UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

	[X]	ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
		For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2008
For the fiscal year ended October 31, 2009
	[ ]	TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
For the transition period from _________ to ________		~~For the transition period from _________ to ________~~
Commission file number: 000-52920		~~Commission file number: 000-52920~~

Fire from Ice, Inc. (Formerly Roman Acquisition Corp.) (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	26-0808384
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
10/75 Waterway Drive, Golden Coast Marine Precinct Coomera QLD Australia	4209
42 Brittanic Crescent, Soveriegn Island, QLD (AU) 4216	4209
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number: (310) 994-7988
Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:
Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
none	not applicable
None	not applicable
Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:
Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $0.001	not applicable

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X]

Check whether the Issuer (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer [ ]	Accelerated filer [ ]
Non-accelerated filer [ ]	Smaller reporting company [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [X] No [ ]

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. Not available

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. 34,~~000~~200,000 as of ~~October~~March 3112, ~~2008~~2010.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I
Item 1.	Business	34
Item 2.	Properties	5
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	5
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	5
PART II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	6
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	76
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	7
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	139
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	1310
Item 9.	Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	1310
Item 9A(T).	Controls and Procedures	1310
Item 9B.	Other Information	1510
PART III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	1611
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	1713
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	2014
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	2015
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	2015
PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules	2116

Table of Contents

PART I

Item 1. Business

Company Overview

We were incorporated as Roman Acquisition Corp. in the State of Nevada on August 27, 2007. We have been in the developmental stage since inception and have conducted virtually no business operations, other than organizational activities and preparation of required filings. We have no full-time employees and own no real estate or personal property.

We were organized as a vehicle to investigate and, if such investigation warrants, acquire a target company or business seeking the perceived advantages of being a publicly held corporation. All of our outstanding stock is currently owned by Mr. Micheal Nugent, who is also our current ~~sole~~Chief ~~officer~~Executive Officer and director and Mr. Robert Smith, our Corporate Secretary. Mr. Nugent is currently evaluating business opportunities for our company, but has not located anything suitable as of the date of this report. Accordingly, we do not currently engage in any business activities that provide cash flow.

Micheal Nugent is our ~~President, Secretary,~~ Chief Executive Officer, ~~Chief Financial Officer,~~ and ~~sole~~Board ~~director~~Chairman.

Our Business

Our company, based on proposed business activities, is a "blank check" company. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC") defines those companies as "any development stage company that is issuing a penny stock, within the meaning of Section 3 (a)(51) of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (the "Exchange Act") and that has no specific business plan or purpose, or has indicated that its business plan is to merge with an unidentified company or companies." Under SEC Rule 12b-2 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), we also qualify as a "shell company," because we have no or nominal assets (other than cash) and no or nominal operations. Many states have enacted statutes, rules and regulations limiting the sale of securities of "blank check" companies in their respective jurisdictions. Management does not intend to undertake any efforts to cause a market to develop in our securities, either debt or equity, until we have successfully concluded a business combination. We intend to comply with the periodic reporting requirements of the Exchange Act for so long as we are subject to those requirements.

We were organized as a vehicle to investigate and, if such investigation warrants, acquire a target company or business seeking the perceived advantages of being a publicly held corporation. Our principal business objective for the next 12 months and beyond such time will be to achieve long-term growth potential through a combination with a business rather than immediate, short-term earnings. We will not restrict our potential candidate target companies to any specific business, industry or geographical location and, thus, may acquire any type of business.

3The analysis of new business opportunities is being undertaken by or under the supervision of Mr. Micheal Nugent. As of this date, we have not entered into any definitive agreement with any party, nor have there been any specific discussions with any potential business combination candidate regarding business opportunities for us. We have unrestricted flexibility in seeking, analyzing and participating in potential business opportunities. In our efforts to analyze potential acquisition targets, we will consider the following kinds of factors:

Table of Contents

The analysis of new business opportunities is being undertaken by or under the supervision of Mr. Micheal Nugent, our sole officer and director. As of this date, we have not entered into any definitive agreement with any party, nor have there been any specific discussions with any potential business combination candidate regarding business opportunities for us. We have unrestricted flexibility in seeking, analyzing and participating in potential business opportunities. In our efforts to analyze potential acquisition targets, we will consider the following kinds of factors:

· Potential for growth, indicated by new technology, anticipated market expansion or new products;

· Competitive position as compared to other firms of similar size and experience within the industry segment as well as within the industry as a whole;

· Strength and diversity of management, either in place or scheduled for recruitment;

· Capital requirements and anticipated availability of required funds, to be provided by us or from operations, through the sale of additional securities, through joint ventures or similar arrangements or from

other sources;

· The cost of participation as compared to the perceived tangible and intangible values and potentials;

· The extent to which the business opportunity can be advanced;

· The accessibility of required management expertise, personnel, raw materials, services, professional assistance and other required items; and

· Other relevant factors.

-4-

In applying the foregoing criteria, no one of which will be controlling, management will attempt to analyze all factors and circumstances and make a determination based upon reasonable investigative measures and available data. Potentially available business opportunities may occur in many different industries, and at various stages of development, all of which will make the task of comparative investigation and analysis of such business opportunities extremely difficult and complex. Due to our limited capital available for investigation, we may not discover or adequately evaluate adverse facts about the opportunity to be acquired.

No assurances can be given that we will be able to enter into a business combination, as to the terms of a business combination, or as to the nature of the target company.

Competition

We are in a highly competitive market for a small number of business opportunities which could reduce the likelihood of consummating a successful business combination. We are and will continue to be an insignificant participant in the business of seeking mergers with, joint ventures with and acquisitions of small private and public entities. A large number of established and well-financed entities, including small public companies and venture capital firms, are active in mergers and acquisitions of companies that may be desirable target candidates for us. Nearly all these entities have significantly greater financial resources, technical expertise and managerial capabilities than we do; consequently, we will be at a competitive disadvantage in identifying possible business opportunities and successfully completing a business combination. These competitive factors may reduce the likelihood of our identifying and consummating a successful business combination.

Table of Contents

Intellectual Property

We do not own any patent, trademark, or legally enforceable claim to proprietary intellectual property.

Employees

We have no employees. The ~~other~~Company ~~than~~officers ~~our~~and ~~sole~~directors ~~officer~~are ~~and~~currently fulfilling ~~director,~~their ~~Micheal Nugent~~roles via consulting agreements.

Research and Development Expenditures

We have not incurred any research or development expenditures since our incorporation.

Government Regulation

Government regulation and compliance with environmental laws do not have a material effect on our business. We are subject to the laws and regulations of those jurisdictions in which we plan to operate and sell our products, which are generally applicable to business operations, such as business licensing requirements, income taxes and payroll taxes.

Subsidiaries

We do not have any subsidiaries.

Item 2. Properties

We do not presently lease or own any real property.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are not a party to any pending legal proceeding. We are not aware of any pending legal proceeding to which any of our officers, directors, or any beneficial holders of 5% or more of our voting securities are adverse to us or have a material interest adverse to us.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

No matters were submitted to a vote of the Company's shareholders during the fiscal year ended October 31, ~~2008~~2009.

-5-

Table of Contents

PART II

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Market Information

We do not have a trading symbol, and our Common Stock is not trading on any stock exchange. We are not aware of any market activity in our stock since its inception and through the date of this filing.

Penny Stock

The SEC has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Penny stocks are generally equity securities with a market price of less than $5.00, other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or system. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC, that: (a) contains a description of the nature and level of risk in the market for penny stocks in both public offerings and secondary trading; (b) contains a description of the broker's or dealer's duties to the customer and of the rights and remedies available to the customer with respect to a violation of such duties or other requirements of the securities laws; (c) contains a brief, clear, narrative description of a dealer market, including bid and ask prices for penny stocks and the significance of the spread between the bid and ask price; (d) contains a toll-free telephone number for inquiries on disciplinary actions; (e) defines significant terms in the disclosure document or in the conduct of trading in penny stocks; and (f) contains such other information and is in such form, including language, type size and format, as the SEC shall require by rule or regulation.

The broker-dealer also must provide, prior to effecting any transaction in a penny stock, the customer with (a) bid and offer quotations for the penny stock; (b) the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction; (c) the number of shares to which such bid and ask prices apply, or other comparable information relating to the depth and liquidity of the market for such stock; and (d) a monthly account statement showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account.

In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written acknowledgment of the receipt of a risk disclosure statement, a written agreement as to transactions involving penny stocks, and a signed and dated copy of a written suitability statement.

Table of Contents

These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the trading activity for our common stock should our stock ever be traded on a public market. Therefore, stockholders may have difficulty selling our securities.

Holders of Our Common Stock

As of October 31, ~~2008~~2009, we had 34,~~000~~200,000 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding, held by our sole shareholder, Mr. Nugent, who is also our Chief ~~sole~~Executive ~~officer~~Officer and director, and Mr. Robert Smith, our Corporate Secretary.

Dividends

We have not paid any cash dividends to date and does not anticipate or contemplate paying dividends in the foreseeable future. It is the present intention of management to utilize all available funds for the development of our business.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

We do not have any equity compensation plans.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

-6-

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives, and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words “believes,” “project,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates,” “intends,” “strategy,” “plan,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “will be,” “will continue,” “will likely result,” and similar expressions. We intend such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe-harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and are including this statement for purposes of complying with those safe-harbor provisions. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Our ability to predict results or the actual effect of future plans or strategies is inherently uncertain. Factors which could have a material adverse affect on our operations and future prospects on a consolidated basis include, but are not limited to: changes in economic conditions, legislative/regulatory changes, availability of capital, interest rates, competition, and generally accepted accounting principles. These risks and uncertainties should also be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. We undertake no obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Further information concerning our business, including additional factors that could materially affect our financial results, is included herein and in our other filings with the SEC.

Table of Contents

Plan of Operation in the Next Twelve Months

We were organized as a vehicle to investigate and, if such investigation warrants, acquire a target company or business seeking the perceived advantages of being a publicly held corporation. Our principal business objective for the next 12 months and beyond such time will be to achieve long-term growth potential through a combination with a business rather than immediate, short-term earnings. We will not restrict our potential candidate target companies to any specific business, industry or geographical location and, thus, may acquire any type of business.

We do not currently engage in any business activities that provide cash flow. The costs of investigating and analyzing business combinations for the next 12 months and beyond such time will be paid with money in our treasury, if any, or with additional money contributed by Micheal Nugent, ~~our~~another ~~sole stockholder,~~ officer ~~and~~or director, or another source.

During the next 12 months, we anticipate incurring costs related to filing of Exchange Act reports and costs relating to consummating an acquisition. We believe we will be able to meet these costs through use of funds in our treasury and additional amounts, as necessary, to be loaned to or invested in us by our stockholders, management or other investors.

We may consider a business which has recently commenced operations, is a developing company in need of additional funds for expansion into new products or markets, is seeking to develop a new product or service, or is an established business which may be experiencing financial or operating difficulties and is in need of additional capital. In the alternative, a business combination may involve the acquisition of, or merger with, a company which does not need substantial additional capital, but which desires to establish a public trading market for its shares, while avoiding, among other things, the time delays, significant expense, and loss of voting control which may occur in a public offering.

~~Our sole officer and director,~~ Mr. Micheal Nugent, has not had any preliminary contact or discussions with any representative of any other entity regarding a business combination with us. Any target business that is selected may be a financially unstable company or an entity in its early stages of development or growth, including entities without established records of sales or earnings. In that event, we will be subject to numerous risks inherent in the business and operations of financially unstable and early stage or potential emerging growth companies. In addition, we may effect a business combination with an entity in an industry characterized by a high level of risk, and, although our management will endeavor to evaluate the risks inherent in a particular target business, there can be no assurance that we will properly ascertain or assess all significant risks.

Table of Contents

Our management anticipates that it will likely be able to effect only one business combination, due primarily to our limited financing, and the dilution of interest for present and prospective stockholders, which is likely to occur as a result of our management's plan to offer a controlling interest to a target business in order to achieve a tax-free reorganization. This lack of diversification should be considered a substantial risk in investing in us, because it will not permit us to offset potential losses from one venture against gains from another.

-7-

We anticipate that the selection of a business combination will be complex and extremely risky. Because of general economic conditions, rapid technological advances being made in some industries and shortages of available capital, our management believes that there are numerous firms seeking even the limited additional capital that we will have and/or the perceived benefits of becoming a publicly traded corporation. Such perceived benefits of becoming a publicly traded corporation include, among other things, facilitating or improving the terms on which additional equity financing may be obtained, providing liquidity for the principals of and investors in a business, creating a means for providing incentive stock options or similar benefits to key employees, and offering greater flexibility in structuring acquisitions, joint ventures and the like through the issuance of stock. Potentially available business combinations may occur in many different industries and at various stages of development, all of which will make the task of comparative investigation and analysis of such business opportunities extremely difficult and complex.

Significant Equipment

We do not intend to purchase any significant equipment for the next twelve months.

Employees

We do not have plans to change the number of our employees during the next twelve months.

Results of Operations for the year ended October 31, ~~2008~~2009 and for the period from August 27, 2007 (Date of Inception) until October 31, ~~2008~~2009

We have not earned any revenues since our inception on August 27, 2007. We do not anticipate earning revenues until such a time that we will be able to enter into a business combination.

We incurred operating expenses in the amount of $1715,~~555~~324, including interest of $1,157 for the year ended October 31, ~~2008~~2009, compared with $~~455~~18,040, including interest of $485, for the year ended October 31, ~~2007~~2008. The ~~entire~~ entire amount for both periods was attributable to general and administrative expenses. We have incurred total operating expenses of $1833,~~010~~819, including interest of $1,642 from inception on August 27, 2007 through October 31, ~~2008~~2009. The entire amount was attributable to general and administrative expenses.

We anticipate our operating expenses will increase as we more fully implement our business plan. The increase will be attributable to expenses to operating our business, and the professional fees to be incurred in connection with our reporting obligations as a public company as our business activity increases.

Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of October 31, ~~2007~~2009, we had no current assets~~. We had $15~~,~~010~~ inno ~~current~~ liabilities asand ofno ~~October 31, 2008. Thus, we had a~~ working ~~capital deficit of~~ ~~$15,010 as of October 31, 2008~~capital. We currently do not engage nor intend to engage in any business activities that provide cash flow until we enter into a successful business combination.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of October 31, ~~2008~~2009, there were no off balance sheet arrangements.

Going Concern

Our financial statements are prepared using generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. We have had no revenues and have generated no operations.

In order to continue as a going concern and achieve a profitable level of operation, we will need, among other things, additional capital resources and to develop a consistent source of revenues. Management's plans include seeking a merger with an existing operating company.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to successfully accomplish the plan described in the preceding paragraph and eventually attain profitable operations. The accompanying financial statements in this report do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if we are unable to continue as a going concern.

-8-

Critical Accounting Policies

In December 2001, the SEC requested that all registrants list their most “critical accounting polices” in the Management Discussion and Analysis. The SEC indicated that a “critical accounting policy” is one which is both important to the portrayal of a company’s financial condition and results, and requires management’s most difficult, subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In June ~~2008~~ 2009, the ~~FASB~~Financial ~~issued~~Accounting Standards Board (FASB) ~~Staff~~issued ~~Position~~ASC ~~EITF~~Statement ~~03-6-1,~~No. 105. ~~Determining~~The ~~Whether~~FASB ~~Instruments Granted~~Accounting inStandards ~~Share-Based~~Codification ~~Payment~~and ~~Transactions~~the ~~Are~~Hierarchy ~~Participating~~of ~~Securities,~~Generally ~~(“FSP~~Accepted ~~EITF~~Accounting ~~03-6-1”~~Principles (ASC 105). ASC ~~FSP~~105 ~~EITF~~has ~~03-6-1~~become ~~addresses~~the single ~~whether~~source ~~instruments~~authoritative ~~granted~~nongovernmental ~~in share-based~~U.S. ~~payment~~generally ~~transactions~~accepted ~~are~~accounting principles ~~participating~~(GAAP), ~~securities~~superseding ~~prior~~existing ~~to vesting~~FASB, ~~and~~ ~~therefore~~American ~~need~~Institute toof beCertified Public ~~included~~Accountants, inEmerging ~~the~~Issues ~~computation~~Task ofForce, ~~earnings~~and ~~per~~related ~~share under~~accounting ~~the~~literature. ASC ~~two-class~~105 ~~method~~reorganized asthe ~~described~~thousands ~~in FASB Statement~~ of ~~Financial~~GAAP ~~Accounting~~pronouncements ~~Standards~~into ~~No. 128,~~roughly ~~“Earnings~~90 ~~per~~accounting ~~Share.”~~topics ~~FSP~~and ~~EITF~~displays ~~03-6-1~~them isusing ~~effective~~a ~~for~~consistent ~~financial~~structure. Also ~~statements~~included ~~issued~~is ~~for~~relevant ~~fiscal~~SEC ~~years~~guidance ~~beginning~~organized onusing ~~or after~~the ~~December 15,~~same ~~2008~~topical ~~and~~structure ~~earlier~~in ~~adoption~~separate ~~is prohibited~~sections. The WeCompany ~~are~~adopted ~~not required~~ASC to105 ~~adopt~~on ~~FSP~~July ~~EITF 03-6-~~1;, ~~neither~~2009. The doadoption weof ~~believe~~ASC ~~that~~105 ~~FSP~~did ~~EITF~~not ~~03-6-1 would~~ have ~~material~~ ~~effect~~an impact on ~~our~~the ~~consolidated~~Company’s financial position ~~and~~ or results of ~~operations~~ ~~if adopted~~operations.

On April 1, 2009, the Company adopted ASC 825-10-65, Financial Instruments – Overall – Transition and Open Effective Date Information (ASC 825-10-65). ASC 825-10-65 amends ASC 825-10 to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial statements as well as in annual financial statements and also amends ASC 270-10 to require those disclosures in all interim financial statements. The adoption of ASC 825-10-65 did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

~~Table~~On April 1, 2009, the Company adopted ASC 855, Subsequent Events (ASC 855). ASC 855 establishes general standards of ~~Contents~~accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. It requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date – that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. This disclosure should alert all users of financial statements that an entity has not evaluated subsequent events after that date in the set of financial statements being presented. The adoption of ASC 855 did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

~~In May~~On ~~2008~~July 1, 2009, the ~~Financial~~Company ~~Accounting~~adopted ~~Standards~~ASU ~~Board~~No. 2009-05, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (~~“FASB”~~Topic 820) ~~issued~~(ASU ~~SFAS No~~2009-05). ~~163, “Accounting~~ASU ~~for~~2009-05 ~~Financial~~provided ~~Guarantee~~amendments ~~Insurance~~to ~~Contracts~~ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and ~~interpretation~~Disclosures of– ~~FASB~~Overall, ~~Statement~~for the Nofair value measurement of liabilities. ASU 2009-05 provides clarification ~~60”. SFAS No.~~that ~~163~~in ~~clarifies~~circumstances ~~how~~in ~~Statement~~which 60a ~~applies~~quoted toprice ~~financial~~in ~~guarantee~~an ~~insurance~~active market for the ~~contracts~~identical liability is not available, ~~including~~a ~~the~~reporting ~~recognition~~entity ~~and~~is ~~measurement~~required ~~of premium~~to measure ~~revenue~~fair ~~and~~value ~~claims~~using ~~liabilities~~certain techniques. ~~This~~ASU ~~statement~~2009-05 also ~~requires~~clarifies ~~expanded~~that when ~~disclosures~~estimating ~~about~~the ~~financial~~fair ~~guarantee~~value ~~insurance~~of ~~contracts.~~a ~~SFAS~~liability, ~~No.~~a ~~163~~reporting entity is ~~effective~~ ~~for~~not ~~fiscal~~required ~~years~~to include ~~beginning~~a onseparate input or ~~after~~adjustment ~~December~~to ~~15,~~other ~~2008,~~inputs ~~and~~relating ~~interim~~to the existence ~~periods~~of ~~within~~a ~~those~~restriction ~~years.~~that ~~SFAS~~prevents Nothe transfer of a liability. ~~163~~ASU ~~has~~2009-05 also clarifies that both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability at the measurement date and the quoted price for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no ~~effect~~adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value measurements. The adoption of ASU 2009-05 did not have a material impact on the Company’s ~~financial~~ ~~position, statements~~ results of operations, or ~~cash~~financial ~~flows at this time~~condition.

In ~~May~~ ~~2008~~October 2009, the ~~Financial~~FASB ~~Accounting~~issued ~~Standards~~ASU ~~Board~~2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, (~~“FASB”)~~amendments ~~issued~~to ~~SFAS~~ASC No605, Revenue Recognition) (ASU 2009-13). ASU ~~162,~~2009-13 requires entities to allocate revenue in an ~~“The~~arrangement ~~Hierarchy~~using estimated selling prices of ~~Generally~~the delivered goods and services ~~Accepted~~based ~~Accounting~~on ~~Principles”. SFAS~~a Noselling price hierarchy. ~~162~~The ~~sets~~amendments ~~forth~~ eliminate the ~~level~~residual method of ~~authority~~revenue toallocation aand ~~given~~require ~~accounting~~revenue ~~pronouncement~~to orbe ~~document~~allocated byusing the relative ~~category.~~selling ~~Where~~price ~~there~~method. ASU ~~might~~2009-13 should be ~~conflicting~~applied ~~guidance~~on ~~between~~a ~~two~~prospective basis ~~categories,~~for ~~the more~~revenue ~~authoritative~~arrangements ~~category~~entered ~~will~~into ~~prevail.~~or ~~SFAS~~materially ~~No.~~modified ~~162~~in ~~will~~fiscal years ~~become~~beginning ~~effective~~on ~~60 days~~or after ~~the~~June 15, ~~SEC~~2010, ~~approves~~with ~~the~~early ~~PCAOB’s~~adoption ~~amendments~~permitted. The toCompany AUdoes ~~Section~~not ~~411~~expect adoption of ~~the AICPA~~ASU ~~Professional~~2009-13 ~~Standards.~~to ~~SFAS~~have ~~No.~~a ~~162~~material ~~has~~impact ~~no effect~~ on the Company’s ~~financial~~ ~~position,~~results ~~statements~~ of operations, or ~~cash~~financial ~~flows at this time~~condition.

In March 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133. This standard requires companies to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under Statement 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Company has not yet adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 161, but does not expect it to have a material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2007, the SEC issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) No. 110 regarding the use of a "simplified" method, as discussed in SAB No. 107 (SAB 107), in developing an estimate of expected term of "plain vanilla" share options in accordance with SFAS No. 123 (R), Share-Based Payment. In particular, the staff indicated in SAB 107 that it will accept a company's election to use the simplified method, regardless of whether the company has sufficient information to make more refined estimates of expected term. At the time SAB 107 was issued, the staff believed that more detailed external information about employee exercise behavior (e.g., employee exercise patterns by industry and/or other categories of companies) would, over time, become readily available to companies. Therefore, the staff stated in SAB 107 that it would not expect a company to use the simplified method for share option grants after December 31, 2007. The staff understands that such detailed information about employee exercise behavior may not be widely available by December 31, 2007. Accordingly, the staff will continue to accept, under certain circumstances, the use of the simplified method beyond December 31, 2007. The Company currently uses the simplified method for “plain vanilla” share options and warrants, and will assess the impact of SAB 110 for fiscal year 2009. It is not believed that this will have an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Table of Contents

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51. This statement amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an

ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. Before this statement was issued, limited guidance existed for reporting noncontrolling interests. As a result, considerable diversity in practice existed. So-called minority interests were reported in the consolidated statement of financial position as liabilities or in the mezzanine section between liabilities and equity. This statement improves comparability by eliminating that diversity. This statement is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15, 2008 (that is, January 1, 2009, for entities with calendar year-ends). Earlier adoption is prohibited. The effective date of this statement is the same as that of the related Statement 141 (revised 2007). The Company will adopt this Statement beginning March 1, 2009. It is not believed that this will have an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In December 2007, the FASB, issued FAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations.’This Statement replaces FASB Statement No. 141, Business Combinations, but retains the fundamental requirements in Statement 141. This Statement establishes principles and requirements for how the acquirer: (a) recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree; (b) recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase; and (c) determines what information to disclose to enable users of the financial statements to evaluate the nature and financial effects of the business combination. This statement applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. An entity may not apply it before that date. The effective date of this statement is the same as that of the related FASB Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company will adopt this statement beginning March 1, 2009. It is not believed that this will have an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2007, the FASB, issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Liabilities—Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. This standard permits an entity to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This option is available to all entities. Most of the provisions in FAS 159 are elective; however, an amendment to FAS 115 Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities applies to all entities with available for sale or trading securities. Some requirements apply differently to entities that do not report net income. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of the beginning of an entities first fiscal year that begins after November 15, 2007. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of the previous fiscal year provided that the entity makes that choice in the first 120 days of that fiscal year and also elects to apply the provisions of SFAS No. 157 Fair Value Measurements. The Company adopted SFAS No. 159 beginning March 1, 2008. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Table of Contents

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements, the Board having previously concluded in those accounting pronouncements that fair value is the relevant measurement attribute. Accordingly, this statement does not require any new fair value measurements. However, for some entities, the application of this statement will change current practice. This statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Earlier application is encouraged, provided that the reporting entity has not yet issued financial statements for that fiscal year, including financial statements for an interim period within that fiscal year. The Company adopted this statement March 1, 2008. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

A smaller reporting company is not required to provide the information required by this Item.

-9-

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

See the financial statements annexed to this annual report.

Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

NoOn ~~events~~June ~~occurred~~17, ~~requiring~~2009, ~~disclosure~~the ~~under~~Company ~~Item~~changed ~~307~~its ~~and~~principal ~~308~~independent accountants. On ofsuch ~~Regulation~~date, ~~S-K~~the ~~during~~Registrant dismissed Moore and Associates, Chartered Accountants and Advisors from serving as the ~~fiscal~~Registrant’s principal ~~year~~independent ~~ending~~accountants, ~~October~~and 31retained M&K CPAS, ~~2008~~PLLC as its principal independent accountants. The decision to change accountants was recommended and approved by the Registrant’s Board of Directors.

Item 9A(T). Controls and Procedures

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act. This rule defines internal control over financial reporting as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

•

Pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and dispositions;

•

Provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Company; and

Table of Contents

•

Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. In addition, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

With the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Based on this evaluation, our management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of October 31, ~~2008~~2009, as the result of a material weakness. The material weakness results from significant deficiencies in internal control that collectively constitute a material weakness.

A significant deficiency is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of the registrant’s financial reporting. We had the following significant deficiencies at October 31, ~~2008~~2009:

·	We have only one employee to oversee bank reconciliations, posting payables, and so forth, so there are no checks and balances on internal controls.

Remediation of Material Weakness

We are unable to remedy the material weakness in our internal controls until we are able to hire additional employees, so that we may then introduce checks and balances on internal controls.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Internal Controls

Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting are or will be capable of preventing or detecting all errors or all fraud. Any control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements, due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns may occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk.

Table of Contents

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

During the most recently completed fiscal quarter, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None

-10-

PART III

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

The following information sets forth the name of our sole executive officer and director, his age as of October 31, ~~2008~~2009 and his present position.

Name	Age	Position Held with the Company
Micheal Nugent	4546	~~President,~~Chief ~~Secretary,~~Executive ~~CEO,~~Officer ~~CFO,~~and ~~Director~~Board Chairman
Sonny Nugent	23	Chief Financial Officer
Robert Smith	48	Corporate Secretary

Set forth below is a brief description of the background and business experience of our ~~sole~~ executive ~~officer~~officers and ~~director~~directors.

Micheal Nugent, ~~President~~Chairman and ~~CEO~~Chief Executive Officer.

Micheal Nugent, a resident of Australia, holds offices and active roles with several private companies in the U.S. and Australia, including as the Founder, Chairman/CEO of Roadships America Inc., a private Nevada company that is developing Short Sea Shipping systems. He is the Founder and President of Cyclone Magnetic Engines Inc., a private Nevada company that is developing engine technology. He is a director and CEO of Fire From Ice Films Inc., a private Nevada corporation. He is the CEO of Endeavour Logistics Pty Ltd, a private Australian company that consults with Australian Trucking companies. He is also the Chairman/CEO of Adbax Pty Ltd., a private Australian company that provides truckside advertising as an affiliate of Truckads. Mr. Nugent completed his discipline as a Diesel Fitter in 1983 with Cummins Diesel Sales and Service. Mr. Nugent is a member of the Australian Institute of Company Directors, The Marine Highways Cooperative, The Coastwise Coalition and The Advertising Federation of Australia.

15Sonny Nugent, Chief Financial Officer

~~Table~~Sonny Nugent, age 23 a resident of ~~Contents~~Australia, graduated from A B Paterson College and then completed his discipline as a construction carpenter. Sonny is currently a student at Bond University, Gold Coast Australia studying business and finance.

Robert Smith, Corporate Secretary

Mr. Smith is a Director and Corporate Secretary of Nugent Engine Technologies, Inc., a 10-12G Blank Check Company; the co-Managing Member of Enterprise Creations LLC, a joint venture, and; the Managing Member of RKS Capital LLC, a business development solution provider. Mr. Smith has 20 plus cumulative years of management experience; 16 years at executive-level management; 12 plus years [hands-on] building start-ups and emerging companies; 10 years experience as a business development consultant. He holds extensive experience and success in strategic planning and management and capital acquisition (equity and private debt). Mr. Smith is a “nuts and bolts” business development professional with proven success working with development, start-up, emerging and growth companies in a variety of industries; with added emphasis on capital acquisition strategies and business plan development.

Directors

Our bylaws authorize no less than one (1) and more than ten (10) directors. We currently have ~~one~~three ~~Director~~directors: Micheal Nugent, the Chairman, Sonny Nugent, the Chief Financial Officer, and Robert Smith, the Corporate Secretary.

Term of Office

Our Directors are appointed for a one-year term to hold office until the next annual general meeting of our shareholders or until removed from office in accordance with our bylaws. Our officers are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until removed by the board.

Family Relationships

Sonny Nugent, our Chief Financial Officer, is the son of Micheal Nugent, our Chief Executive Officer. There are no other family relationships between or among the directors, executive officers or persons nominated or chosen by us to become directors or executive officers.

-11-

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

To the best of our knowledge, during the past five years, none of the following occurred with respect to a present or former director, executive officer, or employee: (1) any bankruptcy petition filed by or against any business of which such person was a general partner or executive officer either at the time of the bankruptcy or within two years prior to that time; (2) any conviction in a criminal proceeding or being subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses); (3) being subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his or her involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; and (4) being found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or the Commodities Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated.

Audit Committee

We do not have a separately-designated standing audit committee. The entire Board of Directors performs the functions of an audit committee, but no written charter governs the actions of the Board when performing the functions of what would generally be performed by an audit committee. The Board approves the selection of our independent accountants and meets and

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our directors and executive officers and persons who beneficially own more than ten percent of a registered class of the Company’s equity securities to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and other equity securities of the Company. Officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial shareholders are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file. To the best of our knowledge based solely on a review of Forms 3, 4, and 5 (and any amendments thereof) received by us during or with respect to the year ended October 31, 2006, the following persons have failed to file, on a timely basis, the identified reports required by Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act during fiscal year ended October 31, ~~2008~~2009:

Name and principal position	Number of late reports	Transactions not timely reported	Known failures to file a required form
Micheal Nugent, Chief Executive Officer	0	0	0
Sonny Nugent, Chief Financial Officer	1	1	1
Robert Smith, Corporate Secretary	1	1	1

Table of Contents

Name and principal position	Number of late reports	Transactions not timely reported	Known failures to file a required form
Micheal Nugent, President	0	0	0
Bruce Brandt, Former President	0	0	0

Code of Ethics

As of October 31, ~~2008~~2009, we had not adopted a Code of Ethics for Financial Executives, which would include our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions.

-12-

Item 11. Executive Compensation

Summary Compensation Table

The table below summarizes all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to both to our officers and to our directors for all services rendered in all capacities to us for our fiscal years ended October 31, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2008.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
Name and principal position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Name	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Micheal Nugent, President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Director	2008 2007	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 0
Michael Nugent	2009	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Bruce Brandt, Former President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Director	2008 2007	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 0	0 0
	2008	-	-	-	-	-	-	-	-
Robert Smith	2009	-	-	$ 1,000	-	-	-	-	$ 1,000
Sonny Nugent	2009	-	-	$ 200	-	-	-	-	$ 200

17Mr. Michael Nugent is the Chief Executive Officer.

~~Table~~Mr. Robert ofSmith ~~Contents~~is the Corporate Secretary

Mr. Sonny Nugent is the Chief Financial Officer

Narrative Disclosure to the Summary Compensation Table

We have not entered into any employment agreement or consulting agreement with our executive officer. There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for executive officers.

Although we do not currently compensate our officer, we reserve the right to provide compensation at some time in the future. Our decision to compensate officers depends on the availability of our cash resources with respect to the need for cash to further our business purposes.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The table below summarizes all unexercised options, stock that has not vested, and equity incentive plan awards for each named executive officer as of October 31, ~~2008~~2009.

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END OPTION AWARDS STOCK AWARDS Name Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) Option Exercise Price ($) Option Expiration Date Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) Micheal Nugent - - - - - - - - - ~~Bruce~~Robert ~~Brandt~~Smith - - - - - - - - - Sonny Nugent - - - - - - - - -

Table of Contents

Stock Option Grants

We have not granted any stock options to the executive officers or directors since our inception.

-13-

Director Compensation

The table below summarizes all compensation awarded to, earned by, or paid to our director for all services rendered in all capacities to us for the period from inception (August 27, 2007) through October 31, ~~2008~~2009.

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
Name	Fees Earned or Paid in Cash ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Micheal Nugent	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Bruce Brandt	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Sonny Nugent	0	0	0	0	0	0	0
Robert Smith	0	0	0	0	0	0	0

Narrative Disclosure to the Director Compensation Table

We do not pay any compensation to our directors at this time. However, we reserve the right to compensate our directors in the future with cash, stock, options, or some combination of the above.

We have not reimbursed our directors for expenses incurred in connection with attending board meetings nor have we paid any directors fees or other cash compensation for services rendered as a director in the year ended October 31, ~~2008~~2009.

We have no formal plan for compensating our directors for their services in their capacity as directors. In the future we may grant options to our directors to purchase shares of common stock as determined by our Board of Directors or a compensation committee that may be established.

Stock Option Plans

We did not have a stock option plan as of October 31, ~~2008~~2009.

Table of Contents

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth certain information known to us with respect to the beneficial ownership of our Common Stock as of October 31, ~~2008~~2009, by (1) all persons who are beneficial owners of 5% or more of our voting securities, (2) each director, (3) each executive officer, and (4) all directors and executive officers as a group. The information regarding beneficial ownership of our common stock has been presented in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Under these rules, a person may be deemed to beneficially own any shares of capital stock as to which such person, directly or indirectly, has or shares voting power or investment power, and to beneficially own any shares of our capital stock as to which such person has the right to acquire voting or investment power within 60 days through the exercise of any stock option or other right. The percentage of beneficial ownership as to any person as of a particular date is calculated by dividing (a) (i) the number of shares beneficially owned by such person plus (ii) the number of shares as to which such person has the right to acquire voting or investment power within 60 days by (b) the total number of shares outstanding as of such date, plus any shares that such person has the right to acquire from us within 60 days. Including those shares in the tables does not, however, constitute an admission that the named stockholder is a direct or indirect beneficial owner of those shares. Unless otherwise indicated, each person or entity named in the table has sole voting power and investment power (or shares that power with that person’s spouse) with respect to all shares of capital stock listed as owned by that person or entity.

-14-

Except as otherwise indicated, all Shares are owned directly and the percentage shown is based on 3,000,000 Shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding as of October 31, 2008.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owners of Common Stock1	Title of Class	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership	% of Common Stock2
Micheal Nugent 10/75 Waterway Drive, Golden Coast Marine Project Coomera QLD Australia 4209	Common Stock	3,000,000	~~100~~71.4%
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS – TOTAL		3,000,000	100%
Robert Smith City Center, 525 North Tryon Street, Suite 1600,, Charlotte, NC, 28202	Common Stock	1,000,000	23.8%
Sonny Nugent 10/75 Waterway Drive, Golden Coast Marine Project Coomera QLD Australia 4209	Common Stock	200,000	4.8%
DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS – TOTAL		4,200,000	100%
5% SHAREHOLDERS
None	Common Stock	0	0%
Total of 5% shareholders		0	0%

Other than the shareholders listed above, we know of no other person who is the beneficial owner of more than five percent (5%) of our common stock.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

None of our directors or executive officers, nor any proposed nominee for election as a director, nor any person who beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, shares carrying more than 5% of the voting rights attached to all of our outstanding shares, nor any members of the immediate family (including spouse, parents, children, siblings, and in-laws) of any of the foregoing persons has any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction over the last two years or in any presently proposed transaction which, in either case, has or will materially affect us.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services

Below is the table of Audit Fees (amounts in US$) billed by our auditor in connection with the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements for the years ended:

Financial Statements for the Year Ended October 31	Audit Services	Audit Related Fees	Tax Fees	Other Fees
2009	$3,350	$0	$0	$0
2008	$6,375	$0	$0	$0
2007	$2,500	$0	$0	$0

20-15-

Table of Contents

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statements Schedules

Index to Financial Statements Required by Article 8 of Regulation S-X:

Audited Financial Statements:
F-1	Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
F-2	Consolidated Balance Sheets as of October 31, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2008;
F-3	Statements of Operations for the ~~year~~years ended October 31, 2009 and 2008, and the periods from inception to October 31, ~~2007, and from inception to October 31, 2008~~2009;
F-4	Statement of Stockholders’ Equity for period from inception to October 31, ~~2008~~2009;
F-5	Statements of Cash Flows for the ~~year~~years ended October 31, 2009 and 2008, and the periods from inception to October 31, ~~2007, and from inception to October 31, 2008~~2009;
F-6	Notes to Financial Statements

Exhibit Number	Description
Exhibit No.	Description
3.1	Articles of Incorporation, as amended (1)
3.2	Bylaws, as amended (1)
23.1	Consent of Moore & Associates, Chartered
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

1 Incorporated by reference to the Registration Statement on Form 10-SB12G filed on November 20, 2007.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

~~Roman~~Fire ~~Acquisition~~From ~~Corp~~Ice, Inc.

By:	/s/ Micheal Nugent
	Micheal Nugent President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Director
	Micheal Nugent President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer, and Director
	February 12, 2009
	March 15, 2010

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

By:	/s ~~Micheal~~Sonny Nugent
	Micheal Nugent President, Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer and Director
	Sonny Nugent Chief Financial Officer
	February 12, 2009
	March 15, 2010

22-16-

Table of Contents

MOORE & ASSOCIATES, CHARTERED

ACCOUNTANTS AND ADVISORS

PCAOB REGISTERED

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors

~~Roman~~Fire ~~Acquisition~~From ~~Corp~~Ice, Inc.

(Formerly Roman Acquisition Corp.)

(A Development Stage Company)

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of ~~Roman~~Fire ~~Acquisition~~From ~~Corp~~Ice, Inc. (Aformerly Roman ~~Development~~Acquisition ~~Stage~~Corp.) (a ~~Company~~exploration stage company) as of October 31, 2009 ~~2008~~ and ~~2007,~~2008 and the related statements of operations, ~~stockholders’~~changes in shareholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the ~~year~~ ~~ended~~years ~~October~~then ~~31, 2008 and for the period inception August 27, 2007 through October 31, 2007 and since inception on August 27, 2007 through October 31, 2008~~ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’'s management. ~~Our~~ Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We ~~conduct~~conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company ~~Accounting~~ Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the ~~audits~~audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the ~~financial~~ financial statements are free of material misstatement. An The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over ~~includes~~financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements~~. An~~, ~~audit also includes~~ assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our ~~audits~~audit ~~provide~~provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ~~Roman~~Fire ~~Acquisition~~From ~~Corp~~Ice, Inc. ~~(A Development Stage Company)~~ as of October 31, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2008, and the ~~related statements~~results of its operations, ~~stockholders’~~changes in shareholders' equity (deficit) and cash flows for the ~~year ended October 31, 2008 and for the~~ period ~~inception~~described ~~August~~above ~~27, 2007 through October 31, 2007 and since inception on August 27, 2007 through October 31, 2008,~~ in ~~conformity~~ conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 23 to the ~~financial~~ financial statements, the Company ~~does~~has ~~not~~suffered ~~have~~a ~~sufficient~~net ~~capital~~loss ~~resources~~from operations and ~~will~~ ~~need~~has ~~to establish~~ a ~~consistent~~net capital ~~source of revenue~~deficiency, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’'s plans ~~concerning~~regarding ~~these~~those matters ~~are~~ also are described in Note 23. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ ~~Moore~~ M&K ~~Associates~~CPAS, ~~Chartered~~PLLC

~~Moore & Associates, Chartered~~www.mkacpas.com

~~Las Vegas~~Houston, ~~Nevada~~ Texas

~~February 11,~~March ~~2009~~13, 2010

6490 West Desert Inn Rd, Las Vegas, NV 89146 (702) 253-7499 Fax (702) 253-7501

F-1

~~Table~~FIRE FROM ofICE, ~~Contents~~INC.

~~ROMAN~~(Formerly Roman ~~ACQUISITION~~Acquisition ~~CORPORATION~~Corp.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Balance Sheets

	October 31, 2008			October 31, 2007
		October 31, 2009				October 31, 2008
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and equivalents		$	-			$	-
Cash	$	-		$	45
TOTAL ASSETS		$	-			$	-
Prepaid expenses		-			2,500
LIABILITIES
Total Current Assets		-			2,545
Accounts payable -related party		$	-			$	15,010
TOTAL ASSETS	$	-		$	2,545
TOTAL LIABILITIES			-				15,010
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Preferred stock, par value $0.001, authorized 10 million shares, none issued or outstanding			-				-
Accounts payable-related party	$	15,010		$	-
Common stock: $0.001 par value; 90,000,000 shares authorized; 4,200,000 and 3,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at October 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively			4,200				3,000
Total Current Liabilities		15,010			-
Additional paid-in capital			29,619				485
STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Deficit accumulated during the development phase			(33,819	)			(18,495	)
Preferred stock: $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding		-			-
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)			-				(15,010	)
Common stock: $0.001 par value; 90,000,000 shares authorized; 3,000,000 shares issued and outstanding		3,000			3,000
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)		$	-			$	-
Additional paid-in capital		-			-
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(18,010)			(455)
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)		(15,010)			2,545
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)	$	-		$	2,545

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-2

~~Table~~ FIRE ofFROM ~~Contents~~ICE, INC.

(Formerly Roman Acquisition Corp.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Operations

	For the Year Ended October 31, 2008			From Inception on August 27, 2007 Through October 31, 2007			From Inception on August 27, 2007 Through October 31, 2008
		Year Ended October 31, 2009				Year Ended October 31, 2009			From Inception (August 27, 2007) to October 31, 2009
REVENUES	$	-		$	-		$	-
Revenues		$	-			$	-		$	-
COST OF REVENUES		-			-			-
OPERATING EXPENSES
GROSS MARGIN		-			-			-
General and administrative expenses			14,167				17,555			32,177
OPERATING EXPENSES
Interest expense - related party			1,157				485			1,642
General and administrative		17,555			455			18,010
Net operating loss			(15,324	)			(18,040	)		(33,819	)
Total Operating Expenses		17,555			455			18,010
NET LOSS		$	(15,324	)		$	(18,040	)	$	(33,819	)
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS		(17,555)			(455)			(18,010)
Net loss per share, basic and fully diluted		$	-			$	-
INCOME TAX EXPENSE		-			-			-
Weighted average number of shares outstanding			3,450,411				3,000,000
NET LOSS	$	(17,555)		$	(455)		$	(18,010)
BASIC LOSS PER SHARE	$	(0.01)		$	(0.00)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING		3,000,000			3,000,000

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-3

~~Table~~FIRE FROM ofICE, ~~Contents~~INC.

~~ROMAN~~(Formerly Roman ~~ACQUISITION~~Acquisition ~~CORPORATION~~Corp.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of ~~Stockholders~~Shareholders' Equity (Deficit)

	~~Common Stock~~		Common Stock			~~Additional Paid-In~~		~~Deficit Accumulated During the Development~~
	Shares			Amount		Capital		Stage			Total
	Date		Shares			Amount			Additional Paid In Capital				Deficit Accumulated During the Development Stage			Total Shareholders' Deficit
Balance, August 27, 2007		-		$	-	$	-	$	-		$	-
Balances, August 27, 2007				-		$	-		$	-			$	-		$	-
Shares issued for cash at $0.001 per share		3,000,000			3,000		-		-			3,000
Shares issued for cash				3,000,000			3,000										3,000
Net loss for the period ended October 31, 2007		-			-		-		(455)			(455)
Net loss														(455	)		(455	)
Balance, October 31, 2007		3,000,000			3,000		-		(455)			2,545
Balances, October 31, 2007				3,000,000		$	3,000		$	-			$	(455	)	$	2,545
Net loss for the year ended October 31, 2008		-			-		-		(17,555)			(17,555)
Imputed interest on shareholder loan										485							485
Balance, October 31, 2008		3,000,000		$	3,000	$	-	$	(18,010)		$	(15,010)
Net loss														(18,040	)		(18,040	)
Balances, October 31, 2008				3,000,000			3,000			485				(18,495	)		(15,010	)
Imputed interest on shareholder loan										1,157							1,157
Shares issued for services	06/12/09			1,200,000			1,200										1,200
Forgiveness of related party debt										24,627							24,627
Expenses paid by a related party										3,350							3,350
Net loss														(15,324	)		(15,324	)
Balances, October 31, 2009				4,200,000		$	4,200		$	29,619			$	(33,819	)	$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-4

~~Table~~ FIRE ofFROM ~~Contents~~ICE, INC.

~~ROMAN~~(Formerly Roman ~~ACQUISITION~~Acquisition ~~CORPORATION~~Corp.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Statements of Cash Flows

	For the Year Ended October 31, 2008			From Inception on August 27, 2007 Through October 31, 2007			From Inception on August 27, 2007 Through October 31, 2008
	Year Ended October 31, 2009				Year Ended October 31, 2008				From Inception (August 27, 2007) to October 31, 2009
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net loss	$	(1715,~~555)~~324	)	$	~~(455)~~$	(18,040	$)	~~(18,010)~~	$	(33,334	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net loss with cash used in operations:
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Imputed interest on related-party payable		1,157				485				1,642
(Increase) decrease in prepaid expense		2,500			(2,500)			-
Stock based compensation		1,200				-				1,200
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable-related party		15,010			-			15,010
Changes in:
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities		(45)			(2,955)			(3,000)
Prepaid expenses		-				2,500
INVESTING ACTIVITIES		-			-			-
Accounts payable, related party		-				15,010				-
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net cash used in operating activities		(12,967	)			(45	)			(30,977	)
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		-			3,000			3,000
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		-			3,000			3,000
		-				-				-
NET DECREASE IN CASH		(45)			45			-
Net cash provided by / used in investing activities		-				-				-
CASH AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		45			-			-
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
CASH AT END OF PERIOD	$	-		$	45		$	-
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock										3,000
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Expensese paid by shareholder		12,967				-				27,977
CASH PAID FOR:
Net cash provided by financing activities		12,967				-				30,977
Interest	$	-		$	-		$	-
NET INCREASE / (DECREASE) IN CASH		-				(45	)			-
Income Taxes	$	-		$	-		$	-
Cash at beginning of period		-				45				-
Cash at end of period	$	-			$	-			$	-
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
Cash paid for interest	$	-			$	-			$	-
Cash paid for income taxes	$	-			$	-			$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

F-5

~~Table of~~ ~~Contents~~FIRE FROM ICE, INC.

~~ROMAN~~(Formerly Roman ~~ACQUISITION~~Acquisition ~~CORPORATION~~Corp.)

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

October 31, ~~2008~~2009 and ~~2007~~2008

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF ORGANIZATION

a. Business and Organization

The company was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on August 27, 2007 with no principal business activity other than seeking a merger or acquisition of an existing operating company. On July 15, 2009, we changed the name of the Company from Roman Acquisition Corp. to Fire From Ice, Inc.

~~b. Depreciation~~NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

~~The~~Basis ~~cost~~ of ~~the property and equipment will be depreciated over the estimated useful life~~ ~~of 5 to 7 years. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method when assets are placed in service.~~Presentation

cThe Company follows accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. ~~Accounting~~ In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal ~~Method~~recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and the results of operations for the periods presented have been reflected herein.

~~The Company's~~Use ~~financial statements are prepared using the accrual method~~ of ~~accounting. The Company has elected an October 31 year-end.~~Estimates

~~d. Cash~~The preparation of financial statements, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, requires management to make estimates and ~~Cash~~assumptions ~~Equivalents~~that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

~~For~~Cash ~~the~~and ~~purpose~~Cash ~~of the statements of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be a cash equivalents.~~Equivalents

eThe Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments and other short-term investments with a maturity of three months or less, when purchased, to be cash equivalents. ~~Estimates~~ There are no cash equivalents at October 31, 2009 and 2008.

~~The~~Revenue preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.Recognition

~~f. Revenue~~The ~~Recognition~~Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collection is reasonable assured.

~~The Company~~Basic ~~recognizes revenue when products are fully delivered or services have~~and ~~provided~~Diluted ~~and~~Net ~~collection~~Loss isPer ~~reasonable assured.~~Share

gThe Company follows ASC No. 260, “Earnings Per Share” (ASC No. 260) that requires the reporting of both basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share. ~~Organization~~Basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net ~~Costs~~income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. The calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. In accordance with ASC No. 260, any anti-dilutive effects on net earnings (loss) per share are excluded. For the periods ended October 31, 2009 and 2008, there were no common stock equivalents.

~~The~~For the ~~Company~~year ~~has~~ended ~~expensed~~October ~~the~~31, ~~costs~~2009 ofand ~~its~~2008, ~~incorporation~~there were no potentially dilutive securities outstanding.

~~h. Advertising~~Fair Value of Financial Instruments

~~The~~Pursuant ~~Company~~to ~~follows~~ASC No. 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures”, the ~~policy~~Company ofis required ~~charging~~to estimate the ~~costs~~fair value of ~~advertising~~all tofinancial ~~expense~~instruments asincluded on its ~~incurred~~balance sheet as of December 31, 2009. The Company’s ~~incurred~~financial noinstruments consist ~~advertising~~of ~~expense~~cash. The ~~during~~Company considers the ~~years~~carrying ~~ended~~value of such ~~October~~amounts ~~31,~~in ~~2008~~the ~~and~~financial ~~2007~~statements to approximate their fair value due to the short-term nature of these financial instruments.

F-6

~~Table of Contents~~Income Taxes

~~ROMAN~~The ~~ACQUISITION~~Company ~~CORPORATION~~recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates and laws that are expected to be in effect when the differences are expected to be recovered. The Company provides a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets for which it does not consider realization of such assets likely.

(ARecent ~~Development~~Accounting ~~Stage Company)~~Pronouncements

~~Notes~~In toJune 2009, the Financial ~~Statements~~Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASC Statement No. 105. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (ASC 105). ASC 105 has become the single source authoritative nongovernmental U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), superseding existing FASB, American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Emerging Issues Task Force, and related accounting literature. ASC 105 reorganized the thousands of GAAP pronouncements into roughly 90 accounting topics and displays them using a consistent structure. Also included is relevant SEC guidance organized using the same topical structure in separate sections. The Company adopted ASC 105 on July 1, 2009. The adoption of ASC 105 did not have an impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

~~October~~On 31April 1, ~~2008~~2009, the Company adopted ASC 825-10-65, Financial Instruments – Overall – Transition and ~~2007~~Open Effective Date Information (ASC 825-10-65). ASC 825-10-65 amends ASC 825-10 to require disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in interim financial statements as well as in annual financial statements and also amends ASC 270-10 to require those disclosures in all interim financial statements. The adoption of ASC 825-10-65 did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

~~NOTE~~ On April 1, ~~– NATURE~~2009, OFthe ~~ORGANIZATION~~Company adopted ASC 855, Subsequent Events (~~Continued~~ASC 855). ASC 855 establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. It requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date – that is, whether that date represents the date the financial statements were issued or were available to be issued. This disclosure should alert all users of financial statements that an entity has not evaluated subsequent events after that date in the set of financial statements being presented. The adoption of ASC 855 did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

iOn July 1, 2009, the Company adopted ASU No. ~~Concentrations~~ 2009-05, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820) (ASU 2009-05). ASU 2009-05 provided amendments to ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures – Overall, for the fair value measurement of ~~Risk~~liabilities. ASU 2009-05 provides clarification that in circumstances in which a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability is not available, a reporting entity is required to measure fair value using certain techniques. ASU 2009-05 also clarifies that when estimating the fair value of a liability, a reporting entity is not required to include a separate input or adjustment to other inputs relating to the existence of a restriction that prevents the transfer of a liability. ASU 2009-05 also clarifies that both a quoted price in an active market for the identical liability at the measurement date and the quoted price for the identical liability when traded as an asset in an active market when no adjustments to the quoted price of the asset are required are Level 1 fair value measurements. The adoption of ASU 2009-05 did not have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial condition.

~~The~~In ~~Company's~~October ~~bank~~2009, ~~accounts~~the ~~are~~FASB ~~deposited~~issued ASU 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements, (amendments to ASC 605, Revenue Recognition) (ASU 2009-13). ASU 2009-13 requires entities to allocate revenue in ~~insured~~an arrangement ~~institutions~~using estimated selling prices of the delivered goods and services based on a selling price hierarchy. The ~~funds~~amendments ~~are~~eliminate the residual method ~~insured~~of uprevenue allocation and require revenue to ~~$100,000~~be allocated using the relative selling price method. At ASU ~~October~~2009-13 31should be applied on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified in fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, ~~2008~~2010, ~~the~~with ~~Company's~~early ~~bank~~adoption permitted. ~~deposits~~The ~~did~~Company does not ~~exceed~~expect adoption of ASU 2009-13 to have a material impact on the ~~insured~~Company’s ~~amounts~~results of operations or financial condition.

j. Basic Loss Per Share

The computation of basic loss per share of common stock is based on the weighted average number of shares outstand during the period. The Company had no common stock equivalents as of October 31, 2008 and 2007.

	For the Year Ended October 31, 2008		From Inception on August 27, 2007 Through October 31, 2007
Loss (numerator)	$	(17,555)	$	(455)
Shares (denominator)		3,000,000		3,000,000
Per share amount	$	(0.01)	$	(0.00)

k. Income Taxes

Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date effected.

The income tax provision differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying the U.S. federal and state income tax rates of 39% to pretax income from continuing operations for the periods ended October 31, 2008 and 2007 due to the following:

	2008		2007
Book loss	$	6,846	$	177
Valuation allowance		(6,846)		(177)
	$	-	$	-

F-7

~~Table~~NOTE of3 ~~Contents~~- GOING CONCERN

ROMAN ACQUISITION CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

October 31, 2008 and 2007

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF ORGANIZATION (Continued)

k. Income Taxes (continued)

At October 31, 2008, the Company had net operating loss forwards of approximately $18,010 that may be offset against future taxable income through 2028. No tax benefit has been reported in the October 31, 2008 financial statements since the potential tax benefit is offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount.

Due to the change in ownership provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, net operating carry forwards for Federal Income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations. Should a change in ownership occur, net operating loss carry forwards may be limited as to use in future years.

NOTE 2 - GOING CONCERN

The Company's financial statements are prepared using generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has had no revenues and has generated from operations.

In order to continue as a going concern and achieve a profitable level of operations, the Company will need, among other things, additional capital resources and developing a consistent source of revenues. Management's plans include seeking a merger with an existing operating company.

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to successfully accomplish the plan described in the preceding paragraph and eventually attain profitable operations. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 34 – ~~RECENTLY~~COMMON ~~ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS~~STOCK

InAs of ~~June 2008,~~October ~~the FASB issued FASB Staff Position EITF 03-6-1~~31, ~~Determining~~2007 ~~Whether~~we ~~Instruments Granted~~had in3 ~~Share-Based~~million ~~Payment~~shares ~~Transactions~~of ~~Are~~common ~~Participating~~stock ~~Securities, (“FSP~~outstanding ~~EITF~~which ~~03-6-1”). FSP EITF 03-6-1 addresses whether instruments granted in~~were ~~share-based~~purchased ~~payment~~by ~~transactions~~our ~~are~~Chief ~~participating~~Executive ~~securities~~Officer ~~prior to vesting,~~ and ~~therefore~~are ~~need~~considered ~~to be included in the computation of earnings per share under~~founders’ ~~the two-class method as described in FASB Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No~~shares. ~~128,~~ The ~~“Earnings~~shares ~~per~~were ~~Share.”~~purchased ~~FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective~~ for ~~financial~~ ~~statements issued for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15~~$3,000 ~~2008~~(their ~~and earlier adoption is prohibited. We are not required~~par ~~to adopt FSP EITF 03-6-1; neither do we believe that FSP EITF 03-6-1 would have material effect on our consolidated financial position and results of operations if adopted~~values).

~~In May~~During ~~2008,~~ the ~~Financial~~twelve ~~Accounting~~months ~~Standards~~ended ~~Board~~October ~~(“FASB”)~~31, ~~issued SFAS No. 163~~2008, ~~“Accounting~~ ~~for~~we ~~Financial Guarantee~~issued ~~Insurance~~no ~~Contracts-and interpretation of FASB Statement No.~~additional ~~60”~~shares. ~~SFAS No. 163 clarifies how Statement 60 applies to financial guarantee insurance~~

On June 16, 2009, we issued 1 million common shares to our Corporate Secretary for services and recognized $1,000 of expense, based on the price of the most recent sale of Company stock.

On June 16, 2009, we also issued 200,000 shares to our Chief Financial Officer and recognized $200 of expense, based on the price of the most recent sale of Company stock.

We have no potentially dilutive financial instruments outstanding.

NOTE 5 – INCOME TAXES

Deferred income taxes are determined using the liability method for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and income tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities. Deferred income taxes are measured based on the tax rates expected to be in effect when the temporary differences are included in the Company’s tax return. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on anticipated future tax consequences attributable to differences between financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases.

	2009			2008
Book loss	$	13,111		$	6,745
Valuation allowance		(13,111	)		(6,745	)
	$	-		$	-

At October 31, 2009, the Company had net operating loss forwards of approximately $33,600 that may be offset against future taxable income through 2029. No tax benefit has been reported in the October 31, 2009 financial statements since the potential tax benefit is offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount.

NOTE 6 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

For the period from inception (August 27, 2007) to October 31, 2008, our operations were funded by non-interest-bearing loans in the amount of $15,010 from our sole shareholder, Micheal Nugent. During that period, we imputed interest in the amount of $485 and credited Additional Paid in Capital.

Additionally, for the period from November 1, 2008 to October 31, 2009, additional loans were made by our Corporate Secretary, Robert Smith, in the amount of $9,617. For the year ended October 31, 2009, we imputed $1,157 of interest and credited Additional Paid in Capital.

During the year ended October 31, 2009, both of these loans were forgiven and the balances owed were treated as contributed capital.

NOTE 7 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date these financial statements were issued and determined there were none.

F-8

~~Table of Contents~~SIGNATURES

~~ROMAN~~In ~~ACQUISITION~~accordance ~~CORPORATION~~with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

(A Development Stage Company)

	Fire From Ice, Inc.

Date: March 15, 2010	By: /s/ Michael Nugent
	Michael Nugent
	Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

~~Notes~~In accordance towith the Exchange Act , this report has been duly signed by the ~~Financial~~following ~~Statements~~persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

October 31, 2008 and 2007

/s/Sonny Nugent
Sonny Nugent	Date: March 15, 2010
Chief Financial Officer

/s/ Robert Smith
Robert Smith	Date: March 15, 2010
Corporate Secretary

~~NOTE 3 – RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (CONTINUED~~-17-

contracts, including the recognition and measurement of premium revenue and claims liabilities. This statement also requires expanded disclosures about financial guarantee insurance contracts. SFAS No. 163 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those years. SFAS No. 163 has no effect on the Company’s financial position, statements of operations, or cash flows at this time.

In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles”. SFAS No. 162 sets forth the level of authority to a given accounting pronouncement or document by category. Where there might be conflicting guidance between two categories, the more authoritative category will prevail. SFAS No. 162 will become effective 60 days after the SEC approves the PCAOB’s amendments to AU Section 411 of the AICPA Professional Standards. SFAS No. 162 has no effect on the Company’s financial position, statements of operations, or cash flows at this time.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—an amendment of ARB No. 51. This statement amends ARB 51 to

F-9

Table of Contents

ROMAN ACQUISITION CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

October 31, 2008 and 2007

NOTE 3 – RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (CONTINUED)

establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an

F-10

Table of Contents

ROMAN ACQUISITION CORPORATION

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Financial Statements

October 31, 2008 and 2007

NOTE 3 – RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (CONTINUED)

F-11

Filing Compare · Fire From Ice, Inc.