UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2012
Or
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from: _____________ to _____________

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2012

Or

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from: _____________ to _____________

Commission File Number: 333-147629

MAJIC WHEELS CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware		98-0533882
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1950 Custom Drive

Fort Myers, FL 33907

(Address of Principal Executive Office) (Zip Code)

239-313-5672

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
			þ	Yes	o	No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
			o	Yes	o	No
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer			o
Non-accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company			þ
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
			o	Yes	þ	No
As of August 17, 2012, 371,441,575 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, were outstanding.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

1Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submitand post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.

Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company	x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

As of November 19, 2012, 651,991,821 shares of common stock, par value $0.0001 per share, were outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I
Item 1	Financial Statements		3
Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation		1518
Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		1821
Item 4(T)	Controls and Procedures		1821
PART II
Item 1	Legal Proceedings		1922
Item 1A	Risk Factors		1922
Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		1922
Item 3	Defaults Upon Senior Securities		1922
Item 4	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders		1922
Item 5	Other Information		1922
Item 6	Exhibits		2023
SIGNATURES			2124

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Consolidated Financial Statements

Majic Wheels Corp Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	Successor			Predecessor
ASSETS	9/30/12			12/31/11

Current Assets
Cash	$	8,305		$	725
Accounts receivable, net		52,986			31,558
Due from related parties		14,203			-
Total Current Assets		75,494			32,283

Restricted Cash		-			15,034
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $115,478 and $443,734, respectively		853,174			484,208
Total Assets	$	928,668		$	531,525

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT

Current Liabilities
Bank overdraft	$	847		$	-
Accounts payable		30,778			12,584
Accrued liabilities		1,234,406			662,879
Deferred Revenue		-			37,535
Loans payable, current		359,468			1,096,140
Convertible debt, current, net of unamortized discount of $83,270 and $0, respectively		28,512			-
Derivative liability		2,873,501			-
Capital leases payable, current		-			30,582
Total Current Liabilities		4,527,512			1,839,720

Promissory notes		49,636			11,365
Convertible debt, net of unamortized discount of $919,324 and $0 respectively		108,918			-
Total Liabilities		4,686,066			1,851,085

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Preferred stock, $.0001 per share, 10,000,000 shares authorized; 500,000 shares issued and outstanding		50			-
Common stock, $.0001 per share, 5,000,000,000 shares authorized; 516,062,628 shares issued and outstanding		51,606			-
Additional paid-in-capital		753,184			15,629
Accumulated deficit		(4,562,238	)		(1,335,189	)
Total Shareholders' Deficit		(3,757,398	)		(1,319,560	)

Total Liabilities & Shareholders’ Deficit	$	928,668		$	531,525

(Unaudited)

	Successor			Predecessor
ASSETS	6/30/12			12/31/11
Current Assets
Cash	$	15,617		$	725
Accounts receivable, net		45,907			31,558
Total Current Assets		61,524			32,283
Restricted Cash		-			15,034
Property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation of $73,092 and $443,734, respectively		895,560			484,208
Total Assets	$	957,084		$	531,525
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current Liabilities
Bank overdraft	$	395		$	-
Accounts payable		12,901			12,584
Accrued liabilities		1,259,194			662,879
Deferred Revenue		-			37,535
Loans payable, current		360,145			1,096,140
Related party loans payable, current		2,870			-
Convertible debt, current, net of unamortized discount of $77,524		1,076			-
Derivative liabilities		2,154,479			-
Capital leases payable, current		-			30,582
Total Current Liabilities		3,791,060			1,839,720
Promissory notes		969,324			11,365
Convertible debt, net of unamortized discount of $75,821		55,134			-
Total Liabilities		4,815,518			1,851,085
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Preferred stock, $.0001 per share, 10,000,000 shares authorized; 0 shares issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $.0001 per share, 5,000,000,000 shares authorized; 217,621,147 shares issued and outstanding		21,762			-
Additional paid-in-capital		319,366			15,629
Accumulated deficit		(4,199,562	)		(1,335,189	)
Total Shareholders' Deficit		(3,858,434	)		(1,319,560	)
Total Liabilities & Shareholders’ Deficit	$	957,084		$	531,525

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements.

Majic Wheels Corp Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

(Unaudited)

	Successor			Predecessor			Predecessor			Successor			Predecessor
	June 1, 2012			June 1, 2011			January 1, 2012			March 1, 2012			January 1, 2011
	through			through			through			through			Through
	September 30, 2012			September 30, 2011			February 29, 2012			September. 30, 2012			September. 30, 2011
Service revenues		217,128		$	139,344		$	82,945		$	516,057		$	423,223

Operating Expenses:
Cost of services		128,130			56,703			34,768			244,967			191,028
Salaries & Benefits		266,251			40,821			19,737			492,698			112,543
Professional fees		7,530			11,491			20			48,284			15,991
Depreciation expense		42,386			36,337			24,224			115,478			109,010
Loss on disposal of equipment					-									2,007
Other selling, general and administrative expenses		92,381			56,243			27,880			310,690			155,567
Total operating expenses		536,678			201,595			106,629			1,212,117			586,146

Loss from operations		(319,550	)		(62,251	)		(23,684	)		(696,060	)		(162,923	)

Other Income (Expenses)
Interest expense, net		(182,945	)		(46,337	)		-			(295,624	)		(135,476	)
Loss on disposal of equipment		-			-			-			-			-
Gain (loss) on derivative liability		139,819			-			-			(387,438	)		-
Total other income (expenses), net		(43,216	)		(46,337	)		-			(683,062	)		(135,476	)

Net Loss	$	(362,676	)	$	(108,588	)	$	(23,684	)	$	(1,379,122	)	$	(298,399	)

Net Loss per Share (Basic and Diluted):		(0.00	)								(0.01	)
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding (Basic and Diluted)		359,693,526			-			-			269,107,910			-

	Successor		Predecessor		Predecessor		Successor		Predecessor
	April 1, 2012		April 1, 2011		January 1, 2012		March 1, 2012		January 1, 2011
	through		through		through		through		through
	June 30, 2012		June 30, 2011		February 29, 2012		June 30, 2012		June 30, 2011
Service revenues	$	265,704	$	150,417	$	82,945	$	298,929	$	283,879
Operating Expenses:
Cost of services		101,998		60,179		34,768		116,837		134,325
Salaries & Benefits		176,108		36,865		19,737		226,447		71,722
Professional fees		33,454		3,300		20		40,754		4,500
Depreciation expense		62,857		36,336		24,224		73,092		72,673
Loss on disposal of equipment		-		-		-		-		2,007
Selling, general and administrative expenses		109,139		54,487		27,880		218,309		99,324
Total operating expenses		483,556		191,167		106,629		675,439		384,551
Loss from operations		(217,852		(40,750		(23,684		(376,510		(100,672
Other Expenses
Interest expense		(82,343		(45,010		-		(112,679		(89,139
Loss on derivative liability		(634,079		-		-		(527,257		-
Total other expenses, net		(716,422		(45,010		-		(639,936		(89,139
Net Loss	$	(934,274	$	(85,760	$	(23,684	$	(1,016,446	$	(189,811
Net Loss per Share (Basic and Diluted):		(0.00		-		-		(0.01		-
Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding (Basic and Diluted)		203,083,005		-		-		200,797,446		-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements.

Majic Wheels Corp Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow (Unaudited)

	Predecessor			Successor			Predecessor
	January 1, 2012			March 1, 2012			January 1, 2011
	through			through			through
	February 29, 2012			~~June~~September 30, 2012			~~June~~September 30, 2011
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(23,684	)	$	(1,~~016~~379,~~446~~122	)	$	(~~189~~298,~~811~~399	)
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) to net cash (used in) operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation		24,224			73115,~~092~~478			72109,~~673~~010
Loss on disposal of equipment		-			-			2,007
Amortization of debt discount		-			18127,~~992~~696			-
Loss on derivative		-			~~527~~387,~~257~~438			-
Franchise fees		-			75,000			-
Change in assets and liabilities:
Stock based compensation		-			37,100			-
Accounts receivable		(1,854	)		(38,818	)		34,341
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Related party receivable		(5,197	)		-			804
Accounts receivable		(1,854	)		(45,896	)		34,302
Related party receivable		(5,197	)		(14,203	)		-
Prepaid expenses		-			-			663
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(40,621	)		~~321~~616,~~064~~437			98152,~~674~~599
Deferred revenue		14,735			-			(22,799	)
Related party payable		-			(0	)		1,374
Net cash (Used in) Operating Activities		(32,397	)		(39,859	)		(3,448	)
Deferred revenue		14,735			-			(12,893	)
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities		(32,397	)		(80,072	)		(11,337	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of equipment		-			(8,500	)		-
Proceeds from the sale of equipment		-			-			200
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		-			(8,500	)		200
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities		-			(8,500	)		200
Cash flows from financing activities:
Bank overdraft		-			(65,~~050~~598	)		(13,~~732~~612	)
Net proceeds from promissory notes		39,297			72131,~~973~~006			19,~~665~~942
Net proceeds from related party debt		2,700			~~170~~-			-10,612
Repayments of promissory notes		-			(527,~~189~~903	)		-
Repayments of related party debt		-			(2,700	)		-
Repayments of capital lease		-			-			(12,123	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		41,997			61,904			5,810
Cash provided by Financing Activities		41,997			94,805			14,819
Net Increase in Cash		9,600			136,~~545~~233			23,~~562~~682
Cash - Beginning of Period		725			2,072			124
Cash - End of Period		10,325			158,~~617~~305			23,~~686~~806
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest		-			-			363
Income taxes		-			-			-
Non-cash activities
Stock issued for conversion of convertible notes into common stock		-			11,452			-
Common stock issued for conversion of convertible notes		-			40,684			-
Debt issued for purchase of equipment		-			122,633			-
Common stock issued for settlement of accrued compensation		-			93,146			-
Reclassification from derivative liabilities to additional paid-in capital		-			86,353			-
Preferred stock issued for settlement of accrued compensation		-			205,124			-
Reclassification from accrued interests to convertible debt		-			18,562			-
Reclassification from nonconvertible to convertible notes		-			1,011,201			-
Reclassification from accrued interest to convertible notes		-			18,562			-
Debt issued for purchase of fixed assets		-			122,633			-
Debt discount resulting from recognition of derivative		-			1,059,513			-
Settlement of derivative liabilities		-			185,463			-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements.

MAJIC WHEELS CORP.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~JUNE~~SEPTEMBER 30, 2012

UNAUDITED

(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Organization

Majic Wheels Corp. (“Majic Wheels” or the “Company”) is a Delaware corporation. The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on March 15, 2007. The business plan of the Company was to develop a radio-controlled toy vehicle utilizing a patent pertaining to unique adhesive wheels. In July 2010, there was a change in control of the Company and its focus is now waste management. In 2012, the Company started operations in the waste management business through its wholly-owned subsidiary, MW Dumpster Services, Inc. (“MWDS”). In March 2012, the Company purchased the exclusive franchise rights of College Hunks Haul Junk and College Hunks Moving for Charlotte and Lee Counties located in Southwest Florida and created a wholly-owned subsidiary for its operations, CHHJ of Lee and Charlotte County, Inc. The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Majic Wheels Corp. were prepared from the accounts of the Company under the accrual basis of accounting.

On January 25, 2012, the Company filed with the Secretary of the State of Delaware to increase the authorized capital of the Corporation to be 5,000,000,000 shares of common stock plus 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, both with a par value of $0.0001 per share.

Basis of Presentation-Successor

The accompanying unaudited consolidated balance sheet as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012 included herein has been prepared without an audit pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, the interim financial statements include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly the Company’s financial position as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the three and ~~four~~seven months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012. These results are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the calendar year ending December 31, 2012. The accompanying consolidated financial statements and notes thereto do not reflect all disclosures required under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Refer to the Company’s audited financial statements as of December 31, 2011, filed with the SEC for additional information, including significant accounting policies.

Basis of Presentation-Predecessor

The accompanying unaudited balance sheet as of December 31, 2011, the statement of operations and the statement of cash flows for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011 include the accounts of Mark’s Dumpster Services Inc. The accompanying statement of operations and the statement of cash flows for the two months ended February 29, 2012 include the accounts of Mark’s Dumpster Services Inc and MW Dumpster Service Inc. These predecessor financial statements are disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-Q for purposes of complying with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission as required by S-X Rule 8-02. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America using Mark’s Dumpster Services and MW Dumpster Service Inc specific information where available. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with Company’s Form 8-K filed on March 2, 2012.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

Customers generally pay invoices between the time of order to 30 days after the service has commenced. The Company determines its allowance by considering a number of factors, including the length of time trade accounts receivable are past due, the Company’s previous loss history, the specific supplier’s current ability to pay its obligation to the Company and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. At ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the allowance for doubtful accounts was $0 and $18,726, respectively.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment, including significant improvements, are recorded at cost. Repairs and maintenance and any gains or losses on dispositions are recognized as incurred. Depreciation is provided for on a straight-line basis to allocate the cost of depreciable assets to operations over their estimated service lives.

Asset Category		Depreciation Period

Dumpsters		10 Years
Machinery & equipment		5 Years
Trailers		5 Years
Transportation equipment		5 Years
Used vehicles		5 Years

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets and the related estimated remaining lives at each balance sheet date. The Company records an impairment or change in useful life whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable or the useful life has changed. For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012, no events or circumstances occurred for which an evaluation of the recoverability of long-lived assets was required.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification subtopic 605-10, Revenue Recognition (“ASC 605-10”) which requires that four basic criteria must be met before revenue can be recognized: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists; (2) delivery has occurred; (3) the selling price is fixed and determinable; and (4) collectability is reasonably assured. Dumpster rental revenues are recognized at the end of the rental term. Upon pickup of the dumpster, additional charges such as rental fees, may be billed to the customer. The Company provides certain labor services and the revenue for these services is recognized when the service is complete. Advance payments from customer are deferred and revenue is recognized when service is complete. Deferred revenue as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was $0 and $37,535, respectively.

Stock-based compensation

Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 718, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation" established financial accounting and reporting standards for stock-based employee compensation plans. It defines a fair value based method of accounting for an employee stock option or similar equity instrument. The Company accounts for compensation cost for stock option plans and for share based payments to non-employees in accordance with ASC 718. Accordingly, employee share-based payment compensation is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award, and is recognized as an expense over the requisite service period. Additionally, share-based awards to non-employees are expensed over the period in which the related services are rendered at their fair value. The Company accounts for share based payments to non-employees in accordance with ASC 505-50 “Accounting for Equity Instruments Issued to Non-Employees for Acquiring, or in Conjunction with Selling, Goods or Services”.

Embedded conversion features

The Company evaluates embedded conversion features within convertible debt and convertible preferred stock under ASC 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” to determine whether the embedded conversion feature should be bifurcated from the host instrument and accounted for as a derivative at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in earnings. If the conversion feature does not require derivative treatment under ASC 815, the instrument is evaluated under ASC 470-20 “Debt with Conversion and Other Options” for consideration of any beneficial conversion feature.

Fair Value of Measurement

As defined in ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements”, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). The Company utilizes market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable. The Company classifies fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (level 1 measurement) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (level 3 measurement).

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy defined by ASC 820 are as follows:

Level 1 – Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date. Active markets are those in which transactions for the asset or liability occur in sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis. Level 1 primarily consists of financial instruments such as exchange-traded derivatives, marketable securities and listed equities.

Level 2 – Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. Level 2 includes those financial instruments that are valued using models or other valuation methodologies. These models are primarily industry-standard models that consider various assumptions, including quoted forward prices for commodities, time value, volatility factors, and current market and contractual prices for the underlying instruments, as well as other relevant economic measures. Substantially all of these assumptions are observable in the marketplace throughout the full term of the instrument, can be derived from observable data or are supported by observable levels at which transactions are executed in the marketplace. Instruments in this category generally include non-exchange-traded derivatives such as commodity swaps, interest rate swaps, options and collars.~~Level~~ 3 – Pricing inputs include significant inputs that are generally less observable from objective sources. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.

~~The~~Level ~~following~~3 ~~table~~– ~~sets~~Pricing ~~forth~~inputs byinclude ~~level~~significant ~~within~~inputs ~~the fair value hierarchy the Company’s financial assets and liabilities~~ that ~~were~~are ~~accounted~~generally ~~for~~less atobservable ~~fair~~from ~~value~~objective ~~as of June 30, 2012~~sources. AsThese ~~required~~inputs bymay ~~ASC~~be ~~820,~~used ~~financial~~with ~~assets~~internally ~~and~~developed ~~liabilities~~methodologies ~~are~~that ~~classified~~result in ~~their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company~~management’s ~~assessment~~best ofestimate ~~the significance~~ of ~~a particular input to the~~ fair value ~~measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels~~.

As of June 30, 2012

Total

Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments Level 1

Significant Other Observable Inputs Level 2

Significant Unobservable Inputs Level 3

Liabilities:

Derivative liabilities

2,154,479

The following table sets forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value as of September 30, 2012. As required by ASC 820, financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels.

As of September 30, 2012	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Instruments Level 1	Significant Other Observable Inputs Level 2	Significant Unobservable Inputs Level 3
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities	$	2,873,501			$	2,873,501

(2) Development Stage Activities and Going Concern

From the date of inception, March 15, 2007, through the date of the acquisition of assets (see Note 5), the Company was in the development stage as defined in ASC 915, Accounting and Reporting by Development Stage Enterprises”. As a result of the acquisition, the Company has begun to generate revenue from operations and has emerged from the development stage.

While management of the Company believes that it will be successful in its capital formation and planned operating activities, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to raise additional equity capital or that its new business focus of waste management will generate sufficient revenues to sustain the operations of the Company.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has incurred an operating loss since inception, had negative working capital as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012, and the cash resources of the Company were insufficient to meet its planned business objectives. These and other factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

(3) Promissory Notes

In December 2010, the Company issued a promissory note of $62,500 to American Settlement. The note accrues interest at 20% and is payable on demand. In June 2012, American Settlement sold the whole $62,500 debt to Garlette, LLC. The Company then executed an amended and restated convertible debenture agreement to clarify the amount owed. See discussion about the amended convertible debt agreement and debt modification in Note 4.

On January 4, 2012, the Company issued one promissory note of $32,400 as payment for an accounts payable invoice. The note accrues interest at 20%, unsecured and is payable on demand.

On ~~February~~March 29, 2012, the Company ~~issued~~entered ~~one~~into ~~promissory~~a ~~note~~debt ofagreement ~~$837,519~~with toGE ~~Connied,~~Capital. This ~~Inc~~agreement is for ~~acquisition~~the purchase of ~~assets~~equipment. ~~used~~The ~~for~~Company promises to pay the ~~expansion~~Lender ofprincipal ~~its~~$54,475 ~~waste~~plus ~~management~~pre-computed ~~and~~interest ~~site~~for ~~work~~a ~~division~~total ~~(see~~of ~~discussion~~$59,021 in ~~Note~~26 6)monthly installments. The ~~note~~proceeds ~~accrues~~of ~~interest~~the atdebt ~~20%,~~will isbe ~~payable~~disbursed onas ~~February~~follows: $190 ~~28,~~to ~~2014,~~Florida ~~secured~~Department byof ~~the~~Revenue ~~assets~~and ~~that~~$54,285 ~~were~~to ~~purchased~~Apex ~~and~~Equipment itSales, isInc. ~~convertible~~During ~~after~~the ~~six~~nine months atended ~~25%~~September of30, ~~the~~2012, ~~average closing prices for~~ the Company’s ~~stock~~paid ~~during the previous~~ $10,476 ~~trading~~principal ~~days~~to atGE ~~date of conversion~~Capital.

On March 26, 2012, the Company issued a $75,000 promissory note to a third party for the exclusive franchise rights of College Hunks Haul Junk and College Hunks Moving for Charlotte and Lee Counties located in Southwest Florida. The note accrues interest at 3%, is payable in two years, unsecured and is convertible after six months at the lowest closing price for the Company’s stock during the previous 10 trading days at date of conversion. The related cost is recorded as an operating expense during the four months ended June 30, 2012 due to uncertainty of the future expected cash flows to be derived from these rights.

On March 29, 2012, the Company entered into a debt agreement with GE Capital. This agreement is for the purchase of equipment. The Company promises to pay the Lender principal $54,475 plus pre-computed interest for a total of $59,021 in 26 monthly installments. The proceeds of the debt will be disbursed as follows: $190 to Florida Department of Revenue and $54,285 to Apex Equipment Sales, Inc.

On March 30, 2012, the Company issued two promissory notes totaling $30,337 to two third parties as payment for reimbursement of expenses incurred on behalf of the Company. The notes accrue interest at 20%, unsecured and are payable on demand.

On April 4, 2012, the Company entered into another debt agreement with GE Capital. This agreement is additional consideration due for the purchase of the College Hunks franchise as discussed in Note 1. The Company promises to pay the Lender principal of $47,658 plus pre-computed interest for a total of $55,610 in 48 monthly installments. The proceeds of the agreement will be disbursed as follows: $166 to Florida Department of Revenue, $30,216 to GE Capital, and $17,276 to CHHJ of Southwest Florida LLC. This debt agreement includes the purchase of a 2009 Isuzu truck.

On May 29, 2012, the Company entered into a future receivable purchase and sale agreement with a third party. The Company sold future receivables of $11,960 for a price of $8,000. The Company recognized the difference of $3,960 between the value of future receivables and sale price as interest expenses during the 4seven months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the Company paid $11,463 the third party.

On June 30, 2012, the Company issued two promissory notes totaling $15,645 to two third parties as payment for reimbursement of expenses incurred on behalf of the Company. The notes accrue interest at 20%, unsecured and are payable on demand.

On June 30, 2012, the Company issued a promissory note for $18,992 to a third party as payment for reimbursement of expenses incurred on behalf of the Company. This note accrues interest at 20%, is payable in one year, unsecured, and is convertible after six months into common stock at the conversion rate of 25% of the average of the five lowest closing prices during the 30 trading days prior to notice of conversion. As of June 30, 2012, the note is not convertible yet.

~~(4) Convertible~~On ~~Debt~~June 30, 2012, the Company issued two promissory notes totaling $15,645 to two third parties as payment for reimbursement of expenses incurred on behalf of the Company. The notes accrue interest at 20%, unsecured and ~~Debt~~are ~~Modification~~payable on demand.

On July 24, 2012, the Company issued a promissory note of $32,500 to Asher Enterprise, Inc. The note accrues at 8%, is unsecured and due on April 23, 2013, and is convertible after 180 days of the debt issuance into the Company’s restricted common stock. The conversion price is 58% of the average of the three lowest closing bid prices during the 10 trading days prior to notice of conversion. Asher agreed to restrict its ability to convert the note and receive shares of the Company if the number of shares of common stock beneficially held by Asher and its affiliates in the aggregate after such conversion exceeds 4.99% of the then outstanding shares of common stock. As of September 30, 2012, the note is not convertible yet.

On August 22, 2012, American Settlement sold a promissory note of $36,182 to Asher Enterprises, Inc. The note was originally issued by the Company on December 31, 2010, accrued interest at 20% and was payable on demand. The Company then executed an amended and restated convertible debenture agreement with Asher Enterprises, Inc. See discussion in Note 4.

On September 30, 2012, the Company issued three promissory notes totaling $10,597 to three third parties as payment for reimbursement of expenses incurred on behalf of the Company. The notes accrue interest at 20%, unsecured and are payable on demand.

(4) Convertible Debt and Debt Modification

Connied, Inc

InOn ~~May~~February 29, 2012, the Company issued aone promissory note of $20837,~~500~~519 ~~convertible~~to ~~debenture~~ Connied, Inc tofor ~~purchase~~acquisition ~~equipment. The~~of ~~convertible~~assets ~~debenture~~used ~~matures~~for ~~two years from~~ the ~~date~~expansion of ~~issuance~~its waste management and ~~bears~~site work division (see discussion in Note 6). The note accrues interest at a 20%, ~~rate~~is ~~per~~payable ~~annum,~~on isFebruary ~~unsecured~~28, ~~and~~2014, issecured ~~convertible~~by ~~into~~ the ~~Company’s~~assets ~~common~~that ~~stock~~were atpurchased. ~~any~~In ~~time~~August, at2012, after six months of the ~~holder’s~~debt ~~option~~issuance, ~~into~~it ~~common~~became ~~stock~~convertible atand ~~the~~was reclassified from nonconvertible promissory note to convertible note. The conversion ~~rate~~price ofis 25% of the average ofclosing prices for the ~~five~~Company’s ~~lowest~~stock ~~trading~~during ~~days~~the 30previous ~~days~~10 ~~prior~~trading todays ~~notice~~at date of conversion.

~~The~~In ~~Company~~May ~~analyzed~~2012, the ~~conversion~~Company ~~option~~issued ~~for~~a ~~derivative~~$20,500 ~~accounting~~convertible ~~consideration~~debenture ~~under~~Connied, ~~ASC~~Inc ~~815-15~~to ~~“Derivatives~~purchase ~~and~~equipment. The ~~Hedging”~~convertible ~~and~~debenture ~~determined~~matures ~~that~~two ~~the~~years ~~instrument~~from ~~should be classified as liabilities due to there being no explicit limit to~~ the ~~number~~date of ~~shares~~issuance toand bebears ~~delivered~~interest ~~upon~~at ~~settlement~~a of20% ~~the~~rate ~~above~~per ~~conversion~~annum, ~~options.~~is ~~The~~unsecured, ~~instrument~~and is ~~measured~~convertible atinto ~~fair value at~~ the ~~end~~Company’s ofcommon ~~each~~stock ~~reporting~~at ~~period~~any ortime ~~termination~~at of the ~~instrument~~holder’s ~~with~~option, ~~the~~at ~~change in fair value recorded to earnings. The fair value of~~ the ~~embedded~~ conversion ~~option~~rate ~~resulted~~of in25% ~~a full discount to the note on the debt issuance date~~ of ~~$20,500. The discount will be amortized over~~ the ~~term~~average of the ~~note~~five tolowest ~~interest~~closing ~~expense.~~prices Asduring ofthe ~~June~~ 30, ~~2012,~~trading ~~$1,292~~days ofprior ~~the discount had been amortized~~ to ~~interest~~notice ~~expense.~~of ~~See Note 5 for additional information on the derivative liabilities~~conversion.

The Company analyzed the conversion option of both Connied, Inc debts for derivative accounting consideration under ASC 815-15 “Derivatives and Hedging” and determined that the instrument should be classified as liabilities due to there being no explicit limit to the number of shares to be delivered upon settlement of the above conversion options. The instrument is measured at fair value at the end of each reporting period or termination of the instrument with the change in fair value recorded to earnings. The fair value of the embedded conversion options resulted in full discounts of $837,519 and $20,500 to Connied notes issued in February, 2012 and May 2012, respectively. The discounts will be amortized over the term of the notes to interest expense. As of September 30, 2012, $52,780 of the discounts had been amortized to interest expense. See Note 5 for additional information on the derivative liabilities.

Garlette, LLC

In June 2012, as discussed in Note 3, American Settlement sold its $62,500 promissory note plus $18,562 of accrued interest to Garlette, LLC. The Company then executed an amended and restated convertible debenture agreement to clarify the amount owed. The amended and restated convertible debenture has a principal of $81,062, bears interest at a 20% rate per annum, is unsecured, payable on June 26, 2013 and is convertible into the Company’s common stock at any time at the holder’s option, ~~into common stock~~ at the conversion rate of 25% of the average of the five lowest closing prices during the 30 trading days ~~30 days~~ prior to notice of conversion.

The Company analyzed the modification of the term under ASC 470-50 “Debt Modifications and Extinguishment”. The Company determined the debt holder has not granted a concession under the amended terms. As the modification adds a new conversion option to the debt, the Company concluded the modification is substantial and should be accounted as debt extinguishment.

The Company also analyzed the conversion option for derivative accounting consideration under ASC 815-15 “Derivatives and Hedging” and determined that the instrument should be classified as liabilities due to there being no explicit limit to the number of shares to be delivered upon settlement of the above conversion options. The instrument is measured at fair value at the end of each reporting period or termination of the instrument with the change in fair value recorded to earnings. The fair value of the embedded conversion option resulted in a full discount of $81,062 to the note on the debt modification date ~~of $81,062~~. The discount will be amortized over the term of the note to interest expense.

On the debt issuance date, the Company converted the $2,462 convertible note into 9,117,185 common shares. As of ~~June~~September 30, 2012, $123,~~077~~135 of the discount had been amortized to interest expense. See Note 5 for additional information on the derivative liabilities.

10Asher Enterprises, Inc.

On August 22, 2012, as discussed in Note 3, American Settlements sold its $36,182 promissory note to Asher Enterprises, Inc. The Company then executed an amended and restated convertible debenture agreement. The amended and restated convertible debenture bears interest at a 10% rate per annum, is unsecured, payable on demand and is convertible into the Company’s common stock upon the issuance of the debt. The conversion price is 58% of the average of the three lowest closing bid prices of the common stock during the 10 trading days prior to conversion.

The Company also analyzed the conversion option for derivative accounting consideration under ASC 815-15 “Derivatives and Hedging” and determined that the instrument should be classified as liabilities due to there being no explicit limit to the number of shares to be delivered upon settlement of the above conversion options. The instrument is measured at fair value at the end of each reporting period or termination of the instrument with the change in fair value recorded to earnings. The fair value of the embedded conversion option resulted in a full discount of $36,182 to the note on the debt modification date. The discount will be amortized over the term of the note to interest expense.

In August and September 2012, the Company converted a total of $14,000 of the convertible note into 53,421,053 common shares. As of September 30, 2012, $20,604 of the discount had been amortized to interest expense. See Note 5 for additional information on the derivative liabilities.

Parlette Revocable Trust

On August 20, 2012, the Company issued a convertible promissory note of $11,000 to Parlette Revocable Trust as payment for reimbursement of expenses incurred on behalf of the Company. This note accrues interest at 20%, is payable in one year, unsecured, and is convertible into common stock upon the issuance of the debt. The conversion price is 25% of the average of the five lowest closing prices during the 30 trading days prior to notice of conversion.

The Company analyzed the conversion option for derivative accounting consideration under ASC 815-15 “Derivatives and Hedging” and determined that the instrument should be classified as liabilities due to there being no explicit limit to the number of shares to be delivered upon settlement of the above conversion options. The instrument is measured at fair value at the end of each reporting period or termination of the instrument with the change in fair value recorded to earnings. The fair value of the embedded conversion option resulted in a full discount of $11,000 to the note on the debt issuance date. The discount will be amortized over the term of the note to interest expense.

As of September 30, 2012, $1, 236 of the discount had been amortized to interest expense. See Note 5 for additional information on the derivative liabilities.

CHHJ of Southwest Florida LLC

On March 26, 2012, the Company issued a $75,000 promissory note to CHHJ of Southwest Florida LLC for the exclusive franchise rights of College Hunks Haul Junk and College Hunks Moving for Charlotte and Lee Counties located in Southwest Florida. The note accrues interest at 3%, is payable in two years, unsecured and became convertible in September, 2012, after six months of the debt issuance. The conversion price is the lowest closing price of the Company’s common stock during the previous 10 trading days prior to conversion notice. The related cost is recorded as an operating expense during the seven months ended September 30, 2012 due to uncertainty of the future expected cash flows to be derived from these rights.

The Company analyzed the conversion option for derivative accounting consideration under ASC 815-15 “Derivatives and Hedging” and determined that the instrument should be classified as liabilities due to there being no explicit limit to the number of shares to be delivered upon settlement of the above conversion options. The instrument is measured at fair value at the end of each reporting period or termination of the instrument with the change in fair value recorded to earnings. The fair value of the embedded conversion option resulted in a debt discount of $73,250 to the note on the debt issuance date. The discount will be amortized over the term of the note to interest expense.

As of September 30, 2012, $537 of the discount had been amortized to interest expense. See Note 5 for additional information on the derivative liabilities.

Other Convertible Notes

In August 2010, the Company issued a $120,695 convertible debenture in settlement of a debt that was owed to a former related party that was assigned to a third party in July 2010.

The convertible debenture matures two years from the date of issuance and bears interest at a 20% rate per annum, is unsecured, payable on August 1, 2012 and is convertible into the Company’s common stock at any time at the holder’s option, ~~into common stock~~ at the conversion rate of 25% of the average of the five lowest closing prices during the 30 trading days prior to notice of conversion.

In February 2012, the convertible debt holder sold $90,200 of its convertible note to six other parties. The Company then executed an amended and restated convertible debenture agreement with each of these companies to clarify the amount owed to each. ~~and~~The Company also executed an amended and restated convertible debenture agreement with the original debt holder for the remaining balance. The amended and restated convertible debentures bear interest at a 20% rate per annum, are unsecured, payable on February 24, 2014 and are convertible into the Company’s common stock at any time at the holder’s option, ~~into common stock~~ at the conversion rate of 25% of the average of the five lowest closing prices during the 30 trading days prior to notice of conversion. Subsequently, conversions occurred on five of the seven notes, for total share issuances of 58158,~~503~~723,~~962~~570 for $1025,~~240~~472 of debt conversions ~~of which $8,990 is converted during the four months ended June 30, 2012~~.

The Company analyzed the modification of the term under ASC 470-60 “Trouble Debt Restructurings”. The Company determined the debtor is experiencing financial difficulty and the creditor has a granted a concession under the modified terms and concluded the modification should be accounted under ASC 470-60 “Trouble Debt Restructurings”. The total future cash payments specified by the new terms is greater than the carrying amount of the promissory note of $157,665 (including accrued interest) prior to the modification. Accordingly, the Company did not change the carrying amount of the convertible debt at the date of modification.

The Company also analyzed the conversion option for derivative accounting consideration under ASC 815-15 “Derivatives and Hedging” and determined that the instrument should be classified as a liability due to there being no explicit limit to the number of shares to be delivered upon settlement of the above conversion options. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record fair value of the derivatives as of the inception date of the convertible promissory note and to fair value the instrument as of each subsequent balance sheet date or termination of the instrument with the change in fair value recorded to earnings.

Summary of the convertible debentures at ~~June~~September 30, 2012 is as follows:

Convertible debenture – short term (Garletter, LLC)	$	78,600
Convertible debenture – short term Garlette, LLC	$	78,600
Less unamortized debt discount		(77,524	)
Parlette Revocable Trust		11,000
Net		1,076
Asher Enterprises		22,182
Less unamortized debt discount		(83,270	)
Net		28,512
Convertible debentures – long term
Connied, Inc	$	20858,~~500~~019
Others		110,455
CHHJ of Southwest Florida, LLC		75,000
Less unamortized debt discount		(75,821	)
Others		95,223
Net		55,134
Less unamortized debt discount		(919,324	)
Net		108,918

(5) Derivative Liabilities

The Company valued the embedded derivatives (see discussion below) using the Black Scholes Option Pricing Model based on the following assumptions:

Dividend yield:	0	%
Volatility	~~365~~308.9749%-~~379~~527.9028	%
Risk free rate	0.2112%-0.3134	%

1113

Connied, Inc

As discussed in Note 4, the Company determined that the instruments embedded in the convertible note should be classified as liabilities and recorded at fair value due to there being no explicit limit to the number of shares to be delivered upon settlement of the above conversion options. The Company valued the embedded derivative on the debt issuance date. ~~The fair value of the instruments was determined to be $81,638 as of the debt issuance date, of which $20,500 was recorded as debt discount and $61,138 was recognized as loss on derivatives.~~

The fair value of the conversion option of the note issued on February 29, 2012 was determined to be $6,640,933 on August 29, 2012, the date the note became convertible, of which $837,519 was recorded as debt discount and $5,803,414 was recognized as loss on derivatives. The Company revalued the embedded derivatives as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012. The fair value of the instruments was determined to be $~~211~~2,~~855~~201,867 as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012, and the ~~increase~~decrease from ~~the~~August ~~debt~~22, ~~issuance~~2012 ~~date~~ was allocated to current period operations as a ~~loss~~gain on derivative of $~~130~~4,~~217~~439,066.

The fair value of the conversion option of the note issued in May, 2012 was determined to be $81,638 as of the debt issuance date, of which $20,500 was recorded as debt discount and $61,138 was recognized as loss on derivatives. The Company revalued the embedded derivatives as of September 30, 2012. The fair value of the instruments was determined to be $57,824, and the decrease from the debt issuance date was allocated to current period operations as a gain on derivative of $23,814.

Garlette, LLC

As discussed in Note 4, the Company determined that the instruments embedded in the convertible note should be classified as liabilities and recorded at fair value due to there being no explicit limit to the number of shares to be delivered upon settlement of the above conversion options. The Company valued the embedded derivative on the debt issuance date. The fair value of the instruments was determined to be $737,843 as of the debt issuance date, of which $81,062 was recorded as debt discount and $656,781 was recognized as loss on derivatives.

As a result of the note conversion on debt issuance date, under ASC 815-15 “Derivatives and Hedging”, the instrument is measured at fair value at the date of the termination with the change in fair value recorded to earnings. The fair value of the instruments on conversion date was $737,843 of which $22,410 was reclassified out of liabilities to equity.

The Company revalued the embedded derivatives as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012. The fair value was determined to be $~~802~~218,~~161~~ ~~as of June 30~~240, ~~2012,~~ and the ~~increase~~decrease from the debt issuance date was allocated to current period operations as a ~~loss~~gain on derivative of $86497,~~728~~193.

Asher Enterprises, Inc.

As discussed in Note 4, the Company determined that the instruments embedded in the convertible note should be classified as liabilities and recorded at fair value due to there being no explicit limit to the number of shares to be delivered upon settlement of the above conversion options. The Company valued the embedded derivative on the debt issuance date. The fair value of the instruments was determined to be $205,550 as of the debt issuance date, of which $36,182 was recorded as interest expense and $169,368 was recognized as loss on derivatives.

As a result of multiple note conversions in August and September, 2012, under ASC 815-15 “Derivatives and Hedging”, the instrument is measured at fair value at the date of the termination with the change in fair value recorded to earnings. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, $31,066 was reclassified out of liabilities to equity,

The Company revalued the instrument as of September 30, 2012. The fair value of the instruments was determined to be $23,094 and the decrease from the debt issuance date was allocated to current period operations as a gain on derivative of $151,390.

Parlette Revocable Trust

As discussed in Note 4, the Company determined that the instruments embedded in the convertible note should be classified as liabilities and recorded at fair value due to there being no explicit limit to the number of shares to be delivered upon settlement of the above conversion options. The Company valued the embedded derivative on the debt issuance date. The fair value of the instruments was determined to be $55,762 as of the debt issuance date, of which $11,000 was recorded as debt discount and $44,762 was recognized as loss on derivatives.

The Company revalued the embedded derivatives as of September 30, 2012. The fair value of the instruments was determined to be $30,753 as of September 30, 2012, and the decrease from the debt issuance date was allocated to current period operations as a gain on derivative of $25,009.

CHHJ of Southwest Florida, LLC

As discussed in Note 4, the Company determined that the instruments embedded in the convertible note should be classified as liabilities and recorded at fair value due to there being no explicit limit to the number of shares to be delivered upon settlement of the above conversion options. The Company valued the embedded derivative on the debt issuance date. The fair value of the instruments was determined to be $73,250 as of the debt issuance date, which was recorded as debt discount.

The Company revalued the embedded derivatives as of September 30, 2012. The fair value of the instruments was determined to be $73,348 as of September 30, 2012, and the increase from the debt issuance date was allocated to current period operations as a loss on derivative of $98.

Other Convertible Notes

As discussed in Note 4, the Company determined that the instruments embedded in the convertible ~~note~~notes should be classified as liabilities and recorded at fair value due to there being no explicit limit to the number of shares to be delivered upon settlement of the above conversion options

As a result of the note conversions, under ASC 815-15 “Derivatives and Hedging”, the instrument is measured at fair value at the date of the termination with the change in fair value recorded to earnings. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012, $67135,~~735~~780 was reclassified out of liabilities to equity~~, with $63,943 allocated to the four months ended June 30, 2012~~.

12The Company revalued the embedded derivatives as of September 30, 2012. The fair value of the embedded derivative was determined to be $268,374. The decrease from December 31, 2011 was recognized as a gain on derivative of $555,067 with gain of $1,212,191 allocated to the seven months ended September 30, 2012.

The Company revalued the embedded derivatives as of June 30, 2012. The fair value of the embedded derivative was determined to be $1,140,462. The increase from December 31, 2011 was recognized as a loss on derivative of $248,977, with gain of $407,607 allocated to four months ended June 30, 2012.15

The following tables summarize the derivative liabilities included in the consolidated balance sheet:

Derivative Liabilities
Balance at December 31, 2011 (Successor)	$	959,221
ASC 815-15 addition (Connied, Inc)		6,722,571
ASC 815-15 addition (Garlette, LLC)		737,843
ASC 815-15 addition (Asher Enterprises)		205,550
ASC 815-15 addition (Parlette Revocable Trust)		55,762
ASC 815-15 addition (CHHJ of Southwest Florida, LLC)		73,250
ASC 815-15 deletions (Garlette, LLC)		(22,410	)
ASC 815-15 deletions (Asher)		(31,066	)
ASC 815-15 deletions (Other)		(135,780	)
Change in fair value		(5,691,440	)

Balance at September 30, 2012	$	2,873,501

Derivative Liabilities
Balance at December 31, 2011 (Successor)	$	959,221
ASC 815-15 addition (Connied, Inc)		81,638
ASC 815-15 addition (Garlette, LLC)		737,843
ASC 815-15 deletions (Garlette, LLC)		(22,410	)
ASC 815-15 deletions (Other)		(67,735	)
Change in fair value		465,922
Balance at June 30, 2012	$	2,154,479

The following table summarizes the derivative (gain) or loss for the seven months period ended September 30, 2012 recorded as a result of the derivative liabilities above:

The following table summarizes the derivative (gain) or loss for the four months period ended June 30, 2012 recorded as a result of the derivative liabilities above:

Derivative Liabilities
Balance at March 1, 2012 (Successor)	$	-
Excess of fair value of the derivative over note payable (Connied, Inc)		5,864,552
Excess of fair value of the derivative over note payable (Garlette, LLC)		656,781
Excess of fair value of the derivative over note payable (Asher)		169,368
Excess of fair value of the derivative over note payable (Parlette Revocable Trust)		44,762
Change in fair value		(6,348,025	)

Balance at September 30, 2012	$	378,438

Derivative Liabilities
Balance at March 1, 2012 (Successor)	$	-
Excess of fair value of the derivative over note payable (Connied, Inc)		61,138
Excess of fair value of the derivative over note payable (Garlette, LLC)		656,781
Change in fair value		(190,662	)
Balance at June 30, 2012	$	527,257

(6) Asset Purchase Agreement

In February 2012, the Company completed the acquisition of assets to be used for the expansion of its waste management and site work division. The assets include 140 roll-off dumpsters, 3 roll-off trucks, and construction and site-clearing equipment, including a Bobcat and a grading tractor. As discussed in Note 34, the assets were purchased from Connied, Inc. for a purchase price of $837,519, which was paid with a Promissory Note. Connied, Inc obtained the assets in December 2011 through foreclosure on a loan from Mark’s Dumpster Services, Inc. (“MDS”), an entity controlled by the Company’s officers and directors. However on the date of acquisition, MDS were not control by the Company. The Company determined the purchase of the assets qualifies as a business under ASC 805 “Business Combinations”. The purchase price was allocated 100% to fixed assets and the Company did not identify any intangible assets and assume any liabilities from the predecessor. Additionally, the Company determined they succeeded to the business of MDS and therefore will be required to comply with the rules and regulations of the SEC as required by S-X Rule 8-02 for the presentation of predecessor financial statements. Accordingly, the interim financial statements as of ~~June~~September 30, 2011 and December 31, 2011 are that of MDS, the interim financial statements as of February 29, 2012 are that of MDS and MWDS, and the interim financial statements as of ~~June~~September 30, 2012 are that of the Company.

1316

(7) ~~Equity~~ Preferred Stock

On September 30, the Company issued 500,000 Series A convertible preferred shares to Denise Houghtaling to settle salary payable of $205,124 accrued from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011. The CFO has the right to convert all (but not part) of her shares of Series A convertible preferred stock into 51% of the Company’s common stock issued as of the conversion date. The Series A preferred shares are not redeemable by either the Company or the shareholder, pays zero dividend and carries the right, voting with the holders of the Company’s common shares as if all shares of Series A preferred shares would convert.

The Company evaluated the application of ASC 815-15 and ASC 815-40 for the embedded conversion feature of Series A preferred stock and concluded the embedded conversion feature should be classified as equity and not be bifurcated.

(8) Common Stock

Shares issued for convertible notes:

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012, the Company converted a total of $1241,~~702~~934 convertible debt into 67221,~~621~~261,~~147~~808 common shares. See discussion in Note 4.

~~(8) Related~~On ~~Party~~July ~~Transactions~~30, 2012, the Company issued 1,000,000 and 500,000 common shares to Denise Houghtaling and Mark Houghtaling, respectively, per terms of their employment agreements dated July 23, 2010. The Company issued 143,300,820 common shares to Denise Houghtaling as the settlement of salary payable accrued from July 23, 2010 to December 31, 2010, per terms of her employment agreement dated July 23, 2010. The fair value of the 144,800,820 common shares issued was determined to be $130,246, out of which $93,146 was recorded as reduction of salary payable and $37,100 was recorded as stock compensation expense in the seven months ended September 30, 2012.

As(9) Related ofParty June 30, 2012, the Company had a balance due to related parties of $2,870. This balance is from various advances from the Company’s directors and which are non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on demand.Transactions

~~(9) Subsequent~~As ~~Events~~of September 30, 2012, the Company had a balance due from related parties of $14,203, which is non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on demand.

On July 24, 2012, the Company issued a convertible note of $32,500 to Asher Enterprise, Inc. The note accrues at 8%, is unsecured and due on April 23, 2013, and is convertible at any time 180 days after the debt issuance into the Company’s restricted common stock. The conversion price is 58% of the average of the 3 closing bid prices of the common stock during the (10) Subsequent trading day period prior to conversion. Asher agreed to restrict its ability to convert the Note and receive shares of the Company if the number of shares of common stock beneficially held by Asher and its affiliates in the aggregate after such conversion exceeds 4.99% of the then outstanding shares of common stock.Events

OnIn ~~July~~October ~~30,~~and November 2012, ~~the~~three ~~Company~~debt ~~issued~~holders ~~1,000,000~~converted ~~and 500~~$11,~~000~~169 ~~common shares to Denise Houghtaling and Mark Houghtaling, respectively, per terms~~ of ~~their~~debt ~~employment~~into ~~agreements dated July 23~~135, ~~2010. The Company issued 143~~929,~~300,820~~193 ~~common~~ shares ~~to Denise Houghtaling as the settlement~~ of ~~salary~~common ~~payable accrued from July 23, 2010 to December 31, 2010, per terms of her employment agreement dated July 23, 2010~~stock.

~~On August 1, 2012, a debt holder converted $2,300 of debt into 9,019,608 shares of common stock at conversion rate of $0.000255 per share.~~17

PART I

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

As used in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q (this “Report”), references to the “Company,” the “Registrant,” “we,” “our,” “us” or “Majic Wheels” refer to Majic Wheels Corp., unless the context otherwise indicates.

Forward-Looking Statements

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes thereto, which are included elsewhere in this Form 10-Q (the “Report”). This Report contains forward-looking statements which relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “should,” “expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

For a description of such risks and uncertainties, refer to our Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 22, 2011. While these forward-looking statements, and any assumptions upon which they are based, are made in good faith and reflect our current judgment regarding the direction of our business, actual results will almost always vary, sometimes materially, from any estimates, predictions, projections, assumptions or other future performance suggested herein. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

Overview and Plan of Operation

We were incorporated in Delaware on March 15, 2007. We had intended to engage in the manufacturing and distribution of a radio-controlled toy vehicle using a patented technology that allowed the vehicle to climb inclined and vertical surfaces. In July 2010, there was a change in control of the Company and its focus is now waste management.

In 2007, we commenced a capital formation activity to effect a Registration Statement on Form S-1 with the SEC to raise capital of up to $160,000 from a self-underwritten offering of 20,000,000 (post forward stock split) shares of newly issued common stock in the public markets. The Registration Statement on Form S-1 was filed with the SEC on November 27, 2007, and declared effective on February 22, 2008. In March 2008, we commenced the offering of its registered securities. In April 2008, we completed and closed the offering by selling a total of 20,000,000 (post forward stock split) registered shares of its common stock, par value of $0.0001 per share, at an offering price of $0.00825 per share, for total proceeds of $144,481, net of deferred offering costs of $20,000.

On July 20, 2010, we sold an aggregate of 54,000,000 shares of Common Stock to Baja 4 X 4 Offroad & Fabrications, Inc. (“Baja”) for a total of $118,000 pursuant to an Agreement for the Purchase of Common Stock. The shares represent approximately 36% of the total outstanding securities of the Company. The shares were sold without registration under Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 in reliance on the exemption from registration contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. Two other shareholders sold 22,000,000 shares of our Common Stock to Baja. As a result of the aforementioned stock purchases by Baja, control of the Company in the form of a total of 50.6% of the total issued and outstanding shares of common stock of the Company, which total 150,000,000 shares, was changed to Baja.

We have never declared bankruptcy, have never been in receivership, and have never been involved in any legal action or proceedings. We have not made any significant purchase or sale of assets, nor has the Company been involved in any mergers, acquisitions or consolidations. We are not a blank check registrant as that term is defined in Rule 419(a)(2) of Regulation C of the Securities Act of 1933, because we have a specific business plan and purpose.

We have entered the waste management business and plan to become the premier leader in the environmental safe junk removal, trash hauling, recycling, commercial and residential construction cleanup and demolition business.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed financial statements and in conjunction with the Company's Form 10-K for the year ending December 31, 2011. Results for interim periods may not be indicative of results for the full year.

Results of Operations

For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012 as compared to the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011

Revenues

During the three months ended September 30, 2011 and 2012, revenues for the predecessor company, Mark’s Dumpster Services, Inc. (“MDS”) were $139,344 compared with $217,128 for the Company. Revenues have increased due to an increase in sitework business.

Total operating expenses

During the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2012~~2011 and ~~2011~~2012, total operating expenses for MDS were $~~191~~201,~~167~~595 compared with $~~483~~536,~~556~~678 for the Company. The increase was primarily due to higher compensation and ~~SG&A~~dumpster costs for the Company.

Other expense

During the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2012~~2011 and ~~2011~~2012, total other expenses for MDS were $4546,~~010~~337 compared with $~~716~~43,~~422~~216 for the Company. The ~~increase~~decrease in other expense was primarily due to ~~the~~an ~~change~~increase in ~~the~~interest ~~value~~expenses ofoffset ~~the~~by ~~derivative~~increase ~~liability~~in gain on derivatives.

Net loss

During the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2012~~2011 and ~~2011~~2012, the net loss for MDS was $85108,~~760~~588 compared with $~~934~~362,~~274~~676 for the Company.

For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012 which is combined from the two months ended February 29, 2012 and ~~four~~seven months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012 as compared to the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2011

Revenues

During the nine months ended September 30, 2011 and 2012, revenues for the predecessor company, Mark’s Dumpster Services, Inc. (“MDS”) were $423,223 compared with $599,002 for the combined predecessor and Company. Revenues have increased due to an increase in sitework business.

Total operating expenses

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2012~~2011 and ~~2011~~2012, total operating expenses for MDS were $~~384~~586,~~551~~146 compared with $~~782~~1,~~068~~318,746 for the combined predecessor and Company. The increase was primarily due to higher compensation and SG&A costs for the combined Company.

Other expense

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2012~~2011 and ~~2011~~2012, total other expense for MDS were $89135,~~139~~476 compared with $~~639~~683,~~936~~062 for the combined predecessor and Company. The increase was primarily due to the change in the value of the derivative liability and increase in interest expenses.

Net loss

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, ~~2012~~2011 and ~~2011~~2012, the net loss for MDS was $~~189~~298,~~811~~399 compared with $1,~~040~~402,~~130~~806 for the combined predecessor and Company.

Going Concern Consideration

The Company is formerly a development stage company and only recently commenced principal operations. The Company incurred a net loss of $1,~~016~~379,~~446~~122 for the ~~four~~seven months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2012. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

While management of the Company believes that it will be successful in its capital formation and planned operating activities, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to raise additional equity capital, or be successful in the development of a waste management business that will generate sufficient revenues to sustain the operations of the Company.

AsLiquidity ofand ~~June~~Capital 30, 2012, we had $15,617 in cash. The Company does not believe that its cash resources will be sufficient to fund its expenses over the next 12 months. There can be no assurance that additional capital will be available to the Company. The Company currently has no agreements, arrangements, or understandings with any person to obtain additional funds through bank loans, lines of credit, or any other sources. Since the Company has no such arrangements or plans currently in effect, its inability to raise funds for the above purposes will have a severe negative impact on its ability to remain a viable company.Resources

17As of September 30, 2012, we had $8,305 in cash. The Company does not believe that its cash resources will be sufficient to fund its expenses over the next 12 months. There can be no assurance that additional capital will be available to the Company. The Company currently has no agreements, arrangements, or understandings with any person to obtain additional funds through bank loans, lines of credit, or any other sources. Since the Company has no such arrangements or plans currently in effect, its inability to raise funds for the above purposes will have a severe negative impact on its ability to remain a viable company.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources that are material to investors.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

A smaller reporting company, as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, is not required to provide the information required by this item.

Item 4(T). Controls and Procedures.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this Report, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the 1934 Act). The Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the 1934 Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms.

Changes In ~~internal~~Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 240.15d-15 that occurred during the Company’s last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonable likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

1821

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

There are no pending legal proceedings to which the Company is a party or in which any Director, officer or affiliate of the Company, any owner of record or beneficially of more than 5% of any class of voting securities of the Company, or security holder is a party adverse to the Company or has a material interest adverse to the Company. The Company’s property is not the subject of any pending legal proceedings.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

A smaller reporting company, as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, is not required to provide the information required by this item.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

None.

Purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers

None.

Use of Proceeds

None

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4. (Removed and Reserved).

Item 5. Other Information.

None

1922

Item 6. Exhibits

Exhibit No. Description

Exhibit No.		Description

31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d14(a) Certifications of Denise S. Houghtaling, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director(attached hereto)

32.1		Section 1350 Certifications of Denise S. Houghtaling, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director(attached hereto)

31.1 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d14(a) Certifications of Denise S. Houghtaling, Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director(attached hereto)

101.INS **		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

~~32.1~~** ~~Section~~XBRL ~~1350~~(Extensible ~~Certifications~~Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of ~~Denise~~a S.registration ~~Houghtaling,~~statement ~~Chief~~or ~~Executive~~prospectus ~~Officer~~for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, ~~Chief~~as ~~Financial~~amended, ~~Officer~~is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and ~~Director(attached~~otherwise ~~hereto)~~is not subject to liability under these sections.

2023

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	MAJIC WHEELS CORP.
Dated: August 20, 2012	By:	/s/ Denise S. Houghtaling
Dated: November 19, 2012	By:	/s/ Denise S. Houghtaling
		Name: Denise S. Houghtaling
		Title: Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Director (Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)

Filing Compare · MAJIC WHEELS CORP