UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ~~2014~~2015

— OR —

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 1-34544

Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware		26-1191638
(State of organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

1601 Bryan Street, Dallas, TX 75201-3411		(214) 812-4600
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)		(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-Accelerated filer x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

At ~~March~~February 3129, ~~2015~~2016, the outstanding membership interest in Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC was directly held by Energy Future Holdings Corp.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE - None

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		PAGE
Glossary		ii
	PART I
Items 1. and 2.	BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES	1
Item1A.	RISK FACTORS	6
Item1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	1816
Item 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	1816
Item 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	1816
	PART II
Item 5.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED EQUITY HOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	1917
Item 6.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	1918
Item 7.	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	2120
Item 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	3331
Item 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	3634
Item 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	6766
Item 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	6766
Item 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION	7169
	PART III
Item 10.	MANAGERS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	7270
Item 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	7673
Item 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	7874
Item 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND MANAGER INDEPENDENCE	7975
Item 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES	8278
	PART IV
Item 15.	EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	8480

Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC's (EFIH) annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to those reports are made available to the public, free of charge, on the Energy Future Holdings Corp. (EFH Corp.) website at http://www.energyfutureholdings.com as soon as reasonably practicable after they have been filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. The information on EFH Corp.'s website shall not be deemed a part of, or incorporated by reference into, this annual report on Form 10-K. The representations and warranties contained in any agreement that EFIH has filed as an exhibit to this annual report on Form 10-K or that EFIH has or may publicly file in the future may contain representations and warranties made by and to the parties thereto at specific dates. Such representations and warranties may be subject to exceptions and qualifications contained in separate disclosure schedules, may represent the parties' risk allocation in the particular transaction, or may be qualified by materiality standards that differ from what may be viewed as material for securities law purposes.

This annual report on Form 10-K and other Securities and Exchange Commission filings of EFIH and its subsidiaries occasionally make references to EFIH (or "the ~~company~~Company"), EFH Corp., Oncor Holdings or Oncor when describing actions, rights or obligations of their respective subsidiaries. These references reflect the fact that the subsidiaries are consolidated with, or otherwise reflected in, their respective parent company's financial statements for financial reporting purposes. However, these references should not be interpreted to imply that the relevant parent company is actually undertaking the action or has the rights or obligations of the relevant subsidiary company or vice versa.

GLOSSARY

When the following terms and abbreviations appear in the text of this report, they have the meanings indicated below.

Bankruptcy Filing		Voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code (Bankruptcy Code) in the US Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (Bankruptcy Court) filed on April 29, 2014 by the Debtors
CREZ		Competitive Renewable Energy Zone
DIP Facilities		Refers, collectively, to EFIH's debtor-in-possession financing (see Note 6 to the Financial Statements) and TCEH's debtor-in-possession financing (TCEH DIP Facility).
Chapter 11 Cases		Cases being heard in the US Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (Bankruptcy Court) concerning voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the US Bankruptcy Code (Bankruptcy Code) filed on April 29, 2014 by the Debtors
Confirmation Order		The Bankruptcy Court's December 2015 order confirming the Plan of Reorganization
DIP Facility		Refers to EFIH's debtor-in-possession financing (see Note 8 to the FinancialStatements).
Debtors		EFH Corp. and the substantial majority of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including EFIH, EFCH and TCEH but excluding the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities
EBITDA		earnings (net income) before interest expense, income taxes, depreciation and amortization
Disclosure Statement		Fifth Amended Disclosure Statement for the Debtors' Fifth Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code approved by the Bankruptcy Court in September 2015
EFCH		Energy Future Competitive Holdings Company LLC, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of EFH Corp. and the direct parent of TCEH, and/or its subsidiaries, depending on context
EFH Acquisition		The acquisition of reorganized EFH Corp. financed by existing TCEH creditors and third-party investors as proposed in the Plan of Reorganization
EFH Corp.		Energy Future Holdings Corp., a holding company, and/or its subsidiaries, depending on context, whose major subsidiaries include TCEH and Oncor
EFH Corp. 10.875% Notes		EFH Corp.'s 10.875% Senior Notes with a maturity date of November 1, 2017, which are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by EFIH and EFCH as discussed in Note 8 to the Financial Statements
EFH Corp. Toggle Notes		EFH Corp.'s 11.25%/12.00% Senior Toggle Notes with a maturity date of November 1, 2017, which are guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by EFIH and EFCH as discussed in Note 89 to the Financial Statements
EFIH		Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of EFH Corp. and the direct parent of Oncor Holdings, and/or its subsidiaries depending on context.
EFIH Debtors		EFIH and EFIH Finance
EFIH Finance		EFIH Finance Inc., a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of EFIH, formed for the sole purpose of serving as co-issuer with EFIH of certain debt securities
EFIH First Lien Notes		~~Refers, collectively, to~~ EFIH's and EFIH Finance's $503 million principal amount of 6.875% Senior Secured First Lien Notes and $3.482 billion principal amount of 10.000% Senior Secured First Lien Notes., collectively
EFIH Second Lien Notes		Refers, collectively, to EFIH's and EFIH Finance's $406 million principal amount of 11% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes and $1.75 billion principal amount of 11.75% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes.
EFIH PIK Notes		EFIH's and EFIH Finance's $1.566 billion principal amount of 11.25%/12.25% Senior Toggle Notes
EFIH PIK Notes		EFIH's $1.566 billion principal amount of 11.25%/12.25% Senior Toggle Notes.
EFIH Second Lien Notes		EFIH's and EFIH Finance's $406 million principal amount of 11% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes and $1.75 billion principal amount of 11.75% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes, collectively
EPA		US Environmental Protection Agency
ERCOT		Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc., the independent system operator and the regional coordinator of various electricity systems within Texas
ERISA		Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended
Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreements		EFH Corp. and certain of its subsidiaries (including EFCH, EFIH and TCEH, but not including Oncor Holdings and Oncor) are parties to a Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement, executed on May 15, 2012 but effective as of January 1, 2010. EFH Corp., Oncor Holdings, Oncor, Oncor's third-party minority investor, and Oncor Management Investment LLC are parties to a separate Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement dated November 5, 2008. See Note 4 to the Financial Statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis, under Financial Condition.
GAAP		generally accepted accounting principles
LIBOR		London Interbank Offered Rate, an interest rate at which banks can borrow funds, in marketable size, from other banks in the London interbank market

Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreements		EFH Corp. and certain of its subsidiaries (including EFCH, EFIH and TCEH, but not including Oncor Holdings and Oncor) are parties to a Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement, executed on May 15, 2012 but effective as of January 1, 2010. EFH Corp., Oncor Holdings, Oncor, Texas Transmission, and Oncor Management Investment LLC are parties to a separate Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement dated November 5, 2008. See Note 5 to the Financial statements and Management's Discussion and Analysis, under Financial Condition.
GAAP		generally accepted accounting principles
LIBOR		London Interbank Offered Rate, an interest rate at which banks can borrow funds, in marketable size, from other banks in the London interbank market
Luminant		subsidiaries of TCEH engaged in competitive market activities consisting of electricity generation and wholesale energy sales and purchases as well as commodity risk management and trading activities, all largely in Texas
Merger		the transaction referred to in the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated February 25, 2007, under which Texas Holdings agreed to acquire EFH Corp., which was completed on October 10, 2007
MW		megawatts
NERC		North American Electric Reliability Corporation
Oncor		Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC, a direct, majority owned subsidiary of Oncor Holdings, and/or its wholly owned consolidated bankruptcy-remote financing subsidiary, Oncor Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC, depending on context, that is engaged in regulated electricity transmission and distribution activities
Oncor Holdings		Oncor Electric Delivery Holdings Company LLC, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of EFIH and the direct majority owner of Oncor, and/or its subsidiaries, depending on context
Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities		Oncor Holdings and its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including Oncor
Oncor Tax Sharing Agreement		Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement among EFH Corp., Oncor Holdings, Oncor and Texas Transmission
Petition Date		April 29, 2014, the date the Debtors made the Bankruptcy Filing
Plan of Reorganization		Sixth Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization, as amended, Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court in December 2015, including the Plan Supplement
Plan Support Agreement		Third Amendment to the Amended and Restated Plan Support Agreement, entered into in December 2015, amending and restating the Plan Support Agreement approved by the Bankruptcy Court in September 2015
PUCT		Public Utility Commission of Texas
PURA		Texas Public Utility Regulatory Act
RSA		Restructuring Support and Lock-Up Agreement
REP		retail electric provider
SEC		US Securities and Exchange Commission
Securities Act		Securities Act of 1933, as amended
SG&A		selling, general and administrative
Settlement Agreement		Amended and Restated Settlement Agreement among the Debtors, the Sponsor Group, settling TCEH first lien creditors, settling TCEH second lien creditors, settling TCEH unsecured creditors and the official committee of unsecured creditors of TCEH (collectively, the Settling Parties), filed by the Debtors with the Bankruptcy Court in December 2015. See Note 2 to the Financial Statements.
Settlement Agreement Order		The Bankruptcy Court's December 2015 order approving the Settlement Agreement
Sponsor Group		Refers, collectively, to certain investment funds affiliated with Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P., TPG Global, LLC (together with its affiliates, TPG) and GS Capital Partners, an affiliate of Goldman, Sachs & Co., that have an ownership interest in Texas Holdings.
TCEH		Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of EFCH and an indirect subsidiary of EFH Corp., and/or its subsidiaries, depending on context, that are engaged in electricity generation and wholesale and retail energy markets activities, and whose major subsidiaries include Luminant and TXU Energy
TCEH Demand Notes		Refers to certain loans from TCEH to EFH Corp. in the form of demand notes to finance EFH Corp. debt principal and interest payments and, until April 2011, other general corporate purposes of EFH Corp. that were guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by EFCH and EFIH and were settled by EFH Corp. in January 2013.
TCEQ		Texas Commission on Environmental Quality
Texas Holdings		Texas Energy Future Holdings Limited Partnership, a limited partnership controlled by the Sponsor Group, that owns substantially all of the common stock of EFH Corp.
Texas Holdings Group		Texas Holdings and its direct and indirect subsidiaries other than the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities
TRE		Texas Reliability Entity, Inc., an independent organization that develops reliability standards for the ERCOT region and monitors and enforces compliance with NERC standards and monitors compliance with ERCOT protocols
TXU Energy		TXU Energy Retail Company LLC, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of TCEH that is a REP in competitive areas of ERCOT and is engaged in the retail sale of electricity to residential and business customers
US		United States of America
VIE		variable interest entity

iii



TCEH		Texas Competitive Electric Holdings Company LLC, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of EFCH and an indirect subsidiary of EFH Corp., and/or its subsidiaries, depending on context, that are engaged in electricity generation and wholesale and retail energy markets activities, and whose major subsidiaries include Luminant and TXU Energy

TCEH Demand Notes		Refers to certain loans from TCEH to EFH Corp. in the form of demand notes to finance EFH Corp. debt principal and interest payments and, until April 2011, other general corporate purposes of EFH Corp. that were guaranteed on a senior unsecured basis by EFCH and EFIH and were settled by EFH Corp. in January 2013.

TCEQ		Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Texas Holdings		Texas Energy Future Holdings Limited Partnership, a limited partnership controlled by the Sponsor Group, that owns substantially all of the common stock of EFH Corp.

Texas Holdings Group		Texas Holdings and its direct and indirect subsidiaries other than the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities

Texas Transmission		Texas Transmission Investment LLC, a limited liability company that owns a 19.75% equity interest in Oncor and is not affiliated with EFH Corp., any of EFH Corp.'s subsidiaries or any member of the Sponsor Group

TRE		Texas Reliability Entity, Inc., an independent organization that develops reliability standards for the ERCOT region and monitors and enforces compliance with NERC standards and monitors compliance with ERCOT protocols

TXU Energy		TXU Energy Retail Company LLC, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of TCEH that is a REP in competitive areas of ERCOT and is engaged in the retail sale of electricity to residential and business customers

US		United States of America

VIE		variable interest entity

PART I.

Items 1. and 2. BUSINESS AND PROPERTIES

References in this report to "the ~~company~~Company" are to EFIH and/or its direct and indirect subsidiaries as apparent in the context. See Glossary for defined terms.

Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC Business ~~and Strategy~~

EFIH, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of EFH Corp., is a Dallas, Texas-based holding company whose wholly owned subsidiary, Oncor Holdings, holds a majority interest (approximately 80%) in Oncor. The business and strategy of Oncor is discussed below, as the investment in Oncor represents ~~a substantial portion of~~ the ~~net~~primary ~~assets~~asset and earnings of EFIH. Oncor is a regulated electricity transmission and distribution company principally engaged in providing delivery services to REPs, including subsidiaries of TCEH, that sell electricity to residential, business and other consumers in Texas. Revenues from services provided to TCEH represented approximately 25% ~~and 27%~~ of Oncor's total consolidated revenues for each of the years ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013, respectively~~2014. EFIH has no reportable business segments. See Notes 1 and 3 to the Financial Statements for a discussion of the reporting of EFIH's investment in Oncor Holdings as an equity method investment and a description of the ring-fencing measures implemented with respect to Oncor Holdings and Oncor. These measures were put in place to further enhance Oncor's credit quality and mitigate Oncor's and Oncor Holdings' exposure to the Texas Holdings Group with the intent to minimize the risk that a court would order any of the assets and liabilities of the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities to be substantively consolidated with those of any member of the Texas Holdings Group in the event any such member were to become a debtor in a bankruptcy case. Accordingly, EFH Corp. and EFIH do not control and do not consolidate Oncor Holdings and Oncor for financial reporting purposes.

EFIH's sources of liquidity have included the ~~EFIH~~ DIP Facility, dividends received from Oncor Holdings and interest payments received on EFH Corp. and TCEH debt it holds. Its uses of liquidity have consisted of reorganization costs, interest payments on the ~~EFIH~~ DIP Facility and EFIH's outstanding debt and income taxes paid to EFH Corp. under a Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement.

Chapter 11 Cases

On April 29, 2014 (the Petition Date), EFH Corp. and the substantial majority of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including EFIH, EFCH and TCEH but excluding the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities, (the Debtors), filed voluntary petitions for relief (the Bankruptcy Filing) under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the Bankruptcy Code) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the Bankruptcy Court). During the pendency of the Bankruptcy Filing (~~the~~ Chapter 11 Cases), the Debtors have operated and will continue to operate their businesses as debtors-in-possession under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. In December 2015, the Bankruptcy Court entered the Confirmation Order approving the Debtors' Plan of Reorganization. The effectiveness of the Plan of Reorganization and EFIH's emergence from the Chapter 11 Cases is subject to several events and conditions that are not within its control. As a result, EFIH cannot predict whether the Plan of Reorganization will become effective and/or when it will ultimately emerge from the Chapter 11 Cases

Consistent with the ring-fencing measures discussed above, the assets and liabilities of the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities have not been, and are not expected to be, substantively consolidated with the assets and liabilities of the Debtors in the Chapter 11 Cases.

For additional discussion of the Chapter 11 Cases and the effects on ~~EFIH~~us, see Note 2 to the Financial Statements and Item 1A, Risk Factors – Risks Related to Chapter 11 Cases. See Note 68 to the Financial Statements for discussion of the DIP ~~Facilities~~Facility.

Oncor's Business

Oncor's transmission and distribution assets are located principally in the north-central, eastern and western parts of Texas. This territory comprises 91 counties and more than 400 incorporated municipalities, including Dallas/Fort Worth and surrounding suburbs, as well as Waco, Wichita Falls, Odessa, Midland, Tyler and Killeen. Oncor is not a seller of electricity, nor does it purchase electricity for resale. It provides transmission services to other electricity distribution companies, cooperatives, ~~municipalities~~ and ~~REPs~~municipalities. It also provides distribution services to REPs, including subsidiaries of TCEH, which sell electricity to residential, business and other consumers. Oncor's transmission and distribution rates are regulated by the PUCT, and in certain instances, the FERC. Oncor is also subject to the requirements of the ERCOT Nodal Protocols as well as reliability standards adopted and enforced by the TRE and the NERC, including NERC CIP standards.

Oncor operates the largest transmission and distribution system in Texas, delivering electricity to more than 3.3 million homes and businesses and operating more than 121,000 miles of transmission and distribution lines. Most of Oncor's power lines have been constructed over lands of others pursuant to easements or along public highways, streets and rights-of-way as permitted by law. At December 31, 2014, Oncor had approximately 3,410 full-time employees, including approximately 640 employees under collective bargaining agreements.

Oncor operates the largest transmission and distribution system in Texas, delivering electricity to more than 3.3 million homes and businesses and operating more than 121,000 miles of transmission and distribution lines. Most of Oncor's power lines have been constructed over lands of others pursuant to easements or along public highways, streets and rights-of-way as permitted by law. At December 31, 2015, Oncor had approximately 3,520 full-time employees, including approximately 670 employees under collective bargaining agreements.

Oncor's Market

Oncor operates within the ERCOT electricity market. This market represents approximately 90% of the electricity consumption in Texas. ERCOT is the regional reliability coordinating organization for member electricity systems in Texas and the Independent System Operator of the interconnected transmission grid for those systems. ERCOT is responsible for ensuring reliability, adequacy and security of the electric systems as well as nondiscriminatory access to transmission service by all wholesale market participants in the ~~ERCOT~~ region. ERCOT's membership consists of approximately 300 corporate and associate members, including electric cooperatives, municipal power agencies, independent generators, independent power marketers, transmission service providers and distribution services providers, independent REPs and consumers.

In ~~2014~~2015, ERCOT's hourly electricity demand peaked at 6669,~~454~~877 MW as compared to the peak hourly demand of 6766,~~245~~454 MW in ~~2013~~2014. The ERCOT market has limited interconnections to other markets in the US and Mexico, which currently limits potential imports into and exports out of the ERCOT market to 1,~~100~~120 MW of generation capacity (or approximately 2% of peak demand). In addition, wholesale transactions within the ERCOT market are generally not subject to regulation by the FERC.

The ERCOT market operates under reliability standards set by NERC. The PUCT has primary jurisdiction over the ERCOT market to ensure the adequacy and reliability of power supply across Texas' main interconnected transmission grid. Oncor, along with other owners of transmission and distribution facilities in Texas, assists ERCOT in its operations. Oncor has planning, design, construction, operation and maintenance responsibility for the portion of the transmission grid and for the load-serving substations it owns, primarily within its certificated distribution service area. Oncor participates with ERCOT and other ERCOT utilities in obtaining regulatory approvals and planning, designing, constructing and upgrading transmission lines in order to remove existing constraints and interconnect generation on the ERCOT transmission grid. The transmission line projects are necessary to meet reliability needs, support energy production and increase bulk power transfer capability.

Oncor's ~~Strategies~~Business Focus

Oncor focuses on delivering electricity in a safe and reliable manner, minimizing service interruptions and investing in its transmission and distribution infrastructure to maintain its system, and serve its growing customer base with a modernized grid and support energy production.

Oncor believes that building and leveraging upon opportunities to scale its operating advantage and technology programs enables Oncor to create value by eliminating duplicative costs, efficiently managing supply costs, and building and standardizing distinctive process expertise over a larger grid. Scale also allows Oncor to take part in large capital investments in its transmission and distribution system, with a smaller fraction of overall capital at risk and with an enhanced ability to streamline costs. Oncor's growth strategies are to invest in technology upgrades, and to construct transmission and distribution facilities to meet the needs of the growing Texas market and support energy production. Oncor and other transmission and distribution businesses in ERCOT benefit from regulatory capital recovery mechanisms known as "capital trackers" that Oncor believes enable adequate and more timely recovery of transmission, distribution and advanced metering investments through its regulated rates.

Oncor's Operations

Performance — Oncor achieved or exceeded market performance protocols in 12 out of 14 PUCT market metrics in ~~2014~~2015. These metrics measure the success of transmission and distribution companies in facilitating customer transactions in the competitive Texas electricity market.

Investing in Infrastructure and Technology — In 2015, Oncor invested approximately $1.2 billion in its network to upgrade the transmission system and associated facilities, to extend the distribution infrastructure and to pursue certain initiatives in infrastructure maintenance and information technology.

Investing in Infrastructure and Technology — In 2014, Oncor invested approximately $1.1 billion in its network to construct, rebuild and upgrade transmission lines and associated facilities, to extend the distribution infrastructure and to pursue certain initiatives in infrastructure maintenance and information technology.

Oncor's technology upgrade initiatives include development of a modernized grid through advanced digital communication, data management, real-time monitoring and outage detection capabilities to take advantage of Oncor's deployment of advanced digital metering equipment. This modernized grid is producing electricity service reliability improvements and providing for additional products and services from REPs that enable businesses and consumers to better manage their electricity usage and costs.

Electricity Transmission — Oncor's electricity transmission business is responsible for the safe and reliable operations of its transmission network and substations. These responsibilities consist of the construction and maintenance of transmission facilities and substations and the monitoring, controlling and dispatching of high-voltage electricity over Oncor's transmission facilities in coordination with ERCOT.

Oncor is a member of ERCOT, and its transmission business actively assists the operations of ERCOT and market participants. Through its transmission business, Oncor participates with ERCOT and other member utilities to plan, design, construct and operate new transmission lines, with regulatory approval, necessary to maintain reliability, interconnect to merchant generation facilities, increase bulk power transfer capability and minimize limitations and constraints on the ERCOT transmission grid.

Transmission revenues are provided under tariffs approved by either the PUCT or, to a small degree related to an interconnection to other markets, the FERC. ~~Network transmission revenues compensate Oncor for delivery of electricity over transmission facilities operating at 60 kilovolt (kV) and above.~~ Other services offered by Oncor through its transmission business include system impact studies, facilities studies, transformation service and maintenance of transformer equipment, substations and transmission lines owned by other parties.

PURA allows Oncor to update its transmission rates periodically to reflect changes in invested capital. This capital tracker provision encourages investment in the transmission system to help ensure reliability and efficiency by allowing for timely recovery of and return on new transmission investments.

At December 31, ~~2014~~2015, Oncor's transmission facilities included 6,~~447~~410 circuit miles of 345kV transmission lines and 9,~~634~~536 circuit miles of 138kV and 69kV transmission lines. Sixty-~~seven~~nine generation facilities totaling 36,~~410~~991 MW were directly connected to Oncor's transmission system at December 31, ~~2014~~2015, and ~~292~~298 transmission stations and ~~715~~717 distribution substations were served from Oncor's transmission system.

At December 31, ~~2014~~2015, Oncor's transmission facilities had the following connections to other transmission grids in Texas:

	Number of Interconnected Lines
Grid Connections	345kV	138kV	69kV
Brazos Electric Power Cooperative, Inc.	8	~~113~~112	2325
Rayburn Country Electric Cooperative, Inc.	—	3940	6
Lower Colorado River Authority	109	2327	2
Texas New Mexico Power	4	10	12
Tex-La Electric Cooperative of Texas, Inc.	—	12	1
American Electric Power Company, Inc. (a)	5	75	118
Texas Municipal Power Agency	7	6	—
Lone Star Transmission	12	—	—
Centerpoint Energy Inc.	8	—	—
Sharyland Utilities, L.P.	—1	84	—
Electric Transmission Texas, LLC	68	1	—
Other small systems operating wholly within Texas	6	76	3

___________


(a)	One of the 345kV lines is an asynchronous high-voltage direct current connection with the Southwest Power Pool.

Electricity Distribution — Oncor's electricity distribution business is responsible for the overall safe and efficient operation of distribution facilities, including electricity delivery, power quality and system reliability. These responsibilities consist of the ownership, management, construction, maintenance and operation of the distribution system within Oncor's certificated service area. Oncor's distribution system receives electricity from the transmission system through substations and distributes electricity to end-users and wholesale customers through 3,237 distribution feeders.

The Oncor distribution system included over 3.3 million points of delivery at December 31, 2015. Over the past five years, the number of distribution system points of delivery served by Oncor, excluding lighting sites, grew an average of 1.39% per year. Oncor added approximately 49,200 points of delivery in 2015.

The Oncor distribution system consists of 56,956 miles of overhead primary conductors, 21,323 miles of overhead secondary and street light conductors, 16,834 miles of underground primary conductors and 10,415 miles of underground secondary and street light conductors. The majority of the distribution system operates at 25kV and 12.5kV.

The Oncor distribution system included over 3.3 million points of delivery at December 31, 2014. Over the past five years, the number of distribution system points of delivery served by Oncor, excluding lighting sites, grew an average of 1.28% per year. Oncor added approximately 49,100 points of delivery in 2014.

The Oncor distribution system consists of 56,907 miles of overhead primary conductors, 21,541 miles of overhead secondary and street light conductors, 16,517 miles of underground primary conductors and 10,203 miles of underground secondary and street light conductors. The majority of the distribution system operates at 25kV and 12.5kV.

Oncor's distribution revenues from residential and small business users are based on actual monthly consumption (kWh), and, depending on size and annual load factor, revenues from large commercial and industrial users are based either on actual monthly demand (kilowatts) or the greater of actual monthly demand (kilowatts) or 80% of peak monthly demand during the prior eleven months.

The PUCT allows Oncor to file, under certain circumstances, up to four rate adjustments between rate reviews to recover distribution-related investments on an interim basis. Oncor has not filed any such distribution-related rate adjustments to date.

Customers — Oncor's transmission customers consist of municipalities, electric cooperatives and other distribution companies. Oncor's distribution customers consist of approximately 80 REPs, including TCEH's retail sales operations and certain electric cooperatives in Oncor's certificated service area. Revenues from services provided to TCEH represented approximately 25% of Oncor's total reported consolidated revenues for ~~2014~~2015. Revenues from REP subsidiaries of one nonaffiliated entity, ~~NRG Energy, Inc.,~~ collectively represented 16approximately 17% of Oncor's total reported consolidated revenues for ~~2014~~2015. No other customer represented more than 10% of Oncor's total operating revenues. ~~The~~Generally, the consumers of the electricity delivered by Oncor are free to choose their electricity supplier from REPs who compete for their business.

Seasonality — Oncor's revenues and results of operations are subject to seasonality, weather conditions and other electricity usage drivers, with revenues being highest in the summer.

Regulation and Rates — As its operations are wholly within Texas, Oncor is not a public utility as defined in the Federal Power Act and, as a result, it is not subject to general regulation under that Act. However, Oncor is subject to reliability standards adopted and enforced by the TRE and the NERC, including NERC CIP standards, under the Federal Power Act.

The PUCT has original jurisdiction over transmission and distribution rates and services in unincorporated areas and in those municipalities that have ceded original jurisdiction to the PUCT and has exclusive appellate jurisdiction to review the rate and service orders and ordinances of municipalities. Generally, PURA prohibits the collection of any rates or charges by a public utility (as defined by PURA) that does not have the prior approval of the appropriate regulatory authority (i.e., the PUCT or the municipality with original jurisdiction).

At the state level, PURA requires owners or operators of transmission facilities to provide open-access wholesale transmission services to third parties at rates and terms that are nondiscriminatory and comparable to the rates and terms of the utility's own use of its system. The PUCT has adopted rules implementing the state open-access requirements for all utilities that are subject to the PUCT's jurisdiction over transmission services, including Oncor.

Securitization Bonds — Oncor's operations include its wholly owned, bankruptcy-remote financing subsidiary, Oncor Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC. This financing subsidiary was organized for the limited purpose of issuing certain securitization (transition) bonds in 2003 and 2004. Oncor Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC issued $1.3 billion principal amount of transition bonds to recover generation-related regulatory asset stranded costs and other qualified costs under an order issued by the PUCT in 2002. At December 31, ~~2014~~2015, aggregate principal amounts of transition bonds outstanding, which mature in ~~2015~~May ~~and~~ 2016, totaled $~~180~~41 million. ~~See Note 12 to the Financial Statements for discussion of agreements between TCEH and Oncor regarding payment of interest and incremental taxes related to these bonds that were settled in 2012.~~

Environmental Regulations and Related Considerations

Water

The TCEQ and the EPA have jurisdiction over water discharges (including storm water) from facilities in Texas. Oncor believes its facilities are presently in material compliance with applicable state and federal requirements relating to discharge of pollutants into water. Oncor believes it holds all required waste water discharge permits from the TCEQ for facilities in operation and has applied for or obtained necessary permits for facilities under construction. Oncor also believes it can satisfy the requirements necessary to obtain any required permits or renewals. There are also federal rules pertaining to Spill Prevention, Control and Countermeasure (SPCC) plans for oil-filled electrical equipment and bulk storage facilities for oil that affect certain of Oncor's facilities. Oncor has implemented SPCC plans as required for those substations, work centers and distribution systems, and believes it is currently in material compliance with these rules.

Solid Waste

Treatment, storage and disposal of solid waste and hazardous waste are regulated at the state level under the Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act and at the federal level under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended, and the Toxic Substances Control Act. The EPA has issued regulations under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 and the Toxic Substances Control Act, and the TCEQ has issued regulations under the Texas Solid Waste Disposal Act applicable to Oncor's facilities. Oncor believes it is in material compliance with applicable solid and hazardous waste regulations.

Environmental Capital Expenditures

Oncor's capital expenditures for environmental matters totaled $10 million in 2014 and are expected to total approximately $8 million in 2015.


Item 1A.	RISK FACTORS

Important factors, in addition to others specifically addressed in Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, that could have a material impact on EFIH's operations, liquidity, financial results and financial condition, or could cause its actual results or outcomes to differ materially from any projected outcome contained in any forward-looking statement in this report, are described below. There may be further risks and uncertainties that are not currently known or that are not currently believed to be material that may adversely affect EFIH's operations, liquidity and/or financial condition in the future.

Risks Related to Chapter 11 Cases

EFIH has filed voluntary petitions for relief under the Bankruptcy Code and is subject to the risks and uncertainties associated with bankruptcy cases.

EFIH (together with its parent company, EFH Corp., and substantially all of the direct and indirect subsidiaries of EFH Corp. including EFCH and TCEH but excluding the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities) has filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. For the duration of the Chapter 11 Cases, EFIH will be subject to various risks, including but not limited to the following:

• ~~EFIH's~~Whether ~~ability~~the toconditions ~~develop,~~(including ~~file~~the ~~and~~receipt ~~complete a Chapter 11 plan~~ of ~~reorganization,~~required ~~particularly~~regulatory ~~during~~approvals) ~~the~~to ~~exclusivity~~consummate ~~period (i.e., in general~~ the ~~period~~transactions incontemplated ~~which~~by ~~EFIH has~~ the ~~exclusive~~Plan ~~right~~of toReorganization ~~file~~will abe ~~Chapter~~satisfied 11or ~~plan of reorganization)~~waived;

• ~~EFIH's~~Negative ~~ability~~effects ~~to obtain Bankruptcy Court, creditor~~ and ~~regulatory~~increased ~~approval~~costs of a ~~Chapter~~prolonged 11duration ~~plan~~ of ~~reorganization~~the inChapter a11 ~~timely manner~~Cases;

• EFIH's ability to maintain or obtain ~~Bankruptcy~~sufficient ~~Court~~financing ~~approval~~sources ~~with~~for ~~respect~~its tooperations ~~motions~~during inthe pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases ~~and~~or ~~the~~to ~~outcomes~~obtain ofsufficient ~~Bankruptcy~~exit ~~Court~~financing ~~rulings~~to ~~and~~fund the Plan of ~~the~~Reorganization ~~Chapter~~or 11any ~~Cases~~other inplan ~~general~~of reorganization;

• ~~Risks~~Potential ~~associated~~incremental ~~with~~increase ~~third party motions~~ in ~~the~~risks ~~Chapter~~related 11to ~~Cases,~~distributions ~~which~~from ~~may~~Oncor ~~interfere with EFIH's ability~~ to ~~propose~~EFH ~~and/~~Corp. or ~~complete a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization~~EFIH;

• ~~Increased~~Potential ~~costs~~increased ~~related~~difficulty toin retaining and motivating EFIH's key employees through the ~~Chapter~~process 11of ~~Cases~~reorganization, and ~~related~~potential ~~litigation;~~increased difficulty in attracting new employees, and

• ~~EFIH's~~Significant ~~ability~~time and effort required to ~~maintain~~be orspent ~~obtain~~by ~~sufficient~~EFIH's ~~financing~~senior ~~sources~~management toin ~~fund~~dealing awith the Chapter 11 ~~plan~~Cases ofrather ~~reorganization;~~than focusing exclusively on business operations.

•EFIH ~~Potential~~is ~~incremental~~also ~~increase~~subject into risks ~~related~~and uncertainties with respect to ~~distributions~~the ~~from~~actions ~~Oncor;~~and decisions of creditors, regulators and other third parties who have interests in our Chapter 11 Cases that may be inconsistent with our plans. These risks and uncertainties could affect our business and operations in various ways and may significantly increase the duration of the Chapter 11 Cases. Because of the risks and uncertainties associated with Chapter 11 Cases, EFIH cannot predict or quantify the ultimate impact that events occurring during the Chapter 11 Cases may have on our business, cash flows, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

• The ~~outcome~~Plan of ~~current~~Reorganization ormay ~~potential~~not ~~litigation~~become ~~regarding whether certain holders are entitled to make-whole or redemption premiums and/or post-petition interest in connection with the treatment of their claims in bankruptcy, and~~effective.

•While the Plan of Reorganization has been confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court, it may not become effective because it is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions precedent (some of which are beyond EFIH's control). There can be no assurance that such conditions will be satisfied, and therefore, that the Plan of Reorganization will become effective and that the Debtors will emerge from the Chapter 11 Cases as contemplated by such Plan of Reorganization. If the transactions contemplated by the Plan of Reorganization are not completed, it may become necessary to amend the Plan of Reorganization. The ~~outcome~~terms of ~~current~~any such amendment are uncertain and could result in material additional expense and result in material delays in the Chapter 11 Cases. EFIH no longer has the exclusive right to propose a plan of reorganization in the Chapter 11 Cases. Accordingly, any creditor of the Debtors could propose a plan of reorganization with respect to any one or ~~potential~~more ~~claims~~of ~~regarding~~the ~~intercompany~~Debtors. Any ~~claims~~new plan of reorganization would require the approval of the Bankruptcy Court and/ the approval of the required creditors, which could subject EFIH to more lengthy and costly Chapter 11 Cases. In addition, any resulting delay could require EFIH to extend or ~~derivative~~refinance ~~claims~~its DIP Facility and could adversely impact its liquidity.

EFIH is also subject to risks and uncertainties with respect to the actions and decisions of creditors and other third parties who have interests in the Chapter 11 Cases that may be inconsistent with its plans. In addition, the Chapter 11 Cases subject EFIH to risks related to litigation and/or claims asserted by creditors or other stakeholders in the Chapter 11 Cases. These risks and uncertainties could affect EFIH in various ways and may significantly increase the duration of the Chapter 11 Cases. Because of the risks and uncertainties associated with Chapter 11 Cases, EFIH cannot predict or quantify the ultimate impact that events occurring during the Chapter 11 Cases may have on its cash flows, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations nor can EFIH predict the ultimate impact that events occurring during the Chapter 11 Cases may have on its or its affiliates' (excluding the Oncor Ring Fenced Entities) corporate structure. For example, in connection with the Chapter 11 Cases, certain of EFIH's or EFIH's affiliates' creditors may seek, and receive, Bankruptcy Court approval to sell or otherwise transfer certain of their respective assets in order to satisfy liabilities owed to such creditors. Any such transfer could result in significant tax liabilities for EFH Corp. and its subsidiaries (excluding the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities), which could reduce the recovery of creditors.

The duration of the Chapter 11 Cases is difficult to estimate and could be lengthy. Due to the termination of the Restructuring Support and Lock-Up Agreement (RSA), the Debtors (including the EFIH Debtors) are likely subject to more lengthy, costly and contentious Chapter 11 Cases. If the Debtors (including the EFIH Debtors) are unable to file and solicit votes for a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization prior to the expiration of the exclusivity period granted by the Bankruptcy Court, then third parties can file a plan, which would likely further exacerbate the length, cost and contentiousness of the Chapter 11 Cases. Moreover, the duration of the Chapter 11 Cases is subject to the receipt of Bankruptcy Court approval for a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization and regulatory approvals, the timing of which is unpredictable.

The duration of the Chapter 11 Cases is difficult to estimate and could be lengthy. As a result of the termination of the RSA, the Debtors (including the EFIH Debtors) are likely subject to more lengthy, costly and contentious Chapter 11 Cases, which will likely have a more pronounced adverse effect on its business than the pre-arranged plan contemplated by the RSA. The Chapter 11 Cases will likely involve contested issues with multiple stakeholders.

IfThe ~~the~~consummation ~~Debtors~~of ~~(including~~ the ~~EFIH~~EFH ~~Debtors)~~Acquisition ~~are~~contemplated ~~unable~~by tothe ~~file~~Plan ~~a Chapter 11 plan~~ of ~~reorganization,~~Reorganization oris ~~solicit~~subject ~~the appropriate votes for such plan, in each case, prior~~ to ~~the~~various ~~expiration~~conditions ofprecedent. If the ~~exclusivity~~Merger ~~period~~and ~~granted~~Purchase byAgreement ~~the~~is ~~Bankruptcy Court (currently June 23~~terminated, ~~2015~~the ~~for~~Purchasers ~~filing a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization~~ and ~~August 23, 2015 for soliciting~~ the ~~appropriate~~Investor ~~votes~~Group ~~for~~will ~~such~~effectively ~~plan),~~have ~~third~~no ~~parties~~liability ~~could~~to ~~file~~the ~~their~~Debtors ~~own~~thereunder ~~plan~~except orfor ~~plans~~certain ofexpense ~~reorganization~~reimbursement obligations. ~~Any~~As ~~such~~a ~~third~~result, ~~party~~there ~~plan~~is orno ~~plans~~certainty ~~will~~that ~~likely exacerbate~~ the ~~length,~~EFH ~~cost~~Acquisition ~~and~~will ~~contentiousness~~be ~~of the Chapter 11 Cases~~completed.

The Merger and Purchase Agreement includes various conditions precedent to consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby. The Purchasers' conditions precedent include, among other things, a condition that certain approvals and rulings be obtained, including from, among others, the PUCT and the IRS, that are necessary to consummate the acquisition and convert a successor to Reorganized EFH into a REIT. In addition, the Merger and Purchase Agreement may be terminated upon certain events, including, among other things, by either party, if certain termination events occur under the Plan Support Agreement, including if the EFH Acquisition is not completed by April 30, 2016, subject to extension to June 30, 2016 or August 31, 2016 under certain conditions. If the Merger and Purchase Agreement is terminated for any reason (including, among other things, due to failure to complete the EFH Acquisition within the timeframes described therein), the Purchasers and the Investor Group will effectively have no liability to the Debtors thereunder. EFH Corp. and EFIH have effectively waived their respective rights under the Merger and Purchase Agreement to seek any legal or equitable remedies (including money damages and specific performance) against the Purchasers or the Investor Group. As a result, even if the applicable regulatory approvals are obtained, there is no certainty that the EFH Acquisition will be completed. If it is not completed for any reason, the Debtors will have no recourse against the Purchasers and the Investor Group except for certain expense reimbursement obligations.

Operating under Chapter 11 may restrict EFIH's ability to pursue its strategic initiatives. Moreover, EFIH is subject to various covenants and events of default under its DIP Facility.

~~The~~Under ~~EFIH~~Chapter ~~Debtors~~11, ~~are~~transactions ~~subject~~outside tothe ~~various~~ordinary ~~covenants~~course ~~and events~~ of ~~default~~business ~~under~~are ~~its~~subject ~~DIP~~to ~~Facility. In~~the ~~general,~~prior ~~certain~~approval of ~~these~~the ~~covenants~~Bankruptcy ~~limit~~Court, ~~the~~which ~~Debtors~~may limit EFIH's ability, ~~subject~~to respond in a timely manner to certain ~~exceptions,~~events toor take ~~certain~~advantage ~~actions~~of ~~such~~certain asopportunities ~~selling~~or ~~assets,~~to ~~granting~~adapt ~~liens,~~to ~~incurring~~changing ~~indebtedness~~market ~~and~~or ~~making~~industry ~~investments~~conditions. IfThe ~~the~~ EFIH Debtors ~~fail~~are subject to ~~comply~~various ~~with these~~ covenants orand anevents ~~event~~ of default ~~occurs~~ under ~~the~~its DIP Facility. In general, ~~its~~certain ~~liquidity~~of these covenants limit the Debtors' ability, ~~financial~~subject ~~condition~~to orcertain ~~operations~~exceptions, ~~may~~to betake ~~materially~~certain ~~impacted.~~actions, including:


•	selling assets outside the normal course of business;


•	consolidating, merging, selling or otherwise disposing of all or substantially all of its assets;


•	granting liens, and


•	financing its investments or other capital needs or engaging in other business activities that may be in its best interest.

If the EFIH Debtors fail to comply with these covenants or an event of default occurs under the DIP Facility, EFIH's liquidity, financial condition or operations may be materially impacted.

As a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, EFIH's historical financial information may not be indicative of its future financial performance.

~~EFIH's~~On ~~capital~~the ~~structure~~effective ~~will~~date ~~likely~~of bethe ~~significantly~~Plan ~~altered~~of ~~under~~Reorganization, ~~any~~EFIH's ~~Chapter~~capital 11structure ~~plan~~will ~~confirmed~~be bysignificantly ~~the Bankruptcy Court~~altered. Under fresh-start accounting rules that ~~may~~will apply to EFIH upon the effective date of athe ~~Chapter~~Plan 11or ~~plan~~Reorganization, EFIH's assets and liabilities ~~would~~will be adjusted to fair value, which could have a significant impact on EFIH's financial statements. Accordingly, ~~if fresh-start accounting rules apply,~~ EFIH's financial condition and results of operations following its emergence from Chapter 11 ~~would~~will not be comparable to the financial condition and results of operations reflected in its historical financial statements. In connection with the Chapter 11 Cases ~~and the development of a Chapter 11 plan~~, it is also possible that additional restructuring and related charges may be identified and recorded in future periods. Such charges could be material to EFIH's consolidated financial position, liquidity and results of operations.

There is no assurance regarding the outcome of ~~any~~various ~~litigation~~appeals ~~regarding~~related to whether note holders are entitled to certain make-whole or redemption premiums and/or post-petition interest in connection with the treatment of their claims in bankruptcy.

The EFIH Debtors are engaged in litigation regarding whether holders of its outstanding notes are entitled to receive a make-whole or redemption premium in connection with the repayment of such notes, including pursuant to a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization. As of December 31, ~~2014~~2015, the total aggregate amount of make-whole or redemption premiums that would be owed if such alleged claims were allowed claims would be approximately $~~1.123~~946 ~~billion~~million (of which $432 million relates to the EFIH First Lien Notes, $~~591~~401 million relates to the EFIH Second Lien Notes and $~~100~~113 million relates to the EFIH PIK Notes). InThe ~~these~~EFIH ~~matters,~~Debtors have received orders from the ~~EFIH~~Bankruptcy ~~Debtors~~Court ~~have~~disallowing ~~requested~~such claims, orbut ~~expect~~these toorders ~~request~~are subject to, ~~orders~~and ~~from~~are in the ~~Bankruptcy~~process ~~Court~~of, ~~disallowing~~being ~~such~~appealed ~~make-whole~~by orholders ~~redemption~~of such claims. See Note 10 to the Financial Statements for a more detailed discussion regarding these claims.

Moreover, creditors may make additional claims in the Chapter 11 Cases in connection with a repayment or settlement of their pre-petition debt such as indemnification claims or for the payment of fees and expenses incurred in connection with litigating such claims.

In addition, creditors may assert claims for post-petition interest, including default interest, on their outstanding notes in connection with the repayment of such notes, including pursuant to a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization. Such amounts would be material, particularly if such post-petition interest were required to be paid at the contract rate as opposed to the federal judgment rate.

EFIH cannot predict whether any such litigations would be filed or, if filed, the outcome of any such litigation or the Bankruptcy Court's determination regarding the validity or the amounts payable in respect of any such claim.

The EFIH DIP Facilities may be insufficient to fund EFIH's cash requirements through its emergence from bankruptcy. In addition, EFIH's independent auditor's report on its financial statements raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern given the Chapter 11 Cases.

For the duration of the Chapter 11 Cases, EFIH will be subject to various risks, including but not limited to (i) the inability to maintain or obtain sufficient financing sources for operations or to fund any reorganization plan and meet future obligations, and (ii) increased legal and other professional costs associated with the Chapter 11 Cases and its reorganization.

~~EFIH believes that the EFIH DIP Facilities~~Moreover, ~~plus~~creditors ~~cash~~have ~~distributions~~made ~~received~~and ~~from~~may ~~Oncor~~continue ~~Holdings, will be sufficient~~ to ~~fund~~make ~~EFIH's~~additional ~~anticipated~~claims ~~cash~~in ~~requirements through~~ the ~~pendency of the~~ Chapter 11 Cases~~. However,~~ ifin connection with a ~~Chapter~~repayment 11or ~~plan~~settlement of ~~reorganization~~their ispre-petition ~~not~~debt ~~completed~~such ~~during~~as ~~the~~indemnification ~~term~~claims ofor for the ~~EFIH~~payment ~~DIP~~of ~~Facilities,~~fees ~~EFIH~~and ~~may~~expenses ~~not~~incurred bein ~~able~~connection towith ~~obtain~~litigating ~~sufficient~~such ~~additional financing on acceptable terms or at all~~claims.

In addition, creditors have asserted and may continue to assert claims for post-petition interest, including default interest, on their outstanding notes in connection with the repayment of such notes, including pursuant to a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization. Such amounts would be material, particularly if such post-petition interest were required to be paid at the contract rate as opposed to the federal judgment rate.

EFIH cannot predict the ultimate outcome of any of these matters.

The DIP Facility may be insufficient to fund EFIH's cash requirements through its emergence from bankruptcy. In addition, EFIH's independent auditor's report on its financial statements raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern given the Chapter 11 Cases.

For the duration of the Chapter 11 Cases, EFIH will be subject to various risks, including but not limited to (i) the inability to maintain or obtain sufficient financing sources for operations or to fund the Plan of Reorganization and meet future obligations, and (ii) increased legal and other professional costs associated with the Chapter 11 Cases and its reorganization.

If the transactions contemplated by the Plan of Reorganization are not completed and the effective date of the Plan of Reorganization does not occur prior to the maturity of the DIP Facility, EFIH will likely need to refinance its existing DIP Facility. EFIH may not be able to obtain some or all of any such financing on acceptable terms or at all.

In its report on EFIH's financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, EFIH's independent public accounting firm states that the uncertainties inherent in the bankruptcy process raise substantial doubt about EFIH's ability to continue as a going concern.

EFIH may not be able to obtain exit financing to repay the ~~EFIH~~ DIP ~~Facilities~~Facility or, if EFIH is able to obtain such exit financing, the agreements governing such exit financing may significantly restrict its financing and ~~operations~~operational flexibility after emerging from bankruptcy.

It is expected that the ~~EFIH First Lien~~ DIP Facility will be repaid using, in whole or in part, the proceeds from borrowings under exit financings. EFIH's ability to obtain such exit financings will depend on, among other things, the timing and outcome of various ongoing matters in the Chapter 11 Cases, its business, operations and financial condition, and market conditions. EFIH has not yet received any commitment with respect to any exit facilities, and there can be no assurance that it will be able to obtain such exit facilities on reasonable economic terms, or at all. If EFIH cannot secure exit financing, it may not be able to emerge from bankruptcy and may not be able to repay the ~~EFIH First Lien~~ DIP Facility at its respective ~~maturity~~maturities. Any exit financing that EFIH is able to secure may include a number of significant restrictive covenants which could impair its financing and operational flexibility and make it difficult for EFIH to react to market conditions and satisfy its ongoing capital needs an unanticipated cash requirements. In addition, such exit facilities may require us to periodically meet various financial ratios and tests. The financial covenants and tests could limit EFIH's ability to react to market conditions or satisfy extraordinary capital needs and could otherwise restrict its financing and operations.

As a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, net operating losses and other tax attributes are not expected to be available upon emergence from the Chapter 11 Cases.

Certain tax attributes, such as net operating loss carry-forwards and certain tax credits, are expected to be utilized in connection with the Chapter 11 Cases. Under the Internal Revenue Code, tax attributes are reduced to the extent discharge of indebtedness income is excluded from gross income arising from a Chapter 11 case. If any attributes are still available after the application of ~~this~~Section ~~provision~~108, such attributes may be limited or lost in the event EFH Corp. or any of its subsidiaries, ~~including EFIH,~~ experience an ownership change as defined under the Internal Revenue Code. In addition, tax attributes may be utilized in a transaction such as a sale or transfer of assets that could result in a significant tax liability for EFH Corp. and its subsidiaries~~, including EFIH~~. As a result of the foregoing rules, any pre-emergence net operating losses and certain tax credits are not expected to be available to EFH Corp. and its subsidiaries, ~~including EFIH,~~ to reduce taxable income for tax periods beginning after emergence from Chapter 11.

While the Bankruptcy Court approved the Debtors' bidding procedures for the solicitation of bids from third parties to purchase EFH Corp.'s indirect economic ownership interest in Oncor, there can be no assurance that the Debtors will receive a bid the Debtors deem acceptable, that the Bankruptcy Court will approve any such bid or that any such transaction will ultimately close.

In January 2015, the Bankruptcy Court approved the Debtors' bidding procedures motion that sets forth the process by which the Debtors are authorized to solicit proposals (i.e., bids) from third parties to acquire (in any form and employing any structure, whether taxable (in whole or in part) or tax-free) EFH Corp.'s indirect economic ownership in Oncor in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code. EFIH cannot predict the outcome of this process, including whether any acceptable bid will be received, whether the Bankruptcy Court will approve any such bid or whether any such transaction will (or when it will) ultimately close because any such transaction would be the subject of customary closing conditions, including receipt of all applicable regulatory approvals.

Risks Related to EFIH's Structure

EFIH is a holding company and its obligations are structurally subordinated to existing and future liabilities and preferred stock of its subsidiaries.

EFIH's cash flows and ability to meet its obligations are largely dependent upon the earnings of the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities, and the payment of such earnings to EFIH in the form of dividends or distributions. The Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities are separate and distinct legal entities from EFIH and have no obligation (other than any existing contractual obligations, which may be suspended or altered in the Chapter 11 Cases) to provide EFIH with funds for its payment obligations. Any decision by a subsidiary to provide EFIH with funds for its payment obligations, whether by dividends or distributions, will depend on, among other things, the subsidiary's results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. In addition, a subsidiary's ability to pay dividends may be limited by covenants in its existing and future debt agreements, applicable law and the Chapter 11 Cases. Further, the distributions that may be paid by Oncor are limited as discussed below.

Because EFIH is a holding company, its obligations to its creditors are structurally subordinated to all existing and future liabilities and existing and future preferred stock of its subsidiaries that do not guarantee such obligations. Therefore, EFIH's rights and the rights of its creditors to participate in the assets of any subsidiary in the event that such a subsidiary is liquidated or reorganized are subject to the prior claims of such subsidiary's creditors and holders of such subsidiary's preferred stock. To the extent that EFIH may be a creditor with recognized claims against any such subsidiary, EFIH's claims would still be subject to the prior claims of such subsidiary's creditors to the extent that they are secured or senior to those held by EFIH. Subject to restrictions contained in EFIH's financing arrangements and limitations imposed by the EFIH's subsidiaries may incur additional debt and other liabilities.

EFIH has a very limited ability to control activities at Oncor due to structural and operational ring-fencing measures.

EFIH depends upon Oncor for a significant amount of its cash flows and relies on such cash flows in order to satisfy its obligations. However, EFIH has a very limited ability to control the activities of Oncor. As part of the ring-fencing measures implemented by EFH Corp. and Oncor, including certain measures required by the PUCT's Order on Rehearing in Docket No. 34077, a majority of the members of Oncor's board of directors are required to meet the New York Stock Exchange requirements for independence in all material respects, and the unanimous, or majority, consent of such directors is required for Oncor to take certain actions. In addition, any new independent directors are required to be appointed by the nominating committee of Oncor Holdings' board of directors, a majority of whose members are independent directors. No member of EFIH's or EFH Corp.'s management is a member of Oncor's board of directors. Under Oncor Holdings' and Oncor's organizational documents, EFH Corp. has limited indirect consent rights with respect to the activities of Oncor, including (i) new issuances of equity securities by Oncor, (ii) material transactions with third parties involving Oncor outside of the ordinary course of business, (iii) actions that cause Oncor's assets to be subject to an increased level of jurisdiction of the FERC, (iv) any changes to the state of formation of Oncor, (v) material changes to accounting methods not required by US GAAP and (vi) actions that fail to enforce certain tax sharing obligations between Oncor and EFH Corp. In addition, Oncor's organizational agreements contain restrictions on Oncor's ability to make distributions to its members, including indirectly to EFIH.

~~Additionally,~~The ~~the~~ restrictive measures required by the PUCT's Order on Rehearing in Docket No. 34077, include, among other things:


•	Oncor not being restricted from incurring its own debt;


•	Oncor not guaranteeing or pledging any of its assets to secure the debt of any member of the Texas Holdings Group; and


•	restrictions on distributions by Oncor, and the right of the independent members of Oncor's board of directors and the largest non-majority member of Oncor to block the payment of distributions to Oncor Holdings (i.e., such distributions not being available to EFIH under certain circumstances).

Oncor may or may not make any distributions to EFIH.

EFH Corp. and Oncor have implemented certain structural and operational ring-fencing measures, including certain measures required by the PUCT's Order on Rehearing in Docket No. 34077, that were based on principles articulated by rating agencies and commitments made by Texas Holdings and Oncor to the PUCT and the FERC to further enhance Oncor's credit quality. These measures were put in place to mitigate Oncor's credit exposure to the Texas Holdings Group and to reduce the risk that the assets and liabilities of Oncor would be substantively consolidated with the assets and liabilities of the Texas Holdings Group in a bankruptcy of one or more of those entities.

As part of the ring-fencing measures, a majority of the members of the board of directors of Oncor are required to be, and are, independent from EFH Corp. and EFIH. Any new independent directors of Oncor are required to be appointed by the nominating committee of Oncor Holdings, which is required to be, and is, comprised of a majority of directors that are independent from EFH Corp. and EFIH. The organizational documents of Oncor give its independent directors, acting by majority vote, and, during certain periods, any director designated by Texas Transmission, the express right to prevent distributions from Oncor if they determine that it is in the best interests of Oncor to retain such amounts to meet expected future requirements. The Chapter 11 Cases could result in Oncor limiting or suspending such dividends to EFIH during the pendency of such filing. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that Oncor will make any distributions to EFIH.

In addition, Oncor's organizational documents prohibit Oncor from making any distribution to its owners, including EFIH, so long as and to the extent that such distribution would cause Oncor's regulatory capital structure to exceed the debt-to-equity ratio established ~~from time to time~~ by the PUCT for ratemaking purposes, which is currently set at 60% debt to 40% equity. Under the terms of a Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement, Oncor makes tax payments to EFH Corp. (bypassing EFIH) based on its share of an amount calculated to approximate the amount of taxes Oncor would have paid to the IRS if it were a stand-alone taxpayer.

Moreover, Oncor has incurred debt in connection with CREZ and may incur additional debt in connection with other investments in infrastructure or technology. Accordingly, while Oncor is required to maintain a specified debt-to-equity ratio, there can be no assurance that Oncor's equity balance will be sufficient to maintain the required debt-to-equity ratio established from time to time by the PUCT for ratemaking purposes, thereby restricting Oncor from making any distributions to EFIH.9

Oncor's ring-fencing measures may not work as planned and the Bankruptcy Court may nevertheless subject Oncor to the claims of Texas Holdings Group entity creditors.

In 2007, EFH Corp. and Oncor implemented certain structural and operational ring-fencing measures, including certain measures required by the PUCT's Order on Rehearing in Docket No. 34077, that were based on principles articulated by rating agencies and commitments made by Texas Holdings and Oncor to the PUCT and the FERC to further enhance Oncor's credit quality. These measures were put in place to mitigate Oncor's credit exposure to the Texas Holdings Group and to minimize the risk that a court would order any of Oncor Holdings', Oncor's or Oncor's subsidiary's (collectively, the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities) assets and liabilities to be substantively consolidated with those of any member of the Texas Holdings Group in the event that a member of the Texas Holdings Group were to become a debtor in a bankruptcy case. Substantive consolidation is an equitable remedy in bankruptcy that results in the pooling of the assets and liabilities of the debtor and one or more of its affiliates solely for purposes of the bankruptcy case, including for purposes of distributions to creditors and voting on and treatment under a reorganization plan. Bankruptcy courts have broad equitable powers, and as a result, outcomes in bankruptcy proceedings are inherently difficult to predict. To the extent the Bankruptcy Court were to determine that substantive consolidation was appropriate under the facts and circumstances, then the assets and liabilities of any Oncor Ring-Fenced Entity that were subject to the substantive consolidation order would be available to help satisfy the debt or contractual obligations of the Texas Holdings Group entity that was a debtor in bankruptcy and subject to the same substantive consolidation order. However, even if any Oncor Ring-Fenced Entity were included in such a substantive consolidation order, the secured creditors of Oncor would retain their liens and priority with respect to Oncor's assets.

There can be no assurance that the Bankruptcy Court will not order an Oncor Ring-Fenced Entity's assets and liabilities to be substantively consolidated with those of the Debtors or that the Chapter 11 Cases will not result in a disruption of services Oncor receives from, or jointly with, EFIH's affiliates. See Note 1 to the Financial Statements for additional information on ring-fencing measures.

In addition, Oncor's access to capital markets and cost of debt could be directly affected by its credit ratings. Any adverse action with respect to Oncor's credit ratings would generally cause borrowing costs to increase and the potential pool of investors and funding sources to decrease. Oncor's credit ratings are currently substantially higher than those of the Texas Holdings Group. If credit rating agencies were to change their views of Oncor's independence from any member of the Texas Holdings Group, Oncor's credit ratings would likely decline. Despite the ring-fencing measures, rating agencies have in the past, and could in the future, take an adverse action with respect to Oncor's credit ratings in response to debt restructuring or other activities by EFH Corp. or any of its subsidiaries, including the Chapter 11 Cases In the event any such adverse action takes place and causes Oncor's borrowing costs to increase, it may not be able to recover these increased costs if they exceed Oncor's PUCT-approved cost of debt determined in its most recent rate case or subsequent rate cases.

Risks Related to EFIH's Investment in Oncor

EFIH is a holding company conducting its operations principally through its subsidiary, Oncor (in which it indirectly holds an approximate 80% ownership interest). As such, the risks described below relating to Oncor's business will apply to EFIH. Given the ring-fencing measures that have been implemented by EFH Corp. and Oncor described in Note 1 to the Financial Statements, EFIH will have limited ability to mitigate any of the risks described below.

Oncor's business is subject to ongoing complex governmental regulations and legislation that have impacted, and ~~will~~may ~~continue~~ in the future to impact, its business and/or results of operations.

Oncor's business operates in a changing market environment influenced by various state and federal legislative and regulatory initiatives regarding the ~~electricity~~energy industry. Oncor will need to continually adapt to these changes.

Oncor's business is subject to changes in state and federal laws (including PURA, the Federal Power Act, the Public Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978 and the Energy Policy Act of 2005), changing governmental policy and regulatory actions (including a review of a change in control of Oncor in connection with resolution of the EFH Bankruptcy Proceedings~~(including~~ ~~those~~by of the PUCT, and also including generally by the NERC, the TRE, the TCEQ, the FERC and the EPA) and the rules, guidelines and protocols of ERCOT with respect to matters including, but not limited to, market structure and design, construction and operation of transmission and distribution facilities, acquisition, disposal, depreciation and amortization of regulated assets and facilities, recovery of costs and investments, return on invested capital and environmental matters. Changes in, revisions to, or reinterpretations of existing laws and regulations and other regulatory actions may have a material effect on Oncor's business and it could be exposed to increased costs to comply with the more stringent requirements or new interpretations and to potential liability for customer refunds, penalties or other amounts. If it is determined that Oncor did not comply with applicable statutes, regulations, rules, tariffs or orders and it is ordered to pay a material amount in customer refunds, penalties or other amounts, its financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows would be materially affected.

The Texas Legislature meets every two years. The current regular legislative session began in January 2015; however, at any time the governor of Texas may convene a special session of the legislature. During any regular or special session, bills may be introduced that, if adopted, could materially affect Oncor's business and its business prospects.

The rates of Oncor's electricity delivery business are subject to regulatory review, and may be reduced below current levels, which could adversely impact Oncor's financial condition and results of operations.

The rates charged by Oncor are regulated by the PUCT and certain cities and are subject to cost-of-service regulation and annual earnings oversight. This regulatory treatment does not provide any assurance as to achievement of earnings levels. Oncor's rates are regulated based on an analysis of Oncor's costs and capital structure, as reviewed and approved in a regulatory proceeding. While rate regulation is premised on the full recovery of prudently incurred costs and a reasonable rate of return on invested capital, there can be no assurance that the PUCT will judge all of Oncor's costs to have been prudently incurred, that the PUCT will not reduce the amount of invested capital included in the capital structure that Oncor's rates are based upon, or that the regulatory process in which rates are determined will always result in rates that will produce full recovery of Oncor's costs, including regulatory assets reported on Oncor's balance sheet, and the return on invested capital allowed by the PUCT. See Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Significant Activities and Events and Items Influencing Future Performance – Oncor Matters with the PUCT for discussion of recent and pending rate-related filings with the PUCT.

Oncor's Operational Risks

Attacks on Oncor's infrastructure or other events that disrupt or breach its cyber/data or physical security measures could have an adverse impact on its reputation, disrupt business operations and expose it to significant liabilities including penalties for failure to comply with federal, state or local statutes and regulations, which could have a material effect on Oncor's results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

A breach of cyber/data security measures that impairs Oncor's information technology infrastructure could disrupt normal business operations and affect its ability to control its transmission and distribution assets, access customer information and limit communication with third parties. ~~Recently there have been numerous attacks on government and industry information technology systems that have resulted in material operational, reputation and/or financial costs.~~ While Oncor has controls in place designed to protect its information technology infrastructure and has not had any significant breaches to date, any loss of confidential or proprietary data through a breach could adversely affect Oncor's reputation, expose it to material legal and regulatory claims, impair its ability to execute on business strategies and/or materially affect its results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

1110

A physical attack on Oncor's transmission and distribution infrastructure could also interfere with normal business operations and affect its ability to control its transmission and distribution assets. While Oncor has security measures in place designed to protect its transmission and distribution system and has not had any significant security breaches, a physical security breach could adversely affect its reputation, expose Oncor to material regulatory claims and/or materially affect its results of operations, liquidity and financial condition.

~~The FERC has established standards for assets identified as "critical cyber assets."~~ Under the Energy Policy Act of 2005, the FERC can impose penalties (up to $1 million per day per violation) for failure to comply with mandatory electric reliability standards, including standards to protect the power system against potential disruptions from cyber and physical security breaches.

Oncor participates in industry groups and discussions with regulators to remain current on emerging threats and mitigating techniques. These groups include, but are not limited to: the US Cyber Emergency Response Team, the National Electric Sector Cyber Security Organization, the Department of Homeland Security, the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission and NERC. Oncor also applies the knowledge gained by continuing to invest in technology, processes, security measures and services to detect, mitigate and protect its assets, both physical and cyber. These investments include upgrades to network architecture and physical security measures, regular intrusion detection monitoring and compliance with emerging industry regulation.

Oncor's capital deployment program may not be executed as planned, which could adversely impact Oncor's financial condition and results of operations.

There can be no guarantee that the execution of Oncor's capital deployment program for its electricity delivery facilities will be successful, and there can be no assurance that the capital investments Oncor intends to make in connection with its electricity delivery business will produce the desired reductions in cost and improvements to service and reliability. Furthermore, there can be no guarantee that Oncor's capital investments will ultimately be recoverable through rates or, if recovered, that they will be recovered on a timely basis. For more information regarding the limitation on recovering the value of investments using rates, see Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Significant Activities and Events and Items Influencing Future Performance – Oncor Matters with the PUCT and – Key Risks and Challenges.

Market volatility may impact Oncor's business and financial condition in ways that Oncor currently cannot predict.

Because its operations are capital intensive, Oncor expects to rely over the long-term upon access to financial markets as a significant source of liquidity for capital requirements not satisfied by cash-on-hand, operating cash flows or its revolving credit facility. Considering Oncor's construction plans to service its growing customer base and ERCOT needs, it is likely Oncor will incur additional debt. In addition, Oncor may incur additional debt in connection with other investments in infrastructure or technology, such as smart grid systems. Oncor's ability to access the capital or credit markets may be severely restricted at a time when Oncor would like, or need, to access those markets, which could have an impact on Oncor's flexibility to react to changing economic and business conditions. In addition, the cost of debt financing may be materially and adversely impacted by these market conditions. Even if Oncor is able to obtain debt financing, it may be unable to recover in rates some or all of the costs of such debt financing if they exceed its PUCT-approved cost of debt determined in Oncor's most recent rate review or subsequent rate reviews. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that the capital and credit markets will continue to be a reliable or acceptable source of short-term or long-term financing for Oncor. Additionally, disruptions in the capital and credit markets could have a broader impact on the economy in ways that could lead to reduced electricity usage, which could have a negative impact on Oncor's revenues, or have an impact on Oncor's customers, counterparties and/or lenders, causing them to fail to meet their obligations to Oncor.

Adverse actions with respect to Oncor's credit ratings could negatively affect Oncor's ability to access capital.

Oncor's access to capital markets and its cost of debt could be directly affected by its credit ratings. Any adverse action with respect to Oncor's credit ratings could generally cause borrowing costs to increase and the potential pool of investors and funding sources to decrease. Oncor's credit ratings are currently substantially higher than those of EFH Corp. and EFIH. If credit rating agencies were to change their views on Oncor's independence from EFH Corp., Oncor's credit ratings would likely decline. Despite the ring-fencing measures, rating agencies have in the past taken, and could in the future take, an adverse action with respect to Oncor's credit ratings in response to financing and liability management activities by, or restructuring transactions involving EFH Corp. and other members of the Texas Holdings Group. Further, it is unclear how the progress of the Chapter 11 Cases and the consummation of the EFH ~~Bankruptcy~~Acquisition ~~Proceedings~~and change in ownership of Oncor proposed in such proceedings may affect Oncor's credit ratings. In the event any action in connection with the EFH Bankruptcy Proceedings causes Oncor's borrowing costs to increase, Oncor may not be able to recover such increased costs if they exceed the PUCT-approved cost of debt determined in its most recent rate review or subsequent rate reviews.

1211

Most of Oncor's large suppliers and counterparties require an expected level of creditworthiness in order for them to enter into transactions with Oncor. If its credit ratings decline, the costs to operate Oncor's business could increase because counterparties could require the posting of collateral in the form of cash-related instruments, or counterparties could decline to do business with Oncor.

Oncor is subject to mandatory reliability standards and periodic audits of its compliance with those standards. Efforts to comply with those standards could subject Oncor to higher operating costs and/or increased capital expenditures, and non-compliance with applicable standards could subject Oncor to penalties that could have a material effect on its business.

The FERC has approved the delegation by NERC of compliance and enforcement authority for reliability in the ERCOT region to the TRE. To maintain compliance with the mandatory reliability standards, Oncor may be subjected to higher operating costs and/or increased capital expenditures. While Oncor expects to recover costs and expenditures from customers through regulated rates, there can be no assurance that the PUCT will approve full recovery of such costs or the timing of any such recovery. In addition, if Oncor were to be found in noncompliance with applicable reliability standards, it could be subject to sanctions, including monetary penalties. Under the Energy Policy Act of 2005, FERC can impose penalties (up to $1 million per day per violation) for failure to comply with reliability standards, which would not be recoverable from customers through regulated rates. Oncor has ~~five~~four registrations with NERC – as a transmission planner, a transmission owner, a transmission operator, ~~a distribution provider~~ and a ~~load~~distribution ~~serving entity~~provider. As a registered entity, Oncor is subject to periodic audits by the TRE of its compliance with reliability standards. These audits will occur as designated by the TRE at a minimum of every three years. Oncor cannot predict the outcome of any such audits.

Oncor's revenues are concentrated in a small number of customers, including TCEH, and any delay or default in payment could adversely affect its cash flows, financial condition and results of operations.

Oncor's revenues from the distribution of electricity are collected from approximately 80 REPs (including TXU Energy, a subsidiary of TCEH) and certain electric cooperatives in Oncor's certificated service area, that sell the electricity Oncor distributes to consumers. Revenues from services provided to TCEH represented 25% of Oncor's total reported consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015. Revenues from services provided to REP subsidiaries of a non-affiliated entity collectively represented 1617% of Oncor's total reported consolidated revenues for the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015. Adverse economic conditions, structural problems in the market served by ERCOT, the EFH Bankruptcy Proceedings involving TCEH or the financial difficulties of other REPs could impair the ability of these REPs to pay for Oncor's services or could cause them to delay such payments. Oncor depends on these REPs to timely remit these revenues. Oncor could experience delays or defaults in payment from these REPs, which could adversely affect Oncor's cash flows, financial condition and results of operations. Due to commitments made to the PUCT in connection with the Merger, Oncor will not be allowed to recover bad debt expense, or certain other costs and expenses, from rate payers in the event of a default or bankruptcy by an affiliate REP.

In the future, Oncor could have liquidity needs that could be difficult to satisfy under some circumstances, especially in uncertain financial market conditions.

Oncor's operations are capital intensive. Oncor relies on access to financial markets and its revolving credit facility as a significant source of liquidity for capital requirements, including maturities of long-term debt, not satisfied by cash-on-hand or operating cash flows. The inability to raise capital on favorable terms or access liquidity facilities, particularly during times of uncertainty ~~similar to those experienced in the financial markets in 2008 and 2009~~, could adversely impact Oncor's ability to sustain and grow its business and would likely increase capital costs that may not be recoverable through rates. Oncor's access to the financial markets and its revolving credit facility, and the pricing and terms Oncor receives in the financial markets, could be adversely impacted by various factors, such as:


•	changes in financial markets that reduce available credit or the ability to obtain or renew liquidity facilities on acceptable terms;


•	economic weakness in the ERCOT market;


•	changes in interest rates;

• a deterioration of Oncor's credit worthiness or a reduction in its credit ratings;


•	a deterioration of the credit or insolvency or financial distress of one or more lenders under Oncor's revolving credit facility that affects the ability of the lender(s) to make loans to Oncor;

• a deterioration of the credit or bankruptcy of EFH Corp. or EFH Corp.'s other subsidiaries or a reduction in the credit ratings of EFH Corp. or EFH Corp.'s other subsidiaries that is perceived to potentially have an adverse impact on Oncor despite the ring-fencing of the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities from the Texas Holdings Group;12


•	any impacts on Oncor as a result of the Chapter 11 Cases and the consummation of the EFH Acquisition and change in indirect ownership of Oncor proposed in such proceedings, including impacts that may lead to a deterioration of Oncor's credit or a reduction in Oncor's credit ratings;


•	a deterioration of the credit of EFH Corp. or EFH Corp.'s other subsidiaries or a reduction in the credit ratings of EFH Corp. or EFH Corp.'s other subsidiaries that is perceived to potentially have an adverse impact on Oncor despite the ring-fencing of the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities from the Texas Holdings Group;


•	a material breakdown in Oncor's risk management procedures; and


•	the occurrence of changes that restrict Oncor's ability to access its revolving credit facility.

Oncor's primary source of liquidity aside from operating cash flows is its ability to borrow under its revolving credit facility. The revolving credit facility contains a debt-to-capital ratio covenant that effectively limits Oncor's ability to incur indebtedness in the future. At December 31, ~~2014~~2015, Oncor was in compliance with such covenant. The revolving credit facility and the senior notes and debentures issued by Oncor are secured by the Deed of Trust, which permits Oncor to secure other indebtedness with the lien of the Deed of Trust up to the aggregate of (i) the amount of available bond credits, and (ii) 85% of the lower of the fair value or cost of certain property additions that could be certified to the Deed of Trust collateral agent. At December 31, ~~2014~~2015, the available bond credits were approximately $2.~~208~~577 billion and the amount of future debt Oncor could secure with property additions, subject to those property additions being certified to the Deed of Trust collateral agent, was $1.~~570~~261 billion. In connection with the Merger, Oncor committed to the PUCT that it would maintain a regulatory capital structure at or below the assumed debt-to-equity ratio established periodically by the PUCT for ratemaking purposes, which is currently set at 60% debt to 40% equity. At December 31, ~~2014~~2015, Oncor's regulatory capitalization ratio was 5859.8% debt and 4140.2% equity. Oncor's ability to incur additional long-term debt will be limited by its regulatory capital structure.

The costs of providing pension and other postretirement employee benefits (OPEB) and related funding requirements may have a material adverse effect on Oncor's financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Oncor offers certain pension, health care and life insurance benefits to eligible employees and their eligible dependents upon the retirement of such employees through pension and OPEB plans. Previously, some of these benefits were provided through participation with EFH Corp. and certain other subsidiaries of EFH Corp. in joint plans.

In 2012, Oncor entered into an agreement with EFH Corp. to assume primary responsibility for pension benefits of certain participants for whom EFH Corp. bore primary funding responsibility (a closed group of retired and terminated vested plan participants not related to Oncor's regulated utility business). As the Oncor Retirement Plan received an amount of plan assets equal to the liabilities Oncor assumed for those participants, execution of the agreement did not have a material impact on its reported results of operations or financial condition in 2012. However, there can be no guarantee that such assumption will not have an impact on Oncor's results of operations or financial condition in the future.

In April 2014, Oncor entered into an agreement with EFH Corp. in which Oncor agreed to transfer to the Oncor OPEB Plan effective July 1, 2014, the assets and liabilities related to its eligible current and future retirees as well as retirees of EFH Corp. whose employment included service with both Oncor (or a predecessor regulated electric business) and a nonregulated business of EFH Corp. Pursuant to the agreement, EFH Corp. will retain its portion of the liability for retiree benefits related to those retirees. Since the Oncor OPEB Plan offers identical benefits as the EFH OPEB Plan and Oncor and EFH Corp. retain the same responsibility for participants as before, there was no financial impact as a result of the transfer other than from a remeasurement of the Oncor OPEB Plan’s asset values and obligations. As Oncor is not responsible for EFH Corp.’s portion of the Oncor OPEB Plan’s unfunded liability totaling $101 million as of December 31, 2014, that amount is not reported on its balance sheet.

Oncor's costs or share of the costs of providing pension and OPEB benefits and related funding requirements are dependent upon numerous factors, assumptions and estimates and are subject to changes in these factors, assumptions and estimates, including the market value of the assets funding the pension and OPEB plans. Benefits costs and related funding requirements are also subject to changing employee demographics (including but not limited to age, compensation levels and years of accredited service), the level of contributions made to retiree plans, expected and actual earnings on plan assets and the discount rates used in determining the projected benefit obligation. Changes made to the provisions of the plans may also impact current and future benefit costs. Fluctuations in actual market returns as well as changes in general interest rates may result in increased or decreased benefit costs in future periods.

If EFH Corp. ~~was~~is unable to make contributions to the EFH qualified retirement plan (the plan) assets while it is a member of Oncor's controlled group within the meaning of ERISA, Oncor could be liable under ERISA for such contributions as well as any unfunded plan liability that EFH Corp. is unable to pay. EFH Corp.'s portion of the plan's unfunded pension liability is $3022 million at December 31, ~~2014~~2015. Funding for the plan is expected to total approximately $5212 million in the ~~2015~~2016 to ~~2019~~2020 period, of which Oncor is expected to fund ~~$41 million~~zero.

Oncor's rights under certain agreements with EFH Corp. and other members of the Texas Holdings Group could be adversely affected in connection with the EFH Bankruptcy Proceedings.

Oncor is party to various contracts and unexpired leases with EFH Corp. and other members of the Texas Holdings Group. The US Bankruptcy Code permits a debtor in bankruptcy to assume (accept) or reject contracts and unexpired leases. If members of the Texas Holdings Group, who are debtors in the EFH Bankruptcy Proceedings, were to reject some or all of their contracts and unexpired leases with Oncor in connection with that bankruptcy case, Oncor's results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected, particularly if Oncor is an unsecured creditor with respect to pre-petition amounts owed to Oncor under such contracts.

Oncor's results of operations and financial condition could be negatively impacted by any development or event beyond Oncor's control that causes economic weakness in the ERCOT market.

Oncor derives substantially all of its revenues from operations in the ERCOT market, which covers approximately 75% of the geographical area in the State of Texas. As a result, regardless of the state of the economy in areas outside the ERCOT market, economic weakness in the ERCOT market could lead to reduced demand for electricity in the ERCOT market. Such a reduction could have a material negative impact on Oncor's results of operations and financial condition.

Disruptions at power generation facilities owned by third parties could interrupt Oncor's sales of transmission and distribution services.

The electricity Oncor transmits and distributes to customers of REPs is obtained by the REPs from electricity generation facilities. Oncor does not own or operate any generation facilities. If generation is disrupted or if generation capacity is inadequate, Oncor's sales of transmission and distribution services may be diminished or interrupted, and its results of operations, financial condition and cash flows may be adversely affected.

The operation and maintenance of electricity delivery facilities involves significant risks that could adversely affect Oncor's results of operations and financial condition.

The operation and maintenance of delivery facilities involves many risks, including equipment breakdown or failure of facilities, lack of sufficient capital to maintain the facilities, impact of unusual or adverse weather conditions or other natural events, as well as the risk of performance below expected levels of efficiency or reliability, the occurrence of any of which could result in lost revenues and/or increased expenses that may not be recoverable through rates. A significant number of Oncor's facilities were constructed many years ago. In particular, older transmission and distribution equipment, even if maintained in accordance with good engineering practices, may require significant capital expenditures to keep operating at peak efficiency or reliability. The risk of increased maintenance and capital expenditures arises from damage to facilities due to storms, natural disasters, wars, terrorist acts and other catastrophic events. Further, Oncor's ability to successfully and timely complete capital improvements to existing facilities or other capital projects is contingent upon many variables and subject to substantial risks. Should any such efforts be unsuccessful, Oncor could be subject to additional costs that may not be recoverable through rates and/or the write-off of its investment in the project or improvement.

Insurance, warranties or performance guarantees may not cover all or any of the lost revenues or increased expenses that could result from the risks discussed above. Likewise, Oncor's ability to obtain insurance, and the cost of and coverage provided by such insurance, could be affected by events outside Oncor's control.

Changes in technology or increased electricity conservation efforts may reduce the value of Oncor's electricity delivery facilities and may significantly impact Oncor's business in other ways as well.

Research and development activities are ongoing to improve existing and alternative technologies to produce and store electricity, including ~~gas turbines,~~ fuel cells, batteries, microturbines, photovoltaic (solar) cells and concentrated solar thermal devices and batteries. It is possible that advances in these or other technologies will reduce the costs of electricity ~~production~~transmission, distribution and storage from these technologies to a level that will enable these technologies to compete effectively with traditional ~~generation~~transmission ~~plants. Changes~~and indistribution ~~technology could also alter the channels through which retail customers buy electricity~~assets. ~~To the extent self-generation facilities become a more cost-effective option for certain customers, our revenues could be materially reduced.~~

Also, electricity demand could be reduced by increased conservation efforts and advances in technology, which could likewise significantly reduce the value of Oncor's electricity delivery facilities. Certain regulatory and legislative bodies have introduced or are considering requirements and/or incentives to reduce energy consumption by a fixed date. Effective energy conservation by its customers could result in reduced energy demand, or significantly slow the growth in demand. Such reduction in demand could materially reduce its revenues. Furthermore, Oncor may incur increased capital expenditures if it is required to invest in conservation measures.

Oncor is dependent upon a limited number of suppliers and service providers for certain of its operations. If any of these suppliers or service providers failed or became unable to perform on their agreements with Oncor, it could disrupt Oncor's business and have an adverse effect on Oncor's cash flows, financial condition and results of operations.

Oncor relies on suppliers and service providers to provide it with certain specialized materials and services, including materials and services for power line maintenance, repair and construction, its advanced metering system, information technology and customer operations. The financial condition of Oncor's suppliers and service providers may be adversely affected by general economic conditions~~, such as credit risk~~. Because many of the tasks of these suppliers and service providers require specialized electric industry knowledge and equipment, if any of these parties fail to perform, or go out of business ~~or otherwise become unable to perform~~, Oncor may not be able to transition to substitute suppliers or service providers in a timely manner. This could delay Oncor's construction and improvement projects, increase its costs and disrupt its operations, which could negatively impact its business and reputation. In addition, Oncor could be subject to fines or penalties in the event a delay resulted in a violation of a PUCT or other regulatory order.

Oncor's revenues and results of operations are seasonal.

A significant portion of Oncor's revenues is derived from rates that Oncor collects from REPs based on the amount of electricity Oncor distributes on behalf of such REPs. Sales of electricity to residential and commercial customers are influenced by temperature fluctuations. Thus, Oncor's revenues and results of operations are subject to seasonality, weather conditions and other electricity usage drivers, with revenues being highest in the summer.

The litigation environment in which Oncor operates poses a significant risk to its business.

Oncor is involved in the ordinary course of business in a number of lawsuits involving employment, commercial and environmental issues, and other claims for injuries and damages, among other matters. Judges and juries in the State of Texas have demonstrated a willingness to grant large verdicts, including punitive damages, to plaintiffs in personal injury, property damage and business tort cases. Oncor uses appropriate means to contest litigation threatened or filed against it, but the litigation environment in the State of Texas poses a significant business risk.

The loss of the services of Oncor's key management and personnel could adversely affect Oncor's ability to operate its business.

Oncor's future success will depend on its ability to continue to attract and retain highly qualified personnel. Oncor competes for such personnel with many other companies, in and outside Oncor's industry, government entities and other organizations. Oncor may not be successful in retaining its current personnel or in hiring or retaining qualified personnel in the future. Failure to attract new personnel or retain existing personnel could have a material effect on Oncor's business.

EFIH has disclosed a material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting relating to its accounting for deferred income taxes, which could adversely affect EFIH's ability to report its financial condition, results of operations or cash flows accurately and on a timely basis.15

In connection with EFIH's assessment of internal control over financial reporting under Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, it identified a material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting relating to its accounting for deferred income taxes. For a discussion of EFIH's internal control over financial reporting and a description of the identified material weakness, see Management's Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting under Item 9A, Controls and Procedures.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of EFIH's annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Management's procedures and testing identified control deficiencies related to incomplete underlying data and insufficient documentation in the reconciliation process related to deferred income tax accounting that led management to conclude that control deficiencies existed at December 31, 2014. As a result of these deficiencies, until they are substantially remediated, it is reasonably possible that internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect errors in the financial statements from occurring that could have been material, either individually or in the aggregate.

While actions have been taken to improve EFIH's internal controls in response to the identified material weakness related to certain aspects of accounting for deferred income taxes, additional work continues to address and remediate the identified material weakness. Until these actions are fully implemented and tested, a material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting will continue to exist. As a result, EFIH's ability to timely or accurately report its future financial condition, results of operations or cash flows may be adversely affected.


Item 1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.


Item 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, EFIH may be involved in various legal and administrative proceedings in the normal course of business, the ultimate resolutions of which, in the opinion of management, should not have a material effect on its results of operations, liquidity or financial condition. See Note 10 to the Financial Statements for discussion of make-whole claim litigation.


Item 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

1816

PART II.


Item 5.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED EQUITY HOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

~~Not applicable.~~ EFIH's outstanding membership interest is held by EFH Corp.

See Note 11 to the Financial Statements for a description of cash distributions EFIH paid to EFH Corp. and the restrictions on EFIH's ability to pay such distributions.


Item 6.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

ENERGY FUTURE INTERMEDIATE HOLDING COMPANY LLC

SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

(millions of dollars, except ratios)

	At December 31,
	2014			2013			2012 (c)			2011			2010
	2015			2014			2013			2012			2011
Total assets	$	76,~~236~~416		$	67,~~252~~236		$	76,~~023~~252		$	97,~~517~~023		$	89,~~547~~517
Capitalization
Borrowings under debtor-in-possession credit facility	$	5,400		$	—		$	—		$	—		$	—
Borrowings under debtor-in-possession credit facility (a)	$	5,400		$	5,400		$	—		$	—		$	—
Debt (a)	—			7,877			6,954			3,436			3,172
Debt (b)	—			—			7,877			6,954			3,436
Prepetition notes reported as liabilities subject to compromise (a) (b)	3,876			—			—			—			—
Prepetition notes reported as liabilities subject to compromise (b) (c)	3,273			3,876			—			—			—
Membership interests	(2,~~203~~418		)	(12,~~822~~203		)	(~~179~~1,822		)	~~5,805~~(179		)	5,~~193~~805
Total	$	76,~~073~~255		$	67,~~055~~073		$	6,~~775~~055		$	96,~~241~~775		$	89,~~365~~241
Capitalization ratios
Borrowings under debtor-in-possession credit facility	7686.34		%	—76.3		%	—		%	—		%	—		%
Debt (a)	—		%	130.1		%	102.6		%	37.2		%	37.9		%
Debt (b)	—		%	—		%	130.1		%	102.6		%	37.2		%
Prepetition notes reported as liabilities subject to compromise (a) (b)	54.8		%	—		%	—		%	—		%	—		%
Prepetition notes reported as liabilities subject to compromise (b) (c)	52.3		%	54.8		%	—		%	—		%	—		%
Membership interests	(3138.17		)%	(3031.1		)%	(230.61		)%	62(2.86		)%	62.18		%
Total	100.0		%	100.0		%	100.0		%	100.0		%	100.0		%

	Year Ended December 31,
	2014			2013			2012 (d)			2011		2010
	2015			2014			2013			2012		2011
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary	$	(~~858~~721	)	$	(~~606~~858	)	$	72(606	)	$	~~204~~72	$	~~(106~~204	)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary (net of tax)	$	~~349~~334		$	~~335~~349		$	~~270~~335		$	~~286~~270	$	~~277~~286
Net income (loss)	$	(~~354~~299	)	$	(~~102~~354	)	$	~~315~~(102	)	$	~~417~~315	$	~~213~~417
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (c)	—			—			1.42			1.92		1.20
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (d)	—			—			—			1.42		1.92

____________

(a) ~~Includes~~Borrowings ~~push~~under ~~down~~the ofdebtor-in-possession ~~certain~~credit ~~EFH~~facility ~~Corp.~~are ~~(parent)~~classified ~~debt~~as due tocurrently ~~EFIH's~~as ~~guarantee~~ of ~~the~~December ~~debt~~31, ~~(see~~2015 ~~Note~~and 8as tononcurrent ~~the~~as ~~Financial~~of ~~Statements)~~December 31, 2014.

(b) Includes ~~both~~push ~~unsecured~~down ~~and~~of ~~secured~~certain ~~obligations~~EFH ~~incurred~~Corp. ~~prior~~(parent) debt due to ~~the~~EFIH's ~~Petition~~guarantee ~~Date,~~of ~~and~~the ~~includes~~debt ~~$33~~(see ~~million~~Note of9 ~~deferred~~to ~~debt~~the ~~issuance~~Financial ~~costs~~Statements).

(c) ~~Fixed~~Includes ~~charges~~both ~~exceeded~~unsecured ~~earnings~~and bysecured ~~$656~~obligations ~~million~~incurred prior to the Petition Date, and includes $~~393~~33 million ~~for~~of ~~years~~deferred ~~ended~~debt ~~December~~issuance ~~31,~~costs ~~2014~~as ~~and~~of ~~2013~~December 31, ~~respectively~~2014.

(d) ~~See~~Fixed ~~Note~~charges 11exceeded toearnings ~~the~~by ~~Financial~~$399 ~~Statements~~million, ~~for~~$656 ~~discussion~~million ofand ~~the~~$393 ~~reclassification~~million tofor ~~membership~~years ~~interests~~ended in December ~~2012~~31, of2015, ~~the~~2014 ~~EFH Corp.~~ and ~~TCEH~~2013, ~~debt EFIH held as an investment~~respectively.

See Notes to the Financial Statements.

1918

Quarterly Information (Unaudited)

Results of operations by quarter are summarized below. In EFIH's opinion, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair statement of such amounts have been made. Quarterly results are not necessarily indicative of a full year's operations because of seasonal and other factors. All amounts are in millions of dollars and may not add to full year amounts due to rounding.

	FirstQuarter			SecondQuarter			ThirdQuarter			FourthQuarter
2014:
2015:
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary (a)	$	(286	)	$	(482	)	$	(79	)	$	(11	)
Loss before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary (a)	$	(412	)	$	(142	)	$	(162	)	$	(5	)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary (net of tax)	$	8075		$	7275		$	~~123~~127		$	7457
Net income (loss) (a)	$	(~~134~~272	)	$	(~~292~~7	)	$	6945		$	3(65	)

	FirstQuarter			SecondQuarter			ThirdQuarter			FourthQuarter
2013:
2014:
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary (a)	$	100		$	(190	)	$	(196	)	$	(320	)
Loss before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary (a)	$	(286	)	$	(482	)	$	(79	)	$	(11	)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary (net of tax)	$	6780		$	7472		$	~~114~~123		$	8074
Net income (a)	$	131		$	(49	)	$	(14	)	$	(170	)
Net income (loss) (a)	$	(134	)	$	(292	)	$	69		$	3

____________

(a) For the years ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, EFIH fully reserved income tax receivables from EFH Corp. in the amounts of $~~125~~173 and $~~110~~125 million (see Note 54 to the Financial Statements).

2019


Item 7.	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of EFIH's financial condition and results of operations for the years ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013 should be read in conjunction with Item 6 - Selected Consolidated Financial Data and its audited consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements. Comparisons of year-over-year results are impacted by the effects of the ~~Bankruptcy~~Chapter ~~Filing~~11 Cases and the application of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 852, Reorganizations.

All dollar amounts in the tables in the following discussion and analysis are stated in millions of US dollars unless otherwise indicated.

Business

EFIH, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of EFH Corp., is a Dallas, Texas-based holding company whose wholly owned subsidiary, Oncor Holdings, holds a majority interest (approximately 80%) in Oncor. Oncor is a regulated electricity transmission and distribution company principally engaged in providing delivery services to REPs, including subsidiaries of TCEH, that sell electricity to residential, business and other consumers in Texas. Revenues from services provided to TCEH represented 25% ~~and 27%~~ of Oncor's total reported consolidated revenues for both the years ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013, respectively~~2014. EFIH has no reportable business segments. See Notes 1 and 3 to the Financial Statements for a discussion of the reporting of EFIH's investment in Oncor Holdings as an equity method investment and a description of the ring-fencing measures implemented with respect to Oncor Holdings and Oncor. These measures were put in place to mitigate Oncor's and Oncor Holdings' exposure to the Texas Holdings Group with the intent to minimize the risk that a court would order any of the assets and liabilities of the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities to be substantively consolidated with those of any member of the Texas Holdings Group in the event any such member were to become a debtor in a bankruptcy case. Consistent with these ring-fencing measures, the assets and liabilities of the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities have not been, and are not expected to be, substantively consolidated with the assets and liabilities of the Debtors in the Chapter 11 Cases.

Significant Activities and Events and Items Influencing Future Performance

Filing under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code — On April 29, 2014 (the Petition Date), EFH Corp. and the substantial majority of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including EFIH, EFCH and TCEH but excluding the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities, (the Debtors) filed voluntary petitions for relief (the Bankruptcy Filing) under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the Bankruptcy Code) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the Bankruptcy Court). During the pendency of the Bankruptcy Filing (Chapter 11 Cases), the Debtors ~~(including~~have ~~the~~operated ~~EFIH~~and ~~Debtors)~~ will continue to operate their businesses as "debtors-in-possession" under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.

For additional discussion of the ~~Chapter~~Bankruptcy 11Filing ~~Cases~~ and its effects, see Note 2 to the Financial Statements and Item 1A, Risk Factors – Risks Related to the Chapter 11 Cases. ~~See Note 6 to the Financial Statements for discussion of the EFIH DIP Facilities.~~

~~Proposed~~Confirmation ~~Sale~~ of ~~EFH~~the ~~Corp.'s~~Plan ~~Indirect~~of ~~Economic~~Reorganization ~~Ownership Interest in Oncor~~ — In ~~January~~September 2015, the ~~Bankruptcy Court approved the~~ Debtors' ~~bidding~~filed ~~procedures motion that sets forth~~ the ~~process~~Plan byof ~~which~~Reorganization ~~the Debtors are authorized to solicit proposals (i.e., bids) from third parties to acquire (in any form~~ and ~~employing~~Disclosure ~~any~~Statement ~~structure, whether taxable (in whole or in part) or tax-free) EFH Corp.'s indirect economic ownership interest in Oncor in accordance~~ with the Bankruptcy ~~Code~~Court. ~~These~~The ~~bidding~~Disclosure ~~procedures~~Statement ~~contemplate~~was ~~that~~approved ~~the Debtors select a stalking horse bid after a two-stage closed bidding process, and, after approval~~ by the Bankruptcy Court ofin ~~such~~September ~~stalking~~2015. In ~~horse~~October ~~bid~~2015, the Debtors ~~conduct~~filed athe ~~round~~Plan ~~of open bidding culminating in an auction intended to obtain a higher or otherwise best bid for a transaction~~Supplement. ~~Initial~~In ~~bids~~October ~~were received in early March~~ 2015, ~~and~~the ~~each~~Plan of ~~the~~Reorganization ~~Debtors~~was isapproved ~~currently~~by ~~assessing those submissions. For additional discussion see Note 2 to~~ the ~~Financial~~required ~~Statements~~creditors, and ~~Item~~in 1ADecember 2015, ~~Risk~~the ~~Factors~~Plan –of ~~Risks~~Reorganization ~~Related~~was toconfirmed by the ~~Chapter~~Bankruptcy ~~11 Cases~~Court.

~~Repayment~~Amended ofand ~~EFIH~~Restated ~~Second~~Settlement ~~Lien~~Agreement ~~Notes~~ — In ~~March~~December 2015, ~~with~~ the ~~approval~~Settling ofParties ~~the~~entered ~~Bankruptcy~~into Court, EFIH used some of its cash to repay (Repayment) $735 million, including interest at contractual rates, in amounts outstanding under EFIH's pre-petition 11.00% Second Lien Notes due 2021 (11.00% Notes) and 11.75% Second Lien Notes due 2022 (11.75% Notes) and $15 million in certain fees and expenses of the ~~trustee~~Amended ~~for such notes. The Repayment required the requisite consent of the lenders under the EFIH DIP Facility. EFIH received such consent from approximately 97% of the lenders under the EFIH DIP Facility~~ and ~~paid~~Restated anSettlement ~~aggregate consent fee equal to approximately $13 million. As a result of the Repayment~~Agreement, aswhich ofwas ~~the~~approved ~~date~~by ~~hereof,~~ the ~~principal~~Bankruptcy ~~amount~~Court ~~outstanding~~in onDecember ~~the 11~~2015.~~00% Notes and 11.75% are $322 million and $1.388 billion, respectively.~~

Extension of the DIP Facility — In January 2016, the EFIH Debtors paid a $13.5 million extension fee and extended the maturity date of the EFIH DIP Facility to the earlier of (a) December 2016 or (b) the effective date of any reorganization plan of EFIH. The terms of the facility were otherwise unchanged by the extension. See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for discussion of the DIP Facility.

Repayment of EFIH Second Lien Notes — In March 2015, with the approval of the Bankruptcy Court, EFIH repaid (Repayment) $735 million, including interest at contractual rates, in amounts outstanding under EFIH's pre-petition 11.00% Fixed Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due October 1, 2021 (11.00% Notes) and 11.75% Fixed Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due March 1, 2022 (11.75% Notes) and $15 million in certain fees and expenses of the trustee for such notes. The Repayment resulted in an $84 million reduction in the principal amount of the 11.00% Notes, a $361 million reduction in the principal amount of the 11.75% Notes and the payment of $235 million and $55 million of accrued and unpaid post-petition and pre-petition interest, respectively, at contractual rates. The Repayment required the requisite consent of the lenders under the DIP Facility. EFIH received such consent from approximately 97% of the lenders under the DIP Facility and paid an aggregate consent fee equal to approximately $13 million. As a result of the Repayment, as of the date hereof, the principal amount outstanding on the 11.00% Notes and 11.75% Notes are $322 million and $1.389 billion, respectively.

EFIH First Lien Notes Settlement — See Note 8 to the Financial Statements for discussion of the incurrence of the DIP Facility and the use of certain proceeds to settle the EFIH First Lien Notes.

Oncor Matters with the PUCT — Change in Control Review (PUCT Docket No. 45188) — In connection with the EFH Acquisition contemplated by the Plan of Reorganization, in September 2015 Oncor and the Purchasers in the EFH Acquisition filed a joint report and application for regulatory approvals pursuant to PURA. See Note 2 to the Financial Statements for further discussion regarding the EFH Acquisition and the Plan of Reorganization.

2008 Rate Review Filing (PUCT Docket No. 35717) — In August 2009, the PUCT issued a final order with respect to Oncor's June 2008 rate review filing with the PUCT and 204 cities based on a test year ended December 31, 2007, and new rates were implemented in September 2009. Oncor and four other parties appealed various portions of the rate review final order to a state district court. In January 2011, the district court signed its judgment reversing the PUCT with respect to two issues: the PUCT's disallowance of certain franchise fees and the PUCT's decision that PURA no longer requires imposition of a rate discount for state colleges and universities. Oncor filed an appeal with the Texas Third Court of Appeals (Austin Court of Appeals) in February 2011 with respect to the issues it appealed to the district court and did not prevail upon, as well as the district court's decision to reverse the PUCT with respect to discounts for state colleges and universities. In August 2014, the Austin Court of Appeals reversed the district court and affirmed the PUCT with respect to the PUCT's disallowance of certain franchise fees and the PUCT's decision that PURA no longer requires imposition of a rate discount for state colleges and universities. The Austin Court of Appeals also reversed the PUCT and district court's rejection of a proposed consolidated tax savings adjustment arising out of EFH Corp.'s ability to offset Oncor's taxable income against losses from other investments and remanded the issue to the PUCT to determine the amount of the consolidated tax savings adjustment. Oncor filed a motion on rehearing with the Austin Court of Appeals with respect to certain appeal issues on which Oncor was not successful, including the consolidated tax savings adjustment. In December 2014, the Austin Court of Appeals issued its opinion, clarifying that it was rendering judgment on the rate discount for state colleges and universities issue (affirming that PURA no longer requires imposition of the rate discount) rather than remanding it to the PUCT, and dismissing the motions for rehearing regarding the franchise fee issue and the consolidated tax savings adjustment. Oncor filed a petition for review with the Texas Supreme Court in February 2015. The Texas Supreme Court requested full briefing on the merits, and the briefing period ended in January 2016. In February 2016, the Texas Supreme Court granted the petition for review and noted that the date and time of oral arguments would be set at a later date. There is no deadline for the court to act. If Oncor's appeals efforts are unsuccessful and the proposed consolidated tax savings adjustment is implemented, Oncor estimates that on remand the impact on earnings of the consolidated tax savings adjustment's value could range from zero, as originally determined by the PUCT in Docket No. 35717, to a $135 million loss (after-tax) including taxes. Interest accrues at the PUCT approved rate for over-collections, which is 0.18% for 2016. Oncor does not believe that any of the other issues ruled upon by the Austin Court of Appeals would result in a material impact to its results of operations or financial condition.

Transmission Cost Recovery and Rates — In order to reflect increases or decreases in its wholesale transmission costs, including fees it pays to other transmission service providers, PUCT rules allow Oncor to update the transmission cost recovery factor (TCRF) component of its retail delivery rates charged to REPs on March 1 and September 1 each year. The table below lists TCRF filings impacting Oncor's cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2015, as well as filings that will impact Oncor's cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2016.



Docket No.	Filed	Effective	Semi-Annual Billing Impact Increase (Decrease)
45406	December 2015	March 2016 – August 2016	$	(64	)
44771	May 2015	September 2015 – February 2016	$	47
43858	December 2014	March 2015 – August 2015	$	(27	)
42558	May 2014	September 2014 – February 2015	$	71

~~EFIH~~Transmission ~~First~~Interim ~~Lien~~Rate ~~Notes~~Update ~~Settlement~~Applications — ~~See~~In ~~Note~~order 6 to ~~the~~reflect ~~Financial~~changes ~~Statements~~in ~~for~~its ~~discussion~~invested oftransmission ~~the~~capital, ~~incurrence~~PUCT rules allow Oncor to update its transmission cost of service (TCOS) rates by filing up to two interim TCOS rate adjustments in a calendar year. TCOS revenues are collected from load serving entities benefiting from Oncor's transmission system. REPs serving customers in Oncor's service territory are billed through the ~~EFIH~~TCRF ~~DIP~~mechanism ~~Facility~~discussed ~~and~~above while other load serving entities are billed directly. The table below lists Transmission Interim Rate Update Applications impacting Oncor's revenues for the ~~use~~year ofended ~~certain~~December 31, ~~proceeds~~2015, toas ~~settle~~well as filings that will impact Oncor's revenues for the ~~EFIH~~year ~~First~~ended ~~Lien~~December ~~Notes~~31, 2016.

Oncor Credit Risk Exposure to EFH Corp. and its Subsidiaries — As a result of the Bankruptcy Filing, Oncor had credit risk exposure to trade accounts receivable from TCEH, which related to delivery services provided by Oncor to TCEH's retail electricity operations. At the Petition Date, these accounts receivable totaled $109 million. In June 2014, the Bankruptcy Court authorized the TCEH Debtors to pay all pre-petition delivery charges due Oncor, and such amounts were paid in full.



Docket No.	Filed	Effective	Oncor's Annual Revenue Impact		Third-Party Wholesale Transmission		Included in TCRF
44968	July 2015	September 2015	$	21	$	14	$	7
44363	January 2015	March 2015	$	35	$	23	$	12
42706	July 2014	September 2014	$	12	$	8	$	4
42267	February 2014	April 2014	$	74	$	47	$	27

~~EFH~~Application ~~Corp~~for 2016 Energy Efficiency Cost Recovery Factor Surcharge (PUCT Docket No., ~~Oncor~~44784) ~~Holdings~~— In June 2015, Oncor ~~and~~filed an application with the PUCT to request approval of the energy efficiency cost recovery factor (EECRF) for 2016. PUCT rules require Oncor's ~~minority~~to ~~investor~~make ~~are~~an ~~parties~~annual EECRF filing by the first business day in June in each year for implementation on March 1 of the next calendar year. The requested 2016 EECRF was $67 million as compared to a$68 ~~Federal~~million established for 2015, and ~~State~~would ~~Income~~result ~~Tax~~in ~~Allocation~~an ~~Agreement~~average monthly charge for residential customers of $1.19 as compared to the 2015 average monthly residential charge of $1.23 per month. ~~Additional~~Average ~~income~~monthly ~~tax~~charges ~~amounts~~are ~~receivable~~for ora ~~payable~~residential ~~may~~customer ~~arise~~using in1,200 kilowatt-hours. In September 2015, the ~~normal~~PUCT ~~course~~issued ~~under~~a ~~that~~final ~~agreement~~order approving the 2016 EECRF, which is designed to recover $61 million of Oncor's costs for the 2016 program year, a $10 million performance bonus based on Oncor's 2013 results and a $4 million decrease for over-recovery of 2014 costs.

Further, EFIH had current income tax receivables arising under the Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement from EFH Corp. which totaled $125 million and $110 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Because of the significant uncertainty regarding the ultimate settlement of these amounts due to the Bankruptcy Filing, the income tax receivables were fully reserved, resulting in charges of $125 million and $110 million for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, reported in other deductions. Additionally, as of December 31, 2014, Oncor has a noncurrent tax receivable from EFH Corp. of $64 million arising from the Oncor Tax Sharing Agreement.

Settlement of Make-Whole Agreements with Oncor — See Note 12 to the Financial Statements for discussion of the settlement in 2012 of EFIH's interest and tax-related reimbursement agreements with Oncor associated with Oncor's bankruptcy-remote financing subsidiary's securitization bonds.

Oncor's Investment in Transmission and Distribution Infrastructure — Oncor expects its capital expenditures on transmission and distribution infrastructure to total approximately $1.1 billion in 2015. Oncor's management currently expects to recommend to its board of directors capital expenditures of approximately $1.4 billion in 2016 and approximately $1.5 billion in each of the years 2017 through 2020. These capital expenditures are expected to be used for investment in transmission and distribution infrastructure, including approximately $1.2 billion in the period 2015 through 2018 that Oncor currently expects to use for electric infrastructure enhancement in the West Texas region.

Oncor Matters with the PUCT — Application for Reconciliation of Advanced Meter Surcharge (PUCT Docket No. 41814) — In September 2013, Oncor filed an application with the PUCT for reconciliation of all costs incurred and investments made from January 1, 2011 through December 31, 2012, in the deployment of Oncor's advanced metering system (AMS) pursuant to the AMS Deployment Plan approved in Docket No. 35718. During the 2011 to 2012 period, Oncor incurred approximately $300 million of capital expenditures and $34 million of operating and maintenance expense, and billed customers approximately $174 million through the AMS surcharge. Oncor was not seeking a change in the AMS surcharge in this proceeding. In November 2013, Oncor filed an amended request and the PUCT Staff filed its recommendation concluding that all costs presented in the amended application, with the exception of less than $1,000 of expenses, are appropriate for recovery. In December 2013, the PUCT issued its final order in the proceeding agreeing with the PUCT Staff's recommendation, finding that costs expended and investments made in the deployment of Oncor's AMS through December 31, 2012 were properly allocated, reasonable and necessary.

Competitive Renewable Energy Zones (CREZs) (PUCT Docket Nos. 35665 and 37902) — In 2009, the PUCT awarded Oncor CREZ construction projects. These projects involve the construction of transmission lines and stations to support the transmission of electricity from renewable energy sources, principally wind generation facilities, in the western part of Texas to population centers in the eastern part of Texas, as well as building additional facilities to provide further voltage support to the transmission grid as a result of CREZ. At December 31, 2014, Oncor's cumulative CREZ-related capital expenditures totaled $2.011 billion, including $140 million in 2014.

2008 Rate Review Filing (PUCT Docket No. 35717) — In August 2009, the PUCT issued a final order with respect to Oncor's June 2008 rate review filing with the PUCT and 204 cities based on a test year ended December 31, 2007, and new rates were implemented in September 2009. Oncor and four other parties appealed various portions of the rate review final order to a state district court. In January 2011, the district court signed its judgment reversing the PUCT with respect to two issues: the PUCT's disallowance of certain franchise fees and the PUCT's decision that PURA no longer requires imposition of a rate discount for state colleges and universities. Oncor filed an appeal with the Texas Third Court of Appeals (Austin Court of Appeals) in February 2011 with respect to the issues it appealed to the district court and did not prevail upon, as well as the district court's decision to reverse the PUCT with respect to discounts for state colleges and universities. In August 2014, the Austin Court of Appeals reversed the district court and affirmed the PUCT with respect to the PUCT's disallowance of certain franchise fees and the PUCT's decision that PURA no longer requires imposition of a rate discount for state colleges and universities. The Austin Court of Appeals also reversed the PUCT and district court's rejection of a proposed consolidated tax savings adjustment arising out of EFH Corp.'s ability to offset Oncor's taxable income against losses from other investments and remanded the issue to the PUCT to determine the amount of the consolidated tax savings adjustment. In late August 2014, Oncor filed a motion on rehearing with the Austin Court of Appeals with respect to certain appeal issues on which Oncor was not successful, including the consolidated tax savings adjustment. In December 2014, the Austin Court of Appeals issued its Opinion on Rehearing, clarifying that it was rendering judgment on the rate discount for state colleges and universities issue (affirming that PURA no longer requires imposition of the rate discount) rather than remanding it to the PUCT, and dismissing the motions for rehearing regarding the franchise fee issue and the consolidated tax savings adjustment. Oncor filed a petition for review with the Texas Supreme Court in February 2015. If Oncor's appeals efforts are unsuccessful and the proposed consolidated tax savings adjustment is implemented, Oncor estimates that on remand the impact on earnings of the consolidated tax savings adjustment's value could range from zero, as originally determined by the PUCT in Docket No. 35717, to a $130 million loss (after tax). Oncor does not believe that any of the other issues ruled upon by the Austin Court of Appeals would result in a material impact to its results of operations or financial condition.

Transmission Cost Recovery and Rates (PUCT Docket Nos. 43858, 42558, 42059 and 41543) — In order to reflect increases or decreases in its wholesale transmission costs, including fees it pays to other transmission service providers, PUCT rules allow Oncor to update the transmission cost recovery factor (TCRF) component of its retail delivery rates charged to REPs on March 1 and September 1 each year. In December 2014, Oncor filed an application to update the TCRF, which became effective March 1, 2015. This application was designed to reduce Oncor's billings for the period from March 2015 through August 2015 by $27 million. In May 2014, Oncor filed an application to update the TCRF, which became effective September 1, 2014. This application was designed to increase Oncor's billings for the period from September 2014 through February 2015 by $71 million. In December 2013, Oncor filed an application to update the TCRF, which became effective March 1, 2014. This application was designed to increase Oncor's billings for the period from March 2014 through August 2014 by $44 million. In June 2013, Oncor filed an application to update the TCRF, which became effective September 1, 2013. This application was designed to increase Oncor's billings for the period from September 2013 through February 2014 by $88 million.

Transmission Interim Rate Update Applications (PUCT Docket Nos. 44363, 42706, 42267, 41706 and 41166) — In order to reflect changes in its invested transmission capital, PUCT rules allow Oncor to update its transmission cost of service (TCOS) rates by filing up to two interim TCOS rate adjustments in a calendar year. TCOS revenues are collected from load serving entities benefiting from Oncor's transmission system. REPs serving customers in Oncor's service territory are billed through the TCRF mechanism discussed above while other load serving entities are billed directly. In January 2015, Oncor filed an application for an interim update of its TCOS rate. The new rate was approved by the PUCT and became effective in March 2015. Oncor's annualized revenues increased by an estimated $35 million with approximately $23 million of this increase recoverable through transmission costs charged to wholesale customers and $12 million recoverable from REPs through the TCRF component of Oncor's delivery rates.

In July 2014, Oncor filed an application for an interim update of its TCOS rate. The new rate was approved by the PUCT and became effective in September 2014. Oncor's annualized revenues increased by an estimated $12 million with approximately $8 million of this increase recoverable through transmission costs charged to wholesale customers and $4 million recoverable from REPs through the TCRF component of Oncor's delivery rates. In February 2014, Oncor filed an application for an interim update of its TCOS rate. The new rate was approved by the PUCT and became effective in April 2014. Oncor's annualized revenues increased by an estimated $74 million with approximately $47 million of this increase recoverable through transmission costs charged to wholesale customers and $27 million recoverable from REPs through the TCRF component of Oncor's delivery rates.

In July 2013, Oncor filed an application for an interim update of its TCOS rate. The new rate was approved by the PUCT and became effective in September 2013. Oncor's annualized revenues increased by an estimated $71 million with approximately $45 million of this increase recoverable through transmission costs charged to wholesale customers and $26 million recoverable from REPs through the TCRF component of Oncor's delivery rates. In January 2013, Oncor filed an application for an interim update of its TCOS rate. The new rate was approved by the PUCT and became effective in March 2013. Oncor's annualized revenues increased by an estimated $27 million with approximately $17 million of this increase recoverable through transmission costs charged to wholesale customers and $10 million recoverable from REPs through the TCRF component of Oncor's delivery rates.

Application for 2015 Energy Efficiency Cost Recovery Factor Surcharge (PUCT Docket No. 42559) — In May 2014, Oncor filed an application with the PUCT to request approval of the energy efficiency cost recovery factor (EECRF) for 2015. PUCT rules require Oncor to make an annual EECRF filing by the first business day in June in each year for implementation on March 1 of the next calendar year. The requested 2015 EECRF was $68 million as compared to $73 million established for 2014, and would result in a monthly charge for residential customers of $1.03 as compared to the 2014 residential charge of $1.01 per month. In October 2014, the PUCT issued a final order approving the 2015 EECRF, which is designed to recover $50 million of Oncor's costs for the 2015 program year, a $23 million performance bonus based on Oncor's 2013 results and a $5 million decrease for over-recovery of 2013 costs.

Summary — EFIH cannot predict future regulatory or legislative actions or any changes in economic and securities market conditions. Such actions or changes could significantly affect EFIH's results of operations, liquidity or financial condition.

KEY RISKS AND CHALLENGES

Following is a discussion of key risks and challenges facing management and the initiatives currently underway to manage such challenges. These matters involve risks that could have a material effect on EFIH's results of operations, liquidity or financial condition. Also see Item 1A, Risk Factors.

Chapter 11 Cases

As discussed above, EFIH filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. For the duration of the Chapter 11 Cases, EFIH will be subject to various risks, including but not limited to (i) the inability to maintain or obtain sufficient financing sources for operations or to fund any reorganization plan and meet future obligations, and (ii) increased legal and other professional costs associated with the Chapter 11 Cases and EFIH's reorganization.

The duration of the Chapter 11 Cases is difficult to estimate and ultimately could be lengthy. IfThe effectiveness of the ~~EFIH~~Plan ~~Debtors~~of ~~are~~Reorganization ~~unable~~is subject to ~~file~~the asatisfaction ~~Chapter~~of 11certain ~~plan~~conditions (some of ~~reorganization,~~which orare ~~solicit~~not ~~the~~within ~~appropriate~~EFIH's ~~votes~~control). There ~~for~~can be no assurance that such ~~plan,~~conditions inwill ~~each~~be ~~case~~satisfied, ~~prior~~and totherefore, that the ~~expiration~~effectiveness of the ~~exclusivity~~Plan ~~period~~of ~~granted~~Reorganization bywill occur. If the ~~Bankruptcy~~effective ~~Court~~date ~~(currently~~of ~~June~~the 23reorganization does not occur, ~~2015~~it may become necessary to amend the Plan of Reorganization to provide for ~~filing~~alternative atreatment ~~Chapter~~of 11claims ~~plan~~and interests which may result in holders of ~~reorganization~~claims and ~~August~~interests ~~23,~~receiving ~~2015~~significantly less or no value for ~~soliciting~~their claims and interests in the ~~appropriate~~Chapter 11 Cases. If any modifications to the Plan of Reorganization are material, it may be necessary to re-solicit votes ~~for~~from holders of claims and interests adversely affected by the modifications with respect to such ~~plan),~~Plan. The ~~third~~resulting ~~parties~~delay could ~~file~~require ~~their~~EFIH ~~own~~to ~~plan~~extend or ~~plans~~refinance ofits ~~reorganization~~DIP Facility and could adversely impact its liquidity. ~~Any~~EFIH ~~such~~will ~~third~~also ~~party~~be ~~plan~~required to seek approvals of certain federal and state regulators in connection with the Chapter 11 Cases, which approvals may be denied, conditioned or ~~plans~~delayed, ~~will~~and ~~likely~~certain parties may intervene and protest approval. An extended duration of the Chapter 11 Cases due to these factors could exacerbate the ~~duration,~~risks ~~cost~~identified above and the contentiousness of the Chapter 11 Cases.

ToWhile ~~mitigate~~EFIH ~~the~~is ~~risks~~operating ~~discussed~~under ~~above~~Chapter 11, ~~EFIH~~transactions ~~has~~outside ~~engaged~~of ~~outside~~the ~~counsel~~ordinary ~~and~~course ~~other~~of ~~advisors~~business ~~who~~will ~~are~~be ~~experts~~subject to the prior approval of the Bankruptcy Court, which may limit its ability to respond in ~~bankruptcy~~a ~~matters~~timely manner to ~~assist~~certain itevents ~~with~~or ~~legal~~take advantage of certain opportunities. Additionally, the terms of the DIP Facility and ~~administrative~~the ~~matters~~Plan ~~related~~of Reorganization limit its ability to ~~the~~undertake ~~Chapter~~certain 11business ~~Cases~~initiatives.

The Debtors (including EFIH) have engaged outside counsel and other advisors who are experts in bankruptcy matters to assist their management and other employees with legal and administrative matters related to the Chapter 11 Cases to minimize disruption to and distraction from their business operations and to help ensure that they have sufficient liquidity through the duration of the Chapter 11 Cases.

Oncor's Rates and Cost Recovery

Oncor's rates are regulated by the PUCT and certain cities and are subject to regulatory rate-setting processes and annual earnings oversight. This regulatory treatment does not provide any assurance as to achievement of earnings levels. Oncor's rates are regulated based on an analysis of their costs and capital structure, as reviewed and approved in a regulatory proceeding. Rate regulation is premised on the full recovery of prudently incurred costs and a reasonable rate of return on invested capital. However, there is no assurance that the PUCT will judge all of Oncor's costs to have been prudently incurred, that the PUCT will not reduce the amount of invested capital included in the capital structure that Oncor's rates are based upon, that the regulatory process in which rates are determined will always result in rates that produce full recovery of Oncor's costs or that Oncor's authorized return on equity will not be reduced. See Significant Activities and Events and Items Influencing Future Performance – Oncor Matters with the PUCT.

Oncor's Capital Availability and Cost

~~EFIH's investment in~~ Oncor~~, which represents approximately 80% of Oncor~~'s ~~membership interests, is a significant value driver of EFIH's overall business. Oncor's~~ access to capital markets and cost of debt could be directly affected by its credit ratings. Any adverse action with respect to Oncor's credit ratings could generally cause borrowing costs to increase and the potential pool of investors and funding sources to decrease and could result in reduced distributions from Oncor. Oncor's credit ratings are currently substantially higher than those of the Texas Holdings Group. If credit rating agencies were to change their views of Oncor's independence from any member of the Texas Holdings Group, Oncor's credit ratings would likely decline. EFIH believes these risks are substantially mitigated by the significant ring-fencing measures implemented by EFH Corp. and Oncor as described in Note 1 to the Financial Statements.

Oncor's Technology Initiatives

Risks to Oncor's technology initiative programs include nonperformance by equipment and service providers, failure of the technology to meet performance expectations and inadequate cost recovery allowances by regulatory authorities. Oncor is implementing measures to mitigate these risks, but there can be no assurance that these technology initiatives will achieve the operational and financial objectives.

Oncor's Cyber Security and Infrastructure Protection Risk

A breach of Oncor's cyber/data or physical security measures that impairs Oncor's information technology infrastructure or transmission and distribution infrastructure could disrupt normal business operations, affect its ability to control its transmission and distribution system, expose Oncor to material regulatory claims and limit communication with third parties. Any loss of confidential or proprietary data through a cyber/data breach could also materially affect Oncor's reputation, expose the company to legal claims or impair its ability to execute on business strategies. Oncor participates in industry groups and with regulators to remain current on emerging threats and mitigating techniques. While it has not experienced any security breach with a significant operational, reputational or financial impact, Oncor recognizes the growing threat within its industry and is proactively taking steps to continuously improve its technology, security measures, processes and services to detect, mitigate and protect its assets, both physical and cyber.

2523

APPLICATION OF CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

EFIH's significant accounting policies are discussed in Note 1 to the Financial Statements. EFIH follows accounting principles generally accepted in the US. Application of these accounting policies in the preparation of its consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the reporting of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet dates and income and expenses during the periods covered. The following is a summary of certain critical accounting policies that are impacted by judgments and uncertainties and under which different amounts might be reported using different assumptions or estimation methodologies.

Investment in Affiliate Debt

EFIH holds debt securities of EFH Corp. and TCEH that it acquired through debt exchanges. The securities were held as available for sale securities and were recorded at fair value, within the income statement as interest income. EFIH evaluated its affiliate debt for impairment and recorded an impairment loss if declines in fair value were deemed to be other than temporary, which occurred if it determined it would be unable to recover the carrying value of the investment. Impairments were accounted for as a reduction of interest income if related to the issuer's credit. If they were not related to the issuer's credit, the impairments were recorded in other comprehensive income. As discussed in Note 11 to the Financial Statements these securities were classified as a reduction of membership interests at December 31, 2012 and thus, were no longer carried as available for sale securities.

Push Down of Merger-Related Debt

Merger-related debt of EFH Corp. and its subsidiaries consists of debt issued or existing at the time of the Merger. Debt issued in exchange for Merger-related debt is considered Merger-related. Debt issuances are considered Merger-related debt to the extent the proceeds are used to repurchase Merger-related debt. Merger-related debt of EFH Corp. (parent) that is fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a joint and several basis by EFCH and EFIH is subject to push down in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 5-J, and as a result, a portion of such debt and related interest expense is reflected in EFIH's financial statements. Merger-related debt of EFH Corp. held by its subsidiaries is not subject to push down. The amount reflected in EFIH's balance sheet represents 50% of the EFH Corp. Merger-related debt guaranteed by EFIH. This percentage reflects the fact that at the time of the Merger, the equity investments of EFCH and EFIH in their respective operating subsidiaries were essentially equal amounts. Because payment of principal and interest on the debt is the responsibility of EFH Corp., EFIH records the settlement of such amounts (net of income tax) as noncash capital contributions from EFH Corp. As a result of transactions completed in January 2013, $60 million principal amount of debt remains subject to push down at both December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and December 31, ~~2013~~2014. See Note 89 to the Financial Statements.

Investment in Oncor Holdings

EFIH's balance sheet reflects its investment in Oncor Holdings, which holds an approximate 80% interest in Oncor, as an equity method investment. See Note 3 to the Financial Statements for additional information regarding the accounting for EFIH's investment in Oncor Holdings.

Impairment of Equity Method Investment

EFIH evaluates its investment in Oncor Holdings for impairment when factors indicate that a decrease in value has occurred that is not temporary. Indications of a loss in value include recurring operating losses of Oncor Holdings or a fair value of the investment that is less than its carrying amount. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying value of the investment is greater than the fair value of the investment, and the loss is not deemed temporary. ~~Fair value is based on analyses that reflect discounted cash flows and values of comparable companies.~~ The determination of the existence of impairment indicators and the determination of fair value involves judgments that are subjective in nature and require the use of estimates in forecasting future results and cash flows.

Accounting for Income Taxes

EFH Corp. files a US federal income tax return that includes the results of EFCH, EFIH, Oncor Holdings and TCEH. Oncor is a partnership for US federal income tax purposes and is not a corporate member of the EFH Corp. consolidated group.

EFH Corp. and its subsidiaries (including EFCH, EFIH, and TCEH, but not including Oncor Holdings and Oncor) are parties to a Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement, which provides, among other things, that each of EFCH, EFIH, TCEH and any other subsidiaries under the agreement is required to make payments to EFH Corp. in an amount calculated to approximate the amount of tax liability such entity would have owed if it filed a separate corporate tax return. Accordingly, EFIH's income tax expense and related balance sheet amounts are recorded as if it files its own corporate income tax returns. Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities as required under accounting rules. Income tax assets and liabilities related to pushed down debt are settled as membership interests transactions.

EFH Corp., Oncor Holdings, Oncor and Oncor's third-party minority investor are parties to a Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement, which governs the computation of federal income tax liability among such parties, and similarly provides, among other things, that each of Oncor Holdings and Oncor will pay EFH Corp. its share of an amount calculated to approximate the amount of tax liability such entity would have owed if it filed a separate corporate tax return.

EFIH's income tax expense and related consolidated balance sheet amounts involve significant management estimates and judgments. Amounts of deferred income tax assets and liabilities, as well as current and noncurrent accruals, involve estimates and judgments of the timing and probability of recognition of income and deductions by taxing authorities. In assessing the likelihood of realization of deferred tax assets, management considers estimates of the amount and character of future taxable income. Actual income taxes could vary from estimated amounts due to the future impacts of various items, including changes in income tax laws, EFIH's forecasted financial condition and results of operations in future periods, as well as final review of filed tax returns by taxing authorities. EFH Corp.'s income tax returns are regularly subject to examination by applicable tax authorities. In management's opinion, pursuant to income tax accounting guidance related to uncertain tax positions, there is no material liability for future taxes that may be owed as a result of any examination.

See Notes 1 and 45 to the Financial Statements for discussion of income tax matters.

Accounting in Reorganization

Consolidated financial statements for periods following the Petition Date have been prepared in accordance with ASC 852, Reorganizations, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities on a going concern basis. However, as a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, such realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities are subject to a number of uncertainties. ASC 852 requires the following:


•	Reclassification of unsecured or under-secured pre-petition debt, including unamortized deferred financing costs and discounts/premiums associated with debt, and other liabilities to a separate line item in the consolidated balance sheets, called "Liabilities subject to compromise;"


•	Nonaccrual of interest expense for financial reporting purposes, to the extent not paid during bankruptcy;

• Reporting in a new line in the statements of consolidated income (loss) of incremental items of income or loss related to bankruptcy, such as professional fees, as well as adjustments of liabilities to their estimated allowed claim amounts and ultimately settlement amounts as a separate line item in the statements of consolidated income (loss);


•	Evaluation of actual or potential bankruptcy claims, which are not already reflected as a liability on the consolidated balance sheets, under ASC 450, Contingencies. If valid unrecorded claims meeting the ASC 450 criteria are presented to EFIH in future periods, EFIH will accrue for these amounts at the expected amount of the allowed claim, and


•	Upon emergence from Chapter 11 reorganization, fresh-start accounting under GAAP may be required. Under fresh-start accounting, the reorganization value of the entity would be allocated to the entity's individual assets and liabilities on a fair value basis in conformity with the procedures specified by ASC 805, Business Combinations.

2725

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Financial Results – Year Ended December 31, 2015 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2014

Selling, general, and administrative expenses decreased $16 million to $6 million in 2015. The 2015 amount includes $5 million in allocated shared services costs. The 2014 amount includes $15 million for legal and other professional services associated with EFIH's debt restructuring activities prior to the Petition Date, of which $4 million was allocated by EFH Corp. The 2014 amount also includes $3 million in allocated Sponsor Group management fees and $4 million in allocated shared services costs. Payments of Sponsor Group management fees and associated cost allocations were suspended beginning with the payment due December 31, 2013. See Note 12 to the Financial Statements for discussion of allocations from EFH Corp.

Other deductions increased $45 million to $173 million in 2015, primarily reflecting the recording of a larger reserve against EFIH's income tax receivable from EFH Corp. in 2015 (see Note 4 to the Financial Statements).

Interest expense and related charges increased $28 million to $469 million in 2015. The increase reflected $109 million higher interest expense on debtor-in-possession financing and $17 million in lower amortization of pre-petition debt premiums, discounts and issuance costs due to discontinuance of amortization and reclassification of such amounts to liabilities subject to compromise in 2014, partially offset by $98 million in lower interest expense on pre-petition debt due to the discontinuation of interest upon the Bankruptcy Filing.

Reorganization items totaled $73 million and $267 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively. Activity in 2015 included $111 million in legal advisory and representation services, $30 million in other professional consulting and advisory services and $28 million in fees associated with the repayment of EFIH Second Lien Notes, partially offset by $89 million related to the adjustment of expected allowed clams of pre-petition debt to remove debt issuance costs and debt premiums/discounts and $7 million in gains due to the settlement of affiliate balances and liabilities under a management agreement with EFIH's Sponsors. Activity in 2014 included $50 million in legal advisory and representation services fees, a $108 million net loss on the exchange and settlement of the EFIH First Lien Notes and $94 million in fees associated with completion of the DIP Facility. See Note 7 to the Financial Statements for additional discussion.

Income tax benefit totaled $88 million and $155 million in 2015 and 2014, respectively. Pretax amounts exclude equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries. Excluding the effect of the reserve against the income tax receivable from EFH Corp. in 2015 and 2014 (see Notes 4 and 5 to the Financial Statements) that was recorded without income tax effect and the valuation allowances recorded in 2015 and 2014, the effective tax rate was 30.4% in 2015 compared to 30.9% in 2014. The decrease in the effective income tax rate is driven primarily by higher nondeductible legal and other professional services costs related to the Chapter 11 Cases in 2015.

Equity in earnings of EFIH's Oncor Holdings unconsolidated subsidiary (net of tax) decreased $15 million to $334 million in 2015. The decrease in equity earnings of Oncor reflected higher operation and maintenance expense, depreciation and amortization, other deductions, lower energy efficiency performance bonus and property taxes, partially offset by increased revenue from higher distribution base revenues driven by growth in points of delivery, higher transmission base revenues, lower interest expense and lower income taxes. See Note 3 to the Financial Statements.

Net loss decreased $55 million to $299 million in 2015. The change was driven by a decrease in reorganization items, partially offset by an increase in the valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets.

Financial Results – Year Ended December 31, 2014 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2013

Selling, general, and administrative expenses increased $2 million to $22 million in 2014. The 2014 amount includes $15 million for legal and other professional services associated with EFIH's debt restructuring activities prior to the Petition Date, of which $4 million was allocated by EFH Corp. The 2014 amount also includes $3 million in allocated Sponsor Group management fees and $4 million in allocated other shared services costs. Payments of Sponsor Group management fees and associated cost allocations were suspended beginning with the payment due December 31, 2013. The 2013 amount reflects legal and other consulting services costs associated with EFH Corp.'s debt restructuring initiatives, of which $12 million was allocated by EFH Corp. See Note 12 to the Financial Statements for discussion of allocations from EFH Corp.

Other deductions increased $18 million to $128 million in 2014, primarily reflecting the recording of a larger reserve against EFIH's income tax receivable from EFH Corp. in 2014 (see Note 54 to the Financial Statements).

Interest income – affiliates decreased $284 million to zero in 2014. The decline reflects reclassification in 2013 of mark-to-market gains on certain holdings of affiliate debt from accumulated other comprehensive income to interest income resulting from the 2013 distribution of all EFH Corp. 10.875% Notes and EFH Corp. Toggle Notes held by EFIH. See Notes 11 and 13 to the Financial Statements.

Interest expense and related charges decreased $319 million to $441 million in 2014. The decrease reflected $479 million in lower interest expense on pre-petition debt due to the discontinuation of interest upon the Bankruptcy Filing, partially offset by $125 million in interest expense on debtor-in-possession financing and $35 million in lower amortization of pre-petition debt premiums, discounts and issuance costs due to discontinuance of amortization and reclassification of such amounts to liabilities subject to compromise

Reorganization items totaled $267 million in 2014 and included $50 million in legal advisory and representation services fees, a $108 million net loss on the exchange and settlement of the EFIH First Lien Notes and $94 million in fees associated with completion of the ~~EFIH First Lien~~ DIP Facility. See Note 7 to the Financial Statements for additional discussion.

Income tax benefit totaled $155 million and $169 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively. Pretax amounts exclude equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries. Excluding the effect of the reserve against the income tax receivable from EFH Corp. (see Notes 4 and 5 to the Financial Statements) that was recorded without income tax benefit, the effective tax rate was 21.1% in 2014 compared to 34.1% in 2013. The decrease in the effective income tax rate is driven primarily by a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets and higher nondeductible legal and other professional services costs related to the Chapter 11 Cases in 2014.

Equity in earnings of EFIH's Oncor Holdings unconsolidated subsidiary (net of tax) increased $14 million to $349 million in 2014. The increase in equity earnings of Oncor reflected increased revenue from higher transmission rates and lower interest expense. These favorable effects were partially offset by higher income taxes reflecting the $11 million favorable tax effect in 2013 due to resolution of certain income tax positions and an increase in non-deductible amortization of regulatory assets, higher depreciation, higher operation and maintenance expense and higher property taxes. See Note 3 to the Financial Statements.

Net loss increased $252 million to $354 million in 2014. The change was driven by a decrease in interest income - affiliates, the existence of reorganization items in 2014 and the reserve against the income tax receivable from EFH Corp., partially offset by lower interest expense on pre-petition debt and higher equity in earnings of Oncor Holdings.

~~Financial Results – Year Ended December 31, 2013 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2012~~ 27

Selling, general, and administrative expenses totaled $20 million in 2013, and no amounts were recorded in 2012. The 2013 amount reflects legal and other professional services costs associated with EFH Corp.'s debt restructuring initiatives, of which $12 million was allocated by EFH Corp. (see Note 12 to the Financial Statements).

Other deductions totaled $110 million in 2013, reflecting the recording of a reserve against EFIH's income tax receivable from EFH Corp. (see Note 5 to the Financial Statements).

Interest income – affiliates decreased $314 million to $284 million in 2013. The decline reflects the reclassification of affiliate debt EFIH holds that resulted in interest received on such debt in 2013 being recorded as an increase in membership interests instead of interest income. This impact was partially offset by $284 million in interest income in 2013 that represents previous mark-to-market gains on certain holdings of affiliate debt reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income. See Note 13 to the Financial Statements for discussion of these reclassifications.

Interest expense and related charges increased $234 million to $760 million in 2013. The increase was driven by the issuance of EFIH Notes in 2012 and 2013 (see Note 9 to the Financial Statements).

Income tax benefit totaled $169 million in 2013 on a pretax loss compared to income tax expense of $27 million on pretax income in 2012. Pretax amounts exclude equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries. Excluding the effect of the reserve against the income tax receivable that was recorded without income tax benefit, the effective tax rate was 34.1% in 2013 compared to 37.5% in 2012. The change in the effective income tax rate is due largely to the effects of a relatively large pretax loss in 2013 compared to the small pretax income amount in 2012. See Note 4 to the Financial Statements for a reconciliation of the effective rates to the US federal statutory rate.

Equity in earnings of EFIH's Oncor Holdings unconsolidated subsidiary (net of tax) increased $65 million to $335 million in 2013. The increase in equity earnings of Oncor reflected an $11 million favorable tax effect in 2013 due to resolution of certain income tax positions at Oncor and a $31 million unfavorable impact in 2012 from the settlement of a management incentive pay plan. The settlement resulted in a $57 million pretax charge reported by Oncor. Excluding these items, the increase in Oncor's earnings reflected higher revenues from higher transmission rates, the effect of colder fall/winter weather and growth in points of delivery, partially offset by higher operation and maintenance expenses and higher depreciation. See Note 3 to the Financial Statements.

Net loss totaled $102 million in 2013 compared to net income of $315 million in 2012. The $417 million change was driven by a decrease in interest income, an increase in interest expense and the reserve against the income tax receivable from EFH Corp., partially offset by higher equity in earnings of Oncor Holdings.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Operating Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 Compared to Year Ended December 31, ~~2013~~2014 — Cash used in operating activities totaled $~~243~~294 million in ~~2014~~2015 and $~~428~~243 million in ~~2013~~2014, respectively. The ~~decrease~~increase in cash used of $~~185~~51 million was primarily driven by $~~243~~150 million in ~~lower~~higher cash interest payments ~~due~~related to the ~~discontinuation~~repayment ofon ~~interest~~the ~~paid~~EFIH onSecond ~~pre-petition~~Lien ~~debt~~Notes (see Note 96 to the Financial Statements), partially offset by $120 million in higher ~~legal~~distribution ~~and~~of ~~other~~earnings ~~professional~~from ~~services~~Oncor ~~costs~~Holdings.

Year Ended December 31, ~~2013~~2014 Compared to Year Ended December 31, ~~2012~~2013 — Cash used in operating activities totaled $~~428~~243 million in ~~2013~~2014 and $~~202~~428 million in ~~2012~~2013, respectively. The ~~change~~decrease ~~of $226 million reflected $267 million~~ in ~~higher~~cash ~~interest~~used ~~payments and a decrease~~ of $~~184~~185 million inwas ~~interest~~primarily ~~received~~driven ~~on affiliate debt, partially offset~~ by ~~a decrease of~~ $~~185~~243 million in ~~income~~lower ~~taxes~~cash ~~paid~~interest ~~to EFH Corp. (2012~~ payments ~~included~~due ~~amounts related~~ to ~~prior~~the ~~years)~~discontinuation ~~and~~of ~~$66~~interest ~~million~~paid inon ~~higher~~pre-petition ~~cash~~debt ~~distributions~~(see ~~from Oncor Holdings. See~~ Note 116 to the Financial Statements ~~for discussion of the distribution of EFH Corp. debt as a dividend to EFH Corp.~~), ~~which~~partially ~~has~~offset ~~resulted~~by inhigher ~~interest~~legal ~~received~~and inother ~~2013~~professional ~~being~~services ~~reported as a financing cash flow~~costs.

Amortization of debt issuance costs reported in the condensed statements of consolidated cash flows relates to the debt pushed down from EFH Corp. and the debt issued by EFIH, including EFIH's debtor-in-possession financing. Remaining unamortized costs at the Petition Date were reclassified to liabilities subject to compromise (LSTC) and amortization ceased (see Note 89 to the Financial Statements). All amortized debt issuance costs are reported in interest expense and related charges in the condensed statements of consolidated income (loss).

Financing Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2014 and Year Ended December 31, 2013 — Cash ~~provided~~used byin financing activities totaled $~~1.158~~509 ~~billion~~million in ~~2014~~2015 ~~and~~compared to cash ~~used~~provided inby financing activities ~~totaled~~of $1.158 billion and cash used of $434 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively. ~~Cash~~Activity ~~provided~~in by2015 ~~financing~~reflected ~~activities~~the repayments of principal and fees including a portion of the EFIH Second Lien Notes and charging liens (see Notes 8 and 9 to the Financial Statements). Activity in 2014 ~~included~~reflected $3.564 billion in borrowings ~~under~~from the ~~EFIH~~ DIP Facility, partially offset by $2.312 billion in repayments of EFIH First Lien Notes and $94 million in payments for fees associated with ~~the~~ completion of the ~~EFIH~~ DIP Facility. ~~Cash~~Activity ~~used~~ in ~~financing activities in~~ 2013 reflected a cash distribution to EFH Corp. of $680 million for the purpose of EFH Corp. repaying the balance of the TCEH Demand Notes (see discussion below of investing cash flows), partially offset by $252 million of interest received on holdings of affiliate debt.

Year Ended December 31, 2013 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2012 — Cash used in financing activities totaled $434 million in 2013 compared to cash provided totaling $1.260 billion in 2012, respectively. Activity in 2013 reflected a cash distribution to EFH Corp. of $680 million released from an escrow account for the purpose of EFH Corp. repaying the balance of the TCEH Demand Notes (see discussion below of investing cash flows), partially offset by $252 million of interest received on holdings of affiliate debt. Activity in 2012 reflected the issuances of $2.253 billion of EFIH Notes and distributions of $950 million of the proceeds to EFH Corp. See Note 11 to the Financial Statements for discussion of reclassification of affiliate debt EFIH holds that resulted in interest received on such debt in 2013 being recorded as an increase in membership interests instead of interest income.

Investing Cash Flows

Year Ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2014 and Year Ended December 31, 2013 — There was no cash used in or provided by investing activities in both 2015 and 2014. Cash provided by investing activities in 2013 totaled $680 million and represented a release of funds from a collateral account to pay a distribution to EFH Corp. in January 2013. The funds represented a portion of the net proceeds from the issuance of EFIH Notes in 2012 that were placed in escrow at that time.

~~Year~~Available ~~Ended~~Liquidity ~~December 31, 2013 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2012~~ — ~~Cash~~The ~~provided~~decrease byin ~~investing~~available ~~activities~~liquidity ~~totaled~~of $~~680~~803 million in ~~2013~~the ~~compared~~year toended ~~cash~~December 31, ~~used~~2015 ~~totaling~~was ~~$680~~primarily ~~million~~driven inby ~~2012. The~~the ~~change~~EFIH ~~was~~Second ~~driven~~Lien byNote ~~restricted~~repayment ~~cash~~totaling ~~movements, as~~ $~~680~~750 million ~~was~~(see ~~deposited~~Note in9 ato ~~collateral~~the ~~account~~Financial inStatements). The ~~2012~~decrease ~~for~~also ~~the~~reflected ~~purpose~~$126 million of ~~EFH~~cash ~~Corp.~~used ~~repaying~~to ~~the~~pay ~~balance~~for ofreorganization ~~the~~expense ~~TCEH~~in ~~Demand~~2015, ~~Notes~~partially ~~and~~offset ~~the~~by ~~funds~~$322 ~~were~~million ~~released~~ from the ~~escrow~~distribution ~~account~~of inearnings ~~January~~from ~~2013~~Oncor toHoldings. See ~~make~~discussion ~~the~~of ~~repayment~~cash ~~(see~~flows ~~Note 11 to the Financial Statements)~~above.

30Liquidity After the Bankruptcy Filing — Subject to certain exceptions under the Bankruptcy Code, the Bankruptcy Filing automatically enjoined, or stayed, the continuation of most pending judicial or administrative proceedings and the filing of other actions against the EFIH Debtors or their property to recover on, collect or secure a claim arising prior to the Petition Date (including with respect to EFIH's pre-petition debt instruments).

~~Available~~The ~~Liquidity — In March 2015, with the approval of the~~ Bankruptcy Court, ~~EFIH~~approved ~~used~~final ~~some~~orders ~~of its cash to repay (Repayment) $735 million, including interest at contractual rates,~~ in ~~amounts~~June ~~outstanding~~2014 ~~under~~authorizing ~~EFIH's~~the ~~pre-petition~~DIP ~~11.00%~~Facility ~~Second Lien Notes due 2021~~ (~~11.00%~~see ~~Notes)~~Note ~~and~~8 ~~11.75%~~to ~~Second Lien Notes due 2022 (11.75% Notes) and $15 million in certain fees and expenses of~~ the ~~trustee~~Financial ~~for such notes~~Statements). The ~~Repayment required the requisite consent of the lenders under the EFIH~~ DIP Facility. ~~EFIH~~provides ~~received~~for ~~such~~up ~~consent from approximately 97% of the lenders under the EFIH DIP Facility and paid an aggregate consent fee equal~~ to ~~approximately~~ $~~13 million~~5. As4 abillion ~~result~~in ofsenior ~~the Repayment~~secured, assuper-priority ~~of the date hereof, the principal amount outstanding on the 11~~financing.~~00% Notes and 11.75% are $322 million and $1.388 billion, respectively.~~

~~Liquidity~~EFIH ~~After~~believes ~~the~~that ~~Bankruptcy Filing — Subject to certain exceptions under~~ the ~~Bankruptcy~~DIP ~~Code~~facility, ~~the~~plus ~~Bankruptcy~~cash ~~Filing~~distributions ~~automatically~~received ~~enjoined,~~from orOncor ~~stayed~~Holdings, ~~the~~will ~~continuation~~be ofsufficient ~~most~~to ~~pending~~fund ~~judicial~~its oranticipated ~~administrative~~cash ~~proceedings~~requirements ~~and~~through ~~the~~at ~~filing~~least ofthe ~~other~~maturity ~~actions~~date ~~against~~of the ~~EFIH~~DIP ~~Debtors~~facility. As ora ~~their~~result ~~property~~of tothe ~~recover~~Chapter on11 Cases, ~~collect~~EFIH ordoes ~~secure~~not aexpect ~~claim arising prior~~ to ~~the~~receive ~~date~~further ofinterest ~~the~~payments ~~Bankruptcy~~on ~~Filing~~affiliate ~~(including~~debt ~~with~~securities ~~respect~~it ~~to EFIH's pre-petition debt instruments)~~holds.

~~The~~Debt ~~Bankruptcy~~Capacity ~~Court~~— ~~approved~~The ~~final~~DIP ~~orders~~Facility inpermits, ~~June~~subject ~~2014~~to ~~authorizing~~certain ~~the~~terms, ~~EFIH~~conditions ~~DIP~~and ~~Facility~~limitations, ~~(see~~EFIH ~~Note~~to 6incur toincremental ~~the~~junior ~~Financial~~lien ~~Statements). The~~subordinated ~~EFIH~~debt ~~DIP~~in ~~Facility~~an ~~provides~~aggregate ~~for~~amount upnot to exceed $~~5.4~~3 billion ~~in senior secured, super-priority financing~~.

EFIH believes that the EFIH DIP facility, plus cash distributions received from Oncor Holdings, will be sufficient to fund its anticipated cash requirements through at least the maturity date of the EFIH DIP facility. As a result of the Chapter 11 Cases, EFIH does not expect to receive further interest payments on affiliate debt securities it holds. 28

~~Debt~~Distributions ~~Capacity~~of Earnings from Oncor Holdings and Related Considerations — ~~The~~Oncor Holdings' distributions of earnings to EFIH ~~DIP~~totaled ~~Facility~~$322 ~~permits~~million, ~~subject~~$202 tomillion ~~certain~~and ~~terms~~$213 million for the years ended December 31, ~~conditions~~2015, 2014 and ~~limitations~~2013, respectively. In February 2016, EFIH received a distribution totaling $40 million from Oncor Holdings. See Note 3 to ~~incur~~the ~~incremental~~Financial ~~junior~~Statements ~~lien~~for ~~subordinated~~discussion ~~debt~~of inlimitations anon ~~aggregate~~amounts ~~amount~~Oncor ~~not~~can distribute to ~~exceed~~its ~~$3 billion~~members.

~~Distributions~~Debt ofActivity ~~Earnings~~— ~~from~~Debt ~~Oncor~~activities ~~Holdings~~during —the ~~Oncor~~year ~~Holdings'~~ended ~~distributions~~December 31, of2015 ~~earnings~~are related to ~~EFIH~~repayment ~~totaled~~of ~~$202~~principal ~~million,~~and ~~$213~~interest ~~million~~amounts, and ~~$147~~exclude ~~million~~amounts ~~for~~related ~~the~~to ~~years~~debt ~~ended December 31~~discount, ~~2014,~~financing ~~2013~~ and ~~2012,~~reacquisition ~~respectively~~expenses. OnSettlements ~~February~~in ~~26,~~ 2015, ~~EFIH~~include ~~received~~$445 amillion ~~distribution~~in ~~totaling~~cash payments and $7436 million ~~from~~in ~~Oncor~~charging ~~Holdings. See~~lien ~~Note~~advances, 3both related to ~~the~~pre-petition ~~Financial~~debt ~~Statements~~as ~~for~~approved ~~discussion~~by ofthe ~~limitations~~Bankruptcy onCourt ~~amounts~~(see ~~Oncor~~Note ~~can~~9 ~~distribute~~ to ~~its~~the ~~members~~Financial Statements).

~~Debt~~Income ~~Activity~~Tax Matters — ~~Debt~~ ~~activities~~EFH ~~during~~Corp. ~~the~~and ~~year~~certain ~~ended~~of ~~December 31,~~its ~~2014~~subsidiaries ~~are~~(including ~~principal~~EFCH, ~~amounts~~EFIH, and ~~settlements~~TCEH, ~~exclude~~but ~~amounts~~not ~~related~~including toOncor ~~debt~~Holdings ~~discount,~~and ~~financing~~Oncor) are parties to a Federal and ~~reacquisition~~State ~~expenses. In~~Income ~~June~~Tax ~~2014~~Allocation Agreement, ~~EFIH~~which ~~issued~~provides, aamong ~~$5.4~~other ~~billion~~things, ~~first-lien~~that ~~debtor-~~any corporate member or disregarded entity in~~-possession~~ ~~financing~~the ~~facility~~EFH ~~which~~Corp. ~~was~~group ~~used~~is required to make payments to EFH Corp. in ~~settlements~~an amount calculated to approximate the amount of tax liability such entity would have owed if it filed a separate corporate tax return. The Plan of Reorganization provides that the ~~EFIH~~Debtors ~~First~~will ~~Lien~~reject ~~Notes~~this ~~consisting~~agreement at the effective time of athe $2Plan of Reorganization.~~312~~ Under ~~billion~~the terms of the Settlement Agreement, no further cash ~~exchange~~payments ~~and~~among athe $1Debtors will be made in respect of federal income taxes.~~673~~ However, ~~billion~~solely ~~noncash~~for ~~exchange~~accounting ~~(see~~purposes, ~~Note~~the 6EFH Corp. group continues to allocate federal income taxes among the ~~Financial~~entities ~~Statements)~~that are parties to the Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement. The Settlement Agreement did not alter the allocation and payment for state income taxes, which will continue to be settled.

~~EFIH~~EFH ~~Toggle~~Corp., ~~Notes~~Oncor ~~Interest~~Holdings, ~~Election~~Oncor —and ~~EFIH~~Oncor's ~~made~~third-party ~~its~~minority ~~2013~~investor ~~interest~~are ~~payments~~parties onto ~~the~~a ~~EFIH~~separate ~~Toggle~~Federal ~~Notes~~and byState ~~using~~Income ~~the~~Tax ~~PIK~~Allocation ~~feature~~Agreement, which governs the computation of ~~those~~federal ~~notes. During~~income ~~the~~tax ~~applicable~~liability ~~PIK~~among ~~interest~~such ~~periods~~parties, ~~the~~and ~~interest~~similarly ~~rate~~provides, onamong ~~these~~other ~~notes~~things, isthat ~~increased~~each ~~from~~of ~~11.25%~~Oncor toHoldings 12and Oncor will pay EFH Corp.~~25%. As~~ aits ~~result~~share of ~~the~~an ~~PIK~~amount ~~election,~~calculated ~~EFIH~~to ~~increased~~approximate the ~~aggregate principal~~ amount of ~~the~~tax ~~notes~~liability bysuch ~~$173~~entity ~~million~~would inhave ~~2013~~owed if it filed a separate corporate tax return. ~~See~~The ~~Note~~Settlement 8Agreement tohad no impact on the ~~Financial~~tax ~~Statements~~sharing ~~for~~agreement ~~further~~among ~~discussion~~EFH ofCorp., ~~the~~Oncor ~~EFIH~~Holdings ~~Toggle~~and ~~Notes~~Oncor.

Income Tax Matters — EFH Corp. and certain of its subsidiaries (including EFCH, EFIH, and TCEH, but not including Oncor Holdings and Oncor) are parties to a Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement, which provides, among other things, that any corporate member or disregarded entity in the EFH Corp. group is required to make payments to EFH Corp. in an amount calculated to approximate the amount of tax liability such entity would have owed if it filed a separate corporate tax return. EFH Corp., Oncor Holdings, Oncor and Oncor's third-party minority investor are parties to a separate Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement, which governs the computation of federal income tax liability among such parties, and similarly provides, among other things, that each of Oncor Holdings and Oncor will pay EFH Corp. its share of an amount calculated to approximate the amount of tax liability such entity would have owed if it filed a separate corporate tax return. The material weakness in EFH Corp.'s internal controls over financial reporting related to accounting for deferred income taxes, as described in Item 9A, Controls and Procedures, did not cause any change in its historic tax sharing practices or the interpretation of any tax sharing agreements within the different members of its company.

See Note 12 to the Financial Statements for discussion of income tax payments to and from EFH Corp.

Capitalization — At December 31, 2015, EFIH's capitalization ratios consisted of 138.7% borrowings under debtor-in-possession credit facility (classified as due currently) and pre-petition notes reported as liabilities subject to compromise and (38.7)% membership interests. At December 31, 2014, EFIH's capitalization ratios consisted of 131.1% borrowings under debtor-in-possession credit facility and pre-petition notes reported as liabilities subject to compromise and (31.1)% membership interests.

Capitalization — At December 31, 2014, EFIH's capitalization ratios consisted of 131.1% borrowings under debtor -in-possession credit facilities and pre-petition notes reported as liabilities subject to compromise and (31.1)% membership interests. At December 31, 2013, EFIH's capitalization ratios consisted of 130.1% debt and (30.1)% membership interests.

Financial Covenants — The Bankruptcy Filing constituted an event of default and automatic acceleration under the agreements governing the pre-petition debt of the EFIH Debtors. The creditors are, however, stayed from taking any action against the EFIH Debtors as a result of such defaults and accelerations under the Bankruptcy Code.

The ~~EFIH~~ DIP Facility includes a minimum liquidity covenant pursuant to which EFIH cannot allow unrestricted cash (as defined in the ~~EFIH~~ DIP Facility) to be less than $150 million. EFIH is in compliance with this covenant.

See Note 68 to the Financial Statements for discussion of other covenants related to the DIP Facility.

Material Cross Default/Acceleration Provisions — Certain of EFIH's financing arrangements contain provisions that result in an event of default if there were a failure under other financing arrangements to meet payment terms or to observe other covenants that could or does result in an acceleration of payments due. Such provisions are referred to as "cross default" or "cross acceleration" provisions. The Bankruptcy Filing triggered defaults on EFIH's pre-petition debt obligations, but pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, the creditors are stayed from taking any actions against the Debtors as a result of such defaults.

Contractual Obligations and Commitments — The following table summarizes EFIH's contractual cash obligations at December 31, 2014 (see Note 6 to the Financial Statements for additional disclosures regarding these debt obligations). Pre-petition liabilities subject to compromise (i.e., obligations incurred or accrued prior to the Bankruptcy Filing) are being administered by the Bankruptcy Court and are excluded from the table below due to the uncertainty related to when those obligations will mature.29

Contractual Cash Obligations	Less ThanOne Year		One toThreeYears		Three toFiveYears		MoreThan FiveYears		Total
Debt – principal (a)	$	—	$	5,400	$	—	$	—	$	5,400
Debt – interest	230		107		—		—		337
Total contractual cash obligations	$	230	$	5,507	$	—	$	—	$	5,737

Contractual Obligations and Commitments — The following table summarizes EFIH's contractual cash obligations at December 31, 2015 (see Note 8 to the Financial Statements for additional disclosures regarding these debt obligations). Pre-petition liabilities subject to compromise (i.e., obligations incurred or accrued prior to the Bankruptcy Filing) are being administered by the Bankruptcy Court and are excluded from the table below due to the uncertainty related to when those obligations will mature.



Contractual Cash Obligations	Less Than One Year		One to Three Years		Three to Five Years		More Than Five Years		Total
Debt – principal (a)	$	5,400	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	5,400
Debt – interest	225		—		—		—		225
Total contractual cash obligations	$	5,625	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	5,625

_____________

(a) ~~Includes~~Consists ~~$5.4 billion~~ of borrowings under the ~~EFIH~~ DIP Facility.

Guarantees — See Note 10 to the Financial Statements for discussion of guarantees.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

See Notes 3 and 10 to the Financial Statements regarding VIEs and guarantees, respectively.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

See Note 10 to the Financial Statements for discussion of commitments and contingencies.

CHANGES IN ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

See Note 1 to the Financial Statements for discussion of changes in accounting standards.

3230


Item 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest Rate Risk

Market risk is the risk that in the ordinary course of business that EFIH may experience a loss in value as a result of changes in market conditions that affect economic factors such as interest rates. EFIH's debt at December 31, 2015 and 2014 consists of debtor-in-possession financing. Pre-petition obligations (i.e., obligation incurred or accrued prior to the Bankruptcy Filing) are being administered by the Bankruptcy Court and are excluded from the table below due to the uncertainty related to when those obligations will mature. ~~All of EFIH's debt at December 31, 2013 carried fixed interest rates and exclude the effects of unamortized premiums.~~ See ~~Notes~~Note ~~6 and~~ 8 to the Financial Statements for further discussion of these financial instruments.

	2014Total CarryingAmount			2014Total FairValue		2013Total CarryingAmount			2013Total FairValue
	2015Total CarryingAmount			2015Total FairValue		2014Total CarryingAmount			2014Total FairValue
	(millions of dollars, except percentages)
Debt amounts:
Fixed rate debt amount (a)	$	—		$	—	$	7,739		$	7,849
Borrowings under debtor-in-possession credit facility	$	5,400		$	5,393	$	5,400		$	5,400
Average interest rate (b)	—		%			10.90		%
Average interest rate (a)	4.25		%			4.25		%
Variable rate debt amount	$	5,400		$	5,400	$	—		$	—
Total Debt	$	5,400		$5,393		$5,400			$5,400
Average interest rate (b)	4.25		%
Total Debt	$	5,400		$5,400		$7,739			$7,849

_____________

(a) ~~2013~~The ~~includes~~weighted ~~pushed~~average ~~down~~interest ~~debt.~~rate ~~See~~presented ~~Note~~is 8based toon the ~~Financial~~rate ~~Statements~~in effect at December 31, 2015.

(b) The weighted average interest rate presented is based on the rate in effect at December 31, 2014.

Credit Risk

Oncor's Credit Risk — Credit risk relates to the risk of loss associated with nonperformance by counterparties. Oncor's customers consist primarily of REPs. As a prerequisite for obtaining and maintaining certification, a REP must meet the financial resource standards established by the PUCT. Meeting these standards does not guarantee that a REP will be able to perform its obligations. REP certificates granted by the PUCT are subject to suspension and revocation for significant violation of Texas Public Utility Regulatory Act and PUCT rules. Significant violations include failure to timely remit payments for invoiced charges to a transmission and distribution utility pursuant to the terms of tariffs approved by the PUCT. PUCT rules allow for the recovery of uncollectible amounts from nonaffiliated REPs, reducing the credit risk of such receivables.

At December 31, ~~2014~~2015, Oncor's exposure to credit risk associated with accounts receivable from nonaffiliate customers totaled $~~410~~391 million. The nonaffiliated customer receivable amount is before the allowance for uncollectible accounts, which totaled $3 million at December 31, ~~and~~2015. The nonaffiliate exposure includes trade accounts receivable from REPs totaling $~~298~~290 million, which are almost entirely noninvestment grade. At December 31, ~~2014~~2015, REP subsidiaries of one nonaffiliated entity ~~collectively~~ represented approximately 1213% of the nonaffiliated trade receivable amount. No other nonaffiliated parties represented 10% or more of the total exposure. Oncor views its exposure to this customer to be within an acceptable level of risk tolerance considering PUCT rules and regulations; however, this concentration increases the risk that a default would have a material effect on cash flows.

See Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Significant Activities and Events and Items Influencing Future Performance – Credit Risk Exposure to EFH Corp. and its Subsidiaries above for discussion of Oncor's credit risk to accounts receivable from affiliates.

See Note 12 to the Financial Statements for discussion of transactions between Oncor and TCEH and EFH Corp.

3331

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report and other presentations made by EFIH contain "forward-looking statements." All statements, other than statements of historical facts, that are included in this report, or made in presentations, in response to questions or otherwise, that address activities, events or developments that may occur in the future, including such matters as activities related to EFIH's bankruptcy, financial or operational projections, capital allocation, future capital expenditures, business strategy, competitive strengths, goals, future acquisitions or dispositions, development or operation of facilities, market and industry developments and the growth of EFIH's business and operations (often, but not always, through the use of words or phrases such as "intends," "plans," "will likely," "unlikely," "expected," "anticipated," "estimated," "should," "projection," "target," "goal," "objective" and "outlook"), are forward-looking statements. Although EFIH believes that in making any such forward-looking statement its expectations are based on reasonable assumptions, any such forward-looking statement involves uncertainties and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the discussion of risk factors under Item 1A, Risk Factors and the discussion under Item 7, Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this report and the following important factors, among others, that could cause EFIH's actual results to differ materially from those projected in such forward-looking statements:

• The Debtors (including the EFIH Debtors) ability to ~~develop,~~satisfy ~~file and complete a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization that receives~~ the ~~necessary~~terms ~~votes~~and ~~from~~conditions ~~the~~set ~~required~~forth ~~creditors~~in, and ~~stakeholders~~to ~~and~~receive the ~~approval~~required ~~from~~approvals ~~the~~required ~~Bankruptcy Court~~under, ~~particularly prior to~~ the ~~expiration~~Plan of Reorganization, the ~~exclusivity~~Merger ~~period~~and ~~granted~~Purchase byAgreement and the ~~Bankruptcy~~Plan ~~Court~~Support Agreement;

• the ~~outcome~~breach ofby ~~the~~one ~~court-supervised~~or ~~bid~~more ~~process~~of ~~with~~EFIH's ~~respect~~counterparties tounder the ~~restructuring~~Merger ofand ~~EFH~~Purchase ~~Corp.~~Agreement and/or ~~EFIH~~the Plan Support Agreement;

• ~~EFIH's~~the ~~ability~~effectiveness toof ~~obtain~~the ~~Bankruptcy~~overall ~~Court~~restructuring ~~approval~~activities ~~with~~pursuant ~~respect~~ to the ~~EFIH Debtors' motions in the~~ Chapter 11 Cases, including ~~such~~the ~~approvals~~Plan ~~not~~of ~~being~~Reorganization, ~~overturned~~and onany ~~appeal~~additional orstrategies ~~being~~EFIH ~~stayed~~employs ~~for~~to ~~any~~address ~~extended~~its ~~period~~liquidity ofand ~~time~~capital resources;

• ~~the~~EFIH's ~~terms~~ability ~~and~~to ~~conditions~~remain ofin ~~any~~compliance ~~Chapter~~with 11the ~~plan~~requirements of ~~reorganization that is ultimately approved by~~ the ~~Bankruptcy~~DIP ~~Court~~Facility;

• EFIH's ability to remain in compliance with the requirements of the EFIH DIP Facility;


•	EFIH's ability to maintain or obtain sufficient financing sources for EFIH's cash requirements during the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases and its ability to obtain sufficient exit financing to fund any Chapter 11 plan of reorganization;


•	the actions and decisions of creditors, regulators and other third parties that have an interest in the Chapter 11 Cases or reorganization that may be inconsistent with, or interfere with, EFIH's plans;

• the duration and related costs of the Chapter 11 Cases;

• the actions and decisions of regulatory authorities relative to ~~any~~the ~~Chapter~~Plan ~~11 plan~~ of ~~reorganization~~Reorganization;

• restrictions on EFIH's activities due to the terms of its debt agreements, including the ~~EFIH~~ DIP Facility, and restrictions imposed by the Bankruptcy Court;


•	EFIH's ability to obtain any required regulatory consent necessary to implement any Chapter 11 plan of reorganization;

• the outcome of current or potential litigation regarding whether holders are entitled to make-whole premiums and/or post-petition interest in connection with the treatment of their claims in bankruptcy;

• the outcome of current or potential litigations regarding intercompany claims and/or derivative claims;


•	prevailing governmental policies and regulatory actions, including those of the Texas Legislature, the Governor of Texas, the US Congress, the FERC, the NERC, the TRE, the PUCT, the EPA and the TCEQ, with respect to, among other things:


◦	allowed rates of return;


◦	permitted capital structure;


◦	industry, market and rate structure;


◦	recovery of investments;


◦	acquisition and disposal of assets and facilities;


◦	development, construction and operation of facilities;


◦	changes in tax laws and policies, and


◦	changes in and compliance with environmental and safety laws and policies;


•	legal and administrative proceedings and settlements, including the legal proceedings arising out of the Chapter 11 Cases;


•	general industry trends;


•	economic conditions, including the impact of an economic downturn;


•	weather conditions, including drought and limitations on access to water, and other natural phenomena, and acts of sabotage, wars or terrorist or cyber security threats or activities;


•	population growth or decline, or changes in market supply or demand and demographic patterns, particularly in ERCOT;

• changes in business strategy, development plans or vendor relationships;


•	changes in interest rates or rates of inflation;


•	changes in operating expenses, liquidity needs and capital expenditures;


•	commercial bank market and capital market conditions and the potential impact of disruptions in US and international credit markets;


•	the amount and timing of dividends received from Oncor;


•	access to capital, the cost of such capital, and the results of financing and refinancing efforts, including availability of funds in capital markets;


•	EFIH's ability to obtain and maintain sufficient cash flow to make interest payments, and EFIH's ability to refinance its debt instruments, including the EFIH DIP Facility;


•	changes in technology used by and services offered by EFIH and/or its subsidiaries;


•	significant changes in the relationship of EFIH with their employees, including the availability of qualified personnel, and the potential adverse effects if labor disputes or grievances were to occur;


•	changes in assumptions used to estimate costs of providing employee benefits, including medical and dental benefits, pension and OPEB, and future funding requirements related thereto, including joint and several liability exposure under ERISA;

• ~~changes~~hazards incustomary ~~assumptions~~to ~~used~~the industry and the possibility that EFIH may not have adequate insurance to ~~estimate~~cover ~~future~~losses ~~executive~~resulting ~~compensation~~from ~~payments~~such hazards; and

• hazards customary to the industry and the possibility that EFIH may not have adequate insurance to cover losses resulting from such hazards;

• significant changes in critical accounting policies, and


•	actions by credit rating agencies.

Any forward-looking statement speaks only at the date on which it is made, and except as may be required by law, EFIH undertakes no obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which it is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or circumstances. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for EFIH to predict all of them; nor can EFIH assess the impact of each such factor or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. As such, you should not unduly rely on such forward-looking statements.

INDUSTRY AND MARKET INFORMATION

The industry and market data and other statistical information used throughout this report are based on independent industry publications, government publications, reports by market research firms or other published independent sources, including certain data published by ERCOT, the PUCT and NYMEX. EFIH did not commission any of these publications or reports. Some data is also based on good faith estimates, which are derived from EFIH's review of internal surveys, as well as the independent sources listed above. Independent industry publications and surveys generally state that they have obtained information from sources believed to be reliable, but do not guarantee the accuracy and completeness of such information. While EFIH believes that each of these studies and publications is reliable, it has not independently verified such data and make no representation as to the accuracy of such information. Forecasts are particularly likely to be inaccurate, especially over long periods of time, and EFIH does not know what assumptions regarding general economic growth are used in preparing the forecasts included in this report. Similarly, while EFIH believes that such internal and external research is reliable, it has not been verified by any independent sources, and EFIH makes no assurances that the predictions contained therein are accurate.

3533


Item 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Managers and Member of Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC (Debtor-in-Possession)

Dallas, Texas

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC (a direct subsidiary of Energy Future Holdings Corp. ("EFH Corp.")) and subsidiaries (Debtor-in-Possession) (“EFIH”) as of December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, and the related statements of consolidated income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), cash flows and membership interests for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015. These financial statements are the responsibility of EFIH's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC and subsidiaries (Debtor-in-Possession) as of December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, on April 29, 2014, Energy Future Holdings Corp. and the substantial majority of its direct and indirect subsidiaries (including Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC), excluding Oncor Electric Delivery Holdings Company LLC and its subsidiaries, filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not purport to reflect or provide for the consequences of the bankruptcy proceedings. In particular, such financial statements do not purport to show (1) as to assets, their realizable value on a liquidation basis or their availability to satisfy liabilities; (2) as to prepetition liabilities, the amounts that may be allowed for claims or contingencies, or the status and priority thereof; (3) as to membership interest accounts, the effect of any changes that may be made in the capitalization of EFIH; or (4) as to operations, the effect of any changes that may be made in its business.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 have been prepared assuming that EFIH will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, EFIH’s ability to continue as a going concern is contingent upon its ability to comply with the financial and other covenants contained in the DIP ~~Facilities~~Facility described in Note 68, its ability to obtain new debtor in possession financing in the event the DIP ~~Facilities~~Facility ~~were~~was to expire during the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases, its ability to complete a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization in a timely manner, including obtaining ~~creditor and Bankruptcy Court approval of such plan as well as~~ applicable regulatory approvals required for such plan, and its ability to obtain any exit financing needed to implement such plan, among other factors. These circumstances and uncertainties inherent in the bankruptcy proceedings raise substantial doubt about EFIH’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning these matters are also discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements do not include adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), EFIH's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2014~~2015, based on the criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated ~~March~~February 3129, ~~2015~~2016 expressed an ~~adverse~~unqualified opinion on EFIH's internal control over financial reporting ~~because of a material weakness~~.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Dallas, Texas

~~March~~February 3129, ~~2015~~2016

3634

ENERGY FUTURE INTERMEDIATE HOLDING COMPANY LLC, A DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED INCOME (LOSS)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2014			2013			2012
	2015			2014			2013
	(millions of dollars)
Selling, general and administrative expenses	$	(226	)	$	(2022	)	$	—(20	)
Other deductions — (Note 5)	(128		)	(110		)	—
Other deductions — (Note 4)	(173		)	(128		)	(110		)
Interest income — affiliates (Note 13)	—			~~284~~—			~~598~~284
Interest expense and related charges (Note 9)	(441		)	(760		)	(526		)
Interest expense and related charges (Note 6)	(469		)	(441		)	(760		)
Reorganization items (Note 7)	(~~267~~73		)	—(267		)	—
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary	(~~858~~721		)	(~~606~~858		)	72(606		)
Income tax benefit (expense) (Note 4)	155			169			(27		)
Income tax benefit (expense) (Note 5)	88			155			169
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary (net of tax) (Note 3)	~~349~~334			~~335~~349			~~270~~335
Net income (loss)	$	(~~354~~299	)	$	(~~102~~354	)	$	~~315~~(102	)

See Notes to the Financial Statements.

STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

	Year Ended December 31,
	2014			2013			2012
	2015			2014			2013
	(millions of dollars)
Net income (loss)	$	(~~354~~299	)	$	(~~102~~354	)	$	~~315~~(102	)
Other comprehensive income (loss) — net of tax effects:
Reclassification to interest income of mark-to-market valuations of holdings of affiliate debt (net of tax expense of $—, $99 and $—) (Note 11)	—			(185		)	—
Reclassification to interest income of mark-to-market valuations of holdings of affiliate debt (net of tax expense of $—, $— and $99) (Note 11)	—			—			(185		)
Mark-to-market valuations of holdings of affiliate debt held as available for sale (net of tax expense of $—, $—, and $78) (Note 11)	—			—			145
Net effects related to Oncor — reported in equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries (net of tax)	(5		)	(47		)	(14		)
Net effects related to Oncor (net of tax benefit (expense) of $(25), $(8) and $1)	(47		)	(14		)	2
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	(5		)	(47		)	(199		)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)	(47		)	(199		)	147
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(304	)	$	(401	)	$	(301	)
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	(401	)	$	(301	)	$	462

See Notes to the Financial Statements.

3735

ENERGY FUTURE INTERMEDIATE HOLDING COMPANY LLC, A DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS

	Year Ended December 31,
	2014			2013			2012
	2015			2014			2013
	(millions of dollars)
Cash flows — operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	(~~354~~299	)	$	(~~102~~354	)	$	~~315~~(102	)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to cash used in operating activities:
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiary	(~~349~~334		)	(~~335~~349		)	(~~270~~335		)
Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated subsidiary	202			213			147
Distributions of earnings from unconsolidated subsidiary (Note 3)	322			202			213
Deferred income taxes, net	~~(51~~—		)	(5551		)	(255		)
Fees paid for EFIH DIP Facility (Notes 6 and 7) (reported as financing activities)	94			—			—
Adjustments for allowed claims related to LSTC	(96		)	—			—
PIK interest income on EFH Corp. Toggle Notes held as investment (Note 13)	—			—			(288		)
Fees paid on EFIH Second Lien Notes repayment and the DIP Facility (Notes 6 and 7) (reported as financing activities)	28			94			—
Interest expense related to pushed-down debt of parent (Notes 8 and 9)	1			6			75
Interest expense on toggle notes payable in additional principal (Notes 6 and 9)	—			65			176
Interest expense on toggle notes payable in additional principal (Notes 8 and 9)	65			176			12
Reserve recorded for income tax receivable from EFH Corp. (Note 4)	173			125			110
Noncash impairment of investment in affiliate debt (Note 13)	—			—			14
Loss on exchange and settlement of EFIH First Lien Notes (Notes 7 and 9)	—			108			—
Reserve recorded for income tax receivable from EFH Corp. (Note 5)	125			110			—
Amortization of debt related balances (Note 6)	—			(17		)	(52		)
Loss on exchange and settlement of EFIH First Lien Notes (Note 6)	108			—			—
Mark-to-market gain reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (Note 11)	—			—			(284		)
Accretion of purchase discount on investment in affiliate debt (Note 13)	—			—			(92		)
Other, net	5			4			6
Amortization of debt related balances (Note 9)	(17		)	(52		)	5
Mark-to-market gain reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (Note 11)	—			(284		)	—
Other, net	3			—			—
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Income taxes receivable from/payable to EFH Corp. (Note 12)	—			1			(120		)
Pre-petition interest related to debt repayments (Notes 8 and 9 )	(57		)	(128		)	—
Assets	(2—		)	(52		)	(24		)
Accrued interest	16—			2144			332
Other liabilities (primarily accrued taxes)	(8436		)	(~~103~~84		)	(29103		)
Cash used in operating activities	(~~243~~294		)	(~~428~~243		)	(~~202~~428		)
Cash flows — financing activities:
Proceeds from EFIH DIP Facility before fees paid (Notes 6 and 7)	3,564			—			—
Proceeds from the DIP Facility before fees paid (Note 8)	—			3,564			—
Fees paid for EFIH DIP Facility (Note 6)	(94		)	—			—
Fees paid on EFIH Second Lien Notes repayment and the DIP Facility (Note 7)	(28		)	(94		)	—
Repayments/repurchases of debt (Note 6)	(2,312		)	—			—
Repayments/repurchases of debt (Note 8 and 9)	(481		)	(2,312		)	—
Issuances of debt	—			—			2,253
Interest received on holdings of affiliate debt (Note 11)	—			—			252
Interest received on holdings of affiliate debt (Note 11)	—			252			—
Distributions to EFH Corp. (Note 11)	—			—			(680		)
Distributions to EFH Corp. (Note 11)	—			(680		)	(950		)
Other, net	—			—			(6		)
Debt exchange and issuance costs, premiums and discounts	—			(6		)	(43		)
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities	(509		)	1,158			(434		)
Cash provided by (used in) financing activities	1,158			(434		)	1,260
Cash flows — investing activities:
Restricted cash related to debt issuance (Note 11)	—			~~680~~—			(680		)
Purchase of make-whole agreements between affiliate and unconsolidated subsidiary (Note 12)	—			—			(159		)
Cash provided by investing activities	—			—			680
Sale of make-whole agreements between affiliate and unconsolidated subsidiary (Note 12)	—			—			159
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	(803		)	915			(182		)
Cash provided by (used in) investing activities	—			680			(680		)
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning balance	1,157			242			424
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	915			(182		)	378
Cash and cash equivalents — ending balance	$	354		$	1,157		$	242
Cash and cash equivalents — beginning balance	242			424			46
Cash and cash equivalents — ending balance	$	1,157		$	242		$	424

See Notes to the Financial Statements.

3836

ENERGY FUTURE INTERMEDIATE HOLDING COMPANY LLC, A DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	December 31,
	2014			2013
	2015			2014
ASSETS	(millions of dollars)
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~1,157~~354		$	~~242~~1,157
Other current assets	3			2
Receivables from affiliates	2			—
Total current assets	1,160			244
Other current assets	1			3
Investment in Oncor Holdings (Note 3)	6,050			5,950
Total current assets	357			1,160
Accumulated deferred income taxes	26			—
Investment in Oncor Holdings (Note 3)	6,059			6,050
Other noncurrent assets	—			58
Accumulated deferred income taxes (Note 5)	—			26
Total assets	$	76,~~236~~416		$	67,~~252~~236
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERSHIP INTERESTS
Current liabilities:
Trade accounts and other payables to affiliates	$	6		$	10
Borrowings under debtor-in-possession credit facility (Note 8)	$	5,400		$	—
Notes, loans and other debt (Note 8)	—			7,877
Trade accounts and other payables to affiliates	5			6
Accumulated deferred income taxes (Note 4)	26			26
Accumulated deferred income taxes (Note 5)	—			26
Accrued interest	1			137
Income taxes payable to EFH Corp. (Note 10)	1			—
Other current liabilities	18			—
Accrued interest	1			1
Total current liabilities	51			8,050
Other current liabilities	73			18
Borrowings under debtor-in-possession credit facilities (Note 6)	5,400			—
Total current liabilities	5,480			51
Liabilities subject to compromise (Note 8)	3,988			—
Borrowings under debtor-in-possession credit facility (Note 8)	—			5,400
Accumulated deferred income taxes	—			24
Liabilities subject to compromise (Note 9)	3,354			3,988
Total liabilities	98,~~439~~834			89,~~074~~439
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 10)
Membership interests (Note 11):
Capital account	(12,~~482~~327		)	(1,~~148~~482		)
Affiliate debt held by EFIH	(635		)	(635		)
Affiliate debt held by EFIH (Note 11)	—			(635		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	(8691		)	(3986		)
Total membership interests	(2,~~203~~418		)	(12,~~822~~203		)
Total liabilities and membership interests	$	76,~~236~~416		$	67,~~252~~236

See Notes to the Financial Statements.

3937

ENERGY FUTURE INTERMEDIATE HOLDING COMPANY LLC, A DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

STATEMENTS OF CONSOLIDATED MEMBERSHIP INTERESTS

	Year Ended December 31,
	2014			2013			2012
	2015			2014			2013
	(millions of dollars)
Capital account:
Balance at beginning of period	$	(1,~~148~~482	)	$	5(1,~~049~~148	)	$	5,~~790~~049
Net income (loss)	(~~354~~299		)	(~~102~~354		)	~~315~~(102		)
Cash distributions to EFH Corp. (Note 11)	—			(680		)	(950		)
Settlement of affiliate debt held by EFIH (Note11)	(635		)	—			—
Distribution to EFH Corp. of debt held as investment (Note 11)	—			(5,778		)	(160		)
Cash distributions to EFH Corp. (Note 11)	—			—			(680		)
Income tax on interest received on holdings of affiliate debt (b)	—			(88		)	—
Distribution to EFH Corp. of debt held as investment (Note 11)	—			—			(5,778		)
Deferred gain on debt exchanges, net of deferred tax asset (Note 8)	—			—			(253		)
Income tax on interest received on holdings of affiliate debt	—			—			(88		)
Effect of debt push-down from EFH Corp. (a)	21			438			308
Effect of debt push-down from EFH Corp.	85			21			438
Other	(1		)	13			(1		)
Income tax adjustment related to AMT utilization	3			—			—
Balance at end of period	(1,482		)	(1,148		)	5,049
Other	1			(1		)	13
Balance at end of period	(2,327		)	(1,482		)	(1,148		)
Affiliate debt held by EFIH:
Balance at beginning of period	(635		)	(~~5,388~~635		)	—(5,388		)
Reclassification of investments in debt securities of affiliates (Note 11)	—			—			(5,388		)
Settlement of affiliate debt held by EFIH (Note 11)	635			—			—
EFH Corp. debt distributed to EFH Corp. ($5.125 billion principal amount)	—			~~4,524~~—			—4,524
Net affiliate debt received in debt exchanges ($31 million principal amount)	—			~~(23~~—		)	—(23		)
Interest received on holdings of affiliate debt (b)	—			252			—
Interest received on holdings of affiliate debt	—			—			252
Balance at end of period	~~(635~~—		)	(635		)	(~~5,388~~635		)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax effects:
Balance at beginning of period	(3986		)	~~160~~(39		)	15160
Recognition in interest income of mark-to-market valuations of investments in affiliate debt upon distribution to EFH Corp. (c)	—			(185		)	—
Recognition in interest income of mark-to-market valuations of investments in affiliate debt upon distribution to EFH Corp.	—			—			(185		)
Changes in fair values of investments in debt securities of affiliates	—			—			145
Unrecognized gains (losses) related to pension and other retirement benefit plans assumed by Oncor	(6		)	(49		)	(16		)
Unrecognized gains (losses) related to pension and other retirement benefit plans assumed by Oncor	(49		)	(16		)	(2		)
Net effects related to Oncor	1			2			2
Net effects related to Oncor	2			2			2
Balance at end of period	(91		)	(86		)	(39		)
Balance at end of period	(86		)	(39		)	160
Total membership interests at end of period	$	(2,418	)	$	(2,203	)	$	(1,822	)
Total membership interests at end of period	$	(2,203	)	$	(1,822	)	$	(179	)

_____________

(a) Represents the effect of a net reduction of $420 million and $259 million in 2013 and 2012, respectively, of debt pushed down from EFH Corp. (Note 8) and related interest and income tax effects.

(b) Includes $244 million related to EFH Corp. debt held and $8 million related to TCEH debt held. Income tax effect of $88 million on cash interest received reported as a capital transaction.

See Notes to the Financial Statements.

4038

ENERGY FUTURE INTERMEDIATE HOLDING COMPANY LLC, A DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


1.	BUSINESS AND SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Description of Business

References in this report to "the ~~company~~Company" are to EFIH and/or its direct and indirect subsidiaries as apparent in the context. See Glossary for defined terms.

EFIH, a direct, wholly owned subsidiary of EFH Corp., is a Dallas, Texas-based holding company with no operations or operating assets whose wholly owned subsidiary, Oncor Holdings, holds a majority interest (approximately 80%) in Oncor. Oncor is a regulated electricity transmission and distribution company principally engaged in providing delivery services to REPs, including subsidiaries of TCEH, that sell electricity to residential, business and other consumers in Texas. EFIH has no reportable business segments. Oncor Holdings and its subsidiaries (the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities) are not consolidated in EFIH's financial statements in accordance with consolidation accounting standards related to variable interest entities (VIEs) (see Note 3).

Various ring-fencing measures have been taken to enhance the credit quality of Oncor Holdings and Oncor. These measures serve to mitigate Oncor's and Oncor Holdings' credit exposure to the Texas Holdings Group, which includes EFIH, and to reduce the risk that the assets and liabilities of the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities would be substantively consolidated with the assets and liabilities of the Texas Holdings Group in the event of a bankruptcy of one or more of Texas Holding Group's subsidiaries. Such measures include, among other things: Oncor's sale of a 19.75% equity interest to Texas Transmission in November 2008; maintenance of separate books and records for the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities; the board of directors of Oncor Holdings and Oncor being comprised of a majority of independent directors, and prohibitions on the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities providing credit support to, or receiving credit support from, any member of the Texas Holdings Group. The assets and liabilities of the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities are separate and distinct from those of the Texas Holdings Group, including TXU Energy and Luminant, and none of the assets of the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities are available to satisfy the debt or contractual obligations of any member of the Texas Holdings Group. Oncor and Oncor Holdings do not bear any liability for debt or contractual obligations of the Texas Holdings Group (including, but not limited to, EFIH's debt obligations), and vice versa. Accordingly, Oncor Holdings' operations are conducted, and its cash flows managed, independently from the Texas Holdings Group.

~~Bankruptcy~~Chapter ~~Filing~~11 Cases

AsOn ~~discussed further in Note 2, on~~ April 29, 2014 (the Petition Date), EFH Corp. and the substantial majority of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including EFIH, EFCH and TCEH but excluding the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities, (collectively, the Debtors), filed voluntary petitions for relief (the Bankruptcy Filing) under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code (the Bankruptcy Code) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (the Bankruptcy Court). ~~See~~In ~~Note~~September 62015, ~~for~~the ~~discussion~~Debtors filed the Fifth Plan of Reorganization (which was amended by the ~~DIP~~Sixth ~~Facilities~~Plan of Reorganization in November 2015) and the Disclosure Statement. The Disclosure Statement was approved by the Bankruptcy Court in September 2015.

Following the approval of the Disclosure Statement by the Bankruptcy Court, the Debtors solicited the vote of their required creditors for approval of the Plan of Reorganization. In October 2015, the required creditors voted to approve the Plan of Reorganization. The Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Plan of Reorganization in December 2015. See Note 2 for further discussion regarding the Chapter 11 Cases, the Plan of Reorganization and the Disclosure Statement.

Basis of Presentation, Including Application of Bankruptcy Accounting

The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared as if EFIH is a going concern and contemplate the realization of assets and liabilities in the normal course of business. The consolidated financial statements reflect the application of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 852, Reorganizations. During the pendency of the ~~Bankruptcy~~Chapter ~~Filing~~11 Cases, the Debtors will operate their businesses as debtors-in-possession under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code. ASC 852 applies to entities that have filed a petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. The guidance requires that transactions and events directly associated with the reorganization be distinguished from the ongoing operations of the business. In addition, the guidance provides for changes in the accounting and presentation of liabilities. See Notes 7 and 89 for discussion of these accounting and reporting changes.

~~EFIH's~~Investments ~~investment~~ in ~~Oncor~~unconsolidated ~~Holdings~~subsidiaries, ~~does~~which are 50% or less owned and/or do not meet accounting standards criteria for consolidation, ~~and~~are is accounted for under the equity method (see Note 3). All intercompany items and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. All dollar amounts in the financial statements and tables in the notes are stated in millions of US dollars unless otherwise indicated.

Use of Estimates

Preparation of financial statements requires estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the reporting of assets and liabilities at the balance sheet dates and the reported amounts of income and expense, including fair value measurements and estimates of expected allowed claims. In the event estimates and/or assumptions prove to be different from actual amounts, adjustments are made in subsequent periods to reflect more current information.

Income Taxes

EFH Corp. files a consolidated US federal income tax return that includes the results of EFCH, EFIH, Oncor Holdings and TCEH. Oncor is a partnership for US federal income tax purposes and is not a corporate member of the EFH Corp. consolidated group. Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities as required under accounting rules. See Note 45.

Investment in Affiliate Debt

~~Investments~~The inamounts ~~affiliate debt were classified as a reduction~~ of ~~membership interests effective December 31, 2012 (see Note 11). Prior to December 2012, investments in~~ affiliate debt ~~were~~held ~~classified~~by asEFIH ~~available-for-sale~~were ~~securities~~eliminated as ~~assets~~a inresult of the ~~balance~~Settlement ~~sheet~~Agreement ~~and~~approved ~~were~~by ~~recorded~~the atBankruptcy ~~fair~~Court ~~value with unrealized gains or losses recorded~~ in ~~other~~December ~~comprehensive income~~2015. ~~EFIH~~Investments ~~evaluated its investment~~ in affiliate debt ~~for impairment and recorded an impairment loss if declines in fair value~~ were ~~deemed~~classified ~~to be other than temporary, which occurred if it determined it would be unable to recover the carrying value of the investment. Impairments were accounted for~~ as a reduction of ~~interest~~membership ~~income~~interests ifeffective ~~related~~December ~~to the issuer's credit. If they were not related to the issuer's credit~~31, ~~the~~2012 ~~impairments~~(see ~~were~~Note ~~recorded in other comprehensive income~~11).

Impairment of Equity Method Investments

EFIH evaluates its investment in Oncor Holdings when factors indicate that a decrease in the value of the investment has occurred that is not temporary. Indications of a loss in value include recurring operating losses of the investee or fair value measures that are less than carrying value. An impairment loss is recognized if the carrying value of the investment is greater than the fair value of the investment, and the loss is not deemed temporary. Fair value is determined primarily by discounted cash flows, supported by available market valuations, if applicable.

Push-Down of EFH Corp. Debt

In accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) Topic 5-J, EFIH reflects amounts of certain EFH Corp. 10.875% Notes and EFH Corp. Toggle Notes on its consolidating balance sheet and the related interest expense in its ~~income~~statements ~~statement~~of consolidated income/(loss). The amounts reflected on EFIH's balance sheet were calculated based upon the relative equity investment of EFCH and EFIH in their respective operating subsidiaries at the time of the Merger (see Note 89).

Changes in Accounting Standards

In April 2014, the FASB issued ~~ASU~~Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-08 (ASU 2014-08), Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity, which changes the requirements for reporting discontinued operations. The ASU states that a disposal of a component of an entity or a group of components of an entity is required to be reported in discontinued operations if the disposal represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on an entity's operations and financial results when the component of an entity or group of components of an entity meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale, is disposed of by sale, or is disposed of other than by sale. The amendments in this ASU also require additional disclosures about discontinued operations. ASU 2014-08 iswas effective for the Company for the first quarter of 2015. This new requirement is relevant to ~~our~~EFIH's presentation of the equity method investment in Oncor~~, which has been proposed for sale within the Chapter 11 Cases~~. The new guidance ~~will~~eliminated ~~eliminate~~ a scope exception ~~currently~~previously applicable to equity method investments, resulting in the requirement of further analysis of the presentation of the Oncor equity method investment ~~within the consolidated financial statements in 2015~~. ~~EFIH~~Based ~~does~~on ~~not~~EFIH's ~~currently~~analysis, ~~expect~~ ASU 2014-08 towill not materially affect its results of operations, financial position, or cash flows, ~~until~~unless a ~~plan of~~ sale of ~~the~~its Oncor investment is approved by each of the Bankruptcy Court and all of the other regulatory entities with approval authority (see Note 2), at which time presentation as a discontinued operations may be appropriate.

42In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-03 (ASU 2015-03), Simplifying Balance Sheet Presentation by Presenting Debt Issuance Costs as a Deduction from Recognized Debt Liability. The ASU is effective for annual reporting periods, including interim reporting periods, beginning after December 15, 2015. The new standard requires debt issuance costs to be classified as reductions to the face value of the related debt. EFIH does not expect ASU 2015-03 to materially affect its financial position until it issues new debt. In August 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2015-15 (ASU 2015-15), Interest-Imputation of Interest (Topic 835-30) Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line of Credit Arrangements. ASU 2015-15 provides guidance on the presentation of debt issuance costs associated with line-of-credit arrangements and allows an entity to defer and present debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortize the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of the line-of-credit.

In ~~August~~November ~~2014~~2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ~~No. 2014~~2015-1517 (ASU ~~2014~~2015-1517), ~~Presentation~~Balance ofSheet ~~Financial~~Classification ~~Statements~~of –Deferred ~~Going Concern~~Taxes. The ASU ~~2014-15~~simplifies isthe ~~effective~~presentation ~~for~~of ~~annual~~deferred ~~reporting~~income ~~periods~~taxes ~~(including~~by ~~interim~~requiring ~~periods~~that ~~within~~deferred ~~those~~tax ~~periods)~~assets ~~ending~~and ~~after~~liabilities ~~December~~be ~~15,~~classified ~~2016. Early~~as ~~application~~noncurrent ~~is permitted. The amendments~~ in ~~ASU 2014-15 create~~ a ~~new~~statement ~~ASC Sub-topic 205-40, Presentation~~ of ~~Financial~~financial ~~Statements~~position. EFIH –early ~~Going~~adopted ~~Concern~~ASU ~~and~~2015-17 ~~requires~~effective ~~management~~December to31, ~~assess~~2015 ~~for~~on ~~each~~a ~~annual~~prospective ~~and~~basis. Adoption ~~interim~~of ~~reporting~~this ~~period~~ASU ifresulted ~~conditions~~in ~~exist that raise substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as~~ a ~~going~~reclassification ~~concern. The~~of ~~rule~~its ~~requires~~net ~~various~~current ~~disclosures~~deferred ~~depending~~tax onasset ~~the facts~~ and ~~circumstances~~liability ~~surrounding~~to anthe ~~entity's~~net ~~ability~~noncurrent todeferred ~~continue~~tax asasset aand ~~going~~liability ~~concern. EFIH is~~ in ~~the~~its ~~process~~consolidated ofbalance ~~assessing~~sheet ~~the~~as ~~effects~~ of ~~the~~December ~~application~~31, of2015. No ~~the~~prior ~~new~~periods ~~guidance~~were onretrospectively ~~its financial statement disclosures~~adjusted.


2.	CHAPTER 11 CASES

On the Petition Date, EFH Corp. and the substantial majority of its direct and indirect subsidiaries, including EFIH, EFCH and TCEH but excluding the Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities, filed voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. During the pendency of the ~~Bankruptcy Filing (the~~ Chapter 11 Cases), the Debtors will operate their businesses as "debtors-in-possession" under the jurisdiction of the Bankruptcy Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code.

The Bankruptcy Filing resulted primarily from the adverse effects on EFH Corp.'s competitive businesses of lower wholesale electricity prices in ERCOT driven by the sustained decline in natural gas prices since mid-2008. Further, the natural gas hedges that TCEH entered into when forward market prices of natural gas were significantly higher than current prices had largely matured before the remaining positions were terminated shortly after the Bankruptcy Filing. These market conditions challenged the profitability and operating cash flows of EFH Corp.'s competitive businesses and resulted in the inability to support their significant interest payments and debt maturities, including the remaining debt obligations due in 2014, and the inability to refinance and/or extend the maturities of their outstanding debt.

After a series of discussions with certain creditors that began in 2013 and in anticipation of the Bankruptcy Filing, on April 29, 2014, the Debtors entered into a Restructuring Support and Lock-Up Agreement (RSA) with various stakeholders (Consenting Parties) in order to effect an agreed upon restructuring of the Debtors through a pre-arranged Chapter 11 plan of reorganization.41

~~Upon~~Plan ~~receiving competing bids for the sale~~ of ~~EFH Corp.'s indirect economic ownership interest in Oncor, which offered new alternatives to maximize the value of the Debtors' estates, the Debtors terminated the RSA effective July 31, 2014.~~Reorganization

InA ~~cooperation~~Chapter ~~with~~11 ~~various~~plan ~~stakeholders~~of reorganization, ~~the~~among ~~Debtors~~other ~~are~~things, ~~focused~~determines onthe ~~formulating~~rights and ~~implementing~~satisfaction anof ~~effective~~claims of various creditors and ~~efficient~~security ~~plan~~holders of ~~reorganization~~an ~~for~~entity ~~each~~operating under the protection of the Bankruptcy Court. In order for the Debtors ~~under~~to ~~Chapter~~emerge 11successfully offrom the ~~Bankruptcy~~Chapter ~~Code~~11 ~~that~~Cases ~~maximizes~~as ~~enterprise~~reorganized ~~value. The~~companies, ~~Debtors~~they ~~currently~~must ~~have~~obtain approval from the ~~exclusive~~Bankruptcy ~~right~~Court toand ~~file~~certain of their respective creditors for a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization. In ~~until~~September ~~June 23~~2015, ~~2015~~the ~~and~~Debtors filed the ~~exclusive~~Plan ~~right~~of toReorganization ~~solicit~~and the ~~appropriate~~Disclosure ~~votes~~Statement. The ~~for~~Disclosure ~~any~~Statement ~~such~~was ~~plan~~approved itby ~~files~~the ~~prior~~Bankruptcy toCourt ~~such~~in ~~date~~September ~~until~~2015. In ~~August~~October 232015, ~~2015~~the ~~(i.e.,~~Debtors filed the ~~exclusivity~~Plan ~~period)~~Supplement. ~~Upon~~ ~~expiration~~In ofOctober ~~this~~2015, ~~exclusivity~~the ~~period~~Plan ~~(unless~~of ~~extended~~Reorganization was approved by the ~~Bankruptcy~~required ~~Court)~~creditors, ~~any~~and ~~creditor~~in orDecember ~~stakeholder~~2015, ~~has~~ the ~~ability~~Plan toof ~~file~~Reorganization ~~one~~was orconfirmed ~~more~~by ~~Chapter~~the 11Bankruptcy ~~plans of reorganization~~Court.

~~Proposed~~In ~~Sale~~general, the Plan of Reorganization contemplates a structure that involves a tax-free deconsolidation or tax-free spin-off of TCEH from EFH Corp.'s ~~Indirect~~(Reorganized ~~Economic~~TCEH ~~Ownership~~Spin-Off), ~~Interest~~immediately infollowed ~~Oncor~~by the acquisition of reorganized EFH Corp. financed by existing TCEH creditors and third-party investors. Pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization and subject to certain conditions and required regulatory approvals, among other things:

In• ~~September~~TCEH ~~2014,~~will ~~with~~execute ~~input and support from several key stakeholders, the Debtors filed~~ a ~~motion~~transaction with the Bankruptcy Court seeking the entry of an order approving bidding procedures with respect to the potential sale of EFH Corp.'s indirect economic ownership interest in Oncor. During October 2014, the bankruptcy court held hearings regarding the motion. In November 2014, the Bankruptcy Court conditionally approved the motion. In January 2015, the Bankruptcy Court approved the Debtors' bidding procedures motion that ~~sets~~will ~~forth~~result ~~the process by which the Debtors are authorized to solicit proposals (i.e., bids) from third parties to acquire (~~in any form and employing any structure, whether taxable (in whole or in part) or tax-free) EFH Corp.'s indirect economic ownership interest in Oncor in accordance with the Bankruptcy Code. These bidding procedures contemplate that the Debtors select a ~~stalking~~partial ~~horse bid after a two~~step-~~stage~~up ~~closed bidding process, and, after approval by the Bankruptcy Court of such stalking horse bid, the Debtors conduct a round of open bidding culminating~~ in ~~an auction intended to obtain a higher or otherwise best bid for a transaction. Initial bids were received in early March 2015, and each of~~ the ~~Debtors~~tax isbasis ~~currently assessing those submissions. EFIH cannot predict the outcome~~ of ~~this~~certain ~~process,~~TCEH including whether any acceptable bid will be received, whether the Bankruptcy Court will approve any such bid or whether any such transaction will (or when it will) ultimately close because any such transaction would be the subject of customary closing conditions, including receipt of all applicable regulatory approvals.assets;


•	the Reorganized TCEH Spin-Off will occur;


•	a consortium (collectively, the Investor Group) consisting of certain TCEH creditors, an affiliate of Hunt Consolidated, Inc. (Hunt) and certain other investors designated by Hunt will acquire (the EFH Acquisition) reorganized EFH Corp. (Reorganized EFH);

•

in connection with the EFH Acquisition, (i) the Investor Group will raise up to approximately $12.6 billion of equity and debt financing to invest in Reorganized EFH, (ii) a successor to Reorganized EFH will be converted to a real estate investment trust (REIT) under the Internal Revenue Code and (iii) all allowed claims against the EFH Corp. Debtors and the EFIH Debtors will receive treatment rendering them unimpaired (excluding any claims derived from or based upon make-whole, applicable premium, redemption premium or other similar payment provisions, or any other alleged premiums, fees, or claims relating to the repayment of claims and certain unsecured claims for post-petition interest in excess of the federal judgment rate of interest, each of which will be disallowed under the Plan of Reorganization), and


•	the Debtors, the Sponsor Group, certain settling TCEH first lien creditors, certain settling TCEH second lien creditors, certain settling TCEH unsecured creditors and the official committee of unsecured creditors of the TCEH Debtors (collectively, the Settling Parties) agreed to settle certain disputes, claims and causes of action pursuant to the Settlement Agreement (described below).

Plan Support Agreement

In August 2015 (as amended in September 2015), each of the Debtors entered into a Plan Support Agreement (Plan Support Agreement) with various of their respective creditors, the Sponsor Group, the official committee of unsecured creditors of the TCEH Debtors and the Investor Group in order to effect an agreed upon restructuring of the Debtors pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization. Pursuant to the Plan Support Agreement, the parties agreed, subject to the terms and conditions contained in the Plan Support Agreement, to support the Debtors' Plan of Reorganization. The Bankruptcy Court approved the Debtors' entry into the Plan Support Agreement in September 2015.

Pursuant to the Plan Support Agreement, certain of the parties to the Plan Support Agreement are required to not object to or interfere with an alternative plan of reorganization even if the EFH Acquisition is not completed so long as such plan meets certain minimum conditions. All or part of the Plan Support Agreement may be terminated upon the occurrence of certain events described in the Plan Support Agreement. In addition, under the Plan Support Agreement, the supporting parties have committed to support the inclusion of releases with respect to the claims described in the Settlement Agreement (described below) in the context of an alternative plan (which would become effective when an alternative plan of reorganization becomes effective).

Settlement Agreement

The Settling Parties entered into a settlement agreement (the Settlement Agreement) in August 2015 (as amended in September 2015) to compromise and settle, among other things (a) intercompany claims among the Debtors, (b) claims and causes of actions against holders of first lien claims against TCEH and the agents and under the TCEH Senior Secured Facilities, (c) claims and causes of action against holders of interests in EFH Corp. and certain related entities and (d) claims and causes of action against each of the Debtors' current and former directors, the Sponsor Group, managers and officers and other related entities. The Settlement Agreement is expected to remain effective regardless of whether the EFH Acquisition is completed. The Bankruptcy Court approved the Settlement Agreement in December 2015.

Merger and Purchase Agreement

In August 2015, EFH Corp. and EFIH entered into a Purchase Agreement and Agreement and Plan of Merger (Merger and Purchase Agreement) with two acquisition entities, Ovation Acquisition I, L.L.C. (OV1) and Ovation Acquisition II, L.L.C. (collectively, the Purchasers), which are controlled by the Investor Group. Pursuant to the Merger and Purchase Agreement, at the effective time of the Plan of Reorganization and immediately after consummation of the Reorganized TCEH Spin-Off, the Investor Group will acquire Reorganized EFH.

The Merger and Purchase Agreement contemplates that funds received by the Purchasers pursuant to the Equity Commitment Letter, the Debt Commitment Letter and the Rights Offering and Backstop (each as defined below) will be used to facilitate the acquisition of Reorganized EFH and, as applicable, repay the allowed claims of holders of claims and interests in EFH Corp. and EFIH in full in cash (or otherwise render such claims unimpaired) pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization and, if applicable, to complete the Texas Transmission Acquisition (as defined below). The Merger and Purchase Agreement includes various conditions precedent to consummation of the transactions contemplated thereby, including a condition that certain approvals and rulings be obtained, including from the PUCT and the IRS, that are necessary to consummate the EFH Acquisition and convert Reorganized EFH into a REIT.

The Merger and Purchase Agreement may be terminated upon certain events, including, among other things, (a) by either party, if certain termination events occur under the Plan Support Agreement, including if the EFH Acquisition is not completed by April 30, 2016, subject to extension to June 30, 2016 or August 31, 2016 under certain conditions, (b) by EFH Corp. or EFIH, if their respective board of directors or managers determines in good faith that proceeding with the transactions contemplated by the Merger and Purchase Agreement would be inconsistent with its applicable fiduciary duties or (c) by the Purchasers, if EFH Corp. or EFIH fails to meet various milestones related to the Debtors' Chapter 11 Cases or otherwise materially breaches the Merger and Purchase Agreement.

The Bankruptcy Court approved the Merger and Purchase Agreement in connection with confirmation of the Plan of Reorganization in December 2015.

Rights Offering

As contemplated by the Plan of Reorganization, OV1 intends to conduct an offering of equity rights (each, a Right, and such offering, the Rights Offering) to holders of unsecured debt claims, second lien debt claims, general unsecured claims and first lien secured claims against TCEH (Rights Offering Participants) enabling the Rights Offering Participants to purchase an aggregate of $5.787 billion of common stock of OV1 (as the successor by merger of Reorganized EFH). This annual report on Form 10-K does not constitute an offer to sell, or a solicitation of an offer to purchase, the Rights.

Pursuant to a Backstop Agreement (Backstop Agreement), among certain investors named therein and their permitted assignees (Backstop Purchasers), EFH Corp., EFIH and OV1, the Backstop Purchasers have agreed to backstop $5.087 billion of Rights offered to certain of the Rights Offering Participants (Backstop).

In connection with the execution of the Merger and Purchase Agreement, each member of the Investor Group (collectively, the Equity Commitment Parties) delivered (a) an equity commitment letter (Equity Commitment Letter) in favor of EFH Corp. (including Reorganized EFH), EFIH and the Purchasers pursuant to which the Equity Commitment Parties committed to invest in one or more of the Purchasers an aggregate amount of approximately $2.513 billion (assuming the Texas Transmission Acquisition (as described below) is completed) and (b) a limited guarantee (Guarantee) in favor of EFH Corp. (including Reorganized EFH) and EFIH pursuant to which each such Equity Commitment Party committed to pay its pro rata share of all fees, costs or expenses payable by the Purchasers under the Merger and Purchase Agreement or under the Plan of Reorganization if such fees, costs or expenses become payable pursuant thereto. The aggregate liability of the Equity Commitment Parties under the Guarantee for fees and expenses is capped at $35 million.

If the Merger and Purchase Agreement, the Backstop Agreement or the Equity Commitment Letter are terminated for any reason, EFH Corp. and EFIH have waived their rights to seek any legal or equitable remedies, except in connection with the reimbursement of certain fees and expenses capped at $35 million, against the Purchasers or the Investor Group, the Backstop Purchasers or the Equity Commitment Parties, respectively. In December 2015, pursuant to the court approved Merger and Purchase Agreement and the Backstop Agreement, EFH Corp. incurred approximately $49 million in fees to the Purchasers for expenses incurred in connection with those agreements.

Debt Funding Arrangements

In August 2015, in connection with the execution of the Merger and Purchase Agreement, the Investor Group entered into a commitment letter (Debt Commitment Letter) with Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. (Debt Commitment Lender) pursuant to which the Debt Commitment Lender committed to fund up to $5.5 billion under a senior secured term loan facility and $250 million under a senior secured bridge loan facility to reorganized EFIH and its subsidiaries at the closing of the EFH Acquisition.

Texas Transmission Acquisition

In connection with the EFH Acquisition and the Rights Offering, the Purchasers, EFH Corp. and EFIH have formulated a plan to create and implement an IPO Conversion (as such term is defined in the Investor Rights Agreement (Investor Rights Agreement), dated November 2008 among Oncor and certain of its direct and indirect equity holders, including EFH Corp. and Texas Transmission, pursuant to which one of the Purchasers, as the successor to Reorganized EFH as a result of the EFH Acquisition, would serve as an IPO corporation (as defined in the Investor Rights Agreement). In connection with the execution of the Merger and Purchase Agreement, the Purchasers have delivered to EFH Corp. an offer to purchase substantially all of the outstanding IPO Units (as defined in the Investor Rights Agreement) in the IPO corporation and all of the LLC Units (as defined in the Investor Rights Agreement) in Oncor held by Texas Transmission (the Texas Transmission Acquisition). EFH Corp. has instituted an adversary proceeding in the Bankruptcy Court to enforce certain rights against Texas Transmission under the Investor Rights Agreement (see Note 10).

Other

Although the Plan of Reorganization has been confirmed by the Bankruptcy Court, the effective date of the Plan of Reorganization has not occurred and there are no assurances that the transactions contemplated thereby will occur because they are subject to completion of various conditions including, but not limited to, receipt of regulatory approval from the PUCT, NRC and FERC, receipt of the Private Letter Ruling from the IRS and the repayment of the DIP Facility.

Tax Matters

In June 2014, EFH Corp. filed a request with the IRS for a private letter ruling, ~~(Private~~which ~~Letter~~request ~~Ruling)~~has ~~that,~~been ~~among~~supplemented ~~other~~from ~~things,~~time ~~will~~to ~~provide~~time ~~(a)~~in ~~that~~response ~~(i)~~to ~~the~~requests ~~transfer~~from bythe ~~TCEH~~IRS offor ~~all~~information ofor ~~its~~as ~~assets~~required ~~and~~by ~~its~~changes ~~ordinary~~in ~~course~~the ~~operating~~contemplated ~~liabilities~~transactions to(as ~~reorganized~~supplemented, ~~TCEH~~the ~~completed~~Private ~~through~~Letter aRuling). It ~~tax-free~~is ~~spin~~expected ~~(in~~that, ~~accordance~~among ~~with~~other things, the Private Letter Ruling) inif ~~connection~~obtained ~~with~~will ~~TCEH's~~provide ~~emergence from bankruptcy~~ (~~Reorganized TCEH~~A), ~~(ii)~~for ~~the~~certain ~~transfer~~rulings byregarding the ~~Debtors~~qualification toof ~~Reorganized~~(i) ~~TCEH~~the transfer of certain assets and ~~liabilities~~ordinary ~~that~~course ~~are~~operating ~~reasonably~~liabilities ~~necessary~~ to ~~the~~a ~~operation~~newly-formed ofentity wholly-owned by TCEH (Reorganized TCEH) and (~~iii~~ii) the distribution ~~by TCEH~~ of ~~(A)~~ the equity itof ~~holds in~~ Reorganized TCEH, ~~and (B)~~ the cash proceeds ~~TCEH receives~~ from Reorganized TCEH todebt, the ~~holders~~cash ofproceeds ~~TCEH~~from ~~first~~the ~~lien~~sale ~~claims,~~of ~~will~~preferred ~~qualify~~stock asin a ~~reorganization~~newly-formed ~~within~~entity, and the ~~meaning~~right ofto ~~Sections~~receive ~~368(~~payments under a) tax receivables agreement (1if any)~~(G)~~, ~~355~~to ~~and~~holders ~~356~~ of ~~the~~TCEH ~~Code~~first lien claims and (bB) ~~for~~ certain ~~other~~ rulings ~~under~~regarding ~~Sections~~the ~~368(~~eligibility of EFH Corp. to qualify as a~~)(1)(G)~~ ~~and~~REIT ~~355~~for offederal ~~the~~income ~~Code~~tax purposes. The Debtors intend to continue to pursue the Private Letter Ruling to support ~~potential~~the ~~Chapter~~Plan ~~11 plans~~ of ~~reorganization that could ultimately be proposed~~Reorganization. ~~In October 2014, the Debtors filed a memorandum with the Bankruptcy Court that described tax related matters regarding restructuring alternatives.~~

Operation and Implications of the Chapter 11 Cases

EFIH's ability to continue as a going concern is contingent upon, among other factors, its ability to comply with the financial and other covenants contained in the EFIH DIP Facilities described in Note 6, its ability to obtain new debtor in possession financing in the event the EFIH DIP Facilities were to expire during the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases and its ability to complete a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization in a timely manner, including obtaining creditor and Bankruptcy Court approval of such plan as well as applicable regulatory approvals required for such plan and obtaining any exit financing needed to implement such plan.

A Chapter 11 plan of reorganization determines the rights and satisfaction of claims of various creditors and security holders and is subject to the ultimate outcome of negotiations and Bankruptcy Court decisions ongoing through the date on which the Chapter 11 plan is confirmed. EFIH currently expect that any proposed Chapter 11 plan of reorganization will provide, among other things, mechanisms for settlement of claims against the Debtors' estates, treatment of EFH Corp.'s existing equity holders and the Debtors' respective existing debt holders, potential income tax liabilities and certain corporate governance and administrative matters pertaining to a reorganized EFH Corp. Any proposed Chapter 11 plan of reorganization will be subject to revision prior to submission to the Bankruptcy Court based upon discussions with the Debtors' creditors and other interested parties, and thereafter in response to creditor claims and objections and the requirements of the Bankruptcy Code or the Bankruptcy Court. There can be no assurance that the Debtors will be able to secure approval from the Bankruptcy Court for any Chapter 11 plan of reorganization it ultimately proposes or that any Chapter 11 plan will be accepted by the Debtors' creditors.

In order for the Debtors (including the EFIH Debtors) to emerge successfully from the Chapter 11 Cases as reorganized companies, they must obtain approval from the Bankruptcy Court and certain of their respective creditors for a Chapter 11 plan, which will enable each of the Debtors to transition from the Chapter 11 Cases into reorganized companies conducting ordinary course operations outside of bankruptcy. In connection with an exit from bankruptcy, TCEH and EFIH will require a new credit facility, or exit financing. EFIH's ability to obtain such financing and the approval of such financing will depend on, among other things, the timing and outcome of various ongoing matters in the Chapter 11 Cases.

Pre-Petition Claims

Holders of the substantial majority of pre-petition claims were required to file proofs of claims by the bar date established by the Bankruptcy Court. A bar date is the date by which certain claims against the Debtors must be filed if the claimants wish to receive any distribution in the Chapter 11 Cases. The Bankruptcy Court established a bar date of October 27, 2014 for the substantial majority of claims. The Debtors have received approximately 10,000 filed claims since the Petition Date. The Debtors are in the process of reconciling those claims to the amounts listed in its schedules of assets and liabilities, which includes communications with claimants to acquire additional information required for reconciliation. As of March 31, 2015, approximately 2,450 of those claims have been settled, withdrawn or expunged. To the extent claims are reconciled and resolved, EFIH has recorded them at the expected allowed amount. Claims that remain unresolved or unreconciled through the filing of this report have been estimated based upon management's best estimate of the likely claim amounts that the Bankruptcy Court will ultimately allow.

~~Beginning~~Implications in November 2014, EFH Corp. began the process to request the Bankruptcy Court to disallow claims that it believes are duplicative, have been later amended or superseded, are without merit, are overstated or should be disallowed for other reasons. Given the substantial number of ~~claims filed,~~ the ~~claims~~Chapter ~~resolution~~11 process will take considerable time to complete. Differences between liability amounts recorded by the company as liabilities subject to compromise and claims filed by creditors will be investigated and, if necessary, the Bankruptcy Court will make a final determination of the allowable claim. Differences between those final allowed claims and the liabilities recorded in the consolidated balance sheets will be recognized as reorganization items in EFIH's statements of consolidated income (loss) as they are resolved. The determination of how liabilities will ultimately be resolved cannot be made until the Bankruptcy Court approves a plan of reorganization or approves orders related to settlement of specific liabilities. Accordingly, the ultimate amount or resolution of such liabilities is not determinable at this time. The resolution of such claims could result in material adjustments to the company's financial statements.Cases

EFIH's ability to continue as a going concern is contingent upon, among other factors, its ability to comply with the financial and other covenants contained in the DIP Facility described in Note 8, its ability to obtain new debtor in possession financing in the event the DIP Facility were to expire during the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases as well as EFIH's ability to obtain applicable regulatory approvals required for the effectiveness of the Plan of Reorganization and its ability to obtain any exit financing needed to implement the Plan of Reorganization. These circumstances and uncertainties inherent in the bankruptcy proceedings raise substantial doubt about EFIH's ability to continue as a going concern.

Operations During the Chapter 11 Cases

In general, the Debtors have received final bankruptcy court orders with respect to first day motions and other operating motions that allow the Debtors to operate their businesses in the ordinary course. In addition, the Bankruptcy Court has issued orders approving the DIP Facility discussed in Note 8.

Pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, the Debtors intend to comply with all applicable regulatory requirements, including all requirements related to environmental and safety law compliance, during the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases. Further, the Debtors have been complying, and intend to continue to comply, with the various reporting obligations that are required by the Bankruptcy Court during the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases. Moreover, to the extent the Debtors either maintain insurance policies or self-insure their regulatory compliance obligations, the Debtors intend to continue such insurance policies or self-insurance in the ordinary course of business.

Pre-Petition Claims

The Debtors have received approximately 41,300 filed claims since the Petition Date, including approximately 30,900 in filed asbestos claims. Most of the asbestos claims were received at or near the bar date and the Debtors are actively validating, reconciling and reviewing those claims. For all of the claims, the Debtors are in the process of reconciling those claims to the amounts listed in its schedules of assets and liabilities, which includes communications with claimants to acquire additional information required for reconciliation. As of February 29, 2016, approximately 5,500 of those claims have been settled, withdrawn or expunged. To the extent claims are reconciled and resolved, the Debtors have recorded them at the expected allowed amount. Certain claims filed or reflected in its schedules of assets and liabilities will be resolved on the effective date of the Plan of Reorganization, including certain claims filed by holders of funded debt and contract counterparties. Claims that remain unresolved or unreconciled through the filing of this report have been estimated based upon management's best estimate of the likely claim amounts that the Bankruptcy Court will ultimately allow.

In November 2014,the Debtors began the process to request the Bankruptcy Court to disallow claims that it believes are duplicative, have been later amended or superseded, are without merit, are overstated or should be disallowed for other reasons. Given the substantial number of claims filed, the claims resolution process will take considerable time to complete. Differences between liability amounts recorded by the Debtors as liabilities subject to compromise and claims filed by creditors will be investigated and, if necessary, the Bankruptcy Court will make a final determination of the allowable claim. Differences between those final allowed claims and the liabilities recorded in the consolidated balance sheets will be recognized as reorganization items in EFIH's statements of consolidated income (loss) as they are resolved. The determination of how liabilities will ultimately be resolved cannot be made until a plan of reorganization or a court approved order related to settlement of specific liabilities becomes effective. Accordingly, the ultimate amount or resolution of such liabilities is not determinable at this time. The resolution of such claims could result in material adjustments to EFIH's financial statements.


3.	INVESTMENT IN ONCOR HOLDINGS

EFIH has a wholly-owned subsidiary, Oncor Holdings, which holds an approximate 80% equity interest in Oncor. Oncor Holdings is considered a variable interest entity (VIE). A VIE is an entity with which an entity has a relationship or arrangement that indicates some level of control over the entity or results in economic risks to it. Accounting standards require consolidation of a VIE if an entity has (a) the power to direct the significant activities of the VIE and (b) the right or obligation to absorb profit and loss from the VIE (i.e., the entity is the primary beneficiary of the VIE). In determining the appropriateness of consolidation of a VIE, EFIH evaluates its purpose, governance structure, decision making processes and risks that are passed on to its interest holders. EFIH also examines the nature of any related party relationships among the interest holders of the VIE and the nature of any special rights granted to the interest holders of the VIE.

As discussed below, EFIH's consolidated balance sheets include assets and liabilities of VIEs that meet the consolidation standards. The maximum exposure to loss from EFIH's interests in VIEs does not exceed its carrying value.

EFIH does not consolidate Oncor Holdings and instead accounts for it as an equity method investment because the structural and operational ring-fencing measures discussed in Note 1 prevent it from having power to direct the significant activities of Oncor Holdings or Oncor. In accordance with accounting standards, EFIH accounts for its investment in Oncor Holdings under the equity method, as opposed to the cost method, based on its level of influence over its activities.

In reaching the conclusion to deconsolidate, EFIH conducted an extensive analysis of Oncor Holdings' underlying governing documents and management structure. Oncor Holdings' unique governance structure was adopted in conjunction with the Merger, when the Sponsor Group, EFH Corp. and Oncor agreed to implement structural and operational measures to ring-fence (the Ring-Fencing Measures) Oncor Holdings and Oncor as discussed in Note 1. The Ring-Fencing Measures were designed to prevent, among other things, (i) increased borrowing costs at Oncor due to the attribution to Oncor of debt from any of EFH Corp.'s other subsidiaries, (ii) the activities of EFH Corp.'s competitive operations following the Merger resulting in the deterioration of Oncor's business, financial condition and/or investment in infrastructure, and (iii) Oncor becoming substantively consolidated into a bankruptcy proceeding involving any member of the Texas Holdings Group. The Ring-Fencing Measures effectively separate the daily operational and management control of Oncor Holdings and Oncor from EFH Corp. and its other subsidiaries. By implementing the Ring-Fencing Measures, Oncor maintained its investment grade credit rating following the Merger, and EFH Corp. reaffirmed Oncor's independence from its competitive businesses to the PUCT.

EFIH determined the most significant activities affecting the economic performance of Oncor Holdings (and Oncor) are the operation, maintenance and growth of Oncor's electric transmission and distribution assets and the preservation of its investment grade credit profile. The boards of directors of Oncor Holdings and Oncor have ultimate responsibility for the management of the day-to-day operations of their respective businesses, including the approval of Oncor's capital expenditure and operating budgets and the timing and prosecution of Oncor's rate cases. While both boards include members appointed by EFH Corp., a majority of the board members are independent in accordance with rules established by the New York Stock Exchange, and therefore, EFIH concluded for purposes of applying the amended accounting standards that EFH Corp. does not have the power to control the activities deemed most significant to Oncor Holdings' (and Oncor's) economic performance.

In assessing EFIH's ability to exercise control over Oncor Holdings and Oncor, EFIH considered whether it could take actions to circumvent the purpose and intent of the Ring-Fencing Measures (including changing the composition of Oncor Holdings' or Oncor's board) in order to gain control over the day-to-day operations of either Oncor Holdings or Oncor. EFIH also considered whether (i) it has the unilateral power to dissolve, liquidate or force into bankruptcy either Oncor Holdings or Oncor, (ii) it could unilaterally amend the Ring-Fencing Measures contained in the underlying governing documents of Oncor Holdings or Oncor, and (iii) it could control Oncor's ability to pay distributions and thereby enhance its own cash flow. EFIH concluded that, in each case, no such opportunity exists.

The carrying value of EFIH's variable interest in Oncor Holdings totaled $6.~~050~~059 billion and $56.~~950~~050 billion at December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively, and is reported as investment in Oncor Holdings in EFIH's consolidated balance sheets. EFIH's maximum exposure to loss from this investment does not exceed its carrying value.

See Note 12 for discussion of Oncor Holdings' and Oncor's transactions with EFH Corp. and its other subsidiaries.

Distributions from Oncor Holdings — Oncor Holdings' distributions of earnings to EFIH totaled $322 million, $202 million and $213 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Distributions may not be paid except to the extent Oncor maintains a required regulatory capital structure as discussed below. At December 31, 2015, $30 million was eligible to be distributed to Oncor's members after taking into account the regulatory capital structure limit. The boards of directors of each of Oncor and Oncor Holdings can withhold distributions to the extent the applicable board determines in good faith that it is necessary to retain such amounts to meet expected future requirements of Oncor and/or Oncor Holdings.

~~Distributions~~Oncor's ~~from~~distributions ~~Oncor~~are ~~Holdings~~limited —by ~~Oncor~~its ~~Holdings'~~regulatory ~~distributions~~capital ofstructure, ~~earnings~~which is required to ~~EFIH~~be ~~totaled~~at ~~$202~~or ~~million,~~below ~~$213~~the ~~million~~assumed ~~and~~debt-to-equity ~~$147~~ratio ~~million~~established ~~for~~by the ~~years~~PUCT ~~ended~~for ratemaking purposes, which is currently set at 60% debt to 40% equity. At December 31, ~~2014~~2015, ~~2013~~Oncor's regulatory capitalization ratio was 59.8% debt and ~~2012,~~40.2% ~~respectively~~equity. ~~Distributions~~For ~~may~~purposes ~~not~~of bethis ~~paid~~ratio, ~~except~~debt tois ~~the~~calculated ~~extent~~as ~~Oncor~~long-term ~~maintains~~debt aplus ~~required~~unamortized ~~regulatory~~gains ~~capital~~on ~~structure~~reacquired asdebt ~~discussed~~less ~~below. At~~unamortized ~~December 31,~~issuance ~~2014~~expenses, ~~$184~~premiums ~~million~~and ~~was~~losses ~~eligible~~on toreacquired bedebt. The ~~distributed~~debt tocalculation ~~Oncor's~~excludes ~~members~~bonds ~~after~~issued ~~taking~~by ~~into~~Oncor ~~account~~Electric ~~the~~Delivery ~~regulatory~~Transition ~~capital~~Bond ~~structure~~Company ~~limit~~LLC, of which ~~approximately~~were ~~80%~~issued orin ~~$146~~2003 ~~million~~and ~~relates~~2004 to ~~EFIH's~~recover ~~ownership~~specific ~~interest~~generation-related inregulatory ~~Oncor. The~~assets ~~boards~~and ofother ~~directors~~qualified ofcosts. Equity ~~each~~is ofcalculated ~~Oncor~~as ~~and~~membership ~~Oncor~~interests ~~Holdings~~determined ~~can~~in ~~withhold~~accordance ~~distributions~~with toUS ~~the~~GAAP, ~~extent~~excluding the ~~applicable~~effects ~~board~~of ~~determines~~accounting infor ~~good~~the ~~faith~~Merger ~~that~~(which itincluded isrecording ~~necessary~~the toinitial ~~retain~~goodwill ~~such~~and ~~amounts~~fair tovalue ~~meet~~adjustments ~~expected~~and ~~future~~the ~~requirements~~subsequent ofrelated ~~Oncor~~impairments and~~/or~~ ~~Oncor Holdings~~amortization).

For the period beginning October 11, 2007 and ending December 31, 2012, distributions (other than distributions of the proceeds of any equity issuance) paid by Oncor to its members were limited by a PUCT order to an amount not to exceed Oncor's cumulative net income determined in accordance with US GAAP, as adjusted. Adjustments consisted of the removal of noncash impacts of purchase accounting and deducting two specific cash commitments. The noncash impacts consisted of removing the effect of an $860 million goodwill impairment charge in 2008 and the cumulative amount of net accretion of fair value adjustments. The two specific cash commitments were a $72 million ($46 million after tax) one-time refund to customers in September 2008 and funds spent as part of a five-year, $100 million commitment for additional energy efficiency initiatives that was completed in 2012.

Oncor's distributions are limited by its regulatory capital structure, which is required to be at or below the assumed debt-to-equity ratio established periodically by the PUCT for ratemaking purposes, which is currently set at 60% debt to 40% equity. At December 31, 2014, Oncor's regulatory capitalization ratio was 58.8% debt and 41.2% equity. For purposes of this ratio, debt is calculated as long-term debt plus unamortized gains on reacquired debt less unamortized issuance expenses, premiums and losses on reacquired debt. The debt calculation excludes bonds issued by Oncor Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC, which were issued in 2003 and 2004 to recover specific generation-related regulatory assets and other qualified costs. Equity is calculated as membership interests determined in accordance with US GAAP, excluding the effects of accounting for the Merger (which included recording the initial goodwill and fair value adjustments and the subsequent related impairments and amortization).

As a result of the Bankruptcy Filing, Oncor had credit risk exposure to trade accounts receivable from subsidiaries of TCEH, which related to delivery services provided by Oncor to TCEH's retail electricity operations. At the Petition Date, these accounts receivable totaled $109 million. In June 2014, the Bankruptcy Court authorized the Debtors to pay all pre-petition delivery charges due Oncor, and such amounts were paid in full.

EFH Corp., Oncor Holdings, Oncor and Oncor's minority investor are parties to a Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement. Additional income tax amounts receivable or payable may arise in the normal course under that agreement.

Oncor Holdings Financial Statements — Condensed statements of consolidated income of Oncor Holdings and its subsidiaries for the years ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013 are presented below:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2014			2013			2012
	2015			2014			2013
Operating revenues	$	3,~~822~~878		$	3,~~552~~822		$	3,~~328~~552
Operation and maintenance expenses	(1,~~453~~526		)	(1,~~269~~453		)	(1,~~171~~269		)
Depreciation and amortization	(~~851~~863		)	(~~814~~851		)	(~~771~~814		)
Taxes other than income taxes	(~~438~~450		)	(~~424~~438		)	(~~415~~424		)
Other income	136			1813			2618
Other deductions	(1528		)	(15		)	(6415		)
Interest income	3—			43			244
Interest expense and related charges	(~~353~~333		)	(~~371~~353		)	(~~374~~371		)
Income before income taxes	~~728~~684			~~681~~728			~~583~~681
Income tax expense	(~~289~~264		)	(~~259~~289		)	(~~243~~259		)
Net income	~~439~~420			~~422~~439			~~340~~422
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests	(9086		)	(8790		)	(7087		)
Net income attributable to Oncor Holdings	$	~~349~~334		$	~~335~~349		$	~~270~~335

Assets and liabilities of Oncor Holdings at December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 are presented below:

	December 31,
	2014		2013
	2015		2014
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	526	$	285
Restricted cash	5638		5256
Trade accounts receivable — net	~~407~~388		~~385~~407
Trade accounts and other receivables from affiliates	118		~~135~~118
Income taxes receivable from EFH Corp.	~~144~~107		16144
Inventories	7382		6573
Accumulated deferred income taxes	10—		3210
Prepayments and other current assets	9188		8291
Total current assets	~~904~~847		~~795~~904
Restricted cash	16—		16
Other investments	97		9197
Property, plant and equipment — net	1213,~~463~~024		1112,~~902~~463
Goodwill	4,064		4,064
Regulatory assets — net	1,~~429~~194		1,~~324~~429
Other noncurrent assets	6731		7134
Total assets	$	19,~~040~~257	$	1819,~~263~~007
LIABILITIES
Current liabilities:
Short-term borrowings	$	~~711~~840	$	~~745~~711
Long-term debt due currently	~~639~~41		~~131~~639
Trade accounts payable — nonaffiliates	~~202~~150		~~178~~202
Income taxes payable to EFH Corp.	2420		2324
Accrued taxes other than income	~~174~~181		~~169~~174
Accrued interest	9382		9593
Other current liabilities	~~156~~144		~~135~~156
Total current liabilities	1,~~999~~458		1,~~476~~999
Accumulated deferred income taxes	1,~~978~~985		1,~~905~~978
Long-term debt, less amounts due currently	45,~~997~~646		54,~~381~~964
Other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits	2,~~245~~306		12,~~822~~245
Total liabilities	$	11,~~219~~395	$	1011,~~584~~186

4. ~~INCOME~~OTHER ~~TAXES~~DEDUCTIONS

EFIH has income tax receivables from EFH Corp. that arose under the Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement. In consideration of the Bankruptcy Filing, EFIH has fully reserved all amounts under that agreement because of the significant uncertainty regarding their ultimate settlement, resulting in charges of $173 million, $125 million and $110 million at December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

EFIH also fully reserved a pre-petition intercompany accounts receivable because of significant uncertainty regarding its ultimate settlement, resulting in a charge of $3 million at December 31, 2014.


5.	INCOME TAXES

EFH Corp. and certain of its subsidiaries (including EFCH, EFIH, and TCEH, but not including Oncor Holdings and Oncor) are parties to a Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement, which provides ~~for the computation of income tax liabilities and benefits~~, ~~and~~ among other things, that ~~each~~any ofcorporate ~~EFCH,~~member ~~EFIH,~~or ~~TCEH~~disregarded ~~and~~entity ~~any~~in ~~other~~the ~~subsidiaries~~EFH ~~under~~Corp. ~~the~~group ~~agreement~~ is required to make payments to EFH Corp. in an amount calculated to approximate the amount of tax liability such entity would have owed if it filed a separate corporate tax return. ~~Accordingly,~~The ~~EFIH's~~Plan ~~income~~of ~~tax~~Reorganization ~~expense~~provides ~~and~~that ~~related~~the ~~balance~~Debtors ~~sheet~~will ~~amounts~~reject ~~are~~this ~~recorded~~agreement asat ifthe ~~EFIH~~effective ~~files~~time ~~its~~of ~~own~~the ~~corporate~~Plan ~~income~~of ~~tax returns~~Reorganization. ~~Deferred~~Under the Settlement Agreement, no further cash payments will be made in respect of federal income taxes. However, ~~are~~solely ~~provided~~ for ~~temporary~~accounting ~~differences~~purposes, ~~between~~the EFH Corp. group continues to allocate federal income taxes among the ~~book~~entities ~~and~~that ~~tax~~are ~~basis~~parties ofto ~~assets~~the Federal and ~~liabilities~~State asIncome ~~required~~Tax ~~under~~Allocation ~~accounting rules~~Agreement. ~~Income~~The ~~tax~~Settlement ~~assets~~Agreement ~~and~~did ~~liabilities~~not ~~related~~alter tothe ~~pushed~~allocation ~~down~~and ~~debt~~payment ~~are~~for ~~settled~~state asincome ~~membership~~taxes, ~~interests~~which ~~transactions~~will continue to be settled.

~~Deferred~~EFH ~~income~~Corp., ~~taxes~~Oncor ~~arise~~Holdings, ~~from~~Oncor ~~temporary~~and ~~differences~~Oncor's ~~between~~minority ~~the~~investor ~~tax~~are ~~basis~~parties ofto ~~assets~~a ~~and~~separate ~~liabilities~~Federal and ~~their~~State ~~reported~~Income ~~amounts~~Tax inAllocation Agreement, which governs the ~~financial~~computation ~~statements~~of federal income tax liability among such parties, ~~which~~and ~~will~~similarly ~~result~~provides, inamong ~~taxable~~other orthings, ~~deductible~~that ~~amounts~~each inof ~~the~~Oncor ~~future. In~~Holdings ~~evaluating~~and ~~EFIH's~~Oncor ~~ability~~will topay ~~recover~~EFH Corp. its ~~deferred~~share ~~tax~~of ~~assets~~an ~~related~~amount calculated to ~~its~~approximate ~~net~~the ~~operating~~amount ~~losses,~~of ~~EFIH~~tax ~~considers~~liability ~~all~~such ~~available~~entity ~~positive~~would ~~and~~have ~~negative~~owed ~~information,~~if ~~including~~it ~~scheduled~~filed ~~reversals~~a ofseparate ~~deferred~~corporate tax ~~liabilities,~~return. The ~~projected~~Settlement ~~future~~Agreement ~~taxable~~had ~~income,~~no impact on the tax~~-planning~~ ~~strategies~~sharing agreement among EFH, ~~and~~Oncor ~~results~~Holdings ofand ~~operations~~Oncor. ~~Due~~Accordingly, toEFIH's ~~the~~income ~~significant~~tax ~~uncertainty~~expense ofand ~~the~~related ~~ultimate~~balance ~~recovery~~sheet byamounts ~~EFIH~~are ofrecorded ~~the~~as ~~benefit~~if ofEFIH files its ~~NOLs,~~own acorporate ~~valuation~~income ~~allowance~~tax ofreturns. Deferred ~~$72~~income ~~million~~taxes ~~has~~are ~~been~~provided ~~recorded~~for ontemporary ~~EFIH’s~~differences ~~net~~between ~~deferred~~the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities as ofrequired ~~December~~under ~~31,~~accounting ~~2014~~rules. Income tax assets and liabilities related to pushed down debt are settled as membership interests transactions.

~~EFH~~In ~~Corp.,~~evaluating ~~Oncor~~EFIH's ~~Holdings,~~ability ~~Oncor~~to ~~and~~utilize ~~Oncor's~~its ~~third-party~~deferred ~~minority~~tax ~~investor~~assets ~~are~~related ~~parties~~ to aits ~~separate~~net ~~Federal~~operating ~~and~~losses, ~~State~~EFIH ~~Income~~considers ~~Tax~~all ~~Allocation~~available ~~Agreement,~~positive ~~which~~and ~~governs~~negative ~~the~~information, ~~computation~~including ofscheduled ~~federal~~reversals ~~income~~of deferred tax ~~liability~~liabilities, ~~among~~taxable ~~such~~income, ~~parties~~tax-planning strategies, and ~~similarly~~results ~~provides~~of operations. In 2014, ~~among~~due ~~other~~to ~~things~~the uncertainty of the ultimate recovery by EFIH of the benefit of its NOLs, ~~that~~a ~~each~~valuation allowance of ~~Oncor~~$72 ~~Holdings~~million ~~and~~had ~~Oncor~~been ~~will~~recorded ~~pay~~on ~~EFH~~EFIH’s ~~Corp.~~net ~~its~~deferred ~~share~~tax assets. As of anDecember 31, ~~amount~~2015 ~~calculated~~that tovaluation ~~approximate~~allowance totaled $497 million. During 2015, increases in the ~~amount~~NOLs ofrequired ~~tax~~an ~~liability~~increase ~~such~~in ~~entity~~the ~~would~~valuation ~~have~~allowance ~~owed~~by ifapproximately it$425 ~~filed~~million, aof ~~separate~~which ~~corporate~~$203 million decreased the income tax ~~return~~benefit and $222 million decreased membership interests.

The components of EFIH's income tax ~~expense (~~benefit) are as follows:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2014			2013			2012
	2015			2014			2013
Current:
US Federal	$	(~~104~~88	)	$	(~~115~~104	)	$	25(115	)
State	—			1—			41
Total current	(88		)	(104		)	(114		)
Deferred:
US Federal	~~(52~~—		)	(5552		)	(255		)
State	1—			—1			—
Total income tax expense (benefit)	$	(155	)	$	(169	)	$	27
Total deferred	—			(51		)	(55		)
Total	$	(88	)	$	(155	)	$	(169	)

Reconciliation of income taxes computed at the US federal statutory rate to income tax expense (benefit) recorded:

	Year Ended December 31,
	2014			2013			2012
Income (loss) before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries	$	(858	)	$	(606	)	$	72
Income taxes at the US federal statutory rate of 35%	(300		)	(212		)	25
Nondeductible reserve for tax receivable from EFH Corp.	43			38			—
Nondeductible debt restructuring costs	28			—			—
Valuation allowance	72			—			—
Other	2			5			2
Income tax expense (benefit)	$	(155	)	$	(169	)	$	27
Effective rate	18.1		%	27.9		%	37.5		%

Reconciliation of income taxes computed at the US federal statutory rate to income tax benefit recorded is as follows:



	Year Ended December 31,
	2015			2014			2013
Loss before income taxes and equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries	$	(721	)	$	(858	)	$	(606	)
Income taxes at the US federal statutory rate of 35%	(252		)	(300		)	(212		)
Nondeductible reserve for tax receivable from EFH Corp.	(82		)	43			38
Nondeductible debt restructuring costs	43			28			—
Valuation allowance (a)	203			72			—
Other	—			2			5
Income tax benefit	$	(88	)	$	(155	)	$	(169	)
Effective tax rate	12.2		%	18.1		%	27.9		%

____________


(a)	$222 million of the increase in the valuation allowance related to the elimination of affiliate debt and was allocated to membership interests consistent with the classification of investment in affiliate debt. (See Note 11).

Deferred Income Tax Balances

Deferred income taxes provided for temporary differences based on tax laws in effect at December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 are as follows:

	December 31,
	2014								2013
	2015			2014
	Total		Current			Noncurrent			Total				Current		Noncurrent
	Total Noncurrent (a)			Total			Current			Noncurrent
Deferred Income Tax Assets:
Accrued interest	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	3			$	—	$	3
Net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards	$	662		$	232		$	—		$	232
Net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards	232		—			232			—				—		—
Debt extinguishment gains (Note 8)	7			30			—			30
Debt extinguishment gains (Note 8)	30		—			30			49				—		49
Other	1			2			—			2
Other	2		—			2			1				—		1
Total	670			264			—			264
Total	264		—			264			53				—		53
Deferred Income Tax Liabilities:
Deferred Income Tax Liabilities:
Debt extinguishment gains related to pushed down debt of EFH Corp. (Note 8)	—			80			26			54
Debt extinguishment gains related to pushed down debt of EFH Corp. (Note 8)	80		26			54			103				26		77
Accrued interest	173			106			—			106
Accrued interest	106		—			106			—				—		—
Debt fair value discount	—			6			—			6
Debt fair value discount	6		—			6			—				—		—
Total	173			192			26			166
Total	192		26			166			103				26		77
Valuation Allowance	497			72			—			72
Valuation Allowance	72		—			72			—				—		—
Net Accumulated Deferred Income Tax (Asset) Liability	$	—		$	—		$	26		$	(26	)
Net Accumulated Deferred Income Tax (Asset) Liability	$	—	$	26		$	(26	)	$	50			$	26	$	24

For the year ended December 31, 2014, EFIH generated net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards for federal income tax purposes of $663 million. EFIH believes that it is more likely than not that the benefit from the NOLs will not be realized. In recognition of this risk, EFIH has recorded a valuation allowance of $72 million on the net deferred tax assets. If EFIH's assumptions change and it determines it will be able to realize these NOLs, the tax benefits relating to any reversal of the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets would be recorded to income tax benefit. For the year ended December 31, 2013, EFIH generated NOLs for federal income tax purposes of $328 million. ____________

~~Under the Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement, EFIH had recorded~~ (a) ~~current~~Reflects ~~income~~adoption ~~tax~~of ~~receivables~~ASU ~~from EFH Corp.~~2015-17, ~~which~~Balance ~~totaled~~Sheet ~~$125~~Classification ~~million~~of ~~and~~Deferred ~~$110 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, because EFH Corp~~Taxes. ~~utilized the loss to offset current taxable income from Oncor.~~ See Note ~~5 for discussion of the reserve recorded against the income tax receivable~~1.

5At December 31, 2015, EFIH had $1.89 ~~OTHER~~billion ~~DEDUCTIONS~~in net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards for federal income tax purposes that will expire between 2034 and 2035. EFIH believes that it is more likely than not that the benefit from the NOLs will not be realized. In recognition of this risk, EFIH has recorded a cumulative valuation allowance of $497 million on the net deferred tax assets at December 31, 2015. If EFIH's assumptions change and it determines it will be able to realize these NOLs, the tax benefits relating to any reversal of the valuation allowance on deferred tax assets would be recorded to income tax benefit. See Note 2 for discussion of the Settlement Agreement.

~~EFIH~~Under ~~has income tax receivables from EFH Corp. that arose under~~ the Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement~~. In consideration of the Bankruptcy Filing~~, EFIH ~~fully~~had ~~reserved~~recorded ~~the~~current income tax receivables ~~because~~from ofEFH ~~the significant uncertainty regarding their ultimate settlement~~Corp., ~~resulting~~which intotaled ~~charges of~~ $~~125~~173 million and $~~110~~125 million at December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively. See Note 4 for discussion of the reserve recorded against the income tax receivable.

6. ~~DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION~~INTEREST ~~BORROWING~~EXPENSE ~~FACILITIES~~AND RELATED CHARGES

EFIH DIP Facility and EFIH First Lien Notes Settlement — The Bankruptcy Court approved the EFIH DIP Facility in June 2014. The EFIH DIP Facility provides for a $5.4 billion first-lien debtor-in-possession financing facility, all of which was utilized as of December 31, 2014 as follows:



	Year Ended December 31,
	2015		2014			2013
Interest expense on debtor-in-possession financing	$	234	$	125		$	—
Interest paid/accrued on pre-petition debt	235		267			630
Interest expense related to pushed down debt	—		1			6
Interest expense on pre-petition toggle notes payable in additional principal (Note 9)	—		65			176
Amortization of debt exchange premiums	—		(24		)	(80		)
Amortization of debt exchange discounts and issuance costs	—		7			28
Total interest expense and related charges	$	469	$	441		$	760

•Interest ~~$1.836~~expense ~~billion~~for ofthe ~~loans~~year ~~issued~~ended ~~under~~December 31, ~~the~~2015 ~~facility~~reflects ~~were~~interest ~~issued~~paid asand anaccrued ~~exchange~~on todebtor-in-possession ~~holders~~financing ofand ~~$1.673~~post-petition ~~billion~~interest ~~principal~~paid ~~amount~~on of EFIH's ~~First~~pre-petition 11.00% Second Lien Notes ~~plus~~due ~~accrued~~2021 and ~~unpaid interest totaling $78 million~~11.75% ~~Holders~~Second ofLien ~~substantially~~Notes ~~all~~due of2022 ~~the principal amount exchanged received~~ as ~~payment~~approved inby ~~full a principal amount of loans under~~ the ~~DIP~~Bankruptcy ~~facility~~Court ~~equal~~in toMarch ~~105%~~2015 of(See ~~the~~Notes ~~principal~~8 ~~amount of the notes held plus 101% of the accrued~~ and ~~unpaid interest at the non-default rate on such principal;~~9).

•The ~~$2.438~~Bankruptcy ~~billion~~Code generally restricts payment of ~~cash~~interest ~~borrowings~~on ~~were~~pre-petition ~~used~~debt, subject to ~~repay~~certain ~~all~~exceptions. However, ~~remaining~~the ~~$2.312~~Bankruptcy ~~billion~~Court ~~principal~~ordered ~~amount~~the payment of post-petition interest on the EFIH First Lien Notes in connection with the settlement in June 2014 as discussed in Note 8. Additionally, the Bankruptcy Court approved post-petition interest payments on the EFIH Second Lien Notes in March 2015 as discussed in Note 9. Additional payments may also be made upon approval by the Bankruptcy Court, at the federal judgment rate (~~plus~~see ~~accrued~~Note 10). Other than these amounts ordered or approved by the Bankruptcy Court, effective April 29, 2014, EFIH discontinued recording interest expense on outstanding pre-petition debt classified as liabilities subject to compromise (LSTC). The table below shows contractual interest amounts, which are amounts due under the contractual terms of EFIH's outstanding debt, including debt subject to compromise during the Chapter 11 Cases. Interest expense reported in the condensed statements of consolidated income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2015 and ~~unpaid~~the post-petition period ended December 31, 2014 does not include $365 million and $309 million, respectively in contractual interest ~~totaling~~on pre-petition debt classified as LSTC, which has been stayed by the Bankruptcy Count effective on the Petition Date, Interest expense as calculated under the contractual terms of EFIH's pre-petition debt, all of which is subject to compromise, totaled $~~128~~415 million) and $363 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 and for the post-petition period through December 31, 2014, respectively. Of the $235 million of interest paid/accrued on pre-petition debt for the year ended December 31, 2015, $50 million is contractually related to 2015, which is $365 million lower than the contractual requirement for the period. The remaining $185 million of interest paid on pre-petition debt related to contractual interest from 2014, which was accrued and paid in 2015 upon Bankruptcy Court approval.

• Remaining borrowings under the facility, net of fees, of $1.038 billion are held as cash and cash equivalents.



	Year Ended December 31, 2015		Post-Petition Period Ended December 31, 2014
Contractual interest on debt classified as LSTC	$	415	$	363
Approved interest paid/accrued (a)	50		54
Contractual interest on debt classified as LSTC not paid/accrued	$	365	$	309

The exchange and settlement of the EFIH First Lien Notes resulted in a loss of $108 million, reported in reorganization items, which represents the excess of the principal amounts of debt issued, cash repayments and deferred financing costs associated with the exchanged and settled debt over the carrying value of the exchanged and settled debt and related accrued interest.___________

~~The~~(a) ~~principal~~For ~~amounts~~the ~~outstanding~~year ~~under~~ended ~~the~~December ~~EFIH~~31, ~~DIP~~2015, ~~Facility~~represents ~~bear~~portion of interest ~~based~~related onto ~~applicable~~the ~~LIBOR~~EFIH ~~rates,~~Second ~~subject~~Lien toNotes athat 1%was ~~floor,~~repaid ~~plus~~based ~~3.25%. At~~on ~~December 31,~~the ~~2014,~~approval ~~outstanding~~of ~~borrowings under~~ the ~~EFIH~~Bankruptcy ~~DIP~~Court; ~~Facility~~however, ~~totaled~~excludes $~~5.4~~185 ~~billion~~million atof anpost-petition ~~annual~~ interest ~~rate~~paid ofin ~~4.25%. The~~2015 ~~EFIH~~that ~~DIP~~contractually ~~Facility~~related isto a2014 ~~non-amortizing~~and ~~loan~~default ~~that~~interest ~~may,~~(see ~~subject~~Note to9). ~~certain~~For ~~limitations,~~the bepost-petition ~~voluntarily~~period ~~prepaid~~ended byDecember ~~the~~31, 2014, represents interest on EFIH ~~Debtors,~~First inLien ~~whole~~Notes orexchanged inand ~~part,~~settled ~~without~~in ~~any~~June ~~premium~~2014 or(see ~~penalty~~Note 8).

The EFIH DIP Facility will mature on the earlier of (a) the effective date of any reorganization plan, (b) upon the event of the sale of substantially all of EFIH's assets or (c) June 2016. The maturity date may be extended to no later than December 2016 subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including the payment of a 25 basis point extension fee, a requirement that an acceptable plan of reorganization has been filed on or prior to such extension and the availability of certain metrics of liquidity applicable to EFIH and EFIH Finance.

EFIH's obligations under the EFIH DIP Facility are secured by a first lien covering substantially all of EFIH's assets, rights and properties, subject to certain exceptions set forth in the EFIH DIP Facility. The EFIH DIP Facility provides that all obligations thereunder constitute administrative expenses in the Chapter 11 Cases, with administrative priority and senior secured status under the Bankruptcy Code and, subject to certain exceptions set forth in the EFIH DIP Facility, will have priority over any and all administrative expense claims, unsecured claims and costs and expenses in the Chapter 11 Cases.

The EFIH DIP Facility provides for affirmative and negative covenants applicable to EFIH and EFIH Finance, including affirmative covenants requiring EFIH and EFIH Finance to provide financial information, budgets and other information to the agents under the EFIH DIP Facility, and negative covenants restricting EFIH's and EFIH Finance's ability to incur additional indebtedness, grant liens, dispose of assets, pay dividends or take certain other actions, in each case except as permitted in the EFIH DIP Facility. The EFIH DIP Facility also includes a minimum liquidity covenant pursuant to which EFIH cannot allow the amount of its unrestricted cash (as defined in the EFIH DIP Facility) to be less than $150 million. The Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities are not restricted subsidiaries for purposes of the EFIH DIP Facility.

The EFIH DIP Facility provides for certain customary events of default, including events of default resulting from non-payment of principal, interest or other amounts when due, material breaches of representations and warranties, material breaches of covenants in the EFIH DIP Facility or ancillary loan documents, cross-defaults under other agreements or instruments and the entry of material judgments against EFIH. Upon the existence of an event of default, the EFIH DIP Facility provides that all principal, interest and other amounts due thereunder will become immediately due and payable, either automatically or at the election of specified lenders.

The EFIH DIP Facility permits, subject to certain terms, conditions and limitations set forth in the EFIH DIP Facility, EFIH to incur incremental junior lien subordinated debt in an aggregate amount not to exceed $3 billion.


7.	REORGANIZATION ITEMS

Expenses and income directly associated with the Chapter 11 Cases are reported separately in the ~~condensed~~ statements of consolidated income (loss) as reorganization items as required by ASC 852, Reorganizations. Reorganization items also include adjustments to reflect the carrying value of liabilities subject to compromise (LSTC) at their estimated allowed claim amounts, as such adjustments are determined. The following table presents reorganization items incurred ~~since~~in the ~~Petition~~year ~~Date~~ended December 31, 2015 and the post-petition period ended December 31, 2014 as reported in the statements of consolidated income (loss):

	Post-Petition Period Through December 31, 2014
	Year Ended December 31, 2015			Post-Petition Period Ended December 31, 2014
Loss on exchange and settlement of EFIH First Lien Notes (Note 6)	$	108
Expenses related to legal advisory and representation services	$	111		$	50
Fees associated with completion of EFIH DIP Facility	94
Expenses related to other professional consulting and advisory services	30			15
Expenses related to legal advisory and representation services	50
Noncash adjustment for estimated allowed claims relate to debt (Note 9)	(89		)	—
Expenses related to other professional consulting and advisory services	15
Noncash adjustments for allowed claims related to affiliates (Notes 2 and 12)	(7		)	—
Total reorganization items	$	267
Loss on exchange and settlement of EFIH First Lien Notes (Note 6)	—			108
Fees associated with EFIH Second Lien Notes repayment and completion of the DIP Facility	28			94
Total reorganization items	$	73		$	267

8. LIABILITIES SUBJECT TO COMPROMISE

The amounts classified as liabilities subject to compromise (LSTC) reflect the company's estimate of pre-petition liabilities and other expected allowed claims to be addressed in the Chapter 11 Cases and may be subject to future adjustment as the Chapter 11 Cases proceed. Debt amounts include related unamortized deferred financing costs, discounts or premiums. The following table presents LSTC as reported in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2014:

	December 31, 2014
Notes, loans and other debt per the following table	$	3,843
Accrued interest on notes, loans and other debt	138
Advances and other payables to affiliates	7
Total liabilities subject to compromise	$	3,988


8.	DEBTOR-IN-POSSESSION BORROWING FACILITIES

The DIP Facility, EFIH First Lien Notes Settlement and EFIH Second Lien Notes Repayment — The Bankruptcy Court approved the DIP Facility in June 2014. The DIP Facility provides for a $5.4 billion first-lien debtor-in-possession financing facility. Since inception, the facility has been utilized as follows:

•

In June 2014, $1.836 billion of loans issued under the facility were issued as an exchange to holders of $1.673 billion principal amount of EFIH First Lien Notes plus accrued and unpaid interest totaling $78 million. Holders of substantially all of the principal amount exchanged received as payment in full a principal amount of loans under the DIP facility equal to 105% of the principal amount of the notes held plus 101% of the accrued and unpaid interest at the non-default rate on such principal;


•	In June 2014, $2.438 billion of cash borrowings were used to repay all remaining $2.312 billion principal amount of EFIH First Lien Notes (plus accrued and unpaid interest totaling $128 million);


•	In March 2015, $750 million of cash borrowings were used to repay $445 million principal amount of EFIH Second Lien Notes, accrued and unpaid pre-petition interest of $55 million and post-petition interest of $235 million and certain fees (see Note 9), and


•	In December 2015, $36 million was used to reduce the principal balance of the EFIH Toggle Notes as a result of the Bankruptcy Court approving certain charging lien advances related to pre-petition debt of EFIH.

The exchange and settlement of the EFIH First Lien Notes in 2014 resulted in a loss of $108 million, reported in reorganization items, which represents the excess of the principal amounts of debt issued, cash repayments and deferred financing costs associated with the exchanged and settled debt over the carrying value of the exchanged and settled debt and related accrued interest.

As of December 31, 2015, remaining cash on hand from borrowings under the DIP Facility, net of fees, totaled approximately $354 million, which was held as cash and cash equivalents. In the December 31, 2015 consolidated balance sheet, the borrowings under the DIP Facility are reported as current liabilities since the maturity date of the facility is June 2016. In January 2016, the Debtors paid a $13.5 million extension fee to extend the maturity date of the DIP Facility to December 2016. The terms of the DIP Facility were otherwise unchanged. The DIP Facility must be repaid in full prior to the EFIH Debtors emergence from the Chapter 11 Cases.

The principal amounts outstanding under the DIP Facility bear interest based on applicable LIBOR rates, subject to a 1% floor, plus 3.25%. At both December 31, 2015 and 2014, outstanding borrowings under the DIP Facility totaled $5.4 billion at an annual interest rate of 4.25%. The DIP Facility is a non-amortizing loan that may, subject to certain limitations, be voluntarily prepaid by the EFIH Debtors, in whole or in part, without any premium or penalty.

The EFIH DIP Facility will mature on the earlier of (a) the effective date of any reorganization plan, (b) upon the event of the sale of substantially all of EFIH's assets or (c) December 2016.

EFIH's obligations under the DIP Facility are secured by a first lien covering substantially all of EFIH's assets, rights and properties, subject to certain exceptions set forth in the DIP Facility. The DIP Facility provides that all obligations thereunder constitute administrative expenses in the Chapter 11 Cases, with administrative priority and senior secured status under the Bankruptcy Code and, subject to certain exceptions set forth in the DIP Facility, will have priority over any and all administrative expense claims, unsecured claims and costs and expenses in the Chapter 11 Cases.

The DIP Facility provides for affirmative and negative covenants applicable to EFIH and EFIH Finance, including affirmative covenants requiring EFIH and EFIH Finance to provide financial information, budgets and other information to the agents under the DIP Facility, and negative covenants restricting EFIH's and EFIH Finance's ability to incur additional indebtedness, grant liens, dispose of assets, pay dividends or take certain other actions, in each case except as permitted in the DIP Facility. The DIP Facility also includes a minimum liquidity covenant pursuant to which EFIH cannot allow the amount of its unrestricted cash (as defined in the DIP Facility) to be less than $150 million. As of December 31, 2015, EFIH was in compliance with this minimum liquidity covenant. The Oncor Ring-Fenced Entities are not restricted subsidiaries for purposes of the DIP Facility.

The DIP Facility provides for certain customary events of default, including events of default resulting from non-payment of principal, interest or other amounts when due, material breaches of representations and warranties, material breaches of covenants in the DIP Facility or ancillary loan documents, cross-defaults under other agreements or instruments and the entry of material judgments against EFIH. Upon the existence of an event of default, the EFIH DIP Facility provides that all principal, interest and other amounts due thereunder will become immediately due and payable, either automatically or at the election of specified lenders.

The DIP Facility permits, subject to certain terms, conditions and limitations set forth in the DIP Facility, EFIH to incur incremental junior lien subordinated debt in an aggregate amount not to exceed $3 billion.


9.	LIABILITIES SUBJECT TO COMPROMISE

The amounts classified as liabilities subject to compromise (LSTC) reflect the company's estimate of pre-petition liabilities and other expected allowed claims to be addressed in the Chapter 11 Cases and may be subject to future adjustment as the Chapter 11 Cases proceed. Prior to December 31, 2015, debt amounts include related unamortized deferred financing costs, discounts or premiums. The following table presents LSTC as reported in the consolidated balance sheets at December 31, 2015 and 2014:



	December 31,
	2015		2014
Notes, loans and other debt per the following table	$	3,273	$	3,843
Accrued interest on notes, loans and other debt	81		138
Advances and other payables to affiliates	—		7
Total liabilities subject to compromise	$	3,354	$	3,988

Pre-Petition Notes, Loans and Other Debt Reported as Liabilities Subject to Compromise

Amounts ~~reported~~presented below ~~as of December 31, 2014~~ represent principal amounts of pre-petition notes, loans and other debt reported as liabilities subject to compromise. ~~Amounts~~ reported below as of December 31, 2013 represent notes, loans and other debt reported as current liabilities in EFIH's consolidated balance sheets. All pre-petition notes, loans and other debt outstanding as of December 31, 2014 are classified as LSTC.

	December 31,
	2014			2013
	2015			2014
Debt issued by EFIH:
6.875% Fixed Senior Secured First Lien Notes due August 15, 2017 (a)	$	—		$	503
11% Fixed Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due October 1, 2021	$	322		$	406
10% Fixed Senior Secured First Lien Notes due December 1, 2020 (a)	—			3,482
11.75% Fixed Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due March 1, 2022	1,389			1,750
11% Fixed Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due October 1, 2021	406			406
11.25%/12.25% Senior Toggle Notes due December 1, 2018	1,530			1,566
11.75% Fixed Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due March 1, 2022	1,750			1,750
11.25%/12.25% Senior Toggle Notes due December 1, 2018	1,566			1,566
9.75% Fixed Senior Notes due October 15, 2019	2			2
Unamortized premium	243			284
Unamortized premium (a)	—			243
Unamortized discount	(121		)	(146		)
Unamortized discount (a)	—			(121		)
Total debt issued by EFIH	3,~~846~~243			73,~~847~~846
Pushed down debt (b):
10.875% EFH Corp. Fixed Senior Notes due November 1, 2017	17			17
11.25%/12.00% EFH Corp. Senior Toggle Notes due November 1, 2017	13			13
Total pushed down debt	30			30
Deferred debt issuance costs (c)	(33		)	—
Deferred debt issuance costs (a)	—			(33		)
Total debt	$	3,~~843~~273		$	73,~~877~~843

________________

(a) ~~The~~Due to the Settlement Agreement approved by the Bankruptcy Court in December 2015, EFIH's ~~First~~pre-petition ~~Lien~~notes, ~~Notes~~loans and other debt reported as liabilities subject to compromise were ~~exchanged~~updated orto ~~settled~~reflect its expected allowed claim amounts, resulting in ~~June~~the ~~2014~~write-off to reorganization items of unamortized deferred debt issuance, premiums and discounts classified as LSTC (see Note 67).


(b)	Represents 50% of the amount of these EFH Corp. securities guaranteed by EFIH and pushed down per the discussion below under "Guarantees and Push Down of EFH Corp. Debt."

~~(c) Deferred debt issuance costs were reported in other noncurrent assets at December 31, 2013.~~55

Repayment of EFIH Second Lien Notes

In March 2015, with the approval of the Bankruptcy Court, EFIH used some of its cash to repay (Repayment) $735 million, including interest at contractual rates, in amounts outstanding under EFIH's pre-petition 11.00% Fixed Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due October 1, 2021 (11.00% Notes) and 11.75% Fixed Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due March 1, 2022 (11.75% Notes). The ~~and~~Repayment resulted in an $1584 million reduction in ~~certain~~the ~~fees~~principal ~~and~~amount ~~expenses~~ of the ~~trustee~~11.00% ~~for~~Notes, ~~such~~a ~~notes~~$361 million reduction in the principal amount of the 11.75% Notes and the payment of $235 million and $55 million of accrued and unpaid post-petition and pre-petition interest, respectively, at contractual rates. The Repayment required the requisite consent of the lenders under ~~its~~the ~~EFIH~~ DIP Facility. EFIH received such consent from approximately 97% of the lenders under the ~~EFIH~~ DIP Facility ~~and~~in ~~paid~~consideration of an aggregate consent fee equal to approximately $13 million~~. As~~ aand ~~result~~$15 ofmillion ~~the~~in ~~Repayment,~~certain asfees ofand ~~the~~expenses ~~date~~of ~~hereof,~~ the ~~principal~~trustee ~~amount~~for ~~outstanding~~such ~~on the 11~~notes.~~00%~~ ~~Notes and 11.75% are $322 million and $1.388 billion, respectively.~~

~~Debt~~Charging ~~Related~~Lien ~~Activity in 2013~~Advances

~~Principal~~In ~~amounts~~December of2015, ~~debt issued in~~ the ~~year~~Bankruptcy ~~ended~~Court ~~December 31,~~approved ~~2013~~certain ~~totaled~~charging ~~$1.564~~lien ~~billion. These~~advances ~~issuances~~related ~~consisted~~to ofpre-petition ~~$1.302~~debt ~~billion~~ of EFIH. Pursuant ~~10%~~to ~~Notes~~those ~~issued~~charging inlien ~~exchanges~~advances, asthe ~~discussed~~Debtors ~~below,~~paid approximately $~~173~~36 million ofto ~~EFIH~~reduce ~~Toggle Notes issued though~~ the ~~PIK~~principal ~~election~~balance ~~in lieu~~ of ~~making~~the ~~cash~~EFIH ~~interest~~Toggle ~~payments,~~Notes and paid $892 million ~~of EFIH Toggle Notes issued~~ in ~~debt~~pre-petition ~~exchanges as discussed below~~interest.

EFIH Debt Exchanges and Distributions Involving EFH Corp. Debt — In exchanges in January 2013, EFIH and EFIH Finance issued $1.302 billion principal amount of EFIH 10% Senior Secured Notes due 2020 (New EFIH 10% Notes) in exchange for $1.310 billion total principal amount of EFH Corp. and EFIH senior secured notes consisting of: (i) $113 million principal amount of EFH Corp. 9.75% Senior Secured Notes due 2019 (EFH Corp. 9.75% Notes), (ii) $1.058 billion principal amount of EFH Corp. 10% Senior Secured Notes due 2020 (EFH Corp. 10% Notes), and (iii) $139 million principal amount of EFIH 9.75% Senior Secured Notes due 2019 (EFIH 9.75% Notes). The New EFIH 10% Notes had terms and conditions substantially the same as the existing EFIH 10% Notes discussed below. EFIH cancelled the EFIH notes it received in the exchanges.

In connection with these debt exchange transactions, EFH Corp. received the requisite consents from holders of the EFH Corp. 9.75% Notes and EFH Corp. 10% Notes and EFIH received the requisite consents from holders of the EFIH 9.75% Notes to certain amendments to the respective indentures governing such notes. These amendments, among other things, (i) eliminated EFIH's pledge of its 100% ownership of the membership interests it owns in Oncor Holdings as collateral for the EFIH 9.75% Notes, (ii) made EFCH and EFIH unrestricted subsidiaries under the EFH Corp. 9.75% Notes and EFH Corp. 10% Notes, thereby eliminating EFCH's unsecured and EFIH's secured guarantees of the notes, (iii) eliminated substantially all of the restrictive covenants in the indentures and (iv) eliminated certain events of default, modified covenants regarding mergers and consolidations and modified or eliminated certain other provisions in these indentures.

In additional exchanges in January 2013, EFIH and EFIH Finance issued $89 million principal amount of additional 11.25%/12.25% Toggle Notes due 2018 (EFIH Toggle Notes) in exchange for $95 million total principal amount of EFH Corp. senior notes consisting of: (i) $31 million principal amount of EFH Corp. 10.875% Senior Notes due 2017 (EFH Corp. 10.875% Notes), (ii) $33 million principal amount of EFH Corp. 11.25%/12.00% Senior Toggle Notes due 2017 (EFH Corp. Toggle Notes), (iii) $2 million principal amount of EFH Corp. 5.55% Series P Notes due 2014 (EFH Corp. 5.55% Notes) and (iv) $29 million principal amount of EFH Corp. 6.50% Series Q Notes due 2024 (EFH Corp. 6.50% Notes). The additional EFIH Toggle Notes have the same terms and conditions as the existing EFIH Toggle Notes discussed below.

In the first quarter of 2013, EFIH distributed to EFH Corp. $6.360 billion principal amount of EFH Corp. debt that it previously received in debt exchanges, including $1.235 billion received in January 2013. EFH Corp. cancelled the notes, leaving $1.361 billion principal amount of affiliate debt still held by EFIH. The distribution included $3.474 billion principal amount of EFH Corp. Toggle Notes, $1.715 billion principal amount of EFH Corp. 10.875% Notes, $1.058 billion principal amount of EFH Corp. 10% Notes and $113 million principal amount of EFH Corp. 9.75% Notes.

Accounting and Income Tax Effects of the January 2013 Debt Exchanges — In consideration of the circumstances and terms of the exchanges, accounting rules require that the net loss on the exchanges, which totaled $21 million, be deferred and amortized to interest expense over the life of the debt issued. The deferred loss is reported as debt discount associated with the EFIH 10% Notes and EFIH Toggle Notes. The deferred loss and the related deferred tax liability were pushed down to EFIH as a membership interests transaction.

Guarantees and Push Down of EFH Corp. Debt

Pre-petition debt guaranteed and subject to push down at December 31, ~~2014~~2015 totals $60 million and consists of $33 million principal amount of EFH Corp. 10.875% Notes and $27 million principal amount of EFH Corp. Toggle Notes. The amount reflected in EFIH's consolidated balance sheets as pushed down pre-petition debt ($30 million at both December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, as shown in the debt table above) represents 50% of the principal amount of the EFH Corp. Merger-related debt guaranteed. This percentage reflects the fact that at the time of the Merger, the equity investments of EFCH and EFIH in their respective operating subsidiaries were essentially equal amounts. Because payment of principal and interest on the debt is the responsibility of EFH Corp., EFIH records the settlement of such amounts as noncash capital contributions from EFH Corp.

There were no payments of interest by EFH Corp. on pre-petition debt pushed down for the ~~year~~years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. EFH Corp. payments of interest on debt pushed down totaled $23 million, ~~and $53 million~~ for the ~~years~~year ended December 31, 2013~~,and 2012, respectively~~.

The following table presents an analysis of the total outstanding principal amount of EFH Corp. debt guaranteed by EFCH and EFIH at December 31, 2012, December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

	December 31, 2012
Securities Guaranteed (principal amounts)	Held by EFIH		Subject to Push Down		Not Merger-Related		Total Guaranteed		Debt Cancelled in 2013 (c)		Total Guaranteed December 31, 2013 and 2014 (d)
EFH Corp. 9.75% Senior Notes (a)	$	—	$	115	$	—	$	115	$	113	$	—
EFH Corp. 10% Senior Notes (a)	—		661		400		1,061		1,058		—
EFH Corp. 10.875% Senior Notes	1,685		64		—		1,749		1,715		33
EFH Corp. 11.25%/12.00% Senior Toggle Notes	3,441		60		—		3,501		3,474		27
Subtotal	$	5,126	$	900	$	400	6,426		$	6,360	60
TCEH Demand Notes (b)							698				—
Total							$	7,124			$	60

________________

(a) As a result of transactions completed in the first quarter 2013, as discussed above, the guarantees of the EFH Corp. 9.75% Notes and EFH Corp. 10% Notes were eliminated.

(b) The TCEH Demand Notes were settled in January 2013. See Note 12.

(d) These amounts are subject to push down.

Information Regarding Significant Pre-Petition Debt

EFIH 6.875% Senior Secured First Lien Notes — There were no principal amounts of the EFIH 6.875% Notes outstanding at December 31, ~~2014~~2015 as the notes were exchanged or settled in June 2014 as discussed in Note 68. The notes bore interest at a fixed rate of 6.875% per annum. The EFIH 6.875% Notes were secured on a first-priority basis by EFIH's pledge of its 100% ownership of the membership interests in Oncor Holdings (the EFIH Collateral) on an equal and ratable basis with the EFIH 10% Notes (discussed below).

EFIH 10% Senior Secured First Lien Notes — There were no principal amounts of the EFIH 10% Notes outstanding at December 31, ~~2014~~2015 as the notes were exchanged or settled in June 2014 as discussed in Note 68. The notes bore interest at a fixed rate of 10% per annum. The notes were secured by the EFIH Collateral on an equal and ratable basis with the EFIH 6.875% Notes.

EFIH 11% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes — The principal amount of the EFIH 11% Notes totals $~~406~~322 million with interest at a fixed rate of 11% per annum. The EFIH 11% Notes are secured on a second-priority basis by the EFIH Collateral on an equal and ratable basis with the EFIH 11.75% Notes. See discussion above related to the repayment of a portion of these notes in March 2015.

The EFIH 11% Notes are senior obligations of EFIH and EFIH Finance and rank equally in right of payment with all senior indebtedness of EFIH and are effectively senior in right of payment to all existing or future unsecured debt of EFIH to the extent of the value of the EFIH Collateral. The notes have substantially the same terms as the EFIH 11.75% Notes discussed below, and the holders of the EFIH 11% Notes will generally vote as a single class with the holders of the EFIH 11.75% Notes.

EFIH 11.75% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes — The principal amount of the EFIH 11.75% Notes totals $1.~~750~~389 billion with interest at a fixed rate of 11.75% per annum. The EFIH 11.75% Notes are secured on a second-priority basis by the EFIH Collateral on an equal and ratable basis with the EFIH 11% Notes. The EFIH 11.75% Notes have substantially the same covenants as the EFIH 11% Notes, and the holders of the EFIH 11.75% Notes will generally vote as a single class with the holders of the EFIH 11% Notes. See discussion above related to the repayment of a portion of these notes in March 2015.

The EFIH 11.75% Notes were issued in private placements and are not registered under the Securities Act. EFIH had agreed to use its commercially reasonable efforts to register with the SEC notes having substantially identical terms as the EFIH 11.75% Notes (except for provisions relating to transfer restrictions and payment of additional interest) as part of an offer to exchange freely tradable notes for the EFIH 11.75% Notes. Because the exchange offer was not completed, the annual interest rate on the EFIH 11.75% Notes increased by 25 basis points (to 12.00%) on February 6, 2013 and by an additional 25 basis points (to 12.25%) on May 6, 2013.

55EFIH 11.25%/12.25% Senior Toggle Notes — The principal amount of the EFIH Toggle Notes totals $1.53 billion with interest at a fixed rate of 11.25% per annum for cash interest and 12.25% per annum for PIK Interest. The terms of the Toggle Notes include an election by EFIH, for any interest period until June 1, 2016, to pay interest on the Toggle Notes (i) entirely in cash; (ii) by increasing the principal amount of the notes or by issuing new EFIH Toggle Notes (PIK Interest); or (iii) 50% in cash and 50% in PIK Interest. EFIH made its pre-petition interest payments on the EFIH Toggle Notes by using the PIK feature of those notes.

EFIH 11.25%/12.25% Senior Toggle Notes — The principal amount of the EFIH Toggle Notes totals $1.566 billion with interest at a fixed rate of 11.25% per annum for cash interest and 12.25% per annum for PIK Interest. The terms of the Toggle Notes include an election by EFIH, for any interest period until June 1, 2016, to pay interest on the Toggle Notes (i) entirely in cash; (ii) by increasing the principal amount of the notes or by issuing new EFIH Toggle Notes (PIK Interest); or (iii) 50% in cash and 50% in PIK Interest. EFIH made its pre-petition interest payments on the EFIH Toggle Notes by using the PIK feature of those notes.

The EFIH Toggle Notes were issued in private placements and are not registered under the Securities Act. EFIH had agreed to use its commercially reasonable efforts to register with the SEC notes having substantially identical terms as the EFIH Toggle Notes (except for provisions relating to transfer restrictions and payment of additional interest) as part of an offer to exchange freely tradable notes for the EFIH Toggle Notes. Because the exchange offer was not completed, the annual interest rate on the EFIH Toggle Notes increased by 25 basis points (to 11.50%) in December 2013 and by an additional 25 basis points (to 11.75%) in March 2014.

Material Cross Default/Acceleration Provisions — Certain of EFIH's pre-petition financing arrangements contain provisions that result in an event of default if there were a failure under other financing arrangements to meet payment terms or to observe other covenants that could or does result in an acceleration of payments due. Such provisions are referred to as cross default or cross acceleration provisions. The Bankruptcy Filing triggered defaults on EFIH's pre-petition debt obligations, but pursuant to the Bankruptcy Code, the creditors are stayed from taking any actions against the Debtors as a result of such defaults.

EFIH Collateral Trust Agreement — EFIH entered into a Collateral Trust Agreement, among EFIH, ~~The~~Delaware ~~Bank of New York Mellon~~ Trust Company, ~~N.A.,~~ as First Lien Successor Trustee, the other Secured Debt Representatives named therein and the Collateral Trustee. The Collateral Trust Agreement governing the pledge of collateral generally provides that the holders of a majority of the debt secured by a first priority lien on the collateral, including the notes and other future debt incurred by EFH or EFIH secured by the collateral equally and ratably, have, subject to certain limited exceptions, the exclusive right to manage, perform and enforce the terms of the security documents securing the rights of secured debt holders in the collateral, and to exercise and enforce all privileges, rights and remedies thereunder.

5657

9. INTEREST EXPENSE AND RELATED CHARGES

	Year Ended December 31,
	2014			2013			2012
Interest expense on debtor-in-possession financing	$	125		$	—		$	—
Interest expense on pre-petition debt	267			630			434
Interest expense related to pushed down debt	1			6			75
Interest expense on pre-petition toggle notes payable in additional principal (Note 8)	65			176			12
Amortization of debt exchange premiums	(24		)	(80		)	(8		)
Amortization of debt exchange discounts and issuance costs	7			28			13
Total interest expense and related charges	$	441		$	760		$	526

Interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2014 reflects interest paid and accrued on debtor-in-possession financing and interest expense on pre-petition debt up to the Petition Date (See Note 6).

The Bankruptcy Code generally restricts payment of interest on pre-petition debt, subject to certain exceptions. However, the Bankruptcy Court ordered the payment of post-petition interest payments on EFIH First Lien Notes in connection with the settlement discussed in Note 6. Other than these amounts ordered by the Bankruptcy Court, effective April 29, 2014, EFIH discontinued recording interest expense on outstanding pre-petition debt classified as liabilities subject to compromise (LSTC). Interest expense as calculated under the contractual terms of EFIH's pre-petition debt, all of which is subject to compromise, would have totaled $363 million for the post-petition period through December 31, 2014. This amount exceeded actual interest expense recorded, which represented $54 million in interest since the Bankruptcy Filing, by $309 million.


10.	COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Guarantees

See Note 89 for discussion of EFIH's guarantees of certain EFH Corp. debt.

Legal Proceedings

From time to time, EFIH may be involved in various legal and administrative proceedings in the normal course of business, the ultimate resolutions of which, in the opinion of management, should not have a material effect upon its financial condition, results of operations or liquidity.

Make-whole Claims — In May 2014, the indenture trustee for the EFIH 10% First Lien Notes initiated litigation in the Bankruptcy Court seeking, among other things, a declaratory judgment that EFIH is obligated to pay a make-whole premium in connection with the cash repayment of the EFIH First Lien Notes discussed in Note 68 and that such make-whole premium is an allowed secured claim, or in the alternative, an allowed secured or unsecured claim for breach of contract (EFIH First Lien Make-whole Claims). The indenture trustee has alleged that the EFIH First Lien Make-whole Claims are valued at approximately $432 million plus reimbursement of expenses. In ~~Following~~separate ~~argument~~rulings in March and ~~briefing~~July on2015, ~~cross~~the ~~motions~~Bankruptcy ~~for~~Court ~~summary~~found ~~judgment,~~that inno ~~March~~make-whole premium is due with respect to the EFIH 10% First Lien Notes. In July 2015, the indenture trustee appealed the Bankruptcy Court's ~~issued~~ruling ato ~~ruling~~the ~~and~~United ~~order~~States inDistrict ~~favor~~Court offor the ~~EFIH~~District ~~Debtors~~of onDelaware ~~almost~~and ~~all~~in ~~issues,~~February ~~including~~2016 ~~denying~~that court affirmed the ~~indenture~~Bankruptcy ~~trustee~~Court's ~~motion~~rulings. In ~~for~~February ~~summary~~2016, ~~judgment~~the inIndenture ~~full~~Trustee ~~and~~appealed ~~granting~~ the ~~EFIH~~District ~~Debtors~~Court's ~~summary~~ruling ~~judgment~~to onthe ~~most~~Third ~~counts~~Circuit Court of Appeals. The ~~remaining~~EFIH ~~open~~Debtors ~~issues~~intend ~~are~~to ~~currently~~vigorously ~~scheduled~~defend toagainst bethis ~~heard~~appeal. EFIH atcannot apredict ~~trial~~the ~~beginning~~outcome onof ~~April~~this ~~20, 2015~~appeal.

57In June 2014, the indenture trustee for the EFIH Second Lien Notes initiated litigation in the Bankruptcy Court seeking similar relief with respect to the EFIH Second Lien Notes, including among other things, that EFIH is obligated to pay a make-whole premium in connection with any repayment of the EFIH Second Lien Notes and that such make-whole premium would be an allowed secured claim, or in the alternative, an allowed secured or unsecured claim for breach of contract (the EFIH Second Lien Make-whole Claims). If, as of December 31, 2015, the EFIH Second Lien Make-whole Claims were allowed, the amount of such claims would have been approximately $401 million plus reimbursement of expenses. In October 2015, the Bankruptcy Court issued a ruling and order in favor of the EFIH Debtors. The order and ruling found that no make-whole premium is due with respect to the EFIH Second Lien Notes. In November 2015, the indenture trustee appealed the Bankruptcy Court's ruling to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Briefing is complete, but oral argument has not yet been scheduled. The EFIH Debtors intend to vigorously defend against this appeal. EFIH cannot predict the outcome of this appeal.

In ~~June~~December 2014, the ~~indenture trustee for the~~ EFIH ~~Second~~Debtors ~~Lien Notes~~ initiated litigation inagainst the ~~Bankruptcy~~indenture ~~Court~~trustee ~~seeking~~for ~~similar relief with respect to~~ the EFIH ~~Second~~PIK ~~Lien~~ Notes seeking, ~~including~~ among other things, a declaratory judgment that EFIH is not obligated to pay a redemption or make-whole premium in connection with ~~any~~the cash repayment of the EFIH ~~Second~~PIK ~~Lien~~ Notes and that ~~such~~any ~~make~~post-~~whole~~petition ~~premium~~interest ~~would~~owing beon anthese ~~allowed~~notes ~~secured~~is ~~claim~~to (be paid at the ~~EFIH~~statutory ~~Second~~Federal ~~Lien~~Judgment ~~Make-whole~~Rate ~~Claims)~~of interest. In June 2015, the ~~EFIH~~Bankruptcy ~~Second~~Court ~~Lien~~issued ~~Make-whole~~an ~~Claims,~~opinion asand ofentered ~~December 31~~an order dismissing the EFIH Debtors' adversary proceeding. However, ~~2014~~in its opinion, the ~~amount~~Bankruptcy ofCourt ~~such~~noted ~~claims~~that ~~alleged~~as ~~would~~an ~~have~~alternative ~~been~~the ~~equal~~EFIH Debtors may file a claim objection to ~~approximately~~the ~~$591~~EFIH ~~million~~PIK ~~plus~~noteholders' ~~reimbursement~~claims ofmade ~~expenses~~in the Chapter 11 Cases. In ~~December~~July ~~2014~~2015, the EFIH Debtors filed ~~counterclaims~~a claim objection with the Bankruptcy Court regarding the EFIH PIK noteholders' claims for ~~relief~~a ~~against~~redemption premium and post-petition interest at the ~~Second~~contract ~~Lien~~rate ~~indenture~~under ~~trustee,~~the ~~seeking~~EFIH ~~declaratory~~PIK ~~relief~~Notes. In ~~that~~October 2015, ~~among~~the ~~other~~Bankruptcy ~~things,~~Court ~~EFIH~~issued isopinions ~~not~~in ~~obligated~~favor toof ~~pay~~the aEFIH Debtors. One opinion found that no make-whole premium inis ~~connection~~due with ~~any~~respect ~~repayment~~to of the EFIH ~~Second~~PIK ~~Lien~~ Notes. The ~~and~~second opinion found that ~~such~~the ~~make-whole~~EFIH ~~premium~~PIK noteholders' allowed claim does not, ifas ~~owing~~a matter of law, ~~would~~include ~~not~~post-petition ~~constitute~~interest anwhether ~~allowed~~at ~~secured~~the ~~claim~~contract ~~(EFIH~~rate ~~Second~~or ~~Lien~~the ~~Counterclaims)~~Federal Judgment Rate. InThis ~~December~~opinion ~~2014~~did find, ~~the~~however, ~~indenture~~that, ~~trustee~~in ~~for~~connection with the ~~EFIH~~confirmation ~~Second~~of ~~Lien~~a ~~Notes~~Plan ~~opposed~~of Reorganization, the ~~EFIH~~Bankruptcy ~~Debtors'~~Court ~~motion~~could, toat ~~assert~~its discretion, grant post-petition interest as part of the EFIH ~~Second~~PIK ~~Lien~~noteholders' ~~Counterclaims~~allowed claim under general principals of equity and ~~also~~that ~~moved~~such togrant ~~dismiss~~could ~~its~~be ~~own~~at ~~complaint~~the ~~for~~contract ~~relief~~rate, ~~arguing~~the ~~that~~Federal itJudgment ~~was~~Rate noor ~~longer~~any ~~necessary~~other toamount ~~resolve~~that the ~~EFIH~~Bankruptcy ~~Second~~Court ~~Lien~~determines ~~Make-whole~~to ~~Claims~~be ~~given~~equitable. In ~~that~~November 2015, a majority of the EFIH ~~Debtors~~PIK ~~had~~Noteholders ~~withdrawn~~settled their ~~motion~~claims tocontingent ~~repay~~on the ~~EFIH~~Plan ~~Second~~of ~~Lien~~Reorganization ~~Notes~~becoming effective. ~~However,~~These assettling anoteholders ~~result~~have appealed both of ~~EFIH’~~the Bankruptcy Court's ~~partial~~rulings ~~repayment~~to the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. Those appeals have been stayed, and if the ~~EFIH~~Plan ~~Second~~of ~~Lien~~Reorganization ~~Notes~~becomes effective, those appeals will likely be moot. If the ~~parties~~Plan of Reorganization does not become effective, those appeals may be revived. Some EFIH PIK Noteholders have ~~agreed~~not ~~that~~settled their claims. They have appealed the ~~litigation~~Bankruptcy isCourt's ~~ripe~~ruling on post-petition interest to the United States District Court for ~~adjudication~~the District of Delaware. ~~The~~That ~~parties~~appeal ~~are~~has ~~currently~~also ~~working~~been ~~together~~stayed. The onnon-settling aEFIH ~~schedule~~PIK toNoteholders ~~propose~~have also sought to be awarded post-petition interest through an equitable proceeding suggested by the Bankruptcy Court’s insecond ~~order~~opinion. No briefing schedule has been set for that equitable proceeding. The EFIH Debtors intend to ~~adjudicate~~vigorously ~~this~~defend ~~matter~~against the award of post-petition interest at a rate higher than the Federal Judgment Rate. EFIH cannot predict the outcome of either these appeals or any equitable proceeding seeking the award of post-petition interest.

In December 2014, the EFIH Debtors initiated litigation against the indenture trustee for the EFIH PIK Notes seeking, among other things, a declaratory judgment that EFIH is not obligated to pay a make-whole premium in connection with the cash repayment of the EFIH PIK Notes and that any post-petition interest owing on these notes is to be paid at the statutory Federal Judgment Rate of interest. The indenture trustee for the EFIH PIK Notes filed a motion in February 2015 to dismiss the EFIH Debtors' complaint for declaratory relief, and the EFIH Debtors filed a brief in opposition to that motion in February 2015. If a make-whole claim was allowed, as of December 31, 2014, such claims would be approximately $100 million. The Bankruptcy Court has not yet announced a schedule for hearing argument or ruling on the indenture trustee's motion to dismiss.

In addition, creditors may make additional claims in the Chapter 11 Cases for make-whole or redemption premiums in connection with repayments or settlement of other pre-petition debt. These claims could be material. There can be no assurance regarding the outcome of any of the litigation regarding the validity or, if deemed valid, the amount of these make-whole or redemption claims.

Potential Inter/Intra Debtor Claims

In August 2014, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order in the Chapter 11 Cases establishing discovery procedures governing, among other things, certain prepetition transactions among the various Debtors' estates. In February 2015, the ad hoc committee of certain TCEH unsecured noteholders; the official committee representing unsecured interests at EFCH and its direct subsidiary, TCEH; and the official committee representing unsecured interests at EFH and EFIH filed motions with the Bankruptcy Court seeking standing to prosecute derivative claims on behalf of TCEH relating to certain of these prepetition transactions. These motions are currently scheduled to be heard by the Bankruptcy Court at the Debtors' omnibus hearing in April 2015. In addition to the claims described above, certain of the Debtors (or creditors purporting to act derivatively in the name of a Debtor) may bring additional inter-Debtor or intra-Debtor claims (including claims under the Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement among EFH Corp. and certain of its subsidiaries under which TCEH and EFH Corp. have previously filed claims in the Chapter 11 Cases) that could be material in amount. EFIH cannot predict the timing or outcome of future proceedings, if any, related to these transactions. The outcome of any of these claims could be material and could affect the results of operation, liquidity or financial condition of a particular Debtor.

Potential Inter/Intra Debtor Claims — In August 2014, the Bankruptcy Court entered an order in the Chapter 11 Cases establishing discovery procedures governing, among other things, certain prepetition transactions among the various Debtors' estates. In February 2015, the ad hoc group of TCEH unsecured creditors; the official committee representing unsecured interests at EFCH and its direct subsidiary, TCEH; and the official committee representing unsecured interests at EFH and EFIH filed motions with the Bankruptcy Court seeking standing to prosecute derivative claims on behalf of TCEH relating to certain of these prepetition transactions. These claims were released effective when the Bankruptcy Court approved the Settlement Agreement.

The Settlement Agreement was approved in December 2015 and is expected to remain effective even if the Plan of Reorganization does not become effective.


11.	MEMBERSHIP INTERESTS

Cash Distributions

In January 2013, EFIH's board of directors declared, and EFIH paid, a cash distribution to EFH Corp. of $680 million (which as of December 31, 2012 was recorded as restricted cash), which was used by EFH Corp. to settle the TCEH Demand Notes (see Note 12).

In February 2012, EFIH's board of directors declared, and EFIH paid, a cash distribution to EFH Corp. of $950 million, which was used by EFH Corp. to partially settle the TCEH Demand Notes. EFIH did not declare or pay any cash distributions for the year ended December 31, 2012.

Distribution Restrictions

The agreement governing the ~~EFIH DIP~~ Facility generally restricts EFIH's ability to make distributions or loans to any of its parent companies or their subsidiaries unless such distributions or loans are expressly permitted under the agreement governing such facility.

Under applicable law, EFIH is prohibited from paying any dividend to the extent that immediately following payment of such dividend, there would be no statutory surplus or EFIH would be insolvent. In addition, due to the Chapter 11 Cases, no dividends are eligible to be paid without the approval of the Bankruptcy Court.

Noncash Distributions to EFH Corp.

See Notes 89 and "Affiliate Debt Held by EFIH" below for details of debt securities EFIH acquired in debt exchange transactions in December 2012 and January 2013 and securities returned to EFH Corp. The indentures governing EFIH's debt do not limit its ability to dividend EFH Corp. debt securities to EFH Corp. so long as EFIH received such securities in exchange for the issuance of EFIH debt.

Equity Interests in Oncor

At December 31, ~~2014~~2015, ownership of Oncor's membership interests was as follows: 80.03% held indirectly by EFH Corp., 0.22% held indirectly by Oncor's management and board of directors and 19.75% held by Texas Transmission.

Capital Contributions

See Notes 1 and 89 for discussion of noncash contributions from EFH Corp. related to debt pushed down to EFIH in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 5-J.

Affiliate Debt Held by EFIH

AsThe aamounts ~~result~~ of affiliate debt ~~exchanges~~held inby ~~2009~~EFIH ~~through~~were ~~2013,~~eliminated ~~EFIH~~as ~~held~~a ~~debt~~result ~~securities~~ of ~~EFH~~the ~~Corp.~~Settlement ~~and~~Agreement ~~TCEH~~approved asby ~~presented~~the inBankruptcy ~~the~~Court ~~table~~in ~~below~~December 2015. InThe ~~December~~elimination ~~2012, management determined that some or all~~ of ~~these~~affiliate ~~securities~~debt ~~may~~created bea ~~returned~~$635 asmillion ~~dividends~~pretax toloss ~~EFH~~for ~~Corp.; accordingly~~EFIH, ~~the~~which ~~balances~~was ~~were~~recorded ~~reclassified~~within ~~at that time from investment in debt of affiliates and reported as a reduction of~~ membership interests. The ~~securities~~affiliate ~~are~~debt noelimination ~~longer~~also ~~marked-to-market. Interest~~created ~~income~~$222 ismillion noof ~~longer~~federal ~~accrued~~related ~~and~~income ~~interest~~tax ~~received~~NOLs, ~~reduces~~which ~~the~~were ~~carrying~~recorded ~~value~~to ~~of the securities and thus increases~~ membership interests~~. Interest~~, ~~received~~and inwere ~~2013~~fully ~~totaled~~reserved ~~$252~~with ~~million. As~~ a ~~result~~valuation ofallowance ~~the~~since ~~Bankruptcy~~it ~~Filing,~~is ~~EFIH~~more ~~does~~likely than not ~~expect~~that tothe ~~receive~~benefit ~~further~~from ~~interest~~the ~~payments~~NOLs onwill ~~affiliate~~not ~~debt~~be itrealized ~~holds~~(See Note 5).

~~Prior~~As toa ~~December~~result ~~2012,~~of ~~when the~~ debt ~~securities~~exchanges ~~were reported as investment~~ in ~~debt~~2009 ofthrough ~~affiliates~~2013, ~~the~~EFIH ~~securities~~held ~~were~~debt ~~classified~~securities asof ~~available~~EFH ~~for~~Corp. ~~sale,~~and ~~interest~~TCEH ~~was~~as ~~recorded~~presented in the ~~income~~table ~~statement~~below. Interest asreceived ~~interest~~in ~~income~~2013 ~~and~~totaled ~~unrealized~~$252 ~~gains~~million. As ora ~~losses~~result ~~were~~of ~~recorded~~the inChapter ~~other~~11 ~~comprehensive~~Cases ~~income~~and ~~unless~~the ~~such~~Settlement ~~losses~~Agreement, ~~were~~EFIH ~~other~~did ~~than~~not ~~temporary,~~receive ininterest ~~which~~payments ~~case~~on ~~they~~affiliate ~~were~~debt ~~recorded~~it asheld ~~impairments~~after ~~in net income~~2013.

In the first quarter 2013, EFIH distributed to EFH Corp. $6.360 billion principal amount ($5.778 billion carrying amount) of EFH Corp. debt that it previously received in debt exchanges, leaving $1.361 billion principal amount of affiliate debt still held by EFIH. EFH Corp. cancelled the notes. The $6.360 billion principal amount consisted of $5.125 billion of debt held at December 31, 2012 and $1.235 billion (of the $1.266 billion) received in debt exchanges in January 2013 (see Note 8). The distribution included $1.715 billion principal amount of EFH Corp. 10.875% Notes, $3.474 billion principal amount of EFH Corp. Toggle Notes, $1.058 billion principal amount of EFH Corp. 10% Notes and $113 million principal amount of EFH Corp. 9.75% Notes.

In the fourth quarter 2012, EFIH distributed to EFH Corp. $158 million principal amount ($160 million carrying amount) of EFH Corp. debt that it previously received in debt exchanges. EFH Corp. cancelled the notes. The distribution included $119 million principal amount of EFH Corp. Toggle Notes and $39 million principal amount of EFH 10.875% Notes.

The principal amounts, coupon rates, maturities and carrying value of debt of affiliates held at both December 31, 2014 and 2013 are as follows:

	Principal Amount		Carrying Value
EFH Corp. 5.55% Fixed Senior Notes Series P due November 15, 2014	$	281	$	185
EFH Corp. 6.50% Fixed Senior Notes Series Q due November 15, 2024	545		249
EFH Corp. 6.55% Fixed Senior Notes Series R due November 15, 2034	456		194
TCEH 10.25% Fixed Senior Notes due November 1, 2015 (both periods include $48 million principal amount of Series B Notes)	79		7
Balance reported as reduction in membership interests	$	1,361	$	635

In 2013, as a result of the distribution of all the EFH Corp. 10.875% Notes and EFH Corp. Toggle Notes EFIH held, EFIH recorded a gain of $284 million (pretax) representing the reclassification to interest income of mark-to-market gains previously recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI).

The indentures governing the EFIH Notes do not limit EFIH's ability to distribute the EFH Corp. debt securities that it holds to EFH Corp. so long as it received such securities in exchange for the issuance of EFIH debt, which applies to all the EFH Corp. debt EFIH currently holds.

Impairments — In 2012, EFIH deemed the declines in values of the TCEH securities were other than temporary and recorded a $14 million impairment, which is reported as a reduction of interest income. EFIH considered that the securities were in a loss position for an extended period and the effects of low wholesale power prices on the profitability and cash flows of TCEH (which has below investment grade credit ratings) were unlikely to reverse in the near term.

Prior to December 2012, the debt securities were reported as investment in affiliate debt and EFIH determined value under the fair value hierarchy established in accounting standards. Under the fair value hierarchy, Level 2 valuations are based on prices that reflect observable market information, such as actual trade information of similar securities, adjusted for observable differences. The fair value of EFIH's investment in debt of affiliates was estimated at the lesser of either the call price or the market value as determined by broker quotes and quoted market prices for similar securities in active markets. For the periods presented, the fair values of EFIH's investment in debt of affiliates represented Level 2 valuations.

At December 31, 2015, no affiliate debt was held by EFIH. The principal amounts, coupon rates, maturities and carrying value of debt of affiliates held at December 31, 2014 are as follows:



	Principal Amount		Carrying Value
EFH Corp. 5.55% Fixed Senior Notes Series P due November 15, 2014	$	281	$	185
EFH Corp. 6.50% Fixed Senior Notes Series Q due November 15, 2024	545		249
EFH Corp. 6.55% Fixed Senior Notes Series R due November 15, 2034	456		194
TCEH 10.25% Fixed Senior Notes due November 1, 2015 (includes $48 million principal amount of Series B Notes)	79		7
Balance reported as reduction in membership interests	$	1,361	$	635

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)

The following table presents the changes to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2015.



	Dedesignated Cash Flow Hedges - Oncor			Pension and Other Postretirement Employee Benefit Liabilities Adjustments - Oncor			Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance at December 31, 2014	$	(19	)	$	(67	)	$	(86	)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications (after tax)	—			(7		)	(7		)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and reported in:
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries	1			1			2
Total amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) during the period	1			1			2
Total change during the period	1			(6		)	(5		)
Balance at December 31, 2015	$	(18	)	$	(73	)	$	(91	)

The following table presents the changes to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2014.

	Dedesignated Cash Flow Hedges - Oncor			~~Changes~~Pension inand ~~Fair~~Other ~~Values~~Postretirement ofEmployee ~~Investment~~Benefit inLiabilities ~~Debt~~Adjustments ~~Securities~~- ~~of Affiliates~~Oncor			~~Pension~~Total ~~and~~Accumulated Other ~~Postretirement~~Comprehensive ~~Employee~~Income ~~Benefit Liabilities Adjustments - Oncor~~(Loss)			~~Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)~~
Balance at December 31, 2013	$	(21	)	$	—(18	)	$	(1839	)	$	~~(39~~	)
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications (after tax)	—			—(49		)	(49		)	~~(49~~		)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and reported in:
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries	2			—			—2			2
Total amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) during the period	2			—			—2			2
Total change during the period	2			—(49		)	(4947		)	~~(47~~		)
Balance at December 31, 2014	$	(19	)	$	—(67	)	$	(6786	)	$	~~(86~~	)

The following table presents the changes to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2013.

	Dedesignated Cash Flow Hedges - Oncor			Changes in Fair Values of Investment in Debt Securities of Affiliates			Pension and Other Postretirement Employee Benefit Liabilities Adjustments - Oncor			Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Balance at December 31, 2012	$	(23	)	$	185		$	(2	)	$	160
Other comprehensive loss before reclassifications (after tax)	—			—			(16		)	(16		)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and reported in:
Interest income	—			(284		)	—			(284		)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries	2			—			—			2
Income tax benefit	—			99			—			99
Total amount reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) during the period	2			(185		)	—			(183		)
Total change during the period	2			(185		)	(16		)	(199		)
Balance at December 31, 2013	$	(21	)	$	—		$	(18	)	$	(39	)


12.	RELATED–PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The following represent EFIH's significant related-party transactions. Also see Note 11 for a discussion of EFH Corp. and TCEH debt securities held by EFIH.

• EFH Corp. ~~allocates~~previously allocated expense to EFIH for management fees owed by EFH Corp. to the Sponsor Group. This expense, which is reported in SG&A expenses, totaled zero and $3 million for the ~~year~~years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. There was no allocation of fees to EFIH for the ~~years~~year ended December 31, 2013 ~~and 2012~~. Beginning with the quarterly management fee due December 31, 2013, the Sponsor Group, while reserving the right to receive the fees, directed EFH Corp. to suspend payments of the management fees for an indefinite period. ~~Accordingly, EFIH did not reimburse EFH Corp. for the allocated management fees.~~ Effective with the Petition Date, EFH Corp. suspended allocations of such fees to TCEH and EFIH. Fees accrued as of the Petition Date ~~have~~were ~~been~~ reclassified to liabilities subject to compromise (LSTC), and fees accrued after the Petition Date were reported in other noncurrent liabilities and deferred credits. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement approved by the Bankruptcy Court in December 2015, the management agreement has been terminated and the Sponsor Group has agreed to forego any and all claims under the management agreement in exchange for releases of alleged liabilities against the Debtors. As a result, EFIH adjusted the expected allowed claim and recognized a gain for the Sponsor Group's management agreement claim of $2 million, which is reported in EFIH's statement of consolidated income (loss) in reorganization items.

• In addition to amounts incurred directly by EFIH, a subsidiary of EFH Corp. allocates costs to EFIH for legal and other consulting services associated with EFIH's debt restructuring activities prior to the Petition Date, and EFIH reimburses the subsidiary for the allocated costs on a monthly basis. The allocated expense, which was reported in SG&A expenses up through the Petition Date, totaled $4 million and $12 million for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. ~~There~~ ~~was~~Beginning noat ~~allocation~~the ofPetition Date, legal and other consulting services ~~costs~~associated towith EFIH's ~~for~~Chapter ~~the~~11 ~~year~~Cases ~~ended~~were ~~December~~directly ~~31,~~billed ~~2012~~to EFIH and are reported in reorganization items.

A subsidiary of EFH Corp. bills EFIH for administrative services such as accounting and finance at cost, and EFIH reimburses the subsidiary for the allocated costs on a monthly basis. This expense, which is reported in SG&A expenses, totaled $45 million ~~for~~and ~~the~~$4 ~~year~~million ~~ended December 31, 2014. There was no allocation of administrative service costs to EFIH~~ for the years ended December 31, ~~2013~~2015 and ~~2012~~2014, respectively.

• EFH Corp. files consolidated federal income tax and Texas state margin tax returns, and under a Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement, allocates income taxes to EFIH substantially as if it were filing its own corporate income tax returns. At December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, EFIH had current income tax receivables from EFH Corp. totaling $~~125~~173 million and $~~110~~125 million, respectively, both of which were fully reserved (see Note 54). EFIH made no income tax payments to EFH Corp. for the ~~year~~years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. EFIH's income tax refunds from EFH Corp. totaled $5 million for the year ended December 31, 2013~~, and income tax payments to EFH Corp~~. ~~totaled $180 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.~~ See discussion below ~~in this Note~~ regarding allocation of income tax liabilities to Oncor Holdings and Oncor under the Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement.

•In AtJanuary ~~December 31~~2013, ~~2012~~fees paid to Goldman, ~~EFH~~Sachs ~~Corp~~& Co. ~~had~~(Goldman), ~~demand~~an ~~notes~~affiliate ~~payable~~of toGS ~~TCEH~~Capital ~~(TCEH~~Partners, ~~Demand~~for ~~Notes)~~services ~~totaling~~related to debt exchanges totaled $~~698~~2 million, ~~arising~~for ~~from~~the ~~borrowings~~following: (i) ~~used~~Goldman acted as a dealer manager for the offers by EFIH and EFIH Finance to ~~fund~~exchange new EFIH 10% Notes for EFH Corp. ~~debt~~9.75% ~~principal~~Notes, ~~and~~EFH ~~interest~~Corp. ~~payments~~10% Notes and ~~net~~EFIH ~~borrowings~~9.75% ~~for~~Notes ~~general~~(collectively, ~~corporate~~the ~~purposes.~~Old ~~EFIH~~Notes) ~~was~~and as a ~~guarantor~~solicitation ofagent ~~these~~in ~~demand~~the ~~notes.~~solicitation of consents by EFH Corp. ~~settled~~and ~~the~~EFIH ~~balance~~and ofEFIH Finance to amendments to the ~~TCEH~~Old ~~Demand~~Notes and indentures governing the Old Notes inand ~~January~~(ii) ~~2013~~Goldman ~~using~~acted as a dealer manager for the ~~cash~~offers ~~distribution~~by ~~from~~EFIH and EFIH ~~discussed~~Finance into ~~Note~~exchange 11EFIH Toggle Notes for EFH Corp. 10.875% Notes and EFH Corp. Toggle Notes.

•Affiliates ~~In January 2013, fees paid to Goldman, Sachs & Co. (Goldman), an affiliate~~ of ~~GS Capital Partners, for services related to debt exchanges totaled $2 million, described as follows: (i) Goldman acted as a dealer manager for~~ the ~~offers~~Sponsor byGroup ~~EFIH~~have ~~and~~sold ~~EFIH~~or ~~Finance to exchange new EFIH 10% Notes for EFH Corp. 9.75% Notes~~acquired, ~~EFH Corp. 10% Notes~~ and ~~EFIH 9.75% Notes (collectively, the Old Notes) and as a solicitation agent~~ in the ~~solicitation~~future ofmay ~~consents~~sell byor ~~EFH~~acquire, ~~Corp.~~debt ~~and~~or ~~EFIH~~debt ~~and~~securities ~~EFIH~~issued ~~Finance to amendments to the Old Notes and indentures governing the Old Notes and (ii) Goldman acted as a dealer manager for the offers~~ by EFIH ~~and~~in ~~EFIH~~open ~~Finance~~market totransactions ~~exchange~~or ~~EFIH~~through ~~Toggle~~loan ~~Notes for EFH Corp~~syndications. ~~10.875% Notes and EFH Corp. Toggle Notes. See Note 8 for further discussion of these exchange offers.~~

~~For~~See ~~the~~Note ~~year~~9 ~~ended~~regarding ~~December~~guarantees ~~31,~~and ~~2012, fees paid to Goldman related to debt issuances totaled $10 million, described as follows: (i) Goldman acted as a joint book~~push-~~running~~down ~~manager and initial purchaser in the February 2012 issuance~~ of ~~$1.15~~certain ~~billion~~EFH ~~principal amount of EFIH 11~~Corp.~~750%~~ ~~Notes for which it received fees totaling $7 million; and (ii) Goldman acted as joint book~~pre-~~running~~petition ~~manager~~debt and ~~initial~~Note ~~purchaser in the August 2012 issuance of $600 million principal amount of~~ 11~~.750%~~ ~~Notes~~regarding ~~and~~distributions ~~$250 million principal amount of EFIH 6.875% Notes for which it received fees totaling $3 million. In the October 2012 issuance of $253 million principal amount of EFIH 6.875% Notes~~to, ~~Goldman acted as joint book-running manager~~ and ~~initial~~contributions ~~purchaser for which it was paid $1 million. A broker-dealer affiliate of KKR served as a co-manager and initial purchaser and an affiliate of TPG served as an advisor in both of these transactions~~from, ~~for~~EFH ~~which they each received a total of $4 million~~Corp.

• Affiliates of the Sponsor Group have sold or acquired, and in the future may sell or acquire, debt or debt securities issued by EFIH in open market transactions or through loan syndications.

See Note 8 regarding guarantees and push-down of certain EFH Corp. pre-petition debt and Note 11 regarding distributions to, and contributions from, EFH Corp.

Significant related-party transactions between Oncor Holdings (including its consolidated subsidiary Oncor) and EFH Corp., other affiliates of EFH Corp. and the Sponsor Group are as follows:

• Oncor receives payments from subsidiaries of TCEH for services it provides, principally the delivery of electricity. Revenues recorded by Oncor for these services totaled approximately $1.0 billion for each of the years ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013. The fees are based on rates regulated by the PUCT that apply to all REPs. These revenues from subsidiaries of TCEH represented 25%, 2725% and 2927% of Oncor Holdings' operating revenues for the years ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~2012~~2013, respectively. Oncor Holdings' balance sheets at both December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 reflect receivables from affiliates totaling $118 million ~~and $135 million~~, ~~respectively,~~ consisting almost entirely of trade receivables from subsidiaries of TCEH related to these electricity delivery fees.

• InOncor ~~August~~pays ~~2012,~~EFH ~~TCEH~~Corp. ~~and~~subsidiaries ~~Oncor~~for ~~agreed~~financial toand ~~settle,~~other atadministrative aservices ~~discount,~~and ~~two~~shared ~~agreements~~facilities ~~related~~at tocost. ~~securitization~~Such ~~(transition)~~amounts ~~bonds~~increased ~~issued by~~ Oncor's ~~bankruptcy-remote~~reported ~~financing~~operation ~~subsidiary in 2003~~ and ~~2004~~maintenance toexpense ~~recover~~by ~~generation-related~~$19 ~~regulatory assets. Under the agreements~~million, ~~TCEH had been reimbursing Oncor as described immediately below. Under the settlement, TCEH paid, and Oncor received,~~ $~~159~~34 million ~~in cash. The settlement was executed by EFIH acquiring the right to reimbursement under the agreements from Oncor~~ and ~~then selling these rights for the same amount to TCEH. The transaction resulted in a decrease of approximately~~ $232 million ~~(after tax) in Oncor's membership interests in accordance with accounting rules~~ for ~~related party transactions. Accordingly,~~ the ~~transaction~~years ~~resulted~~ended inDecember a31, ~~decrease~~2015, of2014 ~~approximately~~and $12013, ~~million (reflecting EFIH's 80% interest in Oncor) in EFIH's investment in unconsolidated subsidiary with an offsetting decrease in equity~~respectively.

~~Oncor~~• ~~collects~~Under ~~transition~~Texas ~~surcharges~~regulatory ~~from~~provisions, ~~its~~the ~~customers~~trust tofund ~~recover~~for decommissioning the ~~transition~~Comanche ~~bond~~Peak ~~payment~~nuclear ~~obligations. Oncor~~generation facility (reported on TCEH's ~~incremental~~consolidated ~~income~~balance ~~taxes~~sheets) ~~related~~is tofunded ~~the~~by ~~transition~~a ~~surcharges~~delivery itfee ~~collects~~surcharge ~~had~~collected ~~been~~from ~~reimbursed~~REPs by ~~TCEH~~Oncor, ~~quarterly~~as ~~under~~collection aagent, ~~noninterest~~and ~~bearing~~remitted ~~note~~monthly ~~payable~~ to ~~Oncor~~TCEH. ~~that~~The ~~was~~delivery tofee ~~mature~~surcharges inremitted ~~2016.~~ to TCEH's ~~payments~~totaled on$17 million for both the ~~note~~years ~~prior~~ended toDecember ~~the~~31, ~~August~~2015 ~~2012~~and ~~settlement~~2014 ~~totaled~~and $2016 million for the year ended December 31, ~~2012~~2013.

Under an interest reimbursement agreement, TCEH had reimbursed Oncor on a monthly basis for interest expense on the transition bonds. The remaining interest to be paid through 2016 under the agreement totaled $53 million at the August 2012 settlement date. Only the monthly accrual of interest under this agreement was reported as a receivable by Oncor. This interest income prior to the August 2012 settlement totaled $16 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.

• Oncor pays EFH Corp. subsidiaries for financial and other administrative services and shared facilities at cost. Such amounts increased Oncor's reported operation and maintenance expense by $34 million, $32 million and $35 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

• Under Texas regulatory provisions, the trust fund for decommissioning the Comanche Peak nuclear generation facility (reported on TCEH's consolidated balance sheets) is funded by a delivery fee surcharge collected from REPs by Oncor, as collection agent, and remitted monthly to TCEH. The delivery fee surcharges remitted to TCEH totaled $17 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 and $16 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

•

EFH Corp. files a consolidated federal income tax return that includes Oncor Holdings' results. Oncor is not a member of EFH Corp.'s consolidated tax group, but EFH Corp.'s consolidated federal income tax return includes EFH Corp.'s portion of Oncor's results as a result of EFH Corp.'s equity ownership in Oncor. EFH Corp. also files a consolidated Texas state margin tax return that includes all of Oncor Holdings' and Oncor's results. However, under a Federal and State Income Tax Allocation Agreement, Oncor Holdings and Oncor record their federal income tax and Texas state margin taxes as if Oncor Holdings and Oncor were filing their own corporate income tax returns.

At December 31, ~~2014~~2015, Oncor Holdings had a net current receivable from EFH Corp. related to federal and state income taxes totaling $~~120~~87 million, ~~all~~$89 million of which related to Oncor. The $~~120~~89 million net receivable from EFH Corp. included a $~~144~~109 million federal income tax receivable offset by a $2420 million state margin tax payable. Additionally, at December 31, 2015, Oncor ~~has~~had a noncurrent tax receivable from EFH Corp. of $6465 million and a noncurrent tax payable to Oncor Holdings of $2 million. At December 31, ~~2013~~2014, Oncor Holdings had a net current ~~payable~~receivable tofrom EFH Corp. related to federal and state income taxes totaling $7120 million, all of which ~~includes~~related to Oncor. The $5120 million ~~payable~~net byreceivable ~~Oncor~~from EFH Corp. ~~Oncor's~~ ~~liability~~included ata ~~December 31,~~$144 ~~2013~~million ~~consists~~federal ofincome tax receivable offset by a $2324 million state margin tax payable. Additionally, ~~net~~Oncor ofhas ana ~~$18~~noncurrent ~~million~~tax ~~federal~~receivable ~~income~~from ~~tax~~EFH ~~receivable~~Corp. of $64 million.

For the year ended December 31, 2015, Oncor Holdings and Oncor made net federal and state income tax payments to EFH Corp. totaling $26 million and $132 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2014, Oncor Holdings and Oncor made net federal and state income tax payments to EFH Corp. totaling $24 million and $237 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2013, Oncor Holdings and Oncor made net federal and state income tax payments to EFH Corp. totaling $34 million and $90 million, respectively. The 2013 net payment included $33 million from Oncor related to the 1997 through 2002 IRS appeals settlement and a $10 million refund paid to Oncor related to the filing of amended Texas franchise tax returns for 1997 through 2001.

•

Oncor has requirements in place to assure adequate creditworthiness of any REP to support the REP's obligation to collect securitization bond-related (transition) charges on behalf of Oncor Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC. Under these requirements, and as a result of TCEH's credit rating being below investment grade, TCEH is required to post collateral support in an amount equal to estimated transition charges over specified time periods. Accordingly, at December 31, 2015 and 2014, TCEH had posted letters of credit and/or cash in the amount of $6 million and $9 million, respectively, for Oncor's benefit.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, Oncor Holdings and Oncor made net federal and state income tax payments to EFH Corp. totaling $24 million and $237 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2013, Oncor Holdings and Oncor made net federal and state income tax payments to EFH Corp. totaling $34 million and $90 million, respectively. The 2013 net payment included $33 million from Oncor related to the 1997 through 2002 IRS appeals settlement and a $10 million refund paid to Oncor related to the filing of amended Texas franchise tax returns for 1997 through 2001. For the year ended December 31, 2012, Oncor Holdings and Oncor made net federal and state income tax payments to EFH Corp. totaling $35 million and $3 million, respectively. The 2012 net payment included a $21 million federal income tax refund paid to Oncor Holdings.

• Oncor has requirements in place to assure adequate creditworthiness of any REP to support the REP's obligation to collect securitization bond-related (transition) charges on behalf of Oncor Electric Delivery Transition Bond Company LLC. Under these requirements, and as a result of TCEH's credit rating being below investment grade, TCEH is required to post collateral support in an amount equal to estimated transition charges over specified time periods. Accordingly, at both December 31, 2014 and 2013, TCEH had posted letters of credit and/or cash in the amount of $9 million for Oncor's benefit.

•

Oncor and Texas Holdings agreed to the terms of a stipulation with major interested parties to resolve all outstanding issues in the PUCT review related to the Merger. As part of this stipulation, TCEH would be required to post a letter of credit in an amount equal to $170 million to secure its payment obligations to Oncor in the event, which has not occurred, two or more rating agencies downgrade Oncor's credit rating below investment grade.


•	Affiliates of the Sponsor Group have (1) sold or acquired Oncor's debt or debt securities in open market transactions or through loan syndications, and (2) performed various financial advisory, dealer, commercial banking and investment banking services for Oncor and certain of its affiliates for which they have received customary fees and expenses.

•

Oncor has participated in plans sponsored by EFH Corp. that provide pension, health care and other retiree benefits. Accordingly, Oncor Holdings' consolidated financial statements have reflected allocations to Oncor of amounts related to these retiree benefit plans. In accordance with an agreement between EFH Corp. and Oncor, Oncor ceased participation in EFH Corp.'s OPEB plan effective July 1, 2014 and established its own OPEB plan for Oncor's eligible existing and future retirees and their dependents. Additionally, the Oncor plan participants include those former participants in the EFH Corp. OPEB plan whose employment included service with both Oncor (or a predecessor regulated electricity business) and EFH Corp.'s competitive businesses (split service participants). Under the agreement, EFH Corp. will retain the liability for split service participants' benefits related to their years of service with the competitive business. The methodology for OPEB cost allocations between EFH Corp. and Oncor has not changed, and the plan separation does not materially affect the net assets or cash flows of EFIH.

•

Until June 30, 2014, Oncor employees participated in a health and welfare benefit program offered by EFH Corp. In connection with Oncor establishing its own health and welfare benefits program, Oncor agreed to pay EFH Corp. $1 million to reimburse EFH Corp. for its increased costs of providing benefits under the EFH Corp. program as a result of Oncor's withdrawal and to compensate EFH Corp. for the administrative work related to the transition. This amount was paid in June 2014.

Oncor's retained liability under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) relates to the nonrecoverable portion of the unfunded obligation of EFH Corp.'s pension plan. InTCEH contributed $16 million and $20 million in December 2015 and the first quarter of 2014, ~~TCEH~~respectively, ~~contributed $20 million~~ to the EFH Corp. pension plan assets, resulting in the plan being fully funded as calculated under the provisions of ERISA.


13.	SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Fair Value of Debt

	December 31, 2014				December 31, 2013
	December 31, 2015				December 31, 2014
Debt:	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
Borrowings under debtor-in-possession credit facilities (Note 6)	$	5,400	$	5,400	$	—	$	—
Borrowings under debtor-in-possession credit facilities (Note 8)	$	5,400	$	5,393	$	5,400	$	5,400
Pre-petition notes, loans and other debt reported as liabilities subject to compromise (Note 8)	3,876		4,336		—		—
Pre-petition notes, loans and other debt (Note 8)	—		—		7,877		7,849

EFIH determines fair value in accordance with accounting standards, and at December 31, ~~2014~~2015, EFIH's fair value ~~for~~represents ~~debt and liabilities subject to compromise represent~~ Level 2 valuations. EFIH obtains security pricing from an independent party who uses broker quotes and third-party pricing services to determine fair values. Where relevant, these prices are validated through subscription services such as Bloomberg. The fair value estimates of EFIH's pre-petition notes, loans and other debt reported as liabilities subject to compromise have been excluded from the table above. As a result of EFIH's ongoing Chapter 11 Cases, obtaining the fair value estimates of its pre-petition debt subject to compromise as of December 31, 2015 is impractical, and the fair values will ultimately be decided through the Chapter 11 Cases.

Interest Income on Affiliate Securities — ~~EFIH~~In ~~holds debt securities of EFH Corp. and TCEH. Prior to December 2012~~2013, ~~when the debt securities were reported~~ as ~~investment~~a inresult ~~affiliate~~of ~~debt,~~ the ~~securities~~distribution ~~were~~of ~~classified~~all ~~as available for sale and interest was recorded in~~ the ~~income~~EFH ~~statement~~Corp. ~~as interest income~~10. In875% ~~December~~Notes ~~2012,~~and ~~management determined that some or all of these securities may be returned as dividends to~~ EFH Corp.; ~~accordingly,~~Toggle ~~the~~Notes ~~balances~~EFIH ~~were~~held, ~~reclassified~~EFIH atrecorded ~~that time from investment in affiliate debt and reported as~~ a ~~reduction~~gain of ~~membership~~$284 ~~interests. As~~million a(pretax) ~~result~~representing of the ~~December 2012~~ reclassification ofto ~~investment~~interest inincome ~~debt~~ of ~~affiliates~~ mark-to-market ~~membership~~gains ~~interests,~~previously ~~interest~~recorded ~~received~~ in ~~2013~~accumulated ~~reduced~~other ~~the~~comprehensive ~~carrying~~income ~~value of the securities and thus increased membership interests~~(AOCI). See Note 11.

	Year Ended December 31,
	2014		2013		2012
Available-for-sale securities:
Interest received/accrued	$	—	$	—	$	232
Accretion of purchase discount	—		—		92
PIK interest received/accrued related to EFH Corp. Toggle Notes	—		—		288
Mark-to-market gain reclassified from AOCI	—		284		—
Impairments related to issuer credit	—		—		(14		)
Total interest	$	—	$	284	$	598

Supplemental Cash Flow Information

	Year Ended December 31,
	2014			2013			2012
	2015			2014			2013
Cash payments (receipts) related to:
Interest paid	$	~~376~~526		$	~~619~~376		$	~~352~~619
Interest received on investments in debt of affiliates (net of tax) (a)	—			—			(184		)
Income taxes	—			—			(5		)
Income taxes	—			(5		)	180
Reorganization items (a)	126			38			—
Reorganization items (b)	38			—			—
Noncash investing and financing activities:
Receipt of additional EFH Corp. Toggle Notes in lieu of cash interest	—			—			344
Principal amount of toggle notes issued in lieu of cash interest (Note 9)	—			—			173
Principal amount of toggle notes issued in lieu of cash interest (Note 8)	—			173			—
Parent's payment of interest on pushed-down debt accounted for as a contribution of capital (net of tax) (Note 9)	—			—			23
Parent's payment of interest on pushed-down debt accounted for as a contribution of capital (net of tax) (Note 8) (c)	—			23			22
Reduction of debt pushed down from EFH Corp. (Note 9) (b)	—			—			(420		)
Reduction of debt pushed down from EFH Corp. (Note 8) (d)	—			(420		)	(282		)
Debt exchange transactions (c)	—			(85		)	14
Debt exchange transactions (e)	(85		)	14			457
Distribution to EFH Corp. of debt held as an investment (Note 11)	—			—			(5,778		)
Distribution to EFH Corp. of debt held as an investment (Note 11)	—			(5,778		)	160
Income tax on interest received on holdings of affiliate debt (Note 11)	—			—			(88		)
Income tax on interest received on holdings of affiliate debt (Note 11)	—			(88		)	—
Income tax adjustment related to AMT utilization (d)	3			—			—

____________

(a) ~~Interest~~Represents ~~received~~cash inpayments ~~2012~~for ~~reported~~legal asand another ~~increase~~professional services reported in ~~membership~~reorganization ~~interests~~items (See Note 117).

(b) ~~Represents~~For ~~cash~~the ~~payments~~year ~~for~~ended ~~legal~~December ~~and~~31, ~~other~~2013, ~~professional~~represents ~~services~~$838 ~~reported~~million inprincipal ~~reorganization~~amount ~~items~~of EFH Corp. debt exchanged (at 50%). See Note 7)8.

(c) ~~Reflects~~For ~~noncash~~the ~~settlement~~year ended December 31, 2014, represents $1.836 billion principal amount of ~~certain~~loans ~~income~~issued ~~taxes~~under ~~payable~~the ~~arising~~EFIH asDIP aFacility ~~result~~in excess of the ~~sale~~$1.673 billion principal amount of ~~noncontrolling~~EFIH ~~interests~~First Lien Notes exchanged and $78 million of related accrued interest. For the year ended December 31, 2013 represents, $1.302 billion of EFIH debt issued in ~~Oncor~~exchange for $1.310 billion of EFH Corp. and EFIH debt and $89 million of EFIH debt issued in exchange for $95 million of EFH Corp. debt. See Note 8

(d) ~~For~~Represents ~~the~~a ~~year~~reduction ~~ended~~to ~~December~~EFIH's ~~31,~~investment ~~2013,~~in ~~represents~~Oncor ~~$838~~Holdings ~~million~~due ~~principal~~to ~~amount~~an ofincome ~~EFH~~tax ~~Corp.~~adjustment ~~debt~~related ~~exchanged~~to ~~(at~~alternative ~~50%).~~minimum ~~For~~tax ~~the year ended December 31, 2012, represents $564 million principal amount of EFH Corp. debt exchanged~~ (~~at 50%~~AMT). ~~See~~utilization ~~Note~~by 8Oncor.

(e) For the year ended December 31, 2014, represents $1.836 billion principal amount of loans issued under the EFIH DIP Facility in excess of the $1.673 billion principal amount of EFIH First Lien Notes exchanged and $78 million of related accrued interest. For the year ended December 31, 2013 represents, $1.302 billion of EFIH debt issued in exchange for $1.310 billion of EFH Corp. and EFIH debt and $89 million of EFIH debt issued in exchange for $95 million of EFH Corp. debt. For the year ended December 31, 2012, represents $1.304 billion of EFIH debt issued in exchange for $1.761 billion of EFH Corp. debt. See Note 8.65


Item 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.


Item 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company has established disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission and, as such, is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of EFIH's management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the disclosure controls and procedures in effect at December 31, ~~2014~~2015. Based on the evaluation performed, EFIH's management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, concluded that ~~due to~~ the ~~material weakness in its internal controls over financial reporting related to accounting for deferred income taxes, as described below, the~~ disclosure controls and procedures were ~~not~~ effective ~~as of December 31, 2014~~. In light of the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting, management completed substantive procedures, including validating the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used for accounting for deferred income taxes, prior to filing this Form 10-K.

These additional procedures have allowed EFIH to conclude that, notwithstanding the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting related to accounting for deferred income taxes, the consolidated financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, EFIH's financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with GAAP. Additionally, no restatement of EFIH's previously issued consolidated financial statements was required.

ENERGY FUTURE INTERMEDIATE HOLDING COMPANY LLC

MANAGEMENT'S ANNUAL REPORT ON

INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The management of Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) for the company. Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC's internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in condition or the deterioration of compliance with procedures or policies.

The management of Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC performed an evaluation as of December 31, ~~2014~~2015 of the effectiveness of the company's internal control over financial reporting based on the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission's (COSO's) ~~2013~~ Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013). Based on the review performed, management believes that ~~due~~as toof aDecember ~~material weakness in accounting for deferred income taxes~~31, ~~as described below~~2015, Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC's internal control over external financial reporting was ~~not~~ effective ~~as of December 31, 2014~~. In light of the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting, management completed additional substantive procedures, including validating the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used for accounting for deferred income taxes, prior to filing this Form 10-K. These additional procedures have allowed EFIH to conclude that, notwithstanding the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting, the consolidated financial statements included in this report fairly present, in all material respects, EFIH's financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with GAAP.

The principal factors contributing to the material weakness in accounting for deferred income taxes were as follows:

• the significant complexity created as a result of recently resolving numerous open tax years with the IRS (including 1997 to 2007);

• constraints resulting from the significant time and effort required to be spent by EFIH's tax and other finance personnel in supporting the bankruptcy and restructuring activities; and

• turnover of key personnel in EFIH's tax department responsible for operating certain key controls.

Pursuant to SEC rules and regulations, a material weakness is “a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the registrant’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis”. As of December 31, 2014, the EFIH's management concluded it did not maintain effective controls over the completeness and accuracy of its accounting for deferred income taxes, which constitutes a material weakness. Specifically, there was incomplete underlying data and insufficient documentation used in the operation of its reconciliation of deferred tax balances. These deficiencies in the operating effectiveness of the controls diminished the precision in EFIH's reconciliation of its income tax provision and related deferred tax asset and liability accounts. None of these deficiencies resulted in any restatement of EFIH's previously issued consolidated financial statements, and as stated above, management has concluded that the consolidated financial statements in this report fairly present, in all material respects, EFIH’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with GAAP.

The independent registered public accounting firm of Deloitte & Touche LLP as auditors of the consolidated financial statements of Energy Future Holdings Corp. has issued an attestation report on Energy Future Holdings Corp.'s internal control over financial reporting.

Remediation ~~Plan~~of ~~for~~Prior ~~the~~ Material Weakness in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

EFIH ispreviously ~~developing~~disclosed ~~and~~in ~~implementing~~its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 a material weakness in its internal control over financial reporting related to accounting for deferred income taxes. During the year ended December 31, 2015, EFIH implemented a plan of remediation to strengthen its overall internal control over accounting for deferred income taxes. The remediation plan ~~will~~included ~~include~~ the following steps:

• enhancing the formality and rigor of review and documentation related to EFIH's deferred income tax reconciliation procedures;,

• implementing additional oversight and monitoring controls over EFIH's deferred income tax review processes that are designed to operate at a level of precision to detect an error resulting from a related control failure before it results in a material misstatement of its financial statements;, and

• ~~hiring~~increasing key ~~personnel~~resources in EFIH's tax department and further evaluating staffing levels to ensure the execution of timely and rigorous control procedures.

EFIH is committed to maintaining a strong internal control environment and believes that these remediation efforts will represent improvements in its controls. EFIH has started to implement these steps; however, some of these steps will take time to be fully integrated and confirmed to be effective and sustainable. Additional controls may also be required over time. Until the remediation steps set forth above are fully implemented and tested, the material weakness described above will continue to exist.66

Management has implemented and tested new and refined interim period controls and annual controls related to accounting for deferred income taxes. After completing its testing of the design and operating effectiveness of these new controls, EFIH concluded that it has remediated the previously identified material weakness as of December 31, 2015.

Changes to Internal Control over Financial Reporting

~~There~~Except ~~has~~for the changes described above, there have been no ~~change~~additional inchanges ~~the~~ EFIH's internal control over financial reporting during the most recently completed fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, its internal control over financial reporting. ~~EFIH will continue to report on changes to internal controls related to the material weakness in future periods.~~



/s/ JOHN F. YOUNG		/s/ PAUL M. KEGLEVIC
John F. Young, President and		Paul M. Keglevic, Executive Vice President,
Chief Executive		Chief Financial Officer and Co-Chief Restructuring Officer

~~March 31~~February 29, ~~2015~~2016

6867

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Member of Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC (Debtor-in-Possession)

Dallas, Texas

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC (a direct subsidiary of Energy Future Holdings Corp. ~~("EFH Corp."~~)) and subsidiaries (Debtor-in-Possession) (“EFIH”) as of December 31, ~~2014~~2015 based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. EFIH's management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on EFIH's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on ~~that~~the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company's principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company's board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations of internal control over financial reporting, including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

AIn ~~material~~our ~~weakness~~opinion isEFIH ahas ~~deficiency~~maintained, orin aall ~~combination~~material ~~of deficiencies~~respects, ineffective internal control over financial reporting, ~~such~~as ~~that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement~~ of ~~the~~December ~~company’s~~31, ~~annual~~2015, orbased ~~interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected~~ on ~~a timely basis. The following material weakness has been identified and included in management's assessment: management has identified a material weakness related to ineffective controls over~~ the ~~completeness~~criteria ~~and~~established ~~accuracy of accounting for deferred income taxes. Specifically, there was incomplete underlying data and insufficient documentation used~~ in ~~the~~Internal ~~operation~~Control of- ~~their~~Integrated ~~reconciliation~~Framework of(2013) ~~deferred~~issued ~~tax~~by ~~balances. This material weakness was considered in determining~~ the ~~nature,~~Committee ~~timing, and extent~~ of ~~audit~~Sponsoring ~~tests~~Organizations ~~applied in our audit~~ of the ~~consolidated~~Treadway ~~financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 of EFIH and this report does not affect our report on such financial statements~~Commission.

InWe ~~our~~have ~~opinion~~also audited, ~~because~~in ofaccordance with the ~~effect~~standards of the ~~material~~Public ~~weakness~~Company ~~identified~~Accounting ~~above~~Oversight onBoard (United States), the ~~achievement~~consolidated offinancial ~~the~~statements ~~objectives~~as of and for the ~~control~~year ~~criteria~~ended December 31, 2015 of EFIH ~~has~~and ~~not~~our ~~maintained~~report ~~effective~~dated ~~internal~~February ~~control~~29, ~~over~~2016 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial ~~reporting~~statements asand included explanatory paragraphs regarding (1) the voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of ~~December~~the ~~31,~~United ~~2014,~~States ~~based~~Bankruptcy onCode of Energy Future Holdings Corp. and the ~~criteria~~substantial ~~established~~majority inof ~~Internal~~its ~~Control~~subsidiaries (Debtor-in-Possession) ~~Integrated~~(including ~~Framework~~Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC) and (~~2013~~2) ~~issued~~substantial bydoubt about EFIH’s ability to continue as a going concern, which is contingent upon its ability to comply with the ~~Committee~~financial ofand ~~Sponsoring~~other ~~Organizations~~covenants contained in the DIP Facility, its ability to obtain new debtor in possession financing in the event the DIP Facility was to expire during the pendency of the ~~Treadway~~Chapter ~~Commission~~11 Cases, its ability to complete a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization in a timely manner, including obtaining applicable regulatory approvals required for such plan, and its ability to obtain any exit financing needed to implement such plan, among other factors.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2014 of EFIH and our report dated March 31, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements and included explanatory paragraphs regarding (1) the voluntary petitions for relief under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code of Energy Future Holdings Corp. and the substantial majority of its subsidiaries (Debtor-in-Possession) (including Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC) and (2) substantial doubt about EFIH’s ability to continue as a going concern, which is contingent upon its ability to comply with the financial and other covenants contained in the DIP Facilities, its ability to obtain new debtor in possession financing in the event the DIP Facilities were to expire during the pendency of the Chapter 11 Cases, its ability to complete a Chapter 11 plan of reorganization in a timely manner, including obtaining creditor and Bankruptcy Court approval of such plan as well as applicable regulatory approvals required for such plan, and its ability to obtain any exit financing needed to implement such plan, among other factors.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Dallas, Texas

~~March~~February 3129, ~~2015~~2016

7068


Item 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION

None.

7169

PART III.


Item 10.	MANAGERS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Managers

The names of EFIH's managers and information about them, as furnished by the managers themselves, are set forth below:

Name	Age	Served AsDirectorSince	Business Experience
Charles H. Cremens	61	2014	Charles H. Cremens has served as a Manager of EFIH since February 2014. He has 30 years experience restructuring public and private companies. He was Chief Executive Officer of Spirit Finance Corporation, Chief Executive Officer of Conseco Finance Corp., and President of WMF Group, Ltd., during their restructuring. Prior to those assignments, he was Chief Investment Officer of Beacon Properties Corp., President of Real Estate Investments at Aetna Inc. and held various executive management positions at the Bank of Boston. He is presently a director of U. S. Steel Canada Inc., ~~Patriot~~BluestemGroup ~~Coal~~Inc. ~~Corporation,~~(f/k/a Capmark Financial Group Inc.), ~~and~~Aspect ~~Specialty~~Software ~~Brands~~Inc., and Southcross Holdings, GP LLC. Within the last five years, he has served as a director for Patriot Coal Corporation, Tactical Holdings Operations, Inc., Conexant Systems, Inc., Kerzner International Resorts Inc., Intrawest Resorts Holdings, Inc., ~~General~~Specialty ~~Growth~~Brands ~~Properties~~Holdings, ~~Inc.~~LLC, and ~~Tactical~~General ~~Holdings~~Growth ~~Operations~~Properties, Inc.
Thomas D. Ferguson	6162	2011	Thomas D. Ferguson has served as a Manager of EFIH since January 2011. He is a Managing Director of Goldman, Sachs & Co., having joined the firm in 2002. Mr. Ferguson heads the asset management efforts for the merchant bank's U.S. real estate investment activities. Mr. Ferguson serves on the boards of EFH Corp., Oncor ~~Electric Delivery Company LLC~~ and Oncor ~~Electric Delivery~~ Holdings ~~Company LLC, and also serves on the board of Caribbean Fund 2005 and National Golf Properties~~. He formerly held board seats at Associated British Ports, the largest port company in the UK,; Carrix, one of the largest private container terminal operators in the world,; ~~as well as~~ Red de Carreteras, a toll road concessionaire in Mexico,; ~~and~~ American Golf; ~~and~~ Agriculture Company of America; Caribbean Fund 2005; and National Golf Properties.
Paul M. Keglevic	6162	2008	Paul M. Keglevic has served as a Manager of EFIH since July 2008. He was elected Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Co-Chief Restructuring Officer of EFH Corp., EFIH and EFCH in October 2013, having previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of EFH Corp., EFIH and EFCH from July 2008 to October 2013. Before joining EFH Corp., he was an audit partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers. Mr. Keglevic was PricewaterhouseCoopers' Utility Sector Leader from 2002 to 2008 and Clients and Sector Assurance Leader from 2007 to 2008. Mr. Keglevic also serves on the boards of EFCH, TCEH and Stellus Capital Corporation.
Kenneth Pontarelli	4445	2010	Kenneth Pontarelli has served as a Manager of EFIH since July 2010. He is a Managing Director of Goldman, Sachs & Co. in its Principal Investment Area. He transferred to the Principal Investment Area in 1999 and was promoted to Managing Director in 2004. Mr. Pontarelli also serves as a director of EFH Corp. and ~~Tervita~~Expro ~~Corporation~~International Group Ltd. During the past five years, he also served on the boards of Cobalt International Energy, L.P., CVR Energy, Inc., ~~Expro~~Tervita ~~International Group Ltd.~~Corporation, and Kinder Morgan, Inc.
John F. Young	5859	2008	John F. Young has served as a Manager of EFIH since July 2008. He was elected President and Chief Executive Officer of EFH Corp. in January 2008. He also has served as Chair, President and Chief Executive of EFIH and EFCH since July 2010, having previously served as President and Chief Executive of EFIH from July 2008 to July 2010 and EFCH from April 2008 to July 2010. Before joining EFH Corp., Mr. Young served in many leadership roles at Exelon Corporation from March 2003 to January 2008 including Executive Vice President of Finance and Markets and Chief Financial Officer of Exelon Corporation; President of Exelon Generation; and President and Chief Operating Officer of Exelon Power. Prior to joining Exelon Corporation, Mr. Young was Senior Vice President of Sierra Pacific Resources Corporation. Mr. Young is also a director of Baylor Scott&White Health Foundation Advisory Board, EFH Corp., EFCH, Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited, TCEH, and USAA.

7270

Kneeland Youngblood ~~(1)~~60 59 2012 Kneeland Youngblood has served as a Manager of EFIH since July 2012. He is a founding partner of Pharos Capital Group, a private equity firm that focuses on providing growth and expansion capital to businesses in business services and health care services. During the last five years, Mr. Youngblood served on the boards of Burger King Holdings, Inc., Gap Inc. and Starwood Hotels and Resorts Worldwide, Inc. He is a director of EFH Corp., Oncor, Oncor Holdings and Mallinckrodt public limited company and a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. He is also a director of Pace Holdings Corporation, a special purpose acquisition company.

_______________

(1) Member of Audit Committee.

There is no family relationship between any of the above-named managers.

Manager Qualifications

In July 2008, Paul M. Keglevic and John F. Young were elected to EFIH's board of managers (the Board). Kenneth Pontarelli joined the Board in July 2010. Thomas D. Ferguson joined the Board in January 2011. Kneeland Youngblood joined the Board in June 2012. Charles H. Cremens joined the Board in February 2014. Messrs. Ferguson and Pontarelli are collectively referred to as the "Sponsor Managers." Messrs. Cremens, Keglevic, Young, and Youngblood are collectively referred to as the "Non-Sponsor Managers."

When considering whether the Board's managers and nominees have the experience, qualifications, attributes and skills, taken as a whole, to enable the Board to satisfy its oversight responsibilities effectively in light of EFIH's business and structure, the Board focused primarily on the qualifications summarized in each of the Board member's biographical information set forth above. In addition, EFIH believes that each of its managers possesses high ethical standards, acts with integrity, and exercises careful judgment. Each is committed to employing his/her skills and abilities in the long-term interests of EFIH and its stakeholders. Finally, EFIH's managers are knowledgeable and experienced in business, governmental, and civic endeavors, further qualifying them for service as members of the Board.

The Sponsor Managers possess experience in owning and managing privately held enterprises and are familiar with corporate finance and strategic business planning activities of highly-leveraged companies such as EFIH. Collectively, the Sponsor Managers possess substantial expertise in advising and managing companies in segments of the energy industry, including, among others, power generation, oil and gas, and energy infrastructure and transportation.

Before joining EFH Corp. as President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Young held various senior management positions at other companies in the energy industry over twenty years, including, most recently, his role as Executive Vice President of Finance and Markets and Chief Financial Officer of Exelon Corporation.

Mr. Cremens has substantial experience in company restructurings having led Spirit Finance Corporation and Conseco Inc. through restructuring as President and Chief Executive Officer, and currently serves or has previously served as independent director of ~~seven~~ten companies during their restructuring. Mr. Keglevic has considerable financial and accounting knowledge and expertise. Before joining EFH Corp. as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, he held various senior management positions at PricewaterhouseCoopers, including, most recently, his roles as Utility Sector Leader and Clients and Sector Assurance Leader. Mr. Youngblood has served on numerous boards for large public companies, has extensive experience managing and advising companies in his capacity as a partner in a private equity firm (not affiliated with the Sponsor Group), is highly knowledgeable of federal and state political matters, and has served on the board of directors of the United States Enrichment Corporation, a company that contracts with the US Department of Energy to produce enriched uranium for use in nuclear power plants.

7371

Executive Officers

The names and information regarding EFIH's executive officers are set forth below:

Name of Officer	Age	Positions and OfficesPresently Held	Date First Electedto Present Offices	Business Experience(Preceding Five Years)
John F. Young	5859	President and Chief Executive Officer of EFH Corp.andChair, President and ChiefExecutive ofEFIH and EFCH	January 2008	John F. Young was elected President and Chief Executive Officer of EFH Corp. in January 2008. He also has served as Chair, President and Chief Executive of EFIH and EFCH since July 2010, having previously served as President and Chief Executive of EFIH from July 2008 to July 2010 and EFCH from April 2008 to July 2010. Before joining EFH Corp., Mr. Young served in many leadership roles at Exelon Corporation from March 2003 to January 2008, including Executive Vice President of Finance and Markets and Chief Financial Officer of Exelon Corporation; President of Exelon Generation; and President and Chief Operating Officer of Exelon Power. Prior to joining Exelon Corporation, Mr. Young was Senior Vice President of Sierra Pacific Resources Corporation.
Stacey H. Doré	4243	Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Co-Chief Restructuring Officer of EFH Corp., EFIH and EFCH	October 2013	Stacey H. Doré was elected Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Co-Chief Restructuring Officer of EFH Corp. and EFCH in October 2013 and EFIH in February 2014, having previously served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Co-Chief Restructuring Officer of EFIH from October 2013 to February 2014, Executive Vice President and General Counsel of EFH Corp. from February 2013 to October 2013 and EFCH from April 2013 to October 2013, and Senior Vice President and General Counsel of EFH Corp. from April 2012 to February 2013, and EFIH and EFCH from April 2012 to October 2013. Ms. Doré was Vice President and General Counsel of Luminant from November 2011 to March 2012, and Vice President and Associate General Counsel of EFH Corp. from July 2008 to November 2011. Prior to joining EFH Corp., she was an attorney at Vinson & Elkins LLP, where she engaged in a business litigation practice.
Paul M. Keglevic	6162	Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Co-Chief Restructuring Officer ofEFH Corp., EFIH and EFCH	October 2013	Paul M. Keglevic was elected Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Co-Chief Restructuring Officer of EFH Corp., EFIH and EFCH in October 2013 having previously served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of EFH Corp., EFIH and EFCH from July 2008 to October 2013. Before joining EFH Corp., he was an audit partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers. Mr. Keglevic was PricewaterhouseCoopers' Utility Sector Leader from 2002 to 2008 and Clients and Sector Assurance Leader from 2007 to 2008.

There is no family relationship between any of the above-named executive officers.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

The board of managers has not made a determination that the member of the audit committee is an "audit committee financial expert" as defined in SEC Regulation S-K Item 407(d)(5). The board of managers believes that the current member of the audit committee has requisite levels of financial literacy and financial sophistication to enable the audit committee to be effective in relation to the Committee's purposes and in light of the scope and nature of the company’s business and financial statements.

Procedures for Nominating Managers

The Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of EFIH requires that vacancies on the Board be filled by the remaining managers, or, if there be none, by the sole member, EFH Corp.

7572


Item 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

EFIH does not have any employees and is managed by certain executive officers of its parent company, EFH Corp. The executive officers of EFH Corp. are compensated solely and directly by EFH Corp., with no amounts allocated to EFIH, and all decisions as to the compensation of its executive officers are made by the EFH Corp. Organization and Compensation Committee. The Board of Managers of EFIH does not have a compensation committee. For a full discussion of the compensation awarded to John F. Young, EFIH’s President and Chief Executive ~~Officer~~, Paul M. Keglevic, EFIH’s Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Co-Chief Restructuring Officer, and Stacey H. Doré, EFIH’s Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Co-Chief Restructuring Officer, collectively ~~our~~EFIH's named executive officers (“Named Executive Officers”) for the fiscal year ending December 31, ~~2014~~2015, please see ~~our~~its parent EFH Corp.’s ~~10K~~Form10-K on file at www.sec.gov and on EFH Corp.’s website at www.energyfutureholdings.com under the “Investor Relations” tab.

Compensation Committee Report

EFIH does not have a compensation committee. Therefore, its full Board of Managers ~~recommends~~has approved that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in EFIH’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Board of Managers

Charles H. Cremens

Thomas D. Ferguson

Paul M. Keglevic

Kenneth Pontarelli

John F. Young

Kneeland Youngblood

Summary Compensation Table

Pursuant to the SEC's executive compensation disclosure rules, a required table may be omitted if there has been no compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to any named executive officer that is required to be reported in that table. Therefore, we have not included a Summary Compensation Table or any other table regarding compensation paid to our Named Executive Officers.

7673

Director Compensation

The table below sets forth information regarding the aggregate compensation earned by or paid to the members of the Board during the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015. Managers who are members of the EFH Corp. Board and are not members of the Sponsor Group (or their respective affiliates) receive compensation for their service as members of the EFH Corp. Board and do not receive additional compensation for service on this Board. Officers of EFIH or members or officers of the Sponsor Group (or their respective affiliates) do not receive any fees for service as a manager.

Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)		~~Stock Awards ($)~~	Stock Awards ($)	~~Total ($)~~	Total ($)
Charles H. Cremens(1)	~~$236,389~~	$485,000	—	—	~~$236,389~~		$485,000
Thomas D. Ferguson (2)	—		—	—	—	—
Paul M. Keglevic (3)	—		—	—	—	—
Jeffrey Liaw (2)	—		—		—
Kenneth Pontarelli (2)	—			—		—
Kenneth Pontarelli (2)	—		—		—
John F. Young (3)	—			—		—
John F. Young (3)	—		—		—
Kneeland Youngblood (4)		$144,028		—			$144,028
Kneeland Youngblood (4)	—		—		—

_______________

(1) ~~Mr.~~Disinterested ~~Cremens,~~managers ~~the disinterested manager~~ on ~~our~~EFIH's Board, ~~receives~~receive an annual retainer of $200,000~~, which was pro-rated in 2014 for Mr~~. ~~Cremens because he joined our board in February of 2014.~~ In recognition of the additional responsibilities he performs in his role as a disinterested manager on the Board of Managers of EFIH, weEFIH ~~pay~~pays him an additional $7,500 per day for days substantially spent on matters related to our restructuring.

(2) Member or officer of the Sponsor Group (or their respective affiliates). ~~Mr. Liaw resigned from the Board effective January 22, 2015.~~


(3)	Officer of EFIH

(4) See the Directors Compensation Table in the EFH Corp. Form 10-K for compensation paid to Mr. Youngblood for his services as an EFH. Corp. director. Mr. Youngblood also receives an annual retainer of $170,000, paid quarterly in advance, for his service on the Oncor and Oncor Holdings boards, which was prorated for him joining the boards on February 25, 2015.


Item 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED EQUITY HOLDER MATTERS

EFIH is a wholly owned subsidiary of EFH Corp. and as a result, does not have compensation plans (including individual compensation arrangements) under which its equity securities are authorized for issuance.

Beneficial Ownership of Membership Interests of Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC

EFIH is a wholly owned subsidiary of EFH Corp. As such, EFH Corp. is the beneficial owner of 100% of ~~EFIH's~~its membership interests and neither of its directors nor the executive officers of its parent, EFH Corp., beneficially own any membership interests of EFIH as of ~~March~~February 1, ~~2014~~2016. The following table lists the percentage of limited liability company interests of EFIH beneficially owned by each manager and certain executive officers of EFIH and the holders of more than 5% of EFIH’s limited liability company interests as of ~~March~~February 1, ~~2014~~2016.

The amounts and percentages of limited liability interests of EFIH beneficially owned are reported on the basis of SEC regulations governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under SEC rules, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares voting power or investment power, which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Securities that can be so acquired are deemed to be outstanding for purposes of computing such person’s ownership percentage, but not for purposes of computing any other person’s percentage. Under these rules, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same securities, and a person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of securities as to which such person has no economic interest.

Name	Percentage Ownership
Energy Future Holdings Corp.	100.00%
Charles H. Cremens	0.00%
Thomas D. Ferguson	0.00%
Paul M. Keglevic	0.00%
Kenneth Pontarelli	0.00%
John F. Young	0.00%
Kneeland Youngblood	0.00%
Stacey H. Doré	0.00%
All owners, managers and current executive officers as a group (8 persons)	100.00%



Name	Percentage Ownership
Energy Future Holdings Corp.	100.00%
Charles H. Cremens	0.00%
Stacey H. Doré	0.00%
Thomas D. Ferguson	0.00%
Paul M. Keglevic	0.00%
Kenneth Pontarelli	0.00%
John F. Young	0.00%
Kneeland Youngblood	0.00%
All owners, managers and current executive officers as a group (8 persons)	100.00%


Item 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND MANAGER INDEPENDENCE

Policies and Procedures Relating to Related Party Transactions

The Board of Directors (the “Board”) of EFH Corp., EFIH’s parent company, has adopted a related person transactions policy. Under this policy, a related person transaction shall be consummated or shall continue only if:


1.	the Audit Committee of the Board approves or ratifies such transaction in accordance with the policy and determines that the transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in arm's length dealings with an unrelated third party;


2.	the transaction is approved by the disinterested members of the Board or the Executive Committee of the Board; or


3.	the transaction involves compensation approved by the Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board.

For purposes of this policy, the term "related person" includes EFH Corp.'s directors, executive officers, 5% shareholders and their immediate family members. "Immediate family members" means any child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse, sibling, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law or sister-in-law or any person (other than a tenant or employee) sharing the household of a director, executive officer or 5% shareholder.

A "related person transaction" is a transaction between EFH Corp. or its subsidiaries and a related person, other than the types of transactions described below, which are deemed to be pre-approved by the Audit Committee of the Board:


1.	any compensation paid to a director if the compensation is required to be reported under Item 402 of Regulation S-K of the Securities Act;


2.	any transaction with another company at which a related person's only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer), director or beneficial owner of less than 10% of that company's ownership interests;


3.	any charitable contribution, grant or endowment by EFH Corp. to a charitable organization, foundation or university at which a related person's only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer) or director;


4.	transactions where the related person's interest arises solely from the ownership of EFH Corp.'s equity securities and all holders of that class of equity securities received the same benefit on a pro rata basis;


5.	transactions involving a related party where the rates or charges involved are determined by competitive bids;


6.	any transaction with a related party involving the rendering of services as a common or contract carrier, or public utility, as rates or charges fixed in conformity with law or governmental authority;


7.	any transaction with a related party involving services as a bank depositary of funds, transfer agent, registrar, trustee under a trust indenture, or similar service;


8.	transactions available to all employees or customers generally (unless required to be disclosed under Item 404 of Regulation S-K of the Securities Act, if applicable);


9.	transactions involving less than $100,000 when aggregated with all similar transactions;


10.	transactions between EFH Corp. and its subsidiaries or between subsidiaries of EFH Corp.;


11.	transactions not required to be disclosed under Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act of 1933, and


12.	open market purchases of EFH Corp.'s or its subsidiaries' debt or equity securities and interest payments on such debt.

The Board has determined that it is appropriate for the Audit Committee of the Board to review and approve or ratify related person transactions. Accordingly, at least annually, management reviews related person transactions to be entered into, or previously entered into, by EFH Corp. or its subsidiaries, if any. After review, the Audit Committee of the Board approves, ratifies or disapproves such transactions. Management updates the Audit Committee of the Board as to any material changes to such related person transactions. In unusual circumstances, EFH Corp. or its subsidiaries may enter into related person transactions in advance of receiving approval, provided that such related person transactions are reviewed as soon as reasonably practicable by the Audit Committee of the Board. If the Audit Committee of the Board determines not to ratify such transactions, EFH Corp. makes all reasonable efforts to cancel or otherwise terminate the affected transactions.

The related person transactions described below were approved prior to the Board's adoption of this policy, but were approved by either the Board or its Executive Committee. Transactions described below under "Related Person Transactions - Transactions with Sponsor Affiliates" are not related person transactions under the EFH Corp. policy because they are not with a director, executive officer, 5% shareholder or any of their immediate family members, but are described in the interest of greater disclosure.

Related Person Transactions

Limited Partnership Agreement of Texas Energy Future Holdings Limited Partnership; Limited Liability Company Agreement of Texas Energy Future Capital Holdings LLC

The Sponsor Group and certain investors who agreed to co-invest with the Sponsor Group or through a vehicle jointly controlled by the Sponsor Group to provide equity financing for the Merger (Co-Investors) entered into (i) a limited partnership agreement (LP Agreement) in respect of EFIH’s indirect parent company, Texas Holdings and (ii) the LLC Agreement in respect of Texas Holdings' sole general partner, Texas Capital. The LP Agreement provides that Texas Capital has the right to vote or execute consents with respect to any shares of EFH Corp.'s common stock owned by Texas Holdings. The LLC Agreement and LP Agreement contain agreements among the parties with respect to the election of EFH Corp.'s directors, restrictions on the issuance or transfer of interests in EFH Corp., including tag-along rights and drag-along rights, and other corporate governance provisions (including the right to approve various corporate actions).

The LLC Agreement provides that Texas Capital and its members will take all action required to ensure that the managers of Texas Capital are also members of EFH Corp.'s Board. Pursuant to the LLC Agreement each of (i) KKR 2006 Fund L.P. and affiliated investment funds, (ii) TPG Partners V, L.P. and affiliated investment funds and (iii) certain funds affiliated with Goldman, Sachs & Co. (Goldman), an affiliate of GS Capital Partners, has the right to designate three managers of Texas Capital. These rights are subject to maintenance of certain investment levels in Texas Holdings.

Registration Rights Agreement

The Sponsor Group and the Co-Investors entered into a registration rights agreement with EFIH’s parent company, EFH Corp., upon completion of the Merger. Pursuant to this agreement, in certain circumstances, the Sponsor Group can cause EFH Corp. to register shares of EFH Corp.'s common stock owned directly or indirectly by them under the Securities Act. In certain circumstances, the Sponsor Group and the Co-Investors are also entitled to participate on a pro rata basis in any registration of EFH Corp.'s common stock under the Securities Act that it may undertake. Mr. Youngblood, who is a member of the EFIH Board of Managers, and Messrs. Young and Keglevic, each of whom are executive officers of EFIH and EFH Corp., are parties to this agreement.

Management Services Agreement

In October 2007, in connection with the Merger, the Sponsor Group and Lehman Brothers Inc. entered into a management agreement with EFIH’s parent company, EFH Corp. (Management Agreement), pursuant to which affiliates of the Sponsor Group provide management, consulting, financial and other advisory services to EFH Corp. Pursuant to the Management Agreement, affiliates of the Sponsor Group are entitled to receive an aggregate annual management fee of $35 million, which amount increases 2% annually, and reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with the provision of services pursuant to the Management Agreement. The Management Agreement will continue in effect from year to year, unless terminated upon a change of control of EFH Corp. or in connection with an initial public offering of EFH Corp. or if the parties thereto mutually agree to terminate the Management Agreement. In addition, the Management Agreement provides that the Sponsor Group will be entitled to receive a fee equal to a percentage of the gross transaction value in connection with certain subsequent financing, acquisition, disposition, merger combination and change of control transactions, as well as a termination fee based on the net present value of future payment obligations under the Management Agreement in the event of an initial public offering or under certain other circumstances. Beginning with the quarterly management fee due December 31, 2013, the Sponsor Group, while reserving the right to receive the fees, directed EFH Corp. to suspend payments of the management fees for an indefinite period, and no such management fees were paid to the Sponsor Group during ~~2014~~2015. Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement approved by the Bankruptcy Court in December 2015, the Management Agreement has been terminated and the Sponsor Group has agreed to forego any and all claims under the Management Agreement in exchange for releases of alleged liabilities against the debtors.

Indemnification Agreement

Concurrently with entering into the Management Agreement, the Sponsor Group, Texas Holdings and EFIH’s parent company, EFH Corp., entered into an indemnification agreement (Indemnification Agreement), pursuant to which EFH Corp. and Texas Holdings agree to indemnify the Sponsor Group and their affiliates against any claims relating to (i) certain securities and financing transactions relating to the Merger, (ii) the performance of transaction services pursuant to the Management Agreement, (iii) actions or failures to act by EFH Corp., Texas Holdings, Texas Capital or their subsidiaries or affiliates (collectively, Company Group), (iv) service as an officer or director of, or at the request of, any member of the Company Group, and (v) any breach or alleged breach of fiduciary duty as a director or officer of any member of the Company Group.

Sale Participation Agreement

Mr. Youngblood, who is a member of the EFIH and EFH Corp. Boards, Mr. Young, who is a member of the Boards and an executive officer of EFIH and EFH Corp. and Mr. Keglevic, who is a member of the Board of EFIH and an executive officer of EFIH and EFH Corp. and Ms. Doré who is an executive officer of EFIH and EFH Corp., entered into sale participation agreements with EFIH’s parent company, EFH Corp. Pursuant to the terms of these agreements, among other things, shares of EFH Corp.'s common stock held by these individuals are subject to tag-along and drag-along rights in the event of a sale by the Sponsor Group of shares of EFH Corp.'s common stock held by the Sponsor Group. Mr. Cremens does not own shares of EFH Corp.’s common stock and has not entered into a sale participation agreement with EFH Corp.

Management Stockholders' Agreement

Subject to a management stockholders' agreement, EFIH’s managers, its executive officers, and other members of management, elected to invest in EFH Corp. by contributing cash or common stock, or a combination of both, to EFH Corp. prior to or following the Merger and receiving common stock in EFH Corp. in exchange therefore. The management stockholders' agreement creates certain rights and restrictions on these shares of common stock, including transfer restrictions and tag-along, drag-along, put, call and registration rights in certain circumstances. Mr. Cremens does not own shares of EFH Corp.’s common stock and has not entered into the management stockholders’ agreement.

Director Stockholders' Agreement

Certain members of the EFIH Board have entered into a stockholders' agreement with EFIH’s parent company, EFH Corp. These stockholders' agreements create certain rights and restrictions on the equity, including transfer restrictions and tag-along, drag-along, put, call and registration rights in certain circumstances. Mr. Cremens does not own shares of EFH Corp.’s common stock and has not entered into a stockholders agreement with EFH Corp.

Transactions with Sponsor Affiliates

TCEH has entered into the TCEH Senior Secured Facilities, and Oncor has entered into a revolving credit facility, each with syndicates of financial institutions and other lenders. These syndicates included affiliates of GS Capital Partners.

Affiliates of GS Capital Partners have from time to time engaged in commercial and investment banking and financial advisory transactions with EFIH in the normal course of business.

From time to time affiliates of the Sponsor Group may acquire debt or debt securities issued by EFH Corp. or its subsidiaries in open market transactions or through loan syndications.

Members of the Sponsor Group and/or their respective affiliates have from time to time entered into, and may continue to enter into, arrangements with EFH Corp. to use its products and services in the ordinary course of business, which often results in revenues to EFH Corp. in excess of $120,000 annually. In addition, EFH Corp. has entered into, and may continue to enter into, arrangements with members of the Sponsor Group and/or their respective affiliates to use their products and services in the ordinary course of their business, which often result in revenues to members of the Sponsor Group or their respective affiliates in excess of $120,000 annually.

Manager Independence

Though not formally considered by the Board because EFH Corp.'s common stock is not currently registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, with the SEC or traded on any national securities exchange, based upon the listing standards for issuers of equity securities on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), the national securities exchange upon which EFH Corp.'s common stock was traded prior to the Merger, only Mr. Cremens and Mr. Youngblood would be considered independent. Because of their relationships with the Sponsor Group or with EFH Corp. directly, none of the other managers would be considered independent under the NYSE listing standards for issuers of equity securities. See "Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions" and Item 11, "Executive Compensation - Manager Compensation." Under the NYSE's audit committee independence requirement for issuers of debt securities, Mr. Youngblood, who constitutes the Audit Committee, is considered independent.


Item 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The Audit Committee of the board of directors of EFH Corp. (Committee) has adopted a policy relating to the engagement of EFH Corp.'s independent auditor that applies to EFH Corp. and its consolidated subsidiaries, including EFIH. The policy provides that in addition to the audit of the financial statements, related quarterly reviews and other audit services, and providing services necessary to complete SEC filings, Deloitte & Touche LLP may be engaged to provide non-audit services as described herein. Prior to engagement, all services to be rendered by the independent auditor must be authorized by the Committee in accordance with preapproval procedures which are defined in the policy. The preapproval procedures require:


1.	The annual review and preapproval by the Committee of all anticipated audit and non-audit services; and


2.	The quarterly preapproval by the Committee of services, if any, not previously approved and the review of the status of previously approved services.

The Committee may also approve certain ongoing non-audit services not previously approved in the limited circumstances provided for in the SEC rules. All services performed by Deloitte & Touche LLP, the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu and their respective affiliates ("Deloitte & Touche") for EFIH in ~~2013~~2015 were preapproved by the Committee.

The policy defines those non-audit services which Deloitte & Touche may also be engaged to provide as follows:


1.	Audit related services, including:


a.	due diligence accounting consultations and audits related to mergers, acquisitions and divestitures;


b.	employee benefit plan audits;


c.	accounting and financial reporting standards consultation,


d.	internal control reviews, and


e.	attest services, including agreed upon procedures reports that are not required by statute or regulation.


2.	Tax related services, including:


a.	tax compliance;


b.	general tax consultation and planning,


c.	tax advice related to mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures, and


d.	communications with and request for rulings from tax authorities.


3.	Other services, including:


a.	process improvement, review and assurance;


b.	litigation and rate case assistance;


c.	forensic and investigative services, and


d.	training services.

The policy prohibits EFIH from engaging its independent auditor to provide:


1.	Bookkeeping or other services related to EFIH's accounting records or financial statements;


2.	Financial information systems design and implementation services;


3.	Appraisal or valuation services, fairness opinions, or contribution-in-kind reports;


4.	Actuarial services;


5.	Internal audit outsourcing services;


6.	Management or human resource functions;


7.	Broker-dealer, investment advisor, or investment banking services;


8.	Legal and expert services unrelated to the audit, and


9.	Any other service that the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board determines, by regulation, to be impermissible.

In addition, the policy prohibits EFIH's independent auditor from providing tax or financial planning advice to any officer of EFIH.

Compliance with the Committee's policy relating to the engagement of Deloitte & Touche is monitored on behalf of the Committee by EFIH's chief accounting officer. Reports describing the services provided by the firm and fees for such services are provided to the Committee no less often than quarterly.

82For the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, fees billed (in US dollars) to EFIH by Deloitte & Touche were as follows:

For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, fees billed (in US dollars) to EFIH by Deloitte & Touche were as follows:



	2015		2014
Audit Fees. Fees for services necessary to perform the annual audit, review SEC filings, fulfill statutory and other service requirements and provide comfort letters and consents.	$	1,400,000	$	1,364,000
Audit-Related Fees. Fees for services including due diligence related to mergers, acquisitions and divestitures, accounting consultations and audits in connection with acquisitions, internal control reviews, attest services that are not required by statute or regulation, and consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards	322,500		24,000
Tax Fees. Fees for tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice related to mergers and acquisitions, divestitures, and communications with and requests for rulings from taxing authorities.	1,000		—
All Other Fees. Fees for services including process improvement reviews, forensic accounting reviews, litigation assistance and training services	—		—
Total	$	1,723,500	$	1,388,000

	2014		2013
Audit Fees. Fees for services necessary to perform the annual audit, review SEC filings, fulfill statutory and other service requirements and provide comfort letters and consents.	$	1,364,000	$	546,000
Audit-Related Fees. Fees for services including due diligence related to mergers, acquisitions and divestitures, accounting consultations and audits in connection with acquisitions, internal control reviews, attest services that are not required by statute or regulation, and consultation concerning financial accounting and reporting standards	24,000		—
Tax Fees. Fees for tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice related to mergers and acquisitions, divestitures, and communications with and requests for rulings from taxing authorities.	—		—
All Other Fees. Fees for services including process improvement reviews, forensic accounting reviews, litigation assistance and training services	—		—
Total	$	1,388,000	$	546,000

PART IV.


Item 15.	EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES


(a)	Oncor Holdings Financial Statements are presented pursuant to Rules 3–09 and 3–16 of Regulation S-X as Exhibit 99(d).


(b)	Exhibits:

EFIH Exhibits to Form 10-K for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015

Exhibits	Previously Filed* With File Number	AsExhibit
(2)	Plan of Acquisition, Reorganization, Arrangement, Liquidation, or Succession
2(a)	1-12833Form 8-K(filed February 26, 2007)	2.1	—	Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated February 25, 2007, by and among Energy Future Holdings Corp. (formerly known as TXU Corp.), Texas Energy Future Holdings Limited Partnership and Texas Energy Future Merger Sub Corp.
2(b)	1-12833Form 8-K (filed December 11, 2015)	2(a)	—	Amended Order Confirming the Debtors' Sixth Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code entered by the Bankruptcy Court on December 9, 2015
2(c)	1-12833Form 8-K (filed December 11, 2015)	2(b)	—	The Debtors' Sixth Amended Joint Plan of Reorganization Pursuant to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code effective as of December 7, 2015
(3(i))	Articles of Incorporation
3(a)	333-153529Form S-4(filed September 17, 2008)	3(c)	—	Certificate of Formation of Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, as amended
(3(ii))	By-laws
3(b)	1-34544Form 10-K(filed February 21, 2012)	3(b)	—	Second Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Agreement of Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC
(4)	Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, Including Indentures.
	Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC
4(a)	1-12833Form 8-K(filed January 30, 2013)	4.3	—	Supplemental Indenture, dated January 25, 2013, to the indenture, dated November 16, 2009, among Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, EFIH Finance Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 9.75% Senior Secured Notes due 2019.
4(b)	1-12833Form 8-K(filed January 30, 2013)	4.4	—	First Supplemental Indenture, dated January 29, 2013, to the indenture, dated August 17, 2010, among Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, EFIH Finance Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 10.000% Senior Secured Notes due 2020.
4(c)	1-34544Form 10-Q (March 31, 2013)(filed May 2, 2013)	4(n)	—	Second Supplemental Indenture, dated March 21, 2013, to the Indenture dated August 17, 2010, among Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, EFIH Finance Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 10.000% Senior Secured Notes due 2020.
4(d)	1-34544Form 8-K(filed January 30, 2013)	4.5	—	Second Supplemental Indenture, dated January 29, 2013, to the indenture dated December 5, 2012, among Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, EFIH Finance Inc., and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 11.25%/12.25% Senior Toggle Notes due 2018.
4(e)	1-34544Form 10-K (2012)(filed February 19, 2013)	4.1	—	Third Supplemental Indenture, dated January 30, 2013, to the indenture, dated December 5, 2012, among Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, EFIH Finance Inc., and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 11.25%/12.25% Senior Toggle Notes due 2018.
4(f)	1-12833Form 8-K(filed November 20, 2009)	4.2	—	Indenture, dated as of November 16, 2009, among Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC and EFIH Finance Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee
4(g)	1-12833Form 8-K(filed January 30, 2013)	4.3	—	Supplemental Indenture, dated January 25, 2013, to the indenture, dated November 16, 2009, among Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, EFIH Finance Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 9.75% Senior Secured Notes due 2019.



Exhibits	Previously Filed* With File Number	As Exhibit

4(e)	1-34544 Form 10-K (2012) (filed February 19, 2013)	4.1	—	Third Supplemental Indenture, dated January 30, 2013, to the indenture, dated December 5, 2012, among Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, EFIH Finance Inc., and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 11.25%/12.25% Senior Toggle Notes due 2018.

4(f)	1-12833 Form 8-K (filed November 20, 2009)	4.2	—	Indenture, dated as of November 16, 2009, among Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC and EFIH Finance Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee

4(g)	1-12833 Form 8-K (filed January 30, 2013)	4.3	—	Supplemental Indenture, dated January 25, 2013, to the indenture, dated November 16, 2009, among Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, EFIH Finance Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 9.75% Senior Secured Notes due 2019.

4(h)	1-12833 Form 10-K (filed August 18, 2010)	4.1	—	Indenture, dated August 17, 2010, among Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, EFIH Finance Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 10.000% Senior Secured Notes due 2020.

4(i)	1-12833 Form 8-K (filed January 30, 2013)	4.4	—	First Supplemental Indenture, dated January 29, 2013, to the indenture, dated August 17, 2010, among Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, EFIH Finance Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 10.000% Senior Secured Notes due 2020.

4(j)	1-12833 Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2011) (filed April 29, 2011)	4(e)	—	Indenture, dated as of April 25, 2011, among Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, EFIH Finance, Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 11% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2021.

4(k)	1-12833 Form 8-K (filed February 7, 2012)	4.1	—	First Supplemental Indenture, dated February 6, 2012, to the Indenture dated April 25, 2011, among Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, EFIH Finance Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, relating to 11.750% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2022.

4(l)	1-12833 Form 8-K (filed February 29, 2012)	4.1	—	Second Supplemental Indenture, dated February 28, 2012, to the indenture dated April 25, 2011, among Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, EFIH Finance Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, relating to 11.750% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2022.

4(m)	1-12833 Form 10-Q (Quarter ended June 30, 2012) (filed July 31, 2012)	4(a)	—	Third Supplemental Indenture, dated May 31, 2012, to the indenture dated April 25, 2011, among Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, EFIH Finance Inc. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Trustee, relating to 11.750% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2022.

4(n)	1-12833 Form 8-K (filed August 17, 2012)	4.2	—	Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated August 14, 2012, among Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, EFIH Finance Inc. and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 11.75% Senior Secured Second Lien Notes due 2022.

4(o)	1-12833 Form 8-K (filed August 17, 2012)	4.1	—	Indenture, dated August 14, 2012, among Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, EFIH Finance Inc. and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 6.875% Senior Secured Notes due 2017.

4(p)	1-12833 Form 8-K (filed October 24, 2012)	4.1	—	First Supplemental Indenture, dated October 23, 2012, to the indenture, dated August 14, 2012, among Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, EFIH Finance Inc., and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 6.875% Senior Secured Notes due 2017.



Exhibits	Previously Filed* With File Number	As Exhibit

4(q)	1-12833 Form 8-K (filed December 5, 2012)	4.1	—	Indenture, dated December 5, 2012, among Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, EFIH Finance Inc., and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 11.25%/12.25% Senior Toggle Notes due 2018.

4(r)	1-12833 Form 8-K (filed December 21, 2012)	4.1	—	First Supplemental Indenture, dated December 19, 2012, to the indenture dated December 5, 2012, among Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, EFIH Finance Inc., and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 11.25%/12.25% Senior Toggle Notes due 2018.

4(s)	1-34544 Form 8-K (filed January 30, 2013)	4.5	—	Second Supplemental Indenture, dated January 29, 2013, to the indenture dated December 5, 2012, among Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, EFIH Finance Inc., and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 11.25%/12.25% Senior Toggle Notes due 2018.

4(t)		4.1	—	Third Supplemental Indenture, dated January 30, 2013, to the indenture, dated December 5, 2012, among Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, EFIH Finance Inc., and the Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 11.25%/12.25% Senior Toggle Notes due 2018.

4(u)	1-12833 Form 10-Q (Quarter ended March 31, 2011) (filed April 29, 2011)	4(f)	—	Junior Lien Pledge Agreement, dated as of April 25, 2011, from Energy Future Intermediate Holding Company LLC, as pledgor, to The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as collateral trustee.

	Energy Future Holdings Corp. (Merger-related push down debt)

4(v)	1-34544 Form 10-Q (March 31, 2013) (filed May 2, 2013)	4(a)	—	Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated April 15, 2013, to the Indenture, dated October 31, 2007, among Energy Future Holdings Corp., the guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to Senior Notes due 2017 and Senior Toggle Notes due 2017.

4(w)	1-12833 Form 8-K (filed October 31, 2007)	4.1	—	Indenture, dated October 31, 2007, among Energy Future Holdings Corp., the guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee, relating to Senior Notes due 2017 and Senior Toggle Notes due 2017.

4(x)	1-12833 Form 10-K (2009) (filed February 19, 2010)	4(f)	—	Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 8, 2008, to the Indenture, dated as of October 31, 2007, relating to Energy Future Holdings Corp.’s 10.875% Senior Notes due 2017 and 11.25%/12.00% Senior Toggle Notes due 2017.

4(y)	1-12833 Form 10-Q (Quarter ended June 30, 2009) (filed August 4, 2009)	4(a)	—	Second Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 3, 2009, to the Indenture, dated as of October 31, 2007, relating to Energy Future Holdings Corp.’s 10.875% Senior Notes due 2017 and 11.25%/12.00% Senior Toggle Notes due 2017.

4(z)	1-12833 Form 8-K (filed July 30, 2010)	99.1	—	Third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 29, 2010, to the Indenture dated as of October 31, 2007, relating to EFH Corp.’s 10.875% Senior Notes due 2017 and 11.25%/12.00% Senior Toggle Notes due 2017

4(aa)	1-12833 Form 10-Q (Quarter ended September 30, 2011) (filed October 28, 2011)	4(b)	—	Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated October 18, 2011, to the Indenture dated October 31, 2007.



Exhibits	Previously Filed* With File Number	As Exhibit

4(bb)	1-12833 Form 8-K (filed November 20, 2009)	4.1	—	Indenture, dated November 16, 2009, among Energy Future Holdings Corp., the guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 9.75% Senior Secured Notes due 2019.

4(cc)	1-12833 Form 8-K (filed January 30, 2013)	4.1		Supplemental Indenture, dated January 25, 2013, to the indenture, dated November 16, 2009, among Energy Future Holdings Corp., the guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 9.75% Senior Secured Notes due 2019.

4(dd)	333-171253 Form S-4 (filed January 24, 2011)	4(k)	—	Indenture, dated January 12, 2010, among Energy Future Holdings Corp., the guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 10.000% Senior Secured Notes due 2020.

4(ee)	333-165860 Form S-3 (filed April 1, 2010)	4(j)	—	First Supplemental Indenture, dated March 16, 2010, to the Indenture, dated January 12, 2010, among Energy Future Holdings Corp., the guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 10.000% Senior Secured Notes due 2020.

4(ff)	1-12833 Form 10-Q (Quarter ended June 30, 2010) (filed August 2, 2010)	4(a)	—	Second Supplemental Indenture, dated April 13, 2010, to the Indenture, dated January 12, 2010, among Energy Future Holdings Corp., the guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 10.000% Senior Secured Notes due 2020.

4(gg)	1-12833 Form 10-Q (Quarter ended June 30, 2010) (filed August 2, 2010)	4(b)	—	Third Supplemental Indenture, dated April 14, 2010, to the Indenture, dated January 12, 2010, among Energy Future Holdings Corp., the guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 10.000% Senior Secured notes due 2020.

4(hh)	1-12833 Form 10-Q (Quarter ended June 30, 2010) (filed August 2, 2010)	4(c)	—	Fourth Supplemental Indenture, dated May 21, 2010, to the Indenture, dated January 12, 2010, among Energy Future Holdings Corp., the guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 10.000% Senior Secured Notes due 2020.

4(ii)	1-12833 Form 10-Q (Quarter ended June 30, 2010) (filed August 2, 2010)	4(d)	—	Fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated July 2, 2010, to the Indenture, dated January 12, 2010, among Energy Future Holdings Corp., the guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 10.000% Senior Secured Notes due 2020.

4(jj)	1-12833 Form 10-Q (Quarter ended June 30, 2010) (filed August 2, 2010)	4(e)	—	Sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated July 6, 2010, to the Indenture, dated January 12, 2010, among Energy Future Holdings Corp., the guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 10.000% Senior Secured Notes due 2020.

4(kk)	1-12833 Form 10-Q (Quarter ended June 30, 2010) (filed August 2, 2010)	4(f)	—	Seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated July 7, 2010, to the Indenture, dated January 12, 2010, among Energy Future Holdings Corp., the guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 10.000% Senior Secured Notes due 2020.

4(ll)	1-12833 Form 8-K (filed January 30, 2013)	4.2	—	Eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated January 25, 2013, to the Indenture, dated January 12, 2010, among Energy Future Holdings Corp., the guarantors named therein and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as trustee, relating to 10.000% Senior Secured Notes due 2020.

Filing Compare · Energy Future Intermediate Holding CO LLC