UNITED STATES ~~SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION~~

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

~~FORM~~ Form 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012

o TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT

For the transition period from ~~______~~__________ to ~~_____~~__________

Commission file number 000-52848

PALMDALE EXECUTIVE HOMES, CORP. ~~(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)~~

(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

Nevada		26-1125521
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

6767 W. Tropicana Ave., Suite 207, Las Vegas, NV 89103 ~~(Address of principal executive offices)~~

09(Address ~~574~~of ~~2687327~~principal ~~(Issuer's~~executive ~~telephone number~~offices)

~~N/A~~09 ~~(Former~~574 ~~name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)~~2687327

(Issuer's telephone number)

N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Check whether the issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o ~~Smaller reporting company x~~ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company x

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

State the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common equity, as of the latest practicable date 3,~~511~~561,000 common shares issued and outstanding as of ~~May~~August 820, 2012

Check whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes x No o

PALMDALE EXECUTIVE HOMES, CORP.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

BALANCE SHEETS

	MARCH 31			DECEMBER 31
ASSETS
	JUNE 30			DECEMBER 31
	2012			2011
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash	$	626,~~389~~624		$	8,753
Total Current Assets		626,~~389~~624			8,753
Mineral property		50,000			50,000
TOTAL ASSETS	$	5676,~~389~~624		$	58,753
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
LIABILITIES
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	813,~~764~~844		$	2,721
Accounts payable and accrued expenses - related party		4678,~~883~~529			15,236
Advances - related party		1,860			1,860
Promissory note - related party		82,569			82,569
Total Current Liabilities		~~140~~176,~~076~~802			102,386
Total Liabilities		~~140~~176,~~076~~802			102,386
Commitments
STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Common stock, par value $.001, 25,000,000 shares authorized and
3,511,000 shares issued and outstanding		3,511			3,511
3,561,000 and 3,511,000 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		3,561			3,511
Additional paid-in capital		82107,~~359~~309			82,359
Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage		(~~169~~211,~~557~~048	)		(129,503	)
Total Stockholders' Deficit		(83100,~~687~~178	)		(43,633	)
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT	$	5676,~~389~~624		$	58,753

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

PALMDALE EXECUTIVE HOMES, CORP.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF ~~OPERATIONS~~OPERATION

(Unaudited)

							Cumulative from
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Cumulative from January 14, 2000 (Inception)
							January 14, 2000
	2012			2011			2012			2011			to June 30, 2012
	Three Months Ended						(Inception) to
Operating expenses
	March 31,						March 31,
General and administrative	$	9,844		$	5,050		$	18,251		$	7,537		$	108,518
	2012			2011			2012
Consulting fees		30,000			-			60,000			-			96,666
Operating expenses
Loss from operations		(39,844	)		(5,050	)		(78,251	)		(7,537	)		(205,184	)
General and administrative	$	8,407		$	2,487		$	98,674
Interest expense		(1,647	)		-			(3,294	)		-			(5,864	)
Consulting fees		30,000			-			66,666
Net Loss	$	(41,491	)	$	(5,050	)	$	(81,545	)	$	(7,537	)	$	(211,048	)
Loss from operations		(38,407	)		(2,487	)		(165,340	)
Net loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.00	)
Interest expense		(1,647	)		-			(4,217	)
Weighted average number of shares of
Net Loss	$	(40,054	)	$	(2,487	)	$	(169,557	)
common stock outstanding		3,535,725			3,400,000			3,523,363			3,400,000
Net loss per share, basic and diluted	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.00	)
Weighted average number of shares of
common stock outstanding		3,511,000			3,400,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

PALMDALE EXECUTIVE HOMES, CORP.

(An Exploration Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

							Cumulative from
							January 14, 2000
	Three Months Ended						(Inception) to
	Six Months Ended						(Inception) to
	March 31						March 31
	June 30						June 30
	2012			2011			2012
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(4081,~~054~~545	)	$	(27,~~487~~537	)	$	(~~169~~211,~~557~~048	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities
Issuance of common stock for services		-			-			1,870
Changes in assets and liabilities
Accounts payable		6,043			1,529			8,764
Prepaid expenses		-			(10,000	)		-
Accounts payable and accrued interest - related party		31,647			-			46,883
Accounts payable		11,123			6,579			13,844
Net cash used in operating activities		(2,364	)		(958	)		(112,040	)
Accounts payable and accrued interest - related party		63,293			-			78,529
Net cash used in operating activities		(7,129	)		(10,958	)		(116,805	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Purchase of mineral properties		-			-			(50,000	)
Net cash used in investing activites		-			-			(50,000	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Issuance of common stock for cash		-25,000			-			84109,000
Proceeds from advances - related party		-			10,958			33,471
Proceeds from promissory note - related party		-			-			50,958
Net cash provided by financing activities		-25,000			10,958			~~168~~193,429
NET CHANGE IN CASH		(217,~~364~~871	)		-			626,~~389~~624
CASH - BEGINNING OF PERIOD		8,753			-			-
CASH - END OF PERIOD	$	626,~~389~~624		$	-		$	626,~~389~~624
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for interest	$	-		$	-		$	-
Cash paid for taxes	$	-		$	-		$	-
NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS:
Conversion of advances to promissory note - related party	$	-		$	-		$	31,611

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements.

PALMDALE EXECUTIVE HOMES, CORP.

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

Notes to the Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements of Palmdale Executive Homes, Corp. (the "Company") have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"), and should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company's Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and the results of operations for the interim periods presented have been reflected herein. The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Notes to the financial statements which would substantially duplicate the disclosures contained in the audited financial statements for the most recent fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 as reported in Form 10-K, have been omitted.

Note 2 – Related Party ~~Advance and~~ Promissory Note

On August 11, 2011, the Company issued an unsecured promissory note for the full balance of $82,569 owed to Mr. Medina. The promissory note of $82,569 has a term of one year and bears simple annual interest rate of 8%. As at ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, interest of $45,~~217~~864 was accrued on the promissory note and is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses – related party. On August 11, 2012, the Company defaulted on the promissory note with the interest rate increased to 13% under the term of the promissory note.

Note 3 – Related Party Transactions

On September 7, 2011 the Company entered into a month to month consulting agreement with the Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) of the Company at a consulting fee of $5,000 per month. During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, consulting fees of $1530,000 were recorded and $2136,333 was owed to the COO at ~~March~~June 3130, 2012.

On September 7, 2011 the Company entered into a month to month consulting agreement with the Vice President of Geology (the “VP”) of the Company at a consulting fee of $5,000 per month. During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, consulting fees of $1530,000 were recorded and $2136,333 was owed to the VP at ~~March~~June 3130, 2012.

Note 4 – Mining Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement

Effective August 11, 2011, the Company entered into a Mining Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement (the “Property Agreement”) with the Ellers Family Revocable Trust of March 24, 2000 (the “Owner”). Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company leased a mining property consisting of 65 acres of real property interests and 13 unpatented mining claims situated in Tuolumne County, California for a term of three years.

In accordance with the Agreement the Company is obligated to expend $150,000 per year of the lease developing the property, and pay annual advance royalty amounts of $50,000 for the first year (paid by an officer of the Company on behalf of the Company as of December 31, 2011), $50,000 in the second year and $60,000 in the final year.

In addition, the Company must pay a net smelter return royalty of 10% during the term of the lease until expiry of the Agreement or the exercise of the option to purchase. The option to purchase may be exercised by the Company, in its sole discretion, at any time during the three year term of the Agreement. The option to purchase is exercisable for a 75% interest in the property with the Owner retaining a 25% interest as tenants in common. The purchase price of the 75% interest is $2,000,000 in cash plus the ongoing payment of a net smelter return royalty of 2.5% to the Owner.

~~Item 2. Management's~~PALMDALE ~~Discussion~~EXECUTIVE ~~and~~HOMES, ~~Analysis or Plan of Operation~~CORP.

(AN EXPLORATION STAGE COMPANY)

Notes to the Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

As of the date of this report, the annual advance royalty of $50,000 was not paid and the property development of $150,000 has not incurred. Both obligations were due on August 11, 2012. The management is in negotiation with the Ellers Family Revocable Trust to maintain the good standing of the agreement, therefore has not impaired the property.

Note 5 – Stockholders’ Equity

On May 16, 2012 the Company issued 50,000 shares of its common stock for gross cash proceeds of $25,000.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements as that term is defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may", "should", "expects", "plans", "anticipates", "believes", "estimates", "predicts", "potential" or "continue" or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled "Risk Factors", that may cause our or our industry's actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

Our financial statements are stated in United States Dollars (US$) and are prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America for interim financial statements. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes that appear elsewhere in this quarterly report.

As used in this quarterly report, the terms "we", "us", "our company", “Company” and "Palmdale" mean Palmdale Executive Homes, Corp., unless otherwise indicated. All dollar amounts refer to US dollars unless otherwise indicated.

General

Our Business – General

We were incorporated on January 14, 2000 under the laws of the state of Nevada. We are an exploration stage company with no revenues to date. As of the date hereof, we can be defined as a "shell" company, an entity which is generally described as having no or nominal operations and with no or nominal assets or assets consisting solely of cash and cash equivalents.

Other than as set out herein, we have not been involved in any bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceedings, nor have we been a party to any material reclassification, merger, consolidation or purchase or sale of a significant amount of assets not in the ordinary course of our business.

History

We initially intended to purchase either so-called "troubled" property in the area of Palmdale, California or acquire deeds of trust in default held by lenders in the area. As an alternative, we contemplated constructing modular-prefabricated homes in the area. We believed that for little or no money applicable to a down payment, we could acquire the ownership of one or more homes and, in addition, acquire deeds of trust in default on properties.

Durango Project

On or about January 14, 2000, we acquired by quit claim deed an interest in real property located in Palmdale, California subject to encumbrances. On or about January 28, 2000, we requested Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation and California Housing Finance Agency to permit the assumption of the obligations. On February 1, 2000, Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corporation, on behalf of the California Housing Finance Agency, refused to permit the assumption in that we did not meet any of the investor's requirements for the assumption of the loan.

The assumption requirements required the purchaser to occupy the property as its principal residence. Attempts to negotiate assumption failed. Sales efforts to find a purchaser who could use the property as a residence also failed. On or about April 25, 2000, the trustee under the deed of trust recorded a notice of default and election to sell under the deed of trust. On August 21, 2000, we lost our equity in the property.

Trust Deed Investment

We contemplated acquiring deeds of trust in default that secured promissory notes. A deed of trust (similar to a mortgage) is a tripartite contract between a debtor ("trustor"), his creditor ("beneficiary") and an intermediary ("trustee") pursuant to which the trustor technically conveys title to its real estate to the trustee as security for his obligation to the beneficiary. The obligation security is usually for a monetary debt contained in a promissory note. As distinguished from a mortgage which is bipartite contract between the debtor ("mortgagor") and his creditor ("mortgagee"), the traditional mortgage did not contain a power of sale and could only be foreclosed by judicial action. With the then defaults on the real property located in the Palmdale, California, the purchase of these obligations with a resulting sale under the power of sale contained therein, would vest us with legal title. We were unable to negotiate any transactions with conventional lenders; however, we had negotiated to enter into a proposed transaction with a private vendor. Said proposed transaction to acquire the deed of trust under this method did not close.

Current Business

Given the weak outlook for the real estate market, management recently decided it was in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders to consider, and pursue, other lines of business.

In the wake of record high gold prices, management decided to lease a gold mining property located in Tuolumne County, California. On August 11, 2011, we entered into a Mining Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement with the Ellers Family Revocable Trust of March 24, 2000 (“Agreement”). The property consists of 65 acres of real property interests and 13 unpatented mining claims. The lease has a term of three years. Pursuant to the Agreement, we are obligated to expend $150,000 per year of the lease developing the property. In addition, we must pay annual advance royalty amounts of $50,000 for the first year which was paid by an officer of the Company as of September 30, 2011, $50,000 in the second year and $60,000 in the final year. We must also pay a net smelter return royalty of 10% during the term of the lease until expiry of the Agreement or the exercise of the option to purchase. The advance royalty payments are credited against any net smelter returns royalties payable during the term year in question. The option to purchase is exercisable for a 75% interest in the property with the Ellers Family Revocable Trust of March 24, 2000 retaining a 25% interest as tenants in common. The purchase price of the 75% interest is $2,000,000 in cash plus the ongoing payment of a net smelter return royalty of 2.5% to the Ellers Family Revocable Trust of March 24, 2000. If the property option is exercised all lease terms and related obligations expire upon the closing of such sale.

At this point we do not have adequate cash or working capital. Our operations rely on our officers’ advances and sale of our equity to cover our expenses. The property has not been developed and no work has commenced, nor will commence until we receive adequate funding. WeAs of August 11, 2012 we are anin default on the annual royalty payment of $50,000 and exploration ~~stage~~expenditure ~~company~~of $150,000. We are negotiating with the Ellers Family Revocable Trust for revised payment terms to maintain the good standing of the agreement.

7We are an exploration stage company.

Operations

We anticipate that we will expend approximately $240,000 on operations over the twelve months ending ~~March~~June 3130, 2013.

Employees

Currently there are no full time or part-time employees of our company. However, our President, Santiago Medina, our Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Defensor and our Vice President-Geology, Mr. Calpito are consultants of our company. We may engage one or more consultants to assist with manegement of our company and to oversee operations at the Providence Mines site. If business is successful and we experience rapid growth, our current officers and directors may be required to hire new personnel to improve, implement and administer our operational, management, financial and accounting systems.

Plan of Operations - Next 12 Months

We have not yet commenced operations, and have generated no revenue to date. We are an exploration stage company.

We have recently changed operations and management. We intend to develop a mining property we have leased in Tuolumne County, California known as the Providence Mines property.

Over the next twelve months we intend to raise funds through sales of our common stock in private placements to qualified investors or we may consider alternative methods of funding. These funds will be used to develop our leased mining property.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

At March 31, 2012, there was a working capital deficit of $133,687.

At March 31, 2012, our total current assets were $6,389.

At March 31, 2012, our total current liabilities were $140,076.

We had advances from a related party of $1,860 and promissory note payable to our President, Santiago Medina, in the amount of $82,569 at March 31, 2012. Mr. Medina has loaned us a total of $84,429 for the payment of $50,000 on our property and partial payment of costs associated with general and administrative expenses.

Three months ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011

For the three months ended March 31, 2012, we incurred expenditures of $40,054 and posted losses of $40,054. For the three months ended March 31, 2011, we incurred expenditures of $2,487 and posted losses of $2,487. The principal components of the losses for the three months ended March 31, 2012, were administrative expenses, accounting and auditor’s review fees, consulting fees and interest expense incurred on the promissory note.

Operating expenses for the three months ending March 31, 2012, were $38,407 compared to operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2011 of $2,487. Of the operating expenses, general and administrative expense increased from $2,487 in 2011 to $8,407 in the same three month period in 2012 due to our increased accounting and audit fees and our office administrative cost. We incurred total consulting fees of $30,000 payable to our Chief Operating Officer and Vice President of Geology for the three months ended March 31, 2012, which was absent in 2011. For the three months ended March 31, 2012, we accrued interest expenses of $1,647 on a promissory note issued in August 2011, which was absent for the three months ended March 31, 2011.

Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources

At June 30, 2012, there was a working capital deficit of $150,178.

At June 30, 2012, our total current assets were $26,624.

At June 30, 2012, our total current liabilities were $176,802.

We had advances from a related party of $1,860 and promissory note payable to our President, Santiago Medina, in the amount of $82,569 at June 30, 2012. Mr. Medina has loaned us a total of $84,429 for the payment of $50,000 on our property and partial payment of costs associated with general and administrative expenses.

Six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we incurred expenditures of $81,545 and posted losses of $81,545. For the six months ended June 30, 2011, we incurred expenditures of $7,537 and posted losses of $7,537. The principal components of the losses for the six months ended June 30, 2012 were administrative expenses, accounting and auditor’s review fees, consulting fees and interest expense incurred on the promissory note.

Operating expenses for the six months ending June 30, 2012, were $78,251 compared to operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2012 of $7,537. Of the operating expenses, general and administrative expense increased from $7,537 in 2011 to $18,251 in the same six month period in 2012 due to our increased accounting and audit fees and our office administrative cost. We incurred total consulting fees of $60,000 payable to our Chief Operating Officer and Vice President of Geology for the six months ended June 30, 2012, which was absent in 2011. For the six months ended June 30, 2012, we accrued interest expenses of $3,294 on a promissory note issued in August 2011, which was absent for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

Three months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

For the three months ended June 30, 2012, we incurred expenditures of $41,491 and posted losses of $41,491. For the three months ended June 30, 2011, we incurred expenditures of $5,050 and posted losses of $5,050. The principal components of the losses for the three months ended June 30, 2012, were administrative expenses, accounting and auditor’s review fees, consulting fees and interest expense incurred on the promissory note.

Operating expenses for the three months ending June 30, 2012, were $39,844 compared to operating expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2011 of $5,050. Of the operating expenses, general and administrative expense increased from $5,050 in 2011 to $39,844 in the same three month period in 2012 due to our increased accounting and audit fees and our office administrative cost. We incurred total consulting fees of $30,000 payable to our Chief Operating Officer and Vice President of Geology for the three months ended June 30, 2012, which was absent in 2011. For the three months ended June 30, 2012, we accrued interest expenses of $1,647 on a promissory note issued in August 2011, which was absent for the three months ended June 30, 2011.

We will require additional financing before we generate significant revenues. We intend to raise the capital required to meet any additional needs through sales of our securities in secondary offerings or private placements. We have no agreements in place to do this at this time.

There are no assurances that we will be able to obtain additional funds required for our continued operations. In such event that we do not raise sufficient additional funds by secondary offering or private placement, we will consider alternative financing options, if any, or be forced to scale down or perhaps even cease our operations.

APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our unaudited financial statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America for interim financial statements. Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, and expenses. These estimates and assumptions are affected by management's application of accounting policies. We believe that understanding the basis and nature of the estimates and assumptions involved with the following aspects of our financial statements is critical to an understanding of our financials.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information under this Item 3.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

Based on an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Form 10-Q (and the financial statements contained in the report), our Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer has determined that our current disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) or any other factors during the quarter covered by this report, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

Internal control over financial reporting refers to the process designed by, or under the supervision of, our Chief Executive Officer (President)/Chief Financial Officer/Treasurer, and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and includes those policies and procedures that:

-	Pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorization of our management and directors; and

-	Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisitions, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations. It is a process that involves human diligence and compliance and is subject to lapses in judgment and breakdowns resulting from human failures. It also can be circumvented by collusion or improper management override.

Because of such limitations, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. However, these inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process. Therefore, it is possible to design into the process certain safeguards to reduce, thought not eliminate, this risk. Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting. To avoid segregation of duty due to management accounting size, management had engaged an outside CPA to assist in the financial reporting.

Management has used the framework set forth in the report entitled Internal Control - Integrated Framework published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Tread way Commission, known as COSO, to evaluate the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

Management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of the quarter ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

We know of no material, existing or pending legal proceedings against our company, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation. There are no proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial shareholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our interest.

Item 1A Risk Factors

Much of the information included in this quarterly report includes or is based upon estimates, projections or other "forward-looking statements". Such forward-looking statements include any projections or estimates made by us and our management in connection with our business operations. While these forward-looking statements, and any assumptions upon which they are based, are made in good faith and reflect our current judgment regarding the direction of our business, actual results will almost always vary, sometimes materially, from any estimates, predictions, projections, assumptions, or other future performance suggested herein. We undertake no obligation to update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of such statements.

Such estimates, projections or other "forward-looking statements" involve various risks and uncertainties as outlined below. We caution readers of this quarterly report that important factors in some cases have affected and, in the future, could materially affect actual results and cause actual results to differ materially from the results expressed in any such estimates, projections or other "forward-looking statements". In evaluating us, our business and any investment in our business, readers should carefully consider the following factors.

Our independent auditors have expressed substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our net loss since inception is $~~169~~211,~~557~~048. There can be no assurance that will generate significant revenues or achieve profitable operations.

These circumstances raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, as described in the explanatory paragraph to our independent auditors' report on our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011, which are included in this annual report on Form 10-K. Such factors identified in the report are our accumulated deficit since inception, our failure to attain profitable operations and our dependence upon adequate financing to pay our liabilities. If we are not able to continue as a going concern, it is likely investors will lose their investments.

We are in the early stages of our growth and we have not yet generated revenue, which makes it difficult to evaluate whether we will operate profitably.

We are in the early stages of the growth of our company. As a result, we do not have a meaningful historical record of sales and revenues nor an established business track record.

We require substantial funds merely to determine if mineral reserves exist on our mineral properties.

Any potential development and production of our exploration properties depends upon the results of exploration programs and/or feasibility studies and the recommendations of duly qualified engineers and geologists. Such programs require substantial additional funds. Any decision to further expand our plans on these exploration properties will involve the consideration and evaluation of several significant factors including, but not limited to:

-	Costs of bringing the property into production including exploration work, preparation of production feasibility studies and construction of production facilities;

-	Availability and costs of financing;

-	On-going costs of production;

-	Market prices for the products to be produced;

-	Environmental compliance regulations and restraints; and

-	Political climate and/or governmental regulation and control.

Because of the speculative nature of exploration of mineral properties, we may never discover a commercially exploitable quantity of minerals, our business may fail and investors may lose their entire investment.

We can provide investors with no assurance that exploration on our recently leased mining property will establish that commercially exploitable reserves of minerals exist on our property. Additional potential problems that may prevent us from discovering any reserves of minerals on our property include, but are not limited to, unanticipated problems relating to exploration and additional costs and expenses that may exceed current estimates. If we are unable to establish the presence of commercially exploitable reserves of minerals on our property our ability to fund future exploration activities will be impeded, we will not be able to operate profitably and investors may lose all of their investment in our company.

Because of the unique difficulties and uncertainties inherent in mineral exploration ventures, we face a high risk of business failure.

Potential investors should be aware of the difficulties normally encountered by new mineral exploration companies and the high rate of failure of such companies. The likelihood of success must be considered in light of the problems, expenses, difficulties, complications and delays encountered in connection with the exploration of the mineral properties that we plan to undertake. These potential problems include, but are not limited to, unanticipated problems relating to exploration, and additional costs and expenses that may exceed current estimates. The expenditures to be made by us in the exploration of the mineral claim may not result in the discovery of mineral deposits. Problems such as unusual or unexpected formations and other conditions are involved in mineral exploration and often result in unsuccessful exploration efforts. If the results of our exploration do not reveal viable commercial mineralization, we may decide to abandon our claims. If this happens, our business will likely fail.

Because of the inherent dangers involved in mineral exploration, there is a risk that we may incur liability or damages as we conduct our business.

The search for valuable minerals involves numerous hazards. As a result, we may become subject to liability for such hazards, including pollution, cave-ins and other hazards against which we cannot insure or against which we may elect not to insure. At the present time we have no coverage to insure against these hazards. The payment of such liabilities may have a material adverse effect on our financial position.

We have no known mineral reserves and we may not find any gold or silver if we find gold or silver it may not be in economic quantities. If we fail to find any gold or silver or if we are unable to find gold or silver in economic quantities, we will have to suspend operations.

We have no known mineral reserves. Even if we find gold or other valuable minerals, it may not be of sufficient quantity so as to warrant recovery. Additionally, even if we find minerals in sufficient quantity to warrant recovery it ultimately may not be recoverable. Finally, even if any minerals are recoverable, we do not know that this can be done at a profit. Failure to locate minerals in economically recoverable quantities will cause us to suspend operations.

The potential profitability of mineral ventures depends in part upon factors beyond the control of our company and even if we discover and exploit mineral deposits, we may never become commercially viable and we may be forced to cease operations.

The commercial feasibility of mineral properties is dependent upon many factors beyond our control, including the existence and size of mineral deposits in the properties we explore, the proximity and capacity of processing equipment, market fluctuations of prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, allowable production and environmental regulation. These factors cannot be accurately predicted and any one or a combination of these factors may result in our company not receiving an adequate return on invested capital. These factors may have material and negative effects on our financial performance and our ability to continue operations.

We may be adversely affected by fluctuations in ore and precious metal prices.

The value and price of our shares of common stock, our financial results, and our exploration, development and mining activities, if any, may be significantly adversely affected by declines in the price of precious metals and ore. Mineral prices fluctuate widely and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control such as interest rates, exchange rates, inflation or deflation, fluctuation in the value of the United States dollar and foreign currencies, global and regional supply and demand, and the political and economic conditions of mineral producing countries throughout the world.

The prices used in making resource estimates for mineral projects are disclosed, and generally use significantly lower metal prices than daily metals prices quoted in the news media. The percentage change in the price of a metal cannot be directly related to the estimated resource quantities, which are affected by a number of additional factors. For example, a 10% change in price may have little impact on the estimated resource quantities, or it may result in a significant change in the amount of resources.

Supplies needed for exploration may not always be available.

Competition and unforeseen limited sources of supplies needed for our proposed exploration work could result in occasional spot shortages of supplies of certain products, equipment or materials. There is no guarantee we will be able to obtain certain products, equipment and/or materials as and when needed, without interruption, or on favorable terms. Such delays could affect our proposed business plans.

The loss of Mr. Medina or other key management personnel would have an adverse impact on our future development and could impair our ability to succeed.

Our performance is substantially dependent upon the expertise of our President, Mr. Santiago Medina, Chief Operating Officer, Mr. Defensor, and our Vice President-Geology, Mr. Calpito, and other key management personnel, and our ability to continue to hire and retain personnel. It may be difficult to find sufficiently qualified individuals to replace Messrs. Medina, Defensor or Calpito or other key management personnel if we were to lose any one or more of them. The loss of our current officers or any of our key management personnel could have a material adverse effect on our business, development, financial condition, and operating results.

We do not maintain “key person” life insurance on any of our directors or senior executive officers.

We do not expect to declare or pay any dividends.

We have not declared or paid any dividends on our common stock since our inception, and we do not anticipate paying any such dividends for the foreseeable future.

Because the SEC imposes additional sales practice requirements on brokers who deal in our shares which are penny stocks, some brokers may be unwilling to trade them. This means that you may have difficulty in reselling your shares and may cause the price of the shares to decline.

Our shares qualify as penny stocks and are covered by Section 15(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 which imposes additional sales practice requirements on broker/dealers who sell our securities in this offering or in the aftermarket. For sales of our securities, the broker/dealer must make a special suitability determination and receive from you a written agreement prior to making a sale to you. Because of the imposition of the foregoing additional sales practices, it is possible that brokers will not want to make a market in our shares. This could prevent you from reselling your shares and may cause the price of the shares to decline.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

On May 16, 2012 the Company received $25,000 from subscriptions for 50,000 common shares at $0.50 per share. The shares were sold to non-U.S. persons pursuant to the provisions of Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933.

On November 24, 2011, the Company received $50,000 from subscriptions for 100,000 common shares at $0.50 per share. The shares were sold to non-U.S. persons pursuant to the provisions of Regulation S of the Securities Act of 1933.

On August 11, 2011 we issued 11,000 shares of restricted common stock to Tosca Capital Corp. pursuant to the terms of a Finder’s Fee Agreement entered into in connection with the lease of the Providence Mines property.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None

Item 4. ~~Submission~~Mine ofSafty ~~Matters to a Vote of Security Holders~~Disclosures

None

Item 5. Other Information

None

1514

Item 6. Exhibits.

Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K

Exhibit Number and Exhibit Title

(3)	Charter and By-laws
3.1	Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference from our 10SB Registration Statement filed October 5, 2007).
3.2	Bylaws (incorporated by reference from our 10SB Registration Statement filed October 5, 207).
(10)	Material Contracts
10.1	Mining Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement dated August 11, 2011 between Ellers Family Revocable Trust of March 24, 2000 and Palmdale Executive Homes, Corp.*
10.2	Finder’s Fee Agreement between Palmdale Executive Homes Corp. and Tosca Capital Corp. dated August 11, 2011.*
10.3	Promissory Note issued to Santiago Medina dated August 11, 2011.*
10.4	Consulting Agreement between Joseph Calpito and Palmdale Executive Homes Corp. dated September 7, 2011.*
10.5	Consulting Agreement between Matias Defensor and Palmdale Executive Homes Corp. dated September 7, 2011. *
(31)	Section 302 Certification
31.1	Certification of Santiago Medina
(32)	Section 906 Certification
32.1	Certification of Santiago Medina

(3)	Charter and By-laws

3.1	Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference from our 10SB Registration Statement filed October 5, 2007).

3.2	Bylaws (incorporated by reference from our 10SB Registration Statement filed October 5, 2007).

(10)	Material Contracts

10.1	Mining Lease and Option to Purchase Agreement dated August 11, 2011 between Ellers Family Revocable Trust of March 24, 2000 and Palmdale Executive Homes, Corp.*
10.2	Finder’s Fee Agreement between Palmdale Executive Homes Corp. and Tosca Capital Corp. dated August 11, 2011.*
10.3	Promissory Note issued to Santiago Medina dated August 11, 2011.*
10.4	Consulting Agreement between Joseph Calpito and Palmdale Executive Homes Corp. dated September 7, 2011.*
10.5	Consulting Agreement between Matias Defensor and Palmdale Executive Homes Corp. dated September 7, 2011. *

(31)	Section 302 Certification

31.1	Certification of Santiago Medina

(32)	Section 906 Certification

32.1	Certification of Santiago Medina

101.INS **	XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH **	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL **	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF **	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB **	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE **	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

*Previously filed

** XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

1615

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	PALMDALE EXECUTIVE HOMES, CORP.
Date: May 8, 2012	By:	/s/ Santiago Medina
	/s/ Santiago Medina
		Santiago Medina, President and CEO (Principal Executive Officer) and Principal Financial Officer
Date: August 20, 2012	Santiago Medina, President and CEO (Principal Executive Officer) and Principal Financial Officer

1716

Filing Compare · CALIFORNIA MINES CORP.