UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period Ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2015

Commission File Number ~~333~~ 000-~~157010~~55471

STATIONDIGITAL CORPORATION

(formerly known as Alarming Devices, Inc.)

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		26-3062327
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

~~Highlands~~5402 ~~Plaza~~West ~~Two~~Laurel Street, ~~5700~~Suite ~~Oakland Ave, #200~~203

St. Louis, Missouri, 63110

(Address of principal executive office and zip code)

(855) 782-8466

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the issuer (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

¨ Large accelerated filer ☐¨ Accelerated filer ☐¨ Non-accelerated filer ☐x Smaller reporting company ~~☒ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)~~

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of ~~June~~September 327, 2015, 8586,~~060~~425,~~827~~685 shares of the Registrant's common stock, par value $0.001 per share, were issued and outstanding.

STATIONDIGITAL CORPORATION

FORM 10-Q

For the period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements	3
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	23
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	2627
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	2628
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION		28
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	2829
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	2829
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	2829
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	30
Item 4.	Mine Safety ~~Disclosures~~Disclosure	3031
Item 5.	Other Information	3031
Item 6.	Exhibits	3132
SIGNATURES		3233

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

StationDigital Corporation

Index to Financial Statements (Unaudited)

	~~Page~~	Page
Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (Unaudited)	4
Condensed Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 (Unaudited)			4
Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 (Unaudited)	5
Condensed Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (Unaudited)			5
Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 and 2014 (Unaudited)	6
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 (Unaudited)			6
Notes to the Financial Statements	7
Notes to the Condensed Financial Statements (Unaudited)			7

StationDigital Corporation Condensed Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

Balance Sheets

	June 30, 2015			December 31, 2014

Assets
Current assets
Cash	$	23,601		$	8,325
Prepaid expenses		744			26,293
Financing cost		54,055			122,868
Deposit		-			47,840
Total current assets		78,400			205,326

Property and equipment, net		-			48,690
Website development costs, net		-			317,119
Trademarks		-			28,105
Total assets	$	78,400		$	599,240

Liabilities and stockholders' deficit
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	4,964,700		$	4,409,464
Advances from stockholder		85,837			85,837
Accrued expenses		142,501			348,235
Accrued stock payable		414,206			-
Accured interest		275,125			83,637
Derivitive liability -warrants		765,516			1,336,794
Derivitive liability -related party warrants		192,955			396,087
Derivitive liability -convertible notes		1,287,202			1,462,039
Derivitive liability - related party convertible notes		473,285			313,365
Convertible Notes payable, net of unamortized debt discount of $555,498 and		1,722,002			354,419
$1,333,081, respectively
Convertible Notes related party payable, net of unamortized debt discount of $186,735 and		752,862			187,500
$312,500, respectively
Notes payable		523,564			-
Related party notes payable		-			168,627
Total current liabilities		11,599,755			9,146,004

Total liabilities		11,599,755			9,146,004

Commitments and contingencies		-			-

Stockholders' deficit
Preferred stock par value $0.001: 10,000,000 shares authorized;
0 and 988 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively		-			-
Common stock par value $0.001: 500,000,000 shares authorized;
85,560,827 and 83,527,827 shares issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively		85,561			83,528
Stock payable		-			202,359
Additional paid-in capital		8,852,767			8,193,940
Accumulated deficit		(20,459,683	)		(17,026,591	)
Total stockholders' deficit		(11,521,355	)		(8,546,764	)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit	$	78,400		$	599,240

	March 31, 2015			December 31, 2014
Assets
Current assets
Cash	$	39,538		$	8,325
Prepaid expenses		30,184			26,293
Financing cost		128,216			122,868
Deposit		47,840			47,840
Total current assets		245,778			205,326
Property and equipment, net		44,190			48,690
Website development costs, net		656,694			317,119
Trademarks		32,209			28,105
Total assets	$	978,871		$	599,240
Liabilities and stockholders' deficit
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	4,554,744		$	4,409,464
Advances from stockholder		85,837			85,837
Accrued expenses		420,678			348,235
Accured interest		161,626			83,637
Derivitive liability - warrants		1,883,943			1,732,881
Derivitive liability - convertible notes		2,007,326			1,775,404
Notes payable - related party, net of unamortized debt discount of $148,780 and $312,500, respectively		351,220			187,500
Notes payable, net of unamortized debt discount of $1,255,159 and $1,333,081, respectively		1,482,341			354,419
Related party payable		239,758			168,627
Total current liabilities		11,187,473			9,146,004
Total Liabilities		11,187,473			9,146,004
Stockholders' deficit
Preferred stock par value $0.001: 10,000,000 shares authorized; 0 and 0 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		-			-
Common stock par value $0.001: 500,000,000 shares authorized; 84,077,827 and 83,527,827 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		84,078			83,528
Stock payable		504,234			202,359
Additional paid-in capital		8,388,390			8,193,940
Accumulated deficit		(19,185,304	)		(17,026,591	)
Total stockholders' deficit		(10,208,602	)		(8,546,764	)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit	$	978,871		$	599,240

See accompanying notes to these condensed financial statements.

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

StationDigital Corporation Condensed Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

Statements of Operations

	For the Three			For the Three			For the Six			For the Six
	Months			Months			Months			Months
	Ended			Ended			Ended			Ended
	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014			June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014

Revenue	$	-		$	39,054.00		$	704.00		$	55,561.00

Cost of revenue		43,548			248,207			89,987			461,138

Gross loss		(43,548	)		(209,153	)		(89,283	)		(405,577	)

Operating expenses
Product development costs		144,358			406,408			380,087			495,957
Sales and marketing		8,543			2,382,129			127,700			3,327,561
General and administrative		779,618			828,101			1,812,023			959,545
Total operating expenses		932,519			3,616,638			2,319,810			4,783,063

Loss from operations		(976,067	)		(3,825,791	)		(2,409,093	)		(5,188,640	)

Other income (expense)
Gain on change in derivative		1,481,611			-			1,648,626			-
Loss on asset impairment		(634,179	)		-			(634,179	)		-
Loss on asset disposals		(39,691	)		-			(39,691	)		-
Interest expense		(1,120,258	)		-			(1,999,460	)		-
Other income (expense)		705			(15,658	)		705			(15,658	)
Total other income (expense)		(311,812	)		(15,658	)		(1,023,999	)		(15,658	)

Net loss	$	(1,287,879.00	)	$	(3,841,449.00	)	$	(3,433,092.00	)	$	(5,204,298.00	)

Net loss per common share:
-Basic and diluted	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.07	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.10	)

Weighted average common shares outstanding
-Basic and diluted		83,782,827			59,172,103			84,326,016			52,067,327

	For the Three			For the Three
	Months			Months
	Ended			Ended
	March 31, 2015			March 31, 2014
Revenue	$	704		$	16,507
Cost of revenue		46,439			212,932
Gross loss		(45,735	)		(196,425	)
Operating expenses
Product development costs		202,036			89,248
Sales and marketing		238,566			938,432
General and administrative		960,189			196,923
Total operating expenses		1,400,791			1,224,603
Loss from operations		(1,446,526	)		(1,421,028	)
Other income (expense)
Gain/(Loss) on change in derivitive		167,015			-
Interest expense		(879,202	)		-
Total other income (expense)		(712,187	)		-
Net loss	$	(2,158,713	)	$	(1,421,028	)
Net loss per common share:
- Basic	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.03	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding
- Basic		83,782,827			44,883,600

See accompanying notes to these condensed financial statements.

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

StationDigital Corporation Condensed Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

Statements of Cash Flows

	For the Six			For the Six
	Months			Months
	Ended			Ended
	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(3,433,092	)	$	(5,204,298	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation		9,000			49,334
Amortization of interest expense		1,883,561			12,000
Amortization of financing cost		136,263			-
Discount on related party note		(66,190	)		-
Website development - Impairment		601,971			-
Common stock issued for services		660,860			477,507
Trademarks - Impairment		32,209			-
Loss on disposal of assets		39,691			-
Change in derivatives		(1,648,626	)		-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Decrease in prepaid expenses		25,549			-
Decrease in deposits and other		47,840			1,000
Increase in accounts receivable		-			(9,200	)
Increase in accounts payable		555,236			3,508,780
Decrease in accrued expenses		(205,734	)		96,307
Increase in accrued interest		191,488			-
Increase in Stock Payable		211,847			47,197

Net cash used in operating activities		(958,127	)		(1,021,373	)

Cash flows from investing activities
Payments website development costs		(339,576	)		-
Payments for Trademark costs		(4,104	)		-

Net cash used in investing activities		(343,680	)		-

Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from note payable		573,564			500,000
Payments on note payable		(50,000	)		-
Proceeds from related party note payable		270,969			-
Payments for financing fees		(67,450	)		-
Proceeds from GoldenHeart Holdings		-			936,746
Payments to GoldenHeart Holdings		-			(1,117,821	)
Proceeds from GHH Commerce		-			24,022
Payments to GHH Commerce		-			(72,315	)
Proceeds from Sale of Common Stock		-			995,000
Proceeds from convertible notes		590,000			-

Net cash provided by financing activities		1,317,083			1,265,632

Net change in cash		15,276			244,259

Cash, beginning of reporting period		8,325			5,687

Cash, end of reporting period	$	23,601		$	249,946

Supplemental disclosure of cash flows information:
Interest paid	$	-		$	-
Income tax paid	$	-		$	-

Noncash investing and financing activities:
Related Party Payable replaced with Related Party Convertible Note Payable	$	168,627		$	-
Related Party Payable converted to Common Stock	$	-		$	(2,843,241	)
Shares Issues as Prepaid Services	$	-		$	(645,674	)
Net Liabilities assumed in a reverse merger	$	-		$	118,263
Development cost payable applied to related party receivable	$	-		$	(206,211	)

	For the Three			For the Three
	Months			Months
	Ended			Ended
	March 31, 2015			March 31, 2014
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(2,158,713	)	$	(1,421,028	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		4,500			24,669
Amortization of interest expense		791,641			30,178
Amortization of financing cost		62,102			-
Common stock issued for services		312,600			-
Accrued advisory service fee		184,275			1,666
Conversion of notes payable to equity		-			666,500
Gain on change in derivitive		(167,015	)		-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Increase in prepaid expenses		(3,891	)		-
Decrease in deposits		-			1,000
Increase in accounts receivable		-			(6,851	)
Increase in accounts payable		145,280			1,148,104
Increase in wages payable		-			22,650
Increase in accrued expenses		72,443			-
Increase in accrued interest		77,989			-
Net cash used in operating activities		(678,789	)		466,888
Cash flows from investing activities
Related party receivable		-			(10,761	)
Website development		(339,575	)		-
Loans to shareholders		-			4,045
Trademarks		(4,104	)		-
Net cash used in investing activities		(343,679	)		(6,716	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from promissory notes		500,000			-
Proceeds from related party payable		71,131			-
Proceeds from GoldenHeart Holdings		-			213,266
Payments to GoldenHeart Holdings		-			(947,065	)
Payments to GHH Commerce		-			(10,315	)
Proceeds from convertible notes		482,550			290,000
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,053,681			(454,114	)
Net change in cash		31,213			6,058
Cash, beginning of reporting period		8,325			5,687
Cash, end of reporting period	$	39,538		$	11,745
Supplemental disclosure of cash flows information:
Interest paid	$	-		$	-
Income tax paid	$	-		$	-
Noncash investing and financing activities:
Capitalized financing cost	$	67,450		$	-

See accompanying notes to these condensed financial statements.

See accompanying notes to the financial statements.

STATIONDIGITAL CORPORATION

(ANOTES ~~DEVELOPMENT~~TO ~~STAGE~~CONDENSED ~~COMPANY)~~FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Note 1 – Nature of Business and Significant Accounting Policies

StationDigital Corporation ("”StationDigital~~") was~~”, ~~originally~~or ~~organized~~“the asCompany”), is a ~~Missouri~~multimedia ~~limited~~streaming ~~liability~~digital broadcast company onthat ~~November~~offers ~~14,~~free ~~2012~~music streaming for millions of songs. StationDigital features both genre-based and ~~was~~artist-based ~~subsequently~~music ~~converted~~discovery stations to suit an endless variety of musical tastes and a ~~Delaware C~~personal recommendation service -~~Corporation~~ onall ~~November~~available ~~18,~~both ~~2013~~online via the Internet and through its iOS and Android mobile applications (“apps”).

OnThe ~~April~~StationDigital ~~23,~~Listener ~~2014,~~Rewards ~~StationDigital~~Program ~~consummated a~~is ~~Stock~~designed ~~Purchase~~to ~~Agreement,~~incentivize asthe ~~amended~~users ~~and~~to ~~originally~~play ~~entered~~an ~~into~~active onpart ~~March~~in ~~12,~~the ~~2014~~growth (of the ~~"Agreement")~~Company’s ~~entered~~customer ~~into~~base ~~with Steel~~and ~~Pier~~brand. ~~Capital~~The ~~Advisors,~~StationDigital ~~LLC~~Listener ~~("Steel~~Rewards ~~Pier")~~Program ~~whereby~~allows the registered users to earn rewards points when they listen to StationDigital ~~acquired~~on ~~4,805,067~~the ~~shares~~Internet ofor ~~5,000,000~~through ~~shares of~~their ~~Common~~installed ~~Stock~~mobile ~~held~~apps byand ~~Steel~~every ~~Pier~~time they share StationDigital with friends through social media platforms. ~~The~~Upon ~~acquisition~~future release and availability of the ~~Shares~~StationDigital ~~resulted~~online insuperstore, ausers ~~change~~may inredeem ~~control~~rewards points for a variety of ~~the~~physical ~~Registrant~~or digital merchandise designed to appeal to all users.

~~Also~~The ~~on April 23, 2014, the Registrant authorized an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation to (i) change its name to~~ StationDigital ~~Corporation,~~mobile ~~(ii)~~app tois ~~increase the~~available number of its authorized shares of capital stock from 75,000,000 to 510,000,000 shares of which 500,000,000 shares were designated common stock, par value $0.001 per share and 10,000,000 shares were designated "blank check" preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share and (iii) to effect a forward split such that 17.6471 shares of Common Stock and Preferred Stock were issued for ~~every~~ 1both ~~share~~iOS ~~of Common Stock~~ and ~~Preferred~~Android ~~Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Amendment~~devices. The ~~Registrant~~mobile ~~also authorized~~app ais ~~conversion~~available ofin ~~its~~iTunes, ~~corporate~~Android ~~domicile~~Play, toand ~~the~~other ~~State~~app ~~of Delaware~~stores.

~~Also~~StationDigital onwas ~~April~~originally ~~23,~~organized ~~2014,~~as ~~the~~a ~~Registrant entered~~Missouri ~~into~~limited ~~and~~liability ~~consummated~~company ~~the~~on ~~Agreement~~November ~~and Plan of Merger with StationDigital~~14, ~~whereby~~2012 ~~StationDigital~~and ~~merged~~was ~~with~~subsequently ~~the~~converted ~~Registrant for~~to ~~approximately~~a ~~3,400,000~~Delaware ~~pre~~C-~~Split~~Corporation ~~shares~~on ofNovember ~~the Company's Common Stock and 56 shares of a newly-created Series A Preferred Stock. Further~~18, ~~the Registrant amended its By-laws to change its fiscal year end to December 31st; the change is intended to align the Registrant's fiscal periods with that of StationDigital's business~~2013.

On April 23, 2014, StationDigital isconsummated a ~~multimedia digital~~Stock ~~broadcast~~Purchase ~~company~~Agreement, ~~that~~as ~~offers~~amended ~~free~~and ~~music~~originally ~~streaming~~entered ~~for~~into ~~millions~~on ofMarch ~~songs.~~12, 2014 (the "Agreement") with Steel Pier Capital Advisors, LLC ("Steel Pier") whereby StationDigital ~~features~~acquired ~~both~~4,805,067 ~~genre-based~~of ~~and artist-based~~5,000,000 ~~music~~shares ~~discovery~~of ~~stations~~common tostock ~~suit~~(the an“Shares”) ~~endless~~of ~~variety~~Alarming Devices, Inc. (“the Registrant”) held by Steel Pier. The acquisition of ~~musical~~the ~~tastes~~Shares ~~and~~resulted in a ~~personal~~change ~~recommendation~~in ~~service~~control -of ~~all available~~the ~~both~~Registrant ~~online~~ and ~~through~~was ~~its~~accounted ~~iOS~~for ~~and~~as ~~Android~~a ~~mobile~~“reverse ~~apps~~merger” rather than a business combination.

~~Our~~Also ~~StationDigital~~on ~~Listener~~April ~~Rewards Program~~23, is2014, ~~designed~~the toRegistrant ~~incentivize~~authorized ~~our~~an ~~users~~amendment to ~~play~~its anArticles ~~active~~of ~~part~~Incorporation into ~~the~~(i) ~~growth~~change ofits ~~our~~name ~~customer~~from ~~base~~Alarming ~~and~~Devices, ~~brand~~Inc. ~~The~~to StationDigital ~~Listener~~ ~~Rewards~~Corporation, ~~Program~~(ii) ~~allows~~to ~~our~~increase ~~registered~~the ~~users~~number toof ~~earn~~its ~~rewards~~authorized ~~points~~shares ~~when~~of ~~they~~capital ~~listen~~stock from 75,000,000 to ~~StationDigital~~510,000,000 onshares ~~the~~of ~~Internet or~~which ~~through~~500,000,000 ~~our~~shares ~~mobile~~were ~~apps~~designated common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Common Stock”) and ~~every~~10,000,000 ~~time~~shares ~~they~~were designated "blank check" preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share ~~StationDigital~~(“Preferred ~~with~~Stock”) ~~friends~~and ~~through~~(iii) ~~social~~to ~~media~~effect a forward split such that 17.6471 ~~Rewards~~shares ~~points~~of ~~can~~Common beStock ~~redeemed through~~and ~~the~~Preferred ~~StationDigital~~Stock ~~online~~were ~~superstore~~issued for aevery ~~variety~~one (1) share of ~~physical~~Common orStock ~~digital~~and ~~merchandise~~Preferred ~~designed~~Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to ~~appeal~~the amendment. The Registrant also authorized a change of its corporate domicile to ~~users~~the State of ~~all kinds~~Delaware.

~~StationDigital~~Also ison ~~guided~~April by23, ~~the ambition~~2014, ~~to be~~ the ~~first~~Registrant ~~free~~entered ~~Internet~~into ~~radio~~and ~~platform~~consummated tothe ~~evolve~~Agreement ~~into~~and aPlan ~~comprehensive~~of ~~digital~~Merger ~~media~~with ~~broadcast~~the ~~platform~~Company, ~~available on~~whereby ~~any~~the ~~device,~~Company ~~anywhere,~~merged ~~anytime.~~with Tothe ~~that~~Registrant ~~end~~for approximately 3,400,000 ~~StationDigital~~pre-split ~~intends~~shares toof ~~steadily~~the ~~add~~Company's ~~music~~Common ~~videos,~~Stock ~~movies,~~and ~~television~~988 ~~programming, specialty~~shares ~~programming~~of ~~and~~a ~~video~~newly-created ~~games~~Series toA ~~our~~Preferred ~~platform~~Stock. ofFurther, ~~digital~~the ~~media~~Registrant ~~and~~amended ~~entertainment~~its ~~which~~By-laws ~~will~~to bechange ~~available~~its tofiscal ~~our~~year ~~users~~end ~~at all~~to ~~times~~December 31st. WeThe ~~intend~~change ~~our~~aligned ~~rewards~~the ~~program~~Registrant's tofiscal ~~extend~~periods towith ~~each~~that ~~additional~~of ~~digital~~the ~~media~~Company’s. ~~offering~~Subsequently onin 2015 the ~~StationDigital~~Series ~~platform~~A Preferred Stock was retired.

The StationDigital mobile app is now available for both iTunes and Android. We expect the mobile app will soon be available in the other app stores, with the ultimate goal of increasing our reach to 100% of the mobile devices in use. Mobility is at the heart of our growing listener base in internet radio, and our marketing efforts are expanding beyond our browser focused initiatives and into a series of highly targeted mobile ad campaigns across multiple ad platforms with the goal of aggressively promoting brand recognition and increasing mobile app installs of StationDigital.

~~STATIONDIGITAL~~Basis ~~CORPORATION~~of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (A“GAAP”) ~~DEVELOPMENT~~and ~~STAGE~~in ~~COMPANY~~conformity with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 8-03 of Regulation S-X and the related rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Accordingly, certain information and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. However, we believe that the disclosures included in these financial statements are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The unaudited condensed financial statements included in this document have been prepared on the same basis as the annual consolidated financial statements, and in our opinion reflect all adjustments, which include normal recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation in accordance with GAAP and SEC regulations for interim financial statements. The results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results that we will have for any subsequent period. These unaudited condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes to those statements for the year ended December 31, 2014 included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K.

~~NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~Reclassifications

~~Additionally,~~The asCompany ~~the~~has ~~markets~~reclassified ~~for~~prior ~~digital media~~year ~~consumption~~amounts ~~expand~~to ~~beyond~~conform ~~laptops and mobile devices~~ to the ~~living~~current ~~room~~year ~~and the car, StationDigital intends to compete for those consumers as well~~presentation.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of condensed unaudited financial statements in conformity with ~~U.S.~~GAAP ~~generally accepted accounting principles~~ requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to the recoverability of deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company's estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents.

Financial Instruments

The fair values of financial instruments, which include cash, notes payables, convertible note payables, derivatives, and amounts due to related parties, were estimated to approximate their carrying values due to the immediate or relatively short maturity of these instruments.

The Company's operations and financing activities are conducted primarily in United States dollars, and as a result the Company is not subject to significant exposure to market risks from changes in foreign currency rates. Management has determined that the Company is not exposed to significant credit risk.

Business Segments

The Company operates in one segment and therefore segment information is not presented.

Loss Per Share

The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260 "Earnings per Share". ASC 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share ("EPS") on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period including warrants and stock options, using the treasury stock method, and convertible notes, convertible preferred stock, using the if-converted method.

In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential common shares if their effect is anti-dilutive.

8Basic and diluted loss per common share is computed by dividing net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the periods. Potential common shares used in computing diluted earnings per share related to stock options, warrants, preferred stock and convertible debt which, if exercised, would have an anti- dilutive effect on earnings per share, and therefore have not been included. Anti-dilutive securities not included in net loss per share calculations for the years presented include:

STATIONDIGITAL CORPORATION

Potentially dilutive securities:	June 30, 2015		December 31, 2014

Convertible debt and accrued interest		20,359,924		8,083,285
Liability of shares to be issued		1,690,637		505,898
Outstanding Time Based Warrants		6,505,000		4,875,000

~~(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)~~9

~~NOTES~~Derivative TOFinancial ~~FINANCIAL~~Instruments ~~STATEMENTS~~

Derivative financial instruments consist of financial instruments or other contracts that contain a notional amount and one or more underlying values (e.g. interest rate, security price or other variable) that require no initial net investment and permit net settlement. Derivative financial instruments may be free-standing or embedded in other financial instruments. Further, derivative financial instruments are, initially, and subsequently, measured at fair value and recorded as liabilities or, assets. The Company generally does not use derivative financial instruments to hedge exposures to cash-flow, market or foreign-currency risks. However, the Company has entered into various types of financing arrangements to fund its business capital requirements, including convertible debt and other financial instruments. These contracts require evaluation to determine whether derivative features embedded in host contracts require bifurcation and fair value measurement or, in the case of freestanding derivatives (principally warrants) whether certain conditions for equity classification have been achieved. In instances where derivative financial instruments require liability classification, the Company is required to initially and subsequently measure such instruments at fair value.

Derivative financial instruments are initially recorded at fair value and subsequently adjusted to fair value at the close of each reporting period. The Company estimates fair values of derivative financial instruments using various techniques (and combinations thereof) that are considered to be consistent with the objective measuring fair values. In selecting the appropriate technique, management considers, among other factors, the nature of the instrument, the market risks that it embodies and the expected means of settlement. For less complex derivative instruments, such as free-standing warrants, the Company generally uses the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation technique because it embodies all of the requisite assumptions (including trading volatility, dividend yield, estimated terms and risk free rates) necessary to fair value of these instruments. Estimating fair values of derivative financial instruments requires the development of significant and subjective estimates that may, and are likely to, change over the duration of the instrument with related changes in internal and external market factors. In addition, option-based techniques are highly volatile and sensitive to changes in the trading market price of our common stock, which historically has a high volatility. Since derivative financial instruments are initially and subsequently carried at fair values, our income (loss) will reflect the volatility in these estimate and assumption changes.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under FASB ~~accounting~~ ~~standards~~Accounting ~~codification~~Standards Codification No. 740, ~~income~~Income ~~taxes~~Taxes. Under FASB accounting standards codification No. 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Valuation allowances are established, when necessary, to reduce deferred tax assets to the amounts expected to be realized. ~~The tax return for the period ended December 31, 2014 is subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service.~~

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company measures the fair value of its assets and liabilities under the guidance of ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ASC 820 does not require any new fair value measurements, but its provisions apply to all other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurement. ASC 820 clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants based on the highest and best use of the asset or liability. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. ASC 820 requires the Company to use valuation techniques to measure fair value that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. These inputs are prioritized as follows:

Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets;

Level 2: Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities or market-corroborated inputs; and

Level 3: Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions about how market participants would price the assets or liabilities. The valuation techniques that may be used to measure fair value are as follows:

A. Market approach - Uses prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities. B. Income approach - Uses valuation techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount based on current market expectations about those future amounts, including present value techniques, option-pricing models and excess earnings method. C. Cost approach - Based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost).

B.Pursuant ~~Income~~to ~~approach~~ASC -820, ~~Uses~~the ~~valuation~~fair ~~techniques~~value toof ~~convert~~cash ~~future~~and ~~amounts~~marketable tosecurities ais ~~single~~determined ~~present amount~~ based on ~~current~~“Level ~~market~~1” ~~expectations~~inputs, ~~about~~which ~~those~~consist ~~future~~of ~~amounts~~quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. The Company believes that the recorded values of cash, ~~including~~accounts ~~present~~receivables, ~~value~~marketable ~~techniques~~securities, ~~option-pricing~~accounts ~~models~~payable and ~~excess~~accrued ~~earnings~~liabilities, ~~method~~notes payables, convertible note payables and relative party payables approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective relatively short maturity dates or durations.

~~C. Cost approach - Based on the amount that currently would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost).~~11

9The carrying amounts of the Company’s convertible note payable derivative liability, warrant derivative liability, convertible note payables, and related party convertible note payables in the condensed balance sheets as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 approximate their fair values.

~~STATIONDIGITAL~~Change ~~CORPORATION~~in convertible note payable derivative liability during the six months ended June 30, 2015 were as follows:

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

Opening Balance at December 31, 2014	$	1,775,404
Initial valuation of additional derivatives		610,859
Gain on change in fair value of derivative
liability		(625,776	)
Closing balance at June 30, 2015	$	1,760,487

~~NOTES~~Change TOin ~~FINANCIAL~~warrant ~~STATEMENTS~~derivative liability during the six months ended June 30, 2015 were as follows:

Pursuant to ASC 825, the fair value of cash and marketable securities is determined based on “Level 1” inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. The Company believes that the recorded values of cash, accounts receivables, marketable securities, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and notes payable approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective relatively short maturity dates or durations.

Opening Balance at December 31, 2014	$	1,732,881
Initial valuation of additional derivatives		248,440
Gain on change in fair value of derivative
liability		(1,022,850	)
Closing balance at June 30, 2015	$	958,471

Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis were presented on the Company’s balance sheets as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 as follows:

	Fair Value Measurements as of March 31, 2015 Using:
	Total Carrying Value as of		Quoted Market Prices in Active Markets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
	03/31/15		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Liabilities:
Convertible note payable derivative liability	$	2,007,326	$	0	$	0	$	2,007,326
Warrant derivative liability		1,883,943		0		0		1,883,943
Total	$	3,891,269	$	0	$	0	$	3,891,269

	Fair Value Measurements as of December 31, 2014 Using:
	Total Carrying Value as of		Quoted Market Prices in Active Markets		Significant Other Observable Inputs		Significant Unobservable Inputs
	12/31/14		(Level 1)		(Level 2)		(Level 3)
Liabilities:
Convertible note payable derivative liability	$	1,775,404	$	0	$	0	$	1,775,404
Warrant derivative liability		1,732,881		0		0		1,732,881
Total	$	3,508,285	$	0	$	0	$	3,508,285

Change in convertible note payable derivative liability during the 3 months ended March 31, 2015 were as follows:

Opening balance at December 31, 2014	$	1,775,404
Initial valuation of additional derivatives		344,153
Gain on change in fair value of derivative liability		(112,231	)
Closing balance at March 31, 2015	$	2,007,326

Change in warrant derivative liability during the 3 months ended March 31, 2015 were as follows:

Opening balance at December 31, 2014	$	1,732,881
Initial valuation of additional derivatives		205,847
Gain on change in fair value of derivative Liability		(54,785	)
Closing balance at March 31, 2015	$	1,883,943

STATIONDIGITAL CORPORATION

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Product Development

Product development consists primarily of software engineering and design, metadata, information technology and costs associated with supporting consumer connected-device manufacturers in implementing our service in their products. We have incurred product development expenses primarily to develop and improve our system, website and the StationDigital app.

We account for our development costs in accordance with ASC 350-50-25, which sets forth the appropriate method of accounting for each of the five stages of website development. The costs incurred during the planning stage were expensed as incurred; the costs incurred for activities during the website application and infrastructure development stage were capitalized in accordance with ASC 350-40; costs incurred during the graphics development stage were capitalized for costs that were for the creation of initial graphics for the website, subsequent updates to the initial graphics were expensed as incurred, unless they provided additional functionality; costs incurred during the content development stage were expensed as incurred unless they were for the integration of a database with our website, which were capitalized; and generally, the costs incurred during the operating stage have been expensed as incurred.

Capitalized amounts are amortized over the useful life of the related application.

Revenue Recognition

The Company ~~will~~recognizes ~~recognize~~ revenue on arrangements in accordance with FASB ASC No. 605, "Revenue Recognition". In all cases, revenue is recognized only when the price is fixed and determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service is performed and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured. The Company ~~will~~recognizes ~~recognize~~ revenue from advertising and online sales at the time services are rendered.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Accounts receivable are recorded net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Our allowance for doubtful accounts will be based upon historical loss patterns, the number of days that billings are past due and an evaluation of the potential risk of loss associated with delinquent accounts. We also consider any changes to the financial condition of our customers and any other external market factors that could impact the collectability of our receivables in the determination of our allowance for doubtful accounts.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method based on the estimated useful lives of the assets, which is three years.

Property and equipment is reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of these assets is measured by a comparison of the carrying amounts to the future undiscounted cash flows the assets are expected to generate. If property and equipment are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized equals the amount by which the carrying value of the asset exceeds its fair market value.

11Software, Website and Applications Development Costs

~~STATIONDIGITAL~~Costs ~~CORPORATION~~incurred to develop software for internal use are required to be capitalized and amortized over the estimated useful life of the asset if certain criteria are met. Costs related to preliminary project activities and post implementation activities are expensed as incurred. We evaluate the costs incurred during the application development stage of website development to determine whether the costs meet the criteria for capitalization. As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had approximately $0 and $317,119, respectively, of capitalized internal use software and website development costs, net of accumulated amortization. These costs are being amortized over their three year estimated useful lives. Version 2 of the Company’s streaming music platform as released on April 1, 2015 and amortization commenced at that time. During the three months ended June 30, 2015, the Company determined the website developments costs were impaired and wrote them off. The Company reached this conclusion after determining its lack of operations gave rise to the asset no longer having any value. For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2015, the Company recorded software amortization expense of $54,725. For the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2014 the Company recorded software amortization expense of $20,922 and $41,844, respectively. These amortization expenses are included in the loss on asset impairment in the Company’s Statement of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2015.

(AAsset ~~DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)~~Impairment

~~NOTES~~A TOcapital ~~FINANCIAL~~asset ~~STATEMENTS~~is considered impaired when its service utility has declined significantly and unexpectedly. The events or changes in circumstances affecting a capital asset that may indicate impairment should be prominent (i.e., conspicuous or known to the Company). That is, the events or circumstances that may indicate impairment generally are expected to have already been the subject of discussion by the management.

~~Website~~Common ~~Development~~indicators ~~Costs~~that a capital asset may be impaired are: evidence of physical damage, changes in legal or environmental factors, technological change or obsolescence, changes in manner or duration of use, or construction stoppage that negatively affects the accumulated work performed.

~~Costs~~The ~~incurred~~Company toassesses ~~develop~~its ~~software~~capital ~~for internal~~assets ~~use~~at ~~are~~least ~~required~~annually, toor bemore ~~capitalized~~frequently ~~and~~due ~~amortized~~to ~~over~~one ~~the estimated useful life~~ of the ~~asset~~above ifevents ~~certain~~occurring, ~~criteria are met. Costs related~~ to ~~preliminary~~determine ~~project~~if ~~activities~~it ~~and~~has ~~post~~any ~~implementation~~impaired ~~activities~~capital ~~are~~assets ~~expensed~~with asmaterial ~~incurred~~carrying values. WeIf ~~evaluate~~any ~~the~~such ~~costs incurred~~impaired ~~during~~capital ~~the~~assets ~~application~~are ~~development~~identified, ~~stage of website development to determine whether~~ the ~~costs~~Company ~~meet~~evaluates the ~~criteria~~related ~~for~~impairment ~~capitalization. As~~losses ~~of March 31, 2015~~ and ~~December~~makes ~~31,~~entries ~~2014,~~in ~~we had approximately $656,694 and $317,119, respectively, of capitalized internal use software and website development costs, net of accumulated amortization. These costs are being amortized over~~ their ~~three~~accounting ~~year estimated~~system ~~useful~~to ~~lives.~~report ~~For~~any ~~the~~such ~~three month period ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company recorded amortization expense of $0 and $20,922 respectively~~losses.

~~Derivative~~During ~~Financial~~the ~~Instruments~~three months ended June 30, 2015, the Company impaired its trademark asset to zero.

The Company has executed convertible notes and warrants that are deemed derivative financial instruments and are accounted for according to Financial Accounting Standards Board's ("FASB") Accounting Standards Codification's ("ASC") 815 "Derivatives and Hedging". Derivative financial instruments are assessed both at inception and quarterly thereafter to ensure they are effective in offsetting changes in the cash flows of the related underlying exposures; the effective portion of the change in fair value of the derivative instruments are reported as a component of "Other income (expense)" and reclassified into earnings in the period during which the transaction affects earnings.13

~~Beneficial~~Policy ~~Conversion~~for ~~Feature~~Financing Costs

The ~~conversion~~costs ~~features~~related ~~are~~to ~~first analyzed for bifurcation under ASC 815, then if~~ the ~~conversion~~issuance ~~features~~ of ~~conventional~~long-term ~~convertible~~ debt ~~provides~~are ~~for~~deferred aand ~~rate~~amortized ofinto ~~conversion that~~interest ~~is below market value~~expense, ~~this~~using ~~feature is characterized as a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”). A BCF is recorded by~~ the ~~Company~~effective asinterest ~~a debt discount pursuant to ASC Topic 470-20 “Debt with Conversion and Other Options.” In those circumstances~~method, ~~the convertible debt is recorded net of the discount related to the BCF and the Company amortizes the discount to interest expense~~ over the life of ~~the~~each debt ~~using the effective interest method~~issuance.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for employee stock-based compensation in accordance with the guidance of FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation which requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values. The fair value of the equity instrument is charged directly to compensation expense and credited to additional paid-in capital over the period during which services are rendered.

The Company follows ASC Topic 505-50, formerly EITF 96-18, "Accounting for Equity Instruments that are Issued to Other than Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling Goods and Services," for stock options and warrants issued to consultants and other non-employees. In accordance with ASC Topic 505-50, these stock options and warrants issued as compensation for services provided to the Company are accounted for based upon the fair value of the services provided or the estimated fair market value of the option or warrant, whichever can be more clearly determined.

Note 2 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements

~~Company~~In ~~management~~May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers,” Topic 606. This update affects any entity that either enters into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services or enters into contracts for the transfer of nonfinancial assets, unless those contracts are within the scope of other standards. The guidance in this update supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Topic 605, Revenue Recognition and most industry-specific guidance. The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to illustrate the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new guidance also includes a cohesive set of disclosure requirements that will provide users of financial statements with comprehensive information about the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from a reporting organization’s contracts with customers. This ASU was to be effective retrospectively for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2016 for public companies and 2017 for non-public entities, however the FASB has deferred the effective date by one year. The Company does not expect the adoption of ~~recently~~this ~~issued~~standard ~~accounting pronouncements~~ to have a significant impact on the Company'’s ~~results of operations,~~ financial position orand ~~cash~~results ~~flow~~of operations.

12In April 2015, the accounting standard which provides guidance on the presentation of debt issuance costs was updated. The new standard requires companies to present debt issuance costs the same way they currently present debt discounts. The standard does not impact the recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs. The update is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this standard is not expected to have any impact on the Company’s operating results and financial position.

~~STATIONDIGITAL CORPORATION~~14

(ANote ~~DEVELOPMENT~~3 ~~STAGE~~– ~~COMPANY)~~Going Concern

~~NOTES~~These TOfinancial ~~FINANCIAL~~statements ~~STATEMENTS~~have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies the Company will continue to realize it assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. As of June 30, 2015, the Company has an accumulated deficit of $20,459,683. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its lenders, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary equity financing to continue operations, and the attainment of profitable operations. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 24 – ~~Going~~Property ~~Concern~~and Equipment, Software and Other

~~These~~During ~~financial~~the ~~statements~~three ~~have~~months ~~been~~ended ~~prepared on~~June a30, ~~going concern basis~~2015, ~~which implies~~ the Company ~~will~~disposed ~~continue~~of toproperty ~~realize~~related itto ~~assets~~leased ~~and~~premises ~~discharge~~that ~~its~~are ~~liabilities~~now ~~in the normal course of business~~vacated. ~~From~~As ~~inception~~a ~~(November 14~~result, ~~2012)~~the ~~through~~Company ~~March~~recorded ~~31,~~a ~~2015,~~loss ~~the~~on ~~Company~~disposal ~~has~~of anthese ~~accumulated~~assets ~~deficit~~ of $1939,~~185~~691,~~304. The~~ ~~continuation~~which ~~of the Company as a going concern~~ is ~~dependent~~included ~~upon~~in ~~the continued financial support from~~ its ~~lenders,~~Statement ~~the ability~~ of ~~the~~Operations. ~~Company~~In toaddition ~~obtain necessary equity financing~~ to ~~continue operations, and~~ the ~~attainment~~loss ofon ~~profitable~~disposal, ~~operations. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding~~ the Company's ~~ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of~~ recorded ~~asset~~$9,000 ~~amounts and classification~~ of ~~liabilities~~depreciation ~~that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern~~expense.

~~Note~~Property 3and –equipment ~~Property~~consisted of the following as of June 30, 2015 and ~~Equipment~~December 31, 2014:

Property and equipment consisted of the following as of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

	June 30, 2015		December 31, 2014

Property, Plant and Equipment	$	-	$	53,994
Less accumulated depreciation		-		5,304
Property, Plant & Equipment, Net	$	-	$	48,690

	March 31, 2015		December 31, 2014
Computer & office equipment	$	53,994	$	53,994
Computer software		-		-
Property & Equipment, Total		53,994		53,994
Less accumulated depreciation		9,804		5,304
Property & Equipment, Net	$	44,190	$	48,690

During the three months ended June 30, 2015, the Company determined that its website development costs and trademarks were impaired and wrote them off. The Company reached this conclusion after determining its lack of operations gave rise to the asset no longer having any value. As a result, the Company recorded a loss on asset impairment of $634,179, which is included in other expense in its Statement of Operations. In addition to the loss on asset impairment, the recording of the write offs included the reversal of $22,515 of accumulated amortization.

~~Depreciation~~Website ~~expense~~development ~~during~~and ~~the~~trademarks ~~three~~consisted ~~months ended~~of ~~March 31, 2015 and~~ the ~~three~~following ~~months~~as ~~ended~~of ~~March~~June 3130, ~~2014~~2015 ~~was $4,500~~ and 3December 31,~~748,~~ ~~respectively.~~2014:

Note 4 - Related Party Transactions

	June 30, 2015		December 31, 2014

Amortized Software & Trademark Assets	$	-	$	345,224
Less accumulated Amortization		-		-
Software and Trademark Assets, Net	$	-	$	345,224

As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company was indebted to the Company's Chief Operating Officer in the amounts of $239,758 and $168,627, respectively. On May 1, 2015, the amount of indebtedness was $332,853 and, on this date, the Company executed a convertible promissory note for this amount. The note accrues interest at the rate of 15%, was due on June 1, 2015 which was subsequently extended to July 31, 2015 and is convertible at the holder's option into like securities of the Company's next offering at the lesser of a 30% discount to such offering price or $0.45 per share. The note is secured by a security interest in the Company’s assets, and is subordinate to the security interest pledged to Steel Pier Capital Advisors, LLC. The Company will evaluate the terms of the convertible note under FASB ASC 815 to determine if the convertible note requires derivative accounting treatment.

AsNote of5 ~~March~~- ~~31,~~Related ~~2015~~Party and December 31, 2014, the Company was indebted to Steel Pier Capital Advisors, LLC in the amounts of $550,959 and $532,466, respectively. The Company’s Chief Operating Officer as well as a Company Director are Venture Partners of Steel Pier Capital Advisors, LLC. The note accrues interest at a rate of 15% is convertible at the holder's option into like securities of the Company's next offering at the lesser of a 30% discount to such offering price or $0.45 per share. The note is secured by a security interest in all of the Company's assets. In connection with the issuance of the note, the Company also issued warrants to the Holder to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price equal to the lesser of 70% of the price of the common stock in the subsequent offering or $0.45 per share, which warrant shall expire five years after the date of issuance. The Company evaluated the terms of the convertible note and warrants under FASB ASC 815 and determined that the convertible note and warrants require derivative accounting treatment, which resulted in recognizing a discount of $500,000 on the note which is being amortized over the life of the note and derivative liability in the amount of $634,526 as of March 31, 2015.Transactions

13As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company was indebted to the Company's Chief Operating Officer and a Director in the amounts of $364,596 and $168,627, respectively. The note accrues interest at a rate of 15%, and was originally due on June 1, 2015 but was subsequently extended to July 31, 2015. The note was originally issued in August, 2014, but was cancelled and exchanged for a convertible note in May, 2015. The note is convertible at the holder's option into like securities of the Company's next offering at the lesser of a 30% discount to such offering price or $0.45 per share. The note is secured by a security interest in the Company’s assets, and is subordinate to the security interest pledged to Steel Pier Capital Advisors, LLC. The Company evaluated the terms of the convertible notes under FASB ASC 815 and applied derivative accounting treatment to the conversion feature. The discounted value of the note as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 is $298,406 and $168,627, respectively. The note is currently in default.

~~STATIONDIGITAL~~As ~~CORPORATION~~of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company was indebted to Steel Pier Capital Advisors, LLC in the amounts of $637,300 and $532,466, respectively. The note was issued on June 30, 2014. The Company’s Chief Operating Officer is on the board of directors of and an investor in the Steel Pier Capital Advisors, LLC. The note accrues interest at a rate of 15% and is convertible at the holder's option into like securities of the Company's next offering at the lesser of a 30% discount to such offering price or $0.45 per share. The note is secured by a security interest in all of the Company's assets. In connection with the issuance of the note, the Company also issued warrants to the holder to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at an exercise price equal to the lesser of 70% of the price of the Common Stock in the subsequent offering or $0.45 per share, which warrant shall expire five years after the date of issuance. The Company evaluates the terms of the convertible note and warrants at least annually under FASB ASC 815 and has determined that the convertible note and warrants required derivative accounting treatment. This resulted in recognizing a discount of $500,000 on the note which is being amortized over the life of the note and derivative liability in the amount of $270,500 as of June 30, 2015. The discounted value of the note as of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $441,729 and $187,500, respectively. This note is currently in default.

(AOn ~~DEVELOPMENT~~May ~~STAGE~~13, ~~COMPANY)~~2015, the Company issued 325,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer having a fair value of $113,750 at $0.35 per share.

~~NOTES~~On TOMay ~~FINANCIAL~~14 ~~STATEMENTS~~2015, the Company issued a convertible note payable to a Director of the Company in the $75,000. The note accrues interest at a rate of 15% and is convertible at the holder's option into like securities of the Company's next offering at the lesser of a 30% discount to such offering price or $0.45 per share. The note is secured by a security interest in all of the Company's assets. In connection with the issuance of the note, the Company also issued warrants to the holder to purchase 150,000 shares of the Company's Common Stock at an exercise price equal to the lesser of 70% of the price of the Common Stock in the subsequent offering or $0.45 per share, which warrant shall expire five years after the date of issuance. The Company evaluated the terms of the convertible note and warrants under FASB ASC 815 and has determined that the convertible note and warrants required derivative accounting treatment. This resulted in recognizing a discount of $75,000 on the note which is being amortized over the life of the note and derivative liability in the amount of $55,654 as of June 30, 2015. The discounted value of the note as of June 30, 2015 was $12,726.

~~Note 5 - Convertible Promissory Notes~~16

OnNote ~~January~~6 ~~26,~~- ~~2015,~~Convertible ~~the~~Promissory Company borrowed $50,000 under a convertible senior secured note. The note accrues interest at the rate of 15%, is due on October 27, 2015 and is convertible at the holder's option into like securities of the Company's next offering at the lesser of a 30% discount to such offering price or $0.45 per share. The note is secured by a security interest in all of the Company's assets. In connection with the issuance of the note, the Company also issued warrants to the Holder to purchase 100,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price equal to the lesser of 70% of the price of the common stock in the subsequent offering or $0.45 per share, which warrant shall expire five years after the date of issuance. The Company evaluated the terms of the convertible note and warrants under FASB ASC 815 and determined that the convertible note and warrants require derivative accounting treatment which resulted in recognizing a discount of $50,000 on the note which is being amortized over the life of the note and derivative liability in the amount of $77,702 as of March 31, 2015.Notes

OnDuring ~~March 17,~~ 2015, the Company borrowed a total of $~~500~~590,000 under afour convertible senior secured ~~note~~notes. The ~~note~~notes ~~accrues~~accrue interest at the rate of 15%, ~~is due on December 16, 2015~~ and is are convertible at the holder's option into like securities of the Company's next offering at the lesser of a 30% discount to such offering price or $0.45 per share. The ~~note~~notes isare secured by a security interest in all of the Company's assets. In connection with the issuance of the ~~note~~notes, the Company also issued warrants to the Holder to purchase 1,~~000~~180,000 shares of the Company's ~~common~~Common ~~stock~~ Stock at an exercise price equal to the lesser of 70% of the price of the ~~common~~Common ~~stock~~Stock in the subsequent offering or $0.45 per share, which warrant shall expire five years after the date of issuance. The Company evaluated the terms of the convertible ~~note~~notes and warrants under FASB ASC 815 and determined that the convertible note and warrants require derivative accounting treatment which resulted in recognizing a discount ofthat ~~$500,000 on the note which~~ is being amortized over the life of the note ~~and derivative liability in the amount of $797~~,~~513~~ asalong ofwith ~~March~~derivative ~~31, 2015~~liabilities.

The following table summarizes the details of each of the notes:

Convertible Notes Payable Issued in 2015 as of June 30, 2015

					Unamortized		Net Value		Derivative
	Date	Maturity	Face		Discount		Note Payable		Liability

Note 1	01/26/15	10/16/15	$	50,000	$	21,715	$	28,285	$	49,469
Note 2	03/17/15	12/16/15		500,000		308,394		191,606		515,527
Note 3	05/01/15	02/01/16		30,000		23,502		6,498		31,942
Note 4	05/04/15	02/04/16		10,000		7,942		2,058		10,640
Totals			$	590,000	$	361,553	$	228,447	$	607,579

Defaults on Convertible Promissory Notes

The company has issued 17 senior secured notes totaling $2,852,500 with issue dates ranging from June 30, 2014 to May 14, 2015. As of the date of this report, 12 of these notes with a face value of $2,187,500 and a book value of $1,685,161 are in default.

(A) Derivative liability- convertible notes

The ~~Convertible~~convertible ~~Promissory~~promissory ~~Notes with~~notes Steel Pier Capital Partners, LLC with an issue date of June 30, 2014, Gene Salkind with an issue date of August 15, 2014, 25 NB LLC with an issue date of September 25, 2014, Alan Miller Living Trust with an issue date of September 25, 2014, Robert Coven, with an issue date of September 25, 2014, Pjake301LLC with an issue date of September 25, 2014, Mark Neuberger with an issue date of September 25, 2014, Irwin Blitt Revocable Trust with an issue date of September 25, 2014, FETRA with an issue date of November 2, 2014, Frederick Daniel Gable with an issue date of November 2, 2014, Beneficial Capital Corp. with an issue date of November 2, 2014, Eagle Venture Management, LLC with an issue date of November 7, 2014, Steve Gosch with an issue date of January 26, 2015 and WS Irrevocable Trust with an issue date of March 17, 2015 have an initial conversion price that is subject to anti-dilution adjustments that allow for the reduction in the ~~Conversion~~conversion ~~Price~~price in the event the Company subsequently issues equity securities including common stock or any security convertible or exchangeable for shares of common stock for no consideration or for consideration less than original conversion price.

The Company’s convertible promissory note derivative liabilities due to anti-dilution adjustments has been measured at fair value at March 31, 2015 using a binomial model. The value of the derivative liability as of March 31, 2015 is $2,007,326. Since the Conversion Price contains an anti-dilution adjustment, the probability that the Conversion Price of the Notes would decrease as the share price decreased was incorporated into the valuation calculation.17

The derivative liabilities have been measured at fair value at issuance and each reporting period using a binomial model.

The inputs into the binomial models are as follows:

Conversion price	$	0.36
Stock Price		$	0.25
Risk free rate	0.14		%
Conversion price		$	0.18
Expected volatility	130% - 176		%
Risk free rate			0.11%
Dividend yield	0		%
Expected volatility		128% - 136%
Expected life	0.12 years – 0.71 years
Dividend yield			0%
Average expected life		0.63 years

STATIONDIGITAL CORPORATION

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(B) Derivative liability- warrants

In conjunction with the issuance of the ~~Convertible~~convertible ~~Promissory~~promissory ~~Note issued to Steel Pier Capital Partners~~notes, LLC with an issue date of June 30, 2014, Gene Salkind with an issue date of August 15, 2014, 25 NB LLC with an issue date of September 25, 2014, Alan Miller Living Trust with an issue date of September 25, 2014, Robert Coven, with an issue date of September 25, 2014, Pjake301LLC with an issue date of September 25, 2014, Mark Neuberger with an issue date of September 25, 2014, Irwin Blitt Revocable Trust with an issue date of September 25, 2014, FETRA with an issue date of November 2, 2014, Frederick Daniel Gable with an issue date of November 2, 2014 Beneficial Capital Corp. with an issue date of November 2, 2014, Eagle Venture Management, LLC with an issue date of November 7, 2014, Steve Gosch with an issue date of January 26, 2015 and WS Irrevocable Trust with an issue date of March 17, 2015, the Company issued warrants to purchase 5,~~475~~705,000 shares of ~~common~~Common ~~stock~~Stock with an exercise price equal to the lesser of 70% of the price of the ~~common~~Common ~~stock~~Stock in the subsequent offering or $0.45 per share and a life of five years.

The ~~warrant~~warrants isare subject to anti-dilution adjustments that allow for the reduction in the conversion price in the event the Company subsequently issues equity securities including common stock or any security convertible or exchangeable for shares of common stock for no consideration or for consideration less than ~~price equal to~~ the ~~lesser~~exercise ~~of 70% of the~~ price ~~of the common stock in the subsequent offering or $0~~.45 ~~per share.~~ The Company accounted for the conversion option in accordance with ASC Topic 815. Accordingly, the ~~Conversion~~conversion ~~Option~~option is not considered to be solely indexed to the Company’s own stock and, as such, is recorded as a liability.

The warrant derivative liability has been measured at fair value at ~~March~~issuance ~~31,~~and ~~2015~~each reporting period using a Black-Scholes model. The value of the derivative liability as of March 31, 2015 is $1,883,944. Since the Conversion Price contains an anti-dilution adjustment, the probability that the exercise price of the Notes would decrease as the share price decreased was incorporated into the valuation calculation.

The inputs into the Black-Scholes model are as follows:

Risk free rate	1.37	%
Stock price		$	0.25
Expected volatility	74	%
Exercise price			0.17
Dividend yield	0	%
Risk free rate			1.63%
Expected life	4.61 - 4.96 years
Expected volatility			78%
Dividend yield			0%
Expected life		4.36 - 4.87 years

~~Note 6 - Promissory Notes~~18

OnNote ~~February~~7 6,- ~~2015,~~Promissory the Company borrowed $500,000 under a promissory note. The note accrues interest at the rate of 15% and was originally due on March 23, 2015 and was in default as of March 31, 2015; on May 6, 2015, the maturity date was extended to June 19, 2015.Notes

~~Note~~On 7February ~~- Equity~~6, 2015, the Company borrowed $500,000 and issued a promissory note. The note accrues interest at an annual rate of 15% and was originally due on March 23, 2015. The note was in default and the maturity date was extended to August 15, 2015. However, shortly before the maturity date the Company and the holder of the note reached an agreement whereby the holder agrees to forbear its rights under the note until no later than October 2, 2015 in exchange for, among other conditions, a $25,000 forbearance fee, which was paid at the time the agreement was executed in August, 2015.

In addition, during the three months ended June 30, 2015, the Company entered into various promissory note agreements in the amount of $73,564 with simple annual interest rates ranging from 15% to 18% annually with maturity dates ranging from 30 to 90 days from the date of issuance. $50,000 of these notes were repaid during the same period. All notes are currently in default.

Note 8 - Equity

(A) Stock Issued for Services

OnIn ~~February~~the 2,first quarter of 2015, the Company issued ~~150~~ 550,000 shares of restricted ~~common~~Common ~~stock~~Stock for services to aconsultants ~~consultant~~ having a fair value of $52195,~~500~~000, ~~($0.35~~inclusive ~~per~~of ~~share)~~the 275,000 shares issued for financial advisory services.

OnIn ~~February~~the 5,second quarter of 2015, the Company issued ~~250~~ 1,483,000 shares of restricted ~~common~~Common ~~stock~~Stock for services to aconsultants ~~consultant~~and vendors having a fair value of $82465,~~500~~860, ~~($0~~inclusive of related party transactions.33 ~~per~~This ~~share)~~is inclusive of 325,000 shares of restricted Common Stock for services to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer having a fair value of $113,750.

15(B) Warrants

~~STATIONDIGITAL~~The ~~CORPORATION~~following is a summary of the warrants granted, forfeited or expired and exercised:

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

			Weighted
	Number of		average exercise
	Warrants		price per share

Warrants Outstanding - December 31, 2014		4,875,000	$	0.30
Granted		1,630,000		0.22
Excercised		-		-
Warrants Outstanding		6,505,000		0.21
Warrants Excercisable		6,505,000		0.21

~~NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~19

OnThe ~~March~~following ~~20,~~table ~~2015,~~summarizes ~~the~~information ~~Company~~on ~~issued~~warrants ~~50,000 shares~~exercisable ofas ~~restricted common stock for services to a consultant having a fair value~~ of ~~$20~~June 30,~~000~~ ~~($0.40 per share).~~2015:

On March 20, 2015, the Company issued 100,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to a consultant having a fair value of $40,000 ($0.40 per share).

		Number		Average
		Outstanding		Remaining		Aggregate
Exercise		at		Life		Intrinsic
Price		June 30, 2015		(Years)		Value

$	0.18		5,705,000		4.39		$	456,400
$	0.50		500,000		1.77		$	0
$	0.45		300,000		2.00		$	0

~~(B)~~The ~~Stock~~5,705,000 ~~Options~~were issued in conjunction with convertible notes as the notes were sold at various times in 2014 and ~~Warrants~~2015 entitling the holder to purchase shares of the Company's Common Stock at an exercise price equal to the lesser of 70% of the price of the Common Stock in the subsequent offering or $0.45 per share, which warrant shall expire five years after the date of issuance.

The ~~following~~500,000 iswere issued on April 4, 2014, in conjunction with a ~~summary~~consulting agreement at an exercise price of ~~the~~$0.50 ~~common stock~~per ~~options~~share and ~~warrants~~expire ~~granted,~~three ~~forfeited~~years orafter ~~expired~~the ~~and~~date ~~exercised:~~of issuance.

			Weighted
			Average
			Exercise
	Number of		Price
	Options/Warrants		Per Share
Outstanding - December 31, 2014		4,875,000	$	0.30
Granted		1,100,000	$	0.36
Forfeited or expired		-	$	-
Exercised		-	$	-
Outstanding- March 31, 2015		5,975,000	$	0.38
Exercisable - March 31, 2015		5,975,000	$	0.38

The 300,000 were issued on June 26, 2015, in conjunction with a consulting agreement at an exercise price of $0.45 per share and expire two years after the date of issuance.

The following table summarizes information on stock options exercisable as of March 31, 2015:

		Number		Average
		Outstanding		Remaining		Aggregate
Exercise		at		Life		Intrinsic
Price		March 31, 2015		(Years)		Value
$	0.36		5,475,000		4.62	$	854,100
$	0.50		500,000		2.02	$	10,000

The 1,100,000 warrants were issued in conjunction with convertible notes entitling the Holder to purchase shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price equal to the lesser of 70% of the price of the common stock in the subsequent offering or $0.45 per share, which warrant shall expire five years after the date of issuance. The Company evaluated the terms of the convertible note and warrants under FASB ASC 815 and determined that the convertible note and warrants require derivative accounting treatment which results in recognizing discounts of $205,847 on the notes to be amortized over the life of the note; as of March 31, 2015, the Company has accrued a warrant derivative liability of $1,883,561 for these warrants. See Note 5 (B) for additional disclosure.

STATIONDIGITAL CORPORATION

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(C) Stock Payable

The following is a summary of the shares of common stock ~~shares~~ accrued, earned and issued as compensation for members of the Company’s Advisory Board:

			Price
As of December 31, 2014		505,898	$	0.40	$	202,359
	Number		Per		Stock
Earned		1,184,738		-		-
	of Shares		Share		Payable
Less: issued		-		-		-
Accrued as of December 31, 2014		505,898	$	0.4000	$	202,359
As of June 30, 2015		1,690,636	$	0.25	$	414,206
Earned		267,369				184,275
Less: issued		-
Accrued as of March 31, 2015		773,267	$	0.5000	$	386,634

The ~~following~~Company ~~are~~accounts ~~additional~~for ~~common~~employee stock ~~shares~~-based ~~that~~compensation ~~have~~in ~~been~~accordance ~~accrued~~with ~~and~~the ~~earned~~guidance ~~but~~of ~~not~~FASB ~~issued~~ASC asTopic of718, ~~March~~Compensation ~~31,~~– ~~2015:~~Stock Compensation which requires all share-based payments to employees to be recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values.

~~On January 15, 2015, the Company accrued 15,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to a consultant having a fair value of $6,000 ($0.40 per share).~~20

OnNote ~~February~~9 ~~15,~~– ~~2015,~~Commitments ~~the~~and ~~Company accrued 15,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to a consultant having a fair value of $6,000 ($0.40 per share).~~Contingencies

On March 5, 2015, the Company accrued 25,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to a consultant having a fair value of $9,750 ($0.39 per share).

On March 10, 2015, the Company accrued 150,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer having a fair value of $54,000 ($0.36 per share); the Company realized a $16,000 loss on this share issuance.

On March 15, 2015, the Company accrued 15,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to a consultant having a fair value of $5,850 ($0.39 per share).

On March 20, 2015, the Company accrued 50,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to a consultant having a fair value of $20,000 ($0.40 per share).

Note 8 – Commitments and Contingencies

Legal Proceedings

We are from time to time subject to various legal proceedings and claims arising in the ordinary course of our business. We record a liability when we believe that it is both probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. Our management periodically evaluates developments that could affect the amount, if any, of liability that we have previously accrued and make adjustments as appropriate. Determining both the likelihood and the estimated amount of a loss requires significant judgment, and management's judgment may be incorrect. We do not believe the ultimate resolution of any pending legal matters is likely to have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position, results of operations or cash flows. The Company believes it has adequately accrued for all matters below.

17On September 8, 2014, Andrew Gladney filed a complaint against the Company and a co-defendant, CloudWebStore, Inc. in the 21st Judicial Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, State of Missouri, alleging that the Company and CloudWebStore failed to compensate him for services rendered pursuant to a consulting agreement and related correspondence. Mr. Gladney is seeking damages in excess of $25,000 and 5 million shares of Common Stock. The Company intends to vigorously defend its interests.

~~STATIONDIGITAL~~On ~~CORPORATION~~April 15, 2015, Performance Revenue, LT filed a Notice of Filing of Foreign Country Money Judgment against the Company in the 21st Judicial Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, State of Missouri, in connection with a Foreign Country Money Judgment entered by the Magistrate Court of Tel-Aviv-Yaffo in the State of Israel in favor of Performance Revenue, LT for indebtedness in the amount of approximately NIS 653,869 (approximately US $168,910).

(AOn ~~DEVELOPMENT~~May ~~STAGE~~8, ~~COMPANY)~~2015, Millennial Media Inc. filed a complaint against the Company in the 21st Judicial Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, State of Missouri, alleging indebtedness related to goods, wares, merchandise and services sold by Millennial Media, Inc. to the Company and seeks damages in the amount of $394,859.

~~NOTES~~On TOMay ~~FINANCIAL~~18, ~~STATEMENTS~~2015, Yahoo! Inc. filed a complaint against the Company in 22nd Judicial Circuit Court of City of St. Louis County, Missouri alleging indebtedness in relation to a services contract and seeks damages in the amount of $30,000 together with annual interest at the rate of 9% commencing on June 1, 2014 and related court costs.

On September 8, 2014, Andrew Gladney filed a complaint against the Company and a co-defendant, CloudWebStore, Inc. in the 21st Judicial Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, State of Missouri, alleging that the Company and CloudWebStore failed to compensate him for services rendered pursuant to a consulting agreement and related correspondence. Mr. Gladney is seeking damages in excess of $25,000 and 5 million shares of common stock. The Company intends to vigorously defend its interests.21

On April 15, 2015, Performance Revenue, LT filed a Notice of Filing of Foreign Country Money Judgment against the Company in the 21st Judicial Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, State of Missouri, in connection with a Foreign Country Money Judgment entered by the Magistrate Court of Tel-Aviv-Yaffo in the State of Israel in favor of Performance Revenue, LT for indebtedness in the amount of approximately NIS 653,868.37 (approximately US $168,910.24). The Company has accrued a $169,309 liability related to this indebtedness.

On May 8, 2015, Millennial Media Inc. filed a complaint against the Company in the 21st Judicial Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, State of Missouri, alleging indebtedness related to goods, wares merchandise and services sold by Millennial Media, Inc. to the Company and seeks damages in the amount of $394,858.38. The Company has accrued a $394,858 liability related to this indebtedness.

On May 18, 2015, Yahoo! Inc. filed a complaint against the Company in 22nd Judicial Circuit Court of City of St. Louis County, Missouri alleging indebtedness in relation to a services contract and seeks damages in the amount of $29,999.95, together with annual interest at the rate of 9% beginning on June 1, 2014 and related court costs. The Company has accrued a $39,339 liability related to this indebtedness.

Leases

On June 30, 2014, the Company executed a lease for 13,268 square feet of office space in St. Louis, Missouri (effective as of July 5, 2014) under an operating lease that expires in 2021. ~~Minimum future rental payments under the lease are as follows:~~

Year Ending December 31,	$
2015		260,783
2016		417,279
2017		417,279
2018		417,279
2019		447,430
Thereafter		571,851
	$	2,531,901

The Company subsequently vacated the property and during the three months ended June 30, 2015 came to a mutual agreement to pay the landlord $49,000 to settle the terms of the lease. This amount is included in our Statement of Operations and accrued expenses on our balance sheet as of June 30, 2015.

The lease was in default as of March 31, 2015 and is also in default as of the date of this filing. The lease provides for no renewal option. Rent expense for the three months ended March 31, 2015, the three months ended March 31, 2014 was $63,780 and $0, respectively.

Financial Advisory Services

On March 20, 2015, the Company executed an engagement letter with Halcyon Cabot Partners, Ltd. to provide financial advisory and investment banking services for the Company through May 31, 2015 and, pursuant to which, the Company paid Halcyon a $13,500 fee upon execution of the engagement letter and an aggregate 275,000 shares of ~~common~~Common ~~stock~~Stock. 150,000 shares of ~~which,~~Common ~~150~~Stock with a value of $60,000 ~~shares~~ were ~~due~~issued upon execution of the engagement letter and the remaining 125,000 shares ~~due~~of byCommon Stock with a value of $37,500 were issued on May 31, 2015.

Note 9 - Term Sheet for Acquisition of Assets

On January 19, 2015, the Company and Network Foundation Technologies, LLC a private California limited liability company (“NIFTY”), entered into a binding term sheet (the “Term Sheet”) pursuant to which the Company and NIFTY agreed to negotiate toward the execution of definitive transaction agreements whereby the Company will acquire certain assets of NIFTY (the “Acquisition”), including sixteen (16) U.S. patents, of which two are pending patent approval, registered trademarks, registered domains and certain physical assets.

As set forth in the Term Sheet, the Company will issue to NIFTY Series B Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred Stock”) convertible into 29% of the Company’s outstanding shares as of closing. The Series B Preferred Stock shall have a conversion price of $0.45 and allow NIFTY to vote on an as converted basis. In addition, NIFTY would be able to appoint two directors to the Company’s Board of Directors. Also pursuant to the Term Sheet, the Company agreed to pay to shareholders who hold the Company’s common stock prior to the acquisition an amount equal to ten percent (10%) of the net proceeds obtained from any patent litigation or patent licensing after the deduction of all related legal fees, costs and expenses, which shall be paid within 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2015. The Company will also assume $600,000 of NIFTY’s liabilities as well as issue 2,000,000 shares of common stock to NIFTY for remaining liabilities. The Acquisition is subject to the performance of certain conditions including approval by the Board of Directors of the Company and NIFTY.

STATIONDIGITAL CORPORATION

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

On April 30, 2015, the Company terminated the Acquisition pursuant to the Term Sheet; therefore, this Term Sheet with NIFTY will have no financial impact on the Company.

The foregoing description of the Term Sheet does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the Term Sheet, which was filed as exhibit 10.12 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Note 10 - Subsequent Events

InOn ~~preparing~~July ~~these~~24, ~~financial~~2015 ~~statements,~~ the Company ~~has~~executed ~~evaluated~~an ~~events~~agreement to borrow an additional $57,500. The note accrues interest at an annual rate of 10% and ~~transactions~~will ~~for~~be ~~potential~~repaid ~~recognition~~in oreither ~~disclosure~~three ~~through~~equal ~~June~~monthly 5,installments ~~2015,~~beginning 180 days after the closing date or in shares of Common Stock. The form of the ~~financial statements~~repayment ~~were~~is ~~issued~~at the Company’s option.

Convertible Promissory Notes

On May 1, 2015, the Company was indebted to the Company's Chief Operating Officer in the amount of $332,854 and, on this date, the Company executed a convertible promissory note for this amount. The note accrues interest at the rate of 15%, was due on June 1, 2015 which was subsequently extended to July 31, 2015 and is convertible at the holder's option into like securities of the Company's next offering at the lesser of a 30% discount to such offering price or $0.45 per share. The note is secured by a security interest in the Company’s assets, and is subordinate to the security interest pledged to Steel Pier Capital Advisors, LLC. The Company will evaluate the terms of the convertible note under FASB ASC 815 to determine if the convertible note requires derivative accounting treatment.

On May 1, 2015, the Company borrowed $30,000 under a convertible senior secured note. The note accrues interest at the rate of 15%, is due on February 2, 2016 and is convertible at the holder's option into like securities of the Company's next offering at the lesser of a 30% discount to such offering price or $0.45 per share. The note is secured by a security interest in all of the Company's assets. In connection with the issuance of the note, the Company also issued warrants to the Holder to purchase 60,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price equal to the lesser of 70% of the price of the common stock in the subsequent offering or $0.45 per share, which warrant shall expire five years after the date of issuance. The Company will evaluate the terms of the convertible note and warrants under FASB ASC 815 to determine if the convertible note and warrants require derivative accounting treatment.

On May 4, 2015, the Company borrowed $10,000 under a convertible senior secured note. The note accrues interest at the rate of 15%, is due on February 5, 2016 and is convertible at the holder's option into like securities of the Company's next offering at the lesser of a 30% discount to such offering price or $0.45 per share. The note is secured by a security interest in all of the Company's assets. In connection with the issuance of the note, the Company also issued warrants to the Holder to purchase 20,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price equal to the lesser of 70% of the price of the common stock in the subsequent offering or $0.45 per share, which warrant shall expire five years after the date of issuance. The Company will evaluate the terms of the convertible note and warrants under FASB ASC 815 to determine if the convertible note and warrants require derivative accounting treatment.

On May 14, 2015, the Company borrowed $75,000 under a convertible senior secured note. The note accrues interest at the rate of 15%, is due on February 15, 2016 and is convertible at the holder's option into like securities of the Company's next offering at the lesser of a 30% discount to such offering price or $0.45 per share. The note is secured by a security interest in all of the Company's assets. In connection with the issuance of the note, the Company also issued warrants to the Holder to purchase 150,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price equal to the lesser of 70% of the price of the common stock in the subsequent offering or $0.45 per share, which warrant shall expire five years after the date of issuance. The Company will evaluate the terms of the convertible note and warrants under FASB ASC 815 to determine if the convertible note and warrants require derivative accounting treatment.

STATIONDIGITAL CORPORATION

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Defaults on Convertible Promissory Notes

On August 26, 2014, the Company borrowed $25,000 under a convertible senior secured note that is currently in default as the maturity date was May 26, 2015; although, no demand for payment has been made by the note holder and the Company is attempting to contact the note holder to get an extension of the maturity date. The note accrues interest at the rate of 12% and is convertible at the holder's option into like securities of the Company's next offering at the lesser of a 30% discount to such offering price or $0.45 per share. The note is secured by a security interest in all of the Company's assets. In connection with the issuance of the note, the Company also issued warrants to the Holder to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price equal to the lesser of 70% of the price of the common stock in the subsequent offering or $0.45 per share, which warrant shall expire five years after the date of issuance. On November 7, 2014, the note was amended such that the interest rate of the 12% increased to 15%, the term "Qualified Financing" was redefined to mean an equity or convertible equity financing by the Company after the completion of the Notes and the warrants were amended increasing the number of warrants from 25,000 shares to 50,000 shares. The Company evaluated the terms of the convertible note and warrants under FASB ASC 815 and determined that the convertible note and warrants require derivative accounting treatment which resulted in recognizing a discount of $25,000 on the note which is being amortized over the life of the note and derivative liability in the amount of $30,783 as of March 31, 2015.

On August 26, 2014, the Company borrowed $25,000 under a convertible senior secured note that is currently in default as the maturity date was May 26, 2015; although, no demand for payment has been made by the note holder and the Company is attempting to contact the note holder to get an extension of the maturity date. The note accrues interest at the rate of 12%, and is convertible at the holder's option into like securities of the Company's next offering at the lesser of a 30% discount to such offering price or $0.45 per share. The note is secured by a security interest in all of the Company's assets. In connection with the issuance of the note, the Company also issued warrants to the Holder to purchase 25,000 shares of the Company's common stock at an exercise price equal to the lesser of 70% of the price of the common stock in the subsequent offering or $0.45 per share, which warrant shall expire five years after the date of issuance. On November 7, 2014, the note was amended such that the interest rate of the 12% increased to 15%, the term "Qualified Financing" was redefined to mean an equity or convertible equity financing by the Company after the completion of the Notes and the warrants were amended increasing the number of warrants from 25,000 shares to 50,000 shares. The Company evaluated the terms of the convertible note and warrants under FASB ASC 815 and determined that the convertible note and warrants require derivative accounting treatment which resulted in recognizing a discount of $25,000 on the note which is being amortized over the life of the note and derivative liability in the amount of $30,783 as of March 31, 2015.

Promissory Notes

On April 7, 2015, the Company borrowed $20,000 under a promissory note. The note accrues interest at the rate of 1% and was originally due on April 13, 2015; on May 28, 2015, the maturity date was extended to July 15, 2015.

On May 1, 2015, the Company borrowed $12,500 under a promissory note. The note was originally due on May 8, 2015; on May 28, 2015, the maturity date was extended to July 15, 2015.

STATIONDIGITAL CORPORATION

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Stock Issued for Services

On April 30, 2015, the Company issued 10,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to a consultant having a fair value of $3,600 ($0.36 per share).

On April 30, 2015, the Company issued 55,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to a consultant having a fair value of $19,800 ($0.36 per share).

On April 30, 2015, the Company issued 10,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to a consultant having a fair value of $3,600 ($0.36 per share).

On April 30, 2015, the Company issued 50,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to a consultant having a fair value of $18,000 ($0.36 per share).

On April 30, 2015, the Company issued 5,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to a consultant having a fair value of $18,000 ($0.36 per share).

On April 30, 2015, the Company issued 10,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to a consultant having a fair value of $3,600 ($0.36 per share).

On May 1, 2015, the Company issued 10,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to a consultant having a fair value of $3,600 ($0.36 per share).

On May 5, 2015, the Company issued 62,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to a consultant having a fair value of $22,940 ($0.37 per share).

On May 11, 2015, the Company issued 21,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to a consultant having a fair value of $6,720 ($0.32 per share).

On May 13, 2015, the Company issued 325,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer having a fair value of $104,000 ($0.32 per share).

On June 2, 2015, the Company issued 125,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to a consultant having a fair value of $38,750 ($0.31 per share).

STATIONDIGITAL CORPORATION

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Legal Proceedings

On April 15, 2015, Performance Revenue, LT filed a Notice of Filing of Foreign Country Money Judgment against the Company in the 21st Judicial Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, State of Missouri, in connection with a Foreign Country Money Judgment entered by the Magistrate Court of Tel-Aviv-Yaffo in the State of Israel in favor of Performance Revenue, LT for indebtedness in the amount of approximately NIS 653,868 (approximately US $168,910). The Company has accrued a $169,309 liability related to this indebtedness.

On May 8, 2015, Millennial Media Inc. filed a complaint against the Company in the 21st Judicial Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, State of Missouri, alleging indebtedness related to goods, wares merchandise and services sold by Millennial Media, Inc. to the Company and seeks damages in the amount of $394,858. The Company has accrued a $394,858 liability related to this indebtedness.

On May 18, 2015, Yahoo! Inc. filed a complaint against the Company in 22nd Judicial Circuit Court of City of St. Louis County, Missouri alleging indebtedness in relation to a services contract and seeks damages in the amount of $30,000, together with annual interest at the rate of 9% beginning on June 1, 2014 and related court costs. The Company has accrued a $39,339 liability related to this indebtedness.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

CAUTIONARY NOTICE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations includes a number of forward-looking statements that reflect ~~Management~~management's current views with respect to future events and financial performance. You can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as "may," "will," "expect," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate" and "continue," or similar words. Those statements include statements regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of us and members of our management team as well as the assumptions on which such statements are based. Prospective investors are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risk and uncertainties, and that actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements.

Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this report and in our other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Important factors currently known to us could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise forward-looking statements to reflect changed assumptions, the occurrence of unanticipated events or changes in the future operating results over time. We believe that our assumptions are based upon reasonable data derived from and known about our business and operations and the business and operations of the Company. No assurances are made that actual results of operations or the results of our future activities will not differ materially from its assumptions. Factors that could cause differences include, but are not limited to, expected market demand for the Company's services and competition.

Overview

We are a multimedia digital broadcast streaming media company that offers free music streaming for millions of songs. StationDigital features both genre-based and artist-based music discovery stations to suit an endless variety of musical tastes, and a personal recommendation service tofor ~~its~~ more than three million users - all available both online and through ~~its~~our iOS and Android mobile applications (“apps”).

StationDigital is guided by the ambition to be the first free Internet radio platform to evolve into a comprehensive digital media broadcast platform, available on any device, anywhere, anytime. To that end, StationDigital intends to steadily add music videos, movies, television programming, specialty programming and video games to our platform of digital media and entertainment which will be available to our users at all times. We ~~intend~~anticipate that our Listener Rewards Program towill extend to each additional digital media offering on the StationDigital platform.

Recent Developments

On April 30, 2015, the Company terminated the Acquisition pursuant to the Term Sheet.

Results of Operations

Comparison of Three Months Ended ~~March~~ 31June 30, 2015 and 2014

Revenue

We generate advertising revenue primarily from audio, display and video advertising sold on a cost-per-thousand impressions, or CPM, basis. Advertisers generally pay us based on the number of delivered impressions. We have arrangements with advertising agencies under which these agencies sell advertising inventory on our service directly to advertisers; we report revenue net of amounts due to agencies. For the three ~~months~~June ~~ended March 31~~30, 2015 and 2014, advertising revenue accounted for ~~85% and~~ 100%, of our total revenue, respectively. We expect that advertising will comprise a substantial majority of revenue for the foreseeable future.

For the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2015 and ~~the~~June ~~three months ended March 31~~30, 2014, the Company generated advertising revenue of $~~704~~0 and $1639,~~507~~054, respectively. The decrease in revenue was due to a reduction in sales and marketing efforts as the Company did not release ~~version~~Version 2 of its web and client software platform (“Version 2”) until ~~March~~April 201, 2015. As Version 1 Music Platform (“Vresion 1”) was discontinued during the first quarter of 2015, there was a period that no application was available to our users and no revenue was generated. Version 2 is not currently in a position to generate revenue.

Cost of Revenue

Cost of revenue generally consists of content acquisition, metadata, royalties and hosting costs.

For the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2015 and ~~the~~June ~~three months ended March 31~~30, 2014, the Company incurred cost of revenue of $4643,~~439~~548 and $~~212~~248,~~932~~207, respectively. The decrease in cost of revenue was primarily attributable to a reduction of metadata costs and the release of Version 2 software which is cost effective to operate compared to Version 1 software which we discontinued.

Operating Expenses

For the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2015 and ~~the~~June ~~three months ended March 31~~30, 2014, the Company incurred operating expenses in the amount of $1932,~~400,791~~519 and $13,~~224~~616,~~603~~638, respectively. These operating expenses were comprised of product development costs, advertising, marketing, compensation, office and general expenses. General and administrative expenses increased from $196,923 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 to $960,189 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 due to increased professional fees and compensation costs, which includes compensation in the form of stock. Sales and marketing decreased from $938,432 for the three months ended March 31, 2014 to $238,566 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 due to a reduction in marketing efforts as the Company did not release version 2 of its platform until March 20, 2015.

Sales and marketing as a sub-group decreased from $2,382,129 for the three months ended June 30, 2014 to 8,543 for the three months ended June 30, 2015 due to the reduction of advertising expenses and the write off of customer reward points that were accrued and determined to have no redeemable value. The reduction in advertising costs was due to the lack of capital to fund advertising campaigns in 2015.

Product development expenses as a sub-group decreased from $406,408 for the three months ended June 30, 2014 to $144,358 for the three months ended June 30, 2015 due to the buildout and updating costs of Version 1 being included in the first three months of 2014. No work was done on Version 1 in 2015. In addition, Version 2 buildout costs incurred during the first three months of 2015 were not incurred during the same period of 2014. The buildout costs for Version 2 were less than the buildout costs for Version 1.

Other Expenses

For the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2015 and ~~the~~June ~~three months ended March 31~~30, 2014, the Company realized net other expense of $~~712~~311,~~187~~812 and $015,658, respectively. The increase in the other expenses ~~during~~is attributable to the ~~three~~net ~~months~~effect ~~ended~~of ~~March~~the ~~31,~~gain ~~2015~~on isthe ~~attributable~~change toin derivatives, offset by the ~~expenses~~increase ~~associated~~in ~~with~~interest ~~derivative~~expense ~~liabilities corresponding~~related to ~~convertible~~the various notes, and ~~warrants~~the ~~executed~~impairment ~~after~~losses. ~~the~~The ~~three~~recording ~~months~~of ~~ended~~the ~~March~~impairment 31losses for property, ~~2014~~website development costs and trademarks became necessary when management determined that its lack of operations gave rise to the asset no longer having any value.

Net Loss

The Company incurred a net loss of $21,~~158~~287,~~713~~879 for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2015, compared with a net loss of $13,~~421~~841,~~028~~449 for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2014. This ~~increase~~decrease in the net loss ~~from~~is ~~the~~due ~~three~~to ~~months~~a ~~ended~~decrease ~~March~~in 31advertising costs, ~~2014~~a togain on the ~~three months~~change ~~ended~~in ~~March~~the ~~31,~~fair ~~2015~~value ~~was~~of ~~primarily~~the ~~due~~notes topayable ~~increased~~derivatives, ~~general~~offset ~~and~~by ~~administrative~~the ~~expenses~~increase ~~and~~in ~~increased~~interest ~~other~~expense ~~expenses~~associated with the notes payable.

~~Liquidity~~Comparison ~~and~~of ~~Capital~~Six ~~Resources~~Months Ended June 30, 2015 and 2014

As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had $39,538 and $8,325, respectively, of cash and cash equivalents. Our current cash holdings will not satisfy our liquidity requirements and we will require additional financing to pursue our planned business activities. Revenue

InFor ~~order to continue operations and engage in~~ the ~~development~~six ofmonths ~~our~~ended ~~company,~~June ~~we will be dependent on raising capital~~30, ~~debt~~2015 orand ~~equity,~~June ~~from outside sources. Such capital may not be available on terms acceptable to us if at all. If credit financing became available~~30, ~~because~~ 2014, the Company isgenerated aadvertising ~~development stage company with minimal~~ revenue toof ~~date,~~$704 ~~it would likely have to pay additional costs associated with high risk loans~~ and ~~be subject to an above market interest rate. We may also incur substantial costs in pursuing such capital financing~~$55, ~~including legal fees~~561, ~~accounting fees, securities law compliance fees and other costs~~respectively. WeThe ~~may~~decrease ~~also~~in berevenue ~~required~~was due to ~~recognize~~a ~~non-cash expenses~~reduction in ~~connection~~sales ~~with~~and ~~certain~~marketing ~~securities~~efforts ~~we may issue, such~~ as ~~convertible notes and warrants, which may adversely impact our financial condition. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain sufficient funds on terms acceptable to us or at all. If~~ the Company ~~cannot~~did ~~obtain~~not ~~the~~release ~~necessary~~Version ~~financing,~~2 ~~the~~of ~~Company~~its ~~would~~web beand ~~required~~client tosoftware ~~limit~~platform ~~our~~until ~~activities~~April or1, ~~cease business operations. As a result~~2015, ~~investors~~which into ~~the~~date ~~Company~~has ~~common~~not ~~stock~~generated ~~would lose all of their investment~~revenue.

~~The~~Cost ~~continuation~~ of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its lenders, the ability of the Company to obtain necessary financing to continue operations and the attainment of profitable operations. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company’s financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. Revenue

~~From~~Cost ~~June~~of ~~30,~~revenue ~~2014~~generally ~~through~~consists ~~January 16, 2015, we completed a private placement offering in which we sold 15% secured convertible notes in an aggregate principal amount~~ of $2content acquisition,~~237,500~~ ~~and warrants to purchase 4~~metadata,~~475,000~~ ~~shares~~royalties ofand ~~common~~hosting ~~stock~~costs.

~~From~~For ~~March~~the 17six months ended June 30, 2015 ~~through~~and ~~May~~June 1430, ~~2015~~2014, we ~~sold~~the ~~15%~~Company ~~secured~~incurred ~~convertible~~cost ~~notes~~of revenue of $89,987 and $461,138, respectively. The decrease in ancost ~~aggregate~~of ~~principal~~revenue ~~amount~~was primarily attributable to a reduction of ~~$615,000~~metadata costs and ~~warrants~~the release of Version 2 software which is cost effective to ~~purchase~~operate compared to Version 1~~,230,000~~ ~~shares~~software ~~of common~~which ~~stock~~we discontinued.

~~Cash Flows Provided By (Used In)~~ Operating ~~Activities~~ Expenses

~~Cash used~~For ~~in operating activities in~~ the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2015 ~~was~~and ~~$678~~June 30,~~789,~~ ~~compared to $466~~2014,~~888~~ ~~cash~~the ~~provided~~Company byincurred operating ~~activities~~expenses in the ~~three months~~amount ~~ended~~of ~~March~~$2,319,810 31and $4,783,063, ~~2014~~respectively. ~~The~~ ~~increase~~These ~~in cash used by~~ operating ~~activities~~expenses ~~was~~were ~~primarily~~comprised ~~a result~~ of anproduct ~~increase in~~development ~~the~~costs, ~~net~~advertising, ~~loss~~marketing, ~~as well as~~compensation, aoffice ~~less~~and ~~significant~~general ~~increase in accounts payable~~expenses.

Sales and marketing as a sub-group decreased from $3,327,561 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 to $127,300 for the six months ended June 30, 2015 due to the reduction of advertising expenses. This reduction was due to the lack of capital to fund advertising campaigns in 2015.

Product development expenses as a sub-group decreased from $495,957 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 to $380,087 for the six months ended June 30, 2015 due to the buildout and updating of Version 1 costs incurred during the first six months of 2014. No work was done on Version 1 in 2015. In addition, there were Version 2 buildout costs during the six months ended June 30, 2015 that were not in the same period of 2014. The buildout costs for Version 2 were less than the buildout costs for Version 1.

General and Administrative expenses as a sub-group increased from $959,545 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 to $1,812,023 for the six months ended June 30, 2015 due to the increase in consulting service fees, finance fees, legal and professional fees and rent for the office space in St. Louis.

Other Expenses

For the six months ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, the Company realized net other expense of $1,023,999 and $15,658, respectively. The increase in the other expenses is attributable to the net effect of the gain on the change in derivatives, offset by the increase in interest expense related to the various notes, and the impairment losses. The recording of the impairment losses for property, website development costs, and trademarks became necessary when management determined that its lack of operations gave rise to the asset no longer having any value.

Net Loss

The Company incurred a net loss of $3,433,092 for the six months ended June 30, 2015, compared with a net loss of $5,204,298 for the six months ended June 30, 2014. This decrease in the net loss is due to a decrease in advertising costs, a gain on the change in the fair value of the notes payable derivatives, offset by the increase in interest expense associated with the notes payable.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of June 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, we had $23,601 and $8,325, respectively, of cash. Our current cash holdings will not satisfy our liquidity requirements and we will require additional financing to pursue our planned business activities.

In order to continue operations and development, we will be dependent on raising capital, debt or equity, from outside sources. Such capital may not be available on terms acceptable to us, if at all. If credit financing becomes available, we would likely have to pay additional costs associated with high risk loans and may be subject to an above market interest rate. We may also incur substantial costs in pursuing such capital financing, including legal fees, accounting fees, securities law compliance fees and other costs. We may also be required to recognize non-cash expenses in connection with certain securities we may issue, such as convertible notes and warrants, which may adversely impact our financial condition. There is no assurance that we will be able to obtain sufficient funds on terms acceptable to us, or at all. If we cannot obtain the necessary financing, we would be required to limit our activities or cease business operations. As a result, investors who have invested in our common stock would lose all of their investment.

Our continuation as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from our lenders and investors, our ability to obtain necessary financing to continue operations and the attainment of profitable operations. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.

From January 1, 2015 to June 30, 2015 we have obtained various notes totaling $1,434,533 and issued warrants to purchase 1,330,000 shares of common stock to continue to provide the operating capital necessary to sustain the business until additional financing is obtained. $50,000 of these notes were repaid during the six months ended June 30, 2015.

Cash Flows Used In Operating Activities

Cash used in operating activities in the six months ended June 30, 2015 was $958,127, compared to $1,021,373 in the six months ended June 30, 2014. The increase in cash used by operating activities was primarily the result of the timing of ordinary business operating activities and the decrease in the size of the business.

Cash Flows Used In Investing Activities

~~Net cash~~ Cash used in investing activities ~~for~~ in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2015 was $343,~~679~~ 680, compared to $~~6,716 for~~0 in the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2014;. ~~the~~ The increase isin ~~primarily~~cash ~~attributable~~used toby anoperating ~~increase~~activities inwas the result of payments for website development ~~fees~~costs and the trademark application.

Cash Flows ~~from~~Provided by Financing Activities

Cash provided by financing activities for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2015 was $1,~~053~~317,~~681~~083 compared to ~~net cash used of~~ $~~454~~1,~~114~~265,632 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2014. The increase in the net cash provided by financing activities ~~for the three months ended March 31, 2015 from the three months ended March 31, 2014~~ was primarily athe result of ~~an increase in~~ the ~~furtherance~~proceeds offrom ~~convertible~~promissory ~~notes~~ and ~~other~~convertible ~~promissory~~ notes.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off balance sheet arrangements.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks.

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), are recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's (“SEC’s”) rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") and our Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"), the Company's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, of the design and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this report. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In addition, the design of disclosure controls and procedures must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and that management is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the benefits of possible controls and procedures relative to their costs.

Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2015, our disclosure controls and procedures are not designed at a reasonable assurance level and are not effective to provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, validated, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. The conclusion was due to the presence of the following material weaknesses in disclosure controls and procedures due to our small size and limited resources: (i) inadequate segregation of duties and effective risk assessment; (ii) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of both U.S. ~~GAAP~~generally accepted accounting principles and SEC Guidelines; (iii) inadequate security and restricted access to computer systems including insufficient disaster recovery plans; and (iv) no written whistleblower policy.

Our CEO and CFO plan to implement appropriate disclosure controls and procedures to remediate these material weaknesses, including (i) appointing additional qualified personnel to address inadequate segregation of duties and ineffective risk management; (ii) adopt sufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting and a whistle blower policy; and (iii) implement sufficient security and restricted access measures regarding our computer systems and implement a disaster recovery plan.

Changes in Internal Controls over Financial Reporting

During the fiscal quarter ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2015, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

~~Management~~Subsequent to the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2015, the CFO resigned from his position as Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer effective as of the same date. The Company intends to conduct a search for a new Chief Financial Officer/ Principal Accounting Officer. Edward Storm, the Company’s ~~report on~~Chief ~~internal~~Operating ~~control~~Officer, ~~over~~will ~~financial~~assume ~~reporting~~the role of interim Chief Financial Officer/ Principal Accounting Officer until a new Chief Financial Officer/ Principal Accounting Officer is appointed.

~~Our~~The ~~management~~departure isof ~~responsible for~~the ~~establishing~~CFO ~~and~~could ~~maintaining~~result ~~adequate~~in a material weakness in internal ~~control~~controls over financial reporting, aswith ~~defined~~respect into ~~Exchange~~segregation ~~Act~~of ~~Rule 13a-15(f)~~duties. ~~Management~~ ~~conducted~~The anCompany ~~evaluation~~is ofin the ~~effectiveness~~process of ~~our~~remediating ~~internal~~this ~~control~~potential ~~over~~material ~~financial~~weakness, ~~reporting~~however ~~based~~since ona ~~the~~remediation ~~framework in~~is ~~Internal~~not ~~Control~~currently –in ~~Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation~~place, management has concluded that ~~our~~a material weakness in internal ~~control~~controls over financial reporting ~~was~~exists ~~not~~at ~~effective~~this ~~as of March 31, 2015~~time.

2728

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

Other than the following, we are not a party to any pending legal proceeding, nor is our property the subject of a pending legal proceeding, that is not in the ordinary course of business or otherwise material to the financial condition of our business:

On September 8, 2014, Andrew Gladney filed a complaint against the Company and a co-defendant, ~~CloudWebStore~~CloudWeb Store, Inc. in the 21st Judicial Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, State of Missouri, alleging that the Company and ~~CloudWebStore~~CloudWeb failed to compensate him for the services rendered pursuant to a consulting agreement and related correspondence. ~~Mr. Gladney is seeking damages in excess of $25,000 and 5 million shares of common stock. The Company intends to vigorously defend its interests.~~

On April 15, 2015, Performance Revenue, LT filed a Notice of Filing of Foreign Country Money Judgment against the Company in the 21st Judicial Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, State of Missouri, in connection with a Foreign Country Money Judgment entered by the Magistrate Court of Tel-Aviv-Yaffo in the State of Israel in favor of Performance Revenue, LT ~~for indebtedness in the amount of approximately NIS 653,868 (approximately US $168,910)~~. ~~The Company has accrued a $169,309 liability related to this indebtedness.~~

On May 8, 2015, Millennial Media Inc. filed a complaint against the Company in the 21st Judicial Circuit Court of the County of St. Louis, State of Missouri, alleging indebtedness related to goods, wares merchandise and services sold by Millennial Media, Inc. to the Company ~~and seeks damages in the amount of $394,858~~. ~~The Company has accrued a $394,858 liability related to this indebtedness.~~

On May 18, 2015, Yahoo! Inc. filed a complaint against the Company in 22nd Judicial Circuit Court of City of St. Louis County, Missouri alleging indebtedness in relation to a services contract ~~and seeks damages in the amount of $30,000, together with annual interest at the rate of 9% beginning on June 1, 2014 and related court costs~~. ~~The Company has accrued a $39,339 liability related to this indebtedness.~~

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

Stock Issued for Services

OnIn ~~January~~the ~~15,~~first quarter of 2015, the Company issued and accrued 15 550,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to aconsultants ~~consultant~~ having a fair value of $6195,000 ~~($0~~.~~40 per share).~~

OnIn ~~February~~the 2,second quarter of 2015, the Company issued ~~150~~ or accrued 1,483,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to a consultant having a fair value of $52465,~~500 ($0~~860.35 ~~per~~This ~~share)~~is inclusive of 325,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to the Company’s Chief Financial Officer having a fair value of $113,750.

On February 5, 2015, the Company issued 250,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to a consultant having a fair value of $82,500 ($0.33 per share).

On February 15, 2015, the Company accrued 15,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to a consultant having a fair value of $6,000 ($0.40 per share).

On March 5, 2015, the Company accrued 25,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to a consultant having a fair value of $9,750 ($0.39 per share).

On March 15, 2015, the Company accrued 15,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to a consultant having a fair value of $5,850 ($0.39 per share).

On March 20, 2015, the Company accrued 50,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to a consultant having a fair value of $20,000 ($0.40 per share).

On March 20, 2015, the Company issued 50,000 shares of restricted common stock for services to a consultant having a fair value of $20,000 ($0.40 per share).

Filing Compare · STATIONDIGITAL CORP