UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark one)

[X]	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017

[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 001-34686

Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		16-1710376
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1177 Bishop Street

Honolulu, Hawaii 96813

(Address of principal executive offices)

808-546-4511

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer [ ]

Accelerated Filer [X]

Non-Accelerated Filer [ ]

(Do not check if smaller
reporting company)

Smaller reporting company [ ]

Emerging Growth Company [ ]

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes [X] No [ ]

As of ~~August~~November 8, 2017, 11,587,963 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.

Table of Contents

		Page
Part I	Financial Information
Item 1	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	3
Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	2123
Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	3133
Item 4	Controls and Procedures	3234
Part II	Other Information
Item 1	Legal Proceedings	3335
Item 1A	Risk Factors	3335
Item 5	Other Information	3437
Item 6	Exhibits	3538

Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income (Loss)

(Unaudited, dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

Three Months Ended

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended

June 30,

September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

Operating revenues

91,~~298~~013

9997,~~541~~848

~~185~~276,~~808~~821

~~198~~296,~~335~~183

Operating expenses:

Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)

40,~~181~~100

4041,~~605~~903

81121,~~372~~472

83124,~~084~~987

Selling, general and administrative

2629,~~608~~827

29,~~554~~206

5887,~~003~~830

5988,~~419~~625

Depreciation and amortization

2122,~~742~~174

2223,~~493~~036

4365,~~012~~186

4467,~~443~~479

Total operating expenses

8892,~~531~~101

9294,~~652~~145

~~182~~274,~~387~~488

~~186~~281,~~946~~091

Operating income

2,767

6,889

3,421

11,389

Operating income (loss)

(1,088)

3,703

2,333

15,092

Other income (expense):

Interest expense

(34,~~819~~150)

(4,~~484~~156)

(711,~~812~~962)

(812,~~724~~879)

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

~~(4,826)~~—

—

(4,826)

—

Total other expense

(84,~~645~~150)

(4,~~484~~156)

(1216,~~638~~788)

(812,~~724~~879)

Income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit)

(5,~~878~~238)

~~2,405~~(453)

(914,~~217~~455)

2,~~665~~213

Income tax provision (benefit)

(287,~~402)~~481

~~960~~(174)

(383,~~788)~~693

~~1,066~~892

Net income (loss)

(392,~~476~~719)

~~1,445~~(279)

(598,~~429~~148)

1,~~599~~321

Net income (loss) per common share -

Basic

(08.3000)

(0.1302)

(08.4748)

0.1411

Diluted

(08.3000)

(0.1302)

(08.4748)

0.1411

Weighted average shares used to compute net income (loss) per common share -

Basic

11,587,963

11,~~511~~512,~~591~~280

11,~~558~~568,~~667~~540

11,~~493~~499,~~712~~947

Diluted

11,587,963

11,~~525~~512,~~850~~280

11,~~558~~568,~~667~~540

11,~~523~~539,~~215~~828

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(Unaudited, dollars in thousands)

	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Net income (loss)	$	(392,~~476~~719)	$	~~1,445~~(279)	$	(598,~~429~~148)	$	1,~~599~~321
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Retirement plan gain (loss)		~~(998)~~2,485		~~247~~(8,674)		2022,~~143~~628		~~494~~(8,179)
Income tax benefit (provision) on other comprehensive income (loss)		~~382~~(950)		~~(94)~~3,315		(78,~~699~~649)		~~(188)~~3,126
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax		~~(616)~~1,535		~~153~~(5,359)		1213,~~444~~979		~~306~~(5,053)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(4,092)	$	1,598	$	7,015	$	1,905
Comprehensive loss	$	(91,184)	$	(5,638)	$	(84,169)	$	(3,732)

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited, dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

	June 30,		December 31,
	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2544,~~854~~723	$	15,821
Receivables, net		2830,~~030~~374		33,377
Material and supplies		76,~~127~~950		8,090
Prepaid expenses		54,~~898~~906		4,093
Other current assets		72,~~292~~582		7,229
Total current assets		7489,~~201~~535		68,610
Property, plant and equipment, net		~~601~~608,~~332~~098		595,997
Intangible assets, net		31,~~877~~452		32,728
Goodwill		12,104		12,104
Deferred income taxes, net		~~88,528~~—		92,171
Other assets		2,~~462~~176		2,311
Total assets	$	~~810~~743,~~504~~365	$	803,921
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities
Current portion of long-term debt	$	10,250	$	3,000
Accounts payable		4752,~~920~~899		53,506
Accrued expenses		1013,~~433~~326		15,293
Advance billings and customer deposits		15,~~095~~165		15,013
Other current liabilities		6,~~822~~407		6,327
Total current liabilities		9098,~~520~~047		93,139
Long-term debt		~~303~~301,~~636~~351		281,699
Employee benefit obligations		8581,~~367~~678		105,930
Other liabilities		1739,~~324~~039		18,239
Total liabilities		~~496~~520,~~847~~115		499,007
Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)
Stockholders’ equity
Common stock, par value of $0.01 per share, 245,000,000 shares authorized and 11,587,963 and 11,513,279 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively		116		115
Common stock, par value of $0.01 per share, 245,000,000 shares authorized and 11,587,963 and 11,513,279 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively		116		115
Additional paid-in capital		181,~~135~~912		179,958
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(2221,~~774~~239)		(35,218)
Retained earnings		~~155~~62,~~180~~461		160,059
Total stockholders’ equity		~~313~~223,~~657~~250		304,914
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	~~810~~743,~~504~~365	$	803,921

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited, dollars in thousands)

	Six Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended
	June 30,
	September 30,
	2017		2016
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(598,~~429~~148)	$	1,~~599~~321
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		4365,~~012~~186		4467,~~443~~479
Deferred financing amortization		~~888~~1,165		1,~~005~~533
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		4,826		—
Employee retirement benefits		(~~420~~1,624)		(36,~~896~~430)
Provision for uncollectible receivables		12,~~788~~791		2,~~139~~908
Stock based compensation		12,~~273~~050		1,~~141~~722
Deferred income taxes		(384,~~506)~~072		1,~~377~~412
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables		~~3,559~~212		1,~~477~~340
Material and supplies		~~963~~1,140		~~(104)~~282
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(1,~~868~~166)		(21,~~594~~839)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(~~3,579~~44)		6,~~837~~067
Advance billings and customer deposits		8220,677		(12,~~593~~227)
Other current liabilities		~~648~~(272)		(~~385~~600)
Other		(~~1,681~~100)		(~~157~~22)
Net cash provided by operating activities		4080,~~556~~765		5172,~~289~~946
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(5275,~~630~~718)		(5278,~~898~~334)
Net cash used in investing activities		(5275,~~630~~718)		(5278,~~898~~334)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from borrowing		330,000		—
Proceeds from installment financing		1,260		1,698
Repayment of capital lease and installment financing		(2,~~225~~989)		(12,~~707~~680)
Repayment of borrowings		(~~300~~302,~~138~~701)		(12,~~500~~250)
Refinancing costs		(6,295)		(688)
Taxes paid related to net share settlement of equity awards		(495)		(~~351~~354)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		2218,~~107~~780		(24,~~548~~274)
Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash		1023,~~033~~827		(49,~~157~~662)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of period		21,146		3430,~~137~~312
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of period	$	3144,~~179~~973	$	2920,~~980~~650

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc.

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

(Unaudited, dollars in thousands)

						Accumulated
				Additional		Other				Total
	Common Stock			Paid-In		Comprehensive		Retained		Stockholders’
	Shares	Amount		Capital		Income (Loss)		Earnings		Equity
Balance, January 1, 2017	11,513,279	$	115	$	179,958	$	(35,218)	$	160,059	$	304,914
Cumulative effect of adoption of new accounting standard for stock compensation	—		—		—		—		550		550
Stock based compensation	—		—		12,~~273~~050		—		—		12,~~273~~050
Common stock issued for stock compensation plans, net of shares withheld and withholding paid for employee taxes	74,684		1		(96)		—		—		(95)
Net loss	—		—		—		—		(598,~~429~~148)		(598,~~429~~148)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax	—		—		—		1213,~~444~~979		—		1213,~~444~~979
Balance, June 30, 2017	11,587,963	$	116	$	181,135	$	(22,774)	$	155,180	$	313,657
Balance, September 30, 2017	11,587,963	$	116	$	181,912	$	(21,239)	$	62,461	$	223,250
Balance, January 1, 2016	11,466,398	$	115	$	178,019	$	(29,388)	$	158,953	$	307,699
Stock based compensation	—		—		1,~~141~~722		—		—		1,~~141~~722
Common stock issued for stock compensation plans, net of shares withheld and withholding paid for employee taxes	4546,~~193~~104		—		(~~351~~354)		—		—		(~~351~~354)
Net income	—		—		—		—		1,~~599~~321		1,~~599~~321
Other comprehensive income, net of tax	—		—		—		306		—		306
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax	—		—		—		(5,053)		—		(5,053)
Balance, June 30, 2016	11,511,591	$	115	$	178,809	$	(29,082)	$	160,552	$	310,394
Balance, September 30, 2016	11,512,502	$	115	$	179,387	$	(34,441)	$	160,274	$	305,335

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1. Description of Business

Business Description

Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) is the incumbent local exchange carrier for the State of Hawaii with an integrated telecommunications network. The Company offers a variety of telecommunication services to residential and business customers in Hawaii including local telephone, network access and data transport, television, Internet, long distance and wireless phone service. The Company also provides communications equipment sales and maintenance, data center colocation and network managed services.

Proposed Merger

On July 9, 2017, Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc. (“Holdco”), a Delaware corporation, Cincinnati Bell Inc. (“Cincinnati Bell”), an Ohio corporation, Twin Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Cincinnati Bell (“Merger Sub”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into Holdco and Holdco will be the surviving corporation (the “Merger”).

Pursuant to the Merger Agreement and as consideration for the Merger, Holdco shareholders will have the option to elect either $30.75 in cash, 1.6305 shares of Cincinnati Bell common stock, or a mix of $18.45 in cash and 0.6522 shares of Cincinnati Bell common stock for each Holdco share. The final distribution to Holdco shareholders is subject to proration such that the aggregate consideration to be paid to Holdco stockholders will be 60 percent cash and 40 percent Cincinnati Bell common stock. Such distribution will be made upon closing of the Merger.

The completion of this transaction is subject to closing conditions including the receipt of regulatory approvals from, among others, the Hawaii Public Utilities Commission, and approval by the Holdco shareholders. The Merger Agreement contains certain termination rights for Holdco and Cincinnati Bell. The Merger Agreement stipulates that in the event of a termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, primarily related to if the Company receives and favors a competing merger offer, the Company will be required to pay a fee of $11.9 million.

In connection with entering into the Merger Agreement with Cincinnati Bell, the Company incurred ~~transaction~~professional fees related to the transaction of $2.0 million and $2.2 million during the ~~quarter~~three and nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, respectively.

Organization

The Company has one direct wholly-owned subsidiary, Hawaiian Telcom Communications, Inc. which has two direct wholly-owned subsidiaries – Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. and Hawaiian Telcom Services Company, Inc. Hawaiian Telcom, Inc. operates the regulated local exchange carrier and Hawaiian Telcom Services Company, Inc. operates all other businesses.

Table of Contents

2. Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared by the Company in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and pursuant to rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. Certain information and disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted and condensed. In the opinion of the Company’s management, all adjustments have been made to present fairly the results of operations, comprehensive income, financial position and cash flows for the periods presented. The results of operations for the periods presented are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, these financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2016.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash and money market accounts with maturities at acquisition of three months or less. The majority of cash balances at ~~June~~September 30, 2017 are held in one bank in demand deposit accounts.

Supplemental Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities

Accounts payable included $1924.60 million and $21.57 million at ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, for additions to property, plant and equipment.

Taxes Collected from Customers

The Company presents taxes collected from customers and remitted to governmental authorities on a gross basis, including such amounts in the Company’s reported operating revenues. Such amounts represent primarily Hawaii state general excise taxes and Hawaii Public Utility Commission fees. Such taxes and fees amounted to $2.01 million and $2.01 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Such taxes and fees amounted to $46.23 million and $46.34 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Earnings per Share

Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted effect of all common shares issued and outstanding, and is calculated by dividing earnings by the weighted average shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing earnings, adjusted for the effect, if any, from assumed conversion of all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding, by the weighted average number of common shares used in the basic earnings per share calculation plus the number of common shares that would be issued assuming conversion of all potentially dilutive common shares outstanding. The denominator used to compute basic and diluted earnings per share was as follows:

	Three Months Ended		~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
	June 30,		June 30,
	September 30,		September 30,
	2017	2016	2017	2016
Basic earnings per share - weighted average shares	11,587,963	11,~~511~~512,~~591~~280	11,~~558~~568,~~667~~540	11,~~493~~499,~~712~~947
Effect of dilutive securities:
Employee and director restricted stock units	—	~~14,259~~—	—	2939,~~503~~881
Diluted earnings per share - weighted average shares	11,587,963	11,~~525~~512,~~850~~280	11,~~558~~568,~~667~~540	11,~~523~~539,~~215~~828

Table of Contents

The computation of weighted average dilutive shares outstanding excluded grants of restricted stock units convertible into ~~310~~311,~~790~~090 shares and ~~152~~227,~~447~~888 shares of common stock for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The computation of weighted average dilutive shares outstanding excluded grants of restricted stock units convertible into ~~310~~311,~~790~~090 shares and ~~109~~8,~~730~~319 shares of common stock for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and the three months ended September 30, 2016, the Company incurred a net loss so the restricted stock units are anti-dilutive to the computation of diluted net loss per share. For the ~~three~~nine ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2016, the unrecognized compensation on a per unit basis for these restricted stock units was greater than the average market price of the Company’s common stock for the period presented.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncement

In March 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued a new standard that simplifies the accounting for employee share-based payment transactions. The new standard impacts the accounting for related income taxes, forfeitures and statutory tax withholding requirements as well as the classification of certain related payments in the statement of cash flows. The new accounting guidance was effective for the Company in the first quarter of 2017. The adoption method required is specified as retrospective, modified retrospective or prospective for each of the various accounting provisions impacted by this new standard. The Company is accounting for forfeitures on its share-based transactions as they occur beginning January 1, 2017. The impact of the modified retrospective adoption of this provision was not significant. In addition, the Company began accounting for excess tax benefits and tax deductions on share-based award settlements prospectively as income tax expense or benefit in its condensed consolidated statements of income (loss) beginning January 1, 2017. Excess tax benefits that were not recognized prior to January 1, 2017 because the related tax deduction had not reduced taxes currently payable have been recognized on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative effect adjustment which increased retained earnings as of January 1, 2017 by $0.6 million.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2017, the FASB issued additional guidance for stock compensation accounting. The guidance provides clarification on when modification accounting should be used for changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award. The standard does not change the accounting for modifications but clarifies that modification accounting guidance should only be applied if there is a change to the value, vesting conditions, or award classification and would not be required if the changes are considered non-substantive. The amendment to the accounting standard is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted and the provisions must be applied prospectively to a stock award modified on or after the adoption date. The Company is currently assessing the impact that adopting this new accounting standard will have on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued a new standard that amends the income statement presentation of the components of net periodic benefit cost for defined benefit and other postretirement plans. The new standard requires that the current service cost component be disaggregated from the other components of net benefit cost. The other components must be presented elsewhere in the income statement outside of income from operations. In addition, only the service-cost component of net benefit cost is eligible for capitalization related to self-constructed assets. The new standard is effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2018 with early adoption permitted. The presentation requirements must be adopted on a retrospective basis and the change in capitalization methodology applied on a prospective basis. The Company currently presents the entire net benefit cost in income from operations but has disclosed the components of net benefit costs in Note 7 to the condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company is currently assessing the impact of adoption of the standard on its condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

In January 2017, the FASB issued new accounting guidance simplifying the test for goodwill impairment. The new guidance eliminates the requirement to determine the fair value of individual assets and liabilities of a reporting unit to measure goodwill impairment. Under the amendments in the new standard, goodwill impairment testing will be performed by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount and recognizing an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. The new standard is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019 and should be applied on a prospective basis. Early adoption is permitted for annual or interim goodwill impairment testing performed after January 1, 2017. The Company is currently evaluating the timing of adoption.

In May 2014, the FASB issued a new accounting standard which provides guidance for revenue recognition. The new accounting standard will supersede the current revenue recognition standard and most industry-specific guidance. The standard’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The Company has concluded that it will adopt the new standard in the first quarter of 2018 using the modified retrospective approach. The modified retrospective approach requires a cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period for which the new accounting guidance is effective. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of this accounting standard on the Company’s consolidated financial statements. As this process is still ongoing, the final effect of adoption is not yet fully known. In conjunction with its efforts to prepare for adoption, the Company is focusing its analysis on timing of revenue recognition including for sales of certain telecommunications equipment. Consideration is being given to the accounting for the financing element of long-term contracts for fiber circuit capacity and the timing of expense recognition of costs to obtain a contract. As for financial statement presentation, the Company is evaluating the need to modify its presentation of certain revenue related assets and liabilities in its consolidated balance sheet upon adoption and to provide enhanced revenue related disclosures.

3. Receivables

Receivables consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

	June 30,		December 31,
	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
Customers and other	$	3134,~~817~~344	$	37,408
Allowance for doubtful accounts		(3,~~787~~970)		(4,031)
	$	2830,~~030~~374	$	33,377

4. Long-Lived Assets

Property, plant and equipment consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

	June 30,		December 31,
	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
Property, plant and equipment cost	$	1,~~081~~109,~~757~~539	$	1,036,137
Less accumulated depreciation		(~~480~~501,~~425~~441)		(440,140)
	$	~~601~~608,~~332~~098	$	595,997

Depreciation expense amounted to $21.37 million and $22.05 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Depreciation expense amounted to $4263.19 million and $4365.39 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Table of Contents

The gross carrying amount and accumulated amortization of identifiable intangible assets are as follows (dollars in thousands):

	June 30, 2017						December 31, 2016
	September 30, 2017						December 31, 2016
	Gross				Net		Gross				Net
	Carrying		Accumulated		Carrying		Carrying		Accumulated		Carrying
	Value		Amortization		Value		Value		Amortization		Value
Subject to amortization:
Customer relationships	$	21,709	$	17,~~141~~562	$	4,~~568~~147	$	21,709	$	16,299	$	5,410
Trade name and other		320		~~311~~315		95		320		302		18
		22,029		17,~~452~~877		4,~~577~~152		22,029		16,601		5,428
Not subject to amortization:
Brand name		27,300		—		27,300		27,300		—		27,300
		27,300		—		27,300		27,300		—		27,300
	$	49,329	$	17,~~452~~877	$	31,~~877~~452	$	49,329	$	16,601	$	32,728

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2017, the Company has goodwill of $12.1 million. Prior to 2017, the Company recognized $10.5 million of goodwill as part of the data center services segment and $1.6 million in the telecommunications segment. As further discussed in Note 14, because of recent operational, organizational and reporting changes, the Company has concluded it now has only one segment and one reporting unit. As such, the Company now classifies all goodwill in the one segment.

Amortization expense amounted to $0.4 million and $0.5 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Amortization expense amounted to $01.93 million and $1.16 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Estimated amortization expense for the next five years and thereafter is as follows (dollars in thousands):

Year ended December 31,
2017 (remaining months)	$	~~852~~427
2018		1,307
2019		930
2020		574
2021		270
Thereafter		644
	$	4,~~577~~152

dfjld

5. Accrued Expenses and Other ~~Current~~ Liabilities

Accrued expenses consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

	June 30,		December 31,
	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
Salaries and benefits	$	89,~~093~~584	$	11,662
Interest		12,~~391~~863		2,583
Other taxes		~~949~~879		1,048
	$	1013,~~433~~326	$	15,293

Other current liabilities consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

	June 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
Other postretirement benefits, current	$	3,465	$	3,332
Installment financing contracts, current		2,664		2,157
Other		693		838
	$	6,822	$	6,327

Table of Contents

Other current liabilities consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):


	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
Other postretirement benefits, current	$	3,465	$	3,332
Installment financing contracts, current		2,317		2,157
Other		625		838
	$	6,407	$	6,327

Other liabilities, noncurrent, consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):


	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
Deferred revenue, noncurrent	$	27,978	$	7,453
Installment financing contracts, noncurrent		9,248		8,692
Other		1,813		2,094
	$	39,039	$	18,239

Deferred revenue includes advance billings of capacity and other services related to the Company’s trans-Pacific cable as more fully described in Note 11.

6. Long-Term Debt

Long-term debt consisted of the following (dollars in thousands):

	Average Interest
	Average Interest Rate		Final	September 30,		December 31,
	Rate at June 30,		Final	June 30,		December 31,
	September 30, 2017		Maturity	2017		2016
	2017		Maturity	2017		2016
Term loan A-1	5.06	%	May 4, 2022	$	88,875	$	—
Term loan A-1	4.87	%	May 4, 2022	$	90,000	$	—
Term loan A-2	5.31		May 4, 2023		228,563		—
Term loan A-2	5.12		May 4, 2023		230,000		—
Term loan retired	NA		NA		—		290,138
Debt issue costs and issue discount					(65,~~114~~837)		(5,439)
					313,886		284,699
					311,601		284,699
Current					10,250		3,000
Noncurrent				$	~~303~~301,~~636~~351	$	281,699

In February 2017, the Company entered into a delayed draw credit agreement for new term loans and a new revolving credit facility. The new facility fully funded the repayment of the existing term loan and replacement of the existing revolving credit on May 4, 2017. Included in the new facility is a term loan A-1 for $90.0 million with quarterly principal payments of $1.1 million with the balance due at maturity in May 2022. Interest, payable at least quarterly, is at the Alternate Base Rate plus a margin of 2.75% or a Eurocurrency rate plus a margin of 3.75%. In addition, the facility provides for a second term loan A-2 for $230.0 million with quarterly principal payments of $1.4 million for the first eight quarters and $2.9 million per quarter thereafter with the balance due at maturity in May 2023. Interest, payable at least quarterly, is at the Alternate Base Rate plus a margin of 3.0% or a Eurocurrency rate plus a margin of 4.0%.

The new facility also provides for a line of credit in the amount of $30.0 million with maturity in May 2022. A commitment fee is payable quarterly to the lender under the facility. Interest on the line of credit is at the Alternate Base Rate plus a margin of 2.75% or a Eurocurrency rate plus a margin of 3.75%. There were no drawings as of or for the periods ended September 30, 2017 on the new line of credit.

The interest rate margins on the facility are subject to a decrease of 0.25% with a defined improvement in the Company’s leverage ratio. The obligations under the bank facilities are guaranteed by the Company and each subsidiary with certain exceptions. In addition, the bank credit facilities are collateralized by substantially all of the Company’s assets.

The bank credit facilities contain various negative and affirmative covenants that restrict, among other things, incurrence of additional indebtedness, limitations on the amount of dividends that can be paid, redemptions of stock, other distributions to shareholders and sales of assets. In addition, there are financial covenants consisting of a debt coverage ratio, leverage ratio and a maximum level of capital expenditures.

The Company incurred $6.3 million in underwriting fees, original issue discount and legal costs in 2017 in conjunction with the new debt facility. Such costs and the existing debt original issue discount, deferred financing costs, underwriting fees and legal costs were accounted for in accordance with accounting standards for extinguishment of debt instruments. The Company compared each syndicated lenders’ loan under the old term loan with the syndicated lenders’ loan under the new term loans. All loans under the new term loan were deemed substantially different. As such, the Company deferred the costs of the new debt as a reduction of the carrying value of the new debt. In addition, the Company recognized the repayment of the existing debt instruments as a debt extinguishment incurring a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $4.8 million.

The Company had an existing revolving credit facility which was repaid and terminated on May 4, 2017. Drawings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 amounted to $4.0 million and $10.0 million, respectively. Such draws were used primarily to fund the construction of the SEA-US submarine cable system described in Note 11. There were no amounts drawn as of or for the six months ended June 30, 2016.

Table of Contents

~~One~~The ofbank ~~the~~credit ~~syndicated~~facilities ~~lenders~~contain invarious ~~both~~negative ~~the new term loan~~ and ~~the~~affirmative ~~term~~covenants ~~loan~~that ~~retired~~restrict, isamong aother ~~cooperative bank owned by its customers. Annually~~things, ~~this~~incurrence ~~bank distributes patronage in the form~~ of ~~cash~~additional ~~and~~indebtedness, ~~stock~~limitations ~~in the cooperative based~~ on the ~~Company’s~~amount ~~average~~of ~~outstanding~~dividends ~~loan~~that ~~balance. The~~can ~~Company~~be ~~recognizes~~paid, ~~the~~redemptions ~~patronage~~of stock, ~~generally~~other asdistributions ~~declared,~~to asshareholders aand ~~reduction~~sales of ~~interest expense~~assets. ~~The~~ ~~stock~~In ~~component~~addition, isthere ~~recognized~~are atfinancial ~~its~~covenants ~~stated~~consisting ~~cost~~of ~~basis~~a ~~with~~debt ~~the~~coverage ~~accumulated~~ratio, ~~stock~~leverage ~~investment~~ratio ~~included~~and ina ~~other~~maximum ~~noncurrent~~level ~~assets. The investment balance as~~ of ~~June~~capital ~~30, 2017 was not significant~~expenditures.

The Company had an existing revolving credit facility which was repaid and terminated on May 4, 2017. Drawings for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 amounted to $10.0 million. Such draws were used primarily to fund the construction of the SEA-US submarine cable system described in Note 11. There were no amounts drawn as of or for the nine months ended September 30, 2016.

One of the syndicated lenders in both the new term loan and the term loan retired is a cooperative bank owned by its customers. Annually, this bank distributes patronage in the form of cash and stock in the cooperative based on the Company’s average outstanding loan balance. The Company recognizes the patronage, generally as declared, as a reduction of interest expense. The stock component is recognized at its stated cost basis with the accumulated stock investment included in other noncurrent assets. The investment balance as of September 30, 2017 was not significant.

Maturities

The annual requirements for principal payments on long-term debt as of ~~June~~September 30, 2017 are as follows (dollars in thousands):

Year ended December 31,
2017 (remaining months)	$	52,~~125~~563
2018		10,250
2019		13,125
2020		16,000
2021		16,000
Thereafter		259,500
	$	~~320~~317,~~000~~438

Capitalized Interest

Interest capitalized by the Company amounted to $0.65 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Interest capitalized by the Company amounted to $1.16 million and $01.71 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Table of Contents

7. Employee Benefit Plans

The Company sponsors a defined benefit pension plan, with benefits frozen as of March 1, 2012, and postretirement health and life insurance benefits for union employees. The Company also sponsors a cash balance pension plan for nonunion employees, with benefits frozen as of April 1, 2007, and certain management employees receive postretirement health and life insurance under grandfathered provisions of a formerly active plan.

The following provides the components of benefit costs (income) for the applicable periods (dollars in thousands):

Pension

Three Months Ended

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended

June 30,

September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

Interest cost

1,~~719~~626

1,~~996~~703

35,~~500~~126

35,~~992~~695

Expected asset return

(2,~~573~~576)

(2,~~678~~159)

(57,~~228~~805)

(57,~~355~~513)

Amortization of loss

~~116~~120

~~129~~136

~~241~~361

~~257~~392

Net periodic benefit income

(~~738~~830)

(~~553~~320)

(12,~~487~~318)

(1,~~106~~426)

Settlement loss

~~314~~1,090

—486

23,~~270~~360

—486

Total benefit (income) expense

~~(424)~~260

~~(553)~~166

~~783~~1,042

(~~1,106~~940)

Table of Contents

Other Postretirement Benefits

	Three Months Ended				~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	September 30,				September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Service cost	$	215	$	259	$	~~468~~683	$	~~518~~777
Interest cost		532		655		1,~~128~~661		1,~~310~~964
Amortization of (gain) loss		(213)		119		(~~251~~464)		~~237~~356
Total benefit expense	$	534	$	1,033	$	1,~~345~~880	$	23,~~065~~097

During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, the Company’s pension plans for union employees and management employees paid lump-sum benefits to certain plan participants in full settlement of obligations due amounting to $1.6.8 million and $1219.21 million, ~~respectively~~for the respective periods. This resulted in the recognition of a loss on settlement for both pension plans. Because of the settlements, the Company measured its pension plan obligations and plan assets as of ~~March~~each ~~31,~~quarter ~~2017 and June 30, 2017~~end. The Company used a discount ~~rate~~rates of ranging from 3.6156% to 3.57% as of ~~June~~September 30, 2017 to measure the pension plan obligations. The new measurements resulted in recognition in other comprehensive income (loss) of a ~~loss~~gain of $02.87 million and ~~a gain of~~ $03.85 million for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, respectively. ~~For the six months ended June 30, 2016, lump sum benefits paid did not exceed the threshold requiring settlement accounting.~~

InDuring ~~January~~the ~~2017~~three months ended September 30, 2016, the Company ~~amended~~determined ~~the~~it ~~postretirement~~was ~~health~~probable lump sum benefits ~~plan~~paid for ~~management~~its ~~employees~~union bypension ~~implementing~~plan ain ~~cap~~2016 onwould exceed the ~~amount~~threshold ofrequiring settlement accounting. Actual lump sum benefits paid by the ~~premium~~union ~~subsidy~~plan atamounted ~~2017~~to ~~levels~~$2. 4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2016. This resulted in recognition of a ~~negative~~loss ~~plan~~on ~~amendment~~settlement asfor ofthe ~~January~~union ~~31,~~plan ~~2017. Because~~during of the ~~plan~~three ~~amendment~~and nine months ended September 30, ~~the~~2016 amounting to $0.5 million. The Company ~~measured~~used ~~its~~a ~~management~~discount ~~postretirement~~rate ~~benefits~~of ~~obligation~~3.28% as of ~~January~~September 3130, ~~2017~~2016 ~~using~~to ameasure ~~discount~~the ~~rate~~union ofplan 4benefit obligation.~~07%.~~ The new measurement resulted in a retirement plan ~~gain~~loss which was recognized in other comprehensive ~~income~~loss of $198.79 million for the ~~six~~three and nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2017~~2016. For the nine months ended September 30, 2016, lump sum benefits paid for the management pension plan did not exceed the threshold requiring settlement accounting.

The Company previously disclosed in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 that it expected to contribute $4.8 million to its pension plan in 2017. For the six months ended June 30, 2017, the Company has made contributions to the plan amounting to $1.5 million. The Company presently expects to contribute the full amount during the remainder of 2017. 15

Table of Contents

In January 2017, the Company amended the postretirement health benefits plan for management employees by implementing a cap on the amount of the premium subsidy at 2017 levels. This resulted in recognition of a negative plan amendment as of January 31, 2017. Because of the plan amendment, the Company measured its management postretirement benefits obligation as of January 31, 2017 using a discount rate of 4.07%. The new measurement resulted in a retirement plan gain which was recognized in other comprehensive income of $19.7 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

The Company previously disclosed in its consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2016 that it expected to contribute $4.8 million to its pension plan in 2017. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company has made contributions to the plan amounting to $3.0 million. The Company presently expects to contribute the full amount during the remainder of 2017.

8. Income Taxes

The income tax provision (benefit) differs from the amounts determined by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 34% to the income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit) for the following reasons (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months Ended				~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	September 30,				September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Income tax at federal rate	$	(1,999)	$	818	$	(3,134)	$	906
Income tax (benefit) at federal rate	$	(1,781)	$	(154)	$	(4,915)	$	752
Increase (decrease) resulting from:
State income taxes, net of federal income tax		(~~233~~224)		~~134~~(3)		(~~356~~580)		~~146~~143
Expense not deductible for tax		—		~~144~~36		—		~~160~~196
Tax credit included in taxable income		99(21)		—		~~192~~171		—
Other permanent differences		2035		~~101~~21		72107		~~105~~126
Capital goods excise tax credit		~~(289)~~62		(~~237~~74)		(~~562~~500)		(~~251~~325)
Total income tax provision (benefit)	$	(2,402)	$	960	$	(3,788)	$	1,066
Change in valuation allowance		89,410		—		89,410		—
Total income tax provision (benefit)	$	87,481	$	(174)	$	83,693	$	892

~~The~~Deferred ~~Company~~income ~~evaluates~~tax ~~its~~assets ~~tax~~and ~~positions~~liabilities ~~for~~are ~~liability~~determined ~~recognition. As~~based ofon ~~June~~the ~~30,~~differences ~~2017,~~between the ~~Company~~financial ~~had~~reporting noand ~~unrecognized~~ tax ~~benefits. No~~bases ~~interest~~of orassets ~~penalties~~and ~~related~~liabilities toat ~~income~~each ~~tax~~balance ~~assessments~~sheet ~~were~~date ~~recognized~~using inenacted ~~the~~tax ~~Company’s~~rates ~~condensed~~expected ~~consolidated~~to ~~statements~~be ofin ~~income~~effect ~~(loss)~~in ~~for~~ the ~~three~~year ordifferences ~~six~~are ~~months~~expected ~~ended~~to ~~June~~reverse. Valuation ~~30,~~allowances ~~2017~~are ~~and~~recognized ~~2016. All~~to ~~tax~~reduce ~~years~~deferred ~~from~~income ~~2013~~tax ~~remain~~assets ~~open~~to ~~for~~the ~~both~~amount ~~federal~~that ~~and~~will ~~Hawaii~~more ~~state~~likely ~~tax~~than ~~purposes~~not be realized.

15The Company assesses the ability to realize its deferred tax assets and assesses the need for a valuation allowance on an ongoing basis. The Company is required to consider all available positive and negative evidence in evaluating the likelihood that it will be able to realize the benefit of its deferred tax assets in the future. Such evidence includes scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and the results of recent operations.

In considering the impact of recent operations on the Company’s deferred tax asset assessment, the Company utilizes a rolling three years of actual and current year anticipated results as the primary measure of cumulative income or losses. These are adjusted for permanent differences between financial reporting and taxable income. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, the Company incurred a pretax loss from operations. In addition, as of September 30, 2017, the Company had a cumulative loss from operations for the three year period. Because of the three year cumulative losses, the Company is required to look only to sources of income that are deemed objective and verifiable based on historical experience. The Company considered that the cumulative loss was caused, in part, by costs not expected to recur in future periods such as merger costs. However, the loss was also caused by costs, such as pension settlement losses, that are not deemed part of core operations but the frequency of which is hard to predict. For example, in the third quarter of 2017, the level of retirements and related pension settlements ramped up making it more challenging to conclude such expenses will not recur in future periods. With the challenge of predicting future taxable income based on actual historical results, the Company had to limit the amount of taxable income included in its assessment of deferred income tax asset recoverability.

Table of Contents

Based on the more likely than not criteria for realization of deferred income tax assets, the Company established a full valuation allowance for its deferred income tax assets as of September 30, 2017. If, in future periods, new positive evidence becomes available, the conclusion regarding the need for a full valuation allowance may change resulting in the reversal of some or all of the valuation allowance.

The Company evaluates its tax positions for liability recognition. As of September 30, 2017, the Company had no unrecognized tax benefits. No interest or penalties related to income tax assessments were recognized in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of income (loss) for the three or nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016. All tax years from 2013 remain open for both federal and Hawaii state tax purposes.

9. Stock Compensation

The Company has an equity incentive plan. The Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors may grant awards under the plan in the form of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units and other stock-based awards. The maximum number of shares issuable under the equity incentive plan is 1,400,000 shares with ~~468~~467,~~275~~891 shares remaining to be issued at ~~June~~September 30, 2017. All grants under the equity incentive plan will be issued to acquire shares at the fair value on date of grant.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2017, all awards were restricted stock units. Activity with respect to outstanding restricted stock units for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016 was as follows:

		Weighted-
		Average
		Grant-Date Fair
	Shares	Value per Share
2017
Nonvested at January 1, 2017	226,690	$	25
Granted	~~163~~164,~~890~~190		24
Vested	(78,623)		25
Forfeited	(1,167)		21
Nonvested at June 30, 2017	310,790	$	25
Nonvested at September 30, 2017	311,090	$	25
2016
Nonvested at January 1, 2016	174,518	$	26
Granted	~~121~~127,~~724~~360		25
Vested	(6061,~~425~~453)		25
Forfeited	(712,~~941~~537)		2625
Nonvested at June 30, 2016	227,876	$	26
Nonvested at September 30, 2016	227,888	$	25

The Company recognized compensation expense of $0.78 million and $0.6 million for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company recognized compensation expense of $12.31 million and $1.17 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The fair value as of the vesting date for the restricted stock units that vested during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016 was $1.3 million and $0.9 million, respectively. Upon vesting, unit holders have the option to net share-settle to cover the required withholding tax and the remaining amount is converted into an equivalent number of shares of common stock. The total shares withheld were 20,996 and 15,~~234~~351 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and were based on the value of the restricted stock units as determined by the Company’s closing stock price on the date of vesting. Total payments for the employees’ tax obligations to the tax authorities amounted to $0.5 million and $0.4 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Other than reimbursements for tax withholdings, there was no cash received under the restricted stock unit arrangements.

The Company also has a performance based compensation plan. The incentive compensation is settled in March of each year for the prior year services and is based on Company performance relative to certain company specific metrics. The Company recognizes the expense during the performance period based on the expected compensation amount. Beginning for the 2016 performance period, a specified portion of the compensation amount for certain employees are settled in Company shares based on the share price at the date of settlement. The estimated performance based compensation to be settled in stock was not significant for the three months ended June 30, 2017 and amounted to $0.2 million for the three months ended June 30, 2016. The estimated performance based compensation to be settled in stock amounted to $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The fair value of the shares granted under the plan in March 2017 amounted to $0.7 million. Upon grant, employees were required to net share-settle to cover the required withholding tax. Total payments for the employees’ tax obligations to the tax authorities by the Company amounted to $0.3 million. The net shares issued amounted to 17~~,174 shares which was based on the value of shares on the date of vesting.~~

Table of Contents

The Company also has a performance based compensation plan. The incentive compensation is settled in March of each year for the prior year services and is based on Company performance relative to certain company specific metrics. The Company recognizes the expense during the performance period based on the expected compensation amount. Beginning for the 2016 performance period, a specified portion of the compensation amount for certain employees are settled in Company shares based on the share price at the date of settlement. The estimated performance based compensation to be settled in stock amounted to $0.1 and $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The estimated performance based compensation to be settled in stock amounted to $0.3 million and $0.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The fair value of the shares granted under the plan in March 2017 amounted to $0.7 million. Upon grant, employees were required to net share-settle to cover the required withholding tax. Total payments for the employees’ tax obligations to the tax authorities by the Company amounted to $0.3 million. The net shares issued amounted to 17,174 shares which was based on the value of shares on the date of vesting.

10. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The balance of and all of the changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss as of and for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, net of tax, are attributed to the Company’s retirement plans.

Reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss were as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Three Months Ended				~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
	June 30,				June 30,
	September 30,				September 30,
	2017		2016		2017		2016
Retirement plans
Amortization of gain/loss and settlement loss	$	~~217~~997	$	~~247~~741	$	23,~~260~~257	$	~~494~~1,234
Income tax provision on comprehensive income		(82379)		(94282)		(~~859~~1,238)		(~~188~~469)
Total	$	~~135~~618	$	~~153~~459	$	12,~~401~~019	$	~~306~~765

The amortization of gains and losses, and settlement loss were recognized primarily in selling, general and administrative expense for the periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016.

11. Commitments and Contingencies

Trans-Pacific Submarine Cable

In August 2014, the Company joined several other telecommunication companies to build and operate a trans-Pacific submarine cable system. The total system cost isamounted ~~expected~~ to be $235 million and is primarily composed of a supply contract with the lead contractor. The Company ~~will~~has ~~contribute~~contributed $25 million over the multi-year construction period in exchange for a fractional ownership in the system. The Company ~~will~~recognized ~~recognize~~ its fractional share of the cost. In addition, the Company ~~will~~constructed ~~construct~~ a cable landing station in Hawaii and ~~provide~~is providing cable landing services. The system iswas ~~expected to be~~ completed in August 2017. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2017, the Company had incurred capital costs of $1924.50 million primarily to the cable contractor for construction with all such costs capitalized ~~to telephone plant under construction~~.

The Company ~~will~~has ~~have~~ excess capacity on its share of the trans-Pacific cable that it will make available to other carriers for a fee. The Company has contracted and expects to enter into additional contracts with other carriers for long-term indefeasible right of use, or IRU, agreements for fiber circuit capacity. The Company may receive up-front payments for services to be delivered over a period of up to 25 years. ~~The~~As of September 30, 2017, the Company has entered into agreements for the sale of capacity and other services for $2729.05 million ~~plus fees to activate assigned capacity~~, ~~and~~the ~~for~~majority ~~operations and maintenance. As~~ of ~~June~~which ~~30,~~has ~~2017,~~been ~~the Company had~~ received in up-front payments ~~of $7~~.2 ~~million.~~ As provided for in one of the agreements, funds of $5.0 million ~~are~~were held in escrow. ~~The~~and ~~funds~~released in ~~escrow~~August ~~will~~2017 ~~be released to the Company~~ when the trans-Pacific cable iswas ready for service. The restricted cash iswas previously reflected in other current assets in the condensed consolidated balance sheet. A liability to provide services in the future for all up-front payments is included in advance billings and customer deposits and other liabilities. The Company ~~will~~is ~~recognize~~recognizing revenue for the circuits, ~~beginning upon activation of the services,~~ on a straight-line basis over the contract term.

~~Connect America Fund Phase II~~18

In conjunction with reforming the Universal Service Fund, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) established the Connect America Fund (“CAF”) which provides incremental support to broadband service providers. CAF Phase II is the long-term component of the program. In August 2015, the Company notified the FCC that it was accepting CAF Phase II support which amounts to $4.4 million in annual funding. Support is retroactive through the beginning of 2015 and will continue for six years. Under the terms of the CAF Phase II, the Company will offer broadband service at 10 Mbps downstream and 1 Mbps upstream or better to approximately 11,000 eligible locations in high-cost areas in the State of Hawaii and will provide voice and broadband services at reasonable rates. For the three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized $1.1 million and $1.1 million, respectively, in CAF Phase II funding as revenue. For the six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized $2.2 million and $2.2 million, respectively, in CAF Phase II funding as revenue.

Table of Contents

Connect America Fund Phase II

In conjunction with reforming the Universal Service Fund, the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) established the Connect America Fund (“CAF”) which provides incremental support to broadband service providers. CAF Phase II is the long-term component of the program. In August 2015, the Company notified the FCC that it was accepting CAF Phase II support which amounts to $4.4 million in annual funding. Support is retroactive through the beginning of 2015 and will continue for six years. Under the terms of the CAF Phase II, the Company will offer broadband service at 10 Mbps downstream and 1 Mbps upstream or better to approximately 11,000 eligible locations in high-cost areas in the State of Hawaii and will provide voice and broadband services at reasonable rates. On a cumulative basis, as of December 31, 2017, the Company has an interim deployment obligation for approximately 4,400 locations. As of September 30, 2017, the Company had deployed to approximately 2,300 locations and expects to meet all of its interim and final deployment obligations. For the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized $1.1 million and $1.1 million, respectively, in CAF Phase II funding as revenue. For the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, the Company recognized $3.3 million and $3.3 million, respectively, in CAF Phase II funding as revenue.

Collective Bargaining Agreement

The Company has a collective bargaining agreement with the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 1357 (“IBEW”) that expires on December 31, 2017. The agreement covers approximately half of the Company’s work force.

Third Party Claims

In the normal course of conducting its business, the Company is involved in various disputes with third parties, including vendors and customers. The outcome of such disputes is generally uncertain and subject to commercial negotiations. The Company periodically assesses its liabilities in connection with these matters and records reserves for those matters where it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the loss can be reasonably estimated. Based on management’s most recent assessment, the Company believes that the risk of loss in excess of liabilities recorded is not material for all outstanding claims and disputes and the ultimate outcome of such matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

Joint-Owned Utility Poles

Each of the electric utilities for the four counties in the State of Hawaii have separate agreements with the Company for the joint ownership and maintenance of utility poles along with other third parties, such as the State of Hawaii. The agreements set forth various circumstances requiring pole removal, installation and replacement and the sharing of costs among the joint pole owners. The agreements allow for the cost of work done by one joint pole owner to be shared by the other joint pole owners based on the apportionment of costs in the agreements. Generally, the electric utilities have maintained, replaced and installed the majority of the jointly-owned poles and have billed the other joint pole owners for their respective share of the costs. The Company has a disagreement with the common owner of the utilities in three of the counties in Hawaii regarding the amount the utilities are requesting for their share of the capitalized costs.

For one of the three utilities referenced above, a dispute resolution process is proceeding as specified by the joint pole agreement. For another of the utilities, a complaint for payment was filed by the utility with the State court in 2016. The Company has negotiated the structure for a potential resolution of the dispute with the three utilities. However, implementation depends on entering into various binding agreements with the utilities and approval of the Hawaii Public Utilities Commission with its jurisdiction over both the Company and the utilities. Management of the Company believes the amount recognized in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements for amounts due the utilities are reflective of what is owed and a reasonable estimate of the final settlement to be reached with the utilities.

Table of Contents

Litigation

The Company is involved in litigation arising in the normal course of business. The outcome of litigation is not expected to have a material adverse impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

12. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The following method and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practical to estimate the fair value.

Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable – The carrying amount approximates fair value. The valuation is based on settlements of similar financial instruments all of which are short-term in nature and generally settled at or near cost. Cash and cash equivalents is measured at Level 1.

Debt – The fair value of ~~the new~~ debt outstanding as of ~~June~~September 30, 2017 is estimated at its present value using current market rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The fair value of previously held debt as of December 31, 2016 was based on the value at which the debt was trading among holders.

Table of Contents

The estimated fair value of financial instruments is as follows (dollars in thousands):

	Carrying		Fair
	Value		Value
June 30, 2017
September 30, 2017
Liabilities - long-term debt (carried at cost)		~~313~~311,~~886~~601		~~320~~317,~~514~~927
December 31, 2016
Liabilities - long-term debt (carried at cost)		284,699		293,765

Fair Value Measurements

The objective of the fair value measurement is to estimate the price at which an orderly transaction to sell the asset or to transfer the liability would take place between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions.

Accounting standards establish a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurement).

Liabilities carried at amortized cost with fair value disclosure on a recurring basis represent long-term debt. A summary is as follows (dollars in thousands):

	June 30,		December 31,
	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
Liability value measurements using:
Quoted prices in active markets for identical liabilities (Level 1)	$	—	$	—
Significant other observable inputs (Level 2)		~~320~~317,~~514~~927		293,765
Significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)		—		—
	$	~~320~~317,~~514~~927	$	293,765

Table of Contents

13. Cash Flow Information

Supplemental cash flow information is as follows:

	Six Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended
	June 30,
	September 30,
	2017		2016
Cash paid during the year:
Income taxes paid	$	—	$	—
Interest paid, net of amounts capitalized		810,~~116~~517		69,~~350~~938
Non-cash investing activities - capital assets acquired under installment contracts		12,~~334~~423		—
Non-cash financing activities - common shares issued for performance based compensation, net of withholding taxes paid		400		—

The Company includes restricted cash with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown in the statement of cash flows effective with issuance of a new accounting standard in November 2016. Retrospective application of the new standard was required so the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2016 ~~were~~was revised to reflect application of the new standard. This resulted in an increase to the beginning and ending reported cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash previously reported in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flow of $3.8 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2016.

Table of Contents

The following is a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash reported in the condensed consolidated balance sheets to the total of such amounts in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows (dollars in thousands):

	June 30,		December 31,
	September 30,		December 31,
	2017		2016
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2544,~~854~~723	$	15,821
Restricted cash included in other current assets
Escrow deposits for capacity sales		~~5,000~~—		5,000
Restricted cash included in other assets
Other		~~325~~250		325
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash	$	3144,~~179~~973	$	21,146

The escrow deposits for capacity sales are more fully described in Note 11. The restriction on the escrow deposits iswas ~~expected to be~~ removed in the third quarter of 2017 ~~so the restricted cash amount is reflected in other current assets as of June 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016~~.

Table of Contents

14. Segment Information and Revenue by Channel

The Company prior to 2017 operated in two reportable segments of telecommunications and data center services. This conclusion was based on how resources were allocated and assessed by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, the Company’s chief operating decision maker. The Company had initially formed the data center services segment in 2013 with the expectation that the segment would operate independently and focus on colocation services. The Company’s strategy has evolved to emphasize a bundle of telecommunication services to its customers including colocation. In addition, the Company is focusing its efforts on obtaining the benefit of cross selling services and gaining efficiencies of a more integrated operation. With this change in strategy, the Company has implemented certain operational, organizational and reporting changes. Among the changes is the Chief Executive Officer is no longer provided information with which to separately evaluate the data center services segment or any other component for standalone performance or resource allocation. Hence, given the integrated nature of the Company’s telecommunication operations, including its leveraging of its primary network to provide the majority of its services, management has concluded the Company now has only one segment.

The following table provides information on the Company’s revenue by channel (dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended

~~Six~~Nine Months Ended

June 30,

September 30,

2017

2016

2017

2016

Business services

41,~~651~~860

4644,~~672~~797

85127,~~501~~363

91136,~~515~~312

Consumer services

33,~~831~~688

35,~~952~~680

68101,~~093~~780

72107,~~159~~838

Wholesale carrier data

12,~~601~~567

13,~~172~~440

2537,~~430~~997

2640,~~934~~373

Other

32,~~215~~898

3,~~745~~931

69,~~784~~681

711,~~727~~660

91,~~298~~013

9997,~~541~~848

~~185~~276,~~808~~821

~~198~~296,~~335~~183

2022

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of

Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance (including our anticipated cost structure) and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continues,” “assumption” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements (including statements related to our anticipated cost structure) are only predictions. Actual events or results may differ materially from those anticipated or projected due to a number of factors. These factors include, but are not limited to:

· the effect of the announcement and pendency of the proposed merger agreement, including the outcome of any legal proceeding related to the merger transaction;

changes in demand for our products and services;

our ability to fund capital expenditures for network enhancements;

failures in critical back-office systems and IT infrastructure;

our ability to retain experienced personnel;

our ability to enter into a new collective bargaining agreement;

a breach of our data security systems;

our ability to provide customers with reliable and uninterrupted service;

the ability to maintain arrangements with third-party service providers;

changes in regulations and legislation applicable to providers of telecommunications services;

the ability of our operating subsidiaries to distribute funds or assets to the parent company;

a reduction in rates we are allowed to charge our customers as dictated by regulatory authorities;

technological changes affecting the telecommunications industry;

our ability to continue to license or enforce the intellectual property rights on which our business depends;

failure to renegotiate contracts with television content providers on acceptable terms or at all;

economic conditions in Hawaii;

our ability to utilize net operating loss carryforwards or fund tax payments;

the effect our indebtedness could have on our financial condition;

the effect of severe weather and natural disasters;

the ability of a few large shareholders to influence corporate decisions; and

the effect future sales of a substantial amount of common stock may have on our stock price.

These and other factors may cause our actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statement. Refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K and Part II, Item 1A, Risk Factors, for a detailed discussion of risks that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial may also materially adversely affect our business operations.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. These forward-looking statements are made as of the date of issuance of these quarterly condensed consolidated financial statements, we assume no obligation to update or revise them or to provide reasons why actual results may differ.

We do not undertake any responsibility to release any revisions to these forward-looking statements to take into account events or circumstances that occur after the date of issuance of these quarterly condensed consolidated financial statements. Additionally, we do not undertake any responsibility to update you on the occurrence of any unanticipated events which may cause actual results to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this quarterly report.23

Table of Contents

Significant Recent Development

On July 9, 2017, Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc. (“Holdco”), a Delaware corporation, Cincinnati Bell Inc. (“Cincinnati Bell”), an Ohio corporation, Twin Acquisition Corp., a Delaware corporation and a wholly owned subsidiary of Cincinnati (“Merger Sub”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”), pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into Holdco and Holdco will be the surviving corporation (the “Merger”). On November 7, 2917, our stockholders approved the Merger but the Merger remains subject to regulatory approvals.

The announcement and pendency of the Merger may adversely affect our business due to customers’ uncertainty and employee and other disruptions as well as intensified competition from our competitors as they attempt to take advantage of the uncertainties. We are actively managing the Merger process through enhanced communication and outreach to key stakeholders including customers, employees, community members and suppliers.

Background

In the following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations, unless the context otherwise requires, “we,” “us” or the “Company” refers, collectively, to Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Sources of Revenue

We derive revenue from the following sources in three main customer channels:

Business Channel

Business data services include high bandwidth data products such as Ethernet, Routed Network Services and Dedicated Internet Access along with traditional High-Speed Internet (“HSI”) for business customers and VoIP. Business VoIP, also referred to as BVoIP, is a unified hosted communications solution for business that includes digital voice services bundled with internet service.

Voice services include local telephone service for business customers. These revenues include monthly charges for basic service and enhanced calling features such as voice mail, caller ID and 3-way calling. Voice also includes long distance services and subscriber line charges prescribed by the Federal Communications Commission and imposed on voice customers.

Hosted and managed services includes physical colocation, virtual colocation and various related security, network management and network installation related services.

Equipment and related services includes installation and maintenance of business customer premise equipment as well as managed service for customer telephone and IT networks.

Consumer Channel

Video services are marketed as Hawaiian Telcom TV which includes digital television as well as advanced entertainment services. High-Speed Internet services are provided to residential customers as well. Voice services include basic local phone and long distance services, as well as enhanced features.

Table of Contents

Wholesale Channel

Wholesale revenue represents wholesale carrier data services provided to both wireline and wireless carriers.

Table of Contents

Other

We receive revenue from various other sources such as wireless services which includes the sale of wireless handsets and other wireless accessories, and switched carrier access which compensates us for origination, transport and termination of calls for long distance and other interexchange carriers. Also included in other revenue is government subsidies generally to provide service in rural or isolated areas.

Results of Operations for the Three and ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016

For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, the Company incurred a net loss of $392.57 million and $598.41 million, respectively. For the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2016, the Company had ~~net~~a ~~income~~nominal ~~of $1.4 million and $1.6 million, respectively. The~~ loss ~~in 2017 is attributed, in part, to a loss on the early extinguishment~~ of ~~debt for both the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 of~~ $40.83 million. InFor ~~addition, for~~ the ~~three~~nine ~~and six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2017~~2016, ~~we incurred pension settlement losses and other related costs of $0.3 million and $4.0 million, respectively, associated with a higher level of retirements in~~ the ~~early~~Company ~~part~~had ofnet ~~2017. We~~income ~~expect the refinancing to result in more financial flexibility and lower interest cost. The retirements are expected to result in our labor expense declining by an annual average~~ of $1.53 million ~~on a net reduction of 20 employees~~.

The net loss for the current year periods was most significantly impacted by the income tax provision of $87.5 million and $83.7 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively. In part, because of recent pretax losses from operations, the Company concluded it was not appropriate to factor in future income in its assessment of the realization of deferred income tax assets. As such we established a full valuation allowance for our deferred income tax assets as of September 30, 2017 resulting in the large income tax provision.

The loss before the income tax provision was impacted by several factors. We incurred professional fees related to the proposed merger of $2.0 million and $2.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively. For the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2017, we incurred pension settlement losses of $1.1 million and $3.4 million, respectively, associated with a higher level of retirements starting in the early part of 2017. In addition, for the nine month period, we incurred a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of $4.8 million.

Operating Revenues

The following tables summarize our volume information (lines or subscribers) as of ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, and our operating revenues for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016. For comparability, we also present volume information as of ~~June~~September 30, 2017 compared to ~~March~~June 3130, 2017.

Volume information includes certain information by lines. The line counts represent the number of billed units as of the end of the period as reflected in the records of our primary billing system. The separation of units by the business and consumer channel is based on the customer account designation in the billing system which is generally consistent with how revenue information is separated by channel. Business data lines represent digital subscriber lines used to provide internet services. Video service subscribers are determined with a count of individual customers as reflected in our primary billing system as of period end. For bulk contracts for multi dwelling units, we count individual residences subject to the bulk contract. Video homes enabled is estimated based on a count of single family homes and homes in multi dwelling units that are able to obtain our television service as of the period end.

Beginning in 2017, we discontinued separate reporting of data center services revenue. As discussed in Note 14 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, we no longer separately report data center services as a separate segment. All revenue is now reported by its nature on a companywide basis. Prior period information has been revised to reflect the current presentation.

~~Volume Information~~25

As of June 30, 2017 compared to June 30, 2016

	June 30,		Change
	2017	2016	Number	Percentage
Business
Data lines	18,917	19,851	(934)	(4.7)	%
BVoIP lines	20,666	18,101	2,565	14.2	%
Voice access lines	155,743	163,860	(8,117)	(5.0)	%
Consumer
Video subscribers	43,235	38,593	4,642	12.0	%
Internet lines	90,073	91,820	(1,747)	(1.9)	%
Voice access lines	127,134	143,441	(16,307)	(11.4)	%
Homes enabled for video	204,000	198,000	6,000	3.0	%

Table of Contents

AsVolume ~~of June 30, 2017 compared to March 31, 2017~~Information

	June 30,	March 31,	Change
	2017	2017	Number	Percentage
Business
Data lines	18,917	19,341	(424)	(2.2)	%
BVoIP lines	20,666	20,034	632	3.2	%
Voice access lines	155,743	158,621	(2,878)	(1.8)	%
Consumer
Video subscribers	43,235	42,771	464	1.1	%
Internet lines	90,073	90,693	(620)	(0.7)	%
Voice access lines	127,134	131,142	(4,008)	(3.1)	%
Homes enabled for video	204,000	203,000	1,000	0.5	%

As of September 30, 2017 compared to September 30, 2016


	September 30,		Change
	2017	2016	Number	Percentage
Business
Data lines	18,530	19,754	(1,224)	(6.2)	%
BVoIP lines	21,421	18,593	2,828	15.2	%
Voice access lines	153,273	162,587	(9,314)	(5.7)	%

Consumer
Video subscribers	44,312	39,774	4,538	11.4	%
Internet lines	90,563	91,000	(437)	(0.5)	%
Voice access lines	123,738	139,167	(15,429)	(11.1)	%
Homes enabled for video	205,000	201,000	4,000	2.0	%

As of September 30, 2017 compared to June 30, 2017


	September 30,	June 30,	Change
	2017	2017	Number	Percentage
Business
Data lines	18,530	18,917	(387)	(2.0)	%
BVoIP lines	21,421	20,666	755	3.7	%
Voice access lines	153,273	155,743	(2,470)	(1.6)	%

Consumer
Video subscribers	44,312	43,235	1,077	2.5	%
Internet lines	90,563	90,073	490	0.5	%
Voice access lines	123,738	127,134	(3,396)	(2.7)	%
Homes enabled for video	205,000	204,000	1,000	0.5	%

Operating Revenues (dollars in thousands)

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,				Change
	September 30,				Change
	2017		2016		Amount		Percentage
Business
Data services	$	1514,~~002~~876	$	1815,~~037~~426	$	(~~3,035~~550)	(163.86)	%
Voice services		20,~~733~~431		21,~~751~~687		(1,~~018~~256)	(45.78)	%
Hosted and managed services		1,~~642~~503		1,~~706~~523		(6420)	(31.83)	%
Equipment and related services		45,~~274~~050		56,~~178~~161		(~~904~~1,111)	(1718.50)	%
		41,651		46,672		(5,021)	(10.8)	%
		41,860		44,797		(2,937)	(6.6)	%
Consumer
Video services		1011,~~806~~103		910,~~997~~483		~~809~~620	85.19	%
Internet services		6,~~619~~639		7,~~328~~053		(~~709~~414)	(95.79)	%
Voice services		1615,~~406~~946		18,~~627~~144		(2,~~221~~198)	(1112.91)	%
		33,831		35,952		(2,121)	(5.9)	%
		33,688		35,680		(1,992)	(5.6)	%
Wholesale carrier data		12,~~601~~567		13,~~172~~440		(~~571~~873)	(46.35)	%
Other		32,~~215~~898		3,~~745~~931		(~~530~~1,033)	(1426.23)	%
	$	91,~~298~~013	$	9997,~~541~~848	$	(86,~~243~~835)	(87.30)	%

2426

Table of Contents

Operating Revenues, continued (dollars in thousands)

	Six Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended
	June 30,				Change
	September 30,				Change
	2017		2016		Amount		Percentage
Business
Data services	$	3045,~~619~~495	$	3449,~~421~~847	$	(34,~~802~~352)	(118.07)	%
Voice services		4162,~~991~~423		4465,~~164~~851		(23,~~173~~428)	(45.92)	%
Hosted and managed services		34,~~174~~677		34,~~287~~810		(~~113~~133)	(32.48)	%
Equipment and related services		914,~~717~~768		915,~~643~~804		74(1,036)	0(6.86)	%
		85,501		91,515		(6,014)	(6.6)	%
		127,363		136,312		(8,949)	(6.6)	%
Consumer
Video services		2132,~~400~~502		1929,~~424~~907		12,~~976~~595	108.27	%
Internet services		1319,~~300~~940		1522,~~053~~106		(12,~~753~~166)	(119.68)	%
Voice services		3349,~~393~~338		3755,~~682~~825		(46,~~289~~487)	(11.46)	%
		68,093		72,159		(4,066)	(5.6)	%
		101,780		107,838		(6,058)	(5.6)	%
Wholesale carrier data		2537,~~430~~997		2640,~~934~~373		(12,~~504~~376)	(5.69)	%
Other		69,~~784~~681		711,~~727~~660		(~~943~~1,979)	(1217.20)	%
	$	~~185~~276,~~808~~821	$	~~198~~296,~~335~~183	$	(1219,~~527~~362)	(6.35)	%

Business Channel

The Company continues to transform its business channel by replacing traditional voice services with next generation strategic services. The Company considers strategic service revenues in the business channel to include business data services, and hosted and managed services.

Business data services, including internet and BVoIP, decreased for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 ~~decreased~~ compared to the same periods in the prior year. Demand ~~primarily~~for ~~due~~data toservices ~~non-recurring~~continues ~~fees~~to ~~associated~~rise ~~with~~as ~~one~~reflected ~~large~~in ~~institutional~~the ~~customer~~growth ~~recognized~~of inBVoIP ~~2016~~lines. ~~For~~However, ~~the~~revenues ~~three~~were ~~months~~adversely ~~ended~~impacted ~~June~~by ~~30,~~competitive ~~2017~~pricing pressure and ~~2016,~~declining ~~business data services~~ revenue ~~from~~associated ~~this~~with ~~customer~~one ~~amounted~~large toinstitutional $0customer.~~4 million and $3.4 million, respectively, including non-recurring fee revenue.~~ For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016, business data services revenue from this customer amounted to $01.92 million and $5.16 million, respectively~~. We~~, ~~anticipate~~including ~~less~~non-recurring ~~revenue~~fee ~~from this customer in 2017 as the recognition of~~ revenue on certain upfront billed amounts which ended with the fixed contract term on June 30, 2016. In addition, during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2016, we recognized the remaining balance of deferred up-front charges of $0.8 million when another institutional customer terminated the related services. ~~In general, exclusive of revenue from these non-recurring fees, revenue and the related demand for data services continues to rise as reflected in the growth of BVoIP lines.~~

Continued competition in the telecommunications industry has increasingly resulted in customers using technologies other than traditional phone lines for voice and data. Business customers are moving local voice services to VoIP technology. Generally, VoIP technology is less expensive than traditional wireline phone service, requiring us to respond with more competitive bundled unified services such as our BVoIP product.

The decrease in voice service revenues for the business channel for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 compared to the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2016 was caused primarily by the decline of voice access lines. Business voice access lines decreased 5.07% as of ~~June~~ September 30, 2017 compared to ~~June~~September 30, 2016. The decline in traditional voice access lines was partially offset by an increase in BVoIP lines of 1415.2% for the same period.

Hosted and managed services revenues for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 were comparable to the prior year periods.

Equipment and related services revenues decreased for the three and nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 when compared to the prior year ~~period~~periods because of large contract installations for certain commercial and institutional customers completed in 2016. Revenue from equipment sales varies from period to period based on the volume of large installation projects.

2527

Table of Contents

Consumer Channel

The Company continues to transform its consumer channel by replacing traditional voice services with next generation strategic services. The Company considers strategic service revenues in the consumer channel to include video and internet services. Consumer strategic revenues now represent 5253% of the total consumer channel revenues for the current quarter compared to 4849% in the prior year period.

Video services revenue increased for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 compared to the same ~~period~~periods in the prior year because of an increase in video subscribers of 1211.04%.

Internet revenues for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 decreased compared to the prior year as a result of the combined effect of competitive pricing and a decline in low-bandwidth internet subscribers.

The decrease in voice services revenue for the three months and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 compared to the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2016 was caused primarily by a decline in voice access lines. Consumer voice access lines decreased 11.41% from the year ago period which contributed an estimated $2.10 million and $46.32 million to the decline in consumer voice services revenue for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, respectively. Residential customers are increasingly using wireless services in place of traditional wireline phone services as well as using VoIP technology offered by cable competitors.

In an effort to slow the rate of internet and voice line loss, we are continuing retention and acquisition programs, and are increasingly focusing efforts on bundling of services. We have instituted various “saves” campaigns designed to focus on specific circumstances where we believe customer churn is controllable. These campaigns include targeted offers to “at risk” customers as well as other promotional tools designed to enhance customer retention. We also emphasize win back and employee referral programs. Additionally, we are intensifying our efforts relative to developing tools and training to enhance our customer service capability to improve customer retention and growth.

Wholesale and Other Channel

Wholesale carrier revenue decreased for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in the prior year as certain carriers have replaced older legacy circuits with more cost effective higher bandwidth solutions.

Other revenue decreased for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016 because of a decline in ancillary services. There has been a reduction in marketing effort on certain ancillary products, such as wireless, as we focus on other telecommunication services.

Table of Contents

Operating Costs and Expenses

The following tables summarize our costs and expenses for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 compared to the costs and expenses for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2016 (dollars in thousands):

Three Months Ended

June 30,

Change

September 30,

Change

2017

2016

Amount

Percentage

Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)

40,~~181~~100

4041,~~605~~903

(~~424~~1,803)

(14.03)

Selling, general and administrative expenses

2629,~~608~~827

29,~~554~~206

~~(2,946)~~621

~~(10~~2.0)1

Depreciation and amortization

2122,~~742~~174

2223,~~493~~036

(~~751~~862)

(3.37)

8892,~~531~~101

9294,~~652~~145

(42,~~121~~044)

(42.42)

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,				Change
	2017		2016		Amount		Percentage
Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)	$	81,372	$	83,084	$	(1,712)	(2.1)	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		58,003		59,419		(1,416)	(2.4)	%
Depreciation and amortization		43,012		44,443		(1,431)	(3.2)	%
	$	182,387	$	186,946	$	(4,559)	(2.4)	%

The Company’s total headcount as of June 30, 2017 was 1,218 compared to 1,303 as of June 30, 2016. Employee related costs are included in both cost of revenues and selling, general and administrative expenses.

Cost of revenues consists of costs we incur to provide our products and services including those for operating and maintaining our networks, installing and maintaining customer premise equipment, video content costs and cost of services directly associated with various products. Costs of revenue for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 when compared to the prior year periods decreased with reduced costs of plant maintenance of $1.0 million and $3.2 million, respectively. This was offset by increased content costs for Hawaiian Telcom TV of $1.0 million and $2.0 million for the three and six month periods, respectively, with increased subscribers.

Selling, general and administrative expenses include costs related to sales and marketing, information systems and other administrative functions. The decrease for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 relative to the three and six months ended June 30, 2016 is primarily due to lower wage costs of $2.0 million and $3.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively. For the six month period, this was offset by pension settlement losses associated with a higher level of retirements in the early part of 2017 amounting to $2.3 million.

Depreciation and amortization for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2017 was lower than the same periods in the prior year due to certain assets becoming fully depreciated in the latter part of 2016.

Table of Contents


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				Change
	2017		2016		Amount		Percentage
Cost of revenues (exclusive of depreciation and amortization)	$	121,472	$	124,987	$	(3,515)	(2.8)	%
Selling, general and administrative expenses		87,830		88,625		(795)	(0.9)	%
Depreciation and amortization		65,186		67,479		(2,293)	(3.4)	%
	$	274,488	$	281,091	$	(6,603)	(2.3)	%

The Company’s total headcount as of September 30, 2017 was 1,220 compared to 1,289 as of September 30, 2016. Employee related costs are included in both cost of revenues and selling, general and administrative expenses.

Cost of revenues consists of costs we incur to provide our products and services including those for operating and maintaining our networks, installing and maintaining customer premise equipment, video content costs and other cost of services directly associated with various products. Costs of revenue for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 when compared to the prior year periods decreased with reduced costs of labor of $0.7 million and $2.2 million, respectively, with an emphasis on labor efficiency. In addition, for the three and nine month periods in 2017 compared to the same periods in 2016, we incurred $0.3 million and $1.9 million less in third party labor costs.

Selling, general and administrative expenses include costs related to sales and marketing, information systems and other administrative functions. The change for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 relative to the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 is primarily due to lower wage costs of $1.2 million and $2.9 million, respectively, on lower headcount. In addition, employee retirement costs declined for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same period in prior year by $0.4 million and increased for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 by $0.8 million. Retirement costs were primarily impacted by the level of retirements in each period impacting the amount of losses recognized on pension lump sum settlements. Selling, general and administrative expenses were also impacted by professional fees related to the pending merger amounting to $2.0 million and $2.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, respectively.

Depreciation and amortization for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2017 was lower than the same periods in the prior year due to certain assets becoming fully depreciated in the latter part of 2016.

Other Income and (Expense)

The following tables summarize other income (expense) for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016 (dollars in thousands).

	Three Months Ended
	June 30,				Change
	September 30,				Change
	2017		2016		Amount		Percentage
Interest expense	$	(34,~~819~~150)	$	(4,~~484~~156)	$	~~665~~6	(140.81)	%
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		(4,826)		—		(4,826)	NA	%
	$	(4,150)	$	(4,156)	$	6	(0.1)	%
	$	(8,645)	$	(4,484)	$	(4,161)	92.8	%

	Six Months Ended
	Nine Months Ended
	June 30,				Change
	September 30,				Change
	2017		2016		Amount		Percentage
Interest expense	$	(711,~~812~~962)	$	(812,~~724~~879)	$	~~912~~917	(107.51)	%
Loss on early extinguishment of debt		(4,826)		—		(4,826)	NA	%
	$	(1216,~~638~~788)	$	(812,~~724~~879)	$	(3,~~914~~909)	4430.94	%

Interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017 decreased compared to the same periods in 2016 due to lower interest rates associated with our new financing. Interest capitalized amounted to $0.6 million and $0.4 million for three months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Interest capitalized amounted to $1.1 million and $0.7 million for six months ended June 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The growth in capitalized interest is due to the financing costs attributed to the trans-Pacific cable that is currently under construction.29

Table of Contents

Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 decreased compared to the same period in 2016 due to lower interest rates associated with our new financing. Interest capitalized amounted to $0.5 million and $0.4 million for three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Interest capitalized amounted to $1.6 million and $1.1 million for nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The growth in capitalized interest is due to the financing costs attributed to the trans-Pacific cable that was under construction until completion in August 2017.

In February 2017, we entered into a delayed draw credit agreement for new term loans and a new revolving credit facility. The new facility fully funded the repayment of the existing term loan and replacement of the existing revolving credit facility on May 4, 2017. We recognized the repayment of the existing debt instruments as a debt extinguishment incurring a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $4.8 million.

Income Tax Provision

For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, we recognized an income tax ~~benefit on a loss before the income tax benefit. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2016, we recognized an income tax~~ provision ~~on income before the income tax provision. We had effective tax rates~~ of 40$87.9%5 ~~and~~million ~~39.9% for the three months ended June 30, 2017~~ and ~~2016, respectively~~$83. We7 ~~had effective tax rates of 41.1% and 40.0% for the six months ended June 30~~million, ~~2017 and 2016,~~ respectively. The ~~effective~~large tax ~~rates~~provision ~~increased~~was ~~from~~primarily ~~the~~attributed ~~prior year as an income tax credit decreased in magnitude relative~~ to the ~~pretax~~full ~~income~~valuation orallowance ~~loss. We~~established ~~consider~~for adeferred ~~variety~~income oftax ~~factors~~assets in ~~determining~~ the ~~effective~~current ~~tax rate, including our forecasted full-~~year ~~pretax results, the U~~periods.~~S. federal statutory rate, expected nondeductible expenses and estimated state taxes.~~

We assess the ability to realize our deferred tax assets and assess the need for a valuation allowance on an ongoing basis. We are required to consider all available positive and negative evidence in evaluating the likelihood that we will be able to realize the benefit of our deferred tax assets in the future. Such evidence includes scheduled reversals of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, tax planning strategies and the results of recent operations.

In considering the impact of recent operations on our deferred tax asset assessment, we utilize a rolling three years of actual and current year anticipated results as the primary measure of cumulative income or losses. These are adjusted for permanent differences between financial reporting and taxable income. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017, we incurred a pretax loss from operations. In addition, as of September 30, 2017, we had a cumulative loss from operations for the three year period. Because of the three year cumulative losses, we are required to look only to sources of income that are deemed objective and verifiable based on historical experience. We considered that the cumulative loss was caused, in part, by costs not expected to recur in future periods such as merger costs. However, the loss was also caused by costs, such as pension settlement losses, that are not deemed part of core operations but the frequency of which is hard to predict. For example, in the third quarter of 2017, the level of retirements and related pension settlements ramped up making it more challenging to conclude such expenses will not recur in future periods. With the challenge of predicting future taxable income based on actual historical results, we had to limit the amount of taxable income included in our assessment of deferred income tax asset recoverability.

Based on the more likely than not criteria for realization of deferred income tax assets, we established a full valuation allowance for our deferred income tax assets as of September 30, 2017. If, in future periods, new positive evidence becomes available, the conclusion regarding the need for a full valuation allowance may change resulting in the reversal of some or all of the valuation allowance.

For the current year periods, the income tax provision differs from amounts determined by applying the statutory federal income tax rate of 34% to the loss before income taxes primarily because of changes in the valuation allowance established for the recovery of deferred income tax assets. Excluding the effects of the valuation allowance, we consider a variety of factors in determining the effective tax rate, including our forecasted full-year pretax results, the U.S. federal statutory rate, expected nondeductible expenses and estimated state taxes.

As of December 31, 2016, net operating losses available for carry forward through 2036 amounted to $166.5 million for federal tax purposes and $172.5 million for state tax purposes. Availability of net operating losses in future periods may be subject to additional limitations if there is a deemed change in control for income tax reporting purposes. Such change in control is determined for income tax reporting purposes based on cumulative changes in stock ownership over a defined period.

~~Liquidity and Capital Resources~~30

As of June 30, 2017, we had cash and cash equivalents of $25.9 million. From an ongoing operating perspective, our cash requirements in 2017 consist of supporting the development and introduction of new products, capital expenditure projects, pension funding obligations and other changes in working capital. A combination of cash-on-hand, cash generated from operating activities and available financing will be used to fund our cash requirements.

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of September 30, 2017, we had cash and cash equivalents of $44.7 million. From an ongoing operating perspective, our cash requirements in 2017 consist of supporting the development and introduction of new products, capital expenditure projects, pension funding obligations and other changes in working capital. A combination of cash-on-hand, cash generated from operating activities and available financing will be used to fund our cash requirements.

We continue to focus on improving operating results, including efforts to simplify product offerings, improve our customer service experience and increase our revenue enhancement activities. There can be no assurance that these actions will result in improved overall cash flow. We continue to have sizable retirement obligations for our existing employee base. Any sustained declines in the value of pension trust assets or relatively high levels of pension lump sum benefit payments, will increase the magnitude of future plan contributions.

Agreements with the Hawaii Public Utilities Commission and the debt agreements of Hawaiian Telcom Communications, Inc. limit the ability of our subsidiaries to pay dividends to the parent company and restrict the net assets of all of our subsidiaries. This can limit our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders. As the parent company has no operations, debt or other obligations, this restriction has no other immediate impact on our operations.

Cash Flows for ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016

Our primary source of funds continues to be cash generated from operations. We use the net cash generated from operations to fund network expansion and modernization. We expect that our capital spending requirements will continue to be financed through internally generated funds. We also expect to use cash generated in future periods for debt service. Additional debt or equity financing may be needed to fund additional development activities or to maintain our capital structure to ensure financial flexibility.

Net cash provided by operations amounted to $4080.68 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017. Net cash provided by operations amounted to $5172.39 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2016. The ~~decrease~~increase in cash provided by operations was because of ~~working~~up-front ~~capital~~payments ~~demands~~received ~~during~~for ~~the~~fiber ~~six~~circuit ~~months~~capacity ~~ended~~on ~~June~~our ~~30,~~trans-Pacific cable that was completed in August 2017.

Cash used in investing activities for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 was comprised of capital expenditures of $5275.67 million. Cash used in investing activities included capital expenditures of $5278.93 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2016. The level of capital expenditures for 2017 is expected to be less than in 2016 as we scale back capital on certain elements of our network expansion initiatives focusing on those directly related to sales opportunities.

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, we received the proceeds of our new term loan borrowing of $320.0 million. Prior to funding the term loan, we had made borrowings on our existing line of credit of $10.0 million in 2017. The drawing was used, in part, to fund capital costs of our trans-Pacific submarine cable ~~under construction~~. The new term loan funded the repayment of the existing term debt and the outstanding balance on our existing line of credit. Total repayments of debt amounted to $~~300~~302.17 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017. In addition, during the same period we paid for costs of the new financing amounting to $6.3 million. The balance of cash flows from financing activities for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and 2016 was related primarily to proceeds from and satisfaction of other obligations.

Outstanding Debt and Financing Arrangements

In February 2017, we entered into a delayed draw credit agreement for new term loans and a new revolving credit facility. The new facility funded repayment of the existing term loan and replacement of the existing revolving credit facility on May 4, 2017. Included in the new facility is a term loan for $90.0 million with a maturity in 2022 and another term loan for $230.0 million with a maturity in 2023. The agreement also provides for a new line of credit for $30.0 million with a maturity in 2022. The new financing provided significant additional cash resources.

With our new debt structure, we do not expect to generate the necessary cash flows from operations to repay the facility in its entirety by the maturity dates of 2022 and 2023. Repayment is dependent on our ability to refinance the credit facility at reasonable terms. The ability to refinance the indebtedness at reasonable terms before maturity cannot be assured.31

Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017, the Company’s future contractual obligations have not changed materially from the amounts disclosed as of December 31, 2016 in our Form 10-K. However, we did fund our new term debt facility on May 4, 2017 and repaid existing debt which resulted in revised obligations for term debt and debt interest as of ~~June~~September 30, 2017, at current rates, as follows (dollars in thousands):

			2018 and		2020 and		2022 and
	2017		2019		2021		Thereafter		Total
Term loan facility	$	52,~~125~~563	$	23,375	$	32,000	$	259,500	$	~~320~~317,~~000~~438
Debt interest		84,~~519~~271		32,~~429~~646		29,~~483~~680		14,~~268~~364		8480,~~699~~961
Total	$	136,~~644~~834	$	5556,~~804~~021	$	61,~~483~~680	$	273,~~768~~864	$	~~404~~398,~~699~~399

We do not maintain any off balance sheet financing or other arrangements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements. Changes in these estimates and assumptions are considered reasonably possible and may have a material effect on the condensed consolidated financial statements and thus actual results could differ from the amounts reported and disclosed herein. The Company’s critical accounting policies that require the use of estimates and assumptions were discussed in detail in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, and have not changed materially from that discussion. The possible impact of recently adopted and recently issued accounting pronouncements is discussed in Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements included in Part I, Financial Information.

3032

Table of Contents

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2017, our floating rate obligations consisted of $~~320~~317.04 million of debt outstanding under our term loan facility. Accordingly, our earnings and cash flow are affected by changes in interest rates. Based on our borrowings at ~~June~~September 30, 2017 and assuming a 1.0 percentage point increase or decrease in the average interest rate under these borrowings, we estimate that our annual interest expense would increase or decrease by approximately $3.2 million.

3133

Table of Contents

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company's management, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Certifications

The certifications attached hereto as Exhibits 31.1, 31.2, 32.1 and 32.2 should be read in conjunction with the disclosures set forth herein.

3234

Table of Contents

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

~~Other~~On ~~than~~October ~~ordinary~~13, ~~routine~~2017, ~~litigation~~plaintiff ~~incidental~~Anthony Franchi filed a putative class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii, against the Company, the individual members of the Company’s board of directors, Cincinnati Bell Inc. (“Cincinnati Bell”) and Twin Acquisition Corp. a wholly-owned subsidiary of Cincinnati Bell, as defendants (the “Complaint”). The Complaint alleges violations of federal securities laws due to alleged omissions of certain material information in the ~~business~~Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed by Cincinnati Bell with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on August 17, we2017 ~~are~~(the ~~not~~“Registration ~~involved~~Statement”), in ~~any~~connection ~~material~~with ~~pending~~the ~~legal~~proposed ~~proceedings~~merger ~~that~~between the Company and Twin Acquisition Corp. (the “Proposed Merger”). Plaintiffs are ~~likely~~seeking to ~~have~~enjoin the Proposed Merger, or if the Proposed Merger is consummated, an order rescinding the Proposed Merger, dissemination of a ~~material~~Registration ~~adverse~~Statement ~~effect~~that includes the information alleged to have been omitted, certain declaratory relief and an award of attorneys’ fees. Although the Company believes the Complaint lacks merit and no further disclosure was required to supplement the Registration Statement or related proxy statement/prospectus under applicable laws, to avoid the risk that the Complaint may delay or otherwise adversely affect consummation of the Proposed Merger and to minimize the expense of defending such action, the Company voluntarily supplemented the disclosures contained in the Definitive Proxy Statement on usSchedule 14A filed with the SEC on October 5, 2017, all of which are set forth in the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company with the SEC on October 31, 2017.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

See Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of our 2016 Annual Report for a detailed discussion of risk factors related to our business, results of operations and financial condition along with the following new risk factor.

Our business may be adversely affected by the announcement and pendency of our merger agreement towith ~~be acquired by~~ Cincinnati Bell.

The announcement and pendency of the Merger may adversely affect our business due to customers' uncertainty and employee and other disruptions as well as intensified competition from our competitors as they attempt to take advantage of the uncertainties. In addition, we have incurred legal and other expenses in connection with the pending Merger. All of these factors may have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Under the terms of the Merger Agreement, we have agreed to operate our business in the ordinary course consistent with past practice, as well as to refrain from taking certain actions in the conduct of our business without Cincinnati Bell's prior written consent until the consummation of the Merger. Actions that may require Cincinnati Bell's consent include, but are not limited to, new indebtedness, capital expenditures, loans and investments, acquisitions, and issuances of securities. These restrictions could adversely affect our business and have an adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

There is no assurance that the Merger with Cincinnati Bell will occur. Completion of the Merger is subject to various customary closing conditions, including, but not limited to, (i) approval of the Merger Agreement by our shareholders, (ii) the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended, (iii) consents having been obtained from the Federal Communications Commission and the Hawaii Public Utilities Commission, (iv) the absence of any order or injunction prohibiting the consummation of the Merger, (v) the accuracy of the representations and warranties of each party, (v) performance, in all material respects, all obligations and compliance with, in all material respects, agreements and covenants to be performed or complied with by each party and (vi) declaration of effectiveness of the Registration Statement on Form S-4 to be filed by Cincinnati Bell. Additional risks and uncertainties which could affect the parties' ability to complete the Merger include, without limitation, the possibility of litigation (including related to the transaction itself) and successful completion of anticipated financing arrangements. If the Merger is not completed, the share price of our common stock will change to the extent that the current market price of the Company's common stock reflects an assumption that the Merger will be completed. In addition, under circumstances defined in the Merger Agreement, we might be required to pay a termination fee of $11.9 million. Finally, any disruptions to our business resulting from the announcement and pendency of the Merger will likely continue in the event that the Merger is not completed.

3335

Table of Contents

In addition, under circumstances defined in the Merger Agreement, we might be required to pay a termination fee of $11.9 million. Finally, any disruptions to our business resulting from the announcement and pendency of the Merger will likely continue in the event that the Merger is not completed.

Table of Contents

Item 5. Other Information.

Earnings Release

Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc. issued a press release on ~~August~~November 8, 2017 announcing its 2017 ~~second~~ third quarter earnings. This information, attached as Exhibit 99.1, is being furnished to the SEC pursuant to Item 2.02 of Form 8-K.

3437

Table of Contents

Item 6. Exhibits

See ~~Exhibit Index~~ following ~~the~~Exhibit ~~signature page of this Report~~Index.

35EXHIBIT INDEX



2.1	Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 9, 2017, by and among Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc., Cincinnati Bell Inc. and Twin Acquisition Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Registrant’s Form 8-K, File No. 01-34686, filed with the SEC on July 10, 2017).
3.1	Amendment to Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant’s Form 8-K, File No. 01-34686, filed with the SEC on July 10, 2017).
10.1	Amendment No. 1 to Nomination, Standstill and Support Agreement, dated as of July 9, 2017, by and among Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc., Twin Haven Special Opportunities Fund III, L.P., Twin Haven Special Opportunities Partners III, L.L.C., Twin Haven Special Opportunities Fund IV, L.P., Twin Haven Special Opportunities Partners IV, L.L.C. and Twin Haven Capital Partners, L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Form 8-K, File No. 01-34686, filed with the SEC on July 10, 2017).
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
99.1	Press Release dated November 8, 2017 announcing third quarter earnings.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	HAWAIIAN TELCOM HOLDCO, INC.
August 8, 2017	/s/ Scott K. Barber
November 8, 2017	/s/ Scott K. Barber
	Scott K. Barber
	Chief Executive Officer
August 8, 2017	/s/ Dan T. Bessey
November 8, 2017	/s/ Dan T. Bessey
	Dan T. Bessey
	Chief Financial Officer

3639

Table of Contents

EXHIBIT INDEX

2.1	Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of July 9, 2017, by and among Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc., Cincinnati Bell Inc. and Twin Acquisition Corp. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Registrant’s Form 8-K, File No. 01-34686, filed with the SEC on July 10, 2017).
3.1	Amendment to Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant’s Form 8-K, File No. 01-34686, filed with the SEC on July 10, 2017).
10.1	Amendment No. 1 to Nomination, Standstill and Support Agreement, dated as of July 9, 2017, by and among Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc., Twin Haven Special Opportunities Fund III, L.P., Twin Haven Special Opportunities Partners III, L.L.C., Twin Haven Special Opportunities Fund IV, L.P., Twin Haven Special Opportunities Partners IV, L.L.C. and Twin Haven Capital Partners, L.L.C. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Registrant’s Form 8-K, File No. 01-34686, filed with the SEC on July 10, 2017).
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
99.1	Press Release dated August 8, 2017 announcing second quarter earnings.
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

Filing Compare · Hawaiian Telcom Holdco, Inc.