UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

_________________

FORM 10-Q

_________________

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: June 30, 2013

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from: ______ to ______

_________________

OrGANIC ALLIANCE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

_________________

Nevada	000-51119	26-1997130
(State or Other Jurisdiction	(Commission	(I.R.S. Employer
of Incorporation or Organization)	File Number)	Identification No.)

401 Monterey Street, Suite 202 Salinas, CA 93901
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) (Zip Code)

(831)-240-0295
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

N/A
(Former name or former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

_________________

(Registrant’s telephone number)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o

Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class		Outstanding at September 4, 2013
Common stock, $0.0001 par value		18,473,554

ORGANIC ALLIANCE, INC.

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2013 (unaudited) and December 31, 2012	F-1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)	F-2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012 (unaudited)	F-3
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)	F-4
ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	3
ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	11
ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	11
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	12
ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALE OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	13
ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	13
ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS	13
SIGNATURES		14

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Organic Alliance Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet
	As of
	June 30, 2013			December 31, 2012
	(Unaudited)
Assets
Current assets:
Cash	$	—		$	159,346
Accounts receivable, net		38,578			211,288
Inventory		75,228			139,888
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		70,727			98,074
Total current assets		184,533			608,596

Total Assets	$	184,533		$	608,596

Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficiency

Current liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	1,485,457		$	993,240
Due to factor		146,980			213,778
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		1,851,815			1,734,863
Derivative liabilities		171,822			432,030
Notes payable to related parties and others, net of discounts		4,748,453			3,936,955
Total current liabilities		8,404,527			7,310,866

Commitments and contingencies

Stockholders' Deficiency:
Preferred stock, no stated value;
10,000,000 shares authorized; -0- shares issued
and outstanding as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012		—			—
Common stock, $.0001 par value, 100,000,000 shares
authorized, 18,473,554 and 17,795,376 shares issued and outstanding
as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively		1,848			1,780
Additional paid-in capital		14,256,305			13,872,597
Accumulated deficit		(22,478,147	)		(20,576,647	)
Total stockholders' deficiency		(8,219,994	)		(6,702,270	)

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficiency	$	184,533		$	608,596

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

F-1

Organic Alliance Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended						For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2013			June 30, 2012			June 30, 2013			June 30, 2012

Revenue	$	290,403		$	630,294		$	981,205		$	966,301
Cost of sales		247,285			570,557			861,180			873,420

Gross margin		43,118			59,737			120,025			92,881

General and administrative expenses		621,741			1,097,172			1,511,852			1,554,014

Operating loss		(578,623	)		(1,037,435	)		(1,391,827	)		(1,461,133	)

Other expense (income) :
Interest expense		289,890			576,951			803,067			805,821
Change in fair value of derivative liability		(80,694	)		1,719,679			(293,394	)		1,997,944
Total other expense (income)		209,196			2,296,630			509,673			2,803,765

Net loss	$	(787,819	)	$	(3,334,065	)	$	(1,901,500	)	$	(4,264,898	)

Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.19	)	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.25	)

Weighted average number of common
shares outstanding - basic and diluted		19,629,743			17,358,027			19,463,997			17,358,027

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

F-2

Organic Alliance Inc.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)


	For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2013			June 30, 2012

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(1,901,500	)	$	(4,264,898	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Common stock issued for services		55,000			—
Share-based compensation		298,989			626,785
Non-cash interest		353,629			69,257
Change in fair value of derivative liability		(293,394	)		1,997,944
Amortization on discount of note payable		403,442			514,252
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		172,710			(161,892	)
Inventory		64,660			(122,839	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		27,347			(17,166	)
Accounts payable		492,217			60,815
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities		115,988			194,245
Net cash used in operating activities		(210,912	)		(1,103,497	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from notes and loans payable		94,828			1,025,000
Principal payments on note payable		(11,000	)		(8,000	)
Cash overdraft		34,536			—
Net advances (repayments) from/to factor		(66,798	)		85,090
Net cash provided by financing activities		51,566			1,102,090

Net decrease in cash		(159,346	)		(1,407	)
Cash - beginning of the period		159,346			5,852
Cash - end of the period	$	—		$	4,445

Supplemental disclosures:
Interest paid	$	45,994		$	223,213

Supplemental disclosure for non-cash financing activities:
Discount on notes payable	$	29,401		$	832,359

Issuance of common stock to settle liability	$	33,572		$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

F-3

Organic Alliance, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

1.	NATURE OF BUSINESS

Organic Alliance, Inc. is a global grower and marketer of organic, Fair Trade and conventional fresh fruits and vegetables. By establishing collaborative relationships with key growers, the Company has built a vertically integrated supply chain that enables it to support its customers with an increasing variety of certified sustainable products, sensible pricing, steady supply and inspiring multi-media stories from our many producing communities.

History - NB Design & Licensing, Inc. (“NB Design”), a Nevada corporation, was organized in September 2001. Its former parent, New Bridge Products, Inc., incorporated in August 1995 as a manufacturer of minivans, filed a petition in bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Its Plan of Reorganization was approved by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Arizona in September 2002, and NB Design was discharged from bankruptcy in October 2002. NB Design was inactive from October 2002 to April 29, 2008.

Organic Alliance, Inc., a Texas corporation (“Organic Texas”) was organized on February 19, 2008 to sell organically grown fruits and vegetables. During the second quarter of 2009, it ceased being a development stage company when it commenced its operations.

On April 29, 2008, NB Design acquired all 10,916,917 issued and outstanding shares of common stock of Organic Texas for 464,999 shares of the NB Design’s common stock. Organic Texas thereupon became a wholly-owned subsidiary of NB Design. The business of Organic Texas is the only business of NB Design. The Company operates in California.

The acquisition of Organic Texas, a private operating company, by NB Design, a non-operating public shell corporation with nominal net assets, was accounted for as a reverse capitalization in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“SEC”) Division of Corporate Financial Reporting manual Topic 12 “Reverse Acquisition and Reverse Capitalization”. As such, the acquisition was treated as a capital transaction rather than a business combination, and no goodwill was recorded. NB Design was the legal acquirer because it issued its equity interests, and Organic Texas was the legal acquiree because its equity interests were acquired. However, NB Design was the acquiree and Organic Texas was the acquirer for accounting purposes. Organic Texas is treated as the continuing reporting entity that acquired the registrant, NB Design. The pre-acquisition financial statements of Organic Texas are treated as the historical financial statements of the consolidated companies.

On June 2, 2008, NB Design changed its name to Organic Alliance, Inc. On August 29, 2008, Organic Texas changed its name to Organic Texas, Inc. All references throughout this report to “Organic Alliance, Inc.” or the “Company” refers to Organic Alliance, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Organic Texas, except where the context makes clear that the reference is only to Organic Alliance, Inc.

2.	SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation - The Company's unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared on an accrual basis of accounting, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP) for interim financial information applicable for a going concern, which assumes that the Company will realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the ordinary course of the business, and in accordance with the instructions for Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Certain information and disclosures included in the financial statements prepared in accordance with US GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations.

In the opinion of management, the condensed consolidated financial statements contain all material adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the Company for the interim periods presented.

F-4

The results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations for the full year. These financial statements and related footnotes should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 13, 2013.

Use of Estimates - The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates that are particularly sensitive to change in the near term include, but are not limited to, realization of deferred tax assets, allowance for doubtful accounts, and assumptions used in derivative valuations and share based payment transactions. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Principles of Consolidation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Organic Alliance, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Organic Texas, Inc. (collectively, the “Company”). All significant inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts - An allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable is recorded based on a combination of aging analysis, past practices and any specific troubled accounts. The Company’s produce is sold to the Company’s customers for cash or on credit terms which are established in accordance with local and industry practices and typically require payment within 10 to 30 days of delivery. Accounts are written off when uncollectibility is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance account. The allowance for doubtful accounts amounted to $5,000 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

In addition, the Company factors its receivables with full recourse and, as a result, accounts for the factoring akin to a secured borrowing, maintaining the gross receivable asset and due to factor liability on its books and records. In connection with the factoring of its receivables, the Company estimates an allowance for factoring fees associated with the collections. These fees range from 3% to 5% depending on the actual timing of the collection. The actual recognition and amount of such fees may differ from the estimates depending upon the timing of collections.

Inventory - Inventory is stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market, and includes principally produce the Company purchases from growers ($0) and ($34,547) and packaging materials ($75,228) and ($105,341) as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The Company held $75,228 and $139,888 of inventory as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Income Taxes - The Company uses the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes”. Under this method, income tax expense is recognized for the amount of (i) taxes payable or refundable for the current year and (ii) deferred tax consequences of temporary differences resulting from matters that have been recognized in an entity’s financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided to reduce the deferred tax assets reported if based on the weight of the available positive and negative evidence, it is more likely than not some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments - The carrying amounts of financial instruments, including cash, receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximated fair value as of the balance sheet dates presented, because of the relatively short maturity dates on these instruments. The carrying amounts of the notes payable issued approximate fair value as of the balance sheet dates presented, because interest rates and other terms on these instruments approximate terms currently available on similar instruments.

Derivative Financial Instruments - The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market or foreign currency risks. The Company evaluates all of its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the statements of operations. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

F-5

The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that the Company record the conversion option and related warrants at their fair values as of the inception date of the agreements, and at fair value as of each subsequent balance sheet date. As a result of entering into the convertible notes, the Company is required to classify certain non-employee warrants as derivative liabilities and record them at their fair values at each balance sheet date. Any change in fair value was recorded as a change in the fair value of derivative liabilities for each reporting period at each balance sheet date. The Company reassesses the classification at each balance sheet date. If the classification changes as a result of events during the period, the contract is reclassified as of the date of the event that caused the reclassification.

The fair value of conversion options at a fixed number of shares are recorded using the intrinsic value method. Conversion options at variable rates and any options and warrants with ratchet provisions are deemed to contain a “down-round protection”. Accordingly, they do not meet the scope exception for treatment as a derivative under ASC 815 since “down-round protection” is not an input into the calculation of the fair value of the equity instruments and cannot be considered “indexed to the Company’s own stock”, which is a requirement for the scope exception as outlined under ASC 815.

The Company signed a convertible note and has determined that a conversion option is embedded in the note and it is required to bifurcate the conversion option from the host contract under ASC 815 and account for the derivatives at fair value. The estimated fair value of the conversion option was determined using the binomial model. The fair value of the conversion option will be classified as a liability until the debt is converted by the note holders or paid back by the Company. The fair value will be affected by changes in inputs to that model including our stock price, expected stock price volatility, the contractual term, and the risk-free interest rate. The Company will continue to classify the fair value of the conversion option as a liability until the conversion option is exercised, expires or is amended in a way that would no longer require these conversion options to be classified as a liability, whichever comes first. The Company has adopted a sequencing policy that reclassifies contracts (from equity to assets or liabilities) with the most recent inception date first. Thus any available shares are allocated first to contracts with the most recent inception dates.

For the binomial lattice options pricing model, the Company used the following assumptions and weighted average fair value ranges for the six months ended June 30:

	2013	2012
Risk-free interest rate	0.04%-0.66%	0.08%-0.72%
Dividend yield	N/A	N/A
Expected volatility	26.1%-56.0%	28.4%-55.0%
Expected life in months and years	3 months – 4.3 years	3 months – 4.3 years

Since the Company’s common is thinly traded, the expected volatility is based on the average historical stock volatility data for three similar public companies over the expected term of the derivative financial instrument.

Revenue Recognition - Revenue is recorded when (1) the customer accepts delivery of the product, title has been transferred, and the Company has no significant obligations remaining to be performed; (2) a final understanding as to specific nature and terms of the agreed upon transaction has occurred; (3) price is fixed and (4) collection is reasonably assured.

Share Based Compensation – The Company accounts for share-based compensation in accordance with the fair value recognition provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) No. 718. For employees and directors, the fair value of the award is measured on the grant date, and for non-employees the fair value of the award is generally re-measured on interim financial reporting dates until the service period is complete.

F-6

Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected life of the option, and such assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate. The fair value of share-based payment awards was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise and employee termination within the valuation model; separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. The expected term of options granted is derived from the output of the option valuation model and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant.

For the Black-Scholes pricing model, the Company used the following assumptions and weighted average fair value ranges for the six months ended June 30:

	2013	2012
Risk-free interest rate	0.34%-2.54%	0.43%-0.86%
Dividend yield	N/A	N/A
Expected volatility	34.7%-50.2%	39.3%-55.2%
Expected life in years	3-7	2.5-5

Concentrations

		Credit Risk - The Company maintains cash balances at various high quality federally insured financial institutions, with balances at times, in excess of federally insured limits. Management believes that the financial institutions that hold the Company’s deposits are financially sound and therefore pose a minimum credit risk. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts.

		Major customers - The Company has two and five major customers, which accounted for approximately 30% and 73% of the sales during the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. For the three months ended June 30, 2013, the total sales comprised of customer A 17% and customer B 13% compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012, comprised of customer D 19%, customer E 17%, customer F 14%, customer G 12% and customer H 11%. The Company has one and two major customers, which accounted for approximately 11% and 38% of the sales during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the total sales comprised of customer C 11% compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012, comprised of customer E 26% and customer D 12%. The loss of any of these customers could adversely affect the Company's operations.

		Major receivables - The Company has two major receivables at June 30, 2013 comprised of customer K 49% and customer L 33% compared to five major receivables at June 30, 2012, comprised of customer D 25%, customer G 24%, customer F 13%, customer I 10% and customer J 10%.

		Major suppliers - The Company has three major suppliers, which accounted for approximately 89% and 74% of purchases during three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company has four and two major suppliers, which accounted for approximately 74% and 44% of purchases during six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The loss of any of these suppliers could adversely affect the Company's operations.

Net Loss Per Share - Basic loss per share was computed using the weighted average number of outstanding common shares. Diluted loss per share includes the effect of dilutive common stock equivalents from the assumed exercise of options, warrants and convertible notes. Common stock equivalents were excluded in the computation of diluted loss per share since their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

In accordance with ASC 260 “Earnings per Share”, the Company has given effect to the issuance of warrants to purchase approximately 1,100,000 and 2,795,538 shares of the Company’s common stock as of June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, exercisable at $0.01. These warrants have been included in computing the basic net loss per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012. Additionally, included in the Company’s weighted average shares outstanding are 56,189 and 3,529,897 shares earned, but not issued, as at June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

F-7

Total common stock equivalents which were excluded (since their inclusion would be anti-dilutive) are those shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants, options and the conversion of convertible notes, as of June 30, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

	June 30,
	2013		2012
Options		7,717,896		4,058,750
Warrants		13,669,341		6,141,602
Convertible notes		29,070,363		5,194,529
Total Common stock equivalents		50,457,600		15,394,881

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not effective, accounting standards, if currently adopted, would have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

3	. GOING CONCERN

The condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable for a going concern, which assume that the Company will realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the ordinary course of business. As of June 30, 2013, the Company had limited cash, a working capital deficit of approximately $8,220,000 accumulated losses of approximately $22,478,000 since its inception, and has $309,067 of payroll tax liabilities inclusive of penalties and interest withheld from wages paid which have yet to be remitted to the taxing authorities and are delinquent. The Company currently is delinquent with its payroll tax filings since December 31, 2008; however, since April 1, 2012 the Company has been remitting payroll tax on a current basis. The Company ceased paying payroll beginning May 1, 2013. Most employees were furloughed or resigned by May 31, 2013. The Company plans to restart selling activities upon obtaining suitable financing. The Company’s accounts receivable are pledged per a factoring agreement. At June 30, 2013, the Company was not compliant with the repayments terms of various notes payable for an aggregate of approximately $4,652,000 including accrued interest. Its ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the ability of the Company to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and pay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due, and increasing its revenue in order to achieve profitable operations. The outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with any certainty at this time and raise substantial doubt that the Company will be able to continue as a going concern. These consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to the amounts and classification of assets and liabilities that may be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

The Company intends to overcome the circumstances that impact its ability to remain a going concern through a combination of growing high margin revenues, with interim cash flow deficiencies being addressed through additional equity and debt financing. The Company anticipates raising additional funds through public or private financing, strategic relationships or other arrangements in the near future to support its business operations; however the Company does not have commitments from third parties for a sufficient amount of additional capital, the Company cannot be certain that any such financing will be available on acceptable terms, or at all, and its failure to raise capital when needed could limit its ability to continue or resume its operations. The Company’s ability to obtain additional funding will determine its ability to continue as a going concern. Furthermore, additional equity financing may be dilutive to the holders of the Company’s common stock, and debt financing, if available, may involve restrictive covenants or may require that the Company relinquish valuable rights.

F-8

4	. DUE TO FACTOR

On November 1, 2010, the Company signed a one year agreement with a financial services company for the purchase and sale of accounts receivables which expired on October 31, 2011. The agreement is continuing on a month to month basis. The financial services company commenced funding during February 2011. The financial services company advances up to 80% of qualified customer invoices, less applicable discount fees, and holds the remaining 20% as a reserve until the customer pays the financial services company. The released reserves are used to fund other vendor purchases or returned to the Company. The Company is charged 3% for the first 30 days outstanding plus 1/10 of 1% daily for funds outstanding over 30 days. Uncollectable customer invoices are charged back to the Company. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012 the advances from the factor, inclusive of fees, amounted to $146,980 and $213,778, respectively. Advances from the factor are collateralized by substantially all assets of the Company.

5	. PREFERRED STOCK

The Company’s articles of incorporation authorize its Board of Directors to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series without stockholder approval. Each such series of preferred stock may have such number of shares, designations, preferences, voting powers, qualifications, and special or relative rights or privileges as are determined by The Company’s Board of Directors. At June 30, 2013 and December 31 2012, no shares of preferred stock were issued or outstanding.

6. EQUITY TRANSACTIONS

During March 2013, the Company issued 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to a consultant for investor and public relations services. The fair value of the award was fully vested on the date of issuance and accordingly the Company recorded a charge for stock based compensation of $55,000 or $0.11 per share in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of operations.

During June 2013, a consultant was granted a three-year warrant to purchase 250,000 shares of our Company’s common stock at $0.15 per share for accounting services to our Company. The warrant vests immediately.

7.	NOTES PAYABLE, LOANS AND DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES

Notes payable to related parties and others, net of discounts consist of the following:


	June 30,		December 31,
	2013		2012
	(unaudited)
Notes Payable (net of debt discount of $80 at June 30, 2013 and $133,827 at December 31, 2012) (A)	$	2,877,601	$	2,512,753
Notes Payable – Related Parties (net of debt discount of $47,673 at December 31, 2012) (B)		644,446		509,696
Convertible Notes Payable (net of debt discount of $24,914 at June 30, 2013 and $217,535 at December 31, 2012) (C)		1,226,406		914,506
Totals	$	4,748,453	$	3,936,955

F-9

(A)

Notes Payable

i. In May 2010, an individual advanced to the Company $20,000 bearing interest at 6% per annum. As a financing incentive, the individual received a warrant to purchase 20,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $1.00 per share. The warrants expired in November 2011. The gross proceeds of the note were recorded net of a debt discount of $9,200. The debt discount consisted of the relative fair value of the warrant of $9,200 and is accreted to interest expense ratably over the term of the note. The promissory note matured on November 17, 2011. The unpaid balance, including accrued interest, was $23,641 and $23,046 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The Company is not compliant with the repayment terms of the note.

ii. On February 3, 2011, the Company signed a $500,000 promissory note with a maturity date of August 2, 2012, and has a stated interest rate of 15% per annum. As a financing incentive, the lender received a three-year warrant vesting on January 31, 2011, to purchase 452,354 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share, and also received a five-year warrant, vesting on June 30, 2011, to purchase 452,354 shares at an exercise price of $0.01 per share. The gross proceeds from the sale of the note of $500,000 were recorded net of a discount of $137,703. The debt discount consisted of $137,703 related to the fair value of the warrants and is accreted to interest expense ratably over the term of the note which amounted to $63,114 for the year ended December 31, 2012. The Company has not made any note payments and received a waiver from the lender on September 1, 2011 that deferred payment until September 1, 2012 and increased the interest rate to 21% beginning April 4, 2011, the date of the first event of default. The unpaid balance, including accrued interest, was $750,603 and $698,534 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The Company is not compliant with the repayment terms of the note.

iii. On August 1, 2012, the Company issued a $60,000 promissory note with an original issue discount of 20%. The promissory note is due on the earlier of (i) the closing by the Company of a financing or series of financings for aggregate cash proceeds of at least $1,850,000, or, (ii) July 31, 2013. As a financing incentive, the lender received a three-year warrant, vesting immediately, to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share. The gross proceeds from the sale of the note of $60,000 were recorded net of a discount of $11,088. The debt discount consisted of $11,088 related to the fair value of the warrant and is accreted to interest expense ratably over the term of the note which amounted to $11,088 for the year ended December 31, 2012. Since the Company satisfied the requirement of item (i) and raised $1,875,000 after August 1, 2012, the discount was recognized over the shorter maturity term. The carrying value of the unpaid balance was $60,000 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The Company is not compliant with the repayment terms of the note.

iv. On August 7, 2012, the Company issued a $30,000 promissory note with an original issue discount of 20%. The promissory note is due on the earlier of (i) the closing by the Company of a financing or series of financings for aggregate cash proceeds of at least $1,850,000, or, (ii) August 6, 2013. As a financing incentive, the lender received a three-year warrant, vesting immediately, to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share. The gross proceeds from the sale of the note of $30,000 were recorded net of a discount of $3,406. The debt discount consisted of $3,406 related to the fair value of the warrant and is accreted to interest expense ratably over the term of the note which amounted to $3,406 for the year ended December 31, 2012. Since the Company satisfied the requirement of item (i) and raised $1,875,000 after August 7, 2012, the discount was recognized over the shorter maturity term. The carrying value of the unpaid balance was $30,000 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The Company is not compliant with the repayment terms of the note.

F-10

v. On August 22, 2012, the Company issued a $60,000 promissory note with an original issue discount of 20%. The promissory note is due on the earlier of (i) the closing by the Company of a financing or series of financings for aggregate cash proceeds of at least $1,850,000, or, (ii) August 21, 2013. As a financing incentive, the lender received a three-year warrant, vesting immediately, to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share. The gross proceeds from the sale of the note of $60,000 were recorded net of a discount of $9,495. The debt discount consisted of $9,495 related to the fair value of the warrant and is accreted to interest expense ratably over the term of the note which amounted to $9,495 for the year ended December 31, 2012. Since the Company satisfied the requirement of item (i) and raised $1,875,000 after August 22, 2012, the discount was recognized over the shorter maturity term. The carrying value of the unpaid balance was $60,000 June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The Company is not compliant with the repayment terms of the note.

vi. In December 2012, the Company commenced an offering of secured promissory notes for an aggregate principal amount of $2,500,000 with three-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 5,000,000 shares our common stock (two shares for each $1 of the principal amount of the notes purchased) exercisable at $0.50 per share. The notes bear interest at 18% and have a maturity date of June 30, 2013. Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $1,000,000 and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,000,000 common shares were sold in the offering. In addition, the investment banker who facilitated the sale of the notes and warrants received a three-year warrant to purchase 200,000 shares of our common stock (10% of the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants sold in the offering) exercisable at $0.50 per share. The fair value of the three-year warrants issued in connection with the notes on the date of issuance aggregated $32,202, and was recorded as debt discount. The debt discount was amortized through the term of the notes and amounted to $14,129 and $28,258 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively. The unpaid balance, including accrued interest, was $1,089,260 and $1,000,000 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The Company is not compliant with the repayment terms of the note.

vii. On May 8, 2013, the Company issued a $30,000 promissory note with an original issue discount of 20%. The promissory note is due on the earlier of (i) the closing by the Company of a financing or series of financings for aggregate cash proceeds of at least $1,850,000, or, (ii) July 5, 2013. As a financing incentive, the lender received a three-year warrant, vesting immediately, to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.10 per share. The gross proceeds from the sale of the note of $30,000 were recorded net of a discount of $928. The debt discount consisted of $928 related to the fair value of the warrant and is accreted to interest expense ratably over the term of the note which amounted to $848 for the three months ended June 30, 2013. The Company repaid $10,000 during May and June 2013. The carrying value of the unpaid balance was $20,000 at June 30, 2013. The Company is not compliant with the repayment terms of the note.

(B)

Notes Payable – Related Parties

i. In September 2008, Earnest Mathis, a former shareholder, advanced to the Company $15,000. The advance is evidenced by a promissory note bearing interest at 10% per annum. The promissory note matured on September 13, 2009. The unpaid balance, including accrued interest, was $22,190 and $21,446 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The Company is not compliant with the repayment terms of the note.

ii. In November 2009 and February 2010, Morrison Partners, LLC (an affiliate of Thomas Morrison, former CEO and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company), advanced to the Company $10,000 and $15,000, respectively. The advances are evidenced by promissory notes bearing interest at 5% per annum. The November advance provides for the issuance of 2,770 shares of the Company’s common stock as a financing incentive. The Company recorded a debt discount of $2,935 for the relative fair value of the common stock. The discount was accreted over the life of the note.

The November 2009 and February 2010 notes were due on June 30, 2010 and September 30, 2010, respectively. The unpaid balance, including accrued interest, was $29,346 and $28,726 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The shares have not been issued to Morrison Partners, LLC, and the Company is not in compliance with the repayment terms of the notes.

F-11

iii. During March, 2010 through October 2011, an employee of the Company loaned to the Company $65,958, of which $16,000 and $49,958 was advanced during 2011 and 2010, respectively. The loans are evidenced by promissory notes payable with interest at 5% and are due on demand. The Company repaid $9,000 during 2010 and $8,000 during April 2012. In addition, the employee will be issued 47,690 shares of the Company’s common stock upon repayment of the promissory notes as additional consideration. The Company will record a fair value for these shares on the measurement date as a charge to interest expense. The unpaid balance, including accrued interest, was $55,764 and $54,551 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

iv. On October 17, 2011, the Company entered into a $400,000 convertible multi-draw term loan facility with an entity owned by a related party. The loan bears interest at 21% and has a maturity date of the earlier of an event of default or April 17, 2012. The Company has not made a note payment and is currently negotiating an extension of such loan. At the time of any new debt or equity financing of the Company, the loan balance, including principal and interest, may be converted into the number of fully paid and non-assessable debt instruments, shares/or units to be issued in the financing. In addition, with each drawdown the related party received a three-year warrant to purchase 2.5 shares of the Company’s common stock for each $1.00 of principal loaned at such time, up to 1,000,000 shares in the aggregate for all drawdowns. Each warrant has an exercise price of $0.10 per share, is vested upon issuance, and expires on October 17, 2014. The Company received $125,000 and $275,000 in gross proceeds during the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The Company issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 312,500 and 687,500 shares of the Company’s common stock during the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. The unpaid balance of the loan, including accrued interest, was $441,655 and $400,000 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The Company is not compliant with the repayment terms of the note.

The conversion price of the outstanding loan amounts was not fixed and determinable on the date of issuance and, as such in accordance with ASC Topic 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”), the embedded conversion option on the date of issuance was valued using the binomial lattice options pricing model and recorded as derivative liabilities. The fair value of the three-year warrants on the date of issuance aggregated $105,363, and was recorded as debt discount. The debt discount was fully amortized through the term of the loan and amounted to $45,280 and $85,342 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.

During December 2012 the Company amended the notes to remove the conversion right and extend the due date to June 30, 2013, and to amend the warrants to remove certain anti-dilution provisions. For executing the agreement, the holder was granted a three-year warrant to purchase 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, equal to two and one-half times the principal amount of the note amended, exercisable at $0.20 per share. The Company evaluated the change in cash flows in connection with the December amendment and determined that there was a greater than 10% change between the present value of the existing debt and the amended debt. As a result, the fair value of the three-year warrants aggregated $49,439 and were recorded as a discount to the modified debt and will be accreted over the remaining term of the modified debt and recognized as interest expense. The debt discount on the modified debt amounted to $21,188 and $42,376 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.

v. On February 28, 2012, Michael Rosenthal, Chairman of the Company’s Board of Directors, advanced the Company $50,000. The advance is evidenced by a promissory note bearing interest at 21% and has a maturity date of the earlier of an event of default or August 28, 2012. In addition, Mr. Rosenthal received a three-year warrant to purchase 125,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.10 per share. The Company recorded a debt discount of $7,997 to the face value of the note based upon the fair values of the warrants. The discount was being accreted over the life of the note which amounted to $3,999 and $5,405 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively. The unpaid balance, including accrued interest, was $57,853 and $52,647 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The Company is not compliant with the repayment terms of the note.

F-12

During December 2012 the Company amended the note to extend the due date to June 30, 2013. For executing the agreement, the holder was granted a three-year warrant to purchase 125,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, equal to two and one-half times the principal amount of the note amended, exercisable at $0.20 per share. The Company evaluated the change in cash flows in connection with the December amendment and determined that there was a greater than 10% change between the present value of the existing debt and the amended debt. As a result, the fair value of the three-year warrants aggregated $6,180 and were recorded as a discount to the modified debt and will be accreted over the remaining term of the modified debt and recognized as interest expense. The debt discount on the modified debt amounted to $2,649 and $5,298 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.

vi. During April 2013 and June 2013, Barry Brookstein, CFO, loaned to the Company $37,050. The loan is evidenced by a promissory note payable with interest at 18% and is due on demand. The unpaid balance, including accrued interest, was $37,638 at June 30, 2013.

i. On July 30, 2010, an individual advanced the Company $8,000. The advance is evidenced by a promissory note bearing interest at 6% per annum and maturing on March 2, 2011. The holder, at any time, may convert the promissory note into shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.05 per share. The Company calculated the fair value of the beneficial conversion feature using the Black-Scholes pricing model on the date of issuance. The fair value of the conversion option in connection with the note on the date of issuance aggregated $8,000, and was recorded as debt discount. The debt discount was amortized through the term of the note. The unpaid balance, including accrued interest, was $9,402 and $9,164 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The Company is not compliant with the repayment terms of the note.

ii. On April 28, 2011, the Company issued a $70,588 convertible promissory note with an original issue discount of 15%. The convertible promissory note has a maturity date of the earlier of (i) the Company raising debt or equity financing of $600,000 or more, or (ii) May 31, 2011. The note may be converted into the Company’s common stock by the holder at $0.05 per share. As a financing incentive, the lender received a five-year warrant, vesting April 28, 2011, to purchase 705,882 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 per share. The Company has not made a note payment, and the Company received a waiver from the lender on September 1, 2011 that defers payment until May 31, 2012 and waives the provision for payment upon the Company’s closing a debt or equity financing of $600,000 or more. The unpaid balance on the note was $70,588 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The Company is not compliant with the repayment terms of the note.

The conversion price of the note and five-year warrants was not fixed and determinable on the date of issuance and as such in accordance with ASC Topic 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”), the embedded conversion options of the note and warrants on the date of issuance were valued using the binomial lattice options pricing model and recorded as derivative liabilities. The fair value of the conversion option and five-year warrants issued in connection with the note on the date of issuance aggregated $60,000, and were recorded as debt discount. The debt discount was amortized through the term of the note.

During December 2012 the Company amended the note to remove the conversion right and extend the due date to June 30, 2013, and to amend the warrants to remove certain anti-dilution provisions. For executing the agreement, the holder was granted a three-year warrant to purchase 61,856 shares of the Company’s common stock, exercisable at $0.18 per share. The Company evaluated the change in cash flows in connection with the December amendment and determined that there was a less than 10% change between the present value of the existing debt and the amended debt. As a result, the fair value of the new three-year warrants of $4,923 was expensed on the date of the amendment.

F-13

iii. On July 15, 2011, the Company issued a $109,822 convertible promissory note with an original issue discount of 15% that consolidated various demand notes from September 2010 through July 2011. The convertible promissory note has a maturity date of the earlier of (i) the Company raising debt or equity financing of $600,000 or more, or (ii) August 31, 2011. The loan holder advanced an additional $1,750 in September 2011. The note may be converted into the Company’s common stock by the holder at $0.05 per share. As a financing incentive, the lender received a five-year warrant, vesting July 15, 2011, to purchase 1,098,220 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 per share. The Company repaid $1,784 during 2012. The unpaid balance was $109,789 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012. The Company is not compliant with the repayment terms of the note.

The conversion price of the note and five-year warrants were not fixed and determinable on the date of issuance and as such in accordance with ASC Topic 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”), the embedded conversion options of the note and warrants on the date of issuance were valued using the binomial lattice options pricing model and recorded as derivative liabilities. The fair value of the conversion option and five-year warrants issued in connection with the note on the date of issuance aggregated $95,497, and were recorded as debt discount. The debt discount was amortized through the term of the note.

iv. In March 2012, the Company commenced an offering of secured promissory notes for an aggregate principal amount of $1,000,000 with three-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,500,000 shares the Company’s common stock (2.5 shares for each $1 of the principal amount of the notes purchased) exercisable at $0.10 per share. The notes bear interest at 18% and have various maturity dates beginning September 2, 2012. At the time of any new debt or equity financing by the Company, the principal and interest then due under the notes may be converted into the number of fully paid and non-assessable debt instruments, shares/or units issued in the financing. Notes in the aggregate principal amount of $850,000 and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,125,000 common shares were sold in the offering. In addition, the investment banker who facilitated the sale of the notes and warrants received a three-year warrant to purchase 212,500 shares of the Company’s common stock (10% of the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants sold in the offering) exercisable at $0.10 per share. The unpaid balance on the notes was $924,837 and $850,000 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The Company is not compliant with the repayment terms of the note.

The conversion price of the note and three-year warrants were not fixed and determinable on the date of issuance and as such in accordance with ASC Topic 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”), the embedded conversion options of the note and warrants on the date of issuance were valued using the binomial lattice options pricing model and recorded as derivative liabilities. The fair value of the conversion option and three-year warrants issued in connection with the note on the date of issuance aggregated $789,073, and was recorded as debt discount. The debt discount was fully amortized through the term of the notes and amounted to $316,958 and $345,418 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2012, respectively.

During October 2012 the Company amended the notes to remove the conversion right and extend the due date to June 30, 2013, and to amend the warrants to remove certain anti-dilution provisions. Holders of an aggregate of $775,000 of principal agreed to such amendments and were granted a warrant to purchase 1,550,000 shares of our common stock equal to two times the principal amount of the note amended, exercisable at $0.50 per share.

The Company evaluated the change in cash flows in connection with the October amendment and determined that there was a greater than 10% change between the present value of the existing debt and the amended debt. As a result, the fair value of the three-year warrants aggregated $140,759 and were recorded as a discount to the modified debt and will be accreted over the remaining term of the modified debt and recognized as interest expense. The accretion of the debt discount on the modified debt amounted to $52,785 and $105,570 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, respectively.

F-14

v. In August 2012, the Company commenced an offering of secured promissory notes for an aggregate principal amount of $3,000,000 with three-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 6,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (two shares for each $1 of the principal amount of the notes purchased) exercisable at $0.50 per share. The notes bear interest at 18% and have various maturity dates beginning March 13, 2013. At the time of any new debt or equity financing by the Company, the principal and interest then due under the notes may be converted into the number of fully paid and non-assessable debt instruments, shares/or units issued in the financing. During year ended December 31, 2012, notes in the aggregate principal amount of $875,000 and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,750,000 shares of the Company’s common stock were sold in the offering. In addition, the investment banker who facilitated the sale of the notes and warrants received a three-year warrant to purchase 175,000 shares of the Company’s common stock (10% of the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants sold in the offering) exercisable at $0.50 per share. The unpaid balance on the notes was $953,103 and $875,000 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The Company is not compliant with the repayment terms of the note.

The conversion price of the note and three-year warrants were not fixed and determinable on the date of issuance and as such in accordance with ASC Topic 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”), the embedded conversion options of the note and warrants on the date of issuance were valued using the binomial lattice options pricing model and recorded as derivative liabilities. The fair value of the conversion option and three-year warrants issued in connection with the note on the date of issuance aggregated $499,186, and were recorded as debt discount. The debt discount was amortized through the term of the notes and amounted to $217,535 for the six months ended June 30, 2013.

vi. During May 2013, the Company issued a $500,000 convertible promissory note with an original issue discount of $50,000. The convertible promissory note is due one year from each advance. After 90 days from each advance, a one-time 12% interest charge shall also be added to note. At any time, the outstanding principle and interest may be converted into fully paid and non-assessable shares of the Company’s common stock. The conversion price shall be 60% of the lowest closing price of the stock for the twenty-five (25) business days preceding the conversion notice. As of September 3, 2013, the Company has been advanced $25,000 on this note. The unpaid balance on the notes was $27,778 at June 30, 2013

The conversion price of the note was not fixed and determinable on the date of issuance and as such in accordance with ASC Topic 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”), the embedded conversion options of the note and warrants on the date of issuance were valued using the binomial lattice options pricing model and recorded as derivative liabilities. The fair value of the conversion option issued in connection with the note on the date of issuance was $28,473, and $25,000 was recorded as a debt discount and the excess balance was booked directly to interest expense. The debt discount was amortized through the term of the notes and amounted to $3,559 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013.

8. FAIR VALUE MEASURES

ASC 820 “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires enhanced disclosures about fair value measurements. As defined in ASC 820, fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The Standard clarifies that the exchange price is the price in an orderly transaction between market participants to sell an asset or transfer a liability at the measurement date, and emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement and not an entity-specific measurement.

ASC 820 establishes the following hierarchy used in fair value measurements and expands the required disclosures of assets and liabilities measured at fair value:

Level 1 – Inputs use quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access.

Level 2 – Inputs use other inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly. These inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets as well as other inputs such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals.

Level 3 – Inputs are unobservable inputs, including inputs that are available in situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the related asset or liability.

F-15

In instances where inputs used to measure fair value fall into different levels in the above fair value hierarchy, fair value measurements in their entirety are categorized based on the lowest level input that is significant to the valuation. The Company’s assessment.

The following table provides the assets and liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively:

	Fair Value Measurements
		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total

Derivative liabilities:
June 30, 2013	$	—	$	—	$	171,822	$	171,822
December 31, 2012	$	—	$	—	$	432,030	$	432,030

The 2013 and 2012 derivative liabilities are measured at fair value using the binomial lattice options pricing model, and are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. The following table sets forth a summary of the changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

		Six Months Ended June 30, 2013			Year Ended December 31, 2012
Fair value, beginning of period	$	432,030		$	155,813
Derivative liabilities recorded during the period		33,186			1,323,548
Reclassification to equity upon conversion of note		—			(1,787,542	)
Reclassification to equity upon amendment of notes and warrants		—			(1,152,144	)
Net unrealized (gain) loss on derivative financial instruments		(293,394	)		1,892,355
Fair value, end of period	$	171,822		$	432,030

9. STOCK OPTIONS AND WARRANTS

Stock Options – Employment Letter Agreement:

On July 3, 2011, in conjunction with Chris White’s employment as the Company’s Vice President of Global Supply Chain, the Company granted Mr. White a seven-year option to purchase 2,950,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.20 per share. The option vested as to 1,180,000 shares on the date of grant, and vests as to 295,000 on each of the first six semi-annual anniversaries of the grant date. The fair value of the option was approximately $317,400. During May 2013, Mr. White resigned from the Company and in accordance with the terms of his non-qualified stock option agreement, all the option shares vest immediately with a revised expiration date of November 17, 2013.

F-16

On January 6, 2012, in conjunction with Mark Zeller’s employment as the Company’s North American Director of Sales, the Company granted Mr. Zeller a five-year option to purchase 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.20 per share. The option vested as to 250,000 on the date of grant, and vests as to 416,667 on each of the first three anniversaries of the grant date. The fair value of the option was approximately $44,000. On May 1, 2012, Mr. Zeller resigned from the Company and the option terminated in accordance with its terms.

On April 24, 2012, in conjunction with Roger Zardo’s employment as the Company’s Director of National Procurement, the Company granted Mr. Zardo a three-year option to purchase 325,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.25 per share. The option vested as to 100,000 on the date of grant, vests as to 75,000 shares on each of the first two anniversaries of the grant date, and vests as to 75,000 shares on November 28, 2014. The fair value of the option was approximately $18,400. During March 2013, Mr. Zardo resigned from the Company and the option terminated in accordance with its terms.

On May 18, 2012, in conjunction with Jack Connelly’s employment as the Company’s Director of National Sales, the Company granted Mr. Connelly a three-year option to purchase 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.25 per share. The option vested as to 100,000 on the date of grant, vests as to 134,000 shares on each of the first two anniversaries of the grant date, and vests as to the final 132,000 shares on November 29, 2014. The fair value of the option was approximately $33,900.

On August 31, 2012, in conjunction with George Borzilleri’s employment as the Company’s Manager, National Retail Sales, the Company granted Mr. Borzilleri a three-year option to purchase 396,427 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.35 per share. The option vested as to 135,714 shares on the date of grant, vests as to 86,904 shares on each of the first two anniversaries of the grant date, and vests as to the final 86,905 shares on March 6, 2015. The fair value of the option was approximately $102,524.

On October 5, 2012, Chris White, the Company’s Vice President of Global Supply was granted a seven year non-qualified stock option to purchase 3,837,719 shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.62 per share. The fair value of the option was $1,221,493. The option vests as follows:

750,000 shares vest immediately.

750,000 shares vest upon receipt of certificates issued by IMO Control (Institute for Marker Ecology) certifying compliance with IMO Controls ‘For Life’ Fair Trade standards for three key Company suppliers.

750,000 shares vest upon the launch by Mr. White of an internal “alpha” demonstration website that contains certain functionality.

198,250 shares vest on each of the next 8 quarter dates starting January 6, 2013 through October 6,^,2014. The final quarterly vesting will be 199,969 shares.

The Company recognized stock based compensation expense associated with stock options included in general and administrative expenses on the condensed consolidated statement of operations of $102,846 and $32,489 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and $298,989 and $62,623 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively for these awards.

F-17

Options Summary:

A summary of option activity during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012 is presented below:

						Weighted
				Weighted		Average
				Average		Remaining
				Exercise		Contractual		Intrinsic
	Shares			Price		Term		Value
Balance at December 31, 2011		2,983,750		$	0.31		4.00	$	—
Granted		6,559,146			0.46		3.55		—
Exercised		—			—		—		—
Forfeited		(1,500,000	)		0.20		—		—
Balance at December 31, 2012		8,042,896			0.45		3.47		88,500
Granted		—			—		—		—
Exercised		—			—		—		—
Forfeited		(325,000	)		0.25		—		—
Balance at June 30, 2013		7,717,896		$	0.46		1.20	$	—

Exercisable at June 30, 2013		7,191,183		$	0.48		1.20	$	—

The Company expects to amortize the remaining stock based compensation expense of approximately $88,000 over the vesting term of the options.

F-18

Common Stock Warrants Summary:

Warrant transactions during the six months ended June 30, 2013 and the year ended December 31, 2012 were as follows:

				Weighted		Average
				Average		Remaining
	Number of			Exercise		Life		Intrinsic
	Warrants			Price		In Years		Value
Balance, December 31, 2011		5,862,140		$	0.12
Granted		10,775,000			0.34
Exercised		(2,039,735	)		0.10
Forfeited		(103,064	)		0.10
Balance, December 31, 2012		14,494,341		$	0.28
Granted		275,000			0.15
Exercised		—			—
Forfeited		—			—
Balance, June 30, 2013		14,769,341		$	0.28		2.30	$	81,508

Exercisable, June 30, 2013		14,769,341		$	0.28		2.30	$	81,508

The intrinsic value is calculated on the difference between the fair market value of the Company’s restricted stock, which was $0.0825 per share as of June 30, 2013, and the exercise price of the warrants.

F-19

The following table presents information related to warrants at June 30, 2013:

Warrants Outstanding				Warrants Exercisable
				Weighted
				Average		Exercisable
Exercise		Number of		Remaining Life		Number of
Price		Warrants		In Years		Warrants

$	0.01		452,354		2.58		452,354
	0.10		692,802		2.63		692,802
	0.25		705,882		2.83		705,882
	0.25		575,000		2.96		575,000
	0.01		452,355		3.00		452,355
	0.25		1,098,220		3.04		1,098,220
	0.001		195,291		1.25		195,291
	0.10		1,000,000		1.38		1,000,000
	0.10		125,000		1.67		125,000
	0.25		300,000		1.67		300,000
	0.10		1,197,437		1.71		1,197,437
	0.50		50,000		2.08		50,000
	0.50		25,000		2.08		25,000
	0.50		50,000		2.17		50,000
	0.50		25,000		2.17		25,000
	0.25		250,000		2.00		250,000
	0.50		1,870,000		2.17		1,870,000
	0.50		55,000		2.25		55,000
	0.50		1,550,000		2.33		1,550,000
	0.50		1,125,000		2.42		1,125,000
	0.50		1,000,000		2.42		1,000,000
	0.25		1,200,000		2.50		1,200,000
	0.50		500,000		2.50		500,000
	0.10		25,000		2.88		25,000
	0.15		250,000		2.92		250,000
			14,769,341		2.30		14,769,341

10. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Consulting Agreement

On July 1, 2008, the Company signed a 16-month consulting agreement with a related party. The consulting services include financial advisory, investment relations and certain administrative and other services for $6,250 monthly fees. At June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company owed $100,000 related to above consulting services, which is included in accrued expenses and other current liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets.

F-20

Employee Warrants

On February 29, 2012, an employee was granted a three year warrant to purchase 300,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for services rendered. The warrant vested upon grant, and was exercisable at $0.25 per share. The Company recorded a charge for $6,149 to stock based compensation for the six months ended June 30, 2012.

11	. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Agreements

During October 2012 we leased approximately 1,641 square feet of office space located at 2030 Addison Street, Berkeley, CA for approximately $4,200 per month under a 29 month agreement with rental payments commencing on January 1, 2013. The rental fee escalated to approximately $4,350 on April 1, 2013 and approximately $4,500 on April 1, 2014.

Future minimum lease payments under all operating leases as of June 30, 2013, are approximately as follows:

Year Ending December 31,	Amount
2013	$ 26,098
2014	53,371
2015	13,441

Total	$ 92,910

Legal matters

In the normal course of business, the Company is, and in the future may be, subject to various disputes, claims, lawsuits, and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business with respect to commercial, product liability, employment, and other matters, which could involve substantial amounts of damages. In the opinion of management, any liability related to any such known proceedings would not have a material adverse effect on the business or financial condition of the Company. Additionally, from time to time, the Company may pursue litigation against third parties to enforce or protect the Company’s rights under the Company’s trademarks, trade secrets and intellectual property rights generally.

During 2010, the Company was served with a lawsuit for the Company’s past due liabilities. The lawsuit was Peri & Sons, plaintiff, vs. Organic Alliance, Inc. and Parker Booth, defendants, for past due produce liabilities. An agreement was reached and the Company has been making payments to the plaintiff. The Company was dismissed from the action and signed a confession of judgment. Over half of the past due amount has been paid with a balance of approximately $21,000 remaining. The Company has accrued for this balance.

On June 20, 2013, the Company was served a lawsuit for a disputed loan issued by the Company. The lawsuit was Austin Noll Jr. plaintiff, vs. Organic Alliance, Inc. and DOES 1 through 50, defendants, for a $50,000 loan issued in July 2009. The case will be reviewed by the Company’s legal counsel. The Company’s position is the loan was repaid by the Company in July 2010.

On July 30 2013, the Company was served with a lawsuit for past due liabilities of the Company. The lawsuit was Tom Ver. LLC d/b/a MexFresh Produce, plaintiff, vs. Organic Alliance, Inc., et al, for past due produce liabilities of $53,863.53. The lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court of the Northern District of California. . The case will be reviewed by the Company’s legal counsel.

On August 1, 2013, the Company received a “Notice of Labor Laws Violation” under California Labor Code 2699, 2699.3 and 2699.5. The notice was file by an employee, Kenneth Horwitz and all current and former employees against Organic Alliance, Inc. Parker Booth, CEO and Barry Brookstein, CFO. The notice alleges various California labor laws violations and seeks wages and penalties from the Company, Mr. Booth and Mr. Brookstein. The notice will be reviewed by the Company’s legal counsel.

F-21

12.	ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following:

			June 30, 2013		December 31, 2012
Due to consultant (Note 10)			$	100,000	$	100,000
Payroll and payroll taxes payable (A)				1,680,534		1,399,049
Other accrued liabilities				71,281		235,814
			$	1,851,815	$	1,734,863
	(A)	As of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, the Company has unpaid payroll taxes including penalties and interest of $309,067 and $286,027, respectively, which have yet to be remitted to the taxing authorities and returns have yet to be filed.

13.	SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

During July 2013, the Company issued a $53,000 convertible promissory note bearing interest at 8% per annum. The convertible promissory note is due on March 10, 2014 and may be converted at any time into fully paid and non-assessable shares of the Company’s common stock. The conversion price shall be 51% of the closing price for the average three lowest trading days during the previous thirty (30) trading days preceding the conversion notice. The conversion price of the note was not fixed and determinable on the date of issuance and as such in accordance with ASC Topic 815 “Derivatives and Hedging” (“ASC 815”), the embedded conversion options of the note on the date of issuance was valued using the binomial lattice options pricing model and recorded as a derivative liability. In addition, the agreement requires the Company reserve 6,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for issuance upon full conversion of the convertible promissory note.

During July 2013, an individual loaned to the Company $10,000. The loan is evidenced by a promissory note payable with interest at 18% and is due on demand.

F-22

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto included elsewhere in this report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that relate to future events or our future financial performance. These statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based largely on our current expectations and are subject to a number of uncertainties and risks including the Risk Factors identified in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012. Actual results could differ materially from these forward-looking statements.

OVERVIEW

History

Our company, a Nevada corporation, was organized in September 2001 under the name NB Design & Licensing, Inc. We were inactive until April 2008, when we completed a reverse merger transaction with Organic Alliance, Inc., a Texas corporation organized in 2008 to sell organically grown fruits and vegetables. In June 2008, we changed our name to Organic Alliance, Inc.

Going Concern

Our Company

We are a global grower and marketer of organic and Fair Trade certified fruits and vegetables in the rapidly growing $29.2 billion U.S. natural, organic and Fair Trade foods marketplace. Through our collaborative relationships with growers and our direct involvement in growing operations, we have built a vertically-integrated supply chain that enables us to support our customers with an increasing variety of certified sustainable products, sensible pricing, and steady supply -- the primary obstacles facing buyers in the fast-growing organic and Fair Trade market segments. Our Organic Alliance branded mangoes, tomatoes, cucumbers, bell peppers and more are already on the shelves of leading national grocery chains including Whole Foods, Heinen’s, Kroger, Safeway, Trader Joes and others. Our Company also sources and distributes some conventional produce (non-organic and Fair Trade) to generate revenues that we believe will help us develop our organic and Fair Trade production.

-3-

Currently, we are focusing our sourcing and development strategy in Mexico, the U.S.’s largest food supplier with sales to the United States growing 25% in 2010 to $6 billion. We intend to continue our development of company-owned or managed organic production in the United States as well as other key Latin American food exporting countries where we currently have strong grower and professional networks, including in Argentina, Chile, Peru, Dominican Republic and Costa Rica.

The primary segments for marketing our products are the mainstream supermarket channel, natural grocery chains, mass merchandisers, food service distributors, fresh produce processors, consumer package goods companies, and overseas markets focusing on grocery chains and their importer partners. Our Company has strong food industry relationships and currently supplies product to many of these market segments.

Our products also address the value proposition sought by many consumers of organic and Fair Trade goods, namely the social responsibility associated with Fair Trade’s contribution to sustainable development and worker prosperity, and environmental responsibility associated with organic farming.

Fair Trade

Fair Trade certification offers producers the ability to trade directly with improved payment terms while paying workers dignified wages and providing a premium for community development. This allows marginalized agricultural communities the opportunity to improve their lives with technical training, better business infrastructure, improved schooling, health care and nutritious food. Fair Trade investment provides a platform from which communities can rise out of poverty, be economically sustainable and take control of their future while providing the market with better, more sustainable products. Fair Trade certified products offer consumers a powerful way to reduce poverty through their everyday shopping.

The key objectives of the Fair Trade standards are to:

·	ensure that producers receive prices that cover their average costs of sustainable production;
·	provide a Fair Trade premium which can be invested in projects that enhance social, economic and environmental development;

·	ensure safe working conditions and dignified wages for agriculture workers;
·	facilitate long-term trading partnerships and enable greater producer control over the trading process; and

·	set clear minimum and progressive criteria to ensure that the conditions of production and trade of all Fair Trade certified products are socially, economically fair and environmentally responsible.

Industry Overview

The organic and Fair Trade marketplace is characterized by strong producer and retailer pricing power as consumer demand continually outstrips supply. As a result, organic and Fair Trade produce prices remain high compared with prices for conventional products. We believe enormous earnings leverage is available to producers and retailers at far higher sales volumes if certified supplies can be increased and prices made more affordable for more consumers.

U.S. organic food sales rose from $6.1 billion in 2000 to $29.2 billion in 2011, a compounded growth rate of over 15 percent. Registering a third straight year of double-digit gains, sales of organic fruits and vegetables rose 11.7 percent in 2011 to $11.8 billion. U.S. Fair Trade sales were $1.5 billion in 2011, growing 20% over 2010 sales and closely following the rise of organic foods into the mainstream¹.

Wall Street clearly favors the organic industry’s strong prospects. Industry leading specialty grocer Whole Foods last month posted second fiscal quarter sales that increased 14 percent to $2.7 billion. “Sales trends remain strong as it appears that the growth of the natural and organic industry has accelerated,” wrote Meredith Adler, an analyst for Barclays Plc. Another market leader, United Natural Foods, Inc. (UNFI), reported sales for the quarter ended April 28 of $1.39 billion, a 15.3 percent increase year over year¹.

Global Fair Trade sales have followed the rise of organic at an 18% annual growth rate, reaching a total of $4.8 billion in 2009. Mainstream retailers such as Wal-Mart and Whole Foods have demonstrated strong interest in the segment, with each offering a growing number of Fair Trade products including retail-brand private label options. In 2007, Whole Foods launched its “Whole Trade” initiative, requiring 50% of its imported food to be certified as Fair Trade within 10 years. Fair Trade sales in U.S. mainstream grocery outlets grew 24% in 2010. Like organic, the principal barrier to growth is lack of supply and inconsistent quality and/or pricing, which we believe our Company directly addresses².

¹- Source: http://www.helpguide.org/life/organic_foods_pesticides_gmo.htm.

²- Source: http://www.fairtrade.net/what_is_fairtrade.html.

-4-

Growth Strategy

Due to the continued increase in demand for certified organic and Fair Trade products, our customers’ procurement departments are actively seeking additional sources for such products. Their challenge is to attain a reliable, year round supply at sensible pricing, in part due to short supply and the fractionalized nature of the organic and Fair Trade farm bases. Our strategy to address this challenge includes:

Rapidly Increase Organic and Fair Trade Produce Supply. We intend to utilize our industry leading expertise in rapidly developing Fair Trade certified and organic production to increase our ability to supply the marketplace. We believe our Fair Trade tomatoes sold through Whole Foods in 2012 were the first of their kind to be introduced to the market, and we intend to develop a number of other Fair Trade certified products that also will be the first of their kind to market. In doing so, we believe this will give us preferred access to high-value markets.

Control & Integrate Supply Chains. We expect to build company controlled production capacity in the United States, Mexico and other countries, adding to our existing short-term leased Mexican mango orchards and greenhouses established in early 2013. By continuing to build company-owned production capacity, we believe we attract buyer favor by creating supply and price conditions that more closely resemble the conventional food alternative.

Build Market Share. We intend to leverage our increasing portfolio of Fair Trade and organic certified products, along with our price-competitiveness and ability to customize client programs through vertical integration, to further expand our penetration into the North American and European food retail markets.

Build Brand Value. Through partnerships with retailers and scanable QR technology, our “Make Life Sweet^TM”campaign allows us to tell the inspiring stories and impact of our products to consumers at the point-of-purchase. We intend to build the Organic Alliance brand with the intrinsic value our products carry: “Food that is good for the planet, good for farmers and good for you.”

Diversify into Growing Market Segments. We intend to continue using our operational infrastructure to sell a small core list of conventional produce to generate resources for the execution of large-scale development in the organic and Fair Trade agriculture sectors. Specifically, we expect to develop capacity to process our fruit and vegetable production into organic and Fair Trade certified value-added foods such as dried, juices and frozen, a new and rapidly growing sector in the organic foods market with healthy margins and long-term growth potential.

-5-

Critical Accounting Estimates and Policies

Principles of Consolidation - The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Organic Alliance, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Organic Texas, Inc. All significant inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts - An allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable is recorded based on a combination of aging analysis, past practices and any specific troubled accounts. Our Company’s produce is sold to our Company’s customers for cash or on credit terms which are established in accordance with local and industry practices and typically require payment within 10 to 30 days of delivery. Accounts are written off when uncollectibility is confirmed. Subsequent recoveries, if any, are credited to the allowance account. The allowance for doubtful accounts amounted to $5,000 at June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

In addition, our Company also factors our receivables with full recourse and, as a result, accounts for the factoring akin to a secured borrowing, maintaining the gross receivable asset and due to factor liability on our books and records. In connection with the factoring of our receivables, our Company estimates an allowance for factoring fees associated with the collections. These fees range from 3% to 5% depending on the actual timing of the collection. The actual recognition and amount of such fees may differ from the estimates depending upon the timing of collections.

Inventory - Inventory is stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market, and includes principally produce our Company purchases from growers and packaging materials. Our Company held $75,228 and $139,888 of inventory as of June 30, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments - The carrying amounts of financial instruments, including cash, receivables, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximated fair value as of the balance sheet date presented, because of the relatively short maturity dates on these instruments. The carrying amounts of the notes payable issued approximate fair value as of the balance sheet date presented, because interest rates and other terms on these instruments approximate terms currently available on similar instruments.

Derivative Financial Instruments - Our Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market or foreign currency risks. Our Company evaluates all of our financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported in the statements of operations. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is evaluated at the end of each reporting period. Derivative liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

Revenue Recognition - Revenue is recorded when (1) the customer accepts delivery of the product and title has been transferred and our Company has no significant obligations remaining to be performed; (2) a final understanding as to specific nature and terms of the agreed upon transaction has occurred; (3) price is fixed and (4) collection is reasonably assured. Sales are presented net of discounts and allowances.

Share Based Compensation - Our Company accounts for share-based compensation in accordance with the fair value recognition provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) No. 718. Share-based compensation expense for all share-based payment awards is based on the estimated grant-date fair value. Our Company recognizes these compensation costs over the requisite service period of the award, which is generally the option vesting term. Option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected life of the option, and such assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate. The fair value of share-based payment awards was estimated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Our Company accounts for the expected life of options in accordance with the “simplified” method provisions of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (“SAB”) No. 110, which enables the use of the simplified method for “plain vanilla” share options as defined in SAB No. 107.

-6-

Results of Operations

Results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the three months ended June 30, 2012

For the three months ended June 30, 2013, we had net sales of $290,403 compared to $630,294 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The $339,891 or 54% decrease was attributable to suspending selling activities during early May 2013 due to a cash flow crisis. The Company plans to restart selling activities upon obtaining suitable financing.

For the three months ended June 30, 2013, our cost of goods sold was $247,285 compared to $570,557 for the three months ended June 30, 2012, the $323,272 or 57% decrease was primarily attributable to the lower sales volume.

For the three months ended June 30, 2013, our gross margin was $43,118 or 14.8% of sales compared to a gross margin of $59,737 or 9.5% of sales for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The increase in the gross margin as a percentage of sales was attributable to a positive impact from the Company’s change towards securing long-term supply contracts with our growing partners that resulted in lower costs.

For the three months ended June 30, 2013, we had general and administrative (G&A) expenses of $621,741 compared to $1,097,172 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease in G&A expenses of $475,431, or 43%, is primarily attributable to decreased payroll expenses of approximately $30,000 as most employees were furloughed or resigned by May 31, 2013 due to a cash flow crisis, decreased stock based compensation of approximately $430,000 for key employee compensation, financing compensation and investor relations compensation, and general decrease of other operating costs of approximately $15,000.

For the three months ended June 30, 2013, our operating loss was $578,623 compared to $1,037,435 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The $458,812, or 44%, decrease in net operating loss was primarily attributable to the lower G&A expenses described above.

For the three months ended June 30, 2013, other expense was $209,196 compared to $2,296,630 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. Included in other expense were the following items:

interest expense of $179,215 and $83,579 on notes and loans payable for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase is due to increased loan amounts;

amortization of discount on notes payable of $95,157 and $404,240 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decrease is due to overall decrease in notes issued during the period with equity instruments fair valued and recorded as debt discounts;

factor advance fees of $15,518 and $27,382 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decrease is due to suspending selling activities;

a $80,694 gain on change in fair value of derivative liability for the three months ended June 30, 2013 compared to a loss on change in fair value of derivative liability of 1,719,679 for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The change is due to a decrease in the market price of our common stock; and

finance fees of $61,750 for the three months ended June 30, 2012 relating to our offering of $475,000 of secured promissory notes that began funding during March 2012.

For the three months ended June 30, 2013, the net loss was $787,819, or $0.04, basic and diluted loss per share compared to $3,334,065, or $0.19, basic and diluted loss per share for the three months ended June 30, 2012. The $2,546,246 or 76% decrease in net loss was primarily attributable to factors described above.

-7-

Results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to the six months ended June 30, 2012

For the six months ended June 30, 2013, we had net sales of $981,205 compared to $966,301, for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The $14,904 or 2% increase was attributable to growth in the retail segment. However, the Company suspended selling activities during early May 2013 due to a cash flow crisis. The Company plans to restart selling activities upon obtaining suitable financing.

For the six months ended June 30, 2013, our cost of goods sold was $861,180 compared to $873,420 for the six months ended June 30, 2012, the $12,240 or 1% decrease was primarily attributable to efficient purchasing practices.

For the six months ended June 30, 2013, our gross margin was $120,025 or 12.2% of sales compared to a gross margin of $92,881 or 9.6% of sales for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The increase in the gross margin as a percentage of sales was attributable to a positive impact from the Company’s change towards securing long-term supply contracts with our growing partners that resulted in lower costs.

For the six months ended June 30, 2013, we had general and administrative (G&A) expenses of $1,511,852 compared to $1,554,014 for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease in G&A expenses of $42,162, or 3%, is primarily attributable to decreased stock based compensation of approximately $273,000 for key employee compensation, financing compensation and investor relations compensation, offset by increased payroll expenses of approximately $74,000 for the hiring of key management positions and staff to support company growth, however, most employees were furloughed or resigned by May 31, 2013 due to a cash flow crisis. In addition, the Company wrote-off approximated $95,000 of grower advances and deposits that were deemed worthless and a general increase of other operating costs of approximately $62,000.

For the six months ended June 30, 2013, our operating loss was $1,391,827 compared to $1,461,133 for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The $69,306, or 5%, decrease in net operating loss was primarily attributable to the lower G&A expenses described above.

For the six months ended June 30, 2013, other expense was $509,673 compared to $2,803,765 for the six months ended June 30, 2012. Included in other expense were the following items:

interest expense of $358,548 and $136,427 on notes and loans payable for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase is due to increased loan amounts;

amortization of discount on notes payable of $403,443 and $514,252 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decrease is due to overall decrease in notes issued during the period with equity instruments fair valued and recorded as debt discounts;

factor advance fees of $41,076 and $40,892 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The increase is due to higher sales activities;

a $293,394 gain on change in fair value of derivative liability for the six months ended June 30, 2013 compared to a loss on change in fair value of derivative liability of 1,997,944 for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The change is due to a decrease in the market price of our common stock; and

finance fees of $114,250 for the six months ended June 30, 2012 relating to our offering of $850,000 of secured promissory notes that began funding during March 2012.

For the six months ended June 30, 2013, the net loss was $1,901,500, or $0.10, basic and diluted loss per share compared to $4,264,898, or $0.25, basic and diluted loss per share for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The $2,363,398 or 55% decrease in net loss was primarily attributable to factors described above.

-8-

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our operations to date have generated substantial losses that have been funded through our sale of common stock to, and loans from, related parties and others. We will require additional sources of outside capital to continue our operations. We expect that our primary sources of cash in the future will be from the issuance of common stock, loans, accounts receivable factoring and a line of credit. On November 1, 2010, we signed a one year agreement with a financial services company for the purchase and sale of accounts receivables which expired on October 31, 2011. The agreement is continuing on a month to month basis. The financial services company commenced funding during February 2011. Under the agreement, the financial services company advances up to 80% of qualified customer invoices less an applicable discount fee, and holds the remaining 20% as a reserve until the customer pays the financial services company. The released reserves are used to fund other vendor purchases or returned to our company. We are charged 3% for the first 30 days outstanding plus 1/10 of 1% daily for funds outstanding over 30 days. Uncollectable customer invoices are charged back to our Company.

As of June 30, 2013, we have $309,067 of payroll tax liabilities inclusive of penalties and interest, from wages paid which have yet to be remitted to the taxing authorities.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the ability of our Company to obtain the necessary financing to meet our obligations and pay our liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due, and increasing our revenues in order to achieve profitable operations. The outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with any certainty at this time and raise substantial doubt that our Company will be able to continue as a going concern. Our condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to the amounts and classification of assets and liabilities that may be necessary should our Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

At June 30, 2013, we are not compliant with the repayments terms of various notes payable for an aggregate of approximately $4,652,000 including accrued interest.

We have limited funding available for marketing and will rely solely on the Company’s ability to raise debt or equity funds in the immediate future.

Our contractual obligations consist of notes and loans payable in the amount of $4,748,453 including accrued interest of $567,284, at June 30, 2013.

On February 28, 2012, we issued a $50,000 promissory note to a related party. The loan bears interest at 21% and had a maturity date of the earlier of an event of default or August 28, 2012. During December 2012, we amended the note to extend the due date to June 30, 2013. For consideration, the holder was granted a warrant to purchase 125,000 shares of our common stock equal to two and a half times the principal amount of the note amended, exercisable at $0.20 per share. The Company is not compliant with of the repayment terms of the note.

In March 2012, we commenced an offering of secured promissory notes for an aggregate principal amount of $1,000,000 with three-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,500,000 shares our common stock (2.5 shares for each $1 of the principal amount of the notes purchased) exercisable at $0.10 per share. The notes bear interest at 18% and have various maturity dates beginning September 2, 2012. At the time of any new debt or equity financing by our Company, the principal and interest then due under the notes may be converted into the number of fully paid and non-assessable debt instruments, shares/or units issued in the financing. The full amount of the offering was not reached and notes in the aggregate principal amount of $850,000 and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,125,000 common shares were sold in the offering. In addition, the investment banker who facilitated the sale of the notes and warrants received a three-year warrant to purchase 212,500 shares of our common stock (10% of the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants sold in the offering) exercisable at $0.10 per share. During October 2012 we amended the notes to remove the conversion right and extend the due date to June 30, 2013, and to amend the warrants to remove certain anti-dilution provisions. Holders of an aggregate of $775,000 in principal agreed to such amendments were granted a warrant to purchase 1,550,000 shares of our common stock equal to two times the principal amount of the note amended, exercisable at $0.50 per share. The Company is not compliant with of the repayment terms of the note.

-9-

In August 2012, we commenced an offering of secured promissory notes for an aggregate principal amount of $3,000,000 with three-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 6,000,000 shares our common stock (two shares for each $1 of the principal amount of the notes purchased) exercisable at $0.50 per share. The notes bear interest at 18% and have a various maturity dates beginning March 13, 2013. At the time of any new debt or equity financing by our Company, the principal and interest then due under the notes may be converted into the number of fully paid and non-assessable debt instruments, shares/or units issued in the financing. The full amount of the offering was not reached and notes in the aggregate principal amount of $875,000 and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,750,000 common shares were sold in the offering. In addition, the investment banker who facilitated the sale of the notes and warrants received a three-year warrant to purchase 175,000 shares of our common stock (10% of the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants sold in the offering) exercisable at $0.50 per share. The Company is not compliant with the repayment terms of the note.

On August 1, 2012, we issued a $60,000 promissory note with an original issue discount of 20%. The promissory note had a maturity date of October 29, 2012. As a financing incentive, the lender received three-year warrants to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share. The Company is not compliant with the repayment terms of the note.

On August 7, 2012, we issued a $30,000 promissory note with an original issue discount of 20%. The promissory note had a maturity date of November 5, 2012. As a financing incentive, the lender received three-year warrants to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share. The Company is not compliant with the repayment terms of the note.

On August 22, 2012, we issued a $60,000 promissory note with an original issue discount of 20%. The promissory note had a maturity date of November 20, 2012. As a financing incentive, the lender received three-year warrants vesting to purchase 50,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share. The Company is not compliant with the repayment terms of the note.

On August 23, 2012, we issued a $30,000 promissory note with an original issue discount of 20%. The promissory note had a maturity date of November 21, 2012. As a financing incentive, the lender received three-year warrants to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share. In December 2012, the Company re-paid the note.

In December 2012, we commenced an offering of secured promissory notes for an aggregate principal amount of $2,500,000 with three-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 5,000,000 shares our common stock (two shares for each $1 of the principal amount of the notes purchased) exercisable at $0.50 per share. The notes bear interest at 18% and have a maturity date of June 30, 2013. The full amount of the offering was not reached and notes in the aggregate principal amount of $1,000,000 and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,000,000 common shares were sold in the offering. In addition, the investment banker who facilitated the sale of the notes and warrants received a three-year warrant to purchase 200,000 shares of our common stock (10% of the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants sold in the offering) exercisable at $0.50 per share. The Company is not compliant with the repayment terms of the note.

On May 8, 2013, the Company issued a $30,000 promissory note with an original issue discount of 20%. The promissory note is due on the earlier of (i) the closing by the Company of a financing or series of financings for aggregate cash proceeds of at least $1,850,000, or, (ii) July 5, 2013. As a financing incentive, the lender received a three-year warrant, vesting immediately, to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.10 per share. The Company is not compliant with the repayment terms of the note.

On May 15, 2013, the Company issued a $500,000 convertible promissory note with an original issue discount of $50,000. The convertible promissory note is due one year from each advance. After 90 days from each advance, a one-time 12% interest charge shall also be added to note. At any time, the outstanding principle and interest may be converted into fully paid and non-assessable shares of the Company’s common stock. The conversion price shall be 60% of the average closing price of the stock for the twenty-five (25) business days preceding the conversion notice. As of September 3, 2013, the Company has been advanced $25,000 on this note.

During April 2013 and June 2013, Barry Brookstein, CFO, loaned to the Company $37,050. The loan is evidenced by a promissory note payable with interest at 18% and is due on demand.

During June 2013, the Company issued a $53,000 convertible promissory note bearing interest at 8% per annum. The note funded on July 2, 2013. The convertible promissory note is due on March 10, 2014 and may be converted at any time into fully paid and non-assessable shares of the Company’s common stock. The conversion price shall be 51% of the closing price for the average three lowest trading days during the previous thirty (30) trading days preceding the conversion notice. In addition, the agreement requires the Company reserve 6,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for issuance upon full conversion of the of the convertible promissory note.

One July 9, 2013, an individual loaned to the Company $10,000. The loan is evidenced by a promissory note payable with interest at 18% and is due on demand.

-10-

Net Cash Flows

For the six months ended June 30, 2013, net cash used in operating activities was $210,912 compared to $1,103,497 net cash used in operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease of $892,585 or 81% primarily was attributable to increased accounts payable and decreased accounts receivables and inventory as the Company suspending selling activities during the six months ended June 30, 2013.

For the six months ended June 30, 2013, net cash provided by financing activities was $51,566 compared to $1,102,090 for six months ended June 30, 2012. The decrease of $1,056,524, or 95%, was related to proceeds from the sales of secured promissory notes in the six months ended June 30, 2012.

At June 30, 2013 and 2012, respectively, we had outstanding options to purchase 7,717,896 and 4,058,750 shares of our common stock, and warrants to purchase 14,769,341 and 8,937,140 shares of our common stock. The outstanding stock options have a weighted average exercise price of $0.46 per share. The outstanding warrants have an exercise price from $0.001 to $0.50 per share. Accordingly, at June 30, 2013, the outstanding options and warrants represented a total of 22,487,237 shares issuable for a maximum of $7,695,795 if all of the options and warrants were exercised. The exercise of these options and warrants is at the discretion of the holder. There is no assurance that any of these options or any additional warrants will be exercised.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

Our Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management team, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Exchange Act), as of the last day of the fiscal period covered by this report, June 30, 2013. The term disclosure controls and procedures means the Company’s controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that the Company filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that the Company filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f). Management is required to base its assessment of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting on a suitable, recognized control framework, such as the framework developed by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO). The COSO framework, published in Internal Control-Integrated Framework, is known as the COSO Report. The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has chosen the COSO framework on which to base its assessment and conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation our disclosure controls and procedures as such term is defined under Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2013.

-11-

The controls designed were adequate for financial disclosures required for the preparation of the 10-Q filing; however due to lack of resources in the Company’s accounting department the controls were not operating effectively. The remediation plan for improving the effectiveness over financial disclosure controls, include the creation of a financial disclosures roll-forward model in accordance with the disclosures contained in the 10-Q report. This model will be maintained and updated by Company staff and management as new business transactions require additional financial disclosures. As the Company obtains additional resources these financial disclosures will be reviewed by an outside financial disclosure expert for completeness and accuracy earlier in the financial statement closing process cycle in order to help ensure completeness and accuracy for reporting financial disclosures.

It should be noted that any system of controls, however well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance that the objectives of the system are met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of certain events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.

Changes in internal control over financial reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II-OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the normal course of business, we are, and in the future may be, subject to various disputes, claims, lawsuits, and administrative proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business with respect to commercial, product liability, employment, and other matters, which could involve substantial amounts of damages. In the opinion of management, any liability related to any such known proceeding would not have a material adverse effect on our business or financial condition. Additionally, from time to time, we may pursue litigation against third parties to enforce or protect our rights under our trademarks, trade secrets and our intellectual property rights generally.

During 2010, we were served with a lawsuit for our past due liabilities. The lawsuit was Peri & Sons, plaintiff, vs. Organic Alliance, Inc. and Parker Booth, defendants, for past due produce liabilities. An agreement was reached and OAI has been making payments to the plaintiff. OAI was dismissed from the action and signed a confession of judgment. Over half of the past due amount has been paid with a balance of approximately $21,000 remaining. The Company has accrued for this balance.

-12-

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALE OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

During March 2013, the Company issued 500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to a consultant for investor and public relations services. The shares were valued at $0.11 per share or $55,000. The shares were issued pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act.

During May 2013, the Company issued a $30,000 promissory note with an original issue discount of 20%. The promissory note is due on the earlier of (i) the closing by the Company of a financing or series of financings for aggregate cash proceeds of at least $1,850,000, or, (ii) July 5, 2013. As a financing incentive, the lender received a three-year warrant, vesting immediately, to purchase 25,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $0.10 per share.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

In March 2012, we commenced an offering of secured promissory notes for an aggregate principal amount of $1,000,000 with three-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,500,000 shares our common stock (2.5 shares for each $1 of the principal amount of the notes purchased) exercisable at $0.10 per share. The notes bear interest at 18% and have various maturity dates beginning September 2, 2012. At the time of any new debt or equity financing by our Company, the principal and interest then due under the notes may be converted into the number of fully paid and non-assessable debt instruments, shares/or units issued in the financing. The full amount of the offering was not reached and notes in the aggregate principal amount of $850,000 and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,125,000 common shares were sold in the offering. In addition, the investment banker who facilitated the sale of the notes and warrants received a three-year warrant to purchase 212,500 shares of our common stock (10% of the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants sold in the offering) exercisable at $0.10 per share. During October 2012 we amended the notes to remove the conversion right and extend the due date to June 30, 2013, and to amend the warrants to remove certain anti-dilution provisions. Holders of an aggregate of $775,000 agreed to such amendments were granted a warrant to purchase 1,550,000 shares of our common stock equal to two times the principal amount of the note amended, exercisable at $0.50 per share. We defaulted on the notes, and the unpaid balance, including accrued interest, was $924,837 at June 30, 2013. We currently are seeking to amend the notes.

In August 2012, we commenced an offering of secured promissory notes for an aggregate principal amount of $3,000,000 with three-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 6,000,000 shares our common stock (two shares for each $1 of the principal amount of the notes purchased) exercisable at $0.50 per share. The notes bear interest at 18% and have a various maturity dates beginning March 13, 2013. At the time of any new debt or equity financing by our Company, the principal and interest then due under the notes may be converted into the number of fully paid and non-assessable debt instruments, shares/or units issued in the financing. The full amount of the offering was not reached and notes in the aggregate principal amount of $875,000 and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 1,750,000 common shares were sold in the offering. In addition, the investment banker who facilitated the sale of the notes and warrants received a three-year warrant to purchase 175,000 shares of our common stock (10% of the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants sold in the offering) exercisable at $0.50 per share. We defaulted on the notes, and the unpaid balance, including accrued interest, was $953,103 at June 30, 2013. We currently are seeking to amend the notes.

In December 2012, we commenced an offering of secured promissory notes for an aggregate principal amount of $2,500,000 with three-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 5,000,000 shares our common stock (two shares for each $1 of the principal amount of the notes purchased) exercisable at $0.50 per share. The notes bear interest at 18% and have a maturity date of June 30, 2013. The full amount of the offering was not reached and notes in the aggregate principal amount of $1,000,000 and warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,000,000 common shares were sold in the offering. In addition, the investment banker who facilitated the sale of the notes and warrants received a three-year warrant to purchase 200,000 shares of our common stock (10% of the number of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of the warrants sold in the offering) exercisable at $0.50 per share. We defaulted on the notes, and the unpaid balance, including accrued interest, was $1,089,260 at June 30, 2013. We currently are seeking to amend the notes.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

	31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
	31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
	32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
	32.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

-13-

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

ORGANIC ALLIANCE, INC.

Date: September 3, 2013	Organic Alliance, Inc.
	By: /s/ Parker Booth
	Parker Booth Chief Executive Officer and Director

Date: September 3, 2013	Organic Alliance, Inc.
	By: /s/ Barry Brookstein
	Barry Brookstein Chief Financial Officer

-14-

INDEX TO EXHIBIT

Exhibit No. Description

31.1

31.2

32.1

32.2

Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act

Organic Alliance, Inc. 10-Q