UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(MARK ONE)

☒ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~January~~ July 31, 2014

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to ________

Commission File No. 333-189630

EMERALD ISLE EXPLORATION LTD.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada		90-0961033
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

~~1218 Purtov~~3520 ~~Street~~Woodland Drive

Kodiak, Alaska 99615

(Address of principal executive offices, zip code)

(907) 539-2222

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (check one):

Large ~~accelerated~~Accelerated ~~filer~~Filer ☐ Accelerated ~~filer~~Filer ☐ Non-~~accelerated~~Accelerated ~~filer~~Filer ☐ Smaller reporting company ☒ ~~(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)~~

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act): Yes ☒ No ☐

APPLICABLE ONLY TO ISSUERS INVOLVED IN BANKRUPTCY

PROCEEDINGS DURING THE PRECEDING FIVE YEARS:

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Sections 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes ☐ No ☐

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

As of ~~March~~ 11September 09, 2014, there were 4,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.00001 par value per share, outstanding.

EMERALD ISLE EXPLORATION LTD.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

FOR THE PERIOD ENDED ~~JANUARY~~JULY 31, 2014

INDEX

Index		Page
Part I. Financial Information
Item 1.	Financial Statements.	4
	Balance Sheets as of January 31, 2014 (Unaudited) and April 30, 2013.	F-1
	Balance Sheets as of July 31, 2014 (Unaudited) and April 30, 2014.	F-1
	Statement of Operations for the three month period ended January 31, 2014, and the period from inception (November 7, 2012) to January 31, 2014, the nine month period ended January 31, 2014 and for the period from inception (November 7, 2012) to January 31, 2014 (unaudited)	F-2
	Statement of Operations for the three month period ended July 31, 2014 and 2013, and the period from inception (November 7, 2012) to July 31, 2014 (unaudited)	F-2
	Statements of Cash Flows for the nine month period ended January 31, 2014 and for the period from inception (November 7, 2012) to January 31, 2013 and for the period from inception (November 7, 2012) to January 31, 2014 (unaudited).	F-3
	Statements of Cash Flows for the three month period ended July 31, 2014 and 2013, and for the period from inception (November 7, 2012) to July 31, 2014 (unaudited).	F-3
	Statement of Changes in Stockholder’s Equity (Deficit) from Inception (November 7, 2012) to January 31, 2014 (unaudited)	F-4
	Statement of Changes in Stockholder’s Equity (Deficit) from Inception (November 7, 2012) to July 31, 2014 (unaudited)	F-4
	Notes to Financial Statements (unaudited).	F-5
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	5
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	1110
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures.	1110
Part II. Other Information
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.	1210
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.	1210
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.	1210
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities.	1210
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures.	1211
Item 5.	Other Information.	1211
Item 6.	Exhibits.	1211
Signatures		1312

-2-

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), contains “forward-looking statements,” as defined in the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “will”, “should”, “could”, “expects”, “plans”, “intends”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential” or “continue” or the negative of such terms and other comparable terminology. These forward-looking statements include, without limitation, statements about our market opportunity, our strategies, competition, expected activities and expenditures as we pursue our business plan, and the adequacy of our available cash resources. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Actual results may differ materially from the predictions discussed in these forward-looking statements. The economic environment within which we operate could materially affect our actual results. Additional factors that could materially affect these forward-looking statements and/or predictions include, among other things: the volatility of minerals prices, the possibility that exploration efforts will not yield economically recoverable quantities of minerals, accidents and other risks associated with mineral exploration and development operations, the risk that the Company will encounter unanticipated geological factors, the Company’s need for and ability to obtain additional financing, the possibility that the Company may not be able to secure permitting and other governmental clearances necessary to carry out the Company’s exploration and development plans, other factors over which we have little or no control; and other factors discussed in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Our management has included projections and estimates in this Form 10-Q, which are based primarily on management’s experience in the industry, assessments of our results of operations, discussions and negotiations with third parties and a review of information filed by our competitors with the SEC or otherwise publicly available. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. We disclaim any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

-3-

(table of contents)

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

~~January~~ July 31, 2014

(unaudited)

	Index
Balance Sheets	F-1
Balance Sheets as at July 31, 2014 and April 30, 2014	F-1
Statements of Operations	F-2
Statements of Operations for the three month period ended July 31, 2014 and 2013 and the period from inception (November 7, 2012) through July 31, 2014	F-2
Statements of Cash Flows	F-3
Statements of Cash Flows for the three month period ended July 31, 2014 and 2013 and the period from inception (November 7, 2012) through July 31, 2014	F-3
Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)	F-4
Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit from inception on November 7, 2012) through July 31, 2014	F-4
Notes to the Financial Statements	F-5

-4-

(table of contents)

Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Balance Sheets

~~January~~ July 31, 2014 and April 30, ~~2013~~2014

(unaudited)

	January 31, 2014			April 30, 2013
	July 31, 2014			April 30, 2014
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash	$	127,~~729~~243		$	729,~~931~~788
Total Current Assets		127,~~729~~243			729,~~931~~788
Total Assets	$	127,~~729~~243		$	729,~~931~~788
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable	$	~~200~~1,902		$	—
Due to Directors		1516,~~900~~150			16,~~000~~150
Total Liabilities		1618,~~100~~052			16,~~000~~150
Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
Common Stock (75,000,000 shares authorized, par value 0.00001, 4,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at January 31, 2014 and April 30, 2013)		40			40
Additional paid-in capital		~~878~~1,512			~~(40~~1,190	)
Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage		(15,289	)		(8,069	)
Stock Payable		35,000			35,000
Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)		(14,371	)		(8,069	)
Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage		(27,361	)		(22,592	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)	$	1,729		$	7,931
Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)		9,191			13,638
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)	$	27,243		$	29,788

(The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of These Financial Statements)

F-1

(table of contents)

Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Statements of Operations

For the three month period ended ~~January~~ July 31, 2014, ~~the~~and ~~period from inception (November 7, 2012)~~2013

~~to January~~and ~~31,~~for ~~2014,~~ the ~~nine month~~ period ~~ended~~from ~~January~~inception 31(November 7, ~~2014~~2012) ~~and~~to ~~for~~July ~~the~~31, ~~period from inception~~2014

(November 7, 2012) to January 31, 2014

(unaudited)

	Three Month Period Ended January 31, 2014			Three Month Period Ended January 31, 2013			Nine Month Period Ended January 31, 2014			Inception November 7, 2012 to January 31, 2014
	Three Month Period Ended July 31, 2014			Three Month Period Ended July 31, 2013			Inception November 7, 2012 to July 31, 2014
Revenue	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Cost of Goods Sold	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Gross Profit	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Operating Expenses
Legal and accounting	$	12,500		$	—1,250		$	420,~~300~~710		$	~~11,300~~
Consulting Services		—			—1,000			1,000			~~1,000~~
General and administrative		~~512~~1,947			—46			~~600~~2,661			~~669~~
Office Supplies		20—			—113			~~402~~438			~~402~~
Impairment of Mineral Claims		—			—			—1,000			~~1,000~~
Total Operating Expenses		24,~~032~~447			—2,409			625,~~302~~809			~~14,371~~
Imputed Interest		~~317~~322			—283			~~918~~1,552			~~918~~
Net Loss	$	(24,~~349~~769	)	$	—(2,692	)	$	(727,~~220~~361	)	$	~~(15,289~~	)
Net Loss Per Common Share – Basic and Diluted		(0.00	)		(0.00	)		~~(0.00~~	)
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding		4,000,000			4,000,000			~~4,000,000~~

(The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of These Financial Statements)

F-2

(table of contents)

Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Statements of Cash Flows

For the ~~Nine~~three ~~Month~~month ~~Period~~period ~~Ended~~ended ~~January~~ July 31, 2014 and 2013

~~For~~ and for the ~~Period~~period from ~~Inception~~inception (November 7, 2012) to ~~January~~July 31, ~~2013 and~~2014

For the Period from Inception (November 7, 2012) to January 31, 2014

(unaudited)

	Nine Month Period Ended January 31, 2014			Inception (November 7, 2012) to January 31, 2013			Inception (November 7, 2012) to January 31, 2014
	Three Month Period Ended July 31, 2014			Three Month Period Ended July 31, 2013			Inception (November 7, 2012) to July 31, 2014
Operating Activities
Net loss	$	(74,~~220~~769	)	$	—(2,692	)	$	(1527,~~289~~361	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used in operating activities:
Impairment of mineral claims		—			—			1,000
Imputed interest		~~918~~322			—283			~~918~~1,552
Changes in Operating Assets and Liabilities:
Accounts payable		~~200~~1,902			~~1,000~~—			~~200~~1,902
Net Cash Provided by (used by) Operating Activities		(62,~~102~~545	)		1(2,~~000~~409	)		(1322,~~171~~907	)
Investing Activities
Purchase of mining claims		—			~~(1,000~~—	)		(1,000	)
Net cash used by investing activities		—			~~(1,000~~—	)		(1,000	)
Financing Activities
Borrowing on debt-related party		—			—			16,~~000~~250
Repayment on debt related party		~~(100~~—	)		—			(100	)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(100	)		—			15,900
Proceeds from sale of stock		—			—			35,000
Increase (Decrease) in Cash		(6,202	)		—			1,729
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		—			—			51,150
Cash - Beginning of Period		7,931			—			—
Increase (Decrease) in Cash		(2,545	)		(2,409	)		27,243
Cash - End of Period	$	1,729		$	—		$	1,729
Cash - Beginning of Period		29,788			7,931			—
Cash - End of Period	$	27,243		$	5,522		$	27,243
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information Cash paid during the period for:
Interest		—			—			—
Income taxes		—						—
Non-cash Activities
Issuance of common stock to founder		—		$	40—		$	40

(The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of These Financial Statements)

F-3

(table of contents)

Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

From Inception, November 7, 2012 to ~~January~~ July 31, 2014

(unaudited)

	Common Stock				Additional Paid-in			~~Deficit~~Common ~~Accumulated During the Exploration~~Stock			Deficit Accumulated During the Exploration
	Shares		Amount		Capital			~~Stage~~Subscribed			~~Total~~Stage			Total
Balance at November 7, 2012		—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Issuance of common stock to founders		4,000,000		40		(40	)		—			—			—
Net loss		—		—		—			~~(8,069~~—	)		(8,069	)		(8,069	)
Balances at April 30, 2013		4,000,000		40		(40	)		~~(8,069~~—	)		(8,069	)		(8,069	)
Imputed interest		—		—		918			—			918
Common Stock Subscribed		—		—		—			35,000			—			35,000
Net loss		—		—		—			(7,220	)		(7,220	)
Imputed interest		—		—		1,230			—			—			1,230
Balances at January 31, 2014		4,000,000	$	40	$	878			(15,289	)		(14,371	)
Net loss		—		—		—			—			(14,523	)		(14,523	)
Balances at April 30, 2014		4,000,000	$	40	$	1,190		$	35,000		$	(22,592	)	$	13,638
Common Stock Subscribed		—		—		—			—			—			—
Imputed interest		—		—		322			—			—			322
Net loss		—		—		—			—			(4,769	)		(4,769	)
Balances at July 31, 2014		4,000,000	$	40	$	1,512		$	35,000		$	(27,361	)	$	9,191

(The Accompanying Notes are an Integral Part of These Financial Statements)

F-4

(table of contents)

Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

(unaudited)

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND HISTORY - The Company was incorporated on November 7, 2012 in the State of Nevada. The Company is an exploration stage corporation. An exploration stage corporation is one engaged in the search for mineral deposits or reserves which are not in either the development or production stage. The Company intends to explore for gold on its mining property.

The Company does not have any revenues and has incurred losses since inception. Currently, the Company has no operations, has been issued a going concern opinion and relies upon the sale of our securities and loans from its sole officer and director to fund operations.

GOING CONCERN - These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd. will continue to meet its obligations and continue its operations for the next fiscal year. Realization value may be substantially different from carrying values as shown and these financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd. be unable to continue as a going concern. As at ~~January~~July 31, 2014 Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd. has a working capital deficiency, has not generated revenues and has accumulated losses of $1527,~~289~~361 since inception. The continuation of Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd. as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its shareholders, the ability of Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd. to obtain necessary equity financing to continue operations, and the attainment of profitable operations. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd.’s ability to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

BASIS OF PRESENTATION -These financial statements and related notes are presented in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and are expressed in U.S. dollars. The Company’s fiscal year-end is April 30.

USE OF ESTIMATES - The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net revenue and expenses in the reporting period. We regularly evaluate our estimates and assumptions related to the useful life and recoverability of long-lived assets, stock-based compensation and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. We base our estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by us July differ materially and adversely from our estimates. To the extent there are material differences between our estimates and the actual results, our future results of operations will be affected.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with original maturities of three months or less when acquired, to be cash equivalents. We had no cash equivalents at ~~January~~July 31, 2014 or April 30, ~~2013~~2014.

EXPLORATION STAGE ENTITY – The Company complies with FASB guidelines for its description as aan exploration stage company.

F-5

(table of contents)

Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

(unaudited)

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES – Continued

IMPAIRMENT POLICY – In 2013, the Company paid $1,000 for the mining project. At April 30, 2013, the Company did an assessment of whether this payment would meet the characteristics required to record it as an asset at year-end and determined that an impairment charge of $1,000 should be reflected as of April 30, 2013 because the Company could not substantiate that there would be a future economic benefit arising from this payment.

IMPUTED INTEREST – The Company calculates imputed interest expense at an interest rate of 8% (2013: 8%) per annum. Interest expense for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~January~~July 31, 2014 was $~~918~~322 (~~January~~April 3130, ~~2013~~2014: $01,230)

INCOME TAXES - The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions issued by the FASB which requires recognition of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company computes tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefit of net operating losses has not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.

LOSS PER COMMON SHARE - The Company reports net loss per share in accordance with provisions of the FASB. The provisions require dual presentation of basic and diluted loss per share. Basic net loss per share excludes the impact of common stock equivalents. Diluted net loss per share utilizes the average market price per share when applying the treasury stock method in determining common stock equivalents. As of ~~January~~July 31, 2014 and April 30, ~~2013~~2014 there were no common stock equivalents outstanding.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS - Pursuant to ASC No. 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, the Company is required to estimate the fair value of all financial instruments included on its balance sheet as of ~~January~~July 31, 2014 and April 30, ~~2013~~2014. The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash. The Company considers the carrying value of such amounts in the financial statements to approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS - In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to:

Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and

Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense.

F-6

(table of contents)

Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

(unaudited)

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES - Continued

The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In ~~January~~ ~~2013~~June 2014, the ~~FASB~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. ~~2013~~2014-0112, ~~Balance~~Compensation ~~Sheet~~– Stock Compensation (Topic ~~210~~718): ~~Clarifying~~Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the ~~Scope~~Terms of ~~Disclosures~~an ~~about~~Award ~~Offsetting~~Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. The ~~Assets~~new ~~and~~guidance ~~Liabilities,~~requires ~~which~~that ~~clarifies~~share-based ~~which~~compensation ~~instruments~~that ~~and~~require ~~transactions~~a ~~are~~specific ~~subject~~performance target to be achieved in order for employees to become eligible to vest in the ~~offsetting~~awards ~~disclosure~~and ~~requirements~~that could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period be ~~originally~~treated ~~established~~as bya ~~ASU~~performance ~~2011-11~~condition. ~~The~~As ~~new~~such, ~~ASU~~the ~~addresses~~performance ~~preparer~~target ~~concerns~~should ~~that~~not be reflected in estimating the ~~scope~~grant-date fair value of the ~~disclosure~~award. ~~requirements~~Compensation ~~under ASU~~costs ~~2011-11~~should ~~was~~be ~~overly~~recognized ~~broad~~in ~~and~~the ~~imposed~~period ~~unintended~~in ~~costs~~which it becomes probable that ~~were~~the ~~not~~performance ~~commensurate~~target ~~with~~will be ~~estimated~~achieved ~~benefits~~and should represent the compensation cost attributable to ~~financial~~the ~~statement~~period(s) for which the requisite service has already ~~users~~been rendered. InIf ~~choosing~~the toperformance ~~narrow~~target becomes probable of being achieved before the ~~scope~~end of the ~~offsetting~~requisite ~~disclosures~~service period, the remaining ~~Board~~unrecognized ~~determined~~compensation ~~that~~cost itshould ~~could~~be ~~make~~recognized ~~them~~prospectively ~~more~~over ~~operable~~the remaining requisite service period. The total ~~and~~amount of compensation cost ~~effective~~recognized ~~for~~during ~~preparers~~and ~~while~~after ~~still~~the ~~giving~~requisite ~~financial~~service ~~statement~~period ~~users~~should ~~sufficient~~reflect ~~information~~the number of awards that are expected to ~~analyze~~vest ~~the~~and ~~most~~should ~~significant~~be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the ~~presentation~~employee ~~differences~~can ~~between~~cease ~~financial~~rendering ~~statements~~service ~~prepared~~and still be eligible to vest in ~~accordance~~the ~~with~~award Uif the performance target is achieved.S. ~~GAAP~~This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those ~~prepared~~years ~~under~~beginning ~~IFRSs~~after December 15, 2015. ~~Like~~Early adoption ~~ASU~~is ~~2011-11,~~permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this ~~update~~Update ~~will~~either be(a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective ~~for~~date ~~fiscal~~or ~~periods~~(b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning ~~on,~~of orthe earliest ~~after~~annual ~~January~~period 1,presented ~~2013~~in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The adoption of ASU ~~2013~~ 2014-0112 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In ~~October~~ ~~2012~~June 2014, the FASB issued ~~Accounting~~ASU ~~Standards~~No. ~~Update~~2014-10: ~~ASU~~Development Stage ~~2012-04~~Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, ~~“Technical~~Including ~~Corrections~~an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation , to improve financial reporting by reducing the cost and ~~Improvements”~~complexity associated with the incremental reporting requirements of development stage entities. The amendments in this update remove all incremental financial ~~Accounting~~reporting ~~Standards~~requirements ~~Update~~from NoU.S. ~~2012-04~~GAAP for development stage entities, thereby improving financial reporting by eliminating the cost and complexity associated with providing that information. The amendments in this ~~update~~Update ~~cover~~also aeliminate ~~wide~~an ~~range~~exception ofprovided to ~~Topics~~development stage entities in ~~the~~Topic ~~Accounting~~810, ~~Standards~~Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the ~~Codification~~basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. ~~These~~The amendments ~~include~~to ~~technical~~eliminate ~~corrections~~that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and ~~improvements~~improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the ~~Accounting~~application ~~Standards~~of ~~Codification~~the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and ~~conforming~~disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest ~~amendments~~in ~~related~~an toentity ~~fair~~in ~~value~~the ~~measurements~~development stage. The amendments inrelated ~~this~~to ~~update~~the ~~will~~elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public companies, those amendments are effective for ~~fiscal~~annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, ~~2012~~2014, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU ~~2012~~2014-0410 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In ~~August~~ ~~2012~~July 2013, ~~the~~ FASB issued ASU ~~2012~~No. 2013-0311, ~~“Technical~~"Presentation of ~~Amendments~~an ~~and~~Unrecognized ~~Corrections~~Tax toBenefit ~~SEC~~When ~~Sections:~~a ~~Amendments~~Net toOperating ~~SEC~~Loss ~~Paragraphs Pursuant~~Carryforward, toa ~~SEC~~Similar ~~Staff~~Tax ~~Accounting~~Loss, ~~Bulletin~~or ~~(SAB)~~a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists." The provisions of ASU No. ~~114,~~2013-11 ~~Technical~~require ~~Amendments~~an ~~Pursuant~~entity to ~~SEC~~present ~~Release~~an ~~No.~~unrecognized ~~33-9250~~tax benefit, ~~and~~or ~~Corrections~~portion thereof, in the statement ~~Related~~of financial position as a reduction to ~~FASB~~a ~~Accounting~~deferred ~~Standards~~tax ~~Update~~asset ~~2010-22~~for ~~(SEC~~a ~~Update)”~~net inoperating ~~Accounting~~loss ~~Standards~~carryforward ~~Update~~or a tax credit carryforward, with certain exceptions related to availability. ASU No. ~~2012~~2013-~~03.~~11 ~~This~~is ~~update amends~~effective ~~various~~for ~~SEC~~interim ~~paragraphs~~and ~~pursuant~~annual toreporting ~~the~~periods ~~issuance~~beginning after ofDecember ~~SAB~~15, No2013. ~~114.~~ The adoption of ASU ~~2012~~No. 2013-0311 is not expected to have a material impact on ~~our~~the ~~financial~~Company's ~~position~~Consolidated Financial ~~or results of operations~~Statements.

In ~~July~~ ~~2012~~February 2013, the ~~FASB~~Financial ~~issued~~Accounting Standards ~~ASU~~Board ~~2012-02, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other~~ (~~Topic 350~~FASB): ~~Testing~~issued ~~Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment” in~~ Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. ~~2012~~2013-02~~. This update amends ASU 2011-08~~, ~~Intangibles~~Comprehensive ~~– Goodwill~~Income ~~and Other~~ (Topic ~~350~~220): ~~Testing~~Reporting ~~Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment and permits an entity first to assess~~of ~~qualitative~~Amounts ~~factors~~Reclassified toOut ~~determine~~of ~~whether~~Accumulated itOther isComprehensive ~~more~~Income, ~~likely than not that an indefinite-lived intangible asset is impaired as a basis for determining whether it is necessary~~ to ~~perform~~improve the ~~quantitative~~transparency ~~impairment~~of ~~test~~reporting inthese ~~accordance with Subtopic 350-30,~~reclassifications. ~~Intangibles - Goodwill and~~ Other -comprehensive ~~General~~income ~~Intangibles~~includes ~~Other~~gains ~~than~~and ~~Goodwill.~~losses ~~The~~that ~~amendments~~ are ~~effective~~initially ~~for~~excluded ~~annual~~from ~~and interim~~net ~~impairment~~income ~~tests performed~~ for ~~fiscal~~an ~~years~~accounting ~~beginning after September 15, 2012~~period. ~~Early adoption is permitted, including~~Those ~~for~~gains ~~annual~~ and ~~interim~~losses ~~impairment~~are ~~tests~~later ~~performed~~reclassified asout of aaccumulated ~~date~~other ~~before~~comprehensive ~~July~~income ~~27,~~into ~~2012,~~net ifincome. aThe ~~public~~amendments ~~entity’s~~in ~~financial~~the ~~statements~~ASU ~~for~~do ~~the~~not ~~most~~change ~~recent~~the ~~annual~~current orrequirements ~~interim~~for ~~period~~reporting ~~have~~net ~~not~~income ~~yet~~or ~~been~~other ~~issued~~comprehensive ~~or,~~income ~~for~~in ~~Emerald~~financial ~~Isle~~statements. ~~Exploration~~All ~~Ltd.~~of ~~nonpublic~~the ~~entities,~~information ~~have~~that ~~not~~this ~~yet~~ASU ~~been~~requires ~~made~~already ~~available~~is ~~for~~required ~~issuance.~~to ~~The~~be ~~adoption~~disclosed ofelsewhere ~~ASU~~in ~~2012-02~~the ~~has~~financial ~~not~~statements ~~had~~under aU.S. ~~material~~GAAP. ~~impact~~The new onamendments ~~our~~will ~~financial position~~require oran ~~results~~organization ~~of operations.~~to:

F-7

(table of contents)

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

F-8

(table of contents)

Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

(unaudited)

NOTE 3 -INCOME TAXES

Deferred income taxes arise from temporary differences resulting from income and expense items reported for financial accounting and tax purposes in different periods. Deferred taxes are classified as current or non-current, depending on the classification of assets and liabilities to which they relate. Deferred taxes arising from temporary differences that are not related to an asset or liability are classified as current or non-current depending on the periods in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. The ~~company~~ Company does not have any uncertain tax positions.

The Company currently has net operating loss carryforwards aggregating $1324,~~371~~809 (~~2013~~2014: $720,~~069~~362), which expire through 2033. The deferred tax asset related to the carryforwards has been fully reserved.

The Company has deferred income tax assets, which have been fully reserved, as follows as of ~~January~~July 31, 2014 and April 30, ~~2013~~2014:

	January 31, 2014			April 30, 2013
	July 31, 2014			April 30, 2014
Deferred tax assets	$	48,~~680~~683		$	27,~~474~~127
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets		(48,~~680~~683	)		(27,~~474~~127	)
Net deferred tax assets	$	—		$	—

NOTE 4 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company adopted ASC No. 820-10 (ASC 820-10), Fair Value Measurements. ASC 820-10 relates to financial assets and financial liabilities.

ASC 820-10 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of this standard apply to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and are to be applied prospectively with limited exceptions.

ASC 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. This standard is now the single source in GAAP for the definition of fair value, except for the fair value of leased property as defined in SFAS 13. ASC 820-10 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions, about market participant assumptions, that are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under ASC 820-10 are described below:

F-89

(table of contents)

Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

(unaudited)

NOTE 4 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS- Continued

•

Level 1

Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

•

Level 2

Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3

Inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable. These inputs rely on management’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. (The unobservable inputs are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances and July include the Company’s own data.)

The following presents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for those assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of ~~January~~July 31, 2014 and April 30, ~~2013~~2014:

Level 1: None

Level 2: None

Level 3: None

Total Gain (Losses): None

NOTE 5 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

A director has advanced funds to us for our legal, audit, filing fees, general office administration and cash needs. As of ~~January~~ July 31, 2014, the director has advanced a total of $16,~~000~~150 (~~2013~~2014: $16,~~000~~150). ~~During the nine months ended January 31, 2014, $100 was repaid to the related party.~~ These advanced funds are due on demand and have no stated interest rate. Imputed interest of ~~$918~~ $322 was recorded during the period ended ~~January~~July 31, 2014.

NOTE 6 - COMMON STOCK

4,000,000 common shares of Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd. were issued on November 7, 2012 to the director of the ~~company~~Company as founders shares. Imputed interest of $~~918~~ 1,552 was recorded as donated capital.

On March 20, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement to sell 1,000,000 common shares for total proceeds of $35,000. The shares have yet to be issued and are carried as common stock payable as of July 31, 2014.

As of July 31, 2014, Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd. has 4,000,000 common shares issued and outstanding.

NOTE 7 – MINING CLAIM

On December 1, 2012, we entered into an Agreement with Beowulf Properties Corp. whereby, for a purchase price of $1,000, we purchased two mining claims, Gold Eagle #1 and Gold Eagle #2 (collectively, the “Gold Eagle Mine Property”), located in central Arizona approximately 25 miles east of Prescott, Arizona and two (2) miles northeast from the town of Cherry, Arizona. We intend to conduct exploratory activities on the claims and if feasible, develop the Gold Eagle Mine Property.

The Golden Eagle Mine Property is comprised of two Federal unpatented (BLM) Lode mineral claims. The Property is 100% owned (without any underlying royalties or obligations) by Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd. Further claim information is provided in the table below:

F-910

(table of contents)

Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

(unaudited)

NOTE 7 – MINING CLAIM – Continued

Claim Name	Twp/Rge/Sec	BLM AMC Number	County Recordation Information	Claim Size
Gold Eagle #1	14N/3E/Sec 15	AMC#406042	Bk-4793 – pg 373	20.66 acres

Gold Eagle #2	14N/3E/Sec 15	AMC#406043	Bk-4793 – pg 374	20.66 acres

Total				41.32 acres

Property boundaries of the federal unpatented mining claim is located using GPS and marked with a 2“x2“x5’ wooden stake in accordance with federal and state regulations and guidelines.

The claim dimensions, of each claim, is recorded as 1,500 feet by 600 feet, the maximum dimensions allowed for lode claims under the General Mining Laws of the United States of America, United States Code (Titles 30 and 43), as amended. The claims are located within section 15 of T14N, R3E.

The assessment obligations for the claim to the U.S. Department of the Interior – Bureau of Land Management are current for the ~~2013-~~2014-2015 year. A payment to the BLM of $280.00 must be paid on or before September 1 of each year to maintain the two claims in good standing.

There is no minimum requirement for exploration work expenditures within the project.

The Company has recognized an impairment loss of $1,000 for the Property during the year ended April 30, 2013.

NOTE 8 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company had no reportable subsequent events after ~~January~~ July 31, 2014 through the date the financial statements were issued.

F-1011

~~ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S~~(table ~~DISCUSSION~~of ~~AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.~~contents)

~~The following~~ITEM ~~information should be read in conjunction with (i) the financial statements of Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd~~2., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and exploration-stage company, and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q together with (ii) the more detailed business information and the April 30, 2013 audited financial statements, January 31, 2014 unaudited financial statements, and related notes included in the CompanyMANAGEMENT’~~s Form~~ S~~-1,~~ asDISCUSSION ~~amended~~AND ~~(File~~ANALYSIS ~~No.~~OF ~~333-189630; the~~FINANCIAL ~~“Form~~CONDITION ~~S-1”),~~AND asRESULTS ~~filed~~OF ~~with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on December 13, 2013 and declared effective by the SEC on December 20, 2013~~OPERATIONS. ~~Statements in this section and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q that are not statements of historical or current fact constitute “forward-looking” statements~~

~~OVERVIEW~~The following information should be read in conjunction with (i) the financial statements of Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), and exploration-stage company, and the notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Form 10-Q together with (ii) the more detailed business information and the April 30, 2014 audited financial statements and related notes included in the Company’s Form 10-K, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on July 29, 2014. Statements in this section and elsewhere in this Form 10-Q that are not statements of historical or current fact constitute “forward-looking” statements

~~The Company was incorporated in the State of Nevada on November 7, 2012 and established a fiscal year end of April 30. It is an exploration-stage company.~~OVERVIEW

~~Going~~The Company was incorporated in the ~~Concern~~State of Nevada on November 7, 2012 and established a fiscal year end of April 30. It is an exploration-stage company.

~~GOING CONCERN~~Going - These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd. will continue to meet its obligations and continue its operations for the next fiscal year. Realization value may be substantially different from carrying values as shown and these financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd be unable to continue as a going concern. For the nine months period ended January 31, 2014 Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd. has a working capital deficiency, has not generated revenues and has accumulated losses of $7,220. Our net loss from November 7, 2012 (inception) to January 31, 2014 was $15,289. The continuation of Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd. as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its shareholders, the ability of Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd. to obtain necessary equity financing to continue operations, and the attainment of profitable operations. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd. ability to continue as a going concern.Concern

5GOING CONCERN - These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd. will continue to meet its obligations and continue its operations for the next fiscal year. Realization value may be substantially different from carrying values as shown and these financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd be unable to continue as a going concern. For the three months period ended July, 31, 2014 Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd. has a working capital deficiency, has not generated revenues and has accumulated losses of $4,769. Our net loss from November 7, 2012 (inception) to July, 31, 2014 was $27,361 The continuation of Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd. as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its shareholders, the ability of Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd. to obtain necessary equity financing to continue operations, and the attainment of profitable operations. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd. ability to continue as a going concern.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”). The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates based on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We have identified the policies below as critical to our business operations and to the understanding of our financial results:

USE OF ESTIMATES - The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of net revenue and expenses in the reporting period. We regularly evaluate our estimates and assumptions related to the useful life and recoverability of long-lived assets, stock-based compensation and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. We base our estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by us for April 30 differ materially and adversely from our estimates. To the extent there are material differences between our estimates and the actual results, our future results of operations will be affected.

EXPLORATION STAGE ENTITY – The Company complies with FASB guidelines for its description as an exploration stage company.

~~IMPUTED INTEREST~~(table ~~– The Company calculates imputed interest expense at an interest rate~~ of ~~8% (2013: 8%~~contents) ~~per annum. Interest expense for the nine months ended January 31, 2014 was $918 (January 31, 2013: $0)~~

~~INCOME TAXES~~IMPAIRMENT ~~- The~~POLICY ~~Company~~– ~~accounts~~In ~~for~~2013, ~~income taxes under~~ the ~~provisions issued by the FASB which requires recognition of~~ ~~deferred~~Company ~~tax~~paid ~~liabilities~~$1,000 ~~and assets~~ for the ~~expected~~mining ~~future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statements or tax returns~~project. At ~~Under~~April ~~this~~30, ~~method~~2013, ~~deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on~~ the ~~difference between~~Company ~~the~~did ~~financial~~an ~~statement~~assessment ~~and tax bases~~ of ~~assets~~whether ~~and~~this ~~liabilities~~payment would ~~using~~meet ~~enacted tax rates in effect for~~ the ~~year~~characteristics inrequired ~~which the differences are expected~~ to ~~reverse.~~record ~~The~~it ~~Company~~as ~~computes~~an ~~tax~~ asset ~~benefits~~at ~~for~~year-end ~~net~~and ~~operating~~determined ~~losses~~that ~~carried~~an ~~forward.~~impairment ~~The potential~~charge ~~benefit~~ of ~~net~~$1,000 should ~~operating~~be ~~losses~~reflected ~~has~~as ~~not~~of ~~been~~April ~~recognized~~30, in2013 ~~these financial statements~~ because the Company ~~cannot~~could ~~be assured it is more likely than~~ not itsubstantiate ~~will~~that ~~utilize~~there ~~the~~would ~~net~~be ~~operating~~a ~~losses~~future ~~carried~~economic ~~forward~~benefit arising infrom ~~future~~this ~~years~~payment.

6IMPUTED INTEREST – The Company calculates imputed interest expense at an interest rate of 8% (2013: 8%) per annum. Interest expense for the three months ended July, 31, 2014 was $322 (April 30, 2014: $1,230)

INCOME TAXES - The Company accounts ~~currently~~for ~~has~~income ~~net~~taxes ~~operating~~under ~~loss~~the ~~carryforwards~~provisions ~~aggregating~~issued ~~$13,371~~by ~~(2013:~~the ~~$7,069),~~FASB which ~~expire~~requires ~~through~~recognition ~~2033~~of deferred tax liabilities and assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the consolidated financial statements or tax returns. Under ~~The~~this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the difference between the financial statement and tax ~~asset~~bases ~~related~~of toassets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the ~~carryforwards~~year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The Company computes tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefit of net operating losses has not been ~~fully~~recognized ~~reserved~~in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.

The Company currently has ~~deferred~~net ~~income~~operating loss ~~tax~~carryforwards ~~assets~~aggregating $24,809 ~~which~~(2014: ~~have~~$20,362), ~~been~~which ~~fully~~expire ~~reserved,~~through as2033. ~~follows~~The asdeferred oftax ~~January~~asset ~~31,~~related ~~2014~~to ~~and~~the ~~April~~carryforwards has ~~30,~~been ~~2013:~~fully reserved.

	January 31, 2014			April 30, 2013
Deferred tax assets	$	4,680		$	2,474
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets		(4,680	)		(2,474	)
Net deferred tax assets	$	—		$	—

The Company has deferred income tax assets, which have been fully reserved, as follows as of July, 31, 2014 and April 30, 2014:

LOSS PER COMMON SHARE - The Company reports net loss per share in accordance with provisions of the FASB. The provisions require dual presentation of basic and diluted loss per share. Basic net loss per share excludes the impact of common stock equivalents. Diluted net loss per share utilizes the average market price per share when applying the treasury stock method in determining common stock equivalents. As of January 31, 2014 and April 30, 2013 there were no common stock equivalents outstanding.

	July 31, 2014			April 30, 2014
Deferred tax assets	$	8,683		$	7,127
Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets		(8,683	)		(7,127	)
Net deferred tax assets	$	—		$	—

~~FAIR VALUE~~LOSS OFPER ~~FINANCIAL~~COMMON ~~INSTRUMENTS~~ SHARE - The Company ~~Pursuant~~reports tonet ~~ASC~~loss ~~No.~~per ~~820,~~share ~~“Fair~~in ~~Value~~accordance ~~Measurements~~with ~~and~~provisions ~~Disclosures”,~~of the ~~Company~~FASB. The ~~is required~~provisions torequire ~~estimate~~dual ~~the~~presentation of ~~fair~~basic ~~value~~and ofdiluted ~~all~~loss ~~financial~~per ~~instruments~~share. ~~included~~Basic onnet ~~its~~loss ~~balance~~per ~~sheet~~share asexcludes the impact of ~~January~~common ~~31,~~stock ~~2014~~equivalents. ~~and~~Diluted ~~April~~net loss ~~30,~~per ~~2013.~~share ~~The~~utilizes ~~Company’s~~the ~~financial~~average ~~instruments~~market ~~consist~~price ofper ~~cash. The~~share ~~Company~~when ~~considers~~applying the ~~carrying~~treasury ~~value~~stock ofmethod ~~such amounts~~ in ~~the~~determining ~~financial~~common ~~statements~~stock toequivalents. As ~~approximate~~of ~~their~~July, ~~fair~~31, ~~value~~2014 ~~due~~and toApril ~~the~~30, ~~short-term~~2014 ~~nature~~there ofwere ~~these~~no ~~financial~~common ~~instruments~~stock equivalents outstanding.

~~RECENTLY ISSUED~~FAIR ~~ACCOUNTING~~VALUE ~~PRONOUNCEMENTS~~OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS - InPursuant ~~February~~to ~~2013,~~ASC ~~the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU)~~ No. ~~2013-02~~820, ~~Comprehensive~~“Fair ~~Income~~Value ~~(Topic~~Measurements ~~220):~~and ~~Reporting~~Disclosures”, ofthe ~~Amounts~~Company ~~Reclassified~~is ~~Out~~required ~~of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income,~~ to ~~improve~~estimate the ~~transparency~~fair value of ~~reporting~~all ~~these~~financial ~~reclassifications.~~instruments ~~Other~~included ~~comprehensive~~on ~~income~~its ~~includes~~balance ~~gains~~sheet ~~and~~as ~~losses that~~of ~~are~~July, ~~initially~~31, ~~excluded~~2014 ~~from~~and ~~net~~April ~~income~~30, ~~for an accounting period~~2014. ~~Those~~The ~~gains~~Company’s ~~and~~financial instruments ~~losses~~consist ~~are later reclassified out~~ of ~~accumulated other comprehensive income into net income~~cash. The ~~amendments~~Company inconsiders the ~~ASU~~carrying dovalue ~~not~~of ~~change~~such ~~the~~amounts ~~current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income~~ in the financial statements. ~~All~~to approximate oftheir ~~the~~fair ~~information~~value ~~that~~due ~~this ASU requires already is required~~ to bethe ~~disclosed~~short-term ~~elsewhere~~nature inof ~~the~~these financial ~~statements under U~~instruments.~~S. GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to:~~

●RECENTLY ~~Present~~ISSUED ~~(either~~ACCOUNTING onPRONOUNCEMENTS - ~~the~~In ~~face~~February of2013, the ~~statement~~Financial ~~where~~Accounting ~~net~~Standards ~~income~~Board is(FASB) ~~presented~~issued orAccounting inStandards ~~the~~Update ~~notes~~(ASU) ~~the~~No. ~~effects~~2013-02, Comprehensive Income on(Topic ~~the~~220): ~~line~~Reporting ~~items~~of Amounts Reclassified Out of ~~net~~Accumulated ~~income~~Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of ~~significant~~reporting ~~amounts~~these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income -into net ~~but~~income. ~~only~~The ifamendments in the ~~item~~ASU ~~reclassified~~do isnot ~~required~~change ~~under~~the ~~U.S.~~current ~~GAAP~~requirements tofor bereporting ~~reclassified to~~ net income or other comprehensive income in ~~its~~financial ~~entirety~~statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the ~~same~~financial statements ~~reporting~~under ~~period;~~U.S. ~~and~~GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to:

● ~~Cross-reference~~Present ~~to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items~~ (~~that~~either ~~are~~on ~~not~~the ~~required~~face ~~under~~of ~~U.S.~~the ~~GAAP)~~statement towhere ~~be reclassified directly to~~ net income inis ~~their~~presented ~~entirety~~or in the ~~same~~notes) ~~reporting~~the ~~period.~~effects ~~This~~on ~~would be~~ the ~~case~~line ~~when~~items aof ~~portion~~net income of ~~the~~significant ~~amount~~amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is- ~~initially~~but ~~transferred~~only toif athe ~~balance~~item ~~sheet~~reclassified ~~account~~is (erequired under U.gS., ~~inventory~~GAAP ~~for~~to ~~pension-related~~be ~~amounts)~~reclassified ~~instead~~to ofnet ~~directly~~income toin ~~income~~its orentirety ~~expense.~~in the same reporting period; and

~~The amendments~~● ~~apply~~Cross-reference to ~~all~~other ~~public~~disclosures ~~and~~currently ~~private~~required ~~companies~~under ~~that~~U.S. ~~report~~GAAP ~~items~~for of other ~~comprehensive~~reclassification ~~income.~~items ~~Public~~(that ~~companies~~ are not required to ~~comply~~under ~~with~~U.S. ~~these~~GAAP) ~~amendments~~to ~~for~~be ~~all~~reclassified ~~reporting~~directly ~~periods~~to ~~(interim~~net ~~and~~income ~~annual).~~in ~~The~~their ~~amendments~~entirety ~~are~~in ~~effective~~the ~~for~~same reporting ~~periods beginning~~period. ~~after~~This ~~December~~would ~~15,~~be ~~2012,~~the ~~for~~case ~~public~~when ~~companies.~~a ~~Early~~portion ~~adoption~~of isthe ~~permitted.~~amount ~~The~~reclassified ~~adoption~~out of ~~ASU~~accumulated ~~No.~~other ~~2013-02~~comprehensive income is ~~not~~initially ~~expected~~ transferred to ~~have~~ a ~~material~~balance ~~impact~~sheet onaccount ~~our~~(e.g., ~~financial~~inventory ~~position~~for orpension-related ~~results~~amounts) instead of ~~operations~~directly to income or expense.

7The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

~~In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013~~-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 20116-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

~~In October~~(table ~~2012, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ASU 2012-04, “Technical Corrections and Improvements” in Accounting Standards Update No. 2012-04. The amendments in this update cover a wide range~~ of Topics in the Accounting Standards Codification. These amendments include technical corrections and improvements to the Accounting Standards Codification and conforming amendments related to fair value measurements. The amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning after December 15, 2012. The adoption of ASU 2012-04 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.contents)

In ~~August~~ ~~2012~~June 2014, the ~~FASB~~Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) ~~2012~~No. 2014-0312, ~~“Technical~~Compensation ~~Amendments~~– ~~and~~Stock ~~Corrections~~Compensation to(Topic ~~SEC Sections~~718): ~~Amendments~~Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. The new guidance requires that share-based compensation that require a specific performance target to ~~SEC~~be ~~Paragraphs~~achieved in order for employees ~~Pursuant~~to become eligible to ~~SEC~~vest ~~Staff~~in ~~Accounting~~the ~~Bulletin~~awards ~~(SAB)~~and Nothat could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. ~~114~~As such, ~~Technical~~the ~~Amendments~~performance ~~Pursuant~~target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation costs should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to ~~SEC~~the ~~Release~~period(s) Nofor which the requisite service has already been rendered. ~~33-9250~~If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and ~~Corrections~~after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are ~~Related~~expected to ~~FASB~~vest ~~Accounting~~and ~~Standards~~should ~~Update~~be ~~2010-22~~adjusted ~~(SEC~~to ~~Update)”~~reflect inthose ~~Accounting~~awards ~~Standards~~that ~~Update~~ultimately Novest. ~~2012-03~~The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. This ~~update~~new ~~amends~~guidance ~~various~~is ~~SEC~~effective ~~paragraphs~~for ~~pursuant~~fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this Update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the ~~issuance~~effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of ~~SAB~~the ~~No.~~beginning ~~114~~of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The adoption of ASU ~~2012~~ 2014-0312 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In ~~July~~ ~~2012~~June 2014, the FASB issued ASU ~~2012~~No. 2014-~~02,~~10: ~~“Intangibles~~Development Stage –Entities ~~Goodwill and Other~~ (Topic ~~350~~915): ~~Testing~~Elimination ~~Indefinite-Lived~~of ~~Intangible Assets~~Certain ~~for~~Financial ~~Impairment”~~Reporting inRequirements, ~~Accounting~~Including ~~Standards~~an ~~Update~~Amendment ~~No.~~to ~~2012-02.~~Variable ~~This~~Interest Entities ~~update~~Guidance ~~amends~~in ~~ASU~~Topic ~~2011-08~~810, ~~Intangibles~~Consolidation ~~– Goodwill~~, to improve financial reporting by reducing the cost and ~~Other~~complexity ~~(Topic~~associated ~~350):~~with the ~~Testing~~incremental ~~Indefinite-Lived~~reporting ~~Intangible~~requirements ~~Assets~~of ~~for~~development ~~Impairment~~stage ~~and~~entities. ~~permits~~The anamendments ~~entity~~in ~~first~~this toupdate ~~assess~~remove all incremental financial ~~qualitative~~reporting ~~factors~~requirements tofrom ~~determine~~U.S. ~~whether~~GAAP itfor isdevelopment ~~more~~stage ~~likely~~entities, ~~than~~thereby ~~not~~improving financial reporting by eliminating the cost and complexity associated with providing that aninformation. ~~indefinite-lived~~The ~~intangible~~amendments ~~asset~~in isthis ~~impaired~~Update asalso aeliminate an exception provided ~~basis~~to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether itan entity is ~~necessary~~a tovariable ~~perform~~interest entity on the basis ~~quantitative~~of ~~impairment~~the ~~test~~amount inof ~~accordance~~investment ~~with~~equity ~~Subtopic~~that ~~350-30, Intangibles~~is -at ~~Goodwill~~risk. ~~and~~The ~~Other~~amendments -to ~~General~~eliminate ~~Intangibles~~that ~~Other~~exception ~~than~~simplify ~~Goodwill~~U.S. ~~The~~GAAP ~~amendments~~by ~~are~~reducing avoidable ~~effective~~complexity ~~for~~in ~~annual~~existing accounting literature and ~~interim~~ ~~impairment~~improve ~~tests~~the ~~performed~~relevance ~~for~~of ~~fiscal~~information ~~years~~provided ~~beginning~~to ~~after~~financial ~~September~~statement users ~~15,~~by ~~2012.~~requiring ~~Early~~the ~~adoption~~application isof ~~permitted,~~the ~~including for~~same ~~annual~~consolidation ~~and~~guidance ~~interim~~by ~~impairment~~all ~~tests~~reporting ~~performed~~entities. asThe elimination of athe ~~date~~exception may ~~before~~change ~~July~~the 27consolidation analysis, ~~2012~~consolidation decision, ifand disclosure requirements for a ~~public~~reporting entity’s ~~financial~~that ~~statements~~has an interest ~~for~~in an entity in the ~~most~~development ~~recent~~stage. ~~annual~~The oramendments ~~interim~~related ~~period~~to ~~have~~the ~~not~~elimination ~~yet~~of ~~been~~inception-to-date ~~issued~~information ~~or,~~and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for ~~nonpublic~~the ~~entities~~clarification to Topic 275, ~~have~~which shall ~~not~~be ~~yet~~applied ~~been~~prospectively. ~~made~~For ~~available~~ public companies, those amendments are effective for ~~issuance~~annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU ~~2012~~2014-0210 ~~has~~is not ~~had~~expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

~~PLAN~~In July 2013, FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, "Presentation OFof ~~OPERATION~~an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists." The provisions of ASU No. 2013-11 require an entity to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or portion thereof, in the statement of financial position as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward or a tax credit carryforward, with certain exceptions related to availability. ASU No. 2013-11 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-11 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~During~~ In February 2013, the ~~next~~Financial ~~twelve~~Accounting Standards ~~months~~Board we(FASB) ~~plan~~issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to ~~spend~~improve ~~funds~~ the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from ~~our~~net ~~working~~income ~~capital~~for ~~balance~~an asaccounting ~~follows~~period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to:

	(1)	Costs related to legal fees for the preparation and of the subsequent Form S-1 registration statement with the SEC.
	(2)	Costs related to the examination of potential property acquisitions.
	(3)	Costs of acquiring mineral properties.
	(4)	Costs related to trenching and surface sampling.

8- Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense.

	(5)	Costs related to analyzing mineral claims.
	(6)	Salaries to be paid to officers of the corporation.
	(7)	Costs for accounting and auditing services.
	(8)	Costs of stationary, mail, telephone & other office supplies.
	(9)	Our exploration program would consist of the following 3 Phases to be carried out to test for gold mineralization within the project.

~~PHASE I~~-7-

~~The~~(table ~~Phase I program will require approximately one week to complete and will consisting~~ of grid emplacement, geological mapping in the vicinity of the known underground mine workings as well as rock sampling. An additional 3 weeks will be required to complete analysis of samples, data compilation and interpretation, drafting and report writing.contents)

~~Results~~In ~~gained~~January ~~from~~2013, the ~~program~~FASB ~~will~~issued ~~lead~~ASU No. to2013-01, aBalance ~~better~~Sheet ~~understanding~~(Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the ~~location~~offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and ~~controls~~imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, ~~mineralization~~the atBoard ~~known showings~~determined that it could make them more operable and atcost ~~any~~effective ~~new~~for ~~showings~~preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and/ those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or ~~anomalous~~after ~~areas~~January ~~discovered~~1, as2013. aThe ~~result~~adoption of ~~the~~ASU ~~Phase~~2013-01 Iis ~~program~~not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Personnel:
Project Geologist	4 days @ $800.00	$	3,200.00
Field Assistant	4 days @ $400.00		1,600.00
Field Costs:
Field Camp and Supplies	8 man/days @ $100.00/man/day (including camp rental, GPS rental, food, prospecting and sampling equipment, first aid and chain saw)		800.00
Field Communications	Long Distance charges Motorola 2 way field radios		100.00
Survey Consumables	Sample bags, survey flagging, pickets etc.		200.00
Transportation:
Truck Rental	4 days @ $200.00/day (including fuel)		800.00
Analytical:
Rock Samples	20 samples @ $50.00/sample (Au+32 element ICP)		1,000.00
Office & Engineering:
Report Writing (Memo form)	based on results of Phase I exploration program		1,200.00
Drafting/Cartography	(including field base map and all final maps detailing geological mapping, sample locations and results, location of old workings and compilation of results from previous work on property)		300.00
Total estimate cost of the Phase I exploration program		$	9,200.00

PLAN OF OPERATION

~~PHASE~~During the next twelve months we plan to spend funds from IIour working capital balance as follows:

The Phase II exploration program is contingent on the success of the Phase I program. A small campaign of diamond drilling is recommended to intersect the projected down dip extensions of the known mineralization below the deepest level previously mined.

	(1)	Costs related to legal fees related to the ongoing operations of the Company.

	(2)	Costs related to the examination of potential property acquisitions.

	(3)	Costs of acquiring mineral properties.

	(4)	Costs related to trenching and surface sampling.

Upon the completion of, and based on positive results from, the Phase 1 program additional detailed geological mapping, rock sampling and analysis will be carried out. The objective of this work will be to locate the most perspective geological targets for drill testing in the Phase 3 program. The estimated cost of this program is $40,000.

	(5)	Costs related to analyzing mineral claims.

	(6)	Salaries to be paid to officers of the corporation.

	(7)	Costs for accounting and auditing services.

	(8)	Costs of stationary, mail, telephone & other office supplies.

	(9)	Our exploration program would consist of the following 3 Phases to be carried out to test for gold mineralization within the project.

9PHASE I

The Phase 2I ~~steps~~program ~~would~~will berequire approximately one week to complete and will consisting of grid emplacement, geological mapping in the vicinity of the known underground mine workings as ~~follows:~~well as rock sampling. An additional 3 weeks will be required to complete analysis of samples, data compilation and interpretation, drafting and report writing.

-	mobilize the geological contractor to the property within 30 days of completing the Phase I exploration program which will be approximately 7 months from termination of our public offering; and
-	we will require approximately one month to complete the exploration work, rock analysis and summary report of our findings

Results gained from the program will lead to a better understanding of, the location of and controls of, mineralization at known showings and at any new showings and/or anomalous areas discovered as a result of the Phase I program.

Based on positive results from the Phase 2 program a Phase 3 exploration program could be planned.

Personnel:
Project Geologist	4 days @ $800.00	$	3,200.00
Field Assistant	4 days @ $400.00		1,600.00
Field Costs:
Field Camp and Supplies	8 man/days @ $100.00/man/day (including camp rental, GPS rental, food, prospecting and sampling equipment, first aid and chain saw)		800.00
Field Communications	Long Distance charges Motorola 2 way field radios		100.00
Survey Consumables	Sample bags, survey flagging, pickets etc.		200.00
Transportation:
Truck Rental	4 days @ $200.00/day (including fuel)		800.00
Analytical:
Rock Samples	20 samples @ $50.00/sample (Au+32 element ICP)		1,000.00
Office & Engineering:
Report Writing (Memo form)	based on results of Phase I exploration program		1,200.00
Drafting/Cartography	(including field base map and all final maps detailing geological mapping, sample locations and results, location of old workings and compilation of results from previous work on property)		300.00
Total estimate cost of the Phase I exploration program		$	9,200.00

~~PHASE III – (Diamond Drilling)~~-8-

~~Upon~~(table ~~the completion~~ of Phase 2, and based on positive results, a second larger diamond drill program would be initiated to provide additional information. This would consist of approximately 1,600 feet of diamond drilling. The estimated cost of the Phase 3 program is $200,000.contents)

~~Phase~~PHASE ~~3 steps would be as follows~~II:

~~- initiate~~The Phase II exploration program is contingent on the ~~approximately~~success 90of ~~day~~the ~~permitting~~Phase ~~process~~I ~~for~~program. A small campaign of diamond drilling is ~~immediately~~recommended ~~upon~~to ~~receiving~~intersect the ~~geological~~projected ~~report~~down ~~detailing~~dip ~~the~~extensions ~~results~~ of the ~~Phase~~known 2mineralization ~~program;~~below the deepest level previously mined.

-Upon the completion of, and based ~~mobilize~~on ~~drill~~positive ~~contractor~~results from, the Phase 1 program additional detailed geological mapping, rock sampling and analysis will be carried out. The objective of this work will be to ~~site~~locate ~~within~~the 15most ~~months~~perspective geological targets for drill testing in the Phase 3 program. The estimated cost of ~~completing~~this ~~our~~program ~~public~~is ~~offering;~~$40,000.

~~- drilling~~Phase ~~would take approximately~~ 2 ~~months~~steps would tobe ~~complete;~~as follows:

- drill core laboratory analysis would require an additional 2 months (approximately); and

-	mobilize the geological contractor to the property within 30 days of completing the Phase I exploration program which will be approximately 7 months from termination of our public offering; and

-	we will require approximately one month to complete the exploration work, rock analysis and summary report of our findings

~~- the~~Based ~~preparation~~on ~~of a report detailing the~~ positive results offrom the ~~drill~~Phase 2 program ~~together~~a ~~with~~Phase ~~the~~3 ~~results of the first two phases of~~ exploration ~~would~~ ~~require~~program ancould ~~additional~~be ~~month~~planned.

~~The Phase~~PHASE 3III – ~~program would require a total of~~ (~~8 months~~Diamond Drilling) ~~from initiating of permitting process to receipt of final geological report.~~

~~At this~~Upon ~~point~~the completion of ~~the~~Phase ~~drilling would be approximately 19 months after completing our public offering. Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd. relied on the expert opinion and recommendations of Mr. Craig Parkinson~~2, ~~Professional Geologist registered in the State of~~ ~~Arizona (PG #30843)~~ and ~~whose~~based ~~Consent~~on ~~has~~positive ~~been filed as an exhibit to S-1. Mr. Michael Parkinson~~results, ~~prepared~~ a ~~technical~~second ~~report entitled~~larger “diamond ~~Summary~~drill ~~Report~~program onwould ~~the~~be ~~Gold~~initiated ~~Eagle~~to ~~Mine~~provide ~~Property”~~additional ~~(the “Technical Report”)~~information. ~~We have consulted with~~ This ~~Mr.~~would ~~Parkinson~~consist ~~from~~of ~~time~~approximately to1,600 ~~time~~feet ~~and~~of ~~believe~~diamond ~~our~~drilling. The ~~estimates~~estimated ~~are~~cost ~~reasonable~~of inthe ~~light~~Phase of3 ~~Mr.~~program ~~Parkinson’s~~is ~~expertise~~$200,000.

In ~~the~~Phase ~~event~~3 ~~that~~steps ~~the~~would ~~proceeds~~be raised are insufficient to start exploring, we will attempt to raise additional money through a subsequent private placement, public offering or through loans. If we do not raise all of the money we need to complete our exploration of the property, we will have to find alternative sources, like a second public offering, a private placement of securities, or loans from our officers or others. If we need additional cash and can’t raise it we will either have to suspend operations until we do raise the cash, or cease operations entirely. Other than as ~~described in this paragraph, we have no other financing plans.~~ follows:

~~Results~~- initiate the approximately 90 day permitting process for drilling immediately upon receiving the geological report detailing the results of ~~Operations~~the Phase 2 program;

~~For~~- mobilize ~~the~~drill ~~Three~~contractor ~~Month Period Ended January 31, 2014, the period from inception (November 7, 2012)~~ to ~~January~~site ~~31,~~within ~~2013,~~15 ~~the~~months ~~nine~~of ~~month period~~completing ~~ended~~our ~~January~~public ~~31, 2014 and for the period from inception (November 7, 2012) to January 31, 2014.~~offering;

We- drilling ~~recorded~~would notake approximately 2 ~~revenues for the three~~ months ~~and nine months ended January 31, 2014. From the period of November 7, 2012 (inception)~~ to ~~January 31, 2014, we recorded no revenues.~~complete;

10- drill core laboratory analysis would require an additional 2 months (approximately); and

~~For~~ - the ~~three months ending January 31, 2014, we incurred expenses of $2,349, consisting of consulting Legal and accounting services~~preparation of ~~$1,500,~~a ~~general~~report ~~and~~detailing ~~administrative~~the ~~expenses~~results of ~~$512,~~the ~~office~~drill ~~supplies~~program oftogether ~~$20~~with ~~and~~the ~~imputed~~results ~~interest expense~~ of ~~$317. By comparison, for~~ the ~~period~~first ~~from~~two ~~inception~~phases ~~(November 7, 2012) to January 31, 2013, we incurred expenses~~ of ~~$0. Our~~exploration ~~net~~would ~~loss~~require ~~for~~an ~~the~~additional ~~three months ending January 31, 2014 was $2,349, and our net loss for the period from inception (November 7, 2012) to January 31, 2013 was $0~~month.

~~For the~~The ~~nine~~Phase ~~months ending January 31, 2014, we incurred expenses of $7,220, consisting of consulting Legal and accounting services~~3 ofprogram ~~$4,300,~~would ~~general~~require ~~and~~a ~~administrative~~total ~~expenses~~ of ~~$600,~~(8 ~~consulting~~months) ~~services~~from ofinitiating ~~$1,000, office supplies~~ of ~~$402~~permitting ~~and~~process ~~imputed~~to ~~interest expense~~receipt of ~~$918. Our~~final ~~net~~geological ~~loss for the nine months ending January 31, 2014 was $7,220~~report.

~~From~~At this point completion of the ~~period~~drilling would be approximately 19 months after completing our public offering. Emerald Isle Exploration Ltd. relied on the expert opinion and recommendations of ~~November~~Mr. 7Craig Parkinson, ~~2012~~Professional Geologist registered in the State of Arizona (~~inception~~PG #30843) and whose Consent has been filed as an exhibit to ~~January~~S-1. ~~31,~~Mr. ~~2014~~Michael Parkinson, prepared a technical report entitled “Summary Report on the Gold Eagle Mine Property” (the “Technical Report”). We have consulted with Mr. Parkinson from time to time and believe our ~~net~~estimates ~~loss~~are ~~was~~reasonable ~~$15,289~~in light of Mr. Parkinson’s expertise.

~~Liquidity~~In the event that the proceeds raised are insufficient to start exploring, we will attempt to raise additional money through a subsequent private placement, public offering or through loans. If we do not raise all of the money we need to complete our exploration of the property, we will have to find alternative sources, like a second public offering, a private placement of securities, or loans from our officers or others. If we need additional cash and ~~Capital~~can’t ~~Resources~~raise it we will either have to suspend operations until we do raise the cash, or cease operations entirely. Other than as described in this paragraph, we have no other financing plans.

~~Our cash~~Results ~~balance at January 31, 2014 was $1,729 with $16,100 in outstanding liabilities. Total expenditures over the next 12 months are expected to be approximately $61,705. If we experience a shortage~~ of funds prior to generating revenues from operations we may utilize funds from our directors, who have informally agreed to advance funds to allow us to pay for operating costs, however they have no formal commitment, arrangement or legal obligation to advance or loan funds to us. Management believes our current cash balance will not be sufficient to fund our operations for the next twelve months.Operations

~~Subsequent~~For the Three Month Period Ended July 31, 2014 and July ~~Events~~31, 2013 and the period from inception (November 7, 2012) to July, 31, 2014.

~~There were~~We recorded no ~~subsequent~~revenues ~~events~~for upthe tothree months ~~the~~and ~~date~~nine months ended January 31, 2014. From the ~~financial~~period ~~statements~~of ~~were~~November ~~issued~~7, 2012 (inception) to January 31, 2014, we recorded no revenues.

~~ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.~~-9-

~~As a smaller reporting company~~ (astable ~~defined in Rule 12b-2~~ of ~~the Exchange Act~~contents)~~, we are not required to provide the information called for by this Item 3.~~

~~ITEM~~For the three months ending July 31, 2014, we incurred expenses of $4,769, consisting of legal and accounting services of $2,500, general, administrative expenses of $1,947, and imputed interest expense of $322. Our ~~CONTROLS~~net ~~AND~~loss ~~PROCEDURES~~for the three months ending July 31, 2013 was $2,692.

~~Under the~~For ~~supervision and with~~ the ~~participation~~period offrom ~~our~~inception ~~management, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer~~(November ~~are responsible for conducting an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures~~7, as ~~defined in Rules 13a-15(e~~2012) ~~and~~to ~~15d-15(e)~~July ~~under~~31, ~~the Securities Exchange Act of 1934~~2014, aswe ofincurred ~~the~~expenses ~~end~~ of ~~the interim period covered by this report~~$25,809. Our ~~Disclosure~~net ~~controls~~loss ~~and~~for ~~procedures means that~~ the ~~material~~three ~~information~~months ~~required~~ending toJuly be31, ~~included~~2014 inwas ~~our Securities and Exchange Commission reports is recorded~~$4, ~~processed~~769, ~~summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules~~ and ~~forms relating to~~ our ~~company,~~net ~~including~~loss ~~any~~for ~~consolidating subsidiaries, and was made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during~~ the period ~~when~~from ~~this~~inception ~~report~~(November ~~was being prepared. Based on this evaluation~~7, ~~our~~2012) ~~principal~~to ~~executive~~July ~~officer and principal financial officer concluded as of the evaluation date that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of January~~ 31, 2014 was $27,361.

~~There were~~Liquidity noand ~~changes~~Capital in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.Resources

11Our cash balance at July 31, 2014 was $27,243 with $18,052 in outstanding liabilities. Total expenditures over the next 12 months are expected to be approximately $61,705. If we experience a shortage of funds prior to generating revenues from operations we may utilize funds from our directors, who have informally agreed to advance funds to allow us to pay for operating costs, however they have no formal commitment, arrangement or legal obligation to advance or loan funds to us. Management believes our current cash balance will not be sufficient to fund our operations for the next twelve months.

~~PART II.~~Subsequent ~~OTHER INFORMATION~~Events

~~ITEM~~There were no subsequent events up to 1.the ~~LEGAL~~date ~~PROCEEDINGS~~the financial statements were issued.

~~The Company~~ITEM ~~is not currently subject to any legal proceedings~~3. ~~From~~QUANTITATIVE ~~time~~AND toQUALITATIVE ~~time,~~DISCLOSURES ~~the~~ABOUT ~~Company~~MARKET ~~may become subject to litigation or proceedings in connection with its business, as either a plaintiff or defendant~~RISK. There are no such pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party that, in the opinion of management, is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

~~ITEM~~As a smaller reporting company (as defined ~~1A.~~in ~~RISK~~Rule ~~FACTORS~~12b-2 of the Exchange Act), we are not required to provide the information called for by this Item 3.

~~As a~~ITEM ~~smaller~~4. ~~reporting~~CONTROLS ~~company~~AND ~~(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act), we are not required to provide the information called for by this Item 1A~~PROCEDURES.

~~ITEM~~Under the supervision and with the participation 2of our management, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer are responsible for conducting an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as of the end of the interim period covered by this report. ~~UNREGISTERED~~Disclosure ~~SALES~~controls OFand procedures ~~EQUITY~~means ~~SECURITIES~~that ~~AND~~the ~~USE~~material OFinformation ~~PROCEEDS~~required to be included in our Securities and Exchange Commission reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms relating to our company, including any consolidating subsidiaries, and was made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period when this report was being prepared. Based on this evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded as of the evaluation date that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of January 31, 2014.

~~None~~There were no changes in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

~~ITEM 3~~PART II. ~~DEFAULTS~~OTHER ~~UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.~~INFORMATION

~~None~~ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

~~ITEM~~The Company is not currently subject 4to any legal proceedings. ~~MINE~~From ~~SAFETY~~time ~~DISCLOSURES~~to time, the Company may become subject to litigation or proceedings in connection with its business, as either a plaintiff or defendant. There are no such pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party that, in the opinion of management, is likely to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

~~None~~ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

~~ITEM~~As a smaller reporting company (as defined 5.in ~~OTHER~~Rule ~~INFORMATION~~12b-2 of the Exchange Act), we are not required to provide the information called for by this Item 1A.

~~None~~ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

~~ITEM 6~~None. ~~EXHIBITS.~~

~~(a) Exhibits~~ITEM ~~required~~3. byDEFAULTS ~~Item~~UPON ~~601~~SENIOR ~~of Regulation SK~~SECURITIES.

Number		Description
3.1		Articles of Incorporation*
3.2		Bylaws*
31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

-10-

101.INS**		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

(table of contents)

* Filed and incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File NoNone. ~~333-189630), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 27, 2013.~~

** XBRLITEM ~~(Extensible~~4. ~~Business~~MINE ~~Reporting~~SAFETY Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sectionsDISCLOSURES.

12None.

~~SIGNATURES~~ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.

~~Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized~~None.

	EMERALD ISLE EXPLORATION LTD.
	(Name of Registrant)
Date: March 11, 2014	By:	/s/ Samuell Eads
		Name: Samuell Eads
		Title: President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director (principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer)

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

13(a) Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation SK.

EXHIBIT INDEX

Number		Description

3.1		Articles of Incorporation*

3.2		Bylaws*

31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

Number		Description
101.INS**		XBRL Instance Document
3.1		Articles of Incorporation*
101.SCH**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
3.2		Bylaws*
101.CAL**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.DEF**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.LAB**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.PRE**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.INS **		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

* Filed and incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1, as amended (File No. 333-189630), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 27, 2013.

* * XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting ~~Filed~~Language) information is furnished and ~~incorporated~~not byfiled ~~reference~~or toa ~~the~~part ~~Company’s~~of ~~Registration~~a ~~Statement~~registration onstatement ~~Form~~or ~~S-1,~~prospectus asfor ~~amended~~purposes ~~(File~~of ~~No.~~Sections ~~333-189630),~~11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed ~~with~~for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities ~~and~~ Exchange Act ~~Commission~~of on1934, ~~June~~as 27amended, ~~2013~~and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

** XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections -11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.-

(table of contents)

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	EMERALD ISLE EXPLORATION LTD.
	(Name of Registrant)

Date: September 12, 2014	By:	*/s/ Samuell Eads*
		Name: Samuell Eads
		Title: President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director (principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer)

-12-

Filing Compare · Emerald Isle Explorations Ltd.