UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

_______________________

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of The

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): ~~September~~July 628, ~~2013~~2014

LITHIUM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	1-10446	13-3411148
(State or other jurisdiction of	(Commission	(IRS Employer
incorporation)	File Number)	Identification No.)

10660 Page Ave, 1222 Fairfax, Virginia		22038
10660 Page Ave, 1222, Fairfax, Virginia		22038
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

Our telephone number, including area code: (571) 207-9058

_________________

10379B Democracy Lane Fairfax Virginia 22030

___________________

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of us under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):

£☐ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

£☐ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

£☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

£☐ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

Item 57.0201 Regulation ~~Departure~~FD ~~of Directors or Principal Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Principal Officers~~Disclosure

On 628 ~~September~~July ~~2013~~2014, ~~the~~ Registrant, atand ~~its~~certain ~~board~~holders of ~~directors~~ ~~meeting~~approximately €1,350,000 ~~considered~~in ~~the~~principal ~~resignations~~amount ~~tendered~~of byRegistrant’s ~~directors~~debt ~~Clemens~~concluded ~~van~~a ~~Nispen~~legal ~~and~~action ~~Rien~~commenced ~~Nuijt.~~in ~~Mssrs.~~April ~~van~~2013 ~~Nispen~~in ~~and~~the ~~Nuijt, representatives~~United ofStates ~~Arch~~District ~~Hill~~Court ~~Capital~~for ~~N.V.~~the ~~and~~District ~~certain~~ of ~~its~~Delaware ~~affiliates~~captioned ~~(the~~Virium ~~“Arch~~et ~~Hill~~al. ~~Parties”)~~v. ~~had~~Lithium ~~become~~Technology ~~directors of~~Corporation ~~the~~(Case ~~Registrant~~No. in1:13-cv-00500-LPS). ~~late~~The ~~2012~~debt onat anissue ~~interim~~constitutes ~~basis~~part toof ~~assist~~the intotal aof ~~smooth~~approximately ~~leadership~~€7,125,100 ~~transition~~in ~~concurrent~~principal ~~with~~amount ~~the~~of ~~conversion~~indebtedness held by ~~the~~ ~~Arch~~holders ~~Hill Parties~~ of ~~substantially all of the~~ Registrant’s ~~debt~~Convertible ~~owed~~Promissory toNotes ~~the~~first ~~Arch~~issued ~~Hill~~in ~~Parties~~2008 ~~into equity~~ (asthe a“Notes”). ~~result~~ All of ~~which~~ the ~~Arch~~Notes ~~Hill~~are ~~Parties~~secured ~~held~~by ~~approximately~~a ~~57%~~security ofinterest ~~the~~in ~~outstanding~~all ~~equity~~ of ~~the~~ Registrant)’s assets, ~~and~~but the ~~Arch~~Notes ~~Hill~~are ~~Parties’ subsequent~~not ~~sale~~governed ofby ~~that~~a ~~interest~~single inindenture ~~the~~or ~~Registrant~~similar ~~to VRDT Corporation~~agreement. ~~The~~Certain ~~transactions~~of ~~resulted~~the inNotes ~~VRDT~~held ~~Corporation,~~by ~~through its~~the ~~wholly-owned~~plaintiff ~~subsidiary,~~holders ~~becoming~~ (the ~~majority~~“minority ~~shareholder~~holders”) ofmatured ~~the~~in ~~Registrant.~~2011, Inand ~~connection with~~ the ~~advancement~~holders of the ~~Registrant’s continuing~~balance ~~commercialization~~of ~~efforts~~the ~~since~~Notes (the ~~Arch~~“majority ~~Hill~~holders”) ~~Parties’~~entered ~~disposition~~into ofdiscussions ~~their~~with ~~shares in~~ the Registrant~~, the Board, collectively, and Mssrs~~. ~~Van~~Since ~~Nispen and Nuijt~~2011, ~~individually, determined that~~ the ~~timing~~prior ~~was appropriate for them each to resign their positions on the Board~~ and ~~facilitate~~ the ~~possible~~current ~~appointment~~management of ~~new~~Registrant ~~directors~~has bybeen ~~the~~in ~~remaining~~discussion ~~directors~~with or the ~~Registrant’s stockholders.~~majority Asholders aand ~~result~~seeking ofto ~~the~~negotiate ~~resignations~~with of the ~~two~~minority ~~directors,~~holders ~~the~~regarding ~~Board~~a ~~now~~consensual ~~consists~~restructuring of ~~Graham~~Registrant’s ~~Norton-Standen,~~indebtedness ~~Martin~~(including ~~Koster and~~the ~~William Armstrong~~Notes).

In the action, the minority holders (representing approximately 19% of the principal amount of all Notes) sought confirmation of the debt evidenced by the Notes (which was not contested by Registrant and is currently $3,329,137.04 in total (including attorneys’ fees) with respect to the minority holders) and confirmation of certain security interests in assets of Registrant or its subsidiaries, part of which was contested by Registrant. The action was resolved by confirming the uncontested indebtedness, ordering Registrant to re-grant a limited security interest, covering a subset of the assets the minority holders had alleged were covered by the original security interest grant, and confirming (ordering) a commitment of Registrant contained in the Notes not to grant any new security interests in the same collateral without the Note holders’ consent. Registrant promptly complied with the order to re-grant a limited security interest and has complied and intends to continue to comply with its covenant not to grant additional security interests in the same collateral.

Following clarification of the scope of the security interest securing the Notes, Registrant is continuing its active discussions for a consensual restructuring with the holders of approximately 81% of the Notes, and has repeated its standing offer to the minority holders to join in the negotiations. The minority holders have declined to enter into the negotiations, pending Registrant’s acquiescence to demands Registrant understands relate primarily to the minority holders’ attempt to perfect their security interest in the principal security securing all of the Notes, Registrant’s equity interest in its sole subsidiary, GAIA Holdings B.V. Registrant is currently reviewing such demands. Registrant has also been notified by the majority holders regarding the majority holders’ security interest in the same collateral. Registrant understands that any priority issues as between the various Note holders will be resolved between the holders. If Registrant is not able to reach a consensual restructuring with its Note holders, Registrant reserves all rights to protect the interests of all creditors, shareholders and other appropriate stakeholders.

The information in the preceding paragraphs shall not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference in filings under the Securities Act of 1933.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we have duly caused this report to be signed on our behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

Date: September 12, 2013

Date: August 3, 2014

LITHIUM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION

(Registrant)

By:

/s/ Martin Koster

Martin Koster, CEO

LITHIUM TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION (Registrant) By: /s/ Martin Koster Martin Koster Chief Executive Officer

Filing Compare · LITHIUM TECHNOLOGY CORP