UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-−Q

(Mark One)

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: ~~March~~September 3130, 2013

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to _____________

Commission File Number: 000-23039

CHINA PRECISION STEEL, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware		14-1623047
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

18th Floor, Teda Building 87 Wing LokStreet,Sheungwan, Hong Kong People’s Republic of China

87 Wing Lok Street, Sheungwan, Hong Kong

People’s Republic of China

(Address of principal executive offices, Zip Code)

852-2543-2290

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

	Large accelerated filer [ ]	Accelerated filer [ ]
	Non-accelerated filer [ ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of ~~May~~November 714, 2013 is as follows:

Class of Securities		Shares Outstanding
Common Stock, $0.001 par value		3,880,866

CHINA PRECISION STEEL, INC.

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q Three Months Ended September 30, 2013

Three and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Pages
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PART I
ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.		3
FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3
ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.		4
ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.	3
ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.		14
ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.	4
ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.		14
ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.	18
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.	18
ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.		15
PART II
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS.		15
OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.		16
ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.	19
ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.		16
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS.	19
ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.		16
ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.	19
ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION.		16
ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.	19
ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS.		16
ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.	19
SIGNATURES			17
ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION.	19
ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS.	20
	SIGNATURES	21

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS.

CHINA PRECISION STEEL, INC. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013 AND 2012

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2013 AND 2012

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

		Page(s)

Consolidated Balance Sheets (unaudited)		F-1

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (unaudited)		F-2

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (unaudited)		F-3

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (unaudited)		F-4

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)		F-5

China Precision Steel, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	Notes		September 30, 2013			June 30, 2013

Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents			$	66,496		$	75,243
Accounts receivable
Trade, net of allowances of $35,802,825 and $30,642,373 at September 30 and June 30, 2013, respectively		5		24,264,027			29,480,738
Bills receivable				-			94,089
Other receivable				1,108,601			1,041,255
Inventories, net		6		16,560,141			15,837,201
Prepaid expenses				325,707			467,890
Advances to suppliers, net of allowance of $19,803,917 and $19,689,609 at September 30 and June 30, 2013, respectively		7		11,560,317			9,304,847

Total current assets				53,885,289			56,301,263

Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment, net		8		59,289,484			61,366,745
Construction-in-progress		9		280,046			255,996

				59,569,530			61,622,741

Intangible assets, net		10		1,897,885			1,903,675

Goodwill				99,999			99,999

Total assets			$	115,452,703		$	119,927,678

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

Current liabilities
Short-term loans		11	$	28,111,165		$	28,028,722
Long-term loan - current portion		12		16,200,000			16,200,000
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities				9,086,933			7,044,007
Advances from customers				4,478,871			1,456,420
Other taxes payables				8,085,729			8,295,220
Current income taxes payable				6,011,203			5,993,574

Total current liabilities				71,973,901			67,017,943

Long-term loan		12		-			-

Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock: $0.001 per value, 500,000 shares authorized, no shares outstanding at September 30 and June 30, 2013, respectively		13		-			-
Common stock: $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized, 3,880,866 issued and outstanding at September 30 and June 30, 2013, respectively		13		3,880			3,880
Additional paid-in capital		13		75,685,066			75,685,066
Accumulated other comprehensive income				22,222,029			22,075,822
Accumulated deficit				(54,432,173	)		(44,855,033	)

Total stockholders’ equity				43,478,802			52,909,735

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity			$	115,452,703		$	119,927,678

(Unaudited)

	Notes		March 31, 2013			June 30, 2012
Assets
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents			$	162,273		$	1,602,805
Accounts receivable
Trade, net of allowances of $23,320,482 and $3,231,613 at March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively				38,473,081			59,116,931
Bills receivable				25,256			173,089
Other				936,795			1,117,243
Inventories		6		20,559,566			15,516,220
Prepaid expenses				582,129			668,867
Advances to suppliers, net of allowance of $4,726,554 and $4,623,323 at March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively		7		37,858,418			37,384,684
Total current assets				98,597,518			115,579,839
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment, net		8		62,419,482			67,752,991
Construction-in-progress		9		245,692			233,512
				62,665,174			67,986,503
Intangible assets, net		10		1,890,829			1,880,129
Goodwill				99,999			99,999
Total assets			$	163,253,520		$	185,546,470
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities
Short-term loans		11	$	27,673,871		$	27,246,477
Long-term loan - current portion		12		16,200,000			16,200,000
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities				9,989,856			6,772,892
Advances from customers				2,746,107			2,253,956
Other taxes payables				8,088,623			8,446,373
Current income taxes payable				5,917,694			5,756,178
Total current liabilities				70,616,151			66,675,876
Long-term loans		12		-			-
Stockholders’ equity:
Preferred stock: $0.001 per value, 8,000,000 shares authorized, no shares outstanding at March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively		13		-			-
Common stock: $0.001 par value, 62,000,000 shares authorized, 3,880,866 issued and outstanding at March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012, respectively		13		3,880			3,880
Additional paid-in capital		13		75,685,066			75,685,066
Accumulated other comprehensive income				21,458,253			19,097,295
Retained (deficit)/earnings				(4,509,830	)		24,084,353
Total stockholders’ equity				92,637,369			118,870,594
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity			$	163,253,520		$	185,546,470

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-1

China Precision Steel, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (Unaudited)

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income

	Notes		2013			2012

Sales revenues			$	11,765,387		$	5,956,760
Cost of goods sold				14,759,646			7,423,709
Gross (loss)				(2,994,259	)		(1,466,949	)

Operating expenses

Selling expenses				31,168			29,273
Administrative expenses				447,431			442,615
Allowance for bad and doubtful debts				5,121,777			1,373,000
Depreciation and amortization expense				48,142			51,961

Total operating expenses				5,648,518			1,896,849

(Loss) from operations				(8,642,777	)		(3,363,798	)

Other income/(expense)

Other revenues				2,528			103
Interest and finance costs				(936,891	)		(858,588	)

Total other (expense)				(934,363	)		(858,485	)

(Loss) from operations before income tax				(9,577,140	)		(4,222,283	)

Provision for income tax		14
Current				-			-

Total income tax				-			-

Net (loss)			$	(9,577,140	)	$	(4,222,283	)

Basic (loss) per share		15	$	(2.47	)	$	(1.09	)

Basic weighted average shares outstanding				3,880,866			3,880,866

Diluted (loss) per share		15	$	(2.47	)	$	(1.09	)

Diluted weighted average shares outstanding				3,880,866			3,880,866

Components of comprehensive (loss):
Net (loss)			$	(9,577,140	)	$	(4,222,283	)
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency translation adjustment				146,207			1,282,697

Comprehensive (loss)			$	(9,430,933	)	$	(2,939,586	)

For the Three and Nine Months Ended March 31, 2013 and 2012

(Unaudited)

			Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	Notes		2013			2012			2013			2012
Sales revenues			$	8,563,497		$	29,494,865		$	22,684,524		$	105,324,043
Cost of goods sold				10,938,804			30,612,073			27,828,738			108,178,198
Gross (loss)				(2,375,307	)		(1,117,208	)		(5,144,214	)		(2,854,155	)
Operating expenses
Selling expenses				31,901			63,734			86,237			172,223
Administrative expenses				576,091			781,221			1,420,503			2,007,777
Allowance for bad and doubtful debts				9,665,828			522,118			19,825,042			522,118
Depreciation and amortization expense				51,742			54,173			155,753			162,610
Total operating expenses				10,325,562			1,421,246			21,487,535			2,864,728
(Loss) from operations				(12,700,869	)		(2,538,454	)		(26,631,749	)		(5,718,883	)
Other income/(expense)
Other revenues				70,743			20,434			678,500			89,505
Interest and finance costs				(857,269	)		(794,895	)		(2,640,934	)		(2,273,473	)
Total other (expense)				(786,526	)		(774,461	)		(1,962,434	)		(2,183,968	)
(Loss) from operations before income tax				(13,487,395	)		(3,312,915	)		(28,594,183	)		(7,902,851	)
Provision for income tax		14
Current				-			108			-			27,189
Total income tax expense				-			108			-			27,189
Net (loss)			$	(13,487,395	)	$	(3,313,023	)	$	(28,594,183	)	$	(7,930,040	)
Basic (loss) per share		15	$	(3.48	)	$	(0.85	)	$	(7.37	)	$	(2.04	)
Basic weighted average shares outstanding				3,880,866			3,880,866			3,880,866			3,880,866
Diluted (loss) per share		15	$	(3.48	)	$	(0.85	)	$	(7.37	)	$	(2.04	)
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding				3,880,866			3,880,866			3,880,866			3,880,866
Components of comprehensive (loss)/income:
Net (loss)			$	(13,487,395	)	$	(3,313,023	)	$	(28,594,183	)	$	(7,930,040	)
Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency translation adjustment				168,529			185,979			2,360,958			3,456,634
Comprehensive (loss)			$	(13,318,866	)	$	(3,127,044	)	$	(26,233,225	)	$	(4,473,406	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-2

China Precision Steel, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 (Unaudited)

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

							Accumulated
					Additional		Other					Total
	Common Stock				Paid-in		Comprehensive		Accumulated			Stockholder’
	Share		Amount		Capital		Income		deficit			Equity

Balance at June 30, 2013		3,880,866		3,880		75,685,066		22,075,822		(44,855,033	)		52,909,735

Foreign currency translation adjustment		-		-		-		146,207		-			146,207

Net loss		-		-		-		-		(9,577,140	)		(9,577,140	)

Balance at September 30, 2013		3,880,866	$	3,880	$	75,685,066	$	22,222,029	$	(54,432,173	)	$	43,478,802

For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2013

(Unaudited)

							Accumulated
					Additional		Other					Total
	Ordinary Shares				Paid-in		Comprehensive		Retained			Stockholders’
	Share		Amount		Capital		Income		Earnings/(deficit)			Equity
Balance at June 30, 2012		3,880,866	$	3,880	$	75,685,066	$	19,097,295	$	24,084,353		$	118,870,594
Foreign currency translation adjustment		-		-		-		2,360,958		-			2,360,958
Net loss		-		-		-		-		(28,594,183	)		(28,594,183	)
Balance at March 31, 2013		3,880,866	$	3,880	$	75,685,066	$	21,458,253	$	(4,509,830	)	$	92,637,369

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-3

China Precision Steel, Inc. and Subsidiaries Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013 and 2012 (Unaudited)

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

	2013			2012

Cash flows from operating activities
Net (loss)	$	(9,577,140	)	$	(4,222,283	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization		2,258,320			2,254,886
Allowance for bad and doubtful debts		5,121,777			1,373,000

Net changes in assets and liabilities:

Accounts receivable, net		263,186			694,880
Inventories		(676,357	)		(1,925,422	)
Prepaid expenses		142,764			206,353
Advances to suppliers		(2,284,494	)		889,785
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		2,022,999			456,346
Advances from customers		3,018,167			519,750
Other taxes payable		(233,891	)		(108,457	)
Current income taxes		-			32,630

Net cash provided by operating activities		55,331			171,468

Cash flows from investing activities

Purchase of property, plant and equipment, including construction in progress		(14,633	)		(7,424	)

Net cash (used in) investing activities		(14,633	)		(7,424	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Repayments of short-term loans		(47,650	)		-

Net cash (used in) financing activities		(47,650	)		-

Effect of exchange rate		(1,795	)		(171,282	)

Net (decrease) in cash		(8,747	)		(7,238	)

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		75,243			1,602,805

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	66,496		$	1,595,567

For the Nine Months Ended March 31, 2013 and 2012

	2013			2012
Cash flows from operating activities
Net (loss)	$	(28,594,183	)	$	(7,930,040	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
Depreciation and amortization		6,876,606			6,763,799
Gain on disposal of property, plant and equipment		-			(36,945	)
Allowance for bad and doubtful debts		19,825,042			522,118
Inventory provision		-			636,405
Net changes in assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		2,304,215			(3,448,433	)
Inventories		(4,696,893	)		(3,416,954	)
Prepaid expenses		94,093			(86,378	)
Advances to suppliers		412,483			2,365,370
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		3,071,081			3,343,901
Advances from customers		441,823			4,088,100
Other taxes payable		(546,344	)		(144,398	)
Current income taxes		32,989			-
Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities		(779,088	)		2,656,545
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of property, plant and equipment, including construction in progress		(120,079	)		(365,568	)
Purchases of intangible assets		(2,724	)		-
Proceeds from disposal of property, plant and equipment		-			55,933
Net cash (used in) investing activities		(122,803	)		(309,635	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Repayments of short-term loans		(542,696	)		-
Repayments of long-term loan		-			(2,874,740	)
Net cash (used in) financing activities		(542,696	)		(2,874,740	)
Effect of exchange rate		4,055			64,685
Net (decrease) in cash		(1,440,532	)		(463,145	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		1,602,805			2,707,754
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	162,273		$	2,244,609

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

China Precision Steel, Inc. Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1. Description of Business

China Precision Steel, Inc. (the “Company,” “CPSL” or “we”) is a steel processing company principally engaged in the manufacture and sale of cold-rolled precision steel products for downstream applications including automobile components and spare parts, kitchen tools, electrical appliances, roofing and food packaging materials. Raw materials, hot-rolled steel coils, will go through certain reduction, heating and cutting processing procedures to give steel coils or plates different thickness and specifications for deliveries in accordance with customers’ requirements. Specialty precision steel offers specific control of thickness, shape, width, surface finish and other special quality features that compliment the need for highly engineered end use applications. Precision steel pertains to the precision of measurements and tolerances of the above factors, especially thickness tolerance.

We have five wholly-owned subsidiaries, Partner Success Holdings Limited (“PSHL”), Blessford International Limited (“Blessford International”), Shanghai Chengtong Precision Strip Company Limited (“Chengtong”), Shanghai Blessford Alloy Company Limited (“Shanghai Blessford”) and Shanghai Tuorong Precision Strip Company Limited (“Tuorong”). The Company’s principal activities are conducted through our two operating subsidiaries, Chengtong and Shanghai Blessford with manufacturing facilities located in Shanghai, the People’s Republic of China (the “PRC”). The sole activity of Tuorong is the ownership of land use rights with respect to facilities utilized by Chengtong and Shanghai Blessford. PSHL and Blessford International are both British Virgin Islands companies with the sole purpose of investment holding.

2. Basis of Preparation of Financial Statements

The financial statements have been prepared in order to present the consolidated financial position and consolidated results of operations in accordance with ~~accounting principles~~ generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) and are expressed in terms of US dollars (see Note 3 “Functional Currency and Translating Financial Statements” below).

In June and July 2012, the Company defaulted on the repayment obligations of its short-term and long-term bank loans totaling $4344,~~873~~311,~~871~~165. ~~Each~~ of the banks also have the right to take possession of the collateral (which collectively constitute substantial assets of the Company) granted in connection with their respective loan agreements, which action would have a material adverse impact on the Company. The Company is currently in discussions with its banks regarding the restructuring of these loans for repayment but has not yet agreed on specific terms. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully work out a repayment plan or otherwise fulfill its obligations under the loans. The uncertainty surrounding the successful restructuring of our bank loans and our current lack of readily available liquidity provided by other third party sources raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements as of ~~March~~September 3130, 2013 and for the periods ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013 and 2012 have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X applicable to smaller reporting companies. In the opinion of management, these unaudited consolidated financial statements include all adjustments considered necessary to make the financial statements not misleading. The results of operations for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year ending June 30, ~~2013~~2014.

3. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies:

Cash and Cash Equivalents – The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity period of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The carrying amounts reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents approximate their fair value.

F-5

Accounts Receivable – Credit periods vary substantially across industries, segments, types and size of companies in the PRC where we operate our business. Because of the niche products that we process, our customers are usually also niche players in their own respective segment, who then sell their products to end product manufacturers. The business cycle is relatively long, as well as the credit periods. The Company offers credit to its customers for periods of 60 days, 90 days, 120 days and 180 days. We generally offer longer credit terms to long-standing recurring customers with good payment histories and sizable operations. Accounts receivable are recorded at the time revenue is recognized and are stated net of allowance for doubtful accounts.

Allowance ~~for~~ for Doubtful Accounts – The Company maintains an allowance for doubtful accounts based on its assessment of the collectability of the accounts receivable. Management determines the collectability of outstanding accounts by maintaining regular communication with such customers and obtaining confirmation of their intent to fulfill their obligations to the Company. Management also considers past collection experience, our relationship with customers and the impact of current economic conditions on our industry and market. ~~However,~~We we note that the continuation or intensification of the ~~current~~credit ~~global~~tightening ~~economic~~in ~~crisis~~China ~~may~~and the slowdown of the Chinese economy had and will continue to have negative consequences on the business operations of our customers and adversely impact their ability to meet their financial obligations. To reserve for potentially uncollectible accounts receivable, management has made a 50% provision for all accounts receivable that are over 180 days past due and full provision for all accounts receivable over 1 year past due. We ~~From~~also ~~time~~regularly ~~to time, we will~~ review these credit periods, along with our collection experience and the other factors discussed above, to evaluate the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts, and to make changes to the allowance, if necessary. If our actual collection experience or other conditions change, revisions to our allowances may be required, including a further provision which could adversely affect our operating income, or write back of provision when estimated uncollectible accounts are actually collected. At ~~March~~September 3130, 2013 and June 30, ~~2012~~ 2013, the Company had $2335,~~320~~802,~~482~~825 and $330,~~231~~642,~~613~~373 of allowances for doubtful accounts, respectively.

Bad debts are written off for past due balances over two years or when it becomes known to management that such amount is uncollectible. There was a provision for accounts receivable bad debts of $95,~~665~~065,~~828~~438 and $191,~~825~~373,~~042~~000 recognized for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013~~, respectively. There was a provision for accounts receivable bad debts of $522,118 recognized for the three~~ and ~~nine months ended March 31~~2012, ~~2012~~respectively.

Inventories – Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined using the weighted average method. Cost of inventories comprises all costs of purchases, costs of conversion and other costs incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition. Costs of conversion of inventories include fixed and variable production overheads, taking into account the stage of completion.

~~Intangible~~Cost of inventories ~~Assets~~comprises ~~and~~all ~~Amortization~~costs –of ~~Intangible~~purchases, ~~assets~~costs ~~represent~~of ~~land~~conversion ~~use~~and ~~rights~~other incosts ~~China~~incurred ~~acquired~~in bybringing the ~~Company~~inventories ~~and~~to ~~are~~their ~~stated~~present location atand ~~cost less amortization~~condition. ~~Amortization~~Costs of ~~land-use~~conversion ~~rights~~of isinventories ~~calculated~~include onfixed ~~the~~and ~~straight-line~~variable ~~method~~production overheads, ~~based~~taking oninto account the ~~period over~~stage ~~which~~of ~~the right is granted by the relevant authorities in China~~completion.

Advances to Suppliers – In order to ensure a steady supply of raw materials, the Company is required to regularly make cash advances to its suppliers when placing purchase orders, for a guaranteed minimum delivery quantity at future times when raw materials are required. The advance is seen as a deposit to suppliers and guarantees our access to raw materials during periods of shortages and market volatility, and is therefore considered an important component of our operations. Contracted raw materials are priced at prevailing market rates when the advance purchase contracts are entered into. Advances to suppliers are shown net of an allowance which represents potentially unrecoverable cash advances at each balance sheet date. Such allowances are based on an analysis of past raw materials receipt experience and the credibility of each supplier according to its size and background. In general, we do not provide allowances against advances paid to those PRC state-owned companies as there is minimal risk of default. Our allowances for advances to suppliers are subjective critical estimates that have a direct impact on reported net earnings, and are reviewed quarterly at a minimum to reflect changes from our historic raw materials receipt experience and to ensure the appropriateness of the allowance in light of the circumstances present at the time of the review. It is reasonably possible that the Company’s estimate of the allowance will change, such as in the case when the Company becomes aware of a supplier’s inability to deliver the contracted raw materials or meet its financial obligations. As of ~~March~~September 3130, 2013 and June 30, ~~2012~~2013, the Company had ~~made allowances of advances to suppliers of~~ $4940,~~726,554~~453 and $4937,~~623~~695 of inventory provision,~~323,~~ respectively.

Intangible Assets and Amortization – Intangible assets represent land use rights in China acquired by the Company and are stated at cost less amortization and impairment, if any. Amortization of land-use rights is calculated on the straight-line method, based on the period over which the right is granted by the relevant authorities in China.

Advances to Suppliers – In order to ensure a steady supply of raw materials, the Company is required to regularly make cash advances to its suppliers when placing purchase orders, for a guaranteed minimum delivery quantity at future times when raw materials are required. The advance is seen as a deposit to suppliers and guarantees our access to raw materials during periods of shortages and market volatility, and is therefore considered an important component of our operations. Contracted raw materials are priced at prevailing market rates when the advance purchase contracts are entered into. Advances to suppliers are shown net of an allowance which represents potentially unrecoverable cash advances at each balance sheet date. Such allowances are based on an analysis of past raw materials receipt experience and the credibility of each supplier according to its size and background. Our allowances for advances to suppliers are subjective critical estimates that have a direct impact on reported net earnings, and are reviewed quarterly at a minimum to reflect changes from our historic raw materials receipt experience and to ensure the appropriateness of the allowance in light of the circumstances present at the time of the review. It is reasonably possible that the Company’s estimate of the allowance will change, such as in the case when the Company becomes aware of a supplier’s inability to deliver the contracted raw materials or meet its financial obligations. As of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013, the Company had made allowances of advances to suppliers of $19,803,917 and $19,689,609, respectively.

F-6

Allowances for advances to suppliers are written off when all efforts to collect the materials or recover the cash advances have been unsuccessful, or or when it has become known to the management that there is no intention by the suppliers to deliver the contracted raw materials or refund the cash advances. ToThere ~~date~~was a provision for advances to suppliers bad debts of $56,339 weand ~~have~~$nil ~~not~~recognized ~~written~~for ~~off~~the ~~any~~three ~~advances~~months toended ~~suppliers~~September 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Property, Plant and Equipment – Property, plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. The cost of an asset comprises its purchase price and any directly attributable costs of bringing the asset to its present working condition and location for its intended use.

Depreciation is computed on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets for financial reporting purposes. The estimated useful lives for significant property and equipment are as follows:

Buildings	10 years
Plant and machinery	10 years
Motor vehicles	5 years
Office equipment	5 years

Repairs and maintenance costs are normally charged to the statement of operations in the year in which they are incurred. In situations where it can be clearly demonstrated that the expenditure has resulted in an increase in the future economic benefits expected to be obtained from the use of the asset, the expenditure is capitalized as an additional cost of the asset.

Impairment of of Long-Lived Assets – The Company accounts for impairment of property, plant and equipment and amortizable intangible assets in accordance with ASC Topic No. 360 “Property, Plant and Equipment” (“ASC 360”), which requires the Company to evaluate a long-lived asset for recoverability when there is an event or circumstance that indicates the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. An impairment loss is recognized when the carrying amount of a long-lived asset or asset group is not recoverable (when carrying amount exceeds the gross, undiscounted cash flows from use and disposition) and is measured as the excess of the carrying amount over the asset’s (or asset group’s) fair value. We primarily use the income valuation approach to determine the fair value of our long-lived assets, with fair value being the price that would be received from selling an asset in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

Capitalized ~~Interest~~ Interest – The Company capitalizes interest cost on borrowings incurred during the new construction or upgrade of qualified assets. Capitalized interest is added to the cost of the underlying assets and is amortized over the useful lives of the assets. During the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013 and 2012, the Company capitalized $nil interest to construction-in-progress.

Construction-in-Progress – Plant and production lines currently under development are accounted for as construction-in-progress. Construction-in-progress is recorded at acquisition cost, including land rights cost, development expenditure, professional fees and the interest expenses capitalized during the course of construction for the purpose of financing the project. Upon completion and readiness for use of the project, the cost of construction-in-progress is to be transferred to property, plant and equipment.

Contingent Liabilities and Contingent Assets – A contingent liability is a possible obligation that arises from past events and whose existence will only be confirmed by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more uncertain future events not wholly within the control of the Company. It can also be a present obligation arising from past events that is not recognized because it is not probable that outflow of economic resources will be required or the amount of obligation cannot be measured reliably.

A contingent liability is not recognized but is disclosed in the notes to the financial statements. When a change in the probability of an outflow occurs so that outflow is probable, the contingency is then recognized as a provision.

F-7

A contingent asset is a possible asset that arises from past events and whose existence will be confirmed only by the occurrence or non-occurrence of one or more uncertain events not wholly within the control of the Company.

Contingent assets are not recognized but are disclosed in the notes to the financial statements when an inflow of economic benefits is probable. When inflow is virtually certain, an asset is recognized.

F-7

Advances from Customers – Advances from customers represent advance cash receipts from customers and for which goods have not been delivered or services have not been rendered at each balance sheet date. Advances from customers for goods to be delivered or services to be rendered in the subsequent period are carried forward as deferred revenue.

Revenue Recognition – Revenue from the sale of goods and services is recognized on the transfer of risks and rewards of ownership, which generally coincides with the time when the goods are delivered to customers and the title has passed and services have been rendered. Revenue is reported net of all VAT taxes. Other income is recognized when it is earned.

Our operating results and operating cash flows historically have been subject to seasonal variations. Our revenues are usually higher in the second half of the calendar year than in the first half of the calendar year and the first quarter of the calendar year is usually the slowest quarter because fewer projects are undertaken during and around the Chinese New Year holidays.

Functional Currency and Translating Financial Statements – The Company’s principal country of operations is the PRC. Our functional currency is Chinese Renminbi; however, the accompanying consolidated financial statements have been expressed in United States Dollars (“USD”). The consolidated balance sheets have been translated into USD at the exchange rates prevailing at each balance sheet date. The consolidated statements of operations and cash flows have been translated using the weighted-average exchange rates prevailing during the periods of each statement. The registered equity capital denominated in the functional currency is translated at the historical rate of exchange at the time of capital contribution. All translation adjustments resulting from the translation of the financial statements into the reporting currency are dealt with as other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income – Accumulated other comprehensive income represents the change in equity of the Company during the periods presented from foreign currency translation adjustments.

Taxation – Taxation on overseas profits has been calculated on the estimated assessable profits for the year at the rates of taxation prevailing in the country in which the Company operates.

United States

China Precision Steel, Inc. is subject to United States federal income tax at a tax rate of 34%. No provision for income taxes in the United States has been made as China Precision Steel, Inc. had no taxable income in ~~fiscal~~three ~~years~~months ~~2012~~ended September 30, 2013 and ~~2011~~2012.

At ~~March~~ 31September 30, 2013 and June 30, ~~2012~~2013, the Company had no unrecognized income tax positions recorded. The Company does not expect its unrecognized tax positions to change significantly in the next twelve months. If unrecognized tax positions existed, the interest and penalties related to the unrecognized tax positions would be recorded as income tax expense in the consolidated statements of operation and comprehensive income.

The Company is subject to United States federal income taxes, as well as income taxes in various states and foreign jurisdictions. The Company’s tax years ~~2010~~2009 through 2012 remain open to examination for U.S. federal income taxes. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to state or non-U.S. income tax examinations prior to ~~2010~~2009.

BVI

PSHL and Blessford International were incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and, under the current laws of the British Virgin Islands, are not subject to income taxes.

F-8

PRC

Provision for the PRC enterprise income tax is calculated at the prevailing rate based on the estimated assessable profits less available tax relief for losses brought forward. The Company does not accrue taxes on unremitted earnings from foreign operations as it is the Company’s intention to invest these earnings in the foreign operations indefinitely.

F-8

Enterprise income tax

On March 16, 2007, the National People’s Congress of China passed The Enterprise Income Tax Law (the “New EIT Law”), and on December 6, 2007, the State Council of China passed the Implementing Rules for the EIT Law (“Implementing Rules”) which took effect on January 1, 2008. The New EIT Law and Implementing Rules impose a unified enterprise income tax (“EIT”) of of 25% on all domestic-invested enterprises and foreign- invested entities (“FIEs”), unless they qualify under certain limited exceptions. Therefore, nearly all FIEs are subject to the new tax rate alongside other domestic businesses rather than benefiting from the old FIE tax laws, and its associated preferential tax treatments, beginning January 1, 2008.

Despite these changes, the EIT Law gives the FIEs established before March 16, 2007 (“Old FIEs”) a five-year grandfather period during which they can continue to enjoy their existing preferential tax treatments, commonly referred to as “tax holidays”, until these holidays expire. As an Old FIE, Chengtong’s tax holiday of a 50% reduction in the 25% statutory rates expired on December 31, 2008. Shanghai Blessford’s full tax exemption from the enterprise income tax expired on December 31, 2009, and its 50% income tax reduction for the three subsequent years expired on December 31, 2012. Both Chengtong and Shanghai Blessford are currently subject to the 25% statutory rates. The discontinuation of any such special or preferential tax treatment or other incentives would have an adverse effect on any organization’s business, fiscal condition and current operations in China.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statements carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets, including tax loss and credit carry forwards, and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred income tax expense represents the change during the period in the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities. The components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities are individually classified as current and non-current based on their characteristics. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

The Company follows the provisions of the ASC Topic No. 740 “Accounting for Income Taxes” and “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes – an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“ASC 740”). ASC 740 requires the recognition of tax benefits or expenses based on the estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the financial statements and tax bases of its assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities primarily relate to tax basis differences on unrealized gains on corporate equities, stock-based compensation, amortization periods of certain intangible assets and differences between the financial statements and tax bases of assets acquired.

The Company recognizes that virtually all tax positions in the PRC are not free of some degree of uncertainty due to tax law and policy changes in the PRC. However, the Company cannot reasonably quantify political risk factors and thus must depend on guidance issued by current officials in the PRC.

Based on all known facts and circumstances and current tax law, the Company believes that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of ~~March 31~~September 30, 2013 is not material to its results of operations, financial condition or cash flows. The Company also believes that the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, if recognized, would not have a material effect on its ~~effective~~ effective tax rate. The Company further believes that there are no tax positions for which it is reasonably possible, based on current Chinese tax law and policy, that the unrecognized tax benefits will significantly increase or decrease over the next 12 months producing, individually or in the aggregate, a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

F-9

Value added tax

~~The Provisional~~Under the Provisional Regulations of the People’s Republic of China Concerning Value Added Tax ~~promulgated by the State Council came into effect on January 1, 1994. Under these regulations~~ and ~~the~~its Implementing Rules ~~of the Provisional Regulations of the People’s Republic of China Concerning Value Added Tax~~, value added tax is imposed on goods sold in or imported into the PRC and on processing, repair and replacement services provided within the PRC.

Value added tax payable in the PRC is charged on an aggregated basis at a rate of 13% or 17% (depending on the type of goods involved) on the full price collected for the goods sold or, in the case of taxable services provided, at a rate of 17% on the charges for the taxable services provided, but excluding, in respect of both goods and services, any amount paid in respect of value added tax included in the price or charges, and less any deductible value added tax already paid by the taxpayer on purchases of goods and services in the same financial year.

The revised People’s Republic of China Tentative Regulations on Value Added Tax became effective on January 1, 2009 with the issuance of Order of the State Council No. 538. With the implementation of this VAT reform, input VAT associated with the purchase of fixed assets is now deductible against output VAT.

Retirement Benefit Costs – According to the PRC regulations on pension, Chengtong and Shanghai Blessford contribute to a defined contribution retirement scheme organized by municipal government in the province in which Chengtong and Shanghai Blessford were registered and all qualified employees are eligible to participate in the scheme. Contributions to the scheme are calculated at 37% of the employees’ salaries above a fixed threshold amount and the employees contribute 11%, while Chengtong and Shanghai Blessford contribute the balance contribution of 26%. The Group has no other material obligation for the payment of retirement benefits beyond the annual contributions under this scheme.

For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013 and 2012, the Company’s pension cost charged to the statements of operations under the plan amounted to $~~182~~71,~~303~~010 and $~~199~~64,~~975~~741, respectively, all of which have been paid to the National Social Security Fund.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments – The carrying amounts of certain financial instruments, including cash, accounts receivable, other receivables, short-term loans, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and other payables approximate their fair values as at ~~March~~ 31September 30, 2013 and June 30, ~~2012~~2013 because of the relatively short-term maturity of these instruments. The Company considers the carrying amount of long-term loans to approximate their fair values based on the interest rates of the instruments and the current market rate of interest.

Use of Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in accordance with ~~generally~~US ~~accepted~~GAAP ~~accounting principles~~ requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates inherent in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements include allowance for doubtful accounts, provision for advances to suppliers bad debts, inventory and cost of sales, income taxes, and useful lives and impairment of long-lived assets.

4. Concentrations of Business and Credit Risk

The Company’s list of customers whose purchases from us were 10% or more of total sales during ~~nine~~the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013 ~~and~~ and 2012 is as follows:

	2013						2012
a. Customers	$			% ofto sales			$		% to sales	~~% of sales~~
Shanghai Shengdejia Metal Products Co., Ltd.		-	*		-	*		14,107,630			13
ChangshuJiacheng Steel Plate Co., Ltd.		1,939,400			16		699,359			12
Shanghai Changshuo Steel Co., Ltd.		-	*		-	*		12,068,785			11
Hangzhou Pugang Steel Materials Co., Ltd.		1,290,449			11		-	*		-
Hangzhou Cogeneration Import & Export Co., Ltd.		-	*		-	*		11,204,723			11
Unimax& Far Corporation		-	*		-	*	637,147			11
Shanghai WoziJintian Blade Co., Ltd.		-	*		-	*	607,652			10

* Not 10% customers for the relevant periods

F-10

The Company’s list of suppliers whose sales to us were 10% or more of our total purchases during ~~nine~~the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013 ~~and~~ and 2012 is as follows:

	2013						2012
b. Suppliers	$			% ofto ~~purchases~~Purchases			$			% to purchases	~~% of purchases~~
Wuxi Hangda Trading Co., Ltd.		2,439,776			12			13,530,357				14
Maoxun Trading Co., Ltd.		4,064,780			37		-	*			-	*
Shanghai Tuoda Metal Co., Ltd.		1,998,539			11			-	*			-	*
ChangshuJiacheng Steel Plate Co., Ltd.		1,778,000			16		-	*			-	*
Hebei Nuojin Steel Co., Ltd.		-	*		-	*		22,800,704				24
Zhongchuan Industrial Logistics Co., Ltd.		1,427,571			13		-	*			-	*
Dachang Huizu Baosheng Steel Products Co., Ltd.		-	*		-	*		21,403,015				23
HebeiNuojin Trading Co., Ltd.		-	*		-	*	1,611,038				29
Shanghai Piyun Steel Co., Ltd.		-	*		-	*		11,142,163				12
Shanghai Tuoda Metal Materials Co., Ltd.		-	*		-	*	1,174,399				21

* Not 10% suppliers for the relevant periods

Our management continues to take appropriate actions to perform ongoing business and credit reviews of our customers to reduce our exposure to new and recurring customers who have been deemed to pose a high credit risk to our business based on their commercial credit reports, our collection history, and our perception of the risk posed by their geographic location.

5. Accounts Receivable

The Company provides credit in the normal course of business. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its domestic and international customers and clients and maintains allowances for bad and doubtful accounts based on factors surrounding the credit risk of specific customers and clients, historical trends, and other information. Trade accounts receivable, net totaled $3824,~~473~~264,~~081~~ 027 and $5929,~~116~~480,~~931~~738 as of September ~~March 31~~30, 2013 and June 30, ~~2012~~2013, respectively.

~~From time~~Accounts ~~to time, accounts~~ receivable are regularly reviewed for changes from the historic collection experience to ensure the appropriateness of the allowances. These estimates have been relatively accurate in the past and currently there is no need to revise such estimates. However, we will review such estimates more frequently when needed, and make revisions if necessary. The continuation or intensification of the credit ~~current~~tightening ~~global~~in ~~economic~~China ~~crisis~~ and ~~turmoil~~the inslowdown of the ~~global~~Chinese ~~financial~~economy ~~markets~~had ~~may~~and will continue to have negative consequences ~~for~~on the ~~business~~ business operations of our customers and adversely impact their ability to meet their financial obligations to us. A significant change in our collection experience, deterioration in the aging of receivables and collection difficulties could require that we increase our estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts. Any such additional bad debt charges could materially and adversely affect our future operating results.

6. Inventories

ASC 330-10-35, “Adjustments to Lower of Cost or Market”, requires us to reduce the carrying value of inventory when there is evidence that the utility of goods will be less than cost, whether due to physical deterioration, obsolescence, changes in price levels or other causes. The Company recorded inventory write-downs in the amounts of $nil and $~~642~~400,~~884~~762 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These amounts were recognized as a loss inof ~~each~~the ~~respective~~current period.

As of ~~March~~September 3130, 2013 and June 30, ~~2012~~2013, inventories consisted of the following:

At cost:	March 31, 2013			June 30, 2012
	September 30, 2013			June 30, 2013
Raw materials	$	2,992,788		$	1,711,735
At cost:
Work in progress		2,138,399			1,064,229
Raw materials	$	1,294,882		$	1,502,235
Finished goods		9,355,802			6,409,395
Work in progress		384,342			1,483,490
Consumable items		6,477,749			6,727,183
Finished goods		8,865,491			7,383,617
		20,964,738			15,912,542
Consumable items		6,955,879			6,405,554
Less: provision		(405,172	)		(396,322	)
		17,500,594			16,774,896
	$	20,559,566		$	15,516,220
Less: provision		(940,453	)		(937,695	)
	$	16,560,141		$	15,837,201

Costs of finished goods include direct labor, direct materials, and production overhead before the goods are ready for sale.

F-11

Costs of finished goods include direct labor, direct materials, and production overhead before the goods are ready for sale.

Consumable items represent parts used in our cold rolling mills and other equipment that need to be replaced from time to time when necessary to ensure optimal operating results, such as bearings and rollers.

Inventories amounting to $7,~~029~~327,~~769~~441 (June 30, ~~2012~~2013: $6,~~299~~832,~~566~~699) were pledged for short-term loans totaling $19,~~605~~915,~~714~~518 at ~~March~~September 3130, 2013 (June 30, ~~2012~~2013: $19,~~354~~857,~~534~~110).

7. Advances to Suppliers

Cash advances are shown net of allowances of $419,~~726~~803,~~554~~917 and $419,~~623~~689,~~323~~609 at ~~March~~September 3130, 2013 and June 30, ~~2012~~2013, respectively.

Due to an overall negative operating environment for steel businesses in China at present, caused by oversupply, increased cost of imported iron ore and tightened credit, we will regularly review our suppliers and our policy for provision for allowance for advances to suppliers to reflect changes from our historic raw materials receipt experience and to ensure the appropriateness of the allowance in light of the circumstances present at the time of the review.

8. Property, Plant and Equipment

Property, plant and equipment, stated at cost less accumulated depreciation, consisted of the following:

	March 31, 2013			June 30, 2012
	September 30, 2013			June 30, 2013
Plant and machinery	$	7880,~~848~~387,~~255~~064		$	7780,~~064~~161,~~727~~729
Buildings		2324,~~961~~340,~~479~~111			2324,~~438~~268,~~143~~727
Motor vehicles		~~666~~736,~~144~~925			~~651~~734,~~595~~764
Office equipment		~~551~~559,~~368~~122			~~539~~564,~~416~~087
		104,027,246			101,693,881
		106,023,222			105,729,307
Less: Accumulated depreciation		(4146,~~607~~733,~~764~~738	)		(3344,~~940~~362,~~890~~562	)
	$	6259,~~419~~289,~~482~~484		$	6761,~~752~~366,~~991~~745

Depreciation expense related to manufacturing is included as a component of cost of goods sold. During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013 and 2012, depreciation totaling $41,~~663~~454,~~500~~038 and $41,~~543~~782,~~995~~079, respectively, was included as a component of cost of goods sold.

Plant and machinery amounting to $3130,~~818~~412,~~925~~371 (June 30, ~~2012~~2013: $3431,~~533~~431,~~411~~182) and $1716,~~956~~889,~~101~~524 (June 30, ~~2012~~2013: $1917,~~514~~513,~~340~~168) were pledged for short-term loans totaling $2728,~~673~~111,~~871~~165 and long-term ~~loans~~loan including current portion totaling $16,200,000, respectively, at ~~March~~ 31September 30, 2013 (June 30, ~~2012~~2013: $2728,~~246~~028,~~477~~722 and $16,200,000, respectively).

9. Construction-In-Progress

As of ~~March~~September 3130, 2013 and June 30, ~~2012~~2013, construction-in-progress consisted of the following:

	March 31, 2013		June 30, 2012
	September 30, 2013		June 30, 2013
Construction costs	$	~~245~~280,~~692~~046	$	~~233~~255,~~512~~996

Construction-in-progress represents construction and installations of annealing furnaces.

F-12

10. Intangible Assets

Land use rights amounting to $1,~~887~~895,~~457~~730 (June 30, ~~2012~~2013: $1,~~877~~900,~~363~~914) were pledged for short-term loans totaling $2728,~~673~~111,~~871~~165 at ~~March 31~~September 30, 2013 (June 30, ~~2012~~ 2013: $2728,~~246~~028,~~477~~722).

The Company acquired land use rights in August 2004 and December 2006 for 50 years that expire in August 2054 and December 2056, respectively. The land use rights are amortized over a fifty-year term. An amortization amount of approximately $37,000 is to be recorded each year starting from the financial year ended June 30, 2009 for the remaining lease period.

Amortizable intangible assets of the Company are reviewed when there are triggering events to determine whether their carrying value has become impaired, in conformity with ASC 360. The Company also re-evaluates the periods of amortization to determine whether subsequent events and circumstances warrant revised estimates of useful lives.

F-12

11. Short-Term Loans

Short-term loans consisted of the following:

	March 31, 2013		June 30, 2012
	September 30, 2013		June 30, 2013
Loan dated June 29, 2011, due July 31, 2012, with an interest rate at 115% of the standard market rate set by the People’s Bank of China (“PBOC”) (6.9% at March 31, 2013) per annum (Notes 6 and 8)	$	8,068,157	$	7,891,943
Bank loan dated June 29, 2011, due July 31, 2012, with an interest rate at 115% of the standard market rate set by the People’s Bank of China (“PBOC”) (6.9% at September 30, 2013) per annum (Notes 6 and 8)		8,195,647		8,171,612
Bank loan dated June 29, 2011, due July 31, 2012 with an interest rate at 115% of the standard market rate set by PBOC (6.9% at March 31, 2013) per annum (Notes 6, 8 and 10)		19,605,714		19,354,534
Bank loan dated June 29, 2011, due July 31, 2012 with an interest rate at 115% of the standard market rate set by PBOC (6.9% at September 30, 2013) per annum (Notes 6, 8 and 10)		19,915,518		19,857,110
	$	2728,~~673~~111,~~871~~165	$	2728,~~246~~028,~~477~~722

The above bank loans outstanding at ~~March~~September 3130, 2013 are Renminbi (“RMB”) loans. Other than the bank loan dated January 19, 2011 that was secured by bills receivable, all other short-term loans carry an interest rate of 1.15 times of the standard market rate set by the PBOC, and are secured by inventories, land use rights, buildings and plant and machinery, and guaranteed by PSHL and our former Chairman, Mr. Wo Hing Li. In addition, pursuant to a bank loan agreement entered into between the Company and ~~Raiffeisen Zentralbank Osterreich~~ RaiffeisenZentralbankOsterreich AG (“RZB”), Mr. Li undertakes to maintain a shareholding percentage in the Company of not less than 33.4% unless otherwise agreed to with RZB.

The weighted-average interest rate on short-term loans at ~~March~~September 3130, 2013 and ~~2012~~June 30, 2013 was 6.9% and 7.5426%, respectively. Principal and ~~interest~~ interest under the short-term loans totaling $2728,~~610~~111,~~356~~165 with RZB were to be repaid in full on July 31, 2012, but the Company has defaulted on this repayment obligation. The Company is currently in discussions with RZB regarding the restructuring of the loans for repayment but has not yet agreed on specific terms. Any restructuring will be subject to approval by RZB’s governing bodies, and to the Company’s ability to meet certain conditions and requirements that may be imposed by the Bank. RZB also has the right to take possession of the collateral granted in connection with ~~their~~its respective loan agreements, which action would have a material adverse impact on the Company.

As part of the ongoing discussions with RZB to potentially restructure our short-term loans, we have implemented and will continue to implement a series of measures to remain viable and improve overall profitability including expanding our customer base to increase total demand, strategizing our product mix to re-focus on our competitive advantage and niche capabilities including the ultra-thin low-carbon and high strength high-carbon products ~~and~~, improve our production management and increase quality control, and continuing to carry out research and development (“R&D”) to improve profitability of existing products and launch new high value-add products. ~~The Company also made a partial repayment for its short-term loan from the deposit account held with RZB during the nine months ended March 31, 2013.~~

12. Long-Term Loan – Current Portion

		March 31, 2013				June 30, 2012
Bank loan dated June 29, 2010, due June 15, 2016 with an interest rate of the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 4.5% (4.96% at March 31, 2013) per annum (Note 8)		$	16,200,000			$	16,200,000

On January 29, 2010, Shanghai Blessford entered into a Senior Loan Agreement with DEG -Deutsche Investitions-Und Entwicklungsgesellschaft Mbh (“DEG”) for a loan amount up to $18,000,000 at an annual interest rate of 4.5% above the six-month USD LIBOR rate. The loan is to be repaid semi-annually over five years starting on December 15, 2011 and is secured by a mortgage on the cold rolling line and annealing furnaces at Shanghai Blessford’s facilities and guaranteed by the Company.

F-13

~~In June~~12. ~~2012, the Company has defaulted on its semi~~Long-~~annual~~Term ~~principal~~Loan ~~and~~– ~~interest repayment obligation. The Company is currently~~Current in discussions with DEG regarding the restructuring of the loans for repayment but has not yet agreed on specific terms. Until such agreement is reached, DEG has the right to cancel the total outstanding commitment of the loan, demand immediate repayment of all or part of the loan with accrued interest, and/or terminate the loan agreement. DEG also has the right to take possession of the collateral granted in connection with its respective loan agreements, which action would have a material adverse impact on the Company.Portion

		September 30, 2013				June 30, 2013
Bank loan dated June 29, 2010, due June 15, 2016 with an interest rate of the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 4.5% (4.893% at September 30, 2013) per annum (Note 8)		$	16,200,000			$	16,200,000

On January 29, 2010, Shanghai Blessford entered into a Senior Loan Agreement with DEG-Deutsche Investitions-Und EntwicklungsgesellschaftMbh (“DEG”) for a loan amount up to $18,000,000 at an annual interest rate of 4.5% above the six-month USD LIBOR rate. The loan is to be repaid semi-annually over five years starting on December 15, 2011 and is secured by a mortgage on the new cold rolling line and annealing furnaces at Shanghai Blessford’s facilities and guaranteed by the Company.

In June 2012, the Company defaulted on its semi-annual principal and interest repayment obligation. The Company is currently in discussions with DEG regarding a possibility to restructure the loan for repayment but has not yet agreed on specific terms. Until such agreement is reached, DEG has the right to cancel the total outstanding commitment of the loan, demand immediate repayment of all or part of the loan with accrued interest, and/or terminate the loan agreement. DEG also has the right to take possession of the collateral granted in connection with its respective loan agreements, which action would have a material adverse impact on the Company.

13. Stockholders’ Equity

Reverse Stock Split

In June 2012, the stockholders of the Company approved the authority of the Company’s Board of Directors to effect a one-for-twelve reverse stock split of the Company’s outstanding common stock. The reverse stock split became effective on August 27, 2012 and as a result of the reverse stock split, the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock decreased to 3,880,866 shares, without any change in the par value of such shares. These consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements give retroactive effect to the reverse stock split for all periods presented.

~~Stock~~Reduction in Authorized ~~Warrants~~Shares

~~On November~~In 6,June ~~2007~~2013, inthe stockholders ~~connection~~of ~~with~~the Company approved the ~~Subscription~~authority ~~Agreement,~~of the Company’s ~~issued~~Board of Directors to ~~certain~~amend the ~~institutional~~Company’s ~~accredited~~Amended ~~investors warrants~~and Restated Articles of Incorporation to ~~purchase~~reduce ~~118,333~~the number of shares of ~~Common~~common ~~Stock~~stock ~~valued~~and atpreferred stock. $5On August 27,~~374~~ 2013,~~748,~~ ~~and~~the ~~Roth~~Company’s ~~Capital~~Board ~~Partners,~~of ~~LLC,~~Directors asapproved ~~placement~~an ~~agent,~~amendment of our Amended and Restated Articles ~~received~~of ~~warrants~~Incorporation to ~~purchase~~effect 18a reduction in the number of authorized shares of the Company’s common stock and preferred stock to (i) 10,~~800~~000,000 shares of ~~Common~~common ~~Stock~~stock, ~~valued~~par atvalue $~~887,504~~0.001 ~~These~~per ~~amounts~~share ~~were~~and ~~recorded~~(ii) as500,000 ~~syndication~~shares ~~fees offsetting~~of ~~additional~~preferred ~~paid-in~~stock, ~~capital~~par value $0.001 per ~~Warrants~~share. ~~issued~~The toamendment ~~Roth~~became ~~Capital~~effective ~~were~~upon ~~not~~filing ~~exercised~~with ~~and~~the ~~expired~~Delaware Secretary of State on ~~November~~September 56, ~~2010~~2013.

Information with respect to stock warrants outstanding is as follows:

Exercise Price				Outstanding June 30, 2012				Granted				Expired or Exercised				Outstanding March 31, 2013				Expiration Date
$	101.40				118,333				-0-				-0-				118,333			May 5, 2013

14. Income Taxes

~~For~~Significant components ~~PRC~~of ~~enterprise income tax reporting purposes,~~ the ~~Company~~Group’s isdeferred ~~required~~tax toassets ~~compute~~and aliabilities ~~10%~~as ~~salvage~~of ~~value~~September ~~when~~30, ~~computing~~2013 ~~depreciation expense~~ and ~~add~~June ~~back the allowance for doubtful debts. For financial reporting purposes~~30, ~~the~~2013 ~~Company~~are ~~does~~as ~~not take into account a 10% salvage value when computing depreciation expenses.~~follows:

The tax holiday resulted in tax savings as follows:

	September 30, 2013			June 30, 2013
Deferred tax assets and liabilities:
Net operating loss carried forward	$	12,328,700		$	11,247,441
Temporary differences resulting from allowances		14,136,799			12,805,597
Net deferred income tax asset	$	26,465,499		$	24,053,038
Valuation allowance		(26,465,499	)		(24,053,038	)
	$	-		$	-

	Nine months ended March 31
	2013		2012
Tax savings	$	-	$	-
Benefit per share
Basic	$	0.00	$	0.00
Diluted	$	0.00	$	0.00

The Company has not recognized a deferred tax liability as its foreign subsidiaries do not have any undistributed earnings as of September 30, 2013. A deferred tax liability will be recognized when the Company no longer plans to permanently reinvest undistributed earnings.

Significant components of the Group’s deferred tax assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2013 and June 30, 2012 are as follows:

Deferred tax assets and liabilities:	March 31, 2013			June 30, 2012
Net operating loss carried forward	$	6,847,443		$	6,668,613
Temporary differences resulting from allowances		7,101,308			2,051,326
Net deferred income tax asset		13,948,751			8,719,939
Valuation allowance		(13,948,751	)		(8,719,939	)
	$	-		$	-

F-14

The Company has not recognized a deferred tax liability as its foreign subsidiaries do not have any undistributed earnings as of March 31, 2013. A deferred tax liability will be recognized when the Company has undistributed earnings and no longer plans to permanently reinvest undistributed earnings.

A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes with amounts determined by the PRC income tax rate to income tax expense per books is as follows:

	Nine months ended March 31
	Three months ended September 30,
	2013			2012
Computed tax at the PRC statutory rate of 25%	$	(72,~~280~~403,~~149~~987	)	$	(21,~~018~~080,~~204~~297	)
Valuation allowance		2,~~230~~412,~~154~~461			21,~~018~~450,~~190~~196
Expenses not deductible for tax		5,049,995			14
Income not subject to tax		(8,488	)		-
Overprovision		-			27,189
Expenses not deductible for tax		14			(369,899	)
Income tax expense per books	$	-			27,189
Income tax per books	$	-		$	-

Income tax expense consists of:

	Nine months ended March 31
	2013		2012
Income tax expense for the period – PRC	$	-	$	27,189
Deferred income tax benefit – PRC		-		-
Income tax expense per books	$	-	$	27,189

15. (Loss) Per Share

ASC 260-10 requires a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator of the basic and diluted (loss) per share (EPS) computations.

For the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~March~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2012, warrants to purchase 118,333 shares at an exercise price of $101.40 were not included as their effect would have been anti-dilutive~~, however, securities represented by the 118,333 warrants still outstanding could potentially dilute basic earnings per share in the future~~.

For the three and nine months ended March 31, 2012, warrants to purchase 118,333 shares at an exercise price of $101.40 were not included as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.

The following reconciles the components of the EPS computation:

	Income			Shares		Per Share
	(Numerator)			(Denominator)		Amount
For the three months ended March 31, 2013:
For the three months ended September 30, 2013:
Net loss	$	(13,487,395	)
Net (loss)	$	(9,577,140	)
Basic EPS loss available to common shareholders	$	(13,487,395	)		3,880,866	$	(3.48	)
Basic EPS (loss) available to common shareholders	$	(9,577,140	)		3,880,866	$	(2.47	)
Effect of dilutive securities:
Warrants					-
Diluted EPS loss available to common shareholders	$	(13,487,395	)		3,880,866	$	(3.48	)
Diluted EPS (loss) available to common shareholders	$	(9,577,140	)		3,880,866	$	(2.47	)
For the three months ended March 31, 2012:
For the three months ended September 30, 2012:
Net loss	$	(3,313,023	)
Net (loss)	$	(4,222,283	)
Basic EPS loss available to common shareholders	$	(3,313,023	)		3,880,866	$	(0.85	)
Basic EPS (loss) available to common shareholders	$	(4,222,283	)		3,880,866	$	(1.09	)
Effect of dilutive securities:
Warrants					-
Diluted EPS loss available to common shareholders	$	(3,313,023	)		3,880,866	$	(0.85	)
Diluted EPS (loss) available to common shareholders	$	(4,222,283	)		3,880,866	$	(1.09	)

F-15

	Income			Shares		Per Share
	(Numerator)			(Denominator)		Amount
For the nine months ended March 31, 2013:
Net loss	$	(28,594,183	)
Basic EPS loss available to common shareholders	$	(28,594,183	)		3,880,866	$	(7.37	)
Effect of dilutive securities:
Warrants					-
Diluted EPS loss available to common shareholders	$	(28,594,183	)		3,880,866	$	(7.37	)
For the nine months ended March 31, 2012:
Net loss	$	(7,930,040	)
Basic EPS income available to common shareholders	$	(7,930,040	)		3,880,866	$	(2.04	)
Effect of dilutive securities:
Warrants					-
Diluted EPS income available to common shareholders	$	(7,930,040	)		3,880,866	$	(2.04	)

16. Contingencies and Commitments

Legal Proceedings

The Company is subject to various legal proceedings and claims that have arisen in the ordinary course of business.

On March 15, 2012, the Company received notice of a complaint filed by a Mr. Haining Zhang and China Venture Partners, Inc. in the U.S. Southern District Court of New York on March 9, 2012, against several defendants, including the Company, as successor to OraLabs Holding Corp. In the complaint Mr. Zhang ~~is alleging~~alleges, among other things, breach of contract by the Company and certain of our former officers, directors and control persons, in connection with our December 2006 acquisition of Partner Success Holdings Limited. ~~Among other things,~~ Mr. Zhang asserts ~~alleges~~a ~~that~~breach ~~the~~of ~~defendants breached~~ an agreement to compensate him for services he allegedly performed in connection with seeking out a merger candidate for the Company. The Company ~~believes~~filed ~~that the suit is without merit and intends to vigorously defend its interests in the case. The Company was granted court permission to file~~ a motion to dismiss ~~the~~, ~~action~~ as ~~against~~did ~~it. Prior to filing~~ the ~~motion~~other ~~to dismiss~~defendants, ~~plaintiffs~~and ~~amended~~that ~~their~~motion ~~complaint.~~was ~~Accordingly,~~granted ~~the Company~~on ~~filed~~or aabout ~~motion to dismiss the amended complaint. On~~ March 13, 2013~~, the Company’s motions to dismiss were granted by the Court~~. The Plaintiff had the right to appeal within 30 days of the court decision, and ahas ~~notice~~done ~~of appeal was filed on April 17, 2013~~so. The Plaintiff has ~~the~~filed ~~obligation~~an toappellate ~~prepare~~brief ~~the record on appeal~~ and ~~have~~ the ~~same~~Company ~~submitted~~has tofiled ~~the~~a ~~Court~~brief ofin ~~Appeals~~opposition. We ~~intend~~ toexpect ~~file~~ a ~~notice~~decision towithin ~~oppose~~the ~~such~~next ~~appeal.~~eight (8) months. Although an estimate of any potential loss cannot be made at this time, the Company does not believe that its business or financial condition is materially adversely affected.

F-15

In addition to the above, certain former officers and directors have filed a lawsuit against the Company claiming that they are entitled to defense and indemnification from the Company for the claims of Mr. Zhang and China Venture Partners. Because the underlying case was dismissed without any award to the plaintiffs, these former officers and directors are seeking to recover their costs and attorney’s fees expended in defending against the claims of Mr. Zhang and China Venture Partners. This action is in its early stages. Although an estimate of any potential loss cannot be made at this time, the Company does not believe that its business or financial condition is or will be materially adversely affected.

Capital Commitments

As of ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, the Company did not have any capital commitments (June 30, ~~2012~~2013: $nil).

17. Impairment

We determine impairment of long-lived assets, including property, plant and equipment and amortizable intangible assets, by measuring the estimated undiscounted future cash flows generated by these assets, comparing the result to the assets’ carrying values and, if necessary, adjusting the assets to the lower of its carrying value or fair value and charging current operations for the measured impairment. The determination of the undiscounted future cash flows and fair value of these assets are subject to significant judgment.

The assets are subject to impairment consideration under ASC 360-10-35-17 if events or circumstances indicate that their carrying amounts might not be recoverable. In accordance with ~~ASC 360~~ASC360, as of ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, as the Company’s market capitalization was lower than the carrying value of its assets and the Company experienced continuing losses, management performed an impairment test pursuant to the guidance outlined in ~~ASC~~ ASC 360-10-35-21 and no impairment charges were recognized for the ~~relevant~~current ~~year~~period. As of ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, the Company expects these assets to be fully recoverable based on the result of the impairment test. Goodwill amounting to $99,999 as at ~~March~~September 3130, 2013 was considered immaterial and not tested for impairment in accordance with ASC 350.

F-16

18. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~December~~ ~~2011~~July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. ~~2011~~2013-11, ~~Disclosures~~Presentation ~~About~~of ~~Offsetting~~an ~~Assets~~Unrecognized ~~and~~Tax ~~Liabilities,~~Benefit ~~(“ASU~~When ~~2011-11”). The~~a ~~amendments~~Net inOperating ~~ASU~~Loss ~~2011-11~~Carryforward, ~~require~~a ~~entities~~Similar Tax toLoss, ~~disclose~~or ~~information~~a ~~about~~Tax ~~offsetting~~Credit ~~and~~Carryforward ~~related~~Exists ~~arrangements~~(“ASU to2013-11”). ~~enable~~The ~~users~~ objective of ~~financial~~ASU ~~statements~~2013-11is to ~~understand~~eliminate the diversities ~~effect~~that ofexist ~~those~~in ~~arrangements on an entity’s~~ financial ~~position~~statement presentation. The amendments ~~require~~ ~~enhanced~~aim ~~disclosures~~at byattaining ~~requiring~~this ~~improved~~objective ~~information~~by ~~about~~giving ~~financial instruments and derivative instruments that are~~explicit ~~either~~guidance ~~(i)~~on ~~offset~~the infinancial ~~accordance~~statement ~~with~~presentation ~~current~~of ~~literature~~an orunrecognized ~~(ii)~~tax ~~subject~~benefit towhen ana ~~enforceable~~net ~~master~~operating ~~netting~~loss ~~arrangement~~carryforward, ora similar ~~agreement~~tax loss, ~~irrespective~~or ofa ~~whether~~tax ~~they~~credit ~~are~~carryforward ~~offset~~exists. inThe ~~accordance~~amendments ~~with~~in ~~current~~this ~~literature.~~Update ~~ASU~~are ~~2011-11 is~~ effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning ~~on or~~ after ~~January~~December 115, 2013. ~~This~~The ~~standard~~amendments ~~will~~of ~~become~~ASU ~~effective~~2013-11, ~~for the~~when ~~Company beginning July 1~~adopted, ~~2013.~~are ~~The Company does~~ not ~~believe~~expected ~~adoption~~to ~~of this new guidance will~~ have a material ~~significant~~ impact on ~~its~~the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

~~In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012~~F-02, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment (“ASU 2012-02”). ASU 2012-02 amends Topic 350 by establishing an optional two-step analysis for impairment testing of indefinite-lived intangibles other than goodwill. This update allows an entity the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test. Under that option, an entity no longer would be required to calculate the fair value of the intangible asset unless the entity determines, based on that qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. ASU 2012-02 is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012 and early adoption is permitted. This standard will become effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2013. The Company does not believe adoption of this new guidance will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.16

In February 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-02, “Reporting of Amounts Reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income” (ASU No. 2013-02). Under ASU No. 2013-02, an entity is required to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) by component. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the financial statements or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of AOCI by the respective line items of net income, but only if the amount reclassified is required to be reclassified in its entirety in the same reporting period. For amounts that are not required to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures that provide additional details about those amounts. ASU No. 2013-02 does not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in the financial statements. ASU No. 2013-02 became effective from January 1, 2013 and the new guidance did not have any material impact on the Company’s unaudited consolidated financial statements.

F-17

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

Special Note Regarding Forward Looking Statements

In addition to historical information, this report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We use words such as “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “project,” “target,” “plan,” “optimistic,” “intend,” “aim,” “will” or similar expressions which are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements include, among others, those concerning market and industry segment growth and demand and acceptance of new and existing products; any projections of sales, earnings, revenue, margins or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations; and any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance, as well as all assumptions, expectations, predictions, intentions or beliefs about future events. You are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions, which, if they were to ever materialize or prove incorrect, could cause the results of the Company to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Potential risks and uncertainties include, among other things, factors such as: plans to expand our exports outside of China; plans to increase our production capacity and the anticipated dates that such facilities may commence operations; our ability to obtain additional funding for our continuing operations and to fund our expansion; our ability to meet our financial projections for any financial year; our ability to retain our key executives and to hire additional senior management; continued growth of the Chinese economy and industries demanding our products; our ability to secure at acceptable prices the raw materials we need to produce our products; political changes in China that may impact our ability to produce and sell our products in our target markets; general business conditions and competitive factors, including pricing pressures and product development; and changes in our relationships with customers and suppliers. You should carefully review the risk factors described in other documents we file from time to time with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, including our Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended June 30, ~~2012~~2013.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and the related notes that appear in Part I, Item 1, “Financial Statements,” of this quarterly report. Our unaudited consolidated financial statements are stated in United States Dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The following discussion and analysis covers the Company’s unaudited consolidated financial condition at ~~March 31~~September 30, 2013 and June 30, ~~2012~~2013, the end of its prior fiscal year, and its unaudited consolidated results of operation for the three ~~and nine~~ months ended ~~March 31~~September 30, 2013 and 2012.

Use of Terms

Except as otherwise indicated by the context, all references in this report to:

● “CPSL,” “Company,” “Group,” “we,” “us” or “our” are to China Precision Steel, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its direct and indirect subsidiaries; ● “PSHL” are to our subsidiary Partner Success Holdings Limited, a BVI company; ● “Blessford International” are to our subsidiary Blessford International Limited, a BVI company; ● “Shanghai Blessford” are to our subsidiary Shanghai Blessford Alloy Company Limited, a PRC company; ● “Chengtong” are to our subsidiary Shanghai Chengtong Precision Strip Company Limited, a PRC company; ● “Tuorong” are to our subsidiary Shanghai Tuorong Precision Strip Company Limited, a PRC company; ● “China” and “PRC” are to the People’s Republic of China; ● “BVI” are to the British Virgin Islands;

~~● “PSHL” are to our subsidiary Partner Success Holdings Limited, a BVI company;~~4

● “~~Blessford~~SEC” ~~International~~are to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission; ● “Securities Act” are to ~~our~~the ~~subsidiary~~Securities ~~Blessford~~Act ~~International~~of ~~Limited~~1933, aas ~~BVI~~amended; ~~company~~● “Exchange Act” are to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; ● “RMB” are to Renminbi, the legal currency of China; and ● “U.S. dollar,” “USD,” “US$” and “$” are to the legal currency of the United States.

● “Shanghai Blessford” are to our subsidiary Shanghai Blessford Alloy Company Limited, a PRC company;

● “Chengtong” are to our subsidiary Shanghai Chengtong Precision Strip Company Limited, a PRC company;

● “Tuorong” are to our subsidiary Shanghai Tuorong Precision Strip Company Limited, a PRC company;

● “China” and “PRC” are to the People’s Republic of China;

● “BVI” are to the British Virgin Islands;

● “SEC” are to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission;

● “Securities Act” are to the Securities Act of 1933, as amended;

● “Exchange Act” are to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended;

● “RMB” are to Renminbi, the legal currency of China; and

● “U.S. dollar,” “USD,” “US$” and “$” are to the legal currency of the United States.

Overview of the Company’s Business

We are a value-added steel processing company principally engaged in the manufacture and sale of high precision cold-rolled steel products, in the provision of heat treatment and in the cutting and slitting of medium and high-carbon hot-rolled steel strips. We use commodity steel to create a specialty premium steel. Specialty precision steel pertains to the precision of measurements and tolerances of thickness, shape, width, surface finish and other special quality features of highly engineered end-use applications.

We produce and sell precision ultra-thin and high strength cold-rolled steel products ranging from 7.5 mm to 0.03 mm. We also provide heat treatment and cutting and slitting of medium and high-carbon hot-rolled steel strips not exceeding 7.5 mm thickness. Our process puts hot-rolled de-scaled (pickled) steel coils through a cold-rolling mill, utilizing our patented systems and high technology reduction processing procedures, to make steel coils and sheets in customized thicknesses according to customer specifications. Currently, our precision products are mainly used in the manufacture of automobile parts and components, steel roofing, plane friction discs, appliances, food packaging materials, saw blades, textile needles, and micro electronics.

We conduct our operations principally in China through our wholly-owned operating subsidiaries, Chengtong and Shanghai Blessford, which are wholly owned subsidiaries of our direct subsidiary, PSHL. Most of our sales are made domestically in China; however, we began exporting during fiscal 2007 and our overseas market currently covers Indonesia, Thailand, the Caribbean, Nigeria, Ethiopia and Turkey. We intend to further expand into additional overseas markets in the future, subject to suitable market conditions and favorable regulatory controls.

To remodel our business to make it sustainable, we have implemented and will continue to implement a series of measures to remain viable and improve profitability. These measures include: (1) initiating additional sales and marketing efforts to expand our customer base and increase total demand; (2) strategizing our product mix to re-focus on our niche capabilities including the ultra-thin low-carbon and high-strength high-carbon products; (3) improve production management and increase quality control; (4) continuing to carry out R&D to improve profitability of existing products and launch new high value-add products; and (5) improving working capital efficiency by increasing turnovers of advances to suppliers and accounts receivables. We will also continue to take appropriate actions to perform business and credit reviews of customers and suppliers with the downward pressure in the Chinese economy and credit crunch which have caused many difficulties faced by businesses.

~~Third~~ First Quarter Financial Performance Highlights

During the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, ~~consistent~~ ~~with~~we ~~the~~saw ~~two~~a ~~prior~~substantial ~~fiscal~~increase ~~quarters,~~in weour ~~largely~~sales ~~reduced~~volume, ~~our~~period-on-period. ~~overall~~This ~~production~~is ~~volume~~a direct result of the ~~low-carbon~~measures ~~products~~we ~~as part~~have ofbeen ~~our~~taking ~~strategy~~during tothe ~~streamline~~past ~~production~~year ~~and~~including ~~reposition~~expanding ~~the~~customer ~~Company~~base inand ~~its~~improving ~~product~~production ~~offerings~~management, as mentioned above. However, as we further work ~~towards that~~to improve our operating results to achieve profitability, tightened credit and slowing growth in China continued to cause a negative impact on our business and a slow turnover of our accounts receivable for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, a trend that is strongly correlated to the experience of other companies in the coal and steel sectors in China during the past year.

During the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, we sold a total of 1020,~~264~~449 tons of products, aan ~~decrease~~increase of 2812,~~634~~696 tons from 387,~~898~~753 tons a year ago, ~~largely~~ due to ~~the~~increase ~~decrease~~ in domestic sales ofacross ~~low-carbon~~all ~~cold-rolled~~product ~~steel products mentioned above~~categories. Our average cost per unit sold ~~increased~~ 35decreased 24.5% while average selling prices ~~increased~~decreased 1025.01% period-on-period~~, mainly due to increases in factory overhead and direct labor per unit sold as a result of the substantially reduced units sold~~. ~~Decreased~~Low ~~sales~~average ~~volume~~selling price coupled with a large ~~provision~~allowance for ~~accounts~~bad ~~receivable~~and ~~bad~~doubtful debts of $95,~~665~~121,~~828~~777led ~~led~~ to a gross loss of $2,~~375~~994,~~307~~259 and a net loss of $139,~~487~~577,~~395~~140 for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013. Total company backlog as of ~~March~~ 31September 30, 2013 was $68,~~376~~165,~~456~~118.

In June and July 2012, we defaulted on the repayment obligations of our short-term and long-term bank loans totaling $43,873,871. We are currently in discussions with our banks regarding the restructuring of these loans for repayment but have not yet agreed on specific terms. Any restructuring will be subject to approval by the banks’ governing bodies, and to our ability to meet certain conditions and requirements that may be imposed by the banks. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully work out a repayment plan or otherwise fulfill its obligations under the loans. Each of the banks also have the right to take possession of the collateral (which collectively constitute substantial assets of the Company) granted in connection with their respective loan agreements, which action would have a material adverse impact on the Company. We have implemented and will continue to implement a series of measures, discussed above, to remodel our business to make it sustainable, and as part of the ongoing discussions with banks to potentially restructure our bank loans.

~~The~~In June ~~Company~~and ~~has~~July ~~suffered~~2012, awe ~~very~~defaulted ~~significant~~on the repayment obligations of our short-term and long-term bank loans totaling $44,311,165. ~~loss~~We are currently in discussions with our banks regarding the ~~period~~possibility ~~ended~~tore ~~March~~structure ~~31,~~these ~~2013.~~loans ~~Operating~~for ~~cash~~repayment ~~flows~~but have ~~also~~not yet ~~been~~agreed ~~significantly~~on ~~adversely~~specific ~~impacted~~terms. Any restructuring will be subject to approval by the ~~slow~~banks’ ~~turnover of~~governing bodies, and to our ~~accounts~~ability to ~~receivable~~meet certain conditions and ~~although~~requirements that may be imposed by the ~~Company~~banks. ~~has~~There ~~been~~can ~~renegotiating~~be ~~with~~no ~~its~~assurance ~~major~~that ~~suppliers~~the Company will be able to ~~get~~successfully work out a ~~partial~~repayment ~~refund~~plan ~~of our~~or ~~advances~~otherwise tofulfill ~~suppliers,~~its toobligations ~~date~~under wethe ~~have~~loans. ~~yet~~Each toof ~~receive~~the ~~any~~banks ~~substantial~~also have ~~refund~~the ~~due~~right to take possession of the ~~credit~~collateral ~~crunch~~(which incollectively constitutes substantial assets of the ~~Chinese~~Company) ~~steel~~granted ~~industry.~~in ~~There~~connection ~~can~~with betheir norespective ~~assurance~~loan ~~that~~agreements, which action would have a material adverse impact on the Company. ~~will~~We behave implemented ~~able~~and will continue to ~~generate~~implement ~~sufficient~~a ~~positive~~series ~~cash~~of ~~flow~~measures, ~~from~~discussed ~~operations~~above, to remodel our business to make it sustainable, ~~address~~and ~~all~~as part of ~~its~~the ~~cash~~ongoing ~~flow~~discussions ~~needs,~~with ~~and~~banks to ~~continue~~potentially asrestructure aour ~~going~~bank ~~concern~~loans.

The Company continued to suffer a significant loss in the period ended September 30, 2013. Operating cash flows have also been adversely impacted by the slow turnover of our accounts receivable. We also expect the ongoing credit tightening in China and the slowdown of the Chinese economy to continue to have negative consequences on the business operations of our customers and suppliers and adversely impact their ability to meet their financial obligations to us. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to generate sufficient positive cash flow from operations to address all of its cash flow needs, and to continue as a going concern.

The following are some financial highlights for the third fiscal quarter:

● Revenues: Our revenues were approximately $11.8 million for the quarter, an increase of 97.5% from last year. ● Gross Margin: Gross margin was (25.4%) for the quarter, compared to (24.6%) last year. ● Loss from operations before tax: Loss from operations before tax was approximately $9.6 million for the quarter, compared to a ~~decrease~~loss of 71approximately $4.0%2 ~~from~~million last year. ● Net loss: Net loss was approximately $9.6 million for the quarter, compared to a net loss of approximately $4.2 million last year. ● Fully diluted loss per share: Fully diluted loss per share was $2.47 for the quarter, compared to a loss per share of $1.09 last year.

● Gross Margin: Gross margin was (27.7%) for the quarter, compared to (3.8%) last year.

● Loss from operations before tax: Loss from operations before tax was approximately $12.7 million for the quarter, compared to a loss of approximately $2.5 million last year.

● Net loss: Net loss was approximately $13.5 million for the quarter, compared to a net loss of approximately $3.3 million last year.

● Fully diluted loss per share: Fully diluted loss per share was $3.48 for the quarter, compared to a loss per share of $0.85 last year.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth key components of our results of operations for the ~~periods~~three ~~indicated~~months ended September 30, in2013 ~~USD~~and 2012 and as a percentage of revenues.

~~Comparison of Three and nine months~~(All ~~Ended~~amounts ~~March~~in ~~31,~~U.S. ~~2013 and 2012~~dollars)

	Three Months Ended March 31,												Nine months Ended March 31,
	2013						2012
	2013						2012						2013						2012
	Amount			% of Revenues			Amount			% of Revenues
	Amount			% of Revenues			Amount			% of Revenues			Amount			% of Revenues			Amount			% of Revenues
Sales Revenues		11,765,387			100.0			5,956,760			100.0
Revenues	$	8,563,497			100.0		$	29,494,865			100.0		$	22,684,524			100.0		$	105,324,043			100.0
Cost of goods sold (including depreciation and amortization)		14,759,646			125.4			7,423,709			124.6
Cost of sales (including depreciation and amortization)		10,938,804			127.7			30,612,073			103.8			27,828,738			122.7			108,178,198			102.7
Gross (loss)		(2,994,259	)		(25.4	)		(1,466,949	)		(24.6	)
Gross (loss)		(2,375,307	)		(27.7	)		(1,117,208	)		(3.8	)		(5,144,214	)		(22.7	)		(2,854,155	)		(2.7	)
Selling expenses		31,168			0.3			29,273			0.5
Selling and marketing expenses		31,901			0.4			63,734			0.2			86,237			0.4			172,223			0.2
Administrative expenses		447,431			3.8			442,615			7.4
Administrative expenses		576,091			6.7			781,221			2.6			1,420,503			6.3			2,007,777			1.9
Allowance for bad and doubtful debts		5,121,777			43.5			1,373,000			23.0
Allowance for bad and doubtful debts		9,665,828			112.9			522,118			1.8			19,825,042			87.4			522,118			0.5
Depreciation and amortization expense		48,142			0.4			51,961			0.9
Depreciation and amortization expense		51,742			0.6			54,173			0.2			155,753			0.7			162,610			0.2
(Loss) from operations		(8,642,777	)		(73.5	)		(3,363,798	)		(56.5	)
Total operating expenses		10,325,562			120.6			1,421,246			4.8			21,487,535			94.7			2,864,728			2.7
Total other expense		(934,363	)		(7.9	)		(858,485	)		(14.4	)
(Loss) from operations		(12,700,869	)		(148.3	)		(2,538,454	)		(8.6	)		(26,631,749	)		(117.4	)		(5,718,883	)		(5.4	)
(Loss) from operations before income tax		(9,577,140	)		(81.4	)		(4,222,283	)		(70.9	)
Other revenues		70,743			0.8			20,434			0.1			678,500			3.0			89,505			0.1
Income tax expense		-			-			-			-
Interest and finance costs		(857,269	)		(10.0	)		(794,895	)		(2.7	)		(2,640,934	)		(11.6	)		(2,273,473	)		(2.2	)
Net (loss)		(9,577,140	)		(81.4	)		(4,222,283	)		(70.9	)
Total other (expense)		(786,526	)		(9.2	)		(774,461	)		(2.6	)		(1,962,434	)		(8.7	)		(2,183,968	)		(2.1	)
Basic (loss) per share		(2.47	)					(1.09	)
(Loss) before income taxes		(13,487,395	)		(157.5	)		(3,312,915	)		(11.2	)		(28,594,183	)		(126.1	)		(7,902,851	)		(7.5	)
Diluted (loss) per share		(2.47	)					(1.09	)
Income tax (benefit)/expense		-			-			108			<0.1			-			-			27,189			<0.1
Net (loss)	$	(13,487,395	)		(157.5	)	$	(3,313,023	)		(11.2	)	$	(28,594,183	)		(126.1	)	$	(7,930,040	)		(7.5	)
Basic (loss) per share	$	(3.48	)				$	(0.85	)				$	(7.37	)				$	(2.04	)
Diluted (loss) per share	$	(3.48	)				$	(0.85	)				$	(7.37	)				$	(2.04	)

Sales Revenues.

Sales volume decreased by 28,634 tons, or 73.6%, period-on-period, to 10,264 tons for the three months ended March 31, 2013, from 38,898 tons for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and as a result, sales revenues decreased by $20,931,368, or 71.0%, period-on-period, to $8,563,497 for the three months ended March 31, 2013, from $29,494,865 for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The decrease in sales revenues period-on-period is mainly attributable to the decrease in production and sales of our low-carbon cold-rolled products in an effort to reduce the sales of these loss-making products and restructure our product offerings.

Sales Revenues

Sales volume increased by 12,696 tons, or 163.7%, period-on-period, to 20,449 tons for the three months ended September 30, 2013, from 7,753 tons for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and as a result, sales revenues increased by $5,808,627, or 97.5%, period-on-period, to $11,765,387 for the three months ended September 30, 2013, from $5,956,760 for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The increase in sales revenues period-on-period is mainly attributable to the increase in production and sales as a result of management’s sales and marketing efforts in the domestic market, as detailed more fully below.

Sales by Product Line

A break-down of our sales by product line for the ~~three~~periods ~~months~~ ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:

	Three Months ended March 31,
	2013						2012
	2013						2012							Period-on-
Product Category	Quantity (tons)		$ Amount		% of Sales		Quantity (tons)			$ Amount		% of Sales		Period-on- Period Qty. Variance
	Quantity				% of		Quantity					% of		Period Qty.
Low carbon hard-rolled		442		407,106		4		1,470			1,133,619		19		(1,028	)
Product Category	(tons)		$ Amount		Sales		(tons)			$ Amount		Sales		Variance
Low carbon cold-rolled		11,047		5,818,783		49		3,513			2,047,911		34		7,534
Low-carbon hard-rolled		1,061		722,340		9		2,245			1,597,893		5		(1,184	)
High-carbon hot-rolled		3,695		982,361		8		37			13,197		<1%		3,658
Low-carbon cold-rolled		4,136		3,437,778		40		32,971			23,828,512		81		(28,835	)
High-carbon cold-rolled		4,850		4,118,910		35		2,838			2,545,164		43		2,012
High-carbon hot-rolled		270		206,840		2		144			133,371		<1		126
Subcontracting income		415		66,385		1		(105	)		9,024		<1%		520
High-carbon cold-rolled		3,990		3,279,644		38		3,464			3,384,305		11		526
Sales of scrap metal		-		371,842		3		-			207,845		4		-
Subcontracting income		807		42,228		1		74			10,374		<1		733
Total		20,449		11,765,387		100		7,753			5,956,760		100		12,696
Sales of scrap metal		-		874,667		10		-			540,410		2		-
Total		10,264		8,563,497		100		38,898			29,494,865		100		(28,634	)

During the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, ~~domestic~~ sales ~~were~~increased ~~stable~~across in all product categories ~~except~~for ~~low-carbon~~domestic ~~products~~sales, but due to a strong RMB against USD, export sales were negatively impacted. Low-carbon cold-rolled steel products accounted for 4049% of the current sales mix at an average selling price of $~~831~~527 per ton for the three months ended ~~March~~ 31September 30, 2013, compared to 8134% of the sales mix at an average selling price per ton of $~~723~~583 for the three months ended ~~March 31~~September 30, 2012. ~~The decrease in sales in this category during the quarter was mainly due to streamlined production to reduce the sales of these loss-making products.~~ Low-carbon hard-rolled steel products accounted for 94% of the current sales mix at an average selling price of $~~681~~921 per ton for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, compared to 519% of the sales mix at an average selling price per ton of $~~712~~771 for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2012,. Although ~~due~~average toselling aprice ~~decrease~~increased inperiod-on-period, there was less demand infor ~~the~~this export ~~market~~category ~~during~~due ~~the~~to ~~period~~a strong RMB against USD. High-carbon cold-rolled steel products accounted for 3835% of the current sales mix at an average selling price of $~~822~~849 per ton for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, compared to 1143% of the sales mix at an average selling price of $~~977~~ 897 for the three months ended ~~March 31~~September 30, 2012. The products in this category are mainly used in the automobile industry and wethe increase ~~intend~~in tosales ~~dedicate~~volume ~~further~~period-on-period was a result of our sales and marketing efforts targeted at the automobiles components manufactures in ~~this~~the ~~category~~PRC asmarket. ~~this~~We believe there is ~~where~~growth weopportunity ~~differentiate~~in ~~our~~this ~~products~~market ~~from~~segment ~~other~~and ~~domestic~~will ~~manufacturers~~continue to expand our customer base. Subcontracting income revenues accounted for $4266,~~228~~385, or 1%, of the sales mix for the three months ended ~~March 31~~September 30, 2013, anincreased ~~increase~~ from $109,~~374~~ 024, or less than 1%, of the sales mix for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2012, due to increased demand. The negative quantity in 2012 was due to the return of one batch of sample products with a small sales revenue.

	Three Months endedMarch 31,
	2013		2012		Variance
Average Selling Prices	($)		($)		($)			(%)
Low-carbon hard-rolled		681		712		(31	)		(4	)
Low-carbon cold-rolled		831		723		108			15
High-carbon hot-rolled		766		926		(160	)		(17	)
High-carbon cold-rolled		822		977		(155	)		(16	)
Subcontracting income		52		140		(88	)		(63	)

The average selling price per ton increased to $834 for the three months ended March 31, 2013, compared to $758 last year, representing an increase of $76, or 10.0%, period-on-period. This increase was mainly due to a change in product mix and concentration period-on-period. Average selling prices decreased across all product categories, except for low-carbon cold-rolled products, during the three months ended March 31, 2013.

	2013		2012			Variance
Average Selling Prices	($)		($)			($)			(%)
Low-carbon hard-rolled		921		771			150			19.5
Low-carbon cold-rolled		527		583			(56	)		(9.6	)
High-carbon hot-rolled		266		353			(87	)		(24.6	)
High-carbon cold-rolled		849		897			(48	)		(5.4	)
Subcontracting income		160		(86	)		246			(286.0	)

The average selling price per ton decreased to $575 for the three months ended September 30, 2013, compared to $768 in 2012, representing a decrease of $193, or 25.1%, period-on-period. This decrease was mainly due to decreases in general steel prices and therefore our selling prices during the quarter. Average selling prices decreased across all product categories during the three months ended September 30, 2013 except for low-carbon hard-rolled products.

Sales Breakdown by Major Customer

	2013						2012
Customers	$	$		% ~~ofSales~~of Sales			$	$		% ~~ofSales~~of Sales
Hangzhou Pugang Steel Materials Co., Ltd.		841,618			10			-	*		-	*
ChangshuJiacheng Steel Plating Co., Ltd.		1,939,400			16			699,359			12
Shanghai Changshuo Steel Co., Ltd.		823,983			10			-	*		-	*
Hangzhou Pugang Steel Materials Co., Ltd.		1,290,449			11			*			*
Shanghai Yanmao Trading Co., Ltd.		544,708			6			-	*		-	*
ZhangjiagangGangxin New Construction Materials Co., Ltd		1,056,134			9			*			*
Unimax & Far		541,374			6			-	*		-	*
SUMEC International Technology Co., Ltd.		786,920			7			*			*
Changshu Jiacheng Steel Plating Co., Ltd.		522,640			6			3,661,289			12
Shanghai WoziJintian Blade Co., Ltd		741,357			6			607,652			10
Shanghai Bayou Co., Ltd.		-	*		-	*		13,708,730			46
Unimax& Far Corporation		*			*			637,147			11
Jiangsu Sumec Group Corporation		-	*		-	*		3,495,647			12
Zhejiang Zhongwei Construction Materials Co., Ltd		*			*			489,025			8
Shanghai Shengdejia Metal Products Co., Ltd.		-	*		-	*		2,353,098			8
Steelforce NV		*			*			328,591			5
Zhejiang Yejin Materials Co., Ltd.		-	*		-	*		2,687,696			9
		5,814,260			49			2,761,774			46
		3,274,323			38			25,906,460			87
Others		5,951,127			51			3,194,986			54
Others		5,289,174			62			3,588,405			13
Total		11,765,387			100			5,956,760			100
Total		8,563,497			100			29,494,865			100

* Not major customers for the relevant periods

Sales revenue generated from our top five major customers as a percentage of total sales was 3849% for the three months ended ~~March 31~~September 30, 2013, as compared to 8746% in 2012. The change in customer mix reflects management’s continuous efforts in expanding our customer base and geographical coverage during the course of the quarter.

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of sales ~~decreased~~ increased by $197,~~673~~335,~~269~~937, or 6498.38%, period-on-period, to $1014,~~938~~759,~~804~~646 for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, from $307,~~612~~423,~~073~~709 for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2012. Cost of sales represented ~~127~~125.74% of sales revenues for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, compared to ~~103~~124.86% for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2012. Average cost per unit sold ~~increased~~ decreased to $~~1,066~~722 for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, compared to $~~787~~957 for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2012, representing a andecrease ~~increase~~ of $~~279~~235 per ton, or 35 24.5%, period-on-period.

	2013		2012		Variance
	($)		($)		($)			(%)
Cost of goods sold
- Raw materials		812,~~572~~020,~~999~~483		284,~~139~~435,~~271~~761		~~(19~~7,~~566~~584,~~272~~722	)		~~(69~~171.50	)
- Direct labor		~~120~~139,~~271~~908		~~132~~139,~~304~~068		~~(12,033~~840	)		(90.16	)
- Manufacturing overhead		2,~~245~~599,~~534~~255		2,~~340~~848,~~498~~880		(94249,~~964~~625	)		(48.18)	)
		10,938,804		30,612,073		(19,673,269	)		(64.3	)
		14,759,646		7,423,709		7,335,937			98.8
Cost per unit sold
Total units sold (tons)		1020,~~264~~449		387,~~898~~753		~~(28~~12,~~634~~696	)		~~(73~~163.68	)
Average cost per unit sold ($/ton)		~~1,066~~722		~~787~~957		~~279~~(235)			35(24.5)

The increase in average per unit cost of sales is represented by the combined effect of:

● an increase in factory overhead per unit sold of $159, or 265.0%, from $60 for the three months ended March 31, 2012, to $219 for the three months ended March 31, 2013;

● an increase in direct labor per unit sold of $9, or 300.0%, from $3 for the three months ended March 31, 2012, to $12 for the three months ended March 31, 2013, and;

● an increase in cost of raw materials per unit sold of $112, or 15.5%, from $723 for the three months ended March 31, 2012, to $835 for the three months ended March 31, 2013.

The ~~cost of raw materials~~ ~~consumed decreased by $19,566,272, or 69.5%, period-on-period, to $8,572,999 for the three months ended March 31, 2013, from $28,139,271 for the three months ended March 31, 2012. This~~ decrease ~~was~~in ~~mainly~~average ~~due~~per tounit acost ~~substantial~~of ~~decrease~~sales inis ~~total~~represented ~~units~~by ~~sold during~~ the ~~three~~ ~~months~~combined ~~ended~~effect ~~March 31, 2013.~~of:

~~Direct~~● ~~labor~~a ~~costs decreased~~decrease byin ~~$12,033,~~factory oroverhead ~~9.1%,~~per ~~period-on-period,~~unit tosold ~~$120,271~~of ~~for the three months ended March 31, 2013, from~~ $~~132~~240,~~304~~ ~~for the three months ended March 31, 2012. Manufacturing overhead costs decreased by $94,964,~~ or 465.14%, ~~period-on-period,~~from to $~~2,245,534~~ 367 for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2012, ~~from~~to $~~2,340,498~~127 for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, ~~2012.~~2013; ~~The~~● a decrease ~~was~~in ~~mainly attributable~~direct tolabor ~~the~~per ~~combined~~unit ~~effect~~sold of ~~a decrease in utilities of~~ $~~247~~11,~~047,~~ or 4161.51%, ~~period-on-period,~~from to $~~347,699~~18 for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2012, ~~from~~to $~~594,746~~7 for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, ~~2012~~2013, ~~and partially~~ offset by; ● an increase in ~~depreciation~~ cost of raw materials per unit sold of $~~219~~16,~~695~~ or 162.58%, ~~period-on-period,~~from to $~~1,549,594~~572 for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2012, ~~from~~to $~~1,329,899~~588 for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, ~~2012~~2013.

~~Gross~~The cost ~~Profit~~of raw materials consumed increased by $7,584,722, or 171.0%, period-on-period, to $12,020,483 for the three months ended September 30, 2013, from $4,435,761 for the three months ended September 30, 2012. This increase was mainly due to a substantial increase in total units sold during the three months ended September 30, 2013.

~~Gross profit in absolute~~Direct ~~terms~~labor costs decreased by $1840,~~258,099~~ or ~~112~~0.6%, period-on-period, to a$139,908 ~~gross~~for ~~loss~~the ofthree $2months ended September 30,~~375~~ 2013,~~307~~ from $139,068 for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2012. Manufacturing overhead costs decreased by $249,625, ~~2013~~or 8.8%, ~~from~~period-on-period, ato ~~gross~~$2,599,255 ~~loss~~for ofthe three months ended September 30, 2013, from $12,~~117~~848,~~208~~880 for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2012. ~~Gross~~The ~~profit~~decrease ~~margin~~was ~~decreased~~mainly attributable to ~~(27~~the combined effect of a decrease in depreciation of $328,041, or 18.74%), period-on-period, to $1,454,038 for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, from ~~(3.8%)~~ $1,782,079 for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2012., ~~The~~and ~~decrease~~partially inoffset ~~gross~~by ~~profit~~an ~~margin is~~increase ~~mainly~~in ~~attributable~~consumables toof a$106,755, 35or 33.53%, period-on-period, to ~~increase~~$427,372 infor ~~average~~the ~~cost~~three ~~per~~months ~~unit~~ended ~~sold~~September 30, 2013, from $320,617 for the three months ended September 30, 2012.

Gross Loss

Gross loss in absolute terms increased by $1,527,310 or 104.1%, period-on-period, to $2,994,259 for the three months ended September 30, 2013, from a gross loss of $1,466,949 for the three months ended September 30, 2012. Gross profit margin decreased to (25.4%) for the three months ended September 30, 2013, from (24.6%) for the three months ended September 30, 2012. The decrease in gross profit margin is mainly attributable to a 25.1% period-on-period decrease in average selling price.

Selling Expenses

Selling ~~expenses~~ ~~decreased~~expenses increased by $311,~~833~~895, or 496.95%, period-on-period, to $31,~~901~~168 for the three months ended ~~March 31~~September 30, 2013, from $6329,~~734~~273 for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, ~~2012~~2011. The ~~decrease~~increase was mainly attributable to ~~lower~~higher transportation costs and traveling expenses period-on-period.

Administrative Expenses

Administrative ~~expenses~~ ~~decreased~~expenses slightly increased by $~~205~~4,~~130~~816 or 261.31%, period-on-period, to $~~576~~447,~~091~~431 for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, compared to $~~781~~442,~~221~~ 615 for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, ~~2012~~2011. ~~This was mainly due to decreases in traveling expenses and professional fees period-on-period.~~

Allowance for Bad and Doubtful Debts

Allowance for bad and doubtful debts increased by $93,~~143~~748,~~710~~777, or ~~1,751~~273.30%, period-on-period. Allowance recognized for the three months ended ~~March~~ 31September 30, 2013 was in the amount of $95,~~665~~121,~~828~~777 in accordance with our policy for allowance for doubtful accounts.

Loss from Operations

Loss from operations increased by $105,~~162~~278,~~415~~979, or ~~400~~156.39%, period-on-period, to ~~a loss of~~ $128,~~700~~642,~~869~~777 for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, ~~from~~ from$23,~~538~~363,~~454~~798 for the three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2012, as a result of the factors discussed above.

Other Income

Other income increased by $50,309, or 246.2%, to $70,743 for the three months ended March 31, 2013, from $20,434 for the three months ended March 31, 2012.

Interest Expense

Total interest expense increased by $62,374, or 7.8%, to $857,269 for the three months ended March 31, 2013, from $794,895 for the three months ended March 31, 2012, due to the accrued late payment penalty interest as a result of the loan default.

Income Tax

For the three months ended March 31, 2013, we recognized no income tax expense, compared to an income tax expense of $108 for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The decrease of $108, or 100.0%, in income tax expense was a result of the net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2013.

Net Loss

Net loss increased by $10,174,372, or 307.1%, period-on-period, to $13,487,395 for the three months ended March 31, 2013, from $3,313,023 for the three months ended March 31, 2012. The increase in net loss is attributable to a combination of all the factors discussed above, principally the negative gross margin and the large increase in allowance for bad and doubtful debts.

Comparison of Nine months Ended March 31, 2013 and 2012

Sales Revenues.

Sales volume decreased by 95,631 tons, or 76.9%, period-on-period, to 28,722 tons for the nine months ended March 31, 2013, from 124,353 tons for the nine months ended March 31, 2012 and as a result, sales revenues decreased by $82,639,519, or 78.5%, period-on-period, to $22,684,524 for the nine months ended March 31, 2013, from $105,324,043 for the nine months ended March 31, 2012. The decrease in sales revenues period-on-period is mainly attributable to the decrease in production and sales of our low-carbon cold-rolled products in an effort to reduce the sales of these loss-making products.

Sales by Product Line

A break-down of our sales by product line for the nine months ended March 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:

	Nine months ended March 31,
	2013						2012						Period-on-
	Quantity				% of		Quantity				% of		Period Qty.
Product Category	(tons)		$ Amount		Sales		(tons)		$ Amount		Sales		Variance
Low-carbon hard-rolled		3,733		2,698,860		12		8,998		6,605,610		6		(5,265	)
Low-carbon cold-rolled		13,489		9,999,064		44		96,702		78,339,578		74		(83,213	)
High-carbon hot-rolled		449		324,509		1		3,321		3,659,608		4		(2,872	)
High-carbon cold-rolled		9,737		8,368,887		37		13,316		13,788,270		13		(3,579	)
Subcontracting income		1,314		83,020		1		2,016		1,076,389		1		(702	)
Sales of scrap metal		-		1,210,184		5		-		1,854,588		2		-
Total		28,722		22,684,524		100		124,353		105,324,043		100		(95,631	)

During the nine months ended March 31, 2013, sales decreased across all product categories. Low-carbon cold-rolled steel products accounted for 44% of the current sales mix at an average selling price of $741 per ton for the nine months ended March 31, 2013, compared to 74% of the sales mix at an average selling price per ton of $810 for the nine months ended March 31, 2012. The decrease in sales in this category during the nine months was mainly due to streamlined production to reduce the sales of these loss-making products. Low-carbon hard-rolled steel products accounted for 12% of the current sales mix at an average selling price of $723 per ton for the nine months ended March 31, 2013, compared to 6% of the sales mix at an average selling price per ton of $734 for the nine months ended March 31, 2012, due to a decrease in demand in the export market during the period. High-carbon cold-rolled steel products accounted for 37% of the current sales mix at an average selling price of $859 per ton for the nine months ended March 31, 2013, compared to 13% of the sales mix at an average selling price of $1,035 for the nine months ended March 31, 2012. The products in this category are mainly used in the automobile industry and the decrease in sales volume was a result of the slowing demand during the period. Subcontracting income revenues accounted for $83,020, or 1% of the sales mix for the nine months ended March 31, 2013, a decrease from $1,076,389 for the nine months ended March 31, 2012, due to reduced demand.

	Nine months ended March 31,
	2013		2012		Variance
Average Selling Prices	($)		($)		($)			(%)
Low-carbon hard-rolled		723		734		(11	)		(2	)
Low-carbon cold-rolled		741		810		(69	)		(9	)
High-carbon hot-rolled		723		1,102		(379	)		(34	)
High-carbon cold-rolled		859		1,035		(176	)		(17	)
Subcontracting income		63		534		(471	)		(88	)

The average selling price per ton decreased to $790 for the nine months ended March 31, 2013, compared to $847 last year, representing a decrease of $57, or 6.7%, period-on-period. This decrease was mainly due to decreases in general steel prices and therefore our selling prices during the nine months. Average selling prices decreased across all product categories during the nine months ended March 31, 2013.

Sales Breakdown by Major Customer

	2013						2012
Customers	$			% ofSales			$			% ofSales
Changshu Jiacheng Steel Plating Co., Ltd.		2,077,276			9			8,112,915			8
Unimax & Far Corporation		1,611,074			7			-	*		-	*
Shanghai Wozi Jintian Blade Co., Ltd.		1,620,098			7			-	*		-	*
Hangzhou Pugang Steel Materials Co., Ltd.		1,348,424			6			-	*		-	*
Shanghai Bayou Co., Ltd.		967,558			4			-	*		-	*
Shanghai Shengdejia Metal Products Co., Ltd.		-	*		-	*		14,107,630			13
Shanghai Changshuo Steel Co., Ltd.		-	*		-	*		12,068,785			11
Hangzhou Cogeneration Import & Export Co., Ltd.		-	*		-	*		11,204,723			11
Zhejiang Yongfeng Steel Co., Ltd.		-	*		-	*		7,957,124			8
		7,624,430			33			53,451,177			51
Others		15,060,094			67			51,872,866			49
Total		22,684,524			100			105,324,043			100

* Not major customers for the relevant periods

Sales revenue generated from our top five major customers as a percentage of total sales was 33% for the nine months ended March 31, 2013, as compared to 51% in 2012. The change in customer mix reflects management’s continuous efforts in expanding our customer base and geographical coverage during the course of the quarter.

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of sales decreased by $80,349,460, or 74.3%, period-on-period, to $27,828,738 for the nine months ended March 31, 2013, from $108,178,198 for the nine months ended March 31, 2012. Cost of sales represented 122.7% of sales revenues for the nine months ended March 31, 2013, compared to 102.7% for the nine months ended March 31, 2012. Average cost per unit sold increased to $969 for the nine months ended March 31, 2013, compared to $870 for the nine months ended March 31, 2012, representing an increase of $99 per ton, or 11.4%, period-on-period.

	2013		2012		Variance
	($)		($)		($)			(%)
Cost of goods sold
- Raw materials		20,446,881		98,982,682		(78,535,801	)		(79.3	)
- Direct labor		367,234		428,154		(60,920	)		(14.2	)
- Manufacturing overhead		7,014,623		8,767,362		(1,752,739	)		(20.0	)
		27,828,738		108,178,198		(80,349,460	)		(74.3	)
Cost per unit sold
Total units sold (tons)		28,722		124,353		(95,631	)		(76.9	)
Average cost per unit sold ($/ton)		969		870		99			11.4

The increase in average per unit cost of sales is represented by the combined effect of:

● an increase in factory overhead per unit sold of $173, or 243.7%, from $71 for the nine months ended March 31, 2012, to $244 for the nine months ended March 31, 2013;

● an increase in direct labor per unit sold of $10 or 333.3%, from $3 for the nine months ended March 31, 2012, to $13 for the nine months ended March 31, 2013, offset by;

● a decrease in cost of raw materials per unit sold of $84, or 10.6%, from $796 for the nine months ended March 31, 2012, to $712 for the nine months ended March 31, 2013.

The cost of raw materials consumed decreased by $78,535,801, or 79.3%, period-on-period, to $20,446,881 for the nine months ended March 31, 2013, from $98,982,682 for the nine months ended March 31, 2012. This decrease was mainly due to a substantial decrease in total units sold during the nine months ended March 31, 2013.

Direct labor costs decreased by $60,920, or 14.2%, period-on-period, to $367,234 for the nine months ended March 31, 2013, from $428,154 for the nine months ended March 31, 2012. Manufacturing overhead costs decreased by $1,752,739, or 20.0%, period-on-period, to $7,014,623 for the nine months ended March 31, 2013, from $8,767,362 for the nine months ended March 31, 2012. The decrease was mainly attributable to the combined effect of a decrease in utilities of $1,133,103, or 48.4%, period-on-period, to $1,205,683 for the nine months ended March 31, 2013, from $2,338,786 for the nine months ended March 31, 2012, and a decrease in consumables of $389,579, or 32.6%, period-on-period, to $804,217 for the nine months ended March 31, 2013, from $1,193,796 for the nine months ended March 31, 2012.

Gross Profit

Gross profit in absolute terms decreased by $2,290,059 or 80.2%, period-on-period, to a gross loss of $5,144,214 for the nine months ended March 31, 2013, from a gross loss of $2,854,155 for the nine months ended March 31, 2012. Gross profit margin decreased to (22.7%) for the nine months ended March 31, 2013, from (2.7%) for the nine months ended March 31, 2012. The decrease in gross profit margin is mainly attributable to a 11.4% period-on-period increase in average cost per unit sold.

Selling Expenses

Selling expenses decreased by $85,986, or 49.9%, period-on-period, to $86,237 for the nine months ended March 31, 2013, from $172,223 for the nine months ended March 31, 2012. The decrease was mainly attributable to lower transportation costs period-on-period.

Administrative Expenses

Administrative expenses decreased by $587,274 or 29.2%, period-on-period, to $1,420,503 for the nine months ended March 31, 2013, compared to $2,007,777 for the nine months ended March 31, 2012. This was mainly due to a decrease in traveling expenses and legal and professional fees period-on-period.

Allowance for Bad and Doubtful Debts

Allowance for bad and doubtful debts increased by $19,302,924, or 3,697.0%, period-on-period. Allowance recognized for the nine months ended March 31, 2013 was in the amount of $19,825,042 in accordance with our policy for allowance for doubtful accounts.

Loss from Operations

Loss from operations increased by $20,912,866, or 365.7%, period-on-period, to a loss of $26,631,749 for the nine months ended March 31, 2013, from $5,718,883 for the nine months ended March 31, 2012, as a result of the factors discussed above.

Other Income

Other income increased by $~~588~~2,~~995~~425, or ~~658~~2,354.14%, to $~~678~~2,~~500~~528 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, from $~~89,505~~103 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2012, due to higher interest income period-on-period.

Interest Expense

Total interest expense increased by $~~367~~78,~~461~~303, or 169.21%, to $2936,~~640,934~~891 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, from $2858,~~273,473~~588 for the three ~~nine~~ months ended ~~March~~ 31September 30, 2012, due to the ~~accrued~~accrual ~~late~~of ~~payment~~overdue and penalty interest as aresulting ~~result~~from ofour ~~the~~ loan default.

Income Tax

For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013 and 2012, we recognized no income tax expense, ~~compared~~due to ~~an income tax expense of $27,189 for the nine months ended March 31, 2012. The decrease of $27,189, or 100.0%, in income tax expense was~~ a ~~result of the~~ net loss ~~for the nine months ended March 31, 2013~~position.

Net Loss

Net loss increased by $205,~~664~~354,~~143~~857, or ~~260~~126.68%, period-on-period, to $289,~~594~~577,~~183~~140 for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, from $74,~~930~~222,~~040~~ 283 for the ~~nine~~ three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2012. The increase in net loss is attributable to a combination of all the factors discussed above, principally the negative gross margin and the ~~large~~ increase in allowance for bad and doubtful debts.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our business is capital intensive and requires substantial expenditures for, among other things, the purchase and maintenance of equipment used in our operations. Our short-term and long-term liquidity needs arise primarily from capital expenditures, working capital ~~requirements~~ requirements and principal and interest payments related to our outstanding indebtedness. We have met these liquidity requirements with cash provided by operations, equity financing, and bank debt. As of ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $0.21 million.

The following table provides detailed information about our net cash flows for all financial statement periods presented in this report:

CASH FLOWS

	Nine months Ended March 31
	Three Months Ended September 30,
	2013			2012
Net cash (used in)/provided by operating activities	$	(779,088	)	$	2,656,545
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	55,331		$	171,468
Net cash (used in) investing activities		(~~122~~14,~~803~~633	)		(~~309~~7,~~635~~424	)
Net cash (used in) financing activities		(~~542~~47,~~696~~650	)		~~(2,847,740~~-	)
Net cash flow		(18,~~440,532~~747	)		(~~463~~7,~~145~~238	)

Operating Activities

Net cash flows ~~used in~~provided by operating activities for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013 were $~~779~~55,~~088~~331, as compared to $2171,~~656,545~~ 468 provided by operating activities for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2012, resulting in a net decrease of $3116,~~435,633~~137. This decrease was mainly due to an increase in cash outflows for ~~inventories~~advances to suppliers of $13,174,279,~~939~~ ~~and~~offset aby ~~decrease~~an increase in cash inflow ~~inflows~~ from advances tofrom ~~suppliers~~customers of $12,~~952~~498,~~887~~ 417, during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013.

For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, sales revenues generated from the top five major customers as a percentage of total sales was 3349%, as compared to 5146% in the prior period. The loss of all or portion of the sales volume from a significant customer would have an adverse effect on our operating cash flows. We note that the continuation or intensification of the ~~worldwide~~credit ~~economic~~tightening in ~~crisis~~China ~~may~~and the slowdown of the Chinese economy have had and will continue to have negative consequences on the business operations of our customers and adversely impact their ability to meet their financial obligations to us, resulting in ~~unrecoverable~~further unrecoverable losses on our accounts receivable. We ~~have been strengthening our collection activities and~~ will ~~continue~~regularly ~~to closely monitor any changes in collection experience and the credit ratings of our customers. From time to time we will~~ review credit periods offered, along with our collection experience and the other relevant factors, to evaluate the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts, and to make changes to the allowance, if necessary. Delays or non-payment of accounts receivable would have an adverse effect on our operating cash flows.

Investing Activities

Net cash flows used in investing activities for the three months ended September 30, 2013 were $14,633, as compared with $7,424 for the three months ended September 30, 2012. Our main uses of cash for investing activities during the ~~three~~period ~~months~~ ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013 were for the purchase of ~~additional~~ property, plant and equipment to complement our existing production facilities.

~~Net cash flows used~~We inforecast ~~investing~~low ~~activities~~capital ~~for~~expenditures in the ~~nine~~coming ~~months~~years ~~ended March 31, 2013 were $122,803,~~ as ~~compared with $309,635 for~~ the ~~nine~~Company ~~months ended~~does ~~March~~not ~~31,~~have ~~2012.~~any ~~Cash~~expansion ~~flows~~plans ~~used in investing activities decreased period-on-period~~ as ~~majority~~at ofSeptember ~~the~~30, ~~construction of the additional annealing furnaces have been completed~~2013.

We forecast lower capital expenditures in the coming years as the Company has already completed most of its major expansion plans.

Financing Activities

Net cash flows used in financing activities for the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013 were $~~542~~47,~~696~~650, as compared to $~~2,874,740~~nil for the three ~~nine~~ months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2012, ~~for~~as athe ~~net decrease of $2,332,044. The~~ Company made a partial repayment ~~for~~of ~~its~~ short-term ~~loan~~loans ~~from the deposit account held with Raiffeisen Zentral bank Österreich AG (“RZB”)~~ during the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March 31,~~ ~~2013~~September ~~and did not make any repayment for its long-term loan as it did during the nine months ended March 31~~30, ~~2012~~2013.

Our working capital requirements and the cash flow provided by future operating activities will vary from quarter to quarter, and are dependent on factors such as volume of business and payment terms with our customers. As such, we may need to rely on access to the financial markets to provide us with significant discretionary funding capacity. However, the current uncertainty arising out of domestic and global economic conditions, including the continuing disruption in credit markets, poses a risk to the economies in which we operate and may adversely impact our potential sources of capital financing. The general unavailability of credit could make capital financing more expensive for us or impossible altogether. Even if we are able to obtain credit, the incurrence of indebtedness could result in increased debt service obligations. In June and July 2012, we defaulted on the repayment obligations of our short-term and long-term bank loans totaling $4344,~~873~~311,~~871~~165. We are currently in discussions with our banks regarding the possibility ~~restructuring~~to ofrestructure these loans for repayment but have not yet agreed on specific terms. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully work out a repayment plan or otherwise fulfill its obligations under the loans. Further, each of these lenders has the right to take possession of the collateral (which collectively constitute substantial assets of the Company) granted in connection with their respective loan agreements. The unavailability of debt financing as a result of economic pressures on the credit and equity markets could have a material adverse effect on our business operations.

Going Concern

Historically, we have funded our operations and expansion expenditures from cash generated by operating activities, bank borrowings and issuance of common stock. AsWe ~~discussed above,~~believe ~~the~~that ~~Company~~we ~~defaulted~~have on the ~~repayment~~financial ~~obligations~~resources ofneeded ~~its~~to ~~bank~~meet ~~loans~~business ~~and~~requirements for the ~~restructuring~~next oftwelve ~~these loans has not yet been~~months ~~agreed~~if ~~on.~~we Weare ~~also~~able ~~expect the tightened credit and slowing growth in China~~ to ~~continue~~work toout ~~cause~~ a ~~slow~~repayment ~~turnover~~plan ofacceptable ~~our~~to ~~accounts receivable~~us ~~and~~with ~~have a negative impact on~~ our ~~operating~~banks ~~cash~~for ~~flows in~~ the ~~next~~defaulted ~~nine months~~loans. The uncertainty surrounding the successful restructuring of our bank loans and our current lack of readily available liquidity provided by other third party sources raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Current Assets

Current assets decreased by $162,~~982~~415,~~321~~974, or 14 4.73%, period-on-period, to $9853,~~597~~885,~~518~~289 as of ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, from $~~115~~56,~~579~~301,~~839~~263 as of June 30, ~~2012~~2013, principally as a result of a an decrease in accounts receivable of $205,~~643~~216,~~850~~711, or 3417.97%, period-on-period, offset by an increase in advances to suppliers of $2,255,470, or 24.2%, and an increase in inventories of $5722,~~043~~940,~~346,~~ or 324.56%, period-on-period.

Accounts receivable, representing 39.0% of total current assets as of March 31, 2013, is a significant asset of the Company. We offer credit to our customers in the normal course of our business and accounts receivable is stated net of allowance for doubtful accounts. Credit periods vary substantially across industries, segments, types and size of companies in China where we principally operate our business. Because of the niche products that we process, our customers are usually also niche players in their own respective segment, who then sell their products to the end product manufacturers. The business cycle is relatively long, as well as the credit periods. The Company offers credit to its customers for periods of 60 days, 90 days, 120 days and 180 days. We generally offer longer credit terms to long-standing recurring customers with good payment histories and sizable operations.11

~~Our management determines~~Accounts the collectability of outstanding accounts by maintaining at least quarterly communication with such customers and obtaining confirmation of their intent to fulfill their obligations to the Company. In making this determinationreceivable, ~~our~~representing ~~management also considers past collection experience, our relationship with customers and the impact of current economic conditions on our industry and market~~45. We0% ~~note that the continuation or intensification~~ of ~~the~~total current ~~global~~assets ~~economic~~as ~~crisis may have negative consequences on the business operations~~ of ~~our~~September ~~customers and adversely impact their ability to meet their financial obligations. To reserve for potentially uncollectible accounts receivable~~30, ~~for the nine months ended March 31,~~ 2013, ~~our~~is ~~management has made~~ a ~~50%~~significant ~~provision~~asset ~~for~~of ~~all~~the ~~accounts receivable that are over 180 days past due and full provision for all accounts receivable over one year past due~~Company. ~~From~~We ~~time to~~offer ~~time, we will review these~~ credit ~~periods,~~to ~~along with~~ our ~~collection~~customers ~~experience~~in ~~and~~ the ~~other~~normal ~~factors~~course ~~discussed above, to evaluate the adequacy~~ of our ~~allowance~~business ~~for~~and ~~doubtful~~ accounts, ~~and~~receivable tois ~~make~~stated ~~changes~~net toof ~~the~~ allowance, iffor ~~necessary.~~doubtful If our actual collection experience or other conditions change, revisions to our allowances may be required, including a further provision which could adversely affect our operating income, or write back of provision when estimated uncollectible accounts ~~are actually collected~~.

WeAs we expect the ~~tightened credit~~continuation ~~and~~or ~~slowing~~intensification ~~growth~~of the credit tightening in China and the slowdown of the Chinese economy to continue to ~~cause~~have anegative ~~slow~~consequences ~~turnover~~on the business operations of our ~~accounts~~customers ~~receivable~~and inadversely ~~the~~impact ~~next~~their ~~twelve~~ability ~~months~~to meet their financial obligations to us, we have largely limited further credit sales and will only offer credit terms to customers with good payment histories.

~~The~~To reserve ~~following~~for ~~table~~potentially uncollectible accounts receivable, we have made a 50% provision for all accounts receivable that are over ~~reflects~~180 ~~the~~days ~~aging~~past ofdue ~~our~~and full provision for all accounts receivable ~~based~~over onone year past due. ~~date~~We aswill ofalso ~~March~~regularly 31review these credit periods, ~~2013~~along with our collection experience and ~~June~~the 30other factors discussed above, ~~2012:~~to evaluate the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts, and to make changes to the allowance, if necessary. If our actual collection experience or other conditions change, revisions to our allowances may be required, including a further provision which could adversely affect our operating income, or write back of provision when estimated uncollectible accounts are actually collected. Any such additional bad debt charges could materially and adversely affect our future operating results.

~~March~~The 31following table reflects the aging of our accounts receivable based on due date as of September 30, 2013 and June 30, 2013:

US$	Total		Current		1 to 30 days		31 to 90 days		91 to 180 days		181 to 360days		over 1 year
TOTAL		61,793,564		994,214		898,261		6,787,833		7,750,226		44,082,793		1,280,237
%		100		2		1		11		13	71			2

September 30, 2013

June 30, 2012

US$

Total

Current

1 to 30 days

31 to

90 days

91 to 180 days

181 to 360

days

over

1 year

TOTAL

60,066,852

232,597

4,635,519

1,501,116

4,918,489

25,950,273

22,828,858

100

US$	Total		Current		1 to 30 days		31 to 90 days		91 to 180 days		181 to 360 days		over 1 year
TOTAL		62,348,544		24,573,802		4,167,802		9,451,142		18,940,851		3,964,416		1,250,531
%		100		40		7		15		30	6			2

June 30, 2013

US$

Total

Current

1 to 30 days

31 to

90 days

91 to 180 days

181 to 360

days

over

1 year

TOTAL

60,123,111

6,328,112

1,605,948

955,364

8,932,972

23,314,353

18,986,362

100

Management continues to take actions to perform business and credit reviews of our existing and new customers to protect the Company from any who might pose a high credit risk to our business based on their commercial credit reports, our past collection history with them, and our perception of the risk posed by their geographic location. Currently we are also not extending credit on sales in any substantial amount to limit further exposures in accounts receivable.

Current Liabilities

Current ~~liabilities~~ liabilities increased by $34,~~940~~955,~~274~~958, or 57.94%, period-on-period, to $7071,~~616~~973,~~150~~901 as of ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, from $6667,~~675~~017,~~876~~943 as of June 30, ~~2012~~2013. The increase was mainly attributable to an increase in accounts payable and accrued ~~expenses~~liabilities of $2,042,926, or 29.0%, period-on-period, and an increase in advances from customers of $3,~~216~~022,~~964~~451, or 47207.5%, period-on-period.

As of ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, we had $2728,~~673~~111,~~871~~165 in short-term loans and $16,200,000 in long-term loan current portion. Principal and interest under ~~the~~these loans were to be repaid in full onin July ~~31,~~and June 2012, but the Company has defaulted on ~~this~~these repayment ~~obligation~~obligations. The Company is currently in discussion with its ~~bank~~banks regarding the ~~restructuring of~~possibility to restructure these loans but there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully work out a repayment plan or otherwise fulfill its obligations under the loan.

Capital Expenditures

During the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, we invested $~~122~~14,~~803~~633 in purchases of additional property, plant and equipment.

Loan Facilities

The following table illustrates our credit facilities as of ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, providing the name of the lender, the amount of the facility, the date of issuance and the maturity date:

All amounts in U.S. dollars

Lender

Date of Loan

~~Maturity Date~~

Maturity Date

~~Duration~~

Duration

~~Interest Rate~~

Interest Rate

Principal Amount

Raiffeisen

June 29, 2011

July 31, 2012

1 year

1.15 times

8,068,157

Raiffeisen ZentralbankÖsterreich AG (“RZB”)

June 29, 2011

July 31, 2012

1 year

1.15 times of the PBOC rate

$ RMB

8,195,647 (50,154,084

)

Zentralbank Österreich AG (“RZB”)

the PBOC rate

RMB

(50,154,084)

Raiffeisen ZentralbankÖsterreich AG

June 29, 2010

July 31, 2012

1 year

1.15 times of the PBOC rate

$ RMB

19,915,517 (121,875,000

)

Raiffeisen

June 29, 2011

July 31, 2012

1 year

1.15 times the

$19,605,714

28,111,165

Zentralbank Österreich AG

PBOC rate

RMB

(121,875,000)

DEG – Deutsche Investitions – und EntwicklungsgesellschaftmbH

June 29, 2010

June 15, 2016

6 years

6 month USD LIBOR + 4.5%

$ RMB

16,200,000 (99,137,520

)

DEG – Deutsche Investitions – und

June 29, 2010

June 15, 2016

6 years

6 month USD

16,200,000

Entwicklungsgesellschaft mbH

LIBOR + 4.5%

RMB

(100,704,060)

Total

44,311,165

Total

43,873,871

On January 29, 2010, Shanghai Blessford entered into a Senior Loan Agreement with DEG -Deutsche Investitions-Und ~~Entwicklungsgesellschaft Mbh~~EntwicklungsgesellschaftMbh, or “DEG,” for a loan amount up to $18,000,000 at an annual interest rate of 4.5% above the six-month USD LIBOR rate. The loan is secured by a mortgage on the new cold rolling line and annealing furnaces at Shanghai Blessford’s facilities and guaranteed by the Company. The loan was to have been repaid semi-annually over five years starting on December 15, 2011, but the Company has defaulted on this repayment obligation, ~~since~~as well as on repayment of the June 15, ~~2012~~2011 installment. The Company is currently in discussions with DEG regarding the ~~restructuring of~~possibility to restructure the ~~loans~~loan for repayment but has not yet agreed on specific terms. Until such agreement is reached, DEG has the right to cancel the total outstanding commitment of the loan, demand immediate repayment of the loan or any part thereof together with accrued interest, and/or terminate the loan agreement. DEG may also take possession of the collateral granted in connection with their respective loan agreements, which would have a material adverse impact on the Company. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully work out a repayment plan with DEG or otherwise fulfill its obligations under the loan.

16On June 29, 2011, the Company entered into two short-term loan agreements with RaiffeisenZentralbankOsterreich AG, or “RZB,” pursuant to which the Company borrowed an aggregate of $28,111,165 at an annual interest rate of 1.15 times the standard market rate set by the People’s Bank of China. The loans are secured by inventories, land use rights, buildings and plant and machinery, and is guaranteed by PSHL and our former Chairman, Mr. Wo Hing Li. Mr. Li also undertook to maintain a shareholding percentage in the Company of not less than 33.4% unless otherwise agreed to with RZB. Principal and interest under the loans were to be repaid in full on July 31, 2012, but the Company has defaulted on this repayment obligation. The Company is currently in discussions with RZB regarding the possibility to restructure the loans for repayment but has not yet agreed on specific terms. Any restructuring will be subject to approval by RZB’s governing bodies, and to the Company’s ability to meet certain conditions and requirements that may be imposed by the Bank. Until such agreement is reached, RZB has the right to take possession of the collateral granted in connection with the loan agreement, which action would have a material adverse impact on the Company. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully work out a repayment plan with RZB or otherwise fulfill its obligations under the loan.

On June 29, 2011, the Company entered into two short-term loan agreements with Raiffeisen Zentralbank Osterreich AG, or “RZB”, pursuant to which the Company borrowed an aggregate of $27,610,356 at an annual interest rate of 1.15 times the standard market rate set by the People’s Bank of China. The loans are secured by inventories, land use rights, buildings and plant and machinery, and is guaranteed by PSHL and our former Chairman, Mr. Wo Hing Li. Mr. Li also undertook to maintain a shareholding percentage in the Company of not less than 33.4% unless otherwise agreed to with RZB. Principal and interest under the loans were to be repaid in full on July 31, 2012, but the Company has defaulted on this repayment obligation. The Company is currently in discussions with RZB regarding the restructuring of the loans for repayment but has not yet agreed on specific terms. Any restructuring will be subject to approval by RZB’s governing bodies, and to the Company’s ability to meet certain conditions and requirements that may be imposed by the Bank. Until such agreement is reached, RZB has the right to take possession of the collateral granted in connection with the loan agreement, which action would have a material adverse impact on the Company. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to successfully work out a repayment plan with RZB or otherwise fulfill its obligations under the loan.13

Obligations under Material Contracts

Below is a table setting forth our material contractual obligations as of ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, debt obligations include principal repayments and interest payments:

	Payments Due By Year
Contractual obligations:	Total		Fiscal ~~Year2013~~Year 2014		~~FiscalYear2014-~~Fiscal Year 2015-2016		~~FiscalYear2016-~~Fiscal Year 2017-2018		~~FiscalYears2018~~Fiscal ~~andBeyond~~Years 2019 and Beyond
Short-term debt obligations	$	29,583,368	$	29,583,368	$	-	$	-	$	-
Short-Term Debt Obligations	$	30,050,835	$	30,050,835	$	-	$	-	$	-
Current portion of long-term debt obligations	$	17,003,520	$	17,003,520	$	-	$	-	$	-
Current Portion of Long-Term Debt Obligations	$	16,992,666	$	16,992,666	$	-	$	-	$	-
	$	4647,~~586~~043,~~888~~501	$	4647,~~586~~043,~~888~~501	$	-	$	-	$	-

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In July ~~December 2011~~2013, the FASB issued ASU No. ~~2011~~2013-11, ~~Disclosures~~Presentation ~~About~~of ~~Offsetting~~an ~~Assets~~Unrecognized ~~and~~Tax ~~Liabilities,~~Benefit ~~(“ASU~~When ~~2011-11”).~~a ~~The amendments~~Net inOperating ~~ASU~~Loss ~~2011-11~~Carryforward, a ~~require~~Similar ~~entities~~Tax toLoss, ~~disclose~~or ~~information~~a ~~about~~Tax ~~offsetting~~Credit ~~and~~Carryforward ~~related~~Exists ~~arrangements~~(“ASU to2013-11”). ~~enable~~The ~~users~~objective of ~~financial~~ ~~statements~~ASU to2013-11 ~~understand~~is to eliminate the ~~effect~~diversities ofthat ~~those~~exist ~~arrangements~~in ~~on an entity’s~~ financial ~~position~~statement presentation. The amendments ~~require enhanced~~aim ~~disclosures~~at byattaining ~~requiring~~this ~~improved~~objective ~~information~~by ~~about~~giving ~~financial~~explicit guidance ~~instruments~~on ~~and~~the ~~derivative~~financial ~~instruments~~statement ~~that~~presentation ~~are~~of ~~either (i)~~an ~~offset~~unrecognized intax ~~accordance~~benefit ~~with~~when ~~current~~a ~~literature~~net oroperating ~~(ii)~~loss ~~subject~~carryforward, toa ansimilar tax ~~enforceable~~loss, ~~master netting arrangement~~ or ~~similar~~a ~~agreement, irrespective~~tax ofcredit ~~whether~~carryforward ~~they~~exists. ~~are~~The ~~offset~~amendments in ~~accordance~~this ~~with~~Update ~~current~~are ~~literature. ASU 2011-11 is~~ effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning ~~on or~~ after ~~January~~December 115, 2013. ~~This~~The ~~standard~~amendments ~~will~~of ~~become~~ASU ~~effective~~2013-11, ~~for~~when ~~the Company beginning July 1~~adopted, ~~2013.~~are ~~The Company does~~ not ~~believe~~expected ~~adoption~~to ~~of this new guidance will~~ have a material ~~significant~~ impact on ~~its~~the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In July 2012, the FASB issued ASU No. 2012-02, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment (“ASU 2012-02”). ASU 2012-02 amends Topic 350 by establishing an optional two-step analysis for impairment testing of indefinite-lived intangibles other than goodwill. This update allows an entity the option to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test. Under that option, an entity no longer would be required to calculate the fair value of the intangible asset unless the entity determines, based on that qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. ASU 2012-02 is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012 and early adoption is permitted. This standard will become effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2013. The Company does not believe adoption of this new guidance will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

Seasonality

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

For the ~~nine~~three months ended ~~March~~September 3130, 2013, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) that are designed to ensure that information that would be required to be disclosed in Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including to our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Hai Sheng Chen, and Chief Financial Officer, Ms. Leada Tak Tai Li, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of ~~March~~September 3130, 2013. Based upon, and as of the date of this evaluation, Mr. Chen and Ms. Li, determined that because of the material weaknesses described below, as of ~~March~~September 3130, 2013 our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

During its review of our consolidated financial statements for the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2013, our management concluded that our accounting staff lacked sufficient accounting skills and experience necessary to fulfill our public reporting obligations according to U.S. GAAP and the SEC’s rules and regulations.14

~~Management~~During its isreview ~~currently~~of ~~seeking~~our ~~for~~consolidated ~~and~~financial ~~plans to~~statements ~~appoint~~for ~~qualified~~the ~~personnel~~fiscal asquarter ~~soon~~ended asSeptember ~~practicable~~30, to2013, ~~remediate~~our ~~this material weakness. Our~~ management ~~does not believe that~~concluded ~~this~~that ~~material~~our ~~weakness~~accounting ~~had~~staff alacked ~~material~~sufficient ~~effect~~accounting onskills ~~our~~and ~~financial~~experience ~~condition~~necessary orto ~~results~~fulfill ofour ~~operations~~public orreporting ~~caused~~obligations according ~~our~~to ~~financial~~U.S. ~~statements as~~GAAP of and ~~for~~ the ~~fiscal~~SEC’s ~~quarter~~rules ~~ended~~and ~~March 31, 2013, such as to contain a material misstatement~~regulations.

Management is currently seeking for and plans to appoint qualified personnel as soon as practicable to remediate this material weakness. Our management does not believe that this material weakness had a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations or caused our financial statements as of and for the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2013, such as to contain a material misstatement.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

We regularly review our system of internal control over financial reporting and make changes to our processes and systems to improve controls and increase efficiency, while ensuring that we maintain an effective internal control environment. Changes may include such activities as implementing new, more efficient systems, consolidating activities, and migrating processes.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise, in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these, or other matters, may arise from time to time that may harm our business.

On March 15, 2012, the Company received notice of a complaint filed by a Mr. Haining Zhang and China Venture Partners, Inc. in the U.S. Southern District Court of New York on March 9, 2012, against several defendants, including the Company, as successor to OraLabs Holding Corp. In the complaint Mr. Zhang is ~~alleging~~alleges, among other things, breach of contract by the Company and certain of our former officers, directors and control persons, in connection with our December 2006 acquisition of Partner Success Holdings Limited. ~~Among other things,~~ Mr. Zhang ~~alleges~~asserts ~~that the~~a ~~defendants~~breach ~~breached~~of an agreement to compensate him for services he allegedly performed in connection with seeking out a merger candidate for the Company. The Company ~~believes~~filed ~~that the suit is without merit and intends to vigorously defend its interests in the case. The Company was granted court permission to file~~ a motion to dismiss, ~~the action~~ as ~~against~~did ~~it. Prior to filing~~ the ~~motion~~ toother ~~dismiss~~defendants, ~~plaintiffs~~and ~~amended~~that ~~their complaint. Accordingly, the Company filed a~~ motion towas granted ~~dismiss~~on ~~the~~or ~~amended~~about ~~complaint. On~~ March 13, 2013~~, the Company’s motions to dismiss were granted by the Court~~. The Plaintiff had the right to appeal within 30 days of the court decision, and ahas ~~notice~~done ~~of appeal was filed on April 17, 2013~~so. The Plaintiff has ~~the~~filed ~~obligation~~an toappellate ~~prepare the~~brief ~~record on appeal~~ and ~~have~~ the ~~same~~Company ~~submitted~~has tofiled ~~the~~a ~~Court~~brief ofin ~~Appeals~~opposition. We ~~intend~~expect ~~to file~~ a ~~notice~~decision towithin ~~oppose~~the ~~such~~next eight ~~appeal~~(8) months. An Although an estimate of any potential loss cannot be made at this time, the Company does not believe that its business or financial condition is materially adversely affected.

Except with respect to the foregoing proceeding, we are currently not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that we believe will have a material adverse affect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS.

Not Applicable.

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

None.

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

None.

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION.

We have no information to disclose that was required to be in a report on Form 8-K during the period covered by this report, but was not reported. There have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to our board of directors.

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS.

The following exhibits are filed as part of this report or incorporated by reference:

Exhibit No.		Description
31.1*		Certifications of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2*		Certifications of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
101.INS**		XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE**		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.INS*		XBRL Instance Document
*		Filed herewith.
101.SCH*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
**		In accordance with Regulation S-T, the XBRL-formatted interactive data files that comprise Exhibit 101 in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall be deemed “furnished” and not “filed”.
101.CAL*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE*		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

* Filed Herewith.16

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: May 15, 2013	CHINA PRECISION STEEL, INC.
Date: November 19, 2013	CHINA PRECISION STEEL, INC.
	By:	/s/ Hai Sheng Chen
		Hai Sheng Chen, Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)
	By:	/s/ Leada Tak Tai Li
		Leada Tak Tai Li, Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial Officer and Principal
		Accounting Officer)

~~By: /s/ Leada Tak Tai Li Leada Tak Tai Li, Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)~~17

Filing Compare · China Precision Steel, Inc.