UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X]	Quarterly report pursuant Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
	For the quarterly period ended February 28, 2015.
	For the quarterly period ended May 31, 2015.
[ ]	Transition report pursuant Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
	For the transition period from ___________ to __________.

000-50738

(Commission file number)

[amcor10q_053115002.gif]

AMERICAN CORDILLERA MINING CORPORATION

(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)


Nevada	91-1959986
(State or other jurisdiction	(IRS Employer
of incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)

1314 S. Grand Blvd, Ste. 2-250, Spokane, WA 99202

(Address of principal executive offices)

(509) 744-8590

(Registrant’s telephone number)

______________________________________

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive DataFile required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filer [ ]	Accelerated filer [ ]
Non-accelerated filer [ ]	Smaller reporting company [X]
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [ ] No [X]

As of ~~May~~July 420, 2015, there were 89,882,679 shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION		3
Item 1.	Financial Statements	3
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	33
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	38
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	38
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION		4039
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	4039
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	4039
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	4039
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	4039
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosure [Not Applicable]	4039
Item 5.	Other Information	4039
Item 6.	Exhibits	4039
SIGNATURES		4140

- 2 -

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AMERICAN CORDILLERA MINING CORPORATION

~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015 AND 2014

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Consolidated Balance Sheets at February 28, 2015 (Unaudited) and November 30, 2014	4
Consolidated Balance Sheets at May 31, 2015 (Unaudited) and November 30, 2014	4
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three Months Ended February 28, 2015 and 2014 (Unaudited)	5
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Three and Six Months Ended May 31, 2015 and 2014 (Unaudited)	5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Three Months Ended February 28, 2015 and 2014 (Unaudited)	6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended May 31, 2015 and 2014 (Unaudited)	6
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	7

- 3 -

American Cordillera Mining Corporation
AMERICAN CORDILLERA MINING CORPORATION
Consolidated Balance Sheets
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
					February 28, 2015		November 30, 2014
				May 31, 2015		November 30, 2014
					(Unaudited)
ASSETS				(Unaudited)
ASSETS
	CURRENT ASSETS
	CURRENT ASSETS
		Cash		$ -		$ 85
		Cash			$	12	$	85
		Prepaid expenses		1,800		2,700
		Marketable securities		32,120		3635,~~014~~054		~~35,054~~
		Prepaid expense				2,700		2,700
			Total Current Assets	32,920		37,839
			Total current assets			38,726		37,839
	Mineral rights			21,000		33,500
	Mineral rights
	TOTAL ASSETS			$ 54,920		$ 71,339
		Mineral rights				382,064		382,064
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
		Accumulated impairment				(348,564)		(348,564)
	CURRENT LIABILITIES
			Mineral rights, net			33,500		33,500
		Accounts payable		$ 60,537		$ 72,854
	Total assets				$	72,226	$	71,339
		Convertible notes payable - related party		28,000		28,000
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
		Convertible notes payable		-		-
	CURRENT LIABILITIES
		Notes payable - related party		34,000		46,800
		Accounts payable			$	70,104	$	72,854
		Notes payable		-		-
		Accrued interest - related parties				5,795		4,737
		Accrued Expenses		5,864		4,737
		Convertible notes payable - related parties				28,000		28,000
			Total Current Liabilities	128,41		152,391
		Notes payable - related parties				51,800		46,800
	LONG TERM LIABILITIES			-		-
			Total current liabilities			155,699		152,391
	TOTAL LIABILITIES			128,401		152,391
			Total liabilities			155,699		152,391
	COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES			-		-
	COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
	STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
	STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
		Preferred stock, 10,000,000 shares authorized, $0.001 par value; no shares issued and outstanding		-		-
		Preferred stock par value $0.001: 10,000,000 shares authorized;
		Common stock, 200,000,000 shares authorized, $0.001 par value; 89,882,679 and 89,882,679 shares issued and outstanding, respectively		89,883		89,883
			none issued or outstanding			-		-
		Additional paid-in capital		495,359		495,359
		Common stock par value $0.001: 200,000,000 shares authorized;
		Deficit accumulated during the exploration stage		(640,843)		(651,348)
			89,882,679 shares issued and outstanding			89,883		89,883
		Accumulated other compressive income (loss)
		Additional paid-in capital				495,359		495,359
			Foreign currency translation gain (loss)	(8,878)		(4,946)
		Accumulated deficit				(654,729)		(651,348)
			Change in unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities	(9,002)		(10,000)
		Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
			Total Stockholders' Equity	(73,481)		(81,052)
			Unrealized gain (loss) on marketable securities			(5,000)		(10,000)
	TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY			$ 54,920		$ 71,339
			Foreign currency translation gain (loss)			(8,986)		(4,946)
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
			Total Stockholders' Deficit			(83,473)		(81,052)
	Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit				$	72,226	$	71,339
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

- 4 -

American Cordillera Mining Corporation
AMERICAN CORDILLERA MINING CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
				For the Three Months			For the Three Months
(Unaudited)
				Ended			Ended
			For the Three Months Ended			For the Six Months Ended
				February 28, 2015			February 28, 2015
			May 31, 2015		May 31, 2014	May 31, 2015		May 31, 2014
				(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Revenue earned during the exploration state
Revenue
	Revenue from the sale of metal bearing concentrate		$ -		$ -	$ -		$ -
	Sales			$	-		$	-
	Royalty revenue		50,000		40,000	50,000		40,000
	Royalty revenue				-			-
		Revenue earned during the exploration stage	62,500		40,000	50,000		40,000
		Total revenue			-			-
	Cost of Revenue
~~Cost of revenue~~		Cost of revenue	4,639		7,320	4,170		7,522
	Cost of exploration				71			202
		Royalty expense	-		-	-		-
		Total cost of revenue			71			202
						4,170		7,522
Gross margin					(71)			(202)
Gross Margin			45,361		32,680	45,290		32,478
Operating expenses
Operating Expenses
	Professional fees				1,275			1,197
	General and administrative		717		4,677	1,694		4,894
	General and administrative expenses				977			216
	Professional fees		29,909		27,678	31,184		28,875
		Total operating expenses			2,252			1,413
		Total Operating Expenses	30,646		32,356	32,878		33,769
Loss from operations					(2,323)			(1,615)
Income (loss) from operations			14,735		324	12,412		(1,291)
Other (income) expenses
	Interest expense - related party				1,058			881
	Interest expense		-		-	-		-
		Other (income) expenses, net			1,058			881
	Interest expense - related party		849		777	1,907		1,658
Loss before income tax provision					(3,381)			(2,496)
		Other (income) expenses, net	849		777	1,907		1,658
Income tax provision					-			-
Income (loss) before income tax provision			13,886		(453)	10,505		(2,949)
Net loss					(3,381)			(2,496)
Income tax provision			-		-	-		-
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Net income (loss)			13,886		(453)	10,505		$ (2,949)
	Change in unrealized gain (loss) of marketable securities				5,000			40,000
Other comprehensive income (loss)
	Foreign currency translation gain (loss)		(16)		(41,~~040)~~997	(4,056)		(42,~~977~~980)
Comprehensive income (loss)				$	(2,421)		$	32,527
	Unrealized gain (loss) from marketable securities		(3,878)		(51,500)	1,122		(11,500)
Net loss per common share
Comprehensive income (loss)			$ 9,992		$ (49,956)	$ 7,571		$ (17,429)
	- Basic and diluted			$	(0.00)		$	(0.00)
	Earnings per share
Weighted average common shares issued and outstanding
		Basic and diluted	$ 0.00		$ (0.00)	$ 0.00		$ (0.00)
	- Basic and diluted				89,882,679			89,882,679
	Weighted average common shares outstanding
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
		Basic and diluted	89,882,679		89,882,679	89,882,679		89,882,679
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

- 5 -

American Cordillera Mining Corporation
AMERICAN CORDILLERA MINING CORPORATION
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
					For the Three Months		For the Three Months
(Unaudited)
					Ended		Ended
			For the Six Months Ended
					February 28, 2015		February 28, 2014
			May 31, 2015	May 31, 2014
					(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
	Net loss		$ 10,505	$ (2,948)
	Net loss				$	(3,381)	$	(2,496)
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operations:
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
		Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses	1,127	1,659
	Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
		Increase (decrease) in accounts payable	(12,317)	(23,122)
		Prepaid expenses				-		(5,000)
		Increase (decrease) in prepaid expenses	900	(5,000)
		Accounts payable				(2,750)		(26,252)
Net cash used by operating activities			215	(29,411)
		Accrued expenses				1,058		881
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
		Net cash used in operating activities				(5,073)		(32,867)
	Cash acquired from business acquisition		-	-
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
	Purchase of mineral rights		-	-
	Return of investment in mineral rights		12,500	20,000		-		~~20,000~~
		Net cash provided by investing activities				-		20,000
Net cash used by investing activities			12,500	20,000
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
	Proceeds from convertible notes payable		-	-		-		~~15,500~~
	Repayments of convertible notes payable - related party					-		(23,000)
	Repayments of convertible notes payable		-	-
	Proceeds from notes payable					-		2,800
	Proceeds from convertible notes payable - related party		-	-
	Proceeds from notes payable - related party					5,000		17,500
	Proceeds from notes payable		-	300
		Net cash provided by financing activities				5,000		12,800
	Repayments of notes payable		-	-
NET CHANGE IN CASH						(73)		(67)
	Proceeds from notes payable - related party		11,000	20,000
CASH, BEGINNING OF REPORTING PERIOD						85		138
	Repayments of notes payable - related party		(23,800)	(7,500)
CASH, END OF REPORTING PERIOD					$	12	$	71
	Proceeds from sale of common stock		-	-
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES:
Net cash provided by financing activities			(12,800)	12,800
	Interest paid				$	-	$	-
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH			(85)	3,389
	Income tax paid				$	-	$	-
CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD			85	138
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITES
CASH, END OF PERIOD			$ -	$ 3,527
	Securities received as a return of investment in mineral rights				$	-	$	50,000
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW DISCLOSURES:
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.
	Interest paid		$ -	$ -
	Income taxes paid		$ -	$ -
NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITES
	Securities received as a return of investment in mineral rights		$ -	$ 60,000
	Common shares issued for acquisition of mineral rights		$ -	$ -
	Common shares issued for conversion of accrued interest		$ -	$ -
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

- 6 -

American Cordillera Mining Corporation

May 31, 2015 and 2014

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

February 28, 2015 and 2014

(Unaudited)

Note 1 - Organization and Operations

GCJ, Inc. (formerly Chad Guidry, Inc.)

GCJ, Inc. ("GCJ") (formerly Chad Guidry, Inc.) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on March 30, 2004 as a blank check company. GCJ, Inc. was inactive prior to merging with and into APD Antiquities, Inc.

American Cordillera Mining Corporation (formally APD Antiquities, Inc.) and Plan of Merger

APD Antiquities, Inc. (“APD”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on July 23, 1996. On December 27, 2004, APD and GCJ, Inc. entered into to an Acquisition Agreement and Plan of Merger, whereby APD acquired all of the outstanding shares of common stock of GCJ from its sole stockholder in exchange for $3,600 and GCJ was merged with and into APD with APD as the surviving company. Pursuant to Rule 12g-3(g) of the General Rules and Regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, APD is the successor issuer to GCJ for reporting purposes under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"). The purpose of this transaction was for APD to succeed the registration status of GCJ under the Exchange Act pursuant to Rule 12g-3.

APD Antiquities, Inc. was engaged in acquiring, importing, marketing, and selling valuable antiquity and art items of Asian origin.

Effective on October 17, 2011, upon written consent of the majority of the Company’s Board of Directors, dated October 14, 2011, the majority shareholders of the Company, adopted and implemented a name change from APD Antiquities, Inc. to American Cordillera Mining Corporation (“AMCOR” or “the Company”) to reflect its intended acquisition of Northern Adventures, Inc., effective upon the filing of the Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of the State of Nevada on December 12, 2012.

The Company discontinued its prior antiquity business upon consummation of the asset purchase agreement (“Asset Purchase Agreement”) with Northern Adventures, Inc. and all of the shareholders of Northern Adventures, Inc., on December 28, 2012.

Northern Adventures, Inc.

Northern Adventures, Inc. (“NAI”) was incorporated on March 30, 2012 under the laws of the State of Nevada. NAI engages in mining exploration in North America.

Acquisition of Northern Adventures, Inc. Treated as a Reverse Acquisition

On December 28, 2012 (the "Closing Date"), an asset purchase agreement (“Asset Purchase Agreement”) was executed, by and among AMCOR, AMCOR Exploration, Inc. (a wholly owned subsidiary of AMCOR) and Northern Adventures, Inc. (“NAI”). In consideration for the acquisition of all of the mining assets that comprise the “Northern Adventures, Inc.” business (the “NAI Mining Assets”), AMCOR (i) exchanged debt owed by NAI in the amount of $382,500 and accrued interest in the amount of $30,564 through November 30, 2012, and (ii) issued 71,500,000 shares of AMCOR restricted common stock, valued at par value $0.001 or $71,500, to NAI, which was subsequently transferred to NAI shareholders. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Asset Purchase Agreement, the Company acquired all of NAI’s mining assets made up of the following nine projects which will be owned outright by the Company or controlled pursuant to mineral lease agreements or options to acquire leases: 1) an agreement to explore and acquire the Bayhorse silver mine consisting of 3 patented and 21 unpatented claims located in Baker County, Oregon; 2) a lease agreement pertaining to 37 unpatented mining claims located on Quartz Creek, in Mineral County, Montana; 3) a lease agreement pertaining to 58 unpatented mining claims located Trout Creek, in Mineral County, Montana; 4) a lease agreement pertaining to 18 unpatented mining claims referred to as the Vienna prospect locate in Shoshone County, Idaho; 5) a lease agreement pertaining to the Monitor-Richmond and Copper Age mines consisting of a total of 20 unpatented mining claims located in Shoshone County, Idaho; 6) the option to acquire ten leases granted by the State of Washington covering 4,664 acres of state mineral leases and 27 unpatented mining claims known as the Torada Creek Project in the Bodie Mining District in Okanogan County, Washington; 7) acquisition agreements pertaining to 15 unpatented mining claims located in Stevens County, Washington referred to as the Box Group; 8) acquisition agreements pertaining to 15 unpatented mining claims located in Stevens County, Washington referred to as the McKinley-McNally Property; and 9) directly owned all right, title, and claim to 26 unpatented claims commonly known as the North Moccasin Project or Plum Claims located in Fergus County, Montana.

- 7 -

Immediately following the consummation of the Asset Purchase Agreement: (i) the former security holders of Northern Adventures, Inc. common stock had an approximate 80.6% voting interest in the Company and the Company stockholders retained an approximate 19.4% voting interest, (ii) the former board of directors and executive management team of Northern Adventures, Inc. remained as the only continuing board of directors and executive management team for the Company, and (iii) the Company’s ongoing operations consisted solely of the ongoing operations of Northern Adventures, Inc. Based primarily on these factors, for financial statement reporting purposes, the Acquisition was accounted for as a reverse acquisition and a recapitalization, the merger between the Company and NAI has been treated as a reverse acquisition with NAI deemed the accounting acquirer and the Company deemed the accounting acquiree under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with Section 805-10-55 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. The reverse acquisition is deemed a capital transaction and the net assets of NAI (the accounting acquirer) are carried forward to the Company (the legal acquirer and the reporting entity) at their carrying value before the acquisition. The acquisition process utilizes the capital structure of the Company and the assets and liabilities of NAI which are recorded at their historical costs. The equity of the Company is the historical equity of NAI retroactively restated to reflect the number of shares issued by the Company in the transaction. As a result, these financial statements reflect the historical results of Northern Adventures, Inc. prior to the Acquisition, and the combined results of the Company following the Acquisition.

Note 2 – Significant and Critical Accounting Policies and Practices

The Management of the Company is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies and the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. Critical accounting policies and practices are those that are both most important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results and require management’s most difficult, subjective, or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effects of matters that are inherently uncertain. The Company’s significant and critical accounting policies and practices are disclosed below as required by generally accepted accounting principles.

Basis of Presentation - Unaudited Interim Financial Information

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and related notes have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information, and with the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) to Form 10-Q and Article 8 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. The unaudited interim financial statements furnished reflect all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) which are, in the opinion of management, necessary to a fair statement of the results for the interim periods presented. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of the results for the full year. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the year ended November 30, 2014 and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on ~~April~~July 81, 2015.

Reclassification

Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on reported losses.

Fiscal Year End

On December 31, 2012, the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) approved a change in the Company’s fiscal year end from December 31 to November 30.

Exploration Stage Company

The Company has established the existence of mineralized material; however, it has not established proven or probable reserves, as defined by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under Industry Guide 7, through the completion of a “final” or “bankable” feasibility study for mineralized material. As a result, the Company remains in the Exploration Stage as defined under Industry Guide 7, and will continue to remain in the Exploration Stage until such time proven or probable reserves have been established.

The Company has elected to adopt early application of Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-10, Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements. Upon adoption, the Company no longer presents or discloses inception-to-date information and other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915.

Use of Estimates and Assumptions and Critical Accounting Estimates and Assumptions

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).

- 8 -

contingent assets and liabilities at the date(s) of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period(s).

Critical accounting estimates are estimates for which (a) the nature of the estimate is material due to the levels of subjectivity and judgment necessary to account for highly uncertain matters or the susceptibility of such matters to change and (b) the impact of the estimate on financial condition or operating performance is material. The Company’s critical accounting estimates and assumptions affecting the financial statements were:

(i)

Assumption as a going concern: Management assumes that the Company will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

(ii)

Fair value of long-lived assets: Fair value is generally determined using the asset’s expected future discounted cash flows or market value, if readily determinable. If long-lived assets are determined to be recoverable, but the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.

- 8 -

remaining estimated useful lives are shorter than originally estimated, the net book values of the long-lived assets are depreciated over the newly determined remaining estimated useful lives. The Company considers the following to be some examples of important indicators that may trigger an impairment review: (i) significant under-performance or losses of assets relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; (ii) significant changes in the manner or use of assets or in the Company’s overall strategy with respect to the manner or use of the acquired assets or changes in the Company’s overall business strategy; (iii) significant negative industry or economic trends; (iv) increased competitive pressures; (v) a significant decline in the Company’s stock price for a sustained period of time; and (vi) regulatory changes. The Company evaluates acquired assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.

(iii)

Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets: Management assumes that the realization of the Company’s net deferred tax assets resulting from its net operating loss (“NOL”) carry–forwards for Federal income tax purposes that may be offset against future taxable income was not considered more likely than not and accordingly, the potential tax benefits of the net loss carry-forwards are offset by a full valuation allowance. Management made this assumption based on (a) the Company has incurred recurring losses, (b) general economic conditions, and (c) its ability to raise additional funds to support its daily operations by way of a public or private offering, among other factors.

These significant accounting estimates or assumptions bear the risk of change due to the fact that there are uncertainties attached to these estimates or assumptions, and certain estimates or assumptions are difficult to measure or value.

Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources.

Management regularly evaluates the key factors and assumptions used to develop the estimates utilizing currently available information, changes in facts and circumstances, historical experience and reasonable assumptions. After such evaluations, if deemed appropriate, those estimates are adjusted accordingly.

Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Principles of Consolidation

The Company applies the guidance of Topic 810 “Consolidation” of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification ("ASC") to determine whether and how to consolidate another entity. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-10 all majority-owned subsidiaries—all entities in which a parent has a controlling financial interest—shall be consolidated except (1) when control does not rest with the parent, the majority owner; (2) if the parent is a broker-dealer within the scope of Topic 940 and control is likely to be temporary; (3) consolidation by an investment company within the scope of Topic 946 of a non-investment-company investee. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 810-10-15-8 the usual condition for a controlling financial interest is ownership of a majority voting interest, and, therefore, as a general rule ownership by one reporting entity, directly or indirectly, of more than 50 percent of the outstanding voting shares of another entity is a condition pointing toward consolidation. The power to control may also exist with a lesser percentage of ownership, for example, by contract, lease, agreement with other stockholders, or by court decree. The Company consolidates all less-than-majority-owned subsidiaries, if any, in which the parent’s power to control exists.

The Company's consolidated subsidiaries and/or entities are as follows:

- 9 -


Name of consolidated subsidiary or entity	State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization	Date of incorporation or formation (date of acquisition, if applicable)	Attributable interest
Northern Adventures, Inc. (“NAI”)	The State of Nevada	March 30, 2012	100%

American Cordillera Mining Corp.	The State of Nevada	July 23, 1996 (December 28, 2012)	100%

The consolidated financial statements include all accounts of NAI as of reporting period end date and for the reporting periods then ended.

All inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated.

- 9 -

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company follows paragraph 825-10-50-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for disclosures about fair value of its financial instruments and has adopted paragraph 820-10-35-37 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Paragraph 820-10-35-37”) to measure the fair value of its financial instruments. Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements and related disclosures, Paragraph 820-10-35-37 establishes a fair value hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three (3) broad levels. The three (3) levels of fair value hierarchy defined by Paragraph 820-10-35-37 are described below:


Level 1		Quoted market prices available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

Level 2		Pricing inputs other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reporting date.

Level 3		Pricing inputs that are generally observable inputs and not corroborated by market data.

Financial assets are considered Level 3 when their fair values are determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies or similar techniques and at least one significant model assumption or input is unobservable.

The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within more than one level described above, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

The carrying amounts of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities, such as cash, accounts payable, and accrued expenses, approximate their fair values because of the short maturity of these instruments.

Transactions involving related parties cannot be presumed to be carried out on an arm's-length basis, as the requisite conditions of competitive, free-market dealings may not exist. Representations about transactions with related parties, if made, shall not imply that the related party transactions were consummated on terms equivalent to those that prevail in arm's-length transactions unless such representations can be substantiated.

Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis

Level 1 Financial Assets – Marketable Securities

The Company uses Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy to measure the fair value of the marketable securities and marks the available for sale marketable securities at fair value in the statement of financial position at each balance sheet date and reports the unrealized holding gains and losses for available-for-sale securities in other comprehensive income (loss), until realized, provided the unrealized holding gains and losses is temporary. If the fair value of an investment is less than its cost basis at the balance sheet date of the reporting period for which impairment is assessed, and it is determined that the impairment is other than temporary, then an impairment loss is recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment’s cost and its fair value at the balance sheet date of the reporting period.

- 10 -

impairment loss is recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment’s cost and its fair value at the balance sheet date of the reporting period.

Carrying Value, Recoverability and Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

The Company has adopted Section 360-10-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its long-lived assets. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-17 an impairment loss shall be recognized only if the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable and exceeds its fair value. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) is not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset (asset group). That assessment shall be based on the carrying amount of the asset (asset group) at the date it is tested for recoverability. An impairment loss shall be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset (asset group) exceeds its fair value. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-20 if an impairment loss is recognized, the adjusted carrying amount of a long-lived asset shall be its new cost basis. For a depreciable long-lived asset, the new cost basis shall be depreciated (amortized) over the remaining useful life of that asset. Restoration of a previously recognized impairment loss is prohibited.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 360-10-35-21 the Company’s long-lived asset (asset group) is tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company considers the following to be some examples of such events or changes in circumstances that may trigger an impairment review: (a) significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset (asset group); (b) A significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which a long-lived asset (asset group) is being used or in its physical condition; (c) A significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset (asset group), including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; (d) An accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a long-lived asset (asset group); (e) A current-period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset (asset group); and (f) A current expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived asset (asset group) will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. The Company tests its long-lived assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.

- 10 -

group) is being used or in its physical condition; (c) A significant adverse change in legal factors or in the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset (asset group), including an adverse action or assessment by a regulator; (d) An accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a long-lived asset (asset group); (e) A current-period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of a long-lived asset (asset group); and (f) A current expectation that, more likely than not, a long-lived asset (asset group) will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. The Company tests its long-lived assets for potential impairment indicators at least annually and more frequently upon the occurrence of such events.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 360-10-45-4 and 360-10-45-5 an impairment loss recognized for a long-lived asset (asset group) to be held and used shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amount of that loss. A gain or loss recognized on the sale of a long-lived asset (disposal group) that is not a component of an entity shall be included in income from continuing operations before income taxes in the income statement of a business entity. If a subtotal such as income from operations is presented, it shall include the amounts of those gains or losses.

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Marketable Debt and Equity Securities, Available for Sale

The Company accounts for marketable debt and equity securities, available for sale, in accordance with sub-topic 320-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Sub-topic 320-10”).

Pursuant to Paragraph 320-10-35-1, investments in debt securities that are classified as available for sale and equity securities that have readily determinable fair values that are classified as available for sale shall be measured subsequently at fair value in the consolidated balance sheets at each balance sheet date. Unrealized holding gains and losses for available-for-sale securities (including those classified as current assets) shall be excluded from earnings and reported in other comprehensive income until realized except an available-for-sale security that is designated as being hedged in a fair value hedge, from which all or a portion of the unrealized holding gain and loss of shall be recognized in earnings during the period of the hedge, pursuant to paragraphs 815-25-35-1 through 815-25-35-4.

The Company follows Paragraphs 320-10-35-17 through 320-10-35-34E and assess whether an investment is impaired in each reporting period. An investment is impaired if the fair value of the investment is less than its cost. Impairment indicators include, but are not limited to the following: a. a significant deterioration in the earnings performance, credit rating, asset quality, or business prospects of the investee; b. a significant adverse change in the regulatory, economic, or technological environment of the investee; c. a significant adverse change in the general market condition of either the geographic area or the industry in which the investee operates; d. a bona fide offer to purchase (whether solicited or unsolicited), an offer by the investee to sell, or a completed auction process for the same or similar security for an amount less than the cost of the investment; e. factors that raise significant concerns about the investee's ability to continue as a going concern, such as negative cash flows from operations, working capital deficiencies, or noncompliance with statutory capital requirements or debt covenants. If the fair value of an investment is less than its cost basis at the balance sheet date of the reporting period for which impairment is assessed, the impairment is either temporary or other than temporary. Pursuant to Paragraph 320-10-35-34, if it is determined that the impairment is other than temporary, then an impairment loss shall be recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment’s cost and its fair value at the balance sheet date of the reporting period for which the assessment is made. The measurement of the impairment shall not include partial recoveries after the balance sheet date. The fair value of the investment would then become the new basis of the investment and shall not be adjusted for subsequent recoveries in fair value. For presentation purpose, the entity shall present the total other-than-temporary impairment in the statement of earnings with an offset for the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment that is recognized in other comprehensive income, in accordance with paragraph 320-10-35-34D, if any, pursuant to Paragraph 320-10-45-8A; and separately present, in the financial statement in which the components of accumulated other comprehensive income are reported, amounts recognized therein related to held-to-maturity and available-for-sale debt securities for which a portion of an other-than-temporary impairment has been recognized in earnings pursuant to Paragraph 320-10-45-9A. Pursuant to Paragraphs 320-10-35-36 and 37 the entire change in the fair value of foreign-currency-denominated available-for-sale debt securities shall be reported in other comprehensive income and An entity holding a foreign-currency-denominated available-for-sale debt security is required to consider, among other things, changes in market interest rates and foreign exchange rates since acquisition in determining whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. Pursuant to FASB ASC Paragraph 320-10-50-2, the entity shall disclose all of the following by major security type as of each date for which a statement of financial position is presented: a. cost basis (net of amortization of debt discount for debt securities), aggregate fair value, total other-than-temporary impairment recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income; b. Total gains for securities with net gains in accumulated other comprehensive income; c. Total losses for

- 11 -

the balance sheet date of the reporting period for which impairment is assessed, the impairment is either temporary or other than temporary. Pursuant to Paragraph 320-10-35-34, if it is determined that the impairment is other than temporary, then an impairment loss shall be recognized in earnings equal to the entire difference between the investment’s cost and its fair value at the balance sheet date of the reporting period for which the assessment is made. The measurement of the impairment shall not include partial recoveries after the balance sheet date. The fair value of the investment would then become the new basis of the investment and shall not be adjusted for subsequent recoveries in fair value. For presentation purpose, the entity shall present the total other-than-temporary impairment in the statement of earnings with an offset for the amount of the total other-than-temporary impairment that is recognized in other comprehensive income, in accordance with paragraph 320-10-35-34D, if any, pursuant to Paragraph 320-10-45-8A; and separately present, in the financial statement in which the components of accumulated other comprehensive income are reported, amounts recognized therein related to held-to-maturity and available-for-sale debt securities for which a portion of an other-than-temporary impairment has been recognized in earnings pursuant to Paragraph 320-10-45-9A. Pursuant to Paragraphs 320-10-35-36 and 37 the entire change in the fair value of foreign-currency-denominated available-for-sale debt securities shall be reported in other comprehensive income and An entity holding a foreign-currency-denominated available-for-sale debt security is required to consider, among other things, changes in market interest rates and foreign exchange rates since acquisition in determining whether an other-than-temporary impairment has occurred. Pursuant to FASB ASC Paragraph 320-10-50-2, the entity shall disclose all of the following by major security type as of each date for which a statement of financial position is presented: a. cost basis (net of amortization of debt discount for debt securities), aggregate fair value, total other-than-temporary impairment recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income; b. Total gains for securities with net ~~gains in accumulated other comprehensive income; c. Total~~ losses ~~for securities with net losses~~ in accumulated other comprehensive income; and d. Information about the contractual maturities of those securities as of the date of the most recent statement of financial position presented.

Mineral Rights/Properties

The Company follows Section 930 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for its mineral properties. Costs of acquisition and option costs of mineral rights/properties are capitalized upon acquisition pending determination of whether the drilling or lab testing has found proven reserves, as defined by the SEC under Industry Guide 7, through the completion of a “final” or “bankable” feasibility study. If a mineral ore body is discovered, capitalized costs will be amortized on a unit-of-production basis following the commencement of production. Otherwise, capitalized acquisition costs are expensed when it is determined that the mineral property has no future economic value. General exploration costs and costs to maintain rights and leases, including rights of access to lands for geophysical work and salaries, equipment, and supplies for geologists and geophysical crews are expensed as incurred. When it is determined that a mining deposit can be economically and legally extracted or produced based on established proven and probable reserves, further exploration costs and development costs as well as interest costs relating to exploration and development projects that require greater than six (6) months to be readied for their intended use, incurred after such determination, will be capitalized. The establishment of proven and probable reserves is based on results of final feasibility studies which indicate whether a property is economically feasible. Upon commencement of commercial production, capitalized costs will be transferred to the appropriate asset categories and amortized on a unit-of-production basis. Where proven and probable reserves have not been established, such capitalized expenditures are depleted over the estimated production life, upon commencement of extraction, using the straight-line method. Capitalized costs, net of salvage values, relating to a deposit which is abandoned or considered uneconomic for the foreseeable future will be written off. The sale of a partial interest in a proved property is accounted for as a cost recovery and no gain or loss is recognized as long as this treatment does not significantly affect the unit-of-production amortization rate. A gain or loss will be recognized for all other sales of proved properties and will be classified in other operating revenues. Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense, and renewals and betterments are capitalized to the appropriate property and equipment accounts.

The provision for depreciation, depletion and amortization (“DD&A”) of mineral properties will be calculated on a property-by-property basis using the unit-of-production method. Taken into consideration in the calculation of DD&A are estimated future dismantlement, restoration and abandonment costs, which are net of estimated salvage values. Upon becoming fully amortized, the related cost and accumulated amortization are removed from the accounts.

To date, the Company has not established the commercial feasibility of any exploration prospects; therefore, all general exploration costs, if any, are being expensed.

Mineral Exploration and Mine Development Costs

All mineral exploration and pre-extraction expenditures are expensed as incurred until such time the Company exits the Exploration Stage by establishing proven or probable reserves. Mine development costs incurred to develop mineral deposits, to expand the capacity of mines or to develop mine areas substantially in advance of production are capitalized once proven and probable reserves exist, and the property is determined to be a commercially mineable property. Costs incurred to maintain current production or to maintain assets on a standby basis are charged to operations. If the Company does not continue with exploration after the completion of the feasibility study, the cost of mineral rights will be expensed at that time. Costs of abandoned projects, including related property and equipment costs, are charged to mining costs.

- 12 -

Restoration Costs (Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations)

Various federal and state mining laws and regulations require the Company to reclaim the surface areas and restore underground water quality for its mine projects to the pre-existing mine area average quality after the completion of mining.

In accordance with ASC 410, Asset Retirement and Environmental Obligations, the Company capitalizes the measured fair value of asset retirement and environmental obligations to mineral rights and properties. ASC 410 requires the Company to record a liability for the present value of the estimated future site restoration and environmental remediation costs with corresponding increase to the carrying amount of the related mineral rights and properties. The asset retirement and environmental obligations are accreted to an undiscounted value until the time at which they are expected to be settled. The accretion expense is charged to earnings and the actual retirement costs are recorded against the asset retirement obligations when incurred. Any difference between the recorded asset retirement obligations and the actual retirement costs incurred will be recorded as a gain or loss in the period of settlement.

Environmental expenditures that relate to ongoing environmental and reclamation programs will be charged against statements of operations as incurred or capitalized and amortized depending upon their future economic benefits. Future site restoration and environmental remediation costs, which include extraction equipment removal, site restoration and environmental remediation, are accrued at the end of each reporting period based on management's best estimate of the costs expected to be incurred for each project. Such estimates are determined by the Company's engineering studies which consider the costs of future surface and groundwater activities, current regulations, actual expenses incurred, and technology and industry standards.

- 12 -

Such estimates are determined by the Company's engineering studies which consider the costs of future surface and groundwater activities, current regulations, actual expenses incurred, and technology and industry standards.

On a quarterly basis, the Company reviews the assumptions used to estimate the expected cash flows required to settle the asset retirement obligations, including changes in estimated probabilities, amounts and timing of the settlement of the asset retirement and environmental obligations, as well as changes in the legal obligation requirements at each of its mineral projects. Changes in any one or more of these assumptions may cause revision of asset retirement obligations for the corresponding assets.

Related Parties

The Company follows subtopic 850-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the identification of related parties and disclosure of related party transactions.

Pursuant to Section 850-10-20 the related parties include a. affiliates of the Company (“Affiliate” means, with respect to any specified Person, any other Person that, directly or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, is controlled by or is under common control with such Person, as such terms are used in and construed under Rule 405 under the Securities Act); b. entities for which investments in their equity securities would be required, absent the election of the fair value option under the Fair Value Option Subsection of Section 825–10–15, to be accounted for by the equity method by the investing entity; c. trusts for the benefit of employees, such as pension and profit-sharing trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management; d. principal owners of the Company; e. management of the Company; f. other parties with which the Company may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests; and g. other parties that can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or that have an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.

The financial statements shall include disclosures of material related party transactions, other than compensation arrangements, expense allowances, and other similar items in the ordinary course of business. However, disclosure of transactions that are eliminated in the preparation of consolidated or combined financial statements is not required in those statements. The disclosures shall include: a. the nature of the relationship(s) involved; b. a description of the transactions, including transactions to which no amounts or nominal amounts were ascribed, for each of the periods for which income statements are presented, and such other information deemed necessary to an understanding of the effects of the transactions on the financial statements; c. the dollar amounts of transactions for each of the periods for which income statements are presented and the effects of any change in the method of establishing the terms from that used in the preceding period; and d. amounts due from or to related parties as of the date of each balance sheet presented and, if not otherwise apparent, the terms and manner of settlement.

Commitments and Contingencies

The Company follows subtopic 450-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report accounting for contingencies. Certain conditions may exist as of the date the financial statements are issued, which may result in a loss to the Company but which will only be resolved when one or more future events occur or fail to occur. The Company assesses such contingent liabilities, and such assessment inherently involves an exercise of judgment. In assessing loss contingencies related to legal proceedings that are pending against the Company or un-asserted claims that may result in such proceedings, the Company evaluates the perceived merits of any legal proceedings or un-asserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

- 13 -

of any legal proceedings or un-asserted claims as well as the perceived merits of the amount of relief sought or expected to be sought therein.

If the assessment of a contingency indicates that it is probable that a material loss has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be estimated, then the estimated liability would be accrued in the Company’s financial statements. If the assessment indicates that a potential material loss contingency is not probable but is reasonably possible, or is probable but cannot be estimated, then the nature of the contingent liability, and an estimate of the range of possible losses, if determinable and material, would be disclosed.

Loss contingencies considered remote are generally not disclosed unless they involve guarantees, in which case the guarantees would be disclosed.

Foreign Currency Transactions

The Company applies the guidelines as set out in Section 830-20-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Section 830-20-35”) for foreign currency transactions. Pursuant to Section 830-20-35 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, foreign currency transactions are transactions denominated in currencies other than U.S. Dollar, the Company’s reporting currency or Canadian Dollar, the Company’s operating functional currency. Foreign currency transactions may produce receivables or payables that are fixed in terms of the amount of foreign currency that will be received or paid. A change in exchange rates between the functional currency and the currency in which a transaction is denominated increases or decreases the expected amount of functional currency cash flows upon settlement of the transaction. That increase or decrease in expected functional currency cash flows is a foreign currency transaction gain or loss that generally shall be included in determining net income for the period in which the exchange rate changes. Likewise, a transaction gain or loss (measured from the transaction date or the most recent intervening balance sheet date, whichever is later) realized upon settlement of a foreign currency transaction generally shall be included in determining net income for the period in which the transaction is settled. The exceptions to this requirement for inclusion in net income of transaction gains and losses pertain to certain intercompany transactions and to transactions that are designated as, and effective as, economic hedges of net investments and foreign currency commitments. Pursuant to Section 830-20-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the following shall apply to all foreign currency transactions of an enterprise and its investees: (a) at the date the transaction is recognized, each asset, liability, revenue, expense, gain, or loss arising from the transaction shall be measured and recorded in the functional currency of the recording entity by use of the exchange rate in effect at that date as defined in section 830-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification; and (b) at each balance sheet date, recorded balances that are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency or reporting currency of the recording entity shall be adjusted to reflect the current exchange rate.

- 13 -

functional currency and the currency in which a transaction is denominated increases or decreases the expected amount of functional currency cash flows upon settlement of the transaction. That increase or decrease in expected functional currency cash flows is a foreign currency transaction gain or loss that generally shall be included in determining net income for the period in which the exchange rate changes. Likewise, a transaction gain or loss (measured from the transaction date or the most recent intervening balance sheet date, whichever is later) realized upon settlement of a foreign currency transaction generally shall be included in determining net income for the period in which the transaction is settled. The exceptions to this requirement for inclusion in net income of transaction gains and losses pertain to certain intercompany transactions and to transactions that are designated as, and effective as, economic hedges of net investments and foreign currency commitments. Pursuant to Section 830-20-25 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the following shall apply to all foreign currency transactions of an enterprise and its investees: (a) at the date the transaction is recognized, each asset, liability, revenue, expense, gain, or loss arising from the transaction shall be measured and recorded in the functional currency of the recording entity by use of the exchange rate in effect at that date as defined in section 830-10-20 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification; and (b) at each balance sheet date, recorded balances that are denominated in currencies other than the functional currency or reporting currency of the recording entity shall be adjusted to reflect the current exchange rate.

Revenue Recognition

The Company follows paragraph 605-10-S99-1 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for revenue recognition. The Company will recognize revenue when it is realized or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue realized or realizable and earned when all of the following criteria are met: (i) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (ii) the product has been shipped or the services have been rendered to the customer, (iii) the sales price is fixed or determinable, and (iv) collectability is reasonably assured. In addition to the aforementioned general policy, the following are the specific revenue recognition policies for each major category of revenue:

(i)

Sale of metals or metal bearing concentrate: The Company will derive its revenue from sales contracts with customers with revenues being generated upon the shipment of merchandise. Persuasive evidence of an arrangement will be demonstrated via sales invoice or contract; product delivery is evidenced by warehouse shipping log as well as a signed bill of lading from the vessel or rail company and title transfers upon shipment, based on free on board (“FOB”) warehouse terms; the sales price to the customer is fixed upon acceptance of the signed purchase order or contract and there is no separate sales rebate, discount, or volume incentive. Revenue from the sale of metals or metal bearing concentrate may be subject to adjustment upon final settlement of estimated metal or metal bearing concentrate prices, weights and assays, and are recorded as adjustments to revenue in the period of final settlement of prices, weights and assays; such adjustments are typically not material in relation to the initial invoice amounts.

(ii)

Mineral production royalty: The Company derives its mineral production royalty from joint venture arrangements with regard to the exploration of mineral rights the Company owns or has under its control. The Company recognizes (i) annual advance minimum royalty as revenue in the period per joint venture arrangements and (ii) mineral production royalty as revenue in the period when earned based on monthly or quarterly production report from joint venture arrangements provided the collectability is reasonable assured or recognizes revenues upon receipts of advance minimum royalty and mineral production royalty payments if the collectability is reasonable assured.

Shipping and Handling Costs

- 14 -

The Company accounts for shipping and handling fees in accordance with paragraph 605-45-45-19 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. While amounts charged to customers for shipping products are included in revenues, the related costs are classified in cost of goods sold as incurred.

Stock-Based Compensation for Obtaining Employee Services

The Company accounts for share-based payment transactions issued to employees under the guidance of the Topic 718 Compensation—Stock Compensation of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC Topic 718”).

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-30-2 and 718-10-30-3 a share-based payment transaction with employees shall be measured based on the fair value of the equity instruments issued and an entity shall account for the compensation cost from share-based payment transactions with employees in accordance with the fair value-based method, i.e., the cost of services received from employees in exchange for awards of share-based compensation generally shall be measured based on the grant-date fair value of the equity instruments issued or the fair value of the liabilities incurred/settled.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-30-6 and 718-10-30-9 the measurement objective for equity instruments awarded to employees is to estimate the fair value at the grant date of the equity instruments that the entity is obligated to issue when employees have rendered the requisite service and satisfied any other conditions necessary to earn the right to benefit from the instruments (for example, to exercise share options). That estimate is based on the share price and other pertinent factors, such as expected volatility, at the grant date. As such, the fair value of an equity share option or similar instrument shall be estimated using a valuation technique such as an option pricing model. For this purpose, a similar instrument is one whose fair value differs from its intrinsic value, that is, an instrument that has time value.

- 14 -

exercise share options). That estimate is based on the share price and other pertinent factors, such as expected volatility, at the grant date. As such, the fair value of an equity share option or similar instrument shall be estimated using a valuation technique such as an option pricing model. For this purpose, a similar instrument is one whose fair value differs from its intrinsic value, that is, an instrument that has time value.

If the Company’s common shares are traded in one of the national exchanges the grant-date share price of the Company’s common stock will be used to measure the fair value of the common shares issued, however, if the Company’s common shares are thinly traded the use of share prices established in its most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

The Company estimates the fair value of share options and similar instruments on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing valuation model. The ranges of assumptions for inputs are as follows:

· Expected term of share options and similar instruments: The expected life of options and similar instruments represents the period of time the option and/or warrant are expected to be outstanding. Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and employees’ expected exercise and post-vesting employment termination behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments. Pursuant to paragraph 718-10-S99-1, it may be appropriate to use the simplified method, i.e., expected term = ((vesting term + original contractual term) / 2), if (i) A company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term due to the limited period of time its equity shares have been publicly traded; (ii) A company significantly changes the terms of its share option grants or the types of employees that receive share option grants such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term; or (iii) A company has or expects to have significant structural changes in its business such that its historical exercise data may no longer provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. The Company uses the simplified method to calculate expected term of share options and similar instruments as the company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. · Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility. If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market. · Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends. An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments. · Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.

- 15 -

· Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-30-11 and 718-10-30-17 a restriction that stems from the forfeitability of instruments to which employees have not yet earned the right, such as the inability either to exercise a non-vested equity share option or to sell non-vested shares, is not reflected in estimating the fair value of the related instruments at the grant date. Instead, those restrictions are taken into account by recognizing compensation cost only for awards for which employees render the requisite service and a non-vested equity share or non-vested equity share unit awarded to an employee shall be measured at its fair value as if it were vested and issued on the grant date.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 718-10-35-2 and 718-10-35-3 the compensation cost for an award of share-based employee compensation classified as equity shall be recognized over the requisite service period, with a corresponding credit to equity (generally, paid-in capital). The requisite service period is the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for an award, which often is the vesting period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized at the end of the requisite service period for an award of share-based compensation shall be based on the number of instruments for which the requisite service has been rendered (that is, for which the requisite service period has been completed). An entity shall base initial accruals of compensation cost on the estimated number of instruments for which the requisite service is expected to be rendered. That estimate shall be revised if subsequent information indicates that the actual number of instruments is likely to differ from previous estimates. The cumulative effect on current and prior periods of a change in the estimated number of instruments for which the requisite service is expected to be or has been rendered shall be recognized in compensation cost in the period of the change. Previously recognized compensation cost shall not be reversed if an employee share option (or share unit) for which the requisite service has been rendered expires unexercised (or unconverted).

- 15 -

is expected to be or has been rendered shall be recognized in compensation cost in the period of the change. Previously recognized compensation cost shall not be reversed if an employee share option (or share unit) for which the requisite service has been rendered expires unexercised (or unconverted).

Under the requirement of ASC Paragraph 718-10-35-8 the Company made a policy decision to recognize compensation cost for an award with only service conditions that has a graded vesting schedule on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for the entire award.

Equity Instruments Issued to Parties Other Than Employees for Acquiring Goods or Services

The Company accounts for equity instruments issued to parties other than employees for acquiring goods or services under guidance of Sub-topic 505-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Sub-topic 505-50”).

Pursuant to ASC Section 505-50-30, all transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The measurement date used to determine the fair value of the equity instrument issued is the earlier of the date on which the performance is complete or the date on which it is probable that performance will occur. If the Company’s common shares are traded in one of the national exchanges the grant-date share price of the Company’s common stock will be used to measure the fair value of the common shares issued, however, if the Company’s common shares are thinly traded the use of share prices established in the Company’s most recent private placement memorandum (“PPM”), or weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market.

· Expected term of share options and similar instruments: Pursuant to Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(i) of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification the expected term of share options and similar instruments represents the period of time the options and similar instruments are expected to be outstanding taking into consideration of the contractual term of the instruments and holder’s expected exercise behavior into the fair value (or calculated value) of the instruments. The Company uses historical data to estimate holder’s expected exercise behavior. If the Company is a newly formed corporation or shares of the Company are thinly traded the contractual term of the share options and similar instruments is used as the expected term of share options and similar instruments as the Company does not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. · Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall disclose the reasons why it is not practicable for the Company to estimate the expected volatility of its share price, the appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index. The Company uses the average historical volatility of the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar instruments as its expected volatility. If shares of a company are thinly traded the use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate than the use of daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations for such shares could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market. · Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends. An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted-average expected dividends. The expected dividend yield is based on the Company’s current dividend yield as the best estimate of projected dividend yield for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments. · Risk-free rate(s). An entity that uses a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments.

Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-25-7, if fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (no specific performance is required by the grantee to retain those equity instruments), then, because of the elimination of any obligation on the part of the counterparty to earn the equity instruments, a measurement date has been reached. A grantor shall recognize the equity instruments when they are issued (in most cases, when the agreement is entered into). Whether the corresponding cost is an immediate expense or a prepaid asset (or whether the debit should be characterized as contra-equity under the requirements of paragraph 505-50-45-1) depends on the specific facts and circumstances. Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-45-1, a grantor may conclude that an asset (other than a note or a receivable) has been received in return for fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are issued at the date the grantor and grantee enter into an agreement for goods or services (and no specific performance is required by the grantee in order to retain those equity instruments). Such an asset shall not be displayed as contra-equity by the grantor of the equity instruments. The transferability (or lack thereof) of the equity

- 16 -

·instruments Expected volatility of the entity’s shares and the method used to estimate it. Pursuant to ASC Paragraph 718-10-50-2(f)(2)(ii) a thinly-traded or nonpublic entity that uses the calculated value method shall ~~disclose the reasons why it is~~ not ~~practicable~~affect ~~for~~ the ~~Company~~balance tosheet ~~estimate~~display ~~the expected volatility~~ of ~~its share price,~~ the ~~appropriate industry sector index that it has selected, the reasons for selecting that particular index, and how it has calculated historical volatility using that index~~asset. This ~~The~~guidance ~~Company~~is ~~uses~~limited ~~the~~to ~~average~~transactions ~~historical~~in ~~volatility~~which ofequity ~~the comparable companies over the expected contractual life of the share options or similar~~ instruments ~~as its expected volatility. If shares of a company~~ are ~~thinly~~transferred ~~traded~~to ~~the~~other ~~use of weekly or monthly price observations would generally be more appropriate~~ than ~~the~~employees ~~use~~in ofexchange ~~daily price observations as the volatility calculation using daily observations~~ for ~~such~~goods ~~shares~~or ~~could be artificially inflated due to a larger spread between the bid and asked quotes and lack of consistent trading in the market~~services. ·Section Expected annual rate of quarterly dividends. An entity that uses a method that employs different dividend rates during the contractual term shall disclose the range of expected dividends used and the weighted505-~~average~~50-30 ~~expected~~provides ~~dividends.~~guidance ~~The expected dividend yield is based~~ on the ~~Company’s~~determination ~~current~~of ~~dividend yield as~~ the ~~best~~measurement ~~estimate~~date ~~of projected dividend yield~~ for ~~periods~~transactions ~~within the expected term of the share options and similar instruments. · Risk-free rate(s). An entity~~ that ~~uses~~are a method that employs different risk-free rates shall disclose the range of risk-free rates used. The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for periods within the ~~expected~~scope ~~term~~ of ~~the~~this ~~share options and similar instruments~~Subtopic.

Pursuant to Paragraphs 505-50-25-8 and 505-50-25-9, an entity may grant fully vested, non-forfeitable equity instruments that are exercisable by the grantee only after a specified period of time if the terms of the agreement provide for earlier exercisability if the grantee achieves specified performance conditions. Any measured cost of the transaction shall be recognized in the same period(s) and in the same manner as if the entity had paid cash for the goods or services or used cash rebates as a sales discount instead of paying with, or using, the equity instruments. A recognized asset, expense, or sales discount shall not be reversed if a stock option that the counterparty has the right to exercise expires unexercised.

Pursuant to ASC paragraph 505-50-30-S99-1, if the Company receives a right to receive future services in exchange for unvested, forfeitable equity instruments, those equity instruments are treated as unissued for accounting purposes until the future services are received (that is, the instruments are not considered issued until they vest). Consequently, there would be no recognition at the measurement date and no entry should be recorded.

Deferred Tax Assets and Income Tax Provision

The Company follows paragraph 740-10-30-2 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are based on the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance to the extent management concludes it is more likely than not that the assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the Statements of Operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company adopted the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Paragraph 740-10-25-13.addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under paragraph 740-10-25-13, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent (50%) likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Paragraph 740-10-25-13 also provides guidance on de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties on income taxes, accounting in interim periods and requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13.

- 17 -

requires increased disclosures. The Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of paragraph 740-10-25-13.

The estimated future tax effects of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities are reported in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets, as well as tax credit carry-backs and carry-forwards. The Company periodically reviews the recoverability of deferred tax assets recorded on its consolidated balance sheets and provides valuation allowances as management deems necessary.

Management makes judgments as to the interpretation of the tax laws that might be challenged upon an audit and cause changes to previous estimates of tax liability. In addition, the Company operates within multiple taxing jurisdictions and is subject to audit in these jurisdictions. In management’s opinion, adequate provisions for income taxes have been made for all years. If actual taxable income by tax jurisdiction varies from estimates, additional allowances or reversals of reserves may be necessary.

Tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions

The Company discloses tax years that remain subject to examination by major tax jurisdictions pursuant to the ASC Paragraph 740-10-50-15.

Limitation on Utilization of NOLs due to Change in Control

Pursuant to the Internal Revenue Code Section 382 (“Section 382”), certain ownership changes may subject the NOL’s to annual limitations which could reduce or defer the NOL. Section 382 imposes limitations on a corporation’s ability to utilize NOLs if it experiences an “ownership change.” In general terms, an ownership change may result from transactions increasing the ownership of certain stockholders in the stock of a corporation by more than 50 percentage points over a three-year period. In the event of an ownership change, utilization of the NOLs would be subject to an annual limitation under Section 382 determined by multiplying the value of its stock at the time of the ownership change by the applicable long-term tax-exempt rate. Any unused annual limitation may be carried over to later years. The imposition of this limitation on its ability to use the NOLs to offset future taxable income could ~~cause the Company to pay U.S. federal income taxes earlier than if such limitation were not in effect and could cause such NOLs to expire unused, reducing or eliminating the benefit of such NOLs.~~

- 17 -

cause the Company to pay U.S. federal income taxes earlier than if such limitation were not in effect and could cause such NOLs to expire unused, reducing or eliminating the benefit of such NOLs.

Earnings per Share

Earnings per share ("EPS") is the amount of earnings attributable to each share of common stock. For convenience, the term is used to refer to either earnings or loss per share. EPS is computed pursuant to section 260-10-45 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification. Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-10 through 260-10-45-16 Basic EPS shall be computed by dividing income available to common stockholders (the numerator) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding (the denominator) during the period. Income available to common stockholders shall be computed by deducting both the dividends declared in the period on preferred stock (whether or not paid) and the dividends accumulated for the period on cumulative preferred stock (whether or not earned) from income from continuing operations (if that amount appears in the income statement) and also from net income. The computation of diluted EPS is similar to the computation of basic EPS except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional common shares that would have been outstanding if the dilutive potential common shares had been issued during the period to reflect the potential dilution that could occur from common shares issuable through contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants.

Pursuant to ASC Paragraphs 260-10-45-45-21 through 260-10-45-45-23 Diluted EPS shall be based on the most advantageous conversion rate or exercise price from the standpoint of the security holder. The dilutive effect of outstanding call options and warrants (and their equivalents) issued by the reporting entity shall be reflected in diluted EPS by application of the treasury stock method unless the provisions of paragraphs 260-10-45-35 through 45-36 and 260-10-55-8 through 55-11 require that another method be applied. Equivalents of options and warrants include non-vested stock granted to employees, stock purchase contracts, and partially paid stock subscriptions (see paragraph 260–10–55–23). Anti-dilutive contracts, such as purchased put options and purchased call options, shall be excluded from diluted EPS. Under the treasury stock method: a. Exercise of options and warrants shall be assumed at the beginning of the period (or at time of issuance, if later) and common shares shall be assumed to be issued. b. The proceeds from exercise shall be assumed to be used to purchase common stock at the average market price during the period. (See paragraphs 260-10-45-29 and 260-10-55-4 through 55-5.) c. The incremental shares (the difference between the number of shares assumed issued and the number of shares assumed purchased) shall be included in the denominator of the diluted EPS computation.

The Company’s contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants are as follows:

- 18 -


	Contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants

	For the Reporting Period Ended May 31, 2015		For the Reporting Period Ended May 31, 2014

Convertible Note - Related Party Shares

Potential outstanding dilutive related party common shares from the conversion of the principal amount of convertible notes payable convertible to common shares at $0.05 per share		560,000		710,000

Potential outstanding dilutive related party common shares from the conversion of the accrued interest of convertible notes payable convertible to common shares at $0.05 per share		80,682		59,132

Total contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants		640,682		769,132

	Contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants
	For the Reporting Period Ended February 28, 2015		For the Reporting Period Ended February 28, 2014
Convertible Note - Related Party Shares
Potential outstanding dilutive related party common shares from the conversion of the principal amount of convertible notes payable convertible to common shares at $0.05 per share		560,000		710,000
Potential outstanding dilutive related party common shares from the conversion of the accrued interest of convertible notes payable convertible to common shares at $0.05 per share		71,955		27,390
Total contingent shares issuance arrangement, stock options or warrants		631,955		737,390

There were approximately 103,894 and 128,200 incremental common shares under the Treasury Stock Method for the reporting period ended May 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, which were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation as they were anti-dilutive.

There were approximately 52,227 and 122,890 incremental common shares under the Treasury Stock Method for the reporting period ended February 28, 2015 and 2014, respectively, which were excluded from the diluted earnings per share calculation as they were anti-dilutive.

Cash Flows Reporting

The Company has adopted paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for cash flows reporting, classifies cash receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing, or financing activities and provides definitions of each category, and uses the indirect or reconciliation method (“Indirect method”) as defined by paragraph 230-10-45-24 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification to report net cash flow from operating activities by adjusting net income to reconcile it to net cash flow from operating activities by removing the effects of (a) all deferrals of past operating cash receipts and payments and all accruals of expected future operating cash receipts and payments and (b) all items that are included in net income that do not affect operating cash receipts and payments.

- 18 -

Subsequent events

The Company follows the guidance in Section 855-10-50 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for the disclosure of subsequent events. The Company will evaluate subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. Pursuant to ASU 2010-09 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, the Company as an SEC filer considers its financial statements issued when they are widely distributed to users, such as through filing them on EDGAR.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~June~~May 2014, the FASB issued ~~ASU~~the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-~~10,~~09 ~~Development~~“Revenue ~~Stage~~from ~~Entities~~Contracts with Customers (Topic ~~915~~606):” ~~Elimination~~(“ASU ~~of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation~~2014-09”).

~~The~~This ~~amendments~~guidance inamends ~~this Update remove~~ the ~~definition~~existing ofFASB ~~a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the~~ Accounting Standards Codification, ~~thereby~~creating ~~removing~~a ~~the~~new ~~financial~~Topic ~~reporting~~606, Revenue ~~distinction~~from ~~between~~Contracts ~~development~~with ~~stage entities and other reporting entities from U~~Customer.S. ~~GAAP.~~The Incore ~~addition,~~principle ~~the~~of ~~amendments eliminate~~ the ~~requirements~~guidance ~~for~~is ~~development~~that ~~stage~~an ~~entities~~entity toshould ~~(1)~~recognize ~~present~~revenue ~~inception-~~to~~-date~~ ~~information~~depict in the ~~statements~~transfer of ~~income,~~promised ~~cash~~goods ~~flows,~~or ~~and~~services ~~shareholder~~to ~~equity,~~customers ~~(2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities~~ in ~~which~~an ~~the~~amount ~~entity~~that isreflects ~~engaged, and (4) disclose in~~ the ~~first~~consideration ~~year~~to in which the entity isexpects noto ~~longer~~be aentitled ~~development stage entity that~~ in ~~prior~~exchange ~~years~~for itthose ~~had~~goods ~~been~~or ~~in the development stage~~services.

~~The~~To ~~amendments~~achieve ~~also clarify~~ that ~~the~~core ~~guidance in Topic 275~~principle, ~~Risks~~an ~~and~~entity ~~Uncertainties,~~should isapply ~~applicable~~the tofollowing ~~entities that have not commenced planned principal operations.~~steps:

Finally, the amendments remove paragraph 810-10-15-16. Paragraph 810-10-15-16 states that a development stage entity does not meet the condition in paragraph 810-10-15-14(a) to be a variable interest entity if (1) the entity can demonstrate that the equity invested in the legal entity is sufficient to permit it to finance the activities that it is currently engaged in and (2) the entity’s governing documents and contractual arrangements allow additional equity investments.

-Identify 19the -contract(s) with the customer

The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk2. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entity in the development stage.

~~The~~Identify ~~amendments related to~~ the ~~elimination~~performance ofobligations ~~inception-to-date~~in ~~information and~~ the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public business entities, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein.contract

Early application of each of the amendments is permitted for any annual reporting period or interim period for which the entity’s financial statements have not yet been issued (public business entities) or made available for issuance (other entities)3. ~~Upon adoption, entities will no longer present or disclose any information required by Topic 915.~~

Determine the transaction price

Allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract

Recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligations

The ASU also provides guidance on disclosures that should be provided to enable financial statement users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue recognition and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. Qualitative and quantitative information is required about the following:

Contracts with customers – including revenue and impairments recognized, disaggregation of revenue, and information about contract balances and performance obligations (including the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations)

Significant judgments and changes in judgments – determining the timing of satisfaction of performance obligations (over time or at a point in time), and determining the transaction price and amounts allocated to performance obligations

Assets recognized from the costs to obtain or fulfill a contract.

ASU 2014-09 is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period for all public entities. Early application is not permitted.

In August 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15 “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”).

In connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, an entity’s management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Management’s evaluation should be based on relevant conditions and events that are known and reasonably knowable at the date that the financial statements are issued (or at the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). Substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern exists when relevant conditions and events, considered in the aggregate, indicate that it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations as they become due within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The term probable is used consistently with its use in Topic 450, Contingencies.

When management identifies conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, management should consider whether its plans that are intended to mitigate those relevant conditions or events will alleviate the substantial doubt. The mitigating effect of management’s plans should be considered only to the extent that (1) it is probable that the plans will be effectively implemented and, if so, (2) it is probable that the plans will mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

- 19 -

If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, but the substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following (or refer to similar information disclosed elsewhere in the footnotes):

Principal conditions or events that raised substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern (before consideration of management’s plans)

Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations

Management’s plans that alleviated substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

If conditions or events raise substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern, and substantial doubt is not alleviated after consideration of management’s plans, an entity should include a statement in the footnotes indicating that there is substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). Additionally, the entity should disclose information that enables users of the financial statements to understand all of the following:

Principal conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern

Management’s evaluation of the significance of those conditions or events in relation to the entity’s ability to meet its obligations

Management’s plans that are intended to mitigate the conditions or events that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.

- 20 -

Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, when adopted, will have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

In November 2014, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-16 “Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815):

Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity” (“ASU 2014-16”).

The amendments in ASU No. 2014-16 clarify that an entity must take into account all relevant terms and features when reviewing the nature of the host contract. Additionally, the amendments state that no one term or feature would define the host contract’s economic characteristics and risks. Instead, the economic characteristics and risks of the hybrid financial instrument as a whole would determine the nature of the host contract.

The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption, including adoption in an interim period, is permitted.

In January 2015, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-01 “Income Statement—Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20): Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items” (“ASU 2015-01”).

This Update eliminates from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items and the requirements in Subtopic 225-20 for reporting entities to separately classify, present, and disclose extraordinary events and transactions.

The amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption.

In February 2015, the FASB issued the FASB Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-02 “Consolidation (Topic 810) - Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis” (“ASU 2015-02”) to improve certain areas of consolidation guidance for reporting organizations (i.e., public, private, and not-for-profit) that are required to evaluate whether to consolidate certain legal entities such as limited partnerships, limited liability corporations, and securitization structures (e.g., collateralized debt/loan obligations).

All legal entities are subject to reevaluation under the revised consolidation model. Specifically, the amendments:

Eliminating the presumption that a general partner should consolidate a limited partnership.

Eliminating the indefinite deferral of FASB Statement No. 167, thereby reducing the number of Variable Interest Entity (VIE) consolidation models from four to two (including the limited partnership consolidation model).

- 20 -

Clarifying when fees paid to a decision maker should be a factor to include in the consolidation of VIEs. Note: a VIE is a legal entity in which consolidation is not based on a majority of voting rights.

Amending the guidance for assessing how related party relationships affect VIE consolidation analysis.

Excluding certain money market funds from the consolidation guidance.

The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years, and for interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period.

Management does not believe that any recently issued, but not yet effective accounting pronouncements, when adopted, will have a material effect on the accompanying financial statements.

Note 3 – Going Concern

The Company has elected to adopt early application of Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, “Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”).

The Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that it will continue as a going concern, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets, and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

As reflected in the consolidated financial statements, the Company had an accumulated deficit ~~at February 28, 2015, a net loss~~ and ~~net~~negative ~~cash~~working ~~used~~capital inat ~~operating~~May ~~activities~~31, ~~for the reporting period then ended~~2015. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company is attempting to commence operations and generate revenue; however, its cash position may not be significant to support its daily operations. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to commence operations, generate revenues and in its ability to raise additional funds, there can be no assurances to that effect. The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to further implement its business plan and generate revenue and in its ability to raise additional funds.

- 21 -

The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments related to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 4 – Marketable Equity Securities, Available for Sale

On February 23, 2013, Transatlantic Mining Corp. (formerly Archean Star Resources Inc.) (“TMC”), a Toronto Stock Exchange listed company (Stock Symbol: TCO.V), issued the Company 500,000 shares of TMC common stock pursuant to the Option and Joint Venture Agreement. The Company did not value these marketable securities as there was no trading volume in them in the market.

On March 12, 2014, TMC issued the Company an additional 500,000 shares of TMC common stock pursuant to the Option and Joint Venture Agreement. The Company did not value these marketable securities as there was no trading volume in them in the market.

On December 16, 2013, Bayhorse Silver Inc. issued 500,000 shares of BSI common stock (Stock Symbol: BSI.V) to the Company, which was valued at CAD50,000 based on CAD0.10 per share on the date of receipt (CAD1 approximates $1) and recorded it as a return of investment in mineral rights.

On March 18, 2015, TMC issued the Company 500,000 shares of TMC common stock pursuant to the Option and Joint Venture Agreement. The Company did not value these marketable securities as there was no trading volume in them in the market.

On April 7, 2015, TMC issued the Company an additional 750,000 shares of TMC common stock pursuant to the amended Option and Joint Venture Agreement. The Company did not value these marketable securities as there was no trading volume in them in the market.

The table below provides a summary of the changes in the fair value of marketable securities, available for sale measured at fair value on a recurring basis using Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy to measure the fair value.

			Fair Value Measurement Using Level 1 Inputs
	Original cost		Impairment – Other Than Temporary				Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) - Foreign Currency Translation Gain (Loss)				Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) - Change in Unrealized Gain (Loss)			Fair Value
Balance, November 30, 2013	$	-		$	(-	)		$	-		$	(-	)		$	-
Purchases, issuances and settlements		50,000														50,000
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized) included in:
Net Loss: Impairment – other than temporary					-											-
Other comprehensive income (loss): Foreign currency translation gain (loss)									(10,000	)		-				(10,000	)
Other comprehensive income (loss): Changes in unrealized gain (loss)									-			(4,946	)			(4,946	)
Balance, November 30, 2014		50,000			(-	)			(10,000	)		(4,946	)			35,054
Purchases, issuances and settlements		-														-
Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized) included in:
Net Loss: Impairment – other than temporary
Other comprehensive income (loss): Foreign currency translation gain (loss)									5,000							5,000
Other comprehensive income (loss): Changes in unrealized gain (loss)												(4,040	)			(4,040	)
Balance, February 28, 2015	$	50,000		$	(-	)		$	(5,000	)	$	(8,986	)		$	36,014

- 21 -

- 22 -


			Fair Value Measurement Using Level 1 Inputs
	Original cost		Impairment – Other Than Temporary				Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) - Foreign Currency Translation Gain (Loss)				Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) - Change in Unrealized Gain (Loss)			Fair Value

Balance, November 30, 2013	$	-		$	(-	)		$	-		$	(-	)		$	-

Purchases, issuances and settlements		50,000														50,000

Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized) included in:

Net Loss: Impairment – other than temporary					-											-

Other comprehensive income (loss): Foreign currency translation gain (loss)									(10,000	)		-				(10,000	)

Other comprehensive income (loss): Changes in unrealized gain (loss)									-			(4,946	)			(4,946	)

Balance, November 30, 2014		50,000			(-	)			(10,000	)		(4,946	)			35,054

Purchases, issuances and settlements		-														-

Total gains or losses (realized/unrealized) included in:

Net Loss: Impairment – other than temporary

Other comprehensive income (loss): Foreign currency translation gain (loss)									-							-

Other comprehensive income (loss): Changes in unrealized gain (loss)												(2,934	)			(2,934	)

Balance, May 31, 2015	$	50,000		$	(-	)		$	(10,000	)	$	(7,880	)		$	32,120

Note 5 – Mineral Rights Acquisition

Pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement consummated on December 28, 2012, the Company acquired certain mineral properties and interests made up of the following nine projects which will be owned outright or controlled by the Company pursuant to mineral lease agreements or options to acquire leases: 1) an agreement to explore and acquire the Bayhorse silver mine consisting of 3 patented and 21 unpatented claims located in Baker County, Oregon; 2) a lease agreement pertaining to 37 unpatented mining claims located on Quartz Creek, in Mineral County, Montana; 3) a lease agreement pertaining to 58 unpatented mining claims located Trout Creek, in Mineral County, Montana; 4) a lease agreement pertaining to 18 unpatented mining claims referred to as the Vienna prospect locate in Shoshone County, Idaho; 5) a lease agreement pertaining to the Monitor-Richmond and Copper Age mines consisting of a total of 105 unpatented mining claims (20 original claims and Transatlantic Mining Corp. [formerly Archean Star], the Company’s joint venture partner for this lease, has paid for an additional 85 claims that are in the area of influence covered by the agreements) located in Shoshone County, Idaho; 6) ten leases granted by the State of Washington covering 4,664 acres of state mineral leases and 27 unpatented mining claims known as the Torada Creek Project in the Bodie Mining District in Okanogan County, Washington, seven of which were assigned to Kinross Gold USA, Inc. (“Kinross”) pursuant to an agreement between the Company and Kinross and three of which have been retained by the company and are currently in good standing; and 7) acquisition agreements pertaining to 15 unpatented mining claims located in Stevens County, Washington referred to as the Box Group; 8) acquisition agreements pertaining to 15 unpatented mining claims located in Stevens County, Washington referred to as the McKinley-McNally Property; and 9) directly owned all right, title, and claim to 26 unpatented claims commonly known as the North Moccasin Project or Plum Claims located in Fergus County, Montana.

- 22 -

In consideration for the acquisition of all of the mining assets of NAI, AMCOR (i) exchanged debt owed by NAI in the amount of $382,500 and accrued interest in the amount of $30,564 through November 30, 2012, and (ii) issued 71,500,000 shares of AMCOR restricted common stock, valued at par value $0.001 or $71,500, to NAI, which was subsequently transferred to NAI shareholders, or total consideration of $484,564 in aggregate.

On April 9, 2013 the Company paid $10,000 to acquire additional rights from Hydro Imaging, Inc.

The key terms and conditions of the five mineral property leases are as follows:

Bayhorse Mine:

The date of the Company’s mining lease with Bayhorse Silver Mine LLC is June 26, 2012. The term of the lease on the three patented and 21 unpatented claims that make up the property is for 25 years, with an option to renew the lease for two additional successive terms of fifteen (15) years each, so long as there are ores or minerals being developed, mined, processed or marketed on a continuing basis or when exploration activities have advanced far enough that the construction activities related to the start-up of ore production are expected to commence within one year. The initial consideration for the lease was a cash payment of ten thousand ($10,000) dollars. Annual minimum advanced royalties will be due the Lessor on the following basis. The Company is required to pay an annual advance minimum royalty of $10,000 on the first anniversary of this lease, $20,000 on the second anniversary, $30,000 on the third anniversary, $40,000 on the fourth anniversary, $50,000 on the fifth anniversary, and $50,000 on each anniversary thereafter.

Option and Joint Venture Agreement with Bayhorse Silver Inc.

On December 4, 2013, AMCOR signed an Option and Joint Venture Agreement (the "BSI Option and Joint Venture Agreement") with Bayhorse Silver Inc. (formerly Kent Exploration, Inc.) (“BSI”), a Canadian mineral exploration company, whereby BSI can acquire an Option (the "Option") to earn an 80% interest in the Bayhorse Silver Mine ("Bayhorse") in east-central Oregon State. The terms of the Agreement called for a payment of $20,000 from BSI to the Company upon execution of the Agreement. To earn the 80% interest BSI is required to conduct a minimum of $100,000 per year on exploration expenditures on the property on, or before, each of the first two anniversaries of the Agreement, $300,000 on or before the third anniversary of the Agreement and expend $500,000 on or before the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the Agreement. As part of the transaction, AMCOR received 500,000 shares of BSI common stock upon signing of the agreement and will receive an additional 500,000 shares of BSI common stock on the third and fifth anniversaries of the agreement, subject to BSI going forward with the agreement after year one. Giving the current economic condition the Company has deferred exploration expenditures requirement for the time being.

Pursuant to BSI Option and Joint Venture Agreement BSI assumes all of the obligations of the underlying lease agreement with Northern Adventures, Inc.

In July 2013, the first anniversary royalty payment was deferred until December 31, 2013, or payable within ten business days after AMCOR secures funding in excess of $500,000. It was subsequently deferred to December 31, 2015. In July 2014, the second anniversary royalty payment was deferred until December 31, 2014, then it was further deferred on December 30, 2014 until December 31, 2015, or payable within ten business days after AMCOR secures funding in excess of $500,000. There are also work requirements for each year and the lease calls for a variable net smelter royalty in the future. The first and second year work requirements have been fulfilled.

- 23 -

requirements for each year and the lease calls for a variable net smelter royalty in the future. The first and second year work requirements have been fulfilled.

In November, 2013 and December, 2013 BSI paid the Company $5,000 in deposit, $20,000 in advance minimum royalty payments, respectively or $25,000 in aggregate, which was recorded as return of investment in mineral rights.

On December 16, 2013, Bayhorse Silver Inc. issued 500,000 shares of BSI common stock (Stock Symbol: BHS.V) to the Company, which was valued at CAD50,000 based on CAD0.10 per share on the date of issuance (CAD1 approximates $1.00 on the date of issuance), $24,000 of which were recorded as return of investment in mineral rights and $26,000 of which were recorded are royalty revenue.

On February 12, 2014, Bayhorse Silver Inc. issued 125,000 shares of its subsidiary, Silcom Systems Inc.’s (Silcom), restricted common stock to the Company for no consideration. The issuance was dividend shares from BSI’s subsidiary, Silcom, given to shareholders of Bayhorse Silver Inc. There is no market for the shares currently and the Company valued these share as $0.

Six additional mining claims were filed by BSI in Mineral Country, Idaho, and come under the area of influence provision of the BSI Option and Joint Venture Agreement. BSI paid the costs to locate and will maintain these claims. The unpatented Bayhorse claims have been reduced from 21 to 18.

- 23 -

Vienna Mine:

The date of the Company’s mining lease with Martin Clemets is June 26, 2012. The term of the lease on 18 unpatented claims that make up the property is for 25 years, with an option to renew the lease for two additional successive terms of fifteen (15) years each, so long as there are ores or minerals being developed, minded, processed or marketed on a continuing basis or when exploration activities have advanced far enough that the construction activities related to the start-up of ore production are expected to commence within one year. The initial consideration for the lease was a cash payment of five thousand ($5,000) dollars. Annual minimum advanced royalties will be due the Lessor on the following basis. The Company is required to pay an annual advance minimum royalty of $10,000 on the first anniversary of this lease, $20,000 on the second anniversary, $30,000 on the third anniversary, $40,000 on the fourth anniversary, $50,000 on the fifth anniversary, and $50,000 on each anniversary thereafter.

In July 2013, the first anniversary royalty payment was deferred until December 31, 2013, or payable within ten business days after AMCOR secures funding in excess of $500,000. It was subsequently extended to December 31, 2015. In July 2013, the second anniversary royalty payment was deferred until December 31, 2014, then further to December 31, 2015, or payable within ten business days after AMCOR secures funding in excess of $500,000. There are also work requirements for each year and the lease calls for a variable net smelter royalty in the future. The first and second year work requirement have been deferred, and allowed to be accomplished at the earliest possible time, weather permitting.

Monitor-Richmond-Copper Age Mines:

On June 27, 2012, Northern Adventures, Inc. originally entered into the Mining Lease with Northern Adventures, Inc., and AMCOR assumed the rights in that Mining Lease from Northern Adventures, Inc. pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement dated December 28, 2012. The term of the lease on 20 unpatented claims that make up the property is for 25 years, with an option to renew the lease for two additional successive terms of fifteen (15) years each, so long as there are ores or minerals being developed, mined, processed or marketed on a continuing basis or when exploration activities have advanced far enough that the construction activities related to the start-up of ore production are expected to commence within one year. The initial consideration for the lease was a cash payment of five thousand ($5,000) dollars. Annual minimum advanced royalties will be due the Lessor on the following basis. The Company is required to pay an annual advance minimum royalty of $10,000 on the first anniversary of this lease, $20,000 on the second anniversary, $30,000 on the third anniversary, $40,000 on the fourth anniversary, $50,000 on the fifth anniversary, and $50,000 on each anniversary thereafter. There are also work requirements for each year and the lease calls for a variable net smelter royalty in the future. The first and second year work requirements have been fulfilled.

Option and Joint Venture Agreement with Transatlantic Mining Corp. (formerly Archean Star Resources, Inc.)

On February 5, 2013, the Company entered into a definitive Option and Joint Venture Agreement with Transatlantic Mining Corp. (formerly Archean Star Resources, Inc.) (“TMC”) (“TMC Option and Joint Venture Agreement”) pertaining to 20 unpatented claims leased by AMCOR pursuant to a Mining Lease with Northern Adventures, Inc. As part of the transaction, AMCOR received 500,000 shares of TMC common stock upon signing of the agreement and an additional 500,000 shares of TMC common stock on the second and third anniversaries of the agreement, subject to TMC going forward with the agreement after year one. TMC paid an up-front fee of $7,500 to AMCOR and assume the obligations of the underlying lease agreement. Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the TMC Option and Joint Venture Agreement TMC can earn up to 80% ownership interest in the property lease by expending $2,100,000 over a three year period, with a minimum expenditure of $700,000 in year one of the agreement. AMCOR’s interest shall be a Carried Interest until such time as a Bankable Feasibility Study has been produced or a decision to mine has been made.

- 24 -

Pursuant to TMC Option and Joint Venture Agreement TMC assumes all of the obligations of the underlying lease agreement with Northern Adventures, Inc.

First Amendment to the TMC Options and Joint Venture Agreement

On July 22, 2014, the Parties entered into a “Memorandum of Understanding” relating to the Deficiency under Section 3.6 of TMC Options and Joint Venture Agreement in the amount of Expenditure incurred by TMC in year 1 under Section 3.3 (e), in the amount of $106,726. The Parties to the above Agreement agreed that the Deficiency in year 1 of $106,726 will be carried forward to year 2 to make the total Expenditure for that year of $806,726. This is agreed that the Option remains in good standing, and also that this dealing with the Deficiency, as above, will be sufficient so as to regard TMC as not being in default under the Agreement.

Second Amendment to the TMC Options and Joint Venture Agreement

For an additional consideration of 1.5 million (One-Million Five-Hundred Thousand) common shares in the capital stock of Transatlantic Mining Company and the total payment of $25,000 (twenty-five thousand) to NALLC/AMCOR, the parties ~~agree~~agreed to the following amendment: 1) the TMC’s short-fall of the minimum year one $700,000 work requirement of $215,000 was waived, 2) TMC is obligated to expend a minimum of $700,000 on the property between February 5, 2015 and February 5, 2016, and 3) TMC is obligated to expend a minimum of $700,000 on the property between February 5, 2016 and February 5, 2017.

- 24 -

TMC is obligated to expend a minimum of $700,000 on the property between February 5, 2015 and February 5, 2016, and 3) TMC is obligated to expend a minimum of $700,000 on the property between February 5, 2016 and February 5, 2017.

Pursuant to the Second Amendment TCO shall tender additional consideration within 20 days from the date of signing of this agreement to accounts and parties as directed by NALLC and AMCOR. TCO shall also present an updated accounting of all expenditures incurred on the Monitor and Big Elk/Brushy Creek properties within 30 days.

~~On February 8~~TMC, ~~2013~~has ~~TMC~~filed ~~paid~~an ~~the~~additional ~~Company~~85 anMonitor ~~up-front~~claims ~~fee~~and ofNorthern $7Adventures,~~500,~~ ~~which was recorded as a return of investment in mineral rights~~Inc. ~~On February 23~~, ~~2013,~~is ~~TMC issued~~ the ~~Company~~claimant ~~500,000~~on ~~shares of TMC common stock (Stock Symbol: TCO~~those.~~V).~~ AMCOR ~~The~~has ~~Company~~interest ~~did~~in ~~not~~those ~~value~~claims ~~these~~through ~~marketable~~its ~~securities~~Mining asLease ~~there~~with ~~was~~Northern noAdventures, ~~trading volume in them in the market~~Inc.

OnAccounting ~~March~~Treatment ~~18,~~for ~~2014,~~Considerations TMC issued the Company an additional 500,000 shares of TMC common stock pursuant to the Option and Joint Venture Agreement. The Company did not value these marketable securities as there was no trading volume in them in the market.Received

~~TMC~~On ~~was~~February to8, ~~issue~~2013 TMC paid the Company an ~~additional~~up-front ~~750,000~~fee ~~shares~~ of ~~TMC~~$7,500, ~~common~~which ~~stock~~was ~~and~~recorded ~~pay~~as ~~$12,500~~a ~~within~~return 20of ~~days,~~investment ~~pursuant~~in tomineral ~~the~~rights. On ~~amended~~February ~~option~~23, to2013, ~~joint~~TMC ~~venture~~issued ~~agreement~~500,000 onshares ~~March~~of ~~12,~~its ~~2015. The~~common ~~Company~~stock ~~received~~(Stock aSymbol: ~~$12,485~~TCO.V) ~~wire~~to ~~payment~~the onCompany. ~~April~~The 7,Company ~~2015,~~did tonot ~~fulfill~~value ~~the~~these ~~required~~marketable ~~payment~~securities ~~and~~as there was ~~issued~~no ~~750,000~~trading ~~shares~~volume ofin ~~TMC~~them onin ~~April~~the ~~21, 2015~~market..

On March 18, 2014, TMC issued an additional 500,000 shares of its common stock to the Company pursuant to the Option and Joint Venture Agreement. The Company did not value these marketable securities as there was no trading volume in them in the market.

On April 7, 2015 TMC paid the Company $12,500, which was recorded as a return of investment in mineral rights. On April 21, 2015, TMC issued 750,000 shares of its common stock to the Company pursuant to the Second Amendment to the Option and Joint Venture Agreement. The Company did not value these marketable securities as there was no trading volume in them in the market.

Quartz Creek:

The date of the Company’s mining lease with Northern Adventures, Inc. is June 26, 2012. The term of the lease on 37 unpatented claims that make up the property is for 25 years, with an option to renew the lease for two additional successive terms of fifteen (15) years each, so long as there are ores or minerals being developed, mined, processed or marketed on a continuing basis or when exploration activities have advanced far enough that the construction activities related to the start-up of ore production are expected to commence within one year. The initial consideration for the lease was a cash payment of twenty five thousand ($25,000) dollars. Annual minimum advanced royalties will be due the Lessor on the following basis. The Company is required to pay an annual advance minimum royalty of $10,000 on the first anniversary of this lease, $20,000 on the second anniversary, $30,000 on the third anniversary, $40,000 on the fourth anniversary, $50,000 on the fifth anniversary, and $50,000 on each anniversary thereafter.

In July 2013, the first anniversary royalty payment was deferred until December 31, 2013, or payable within ten business days after AMCOR secures funding in excess of $500,000. It was subsequently extended to December 31, 2015. In July 2014, the second anniversary royalty payment was deferred until December 31, 2014, and further until December 31, 2015, or payable within ten business days after AMCOR secures funding in excess of $500,000. There are also work requirements for each year and the lease calls for a variable net smelter royalty in the future. The first and second year work requirement has been deferred, allowed to be accomplished at the earliest possible time, weather permitting.

Trout Creek:

The date of the Company’s mining lease with Northern Adventures LLC is June 26, 2012. The term of the lease on 58 unpatented claims that make up the property is for 25 years, with an option to renew the lease for two additional successive terms of fifteen (15) years each, so long as there are ores or minerals being developed, mined, processed or marketed on a continuing basis or when exploration activities have advanced far enough that the construction activities related to the start-up of ore production are expected to commence within one year. The initial consideration for the lease was a cash payment of twenty five thousand ($25,000) dollars. Annual minimum advanced royalties will be due the Lessor on the following basis. The Company is required to pay an annual advance minimum royalty of $10,000 on the first anniversary of this lease, $20,000 on the second anniversary, $30,000 on the third anniversary, $40,000 on the fourth anniversary, $50,000 on the fifth anniversary, and $50,000 on each anniversary thereafter.

- 25 -

advance minimum royalty of $10,000 on the first anniversary of this lease, $20,000 on the second anniversary, $30,000 on the third anniversary, $40,000 on the fourth anniversary, $50,000 on the fifth anniversary, and $50,000 on each anniversary thereafter.

In July 2013, the first anniversary royalty payment was deferred until December 31, 2013, or payable within ten business days after AMCOR secures funding in excess of $500,000. It was subsequently extended to December 31, 2015. In July 2013, the second anniversary royalty payment was deferred until December 31, 2014, and further until December 31, 2015, or payable within ten business days after AMCOR secures funding in excess of $500,000. There are also work requirements for each year and the lease calls for a variable net smelter royalty in the future. The first and second year work requirements have been deferred, allowed to be accomplished at the earliest possible time, weather permitting.

These claims have been reduced to 35.

- 25 -

Royalty Obligations and Work Requirement with Mining Leases of Bayhorse, Vienna, Quartz Creek, and Trout Creek:

The four leases including the Bayhorse, Vienna, Quartz Creek, and Trout Creek required first anniversary payments by the Company of $10,000 each and second anniversary payment by the Company of $20,000 each, but no payments have been made except for the Bayhorse payment that was assumed by BSI. The first anniversary royalty payment was deferred until December 31, 2015 or payable within ten business days after the Company secures funding in excess of $500,000. The second anniversary royalty payment due on the Vienna, Quartz Creek, and Trout Creek was deferred until December 31, 2015 or payable within ten business days after the Company secures funding in excess of $500,000. The second anniversary payment for the Bayhorse property was assumed by and paid by BSI.

The first and second year work requirement for the Vienna, Quartz Creek, and Trout Creek leases have also been deferred, allowed to be accomplished at the earliest possible time, weather permitting. The first and second year work requirement for the Bayhorse lease has been fulfilled.

Washington State Mineral Prospecting Leases—Bodie Project Toroda Creek-Wauconda Mining District

The terms and conditions for annual prospecting leases granted from the State of Washington require the expenditure of $3.00 per acre on prospecting or exploration on an annual basis during the term of the lease. The work conducted must be performed in such a manner as to contribute directly to the evaluation of the economic mineral potential of the leased property. As an alternative there is the option to make cash payments to the State in the amount of $3.00 per acre in lieu of the performance of prospecting work for up to, but not more than three (3) years during the term of the prospecting lease. In addition to the requirement to expend $3.00 per acre on prospecting and exploration on an annual basis, there is a requirement to pay the State of Washington an annual rental fee of $2.00 per acre for the first three years of the mineral prospecting lease and $3.00 per year for each subsequent year.

Agreement with Kinross Gold USA, Inc.

On April 5, 2013 AMCOR exercised an option to acquire three mineral leases located in Okanogan County, Washington, pursuant to an Option to Purchase Mineral Leases between Hydro Imaging, Inc. (“Hydro”) and Northern Adventures, Inc. (“NAI”) entered into on June 25, 2012 and amended on December 7, 2012, which option was transferred to the Company on December 28, 2012 by NAI pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement. The Company also acquired Hydro Imaging’s rights in a Mineral Lease and Assignment agreement with Kinross Gold USA, Inc. (“Kinross Mineral Lease and Assignment Agreement”). The original option was granted by Hydro, a private company owned solely by David Boleneus, currently a member of the Company’s board of directors, to NAI on June 25, 2012. Under the terms and conditions of the original option Hydro was granted the right to acquire ten leases granted by the Department of Natural Resources for the State of Washington totaling 4,583.76 acres and 27 unpatented mining claims located in the Toroda Creek-Wauconda Mining district in Okanogan country in the State of Washington for the payment of an exercise price of $10,000.

On February 28, 2013, Hydro concluded the Mining Lease and Assignment agreement with Kinross Gold USA, Inc. (“Kinross”) concerning seven of the ten mineral leases totaling 2,934.56 acres and a lease on 27 unpatented mining claims located in Okanogan County, Washington. The seven state leases were transferred from Hydro to Kinross and approved by the State of Washington on March 27, 2013.

Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Mining Lease and Assignment agreement Kinross will pay AMCOR production royalties as follows: a 1% net smelter return royalty on all minerals extracted from the area covered by the 7 leases and a 2.5% net smelter return royalty on all minerals extracted from the area covered by the 27 unpatented mining claims. Kinross will also pay advance royalty payments in the aggregate amount of $1 million as follows: $15,000 payable within 7 days of February 28, 2013, the effective date, $15,000 payable within 15 days of the effective date, $40,000 payable on February 28, 2014, $50,000 payable on February 28, 2015, and thereafter the annual advance royalty payment is to increase by 5% per year up to a maximum annual payment of $100,000. The obligation to pay the advance royalty payment shall cease once an aggregate of $1 million has been paid. Advance minimum royalty payments shall be credited against the production royalties. The production royalty payments for minerals produced from the state leases shall be capped at $3,000,000 for each of the seven leases, including any advanced royalty payments to be offset.

- 26 -

royalty payments shall be credited against the production royalties. The production royalty payments for minerals produced from the state leases shall be capped at $3,000,000 for each of the seven leases, including any advanced royalty payments to be offset.

Pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Kinross Mineral Lease and Assignment Agreement, Kinross will assume all of the underlying obligations, annual rental expenses, and work requirements related to the seven leases and 27 unpatented mining claims to maintain the seven state mining leases and the unpatented claims in effect and good standing. The remaining three state mining leases totaling 1,649.20 acres were transferred from Hydro to AMCOR and the transfer was approved from the Department of Natural Resources for the State of Washington.

On April 5, 2013 Kinross Gold USA, Inc. ~~paid~~made the ~~Company the~~ $30,000 year one annual advance minimum royalty payment which was recorded as return of investment in mineral rights.

On- ~~March 3, 2014 Kinross Gold USA, Inc. paid the Company the $40,000 year two annual advance minimum royalty payment, $~~26~~,000~~ ~~of which were recorded as return of investment in mineral rights and $14,000 of which was recorded as royalty revenue.~~-

On March 3, 2014 Kinross Gold USA, Inc. made the $40,000 year two annual advance minimum royalty payment, $26,000 of which were recorded as return of investment in mineral rights and $14,000 of which was recorded as royalty revenue.

On March 2, 2015 Kinross Gold USA, Inc. made the $50,000 year three annual advance minimum royalty payment, all of which was recorded as royalty revenue.

AMCOR paid the State of Washington the minimum prospecting payments and an annual rental fee for the three remaining leases totaling 1,649.20 acres when due and include such payments in cost of revenue - licenses and permits in the statements of operations.

Impairment Testing of Mineral Rights and DD&A Expenses

(i)

Impairment Testing

The Company completed its annual impairment testing of mining rights and determined that there was an impairment of $348,564 at November 30, 2014.

(ii)

Depreciation, Depletion and Amortization Expenses

No depreciation, depletion and amortization was recorded for the reporting period ended November 30, 2014 or 2013 as the Company has not yet commenced operations.

Note 6 – Related Party Transactions

Related Parties

Related parties with whom the Company had transactions are:

Related Parties	Relationship	~~Relationship~~Related Party Transactions	Business Purpose of transactions
Frank H. Blair		President, CEO and director
Management and significant stockholder
Dwight Weigelt		CFO, Treasurer, Secretary, Director
Frank H. Blair	President, CEO and director	None	N/A
Gerry Frankovich		V.P. and director
Dwight Weigelt	CFO, Treasurer, Secretary, Director	None	N/A
David Boleneus		Director
Gerry Frankovich	V.P. and director	None	N/A
Louis G. Cornacchia		Director
David Boleneus	Director	(i) Note payable	(i) Working capital
Manuel Graiwer		Director
Louis G. Cornacchia	Director	None	N/A
Floyd Short		A significant stockholder (owning 5% or more of common shares)
Manuel Graiwer	Director	(i) Note payable	(i) Working capital
Jerod Edington		A significant stockholder (owning 5% or more of common shares)
Floyd Short	A significant stockholder (owning 5% or more of common shares)	None	N/A
IWJ Consulting Group, LLC		An entity controlled by a significant stockholder
Jerod Edington	A significant stockholder (owning 5% or more of common shares)	None	N/A
Jay Edington	The father of a significant stockholder	~~The father of a significant stockholder~~None	N/A
Sherry Edington	The mother of a significant stockholder	~~The mother of a significant stockholder~~None	N/A
Key Financial Services, Inc.		An entity controlled by the father of a significant stockholder
Entity controlled by significant stockholder
Triax Capital Management, Inc.		An entity controlled by the father of a significant stockholder
IWJ Consulting Group, LLC	An entity controlled by a significant stockholder	(i) Note payable, (ii) consulting services	(i) Working capital, (ii) consulting services.
Key Financial Services, Inc.	An entity controlled by the father of a significant stockholder	(i) Note payable, (ii) consulting services	(i) Working capital, (ii) consulting services.
Triax Capital Management, Inc.	An entity controlled by the father of a significant stockholder	(i) Note payable, (ii) consulting services	(i) Working capital, (ii) consulting services.

- 27 -

Convertible Notes Payable – Related Party

From time to time, certain officers and directors provided working capital to the Company in the form of convertible notes payable.

Convertible notes payable – related party consisted of the following:

	February 28, 2015		November 30, 2014
	May 31, 2015		November 30, 2014
On December 31, 2012, the Company issued a convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $10,000 with interest at 8% per annum, convertible to common stock at $0.05 per share, maturing on January 31, 2013, subsequently extended to December 31, 2015. $2,500 of this convertible note was repaid on February 12, 2013.	$	7,500		$	7,500
On March 8, 2013, the Company issued a convertible note in the principal amount of $5,000 with interest at 5% per annum, convertible to common stock at $0.05 per share, maturing on June 30, 2013, subsequently extended to December 31, 2015.		5,000			5,000
On March 21, 2013, the Company issued a convertible note in the principal amount of $3,000 with interest at 5% per annum, convertible to common stock at $0.05 per share, maturing on June 30, 2013, subsequently extended to December 31, 2015.		3,000			3,000
On June 28, 2013, the Company issued a convertible note to Manuel Graiwer, a director of the Company, in the principal amount of $20,000 with interest at 6% per annum, convertible to common stock at $0.05 per share, maturing on September 26, 2013, subsequently extended to December 31, 2015. On January 9, 2014 the Company repaid $7,500 toward this convertible note.		12,500			12,500
	$	28,000		$	28,000

Notes Payable – Related Party

From time to time, certain officers and directors provided working capital to the Company in the form of notes payable.

Notes payable – related party consisted of the following:

- 28 -

	February 28, 2015		November 30, 2014
On October 11, 2013, the Company issued a promissory note to a third party business entity in the principal amount of $1,000 with interest at 5% per annum maturing on October 11, 2014, subsequently extended to December 31, 2015. This note was repaid in full on March 3, 2015.	$	1,000		$	1,000
On October 15, 2013, the Company issued a promissory note to a third party individual in the principal amount of $1,500 with interest at 5% per annum maturing on October 15, 2014, subsequently extended to December 31, 2015. This note was repaid in full on March 3, 2015.		1,500			1,500
On December 5, 2013, the Company issued a promissory note to Manuel Graiwer, a director of the Company, in the principal amount of $20,000 with interest at 6% per annum maturing on January 14, 2014, which was subsequently extended to December 31, 2015.		20,000			20,000
On December 10, 2013, the Company issued a promissory note to a third party individual in the principal amount of $300 with interest at 5% per annum maturing on December 31, 2014, subsequently extended to December 31, 2015. This note was repaid in full on March 3, 2015.		300			300
On July 28, 2014, the Company issued a promissory note to a third party business entity in the principal amount of $3,500 with interest at 5% per annum maturing on December 31, 2014, subsequently extended to December 31, 2015. This note was repaid in full on March 3, 2015.		3,500			3,500
On September 4, 2014, the Company issued a promissory note to a third party business entity in the principal amount of $2,500 with interest at 5% per annum maturing on December 31, 2014, subsequently extended to December 31, 2015. This note was repaid in full on March 3, 2015.		2,500			2,500
On September 29, 2014, the Company issued a promissory note to a third party business entity in the principal amount of $15,000 with interest at 5% per annum maturing on December 31, 2014, subsequently extended to December 31, 2015. $4,000 and interest of $320.55 was paid back on March 4, 2015.		15,000			15,000
On October 27, 2014, the Company issued a promissory note to a third party business entity in the principal amount of $3,000 with interest at 5% per annum maturing on December 31, 2014, subsequently extended to December 31, 2015. This note was repaid in full on March 3, 2015.		3,000			3,000
On December 1, 2014, the Company issued a promissory note to David Boleneus, a director of the Company, in the principal amount of $5,000 with interest at 8% per annum maturing on March 1, 2015. This note was repaid in full on March 3, 2015.		5,000			-
	$	51,800		$	46,800

Notes payable – related party consisted of the following:


	May 31, 2015		November 30, 2014
On October 11, 2013, the Company issued a promissory note to a third party business entity in the principal amount of $1,000 with interest at 5% per annum maturing on October 11, 2014, subsequently extended to December 31, 2015. This note was repaid in full on March 3, 2015.	$	-	$	1,000

On October 15, 2013, the Company issued a promissory note to a third party individual in the principal amount of $1,500 with interest at 5% per annum maturing on October 15, 2014, subsequently extended to December 31, 2015. This note was repaid in full on March 3, 2015.		-		1,500

On December 5, 2013, the Company issued a promissory note to Manuel Graiwer, a director of the Company, in the principal amount of $20,000 with interest at 6% per annum maturing on January 14, 2014, which was subsequently extended to December 31, 2015.		20,000		20,000

On December 10, 2013, the Company issued a promissory note to a third party individual in the principal amount of $300 with interest at 5% per annum maturing on December 31, 2014, subsequently extended to December 31, 2015. This note was repaid in full on March 3, 2015.		-		300

On July 28, 2014, the Company issued a promissory note to a third party business entity in the principal amount of $3,500 with interest at 5% per annum maturing on December 31, 2014, subsequently extended to December 31, 2015. This note was repaid in full on March 3, 2015.		-		3,500

On September 4, 2014, the Company issued a promissory note to a third party business entity in the principal amount of $2,500 with interest at 5% per annum maturing on December 31, 2014, subsequently extended to December 31, 2015. This note was repaid in full on March 3, 2015.		-		2,500

On September 29, 2014, the Company issued a promissory note to a third party business entity in the principal amount of $15,000 with interest at 5% per annum maturing on December 31, 2014, subsequently extended to December 31, 2015. $4,000 and interest of $320.55 was paid back on March 4, 2015. $3,000 was paid back on April 13, 2015.		8,000		15,000

On October 27, 2014, the Company issued a promissory note to a third party business entity in the principal amount of $3,000 with interest at 5% per annum maturing on December 31, 2014, subsequently extended to December 31, 2015. This note was repaid in full on March 3, 2015.		-		3,000

On December 1, 2014, the Company issued a promissory note to David Boleneus, a director of the Company, in the principal amount of $5,000 with interest at 8% per annum maturing on March 1, 2015. This note was repaid in full on March 3, 2015.		-		-

On April 20, 2015, the Company issued a promissory note to a related party entity in the principal amount of $6,000 with interest at 0% per annum maturing on December 31, 2015.		6,000		-

	$	34,000	$	46,800

Notes Payable - Related Party

On March 3, 2015, notes payable – related party of $20,800 in principal and $793.41 in interest were repaid.

On April 13, 2015, notes payable – related party of $3,000 in principal was repaid.

Note 7 – Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

Shares Authorized

Shares Authorized upon Incorporation

Upon incorporation on March 30, 2004 the total authorized capital stock of the corporation was:

Seventy Million (70,000,000) shares of Class A Common Stock with a Par Value of $0.001 all of which shall be entitled to voting power.

- 29 -

Two million (2,000,000) authorized Series A Preferred Shares with a par value of $0.001 and such other terms as determined by the Board of Directors of the corporation prior to their issuance. Each Series A Preferred Share shall have voting rights and shall carry a voting weight equal to ten (10) Common Shares. Each Series A Preferred Share may be converted into ten (10) Common Shares upon approval by the Board of Directors of the corporation.

Two million (2,000,000) authorized Series B Preferred Shares with a par value of $0.001 per share and such other terms as may be determined prior to their issuance by the Board of Directors. Each Series B Preferred Share shall have voting rights and shall carry a voting weight equal to two (2) Common Shares. Each Series B Preferred Share may be converted into two (2) Common Shares upon approval by the Board of Directors.

One million (1,000,000) authorized Series C Preferred Shares with a par value of $0.001 per share and such other terms as may be determined by the Board of Directors prior to their issuance. No Series C Preferred Share shall have voting rights.

Shares Authorized per Articles of Merger

On December 27, 2004, APD Antiquities, Inc. ("APD") and GCJ, Inc. entered into to an Acquisition Agreement and Plan of Merger whereby GCJ, Inc. merged with and into APD with APD as the surviving entity. Pursuant to the Articles of Merger the total number of shares of all classes of stock which the Company is authorized to issue is Seventy-Five Million (75,000,000) shares of which Five Million (5,000,000) shares shall be Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share, and Seventy Million (70,000,000) shares shall be Common Stock, par value $0.001 per share.

Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation

On October 14, 2011, upon approval by written consent, in lieu of a special meeting, the Board of Directors of the Company approved the corporate name change, the increase in the number of authorized shares and the reverse split of the issued common stock pursuant to a Written Consent of Directors. Subsequently, on October 17, 2011, upon approval by written consent, in lieu of a special meeting, of the majority stockholders the Company is authorized to file a certificate of amendment to its Articles of Incorporation to (1) change the name of the Company from APD Antiquities, Inc. to American Cordillera Mining Corporation; (2) increase the number of authorized shares of par value $0.001 stock from Seventy Five Million (75,000,000) shares up to Two Hundred Ten Million (210,000,000) shares, composed of an increase in authorized shares of par value $0.001 common stock from Seventy Million (70,000,000) up to Two Hundred Million (200,000,000), and an increase the number of authorized shares of par value $0.001 preferred stock from Five Million (5,000,000) up to Ten Million (10,000,000) shares; and (3) undertake a 20-for-1 reverse split of its issued and outstanding common stock.

On December 12, 2012, the Company filed the Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of the State of the State of Nevada to effectuate the name change, effective on December 12, 2012.

On December 17, 2012, the Company filed the Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of the State of the State of Nevada to effectuate the increase of the number of authorized shares, effective on December 28, 2012.

The Company has not effectuated, and decided not to effectuate, a 20-for-1 reverse split of its issued and outstanding common stock as of the date when the financial statements were issued.

Common Stock

Sale of Common Stock or Equity Units

Immediately prior to the consummation of the Assets Purchase Agreement on December 28, 2012, the Company had 6,701,111 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

On December 28, 2012, as part of the consummation of the Asset Purchase Agreement all of the convertible note holders of the Company converted all of their then outstanding convertible notes payable in the principal amount of $486,000 and related accrued interest in the amount of $41,078 to the shares of common stock of the Company at $0.05 per share, or 9,720,000 and 821,568 shares.

Upon consummation of the Asset Purchase Agreement on December 28, 2012, the Company issued 71,500,000 shares of its common stock to Northern Adventures, Inc. pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement which involved, in part, the exchange of debt in the principal amount of $382,500 and accrued interest in the amount of $30,564, which was applies as partial consideration for the acquisition of mining assets.

- 30 -

On February 11, 2013, the Company entered into a definitive agreement relating to the private placement of $25,000 of its securities through the sale of 500,000 shares of its common stock at $0.05 per share to an investor.

- 30 -

On February 18, 2013, the Company entered into a definitive agreement relating to the private placement of $5,000 of its securities through the sale of 100,000 shares of its common stock at $0.05 per share to an investor.

On May 1, 2013, the Company entered into a definitive agreement relating to the private placement of $7,000 of its securities through the sale of 140,000 shares of its common stock at $0.05 per share to an investor.

On August 21, 2013, the Company entered into a definitive agreement relating to the private placement of $5,000 of its securities through the sale of 100,000 shares of its common stock at $0.05 per share to an investor.

On August 30, 2013, the Company entered into a definitive agreement relating to the private placement of $12,000 of its securities through the sale of 200,000 shares of its common stock at $0.06 per share to an investor.

On September 30, 2013, the Company entered into a definitive agreement relating to the private placement of $6,000 of its securities through the sale of 100,000 shares of its common stock at $0.06 per share to an investor.

Stock Option Plan

2001 Stock Option Plan as Amended

Adoption of 2001 Stock Option Plan

Before the Merger, on January 15, 2001, the Board of Directors of the Company adopted the 2001 Non-Qualified Stock Option and Stock Appreciation Rights Plan, whereby the Board of Directors authorized 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001, to be reserved for issuance (“2001 Stock Option Plan”). The purpose of the 2001 Stock Option Plan is to advance the interests of the Company by providing an incentive to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified and competent persons who are important to us and upon whose efforts and judgment the success of the Company is largely dependent. Grants to be made under the 2001 Stock Option Plan are limited to the Company’s employees, including employees of the Company’s subsidiaries, the Company’s directors and consultants to the Company. The recipients of any grant under the 2001 Stock Option Plan, and the amount and terms of a specific grant, are determined by the Board of Directors of the Company. Should any option granted or stock awarded under the 2001 Stock Option Plan expire or become un-exercisable for any reason without having been exercised in full or fail to vest, the shares subject to the portion of the option not so exercised or lapsed will become available for subsequent stock or option grants.

2012 Amendment to the 2001 Stock Option Plan

On November 30, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized to increase the number of its common stock, $0.001 par value, available for issuance pursuant to the Corporation's 2001 Stock Option Plan from one million (1,000,000) shares to five million (5,000,000) shares among other material terms, subject to stockholder approval at the Annual Meeting. At the 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company (the “2012 Annual Meeting”) held on December 31, 2012, the majority stockholders of the Company approved the amendment of the Company’s 2001 Stock Options Plan (the “Amended 2001 Stock Option Plan”).

Summary of the Company’s Amended 2001 Stock Incentive Plan Activities

The Board of Directors of the Company did not grant any stock option or stock appreciation right under its amended 2001 Stock Incentive Plan as of the date when the financial statements were issued.

Note 8 – Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Lease

Prior to January 1, 2014 the Company leased an office space on a month-by-month basis for $300 per month.

On January 1, 2014, the Company entered into a non-cancelable operating lease for office space on a month to month basis for a period of 12 months from the date of signing at $300 per month effective upon signing. The Company agrees to pay the landlord during the term of this agreement a monthly office service fee of $300. Rent is due by the fifth (15th) day of each calendar month for the previous month’s occupancy and, therefore, a final rent payment in the amount of $300.00 will be due by December 15th, 2014. The Company must give thirty (30) days prior notice to vacate space and there will be no pro-rate for partial month use.

On January 1, 2015, the Company renewed the operating lease with the same terms and conditions expiring December 31, 2015.

- 31 -

Note 9 - Subsequent Events

The Company's management has evaluated the Company's financial information for possible material subsequent events through the date when the financial statements were issued. The Management of the Company determined that there were certain reportable subsequent events to be disclosed as follows:

Notes Payable - Related Party

On ~~March~~July 31, 2015, ~~notes~~ ~~payable~~the –Company issued a promissory note to a related party ofentity ~~$20,800~~ in the principal ~~and~~amount of $~~793.41~~500 inwith interest ~~were~~at ~~repaid~~0% per annum maturing on December 31, 2015.

~~Marketable~~On ~~Securities~~July 17, 2015, the Company issued a promissory note to a related party entity in the principal amount of $7,000 with interest at 0% per annum maturing on June 30, 2016.

On March 18, 2015, Transatlantic Mining Corp. (formerly Archean Star Resources Inc.) (“TMC”), a Toronto Stock Exchange listed company (Stock Symbol: TCO.V), issued the Company 500,000 shares of TMC common stock pursuant to the Option and Joint Venture Agreement. The Company did not value these marketable securities as there was no trading volume in them in the market.

Option to Joint Venture Amendment - Kinross Gold USA, Inc.

On March 2, 2015, Kinross Gold USA, Inc. made a $50,000 payment to the Company pursuant to the option agreement it has in place with the company.

Option to Joint Venture Amendment - Transatlantic Mining Corp.

TMC was to issue the Company an additional 750,000 shares of TMC common stock and pay $12,500 within 20 days, pursuant to the second amended option agreement on March 12, 2015. The Company received a $12,485 wire payment on April 7, 2015, to fulfill the required payment and was issued 750,000 shares of TMC on April 21, 2015.

- 32 -

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION OR PLAN OF OPERATION

THE FOLLOWING PLAN OF OPERATIONS SECTION SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH OUR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND THE NOTES THERETO INCLUDED IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q. ALL STATEMENTS IN THIS QUARTERLY REPORT RELATED TO OUR CHANGING FINANCIAL OPERATIONS AND EXPECTED FUTURE OPERATIONAL PLANS CONSTITUTE FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS. THE ACTUAL RESULTS MAY DIFFER MATERIALLY FROM THOSE ANTICIPATED OR EXPRESSED IN SUCH STATEMENTS. FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS ARE NOT GUARANTEES OF FUTURE PERFORMANCE.

This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our financial statements that have been prepared under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires our management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. We have disclosed all significant accounting policies in Note 2 to the financial statements included in this Form 10-Q.

Corporate Background

American Cordillera Mining Corporation or AMCOR, was incorporated on July 23, 1996, under the laws of the State of Nevada ~~for the purpose of acquiring, importing, marketing, and selling valuable antiquity and art items of Asian origin~~.

Since we changed business directions into a mining company, our exploration stage inception on March 30, 2012 to February 28, 2015, we have generated minimal revenue from our mining exploration business during out exploration stage, while incurring a net loss of approximately $654,729. Because we were unable to develop our Asian art and antiquities business into a financially viable business, the Board of Directors decided to redirect our business and to acquire mineral properties, leases on mineral properties and mining claims from Northern Adventures, Inc., a private Nevada corporation.

On December 28, 2012, AMCOR, AMCOR Exploration, Inc. a wholly owned subsidiary of American Cordillera Mining Corporation, Northern Adventures, LLC, and Northern Adventures, Inc. entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement to assign all right, title, and interest of specific NAI owned assets to AMCOR Exploration, with NAI shareholders, on a post acquisition basis, will hold a controlling 80.5% interest in American Cordillera Mining Corporation The Asset Purchase Agreement was executed on December 28, 2012 by issuing restricted common stock as consideration to Northern Adventures, Inc. and the exchange of certain promissory notes from Northern Adventures LLC detailed in the Asset Purchase Agreement. Under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement, AMCOR exchanged loans receivable due from NALLC in the amount of $382,500, including additional accrued interest of $30,564, and issued NAI 71,500,000 shares of restricted common stock as a total consideration for the assets acquired. With the issuance of the 71,500,000 shares to NAI for transferring to its shareholders as a dividend, they own the controlling interest in AMCOR.

The Asset Purchase Agreement related to the acquisition of: 1) all right, title and interest in five existing mineral leases consisting of 154 unpatented claims and 3 patented claims; 2) ownership of 83 unpatented mining claims; and 3) the transfer of all right, title and interest to an Option to Purchase Mineral Leases agreement relating to ten mineral leases granted by the State of Washington covering 4,664 acres of land and 27 unpatented mining claims. On December 6, 2012, the Option to Purchase Mineral Leases was amended between all the parties to the option agreement, Hydro Imaging, Inc., NAI and AMCOR. The amended option agreement speaks to the possibility of a large company entering into an agreement with HydroImaging, Inc., the owner of the prospecting rights and future leases; and the claims, in which case AMCOR would still exercise the existing option pursuant to the same terms and conditions, the only material difference being that it would then acquire all right, title and interest in the agreement between HydroImaging and the unrelated third party company, as compared to acquiring the prospecting rights and future leases directly. HydroImaging, Inc. is owned by David Boleneus, one of our directors.

At December 28, 2012 a total of $41,078 of interest had accrued on convertible promissory notes payable unrelated to NALLC with an aggregate principal amount of $486,000. All of these convertible promissory notes and the accrued interest on each note were converted to shares of restricted common stock at $.05 per share, as of December 28, 2012.

Plan of Operations

AMCOR intends to conduct exploration for gold, silver and base metal deposits and mineral targets in; 1) the Coeur d’Alene Mining District of northern Idaho; 2) in the Quartz Creek Mining District of western Montana; 3) in the Connor Creek Mining District of eastern Oregon; 4) in the Kootenai ARC district in Idaho; 5) the Judith-Moccasin Mining District in central Montana; and 6) the Toroda Creek, Wauconda and Republic Mining Districts in northern Washington. Our strategy is to explore for gold, silver and base metal deposits primarily in the Coeur d’Alene Mining District, a world class mining district and other known districts, by forming joint ventures with other companies who will potentially earn their interest in the property by contributing cash. Revival of operations in old districts can be easily justified on the basis of increases in prices of metals in the last decade.

- 33 -

~~joint~~several ~~ventures~~of ~~with~~these ~~other~~properties ~~companies~~would ~~who~~represent ~~will~~added ~~potentially~~value; ~~earn~~(2) ~~their~~emphasize ~~interest~~work in ~~the~~select ~~property~~mining bydistricts ~~contributing~~in ~~cash. Revival~~order ofto leverage operational experiences, similar geology and knowledge bases peculiar within a district; (3) assemble operations within hauling distance to operating custom mills in ~~old~~view ~~districts~~of ~~can~~establishing befuture ~~easily~~toll ~~justified~~milling onagreements; ~~the~~and ~~basis~~(4) operate in areas within reasonable commute distance to AMCOR’s base of ~~increases~~operations. The inemphasis ~~prices~~for locating of ~~metals~~projects in known mining districts is important because other mining prospects within the ~~last~~same ~~decade~~districts are also available from time to time for evaluation and/or acquisition.

Several important corporate priorities set by AMCOR management are expressed by the choice of these abandoned mines, exploration projects, and prospects. There are certain priorities that may contribute to the strategic advantages to AMCOR’s operations, as well as advantages in efficiencies, economy, and cost savings. These priorities are: (1) the properties be valuable for gold or silver for the purpose of leveraging future returns from the current prices of these metals; additional metal values also known to be present in several of these properties would represent added value; (2) emphasize work in select mining districts in order to leverage operational experiences, similar geology and knowledge bases peculiar within a district; (3) assemble operations within hauling distance to operating custom mills in view of establishing future toll milling agreements; and (4) operate in areas within reasonable commute distance to AMCOR’s base of operations. The emphasis for locating of projects in known mining districts is important because other mining prospects within the same districts are also available from time to time for evaluation and/or acquisition.

We plan to structure our operations in such a way as to keep our capital expenditures and administrative expenses to a minimum. Overhead and staff will be kept to a minimum and the majority of operational duties will be outsourced to consultants and independent contractors. We currently have no employees, but we expect to eventually hire three to five employees, commensurate with the development of our business and the availability of additional capital from the future sale of common stock, of which there is no assurance. We believe that most operational responsibilities can be handled by the officers and directors, and through the working partnership of other consultants. Two of our officers may draw salaries in the future, Frank H. Blair, our President and CEO, and Dwight Weigelt, CPA, our Secretary, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer. Our other officers and directors may be retained on an as needed basis and will be paid an hourly rate of to be determined by the Board and reimbursed any out of pocket expenses.

We anticipate that any additional funding that we require will be in the form of equity financing from the sale of our restricted Common Stock. However, there is no assurance that we will be able to raise sufficient funding from the sale of our restricted Common Stock. The risky nature of this enterprise and lack of tangible assets places debt financing beyond the credit-worthiness required by most banks or typical investors of corporate debt until such time as an economically viable mine can be demonstrated. We do not have any arrangements in place for any future equity financing. If we are unable to secure additional funding, we will cease or suspend operations. We have no plans, arrangements or contingencies in place in the event that we cease operations.

We will focus our future business on evolving into a growth-orientated, newly reorganized, early stage, and independent mineral and precious metal exploration company engaged in the acquisition, exploration, exploitation and development of mineral and precious metal properties; focusing our activities in the western United States. Through the recent acquisitions from NAI, AMCOR ~~owns~~acquired all, right, title and interest in 33 unpatented mining claims which make up four properties; 2) has the option to acquire ten certain mineral leases from the state of Washington covering 4,664 acres and 27 unpatented mining claims in Okanogan County; and 3) all right, title and interest in five existing mineral leases covering 128 unpatented claims and 3 patented claims.

Our material financial obligations for the future will include our public reporting expenses, transfer agent fees, bank fees, lease payments due on mineral properties and other recurring fees, combined with any additional operating expense related to our new business.

During the next twelve months we plan to engage in additional joint ventures and attempt to seek financing opportunities to commence a growth plan that will include the acquisition of additional mineral exploration properties as well as the possibility of selling additional equity in the form of common stock.

To accelerate the development program we will attempt to engage in other joint venture programs that will take responsibility, both financially and in labor, of the capital costs of early exploration. This economic strategy may allow us to utilize our own financial assets toward the exploration on our own properties and mineral leases.

Our future financial results will depend primarily on: (i) the ability to discover commercial quantities of precious or base metal on properties which we own or lease: (ii) the ability to continue to source and screen potential projects; (iii) the market price for precious metals; and (iv) the ability to fully implement our exploration and development programs on our nine projects, which is dependent on the availability of capital resources. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in any of these respects or that the prices of metals will be at a level allowing for profitable production, in the event we are able to define a commercial ore body, of which there is no assurance.

Bayhorse Mine

The date of our mining lease with Bayhorse Silver Mine LLC is June 26, 2012. The term of the lease on the 3three patented and 21 unpatented claims that make up the property is for 25 years, with an option to renew the lease for two additional successive terms of fifteen (15) years each, so long as there are ores or minerals being developed, mined, processed or marketed on a continuing basis or when exploration activities have advanced far enough that the construction activities related to the start up of ore production are expected to commence within one year. The initial consideration for the lease was a cash payment of ten thousand ($10,000) dollars. Annual minimum advanced royalties will be due the Lessor on the following basis. We are required to pay an annual advance minimum royalty of $10,000 on the first anniversary of this lease, $20,000 on the second anniversary, $30,000 on the third anniversary, $40,000 on the fourth anniversary, $50,000 on the fifth anniversary, and $50,000 on each anniversary thereafter. The first anniversary royalty payment was deferred until December 31, 2015, or payable within ten business days after AMCOR secures funding in excess of $500,000. In July 2014, the second anniversary royalty payment was deferred until December 31, 2014, then it

- 34 -

~~expected to commence within one year. The initial consideration for the lease~~ was a cash payment of ten thousand ($10,000) dollars. Annual minimum advanced royalties will be due the Lessor on the following basis. We are required to pay an annual advance minimum royalty of $10,000 on the first anniversary of this lease, $20,000 on the second anniversary, $30,000 on the third anniversary, $40,000 on the fourth anniversary, $50,000 on the fifth anniversary, and $50,000 on each anniversary thereafter. The first anniversary royalty payment was deferred until December 31, 2015, or payable within ten business days after AMCOR secures funding in excess of $500,000. In July 2014, the second anniversary royalty payment was deferred until December 31, 2014, then it was further deferred on December 30, 2014 until December 31, 2015, or payable within ten business days after AMCOR secures funding in excess of $500,000.

There is a work requirement of ten thousand ($10,000) during the first year of the lease for the benefit of the property and during the second and subsequent years the amount increases to fifty thousand ($50,000) dollars per year. The first year's work requirement was deferred until it could to be accomplished at the earliest possible time, weather permitting. Our joint venture partner, Bayhorse Silver Inc. (“BSI”) (formerly Kent Exploration, Inc.), has satisfied the first year work requirement. The lease calls for a sliding scale royalty payment to the property owner based on the Net Smelter Return (“NSR”). The below is a schedule of the royalty payments due in the event the property is placed into production at some future date, of which there is no assurance.

On December 4, 2013, AMCOR signed an Option and Joint Venture Agreement with BSI, a Canadian mineral exploration company, whereby BSI can acquire an option to earn an 80% interest in the Bayhorse Silver Mine ("Bayhorse") in east-central Oregon State. The terms of the Agreement called for a payment of US$20,000 from BSI to AMCOR subsequent to the execution of the agreement and that payment was received on December 5, 2013. To earn the 80% interest the BSI is required to conduct a minimum of US$100,000 per year on exploration expenditures on the property on, or before, each of the first two anniversaries of the Agreement, US$300,000 on or before the third anniversary of the Agreement and expend US$500,000 on or before the fourth and fifth anniversaries of the Agreement. In addition, BSI issued 500,000 shares of its restricted common stock to AMCOR, per the agreement, on December 16, 2013. An additional 500,000 restricted shares of BSI shall be issued to AMCOR on the third anniversary of the Agreement and 500,000 restricted shares on the fifth anniversary of the Agreement. BSI will assume the obligations of the underlying lease agreement with Northern Adventures, Inc.

On February 12, 2014, Bayhorse Silver Inc. issued 125,000 shares of its subsidiary, Silcom Systems Inc. (Silcom), restricted common stock to the Company for no consideration. The issuance was dividend shares from their subsidiary, Silcom, given to shareholders of Bayhorse Silver Inc. There is no market for the shares currently.

Transatlantic Mining Corp. (formerly Archean Star) Agreement

On February 5, 2013, we entered into a definitive Option and Joint Venture Agreement with Transatlantic Mining Corp. ("TMC") pertaining to 20 unpatented claims leased by AMCOR pursuant to a Mining Lease with Northern Adventures, LLC. On June 27, 2012, Northern Adventures, LLC originally entered into the Mining Lease with Northern Adventures, Inc., and AMCOR assumed the rights in that Mining Lease from Northern Adventures, Inc. pursuant to the Asset Purchase Agreement dated December 28, 2013. As part of the transaction, AMCOR received 500,000 shares of TMC common stock and was to receive an additional 500,000 shares of TMC common stock on the second and third anniversaries of the agreement, subject to TMC going forward with the agreement after year one. (See Note 6) TMC will assume the obligations of the underlying lease agreement and paid an up-front fee of $7,500 to AMCOR in addition to $5,000 already received by AMCOR indirectly from TMC. Under the terms of the agreement TMC can earn up to 80% ownership interest in the property lease by expending $2,100,000 over a three year period, with a minimum expenditure of $700,000 in year one of the agreement. AMCOR’s interest shall be a Carried Interest until such time as a Bankable Feasibility Study has been produced or a Decision to Mine has been made. A Carried Interest means that AMCOR is not required to contribute any capital or pay any costs related to exploration or development of the property until such time as the joint venture is formed. A Bankable Feasibility Study is an independently audited document that analyses all technical and financial risks before the construction of mine including: capital costs, grades, permits, taxation, cash flow, strip ratio, politics, water, power, labor, revenues, royalties, metallurgy, milling and transport. As of November 30, 2013, TMC has expended approximately $485,000 on the project. TMC agreed to issue an additional 500,000 shares of its restricted common stock to AMCOR on, or before, February 5, 2014, per the joint venture option agreement's second year requirements related to the Monitor mine. On March 12, 2014, TMC issued the Company an additional 500,000 shares of TMC common stock pursuant to the Option and Joint Venture Agreement. The Company valued these marketable securities at CAD65,000 based on CAD0.13 per share on the date of issuance (CAD1 approximates $1) credited the same amount to the mineral rights as, a return of investment in mineral rights, upon receipt of the same on March 12, 2014, then marked to market on a quarterly basis and recorded the change in fair value of the securities as unrealized gain (loss) of the marketable securities in other comprehensive income (loss). As of February 5, 2015, another 500,000 TMC shares was due AMCOR. These shares were issued to AMCOR on March 18, 2015.

- 35 -

As of September 30, 2014, TMC completed a multi-phase surface exploration program which consisted of mapping, rock chip and soil sampling, and location of an additional 85 unpatented mining claims owned by Northern Adventures LLC, but the costs related to the acquisition of these additional mining claims was paid for by TMC, but deemed to be part of the agreement pursuant to the standard area of influence. The initial surface work was undertaken to delineate the mineralized structures and veins that were known to exist on the Richmond and Monitor properties. Initial work was completed related to opening the Adair adit, which was a haulage way that was driven in the 1920’s. Access was gained back to a point approximately 3,200 feet from the portal. Additional work will be required to be completed to gain complete access to the balance of the haulage way, which estimated from historical maps to continue for another 2,000 feet or more. Applications have been made to the United States Forest Service to receive permits to undertake a rehabilitation of the Adair portal and to drill up to 12 surface diamond drill holes.

Pursuant to TMC Option and Joint Venture Agreement TMC is required to expend a minimum expenditure of $700,000 in year one of the agreement. As of November 30, 2014, only $593,274 had been expended by TMC on the Monitor-Richmond property. The Company has deferred until December 31, 2015 the year three advanced minimum royalty payment from TMC, or payable within ten business days after AMCOR secures funding in excess of $500,000. The Option and Joint Venture Agreement was renegotiated on March 15, 2015, whereby: 1) the minimum year one $700,000 work requirement was deemed satisfied, 2) TMC is obligated to expend a minimum of $700,000 on the property between February 5, 2015 and February 5, 2016, and 3) TMC is obligated to expend a minimum of $700,000 on the property between February 5, 2016 and February 5, 2017. As a consideration for agreeing to the amendment to the Option and Joint Venture agreement, TMC was to issue AMCOR an additional 750,000 shares of TMC common stock and pay $12,500 within twenty days after the effective date. The Company received a $12,485 wire payment on April 7, 2015, to fulfill the required payment and was issued 750,000 shares of TMC on April 21, 2015.

TMC, has filed an additional 85 Monitor claims and Northern Adventures, LLC, is the claimant on those. AMCOR has interest in those claims through its Mining Lease with Northern Adventures, Inc.

Kinross Agreement

On April 5, 2013 we exercised an option to acquire three mineral leases located in Okanogan County, Washington, pursuant to an Option to Purchase Mineral Leases between Hydro Imaging, Inc. and Northern Adventures, Inc. (NAI) entered into on June 25, 2012 and amended on December 7, 2012, which option was transferred to us on December 28, 2012 by NAI pursuant to an Asset Purchase Agreement. The original option was granted by HydroImaging, Inc (Hydro), a private company owned solely by David Boleneus, currently a member of our board of directors, to NAI on June 25, 2012. Under the terms of the original option Hydro granted the right to acquire ten leases granted by the Department of Natural Resources for the State of Washington totaling 4,583.76 acres and 27 unpatented mining claims located in the Toroda Creek-Wauconda Mining district in Okanogan country in the State of Washington for the payment of an exercise price of $10,000.

An amendment to the Option to Purchase Mineral Leases on December 7, 2012 provided Hydro the authority to enter into a Mining Lease and Assignment agreement with Kinross Gold USA, Inc. (Kinross), as an alternative to transferring the ten leases and subject to Hydro executing an agreement with Kinross. As an alternative to acquiring the ten leases and pursuant to the amendment, AMCOR was also granted an option to acquire all right, title and interest in any agreement reached between Kinross and Hydro. On February 28, 2013, Hydro concluded a Mining Lease and Assignment agreement with Kinross transferring seven of the ten mineral leases totaling 2,934.56 acres and a lease on 27 unpatented mining claims located in Okanogan County, Washington. The seven state leases were transferred from Hydro to Kinross and approved by the State of Washington on March 27, 2013. Pursuant to the terms of the Kinross agreement, Kinross will assume all of the underlying obligations, annual rental expenses, and work requirements related to the seven leases and 27 unpatented mining claims. The remaining three state mining leases totaling 1,649.2 acres will be transferred from Hydro to AMCOR, subject to approval from the Department of Natural Resources for the State of Washington.

Under the terms of the Mining Lease and Assignment agreement Kinross will pay AMCOR production royalties as follows: a 1% net smelter return royalty on all minerals extracted from the area covered by the 7 leases and a 2.5% net smelter return royalty on all minerals extracted from the area covered by the 27 unpatented mining claims. The amount of royalties to be paid (both production royalties and advance royalty payments) are capped at $3 million per lease. Kinross will also pay advance royalty payments in the aggregate amount of $1 million as follows: $15,000 payable within 7 days of February 28, 2013, the effective date, $15,000 payable within 15 days of the effective date, $40,000 payable on February 28, 2014, $50,000 payable on February 28, 2015, and thereafter the annual advance royalty payment is to increase by 5% per year up to a maximum annual payment of $100,000. Kinross satisfied the initial two $15,000 payments as well as the first year payment of $40,000. The obligation to pay the advance royalty payment shall cease once an aggregate of $1 million has been paid. Advance minimum royalty payments shall be creditable against the production royalties. The production royalty payments for Minerals produced from the state leases shall be capped at $3,000,000 for each of the seven leases, including any advanced royalty payments to be offset. Kinross also undertakes to make such payments and undertake such other actions necessary to maintain the seven state mining leases and the unpatented claims in effect and good standing.

On February 28, 2013, Hydro concluded the Mining Lease and Assignment agreement with Kinross concerning seven of the ten mineral leases totaling 2,934.56 acres and a lease on 27 unpatented mining claims located in Okanogan County, Washington. Seven of the state leases were transferred from Hydro to Kinross and approved by the State of Washington on March 27, 2013. Pursuant to the terms of the Kinross agreement, Kinross will assume all of the underlying obligations, annual rental expenses, and work requirements related to the seven leases and 27 unpatented mining claims.

- 36 -

Results of Operations

Results of operations for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, compared to the ~~three~~six months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2014 ~~are as follows:~~

Revenue

We generated no revenue from sale of metal bearing concentrate for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, or the ~~three~~six months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2014.

We earned $050,000 in royalty revenue for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~February~~May 2830, 2015, and $040,000 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2014. The cost of revenue was $714,710 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, in comparison with $~~202~~7,522 for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2014.

Operating Expenses

For the ~~three~~six months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, we incurred $131,~~275~~164 in professional fees and $~~977~~1,694 in general and administrative expenses in comparison with the ~~three~~six months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2014 where we incurred $128,~~197~~875 in professional fees and $~~216~~4,894 in general and administrative expenses. We expect operating expenses for our 2015 fiscal year to remain comparable in comparison with that for our 2014 fiscal year.

Net cash ~~used~~provided inby operating activities for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015 was $~~5,073~~215 which includes net ~~loss~~income of $310,~~381~~505, offset by a decrease in prepaid expense of $900, a decrease in accounts payable of $212,~~750~~317, and an increase in accrued expense of $1,~~058~~127.

Net cash provided by investing activities for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015 was $012,500 which includes cash provided by return of investment in mineral rights of $012,500.

Net cash ~~provided~~used byin financing activities for the ~~three~~six months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015 was $512,~~000~~800 which includes cash proceeds from related party notes payable of $511,000 and cash repayments of related party notes payable of $23,800.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

With respect to long term liquidity (periods in excess of one year), we are unable to reasonably project or otherwise make assumptions concerning future cash flows or amounts of funds that may be available to us. Although lease royalty agreements are in place, those can be cancelled at any time by the other party. With additional funding to carry on and support operations, management anticipates that our operating expenses would increase in the long-term as a result of an increase in sales and marketing activities, as well as general and administrative costs. Long-term liquidity is directly dependent upon either the future success of our business or our ability to identify and acquire a favorable business opportunity through merger or acquisition. Without reasonable funding in the near future, we would attempt to enter into one or more business transactions that could involve a merger or sale of our company and/or the sale of some or all of its assets to protect our shareholders’ interest and investments. No binding merger or acquisition agreements have been entered into at this time.

Our cash in the bank at ~~February~~May 2831, 2015 was $120. We do not have any available lines of credit. Since inception we have financed our operations from private placements of equity securities, royalty revenue, and loans. OnAt ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, we had ~~$28,000 due for~~ related party convertible notes payable ~~and~~of $5128,~~800~~000 ~~due~~and ~~for~~ related party notes payable of $34,000. We intend to pay these notes from private placements of equity securities and royalty revenue, but if we are unable to raise additional capital or receive further loans on an as needed basis, we will have to curtail or cease our operations.

Our recent cash ~~burn~~surplus rate in our operations over the ~~three~~six months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, has been approximately $12,000 per month. We expect that that cash ~~burn~~surplus rate to ~~increase~~decrease over the next quarter due to ~~accounting~~a ~~and~~decrease ~~audit~~in ~~costs~~royalty revenue. Given this recent rate of use of cash in our operations, we do not have sufficient capital to carry on operations past ~~May~~July 2015. Our long term capital requirements and the adequacy of our available funds will depend on many factors, including the reporting company costs, public relations fees, and operating expenses, among others. If we are unable to raise additional capital to repay loans, generate sufficient revenue, or receive further loans on an as needed basis, we will have to curtail or cease our operations.

We believe that we could experience negative operating cash flow for the foreseeable future. At ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, we had outstanding liabilities of $~~155~~127,~~699~~112 of which $7962,~~800~~000 was due to convertible and non-convertible notes payable. If our outstanding non-convertible loans are not repaid before December 31, 2015 and our convertible debt is not converted to equity before December 31, 2015, and we cannot repay this debt on the maturity date, we will be required to ask for extensions from the lenders or engage in another equity offering to provide capital to repay the debt. If the lenders do not convert their debt to equity and we cannot raise further capital through and equity offering, there is a high probability that the company would become insolvent and could potentially go out of business.

- 37 -

further capital through and equity offering, there is a high probability that the company would become insolvent and could potentially go out of business.

Our existing cash position is not sufficient to support our operations. Accordingly, we continue to examine a range of possible funding sources, including additional strategic alliances, additional equity or debt private placements, the sale of existing assets, as well as the possibility of entering into one or more business transactions that could involve a merger or sale of our company and/or the sale of some or all of its assets. We do not currently have any contractual restrictions on our ability to incur debt. Any such indebtedness could contain covenants that would restrict our operations. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available on terms favorable to us, or at all. If equity or convertible debt securities are issued, the percentage ownership of our stockholders will be reduced, stockholders may experience additional dilution and such securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of our common stock. This effect is attributed to the fact that while additional shares of common stock are issued from our treasury, our earnings at that particular moment remain consistent and, therefore, the earnings per share decreases. If we are unsuccessful in these efforts, we will be required to curtail our ongoing operations. If we were unable to sufficiently curtail our costs in such a situation, we might be forced to seek protection of the courts through reorganization, bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding, or cease operations completely.

Going Concern

Our independent auditors have included an explanatory paragraph in their report on the audits of our consolidated financial statements for the year ended November 30, 2014, which express substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included in our 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have suffered recurring losses from operations since inception and have a deficit accumulated during the exploration stage that raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Please see Note 2 of the financial statements.

Subsequent Events

Notes Payable - Related Party

~~Marketable~~On ~~Securities~~July 17, 2015, the Company issued a promissory note to a related party entity in the principal amount of $7,000 with interest at 0% per annum maturing on June 30, 2016.

Option to Joint Venture Amendment - Kinross Gold USA, Inc.

On March 2, 2015, Kinross Gold USA, Inc. made a $50,000 payment to the Company pursuant to the option agreement is has in place with the company.

Option to Joint Venture Amendment - Transatlantic Mining Corp.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not required

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

In connection with the preparation of this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, an evaluation was carried out by our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act)). Disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Based on its evaluation, and in light of the previously-identified material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, as of November 30, 2014, described in the 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of May 31, 2015, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

- 38 -

and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. Based on its evaluation, and in light of the previously-identified material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, as of November 30, 2014, described in the 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of February 28, 2015, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. There has been no progress towards remediating our previously disclosed material weakness due to the lack of funding.

- 3938 -

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Registrant is not currently involved in any litigation.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and are not required to provide the information under this item.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE

[Not Applicable]

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.


Exhibits

3.1	Articles of Incorporation*

3.2	By-Laws*

10.1	2001 Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the December 31, 2008 Annual Report on Form 10-K) (File No. 000-50738)

10.2	Option and Joint Venture Agreement between AMCOR and Archean Star Resources, Inc. dated February 5, 2013 (incorporated hereto by reference to Form 8-K, Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on February 11, 2013, file number 000-50738)

10.3	Notice of Intent to Exercise Option Agreement between AMCOR and HydroImaging, Inc dated April 5, 2013. (incorporated hereto by reference to Form 8-K, Exhibit 10.1 filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on April 11, 2013, file number 000-50738)

10.4	Mining Lease and Assignment agreement between Kinross Gold USA, Inc. and Hydro Imaging, Inc. dated February 28, 2013. (incorporated hereto by reference to Form 8-K, Exhibit 10.2 filed with the Securities and Exchange commission on April 11, 2013, file number 000-50738)

31.1	Section 302(a) Principal Executive Officer Certification

31.2	Section 302(a) Principal Financial Officer Certification

32.1	Section 1350 Certifications

32.2	Section 1350 Certifications
* Incorporated by reference to the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form 10SB12G filed on May 3, 2004, File No. 000-50738

- 4039 -

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

APD ANTIQUITIES, INC.

BY: /s/ Frank H. Blair Date: ~~May~~July 520, 2015 Frank H. Blair President, CEO

- 4140 -

Filing Compare · AMERICAN CORDILLERA MINING Corp