U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ Quarterly report under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012

¨ Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission File No. 0-52810

ITRACKR SYSTEMS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Florida		05-0597678
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

1191 E Newport Center Drive Suite PH-D Deerfield Beach, FL		33442
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(888) 505-9796 ~~(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)~~

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirement for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act (Check One):

Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	o
Non-accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company	þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12(b)-2 of the Exchange Act) Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. At ~~April~~August 2513, 2012 the registrant had outstanding 28,593,613 shares of common stock, no par value per share.

ITRACKR SYSTEMS, INC.

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		~~PAGE~~	PAGE
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements			1
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31, 2012 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2011	1
	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2012 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2011			1
	Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011	2
	Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011			2
	Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited) For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and the Year Ended December 31, 2011	3
	Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited) For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and the Year Ended December 31, 2011			3
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011			4
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	~~5-11~~		5-11
Item 2.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	~~12-18~~		12-19
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	19		19
Item 4.	Controls and ~~Procedures~~Procedures18	19		19
Item 4(T).	Controls and Procedures	19
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION				20
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings			20
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	21
Item 1A.	Risk Factors			20
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	21
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds			20
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	21
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities			20
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	21
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures			20
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	21
Item 5.	Other Information			20
Item 5.	Other Information	21
Item 6.	Exhibits			20
Item 6.	Exhibits	22
	Signatures			21
Signatures		23

~~ITEM~~Item 1. Financial ~~FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~Statements.

iTrackr Systems, Inc. Consolidated Balance Sheets

iTrackr Systems, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets

	June 30,			December 31,
	2012			2011
Assets	(Unaudited)			(Audited)
Current Assets
Cash	$	65,535		$	130,139
Accounts receivable (Note B)		115,524			125,376
Other current assets		8,387			2,121
Total Current Assets		189,446			257,636

Fixed assets (Note C)		242,004			238,399
Accumulated depreciation		(201,145	)		(179,104	)
Net fixed assets		40,859			59,295
Deposits		3,500			3,500
Intangible assets (Note D)		1,424,000			1,424,000
Intangible asset amortization		(526,167	)		(239,165	)
Goodwill (Note D)		1,143,242			1,143,242
Total Assets	$	2,274,880		$	2,648,508

Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable & accrued expenses (Note E)	$	443,608		$	346,304
Accrue payroll (Note E)		952,000			889,500
Accrued Interest payable (Note F)		53,956			36,946
Convertible promissory notes (Note F)		155,000			70,000
Promissory notes - related party (Note F)		222,812			222,812
Total Current Liabilities		1,827,376			1,565,562

Total Liabilities		1,827,376			1,565,562

Stockholders' Equity (Note G)
Common stock, no par value 100,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding 28,593,613 and 27,843,613 at June 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.		6,190,642			6,055,642
Common stock payable		4,635
Accumulated deficit		(5,747,773	)		(4,972,696	)
Total Stockholders' Deficit		447,504			1,082,946
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	2,274,880		$	2,648,508

	March 31,			December 31,
	2012			2011
Assets	(Unaudited)			(Audited)
Current Assets
Cash	$	46,333		$	130,139
Accounts receivable (Note B)		137,852			125,376
Other current assets		10,124			2,121
Total Current Assets		194,309			257,636
Fixed assets (Note C)		238,399			238,399
Accumulated depreciation		(189,973	)		(179,104	)
Net fixed assets		48,426			59,295
Deposits		3,500			3,500
Intangible assets (Note E)		1,424,000			1,424,000
Intangible asset amortization		(382,667	)		(239,165	)
Goodwill (Note E)		1,143,242			1,143,242
Total Assets	$	2,430,810		$	2,648,508
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable & accrued expenses (Note D)	$	361,755		$	346,304
Accrue payroll (Note D)		952,000			889,500
Accrued Interest payable (Note E)		45,342			36,946
Convertible promissory notes (Note E)		130,000			70,000
Promissory notes - related party (Note E)		222,812			222,812
Total Current Liabilities		1,711,909			1,565,562
Total Liabilities		1,711,909			1,565,562
Stockholders' Equity (Note F)
Common stock, no par value 100,000,000 shares authorized; issued and outstanding 28,343,613 and 27,843,613 at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.		6,165,642			6,055,642
Accumulated deficit		(5,446,741	)		(4,972,696	)
Total Stockholders' Deficit		718,901			1,082,946
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity	$	2,430,810		$	2,648,508

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

iTrackr Systems, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

iTrackr Systems, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)
For the Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2012			2011			2012			2011

Revenue	$	152,708		$	46,826		$	290,955		$	93,076
Cost of sales		85,947			-			169,791			-
Gross profit		66,761			46,826			121,164			93,076

Operating expenses
Selling, General and administrative		112,470			114,477			311,730			226,766
Operations		50,836			-			98,459			-
Product development		41,201			45,200			99,999			94,851
Depreciation and amortization		154,672			8,551			309,043			17,246

Total operating expenses		359,179			168,228			819,231			338,863

Loss from operations		(292,418	)		(121,402	)		(698,067	)		(245,787	)

Other Income and (Expense)
Interest expense		(8,614	)		(5,506	)		(17,010	)		(10,951	)
Amortization of beneficial conversion feature		-			-			(60,000	)		-
Total other income and expense		(8,614	)		(5,506	)		(77,010	)		(10,951	)
Earnings before taxes		(301,032	)		(126,908	)		(775,077	)		(256,738	)
Provision for income taxes		-			-			-			-
Net loss	$	(301,032	)	$	(126,908	)	$	(775,077	)	$	(256,738	)

Net (loss) per common share basic	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.01	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic		28,573,202			20,544,654			28,295,393			20,432,325

	Three Months Ended March 31,
The average shares listed below were not included in the computation of diluted losses per share because to do so would have been antidilutive for the periods presented:
	2012			2011
Warrants		455,333			1,880,676		455,333	1,993,005
Revenue	$	138,247		$	46,250
Stock options		3,380,000			5,505,000		3,380,000	5,505,000
Cost of sales		83,844			-
Convertible promissory notes		3,155,013			452,669		3,138,633	448,130
Gross profit		54,403			46,250
Operating expenses
Selling, General and administrative		199,260			112,289
Operations		47,623			-
Product development		58,798			49,651
Depreciation and amortization		154,371			8,695
Total operating expenses		460,052			170,635
Loss from operations		(405,649	)		(124,385	)
Other Income and (Expense)
Interest expense		(8,396	)		(5,445	)
Amortization of beneficial conversion feature		(60,000	)		-
Total other income and expense		(68,396	)		(5,445	)
Earnings before taxes		(474,045	)		(129,830	)
Provision for income taxes		-			-
Net loss	$	(474,045	)	$	(129,830	)
Net (loss) per common share basic	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.01	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic		28,018,955			20,319,997
The average shares listed below were not included in the computation of diluted losses per share because to do so would have been antidilutive for the periods presented:
Warrants		705,333			2,105,333
Stock options		3,380,000			5,505,000
Convertible promissory notes		2,694,710			1,608,809

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

iTrackr Systems, Inc. Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity (Unaudited) For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and the Year Ended December 31, 2011

iTrackr Systems, Inc.
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Equity
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 (Unaudited) and the Year Ended December 31, 2011

	Common Stock											Total
	Number of								Accumulated			Stockholders'
	Shares			Amount		Payable			(Deficit)			Equity (Deficit)
BALANCES December 31, 2010		20,319,997		$	3,142,538	$	37,500		$	(4,095,092	)	$	(915,054	)

Stock issued in merger		5,000,000			2,380,000								2,380,000
Stock issued for warrant exercise		900,000			215,000								215,000
Stock issued upon option exercises		1,300,000			180,000								180,000
Common stock issued in exchange for services		100,000			43,350								43,350
Common stock issued upon the conversion of debt		243,616			60,904								60,904
Common stock retired		(20,000	)										-
Fair market value of warrants modified					33,850								33,850
Stock to be issued for services reversed							(37,500	)					(37,500	)
Net loss										(877,604	)		(877,604	)
BALANCES December 31, 2011		27,843,613		$	6,055,642	$	-		$	(4,972,696	)	$	1,082,946

Stock issued upon option exercise		500,000			50,000								50,000
Stock issued upon warrant exercise		250,000			25,000								25,000
Common stock to be issued in exchange for services		30,000					4,635						4,635
Common stock issued upon the conversion of debt													-
Amortization of beneficial conversion feature					60,000								60,000
Net loss										(775,077	)		(775,077	)
BALANCES June 30, 2012		28,623,613		$	6,190,642	$	4,635		$	(5,747,773	)	$	447,504

	Common Stock											Total
	Number of								Accumulated			Stockholders'
	Shares			Amount		Payable			(Deficit)			Equity (Deficit)
BALANCES December 31, 2010		20,319,997		$	3,142,538	$	37,500		$	(4,095,092	)	$	(915,054	)
Stock issued in merger		5,000,000			2,380,000								2,380,000
Stock issued for warrant exercise		900,000			215,000								215,000
Stock issued upon option exercises		1,300,000			180,000								180,000
Common stock issued in exchange for services		100,000			43,350								43,350
Common stock issued upon the conversion of debt		243,616			60,904								60,904
Common stock retired		(20,000	)										-
Fair market value of warrants modified					33,850								33,850
Stock to be issued for services reversed							(37,500	)					(37,500	)
Net loss										(877,604	)		(877,604	)
BALANCES December 31, 2011		27,843,613		$	6,055,642	$	-		$	(4,972,696	)	$	1,082,946
Stock issued upon option exercise		500,000			50,000								50,000
Amortization of beneficial conversion feature					60,000								60,000
Net loss										(474,045	)		(474,045	)
BALANCES March 31, 2012		28,343,613		$	6,165,642	$	-		$	(5,446,741	)	$	718,901

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

iTrackr Systems, Inc. Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

iTrackr Systems, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2012 and 2011

	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2012			2011
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(775,077	)	$	(256,738	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		309,043			17,246
Compensation expense on fair value of warrants issued		-			9,800
Compensation expense on common stock issued for services		4,635			-
Amortization of beneficial conversion feature		60,000			-
Changes in operating accounts:
Accounts receivable		9,852			5,299
Other current assets		(6,266	)		-
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		97,304			6,688
Accrued compensation		62,500			125,000
Accrued interest		17,010			10,951
CASH USED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(220,999	)		(81,754	)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisition of furniture and equipment		(3,605	)		-
CASH PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(3,605	)		-

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Issuance of common stock for cash		75,000			175,000
Proceeds from promissory notes		85,000			-
CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		160,000			175,000

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH		(64,604	)		93,246
CASH, beginning of period		130,139			9,051
CASH, end of period	$	65,535		$	102,297

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION CASH PAID DURING THE YEAR FOR:
Taxes paid	$	-		$	-
Interest paid	$	-		$	-

NON-CASH OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Value of Common Stock issued in exchange for services	$	4,635		$	-

	Three Months Ended
	March 31,
	2012			2011
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(474,045	)	$	(129,830	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		154,371			8,695
Amortization of beneficial conversion feature		60,000
Changes in operating accounts:
Accounts receivable		(12,476	)		1,830
Other current assets		(8,003	)		-
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		15,451			42,594
Accrued compensation		62,500			62,500
Accrued interest		8,396			5,445
CASH USED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES		(193,806	)		(8,766	)
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Acquisition of furniture and equipment		-			-
CASH PROVIDED BY INVESTING ACTIVITIES		-			-
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Issuance of common stock for cash		50,000			-
Proceeds from promissory notes		60,000			-
CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES		110,000			-
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH		(83,806	)		(8,766	)
CASH, beginning of period		130,139			9,051
CASH, end of period	$	46,333		$	285
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
CASH PAID DURING THE YEAR FOR:
Taxes paid	$	-		$	-
Interest paid	$	-		$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements

ITRACKR SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012 AND 2011

NOTE A - ORGANIZATION AND GOING CONCERN

Basis of Presentation

The unaudited financial statements of iTrackr Systems, Inc. as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and for the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and 2011 have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as part of our Form 10-K. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the interim financial information have been included. The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the entire year.

Organization

iTrackr, Inc. (the “Company” or “iTrackr”) was formed on May 10, 2006 to develop, market and commercialize a product and inventory search application through a social networking site designed to leverage the best of Internet and Mobile technologies. iTrackr has taken several markets, including eCommerce, social networking and mobile content, and developed a platform that drives value to consumers, retailers and advertising and marketing firms.

In 2009, iTrackr purchased online customer support software technology from ChatStat for approximately $95,000. iTrackr has launched its customer support chat software which facilitates real-time customer support, expert advice, and paid transactions.

On January 12, 2010, the Company closed a share exchange transaction pursuant to which it (i) became the 100% parent of iTrackr, Inc., a Florida corporation (“iTrackr”), (ii) assumed the operations of iTrackr, and (iii) changed its name from Must Haves, Inc. to iTrackr Systems, Inc. iTrackr, Inc. was deemed to be the acquirer in the reverse merger. Consequently, the assets and liabilities and the historical operations of iTrackr, Inc. prior to the Merger are reflected in the financial statements and have been recorded at the historical cost basis of iTrackr, Inc. Our financial statements, after completion of the Merger, include the assets and liabilities of both Must Haves, Inc. and iTrackr, Inc. We accounted for the merger under recapitalization accounting whereby the equity of the acquiring enterprise (iTrackr, Inc.) is presented as the equity of the combined enterprise and the capital stock account of the acquiring enterprise is adjusted to reflect the par value of the outstanding stock of the legal acquirer (Must Haves, Inc.) after giving effect to the number of shares issued in the business combination (1,303,638 shares). Shares retained by the legal acquirer (Must Haves, Inc. 1,303,638 shares) are reflected as an issuance as of the reverse merger date (January 12, 2010) for the historical amount of the net assets of the acquired entity which is in this case is a net liability of $27,515.

On July 12, 2011, iTrackr Systems, Inc. acquired 100% of the issued and outstanding membership interests (the “Units”) of RespondQ, LLC, a Florida limited liability company. The purchase price for the Units was an aggregate of five million (5,000,000) shares of restricted common stock of the Company and promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $100,000. The purchase consideration for the RespondQ Units was approximately $2,480,000 million, which consisted of the notes and the fair value of 5 million issued shares of iTrackr Systems, Inc. common stock.

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. In the course of funding development and sales and marketing activities, the Company has sustained operating losses since inception and has an accumulated deficit of $5,~~446~~747,~~741~~773 and $4,972,696 at ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. In addition, the Company has negative working capital of $1,~~517~~637,~~600~~930 and $1,307,926 at ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

The Company has and will continue to use significant capital to commercialize its products. These factors raise substantial doubt about the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern. In this regard, management is proposing to raise any necessary additional funds not provided by operations through loans or through additional sales of their common stock. There is no assurance that the Company will be successful in raising this additional

ITRACKR SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012 AND 2011

NOTE A - ORGANIZATION AND GOING CONCERN (Continued)

Going Concern

~~capital~~Capital or in achieving profitable operations. The financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or amounts and classification of liabilities that might result from this uncertainty.

NOTE B – ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

The accounts receivable balance of $~~137~~115,~~852~~524 and $125,376 as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, is reported at the gross amount without an allowance. The Company has not experienced any significant bad debts to date. Bad debts are written off once collectability is judged to be unlikely. We periodically review accounts receivable for collectability and will create an allowance for bad debts if our analysis so warrants. No accounts were written off during the three or six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012.

Concentrations of credit risk

The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers. At ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, two customers accounted for 9489% (7851% and 1638%) of accounts receivable.

During the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, three customers accounted for 97% (59%, 28% and 10%) of sales. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, two customers accounted for 9088% (6461% and 2627%) of sales.

NOTE C – FIXED ASSETS

As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, fixed assets consisted of the following:

	March 31,			December 31,
	2012			2011
Computers and office equipment	$	~~107~~111,~~445~~050		$	107,445
Software		129,235			129,235
Leasehold improvements		1,719			1,719
Total fixed assets		~~238~~242,~~399~~004			238,399
Accumulated depreciation		(~~189~~201,~~973~~145	)		(179,104	)
Fixed assets, net	$	4840,~~426~~859		$	59,295

During the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized $1011,~~869~~172 and $8,~~695~~551, respectively in depreciation expense. During the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011, the Company recognized $22,041 and $17,247, respectively in depreciation expense.

NOTE D - GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

As a result of the purchase of RespondQ, LLC on July 12, 2011, the Company recognized $1,424,000 of intangible assets and $1,143,242 of goodwill, which represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net tangible and intangible assets acquired.

Total intangible assets, which are being amortized, and goodwill consists of the following:

	March 31, 2012
	June 30, 2012
	Gross Carrying		Accumulated					Net Book
	Amount		Amortization			Impairment		Value
Customer relationships	$	324,000	$	(~~216~~297,000	)	$	-	$	~~108~~27,000
Purchased technology		750,000		(~~166~~229,~~667~~167	)		-		~~583~~520,~~333~~833
Marketing related		350,000		-			-		350,000
Goodwill		1,143,242		-			-		1,143,242
Total	$	2,567,242	$	(~~382~~526,~~667~~167	)	$	-	$	2,~~184~~041,~~575~~075

ITRACKR SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012 AND 2011

NOTE D - GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS (Continued)

The customer relationship intangible asset is being amortized on a straight-line basis over 12 months or the estimated useful life of that portion of the allocated purchase price of RespondQ, LLC whereas the purchased technology is being amortized over three years on a straight-line basis based on the estimated useful life of the technology purchased. The marketing related intangible asset relates to the trade name and internet domain name of RespondQ and, like goodwill, is not being amortized, but tested annually for impairment. No impairment of goodwill or intangible assets has been recorded. Amortization expense related to intangible assets was $143,~~502~~500 and $287,000 during the three and six months ended June ~~March 31~~30, 2012.

NOTE E – ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES

Accounts payable and accrued expenses at ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 consisted of $11,180 of health insurance premium reimbursement due to John Rizzo, former CEO, $5442,~~664~~740 of professional services and $~~295~~389,~~911~~688 of trade payables.

Accounts payable and accrued expenses at December 31, 2011 consisted of $9,180 of health insurance premium reimbursement due to John Rizzo, former CEO, for which six payments totaling $50,820 were made during 2011 with no other payments made since January 2007, $37,471 of professional services and $299,653 of trade payables.

Accrued compensation of $952,000 and $889,500 as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, represents amounts accrued and unpaid as of the related balance sheet date and due to our former CEO, John Rizzo. Pursuant to Mr. Rizzo’s employment agreement(s) effective each year starting in January 2007, the Company has been and is obligated to pay Mr. Rizzo and annual salary of $250,000. Mr. Rizzo, received 5,000,000 shares in lieu of salary for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 and $90,000 in cash payments during 2009. Mr. Rizzo has received no other salary based cash payments.

NOTE F – NOTES

Convertible Promissory Notes – 3rd Party	~~March~~June 3130,		December 31,
	2012		2011
Note payable issued in connection with the purchase of RespondQ, LLC to Iselsa II, LLC, bears interest at 10% per year, is convertible into shares of common stock upon default at a conversion price of $0.10 per share, matured October 12, 2011 and is currently in default.	$	70,000	$	70,000
On July 12, 2011, the company issued a convertible promissory note in connection with the purchase of RespondQ, LLC. The note bears interest at 10% per year, is convertible into shares of common stock upon default at a conversion price of $0.10 per share, matured October 12, 2011 and is currently in default.	$	70,000	$	70,000
On January 9, 2012, The company issued a convertible promissory note in the amount of $60,000. Ther terms of the note provide for interest at 12% per annum, maturity date of July 1, 2012 and is convertible into shares of the Company at a fixed conversion price of $0.15 per share. The Company determined that the Note was issued with a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”) due to the conversion price ($0.15) being less than the closing stock price of $0.50 on the date of issuance, and the conversion feature being in-the-money. Thus, the BCF has been determined based on the gross note amount, and recorded as a discount to reduce the carrying value of the note and increase additional-paid-in-capital. The Company calculated the initial BCF on the closing date of the transaction to be $140,000 using the intrinsic value method. Since this amount is greater than the $60,000 value of the note, the Company reduced the initial carry value of the note to zero effectively recording a BCF of $60,000 as additional-paid-in-capital. The BCF discount was expensed when the note became convertible which was on the date of issuance.	$	60,000	$	-
On January 9, 2012, the company issued a convertible promissory note in the amount of $60,000. The terms of the note provide for interest at 12% per annum, maturity date of July 1, 2012 and is convertible into shares of the Company at a fixed conversion price of $0.15 per share. The Company determined that the Note was issued with a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”) due to the conversion price ($0.15) being less than the closing stock price of $0.50 on the date of issuance, and the conversion feature being in-the-money. Thus, the BCF has been determined based on the gross note amount, and recorded as a discount to reduce the carrying value of the note and increase additional-paid-in-capital. The Company calculated the initial BCF on the closing date of the transaction to be $140,000 using the intrinsic value method. Since this amount is greater than the $60,000 value of the note, the Company reduced the initial carry value of the note to zero effectively recording a BCF of $60,000 as additional-paid-in-capital. The BCF discount was expensed when the note became convertible which was on the date of issuance.	$	60,000	$	-
On June 29, 2012, The company received $25,000. The terms of the note provide for interest at 10% per annum, maturity date of January 10, 2013 and is convertible into shares of the Company at a fixed conversion price of $0.05 per share upon default.	$	25,000	$	-
Total Convertible Promissory Notes – 3rd Party	$	155,000	$	70,000

ITRACKR SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012 AND 2011

NOTE F – NOTES (Continued)

During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company: 1) issued a $70,000 convertible promissory note to Iselsa II, LLC (See table above); and 2) converted 100% of the debt held by three different parties, or $56,000 of principle and $4,904 of accrued interest into 243,616 shares of common stock.

OnInterest ~~our~~expense related to the non-related party notes payable, during the ~~Company~~three ~~recognized~~months ~~interest~~ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $3,540 and $1,179, respectively.Interest expense related to the non-related party notes payable during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and ~~2011of~~2011 was $36,~~323~~864 and $12,~~530~~346, respectively. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company had outstanding $610,~~621~~161 and $3,299, respectively, of accrued interest due for non-related party notes payable.

Promissory Notes - Related Party	March 31,
	2012		2011
Note payable to Bluewater Advisors, Inc. a company wholly owned by John Rizzo, our former CEO; convertible into common stock (conversion price 50% below the previous 10 day average closing price) upon default, bears interest at 9% per year, Matured July 1, 2011 and is currently in default.	$	192,812	$	192,812
Note payable issued in connection with the purchase of RespondQ, LLC to Idiama, LLC, bears interest at 10% per year, is convertible into shares of common stock upon default at a conversion price of $0.10 per share, matured October 12, 2011 and is currently in default.	$	30,000	$	30,000
On July 12, 2011, the company issued a convertible promissory note in connection with the purchase of RespondQ, LLC. The note bears interest at 10% per year, is convertible into shares of common stock upon default at a conversion price of $0.10 per share, matured October 12, 2011 and is currently in default.	$	30,000	$	30,000

During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company issued a $30,000 convertible promissory note to Idiama, LLC (See table above) which is 100% owned by Mrs. Rizzo the spouse of our former CEO, John Rizzo and originated as part of the purchase price paid for RespondQ, LLC.

OnInterest expense related to our related party notes payable, during the ~~Company~~three ~~recognized~~months ~~interest~~ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was $5,074 and $4,326, respectively. Interest expense related to our related party notes payable during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and 2011 ofwas $510,~~074~~149 and $48,~~279~~605, respectively. As of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the Company has outstanding $3843,~~721~~795 and $33,647, respectively, of accrued interest due under the notes above.

NOTE G – STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY

Preferred Stock

The Company has authorized 10,000,000 shares of no par value preferred stock available for issuance. No shares of preferred stock have been issued as of ~~March~~June 3130, 2012.

Common Stock Issued - Summary

The Company has authorized 100,000,000 shares of no par value common stock available for issuance. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company issued 7,543,616 shares of common stock, including 5,000,000 as a part of the RespondQ, LLC purchase. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock bringing the balance of shares outstanding to 28,343,613 as of March 31, 2012 compared to 27,843,613 and 20,319,997 as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Stock Issued for Debt Repayment

During the three months ended March 31, 2012, no shares were issued in connection with the conversion of debt.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company converted $56,000 of principle and $4,904 of accrued interest into 243,616 shares of restricted common stock.

ITRACKR SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012 AND 2011

NOTE G – STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY (Continued)

Common Stock Issued - Summary

The Company has authorized 100,000,000 shares of no par value common stock available for issuance. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company issued 7,543,616 shares of common stock, including 5,000,000 as a part of the RespondQ, LLC purchase. During the six months ended June 30, 2012, the Company issued 750,000 shares of common stock bringing the balance of shares outstanding to 28,593,613 as of June 30, 2012 compared to 27,843,613 and 20,319,997 as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Stock Issued for Debt Repayment

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, no shares were issued in connection with the conversion of debt.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company converted $56,000 of principle and $4,904 of accrued interest into 243,616 shares of restricted common stock.

Stock Issued for Cash

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, the Company 1) issued 500,000 shares of common stock upon the exercise of options and received $50,000., and 2) issued 250,000 shares of common stock upon the exercise of warrants and received $25,000

During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company 1) received $315,000 upon the exercise of warrants to purchase 1,400,000 shares of common stock, and 2) received $80,000 upon the exercise of options to purchase 800,000 shares of common stock.

Stock Issued for Services

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, the Company ~~did~~recognized ~~not~~$4,635 ~~issue~~related ~~any~~to ~~shares~~the 15,000 monthly restricted common share amount due to our interim CEO in exchange for his services. As of June 30, 2012, the interim CEO was due 30,000 shares which were not issued prior to the end of the most recent quarter, but which are included in the calculation of earnings per share.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company issued 100,000 in exchange for services valued at $43,350 and rendered during 2011. Also, 125,000 shares that were to be issued to a former employee were canceled and related expense of $37,500 reversed in the current period.

NOTE H – WARRANTS

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, the Company had ~~705~~455,333 Warrants outstanding entitling the holder thereof the right to purchase one share of common stock for each warrant held as follows:

			Exercise
Issuance	Number of		Price Per		Expiration
Date	Warrants		Warrant		Date
1/19/2010		36,000	$	0.75	1/19/15
1/19/2010		56,000	$	0.75	1/19/15
2/1/2010		13,333	$	0.75	2/1/15
3/1/2010		~~600~~350,000	$	0.10	10/31/12
Total		~~705~~455,333

During the ~~year~~six months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2011~~2012, the holder of the 3/1/2010 ~~warrant~~warrants in the table above exercised ~~400~~250,000 warrants resulting in ~~$40,000 to~~ the ~~company.~~issuance ~~Additionally,~~of ~~the Company modified one outstanding warrant to reduce the exercise price in order to induce the holder to exercise. Specifically~~250, ~~for 1,~~000~~,000~~ ~~warrants~~restricted ~~the~~common ~~exercise~~shares ~~price~~and ~~was reduced from $0.40 to $0.35. The holder then exercised 500,000 warrants resulting in $175,000 to~~ the ~~Company.~~receipt Then, later in the year, in order to induce the same holder to exercise the remaining 500,000 warrants, the Company decreased the exercise price from $0.35 to $0.20. The holder then exercised 500,000 warrants resulting in $100,000 to the Company. As a result of ~~the modifications, the Company determined the difference in the fair value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes Options Pricing Model and recorded~~ $925,~~800 and $24,050 of stock compensation expense for the first and second modifications, respectively.~~000

All the warrants issued through March 31, 2012 are classified as equity on our balance sheet as they require physical settlement, contain no performance contingencies, have a fixed exercise price and are exercisable by the holder at any time through the expiration date of the warrant. Each warrants fair value was calculated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model.

ITRACKR SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012 AND 2011

InNOTE ~~June~~H ~~2007~~– ~~the~~WARRANTS ~~Board of Directors of the Company adopted the 2007 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan~~ (~~the "Plan"~~Continued). The Plan was ratified at the 2007 shareholder’s meeting (the "Effective Date"). The purpose of this Plan is to attract and retain directors, officers and other employees and non-employees of the Company and its Subsidiary and to provide to such persons incentives and rewards for performance. The Company may issue each of the following under the Plan: Incentive Options, Nonqualified Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock Awards, Performance Stock Awards or any other award approved by the Board to employees, directors, officers and consultants.. No Award shall be granted pursuant to the Plan ten years after the Effective Date. Stock options to purchase shares of our common stock expire no later than ten years after the date of grant. The total number of shares available under the Plan is Fifteen Million (15,000,000). No Plan participant will be granted the right, in the aggregate, for more than Two Million (2,000,000) Common Shares during any calendar year.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, the holder of the 3/1/2010 warrant in the table above exercised 400,000 warrants resulting in $40,000 to the company. Additionally, the Company modified one outstanding warrant to reduce the exercise price in order to induce the holder to exercise. Specifically, for 1,000,000 warrants the exercise price was reduced from $0.40 to $0.35. The holder then exercised 500,000 warrants resulting in $175,000 to the Company. Then, later in the year, in order to induce the same holder to exercise the remaining 500,000 warrants, the Company decreased the exercise price from $0.35 to $0.20. The holder then exercised 500,000 warrants resulting in $100,000 to the Company. As a result of the modifications, the Company determined the difference in the fair value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes Options Pricing Model and recorded $9,800 and $24,050 of stock compensation expense for the first and second modifications, respectively.

All the warrants issued through June 30, 2012 are classified as equity on our balance sheet as they require physical settlement, contain no performance contingencies, have a fixed exercise price and are exercisable by the holder at any time through the expiration date of the warrant. Each warrants fair value was calculated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model.

NOTE I – 2007 LONG-TERM EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN

In June 2007 the Board of Directors of the Company adopted the 2007 Long-Term Equity Incentive Plan (the "Plan"). The Plan was ratified at the 2007 shareholder’s meeting (the "Effective Date"). The purpose of this Plan is to attract and retain directors, officers and other employees and non-employees of the Company and its Subsidiary and to provide to such persons incentives and rewards for performance. The Company may issue each of the following under the Plan: Incentive Options, Nonqualified Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock Awards, Performance Stock Awards or any other award approved by the Board to employees, directors, officers and consultants. No Award shall be granted pursuant to the Plan ten years after the Effective Date. Stock options to purchase shares of our common stock expire no later than ten years after the date of grant. The total number of shares available under the Plan is Fifteen Million (15,000,000). No Plan participant will be granted the right, in the aggregate, for more than Two Million (2,000,000) Common Shares during any calendar year.

We measure all stock-based compensation awards using a fair value method on the date of grant and recognize such expense in its consolidated financial statements over the requisite service period. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to calculate the fair value of warrants and stock option grants. The Black-Scholes option pricing model requires management to make assumptions regarding the option lives, expected volatility, and risk-free interest rates, all of which impact the fair value of the option and, ultimately, the expense that will be recognized over the life of the option.

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, the Company issued 500,000 shares of common stock pursuant to option exercises resulting in $50,000 to the Company

During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company issued 800,000 shares of common stock pursuant to option exercises resulting in $80,000 to the Company, and canceled 825,000 options that expired due to termination of services by the related parties and their failure to exercise their respective options.

The following table summarizes information about options outstanding at ~~March~~June 3130, 2012:

		Options Outstanding						Options Exercisable
		Number		Weighted		Weighted				Weighted
Range of		Outstanding		Average		Average				Average
Exercise		At ~~March~~June 3130,		Contractural		Exercise		Number		Exercise
Prices		2012		Life (years)		Price		Outstanding		Price
$	0.40		1,000,000		5.5000	$	0.40		1,000,000	$	0.40
	0.25		1,250,000		64.0471		0.25		1,250,000		0.25
	0.10		1887,~~387,~~500		5.5000		0.10		1887,~~387,~~500		0.10
	0.05		242,500		5.5000		0.05		242,500		0.05
Total			3,~~880~~380,000		5.6618	$	0.2224		3,~~880~~380,000	$	0.2224

A summary of the Company’s stock option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2012 and the years ended December 31, 2011 and related information follows:

	Number of Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price ($)		Options Exerciseable as of	Number of Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price ($)
Outstanding at December 31, 2010		5,505,000		$	0.18	December 31, 2010		5,505,000	$	0.18
Forfeitures		(825,000	)	$	0.06	December 31, 2011		3,880,000	$	0.22
Exercises		(800,000	)	$	0.10	March 31, 2012		3,880,000	$	0.22
Outstanding at December 31, 2011		3,880,000		$	0.22
Outstanding at March 31, 2012		3,880,000		$	0.22
Available for grant at March 31, 2012		2,138,001

During the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized no compensation expense related to stock options. From inception to date, the Company has recognized $178,844 of compensation expense related to stock options.

ITRACKR SYSTEMS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2012 AND 2011

NOTE I – 2007 LONG-TERM EQUITY INCENTIVE PLAN (Continued)

A summary of the Company’s stock option activity for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and the year ended December 31, 2011 and related information follows:

	Number of Options			Weighted Average Exercise Price ($)		Options Exerciseable as of	Number of Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price ($)
Outstanding at December 31, 2010		5,505,000		$	0.18	December 31, 2010		5,505,000	$	0.18
Forfeitures		(825,000	)	$	0.06	December 31, 2011		3,880,000	$	0.22
Exercises		(800,000	)	$	0.10	June 30, 2012		3,380,000	$	0.24
Outstanding at December 31, 2011		3,880,000		$	0.22
Exercises		(500,000	)	$	0.10
Outstanding at June 30, 2012		3,380,000		$	0.240

Available for grant at June 30, 2012		2,138,001

During the Six months ended June 30, 2012 and the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized no compensation expense related to stock options. From inception to date, the Company has recognized $178,844 of compensation expense related to stock options.

NOTE J – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company has a note payable outstanding to Bluewater Advisors, Inc. and Idiama, LLC, companies wholly owned by John Rizzo, our former CEO and his wife, respectively. See NOTE F - NOTES for additional information. Additionally, Mr. Rizzo is due $952,000 of unpaid compensation and $11,180 of accrued health insurance premiums. See NOTE E – ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES.

NOTE K - COMMITMENTS

Upon the purchase of RespondQ, LLC on July 12, 2011, the Company assumed a lease for office space originally entered into on January 17, 2011 and expiring on January 17, 2012. We are currently on a month-to-month rental basis. The lease requires the Company to pay all executory costs such as maintenance and insurance totaling approximately $2,122 per month. Rent expense for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and 2011 was approximately $6,366 and $0, respectively. Rent expense for the six months ended June 30, 2012 and 2011 was approximately $12,732 and $0, respectively.

On January 4, 2011, the Company entered into an Enterprise Cloud Master Services Agreement (the "Agreement") with Terremark North America where Terremark provides enterprise level cloud computing data center related services for our iTracker.com platform for an initial period of 24 months and automatically renewing on successive 12 month terms unless terminated 90 days prior to expiration of the then current term. The Agreement provides for a monthly payment of $6,000 billed monthly. During the three months ended March 31, 2012, the Company recognized $12,000 of expense under this agreement.

NOTE L – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification 855, Subsequent Events, Including ASC 855-10-S99-2, the Company evaluated subsequent events through ~~April~~the ~~30,~~date ~~2012~~of this report.

On April 11, 2012, the Company issued 250,000 shares of common stock upon the exercise of a warrant resulting in $25,000 to the Company.

~~ITEM~~Item 2. ~~MANAGEMENT~~ Management'Ss ~~DISCUSSION~~Discussion ~~AND~~and ~~ANALYSIS~~Analysis OFof ~~FINANCIAL~~Financial ~~CONDITION~~Condition ~~AND~~and ~~RESULTS~~Results OFof ~~OPERATIONS~~Operations.

This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements including statements regarding our expectations, beliefs, intentions or future strategies that are signified by the words “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “believes” or similar language. These forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors. All forward-looking statements included in this quarterly report are based on information available to us on the date hereof and speak only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise. The factors discussed elsewhere in this quarterly report are among those factors that in some cases have affected our results and could cause the actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this quarterly report.

Overview

We are an ~~emerging~~ ecommerce and social media software and services company. We have developed two technology platforms branded as RespondQ (See www.RespondQ.com) and iTrackr (See www.itrackr.com) both of which enable web based and local businesses to increase sales through innovative technology and increased web presence.

Through our RespondQ chat communications platform, the Company offers a comprehensive suite of real-time, live interaction tools designed to allow our customers the information they need while interacting with potential purchasers, including our proprietary chat application, live web statistics, live visitor engaging, live web analytics and real time support ticketing for both enterprise and single site users.

In order to sustain RespondQ's growth, our strategy is to expand our customer base. To accomplish this, we are focused on the following initiatives:

~~Continuation~~Technology ofand ~~building~~Process ~~brand~~Enhancements. We ~~strength~~take ~~within~~a no ~~the~~nonsense ~~home~~approach ~~services~~to ~~vertical~~Chat. ~~while~~Our ~~expanding~~platform's ~~into~~features ~~New~~are ~~Markets.~~all ~~RespondQ~~geared ~~continued~~ to ~~develop~~sales ~~its~~and ~~market~~customer ~~position~~service. byWe ~~increasing~~regularly ~~its~~add ~~client~~new ~~base,~~features and ~~expanding~~functionality ~~its~~to ~~offerings~~our ~~within~~platform ~~its~~to ~~existing~~further ~~customer~~enhance ~~base~~value to our customers. In ~~late~~ 2011, we ~~identified~~enhanced ~~several~~our ~~markets~~reporting, ~~that~~analysis ~~have a high potential for revenue growth~~ and ~~key~~administrative ~~industries~~tools ~~within~~as ~~that~~part ~~are~~of ~~not~~our ~~currently~~overall ~~utilizing~~portfolio ~~chat technologies. Several~~ of ~~these~~features, ~~industries~~as ~~include~~well ~~but~~as ~~are~~our ~~not~~ability ~~limited~~ to; ~~Affiliate Networks~~capture, ~~Specialty~~analyze ~~Retail,~~and ~~Auto~~report ~~Insurance,~~on ~~Healthcare,~~the ~~Club~~substantial ~~and~~amount of ~~Membership~~online ~~Groups,~~data ~~Education,~~we ~~Government,~~collect ~~and~~on ~~Travel. Continuing~~behalf toof ~~grow~~ our ~~client~~clients. ~~base~~More ~~will~~recently ~~enable~~we usstreamlined tothe ~~strengthen~~RespondQ ~~our~~customer ~~recurring~~service ~~revenue~~standard ~~stream. Our~~operating ~~primary~~procedures ~~focus~~to ofdecrease ~~expansion~~response ~~being that of Full Service chat solutions~~times.

~~Creating~~Marketing. For the past three years, RespondQ ~~International~~has ~~Presence. During~~been ~~2011,~~focused weon ~~continued~~providing ~~our~~and ~~investment~~refining inour ~~building~~platform ~~out~~on ~~new~~a ~~sales~~full ~~collateral~~service, ~~and~~pay ~~services~~for ~~personnel~~performance tomodel ~~expand~~in ~~our~~the ~~customer~~home ~~base~~services vertical. WeOver ~~have~~the ~~identified~~same period the ~~Latin~~chat ~~America~~industry ~~market,~~has ~~including~~experienced ~~Mexico,~~significant ~~Panama,~~growth ~~Columbia~~in ~~and~~the ~~Venezuela~~monthly tosubscriber ~~present~~base ~~the~~of ~~best~~websites ~~near-term~~purchasing ~~opportunity~~chat software for ~~expansion~~internal use. WeNow ~~are~~that ~~currently~~our ~~evaluating~~platform ~~sales~~ and ~~marketing~~technology ~~strategies~~are proven and ~~several~~refined ~~partnership~~RespondQ ~~opportunities~~plans to ~~support~~make ~~expansion~~our ~~directly~~platform ~~into~~widely ~~these~~available ~~countries~~on a monthly subscription basis to those looking for a top shelf, self-service solution for a highly competitive price while continuing to offer pay for performance pricing for larger users.

~~Continuing~~Our tonewly ~~Build~~redesigned ~~Brand~~and ~~Recognition. As~~currently ain ~~pioneer~~beta oftesting ~~pay~~iTrackr ~~for~~direct ~~performance~~deals ~~chat~~platform ~~solutions,~~represents ~~RespondQ~~the ~~enjoys~~latest ~~recognition~~evolution ~~and~~of ~~credibility~~the ~~due~~daily todeal ~~our~~business ~~success~~model ~~with~~by ~~companies~~combining ~~like~~the ~~Saveology,~~benefits ~~Acceller~~of ~~and~~social ~~Digital Mojo. We strategically target decision makers within key vertical markets~~networking, ~~leveraging~~daily ~~customer~~deals ~~successes to generate increased awareness~~ and ~~demand~~couponing ~~for~~onto ~~our~~a ~~unique~~technology ~~chat~~platform ~~technologies.~~that Insignificantly ~~addition,~~enhances weweb ~~continue~~presence toand ~~develop~~allows ~~relationships~~both ~~with~~ the ~~media,~~local ~~industry analysts and relevant~~ business ~~associations~~owner ~~to reinforce our position~~ and ~~leadership within~~ the ~~industry.~~consumer ~~Our brand name is also visible~~ to ~~both~~create ~~business users~~ and ~~consumers~~request ~~where~~personalized ~~our~~discounts ~~software is present~~ on athe ~~site~~fly. ~~When~~The apremise ~~visitor~~of ~~engages~~iTrackr inis athat ~~chat~~consumers ~~session~~should ondrive adiscounts ~~customer’s~~based ~~website, our brand name is displayed~~ on ~~the~~their ~~chat~~specific ~~window~~desires asand ~~“Powered~~needs Byand ~~RespondQ”.~~be Weable ~~believe~~to ~~that~~easily ~~this~~find ~~high-visibility~~those ~~placement~~discounts ~~will~~any ~~continue~~time tono ~~create~~matter ~~brand~~where ~~awareness~~they ~~and increased demand for our solutions~~are.

Increasing the Value of Our Service to Our Clients. We regularly add new features and functionality to our services to further enhance value to our customers. In 2011, we continued to enhance our reporting, analysis and administrative tools as part of our overall portfolio of features, as well as our ability to capture, analyze and report on the substantial amount of online data we collect on behalf of our clients. Our clients may use these capabilities to increase productivity, manage call center staffing, develop one-to-one marketing tactics and pinpoint sales opportunities. Through these and other innovations, we intend to reinforce our value proposition to clients, which we believe will result in additional revenue from new and existing clients over time.

Our newly designed and currently in beta testing iTrackr direct deals platform represents the latest evolution of the daily deal business model by combining the benefits of social networking, daily deals and couponing onto a technology platform that significantly enhances web presence and allows both the local business owner and the consumer to create and request personalized discounts on the fly. The premise of iTrackr is that consumers should drive discounts based on their specific desires and needs and be able to easily find those discounts any time no matter where they are.

In order to grow iTrackr, our strategy is to complete our technology development and focus on the following initiatives:

·	open beta testing of iTrackr.com to solicit and garner feedback from users in order to eliminate bugs in the software, increase usability, and improve user friendliness;

·	populate our database with 1 million currently active merchant profiles determined by their SIC codes and continually increasing our profile base as we expand in to different local markets;

·	promote itrackr virally to enhance visibility across the social networks;

·	Offer the platform as a private label tool to third party merchants;

·	engage with an international B2B sales organization for outbound and direct marketing campaigns to rapidly solicit the businesses within our proprietary database to activate their profiles on iTrackr.com;

·	continue to invest in the depth of our website to provide the look, feel and experience our users demand.

·	Cross sell to the 1 million pre populated profiles currently in our database our RespondQ chat communication platform;

·	offer our platform to consumers free of charge on wired and wireless mediums;

·	reducing the cost of distributed advertising to merchants by offering 60 days free and a small $14.99 per month subscription fee thereafter;

Our primary sources of operating funds have been historically through the issuance of debt and equity. During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, we raised $~~110~~160,000 from the exercise of ~~options~~derivatives and a convertible promissory ~~note~~notes in the amount of $5075,000 and $6085,000, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2011 we raised $395,000 from the exercise of warrants and options. For the year ended December 31, 2010 we raised $50,000 from the sale of a warrant, $100,000 from the sale of common stock and $139,500 in debt. To finance our growth strategy, we continue to actively pursue additional funds through equity financing, including the sale of additional shares of common and debt financing, or a combination thereof.

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, iTrackr Systems had current assets of $~~194~~189,~~309~~446, including cash on hand of $4665,~~333~~535 and accounts receivable of $~~137~~115,~~852~~524 ofcompared ~~which~~to ~~$94,000~~accounts ~~has~~payable ~~been~~and ~~collected~~accrued asexpenses of ~~the date of this report~~$443,608. During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, the Company had revenue of $~~138~~290,~~247,~~955 and net losses of $~~474~~775,~~045~~077, including $373,678 of non cash expense related to depreciation, amortization and stock compensation. iTrackr has incurred losses since inception and may not be able to generate sufficient net revenue from its business in the future to achieve or sustain profitability. The Company believes that its cash on hand is insufficient to continue operations for the next twelve months. On July 12, 2011, the Company purchased RespondQ, LLC. With the purchase of RespondQ and subsequent improvements made to the related product offerings, the Company anticipates improved financial performance and increases in sales. In the near term, we expect that the cash on hand and accounts receivable totaling $~~184~~181,~~185~~059 will be sufficient to cover approximately 3-4 months of operations. Management is working to secure additional sales and debt and equity financing.

Impact of Inflation

General inflation in the economy has driven the operating expenses of many businesses higher, and, accordingly we have experienced increased salaries and higher prices for supplies, goods and services. We continuously seek methods of reducing costs and streamlining operations while maximizing efficiency through improved internal operating procedures and controls. While we are subject to inflation as described above, our management believes that inflation currently does not have a material effect on our operating results. However, inflation may become a factor in the future.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that have a significant impact on the results that we report in our consolidated financial statements. Some of our accounting policies require us to make difficult and subjective judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates regarding matters that are inherently uncertain Note B of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements describes the significant accounting policies used in the preparation of the financial statements. Certain of these significant accounting policies require us to make critical accounting estimates, as defined below.

A critical accounting estimate is defined as one that is both material to the presentation of our financial statements and requires management to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments that could have a material effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Specifically, critical accounting estimates have the following attributes:

·	we are required to make assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time of the estimate; and

·	different estimates we could reasonably have used, or changes in the estimate that are reasonably likely to occur, would have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Estimates and assumptions about future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions believed to be applicable and reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates may change as new events occur, as additional information is obtained and as our operating environment changes. These changes have historically been minor and have been included in the consolidated financial statements as soon as they became known. Based on a critical assessment of our accounting policies and the underlying judgments and uncertainties affecting the application of those policies, management believes that our financial statements are fairly stated in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, and present a meaningful presentation of our financial condition and results of operations.

Our most critical accounting estimates include:

·	the valuation of stock-based compensation, which impacts our operating expenses;

·	the assessment of recoverability of long-lived assets and goodwill, which impacts operating expenses when we record impairments or accelerate depreciation; and

·	the recognition and measurement of current and deferred income taxes, which impact our provision for taxes.

Below, we discuss these policies further, as well as the estimates and judgments involved.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for all compensation related to stock, options and warrants using a fair value based method whereby compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the value of the award and is recognized over the service period, which is usually the vesting period. We use the Black-Scholes pricing model to calculate the fair value of options and warrants issued to both employees and non-employees.

In calculating this fair value, there are certain assumptions that we use consisting of:

The expected life of the option. No incentive stock options have been granted to date. In the event the Company issues employee options, we will base our determination of expected life on the guidance in ASC 718-10-55-29 to 34. The Company utilizes the contract term of each non qualified option except in the event that the option is not transferrable in which case we apply the aforementioned guidance in determining the expected term.

2)	Risk-free interest rate. We use the treasury bill rate that most closely aligns with the duration of the derivative.

3)	Dividend yield. Until a dividend is offered this input will always be zero.

4)	Volatility. Due to the short amount of time the Company's stock has traded, we use the Dow Jones Internet Composite Index (Ticker: FDN) from inception of the index to the date of grant as a proxy for volatility.

5)	Forfeiture rate. To date this rate has been zero.

6)	Stock price. As quoted on the OTC QB Tier.

The use of a different estimate for any one of these components could have a material impact on the amount of calculated compensation expense.

We periodically issue common stock as compensation. Pursuant to ASC 505-50-30-6 issuances are valued using the market price of the stock or value of the services rendered on the date of the related agreement, whichever is more readily determinable. To date, common stock granted and issued for services has been issued free of obligation to the recipient and for no consideration.

Long-lived Assets

Long-lived assets, comprised of equipment, and identifiable intangible assets, are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors that may cause an impairment review include significant changes in technology that make current computer-related assets that we use in our operations obsolete or less useful and significant changes in the way we use these assets in our operations. When evaluating long-lived assets for potential impairment, we first compare the carrying value of the asset to the asset’s estimated future cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges). If the estimated future cash flows are less than the carrying value of the asset, we calculate an impairment loss. The impairment loss calculation compares the carrying value of the asset to the asset’s estimated fair value, which may be based on estimated future cash flows (discounted and with interest charges). We recognize an impairment loss if the amount of the asset’s carrying value exceeds the asset’s estimated fair value. If we recognize an impairment loss, the adjusted carrying amount of the asset becomes its new cost basis. The new cost basis will be depreciated (amortized) over the remaining useful life of that asset. Using the impairment evaluation methodology described herein, there have been no long-lived asset impairment charges for each of the last two years.

Our impairment loss calculations contain uncertainties because they require management to make assumptions and to apply judgment to estimate future cash flows and asset fair values, including forecasting useful lives of the assets and selecting the discount rate that reflects the risk inherent in future cash flows.

We have not made any material changes in our impairment loss assessment methodology during the past two fiscal years. We do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the estimates or assumptions we use to calculate long-lived asset impairment losses. However, if actual results are not consistent with our estimates and assumptions used in estimating future cash flows and asset fair values, we may be exposed to losses that could be material.

Goodwill

Goodwill is no longer amortized, but evaluated for impairment annually, or immediately if conditions indicate that impairment could exist. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of current financial assets, property and equipment, and separately reportable intangible assets. The tangible assets, intangible assets, and goodwill acquired are then assigned to reporting units. Goodwill is then tested for impairment at least annually for each reporting unit. Step one of the goodwill impairment test involves comparing the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying value. If the fair value exceeds the carrying value, no further testing is required. If the carrying value exceeds the fair value, a step two test must be performed. Step two includes estimating the fair value of all tangible and intangible assets for the reporting unit. The fair value of goodwill is then estimated by subtracting the fair value of tangible and intangible assets from the fair value of the reporting unit total assets determined in step one. The goodwill impairment is the excess of the recorded goodwill over the estimated fair value of goodwill.

We acknowledge the uncertainty surrounding the key assumptions that drive the estimated fair value. Any material negative change in the fundamental outlook of our business, our industry or the capital market environment could cause the reporting unit to fail step one. Accordingly, we will be monitoring events and circumstances each quarter (prior to the annual testing date) to determine whether an additional goodwill impairment test should be performed.

Income Taxes

Provisions for income taxes are based on taxes payable or refundable for the current period and deferred taxes on temporary differences between the amount of taxable income and pretax financial income and between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts in the financial statements. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are included in the financial statements at currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to be realized or settled.

When accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, first, the tax position is evaluated to determine the likelihood that it will be sustained upon external examination. If the tax position is deemed “more-likely-than-not” to be sustained, the tax position is then assessed to determine the amount of benefit to recognize in the financial statements. The amount of the benefit that may be recognized is the largest amount that has a greater than 50 percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. The Company ~~underwent a change of control for income tax purposes on October 8, 2003 according to Section 381 of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company~~’s utilization of U.S. Federal net operating losses will be limited in accordance to Section 381 rules. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

Results of Operations

Three and Six Months Ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 Compared With the Three and Six Months Ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011.

Revenues

Our sales revenue represents the amounts charged to our customers on a monthly basis pursuant to contractual arrangements. Revenues for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 were $~~138~~152,~~247~~708 compared to revenues of $46,~~250~~826 for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011. ~~The~~Revenues ~~$91,997~~for orthe ~~198.9%~~six ~~increase~~months inended ~~revenue~~June ~~is primarily due to the purchase of RespondQ~~30, ~~LLC~~2012 onwere ~~July 12~~$290,955 ~~2011~~compared ~~and~~to ~~related~~revenues ~~sales.~~of ~~Our~~$93,076 ~~sales~~for ~~revenue represents~~ the ~~amounts~~six ~~charged~~months toended ~~our~~June ~~customers~~30, ~~on a monthly basis pursuant to contractual arrangements~~2011. The ~~During~~$105,882 ~~The~~or 226% three ~~months~~month ~~ended~~increase ~~March~~and 31$197,879 ~~2012,~~or ~~two~~213% ~~customers~~six ~~accounted~~month ~~for~~increase ~~90%~~in ~~(64%~~revenue ~~and~~is ~~26%)~~primarily ofdue ~~sales compared~~ to the ~~three~~purchase ~~months~~of ~~ended March 31~~RespondQ, ~~2010~~LLC ~~where~~on ~~one~~July ~~customer~~12, ~~RespondQ,~~2011 ~~LLC~~and ~~accounted~~related ~~for 95.9% of~~ sales.

Cost of Revenue

During the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, cost of revenue was $8385,~~844~~947 or ~~60.6~~56% of revenue resulting in a gross margin of 3944%.4 During the six months ended June 30, 2012, cost of revenue was $169,791 or 58% of revenue resulting in a gross margin of 42%. Cost of revenue consists of amounts owed to KG Information Systems Private Ltd. ("KG") pursuant to services performed under a Master Services Agreement ("MSA") dated January 1, 2011 between KG and RespondQ. The MSA automatically renews on December 31, 2013 for successive 30 day periods. KG is a Business Process Outsource company ("BPO"). Under the MSA, KG is responsible for supplying the chat agents and tracking certain metrics related to the live chat sessions of our customers. KG sales agents primary goal is to initiate communications with website visitors through chat sessions on our customers websites and facilitate the close of a sale. The amount earned by KG is based on the number of sales of certain products made in a given month and to a lesser extent KG earns fees on a time and materials basis based on agent hours worked in a given month.

Operating Expenses

Selling, General and Administrative. Our selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses consist of compensation and related expenses for sales, executive, accounting, legal and administrative personnel, as well as office, phone, rent, postage, banking and related overhead. SG&A expenses ~~increased~~decreased by $862,~~971~~007 to $112,470 orduring ~~77.5%~~the three months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $~~199~~114,~~260~~477 during the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011. SG&A expenses increased by $84,964 to $311,730 during the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $~~112~~226,~~289~~ 766 during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011. ~~This~~The six month increase is primarily attributable to increases in personnel and professional fees resulting from increased sales and administrative activities.

Operations. Operations costs consist of costs related to compensation of internal and external network support staff, the cost of supporting our servers and network infrastructure as well as allocated occupancy costs and related overhead. Operations expenses increased to $4750,~~623~~836 during the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 compared to $0 during the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011. ~~This~~Operations expenses increased to $98,459 during the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $0 during the six months ended June 30, 2011. The increase is primarily attributable to an increase in website and related server hosting, licensing and network personnel costs.

Product Development. Our product development expenses consist primarily of compensation and related expenses for internal and external product development personnel and related costs. Product development expenses ~~increased~~decreased by $93,~~147~~999 to $5841,~~798~~201 during the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 compared to $4945,~~651~~200 during the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011. Product development expenses increased by $5,148 to $99,999 during the six months ended June 30, 2012 compared to $94,851 during the six months ended June 30, 2011. The six month increase is primarily attributable to development of ~~the~~ iTrackr.com whereas the 3 month year-over-year quarterly decrease reflects the transition of the Company's products from development to commercialization.

Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense ~~was $154,371 and $8,695~~ during the three and six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and 2011, ~~respectively~~was as follows:

	March 31,
	Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
	2012		2011		2012		2011
Amortization	$	143,~~502~~500	$	-	$	287,002	$	-
Depreciation		1011,~~869~~172		8,~~695~~551		22,041		17,246
	$	154,~~371~~672	$	8,~~695~~551	$	309,043	$	17,246

Amortization relates to acquisition costs recorded as a result of our acquisition of RespondQ, LLC in July 2011 (See NOTE D - GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS to our financial statements for additional disclosure).

Nonoperating Income and (Expense)

During the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and 2011, interest expense totaled $8,~~396~~614 and $5,~~445~~506, respectively. ~~Interest~~During ~~expense during~~ the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 ~~increased~~and $22011,~~951~~ ~~compared~~interest toexpense ~~the~~totaled ~~same~~$17,010 ~~period~~and of$10,951, ~~2011~~respectively. Interest expense increased due to higher average loan balances outstanding ~~during~~in ~~2011~~2012 compared to ~~2010~~2011. Additionally, during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 the Company recognized $60,000 of expense related to the beneficial conversion feature contained in the January 9, 2012 convertible promissory note (See NOTE F – NOTES to our financial statements for additional disclosure).

Net Loss and Net Loss per Share

During the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and 2011, our net loss totaled $~~474~~301,~~045~~032 and $~~129~~126,~~830~~908, respectively resulting in a net loss per share of $0.0201 and $0.01, ~~during~~respectively. During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 and 2011, our net loss totaled $775,077 and $256,738, respectively resulting in a net loss per share of $0.03 and $0.01, respectively. Common stock equivalents and outstanding options and warrants were not included in the calculations due to their being anti-dilutive.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our available working capital and capital requirements will depend upon numerous factors, including the sale of live chat services, the timing and cost of expanding into new markets, the cost of developing competitive technologies, the resources that we devote to developing new products and commercializing capabilities, the status of our competitors, our ability to establish collaborative arrangements with other organizations, and our ability to attract and retain key employees.

From inception to ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, we have incurred an accumulated deficit of $5,~~446~~747,~~741~~773. This loss has been incurred through a combination of stock compensation of $1,~~194~~198,~~016~~651, professional fees and expenses supporting our plans to develop our business and brand our services as well as continued operating losses.

At ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, iTrackr Systems had current assets of $~~194~~189,~~309~~446, including cash on hand of $4665,~~333~~535 and accounts receivable of $~~137~~115,~~852~~524 compared to accounts payable and accrued expenses of $~~361~~443,~~755~~608. During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, the Company had revenue of $~~138~~290,~~247~~955 and net losses of $~~474~~775,~~045~~077, including $373,678 of non cash expense related to depreciation, amortization and stock compensation. iTrackr has incurred losses since inception and may not be able to generate sufficient net revenue from its business in the future to achieve or sustain profitability. The Company believes that its cash on hand is insufficient to continue operations for the next twelve months. On July 12, 2011, the Company purchased RespondQ, LLC. With the purchase of RespondQ and subsequent improvements made to the related product offerings, the Company anticipates improved financial performance and increases in sales. In the near term, we expect that the cash on hand and accounts receivable totaling $~~184~~181,~~185~~059 will be sufficient to cover approximately 3-4 months of operations. Management is working to secure additional sales and debt and equity financing.

Net cash used by operating activities was $~~193~~220,~~806~~999 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 as compared to $881,~~766~~754 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011.

NoNet cash ~~was provided or~~ used byfor investing activities was $3,605 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 oras compared to $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2011.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $~~110~~160,000 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012 as compared to $0175,000 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2011.

~~During the three months ended March 31, 2012, iTrackr Systems, Inc.:~~18

During the six months ended June 30, 2012, iTrackr Systems, Inc.:

·	Received $50,000 upon the exercise of options to purchase 500,000 shares of restricted common stock.

·	Received $25,000 upon the exercise of warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of restricted common stock.

·	Committed to issue 30,000 shares to our interim CEO in exchange for services valued at $4,635.

During the year ended December 31, 2011, iTrackr Systems, Inc.:

·	Received $315,000 upon the exercise of warrants to purchase 1,400,000 shares of restricted common stock;

·	Received $80,000 upon the exercise of stock options to purchase 800,000 shares of restricted common stock;

·	Converted $60,904 of notes payable and accrued interest into 243,616 shares of restricted common stock;

·	Issued 100,000 shares in exchange for services valued at $43,350; and

·	Issued 5,000,000 shares in conjunctions with the purchase of RespondQ, LLC.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no material off-balance sheet transactions.

18Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

~~ITEM~~Not 3applicable. ~~QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.~~

~~ITEM~~Item 4. ~~CONTROLS~~ Controls ~~AND~~and ~~PROCEDURES~~Procedures.

~~ITEM~~Disclosure ~~4(T). CONTROLS~~Controls ~~AND~~and ~~PROCEDURES.~~Procedures

~~Evaluation~~Under the supervision and with the participation of ~~Disclosure~~our ~~Controls~~management, including our Chief Executive Officer and ~~Procedures~~Chief Financial Officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), as of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report. Based on this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of the date of this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective such that the information required to be disclosed in our United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

AsInternal ofControl ~~March~~over ~~31, 2012, under the direction of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief~~ Financial Officer, the Company evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a — 15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on the evaluation of these controls and procedures required by paragraph (b) of Sec. 240.13a-15 or 240.15d-15 the disclosure controls and procedures have been found to be ineffective.Reporting

~~The~~During ~~Company~~the ~~maintains~~period acovered ~~set~~by ofthis ~~disclosure~~report, ~~controls~~the ~~and~~Company ~~procedures~~hired ~~designed~~an toexperienced ~~ensure~~financial ~~that~~reporting ~~information~~professional ~~required~~as toCFO bethereby ~~disclosed~~increasing ~~by us in our reports filed under~~ the ~~securities~~number ~~Exchange~~of ~~Act,~~personnel isinvolved ~~recorded,~~in ~~processed, summarized, and reported within~~ the ~~time periods specified by the SEC~~Company’s ~~rules~~preparation and ~~forms. Disclosure~~review ~~controls~~of ~~are also designed with~~ the ~~objective~~Company’s offinancial ~~ensuring~~statements ~~that~~and ~~this information~~ is ~~accumulated~~reasonably ~~and~~likely ~~communicated~~ to ~~our~~materially ~~management,~~affect ~~including~~internal ~~our~~control ~~Chief~~over ~~Executive~~financial ~~Officer~~reporting ~~and~~(as ~~Chief~~defined ~~Financial~~in ~~Officer,~~Rules as13a-15(f) ~~appropriate,~~and to15d-15(f) ~~allow~~under ~~timely~~the ~~decisions~~Exchange ~~regarding required disclosure~~Act).

Evaluation of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of March 31, 2012. In making this assessment, management used the criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, or COSO. The COSO framework summarizes each of the components of a company’s internal control system, including (i) the control environment, (ii) risk assessment, (iii) control activities, (iv) information and communication, and (v) monitoring. In management’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f)) as required by Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(c), our management concluded as of the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, due to a lack of segregation of duties that our internal control over financial reporting has not been effective. However, at this time, our resources and size prevent us from being able to employ sufficient resources to enable us to have adequate segregation of duties within our internal control system. Management will periodically reevaluate this situation. If the volume of business increases and sufficient capital is secured, it is the Company’s intention to further increase staffing to mitigate the current lack of segregation of duties within the general, administrative and financial functions.

Our Board of Directors were advised by Bedinger and Company, our independent registered public accounting firm, that during their performance of audit procedures for the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, they have identified a material weakness as defined in Public Accounting Oversight Board Standard No. 5 in our internal control over financial reporting. Our auditors have identified the following material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011:

A material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting exists in that there is limited segregation of duties amongst the Company’s employees with respect to the Company’s preparation and review of the Company’s financial statements. This material weakness is a result of the Company’s limited number of employees. This material weakness may affect management’s ability to effectively review and analyze elements of the financial statement closing process and prepare financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this prospectus.

Changes in Internal Controls

Management of the Company has evaluated, with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the three months ended March 31, 2012. There was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in that evaluation that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, other than what has been reported above.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls and Other Matters

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls may be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control.

The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, a control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Risk Factor Related to Controls and Procedures

The Company has limited segregation of duties amongst its employees with respect to the Company’s preparation and review of the Company’s financial statements due to the limited number of employees, which is a material weakness in internal controls, and if the Company fails to maintain an effective system of internal controls, it may not be able to accurately report its financial results or prevent fraud. As a result, current and potential stockholders could lose confidence in the Company’s financial reporting which could harm the trading price of the Company’s stock.

Management has found it necessary to limit the Company’s administrative staffing in order to conserve cash until the Company’s level of business activity increases. As a result, there is limited segregation of duties amongst the employees. The Company and its independent public accounting firm have identified this as a material weakness in the Company’s internal controls. The Company intends to remedy this material weakness by hiring additional employees and reallocating duties, including responsibilities for financial reporting, among the employees as soon as there are sufficient resources available. However, until such time, this material weakness will continue to exist.

PART II -- OTHER INFORMATION

~~ITEM~~Item 1. ~~LEGAL~~ Legal ~~PROCEEDINGS~~Proceedings.

Not applicable.

~~ITEM~~Item 1A1a. ~~RISK~~ Risk ~~FACTORS~~Factors.

Not applicable.

~~ITEM~~Item 2. ~~UNREGISTERED~~ Unregistered ~~SALES~~Sales OFof ~~EQUITY~~Equity ~~SECURITIES~~Securities ~~AND~~and ~~USE~~Use OFof ~~PROCEEDS~~Proceeds.

During the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2012, the company received $50,000 and issued 500,000 shares upon the exercise of an option; received $25,000 upon the exercise of warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of restricted common stock; and committed to issue 30,000 shares to our interim CEO in exchange for services valued at $4,635.

~~ITEM~~Item 3. ~~DEFAULTS~~ Defaults ~~UPON~~Upon ~~SENIOR~~Senior ~~SECURITIES~~Securities.

Related party note payable to Bluewater Advisors, Inc. a company wholly owned by John Rizzo, our former CEO; convertible into common stock (conversion price 50% below the previous 10 day average closing price) upon default, bears interest at 9% per year, Matured July 1, 2011 and is currently in default. The total due under this note is $233,697 including principle of $192,812 and accrued interest of $40,885.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

~~ITEM~~Item 45. ~~MINE~~ Other ~~SAFETY DISCLOSURES~~Information.

Not applicable.

~~ITEM~~Item 56. ~~OTHER INFORMATION~~ Exhibits.

Not applicable.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.

Exhibit No.		Identification of Exhibit

31.1*		Certification of Jacobo Melcer, Chief Executive Officer of iTrackr Systems, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2*		Certification of Justin Frere, Chief Financial Officer of iTrackr Systems, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1*		Certification of Jacobo Melcer, Chief Executive Officer of iTrackr Systems, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2*		Certification of Justin Frere, Chief Financial Officer of iTrackr Systems, Inc., pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

101.INS **		XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

101.CAL **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

101.DEF **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

101.LAB **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

101.PRE **		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

~~_____~~____________

* Filed Herewith

** XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

2220

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	ITRACKR SYSTEMS, INC.
Date: May 2, 2011	By:	/s/ Jacobo Melcer
Date: August 13, 2012	By:	/s/ Jacobo Melcer
		Jacobo Melcer
		Jacobo Melcer,
		Interim Chairman and
		Interim Chairman and Interim Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
		Interim Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
	By:	/s/ Justin Frere
		Justin Frere, )
		Justin Frere,
		Chief Financial Officer
		Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer)
		(Principal Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.21

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ Jacobo Melcer	Interim Chairman and Interim Chief Executive	May 2, 2012
Jacobo Melcer	Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Justin Frere	Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial	May 2, 2012
Justin Frere	,Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)

Filing Compare · ITRACKR SYSTEMS INC