SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[X] ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended:		October 31, 2009
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from		___________				to	____________
	Commission file number:			333-158203
	Eco Energy Pumps, Inc.
	(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
	Nevada							26-3550371
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)						(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
	112 North Curry Street, Carson City, NV 89703-4934
	(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)					(775) 284-3713
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined by Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
									Yes \|_\| No \|X\|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
									Yes \|X\| No \|_\|
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
									\|_\|
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
Large accelerated filer [ ]								Accelerated filer [ ]
Non-accelerated filer [ ] (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)								Smaller reporting company [X]
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
									Yes \|X\| No \|_\|
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and ask price of such common equity: As of October 31, 2009, the aggregate value of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates was $14,350.

UNITED STATES

~~TABLE~~SECURITIES OFAND ~~CONTENTS~~EXCHANGE COMMISSION

~~Page~~Washington, D.C. 20549

~~Number~~FORM 10-K

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED: OCTOBER 31, 2010

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from __________ to ____________

Commission File Number: 333-158203

ECO ENERGY PUMPS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	263550371
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
112 North Curry Street, Carson City, NV 89703-4934
(Address of principal executive office and zip code)

(775) 284-3713
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None.

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $0.001

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No o

Indicate by checkmark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months ( or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.

Yes o No x (Not required by smaller reporting companies)

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o

Accelerated filer o

Non-accelerated filer o

Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes o No x

As of February 11, 2011, the aggregate market value of the shares of the Registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates (based upon the closing price of such shares as reported on the Pink Sheets) was approximately $14,350.00 Shares of the Registrant’s common stock held by each executive officer and director and by each person who owns 10 percent or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates of the Registrant. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

As of February 11, 2011, there were 2,267,320 shares of the Registrant’s common stock issued and outstanding.

ECO ENERGY PUMPS, INC.

FORM 10-K

For the Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2010

		Page
	PART I

Item 1.	Business	4

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	8

Item 2.	Properties	12

Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	12

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	12

	PART II

Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	13

Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	14

Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	14

Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Financial Data	18

Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	18

Item 9A(T)	Controls and Procedures	19

Item 9B.	Other Information.	20

	PART III

Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	20

Item 11.	Executive Compensation	22

Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	24

Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions, and director independence	24

Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	25

	PART IV

Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules	25

Forward-Looking Statements

Statements contained in this annual report include “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of such term in Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause actual financial or operating results, performances or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements not to occur or be realized. Forward-looking statements made in this Report generally are based on our best estimates of future results, performances or achievements, predicated upon current conditions and the most recent results of the companies involved and their respective industries. Forward-looking statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “project,” “expect,” “believe,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “continue,” “potential,” “opportunity” or similar terms, variations of those terms or the negative of those terms or other variations of those terms or comparable words or expressions. Potential risks and uncertainties include, among other things, such factors as:

		our heavy reliance on limited number of consumers;
		strong competition in our industry;
		increases in our raw material costs; and
		an inability to fund our capital requirements.

Additional disclosures regarding factors that could cause our results and performance to differ from results or performance anticipated by this annual report are discussed in Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” Readers are urged to carefully review and consider the various disclosures made by us in this annual report and our other filings with the SEC. These reports attempt to advise interested parties of the risks and factors that may affect our business, financial condition and results of operations and prospects. The forward-looking statements made in this annual report speak only as of the date hereof and we disclaim any obligation to provide updates, revisions or amendments to any forward-looking statements to reflect changes in our expectations or future events.

PART I

Item 1.	Business	3
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	4
Item 1B	Unresolved Staff Comments	4
Item 2	Properties	4
Item 3	Legal Proceedings	4
Item 4	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	4

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS

Organizational History

Eco Energy Pumps, Inc. (“Eco Energy Pumps”, “we”, “the Company”) was incorporated as a for-profit company in the State of Nevada on October 14, 2008 and established a fiscal year end of October 31. Until October 2010, the Company was a development-stage Company that intended to develop an efficient water pump powered by solar energy with an exclusive pump design.

On October 25, 2010, the Company acquired DLT International Limited, a privately held corporation organized under the laws of the British Virgin Islands (“DLT”), in accordance with a Securities Exchange Agreement (the “Agreement”). DLT was organized under the laws of the British Virgin Islands on March 18, 2010. DLT is a holding company whose principal operating company develops, manufactures and distributes automotive testing equipment in the People's Republic of China. Upon consummation of the Exchange, the Registrant adopted the business plan of DLT.

Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the Company acquired DLT in exchange for an aggregate of 2,267,320 newly issued shares (the “Exchange Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”) issued to DLT Shareholders in accordance with their pro rata ownership of DLT equity (the “Exchange”). As a result of the Exchange, DLT became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. In addition, our principal stockholder agreed to retire their 9,300,000 shares of Common Stock. Following the Exchange, and upon giving effect to the Split, the Company had an aggregate of approximately 36,000,000 shares issued and outstanding.

Pursuant to a Agreement with DLT, the Company agreed to file the Amendments (as defined below) as soon as practicable following the closing of the Exchange. On October 18, 2010, a majority of the Company’s Shareholders voted to amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to (i) change the name of the Company to “DLT International, Ltd.” (the “Name Change”) (ii) increase the number of the Company’s authorized shares of capital stock from 75,000,000 shares to 310,000,000 of which 300,000,000 shares will be common stock par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”) and 10,000,000 shares will be preferred stock par value $0.001 per share (the “Preferred Stock”) (the “Authorized Stock Increase”); (iii) effectuate a forward stock split of our issued and outstanding Common Stock by changing and reclassifying each 1 share of our issued and outstanding Common Stock into fourteen 14 and 29/100 (14.29) fully paid and non-assessable shares of Common Stock (“Forward Split”); and (iv) authorize the Board of Directors to provide for the issuance of shares of preferred stock in series and, by filing a certificate pursuant to the Nevada Revised Statutes (hereinafter, along with any similar designation relating to any other class of stock that may hereafter be authorized, referred to as a “Preferred Stock Designation”), to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in each such series, and to fix the designation, power, preferences and rights of the shares of each such series and the qualifications, limitations and restrictions thereof (the “Blank Check Preferred Stock”) (the Name Change, Authorized Stock Increase, Forward Split and creation of Blank Check Preferred Stock are collectively referred to as the “Amendments”).

At the effective time of the Exchange, our Board of Directors was reconstituted by the resignation of John David Palmer and Jeannette Aparecida da Silva from their role as the Company’s officers and director, and the appointment of Xiu Liang Zhang as the Company’s Chairman and President; Jun Liu as a Director and Chief Executive Officer; and Zhengying Li as a Director and Chief Financial Officer. See “Directors and Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance.”

Following the issuance of the Exchange Shares and the retirement of our principal shareholder shares, DLT’s sole shareholder, KME Investments Group Limited, became the Registrant’s principal shareholder, owning approximately eighty-nine percent (89%) of the Registrant’s outstanding Common Stock. Accordingly, the Exchange represents a change in control. As of the date of this report, and upon giving effect to the Split, there are 36,000,000 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding. For financial accounting purposes, the acquisition was a reverse acquisition of the Company by DLT under the purchase method of accounting, and was treated as a recapitalization with DLT as the acquirer. Upon consummation of the Exchange, the Company adopted the business plan of DLT.

Overview

Eco Energy Pumps, Inc. (“Eco Energy Pumps”, “we”, “the Company”) was incorporated as a for-profit company in the State of Nevada on October 14, 2008 and established a fiscal year end of October 31. Prior to the Exchange, we were a development-stage Company that intended to develop an efficient water pump powered by solar energy. As a result of the Exchange with DLT International Limited (“DLT”), we have adopted the business plan of DLT.

DLT, through its wholly-owned Chinese subsidiary, Dalei Vehicle Inspecting Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd (“Dalei”), is a manufacturer and supplier of automotive emissions testing equipment and software control systems and a provider of comprehensive inspection station management services. Such services include the establishment of systems, standards and equipment supply, create inspection service market rules and formulate market rules with the government together in order to constitute a complete set of industry management methods and management measures, which include staff training, equipment access, inspection technology standards, management content and specific requirements.

The initial goal of Dalei is to construct a chain of inspection stations in China. DLT has established a joint venture of two vehicle inspection stations, and has commenced operations. At present company's main business is motor vehicle testing equipment and software control systems. The main target clients are the comprehensive testing centers owned by the Ministry of Transportation and the Safety Testing Centers owned by the Ministry of Public Security, military, garage workshops, motor vehicle manufacturers, public transport companies and motor vehicle exhaust gas emission testing centers owned by Ministry of Environmental Protection.

Market Opportunity

The National Bureau of Statistics announced that in 2009, the number of on road motor vehicles reached 180 million in China, an average annual growth rate of 23%. As a comparison, in 2007, there were 70 million vehicles on the road in China. As a result, the Peoples Republic of China has provided a regulatory framework to mandate the regulation of emissions including China's Air Pollution Prevention Law, Vehicle Emission Pollution Control Technology Policy, 2005-2007 On Road Use of Motor Vehicle Pollution Control Requirements and Light-engine Vehicle Exhaust gas emission Limits and Measurement Methods (even idling law and the Summary condition).

It is estimated that by 2010 the number of on-road motor vehicles in China will reach 200 million; market total demand for 73,900 sets for exhaust gas detection equipment. At an average of 500,000 RMB per set of equipment, market capacity could reach approximately 36.95 billion RMB. It is further estimated that by 2013 there will be a demand for 30,000 safety inspection and comprehensive inspection stations in the domestic market. The equipment cost for each station is approximately 500,000 RMB. The total market capacity could be 15 billion RMB.

In May 2004, the People’s Republic of China enacted the Road Traffic Safety Law which required that vehicle inspection agency must be private agency after February 2006. In 2006, the State Environmental Protection Bureau began to construct automobile exhaust emissions inspection stations across the whole nation. The government wants capable professional organizations with experience and strength to undertake this business project, which can bring a comprehensive plan to the solution in order to reduce the burden of the government administration.

As a result of additional regulatory requirements, including National Standards GB7258-2004, GB8565-2001, GA 468-2004 and JT/T478 which govern motor vehicle testing station computer control system of technical specifications and other series of technical specifications, inspection and comprehensive testing stations are required to upgrade their technology. At present; there are more than 4,000 motor vehicle safety inspection stations nationwide. The average upgrading cost for each station is approximately 300,000 RMB. The total market capacity may be approximately 1.2 billion RMB.

Motor vehicle repair industry business standards (GB/T16739-2004) and motor vehicle passenger transport station management regulations require that motor vehicle repair workshops and passenger transport stations must be equipped with vehicle testing equipments.

At present, it is estimated that there are approximately 6,000 “second grade” motor vehicle passenger transport stations which could potentially require upgrading. The equipment cost for each passenger transport station is approximately 200,000 RMB. Thus, since less than 10% of the stations are equipped with testing equipment must market capacity could be 1.2 billion RMB.

Vehicle inspection service currently requires compulsory annual inspection and environmental protection inspection pursuant to federal and local law. The inspection services are conducted only by approved inspection agency according to the rules and laws stipulated by the government. It is a public service provided to the society with scope covering all vehicles for annual inspection.

Products

Smart Fuel Control System (SFCS) is a system that can change diesel or petrol vehicle into diesel/gas or petrol/gas dual-fuel vehicles.

1. Diesel / Gas (LNG/CNG) dual-fuel system

System features

Double decompressions, positive pressure air intake, ECU intelligent electronic control, control of diesel fuel ignited, and unique conversion throttle body.

Applicable automobile models

	Ordinary diesel vehicles

	Turbocharged diesel engine vehicles

Fuel species



Diesel

	Compressed natural gas (CNG)

	Liquefied natural gas (LNG)

Performance benefits

Advantage – International advanced mechanical and electrical integration technology is compatible with a variety of vehicle models and offers easy installation.

Safety – The fuel of turbocharged diesel vehicle is mixed with air after the booster.

Economic – The average replacement rate is of 50% or more. Reducing fuel costs about 30% significantly lower the total costs.

Environmental –Optimization of emissions, reduction of vehicle emissions and protection of the environment.

2. Petrol / Gas (LPG / CNG / LNG) dual-fuel system

System function

Use of SFCS to convert vehicles into petrol / gas dual-fuel vehicles, so that the petrol and gas can be easily switched between the two fuel modes. The operation is safe and reliable. Vehicle can still obtain its normal power and also achieve significant economic benefits.

System features

Positive atmosphere for the pressure. Multi-point sequential injection. ECU intelligent electronic control. Real-time precise control of gas volume. Strong horsepower, lower gas consumption.

Applicable automobile models



Gasoline fuel burning cars



Small and medium sized vans

Fuel species



Gasoline, or liquefied petroleum gas (LPG),



Compressed natural gas (CNG),



Liquefied natural gas (LNG)

Performance benefits

Advantage – Internationally advanced mechanical and electrical integration technology. Engine power and nozzle self-cleaning function.

Safety – Front pressure injection gas, no ignite break-down.

Economic – Reducing fuel costs about 50% or more. Significantly lower the costs. Investment can be recovered within 4 – 6 months

Environmental –Optimization of emissions, reduction of vehicle emissions and protection for the environment.

3. Vehicle exhaust gas emission testing equipment

The rapid increase in the number of cars in China has developed rapidly and heavily polluted city air, threatening the population’s physical health. As a result the government has focused on reducing air pollution through a framework of regulations including such as subjecting the automobile exhaust gas emissions to rigorous testing.

Competition

Compared with other competitors in the industry, DLT has the following advantages in the vehicle testing station’s investment, construction, operation and management.

Brand advantage. DLT’s management has nearly 20 years experience in the field , as the biggest and most complete vehicle inspection repair equipment, computer control system and software product supplier in China, a hi-tech enterprise in Shenzhen, “DLT “ is the registered trade mark by the state industrial and commercial bureau, as well as the main equipment manufacturers in the inspection field around the country.

Professional technology advantage. DLT’s management has professional capability in building plan, equipment manufacture, and installation testing, with nearly 20 years experience in the field of vehicle inspection.

Customer resources advantage. DLT’s management has built approximately 1,000 inspection stations which includes safety inspection station, comprehensive inspection station, vehicle quality control station, and motorcycle performance test centers.

Sales and service network advantage. DLT’s management has established marketing network and technical support system nation wide.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

Risk related to our Business

Because we have not yet commenced our full scale production operations, unexpected factors may hamper our efforts to implement our business plan.

The Company’s main business area is automotive inspection and testing equipment and services to vehicle operators which requires advanced and green technology for its operation. Our business plan contemplates that we will become a major provider in the field of automotive testing services and equipment. In order to achieve this, we plan to expand our chain of automotive environmental and safety testing stations from four to 100 and also expand the production of automotive environmental testing equipment. To date, however, we have built and operated testing stations only in limited areas. If we can obtain sufficient funding as planned, we will commence our operations on a much larger scale. Therefore, appropriate risk management is indispensable. The following business risks which if they occur may materially affect the Company’s performance, stock price, financial position and the decisions of our prospective investors. The actual occurrence of any of those risk factors may materially adversely affect the Company’s results of operation and financial condition.

The capital investments that we plan may result in dilution of the equity of our present shareholders.

Our business plan contemplates that we will invest approximately $3.5 million on our large-scale operations. We intend to raise a large portion of the necessary funds by selling our equity. At present, we have no commitment from any source for those funds. We cannot determine, therefore, the terms on which we will be able to raise the necessary funds. It is possible that we will be required to dilute the value of our current shareholders’ equity in order to obtain the funds. The shareholders may face potential dilution from later rounds of new investors. If, however, we are unable to raise the necessary funds, our growth will be limited, as will our ability to compete effectively. Any failure on raising sufficient funds may affect the Company’s ability to grow and develop.

If contract suppliers become unavailable or delay their production, our business will be negatively impacted.

Our future operating results may depend substantially on the good cooperation with key suppliers. It is important for the company to obtain materials, components and other goods in a timely and proper manner. If we are unable to obtain the necessary materials or components, we may experience production delays which could cause us loss of revenue. If these companies were to terminate their agreements with us without adequate notice, or fail to provide the required capacity and quality on a timely basis, we would be delayed in our ability or unable to process and deliver our products to our customers. It is necessary to procure materials, components and other goods at competitive costs and to optimize the entire supply chain, including suppliers, in order for the company to bring competitive products to market. Furthermore, any case of defective materials, components or other goods may also have an adverse effect on the reliability and reputation of the Company.

Our business and growth will suffer if we are unable to hire and retain key personnel that are in high demand.

Our future success depends on our ability to attract and retain highly skilled human resource personnel in every business area and process, including product development, production, marketing and business management Competition to obtain human resources is intensifying. In general, qualified individuals are in high demand in China, and there are insufficient experienced personnel to fill the demand. If the company is unable to retain and obtain key human resources, this may affect the company’s performance and development. If we are unable to successfully attract or retain the personnel we need to succeed, we will be unable to implement our business plan.

Increased government regulation of our production and/or marketing operations could diminish our profits.

The fuel production and supply business is highly regulated. Government authorities are concerned with effect of fuel distribution on the national and local economy. To achieve optimal availability of fuel, governments regulate many key elements of both production and distribution of fuel. Increased government regulation may affect our business in ways that cannot be predicted at this time, potentially involving price regulation, distribution regulation, and regulation of manufacturing processes. Any such regulation or a combination could have an adverse effect on our profitability.

In addition, the day-to-day operations of our business will require frequent interaction with representatives of the Chinese government institutions. The national, provincial and local governments in the People’s Republic of China are highly bureaucratized. The effort to obtain the registrations, licenses and permits necessary to carry out our business activities can be daunting. Significant delays can result from the need to obtain governmental approval of our activities. These delays can have an adverse effect on the profitability of our operations. In addition, compliance with regulatory requirements applicable to fuel manufacturing and distribution may increase the cost of our operations, which would adversely affect our profitability.

Capital outflow policies in China may hamper our ability to pay dividends to shareholders in the United States.

The People’s Republic of China has adopted currency and capital transfer regulations. Although Chinese governmental policies were introduced in 1996 to allow the convertibility of RMB into foreign currency for current account items, conversion of RMB into foreign exchange for capital items, such as foreign direct investment, loans or securities, requires the approval of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange. We may be unable to obtain all of the required conversion approvals for our operations, and Chinese regulatory authorities may impose greater restrictions on the convertibility of the RMB in the future. Because most of our future revenues will be in RMB, any inability to obtain the requisite approvals or any future restrictions on currency exchanges will limit our ability to pay dividends to our shareholders.

Currency fluctuations may adversely affect our operating results.

The Company conducts its main business in China and generates revenues and incurs expenses and liabilities in RMB, the currency of the People’s Republic of China. However, as a subsidiary of DLT in China, the financial results will be reported in the United States in U.S. Dollars. Consequently, as a general rule, appreciation of RMB has a negative effect on the Company’s business performance and a depreciation of RMB has a positive effect. In this way, fluctuations in exchange rates may affect the company’s operating results.

Protection of intellectual property rights risk

DLT owns various patents and intellectual property rights. And we make every effort to secure intellectual property rights. However, in China, it may not be possible to secure sufficient protection. There is a possibility that the company’s technologies may be disclosed or misused by a third party. It is also possible that any suit in respect of intellectual property rights may be brought against the company or that the company may have to file suit in order to protect its intellectual property rights. In such cases, the company’s business operation and performance may be affected.

We are not likely to hold annual shareholder meetings in the near future.

Management does not expect to hold annual meetings of shareholders in the next few year, due to the expenses involved. The current members of the Board of Directors were appointed to that position by the previous directors. If other directors are added to the Board in the future, it is likely that the current directors will appoint them. As a result, the shareholders of the Company will have no effective means of exercising control over the operations of the Company.

New face a risk of natural disasters affecting our operations.

The Company’s test stations are located in China and expanding around the country. Some natural disasters, such as earthquakes or typhoons in areas where test stations are located, may damage or destroy operations cause transportation interruptions or other similar disruptions, and thus affect the company’s performance and operations significantly.

Risks Related to the Securities Markets and Investments in Our Common Stock

Because our common stock is quoted on the "OTCBB," your ability to sell your shares in the secondary trading market may be limited.

Our common stock is currently quoted on the over-the-counter market on the OTC Electronic Bulletin Board. Consequently, the liquidity of our common stock is impaired, not only in the number of shares that are bought and sold, but also through delays in the timing of transactions, and coverage by security analysts and the news media, if any, of our company. As a result, prices for shares of our common stock may be lower than might otherwise prevail if our common stock was quoted and traded on Nasdaq or a national securities exchange.

Because our shares are "penny stocks," you may have difficulty selling them in the secondary trading market.

Federal regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 regulate the trading of so-called "penny stocks," which are generally defined as any security not listed on a national securities exchange or Nasdaq, priced at less than $5.00 per share and offered by an issuer with limited net tangible assets and revenues. Since our common stock currently is quoted on the "OTCBB" at less than $5.00 per share, our shares are "penny stocks" and may not be traded unless a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated therewith is delivered to a potential purchaser prior to any trade.

In addition, because our common stock is not listed on Nasdaq or any national securities exchange and currently is quoted at and trades at less than $5.00 per share, trading in our common stock is subject to Rule 15g-9 under the Securities Exchange Act. Under this rule, broker-dealers must take certain steps prior to selling a "penny stock," which steps include:

• obtaining financial and investment information from the investor;

• obtaining a written suitability questionnaire and purchase agreement signed by the investor; and

• providing the investor a written identification of the shares being offered and the quantity of the shares.

If these penny stock rules are not followed by the broker-dealer, the investor has no obligation to purchase the shares. The application of these comprehensive rules will make it more difficult for broker-dealers to sell our common stock and our shareholders, therefore, may have difficulty in selling their shares in the secondary trading market.

Our stock price may be volatile and your investment in our common stock could suffer a decline in value.

As of October 26, 2010, there has been no trading activities in the Company’s common stock. There can be no assurance that a market will ever develop in the Company’s common stock in the future. If a market does not develop then investors would be unable to sell any of the Company’s common stock likely resulting in a complete loss of any funds therein invested.

Should a market develop, the price may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include:

• acceptance of our products in the industry;

• announcements of technological innovations or new products by us or our competitors;

• developments or disputes concerning patent or proprietary rights;

• economic conditions in China and or abroad;

• actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results;

• broad market fluctuations; and

• changes in financial estimates by securities analysts.

A registration of a significant amount of our outstanding restricted stock may have a negative effect on the trading price of our stock.

At October 31, 2010, shareholders of the Company had approximately 32,400,000 post-split adjusted shares of restricted stock, or 90% of the outstanding common stock. If we were to file a registration statement including all of these shares, and the registration is allowed by the SEC, these shares would be freely tradable upon the effectiveness of the planned registration statement. If investors holding a significant number of freely tradable shares decide to sell them in a short period of time following the effectiveness of a registration statement, such sales could contribute to significant downward pressure on the price of our stock.

We do not intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future and, therefore, any return on your investment in our capital stock must come from increases in the fair market value and trading price of the capital stock.

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock and do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain future earnings, if any, for reinvestment in the development and expansion of our business. Any credit agreements, which we may enter into with institutional lenders, may restrict our ability to pay dividends. Whether we pay cash dividends in the future will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will be dependent upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and any other factors that the board of directors decides is relevant. Therefore, any return on your investment in our capital stock must come from increases in the fair market value and trading price of the capital stock.

We may issue additional equity shares to fund the Company's operational requirements which would dilute your share ownership.

The Company's continued viability depends on its ability to raise capital. Changes in economic, regulatory or competitive conditions may lead to cost increases. Management may also determine that it is in the best interest of the Company to develop new services or products. In any such case additional financing is required for the Company to meet its operational requirements. There can be no assurances that the Company will be able to obtain such financing on terms acceptable to the Company and at times required by the Company, if at all. In such event, the Company may be required to materially alter its business plan or curtail all or a part of its operational plans as detailed further in Management's Discussion and Analysis in this Form 10-K. While the Company currently has no offers to sell it securities to obtain financing, sale or the proposed sale of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public markets may adversely affect the market price of our common stock and our stock price may decline substantially. In the event that the Company is unable to raise or borrow additional funds, the Company may be required to curtail significantly its operational plans as further detailed in Requirements for Additional Capital in the Management Discussion and Analysis of this Form 10-K.

The Company has been authorized to amend its Articles of Incorporation to issue up to 300,000,000,000 shares of Common Stock without additional approval by shareholders. As of October 31, 2010, we had 36,000,000 post-split adjusted shares of common stock outstanding.

Because our common stock is quoted only on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board, your ability to sell your shares in the secondary trading market may be limited.

Our common stock is quoted only on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board. Consequently, the liquidity of our common stock is impaired, not only in the number of shares that are bought and sold, but also through delays in the timing of transactions, and coverage by security analysts and the news media, if any, of our company. As a result, prices for shares of our common stock may be different than might otherwise prevail if our common stock was quoted or traded on a national securities exchange such as the New York Stock Exchange.

Large amounts of our common stock will be eligible for resale under Rule 144.

As of October 26, 2010, approximately 32,400,000 of the 36,000,000 issued and outstanding post-split shares of the Company's common stock are restricted securities as defined under Rule 144 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) and under certain circumstances may be resold without registration pursuant to Rule 144.

In general, under Rule 144, a person (or persons whose shares are aggregated) who has satisfied a six month holding period may, under certain circumstances, sell within any three-month period a number of securities which does not exceed the greater of 1% of the then outstanding shares of common stock or the average weekly trading volume of the class during the four calendar weeks prior to such sale. Rule 144 also permits, under certain circumstances, the sale of securities, without any limitation, by a person who is not an Affiliate, as such term is defined in Rule 144(a)(1), of the Company and who has satisfied a one year holding period. Any substantial sale of the Company's common stock pursuant to Rule 144 may have an adverse effect on the market price of the Company's shares. This filing will satisfy certain public information requirements necessary for such shares to be sold under Rule 144.

The requirements of complying with the Sarbanes-Oxley act may strain our resources and distract management

We are subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. The costs associated with these requirements may place a strain on our systems and resources. The Exchange Act requires that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and financial condition. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting. Historically, as a private company we have maintained a small accounting staff, but in order to maintain and improve the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting, significant additional resources and management oversight will be required. This includes, among other things, retaining independent public accountants. This effort may divert management's attention from other business concerns, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. In addition, we may need to hire additional accounting and financial persons with appropriate public company experience and technical accounting knowledge, and we cannot assure you that we will be able to do so in a timely fashion.

Our executive officers, directors and principal stockholders control our business and may make decisions that are not in our stockholders' best interests.

As of October 31, 2010 our officers, directors, and principal stockholders, and their affiliates, in the aggregate, beneficially owned approximately 90% of the outstanding shares of our common stock on a fully diluted basis. As a result, such persons, acting together, have the ability to substantially influence all matters submitted to our stockholders for approval, including the election and removal of directors and any merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets, and to control our management and affairs. Accordingly, such concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in discouraging a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of our business, even if such a transaction would be beneficial to other stockholders.

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

The Company’s production factory is located in ShuShan District in HeFei City. The production facilities cover 36 different equipments and platforms at value of 5.1 million RMB. The Company’s office is located in the High-tech Zone in HeFei City. Total area of 800 square meters which values 7.6 million RMB.

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Company is not a party to any pending legal proceedings, and no such proceedings are known to be contemplated.

No director, officer, or affiliate of the Company and no owner of record or beneficial owner of more than 5.0% of the securities of the Company, or any associate of any such director, officer or security holder is a party adverse to the Company or has a material interest adverse to the Company in reference to pending litigation.

ITEM 4.

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

On October 18, 2010, John David Palmer, formerly the sole member of our Board of Directors and majority shareholder, authorized the Certificate of Amendment of the Articles of Incorporation of Eco Energy Pumps, Inc. to amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to: (i) change the name of the Company to “DLT International, Ltd.” (the “Name Change”) (ii) increase the number of the Company’s authorized shares of capital stock from 75,000,000 shares to 310,000,000 of which 300,000,000 shares will be common stock par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”) and 10,000,000 shares will be preferred stock par value $0.001 per share (the “Preferred Stock”) (the “Authorized Stock Increase”); (iii) effectuate a forward stock split of our issued and outstanding Common Stock by changing and reclassifying each 1 share of our issued and outstanding Common Stock into fourteen 14 and 29/100 (14.29) fully paid and non-assessable shares of Common Stock (“Forward Split”); and (iv) authorize the Board of Directors to provide for the issuance of shares of preferred stock in series and, by filing a certificate pursuant to the Nevada Revised Statutes (hereinafter, along with any similar designation relating to any other class of stock that may hereafter be authorized, referred to as a “Preferred Stock Designation”), to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in each such series, and to fix the designation, power, preferences and rights of the shares of each such series and the qualifications, limitations and restrictions thereof (the “Blank Check Preferred Stock”) (the Name Change, Authorized Stock Increase, Forward Split and creation of Blank Check Preferred Stock are collectively referred to as the “Amendments”).

PART II

Item 5	Market for the Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	5
Item 6	Selected Financial Data	5
Item 7	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation	5
Item 7A	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk	6
Item 8	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	6
Item 9	Changes an Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	22
Item 9A	Controls and Procedures	22
Item 9A(T)	Controls and Procedures	23
Item 9B	Other Information	24

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

~~PART~~Market ~~III~~for Our Common Stock

Item 10	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	25
Item 11	Executive Compensation	26
Item 12	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management	27
Item 13	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence	27
Item 14	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	27

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the high and low closing prices of our common stock. These prices reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.

	Closing Prices (1)
	High		Low
Year Ended October 31, 2010
1st Quarter	$	0	$	0
2nd Quarter	$	0	$	0
3rd Quarter	$	0	$	0
4th Quarter	$	0	$	0

Year Ended October 31, 2009
1st Quarter	$	0	$	0
2nd Quarter	$	0	$	0
3rd Quarter	$	0	$	0
4th Quarter	$	0	$	0

(1)	The above tables set forth the range of high and low closing prices per share of our common stock as reported by OTC Bulletin Board and the Pink Sheets, as applicable, for the periods indicated.

Approximate Number of Holders of Our Common Stock

On October 31, 2010, there were approximately 33 stockholders of record of our common stock.

Dividend Policy

The Company has not declared or paid cash dividends or made distributions in the past, and we do not anticipate that we will pay cash dividends or make distributions in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain and reinvest future earnings, if any, to finance our operations.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities.

Since inception of the Company on October 14, 2008, the Company sold the following unregistered securities:

On November 6, 2008, we issued 9,300,000 shares of Common Stock to John David Palmer, who at the time was our sole Officer and Director, for total consideration of $9,300, or $0.001 per share.

On October 25, 2010, the Registrant authorized the issuances of 2,267,320 shares of Common Stock in connection with the execution of a Securities Exchange Agreement with DLT International Limited.

Except as noted above, the sales of the securities identified above were made pursuant to privately negotiated transactions that did not involve a public offering of securities and, accordingly, we believe that these transactions were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act pursuant to Section 4(2) thereof and rules promulgated thereunder. Each of the above-referenced investors in our stock represented to us in connection with their investment that they were “accredited investors” (as defined by Rule 501 under the Securities Act) and were acquiring the shares for investment and not distribution, that they could bear the risks of the investment and could hold the securities for an indefinite period of time. The investors received written disclosures that the securities had not been registered under the Securities Act and that any resale must be made pursuant to a registration or an available exemption from such registration. All of the foregoing securities are deemed restricted securities for purposes of the Securities Act.

Repurchase of Equity Securities.

The Company did not repurchase any of its equity securities that were registered under Section 12 of the Securities Act during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

We currently do not have any equity compensation plans.

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not applicable.

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

This Annual Report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. These include statements about our expectations, beliefs, intentions or strategies for the future, which we indicate by words or phrases such as "anticipate," "expect," "intend," "plan," "will," "we believe," "management believes" and similar language. The forward-looking statements are based on the current expectations of the Company and are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions, including those set forth in the discussion under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in this report. Actual results may differ materially from results anticipated in these forward-looking statements. We base the forward-looking statements on information currently available to us, and we assume no obligation to update them.

Investors are also advised to refer to the information in our previous filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), especially on Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K, in which we discuss in more detail various important factors that could cause actual results to differ from expected or historic results. It is not possible to foresee or identify all such factors. As such, investors should not consider any list of such factors to be an exhaustive statement of all risks and uncertainties or potentially inaccurate assumptions.

Results of Operations

Eco Energy Pumps, Inc. (“the Company”) was incorporated as a for-profit company in the State of Nevada on October 14, 2008 and established a fiscal year end of October 31.

On October 25, 2010, the Company acquired DLT International Limited., DLT International Limited (the “DLT”) was incorporated under the laws of the British Virgin Islands on March 18, 2010 and currently operates through one operating company located in People’s Republic of China (the PRC): Dalei Automobile Testing Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. (“Dalei”). Dalei was incorporated under the laws of the PRC as a limited company on June 3, 2010. Dalei is a vehicle inspecting technology provider in the PRC.

From March 18, 2010 (inception) to October 31, 2010, we generated revenues of $6,638,632 from the sales of vehicle inspecting machines to a number of customers.

Our gross profit margin during the period from March 18, 2010 (inception) to October 31, 2010 was 49.20%. During the year ended October 31, 2010, our cost of sales of testing equipment consists of purchasing machinery and equipment, outsourced instrumentation and control pane, software, freight, and installation.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the period from March 18, 2010 (inception) to October 31, 2010 were $1,188,948 or 17.91% of net sales. Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of payroll.

Income from operations for the period from March 18, 2010 (inception) to October 31, 2010 was $2,077,179, and net income after income taxes for the same period was $1,557,885.

Our business operates primarily in Chinese Renminbi (“RMB”), but we report our results in our SEC filings in U.S. Dollars. The conversion of our accounts from RMB to Dollars results in translation adjustments. While our net income is added to the retained earnings on our balance sheet; the translation adjustments are added to a line item on our balance sheet labeled “accumulated other comprehensive income,” since it is more reflective of changes in the relative values of U.S. and Chinese currencies than of the success of our business. During the period from March 18, 2010 (inception) to October 31, 2010, the effect of converting our financial results to Dollars was to add $75,746 to our accumulated other comprehensive income.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our principal liquidity requirements are for working capital, capital expenditures and cash dividends. We fund our liquidity requirements primarily through cash on hand, and cash flow from operations. We believe our cash on hand, future funds from operations and borrowings from our related parties will be sufficient to fund our cash requirements for at least the next twelve months.

We ended fiscal 2010 with $9,106 of cash and cash equivalents. The following table sets forth a summary of our cash flows for the periods indicated:

Year Ended October 31,	2010

Net cash provided by operating activities	$	161,990
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,577,178	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,424,189
Effect of foreign currency translation		105

Net change in cash	$	9,106

Operating Activities – For the fiscal period ended October 31, 2010, net cash used in operating activities was $161,990. This is primarily attributable to our net income of $1,557,885, offset by a $1,430,796 increase in working capital. Specifically, the working capital increase was primarily due to (i) a $2,703,757 increase in net trade receivables; (ii) a $215,886 increase in prepaid expenses; (iii) a $28,282 increase in sales commission payable; (iv) a $32,950 increase in trade payables; (v) a $1,099,918 increase in VAT payables and (vi) $519,295 increase in income tax payables.

Investing Activities – Net cash used in investing activities for fiscal year 2010 was $1,577,178. Capital expenditures represented substantially all of the net cash used in investing activities for each period. Capital expenditures primarily include our purchases of property, plant and equipment.

Financing Activities – Net cash proceeds from financing activities for fiscal 2010 was $1,424,189. All of our cash from financing activities are the proceeds from the issue of capital.

Future Capital Requirements – We had cash on hand of $9,106 at October 31, 2010. We did not expect any material capital expenditures for fiscal 2011.

We believe we will be able to fund our cash requirements, for at least the next twelve months, from cash on hand, and operating cash flows. However, our ability to satisfy our cash requirements depends upon our future performance, which in turn is subject to general economic conditions and regional risks, and to financial, business and other factors affecting our operations, including factors beyond our control.

If we are unable to generate sufficient cash flow from operations to meet our obligations and commitments, we will be required to refinance or restructure our indebtedness or raise additional debt or equity capital. Additionally, we may be required to sell material assets or operations, suspend or further reduce dividend payments or delay or forego expansion opportunities. We might not be able to implement successful alternative strategies on satisfactory terms, if at all.

Capital Expenditure

We did not have any capital expenditures during the period from March 18, 2010 (inception) to October 31, 2010.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

This discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based on our financial statements that have been prepared under accounting principle generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents include cash and all highly liquid instruments with original maturities of three months or less.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are carried at original invoice amount less estimates made for doubtful receivables. Management determines the allowance for doubtful accounts at the end of the period based on a review of the current status of existing receivables, account aging, historical collection experience, subsequent collections, management's evaluation of the effect of existing economic conditions, and other known factors. The provision is provided for the above estimates made for all doubtful receivables. Account balances are charged off against the allowance only when the Company considers it is probable that a receivable will not be recovered. Recoveries of trade receivables previously written off are recorded when received.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

ASC 105, Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“ASC 105”) (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162) reorganized by topic existing accounting and reporting guidance issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) into a single source of authoritative generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) to be applied by nongovernmental entities. All guidance contained in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) carries an equal level of authority. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. Accordingly, all other accounting literature will be deemed “non-authoritative”. ASC 105 is effective on a prospective basis for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The Company has implemented the guidance included in ASC 105 as of July 1, 2009. The implementation of this guidance changed the Company’s references to GAAP authoritative guidance but did not impact the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

ASC 855, Subsequent Events (“ASC 855”) (formerly Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 165, Subsequent Events) includes guidance that was issued by the FASB in May 2009, and is consistent with current auditing standards in defining a subsequent event. Additionally, the guidance provides for disclosure regarding the existence and timing of a company’s evaluation of its subsequent events. ASC 855 defines two types of subsequent events, “recognized” and “non-recognized”. Recognized subsequent events provide additional evidence about conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet and are required to be reflected in the financial statements. Non-recognized subsequent events provide evidence about conditions that did not exist at the date of the balance sheet but arose after that date and, therefore; are not required to be reflected in the financial statements. However, certain non-recognized subsequent events may require disclosure to prevent the financial statements from being misleading. This guidance was effective prospectively for interim or annual financial periods ending after June 15, 2009. The Company implemented the guidance included in ASC 855 as of April 1, 2009. The effect of implementing this guidance was not material to the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

ASC 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”) (formerly included under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations) contains guidance that was issued by the FASB in December 2007. It requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a transaction at the acquisition-date fair value, with certain exceptions. Additionally, the guidance requires changes to the accounting treatment of acquisition related items, including, among other items, transaction costs, contingent consideration, restructuring costs, indemnification assets and tax benefits. ASC 805 also provides for a substantial number of new disclosure requirements. ASC 805 also contains guidance that was formerly issued as FSP FAS 141(R)-1, Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies which was intended to provide additional guidance clarifying application issues regarding initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosure of assets and liabilities arising from contingencies in a business combination. ASC 805 was effective for business combinations initiated on or after the first annual reporting period beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company implemented this guidance effective January 1, 2009. Implementing this guidance did not have an effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations; however it will likely have an impact on the Company’s accounting for future business combinations, but the effect is dependent upon acquisitions, if any, that are made in the future.

ASC 810, Consolidation (“ASC 810”) includes new guidance issued by the FASB in December 2007 governing the accounting for and reporting of noncontrolling interests (previously referred to as minority interests). This guidance established reporting requirements which include, among other things, that noncontrolling interests be reflected as a separate component of equity, not as a liability. It also requires that the interests of the parent and the noncontrolling interest be clearly identifiable. Additionally, increases and decreases in a parent’s ownership interest that leave control intact shall be reflected as equity transactions, rather than step acquisitions or dilution gains or losses. This guidance also requires changes to the presentation of information in the financial statements and provides for additional disclosure requirements. ASC 810 was effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company implemented this guidance as of January 1, 2009. The effect of implementing this guidance was not material to the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”) (formerly included under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157, Fair Value Measurements) includes guidance that was issued by the FASB in September 2006 that created a common definition of fair value to be used throughout generally accepted accounting principles. ASC 820 applies whenever other standards require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value, with certain exceptions. This guidance established a hierarchy for determining fair value which emphasizes the use of observable market data whenever available. It also required expanded disclosures which include the extent to which assets and liabilities are measured at fair value, the methods and assumptions used to measure fair value and the effect of fair value measures on earnings. ASC 820 also provides additional guidance for estimating fair value when the volume and level of activity for the asset or liability have significantly decreased. The emphasis of ASC 820 is that fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between willing market participants, under current market conditions. ASC 820 also further clarifies the guidance to be considered when determining whether or not a transaction is orderly and clarifies the valuation of securities in markets that are not active. This guidance includes information related to a company’s use of judgment, in addition to market information, in certain circumstances to value assets which have inactive markets.

Fair value guidance in ASC 820 was initially effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and for interim periods within those fiscal years for financial assets and liabilities. The effective date of ASC 820 for all non-recurring fair value measurements of nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities was fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. Guidance related to fair value measurements in an inactive market was effective in October 2008 and guidance related to orderly transactions under current market conditions was effective for interim and annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2009.

The Company applied the provisions of ASC 820 to its financial assets and liabilities upon adoption at January 1, 2008 and adopted the remaining provisions relating to certain nonfinancial assets and liabilities on January 1, 2009. The difference between the carrying amounts and fair values of those financial instruments held upon initial adoption, on January 1, 2008, was recognized as a cumulative effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings and was not material to the Company’s financial position or results of operations. The Company implemented the guidance related to orderly transactions under current market conditions as of April 1, 2009, which also was not material to the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In August 2009, the FASB issued ASC Update No. 2009-05, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Measuring Liabilities at Fair Value (“ASC Update No. 2009-05”). This update amends ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures and provides further guidance on measuring the fair value of a liability. The guidance establishes the types of valuation techniques to be used to value a liability when a quoted market price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, such as the use of an identical or similar liability when traded as an asset. The guidance also further clarifies that a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability at the measurement date and the quoted price for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are both Level 1 fair value measurements. If adjustments are required to be applied to the quoted price, it results in a level 2 or 3 fair value measurement. The guidance provided in the update is effective for the first reporting period (including interim periods) beginning after issuance. The Company does not expect that the implementation of ASC Update No. 2009-05 will have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations.

In September 2009, the FASB issued ASC Update No. 2009-12, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Investments in Certain Entities that Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent) (“ASC Update No. 2009-12”). This update sets forth guidance on using the net asset value per share provided by an investee to estimate the fair value of an alternative investment. Specifically, the update permits a reporting entity to measure the fair value of this type of investment on the basis of the net asset value per share of the investment (or its equivalent) if all or substantially all of the underlying investments used in the calculation of the net asset value is consistent with ASC 820. The update also requires additional disclosures by each major category of investment, including, but not limited to, fair value of underlying investments in the major category, significant investment strategies, redemption restrictions, and unfunded commitments related to investments in the major category. The amendments in this update are effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009 with early application permitted. The Company does not expect that the implementation of ASC Update No. 2009-12 will have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations.

In June 2009, FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (“Statement No. 167”). Statement No. 167 amends FASB Interpretation No. 46R, Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities an interpretation of ARB No. 51 (“FIN 46R”) to require an analysis to determine whether a company has a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. This analysis identifies the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity as the enterprise that has a) the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and b) the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. The statement requires an ongoing assessment of whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity when the holders of the entity, as a group, lose power, through voting or similar rights, to direct the actions that most significantly affect the entity’s economic performance. This statement also enhances disclosures about a company’s involvement in variable interest entities. Statement No. 167 is effective as of the beginning of the first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009. Although Statement No. 167 has not been incorporated into the Codification, in accordance with ASC 105, the standard shall remain authoritative until it is integrated. The Company does not expect the adoption of Statement No. 167 to have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140 (“Statement No. 166”). Statement No. 166 revises FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Extinguishment of Liabilities a replacement of FASB Statement 125 (“Statement No. 140”) and requires additional disclosures about transfers of financial assets, including securitization transactions, and any continuing exposure to the risks related to transferred financial assets. It also eliminates the concept of a “qualifying special-purpose entity”, changes the requirements for derecognizing financial assets, and enhances disclosure requirements. Statement No. 166 is effective prospectively, for annual periods beginning after November 15, 2009, and interim and annual periods thereafter. Although Statement No. 166 has not been incorporated into the Codification, in accordance with ASC 105, the standard shall remain authoritative until it is integrated. The Company does not expect the adoption of Statement No. 166 will have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

Impact of Accounting Pronouncements

There were no recent accounting pronouncements that have had a material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY FINANCIAL DATA

Consolidated Financial Statements

The full text of our audited consolidated financial statements as of October 31, 2010, and 2009 begins on page F-1 of this Report.

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

On January 3, 2011, the Board of Directors of the Registrant dismissed its independent registered public accounting firm, Seale and Beers, CPAs (“Seale and Beers”). None of the reports of Seale & Beers on the Registrant’s financial statements for either of the past two years and the interim period from October 31, 2009, the date of the last audited financial statements, through July 31, 2010, contained an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion, or was qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles, except that the Registrant's audited financial statements contained in its Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2009 contained a going concern qualification in the Registrant's audited financial statements.

During the Registrant's most recent fiscal years and the subsequent interim period through January 3, 2011, the date of dismissal, there were no disagreements with Seale and Beers on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure which, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Seale and Beers, would have caused it to make reference to the matter in connection with its reports. There were no "reportable events" in connection with its report on the Registrant’s financial statements.

On January 4, 2011, the Registrant approved the engagement Albert Wong & Co. (“Wong & Co.”) as its new independent registered public accountants. The Registrant did not consult Wong & Co. regarding either: (i) the application of accounting principles to a specified transaction, completed or proposed, or the type of audit opinion that might be rendered on the Registrant's financial statements, or (ii) any matter that was either the subject of a disagreement or a reportable event in connection with its report on the Registrant’s financial statements.

The Registrant has made the contents of its Form 8-K available to Seale and Beers and requested it to furnish a letter to the Commission as to whether Seale and Beers agrees or disagrees with, or wishes to clarify the Registrant's expression of their views. A copy of the letter dated January 3, 2011 furnished by Seale & Beers in response to that request is filed as Exhibit 16.1 to the Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2011.

ITEM 9A(T).

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial report for the company (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Internal control over financial reporting is to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Internal control over financial reporting includes maintain records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions; providing reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary for preparation of our financial statements; providing reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures of company assets are made in accordance with management authorization; and providing reasonable assurance that unauthorized acquisition , use or disposition of company assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements would be prevented or detected.

As of October 31, 2010, management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in SEC guidance on conducting such assessments. Based on this evaluation under the COSO Framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting are not effective as of October 31, 2010. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on that evaluation, they concluded that, during the period covered by this report, such internal controls and procedures were not effective to detect the inappropriate application of US GAAP rules as more fully described below. This was due to deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of our internal control over financial reporting that adversely affected our internal controls and that may be considered to be material weaknesses.

The matters involving internal controls and procedures that the Company’s management considered to be material weaknesses under the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board were: (1) lack of a functioning audit committee and lack of a majority of outside directors on the Company's board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; (2) inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives; (3) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of US GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements; and (4) ineffective controls over period end financial disclosure and reporting processes. The aforementioned material weaknesses were identified by the Company's Chief Financial Officer in connection with the review of our financial statements as of October 31, 2010 and communicated to our management.

Management believes that the material weaknesses set forth in items (2), (3) and (4) above did not have an affect on the Company's financial results. However, management believes that the lack of a functioning audit committee and lack of a majority of outside directors on the Company's board of directors, resulting in ineffective oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures can result in the Company's determination to its financial statements for the future years.

We are committed to improving our financial organization. As part of this commitment, we will create a position to segregate duties consistent with control objectives and will increase our personnel resources and technical accounting expertise within the accounting function when funds are available to the Company: i) Appointing one or more outside directors to our board of directors who shall be appointed to the audit committee of the Company resulting in a fully functioning audit committee who will undertake the oversight in the establishment and monitoring of required internal controls and procedures; and ii) Preparing and implementing sufficient written policies and checklists which will set forth procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of US GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements.

Management believes that the appointment of more outside directors, who shall be appointed to a fully functioning audit committee, will remedy the lack of a functioning audit committee and a lack of a majority of outside directors on the Company's Board. In addition, management believes that preparing and implementing sufficient written policies and checklists will remedy the following material weaknesses (i) insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of US GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements; and (ii) ineffective controls over period end financial close and reporting processes. Further, management believes that the hiring of additional personnel who have the technical expertise and knowledge will result proper segregation of duties and provide more checks and balances within the department. Additional personnel will also provide the cross training needed to support the Company if personnel turn over issues within the department occur. This coupled with the appointment of additional outside directors will greatly decrease any control and procedure issues the company may encounter in the future.

We will continue to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls and procedures and our internal controls over financial reporting on an ongoing basis and are committed to taking further action and implementing additional enhancements or improvements, as necessary and as funds allow.

There have been no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended October 31, 2010 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide management report in the Annual Report.

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

The following table sets forth: (1) names and ages of all persons who presently are and who have been selected as directors and executive officers of the Registrant; (2) all positions and offices with the Registrant held by each such person; (3) any period during which he or she has served a such. All directors hold office until the next annual meeting of our shareholders and until their successors have been elected and qualify. Officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors.

Name (1)	Age	Title
XiuLiang Zhang	33	Chairman, President
Jun Liu	40	Chief Executive Officer, Director
Zheng Ying Li	40	Chief Financial Officer, Officer

Xiu Liang Zhang. Chairman, President. Since March 18, 2010, Mr. Zhang has served as a Director of DLT International Limited. In that capacity he serves as its highest decision maker and is responsible for making the operating policies and developing plans, regulating and supervising the business activities, review and approval of its financial budget and accounts. Mr. Zhang has over 20 years of experience in the industry. Since 1989, Mr. Zhang has been in the field of motor vehicle testing, research and development. In 1995 he founded the DLT Group, in which he served as the Chairman of the Company leading the Company into becoming the leading brand in the national industry. Prior thereto, Mr. Zhang served as director for the Department of Radio Engineering for the China Science and Technology University. Mr. Zhang is the Executive Vice-Chairman of China Auto Back Market League, Chairman of the Committee of Experts, Director of China Automotive Maintenance Association and China Automotive Maintenance Equipment Association. Mr. Zhang graduated with a degree in Radio Engineering from China Science and Technology University

Jun Liu. Chief Executive Officer, Director. Since January 2006, Mr. Liu has been the General Manager of DLT Group. Since March 18, 2010, Mr. Liu has served as Chief Executive Officer of the Company. From 1998 to 2003, Mr. Liu served as Deputy General Manager of DLT (ShenZhen) Co., Ltd. From March 2003 to January 2006, Mr. Liu served as General Manager for DLT (HeFei) Co., Ltd. Mr. Liu is a Senior Engineer, Senior Expert of the Chinese Equipment Project Expert Committee. Mr. Liu graduated from China Science and Technology University in 1995. Mr. Liu has taught classes at China Science and Technology University during 1991 – 1998 and has also been involved in the research of motor vehicle testing. Mr. Liu received a master’s degree in Business Management.

ZhengYing Li. Chief Financial Officer, Director. Since March 18, 2010, Mr. Li has served as Chief Financial Officer of DLT. From 2006 to present, Mr. Li has been Deputy Manager and Chief Finance Officer in charge of the finance sector for Dalei. From 1988 to 2006, Mr. Li served as Chief Finance Officer for the AnHui Silk Knitting Factory (a large state-owned enterprise). Mr. Li graduated from AnHui Institute of Finance and Economics in 1988.

AUDIT COMMITTEE. The Company intends to establish an audit committee, which will consist of independent directors. The audit committee's duties would be to recommend to the Company's board of directors the engagement of independent auditors to audit the Company's financial statements and to review its accounting and auditing principles. The audit committee would review the scope, timing and fees for the annual audit and the results of audit examinations performed by the internal auditors and independent public accountants, including their recommendations to improve the system of accounting and internal controls. The audit committee would at all times be composed exclusively of directors who are, in the opinion of the Company's board of directors, free from any relationship which would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment as a committee member and who possess an understanding of financial statements and generally accepted accounting principles.

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE. Our board of directors does not have a standing compensation committee responsible for determining executive and director compensation. Instead, the entire board of directors fulfills this function, and each member of the Board participates in the determination. Given the small size of the Company and its Board and the Company's limited resources, locating, obtaining and retaining additional independent directors is extremely difficult. In the absence of independent directors, the Board does not believe that creating a separate compensation committee would result in any improvement in the compensation determination process. Accordingly, the board of directors has concluded that the Company and its stockholders would be best served by having the entire board of directors act in place of a compensation committee. When acting in this capacity, the Board does not have a charter.

In considering and determining executive and director compensation, our board of directors reviews compensation that is paid by other similar public companies to its officers and takes that into consideration in determining the compensation to be paid to the Company’s officers. The board of directors also determines and approves any non-cash compensation to any employee. The Company does not engage any compensation consultants to assist in determining or recommending the compensation to the Company’s officers or employees.

Section 16(A) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Under U.S. securities laws, directors, certain executive officers and persons holding more than 10% of our common stock must report their initial ownership of the common stock, and any changes in that ownership, to the SEC. The SEC has designated specific due dates for these reports.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To the best of our knowledge, none of our directors or executive officers has been convicted in a criminal proceeding, excluding traffic violations or similar misdemeanors, or has been a party to any judicial or administrative proceeding during the past five years that resulted in a judgment, decree or final order enjoining the person from future violations of, or prohibiting activities subject to, federal or state securities laws (except where not subsequently dismissed without sanction or settlement), or from engaging in any type of business practice, or a finding of any violation of federal or state securities laws. To the best of our knowledge, no petition under the federal bankruptcy laws or any state insolvency law was filed by or against, or a receiver, fiscal agent or similar officer was appointed by a court for the business or property of any of our directors or officers, or any partnership in which any of our directors or officers was a general partner at or within two years before the time of such filing, or any corporation or business association of which any of our directors or officers was an executive officer at or within two years before the time of such filing. Except as set forth in our discussion below in “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence,” none of our directors, director nominees or executive officers has been involved in any transactions with us or any of our directors, executive officers, affiliates or associates which are required to be disclosed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC.

Code of Ethics

The Board of Directors has not adopted a code of ethics applicable to the Company’s executive officers. The Board believes that the small number of individuals involved in the Company’s management makes such a code unnecessary.

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth all of the compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to (i) each individual serving as our principal executive officer during our last completed fiscal year; and (ii) each other individual that served as an executive officer at the conclusion of the fiscal year ended December 31 and who received in excess of $100,000 in the form of salary and bonus during such fiscal year (collectively, the Named Executives).

Name and Principal Position	Year	Salary	Bonus	Option Awards	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation	All Other Compensation	Total
XiuLiang Zhang	2010	-	-	-	-	-	-
	2009	-	-	-	-	-	-
	2008	-	-	-	-	-	-
Jun Liu	2010	-	-	-	-	-	-
	2009	-	-	-	-	-	-
	2008
ZhengYing Li	2010	-	-	-	-	-	-
	2009	-	-	-	-	-	-
	2008	-	-	-	-	-	-
John David Palmer	2010	-	-	-	-	-	-
	2009	-	-	-	-	-	-
	2008	-	-	-	-	-	-
Jeannette Aparecida da Silva	2010	-	-	-	-	-	-
	2009	-	-	-	-	-	-
	2008	-	-	-	-	-	-

Compensation Policy. Our Company’s executive compensation plan is based on attracting and retaining qualified professionals who possess the skills and leadership necessary to enable our Company to achieve earnings and profitability growth to satisfy our stockholders. We must, therefore, create incentives for these executives to achieve both Company and individual performance objectives through the use of performance-based compensation programs. No one component is considered by itself, but all forms of the compensation package are considered in total. Wherever possible, objective measurements will be utilized to quantify performance, but many subjective factors still come into play when determining performance.

Compensation Components. As an early-stage development company, the main elements of our compensation package consist of base salary, stock options and bonus.

Base Salary. As we continue to grow and financial conditions improve, these base salaries, bonuses and incentive compensation will be reviewed for possible adjustments. Base salary adjustments will be based on both individual and Company performance and will include both objective and subjective criteria specific to each executive’s role and responsibility with the Company.

COMPENSATION OF DIRECTORS

At this time, directors receive no remuneration for their services as directors of the Company, nor does the Company reimburse directors for expenses incurred in their service to the Board of Directors. The Company does not expect to pay any fees to its directors for the 2010 fiscal year.

EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS, TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT AND CHANGE-IN-CONTROL ARRANGEMENTS

We do not have employment agreements with any of our officers, directors or key personnel. The Company’s principal operating subsidiary, Dalei Automotive Testing Technology (Shenzhen) Co., Ltd. has employment agreements with the following persons: Xiu Liang Zhang, to serve as Chairman of the Board and President, executed on June 3, 2010 for a one year term, subject to automatic renewals of one year at the rate of $30,000 per year; Jun Liu, as Chief Executive Officer, executed on June 3, 2010 for a one year term, subject to automatic renewals of one year at the rate of $30,000 per year; and Zheng Ying Li, as Chief Financial Officer, executed on June 3, 2010 for a one year term, subject to automatic renewals of one year at the rate of $30,000 per year.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth for each named executive officer certain information concerning the outstanding equity awards as of October 31, 2010.

Option awards

Stock awards

Name and Principal Position

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised

Options Exercisable

Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options Unexercisable

Option Exercise Price ($)

Option Expiration Date

Number of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested

Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock that Have Not Vested

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights that Have Not Vested

Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned

Shares, Units or Other Rights that Have Not Vested

XiuLiang Zhang, Chairman, President

—

Jun Liu, Chief Executive Officer

—

ZhengYing Li, Chief Financial Officer

—

John David Palmer, President, Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Chairman *

—

Jeannette Aparecida da Silva, Secretary*

—

*Resigned October 18, 2010

Remuneration of Directors

None of the members of the Board of Directors receives remuneration for service on the Board.

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

The following table summarizes certain information regarding the beneficial ownership (as such term is defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of outstanding Registrant Common Stock as of October 31, 2010 by (i) each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding Common Stock, (ii) each of our directors, (iii) each of our named executive officers, and (iv) all executive officers and directors as a group. Except as indicated in the footnotes below, the security and stockholders listed below possess sole voting and investment power with respect to their shares.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner (1)	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership (2)		Percentage of Class (2)
KME Investments Group Limited		2,267,320		90	%
Xiu Liang Zhang		0		0	%
Jun Liu		0		0	%
Zheng Ying Li		0		0	%
All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group (3 persons)		0		0	%

(1) "Beneficial Owner" means having or sharing, directly or indirectly (i) voting power, which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting, or (ii) investment power, which includes the power to dispose or to direct the disposition, of shares of the common stock of an issuer. The definition of beneficial ownership includes shares, underlying options or warrants to purchase common stock, or other securities convertible into common stock, that currently are exercisable or convertible or that will become exercisable or convertible within 60 days. Unless otherwise indicated, the beneficial owner has sole voting and investment power.

(2) For each shareholder, the calculation of percentage of beneficial ownership is based upon 2,519,320 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of October 26, 2010, and shares of Common Stock subject to options, warrants and/or conversion rights held by the shareholder that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days, which are deemed to be outstanding and to be beneficially owned by the shareholder holding such options, warrants, or conversion rights. The percentage ownership of any shareholder is determined by assuming that the shareholder has exercised all options, warrants and conversion rights to obtain additional securities and that no other shareholder has exercised such rights.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

As of the date of this Form 10-K, the Company has not authorized any equity compensation plan, nor has our Board of Directors authorized the reservation or issuance of any securities under any equity compensation plan.

Changes in Control

There are no arrangements known to us, including any pledge by any person of our securities, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the Company.

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS.

Transactions with Related Persons

None.

Director Independence

Currently, we have no independent directors on our Board of Directors, and therefore have no formal procedures in effect for reviewing and pre-approving any transactions between us, our directors, officers and other affiliates. We will use our best efforts to insure that all transactions are on terms at least as favorable to the Company as we would negotiate with unrelated third parties.

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

	2010		2009
Audit fees(1)	$	10,000	$	10,000
Audit-related fees	$	—	$	—
Tax fees(2)	$	—	$
All other fees	$	—	$	—
Total	$	10,000	$	10,000

______________

(1)	Consists of fees billed for the audit of our annual financial statements, review of financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

(2)	“Tax Fees” consisted of fees billed for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for tax compliance, tax advice, and tax planning.

PART IV

~~Item~~ITEM 15. ~~Exhibits~~EXHIBITS, ~~and~~FINANCIAL ~~Financial~~STATEMENTS ~~Statement Schedules 28~~SCHEDULES.

PART 1

Exhibit No.		Description
31.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

~~Item~~* 1:Filed ~~Business~~herewith

~~Overview~~25

ECO ENERGY PUMPS, INC. (“Eco Energy Pumps, “we”, “the Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on October 14th, 2008, and has a fiscal year end of October 31. We are a development-stage Company that intends to develop an efficient water pump powered by solar energy with an exclusive pump design. This product will be economical, portable and versatile; excellent for using in farms, irrigation, livestock watering and locations without power lines in general, such as remote homes and villages. It will be capable of pumping water from no matter how deep. SIGNATURES

~~The~~Pursuant ~~Company~~to ~~has~~the ~~not~~requirements ~~been~~of ~~involved~~Section 13 inor ~~any~~15(d) ~~bankruptcy,~~of ~~receivership~~the orSecurities ~~similar~~Exchange ~~proceedings~~Act ~~since~~of ~~its~~1934, ~~incorporation~~the ~~nor~~Company has itduly ~~been~~caused ~~involved~~this inreport ~~any~~to ~~reclassification,~~be ~~merger~~signed oron ~~consolidation. We~~its ~~have~~behalf noby ~~plans~~the toundersigned, ~~change~~thereunto ~~our~~duly ~~business activities~~authorized.

General

	ECO ENERGY PUMPS, INC.

	By:	/s/ Jun Liu
		Name: Jun Li
		Title: Chief Executive Officer and Director
		(principal executive officer)

	By:	/s/ Zhengying Li
		Name: Zhengying Li
		Title: Chief Financial Officer and Director
		(principal accounting officer)

		Date: February 14, 2011

Eco Energy Pumps, Inc. plans to produce a water pump that will also be a clean and simple alternative to fuel-burning generators and windmills for locations without power lines. Our pumps will require no fuel deliveries and simple maintenance (4 to 5 years). A solar pump delivers the most water when it is needed the most: when the weather is sunny and dry.26

WeECO ~~have~~ENERGY ~~not~~PUMPS, ~~yet entered into any agreements to manufacture our products yet~~INC.

~~Our~~CONSOLIDATED ~~president~~FINANCIAL and director has invested $9,300 in the Company. A total of 33 other investors have invested a further $5,050 in the Company through the purchase of common shares. At the present time, we have not made any arrangements to raise additional cash. We will need additional cash and if we are unable to raise it, we will either suspend marketing operations until we do raise the cash necessary to continue our business plan, or we cease operations entirely. STATEMENTS

IfFOR weTHE ~~are~~PERIOD ~~unable~~FROM toJUNE ~~complete any phase of our business plan or marketing efforts because we don’t have enough money~~3, we2010 ~~will~~(INCEPTION) ~~cease~~TO ~~our~~OCTOBER ~~development and/or marketing activities until we raise money. Attempting to raise capital after failing in any phase of our business plan would be difficult. As such~~31, ~~if we cannot secure additional funds we will have to cease operations and investors will lose their entire investment.~~2010

~~Plan~~(Stated ofin ~~Operation~~US dollars)

~~Over~~ECO ~~the~~ENERGY ~~12 month period starting upon the end of the sale of our stock~~PUMPS, ~~our company must raise capital and start its sales~~INC. The first stage of our operations over this period is to develop the prototype of our exclusive solar pump system and make all the adjustments necessary to assure high quality. We expect to complete this step within 120 days after we raise enough capital.

The second stage is to develop our company’s website with detailed information and animated demonstrations of our unique pump system. We expect to complete this step in 180 days after we raise enough capital.

CONTENTS	PAGES

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM	1

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET	2 – 3

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	4

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	5

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS	6

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	7 – 15

~~The~~ALBERT ~~third~~WONG ~~stage~~& ~~consists~~CO. inCERTIFIED ~~our~~PUBLIC ~~product~~ACCOUNTANTS ~~Marketing~~7th ~~and~~Floor, ~~Sales~~Nan ~~campaign~~Dao ~~including:~~Commercial ~~finding~~Building ~~a storage space and buying pump supplies; exposition in Trade Shows across North America; distribution of flyers and brochures and demonstration of our products to non~~359-~~governmental~~361 ~~and~~Queen’s ~~governmental~~Road ~~Institutions~~Central ~~that~~Hong ~~are~~Kong ~~funding~~Tel ~~the~~: ~~development~~2851 of7954 ~~extraction~~Fax: ~~and~~2545 ~~delivery~~4086 ofALBERT ~~water~~WONG ~~and~~B.Soc., ~~sanitation~~Sc., inACA., ~~Africa and in development stage countries in general~~LL.B., WeCPA ~~expect to be fully operational within 360 days after we raise enough capital.~~(Practising)

The ~~Company~~board ~~has raised $5,050 in cash to initiate its business plan through the sale~~ of ~~its~~directors ~~common stock. The amount raised from our stock offering is insufficient~~ and weshareholders will need additional cash to continue to implement our business plan. If we are unable to raise it, we will either suspend marketing operations until we do raise the cash, or cease operations entirely. Other than as described in this paragraph, we have no other financing plans.of

IfEco weEnergy ~~are unable to complete any aspect of our development or marketing efforts because we don’t have enough money~~Pumps, ~~we will cease our development and/or marketing operations until we raise money~~Inc. ~~Attempting~~(“the to raise capital after failing in any phase of our business plan would be difficult. As such, if we cannot secure additional proceeds we will have to cease operations and investors would lose their entire investment.Company”)

~~Management~~Report ~~does~~of ~~not~~Independent ~~plan~~Registered toPublic ~~hire~~Accounting additional employees at this time. Our President will be responsible for the initial product sourcing. We intend to hire sales representatives initially on a commission only basis to keep administrative overhead to a minimum. We will use third party web designers to build and maintain our website. Firm

We dohave ~~not~~audited ~~expect~~the toaccompanying beconsolidated ~~purchasing~~balance orsheet ~~selling~~of ~~plant~~Eco orEnergy ~~significant~~Pumps, ~~equipment~~Inc. ~~during~~as of October 31, 2010, and the ~~next~~related ~~twelve~~consolidated ~~months~~statements of income and comprehensive income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the period then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audit.

~~Item~~We 1Aconducted our audit in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those ~~Risk~~standards ~~Factors~~require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

WeIn ~~are~~our aopinion, ~~smaller~~the ~~reporting~~consolidated ~~company~~financial asstatements ~~defined~~referred to above present fairly, in ~~Rule~~all ~~12b-2~~material respects, the consolidated financial position of the ~~Exchange~~Company ~~Act~~as of October 31, 2010 and ~~are~~the ~~not~~results ~~required~~of toits ~~provide~~operations and its cash flows for the ~~information~~period ~~required~~then ~~under~~ended ~~this~~in ~~item~~conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

Hong Kong, China	Albert Wong & Co
January 31, 2011	Certified Public Accountants

~~We are a smaller reporting company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item.~~1

~~Item~~ECO 2ENERGY PUMPS. ~~Properties~~INC. CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET AS AT OCTOBER 31 , 2010 (Stated in US Dollars)

We do not own any real estate or other properties. The Company’s office is located 112 North Curry Street, Carson City, Nevada, 89703.

			2010
	Note
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents			$	9,106
Trade receivables				2,735,326
Receivable from a related company		5		212,671
Other receivables				302,217
Prepaid expenses				218,407
Inventories				13,782
Deposit				2,998


Total current assets			$	3,494,507
Property, plant and equipment, net		4		1,407,458


TOTAL ASSETS			$	4,901,965

LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Trade payables			$	33,335
Advances from customers				32,139
Sale commission payable				28,612
Payables to related parties		5		25,369
Payables to key management		5		34,477
Accrued expenses				15,129
VAT payable				1,112,760
Income tax payables				525,358
Other tax payables				77,893


TOTAL LIABILITIES			$	1,885,072


Commitments and contingencies			$	-

~~Item~~See 3.accompanying ~~Legal~~notes ~~Proceedings~~to consolidated financial statements

~~The Company is not a party to any pending legal proceedings, and no such proceedings are known to be contemplated.~~2

NoECO ~~director,~~ENERGY ~~officer,~~PUMPS. orINC. ~~affiliate~~CONSOLIDATED ofBALANCE ~~the~~SHEET ~~issuer~~(Continued) ~~and~~AS noAT ~~owner~~OCTOBER of31 ~~record or beneficiary of more than 5% of the securities of the issuer~~, or2010 ~~any~~(Stated ~~security~~in ~~holder~~US ~~is a party adverse to the small business issuer or has a material interest adverse to the small business issuer.~~ Dollars)

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

	2010

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Preferred stock at $0.001 par value;
10,000,000 shares authorized
Nil share issued and fully paid	$	-

Common stock at $0.001 par value;
300,000,000 shares authorized;
36,001,083 shares issued
and outstanding at October 31, 2010	$	36,001
Additional paid-in capital		1,347,261
Retained earnings		1,557,885
Accumulated other comprehensive
income		75,746


	$	3,016,893



TOTAL LIABILITIES AND
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	4,901,965

~~None~~See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements

~~PART II~~3

~~Item~~ECO 5ENERGY PUMPS. ~~Market~~INC. ~~for~~CONSOLIDATED ~~Registrants~~STATEMENTS ~~Common~~OF ~~Equity~~INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE PERIOD FROM JUNE 3, ~~Related~~2010 ~~Stockholder~~(INCEPTION) ~~Matters~~TO ~~and~~OCTOBER ~~Issuer~~31, ~~Purchase~~2010 of(Stated ~~Equity~~in ~~Securities~~US Dollars)

As of October 31, 2009 the Company had thirty-three (33) active shareholders of record. The company has not paid cash dividends and has no outstanding options.

			For the period from
			June 3, 2010
			(inception) to
			October 31, 2010
	Note
Net revenues			$	6,638,632
Cost of net revenues				(3,372,505	)


Gross profit			$	3,266,127

Operating expenses:
Selling				(655,425	)
General and administrative				(533,523	)


Income before income taxes			$	2,077,179

Income taxes		7		(519,294	)


Net income			$	1,557,885

Foreign currency translation adjustment				75,746


Comprehensive income			$	1,633,631

Weighted average number of shares outstanding:
Basic and diluted				36,001,083

Earnings per share:
Basic and diluted			$	0.04

~~Item~~See 6.accompanying ~~Selected~~notes ~~Financial~~to ~~Data~~consolidated financial statements

~~We are a smaller reporting company as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information required under this item.~~4

~~Item~~ECO 7ENERGY PUMPS. ~~Management~~INC. ~~Discussion~~CONSOLIDATED ~~and~~STATEMENT ~~Analysis~~OF ofSTOCKHOLDERS’ ~~Financial~~EQUITY ~~Condition~~FOR ~~and~~THE ~~Results~~PERIOD ofFROM ~~Operations~~JUNE 3, 2010 (INCEPTION) TO OCTOBER 31, 2010 (Stated in US Dollars)

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.

								Accumulated
			Additional					other
	Common		paid-in			Retained		comprehensive
	stock		capital			earnings		income		Total

Balance, June 3, 2010	$	32,400		1,373,099			-		-		1,405,499
Reverse merger		3,601		(25,838	)		-		-		(22,237	)
Net income		-		-			1,557,885		-		1,557,885
Foreign currency
translation adjustment		-		-			-		75,746		75,746

Balance, October 31, 2010	$	36,001		1,347,261			1,557,885		75,746		3,016,893

~~This~~See ~~interim~~accompanying ~~report~~notes ~~contains forward looking statements relating~~ to ~~our~~consolidated ~~Company's future economic performance, plans and objectives of management for future operations, projections of revenue mix and other~~ financial items that are based on the beliefs of, as well as assumptions made by and information currently known to, our management. The words "expects”, “intends”, “believes”, “anticipates”, “may”, “could”, “should" and similar expressions and variations thereof are intended to identify forward-looking statements~~. The cautionary statements set forth in this section are intended to emphasize that actual results may differ materially from those contained in any forward looking statement.~~

Our auditor’s report on our October 31, 2009 financial statements expresses an opinion that substantial doubt exists as to whether we can continue as an ongoing business. Since our officer and director may be unwilling or unable to loan or advance us additional capital, we believe that if we do not raise additional capital over the next 12 months, we may be required to suspend or cease the implementation of our business plans. See “October 31, 2009 Audited Financial Statements - Auditors Report.”5

AsECO ofENERGY ~~October 31, 2009, Eco Energy Pumps had $2,799 cash on hand and in the bank~~PUMPS. ~~Management believes this amount will not satisfy our cash requirements for the next twelve months or until such time that additional proceeds are raised~~INC. WeCONSOLIDATED ~~plan~~STATEMENT toOF ~~satisfy~~CASH ~~our~~FLOWS ~~future~~FOR ~~cash~~THE ~~requirements~~PERIOD -FROM ~~primarily~~JUNE ~~the~~3, ~~working~~2010 ~~capital~~(INCEPTION) ~~required~~TO ~~for~~OCTOBER ~~the~~31, ~~development~~2010 of(Stated ~~our course guides and marketing campaign and to offset legal and accounting fees - by additional equity financing. This will likely be~~ in ~~the~~US ~~form of private placements of common stock.~~ Dollars)

Management believes that if subsequent private placements are successful, we will be able to generate sales revenue within the following twelve months thereof. However, additional equity financing may not be available to us on acceptable terms or at all, and thus we could fail to satisfy our future cash requirements.

	For the period from
	June 3, 2010(inception)
	to October 31,2010
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	1,557,885
Depreciation		34,901

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net
cash provided by operating activities:
Trade receivables		(2,703,757	)
Other receivables		(298,729	)
Inventories		(13,623	)
Prepaid expenses		(215,886	)
Sales commission payable		28,282
Trade payables		32,950
Advances from customers		31,768
Accrued expenses		14,955
VAT payables		1,099,918
Income tax payables		519,295
Other tax payables		76,994
Deposit		(2,963	)

Net cash provided by operating activities	$	161,990

Cash flows from investing activities
Purchases of property, plant and equipment	$	(1,426,116	)
Receivable from a related company		(210,217	)
Payables to related parties		25,076
Advances from key management		34,079
Payable to the ultimate shareholder		-

Net cash used in investing activities	$	(1,577,178	)

Cash flows from financing activities
Issue of capital	$	1,424,189

Net cash provided by financing activities	$	1,424,189

Net cash and cash equivalents sourced	$	9,001

Effect of foreign currency translation on cash
and cash equivalents		105

Cash and cash equivalents–end of period	$	9,106

IfSee ~~Eco~~accompanying ~~Energy~~notes ~~Pumps is unsuccessful in raising the additional proceeds through a private placement offering it will then have~~ to ~~seek~~consolidated ~~additional~~financial funds through debt financing, which would be highly difficult for a new development stage company to secure. Therefore, the company is highly dependent upon the success of the anticipated private placement offering and failure thereof would result in Eco Energy Pumps having to seek capital from other sources such as debt financing, which may not even be available to the company. However, if such financing were available, because Eco Energy Pumps is a development stage company with no operations to date, it would likely have to pay additional costs associated with high risk loans and be subject to an above market interest rate. At such time these funds are required, management would evaluate the terms of such debt financing and determine whether the business could sustain operations and growth and manage the debt load. If Eco Energy Pumps cannot raise additional proceeds via a private placement of its common stock or secure debt financing it would be required to cease business operations. As a result, investors in Eco Energy Pumps common stock would lose all of their investment.statements

~~The development and marketing of our products will start over the next 12 months. Eco Energy Pumps does not anticipate obtaining any further products or services.~~ 6

WeECO ~~did~~ENERGY ~~not generate any revenue during the fiscal year ended October 31~~PUMPS, ~~2009~~INC. As of the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009 we had $2,799 of cash on hand in the bank. We incurred operating expenses in the amount of $21,651 in the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009. These operating expenses were comprised of professional fees and office and general expenses. Since inception we have incurred operating expenses of $22,946.

~~Eco~~NOTES ~~Energy~~TO ~~Pumps~~CONSOLIDATED ~~has~~FINANCIAL ~~no current plans, preliminary or otherwise, to merge with any other entity.~~STATEMENTS

~~Off~~FOR ~~Balance~~THE ~~Sheet~~PERIOD ~~Arrangements.~~FROM JUNE 3, 2010 (INCEPTION) TO OCTOBER 31, 2010

As (Stated of the date of this Annual Report, the current funds available to the Company will not be sufficient to continue operations. The cost to establish the Company and begin operations is estimated to be approximately $80,000 over the next twelve months and the cost of maintaining our reporting status is estimated to be $8,000 over this same period. The officer and director, John David Palmer has undertaken to provide the Company with operating capital to sustain our business over the next twelve month period as the expenses are incurred in ~~the~~US form of a non-secured loan. However, there is no contract in place or written agreement securing this agreement. Management believes that if the Company cannot raise sufficient revenues or maintain its reporting status with the SEC it will have to cease all efforts directed towards the Company. As such, any investment previously made would be lost in its entirety. Dollars)

~~Other~~1. ORGANIZATION ~~than~~AND ~~the~~PRINCIPAL above described situation the Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on the Company's financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.ACTIVITIES

~~Item~~Eco 7AEnergy Pumps, Inc. ~~Quantitative~~(“the Company” or “the Group”) was incorporated as a for-profit company in the State of Nevada on October 14, 2008 and ~~Qualitative~~established ~~Disclosures~~a ~~about~~fiscal ~~Market~~year ~~Risk~~end of October 31.

WeOn ~~are~~October 25, 2010, the Company acquired DLT International Limited., a ~~smaller~~privately ~~reporting~~held ~~company~~corporation asorganized ~~defined~~under the laws of the British Virgin Islands (“DLT”), in ~~Rule~~accordance ~~12b-2~~with ofa Securities Exchange Agreement (the “Exchange”). DLT ~~Act~~was organized under the laws of the British Virgin Islands on March 18, 2010. DLT is a holding company whose principal operating company develops, manufactures and ~~are~~distributes ~~not~~automotive ~~required~~testing toequipment ~~provide~~in the ~~information~~People's ~~required~~Republic ~~under~~of ~~this~~China. Upon ~~item~~consummation of the Exchange, the Registrant adopted the business plan of DLT.

~~Item~~Pursuant 8to the terms of the Exchange, the Company acquired DLT in exchange for an aggregate of 2,267,320 newly issued shares (the “Exchange Shares”) of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 ~~Financial~~per ~~Statements~~share (the “Common Stock”) issued to DLT Shareholders in accordance with their pro rata ownership of DLT equity. As a result of the Exchange, DLT became a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. In addition, our principal stockholder agreed to retire their 9,300,000 shares of Common Stock. Following the Exchange, and ~~Supplementary~~upon ~~Data~~giving effect to the Split, the Company had an aggregate of approximately 36,001,083 shares issued and outstanding.

~~SEALE~~On ~~AND~~October ~~BEERS~~18, ~~CPAs~~2010, as a condition precedent to the Exchange, a majority of the Company’s Shareholders voted to amend the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to (i) change its name to DLT International, Ltd. (the “Name Change”), (ii) increase the number of its authorized shares of capital stock from 75,000,000 to 310,000,000 shares of which (a) 300,000,000 shares were designated common stock, par value $0.001 per share and (b)10,000,000 were designated “preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Preferred Stock”), (iii) authorize the creation of a class of 10,000,000 shares of blank check preferred stock, (iv) and to effect a forward-split such that fourteen and 29/100 (14.29) shares of its Common Stock were issued for every 1 share of Common Stock issued and outstanding immediately prior to filing of the Amendment (the “Split”).

~~PCAOB~~Prior &to ~~CPAB~~the ~~REGISTERED~~Exchange, ~~AUDITORS~~we were a development-stage Company that intended to develop an efficient water pump powered by solar energy. As a result of the Exchange with DLT International Limited (“DLT”), we have adopted the business plan of DLT.

~~www~~DLT, through its wholly-owned Chinese subsidiary, Dalei Vehicle Inspecting Technology (Shen Zhen) Co.~~sealebeers~~, Ltd (“Dalei”), is a manufacturer and supplier of automotive emissions testing equipment and software control systems and a provider of comprehensive inspection station management services.~~com~~ Such services include the establishment of systems, standards and equipment supply, create inspection service market rules and formulate market rules with the government together in order to constitute a complete set of industry management methods and management measures, which include staff training, equipment access, inspection technology standards, management content and specific requirements.

~~REPORT~~2. SUMMARY OF ~~INDEPENDENT~~SIGNIFICANT ~~REGISTERED PUBLIC~~ ACCOUNTING ~~FIRM~~POLICIES

To(a) ~~the~~Method ~~Board~~ of ~~Directors~~accounting

~~Eco~~The ~~Energy~~Group ~~Pumps~~maintains ~~Inc~~its general ledger and journals with the accrual method of accounting for financial reporting purposes. The financial statements and notes are representations of management. Accounting policies adopted by the Group conform to generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) and have been consistently applied in the presentation of financial statements.

~~(A Development Stage Company)~~7

WeECO ~~have~~ENERGY ~~audited the accompanying balance sheets of Eco Energy Pumps Inc. (A Development Stage Company) as of October 31~~PUMPS, 2009 and October 31, 2008, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 and since inception on October 14, 2008 through October 31, 2009INC. ~~These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.~~

WeNOTES ~~conduct~~TO ~~our~~CONSOLIDATED ~~audits~~FINANCIAL in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.STATEMENTS

InFOR ~~our~~THE ~~opinion,~~PERIOD ~~the~~FROM ~~financial~~JUNE ~~statements referred to above present fairly~~3, in2010 ~~all material respects, the financial position of Eco Energy Pumps Inc.~~ (~~A Development Stage Company~~INCEPTION) asTO ofOCTOBER ~~October~~ 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008, and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years ended October 31, 2009 and October 31, 2008 and since inception on October 14, 2008 through October 31, 2009, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.2010

~~The~~ (Stated ~~accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed~~ in ~~Note~~US 3 to the financial statements, the Company has had a loss from operations of $20,751 an accumulated deficit of $22,046, working capital deficit of $7,696 and has earned no revenues since inception, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 3. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.Dollars)

~~/s/~~(b) ~~Seale~~Principles ~~and~~of ~~Beers, CPAs~~consolidation

~~Seale~~The consolidated financial statements are presented in US Dollars and ~~Beers,~~include ~~CPAs~~the accounts of the Company and its subsidiary. All significant inter-company balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

~~Las~~The ~~Vegas~~Company owned its subsidiary soon after its inception and continued to own the equity’s interests through October 31, ~~Nevada~~2010. The following table depicts the identity of the subsidiary:

April 9, 2010

Name of Subsidiary	Place & Date of Incorporation	Equity Interest Attributable to the Company (%)	Common Stock/ Registered Capital ($)	Registered Capital (RMB)

DLT International Limited	BVI/March 18, 2010	100	$50,000	N/A

Dalei Vehicle Inspecting Technology (Shen Zhen) Co., Ltd (“Dalei”)	PRC/June 3, 2010	100	$730,855	RMB 5,000,000

~~50 S. Jones Blvd. Suite 202 Las Vegas, NV 89107 Phone:~~ (~~888~~c)~~727-8251~~ ~~Fax:~~Use ~~(888)782-2351~~of estimates

~~ECO~~The ~~ENERGY~~preparation ~~PUMPS,~~of ~~INC~~the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Management makes these estimates using the best information available at the time the estimates are made; however actual results could differ materially from those estimates.

(Ad) ~~Development~~Economic ~~Stage~~and ~~Company)~~political risks

~~FINANCIAL~~The ~~STATEMENTS~~Group’s operations are conducted in the PRC. Accordingly, the Group’s business, financial condition and results of operations may be influenced by the political, economic and legal environment in the PRC, and by the general state of the PRC economy.

~~OCTOBER~~The 31Group’s operations in the PRC are subject to special considerations and significant risks not typically associated with companies in North America and Western Europe. These include risks associated with, ~~2009~~among others, the political, economic and legal environment and foreign currency exchange. The Group’s results may be adversely affected by changes in the political and social conditions in the PRC, and by changes in governmental policies with respect to laws and regulations, anti-inflationary measures, currency conversion, remittances abroad, and rates and methods of taxation, among other things.

~~BALANCE~~(e) ~~SHEET~~Property, plant and equipment

~~STATEMENT~~Plant OFand ~~OPERATION~~equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided over their estimated useful lives, using the straight-line method. Estimated useful lives of the plant and equipment are as follows:

STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Buildings	40 years	Machinery & equipment	8 years
Office equipment	5 years

~~STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS~~8

~~NOTES~~ECO TOENERGY ~~FINANCIAL~~PUMPS, ~~STATEMENTS~~INC.

~~ECO~~NOTES ~~ENERGY~~TO ~~PUMPS,~~CONSOLIDATED ~~INC.~~FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(AFOR ~~Development~~THE ~~Stage~~PERIOD ~~Company~~FROM JUNE 3, 2010 (INCEPTION) TO OCTOBER 31, 2010

~~BALANCE~~ (Stated ~~SHEET~~in US Dollars)

		October 31, 2009 (Audited)
ASSETS
Trust Account	2,799
CURRENT ASSETS	2,799
TOTAL ASSETS	$ 2,799
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accrued Expenses	9,400
Loans from Related Party	1,995
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES	$ 11,395
STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY (DEFICIT )
Capital stock (Note 4)
Authorized
75,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value,
Issued and outstanding
9,552,500 (9,300,000 in Oct 31, 2008) shares of common stock	9,552
Additional Paid in Capital	4,798
Subscription Receivable	-
Accumulated Deficit during development stage	(22,946)
TOTAL STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY/(DEFICIT)	$ (8,596)
TOTAL LIABILITES AND STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY/(DEFICIT)	$ 2,799

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

The ~~accompanying~~cost ~~notes~~and related accumulated depreciation of assets sold or otherwise retired are aneliminated ~~integral~~from ~~part~~the ofaccounts ~~these~~and ~~financial~~any ~~statements~~gain or loss is included in the statement of income.

~~ECO~~(f) ~~ENERGY~~Accounting ~~PUMPS,~~for ~~INC.~~the impairment of long-lived assets

(AThe ~~Development~~Group ~~Stage~~periodically ~~Company)~~evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used, including intangible assets subject to amortization, when events and circumstances warrant such a review, pursuant to the guidelines established in ASC No. 360, “Property, Plant and Equipment”. The carrying value of a long-lived asset is considered impaired when the anticipated undiscounted cash flow from such asset is separately identifiable and is less than its carrying value. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair market value of the long-lived asset. Fair market value is determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved. Losses on long-lived assets to be disposed of are determined in a similar manner, except that fair market values are reduced for the cost to dispose.

~~STATEMENT~~During OFthe ~~OPERATIONS~~reporting periods, there was no impairment loss.

~~Audited~~(g) Foreign currency translation

	Twelve months to October 31, 2009	Cumulative results of operations from October 14, 2008 (date of inception) to October 31, 2009
REVENUE	$ -	$ -
OPERATING EXPENSES
General and Administration	$ (21,651)	$ (22,946)
NET LOSS	$ (21,651)	$ (22,946)
Provision for income taxes	$ -	$ -
NET LOSS, after taxes	$ (21,651)	$ (22,946)
BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER COMMON SHARE	$ 0.00	$ 0.00
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF BASIC AND DILUTED COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING	9,388,697

The accompanying financial statements are presented in United States dollars. The functional currency of the Group is the Renminbi (RMB). The financial statements are translated into United States dollars from RMB at year-end exchange rates as to assets and liabilities and average exchange rates as to revenues and expenses. Capital accounts are translated at their historical exchange rates when the capital transactions occurred.

The ~~accompanying~~exchange ~~notes~~rates ~~are~~used anto ~~integral~~translate ~~part~~amounts in RMB into USD for the purposes of ~~these~~preparing the consolidated financial statements were as follows:

ECO ENERGY PUMPS, INC.

October 31, 2010
Consolidated balance sheet	RMB 6.671114 to US$1.00
Consolidated statements of income and comprehensive income	RMB 6.749005 to US$1.00

(AThe ~~Development~~RMB ~~Stage~~is ~~Company)~~not freely convertible into foreign currency and all foreign exchange transactions must take place through authorized institutions. No representation is made that the RMB amounts could have been, or could be, converted into USD at the rates used in translation. In addition, the current foreign exchange control policies applicable in PRC also restrict the transfer of assets or dividends outside the PRC.

~~STATEMENT~~(h) OFCash ~~STOCKHOLDERS’~~and ~~EQUITY~~cash ~~(DEFICIT)~~equivalents

~~FROM~~The ~~INCEPTION~~Group ~~(October~~considers ~~14,~~all ~~2008)~~highly TOliquid ~~October~~investments ~~31,~~purchased ~~2009~~with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Group maintains bank accounts in the PRC. The Group does not maintain any bank accounts in the United States of America. The cash located outside the United States is not restricted as to usage.

	Common Stock		Additional Paid-in Capital	Share Subscription Receivable	Deficit Accumulated During the Development Stage	Total
	Number of shares	Amount
Common stock issued for cash at $0.001 per share
- November 6, 2008	9,300,000	$ 9,300	$ -	$ (4,300)	$ -	$ 5,000
Common stock issued at $0.02 per share.
- June 29, 2009	252,500	252	4,798			5,050
Subscription Received				4,300		4,300
Net Loss for the period ended October 31, 2009	-	-	-	-	(22,946)	(22,946)
Balance, October 31, 2009 (Audited)	9,552,500	9,552	4,798	-	(22,946)	(8,596)

~~The~~ ECO ~~accompanying~~ENERGY ~~notes~~PUMPS, ~~are an integral part of these financial statements~~INC.

~~ECO~~NOTES ~~ENERGY~~TO ~~PUMPS,~~CONSOLIDATED ~~INC.~~FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(AFOR ~~Development~~THE ~~Stage~~PERIOD ~~Company~~FROM JUNE 3, 2010 (INCEPTION) TO OCTOBER 31, 2010

~~STATEMENT~~ (Stated OFin ~~CASH~~US ~~FLOWS~~Dollars)

~~Audited~~2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

	Twelve Months to October 31, 2009	October 14, 2008 (date of inception) to October 31, 2009
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$ (21,651)	$ (22,946)
Expense paid by Shareholder	-	1,295
Accrued Expenses	9,400	9,400
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING ACTIVITIES	(12,251)	(12,251)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Common Shares	14,350	14,350
Loans from related party	700	700
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES	15,050	15,050
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH	2,799	2,799
CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD	-	-
CASH, END OF PERIOD	$ 2,799	$ 2,799

(i)

Accounts receivable

~~Supplemental~~Accounts ~~Non~~receivable is recognized and carried at the original invoice amount less allowance for any uncollectible amounts. An allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained for all customers based on a variety of factors, including the length of time the receivables are past due, significant one-~~Cash~~time ~~Disclosures:~~events and historical experience. Bad debts are written off as incurred. During the reporting years, there were no bad debts.

~~Expense~~Outstanding ~~Paid~~accounts bybalances ~~Shareholder~~are $reviewed -individually $for 1collectability. The Company do not charge any interest income on trade receivables. Accounts balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. To date,~~295~~ the Company has not charged off any balances as it has yet to exhaust all means of collection.

~~Income~~(j) ~~taxes~~Revenue ~~$ - $ -~~recognition

~~The~~Revenue ~~accompanying~~represents ~~notes~~the ~~are~~invoiced anvalue ~~integral~~of ~~part~~goods sold recognized upon the delivery of ~~these~~goods ~~financial~~to ~~statements~~customers. Revenue is recognized when all of the following criteria are met:

~~ECO~~- ~~ENERGY~~Persuasive ~~PUMPS,~~evidence ~~INC.~~of an arrangement exists;

(A- ~~Development~~Delivery ~~Stage~~has ~~Company)~~occurred or services have been rendered;

~~NOTES~~- TOThe ~~THE~~seller’s ~~FINANCIAL~~price ~~STATEMENTS~~to the buyer is fixed or determinable; and

~~October~~- ~~31,~~Collection ~~2009~~is reasonably assured.

~~NOTE~~(k) ~~1 – NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION~~Leases

~~ECO ENERGY PUMPS, INC. (“Company”) is in the initial development stage and has incurred losses since inception totalling $22,946.~~ The ~~Company~~Group ~~was~~did ~~incorporated~~not onhave ~~October~~a ~~14,~~lease ~~2008~~that inmet the ~~State~~criteria of ~~Nevada and established~~ a ~~fiscal~~capital ~~year~~lease. ~~end~~Leases ofthat ~~October~~do ~~31. The~~not ~~Company~~qualify isas a ~~development~~capital ~~stage~~lease ~~company~~are ~~organized~~classified toas ~~develop~~an aoperating ~~very~~lease. ~~efficient~~Operating ~~water~~lease ~~pump~~rental ~~powered~~payments byincluded ~~solar~~in ~~energy.~~general ~~Its~~and ~~main~~administrative ~~differential~~expenses ~~will~~for be the ~~exclusive~~period ~~rotary~~ended ~~style~~June ~~positive flow pump~~30, ~~which~~2010 ~~will~~was ~~be able to pump water continually with no waste of energy~~$13,736.

~~NOTE~~(l) ~~2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES~~Advertising

~~Basis~~The ofGroup ~~Presentation~~expensed all advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expenses included in the general and administrative expense for the period ended June 30, 2010 was nil.

~~The financial statements present the balance sheet, statements of operations, stockholders' equity~~ (~~deficit~~m) ~~and~~Income ~~cash flows of the Company. These financial statements are presented in United States dollars and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.~~ taxes

~~Use~~The Group accounts for income taxes using an asset and liability approach and allows for recognition of ~~Estimates~~deferred tax benefits in future years. Under the asset and ~~Assumptions~~liability approach, deferred taxes are provided for the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. A valuation allowance is provided for deferred tax assets if it is more likely than not these items will either expire before the Group is able to realize their benefits, or that future realization is uncertain.

~~Preparation~~The ofGroup ~~the~~is ~~financial~~operating ~~statements~~ in ~~conformity~~the ~~with~~PRC, ~~accounting~~and ~~principles~~in ~~generally~~accordance ~~accepted~~with in the ~~United~~relevant ~~States~~tax ~~requires~~laws ~~management~~and toregulations ~~make~~of ~~estimates~~PRC, ~~and~~the ~~assumptions~~enterprise ~~that~~income ~~affect~~tax ~~certain~~rate ~~reported~~for ~~amounts~~the ~~and~~period ~~disclosures. Accordingly,~~ended ~~actual~~June ~~results~~30, ~~could~~2010 ~~differ~~was ~~from those estimates~~25%.

~~Income Taxes~~10

~~Deferred~~ECO ~~tax~~ENERGY assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assetsPUMPS, including tax loss and credit carry forwards, and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settledINC. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred income tax expense represents the change during the period in the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities. The components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities are individually classified as current and non-current based on their characteristics. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.

~~Net~~NOTES ~~Loss~~TO ~~per~~CONSOLIDATED ~~Share~~FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~Basic~~FOR ~~loss~~THE ~~per~~PERIOD ~~share~~FROM ~~includes~~JUNE no3, ~~dilution~~2010 ~~and~~(INCEPTION) isTO ~~computed~~OCTOBER by dividing loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Dilutive loss per share reflects the potential dilution of securities that could share in the losses of the Company. Because the Company does not have any potentially dilutive securities31, ~~the accompanying presentation is only of basic loss per share.~~2010

~~ECO~~ (Stated ~~ENERGY~~in ~~PUMPS,~~US ~~INC.~~Dollars)

(A2. SUMMARY ~~Development~~OF ~~Stage~~SIGNIFICANT ~~Company~~ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

~~NOTES~~(n) TOCash ~~THE~~and ~~FINANCIAL~~concentration ~~STATEMENTS~~of risk

Cash includes cash on hand and demand deposits in accounts maintained within the PRC. No bank deposit was maintained at October 31, ~~2009~~2010. The Group has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not exposed to any risk on its cash in bank accounts.

~~NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES~~ (~~continued~~o) Comprehensive income

~~Foreign~~Comprehensive ~~Currency~~income ~~Translation~~is defined to include all changes in equity except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. Among other disclosures, all items that are required to be recognized under current accounting standards as components of comprehensive income are required to be reported in a financial statement that is presented with the same prominence as other financial statements. The Group’s current component of other comprehensive income is the foreign currency translation adjustment.

The financial statements are presented in United States dollars. "Foreign Currency Translation", foreign denominated monetary assets and liabilities are translated to their United States dollar equivalents using foreign exchange rates which prevailed at the balance sheet date. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated at exchange rates prevailing at the transaction date. Revenue and expenses are translated at average rates of exchange during the periods presented. Related translation adjustments are reported as a separate component of stockholders’ equity (~~deficit~~p), ~~whereas~~Recently ~~gains~~implemented ~~or losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in results of operations~~standards

~~Revenue~~These ~~and~~Accounting ~~Cost~~Standards ~~Recognition~~Updates should be applied on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010, with earlier application permitted. Alternatively, an entity can elect to adopt these standards on a retrospective basis, but both these standards must be adopted in the same period using the same transition method. The Company expects to apply this standard on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified beginning January 1, 2011. It is expected the adoption of this Statement will have no material effect on the Company’s Financial Statements.

~~The~~ASC ~~Company~~Update ~~has~~(“ASU”) noNo. ~~current~~2010-01, ~~source~~Equity (Topic 505): Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of ~~revenue;~~Stock ~~therefore~~and Cash. This update clarifies that the ~~Company~~stock ~~has~~portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in earnings per share prospectively and is not ~~yet~~a ~~adopted~~stock ~~any~~dividend. ~~policy~~This ~~regarding~~ASU codified the ~~recognition~~consensus reached in EITF Issue No. 09-E “Accounting for Stock Dividends, Including Distributions to Shareholders with Components of ~~revenue~~Stock and Cash”. ASU 2010-01 is effective for interim and annual periods ending on or ~~cost~~after December 15, 2009, and should be applied on a retrospective basis. The adoption of this update did not have any material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

~~Stock~~ASC Updated (“ASU”) No. 2010-~~based~~02, ~~Compensation~~Consolidation (Topics 810) – Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary - A Scope Clarification. This update provides guidance for non-controlling interests and changes in ownership interests of a subsidiary. An entity is required to deconsolidate a subsidiary when the entity ceases to have a controlling financial interest in the subsidiary. Upon deconsolidation of a subsidiary, an entity recognizes a gain or loss on the transaction and measures any retained investment in the subsidiary at fair value. The gain or loss includes any gain or loss associated with the difference between the fair value of the retained investment in the subsidiary and its carrying amount at the date the subsidiary is deconsolidated. In contrast, an entity is required to account for a decrease in its ownership interest of a subsidiary that does not result in a change of control of the subsidiary as an equity transaction. The adoption of this update did not have any material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

~~The Company has not adopted a stock option plan and has not granted any stock options. Accordingly no stock-based compensation has been recorded to date.~~11

~~Advertising~~ECO ENERGY PUMPS, INC.

~~The~~NOTES ~~company~~TO ~~expenses~~CONSOLIDATED ~~advertising~~FINANCIAL ~~as incurred. The company has had no advertising since inception.~~STATEMENTS

~~Recent~~FOR ~~Accounting~~THE ~~Pronouncements~~PERIOD FROM JUNE 3, 2010 (INCEPTION) TO OCTOBER 31, 2010

~~In February 2010, the FASB~~ (~~Financial~~Stated Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-08 (ASU 2010-08), Technical Corrections to Various Topics. This amendment eliminated inconsistencies and outdated provisions and provided the needed clarifications to various topics within Topic 815. The amendments are effective for the first reporting period (including interim periods) beginning after issuance (February 2, 2010), except for certain amendments. The amendments to the guidance on accounting for income taxes in aUS ~~reorganization (Subtopic 852-740~~Dollars) should be applied to reorganizations for which the date of the reorganization is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. For those reorganizations reflected in interim financial statements issued before the amendments in this Update are effective, retrospective application is required. The clarifications of the guidance on the embedded derivates and hedging (Subtopic 815-15) are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2009, and should be applied to existing contracts (hybrid instruments) containing embedded derivative features at the date of adoption. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-08 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

~~ECO~~2. SUMMARY ~~ENERGY~~OF ~~PUMPS,~~SIGNIFICANT ~~INC.~~ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

(Ap) Recently ~~Development~~implemented ~~Stage~~standards ~~Company~~(Continued)

~~NOTES~~ASC TOUpdate ~~THE~~(“ASU”) ~~FINANCIAL~~No. ~~STATEMENTS~~2010-13, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades. This update is to codify the consensus reached in EITF Issue No. 09-J, “Effect of Denominating the Exercise Price of a Share-Based Payment Award in the Currency of the Market in Which the Underlying Equity Security Trades.” The amendments to the Codification clarify that an employee share-based payment award with an exercise price denominated in the currency of a market in which a substantial portion of the entity’s equity shares trades should not be considered to contain a condition that is not a market, performance, or services condition. Therefore, an entity would not classify such an award as a liability if it otherwise qualifies as equity. The adoption of this update did not have any material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

~~October~~ASC 31Update (“ASU”) No. 2010-21, ~~2009~~Accounting for Technical Amendments to Various SEC Rules and Schedules. This update amends various SEC paragraphs in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification pursuant to SEC Final Rule, “Technical Amendments to Rules Forms, Schedules and Codification of Financial Reporting Policies”. The adoption of this update did not have any material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

~~NOTE~~ASC 2Update –(“ASU”) ~~SUMMARY~~No. OF2010-22, ~~SIGNIFICANT~~Accounting ~~ACCOUNTING~~for ~~POLICIES~~Various Topics. This update amends various SEC paragraphs in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification based on external comments received and the issuance of Staff Accounting Bulletin (~~continued~~SAB) No. 112 which amends or rescinds portion of certain SAB topics. SAB 112 was issued to bring existing SEC guidance into conformity with ASC 805 “Business Combination” and ASC 810 “Consolidation”. The adoption of this update did not have any material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

InOther ~~January~~accounting ~~2010,~~standards ~~the~~that ~~FASB~~have ~~(Financial~~been ~~Accounting Standards Board)~~ issued ~~Accounting~~or ~~Standards~~proposed ~~Update~~by ~~2010-07~~the ~~(ASU~~FASB ~~2010-07),~~or ~~Not-for-Profit~~other ~~Entities (Topic 958): Not~~standards-~~for-Profit~~setting ~~Entities:~~bodies ~~Mergers~~that ~~and~~do ~~Acquisitions. This~~not ~~amendment~~require toadoption ~~Topic~~until ~~958 has occurred as~~ a ~~result~~future ofdate ~~the~~are ~~issuance of FAS 164. The Company does~~ not ~~expect~~expected ~~the provisions of ASU 2010-07~~ to have a material ~~effect~~impact on the Company’s financial ~~position,~~statements ~~results~~upon ~~of operations or cash flows of the Company~~adoption.

In January 2010, the FASB (Financial Accounting Standards Board) issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-06 (ASU 2010-06), Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. This amendment to Topic 820 has improved disclosures about fair value measurements on the basis of input received from the users of financial statements. This is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 ~~fair value measurements~~. ~~Those~~ CONCENTRATIONS ~~disclosures~~OF ~~are~~CREDIT ~~effective~~RISK ~~for~~AND ~~fiscal~~MAJOR years beginning after December 15, 2010, and for interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-06 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.CUSTOMERS

InFinancial ~~January~~instruments ~~2010,~~that potentially expose the ~~FASB~~Group ~~(Financial~~to ~~Accounting~~concentrations ~~Standards~~of ~~Board)~~credit ~~issued~~risk, ~~Accounting~~consists ~~Standards~~of ~~Update~~cash ~~2010-05~~and ~~(ASU~~accounts ~~2010-05)~~receivable as of October 31, ~~Compensation~~2010. –The ~~Stock~~Group ~~Compensation~~performs ~~(Topic~~ongoing ~~718). This~~evaluations ~~standard~~of ~~codifies~~its ~~EITF~~cash ~~Topic~~position ~~D-110~~and ~~Escrowed~~credit ~~Share~~evaluations ~~Arrangements~~to ensure sound collections and ~~the~~minimize ~~Presumption~~credit oflosses ~~Compensation~~exposure.

InAs ~~January~~of October 31, 2010, all the ~~FASB~~Group’s ~~(Financial~~bank ~~Accounting~~deposits ~~Standards~~were ~~Board)~~conducted ~~issued~~with ~~Accounting~~banks ~~Standards~~in ~~Update~~the ~~2010-04~~PRC ~~(ASU~~where ~~2010-04),~~there ~~Accounting~~is ~~for~~currently ~~Various~~no ~~Topics—Technical~~rule ~~Corrections~~or toregulation ~~SEC~~mandated ~~Paragraphs~~on obligatory insurance of bank accounts.

InFor ~~January 2010,~~ the ~~FASB~~period ~~(Financial~~ended ~~Accounting~~October ~~Standards~~31, ~~Board) issued Accounting Standards Update~~ 2010~~-03 (ASU 2010-03)~~, ~~Extractive~~all ~~Activities—Oil~~of ~~and~~the ~~Gas~~Group’s ~~(Topic~~sales ~~932):~~were ~~Oil~~generated ~~and~~from ~~Gas~~the ~~Reserve Estimation and Disclosures~~PRC. ~~This~~ ~~amendment~~In toaddition, ~~Topic~~all ~~932~~accounts ~~has~~receivable ~~improved~~as ~~the~~of ~~reserve~~October ~~estimation~~31, ~~and~~2010 ~~disclosure~~also ~~requirements~~arose ~~by (1) updating the reserve estimation requirements for changes~~ in ~~practice and technology that have occurred over~~ the ~~last several decades and (2) expanding the disclosure requirements for equity method investments~~PRC. ~~This is effective for annual reporting periods ending on or after December 31,~~

~~2009. However,~~The anmaximum ~~entity~~amount ~~that becomes subject to the disclosures because~~ of ~~the~~loss ~~change~~exposure todue ~~the definition oil- and gas- producing activities may elect~~ to ~~provide~~credit ~~those~~risk ~~disclosures~~that inthe ~~annual~~Group ~~periods~~would ~~beginning~~bear ~~after~~if ~~December~~the ~~31,~~counter ~~2009. Early~~parties ~~adoption~~of ~~is not permitted. The Company does not expect~~ the ~~provisions~~financial ofinstruments ~~ASU~~failed ~~2010-03~~ to ~~have~~perform arepresents ~~material effect on~~ the ~~financial~~carrying ~~position,~~amount ~~results~~ of ~~operations~~each orfinancial ~~cash~~asset ~~flows~~on of the ~~Company~~balance sheet.

~~ECO~~Normally, ~~ENERGY~~the ~~PUMPS,~~Group ~~INC~~does not require collateral from customers or debtors.

~~(A Development Stage Company)~~12

~~NOTES~~ECO TOENERGY ~~THE~~PUMPS, ~~FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~INC.

~~October~~NOTES ~~31,~~TO ~~2009~~CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~NOTE~~FOR 2THE –PERIOD ~~SUMMARY~~FROM OFJUNE ~~SIGNIFICANT~~3, ~~ACCOUNTING~~2010 ~~POLICIES~~ (~~continued~~INCEPTION) TO OCTOBER 31, 2010

~~In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-02, Consolidation~~ (~~Topic~~Stated ~~810): Accounting and Reporting for Decreases~~ in ~~Ownership of a Subsidiary. This amendment to Topic 810 clarifies, but does not change, the scope of current~~ US GAAP. It clarifies the decrease in ownership provisions of Subtopic 810-10 and removes the potential conflict between guidance in that Subtopic and asset derecognition and gain or loss recognition guidance that may exist in other US GAAP. An entity will be required to follow the amended guidance beginning in the period that it first adopts FAS 160 (now included in Subtopic 810-10Dollars). For those entities that have already adopted FAS 160, the amendments are effective at the beginning of the first interim or annual reporting period ending on or after December 15, 2009. The amendments should be applied retrospectively to the first period that an entity adopted FAS 160. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-02 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

In3. CONCENTRATIONS ~~January~~OF ~~2010,~~CREDIT ~~the~~RISK ~~FASB~~AND ~~issued~~MAJOR ~~Accounting~~CUSTOMERS ~~Standards Update 2010-01, Equity~~ (~~Topic 505~~Continued): Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash (A Consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). This amendment to Topic 505 clarifies the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a limit on the amount of cash that will be distributed is not a stock dividend for purposes of applying Topics 505 and 260. Effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009, and would be applied on a retrospective basis. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2010-01 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

InFor ~~December 2009,~~ the ~~FASB~~period ~~issued~~ended ~~Accounting~~October ~~Standards~~31, ~~Update 2009-17~~2010, ~~Consolidations (Topic 810): Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities. This Accounting Standards Update amends~~ the ~~FASB~~following ~~Accounting~~customers ~~Standards~~accounted ~~Codification~~ for ~~Statement~~10% ~~167.~~or ~~(See~~more ~~FAS~~of ~~167~~the ~~effective~~Group’s ~~date below)~~revenue.

In December 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-16, Transfers and Servicing (Topic 860): Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets. This Accounting Standards Update amends the FASB Accounting Standards Codification for Statement 166. (See FAS 166 effective date below)

	For the period ended
	October 31, 2010

Customer A		$1,873,750
Customer B		619,087

InAt October ~~2009~~31, 2010, the ~~FASB~~following ~~issued~~customers ~~Accounting~~accounted ~~Standards Update 2009-15, Accounting~~ for ~~Own-Share~~10% ~~Lending~~or ~~Arrangements~~more ~~in Contemplation~~ of ~~Convertible Debt Issuance or Other Financing. This Accounting Standards Update amends~~ the ~~FASB~~Group’s ~~Accounting~~accounts ~~Standard Codification for EITF 09-1. (See EITF 09-1 effective date below)~~ receivable:

In October 2009, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-14, Software (Topic 985): Certain Revenue Arrangements That Include Software Elements. This update changed the accounting model for revenue arrangements that include both tangible products and software elements. Effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the provisions

	October 31, 2010

Customer A		$374,750
Customer B		314,790
Customer C		292,305

~~ECO~~4. PROPERTY, ~~ENERGY~~PLANT ~~PUMPS~~AND EQUIPMENT, ~~INC.~~NET

(ADetails ~~Development~~of ~~Stage~~property, ~~Company)~~plant and equipment are as follows:

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

	2010
At cost
Buildings	$	693,491
Machinery & equipment		747,326
Office equipment		1,949
Less: accumulated depreciation		(35,308	)

	$	1,407,458

Depreciation expense included in the general and administrative expenses for the period ended October 31, ~~2009~~2010 was $35,308.

~~NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)~~13

ofECO ~~ASU~~ENERGY ~~2009-14 to have a material effect on the financial position~~PUMPS, ~~results of operations or cash flows of the Company~~INC.

InNOTES ~~October~~TO ~~2009,~~CONSOLIDATED ~~the~~FINANCIAL FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605): Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements. This update addressed the accounting for multiple-deliverable arrangements to enable vendors to account for products or services (deliverables) separately rather than a combined unit and will be separated in more circumstances that under existing US GAAP. This amendment has eliminated that residual method of allocation. Effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2009-13 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.STATEMENTS

InFOR ~~September~~THE ~~2009,~~PERIOD ~~the~~FROM ~~FASB~~JUNE ~~issued Accounting Standards Update 2009-12~~3, ~~Fair~~2010 ~~Value Measurements and Disclosures~~ (~~Topic 820~~INCEPTION): ~~Investments~~TO inOCTOBER Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent). This update provides amendments to Topic 820 for the fair value measurement of investments in certain entities that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent). It is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 1531, 2009. Early application is permitted in financial statements for earlier interim and annual periods that have not been issued. The Company does not expect the provisions of ASU 2009-12 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.2010

~~In July 2009, the FASB ratified the consensus reached by EITF~~ (~~Emerging~~Stated ~~Issues Task Force) issued EITF No. 09-1, (ASC Topic 470) “Accounting for Own-Share Lending Arrangements~~ in ~~Contemplation~~US ~~of Convertible Debt Issuance” (“EITF 09-1”~~Dollars). The provisions of EITF 09-1, clarifies the accounting treatment and disclosure of share-lending arrangements that are classified as equity in the financial statements of the share lender. An example of a share-lending arrangement is an agreement between the Company (share lender) and an investment bank (share borrower) which allows the investment bank to use the loaned shares to enter into equity derivative contracts with investors. EITF 09-1 is effective for fiscal years that beginning on or after December 15, 2009 and requires retrospective application for all arrangements outstanding as of the beginning of fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2009. Share-lending arrangements that have been terminated as a result of counterparty default prior to December 15, 2009, but for which the entity has not reached a final settlement as of December 15, 2009 are within the scope. Effective for share-lending arrangements entered into on or after the beginning of the first reporting period that begins on or after June 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the provisions of EITF 09-1 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

~~ECO~~5. RELATED ~~ENERGY~~PARTY ~~PUMPS, INC.~~TRANSACTIONS

(AIn ~~Development~~the ~~Stage~~normal ~~Company)~~course of its business, the Group carried out the following related party transactions during the period ended October 31, 2010.

~~NOTES~~(a) TORelated ~~THE~~party ~~FINANCIAL~~receivables ~~STATEMENTS~~and payables

Amounts receivable from and payable to related parties as of October 31, ~~2009~~2010 are summarized as follows:

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

		October 31,
	Common shareholder	2010

Amount due from a related party:
Shenzhen Dalei Transportation Technology
Co., Ltd	Mr. Zhang Xiuliang	$	212,671


Amounts due to related companies:
Shenzhen Dalei Software Technology Co., Ltd	Mr. Zhang Xiuliang	$	18,647
Hefei Dalei Technology Co., Ltd	Mr. Zhang Xiuliang		6,722

		$	25,369

InBalances ~~June~~with ~~2009,~~related ~~the~~parties ~~FASB~~represent ~~issued~~advances SFAS No. 168 (ASC Topic 105), “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162” (“SFAS No. 168”). Under SFAS No. 168 the “FASB Accounting Standards Codification” (“Codification”) will become the source of authoritative US GAAP to beor ~~applied~~loans byfrom ~~nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of~~ the ~~Securities~~respective ~~and~~related ~~Exchange Commission (“SEC”) under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants~~party. ~~SFAS~~These ~~No.~~balances ~~168~~were isinterest ~~effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15~~free, ~~2009. On~~unsecured ~~the effective date, the Codification will supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting~~ and ~~reporting~~repayable ~~standards.~~on ~~All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative~~demand. ~~SFAS~~It ~~No.~~was ~~168~~expected isthat ~~effective for~~ the ~~Company’s~~balances ~~interim~~would ~~quarterly~~be ~~period~~received ~~beginning~~or ~~July~~repaid 1,within ~~2009.~~one ~~The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No~~year. ~~168 to have an impact on the financial statements.~~

~~In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 167~~ (~~ASC Topic 810~~b), ~~“Amendments~~Payable to ~~FASB~~key Interpretation No. 46(R) (“SFAS 167”). SFAS 167 amends the consolidation guidance applicable to variable interest entities. The provisions of SFAS 167 significantly affect the overall consolidation analysis under FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). SFAS 167 is effective as of the beginning of the first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009. SFAS 167 will be effective for the Company beginning in 2010. The Company does not expect the provisions of SFAS 167 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.management

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 166, (ASC Topic 860) “Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140” (“SFAS 166”). The provisions of SFAS 166, in part, amend the derecognition guidance in FASB Statement No. 140, eliminate the exemption from consolidation for qualifying special-purpose entities and require additional disclosures. SFAS 166 is effective for financial asset transfers occurring after the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2009. The Company does not expect the provisions of SFAS 166 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.

	October 31,
	2010

Amounts due to the key management:
Liu Jun	$	23,984
Li Zhengying		10,493

	$	34,477

InAmounts ~~April~~due ~~2009,~~to the ~~FASB~~key ~~issued~~management ~~SFAS~~are ~~No. 164~~unsecured, ~~(ASC Topic 810) “Not~~interest-for-Profit Entities: Mergers and Acquisitions – including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 142” (“SFAS 164”). The provisions of SFAS 164 provide guidance on accounting for a combination of not-for-profit entities either via merger or acquisition. SFAS 164 is effective for mergers occurring on or after the beginning of an initial reporting period beginning on or after December 15free, ~~2009~~ and ~~acquisitions~~repayable ~~occurring~~ on ~~or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2009~~demand. ~~The Company does not expect the provisions of SFAS 164 to have a material effect on the financial position, results of operations or cash flows of the Company.~~

~~ECO ENERGY PUMPS, INC.~~14

(A ECO ~~Development~~ENERGY ~~Stage~~PUMPS, ~~Company)~~INC.

NOTES TO ~~THE~~CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~October~~FOR THE PERIOD FROM JUNE 3, 2010 (INCEPTION) TO OCTOBER 31, ~~2009~~2010

~~NOTE~~ (Stated 2in –US ~~SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued~~Dollars)

~~In June 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Office of the Chief Accountant and Division of Corporation Finance announced the release of Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No~~6. FAIR ~~112.~~VALUE ~~This~~OF ~~staff~~FINANCIAL accounting bulletin amends or rescinds portions of the interpretive guidance included in the Staff Accounting Bulletin Series in order to make the relevant interpretive guidance consistent with current authoritative accounting and auditing guidance and Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations. Specifically, the staff is updating the Series in order to bring existing guidance into conformity with recent pronouncements by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, namely, Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 (revised 2007) (ASC Topic 805), Business Combinations, and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160 (ASC Topic 810), Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. The statements in staff accounting bulletins are not rules or interpretations of the Commission, nor are they published as bearing the Commission's official approval. They represent interpretations and practices followed by the Division of Corporation Finance and the Office of the Chief Accountant in administering the disclosure requirements of the Federal securities laws.INSTRUMENTS

InThe ~~September~~fair ~~2008,~~value ~~the~~of ~~FASB~~a ~~issued~~financial ~~exposure~~instrument ~~drafts~~is ~~that~~the ~~eliminate~~amount ~~qualifying~~at ~~special~~which ~~purpose entities from~~ the ~~guidance~~instrument ofcould ~~SFAS~~be ~~No.~~exchanged ~~140~~in ~~(ASC~~a ~~Topic~~current ~~860),~~transaction ~~“Accounting~~between ~~for~~willing ~~Transfers~~parties. The ~~and~~carrying ~~Servicing~~amounts of ~~Financial Assets~~financial assets and ~~Extinguishments~~ ~~of Liabilities~~liabilities,” ~~and FASB Interpretation~~such 46as ~~(ASC~~cash ~~Topic~~and ~~810)~~cash ~~(revised~~equivalents, ~~December~~trade ~~2003)~~receivables, ~~“Consolidation~~amount ~~of Variable Interest~~due ~~Entities −~~from ana ~~interpretation of ARB No. 51 (ASC Topic 810)~~director,” ~~as well as~~ other ~~modifications. While~~receivables, ~~the~~amount ~~proposed~~due ~~revised~~to ~~pronouncements~~a ~~have~~shareholder ~~not been finalized~~ and ~~the~~other ~~proposals are subject to further public comment~~payables, ~~the~~approximate ~~Company~~their ~~anticipates~~fair ~~the~~values ~~changes~~because ~~will~~of ~~not have a significant impact on~~ the ~~Company’s~~short ~~financial~~maturity ~~statements. The~~of ~~changes~~these ~~would~~instruments beand ~~effective~~market ~~March~~rates 1,of ~~2010, on a prospective basis~~interest.

~~NOTE~~7. INCOME ~~3 – GOING CONCERN~~TAXES

The Company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern. This contemplates the realization of assets and the liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. Currently, the Company does has cash in trust but no material assets, the Company has had a loss from operations of $21,651 an accumulated deficit of $22,946, working capital deficit of $8,596 and has earned no revenues since inception nor does it have operations or a source of revenue sufficient to cover its operation costs giving substantial doubt for it to continue as a going concern. The Company will be dependent upon the raising of additional capital through placement of our common stock in order to implement its business plan, or merge with an operating company. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in either situation in order to continue as a going concern. The officers and directors have committed to advancing certain operating costs of the Company.

~~ECO~~The ~~ENERGY~~Company ~~PUMPS,~~was ~~INC~~incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and is not subject to income taxes under the current laws of the British Virgin Islands.

~~(A Development Stage Company)~~Dalei

~~NOTES~~The TOsubsidiary, ~~THE~~Dalei, ~~FINANCIAL~~being ~~STATEMENTS~~registered in the PRC, is subject to PRC’s Enterprise Income Tax (“EIT”).

PRC EIT rate was 25% for the period ended October 31, ~~2009~~2010.

~~NOTE~~Income 3before –income ~~GOING~~tax ~~CONCERN~~expenses ~~(continued)~~of $2,077,179 for the period ended October 31, 2010, was attributed to operations in China. Income tax expense related to China income for the period ended October 31, 2010, was $519,294.

~~The~~No ~~ability~~deferred oftax ~~the~~has ~~Company~~been toprovided ~~continue~~ as athere ~~going~~are ~~concern~~no ismaterial ~~dependent~~temporary ondifferences ~~raising~~arising ~~capital to fund its business plan and ultimately to attain profitable operations. Accordingly, these factors raise substantial doubt as to~~ for the ~~Company’s~~period ~~ability~~ended ~~to continue as a going concern. The Company is funding its initial operations by way of issuing Founder’s shares. As of~~ October 31, ~~2009, the Company had issued 9,300,000 Founder’s shares at $0~~2010.~~001 per share for net funds to the Company of $9,300 and 252,500 shares at $0.02 per share for $5,050~~

~~NOTE~~The 4Company -did ~~FAIR~~not ~~VALUE~~have OFany ~~FINANCIAL~~interest ~~INSTRUMENTS~~and penalty recognized in the income statements for the period ended October 31, 2010 or balance sheet as of October 31, 2010. The Company did not have uncertainty tax positions or events leading to uncertainty tax position within the next 12 months.

~~In accordance with the requirements of ASC 825 , the Company has determined the estimated fair value of financial instruments using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies~~8. ~~The~~ EARNINGS ~~fair~~PER ~~value of financial instruments classified as current assets or liabilities approximate their carrying value due to the short-term maturity of the instruments.~~SHARE

~~NOTE~~The 5Company –calculates ~~CAPITAL~~earnings ~~STOCK~~per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, which requires a dual presentation of basic and diluted earnings per share. Basic earnings per share are computed using the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the fiscal year. Potentially dilutive common shares consist of convertible preferred stock (using the if-converted method) and exercisable warrants and stock options outstanding (using the treasury method). The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net income per common share:

The Company’s capitalization is 75,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.001 per share. No preferred shares have been authorized or issued.

	2010
Net income	$	1,557,885

Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding:
Basic and diluted		36,001,083

Earnings per share:
Basic and diluted	$	0.04

~~As of October 31, 2009, the Company has not granted any stock options and has not recorded any stock-based compensation~~9. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

InThe ~~June,~~Company ~~2009~~has ~~the~~evaluated ~~company~~all ~~received~~other $5subsequent events through January 31,~~050 for~~ 2011, the ~~issues~~date ofthese ~~252~~consolidated financial statements were issued,~~000~~ ~~share~~and atdetermined $0that there were no other subsequent events or transactions that require recognition or disclosures in the financial statements.02

~~NOTE 6 – INCOME TAXES~~15

For the periods ended October 31, 2009, and October 31, 2008, the Company incurred net operating losses and, accordingly, no provision for income taxes has been recorded. In addition, no benefit for income taxes has been recorded due to the uncertainty of the realization of any tax assets. At October 31, 2009, the Company had approximately $22946 federal net operating losses. The net operating loss carryforwards, if not utilized, will begin to expire in 2028 for federal purposes and in 2029 for California purposes.

ECO ENERGY PUMPS, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

October 31, 2009

NOTE 6 – INCOME TAXES (continued)

The components of the Company’s deferred tax assets/liabilities are as follows:

	As of October 31
	2009	2008
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards	22,946	1.295
Total deferred tax assets	22,946	1,295
Net deferred tax assets before valuation allowance	22,946	1,295
Less: Valuation allowance	(22,946)	(1,295)
Net deferred tax assets	$ 0	$ 0

NOTE 7 - SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Company has evaluated subsequent events through March 25, 2010, the date which the financial statements were available to be issued.

NOTE 8 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

As of October 31, 2009, the Company received advances from a Director in the amount of $1,995. The amounts due to the related party are unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand.

NOTE 9 - RESTATEMENT NOTE

Due to an accounting error, the Company has restated its Balance Sheets as at April 30, 2009 and July 30, 2009.

ECO ENERGY PUMPS, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

October 31, 2009

NOTE 9 - RESTATEMENT NOTE (continued)

	YEAR ENDED APRIL 30, 2009
CURRENT LIABILITIES	ORIGINAL	CORRECTION	RESTATED
Accrued Expenses	7,000	300	7,300
Accumulated Deficit	(12,530)	(300)	(12,830)
	YEAR ENDED JULY 30, 2009
CURRENT LIABILITIES	ORIGINAL	CORRECTION	RESTATED
Accrued Expenses	5,000	600	5,600
Accumulated Deficit	(15,530)	(600)	(16,130)

The company had omitted to accrue Edgarising Fees of $300 in each of the two above periods.

The date of issuance of 9,300 shares of Common Stock was previously stated as at October 14, 2008 instead of November 6, 2008

Item 9. Changes and Disagreements with Accounts on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

Our auditors are Seale and Beers, CPAs, PCAOB & CPAB Registered Auditors, operating from their offices in Las Vegas, NV. There have not been any changes in or disagreements with our accountants on accounting, financial disclosure or any other matter.

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Within 90 days prior to the end of the period covered by this report the registrant carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). This evaluation was done under the supervision and with the participation of registrants President and Principal Financial Officer. Based on that Evaluation she concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in gathering, analyzing and disclosing information needed to satisfy the registrant’s disclosure obligations under the Exchange Act.

There were no significant changes in the registrant’s disclosure control and procedure, in factors that could significantly affect those controls and procedures since their most recent evaluation.

Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial report for the company. Internal control over financial reporting is to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Internal control over financial reporting includes maintain records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions; providing reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary for preparation of our financial statements; providing reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures of company assets are made in accordance with management authorization; and providing reasonable assurance that unauthorized acquisition , use or disposition of company assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements would be prevented or detected.

As of October 31, 2009 management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting established in SEC guidance on conducting such assessments. Based on that evaluation, they concluded that, during the period covered by this report, such internal controls and procedures were not effective to detect the inappropriate application of US GAAP rules as more fully described below. This was due to deficiencies that existed in the design or operation of our internal control over financial reporting that adversely affected our internal controls and that may be considered to be material weaknesses.

There have been no significant changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended October 31, 2009 that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal controls over financial reporting.

Part 9B. Other Information

None

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Our directors serve until their respective successors are elected and qualified. John David Palmer has been elected by the Board of Directors to a term of one (1) year and serves until his successor is duly elected and qualified, or until he is removed from office. The Board of Directors has no nominating or compensation committees. The Company’s current Audit Committee consists solely of John David Palmer, the Company’ sole officer and a director.

The names, addresses, ages and positions of our present sole officer and our directors are set forth below:

Name	Age		Position(s)
John David Palmer	57		President, Secretary/ Treasurer, Chief Financial Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors.

John David Palmer has held his offices/positions since inception of our company. Directors receive no compensation for serving on the Board of Directors

Background of officers and Directors

John David Palmer

Mr. Palmer has over 25 years of sales, marketing and management experience in Information Technology, manufacturing and service industries. His strong business background was honed over the past 15 years in senior management positions.

As VP of Marketing for the past 6 years with Morgan and Associates, an accounting/consulting firm primarily involved in evaluating new business opportunities. Mr. Palmer has acquired extensive knowledge of new technologies in hydraulic mixing systems, Fuel Cell applications, solar and wind power generators, salt water pool chlorination systems, etc. Mr. Palmer advised new and existing technology companies on various investment options, from Seed Capital or Equity partners to Mezzanine financing. Numerous roll-up acquisition strategies were funded through the introduction to private equity firms whose focus was to pursue investments in mid market later stage companies with the goal of building value through opportune acquisitions.

From 1998 to 2001, Mr. Palmer was Director of Sales and Customer Service for NBS Technologies, a Visa and MasterCard certified manufacturer of credit and debit cards for Canadian banks, retail and various other financial institutions. Mr. Palmer inherited a sales team that had recently lost two reps in the prime markets of Toronto and Montreal and had a poor internal relationship with their production department. Mr. Palmer hired two senior sales reps to replace the individuals that had departed and joined the competition. Despite the time lost due to the hiring and training of new reps, revenue in the first year dropped by only 4% year over year. Revenue in the second year increased almost 15% with a renewed relationship with clients and internal departments.

From 1994 to 1998, Mr. Palmer held the dual role at Banyan Systems of Canadian Marketing Manager and Channel Manager. By hiring a new PR Agency and involvement in a rigorous trade show calendar, Banyan’s visibility in the Canadian end-user market was greatly enhanced, resulting in revenue increases of approximately 20% each year. Creating innovative programs for the channel partners in Canada and closely managing their training and on-going support solidified the solid relationship between Banyan and their channel partners.

From 1988 to 1994, Mr. Palmer was the Regional Sales Manager for C.Itoh Electronics, a Japanese printer/terminal manufacturer. By closely managing both regional and national accounts in Ontario, Mr. Palmer and his staff maintained revenue growth consistent with Senior Management’s expectations. Managing various co-op and MDF fund programs along with an aggressive trade-show campaign grew the base of resellers and solidified the relationship between the resellers and C.Itoh.

Mr. Palmer is not director of any other reporting company.

Significant Employees

The Company does not, at present, have any employees other than the current director and officer. We have not entered into any employment agreements, as we currently do not have any employees other than the current director and officer.

Family Relations

There are no family relationships among the Directors and Officers of Eco Energy Pumps, Inc.

Involvement in Legal Proceedings

No executive Officer or Director of the Company has been convicted in any criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations) or is the subject of a criminal proceeding that is currently pending.

No executive Officer or Director of the Company is the subject of any pending legal proceedings.

No Executive Officer of the Company is involved in any bankruptcy petition by or against any business in which he is a general partner or executive officer at this time or within two years of any involvement as a general partner, executive officer, or Director of any business.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

Our current executive officer and director has not and does not receive any compensation and has not received any restricted shares awards, options or any other payouts. As such, we have not included a Summary Compensation Table.

There are no current employment agreements between the Company and its executive officer. Our executive officer has agreed to work without remuneration until such time as we receive revenues that are sufficiently necessary to provide proper salaries to the officer and compensate the directors for participation. Our executive officer and director has the responsibility of determining the timing of remuneration programs for key personnel based upon such factors as positive cash flow, shares sales, product sales, estimated cash expenditures, accounts receivable, accounts payable, notes payable, and a cash balances. At this time, management cannot accurately estimate when sufficient revenues will occur to implement this compensation, or the exact amount of compensation.

There are no annuity, pension or retirement benefits proposed to be paid to officers, directors or employees of the corporation in the event of retirement at normal retirement date pursuant to any presently existing plan provided or contributed to by Company.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and related Stockholder Matters

Title of Class	Name and Address of Beneficial Owner [1]	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Owner	Percent of Class
Common Stock	John David Palmer, 2665 Windwood Drive, Suite 208 Mississauga, Ontario, Canada L5N 2P2	9,300,000	69.9%
	All Beneficial Owners as a Group (1 person)	9,300,000	69.9%

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Currently, there are no contemplated transactions that the Company may enter into with our officers, directors or affiliates. If any such transactions are contemplated we will file such disclosure in a timely manner with the Commission on the proper form making such transaction available for the public to view.

The Company has no formal written employment agreement or other contracts with our current officer and director and there is no assurance that the services to be provided by him will be available for any specific length of time in the future. Mr. Palmer anticipates devoting at a minimum of ten to fifteen percent of his available time to the Company’s affairs. The amounts of compensation and other terms of any full time employment arrangements would be determined, if and when, such arrangements become necessary.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009 we expect to incur approximately $3,500 in fees to our principal independent accountants for professional services rendered in connection with the audit of financial statements. For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008, review of the financial statements for the periods ended April 30, 2009 and July 31, 2009; we incurred approximately $3,000 in fees to our independent accountants.

During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009, we did not incur any other fees for professional services rendered by our principal independent accountants for all other non-audit services which may include, but not limited to, tax related services, actuarial services or valuation services.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS

23.1 Consent of SEALE and BEERS, CPAs, PCAOB & CPAB REGISTERED AUDITORS

31.1 Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer

31.2 Rule 13(a)-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer *

32.1 Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer

32.2 Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer **

* Included in Exhibit 31.1

** Included in Exhibit 32.1

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Eco Energy Pumps, Inc.

BY: /s/ John David Palmer

----------------------

John David Palmer

President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer,

Principal Financial Officer and Director

Dated: April 14, 2010

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION

I, John David Palmer, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Eco Energy Pumps, Inc. for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f))for the registrant and have:

a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such internal control over financial report to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period cover by this report based on such evaluation; and

d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of small business issuer’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal controls over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting;

Date: April 14, 2010

/s/ John David Palmer

------------------------------

John David Palmer

President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer,

Principal Financial Officer and Director

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended October 31, 2009 of Eco Energy Pumps, Inc., a Nevada corporation (the “Company”), as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Annual Report”), I, John David Palmer, Chairman, President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:

1. The Annual Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and

2. The information contained in this Annual Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operation of the Company.

Date: April 14, 2010

/s/ John David Palmer

-------------------------------

John David Palmer

President, Secretary Treasurer, Principal Executive Officer,

Principal Financial Officer and Director

Filing Compare · Eco Energy Pumps, Inc.