 2016 and 2015, we reported U.S. pre-tax income of $22.9 million and $116.5 million, respectively. We, however, are forecasting a U.S. loss for 2017 which we consider significant negative evidence. We have not yet been able to establish a sustained level of profitability in the United States or other sufficient significant positive evidence to conclude that our U.S. deferred tax assets are more likely than not to be realized. Therefore, we continue to maintain a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets as of June 30, 2017. If, or when, the U.S. deferred tax assets are recognized, the tax benefits related to any reversal of the valuation allowance on our U.S. deferred tax assets will be accounted for as a reduction of our income tax expense. We have no material valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets with respect to foreign jurisdictions as of June 30, 2017.

March 31, 2017. If, or when, the U.S. deferred tax assets are recognized, the tax benefits related to any reversal of the valuation allowance on our U.S. deferred tax assets will be accounted for as a reduction of our income tax expense. We have no material valuation allowance against our net deferred tax assets with respect to foreign jurisdictions as of March 31, 2017.

In the ordinary course of our business, there are many transactions and calculations where the tax law and ultimate tax determination is uncertain. As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our income taxes in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate prior to the completion and filing of tax returns for such periods. This process requires estimating both our geographic mix of income and our uncertain tax positions in each jurisdiction where we operate. These estimates involve complex issues and require us to make judgments about the likely application of the tax law to our situation, as well as with respect to other matters, such as anticipating the positions that we will take on tax returns prior to our actually preparing the returns. In addition, changes in our business, including acquisitions, changes in our international corporate structure, changes in the geographic location of business functions or assets, changes in the geographic mix and amount of income, as well as changes in our valuation allowances, applicable accounting rules, applicable tax laws and regulations, rulings and interpretations thereof, developments in tax audit and other matters, and variations in the estimated and actual level of annual pre-tax income can affect the overall effective income tax rate.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2017, we had $4951.31 million in cash and cash equivalents and $6766.37 million in short-term investments. Our investment portfolio consisted of money market funds and fixed income securities. Our fixed income securities were denominated in U.S. dollars and consisted of highly liquid debt instruments of the U.S. government and its agencies and U.S. and foreign corporate debt securities. We limit the amount of our domestic and international investments with any single issuer and any single financial institution, and also monitor the diversity of the portfolio, thereby diversifying the credit risk. We believe our existing balances of cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments will be sufficient to satisfy our working capital needs, capital asset purchases, outstanding commitments, and other liquidity requirements associated with our existing operations through the next 12 months.

At ~~March 31~~June 30, 2017, our total cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments of $~~116~~117.68 million were held for general corporate purposes. We do not provide for federal income taxes on the undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, all of which we expect to reinvest outside of the United States indefinitely. However, if these funds were needed for our domestic operations, we would be required to accrue and pay insignificant U.S. state taxes on undistributed earnings of foreign subsidiaries. There are no other restrictions on the use of these funds. If we were to repatriate these earnings to the United States, any associated income tax liability would be insignificant.

We expect that operating expenses will constitute a material use of our cash balances. In the near term, we intend to continue to manage our operating expenses in line with our existing cash and available financial resources and anticipate increased spending in future periods in order to execute our long-term business plan. In addition, we may use cash to fund acquisitions or invest in other businesses, technologies or product lines. Our cash flows from operating activities have fluctuated since our inception, and we expect cash flows to fluctuate from period to period in 2017 and beyond. We believe that our available cash balances and credit facilities will be sufficient to meet our presently anticipated working capital, capital expenditure and business expansion requirements for at least the next 12 months. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our rate of customer wins and related billings and the expansion of our production capacity, as well as sales and marketing activities, timing and extent of spending on research and development efforts and the continuing market acceptance of our networking platform and solutions.

On December 18, 2015, we entered into a senior secured credit facilities credit agreement, or Credit Facility, with Silicon Valley Bank and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, or HSBC, which provides a revolving loan facility in an aggregate amount not to exceed $75 million with an available letter of credit sub-facility in the aggregate amount of $75 million and an available swingline sub-facility in the aggregate amount of $5 million. As of March 31, 2017, there were no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility; however, this line of credit is backing $12.0 million of letters of credit, leaving $63.0 million of available capacity for cash borrowings or additional letters of credit or swingline loan, subject to compliance with financial covenants and other customary conditions to borrowings, which varies at each period end. As of March 31, 2017, we were in compliance with the financial covenants in the Credit Facility.37

businesses, technologies or product lines. Our cash flows from operating activities have fluctuated since our inception, and we expect cash flows to fluctuate from period to period in 2017 and beyond. We believe that our available cash balances and credit facilities will be sufficient to meet our presently anticipated working capital, capital expenditure and business expansion requirements for at least the next 12 months. Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors, including our rate of customer wins and related billings and the expansion of our production capacity, as well as sales and marketing activities, timing and extent of spending on research and development efforts and the continuing market acceptance of our networking platform and solutions.

On December 18, 2015, we entered into a senior secured credit facilities credit agreement, or Credit Facility, with Silicon Valley Bank and HSBC Bank USA, National Association, or HSBC, which provides a revolving loan facility in an aggregate amount not to exceed $75 million with an available letter of credit sub-facility in the aggregate amount of $75 million and an available swingline sub-facility in the aggregate amount of $5 million. As of June 30, 2017, there were no borrowings outstanding under the Credit Facility; however, this line of credit is backing $15.7 million of letters of credit, leaving $59.3 million of available capacity for cash borrowings or additional letters of credit or swingline loan, subject to compliance with financial covenants and other customary conditions to borrowings, which varies at each period end. As of June 30, 2017, we were in compliance with the financial covenants in the Credit Facility.

Uses of Capital

We are occasionally required to provide performance bonds to secure our performance under customer contracts. Our ability to obtain such bonds primarily depends upon our capitalization, working capital, past performance, management expertise and reputation and external factors beyond our control, including the overall capacity of the surety market. Surety companies consider those factors in relation to the amount of our tangible net worth and other underwriting standards that may change from time to time. Surety companies may require that we collateralize a percentage of the bond with our cash. Events that affect surety markets generally may result in bonding becoming more difficult to obtain in the future, or being available only at a significantly greater cost. For example, in connection with prior patent infringement litigation, we were required to provide a surety bond that was later released by the district court in order to stay the execution of a judgment pending our appeal. In addition, some of our customers also require collateral in the form of letters of credit to secure performance or to fund possible damages as the result of an event of default under our contracts with them. If we enter into significant long-term agreements that require the issuance of letters of credit, our liquidity could be negatively impacted. Our inability to obtain adequate bonding or letters of credit and, as a result, to bid or enter into significant long-term agreements could have a material adverse effect on our future revenue and business prospects.

result in bonding becoming more difficult to obtain in the future, or being available only at a significantly greater cost. For example, in December 2014, we filed a surety bond in the amount of $17.6 million in connection with a notice of appeal that we filed with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. in our ongoing patent infringement litigation with EON. See Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements, Note 12, Commitments and Contingencies, of Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for more information. In addition, some of our customers also require collateral in the form of letters of credit to secure performance or to fund possible damages as the result of an event of default under our contracts with them. If we enter into significant long-term agreements that require the issuance of letters of credit, our liquidity could be negatively impacted. Our inability to obtain adequate bonding or letters of credit and, as a result, to bid or enter into significant long-term agreements could have a material adverse effect on our future revenue and business prospects.

Capital Expenditures

Our capital expenditures were $1.18 million and $417.52 million in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The ~~decreased~~decrease in capital expenditures for the six months ended June 30, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016, was primarily ~~related~~due to higher investment in our new ~~headquarters in~~ San Jose ~~that~~headquarters ~~was~~during ~~completed in~~ 2016. InWe ~~2017, we~~ expect capital expenditures to decrease in 2017 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2016. We will continue to use a portion of our cash for capital expenditures in the development of new products and services and expansion of our infrastructure, including servers and equipment related to managed services, SaaS, and other information systems required to support increased demand for our offerings and the related infrastructure.

Cash Flows

The following table sets forth the major sources and uses of cash for each of the periods set forth below:

	Three Months Ended March 31,
	Six Months Ended June 30,
	2017			2016			2017 vs. 2016
	(unaudited, in thousands)						$ Change			% Change
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	14,~~525~~533		$	37,~~730~~532		$	(2,~~205~~999	)		(5940	)%
Net cash used for investing activities		(~~577~~713	)		(23,~~091~~004	)		12,~~514~~291			(7276	)%
Net cash (used for) provided by financing activities	$	(2,000	)	$	1,410		$	(3,410	)		(242	)%
Net cash used for financing activities	$	(3,137	)	$	(1,677	)	$	(1,460	)		87	%

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Cash provided by operating activities decreased for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to ~~higher~~a change from net income for the six months ended June 30, 2016 to a net loss for the same period in 2017, offset by an increase in cash provided by working capital.

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Cash used for investing activities decreased during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to a $315.4 million decrease in purchases of leasehold improvements and furniture and fixtures related to the investment in our new San Jose headquarters ~~that was completed~~ in 2016. The remainder of the change related to the timing of purchases and maturities of available-for-sale investments.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Cash used for financing activities increased during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017, as compared to the same period in 2016, primarily due to a $4.2.3 million increase in payments for taxes related to the net share settlement of equity awards, offset in part by a $0.76 million increase in net proceeds from the issuance of common stock.

Concentration of Credit Risk

We typically extend credit to our customers and third-party device manufacturers and do not require collateral or other security in support of accounts receivable. We attempt to mitigate the credit risk in our trade receivables through our credit evaluation process and payment terms. We analyze the need to reserve for potential credit losses and record allowances for doubtful accounts when necessary. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2017, ~~PacifiCorp~~ComEd and ~~ComEd~~Aclara Meters LLC accounted for 1325% and 1011%, respectively, of our accounts receivable. As of ~~December~~June 3130, 2016, ComEd and ~~FP&L~~CPS accounted for 2539% and 1211%, respectively, of our accounts receivable.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, that would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements (as that term is defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K) or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.

During the ordinary course of business, we provide standby letters of credit or other guarantee instruments to third-parties as required for certain transactions initiated either by us or our subsidiaries. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2017, our condensed consolidated financial guarantees that were not recorded on our balance sheet consisted of $1215.07 million of standby letters of credit.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The following is a summary of our contractual obligations as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2017 (in thousands)

Payments Due by Period

Less than 1

1 to 3

3 to 5

More than 5

Contractual Obligations

Total

Year

Years

Operating lease obligations(1)

7270,~~411~~303

64,~~737~~513

16,~~864~~944

14,~~653~~681

34,~~157~~165

Purchase commitments(2)

2629,~~488~~323

—

Total

9899,~~899~~626

33,~~225~~836

16,~~864~~944

14,~~653~~681

34,~~157~~165

(1)	Consists of contractual obligations and non-cancelable office space under operating leases.

(2)	Consists of agreements or purchase orders to purchase goods or services that are enforceable and legally binding.

Our condensed consolidated balance sheet consists of other long-term liabilities which include gross unrecognized tax benefits, and related gross interest and penalties. At this time, we are unable to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the timing of payments in individual years in connection with these tax liabilities; therefore, such amounts are not included in the contractual obligation table above.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates that affect the amounts reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions are based on current facts, historical experience, and various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances to determine reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources.

An accounting policy is considered to be critical if the nature of the estimates or assumptions is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change, and the effect of the estimates and assumptions on financial condition or operating performance is material. The accounting policies we believe to reflect our more significant estimates, judgments and assumptions and are most critical to understanding and evaluating our reported financial results are as follows:

•

Revenue Recognition

•

Product Warranty

•

Deferred Cost of Revenue

•

Inventory Valuation

•

Stock-Based Compensation

•

Loss Contingencies

•

Income Taxes

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017, there were no significant changes to our critical accounting policies and estimates as compared to the critical accounting policies and estimates disclosed in Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, except for our adoption of Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, discussed in Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates, in Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Accounting, discussed in Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates, in Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2, Significant Accounting Policies and Estimates, in Part I, Item 1. Financial Statements, of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, for a full description of recent accounting pronouncements, including the actual and expected dates of adoption and estimated effects on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition, which is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Interest Rate Risk

Fixed Income Securities

Our exposure to changes in interest rates relates primarily to interest earned and market value of our cash equivalents and short-term fixed income securities.

Our fixed income investment portfolio is denominated in U.S. dollars and consists of various holdings, types, and maturities. Our primary objective for holding fixed income securities is to achieve an appropriate investment return consistent with preserving principal and managing risk. At any time, a sharp rise in interest rates or credit spreads could have a material adverse impact on the fair value of our fixed income investment portfolio. A sensitivity analysis is performed on our investment portfolio each quarter.

The following table presents the ~~hypothetical~~potential changes in the fair value of our short-term investment portfolio as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2017, arising from ~~potential~~hypothetical changes in interest rates. The modeling technique estimates the change in fair value from immediate hypothetical parallel shifts in the yield curve of plus or minus 50 basis points, or BPS, and 100 BPS.

(in thousands)

-100 BPS

-50 BPS

Fair Value ~~March~~June 3130, 2017

+50 BPS

+100 BPS

Total fixed income securities

7069,~~144~~396

69,~~763~~072

6968,~~380~~748

68,~~997~~423

68,~~613~~099

We monitor our interest rate and credit risk, including our credit exposures to specific rating categories and to individual issuers. There were no impairment charges on our cash equivalents and fixed income securities during the quarter. These instruments are not leveraged and we do not enter into speculative securities for trading purposes.

Interest rate risk also reflects our exposure to movements in interest rates associated with our Credit Facility. The interest bearing Credit Facility is denominated in U.S. dollars. The revolving loans and any swingline loans made pursuant to our Credit Facility bear interest at a rate per annum equal to (i) the higher of (a) the prime rate in effect on such day, and (b) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.5%, but in any case at a minimum rate of 0.0% per annum, plus (ii) 0.75%. As of March 31, 2017, we had not drawn on this Credit Facility.40

Interest rate risk also reflects our exposure to movements in interest rates associated with our Credit Facility. The interest bearing Credit Facility is denominated in U.S. dollars. The revolving loans and any swingline loans made pursuant to our Credit Facility bear interest at a rate per annum equal to (i) the higher of (a) the prime rate in effect on such day, and (b) the federal funds effective rate plus 0.5%, but in any case at a minimum rate of 0.0% per annum, plus (ii) 0.75%. As of June 30, 2017, we had not drawn on this Credit Facility.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk

Our sales contracts are denominated primarily in U.S. dollars and, to a lesser extent, Australian dollars, Euro and Brazilian real. Consequently, our customer billings denominated in foreign currencies are subject to foreign currency exchange risk. A portion of our operating expenses are incurred outside the United States and are denominated in foreign currencies, which are also subject to fluctuations due to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly changes in the Australian dollar, Euro and Brazilian real. Additionally, fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates may cause us to recognize transaction gains and losses in our statement of operations. To date, we have not entered into derivatives or hedging strategies as our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk has not been material to our historical operating results, but we may do so in the future if our exposure to foreign currency exchange risk should become more significant. There were no significant foreign exchange gains or losses in the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017, respectively.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

39Our management, with the participation of our CEO and CFO, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2017, and concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective, due to the material weakness in the design and operation of controls over our revenue process as initially disclosed in our Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 9, 2016.

required to be disclosed in our reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Disclosure controls and procedures are also designed to ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management, with the participation of our CEO and CFO, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2017. Based on the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of March 31, 2017, our CEO and CFO concluded that, as of such date, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective, due to the material weakness in the design and operation of controls over our revenue process as described below in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f) and Rule 15d-15(f). Our management, including our CEO and CFO, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Management’s assessment included evaluation of elements such as the design and operating effectiveness of key financial reporting controls, process documentation, accounting policies, and our overall control environment.

This quarterly Report on Form 10-Q does not include an attestation report of the company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to the rules of the SEC that permit emerging growth companies such as us to provide only management’s report in the quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

Based on our management’s assessment we concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2017 due to a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting related to revenue recognition, which was identified by our management in connection with our financial statement close process for the quarter ended September 30, 2016.

The design and operation of controls over our revenue process was inadequate due to insufficient processes to address complex computations in schedules supporting the determination of revenue and insufficient qualified personnel to review such schedules. Therefore, the review of underlying manually prepared schedules supporting the determination of revenue was neither extensive nor effective enough to identify errors.

We have performed additional analyses and procedures to enable management to conclude that, despite the existence of the material weakness discussed above, we believe the condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q present fairly, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations, comprehensive loss and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with U.S. GAAP.

Remediation plans

We are in the process of remediating this material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting, including implementing a number of measures designed to address the underlying causes of the above material weakness. Remediation efforts currently in process or expected to be implemented include the following:

•

Additional procedures to enhance the precision and accuracy of the controls over the review of our revenue recognition process, including underlying schedules supporting the determination of revenue;

•

Implementing revenue automation;

•

Hiring additional qualified personnel; and

•

Enhancing our review procedures by increasing the extent of review and implementing review checklists for important reconciliations.

We believe the foregoing efforts will effectively remediate this material weakness. We have developed a timetable for the implementation of the foregoing remediation efforts and will monitor the implementation. In addition, under the direction of the Audit Committee, we will continue to review and make necessary changes to the overall design of our internal control environment, as well as to policies and procedures to improve the overall effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. We believe that these additional procedures and personnel will enable us to broaden the scope and quality of our controls relating to the oversight and review of our financial statements. As we continue to evaluate and work to improve our internal control over financial reporting, our management may determine to take additional measures to address control deficiencies. However, this material weakness will not be considered remediated until the applicable remedial controls operate for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively.

Committee, we will continue to review and make necessary changes to the overall design of our internal control environment, as well as to policies and procedures to improve the overall effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting. We believe that these additional procedures and personnel will enable us to broaden the scope and quality of our controls relating to the oversight and review of our financial statements. As we continue to evaluate and work to improve our internal control over financial reporting, our management may determine to take additional measures to address control deficiencies. However, this material weakness will not be considered remediated until the applicable remedial controls operate for a sufficient period of time and management has concluded, through testing, that these controls are operating effectively.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Other than the changes noted above, we have made no changes to our internal control over financial reporting identified in management’s evaluation pursuant to Rules 13a-15(d) or 15d-15(d) of the Exchange Act during the ~~first~~second quarter of 2017 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls and Procedures

In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

~~EON~~Linex Patent Litigation. In ~~June~~March ~~2011~~2013, ~~EON~~Linex ~~Corp. IP Holdings~~Technologies, ~~LLC~~Inc., a non-producing entity, or ~~EON~~Linex, filed suit against us in United States District Court for the ~~Eastern~~Southern District of ~~Texas,~~Florida. ~~Tyler~~Linex ~~Division~~alleged ~~against~~that uscertain ~~and a number~~ of ~~smart~~our ~~grid~~networking ~~providers.~~technology ~~The~~infringes ~~lawsuit alleges infringement of~~ United States Patent Nos. 56,~~388~~493,~~101,~~377 ~~5,481,546,~~ and 57,~~592~~167,~~491,~~503. orWe ~~the~~filed ~~EON~~an ~~Patents,~~answer byin ~~certain~~May ~~networking technology and services that we and the other defendants provide~~2013. ~~Other~~In ~~defendants~~January ~~included Landis+Gyr AG~~2014, ~~Aclara~~the ~~Power-Line~~court ~~Systems~~granted ~~Inc.,~~the ~~Elster~~plaintiff’s ~~Solutions,~~request ~~LLC,~~for ~~Itron,~~a ~~Inc.~~stay ~~and Trilliant Networks Inc., all~~ of ~~which~~the ~~settled with EON prior to trial. We filed answers~~matter, ~~affirmative~~pending ~~defenses~~reexamination ~~and~~of ~~counterclaims denying~~ the ~~plaintiff’s~~patents ~~allegations~~at ~~and~~issue ~~asserting~~by ~~that~~ the ~~plaintiff’s patents are invalid~~USPTO. A ~~trial~~In ~~was~~September ~~held in June~~ 2014~~. After the trial~~, ~~the~~Linex ~~jury~~amended ~~determined that we had infringed~~ certain, ~~but~~patent ~~not all, of the~~ claims ~~under the EON Patents,~~ and ~~returned~~canceled acertain ~~verdict~~other ~~against~~patent usclaims inbased ~~the~~upon ~~amount of $18.8 million. Following post-trial motions by both parties,~~ the ~~court~~USPTO’s ~~reduced~~completed ~~the damage award to approximately $13.0 million~~reexaminations, and in ~~December~~October 2014, ~~entered~~the ~~a final judgment in that amount plus approximately $1.5 million in pre-judgment interest. The~~ court ~~subsequently~~lifted ~~revised~~ the ~~final~~stay ~~judgment to include additional costs~~ of ~~about~~the $0matter.2 In ~~million~~January ~~and~~2015, ~~entered~~Linex filed an amended ~~final~~complaint ~~judgment~~to inincorporate ~~December~~facts ~~2014.~~related ~~All~~to of the ~~EON~~completed ~~Patents~~reexaminations, ~~have expired~~ and ~~therefore~~we ~~EON~~filed isan ~~not~~answer ~~seeking,~~responding ~~and~~to ~~EON~~the ~~may~~complaint ~~not~~and ~~recover,~~raising ~~any~~ additional ~~sums~~defenses. In asJune ~~royalties~~2015, ~~for~~the ~~our sales of products going forward.~~

In December 2014, we filed a notice of appeal with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C. In order to stay the execution of the final judgment pending the appeal, in December 2014 we filed a surety bond in the amount of $17.6 million, which includes an additional 20% of the final judgment for post-judgment interest and expenses expected to be incurred during the appeal process, in accordance with court rules. The bond was issued by Zurich Insurance and is collateralized with a standby letter of credit in the amount of $13.0 million, the amount of the damage award. Upon completion of the appeal process, both the surety bond and standby letter of credit will be released. In January 2015, the District Court accepted the bond and entered the stay of execution of the judgment. The appellate hearing took place in November 2015, and in February 2016 the appellate court issued a ruling reversing the District Court’s prior decision and judgment against us, and holding that no reasonable jury could find we infringed the EON patents. In April 2016, EON filed a petition for a rehearing en banc, which the appellate court denied in May 2016. In June 2016, the appellate court notified the District Court that the prior judgment in favor of EON was vacated and that judgment was in our favor, and the District Court released our appellate bond obligation. In July 2016 the District Court awarded us $0.6 million in costs, which EON appealed in August 2016. EON also filed a petition for certiorari to the Supreme Court in October 2016, seeking review of the appellate court’s reversal of the District Court’s original judgment against us, which the Supreme Court denied in January 2017. In February 2017, we agreed with EON that it would pay us $0.5 million in settlement of the cost award, which we received in March 2017.42

~~Linex~~court ~~Patent~~stayed ~~Litigation. In~~the ~~March~~action ~~2013,~~pending ~~Linex Technologies, Inc., a non-producing entity, or Linex, filed suit against us in United States District Court for~~ the ~~Southern~~USPTO’s ~~District~~completion of ~~Florida.~~further ~~Linex~~ex ~~alleged~~parte ~~that~~reexaminations ~~certain~~ of ~~our~~the ~~networking~~patents ~~technology~~at ~~infringes United States Patent Nos~~issue. ~~6,493,377 and 7,167,503. We filed an answer in May 2013.~~ In ~~January~~July ~~2014~~2017, the ~~court~~USPTO ~~granted~~issued ~~the~~a ~~plaintiff’s~~reexamination ~~request~~certificate ~~for~~with aall ~~stay~~ of the ~~matter,~~claims ~~pending~~cancelled ~~reexamination~~for of the ~~patents~~‘377 atpatent. ~~issue~~We bybelieve ~~the~~that ~~USPTO.~~we Inhave ~~September~~meritorious ~~2014,~~defenses to Linex’s ~~amended~~allegations ~~certain patent claims~~ and ~~canceled~~intend ~~certain~~to ~~other~~continue ~~patent~~vigorously ~~claims~~defending ~~based~~against ~~upon~~ the ~~USPTO’s completed reexaminations, and in October~~ action.

2014, the court lifted the stay of the matter. In January 2015, Linex filed an amended complaint to incorporate facts related to the completed reexaminations, and we filed an answer responding to the complaint and raising additional defenses. In June 2015, the court stayed the action pending the USPTO’s completion of further ex parte reexaminations of the patents at issue. We believe that we have meritorious defenses to Linex’s allegations and intend to continue vigorously defending against the action.

Atlas/ComEd, Atlas/PG&E, and Atlas/FP&L Patent Litigation. In November 2015, Atlas IP, LLC filed separate suits against our customers ComEd and PG&E, alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 5,371,734 by communications between smart meters and access points over a neighborhood area network using wireless communication modules and networking equipment supplied by us. In May 2016, Atlas filed a similar suit against our customer Florida Power & Light Company, or FP&L. We have agreed to assume the defense in each of these suits.

PG&E. The suit against PG&E was filed in the Northern District of California in November 2015. We filed a motion to dismiss the PG&E complaint, which the court granted in March 2016. Atlas IP filed an amended complaint against PG&E, which the court dismissed in June 2016, determining that Atlas IP is collaterally estopped from re-litigating the sufficiency of its complaint as the sufficiency of Atlas IP’s complaint was already decided against Atlas IP by the court in the ComEd suit.

We believe that we have meritorious defenses to Atlas IP’s allegations in each of these matters, and intend to continue vigorously defending against the actions as required.

Acoustic Technology Patent Litigation. In July 2016, Acoustic Technology, Inc., a non-producing entity, filed suit in United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Marshall Division against us. The lawsuit alleges infringement of United States Patent Nos. 5,986,574, and 6,509,841, or the Acoustic Patents, by certain meters and networking technology and services that we provide. The patents will expire in late 2017 and early 2018. We filed a motion to dismiss, as well as a motion to transfer the matter to the Northern District of California, in September 2016. The motion to transfer was granted in March 2017. Also in March 2017, we filed several petitions for inter partes review with the USPTO, requesting the USPTO to find certain claims of the Acoustic Patents to be unpatentable. In July 2017, the court stayed the suit pending review of the petitions for inter partes review by the USPTO. We believe that we have meritorious defenses to Acoustic’s allegations and intend to vigorously defend ourselves.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Our business is subject to many risks and uncertainties, which may affect our future performance. If any of the events or circumstances described below occurs, our business and financial performance could be harmed, our actual results could differ materially from our expectations and the market value of our stock could decline. The risks and uncertainties discussed below are not the only ones we face. There may be additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently do not believe are material that may harm our business and financial performance.

4243

We have a prior history of operating losses and we may not sustain profitability on a quarterly or annual basis.

Prior to our year ended December 31, 2015, we incurred significant losses each year. We have an accumulated deficit of $~~671~~652.59 million as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2017. We experienced net losses of $21.6 million and $89.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2014, respectively, and achieved profitability for the first time with net income of $80.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. Our ability to be profitable for 2017 and beyond will depend on our ability to continue to increase our revenue, and maintain proportional expense levels. We may not achieve profitability again in 2017 or future periods and may incur negative operating cash flow in future periods, as we expect to incur significant costs to sell our products and operating expenses in connection with the continued development and expansion of our business. Our expenses include research and development expenses, general and administrative expenses, selling and marketing expenses, customer service and support expenses, and restructuring charges. OnSome ~~March 10, 2017, we approved a restructuring plan designed to drive progress towards our long-term model and to better align investments to our growth and key businesses. As a result~~ of ~~the restructuring, we expect to adjust worldwide headcount and incur certain facility-related expenses. We may not realize the cost savings expected from this restructuring. In addition, some of~~ our expenses relate to prospective customers that may never place any orders and products that may not be introduced or generate revenue until later periods, if at all. There can be no assurance that we will become profitable again on a quarterly or annual basis.

Our quarterly results are inherently unpredictable and subject to substantial fluctuations, and, as a result, we may fail to meet the expectations of securities analysts and investors, which could adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

Our revenue, billings and other operating results may vary significantly from quarter to quarter due to a number of factors, many of which are outside of our control. Our revenue and billings have fluctuated in recent periods, and have in the past decreased on a quarterly basis and on an annual basis. There can be no assurances that our revenue and billings will increase, or will not continue to decrease on a quarterly or annual basis. We expect revenue, billings, operating expenses and other operating results to fluctuate from period to period throughout 2017 and beyond. We also expect operating losses in certain future periods. See Part I, Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

The factors that may affect the unpredictability of our quarterly results and cause our stock price to fluctuate include, but are not limited to:

•

long, and sometimes unpredictable, sales and customer deployment cycles;

•

changes in the type and mix of products and services sold;

•

our dependence on a limited number of customers, as well as our ability to achieve scale in these deployments;

•

the timing of acceptance of our products and services by our customers, which can have a material impact on when we recognize related revenue under our revenue recognition policies;

•

delays in regulatory approvals for our customers and customer deployments;

•

changing market conditions;

•

competition;

•

failures of our products, components that we use in our products, or third-party devices containing our products that delay deployments, cause bodily injury, death or property damage, harm our reputation or result in high warranty costs, contractual penalties or terminations;

•

product or project failures by third-party vendors, customers or competitors that result in the cancellation, slowing down or deferring of projects;

•

liquidated damages provisions in our contracts, which could result in significant financial penalties if triggered or, even if not triggered, could affect our ability to recognize revenue in a given period;

•

the ability of our suppliers and manufacturers to deliver supplies and products to us on a timely basis;

•

delays associated with government funding programs for smart grid projects;

•

political and consumer sentiment and the related impact on the scope and timing of smart grid and smart city deployments; and

•

economic, regulatory and political conditions in the markets where we operate or anticipate operating.

As a result, we believe that quarter to quarter comparisons of operating results are not necessarily a good indication of what our future performance will be. In some future quarters our operating results may be below our expectations or the expectations of securities analysts or investors, in which case the price of our common stock may decline.

Sales cycles to our customers can be lengthy and unpredictable and require significant employee time and financial resources with no assurances that a prospective customer will select our products and services.

Sales cycles with our prospective customers, particularly to utilities, which are our primary set of prospective customers, tend to be long and unpredictable. Utilities generally have extensive budgeting, procurement, competitive bidding, technical and performance review, and regulatory approval processes that can take up to several years to complete. Utilities may choose, and many historically have often chosen, to follow industry trends rather than be early adopters of new products or services, which can extend the lead time for or prevent acceptance of more recently introduced products or services such as ours. In addition, in many instances, a utility may require one or more pilot programs to test new products and services before committing to a larger deployment. These pilot programs may be quite lengthy and further delay the sales cycle with no assurance that they will lead to a larger deployment or future sales. Furthermore, to the extent our products are required to be deployed with the products of others, such as meters, delays related to such third-party products will further lengthen the sales cycle.

This extended sales process requires us to dedicate significant time by our senior management, sales and marketing personnel and customer services personnel, and to use significant financial resources without any assurance of success or recovery of our related expenses. Similarly, we are likely to incur these significant operating expenses well ahead of recognizing the related revenue because our ability to recognize revenue is typically dependent on meeting contractual customer acceptance and other requirements.

The lengthy sales cycles of our products and services also make it difficult to forecast new customer deployments, as well as the volume and timing of orders, which in turn makes forecasting our future results of operations challenging. In the event that we publicly disclose any forecasts of our future results of operations or other performance metrics and those forecasts ultimately turn out to be inaccurate, the value of our common stock could significantly decline.

Our revenue is not predictable and recognition of a significant portion of it ~~will~~could be deferred into future periods.

Once a customer decides to move forward with a large-scale deployment of our products and services, the timing of and our ability to recognize related revenue will depend on several factors, some of which may not be under our control. These factors include shipment schedules that may be delayed or subject to modification, the rate at which our customers choose to deploy our solutions, customer acceptance of all or any part of our products and services, our contractual commitments to provide new or enhanced functionality at some point in the future, other contractual provisions such as liquidated damages, our manufacturers’ ability to provide an adequate supply of components, our customers’ requirement to obtain regulatory approval, and our ability to deliver quality products according to expected schedules. In light of these factors, the application of complex revenue recognition rules to our products and services has required us to defer, and in the future could continue to require us to defer, a significant amount of revenue until undetermined future periods. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2017 and December 31, 2016, we had $~~403~~220.20 million and $385.4 million in deferred revenue, respectively. It may be difficult to predict the amount of revenue that we will recognize in any given period, and amounts recognized may fluctuate significantly from one period to the next.

Amounts included in our total backlog and order backlog may not result in actual ~~billings~~revenue or ~~revenue~~billings or translate into profits.

Our total backlog represents future product and services revenue and billings that we expect to generate pursuant to contracts that we have entered into with our customers and third-party device manufacturers. Order backlog represents future revenue and billings for open purchase orders and other firm commitments and is included in our total backlog. We anticipate that our total backlog and order backlog will fluctuate from period to period throughout 2017 and beyond.

We cannot guarantee that our total backlog or order backlog will result in actual billings or revenue in the originally anticipated period, or at all. In addition, the contracts reflected in our total backlog and order backlog may not generate margins equal to or better than our historical operating results. We have a short history of tracking total backlog and order backlog on a consistent basis as performance measures, and as a result, we do not have significant experience in determining the level of realization that we will actually achieve on our total backlog and order backlog. Our customer contracts are typically structured as master purchase and services agreements, or MSAs, under which the customer may place purchase orders over the course of a deployment. These deployments can extend for a number of years. Because our MSAs do not typically require a customer to purchase a minimum amount of product or services, total backlog is an estimate based upon contractual terms, existing purchase orders and other available information regarding the amount and timing of expected future purchase orders to be placed by our customers, including non-binding forecasts. No assurance can be made that firm purchase orders will be placed under these MSAs in the amounts we estimate, within the time period we expect, or at all. Total backlog is subject to adjustments due to the long-term nature of our customer deployments. Adjustments can result from a variety of factors, including changes in the nature or scope of customer deployments, the impact of contingency provisions related to future delivery or performance, customer cancellations, market conditions, delayed regulatory approvals and customer defaults. Delays due to external market factors or delays in deployments and required regulatory approvals have in the past and may in the future cause us to extend the deployment schedule or make modifications under customer contracts. In

4445

Adjustments can result from a variety of factors, including changes in the nature or scope of customer deployments, the impact of contingency provisions related to future delivery or performance, customer cancellations, market conditions, delayed regulatory approvals and customer defaults. Delays due to external market factors or delays in deployments and required regulatory approvals have in the past and may in the future cause us to extend the deployment schedule or make modifications under customer contracts. In addition, under our MSAs, our customers generally have the right to terminate the MSA for any reason, including for their sole convenience, a material breach or insolvency on our part or their inability to obtain required regulatory approval. The occurrence of such adjustments or terminations could materially reduce the amount of, or delay the fulfillment of, our total backlog and order backlog. If our total backlog or order backlog fails to materialize as expected, we could experience a material reduction in future billings, revenue, operating results or cash flow.

We are dependent on the utility industry, which has experienced volatility in capital spending. This volatility could cause our results of operations to vary significantly from period to period.

We derive a substantial portion of our revenue and billings from sales of products and services directly and indirectly to utilities. Similar to other industries, the utility industry has been affected by recent economic factors, including continued global economic uncertainty. Purchases of our products and services may be reduced or deferred as a result of many factors including economic downturns and uncertainty, slowdowns in new residential and commercial construction, a utility’s access to capital on acceptable terms, the timing and availability of government grants or incentives, utility specific financial circumstances, mergers and acquisitions, regulatory decisions, weather conditions, consumer opposition and fluctuating interest rates. Even with economic recovery, it may take time for our customers to establish new budgets and return to normal purchasing patterns. We cannot predict the recurrence of any economic slowdown or the strength or sustainability of the economic recovery, worldwide, in the United States or in our industry. We have experienced, and may in the future experience, variability in operating results on an annual and a quarterly basis as a result of these factors. Because a significant portion of our expenses is fixed in the short term or is incurred in advance of anticipated sales, we may not be able to decrease our expenses in a timely manner to offset any shortfall of sales. This could materially and adversely affect our operating results, financial condition and cash flows.

Substantially all of our current products depend on the availability and are subject to the regulation of radio spectrum in the United States and abroad.

Substantially all of our current products are designed to communicate wirelessly via radio frequencies and therefore depend on the availability of adequate radio spectrum in order to operate. While these products are designed to operate in a variety of different frequencies to allow us to adapt our solutions to local market conditions, or by using other technologies such as cellular, in the United States they are primarily designed to form a wireless RF mesh using the unlicensed 902-928 megahertz, or MHz, band. The 902-928 MHz band is available for a wide variety of uses and requires us to manage interference by other users who operate in accordance with the Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, rules. The unlicensed frequencies are also often the subject of proposals to the FCC requesting a change in the rules under which such frequencies may be used. In the past, the FCC has re-allocated spectrum for new or additional uses, and has adopted changes to the requirements for equipment using radio spectrum. It is possible that the FCC or the U.S. Congress could adopt additional changes, which may be incompatible with our current or future product offerings, as well as products currently installed in the field, or require them to be modified at significant, or even prohibitive, cost. If the unlicensed frequencies become unacceptably crowded, restrictive or subject to changed laws, regulations or rules governing their use, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Our international growth and future success also depend on the availability of radio spectrum that is compatible with our products, and on our ability to develop products that use alternative communications technology as we continue to integrate our products with products from additional device partners. Certain international markets, such as Europe, use and may continue to use different spectrum bands than the United States, which has in the past and may continue to require us to make modifications to our products in order to operate within the designated spectrum. Additionally, we have in the past and may in the future seek rights and seek to certify our products for using a variety of spectrum in various international markets, however we may not be granted such rights or certifications in all countries. In many other countries, there may not be spectrum available or we may be required to obtain a license to operate in a frequency band that is not immediately compatible with our products. Licenses to appropriate spectrum in these countries may be unavailable or only available at unreasonably high prices. Similarly, in the event that we were only able to obtain a license in a different frequency band, the cost of modifying or redesigning our products to make them compatible with available spectrum could be significant or even cost-prohibitive. Alternatively, if we are not able to obtain available spectrum on financially advantageous terms, we may not be able to compete without investing in alternative communication technology. Moreover, interference caused by others who do not comply with regulatory or statutory requirements could further limit the availability of spectrum that is compatible with our products. If limitations on the availability of spectrum or the cost of making necessary modifications or investments in new technology preclude us from selling our products in markets outside of the United States, our growth, prospects, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

4546

A limited number of our customers are responsible for a significant portion of our revenue, billings and cash flow. A decrease in sales to these customers or delays in customer deployments could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

A substantial majority of our revenue, billings and cash flow depends on relatively large sales to a limited number of customers. The combination of lengthy sales cycles, challenges in securing new customers and relatively large sales to a small number of customers increases the risk of quarterly fluctuations in our billings, revenue and operating results. See Part I, Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, for further information regarding customer concentration. Our MSAs do not impose purchase obligations on our customers until we have received a purchase order or agreed to a statement of work. Further, the MSAs are typically subject to termination for any reason, including for convenience following a specified notice period. We expect that a limited number of customers will continue to account for a substantial portion of our revenue and billings in future periods. Changes in the business requirements, vendor selection, or purchasing behavior of our customers could significantly decrease our sales. In addition, our MSAs are complex, often requiring close coordination with our customers over extended preparation and deployment periods and involving large-scale delivery of our products and services. From time to time we have experienced and may in the future experience challenges in satisfying our customers throughout these preparation and deployment periods regarding all aspects of our performance. Additionally, we have in the past received correspondence from customers claiming that there have been deficiencies in our timeliness and coordination regarding hardware, software and services for deployment, and requesting that we remedy the deficiencies noted. If we are unable to address customers’ concerns, we could be required to pay penalties, liquidated damages or other expenses, the customer could terminate our MSA and our reputation could be damaged. Additionally, delays in customer deployments have in the past, and could in the future, affect our results of operations. Any of these factors could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our marketing efforts depend significantly on our ability to receive positive references from our existing customers.

Our marketing efforts depend significantly on our ability to call on our current customers to provide positive references to new, potential customers. Given our limited number of customers, the loss or dissatisfaction of any customer could substantially harm our brand and reputation, inhibit the market acceptance of our products and services, and impair our ability to attract new customers and maintain existing customers. Any of these consequences could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The markets for our products and services, smart grid, smart city, and broader IoT technology in general, are still developing. If the markets develop less extensively or more slowly than we expect, our business could be harmed.

The markets for our products and services, smart grid, smart city and broader IoT technology in general, are still developing, and it is uncertain whether our products and services will achieve and sustain high levels of demand and market acceptance. Our near-term and long-term success will depend to a substantial extent on the willingness and ability of utilities to implement smart grid technology. Many utilities lack the financial resources and/or technical expertise required to evaluate, deploy and operate smart grid technology. Utilities’ activities are governed by regulatory agencies, including public utility commissions, which may not create a regulatory environment that is conducive to the implementation of smart grid technologies in a particular jurisdiction. Furthermore, some utilities may be reluctant or unwilling to adopt smart grid technology because they do not perceive the benefits or are unable to develop a business case to justify the up-front and ongoing expenditures. If utilities do not implement smart grid technology or do so in fewer numbers or more slowly than we expect, our business and operating results would be adversely affected. For example, in the past, the rate of smart grid adoption slowed due to uncertainty surrounding the timing and tax treatment of U.S. government stimulus funding, negative publicity and consumer opposition, and regulatory investigations. These uncertainties caused many potential customers that had been considering smart grid programs in the United States to further evaluate their smart grid initiatives and delay their procurement processes or extend their deployment schedules. Smart grid adoption in international markets has trailed adoption in the United States as international markets continue to explore the technology and define the benefits and regulatory requirements for the smart grid.

Our success in the smart grid market also depends on our ability to expand beyond advanced metering sales and sell additional products and services, such as distribution automation, demand-side management, and our data analytics platform. There can be no assurance that these products and services will be accepted by utilities or consumers. Similarly, our future success depends on our ability to expand our business beyond the smart grid into smart city infrastructure, such as with our street light solution, and into the broader IoT markets, such as with our Starfish network service. There can be no assurance that these or other smart city and broader IoT products and services will be accepted by cities or other potential customers. Furthermore, our ability to expand our business into the broader IoT markets will depend on our ability to successfully target different prospective customers beyond utilities and cities, and these new prospective customers may have different challenges and requirements than our historical customer base. Other competing products and services for the smart grid, smart city and broader IoT markets may emerge and may be more successful.

4647

Adverse publicity about, or consumer or political opposition to, the smart grid could inhibit the growth of the overall market.

The safety and security of the power grid, the accuracy and protection of the data collected by meters and transmitted via the smart grid, concerns about the safety of smart meters following recent meter-related fires, and concerns about the safety and perceived health risks of using radio frequency communications have been the focus of adverse publicity. For example, in Northern California, Pacific Gas and Electric Co.’s, or PG&E’s, full-scale deployment of our networking platform and advanced metering solution was subject to scrutiny following allegations of inaccurate bills generated by newly-installed “smart meters” and safety concerns about the levels of radio frequency electromagnetic fields emitted by the wireless communications technology used by the meters. As a result, the California State Senate created a special committee and the California Public Utilities Commission, or CPUC, and hired an independent investigator to review the installation and use of advanced metering products. Negative publicity and consumer opposition in California, Maine and elsewhere have caused other utilities or their regulators to respond by delaying or modifying planned smart grid initiatives, mandating that utilities allow their customers to opt out of smart metering programs, or calling for investigations and/or implementation of unfavorable regulations and legislation. Similarly, outside the United States, public concern over smart grid projects in places such as Victoria, Australia has resulted in increased government scrutiny. Additionally, testing commissioned by the CPUC and other organizations could, in the future, contain negative information regarding the accuracy and safety of smart grid solutions. Finally, smart grid projects by other companies may be, or could be viewed by the public as, unsuccessful. Any of the foregoing factors could directly impact our current or future deployments, as well as inhibit the growth of the overall smart grid market, either of which could cause our business to suffer.

Security breaches involving our products or services, publicized breaches in smart grid or smart city products and services offered by others, or the public perception of security risks or vulnerability created by the deployment of the smart grid or smart city in general, whether or not valid, could harm our business.

The security technologies we have integrated into our networking platform and solutions that are designed to detect unauthorized activity and prevent or minimize security breaches may not function as expected and there can be no assurance that our products and services, those of other companies with whose products our products and services are integrated or interact, or even the products of other smart grid and smart city solutions providers, will not be subject to significant real or perceived security breaches.

Our networking and analytics platforms allows utilities to collect, monitor, store, compile and analyze sensitive information related to consumers’ energy usage, as well as the performance of different parts of the power grid. As part of our data transfer and managed services and SaaS services, we may store and/or come into contact with sensitive consumer information and data when we perform operational, installation or maintenance functions for our customers. If, in handling this information, we, our partners or our customers fail to comply with privacy or security laws, we could face significant legal and financial exposure to claims of government agencies, customers and consumers whose privacy is compromised. Even the perception that we, our partners or our customers have improperly handled sensitive, confidential information could have a negative effect on our business. In addition, third parties may attempt to breach our security measures or inappropriately use or access our network services or the network hardware and software we have in the field through computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins, and other means. If a breach is successful, sensitive information may be improperly obtained, manipulated or corrupted, and we may face legal and financial exposure. A breach could also lead to a loss of confidence in our products and services and our business could suffer.

Our current and anticipated future products and services allow authorized personnel to remotely control equipment at residential and commercial locations, at various points on the power grid, and at various points in a city’s critical infrastructure. For example, our software allows a utility to remotely connect and disconnect electricity at specific customer locations. If an unauthorized third-party were to breach our security measures and disrupt, gain access to or take control of any of our products or services, our business and reputation could be severely harmed.

Our products and services may also be integrated or interface with products and services sold by third parties, and rely on the security of those products and their secure transmission of proprietary data over the internet and cellular networks. Because we do not have control over the security measures implemented by third-parties in their products or in the transmission of data over the internet and cellular networks, we cannot ensure the complete integrity or security of such third-party products and transmissions.

Concerns about security, customer or consumer privacy may result in the adoption of state or federal legislation that restricts the implementation of smart grid and smart city technology or requires us to make modifications to our products, which could significantly limit the deployment of our technologies or result in significant expense to modify our products.

Any real or perceived security breach could seriously harm our reputation and result in significant legal and financial exposure, including increased remediation costs and security protection costs, inhibit market acceptance of our products and services, halt or delay the deployment by customers of our products and services, cause us to lose customers, harm our reputation, trigger unfavorable

4748

legislation and regulatory action, and inhibit the growth of the overall market for the smart grid and smart cities. Any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If our products contain defects or otherwise fail to perform as expected, we could be liable for damages and incur unanticipated warranty, recall and other related expenses, our reputation could be damaged, we could lose market share and, as a result, our financial condition or results of operations could suffer.

Our products are complex and may contain defects or experience failures due to any number of issues in design, materials, deployment and/or use. If any of our products contain a defect, compatibility or interoperability issue or other error, we may have to devote significant time and resources to find and correct the issue. Such efforts could divert the attention of our management team and other relevant personnel from other important tasks. A product defect, product recall or a significant number of product returns could be expensive, damage our reputation and relationships with our customers and third-party vendors, result in property damage or physical injury or death, result in the loss of business to competitors, and result in litigation against us. Costs associated with field replacement labor, hardware replacement, re-integration with third-party products, handling charges, correcting defects, errors and bugs, or other issues could be significant and could materially harm our financial results. We have in the past experienced product defects due to faulty components supplied by third-parties, and recorded significant costs associated with warranty claims, write-offs of returned products and customer repair programs implemented as a result.

Estimated future product warranty claims are based on the expected number of field failures over the warranty commitment period, the term of the product warranty period, and the costs for repair, replacement and other associated costs. Our warranty obligations are affected by product failure rates, claims levels, material usage and product re-integration and handling costs. Because our products are relatively new and we do not yet have the benefit of long-term experience observing the products’ performance in the field, our estimates of a product’s lifespan and incidence of claims may be inaccurate. Should actual product failure rates, claims levels, material usage, product re-integration and handling costs, defects, errors, bugs or other issues differ from the original estimates, we could end up incurring materially higher warranty or recall expenses than we anticipate.

Our customer contracts typically contain provisions that could cause us to incur penalties, be liable for damages, and/or incur unanticipated expenses with respect to the functionality, deployment, operation and availability of our products and services, and that provide the customer with the right to terminate the contract for any reason.

In addition to the risk of unanticipated warranty or recall expenses, our customer contracts typically contain provisions that could cause us to incur penalties, be liable for damages, including liquidated damages, or incur other expenses, if we experience difficulties with respect to the functionality, deployment, operation and availability of our products and services. In the event of late deliveries, late or improper installations or operations, failure to meet product or performance specifications or other product defects, interruptions or delays in our managed services offerings, our customer contracts may expose us to penalties, significant damages and other liabilities. For example, we have in the past agreed to reimburse customers for their costs and incurred liquidated damages by failing to timely meet contractual milestones or other contractual requirements. In addition, our customer contracts are typically subject to termination for any reason, including for convenience following a specified notice period, our material breach or insolvency, or the failure to obtain required regulatory approval. If a customer terminates its customer contract for any reason, our estimates of total backlog and order backlog will be reduced. Reductions in total backlog and order backlog may have a negative effect on future revenue, billings, profitability and liquidity. In the event we were to incur contractual penalties, such as liquidated damages or other related costs that exceed our expectations, or our customers terminate their contracts with us, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.

Our success depends in part on our ability to integrate our technology into devices and our relationship with device manufacturers.

Our business depends on our ability to integrate our communications modules into devices manufactured by third-party vendors. For example, for our advanced metering solution, our communications modules are integrated into electricity meters that are manufactured by third parties such as Aclara Technologies LLC, Secure Meters Limited and Toshiba Corporation, among others. A similar structure is used in our street light solution, where fulfillment of our communications modules is often completed by our partners who manufacture lighting fixtures or control modules. In a typical deployment, our customer purchases integrated devices from one or more third-party device manufacturers after integration of our communications modules into the device. Accordingly, even if demand for our products is strong, we have in the past and may in the future be constrained by the production capacity and priorities of the device manufacturers. In addition, several of these device manufacturers offer competing products, partner with other providers or may otherwise choose not to integrate our communications modules with their devices. If for technical or any other reason we were to lose the ability to integrate our communications modules with devices manufactured by third parties, or if our relationships with device manufacturers were to be terminated or renegotiated on unfavorable terms, our business, financial condition, and operating results could suffer. Further, there have been instances where devices with which our technology had been integrated

4849

experienced defects or had other problems that were unrelated to our technology. If this occurs in the future and the defects or problems are more significant or occur more frequently, our reputation could suffer and our business could be harmed.

From time to time, we have worked and expect to continue to work with third parties to pursue smart grid, smart city and broader IoT market opportunities. If we are unable to establish and maintain these relationships, or if our initiatives with these third parties are unsuccessful, our business may suffer.

For some of our existing and anticipated future products and services, we expect to maintain and may seek to establish relationships with third parties in order to take advantage of smart grid, smart city and broader IoT market opportunities. For example, we have designed our products to interface with in-home devices and data analytics products, and will need to work with third parties to successfully deploy these products. Before a customer is willing to move forward with a deployment of our products, they may require that we partner with third-party vendors and/or obtain a certification from these vendors that our products will function as intended when integrated with their products. In addition, third-party vendors may offer competing products, partner with other networking providers or otherwise choose not to partner with us. In the event that we are unable to establish or maintain new relationships on favorable terms, or at all, our ability to successfully sell our existing and anticipated future products and services could be jeopardized.

We may not be able to identify adequate strategic relationship opportunities, or form strategic relationships, in the future.

Strategic business relationships may be an important factor in the growth and success of our business. However, there are no assurances that we will be able to identify or secure suitable business relationship opportunities in the future and our competitors may capitalize on such opportunities before we do. Moreover, identifying such opportunities could demand substantial management time and resources and involves significant costs and uncertainties. If we are unable to successfully source and execute on strategic relationship opportunities in the future, our business and results of operations could be significantly harmed.

As we continue to expand our business and evolve our technology, we may face unexpected challenges in the adoption, deployment and operation of our technology.

The smart grid, smart city, and broader IoT markets are still expanding and involve rapidly changing technology, which requires us to continue to expand our business and evolve our technology. The current generation of our networking platform and solutions has only been developed in the last several years. We announced our next generation networking platform and solutions, Gen5, in January 2015, and announced Starfish, a wireless network service for the IoT, in December 2015. We expect each of these technologies to continue to evolve over time. We may face unexpected problems or challenges in connection with the introduction and deployment of our new Gen5 platform and solutions and Starfish, including in the adoption and acceptance by our existing and potential customers, for a variety of reasons such as:

•

real or perceived inability to operate effectively with the technologies, systems or applications of our existing or potential customers;

•

defects, errors or failures in our products and solutions;

•

negative publicity about its performance or effectiveness;

•

delays in releasing Gen5, Starfish, or other new technologies to the market; and

•

the introduction or anticipated introduction of competing products or technologies by our competitors.

If Gen5, Starfish, or other new technologies do not achieve adequate acceptance and adoption in the market, we may not realize our investments in their research and development, our competitive position will be impaired, and our results of operations could be adversely affected.

In addition, deploying and operating our technology is a complex endeavor. As the size, complexity and scope of our deployments have expanded, we have been able to test product performance at a greater scale and in a variety of new geographic settings and environmental conditions. These larger deployments have presented a number of unforeseen operational and technical challenges, which in some cases have caused delays and required us to commit significant resources to address these challenges. As the number, size and complexity of our deployments grow, we may continue to encounter unforeseen operational, technical and other challenges, some of which could cause significant delays, trigger contractual penalties, result in unanticipated expenses, and/or damage to our reputation, each of which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

4950

If we fail to respond to evolving technological changes, our products and services could become obsolete or less competitive.

Our industry is highly competitive and characterized by new and rapidly evolving technologies, standards, regulations, customer requirements, and frequent product introductions. Accordingly, our operating results depend upon, among other things, our ability to develop and introduce new products and services, as well as our ability to reduce production costs of our existing products. The process of developing new technologies and products is complex, and if we are unable to develop enhancements to, and new features for, our existing products or acceptable new products that keep pace with technological developments or industry standards, our products may become obsolete, less marketable and less competitive and our business could be significantly harmed.

We depend on our ability to develop new products and to enhance and sustain the quality of existing products.

Most of our current revenue and billings are derived from our networking platform and advanced metering solution, but our growth and future success will depend, in part, on our ability to continue to design and manufacture new competitive products that achieve market acceptance and to enhance and sustain the quality and marketability of our existing products. As such, we have made, and expect to continue to make, substantial investments in technology development. Any new technology or product that we develop may not be introduced in a timely or cost-effective manner, may not be priced appropriately, and may not achieve the broad market acceptance necessary to generate significant revenue. For example, in January 2015 we announced Gen5, our next generation networking platform and solutions, and in December 2015 we announced Starfish, a wireless network service for the IoT. In previous years, we introduced our street light and SilverLink Data Platform solutions. These new products and solutions may not be adopted by prospective or existing customers to the extent we anticipate, or at all. In the future, we may not have the necessary capital, or access to capital on acceptable terms, to fund necessary levels of research and development. Even with adequate capital resources, we may nonetheless experience unforeseen problems in the development or performance of our technologies or products. The markets for smart grid, smart city, and broader IoT technology products are still in their early stages, and we cannot assure you that we will be successful in developing or selling new products in these markets. In addition, we may not meet our product development schedules and, even if we do, we may not develop new products fast enough to provide sufficient differentiation from our competitors’ products, which may be more successful. If we are unable to develop new products or enhance or sustain the quality of our existing products, successfully develop and deploy new technology and products or integrate these new technologies into devices manufactured by our third-party devices, our business and operating results could be harmed.

We and our customers operate in a highly regulated business environment and changes in regulation could impose costs on us or make our products less economical.

Our products and our customers are subject to federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations. Laws and regulations applicable to us and our products govern, among other things, the manner in which our products communicate, and the environmental impact and electrical reliability of our products. Additionally, our U.S. customers are often regulated by national, state and/or local bodies, including public utility commissions, the Department of Energy, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and other bodies. International customers are often subject to similar regulatory regimes. Prospective customers may be required to gain approval from any or all of these organizations prior to implementing our products and services, including specific permissions related to the cost recovery of these systems. Regulatory agencies may impose special requirements for implementation and operation of our products. We may incur material costs or liabilities in complying with government regulations applicable to us or our customers. In addition, potentially significant expenditures could be required in order to comply with evolving regulations and requirements that may be adopted or imposed on us or our customers in the future. Such costs could make our products less economical and could impact our customers’ willingness to adopt our products, which could materially and adversely affect our revenue, results of operations and financial condition.

Furthermore, changes in the underlying regulatory conditions that affect utilities could have a potentially adverse effect on a utility’s interest or ability to implement smart grid technologies. For example, ongoing regulatory uncertainties have in the past delayed the timing of some deployments. Many regulatory jurisdictions have implemented rules that provide financial incentives for the implementation of energy efficiency and demand response technologies, often by providing rebates or through the restructuring of utility rates. If these programs were to cease, or if they were restructured in a manner inconsistent with the capabilities enabled by our products and services, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be significantly harmed.

The adoption of industry standards applicable to our products or services could limit our ability to compete in the marketplace.

Standards bodies, which are formal and informal associations that seek to establish voluntary, non-governmental product and technology standards, are influential in the United States and abroad. We participate in voluntary standards organizations in order to both help promote non-proprietary, open standards for interoperability with our products and prevent the adoption of exclusionary standards. However, we are not able to control the content of adopted voluntary standards and do not have the resources to participate in all voluntary standards processes that may affect our markets. Some of the standards bodies and alliances in which we participate

5051

may require that we license certain of our patent claims that are necessary or essential to practice a particular standard to other participants, including competitors who elect to produce products compliant with that standard. These obligations to license our necessary patent claims may allow our competitors to use our patents to develop and sell products that compete with our products without spending the time and expense that we incurred to develop the technology covered by the patents, thereby potentially reducing any time to market advantage we might have as a result of these patents. These obligations could also substantially restrict and may eliminate our ability to use our patents as a barrier to entry or as a significant source of revenue. Moreover, because the specifications for these industry standards are generally available to members of the applicable standards bodies and alliances for little or no cost, competitors might be able to more easily create products that compete with our products.

The adoption, or expected adoption, of voluntary standards that are incompatible with our products or technology or that favor our competitors’ products or technology could limit the market opportunity for our products and services or render them obsolete, any of which could materially and adversely affect our revenue, results of operations and financial condition.

If our products do not interoperate with our customers’ other systems, the purchase or deployment of our products and services may be delayed or cancelled.

Our products are designed to interface with our customers’ back office billing and other systems, each of which may have different specifications and utilize multiple protocol standards and products from other vendors. Our products will be required to interoperate with many or all of these products as well as future products in order to meet our customers’ requirements. If we find errors in the existing software or defects in the hardware used in our customers’ systems, we may need to modify our products or services to fix or overcome these errors so that our products will interoperate with the existing software and hardware, which could be costly and negatively affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. In addition, if our products and services do not interoperate with our customers’ systems, customers may seek to hold us liable, demand for our products could be adversely affected or orders for our products could be delayed or cancelled. This could hurt our operating results, damage our reputation, and seriously harm our business and prospects.

Interruptions or delays in services from our third-party data center facilities, or problems with the third-party hardware or software that we employ, could impair the delivery of our services and harm our business.

We currently offer managed services and SaaS, including disaster recovery services, utilizing two data center facilities operated by separate third parties in California and Nevada. These facilities may be vulnerable to damage or interruption from, among other things, fire, natural disaster, power loss, telecommunications failure, war, acts of terrorism, unauthorized entry, human error, and computer viruses or other defects. They may also be subject to break-ins, sabotage, intentional acts of vandalism and similar misconduct. We rely on software and hardware technology provided by third-parties to enable us to provide these services. Any damage to, or failure of, these third-party data centers or the third-party hardware and software we employ, could result in significant and lengthy interruptions in the services we provide to our customers. Such interruptions could reduce our revenue and billings, cause us to issue credits or pay penalties, cause customers to terminate their services, harm our reputation and adversely affect our ability to attract new customers.

We do not control certain critical aspects of the manufacture of our products and depend on a limited number of contract manufacturers.

Our future success will depend significantly on our ability to manufacture our products timely and cost-effectively, in sufficient volumes, and in accordance with quality standards. Currently, our primary manufacturing relationships are with Celestica, Inc. and Flextronics International Ltd. These vendors provide us with a wide range of operational and manufacturing services, including material procurement, final assembly, test quality control, warranty repair, and shipment to our customers and third-party vendors.

Our reliance on our contract manufacturers reduces our control over the manufacturing process, exposing us to risks, including reduced control over quality assurance, product costs and product supply. Any manufacturing disruption by our contract manufacturers could impair our ability to fulfill orders and warranty repair obligations. We may be unable to manage our relationships with our contract manufacturers effectively as they may experience delays, disruptions, capacity constraints or quality control problems in their manufacturing operations or otherwise fail to meet our future requirements for timely delivery. Similarly, to the extent that our contract manufacturers procure materials on our behalf, we may not benefit from any warranties received by the contract manufacturers from the suppliers or otherwise have recourse against the original supplier of the materials or even the contract manufacturer. In such circumstances, if the original supplier were to provide us or our contract manufacturers with faulty materials, we might not be able to recover the costs of such materials or be compensated for any damages that arise as a result of the inclusion of the faulty components in our products. For example, in the past we discovered that faulty components from third-party suppliers were used in a discrete number of our communications modules.

5152

One or more of our contract manufacturers may suffer an interruption in its business, or experience delays, disruptions or quality control problems in its manufacturing operations, or seek to terminate its relationship with us, or we may choose to change or add additional contract manufacturers for other reasons. Additionally, we do not have long-term supply agreements with our contract manufacturers. As a result, we may be unable to renew or extend our agreement on terms favorable to us, if at all. Although the contract manufacturing services required to manufacture and assemble our products may be readily available from a number of established manufacturers, it is risky, time consuming and costly to qualify and implement contract manufacturer relationships.

We depend on a limited number of key suppliers and if such suppliers fail to provide us with sufficient quantities of components at acceptable levels of quality and at anticipated costs, our revenue and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.

Several of the components used in our products come from sole, limited source or geographically concentrated suppliers, such as Analog Devices, Microchip Technology Incorporated, Renesas Electronics America Inc. and STMicroelectronics, Inc. Additionally, our suppliers are not typically contractually obligated to supply us with components in minimum quantities or at predetermined prices over the long term. Accordingly, we may be vulnerable to price increases, component quality issues, the discontinuance of certain components, and financial, natural disasters, or other difficulties faced by our suppliers, causing shortages or interruptions in supply of components and materials, which could cause us to delay shipments to our customers. For example, in April 2017, one of our suppliers notified us of a catastrophic fire at its plant, which could compromise their ability to provide us with a sufficient quantity of a component used in our gas products. In addition, some of our key suppliers are located in Japan and their ability to timely provide us with the necessary components used in our products was compromised as a result of the catastrophic earthquake and tsunami in 2011. To help address these issues, we may purchase excess quantities of these items to hold in inventory to help ensure adequate available supply. As a result, we could be forced to record excess and obsolete inventory charges to provide for these excess quantities and we may also be subject to pricing risk or carrying charges, which could harm our operating results.

If we experience any shortages due to reliance on a limited number of suppliers, commodity supply constraints, capacity constraints, discontinuance, natural disasters or price fluctuations related to the raw materials used, or if we are not able to identify, test, qualify, and procure components from alternate sources at acceptable prices and within a reasonable period of time, our reputation could suffer and our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely effected. We may not be able to obtain component replacements on commercially reasonable terms in the event of a natural disaster, act of God or similar catastrophic event. In such circumstances, we could be forced to exhaust our excess on-hand inventory and then face a delay in shipments of our products to our customers. In addition, we may also be subject to contractual penalties if we fail to deliver our products and services on time.

Further, our customers may reschedule or cancel orders on relatively short notice. If our customers cancel orders after we have ordered the corresponding product from our suppliers, we may be forced to incur cancellation fees or to purchase products that we may not be able to resell, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business could be severely harmed by natural disasters or other catastrophes.

A significant catastrophic event such as war, acts of terrorism, natural disasters, such as earthquakes, or global threats, including, but not limited to, the outbreak of epidemic disease, could disrupt our operations and impair deployment of our solutions by our customers, interrupt critical functions, cause our suppliers to be unable to meet our demand for parts and equipment, reduce demand for our products, prevent our customers from honoring their contractual obligations to us or otherwise affect our business negatively. To the extent that such disruptions or uncertainties result in delays or cancellations of customer orders or the deployment of our products, or the manufacture or shipment of our products, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.

We operate in a highly competitive industry and we compete against many companies with substantially greater financial and other resources, and our market share and results of operations may be reduced if we are unable to respond to our competitors effectively.

Competition in our market is intense and involves quickly changing technologies, evolving industry standards, frequent new product introductions, rapid consolidation, and changes in customer requirements. To maintain and improve our competitive position, we must keep pace with the evolving needs of our customers and continue to develop and introduce new solutions, applications and services in a timely and efficient manner. Our competitors range from small companies to very large and established companies. These competitors offer a variety of products and services related to the smart grid and smart city and come from a number of industries, including traditional meter manufacturers, application developers, telecommunications vendors, street light providers, and other service providers. We compete with traditional meter manufacturers that incorporate various communications technologies that provide some level of connectivity to the utility’s back office. Our key competitors in this segment include Aclara Incorporated, Honeywell International Inc., Itron Inc., ~~Toshiba~~Landis+Gyr, ~~Corporation~~Inc., Trilliant Holdings, Inc. and Xylem, Inc. Similarly, we compete with

5253

traditional providers of distribution automation equipment, such as Cisco Systems, Inc., General Electric, S&C Electric Company and Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories, Inc. We also face competition from newer entrants that are providing specific narrowly focused products for the smart grid, including C3 IoT Inc., Grid Net Inc., Opower Inc. (which was acquired by Oracle Corporation), and Tendril Networks Inc. In smart lighting and smart cities, we compete against companies such as Echelon Corporation, Harvard Engineering PLC, Telensa Limited, Verizon Wireless, and proprietary offerings from lighting manufacturers, such as General Electric, Royal Philips Electronics, Schreder Group and others. We expect to face additional competitors as we expand into the broader IoT from companies such as SIGFOX and Ingenu, as well as Semtech Corporation, which is working to build a broad IoT ecosystem within the cellular community through the LoRa Alliance, an open, non-profit association of members with a mission to enable the IoT. Furthermore, other large companies such as Alcatel-Lucent S.A., AT&T Inc., Cisco Systems, Inc., Enel SpA, Électricité Réseau Distribution France, Fujitsu Limited, General Electric Company, International Business Machines Corporation, Siemens AG, Sprint Nextel Corporation, Vodafone Group Plc, Verizon Communications Inc. and others have announced plans to pursue business opportunities related to the smart grid, smart city, and the broader IoT. As we look to expand into new international markets, we expect to face additional competitors that may be more established in specific geographies. We anticipate that in the future, additional competitors will emerge that offer a broad range of competing products and services related to the smart grid, smart city, and the broader IoT, some of which may be competitive with our offerings.

Several of our competitors enjoy substantial competitive advantages such as:

•

greater name recognition and longer operating histories;

•

larger sales and marketing budgets and resources;

•

greater ability to integrate their products with existing systems;

•

broader distribution channels;

•

established relationships with existing and potential partners and customers;

•

lower labor and development costs; and

•

significantly greater financial, technical, customer support and other resources.

Some of these larger competitors have substantially broader product offerings and may be able to leverage the existing relationships they have with customers. In some cases, our larger competitors are also currently vendors of ours, and they could decide in the future to develop their own products instead of working with us. Any inability to effectively manage these relationships could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results, and financial condition, and accordingly affect our chances of success. In addition, some of our competitors may have larger patent portfolios than we have, which may provide them with a competitive advantage and may require us to engage in costly litigation to protect and defend our freedom to operate and/or intellectual property rights.

Conditions in our market could change rapidly and significantly as a result of technological advancements or market consolidation. The development and market acceptance of alternative technologies could decrease the demand for our products or render them obsolete. Our competitors may introduce products and services that are less costly, provide superior performance or achieve greater market acceptance than our products and services. In order to remain competitive, we may need to lower prices or attempt to add incremental features and functionality, which could negatively impact our revenue, billings, gross margin and financial condition. In addition, our larger competitors often have broader product lines and are in a better position to withstand any significant reduction in capital spending by customers in the smart grid and smart city markets, and will therefore not be as susceptible to downturns in a particular market. If we are unable to compete successfully in the future, our business may be harmed.

We have experienced, and may in the future experience, rapid changes in the pace of our growth. If we fail to manage our growth effectively, our financial performance may suffer.

We have substantially expanded our overall business, customer base, employee headcount and operations both domestically and internationally in the past, and may do so in the future in response to market conditions and opportunities. Our expansion has placed, and any future growth could continue to place, a significant strain on our managerial, customer operations, research and development, sales and marketing, manufacturing, administrative, financial and other resources. If we are unable to manage our growth successfully, or manage our operating expenses effectively, our operating results will suffer. In March 2017, we approved a restructuring plan designed to drive progress towards our long-term business model and to better align investments to our growth and key businesses. As a result of the restructuring, we have and expect to continue to adjust worldwide headcount, and expect to incur certain facility-related expenses. We have in the past undertaken similar cost savings initiatives, including a restructuring in 2014 that involved a reduction in force. We may from time to time decide to undertake additional cost savings initiatives, such as additional restructurings, disposing of, and/or otherwise discontinuing certain products, in an effort to focus our resources on key strategic initiatives and ~~streamline our business. Any~~

5354

streamline our business. Any decision to take these actions may result in charges to earnings associated with, among other things, inventory or other fixed, intangible or goodwill asset reductions (including, without limitation, impairment charges), workforce and facility reductions and penalties and claims from customers or other third parties. These charges would affect our operating results and may exceed estimated and disclosed amounts or may not lead to improvements in results of operations at expected levels. In addition to the costs associated with these activities, we may not realize any of the anticipated benefits of the underlying cost savings initiatives.

We rely on our management team and need additional personnel to grow our business, and the loss of one or more key employees or our inability to attract and retain qualified personnel could harm our business.

Our success and future growth depend on the skills, working relationships and continued services of our management team and other key personnel. The loss of any member of our senior management team or other key personnel could adversely affect our business.

Since September 2015, we have experienced several leadership transitions with our senior management team, including our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Chief Operating Officer, and our former Co-Founder and Executive Vice President, Global Development. Leadership transitions can be inherently difficult to manage and may cause operational and administrative inefficiencies, added costs, uncertainty and decreased productivity among our employees, increase the likelihood of turnover, and result in the loss of personnel with deep institutional knowledge, which could result in significant disruptions to our operations. In addition, we must successfully integrate the new management team members within our organization in order to achieve our operating objectives, and changes in key management positions may temporarily affect our financial performance and results of operations as new management becomes familiar with our business. The presence of new management team members, and the loss of key personnel, may also impact our relationships with customers and vendors, resulting in loss of business and loss of vendor relationships. The uncertainty inherent in our recent management changes could also lead to concerns from current and potential third parties with whom we do business, any of which could damage our business prospects.

Our future success will also depend on our ability to attract, retain and motivate highly skilled management, product development, operations, sales, technical and other personnel in the United States and abroad. We have in the past lost members of our senior management team and other key personnel, which could adversely affect our business. We could also be adversely affected if we fail to adequately plan for the succession of members of our senior management team and other key personnel should we have departures. Even in today’s economic climate, competition for these types of personnel is intense, particularly in the Silicon Valley, where our headquarters are located. All of our employees in the United States work for us on an at-will basis. Given the lengthy sales cycles with customers and deployment periods of our networking platform and solutions, the loss of key personnel could adversely affect our business.

Volatility or lack of performance in our stock price may also affect our ability to attract and retain our senior management, key personnel and other employees. Many of our longest-tenured employees, including members of our senior management and key personnel with deep institutional knowledge, hold significant vested stock options and shares of our common stock. Employees may be more likely to leave us if the shares they own or the shares underlying their vested stock options have significantly appreciated in value relative to the original purchase prices of the shares or the exercise prices of the options, or if the exercise prices of the options that they hold are significantly above the market price of our common stock. As a result of these factors, we may be unable to attract or retain qualified personnel. Our inability to attract and retain the necessary personnel could adversely affect our business.

Our ability to provide bid bonds, performance bonds or letters of credit is limited and could negatively affect our ability to bid on or enter into significant long-term agreements.

We have in the past been, and may in the future be, required to provide bid bonds or performance bonds to secure our performance under customer contracts or, in some cases, as a pre-requisite to submit a bid on a potential project. For example, in connection with ~~the~~prior ~~litigation~~patent ~~with~~infringement ~~EON Corp. IP Holdings~~litigation, ~~LLC,~~ we were required to provide a surety bond that was later released by the district court in order to stay the execution of a judgment pending our appeal. Our ability to obtain such bonds primarily depends upon our capitalization, working capital, past performance, management expertise and reputation and external factors beyond our control, including the overall capacity of the surety market. Surety companies consider those factors in relation to the amount of our tangible net worth and other underwriting standards that may change from time to time. Surety companies may require that we collateralize a percentage of the bond with our cash or other form of credit enhancement. Events that affect surety markets generally may result in bonding becoming more difficult to obtain in the future, or being available only at a significantly greater cost. In addition, some of our customers also require collateral guarantees in the form of letters of credit to secure performance or to fund possible damages as the result of an event of default under our contracts with them. If we enter into significant long-term agreements that require the issuance of letters of credit, our liquidity could be negatively impacted. Our inability to obtain adequate bonding or letters of credit to meet bid ~~requirements or enter into significant long-term agreements could have a material adverse effect on our future revenue and business prospects.~~

5455

requirements or enter into significant long-term agreements could have a material adverse effect on our future revenue and business prospects.

We are subject to international business uncertainties.

Our ability to grow our business and our future success will depend to a significant extent on our ability to expand our operations and customer base worldwide. Operating in international markets requires significant resources and management attention, and other than our existing international operations, we have limited experience entering new geographic markets. There can be no assurance that our international efforts will be successful. International sales and operations may be subject to risks such as:

•

technology compatibility;

•

the imposition of government controls;

•

government expropriation of facilities;

•

political instability;

•

lack of a well-established system of laws and enforcement of those laws;

•

compliance with multiple, conflicting and changing governmental laws and regulations, including United States laws such as the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and local laws that prohibit bribes and certain payments to governmental officials such as the UK Bribery Act 2010, data privacy requirements, labor relations laws, tax laws, anti-competition regulations, import and trade restrictions, governmental rebate requirements and export requirements;

•

lack of a legal system free of undue influence or corruption;

•

exposure to a business culture in which improper sales practices may be prevalent;

•

terrorist activities;

•

restrictions on the import or export of critical technology;

•

currency exchange rate fluctuations;

•

adverse tax burdens;

•

lack of availability of qualified third-party financing;

•

generally longer receivable collection periods than in the United States;

•

trade restrictions;

•

changes in tariffs;

•

labor disruptions;

•

difficulties in staffing and managing foreign operations;

•

preference for local vendors;

•

burdens of complying with different permitting standards; and

•

a wide variety of foreign laws and obstacles to the repatriation of earnings and cash.

Fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar may impact our ability to compete in international markets. International expansion and market acceptance depend on our ability to modify our business approach and technology to take into account such factors as differing customer business models, product requirements and needs, the applicable regulatory and business environment, labor costs and other economic conditions. In addition, the laws of certain countries do not protect our intellectual property to the same extent as do the laws of the United States. There can be no assurance that these factors will not have a material adverse effect on our future international sales and, consequently, on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Developments in data protection laws and regulations may affect technology relating to smart grid products and solutions, which could adversely affect the demand for our products and solutions.

Our products and services may be subject to data protection laws and regulations that impose a general framework for the collection, processing and use of personal data. Our networking platform and solutions rely on the transfer of data relating to individual energy use and may be affected by these laws and regulations. It is unclear how the regulations governing the transfer of personal data in connection with privacy requirements will further develop in the United States and internationally, and to what extent this may affect technology relating to smart grid products and solutions. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

5556

personal data in connection with privacy requirements will further develop in the United States and internationally, and to what extent this may affect technology relating to smart grid products and solutions. This could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Adverse changes in general economic or political conditions in any of the major countries in which we do business could adversely affect our operating results.

Our business can be affected by a number of factors that are beyond our control, such as general geopolitical, economic, and business conditions. The continued global economic uncertainty and continued global monetary, financial and sovereign debt crisis could have a negative effect on our business. For example, the worldwide financial and credit crisis reduced the availability of liquidity and credit to fund the continuation and expansion of business operations worldwide. Even with economic recovery, it may take time for our customers or potential customers to establish new budgets and return to normal purchasing patterns. We cannot predict the recurrence of any economic slowdown or the strength or sustainability of the economic recovery, worldwide, in the United States or in our industry. These and other economic factors could adversely affect the demand for our products and services and, consequently, our business, financial condition and results of operations.

There can be no assurance that a deterioration in financial markets will not impair our ability or our customers’ ability to obtain financing in the future, including, but not limited to, our or our customers’ ability to incur indebtedness if necessary. In addition, there could be several residual effects from the credit crisis on our business, including insolvency of certain of our key customers or suppliers, which could result in the inability of our customers to obtain credit to finance purchases of our products.

Our inability to acquire and integrate other businesses, products or technologies could seriously harm our competitive position.

In order to remain competitive, obtain key competencies or accelerate our time to market, we may seek to acquire additional businesses, products or technologies. To date, we have completed only three small acquisitions, and we therefore have limited experience in successfully acquiring and integrating additional businesses, products or technologies. If we identify an appropriate acquisition candidate, we may not be successful in negotiating the terms of the acquisition, financing the acquisition, or effectively integrating the acquired business, product or technology into our existing business and operations. We may have difficulty integrating acquired businesses, technologies or products with our existing products and services. Our due diligence may fail to identify all of the problems, liabilities or other shortcomings or challenges of an acquired business, product or technology, including issues related to intellectual property, product quality or product architecture, regulatory compliance practices, revenue recognition or other accounting practices or employee or customer issues. If we finance acquisitions by issuing convertible debt or equity securities, our existing stockholders may be diluted, which could affect the market price of our stock. In addition, any acquisitions we are able to complete may not result in the synergies or any other benefits we had expected to achieve, which could result in substantial write-offs or impairment charges. Further, contemplating or completing an acquisition and integrating an acquired business, product or technology will significantly divert management and employee time and resources.

Our business may suffer if it is alleged or found that our products infringe the intellectual property rights of others.

Our industry is characterized by the existence of a large number of patents and by litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. Moreover, in recent years, individuals and groups have purchased patents and other intellectual property assets for the purpose of making claims of infringement in order to extract settlements from companies like ours. From time to time, third parties have claimed and may continue to claim that we are infringing upon their patents or other intellectual property rights. For example, we are currently engaged in litigation as further described in Part II, Item 1. Legal Proceedings. In addition, we may be contractually obligated to indemnify our customers or other third parties that use or resell our products in the event our products are alleged to infringe a third-party’s intellectual property rights. Responding to such claims, regardless of their merit, can be time consuming, costly to defend in litigation, divert management’s attention and resources, damage our reputation and brand, and cause us to incur significant expenses. Even if we are indemnified against such costs, the indemnifying party may be unable to uphold its contractual obligations. Further, claims of intellectual property infringement might require us to redesign affected products, delay affected product offerings, enter into costly settlement or license agreements or pay costly damage awards or face a temporary or permanent injunction prohibiting us from marketing, selling or distributing the affected products. If we cannot or do not license alleged infringed technology on reasonable terms or at all, or substitute similar technology from another source, our revenue and earnings could be adversely impacted. Additionally, our customers may not purchase our products if they are concerned that our products infringe third-party intellectual property rights. This could reduce the market opportunity for the sale of our products and services. The occurrence of any of these events may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The success of our business depends on our ability to protect and enforce our intellectual property rights.

We rely on a combination of patent, trademark, trade dress, copyright, unfair competition and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual restrictions, to establish and protect our proprietary rights. These laws, procedures and restrictions provide only limited protection and any of our intellectual property rights may be challenged, invalidated, circumvented, infringed or misappropriated. Further, the laws of certain countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent as the laws of the United States and, therefore, in certain jurisdictions, we may be unable to protect our proprietary technology adequately against unauthorized third-party copying, infringement or use, which could adversely affect our competitive position.

56As of June 30, 2017, we had 122 issued patents and 63 patent applications pending in the United States. In foreign jurisdictions, we have 174 patents granted and 66 patent applications pending, which are collectively based on 69 U.S. patent applications. Our patents expire at various times between 2017 and 2035. We cannot ensure that any of our pending applications will be granted or that any of our issued patents will adequately protect our intellectual property. In addition, third parties have in the past and could in the future bring infringement, invalidity, co-inventorship, re-examination, or similar claims with respect to any of our currently issued patents or any patents that may be issued to us in the future. Any such claims, whether or not successful, could be extremely costly to defend, divert management’s attention and resources, damage our reputation and brand, and substantially harm our business and results of operations.

the United States and, therefore, in certain jurisdictions, we may be unable to protect our proprietary technology adequately against unauthorized third-party copying, infringement or use, which could adversely affect our competitive position.

As of March 31, 2017, we had 115 issued patents and 65 patent applications pending in the United States. In foreign jurisdictions, we have 173 patents granted and 65 patent applications pending, which are collectively based on 69 U.S. patent applications. Our patents expire at various times between 2017 and 2035. We cannot ensure that any of our pending applications will be granted or that any of our issued patents will adequately protect our intellectual property. In addition, third parties have in the past and could in the future bring infringement, invalidity, co-inventorship, re-examination, or similar claims with respect to any of our currently issued patents or any patents that may be issued to us in the future. Any such claims, whether or not successful, could be extremely costly to defend, divert management’s attention and resources, damage our reputation and brand, and substantially harm our business and results of operations.

In order to protect or enforce our patent rights, protect our trade secrets or know-how, or determine the enforceability, scope and validity of the proprietary rights of others, we may initiate patent litigation or other proceedings against third parties, such as infringement suits or interference proceedings. Any lawsuits or proceedings that we initiate could be expensive, take significant time and divert management’s attention from other business concerns. Litigation and other proceedings also put our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our patent applications at risk of not issuing. Additionally, we may provoke third parties to assert claims against us. We may not prevail in any lawsuits or other proceedings that we initiate and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially valuable. The occurrence of any of these events may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Some of our products rely on technologies developed or licensed by third-parties. We may seek to license technology from third parties for future products and services. We may not be able to obtain or continue to obtain licenses and technologies from these third parties on commercially reasonable terms or at all. Our inability to retain our current third-party licenses or obtain third-party licenses required to develop new products or product enhancements could require us to obtain alternate technology that may be of lower quality or performance standards or at greater cost, or could require that we change our product and design plans, any of which could limit or delay our ability to manufacture and sell our products.

If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our proprietary information, the value of our technology and products could be adversely affected.

In addition to patented technology, we rely on our unpatented technology and trade secrets. We generally seek to protect this information by confidentiality, non-disclosure and assignment of invention agreements with our employees and contractors and with parties with which we do business. These agreements may be breached and we may not have adequate remedies for any such breach. We cannot be certain that the steps we have taken will prevent unauthorized use or reverse engineering of our technology. Moreover, our trade secrets may be disclosed to or otherwise become known or be independently developed by competitors. To the extent that our employees, contractors, or other third parties with whom we do business use intellectual property owned by others in their work for us, disputes may arise as to the rights in related or resulting know-how and inventions. If, for any of the above reasons, our intellectual property is disclosed or misappropriated, it would harm our ability to protect our rights and have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

We use open source software in our products and services that may subject our products and services to general release or require us to re-engineer our products and services, which may cause harm to our business.

We use open source software in connection with our products and services. From time to time, companies that incorporate open source software into their products have faced claims challenging the ownership of open source software and/or compliance with open source license terms. Therefore, we could be subject to suits by parties claiming ownership of what we believe to be open source software or noncompliance with open source licensing terms. Some open source software licenses require users who distribute open source software as part of their software to publicly disclose all or part of the source code to such software and/or make available any derivative works of the open source code on unfavorable terms or at no cost. While we monitor the use of open source software in our products and services and try to ensure that none is used in a manner that would require us to disclose the source code to the related product or that would otherwise breach the terms of an open source agreement, such use could inadvertently occur and we may be required to release our proprietary source code, pay damages for breach of contract, re-engineer our products, discontinue the sale of our products in the event re-engineering cannot be accomplished on a timely basis or take other remedial action that may divert resources away from our development efforts, any of which could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

5758

our products in the event re-engineering cannot be accomplished on a timely basis or take other remedial action that may divert resources away from our development efforts, any of which could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

Some of our customers and potential customers have applied for government grants and may also seek to participate in other government incentive programs, and if those grants or other incentives are not received or are significantly delayed, our results of operations could suffer.

Many utilities, including some of our customers and potential customers, apply for grants and may seek to participate in other government incentive programs, designed to stimulate the economy and support environmental initiatives, including smart grid technologies. Our customers and potential customers who apply for these government grants or incentives may delay or condition the purchase of our products and services upon receipt of such funds or upon their confidence in the future disbursement of those funds. If our customers and potential customers do not receive these funds or if receipt is significantly delayed, our results of operations could suffer. Similarly, the receipt of government funds or incentives may be conditioned upon utilities meeting milestones and other requirements, some of which may not be known until a future point in time. In addition, if our products and services do not meet the requirements necessary for receipt of government funds or other incentives, or if third parties fail to meet their obligations, our customers and potential customers may delay or condition the purchase of our products and services until they meet these requirements and our results of operations could suffer. Furthermore, there can be no assurance of government funds or incentives in future periods, either in the United States or in other countries where we may pursue business. As a result, our customers and potential customers may not have the resources or incentives to purchase our products and services.

We are an “emerging growth company,” and any decision on our part to comply with certain reduced disclosure requirements applicable to emerging growth companies could make our common stock less attractive to investors.

We are an “emerging growth company,” or EGC, as defined in the JOBS Act, and, for as long as we continue to be an EGC, we may choose to take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements applicable to other public companies including, but not limited to, not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We could be an emerging growth company for up to five years from our initial public offering date, although if our annual revenue exceeds $1.0 billion in any year or our market value of our common stock that is held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of June 30 of any year before the end of that five-year period, we would cease to be an EGC as of December 31 of that year. If we lose our EGC status before the end of that five-year period, we will be required to comply with all the reporting requirements applicable to other public companies including, but not limited to, the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive as we continue to rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result of any choices to reduce future disclosure, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may decline or be more volatile.

Under Section 107(b) of the JOBS Act, EGCs can delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have irrevocably elected not to avail our company of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, we will be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not EGCs.

We identified material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting. We will continue to incur costs to remediate these weaknesses and to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting. If we are unable to remediate these material weaknesses, and if additional material weaknesses are identified in the future, our business, results of operations and investors’ confidence in us could be materially affected.

In the course of preparing our consolidated financial statements for the periods ended June 30, 2016 and September 30, 2016, we identified material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting. Specifically, we determined that the design and operation of controls related to the classification in the statements of cash flows and the revenue recognition process were inadequate. More specifically our controls over the review of underlying schedules supporting the preparation of our cash flow statement and determination of revenue did not operate at a level of precision to identify errors. For a further discussion of our internal control over financial reporting and a description of the identified material weaknesses, see Part I, Item 4. Controls and Procedures. Although management has implemented a remediation plan to address these material weaknesses, and has remediated controls related to the statements of cash flows as of December 31, 2016, there can be no assurance that such remediation efforts will be successful or that our internal control over financial reporting will be effective as a result of these efforts. In addition, we may in the future identify additional internal control deficiencies that could rise to the level of a material weakness or uncover errors in financial reporting.

Our remediation efforts related to revenue recognition are in process and have not yet been completed. Because of this material weakness, there is heightened risk that (1) our management might not be able to certify, and our independent registered public accounting firm might not be able to report on, the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, which would cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, and (2) a material misstatement of our annual or quarterly financial statements may not be 59

58Our remediation efforts related to revenue recognition are in process and have not yet been completed. Because of this material weakness, there is heightened risk that (1) our management might not be able to certify, and our independent registered public accounting firm might not be able to report on, the adequacy of our internal control over financial reporting, which would cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations, and (2) a material misstatement of our annual or quarterly financial statements may not be prevented or detected. In addition, the planned remediation steps we expect to take may not effectively remediate the revenue recognition material weakness, in which case our internal control over financial reporting would continue to be ineffective. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to complete our remedial actions successfully. In addition, it is possible that we will discover additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.

prevented or detected. In addition, the planned remediation steps we expect to take may not effectively remediate the revenue recognition material weakness, in which case our internal control over financial reporting would continue to be ineffective. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to complete our remedial actions successfully. In addition, it is possible that we will discover additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.

Under Sections 302 and 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, our management is required to make certain assessments and certifications regarding our disclosure controls and internal controls over financial reporting. In addition, we are required to disclose changes in our internal control and procedures on a quarterly basis. As an EGC, we are not required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 until the earlier of five years from our initial public offering date or the date we would cease to be an EGC as of December 31 of that year. At such time, our independent registered public accounting firm may issue a report that is adverse in the event that such firm is not satisfied with the level at which our internal control and procedures are documented, designed or operating. As a result, we may need to undertake various actions, such as implementing new internal controls and procedures and hiring additional accounting or internal audit staff. We have dedicated, and expect to continue to dedicate, significant management, financial and other resources in connection with our compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. The process of maintaining and evaluating the effectiveness of these controls is expensive, time-consuming and requires significant attention from our management and staff. During the course of our evaluation, we may identify areas requiring improvement and may be required to design enhanced processes and controls to address issues identified through this review. This could result in significant delays and costs to us and require us to divert substantial resources, including management time from other activities.

In addition, all internal control systems, no matter how well designed and operated, can only provide reasonable assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Because there are inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of control can provide absolute assurance, that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been or will be detected. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.

If we are unable to adequately remediate the revenue recognition material weakness, or comply or continue to comply with the foregoing obligations, it could subject us to a variety of administrative sanctions, including the suspension or delisting of our common stock from the New York Stock Exchange and the inability of registered broker-dealers to make a market in our common stock, which could reduce the market price of our common stock. In addition, ineffective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial and other information, which would likely have a negative effect on the trading price of shares of our common stock. In the event that we do not adequately remediate this material weakness, or if we fail to maintain proper and effective internal control and procedures in future periods, our business, results of operations and financial condition and our ability to run our business effectively could be adversely affected and investors could lose confidence in our financial reporting.

The adoption of a new revenue recognition standard in 2018 could affect our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our financial reporting obligations.

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued new revenue recognition rules under ASC 606. Under this new guidance, revenue is recognized when promised goods or services are transferred to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration that is expected to be received for those goods or services. The new guidance also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. This new guidance will be effective for us in the first quarter of 2018. We are currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, and we anticipate the new standard will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements. For a further discussion of this new guidance and the impact we anticipate it will have on our financial statements, see Part I, Item 1. Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements – Note 2.

In order to comply with the requirements of ASC 606 in the first quarter of 2018, we are continuing to update and enhance our internal accounting systems and our internal controls over financial reporting. If we are not successful in updating our policies, procedures, information systems and internal controls over financial reporting, the revenue that we recognize and the related disclosures that we provide under ASC 606 may not be complete or accurate, which could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our financial reporting obligations. Furthermore, the evaluation and implementation of ASC 606 has required additional

investments in 2017 and may require incremental resources and system configurations that could increase our operating costs in future periods. Any difficulties in implementing ASC 606 could cause us to fail to meet our financial reporting obligations, which could result in regulatory discipline, harm investors’ confidence in us, and adversely affect our stock price.

Our business is subject to changing regulations regarding corporate governance and public disclosure that will increase both our costs and the risk of noncompliance.

As a public company, we are subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange. Achieving and maintaining compliance with these rules and regulations, particularly after we cease to be an emerging growth company, has increased and may further increase our legal, accounting and financial compliance costs, has made and may further make some activities more difficult, time-consuming and costly and may also place undue strain on our personnel, systems and resources.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires, among other things, that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting. Any failure to develop or maintain effective controls, or any difficulties encountered in their implementation or improvement, could harm our operating results or cause us to fail to meet our reporting obligations and may result in a restatement of our prior period financial statements. Any failure to implement and maintain effective internal controls also could adversely affect the results of periodic management evaluations regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting that we are required to include in our periodic reports filed with the SEC under Section 404(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or the annual auditor attestation reports regarding effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting that we will be required to include in our annual reports filed with the SEC beginning for the year ending December 31, 2018, unless, under the JOBS Act, we meet certain criteria that would require such reports to be included prior to then, under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Ineffective disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting could also cause investors to lose confidence in our reported financial and other information, which would likely have a negative effect on the trading price of our common stock.

In order to maintain the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, we will need to continue to expend significant resources and provide significant management oversight. We are in the process of implementing appropriate business processes, documenting our system of internal control over relevant processes, assessing their design, remediating any deficiencies identified and testing their operation. As a result, management’s attention may be diverted from other business concerns, which could harm our business, operating results and financial condition. These efforts will also involve substantial accounting-related costs. In addition, if we are unable to continue to meet these requirements, we may not be able to remain listed on the New York Stock Exchange.

Implementing any appropriate changes to our internal controls may require specific compliance training of our directors, officers and employees, entail substantial costs in order to modify our existing accounting systems, and take a significant period of time to complete. Such changes may not, however, be effective in maintaining the adequacy of our internal controls, and any failure to maintain that adequacy, or consequent inability to produce accurate financial statements on a timely basis, could increase our operating costs and could materially impair our ability to operate our business. In the event that our internal controls are perceived as inadequate or that we are unable to produce timely or accurate financial statements, investors may lose confidence in our operating results and our stock price could decline.

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange make it difficult and expensive for us to maintain directors’ and officers’ liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to maintain or increase coverage. If we are unable to maintain adequate directors’ and officers’ insurance, our ability to recruit and retain qualified directors, especially those directors who may be considered independent for purposes of the New York Stock Exchange rules, and officers may be curtailed.

The effects of regulations relating to the source of materials used in the manufacture of our products may adversely affect our business.

The SEC has recently adopted regulations concerning the supply of certain minerals, known as conflict minerals, originating from the conflict zones of the Democratic Republic of Congo, or DRC, and adjoining countries. These regulations require us to determine the origin of certain materials used in our products and disclose whether we use any materials containing conflict minerals originating from the DRC and adjoining countries. Since our supply chain is complex, we may face reputational harm if our customers or other stakeholders conclude that we are unable to verify sufficiently the origins of the minerals used in the products we sell. If it is determined that our products do contain or use any conflict minerals from the DRC or adjoining countries, additional requirements will be triggered. Compliance with these regulations may results in increased costs of regulatory compliance, potential risks to our reputation, difficulty satisfying any customers that insist on conflict-free products, and harm to our business.

We may not be able to secure additional financing on favorable terms, or at all, to meet our future capital needs.

In the future we may require additional capital to respond to business opportunities, challenges, acquisitions or unforeseen circumstances and may determine to engage in equity or debt financings, replace our current line of credit, or enter into new credit facilities for other reasons. We may not be able to timely secure additional debt or equity financing on favorable terms, or at all. Any debt financing obtained by us in the future could involve restrictive covenants relating to our capital raising activities and other financial and operational matters, which may make it more difficult for us to obtain additional capital and to pursue business opportunities, including potential acquisitions. If we raise additional funds through further issuances of equity, convertible debt securities or other securities convertible into equity, our existing stockholders could suffer significant dilution in their percentage ownership of our company, and any new equity securities we issue could have rights, preferences and privileges senior to those of holders of our common stock. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing or financing on terms satisfactory to us, when we require it, our ability to continue to grow or support our business and to respond to business challenges could be significantly limited.

Our investment portfolio may become impaired by deterioration of the capital markets.

Our cash, cash equivalent and short-term investment portfolio as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2017 consisted of $~~116~~117.68 million of money market mutual funds, highly liquid debt instruments of the U.S. government and its agencies, and U.S. and foreign corporate debt securities. Should financial market conditions worsen in the future, investments in some financial instruments may pose risks arising from market liquidity and credit concerns. In addition, any deterioration of the capital markets could cause our other income and expense to vary from expectations. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2017, we had no impairment charges associated with our short-term investment portfolio, and although we believe our current investment portfolio has little risk of material impairment, we cannot predict future market conditions or market liquidity, or credit availability, and can provide no assurance that our investment portfolio will remain materially unimpaired.

We may not be able to utilize a significant portion of our net operating loss or research tax credit carryforwards, which could adversely affect our operating results.

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2017, we had federal and state net operating loss carryforwards due to prior period losses, which if not utilized will begin to expire in 2028 and 2018 for federal and state purposes, respectively. We also have federal research tax credit carryforwards that will begin to expire in 2024, as well as state research tax credit carryforwards that have no expiration date. Realization of these net operating loss and research tax credit carryforwards is dependent upon future income, and there is a risk that our existing federal and state net operating loss carryforwards and federal research tax credit carryforwards could expire unused and be unavailable to offset future income tax liabilities, which could adversely affect our results.

In addition, under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, our ability to utilize net operating loss carryforwards or other tax attributes, such as research tax credits, in any taxable year may be limited if we experience an “ownership change.” A Section 382 “ownership change” generally occurs if one or more stockholders or groups of stockholders who own at least 5% of our stock increase their ownership by more than 50 percentage points over their lowest ownership percentage within a rolling three-year period. Similar rules may apply under state tax laws. It is possible that an ownership change, or any future ownership change, could have a material effect on the use of our net operating loss carryforwards or other tax attributes, which could adversely affect our operating results.

Our business and financial performance could be negatively impacted by changes in tax laws or regulations.

New income, sales, use or other tax laws, statutes, rules, regulations or ordinances could be enacted at any time. Those enactments could adversely affect our domestic and international business operations, and our business and financial performance. Further, existing tax laws, statutes, rules, regulations or ordinances could be interpreted, changed, modified or applied adversely to us. These events could require us or our customers to pay additional tax amounts on a prospective or retroactive basis, as well as require us or our customers to pay fines and/or penalties and interest for past amounts deemed to be due. If we raise our prices to offset the costs of these changes, existing and potential future customers may elect not to continue or purchase our products and services in the future. Additionally, new, changed, modified or newly interpreted or applied tax laws could increase our customers’ and our compliance, operating and other costs, as well as the costs of our products. Further, these events could decrease the capital we have available to operate our business. Any or all of these events could adversely impact our business and financial performance.

Our stock price has been and may continue to be volatile and may decline regardless of our operating performance.

There has not been a long history of a public market for our common stock, and an active or liquid market in our common stock may not be sustainable. The trading prices of the securities of technology companies have been highly volatile, and the trading price of our common stock has been and may continue to be volatile. The market price of our common stock has in the past and may in the future fluctuate significantly in response to numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:

our common stock has been and may continue to be volatile. The market price of our common stock has in the past and may in the future fluctuate significantly in response to numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control, including:

•

actual or anticipated fluctuations in our revenue, billings and other operating results or our total backlog;

•

the financial projections we may provide to the public, any changes in these projections or our failure to meet these projections;

•

delays in regulatory approvals for our customers and customer deployments;

•

failure of securities analysts to initiate or maintain coverage of us, changes in financial estimates by any securities analysts who follow our company, our failure to meet these estimates or the expectations of investors, or the publishing inaccurate or unfavorable research about our business by securities analysts;

•

ratings changes by any securities analysts who follow our company;

•

announcements by us or our competitors of significant customer wins, technical innovations, acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;

•

changes in operating performance and stock market valuations of our customers, technology companies generally, or those in our industry in particular;

•

political and consumer sentiment, including concerns over accuracy of advanced metering technology, economic impact on consumers, privacy, security, consumer choice and the safety, health and environmental aspects of smart grid, smart city, and broader IoT technology;

•

price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market, including as a result of trends in the economy as a whole;

•

lawsuits threatened or filed against us; and

•

other events or factors, including those resulting from war, incidents of terrorism or responses to these events.

In addition, the stock markets, and in particular the New York Stock Exchange on which our common stock is listed, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many technology companies. Stock prices of many technology companies have fluctuated in a manner unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of those companies. During the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2017, the closing price of our common stock on the New York Stock Exchange ranged from $109.4982 to $1411.0468 per share. In the past, stockholders have instituted securities class action litigation against other companies following periods of market volatility. If we were to become involved in securities litigation, it could subject us to substantial costs, divert resources and the attention of management from our business and adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.

If there are substantial sales of shares of our common stock, the price of our common stock could decline.

Sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock in the public market, or the perception that these sales might occur, could depress the market price of our common stock and may make it more difficult for you to sell your common stock at a time and price that you deem appropriate. We are unable to predict the effect that sales may have on the prevailing market price of our common stock. Any sales of securities by existing stockholders could adversely affect the trading price of our common stock.

Our directors, executive officers and their respective affiliates have substantial control over us and could delay or prevent a change in corporate control.

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2017, our directors, executive officers and their respective affiliates beneficially owned in the aggregate 25.21% of our outstanding shares of common stock. As a result, these stockholders, acting together, would likely have the ability to significantly influence the outcome of matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election of directors and other significant matters such as a merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets. In addition, these stockholders, acting together, would likely have the ability to significantly influence the management and affairs of our company. Accordingly, this concentration of ownership might harm the market price of our common stock by:

•

delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of us;

•

impeding a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination involving us; or

•

discouraging a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us.

We do not intend to pay dividends for the foreseeable future.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings to finance the operation and expansion of our business, and we do not expect to declare or pay any dividends in the foreseeable future. In addition, the terms of our credit facility with Silicon Valley Bank currently restricts our ability to pay dividends. As a result, you may only receive a return on your investment in our common stock if the market price of our common stock increases.

Delaware law and provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws could make a merger, tender offer or proxy contest difficult, thereby depressing the trading price of our common stock.

We are a Delaware corporation and the anti-takeover provisions of the Delaware General Corporation Law may discourage, delay or prevent a change in control by prohibiting us from engaging in a business combination with an interested stockholder for a period of three years after the person becomes an interested stockholder, even if a change of control would be beneficial to our existing stockholders. In addition, our restated certificate of incorporation and restated bylaws contain provisions that may make the acquisition of our company more difficult without the approval of our Board of Directors, including the following:

•

our Board of Directors is classified into three classes of directors with staggered three-year terms;

• only our Chairman of the Board, our lead independent director, our CEO, our President or a majority of our Board of Directors is authorized to call a special meeting of stockholders;

•

our stockholders are only able to take action at a meeting of stockholders and not by written consent;

•

vacancies on our Board of Directors are able to be filled only by our Board of Directors and not by stockholders;

•

directors may be removed from office only for cause;

•

our restated certificate of incorporation authorizes undesignated preferred stock, the terms of which may be established, and shares of which may be issued, without stockholder approval; and

•

advance notice procedures apply for stockholders to nominate candidates for election as directors or to bring matters before an annual meeting of stockholders.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

(a) Sales of Unregistered Securities

Not applicable.

(b) Use of Proceeds

Not applicable.

Item 3.

Defaults upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5.

Other Information

Not applicable.

6364

Item 6.

Exhibits.

Incorporated by Reference

Filed

Number

Description of Exhibit

Form

File No.

Exhibit

Filing Date

Herewith

10.1‡

Offer Letter Employment Agreement, dated March 2, 2017, between the Company and Catriona Fallon.

31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2*

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

‡ Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

As contemplated by SEC Release No. 33-8212, the certifications attached as Exhibit 32.1 and Exhibit 32.2 are furnished with this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and are not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not incorporated by reference in any filing of Silver Spring Networks, Inc. under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in such filings.

6465

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of San Jose, State of California, on ~~May~~August 109, 2017.

		SILVER SPRING NETWORKS, INC.

By:	/s/ Michael Bell
	Michael Bell President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

By:	/s/ Catriona M. Fallon
	Catriona M. Fallon Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

6566

EXHIBIT INDEX

Incorporated by Reference

Filed

Number

Description of Exhibit

Form

File No.

Exhibit

Filing Date

Herewith

31.1

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Exchange Act, as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1*

Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2*

Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

Filing Compare · Itron Networked Solutions, Inc.