~~Table~~UNITED ~~of Contents~~STATES

~~UNITED~~SECURITIES ~~STATES~~AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

~~SECURITIES~~Washington, ~~AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION~~ D.C. 20549

~~Washington,~~FORM ~~D.C. 20549~~ 10-K

~~FORM~~Annual ~~10-K~~ Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of

~~Annual~~The ~~Report~~Securities ~~Pursuant~~Exchange toAct ~~Section 13 or 15(d)~~ of 1934

For the ~~Securities~~fiscal ~~Exchange~~year ~~Act~~ended ofSeptember ~~1934~~30, 2011

~~For~~Commission ~~the~~file ~~fiscal~~number ~~year ended September 30, 2010~~ 1-11700

~~Commission~~HEMAGEN ~~file~~DIAGNOSTICS, ~~number 1-11700~~ INC.

~~HEMAGEN~~(Exact ~~DIAGNOSTICS,~~Name ~~INC.~~of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

~~(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)~~ Delaware 04-2869857

Delaware		04-2869857
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. employer identification No.)
9033 Red Branch Rd., Columbia, MD		21045
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

(State or Other Jurisdiction (I.R.S. employer

~~(443~~ of Incorporation or Organization) ~~367-5500~~ identification No.)

~~(Issuer’s~~9033 ~~telephone~~Red ~~number~~Branch Rd., ~~Including~~Columbia, ~~Area Code)~~ MD 21045

~~Securities registered pursuant to Section 12~~(b)Address of ~~the~~Principal ~~Act:~~Executive ~~None~~Offices) (Zip Code)

~~Securities registered pursuant to Section 12~~(g443) ~~of the Act: Common Stock.~~ 367-5500

~~Indicate~~(Issuer's bytelephone ~~check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer~~number, asIncluding ~~defined~~Area ~~in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. ¨ Yes x No~~ Code)

~~Indicate~~Securities byregistered ~~check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports~~ pursuant to Section 13 ~~of Section 15~~12(db) of the Act~~. ¨ Yes x No~~: None

~~Note—Checking~~Securities ~~the~~registered ~~box above will not relieve any registrant required to file reports~~ pursuant to Section 13 ~~or 15~~12(dg) of the ~~Exchange~~ Act: ~~from~~Common ~~their obligations under those Sections~~Stock.

Indicate by check mark ~~whether~~if the registrant ~~(1) has~~is ~~filed all~~a ~~reports~~well-known ~~required~~seasoned toissuer, beas ~~filed~~defined byin ~~Section 13~~Rule or405 ~~15(d)~~ of the Securities ~~Exchange~~ Act ~~of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days~~. ~~x Yes ¨ No~~

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). ¨ ~~Yes ¨~~oYes x No

Indicate by check mark if ~~disclosure~~the ofregistrant ~~delinquent~~is ~~filers~~not ~~pursuant~~required to ~~Item 405~~file ofreports ~~Regulation~~pursuant ~~S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will be contained,~~ to ~~the~~Section ~~best~~13 of ~~registrant’s~~Section ~~knowledge,~~15(d) ~~in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III~~ of ~~this~~the ~~Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K~~Act. x

~~Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ¨ Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company~~ oYes x No

~~Indicate~~Note by– ~~check~~Checking ~~mark~~the ~~whether~~box ~~the~~above will not relieve any registrant isrequired ato ~~shell~~file ~~company~~reports ~~(as~~pursuant ~~defined~~to inSection ~~Rule~~13 ~~12b-2~~or 15(d) of the Exchange Act~~). ¨ Yes x No~~ from their obligations under those Sections.

~~The~~Indicate ~~aggregate~~by ~~market~~check ~~value~~mark ofwhether the ~~voting~~registrant ~~stock~~(1) ~~held~~has filed all reports required to be filed by ~~non-affiliates~~Section 13 or 15(d) of the ~~registrant~~Securities onExchange ~~March 31,~~Act ~~2010,~~of ~~was~~1934 ~~$1,231,803~~during ~~based~~the onpreceding ~~a closing~~12 ~~price~~months of(or ~~$0.09~~for ~~per~~such ~~share~~shorter ofperiod ~~Common~~that ~~Stock.~~the Asregistrant ofwas ~~December 17,~~required ~~2010,~~to 15file such reports),~~470,281~~ ~~shares~~and of(2) ~~Common~~has ~~Stock~~been ~~were~~subject ~~outstanding.~~to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

~~DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE~~ x Yes o No

~~None~~Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

~~Table of Contents~~x Yes o No

~~HEMAGEN~~Indicate ~~DIAGNOSTICS,~~by ~~INC~~check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

~~INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K~~ o

~~Table~~Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of ~~Contents~~“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

PART I		4
Item 1.	Business	4
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	10
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	10
Item 2.	Properties	10
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	11
Item 4.	(Removed and Reserved)	11
PART II		12
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	12
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	13
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation	13
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	17
Item 8.	Financial Statements	17
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	17
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	18
Item 9B.	Other Information	18
PART III		19
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	19
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	20
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholders Matters	23
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	24
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	24
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	25

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) o	Smaller reporting company x

~~This~~Indicate Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. Certain statements contained in this report that are not historical facts constitute forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are intended to be covered by ~~the~~check ~~safe~~mark ~~harbors~~whether created by that Act. Forward looking statements may be identified by words such as “estimates”, “anticipates”, “projects”, “plans”, “expects”, “intends”, “believes”, “should” and similar expressions or the ~~negative~~registrant ~~versions~~is ~~thereof~~a ~~and~~shell ~~by the context in which they are used. Such statements, whether express or implied, are based on current expectations of the~~ company ~~and speak only~~ (as ofdefined ~~the~~in ~~date~~Rule ~~made. Reliance should not be placed on forward~~12b-~~looking~~2 statements because they involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause actual results, performance or achievements to differ materially from those expressed or implied. Hemagen undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements as a result of ~~new information or to reflect events or circumstances after~~ the ~~date on which they are made~~Act).

Statements concerning the establishments of reserves and adjustments for dated and obsolete products, expected financial performance, on-going business strategies and possible future action which Hemagen intends to pursue to achieve strategic objectives constitute forward-looking information. All forward-looking statements, including those relating to the sufficiency of such charges, implementation of strategies and the achievement of financial performance are each subject to numerous conditions, uncertainties, risks and other factors. Factors which could cause actual performance to differ materially from these forward-looking statements, include, without o Yes x No

2The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant on March 31, 2011, was $816,361 based on a closing price of $0.06 per share of Common Stock. As of December 5, 2011, 15,490,281 shares of Common Stock were outstanding.

~~Table~~DOCUMENTS ofINCORPORATED ~~Contents~~BY REFERENCE

limitation, management’s analysis of Hemagen’s assets, liabilities and operations, the failure to sell date–sensitive inventory prior to its expiration, competition, new product development by competitors which could render particular products obsolete, the inability to develop or acquire and successfully introduce new products or improvements of existing products, recessionary pressures on the economy and the markets in which our customers operate, costs and difficulties in complying with the laws and regulations administered by the United States Food and Drug Administration, changes in the relative strength of the UNone.S. Dollar and Brazilian Reals, unfavorable political or economic developments in Brazilian operations, and the ability to assimilate successfully product acquisitions and other factors disclosed in our reports on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K filed with the SEC.

3 2

~~Table~~HEMAGEN ofDIAGNOSTICS, ~~Contents~~INC.

~~PART~~INDEX ITO ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM 10-K

~~Item~~Table 1.of ~~Business.~~Contents

Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. is a biotechnology company that develops, manufactures, and markets approximately 68 Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) cleared proprietary medical diagnostic test kits and components. There are two different product lines, the Virgo® line and the Analyst® line. The Virgo® product line consist of various diagnostic test kits that are used to aid in the diagnosis of certain autoimmune and infectious diseases, using ELISA, Immunoflourescence, and hemagglutination technology. The Analyst® product line is an FDA-cleared Benchtop Clinical Chemistry Analyzer System, including consumables that are used to measure important constituents in human and animal blood. The Company was incorporated in Delaware in 1985 and became a public company in 1993. Hemagen’s principal offices are located at 9033 Red Branch Road, Columbia, Maryland 21045 and the telephone number is (443) 367-5500. Hemagen maintains a website at www.hemagen.com. Investors can obtain copies of our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission from our web site free of charge as well as from the Securities and Exchange Commission website at www.sec.gov.

PART I		4

Item 1.	Business.	4
Item 1A	Risk Factors.	9
Item 1B	Unresolved Staff Comments.	9
Item 2.	Properties.	10
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings.	10
Item 4.	(Removed and Reserved)	10

PART II		10

Item 5.	Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	10
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	11
Item 7.	Management's Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation	11
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	15
Item 8.	Financial Statements	15
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	15
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	15
Item 9B.	Other Information	16

PART III		16

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	16
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	17
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholders Matters	19
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	20
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	20
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	21

InThis ~~September~~Annual ~~1998~~Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements. Certain statements contained in this report that are not historical facts constitute forward-looking statements, within the ~~Company~~meaning ~~acquired~~of the ~~Analyst®~~Private ~~Benchtop Clinical~~Securities ~~Chemistry~~Litigation ~~System~~Reform Act of 1995, ~~which~~and ~~was~~are ~~originally~~intended ~~designed~~to be covered by ~~Dupont~~the safe harbors created by that Act. Forward looking statements may be identified by words such as “estimates”, ~~from~~“anticipates”, ~~Dade~~“projects”, ~~Behring~~“plans”, ~~Inc.~~“expects”, ~~The~~“intends”, ~~Analyst®~~“believes”, is“should” ~~a proprietary~~and ~~bench~~similar ~~top~~expressions ~~clinical~~or ~~chemistry~~the ~~instrument~~negative versions thereof and ~~reagent~~by ~~system.~~the ~~The~~context ~~Analyst®~~in ~~instrument~~which isthey are used. Such tostatements, ~~test general~~whether ~~chemistry~~express ~~profiles~~or ~~for~~implied, ~~both~~are based on current expectations of the ~~human~~company and ~~veterinary~~speak ~~markets~~only ~~using~~as aof ~~proprietary~~the ~~consumable~~date ~~rotor~~made. ~~that~~Reliance isshould ~~manufactured~~not bybe ~~Hemagen~~placed aton ~~its~~forward-looking ~~Columbia,~~statements ~~Maryland~~because ~~facility.~~they ~~The~~involve ~~Analyst®~~known isand ~~cleared~~unknown byrisks, ~~the~~uncertainties ~~FDA~~and ~~for~~other ~~marketing~~factors inwhich ~~the~~may ~~United~~cause ~~States~~actual results, performance or achievements to ~~physician~~differ ~~office~~materially ~~laboratories.~~from Inthose ~~December~~expressed ~~2002,~~or implied. Hemagen ~~also~~undertakes ~~acquired~~no ~~another~~obligation ~~veterinary~~to ~~chemistry analyzer~~update ~~system,~~any ~~the~~forward-looking ~~Endocheck.~~statements ~~Today,~~as ~~Hemagen~~a ~~estimates~~result ~~that~~of ~~its~~new ~~customer~~information ~~base~~or ~~for~~to ~~the~~reflect ~~Analyst®~~events ~~is approximately~~or ~~90%~~circumstances ~~veterinary~~after ~~practices~~the ~~and~~date ~~10%~~on ~~physician~~which ~~office~~they ~~laboratory~~are ~~practices~~made.

InStatements ~~1995~~concerning the establishments of reserves and adjustments for dated and obsolete products, expected financial performance, on-going business strategies and possible future action which Hemagen ~~completed~~ intends to pursue to achieve strategic objectives constitute forward-looking information. All forward-looking statements, including those relating to the ~~acquisition~~sufficiency of asuch ~~comprehensive~~charges, ~~line~~implementation of ~~diagnostic~~strategies ~~test~~and ~~kits~~the ~~utilizing~~achievement ~~immunofluorescence~~of ~~technology~~financial ~~(“IFA~~performance ~~products”)~~are ~~from~~each ~~Schiaparelli~~subject ~~Biosystems~~to numerous conditions, ~~Inc~~uncertainties, risks and other factors. Factors ~~The~~which ~~IFA~~could ~~products~~cause ~~and~~actual performance to differ materially from these forward-looking statements, include, without limitation, management’s analysis of Hemagen’s ~~comprehensive~~assets, ~~line~~liabilities ofand ~~proprietary diagnostic~~operations, ~~test~~the ~~kits~~failure ~~based~~to onsell ~~enzyme-linked~~date–sensitive ~~immunosorbence~~inventory ~~assay~~prior ~~technologies~~to ~~(“ELISA”~~its expiration, competition, new product development by competitors which could render particular products obsolete, the inability to develop or ~~“EIA”)~~acquire and ~~hemagglutination~~successfully ~~technology~~introduce ~~(“HA”)~~new ~~form~~products or improvements of existing products, recessionary pressures on the ~~Virgo®~~economy ~~product~~and ~~line.~~the ~~These~~markets ~~products~~in ~~are~~which ~~used~~our tocustomers ~~test~~operate, ~~for~~costs ~~autoimmune~~and difficulties in complying with the laws and ~~infectious~~regulations ~~diseases~~administered by the United States Food and ~~are~~Drug ~~manufactured~~Administration, ~~for~~changes ~~manual~~in ~~use~~the relative strength of the U.S. Dollar and Brazilian Reals, unfavorable political or ~~for~~economic ~~use~~developments in Brazilian operations, and the ability to assimilate successfully product acquisitions and other factors disclosed in our reports on ~~automated~~Forms ~~instrument~~10-K, ~~platforms~~10-Q and 8-K filed with the SEC.

The Virgo® product-line is marketed directly to reference laboratories, hospitals, and universities in the United States, among others and internationally. There are over 30 distributors that market the Virgo® product line. Hemagen also markets the Virgo® product line in South America through its wholly-owned subsidiary Hemagen Diagnosticos Comercio, Importacao Exportacao, Ltd. (HDC), a Brazilian limited liability company. 3

~~Recent~~PART ~~Developments~~ I

~~During~~Item ~~fiscal 2010 management continued to work toward achieving its goal of increasing shareholder value and achieving sustained profitability~~1. ~~Some of the important steps taken toward achieving those goals were as follows:~~ Business.

•Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. is a biotechnology company that develops, manufactures, and markets approximately 68 Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") cleared proprietary medical diagnostic test kits and components. There are two different product lines, the Virgo® line and the Analyst® line. The Virgo® product line consist of various diagnostic test kits that are used to aid in the diagnosis of certain autoimmune and infectious diseases, using ELISA, Immunoflourescence, and hemagglutination technology. The Analyst® product line is an FDA-cleared Benchtop Clinical Chemistry Analyzer System, including consumables that are used to measure important constituents in human and animal blood. The Company was incorporated in Delaware in 1985 and became a public company in 1993. Hemagen’s ~~bolstered~~principal ~~its~~offices ~~manufacturing~~are located at 9033 Red Branch Road, ~~scientific~~Columbia, Maryland 21045 and ~~sales~~the ~~capabilities~~telephone bynumber ~~recruiting~~is ~~several~~(443) ~~key~~367-5500. Hemagen ~~employees~~maintains a website at www.hemagen.com. Investors can obtain copies of our filings with the Securities and ~~consultants~~Exchange Commission from our web site free of charge as well as from the Securities and Exchange Commission website at www.sec.gov.

•In ~~During~~September 1998, the ~~year~~Company acquired the Analystâ Benchtop Clinical Chemistry System, which was originally designed by Dupont, from Dade Behring, Inc. The Analyst® is a proprietary bench top clinical chemistry instrument and reagent system. The Analyst® instrument is used to test general chemistry profiles for both the ~~Company~~human ~~renewed~~and veterinary markets using a proprietary consumable rotor that is manufactured by Hemagen at its ~~working~~Columbia, ~~capital~~Maryland ~~line~~facility. The ~~with~~Analyst® ~~Bay~~is ~~Bank~~cleared by the FDA for marketing in the United States to physician office laboratories. In December 2002, Hemagen also acquired another veterinary chemistry analyzer system, the Endocheck. Today, Hemagen estimates that its customer base for the Analyst® is approximately 90% veterinary practices and 10% physician office laboratory practices.

•In ~~The~~1995, ~~Company~~Hemagen ~~looked~~completed ~~for~~the ~~opportunities~~acquisition toof ~~consolidate~~a ~~operations~~comprehensive ~~into~~line ~~more~~of ~~efficient~~diagnostic ~~space~~test kits utilizing immunofluorescence technology (“IFA products”) from Schiaparelli Biosystems, Inc. The IFA products and ~~continues~~Hemagen’s comprehensive line of proprietary diagnostic test kits based on enzyme-linked immunosorbence assay technologies (“ELISA” or “EIA”) and hemagglutination technology (“HA”) form the Virgoâ product line. These products are used to ~~seek~~test ~~out~~for autoimmune and ~~implement~~infectious ~~cost~~diseases ~~reductions~~and are manufactured for manual use or for use on automated instrument platforms.

• The ~~Company~~Virgo® ~~improved~~product-line ~~financial~~is ~~performance~~marketed ~~despite~~directly ~~revenue~~to ~~decline~~reference laboratories, hospitals, and universities in the United States, among others and internationally. There are over 30 distributors that market the Virgoâ product line. Hemagen also markets the Virgoâ product line in South America through ~~strategic~~its ~~management~~wholly-owned ofsubsidiary ~~expenses~~Hemagen Diagnosticos Comercio, Importacao Exportacao, Ltd. (HDC), a Brazilian limited liability company.

•Recent ~~The Company is working on redesigning and developing several new products.~~Developments

4During fiscal 2011 management continued to work toward achieving its goal of increasing shareholder value and achieving sustained profitability. Some of the important steps taken toward achieving those goals were as follows:

~~Table~~· ofHemagen ~~Contents~~has engaged four PhD level personnel to improve and bolster its manufacturing and product development capabilities.

~~Technology~~· The Company looked for opportunities to consolidate operations into more efficient space, and continues to seek out and implement cost reductions.

~~Analyst~~· ~~Instrument~~Hemagen ~~System~~completed the improvements to its autoimmune Elisa line and product offering.

~~Hemagen~~· ~~acquired a rotor based technology for use in the Analyst® in 1998.~~ The ~~Analyst®~~Company is aworking ~~bench-top~~on ~~centrifugal~~bringing ~~clinical~~various ~~chemistry~~processes ~~analyzer. The Analyst® utilizes a consumable rotor that contains dry prepackaged reagents. The Analyst® spins the rotor, mixing the patient sample with the dry reagents, producing a result~~ in ~~approximately~~house ~~ten minutes. Hemagen currently markets four types of rotors providing a variety of clinical chemistry tests, which are 510(k) cleared by the FDA for the human medical market and four types of rotors~~ that ~~are~~were ~~exclusively~~previously ~~sold for the veterinary market~~outsourced. The Analyst® instrument has been designated by the Clinical Laboratory Improvements Amendments (CLIA) as a moderately complex system, and is therefore suitable for both the physician and veterinary office laboratories. Hemagen’s blood chemistry and Analyst® system assays are used to aid in the monitoring and measurement of health profiles, such as cholesterol, blood urea nitrogen, triglycerides, glucose and uric acid.

In· ~~addition,~~ Hemagen ~~has~~is ~~entered~~evaluating ~~into~~several ~~agreements~~new totechnology ~~distribute~~renovations athat ~~hematology~~it ~~analyzer~~believes ~~and~~will anbe ~~electrolyte and~~implemented ~~blood~~in ~~gas analyzer to complement the Analyst®~~2012.

~~Autoimmune and Infectious Disease Assays~~ 4

Detection of the presence and concentration of certain antibodies in human blood can assist physicians in the diagnosis of certain diseases. Hemagen’s assays are in vitro (outside of a patient’s body) diagnostic tests that are used to measure specific substances, antibodies, in blood or other body fluids. Our assays recognize specific antibodies that bind to our assay platforms in the proper environment, making it detectable either by the naked eye, or with the aid of a laboratory technique, which amplifies the reaction so that it is rendered visible. Hemagen’s hemagglutination, ELISA and immunofluorescence assays are three examples of such techniques. Technology

~~Immunofluorescence~~Analyst Instrument System

~~Hemagen’s~~The ~~immunofluorescence~~Analyst® ~~tests~~is ~~are~~a ~~manufactured~~bench-top ~~using~~centrifugal ~~several~~clinical ~~procedures~~chemistry ~~with~~analyzer. The ~~the~~Analyst® ~~most~~utilizes ~~common~~a ~~being~~consumable ~~mammalian~~rotor ~~cells~~that ~~grown~~contains ondry ~~microscope~~prepackaged ~~slides~~reagents. ~~treated~~The ~~with~~Analyst® ~~disease-producing~~spins ~~organisms~~the ~~(viral~~rotor, ~~or bacterial).~~mixing ~~Serum~~the ~~from a~~ patient issample ~~placed~~with inthe ~~contact~~dry ~~with~~reagents, ~~the~~producing ~~infected~~a ~~cells~~result onin ~~the~~approximately ~~slides~~ten minutes. IfHemagen acurrently ~~patient~~markets ~~has~~four ~~antibodies~~types toof ~~the~~rotors ~~organism~~providing ~~causing~~a ~~the~~variety ~~disease~~of clinical chemistry tests, ~~the~~which ~~antibodies~~are ~~will~~510(k) ~~bind~~cleared toby the ~~organism.~~FDA Afor ~~chemical~~the ~~reagent~~human ismedical ~~added~~market toand ~~the~~two ~~slide~~types of rotors that ~~binds~~ toare ~~the~~exclusively ~~organism~~sold ~~and~~for the ~~antibody,~~veterinary ifmarket. ~~present~~The ~~and~~Analyst® ~~detectable.~~instrument ~~When~~has been designated by the ~~slide~~Clinical isLaboratory ~~illuminated~~Improvements ~~with~~Amendments ~~light~~(CLIA) atas a ~~specific~~moderately ~~wavelength~~complex insystem, aand ~~fluorescent~~is ~~microscope,~~therefore suitable for both the ~~chemically-treated~~physician ~~cells~~and ~~will~~veterinary ~~appear~~office ~~with~~laboratories. aHemagen’s ~~specific~~blood ~~fluorescent~~chemistry ~~pattern, indicating~~and aAnalyst® ~~positive~~system ~~test~~assays ~~result.~~are Ifused ~~the~~to ~~patient~~aid ~~does~~in ~~not~~the ~~have~~monitoring ~~detectable~~and ~~quantities~~measurement of ~~the~~health ~~appropriate antibody~~profiles, nosuch ~~fluorescence~~as ~~will~~cholesterol, ~~appear~~blood ~~producing~~urea anitrogen, ~~negative~~triglycerides, ~~test~~glucose ~~result.~~and uric acid.

~~Enzyme~~In ~~Linked~~addition, ~~Immunosorbent~~Hemagen ~~Assays~~has entered into agreements to distribute a hematology analyzer and an electrolyte and blood gas analyzer to complement the Analyst®.

~~ELISA~~Autoimmune orand ~~EIA~~Infectious ~~tests~~Disease employ small plastic wells coated with particular antigens. The test process involves introducing the patient’s serum into the well to allow a reaction to occur. If the antibody being tested for is present, it will bind to the antigens on the inner surface of the well. After the wells are rinsed, the specifically bound antibody will remain while any non-specific antibodies will be washed away. To detect the quantity of the specific antibody, other compounds (conjugate, substrate) are added which will cause a color change in the liquid, the intensity of which is proportionate to the quantity of the specific antibody found. If no color is noted, this indicates that the patient’s serum did not contain detectable quantities of the specific antibody. Assays

~~Hemagen~~Detection ~~has~~of ~~developed~~the anpresence ~~application~~and ~~for its~~concentration ~~ELISA~~of ~~technology~~certain toantibodies ~~detect~~in ~~cardiovascular~~human ~~and~~blood ~~inflammatory~~can ~~risk~~assist ~~factors~~physicians ~~(apolipoproteins)~~in ~~and~~the ~~inflammatory~~diagnosis ~~signals~~of ~~(acute~~certain ~~phase~~diseases. Hemagen's ~~reactants),~~assays ~~the~~are ~~latter~~in ofvitro ~~which~~(outside ~~are~~of ~~present in~~ a patient’'s ~~blood~~body) ~~prior~~diagnostic tests that are used to ~~the~~measure ~~clinical~~specific ~~manifestation~~substances, ~~of infection~~antibodies, in blood or ~~inflammation~~other body fluids. Our Ifassays ~~successful,~~recognize ~~these~~specific ~~technologies~~antibodies ~~could~~that ~~lead~~bind to ~~earlier~~our ~~detection~~assay ~~and~~platforms ~~prevention~~in ofthe ~~cardiovascular~~proper ~~disease~~environment, ~~the~~making ~~imminent~~it ~~rejection~~detectable ofeither ~~transplanted~~by ~~organs~~the naked eye, or with the ~~onset~~aid of ~~infections.~~a ~~Such~~laboratory ~~earlier~~technique, ~~detection~~which ~~could~~amplifies ~~enable physicians~~the toreaction ~~better~~so ~~plan~~that ~~appropriate~~it ~~treatment~~is ofrendered ~~patients with these conditions~~visible. Hemagen's ~~currently~~hemagglutination, ~~markets~~ELISA ~~two~~and ~~test~~immunofluorescence ~~kits~~assays toare ~~detect~~three ~~inflammatory~~examples ~~signals.~~of such techniques.

5 Immunofluorescence

~~Table~~Hemagen's immunofluorescence tests are manufactured using several procedures with the most common being mammalian cells grown on microscope slides treated with disease-producing organisms (viral or bacterial). Serum from a patient is placed in contact with the infected cells on the slides. If a patient has antibodies to the organism causing the disease, the antibodies will bind to the organism. A chemical reagent is added to the slide that binds to the organism and the antibody, if present and detectable. When the slide is illuminated with light at a specific wavelength in a fluorescent microscope, the chemically-treated cells will appear with a specific fluorescent pattern, indicating a positive test result. If the patient does not have detectable quantities of ~~Contents~~the appropriate antibody, no fluorescence will appear producing a negative test result.

~~Hemagglutination~~Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent Assays

~~Hemagglutination~~ELISA ~~is the agglutination~~ or ~~“clumping”~~EIA oftests ~~red~~employ ~~blood~~small ~~cells~~plastic ~~(RBCs).~~wells ~~Many~~coated ~~substances,~~with ~~including~~particular ~~certain~~antigens. ~~antibodies, when~~The ~~placed~~test inprocess ~~contact~~involves ~~with~~introducing ~~RBCs,~~the ~~will~~patient's ~~cause~~serum ~~agglutination.~~into ~~Under~~ the ~~appropriate~~well ~~conditions,~~to ~~human~~allow ~~RBCs~~a ~~may~~reaction beto ~~modified~~occur. If orthe ~~sensitized~~antibody bybeing ~~binding~~tested ~~specific~~for ~~foreign~~is ~~antigens~~present, toit ~~their surface. These sensitized RBCs~~ will bind to the ~~specific~~antigens ~~antibody and~~on ~~this~~the ~~will~~inner ~~cause~~surface ~~agglutination~~ of ~~these~~the ~~cells~~well. After ~~The~~the ~~presence~~wells ofare ~~certain~~rinsed, ~~antibodies~~the inspecifically anbound ~~individual’s~~antibody ~~serum~~will ~~(blood~~remain ~~from~~while ~~which~~any ~~clotted~~non-specific ~~RBCs~~antibodies ~~have~~will ~~been~~be ~~removed)~~washed ~~can indicate certain diseases~~away. To Bydetect ~~sensitizing~~the ~~RBCs~~quantity ~~with~~of anthe ~~antigen~~specific ~~that~~antibody, ~~specifically reacts~~other ~~with~~compounds ~~a particular antibody~~(conjugate, ~~the~~substrate) ~~simple~~are ~~visible~~added ~~observation~~which ofwill ~~the~~cause ~~agglutination~~a ~~reaction~~color ~~will~~change ~~indicate~~in the ~~presence~~liquid, of the ~~disease-produced~~intensity ~~antibody. The use~~ of ~~RBCs~~which ~~instead~~is ofproportionate ~~other~~to ~~particles~~the ~~can~~quantity ~~allow for simple visual observation~~ of the ~~agglutination~~ ~~reaction~~specific inantibody ~~the~~found. If ~~proper~~no ~~environment,~~color ~~and~~is ~~reduces~~noted, ~~the~~this ~~non-specific~~indicates ~~reactions~~that ~~seen~~the inpatient's ~~artificial~~serum ~~systems~~did ~~such~~not ascontain ~~those~~detectable ~~that~~quantities ~~utilize~~of ~~latex~~the ~~particles.~~specific antibody.

~~To perform~~ Hemagen’s ~~hemagglutination~~has ~~test,~~developed aan ~~technician~~application ~~combines~~for ~~Hemagen’s~~its ~~sensitized~~ELISA ~~RBCs~~technology ~~with~~to adetect ~~patient’s~~cardiovascular ~~serum~~and ininflammatory arisk ~~small~~factors ~~well~~(apolipoproteins) ~~with~~and ainflammatory ~~V-shaped~~signals ~~bottom~~(acute ~~according~~phase toreactants), ~~directions~~the ~~included with~~latter ~~Hemagen’s~~of ~~test~~which ~~kits.~~are Ifpresent noin ~~agglutination~~a ~~takes~~patient's ~~place,~~blood ~~the~~prior ~~RBCs will settle~~ to the ~~bottom~~clinical manifestation of ~~the~~infection ~~well,~~or ~~resulting~~inflammation. If insuccessful, athese ~~clearly~~technologies ~~visible~~could ~~red~~lead ~~dot~~to ~~which~~earlier ~~indicates~~detection ~~that~~and ~~the~~prevention ~~test~~of iscardiovascular ~~negative. In contrast~~disease, if the ~~particular~~imminent ~~antibody~~rejection isof ~~present~~transplanted ~~in the~~organs ~~patient’s~~or ~~blood,~~ the ~~RBCs~~onset ~~will~~of ~~agglutinate,~~infections. ~~which~~Such ~~prevents~~earlier ~~the~~detection ~~RBCs~~could ~~from~~enable ~~settling~~physicians to ~~the~~better ~~bottom~~plan ofappropriate ~~the~~treatment ~~well. Instead~~ of ~~the~~patients ~~small~~with ~~red~~these ~~dot,~~conditions. Hemagen ~~the~~currently ~~substance~~markets ~~will~~two ~~appear~~test akits ~~diffuse~~to ~~red,~~detect ~~which~~inflammatory ~~indicates a positive reaction~~signals.

~~Current Products~~ Hemagglutination

~~Analyst®~~Hemagglutination ~~System~~is ~~Products~~the agglutination or "clumping" of red blood cells (RBCs). Many substances, including certain antibodies, when placed in contact with RBCs, will cause agglutination. Under the appropriate conditions, human RBCs may be modified or sensitized by binding specific foreign antigens to their surface.

Hemagen currently markets four FDA 510(k) cleared rotor types for use on the Analyst® clinical chemistry analyzer, two general chemistry rotors, a glucose test and a lipid screen test. In addition, Hemagen sells four rotors specifically designed for the veterinary marketplace: VET-16, VetFlex7, VetFlex and T4 rotors. 5

~~Immunofluorescence~~These orsensitized ~~“IFA”~~RBCs ~~Products~~will bind to the specific antibody and this will cause agglutination of these cells. The presence of certain antibodies in an individual’s serum (blood from which clotted RBCs have been removed) can indicate certain diseases. By sensitizing RBCs with an antigen that specifically reacts with a particular antibody, the simple visible observation of the agglutination reaction will indicate the presence of the disease-produced antibody. The use of RBCs instead of other particles can allow for simple visual observation of the agglutination reaction in the proper environment, and reduces the non-specific reactions seen in artificial systems such as those that utilize latex particles.

To perform Hemagen’'s ~~immunofluorescence~~hemagglutination ~~products~~test, ~~consist~~a ~~primarily~~technician ofcombines ~~diagnostic~~Hemagen's ~~assays~~sensitized ~~for~~RBCs ~~infectious~~with ~~diseases~~a ~~and~~patient's ~~several~~serum ~~products~~in ~~for~~a ~~autoimmune~~small ~~diseases.~~well ~~Immunofluorescence~~with a V-shaped bottom according to directions included with Hemagen's test kits. If ~~are~~no ~~used~~agglutination astakes ~~primary~~place, ~~or confirmatory~~the ~~tests~~RBCs will settle to the bottom of the well, resulting in ~~many~~a ~~large~~clearly ~~clinical~~visible ~~laboratories~~red ~~worldwide~~dot which indicates that the test is negative. In ~~Hemagen~~contrast, ~~currently~~if ~~sells~~the 15particular ~~kits~~antibody is present in the ~~immunofluorescence~~patient's ~~format~~blood, the RBCs will agglutinate, which prevents the RBCs from settling to the bottom of the well. Instead of the small red dot, the substance will appear a diffuse red, which indicates a positive reaction.

~~Hemagen’s~~Current ~~immunofluorescence products are used to aid in the diagnosis of the following diseases:~~ Products

~~Cytomegalovirus~~Analystâ ~~Herpes~~System simplex SLE (Lupus) German Measles Connective Tissue Diseases Chicken Pox Primary Bilary Cirrhosis Epstein-Barr virus (Mononucleosis) Toxoplasmosis Chlamydia Syphilis Measles RSV Mumps Autoimmune DiseasesProducts

6Hemagen currently markets four FDA 510(k) cleared rotor types for use on the Analyst® clinical chemistry analyzer, two general chemistry rotors, a glucose test and a lipid screen test. In addition, Hemagen sells four rotors specifically designed for the veterinary marketplace: VET-16, VetFlex7, VetFlex and T4 rotors.

~~Table~~Immunofluorescence ofor ~~Contents~~“IFA” Products

~~ELISA~~Hemagen's ~~Assays~~immunofluorescence products consist primarily of diagnostic assays for infectious diseases and several products for autoimmune diseases. Immunofluorescence kits are used as primary or confirmatory tests in many large clinical laboratories worldwide. Hemagen currently sells 15 kits in the immunofluorescence format.

Hemagen's ~~develops, manufactures and markets ELISA test kits for the detection of disease. Along with the~~ immunofluorescence ~~and hemagglutination~~products assays, Hemagen’s ELISA kits test for specific antibodies. The quantitative or semi-quantitative test results give useful information about the stage and prevalence of a particular disease. ELISA tests are ~~widely~~ used ~~by large laboratories, due~~ to ~~their~~aid ~~ready adaptability to automation and high volume testing. Hemagen’s autoimmune and infectious disease ELISA kits are used~~ in the diagnosis of the following diseases:

Systemic Lupus Erythematous (Lupus)		Rheumatoid Arthritis
Scleroderma		Sjögren’s Syndrome
Glomerulonephritis		Mixed Connective Tissue Disease
Polymyositis		Dermatomyositis
Primary Biliary Cirrhosis		Wegener’s Granulomatosis
Systemic Vasculitides		Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome
Venous and Arterial Thromboses		Thrombocytopenia
Recurrent Abortion		Toxoplasmosis
Rubella (German Measles)		Cytomegalovirus Infections
Herpes simplex 1 & 2 Infections		Chagas Disease
Varicella Zoster Infections (Chicken Pox & Shingles)

Cytomegalovirus	Herpes simplex
SLE (Lupus)	German Measles
Connective Tissue Diseases	Chicken Pox
Primary Bilary Cirrhosis	Epstein-Barr virus (Mononucleosis)
Toxoplasmosis	Chlamydia
Syphilis	Measles
RSV	Mumps
	Autoimmune Diseases

~~Hemagen~~ELISA has also developed specialized assays for quantitative analysis of the acute phase markers, specifically, C-Reactive Protein and Serum Amyloid A. These are believed to be important in the detection and prediction of inflammatory events associated with several diseases, including Systemic Lupus, Rheumatoid Arthritis, and Myocardial Infarction. Assays

Hemagen ~~also~~develops, ~~offers~~manufactures ~~ELISA &~~and ~~Hemagglutination~~markets ~~screening~~ELISA ~~assays,~~test ~~capable~~kits offor ~~verifying~~ the ~~presence~~detection of ~~as many~~disease. Along aswith ~~six~~the ~~analytes~~immunofluorescence inand ahemagglutination ~~single~~assays, ~~test.~~Hemagen’s ~~This~~ELISA iskits atest ~~useful~~for ~~tool~~specific inantibodies. The aquantitative ~~patient’s~~or ~~initial~~semi-quantitative ~~assessment.~~test ~~For~~results ~~example,~~give ifuseful aninformation ~~individual’s~~about ~~autoimmune~~the ~~screen~~stage 6and ~~test~~prevalence isof ~~positive,~~a ~~individual~~particular ~~marker~~disease. ELISA ~~kits~~tests are ~~then~~widely used toby ~~differentially~~large ~~diagnose~~laboratories, ~~the particular~~due ~~rheumatoid~~to ~~disease.~~their Toready ~~better~~adaptability ~~serve~~to ~~customers’~~automation ~~needs,~~and ~~most~~high ofvolume ~~the~~testing. Hemagen’s ~~reagents~~autoimmune ~~for~~and ~~these~~infectious disease ELISA kits are ~~offered~~used in ~~both~~the ~~lyophilized~~diagnosis ~~and~~of ~~liquid-stable~~the ~~formats.~~following diseases:

Hemagglutination Assays

Systemic Lupus Erythematous (Lupus)	Rheumatoid Arthritis
Scleroderma	Sjögren's Syndrome
Glomerulonephritis	Mixed Connective Tissue Disease
Polymyositis	Dermatomyositis
Primary Biliary Cirrhosis	Wegener’s Granulomatosis
Systemic Vasculitides	Anti-Phospholipid Syndrome
Venous and Arterial Thromboses	Thrombocytopenia
Recurrent Abortion	Toxoplasmosis
Rubella (German Measles)	Cytomegalovirus Infections
Herpes simplex 1 & 2 Infections	Chagas Disease
Varicella Zoster Infections (Chicken Pox & Shingles)

Hemagen’s hemagglutination assays are based on Hemagen’s proprietary technique to lyophilize, or “freeze dry,” the RBCs which form the central component of a hemagglutination assay. Hemagen’s proprietary lyophilization technique for the preservation of RBCs permits the production of standardized, easy-to-use and accurate hemagglutination tests with an extended shelf-life, most of which were previously unavailable using hemagglutination assays. The shelf-life of the lyophilized RBCs before reconstitution may be up to 48 months. A technician reconstitutes the powdered cells in a water-based solution prior to introducing to the patient’s serum. 6

~~Each~~Hemagen ~~hemagglutination~~has ~~test~~ also ~~requires~~developed aspecialized ~~specific~~assays ~~formula~~for toquantitative ~~sensitize~~analysis of the ~~RBCs~~acute ~~prior~~phase tomarkers, ~~lyophilization~~specifically, ~~such~~C-Reactive ~~that~~Protein ~~they~~and ~~will~~Serum ~~react~~Amyloid ~~to a specific antibody~~A. These ~~For~~are ~~each~~believed ofto ~~its~~be ~~tests,~~important ~~Hemagen~~in ~~uses~~the ~~a proprietary~~detection ~~formula~~and toprediction ~~combine~~of ~~antigens~~inflammatory ~~and~~events ~~other~~associated ~~reagents~~ with ~~RBCs~~several indiseases, aincluding ~~manner~~Systemic ~~that~~Lupus, ~~allows~~Rheumatoid ~~for standard~~Arthritis, ~~sensitive~~ and ~~specific~~Myocardial ~~agglutination reactions~~Infarction. ~~Results from Hemagen’s test kits are generally available within two hours. Hemagen’s hemagglutination test kits aid in the diagnosis of the following diseases:~~

~~SLE~~Hemagen ~~(Lupus)~~also ~~Dermatomyositis~~offers ~~Mixed~~ELISA ~~Connective~~& ~~Tissue~~Hemagglutination ~~Disease~~screening ~~Polymyositis~~assays, ~~Sjögren~~capable of verifying the presence of as many as six analytes in a single test. This is a useful tool in a patient’s ~~Syndrome~~initial ~~Rheumatoid~~assessment. For ~~Arthritis~~example, ~~Scleroderma~~if ~~(Systemic~~an ~~Sclerosis)~~individual’s ~~Chagas~~autoimmune screen 6 test is positive, individual marker kits are then used to differentially diagnose the particular rheumatoid disease. To better serve customers’ ~~Disease~~needs, most of the reagents for these kits are offered in both lyophilized and liquid-stable formats.

7Hemagglutination Assays

~~Table~~Hemagen's hemagglutination assays are based on Hemagen's proprietary technique to lyophilize, or "freeze dry," the RBCs which form the central component of ~~Contents~~a hemagglutination assay. Hemagen's proprietary lyophilization technique for the preservation of RBCs permits the production of standardized, easy-to-use and accurate hemagglutination tests with an extended shelf-life, most of which were previously unavailable using hemagglutination assays. The shelf-life of the lyophilized RBCs before reconstitution may be up to 48 months. A technician reconstitutes the powdered cells in a water-based solution prior to introducing to the patient's serum.

~~Distribution~~Each hemagglutination test also requires a specific formula to sensitize the RBCs prior to lyophilization such that they will react to a specific antibody. For each of its tests, Hemagen uses a proprietary formula to combine antigens and ~~Marketing~~other reagents with RBCs in a manner that allows for standard, sensitive and specific agglutination reactions. Results from Hemagen's test kits are generally available within two hours. Hemagen's hemagglutination test kits aid in the diagnosis of the following diseases:

~~General~~SLE (Lupus) Dermatomyositis Mixed Connective Tissue Disease Polymyositis Sjögren's Syndrome Rheumatoid Arthritis Scleroderma (Systemic Sclerosis) Chagas' Disease

InDistribution ~~the United States, Hemagen sells its products directly~~ and through distributors to clinical laboratories, hospitals, veterinary offices and research organizations, among other places. Internationally, Hemagen sells its products primarily through distributors and its wholly-owned subsidiary in Brazil. Hemagen grants both exclusive and non-exclusive distributorships, which generally cover limited geographic areas and specific test kits. Hemagen has relationships with over 30 distributors in various countries worldwide. Marketing

Hemagen markets its Virgo® product line in South America through its wholly owned subsidiary, Hemagen Diagnosticos Comerico, Importacao e Exportacao, Ltd. (“HDC”) in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Hemagen also engages numerous distributors throughout South America. HDC maintains a fully staffed sales, marketing and distribution force, warehouse and administrative office. In fiscal years 2010 and 2009, Hemagen derived product sales through HDC of $2,593,000 and $2,190,000 respectively, which represents 49% and 41% of Hemagen’s total sales from continuing operations, respectively. General

~~Products~~In ~~Under~~the ~~Development~~United States, Hemagen sells its products directly and through distributors to clinical laboratories, hospitals, veterinary offices and research organizations, among other places. Internationally, Hemagen sells its products primarily through distributors and its wholly-owned subsidiary in Brazil. Hemagen grants both exclusive and non-exclusive distributorships, which generally cover limited geographic areas and specific test kits. Hemagen has relationships with over 30 distributors in various countries worldwide.

Hemagen ~~spent~~markets ~~approximately~~its ~~$25~~Virgo® product line in South America through its wholly owned subsidiary,~~000~~ ~~and~~Hemagen ~~$92~~Diagnosticos Comerico,~~000 on~~ ~~research~~Importacao e Exportacao, Ltd. (“HDC”) in Sao Paulo, Brazil. Hemagen also engages numerous distributors throughout South America. HDC maintains a fully staffed sales, marketing and ~~development~~distribution ~~for~~force, ~~the~~warehouse and administrative office. In fiscal years ~~ended~~2011 ~~September 30,~~and 2010, Hemagen derived product sales through HDC of approximately $2,390,000 and ~~2009~~$2,593,000 respectively., which represents 46% and 50% of Hemagen’s total sales, respectively.

~~Research~~Products ~~and development~~Under ~~is focused on:~~ Development

•Hemagen ~~Activities~~spent ~~related~~approximately to$5,000 ~~upgrades to the Analyst® instrument~~ and ~~product~~$25,000 ~~offering~~on ~~such~~research ~~as evaluating~~ and ~~developing~~development ~~complimentary products~~ for ~~Hemagen’s~~the ~~Analyst®~~fiscal ~~product~~years ~~line~~ended toSeptember ~~distribute~~30, to2011, ~~the veterinary market~~ and ~~alternative~~2010, ~~tests utilizing the Analyst®s’ rotor technology;~~respectively.

•The ~~Developing~~Company’s ~~new~~research ~~ELISA kits~~ and ~~enhancing~~development ~~existing~~efforts ~~ELISA~~are ~~kits;~~currently ~~and~~focused on:

•· ~~Developing~~Activities related to upgrades to the Analyst® instrument and ~~enhancing~~product ~~IFA~~offering ~~kits.~~such as evaluating and developing complimentary products for Hemagen’s Analyst® product line to distribute to the veterinary market and alternative tests utilizing the Analysts’® rotor technology;

~~Manufacturing and Sources of Supply~~ 7

~~Hemagen manufactures~~· ~~its~~Developing ~~ELISA test kits, hemagglutination test kits, immunofluorescence test kits~~ and ~~Analyst®~~enhancing ~~and Endochek~~IFA consumables at its Columbia, Maryland facility. The Analyst® and the Endochek instruments are manufactured by third parties for Hemagen. Hemagen purchases many of the antigens and other reagents used in its kits ~~from outside vendors~~. Certain of these antigens and reagents are from single suppliers. The Company attempts to mitigate such risk from these single suppliers by maintaining an adequate supply of inventory and/or backup suppliers. If the products purchased from these single sources become unavailable there can be no assurances that the Company will be able to substitute a new supplier in a timely manner and thus this could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, and results of operations. Certain reagents used in Hemagen’s test kits are manufactured at Hemagen’s facilities. Hemagen uses lyophilization equipment to preserve sensitized red blood cells for its hemagglutination test kits. All of Hemagen’s products are manufactured under the Quality System Regulation as defined by the FDA.

~~Most~~Manufacturing ~~components~~and ~~used~~Sources inof Hemagen’s products are available from multiple sources. Certain raw materials that are used in the Analyst® rotors are manufactured for the Company pursuant to manufacturing agreements with other manufacturing companies that have been reliable vendors for the Company for many years. The Company continues to consider other potential vendors, including itself, or alternative vendors for manufacturing although there can be no assurances that we will be able to develop any new suppliers for these raw materials used in the Analyst® product line. Supply

8Hemagen manufactures its ELISA test kits, hemagglutination test kits, immunofluorescence test kits and Analyst® and Endochek consumables at its Columbia, Maryland facility. The Analyst® and the Endochek instruments are manufactured by third parties for Hemagen. Hemagen purchases many of the antigens and other reagents used in its kits from outside vendors. Certain of these antigens and reagents are from single suppliers. The Company attempts to mitigate such risk from these single suppliers by maintaining an adequate supply of inventory and/or backup suppliers. If the products purchased from these single sources become unavailable there can be no assurances that the Company will be able to substitute a new supplier in a timely manner and thus this could have a material adverse effect on the business, financial condition, and results of operations. Certain reagents used in Hemagen's test kits are manufactured at Hemagen's facilities. Hemagen uses lyophilization equipment to preserve sensitized red blood cells for its hemagglutination test kits. All of Hemagen's products are manufactured under the Quality System Regulation as defined by the FDA.

~~Table~~Most ofcomponents ~~Contents~~used in Hemagen’s products are available from multiple sources. Certain raw materials that are used in the Analyst® rotors are manufactured for the Company pursuant to manufacturing agreements with other manufacturing companies that have been vendors for the Company for many years. The Company continues to consider other potential vendors, including itself, or alternative vendors for manufacturing although there can be no assurances that we will be able to develop any new suppliers for these raw materials used in the Analyst® product line.

Government Regulation

Hemagen’'s manufacturing, distribution and marketing of diagnostic test kits is subject to a number of both domestic and international regulatory controls. In the United States, Hemagen’s production and marketing activities are subject to regulation by the U.S Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”), under the authority of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended.

These regulations require that Hemagen must formally notify the FDA of its intentions to market in vitro diagnostic devices through a regulatory submission process, either the 510(k) process or the Pre-market Approval (PMA) process. When a 510(k) process is used, Hemagen is required to demonstrate that the product is “substantially equivalent” to another product in commercial distribution. Under the 510(k) process, Hemagen cannot proceed with sales of its diagnostic products in the United States until it receives clearance from the FDA in the form of a substantial equivalency letter. Currently, the majority of products that are reviewed by the 510(k) process are cleared within 90 days. In certain cases, specifically for Class III devices, Hemagen must follow the PMA process which is lengthier and more burdensome.

Hemagen is registered with the FDA as a device manufacturer and to disclose its devices. Accordingly, Hemagen is subject to inspection on a routine basis for compliance with the FDA’'s Quality System Regulations. These regulations require that Hemagen manufacture its products and maintain its documents in a prescribed manner with respect to design, manufacturing, testing, process control and distribution activities. In addition, Hemagen is required to comply with various FDA requirements for labeling, pursuant to the applicable regulations. The most recent inspections by the FDA were in October 2010 for the Columbia, MD facility. The results of those inspections can be reviewed at www.fda.gov., the content of which is not incorporated herein. Finally, the FDA prohibits an approved device from being marketed for unapproved applications. Hemagen believes it is in compliance with all such regulations.

In January 2004, the Company received CE certification thereby allowing the Company to sell certain of its registered products in the European Community.

In October 2009, the Company received ISO 13485 certification in order to market additional products in the European Community and Canada. In October 2010 Hemagen was re-audited for the ISO and was recertified for 2011.

~~Competition~~ 8

The clinical diagnostic industry is highly competitive. There are many companies, both public and private, engaged in diagnostics-related sales, including a number of well-known pharmaceutical and chemical companies. Competition is based primarily on product reliability, customer service and price. Many of these companies have substantially greater capital resources and marketing and business organizations that are substantially greater in size than Hemagen. Many of these companies have also been working on immunodiagnostic reagents and products, including some products believed to be similar to those currently marketed or under development by Hemagen. Hemagen believes that its primary competitors in the market include Abaxis Inc., Bion, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Corgenix Medical Corporation, Diamedix Corporation, Heska Corporation, IDEXX Laboratories, Inc., Immco Diagnostics, INOVA Diagnostics, Inc., and Trinity Biotech Plc, among others. Hemagen expects competition within this industry to intensify.

~~Product~~The ~~Liability~~clinical diagnostic industry is highly competitive. There are many companies, both public and private, engaged in diagnostics-related sales, including a number of well-known pharmaceutical and chemical companies. Competition is based primarily on product reliability, customer service and price. Many of these companies have substantially greater capital resources and marketing and business organizations that are substantially greater in size than Hemagen. Many of these companies have also been working on immunodiagnostic reagents and products, including some products believed to be similar to those currently marketed or under development by Hemagen. Hemagen believes that its primary competitors in the market include Abaxis Inc., Bion, Bio-Rad Laboratories, Corgenix Medical Corporation, Diamedix Corporation, Heska Corporation, IDEXX Laboratories, Inc., Immco Diagnostics, INOVA Diagnostics, Inc., and Trinity Biotech PLC, among others. Hemagen expects competition within this industry to intensify.

~~The~~Product testing, marketing and sale of clinical diagnostic products entail an inherent risk of allegations of product liability, and there can be no assurance that product liability claims will not be asserted against Hemagen. Hemagen may incur product liability due to product failure or improper use of products by the user. Inaccurate detection may result in the failure to administer necessary therapeutic drugs or administration of unnecessary and potentially toxic drugs. Even with proper use of a product, there may be specific instances in Liability

9The testing, marketing and sale of clinical diagnostic products entail an inherent risk of allegations of product liability, and there can be no assurance that product liability claims will not be asserted against Hemagen. Hemagen may incur product liability due to product failure or improper use of products by the user. Inaccurate detection may result in the failure to administer necessary therapeutic drugs or administration of unnecessary and potentially toxic drugs. Even with proper use of a product, there may be specific instances in which the results obtained from Hemagen's test kits could lead a physician to predict the inappropriate therapy for a particular patient. Hemagen maintains product liability insurance in the amount of up to $2,000,000 per incident and in the aggregate which, based on Hemagen's experience and industry practice, Hemagen believes to be adequate for its present operations. No assurance can be given that Hemagen's insurance coverage is sufficient to fully insure against claims which may be made against Hemagen.

~~Table~~Patents ofand ~~Contents~~Proprietary Rights

~~which~~Hemagen ~~the~~protects ~~results~~its ~~obtained~~technology ~~from~~primarily ~~Hemagen’s~~as ~~test~~trade ~~kits~~secrets ~~could~~rather ~~lead~~than arelying ~~physician~~on topatents, ~~predict~~either ~~the~~because ~~inappropriate~~patent ~~therapy~~protection ~~for~~is anot ~~particular~~possible ~~patient.~~or, ~~Hemagen~~in ~~maintains~~management's ~~product~~opinion, ~~liability~~would ~~insurance~~be inless ~~the amount~~effective ofthan upmaintaining tosecrecy. In $2addition,~~000,000~~ ~~per~~Hemagen ~~incident~~relies ~~and~~upon inconfidentiality agreements with its employees. To the ~~aggregate~~extent ~~which,~~that ~~based~~it relies on ~~Hemagen’s~~confidentiality ~~experience~~agreements and ~~industry~~trade ~~practice~~secret protection, there can be no assurance that Hemagen's ~~believes~~efforts to maintain secrecy will be ~~adequate~~successful or that third parties will not be able to develop the technology independently. In the future, Hemagen may apply for patent protection for certain of its ~~present~~technologies ~~operations.~~if Nomanagement ~~assurance~~believes ~~can~~such protection would be ~~given~~beneficial ~~that~~to Hemagen’s. The ~~insurance coverage~~protection isafforded ~~sufficient~~by topatents ~~fully~~depends ~~insure~~upon ~~against~~a ~~claims~~variety of factors which may severely limit the value of the patent protection, particularly in foreign countries, and no assurance can be ~~made~~given ~~against~~that patents, if granted, will provide meaningful protection for Hemagen.'s technology.

~~Patents and Proprietary Rights~~ Employees

~~Hemagen~~As ~~protects~~of ~~its~~September ~~technology primarily as trade secrets rather than relying on patents~~30, ~~either because patent protection is not possible or~~2011, ~~in management’s opinion, would be less effective than maintaining secrecy. In addition,~~ Hemagen ~~relies~~had ~~upon~~twenty-eight ~~confidentiality~~full-time ~~agreements~~employees ~~with~~and ~~its~~three employees. Toworking ~~the extent that it relies~~ on ~~confidentiality~~a ~~agreements and~~contractual ~~trade secret protection, there can be no assurance that Hemagen’s efforts to maintain secrecy will be successful or that third parties will not be able to develop the technology independently~~basis. InThirteen ~~the~~employees ~~future,~~are ~~Hemagen~~in may apply for patent protection for certain of its technologies if management believes such protection would be beneficial to Hemagen. The protection afforded by patents depends upon a variety of factors which may severely limit the value of the patent protectionsales, ~~particularly~~ ~~in foreign countries~~marketing, general and noadministrative ~~assurance~~activities ~~can~~and beeighteen ~~given~~(including ~~that~~contractual ~~patents,~~personnel) ifare ~~granted,~~involved ~~will~~in ~~provide~~production ~~meaningful protection for Hemagen’s technology~~activities.

~~Employees~~None of Hemagen’s employees are represented by a labor organization and Hemagen is not a party to any collective bargaining agreement. Hemagen has never experienced any strike or work stoppage and considers its relationship with its employees to be good. However, Hemagen can give no assurances that the Company will not experience such strikes or work stoppages in the future, either of which could have a material effect on the Company's results of operations.

~~As of September~~ ~~30,~~Item ~~2010, Hemagen had twenty-three full-time employees and six employees working on a contractual basis~~1A. Risk ~~Seventeen employees are in sales, marketing, general and administrative activities and twelve (including contractual personnel) are involved in production activities~~Factors.

~~None~~Not ~~of Hemagen’s employees are represented by a labor organization and Hemagen is not a party to any collective bargaining agreement~~applicable. Hemagen has never experienced any strike or work stoppage and considers its relationship with its employees to be good. However, Hemagen can give no assurances that the Company will not experience such strikes or work stoppages in the future, either of which could have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations.

Item 1A1B. Unresolved ~~Risk~~Staff ~~Factors~~Comments.

Not applicable.

~~Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.~~9

~~Not~~Item ~~applicable~~2. Properties

~~Item~~Hemagen 2maintains its principal administrative office, laboratory and production operations in a 22,610 square foot leased facility in Columbia, Maryland. ~~Properties~~The Company plans to slightly reduce the space it utilizes in the Columbia, MD facility to 20,000 square feet by June 30,, 2012. Under the Columbia lease, which runs through June 30, 2012, Hemagen expects to pay approximately $207,538 (assuming 22,610 square feet leased through December 2011 and a subsequent reduction to 20,000 square feet) per year in rent for the upcoming fiscal year.

Hemagen ~~maintains~~'s ~~its~~subsidiary, ~~principal~~Hemagen ~~administrative~~Diagnosticos ~~office~~Comercio, ~~laboratory~~Importacao ~~and~~e ~~production~~Exportacao, ~~operations~~Ltd, inleases aapproximately 276,~~400~~000 square ~~foot~~feet ~~leased~~of ~~facility~~flexible office space in ~~Columbia~~Sao Paulo, ~~Maryland~~Brazil. The ~~Company~~lease, ~~plans~~which toexpired ~~reduce~~on ~~the~~June ~~space~~30, ~~it utilizes in the Columbia~~2006, MDhas ~~facility~~been toextended ~~20,100~~without ~~square~~a ~~feet by~~definitive ~~March 31,~~stated ~~2011~~term. Either ~~and~~party ~~has~~can ~~received~~terminate awith ~~commitment~~60 ~~from~~days ~~the~~notice. This ~~landlord~~subsidiary topaid ~~subsidize~~approximately $~~154~~101,~~400~~000 induring ~~the~~fiscal ~~form~~2011 ofin arent ~~tenant~~for ~~improvement~~this ~~allowance~~space. Management ~~Under~~is ~~the~~currently ~~Columbia~~seeking ~~lease,~~to ~~which~~relocate ~~runs~~to ~~through~~a ~~June 30,~~less ~~2012~~expensive, ~~Hemagen~~and ~~will~~more ~~pay~~efficient ~~approximately~~and ~~$234,000 (assuming~~effective ~~27,400 square feet leased) per year in rent for the upcoming fiscal year~~space.

~~Hemagen’s~~Management ~~subsidiary,~~believes ~~Hemagen Diagnosticos~~that ~~Comercio,~~all ~~Importacao e Exportacao, Ltd, leases approximately 6,000 square feet~~ of ~~flexible~~the ~~office~~properties ~~space~~are inadequately ~~Sao Paulo, Brazil~~insured. The lease, which expired on June 30, 2006, has been extended without a definitive stated term. Either party can terminate with 60 days notice. This subsidiary paid approximately $74,000 during fiscal 2010 in rent for this space. Management is currently seeking to relocate to a less expensive, and more efficient and effective space.

~~Management~~Item ~~believes that all of the properties are adequately insured~~3. Legal Proceedings.

10Not applicable.

~~Table~~Item of4. [Removed ~~Contents~~and Reserved]

~~Item~~PART ~~3. Legal Proceedings.~~II

~~Not applicable~~Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

~~Item~~Hemagen's 4.Common Stock has been traded on the over-the-counter bulletin board (~~Removed~~OTC-BB) market since March 3, 2003 under the symbol “HMGN.OB.” On December 5, 2011, the closing bid and ~~Reserved)~~ask price for the Common Stock as reported by the OTC-BB were $0.031 and $0.045 per share, respectively.

11For the periods indicated, the following table sets for the range of high and low bid prices for the Common Stock as reported by the OTC-BB during fiscal 2011 and 2010. These prices reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.

Fiscal 2011	High	Low
First Quarter	$0.07	$0.04
Second Quarter	$0.08	$0.06
Third Quarter	$0.08	$0.04
Fourth Quarter	$0.04	$0.03

Fiscal 2010
First Quarter	$0.11	$0.07
Second Quarter	$0.11	$0.05
Third Quarter	$0.10	$0.06
Fourth Quarter	$0.10	$0.06

~~PART~~As IIof October 31, 2011, there were 158 holders of record of Hemagen's Common Stock, which Hemagen believes represents approximately 1,233 beneficial owners.

~~Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.~~Dividends

Hemagen’s ~~Common Stock~~ has ~~been~~never ~~traded~~paid oncash ~~the~~dividends. Hemagen ~~over-the-counter~~currently ~~bulletin~~intends ~~board~~to ~~(OTC-BB)~~retain ~~market~~all ~~since~~future ~~March 3~~earnings, ~~2003~~if ~~under the symbol “HMGN.OB.” On November 30~~any, ~~2010,~~for ~~the~~use ~~closing~~in ~~bid~~its business and ~~ask~~does ~~price~~not ~~for~~anticipate ~~the~~paying ~~Common~~any ~~Stock~~cash asdividends ~~reported~~in by the ~~OTC-BB~~foreseeable ~~were $0~~future.~~04 and $0.10 per share, respectively.~~

For the periods indicated, the following table sets for the range of high and low bid prices for the Common Stock as reported by the OTC-BB during fiscal 2010 and 2009. These prices reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions. 10

	High		Low
Fiscal 2010
First Quarter	$	0.11	$	0.07
Second Quarter	$	0.11	$	0.05
Third Quarter	$	0.10	$	0.06
Fourth Quarter	$	0.10	$	0.06
Fiscal 2009
First Quarter	$	0.15	$	0.05
Second Quarter	$	0.15	$	0.06
Third Quarter	$	0.20	$	0.10
Fourth Quarter	$	0.16	$	0.07

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

As of November 9, 2010, there were 162 holders of record of Hemagen’s Common Stock, which Hemagen believes represents approximately 1,330 beneficial owners.

Period	(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased	(b) Average Price Paid per Share	(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(1)	(d) Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2)
July 1-31, 2011	27,056	$0.030	27,056	-
August 1-30, 2011	-	-	-	-
September 1-30, 2011	450	$0.030	450	-
Total	27,506	$0.030	27,506	-

~~Dividends~~(1) Represents shares of the Company’s Common Stock purchased pursuant to the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) that was established October 1, 2003 with no expiration. The purpose of the plan is not to repurchase, but rather it is an employee benefit plan.

~~Hemagen~~(2) ~~has~~There ~~never~~is ~~paid~~no ~~cash~~maximum ~~dividends.~~number ~~Hemagen~~of ~~currently~~shares ~~intends to~~that ~~retain~~may ~~all~~be ~~future~~purchases ~~earnings,~~under ifthe ~~any,~~Company’s ~~for~~Employee ~~use~~Stock inOwnership ~~its business and does not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.~~ Plan

~~Unregistered~~Item ~~Sales~~6. Selected ofFinancial ~~Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds~~ Data.

Period	(a) TotalNumberof SharesPurchased		(b)AveragePrice Paidper Share		(c) Total Number ofShares Purchasedas Part of PubliclyAnnounced Plans orPrograms(1)		(d)Maximum Number(or ApproximateDollar Value) ofShares that May YetBe Purchased Underthe Plans orPrograms(2)
July 1-31, 2010		13,130	$	0.098		13,130		—
August 1-30, 2010		9,422	$	0.100		9,422		—
September 1-30, 2010		16,120	$	0.090		16,120		—
Total		38,672	$	0.095		38,672		—

Not applicable

~~(1)~~Item ~~Represents shares of the Company’~~7. Management's ~~Common~~Discussion ~~Stock~~and ~~purchased~~Analysis ~~pursuant~~or ~~to the Company’s Employee Stock Ownership~~ Plan ~~(ESOP) that was established October 1, 2003 with no expiration. The purpose~~ of ~~the plan is not to repurchase, but rather it is an employee benefit plan~~Operation.

~~(2)~~Refer ~~There~~to is“Forward noLooking ~~maximum~~Statements” ~~number~~following ofthe ~~shares~~Index ~~that~~in ~~may be purchases under~~ the ~~Company’s~~front ~~Employee~~of ~~Stock~~this ~~Ownership~~Form ~~Plan~~10-K.

12 Overview

~~Table~~Revenues for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2011 were $5,141,227 compared to revenues for fiscal 2010 of ~~Contents~~$5,220,170; gross margin for fiscal 2011 was $1,960,797 compared to gross margin for fiscal 2010 of $2,356,205; and the net loss for fiscal 2011 was $880,476 compared to the net loss for fiscal 2010 of $156,314. The comprehensive loss for fiscal 2011 was $918,977 compared to comprehensive loss of $107,428 for fiscal 2010.

~~Item~~Historically, 6Hemagen has concentrated its efforts on developing, manufacturing and marketing medical diagnostic test kits used to aid in the diagnosis of certain diseases and for assessing general health conditions. Hemagen ~~Selected~~has ~~Financial~~approximately ~~Data~~60 different test kits available that are 510(K) cleared for sale in the United States by the FDA, and also sells other products that are not required to be FDA cleared.

~~Not~~Management ~~applicable~~has been working to take the appropriate actions to improve the management and operations of the Company while striving to achieve sustained profitability. There can be no assurance that any of the previously discussed actions management is taking will achieve the desired results. However, management believes that as a direct result of these actions, cash flow from operations, cash on hand at September 30, 2011 and its line of credit availability will be sufficient to finance its operations for fiscal 2012. See the “Recent Developments” section on page 3.

~~Item~~At 7.September ~~Management’s~~30, ~~Discussion~~2011, Hemagen had $213,611 of unrestricted cash, working capital of $923,610 and ~~Analysis~~a orcurrent ~~Plan~~ratio of ~~Operation~~1.61 to 1.0.

~~Refer~~Hemagen currently has a revolving senior secured line of credit with TiFunding, a related party, for the purpose of financing working capital needs as required. The line of credit currently provides for borrowings up to ~~“Forward~~$1,000,000 ~~Looking~~at ~~Statements”~~an ~~following~~annual interest rate of 9%. As of December 5, 2011, the ~~Index~~outstanding inbalance on the ~~front~~line was $719,426. The Company’s ability to borrow on the line is based on a borrowing base calculation dependent on certain receivables and inventory. The line of ~~this~~credit’s ~~Form~~maturity ~~10-K~~has been extended until October 1, 2012 and is renewable annually. The Company intends to renew the line when it expires. However, Hemagen can give no assurances that it will have sufficient cash to repay the line of credit if it is not renewed or to finance its operations.

~~Overview~~ 11

~~Revenues~~Off-Balance ~~from~~Sheet continuing operations for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010 were $5,220,170 compared to revenues for fiscal 2009 of $5,418,928; gross margin for fiscal 2010 was $2,356,205 compared to gross margin for fiscal 2009 of $2,072,386; and the net loss from continuing operations for fiscal 2010 was $156,314 compared to the net loss from continuing operations for fiscal 2009 of $729,949. Overall net loss for fiscal 2009, including discontinued operations, was $808,148. The comprehensive loss for fiscal 2010 was $107,428 compared to comprehensive loss of $739,030 for fiscal 2009. Arrangements

~~Historically,~~ Hemagen has ~~concentrated~~no ~~its~~off-balance ~~efforts~~sheet ~~on developing, manufacturing and marketing medical diagnostic test kits used to aid in the diagnosis of certain diseases and for assessing general health conditions~~arrangements. ~~Hemagen has approximately 60 different test kits available that are 510(K) cleared for sale in the United States by the FDA, and also sells other products that are not required to be FDA cleared.~~

~~Management~~Results ~~has been working to take the appropriate actions to improve the management and operations~~ of the Company while striving to achieve sustained profitability. There can be no assurance that any of the previously discussed actions management is taking will achieve the desired results. However, management believes that as a direct result of these actions, cash flow from operations, cash on hand at September 30, 2010 and its line of credit availability will be sufficient to finance its operations for fiscal 2011. See the “Recent Developments” section on page 3. Operations

AtFiscal ~~September 30,~~Year ~~2010,~~Ended ~~Hemagen~~September ~~had $151~~30,~~743~~ ~~of unrestricted~~2011 ~~cash,~~Compared ~~trade~~to ~~accounts~~Fiscal ~~receivable~~Year ~~(net)~~Ended ofSeptember ~~$669~~30,~~892,~~ ~~working capital of $1,601,979 and a current ratio of 2.37 to 1.0.~~ 2010

~~Hemagen~~For ~~currently~~fiscal ~~has~~2011, arevenues ~~revolving~~decreased ~~line~~by ofapproximately ~~credit with a bank for the purpose of financing working capital needs as required. The line of credit facility currently provides for borrowings up to~~ $~~500~~79,000~~, at~~ ~~an annual interest rate of the prime rate plus 3/4~~(2%) ~~with~~to anapproximately ~~interest floor of~~ $5~~.5%. The line of credit currently comes due on December 31~~,141,000 ~~2010.~~from ~~The~~approximately ~~Company expects the bank to renew the line at that time. As of December 17~~$5, ~~2010~~220,000 ~~the outstanding~~for ~~balance~~fiscal ~~owed~~2010. Approximately ~~on the line of credit was~~ $~~398~~38,000. ~~The~~of ~~availability~~this ondecrease ~~the~~was ~~line~~attributed isto ~~based~~lower onsales in the ~~borrowing~~Analyst® ~~base~~division ~~calculation~~during ~~which~~fiscal is2011 ~~made~~and ~~each~~a ~~month.~~decrease Asin ofsales ~~November 30,~~in ~~2010~~ the ~~maximum~~Virgo ~~borrowing on the~~ line asof ~~determined~~approximately ~~by the borrowing base calculation was~~ $~~425~~54,~~727~~000. ~~Notwithstanding the current availability on the line of credit, Hemagen can give no assurances that it will have sufficient cash flow to finance its operations.~~

~~Off-Balance~~Sales ~~Sheet~~of ~~Arrangements~~the Analyst® Clinical Chemistry Analyzer product line were approximately $38,000 lower in fiscal 2011 as compared to fiscal 2010. Consumable sales increased by approximately $36,000 during the current fiscal year but this increase was offset by a decrease in equipment sales of approximately $74,000 during the current year.

~~Hemagen~~Revenues ~~has~~from nothe ~~off-balance~~autoimmune ~~sheet~~and ~~arrangements~~infectious disease line decreased overall by approximately $54,000 during the current year to $3,497,000 in fiscal 2011 from $3,551,000 in fiscal 2010. This overall decrease was due to lower sales overall in the autoimmune and infections disease line. Sales in the local Brazilian currency were approximately R$160,000 less than that of the prior year but the stabilization of the Brazilian Real during the year resulted in only a decrease of approximately $29,000 dollars. The average exchange rates for the 12 month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010 were 1.65 and 1.78, respectively. Non-Brazil sales decreased by approximately $25,000 over the prior year.

~~Results~~Cost of ~~Operations~~product sales increased approximately $316,000 (11%) to approximately $3,180,000 in fiscal 2011 from approximately $2,864,000 in fiscal 2010. Gross margin decreased to 38% in fiscal 2011 as compared to a 45% gross margin in fiscal 2010. This decrease in gross margin is predominately attributable to an increase in raw material costs from one supplier who increased its prices for certain orders during the current year, as well as increases in outside consulting and payroll related expenses. The Company recently increased its prices on certain items to cover the increase in raw material costs and expects its margins to improve going forward.

~~Fiscal~~Selling, ~~Year~~general ~~Ended~~and ~~September 30~~administrative expenses increased by approximately $334,000 during fiscal 2011 to approximately $2,429,000 from approximately $2,095,000 in fiscal 2010. ~~Compared~~The Brazil operational expenses accounted for approximately $239,000 of this overall increase which included increases in travel, facility, audit and outside consulting service expenses as compared to ~~Fiscal~~the ~~Year~~prior ~~Ended~~year ~~September 30~~expenses. The Columbia Maryland operations contributed to the remaining $79,000 ~~2009~~of increased expense, which consisted mainly of increased expenses related to travel, facility and legal expenses.

~~For~~Research ~~fiscal~~and ~~2010,~~development ~~revenues~~expenses ~~from~~for ~~continuing~~fiscal ~~operations~~2011 decreased by approximately $~~199~~20,000 (380%) to approximately $5,~~220,~~000 from ~~approximately~~ $525,~~419,~~000 ~~for fiscal 2009. Approximately $352~~,~~000~~ ~~of this decrease was attributed to lower sales~~ in the ~~Analyst®~~previous ~~division~~year. ~~during~~The ~~fiscal~~decrease ~~2010~~is ~~which~~the ~~were~~result ~~offset~~of bythe anreduction ~~increase~~ in ~~overall sales in the Virgo division of approximately $189,000~~headcount.

13For fiscal 2011, Hemagen had a net operating loss of approximately $473,000 as compared to $236,000 of operating income in the previous fiscal year. This decrease of approximately $709,000 in operating income is the result of the combination of the decline in gross margins and the increase in selling, general and administrative expenses that occurred during fiscal 2011.

~~Table~~Net interest expense for fiscal year 2011 increased by approximately $74,000 to $406,000 in 2011 from $332,000 in the prior year. During the current fiscal year there was approximately $32,000 of ~~Contents~~increased interest expense related to the issuance of warrants that occurred when the line of credit was transferred in February 2011. There was also an increase of approximately $22,000 of interest expense related to the line of credit which was the result of carrying a higher outstanding balance during the year in conjunction with an increase in the annual rate. The annual rate changed from 5.5% to 9% in February of 2011 when the line was transferred. A decrease in interest income of approximately $17,000 was the result of the declining balance on the note receivable that also contributed to the overall change.

Sales of the Analyst® Clinical Chemistry Analyzer product line were approximately $144,000 lower in fiscal 2010 as compared to fiscal 2009. Consumable sales decreased by approximately $208,000 during the current fiscal year primarily due to the timing of sales of certain backordered products during the last quarter of the year and a loss of sales to certain customers. 12

~~Revenues~~In ~~from~~fiscal ~~the~~year ~~autoimmune~~2011, ~~and~~the ~~infectious~~Company ~~disease~~had ~~line increased by~~ approximately $~~189~~4,000 ~~during~~of ~~the~~income ~~current~~tax ~~year~~expense toas ~~$3,551,000~~compared ~~in fiscal~~to ~~2010 from~~ $390,~~362,~~000 in fiscal ~~2009~~year 2010. All ~~Approximately~~of ~~$403,000~~the ofincome ~~this~~tax ~~gain~~expense ~~was~~is related to ~~sales in Brazil whose revenues were positively impacted by~~ the ~~gain~~Company’s inBrazilian ~~the~~subsidiary ~~foreign currency translation~~ and ~~was~~represents ~~offset~~the bynet atax ~~decrease~~expense inafter ~~sales~~adjusting tothe ~~one customer~~benefit ~~during 2010~~ of ~~approximately~~loss ~~$200,000~~carry-forwards ~~which~~utilized ~~the~~according ~~Company expects~~ to ~~continue to supply in 2011. The average exchange rate during fiscal 2010 was 1.78 compared to 2.15 during fiscal 2009. Revenues in local~~ Brazilian ~~Reals~~tax ~~for fiscal 2010 fell approximately 9% over fiscal 2009 revenues~~law.

~~Cost~~Net ofloss ~~product~~for ~~sales~~fiscal ~~from~~year ~~continuing~~2011 ~~operations~~increased ~~decreased~~by approximately $~~483~~725,000 ~~(14%)~~ to ~~approximately~~ $2881,~~864,~~000 inas ~~fiscal~~compared ~~2010~~to ~~from~~a net loss of approximately $3156,~~347,~~000 in ~~fiscal~~the ~~2009.~~previous ~~Gross margin increased to 45% in~~ fiscal ~~2010 as compared to a 38% gross margin in fiscal 2009~~year. This increase in ~~gross~~net ~~margin~~loss is ~~due~~attributable to alower ~~decrease~~gross ~~in payroll~~margins, ~~related~~increases ~~expenses and a reduction~~ in ~~scrap~~overall ~~expense~~administrative ~~during~~expenses, ~~2010.~~and Inan ~~fiscal~~overall ~~2009~~increase ~~there was a one-time charge to scrap for obsolete inventory~~ in ~~the~~interest ~~amount of approximately $162,000~~expense.

~~Selling,~~Liquidity ~~general~~ and ~~administrative~~Capital expenses from continuing operations decreased by approximately $234,000 during fiscal 2010 to approximately $2,095,000 from approximately $2,329,000 in fiscal 2009. The decrease in overall expenses was attributable mainly to a decrease in travel and sales expenses during fiscal 2010 of approximately $97,000 and a decrease of approximately $217,000 of payroll related expenses which were offset by an overall increase in SG&A expenses of the Brazilian subsidiary that were mainly attributable to the currency fluctuations of the Brazilian Real. The average monthly exchange rate during fiscal 2010 was 1.78 compared to the average monthly exchange rate of 2.15 during fiscal 2009. Resources

~~Research~~At ~~and~~September ~~development expenses~~30, ~~from~~2011, ~~continuing~~Hemagen ~~operations~~had ~~for~~$213,611 ~~fiscal~~of ~~2010~~unrestricted ~~decreased~~cash, ~~approximately~~working capital of $67923,~~000~~610 ~~(72%)~~ and a current ratio of 1.61 to ~~approximately~~1.0. ~~$25,000~~At ~~from~~September ~~$92~~30,~~000~~ 2010, inHemagen ~~the~~had ~~previous~~$151,743 ~~year.~~of ~~The~~unrestricted ~~decrease~~cash, isworking ~~the~~capital ~~result~~ of ~~the~~$1,601,979 ~~reduction~~and ina ~~headcount~~current ratio of 2.37 to 1.0.

~~For~~Hemagen ~~fiscal~~currently ~~2010,~~has ~~Hemagen~~a ~~had~~revolving ~~operating~~senior ~~income~~secured ~~from~~line ~~continuing~~of ~~operations~~credit with TiFunding for the purpose of ~~approximately~~financing ~~$236,000~~working capital needs as ~~compared~~required. toThe aline of credit provides for borrowings up to $~~349~~1,000,000 ~~operating loss~~at inan ~~the~~annual ~~previous~~interest ~~fiscal~~rate ~~year~~of 9%. ~~This~~As ~~increase~~ of ~~approximately~~September ~~$585~~30,~~000~~ in2011 ~~operating~~and ~~income~~December is5, 2011, the ~~result~~outstanding ofbalance on the ~~increase~~line inwas ~~gross~~$669,413 ~~margins~~ and $719,426, respectively. The Company’s ability to borrow on the ~~lower~~line ~~expenses~~is ~~reported~~based ~~for~~on ~~fiscal~~a ~~2010~~borrowing base calculation dependent on certain receivables and inventory. The line of credit’s maturity has been extended to October 1, 2012, and is renewable annually. The Company intends to renew the line when it expires.

~~Net~~During ~~interest expense for~~ fiscal ~~year 2010 decreased by approximately $72~~2011,~~000~~ toHemagen ~~$332,000~~had incapital ~~2010~~expenditures ~~from~~of ~~$404,000 in the prior year since there was no amortization on the senior subordinated notes. Interest income was~~ approximately $2056,000, ~~less~~which ~~than~~included insome ~~fiscal~~leasehold ~~2009~~improvements ~~due to the declining balance on the note receivable~~ and ~~interest~~upgrades ~~expense~~to ~~was~~office ~~approximately~~furniture ~~$21,000 less due do the payoff of the Brazil notes during fiscal 2010~~ and ~~the lower balance carried on the line of credit throughout the current year~~equipment.

~~In the~~Cash ~~current~~used ~~fiscal~~by ~~year,~~operating ~~the~~activities ~~Company~~was ~~had~~ approximately $89337,000; ofcash ~~income~~provided ~~tax~~by ~~expense~~investing asactivities ~~compared~~was toapproximately $21156,000 inand ~~fiscal~~cash ~~year~~provided ~~2009.~~by ~~All~~financing ofactivities ~~the~~was ~~income~~approximately ~~tax~~$271,000. ~~expense~~The iseffect ~~related~~of toexchange ~~the~~rates ~~Company’s~~on ~~Brazilian~~cash ~~subsidiary~~in ~~and~~fiscal ~~represents~~year ~~the~~2011 ~~net~~resulted ~~tax~~in ~~expense after~~a ~~adjusting~~negative ~~the~~cash ~~benefit~~adjustment of ~~loss~~approximately ~~carry-forwards utilized according to Brazilian tax law~~$29,000.

~~There~~Hemagen ~~was~~believes nothat ~~net~~cash ~~loss~~flow ~~reported~~ from ~~discontinued~~ operations ofand ~~the~~cash ~~Raichem~~on ~~division~~hand ~~during~~at ~~fiscal~~September ~~2010~~30, ~~compared~~2011 towill ~~approximately~~be ~~$78,000~~sufficient ofto ~~net~~finance ~~loss~~its ~~was~~operations ~~reported~~for ~~during~~ fiscal ~~2009~~2012. However, ~~The~~Hemagen ~~net~~can ~~loss~~give ~~reported~~no ~~during~~assurances ~~fiscal~~that ~~2009~~it ~~was~~will have sufficient cash to repay the ~~result~~line of ~~the~~credit ~~final~~if ~~write-down~~it onis ~~the~~not ~~remaining inventory~~renewed ofor ~~Raichem.~~finance its operations.

~~Net~~Fiscal ~~loss~~2011 ~~for fiscal year 2010 decreased by approximately $652,000 to $156,000 of net loss~~ compared to ~~a net~~Fiscal ~~loss of approximately $808,000 in the previous year. This decrease was attributable to higher gross margins, lower expenses, and a reduction in the amortization of debt discount during~~ 2010 ~~as compared to 2009.~~

14Hemagen used approximately $337,000 of cash in its operating activities during fiscal 2011 compared to $183,000 of cash provided from its operating activities in fiscal 2010. The cash provided from the change in operating assets and liabilities was approximately $270,000 during fiscal 2011 compared to $197,000 of cash used during fiscal 2010. The largest portion of the change in operating assets and liabilities came from the decrease in prepaid expenses as compared to the prior year along with decreased accounts receivable and increased payables all which provided net cash for operating activities during the current year

~~Table~~Cash provided by investing activities totaled approximately $156,000 in fiscal 2011, as compared to approximately $177,000 provided in fiscal 2010. During fiscal 2011 there was a reduction in the outlay of ~~Contents~~cash for purchases of property and equipment of approximately $18,000, offset by less cash provided by the sale of Company assets of approximately $38,000.

~~Liquidity~~Cash provided by financing activities totaled approximately $271,000 in fiscal 2011 as compared to $31,000 used in financing activities in fiscal 2010. The cash utilized during the current year went toward funding the operations of the Company as compared to the cash used during fiscal 2010 which went toward paying down the Company’s line of credit and ~~Capital~~paying ~~Resources~~on the notes with Itau bank.

AtCritical ~~September 30,~~Accounting 2010, Hemagen had $151,743 of unrestricted cash, working capital of $1,601,979 and a current ratio of 2.37 to 1.0. At September 30, 2009 Hemagen had $156,314 of unrestricted cash, working capital of $1,370,200 and a current ratio of 1.95 to 1.0 Policies

~~Hemagen~~The ~~currently~~preparation ~~has~~of aconsolidated ~~revolving~~financial ~~line~~statements ofin ~~credit~~accordance with aU.S ~~bank~~generally ~~for~~accepted ~~the~~accounting ~~purpose~~principles ofrequires ~~financing~~us ~~working~~to ~~capital~~make ~~needs~~estimates asand ~~required.~~judgments ~~The~~with ~~line~~respect ~~of credit currently provides for borrowings up~~ to ~~$500,000,~~the atselection ~~an annual~~and ~~interest~~application ~~rate~~ of ~~the~~accounting ~~prime~~policies ~~rate~~that ~~plus~~affect ~~3/4%~~the ~~with~~reporting ~~an interest rate floor~~ of ~~5.5%.~~amounts As of ~~September 30~~assets, ~~2010 and December 18~~liabilities, ~~2010,~~revenues ~~there~~and ~~was $398~~expenses,~~000~~ ~~outstanding~~and on the ~~line.~~disclosures ~~The~~of ~~company’s~~contingent ~~ability~~assets toand ~~borrow~~liabilities. onWe ~~the~~base ~~line~~our isestimates ~~based~~ on a ~~borrowing~~historical ~~base~~experience ~~calculation dependent upon domestic receivables under 90 days~~ and ~~inventory.~~on Atvarious ~~November 30,~~other ~~2010,~~assumptions ~~the~~that ~~amount~~are ~~available~~believed to ~~Hemagen~~be toreasonable ~~borrow~~under ~~against~~ the ~~line~~circumstances, ~~based on~~ the ~~calculation~~results ~~was $425,727. The line~~ of ~~credit~~which ~~comes~~form ~~due on December 31, 2010 and~~ the ~~Company~~basis ~~intends~~for tomaking ~~renew~~judgments about the ~~line~~carrying ~~with~~values ~~the~~of ~~bank~~assets atand ~~that time~~liabilities. ~~However,~~Actual ~~Hemagen~~results ~~can~~may ~~give~~differ nofrom ~~assurances~~these ~~that~~estimates itunder ~~will~~different ~~have~~assumptions ~~sufficient cash to repay the line of credit if it is not renewed~~ or ~~finance its operations~~conditions. ~~Hemagen has no off-balance sheet financing arrangements.~~

~~During fiscal 2010, Hemagen had capital expenditures of approximately $74,000, which included some leasehold improvements and some upgrades to several pieces of equipment.~~ 13

~~Cash~~We ~~used by~~believe ~~operating~~the ~~activities~~following ~~was~~critical ~~approximately~~accounting ~~$183,000;~~policies ~~cash provided by investing activities was approximately $177,000~~ and ~~cash~~estimates ~~used~~have inthe ~~financing~~greatest ~~activities~~impact ~~was approximately $31,000. The effect of exchange rates~~ on ~~cash~~the inpreparation ~~fiscal year 2010 resulted in a positive cash adjustment~~ of ~~approximately~~our ~~$33,000.~~consolidated financial statements:

~~Hemagen~~Revenue believes that cash flow from operations and cash on hand at September 30, 2010 will be sufficient to finance its operations for fiscal 2011. The line of credit currently comes due on December 31, 2010, and the Company hopes to renew the line with the bank at that time. However, Hemagen can give no assurances that it will have sufficient cash to repay the line of credit if it is not renewed or finance its operations. Recognition

~~Fiscal~~The ~~2010 compared~~Company manufactures and markets a broad offering of in vitro diagnostic products and services which currently include: (1) reagents and consumables for general chemistry analyzers; (2) medical diagnostic test kits; (3) medical diagnostic instruments; and (4) maintenance services. Reagents and consumables, in addition to ~~Fiscal~~medical ~~2009~~test kits, represent the largest portion of our sales. Revenues from reagents and consumables and test kits are recognized when the product is shipped, all contractual obligations have been satisfied and it is reasonably assured that the resulting receivable is collectible.

~~Hemagen~~Instruments ~~used~~are ~~approximately~~usually ~~$183,000~~sold ofeither ~~cash~~directly into ~~its~~the ~~operating~~customer ~~activities~~or ~~during fiscal 2010 compared~~ to ~~$17,000~~a ofthird ~~cash~~party ~~provided~~financing ~~from~~entity ~~its~~that ~~operating activities~~ in ~~fiscal~~turn ~~2009.~~leases ~~The~~it ~~cash~~to ~~used from~~ the ~~change~~end incustomer. ~~operating~~Instrument ~~assets~~revenue ~~and~~is ~~liabilities~~recognized ~~was~~upon ~~approximately $196~~shipment,~~000~~ ~~during~~when ~~fiscal~~all ~~2010~~contractual ~~compared~~obligations tohave ~~$327,000~~been ofsatisfied ~~cash provided during fiscal 2009. A large portion of the change in operating assets~~ and ~~liabilities~~it ~~came~~is ~~from~~reasonably ~~the~~assured ~~decrease~~that ~~in inventory of approximately $302,000,~~ the ~~decrease~~resulting inreceivable ~~accounts~~is ~~payable of approximately $226,000 and the increase in prepaid expenses of approximately $ 218,000~~collectible.

~~Cash~~Revenues ~~provided~~under byproduct ~~investing~~service ~~activities totaled approximately $177~~contracts,~~000~~ inwhich ~~fiscal~~are ~~2010,~~generally asfor ~~compared~~one toyear ~~approximately $147~~or less,~~000~~ ~~provided~~are inrecognized ~~fiscal~~ratably ~~2009.~~over ~~The increase in net cash provided in fiscal 2010 was due to~~ the ~~reduced~~term ~~outlay~~ of ~~cash for~~ the ~~purchase~~contract, ofbased ~~property~~on ~~and~~the ~~equipment~~relative asfair ~~compared~~value toof the ~~prior year~~contracts.

~~Cash~~Accounts used in financing activities totaled approximately $31,000 in fiscal 2010 as compared to $223,000 used in fiscal 2009. The cash utilized during the current year and prior year, went to paying down the Itau bank notes, and payments to reduce the Company borrowings on the line of credit. The Itau bank notes were fully paid off as of September 30, 2010. Receivable

~~Critical~~The ~~Accounting~~majority ~~Policies~~of the Company’s accounts receivable is due from distributors (domestic and international), hospitals, universities, and physician and veterinary offices and other entities in the medical field. Credit is extended based on evaluation of customers’ financial condition and, generally, collateral is not required. Accounts receivable are most often due within 30 days and are stated at amounts due from customers net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Any accounts outstanding longer than the contractual payment terms are considered past due. We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts based on a number of factors, including the length of time the accounts receivable are past due, the Company’s previous loss history, the customer’s current ability to pay its obligation to the Company, and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. The Company writes off accounts receivable when they become uncollectible, and payments subsequently received on such receivables are credited to the allowance for doubtful accounts. Actual amounts collectible could vary from our estimates and affect our operating results.

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S generally accepted accounting principles requires us to make estimates and judgments with respect to the selection and application of accounting policies that affect the reporting of amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various Inventories

15Inventories are stated at the lower of cost as determined by the first-in, first-out method (“FIFO”) or market. Market for raw materials is based on replacement costs and, for other inventory classifications, on net realizable value. We regularly review inventory quantities on hand and record a provision for deterioration, excess and obsolete inventory based primarily on our estimated forecast of product demand and production requirements for the next 12 to 18 months, depending on the product. Several factors may influence the realizability of our inventories, including technological change and new product development. These factors could result in an increase in the amount of obsolete inventory on hand. Additionally, our estimates of future product demand may prove to be inaccurate, in which case we may have understated or overstated the provision required for excess and obsolete inventory. In the future, if we determine that our inventory was overvalued, we will be required to recognize such costs in cost of goods sold at the time of such determination. Although we make every effort to ensure the accuracy of our forecasts of future product demand, any significant unanticipated changes in demand or technological developments could have a significant impact on the value of our inventory and our reported operating results.

~~Table~~Recent ofAccounting ~~Contents~~Pronouncements

~~other~~The ~~assumptions~~Subsequent Events Topic of the FASB ASC establishes general standards of accounting for, and disclosure of, events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are ~~believed~~issued or are available to be ~~reasonable~~issued. ~~under~~This accounting standard sets forth the ~~circumstances,~~period after the ~~results~~balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements. This standard also sets forth the circumstances under which ~~form~~an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the ~~basis~~balance ~~for~~sheet ~~making~~date ~~judgments~~in its financial statements and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the ~~carrying~~balance ~~values~~sheet ofdate. ~~assets~~This ~~and~~accounting ~~liabilities~~standard is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. ~~Actual results~~In ~~may~~February ~~differ~~2010, ~~from~~the ~~these~~FASB ~~estimates~~issued ~~under~~ASU ~~different~~No. ~~assumptions~~2010-09 orwhich ~~conditions~~amended ASC 855. This amendment, which was effective upon issuance, removed the requirement for SEC registrants to disclose the date through which such registrants have evaluated subsequent events.

~~We believe the following critical accounting policies and estimates have the greatest impact on the preparation of our consolidated financial statements:~~ 14

~~Revenue~~ASU ~~Recognition~~No. 2010-28, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) - When to Perform Step 2 of the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts.” ASU 2010-28 modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist such as if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. ASU 2010-28 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2011 and did not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.

~~The~~In ~~Company~~May ~~manufactures~~2011, ~~and~~the ~~markets~~FASB aissued ~~broad~~new ~~offering~~guidance ofwhich inchanges ~~vitro~~the ~~diagnostic~~wording ~~products~~used ~~and~~to ~~services~~describe ~~which~~many ~~currently~~of ~~include:~~the ~~(1) reagents~~requirements ~~and~~in ~~consumables~~U.S. GAAP for ~~general~~measuring ~~chemistry~~fair ~~analyzers; (2) medical~~value ~~diagnostic~~and ~~test~~for ~~kits;~~disclosing ~~(3) medical~~information ~~diagnostic~~about ~~instruments;~~fair ~~and~~value ~~(4) maintenance~~measurements ~~services.~~to ~~Reagents~~ensure ~~and~~consistency ~~consumables,~~between inU.S. ~~addition~~GAAP toand ~~medical~~IFRS. This ~~test~~new ~~kits,~~guidance ~~represent~~also expands the ~~largest~~disclosures ~~portion~~for offair ~~our~~value ~~sales.~~measurements ~~Revenues~~that ~~from~~are ~~reagents~~estimated ~~and consumables~~using ~~and~~significant ~~test~~unobservable ~~kits~~(Level ~~are~~3) ~~recognized~~inputs. This ~~when~~new ~~the~~guidance ~~product~~ is ~~shipped,~~to ~~all~~be ~~contractual~~applied ~~obligations~~prospectively. ~~have~~The ~~been~~Company ~~satisfied~~anticipates ~~and~~that itthe isadoption ~~reasonably~~of ~~assured~~this ~~that~~standard in the ~~resulting~~first ~~receivable~~quarter isof ~~collectible.~~2012 will not materially expand its consolidated footnote disclosures.

~~Instruments~~In ~~are~~June ~~usually~~2011, ~~sold~~the ~~either~~FASB ~~directly~~issued new guidance which eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the ~~customer~~statement orof tochanges ain ~~third~~equity. This ~~party~~new ~~financing~~guidance ~~entity~~requires that all non-owner changes in ~~turn~~stockholders’ ~~leases~~equity itbe topresented ~~the~~in ~~end customer.~~either ~~Instrument~~a ~~revenue~~single iscontinuous ~~recognized~~statement ~~upon~~of ~~shipment,~~comprehensive ~~when~~income ~~all~~or ~~contractual~~in ~~obligations~~two ~~have~~separate ~~been~~but ~~satisfied~~consecutive ~~and~~statements. This itnew guidance is ~~reasonably~~to ~~assured~~be applied retrospectively. The Company anticipates that the ~~resulting~~adoption ~~receivable~~of isthis ~~collectible.~~standard in the first quarter of 2012 will not materially change the presentation of its consolidated financial statements.

~~Revenues~~Item ~~under~~7A. Quantitative ~~product~~and ~~service~~Qualitative ~~contracts,~~Disclosures ~~which~~about ~~are~~Market ~~generally for one year or less, are recognized ratably over the term of the contract, based on the relative fair value of the contracts~~Risk.

~~Accounts~~Not ~~Receivable~~ applicable.

~~The~~Item majority of the Company’s accounts receivable is due from distributors (domestic and international), hospitals, universities, and physician and veterinary offices and other entities in the medical field8. Financial ~~Credit is extended based on evaluation of customers’ financial condition and, generally, collateral is not required~~Statements. Accounts receivable are most often due within 30 days and are stated at amounts due from customers net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Any accounts outstanding longer than the contractual payment terms are considered past due. We maintain allowances for doubtful accounts based on a number of factors, including the length of time the accounts receivable are past due, the Company’s previous loss history, the customer’s current ability to pay its obligation to the Company, and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. The Company writes off accounts receivable when they become uncollectible, and payments subsequently received on such receivables are credited to the allowance for doubtful accounts. Actual amounts collectible could vary from our estimates and affect our operating results.

~~Inventories~~See Item 15 below and the Index therein for a listing of the financial statements and supplementary data filed as part of this report.

~~Inventories~~Item ~~are stated at the lower of cost as determined by the first-in, first-out system (“FIFO”) or market~~9. Changes Market for raw materials is based on replacement costs and, for other inventory classifications, on net realizable value. We regularly review inventory quantities on hand and record a provision for deterioration, excess and obsolete inventory based primarily on our estimated forecast of product demand and production requirements for the next 12 to 18 months, depending on the product. Several factors may influence the realizability of our inventories, including technological change and new product development. These factors could result in an increase in the amount of obsolete inventory on hand. Additionally, our estimates of future product demand may prove to be inaccurate, in which case we may have understated or overstated the provision required for excess and ~~obsolete~~Disagreements ~~inventory.~~with InAccountants the future, if we determine that our inventory was overvalued, we will be required to recognize such costs in cost of goods sold at the time of such determination. Although we make every effort to ensure the accuracy of our forecasts of future product demand, any significant unanticipated changes in demand or technological developments could have a significant impact on ~~the~~Accounting ~~value of our inventory~~ and ~~our~~Financial ~~reported operating results~~Disclosure.

16 None.

~~Table~~ Item of9A. Controls ~~Contents~~and Procedures.

~~Recent~~Management’s ~~Accounting~~Evaluation ~~Pronouncements~~of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The ~~Subsequent~~Company’s ~~Events~~Chief ~~Topic~~Executive ofOfficer, ~~the~~William ~~FASB~~P. ~~ASC establishes general standards of accounting for~~Hales, and ~~disclosure of, events that occur after~~ the ~~balance~~Company’s ~~sheet~~Principal ~~date~~Financial ~~but~~Officer, ~~before~~Catherine ~~financial statements are issued or are available to be issued~~M. ~~This~~Davidson, ~~accounting~~have ~~standard~~evaluated ~~sets forth~~ the ~~period~~effectiveness ~~after~~of the ~~balance~~design ~~sheet~~and ~~date~~operation ~~during which management~~ of athe ~~reporting~~Company’s ~~entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or~~ disclosure incontrols the financial statements. This standard also sets forth the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and ~~the~~procedures ~~disclosures~~as ~~that~~of anSeptember ~~entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This accounting standard is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15~~30, ~~2009. In~~ ~~February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No~~2011. ~~2010-09~~ Based ~~which~~upon ~~amended~~this ~~ASC 855. This amendment~~evaluation, ~~which~~these ~~was~~officers ~~effective~~believe ~~upon~~that ~~issuance, removed~~ the ~~requirement~~Company’s ~~for~~disclosure ~~SEC~~controls ~~registrants~~and toprocedures ~~disclose~~were ~~the~~effective ~~date~~as ~~through~~of ~~which~~September ~~such~~30, ~~registrants have evaluated subsequent events~~2011.

InManagement ~~October~~is ~~2009,~~aware ~~the~~that ~~FASB~~there ~~issued~~is ~~ASU~~a ~~2009-13,~~lack ~~Multiple~~of ~~Deliverable~~segregation ~~Revenue~~of ~~Arrangements, (“ASU~~duties ~~2009-13”),~~due ~~which applies~~ to ~~all~~the ~~deliverables~~small innumber ~~contractual~~of ~~arrangements~~employees inwithin ~~which~~the afinancial ~~vendor~~and ~~will~~administrative ~~perform~~functions ~~multiple~~of ~~revenue-generating~~the ~~activities~~Company. As Ina ~~April~~result ~~2010,~~of the ~~FASB~~limitations ~~issued~~of ~~ASU~~the ~~2010-17,~~resources ~~Revenue~~and ~~Recognition—Milestone Method,~~segregation ~~(“ASU~~of ~~2010-17”)~~duties, ~~which~~Stegman ~~defines a milestone~~ and ~~determines~~Company, ~~when~~the itCompany’s ~~may~~current beauditor ~~appropriate~~has toinformed ~~apply~~ the ~~milestone~~Company ~~method~~that ofthese ~~revenue~~limitations ~~recognition~~represent ~~for~~a ~~research~~material orweakness ~~development transactions. These pronouncements are codified~~ in ~~ASC~~internal ~~Topic 605,~~control ~~Revenue~~over ~~Recognition,~~financial ~~and~~reporting. Management will becontinue ~~effective~~to ~~for~~evaluate ~~our~~this ~~fiscal~~segregation ~~year~~of ~~that~~duties ~~begins January 1, 2011~~issue. ~~These~~The ~~pronouncements~~Company ~~may~~has beworked ~~applied~~over ~~prospectively~~the orpast ~~retrospectively,~~years and ~~early~~has ~~adoption~~documented isthese ~~permitted~~internal controls. WeThis ~~are~~material ~~evaluating~~weakness ~~the~~has ~~impact~~not ~~that~~been ~~adoption of ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2010-17 may have on our consolidated financial statements~~remediated.

ASU 2010-01, “Equity (Topic 505)—Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash.” ASU 2010-01 was issued in January 2010 and clarifies that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in earnings per share prospectively and is not a stock dividend. ASU 2010-01 is effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15~~, 2009, and should be applied on a retrospective basis. ASU 2010-01 had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.~~

~~ASU~~The ~~2010-06,~~internal ~~“Improving~~control ~~Disclosure~~report ~~about~~is ~~Fair~~included ~~Value Measurements,” was issued~~ in ~~January~~this ~~2010~~Annual ~~and~~Report ~~requires~~on ~~additional disclosures~~Form ~~regarding~~10-K ~~fair~~filed ~~value measurements~~herewith, ~~amends~~under ~~disclosures about post-retirement benefit plan assets and provides clarification regarding~~ the ~~level~~caption of“Management’s ~~disaggregation~~Report of fair value disclosures by investment class. The ASU is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for certain Level 3 activity disclosure requirements that will be effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2010. Adoption of ASU 2010-06 had no material impact on ~~our~~Internal ~~consolidated~~Control ~~financial~~over ~~statements.~~Financial Reporting.”

~~Item~~Changes ~~7A.~~in ~~Quantitative~~Internal ~~and~~Control ~~Qualitative~~Over ~~Disclosures~~Financial ~~about Market Risk.~~Reporting

~~Not~~There ~~applicable.~~has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation of internal controls that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, Hemagen’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 89B. Other ~~Financial Statements~~Information.

~~See~~Not ~~Item 15 below and the Index therein for a listing of the financial statements and supplementary data filed as part of this report~~applicable.

~~Item~~PART ~~9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.~~III

~~None.~~Executive Officers and Directors

17Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

~~Table~~The following table presents information regarding the Directors of ~~Contents~~the registrant.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Dr. Alan S. Cohen Director Since 1993 Term Expires 2012 Age: 85	Dr. Cohen has served as a Director of Hemagen since its inception. Dr. Cohen has been a Professor of Medicine at Boston University School of Medicine since 1968 and a Professor of Pharmacology since 1974. He is currently Distinguished Professor of Medicine (E). Dr. Cohen is Editor-in-Chief of AMYLOID. The Journal of Protein Folding Disorders. Dr. Cohen served as the Director of the Arthritis Center of Boston University from 1976 to 1994. From 1973 to 1992, Dr. Cohen served as Chief of Medicine of Boston City Hospital. Dr. Cohen is a past president of the American College of Rheumatology. Dr. Cohen received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Harvard College and his M.D. degree from the Boston University School of Medicine. Dr. Cohen’s extensive experience in the medical field, both as a practicing rheumatologist and in academic medicine and pharmacology, make him extremely knowledgeable about how the Company’s operations and products relate to the views of, and recent developments in the medical community, and render him a valuable member of the Company’s Board.
William P. Hales Director since 1999 Term Expires 2014 Age: 49	William P. Hales has been a Director of Hemagen and its President since October 1, 1999, and has served as Hemagen’s CEO since 2002. Mr. Hales has been the Chairman of the Board of Directors since February 2004. From 1991 to 1999 Mr. Hales was employed by several brokerage and investment banking firms. Prior to that, Mr. Hales spent six years in public accounting with Ernst & Whinney and Coopers & Lybrand advising clients on both audit and management consulting. Mr. Hales’ long-time service as the principal executive officer of the Company provides him with a unique perspective as the Company’s overall business strategy given its operating history and its future goals and objectives, which, through his position on the Board, he is able to communicate with the other Directors.
Edward T. Lutz Director since 2004 Term Expires 2013 Age: 65	Mr. Lutz has been the President and CEO of Lutz Advisors, Inc. since 2001. Prior to that Mr. Lutz served Tucker Anthony Sutro Capital Markets within the Investment Banking Group focusing on the bank and thrift industry. He has over thirty-five years experience in bank regulation, mergers and acquisitions of troubled financial institutions, strategic planning and structuring financial transactions. Over the last 13 years he has specialized in investment banking and consulting to bank and thrift institutions. Mr. Lutz was a member of the board of directors of Union State Bank (NYSE) and U.S.B Holding Bank which as sold to KeyBank in 2008. Mr. Lutz earned his B.A. in Economics from Hofsta University and his M.B.A in Finance from American University. As a result of Mr. Lutz’s prior experience serving on the boards of directors of multiple U.S. public companies and his financial expertise, he provides the Board with important guidance with respect to the complex financial and governance issues facing the Company as a result of being a public-traded company. Since October 2008, Mr. Lutz has been Vice Chairman and Director of Greater Hudson Bank, NA, a community bank located in Middletown, New York. He also serves as Chairman of that bank’s Audit Committee.

~~Management’s Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures~~ 16

The ~~Company’s~~executive ~~Chief~~officers ~~Executive~~as ~~Officer, William P. Hales, and the Company’s Principal Financial Officer, Catherine M. Davidson, have evaluated the effectiveness~~ of the ~~design~~date ~~and operation~~ of ~~the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2010. Based upon~~ this ~~evaluation, these officers believe that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2010.~~ report:

Management is aware that there is a lack of segregation of duties due to the small number of employees within the financial and administrative functions of the Company. As a result of the limitations of the resources and segregation of duties, Stegman and Company, the Company’s current auditor has informed the company that these limitations represent a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting. Management will continue to evaluate this segregation of duties issue. The Company has worked over the past year and has documented these internal controls. This material weakness has not been remediated.

Name	Age	Position
William P. Hales	49	Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
Catherine M. Davidson (a)	46	Controller, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer

~~The~~(a) ~~internal~~On ~~control~~July ~~report~~11, is2007 ~~included~~Catherine inDavidson ~~this~~was ~~Annual Report~~appointed onas ~~Form~~the ~~10-K~~Company’s ~~filed~~Principal ~~herewith,~~Financial ~~under~~Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. For the ~~caption~~five ~~“Management’s~~years ~~Report~~prior onto ~~Internal~~joining ~~Control~~Hemagen, ~~over~~Ms. Davidson served as the Chief Financial ~~Reporting~~Officer of Pepco Building Services, Inc.”, overseeing the finance and accounting functions of that company and its subsidiaries.

~~Changes~~Our inDirectors ~~Internal~~will ~~Control~~serve ~~Over~~until ~~Financial~~the ~~Reporting~~next annual meeting of stockholders. Our executive officers are appointed by our Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

~~There~~Audit has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation of internal controls that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to affect, Hemagen’s internal control over financial reporting. Committee

~~Item~~The 9BAudit Committee is comprised of, Edward T. ~~Other~~Lutz, ~~Information~~(Chairman) and William P. Hales. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Lutz meets the standards for independence provided under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. All members meet standards of financial literacy. The Board has also determined that Mr. Lutz qualifies as an audit committee financial expert as defined in regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

~~Not applicable.~~Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

18Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 requires Hemagen’s executive officers, Directors and persons who own more than 10% of a registered class of Hemagen’s equity securities to file reports of ownership and changes in ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Based on a review of reports received by it, and upon written representations from the reporting persons, Hemagen believes that during the last fiscal year, all of its executive officers, Directors and 10% shareholders complied with Section 16 reporting except that each of Messrs. Cohen and Lutz filed one late ownership report with respect to options granted for service as a director.

~~Table~~Code of ~~Contents~~Ethics

~~PART~~The ~~III~~Registrant has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all of our Directors, officers and employees. The Code of Ethics was filed with the Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, a copy of which is available to any person without charge upon request to the Secretary.

Item 11. Executive ~~Officers and Directors~~ Compensation

~~Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.~~17

~~The~~SUMMARY ~~following~~COMPENSATION ~~table presents information regarding the Directors of the registrant.~~ TABLE

Dr. Alan S. Cohen Director Since 1993 Term Expires 2012 Age: 84		Dr. Cohen has served as a Director of Hemagen since its inception. Dr. Cohen has been a Professor of Medicine at Boston University School of Medicine since 1968 and a Professor of Pharmacology since 1974. He is currently Distinguished Professor of Medicine (E). Dr. Cohen is Editor-in-Chief of AMYLOID. The Journal of Protein Folding Disorders. Dr. Cohen served as the Director of the Arthritis Center of Boston University from 1976 to 1994. From 1973 to 1992, Dr. Cohen served as Chief of Medicine of Boston City Hospital. Dr. Cohen is a past president of the American College of Rheumatology. Dr. Cohen received his Bachelor of Arts degree from Harvard College and his M.D. degree from the Boston University School of Medicine. Dr. Cohen’s extensive experience in the medical field, both as a practicing rheumatologist and in academic medicine and pharmacology, make him extremely knowledgeable about how the Company’s operations and products relate to the views of, and recent developments in the medical community, and render him a valuable member of the Company’s Board.
William P. Hales Director since 1999 Term Expires 2010 Age: 48		William P. Hales has been a Director of Hemagen and its President since October 1, 1999, and has served as Hemagen’s CEO since 2002. Mr. Hales has been the Chairman of the Board of Directors since February 2004. From 1991 to 1999 Mr. Hales was employed by several brokerage and investment banking firms. Prior to that, Mr. Hales spent six years in public accounting with Ernst & Young and Coopers & Lybrand advising clients on both audit and management consulting. Mr. Hales’ long-time service as the principal executive officer of the Company provides him with a unique perspective as the Company’s overall business strategy given its operating history and its future goals and objectives, which, through his position on the Board, he is able to communicate with the other Directors.
Edward T. Lutz Director since 2004 Term Expires 2010 Age: 64		Mr. Lutz has been the President and CEO of Lutz Advisors, Inc. since 2001. Prior to that Mr. Lutz served Tucker Anthony Sutro Capital Markets within the Investment Banking Group focusing on the bank and thrift industry. He has over thirty-five years experience in bank regulation, mergers and acquisitions of troubled financial institutions, strategic planning and structuring financial transactions. Over the last 13 years he has specialized in investment banking and consulting to bank and thrift institutions. Mr. Lutz was a member of the board of directors of Union State Bank (NYSE) and U.S.B Holding Bank which as sold to KeyBank in 2008. Mr. Lutz earned his B.A. in Economics from Hofsta University and his M.B.A in Finance from American University. As a result of Mr. Lutz’s prior experience serving on the boards of directors of multiple U.S. public companies and his financial expertise, he provides the Board with important guidance with respect to the complex financial and governance issues facing the Company as a result of being a public-traded company. Since October 2008, Mr. Lutz has been Vice Chairman and Director of Greater Hudson Bank, NA, a community bank located in Middletown, New York. He also serves as Chairman of that bank’s Audit Committee.

The following sets forth compensation paid, earned or awarded to the CEO and Principal Executive officer and the Principal Financial and Accounting Officer during the last two fiscal years ended September 30:

Name and Principal Position (a)	Year (b)	Salary ($) (c)	Bonus ($) (d)	Stock Awards ($) (e)	Option Awards ($) (f)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (g)	Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) (h)	All Other Compensation ($) (i)		Total ($) (j)
William P. Hales	2011 2010	172,500 172,500	— —	— —	-- 128,832	— —	— —	43,775 42,704	(1) (2)	216,275 344,036
Catherine M. Davidson	2011 2010	115,000 115,000	— —	— —	— —	— —		1,183 1,692	(3) (4)	116,183 116,962

(1)	Represents $31,800 in provision for housing, $10,200 for a car allowance and an estimated $1,775 for the Company’s contributions in the Employee Stock Ownership Plan for the plan year ending September 2011.
(2)	Represents $29,820 in provision for housing, $10,200 for a car allowance and $2,684 for the Company’s contributions in the Employee Stock Ownership Plan for the plan year ending September 2010.
(3)	Represents Company’s estimated contributions in the Employee Stock Ownership plan for plan year ending September 2011.
(4)	Represents Company’s contributions in the Employee Stock Ownership plan for plan year ending September 2010.

~~The~~OUTSTANDING ~~executive~~EQUITY ~~officers~~AWARDS asAT ofFISCAL ~~the date of this report:~~ YEAR-END

Name	Age	Position
Option Awards						Stock Awards
William P. Hales	48	Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer
Name (a)	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable (b)	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable (c)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) (d)	Option Exercise Price ($) (e)	Option Expiration Date (f)	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) (g)	Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) (h)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) (i)	Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested ($) (j)
Catherine M. Davidson(a)	45	Controller, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer
William P. Hales	250,000	—	—	.20	10/25/2015	—	—	—	—
	406,208	—	—	.19	03/04/2019	—	—	—	—
	616,667	1,233,333(1)	—	.11	05/27/2020	—	—	—	—
	85,000	—	—	.07	05/27/2020	—	—	—	—
Catherine M. Davidson	28,000 10,000	7,000 (2) —	— —	.22 .19	04/23/2012 01/10/2013	— —	— —	— —	— —

(a1) OnThese ~~July~~unexercisable ~~11,~~options ~~2007~~will ~~Catherine~~vest ~~Davidson was appointed~~ as the Company’s Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer. For the five years prior to joining Hemagen, Ms. Davidson served as the Chief Financial Officer of Pepco Building Services, Inc., overseeing the finance and accounting functions of that company and its subsidiaries.follows:

Our Directors will serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders. Our executive officers are appointed by our Board of Directors and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.

# OPTIONS	VESTING DATE
616,667	05/27/2012
616,666	05/27/2013

~~Audit~~(2) ~~Committee~~These unexercisable options will vest as follows:

The Audit Committee is comprised of, Edward T. Lutz, (Chairman) and William P. Hales. The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Lutz meets the standards for independence provided under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. All members meet standards of financial literacy. The Board has also determined that Mr. Lutz qualifies as an audit committee financial expert as defined in regulations adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

# OPTIONS	VESTING DATE
7,000	04/23/2012

~~Compliance~~Director ~~with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act~~ Compensation

~~Section 16~~Non-employee ofDirectors ~~the~~receive ~~Securities~~a ~~Exchange~~$2,500 ~~Act~~cash ofpayment ~~1934~~per ~~requires~~quarter ~~Hemagen’s~~and ~~executive~~receive ~~officers~~2,500 ~~Directors~~shares ~~and~~each ~~persons who~~quarter ~~own~~of ~~more~~the ~~than~~Company’s ~~10%~~common ofstock aas ~~registered~~compensation. Non-employee ~~class~~Directors of ~~Hemagen’s~~the ~~equity~~Company ~~securities~~are granted an option to ~~file~~purchase ~~reports~~10,000 shares of ~~ownership~~the ~~and~~Company’s ~~changes~~common instock ~~ownership~~at ~~with~~ the ~~Securities~~election ~~and~~of ~~Exchange~~their ~~Commission~~three-year term. In ~~Based~~addition, Non-employee Directors that serve on a ~~review~~committee or committees of ~~reports~~the ~~received~~Board byof ~~it,~~Directors ~~and~~are ~~upon~~granted ~~written representations~~an ~~from~~option ~~the~~to ~~reporting~~purchase ~~persons~~5,000 ~~Hemagen~~shares ~~believes~~of ~~that~~the ~~during~~Company’s ~~the~~common ~~last~~stock ~~fiscal~~at ~~year,~~the ~~all~~annual appointment of ~~its~~their ~~executive~~position. ~~officers,~~The ~~Directors~~following ~~and~~chart ~~10%~~shows ~~shareholders~~director ~~complied~~compensation ~~with~~for ~~Section 16~~the ~~reporting~~fiscal year ended September 30, 2011.

~~Code of Ethics~~ 18

The Registrant has adopted a Code of Ethics that applies to all of our Directors, officers and employees. The Code of Ethics was filed with the Registrant’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003, a copy of which is available to any person without charge upon request to the Secretary.

Name (a)	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($) (b)		Stock Awards ($) (c)		Option Awards ($) (d)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($) (e)		Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($) (f)		All Other Compensation ($) (g)		Total ($) (h)
Alan S.Cohen		10,000		425		--		--		--		--		10,425

Edward T. Lutz		10,000		425		--		--		--		--		10,425

~~Item~~The ~~11.~~following ~~Executive~~table ~~Compensation~~shows the aggregate number of shares of stock and options held as of September 30, 2011 for each director.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

NAME	# SHARES COMMON STOCK	# OPTIONS
ALAN S. COHEN	346,165	90,000
EDWARD T. LUTZ	186,526	80,000

~~The~~Item ~~following~~12. Security ~~sets~~Ownership ~~forth~~of ~~compensation~~Certain ~~paid,~~Beneficial ~~earned~~Owners orand ~~awarded~~Management ~~to the CEO~~ and ~~the~~Related ~~other~~Stockholders ~~most highly paid executive officers during the last two fiscal years ended September 30:~~ Matters.

Name and Principal Position(a)	Year(b)		Salary($)(c)		Bonus($)(d)		StockAwards($)(e)		OptionAwards($)(f)		Non-EquityIncentive PlanCompensation($)(g)		NonqualifiedDeferredCompensationEarnings($)(h)		All OtherCompensation($)(i)			Total($)(j)
William P. Hales		2010		172,500		—		—		128,832		—		—		41,420	(1)		342,752
		2009		172,500		—		—		37,852		—		—		40,592	(2)		250,944
Catherine M. Davidson		2010		115,000		—		—		—		—				900	(3)		115,900
		2009		115,000		—		—		—		—				2,625	(4)		117,625

Beneficial Ownership of Common Stock

~~(1)~~The ~~Represents~~following ~~$29,820~~table inreports ~~provision~~information ~~for~~regarding ~~housing~~the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of November 15, ~~$10~~2011,~~200~~ ~~for~~by aeach ~~car~~person ~~allowance~~or ~~and~~entity anknown ~~estimated~~by ~~$1,400~~us ~~for~~to be the ~~Company’s~~beneficial ~~contributions~~owner inof more than 5% of the ~~Employee~~outstanding ~~Stock~~shares ~~Ownership~~of ~~Plan~~common ~~for~~stock, ~~the~~each ~~plan~~of ~~year~~our ~~ending~~Directors ~~September~~and ~~2010~~named executive officers, and all of our Directors and executive officers as a group.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Owner		Percent of Class
William P. Hales President & CEO, Director 9033 Red Branch Rd. Columbia, MD 21045	10,184,959	(1)	41.8%

Jonathan E. Rothschild 1061-B Shary Circle Concord, CA 94518	1,133,021	(2)	7.3%

Dr. Alan Cohen Director 99 Florence Street Bldg 60, Unit4A Chestnut Hill, MA 02467	438,665	(3)	2.8%

Edward T. Lutz Director 6 West Sanders St. Greenlawn, NY 11740	269,026	(4)	1.7%

Catherine M. Davidson Controller, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer 9033 Red Branch Road Columbia, MD 21045	119,481	(5)	0.8%
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (4 persons)	11,012,131		44.8%

~~Table of Contents~~19

(2) Represents $26,760 in provision for housing, $9,741 for a car allowance and $4,091 for the Company’s contributions in the Employee Stock Ownership Plan for the plan year ending September 2009.

(1)	Share ownership includes 1,357,875 shares issuable upon the exercise of options within 60 days, senior subordinated secured notes convertible into 2,527,000 shares of common stock within 60 days, warrants for 5,000,000 shares of common stock exercisable within 60 days and 161,334 shares in the employee ESOP plan as of the plan year ending September 30, 2010.
(2)	Information based upon Schedule 13G filed by Mr. Rothschild on January 20, 2005.
(3)	Includes 90,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of options within 60 days.
(4)	Includes 80,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of options within 60 days.
(5)	Share ownership includes 38,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of options within 60 days and 81,481 shares in the employee ESOP plan as of the plan year ending September 30, 2010.

~~(3)~~Securities ~~Represents~~Authorized ~~Company’s estimated contributions in the Employee Stock Ownership plan~~ for ~~plan~~Issuance ~~year~~under ~~ending~~Equity ~~September~~Compensation ~~2010.~~Plans

~~(4)~~The ~~Represents~~following ~~Company’s~~table ~~contributions~~sets inforth ~~the~~our ~~Employee~~Securities ~~Stock~~authorized ~~Ownership~~for ~~plan~~issuance ~~for~~under ~~plan~~our ~~year~~currently ~~ending~~effective ~~September~~Equity ~~2009~~Compensation Plans.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

Plan category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights	Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders	3,142,208(1)	$0.14	398,792(2)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders	-----	-----	-----
Total	3,142,208(1)	$0.14	398,792(2)

Option Awards												Stock Awards
Name(a)	Number ofSecuritiesUnderlyingUnexercisedOptions (#)Exercisable(b)		Number ofSecuritiesUnderlyingUnexercisedOptions (#)Unexercisable(c)			EquityIncentivePlanAwardsNumber ofSecuritiesUnderlyingUnexercisedUnearnedOptions (#)(d)		OptionExercisePrice($)(e)		OptionExpirationDate(f)		NumberofSharesor Unitsof StockThatHaveNotVested(#)(g)		MarketValueofSharesor Unitsof StockThatHaveNotVested($)(h)		EquityIncentivePlanAwards:NumberofUnearnedShares,Units orOtherRightsThatHave NotVested(#)(i)		EquityIncentivePlanAwards:Marketor PayoutValue ofUnearnedShares,Units orOtherRightsThatHave NotVested($)(j)
William P. Hales		250,000		—			—		.20		10/25/2015		—		—		—		—
		406,208		—			—		.19		03/04/2019		—		—		—		—
		—		1,850,000	(1)		—		.11		05/27/2020		—		—		—		—
		85,000		—			—		.07		05/27/2020		—		—		—		—
Catherine M. Davidson		21,000		14,000	(2)		—		.22		04/23/2012		—		—		—		—
		6,666		3,334	(3)		—		.19		01/10/2013		—		—		—		—

Amount includes 461,000 options for the purchase of common stock pursuant to the Company’s 2001 Stock Option Plan approved by the shareholders on February 27, 2001, 80,000 options for the purchase of common stock pursuant to the Company’s 2000 Directors’ Stock Option Plan approved by the shareholders on April 25, 2000, and 2,601,208 options for purchases of common stock pursuant to the Company’s 2007 Stock Option Plan approved by the shareholders on April 24, 2007 that have been issued as of September 30, 2011.

~~(1)~~2. ~~These~~Amount ~~unexercisable~~represents options ~~will~~for ~~vest~~the purchase of common stock approved by the shareholders pursuant to the Company’s 2007 Stock Option plan that have not been issued as ~~follows:~~of September 30, 2011.

# Options		Vesting Date
616,667		05/27/2011
616,667		05/27/2012
616,666		05/27/2013

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

~~(2)~~Related ~~These unexercisable options will vest as follows:~~Transactions

# Options		Vesting Date
7,000		04/23/2011
7,000		04/23/2012

William P. Hales, the Chairman of the Board of Directors and President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company owns $884,450 face value of the senior subordinated secured convertible notes due September 30, 2014. Refer to Note 10 for a description of the senior notes.

~~(3)~~On ~~These~~December ~~unexercisable~~31, ~~options~~2010, ~~will~~the ~~vest~~Company ashad ~~follows:~~a loan outstanding in the amount of $398,000 with Bay Bank, FSB. On February 7, 2011, TiFunding, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company owned by William P. Hales, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President, and his father, purchased the loan from Bay Bank, FSB for approximately $360,000 and agreed to provide a $1 million line of credit facility to the Company for the purpose of financing working capital needs. In connection with this credit facility, the Company issued to TiFunding warrants to purchase $1,000,000 in shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.20. Refer to Note 8 for a description of this line of credit.

# Options		Vesting Date
3,334		01/10/2011

Director Independence

21The Board of Directors affirmatively determines the independence of each director and nominee for election as a director based on the definition of independence contained in the NASDAQ rules and the applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Based on these standards, Edward T. Lutz and Dr. Alan S. Cohen, who comprise a majority of the Board of Directors, both qualify as “independent” directors.

~~Table~~Item of14. Principal ~~Contents~~Accountant Fees and Services.

~~Director~~Hemagen’s ~~Compensation~~independent public accountants are Stegman and Company. Stegman and Company has served in that capacity since fiscal year 2007. Aggregate fees billed to Hemagen in fiscal 2011 and 2010 by its principal accountants, Stegman and Company were:

Non-employee Directors receive a $2,500 cash payment per quarter and receive 2,500 shares each quarter of the Company’s common stock as compensation. Non-employee Directors of the Company are granted an option to purchase 10,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at the election of their three-year term. In addition, Non-employee Directors that serve on a committee or committees of the Board of Directors are granted an option to purchase 5,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at the annual appointment of their position. The following chart shows director compensation for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2010.20

Name (a)		FeesEarned orPaid inCash($)(b)		StockAwards($)(c)		OptionAwards($)(d)		Non-EquityIncentive PlanCompensation($)(e)		NonqualifiedDeferredCompensationEarnings($)(f)		All OtherCompensation($)(g)		Total($)(h)
	2011	2010
Alan S. Cohen			10,000		875		336		—		—		—		11,211
Audit fees and SAS 100 quarterly review fees	$52,493	$60,081
Edward T. Lutz			10,000		875		1,009		—		—		—		11,884
Audit – related fees	--	--
Tax fees	$ 6,500 (a)	$5,000 (a)
All other fees	--	--
	$58,993	$65,081

(a) The ~~following~~Audit ~~table shows~~Committee believes the ~~aggregate~~provision ~~number~~ of ~~shares~~these ofservices ~~stock~~is ~~and~~compatible ~~options~~with ~~held~~maintaining asthe ofprincipal ~~September 30,~~accountant’s ~~2010 for each director~~independence.

Name	# Shares Common Stock		# Options
Alan S. Cohen		321,321		85,000
Edward T. Lutz		161,682		75,000

Audit Fees. Audit services of Stegman and Company for fiscal 2011 and 2010 consisted of examination of the consolidated financial statements of the Company, quarterly reviews of the financial statements and services related to the filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

22Tax Fees. Tax fees included charges primarily related to the preparation of federal and state tax returns.

~~Table~~All ofOther ~~Contents~~Fees. Fees paid to Stegman and Company for services other than as described under “Audit Fees” and “Tax Fees” for the 2011 and 2010 fiscal years.

~~Item~~All 12of the services described above were approved by the Audit Committee. The ~~Security~~Audit ~~Ownership~~Committee ofhas ~~Certain~~not ~~Beneficial~~adopted ~~Owners~~formal pre-approval policies, but has the sole authority to engage the Company’s outside auditing and ~~Management~~tax preparation firms and ~~Related~~must ~~Stockholders~~approve ~~Matters~~all tax consulting and auditing arrangements with the independent accounting firm prior to the performance of any services. Approval for such services is evaluated during the Audit Committee meetings and must be documented by signature of an Audit Committee member on the engagement letter of the independent accounting firm.

~~Beneficial~~Item ~~Ownership~~15. Exhibits ofand ~~Common~~Financial ~~Stock~~Statement Schedules.

The following table reports information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of November 9, 2010, by each person or entity known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock, each of our Directors and named executive officers, and all of our Directors and executive officers as a group.

(a)(1) and (2) Financial Statements and Schedules	Page

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting	F-2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-3
Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2011 and 2010	F-4
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the years ended September 30, 2011, and 2010	F-6
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended
September 30, 2011 and 2010	F-7
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010	F-8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-9

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Natureof Beneficial Owner			Percent ofClass
William P. Hales President & CEO, Director 9033 Red Branch Rd. Columbia, MD 21045		1,995,072	(1)		12.1	%
Jonathan E. Rothschild 1061-B Shary Circle Concord, CA 94518		1,142,315	(2)		6.9	%
Dr. Alan Cohen Director 99 Florence Street Bldg 60, Unit 4A Chestnut Hill, MA 02467		408,821	(3)		2.5	%
Edward T. Lutz Director 6 West Sanders St. Greenlawn, NY 11740		239,182	(4)		1.4	%
Catherine M. Davidson Controller, Principal Financial and Accounting Officer 9033 Red Branch Road Columbia, MD 21045		83,491	(5)		0.5	%
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (4 persons)		2,726,566			16.5	%

(1a)(3) Exhibit ~~Share ownership includes 741,208 shares issuable upon the exercise of options within 60 days and 120,414 shares in the employee ESOP plan as of the plan year ending September 30, 2009~~List.

(2) Based on Mr. Rothchild’s shares owned as reported on stock ownership report as of April 29, 2010 record date.

Exhibit No.	Description of Exhibit
3.1	Restated Certificate of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 28, 2010.)
3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 29, 2010.)
4.1	Specimen Stock Certificate (Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Commission on February 10, 1999)
10.1	Description of the Lease for office space of HDC in Sao Paulo, Brazil (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005)
10.2	Form of 8% Senior Subordinated Secured Convertible Note due September 30, 2014 (Hemagen’s Schedule T-O filed with the Commission on September 1, 2009)
10.3	Second Amendment to the Lease between the Company and 9033 Red Branch Road, L.L.C. dated June 9, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen's Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000)
10.4	Second Restructuring Agreement between the Company and Dade Behring, Inc. dated November 9, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001)
10.5*	2000 Directors’ Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2008)
10.6*	2001 Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the Commission on January 29, 2001)
10.7	Line of Credit Financing Agreement between Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and Reagents Applications, Inc. and Bay National Bank dated September 26, 2002 (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002)
10.8*	Directors Rule 10b5-1 Stock Purchase Plan (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003)
10.9*	Hemagen Employee Stock Ownership Plan (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2004)
10.10*	Trust Agreement for the Hemagen Employee Stock Ownership Plan (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2004)
10.11	Quota Purchase and Sale Agreement and Non-Competition Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2004)
10.12*	2007 Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the Commission on March 21, 2007)
10.13	Third Amendment to the Lease between the Company and 9033 Red Branch Road, L.L.C. dated June 9, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 12, 2007)
10.14	Asset Purchase Agreement between Reagents Applications, Inc. and Cliniqa Corporation dated October 8, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 12, 2007)
10.15	Promissory Note between Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and Cliniqa Corporation dated October 8, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 12, 2007)
10.16	Inventory Purchase Agreement between Reagents Applications, Inc. and Cliniqa Corporation dated October 8, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 12, 2007)
10.17*	Executive Employment Agreement between Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and William P. Hales effective as of May 27, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 28, 2010.)
10.18	Ninth Modification to Loan and Security Agreement between the Company and TiFunding LLC (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010.)
10.19	Sixth Allonge to Promissory Note executed by the Company in favor of TiFunding LLC (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010.)
10.20	Warrant to Purchase Shares of Common Stock issued to TiFunding LLC (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended December 31, 2010.)
10.21	Seventh Allonge to Promissory Note executed by the Company in favor of TiFunding LLC dated December 23, 2011 (Filed herewith)
14	Code of Ethics Policy (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003)
23.1	Consent of Stegman and Company (Filed herewith)
31.1	Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (Filed herewith)
31.2	Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (Filed herewith)
32.1	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer (Filed herewith)
32.2	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer (Filed herewith)
101.INS	XBRL Instance
101.XSD	XBRL Schema
101.CAL	XBRL Calculation
101.DEF	XBRL Definition
101.LAB	XBRL Label
101.PRE	XBRL Presentation

~~(3)~~*Management ~~Includes~~compensatory ~~85,000 shares issuable upon the exercise of options within 60 days~~contracts.

~~(4)~~Hemagen ~~Includes~~will ~~75,000~~provide ~~shares~~shareholders ~~issuable~~with any exhibit upon the ~~exercise~~payment of ~~options~~a ~~within~~specified 60reasonable ~~days~~fee, which fee shall be limited to Hemagen’s reasonable expenses in furnishing such exhibit.

~~(5) Share ownership includes 27,667 shares issuable upon the exercise of options within 60 days and 55,824 shares in the employee ESOP plan as of the plan year ending September 30, 2009.~~22

23 SIGNATURES

~~Table~~In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of ~~Contents~~the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

~~Securities~~Date: ~~Authorized~~December ~~for~~23, ~~Issuance~~2011 ~~under~~HEMAGEN ~~Equity~~DIAGNOSTICS, ~~Compensation~~INC. ~~Plans~~By: /s/ William P. Hales William P. Hales, Chairman of the Board, President & Chief Executive Officer

~~The~~In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following ~~table~~persons ~~sets~~on ~~forth~~behalf ~~our~~of ~~Securities~~the ~~authorized~~registrant ~~for~~and ~~issuance~~in ~~under~~the ~~our~~capacities ~~currently~~and ~~effective~~on ~~Equity~~the ~~Compensation~~date ~~Plans~~indicated.

Plan category		Number of securities to beissued upon exercise ofoutstanding options,warrants and rights			Weighted-averageexercise price ofoutstanding options,warrants and rights		Number of securitiesremaining available for futureissuance under equitycompensation plans(excluding securitiesreflected in column (a))
Name	Capacity	Date
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders			2,932,208	(1)	$	0.15		1,067,792	(2)
/s/ William P. Hales William P. Hales	Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer	December 23, 2011
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders			—			—		—
/s/ Alan S. Cohen Alan S. Cohen	Director	December 23, 2011
Total			2,932,208	(1)	$	0.15		1,067,792	(2)
/s/ Edward T. Lutz Edward T. Lutz	Director	December 23, 2011
/s/ Catherine M. Davidson Catherine M. Davidson	Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer	December 23, 2011

(1) Amount includes 351,000 options for the purchase of common stock pursuant to the Company’s 2001 Stock Option Plan approved by the shareholders on February 27, 2001, 80,000 options for the purchase of common stock pursuant to the Company’s 2000 Directors’ Stock Option Plan approved by the shareholders on April 25, 2000, and 2,501,208 options for purchases of common stock pursuant to the Company’s 2007 Stock Option Plan approved by the shareholders on April 24, 2007 that have been issued as of September 30, 2010.23

(2) Amount represents options for the purchase of common stock approved by the shareholders pursuant to the Company’s 2001 Stock Option Plan and the 2007 Stock Option plan that have not been issued as of as of September 30, 2010.

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING	F-2

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM	F-3

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010	F-4

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010	F-6

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010	F-7

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2011 AND 2010	F-8

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	F-9

~~Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.~~F-1

~~Director~~Management’s ~~Independence~~Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The ~~Board~~Company’s ofmanagement ~~Directors~~is ~~affirmatively~~responsible ~~determines~~for ~~the independence~~establishing ofand ~~each~~maintaining ~~director~~adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and ~~nominee~~15d-15(f) ~~for~~of ~~election~~the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as aamended). ~~director~~The ~~based~~Company’s oninternal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the ~~definition~~maintenance of ~~independence~~records ~~contained~~that, in ~~the~~reasonable ~~NASDAQ~~detail, ~~rules~~accurately and fairly reflect the ~~applicable~~transactions ~~regulations~~and dispositions of assets of the ~~Securities~~Company; ~~and~~(ii) ~~Exchange~~provide ~~Commission.~~reasonable ~~Based~~assurance onthat ~~these~~transactions ~~standards,~~are ~~Edward~~recorded ~~T. Lutz~~as ~~and~~necessary ~~Dr. Alan S.~~to ~~Cohen,~~permit ~~who~~preparation ~~comprise~~of aconsolidated ~~majority~~financial statements in accordance with GAAP and that receipts and expenditures of the ~~Board~~Company are being made only in accordance with the authorizations of management and the Directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, ~~both~~use ~~qualify~~or asdisposition ~~“independent”~~of ~~directors.~~the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

~~Item~~Because ~~14.~~of ~~Principal~~its ~~Accountant~~inherent ~~Fees~~limitations, internal control over financial reporting can only provide reasonable, but not absolute assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and ~~Services~~presentation and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Further, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree or compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

~~Hemagen~~As required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002, management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s ~~independent~~internal ~~public~~control ~~accountants~~over ~~are~~financial ~~Stegman~~reporting ~~and~~as ~~Company.~~of September ~~Stegman~~30, ~~and~~2011. ~~Company~~Management’s ~~has~~assessment ~~served~~is based on the criteria established in ~~that~~the ~~capacity~~Internal ~~since~~Control ~~fiscal~~— ~~year~~Integrated ~~2007~~Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. ~~Aggregate~~ ~~fees~~In ~~billed~~assessing the internal controls, management is aware that there is a lack of segregation of duties due to ~~Hemagen~~the insmall ~~fiscal~~number ~~2010~~of employees within the financial and ~~2009~~ byadministrative ~~its~~functions ~~principal~~of ~~accountants~~the Company. As a result of the limitations of the resources and segregation of duties, ~~Stegman~~management acknowledges a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting. As a result, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2011, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting were: ineffective. This material weakness has not been remediated.

	2009			2010
Audit fees and SAS 100 quarterly review fees	$	57,456		$	60,081
Audit—related fees		—			—
Tax fees	$	7,000	(a)	$	5,000	(a)
All other fees		—			—
	$	64,456		$	65,081

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company's registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by the Company's registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management's report in this annual report.

~~(a)~~/s/ ~~The~~William ~~Audit~~P. ~~Committee~~Hales ~~believes~~William ~~the~~P. ~~provision~~Hales ofPresident ~~these~~and ~~services~~Chief isExecutive ~~compatible~~Officer ~~with~~December ~~maintaining~~23, ~~the~~2011 ~~principal accountant’~~/s/ ~~independence~~Catherine M. Davidson Catherine M. Davidson Principal Financial Officer December 23, 2011

Audit Fees. Audit services of Stegman and Company for fiscal 2010 and 2009 consisted of examination of the consolidated financial statements of the Company, quarterly reviews of the financial statements and services related to the filings made with the Securities and Exchange Commission. F-2

24REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

~~Table~~To the Board of ~~Contents~~Directors and Stockholders of

~~Tax~~Hemagen ~~Fees. Tax~~Diagnostics, ~~fees included charges primarily related to the preparation of federal and state tax returns~~Inc.

~~All~~We ~~Other~~have ~~Fees~~audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. ~~Stegman~~ and subsidiaries (the “Company”) ~~for~~as ~~services~~of ~~other~~September 30, ~~than~~2011 asand ~~described~~2010, ~~under “Audit~~and ~~Fees”~~the related consolidated statements of operations and ~~“Tax~~comprehensive ~~Fees”~~income, ~~for~~changes ~~the~~in ~~2010~~stockholders' deficit, and ~~2009~~cash ~~fiscal~~flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

~~All~~We ofconducted ~~the~~our ~~services~~audits ~~described~~in ~~above~~accordance ~~were approved~~with bythe standards of the ~~Audit~~Public ~~Committee~~Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). ~~The~~ Those ~~Audit~~standards ~~Committee~~require ~~has~~that ~~not~~we ~~adopted~~plan ~~formal~~and ~~pre-approval~~perform ~~policies,~~the ~~but~~audit ~~has~~to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the ~~sole~~consolidated ~~authority~~financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to ~~engage~~perform an audit of the Company’s ~~outside~~internal ~~auditing~~control ~~and~~over ~~tax~~financial ~~preparation~~reporting. Our ~~firms~~audit ~~and~~included ~~must~~consideration ~~approve~~of ~~all~~internal ~~tax~~control ~~consulting~~over ~~and auditing~~financial ~~arrangements~~reporting ~~with~~as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the ~~independent~~circumstances, ~~accounting~~but ~~firm~~not ~~prior~~for tothe purpose of expressing an opinion on the ~~performance~~effectiveness of ~~any~~the ~~services~~Company’s internal control over financial reporting. ~~Approval~~ Accordingly, ~~for~~we express no such ~~services~~opinion. An isaudit ~~evaluated~~also ~~during~~includes ~~the~~examining, ~~Audit~~on ~~Committee~~a ~~meetings~~test ~~and~~basis, ~~must~~evidence besupporting ~~documented~~the byamounts ~~signature~~and ofdisclosures anin ~~Audit~~the ~~Committee~~consolidated ~~member~~financial on statements, assessing the ~~engagement~~accounting ~~letter~~principles ofused and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the ~~independent~~overall ~~accounting~~financial ~~firm~~statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

~~Item~~In 15our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. ~~Exhibits~~and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2011 and ~~Financial~~2010, ~~Statement~~and ~~Schedules~~the results of its operations and cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

~~(a)(1)~~/s/ ~~and~~Stegman ~~(2) Financial Statements~~ and ~~Schedules~~ Company

	Page
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting		F-2
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-3
Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2010 and 2009		F-4
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the years ended September 30, 2010, and 2009		F-6
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended September 30, 2010 and 2009		F-7
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2010 and 2009		F-8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-9

Baltimore, Maryland

~~(a)(3)~~December ~~Exhibit~~20, ~~List.~~2011

Exhibit No.		Description of Exhibit
3.1		Restated Certificate of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 28, 2010.)
3.2		Amended and Restated Bylaws (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 29, 2010.)
4.1		Specimen Stock Certificate (Incorporated by reference to Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed with the Commission on February 10, 1999)
10.17		Description of the Lease for office space of HDC in Sao Paulo, Brazil (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2005)
10.29		Form of 8% Senior Subordinated Secured Convertible Note due September 30, 2014 (Hemagen’s Schedule T-O filed with the Commission on September 1, 2009)
10.30		Second Amendment to the Lease between the Company and 9033 Red Branch Road, L.L.C. dated June 9, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2000)
10.32		Second Restructuring Agreement between the Company and Dade Behring, Inc. dated November 9, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2001)
10.33*		2000 Directors’ Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2008)

F-3

25Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

~~Table~~CONSOLIDATED ofBALANCE ~~Contents~~SHEETS

Exhibit No.		Description of Exhibit
10.35*		2001 Stock Option Plan (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the Commission on January 29, 2001)
10.40		Line of Credit Financing Agreement between Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and Reagents Applications, Inc. and Bay National Bank dated September 26, 2002 (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2002)
10.42*		Directors Rule 10b5-1 Stock Purchase Plan (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003)
10.44*		Hemagen Employee Stock Ownership Plan (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2004)
10.45		Trust Agreement for the Hemagen Employee Stock Ownership Plan (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2004)
10.50		Quota Purchase and Sale Agreement and Non-Competition Agreement (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-KSB for the year ended September 30, 2004)
10.60		2007 Stock Incentive Plan (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Definitive Proxy Statement filed with the Commission on March 21, 2007)
10.65		Third Amendment to the Lease between the Company and 9033 Red Branch Road, L.L.C. dated June 9, 2000 (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 12, 2007)
10.70		Asset Purchase Agreement between Reagents Applications, Inc. and Cliniqa Corporation dated October 8, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 12, 2007)
10.75		Promissory Note between Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and Cliniqa Corporation dated October 8, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 12, 2007)
10.80		Inventory Purchase Agreement between Reagents Applications, Inc. and Cliniqa Corporation dated October 8, 2007 (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on October 12, 2007)
10.85		Executive Employment Agreement between Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and William P. Hales effective as of May 27, 2010 (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 8-K filed with the Commission on May 28, 2010.)
14		Code of Ethics Policy (Incorporated by reference to Hemagen’s Form 10-KSB for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003)
23.1		Consent of Stegman and Company (Filed herewith)
31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (Filed herewith)
31.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (Filed herewith)
32.1		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer (Filed herewith)
32.2		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer (Filed herewith)

As of September 30, 2011 and 2010

* Management compensatory contracts.

ASSETS	2011		2010

CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash	$	213,611	$	151,743
Accounts Receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $67,286 and $60,016 at September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively		580,240		669,892
Inventories, net		1,460,780		1,386,317
Current Portion of Note Receivable		35,000		210,000
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		159,493		352,534
Total current assets		2,449,124		2,770,486

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT; net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $6,431,680 and $6,297,906 at September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively		386,520		525,658

OTHER ASSETS:
Long term portion of Note Receivable		--		35,000
Other Assets		52,658		40,250
Total other assets		52,658		75,250

Total Assets	$	2,888,302	$	3,371,394

~~Hemagen will provide shareholders with any exhibit upon the payment of a specified reasonable fee, which fee shall be limited to Hemagen’s reasonable expenses in furnishing such exhibit.~~ F-4

26Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

~~Table~~CONSOLIDATED ofBALANCE ~~Contents~~SHEETS

~~SIGNATURES~~As of September 30, 2011 and 2010

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT	2011			2010

CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	818,875		$	743,170
Revolving line of credit		669,413			398,000
Deferred revenue		37,226			27,337
Total current liabilities		1,525,514			1,168,507

LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
Senior subordinated secured convertible notes		4,049,858			4,049,858
Total Long-Term Liabilities		4,049,858			4,049,858
Total liabilities		5,575,372			5,218,365

STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value - 1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued		--			--
Common stock, $0.01 par value – 45,000,000 shares authorized; 15,585,281 and 15,565,281 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively		155,852			155,652
Additional paid-in capital		23,038,217			22,959,539
Accumulated deficit		(25,770,916	)		(24,890,440	)
Less treasury stock at cost; 100,000 shares at September 30, 2011 and 2010		(89,636	)		(89,636	)
Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income - currency translation (loss) income		(20,587	)		17,914
Total stockholders’ deficit		(2,687,070	)		(1,846,971	)

Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit	$	2,888,302		$	3,371,394

F-5

InHemagen ~~accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934~~Diagnostics, ~~this~~Inc. ~~report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant~~ and ~~in the capacities and on the date indicated.~~ Subsidiaries

Name	Capacity	Date
/s/ WILLIAM P. HALES William P. Hales	Chairman of the Board, President and Chief Executive Officer	December 23, 2010
/s/ ALAN S. COHEN Alan S. Cohen	Director	December 23, 2010
/s/ EDWARD T. LUTZ Edward T. Lutz	Director	December 23, 2010
/s/ CATHERINE M. DAVIDSON Catherine M. Davidson	Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer	December 23, 2010

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

27For The Years Ended September 30, 2011 and 2010

	2011			2010
Net sales	$	5,141,226		$	5,220,170
Cost of sales		3,180,429			2,863,965
Gross Profit		1,960,797			2,356,205

Operating Expenses:
Selling, general and administrative		2,428,511			2,095,035
Research and development		5,003			25,224
Total operating expenses		2,433,514			2,120,259

Total operating income (loss)		(472,717	)		235,946

Other income (expense)
Interest expense, (net)		(406,563	)		(332,262	)
Gain on Sale of Assets		2,800			26,290
Other income		135			3,291

Total other expense		(403,628	)		(302,681	)

Net loss, before income taxes		(876,345	)		(66,735	)

Income tax expense (benefit)		(4,131	)		(89,579	)

Net (loss) income		(880,476	)		(156,314	)

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustment		(38,501	)		48,886
Other comprehensive income (loss)		(38,501	)		48,886

Comprehensive (loss) income	$	(918,977	)	$	(107,428	)

Net (loss) income per share – Basic	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.01	)
Net (loss) income per share – Diluted	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.01	)

Weighted average common shares used in the calculation of net (loss) income per share – Basic and Diluted		15,476,486			15,454,103

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING			F-2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM			F-3
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS:
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS AT SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009			F-4
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009			F-6
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009			F-7
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2010 AND 2009			F-8
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS			F-9

F-6

~~F-1~~ Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

~~Table~~CONSOLIDATED ofSTATEMENT ~~Contents~~OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

~~MANAGEMENT’S~~For ~~REPORT~~the Years ONEnded ~~INTERNAL~~September ~~CONTROL~~30, ~~OVER~~2011 ~~FINANCIAL REPORTING~~and 2010

The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets of the Company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with the authorizations of management and the Directors of the Company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the Consolidated Financial Statements.

	Common Stock Shares Par Value				Additional Paid in Capital		Accumulated Deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Treasury Stock Shares Cost						Total Stockholders’ Deficit
Balance as of October 1, 2009		15,345,281	$	153,452	$	22,919,932	$	(24,734,126	)	$	(30,972	)		(100,000	)	$	(89,636	)	$	(1,781,350	)
Net Loss		--		--		--		(156,314	)		--			--			--			(156,314	)
Foreign Exchange translation adjustment		--		--		--		--			48,886			--			--			48,886
Comprehensive loss																				(107,428	)

Stock Based Compensation		--		--		25,957		--			--			--			--			25,957
Shares issued for compensation		220,000		2,200		13,650														15,850
Balance at September 30, 2010		5,565,281	$	155,652	$	22,959,539	$	(24,890,440	)	$	17,914			(100,000	)	$	(89,636	)	$	(1,846,971	)

Net Loss								(880,476	)											(880,476	)
Foreign Exchange translation adjustment											(38,501	)								(38,501	)
Comprehensive loss																				(918,977	)

Stock Based Compensation						45,999														45,999
Amortization of interest expense - warrants						31,879														31,879
Shares issued for compensation		20,000		200		800														1,000
Balance at September 30, 2011		15,585,281	$	155,852	$	23,038,217	$	(25,770,916	)	$	(20,587	)		(100,000	)	$	(89,636	)	$	(2,687,070	)

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting can only provide reasonable, but not absolute assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation and may not prevent or detect misstatements. Further, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree or compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. F-7

~~As required~~Hemagen ~~by Section 404 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002~~Diagnostics, ~~management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2010~~Inc. Management’s assessment is based on the criteria established in the Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. In assessing the internal controls, management is aware that there is a lack of segregation of duties due to the small number of employees within the financial and ~~administrative~~Subsidiaries ~~functions~~CONSOLIDATED ofSTATEMENTS ~~the~~OF ~~Company.~~CASH AsFLOW aFor ~~result~~The ofYears ~~the~~Ended ~~limitations~~September ~~of the resources and segregation of duties~~30, ~~management~~2011 ~~acknowledges a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting. As a result, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer~~ and ~~Principal Financial Officer concluded that, as of September 30,~~ 2010~~, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting were ineffective. This material weakness has not been remediated.~~

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.


	2011			2010

Cash flows from operating activities
Net (loss) income	$	(880,476	)	$	(156,314	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		185,814			163,943
Non-cash interest expense - warrants		31,879			--
Stock based compensation		45,999			25,957
Shares issued for compensation		1,000			15,850
Bad debt expense		11,112			(9,724	)
Gain on the sale of assets		(2,800	)		(26,290	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		78,540			(30,148	)
Inventories		(74,463	)		302,026
Prepaid expenses and other assets		180,633			(218,021	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		75,705			(225,965	)
Deferred revenue		9,889			(24,493	)
Net cash used by operating activities		(337,168	)		(183,179	)

Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of property and equipment		(56,414	)		(74,142	)
Proceeds from the sale of assets		2,800			40,911
Payments received on Note Receivable		210,000			210,000
Net cash provided by investing activities		156,386			176,769

Cash flows from financing activities
Net borrowings (payments) on revolving line of credit		271,413			(2,000	)
Payments made on Itau Bank Note		--			(28,859	)
Net cash provided (used) by financing activities		271,413			(30,859	)

Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents		(28,763	)		32,698
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		61,868			(4,571	)
Cash, beginning of year		151,743			156,314
Cash, end of year	$	213,611		$	151,743

~~/s/ WILLIAM P. HALES William P. Hales President and Chief Executive Officer December 23, 2010 /s/ CATHERINE M. DAVIDSON Catherine M. Davidson Principal Financial Officer December 23, 2010~~F-8

~~F-2~~ Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

~~Table~~NOTES ofTO ~~Contents~~CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~REPORT~~For OFThe ~~INDEPENDENT~~Years ~~REGISTERED~~Ending ~~PUBLIC~~September ~~ACCOUNTING~~30, ~~FIRM~~ 2011 and 2010

ToNOTE ~~the~~1 ~~Board~~- ofNATURE ~~Directors~~OF ~~and Stockholders of~~ BUSINESS

Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. (the “Company”), a Delaware company, is a biotechnology company that develops, manufactures, and markets more than 68 FDA-cleared proprietary medical diagnostic test kits. Hemagen has two different product lines. The Virgo® product line consists of diagnostic test kits that are used to aid in the diagnosis of certain autoimmune and infectious diseases, using ELISA, Immunofluorescence, and hemagglutination technology. The Analystâ product line is an FDA-cleared benchtop clinical chemistry analyzer system, including consumables, that is used to measure important constituents in human and animal blood. In the United States, the Company sells its products through distributors and directly to physicians, veterinarians, clinical laboratories and blood banks and on a private-label basis through multinational distributors. Internationally, the Company sells its products primarily through distributors. The Company was incorporated in 1985 and became a public company in 1993.

WeNOTE ~~have~~2 ~~audited~~– ~~the~~FINANCIAL accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of September 30, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, changes in stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. CONDITION

WeAt ~~conducted~~September ~~our~~30, ~~audits~~2011, inHemagen ~~accordance~~had ~~with~~$213,611 ~~the~~of ~~standards~~unrestricted cash, working capital of ~~the~~$923,610 ~~Public~~and ~~Company~~a ~~Accounting~~current ~~Oversight~~ratio ~~Board~~of ~~(United~~1.61 ~~States)~~to 1.0. Hemagen ~~Those standards~~currently ~~require~~has ~~that~~a werevolving ~~plan~~senior ~~and~~secured ~~perform~~line ~~the~~of ~~audit~~credit towith ~~obtain~~TiFunding, ~~reasonable~~a ~~assurance~~related ~~about~~party, ~~whether~~for the ~~consolidated~~purpose ~~financial~~of ~~statements~~financing ~~are~~working ~~free~~capital ofneeds ~~material~~as ~~misstatement~~required. WeThe ~~were~~line ~~not~~of ~~engaged~~credit tocurrently ~~perform~~provides anfor ~~audit~~borrowings ofup ~~the~~to ~~Company’s~~$1,000,000 ~~internal~~at ~~control over~~an ~~financial~~annual ~~reporting.~~interest ~~Our~~rate ~~audit~~of ~~included~~9%. ~~consideration~~As of ~~internal~~December ~~control~~5, ~~over~~2011, ~~financial~~the ~~reporting~~outstanding asbalance aon ~~basis~~the ~~for~~line ~~designing~~was ~~audit~~$719,426. ~~procedures~~Hemagen believes that ~~are~~cash ~~appropriate~~flow infrom ~~the~~operations ~~circumstances~~and cash on hand at September 30, ~~but~~2011 ~~not~~will be sufficient to finance its operations for ~~the~~fiscal ~~purpose~~2012. ofThe ~~expressing~~Company’s anability ~~opinion~~to borrow on the ~~effectiveness~~ ofline ~~the~~is ~~Company’s~~based ~~internal~~on ~~control~~a ~~over~~borrowing ~~financial~~base ~~reporting.~~calculation ~~Accordingly,~~dependent weon ~~express~~certain noreceivables ~~such~~and ~~opinion~~inventory. AnThe ~~audit~~line ~~also~~of ~~includes~~credit’s ~~examining,~~maturity onhas abeen ~~test~~extended ~~basis~~and currently expires October 1, ~~evidence~~2012. ~~supporting~~The ~~the~~line ~~amounts~~is ~~and~~renewable ~~disclosures~~annually. inThe ~~the~~Company ~~consolidated~~intends ~~financial statements,~~to ~~assessing~~renew the ~~accounting~~line ~~principles~~when ~~used~~it ~~and~~expires. ~~significant~~However, ~~estimates~~Hemagen ~~made~~can bygive ~~management,~~no asassurances ~~well~~that asit ~~evaluating~~will ~~the~~have ~~overall~~sufficient ~~financial~~cash ~~statement~~to ~~presentation.~~repay Wethe ~~believe~~line ~~that~~of ~~our~~credit ~~audits~~if ~~provide~~it ais ~~reasonable~~not ~~basis~~renewed ~~for~~or ~~our~~to ~~opinion~~finance its operations. Hemagen has no off-balance sheet transactions.

InNOTE ~~our~~3 ~~opinion,~~- ~~the~~SUMMARY ~~consolidated~~OF ~~financial~~SIGNIFICANT ~~statements~~ACCOUNTING referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2010 and 2009, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. POLICIES

~~/s/~~Principles ~~Stegman~~of ~~and Company~~ Consolidation

~~Baltimore~~The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly owned subsidiary Hemagen Diagnostics Commercio, ~~Maryland~~Importaco & Exporataco, Ltd. ("HDC"). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

~~December 23,~~Use ~~2010~~ of Estimates

~~F-3~~ The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

~~Table~~Foreign ofCurrency ~~Contents~~Translation

~~Hemagen~~The ~~Diagnostics~~financial position and results of operations of HDC are measured using HDC's local currency, ~~Inc~~the Brazilian Real, as the functional currency. Revenues and ~~Subsidiaries~~expenses of HDC have been translated into U.S. dollars at average exchange rates prevailing during the year. Assets and liabilities have been translated at the rates of exchange on the balance sheet date. The resulting translation gain and loss adjustments are recorded directly as a separate component of stockholders' equity.

~~CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS~~ F-9

AsCash ~~of September 30, 2010 and 2009~~ Equivalents

	2010		2009
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS:
Cash	$	151,743	$	156,314
Accounts Receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $60,016 and $69,973 at September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively		669,892		630,020
Inventories, net		1,386,317		1,703,226
Current Portion of Note Receivable		210,000		210,000
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		352,534		120,464
Total current assets		2,770,486		2,820,024
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT; net of accumulated depreciation and amortization of $6,297,906 and $6,143,356 at September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively		525,658		599,008
OTHER ASSETS:
Long term portion of Note Receivable		35,000		245,000
Other Assets		40,250		54,300
Total other assets		75,250		299,300
Total Assets	$	3,371,394	$	3,718,332

The Company considers all investments with original maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. The Company may have amounts in cash accounts in excess of federally insured limits throughout the year.

~~The~~Accounts ~~accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements~~ Receivable

~~F-4~~ A majority of the Company’s accounts receivable are due from distributors (domestic and international), hospitals, universities, and physician and veterinary offices and other entities in the medical field. Credit is extended based on evaluation of a customer’s financial condition and, generally, collateral is not required. Accounts receivable are stated at amounts due from customers net of an allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts with outstanding balances for longer than the contractual payment terms are considered past due. The Company determines its allowance by considering a number of factors, including the length of time trade accounts receivable are past due, the Company’s previous loss history, the customer’s current ability to pay its obligation to the Company, and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a whole. The Company writes off accounts receivable when they become uncollectible, and payments subsequently received on such receivables are posted against the allowance for doubtful accounts. The balance of the allowance for doubtful accounts was $67,286 and $60,016 on September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The Company does not accrue interest on accounts receivable past due.

~~Table of Contents~~Inventories

~~Hemagen~~Inventories ~~Diagnostics~~are stated at the lower of standard cost, ~~Inc~~determined on the first-in, first-out basis, or market. Inventory reserves are established for obsolescence based on expiration dating of perishable products and ~~Subsidiaries~~excess levels of inventory on hand. The Company had $541,158 and $738,972 of inventory reserves as of September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

~~CONSOLIDATED~~Long-lived ~~BALANCE SHEETS~~ Assets

AsThe Company reviews the carrying values of ~~September 30~~its long-lived assets for possible impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. If the review indicates that long-lived assets are not recoverable (i.e., ~~2010~~the carrying amount is less than the future projected undiscounted cash flows), the carrying amount would be reduced to fair value and ~~2009~~a charge to income would be recorded. Hemagen did not have any long-lived assets whose balances needed to be reduced.

	2010			2009
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	743,170		$	969,135
Revolving line of credit		398,000			400,000
Deferred revenue		27,337			51,830
Note payable—Itaú Bank		—			28,859
Total current liabilities		1,168,507			1,449,824
LONG-TERM LIABILITIES:
Senior subordinated secured convertible notes		4,049,858			4,049,858
Total Long-Term Liabilities		4,049,858			4,049,858
Total liabilities		5,218,365			5,499,682
STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value—1,000,000 shares authorized; none issued		—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value—45,000,000 shares authorized; 15,565,281 and 15,345,281 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively		155,652			153,452
Additional paid-in capital		22,959,539			22,919,932
Accumulated deficit		(24,890,439	)		(24,734,125	)
Less treasury stock at cost; 100,000 shares at September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively		(89,637	)		(89,637	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss—currency translation loss		17,914			(30,972	)
Total stockholders’ deficit		(1,846,971	)		(1,781,350	)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit	$	3,371,394		$	3,718,332

Property and Equipment

~~The~~Property ~~accompanying~~and ~~notes~~equipment ~~are~~is anstated ~~integral~~at ~~part~~net book value. Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of ~~these~~the ~~financial~~related ~~statements~~assets, which range from 3 to 10 years. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.

~~F-5~~ Other Assets

~~Table~~Other assets, net at September 30, 2011 and 2010 consists of ~~Contents~~product registration certificates that are being amortized over their 5 year life, security deposits relating to the facilities that are being leased, and the long term portion of the Note Receivable.

~~Hemagen~~Income ~~Diagnostics, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~ Taxes

~~CONSOLIDATED~~The ~~STATEMENTS~~Company OFfollows ~~OPERATIONS~~the ~~AND~~liability ~~COMPREHENSIVE~~method ~~INCOME~~of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amount and the tax basis of assets and liabilities at each year-end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized. The provision for or benefit from income taxes is allocated based upon each subsidiary’s individual operations.

~~For The Years Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009~~ F-10

	2010			2009
Net sales	$	5,220,170		$	5,418,928
Cost of sales		2,863,965			3,346,542
Gross Profit		2,356,205			2,072,386
Operating Expenses:
Selling, general and administrative		2,095,035			2,328,946
Research and development		25,224			92,154
Total operating expenses		2,120,259			2,421,100
Total operating income (loss) from continuing operations		235,946			(348,714	)
Other income (expenses)
Interest expense, (net), including $70,595, of debt discount amortization for the period ending September 30, 2009		(332,262	)		(404,087	)
Gain on Sale of Assets		26,290			43,117
Other income (expense)		3,291			556
Total other expense		(302,681	)		(360,414	)
Net loss, before income taxes, from continuing operations		(66,735	)		(709,128	)
Income tax expense		(89,579	)		(20,821	)
Net loss, from continuing operations		(156,314	)		(729,949	)
(Loss) income, from Discontinued Operations		—			(78,199	)
Net (loss) income		(156,314	)		(808,148	)
Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:
Foreign currency translation adjustment		48,886			69,118
Other comprehensive income (loss)		48,886			69,118
Comprehensive (loss) income	$	(107,428	)	$	(739,030	)
Net (loss) per share, from continuing operations—Basic	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.05	)
Net (loss) per share, from continuing operations—Diluted	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.05	)
Net income (loss) per share, from discontinued operations—Basic	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.01	)
Net income (loss) per share, from discontinued operations—Diluted	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.01	)
Net income (loss) per share—Basic	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.05	)
Net income (loss) per share—Diluted	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.05	)
Weighted average common shares used in the calculation of net (loss) income per share—Basic		15,454,103			15,234,651
Weighted average common shares used in the calculation of net (loss) income per share—Diluted		15,454,103			15,234,651

Revenue Recognition

~~The~~Revenues ~~accompanying~~from ~~notes~~the sale of products are anrecognized ~~integral~~when ~~part~~1) product is shipped, 2) all contractual obligations have been satisfied, and 3) the collection of ~~these~~the ~~financial~~resulting ~~statements~~receivable is reasonably assured.

~~F-6~~ Revenues from product service contracts, which are based on their relative fair value, are recognized ratably over the term of the contract. Losses are provided for at the time that management determines that contract costs will exceed related revenues. The portion of product service contracts not complete at the balance sheet date is included in deferred revenue.

~~Table~~Stock- ofBased ~~Contents~~Compensation

~~Hemagen~~The ~~Diagnostics~~Company applies FASB ASC 718-10, ~~Inc~~Share-Based Payment, which requires companies to measure the cost of share-based awards based on the grant-date fair value of the award using an option pricing model and to recognize that cost over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of stock options granted and ~~Subsidiaries~~recognizes the compensation cost of share-based awards in its statement of operations using the straight-line method over the vesting period of the award, net of estimated forfeitures.

~~CONSOLIDATED~~The ~~STATEMENT~~use OFof ~~CHANGES~~the INBlack-Scholes ~~STOCKHOLDERS~~option pricing model to estimate the fair value of share-based awards requires that the Company make certain assumptions and estimates for required inputs to the model, including (i) the fair value of the Company’s ~~DEFICIT~~common stock at each grant date, (ii) the expected volatility of the Company’s common stock value, (iii) the expected life of the share-based award, (iv) the risk-free interest rate, and (v) the dividend yield. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option pricing model.

~~For~~Research ~~the Years Ended September 30, 2010~~ and ~~2009~~Development Costs

	Common Stock				AdditionalPaid inCapital		AccumulatedDeficit			AccumulatedOtherComprehensiveLoss			Treasury Stock						TotalStockholders’Deficit
	Shares		Par Value										Shares			Cost
Balance as of October 1, 2008		15,325,281	$	153,252	$	22,867,507	$	(23,925,977	)	$	(100,090	)		(100,000	)	$	(89,637	)	$	(1,094,945	)
Net Income		—		—		—		(808,148	)		—			—			—			(808,148	)
Foreign Exchange translation adjustment		—		—		—		—			69,118			—			—			69,118
Stock Based Compensation		—		—		51,075		—			—			—			—			51,075
Balance at September 30, 2009		15,345,281	$	153,452	$	22,919,932	$	(24,734,125	)	$	(30,972	)		(100,000	)	$	(89,637	)	$	(1,781,350	)
Net Loss								(156,314	)											(156,314	)
Foreign Exchange translation adjustment											48,886									48,886
Stock Based Compensation						25,957														25,957
Issuance of Common Stock		220,000		2,200		13,650														15,850
Balance at September 30, 2010		15,565,281	$	155,652	$	22,959,539	$	(24,890,440	)	$	17,914			(100,000	)	$	(89,637	)	$	(1,846,971	)

All costs incurred to research, design and develop products are considered research and development costs and are charged to expense as incurred.

~~The~~Fair ~~accompanying~~Value ~~notes are an integral part~~ of ~~these~~Financial ~~financial statements~~ Instruments

FFinancial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, short-7 term investments, customer receivables, accounts payable, certain other accrued liabilities and long-term debt. The carrying value of long-term debt approximates its fair value based on the current rate offered to the Company for debt of similar remaining maturities. The carrying values of all other financial instruments also approximate their fair values.

~~Table~~Advertising ~~of Contents~~Expenses

~~Hemagen~~Costs ~~Diagnostics~~of advertising, ~~Inc~~which also include promotional expenses, are expensed as incurred. Advertising expenses for fiscal 2011 and ~~Subsidiaries~~2010 were approximately $12,201 and $7,404, respectively.

~~CONSOLIDATED~~Shipping ~~STATEMENTS~~and ~~OF CASH FLOW~~ Handling

~~For~~ The ~~Years~~cost ~~Ended~~of ~~September 30,~~shipping ~~2010~~products to customers is included in cost of goods sold. Amounts billed to a customer in a sale transaction related to shipping and ~~2009~~handling are classified as revenue.

	2010			2009
Cash flows from operating activities
Net (loss) income	$	(156,314	)	$	(808,148	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities
Depreciation and amortization		163,943			156,736
Amortization of debt discount		—			70,595
Stock based compensation		41,807			52,625
Inventory obsolescence		—			228,199
Bad debt expense		(9,724	)		32,611
Gain on the sale of assets		(26,290	)		(43,117	)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(30,148	)		203,675
Inventories		302,026			105,624
Prepaid expenses and other assets		(218,021	)		227,332
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(225,965	)		(158,464	)
Deferred revenue		(24,493	)		(50,851	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		(183,179	)		16,817
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of property and equipment		(74,142	)		(114,888	)
Proceeds from the sale of assets		40,911			51,805
Payments received on Note Receivable		210,000			210,000
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities		176,769			146,917
Cash flows from financing activities
Net (payments) borrowings on revolving line of credit		(2,000	)		(100,000	)
Payments made on Itau Bank Note		(28,859	)		(122,864	)
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities		(30,859	)		(222,864	)
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents		32,698			116,645
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(4,571	)		57,515
Cash, beginning of year		156,314			98,799
Cash, end of year	$	151,743		$	156,314

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The ~~accompanying~~Subsequent ~~notes~~Events Topic of the FASB ASC establishes general standards of accounting for, and disclosure of, events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are anissued ~~integral~~or ~~part~~are available to be issued. This accounting standard sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of ~~these~~a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements. This standard also sets forth the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This accounting standard is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09 which amended ASC 855. This amendment, which was effective upon issuance, removed the requirement for SEC registrants to disclose the date through which such registrants have evaluated subsequent events.

F-8 11

~~Table~~ASU No. 2010-28, “Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350) - When to Perform Step 2 of ~~Contents~~the Goodwill Impairment Test for Reporting Units with Zero or Negative Carrying Amounts.” ASU 2010-28 modifies Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist such as if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. ASU 2010-28 became effective for the Company on January 1, 2011 and did not have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.

~~Hemagen~~In ~~Diagnostics~~May 2011, ~~Inc~~the FASB issued new guidance which changes the wording used to describe many of the requirements in U.S. GAAP for measuring fair value and ~~Subsidiaries~~for disclosing information about fair value measurements to ensure consistency between U.S. GAAP and IFRS. This new guidance also expands the disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable (Level 3) inputs. This new guidance is to be applied prospectively. The Company anticipates that the adoption of this standard in the first quarter of 2012 will not materially expand its consolidated footnote disclosures.

~~NOTES~~In TOJune ~~CONSOLIDATED~~2011, ~~FINANCIAL~~the ~~STATEMENTS~~FASB issued new guidance which eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in equity. This new guidance requires that all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented in either a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. This new guidance is to be applied retrospectively. The Company anticipates that the adoption of this standard in the first quarter of 2012 will not materially change the presentation of its consolidated financial statements.

~~For~~NOTE ~~The~~4 ~~Years~~– ~~Ending~~RELATED ~~September 30,~~PARTY ~~2010 and 2009~~ TRANSACTIONS

~~NOTE~~William ~~1—NATURE~~P. OFHales, ~~BUSINESS~~ the Chairman of the Board of Directors and President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company owns $884,450 face value of the senior subordinated secured convertible notes due September 30, 2014. Refer to Note 10 for a description of the senior notes.

~~Hemagen Diagnostics~~TiFunding, ~~Inc. (the “Company”)~~LLC, a Delaware ~~company,~~limited isliability ~~a biotechnology~~ company ~~that~~ ~~develops,~~owned ~~manufactures,~~by ~~and~~William ~~markets more than 68 FDA-cleared proprietary medical diagnostic test kits~~P. ~~Hemagen~~Hales, ~~has two different product lines. The Virgo® product line consists of diagnostic test kits that are used to aid in~~ the ~~diagnosis~~Company’s ofChief ~~certain~~Executive ~~autoimmune~~Officer and ~~infectious diseases~~President, ~~using ELISA, Immunofluorescence,~~ and ~~hemagglutination~~his ~~technology.~~father, ~~The~~provides ~~Analyst®~~a ~~product~~senior secured line isof ancredit ~~FDA-cleared~~facility ~~benchtop clinical chemistry analyzer system, including consumables, that is used~~ to ~~measure important constituents in human and animal blood. In~~ the ~~United~~Company ~~States,~~for the ~~Company~~purpose ~~sells~~of ~~its~~financing ~~products~~working ~~through~~capital ~~distributors~~needs. TiFunding ~~and~~acquired ~~directly~~this tofacility ~~physicians, veterinarians, clinical laboratories and blood banks and~~ on aFebruary ~~private-label~~7, ~~basis~~2011 ~~through~~from ~~multinational~~Bay ~~distributors. Internationally~~Bank, ~~the~~FSB ~~Company~~for ~~sells~~approximately ~~its products primarily through distributors~~$360,000. ~~The~~Refer ~~Company~~to ~~was~~Note ~~incorporated~~8 infor ~~1985~~a ~~and~~description ~~became~~of athis ~~public~~line ~~company in~~of ~~1993~~credit.

NOTE ~~2—FINANCIAL~~5 ~~CONDITION~~- INVENTORIES

AtInventories September 30, 2010, Hemagen had $151,743 of unrestricted cash, working capital of $1,601,979 and a current ratio of 2.37 to 1.0. Hemagen currently has a revolving line of credit with a bank for the purpose of financing working capital needs as required. The line of credit currently provides for borrowings up to $500,000, at an annual interest rate of the prime rate plus 3/4% with an interest rate floor of 5.5%. As of December 18, 2010, there was $398,000 outstanding on the line. Hemagen believes that cash flow from operations and cash on hand at September ~~30,~~ 2010 will be sufficient to finance its operations for fiscal 2010. The company’s ability to borrow on the line is based on a borrowing base calculation dependent upon domestic receivables under 90 days and inventory. At November 30, ~~2010,~~consist ~~the amount available to Hemagen to borrow against the line based on the calculation was $425,727. The line~~ of ~~credit~~ ~~comes due on December 31, 2010 and~~ the ~~Company intends to renew the line with the bank at that time. However, Hemagen can give no assurances that it will have sufficient cash to repay the line of credit if it is not renewed or finance~~following: ~~its operations. Hemagen has no off-balance sheet financing arrangements.~~

NOTE 3—SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

	2011			2010

Raw materials	$	1,039,604		$	1,171,982
Work-in-process		48,049			137,035
Finished goods		914,285			816,272
		2,001,938			2,125,289
Less reserves (obsolesce and dating),		(541,158	)		(738,972	)
Inventories, net	$	1,460,780		$	1,386,317

~~Principles~~NOTE of6 ~~Consolidation~~- PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

~~The~~Property ~~accompanying~~and ~~consolidated~~equipment ~~financial~~at ~~statements~~September ~~include~~30, ~~the~~consists ~~accounts~~ of the Company; it’s wholly owned subsidiaries, Reagents Applications, Inc. (“RAI”) and Hemagen Diagnostics Commercio, Importaco & Exporataco, Ltd. (“HDC”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. following:

Use of Estimates

	2011			2010

Furniture and equipment	$	6,723,107		$	6,730,072
Leasehold improvements		95,093			93,492
		6,818,200			6,823,564

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(6,431,680	)		(6,297,906	)

Property and equipment, net	$	386,520		$	525,658

~~The~~Depreciation ~~preparation~~and ofamortization ~~financial~~expense ~~statements~~relating into ~~conformity with~~property ~~U.S.~~and ~~generally~~equipment ~~accepted~~was ~~accounting~~$185,814 ~~principles requires management to make estimates~~ and ~~assumptions~~$163,943 ~~that~~for ~~affect~~ the ~~reported~~years ~~amounts~~ended ofSeptember ~~assets~~30, 2011 and ~~liabilities~~2010, ~~and~~respectively. ~~disclosure~~Of ofthese ~~contingent~~amounts ~~assets~~$153,643 and ~~liabilities~~$137,051 atwere included in the ~~date~~SG&A offor ~~the~~fiscal ~~financial statements~~2011 and ~~the~~2010, ~~reported~~respectively ~~amounts~~and of$32,171 ~~revenues~~ and ~~expenses~~$26,892 ~~during~~were ~~the~~included ~~reporting~~in ~~period.~~costs ~~Actual~~of ~~results~~sales ~~could~~for ~~differ~~fiscal ~~from~~years ~~those~~2011 ~~estimates.~~and 2010, respectively.

~~Foreign Currency Translation~~ F-12

~~The~~NOTE ~~financial~~7 ~~position~~- ~~and~~ACCOUNTS ~~results~~PAYABLE ofAND ~~operations~~ACCRUED ~~of HDC are measured using HDC’s local currency, the Brazilian Real, as the functional currency. Revenues and expenses of HDC have been translated into U.S. dollars~~ LIABILITIES

~~F-9~~ Accounts payable and accrued liabilities include the following at September 30:

	2011		2010
Accounts payable – trade	$	415,221	$	308,601
Accrued professional fees		20,150		21,050
Accrued vacation Accrued taxes Accrued interest		81,883 64,636 36,511		86,758 142,638 38,335
Accrued other		200,474		145,788

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	818,875	$	743,170

~~Hemagen~~NOTE ~~Diagnostics,~~8 ~~Inc.~~- ~~and~~LINE ~~Subsidiaries~~OF CREDIT

~~NOTES~~TiFunding, TOLLC, ~~CONSOLIDATED~~a ~~FINANCIAL~~Delaware ~~STATEMENTS—CONTINUED~~limited liability company owned by William P. Hales, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and President, and his father, provides a senior secured line of credit facility to the Company for the purpose of financing working capital needs. TiFunding acquired this facility on February 7, 2011 from Bay Bank, FSB for approximately $360,000, and increased the line of credit to $1,000,000 dollars.

~~For~~The facility’s term maturity has been extended to October 1, 2012, is renewable annually and provides for borrowings at an annual interest rate of 9%. Maximum borrowings under the facility not to exceed $1,000,000 are based on certain receivables and inventory of the Company. The ~~Years~~facility ~~Ending~~is secured by a first lien on all assets of the Company. In connection with the facility, the Company issued to TiFunding warrants to purchase $1,000,000 in shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.20 per share. These warrants are exercisable at any time until February 7, 2016 and have certain demand registration rights. The expense related to the warrants is being amortized over the life of the warrants and is included as interest expense in the accompanying financial statements. As of September 30, ~~2010~~2011, ~~and~~the ~~2009~~outstanding balance on the facility was $669,413. The Company is in compliance with all of the covenants in the facility as of the date of this report.

atNOTE ~~average~~9 ~~exchange~~– ~~rates~~NOTE prevailing during the year. Assets and liabilities have been translated at the rates of exchange on the balance sheet date. The resulting translation gain and loss adjustments are recorded directly as a separate component of stockholders’ equity. PAYABLE

~~Cash~~Hemagen ~~Equivalents~~Diagnostics Commercio, Importaco & Exporataco, Ltd. ("HDC") had obtained notes used to finance the purchase of automated equipment that was placed into key customer accounts. As of September 30, 2010 these notes were paid in full. The notes bore interest at 1.45% per month or 17.4% annual interest, and were to be repaid in 24 equal monthly installments. These capital notes were secured by HDC receivables at the ratio of 50% receivable to loan value.

~~The~~NOTE ~~Company~~10 ~~considers~~– ~~all~~SENIOR ~~investments~~SUBORDINATED ~~with~~SECURED ~~original~~CONVERTIBLE ~~maturities of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. The Company may have amounts in cash accounts in excess of federally insured limits throughout the year.~~ NOTES

~~Accounts~~During ~~Receivable~~September 2009, the Company completed an Exchange Offer of its senior subordinated secured convertible notes due on September 30, 2009. The Company offered to exchange new, modified 8% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes due 2014 for the outstanding 8% Senior Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes due 2009. The principal features of the Exchange Offer included $4,049,858 principal amount of Senior Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes, due September 30, 2014, which bear interest at the rate of 8% per annum, paid quarterly, convertible by holders into Common Stock at $.35 per share. The Company can require the conversion of these Modified Notes to Common Stock at any time after the Common Stock trades at or above $0.70 for fifteen consecutive trading days.

AThe ~~majority of the~~ Company’s ~~accounts~~has ~~receivable~~accounted ~~are~~for ~~due~~the ~~from~~Exchange ~~distributors~~Offer ~~(domestic~~as ~~and~~though ~~international),~~the ~~hospitals,~~exchange ~~universities,~~of ~~and physician and veterinary offices and other entities in~~ the ~~medical~~entire ~~field.~~amount ~~Credit is extended based on evaluation~~ of ~~a customer’s financial condition and~~$4, ~~generally~~049,858 ~~collateral is not required. Accounts receivable are stated at amounts due from customers net~~ of anthe ~~allowance for doubtful accounts. Accounts with~~ outstanding ~~balances~~notes ~~for~~was ~~longer~~effective ~~than~~as ~~the contractual payment terms are considered past due. The Company determines its allowance by considering a number~~ of ~~factors,~~September ~~including the length of time trade accounts receivable are past due~~30, ~~the Company’s previous loss history~~2009, ~~the~~because ~~customer’s~~at ~~current~~September ~~ability to pay its obligation to the Company~~30, ~~and~~2009 ~~the~~all ~~condition~~ of the ~~general~~terms ~~economy~~ and ~~the~~conditions ~~industry~~for ~~as a whole. The Company writes off accounts receivable when they become uncollectible, and payments subsequently received on such receivables are posted against~~ the ~~allowance~~consummation ~~for doubtful accounts. The balance~~ of the ~~allowance~~exchange ~~for~~offer ~~doubtful~~had ~~accounts~~been ~~was $60,016 and $69,973 on September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively~~satisfied. ~~The Company does not accrue interest on accounts receivable past due.~~

~~Inventories~~The Modified Notes are secured by a first lien on all real, tangible and intangible property except that the terms of the Modified Notes provide that they are subordinated to the following (i) a senior secured credit facility that is equal to or less than Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000), (ii) any secured financing that is greater than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000), provided that (A) the Company provides the Holder twenty (20) business days’ written notice of such secured financing, and (B) all of the funds raised in connection with such secured financing shall be used to reduce, on a pro rata basis, the Principal Amount and accrued and unpaid interest owed on the Notes, (iii) real estate financing that the Company may incur for the purchase of a corporate facility provided that the annual mortgage payments are less than the rent expense that the Company pays in the year of such purchase for its leased facilities, and (iv) secured financing not to exceed Four Million Dollars ($4,000,000) at any one time for the purpose of financing an acquisition by the Company of the business of another person or entity.

~~Inventories are stated at the lower of cost, determined on the first~~F-in, first-out basis, or market. Inventory reserves are established for obsolescence based on expiration dating of perishable products and excess levels of inventory on hand. The Company had $738,972 and $750,488 of inventory reserves as of September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. 13

~~Long~~NOTE 11 -~~lived~~ ~~Assets~~STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

~~The~~Preferred Company reviews the carrying values of its long-lived assets for possible impairment annually or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. If the review indicates that long-lived assets are not recoverable (i.e., the carrying amount is less than the future projected undiscounted cash flows), the carrying amount would be reduced to fair value and a charge to income would be recorded. Hemagen did not have any long-lived assets whose balances needed to be reduced. Stock

~~Property~~The Company is authorized to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $.01 par value per share. The preferred stock may be issued in one or more series, the terms of which may be determined at the time of issuance by the Board of Directors and ~~Equipment~~may include voting rights, preferences as to dividends and liquidation, conversion and redemption rights and sinking fund provisions. No shares of preferred stock are issued or outstanding at September 30, 2011 or 2010.

~~Property~~Accumulated ~~and~~Other ~~equipment~~Comprehensive is stated at net book value. Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets, which range from 3 to 10 years. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Loss

~~F-10~~ Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists solely of foreign currency translation adjustments totaling $20,587 of loss and $17,914 of income at September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

~~Table~~Stock ~~of Contents~~Options

~~Hemagen~~On ~~Diagnostics~~February 27, ~~Inc~~2001, the shareholders voted to approve the 2001 Stock Option Plan. The 2001 Stock Option Plan provides for the grant of incentive and ~~Subsidiaries~~nonqualified stock options for the purchase of an aggregate of 1,000,000 shares of the Company's common stock by employees, directors and consultants of the Company. The 2001 Stock Option Plan expired in February of 2011. No additional options will be issued under this plan.

~~NOTES~~On TOApril ~~CONSOLIDATED~~25, ~~FINANCIAL~~2007, ~~STATEMENTS—CONTINUED~~the shareholders voted to approve the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan. Under this plan, the Board has reserved a maximum of 1,500,000 shares for issuance pursuant to stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and stock awards.

~~For~~On ~~The~~April ~~Years~~30, ~~Ending~~2009, ~~September~~the ~~30,~~shareholders ~~2010~~voted ~~and~~to ~~2009~~amend the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares authorized to be issued under the plan from 1,500,000 to 3,000,000.

~~Other~~The ~~Assets~~Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for the administration of both Plans. The Compensation Committee determines the term of each option, the number of shares for which each option is granted and the rate at which each option is exercisable.

~~Other~~The ~~assets,~~Company ~~net~~recorded atin ~~September 30~~selling, ~~2010~~general and ~~2009~~administrative ~~consists~~expenses, of$45,999 ~~product~~and ~~registration~~25,957 ~~certificates~~of ~~that~~stock ~~are~~compensation ~~being~~expense ~~amortized~~for ~~over~~the ~~their~~years 5ended ~~year~~September ~~life~~30, ~~security~~2011 ~~deposits~~and ~~relating to the facilities that are being leased~~2010, ~~and the long term portion of the Note Receivable~~respectively.

~~Income~~The ~~Taxes~~following are the assumptions made in computing the fair value of the share-based awards:

The Company follows the liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax liabilities and assets are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amount and the tax basis of assets and liabilities at each year-end based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. A valuation allowance is established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.

	2011	2010
Dividend yield	--	--
Expected volatility	129.73% - 137.95%	125.86%
Risk-free interest rate	1.47% - 3.48%	3.34%
Expected life in years	5 - 10	10

~~Revenue~~Expected ~~Recognition~~volatilities are based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. The expected term of the options granted represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercise and employee termination within the evaluation model. The risk-free rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of the grant.

~~Revenues~~A ~~from~~summary ~~the sale~~ of ~~products are recognized when shipped, all contractual obligations have been satisfied, and~~ the ~~collection~~stock ofoption ~~the~~activity resulting receivable is reasonably assured. Revenues from product service contracts, which are based on their relative fair value, are recognized ratably over the term of the contract. Losses are provided for at the ~~time~~year ~~that~~ended ~~management~~September ~~determines~~30, ~~that~~2011 ~~contract~~and ~~costs will exceed~~ related ~~revenues.~~information ~~The portion of product service contracts not complete at the balance sheet date~~ is ~~included~~shown ~~in deferred revenue.~~ below:

Stock-Based Compensation

	SHARES			WEIGHTED-AVERAGE EXERCISE PRICE		WEIGHTED- AVERAGE LIFE IN YEARS

BALANCE, OCTOBER 1, 2009		1,007,208		$	0.24		7.21
GRANTED		1,955,000			0.11		9.66
EXERCISED		-			-		-
CANCELLED OR EXPIRED		(30,000	)		0.32		1.64

BALANCE, SEPTEMBER 30, 2010		2,932,208		$	0.15		7.56
GRANTED		230,000			0.10		5.26
EXERCISED		-			-		-
CANCELLED OR EXPIRED		(20,000	)	$	0.17		1.78

BALANCE, SEPTEMBER 30, 2011		3,142,208		$	0.14		7.43

EXERCISABLE, SEPTEMBER 30, 2011		1,709,375		$	0.17		6.87

AtExercise ~~September 30,~~prices ~~2010,~~for options ~~for~~outstanding ~~the~~as ~~purchase~~ of 2September 30,~~932,208~~ ~~shares~~2011 ofranged ~~common~~from ~~stock with a weighted average exercise price of~~ $0.2504 ~~were outstanding. During the twelve months ended September 30, 2010, options~~ to ~~purchase 1,955,000 shares at a weighted-average exercise price of~~ $0.1597 ~~per~~as ~~share were granted. During the twelve months ended September 30, 2010, no options were exercised and 30,000 options expired or were forfeited.~~ follows:

We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of our awards on the date of grant. The fair value of each option award is estimated on the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option-pricing formula that uses the assumptions noted in the table and discussion that follows:

Options Outstanding
Range of Exercise Prices	Number Outstanding at September 30, 2011	Weighted-Average Remaining Contractual Life (years)	Weighted Average Exercise Price

0.04 – 0.14	2,255,000	8.3	0.11
0.15 – 0.24	737,208	5.6	0.19
0.25 – 0.34	55,000	3.3	0.28
0.35 – 0.59	50,000	6.6	0.35
0.60 – 0.70	25,000	2.4	0.70
0.71 – 0.97	20,000	0.4	0.97
0.04 – 0.97	3,142,208	7.3	0.14

	Period EndingSeptember 30,
	2010	2009
Dividend yield	—	—
Expected volatility	125.86%	95% – 120%
Risk-free interest rate	3.34%	1.67% – 3.16%
Expected life in years	10	1.5 – 10

The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted during 2011 and 2010 was $10,158 and $130,177, respectively.

WeAssuming ~~will reconsider~~that ~~the~~no ~~use~~additional ofshare-based ~~the~~payments ~~Black-Scholes~~are ~~model~~granted ifafter ~~additional~~September ~~information~~30, ~~becomes~~2011, ~~available~~$79,823 of compensation expense will be recognized in the ~~future~~consolidated ~~that~~statement ~~indicates~~of ~~another~~operations ~~model~~over ~~would~~a beweighted-average ~~more~~period ~~appropriate,~~of orfive ifyears. The ~~grants~~options ~~issued~~outstanding inand ~~future~~exercisable ~~periods~~as ~~have~~of ~~characteristics~~September ~~that~~30, ~~cannot~~2011 behave ~~reasonably estimated~~no ~~under~~intrinsic ~~this model~~value.

~~We incur share-based compensation expense over the requisite service period. We estimate forfeitures and only record expense on shares we expect to vest.~~ Warrants

~~F-11~~ On February 7, 2011 TiFunding LLC, a Delaware limited liability company owned by William P. Hales , the Company’s Chief Executive Office and President, and his father purchased the senior secured credit line facility from Bay Bank, FSB for approximately $360,000. In connection with the facility, the Company issued to TiFunding warrants to purchase $1,000,000 in shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.20 per share. These warrants are exercisable at any time until February 7, 2016 and have certain demand registration rights. The expense related to these warrants is being amortized over the life of the warrants and is included as interest expense in the accompanying financial statements.

~~Table of Contents~~F-14

~~Hemagen~~The ~~Diagnostics,~~following ~~Inc.~~table ~~and~~summarizes ~~Subsidiaries~~the Company’s warrant activity for the twelve months ended September 30, 2011:

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED

	Warrants		Average Weighted Exercise Price		Weighted Average Life (in years)
Warrants Outstanding – October 1, 2010		--		--		--
Granted		5,000,000	$	.20		4.36
Exercised		--		--		--
Forfeited, cancelled or expired		--		--		--
Warrants outstanding – September 30, 2011		5,000,000	$	.20		4.36

Warrants exercisable – September 30, 2011		5,000,000	$	.20		4.36

~~For~~ The ~~Years~~weighted-average ~~Ending~~grant date fair value of the warrants issued during 2011 was $239,091. As of September 30, ~~2010~~2011 ~~and~~there ~~2009~~was $207,212 of unamortized interest expense associated with these warrants. This expense will be fully amortized within five years.

AsStockholder ofRights September 30, 2010, there was approximately $116,049 of unrecognized compensation cost related to share-based compensation arrangements that will be fully amortized within four years. The Company had 105,000 options issued and exercisable as of September 30, 2010 with an aggregate intrinsic value of $6,300. Agreement

~~Research~~In ~~and~~April ~~Development~~2010, ~~Costs~~the Company's Board of Directors approved a Stockholder Rights Agreement (the "Agreement"). Under the Agreement the Company declared a dividend of one common stock purchase right (a "Right") for each share of the Company's outstanding common stock as of April 29, 2010. Each Right entitles the holder to purchase from the Company one share of Common Stock of the Company at a cash exercise price of $0.15 per share (the "Exercise Price"), subject to adjustment, under certain conditions provided in the Agreement.

~~All~~The ~~costs~~Rights ~~incurred~~become toexercisable ~~research,~~only ~~design~~if ~~and~~a ~~develop~~person ~~products~~or ~~are~~group, ~~considered~~as ~~research~~defined ~~and~~in ~~development~~Section ~~costs~~13(d)(3) ~~and~~of ~~are~~Securities ~~charged~~Exchange toAct ~~expense~~of 1934, as ~~incurred.~~amended, acquires beneficial ownership of 10 percent or more of the Company's outstanding common stock or announces a tender offer that would result in beneficial ownership of 10 percent or more of the Company's outstanding common stock.

~~Fair~~William ~~Value~~P. Hales, the Company's Chief Executive Officer, who is a stockholder and a debt holder of ~~Financial~~the ~~Instruments~~Company, is exempt under the Agreement. The Rights, which are scheduled to Expire on April 29, 2020, are redeemable in whole at the Company's option at $0.0000001 per Right at the times and under the circumstances set forth in the Agreement. No Rights have yet been exercised or have redeemed under the Agreement.

~~Financial~~NOTE ~~instruments~~12 ~~include cash and cash equivalents, short~~-~~term~~ ~~investments,~~INCOME customer receivables, accounts payable, certain other accrued liabilities and long-term debt. The fair value of long-term debt approximates the carrying amount based on the current rate offered to the Company for debt of similar remaining maturities. The carrying values of all other financial instruments are reasonable estimates of their values. TAXES

~~Advertising~~For ~~Expenses~~the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, domestic and foreign (losses) or income before income taxes from continuing operations are as follows:

Costs of advertising, which also include promotional expenses, are expensed as incurred. Advertising expenses for fiscal 2010 and 2009 were approximately $7,404 and $21,106, respectively.

Years ended September 30,	2011			2010
Domestic	$	(667,317	)	$	(393,896	)
Foreign		(209,414	)		327,161
Net income (loss), before income taxes	$	(876,731	)	$	(66,735	)

For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had current income tax expense of approximately $4,131 and $89,579 respectively which related to foreign income tax expenses from its Brazilian subsidiary. The difference between income taxes on provided at the Company's effective tax rate and the Federal statutory rate is as follows:

Shipping and Handling

Years ended September 30,	2011			2010
Federal tax at statutory rate		34	%		34	%
Valuation Allowance		(34	)		(34	)
Current tax expense on international operations		-- 24.0			-- 31.3
		24.0	%		31.3	%

~~The cost of shipping products to customers is included in cost of goods sold. Amounts billed to a customer in a sale transaction related to shipping and handling are classified as revenue.~~ F-15

~~Recent~~Deferred ~~Accounting~~tax ~~Pronouncements~~assets (liabilities) are comprised of the following at September 30, 2011 and 2010:

The Subsequent Events Topic of the FASB ASC establishes general standards of accounting for, and disclosure of, events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. This accounting standard sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition or disclosure in the financial statements. This standard also sets forth the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements and the disclosures that an entity should make about events or transactions that occurred after the balance sheet date. This accounting standard is effective for interim or annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-09 which amended ASC 855. This amendment, which was effective upon issuance, removed the requirement for SEC registrants to disclose the date through which such registrants have evaluated subsequent events.

	2011			2010

Net operating loss carry forwards	$	7,717,000		$	7,389,000
Inventory reserve		216,000			295,000
Accounts receivable reserve		8,000			4,000
Other		82,000			89,000
Total deferred tax assets		8,023.000			7,777,000
Basis difference in fixed assets		(43,000	)		(32,000	)
Net deferred tax assets		7,980,000			7,745,000
Valuation allowance		(7,980,000	)		(7,745,000	)
Total reported deferred tax assets	$	--		$	--

InThe ~~October~~Company ~~2009,~~has ~~the~~provided ~~FASB~~a ~~issued~~valuation ~~ASU~~allowance ~~2009-13,~~equal ~~Multiple~~to ~~Deliverable~~100% ~~Revenue~~of ~~Arrangements, (“ASU~~the ~~2009-13”),~~net ~~which~~deferred ~~applies~~tax toasset ~~all deliverables~~ in ~~contractual~~recognition ~~arrangements~~of ~~in which a vendor will perform multiple revenue-generating activities. In April 2010,~~ the ~~FASB~~uncertainty ~~issued~~regarding ~~ASU 2010-17, Revenue Recognition—Milestone Method, (“ASU 2010-17”), which defines a milestone and determines when it may be appropriate to apply~~ the ~~milestone~~ultimate ~~method~~amount of ~~revenue~~the ~~recognition~~net ~~for~~deferred ~~research~~tax orasset ~~development~~that ~~transactions. These pronouncements are codified in ASC Topic 605, Revenue Recognition, and~~ will be ~~effective for our fiscal year that begins January 1, 2011~~realized. These pronouncements may be applied prospectively or retrospectively, and early adoption is permitted. We are evaluating the impact that adoption of ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2010-17 may have on our consolidated financial statements.

FAt September 30, 2011 the Company had approximately $22,698,000 of federal operating loss carry-12 forwards available to offset future taxable income, which expires on various dates through 2031. Ownership changes as defined in the Internal Revenue Code may limit the amount of net operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards that may be utilized annually. The Company also had Brazilian net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $1,102,000 which is available to offset future Brazilian taxable income.

~~Table~~NOTE of13 ~~Contents~~- SIGNIFICANT SALES AND CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

~~Hemagen~~Revenues ~~Diagnostics~~derived from export sales, ~~Inc~~excluding sales to the company’s subsidiary in Brazil, amounted to approximately $1,543,973 or 30% of total sales in 2011 and $1,157,000, or 22% of total sales in 2010. Export sales to Europe were approximately $1,028,917 or 20% of total sales in 2011 and ~~Subsidiaries~~$759,000 or 14% of total sales in 2010.

~~NOTES~~At TOSeptember ~~CONSOLIDATED~~30, ~~FINANCIAL~~2011 ~~STATEMENTS—CONTINUED~~and 2010, the Company had approximately $37,458 and $107,723 of cash in foreign bank accounts.

~~For~~NOTE ~~The~~14 ~~Years~~- ~~Ending~~GEOGRAPHICAL ~~September 30, 2010 and 2009~~ INFORMATION

~~ASU~~The ~~2010-01,~~Company ~~“Equity~~considers ~~(Topic~~its ~~505)—Accounting~~manufactured for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash.” ASU 2010-01 was issued in January 2010 and clarifies that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in earnings per share prospectively and is not a stock dividend. ASU 2010-01 is effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15kits, ~~2009,~~tests and ~~should~~instruments beas ~~applied~~one onoperating ~~a retrospective basis~~segment. ~~ASU 2010-01 had no impact on our consolidated financial statements.~~

~~ASU~~The ~~2010-06,~~following ~~“Improving~~table ~~Disclosure~~sets ~~about~~forth ~~Fair~~revenue ~~Value~~for ~~Measurements,”~~the ~~was~~periods ~~issued~~reported ~~in January 2010~~ and ~~requires additional disclosures regarding fair value measurements, amends disclosures about post-retirement benefit plan~~ assets ~~and provides clarification regarding the level of disaggregation of fair value disclosures~~ by ~~investment~~geographic ~~class.~~location ~~The ASU is effective~~ for ~~interim~~the ~~and~~twelve ~~annual~~months ~~reporting~~ended ~~periods~~September ~~beginning after December 15~~30, ~~2009,~~ ~~except~~2011 ~~for~~and ~~certain Level 3 activity disclosure requirements that will be effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15~~2010, ~~2010~~respectively. ~~Adoption of ASU 2010-06 had no material impact on our consolidated financial statements.~~

NOTE 4—RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

	United States*	Brazil	Consolidated

September 30, 2011:
Revenues	$2,750,948	$2,390,278	$5,141,226
Long-lived assets	175,697	263,481	439,178
September 30, 2010:
Revenues	$2,626,939	$2,593,231	$5,220,170
Long-lived assets	239,607	361,301	600,908

~~NOTE~~* ~~5—INVENTORIES~~Includes export sales to countries other than Brazil of approximately $1,543,973 and $1,157,000 in 2011 and 2010, respectively.

~~Inventories~~The atlong-lived ~~September 30~~assets include property and equipment, ~~consist~~intangibles, and long-term notes receivable, net of ~~the~~any ~~following:~~depreciation and amortization.

	2010			2009
Raw materials	$	1,171,982		$	1,350,828
Work-in-process		137,035			164,183
Finished goods		816,272			938,703
		2,125,289			2,453,714
Less reserves		(738,972	)		(750,488	)
Inventories, net	$	1,386,317		$	1,703,226

NOTE 15- COMMITMENTS

~~NOTE~~The ~~6—PROPERTY~~Company ~~AND~~leases ~~EQUIPMENT~~certain facilities and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases lasting through 2014. Future minimum lease commitments under the non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:

~~Property~~Years ~~and~~ending ~~equipment at~~ September 30, ~~consists of the following:~~

	2010			2009
2012	$	182,939
Furniture and equipment	$	6,730,072		$	6,665,360
2013	$	2,536
Leasehold improvements		93,492			77,004
2014	$	708
		6,823,564			6,742,364
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(6,297,906	)		(6,143,356	)
Property and equipment, net	$	525,658		$	599,008

~~Depreciation~~Rent ~~and amortization~~ expense ~~relating~~was toapproximately ~~property~~$394,000 and ~~equipment was~~ $~~163~~389,~~943~~000 for 2011 and ~~$156~~2010,~~736~~ ~~for~~respectively. ~~the years~~Rent ~~ended~~expense ~~September 30~~is included in the selling, ~~2010~~general and ~~2009,~~administrative ~~respectively.~~expense category on the income statement.

~~F-13~~ Employee Benefit Plans

~~Table~~The Company maintains a defined contribution retirement plan, which qualifies under Section 401(k) of ~~Contents~~the Internal Revenue Code, covering substantially all employees. Participant contributions and employer matching contributions are made as defined in the 401(k) Plan agreement. The Company’s policy is to contribute to the ESOP plan rather than to match 401K contributions. As such, effective October 1, 2003, the Company created an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) for the benefit of its employees, which has been determined by the Internal Revenue Service to be a qualified retirement plan subject to section 4975(E)7 of the Code. The Employer has no obligations to contribute any amount under this plan except as so determined at its sole discretion. Employees are eligible to participate in the ESOP after 90 days of active employment and fully vest in the benefits after five years of service. The Company’s contributions to the ESOP were $10,000 in cash during each of the fiscal years 2011 and 2010. The compensation committee of the Board of Directors approves all contributions to the ESOP plan. At September 30, 2011 and 2010, the ESOP owned approximately 881,281 and 792,880 shares of Hemagen common stock, respectively, that were either purchased in the open market by the ESOP, or contributed by the company to the ESOP. As of September 30, 2011 the ESOP plan had approximately $3,519 of cash available to purchase additional shares in the open market. The 881,281 shares owned by the ESOP represent approximately 6% of the shares outstanding as of September 30, 2011.

~~Hemagen~~Directors ~~Diagnostics, Inc. and Subsidiaries~~ Plan

~~NOTES~~The TOCompany ~~CONSOLIDATED~~maintains ~~FINANCIAL~~a ~~STATEMENTS—CONTINUED~~Rule 10b5-1 Stock Purchase Plan (the 10b5-1 Plan) for its Non-employee Directors for which the company deposited cash as part of the directors’ compensation plan. Effective October 1, 2008, the director compensation plan changed and the non-employee Directors now receive a $2,500 cash payment and 2,500 shares of the Company’s common stock each quarter. The 10b5-1 Plan will continue to purchase shares in the open market until the cash balance is depleted.

~~For~~NOTE ~~The~~16 ~~Years~~– ~~Ending~~EARNINGS ~~September~~(LOSS) ~~30,~~PER ~~2010~~SHARE ~~and~~OF ~~2009~~COMMON STOCK

~~NOTE~~Basic ~~7—ACCOUNTS~~earnings ~~PAYABLE~~(loss) ~~AND~~per ~~ACCRUED~~common ~~LIABILITIES~~share are computed based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the twelve months ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Diluted earnings per common share is computed based on common shares outstanding plus the effect of dilutive stock options and other potentially dilutive common stock equivalents consisting of stock options and convertible debentures. The dilutive effect of stock options and other potentially dilutive common stock equivalents is determined using the treasury stock and if-converted method based on the Company’s average stock price for the period.

~~Accounts payable and accrued liabilities include the following at September 30:~~ F-17

	2010		2009
Accounts payable—trade	$	308,601	$	560,113
Accrued professional fees		21,050		47,111
Accrued vacation		86,758		81,375
Accrued taxes		142,638		99,081
Accrued interest		38,335		38,355
Accrued other		145,788		143,100
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	743,170	$	969,135

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share for the twelve month periods ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

NOTE 8—LINE OF CREDIT

	TWELVE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
	2011			2010

NUMERATOR:
NET LOSS	$	(880,863	)	$	(156,314	)

DE DENOMINATOR:
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING		15,476,486			15,454,103
EFFECT OF DILUTIVE SHARES		--			--
DENOMINATOR FOR DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE		15,476,486			15,454,103

BASIC EARNINGS PER SHARE	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.01	)
DILUTED EARNINGS PER SHARE	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.01	)

~~The~~Diluted ~~Company~~net ~~has~~income aper ~~revolving~~share ~~line~~does ofnot ~~credit~~include ~~with a bank for~~ the ~~purpose~~effect of ~~financing~~the ~~working~~following ~~capital~~common ~~needs~~stock asequivalents ~~required~~related ~~which~~to ~~pursuant~~outstanding toconvertible ~~its~~debentures ~~original~~and ~~terms~~stock ~~was~~purchase ~~scheduled~~options toas ~~expire~~their ~~annually~~effect onwould ~~April 1, 2010.~~be antidilutive:

On February 6, 2009, the Company’s bank, formerly known as Bay National Bank (now known as Bay Bank), voluntarily entered into a Consent Order (the “Consent Order”) with its primary regulator, the Office of the Comptroller of Currency (the “OCC”). As a result, the Bank informed Hemagen that it can no longer maintain the line of credit, and had granted Hemagen a three month extension until August 1, 2010 to relocate the line of credit.

	TWELVE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,
	2011		2010

CONVERTIBLE NOTES		11,571,022		11,571,000
WARRANTS		3,232,877		--
OPTIONS TO PURCHASE COMMON STOCK		3,060,564		1,678,564
TOTAL ANTIDILUTIVE INSTRUMENTS		17,864,463		13,249,564

OnNOTE ~~Friday, July 9,~~17 ~~2010~~- ~~Bay~~SUPPLEMENTAL ~~National~~DISCLOSURE ~~Bank,~~OF Baltimore MD was closed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) was named Receiver. Simultaneously, all deposit accounts were transferred to Bay Bank, FSB Lutherville, Maryland and the former Bay National Bank locations reopened the next business day as Bay Bank, FSB. Depositors of Bay National Bank automatically became depositors of Bay Bank, FSB. CASH

Hemagen has maintained its relationship with Bay Bank, FSB, who granted an additional extension through December 31, 2010. At that point, the Bank will review the Company’s financial statements and determine whether or not they will extend the line. We can give no assurances that our efforts will be successful. The line of credit facility provides for borrowings up to $500,000 at an interest rate of Prime Rate plus .75%, with an interest rate floor of 5.5%. Maximum borrowings under the loan are based on the domestic receivables and inventory of the Company. The line of credit facility has a first lien on all assets of the Company. As of September 30, 2010, the outstanding balance on the line of credit was $398,000 with an effective interest rate of 5.50%. As of September 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with its debt covenants.

September 30,	2011		2010

Cash paid for interest	$	388,914	$	365,325

Cash paid for income taxes (Brazil)	$	4,132	$	89,579

Cash paid for property and equipment purchases	$	56,414	$	74,142

~~NOTE 9—NOTE PAYABLE~~ F-18

Hemagen Diagnostics Commercio, Importaco & Exporataco, Ltd. (“HDC”) had obtained notes used to finance the purchase of automated equipment that was placed into key customer accounts. As of September 30, 2010 these notes were paid in full. The notes bore interest at 1.45% per month or 17.4% annual interest, and were to be repaid in 24 equal monthly installments. These capital notes were secured by HDC receivables at the ratio of 50% receivable to loan value.

F-14

Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED

For The Years Ending September 30, 2010 and 2009

NOTE 10—EXCHANGE OFFER

During September 2009, the Company completed an Exchange Offer of its senior subordinated secured convertible notes due on September 30, 2009. The Company offered to exchange new, modified 8% Senior Subordinated Convertible Notes due 2014 for the outstanding 8% Senior Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes due 2009. The principal features of the Exchange Offer included $4,049,858 principal amount of Senior Subordinated Secured Convertible Notes, due September 30, 2014, which bear interest at the rate of 8% per annum, paid quarterly, convertible by holders into Common Stock at $.35 per share. The Company can require the conversion of these Modified Notes to Common Stock at any time after the Common Stock trades at or above $0.70 for fifteen consecutive trading days.

The Company has accounted for the Exchange Offer as though the exchange of the entire amount of $4,049,858 of the outstanding notes was effective as of September 30, 2009, because at September 30, 2009 all of the terms and conditions for the consummation of the exchange offer had been satisfied.

The Modified Notes are secured by a first lien on all real, tangible and intangible property except that the terms of the Modified Notes provide that the following are subordinate to (i) a credit facility that is equal to or less than Three Million Dollars ($3,000,000), (ii) any secured financing that is greater than Two Million Dollars ($2,000,000), provided that (A) the Company provides the Holder twenty (20) business days’ written notice of such secured financing, and (B) all of the funds raised in connection with such secured financing shall be used to reduce, on a pro rata basis, the Principal Amount and accrued and unpaid interest owed on the Notes, (iii) real estate financing that the Company may incur for the purchase of a corporate facility provided that the annual mortgage payments are less than the rent expense that the Company pays in the year of such purchase for its leased facilities, and (iv) secured financing not to exceed Four Million Dollars ($4,000,000) at any one time for the purpose of financing an acquisition by the Company of the business of another person or entity.

NOTE 11—STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Preferred Stock

The Company is authorized to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $.01 par value per share. The preferred stock may be issued in one or more series, the terms of which may be determined at the time of issuance by the Board of Directors and may include voting rights, preferences as to dividends and liquidation, conversion and redemption rights and sinking fund provisions. No shares of preferred stock have been issued.

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) consists solely of foreign currency translation adjustments totaling $17,914 of income and $30,972 of loss at September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Stock Options

On February 27, 2001, the shareholders voted to approve the 2001 Stock Option Plan. The 2001 Stock Option Plan provides for the grant of incentive and nonqualified stock options for the purchase of an aggregate of 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock by employees, directors and consultants of the Company.

On April 25, 2007, the shareholders voted to approve the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan. Under this plan, the Board has reserved a maximum of 1,500,000 shares for issuance pursuant to stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock awards, restricted stock units and stock awards.

F-15

Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED

For The Years Ending September 30, 2010 and 2009

On April 30, 2009, the shareholders voted to amend the 2007 Stock Incentive Plan to increase the number of shares authorized to be issued under the plan from 1,500,000 to 3,000,000.

The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors is responsible for the administration of both Plans. The Compensation Committee determines the term of each option, the number of shares for which each option is granted and the rate at which each option is exercisable.

Changes in options outstanding are summarized as follows:

	Shares			Weighted-AverageExercisePrice
Balance, October 1, 2008		2,464,014		$	1.11
Granted		441,208			0.18
Exercised		—			—
Cancelled or expired		(1,898,014	)		1.28
Balance, September 30, 2009		1,007,208		$	0.24
Granted		1,955,000			0.11
Exercised		—			—
Cancelled or expired		30,000			0.32
Balance, September 30, 2010		2,932,208			0.15
Exercisable at September 30, 2010		1,031,208			0.22

The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at September 30, 2010:

Options Outstanding
Range of ExercisePrices	NumberOutstanding atSeptember 30, 2010		Weighted-AverageRemaining ContractualLife (years)		Weighted AverageExercise Price
0.07 – 0.15		2,035,000		9.6		0.11
0.16 – 0.24		747,208		6.5		0.19
0.25 – 0.34		55,000		4.3		0.28
0.35 – 0.59		50,000		7.6		0.35
0.60 – 0.70		25,000		3.4		0.70
0.71 – 0.97		20,000		1.4		0.97
0.09 – 0.97		2,932,208		8.6		0.15

The fair value of each option grant was determined on the date of the grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions used for grants in 2010 and 2009:

	2010	2009
Dividend yield	—	—
Expected volatility	125.86%	95% – 120%
Risk-free interest rate	3.34%	1.67% – 3.16%
Expected life in years	10	1.5 – 10

F-16

Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED

For The Years Ending September 30, 2010 and 2009

The weighted-average grant date fair value of options granted during 2010 and 2009 was $130,177 and $40,349, respectively.

Stockholder Rights Agreement

In April 2010, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a Stockholder Rights Agreement (the “Agreement”). Under the Agreement the Company declared a dividend of one common stock purchase right (a “Right”) for each share of the Company’s outstanding common stock as of April 29, 2010. Each Right entitles the holder to purchase from the Company one share of Common Stock of the Company at a cash exercise price of $0.15 per share (the “Exercise Price”), subject to adjustment, under certain conditions provided in the Agreement.

The Rights become exercisable only if a person or group, as defined in Section 13(d)(3) of Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, acquires beneficial ownership of 10 percent or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock or announces a tender offer that would result in beneficial ownership of 10 percent or more of the Company’s outstanding common stock.

William P. Hales, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, who is a stockholder and a debt holder of the Company, is exempt under the Agreement. The Rights, which are scheduled to Expire on April 29, 2020, are redeemable in whole at the Company’s option at $0.0000001 per Right at the times and under the circumstances set forth in the Agreement. No Rights have yet been exercised under the Agreement.

NOTE 12—INCOME TAXES

For the years ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, domestic and foreign (losses) or income before income taxes from continuing operations are as follows:

Years ended September 30,	2010			2009
Domestic	$	(393,896	)	$	(856,046	)
Foreign		327,161			146,918
Net income (loss) from continuing operations, before income taxes	$	(66,735	)	$	(709,128	)

For the fiscal years ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company had current income tax expense of approximately $89,579 and $20,821 respectively which related to foreign income tax expenses from its Brazilian subsidiary. The difference between income taxes on continuing operations provided at the Company’s effective tax rate and the Federal statutory rate is as follows:

Years ended September 30,	2010			2009
Federal tax at statutory rate		34	%		34	%
Valuation Allowance		(34	)		(34	)
Current tax expense on international		—			—
operations		31.3			8.6
		31.3	%		8.6	%

F-17

Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED

For The Years Ending September 30, 2010 and 2009

Deferred tax assets (liabilities) are comprised of the following at September 30, 2009 and 2008:

	2010			2009
Net operating loss carry forwards	$	7,389,000		$	7,198,000
Inventory reserve		295,000			300,000
Accounts receivable reserve		4,000			9,000
Other		89,000			68,000
Total deferred tax assets		7,777,000			7,575,000
Basis difference in fixed assets		(32,000	)		(38,000	)
Net deferred tax assets		7,745,000			7,537,000
Valuation allowance		(7,745,000	)		(7,537,000	)
Total reported deferred tax assets	$	—		$	—

The Company has provided a valuation allowance equal to 100% of the net deferred tax asset in recognition of the uncertainty regarding the ultimate amount of the net deferred tax asset that will be realized.

At September 30, 2010 the Company had approximately $21,731,000 of federal operating loss carry-forwards, respectively, available to offset future taxable income, which expires on various dates through 2030. Ownership changes as defined in the Internal Revenue Code may limit the amount of net operating loss and tax credit carry-forwards that may be utilized annually. The Company also had Brazilian net operating loss carry-forwards of approximately $655,000 available to offset future Brazilian taxable income.

NOTE 13—SIGNIFICANT SALES AND CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK

Revenues derived from export sales, excluding sales to the company’s subsidiary in Brazil, from continuing operations, amounted to approximately $1,157,000 or 22% of total sales in 2010 and $1,378,000, or 24% of total sales in 2009. Export sales to Europe were approximately $759,000 or 14% of total sales in 2010 and $992,000 or 18% of total sales in 2009. Sales to the Company’s Brazilian subsidiary, which are eliminated in the consolidated financial statements, were approximately $1,206,000 and $1,062,000 in 2010 and 2009, respectively.

At September 30, 2010 and 2009, the Company had approximately $107,723 and $125,900 of cash in foreign bank accounts.

NOTE 14—GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION

The Company considers its manufactured kits, tests and instruments as one operating segment, as defined under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131 “Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information.”

F-18

Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED

For The Years Ending September 30, 2010 and 2009

The following table sets forth revenue and assets, for continuing operations, by geographic location.

	United States*		Brazil		Consolidated
September 30, 2010:
Revenues	$	2,626,939	$	2,593,231	$	5,220,170
Long-lived assets		239,607		361,301		600,908
September 30, 2009:
Revenues	$	3,228,975	$	2,189,953	$	5,418,928
Long-lived assets		454,467		443,841		898,308

* Includes export sales to countries other than Brazil of approximately $1,157,000 and $1,358,000 in 2010 and 2009, respectively.

The long-lived assets include property and equipment, intangibles, and long-term notes receivable, net of any depreciation and amortization.

NOTE 15—COMMITMENTS

The Company leases certain facilities and equipment under non-cancelable operating leases lasting through 2012. Future minimum lease commitments under the non-cancelable operating leases are as follows:

Years ending September 30,
2011			238,889
2012			181,814
2013			—
2014			—
2015			—

Rent expense from continuing operations was approximately $389,000 and $357,000 for 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Employee Benefit Plans

The Company maintains a defined contribution retirement plan, which qualifies under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, covering substantially all employees. Participant contributions and employer matching contributions are made as defined in the 401(k) Plan agreement. The Company’s policy is to contribute to the ESOP plan rather than to match 401K contributions. As such, effective October 1, 2003, the Company created an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) for the benefit of its employees, which has been determined by the Internal Revenue Service to be a qualified retirement plan subject to section 4975(E)7 of the Code. The Employer has no obligations to contribute any amount under this plan except as so determined at its sole discretion. Employees are eligible to participate in the ESOP after 90 days of active employment and fully vest in the benefits after five years of service. The Company’s contributions to the ESOP were $10,000 in cash during fiscal year 2010 and 200,000 shares of common stock for fiscal year 2009. The compensation committee of the Board of Directors approves all contributions to the ESOP plan. At September 30, 2010 and 2009, the ESOP owned approximately 792,880 shares and 485,478 shares of Hemagen common stock, respectively, that were either purchased in the open market by the ESOP, or contributed by the company to the ESOP. As of September 30, 2010 the ESOP plan had $5,158 of cash available to purchase additional shares in the open market. The shares owned by the ESOP, approximately 792,880, represent approximately 5% of the shares outstanding.

F-19

Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED

For The Years Ending September 30, 2010 and 2009

Directors Plan

The Company maintains a Rule 10b5-1 Stock Purchase Plan (the 10b5-1 Plan) for its Non-employee Directors for which the company deposited cash as part of the directors compensation plan. Effective October 1, 2008, the director compensation plan changed and the Non-employee Directors now receive a $2,500 cash payment and 2,500 shares of the Company’s common stock each quarter. The 10b5-1 Plan will continue to purchase shares in the open market until the cash balance is depleted.

NOTE 16—NET LOSS PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK

Basic earnings per share excludes the effect of any dilutive options or convertible securities and is computed by dividing the net income (loss) by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing the net income (loss) by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding, unless the impact of those equivalents is antidilutive. The computation of weighted average shares outstanding for fiscal years 2010 and 2009 is as follows:

	2010		2009
Common shares outstanding for basic EPS		15,454,103		15,234,651
Shares issued upon assumed exercise of outstanding stock options		—		—
Weighted average number of common and common equivalent shares outstanding for diluted EPS		15,454,103		15,234,651

Common share equivalents outstanding at September 30, 2010 and 2009 totaling 14,503,208 and 12,578,208 shares, respectively, including currently outstanding stock options and convertible debt, were not included in the denominator for diluted income per share as their effect was anti-dilutive.

NOTE 17—DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

During fiscal 2008 the Company sold the assets of its wholly-owed subsidiary Reagents Applications, Inc. The results of the operations for this division have been presented as discontinued operations in the accompanying financial statements for the periods ending September 30, 2010 and September 30, 2009.

F-20

Hemagen Diagnostics, Inc. and Subsidiaries

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS—CONTINUED

For The Years Ending September 30, 2010 and 2009

Results from discontinued operations, net of income tax, for the periods ending September 30, 2009 and 2008 are as follows:

	2010		2009
Net sales		—	$	129,695
Costs of sales		—		207,894
Gross Profit		—		(78,199	)
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative		—		—
Research and development		—		—
Total operating costs and expenses		—		—
Operating loss		—		(78,199	)
Other income (expenses):
Interest Income (net)		—		—
Other Income (expense)		—		—
Total other income (expense)		—		—
Net income (loss) before income taxes		—		(78,199	)
Income Tax		—		—
Net (loss) income from discontinued operations		—	$	(78,199	)

Cost of sales during 2009 includes approximately $78,000 of additional reserves recorded for remaining Raichem inventory being sold under an Inventory Purchase Agreement. In the Inventory Purchase Agreement the Company agreed to sell the inventory from this division to the purchaser at cost, less any overhead charges.

NOTE 18—SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH

September 30,	2010		2009
Cash paid for interest	$	365,325	$	379,938
Cash paid for income taxes (Brazil)	$	89,579	$	20,821
Total PP&E purchases	$	74,142	$	114,888
Financed portion of equipment purchases		—		—
Cash paid for PP&E purchases	$	74,142	$	114,888

F-21

Date: December 23, 2010

HEMAGEN DIAGNOSTICS, INC.

/s/ WILLIAM P. HALES

William P. Hales, Chairman of the Board,

President & Chief Executive Officer

Filing Compare · HEMAGEN DIAGNOSTICS INC