UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þX QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarter ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014

o_ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 000-54532

BREF HR, LLC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware		27-4938906
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. employer
incorporation or organization)		identification no.)

Three World Financial Center
250 Vesey Street, 11^th Floor New York, NY		10281
(Address of principal executive office)		(Zip Code)

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code): (212) 417-7265

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes o __ No þ X

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o __ No þ X

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o__ Accelerated filer o__ Non-accelerated filer þX Smaller reporting company o__ (Do not check if a smallerreporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o __ No þ X

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION 2 Item 1. Financial Statements 2 ~~BREF HR, LLC~~ Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited) 2 ~~BREF HR, LLC and Hard Rock Hotel Holdings, LLC~~ Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations ~~and Comprehensive Income~~ (~~Loss) (~~unaudited) 3 ~~BREF HR, LLC and Hard Rock Hotel Holdings, LLC~~ Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited) 4 Notes To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited) 65 Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 2314 Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk 3220 Item 4. Controls and Procedures 3220 PART II—OTHER INFORMATION 3320 Item 1. Legal Proceedings 3320 Item 1A. Risk Factors 3320 Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds 3320 Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities 3321 Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders 3421 Item 5. Other Information 3421 Item 6. Exhibits 3421

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

BREF HR, LLC
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets
(Unaudited)

($ in thousands)	~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014			December 31, ~~2011~~2013
Assets
Current assets:
Current assets
Cash and Cash equivalents	$	15,153		$	16,818
Cash and cash equivalents	$	18,976		$	14,094
Accounts receivable, net	1011,~~052~~980			8,~~054~~351
Inventories	23,~~309~~856			2,~~569~~947
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	4,~~345~~167			3,~~311~~002
Investment in joint venture	1,780			—
Related party receivable	60			435
Related party receivable	634			759
Restricted cash	4,533			5,069
Restricted cash	3,092			4,632
Total current assets	43,572			33,898
Total current assets	37,365			36,143
Property and equipment, net	468,462			479,008
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation and amortization	503,044			511,351
Intangible assets, net	68,503			70,542
Intangible assets, net	95,892			104,000
Restricted cash	20,097			19,354
Restricted cash	20,176			28,958
Investment in joint venture	1,444			1,425
Total assets	$	~~656~~602,~~477~~078		$	~~680~~604,~~452~~227
Liabilities and Members' Equity (Deficit)
Current liabilities:
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	5,~~079~~616		$	37,~~430~~560
Construction related payables	~~303~~306			~~235~~847
Related party payables	691,231			—220
Interest payable	2,000			—
Accrued expenses	21,560			20,816
Accrued expenses	24,896			26,939
Interest payable	76,514			61,165
Total current liabilities	32,347			30,604
Current portion of long term debt	710,954			686,850
Long term accrued expenses	684			1,170
Total current liabilities	816,181			777,458
Long term interest payable	37,774			19,590
Long term accrued expenses	—			177
Long term debt	618,413			594,897
Long term interest payable	13,324			10,547
Long term debt - due to affiliate	1417,~~684~~543			1316,~~802~~596
Total long term liabilities	~~671~~30,~~555~~867			~~629~~27,~~459~~320
Total liabilities	~~703~~847,~~902~~048			~~660~~804,~~063~~778
Members' equity (deficit):
Members' equity (deficit)
Paid-in capital	86,673			86,673
Accumulated other comprehensive loss	—			(203		)
Accumulated deficit	(331,643		)	(287,224		)
Accumulated deficit	(134,098		)	(66,081		)
Total members' equity (deficit)	(244,970		)	(200,551		)
Total members' equity (deficit)	(47,425		)	20,389
Total liabilities and members equity (deficit)	$	602,078		$	604,227
Total liabilities and members equity (deficit)	$	656,477		$	680,452

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

BREF HR, LLC Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations ~~and Comprehensive (Loss) Income~~

(Unaudited)

	Company												HRH Holdings, LLC
($ in thousands)	Three months ended June 30, 2014			Three months ended June 30, 2013			Six months ended June 30, 2014			Six months ended June 30, 2013
				AS RESTATED - SEE NOTE 13						AS RESTATED - SEE NOTE 13
Revenues
($ in thousands)	Three months ended September 30, 2012			Three months ended September 30, 2011			Nine months ended September 30, 2012			Period from Mar 1, 2011 to September 30, 2011			Period from Jan 1, 2011 to Feb 28, 2011
Casino	$	12,194		$	9,989		$	26,132		$	23,183
Revenue:
Lodging	17,741			17,254			34,959			32,325
Casino	$	11,342		$	10,822		$	33,464		$	25,617		$	5,973
Food and beverage	24,703			24,808			41,227			41,295
Lodging	15,469			15,155			48,405			36,195			9,222
Entertainment, retail and other	7,619			10,318			13,523			18,551
Food and beverage	20,781			21,876			64,310			55,126			12,390
Gross revenues	62,257			62,369			115,841			115,354
Retail	732			815			2,154			1,858			426
Less: Promotional allowances	(4,976		)	(5,159		)	(9,447		)	(10,684		)
Other	6,025			6,656			22,252			16,299			4,591
Net revenues	57,281			57,210			106,394			104,670
Gross revenues	54,349			55,324			170,585			135,095			32,602
Costs and Expenses
Less: Promotional allowances	(4,625		)	(4,622		)	(15,311		)	(10,695		)	(3,345		)
Casino	9,052			8,678			16,739			18,412
Net revenues	49,724			50,702			155,274			124,400			29,257
Lodging	5,536			5,044			11,156			9,773
Costs and Expenses:
Food and beverage	14,131			13,669			24,473			22,619
Casino	9,004			9,357			27,291			21,350			5,666
Entertainment, retail and other	4,888			6,883			8,939			11,985
Lodging	5,275			4,987			15,839			11,757			3,122
Marketing	2,242			2,414			4,650			4,445
Food and beverage	11,973			12,066			35,270			28,658			5,748
Management fee and expense reimbursements - related party	1,417			463			2,606			914
Retail	405			539			1,355			1,197			273
General and administrative	8,608			11,054			17,349			20,748
Other	3,581			3,802			13,286			9,631			2,877
Depreciation and amortization	7,456			7,972			14,919			16,041
Marketing	2,041			1,421			6,816			3,376			843
Pre-opening	—			2			—			10
Fee and expense reimbursements - related party	450			442			1,719			1,598			932
Total costs and expenses	53,330			56,179			100,831			104,947
General and administrative	10,144			9,797			28,068			22,318			6,389
Income (loss) from operations	3,951			1,031			5,563			(277		)
Depreciation and amortization	7,595			7,398			23,612			17,325			10,858
Interest income	3			10			6			16
Pre-opening	89			146			259			146			—
Interest expense	(24,722		)	(24,127		)	(50,007		)	(47,279		)
Impairment of intangible assets	—			—			3,000			—			—
Income on joint venture investment	12			57			19			36
Total costs and expenses	50,557			49,955			156,515			117,356			36,708
Loss before income tax expense	(20,756		)	(23,029		)	(44,419		)	(47,504		)
(Loss) income from operations	(833		)	747			(1,241		)	7,044			(7,451		)
Income tax expense	—			—			—			—
Interest income	4			24			31			47			8
Net loss	$	(20,756	)	$	(23,029	)	$	(44,419	)	$	(47,504	)
Interest expense	(22,506		)	(20,523		)	(66,483		)	(46,743		)	(14,870		)
Loss on joint venture investment	(324		)	—			(324		)	—			—
Gain on forgiveness of debt	—			—			—			—			32,460
(Loss) income before income tax (benefit) expense	(23,659		)	(19,752		)	(68,017		)	(39,652		)	10,147
Income tax (benefit) expense	—			—			—			—			141
Net (Loss) income	$	(23,659	)	$	(19,752	)	$	(68,017	)	$	(39,652	)	$	10,006
Other Comprehensive (loss) income:
Interest rate cap fair market value adjustment, net of tax	—			139			203			(194		)	335
Comprehensive (loss) income	$	(23,659	)	$	(19,613	)	$	(67,814	)	$	(39,846	)	$	10,341

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

BREF HR, LLC
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)

BREF HR, LLC Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)



	Six months ended June 30, 2014			Six months ended June 30, 2013
($ in thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(44,419	)	$	(47,504	)
Adjustment to reconcile net loss to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation	12,880			12,553
Provision for doubtful accounts	215			196
Amortization of intangible assets	2,039			3,488
Amortization of debt discount	16,305			15,638
Accrued non-cash interest applied to principal	8,746			6,626
Change in value of interest rate caps net of
premium amortization	—			64
Income on joint venture investment	(19		)	(36		)
(Increase) decrease in assets:
Accounts receivable	(3,844		)	(2,960		)
Inventories	(909		)	(619		)
Prepaid expenses	(1,165		)	(232		)
Related party receivable	375			694
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Accounts payable	(1,944		)	2,123
Related party payable	1,011			(406		)
Other accrued liabilities	824			1,574
Accrued interest payable	18,126			14,706
Net cash provided by operating activities	8,221			5,905
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment	(2,334		)	(1,772		)
Payments on construction related payables	(541		)	5
Restricted cash contributions	(4,101		)	(4,531		)
Restricted cash withdrawals	3,894			4,491
Loan to joint venture	—			(248		)
Repayments of joint venture debt	—			150
Net cash used in investing activities	(3,082		)	(1,905		)
Cash flows from financing activities
Purchase of interest rate caps	—			(64		)
Capital lease payments	(257		)	(367		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(257		)	(431		)
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents	4,882			3,569
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	14,094			13,658
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	18,976		$	17,227

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Cash paid during the period for interest, net
of amounts capitalized	$	6,750		10,201

Supplemental Disclosure Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities
Construction related payables	$	306		$	307

	Company						HRH Holdings, LLC
				AS RESTATED - SEE NOTE 13
	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012			Period from Mar 1, 2011 to September 30, 2011			Period from Jan 1, 2011 to Feb 28, 2011
($ in thousands)
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income (loss)	$	(68,017	)	$	(39,652	)	$	10,006
Adjustment to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash
provided by operating activities:
Depreciation	18,504			11,885			10,307
Gain on forgiveness of debt	—			—			(32,460		)
Provision for (recovery of) doubtful accounts	(301		)	988			5
Amortization of loan fees and costs	—			—			2,200
Impairment of intangible assets	3,000			—			—
Amortization of intangible assets	5,108			5,441			551
Amortization of debt discount	21,079			12,100
Accrued non-cash interest applied to principal	4,319			3,297
Change in value of interest rate caps net of
premium amortization	340			33			335
Loss on joint venture investment	324			—			—
Loss on sale of assets	6			56			—
Deferred income taxes	—			—			141
(Increase) decrease in assets:
Accounts receivable	(1,697		)	(761		)	(1,065		)
Inventories	260			(341		)	508
Prepaid expenses	(1,029		)	(2,288		)	33
Related party receivable	125			(211		)	4
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Accounts payable	1,649			(3,320		)	66
Related party payable	69			—			945
Other accrued liabilities	(1,083		)	(380		)	6,916
Accrued interest payable	20,184			10,406			5,529
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	2,840			(2,747		)	4,021
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment	(10,170		)	(3,254		)	(137		)
Payments on construction related payables	—			(190		)	(44		)
Reduction (increase) in restricted cash	—			—			16,527
Restricted cash contributions	(6,744		)	(38,958		)	—
Restricted cash withdrawals	17,066			10,724			—
Purchase of joint venture investment	(2,104		)	—			—
Proceeds from sale of operating assets	35			10			—
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities	(1,917		)	(31,668		)	16,346
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from borrowings	—			13,000			—
Proceeds from members' equity contribution	—			18,627			—
Repayments on borrowings	(1,000		)	(1,093		)	(15,199		)

Continued on next page

	Company						HRH Holdings, LLC
				AS RESTATED - SEE NOTE 13
	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012			Period from Mar 1, 2011 to September 30, 2011			Period from Jan 1, 2011 to Feb 28, 2011
($ in thousands)
Purchase of interest rate caps	(142		)	(372		)	—
Principal payments on capital leases	(1,446		)	(2,395		)	—
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities	(2,588		)	27,767			(15,199		)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents	(1,665		)	(6,648		)	5,168
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	16,818			20,191			15,023
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	15,153		$	13,543		$	20,191
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Cash paid during the period for interest, net
of amounts capitalized	$	2,133		18,532			$	8,245
Supplemental Disclosure Non-cash Investing
and Financing Activities
Construction related payables	$	303		$	392		$	2,450
Long-term debt in exchange for land	—			—			(52,158		)
Land provided in exchange for forgiveness of debt	—			—			22,000
Deferred financing cost	—			—			276
Forgiveness of accrued interest in exchange for land	—			—			(2,578		)
Gain on forgiveness of debt in exchange for land	—			—			(32,460		)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements.

BREF HR, LLC
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)

1. Company Structure

Organization

BREF HR, LLC is a Delaware limited liability company that was formed on February 11, 2011. The affairs of the Company are governed by a Limited Liability Company Agreement dated as of March 1, 2011 (the “LLC Agreement”). Unless otherwise specified, the terms the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” refer to BREF HR, LLC and its consolidated subsidiaries, or any one or more of them, as the context may require. We own and operate the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas. Commencing operations in 1995, the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas is modeled after the highly successful Hard Rock Cafe restaurant chain and is decorated with an extensive collection of rare rock and roll memorabilia. The original Hard Rock Cafe was co-founded in 1971 by Peter Morton, and the “Hard Rock” name has grown to become widely recognized throughout the world.

The Company was formed by certain affiliates of Brookfield Financial, LLC (“Brookfield Financial”) to acquire the limited liability company interests of HRHH JV Junior Mezz, LLC (“HRHH JV Junior Mezz”) and HRHH Gaming Junior Mezz, LLC (“HRHH Gaming Junior Mezz”), which indirectly owned the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas and certain related assets. These assets were acquired pursuant to the assignment from Hard Rock Hotel Holdings, LLC (“HRH Holdings”) in connection with the default by HRH Holdings and its subsidiaries on the real estate financing facility (the “Facility”), and the resulting settlement agreement, as described below. Brookfield Financial is managed by Brookfield Real Estate Financial Partners LLC (together with its affiliates, “Brookfield”).

On March 1, 2011, HRH Holdings, Vegas HR Private Limited (the “Mortgage Lender”), Brookfield Financial, NRFC WA Holdings, LLC, Morgans Hotel Group Co. (“Morgans” and together with an affiliated entity, the “Morgans Parties”) and certain affiliates of DLJ Merchant Banking Partners (“DLJMBP”), as well as other interested parties entered into the Agreement to Transfer in Lieu of Foreclosure and Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) pursuant to which the membership interests of HRHH JV Junior Mezz and HRHH Gaming Junior Mezz were transferred and assigned to the Company. The transactions contemplated by the Settlement Agreement are referred to as the “Assignment.” The Assignment was accounted for as a business combination.

The Assignment provided for, among other things:

• the transfer by HRH Holdings to an affiliate of Brookfield Financial of 100% of the indirect equity interests in the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas and other related assets, namely HHRH JV Junior Mezz and HRHH Gaming Junior Mezz;

• release of the non-recourse carve-out guaranties provided by HRH Holdings with respect to the loans made by the Mortgage Lender, Brookfield Financial and NRFC WA Holdings, LLC to the direct and indirect owners of the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas; and

• termination of the Morgans management agreement, dated as of February 2, 2007 and May 30, 2008, (the “Morgans Management Agreement”) with Morgans Hotel Group Management LLC (“Morgans Management”), pursuant to which Morgans Management was engaged by HRH Holdings as (i) the exclusive operator and manager of the Hard Rock and (ii) the asset manager of the approximately 23-acre parcel adjacent to the Hard Rock and the land on which the Hard Rock Cafe restaurant is situated (which is subject to a lease between our subsidiary, HRHH Cafe, LLC, as landlord, and Hard Rock Cafe International (USA), Inc., as tenant).

In connection with agreements entered into in relation to the Assignment, the Company and specified affiliates are contingently liable to distribute certain excess cash flows to specified former lenders and owners of HRH Holdings. These amounts are payable pursuant to the terms of these agreements only in the event that the existing lenders under the Amended Facility and the Second Mortgage agreements (as defined elsewhere) are paid specified values in full. See Note 10, Debt, for a description of the Amended Facility and Second Mortgage agreements. After considering the forecasted future performance of the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas and the cash distribution structure specified in the Amended Facility and the Second Mortgage, the Company has determined that the probability that any amounts will be distributed is remote and therefore no value has been attributed to these commitments.

The following footnotes cover periods both prior and subsequent to the Assignment. HRH Holdings’ historical condensed consolidated financial statements included herein for the two month period from January 1, 2011 to February 28, 2011 represent the results of operations and cash flows of HRH Holdings prior to the closing of the Assignment. Our historical condensed consolidated financial statements included herein for the periods following the closing of the Assignment represent our financial condition, results of operation and liquidity after the Assignment. As a result of various factors, the financial condition, results of operations and liquidity for the periods beginning on or after March 1, 2011 may not be comparable to the information prior to that date.

The Company's Going Concern

The Company incurred a loss of $6844.04 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014, and has a net members' deficit of $47245.40 million as of ~~September~~ June 30, ~~2012~~2014. The Amended Facility (as defined in Note 10, Debt) allows the Company to accrue 'payable in kind' interest ('"PIK interest'"), representing the difference between interest accruing under the Amended Facility and the amounts paid. The outstanding PIK interest ~~becomes~~as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $48.6 million and $39.8 million, respectively. The PIK interest outstanding as of March 1, 2014, in the amount of $44.3 million, became due and payable on March 1, 2014, ~~dependent~~as ~~upon whether~~ the operating performance of the Company ~~has~~did ~~met~~not meet a ~~defined~~specified ~~threshold ('~~debt yield threshold') for the twelve month period ~~ending~~ended March 1, 2014.~~The~~ ~~outstanding~~However, ~~PIK~~the ~~interest~~lender entered into a Forbearance Agreement effective as of ~~September 30~~March 1, ~~2012~~2014, ~~and~~pursuant ~~December 31,~~to ~~2011~~which ~~was~~it ~~$11.5~~agreed ~~million~~not ~~and~~to ~~$8.2~~exercise ~~million~~any rights or remedies with respect to the PIK interest until June 2, ~~respectively~~2014. The ~~outstanding~~lender ~~PIK~~entered ~~interest~~into a Second Amendment to the Forbearance Agreement effective as of ~~December~~June 312, ~~2012~~2014, ~~was~~pursuant ~~$18.5~~to ~~million~~which ~~and,~~it ~~subsequent~~agreed not to ~~December~~exercise ~~31,~~any ~~2012,~~rights ~~the~~or ~~outstanding~~remedies with respect to the PIK interest ~~has~~until ~~increased~~July 28, 2014. The lender entered into a Third Amendment to ~~approximately~~the ~~$31.7~~Forbearance ~~million~~Agreement effective as of ~~September~~July 3028, ~~2013.~~2014, ~~The~~pursuant ~~Company~~to ~~does~~which ~~not~~it ~~currently~~agreed ~~believe~~not ~~that~~to ~~the~~exercise ~~operating~~any ~~performance~~rights ~~will~~or ~~meet~~remedies ~~the~~with ~~debt~~respect ~~yield~~to ~~threshold~~the asPIK ~~defined~~interest inuntil ~~the~~August ~~Amended~~11, ~~Facility~~2014. ~~Accordingly,~~The ~~the~~lender ~~accrued~~entered ~~PIK~~into ~~interest~~a ~~payment~~Fourth isAmendment ~~expected~~ to bethe ~~due~~Forbearance ~~and~~Agreement ~~payable~~effective onas ~~March~~of 1August 11, 2014., Wepursuant ~~currently~~to dowhich it agreed not ~~believe~~to ~~the~~exercise ~~Company~~any ~~will~~rights ~~have~~or ~~sufficient~~remedies ~~funds~~with respect to ~~satisfy~~ the ~~expected~~ PIK interest ~~payment~~until onAugust ~~March 1~~25, 2014. ~~These~~Currently, ~~uncertainties~~the ~~raise~~Company ~~substantial~~does not ~~doubt~~have ~~about~~sufficient ~~the~~funds ~~Company’s~~to ~~ability~~satisfy toa ~~continue~~demand asfor athe ~~going~~PIK ~~concern~~interest payment on August 25, 2014. The Company is currently assessing its options, ~~including~~to ~~negotiating~~satisfy athe ~~waiver~~PIK ofinterest ~~this~~payment ~~requirement~~obligation, ~~from the lender~~including, ~~seeking~~but ~~approval~~not ~~from~~limited ~~the lender~~ to, ~~use~~negotiating ~~cash reserves to satisfy~~ a ~~portion~~waiver of this ~~potential~~requirement ~~obligation~~from the lender, selling off a portion of existing collateral or attempting to obtain ~~additional~~ borrowings from other sources. The Company's ability to continue as a going concern ~~depends~~is dependent upon its ability to restructure its indebtedness, obtain alternative financing on acceptable terms, obtain approval from the lender to use available cash reserves to satisfy a portion of this potential obligation, or a combination thereof. However, there ~~can~~is be no ~~assurance~~certainty ~~these~~on ~~actions~~the ~~will be successful~~outcome. We have placed mortgages on our hotel casino property to secure our indebtedness. In the event ~~these~~the ~~actions~~PIK ~~are~~interest ~~unsuccessful~~is not paid on August 25, 2014, among other lesser remedies, the lender may declare all unpaid principal and accrued interest, totaling $987.8 million, under the Amended Facility due and payable immediately~~. To~~, ~~the~~in ~~extent~~which ~~we cannot meet our accelerated demand to meet our debt service obligations~~case, weunder ~~risk~~present ~~losing some or all of our property to foreclosure. If this occurs~~circumstances, ~~our~~the ~~business~~Company ~~and~~would ~~results~~not ofhave ~~operations~~sufficient ~~would~~funds beor ~~materially~~other ~~adversely~~sources ~~affected.~~

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes continuity of operations and realization of assets and liabilities in the ordinary course of business. The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties, including the possibility that the Company loses some or substantially all of its assets to foreclosure as a result of these uncertainties. 5

7of liquidity to pay all such amounts. If this occurs, our business and results of operations would be materially adversely affected. The Company is currently in discussions with the lender but as of the date of the filing the outcome remains uncertain. These uncertainties raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which assumes continuity of operations and realization of assets and liabilities in the ordinary course of business. The condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of uncertainties, including the possibility that the Company loses some or substantially all of its assets to foreclosure as a result of these uncertainties.

2. Basis of Presentation, Principles of Consolidation and Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared under the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) in accordance with the instruction to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X and, therefore, do not include all information and footnotes necessary for complete consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”). These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s ~~2012~~2013 annual consolidated financial statements and notes thereto on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2012~~2013.

The results for the periods indicated reflect all adjustments (consisting primarily of normal recurring adjustments) that management considers necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. The results for such periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.

The preparation of the condensed consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates, and those differences could be material.

Certain amounts reported in the prior period on the condensed consolidated statement of operations have been combined to conform to the current presentation. Retail revenue and other revenue have been combined into entertainment, retail and other revenue and retail expenses and other expenses have been combined into entertainment, retail and other expenses.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries ~~as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the period from March 1, 2011 through September 30, 2011, as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011~~. ~~The information for the period from January 1, 2011 through February 28, 2011 includes the accounts of HRH Holdings.~~

Investment in Joint Venture

In June 2012, CDO Restaurant Associates LLC (“CDO”), a Delaware limited liability company, was formed between the Company and Fox Restaurant Concepts, LLC (“Fox”) to operate a restaurant, Culinary Dropout, using leased space at the Hard Rock Hotel and Casino Las Vegas. The Company contributed 80% of the initial construction and pre-opening budget, or $2.1 million, and also loaned CDO $100,000 to cover preopening costs in excess of initial budgeted amounts. The Company determined that the investment in CDO should be accounted for as an equity method investment. The loan bears interest at the greater of 8% or the reference rate publicly announced by Bank of America N.T. & S.A (3.25% at September 30, 2012) plus 4 percent. Loans are required to be repaid before any other distributions of net cash flow. Net cash flow is then distributed in proportion to the Members’ initial capital contributions, plus an 8% preferred return, and, once paid in full, in accordance with the 50% membership interest. The Company accounts for its investment in CDO under the equity method based on applicable accounting guidance as the Company does not hold a controlling financial interest in CDO. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company recorded a loss of $0.3 million, related to its equity in CDO. The Company’s share of the joint venture’s loss is included in equity in income of joint venture in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. At September 30, 2012, the Company’s net investment in CDO is an asset of $1.8 million. The balance is included in other assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2012. There were no distributions to the members for the nine months ended ended September 30, 2012.

CDO leases space from the Company under a ten-year operating lease expiring in August 2022. The lease has one five-year renewal option. Rent is paid monthly at 6% of sales, as defined in the agreement. CDO also pays a management fee of 6% of gross sales to Fox. Both the lease and the management agreement expire in August of 2022.

Consolidations of Variable Interest Entity

Prior to obtaining the necessary gaming approvals on June 15, 2012, we were prohibited from receiving any revenues of the casino at the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas. As such, we entered into the Casino Lease (as defined below) with LVHR, a licensed third party casino operator, and the Resort Management Agreement (as defined at Note 9, Agreements with Related Parties) with WG-Harmon (as defined below) under which WG-Harmon conducts the gaming and other operations at the casino. The Casino Lease provided for base rent equal to $1.25 million per month. In addition to the base rent, LVHR paid for certain rent-related costs

During the period from March 1, 2011 through June 14, 2012, LVHR was the third party operator of all gaming operations at the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas and the Company did not own any interest in LVHR or its affiliated entities, WG-Harmon, LLC (“WG-Harmon”) and Warner Gaming, LLC. However, the Company, through one of its subsidiaries, entered into a Casino Lease Agreement (“Casino Lease”) with LVHR, pursuant to which it leased the casino premises in exchange for a monthly rent payment. The Casino Lease provided that the Company may terminate the lease upon 30 days prior written notice to LVHR, without payment of any termination fee. In addition, as part of the Casino Lease, the Company was obligated to make available to LVHR a revolving line of credit to be used solely for working capital purposes, specifically to fund any cash flow shortfalls in the casino operations. In addition to the Casino Lease, LVHR and the Company, entered into the Existing Gaming Assets Acquisition Agreement dated as of March 1, 2011, pursuant to which LVHR acquired all of the then existing casino assets used in the gaming operations at the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas. In addition, upon the exercise of the option to acquire the equity of LVHR, the agreement provides for the forgiveness of any accrued rent owed.

HRH Holdings and the Company each evaluate our variable interests to determine if they are variable interests in variable interest entities. LVHR became one of our indirect subsidiaries and we assumed operation of the gaming facilities at the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas on June 15, 2012.

Prior to June 15, 2012, when LVHR became a wholly-owned consolidated subsidiary of the Company, LVHR was consolidated as a variable interest entity as the Company was deemed the primary beneficiary of LVHR as the Company had both (1) the power to direct the activities significantly impacting LVHR's economic performance and (2) the obligation to absorb LVHR's losses. Prior to June 15, 2012, the Company did not own any interest in LVHR or its affiliated entities, WG-Harmon and Warner Gaming, LLC, and LVHR was the third party operator of all gaming operations at the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas.

Due to the consolidation of variable interest entities the following summarized balances of LVHR have been included in our consolidated balance sheets for the periods indicated:

($ in thousands)	December 31, 2011
Assets
Current assets	$	16,453
Long-term assets	12,629
Total assets	$	29,082
Liabilities & Members' Equity
Current liabilities	$	38,818
Long term debt	156
Total liabilities	38,974
Members' equity	(9,892		)
Total liabilities & members' equity	$	29,082

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~June~~May ~~2011~~2014, ~~FASB~~the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued new authoritative guidance ~~for~~regarding the ~~presentation~~recognition of ~~comprehensive~~revenue ~~income.~~from contracts with customers. The new guidance ~~requires~~clarifies ~~that~~the ~~all~~principles ~~non-owner~~for ~~changes~~revenue inrecognition ~~stockholders’~~and ~~equity~~provides bea ~~presented~~common ~~either~~standard infor aall ~~single~~entities ~~continuous~~and ~~statement~~the ofexisting ~~comprehensive~~industry ~~income~~guidance, orincluding inguidance ~~two~~specific ~~separate~~to ~~but~~the ~~consecutive~~gaming ~~statements~~industry, will be eliminated. ~~This~~Under ~~makes~~the new guidance, an entity should recognize revenue to depict the ~~presentation~~transfer of ~~items~~promised ~~within~~goods ~~OCI~~or ~~more~~services ~~prominent.~~to ~~Upon~~customers ~~adoption~~in ofan ~~this~~amount ~~standard,~~that ~~companies~~reflects ~~will~~the noconsideration ~~longer~~to bewhich ~~allowed~~the entity expects to ~~present~~be ~~OCI~~entitled in ~~the~~exchange ~~statement~~for ofthose ~~stockholders'~~goods ~~equity~~or services. Interim ~~The~~and ~~effective~~annual ~~date~~disclosures ~~for~~will ~~this~~also ~~update~~be isrevised. The ~~for~~new ~~years,~~guidance ~~and~~is ~~the~~effective ~~interim~~for ~~periods~~annual ~~within~~reporting ~~those~~periods ~~years,~~ beginning after December 15, ~~2011.~~2016, Asincluding ~~this~~interim isperiods awithin ~~presentation~~that ~~and~~reporting ~~disclosure~~period. Early ~~requirement,~~application is ~~there~~not ~~was~~permitted. The noCompany ~~impact~~is oncurrently ~~our~~assessing ~~condensed~~the ~~consolidated~~impact ~~financial~~of ~~position,~~adopting ~~results~~this ofnew ~~operations~~standard, orwhich ~~cash~~will ~~flows~~be ~~upon~~effective ~~adoption~~for the Company January 1, 2017.

3. Accounts Receivable, Net

Components of accounts receivable, net consist of the following:

($ in thousands)	~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014			December 31, ~~2011~~2013
Casino	$	35,~~608~~558		$	32,~~862~~999
Hotel	4,~~185~~102			32,~~277~~679
Other	3,~~395~~191			23,~~235~~352
	11,188			9,374
	12,851			9,030
Less: allowance for doubtful accounts	(~~1,136~~871		)	(~~1,320~~679		)
Total accounts receivable, net	$	1011,~~052~~980		$	8,~~054~~351

Activity in the allowance for doubtful accounts was as follows:

($ in thousands)
Balance at December 31, 2010	$	591
Additions - bad debt expense	2,476
Deductions - write off net of collections	(2,472		)
Balance at February 28, 2011 (HRH Holdings)	$	595
Balance at March 1, 2011 (Company)	$	—
Additions - bad debt expense	988
Deductions - write off net of collections	450
Balance at September 30, 2011 (Company)	$	1,438
Balance at December 31, 2011 (Company)	$	1,320
Additions - bad debt expense	(301		)
Deductions - write off net of collections	117
Balance at September 30, 2012 (Company)	$	1,136

4. Restricted Cash

Certain of our subsidiaries are obligated to maintain cash reserve funds for a variety of purposes as determined pursuant to the Amended Facility, discussed at Note 10, Debt, including a requirement for the subsidiaries to deposit funds into a replacements and refurbishments reserve fund at amounts equal to three percent of the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas’ gross revenues. Restricted cash consists of the following:

($ in thousands)	~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014		December 31, ~~2011~~2013
Current
Tax reserves	$	12,~~687~~708	$	12,~~921~~602
Insurance reserves	~~808~~686		1,~~222~~329
Other reserves	363		~~1,260~~363
Workers' compensation reserves	~~233~~776		~~229~~775
Total current restricted cash	34,~~092~~533		45,~~632~~069
Long-term
Working capital reserves	1914,~~924~~361		2614,~~554~~399
Available restricted cash reserves for future capital expenditures	252		2,404
Replacements and refurbishments reserves	5,736		4,955
Total long-term restricted cash	20,~~176~~097		2819,~~958~~354
Total restricted cash	$	2324,~~268~~630	$	3324,~~590~~423

5. Inventories

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (determined using the first-in, first-out method), or market. Inventories consist of the following:

($ in thousands)	~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014		December 31, ~~2011~~2013
Restaurants and bars	$	12,~~694~~567	$	1,~~892~~848
Retail merchandise	~~542~~1,125		~~593~~975
Other inventory and operating supplies	73164		84124
Total inventories	$	23,~~309~~856	$	2,~~569~~947

6. Property and Equipment, Net

Property and equipment, net consists of the following:

($ in thousands)	~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014			December 31, ~~2011~~2013
Land	$	115,600		$	115,600
Buildings and land and building improvements	~~340~~343,~~820~~262			~~337~~342,~~314~~159
Furniture, fixtures and equipment	7582,~~478~~020			6979,~~182~~943
Memorabilia	6,~~010~~621			56,~~953~~442
	537,908			528,049
Construction in progress	658			1,683
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization	(35,547		)	(17,038		)
	548,161			545,827
Construction in progress	683			340
Less: accumulated depreciation	(79,699		)	(66,819		)
Total property and equipment, net	$	~~503~~468,~~044~~462		$	~~511~~479,~~351~~008

Depreciation relating to property and equipment ~~for the Company~~ was $6.15 million and $56.73 million for the three months ended ~~September~~ June 30, ~~2012~~2014 and ~~2011~~2013, respectively. Depreciation relating to property and equipment ~~for~~was ~~the~~$12.9 ~~Company~~million ~~was~~and $1812.56 million for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014 and ~~$11.9 million for the seven month period ended September 30~~2013, ~~2011~~respectively.

Depreciation relating to property and equipment for HRH Holdings was$10.3 million for the two month period ended February 28, 2011.

7. Intangible Assets, Net

Intangible assets, net consist of the following:

	December 31, 2011								September 30, 2012
	December 31, 2013										June 30, 2014
($ in thousands)	Gross Carrying Amount		Accumulated ~~Amortization~~Impairment Losses			~~Net~~Accumulated ~~Carrying Amount~~Amortization			~~Gross~~Net Carrying Amount		~~Accumulated~~Gross ~~Impairment~~Carrying ~~Losses~~Amount			Accumulated ~~Amortization~~Impairment Losses			~~Net~~Accumulated ~~Carrying Amount~~Amortization			~~Remaining~~Net ~~life~~Carrying ~~(years)~~Amount		Remaining life (years)
Non-amortizing intangible assets
Hard Rock Licensing	$	55,000	$	—(15,000	)	$	~~55,000~~—		$	5540,000	$	(355,000	)	$	—(15,000	)	$	~~52,000~~—		~~Indefinite~~$	40,000	Indefinite
Future Trademark Licensing	7,000		—			~~7,000~~—			7,000		7,000			—			~~7,000~~—			~~Indefinite~~7,000		Indefinite
	62,000		—(15,000		)	~~62,000~~—			6247,000		(362,000		)	—(15,000		)	~~59,000~~—			47,000
Amortizing intangible assets
In-place contracts	29,000		(2,417		)	26,583			29,000		—			(4,592		)	24,408			Varies
In-place Contracts	29,000		(6,175		)	(8,492		)	14,333		29,000			(6,175		)	(9,493		)	13,333		0 - 7
Monster TM Licensing	2,537		~~(551~~—		)	(1,~~986~~875		)	~~2,537~~662		—2,537			~~(1,047~~—		)	1(2,~~490~~206		)	2331		1
Customer Relationships	3,000		~~(2,500~~—		)	~~500~~(3,000		)	~~3,000~~—		—3,000			~~(3,000~~—		)	—(3,000		)	0—		0
Sponsorship Agreements	1,300		~~(541~~—		)	~~759~~(1,300		)	~~1,300~~—		—1,300			~~(1,029~~—		)	~~271~~(1,300		)	6—		0
Market leases	1,736		(270		)	1,466			1,736		—			(513		)	1,223			1 - 8
Market Leases	1,736		—			(912		)	824		1,736			—			(1,037		)	699		0 - 7
Player relationships	10,000		(1,310		)	8,690			10,000		—			(2,351		)	7,649			8
Player Relationships	10,000		—			(3,854		)	6,146		10,000			—			(4,327		)	5,673		7
Other	2,200		~~(184~~—		)	~~2,016~~(623		)	21,~~200~~577		—2,200			~~(349~~—		)	~~1,851~~(733		)	81,467		7
	49,773		(76,~~773~~175		)	42(20,~~000~~056		)	4923,~~773~~542		—49,773			(126,~~881~~175		)	36(22,~~892~~096		)	21,503
Total
intangibles, net	$	111,773	$	(721,~~773~~175	)	$	~~104~~(20,~~000~~056	)	$	~~111~~70,~~773~~542	$	(3111,~~000~~773	)	$	(1221,~~881~~175	)	$	95(22,~~892~~096	)	$	68,503

The Hard Rock ~~Trademark~~Licensing and ~~future~~Future ~~licensing~~Trademark Licensing rights are not subject to amortization as they have an indefinite useful life. The in-place ~~contacts~~contracts, ~~trade~~Monster ~~names~~TM Licensing, Customer Relationships, Sponsorship Agreements, Market ~~leases~~Leases and ~~other~~Other amortizing intangible assets are being ratably amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life which ranges from one to nine years. Player ~~Relationships~~relationships are amortized on an accelerated basis consistent with the expected timing of the Company’s realization of the economic benefits of such relationships. During the second quarter of 2014, the Company performed an interim

For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recorded amortization expense of $1.5 million and $2.3 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and the seven month ended September 30, 2011, the Company recorded amortization expense of $5.1 million and $5.4 million, respectively. 8

~~Subsequent~~impairment toanalysis ~~September 30, 2012 - Pueblo~~ of ~~Isleta Impairment. On October 13, 2009, HRH Holdings executed a license agreement with~~ the ~~Pueblo of Isleta. Pursuant to the Isleta license agreement, the Company sublicensed certain intellectual property, including the “~~Hard Rock ~~Hotel”~~trademark. ~~and~~This ~~“Hard~~analysis ~~Rock~~resulted ~~Casino” trademarks, to Isleta~~ in ~~connection~~no ~~with a hotel and a casino that Isleta opened in Albuquerque, New Mexico~~impairment. ~~Under~~The ~~the~~fair ~~terms~~value of ~~the Isleta license agreement, Isleta agreed to pay us a certain percentage of its annual gross revenues based on the performance of its~~ Hard Rock ~~Hotel/Casino~~Licensing asat ~~well~~June ~~as certain other license fees. On December 24~~30, ~~2012,~~2014 ~~Isleta~~was ~~and~~determined ~~the~~using ~~Company~~discounted ~~mutually~~cash ~~agreed~~flows toof ~~terminate~~forecasted ~~the~~net ~~Isleta license agreement~~revenues. ~~The~~As ~~termination~~ of ~~the Isleta license agreement occurred on~~ June 30, ~~2013. As part of such termination~~2014, the ~~Company~~total ~~recorded~~carrying anvalue ~~impairment~~ of ~~the~~Hard ~~Isleta~~Rock ~~intangible~~Licensing ~~asset~~Trademark ~~included~~is ~~in other licenses of~~ $~~6.2~~40 million inand ~~December~~is ~~2012.~~at ~~The~~risk ~~$6.2~~of ~~million~~future impairment ~~charge~~if ~~represented~~there ~~discounted~~are ~~future~~adverse ~~licensing~~changes ~~fees included~~ in ~~the~~our ~~March~~significant 1,assumptions ~~2011 fair value related to the agreement~~ which ~~were~~include ~~anticipated~~discount atrate, ~~that~~long-term ~~time~~growth ~~had~~rate, ~~the~~royalty ~~agreement~~rate, ~~continued~~or ~~after~~net ~~June~~revenue ~~30, 2013~~projections.

~~Hard~~For ~~Rock Licensing Impairment. During~~ the ~~second~~three ~~quarter~~months ofended ~~2012~~June 30, ~~with~~2014 ~~forecasted~~and ~~net revenues differing from expectations~~2013, the Company ~~performed~~recorded anamortization ~~interim~~expense ~~impairment analysis~~ of ~~the Hard Rock trademark~~$1.0 ~~This~~million ~~analysis~~and ~~resulted in an impairment charge of~~ $31.07 million, ~~for the second quarter of 2012~~respectively. ~~The~~For ~~fair~~the ~~value~~six ofmonths ~~Hard~~ended ~~Rock~~June ~~Licensing~~30, at2014 ~~September~~and 302013, ~~2012~~the ~~was~~Company ~~determined~~recorded ~~using~~amortization ~~the~~expense ~~discounted~~of ~~cash~~$2.0 ~~flow~~million ofand ~~forecasted~~$3.5 ~~net~~million, ~~revenues~~respectively.

Subsequent to September 30, 2012 - Hard Rock Licensing Impairment. During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Company completed its annual impairment analysis of the Hard Rock trademark, which resulted in an additional impairment charge of $12.0 million due to updated forecasts and market conditions. The fair value of Hard Rock Licensing at December 31, 2012 was determined using the discounted cash flow of forecasted net revenues.

The impairment charges to Hard Rock Licensing were the result of reductions in the projected revenue due to the weak market environment and are included within Impairment of intangible assets reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.

8. Accrued Expenses

Accrued expenses consist of the following:

($ in thousands)	~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014		December 31, ~~2011~~2013
Current
Deferred income	$	31,~~296~~413	$	32,~~202~~013
Capital leases, current	767		1,727
Capital lease obligations	343		391
Advance room, convention and customer deposits	65,~~735~~828		76,~~709~~631
Accrued salaries, payroll taxes and other employee benefits	23,~~373~~667		21,~~929~~163
Accrued miscellaneous taxes	1,~~994~~827		1,~~683~~479
Outstanding gaming chips and tokens	970		1,468
Reserve for legal liability claims	3,877		5,187
Accrued progressive jackpot and slot club payouts and other liabilities	967		465
Other accrued liabilities	4,605		3,952
Reserve for legal liability claims	4,431		1,927
Total current accrued expenses	21,560		20,816
Advance entertainment sales	—		726
Other accrued liabilities	3,363		5,103
Total current accrued expenses	24,896		26,939
Long term
Capital leases, long term	684		1,170
Capital lease obligations	—		177
Total long term accrued expenses	~~684~~—		~~1,170~~177
Total accrued expenses	$	2521,~~580~~560	$	2820,~~109~~993

Certain reclassifications in the above table have been made to prior year amounts to conform to the current year presentation.

9. Agreements with Related Parties

WG-Harmon

During the three months ended ~~September~~ June 30, ~~2012~~2014 and ~~2011~~2013, the Company incurred $01.4 million and $0.45 million, respectively in management fees payable to WG-Harmon under the Management Agreement (Gaming Operations), Amended Resort Management Agreement and Liquor Management and Employee Services Agreement, collectively ("WG-Harmon Agreements"), as defined below which is included in ~~general~~management fee and ~~administrative~~expense reimbursement - related party on the condensed consolidated statement of operations. During the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014 and ~~the seven month ended September 30~~2013, ~~2011,~~ the Company incurred $1.2.6 million and $10.39 million, respectively, in management fees payable under the WG-Harmon Agreements. ~~There~~ ~~were~~As noof ~~amounts~~June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had $1.2 million and $0.1 million, respectively, payable to WG-Harmon aswhich ofis ~~September~~included ~~30,~~in ~~2012~~related ~~and~~party ~~December~~payables ~~31,~~on ~~2011.~~the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Gaming Operations

On March 1, 2011, LVHR entered into the Management Agreement (Gaming Operations) (the “Management Agreement”) with WG-Harmon, pursuant to which WG-Harmon agreed to manage the gaming operations at the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas for LVHR. The term of the Management Agreement began on March 1, 2011 and terminated on June 15, 2012. During the term of the Management Agreement, LVHR paid to WG-Harmon a base fee in the amount of $37,500 per month. LVHR also reimbursed WG-Harmon for reasonable fees and expenses incurred in connection with the performance of WG-Harmon’s duties under such agreement.

On December 22, 2011, the Company received a license from the Nevada Gaming Commission to serve as the operator of the gaming facilities at the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas and we were approved to acquire and own the equity securities of LVHR, subject to the Registration Statement becoming effective. Under Section 12(g)(1) of the Exchange Act, the Registration Statement became effective on December 22, 2011. LVHR became one of our subsidiaries and we assumed operation of the gaming facilities at the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas on June 15, 2012. On or about the same date that LVHR became one of our subsidiaries and we assumed operation of the gaming facilities at the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas, we restructured and converted LVHR from a Nevada corporation to a Nevada limited liability company known as LVHR Casino, LLC. Upon consummation of the restructure and conversion of LVHR: (i) LVHR Casino, LLC became a mortgage borrower under the Amended Facility and the Second Mortgage; (ii) LVHR Casino, LLC continued to own all of the assets that LVHR acquired on March 2, 2011 that are used at the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas gaming operations, and (iii) the revolving line of credit HRHH Gaming was obligated to make available to LVHR terminated. The Management Agreement terminated on June 15, 2012 without payment of any termination fee.

Non-Gaming Operations

On March 1, 2011, the Company and WG-Harmon entered in a Resort Management Agreement (the “Resort Management Agreement”), pursuant to which WG-Harmon managed the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas, other than the gaming operations and the liquor operations. The term of the Resort Management Agreement began on March 1, 2011 and continued until June 15, 2012, the date upon which LVHR became one of our subsidiaries and we assumed the operation of the gaming facilities at the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas. During the term of the Resort Management Agreement, the Company paid to WG-Harmon a base fee in the amount of $122,500 per month. In addition to such base fee, WG-Harmon has an incentive management fee based on performance of the adjusted EBITDA of the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas as set forth in the Resort Management Agreement.

On June 15, 2012, the Resort Management Agreement was replaced by the Amended and Restated Management Agreement (the “Amended Resort Management Agreement”). On June 15, 2012, the Company and WG-Harmon entered into the Amended Resort Management Agreement, pursuant to which WG-Harmon will manage the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas, including the gaming operations and the liquor operations. WG-Harmon is required to use commercially reasonable efforts to operate the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas, and has complete discretion and control in all matters related to the management and operation of the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas. The term of the Amended Resort Management Agreement began on June 15, 2012 and will continue until March 31, 2016. During the term of the Amended Resort Management Agreement, the Company will pay WG-Harmon a base fee in the amount of $160,000 per month, payable monthly, which base fee may be decreased to $150,000 per month if WG-Harmon is no longer providing certain construction services to the Company. In April 2013, a $10,000 reduction to the base fee was put in place. In addition to such base fee, the ~~Owner~~Company will pay WG-Harmon an incentive management fee based on the performance of the adjusted EBITDA of the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas, as set forth in the Amended Resort Management Agreement.

Liquor Management

On March 1, 2011 the Company and WG-Harmon entered into a Liquor Management and Employee Services Agreement (the “Liquor Management Agreement”), relating to non-gaming operations at the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas. The term of the Liquor Management Agreement will terminate concurrently with the termination of the Resort Management Agreement. During the term of the Liquor Management Agreement WG-Harmon will pay to the Company monthly rent of $25,000 and deposit all liquor revenue into a lockbox account maintained by the Company pursuant to the Facility.

Effective December 23, 2011, the Clark County Liquor and Gaming Licensing Board (the “Clark County Board”) approved temporary liquor licenses for the Company to operate the liquor operations at the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas. On April 1, 2012, the Clark County Board approved an extension for the Company to operate the liquor operations at the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas. The Liquor Management Agreement terminated on June 15, 2012, and such responsibilities were absorbed by WG-Harmon under the Amended Resort Management Agreement.

Second Mortgage Loan Agreement

On March 1, 2011, as part of the Assignment, the Company entered into a second mortgage loan agreement with Brookfield Financial (the “Second Mortgage”), a related party. See Note 10, Debt, for further discussion. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~June ~~30, 2012 and the seven months ended September 30, 2011, the Company accrued interest of $3.5 million and $2.1 million, respectively under the Second Mortgage.~~

30, 2014 and 2013, the Company accrued interest of $1.4 million and $1.5 million, respectively, under the Second Mortgage which is included in long-term accrued expenses on the condensed consolidated balance sheets. During the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company accrued interest of $2.8 million and $2.9 million, respectively, under the Second Mortgage which is included in long-term accrued expenses on the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

Investment in Joint Venture

In June 2012, CDO Restaurant Associates LLC (“CDO”), a Delaware limited liability company, was formed between the Company and Fox Restaurant Concepts, LLC (“Fox”) to operate a restaurant, Culinary Dropout, using leased space at the Hard Rock Hotel and Casino Las Vegas. The Company contributed 80% of the initial construction and pre-opening budget, or $2.1 million, and also loaned CDO $100,000 to cover pre-opening costs in excess of initial budgeted amounts. During 2012, the Company loaned CDO an additional $248,000 to cover final construction costs in excess of budgeted amounts. The Company determined that the investment in CDO should be accounted for as an equity method investment. The loans bears interest at the greater of 8% or the reference rate publicly announced by Bank of America N.T. & S.A (3.25% at June 30, 2014) plus 4 percent. Loans are required to be repaid before any other distributions of net cash flow. Net cash flow is then distributed in proportion to the Members’ initial capital contributions, plus an 8% preferred return, and, once paid in full, in accordance with the 50% membership interest. The Company accounts for its investment in CDO under the equity method based on applicable accounting guidance as the Company does not hold a controlling financial interest in CDO.

For the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company recorded income of $12,000 and $57,000, respectively, related to its equity in CDO. For the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, the Company recorded income of $19,000 and loss of $36,000, respectively, related to its equity in CDO. The Company’s share of the joint venture’s income or loss is included in income (loss) on joint venture investment in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company’s net investment in CDO was $1.4 million and $1.4 million, respectively. The balance is included in investment in joint venture in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2014. There were no distributions to the members for the three months ended June 30, 2014. At June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had no loans outstanding from CDO.

10. Debt

The following table presents debt outstanding as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

($ in thousands)	~~Final~~	Face value			Book value			Face value			Book value
Project name/lender	~~maturity~~Maturity	~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014			~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014			December 31, ~~2011~~2013			December 31, ~~2011~~2013
Amended facility -Note A/Vegas HR Private Limited	March 1, 2018 (1)	$	~~546~~583,~~873~~960		$	~~463~~518,~~338~~529		$	~~543~~575,~~554~~213		$	~~456~~504,~~658~~775
Amended facility -Note B/Vegas HR Private Limited	March 1, 2018 (1)	327,290			~~155~~192,~~075~~425			327,290			~~138~~182,~~239~~075
Second Mortgage - Brookfield Financial	March 1, 2018	30,000			1417,~~684~~543			30,000			1316,~~802~~596
Total debt		~~904~~941,~~163~~250			~~633~~728,~~097~~497			~~900~~932,~~844~~503			~~608~~703,~~699~~446
Current portion of long-term debt		—(911,250		)	—(710,954		)	—(902,503		)	—(686,850		)
		$	904,163		$	633,097		$	900,844		$	608,699
Total long term debt		$	30,000		$	17,543		$	30,000		$	16,596

(1) As discussed in Note 1, Company Structure, the PIK interest will become due and payable on August 25, 2014. Currently, the Company does not have sufficient funds to satisfy a demand for the PIK interest payment on August 25, 2014, and therefore, the

Company could be in default upon notification by the lender. Accordingly, the Amended Facility, supplemental interest, and PIK interest is classified as current as of June 30, 2014.

The difference between the face and book value of the debt represents debt discounts that are amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the term of the debt.

Amended Facility – Note A and Note B

On March 1, 2011, as part of the Assignment, the Company assumed the obligations under the Facility and entered into an amendment thereof (as amended, the “Amended Facility”) pursuant to which the land, building and improvements, equipment, fixtures and all personal properties were pledged as security and collateral.

The Amended Facility has a maturity date of March 1, 2018 and provides for interest only at The London InterBank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 2.5% with a 1.5% LIBOR floor (total of 4.0% at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014). In addition, under the Amended Facility supplemental interest is accrued at a rate sufficient to provide for the greater of 6.5% or LIBOR + 4.0% effective interest rate at maturity after consideration of all prior payments of principal and interest. The rates of accrual are dependent on fluctuations in the applicable LIBOR rate. The Amended Facility has a provision whereby if the cash available for debt service is less than the current interest due, the PIK Interest will be automatically added to the outstanding principal balance of the Amended Facility and shall thereafter accrue interest. In addition, excess cash in the cash management account will be applied to the outstanding PIK interest, supplemental interest and principal according to the terms of the Amended Facility.

Second Mortgage

On March 1, 2011, as part of the Assignment, the Company entered into a second mortgage loan agreement with Brookfield Financial (the “Second Mortgage”) in the amount of $30.0 million pursuant to which certain land, building and improvements, equipment, fixtures and personal properties were pledged as security and collateral. The Second Mortgage is subordinate in right of payment to the Amended Facility. The maturity date of the Second Mortgage is March 1, 2018 and provides for an effective interest rate of 15.0% payable at maturity.

The Amended Facility and Second Mortgage include customary affirmative and negative covenants for similar financings, including, among others, restrictive covenants regarding incurrence of liens, sales or assets, distributions to affiliates, changes in business, cancellation of indebtedness, dissolutions, mergers and consolidations, as well as limitations on security issuances, transfers of any of the Company’s real property and removal of any material article of furniture, fixture or equipment from the Company’s real property. As of ~~September~~ June 30, ~~2012~~2014, the Company was in compliance with all covenants.

The outstanding PIK interest related to the Amended Facility as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014 and December 31, ~~2011~~2013 was $1148.56 million and $839.28 million, respectively. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014 and 2013, the ~~seven~~Company recorded PIK interest in the amount of $2.7 million and $2.6 million, respectively. During the six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2011~~2014 and 2013, the Company recorded PIK interest in the amount of $38.37 million and $36.36 million, respectively. See discussion in Note 1 regarding the ~~potential~~ acceleration of PIK interest on March 1, 2014, the forbearance of such obligation until August 25, 2014, and the Company's ability to meet such obligation.

The fair value of our total debt as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014 and December 31, ~~2011~~2013 was ~~approximately~~ $~~578~~555.10 million and $~~622~~641.93 million, respectively, which was determined utilizing a discounted cash flow model. The Company has determined that the fair value of its long-term debt is determined using Level 3 inputs. The discount rate was determined utilizing historical market-based equity returns which are adjusted, as necessary, for entity specific factors.

11. ~~Derivative~~Commitments ~~Instruments~~and Contingencies

Derivative Instruments – Interest Rate Cap Agreements

All derivative instruments are recorded at fair value included in other current assets. The accounting for changes in the fair value of derivative instruments depends on the intended use of the derivative and the resulting designation. Derivative instruments used to hedge the exposure to changes in the fair value of an asset, liability, or firm commitment attributable to a particular risk, such as interest rate risk, are considered fair value hedges. Derivative instruments used to hedge the exposure to variability in expected future cash flows, or other types of forecasted transactions, are considered cash flow hedges.

For derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument is initially reported in other comprehensive income (outside of earnings) and subsequently reclassified to earnings when the hedged transaction affects earnings, and the ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative instrument is recognized directly in earnings. The effectiveness of each hedging relationship is assessed under the hypothetical derivative method, whereby the cumulative change in fair value of the actual derivative instrument is compared to the cumulative change in fair value of a hypothetical derivative instrument having terms that exactly match the critical terms of the hedged transaction. For derivative instruments that do not qualify for hedge accounting or when hedge accounting is discontinued, the changes in fair value of the derivative instrument are recognized directly in earnings.

The objective in using derivative instruments is to add stability to its interest expense and to manage exposure to interest rate movements or other identified risks. Interest rate caps are used as part of a cash flow hedging strategy. Interest rate swaps designated as cash flow hedges involve the receipt of fixed-rate payments in exchange for variable-rate amounts over the life of the agreements without exchange of the underlying principal amount.

Effective March 28, 2012, the Company purchased two interest rate cap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $871.8 million and a LIBOR cap of 1.24025% for $141,980. These interest rate cap agreements matures April 1, 2013. The Company did not designate these interest rate caps for hedge accounting.

Effective March 1, 2011, the Company purchased two interest rate cap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $868.5 million and a LIBOR cap of 1.26575% for $0.4 million. These interest rate cap agreements matured on March 1, 2012. The Company has designated these two interest rate caps for hedge accounting as cash flow hedges. Accordingly, the effective portion of the change in fair value of these derivative instruments is recognized in other comprehensive income (loss).

Derivative Instruments – Fair Value

The Company has determined that its derivative valuations in their entirety are classified in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. To determine the fair value of our interest rate caps the Company utilized the forward yield curve and the market for similar securities. As of September 30, 2012, the fair value of the two interest rate cap agreements was zero included in prepaid expenses and other current assets. As of December 31, 2011, the fair value of the two interest rate cap agreements was zero.

12. Commitments and Contingencies

Legal and Regulatory Proceedings

~~Our~~The ~~subsidiary~~Company ~~HRHH~~and IPaffiliates ~~was~~Brookfield ~~one~~Real ofEstate aFinancial ~~number~~Partners, ~~of defendants (“Defendants”) in an action ("Hard Rock IP Action") commenced by Hard Rock Cafe International (USA)~~LLC, ~~Inc.~~Brookfield ~~(“HRCI”) on September 21~~Financial, ~~2010~~LLC in- ~~the~~Series ~~United States District Court for the Southern District of New York~~B, ~~captioned~~and ~~Hard~~Brookfield ~~Rock~~Asset ~~Cafe~~Management ~~International~~ (~~USA~~US), Inc. v.are ~~Hard~~currently ~~Rock~~amongst ~~Hotel~~a ~~Holdings,~~number ~~LLC, et al. asserting certain failures to comply with the terms and requirements~~ of ~~the~~defendants ~~intellectual~~(“Defendants”) ~~property~~in ~~licensure~~an ~~agreements~~action ~~to which the Company was a party. HRCI also~~ commenced aby ~~separate~~Mace ~~arbitration~~Management ~~proceeding before the American Arbitration Association with respect to certain claims~~Group, ~~originally~~LLC ~~brought~~(“Mace) inand ~~the Hard Rock IP Action~~Mandown, ~~that~~LLC ~~were deemed arbitrable by the judge in that action~~ (“~~HRCI Arbitration~~Mandown”). ~~The~~on ~~HRCI Arbitration arose from the same underlying facts as the Hard Rock IP Action. On~~ June 1312, ~~2013,~~2012 ~~the~~in ~~parties~~Nevada’s ~~reached~~Eighth aJudicial ~~settlement~~District ofCourt ~~both~~in ~~the~~Clark ~~Hard~~County, ~~Rock~~Nevada ~~IP Action and~~ (the ~~HRCI Arbitration (~~“~~HRCI~~Mace/Mandown ~~Settlement~~Action”)~~, and the court entered the order of dismissal of the Hard Rock IP Action on June 13, 2013~~. The ~~terms~~Mace/Mandown ofAction ~~the~~relates ~~HRCI~~to ~~Settlement~~investments domade ~~not~~by ~~have a material effect on our business, or the results of operations or financial condition of the Company.~~ Mace/

S&H Projects (“S&H”) filed a lawsuit against Hard Rock Hotel, Inc. (“HRHI”) on December 3, 2010 with regard to the closure of the Wasted Space lounge in October 2010, (“S&H Matter”). On August 12, 2013, the parties reached a settlement of the S&H Matter. The terms of the S&H Matter settlement do not have a material effect on our business, or the results of operations or financial condition of the Company.

The Company and affiliates Brookfield Real Estate Financial Partners, LLC, Brookfield Financial, LLC - Series B, and Brookfield Asset Management (US), Inc. are currently amongst a number of defendants (“Defendants”) in an action commenced by Mace Management Group, LLC (“Mace) and Mandown, ~~LLC (“Mandown”) on June 12, 2012~~ in ~~Nevada’s Eighth Judicial District Court in Clark County, Nevada (the “Mace/Mandown Action”). The Mace/Mandown Action relates to investments made by Mace/Mandown in~~ Wasted Space Lounge, Rare 120 restaurant, the Johnny Smalls restaurant and Vanity nightclub (collectively, the “Venues”) at the Hard Rock Hotel and Casino Las Vegas. In general, all claims assert that actions taken by Defendants allegedly deprived Mace/Mandown of their initial investment and/or their share of profits from the Venues. The Mace/Mandown Action is in the ~~preliminary~~discovery ~~stages~~phase and management has determined that based on the proceedings to date it does not believe the outcome of this matter will have a material effect on our business, or results of operations or financial condition of the Company.

~~Dolce~~We ~~Group~~are ~~Vegas,~~also ~~LLC~~subject ~~filed~~to a ~~complaint~~variety ~~against~~of ~~the~~other ~~Company,~~claims and ~~affiliates~~lawsuits ~~Brookfield~~that ~~Asset~~arise ~~Management~~in ~~(US),~~the ~~Inc.,~~ordinary ~~and~~course ~~Brookfield~~of ~~Financial,~~our ~~LLC~~business. -We ~~Series~~do B,not inbelieve ~~Nevada’s~~the ~~Eighth~~outcome ~~Judicial~~of ~~District~~these ~~Court,~~and ~~Clark~~the ~~County,~~other ~~Nevada~~matters ondisclosed ~~July~~above ~~13,~~will ~~2011~~have ~~(“Dolce~~a ~~Matter”).~~material ~~The~~effect ~~plaintiff~~on ~~alleges~~our ~~breach~~business, results of ~~contract~~operations ~~with~~or ~~respect~~financial tocondition. ~~plaintiff’s~~As ~~contract~~of toJune 30, ~~develop~~2014, the ~~“Rare~~Company ~~120”~~accrued ~~steakhouse~~approximately ~~concept for Hard Rock Hotel~~$3.1 Onmillion ~~July~~for ~~12,~~all ~~2013,~~loss ~~the~~contingency ~~parties~~matters ~~reached~~and aour ~~settlement~~best estimate of ~~the~~reasonably ~~Dolce~~possible ~~Matter.~~losses ~~The~~in ~~terms~~excess of the ~~Dolce~~amount ~~Matter~~accrued ~~settlement~~is do not ~~have a~~ material ~~effect~~to ~~on our business, or~~ the ~~results of operations or~~ financial ~~condition of the Company~~statements.

On July 27, 2012, the Company received notice of a Demand for Arbitration being filed by Monster Beverage Company (“Monster”) against the Company’s subsidiaries HRHH Hotel/Casino, LLC and HRHH IP, LLC (together the “HRHH Entities”) before the Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Service, or JAMS (the “Monster Beverage Action”). Monster executed a Binding Letter of Intent with HRHH Hotel/Casino, LLC on November 6, 2009 with an effective date of December 31, 2009 (the "LOI") and a Supplement to The Binding Letter of Intent: Acquisition of Rights in Rehab Recovery Supplement Beverage with HRHH IP, LLC, the intellectual property rights holder dated as of December 31, 2009 (the "Supplement," and together with the LOI and Supplement collectively 13

the “Monster Agreement”). The gravamen of the Monster Beverage Action was a dispute between the HRHH Entities and Monster over rights to the “Rehab” beverage marks and brand. On August 16, 2013, the arbitrator issued a final arbitration award in favor of Monster which is currently pending appeal. Based upon the terms of the final arbitration award, the outcome of the Monster Beverage Action will not have a material effect on our business, or the results of operations or financial condition of the Company.

We are also subject to a variety of other claims and lawsuits that arise in the ordinary course of our business. We do not believe the outcome of these and the other matters disclosed above will have a material effect on our business, results of operations or financial condition. As of September 30, 2012, the Company accrued approximately $3.5 million for all loss contingency matters and our best estimate of reasonably possible losses in excess of the amount accrued is not material to the financial statements.

13. Restatement to the 2011 Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

The previously issued unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the three months and seven months ended September 30, 2011 have been restated to correct errors in the accounting for the acquisition of the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas and other identified immaterial errors. Subsequent to the issuance of the September 30, 2011 interim unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company, an error from an oversight and misuse of facts was identified in forecasts which had been used to estimate the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition of the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas as of March 1, 2011. As a result, the Company has corrected the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, which as of March 1, 2011 are in aggregate approximately $707.5 million and $622.5 million, respectively. The previously recorded fair values of the assets and liabilities had been $894.8 million and $767.2 million, respectively.

Specifically, the Company determined that certain cash flow forecasts and discount rates used in the initial determination of fair values did not reflect market conditions at March 1, 2011. The key assumptions that were corrected and their effect on the valuation are as follows:

• The Company has reduced estimated debt free net cash flow for the base year from $41.5 million to $35.8 million and reduced estimated terminal year debt free net cash flow from $90.8 million to $85.5 million. Utilizing an appropriate multiple the estimated terminal value was reduced from $908 million to $760 million. The discount rate used was increased from 13% to 14%. These changes decreased business enterprise value (“BEV”) by approximately $110 million.

• The Company has determined that there was value as of the March 1, 2011 acquisition date related to certain specific new initiatives, specifically the addition of or planned changes to the clubs and restaurants at Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas, as well as additional expected trademark licensing fee agreements. Due to the valuation and the purchase price accounting errors identified, management corrected certain of the assumptions in the valuation of the planned new initiatives to reflect the market conditions and the risk associated with uncertainty in the forecasted net revenues from the new initiatives, reducing the estimated net cash flows and increasing the discount rates used from 17% to 35%. These changes decreased BEV by approximately $80 million.

• The Company has changed the discount rates used to fair value the assumed mortgage debt to reflect the market conditions and the risk associated with the arrangements. Based on the reduced business enterprise value, management determined that the face amount of the mortgage significantly exceeded fair value of the assets of Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas and adjusted the discount rates to reflect the risk associated with the arrangements. These changes decreased the fair value of the mortgage by approximately $170 million.

The effects of the restatement on the estimated fair value of the assets and liabilities acquired are as follows as of March 1, 2011:

($ in thousands)	As Previously Reported		Adjustment			As Restated
Land, buildings and equipment	$	659,330	$	(135,399	)	$	523,931
Intangible assets	185,265		(73,492		)	111,773
Other assets	50,236		21,589			71,825
Total assets	$	894,831	$	(187,302	)	$	707,529
Long term debt	$	722,282	$	(139,500	)	$	582,782
Other liabilities	44,966		(5,265		)	39,701
Total liabilities	$	767,248	$	(144,765	)	$	622,483

As a result of the restatement of the accounting for the initial acquisition, amounts that had been recognized in the interim unaudited condensed consolidated statement of operations related to the amortization or depreciation of assets acquired have also been restated. In addition, the interim information referred to above has been restated to correct other immaterial misstatements, both individually and in the aggregate, including the recording of depreciation for memorabilia and management fee estimates identified during the preparation of our consolidated financial statements of the period from March 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 that were not related to the accounting for the acquisition of the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas.

In addition to the restatement noted above, the Company corrected errors due to the oversight of underlying information in the preparation of the consolidated statement of cash flows from operating activities for the period from March 1, 2011 to September 30, 2011:

• Principal payments on capital leases had been incorrectly included in cash flows from operating activities in other accrued liabilities. Such amounts should have been included in cash flows used in financing activities.

• Changes in restricted cash accounts had been incorrectly reported on a net basis in investing activities rather than separately as gross inflows and outflows in cash flows from investing activities.

The table below reflects the restated and previously reported Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations:

	Period from March 1, 2011 to September 30, 2011
($ in thousands)	As Previously reported			Adjustment			As Restated
Revenue:
Casino	$	26,023		$	(406	)	$	25,617
Lodging	36,692			(497		)	36,195
Food and beverage	54,629			497			55,126
Retail	1,858			—			1,858
Other	17,428			(1,129		)	16,299
Gross revenues	136,630			(1,535		)	135,095
Less: Promotional allowances	(10,695		)	—			(10,695		)
Net revenues	125,935			(1,535		)	124,400
Costs and Expenses:
Casino	21,393			(43		)	21,350
Lodging	11,757			—			11,757
Food and beverage	28,214			444			28,658
Retail	1,197			—			1,197
Other	9,588			43			9,631
Marketing	3,376			—			3,376
Fee and expense reimbursements - related party	1,960			(362		)	1,598
General and administrative	22,746			(428		)	22,318
Depreciation and amortization	19,494			(2,169		)	17,325
Loss on disposal of assets	615			(615		)	—
Pre-opening	146			—			146
Total costs and expenses	120,486			(3,130		)	117,356
Income from operations	5,449			1,595			7,044
Interest income	47			—			47
Interest expense	(44,018		)	(2,725		)	(46,743		)
Net Loss	(38,522		)	(1,130		)	(39,652		)
Other Comprehensive loss:				—
Interest rate cap fair market value adjustment, net of tax	(335		)	141			(194		)
Comprehensive loss	$	(38,857	)	$	(989	)	$	(39,846	)

The table below reflects the restated and previously reported Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations:

	Period from July 1, 2011 to September 30, 2011
($ in thousands)	As Previously reported			Adjustment			As Restated
Revenue:
Casino	$	11,281		$	(459	)	$	10,822
Lodging	15,403			(248		)	15,155
Food and beverage	21,628			248			21,876
Retail	815			—			815
Other	7,536			(880		)	6,656
Gross revenues	56,663			(1,339		)	55,324
Less: Promotional allowances	(4,622		)	—			(4,622		)
Net revenues	52,041			(1,339		)	50,702
Costs and Expenses:
Casino	9,785			(428		)	9,357
Lodging	4,979			8			4,987
Food and beverage	11,889			177			12,066
Retail	539			—			539
Other	3,759			43			3,802
Marketing	1,422			(1		)	1,421
Fee and expense reimbursements - related party	612			(170		)	442
General and administrative	10,089			(292		)	9,797
Depreciation and amortization	8,519			(1,121		)	7,398
Loss on disposal of assets	615			(615		)	—
Pre-opening	146			—			146
Total costs and expenses	52,354			(2,399		)	49,955
(Loss) income from operations	(313		)	1,060			747
Interest income	24			—			24
Interest expense	(18,962		)	(1,562		)	(20,523		)
Net loss	(19,251		)	(502		)	(19,752		)
Other Comprehensive loss:				—
Interest rate cap fair market value adjustment, net of tax	(2		)	141			139
Comprehensive loss	$	(19,253	)	$	(361	)	$	(19,613	)

	Period from March 1, 2011 to September 30, 2011
($ in thousands)	As Previously reported			Adjustment			As Restated
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(38,522	)	$	(1,130	)	$	(39,652	)
Adjustment to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation	15,985			(4,100		)	11,885
Gain on forgiveness of debt	—			—			—
Provision for (write off of) doubtful accounts	2,395			(1,407		)	988
Amortization of intangibles	3,508			1,933			5,441
Amortization of fair value adjustments of debt	10,288			1,812			12,100
Accrued non-cash interest applied to principal	2,325			972			3,297
Change in value of interest rate caps net of
premium amortization included in net loss	33			—			33
Loss on sale of assets	615			(559		)	56
(Increase) decrease in assets:
Accounts receivable	(2,447		)	1,686			(761		)
Inventories	(341		)	—			(341		)
Prepaid expenses	(2,156		)	(132		)	(2,288		)
Related party receivable	—			(211		)	(211		)
Increase (decrease) in liabilities:
Accounts payable	(3,689		)	369			(3,320		)
Related party payable	151			(151		)	—
Other accrued liabilities	(2,247		)	1,867			(380		)
Accrued long term interest payable	9,614			792			10,406
Net cash (used in) operating activities	(4,488		)	1,741			(2,747		)
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of property and equipment	(2,932		)	(322		)	(3,254		)
Payments on construction related payables	(190		)	—			(190		)
Restricted cash contributions	—			(38,958		)	(38,958		)
Restricted cash withdrawals	—			10,724			10,724
Increase (reduction) in restricted cash	(28,002		)	28,002			—
Proceeds from sale of operating assets	10			—			10
Net cash used in investing activities	(31,114		)	(554		)	(31,668		)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from borrowings	30,000			(17,000		)	13,000
Proceeds from members' equity contribution	(121		)	18,748			18,627
Repayments on borrowings	(372		)	(721		)	(1,093		)
Purchase of interest rate caps	—			(372		)	(372		)
Principal payments on capital leases	—			(2,395		)	(2,395		)
Net cash provided by financing activities	29,507			(1,740		)	27,767
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(6,095		)	(553		)	(6,648		)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	20,191			—			20,191
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	14,096		$	(553	)	$	13,543
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Cash paid during the period for interest, net
of amounts capitalized	$	21,631		$	(3,099	)	$	18,532
Supplemental Disclosure Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities
Construction related payables	$	1,110		$	(718	)	$	392

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), provide a safe harbor for “forward-looking statements” made by or on behalf of a company. We may from time to time make written or oral statements that are “forward-looking,” including statements contained in this report and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), which represent our expectations or beliefs concerning future events. Statements containing expressions such as “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects” or other similar words or expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We caution that these and similar statements are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions and changes in circumstances that may cause our actual results to differ significantly from those expressed in any forward-looking statement. Although we believe our expectations are based upon reasonable assumptions within the bounds of our knowledge of our business and operations, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Important risks and factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from any forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, continued adverse economic and market conditions, particularly in levels of spending in the hotel, resort and casino industry in Las Vegas, Nevada; the seasonal nature of the hotel, casino and resort industry; the use of the “Hard Rock” brand name by entities other than us; costs associated with compliance with extensive regulatory requirements; increases in interest rates and operating costs; increases in uninsured and underinsured losses; risks associated with conflicts of interest with entities which control us; the loss of key members of our senior management; the impact of any material litigation; risks related to natural disasters; changes in the competitive environment in our industry; hostilities, including future terrorist attacks, or fear of hostilities that affect travel; and other risks discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2012~~2013 and subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q in the section entitled “Risk Factors” and in this report in the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.” Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date thereof. We undertake no obligation to publicly release any revisions to such forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof.

Overview

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2012~~2013 and our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report. In addition to historical information, the following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in any forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including but not limited to, those factors set forth in the section entitled “Forward-Looking Statements” and elsewhere in this report and in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2012~~2013 and subsequently filed Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q.

Within this management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operation for the ~~period~~three ~~from~~months ~~March 1,~~ended ~~2011 to September 30, 2011~~ and ~~for~~six ~~the nine~~ months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014 and 2013, references to the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to BREF HR, LLC~~, and references to “HRH Holdings” for the period from January 1, 2011 to February 28, 2011 refer to Hard Rock Hotel Holdings, LLC~~.

The following discussion and analysis covers periods both prior and subsequent to the Assignment as discussed in Item 1. HRH Holdings’ historical consolidated financial statements included herein represent the financial condition, results of operations and liquidity of the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino during the period prior to March 1, 2011. Our historical consolidated financial statements included herein for the period following the closing of the Assignment represent our financial condition, results of operation and liquidity after the Assignment. As a result of various factors, the financial condition, results of operations and liquidity for the periods beginning on or after March 1, 2011 may not be comparable to the information prior to that date. For comparative purposes, below we have included the combined results of operations for the quarter ended September 30, 2011, which include periods of operation by HRH Holdings and the Company. While the Company believes that a comparison of the results of operations for this period provides useful information regarding the changes in operating data between the periods, not all of the data is comparable due to the impact that the Assignment has had on the amount of interest expense and depreciation and amortization we incur.

As is customary for companies in the gaming industry, we present average occupancy rate and average daily rate for the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas including rooms provided on a complimentary basis. Operators of hotels in the lodging industry generally may not follow this practice, as they may present average occupancy rate and average daily rate net of rooms provided on a complimentary basis. We calculate (a) average daily rate by dividing total daily lodging revenue by total daily rooms rented and (b) average occupancy rate by dividing total rooms occupied by total number of rooms available. We account for lodging revenue on a daily basis. Rooms provided on a complimentary basis include rooms provided free of charge or at a discount to the rate normally charged to customers as an incentive to use the casino. Complimentary rooms reduce average daily rate for a given period to the extent the provision of such rooms reduces the amount of revenue we would otherwise receive.

The following are key gaming industry-specific measurements we use to evaluate casino revenues. “Table game drop,” and “slot machine handle” ~~and “race and sports book write”~~ are used to identify the amount wagered by patrons for a casino table game, ~~slot machine or racing events~~ and ~~sports~~slot ~~games~~machine, respectively. “Drop” and “Handle” are abbreviations for table game drop and slot machine handle. “Table game hold percentage,” and “slot machine hold percentage” ~~and “race and sports book hold percentage”~~ represent the percentage of the total amount wagered by patrons that the casino has won. Such hold percentages are derived by dividing the amount won by the casino by the amount wagered by patrons. Based on historical experience, in the normal course of business we expect table games net hold percentage for any period to be within the range of 12% to 16% and slot machine hold percentage for any period to be within the range of 4% to 7%. For the period beginning on March 1, 2011 the Company is beneficiary of rental payments under the Casino Lease, which includes results relating to the sports book and other operations at the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas for which LVHR receives certain rental payments.

The previously reported amounts for the period from March 1, 2011 to September 30, 2011 and July 1, 2011 to September 30, 2011 have been adjusted to reflect the restatement discussed at Note 13 to our condensed consolidated financial statements. 14

24Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2014 Compared to the Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2013

Results of Operations of the Company for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2012 Compared to the Results of Operations of the Company for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2011



							$ Change			% Change
($ in thousands)	Three months ended June 30, 2014			Three months ended June 30, 2013			2014 vs 2013
Statement of Operations Data:
Revenues
Casino	$	12,194		$	9,989		$	2,205		22.1	%
Lodging	17,741			17,254			487			2.8
Food and beverage	24,703			24,808			(105		)	(0.4	)
Entertainment, retail and other	7,619			10,318			(2,699		)	(26.2	)
Gross revenues	62,257			62,369			(112		)	(0.2	)
Less: Promotional allowances	(4,976		)	(5,159		)	183			3.5
Net revenues	57,281			57,210			71			0.1

Costs and Expenses
Casino	9,052			8,678			374			4.3
Lodging	5,536			5,044			492			9.8
Food and beverage	14,131			13,669			462			3.4
Entertainment, retail and other	4,888			6,883			(1,995		)	(29.0	)
Marketing	2,242			2,414			(172		)	(7.1	)
Management fee and expense reimbursements - related party	1,417			463			954			206.0
General and administrative	8,608			11,054			(2,446		)	(22.1	)
Depreciation and amortization	7,456			7,972			(516		)	(6.5	)
Pre-opening	—			2			(2		)	(100.0	)
Total costs and expenses	53,330			56,179			(2,849		)	(5.1	)
Income (loss) from operations	3,951			1,031			2,920			283.2
Interest income	3			10			(7		)	(70.0	)
Interest expense	(24,722		)	(24,127		)	(595		)	(2.5	)
Income (loss) on joint venture investment	12			57			(45		)	(78.9	)
Net loss	$	(20,756	)	$	(23,029	)	$	2,273		9.9	%

							$ Change			% Change
($ in thousands)	Three months ended September 30, 2012			Three months ended September 30, 2011			2012 vs 2011
Statement of Operations Data:
Revenue
Casino	$	11,342		$	10,822		$	520		4.8	%
Lodging	15,469			15,155			314			2.1
Food and beverage	20,781			21,876			(1,095		)	(5.0	)
Retail	732			815			(83		)	(10.2	)
Other	6,025			6,656			(631		)	(9.5	)
Gross revenues	54,349			55,324			(975		)	(1.8	)
Less: Promotional allowances	(4,625		)	(4,622		)	(3		)	(0.1	)
Net revenues	49,724			50,702			(978		)	(1.9	)
Costs and Expenses:
Casino	9,004			9,357			(353		)	(3.8	)
Lodging	5,275			4,987			288			5.8
Food and beverage	11,973			12,066			(93		)	(0.8	)
Retail	405			539			(134		)	(24.9	)
Other	3,581			3,802			(221		)	(5.8	)
Marketing	2,041			1,421			620			43.6
Fee and expense reimbursements	450			442			8			1.8
General and administrative	10,144			9,797			347			3.5
Depreciation and amortization	7,595			7,398			197			2.7
Pre-opening	89			146			(57		)	(39.0	)
Total costs and expenses	50,557			49,955			602			1.2
(Loss) income from operations	(833		)	747			(1,580		)	(211.5	)
Interest income	4			24			(20		)	(83.3	)
Interest expense	(22,506		)	(20,523		)	(1,983		)	(9.7	)
Loss on joint venture investment	(324		)	—			(324		)	100.0
Gain on forgiveness of debt	—			—			—			—
Net (Loss) income	$	(23,659	)	$	(19,752	)	$	(3,907	)	(19.8	)%

Casino Revenues. The increase in casino revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2014 are primarily due as follows:

~~Casino~~Table ~~Revenues~~Games. ~~The~~Table ~~Company~~games ~~did not directly earn any casino~~ revenues, for the ~~period~~three ~~from~~months ~~March~~ended June 130, ~~2011~~2014 toincreased ~~September~~$1.4 ~~30,~~million ~~2011~~or ~~and~~28.0% ~~until~~to ~~June 15, 2012~~$6.6 ~~However,~~million ~~the~~when ~~Company~~compared ~~has~~to ~~included~~the ~~revenues~~same ~~earned~~period byin ~~LVHR~~2013. ~~during~~Table ~~such~~games ~~period~~hold inpercentage ~~its~~increased ~~consolidated~~to ~~financial~~11.3% ~~statements~~from in9.1%. ~~accordance~~The ~~with~~increase ~~applicable~~was ~~guidance~~driven ~~relating~~by toan ~~variable~~increase ~~interest~~in ~~entities~~blackjack hold.

~~Casino~~Slot. Slot machine revenues for the three months ended ~~September~~ June 30, ~~2012~~2014 increased $0.57 million or 14.8% to $115.34 million when compared to the same period in ~~2011~~2013. Slot machine hold percentage increased to 6.0% from 5.7%. The increase in ~~casino~~slot revenues was primarily ~~due~~the toresult of a $07.~~1 million or 1.8~~7% increase in slot ~~revenue~~handle ~~and~~combined awith ~~$0.4~~the ~~million or 5.3%~~ increase in ~~table~~slot ~~games~~machine ~~revenue~~hold.

~~Slot~~Lodging Revenues. ~~Slot~~The ~~machine~~increase in lodging revenues for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014 ~~increased~~was ~~$0.1~~primarily ~~million~~due to ~~$4.2~~an ~~million~~increase ~~when compared to the same period~~ in ~~2011.~~total ~~Slot~~occupied ~~machine~~rooms ~~handle~~of ~~increased~~3,412 ~~$11.6 million from $70.4 million~~ to ~~$82~~131,284.0 ~~million. Slot machine hold percentage decreased to 5.1% from 5.7%.~~ The ~~number~~increase ~~of slot machines~~ in ~~operation~~total ~~increased~~occupied torooms ~~665~~is ~~from~~driven ~~606,~~by an increase ~~of 59 machines. The net result of these changes~~ in ~~handle,~~group ~~hold~~room ~~percentage and average number of slot machines in operation was a decrease in net win per slot machine per day to $68~~occupancy.14 ~~from $71.79, a decrease of $3.64 or 5.1%.~~

25Entertainment, Retail and Other Revenues. The decrease in entertainment, retail and other revenues for the three months ended June 30, 2014 was primarily due to fewer entertainment events during the second quarter of 2014 compared to the same period in the prior year.

~~Table~~Casino ~~Games~~Expenses. Table games revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2012 increased $0.4 million to $7.0 million when compared to the same period in 2011. Table games drop decreased $13.6 million or 20.8% to $51.7 million. Table games hold percentage increased 3.4% to 13.6% from 10.2%. The ~~average number of table games in operations decreased to 74 from 96 tables. The net result of these changes in drop and hold percentage was an~~ increase in ~~win~~casino ~~per~~expenses table game per day to $1,028 from $756, or 35.9%. We have historically reported table games hold percentage using the gross method, while casinos on the Las Vegas Strip report hold percentage using the net method (which reduces the table game drop by marker repayments made in the gaming pit area). For the purpose of comparison to properties on the Las Vegas Strip, our net hold percentage for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014 was ~~16.5%~~primarily ~~compared~~due to ~~13.4%~~cost ~~for~~incurred ~~the~~by ~~three months ended September 30, 2011. Management believes~~ the ~~decrease~~Company into ~~table~~provide ~~games~~increased ~~drop~~complementaries ~~was~~and ~~due~~promotions to ~~increased competition coupled with ongoing construction projects on the~~ casino ~~floor~~customers.

Lodging ~~Revenues~~Expenses. ~~Lodging~~The ~~revenues~~increase in lodging expenses for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014 ~~increased $0.3 million to $15.5 million when compared to the same period in 2011. The increase in lodging revenues~~ was primarily due to ahigher ~~3.3% increase in total occupied rooms to 115,077 from 111,447~~ payroll and arelated ~~decrease in the average daily rate of $4~~expenses.49 ~~to $130.27 or 3.3%.~~

Food and Beverage Revenues. Food and beverage revenues for the three months ended September 30, 2012 decreased $1.1 million to $20.8 million when compared to the same period in 2011. The $1.1 million decrease in food and beverage revenues was primarily due to a decline in business volumes at the restaurants, bars, and night club partially offset by an increase in pool revenues associated with improved programing. 15

~~Retail~~Food ~~Revenues~~and Beverage Expenses. ~~Retail~~The ~~revenues~~increase in food and beverage expenses for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014 ~~decreased~~was ~~$0.1~~primarily ~~million~~due to ~~$0.7~~increased ~~million~~artist ~~when~~fees ~~compared~~from topool-related ~~the same period in 2011~~events.

Entertainment, Retail and Other ~~Revenues~~Expenses. ~~Other~~The ~~revenues~~decrease in entertainment, retail and other expenses for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014 ~~decreased~~was ~~$0.6~~primarily ~~million~~due to ~~$6.0~~a ~~million when compared to the same period in 2011. The~~ decrease in ~~other~~artist ~~revenues~~fees ~~was~~and ~~primarily~~related ~~due~~production tocosts ~~the~~from ~~decline~~Joint concerts in ~~licensing income~~2014.

~~Promotional~~General ~~Allowances~~and Administrative. ~~Promotional~~The ~~allowances~~decrease ~~furnished~~in togeneral ~~customers~~and onadministrative aexpenses ~~complimentary basis~~ for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014 ~~remained~~was atprimarily ~~$4.6 million when compared to~~ the ~~same~~result ~~period in 2011. As a percentage~~ of ~~gross~~lower ~~revenues,~~non-recurring ~~promotional~~expenses ~~allowances~~associated ~~increased~~with ~~to 8.5% compared to 8.3% for~~ the ~~three~~timing ~~months~~of ~~ended~~certain ~~September~~legal ~~30, 2011~~matters.

~~Casino~~Depreciation ~~Expenses~~and Amortization. ~~Casino~~The decrease in depreciation and amortization expenses for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014 ~~decreased $0.4 million or 3.8% to $9.0 million when compared to the same period in 2011. The decrease~~ was primarily ~~due to a decrease in~~ the ~~estimated~~result ~~cost~~of ~~incurred~~intangible byassets ~~the~~becoming ~~Company~~fully ~~to provide complementaries to casino customers~~amortized.

~~Lodging~~Interest ~~Expenses~~Expense. ~~Lodging~~The ~~expenses~~increase in interest expense for the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014 ~~increased~~was ~~$0.3 million or 5.8% to $5.3 million when compared to~~ the ~~same~~result ~~period~~of inan ~~2011.~~increase ~~Lodging expenses~~ in ~~relation~~the toamount ~~lodging~~of ~~revenues~~debt ~~increased~~as toa ~~34.1%~~result ~~for~~of ~~the~~interest ~~three~~being ~~months~~paid ~~ended September 30, 2012. The increase~~ in ~~lodging~~kind ~~expenses~~during ~~was~~2013 ~~primarily~~and ~~due to operating cost associated with~~ the ~~increase~~first insix ~~occupied~~months ~~rooms~~of 2014.

~~Food~~Results ~~and~~of ~~Beverage~~Operations ~~Expenses. Food and beverage expenses~~ for the ~~three~~Six ~~months~~Months ~~ended~~Ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014 ~~decreased~~Compared ~~$0.1 million~~ to ~~$12.0~~the ~~million~~Results orof ~~0.8%~~Operations ~~when~~for ~~compared to~~ the ~~same~~Six ~~period~~Months inEnded ~~2011.~~June ~~Food~~30, ~~and~~2013 ~~beverage expenses in relation to food and beverage revenues increased to 57.6% from 55.2% in the prior period.~~

Retail Expenses. Retail expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2012 decreased $0.1 million or 24.9% to $0.4 million when compared to the same period in 2011. Retail expenses in relation to retail revenues decreased to 55.3% from 66.1%.



							$ Change			% Change
($ in thousands)	Six Months Ended June 30, 2014			Six Months Ended June 30, 2013			2014 vs 2013
Statement of Operations Data:
Revenues
Casino	$	26,132		$	23,183		$	2,949		12.7	%
Lodging	34,959			32,325			2,634			8.1
Food and beverage	41,227			41,295			(68		)	(0.2	)
Entertainment, retail and other	13,523			18,551			(5,028		)	(27.1	)
Gross revenues	115,841			115,354			487			0.4
Less: Promotional allowances	(9,447		)	(10,684		)	1,237			11.6
Net revenues	106,394			104,670			1,724			1.6

Costs and Expenses
Casino	16,739			18,412			(1,673		)	(9.1	)
Lodging	11,156			9,773			1,383			14.2
Food and beverage	24,473			22,619			1,854			8.2
Entertainment, retail and other	8,939			11,985			(3,046		)	(25.4	)
Marketing	4,650			4,445			205			4.6
Management fee and expense reimbursements - related party	2,606			914			1,692			185.1
General and administrative	17,349			20,748			(3,399		)	(16.4	)
Depreciation and amortization	14,919			16,041			(1,122		)	(7.0	)
Pre-opening	—			10			(10		)	(100.0	)
Total costs and expenses	100,831			104,947			(4,116		)	(3.9	)
Income (loss) from operations	5,563			(277		)	5,840			2,108.3
Interest income	6			16			(10		)	(62.5	)
Interest expense	(50,007		)	(47,279		)	(2,728		)	(5.8	)
Income (loss) on joint venture investment	19			36			(17		)	(47.2	)
Net loss	$	(44,419	)	$	(47,504	)	$	3,085		6.5	%

~~Other~~Casino ~~Expenses~~Revenues. ~~Other~~The ~~expenses~~increase in casino revenues for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014 ~~decreased~~are ~~$0.2 million or 5.8% to $3.6 million compared to the same period in 2011. This decrease was~~ primarily due toas ~~a decrease in artist fees and related production costs.~~ follows:

~~Marketing~~Table Games. ~~Marketing~~Table ~~expenses~~games revenues for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014 increased $01.6 million or 4311.69% to $214.09 million when compared to the same period in ~~2011~~2013. ~~Marketing~~Table ingames ~~relation~~hold topercentage ~~gross revenues~~ increased to 312.85% from 210.63%. The increase ~~in marketing expenses~~ was ~~primarily~~driven ~~due~~by to an increase in ~~advertising~~blackjack ~~and personnel in an effort to drive brand awareness in our competitive market~~hold.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2012 increased $0.3 million or 3.5% to $10.1 million when compared to the same period in 2011. General and administrative expenses in relation to 16

26Slot. Slot machine revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2014 increased $1.3 million or 13.5% to $10.9 million when compared to the same period in 2013. Slot machine hold percentage increased to 6.0% from 5.7%. The increase in slot revenues was primarily the result of a 7.8% increase in slot handle combined with the increase in slot machine hold.

~~gross~~Lodging Revenues. The increase in lodging revenues ~~increased~~for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was primarily due to ~~18.7%~~an increase in the average daily rate from 17$129 to $133 or 3.73% and an increase in total occupied rooms of 11,308 to 259,684. The increase in ~~general~~the average daily rate and ~~administrative~~total ~~was~~occupied ~~primarily~~rooms ~~due~~is todriven by an increase in ~~management~~group ~~incentive~~room occupancy.

~~Depreciation~~Entertainment, Retail and ~~Amortization~~Other Revenues. ~~Depreciation~~The decrease in entertainment, retail and ~~amortization~~other ~~expense~~revenues for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014 ~~increased~~was ~~$0.2~~primarily ~~million~~due orto ~~2.7%~~fewer toentertainment ~~$7.6~~events ~~million~~during ~~when~~the second quarter of 2014 compared to the same period in ~~2011. The increase in depreciation and amortization expense is a result of~~ the ~~addition~~prior ~~of assets during 2012~~year.

~~Interest~~Promotional ~~Expense~~Allowances. ~~Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2012 increased $2.0 million or 9.7% to $22.5 million when compared to the same period in 2011.~~ The ~~increase~~decrease in ~~interest~~promotional ~~expense~~allowances isfor ~~primarily~~ the ~~result~~six of amounts paid in kind during the period. In addition, a total of $7.3 million of interest expense is a result of debt discount amortization under the Amended Facility and Second Mortgage during the three months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014 ~~compared~~was toprimarily ~~$5.4~~due ~~million~~to ~~during~~a ~~the~~change ~~three~~in ~~months~~promotional ~~ended~~marketing ~~September~~strategy ~~30,~~to ~~2011~~casino customers.

~~Results~~Casino ofExpenses. ~~Operations~~The ofdecrease ~~the~~in ~~Company~~casino expenses for the ~~Nine~~six ~~Months~~months ~~Ended~~ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014 ~~Compared~~was toprimarily ~~the~~due ~~Combined~~to ~~Results~~decline ofin ~~Operations~~costs ofincurred by the Company ~~and~~to ~~HRH~~provide ~~Holdings~~complementaries ~~for~~to ~~the~~casino ~~Nine~~customers. ~~Months Ended September 30, 2011~~

~~The~~Food ~~following table presents results of operations data as reported in the Company’s~~ and ~~HRH~~Beverage ~~Holdings’~~Expenses. ~~consolidated~~The ~~financial~~increase ~~statements prepared~~ in ~~accordance~~food ~~with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”). GAAP requires that we separately present the Company~~ and ~~HRH~~beverage ~~Holdings~~expenses ~~results. Management believes reviewing the operating results~~ for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014 bywas ~~combining~~primarily the ~~results~~result of ~~the~~a ~~HRH~~change ~~Holdings and Company periods is more useful~~ in ~~identifying~~promotional ~~any~~marketing ~~trends~~strategy in, or reaching conclusions regarding, our overall operating performance. Accordingly, the table below presents the non-GAAP combined results for the nine months ended September 30, 2011, which is also the period we compare when computing percentage change from prior year, as we believe this presentation provides the most meaningful basis for comparison of our results and it is how management reviews operating performance. The combined operating results may not reflect the actual results we would have achieved had the Assignment closed prior to ~~March~~casino ~~1, 2011 and may not be predictive of future results of operations~~customers.

27Entertainment, Retail and Other Expenses. The decrease in entertainment, retail and other expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was primarily due to a decrease in artist fees and related production costs from Joint concerts in 2014.

	Company						Company			HRH Holdings			$ Change			% Change
($ in thousands)	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2011 (Combined)			Period from Mar 1, 2011 to September 30, 2011			Period fromJan 1, 2011toFeb 28, 2011			2012 vs 2011
Statement of Operations Data:
Revenue
Casino	$	33,464		$	31,590		$	25,617		$	5,973		$	1,874		5.9	%
Lodging	48,405			45,417			36,195			9,222			2,988			6.6
Food and beverage	64,310			67,516			55,126			12,390			(3,206		)	(4.7	)
Retail	2,154			2,284			1,858			426			(130		)	(5.7	)
Other	22,252			20,890			16,299			4,591			1,362			6.5
Gross revenues	170,585			167,697			135,095			32,602			2,888			1.7
Less: Promotional allowances	(15,311		)	(14,040		)	(10,695		)	(3,345		)	(1,271		)	(9.1	)
Net revenues	155,274			153,657			124,400			29,257			1,617			1.1
Costs and Expenses:
Casino	27,291			27,016			21,350			5,666			275			1.0
Lodging	15,839			14,879			11,757			3,122			960			6.5
Food and beverage	35,270			34,406			28,658			5,748			864			2.5
Retail	1,355			1,470			1,197			273			(115		)	(7.8	)
Other	13,286			12,508			9,631			2,877			778			6.2
Marketing	6,816			4,219			3,376			843			2,597			61.6
Fee and expense reimbursements	1,719			2,530			1,598			932			(811		)	(32.1	)
General and administrative	28,068			28,707			22,318			6,389			(639		)	(2.2	)
Depreciation and amortization	23,612			28,183			17,325			10,858			(4,571		)	(16.2	)
Pre-opening	259			146			146			—			113			77.4
Impairment of intangible assets	3,000			—			—			—			3,000			100.0
Total costs and expenses	156,515			154,064			117,356			36,708			2,451			1.6
(Loss) income from operations	(1,241		)	(407		)	7,044			(7,451		)	(834		)	(204.9	)
Interest income	31			55			47			8			(24		)	(43.6	)
Interest expense	(66,483		)	(61,613		)	(46,743		)	(14,870		)	(4,870		)	(7.9	)
Loss on joint venture investment	(324		)	—			—			—			(324		)	100.0
Gain on forgiveness of debt	—			32,460			—			32,460			(32,460		)	(100.0	)
(Loss) income before income tax (benefit) expense	(68,017		)	(29,505		)	(39,652		)	10,147			(38,512		)	(130.5	)
Income tax (benefit) expense	—			141			—			141			(141		)	(100.0	)
Net (Loss) income	$	(68,017	)	$	(29,646	)	$	(39,652	)	$	10,006		$	(38,371	)	(129.4	)%

Management Fee and Expense Reimbursements - Related Party. The increase in management fee and expense reimbursements — related party for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was primarily the result of incentive fees incurred under the WG-Harmon Agreements.

~~Casino~~General ~~Revenues~~and Administrative. ~~During~~The ~~the~~decrease ~~period~~in ~~from~~general ~~March~~and 1,administrative ~~2011~~expenses tofor ~~June 15, 2012 we did not receive any revenues of~~ the ~~casino~~six atmonths ~~the~~ended ~~Hard~~June ~~Rock~~30, ~~Hotel &~~2014 ~~Casino~~was ~~Las~~primarily ~~Vegas. However,~~ the ~~Company~~result ~~has~~of ~~included~~lower ~~revenues~~non-recurring ~~earned~~expenses byassociated ~~LVHR during such period in its consolidated financial statements in accordance~~ with ~~applicable~~the ~~guidance~~timing ~~relating~~of tocertain ~~variable~~legal ~~interest entities~~matters.

~~Casino~~Depreciation ~~revenues~~and ~~for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased $1~~Amortization.9 ~~million~~The todecrease ~~$33.5~~in ~~million~~depreciation ~~when~~and ~~compared~~amortization toexpenses for the ~~same~~six ~~period~~months inended ~~2011.~~June ~~The~~30, ~~increase~~2014 ~~in casino revenues~~ was primarily ~~due~~the toresult aof ~~$1.8~~intangible ~~million~~assets orbecoming ~~15.9%~~fully ~~increase in slot revenue and a $0~~amortized.1 ~~million or 0.7% increase in table games revenue.~~

~~Slot~~Interest Expense. ~~Slot~~The ~~machine~~increase ~~revenues~~in interest expense for the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014 ~~increased~~was ~~$1.8 million to $13.0 million when compared to~~ the ~~same~~result ~~period in 2011. Slot machine handle decreased $21.8 million from $255.8 million to $234.0 million. Slot machine hold percentage increased to 5.6% from 4.4%. The number~~ of ~~slot~~an ~~machines~~increase in ~~operation~~the ~~decreased~~amount toof ~~616~~debt ~~from~~as ~~641,~~ a ~~decrease of 25 machines. The net~~ result of ~~these~~interest ~~changes~~being paid in ~~handle,~~kind ~~hold~~during ~~percentage~~2013 and ~~average~~the ~~number~~first ofsix ~~slot~~months ~~machines in operation was an increase in net win per slot machine per day to $76.97 from $64.01, an increase~~ of ~~$12~~2014.96 ~~or 20.2%.~~

Table Games. Table games revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased $0.1 million to $20.1 million when compared to the same period in 2011. Table games drop decreased $26.6 million or 14.1% to $161.2 million. Table games hold

percentage increased 1.8% to 12.4% from 10.6%. The average number of table games in operations decreased to 76 from 90 tables. The net result of these changes in drop and hold percentage was an increase in win per table game per day to $960 from $813, or 18.1%. We have historically reported table games hold percentage using the gross method, while casinos on the Las Vegas Strip report hold percentage using the net method (which reduces the table game drop by marker repayments made in the gaming pit area). For the purpose of comparison to properties on the Las Vegas Strip, our net hold percentage for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was 14.9% compared to 13.6% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. Management believes the decrease in table games drop was due to increased competition coupled with ongoing construction projects on the casino floor.

Lodging Revenues. Lodging revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased $3.0 million to $48.4 million when compared to the same period in 2011. The increase in lodging revenues was primarily due to a 4.3% increase in total occupied rooms to 350,421 from 335,868 and an increase in the average daily rate of $1.83 to $136.08 or 1.4%.

Food and Beverage Revenues. Food and beverage revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 decreased $3.2 million to $64.3 million when compared to the same period in 2011. The $3.2 million decrease in food and beverage revenues was primarily due to a decline in business volumes at the restaurants, bars, and night club partially offset by an increase in pool revenues associated with improved programing.

Retail Revenues. Retail revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 decreased $0.1 million to $2.2 million when compared to the same period in 2011.

Other Revenues. Other revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased $1.4 million to $22.3 million when compared to the same period in 2011. The increase in other revenues was primarily the result of having 17 more events during the first nine months in 2012 compared to the first nine months of 2011.

Promotional Allowances. Promotional allowances furnished to customers on a complimentary basis for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased $1.3 million or 9.1% to $15.3 million when compared to the same period in 2011. As a percentage of gross revenues, promotional allowances increased to 9.0% compared to 8.4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Casino Expenses. Casino expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased $0.3 million or 1.0% to $27.3 million when compared to the same period in 2011. The increase was primarily due to an increase in the estimated cost incurred by the Company to provide complementaries to casino customers and were partially offset by a decrease in returned markers.

Lodging Expenses. Lodging expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased $1.0 million or 6.5% to $15.8 million when compared to the same period in 2011. Lodging expenses in relation to lodging revenues decreased to 32.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012. The increase in lodging expenses was primarily due to operating cost associated with the increase in occupied rooms.

Food and Beverage Expenses. Food and beverage expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased $0.9 million or 2.5% to $35.3 million when compared to the same period in 2011. Food and beverage expenses in relation to food and beverage revenues increased to 54.8% from 51.0% in the prior period. The increase in food and beverage expense was primarily the result of increased costs associated with nightclub operations.

Retail Expenses. Retail expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 decreased $0.1 million or 7.8% to $1.4 million when compared to the same period in 2011. Retail expenses in relation to retail revenues decreased to 62.9% from 64.4%.

Other Expenses. Other expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased $0.8 million or 6.2% to $13.3 million compared to the same period in 2011. This increase was primarily due to an increase in artist fees and related production costs as a result of having 17 more concerts.

Marketing. Marketing expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased $2.6 million or 61.6% to $6.8 million when compared to the same period in 2011. Marketing in relation to gross revenues increased to 4.0% from 2.5%. The increase in marketing expenses was primarily due to an increase in advertising and personnel in an effort to drive brand awareness in our competitive market.

General and Administrative. General and administrative expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 decreased $0.6 million or 2.2% to $28.1 million when compared to the same period in 2011. General and administrative expenses in relation to

gross revenues decreased to 16.5% from 17.1%. The decrease in general and administrative was primarily due to a decrease in the assessed property taxes and a decrease in management bonuses.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 decreased $4.6 million or 16.2% to $23.6 million when compared to the same period in 2011. The decrease in depreciation and amortization expense is a result of the revaluation of the assets at the time of the Assignment.

Interest Expense. Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 increased $4.9 million or 7.9% to $66.5 million when compared to the same period in 2011. The increase in interest expense is primarily the result of an increase in PIK interest during the period. In addition, a total of $21.1 million of interest expense is a result of debt discount amortization under the Amended Facility and Second Mortgage during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $12.1 million during the seven months ended September 30, 2011.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

A description of the Company’s critical accounting policies can be found in Item 7 of its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2012~~2013.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

AsOur ofability ~~September 30,~~to ~~2012,~~service weour ~~had~~contractual ~~$15.2~~obligations ~~million~~and incommitments ~~available~~will be dependent on availability of operating cash and ~~cash~~on ~~equivalents.~~our Asfuture ofperformance, ~~September 30~~which will be affected by, ~~2012~~among other things, the status of any potential payments related to our ~~total~~Amended ~~debt~~Facility ~~was~~as ~~$904.2~~described ~~million with~~below, aprevailing ~~carrying~~economic ~~value~~conditions ofand ~~$633.1~~financial, ~~million~~business and ~~total~~other ~~members'~~factors, ~~deficit~~certain ~~was $47.4~~of ~~million~~which are beyond our control.

The Amended Facility. Onhas a maturity date of March 1, ~~2011~~2018 and provides for interest only at LIBOR plus 2.5% with a 1.5% LIBOR floor (total of 4.0% at June 30, ~~HRH~~2014). ~~Holdings~~In addition, under the ~~Mortgage~~Amended ~~Lender,~~Facility ~~Brookfield,~~supplemental ~~NRFC,~~interest is accrued at a rate sufficient to provide for the ~~Morgans~~greater ~~Parties~~of ~~and~~6.5% ~~certain~~or ~~affiliates~~LIBOR + 4.0% effective interest rate at maturity after consideration of ~~DLJMBP,~~all asprior ~~well~~payments asof ~~other~~principal ~~interested~~and ~~parties~~interest. ~~entered~~The ~~into~~rates of accrual are dependent on fluctuations in the ~~Settlement~~applicable ~~Agreement~~LIBOR ~~pursuant~~rate. The toAmended ~~which~~Facility ithas ~~was~~a ~~agreed~~provision ~~that~~whereby if the ~~membership~~cash ~~interests~~available offor ~~HRHH~~debt JVservice ~~Junior~~is ~~Mezz~~less ~~and~~than ~~HRHH~~the ~~Gaming~~current ~~Junior~~interest ~~Mezz~~due, ~~were~~the tointerest shortfall will be ~~transferred~~automatically added to the ~~Company.~~outstanding principal balance of the Amended Facility and shall thereafter accrue interest, as PIK

As part of the Assignment, the Company assumed the obligations under the Facility and entered into the Amended Facility pursuant to which the land, building and improvements, equipment, fixtures and all personal properties relating to the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino were pledged as security and collateral. See further discussion at Note 1, Company Structure.17

interest. In addition, excess cash in the cash management account will be applied to the outstanding PIK interest, supplemental interest and principal according to the terms of the Amended Facility.

The outstanding PIK interest as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 was $48.6 million and $39.8 million, respectively. The PIK interest outstanding as of March 1, 2014, in the amount of $44.3 million, became due and payable on March 1, 2014, as the operating performance of the Company did not meet a specified debt yield threshold for the twelve month period ended March 1, 2014. However, the lender entered into a Forbearance Agreement effective as of March 1, 2014, pursuant to which it agreed not to exercise any rights or remedies with respect to the PIK interest until June 2, 2014. The lender entered into a Second Amendment to the Forbearance Agreement effective as of June 2, 2014, pursuant to which it agreed not to exercise any rights or remedies with respect to the PIK interest until July 28, 2014. The lender entered into a Third Amendment to the Forbearance Agreement effective as of July 28, 2014, pursuant to which it agreed not to exercise any rights or remedies with respect to the PIK interest until August 11, 2014. The lender entered into a Fourth Amendment to the Forbearance Agreement effective as of August 11, 2014, pursuant to which it agreed not to exercise any rights or remedies with respect to the PIK interest until August 25, 2014. Currently, the Company does not have sufficient funds to satisfy a demand for the PIK interest payment on August 25, 2014. The Company is currently assessing its options to satisfy the PIK interest payment obligation, including, but not limited to, negotiating a waiver of this requirement from the lender, selling off a portion of existing collateral or attempting to obtain borrowings from other sources. If the Company is unable to restructure its indebtedness, obtain alternative financing on acceptable terms, obtain approval from the lender to use available cash reserves to satisfy a portion of this potential obligation, or a combination thereof, among other lesser remedies, the lender may declare all unpaid principal and accrued interest, totaling $987.8 million, under the Amended Facility due and payable immediately, in which case, under present circumstances, the Company would not have sufficient funds or other sources of liquidity to pay all such amounts. If this occurs, our business and results of operations would be materially adversely affected. The Company is currently in discussions with the lender but as of the date of the filing the outcome remains uncertain.

The maturity date of the Second Mortgage is March 1, 2018 and provides for an effective interest rate of 15% payable at maturity.

Liquidity Requirements

AsShort-Term ofLiquidity ~~September 30,~~Requirements. ~~2012~~Currently, wethe ~~had~~Company ~~total~~does ~~current~~not ~~assets~~have ofsufficient ~~$37.4~~funds ~~million~~to satisfy a demand for the PIK interest payment on August 25, ~~including~~2014 ~~$15.2~~and ~~million~~therefore, the Company could be in ~~available~~default ~~cash~~upon ~~and~~notification ~~cash~~by ~~equivalents~~the lender. Accordingly, the Amended Facility, supplemental interest, and ~~$23.3~~PIK ~~million~~interest ofare classified as current ~~and~~as ~~long-term~~of ~~restricted~~June 30, ~~cash~~2014. ~~reserves~~If ~~held~~prevailing ininterest ~~accordance~~rates ~~with~~or ~~certain~~other factors at the time of any restructuring of our ~~subsidiaries’~~indebtedness ~~loan~~or ~~agreements~~at ~~and~~the ~~gaming~~time ~~regulatory~~we ~~requirements.~~obtain Asborrowings offrom ~~September 30~~other sources result in higher interest rates, ~~2012~~our interest expense could increase, wewhich ~~had~~would ~~total~~harm ~~current~~our ~~liabilities~~business and results of ~~$32.3~~ ~~million~~operations.

~~Short-Term~~Except ~~Liquidity~~for ~~Requirements.~~the Weimplications described above related to the Amended Facility, we expect our liquidity requirements to consist primarily of funds necessary to pay operating expenses associated with our subsidiaries’ hotel and casino operations, interest, payment of principal, fees and expenses under certain of our subsidiaries’ loan agreements (including required deposits into reserve accounts) and capital expenditures associated with the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas. Anticipated sources of our liquidity needs include our subsidiaries’ existing working capital, cash provided by our subsidiaries’ operations and our subsidiaries’ non-restricted cash reserves. WeExcluding the potential implications of the item described above, we expect to be able to meet our short-term liquidity needs through existing working capital and cash provided by our operations. For the ~~nine~~six months ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014, the Company incurred cash interest payments of $26.18 million.

Long-Term Liquidity Requirements. Our long-term liquidity requirements include funds necessary to pay debt under the Amended Facility and Second Mortgage.

~~Our~~Cash ~~ability~~Flows to service our contractual obligations and commitments will be dependent on availability of operating cash and on our future performance, which will be affected by, among other things, prevailing economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, certain of which are beyond our control. The outstanding PIK interest as of September 30, 2013, September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was $31.7 million, $11.5 million and $8.2 million, respectively. The Amended Facility allows the Company to accrue 'payable in kind' interest ('PIK interest'), representing the difference between interest accruing under the Amended Facility and the amounts paid. The PIK interest becomes due and payable on March 1, 2014, dependent upon whether the operating performance of the Company has met a defined threshold ('debt yield threshold') for the ~~twelve~~Six ~~month~~Months ~~period~~Ended ~~ending~~June ~~March 1~~30, 2014. ~~The outstanding~~

Operating Activities. Our operating cash flows primarily consist of our operating income (excluding non-cash charges), interest paid and changes in working capital accounts such as receivables, inventories, prepaid expenses and payables. Net cash provided by operating activities amounted to $8.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014, compared to $5.9 million net cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2013. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities primarily relates to the change in working capital for the six months ended June 30, 2014.

~~PIK interest as of December 31, 2012, was $~~18.5 million and, subsequent to December 31, 2012, the outstanding PIK interest has increased to approximately $31.7 million as of September 30, 2013. We currently believe the Company will not meet the specified debt yield threshold. As of the date of this filing, we have begun to assess options, including negotiating a waiver of this requirement from the lender, seeking approval from the lender to use cash reserves to satisfy a portion of this potential obligation, selling off a portion of existing collateral, or attempting to obtain additional borrowings from other sources. If we are unable to restructure our indebtedness, find alternative financing sources on acceptable terms, or obtain approval from the lender to use our cash reserves to satisfy a portion of this potential obligation, we risk losing some or all of our property to foreclosure.

~~The~~Investing ~~Amended~~Activities. ~~Facility~~Net ~~has~~cash aused ~~maturity~~in ~~date~~investing ofactivities ~~March~~amounted 1,to ~~2018 and provides for interest only at LIBOR plus 2~~$3.~~5% with a~~ 1~~.5%~~ ~~LIBOR~~million ~~floor~~for ~~(total~~the ofsix 4%months atended ~~September~~ June 30, ~~2012). In addition~~2014, ~~under~~compared ~~the Amended Facility supplemental interest is accrued at a rate sufficient~~ to ~~provide for the greater of 6~~$1.5%9 ormillion ~~LIBOR~~net +cash 4%used ~~effective interest rate at maturity after consideration of all prior payments of principal and interest. The rates of accrual are dependent on fluctuations~~ in ~~the~~investing ~~applicable~~activities ~~LIBOR~~for ~~rate. The Amended Facility has a provision whereby if~~ the ~~cash~~six ~~available~~months ~~for~~ended ~~debt~~June ~~service is less than the current interest due~~30, ~~the~~2013. ~~interest~~The ~~shortfall~~decrease ~~will~~primarily berelates ~~automatically added~~ to ~~the~~increased ~~outstanding~~purchases ~~principal balance~~ of ~~the~~property ~~Amended Facility~~ and ~~shall~~equipment ~~thereafter~~during ~~accrue interest, as PIK interest. In addition, excess cash in~~ the ~~cash~~six ~~management~~months ~~account~~ended ~~will~~June ~~be applied to the outstanding PIK interest~~30, ~~supplemental interest and principal according to the terms of the Amended Facility~~2014.

~~The~~Financing ~~maturity~~Activities. ~~date~~Net ofcash used in financing activities amounted to $0.3 million for the ~~Second~~six ~~Mortgage~~months isended ~~March~~June 130, ~~2018~~2014, ~~and~~compared ~~provides~~to ~~for~~$0.4 anmillion ~~effective~~net ~~interest~~cash ~~rate~~used ofin ~~15%~~financing ~~payable~~activities atfor ~~maturity~~six months ended June 30, 2013.

Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2012 for the Company and HRH Holdings

Operating Activities. Our operating cash flows primarily consist of our operating income (excluding non-cash charges), interest paid and changes in working capital accounts such as receivables, inventories, prepaid expenses and payables. Net cash provided by operating activities amounted to $2.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared to $1.3 million net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Investing Activities. Net cash used in investing activities amounted to $1.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared to $15.3 million net cash used in investing activities for nine months ended September 30, 2011. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, payments were primarily incurred for ordinary course capital expenditures. The $13.3 million increase in investing activities primarily relates to the $30 million contribution to restricted cash related to the Second Mortgage for the seven month period ended March 31, 2011.

Financing Activities. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company had net cash used from financing activities of $2.6 million, as compared to $12.6 million net cash proved by financing activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The decrease in net cash provided by financing activities was primarily attributable to $13.0 million of additional borrowings and $18.6 million of equity contributions from our Second Mortgage holder during the nine months ended September 30, 2011.

Capital Expenditures, Interest Expense and Reserve Funds

The Company is obligated to maintain reserve funds for capital expenditures at the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas as determined pursuant to the Amended Facility. These capital expenditures relate primarily to the periodic replacement or refurbishment of furniture, fixtures and equipment. The Amended Facility requires the subsidiaries to deposit funds into a replacements and refurbishments reserve fund at amounts equal to three percent of the Hard Rock Hotel & Casino Las Vegas’ gross revenues and requires that the funds be set aside in restricted cash. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014, the Company had restricted cash in a working capital reserve account of $1914.94 million, and inan ~~addition~~additional $05.37 million was available in restricted cash reserves for future capital expenditures in the replacements and refurbishments reserve fund.

~~The~~Pursuant ~~Company has also funded a general reserve account and an equity/accrual subaccount, as required under the Amended Facility. In addition, pursuant~~ to gaming requirements certain of our subsidiaries maintain up to $8.0 million in reserve for their gaming operations, which in accordance with the Amended Facility is not deposited into the cash management account described above.

3119

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Our future income, cash flows and fair values relevant to financial instruments are dependent upon prevailing market interest rates. Market risk refers to the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and interest rates. The outstanding debt under the Amended Facility has a variable interest rate. We use some derivative financial instruments, primarily interest rate caps, to manage our exposure to interest rate risks related to our floating rate debt. We do not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes and only enter into contracts with major financial institutions based on their credit rating and other factors. As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014, our total outstanding variable rate debt was $~~874~~911.2 million.

~~Effective March 28, 2012, the Company has entered into two hedge agreements which cap LIBOR at 1.24025%.~~ At ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014, the LIBOR rate was 0.~~214~~151% on the total outstanding debt~~, thereby making our cap out of the money~~. Due to a LIBOR floor of 1.5% currently in place under the Amended Facility, the LIBOR rate would have to exceed the LIBOR floor for our interest expense to be affected and any decrease in interest rates would not decrease interest expense. ~~Subject~~As ~~to the cap and the LIBOR floor, as~~ of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2012~~2014, a ~~change~~hypothetical 1% increase in market rates ~~would~~above ~~only~~the ~~have~~LIBOR anfloor ~~impact~~of on1.5% to 2.5% would increase interest expense for ~~market~~the ~~rates~~next ~~between~~twelve ~~the~~months ~~LIBOR~~by ~~cap~~$9.4 million and ~~the~~a ~~LIBOR~~hypothetical ~~floor,~~2% asincrease atin ~~this~~market ~~level~~rates above the ~~interest~~LIBOR ~~rate~~floor ~~cap~~of ~~becomes~~1.5% ~~“in~~to ~~the~~3.5% ~~money”~~would ~~and~~increase ~~will~~interest atexpense ~~that~~for ~~point~~the ~~begin~~next totwelve ~~reduce~~months ~~the~~by ~~Company’s~~$18.8 ~~interest expense~~million. Due to the LIBOR floor, a decrease in market interest rates would not decrease our annual interest expense.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management, under the supervision and with the participation of our principal executive and financial officers, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as ofdefined ~~September 30, 2012. Based on that evaluation, management has identified material weaknesses~~ in ~~our~~Rules ~~internal~~13a-15(e) ~~control~~and ~~over~~15d-15(e) ~~financial~~under ~~reporting,~~the ~~which~~Securities isExchange anAct ~~integral component~~ of ~~our disclosure controls and procedures~~1934, as ~~described~~amended) ~~below. As a result~~ of ~~those material weaknesses~~June 30, ~~our~~2014. ~~principal~~Based ~~executive~~on ~~and~~that ~~financial~~evaluation, ~~officers~~management ~~have~~has concluded that, as of ~~September~~such 30date, ~~2012,~~ our disclosure controls and procedures were ~~not~~ effective.

~~Management’s~~Changes ~~Report~~in on Internal Control ~~over~~Over Financial Reporting during the Quarter Ended June 30, 2014

~~Management~~There ishas ~~responsible~~been ~~for~~no ~~establishing~~change ~~and~~in ~~maintaining~~our ~~adequate~~ internal control over financial reporting~~. Internal~~ ~~control~~during ~~over~~our ~~financial~~most ~~reporting~~recent isfiscal ~~defined~~quarter inthat ~~Rules~~has ~~13a-15(f)~~materially ~~and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act as a process designed by~~affected, or ~~under~~is ~~the~~reasonably ~~supervision~~likely ~~of,~~to ~~the~~materially ~~Company’s principal executive and financial officers and effectuated by the Company’s board of directors~~affect, ~~management~~our ~~and~~internal ~~other~~control ~~personnel~~over ~~to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of~~ financial reporting ~~and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U~~.~~S. generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:~~

• pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Company;

• provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made in accordance with authorization of management and directors of the Company; and

• provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

The Company’s management has conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of the Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation, we concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of September 30, 2012, because of material weaknesses in internal controls as described below.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statement will not be prevented, or detected and corrected on a timely basis. We identified the following deficiencies that constituted individually, or in the aggregate, material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting at September 30, 2012:

• We identified errors in the presentation of the statement of cash flows resulting in a restatement of the 2011 consolidated statement of cash flows. This represents a deficiency in the operating effectiveness of our internal controls over the preparation and review of the consolidated statement of cash flows.

• Deficiencies in the operating effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls related to significant and unusual contracts and transactions such as the accounting and disclosure for business acquisitions.

Remediation Plans for Material Weakness in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Company hired a new Chief Financial Officer in the third quarter of 2012 and additional financial accounting resources in 2013 to remediate the material weaknesses describe above. The Company has developed a plan to file the delinquent financial reports and to become current with its filings in 2014. This plan includes improvements in the design and effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting during the Quarter Ended September 30, 2012

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred in the three months ended September 30, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

For discussions of legal proceedings, refer to Note 1211, “Commitments and Contingencies,” to our condensed consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this Quarter Report on Form 10-Q.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the risks discussed in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2012~~2013. These risks and uncertainties have the potential to materially affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, projected results and future prospects. We do not believe that there have been any material changes to the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2012~~2013.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information

~~None~~Not applicable.

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit 31(a), (b) Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications

Exhibit 32(a), (b) 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 Certifications

Exhibit 101 Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T

3421

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	BREF HR, LLC, by its manager, BREF HR Management, LLC
Date: December 20, 2013	By:	/s/ Andrea Balkan
Date: August 12, 2014	By:	/s/ Andrea Balkan
		Andrea Balkan
		Authorized Representative

35Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.



Signature	Title	Date
/s/ William Warner	Principal Executive Officer	August 12, 2014
William Warner

/s/ Chad Konrad	Principal Financial Officer	August 12, 2014
Chad Konrad

Filing Compare · BREF HR, LLC