UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

~~TANNUAL~~T ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, ~~2012~~2013

£ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________ to ______________

Med One Oak, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	000-49999	1390-~~4025362~~0955160
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)	(Commission File Number)	(IRS Employer Identification Number)
9201 Pinecroft Drive, The Woodlands, TX 77380
(Address of principal executive offices)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (281) 651-2737
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (281) 348-4020

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

None

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock, par value $0.001

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act o £ Yes x T No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act o £ Yes x T No

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x T Yes o £ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ~~Yes £ No T~~

~~Indicate~~x Yes o by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. £No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer £o Accelerated filer £o Non-accelerated filer £o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company Tx

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). T oYes x ~~Yes £~~ No

Based on the per share price at which the registrant’s common stock was last sold, ~~prior~~as toof the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on such date was $214,~~862~~309. Solely for the purposes of this calculation, all executive officers and directors of the registrant and all ~~shareholders reporting~~ beneficial ~~ownership~~owners of more than 10% of the registrant’s common stock are considered to be affiliates of the registrant.

As of ~~February~~March 626, ~~2013~~2014, the Company had 2,~~209~~609,911 shares of common stock, par value $0.001, issued and outstanding.

MED ONE OAK, INC.

(formerly, BidGive International, Inc.)

FORM 10-K

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
	Part I
Item 1	Business	2
Item 1A	Risk Factors	35
Item 1B	Unresolved Staff Comments	35
Item 2	Properties	35
Item 3	Legal Proceedings	45
Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	45
	Part II
Item 5	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	56
Item 6	Selected Financial Data	67
Item 7	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	68
Item 7A	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	912
Item 8	Financial Statements and Supplemental Data	912
Item 9	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosures	912
Item 9A	Controls and Procedures	1012
Item 9B	Other Information	1113
	Part III
Item 10	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	1214
Item 11	Executive Compensation	1417
Item 12	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	1619
Item 13	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	1821
Item 14	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	1821
Item 15	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	1922
Signatures		2023

Table of Contents

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”) contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Rule 175 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Rule 3b-6 of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, our beliefs and our assumptions. Words such as “anticipate,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks” and “estimates” and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements. Actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, may be materially different from those described in the forward-looking statements due to a number of risk factors. Such risks and uncertainties include those set forth under the caption "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Safe Harbor Statement" and elsewhere in this Annual Report.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

~~Corporate Background~~OVERVIEW

We are Med One Oak, Inc. (“Med One,” “we”, “our”, “us” or the “Company”) ~~was originally incorporated as Rolfe Enterprises~~, ~~Inc.~~and ~~under~~we ~~the~~are ~~laws~~a ofprovider ~~the state~~ of ~~Florida~~operational onand ~~May~~financial 6,consulting ~~1996~~services. We ~~were~~help ~~formed~~clients asimprove aperformance, ~~“blind~~comply ~~pool”~~with orcomplex ~~“blank~~regulations, ~~check”~~strategically ~~company~~grow ~~whose~~their business, ~~plan~~expand ~~was~~their tooperations ~~seek~~into tonew ~~acquire~~markets, amarket ~~business~~their ~~opportunity~~service ~~through~~and ~~completion~~product ~~of a merger~~offerings, ~~exchange~~streamline ~~of stock~~operations, orand ~~other~~reduce ~~similar type of transaction~~costs. WeOur ~~were~~professionals ~~reincorporated~~employ ontheir ~~April~~expertise ~~12, 2004~~ in ~~the~~healthcare ~~state~~administration, ~~of Delaware as BidGive International~~management, ~~Inc.~~finance ~~The~~and ~~purpose~~operations ~~of the reincorporation was~~ to ~~change~~provide our ~~name~~clients ~~and~~with ~~state~~specialized ofanalyses ~~domicile.~~and Wecustomized ~~commenced~~advice ~~operations~~and ~~during~~solutions ~~2003,~~that ~~with~~are ~~our~~tailored ~~principal~~to ~~operations~~address ~~consisting~~each ofclient’s ~~e-commerce~~particular ~~marketing~~challenges and ~~retailing~~opportunities. OnSince ~~March 31~~2013, ~~2011,~~ we ~~sold~~have ~~our~~primarily ~~operations~~provided ~~and~~business ~~became~~consulting aservices ~~shell~~to ~~company~~financially ~~with~~sound ~~limited~~organizations ~~operations.~~in ~~The consideration for this transaction consisted of~~ the ~~buyer’s~~healthcare ~~assumption~~industry ofin ~~the~~and ~~liabilities~~around ofHouston, ~~the operations of the Company~~Texas.

We ~~are~~were ~~authorized~~originally toincorporated ~~issue~~as ~~10,000,000~~Rolfe ~~shares of preferred stock~~Enterprises, $0Inc.~~001~~ ~~par~~under ~~value,~~the ~~and~~laws ~~150,000,000~~of ~~shares~~the state of ~~Common~~Florida ~~Stock.~~on AtMay ~~February~~ 6, ~~2013,~~1996. weWe ~~had~~were ~~2,209,911~~formed ~~shares~~as ofa ~~Common~~“blind ~~Stock~~pool” ~~issued~~or ~~and~~“blank ~~outstanding~~check” ~~and~~company ~~had~~whose ~~issued~~business noplan ~~shares~~was ofto ~~our~~seek ~~preferred~~to ~~stock. On~~acquire ~~October~~a 8,business ~~2012~~opportunity ~~the~~through ~~Company~~completion ~~authorized~~of a 10merger, ~~for~~exchange 1of ~~reverse~~ stock, ~~split~~or onother ~~its~~similar ~~outstanding~~type ~~shares~~ of ~~Common~~transaction. ~~Stock,~~We ~~which~~were ~~became~~reincorporated ~~effective~~ on ~~December~~April 612, ~~2012.~~2004 ~~All~~in ~~share~~the ~~amounts~~state ~~have~~of ~~been~~Delaware ~~retroactively~~as ~~restated~~BidGive toInternational, ~~reflect this reverse stock split~~Inc.

We ~~maintain~~commenced operations during 2003, with our principal ~~executive~~operations ~~offices~~consisting atof ~~9201~~e-commerce ~~Pinecroft,~~marketing ~~The~~and ~~Woodlands, TX 77380~~retailing. ~~The~~On ~~Company~~March ~~has~~31, ~~had~~2011, ~~limited~~we sold our operations ~~since~~and ~~March~~became ~~31,~~a ~~2011.~~shell ~~Such~~company with limited operations. ~~consist~~On ofJanuary a1, ~~search~~2013, ~~for~~we hired an ~~appropriate~~experienced ~~transaction~~Chief ~~such~~Executive asOfficer aand ~~merger~~Chief Financial Officer (collectively, ~~acquisition~~“Executives”), ~~reverse~~who ~~merger~~provided oroperational ~~other~~and ~~business~~financial ~~combination~~consulting ~~with~~services anto ~~operating~~healthcare ~~business~~companies located in and around Houston, Texas, while also working towards identifying and effecting one or ~~other~~more ~~appropriate~~transactions ~~financial~~to ~~transaction.~~acquire ~~See~~assets ~~“Current~~and/or ~~Business”~~operations ~~below~~in the healthcare industry.

~~Current~~We ~~Business~~hired additional executives and other experienced professionals beginning on October 1, 2013. During March 2014, we signed a formal management services agreement with a hospital located in The Woodlands, Texas, under which we will provide certain management services based on fixed hourly rates. We also hired additional employees who will provide such services along with our current employees.

~~The~~Our ~~Company~~corporate ~~has~~offices ~~had~~are ~~limited~~in ~~operations~~The ~~since March 31~~Woodlands, ~~2011. Since 2012~~Texas, ~~our~~which ~~operations~~is ~~have~~included ~~consisted of working towards effecting one or more transactions to acquire or purchase as of yet unidentified assets and operations~~ in the ~~healthcare~~metropolitan ~~industry.~~area ~~There~~of ~~can be no assurance that this plan will be successfully implemented. Until a transaction is effectuated~~Houston, ~~we do not expect to have significant operations~~Texas. ~~However, any such acquisition or purchase may involve:~~

OPERATIONS

We are a provider of operational and financial consulting services. We help clients improve performance, comply with complex regulations, strategically grow their business, expand their operations into new markets, market their service and product offerings, streamline operations, and reduce costs. To date, we have operated under a single business segment and 100% of our revenues have been derived from providing consulting services to organizations in the healthcare industry, located in and around Houston, Texas.

Table of Contents

Our professionals develop and implement solutions to help clients address challenges relating to financial management, strategy, operational and organizational effectiveness, marketing, business development, and regulatory compliance. We also provide consulting services related to hospital or healthcare organization performance improvement, cost management, physician practice management and interim management. We anticipate offering additional management services beginning during 2014, such as human resources, billing, collections, and/or clinical staffing.

Clients

Our clients are all financially sound, privately owned organizations, and consist of hospitals, health systems, outpatient emergency rooms, ambulatory surgery centers, and physician practices, primarily in and around Houston, Texas. Our operations are currently small in nature and our revenues to date have been derived from services provided to a small number of clients, including a related party.

During 2013, we recognized total revenue of $795,161, consisting of $546,217 from a related party and $248,944 from two companies who were not related parties, all of which were located in Houston, Texas or the surrounding area. Revenue during 2013 from our related party represented 69% of our total revenue and revenue from our two other clients represented 23% and 8% of our total revenue. The loss of one or more such clients could have a material adverse effect if that business was not quickly replaced.

Acquisition Strategy

Our business model includes organic growth and growth through acquisition. While we are currently seeking opportunities to organically grow our operational and financial consulting operations, we are also working to identify and effectuate acquisition of assets and/or operations in the healthcare industry, which may include management services operations to further expand on our operational and financial consulting services, or healthcare providers such as hospitals and ancillary service providers. However, there can be no assurance that we will identify and successfully effectuate any such acquisition.

If we are able to identify and successfully effective an acquisition, any such acquisition may involve:

·	a material change in the Company’s present capitalization;

·	a material change in the composition of the Company’s board of directors;

·	the issuance of a significant amount of the Company’s securities; and

· the acquisition of significant assets and commencement of ~~business~~a ~~operations~~new operating segment.

It is anticipated that opportunities may come to our attention from various sources, including our management, stockholders, professional advisors, members of the financial community, and others who may present unsolicited proposals. At this time, we have no plans, understandings, agreements, or commitments with any individual or entity in regard to any business opportunities. In evaluating a transaction, we analyze all available factors and make a determination based on a composite of available facts, without reliance on any single factor.

2Depending on the size and nature of any such acquisition, the Company’s operations following its consummation of a transaction might include new operating segments. And there may be various risks inherent in any such acquisition, the nature and magnitude of which cannot be predicted. The Company may also be subject to increased governmental regulation following a transaction; however, it is not possible at this time to predict the nature or magnitude of such increased regulation, if any.

Employees and Consultants

Our success depends on our ability to attract, retain, and develop highly talented professionals by creating a work environment where both individuals and teams thrive and individuals are rewarded not only for their own contributions but also for the success of our organization as a whole.

We hired two experienced executives on January 1, 2013, and hired additional executives and other professionals beginning October 1, 2013. At December 31, 2013, we had three employees, all of which were full time and revenue generating. As of March 26, 2014, we had four employees, all of whom were full time. We plan to use contract employees, consultants, and outside attorneys as necessary. We also plan to engage project consultants and contractors who supplement our full-time employees on an as-needed basis. Use of these contract employees, consultants, attorneys, and project consultants will allow us to maintain a pool of talent with a variable cost structure that enables us to adapt quickly to market demands.

Table of Contents

~~The Company’s operations following its consummation of a transaction will be dependent on the nature of the transaction.~~ There ~~may~~are ~~also~~no becollective ~~various~~bargaining ~~risks~~agreements ~~inherent~~ in ~~the~~effect ~~transaction,~~with ~~the~~respect ~~nature and magnitude of which cannot be predicted. The Company may also be subject~~ to ~~increased~~any ~~governmental regulation following a transaction; however, it is not possible at this time to predict the nature or magnitude~~ of ~~such~~our ~~increased regulation, if any~~employees.

WeBusiness ~~expect~~Development to continue to incur moderate losses each quarter until a transaction considered appropriate by management is effectuated. On January 1, 2013, we issued a Promissory Note to a related party under which we have the right to draw up to $1,500,000 for working capital purposes, with any such debt to be repaid in cash or shares of our Common Stock, at the mutual agreement of the parties. Growth of operations or acquisition of business or assets will likely be dependent upon our ability to issue additional debt and~~/or~~ ~~equity securities in exchange for additional capital or in conjunction with a merger or acquisition transaction.~~Marketing

Our business development activities are aimed at developing relationships and building a strong reputation with key sources of business and referrals, especially hospital directors, health system administrators, law firms, and the offices of the chief executive officer, chief financial officer, and general counsel or organizations.

We believe that excellent service delivery to clients is critical to building and maintaining relationships and our reputation, and we emphasize the importance of client service to all of our employees. We actively seek to identify new business opportunities, and frequently receive referrals and repeat business from past and current clients.

We are initially focusing on marketing our services to small to mid-sized healthcare entities in Houston, Texas and the surrounding areas, including hospitals, surgery centers, home health agencies, free-standing emergency rooms, physician practices, and other ancillary healthcare services such as pharmacies, imaging, diagnostic, and treatment centers.

Financial expectations

We expect to continue to incur moderate losses each quarter until a transaction considered appropriate by management is effectuated or until our management services business grows to a level that will sustain our ongoing operations. In order to fund operations during this time, we issued a note on January 1, 2013, to a related party (“Note”), under which we have the right to draw up to $1,500,000 for working capital purposes, with any such debt to be repaid in cash or shares of our Common Stock, at the mutual agreement of the parties. As of December 31 2013, the outstanding balance on the note was $456,752, which is payable in full on January 31, 2015, and approximately $1,043,000 remained available for future working capital needs. We believe growth of operations and/or acquisition of business or assets will be dependent upon our ability to issue additional debt and/or equity in conjunction with a merger or acquisition transaction.

Government Regulation

We are not currently aware of any existing federal, state, governmental regulations which are specific to our business. We will continue to monitor and comply with all existing and future governmental regulations as they become effective and applicable to us. If we are able to identify and effectuate an acquisition of operations or assets, we may become subject to increased governmental regulation; however, it is not possible at this time to predict the nature or magnitude of such increased regulation, if any.

Competition

We are in direct competition with other entities providing management services to the healthcare industry. We are also in ~~our~~direct ~~efforts~~competition with other entities seeking to ~~locate~~acquire aassets ~~suitable~~and/or ~~transaction~~operations ~~partner~~in the healthcare industry. Included in the competition are healthcare services companies, business development companies, special purpose acquisition corporations, venture capital firms, small business investment companies, venture capital affiliates of industrial and financial companies, broker-dealers, investment bankers, management consultant firms and private individual investors.

~~Employees~~Available ~~and Consultants~~Information

~~During~~We ~~2012,~~maintain ~~the~~our ~~Company~~principal ~~had one~~ executive ~~officer.~~offices Onat ~~December~~9201 31Pinecroft, ~~2012~~The Woodlands, DrTX 77380. Our ~~Asit~~telephone ~~Choksi~~number ~~resigned~~is ~~from~~(281) ~~his position as a member of the Board of Directors as well as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary and Treasurer~~348-4020. OnOur ~~January~~common 1,stock ~~2013,~~trades ~~the~~on ~~Board of Directors appointed new officers of~~ the ~~Company~~OTCQB inunder the ~~positions~~symbol ~~of Chief Executive Officer and President, Chief Financial Officer, and Vice-President~~“MOAK”. ~~None of our employees are represented by a labor union. We currently have no other employees and plan to use consultants, attorneys and outside accountants as necessary.~~

Table of Contents

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

We ~~began~~lease ~~leasing~~ office space and services located at 9201 Pinecroft, The Woodlands, TX Texas, 77380, from a related party, on a month to month basis. Our monthly rent was $500 per month from January 1, 2013, ~~pursuant~~through toSeptember a30, ~~month-to-month~~2013, ~~arrangement~~and at$750 aper ~~charge~~month ofbeginning ~~$500~~October ~~per~~1, ~~month~~2013.

Table of Contents

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

From time to time, we may be involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of our operations in the normal course of business. As of March 26, 2014, there were no pending or threatened lawsuits that could reasonably be expected to have a material effect on the results of our operations. No legal proceedings are known to be contemplated by any governmental authority. We are not aware of any legal proceedings in which any director, officer or affiliate of the Company, any owner of record or beneficially of more than 5% of any class of voting securities of the Company, or any associate of any such director, officer, affiliate or security holder of the Company, is a party adverse to the Company or any of its subsidiaries or has a material interest adverse to the Company or any of its subsidiaries.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFTEY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.

Table of Contents

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

~~Our~~Market Common Stock is approved for trading on the OTCQB under the symbol “MOAK” and “BDGVD” beginning January 22, 2013 and prior to January 22, 2013, respectively. Although the Company’s Common Stock is approved for trading, there is no established public trading market for our Common Stock as it is quoted on a very limited and sporadic basis. Any trading in our Common Stock is subject to restrictions imposed by the penny stock rules. The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted rules which regulate broker-dealer practices in “penny stocks,” which generally means stocks with a price of less than $5.00. Prior to engaging in certain transactions involving a penny stock, broker-dealers must make a special written determination that it is a suitable investment for the purchaser and must receive the purchasers’ written consent to the transaction and written acknowledgement of receipt of a risk disclosure statement. The broker-dealer must also provide the customer with information regarding the current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction, and a monthly account statement showing the market value of each penny stock held. These disclosure requirements will have the effect of making it more difficult for an active trading market to develop in our stock and for an investor in the proposed public offering to sell shares of our Common Stock in the secondary market.Information

AsOur ~~of February 6, 2013, we had 2,209,911 shares of~~ Common Stock ~~outstanding~~is ~~held~~approved byfor ~~approximately~~trading ~~195~~on ~~stockholders~~the ofOTCQB ~~record.~~under Onthe ~~October~~symbol 8,“MOAK”. ~~2012,~~Although the Company’s ~~authorized~~Common aStock 10is approved for 1trading, ~~reverse~~there ~~stock~~is ~~split~~no onestablished ~~its~~public ~~outstanding~~trading ~~shares~~market offor our Common Stock, ~~which~~as ~~became~~it ~~effective~~is quoted on ~~December~~a 6,very ~~2012.~~limited ~~All~~and ~~share~~sporadic ~~amounts~~basis, ~~have~~with ~~been~~the ~~retroactively~~most ~~restated~~recent totrade ~~reflect~~(382 ~~this~~shares ~~reverse~~traded) ~~stock~~occurring ~~split~~on October 22, 2012.

Our Common Stock is considered "penny stock" under the rules the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The SEC has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Penny stocks are generally equity securities with a price of less than $5.00, other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ Stock Market System, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or quotation system. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the Commission, that:

-	contains a description of the nature and level of risks in the market for penny stocks in both public offerings and secondary trading;

contains a description of the broker's or dealer's duties to the customer and of the rights and remedies available to the customer with respect to a violation to such duties or other requirements of Securities' laws; contains a brief, clear, narrative description of a dealer market, including bid and ask prices for penny stocks and the significance of the spread between the bid and ask price;

-	contains a toll-free telephone number for inquiries on disciplinary actions;

-	defines significant terms in the disclosure document or in the conduct of trading in penny stocks; and

-	contains such other information and is in such form, including language, type, size and format, as the Commission shall require by rule or regulation.

The broker-dealer also must provide, prior to effecting any transaction in a penny stock, the customer with:

-	bid and offer quotations for the penny stock;

-	the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction;

-	the number of shares to which such bid and ask prices apply, or other comparable information relating to the depth and liquidity of the marker for such stock; and

-	monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account.

In addition, the penny stock rules that require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules; the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written acknowledgement of the receipt of a risk disclosure statement, a written agreement to transactions involving penny stocks, and a signed and dated copy of a written suitably statement.

These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the trading activity in the secondary market for our stock.

Shareholders

As of March 26, 2014, we had 2,609,911 shares of Common Stock outstanding held by 195 stockholders of record, which does not include shareholders whose shares are held in street or nominee name. On October 8, 2012, the Company authorized a 10 for 1 reverse stock split on its outstanding shares of common stock, which became effective on December 6, 2012. All share amounts have been retroactively restated to reflect this reverse stock split.

Dividends and Distributions

We have not declared or paid any cash dividends on our Common Stock during the year ended December 31, ~~2012~~2013, or in any prior period. There are no restrictions on the Common Stock that limit our ability to pay dividends if declared by the Board of Directors. The holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive dividends when and if declared by the Board of Directors, out of funds legally available therefore and to share pro-rata in any distribution to the stockholders. Generally, the Company is not able to pay dividends if, after payment of the dividends, it would be unable to pay its liabilities as they become due or if the value of the Company’s assets, after payment of the liabilities, is less than the aggregate of the Company’s liabilities and stated capital of all classes. We do not anticipate paying cash dividends in the immediate future.

~~Equity Compensation Plans~~6

We entered into restricted stock agreements with two individuals on November 21, 2012. Shares were granted on November 21, 2012, as consideration for services to be rendered with a vesting and forfeiture schedule for retention purposes. Of the total 1,600,000 shares of Common Stock collectively granted pursuant to the restricted stock agreements, 50% of such shares vested and were issued to the two individuals upon their employment with the Company as executives on January 1, 2013. Thereafter, subject to continued executive employment, an additional 25% of the total shares vest on January 1, 2014, and the final 25% vest on January 1, 2015.

Table of Contents

Equity Compensation Plans

We entered into restricted stock agreements with two individuals on November 21, 2012. Shares were granted on November 21, 2012, as consideration for services to be rendered with a vesting and forfeiture schedule for retention purposes. Of the total 1,600,000 shares of Common Stock collectively granted pursuant to the restricted stock agreements, 50% of such shares vested and were issued to the two individuals upon their employment with the Company as executives on January 1, 2013; 25% of such shares vested and were issued to the two individuals on January 1, 2014; and the remaining 25% of the total shares vest subject to continued executive employment on January 1, 2015.

Due to the resignation of one of the executives on February 2, 2014, 275,000 of the remaining unvested shares were forfeited, thus only 125,000 additional shares will vest on January 1, 2015, subject to continued employment of the remaining executive.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

Plan category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
	(a)	(b)	(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	0	0	0
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	1,600,000	$0.00	0
Total	1,600,000	$0.00	0

Equity compensation plan information as of December 31, 2013, is set forth below.

Plan category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
	(a)	(b)	(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	0	$0.00	0
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	800,000	$0.00	0
Total	800,000	$0.00	0

Recent Issuance Involving Unregistered Securities

OnExcept ~~January~~for 8,the ~~2013,~~matters wepreviously ~~issued~~disclosed ~~250,450 shares of our Common Stock to a related party,~~ in aCurrent ~~private~~Reports ~~transaction,~~on toForm ~~settle~~8-K ~~in full our payable to~~ that ~~related~~we ~~party,~~have ~~which was $125~~filed,~~225~~ aswe ofhave ~~December~~not ~~31,~~sold ~~2012~~any ~~and~~of ~~January~~our 8,equity ~~2013,~~securities during the ~~date~~period ofcovered ~~settlement~~by ofthis ~~the~~Report ~~payable.~~that ~~These shares~~ were ~~issued~~not registered under ~~an exemption from registration contained in Section 4(2) of~~ the Securities Act of 1933. We believe the registration exemption is available for this transaction because the offer and sale was made solely and only to the party to the transaction described herein following comprehensive due diligence investigations and without any public offering or solicitation.

Repurchase of Equity Securities

None.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item.

Table of Contents

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

The following is a discussion of the financial condition and results of operations of Med One Oak, Inc. ~~(formerly BidGive International, Inc.)~~ for the years ended December 31, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011~~2012. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

Safe Harbor Statement

The following "Safe Harbor" Statement is made pursuant to the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Certain of the statements contained in the body of this Annual Report are forward-looking statements (rather than historical facts) that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. With respect to such forward-looking statements, we seek the protections afforded by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

Words such as “plan,” “intend,” “will,” “hope,” “seek,” “anticipate,” “expect”, “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “may,” and similar terms and phrases, used in this Annual Report and our incorporated documents, often identify such forward looking statements, but are not the only indication that a statement is a forward looking statement. These forward-looking statements are made based on expectations and beliefs concerning future events affecting us and are subject to uncertainties and factors relating to our operations and business environment, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those matters expressed in or implied by these forward-looking statements. The following factors are among those that may cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements:

Table of Contents

relating to our operations and business environment, all of which are difficult to predict and many of which are beyond our control, that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those matters expressed in or implied by these forward-looking statements. The following factors are among those that may cause actual results to differ materially from our forward-looking statements:

·	general economic and industry conditions;

·	our history of losses, deficits, and negative operating cash flows;

·	our limited operating history;

·	lack of operating cash flow;

·	lack of operations;

·	competition;

·	reliance on, and the ability to attract, key personnel; and

·	availability of debt or equity financing for acquisitions.

This list is intended to identify certain of the principal factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements included elsewhere herein but is not a comprehensive list of all of such factors.

Overview

WeOn ~~have~~March ~~had~~31, ~~limited~~2011, we sold our then-existing operations ~~since~~and ~~March~~became ~~31,~~a ~~2011~~shell company. ~~Such~~On ~~operations~~January ~~consist~~1, of2013, awe ~~search~~hired ~~for~~Executives, anwho ~~appropriate~~provided ~~transaction~~operational ~~such~~and asfinancial aconsulting ~~merger~~services to healthcare companies located in and around Houston, ~~acquisition~~Texas, ~~reverse~~while ~~merger~~also orworking ~~other~~towards ~~business~~identifying ~~combination~~and ~~with~~effecting anone ~~operating~~or ~~business~~more transactions to acquire assets and/or ~~other~~operations ~~appropriate~~in ~~financial~~the ~~transaction~~healthcare industry.

~~Our~~We ~~operations~~hired ~~consist~~additional ofexecutives ~~working~~and ~~towards~~other ~~effecting~~experienced ~~one~~professionals orbeginning ~~more~~on ~~transactions~~October to1, ~~acquire~~2013. orDuring ~~purchase~~March as2014, ofwe ~~yet~~signed ~~unidentified~~a ~~assets~~formal ~~and~~management ~~operations~~services inagreement ~~the~~with ~~healthcare~~a ~~industry.~~hospital ~~There~~located ~~can~~in beThe noWoodlands, ~~assurance~~Texas, ~~that~~under ~~this~~which ~~plan~~we will beprovide ~~successfully~~certain ~~implemented.~~management ~~Until~~services abased ~~transaction~~on fixed ishourly ~~effectuated,~~rates. weWe doalso ~~not~~hired ~~expect~~additional toemployees ~~have~~who ~~significant~~will ~~operations.~~provide ~~However, any~~ such ~~acquisition~~services oralong ~~purchase~~with ~~may~~our ~~involve:~~current employees.

Table of Contents

If we are able to identify and successfully effective an acquisition, any such acquisition may involve:

·	a material change in the Company’s present capitalization;

·	a material change in the composition of the Company’s board of directors;

·	the issuance of a significant amount of the Company’s securities; and

· the acquisition of significant assets and commencement of ~~business~~a ~~operations~~new operating segment.

ItThere ismay ~~anticipated~~also ~~that~~be ~~opportunities~~various ~~may~~risks ~~come~~inherent toin ~~our~~any ~~attention~~acquisition ~~from~~we ~~various~~might ~~sources,~~be ~~including~~able ~~our~~to ~~management~~effectuate, ~~stockholders, professional advisors, members of~~ the ~~financial~~nature ~~community,~~ and ~~others~~magnitude ~~who~~of ~~may~~which ~~present~~cannot ~~unsolicited~~be ~~proposals~~predicted. AtWe ~~this~~may ~~time,~~also webe ~~have~~subject ~~no plans, understandings, agreements, or commitments with any individual or entity in regard~~ to ~~any~~increased ~~business~~governmental ~~opportunities.~~regulation Infollowing ~~evaluating~~ a transaction; however, weit ~~analyze~~is ~~all~~not ~~available~~possible ~~factors~~at ~~and~~this ~~make~~time ato ~~determination~~predict ~~based~~the onnature aor ~~composite~~magnitude of ~~available~~such ~~facts~~increased regulation, ~~without~~if ~~reliance on~~ any ~~single factor~~.

We expect to continue to incur moderate losses each quarter until a transaction considered appropriate by management is effectuated or until our management services business grows to a level that will sustain our ongoing operations. OnIn ~~January~~order 1,to ~~2013~~fund operations during this time, we issued a ~~Promissory~~note ~~Note~~on January 1, 2013, to a related party (“Note”), under which we have the right to draw up to $1,500,000 for working capital purposes, with any such debt to be repaid in cash or shares of our Common Stock, at the mutual agreement of the parties. ~~Growth~~As of December 31 2013, the outstanding balance on the note was $456,752, which is payable in full on January 31, 2015, and approximately $1,043,000 remained available for future working capital needs. We believe growth of operations and/or acquisition of business or assets will ~~likely~~ be dependent upon our ability to issue additional debt and/or equity ~~securities~~ in ~~exchange for additional capital or in~~ conjunction with a merger or acquisition transaction.

~~The~~ Results ~~Company’s operations following its consummation~~ of aOperations ~~transaction~~- ~~will~~Year beEnded ~~dependent~~December ~~on the nature of the transaction. There may also be various risks inherent in the transaction~~31, ~~the~~2013 ~~nature~~Compared ~~and magnitude of which cannot be predicted. The Company may also be subject~~ to ~~increased~~Fiscal ~~governmental~~Year ~~regulation~~Ended ~~following~~December ~~a transaction; however~~31, ~~it is not possible at this time to predict the nature or magnitude of such increased regulation, if any.~~2012

7Revenues

~~Table~~Total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2013, were $795,161, including revenues of ~~Contents~~$546,217 from a related party. Revenues for the year ended December 31, 2012, were $0.

~~Results~~Direct cost of ~~Operations - Year Ended December 31, 2012 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2011~~revenues

~~Sales~~Total ~~Revenues~~direct cost of revenues for the year ended December 31, 2013, was $772,000, including direct cost of $530,306 for services provided to a related party. Direct cost of revenues was $0 for the year ended December 31, 2012.

~~Consolidated~~Operating ~~revenues for the year ended December 31, 2011 were $1,875. On March 31, 2011, we sold our operations and became a shell company with limited operations and earn no revenues.~~expenses

~~Operating~~General ~~Expenses~~and administrative expenses increased $75,858 (46.3%) to $239,557 for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to $163,699 for the year ended December 31, 2012. The overall increase is primarily due increases in: salaries and benefits of $58,574, acquisition costs of $25,917, director and officer insurance of $10,000, and rent of $6,750; partially offset by decreases in stock based compensation of $16,000, professional fees of $8,649, and other general and administrative expenses of $734. This overall net increase in general and administrative expenses was due to our increased efforts to become an operating entity.

Total operating expenses decreased $164,585, or 50.1%, to $163,699 for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to $328,284 for the year ended December 31, 2011. This overall decrease is primarily due to a decrease in stock based compensation of $268,000, partially offset by an increase in salaries and benefits of $69,515 and other general and administrative expenses of $33,900, primarily consisting of higher legal and accounting fees incurred in connection with our increased efforts to become an operating entity.

Other Income (Expense)

Other ~~income~~expenses ~~(expense), net,~~ was $~~0 and $124~~5,~~310~~627 for the ~~years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively. For the~~ year ended December 31, ~~2011~~2013, ~~other~~and ~~income (expense)~~ included: a$964 ~~gain~~of oninterest ~~debt~~paid ~~extinguishment~~in ~~and~~connection with a ~~gain~~short onterm ~~sales~~note ofpayable ~~assets~~for ofinsurance ~~$112,949~~premiums and $174,~~577,~~663 ~~respectively,~~accrued ~~related~~interest pursuant to the ~~March~~promissory ~~31,~~note ~~2011~~issued ~~sale~~to ofa ~~our~~related ~~operations, partially offset by interest expense of $6,216~~party. We did not recognize any other income (expense) for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Net Loss

Our net losses for the years ended December 31, ~~2012~~2013, and December 31, ~~2011~~2012, were $~~163~~222,~~699~~023 and $~~203~~163,~~249~~699, respectively. The ~~decrease~~increase in net loss was directly attributable to ~~the~~higher ~~net decrease in~~ operating expenses, net, partially offset by ~~higher~~increased ~~other income~~revenues, ~~net,~~ discussed above.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

~~For~~Our ~~the~~primary ~~years~~cash ~~ended~~requirement ~~December~~is ~~31,~~paying ~~2012~~our operating expenses and ~~2011,~~servicing our ~~consolidated~~debt. ~~balance~~Our ~~sheet~~primary ~~reflects~~cash ~~current~~source ~~and~~is ~~total~~from ~~assets~~consulting ofservices $0 and ~~total~~advances ~~current~~on ~~liabilities~~the ofNote ~~$125~~to a related party,~~235~~ and ~~$4,750~~our atprimary ~~December~~use ~~31,~~of ~~2012~~cash ~~and~~is ~~2011,~~to ~~respectively~~fund operations. At ~~both~~ December 31, ~~2012 and 2011~~2013, ~~our~~ cash ~~balance~~on hand was $084, and we had a working capital ~~deficit~~ of $~~125~~250,~~235 and $4~~719,~~750~~ atcompared ~~December~~to ~~31,~~cash ~~2012~~on ~~and~~hand ~~2011,~~of ~~respectively.~~$0 ~~Our~~and negative working capital ~~deficit at December 31, 2012 primarily consisted~~ of a $125,~~225~~235 ~~payable~~at toDecember a31, ~~related party~~2012. OnAt ~~January~~December 831, 2013, weour ~~issued~~accounts ~~250,450~~receivable ~~shares~~totaled of$271,473, ~~Common~~which ~~Stock~~was tocollected ~~this~~in ~~related party for~~ full ~~settlement~~during ofFebruary ~~this payable~~2014. ~~At December 31, 2012 we had no material commitments for capital expenditures.~~

During the year ended December 31, 2012, cash used in operations totaled $11,214 versus cash provided by operations of $8,740 in the year ended December 31, 2011. Cash provided by investing activities was $0 for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to $17,577 for the year ended December 31, 2011, consisting of proceeds from the sale of assets. During the year ended December 31, 2012, cash provided by financing activities consisted of a $11,214 contribution from a related party, compared to cash used in financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2011 of $26,932, for repayment of a loan payable and loans from shareholder.9

Our operations currently consist of working towards effecting one or more transactions to acquire or purchase assets and/or operations in the healthcare industry. We expect to continue to incur moderate losses each quarter until a transaction considered appropriate by management is effectuated. On January 1, 2013, we entered into a Promissory Note with a related party whereby we have the ability to draw up to $1,500,000 during the period from January 1, 2013 through September 30, 2013 to pay ongoing operating expenses. The Promissory Note can be settled in either cash or shares of Common Stock at maturity, for the outstanding principle amount and accrued interest, at the mutual agreement of the parties. If settled in shares, the number of shares issued will be based upon the fair value of our Common Stock at the time of settlement. We believe that the $1,500,000 available under this Promissory Note is sufficient to sustain our current level of operations for the next 12 months. However, growth of operations or acquisition of business or assets will likely be dependent upon our ability to issue additional debt and/or equity securities in exchange for additional capital or in conjunction with a merger or acquisition transaction. At this time, we have no plans, understandings, agreements, or commitments with any individual or entity in regard to any business opportunities.

Table of Contents

~~Off-Balance~~During ~~Sheet~~the ~~Arrangements~~year ended December 31, 2013, we used net cash in operations of $38,306 versus net cash used in operations of $11,214 in the prior year. During the year ended December 31, 2013, net cash provided by financing activities totaled $38,390 and consisted of proceeds from a Note issued to a related party, compared to cash provided by financing activities of $11,214 in the prior year, consisting of a contribution from a related party. During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, we had no investing activities.

WeFuture do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.Needs

Our operations currently consist of providing management consulting services while working towards effecting one or more transactions to acquire or purchase assets and/or operations in the healthcare industry. At December 31, 2013, we had no material commitments for capital expenditures. We expect to continue to incur moderate losses each quarter until a transaction considered appropriate by management is effectuated and our operations grow to a level that fully supports our operating expenses. We funded cash shortfalls during 2013 with advances on a Note we issued to a related party on January 1, 2013, whereby we have the ability to draw up to $1,500,000 for working capital purposes. At December 31, 2013, the outstanding balance on the Note was $456,752 and is payable in full on January 31, 2015. The Note can be settled in either cash or shares of Common Stock at maturity, for the outstanding principle amount and accrued interest, at the mutual agreement of the parties. We believe that the approximate $1,043,000 available under this Note is sufficient to sustain our current level of operations for the next 12 months. However, growth of operations or acquisition of business or assets will likely be dependent upon our ability to raise additional capital through the issuance of additional debt and/or equity securities, of which our ability to do so on favorable terms is uncertain. At this time, we have no plans, understandings, agreements, or commitments with any individual or entity in regard to any business opportunities.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

In preparing our ~~consolidated~~ financial statements, we make estimates, assumptions and judgments that can affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the ~~consolidated~~ financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue, operating income (loss) and net income (loss) during the period. The application of our critical accounting policies requires an evaluation of a number of complex criteria and significant accounting judgments by us. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities. Management has discussed the development, selection and disclosure of these estimates with our Board of Directors. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

An accounting policy is deemed to be critical if it requires an accounting estimate to be made based on assumptions about matters that are highly uncertain at the time the estimate is made and/or if different estimates that reasonably could have been used or changes in the accounting estimates that are reasonably likely to occur periodically could materially impact the consolidated financial statements. Management believes the following critical accounting policy reflects our more significant estimate and assumption used in the preparation of the ~~consolidated~~ financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

Time-and-expense billing arrangements require the client to pay based on the number of hours worked by our revenue-generating professionals at contractually agreed-upon rates. We recognize revenues for our professional services rendered under time-and-expense engagements based on the hours incurred at agreed-upon rates as work is performed.

Table of Contents

In fixed-fee billing arrangements, we agree to a pre-established fee in exchange for a pre-determined set of professional services. Generally, the client agrees to pay a fixed-fee every month over the specified contract term. These contracts are for varying periods and generally permit the client to cancel the contract before the end of the term. We recognize revenues for our professional services rendered under these fixed-fee billing arrangements monthly over the specified contract term or, in certain cases, revenue is recognized on the proportional performance method of accounting based on the ratio of labor hours incurred to estimated total labor hours, which we consider to be the best available indicator of the pattern and timing in which such contract obligations are fulfilled.

In performance-based or contingent billing arrangements, fees are tied to the attainment of contractually defined objectives. Often this type of arrangement supplements a time-and-expense or fixed-fee engagement, where payment of a performance-based fee is deferred until the conclusion of the matter or upon the achievement of performance-based criteria. We do not recognize revenues under performance-based billing arrangements until all related performance criteria are met and collection of the fee is reasonably assured.

Provisions are recorded for the estimated realization adjustments on all engagements. Reimbursable expenses, including those relating to travel, out-of pocket expenses, and other similar costs, are generally included in revenues, and an equivalent amount of reimbursable expenses is included in direct costs of revenues in the period in which the expense is incurred.

Differences between the timing of billings and the recognition of revenue are recognized as either unbilled services or deferred revenues in the Balance Sheet. We hold retainers on deposit until we have completed the work. We generally apply these retainers to final billings and refund any excess over the final amount billed to clients, as appropriate, when we complete our work.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Unbilled Services

We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts and for services performed but not yet billed based on several factors, including the estimated cash realization from amounts due from clients, an assessment of a client’s ability to make required payments, and the historical percentages of fee adjustments and write-offs. The allowances are assessed by management on a regular basis.

We record the provision for doubtful accounts and unbilled services as a reduction in revenue to the extent the provision relates to fee adjustments and other discretionary pricing adjustments. To the extent the provision relates to a client’s inability to make required payments on accounts receivables, we record the provision in selling, general and administrative expenses.

Stock-Based Compensation

We account for all stock-based compensation arrangements using a fair value method and record such expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, which approximates the respective service periods to which they are earned.

Valuation of Net Deferred Tax Assets

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined using the asset and liability method in accordance with the guidance on income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are established for future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are offset by valuation allowances when we believe it is more likely than not that such net deferred tax assets will not be realized. We recognize the impact of an uncertain tax position only if that position is more likely than not of being sustained upon examination by the taxing authority based on its technical merits.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

We have implemented all accounting pronouncements that are in effect that may impact our consolidated financial statements and do not believe that there are any other accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have not entered into any off-balance sheet arrangements.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTAL DATA.

See “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements of Med One Oak, Inc.” included on page F-1 for information required under this Item 8.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURES.

~~We changed our independent registered public accounting firm effective January 10, 2013 from Peter Messineo, CPA (“Messineo”) to Pannell Kerr Forster of Texas, P~~None.C. (“PKF”), Certified Public Accountants, a Professional Corporation. Information regarding the change in the independent registered public accounting firm was disclosed in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on January 29, 2013. There were no disagreements with Messineo or any reportable events requiring disclosure under Item 304(b) of Regulation S-K.

Table of Contents

During the Company's two most recent fiscal years, and any subsequent interim period prior to engaging PKF, neither the Company (or someone on its behalf) consulted with PKF on either the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, either completed or proposed; or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Company's financial statements, and no written report was provided to the Company or oral advice was provided that PKF concluded was an important factor considered by the Company in reaching a decision as to accounting, auditing or financial reporting; or any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement (as defined in paragraph (a)(1)(iv) and the related instructions to Item 304(a)(2) of Regulation S-K) or a reportable event (as described in paragraph (a)(1)(v) to Item 304(a)(2) of Regulation S-K).

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) in effect as of December 31, ~~2012~~2013 was carried out under the supervision and with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer. Based upon that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of December 31, ~~2012~~2013, the design and operation of our controls and procedures were effective in timely alerting management to the material information relating to the Company required to be included in its periodic filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. It should be noted, however, that because of inherent limitations, any system of internal controls, however well-designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that financial reporting objectives will be met. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2012~~2013, based on the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organization of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Based on that evaluation under the COSO criteria, our management concluded that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2012~~2013.

No Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting Firm

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to an exemption for smaller reporting companies under Section 989G of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd-Frank”). Dodd-Frank provides an exemption from the independent auditor attestation requirement under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for small issuers that are neither a large accelerated filer nor an accelerated filer. The Company qualifies for this exemption.

~~Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting~~12

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation referred to above during the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation referred to above during the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2013, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Inherent Limitations Over Internal Controls

Internal control over financial reporting cannot provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives because of its inherent limitations, including the possibility of human error and circumvention by collusion or overriding of controls. Accordingly, even an effective internal control system may not prevent or detect material misstatements on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

1113

Table of Contents

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

Our directors and officers, as of ~~February~~March 626, ~~2013~~2014, are set forth below. The directors hold office for their respective term and until their successors are duly elected and qualified. The officers are elected annually by the Board of Directors (“Board”).

Name	Age	Position	Since
Ivan Wood, Jr.	65	Director, Chief Executive Officer and President	2013
David P. Ellent, M.D.	38	Chairman of the Board and Executive Vice-President	2012
Pamela J. Roth	48	Chief Financial Officer	2013
Chase Chandler	33	Chief Executive Officer	2014
David P. Ellent, M.D.	37	Chairman of the Board and Vice-President	2012
Pamela J. Roth	49	Chief Financial Officer	2013
Brandon Creighton	42	Director	2012
Cynthia M. West	35	Chief Operating Officer	2014
Joel Kerschenbaum, M.D.	63	Director	2012
Brandon Creighton	43	Director	2012
John V. Peet, M.D.	68	Director	2012
Joel Kerschenbaum, M.D.	64	Director	2012
Thomas (Tom) J. Pisula	48	Director	2013
John V. Peet, M.D.	69	Director	2012
Thomas (Tom) J. Pisula	49	Director	2013

Ivan Wood, Jr. was elected as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President on January 1, 2013, when he was also elected to the Board. Wood was a partner in the law firm of Strasburger & Price, LLP from 2000 until January 1, 2013, when he became Of Counsel to the firm. Since 1976, Wood has practiced general corporate law, with particular emphasis on clients in the healthcare industry, including hospitals, ambulatory care facilities, home care providers, and physicians. Wood holds a J.D. from the University of Texas School of Law, as well as a B. B.A. from the University of Texas. A description of Wood’s employment agreement is set forth in Item 11 of this Annual Report.

Pamela J. Roth joined the Company as its Chief Financial Officer on January 1, 2013. Prior to joining the Company and since 2010, Roth worked at Albeck, a private accounting and consulting organization, as a consulting partner. From 2005 until 2010, Roth was an audit partner with BDO USA, LLP. From 1987 until 2005, Roth held multiple positions with Ernst & Young, leaving as a senior manager, and also served as Associate Director of Financial Reporting for American General Corporation and as Assistant Controller for Transamerica Fund Management Company. Roth is a Texas licensed Certified Public Accountant and is an active member of the American Institute of CPAs and the Texas Society of Certified Public Accountants. She is a graduate of Texas A&M University and has served as a member of the Texas A&M University Accounting Advisory Council since 2006. A description of Roth’s employment agreement is set forth in Item 11 of this Annual Report.

David P. Ellent, M.D. became the Company’s Vice-President on January 1, 2013, and on December 31, 2012 was also elected to the Board as its Chair. Ellent is a Medical Oncology Physician with Greater Houston Physician’s Medical Association (GHPMA). Ellent is Board Certified in Internal Medicine and Medical Oncology and has worked with GHPMA/Greater Houston Cancer Clinic since 2007. Ellent’s education includes a B.A. in Biology from Rutgers University (1996); earning his Medical Degree from New Jersey Medical School (2000); completing an Internal Medicine residency program at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (2003) and a Hematology and Medical Oncology Fellowship at the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (2007). Ellent has participated in Hematology / Oncology related research programs and has been credited with multiple publications throughout his career.

Chase Chandler was appointed as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President on February 3, 2014. Mr. Chandler is currently a partner at the law firm of Brunson Chandler & Jones, PLLC where he has was worked since May 2013, focusing on securities and corporate law. Prior to this, Mr. Chandler worked as an associate attorney at the law firm of Vincent & Rees from May 2007 until May 2013, where he focused on securities and corporate law. Mr. Chandler graduated from the University of Utah, cum laude, with a B.S. degree in Finance and from the University of Utah S.J. Quinney College of Law. Mr. Chandler is licensed to practice law in the State of Utah where he is a member of the Utah State Bar.

Pamela J. Roth joined the Company as its Chief Financial Officer on January 1, 2013. Prior to joining the Company and since 2010, Roth worked at Albeck, a private accounting and consulting organization, as a consulting partner. From 2005 until 2010, Roth was an audit partner with BDO USA, LLP. From 1987 until 2005, Roth held multiple positions with Ernst & Young, LLP, leaving as a senior manager, and also served as Associate Director of Financial Reporting for American General Corporation and as Assistant Controller for Transamerica Fund Management Company. Roth is a Texas licensed Certified Public Accountant and is an active member of the American Institute of CPAs and the Texas Society of Certified Public Accountants. She is a graduate of Texas A&M University and has served as a member of the Texas A&M University Accounting Advisory Council since 2006. A description of Roth’s employment agreement is set forth in Item 11 of this Annual Report.

Cynthia M. West joined the Company as its Corporate Secretary on January 1, 2013 and was named Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, and Corporate Secretary on February 3, 2014. Prior to joining the Company and since 2009, West was Chief Operating Officer of Greater Houston Physician Medical Association (“GHPMA”). Prior to 2009, West was the ancillary director for Houston Physicians Medical Association. West earned a B.S. in Nuclear Medicine Technology from the University of Central Arkansas. West does not have a written employment agreement with the Company.

Brandon Creighton was elected to the Board effective December 31, 2012. Creighton is a Republican member of the Texas House of Representatives, representing District 16 since 2006. Creighton holds a J.D. from Oklahoma City University Law School as well as a B.A. in Government from the University of Texas, Austin. Creighton’s employment before 2006 includes positions with the Texas Senate, Texas Attorney General, Oklahoma Attorney General and private legal practice and land development. He is involved in a multiple community involvement projects, legislative roles and has received a multitude of recognitions, honors and services awards.

1214

Table of Contents

Joel Kerschenbaum, M.D. was elected to the Company’s board of directors effective December 31, 2012. Kerschenbaum is full-time Family Medicine Physician that has practiced in The Woodlands / Conroe, Texas area since 1980. Prior to joining Greater Houston Physicians Medical Association (GHPMA) in 2010, Kerschenbaum was a part of Sadler Clinic (1980 – March, 2010) and maintained a private practice in Kitchener, Ontario, Canada (1974-1980). He earned his Medical Degree from University of Toronto in 1974 and completed residency / internship at St. Michael Hospital in Toronto, Ontario. Kerschenbaum is a member of the Texas Medical Association, American Academy of Family Practice, and Montgomery County Medical Society (President 1988, Board of Directors 1989). At Sadler Clinic, Kerschenbaum held multiple positions, some of which include Board of Directors (1993-2000 and 2005-2009); Chairman of Governance committee (2005); Joint Policy Board (1992-2000); Vice-chairman Joint Policy Board (1992-1998); Chairman of Operations committee (1996-1998); Chairman of the Board of Directors (1998-2000). Additional professional experience includes Board of Directors, North Montgomery County Physician’s Association (1993-1999); Founder of the Community Clinic – a not for profit clinic formed to provide free dental, medical and social services to the working poor of Montgomery and Harris counties; Medical Director of the Community Clinic (1996 – 2010); Member of the Board of Directors of the South County Community Clinic (1996 – 2010); Chairman of the Board of Directors for the South County Community Clinic (1996 – 2001); Interfaith of the Woodlands – Board of Directors (January 2012 to present); Interfaith Community Clinic – Board of Directors (January 2012 to present); Interfaith Community Clinic Advisory Board (January 2010 to present).

John V. Peet, M.D. was elected to the Company’s board of directors effective December 31, 2012. Peet is a full-time Family Practice Physician in Conroe, Texas. Prior to joining Greater Houston Physician’s Medical Association (GHPMA) in 2010, and since 1973, Peet was part of Sadler Clinic, where he maintained a full-time medical practice. From 1990-2000, Peet served as Sadler’s Chief of Staff, Chairman of the Board, and Medical Director. He earned his medical degree from Southwestern Medical School (1966-1970), his undergraduate major of Chemical Engineering at University of Texas (1966); and while serving in the United States Air Force completed the Internship – Straight Surgery (1970-1971) program and Flight Surgeon Survival Training (1971-1973). Peet has also held multiple professional leadership positions and served in community service roles over the years, some of which include Chief of Staff – Doctor’s Hospital, Conroe (1977, 1981, 1982); Past President of Montgomery County Medical Society; Program Medical Director for Healthsouth, Woodlands (2004-Present); Chief of Staff Healthsouth, Woodlands (2008-Present).

Thomas (Tom) J. Pisula was elected to the Company’s board of directors on February 6, 2013. Pisula is President and CEO of Pinecroft Realty. Since Pinecroft’s inception in 2006, Pisula has maintained overall responsibility for all of its projects. Under Pisula’s guidance, Pinecroft debuted the first LEED office building in the Greater Northwest/Houston area, certified at the Silver level from the U.S. Green Building Counsel. Prior to 2006, Pisula worked in the energy business, specifically with natural gas commodities. Pisula supports many charitable organizations, including the American Heart Association.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among any of the Directors, nominees or executive officers.

Legal Proceedings

As of the date of this Annual Report, there are no material proceedings to which our directors or officers are a party adverse to us.

Advisory Board

OnNine ~~December~~physicians ~~31,~~have ~~2012,~~been we appointed ~~nine physicians~~ to serve on our Advisory Board. The purpose of our Advisory Board is to provide advice and consultation on clinical matters.

Table of Contents

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our ~~directors and~~ executive officers, and directors and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities, to file with the SEC ~~reports~~initial statements of beneficial ownership, ~~and~~reports of changes in ownership and annual reports concerning their ownership of our ~~Common~~common ~~Stock~~stock and other equity securities, on Form 3, 4 and 5, respectively. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% ~~stockholders~~shareholders are required by the SEC ~~regulation~~regulations to furnish usour company with copies of all Section 16(a) ~~forms~~reports they file. Based on the review of copies of such reports furnished to us and written representations that no other reports were required, we believe that, during the 2012 fiscal year, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to our executive officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners were complied with, other than as follows: Ivan Wood Jr., Pamela J. Roth, Dr. David Ellent, Brandon Creighton, Dr. John Peet, and Dr. Joel Kerschenbaum, each did not timely file one Form 3.

Table of Contents

Based solely on our review of the copies of such reports received by us and on written representations by our officers and directors regarding their compliance with the applicable reporting requirements under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, we believe that, with respect to the year ended December 31, 2013, our officers and directors, and all of the persons known to us to own more than 10% of our common stock, filed all required reports on a timely basis.

Code of Ethics

The Company has not yet adopted a corporate code of ethics because it does not ~~effect~~affect ongoing business operations. The Board is planning to establish a code of ethics to deter wrongdoing and promote honest and ethical conduct in its field of operations; ensure full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in public reports; comply with applicable laws; ensure prompt internal reporting of code violations; and provide accountability for adherence to the code. The Company plans to implement a code of ethics ~~during~~in ~~2013~~the future.

Corporate Governance

The Company does not have standing audit, nominating or compensation committees of the Board or committees performing similar functions because it does not ~~effect~~affect ongoing business operations. All such applicable functions have been performed by the Board as a whole. The Company anticipates establishing such committees in the future. ~~The~~Because ~~Company~~we ~~currently~~are ~~does~~still ~~not~~a ~~currently~~developing ~~have~~company, anour ~~audit~~Board ~~committee~~is ~~financial~~still ~~expert~~in ~~serving~~the onprocess ~~its~~of ~~Board,~~finding ~~but anticipates adding~~ an “audit committee financial expert” inas ~~conjunction~~defined ~~with establishing an audit committee~~ in ~~the~~Regulation ~~near future~~S-K.

~~During~~Meetings ~~the~~of ~~year~~Our ~~ended December 31, 2012, the~~ Board ~~held~~of ~~no formal meetings, but took action twice by unanimous written consent.~~Directors

During the year ended December 31, 2013, our Board held three (3) meetings and took action four (4) times by unanimous written consent.

Director Compensation

We did not compensate our directors for board services for the year 2013. However, in the future, we intend to implement a market-based director compensation program.

Limitations on Liability

Article 8 of our Bylaws provides that we shall, to the fullest extent permitted by Section 145 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, indemnity any director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, against expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines, amounts paid in settlement and/or other matters referred to in or covered by that Section, by reason of the fact that such person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise.

Our obligation to provide indemnification under Article eight shall be offset to the extent the indemnified party is indemnified by any other source including, but not limited to, any applicable insurance coverage under a policy maintained by the corporation, the indemnified party or any other person.

Indemnification against Public Policy

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling an issuer pursuant to the foregoing provisions, the opinion of the Commission is that such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act of 1933 and is therefore unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than director, officer or controlling person in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, we will, unless in the opinion of our counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by us is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

Table of Contents

The effect of indemnification may be to limit our rights and our shareholders (through shareholders’ derivative suits on behalf of Med One) to recover monetary damages and expenses against a director for breach of fiduciary duty.

Shareholder Communications

Currently, we do not have a policy with regard to the consideration of any director candidates recommended by security holders. To date, no security holders have made any such recommendations.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table sets forth information regarding compensation paid to our executive officers for services rendered in all capacities to the Company for the years ended December 31, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011. Other than indicated below, no compensation was awarded or paid by us to, or earned by, any officer or director as our employee during the fiscal year ended December 31,~~ 2012. We currently have no stock option, retirement, pension, profit-sharing programs or similar plans for the benefit of our directors, officer, or other employees. ~~We will pay employment compensation, including salary, bonuses, restricted stock awards, and benefits to our officers commencing in 2013, as further discussed below.~~

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary		Bonus		Stock Awards		Option Awards		Other		Total
Dr. Asit Choksi (1)	2012	$	42,300	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	42,300
Ivan Wood, Jr. (1)
Chief Executive Officer and Director	2013	$	500,000	$	-	$	22,000	$	-	$	-	$	522,000
Pamela J. Roth
Chief Financial Officer	2013		290,000		25,000		10,000		-		-		325,000
Dr. Asit Choksi (2)	2012		42,300		-		-		-		-		42,300
Chairman of the Board
Chief Executive Officer, President
Secretary, and Treasurer
David M. Rees (2)	2012	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
David M. Rees (3)	2012		-		-		-		-		-		-
Former Chief Executive Officer	~~2011~~	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-

(1)	Ivan Wood, Jr. served the Company as Chief Executive Officer during the period from January 1, 2013, through February 2, 2014.
(2)	Dr. Asit Choksi served the Company as Chief Executive Officer during the period from April 10, 2012, through December 31, 2012. During that period, he also served the Company as Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer.
(3)	David M. Rees served the Company as Chief Executive Officer during 2011 and until April 10, 2012. During that period, he also served the Company as Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer.

Employment Agreements

We entered into two employment agreements (the “Executive Employment Agreements”) as of November 21, 2012, with Ivan Wood, Jr., who served as our Chief Executive Officer and a director from January 1, 2013, through February, 2, 2014, when he resigned, and Pamela J. Roth, who is currently our Chief Financial Officer (Wood and Roth collectively the “Executives”). The Executive Employment Agreements established the duties and compensation of the Executives and provided for their continued employment with us. The following information reflects the material terms of each of the Executive Employment Agreements (as defined in the respective Executive Employment Agreements).

Term. The Executive Employment Agreements provide for an initial term of one (1) year with renewal on each anniversary thereafter for an additional one-year term unless there is an affirmative decision not to renew the contract by us or by the Executive.

Base Salary and Benefits. The Executive Employment Agreements provide Wood and Roth with annual base salaries of $500,000 and $290,000, respectively, for the first calendar year or portion thereof. In each subsequent calendar year during the term of the agreements, we shall pay to each Executive an annual base salary determined by the Board of Directors following its annual salary performance review. Beginning January 1, 2014, Roth’s annual base salary was increased from $290,000 to $315,000. During the term of employment of each Executive hereunder, each Executive shall participate in all employee benefit plans sponsored by us for our executive employees, including but not limited to sick leave and disability leave, Executive and Executive’s dependents under our health insurance plan and dental insurance and pension and/or profit sharing plans; provided, the nature, amount and limitations of such plans shall be determined from time to time by the Board of Directors. The agreements also provide for Executive’s participation in any and all retirement and employee benefit plans maintained by us on behalf of our employees, as well as fringe benefits normally associated with Executive’s position with us or made available to all other employees.

Table of Contents

(1)	Dr. Asit Choksi served the Company as Chief Executive Officer during the period from April 10, 2012 through December 31, 2012. During that period he also served the Company as Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer.
(2)	David M. Rees served the Company as Chief Executive Officer during 2011 and until April 10, 2012. During that period he also served the Company as Chief Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer.

Restricted Stock. In connection with each Executive Employment Agreement, on November 21, 2012, the Company also entered into Restricted Stock Agreements (“RSAs) with the Executives, whereby Wood was granted 1,100,000 shares of the Common Stock, and Roth was granted 500,000 shares of Common Stock. Subject to certain exceptions set forth in both RSAs, the shares of Common Stock granted pursuant to the RSA vest on the following schedule: (a) 50% of the shares granted to each Executive vested on January 1, 2013, (b) 25% of the shares granted to the Executives vested on January 1, 2014, and (c) the remaining 25% of the shares granted vest on January 1, 2015 so long as the Executives remain employed by the Company on such date.

~~There~~Each ~~were~~RSA noprovides ~~grants~~that the shares of ~~stock-based~~Restricted ~~awards~~Stock ~~that~~acquired ~~vested~~by ~~during~~each ~~the~~Executive ~~years~~shall ~~ended~~not ~~December~~be 31sold, ~~2012~~transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated for a period of eighteen (18) months after the vesting of such shares and ~~2011.~~that ~~There~~the ~~were~~Company noshall ~~outstanding~~retain ~~equity~~possession ~~awards~~of ~~for~~the ~~any~~certificates representing such shares of ~~our~~Restricted ~~named~~Stock ~~officers~~until such time as ofthe ~~December~~restriction ~~31,~~shall ~~2012~~have lapsed. ~~See~~ ~~below~~The ~~for~~shares of Common Stock were granted to the Executives in a ~~description~~private oftransaction ~~grants~~under an exemption from registration contained in Section 4(2) of ~~stock-based~~the ~~awards~~Securities ~~during~~Act ~~2012~~of 1933, ~~but~~in ~~which~~exchange ~~began~~for services to ~~vest~~be inprovided ~~2013~~by the Executives to the Company.

~~Compensation~~Termination. The ~~Discussion~~Executive Employment Agreements provide that if the Executive is terminated by us or by the Executive, the Executive will be entitled to receive an amount equal to the sum of (i) the Executive’s earned but unpaid Annual Base Salary through the date of termination of employment at the rate in effect at the time of such termination, (ii) vacation pay earned but not taken to the date of such termination, and ~~Analysis~~(iii) all other amounts previously deferred by Executive or earned but not paid as of such date under all Company incentive or deferred compensation plans or programs.

WeIf ~~did not have any employment agreements or arrangements with our above named executive officers during~~ the ~~years~~Executive ~~ended~~is ~~December~~terminated ~~31,~~by ~~2012~~us ~~and~~without ~~2011.~~Cause As(as ~~disclosed~~defined inbelow) the ~~Form~~Executive ~~8-K~~will webe ~~filed~~entitled ~~with~~to the ~~SEC on January 7~~following, ~~2013,~~in ~~Dr.~~addition ~~Asit~~to ~~Choksi resigned his positions as a member of~~ the ~~Board~~amounts asdescribed ~~well as the executive positions of the Company indicated in the~~ above ~~Summary Compensation Table effective December 31, 2012.~~:

~~As of November 21, 2012, Med One Oak, Inc.~~ (~~the “Company”~~i) An ~~entered~~amount ~~into~~equal ~~Executive~~to ~~Employment~~the ~~Agreements~~product ~~with~~of ~~Ivan Wood, Jr.~~ (~~“Wood”~~A) ~~and~~the ~~Pamela~~Base J.Salary ~~Roth (“Roth”) (Wood~~ and ~~Roth,~~Bonus ~~collectively,~~paid ~~the~~to ~~“Executives”). Under~~ the Executive ~~Employment~~during ~~Agreements, on January 1, 2013, Wood became~~ the ~~Chief~~immediately ~~Executive~~preceding ~~Officer~~twelve ~~and~~month ~~President~~period ofending ~~the~~on ~~Company and Roth became~~ the ~~Chief~~date ~~Financial Officer~~ of ~~the~~termination, ~~Company.~~multiplied ~~Each~~by ~~Executive~~(B) ~~Employment~~two; ~~Agreement~~provided ~~has~~that anif ~~initial~~such ~~term~~termination ofis ~~one~~within ~~year.~~24 ~~During~~months following the ~~term~~occurrence of ~~the~~a ~~Executive~~“Change ~~Employment~~of ~~Agreements~~Control”, ~~Wood~~as ~~shall be paid an annual base salary of $500~~defined,~~000,~~ ~~and~~such ~~Roth~~payment shall be ~~paid~~equal anto ~~annual~~the ~~base~~product ~~salary~~ of ~~$290,000.~~(A) At the ~~end~~Base ofSalary ~~the~~and ~~initial~~Bonus ~~term,~~paid ~~each~~to the Executive ~~Employment~~during ~~Agreement automatically renews for one-year periods unless~~ the ~~agreement~~immediately isrpeceding ~~sooner~~twelve ~~terminated~~month inperiod ~~accordance~~ending ~~with~~on the ~~terms~~date ~~thereof. The Executives are eligible for annual performance bonuses upon satisfactory completion~~ of ~~one~~termination, ~~year~~multiplied ~~of employment~~ by ~~the~~(B) ~~Company~~three. ~~and~~two ~~thereafter~~Executive’s ~~upon~~Annual ~~attainment~~Base ofSalary ~~mutually~~then ~~agreed goals and objectives. Such bonuses will be~~ in ~~amounts~~effect, aspayable ~~the Board deems appropriate or as mutually agreed to. The Executives are entitled to participate~~ in ~~all~~a ~~employee~~single ~~savings~~lump ~~and~~sum ~~welfare~~within ~~benefit~~30 ~~plans~~days ~~and~~of ~~other~~such ~~employee~~termination; ~~programs made available to the Company’s senior-level executives.~~and

In(ii) continued ~~connection~~participation ~~with~~in ~~each~~all ~~Executive~~employee ~~Employment~~benefit ~~Agreement~~plans, onprograms ~~November~~or ~~21,~~arrangements ~~2012,~~available to the Company ~~also~~executives ~~entered~~in ~~into~~which ~~Restricted Stock Agreements with~~ the ~~Executives,~~Executive ~~whereby Wood~~ was ~~granted~~participating ~~1,100,000~~on ~~shares of~~ the ~~Common~~date ~~Stock, and Roth was granted 500,000 shares~~ of ~~Common~~termination ~~Stock.~~until ~~Subject to certain exceptions set forth in both Restricted Stock Agreements,~~ the ~~shares~~earliest of ~~Common Stock granted pursuant to the Restricted Stock Agreements vest on the following schedule~~: (aA) ~~50% of~~ the ~~shares~~second ~~granted~~anniversary toof ~~each~~the ~~Executive~~date ~~vested~~of ~~on January 1~~termination, ~~2013,~~ (bB) ~~25% of~~ the ~~shares~~date ~~granted to~~ the ~~Executives~~Executive ~~vest~~Employment onAgreement ~~January~~would 1,have ~~2014 so long as they remain employed by the Company on such date~~expired, and (cC) the ~~remaining 25% of the shares granted vest on January 1, 2015 so long as the Executives remain employed by the Company on such~~ date. ~~The Restricted Stock Agreements provide that~~ the ~~shares of Restricted Stock acquired by each~~ Executive ~~shall~~receives ~~not~~coverage ~~be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated for a period of eighteen (18) months after the vesting of such shares~~ and ~~that~~benefits ~~the~~under ~~Company shall retain possession of the certificates representing~~ such ~~shares~~plans of ~~Restricted Stock until such time as the restriction shall have lapsed. The shares of Common Stock were granted to the Executives in~~ a ~~private~~subsequent ~~transaction under an exemption from registration contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, in exchange for services to be provided by the Executives to the Company~~employer.

~~Director~~If ~~Compensation~~the Executive is terminated by us for Cause, or if the Executive terminates employment without Good Reason, the payments due to Executive shall be limited to the amounts (i) the Executive’s earned but unpaid Annual Base Salary through the date of termination of employment at the rate in effect at the time of such termination, (ii) vacation pay earned but not taken to the date of such termination, and (iii) all other amounts previously deferred by Executive or earned but not paid as of such date under all our incentive or deferred compensation plans or programs.

~~The~~If ~~following~~at ~~table~~any ~~provides~~time ~~summary~~during ~~information~~the ~~concerning~~term ~~compensation~~of ~~awarded~~Executive’s toemployment hereunder, ~~earned~~Executive byis unable, due to physical or ~~paid~~mental disability, to ~~any~~perform effectively Executive’s duties hereunder, we shall continue payment of ~~our~~base ~~directors~~salary ~~for~~as ~~all~~during ~~services~~the ~~rendered~~first 12 week period of such disability to the ~~Company~~extent innot ~~all~~covered ~~capacities~~by ~~for~~our disability insurance policies. Upon the ~~year~~expiration ~~ended~~of ~~December~~such 3112 week period, ~~2012~~Med One, may, at its election, terminate Employee’s employment. If Executive should die during the term of Executive’s employment hereunder, Executive’s employment shall terminate.

Name

Fees earned or paid in cash

Stock awards

Option awards

Non-equity incentive plan compensation

All other compensation

Total

Dr. Asit Choksi (1)

David M. Rees (2)

Table of Contents

(1)	Dr. Asit Choksi was elected to the Board of Directors on April 10, 2012 and served in that capacity through his resignation as a director of the Company effective December 31, 2012.
(2)	Mr. David M. Rees resigned as a director of the Company on April 10, 2012.

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

We strive to provide our named executive officers (as defined in Item 402 of Regulation S-K) with a competitive base salary that is in line with their roles and responsibilities when compared to peer companies of comparable size in similar locations. The base salary level is established and reviewed based on the level of responsibilities, the experience and tenure of the individual and the current and potential contributions of the individual. The base salary is compared to the list of similar positions within comparable peer companies and consideration is given to the executive’s relative experience in his or her position. Base salaries are reviewed periodically and at the time of promotion or other changes in responsibilities.

We plan to implement a more comprehensive compensation program, which takes into account other elements of compensation, including, without limitation, short and long term compensation, cash and non-cash, and other equity-based compensation such as stock options. We expect that this compensation program will be comparable to the programs of our peer companies and aimed to retain and attract talented individuals. We will also consider forming a compensation committee to oversee the compensation of our named executive officers. The majority of the members of the compensation committee would be independent directors.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

No option awards were granted or outstanding during or as of the year ended December 31, 2013. The following table sets forth information regarding stock awards granted to our executive officers, which were outstanding as of December 31, 2013.

					Equity incentive plan awards
Name	Number of shares or units of stock that have not vested (#)		Market value of shares or units of stock that have not vested ($)		Number of unearned shares, units, or other rights that have not vested (#)		Market or payout value of unearned shares, units or other rights that have not vested ($)

Ivan Wood, Jr. (1)		550,000	$	22,000		-	$	-

Pamela J. Roth (2)		250,000		10,000		-		-

(1)

Ivan Wood, Jr. resigned his position of Chief Executive Officer on February 2, 2014. Pursuant to Wood’s employment agreement, all stock awards unvested at February 2, 2014, were forfeited. Accordingly, of Wood’s 550,000 stock awards unvested at December 31, 2013, set forth above, 275,000 stock awards vested on January 1, 2014, and 275,000 were forfeited upon Wood’s resignation.

(2)	Of Roth’s 250,000 stock awards unvested at December 31, 2013, set forth above, 125,000 stock awards vested on January 1, 2014 and the remaining 125,000 stock awards will vest on January 1, 2015, contingent upon Roth’s continued employment on that date.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth, as of ~~February~~March 626, ~~2013~~2014, certain information with respect to the Common Stock beneficially owned by: (i) each director and executive officer of the Company; (ii) each person who owns beneficially more than 5% of the Common Stock; and (iii) all directors and executive officers as a group:

Executive Officers and Directors
Title of Class	Name, Title and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership	Percent of class
Common Stock	~~Ivan~~David ~~Wood~~Ellent, JrM.D. ~~CEO,~~Chairman ~~President~~of &the ~~Director~~Board ~~909~~&Executive ~~Fannin~~Vice ~~Street,~~President ~~Suite~~9201 ~~2300~~Pinecroft ~~Houston~~Drive Shenandoah, TX ~~77010~~77380	~~785,125 (1)~~0	~~35.5~~0%
Common Stock	David Ellent, M.D. Vice-President & Director 9201 Pinecroft Drive Shenandoah, TX 77380	235,125 (2)	10.6%
Common Stock	Brandon Creighton Director 9201 Pinecroft Drive Shenandoah, TX 77380	0	0%
Common Stock	Joel Kerschenbaum, M.D. Director 9201 Pinecroft Drive Shenandoah, TX 77380	11,082 (3)	.5%
Common Stock	John V. Peet, M.D. Director 9201 Pinecroft Drive Shenandoah, TX 77380	29,590 (3)	1.3%
Common Stock	Tom Pisula Director 9201 Pinecroft Drive Shenandoah, TX 77380	0	0%
Common Stock	Pamela J. Roth CFO 9201 Pinecroft Drive Shenandoah, TX 77380	250,000(4)	11.3%
	All Executive Officers and Directors as a Group (7 persons)	1,310,922	59.3%

1619

Table of Contents

Beneficial Owners of More Than 5% of Company’s Equity
Common Stock	Joel Kerschenbaum, M.D. Director 9201 Pinecroft Drive Shenandoah, TX 77380	0	0%
Title of Class	Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership	Percent of Class
Common Stock	John V. Peet, M.D. Director 9201 Pinecroft Drive Shenandoah, TX 77380	0	0%
Common Stock	~~Oak~~Tom ~~Brain,~~Pisula LPDirector 9201 Pinecroft Drive Shenandoah, TX 77380	~~576,730(5)~~0	~~26.1~~0%
Common Stock	~~Brain~~Chase ~~81,~~Chandler LPCEO 9201 Pinecroft Drive Shenandoah, TX 77380	~~554,113(6)~~0	~~25.1~~0%
Common Stock	~~Brain~~Pamela 3,J. ~~LLC~~Roth CFO 9201 Pinecroft Drive Shenandoah, TX 77380	1375,~~381,293~~000(71)	6214.537%
Common Stock	~~Greater~~Cynthia ~~Houston~~West ~~Physicians~~COO ~~Medical~~9201 ~~Association~~Pinecroft ~~PLLC 8850 Six Pines~~ Drive ~~The Woodlands~~Shenandoah, TX 77380	~~250,450~~0	~~11.3~~0%
Common Stock	~~Asit~~All ~~Jaykant~~Executive ~~Choksi,~~Officers ~~M.D.~~and 46Directors ~~South~~as ~~Windsail~~a ~~Place~~Group ~~The~~(8 ~~Woodlands, TX 77381~~persons)	~~117~~375,~~562 (8)~~000	514.337%

	(1)	(Wood) Includes (i) 550,000 shares that vested on January 1, 2013 in accordance with that certain Restricted Stock Agreement described in Item 11 of this Annual Report, (ii) 226,078 shares beneficially owned through his limited partnership interest in Oak Brain, LP; and (iii) 9,047 shares beneficially owned through his 40% membership interest in Brain 3, LLC. For more information on Oak Brain, LP or Brain 3, LLC, see below footnotes 5 and 7, respectively. Does not include an additional 550,000 shares that have not vested under said Restricted Stock Agreement.
Beneficial Owners of More Than 5% of Company’s Equity
	(2)	(Ellent) Includes (i) 226,078 shares beneficially owned through his limited partnership interest in Oak Brain, LP; and (ii) 9,047 shares beneficially owned through his 40% membership interest in Brain 3, LLC. For more information on Oak Brain, LP or Brain 3, LLC, see below footnotes 5 and 7 respectively.
Title of Class	Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership	Percent of Class
Common Stock	Brain 3, LLC 9201 Pinecroft Drive Shenandoah, TX 77380	1,381,293(2)	52.92%
Common Stock	Ivan Wood, Jr. (3) 909 Fannin Street, Suite 2300 Houston, TX 77010	825,000(4)	31.61%
Common Stock	Frank Redmond, M.D. 9201 Pinecroft Drive Shenandoah, TX 77380	228,683(5)	8.76%

	(3)	(Peet & Kerschenbaum) These shares are beneficially owned by such person through such person’s limited partnership interest in Brain 81, LP. For more information on Brain 81, LP, see below footnote 6.
	(1)	(Roth) Includes (i) 250,000 and 125,000 shares that vested on January 1, 2013 and 2014, respectively, in accordance with that certain Restricted Stock Agreement described in Item 11 of this Annual Report. Does not include an additional 125,000 shares that have not vested under said Restricted Stock Agreement.
	(4)	(Roth) Includes (i) 250,000 shares that vested on January 1, 2013 in accordance with that certain Restricted Stock Agreement described in Item 11 of this Annual Report. Does not include an additional 250,000 shares that have not vested under said Restricted Stock Agreement.
	(2)	(Brain 3, LLC) Includes (i) all shares owned by Oak Brain, LP and Brain 81, LP, for whom Brain 3, LLC serves as general partner and possesses the right to vote all such shares. To avoid duplication, this figure does not include 22,617 shares beneficially owned by Brain 3, LLC through its limited partnership interests in Oak Brain, LP and Brain 81, LP; (ii) all shares owned by Greater Houston Physicians Medical Association PLLC, for whom Brain 3, LLC serves as trustee under a voting trust agreement; and (iii) all shares owned by Frank Redmond, M.D., for whom Brain 3, LLC serves as trustee under a voting trust agreement. Brain 3, LLC is managed by David Ellent, Asit Choksi, Cindy West, Pam Roth, and Samantha Townsend whose shared ownership percentages are 49%, 20%, 10.34%, 10.33%, and 10.33% respectively. As such, none of Brain 3, LLC’s managers individually retains a majority control in Brain 3, LLC and each manager individually disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares beneficially owned by Brain 3, LLC, although they each may be deemed beneficial owners of shares beneficially owned by Brain 3, LLC.

	(5)	(Oak Brain) The general partner of this limited partnership, Brain 3, LLC, possesses the right to vote all such shares. For more information on Brain 3, LLC, see below footnote 7.
	(6)	(Brain 81) The general partner of this limited partnership, Brain 3, LLC, possesses the right to vote all such shares. For more information on Brain 3, LLC, see below footnote 7.

	(7)	(Brain 3) Includes (i) all shares owned by Oak Brain, LP and Brain 81, LP, for whom Brain 3, LLC serves as general partner and possesses the right to vote all such shares. To avoid duplication, this figure does not include 22,617 shares beneficially owned through its limited partnership interests in Oak Brain, LP and Brain 81, LP. For more information on Oak Brain, LP and Brain 81, LP, see above footnotes 5 and 6 and (ii) all shares owned by Greater Houston Physicians Medical Association PLLC, for whom Brain 3, LLC serves as trustee under a voting trust agreement.
	(8)	(Choksi) Includes (i) 113,039 shares beneficially owned through his limited partnership interest in Oak Brain, LP; (ii) 4,523 shares beneficially owned through his membership interest in Brain 3, LLC. For more information on Oak Brain, LP or Brain 3, LLC, see above footnotes 5 and 7, respectively.

Table of Contents

	(3)	(Wood) Ivan Wood, Jr. was the Chief Executive Officer, President and Director of the Company until his resignation on February 2, 2013. Since his resignation occurred prior to the date of this report, he is no longer listed on the beneficial ownership table of Executive Officers and Directors, but is included on the beneficial ownership table of Beneficial Owners of 5% or more of the Company’s Equity.
	(4)	(Wood) Includes 550,000 and 275,000 shares that vested on January 1, 2013 and 2014, respectively, in accordance with that certain Restricted Stock Agreement described in Item 11 of this Annual Report. Does not include an additional 275,000 shares that have not and will not vest under said Restricted Stock Agreement pursuant to Wood’s resignation on February 2, 2013.
	(5)	(Redmond) Frank Redmond M.D. is deemed to beneficially own his shares in addition to Brain 3, LLC since Frank Redmond, M.D. has investment power over his shares, while Brain 3, LLC has the voting power over his shares under a voting trust agreement.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Dr. Asit Choksi, a Director and our Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary, and Treasurer, until his resignation on December 31, 2012, devoted substantial but less than all of his time and attention to the Company’s business beginning April 10, 2012, in conjunction with his purchase of 97.5% of our then outstanding Common Stock. During the period beginning April 10, 2012 through December 31, 2012, another entity majority owned and controlled by Dr. Choksi, also in which one of our current directors is a significant owner (the “Related Party”), paid certain general and administrative expenses on our behalf totaling $125,225, including $42,300 in 2012 salary paid to Dr. Choksi. These payments resulted in an interest free payable to ~~this~~the ~~related~~Related ~~party~~Party of $125,225 at December 31, 2012. On January 8, 2013, we issued 250,450 shares of our Common Stock to settle this $125,225 payable in full. ~~During the period January 1, 2013 through the date of this filing, this related party paid approximately $31,000 on our behalf, consisting of prepaid insurance and general and administrative expenses.~~

On January 1, 2013, the Company entered into a ~~Promissory~~ Note ~~(“Note”)~~ as borrower in favor of ~~this~~the ~~same~~Related ~~related~~Party ~~party~~ whereby the Company has the right to draw up to $1,500,000 ~~from the related party~~, with such draws to be used for working capital purposes. The Note accrues 4.25% interest per annum ~~and matures and is payable in full on September 30, 2013~~. The principal and all accrued and unpaid interest is payable either in the form of cash or shares of ~~Common~~common ~~Stock~~stock, as ~~mutually~~ agreed upon. ~~If repayment shall be in shares of Common Stock, the number of shares payable will be determined based upon the then fair market value of the Common Stock~~mutually. At any time while not in default, the Company may prepay the outstanding principal and interest without penalty. The Note is secured ~~with~~by the assets of the Company with first lien rights to the ~~related~~Related ~~party~~Party. AsThe oforiginal ~~the~~maturity date of ~~this~~the ~~filing~~Note was September 30, ~~the~~2013. ~~outstanding~~On ~~principal~~September on27, 2013, the Note was amended to extend the maturity date to January 31, 2015. At December 31, 2013, $0456,752 was outstanding on the Note.

The Company began leasing office space and services located at 9201 Pinecroft, The Woodlands, TX 77380 from a related party on January 1, 2013, pursuant to a month-to-month arrangement at a charge of $500 per month for the period from January 1, 2013 through September 30, 2013 and $750 per month beginning October 1, 2013.

Management believes the above transactions are as fair to the Company and similar to terms that could be obtained from unrelated third parties.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Audit Fees

The aggregate ~~fee~~fees billed by ~~Peter~~PKF ~~Messineo, CPA~~ for ~~audit~~audits of the Company’s annual financial statements, including reviews of quarterly financial statements filed with the SEC, was $64,~~250~~500 ~~for~~and ~~each~~$10,000 offor the years ended December 31, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011. As disclosed in Item 9 within this Annual Report~~2012, ~~the Company engaged Pannell Kerr Forster of Texas, P~~respectively.C. (“PKF”) on January 10, 2013 as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. Prior to January 2013, PKF provided no professional services to the Company nor were they engaged in any form of consultation.

Tax Fees

The aggregate fee billed by ~~Peter~~PKF ~~Messineo, CPA~~ for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning was $0 for the ~~both fiscal~~ years ended December 31, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011~~2012.

Table of Contents

All Other Fees

~~Peter~~PKF ~~Messineo, CPA~~ did not bill the Company for any products and services other than the foregoing during the years ended December 31, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011~~2012.

Audit Committees Pre-approval Policies and Procedures

Our Board serves as our audit committee. Our Board approves the engagement of our independent auditors and the related fee estimates. All of the audit services which were performed by ~~Peter~~PKF ~~Messineo, CPA~~ for the years ended December 31, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011~~2012 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

Table of Contents

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

(a)	Financial Statements

See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page F-1 for a list of each of the financial statements included in this Annual Report.

(b) Exhibits.

The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report. For convenient reference, each exhibit is listed according to the Exhibit Table of Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

Exhibit Number	Description
3.1	Certificate of Incorporation of BidGive International, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3 to the Company's Preliminary Information Statement on Schedule 14C filed on March 12, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.2	Bylaws of BidGive International, Inc. (filed as Exhibit 3 to the Company's Preliminary Information Statement on Schedule 14C filed on March 12, 2004, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.3 *	Certificate of Ownership and Merger of Parent into Subsidiary filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on April 12, 2004.
3.3	Certificate of Ownership and Merger of Parent into Subsidiary filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on April 12, 2004 (filed as Exhibit 3.3 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed February 12, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.4 *	Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on December 18, 2009.
3.4	Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on December 18, 2009 (filed as Exhibit 3.4 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed February 12, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.5 *	Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on October 23, 2012.
3.5	Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on October 23, 2012 (filed as Exhibit 3.5 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed February 12, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference).
3.6 *	Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on January 31, 2013.
3.6	Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation filed with the Delaware Secretary of State on January 31, 2013 (filed as Exhibit 3.6 to the Company’s Form 10-K filed February 12, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.1	Executive Employment Agreement entered into by and between Med One Oak, Inc. and Ivan Wood, Jr. effective as of January 1, 2013 (filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 7, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.2	Executive Employment Agreement entered into by and between Med One Oak, Inc. and Pam Roth effective as of January 1, 2013 (filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 7, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference).

10.3	Promissory Note entered into on January 1, 2013 by and between the Company as borrower in favor of Greater Houston Physician Medical Association, PLLC, (filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed January 7, 2013, and incorporated herein by reference).
10.4 *	Stock Purchase Agreement entered into by and between the Company and Greater Houstan Physician's Medical Association, P.L.L.C. as purchaser effective as of January 8, 2013.
10.4	Executive Employment Agreement entered into by and between Med One Oak, Inc. and Chase Chandler effective as of February 3, 2014 (filed as Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed March 28, 2014, and incorporated herein by reference.)
31.1 *	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
31.2 *	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
32.1 *	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
32.2 *	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

Table of Contents

31.1 *	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
31.2 *	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) and15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.
32.1 *	Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.
32.2 *	Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

________

(*)Filed herewith.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

InPursuant ~~accordance~~to ~~with~~the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

MED ONE OAK, INC.
By: /S/ Ivan Wood, Jr.	February 12, 2013
Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)

MED ONE OAK, INC.
By: /S/ Pamela J. Roth	February 12, 2013
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial Officer)

In accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Name	Title	Date
/s/ David Ellent, M.D.	Chairman and Vice President	February 12, 2013
David Ellent, M.D.
/s/ Ivan Wood, Jr.	Director, Chief Executive Officer, and President	February 12, 2013
Ivan Wood, Jr.
/s/ Joel Kerschenbaum, M.D.	Director	February 12, 2013
Joel Kerschenbaum, M.D.
/s/ John V. Peet, M.D.	Director	February 12, 2013
John V. Peet, M.D.
/s/ Thomas J. Pisula	Director	February 12, 2013
Thomas J. Pisula

MED ONE OAK, INC.

~~(formerly~~By: ~~BidGive~~/S/Chase ~~International~~Chandler March 28, ~~Inc.)~~2014

~~CONSOLIDATED~~Chief ~~FINANCIAL~~Executive ~~STATEMENTS~~Officer and President

(Principal Executive Officer)

MED ONE OAK, INC.

By: /S/ Pamela J. Roth March 28, 2014

Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Name	Title	Date

/s/ David Ellent, M.D.	Chairman and Executive Vice President	March 28, 2014
David Ellent, M.D.

/s/ Joel Kerschenbaum, M.D.	Director	March 28, 2014
Joel Kerschenbaum, M.D.

/s/ John V. Peet, M.D.	Director	March 28, 2014
John V. Peet, M.D.

/s/ Thomas J. Pisula	Director	March 28, 2014
Thomas J. Pisula

/s/ Brandon Creighton	Director	March 28, 2014
Brandon Creighton

MED ONE OAK, INC.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

INDEX

	~~Page~~	Page
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms	F-2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2012 and 2011	F-4
Balance Sheets at December 31, 2013 and 2012		F-3
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011	F-5
Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012		F-4
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Deficit for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011	F-6
Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Deficit for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012		F-5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011	F-7
Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012		F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-8
Notes to Financial Statements		F-7

~~Table of Contents~~F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of

Med One Oak, Inc.

~~(formerly~~We ~~BidGive~~have ~~International~~audited the accompanying balance sheets of Med One Oak, Inc. (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related statements of operations and comprehensive loss, changes in shareholders’ deficit, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2013. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We ~~have~~conducted ~~audited~~our ~~the~~audits ~~accompanying~~in ~~consolidated~~accordance ~~balance~~with ~~sheet~~standards of ~~Med~~the ~~One~~Public ~~Oak,~~Company ~~Inc.~~Accounting ~~(formerly~~Oversight ~~BidGive~~Board ~~International, Inc.)~~ (~~the~~United ~~“Company”~~States). asThose ofstandards ~~December~~require ~~31,~~that ~~2012,~~we plan and perform the ~~related~~audit ~~consolidated~~to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of ~~operations,~~material ~~shareholders’~~misstatement. ~~deficit,~~The ~~and~~Company ~~cash~~is ~~flows~~not ~~for~~required ~~the~~to ~~year~~have, ~~ended~~nor ~~December~~were 31we engaged to perform, ~~2012~~an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. ~~These~~Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial ~~statements~~reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the ~~responsibility~~circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s ~~management.~~internal ~~Our~~control ~~responsibility~~over isfinancial toreporting. Accordingly, we express anno such opinion. An audit includes examining, on ~~these~~a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, ~~based~~assessing onthe accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our ~~audit~~audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

WeIn ~~conducted~~ our ~~audit~~opinion, insuch ~~accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the~~ financial statements ~~are~~present ~~free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have~~fairly, ~~nor~~in ~~were~~all wematerial ~~engaged to perform~~respects, anthe ~~audit of its internal control over~~ financial ~~reporting.~~position ~~Our audit included consideration~~ of ~~internal~~the ~~control~~Med ~~over~~One ~~financial~~Oak, ~~reporting~~Inc. as aof ~~basis~~December ~~for~~31, ~~designing~~2013 ~~audit~~and ~~procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances~~2012, ~~but~~and ~~not for~~ the ~~purpose~~results of ~~expressing~~its anoperations ~~opinion~~and oncash ~~the~~flows ~~effectiveness~~for each of the ~~Company’s~~two ~~internal~~years ~~control~~in ~~over~~the ~~financial~~period ~~reporting.~~ended ~~Accordingly,~~December ~~we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining~~31, ~~on a test basis~~2013, ~~evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures~~ in ~~the~~conformity ~~financial~~with ~~statements,~~U. ~~assessing~~S. ~~the~~generally accepted accounting principles ~~used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation~~. ~~We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.~~

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Med One Oak, Inc. as of December 31, 2012, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2012, in conformity with U. S. generally accepted accounting principles.

/s/ Pannell Kerr Forster of Texas, P. C.

Houston, Texas

~~February~~March 1228, ~~2013~~2014

F-2

~~Table~~MED ofONE ~~Contents~~OAK, INC.

~~Report~~BALANCE ~~of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm~~SHEETS

Board of Directors and Stockholders

	December 31,
	2013			2012
ASSETS

Cash	$	84		$	-
Receivables from clients, net		242,646			-
Receivables from related party, net		28,827			-
Unbilled receivables		6,297			-
Unbilled receivables from related party		2,860			-
Prepaid expenses		2,825			-
Total current assets		283,539			-

Total assets	$	283,539		$	-

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT

Accounts payable	$	4,181		$	10
Accrued compensation		28,639			-
Payable to related party		-			125,225
Total current liabilities		32,820			125,235

Note payable to related party		456,752			-

Total liabilities		489,572			125,235

Common stock subject to rescission rights, $0.001 par value; 216 shares issued and outstanding		40,500			40,500

Commitments and contingencies		-			-

Shareholders’ deficit:
Preferred stock: $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding for both December 31, 2013 and 2012		-			-
Common stock: $0.001 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 2,209,911 and 1,159,461 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively (includes shares subject to rescission rights)		2,210			1,159
Additional paid in capital		1,912,507			1,772,333
Accumulated deficit		(2,161,250	)		(1,939,227	)
Total shareholders' deficit		(246,533	)		(165,735	)

Total liabilities and shareholders' deficit	$	283,539		$	-

~~Med~~The ~~One~~accompanying ~~Oak,~~notes ~~Inc~~are an integral part of these financial statements.

(formerly BidGive International, Inc.)

I have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Med One Oak, Inc. (formerly Bidgive International, Inc.) (the "Company") as of December 31, 2011 and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ deficit and cash flows for the year then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on my audit.

I conducted my audit in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor was I engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, I express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audit provides a reasonable basis for my opinions.

In my opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Med One Oak, Inc. (formerly Bidgive International, Inc.) as of December 31, 2011 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 4 to the financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring operating loss, has negative working capital as of December 31, 2011, has not yet established an ongoing source of revenues sufficient to cover its operating costs and the cash resources of the Company are insufficient to meet its planned business objectives. These and other factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plan regarding these matters is also described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Peter Messineo, CPA

Palm Harbor, Florida

March 28, 2012

F-3

Table of Contents

MED ONE OAK, INC.

~~(formerly~~STATEMENTS ~~BidGive~~OF ~~International,~~OPERATIONS ~~Inc.)~~AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	Year Ended December 31,
	2013			2012

Revenues:
Service revenues	$	248,944		$	-
Service revenues from related party		546,217
Total revenues		795,161			-

Direct cost of revenues:
Cost of service revenues		241,694			-
Cost of service revenues from related party		530,306			-
Total direct cost of revenues		772,000			-

Operating expenses
General and administrative expenses		239,557			163,699

Loss from operations		(216,396	)		(163,699	)

Other income (expenses)
Interest expense		(964	)		-
Interest expense – related party		(4,663	)		-
Total other expenses		(5,627	)		-

Loss before income tax expense		(222,023	)		(163,699	)
Income tax expense		-			-

Net loss and total comprehensive loss	$	(222,023	)	$	(163,699	)

Basic and diluted net loss per common share	$	(0.10	)	$	(0.14	)
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding, including common shares subject to rescission rights		2,202,230			1,159,339

	December 31,
	2012			2011
ASSETS
Cash	$	-		$	-
Total current assets		-			-
Total assets	$	-		$	-
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	10		$	4,750
Payable to related party		125,225			-
Total current liabilities		125,235			4,750
Total liabilities		125,235			4,750
Common stock subject to rescission rights, $0.001 par value; 216 shares issued and outstanding		40,500			40,500
Commitments and contingencies		-			-
Shareholders’ deficit:
Preferred stock: $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding for both December 31, 2012 and 2011		-			-
Common stock: $0.001 par value; 150,000,000 shares authorized; 1,159,461 and 1,159,298 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively (includes shares subject to rescission rights from above)		1,159			1,159
Additional paid in capital		1,772,333			1,729,119
Accumulated deficit		(1,939,227	)		(1,775,528	)
Total shareholders' deficit		(165,735	)		(45,250	)
Total liabilities and shareholders' deficit	$	-		$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-4

Table of Contents

MED ONE OAK, INC.

~~(formerly~~STATEMENTS ~~BidGive~~OF ~~International,~~CHANGES ~~Inc.)~~IN SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	Common Stock				Additional Paid in			Accumulated			Total Shareholders’
	Shares		Amount		Capital			Deficit			Deficit

Balance, December 31, 2011		1,159,082	$	1,159	$	1,729,119		$	(1,775,528	)	$	(45,250	)
Proceeds from related party contribution		-		-		11,214			-			11,214
Stock based compensation		-		-		32,000			-			32,000
Effect of 10 to 1 reverse stock split		163		-		-			-			-
Net loss		-		-		-			(163,699	)		(163,699	)
Balance, December 31, 2012		1,159,245		1,159		1,772,333			( 1,939,227	)		(165,735	)
Common stock issued to executives		800,000		801		(801	)		-			-
Common stock issued to satisfy payable to related party		250,450		250		124,975			-			125,225
Stock based compensation		-		-		16,000			-			16,000
Net loss		-		-		-			(222,023	)		(222,023	)
Balance, December 31, 2013		2,209,695	$	2,210	$	1,912,507		$	(2,161,250	)	$	(246,533	)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2012			2011
Sales revenues	$	-		$	1,875
Cost of goods sold		-			1,150
Gross Profit		-			725
Operating expenses
General and administrative expenses		163,699			328,284
Loss from operations		(163,699	)		(327,559	)
Other income (expense)
Interest expense		-			(6,216	)
Gain on debt extinguishment		-			112,949
Gain on sales of assets		-			17,577
Total other income (expense)		-			124,310
Loss before income tax expense		(163,699	)		(203,249	)
Income tax expense		-			-
Net loss and total comprehensive loss	$	(163,699	)	$	(203,249	)
Basic and diluted net loss per share	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.18	)
Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding, including shares subject to rescission		1,159,339			1,151,079

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-5

Table of Contents

MED ONE OAK, INC.

~~(formerly~~STATEMENTS ~~BidGive~~OF ~~International,~~CASH ~~Inc.)~~FLOWS

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

	Year Ended December 31,
	2013			2012

OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(222,023	)	$	(163,699	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operations:
Stock based compensation		16,000			32,000
Non-cash charges to operations, net		378,362			-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Trade receivables		(271,473	)		-
Unbilled services		(9,157	)		-
Prepaid expenses		37,175			-
Accounts payable and accrued compensation		32,810			(4,740	)
Payable to related party		-			125,225
Net cash used in operations		(38,306	)		(11,214	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from note payable to related party		78,390			-
Repayment of note payable		(40,000	)		-
Proceeds from related party contributions		-			11,214
Net cash provided by financing activities		38,390			11,214

Increase in cash and cash equivalents		84			-
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		-			-
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	84		$	-

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	943		$	-
Income taxes paid	$	-		$	-

Non-cash items:
Common stock issued to satisfy payable to related party	$	125,225		$	-
Insurance paid with premium financing obligation	$	40,000		$	-

~~For~~The ~~the~~accompanying ~~years~~notes ~~ended~~are ~~December~~an ~~31,~~integral ~~2012~~part ~~and~~of ~~2011~~these financial statements.

	Common Stock				Additional Paid in		Accumulated			Total Shareholders’
	Shares		Amount		Capital		Deficit			Deficit
Balance, December 31, 2010		859,082	$	859	$	1,202,994	$	(1,572,279	)	$	(368,426	)
Shares issued to consultants for services		300,000		300		299,700		-			300,000
Debt forgiven by related parties		-		-		226,425		-			226,425
Net loss		-		-		-		(203,249	)		(203,249	)
Balance, December 31, 2011		1,159,082		1,159		1,729,119		( 1,775,528	)		( 45,250	)
Proceeds from related party contribution		-		-		11,214		-			11,214
Stock based compensation		-		-		32,000		-			32,000
Effect of 10 to 1 reverse stock split		163		-		-		-			-
Net loss		-		-		-		(163,699	)		(163,699	)
Balance, December 31, 2012		1,159,245	$	1,159	$	1,772,333	$	(1,939,227	)	$	(165,735	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

F-6

Table of Contents

MED ONE OAK, INC.

~~(formerly~~NOTES ~~BidGive~~TO ~~International,~~FINANCIAL ~~Inc.)~~STATEMENTS

~~CONSOLIDATED~~December ~~STATEMENTS~~31, ~~OF CASH FLOWS~~2013

	Year Ended December 31,
	2012			2011
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(163,699	)	$	(203,249	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operations:
Stock based compensation		32,000			-
Shares issued to consultants for services		-			300,000
Gain on sales of assets		-			(17,577	)
Gain on debt extinguishment		-			(112,949	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		-			1,613
Payable to related party		125,225			-
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(4,740	)		40,902
Net cash (used in) provided by operations		(11,214	)		8,740
INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from sale of assets		-			17,577
Net cash provided by investing activities		-			17,577
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from related party contributions		11,214			-
Repayment of loan payable		-			(2,065	)
Repayment of loans from shareholder		-			(24,867	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		11,214			(26,932	)
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents		-			(615	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		-			615
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year	$	-		$	-
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	-		$	-
Income taxes paid	$	-		$	-
Non-cash items:
Capital contribution resulting from forgiveness of related party debt, consisting of accrued interest and notes, loans and other payables	$	-		$	226,425

NOTE 1 –DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

~~The~~Med ~~accompanying~~One ~~notes~~Oak, ~~are~~Inc. an(“Med ~~integral~~One,” ~~part~~“we”, or the “Company”) was originally incorporated as Rolfe Enterprises, Inc. under the laws of ~~these~~the ~~consolidated~~state ~~financial~~of ~~statements~~Florida on May 6, 1996, as a “blind pool” or “blank check” company whose business plan was to seek to acquire a business opportunity through completion of a merger, exchange of stock, or other similar type of transaction. We commenced operations during 2003, with our principal operations consisting of e-commerce marketing and retailing, and we were reincorporated on April 12, 2004 in the state of Delaware as BidGive International, Inc.

~~F-7~~On March 31, 2011, we sold our operations and became a shell company with limited operations. We recommenced operations in 2013, with our principal operations consisting of operational and financial consulting services. We help clients improve performance, comply with complex regulations, strategically grow their business, expand their operations into new markets, market their service and product offerings, streamline operations, and reduce costs. Our professionals employ their expertise in healthcare administration, management, finance and operations to provide our clients with specialized analyses and customized advice and solutions that are tailored to address each client’s particular challenges and opportunities. Since 2013, we have primarily provided business consulting services to financially sound organizations in the healthcare industry in and around Houston, Texas.

Table of Contents

MED ONE OAK, INC.

(formerly BidGive International, Inc.)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2012

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Med One Oak, Inc. (“Med One,” “we”, or the “Company”) was originally incorporated as Rolfe Enterprises, Inc. under the laws of the state of Florida on May 6, 1996, as a “blind pool” or “blank check” company. The Company was reincorporated on April 12, 2004 in the state of Delaware as BidGive International, Inc. The purpose of the reincorporation was to change the Company’s name and state of domicile. The Company commenced operations during 2003, with its principal operations consisting of e-commerce marketing and retailing. On March 31, 2011, the Company sold its operations and became a shell company with limited operations. The consideration for this transaction consisted of the buyer’s assumption of the liabilities of the operations of the Company.

On April 10, 2012, Choksi, Ltd. entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement, with certain holders of an aggregate of 1,130,843 shares (11,308,430 pre-split shares) of the Company’s common stock for $370,000 (approximately 97.5% of the Company’s then outstanding shares of common stock). On October 23, 2012, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to its Certificate of Incorporation and changed its name from BidGive International, Inc. to Med One Oak, Inc.

On October 8, 2012, the Company authorized a 10 for 1 reverse stock split on its outstanding shares of Common Stock, which became effective on December 6, 2012. This reverse stock split has been presented retroactively to the earliest period presented in the consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements.

On December 31, 2012, two Texas limited partnerships, Brain 81, LP, and Oak Brain, LP, collectively, the “Buyers”, each entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement (collectively, the “SPAs”) with Choksi, Ltd. pursuant to which the Buyers purchased Choksi Ltd.’s 1,130,843 shares of Common Stock, all restricted as to resale, for an aggregate purchase price of $565,422.

On December 31, 2012, the Company appointed four new members to its Board of Directors. Also on December 31, 2012, Dr. Asit Choksi resigned from his position as a member of the Board of Directors as well as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, President, Secretary and Treasurer. On January 1, 2013, the Board of Directors appointed new officers of the Company in the positions of Chief Executive Officer and President, Chief Financial Officer, and Vice-President, and also appointed one new member to the Board of Directors. Also, on February 6, 2013, the Board of Directors appointed one new member to the Board of Directors.

On January 1, 2013 the Company issued a Promissory Note under which the Company has the right to draw up to $1,500,000 for working capital purposes.

The Company is currently working towards effecting one or more transactions to acquire or purchase as of yet unidentified assets and operations in the health care industry.

Liquidity

The Company’s financial statements are prepared using U.S. generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business.

~~The~~During ~~Company~~the ~~has~~year ~~not~~ended ~~yet~~December ~~established~~31, an2013, ~~ongoing~~the ~~source~~Company recognized revenue of ~~revenues~~$795,161 from providing management consulting services. Prior to that, the Company was a shell company and recognized no revenue. The Company has historically incurred net losses, which have resulted in an accumulated deficit of $12,~~939~~161,~~227~~250 at December 31, ~~2012~~2013. The Company ~~has~~incurred ~~negative~~net ~~working~~losses ~~capital~~ of $~~125~~222,~~235,~~023 atand ~~December 31, 2012, which primarily consisted of a~~ $~~125~~163,~~225~~699 ~~payable~~for tothe ayears ~~related~~ended ~~party.~~December ~~On January 8~~31, 2013 ~~the~~and ~~Company issued 250~~2012,~~450~~ ~~shares of common stock to the related party to settle this payable in full~~respectively.

~~F-8~~The Company used net cash in operations of $38,306 and $11,214 for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and had cash and working capital of $84 and $250,719, at December 31, 2013. The Company funded cash shortfalls during 2013 with advances on a Promissory Note (the “Note”) to a related party, entered into on January 1, 2013, whereby the Company has the ability to draw up to $1,500,000 for working capital purposes. At December 31, 2013, the outstanding balance on the Note was $456,752, including accrued interest of $4,663, and is payable in full on January 31, 2015. Management believes that the approximate $1,043,000 available under this Note is sufficient to sustain its current level of operations for the next 12 months. However, growth of operations or acquisition of business or assets is dependent upon the Company’s ability to raise additional capital through the issuance of additional debt and/or equity securities, of which our ability to do so on favorable terms is uncertain.

~~Table~~NOTE of2 ~~Contents~~– SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

On January 1, 2013, the Company entered into a Promissory Note with a related party whereby the Company has the ability to draw up to $1,500,000 during the period from January 1, 2013 through September 30, 2013 to pay ongoing operating expenses. The Promissory Note can be settled in cash or shares of the Company’s Common Stock at its maturity date, for both the outstanding principle and accrued interest. If settled for shares of the Company’s Common Stock, the number of shares issued will be based upon fair value of the Company’s Common Stock at the time of settlement. Management believes that the $1,500,000 available under this Promissory Note is sufficient to sustain its current level of operations for the next 12 months. However, growth of operations or acquisition of business or assets is dependent upon the Company’s ability to raise additional capital through the issuance of additional debt and/or equity securities, of which our ability to do so on favorable terms is uncertain.

NOTE 2 – SIGNIFICANT ACCOUINTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The ~~consolidated~~ financial statements of the Company asare ~~of December 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the years then ended have been~~ prepared in accordance with United States (“U.S.”) generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). The consolidated financial statements include the inactive accounts of its wholly-owned subsidiary, MPublishing, LLC, a disregarded entity. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in the consolidation process.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the ~~reported~~ amounts ofthat ~~assets~~are ~~and~~reported ~~liabilities~~in ~~and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at~~ the ~~date~~Financial ofStatements ~~the consolidated financial statements~~ and ~~the~~accompanying ~~reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period~~disclosures. Actual results ~~could~~may differ significantly from these estimates and assumptions.

F-7

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the related services are provided, the price is fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. We generate the majority of our revenues from providing professional services under three types of billing arrangements: time-and-expense, fixed-fee and performance-based. If at the outset of an arrangement we determine that the arrangement fee is not fixed or determinable, revenue is deferred until all criteria for recognizing revenue are met.

Direct Cost of Revenues

Direct cost of revenues consists primarily of billable employee compensation and related payroll benefits and direct expenses billable to clients. Direct cost of revenues does not include an allocation of overhead costs.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Unbilled Services

F-8

During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, we recorded provisions for doubtful accounts and unbilled services of $0. At December 31, 2013, our accounts receivable totaled $271,473, which was collected in full during February 2014.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Such cash equivalents generally are part of the Company’s cash management activities rather than part of its operating, investing, and financing activities. The Company had no cash or cash equivalents at December 31, 2012 ~~and 2011~~.

Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for accounts payable, accrued liabilities, and payable to related party each qualify as financial instruments and are a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the short period of time between the origination of such instruments and their expected realization and their current market rate of interest.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

~~GAAP~~The ~~defines~~carrying ~~fair~~amount ~~value~~of asour ~~the~~cash ~~price~~and ~~that~~cash ~~would~~equivalents, bereceivables ~~received~~from toclients, ~~sell~~notes anand ~~asset~~accounts orpayable ~~paid~~approximates tofair ~~transfer~~value abecause ~~liability~~of ~~in an orderly transaction between market participants at~~ the ~~measurement~~short ~~date~~maturity and ~~establishes a~~liquidity ~~three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures~~ of ~~fair~~those ~~value measurements~~instruments. ~~The three levels are defined as follows:~~

~~Level~~Fair 1Value – Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets at the measurement date for identical assets or liabilities. Level 2 – Other inputs that are observable, directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.Measurement

~~Level~~Financial 3assets -and ~~Unobservable~~liabilities ~~inputs~~recorded ~~for~~in ~~which~~the ~~there~~accompanying isBalance ~~little~~Sheets orare nocategorized ~~market~~based ~~data~~on ~~and~~the ~~which~~inputs wein ~~make our own assumptions about how market participants would price~~ the ~~assets~~valuation ~~and~~techniques ~~liabilities.~~as follows:

AtLevel ~~December~~1— ~~31,~~Financial ~~2012~~assets and ~~2011,~~liabilities ~~the~~whose ~~Company~~values ~~had~~are nobased ~~instruments~~on quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that ~~required~~the ~~fair~~reporting ~~value~~entity can access at the measurement date.

~~F-9~~Level 2— Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

~~Table~~Level of3— ~~Contents~~Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

Financial instruments, which potentially subject usthe Company to concentrations of credit risk, ~~consist~~primarily ~~principally~~include ofaccounts ~~cash~~receivable. Accounts receivable at December 31, ~~cash~~2013 ~~equivalents~~consisted ~~and~~of ~~accounts~~amounts ~~receivables.~~due Atfrom ~~December~~health ~~31,~~care ~~2012~~entities ~~and~~located ~~2011,~~in the ~~Company~~Houston ~~held~~Texas nometropolitan ~~cash~~area, ~~cash~~for ~~equivalents,~~management orconsulting ~~accounts~~services ~~receivable~~provide by the Company.

~~Revenue~~To ~~Recognition~~the extent receivables from clients become delinquent, collection activities commence. The allowances for doubtful accounts and unbilled services are based upon the expected ability to collect accounts receivable, and bill and collect unbilled services. The Company believes its allowance for doubtful accounts adequately provides for estimated losses as of December 31, 2013 and 2012.

The Company recognizes revenue when evidence of an arrangement exists, the fee is determinable, services are provided, and collection is reasonably assured.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company accounts for all stock-based compensation arrangements using a fair value method and records such expense on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, net of our estimated amount of expected forfeitures.

F-9

Income Taxes

Basic and Diluted Net Income (Loss) Per Share

Basic net income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per common share is determined using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period, adjusted for the dilutive effect of common stock equivalents. In periods when losses are reported, the diluted weighted average number of common shares excludes common stock equivalents because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

Because the Company has no components of other comprehensive income, comprehensive income (loss) is the same as net income (loss) for the years ended December 31, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011~~2012.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The Company has implemented all accounting pronouncements that are in effect and that may impact its financial statements and does not believe that there are any other accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

NOTE 3 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Note Payable to Related Party

On January 1, 2013, the Company entered into a Note as borrower in favor of a related party with indirect ownership of the Company (“Related Party”) whereby the Company has the right to draw up to $1,500,000 from the Related Party, with such draws to be used for working capital purposes. The Note accrues 4.25% interest per annum.

The principal and all accrued and unpaid interest is payable either in the form of cash or shares of common stock, as agreed upon mutually. If repayment shall be in shares of common stock, the number of shares payable will be determined based upon the then fair market value of the common stock. At any time while not in default, the Company may prepay the outstanding principal and interest without penalty. The Note is secured by the assets of the Company with first lien rights to the Related Party.

The original maturity date of the Note was September 30, 2013. On September 27, 2013, the Note was amended to extend the maturity date to January 31, 2015. Accordingly, the Note is classified as noncurrent on the accompanying Balance Sheet.

F-10

~~Table~~At December 31, 2013, $456,752 was outstanding on the Note. Following is a summary of ~~Contents~~transactions with the Related Party that resulted in advances on or repayments of the Note during the year ended December 31, 2013.

NOTE 3 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Cash advances	$	78,390
Noncash advances (1)		897,916
Noncash repayments (2)		(524,217	)
Accrued interest		4,663
Outstanding, December 31, 2013	$	456,752

Common Stock

(1)

During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Related Party provided noncash advances comprised of direct payment of $6,750, for the Company’s office rent and $891,156, respectively, for other operating expenses. The Company rents corporate office space on a month to month basis from the Related Party for $750 per month, beginning October 1, 2013. Monthly rent was $500 per month prior to October 1, 2013.

(2)

Commencing January 1, 2013 and throughout the year ended December 31, 2013, our Executives provided management consulting services to the Related Party for actual time incurred providing such services. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recognized revenues and gross profit from providing these services of $546,217 and $15,911, respectively. The Company expects to continue these consulting services up until a time when the Company acquires significant assets or operations.

OnPayable October 8, 2012, the Company authorized a 10 for 1 reverse stock split on its outstanding shares of Common Stock, which became effective on December 6, 2012. To effectuate the reverse stock split, the Company issued an additional 163 shares of its Common Stock to ~~address~~Related ~~fractional shares. This reverse stock split has been presented retroactively to all periods presented in the consolidated financial statements and notes to consolidated financial statements.~~Party

During ~~2011~~2012, certain of the Company’s ~~issued~~general ~~300~~and administrative expenses,~~000~~ (3aggregating $125,~~000~~225,~~000~~ ~~pre-split)~~were ~~shares~~paid offor ~~Common~~by ~~Stock~~the toRelated aParty, ~~consulting~~on ~~firm~~behalf ~~for~~of ~~services~~the ~~rendered~~Company. ~~The~~At ~~shares~~December ~~were~~31, ~~valued~~2012, in the ~~amount~~outstanding ofpayable to this related party was $~~300~~125,~~000~~225, ~~the~~and ~~fair~~on ~~market~~January ~~value~~8, of2013, the ~~shares~~Company atissued ~~the~~Common ~~time~~Stock ofto ~~issuance~~settle this payable in full.

OnNOTE ~~November~~4 ~~21,~~– ~~2012,~~STOCKHOLDERS’ the Company entered into Restricted Stock Agreements (“RSAs”) with Ivan Wood, Jr. (“Wood”) and Pamela J. Roth (“Roth”), collectively the “Executives”, whereby Wood and Roth were granted 1,100,000 and 500,000 shares of Common Stock, respectively, collectively referred to as the “Executive Shares”. Subject to certain exceptions set forth in the RSAs, the Executive Shares vest to each of the Executives on the following schedule: 50% of the shares granted vest on January 1, 2013 so long as they are employed by the Company on such date and 25% of the shares granted vest on each of January 1, 2014 and January 1, 2015, so long as they remain employed by the Company on such dates. The Executive Shares were fair valued at $64,000, which was the fair market value of the shares at the time of grant. During the period from November 21, 2012 to December 31, 2012, the Company recognized compensation expense of $32,000 in exchange for services provided, and at December 31, 2012, compensation expense of $32,000 remains unrecognized, and will be recognized ratably over the next two years.EQUITY

~~The~~Common ~~RSAs~~Stock ~~provide~~Issued that the Executive Shares acquired by each Executive shall not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated for a period of 18 months after the vesting of such shares and that the Company shall retain possession of the certificates representing the Executive Shares until such time as the restriction shall have lapsed. The Executive Shares were granted in a private transaction under an exemption from registration contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, in exchange for services to ~~be provided by the~~ Executives ~~to the Company.~~

On November 21, 2012, the Company entered into Restricted Stock Agreements (“RSAs”) with Ivan Wood, Jr. (“Wood”) and Pamela J. Roth (“Roth”), collectively the “Executives”, whereby Wood and Roth were granted 1,100,000 and 500,000 shares of Common Stock, respectively, collectively referred to as the “Executive Shares”. The RSAs provide that the Executive Shares acquired by each Executive shall not be sold, transferred, pledged, assigned, or otherwise alienated or hypothecated for a period of 18 months after the vesting of such shares and that the Company shall retain possession of the certificates representing the Executive Shares until such time as the restriction shall have lapsed.

The Executive Shares were granted in a private transaction under an exemption from registration contained in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, in exchange for services to be provided by the Executives to the Company and were fair valued at $64,000, which was the fair market value of the shares at the time of grant. Subject to certain exceptions set forth in the RSAs, the Executive Shares vest to each of the Executives on the following schedule: 50% of such shares vested and were issued to the two individuals upon their employment with the Company as executives on January 1, 2013; 25% of such shares vested and were issued to the two individuals on January 1, 2014; and the remaining 25% of the total shares vest subject to continued executive employment on January 1, 2015.

On January 1, 2013 and January 1, 2014, the Company issued 800,000 and 400,000 Executive Shares, respectively, pursuant to the RSA vesting schedule. Due to Wood’s resignation on February 2, 2014, only 125,000 additional shares will vest on January 1, 2015, subject to Roth’s continued employment.

During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $16,000 and $32,000, respectively. At December 31, 2013, approximately $6,000 of stock based compensation expense remains unrecognized and will be ratably recognized over one year.

F-11

Common Stock issued to Related Party

On January 8, 2013, the Company issued 250,450 shares of its Common Stock to a related party to settle in full the Company’s payable to that related party, which was $125,225 as of December 31, 2012 and January 8, 2013, the date of settlement of the payable.

Common Stock Subject to Rescission Rights

During 2004, the Company issued 216 (post-split) shares of Common Stock in a private placement for $40,500, after filing a registration statement on Form SB-2 with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These shares were issued in reliance upon claimed exemptions from registration, which, in retrospect, may not be available. As a result, the purchasers of these shares may have rescission rights for recovery of the purchase price paid for the shares with interest. Accordingly, $40,500 has been recorded as “common stock subject to rescission rights” on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Interest to be paid contingent upon the possibility of rescission is considered immaterial.

Preferred Stock

Our board of directors has the authority, without further action by the stockholders, to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001, in one or more series and to designate the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of each series. The issuance of preferred stock could have the effect of restricting dividends on the common stock, diluting the voting power of the common stock, impairing the liquidation rights of the common stock or delaying or preventing our change in control without further action by the stockholders. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, no shares of Preferred Stock were issued or outstanding.

~~Warrants~~NOTE 5 – INCOME TAXES

~~During~~No ~~2007,~~income ~~the~~tax ~~Company~~expense ~~granted~~has ~~1,200~~been ~~(post-split)~~recognized ~~common~~for ~~stock~~the ~~warrants~~years toended ~~consultants~~December 31, ~~which~~2013 ~~vested~~and ~~immediately~~2012 ~~and~~as ~~were~~the ~~exercisable~~Company atincurred a ~~price~~net ofoperating ~~$38.00~~loss ~~any time~~ for aincome ~~period~~tax ofpurposes ~~five~~in ~~years.~~each ~~The~~year ~~1,200 warrants were outstanding at December 31, 2011~~ and ~~expired~~has ~~unexercised during 2012. At December, 31, 2012,~~ no ~~warrants~~carryback ~~were outstanding~~potential.

F-11

Table of Contents

NOTE 4 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Payable to Related Party

During 2012, certain of the Company’s general and administrative expenses, aggregating $125,225, were paid for by a related party with indirect ownership of the Company, on behalf of the Company. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the outstanding payable to this related party was $125,225 and $0, respectively. On January 8, 2013, the Company issued 250,450 shares of its Common Stock to settle this payable in full.

Debt Forgiven by Related Parties

During the years 2006 through 2010, the Company issued short-term notes payable and short-term convertible notes payable to certain of its officers and shareholders, with interest ranging from 4% to 12%. During December 2011, all of such notes were forgiven by the holders. Aggregate outstanding principal balances and accrued interest at the time of forgiveness was $226,425, and the forgiveness was accounted for as a contribution to equity.

NOTE 5 – OTHER INCOME

During March 2011, the Company sold its assets and operations in exchange for the buyer’s assumption of certain of its operating liabilities and recognized a gain on sale of assets of $17,577. Also during March 2011, the company recognized a $112,949 gain on extinguishment of debt as a result of forgiveness of accounts payable by third party providers.

NOTE 6 – INCOME TAXES

No income tax expense has been recognized for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 as the Company incurred a net operating loss for income tax purposes in each year and has no carryback potential.

Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

	December 31,
	2012			2011
	2013			2012
Deferred tax asset:
Net operating loss carryforwards	$	~~496~~566,~~549~~596		$	~~604~~496,~~745~~549
Deferred tax asset before valuation allowance		~~496~~566,~~549~~596			~~604~~496,~~745~~549
Valuation allowance		(~~485~~561,~~669~~156	)		(~~604~~485,~~745~~669	)
Net deferred tax asset		105,~~880~~440			-10,880
Deferred tax liability:
Stock compensation		(105,~~880~~440	)		-(10,880	)
Net deferred tax liability		(105,~~880~~440	)		-(10,880	)
Net deferred tax asset (liability)	$	-		$	-

The Company has provided a full valuation allowance for net deferred tax assets as it is deemed more likely than not that these assets will not be realized due to lack of positive evidence to suggest otherwise. During the years ended December 31, ~~2012~~2013 and ~~2011~~2012, the valuation allowance increased (decreased) ~~increased~~ by ($~~119~~75,~~076)~~487 and ($70119,~~000~~076), respectively.

F-12

~~Table~~A reconciliation of ~~Contents~~the federal statutory income tax rate to the Company’s effective tax rate, as reported, is as follows for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:

A reconciliation of the federal statutory income tax rate to the Company’s effective tax rate, as reported, is as follows for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:

	Year ended December 31,
	2013			2012
Income taxes at federal statutory rate		34.0	%		34.0	%
Prior year true up - Federal		-			(106.7	)%
Change in valuation allowance		(34.0	%)		72.7	%
Effective income tax rate		0.0	%		0.0	%

	Year ended December 31,
	2012			2011
Income taxes at federal statutory rate		34.0	%		34.0	%
Prior year true up - Federal		(106.7	)%		0.0	%
Change in valuation allowance		72.7	%		(34.0	)%
Effective income tax rate		0.0	%		0.0	%

At December 31, 2013, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $1.7 million which may be offset against future income through 2032. Current tax laws limit the amount of loss available to be offset against future taxable income when a substantial change in ownership occurs. Therefore, the amount available to offset future taxable income will be limited.

AtThe ~~December~~Company’s ~~31,~~federal ~~2012,~~and state income tax returns for the ~~Company~~years ~~had~~ended ~~net~~2008 ~~operating~~through ~~loss~~2012 ~~carryforwards~~are ofopen ~~approximately~~to $1examination.5 ~~million~~At ~~which~~December ~~may~~31, be2013 ~~offset~~and ~~against~~2012, ~~future~~the ~~income~~Company ~~through~~evaluated ~~2031.~~its ~~Current~~open tax ~~laws~~years ~~limit~~in ~~the~~all ~~amount~~known ofjurisdictions. ~~loss~~Based ~~available~~on tothis beevaluation, ~~offset~~the ~~against~~Company ~~future~~did ~~taxable~~not ~~income~~identify ~~when~~any auncertain ~~substantial~~tax ~~change~~positions. inFor ~~ownership~~the ~~occurs.~~years ~~Therefore~~ended December 31, ~~the~~2013 ~~amount~~and ~~available~~2012, we recorded no interest expense and penalties related to ~~offset~~unrecognized ~~future~~tax ~~taxable~~benefits ~~income~~associated ~~will~~with beuncertain ~~limited~~tax positions.

~~The~~NOTE ~~Company’s~~6 ~~federal~~– ~~and~~SUBSEQUENT state income tax returns for the years ended 2007 through 2011 are open to examination. At December 31, 2012 and 2011, the Company evaluated its open tax years in all known jurisdictions. Based on this evaluation, the Company did not identify any uncertain tax positions. For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we recorded no interest expense and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits associated with uncertain tax positions.EVENTS

~~NOTE~~On 7February –2, ~~SUBSEQUENT~~2014, ~~EVENTS~~Ivan Wood, Jr. resigned his positions as President, Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and member of the Board of Directors of Med One. There were no disagreements between the Company and Mr. Wood on any matter, and there were no outstanding obligations to Mr. Wood as of or subsequent to February 2, 2014.

~~Promissory~~On ~~Note~~February 3, 2014, Med One entered into Executive Employment Agreement with Chase Chandler (“Chandler”), pursuant to ~~Related~~which ~~Party~~Chandler became the President and CEO of the Company. Chandler’s Executive Employment Agreement has an initial term of one year. During the initial term of the Executive Employment Agreement, the Company anticipates Chandler’s duties as President and CEO will not constitute a full time workload; accordingly, Chandler’s annual base salary during the initial term shall be $100,000. At the end of the initial term, the Executive Employment Agreement automatically renews for additional one-year periods unless the agreement is sooner terminated in accordance with the terms thereof. If at any time Chandler’s duties increase to a full time workload, Chandler’s annual salary will increase accordingly, as mutually agreed to between Chandler and the Company.

On ~~January~~March 125, ~~2013~~2014, ~~the~~Med ~~Company~~One entered into a ~~Promissory~~Consulting ~~Note~~Services ~~(“Note”)~~Agreement ~~as borrower in favor of a related party~~ with ~~indirect~~Apollo ~~ownership~~Hospital ofSystem ~~the~~LP ~~Company~~ (“~~Related~~Apollo ~~Party~~Hospital”), whereby ~~the~~Med ~~Company~~One ~~has~~will ~~the~~provide ~~right~~consulting toservices ~~draw up~~ to ~~$1,500,000~~Apollo ~~from~~Hospital. ~~the~~Services ~~Related~~provided ~~Party~~will include, ~~with~~but ~~such~~will ~~draws~~not to be ~~used~~limited ~~for~~to: ~~working~~accounting, ~~capital~~financial, ~~purposes.~~operational, ~~The~~project ~~Note~~management, ~~accrues~~merger ~~4.25% interest per annum~~ and ~~matures~~acquisition, and isgeneral ~~payable~~business inadvisory ~~full on September 30, 2013~~services. ~~The~~Services ~~principal~~will ~~and~~be ~~all~~billed ~~accrued~~at ~~and~~fixed ~~unpaid~~hourly ~~interest~~rates isexpected ~~payable~~to ~~either~~range infrom ~~the~~$80 ~~form~~to of$200 ~~cash~~for orprofessionals ~~shares~~and of$40 ~~common~~to ~~stock,~~$125 asfor ~~mutually~~support ~~agreed upon~~staff. IfThe ~~repayment~~Consulting ~~shall~~Services beAgreement inallows ~~shares~~for ~~of common stock~~termination, ~~the~~with ~~number~~a of30 ~~shares~~day ~~payable~~notice, ~~will~~at ~~be determined based upon the then fair market value of the common stock. At~~ any time ~~while~~after ~~not~~an ininitial ~~default,~~90 ~~the~~day ~~Company~~period, ~~may~~commencing ~~prepay~~on ~~the~~March ~~outstanding~~25, ~~principal and interest without penalty~~2014. ~~The Note is secured with the assets of the Company with first lien rights to the Related Party.~~

~~Issuance of Common Stock to Settle Payable to~~ Related Party Transactions

OnAs ~~January~~discussed 8in Note 3 above, during 2013, certain of the Company’s ~~issued~~operating ~~250~~expenses were paid for by a Related Party,~~450~~ ~~shares~~on behalf of ~~its~~the ~~Common~~Company. ~~Stock~~During tothe aperiod ~~related~~January ~~party~~1, to2014 ~~settle~~through inthe ~~full~~date of this filing, this Related Party paid $155,300 of the Company’s ~~payable~~operating toexpenses, ~~that~~on ~~related~~its ~~party~~behalf, which ~~was~~were ~~$125,225~~accounted for as ofnoncash ~~December~~advances 31on the Note to this Related Party. Also during this period, ~~2012~~the Company received cash advances of $2,900 and ~~January~~made 8cash payments of $271,456 ~~2013~~on its Note to this Related Party. Additionally, during this period the ~~date~~Company recognized revenue of ~~settlement~~approximately $25,000 from management consulting services provided to the Related Party, which was accounted for as a noncash repayment of the ~~payable~~Note.

Other Items

As discussed in Note 4 above, during 2012, certain of the Company’s general and administrative expenses were paid for by a related party with indirect ownership of the Company, on behalf of the Company. During the period January 1, 2013 through the date of this filing, this related party paid approximately $31,000 on our behalf, consisting of prepaid insurance and general and administrative expenses.

F-13

Filing Compare · Med One Oak, Inc.