UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____ to _____

Commission file number 005-82677

IMMUNOSYN CORPORATION

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Delaware	20-5322896
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

10815 Rancho Bernardo Road, Suite 100, San Diego, CA	92127
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)	(Zip Code)

(888) 853-3663

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

10815 Rancho Bernardo Road, Suite 101, San Diego, CA 92127

(Former Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year, if Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer ¨ Accelerated Filer ¨ Non-Accelerated Filer x Smaller reporting Company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x

As of November 19, 2010, the Company had 267,500,219 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding.

PART I

Item 1.

Financial Statements.

Immunosyn Corporation

(A Development Stage Company)

Balance Sheets

(unaudited)

	September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash	$	795		$	976
Prepaid expenses		3,233			3,233
Total Current Assets		4,028			4,209
Property and equipment		6,433			6,433
Accumulated depreciation		(4,717	)		(3,752	)
Deposits		2,791			2,825
Total Assets	$	8,535		$	9,715

LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

Current Liabilities
Accounts payable	$	916,895		$	856,133
Accrued expenses		4,060			6,060
Accrued compensation – related party		76,500			49,500
Accrued legal settlement payable		1,948,000			1,948,000
Advances from affiliates		807,262			668,834
Total Current Liabilities		3,752,717			3,528,527

Shareholders’ Deficit
Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 425,000,000 shares authorized, 267,552,719 shares issued and outstanding		26,755			26,755
Additional paid-in capital		1,604,631			1,563,870
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(5,375,568	)		(5,109,437	)
Total Shareholders’ Deficit		(3,744,182	)		(3,518,812	)

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Deficit	$	8,535		$	9,715

See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.

Immunosyn Corporation

(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Expenses

(unaudited)

	Three Months Ended September 30, 2010			Three Months Ended September 30, 2009			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009			August 3, 2006 (inception) Through September 30, 2010
EXPENSES
General & Administrative	$	40,770		$	162,682		$	186,025		$	672,370		$	5,114,413
Interest Expense		29,266			27,005			80,106			62,259			261,155
NET LOSS	$	(70,036	)	$	(189,687	)	$	(266,131	)	$	(734,629	)	$	(5,375,568	)
Net loss per common share, basic and diluted	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding		267,552,719			270,619,398			267,552,719			271,037,499

See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.

Immunosyn Corporation

(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Cash Flows

(unaudited)

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010			Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009			August 3, 2006 (inception) through September 30, 2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(266,131	)	$	(734,629	)	$	(5,375,568	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Write off of intangible asset		-			-			400,000
Depreciation		965			964			4,717
Imputed interest on advances from affiliates		40,761			54,483			199,927
Services rendered for stock		-			15,350			618,664
Changes in:
Other assets		34			-			(2,791	)
Prepaid expenses		-			38,223			(3,233	)
Accounts payable		60,762			456,929			700,284
Accounts payable – related party		-			-			251,716
Accrued expenses		(2,000)			6,060			4,060
Accrued legal settlement		-			-			1,948,000
Accrued compensation to affiliate		27,000			26,232			76,500
Net cash used in operating activities		(138,609	)		(136,388	)		(1,177,124	)

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment		-			-			(6,433	)
Net cash used in investing activities		-			-			(6,433	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Net advances from affiliates		138,429			135,437			1,207,558
Payment of Debt		-			-			(35,105	)
Sale of common stock		-			-			12,500
Net cash provided by financing activities		138,429			135,437			1,184,953

Net change in cash		(180	)		(951	)		796
Cash at beginning of period		976			2,052			-
Cash at end of period	$	796		$	1,101		$	796
Supplemental Disclosures
Cash paid for interest	$	-		$	-		$	-
Cash paid for income taxes	$	-		$	-		$	-

Non-Cash Investing and Financing Activities
Stock issued for license rights		-			-			400,000
Related party forgiveness of debt		-			-			400,295

See accompanying notes to unaudited financial statements.

Immunosyn Corporation

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Unaudited Interim Financial Statements

Note 1 - BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements of Immunosyn Corporation (“Immunosyn” or the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and should be read in conjunction with Immunosyn’s audited 2009 year end financial statements and notes thereto contained in Immunosyn’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and the results of operations for the interim period have been reflected herein. The results of operations for interim periods are, however, not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Notes to the financial statements which substantially duplicate the disclosure contained in the audited financial statements for fiscal 2009 as reported in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 have been omitted.

The Company does not expect any recent accounting pronouncements to have a material effect on its financial position or results of operations.

Note 2 - GOING CONCERN

During the three and nine months ended September, 2010 and since inception, Immunosyn has been unable to generate cash flows sufficient to support its operations and has been dependent on advances from its affiliates. Advances from affiliates have not been sufficient to cover the Company’s expenses including the salary of its Chief Executive Officer which the Company has been unable to pay since August 2008. In addition to negative cash flow from operations, Immunosyn has experienced recurring net losses and has a negative working capital. These factors raise substantial doubt about Immunosyn’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if Immunosyn is unable to continue as a going concern.

Note 3 - ADVANCES FROM AFFILIATES

As of September 30, 2010, $807,262 is owed by Immunosyn to Argyll Equities, LLC and Argyll Biotechnologies, LLC who together own approximately 59% of Immunosyn’s common stock. These advances are unsecured and may be due on demand. Interest expense of $40,761 was imputed using an interest rate of 7.5% for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and is included in additional paid-in capital. The Company has accrued for an additional $27,000 in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 in compensation to Mr. Ferrone, the Company’s CEO and President, for a total balance of $76,500.

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Overview

Immunosyn is a development stage company that was formed in August 2006 and is headquartered in San Diego, California. In September 2006, it executed an exclusive license agreement with an affiliated company, Argyll Biotechnologies, LLC (“Argyll Biotech”), in exchange for 147,000,000 shares of its Common Stock (the “License Fee”) or approximately 54% of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Common Stock. The license agreement was amended and restated in October 2007 and amended and restated again in May 2010. Pursuant to the terms of the license agreement, as amended, the Company has an exclusive worldwide license to market, distribute and sell a biopharmaceutical drug product, currently referred to as SF-1019, for multiple uses including the treatment of a variety of diseases, subject to the receipt of appropriate regulatory approval in each jurisdiction where SF-1019 will be marketed, none of which has been applied for or received. Under the terms of its exclusive license, Immunosyn also has a right of first offer to extend its exclusive license to include variants of SF-1019 that may be approved by various regulatory authorities for treatment of other diseases and pathologies. Argyll Biotech is responsible for all research and product development, clinical testing, regulatory approvals, production and product support. In accordance with the amended license agreement, the parties agreed that the cost of SF-1019 to the Company will be 40% of the gross sales price of SF-1019 as sold to a third party customer by the Company.

As a sales, marketing, and distribution channel for SF-1019, Immunosyn’s primary business strategy is to build a sales and marketing force and related resources so that if SF-1019 is approved for human use it can be sold; and secondly, to increase awareness and acceptance of SF-1019 in the medical community.

As of the date of this report, we have no revenue and limited operations. Those operations have been principally funded by advances from affiliates. Our ability to obtain additional funding will determine our ability to continue as a going concern. From time to time, we have retained investment bankers and other financial advisors to assist us with our fundraising efforts; however, those efforts have not been successful to date. We have one principal asset, our exclusive license from Argyll Biotech which is recorded on our books at zero, and one full-time and one part-time employee. We do not expect to commence full scale operations or generate revenue unless and until Argyll Biotech accomplishes development and obtains regulatory approval for SF-1019. Since incorporation, we have not made any significant purchases or sale of assets (other than our exclusive license from Argyll Biotech), nor have we been involved in any mergers, acquisitions or consolidations.

Results of Operations

To date, the Company has had no revenue and limited operations. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and since inception, Immunosyn has been unable to generate cash flows sufficient to support its operations and has been dependent on advances from its affiliates. In addition to negative cash flow from operations, Immunosyn has experienced recurring net losses, and has a negative working capital. During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company had a net loss of $266,131 and a loss of $70,036 for the three months ended September 30, 2010, an accumulated deficit of $5,375,568 and a working capital deficit of $3,748,689. In addition, the Company has accounts payable and accrued expenses of $916,895 and $4,060, respectively, as of September 30, 2010. See Note 2 of Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements for our going concern.

Currently, an affiliated company provides general support services to the Company, without charge. In addition, as of September 30, 2010, Immunosyn owes Argyll Equities, LLC and Argyll Biotech, who together own approximately 59% of Immunosyn’s Common Stock, an aggregate of $807,262, including $138,429 which was borrowed during the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Interest expense in the amount of $200,378 was imputed on the aggregate advances from inception to September 30, 2010, including $40,761 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, using an interest rate of 7.5% and is included in additional paid-in capital. These advances are unsecured and may be repayable on demand. In October 2007, the Company hired a Chief Executive Officer. The Company has been unable to pay the CEO’s salary since August 2008. The Company has accrued for an additional $9,000 in compensation to the CEO in the three months ended September 30, 2010 for a total balance of $76,500. In addition, the Company accrued for a default judgment rendered against it on February 1, 2010 in the amount of $1,948,000 plus post judgment interest in accordance with the law in its 2009 audited financial statements. The Court granted the Company’s motion to set aside entry of the default and default judgment against it by order dated June 30, 2010 and the Company filed a response to plaintiff’s complaint on July 14, 2010. See “PART II OTHER INFORMATION, Item 1. Legal Proceedings.”

The Company’s funds have not been sufficient to cover its expenses resulting in a net loss, an accumulated deficit and a working capital deficit as described above. See Note 2 of Notes to Unaudited Financial Statements.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Company needs additional financing to continue its current limited operations and may raise funds in the future privately or publicly if it is able to do so or will continue to look to advances from affiliates who are under no obligation to provide funds to the Company.

In addition, the Company intends to raise working capital through one or more financings to meet the following requirements before it commences full scale operations if and when Argyll Biotech accomplishes development and obtains regulatory approval for SF-1019:

Paying current administrative staff;

hiring staff, a full-time controller and five sales and marketing personnel;

purchasing capital equipment, including securing its principal offices, both executive and sales, and distribution facilities;

monitoring the progress of the research and development effort conducted by Argyll Biotech;

developing a marketing plan for the sale and distribution of SF-1019;

hiring industry consultants to assist in developing a channel strategy for sales and marketing of SF-1019, including direct sales, third party distributors, and strategic partnerships;

developing market awareness in the patient and medical community and educating those effected with various diseases including CIDP, diabetic neuropathy and diabetic ulcers and other diseases; and

selecting and compensating board members.

The Company requires substantial future sources of capital in order to meet such anticipated expenditures and to continue its operations during the period Argyll Biotech accomplishes development of SF-1019 and seeks regulatory approval from US and/or foreign regulatory authorities. The Company currently anticipates this process to be between three and five years and the amount of funds required to be between $14 million and $24 million.

The Company believes that significant funding will be required to provide adequate sources of working capital during that period. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to raise any or all the capital required for its operations. See Note 2 to Unaudited Financial Statements. Failure to obtain future financing will require the Company to delay or substantially curtail its operations or close its business, resulting in a material adverse effect on the Company and its shareholders.

See “Cautionary Statements Regarding Forward Looking Information” below and Item 1A – “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This report includes “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this report, regarding the Company’s financial position, business strategy, plans and objectives, are forward-looking statements. Although the Company believes that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements and the assumptions upon which such forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations and assumptions will prove to have been correct.

In addition, from time to time in the future, the Company may publish “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act, and Section 21E of the Exchange Act or make oral statements that constitute forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements may relate to such matters as anticipated financial performance, future revenues or earnings, business prospects, projected ventures, new products, anticipated market performance, and similar matters.

The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. In order to comply with the terms of the safe harbor, the Company cautions readers that a variety of factors could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Company’s forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, include, but are not limited to: (i) the Company’s ability to raise financing to fund its development and allow it to continue as a going concern; (ii) the effects of the economy on the Company’s ability to find and maintain financing options and liquidity; (iii) general economic conditions, both domestic and international; (iv) Argyll Biotech’s ability to accomplish development of SF-1019 and other products it may acquire or develop and license to the Company; (v) Argyll Biotech’s ability to obtain FDA and/or other regulatory approvals for SF-1019 and other products it may acquire or develop and license to the Company; (vi) competition from existing pharmaceutical, chemical and biotech companies and other participants in the drug and related markets; (vii) legal developments affecting the litigation experience of the Company including the results of any subpoenas issued to the Company or its affiliates by the SEC and any pending lawsuits involving the Company; (viii) the effectiveness of the Company’s efforts to hire qualified personnel; (ix) changes in regulatory requirements which could affect the cost and method of doing business; (x) the Company’s ability to achieve its business plan; (xi) corporate governance issues; (xii) credit, operations, legal and regulatory risks; (xiii) risks related to foreign operations; and (xiv) risks related to disclosure controls and/or internal controls or the lack thereof as discussed in Item 4. There can be no assurance that the Company has correctly or completely identified and assessed all of the factors affecting the Company’s business. The Company does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. See also Item 1A – Risk Factors in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

We do not presently enter into any transactions involving derivative financial instruments for risk management or other purposes.

Our available cash balances are held in our corporate bank account which is non-interest bearing but is insured by the FDIC. We do not currently have any cash flows that arise outside of the United States and today we are not subject to market risk associated with changes in foreign exchange rates.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures.

Controls and Procedures

The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, and under the supervision and with the participation of management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer, who are responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act, such persons conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of these disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation and subject to the foregoing, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer concluded that these controls are not effective because there are material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting.

Immunosyn recognizes the importance of internal controls. As Immunosyn is currently a development stage company with limited ongoing financial operations, management is making an effort to mitigate this material weakness to the fullest extent possible. At present this is done by having the Chief Executive Officer review Immunosyn’s financial statements, account reconciliations and accounts payable reports that have been prepared by Chief Financial Officer for reasonableness. All unexpected results are investigated. At any time, if it appears that any control can be implemented to continue to mitigate such weakness, it will be immediately implemented. As Immunosyn grows in size and as its finances allow, management will hire sufficient accounting staff and implement appropriate procedures for monitoring and review of work performed by our Chief Financial Officer.

Changes in Internal Controls

In our efforts to continuously improve our internal controls, management intends to take steps, when funding permits, to enhance controls and procedures as part of our remediation efforts in addressing the material weaknesses described above and in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. One of the steps management intends to take is to increase documentation around certain authorization and review controls.

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings.

Pursuant to a subpoena dated January 20, 2006 issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission to an affiliate of Argyll Biotech in proceedings captioned In the Matter of Directors Financial Group, Ltd. and In The Matter of Prime Bank Securities, and pursuant to subpoenas issued by the SEC to affiliates of Argyll Biotech on March 30, 2006 and to Immunosyn on December 15, 2006 in a proceeding captioned In The Matter of The Argyll Group, LLC, Immunosyn and its affiliates have been asked to produce all documents concerning a wide variety of topics including many related directly to Immunosyn. Immunosyn and Argyll Biotech’s affiliates actively cooperated with the SEC and produced documents responsive to these subpoenas, completing their responses in early August 2007. The Directors Financial Group matter was resolved in June 2006 through a settlement between the SEC and the parties to the proceeding, and, accordingly, Immunosyn will not be required to respond further to that subpoena. Immunosyn had had no further communication with the SEC regarding the remaining subpoenas since January 2007 until March 2009. On or about March 17, 2009, representatives of both Immunosyn and Argyll Biotech became aware that they had received additional subpoenas from the SEC on or about March 6, 2009 (the “March 2009 Subpoenas”). In addition, on or about June 4, 2009, Immunosyn directors and officers, Douglas A. McClain, Jr. and Stephen Ferrone, received subpoenas from the SEC (the “June 2009 Subpoenas”) as did James T. Miceli, a director and officer of Argyll Biotech, and Douglas A. McClain, Sr. Immunosyn and Argyll Biotech subsequently learned from the SEC that the March 2009 Subpoenas and the June 2009 Subpoenas would be treated as voluntary requests. On or about September 11, 2009, Immunosyn and Immunosyn directors and officers, Douglas A. McClain, Jr. and Stephen Ferrone, received additional subpoenas from the SEC as did James T. Miceli, a director and officer of Argyll Biotech, and Douglas A. McClain, Sr. The Company and its affiliates have responded to these subpoenas.

On or about July 27, 2006, Daval filed suit in the High Court of Justice, Chancery Division in London, England against Argyll Biotech and five of Argyll Biotech’s research scientists and others, including Douglas McClain, Sr., seeking an injunction and damages or an account of profits based on allegations of breach by the scientists and Mr. McClain of confidentiality agreements with Daval, breaches by such persons of their fiduciary duties and conspiracy by Argyll Biotech and certain of its shareholders to wrongfully disclose and use Daval’s alleged trade secrets. These proceedings do not allege infringement of any Daval patent whether by Argyll Biotech or any of the other defendants. Argyll Biotech has filed its defenses and continues to investigate the merits of the suit and the basis of its defenses including, among other grounds, that one of the active ingredients in SF-1019 disclosed in Argyll Biotech’s 603 Application is based on independent research by Argyll Biotech’s research scientists, and the method of producing SF-1019 is materially different from Daval’s process. The action had been listed for trial in the UK in January 2009 but, in December 2008, the High Court in London ordered that the trial be rescheduled for a later date. Immunosyn is not involved in this litigation.

On August 25, 2009, a complaint was filed by Myron W. Wentz, a shareholder of the Company, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California that named as defendants Argyll Biotech, Immunosyn and Does 1-10. The complaint alleged, among other things, that Argyll Biotech breached its contract with the plaintiff and that Immunosyn tortiously interfered with Argyll Biotech’s contract with the plaintiff. The complaint sought damages in the amount of $1,948,000 plus pre- and post-judgment interest; consequential damages and attorneys fees in an amount to be proven at trial against Argyll Biotech for breach of contract; an order compelling Argyll Biotech to provide 14,984,615 shares of common stock of the Company to Dr. Wentz; and attorneys fees’ in an amount to be proven at trial. On February 1, 2010, a default judgment was entered against Immunosyn in favor of the plaintiff, Dr. Wentz, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California in the amount of $1,948,000.00 plus post-judgment interest in accordance with the law. The Company accrued for this default judgment in its 2009 audited financial statements. A default judgment was also entered against Argyll Biotech. On June 4, 2010, Immunosyn filed a motion to set aside the default and default judgment against it. The Court granted the Company’s motion to set aside entry of the default and default judgment against it by order dated June 30, 2010. The Company filed a response to plaintiff’s complaint on July 14, 2010. The Company and the plaintiff have reached a tentative settlement resolving the matter which is in the process of being formalized. If the settlement is not formalized, Immunosyn intends to vigorously defend against the allegations of tortious interference contained in the complaint which it believes to be untrue and without merit.

On August 24, 2009, a complaint was filed by Denise Campbell on behalf of a putative class in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas that names as defendants Immunosyn, Argyll Biotech, James T. Miceli, Douglas A. McClain, Jr., Frank Morales, Argyll Equities, LLC, Stephen Ferrone and Douglass A. McClain, Sr. The complaint alleges, among other things, that the defendants have made false and/or misleading statements concerning Immunosyn and SF-1019 in filings with the SEC in violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including Section 10b-5 thereof, including, without limitation, that the Food & Drug Administration had not approved SF-1019 for human injection, that SF-1019 had not received compassionate waiver status, that SF-1019 was on clinical hold, that SF-1019 had negative results in certain safety studies, that SF-1019 was being sold by the defendants outside of the exclusive license held by Immunosyn and that Alan Osmond was being paid to promote SF-1019; defendants have committed fraud in their SEC disclosures and on their websites; defendants have engaged in civil conspiracy; defendants have been unjustly enriched through the sale of Immunosyn stock; and James T. Miceli, Douglas McClain, Sr. and Douglas McClain Jr. have committed RICO violations and conspired to violate RICO. The complaint seeks damages in an amount to be proven at trial, plus interest, costs and attorneys’ fees. The parties, including Immunosyn, answered the complaint on October 16, 2009. An initial telephonic pretrial conference among attorneys was held on January 19, 2010 and discovery has commenced. The defendants have filed a Motion to Dismiss based upon the plaintiff’s failure to state a cause of action for securities fraud. The Court granted leave for the plaintiff to amend her complaint to correct the deficiencies, which she did. The defendants have filed a second Motion to Dismiss, asserting that the plaintiff failed to correct the deficiencies in her amended complaint and failed to adequately plead causes of action for RICO and conspiracy to commit RICO. The defendants’ second Motion to Dismiss is still pending before the Court. The defendants will also challenge the plaintiff’s attempt to certify the plaintiff’s cause of action as a class, when appropriate. Immunosyn intends to vigorously defend against the allegations contained in the complaint which it believes to be untrue and without merit.

On November 24, 2009, a complaint was filed by Robert Albergo and David Irwin in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California that names as defendants, amongst others, the Company and its directors and officers, Douglas A. McClain, Jr. and Stephen Ferrone. The complaint was not served until March 15, 2010. On May 10, 2010, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. The amended complaint alleges, among other things, that certain of the defendants, including the Company, McClain and Ferrone, have made false and/or misleading statements concerning Immunosyn and SF-1019 in filings with the SEC in violation of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including Section 10b-5 thereof, have committed RICO violations and conspired to violate RICO and have engaged in civil conspiracy. The amended complaint seeks multiple forms of relief including compensatory damages in an amount to be proven at trial, punitive damages and treble damages, plus interest, costs and attorneys’ fees. An initial conference with the judge was held on May 25, 2010. The parties, including Immunosyn, answered the complaint on or about June 15, 2010. A case management conference is currently scheduled for late December 2010. Immunosyn intends to vigorously defend against the allegations contained in the complaint which it believes to be untrue and without merit and to have been brought against it for an improper purpose.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors.

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, there were no material changes to the information contained in Part I, Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, but see “CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION” in Part I, Item 2, above.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

(A) and (B) Not applicable.

(C) The Company has no repurchase plans or programs. As previously disclosed, 1,689,000 shares of common stock of the Company were acquired and put into treasury stock on March 16, 2009 as part of a settlement agreement with a shareholder. The purchase price was zero. In addition, an aggregate of 52,500 shares of common stock of the Company were acquired and put into treasury stock on November 1, 2010 as part of settlement agreements with two separate shareholders.

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

Not applicable.

Item 4.

Other Information.

None.

Item 5.

Exhibits.

(d) The following exhibits are filed with this Report.

Exhibit Number	Description

31.1*	Certification of Stephen D. Ferrone, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2*	Certification of Douglas A. McClain, Jr., Chief Financial and Accounting Officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1*	Certification of Stephen D. Ferrone, Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2*	Certification of Douglas A. McClain, Jr., Chief Financial and Accounting Officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

____________________________

*	Filed Herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Dated: November 19, 2010

	IMMUNOSYN CORPORATION

	By:	/s/ Douglas A. McClain, Jr.
		Douglas A. McClain, Jr. Chief Financial and Accounting Officer

IMMUNOSYN CORP 10-Q