UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

Mark One

x QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2015

o TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission file number: 000-55287

GENERATION ZERO GROUP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Nevada		20-5465816
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

13663 PROVIDENCE ROAD, SUITE #253

WEDDINGTON, NC 28104

(ADDRESS OF PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE OFFICES)

(470) 809-0707

(REGISTRANT'S TELEPHONE NUMBER)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X ] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer [ ]	Accelerated filer[ ]
Non-accelerated filer [ ]	Smaller reporting company [X]

(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X].

As of August 10, 2015, the issuer had 52,065,954 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share issued and outstanding. This does not include 556,456 shares which the issuer has agreed to issue (as described below), which have not been physically issued as of the date of this filing and have not been included in the number of issued and outstanding shares disclosed throughout this report.1

As of October 23, 2015, the issuer had 52,109,068 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share issued and outstanding. This does not include 513,352 shares which the issuer has agreed to issue (as described below), which have not been physically issued as of the date of this filing and have not been included in the number of issued and outstanding shares disclosed throughout this report.

Documents Incorporated by Reference: NONE

Generation Zero Group, Inc.

FORM 10-Q

Table of Contents

		Page
	PART I
Item 1.	Consolidated Financial Statements
	Consolidated Balance Sheets	F-1
	Consolidated Statements of Operations (unaudited)	F-2
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)	F-3
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	F-4
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion And Analysis Of Financial Condition And Results Of Operations	4
Item 3.	Quantitative And Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	14
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	14
	PART II
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	14
Item 1A:	Risk Factors	16
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales Of Equity Securities And Use Of Proceeds	16
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	17
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	17
Item 5.	Other Information	17
Item 6.	Exhibits	17

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)

GENERATION ZERO GROUP, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	(UNAUDITED)	(AUDITED)
	June 30,	December 31,
	September 30,	December 31,
	2015	2014
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash	$ 31,~~732~~932	$ 33,071
Total current assets	$ 31,~~732~~932	$ 33,071
Property, plant and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation
Intangible assets, net of amortization	$ 2,~~881~~827,~~801~~019	$ 2,988,849
Total assets	$ 2,~~885~~828,~~533~~951	$ 3,021,920
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable	$ ~~197~~223,~~214~~009	$ 121,954
Accrued liabilities	$ ~~165~~190,~~929~~955	$ 160,~~469~~468
Short-term debt - related party	$ ~~108~~152,~~996~~056	$ 28,500
Notes payable due within 1 year - related party	$ 345,161	$ 345,161
Notes payable due within 1 year - other	$ 3,294,007	$ 3,294,007
Total current liabilities	$ 4,~~111~~205,~~307~~188	$ 3,950,~~091~~090
Notes payable, long term - related party	$ 175,000	$ 175,000
Notes payable, long term - other	$ 110,000	$ 85,000
Total liabilities	$ 4,~~396~~490,~~307~~188	$ 4,210,~~091~~090
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized:
Series A Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 1,000 shares	$ 1	$ 1
designated; 1,000 shares issued and outstanding
Series B Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 2,000,000 shares	$ -0	$ -0
designated; 0 shares issued and outstanding
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 100,000,000 shares	$ 52,~~066~~109	$ 48,644
authorized; 52,065,954 and 48,643,868 issued and outstanding
authorized; 52,065,936 and 48,643,868 issued and outstanding
Additional paid-in capital	$ 6,671,185	$ 6,646,475
Deficit accumulated during the development stage	$ (8,~~234~~384,~~027~~532)	$ (7,883.,291)
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)	$ (1,~~510~~661,~~774~~237)	$ (1,188,170)
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)	$ 2,~~885~~828,~~533~~951	$ 3,021,920
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-1

GENERATION ZERO GROUP, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EXPENSES

	(UNAUDITED)		(UNAUDITED)		(UNAUDITED)
	Three Months Ended		~~Six~~Nine Months Ended		May 16, 2006 (Inception) Through
	June 30,		June 30,		June 30,
	September 30,		September 30,		September 30,
	2015	2014	2015	2014	2015
Revenues	$ 12,~~840~~536	$ 4214,~~766~~132	$ 710,~~528~~065	$ 5165,~~217~~350	$ ~~519~~522,~~521~~057
Cost of Sales	$ 4,~~156~~697	$ 01,815	$ 611,~~871~~568	$ 01,815	$ 2328,~~759~~456
Gross Profit	$ (2,~~315~~161)	$ 4212,~~766~~317	$ ~~657~~(1,503)	$ 5163,~~217~~535	$ ~~495~~493,~~762~~601
Operating Expenses:
General, selling and administrative	$ 5957,~~456~~577	$ ~~120~~66,~~993~~376	$ ~~169~~227,~~518~~096	$ ~~158~~225,~~664~~039	$ 1,~~590~~648,~~560~~137
Impairment of oil and gas properties	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 32,520
Impairment of intangible asset	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 1,186,666
Depreciation and amortization	$ 66,667	$ 66,667	$ ~~133~~200,~~333~~000	$ ~~133~~200,~~333~~000	$ 1,~~384~~451,~~424~~091
Total operating expenses	$ ~~126~~124,~~123~~244	$ ~~187~~133,~~660~~043	$ ~~302~~427,~~852~~096	$ ~~291~~425,~~997~~039	$ 4,~~194~~318,~~170~~414
Operating loss	$ (~~128~~126,~~438~~405)	$ (~~144~~120,~~894~~726)	$ (~~302~~428,~~194~~599)	$ (~~240~~361,~~780~~504)	$ (3,~~698~~824,~~408~~813)
Other revenue and expenses:
Loss from discontinued operations	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ (1,788,987)
Loss on abandonment of assets	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ (3,028)
Forgiveness of debt	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 852,527
Interest income	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0	$ 0
Interest expense	$ (2524,~~183~~101)	$ (311,~~667~~889)	$ (4872,~~542~~643)	$ (2031,~~072~~961)	$ (3,~~596~~620,~~130~~231)
Net income (loss)	$ (~~153~~150,~~621~~506)	$ (~~148~~132,~~561~~615)	$ (~~350~~501,~~737~~242)	$ (~~260~~393,~~852~~465)	$ (8,~~234~~384,~~027~~532)
Basic and diluted net loss per common share	$ (0.00)	$ (0.00)	$ (0.01)	$ (0.01)
Weighted average common shares outstanding	5053,~~232~~419,~~065~~323	4748,~~047~~595,~~396~~593	5053,~~232~~419,~~066~~323	4748,~~047~~595,~~396~~593

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-2

GENERATION ZERO GROUP, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	(UNAUDITED)		(UNAUDITED)
	Six Months Ended		May 16, 2006 (Inception) Through
	Nine Months Ended		May 16, 2006 (Inception) Through
	June 30,		June 30,
	September 30,		September 30,
	2015	2014	2015
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$ (~~350~~501,~~737~~242)	$ (~~260~~393,~~852~~466)	$ (8,~~234~~384,~~027~~532)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash used:
Depreciation	$ 0	$ 0	$ 4,108
Amortization of debt discount	$ 0	$ 0	$ 2,712,733
Amortization of intangible assets	$ ~~133~~200,~~333~~000	$ ~~133~~200,~~333~~000	$ 1,~~380~~446,~~000~~667
Debt used for interest	$ 0	$ 0	$ 264
Impairment of oil and gas properties	$ 0	$ 0	$ 32,520
Impairment of intangible assets	$ 0	$ 0	$ 1,186,666
Stock issued for services	$ 2824,~~133~~710	$ 216,~~568~~375	$ 5956,~~433~~010
Warrant expense	$ 0	$ 0	$ 19,119
Donated services	$ 0	$ 0	$ 65,000
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts payable	$ 75101,~~259~~055	$ (3103,~~534)~~628	$ ~~196~~222,~~866~~662
Accrued liabilities	$ 530,~~461~~488	$ 582,~~071~~137	$ ~~186~~211,~~718~~745
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES	$ (~~108~~144,~~550~~989)	$ (7071,~~414~~326)	$ (2,~~390~~427,~~600~~039)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Purchase of fixed assets	$ 0	$ 0	$ (7,453)
Purchase of intangible assets	$ (2638,~~285~~170)	$ (5375,~~348~~549)	$ (90102,~~505~~390)
Proceeds from sale of properties	$ 0	$ 0	$ 29,980
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) INVESTING ACTIVITIES	$ (2638,~~285~~170)	$ (5375,~~348~~549)	$ (6779,~~978~~863)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from related party debt	$ 80123,~~496~~556	$ ~~101~~100,~~362~~000	$ ~~395~~438,~~496~~556
Proceeds from third party debt	$ 25,000	$ 049,154	$ 556,210
Repayments of related party debt	$ 0	$ 0	$ (75,694)
Repayments of third party debt	$ 0	$ 0(11,086)	$ (294,042)
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock	$ 0	$ 0	$ 157,510
Proceeds from issuance of common stock	$ 03,465	$ 9(3,~~960~~275)	$ 1,~~722~~726,~~830~~295
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) FINANCING ACTIVITIES	$ ~~105~~152,~~496~~021	$ ~~111~~134,~~322~~793	$ 2,~~462~~508,~~310~~835
NET CHANGE IN CASH	$ (2931,~~339~~139)	$ (12,~~439~~082)	$ 31,~~732~~932
Cash, beginning of period	$ 33,071	$ 17,767
Cash, end of period	$ 31,~~732~~932	$ 5,~~328~~685	$ 31,~~732~~932
See notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-3

GENERATION ZERO GROUP, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Business. Generation Zero Group, Inc. (“Generation Zero” or the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on May 16, 2006. From inception, until the acquisition of Find.com (as described below), the Company operated as a start-up entity pursuing opportunities in oil and gas exploration and development with a geographic focus in Texas and Louisiana.

With the acquisition of Find.com, the Company has made a concerted effort to focus on growing Find.com into a profitable business and other new opportunities and businesses that will attempt to increase the value of the Company’s common stock.

Basis of Presentation. The consolidated financial statements of Generation Zero have been prepared by Generation Zero, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and in accordance with accounting principles.

Use of Estimates. In preparing financial statements, management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities in the balance sheet and expenses in the statement of expenses. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements. The Company has reviewed all recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements and does not expect the future adoption of any such pronouncements to have a significant impact on its results of operations, financial condition or cash flow.

NOTE 2 – GOING CONCERN

As shown in the accompanying financial statements, Generation Zero incurred net losses of $~~260~~393,~~852~~465 and $~~350~~501,~~737,~~242 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2015, respectively, and had an accumulated deficit of $8,~~234~~384,~~027~~532 as of ~~June~~September 30, 2015. These conditions raise substantial doubt as to Generation Zero’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company is trying to raise additional capital. The Company is in the process of evaluating both joint venture partners and acquisitions with proven revenue streams. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if Generation Zero is unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 3 - INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The intangible assets all relate to the URL www.Find.com and the related underlying technology driving the website at the time of acquisition. These intangibles are deemed to be amortized over a fifteen year period.

www.Find.com Technology

During April 2010, Generation Zero entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Find.com Acquisition, Inc. to acquire all of Find.com Acquisition’s interest in and ownership of the technology assets that powered the operations of the www.Find.com website and all associated intellectual property rights necessary to enable Generation Zero to register the technology and intellectual property in Generation Zero’s name. The purchase also included all service contracts related to the operations of the technology that, at the time of acquisition, related to the operation of www.Find.com, and other related domain names. The purchase did not include any liabilities of Find.com Acquisition or the Find.com URL. The asset was valued at $1,300,000 based upon a fair market valuation report prepared by a third party valuation specialist. The Company issued 10,000,000 shares of restricted common stock as purchase consideration. In January 2011, Find.com Acquisition liquidated its assets and distributed the 10,000,000 shares of Generation Zero’s restricted common stock which it held to its shareholders.

F-4

The Company began pursuing an alternative strategy for the Find.com URL and opportunities for the Company in the fourth quarter of 2010. Generation Zero as of December 31, 2010 was uncertain as to whether it would be able to utilize the full functionality of the acquired technology assets on future initiatives unrelated to Find.com, and accordingly recorded an impairment charge of ($1,100,000) based on the fact that the timing of any future initiatives was unknown and uncertain. The technology assets, after the impairment charge, were valued at $200,000.

Current management of Generation Zero is in the process of locating the acquired assets to further identify the components, licensed software rights and functionality of the technology assets. Until discovery and evaluation can be completed, the Company has determined that a further impairment charge is appropriate and has thus valued the acquired technology assets at $1.

As part of ongoing discovery efforts, current management discovered that Google had placed indexing restrictions against the Find.com URL, although it was still indexing on other major search engines such as Yahoo and Bing. As of approximately June 21, 2014 the Company succeeded in removing the Google penalty, and now has ~~had~~ over 1546,000 pages indexing on Google.

www.Find.com URL (“URL”)

On June 30, 2010, Generation Zero entered into a Share Exchange Agreement with various members of Find.com URL Holding LLC, a Georgia limited liability company. Find.com URL Holding LLC owned 100% of the URL known as www.find.com. The purchase consideration included 14,988,567 shares of restricted common stock and secured notes. The URL was valued at $4,000,000 based upon a fair market valuation report prepared by a third party valuation specialist. The Company allocated this value to the consideration issued based on the relative fair value of the debt assumed and equity issued related to this purchase. Fair value of the debt was based upon the face value of the instrument while the fair value of the common stock was based on the quoted market price of the stock on June 30, 2010. The secured notes (identified in Note 7 below) were deeply discounted at the time of the transaction, with the discount amortized over the original term of the notes.

NOTE 4 – MANAGEMENT REORGANIZATION

Effective on May 13, 2013, the Company’s then sole Director and officer, Matthew Krieg, resigned and exchanged 1,000 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock which he held for 3,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock. On that same date, Cynthia S. White was issued 1,000 new shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock (a transaction which represented a change of control), was appointed as a Director, Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, and was issued 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock in consideration for serving in these capacities and for services previously rendered to the Company. On that same date, Mr. Krieg authorized and issued 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to the estate of Ronald Attkisson for services previously rendered to the Company by Mr. Attkisson, and appointed Christine B. Cheney as the Secretary/Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer of the Company. On May 15, 2013, Ms. Cheney was issued 2,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock in consideration for services previously rendered to the Company and in consideration for agreeing to be appointed as Chief Financial Officer of the Company. On that same date, Brian Waldo was appointed as the Chief Information Officer of the Company and was issued 1,300,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock in consideration for services rendered to the Company in connection with the development of the upgraded and redesigned website for Find.com and for agreeing to be appointed as the Company’s Chief Information Officer.

Effective on July 22, 2013, Ms. White resigned as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Board of Directors appointed Richard M. Morrell as the Chief Executive Officer, President and as a Director of the Company to fill the vacancy created by her resignation. The Board of Directors approved the issuance of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to Mr. Morrell in consideration for agreeing to serve as an officer and director of the Company and services previously provided to the Company. Effective November 27, 2013, Cynthia S. White resigned as a Director of the Company and as a Director and officer of the Company’s subsidiaries, and sold 1,000 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock to Richard Morrell.

F-5

NOTE 5 – CONTESTED LEGAL CLAIMS

On February 12, 2013, Geronimo Property Trust (“Geronimo”) filed a lawsuit against the Company, MedicalWork and StaffMD in the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia (File No. 2013CV227180), alleging breach of contract by the Company and MedicalWork, due to the Company’s and MedicalWork’s alleged failure to repay a $250,000 Secured Note (the “Geronimo Note”); unjust enrichment against MedicalWork and StaffMD; fraud against the Company due to alleged breaches of representations made by the Company; and seeking recovery of damages and attorneys’ fees. The suit also sought to enjoin Generation Zero from selling Find.com. The suit claimed that Geronimo never agreed to extend the due date of the Geronimo Note from February 1, 2012 to February 1, 2013 and that a total of approximately $357,500 was due pursuant to the Geronimo Note (including $250,000 of principal, $75,500 of interest and $32,000 of late charges.) Geronimo also alleged that it sent the Company a default notice relating to the Geronimo Note on February 9, 2012, provided that the Company never received such notice. The Geronimo Note had a security interest only in the MedicalWork assets, which are no longer owned by the Company. Jeffrey Sisk has agreed to indemnify the Company from all costs and damages associated from any claims or judgment associated with the Geronimo Note.

The Company subsequently filed an answer to the lawsuit, denying Geronimo’s claims, disputing substantially all of Geronimo’s allegations as untrue, and asserting counterclaims against Geronimo including tortious interference with business relations; conspiracy to commit tortious interference with business relations; defamation; conspiracy to commit defamation; breach of contract; fraud; conspiracy to commit fraud; and seeking attorney’s fees and expenses of litigation. Geronimo dropped all fraud claims and contest of the timely extension of the note and the Company dropped all asserted counterclaims against Geronimo.

On December 13, 2013, Geronimo was awarded a judgment specifically against the Company in the amount of $386,950 with an interest rate of 24%, ignoring the other defendants in the lawsuit.

Shareholders of the Company and Note Holders encouraged management to appeal this judgment. On January 10, 2014 the Company filed an appeal of the judgment.

The Company prevailed in a Motion to Supplement the Record which added substantive additional information to the file that was sent to the Appeals Court. On September 26, 2014 the Appeals Court remanded the case to the Trial Court for review and subsequent determination. Effective February 18, 2015, the Trial Court granted the Company’s Motion to Set Aside the Judgment.

At this stage of the process and the investigation efforts, the outcome cannot be predicted with any degree of reasonable certainty; however the Company intends to continue to vigorously defend itself against Geronimo’s claims.

The Company will also preserve its indemnity rights against Mr. Sisk (who agreed to indemnify it against claims associated with the Geronimo Note) to offset any damages. In the event the Company is ~~required~~not able to ~~pay~~recover ~~the~~costs ~~amounts~~associated ~~alleged~~with ~~owed~~this ~~under the Geronimo Judgment~~litigation, it would have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and financial condition and could force the curtailment or abandonment of operations. Additionally, the ongoing litigation could take resources away from the Company’s operations and tie up management’s time, which could further result in a material adverse effect on results of operations and financial condition.

F-6

Additionally, as a result of discoveries made during investigation efforts associated with the Geronimo Judgment appeal (specifically relating to events from 2010 and 2011 surrounding the Medical Work/StaffMD transactions), on April 29, 2014 the Company filed a Complaint, Civil Action #2014 cv 245686 in the Superior Court of Fulton County, in the State of Georgia, against various defendants in connection with the matters set forth in the Geronimo lawsuit. Pursuant to the Complaint, the Company is pursuing damages which the Company believes were caused by Emanuel Fialkow, Stacey Fialkow, Valerie McLellan and corporate entities they control (collectively, the "Fialkow Entities") acting directly and in concert with others. Generation Zero asserts that during the period of 2010 through 2011 the Fialkow Entities misappropriated money, corporate opportunities, stock and other assets from the Company and its then wholly-owned subsidiary, MedicalWork, LLC, and further breached contractual obligations to the Company and its then wholly-owned subsidiary. As a part of the Motion to Set Aside recently granted on the Geronimo Judgment, the Geronimo lawsuit was combined with this new litigation into one combined case going forward.

The Complaint filed by the Company outlines the actions and injuries uncovered thus far by the Company’s investigation and the Company intends to pursue all legal remedies available to it in connection with such Complaint. The outcome of this litigation cannot be predicted with any degree of reasonable certainty; however the Company intends to vigorously assert its legal rights against damages caused.

NOTE 6 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Generation Zero has borrowed short-term funding from shareholders and directors periodically in the past. The borrowings are due on demand with either ninety days or twelve months and one day’s notice. Cynthia S. White, our former Chief Executive Officer and Director, has loaned the Company $15,000, of which $10,000 was converted into a Bridge Note in September 2013 as disclosed in Note 7 below, leaving an outstanding balance of $5,000. Richard M. Morrell, the Company’s current Chief Executive Officer and Director, has loaned the Company $~~103~~147,~~996~~056 (not including amounts owed pursuant to Convertible Promissory Notes and other Notes Payable described below).

At ~~June~~September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, there was an outstanding balance for short-term loans of $~~108~~152,~~996~~056 and $36,000, respectively, due to the shareholders and directors of the Company as short-term related party debt.

Richard M. Morrell, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Director, has loaned the Company $~~328~~372,~~996~~056 as of ~~June~~September 30, 2015, $25,000 of which was evidenced by a Convertible Promissory Note issued July 11, 2013, bearing interest at the rate of 10% per annum with a maturity date of July 10, 2015; $100,000 of which was evidenced by a Convertible Promissory Note issued December 1, 2013, bearing interest at the rate of 10% per annum with a maturity date of November 30, 2015; $100,000 of which was evidenced by a Convertible Promissory Note issued July 1, 2014, bearing interest at the rate of 10% per annum with a maturity date of June 30, 2016; and $~~103~~147,~~996~~056 in short-term funding as disclosed above. The Convertible Promissory Notes are convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $0.08 per share.

Cynthia S. White, the Company’s former Chief Executive Officer and Director, has loaned the Company $113,771 as of ~~June~~September 30, 2015, $10,000 of which was evidenced by a Bridge Note as disclosed in Note 7 below, $5,000 of which represents short-term funding as disclosed above, and $98,771 which was evidenced by a Secured Note entered into on June 30, 2010, as disclosed in Note 7 below. Ms. White’s husband was also a holder of a Secured Note in the amount of $57,472, entered into on June 30, 2010, as disclosed in Note 7 below, and his debt is considered a related party debt.

On October 10, 2014, Thomas M. Cheney, the spouse of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, loaned the Company $75,000, which was evidenced by a Convertible Promissory Note (the “Convertible Note”). The Convertible Note accrues interest at the rate of 10% per annum (14% per annum upon an event of default) with such interest payable monthly and has a maturity date of October 9, 2016. The Convertible Note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at the option of Mr. Cheney at a conversion price of $0.08 per share. The Company is required to provide Mr. Cheney at least thirty days, but not more than sixty, days, prior notice in the event the Company desires to pre-pay the Convertible Note.

~~On September 30, 2013, the Company agreed to provide an inter~~F-company line of credit of up to $250,000 to the Company’s then newly formed wholly-owned subsidiary, Find.com, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Find.com”). As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, $104,771 and $137,343, respectively, had been advanced. All advanced amounts bear interest at the rate of 3% per annum and are due and payable six months from the date of each such advance. Advances will be used for operation and business development costs related to the Find.com e-commerce business. Effective on August 1, 2013, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Find.com URL Holding, provided a one year license to Find.com to use the Find.com URL. This license automatically renews each year unless notice of termination is provided by either party. Pursuant to the terms of the license, Find.com is required to pay 25% of the cash flow in excess of $1 million directly to the Company, which will be used to repay the Notes. The remainder of the funds generated by the Find.com URL is anticipated to be retained by Find.com for operations and business development. 7

On September 30, 2013, the Company agreed to provide an inter-company line of credit of up to $250,000 to the Company’s then newly formed wholly-owned subsidiary, Find.com, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“Find.com”). As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, $89,149 and $137,343, respectively, had been advanced. All advanced amounts bear interest at the rate of 3% per annum and are due and payable six months from the date of each such advance. Advances will be used for operation and business development costs related to the Find.com e-commerce business. Effective on August 1, 2013, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Find.com URL Holding, provided a one year license to Find.com to use the Find.com URL. This license automatically renews each year unless notice of termination is provided by either party. Pursuant to the terms of the license, Find.com is required to pay 25% of the cash flow in excess of $1 million directly to the Company, which will be used to repay the Notes. The remainder of the funds generated by the Find.com URL is anticipated to be retained by Find.com for operations and business development.

The Company owed Scientigo, Inc. $155,000 as part of the Find.com URL transaction referenced in Note 3 above. The Company made payments of $100,000 to Scientigo. The note was assumed by Phoenix Restructuring, Inc. in 2011. The note, with a current principal balance of $53,918, is in default. Management is in negotiations to extend the forbearance period and terms of payment.

NOTE 7 – THIRD PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On June 30, 2010, the Company issued secured notes to acquire the Find.com URL as referenced in Note 3 above, in the amount of $3,070,000 bearing interest at the rate of 12% and having a maturity date of December 31, 2011. The Company did not make the required payments under the secured Find.com notes to the holders thereof when due. The Collateral Agent for the Notes declared the Notes in default in November 2010. The Company originally negotiated a Forbearance Agreement with the Note Holders to effect forbearance for four months through March 15, 2011.

Generation Zero was not able to meet the terms of the Forbearance Agreement with the secured note holders. In April 2012, the secured note holders, with over majority approval, authorized the Collateral Agent to forbear in the exercise of its rights and remedies under the Secured Notes, Security Agreements, Operating Agreement, Forbearance Agreement and applicable law during a Forbearance Period commencing on June 30, 2010 and ending on the earlier to occur of January 2, 2014 or the date that any Forbearance Default (as defined in the Forbearance Agreement) occurs (the “Forbearance Period”). At the same time, the principal balance remaining on the Secured Notes was confirmed to be $2,920,250 and it was agreed that all accrued interest was forgiven and interest would not accrue or be assessed during the Forbearance Period. As a forbearance fee, Generation Zero agreed to issue 1,460,125 shares of restricted common stock pro-rata with the outstanding principal amount of the Notes held by each holder. A total of ~~556~~513,~~456~~352 of these shares have not been physically issued to date and are not included in the number of issued and outstanding shares disclosed throughout this filing. The authorized amendment to the Forbearance Agreement also provided for the restructure of Generation Zero Group, Inc. and the transfer of control from Mr. Krieg; which transfer of control has occurred to date as described in greater detail in Note 4. Further terms of the Forbearance Agreement were not met by January 2, 2014. The forbearance period was subsequently extended to January 2, 2015 and then automatically extended to January 2, 2016.

On November 4, 2010, a third party loaned the Company $150,000, which was evidenced by a promissory note in the amount of $250,000 bearing interest at the rate of 12% per annum with a maturity date of November 4, 2011. The amount of the note represented receipt of $150,000 cash and the assignment of a $100,000 debt owed to the Company’s then sole officer and Director. The Company issued 900,000 shares of restricted common stock in connection with this third party note. The holder of this note agreed to mirror all deferrals and waivers by the Secured Note holders going forward, with forbearance on this note commencing as of January 23, 2014.

On November 4, 2010, a third party loaned the Company $50,000, which was evidenced by a promissory note, bearing interest at the rate of 12% per annum with a maturity date of November 4, 2011. The Company issued the third party an aggregate of 300,000 shares of common stock in connection with this third party note. The holder of this note agreed to mirror all deferrals by the Secured Note holders commencing as of January 2, 2014.

~~In April 2012, four of the Secured Note Holders participated in a non~~F-interest bearing bridge loan for $40,000. The Company issued 400,000 shares of restricted common stock in consideration of this funding. In September 2013, Cynthia S. White, one of the Company’s then directors and a Secured Note Holder converted $10,000 of short-term debt to a $10,000 bridge loan, as disclosed in Note 6 above. The Company issued Ms. White 100,000 shares of restricted common stock in connection with the loan. The Company has satisfied $10,000 of the bridge notes, leaving an outstanding balance of $40,000 at June 30, 2015.8

OnIn ~~August~~April ~~15,~~ 2012, afour ~~third~~of ~~party loaned~~ the ~~Company~~Secured ~~$200,000~~Note ~~for~~Holders ~~working~~participated ~~capital~~in ~~which~~a ~~was~~non-interest ~~evidenced~~bearing bybridge aloan ~~Convertible~~for ~~Promissory Note~~$40,000. The ~~bearing~~Company ~~interest~~issued at400,000 ~~the~~shares ~~rate~~ of ~~10%~~restricted ~~per~~common ~~annum~~stock ~~with~~in aconsideration ~~maturity date~~ of ~~August~~this ~~15, 2014~~funding. ~~The~~ In ~~Convertible~~September ~~Promissory~~2013, ~~Note~~Cynthia isS. ~~convertible~~White, ~~into~~one ~~shares~~ of the Company’s ~~common~~then ~~stock~~directors atand ~~the~~a ~~option~~Secured Note Holder converted $10,000 of ~~the~~short-term ~~holder~~debt atto a ~~conversion~~$10,000 ~~price~~bridge ofloan, $0as disclosed in Note 6 above.08 The ~~per~~Company ~~share~~issued Ms. ~~The~~White ~~holders~~100,000 shares of ~~this~~restricted ~~note~~common ~~agreed~~stock toin ~~extend~~connection with the ~~maturity~~loan. The ~~date~~Company has satisfied $10,000 of the ~~note~~bridge ~~until~~notes, ~~August~~leaving 15an outstanding balance of $40,000 at September 30, 2015.

On ~~December~~August 15, ~~2014~~2012, ~~G. Thomas Lovelace,~~ a ~~Secured~~third ~~Note~~party ~~Holder and a board member of Phoenix Restructuring, Inc.,~~ loaned the Company $55200,000 for working capital which was evidenced by a Convertible Promissory Note., ~~The~~bearing ~~Convertible Note accrues~~ interest at the rate of 10% per annum ~~(14% per annum upon an event of default)~~ with ~~such interest payable monthly and has~~ a maturity date of ~~December~~August 1415, ~~2016~~2014. The Convertible Promissory Note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock ~~from time to time~~ at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $0.08 per share. The ~~Company~~holders isof ~~required~~this note agreed to ~~provide~~extend the ~~holder~~maturity atdate ~~least~~of ~~thirty,~~the ~~but~~note ~~not~~until ~~more~~August ~~than sixty~~15, ~~days~~2015. The ~~prior~~Company ~~notice~~is in ~~the~~current ~~event~~negotiations ~~the~~to ~~Company~~extend ~~desires~~the tomaturity ~~pre-pay~~date of the ~~Convertible Note~~note.

On December 15, 2014, ~~James A~~G. ~~Hendrickson~~Thomas Lovelace, a Secured Note Holder and a board member of Phoenix Restructuring, Inc., loaned the Company $3055,000 which was evidenced by a Convertible Promissory Note. The Convertible Note accrues interest at the rate of 10% per annum (14% per annum upon an event of default) with such interest payable ~~month~~monthly and has a maturity date of December 14, 2016. The Convertible Note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock from time to time at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $0.08 per share. The Company is required to provide the holder at least thirty days, but not more than sixty, days, prior notice in the event the Company desires to pre-pay the Convertible Note.

On December 15, 2014, James A. Hendrickson, a Secured Note Holder, loaned the Company $30,000 which was evidenced by a Convertible Promissory Note. The Convertible Note accrues interest at the rate of 10% per annum (14% per annum upon an event of default) with such interest payable month and has a maturity date of December 14, 2016. The Convertible Note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock from time to time at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $0.08 per share. The Company is required to provide the holder at least thirty days, but not more than sixty days, prior notice in the event the Company desires to pre-pay the Convertible Note.

On March 1, 2015, James A. Hendrickson loaned the Company an additional $25,000 which was evidenced by another Convertible Promissory Note with substantially similar terms as the note described above, but with a maturity date of February 28, 2017.

NOTE 8 – COMMON STOCK

As disclosed in Note 3, Generation Zero issued an aggregate of 24,988,567 shares of common stock to acquire the URL www.find.com and related technology in 2010.

As disclosed in Note 4, Generation Zero issued an aggregate of 11,300,000 shares of restricted common stock in conjunction with the restructure of the management team and for past services rendered to the Company in May 2013.

As disclosed in Note 7, Generation Zero issued an additional 1,050,000 shares of restricted common stock in conjunction with the issuance of third party notes during November 2010, and issued an additional 150,000 shares of restricted common stock in September 2013 to fulfill prior management commitments relating to an extension on one of the third party notes.

As disclosed in Note 7, Generation Zero agreed in April 2012 to issue 1,460,125 shares of restricted common stock pro-rata with the outstanding principal amount of the Secured Notes held by each holder. The Company has issued ~~903~~946,~~669~~773 of these shares to date, leaving ~~556~~513,~~456~~352 shares which have not been physically issued to date and are not included in the number of issued and outstanding shares disclosed throughout this filing.

As disclosed in Note 7, Generation Zero issued the participating Note Holders 500,000 shares of restricted common stock in April 2012 and in September 2013.

F-9

On February 12, 2014, the Company issued 1,900,000 shares of restricted common stock as compensation to current management and for advisory services rendered to the Company as follows: 600,000 shares to Richard M. Morrell, pursuant to the terms of his consulting agreement; 300,000 shares to Cynthia S. White for advisory services; 300,000 shares to Christine B. Cheney and 700,000 shares to Brian Waldo.

Effective January 1, 2014 the Company and Find.com, Inc. entered into agreements with Christine B. Cheney as Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer; and Brian Waldo as Chief Information Officer.

On April 16, 2014, the Company issued 295,000 shares of restricted common stock as compensation to current management and for payment of services rendered to the Company as follows: 135,000 shares to Brian Waldo, pursuant to the terms of his consulting agreement; 60,000 shares to Christine B. Cheney, pursuant to the terms of her consulting agreement; and 100,000 shares to a third party vendor as payment in-lieu of cash.

On June 30, 2014, the Company issued 295,000 shares of restricted common stock as compensation to current management and for payment of services rendered to the Company as follows: 135,000 shares to Brian Waldo, pursuant to the terms of his consulting agreement; 60,000 shares to Christine B. Cheney, pursuant to the terms of her consulting agreement; and 100,000 shares to a third party vendor (reddbug) as payment in-lieu of cash.

On July 22, 2014, the Company issued 600,000 shares of restricted common stock as compensation to Richard M. Morrell, pursuant to the terms of his consulting agreement.

On September 30, 2014, the Company issued 185,000 shares of restricted common stock as compensation to current management and for payment of services rendered to the Company as follows: 90,000 shares to Brian Waldo, pursuant to the terms of his consulting agreement; 45,000 shares to Christine B. Cheney, pursuant to the terms of her consulting agreement; and 50,000 shares to a third party marketing consultant.

On December 31, 2014, the Company issued 195,000 shares of restricted common stock as compensation to management and for the payment of services rendered to the Company as follows: 135,000 to Brian Waldo, pursuant to the terms of his consulting agreement; and 60,000 shares to Christine B. Cheney, pursuant to the terms of her consulting agreement.

On March 31, 2015, the Company issued 1,097,500 shares of restricted common stock as compensation to current management as follows: 467,500 shares to Brian Waldo, pursuant to the terms of his consulting agreement valued at $2,337.50 and 630,000 shares to Christine B. Cheney, pursuant to the terms of her consulting agreement, valued at $3,150.

On April 10, 2015 the Company issued 900,000 shares of restricted common stock to Richard M. Morrell, pursuant to the terms of his consulting agreement, valued at $4,500.

On June 30, 2015 the Company issued 60,000 shares of restricted common stock as compensation to Christine B. Cheney, pursuant to the terms of her consulting agreement, valued at $300.

On June 30, 2015 the Company issued 1,270,000 shares of restricted common stock, valued at $6,350 as compensation to various vendors and consultants working on the Find.com platform.

F-10

NOTE 9 – PREFERRED STOCK

Series A Preferred Stock

Generation Zero has authorized 1,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock which has a par value of $0.001 per share. Each share has no dividend rights, no liquidation preference, and no conversion or redemption rights. The shares of Series A Preferred Stock have the right, voting in aggregate, to vote on all shareholder matters equal to fifty-one percent (51%) of the total vote. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2015, there were 1,000 shares of Series A preferred stock issued and outstanding.

Series B Preferred Stock

Generation Zero has authorized 2,000,000 shares of Series B Preferred Stock which has a par value of $0.001 per share. Each share has no dividend rights, no liquidation preference and no voting rights. The Series B Preferred Stock has a price of $2.50 per share and converts into the Company’s common stock on the basis of one share of Series B Preferred Stock for thirty shares of common stock.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2015, there were no shares of Series B preferred stock issued and outstanding.

NOTE 10 –- SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (unaudited)

F-11

ITEM 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

Statements made in this Form 10-Q that are not historical or current facts are "forward-looking statements". These statements often can be identified by the use of terms such as "may," "will," "expect," "believe," "anticipate," "estimate," "approximate" or "continue," or the negative thereof. We intend that such forward-looking statements be subject to the safe harbors for such statements. We wish to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Any forward-looking statements represent management's best judgment as to what may occur in the future. However, forward-looking statements are subject to risks, uncertainties and important factors beyond our control that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from historical results of operations and events and those presently anticipated or projected. We disclaim any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statement or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events. References in this Form 10-Q, unless another date is stated, are to ~~June~~September 30, 2015.

You should read the matters described in “Risk Factors” below and disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed with the Commission on April 15, 2015, and the other cautionary statements made in this Report as being applicable to all related forward-looking statements wherever they appear in this Report. We cannot assure you that the forward-looking statements in this Report will prove to be accurate and therefore prospective investors are encouraged not to place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Other than as required by law, we undertake no obligation to update or revise these forward-looking statements, even though our situation may change in the future.

Corporate History

Generation Zero Group, Inc. (“we”, “Generation Zero”, the “Company” and “us”) was formed as a Nevada corporation on May 16, 2006 under the name Velocity Oil & Gas, Inc. The Company originally operated as a start-up entity with the intention of being involved in oil and gas exploration and development with a geographic focus in Texas and Louisiana.

Find.com Technology Acquisition

During April 2010, Generation Zero entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement with Find.com Acquisition, Inc. to acquire all of Find.com Acquisition’s interest in and ownership of the technology assets that powered the operations of the www.Find.com website and all associated intellectual property rights necessary to enable Generation Zero to register the technology and intellectual property in Generation Zero’s name. The purchase also included all service contracts related to the operations of the technology that at the time of acquisition related to the operation of www.Find.com, and other related domain names. The purchase did not include any liabilities of Find.com Acquisition or the Find.com Universal Resource Locator or web address “URL”. The Company issued 10,000,000 shares of restricted common stock as purchase consideration. In September 2010, the acquired assets were valued at $1,300,000 based upon a fair market valuation report prepared by a third party valuation specialist.

The Company began pursuing an alternative strategy for the Find.com URL and opportunities for the Company in the last quarter of 2010. Generation Zero as of December 31, 2010 was uncertain as to whether it would be able to utilize the full functionality of the acquired technology assets on future initiatives unrelated to Find.com, and accordingly recorded an impairment charge of ($1,100,000) based on the fact that the timing of any future initiatives was unknown and uncertain. The technology assets, after the impairment charge, were valued at $200,000.

In January 2011, Find.com Acquisition distributed the 10,000,000 shares of Generation Zero’s restricted common stock which it held to its shareholders.

Current management of Generation Zero is in the process of locating the acquired assets to further identify the components, licensed software rights and functionality of the technology assets. Until the discovery and evaluation of the assets can be completed, the Company has determined that a further impairment charge is appropriate and has thus valued the acquired technology assets at $1.

www.Find.com URL (“URL”)

On June 30, 2010 Generation Zero entered into a Share Exchange Agreement with various members of Find.com URL Holding LLC, a Georgia limited liability company. Find.com URL Holding LLC owned 100% of the URL known as www.find.com. The purchase consideration included cash payments at closing, the issuance of 14,988,567 shares of restricted common stock and the issuance of secured notes totaling $3,070,000 (the “Secured Notes” and the holders thereof, the “Secured Note Holders”) bearing interest at the rate of 12% per annum, and having a maturity date of December 31, 2011. The Company’s repayment of the Secured Notes is secured by security agreements providing the Secured Note Holders a security interest in substantially all of the Company’s assets, personal property and URL Holding’s ownership of Find.com. The URL was valued at $4,000,000 based upon a fair market valuation report prepared by a third party valuation specialist. The Company allocated this value to the consideration issued based on the relative fair value of the debt assumed and equity issued related to this purchase. Fair value of the debt was based upon the face value of the instrument while the fair value of the common stock was based on the quoted market price of the stock on June 30, 2010. The secured notes were deeply discounted at the time of the transaction, with the discount amortized over the original term of the notes.

Phoenix Restructuring, Inc. was appointed as the collateral agent for the benefit of the Secured Note Holders under the Security Agreements. Until the Secured Notes are repaid in full, the Collateral Agent has the right to appoint two Managers of URL Holding, solely for the purpose of protecting the collateral securing the Notes. The Collateral Agent, under the direction of the Note Holders, also has the responsibility to negotiate terms of extension or forbearance and represent the interests of the Secured Note Holders in discussions with the Company.

By the end of 2010, the Company had been unsuccessful in raising funds for working capital or in generating significant revenues with Find.com, and began pursuing alternative strategies for the Find.com URL, including potential licensing, joint ventures, and other opportunities for the Company.

The Company did not make the required payments under the Secured Notes to the holders thereof when due. The Collateral Agent for the Secured Notes declared the Secured Notes in default in November 2010. The Company negotiated a Forbearance Agreement with the Secured Note Holders to effect forbearance for four months through March 15, 2011, provided that the Company was not able to repay the Secured Notes on or before March 15, 2011. Subsequently in April 2012, the secured note holders, with over majority approval, authorized the Collateral Agent to forbear in the exercise of its rights and remedies under the Notes, security agreements and applicable law during a Forbearance Period which commenced on June 30, 2010 and was to end on the earlier to occur of January 2, 2014 or the date that any default under the forbearance agreement occurred as described in greater detail below (which date has been extended as described below). The Secured Notes, with an aggregate outstanding balance of $2,920,250, were renegotiated in April 2012 to extend the forbearance period. In addition, all accrued interest on such Secured Notes was forgiven and the Secured Note Holders agreed that the Secured Notes would not accrue interest during the forbearance period.

As a forbearance fee, the Company agreed to issue 1,460,125 shares of restricted common stock pro-rata with the outstanding principal amount of the Secured Notes held by each holder. As of the date of this filing, there are still 556,456 shares which have not been physically issued to date and are not included in the number of issued and outstanding shares disclosed throughout this Report. The April 2012 forbearance extension also provided that all shares issued to the Secured Note Holders from time to time have piggy-back registration rights; the Company could borrow up to $1 million in the form of convertible debt (in addition to up to $50,000 of bridge funding which could be borrowed from the Secured Note Holders, of which a total of $50,000 was subsequently borrowed as discussed below), and that Matthew Krieg (the former officer and Director of the Company), upon execution of default options and with the stipulation that the Company must be current with its SEC filings, would cancel shares of Series A Preferred Stock of the Company providing him super-majority voting rights (the “Series A Shares”) in connection with the conversion of such shares into 3 million shares of common stock (provided that such cancellation and issuance, occurred in May 2013, as described below) and new Series A Shares would then be issued to the assignee of the Collateral Agent. This action provided for the restructure of the Company, the transfer of control from Mr. Krieg and the replacement of management, which transfer of control and replacement of management occurred in May 2013. The Company also agreed to pay the Secured Note Holders up to 25% of the Company’s cash flow in excess of $1 million (in the discretion of the Board of Directors) in any fiscal year that cash flows associated with Find.com exceed $1 million, in connection with the Secured Notes, and the Secured Note Holders agreed to further forbear from taking any action under the Secured Notes and to extend the forbearance period of such notes until January 2, 2014 so long as such requirements were met (which date has subsequently been extended as discussed below). 5

As a forbearance fee, the Company agreed to issue 1,460,125 shares of restricted common stock pro-rata with the outstanding principal amount of the Secured Notes held by each holder. As of the date of this filing, there are still 513,352 shares which have not been physically issued to date and are not included in the number of issued and outstanding shares disclosed throughout this Report. The April 2012 forbearance extension also provided that all shares issued to the Secured Note Holders from time to time have piggy-back registration rights; the Company could borrow up to $1 million in the form of convertible debt (in addition to up to $50,000 of bridge funding which could be borrowed from the Secured Note Holders, of which a total of $50,000 was subsequently borrowed as discussed below), and that Matthew Krieg (the former officer and Director of the Company), upon execution of default options and with the stipulation that the Company must be current with its SEC filings, would cancel shares of Series A Preferred Stock of the Company providing him super-majority voting rights (the “Series A Shares”) in connection with the conversion of such shares into 3 million shares of common stock (provided that such cancellation and issuance, occurred in May 2013, as described below) and new Series A Shares would then be issued to the assignee of the Collateral Agent. This action provided for the restructure of the Company, the transfer of control from Mr. Krieg and the replacement of management, which transfer of control and replacement of management occurred in May 2013. The Company also agreed to pay the Secured Note Holders up to 25% of the Company’s cash flow in excess of $1 million (in the discretion of the Board of Directors) in any fiscal year that cash flows associated with Find.com exceed $1 million, in connection with the Secured Notes, and the Secured Note Holders agreed to further forbear from taking any action under the Secured Notes and to extend the forbearance period of such notes until January 2, 2014 so long as such requirements were met (which date has subsequently been extended as discussed below).

As provided under the negotiated terms of the extended forbearance, a consulting team was engaged to work with Mr. Krieg to facilitate bringing all audits and SEC filings current, to define and develop the infrastructure for a viable platform to monetize the Find.com URL, and to find investment monies to support these initiatives. The Company had completed audits for the years ending December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, and brought its SEC filings current through March 31, 2013 as of May 6, 2013 (provided that the Company has also continued to make timely filings with the SEC since such date). At that time (May 2013), the Secured Note Holders exercised their option to transfer control of the Company from Mr. Krieg and to replace management (See “Change in Control” below).

The new management team negotiated with the Secured Note Holders to further extend the forbearance period of the Secured Notes to January 2, 2015, with an automatic extension to January 2, 2016, unless a majority (by value) of the Secured Note Holders notifies the Company otherwise, provided that the Company did not receive notice from the Secured Note Holders of their intention to not extend the forbearance period and as such the forbearance period was automatically extended to January 2, 2016. The Secured Note Holders may, at any time in which the conditions of the forbearance extension are not met, declare the Secured Notes in default, take action to enforce their security interest in substantially all of the Company’s assets and/or effect a consensual foreclosure and regain control and ownership of URL Holding (and therefore, ownership of the Find.com URL). If this were to occur the Company could be forced to scale back or abandon its business operations altogether.

The Secured Notes have an outstanding balance of $2,920,250 as of the date of this filing and interest on such Secured Notes does not accrue during the forbearance period and has not accrued since approximately June 30, 2010.

Find.com, Inc. (“Find.com”)

The Company is concentrating on building the Find.com URL as an e-commerce marketplace platform. On February 28, 2013, Find.com, Inc. (“Find.com”) was formed as a Nevada corporation, wholly-owned by Find.com URL Holding, LLC (“URL Holding”), a Georgia limited liability company and the owner of the Find.com URL. Find.com is the operational business unit of URL Holding. Find.com monetizes the Find.com URL through partnerships, affiliate networks, direct product sales, and advertising sales.

Effective on August 1, 2013, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, URL Holding, provided a one year (automatically renewable unless notice of termination is provided by either party) license to Find.com to use the Find.com URL, which license was automatically renewed on August 1, 2014 for an additional one year. Pursuant to the terms of the license, Find.com is required to pay 25% of the cash flow in excess of $1 million directly to the Company, which will be used to repay the Secured Notes. The remainder of the funds generated by the Find.com URL is anticipated to be retained by Find.com for operations and business development. 6

OnEffective ~~September~~on 30August 1, 2013, the Company’s ~~agreed~~wholly-owned tosubsidiary, ~~provide~~URL anHolding, ~~inter-company~~provided ~~line~~a ofone ~~credit~~year (automatically renewable unless notice of uptermination tois ~~$250,000~~provided by either party) license to Find.com ~~for~~to ~~working~~use ~~capital~~the Find. Ascom ofURL, ~~the~~which ~~date~~license ofwas ~~this~~most ~~filing~~recently aautomatically ~~total~~renewed ofon ~~$134~~August 1,~~494~~ is2015 ~~outstanding. All~~for ~~advanced~~an ~~amounts~~additional ~~bear~~one ~~interest~~year. Pursuant atto the ~~rate~~terms of 3%the ~~per~~license, ~~annum~~Find.com ~~and~~is ~~are~~required ~~due~~to ~~and~~pay ~~payable~~25% ~~six~~of ~~months~~the ~~from~~cash ~~the~~flow ~~date~~in excess of ~~each~~$1 ~~such~~million ~~advance. Advances~~directly to the Company, which will be used ~~for~~to ~~operation~~repay ~~and~~the ~~business~~Secured ~~development~~Notes. The ~~costs~~remainder ~~related~~of tothe funds generated by the Find.com ~~e-commerce~~URL is anticipated to be retained by Find.com for operations and business development.

On September 30, 2013, the Company agreed to provide an inter-company line of credit of up to $250,000 to Find.com for working capital. As of the date of this filing a total of $89,149 is outstanding. All advanced amounts bear interest at the rate of 3% per annum and are due and payable nine months from the date of each such advance. Advances will be used for operation and business development costs related to the Find.com e-commerce business.

In October 2013, Find.com entered into a publisher’s agreement with SeedCorn, pursuant to which it appointed SeedCorn as its agent for the purpose of selling advertising through the Company’s find.com website. On April 30, 2015 the Company and SeedCorn Advertising, Inc. mutually cancelled and terminated the Publisher Agreement.

On or around December 9, 2014, Find.com entered into a digital marketing agreement with reddbug Group (“reddbug”). Pursuant to the agreement, reddbug agreed to provide Find.com online advertising, marketing services, search engine optimization and other consulting services in connection with Find.com. Find.com agreed to pay a retainer in the amount of $3,150, and to be billed monthly based on actual services provided and replenish the retainer as needed, and with half of future amounts due payable in restricted shares of the Company’s common stock, subject to reddbug meeting applicable exemptions for registration, based on the average daily closing price of the Company’s common stock in the prior quarter. The agreement ~~has~~had a term of twelve months from December 2014 to November 2015, provided that either party may terminate the agreement with thirty days prior written notice in the event of the breach of the agreement by the non-terminating party. reddbug’s partnership with Find.com was expanded in January 2015 to include marketing responsibilities, as well as the technology services previously provided by Mr. Waldo. The relationship with reddbug was subsequently terminated on April 8, 2015. The Company is exploring opportunities with multiple individuals and potential partners to provide these services and will disclose more detailed information as it becomes available.

Description of Business Activities

The Company, including its subsidiaries, operates websites at ~~www.~~generationzerogroup.com, ~~and~~find.com, ~~www~~shopping.find.com, and zeekly.com. Access to SEC filings, press releases and information about the Company and its management team is available at ~~www.~~generationzerogroup.com. The information on, or that may be accessed through, the Company’s websites is not incorporated by reference into this filing and should not be considered a part of this filing.

The Company’s current primary business focus is to monetize ~~the~~ Find.com and associated URL’s.

~~The Company launched the website www.find.com in April 2013 as an affiliate retail shopping site with limited initial functionality. Subsequent accomplishments to date include:~~7

The Company launched the find.com website in April 2013 as an affiliate retail shopping site with limited initial functionality. Subsequent accomplishments to date include:

~~Migration~~Transition ofto Search on the Find.com ~~website~~home ~~to a new platform~~page. The main Find.com ~~has~~website ~~migrated~~is tonow a ~~widely~~comprehensive ~~used~~internet ~~e-commerce~~search ~~and Content Management System (“CMS”) platform, including migrating its hosting to servers that are optimized for this particular platform~~engine. ~~Additional~~Key ~~benefits~~features ~~of utilizing this particular platform~~ include the large community of service providers that offer reasonably priced plugins to add additional functionality without the need to develop that functionality, and the availability of subject-matter expertise specific to this platform.:

Combined web search results from the three major search engines, providing a single source of web search results greater than any individual site

Privacy, including 2048-bit data encryption and no storage of IP addresses, history, or any user-specific information

Thumbnail previews of websites next to each web search result, allowing the user to quickly identify the best results without having to click on each link

Custom search categories, enabling the user to get results not only for traditional web search, but also shopping, news, video, images, and several other types of search—all from a single search entry and without leaving Find.com.

~~Product~~Migration ~~Curation. Although~~of the ~~price comparison shopping product search functionality that has been part of~~ Find.com ~~for~~shopping ~~the~~website ~~past~~to ~~two years continues,~~ shopping.find.com. Find.com Shopping has ~~moved~~migrated to a ~~more~~widely ~~selective~~used ~~approach~~e-commerce ~~for~~and ~~the~~Content ~~products~~Management itSystem ~~offers~~(“CMS”) ~~for~~platform, ~~sale~~including ~~directly. These~~migrating ~~products~~its ~~must~~hosting ~~meet~~to ~~strict~~servers ~~criteria:~~that ~~they~~are ~~must~~optimized befor ~~consistent~~this ~~with~~particular ~~Find~~platform.~~com’s~~ With ~~brand and values, they must be of~~ the ~~highest~~transition ~~quality,~~to ~~and~~Search ~~they~~on ~~must represent~~ the ~~best~~primary ~~prices available anywhere~~Find.com ~~While~~home page, Find.com ~~offers~~Shopping ~~hundreds~~is ofnow ~~thousands~~on ~~of products to choose from through its price comparison network~~shopping.find.com, ~~its~~with ~~selection~~links ofback ~~direct-sale~~and ~~products~~forth isto ~~much~~the ~~more~~Find.com ~~exclusive and will evolve frequently~~homepage.

~~Acquisition~~Addition ~~and Growth~~ of ~~Traffic. Find.com~~a ~~continues~~new tovideo-sharing ~~evaluate sources of quality traffic~~site, ~~and~~Zeekly.com. Users ~~has~~are ~~recently~~able ~~begun~~to ~~acquiring~~create ~~some~~accounts, ~~traffic~~upload ~~primarily~~their ~~through~~own avideos, ~~source~~and ~~that~~link ~~relies~~to content on ~~social~~other ~~networking~~major ~~traffic,~~video ~~but~~sites ~~continues~~such toas ~~monitor~~YouTube ~~it for quality~~ and ~~performance~~Vimeo. ~~Find~~ Zeekly.com’s ~~development~~also ofallows ~~unique~~users ~~content~~to ~~and~~upload ~~its social-networking presence~~images, increate ~~conjunction~~channels ~~with~~and ~~advancements~~groups, incustomize ~~the~~their ~~development~~own ofbackgrounds ~~the~~and ~~Find.com~~page ~~site~~designs, ~~resulted in significant growth in traffic~~ and ~~overall~~share ~~interest~~their inpages ~~the Find.com website during 2014. Traffic levels are expected to increase throughout 2015~~ with ~~the~~invited ~~developments described above, although the focus will be more on quality instead of quantity~~subscribers.

~~Removal~~Creation of ~~Legacy~~new ~~Google~~branding ~~Indexing~~and ~~Penalty.~~design Aelements ~~significant~~to ~~setback~~accommodate ~~identified~~multiple ~~early in the development process was that the Find~~sites.~~com~~ ~~URL~~This ~~was~~includes ~~not~~a ~~indexed~~global ~~on Google due to an algorithmic penalty~~menu, ~~which~~a ~~dated~~new ~~back~~logo tofor ~~earlier developments with the URL under previous management and developers. As of June 2014~~Zeekly, ~~the~~improved ~~Company succeeded in getting the penalty lifted and has had over 15,000 Find~~find.com ~~pages~~logos ~~indexing~~and onnew ~~Google~~favicons. ~~This~~ ~~was~~The acommon ~~critical~~theme ~~accomplishment~~across aslogos itand ~~enabled~~sites ~~Find.com~~is ~~to launch~~ a ~~Search~~colored ~~Engine Optimization (SEO) strategy and removed a barrier to attracting customers, investors and partners~~ellipsis.

Acquisition and Growth of Traffic. Find.com continues to evaluate the best sources of quality traffic, and has recently relied exclusively on organic traffic growth. The additions of Search and Zeekly have resulted in sharp increases in the amount of organic traffic on the site. The Company is in the process of optimizing user experience on these new sites, and adding mechanisms for converting traffic to revenue through such mechanisms as advertisments and partnerships. Traffic levels are expected to continue to increase with the developments described above.

Removal of Legacy Google Indexing Penalty. A significant setback identified early in the development process was that the Find.com URL was not indexed on Google due to an algorithmic penalty, which dated back to earlier developments with the URL under previous management and developers. As of June 2014, the Company succeeded in getting the penalty lifted and now has over 46,000 pages indexing on Google. This was a critical accomplishment as it enabled Find.com to launch a Search Engine Optimization (SEO) strategy and removed a barrier to attracting customers, investors and partners.

Current areas of focus for the management team related to Find.com include:

Fundraising. With core elements of the Find.com strategy in place and as traffic ~~resumes flowing~~ to the website continues to increase, the Company plans to raise additional funding for enhancements such as marketing expertise, site enhancements to optimize user experience and revenue conversion, a mobile app strategy, ~~expansion~~enhancements ofto ~~direct~~the ~~product~~Shopping ~~offerings~~site, and ~~implementation~~expansion of athe ~~marketplace~~blog and other content. The Company will announce further plans related to its business strategy and fundraising goals as they become available.

Development of key partnerships. AtThe ~~the~~ Company’ recently initiated a Request for Proposal (RFP) process to identify development partner(s). Resulting proposals will be used to develop fundraising documents and materials with which to approach potential investors. At the current stage of development, the right ~~partnerships~~partnership(s) allow Find.com to gain expertise instantly, increase development bandwidth, minimize fixed costs, and move nimbly to capture consumer and industry changes—without unnecessarily increasing ongoing administrative and overhead costs. The Company currently works with a number of individual vendors and consultants~~, and is preparing a Request For Proposal (RFP) to identify a key development partner for the expansion of Find~~.~~com.~~

RESULTS FROM OPERATIONS (unaudited)

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2015 COMPARED TO THE THREE MONTHS ENDED ~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2014

We generated revenues of $12,~~840~~536 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2015, compared to revenues of $4214,~~766~~132 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014. Revenues were generated through our subsidiary Find.com and decreased due to decreased traffic to the website as a result of the untimely death of our publisher partner.

The Company had cost of sales of $4,~~156~~697 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2015, compared to no cost of sales of $1,815 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014. The increase in cost of sales relates to the purchase of traffic and purchase of products sold on the Find.com shopping site.

We had general and administrative expenses of $5957,~~456~~577 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2015, compared to general and administrative expenses of $~~120~~66,~~993~~376 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014, a decrease of $618,~~537~~799 ~~or 51%~~ from the prior period. The decrease in general and administrative expenses was mainly due to lower legal expenses incurred in defending the Company against the Geronimo lawsuit (described below in “Part II”-“Item 1. Legal Proceedings”) and lower Find.com development expenses.

We had $66,667 in amortization expense for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2015 and 2014. Amortization expenses are related to the acquisition of the Find.com assets in fiscal 2010.

We had total operating expenses of $~~126~~124,~~123~~244 and a total operating loss of $~~128~~126,~~438~~405 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2015, compared to total operating expenses of $~~187~~133,~~660~~043 and a total operating loss of $~~144~~120,~~894~~726 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014. The decrease in total operating expenses of $618,~~537~~799 and ~~decrease~~increase in operating loss of $165,~~456~~679 from the prior period is due to the reasons stated above.

We had interest expense of $2524,~~183~~101 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2015, compared to interest expense of $311,~~667~~889 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014. This increase in interest expense of $2112,~~516~~212 from the prior period was in connection with interest accrued on convertible notes as described below.

We had a total net loss of $~~153~~150,~~621~~506 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2015, compared to a total net loss of $~~148~~132,~~561~~615 for the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014. This increase in net loss of $517,~~060~~891 from the prior period was mainly due to the increase in interest expenses as described above and the decrease in revenues.

~~FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 COMPARED TO THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014~~9

WeFOR ~~generated~~THE ~~revenues~~NINE ofMONTHS ~~$7,528~~ENDED ~~for~~SEPTEMBER ~~the six months ended June~~ 30, 2015, ~~compared~~COMPARED toTO ~~revenues~~THE ofNINE ~~$51,217~~MONTHS ~~for~~ENDED ~~the~~SEPTEMBER ~~six months ended June~~ 30, 2014~~. Revenues were generated through our subsidiary Find.com and decreased due to decreased traffic to the website as a result of the untimely death of our publisher partner.~~

~~The~~We ~~Company~~generated ~~had~~revenues ~~cost~~ of ~~sales of~~ $610,~~871~~065 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2015, compared to norevenues ~~cost~~ of ~~sales~~$65,350 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014. Revenues were generated through our subsidiary Find.com and decreased due to decreased traffic to the website as a result of the untimely death of our publisher partner.

WeThe Company had ~~general~~cost ~~and~~of ~~administrative~~sales ~~expenses~~ of $~~169~~11,~~518~~568 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2015, compared to ~~general~~cost ~~and~~of ~~administrative~~sales ~~expenses~~ of $~~158~~1,~~664~~815 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014~~, an increase of $10,854 or 7% from the prior period~~. The increase in ~~general~~cost ~~and~~of ~~administrative~~sales ~~expenses~~relates ~~was mainly due~~ to ~~legal expenses incurred in defending~~ the ~~Company~~purchase ~~against~~of ~~the~~traffic ~~Geronimo~~and ~~lawsuit~~purchase ~~(described~~of ~~below~~products insold ~~“Part~~on ~~II”-“Item~~the 1Find.com ~~Legal~~shopping ~~Proceedings”) and registration with the OTCQB Market~~site.

We had ~~$133,333~~general inand ~~amortization~~administrative ~~expense~~expenses of $227,096 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2015, compared to general and administrative expenses of $225,039 for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, an increase of $2,057 from the prior period. ~~Amortization~~ The increase in general and administrative expenses ~~are~~was ~~related~~mainly due to legal expenses incurred in defending the ~~acquisition~~Company ofagainst the ~~Find.com~~Geronimo ~~assets~~lawsuit (described below in ~~fiscal~~“Part ~~2010~~II”-“Item 1. Legal Proceedings”) and registration with the OTCQB Market.

We had ~~total operating expenses of~~ $~~302~~200,~~852~~000 ~~and~~in aamortization ~~total~~expense ~~operating loss of $302,194~~ for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2015, ~~compared to total operating expenses of $291,997~~ and ~~a total operating loss of $240,780 for the six months ended June 30,~~ 2014. Amortization ~~The increase in total operating~~ expenses ofare ~~$10,855~~related ~~and~~to ~~increase~~the inacquisition ~~operating loss~~ of ~~$61,414 from~~ the ~~prior~~Find.com ~~period~~assets isin ~~due~~fiscal ~~to the reasons stated above~~2010.

We had ~~interest~~total ~~expense~~operating expenses of $48427,~~542~~096 and a total operating loss of $428,599 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2015, compared to ~~interest~~total ~~expense~~operating expenses of $20425,~~072~~039 and a total operating loss of $361,504 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014. ~~This~~The increase in ~~interest~~total ~~expense~~operating expenses of $282,~~470~~057 ~~from~~and ~~the~~increase ~~prior~~in ~~period~~operating ~~was~~loss inof ~~connection~~$67,095 ~~with~~from ~~interest~~the ~~accrued~~prior onperiod ~~convertible~~is ~~notes~~due asto ~~described~~the ~~below~~reasons stated above.

We had ainterest ~~total~~expense ~~net loss~~ of $~~350~~72,~~737~~643 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2015, compared to ainterest ~~total~~expense ~~net loss~~ of $~~260~~31,~~852~~961 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2014. This increase in ~~net~~interest ~~loss~~expense of $8940,~~885~~682 from the prior period was ~~mainly~~in ~~due~~connection towith ~~the~~interest ~~increase~~accrued inon ~~interest~~convertible ~~expenses~~notes as described ~~above and the decrease in revenues~~below.

We had a total net loss of $501,242 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, compared to a total net loss of $393,465for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. This increase in net loss of $107,777 from the prior period was mainly due to the increase in interest expenses as described above and the decrease in revenues.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES (unaudited)

We had total assets of $2,~~885~~828,~~533~~951, as of ~~June~~September 30, 2015, consisting of intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization, of $2,~~881~~827,~~801~~019 (relating to the Find.com URL) and total current assets of $31,~~732~~932, consisting solely of cash.

We had total liabilities of $4,~~396~~490,~~307~~188 as of ~~June~~September 30, 2015. This consisted of current liabilities totaling $4,~~111~~205,~~307~~188 consisting of $~~197~~223,~~214~~009 of accounts payable, $~~165~~190,~~929~~955 of accrued expenses, $~~454~~497,~~157~~217 due to related party debt (of which $~~228~~272,~~996~~056 was owed to Richard M. Morrell, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and sole Director, $171,243 was owed to Cynthia S. White, the Company’s former officer and Director in connection with certain loans made to the Company as described below, and $53,918 was due to Phoenix Restructuring, Inc., collateral agent for the Secured Note Holders),and $3,294,007 of third party notes payable consisting of $2,764,007 due to the third party Secured Note Holders and $530,000 due to third party note holders. We had non-current liabilities totaling $285,000 as of ~~June~~September 30, 2015 consisting of $285,000 of long-term notes payable, of which $100,000 was owed to Richard M. Morrell, the Company’s sole Director and Chief Executive Officer; $75,000 was owed to Thomas M. Cheney, spouse of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer; and $110,000 was owed to third parties, as described below.

We had a working capital deficit of $4,107,575 and a total deficit accumulated during the development stage of $8,234,027 as of June 30, 2015. We incurred a net loss of $153,621 for the three months ended June 30, 2015. These conditions raise substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. Management is trying to raise additional capital through sales of common and preferred stock. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.10

We had ~~$108,550~~a working capital deficit of ~~net~~$4,203,257 ~~cash~~and ~~used~~a intotal ~~operating~~deficit ~~activities~~accumulated ~~for~~during the ~~six~~development ~~months~~stage ~~ended~~of ~~June 30~~$8, ~~2015~~384,532 ~~which~~as ~~was~~of ~~mainly~~September ~~due~~30, to2015. We incurred a net loss of $~~350~~150,~~737~~506 ~~offset~~for bythe ~~$133~~three months ended September 30,~~333~~ of2015. These ~~accrued~~conditions ~~amortization~~raise ofsubstantial ~~intangible~~doubt ~~assets,~~as ~~$75,259~~to ofour ~~increase~~ability into ~~accounts~~continue ~~payable,~~as ~~$5,461~~a ofgoing ~~increase~~concern. Management inis ~~accrued~~trying ~~liabilities,~~to raise additional capital through sales of common and preferred stock. The ~~issued~~financial ~~valued~~statements atdo ~~$28,133~~not ~~for~~include ~~services~~any ~~rendered~~adjustments tothat might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

We had $~~105~~144,~~496~~989 of net cash ~~provided~~used byin ~~financing~~operating activities for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2015, which was mainly due to a net loss of $80501,~~496~~242 ofoffset ~~short-term~~by ~~funding~~$200,000 ~~from~~of ~~Richard~~accrued ~~Morrell~~amortization ~~and~~of intangible assets, $25101,~~000~~055 of ~~proceeds~~increase ~~from~~in ~~issuance~~accounts payable, $30,488 of ~~debt~~increase ~~instruments~~in toaccrued ~~third~~liabilities, ~~parties~~and ~~(see~~stock ~~below)~~issued valued at $24,710 for services rendered to the Company.

OnWe ~~November~~had 4$152,021 ~~2010,~~of anet ~~third~~cash ~~party~~provided ~~loaned~~by ~~the~~financing ~~Company~~activities ~~$150,000,~~for ~~which~~the ~~was~~nine ~~evidenced~~months byended aSeptember ~~promissory~~30, ~~note~~2015, inwhich ~~the~~was ~~amount~~due ofto $~~250~~123,~~000~~556 ~~bearing interest at the rate~~ of ~~12%~~short-term ~~per~~funding ~~annum~~from ~~with~~Richard ~~a maturity date of November 4~~Morrell, ~~2011. The amount of the note represented receipt of~~ $~~150~~25,000 ~~cash~~of ~~and~~proceeds ~~the~~from ~~assignment~~issuance of ~~$100,000 of~~ debt ~~owed~~instruments to ~~the Company’s then sole officer and Director. The Company issued 900,000 shares of restricted common stock in connection with this~~ third ~~party~~parties ~~note. Forbearance has been extended on the note mirroring the forbearance extension and waiver of interest accrual of the Secured Notes~~ (~~described~~see below)~~. As of June 30~~, ~~2014~~ and ~~2015,~~additional apaid ~~total~~in capital of $~~362~~3,~~490~~465 ~~and~~from ~~$361,722~~issuance ~~respectively,~~of ~~including~~common ~~accrued~~stock ~~and unpaid interest thereon, was owed on this note~~.

On November 4, 2010, a third party loaned the Company $50150,000, which was evidenced by a promissory note in the amount of $250,000 bearing interest at the rate of 12% per annum with a maturity date of November 4, 2011. The ~~Company~~amount ~~issued~~of the ~~third~~note ~~party~~represented anreceipt ~~aggregate~~of $150,000 cash and the assignment of ~~300~~$100,000 of debt owed to the Company’s then sole officer and Director. The Company issued 900,000 shares of restricted common stock in connection with this third party note. Forbearance has been extended on the note mirroring the ~~Secured Note~~ forbearance extension and waiver of interest accrual of the Secured Notes (described below). As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2015, a total of $74361,~~430~~722 and $81361,~~746~~722 respectively, including accrued and unpaid interest thereon, was owed on this note.

~~The~~On ~~Company was not able to meet the terms of a Forbearance Agreement entered into with the Secured Note Holders in~~ November ~~2010 (which required among other things~~4, ~~the repayment of the Notes by March 15~~2010, ~~2011)~~a ~~and~~third inparty ~~March~~loaned ~~2012,~~ the ~~Secured Note Holders, with majority approval and the~~ Company ~~entered into a First Addendum to Forbearance Agreement (the “First Addendum”). Pursuant to the First Addendum~~$50, ~~the Note Holders authorized the Collateral Agent to forbear in the exercise of its rights and remedies under the Notes~~000, ~~security~~which ~~agreement~~was ~~securing~~evidenced ~~the~~by ~~Notes, Forbearance Agreement and applicable law during~~ a ~~forbearance~~promissory ~~period commencing on June 30~~note, ~~2010~~bearing ~~and~~interest ~~ending~~at on the ~~earlier~~rate ~~to occur~~ of ~~(a)~~12% ~~January~~per 2,annum ~~2014~~with ora ~~(b)~~maturity ~~the~~ date ~~that any default (other than relating to the payment~~ of ~~funds~~November ~~under~~4, ~~the Notes) occurs (the “Extended Forbearance Period”~~2011.) ~~Pursuant~~The toCompany ~~the~~issued ~~First Addendum,~~ the ~~Notes~~third ~~were~~party ~~renegotiated~~an toaggregate ~~represent a face value~~ of $2300,~~920,250. Accrued~~000 ~~interest was forgiven and no interest accrues on the Notes during the Extended Forbearance Period. As a forbearance fee, the Company agreed to issue 1,460,125~~ shares of ~~restricted~~ common stock ~~pro-rata~~in connection with ~~the~~this ~~outstanding~~third ~~principal~~party ~~amount of the Notes held by each holder~~note. AForbearance ~~total~~has ~~of 556,456 of these shares have not~~ been ~~physically~~extended ~~issued~~on ~~to date and are not included in~~ the ~~number~~note ofmirroring ~~issued and outstanding shares disclosed throughout this filing. Further terms of~~ the ~~Forbearance~~Secured ~~Agreement~~Note ~~were not met by January 2, 2014. The~~ forbearance ~~has~~extension ~~subsequently~~(described ~~been extended to January 2, 2016~~below). As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2015, a total of $276,~~920~~685 and $84,~~250~~223 ~~was~~respectively, ~~owed~~including onaccrued ~~these~~and ~~notes~~unpaid atinterest ~~the~~thereon, ~~end~~was ofowed ~~both~~on ~~time~~this ~~periods~~note.

~~Note~~The ~~Holders~~Company ~~provided~~was not able to meet the ~~Company~~terms ~~non-interest~~of ~~bearing~~a ~~bridge~~Forbearance ~~loans~~Agreement inentered into with the ~~aggregate~~Secured ~~amount~~Note Holders in November 2010 (which required among other things, the repayment of ~~$50~~the Notes by March 15,~~000~~ 2011) and in March 2012, ~~with~~the aSecured ~~maturity~~Note ~~date~~Holders, ofwith majority approval and the ~~earlier~~Company ofentered (into a First Addendum to Forbearance Agreement (the “First Addendum”). Pursuant to the ~~date~~First Addendum, the ~~Company~~Note ~~receives~~Holders ~~aggregate~~authorized ~~funding~~the ~~from~~Collateral ~~any~~Agent ~~source~~to forbear in ~~excess~~the exercise of ~~$50~~its rights and remedies under the Notes,~~000~~ security agreement securing the Notes, Forbearance Agreement and applicable law during a forbearance period commencing on June 30, 2010 and ending on the earlier to occur of (ba) January 2, 2014 or (~~“Bridge~~b) the date that any default (other than relating to the payment of funds under the Notes”) occurs (the “Extended Forbearance Period”.) ~~The~~Pursuant ~~Company~~to isthe ~~currently~~First inAddendum, the ~~process~~Notes were renegotiated to represent a face value of ~~obtaining~~$2,920,250. Accrued ~~waivers~~interest was forgiven and anno ~~extension~~interest ~~from~~accrues on the ~~Note~~Notes ~~holders~~during inthe ~~order~~Extended toForbearance ~~allow~~Period. As a forbearance fee, the Company agreed to ~~raise~~issue ~~additional~~1,460,125 ~~funding~~shares ~~for~~of ~~working~~restricted ~~capital~~common ~~purposes.~~stock Inpro-rata ~~consideration~~with ~~for~~the ~~providing~~outstanding principal amount of the ~~loan~~Notes held by each holder. A total of 513,352 ~~the~~of ~~Company~~these shares have not been physically issued ~~the~~to ~~participating~~date ~~Note~~and ~~Holders~~are annot ~~aggregate~~included in the number of ~~500,000~~issued and outstanding shares disclosed throughout this filing. Further terms of ~~restricted~~the ~~common~~Forbearance ~~stock~~Agreement were not met by January 2, 2014. The forbearance has subsequently been extended to January 2, 2016. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and 2015, a total of $502,~~000 and $40~~920,~~000~~250 ~~respectively~~ was owed on these ~~non-interest~~notes ~~bearing~~at ~~notes~~the end of both time periods.

OnThe ~~August 15, 2012, the~~ Company ~~issued~~owed ~~a subordinated Convertible Promissory Note to John Strickland and Kimberly Ann Griffith~~Scientigo, ~~joint~~Inc. ~~tenants, in the amount of~~ $~~200~~155,000. ~~The~~as ~~Convertible~~part ~~Promissory~~of ~~Note accrues interest at~~ the ~~rate~~Find.com ofURL ~~10%~~transaction ~~per~~referenced ~~annum (payable monthly in arrears) and was due and payable on August 15, 2014~~above. The ~~maturity~~Company ~~date~~made ~~has~~payments ~~been~~of ~~extended~~$100,000 to ~~August 15, 2015~~Scientigo. The ~~Convertible~~note ~~Promissory~~was ~~Note~~assumed isby ~~convertible~~Phoenix ~~into~~Restructuring, ~~shares of the Company’s common stock at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $0~~Inc.08 ~~per~~in ~~share~~2011. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and ~~June 30,~~ 2015, there was $~~200~~53,~~000~~918 ~~outstanding~~owed on this ~~Convertible Promissory Note respectively~~note.

In May 2013, the Company borrowed $5,000 from its then sole officer and Director, Cynthia S. White, for working capital specific to the Find.com operations. Ms. White loaned the Company an additional $10,000 in June 2013 for working capital specific to the Find.com operations. The amount loaned does not bear interest and is due on demand with 90 days’ notice. In September 2013, $10,000 of the loan was converted to a Bridge Note (see above). As of June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2015, there was $5,000 owed to Ms. White as a related party.11

OnNote ~~July~~Holders ~~11,~~provided ~~2013, Mr. Morrell loaned~~ the Company ~~$25,000,~~non-interest ~~which~~bearing ~~was~~bridge ~~evidenced~~loans byin athe ~~Convertible~~aggregate ~~Promissory~~amount ~~Note.~~of ~~The~~$50,000, ~~Convertible~~with ~~Note~~a ~~accrues~~maturity ~~interest~~date atof the ~~rate~~earlier of ~~10%~~(a) ~~per~~the ~~annum~~date ~~(14%~~the ~~per~~Company ~~annum~~receives ~~upon~~aggregate anfunding ~~event~~from ofany ~~default)~~source ~~with~~in ~~such~~excess ~~interest~~of ~~payable~~$50,000 ~~monthly~~ and ~~has~~(b) aJanuary ~~maturity~~2, ~~date~~2014 of(“Bridge ~~July 10, 2015~~Notes”). The ~~Convertible~~Company ~~Note~~ is ~~convertible~~currently ~~into~~in ~~shares of~~ the ~~Company’s~~process ~~common~~of ~~stock~~obtaining ~~from~~waivers ~~time~~and toan ~~time~~extension atfrom the ~~option~~Note ofholders ~~Mr.~~in ~~Morrell~~order atto aallow ~~conversion~~the ~~price~~Company ofto ~~$0.08~~raise ~~per~~additional ~~share. The~~funding ~~Company~~for isworking ~~required~~capital topurposes. ~~provide~~In ~~Mr.~~consideration ~~Morrell~~for atproviding ~~least~~the ~~thirty~~loan, ~~but~~the ~~not~~Company ~~more~~issued ~~than~~the ~~sixty,~~participating ~~days~~Note ~~prior~~Holders ~~notice~~an inaggregate ~~the~~of ~~event~~500,000 ~~the~~shares ~~Company~~of ~~desires~~restricted tocommon ~~pre-pay the Convertible Note~~stock. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and ~~June 30,~~ 2015, ~~there~~a ~~was~~total of $2550,000 ~~owed~~and on$40,000 ~~this~~respectively ~~Convertible~~was ~~Promissory Note~~ owed toon athese ~~related~~non-interest ~~party~~bearing notes.

On ~~December~~August 615, ~~2013~~2012, ~~Mr.~~the ~~Morrell~~Company ~~loaned~~issued ~~the~~a ~~Company~~subordinated ~~$100,000,~~Convertible ~~which~~Promissory ~~was~~Note ~~evidenced~~to byJohn aStrickland ~~Convertible~~and ~~Promissory~~Kimberly ~~Note~~Ann Griffith, joint tenants, in the amount of $200,000. The Convertible Promissory Note accrues interest at the rate of 10% per annum (~~14%~~payable ~~per~~monthly ~~annum~~in ~~upon an event of default~~arrears) ~~with~~and ~~such~~was ~~interest~~due and payable ~~monthly~~on ~~and~~August ~~has~~15, a2014. The maturity date ofwas ~~November~~extended 30to August 15, 2015. Management is currently negotiating a further extension of the maturity date. The Convertible Promissory Note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock ~~from time to time~~ at the option of ~~Mr.~~the ~~Morrell~~holder at a conversion price of $0.08 per share. ~~The~~ ~~Company is required to provide Mr. Morrell at least thirty, but not more than sixty, days prior notice in the event the Company desires to pre-pay the Convertible Note.~~ As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and ~~June~~September 30, 2015, there was $~~100~~200,000 ~~owed~~and $205,042 outstanding on this Convertible Promissory Note ~~owed to a related party~~respectively.

OnIn ~~July~~May 12013, ~~2014, Mr. Morrell loaned~~ the Company borrowed $~~100~~5,000, ~~which~~from ~~was~~its ~~evidenced~~then bysole aofficer ~~Convertible~~and ~~Promissory~~Director, ~~Note~~Cynthia S. ~~The~~ ~~Convertible~~White, ~~Note~~for ~~accrues~~working ~~interest~~capital atspecific to the ~~rate~~Find.com ofoperations. Ms. ~~10%~~White ~~per~~loaned ~~annum~~the ~~(14%~~Company ~~per annum upon~~ an ~~event~~additional of$10,000 ~~default)~~in ~~with such interest payable monthly and has a maturity date of~~ June ~~30,~~2013 ~~2016. The~~for ~~Convertible~~working ~~Note~~capital isspecific ~~convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock from time~~ to ~~time at~~ the ~~option~~Find.com ~~of Mr~~operations. The ~~Morrell~~amount atloaned adoes ~~conversion~~not ~~price~~bear ofinterest ~~$0.08~~and ~~per~~is ~~share. The~~due ~~Company~~on isdemand ~~required~~with to90 ~~provide~~days’ Mrnotice. ~~Morrell~~In atSeptember ~~least thirty~~2013, ~~but not more than sixty~~$10,000 ~~days~~of ~~prior notice in~~ the ~~event~~loan ~~the~~was ~~Company~~converted ~~desires~~ to ~~pre-pay~~a ~~the~~Bridge ~~Convertible~~ Note. (see above). As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2015, there was $~~100~~5,000 ~~outstanding~~owed onto ~~this~~Ms. ~~Convertible~~White ~~Promissory~~as ~~Note owed to~~ a related party.

On ~~October~~July 1011, ~~2014~~2013, ~~Thomas M~~Mr. ~~Cheney,~~Morrell ~~spouse of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer,~~ loaned the Company $7525,000, which was evidenced by a Convertible Promissory Note. The Convertible Note accrues interest at the rate of 10% per annum (14% per annum upon an event of default) with such interest payable monthly and ~~has~~had an original a maturity date of ~~October~~July 910, ~~2016~~2015. Management is currently negotiating a further extension of the maturity date.. The Convertible Note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock from time to time at the option of Mr. ~~Cheney~~Morrell at a conversion price of $0.08 per share. The Company is required to provide Mr. ~~Cheney~~Morrell at least thirty days, but not more than sixty, days, prior notice in the event the Company desires to pre-pay the Convertible Note. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2015, there was $7525,000 ~~outstanding~~and $25,630 owed on this Convertible Promissory Note owed to a related party.

On December 156, ~~2014~~2013, GMr. ~~Thomas~~Morrell ~~Lovelace, a Secured Note Holder and a board member of Phoenix Restructuring,~~ loaned the Company $55100,000, which was evidenced by a Convertible Promissory Note. The Convertible Note accrues interest at the rate of 10% per annum (14% per annum upon an event of default) with such interest payable monthly and has a maturity date of ~~December~~November 1430, ~~2016~~2015. Management is currently negotiating a further extension of the maturity date. The Convertible Note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock from time to time at the option of ~~the~~Mr. ~~holder~~Morrell at a conversion price of $0.08 per share. The Company is required to provide ~~the~~Mr. ~~holder~~Morrell at least thirty days, but not more than sixty, days, prior notice in the event the Company desires to pre-pay the Convertible Note. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2014 and September 30, 2015, there was $55100,000 ~~outstanding~~and $102,521 owed on this Convertible Promissory Note owed to a related party.

On ~~December~~July 151, 2014, ~~James A~~Mr. ~~Hendrickson,~~Morrell ~~a Secured Note Holder,~~ loaned the Company $30100,000, which was evidenced by a Convertible Promissory Note. The Convertible Note accrues interest at the rate of 10% per annum (14% per annum upon an event of default) with such interest payable ~~month~~monthly and has a maturity date of ~~December~~June 1430, 2016. The Convertible Note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock from time to time at the option of ~~the~~Mr. ~~holder~~Morrell at a conversion price of $0.08 per share. The Company is required to provide ~~the~~Mr. ~~holder~~Morrell at least thirty days, but not more than sixty days, prior notice in the event the Company desires to pre-pay the Convertible Note. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2015, there was $30100,000 and $102,521 outstanding on this Convertible Promissory Note owed to a related party.

On March 1, 2015, James A. Hendrickson loaned the Company an additional $25,000 which was evidenced by another Convertible Promissory Note (with substantially similar terms as the December 15, 2014 note described above) that has a maturity date of February 28, 2017. As of June 30, 2015, there was $25,000 outstanding on this Convertible Promissory Note.12

On October 10, 2014, Thomas M. Cheney, spouse of the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, loaned the Company $75,000, which was evidenced by a Convertible Promissory Note. The Convertible Note accrues interest at the rate of 10% per annum (14% per annum upon an event of default) with such interest payable monthly and has a maturity date of October 9, 2016. The Convertible Note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock from time to time at the option of Mr. Cheney at a conversion price of $0.08 per share. The Company is required to provide Mr. Cheney at least thirty days, but not more than sixty days, prior notice in the event the Company desires to pre-pay the Convertible Note. As of September 30, 2015, there was $76,891 outstanding on this Convertible Promissory Note owed to a related party.

On December 15, 2014, G. Thomas Lovelace, a Secured Note Holder and a board member of Phoenix Restructuring, loaned the Company $55,000, which was evidenced by a Convertible Promissory Note. The Convertible Note accrues interest at the rate of 10% per annum (14% per annum upon an event of default) with such interest payable monthly and has a maturity date of December 14, 2016. The Convertible Note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock from time to time at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $0.08 per share. The Company is required to provide the holder at least thirty days, but not more than sixty days, prior notice in the event the Company desires to pre-pay the Convertible Note. As of September 30, 2015, there was $56,386 outstanding on this Convertible Promissory Note.

On December 15, 2014, James A. Hendrickson, a Secured Note Holder, loaned the Company $30,000, which was evidenced by a Convertible Promissory Note. The Convertible Note accrues interest at the rate of 10% per annum (14% per annum upon an event of default) with such interest payable month and has a maturity date of December 14, 2016. The Convertible Note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock from time to time at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $0.08 per share. The Company is required to provide the holder at least thirty, but not more than sixty days prior notice in the event the Company desires to pre-pay the Convertible Note. As of September 30, 2015, there was $30,756 outstanding on this Convertible Promissory Note.

On March 1, 2015, James A. Hendrickson loaned the Company an additional $25,000 which was evidenced by another Convertible Promissory Note (with substantially similar terms as the December 15, 2014 note described above) that has a maturity date of February 28, 2017. As of September 30, 2015, there was $25,630 outstanding on this Convertible Promissory Note.

As of the date of this filing, the Company owes $2,920,250 to the Secured Note Holders in connection with the acquisition of Find.com, the payment of which is secured by a security interest in substantially all of our assets. The Company is in default in connection with the payment of the Notes, however, The Secured Note Holders have agreed to forbear from taking any action in connection with the defaults, subject to certain conditions and exceptions, until January 2, 2016.

We do not currently have any formal commitments or identified sources of additional capital from third parties or from our officers, Director or any shareholders. We can provide no assurance that additional financing will be available on favorable terms, if at all. If sufficient revenues are not generated to support operations, and we are not able to raise the capital necessary to continue our business operations, we may be forced to abandon or curtail our business plan and/or suspend our activities.

In the future, we may be required to seek additional capital by selling additional debt or equity securities, selling assets, if any, or otherwise be required to bring cash flows in balance when we approach a condition of cash insufficiency. The sale of additional equity or debt securities, if accomplished, may result in dilution to the Company’s then shareholders. The Company provides no assurance that financing will be available in amounts or on terms acceptable to the Company, or at all.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Pursuant to Item 305(e) of Regulation S-K (§ 229.305(e)), the Company is not required to provide the information required by this Item as it is a “smaller reporting company,” as defined by Rule 229.10(f)(1).

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Management’s evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures

The Company’s management, with the participation of its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objective of the control system are met. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs. Due to the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of error or fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected.

Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management concluded that its disclosure controls and procedures over financial reporting were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that are filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during its most recent fiscal quarter that materially affected, or were reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting.

Part II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

From time to time, the Company may become party to litigation or other legal proceedings that it considers to be a part of the ordinary course of business. The Company is not currently involved in legal proceedings that could reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on its business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations except as set forth below. The Company may become involved in material legal proceedings in the future.

On February 12, 2013, Geronimo Property Trust (“Geronimo”) filed a lawsuit against the Company, MedicalWork and StaffMD in the Superior Court of Fulton County, Georgia (File No. 2013CV227180), alleging breach of contract by the Company and MedicalWork, due to the Company’s and MedicalWork’s alleged failure to repay a $250,000 Secured Note ( the “Geronimo Note”); unjust enrichment against MedicalWork and StaffMD; fraud against the Company due to alleged breaches of representations made by the Company; and seeking recovery of damages and attorneys’ fees. The suit also sought to enjoin the Company from selling Find.com. The suit claimed that Geronimo never agreed to extend the due date of the Geronimo Note from February 1, 2012 to February 1, 2013 and that a total of approximately $357,500 was due pursuant to the Geronimo Note (including $250,000 of principal, $75,500 of interest and $32,000 of late charges.) Geronimo also alleged that it sent the Company a default notice relating to the Geronimo Note on February 9, 2012, provided that the Company never received such notice. The Geronimo Note had a security interest only in the MedicalWork assets, which are no longer owned by the Company. Jeffrey Sisk has agreed to indemnify the Company from all costs and damages associated from any claims or judgment associated with the Geronimo Note.

On December 13, 2013, Geronimo was awarded a judgment specifically against the Company in the amount of $386,950 with an interest rate of 24%, ignoring the other defendants in the lawsuit.

Our shareholders and Note Holders encouraged management to appeal this judgment. On January 10, 2014, the Company filed an appeal of the judgment.

The Company prevailed in a Motion to Supplement the Record which added substantive additional information to the file that was sent to the Appeals Court. On September 26, 2014, the Appeals Court remanded the case to the Trial Court for review and subsequent determination. Effective February 18, 2015, the Trial Court granted the Company’s Motion to Set Aside the Judgment.

Additionally, as a result of discoveries made during investigation efforts associated with the Geronimo Judgment appeal (specifically relating to events from 2010 and 2011 surrounding the Medical Work/StaffMD transactions), on April 29, 2014, the Company filed a Complaint, Civil Action #2014 cv 245686 in the Superior Court of Fulton County, in the State of Georgia, against various defendants in connection with the matters set forth in the Geronimo lawsuit. Pursuant to the Complaint, the Company is pursuing damages which the Company believes were caused by Emanuel Fialkow, Stacey Fialkow, Valerie McLellan and corporate entities they control (collectively, the "Fialkow Entities") acting directly and in concert with others. The Company asserts that during the period of 2010 through 2011 the Fialkow Entities misappropriated money, corporate opportunities, stock and other assets from the Company and its then wholly-owned subsidiary, MedicalWork, LLC, and further breached contractual obligations to the Company and its then wholly-owned subsidiary. As part of the Motion to Set Aside recently granted on the Geronimo Judgment, the Geronimo lawsuit was combined with this new litigation into one combined case going forward.

The Complaint filed by the Company outlines the actions and injuries uncovered thus far by the Company’s investigation and the Company intends to pursue all legal remedies available to it in connection with such Complaint. At this very early stage of the litigation, the outcome cannot be predicted with any degree of reasonable certainty; however the Company intends to vigorously assert its legal rights against damages caused.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed with the Commission on April 14, 2015, and investors are encouraged to review such risk factors prior to making an investment in the Company.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On March 1, 2015, James Hendrickson, a Secured Note Holder, loaned the Company $25,000 which was evidenced by a Convertible Promissory Note. The Convertible Note accrues interest at the rate of 10% per annum (14% per annum upon an event of default) with such interest payable month and has a maturity date of February 28, 2017. The Convertible Note is convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock from time to time at the option of the holder at a conversion price of $0.08 per share. The Company is required to provide the holder at least thirty, but not more than sixty days prior notice in the event the Company desires to pre-pay the Convertible Note.

On March 31, 2015, the Company issued 1,097,500 shares of restricted common stock as compensation to current management and for payment of services rendered to the Company as follows: 467,500 shares, valued at $2,338, to Brian Waldo, pursuant to the terms of his consulting agreement; and 630,000 shares, valued at $3,150, to Christine B. Cheney, pursuant to the terms of her consulting agreement.

On April 10, 2015, the Company issued 900,000 shares of restricted common stock, valued at $4,500, as compensation to Richard Morrell, pursuant to the terms of his consulting agreement.

On June 30, 2015 the Company issued 60,000 shares of restricted common stock as compensation to Christine B. Cheney, pursuant to the terms of her consulting agreement, valued at $300.

On June 30, 2015 the Company issued 1,270,000 shares of restricted common stock, valued at $6,350 as compensation to various consultants working on the Find.com platform.

A number of Secured Noteholders exercised their option to receive a pro-rata share of 1,460,125 shares authorized as a forbearance fee in April 2012. A total of ~~903~~946,~~669~~773 shares have been issued through the date of this filing to satisfy this obligation. There are still ~~556~~513,~~456~~352 shares authorized to be issued to the remaining Secured Noteholders.

The Company claims an exemption from registration afforded by Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) since the foregoing issuances did not involve a public offering, the recipients took the shares for investment and not resale, the Company took appropriate measures to restrict transfer, and the recipients were either (a) “accredited investors”; (b) had access to similar documentation and information as would be required in a Registration Statement under the Act and/or (c) were officers and Directors of the Company. No underwriters or agents were involved in the foregoing issuances and the Company paid no underwriting discounts or commissions.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5. Other Information.

None.

Item 6. Exhibits

See the Exhibit Index following the signature page to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a list of exhibits filed or furnished with this report, which Exhibit Index is incorporated herein by reference.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	Generation Zero Group, Inc.
Dated: August 13, 2015	By:	/s/ Richard M. Morrell
Dated: October 30, 2015	By:	/s/ Richard M. Morrell
		Richard M. Morrell President, Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer), and Director
	By:	/s/ Christine B. Cheney Christine B. Cheney Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer), Treasurer, and Secretary

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number	Description of Exhibit
2.1(1)	Agreement and Plan of Merger by and Between the Company, StaffMD, Inc., Jeffrey Sisk and MedicalWork, LLC
3.1(2)	Articles of Incorporation
3.2(3)	Certificate of Designations of Series A Preferred Stock
3.3(3)	Certificate of Designations of Series B Preferred Stock
3.4(4)	Certificate of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation
3.5(2)	Bylaws
10.1(5)	Asset Purchase Agreement with Find.com Acquisition, Inc.
10.2(6)	Share Exchange Agreement with the Members of URL Holding
10.3(6)	Asset Purchase Agreement with Scientigo, Inc.
10.4(6)	Security Agreement executed by the Company in favor of Scientigo as collateral agent for the holders of the Notes
10.5(6)	Form of Secured Promissory Notes
10.6(6)	$55,000 Promissory Note with Scientigo
10.7(7)	Promissory Note $250,000 with Gerald Modesitt dated November 4, 2010
10.8(9)	Amendments to Promissory Note $250,000 with Gerald Modesitt dated April 16, 2012 and June 15, 2012
10.9(7)	Promissory Note $50,000 with Equity Trust Company Custodian FBO Larry Gantz IRA dated November 4, 2010
10.10(9)	Amendments to Promissory Note $50,000 with Equity Trust Company Custodian FBO Larry Gantz IRA dated April 16, 2012 and June 15, 2012
10.11(8)	Forbearance and Note Amendment Agreement
10.12(1)	Promissory Note ($3,950,000 – Jeffrey Sisk)
10.13(1)	Promissory Note ($250,000 – Geronimo Property Trust)
10.14(1)	Employment Agreement with Jeffrey Sisk
10.15(1)	Security Agreement with Geronimo Property Trust

10.16(1)	Subordination Agreement with Collateral Agent for Senior Noteholder
10.17(9)	Revision of Payment Terms of Promissory Note with Jeffrey Sisk
10.18(9)	Employment Agreement Compensation Waiver with Jeffrey Sisk (effective April 16, 2011)
10.19(9)	Assignment of Membership Interests Agreement with Jeffrey Sisk (December 31, 2011)
10.20(9)	Pledge Agreement with Jeffrey Sisk (December 31, 2011)
10.21(9)	Convertible Promissory Note – John Strickland and Kimberly Ann Griffith (August 15, 2012)
10.22(9)	First Addendum to Forbearance and Note Amendment Agreement
10.23(10)	Convertible Promissory Note with Richard M. Morrell dated July 11, 2013 ($25,000)
10.24(11)	$10,000 Promissory Note with Cynthia S. White (September 30, 2013)
10.25(11)	Extension of $250,000 Modesitt Note (November 2011)
10.26(12)	Consulting Agreement with Richard M. Morrell (November 25, 2013, to be effective as of July 22, 2013)
10.27(13)	Convertible Promissory Note with retirement account of Richard M. Morrell ($100,000)
10.28(14)	Consulting Agreement with Christine B. Cheney (April 30, 2014)
10.29(14)	Consulting Agreement with Brian Waldo (April 30, 2014)
10.30(15)	Second Addendum to Forbearance and Note Amendment Agreement (May 30, 2014)
10.31(15)	Amendment to Promissory Note $50,000 with Equity Trust Company Custodian FBO Larry Gantz IRA 110591 dated May 20, 2014
10.32(15)	Amendment to Promissory Note $250,000 with Gerald Modesitt dated May 20, 2014
10.33(16)	Convertible Promissory Note with retirement account of Richard M. Morrell ($100,000)(July 1, 2014)
10.34(17)	Publisher Agreement with Seedcorn (October 8, 2013)
10.35(17)	Convertible Promissory Note with Thomas M. Cheney IRA (October 10, 2014)
10.36(18)	reddbug Digital Marketing Agreement (December 2014)
10.37(19)	Convertible Promissory Note with G. Thomas Lovelace ($55,000) – December 14, 2014
10.38(19)	Convertible Promissory Note with James A. Hendrickson ($30,000) – December 15, 2014
10.39(19)	Convertible Promissory Note with James A. Hendrickson ($30,000) - March 1, 2015
31.1*	Certificate of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2*	Certificate of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
10.14(1)	Employment Agreement with Jeffrey Sisk
32.1***	Certificate of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
10.15(1)	Security Agreement with Geronimo Property Trust
32.2***	Certificate of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
10.16(1)	Subordination Agreement with Collateral Agent for Senior Noteholder
101.INS**	XBRL Instance Document
10.17(9)	Revision of Payment Terms of Promissory Note with Jeffrey Sisk
101.SCH**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
10.18(9)	Employment Agreement Compensation Waiver with Jeffrey Sisk (effective April 16, 2011)
101.CAL**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
10.19(9)	Assignment of Membership Interests Agreement with Jeffrey Sisk (December 31, 2011)
101.DEF**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
10.20(9)	Pledge Agreement with Jeffrey Sisk (December 31, 2011)
101.LAB**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
10.21(9)	Convertible Promissory Note – John Strickland and Kimberly Ann Griffith (August 15, 2012)
101.PRE**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
10.22(9)	First Addendum to Forbearance and Note Amendment Agreement
10.23(10)	Convertible Promissory Note with Richard M. Morrell dated July 11, 2013 ($25,000)
10.24(11)	$10,000 Promissory Note with Cynthia S. White (September 30, 2013)
10.25(11)	Extension of $250,000 Modesitt Note (November 2011)
10.26(12)	Consulting Agreement with Richard M. Morrell (November 25, 2013, to be effective as of July 22, 2013)
10.27(13)	Convertible Promissory Note with retirement account of Richard M. Morrell ($100,000)
10.28(14)	Consulting Agreement with Christine B. Cheney (April 30, 2014)
10.29(14)	Consulting Agreement with Brian Waldo (April 30, 2014)
10.30(15)	Second Addendum to Forbearance and Note Amendment Agreement (May 30, 2014)
10.31(15)	Amendment to Promissory Note $50,000 with Equity Trust Company Custodian FBO Larry Gantz IRA 110591 dated May 20, 2014
10.32(15)	Amendment to Promissory Note $250,000 with Gerald Modesitt dated May 20, 2014
10.33(16)	Convertible Promissory Note with retirement account of Richard M. Morrell ($100,000)(July 1, 2014)
10.34(17)	Publisher Agreement with Seedcorn (October 8, 2013)
10.35(17)	Convertible Promissory Note with Thomas M. Cheney IRA (October 10, 2014)
10.36(18)	reddbug Digital Marketing Agreement (December 2014)


10.37(19)	Convertible Promissory Note with G. Thomas Lovelace ($55,000) – December 14, 2014

10.38(19)	Convertible Promissory Note with James A. Hendrickson ($30,000) – December 15, 2014

10.39(19)	Convertible Promissory Note with James A. Hendrickson ($30,000) - March 1, 2015

31.1*	Certificate of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2*	Certificate of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1***	Certificate of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.2***	Certificate of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

101.INS**	XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE**	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

* Filed herewith.

*** Furnished herewith.

(1) Filed as an exhibit to our Form 8-K Current Report, filed with the Commission on February 14, 2011, and incorporated herein by reference.

(2) Filed as an exhibit to our Form SB-2 Registration Statement filed with the Commission on October 1, 2007, and incorporated herein by reference.

(3) Filed as an exhibit to our Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 19, 2009, and incorporated herein by reference.

(4) Filed as an exhibit to our Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 8, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.

(5) Filed as an exhibit to our Form 10-Q Quarterly Report, filed with the Commission on May 24, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.

(6) Filed as an exhibit to our Form 8-K Current Report, filed with the Commission on July 12, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.

(7) Filed as an exhibit to our Form 8-K Current Report, filed with the Commission on November 24, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.

(8) Filed as an exhibit to our Form 8-K Current Report, filed with the Commission on December 10, 2010, and incorporated herein by reference.

(9) Filed as an exhibit to our Form 10-K Annual Report, filed with the Commission on January 25, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.

(10) Filed as an exhibit to our Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Commission on July 23, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.

(11) Filed as an exhibit to our Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ending September 30, 2013, filed with the Commission on November 19, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.

(12) Filed as an exhibit to our Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Commission on December 3, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.

(13) Filed as an exhibit to our Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Commission on December 10, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference.

(14) Filed as an exhibit to our Form 10-Q Quarterly Report for the period ending March 31, 2014, filed with the Commission on May 8, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference.

(15) Filed as an exhibit to our Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Commission on June 3, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference.

(16) Filed as an exhibit to our Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Commission on July 9, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference.

(17) Filed as an exhibit to our Form 10-Q Quarterly Report filed with the Commission on November 13, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference.

(18) Filed as an exhibit to our Form 8-K Current Report filed with the Commission on January 13, 2015, and incorporated by reference herein.

(19) Filed as an exhibit to our Form 10-K Annual Report, filed with the Commission on April 14, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference.

** XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

Filing Compare · Generation Zero Group, Inc.