UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 000-50246

ATLAS AMERICA PUBLIC #11-2002 LTD.

(Name of small business issuer in its charter)

Delaware		02-0600231
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

Park Place Corporate Center One 1000 Commerce Drive, 4th Floor Pittsburgh, PA		15275
(Address of principal executive offices)		(zip code)

Issuer’s telephone number, including area code: (412)-489-0006

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”,” “accelerated filer,” “non accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨

Non-accelerated filer	¨	Smaller reporting company	x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

ATLAS AMERICA PUBLIC #11-2002 LTD.

(A Delaware Limited Partnership)

INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT

ON FORM 10-Q

		PAGE
PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Unaudited)
Item 1:
	Condensed Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014	3
	Condensed Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015	3
	Condensed Statements of Operations for the Three and Nine Months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014	4
	Condensed Statements of Operations for the Three Months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015	4
	Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the Three and Nine Months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014	5
	Condensed Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the Three Months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015	5
	Condensed Statement of Changes in Partners’ Deficit for the Nine Months ended September 30, 2015	6
	Condensed Statement of Changes in Partners’ Deficit for the Three Months ended March 31, 2016	6
	Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014	7
	Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015	7
	Notes to Condensed Financial Statements	8
Item 2:	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	13
Item 4:	Controls and Procedures	2216
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1:	Legal Proceedings	2217
Item 6:	Exhibits	2318
SIGNATURES		2419
CERTIFICATIONS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ATLAS AMERICA PUBLIC #11-2002 LTD.

CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

	September 30,2015			December 31,2014
	March 31,2016			December 31,2015
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash	$	-		$	-
Accounts receivable trade–affiliate		4238,~~000~~800			7437,~~800~~900
Asset retirement receivable-affiliate		222,700			24,700
Current portion of derivative assets		16,500			19,900
Current portion of derivative assets		11,500			8,600
Total current assets		55,300			57,800
Total current assets		276,200			108,100
Gas and oil properties, net		1,537,200			1,537,200
Gas and oil properties, net		1,537,200			1,763,100
Long-term asset retirement receivable-affiliate		420,700			321,700
Long-term derivative assets		2,500			7,100
Total assets	$	2,013,200		$	1,916,700
	$	1,815,900		$	1,878,300
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ DEFICIT
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable trade-affiliate	$	~~387~~753,~~700~~000		$	-579,100
Accrued liabilities		1215,~~700~~600			10,~~000~~100
Current portion of put premiums payable-affiliate		6,100			5,500
Put premiums payable-affiliate		6,600			9,200
Total current liabilities		~~406~~775,~~500~~200			15598,~~500~~400
Asset retirement obligations		4,~~069~~162,~~000~~500			34,~~901~~124,~~600~~800
Long-term put premiums payable-affiliate		1,600			6,300
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)
Commitments and contingencies
Partners’ deficit:
Managing general partner’s deficit		(1,~~342~~437,~~200~~700	)		(1,~~097~~395,~~800~~500	)
Limited partners’ deficit (3,126.55 units)		(1,~~320~~487,400	)		(~~951~~1,~~200~~411,900	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		~~1,400~~600			3,900
Total partners’ deficit		(2,~~661~~924,~~200~~500	)		(2,~~045~~806,~~100~~500	)
	$	1,815,900		$	1,878,300
Total liabilities and partners’ deficit	$	2,013,200		$	1,916,700

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

ATLAS AMERICA PUBLIC #11-2002 LTD.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

	Three Months EndedSeptember 30,								Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
		Three Months Ended
	2015				2014				2015			2014
		March 31,
REVENUES
		2016				2015
Natural gas, oil and liquids	$	61,700			$	153,000			$	280,300		$	755,400
REVENUES
Gain on mark-to-market derivatives		6,100				-				6,300			-
Natural gas, oil and liquids		$	64,600			$	123,700
Total revenues		67,800				153,000				286,600			755,400
Gain on mark-to-market derivatives			2,900				2,500
COSTS AND EXPENSES
Total revenues			67,500				126,200
Production		111,700				160,700				402,200			521,200
COSTS AND EXPENSES
Depletion		3,900				10,400				12,000			31,100
Production			114,300				162,000
Impairment		213,900				-				213,900			-
Depletion			-				3,600
Accretion of asset retirement obligation		55,800				37,600				167,400			112,900
Accretion of asset retirement obligations			37,700				55,800
General and administrative		~~31,300~~	33,200			~~37,500~~	39,600			~~104,700~~			~~107,800~~
Total costs and expenses		~~416,600~~	185,200			~~246,200~~	261,000			~~900,200~~			~~773,000~~
Net loss	$	~~(348,800~~$	)(117,700	)	$	~~(93,200~~$	)(134,800	)	$	~~(613,600~~	)	$	~~(17,600~~	)
Allocation of net loss:
Managing general partner	$	~~(149,300~~$	)(42,200	)	$	~~(33,400~~$	)(49,000	)	$	~~(244,400~~	)	$	~~(8,300~~	)
Limited partners	$	~~(199,500~~$	)(75,500	)	$	~~(59,800~~$	)(85,800	)	$	~~(369,200~~	)	$	~~(9,300~~	)
Net loss per limited partnership unit	$	~~(64~~$	)(24	)	$	~~(19~~$	)(27	)	$	~~(118~~	)	$	(3	)

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

ATLAS AMERICA PUBLIC #11-2002 LTD.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(Unaudited)

	Three Months EndedSeptember 30,								Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
		Three Months EndedMarch 31,
	2015				2014				2015			2014
		2016				2015
Net loss	$	~~(348,800~~$	)(117,700	)	$	~~(93,200~~$	)(134,800	)	$	~~(613,600~~	)	$	~~(17,600~~	)
Other comprehensive (loss) income:
Other comprehensive loss:
Unrealized holding gain (loss) on cash flow hedging contracts		-				3,000				-			(5,500	)
Difference in estimated hedge receivable			-				1,600
Difference in estimated hedge gains receivable		(2,400	)			(400	)			300			15,200
Reclassification adjustment to net loss of mark-to-market gains on cash flow hedges			(300	)			(2,300	)
Reclassification adjustment for losses (gains) realized in net loss from cash flow hedges		1,600				100				(2,800	)		(6,700	)
Total other comprehensive loss			(300	)			(700	)
Total other comprehensive (loss) income		(800	)			2,700				(2,500	)		3,000
Comprehensive loss		$	(118,000	)		$	(135,500	)
Comprehensive loss	$	(349,600	)		$	(90,500	)		$	(616,100	)	$	(14,600	)

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

ATLAS AMERICA PUBLIC #11-2002 LTD.

CONDENSED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS’ DEFICIT

FOR THE ~~NINE~~THREE MONTHS ENDED

~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016

(Unaudited)

	ManagingGeneralPartner			LimitedPartners			Accumulated OtherComprehensiveIncome (Loss)			Total
Balance at December 31, 2014	$	(1,097,800	)	$	(951,200	)	$	3,900		$	(2,045,100	)
Balance at December 31, 2015	$	(1,395,500	)	$	(1,411,900	)	$	900		$	(2,806,500	)
Participation in revenues, costs and expenses:
Net production expenses		(4317,400	)		(7832,~~500~~300	)		-			(~~121~~49,~~900~~700	)
Gain on mark-to-market derivatives		-			62,~~300~~900			-			62,~~300~~900
Depletion		(5,600	)		(6,400	)		-			(12,000	)
Accretion of asset retirement obligations		(13,200	)		(24,500	)		-			(37,700	)
Impairment		(100,200	)		(113,700	)		-			(213,900	)
General and administrative		(11,600	)		(21,600	)		-			(33,200	)
Accretion of asset retirement obligation		(58,600	)		(108,800	)		-			(167,400	)
Net loss		(42,200	)		(75,500	)		-			(117,700	)
General and administrative		(36,600	)		(68,100	)		-			(104,700	)
Other comprehensive loss		-			-			(300	)		(300	)
Net loss		(244,400	)		(369,200	)		-			(613,600	)
Balance at March 31, 2016	$	(1,437,700	)	$	(1,487,400	)	$	600		$	(2,924,500	)
Other comprehensive loss		-			-			(2,500	)		(2,500	)
Balance at September 30, 2015	$	(1,342,200	)	$	(1,320,400	)	$	1,400		$	(2,661,200	)

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

ATLAS AMERICA PUBLIC #11-2002 LTD.

CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
	Three Months EndedMarch 31,
	2015			2014
	2016			2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(~~613~~117,~~600~~700	)	$	(17134,~~600~~800	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depletion		~~12,000~~-			313,~~100~~600
Impairment		213,900			-
Non-cash loss (gain) on derivative value, net		500			(3,300	)
Non-cash (gain) loss on derivative value, net		(4,900	)		11,500
Accretion of asset retirement obligations		37,700			55,800
Accretion of asset retirement obligation		167,400			112,900
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease in accounts receivable-affiliate		32,800			44,500
(Increase) decrease in accounts receivable trade-affiliate		(900	)		74,800
Increase in asset retirement receivable-affiliate		(~~198~~99,000	)		~~(24,700~~-	)
Increase in accounts payable trade-affiliate		~~387~~173,~~700~~900			-1,300
Increase (decrease) in accrued liabilities		2,700			(300	)
Increase in accrued liabilities		5,500			2,600
Asset retirement obligations settled		-			(300	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		-			-
Net cash provided by operating activities		-			157,100
Cash flows from investing activities:
Net cash used in investing activities		-			-
Cash flows from financing activities:
Distributions to partners		-			(202,500	)
Net cash used in financing activities		-			-
Net cash used in financing activities		-			(202,500	)
Net change in cash		-			-
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		-			(45,400	)
Cash at beginning of period		-			-
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		-			56,600
Cash at end of period	$	-		$	-
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	-		$	11,200

See accompanying notes to condensed financial statements.

ATLAS AMERICA PUBLIC #11 LTD.

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 - DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Atlas America Public #11-2002 LTD. (the “Partnership”) is a Delaware limited partnership, formed on June 5, 2002 with Atlas Resources, LLC serving as its Managing General Partner and Operator (“Atlas Resources” or the “MGP”). Atlas Resources is an indirect subsidiary of Atlas Resource Partners, L.P. (“ARP”) (NYSE: ARP). Unless the context otherwise requires, references to “the Partnership,” “we,” “us” and “our”, refer to Atlas America Public #11-2002 LTD.

~~On February 27, 2015, the MGP’s ultimate parent,~~ Atlas Energy, L.P. (“Atlas Energy”), which was a publicly traded master-limited partnership, was acquired by Targa Resources Corp. and distributed to Atlas Energy’s unitholders 100% of the limited liability company interests in ARP’s general partner, Atlas Energy Group, LLC (“Atlas Energy Group”; ~~NYSE~~OTCQX: ATLS). ~~Atlas~~manages ~~Energy Group became a separate, publicly traded company and the ultimate parent of the MGP as a result of the distribution. Following the distribution, Atlas Energy Group continues to manage~~ ARP’s operations and activities through its ownership of ARP’s general partner interest.

The Partnership has drilled and currently operates wells located in Pennsylvania and Ohio. The Partnership has no employees and relies on the MGP for management, which in turn, relies on its parent company, Atlas Energy Group ~~(February 27~~, ~~2015 and prior, Atlas Energy),~~ for administrative services.

The Partnership’s operating cash flows are generated from its wells, which produce natural gas, oil and ~~oil~~NGL. Produced natural gas, oil and ~~oil~~NGL is then delivered to market through affiliated and/or third-party gas gathering systems. The Partnership intends to produce its wells until they are depleted or become uneconomical to produce, at which time they will be plugged and abandoned or sold. The Partnership does not expect to drill additional wells and expects no additional funds will be required for drilling.

The accompanying condensed financial statements, which are unaudited except that the balance sheet at December 31, 2014 is derived from audited financial statements, are presented in accordance with the requirements of Form 10-Q and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim reporting. They do not include all disclosures normally made in financial statements contained in the Partnership’s Form 10-K. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto presented in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 may not necessarily be indicative of the results of operations for the full year ended December 31, 2015.

The economic viability of the Partnership’s production is based on a variety of factors including proved developed reserves that it can expect to recover through existing wells with existing equipment and operating methods or in which the cost of additional required extraction equipment is relatively minor compared to the cost of a new well; and through currently installed extraction equipment and related infrastructure which is operational at the time of the reserves estimate (if the extraction is by means not involving drilling, completing or reworking a well). There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proven reserves and in projecting future net revenues.

The prices at which the Partnership’s natural gas, oil and ~~oil~~NGL will be sold are uncertain and the Partnership is not guaranteed a specific ~~natural gas~~ price for the sale of its ~~natural gas~~ production. Changes in natural gas, oil and ~~oil~~NGL prices have a significant impact on the Partnership’s cash flow and the value of its reserves. Lower natural gas, oil and ~~oil~~NGL prices may not only decrease the Partnership’s revenues, but also may reduce the amount of natural gas, oil and ~~oil~~NGL that the Partnership can produce economically.

~~Historically,~~Liquidity ~~there has been no need to borrow funds from the MGP to fund operations as the amount of funds generated by the Partnership’s operations has been adequate to fund future operations~~ and ~~distributions~~Capital toResources the partners. However, recent declines in commodity prices may challenge the Partnership’s ability to pay its obligations as they become due and its intention to produce its wells until they are depleted, as they may become uneconomical to produce. Accordingly, the MGP determined that there is substantial doubt about the Partnership’s ability to continue as a going concern. The MGP has planned, as necessary, to continue the Partnership’s operations and to fund the Partnership’s operations for at least the next 12 months. The MGP has concluded that such undertaking is sufficient to alleviate the doubt as to the Partnership’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Partnership is generally limited to the amount of funds generated by the cash flow from its operations to fund its obligations and make distributions, if any, to its partners.

The natural gas, oil and natural gas liquids commodity price markets have suffered significant declines throughout 2015 and have continued to decline and remain low in 2016. The extreme ongoing volatility in the energy industry and commodity prices will likely continue to impact the Partnership’s outlook. The Partnership has experienced downward revisions of its natural gas and oil reserves volumes and values due to the significant declines in commodity prices. The MGP continues to implement various cost saving measures to reduce the Partnership’s operating and general and administrative costs, including renegotiating contracts with contractors, suppliers and service providers, reducing the number of staff and contractors and deferring and eliminating discretionary costs. The MGP will continue to be opportunistic and aggressive in managing the Partnership’s cost structure and, in turn, liquidity to meet its operating needs. To the extent commodity prices remain low or decline further, or the Partnership experiences other disruptions in the industry, the Partnership’s ability to fund its operations and make distributions may be further impacted, and could result in the MGP’s decision to liquidate the Partnership’s operations.

Historically, there has been no need to borrow funds from the MGP to fund operations as the cash flow from the Partnership’s operations have been adequate to fund its obligations and distributions to its partners. However, the recent significant declines in commodity prices have challenged the Partnership’s ability to fund its operations and may make it uneconomical for the Partnership to produce its wells until they are depleted as the Partnership originally intended. Accordingly, the MGP determined that there is substantial doubt about the Partnership’s ability to continue as a going concern. The MGP intends, as necessary, to continue the Partnership’s operations and to fund the Partnership’s obligations for at least the next twelve months. The MGP has concluded that such undertaking is sufficient to alleviate the doubt as to the Partnership’s ability to continue as a going concern. To the extent commodity prices remain low or decline further, ARP experiences disruptions in the financial markets impacting its respective longer-term access to or cost of capital, or ARP experiences any of the other impacts to its liquidity discussed below, the MGP’s ability to continue the Partnership’s operations and to fund the Partnership’s obligations for at least the next twelve months, as necessary, may be impacted.

ARP’s revolving credit facility is currently in the process of its semi-annual redetermination. Based on projected market conditions, continued declines in commodity prices and recent conversations with its administrative agent, ARP expects that its borrowing base will be redetermined to a level below its outstanding borrowings as of March 31, 2016. If ARP’s borrowing base is redetermined below its current outstanding borrowings and ARP is unable to repay the deficiency or deposit additional collateral to eliminate such deficiency, or if ARP experiences any other event of default on its debt obligations, or if other debt agreements cross-default, and the lenders accelerate the maturity of any other outstanding debts, the MGP, may not have sufficient liquidity to continue the Partnership’s operations and to fund the Partnership’s obligations, and as a result, there would be substantial doubt regarding the Partnership’s ability to continue as a going concern.

If, however, the MGP were to decide to liquidate our operations, the liquidation valuation of the Partnership’s assets and liabilities would be determined by an independent expert. It is possible that based on such determination, we would not be able to make any liquidation distributions to our limited partners. A liquidation could result in the transfer of the post-liquidation assets and liabilities of the Partnership to the MGP and would occur without any further contributions from or distributions to the limited partners.

The condensed financial statements, which are unaudited, except for the balance sheet at December 31, 2015, which is derived from audited financial statements, have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim reporting. Certain information and note disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to those rules and regulations, although we believe that the disclosures made are adequate to make the information not misleading. These interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto presented in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2016 may not necessarily be indicative of the results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2016.

NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

In management’s opinion, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the Partnership’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods disclosed have been made. Management has considered for disclosure any material subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued.

In addition to matters discussed further in this note, the Partnership’s significant accounting policies are detailed in its audited financial statements and notes thereto in the Partnership’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the Partnership’s financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities that exist at the date of the Partnership’s financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and costs and expenses during the reporting periods. The Partnership’s financial statements are based on a number of significant estimates, including the revenue and expense accruals, depletion, ~~asset~~ impairments, fair value of derivative instruments and the probability of forecasted transactions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

The natural gas industry principally conducts its business by processing actual transactions as many as 60 days after the month of delivery. Consequently, the most recent two months’ financial results were recorded using estimated volumes and contract market prices. Differences between estimated and actual amounts are recorded in the following months’ financial results. Management believes that the operating results presented for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 represent actual results in all material respects (See “-Revenue Recognition”).

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable on the balance sheets consist solely of the trade accounts receivable associated with the Partnership’s operations. In evaluating the realizability of the Partnership’s accounts receivable, the MGP performs ongoing credit evaluations of the Partnership’s customers and adjusts credit limits based upon payment history and the customers’ current creditworthiness, as determined by review of such customers’ credit information. Credit is extended on an unsecured basis to many of the Partnership’s energy customers. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the MGP’s credit evaluation indicated that the Partnership had no need for an allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable.

Gas and Oil Properties

Gas and oil properties are stated at cost. Maintenance and repairs that generally do not extend the useful life of an asset for two years or more through the replacement of critical components are expensed as incurred. Major renewals and improvements that generally extend the useful life of an asset for two years or more through the replacement of critical components are capitalized.

The Partnership follows the successful efforts method of accounting for gas and oil producing activities. Oil and natural gas liquids (“NGLs”) are converted to gas equivalent basis (“Mcfe”) at the rate of one barrel of oil to six Mcf of natural gas. Mcf is defined as one thousand cubic feet.

The Partnership’s depletion expense is determined on a field-by-field basis using the units-of-production method. Depletion rates for lease, well and related equipment costs are based on proved developed reserves associated with each field. Depletion rates are determined based on reserve quantity estimates and the capitalized cost of developed producing properties. The Partnership recorded depletion expense on natural gas and oil properties of $12,000 and $31,100 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

~~Upon~~The ~~the~~natural ~~sale~~gas orindustry ~~retirement~~principally ofconducts aits ~~complete~~business ~~field~~by ofprocessing aactual ~~proved~~transactions ~~property,~~as ~~the~~many ~~cost~~as is60 ~~eliminated~~days ~~from~~after the ~~property~~month ~~accounts~~of ~~and~~delivery. Consequently, the ~~resultant~~most ~~gain~~recent ortwo ~~loss~~months’ isfinancial ~~reclassified~~results towere ~~the~~recorded ~~Partnership’s~~using ~~statements~~estimated ofvolumes ~~operations~~and contract market prices. ~~Upon~~Differences between estimated and actual amounts are recorded in the ~~sale~~following ofmonths’ anfinancial ~~individual~~results. ~~well,~~Management believes that the ~~Partnership~~operating ~~credits~~results presented for the ~~proceeds~~three tomonths ~~accumulated~~ended ~~depletion~~March ~~within~~31, ~~its~~2016 ~~balance~~and ~~sheets~~2015 represent actual results in all material respects.

Gas and Oil Properties

The following is a summary of gas and oil properties at the dates indicated:

	September 30,2015			December 31,2014
	March 31,2016			December 31,2015
Proved properties:
Leasehold interests	$	695,700		$	695,700
Wells and related equipment		41,887,000			41,887,000
Total natural gas and oil properties		42,582,700			42,582,700
Accumulated depletion and impairment		(41,045,500	)		(4041,~~819~~045,~~600~~500	)
Gas and oil properties, net	$	1,537,200		$	1,~~763~~537,~~100~~200

~~Impairment~~As a result of ~~Long-Lived~~the ~~Assets~~recent significant declines in commodity prices and associated recorded impairment charges, remaining net book value of gas and oil properties on our balance sheet at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was primarily related to the estimated salvage value of such properties. The estimated salvage values were based on the MGP’s historical experience in determining such values.

The Partnership reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If it is determined that an asset’s estimated future cash flows will not be sufficient to recover its carrying amount, an impairment charge will be recorded to reduce the carrying amount of that asset to its estimated fair value if such carrying amount exceeds the fair value.

The review of the Partnership’s gas and oil properties is done on a field-by-field basis by determining if the historical cost of proved properties less the applicable accumulated depletion and impairment is less than the estimated expected undiscounted future cash flows including salvage. The expected future cash flows are estimated based on the Partnership’s plans to continue to produce and develop proved reserves. Expected future cash flow from the sale of the production of reserves is calculated based on estimated future prices. The Partnership estimates prices based upon current contracts in place, adjusted for basis differentials and market related information, including published futures prices. The estimated future level of production is based on assumptions surrounding future prices and costs, field decline rates, market demand and supply and the economic and regulatory climates. If the carrying value exceeds the expected future cash flows, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between the estimated fair market value (as determined by the discounted cash flows) and the carrying value of the assets.

The determination of natural gas and oil reserve estimates is a subjective process and the accuracy of any reserve estimate depends on the quality of available data and the application of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. Estimates of economically recoverable reserves and future net cash flows depend on a number of variable factors and assumptions that are difficult to predict and may vary considerably from actual results.

In addition, reserve estimates for wells with limited or no production history are less reliable than those based on actual production. Estimated reserves are often subject to future revisions, which could be substantial, based on the availability of additional information which could cause the assumptions to be modified. The Partnership cannot predict what reserve revisions may be required in future periods.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Partnership recognized $213,900 of impairment related to gas and oil properties. There was no gas and oil properties impairment recorded for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014. The impairment relates to the carrying amount of these gas and oil properties being in excess of the Partnership’s estimate of their fair value at September 30, 2015. The estimate of the fair value of these gas and oil properties was impacted by, among other factors, the deterioration of natural gas and oil prices at the date of measurement.

Derivative Instruments

The Partnership’s MGP enters into certain financial contracts to manage the Partnership’s exposure to movement in commodity prices (See Note 4). The derivative instruments recorded on the balance sheets were measured as either an asset or liability at fair value. Changes in a derivative instrument’s fair value are recognized currently in the Partnership’s statements of operations unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. On January 1, 2015, the Partnership discontinued hedge accounting through de-designation for all of its existing commodity derivatives which were qualified as hedges. As such, subsequent changes in fair value after December 31, 2014 of these derivatives are recognized immediately within gain (loss) on mark-to-market derivatives in the Partnership’s statements of operations, while the fair values of the instruments recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as of December 31, 2014 will be reclassified to the statements of operations in the periods in which those respective derivative contracts settle. Prior to discontinuance of hedge accounting, the fair value of these commodity derivative instruments was recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) within partners’ capital on the Partnership’s balance sheets and reclassified to the Partnership’s statements of operations at the time the originally hedged physical transactions affected earnings.

Asset Retirement Obligations

The Partnership recognizes an estimated liability for the plugging and abandonment of its gas and oil wells (See Note 3). The Partnership recognizes a liability for its future asset retirement obligations in the current period if a reasonable estimate of the fair value of that liability can be made. The associated asset retirement costs are capitalized as part of the carrying amount of the long-lived asset. The Partnership also considers the estimated salvage value in the calculation of depletion.

Income Taxes

The Partnership is not subject to U.S. federal and most state income taxes. The partners of the Partnership are liable for income tax in regard to their distributive share of the Partnership’s taxable income. Such taxable income may vary substantially from net income reported in the accompanying financial statements. The federal and state income taxes related to the Partnership were immaterial to the financial statements and are recorded in pre-tax income on a current basis only. Accordingly, no federal or state deferred income tax has been provided for in the accompanying financial statements.

The Partnership evaluates tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Partnership’s tax returns and disallows the recognition of tax positions not deemed to meet a “more-likely-than-not” threshold of being sustained by the applicable tax authority. The Partnership’s MGP does not believe it has any tax positions taken within its financial statements that would not meet this threshold. The Partnership’s policy is to reflect interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions, when and if they become applicable. The Partnership has not recognized any potential interest or penalties in its financial statements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.

The Partnership files Partnership Returns of Income in the U.S. and various state jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Partnership is no longer subject to income tax examinations by major tax authorities for years prior to 2011. The Partnership is not currently being examined by any jurisdiction and is not aware of any potential examinations as of September 30, 2015.

Working Interest

The Partnership Agreement establishes that revenues and expenses will be allocated to the MGP and limited partners based on their ratio of capital contributions to total contributions (“working interest”). The MGP is also provided an additional working interest of 7% as provided in the Partnership Agreement. Due to the time necessary to complete drilling operations and accumulate all drilling costs, estimated working interest percentage ownership rates are utilized to allocate revenues and expenses until the wells are completely drilled and turned on-line into production. Once the wells are completed, the final working interest ownership of the partners is determined and any previously allocated revenues and expenses based on the estimated working interest percentage ownership are adjusted to conform to the final working interest percentage ownership.

Revenue Recognition

The Partnership generally sells natural gas, crude oil and NGLs at prevailing market prices. Typically, the Partnership’s sales contracts are based on pricing provisions that are tied to a market index, with certain fixed adjustments based on proximity to gathering and transmission lines and the quality of its natural gas. Generally, the market index is fixed two business days prior to the commencement of the production month. Revenue and the related accounts receivable are recognized when produced quantities are delivered to a custody transfer point, persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement exists, the rights and responsibility of ownership pass to the purchaser upon delivery, collection of revenue from the sale is reasonably assured and the sales price is fixed or determinable. Revenues from the production of natural gas, crude oil and NGLs, in which the Partnership has an interest with other producers, are recognized on the basis of its percentage ownership of the working interest and/or overriding royalty.

The MGP and its affiliates perform all administrative and management functions for the Partnership, including billing revenues and paying expenses. Accounts receivable trade-affiliate on the Partnership’s balance sheets includes the net production revenues due from the MGP. The Partnership accrues unbilled revenue due to timing differences between the delivery of natural gas, NGLs, crude oil and condensate and the receipt of a delivery statement. These revenues are recorded based upon volumetric data from the Partnership’s records and management estimates of the related commodity sales and transportation and compression fees, which are, in turn, based upon applicable product prices (See “-Use of Estimates”). During the quarter ended September 30, 2014, the Partnership identified an error in its revenue recognition process. As a result, the Partnership overestimated its June 30, 2014 unbilled revenues by $38,100. As a result, revenue and net income was overstated by $38,100 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014. In adjusting for the overstatement of revenue and net income that existed at June 30, 2014, the third quarter revenue is understated by $38,100 and net loss is overstated for the three month period ended September 30, 2014. In addition, there was no impact on Partnership distributions. Refer to the Partnership’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 for further explanation of this error. The Partnership had unbilled revenues at September 30, 2015 of $42,000 which was included in accounts receivable trade-affiliate within the Partnership’s balance sheets. The Partnership had unbilled revenues at December 31, 2014 of $101,700, which was offset by $26,900 of amounts due to the MGP, which was included in accounts receivable trade-affiliate within the Partnership’s balance sheets.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Comprehensive income (loss) includes net income (loss) and all other changes in the equity of a business during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources that, under U.S. GAAP, have not been recognized in the calculation of net income (loss). These changes, other than net income (loss), are referred to as “other comprehensive income (loss)” on the Partnership’s financial statements and, at September 30, 2015, only include changes in the fair value of unsettled derivative contracts which, prior to January 1, 2015, were accounted for as cash flow hedges (See Note 4). The Partnership does not have any other type of transaction which would be included within other comprehensive income (loss).

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In ~~January~~August ~~2015~~2014, the ~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (“~~FASB”) ~~issued~~updated ~~Accounting~~the ~~Standards~~accounting ~~Update~~guidance ~~(“ASU”)~~related ~~2015-01,~~to ~~Income~~the ~~Statement~~evaluation –of ~~Extraordinary~~whether ~~and~~there ~~Unusual~~is ~~Items~~substantial ~~(Subtopic~~doubt ~~225-20):~~about ~~Simplifying~~an ~~Income~~entity’s ~~Statement~~ability ~~Presentation~~to bycontinue ~~Eliminating~~as ~~the~~a ~~Concept~~going ~~of Extraordinary Items (“Update 2015-01”)~~concern. The ~~amendments~~updated inaccounting ~~Update~~guidance ~~2015-01~~requires ~~simplify~~an ~~the~~entity’s ~~income~~management ~~statement~~to ~~presentation~~evaluate ~~requirements~~whether inthere ~~Subtopic~~are ~~225-20~~conditions byor ~~eliminating~~events ~~the~~that ~~concept~~raise ofsubstantial ~~extraordinary~~doubt ~~items.~~about ~~Extraordinary~~its ~~items~~ability ~~are~~to ~~events~~continue ~~and~~as ~~transactions~~a ~~that~~going ~~are~~concern ~~distinguished~~within byone ~~their~~year ~~unusual~~from ~~nature~~the ~~and~~date by the ~~infrequency~~financial ofstatements ~~their occurrence. The amendments in Update 2015-01~~ are ~~effective~~issued ~~for fiscal years,~~ and ~~interim~~provide ~~periods~~footnote ~~within those fiscal years~~disclosures, ~~beginning~~if ~~after December 15, 2015~~necessary. AThe ~~reporting~~updated ~~entity~~guidance ~~may~~is ~~apply~~effective ~~the~~as ~~amendments~~of ~~prospectively.~~January A1, ~~reporting~~2017 ~~entity~~and ~~may also apply~~ the ~~amendments~~Partnership ~~retrospectively~~is tocurrently ~~all prior periods presented~~ in the ~~financial~~process ~~statements.~~of ~~Early~~determining ~~adoption is permitted provided that~~ the ~~guidance~~impact ~~is applied from the beginning~~ of ~~the~~providing ~~fiscal year of adoption. The Partnership will adopt~~ the ~~requirements~~enhanced ofdisclosures, ~~Update~~as ~~2015-01 upon its effective date of January 1~~applicable, ~~2016,~~within ~~and it does not anticipate it having a material impact on~~ its financial ~~position, results of operations or related disclosures~~statements.

In ~~August~~May 2014, the FASB ~~issued~~updated ~~ASU~~the ~~2014-15,~~accounting ~~Presentation~~guidance ofrelated ~~Financial~~to ~~Statements~~revenue ~~– Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) (“Update 2014-15”)~~recognition. The ~~amendments~~updated inaccounting ~~Update~~guidance ~~2014-15~~provides ~~provide~~a ~~U.S.~~single, ~~GAAP~~contract-based ~~guidance~~revenue onrecognition ~~the~~model ~~responsibility~~to ofhelp animprove ~~entity’s~~financial ~~management~~reporting inby ~~evaluating~~providing ~~whether~~clearer ~~there~~guidance ison ~~substantial~~when ~~doubt~~an ~~about the~~ entity’s ~~ability~~should torecognize ~~continue~~revenue, ~~as a going concern~~ and ~~about~~by ~~related~~reducing ~~footnote~~the ~~disclosures.~~number ~~For~~of ~~each~~standards ~~reporting~~to ~~period,~~which an entity’s ~~management~~has ~~will be required~~ to ~~evaluate whether there are conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern within one year from the date the financial statements are issued~~refer. In ~~doing~~July so2015, the ~~amendments~~FASB invoted ~~Update~~to ~~2014-15~~defer ~~should reduce diversity in~~ the ~~timing~~effective ~~and~~date ~~content~~by ofone ~~footnote~~year ~~disclosures.~~to ~~The amendments in Update 2014-~~December 15, ~~are~~2017 ~~effective~~ for ~~the~~ annual ~~period~~reporting ~~ending~~periods beginning after ~~December~~that ~~15,~~date. ~~2016,~~The ~~and~~updated ~~for~~accounting ~~annual~~guidance ~~and~~provides ~~interim~~companies ~~periods~~with ~~thereafter.~~alternative ~~Early~~methods ~~adoption~~of ~~is permitted~~adoption. The Partnership ~~will~~is ~~adopt~~currently in the ~~requirements~~process of ~~Update~~determining ~~2014-15~~the ~~upon~~impact ~~its~~that ~~effective~~the ~~date~~updated inaccounting ~~2016,~~guidance ~~and~~will ithave ~~does not anticipate it having a material impact~~ on its financial ~~position,~~statements ~~results~~and ofits ~~operations~~method orof ~~related disclosures~~adoption.

12NOTE 3 - DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

InThe ~~May 2014~~MGP, ~~the~~on ~~FASB~~behalf issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“Update 2014-09”), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements (and some cost guidance) in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and most industry-specific guidance throughout the industry topics of the ~~Accounting Standards Codification. In addition~~Partnership, ~~the~~uses ~~existing requirements for the recognition of~~ a ~~gain~~number ~~or loss on the transfer~~ of ~~nonfinancial~~different ~~assets~~derivative ~~that are not in a contract with a customer (for example~~instruments, ~~assets~~principally ~~within~~put ~~the scope of Topic 360~~contracts, Property, Plant and Equipment, and intangible assets within the scope of Topic 350, Intangibles – Goodwill and Other) are amended to be consistent with the guidance on recognition and measurement (including the constraint on revenue) in ~~Update~~connection 2014-09. Topic 606 requires an entity to recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. To achieve this, an entity should identify the contract with ~~a customer, identify~~ the ~~performance~~Partnership’s ~~obligations~~commodity ~~in the contract, determine the transaction~~ price, ~~allocate~~risk ~~the~~management ~~transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract and recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies the performance obligations~~activities. ~~These~~The ~~requirements~~Partnership ~~are~~does ~~effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. Early adoption is~~ not ~~permitted.~~apply Onhedge ~~July~~accounting ~~9, 2015, the FASB decided~~ to ~~defer~~any ~~the effective date~~ of ~~ASU~~its ~~2014-09~~derivative ~~by one year~~instruments. As a result, ~~public~~gains ~~entities would apply the new revenue standard to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017,~~ and tolosses ~~interim~~associated ~~periods within that reporting period,~~ with ~~the~~derivative ~~option~~instruments toare ~~adopt~~recognized ~~the~~in ~~standard as of the original effective date~~earnings. The Partnership will adopt the requirements of Update 2014-09 retrospectively upon its effective date of January 1, 2018, and is evaluating the impact of the adoption on its financial position, results of operations and related disclosures.

~~NOTE~~The ~~3—ASSET~~Partnership ~~RETIREMENT~~enters ~~OBLIGATIONS~~into commodity put contracts to achieve more predictable cash flows by hedging the Partnership’s exposure to changes in commodity prices. At any point in time, such contracts may include regulated NYMEX futures and options contracts and non-regulated over-the-counter futures contracts with qualified counterparties. NYMEX contracts are generally settled with offsetting positions, but may be settled by the physical delivery of the commodity. These contracts have been recorded at their fair values.

The estimated liability for asset retirement obligations was based on the MGP’s historical experience in plugging and abandoning wells, the estimated remaining lives of those wells based on reserve estimates, external estimates as to the cost to plug and abandon the wells in the future and federal and state regulatory requirements. The liability was discounted using an assumed credit-adjusted risk-free interest rate. Revisions to the liability could occur due to changes in estimates of plugging and abandonment costs or remaining lives of the wells or if federal or state regulators enact new plugging and abandonment requirements. The Partnership has no assets legally restricted for purposes of settling asset retirement obligations. Except for its gas and oil properties, the Partnership determined that there were no other material retirement obligations associated with tangible long-lived assets. 10

The ~~MGP’s~~Partnership ~~historical~~reflected ~~practice~~net ~~and~~derivative ~~continued~~assets ~~intention~~on isits tobalance ~~retain~~sheets ~~distributions from the limited partners as the wells within the Partnership near the end~~ of ~~their useful life. On a partnership-by-partnership basis~~$16,500 ~~the MGP assesses its right to withhold amounts related to plugging~~ and ~~abandonment costs based on several factors including commodity price trends~~$19,900 ~~the~~at ~~natural~~March ~~decline in the production of the wells and current and future costs. Generally~~31, ~~the~~2016 ~~MGP’s intention is to retain distributions from the limited partners as the fair value of the future cash flows of the limited partners’ interest approaches the fair value of the future plugging~~ and ~~abandonment~~December ~~cost. Upon the MGP’s decision to retain all future distributions to the limited partners of the Partnership~~31, ~~the MGP will assume the related asset retirement obligations of the limited partners. As of September 30,~~ 2015, ~~the MGP withheld $222,700 of net production revenue for future plugging and abandonment costs~~respectively.

A reconciliation of the Partnership’s liability for well plugging and abandonment costs for the periods indicated is as follows:

	Three Months EndedSeptember 30,				Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
	2015		2014		2015		2014
Asset retirement obligation at beginning of period	$	4,013,200	$	2,610,000	$	3,901,600	$	2,535,000
Accretion expense		55,800		37,600		167,400		112,900
Asset retirement obligations settled		-		-		-		(300	)
Asset retirement obligation at end of period	$	4,069,000	$	2,647,600	$	4,069,000	$	2,647,600

NOTE 4 - DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

The MGP, on behalf of the Partnership, uses a number of different derivative instruments, principally swaps, collars and options, in connection with the Partnership’s commodity price risk management activities. Management enters into financial instruments to hedge forecasted commodity sales against the variability in expected future cash flows attributable to changes in market prices. Swap instruments are contractual agreements between counterparties to exchange obligations of money as the underlying commodities are sold. Under commodity-based swap agreements, the Partnership receives or pays a fixed price and receives or remits a floating price based on certain indices for the relevant contract period. Commodity-based put option instruments are contractual agreements that require the payment of a premium and grant the purchaser of the put option the right, but not the obligation, to receive the difference between a fixed, or strike, price and a floating price based on certain indices for the relevant contract period, if the floating price is lower than the fixed price. The put option instrument sets a floor price for commodity sales being hedged. Costless collars are a combination of a purchased put option and a sold call option, in which the premiums net to zero. The costless collar eliminates the initial cost of the purchased put, but places a ceiling price for commodity sales being hedged.

The Partnership enters into derivative contracts with various financial institutions, utilizing master contracts based upon the standards set by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. These contracts allow for rights of offset at the time of settlement of the derivatives. Due to the right of offset, derivatives are recorded on the Partnership’s balance sheets as assets or liabilities at fair value on the basis of the net exposure to each counterparty. Potential credit risk adjustments are also analyzed based upon the net exposure to each counterparty. Premiums paid for purchased options are recorded on the Partnership’s balance sheets as the initial value of the options. The Partnership reflected net derivative assets on its balance sheets of $14,000 and $15,700 at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. As a result of the put options, the Partnership recorded a net deferred gain on its balance sheet in accumulated other comprehensive income of $1,400 as of September 30, 2015. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, $2,100 of net gains were recorded by the Partnership and allocated only to the limited partners. Of the $1,400 of deferred gains in accumulated other comprehensive income on the Partnership’s balance sheet at September 30, 2015, the Partnership will reclassify $1,300 of gains to its statement of operations over the next twelve month period as these contracts expire with the remaining gains of $100 being reclassified to the Partnership’s statements of operations in later periods as the remaining contracts expire.

The following table summarizes the gains or losses recognized within the statements of operations for derivative instruments previously designated as cash flow hedges for the periods indicated:

	Three Months EndedSeptember 30,						Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
		Three Months Ended
	2015			2014			2015		2014
		March 31,
(Loss) gain reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into natural gas and oil revenues	$	(1,600	)	$	(100	)	$	2,800	$	6,700
		2016			2015
Gain subsequent to December 31, 2014 recognized in gain on mark-to-market derivatives	$	6,100		$	-		$	6,300	$	-
Gains reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income into natural gas, oil and liquids revenues		$	300		$	2,300
Gains subsequent to hedge accounting recognized in gain on mark-to-market derivatives		$	2,900		$	2,500

~~The Partnership enters into commodity future option and collar contracts to achieve more predictable cash flows by hedging its exposure to changes in commodity prices.~~ At ~~any~~March ~~point in time~~31, such contracts may include regulated NYMEX futures and options contracts and non-regulated over-the-counter futures contracts with qualified counterparties. NYMEX contracts are generally settled with offsetting positions2016, ~~but may be settled by~~ the ~~physical~~Partnership ~~delivery~~had of the following commodity. derivatives:

At September 30, 2015, the Partnership had the following commodity derivatives:

Natural Gas Put Options

ProductionPeriod EndingDecember 31,	Volumes	AverageFixed Price		Fair ValueAsset (2)
	(MMBtu) (1)		(per MMBtu)(1)
2015	2,100	$	4.00	$	2,900
2016	8,600	$	4.15	$	16,500
2016	8,200		4.15		11,100
			Total net assets	$	14,000

(1)	“MMBtu” represents million British Thermal Units.

(2)	Fair value based on forward NYMEX natural gas prices, as applicable.

~~Put~~As ~~Premiums~~the ~~Payable~~underlying prices and terms in the Partnership’s derivative contracts were consistent with the indices used to sell its natural gas and oil, there were no gains or losses recognized during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 for hedge ineffectiveness.

~~During~~NOTE ~~June~~4 2012, a premium (“put premium”) was paid to purchase the contracts and will be allocated to natural gas production revenues generated over the contractual term of the purchased hedging instruments. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, $6,100 and $5,500, respectively, of the put premiums were recorded as short-~~term~~ ~~payables~~FAIR toVALUE ~~affiliate~~OF ~~and~~FINANCIAL ~~$1,600~~INSTRUMENTS ~~and $6,300, respectively, were recorded as long-term payables to affiliate.~~

~~NOTE~~The 5Partnership uses a market approach fair value methodology to value the assets and liabilities for its outstanding derivative contracts. The fair value of a financial instrument depends on a number of factors, including the availability of observable market data over the contractual term of the underlying instrument. The Partnership separates the fair value of its financial instruments into three levels (Levels 1, 2 and 3) based on its assessment of the availability of observable market data and the significance of non-observable ~~FAIR~~data ~~VALUE~~used OFto ~~FINANCIAL~~determine ~~INSTRUMENTS~~fair value. As of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, all derivative financial instruments were classified as Level 2.

~~The~~Information ~~Partnership~~for ~~has~~assets ~~established~~measured ~~a hierarchy to measure its financial instruments~~ at fair value, ~~which~~at ~~requires~~March it31, to2016 ~~maximize the use of observable inputs~~ and ~~minimize~~December ~~the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. Observable inputs represent market data obtained from independent sources~~31, ~~whereas~~2015 ~~unobservable~~was ~~inputs~~as reflect the Partnership’s own market assumptions, which are used if observable inputs are not reasonably available without undue cost and effort. The hierarchy defines three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair valuefollows:

Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical, unrestricted assets and liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
As of March 31, 2016
Derivative assets, gross
Commodity puts	$	-	$	16,500	$	-	$	16,500

Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset and liability or can be corroborated with observable market data for substantially the entire contractual term of the asset or liability.

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
As of December 31, 2015
Derivative assets, gross
Commodity puts	$	-	$	19,900	$	-	$	19,900

Level 3 – Unobservable inputs that reflect the entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions market participants would use in the pricing of the asset or liability and are consequently not based on market activity but rather through particular valuation techniques. 11

~~Assets~~NOTE ~~and~~5 ~~Liabilities~~- ~~Measured~~CERTAIN atRELATIONSHIPS ~~Fair~~AND ~~Value~~RELATED onPARTY aTRANSACTIONS ~~Recurring Basis~~

The Partnership ~~uses~~has aentered ~~market~~into ~~approach~~the ~~fair~~following ~~value~~significant ~~methodology~~transactions towith ~~value~~ the ~~assets~~MGP and ~~liabilities~~its ~~for~~affiliates as provided under its ~~outstanding~~Partnership ~~derivative~~Agreement. ~~contracts~~Administrative ~~(See~~costs, ~~Note~~which ~~4).~~are ~~The~~included ~~Partnership~~in ~~manages~~general and ~~reports~~administrative expenses in the ~~derivative~~Partnership’s ~~assets~~statements ~~and~~of ~~liabilities~~operations, onare ~~the~~payable ~~basis~~at of$75 ~~its~~per ~~net~~well ~~exposure~~per tomonth. ~~market~~Monthly ~~risks~~well ~~and~~supervision ~~credit~~fees, ~~risks~~which byare ~~counterparty.~~included ~~The~~in production expense in the Partnership’s ~~commodity~~statements ~~derivative~~of ~~contracts~~operations, are ~~valued~~payable ~~based~~at on$320 ~~observable~~per ~~market~~well ~~data~~per ~~related~~month for operating and maintaining the wells. Well supervision fees are proportionately reduced to the ~~change~~extent inthe ~~price~~Partnership does not acquire 100% of the ~~underlying~~working ~~commodity~~interest ~~and~~in ~~are~~a ~~therefore~~well. ~~defined~~Transportation asfees ~~Level~~are 2included ~~assets~~in ~~and~~production ~~liabilities~~expenses ~~within~~in the ~~same~~Partnership’s ~~class~~statements of ~~nature~~operations and ~~risk.~~are ~~The~~generally ~~fair~~payable ~~values~~at 13% of ~~these~~the ~~derivative~~natural ~~instruments~~gas ~~are~~sales ~~calculated~~price. byDirect ~~utilizing commodity indices~~costs, ~~quoted~~which ~~prices~~are ~~for~~included ~~futures~~in production and ~~options~~general ~~contracts~~administrative ~~traded~~expenses onin ~~open~~the ~~markets~~Partnership’s ~~that~~statements ~~coincide~~of ~~with~~operations, ~~the~~are ~~underlying~~payable ~~commodity,~~to ~~expiration~~the ~~period,~~MGP ~~strike~~and ~~price~~its ~~(if~~affiliates ~~applicable)~~as ~~and~~reimbursement ~~the~~for ~~pricing~~all ~~formula~~costs ~~utilized~~expended inon the ~~derivative~~Partnership’s ~~instrument~~behalf.

Information for assets measured at fair value at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was as follows:

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
As of September 30, 2015
Derivative assets, gross
Commodity puts	$	-	$	14,000	$	-	$	14,000

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
As of December 31, 2014
Derivative assets, gross
Commodity puts	$	-	$	15,700	$	-	$	15,700

Other Financial Instruments

The estimated fair value of the Partnership’s other financial instruments has been determined based upon its assessment of available market information and valuation methodologies. However, these estimates may not necessarily be indicative of the amounts that the Partnership could realize upon the sale of such financial instruments. The Partnership’s other current assets and liabilities on its balance sheets are considered to be financial instruments. The estimated fair values of these instruments approximate their carrying amounts due to their short-term nature and thus are categorized as Level 1.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Non-Recurring Basis

The Partnership estimates the fair value of its asset retirement obligations based on discounted cash flow projections using numerous estimates, assumptions and judgments regarding such factors at the date of establishment of an asset retirement obligation such as: amounts and timing of settlements, the credit-adjusted risk-free rate of the Partnership and estimated inflation rates (See Note 3). There were no additional assets or liabilities that were measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014.

Management estimates the fair value of the Partnership’s long-lived assets in connection with reviewing these assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable, using estimates, assumptions and judgments regarding such events or circumstances. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Partnership recognized $213,900 of impairment related to gas and oil properties. These estimates of fair value are Level 3 measurements as they are based upon unobservable inputs. No impairments were recognized during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014.

NOTE 6 - CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Partnership has entered into the following significant transactions with the MGP and its affiliates as provided under its Partnership Agreement. Administrative costs, which are included in general and administrative expenses in the Partnership’s statements of operations, are payable at $75 per well per month. Monthly well supervision fees, which are included in production expenses in the Partnership’s statements of operations, are payable at $320 per well per month for operating and maintaining the wells. Well supervision fees are proportionately reduced to the extent the Partnership does not acquire 100% of the working interest in a well. Transportation fees are included in production expenses in the Partnership’s statements of operations and are generally payable at 13% of the natural gas sales price. Direct costs, which are included in production and general administrative expenses in the Partnership’s statements of operations, are payable to the MGP and its affiliates as reimbursement for all costs expended on the Partnership’s behalf.

The following table provides information with respect to these costs and the periods incurred:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
		Three Months Ended March 31,
	2015			2014			2015		2014
		2016			2015
Administrative fees	$	~~17,300~~$	19,400	$	~~24,200~~$	25,300	$	~~62,400~~	$	~~71,700~~
Supervision fees		~~73,800~~	82,800		~~103,300~~	108,100		~~266,300~~		~~306,000~~
Transportation fees		~~5,500~~	7,500		~~11,600~~	14,400		~~27,000~~		~~77,600~~
Direct costs		~~46,400~~	37,800		~~59,100~~	53,800		~~151,200~~		~~173,700~~
Total	$	~~143,000~~$	147,500	$	~~198,200~~$	201,600	$	~~506,900~~	$	~~629,000~~

The MGP and its affiliates perform all administrative and management functions for the Partnership, including billing revenues and paying expenses. Accounts payable trade-affiliate on the Partnership’s balance sheets includes the net production ~~expenses~~expense due to the MGP ~~as of September 30, 2015~~. ~~Accounts receivable trade-affiliate on the Partnership’s balance sheets includes the net production revenues due from the MGP as of December 31, 2014.~~

NOTE 76 - COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

General Commitments

Subject to certain conditions, ~~limited~~investor partners may present their interests for purchase by the MGP. The purchase price is calculated by the MGP in accordance with the terms of the Partnership ~~Agreement~~agreement. The MGP is not obligated to purchase more than 5% of the total outstanding units in any calendar year. In the event that the MGP is unable to obtain the necessary funds, it may suspend its purchase obligation.

Beginning one year after each of the Partnership’s wells has been placed into production, the MGP, as operator, may retain $200 per month per well to cover estimated future plugging and abandonment costs. As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016, the MGP withheld $~~222~~420,700 of net production revenue for future plugging and abandonment costs.

Legal Proceedings

The Partnership is a party to various routine legal proceedings arising out of the ordinary course of its business. Management believes that none of these actions, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Partnership’s financial condition or results of operations.

Affiliates of the MGP and their subsidiaries are party to various routine legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of their respective businesses. The MGP’s management believes that none of these actions, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the MGP’s financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

Forward-Looking Statements

When used in this Form 10-Q, the words “believes”, “anticipates,” “expects” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to differ materially from the results stated or implied in this document. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to forward-looking statements which we may make to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this Form 10-Q or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

General

Atlas America Public #11-2002 LTD. (“we”, “us”, or the “Partnership”) is a Delaware limited partnership, formed on June 5, 2002 with Atlas Resources, LLC serving as its Managing General Partner and Operator (“Atlas Resources” or the “MGP”). Atlas Resources is an indirect subsidiary of Atlas Resource Partners, L.P. (“ARP”) (NYSE: ARP). Unless the context otherwise requires, references to “the Partnership,” “we,” “us” and “our”, refer to Atlas America Public #11-2002 LTD.

~~On February 27, 2015, the MGP’s ultimate parent,~~ Atlas Energy, L.P. (“Atlas Energy”), which was a publicly traded master-limited partnership, was acquired by Targa Resources Corp. and distributed to Atlas Energy’s unitholders 100% of the limited liability company interests in ARP’s general partner, Atlas Energy Group, LLC ~~(“Atlas~~manages Energy Group”; NYSE: ATLS). Atlas Energy Group became a separate, publicly traded company and the ultimate parent of the MGP as a result of the distribution. Following the distribution, Atlas Energy Group continues to manage ARP’s operations and activities through its ownership of the ARP’s general partner interest.

We have drilled and currently operate wells located in Pennsylvania and Ohio. We have no employees and rely on our MGP for management, which in turn, relies on its parent company, Atlas Energy Group ~~(February 27~~, ~~2015 and prior, Atlas Energy),~~ for administrative services.

We intend to continue to produce our wells until they are depleted or become uneconomical to produce, at which time they will be plugged and abandoned or sold. We expect that no other wells will be drilled and no additional funds will be required for drilling.

Overview

The following discussion provides information to assist in understanding our financial condition and results of operations. Our operating cash flows are generated from our wells, which produce primarily natural gas, but also some oil. Our produced natural gas and oil is then delivered to market through affiliated and/or third-party gas gathering systems. Our ongoing operating and maintenance costs have been and are expected to be fulfilled through revenues from the sale of our natural gas and oil production. We pay our MGP, as operator, a monthly well supervision fee, which covers all normal and regularly recurring operating expenses for the production and sale of natural gas and oil such as:

well tending, routine maintenance and adjustment;

reading meters, recording production, pumping, maintaining appropriate books and records; and

preparation of reports for us and government agencies.

The well supervision fees, however, do not include costs and expenses related to the purchase of certain equipment, materials and brine disposal. If these expenses are incurred, we pay cost for third-party services, materials and a competitive charge for services performed directly by our MGP or its affiliates. Also, beginning one year after each of our wells has been placed into production, our MGP, as operator, may retain $200 per month, per well, to cover the estimated future plugging and abandonment costs of the well. As of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016, our MGP withheld $~~222~~420,700 of net production revenues for this purpose.

Markets and Competition

The availability of a ready market for natural gas and oil produced by us, and the price obtained, depends on numerous factors beyond our control, including the extent of domestic production, imports of foreign natural gas and oil, political instability or terrorist acts in gas and oil producing countries and regions, market demand, competition from other energy sources, the effect of federal regulation on the sale of natural gas and oil in interstate commerce, other governmental regulation of the production and transportation of natural gas and oil and the proximity, availability and capacity of pipelines and other required facilities. Our MGP is responsible for selling our production. During ~~2014~~2016 and ~~the first nine months of~~ 2015, we experienced no problems in selling our natural gas and oil. Product availability and price are the principal means of competing in selling natural gas and oil production. While it is impossible to accurately determine our comparative position in the industry, we do not consider our operations to be a significant factor in the industry.

1813

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth information relating to our production revenues, volumes, sales prices, production costs and depletion during the periods indicated:

	Three Months EndedSeptember 30,								Nine months EndedSeptember 30,
		Three Months EndedMarch 31,
	2015				2014				2015			2014
		2016				2015
Production revenues (in thousands):
Gas	$	48$	58		$	~~114~~$	116		$	~~230~~		$	~~666~~
Oil		14	6			37	7			49			84
Liquids		-	1			2	1			1			5
Total	$	62$	65		$	~~153~~$	124		$	~~280~~		$	~~755~~
Production volumes:
Gas (Mcf/day) (1)		452				631				507			630
Gas (mcf/day) (1)			455				557
Oil (bbl/day) (1)		4	2			4	2			4			3
Liquids (bbl/day) (1)		-	-			-	-			1			-
Total (Mcfe/day) (1)		476				655				531			648
Total (mcfe/day) (1)			467				569
Average sales prices: (2)
Gas (per Mcf) (1) (3) (4)	$	1.14			$	2.69			$	1.66		$	3.94
Gas (per mcf) (1)		$	1.39			$	2.54
Oil (per bbl) (1)	$	36.97			$	96.60			$	46.57		$	95.56
Oil (per bbl)		$	31.34			$	43.85
Liquids (per bbl) (1)	$	~~16.07~~$	18.73		$	~~50.41~~$	35.61		$	~~25.17~~		$	~~52.88~~
Production costs:
As a percent of revenues (4)		181	%			84	%			143	%		69	%
As a percent of revenues			177	%			131	%
Per Mcfe (1)	$	2.55			$	2.65			$	2.77		$	2.93
Per mcfe (1)		$	2.67			$	3.16
Depletion per Mcfe	$	0.09			$	0.19			$	0.08		$	0.17
Depletion per mcfe		$	-			$	0.07

(1) “Mcf” represents thousand cubic feet, “~~Mcfe~~mcfe” represents thousand cubic feet equivalent, and “bbl” represents barrels. Bbl is converted to ~~Mcfe~~mcfe using the ratio of six ~~Mcfs~~mcfs to one bbl.

(2) Average sales prices represent accrual basis pricing ~~after adjusting for the effect of previously recognized gains resulting from prior period impairment charges~~.

~~(3)~~Natural ~~Average~~Gas Revenues. Our natural gas ~~prices~~revenues ~~are~~were ~~calculated~~$57,600 byand ~~including~~$115,800 infor ~~total~~the ~~revenue~~three ~~derivative~~months ~~gains~~ended ~~previously~~March ~~recognized~~31, ~~into~~2016 ~~income~~and 2015, respectively, a decrease of $58,200 (50%). The $58,200 decrease in ~~connection~~natural ~~with~~gas revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2016 as compared to the prior year similar period ~~impairment~~was ~~charges~~attributable ~~and~~to ~~dividing~~a by$38,300 ~~the~~decrease ~~total~~in ~~volume~~our ~~for~~natural gas sales prices after the ~~period.~~effect ~~Previously~~of ~~recognized~~financial ~~derivative~~hedges, ~~gains~~which were $3driven by market conditions,~~900~~ and a $1119,~~500~~900 decrease in production volumes. Our production volumes decreased to 455 mcf per day for the three ~~and~~months ~~nine~~ended March 31, 2016 from 557 mcf per day for the three months ended ~~September 30~~March 31, ~~2014~~2015, ~~respectively~~a decrease of 102 mcf per day (18%). The decrease in production volumes is mostly due to the normal decline inherent in the life of the wells in addition to wells shut-in due to it being uneconomical to continue production in the current pricing environment.

~~(4)~~Oil ~~The~~Revenues. ~~average~~We ~~sales~~drilled ~~price~~wells ~~and~~primarily to produce natural gas, rather than oil, but some wells have limited oil production. ~~costs~~Our asoil revenues were $6,500 and $7,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, a ~~percentage~~decrease of ~~revenues~~$500 ~~for~~(7%). ~~natural~~The ~~gas~~$500 decrease in oil revenues for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2014~~2016 ~~has~~as ~~been~~compared ~~adjusted~~to the prior year similar period was attributable to ~~reflect~~a $382,600 decrease in oil prices, partially offset by a $2,100 increase in production volumes. Our production volumes increased to 2.27 bbls per day for the three months ended March 31, 2016 from 1.76 bbls per day for the three months ended March 31, 2015, an increase of ~~additional~~0.51 ~~revenue~~bbls per day (29%).

1914

Natural Gas ~~Revenues~~Liquids Revenue. ~~During~~The ~~the~~majority ~~quarter~~of ~~ended~~our ~~September~~wells ~~30,~~produce ~~2014~~“dry gas”, ~~management~~which ~~identified~~is ancomposed ~~error~~primarily inof ~~the~~methane ~~process~~and ~~used~~requires tono ~~estimate~~additional ~~our~~processing ~~unbilled~~before ~~revenue.~~being Astransported aand ~~result,~~sold ~~natural~~to ~~gas revenue for~~ the ~~three~~purchaser. ~~months~~Some ~~ended~~wells, ~~September 30~~however, ~~2014~~produce ~~included~~“wet ~~an adjustment to reduce natural~~ gas ~~revenue by $38~~”,~~100.~~ ~~The~~which ~~adjustment~~contains islarger ~~the~~amounts ~~result~~ of ~~overestimating~~ethane ~~our~~and ~~unbilled~~other ~~revenues~~associated ashydrocarbons of(i.e. ~~June~~“natural ~~30,~~gas ~~2014.~~liquids”) ~~Refer~~that tomust ~~the~~be ~~Partnership’s~~removed ~~Form~~prior ~~10-Q~~to ~~for~~transporting the ~~quarter~~gas. ~~ended~~Once ~~September 30~~removed, ~~2014~~these ~~for~~natural ~~further~~gas ~~explanation~~liquids ofare ~~this~~sold ~~error~~to various purchasers. Our ~~unadjusted~~ natural gas liquids revenues were $~~47,600~~500 and $~~152,400~~900 for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, respectively~~, a decrease of $104,800 (69%)~~. ~~The~~Our ~~$104,800~~production ~~decrease~~volumes in natural gas revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the prior year similar period was attributable to a $61,600 decrease in our natural gas sales prices after the effect of financial hedges, which were ~~driven~~0.32 ~~by market conditions,~~ and ~~a $43,200 decrease in production volumes~~0.29 ~~Our~~bbls ~~production volumes decreased to 452 Mcf~~ per day for the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016 ~~from~~and ~~631 Mcf per day for the three months ended September 30~~2015, ~~2014, a decrease of 179 Mcf per day (28%)~~respectively. The overall decrease in natural gas production volumes for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the prior year similar period resulted primarily from the normal decline inherent in the life of a well and a decrease in the number of producing wells due to wells shut-in as a result of a decline in natural gas prices.

~~Our~~Gain ~~natural~~on ~~gas~~Mark-to-Market ~~revenues~~Derivatives. ~~were~~On ~~$230,000~~January ~~and $666~~1,~~400~~ ~~for the nine months ended September 30~~2015, ~~2015~~we ~~and~~discontinued ~~2014,~~hedge ~~respectively,~~accounting afor ~~decrease~~our ofqualified ~~$436,400~~commodity ~~(66%)~~derivatives. ~~The~~As ~~$436~~such,~~400~~ ~~decrease~~subsequent changes in ~~natural~~fair ~~gas~~value ~~revenues~~of ~~for~~these ~~the~~derivatives ~~nine~~are ~~months~~recognized ~~ended~~immediately ~~September~~within ~~30,~~gain ~~2015~~on ~~as compared~~ mark-to-market ~~the~~derivatives ~~prior~~on ~~year similar period was attributable to a $306,100 decrease in~~ our ~~natural~~statements ~~gas sales prices after the effect~~ of ~~financial hedges, which were driven by market conditions, and a $130,300 decrease in production volumes~~operations. ~~Our~~The ~~production~~fair ~~volumes~~values ~~decreased~~of tothese ~~507~~commodity ~~Mcf~~derivative ~~per~~instruments ~~day~~as ~~for~~of ~~the~~December ~~nine months ended September 30~~31, ~~2015 from 630 Mcf per day for the nine months ended September 30,~~ 2014, awhich ~~decrease~~were ofrecognized ~~123 Mcf per day (20%). The overall decrease~~ in ~~natural~~accumulated ~~gas~~other ~~production~~comprehensive ~~volumes~~income ~~for~~within ~~the~~partners’ ~~nine~~capital ~~months~~on ~~ended~~our ~~September~~balance 30sheet, ~~2015~~will asbe ~~compared~~reclassified to ~~the~~our ~~prior~~statements ~~year~~of ~~similar~~operations ~~period~~in ~~resulted primarily from~~ the ~~normal~~future ~~decline~~at ~~inherent in~~ the ~~life~~time ~~of a well and a decrease in~~ the ~~number~~originally ofhedged ~~producing~~physical ~~wells~~transactions ~~due to wells shut-in as a result of a decline in natural gas prices~~settle.

~~Oil Revenues.~~ We ~~drill~~recognized ~~wells~~a ~~primarily~~gain on mark-to-market ~~produce~~derivatives ~~natural~~of ~~gas, rather than oil, but some wells have limited oil production. Our oil revenues were~~ $132,~~800~~900 and $362,~~800~~500 for the ~~three~~periods ~~months~~ ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, respectively~~, a decrease of $23,000 (63%)~~. ~~The~~These ~~$23,000~~gains ~~decrease~~were indue ~~oil revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2015 as compared~~ to ~~the prior year similar period was attributable~~ mark-to-market agains ~~$22,400~~primarily ~~decrease~~related ~~in oil prices and a $600 decrease in production volumes. Our production volumes decreased~~ to ~~4.07 bbls per day for~~ the ~~three~~change ~~months~~in ~~ended~~natural ~~September~~gas ~~30,~~prices ~~2015~~during ~~from 4.14 bbls per day for~~ the ~~three months ended September 30, 2014, a decrease of~~ periods.~~07 bbls per day (2%).~~

~~Our~~Costs ~~oil~~and ~~revenues~~Expenses. Production expenses were $48114,~~800~~300 and $84162,~~500~~000 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, respectively, a decrease of $3547,700 (4229%). ~~The~~This ~~$35,700~~ decrease ~~in oil revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 as compared to the prior year similar period~~ was mostly attributable to a ~~$51,400~~ decrease in ~~oil~~supervision ~~prices,~~fees ~~partially~~due ~~offset~~to bywells abeing ~~$15,700 increase~~ shut-in ~~production~~and ~~volumes.~~a ~~Our~~decrease ~~production~~in ~~volumes increased to 3~~transportation.~~84 bbls per day for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 from 3.24 bbls per day for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, an increase of 0.60 bbls per day (19%).~~

~~Natural~~For ~~Gas~~the ~~Liquids~~three ~~Revenue.~~months ~~The~~ended ~~majority~~March of31, ~~our wells produce “dry gas”~~2016, ~~which~~there iswas ~~composed~~no ~~primarily~~depletion ofrecorded ~~methane~~due ~~and~~to ~~requires~~the norecent ~~additional~~significant ~~processing~~declines ~~before~~in ~~being~~commodity ~~transported~~prices and ~~sold~~associated torecorded ~~the~~impairment ~~purchaser~~charges. ~~Some wells~~ Therefore, ~~however,~~the ~~produce~~remaining ~~“wet~~net ~~gas”,~~book ~~which~~value ~~contains larger amounts~~ of ~~ethane~~gas and ~~other~~oil ~~associated~~properties ~~hydrocarbons~~on ~~(i.e.~~our ~~“natural~~balance ~~gas~~sheet ~~liquids”)~~at ~~that~~December ~~must~~31, be2015 ~~removed~~was ~~prior~~primarily related to ~~transporting~~ the ~~gas.~~estimated ~~Once~~salvage ~~removed,~~value ~~these~~of ~~natural~~such ~~gas liquids are sold to various purchasers~~properties. For ~~Our natural gas liquids revenues were $300 and $1,900 for~~ the three months ended ~~September~~March 3031, 2015 ~~and 2014~~, ~~respectively.~~depletion ~~Our~~of ~~natural~~ gas ~~liquids revenues were $1,500~~ and ~~$4,500~~oil ~~for~~properties ~~the~~as ~~nine~~a ~~months~~percentage ~~ended~~of ~~September~~gas ~~30,~~and ~~2015~~oil ~~and~~revenues ~~2014,~~was ~~respectively~~3%.

~~Gain~~General onand ~~Mark-to-Market~~administrative ~~Derivatives.~~expenses Onfor ~~January~~the 1,three ~~2015,~~months weended ~~discontinued~~March ~~hedge~~31, ~~accounting~~2016 ~~for~~and ~~our~~2015 ~~qualified~~were ~~commodity~~$33,200 ~~derivatives.~~and As$39,600, ~~such~~respectively, ~~subsequent~~a ~~changes~~decrease ~~in fair value~~ of ~~these~~$6,400 ~~derivatives~~(16%). ~~are~~These ~~recognized~~expenses ~~immediately~~include ~~within gain on mark~~third-~~to-market~~party ~~derivatives~~costs onfor ~~our~~services ~~statements~~as ofwell ~~operations. The fair values of these commodity derivative instruments~~ as ~~December~~the ~~31,~~monthly ~~2014,~~administrative ~~which~~fees ~~were~~charged ~~recognized~~by ~~in accumulated other comprehensive income within partners’ capital on~~ our ~~balance~~MGP ~~sheet,~~and ~~will~~vary befrom ~~reclassified~~period to ~~our~~period ~~statements~~due ofto ~~operations in~~ the ~~future~~costs atcharged ~~the~~to ~~time~~us ~~the~~and ~~originally~~services ~~hedged~~provided ~~physical~~to ~~transactions settle~~us.

We recognized a gain on mark-to-market derivatives of $6,100 for the three months ended September 30, 2015. This gain was due primarily to mark-to-market gains in the current quarter primarily related to the change in natural gas prices during the year. There were no gains or losses on mark-to-market derivatives during the three months ended September 30, 2014.

We recognized a gain on mark-to-market derivatives of $6,300 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. This gain was due primarily to mark-to-market gains in the current quarter primarily related to the change in natural gas prices during the year. There were no gains or losses on mark-to-market derivatives during the nine months ended September 30, 2014.

Costs and Expenses. Production expenses were $111,700 and $160,700 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, a decrease of $49,000 (30%). Production expenses were $402,200 and $521,200 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, a decrease of $119,000 (23%). The decreases for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 were mostly due to a decrease in transportation fees due to a decline in revenue and a decrease in supervision fees due to a decrease in the number of producing wells as a result of a decline in natural gas prices.

Depletion of oil and gas properties as a percentage of oil and gas revenues was 6% and 7% for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and 4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014. These percentage changes are directly attributable to changes in revenues, oil and gas reserve quantities, product prices and production volumes and changes in the depletable cost basis of oil and gas properties.

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 were $31,300 and $37,500, respectively, a decrease of $6,200 (17%). For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, these expenses were $104,700 and $107,800, respectively, a decrease of $3,100 (3%). These expenses include third-party costs for services as well as the monthly administrative fees charged by our MGP. The decreases for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 were primarily due to third-party costs as compared to the prior year similar period.

Impairment of gas and oil properties for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 was $213,900. There were no impairment of gas and oil properties for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014. Periodically, we compare the carrying value of our proved developed gas and oil properties to their estimated fair market value. To the extent our carrying value exceeds the estimated fair market value, an impairment charge is recognized. As a result of this assessment, an impairment charge was recognized for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015. This charge is based on reserve quantities, future market prices and our carrying value. We cannot provide any assurance that similar charges may or may not be taken in future periods.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

~~There~~We ~~was~~are nogenerally ~~cash~~limited ~~provided~~to ~~by operating activities in~~ the ~~nine~~amount ~~months ended September 30, 2015 resulting in a decrease~~ of ~~$157,100~~funds asgenerated ~~compared~~by to the ~~nine~~cash ~~months~~flows ~~ended~~from ~~September~~our 30operations, ~~2014.~~which ~~This~~we ~~decrease~~believe ~~was~~is ~~mostly~~adequate ~~due~~ to afund ~~decrease~~future inoperations ~~net loss depletion, accretion, impairment~~ and ~~non-cash~~distributions ~~gain~~to onour ~~derivative value of $363,100, a decrease in the change in the asset retirement receivable of $173,300, and a decrease in accounts receivable trade-affiliate of $11,700~~partners. ~~Partially offsetting this decrease was an increase in the change of the accounts payable trade-affiliate of $387~~Historically,~~700,~~ anthere ~~increase~~has inbeen ~~accrued~~no ~~liabilities~~need ofto ~~$3,000,~~borrow ~~and~~funds anfrom ~~increase~~our inMGP ~~the~~to ~~change~~fund ~~of asset retirement obligations settled of $300~~operations.

~~There~~The ~~was~~natural nogas, ~~cash~~oil ~~used~~and natural gas liquids commodity price markets have suffered significant declines throughout 2015 and have continued to decline and remain low in ~~financing~~2016. ~~activities~~The ~~during~~extreme ongoing volatility in the ~~nine~~energy ~~months~~industry ~~ended~~and ~~September~~commodity 30prices will likely continue to impact our outlook. We have experienced downward revisions of its natural gas and oil reserves volumes and values due to the significant declines in commodity prices. Our MGP continues to implement various cost saving measures to reduce our operating and general and administrative costs, ~~2015~~including renegotiating contracts with contractors, suppliers and service providers, reducing the number of staff and contractors and deferring and eliminating discretionary costs. ~~Cash~~Our ~~used~~MGP will continue to be opportunistic and aggressive in ~~financing~~managing ~~activities~~our ~~was~~cost ~~$202~~structure and,~~500~~ ~~for~~in turn, liquidity to meet our operating needs. To the ~~nine~~extent ~~months~~commodity ~~ended~~prices ~~September~~remain 30low or decline further, ~~2014~~or ~~due~~we experience other disruptions in the industry, our ability to ~~cash~~fund our operations and make distributions may be further impacted, and could result in the MGP’s decision to ~~partners~~liquidate our operations.

~~Our~~Historically, ~~MGP~~there ~~may~~has ~~withhold~~been no need to borrow funds ~~for~~from ~~future~~the ~~plugging~~MGP to fund operations as the cash flow from our operations have been adequate to fund our obligations and ~~abandonment~~distributions ~~costs.~~to ~~Through~~our ~~September~~partners. 30However, ~~2015,~~the recent significant declines in commodity prices have challenged our ~~MGP~~ability ~~withheld~~to ~~$222,700~~fund ofour ~~funds~~operations ~~for~~and ~~this~~may ~~purpose.~~make ~~Any~~it ~~additional~~uneconomical ~~funds,~~to ifproduce ~~required~~our wells until they are depleted as we originally intended. Accordingly, ~~will~~the beMGP ~~obtained~~determined ~~from~~that ~~production~~there ~~revenues~~is orsubstantial ~~borrowings~~doubt ~~from~~about our ability to continue as a going concern. The MGP orintends, ~~its~~as ~~affiliates~~necessary, ~~which~~to ~~are~~continue ~~not~~our ~~contractually~~operations ~~committed~~and to ~~make~~fund ~~loans~~our toobligations usfor at least the next twelve months. The ~~amount~~MGP has concluded that wesuch ~~may~~undertaking ~~borrow~~is atsufficient ~~any~~to ~~one~~alleviate ~~time~~the ~~may~~doubt ~~not~~as atto ~~any~~our ~~time~~ability ~~exceed~~to 5%continue as a going concern. To the extent commodity prices remain low or decline further, ARP experiences disruptions in the financial markets impacting its respective longer-term access to or cost of ~~our~~capital, ~~total~~or ~~subscriptions~~ARP experiences any of the other impacts to its liquidity discussed below, the MGP’s ability to continue the Partnership’s operations and weto ~~will~~fund ~~not~~the ~~borrow~~Partnership’s ~~from~~obligations ~~third-parties~~for at least the next twelve months, as necessary, may be impacted.

We are generally limited to the amount of funds generated by the cash flows from our operations, which we believe is adequate to fund future operations and distributions to our partners. Historically, there has been no need to borrow funds from our MGP to fund operations. However, recent declines in commodity prices may challenge the Partnership’s ability to pay its obligations as they become due and its intention to produce its wells until they are depleted, as they may become uneconomical to produce. Accordingly, the MGP determined that there is substantial doubt about the Partnership’s ability to continue as a going concern. The MGP has planned, as necessary, to continue the Partnership’s operations and to fund the Partnership’s operations for at least the next 12 months. The MGP has concluded that such undertaking is sufficient to alleviate the doubt as to the Partnership’s ability to continue as a going concern.15

21ARP’s revolving credit facility is currently in the process of its semi-annual redetermination. Based on projected market conditions, continued declines in commodity prices and recent conversations with its administrative agent, ARP expects that its borrowing base will be redetermined to a level below its outstanding borrowings as of March 31, 2016. If ARP’s borrowing base is redetermined below its current outstanding borrowings and ARP is unable to repay the deficiency or deposit additional collateral to eliminate such deficiency, or if ARP experiences any other event of default on its debt obligations, or if other debt agreements cross-default, and the lenders accelerate the maturity of any other outstanding debts, the MGP, may not have sufficient liquidity to continue the Partnership’s operations and to fund the Partnership’s obligations, and as a result, there would be substantial doubt regarding the Partnership’s ability to continue as a going concern.

There was no cash provided by operating activities for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015. The change in asset retirement receivable-affiliate decreased $99,000, the change in accounts receivable trade-affiliate decreased $75,700, and net earnings before depletion and accretion decreased $4,600. The change in accounts payable trade-affiliate increased $172,600, the change in non-cash gain (loss) on derivative value increase $3,800 and the change in accrued liabilities increase $2,900.

Our MGP may withhold funds for future plugging and abandonment costs. Through March 31, 2016, our MGP withheld $420,700 of funds for this purpose. Any additional funds, if required, will be obtained from production revenues or borrowings from our MGP or its affiliates, which are not contractually committed to make loans to us. The amount that we may borrow at any one time may not at any time exceed 5% of our total subscriptions, and we will not borrow from third-parties.

Critical Accounting Policies

~~The~~For ~~discussion~~a ~~and~~more ~~analysis~~complete ofdiscussion ~~our financial condition and results~~ of ~~operations~~the isaccounting ~~based~~policies upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to our asset retirement obligations, depletion and ~~certain accrued receivables and liabilities. We base our~~ estimates ~~on historical experience and on various other assumptions~~ that we believe reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. A discussion of significant accounting policies we have ~~adopted~~identified ~~and~~as ~~followed~~critical in the preparation of our condensed consolidated financial statements, isplease ~~included~~refer ~~within “Notes~~ to ~~Financial~~our ~~Statements”~~Management’s inDiscussion ~~Part~~and I,Analysis ~~Item 1,~~of “Financial ~~Statements”~~Condition inand ~~this~~Results ~~quarterly~~of ~~report~~Operations ~~and~~ in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our Securities Exchange Act of 1934 reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our general partner’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Under the supervision of our general partner’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and with the participation of our disclosure committee appointed by such officers, we have carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our general partner’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2015~~2016, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting during our most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

2217

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.		Description
4(a)		Amended and Restated Certificate and Agreement of Limited Partnership for Atlas America Public #11-2002 LTD. (1)
4.0		Amended and Restated Certificate and Agreement of Limited Partnership for Atlas America Public #11-2002 LTD. (1)
10.1		Drilling and Operating Agreement for Atlas America Public #11-2002 LTD. (1)
31.1		Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14/15(d)-14
31.1		Rule 13a-14/15(d)-14 (a) Certification
31.2		Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14/15(d)-14
31.2		Rule 13a-14/15(d)-14 (a) Certification
32.1		Section 1350 Certification
32.2		Section 1350 Certification
101		Interactive Data File

(1) Filed on October 11, 2002 in the Form S-1/A Registration Statement dated October 11, 2002, File No. 333-90980

2318

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities of the Exchange Act of 1934, ~~this~~the ~~report~~registrant has ~~been~~duly ~~signed~~caused ~~below~~this byreport ~~the~~to ~~following~~be ~~person~~signed on its behalf ofby the ~~registrant~~undersigned, ~~and~~thereunto induly ~~the capacities and on the dates indicated~~authorized.

		ATLAS AMERICA PUBLIC #11-2002 LTD.
		By: ATLAS RESOURCES, LLC, General Partner
		By: Atlas Resources, LLC, its Managing General Partner
Date: November 23, 2015		By:/s/ FREDDIE M. KOTEK
Date: May 23, 2016		By: /s/ FREDDIE M. KOTEK
		Freddie M. Kotek, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer and President
		Freddie M. Kotek, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Managing General Partners
Date: November 23, 2015		By:/s/ JEFFREY M. SLOTTERBACK
		Jeffrey M. Slotterback, Chief Financial Officer

24Date: May 23, 2016 By: /s/ JEFFREY M. SLOTTERBACK Jeffrey M. Slotterback, Chief Financial Officer of the Managing General Partner

Filing Compare · ATLAS AMERICA PUBLIC #11-2002 LTD.