UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K



☒		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024
OR
☐		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 001-34852

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)



British Columbia		N/A
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

P.O. Box 271049
Littleton, Colorado		80127
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

(720) 278-2460

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code)

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT: None

SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:

Common Shares, No Par Value

Title of Each Class

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large Accelerated Filer ☐	Accelerated Filer ☐	Non-Accelerated Filer ☒	Smaller Reporting Company ☒	Emerging Growth Company ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised ﬁnancial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262 (b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No☒

As of June 30, ~~2023~~2024, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting common shares held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $3134,~~100~~000,000 based upon the closing sale price of the common shares as reported by the OTCQB Venture Marketplace.

The number of the registrant’s common shares outstanding as of March 1517, ~~2024~~2025 was ~~511~~516,~~111~~134,~~557~~712.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PRELIMINARY NOTES		2
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS		2
GLOSSARY OF TERMS		4

PART I		7

ITEM 1.	BUSINESS	7
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	14
ITEM 1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS	29
ITEM 1C.	CYBERSECURITY	29
ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES	30
ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	40
ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	40

PART II		4041

ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	4041
ITEM 6.	[RESERVED]	4647
ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	4647
ITEM 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	5152
ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	5152
ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	6874
ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	6874
ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION	6975
ITEM 9C.	DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS	6975

PART III		6975

ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	6975
ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	7683
ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	8088
ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS; AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	8290
ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES	8491

PART IV		8592

ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	8592
ITEM 16.	FORM 10-K SUMMARY	8592

SIGNATURES		8895

Table of Contents

PRELIMINARY NOTES

As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”), references to “Rare Element,” the “Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us” mean Rare Element Resources Ltd., our predecessors, and consolidated subsidiaries, or any one or more of them, as the context requires.

Rare Element is focused on advancing our Bear Lodge rare earth elements project (the “Bear Lodge REE Project”), including demonstrating the technical and economic feasibility of our proprietary rare earth elements processing and separation technology through the construction and operation of a demonstration-scale processing and separation plant (the “Demonstration Plant”),. ~~while~~The ~~postponing~~Bear ~~further~~Lodge ~~exploration~~REE ofProject includes the mineral deposit and the planned processing and separation commercial plant. The Company previously explored its Sundance gold project mineralization, which exploration has been postponed since 2016 (the “Sundance Gold Project”,). ~~together~~Both ~~with~~ the Bear Lodge REE Project mineral deposit and the ~~“Projects”).~~Sundance ~~Both~~Gold ~~Projects~~Project are located primarily on the Bear Lodge property, near the town of Sundance in the state of Wyoming (the “Bear Lodge Property”). See “Part I, Item 1. Business.”

Financial information in this Annual Report is presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United States (“U.S.”) and, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars (“$” or “US$”).

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and “forward-looking information” within the meaning of Canadian securities laws (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). Any statements that express or involve discussions with respect to business prospects, predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, intentions, projections, objectives, strategies, assumptions, future events, performance or exploration and development efforts using words or phrases (including negative and grammatical variations) such as, but not limited to, “expects,” “anticipates,” “plans,” “estimates,” “intends,” “forecasts,” “likely,” “projects,” “believes,” “seeks,” or stating that certain actions, events or results “may,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved, are not statements of historical fact and may be forward-looking statements. Although we believe that our plans, intentions, and expectations reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot be certain that these plans, intentions, and expectations will be achieved. Actual results, performance or achievements could differ materially from those contemplated, expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report. Forward-looking statements in this Annual Report include, but are not limited to, statements regarding the following:

●

our business, prospects, and overall strategy;

● ~~planned~~progress orin ~~estimated~~the ~~expenses~~development ~~and~~of ~~capital~~our ~~expenditures, including the~~ Demonstration Plant’s ~~expected costs of construction, operation, decommissioning,~~ and the ~~sources~~timing of ~~funds~~that ~~to pay for such costs~~progress;

● ~~availability~~planned ofor ~~liquidity~~estimated expenses and capital ~~resources~~expenditures, including the Demonstration Plant’s expected costs of commissioning, operation, decommissioning, and the sources of funds to pay for such costs;

● ~~progress~~our inability ~~the~~to ~~development~~successfully ofmanage ~~our~~contractors ~~Demonstration~~that ~~Plant,~~may ~~the~~be ~~timing~~under ofcontract ~~that~~with ~~progress,~~another ~~and~~consortium ~~prospects~~member for ~~completing~~the ~~construction~~Demonstration Plant project, and ~~operating~~the risk of contractor liens on the Demonstration Plant due to contractor payment disputes we do not control;

●

availability of funds and capital resources;

●

our Demonstration Plant team’s ability to achieve the full amount of funding support from the Department of Energy (“DoE”) through the remainder of the Demonstration Plant project;

● our Demonstration Plant team’s ability to secure additional ~~DoE~~ funding, (in addition to the previously awarded funding,) ~~on a cost-share basis~~ relating to the Demonstration Plant project or any further initiatives or advancements that may be undertaken relating to the Demonstration Plant;

● our ability to receive the ~~full~~remaining ~~amount~~uncollected offunds ~~funding~~ in connection with the Wyoming Energy Authority (the “WEA”) grant for the Demonstration Plant;

● our ability to ~~complete and~~ operate the Demonstration Plant, including in a manner to meet project objectives within the approved budget and ~~within the~~ estimated timeline ~~for operating the Demonstration Plant~~;

● our ability to progress the Demonstration Plant through the remaining DoE go/no-go decision point;

● the source, quality, costs, and timing of materials, equipment, supplies and resources, including human resources, for the construction, operation, and decommissioning of the Demonstration Plant;

● the plans for our Projects or other interests, operations, or rights;

● plans and strategies during and following the completion of operations of the Demonstration Plant, including the

Table of Contents

~~potential~~● ~~for~~our ~~further~~estimates ~~operation~~regarding the source, quality, costs, and timing of materials, equipment, supplies and resources, including human resources, for the ~~Demonstration~~commissioning, ~~Plant~~operation, toand ~~meet~~decommissioning ~~additional~~of ~~objectives~~the Demonstration Plant;

●

plans for our projects or other interests, operations, or rights;

●

plans and strategies during and following the completion of operations of the Demonstration Plant, including the potential for further operation of the Demonstration Plant to meet additional objectives;

●

plans and strategies relating to the advancement of the Bear Lodge REE Project;

● our ~~ability~~plans and strategies to secure further funding for our longer-term business plans, including the advancement of the Bear Lodge REE Project through permitting and licensing, and, if feasible, ultimate construction and operations of a commercial mine and plant for processing and separation; ~~and~~of rare earth elements;

● ~~government~~the ~~regulations,~~timing ~~including~~of ~~our~~an ~~ability~~amendment to ~~obtain,~~the ~~and~~Cost ~~the~~Share ~~timing~~Agreement ~~of,~~(as ~~necessary~~defined ~~governmental~~below) ~~permits~~between the Company and ~~approvals~~General ~~for~~Atomics, ~~our~~whose ~~business~~affiliate ~~and~~is ~~Projects.~~the Company’s majority shareholder; and

●

our success in obtaining and the timing for receipts of, necessary governmental permits and approvals for our business and projects.

Forward-looking statements are based on our current expectations and assumptions that are subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual events or results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, risks associated with:

●

our majority shareholder’s significant influence on, or ability to control the outcome of, certain of our major corporate decisions, including our business strategies and financing options to meet our capital needs;

●

our ability to protect our intellectual property rights;

●

the ability of our Demonstration Plant to successfully operate and produce information that would support a decision by the Company to proceed with a potential commercial-scale production facility;

● the uncertain nature of demand for, and supply of rare earths, and their effect on prices for rare earth products;

●

technological advancements, substitutes, and the establishment of new uses and markets for rare earth products;

● ~~risks related to~~ the development of new, lower cost sources of supply ~~that~~of ~~could~~rare ~~reduce~~earth ~~or eliminate the market for REEs~~products;

● development ~~risks~~, construction and operational hazards, ~~and~~as well as regulatory approvals;

●

our reliance on the skill and expertise of third-party service providers;

● the ability of third-party service providers to meet their contractual obligations, including ~~those~~as ~~caused~~a byresult of supply chain disruptions and the effects those disruptions could have on our timelines and costs;

● government regulations and changes in legislation and regulations relating to the mining and rare earth industries, including environmental laws and regulations that impose material compliance costs and liabilities;

● difficulty in obtaining necessary governmental permits, licenses, and approvals for our Bear Lodge REE Project~~, and other projects~~;

●

governmental interventions in the mining and rare earth industries, including increases in barriers to domestic production and international trade;

● ~~uncertainties~~the ~~regarding~~impact ~~our~~of ~~ability~~potential tonew ~~maintain~~and/or ~~sufficient~~increased ~~liquidity~~tariffs and ~~attract~~other ~~sufficient~~trade ~~capital~~restrictions ~~resources~~on tothe ~~implement~~global ~~our~~trade ~~Projects and strategies~~industry;

●

uncertainties regarding our ability to maintain sufficient liquidity and attract sufficient capital resources to implement our projects and strategies;

●

our ability to attract and retain key personnel;

● the impact of inflation ~~affecting~~on our business, including the costs of and our ability to complete the Demonstration Plant ~~construction~~commissioning, operations and decommissioning, and the Bear Lodge REE Project~~, and other projects~~;

● the impact of external financial sector factors including the security of our bank and investment account deposits;

● ~~risks and~~ uncertainties inherent in estimates of future operating results;

●

changes in competitive factors, including the development or expansion of other projects that are competitive with ours;

●

China’s dominance of the rare earth supply chain and its ability to significantly impact market supply, demand and prices;

●

our ability to complete financings and other transactions;

● ~~risks related to~~ pandemics, epidemics or other disease outbreaks on supply chains and the resulting disease containment measures implemented by various governments;

● ~~risks relating to~~ the availability and costs of goods and services we need to achieve our plans and goals resulting from military conflicts or wars such as in Russia/Ukraine and the Middle East;

● information technology system and/or data disruptions, damage, theft or failures, or cyber-attacks;

● risks and uncertainties associated with litigation matters and opposition to our plans and operations by third parties;

● share price volatility;

Table of Contents

● ~~whether~~information wetechnology ~~deregister~~system ~~our common shares under the Exchange Act~~ and/or ~~list~~data ~~our~~disruptions, ~~common~~damage, ~~shares~~theft, onfailures, aor ~~securities exchange~~cyber-attacks;

● ~~the~~uncertainties ~~impact~~associated ofwith ~~foreign~~litigation matters and ~~domestic~~opposition ~~government~~to ~~actions~~our ~~impacting~~plans ~~the pricing for, or supply of, rare earth products, including changes in the actual or perceived supply~~ and ~~demand~~operations ~~for~~by ~~rare~~third ~~earths due to foreign government export controls~~parties;

●

share price volatility;

●

whether we deregister our common shares under the Exchange Act and/or list our common shares on a securities exchange other than the QTCQB Venture Marketplace;

●

foreign and domestic government actions impacting the pricing for, or supply of, rare earth products, including changes in the actual or perceived supply and demand for rare earths due to foreign government export controls;

●

the OTCQB Venture Marketplace standards and the “penny stock” rules and the impact on trading volume and liquidity due to our trading on the OTCQB Venture Marketplace;

●

the consequences of Synchron, the Company’s majority shareholder, discontinuing its support for the Company;

●

risk factors discussed in this Annual Report; and

●

other factors, many of which are beyond our control.

This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect our forward-looking statements. Some of the important risks and uncertainties that could affect forward-looking statements are described further under the section headings “Item 1. Business,”, “Item 1A. Risk Factors”, and elsewhere in this Annual Report. Although we have attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results, performance, or achievements to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, there may be other factors that could cause results, performance, or achievements not to be as anticipated, estimated, intended, or ~~intended~~expected. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results, performance, or achievements may vary, possibly materially, from those anticipated, estimated, intended, or expected. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made. Except as required by law, we disclaim any obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of such statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events. We qualify all of the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report by the foregoing cautionary statements. We advise you to carefully review the reports and documents we file from time to time with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities. The reports and documents filed by us with the SEC are available at www.sec.gov and with the Canadian securities regulatory authorities under the Company’s profile at www.sedarplus.ca.

GLOSSARY OF TERMS

Conversion Factors and Abbreviations

All units in this Annual Report are stated in metric measurements ~~unless~~and ~~otherwise~~their ~~noted~~imperial measurement equivalents. For ease of reference, the following conversion factors are provided:


To Convert Imperial Measurement Units	To Metric Measurement Units	Multiply by
Acres	Hectares	0.4047
Feet	Meters	0.3048
Miles	Kilometers	1.6093
Tons (short)	Tonnes	0.9071

Definitions

bastnasite – a mixed lanthanide fluoro-carbonate mineral (LaCO₃F) that currently provides the bulk of the world’s supply of the LREEs. Bastnasite and monazite are the two most common sources of cerium and other REEs. Bastnasite is found in carbonatites, carbonate rocks of igneous derivation.

beneficiation – operations that concentrate and separate mineral values in ore from waste material, and typically include, but are not limited to, crushing, grinding, washing, filtration, and leaching.

cerium (“Ce”) – a soft, silvery, ductile metallic element that easily oxidizes in air. Ce is the most abundant of the REEs and is found in a number of minerals, including monazite and bastnasite. Ce has two relatively stable oxidation states ~~(Ce3+ and Ce4+), enabling both the storage of oxygen and its widespread use in catalytic converters. Ce is also widely used in glass polishing.~~

Table of Contents

(Ce3+ and Ce4+), enabling both the storage of oxygen and its widespread use in catalytic converters. Ce is also widely used in glass polishing.

concentrate – a mineral beneficiation product that generally describes the material that is produced after crushing and grinding ore, effecting significant separation of gangue (waste) minerals from the desired metal and/or metallic minerals, and discarding the waste minerals. The resulting “concentrate” of minerals typically has an order of magnitude higher content of minerals than does the beginning ore material.

CREE – critical rare earth elements – Nd, EuPr, Dy, Tb and YTb were identified by the DoE as “critical” in its ~~2011~~2023 Critical Materials ~~Strategy Report~~Assessment. CREEs are those projected by the DoE to have the greatest economic importance for clean energy development and the highest risk of supply disruption. ~~The Company includes Pr as a CREE because of its use in conjunction with Nd in didymium as a raw material for high-intensity permanent magnets.~~

didymium – a mixture of the elements Pr and Nd. Didymium is used as a raw material for the manufacture of high-intensity permanent magnets. It is used in safety glasses for glassblowing and blacksmithing, especially when a gas (propane) powered forge is used, where it provides a filter which selectively blocks the yellowish light at 589 nm emitted by the hot sodium in the glass, without having a detrimental effect on general vision, unlike dark welder’s glasses.

Dy – dysprosium (a soft metallic element of the lanthanide series, mainly used in high-performance, permanent magnets). Dy has a high melting point and absorbs neutrons well. It is therefore also used in nuclear control rods to help control nuclear reactions. Dy is also used in laser generating materials.

Eu – europium (a very rare metallic element that is the softest member of the lanthanide series). It is used in making color television tubes and lasers and as a neutron absorber in nuclear research. It is desirable due to its photon emission. Excitation of the Eu atom, by absorption of electrons or by UV radiation, results in changes in energy levels that create a visible emission. Almost all practical uses of Eu utilize this luminescent behavior.

fault – a surface or zone of rock fracture along which there has been displacement.

Feasibility Study (“FS”) – a comprehensive study of a mineral deposit in which all geological, engineering, legal, operating, economic, social, environmental, and other relevant factors are considered in sufficient detail that it could reasonably serve as the basis for a final decision to develop the deposit for mineral production.

FMR – mineralization that includes iron oxide, manganese oxide and REE.

Gd – gadolinium (a malleable, ductile metallic element of the lanthanide series that has seven natural isotopes and 11 artificial isotopes). Two of the natural isotopes, Gd 155 and Gd 157, are the best-known neutron absorbers. Gd is used to improve the heat and corrosion resistance of iron, chromium, and various alloys in medicine as a contrast medium for magnetic resonance imaging and as a radioisotope in bone mineral analysis.

geochemical – related to the distribution and amounts of the chemical elements in minerals, ores, rocks, solids, water and the atmosphere.

geophysical – related to the mechanical, electrical, gravitational, and magnetic properties of the earth’s crust.

GHG – greenhouse gases.

grade – quantity of metal per unit weight of host material.

HREEs – heavy rare earth elements – defined as the elements Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, Lu and Y.

La – lanthanum (the first metallic element of the lanthanide series). La is a strategically important rare earth element due to its use in fluid cracking catalysts (“FCC”), which are used in the production of transportation and aircraft fuel. La is also used in fuel cells and batteries.

LREEs – light rare earth elements, defined as the elements La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Pm, Sm, Eu and Gd.

Table of Contents

LREEs – light rare earth elements, defined as the elements La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Pm, Sm, Eu and Gd.

mineral – a naturally occurring, inorganic crystalline material having a definite chemical composition.

mineralization – a natural accumulation or concentration of one or more minerals in rocks or soil. Also, the process by which minerals are introduced or concentrated in rocks or soil.

monazite – a reddish-brown rare earth phosphate mineral. Monazite-group minerals are typically accompanied by elevated concentrations of uranium and thorium. This has historically limited the processing of monazite. However, this mineral is becoming more attractive because it typically has elevated concentrations of HREEs.

Nd – neodymium (a metallic element of the lanthanide series, occurring principally in REE fluorocarbonate and monazite minerals). Nd is a key constituent of Neodymium-Iron-Boron (“NdFeB”) permanent magnets and an additive to capacitor dielectrics. NdFeB magnets maximize the power/weight ratio and are found in a large variety of motors, generators, sensors, and hard disk drives. Capacitors containing Nd are found in cellular telephones, computers and nearly all other electronic devices. A minor application of Nd is for lasers.

NdFeB – Neodymium-Iron-Boron compound used to manufacture permanent rare earth magnets.

NI 43-101 – National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects of the Canadian Securities Administrators.

open pit – surface mining in which the ore is extracted from a pit or quarry. The geometry of the pit will vary with the characteristics of the ore body.

ore – mineral-bearing rock.

ore body – a mostly solid and fairly continuous mass of mineralization.

Ox – oxide mineralization.

OxCa – oxide carbonate.

oxide – for purposes of the deposits found at the Bear Lodge Property, rare earth bearing mineralized material that results from the complete oxidation by natural processes of sulfide-bearing material.

PFS – preliminary feasibility study or pre-feasibility study. Each mean a comprehensive study of the viability of a mineral project that has advanced to a stage where the mining method, in the case of underground mining, or the pit configuration, in the case of an open pit, has been established and an effective method of mineral processing and/or beneficiation has been determined. It includes a financial analysis based on reasonable assumptions of technical, engineering, legal, operating, economic, social, and environmental factors and the evaluation of other relevant factors that are sufficient for a Qualified Person, acting reasonably, to determine if all or part of any mineral resource may be classified as a Mineral Reserve under NI 43-101 standards.

Pr – praseodymium (a metallic element that constitutes about 4% of the lanthanide content of bastnasite and has a few specific applications, based mainly on its optical properties). It is a common coloring pigment, and is used in photographic filters, airport signal lenses, and welder’s glasses. Because it chemically and magnetically is so similar to its periodic chart neighbors Nd and La, Pr is typically found in small amounts in applications where Nd and La are important, such as NdFeB magnets and catalysts. These latter applications are actually the largest uses for Pr because the magnet and catalyst markets are so large. Thus, Pr plays an important role in extending the availability of the more widely used Nd and La.

RC (reverse circulation) drilling – a rotary drilling method using either a hammer or a tri-cone bit to produce rock cuttings that are forced upward from the bottom of the drill hole to the surface through an inner tube, using liquid and/or air pressure moving downward through an outer tube.

Table of Contents

recovery – the percentage of contained metal actually extracted from ore in the course of processing and/or beneficiating such ore.

REEs – rare earth elements. a group of metallic elements with unique chemical, catalytic, magnetic, metallurgical, and phosphorescent properties.

Sm – samarium (a metallic element of the lanthanide series predominantly used to produce Sm cobalt magnets). Although these magnets are slightly less powerful than NdFeB magnets at room temperature, Sm cobalt magnets can be used over a wider range of temperatures and are less susceptible to corrosion.

stockwork – complex system of structurally controlled or randomly oriented veins that can be standalone ore bodies or occur on the periphery of larger veins. They are also referred to as “stringer zones.”

strike – the direction or trend that a structural surface (e.g., an ore bedding or fault plane) takes as it intersects the horizontal.

sulfide – a mineral combining sulfur and base metals, such as iron and less commonly copper, lead, zinc and/or molybdenum; metallic sulfur bearing mineral associated with primary REE mineralization.

Tb – Terbium is a rare earth metal used in solid state devices as well as magnets in loudspeakers.

Technical Report – means the technical report of the Company dated April 12, 2024 prepared in accordance with Canada’s National Instrument 43-101 - Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects and titled “Technical Report on the Bear Lodge REE Project located in Crook County, Wyoming, USA” by authors Alan C. Noble of Ore Reserves Engineering, Monica Barrero Bouza of EurGeol and Jaye T. Pickarts, Consultant.

TREO – Total Rare Earth Oxide (expressed in wt.%) and consisting of the fourteen (14) individually assayed rare earth element oxides plus yttrium oxide: La2O3, Ce2O3, Pr2O3, Nd2O3, Sm2O3, Eu2O3, Gd2O3, Tb2O3, Dy2O3, Ho2O3, Er2O3, Tm2O3, Yb2O3, Lu2O3, and Y2O3.

TRS – the technical report summary, dated February 29, 2024, relating to the Bear Lodge REE Project prepared in compliance with Item 601(b)(96) and Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K, which was filed as Exhibit 96.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 4, 2024 and is incorporated by reference in this Annual Report.

vein – a sheet like body of mineralized rock. On many properties, veins may consist largely of quartz gangue. However, on the Bear Lodge Property, veins can contain a variable assemblage that includes, but is not limited to, gangue minerals like iron and manganese oxides, quartz, calcite, clay, apatite and/or potassium feldspar with or without ore minerals.

Y – Yttrium is primarily recovered from monazite resources and is used with iron in the manufacture of microwave communication equipment.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

Rare Element was incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada on June 3, 1999 as Spartacus Capital Inc. We are currently governed under the Business Corporations Act (British Columbia) (the “BCBCA”). Our executive office address is P.O. Box 271049, Littleton, Colorado 80127. The telephone number for our executive office is (720) 278-2460. We maintain a corporate website at www.rareelementresources.com.

Originally organized as a “capital pool” company whose activities were focused on the identification and completion of a qualifying transaction as required by the rules of the TSX Venture Exchange (“TSX-V”), we transitioned to a “venture company” on July 25, 2003, coincident with (1) the completion of a reverse takeover acquisition of Rare Element Holdings Ltd. (the qualifying transaction), (2) a name change of “Spartacus Capital Inc.” to “Rare Element Resources Ltd.”, and (3) the completion of a private placement. The Company’s main assets include its proprietary rare earth processing and/or beneficiation and separation technology and its 100% interest in a group of unpatented mining claims and repurchase rights to adjacent private property, together known as the Bear Lodge Property, owned through a wholly owned subsidiary, Rare Element Resources, Inc., a Wyoming corporation.

Table of Contents

Holdings Ltd. (the qualifying transaction), (2) a name change of “Spartacus Capital Inc.” to “Rare Element Resources Ltd.”, and (3) the completion of a private placement. The Company’s main assets include its proprietary rare earth processing and/or beneficiation and separation technology and its 100% interest in a group of unpatented mining claims and ownership of adjacent private property, together known as the Bear Lodge Property, owned through a wholly owned subsidiary, Rare Element Resources, Inc., a Wyoming corporation.

SUBSIDIARIES

We have one direct wholly owned subsidiary, Rare Element Resources, Inc., incorporated in 1997 in the state of Wyoming, USA, formerly known as Paso Rico (USA), Inc. (“Paso Rico”). ~~Rare Element Holdings Ltd., formerly a direct wholly owned subsidiary of ours, was dissolved on August 16, 2023.~~

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

We are currently focused on demonstrating the technical and economic feasibility of our proprietary processing and separation technology through the permitting and licensing, construction, and operation of a ~~planned~~ Demonstration Plant and advancing the Bear Lodge REE Project located near the town of Sundance in northeast Wyoming. The Bear Lodge REE Project consists of several large, disseminated REE deposits and a planned hydrometallurgical plant tothat may be located near Upton, Wyoming. The Bear Lodge REE Project is one of the highest-grade REE deposits identified in North America containing a favorable distribution of CREE.

In its development efforts for the Bear Lodge REE Project, the Company has done extensive laboratory bench-scale and pilot plant testing on metallurgical processes to recover saleable rare earth products and has been granted two patents on its metallurgical processing innovations. More specifically, the Company has pilot tested and received patent protection for a method for the removal of thorium from a rare earth element (REE)-containing acidic solution, as well as a method for the selective extraction of REEs from base metals in a pregnant liquid solution. In accordance with our Intellectual Property Rights Agreement with Synchron, these patented processes have been further advanced through a trade secret process alongside General Atomics, an affiliate of Synchron, the Company’s majority shareholder.

Our near-term focus is on the ~~progression~~operation of the Demonstration Plant as further described below. Assuming the Demonstration Plant operation is successful, the Company plans to evaluate the feasibility of ~~processing~~mining ~~and~~through ~~separating~~producing a separated rare earth oxide utilizing REEs from the Bear Lodge REE Project, as well as from other sources on a commercial scale.

During the first quarter of 2016, we placed the Bear Lodge REE Project under care-and-maintenance due to financial resource constraints and market conditions, and all permitting and licensing activities were suspended at that time. Based on current permitting and licensing timetables and other factors, we anticipate that once formally recommenced, we could receive all permits and licenses for the Bear Lodge REE Project approximately ~~30 to~~ 36 months after resuming permitting and licensing efforts. Commencement of those efforts ~~may~~is be dependent upon our Demonstration Plant’s operating results.

If and when a decision to resume the Bear Lodge REE Project development activities is made, our plan is to advance engineering in preparation for the FS, including an evaluation of a potential step approach to development beginning with a smaller initial production facility utilizing higher-grade material which could then be scaled up. Our ability to begin construction activities on the Bear Lodge REE Project ~~may~~will be subject to various factors, including: (i) the availability of adequate capital, (ii) positive results from the Demonstration Plant’s operations, (iii) an affirmative FS, (iv) securing off-take agreements with customers at adequate prices, (v) obtaining necessary permits and licenses, and (vi) approval from the Company’s board of directors (the “Board of Directors” or the “Board”).

The Bear Lodge REE Project deposit is located near excellent mining infrastructure, including good road access and power lines within two kilometers (1.2 miles) of the Bear Lodge Property. Geographically, the Bear Lodge Property is located 100 kilometers (62.1 miles) east of Gillette, Wyoming, a major infrastructure, support, and logistics center for coal mines in the Powder River Basin that should provide for ready access to many of the required production supplies and materials as well as skilled labor. Additionally, the deposit is situated only 64 kilometers (39.8 miles) from the nearest railhead at Upton, Wyoming, where the Demonstration Plant is sited and the proposed hydrometallurgical plant ismay ~~planned~~also to be sited, ~~allowing access to major distribution channels via the adjacent railhead as well as convenient access to utilities and other infrastructure.~~

Additional information regarding the Bear Lodge REE Project and the Bear Lodge Property is included under the section heading “Item 2. Properties” in this Annual Report.

Table of Contents

allowing access to major distribution channels via the adjacent railhead as well as convenient access to utilities and other infrastructure.

Additional information regarding the Bear Lodge REE Project and the Bear Lodge Property is included under the section heading “Item 2. Properties” in this Annual Report.

RECENT CORPORATE DEVELOPMENTS

Rare Earth Demonstration Plant Project

~~Department~~Construction, Commissioning and Operation of ~~Energy~~the ~~Financial~~Demonstration ~~Award~~Plant

In January 2021, a consortium of companies, of which the Company is a part, received notice from the DoE that the consortium had been selected for negotiation of a potential financial award for the engineering, construction and operation of a rare earth separation and processing Demonstration Plant. The consortium of companies is led by General Atomics, an affiliate of Synchron, the Company’s majority shareholder, and includes certain of General Atomics’ affiliates, the Company, and LNV, an Ardurra Group, Inc. company, as engineering and construction subcontractor. A formal proposal was submitted by the consortium in response to a published Funding Opportunity Announcement in mid-2020 for the construction and operation of a rare earth separation and processing plant utilizing the Company’s proprietary technology to produce commercial-grade products. The DoE finalized the award, and an agreement was executed by the DoE’s grants/agreement officer on September 27, 2021, with an effective date of October 1, 2021. The Company, as a subrecipient of the award, along with the other consortium members, commenced work on the planning and design of the Demonstration Plant project in November 2021, with the Company’s contractual arrangement with General Atomics finalized in December 2021. The DoE’s original funding iscommitment was in the amount of $21,900 and ~~represents~~represented approximately one-half of the originally estimated costs for the Demonstration Plant. ~~The Demonstration Plant will process already stockpiled high-grade mineralized materials from the Bear Lodge REE Project.~~

~~During~~In ~~2022~~September ~~and 2023~~2024, the ~~Company,~~DoE ~~along~~issued ~~with~~its ~~the~~final ~~other~~Project ~~consortium~~Continuation ~~members~~Notice, ~~progressed~~confirming ~~work on~~ the Demonstration Plant,’s ~~and~~readiness ~~this~~for ~~work~~operations. isThis ~~expected~~notice, toalong ~~continue~~with ~~through~~ the ~~anticipated~~NRC’s ~~completion~~approval ~~date~~ of operations received in ~~the~~October ~~latter~~2024, ~~part~~cleared ofthe ~~2025.~~path ~~Through~~for ~~December 31,~~operations ~~2023,~~of the ~~Company~~Demonstration ~~had~~Plant ~~paid~~ to ~~General~~formally ~~Atomics~~commence, aswith ~~leader~~operations ofto ~~the~~process ~~consortium,~~and aseparate ~~total~~the ofREE ~~$15,700~~from ~~toward~~the ~~its~~stockpiled ~~share~~mineral ofsample. During the operation phase, which is expected ~~cost~~to ofcommence in mid-2025, the Demonstration Plant ~~(see~~is ~~Note~~expected 4 to ~~the~~produce ~~Consolidated~~up ~~Financial~~to ~~Statements~~10 ~~for~~tons a(9.1 ~~more~~tonnes) ~~complete~~of ~~discussion)~~NdPr oxide.

In late December 2023, the Demonstration Plant project achieved the DoE’s second go/no-go decision point, with the first being upon completion of engineering in December 2022. Also, in late December, the Demonstration Plant project received a continuation notice following receipt of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the “NRC”) Source Material License and the DoE’s Finding of No Significant Impact (FONSI) through its National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (“NEPA”) review. The completion of these milestones was a gating event for the DoE’s continued sharing of the cost of the Demonstration Plant into construction as provided for in the 2021 financial award. The remaining gating milestone relates to the completion of construction and pre-operational inspections. Operations to process and separate the REEs from the stockpiled sample materials are expected to follow the completion of the Demonstration Plant’s construction for an additional 12-to-15-month period.

Wyoming Energy Authority Financial Award

In ~~November~~December 2022, the ~~Company~~Demonstration ~~received~~Plant ~~notice~~achieved ~~that~~its itfinal ~~had~~engineering ~~been~~design ~~awarded a $4~~milestone,~~400~~ ~~grant~~marking ~~from~~ the ~~WEA~~DoE’s tofirst bego/no-go ~~used~~decision ~~toward~~point. ~~the~~A ~~advancement~~second ofgo/no-go ~~the~~gating ~~Demonstration~~milestone ~~Plant, and a funding agreement~~ was ~~finalized~~achieved in ~~June~~December 2023. ~~The~~with ~~WEA~~the ~~grant~~issuance isby athe ~~cost-reimbursement~~DoE ~~award~~of ~~with~~a ~~payments~~Project ~~tied~~Continuation toNotice, allowing for the ~~achievement~~construction of ~~certain~~the ~~predefined~~ Demonstration Plant ~~milestones~~. AsIn ofSeptember ~~December 31~~2024, ~~2023,~~ the ~~WEA~~DoE ~~had~~issued ~~been~~its ~~invoiced~~final ~~for~~Project ~~the~~Continuation ~~first~~Notice ~~$2,000~~confirming of the ~~$4,400~~Demonstration ~~grant~~Plant’s ~~total~~readiness ~~with~~for ~~the~~operations. ~~achievement~~This ofnotice, ~~the~~along ~~first~~with ~~grant~~the ~~milestone,~~U.S. ~~the~~Nuclear ~~DoE~~Regulatory Commission’s ~~continuation~~(the ~~notice.~~“NRC”) ~~The~~operations ~~Company~~approval ~~received~~under ~~payment~~its ofpreviously ~~this~~issued ~~$2,000~~license (received in ~~January~~October 2024~~. The remaining $2~~),~~400,~~ ~~which~~allowed isfor ~~conditioned on~~ the ~~achievement~~commencement of ~~other,~~Demonstration ~~future~~Plant ~~milestones,~~operations. ~~will~~The beCompany ~~invoiced~~now expects to ~~the~~commence ~~WEA~~operations ~~once those milestones have been achieved, currently expected~~ in ~~the third quarter of 2024~~mid-2025.

Future Funding Needs

AsSince ainception, ~~result~~the ofGeneral ~~its~~Atomics-led ~~financing~~consortium ~~needs,~~has seen increases in the ~~Company~~Demonstration ~~announced~~Plant onproject ~~December 5~~costs, ~~2023~~including ~~its~~expected ~~intention~~final toequipment ~~launch~~costs, adue ~~rights~~to, ~~offering~~among toother ~~raise~~factors, ~~gross~~inflation. ~~proceeds~~As a result of ~~approximately~~these ~~$36~~cost pressures,~~000.~~ InGeneral ~~March 2024~~Atomics, on behalf of the ~~Company~~consortium, ~~completed~~submitted to the ~~rights~~DoE ~~offering~~an ~~for~~updated ~~gross~~Demonstration ~~proceeds~~Plant construction and operations budget in 2024 of approximately $3553,~~800~~600, in which ~~each~~is ~~holder~~approximately of21% ~~the~~higher ~~Company’s~~than ~~common~~the ~~shares~~original asbudget of approximately $43,800. In response, the ~~record~~DoE ~~date~~pledged an additional commitment of ~~December 15~~$2,400 ~~2023~~(increasing ~~was~~its ~~eligible~~total commitment to ~~participate.~~approximately ~~Even~~$24,300) ~~with~~in ~~the~~September ~~funds~~2024 ~~raised~~to inhelp ~~the~~fund ~~rights~~a ~~offering~~portion ~~and~~of ~~the~~this ~~expected~~budget ~~receipt~~increase, ofwith the ~~remainder~~balance ofto be funded by the ~~DoE~~Company, ~~financial~~including ~~support~~any ~~and~~amounts ~~WEA~~in ~~grant~~excess ~~monies,~~of the ~~Company~~$53,600 ~~will~~revised ~~not~~budget ~~have~~total, ~~sufficient~~now ~~funds~~estimated to be approximately $66,000.

Table of Contents

~~progress~~Wyoming ~~certain~~Energy ~~activities,~~Authority ~~including~~Financial ~~the~~Award permitting, licensing, development, and construction related to the Bear Lodge REE Project. In the event the Company cannot secure additional financial resources or complete a strategic transaction in the longer term relating to the development of the Bear Lodge REE Project, it may need to suspend its operational plans or even have to liquidate its business interests, and investors may lose all or part of their investment.

In June 2023, the Company entered into the WEA Funding Agreement for its previously announced award of a $4,400 grant from the WEA to be used toward the advancement of the Demonstration Plant. This award, along with funds contributed by the Company and the DoE, is being used to fund the Demonstration Plant’s construction and operating costs. As of December 31, 2023, the Company had met the conditions allowing for the invoicing of $2,000 of the $4,400 WEA grant total. This $2,000 was subsequently received on January 31, 2024. By September 30, 2024, the Company had met the conditions allowing for the invoicing of an additional $2,000, which was subsequently received in November 2024. The remaining $400 of the $4,400 grant total, which is conditioned on the achievement of other milestones, will be invoiced to the WEA once those milestones have been achieved (expected in mid-2025).

Future Funding Needs

As a result of its financing needs, the Company announced on December 5, 2023 its intention to launch a rights offering. In March 2024, the Company completed the rights offering for gross proceeds of approximately $35,800 in which each holder of the Company’s common shares as of the record date of December 15, 2023 was eligible to participate. Even with the funds raised in the rights offering and the expected receipt of the remainder of the DoE financial support and WEA grant monies, the Company will not have sufficient funds to progress certain activities, including the permitting, licensing, development, and construction related to its Bear Lodge REE Project. In the event the Company cannot secure additional financial resources or complete a strategic transaction in the longer term relating to the development of its Bear Lodge REE Project, it may need to suspend its operational plans or liquidate its business interests, and investors may lose all or part of their investment.

Current External Factors Impacting our Business

~~Throughout~~Through ~~2023~~2024, we continued to monitor the general U.S. political climate and actions taken by the U.S. government to secure a domestic, rare earth supply chain. ~~The~~Due to the dominance of China over the REE supply chain, the U.S. federal government has issued ~~two~~several Presidential Executive Orders, inunder ~~2017~~both the Biden Administration and the first and second Trump Administrations, to encourage and support the establishment of a domestic ~~rare~~REE ~~earth~~ supply chain and to strengthen the defense industrial base with respect to critical minerals, including ~~rare earths~~REEs. On InJanuary ~~June~~20, ~~2019~~2025, President Trump issued the ~~Department~~“Unleashing ofAmerican ~~Commerce~~Energy” ~~released~~Executive ~~its~~Order, ~~report~~which ~~entitled~~included ~~“Federal~~(1) ~~strategy~~several tourgent ~~ensure~~critical ~~secure~~mineral and ~~reliable~~rare ~~supplies~~earth directives, including the immediate review of ~~critical~~all ~~minerals.”~~agency ~~This~~actions ~~was~~that ~~followed~~potentially byburden ~~four~~the ~~U.S.~~development ~~Presidential~~of ~~Determinations~~domestic onenergy ~~July 22,~~resources ~~2019,~~with ~~directed~~particular attention to critical minerals; (2) directing the Secretary of ~~Defense.~~Energy ~~One~~to ~~Presidential~~ensure ~~Determination~~that ~~declared~~critical ~~that~~mineral “projects, including the ~~domestic~~processing ~~production~~of ~~capability~~critical minerals, receive consideration for ~~rare~~federal ~~earth~~support; ~~metals~~(3) ~~and~~directing ~~alloys~~the isSecretary ~~essential~~of Defense to consider the ~~national~~needs ~~defense~~of the U.”S. ~~Since~~in ~~then,~~supplying ~~four~~and ~~more~~maintaining ~~Presidential~~the ~~Determinations/Waivers~~national ~~have~~defense ~~been~~stockpile ~~signed~~to ~~that~~provide ~~support~~a ~~the~~robust ~~critical~~supply ~~mineral~~of ~~industry,~~critical ~~which~~minerals; ~~include~~and ~~rare~~(4) ~~earth~~establishing ~~elements~~the U.S. ~~The~~position ~~“Supply~~as ~~Chain~~the ~~Resilience~~leading ~~(Waiver)”~~producer ~~signed~~and ~~February 27~~processor of rare earth minerals, ~~2023~~which ~~allows~~will ~~funds~~create tojobs beand ~~directed~~prosperity ~~towards~~at ~~industrial~~home, ~~base~~strengthen supply chains ~~critical~~for to the ~~Department~~U.S. ofand ~~Defense~~its allies, ~~including~~and ~~rare~~reduce ~~earth~~the ~~mineral~~global ~~extraction,~~influence ~~processing,~~of malign and ~~separation~~adversarial states. ~~These~~Additionally, ~~initiatives~~in ~~have~~early ~~increased~~2025, the ~~federal~~Trump ~~government’s~~Administration ~~level~~announced ofseveral ~~interest~~potential innew ~~the~~and/or ~~rare~~increased ~~earth~~tariffs ~~industry~~ and ~~our~~other ~~potential~~trade ~~rare~~restrictions ~~earth~~on ~~products~~exports asto athe ~~critical~~United ~~upstream~~States. ~~segment~~The impact of ~~the~~these ~~supply~~trade ~~chain,~~restrictions ~~potentially~~or ~~countering~~tariffs ~~China’s~~are ~~dominance~~unknown inand could have an impact on the ~~global~~REE ~~rare~~supply ~~earth~~chain ~~market~~and/or our business operations.

In addition, the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and other external influences (such as the Russia/Ukraine war and conflicts in the Middle East) have further focused the U.S. government on the importance of implementing secure domestic supply chains, including for rare earths, leading to a further Presidential Executive Order issued in February 2021 calling for an expedited 100-day review to address the strengthening of America’s supply chains, specifically requiring the Department of Defense to (i) submit a report identifying “risks in the supply chain of critical minerals and other strategic materials including rare earth elements” and (ii) make policy recommendations to address the risks. The 100-day review led to another Executive Order on June 8, 2021, calling for an investment in sustainable domestic and international production and processing of critical minerals, including a recommendation that Congress take actions to recapitalize and restore the National Defense Stockpile of critical minerals and materials. The Company monitors and participates in these initiatives as they are critical to the production of rare earth magnets used in the United States to support the manufacturing of, among other things, defense technologies, electric vehicles, wind turbines, consumer electronics, and oil refining equipment. In December 2023, China announced it had banned the export of technology to make rare earth magnets, adding to their previous export ban of critical material extraction and separation technology.

In addition, the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and other external influences (such as the Russia/Ukraine war and conflicts in the Middle East, and tariffs on certain critical mineral exports from China) have further focused the U.S. government on the importance of implementing secure domestic supply chains, including for REEs. In December 2023, China announced it had banned the export of technology to make rare earth magnets, adding to its previous export ban of critical material extraction and separation technology. In December 2024, China further banned the export of certain critical minerals, including gallium, germanium, and antimony, which have widespread military applications.

Table of Contents

TRENDS AND DESCRIPTION OF THE REE MARKET

Uses for REE Products

Due to variations in physical, chemical, molecular and application characteristics, different rare earth metals possess their own market uses, drivers and challenges. REEs are used in computers, cellular telephones, television screens, wind turbines, fuel cells, automobiles, magnetic refrigeration, energy-efficient lighting, petroleum-refining catalysts, and numerous other modern specialty technologies including military applications. Lately, the major driver for the rare earth metals market has been the increasing consumption in the manufacture of permanent NdFeB rare earth magnets, in which rare earth metals such as Nd, Pr, Tb, and Dy are used. Specifically, these REEs are used in hybrid and electric vehicle motors as well as in wind turbines. Ce, La, and other REEs are widely used in applications such as metallurgy, catalysts, glass, ceramics, optical instruments, and polishing.

Due to variations in physical, chemical, molecular and application characteristics, different rare earth metals possess their own market uses, drivers and challenges. REEs are used in computers, cellular telephones, television screens, wind turbines, fuel cells, automobiles, magnetic refrigeration, energy-efficient lighting, petroleum-refining catalysts, and numerous other modern specialty technologies, including military applications. Lately, the major driver for the rare earth metals market has been increasing consumption in the manufacture of permanent NdFeB rare earth magnets, in which rare earth metals such as Nd, Pr, Tb, and Dy are used. Specifically, these REEs are used in hybrid and electric vehicle motors as well as in wind turbines. Ce, La, and other REEs are widely used in applications such as metallurgy, catalysts, glass, ceramics, optical instruments, and polishing.

Trends Affecting REE Supply, Demand and Prices

In 2023, rare earth mine production increased by approximately 8% to 338,000 tonnes TREO relative to 2022 with refined production estimated to be 237,000 tonnes TREO, a 9% increase from 2022. Production from China, Australia, and the U.S. contributed to the increased mine production. Despite the production increases from Australia and the U.S., China still dominates the global supply of rare earths at both the mined and refined stages, accounting for 63% of global mine

10According to the research and advisory firm Benchmark Mineral Intelligence (“Benchmark”), rare earth mine production in 2024 increased by approximately 9% to 389,738 tonnes (429,653 tons) TREO relative to 2023 with refined supply estimated to be 372,867 tonnes (411,054 tons) TREO, an approximately 19% increase from 2023. Mine production from China (+21,000 tonnes or 23,151 tons), Laos (+8,700 tonnes or 9,591 tons), the U.S. (+3,700 tonnes or 4,079 tons), and Brazil (+1,000 tonnes or 1,102 tons) contributed to the increase. Despite the production increases from Laos and the U.S., China still dominates the global supply of rare earths at both the mined and refined stages, accounting for approximately 69% of global mine production and approximately 93% of refined production in 2024. China’s share of global refining is partly influenced by U.S. production of TREO concentrates which are sent to China.

~~Table of Contents~~

~~production~~In ~~and~~the ~~84%~~rest of ~~refined~~the ~~production~~world, specifically in ~~2023~~the U.S. ~~China’s~~and ~~share~~Australia, certain competitors form a second tier of ~~global~~rare ~~refining~~earth isconcentrate ~~partly~~producing ~~influenced~~companies, bywith 45,247 tonnes (49,881 tons) TREO mine production coming from the U.S. ~~production~~and ofapproximately 11,740 tonnes (12,942 tons) TREO ~~concentrates~~coming ~~which~~from ~~are~~Australia, ~~sent~~in toeach ~~China~~case in 2024. A facility in Malaysia produces separated rare earths (NdPr oxide, La oxide, and Ce oxide) from TREO mined in Australia.

In the rest of the world, specifically in the U.S. and Australia, certain competitors form a second tier of rare earth concentrate producing companies, with 45,000 tonnes TREO mine production coming from the U.S. and approximately 46,000 tonnes TREO coming from Australia. A facility in Malaysia produces separated rare earths from TREO mined in Australia.

The rapid growth in demand for certain REEs, specifically Nd and Pr used in permanent magnets for electric motors and generators, is expected to continue as these magnets give improved performance compared with other magnets according to Benchmark. The increased focus on clean energy isin 2024 was driving the demand for wind turbines and electric vehicles, which in turn ~~will~~drove ~~drive~~ the demand for rare earth magnets. ~~Magnet~~In ~~demand~~2024, ~~now~~magnet ~~accounts~~demand accounted for ~~more~~about ~~than 40~~37% (approximately 69,000 tonnes or 76,067 tons TREO) of ~~total~~global rare earth demand and ~~greater~~about ~~than 80~~77% (approximately $4.8 billion) of the total global REE market value (approximately $6.2 billion). Near-term neodymium-praseodymium (“NdPr”) oxide prices have trended downward, ~~however~~(current prices around $56/kg), as a result of persistent market surpluses with capacity expansions at Chinese mines having been the largest source of supply growth since 2015. Longer-term, the NdPr price is expected to rise (Benchmark estimates $100+/kg. starting in 2029) as a supply gap begins to take hold and existing sources of supply become more strained seeking to meet the projected growth in demand.

The research and advisory firm, Wood Mackenzie Limited (“Wood Mackenzie”), is forecasting that magnet applications, particularly for electric vehicles, and offshore wind energy generation, will continue to increase their share of overall demand for rare earth magnets rising from 48% in 2023 to 54% in 2028. This increase in demand for magnet rare earths, namely Nd-Pr, Dy and Tb oxides, is expected to drive future growth above other rare earth compounds and support higher prices. Vehicle sales have experienced robust growth with every sixth vehicle now having a plug (battery-powered and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles) and every fourth being electrified (battery-powered, hybrid and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles). Global plug-in electric vehicles sales reached 14 million units in 2023, an increase of 35% compared to 2022. During 2023, the annual global demand for rare earth oxides for use in permanent magnets reached 81,600 tonnes TREO, representing 46% of total REE demand. (Source: Wood MacKenzie, Global Rare Earths Short-Term Outlook, Jan. 2024).

~~Supply~~Benchmark is forecasting that magnet applications, particularly for electric vehicles, and offshore wind energy generation, will continue to increase their share of overall demand ~~factors~~for rare earth magnets rising from 37% in 2024 to 48% by 2030. This increase in demand for ~~REE~~magnet ~~products~~rare ~~that~~earths, ~~could~~namely ~~positively~~Nd-Pr, ~~impact~~Dy and Tb oxides, is expected to drive future ~~REE~~growth above other rare earth compounds and support higher prices. ~~include~~Electric ~~the~~vehicle ~~following~~sales have experienced robust growth, ~~among~~going ~~other~~from ~~factors:~~13% global market penetration in 2022, to 19.5% penetration in 2024, and, according to Benchmark, to an estimated 46% penetration by 2030.

Supply and demand factors for REE products that could positively impact future REE prices include, among other factors, the following:

●

the use of Nd, Pr, Tb and Dy in high-strength magnets that are critical to multiple defense applications, hybrid and electric vehicles and wind power generation facilities, particularly large off-shore installations;

●

the use of high-strength NdFeB magnets in the miniaturization of electronic products;

~~● the use of La in the fluid catalytic cracking process used by refineries processing lower quality crude oil that consumes greater quantities of the catalysts;~~11

Table of Contents

●

the use of La in the fluid catalytic cracking process used by refineries in the processing of lower quality crude oil that consumes greater quantities of the catalysts;

●

the increased use of REEs in the drive to reduce global carbon emissions;

●

China consolidating its REE industry and closing small, inefficient, and polluting REE producers;

●

the capping of production and the tightening of export volumes and imports by China;

●

changes in trade policies, including changes in taxes or import/export duties for REE materials by the U.S. government and/or China;

●

the use of Ce in glass, ceramics, glass polishing, and advanced water filtration applications;

●

the continued research and commercialization of new applications for REE products; and

●

the rising costs in China due to stricter environmental controls and rising wages.

Supply and demand factors for REE products that could negatively impact future REE prices include ~~the following~~, among other factors, the following:

●

the potential for oversupply of certain REEs due to new production inside and outside of China and/or increased exports from China;

●

government policy changes (U.S. or otherwise) that would curtail incentives for electric vehicle adoption and/or wind energy development;

●

development or enhancements of alternative electric motor or generator technologies that may use less or no REE magnet materials;

Table of Contents

●

strong demand for selected REEs like magnet materials, driving overproduction of other co-product REEs and creating oversupply conditions for non-magnet REEs;

●

the potential substitution of other materials for higher-priced REEs;

● the development of new, lower cost sources of supply that could reduce ~~or eliminate~~ the market price for REEs;

●

economization by intermediate and end-users to reduce the usage of REEs in end-products;

●

the potential for increased recycling of higher-priced REEs;

●

fluctuating oil, gas and coal prices that could reduce the demand for technologies using REEs;

●

static or lower global economic growth, reducing overall demand growth for REEs; and

●

potential by-product production of REEs that may increase supply irrespective of the economics of REE production from primary mines.

The feasibility of the Bear Lodge REE Project and our ability to raise additional funds to develop the Bear Lodge REE Project ~~may~~will likely be impacted by global supply and demand and future prices of REEs.

SEASONALITY

At this stage, seasonality in the state of Wyoming is not a material factor to ~~any~~our ~~future~~ exploration, development, and operating activities on the Bear Lodge Property. Snowfall or extreme temperature in the winter may temporarily limit our access to the Bear Lodge Property, limit work activities on the Demonstration Plant or limit future work on a commercial-scale processing facility from ~~approximately~~time to time during the months of November through June.

COMPETITION

The industry in which we operate is highly competitive. We compete with other mining and exploration companies, both within the U.S. and internationally, for the exploration and development of mineral properties and production of REEs as well as funding for our projects. There is competition for the limited number of opportunities, some involving companies having substantially greater financial resources, staff, and facilities than we do, and some with rare earth operational experience. We also compete with other mining and exploration companies in our efforts to hire and retain experienced professionals. As a result, we may have difficulty attracting or retaining key personnel or securing outside technical resources.

In ~~2023~~2024, China accounted for an estimated 6369% of global REE mine production and 8493% of global refined production. ~~Wood~~Benchmark ~~MacKenzie~~ has forecasted that China will remain the primary source of mine supply, although China’s share of global mine production is projected to decline to 56% by 2028. China is also expected to remain the largest contributor of refined supply, but China’s share of total refined production is projected to decrease to 70% by 2027. In similar fashion, demand will remain Asia driven, with China maintaining a dominant position. This gives the Chinese producers a continued competitive advantage in controlling the supply and processing of REEs and an opportunity to influence prices to discourage competition. Additionally, any increases in the quantities of REEs exported from other nations will likely only increase supply and may result in price reductions, reduced margins, and loss of potential market share, any of which could materially adversely affect our business. As a result of these factors, the Company may not be able to compete effectively against current and future competitors. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Annual Report.

PATENTS, TRADEMARKS AND LICENSES

As of December 31, 2023, we had on file U.S. provisional patent applications relating to processing methods, including (1) selective recovery of REEs from mixed chloride leach solutions using oxalic acid, and (2) separation of thorium from bulk REEs in a solvent extraction (“SX”) process. These provisional applications provided the basis for the current patent portfolio, which includes two issued U.S. patents and one pending U.S. divisional patent application, and fifteen issued foreign patents across thirteen foreign jurisdictions. The issued U.S. patents have a term of 20 years measured from the filing date of the utility patent applications. We licensed our intellectual property, including patents and related technical

Table of Contents

~~information,~~mine production is projected to ~~our~~decline ~~majority~~to ~~shareholder~~43% by 2030. China is also expected to remain the largest contributor of refined supply, ~~Synchron~~but China’s share of total refined production is projected to decrease to 71% by 2030. Demand is projected to remain Asia-driven, with China maintaining a dominant position. This gives the Chinese producers a continued competitive advantage in ~~October~~controlling ~~2017,~~the supply and ~~the~~processing ~~license~~of ~~became~~REEs ~~exclusive~~and an opportunity to ~~Synchron~~influence prices to discourage competition. Additionally, any increase in the quantities of REEs exported from other nations will likely only increase supply and ~~its~~may ~~affiliates~~result in ~~October~~price ~~2019~~reductions, reduced margins, and loss of potential market share, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business. ~~The~~As a result of these factors, the Company ~~retains~~may anot ~~limited~~be ~~right~~able to ~~use~~compete ~~its~~effectively ~~intellectual~~against ~~property~~current and ~~any~~future ~~enhancements thereto~~competitors. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Annual Report. ~~Several of these technologies have potential value for application in other industries.~~

PATENTS, TRADEMARKS AND LICENSES

As of December 31, 2024, we had on file U.S. provisional patent applications relating to processing methods, including (1) selective recovery of REEs from mixed chloride leach solutions using oxalic acid, and (2) separation of thorium from bulk REEs in a solvent extraction (“SX”) process. These provisional applications provide the basis for the current patent portfolio, which includes two issued U.S. patents and one pending U.S. divisional patent application, and fifteen issued foreign patents across thirteen foreign jurisdictions. The issued U.S. patents have a term of 20 years measured from the filing date of the utility patent applications. We licensed our intellectual property, including patents and related technical information, to our majority shareholder, Synchron, in October 2017, and the license became exclusive to Synchron and its affiliates in October 2019. The Company retains a limited right to use its intellectual property and any enhancements thereto. Several of these technologies may have potential value for application in other industries. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Annual Report.

ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATION

Our exploration and planned development, mining and processing activities are subject to extensive and demanding environmental laws and regulations under various federal, state, county and local laws relating to the protection of the environment, which generally includes air and water quality, hazardous waste management, radionuclide handling and reclamation. Failure to comply with these requirements can result in civil and/or criminal liability for non-compliance and governmental fines and penalties. Also, developments or changes in the law could require us to make environmental expenditures significantly greater than those we currently expect that could materially or adversely affect us. Environmental laws historically have evolved in a manner that requires stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors, and employees. Current and future laws, regulations and permits ~~will~~could impose significant costs, liabilities or obligations orand could limit or prevent our ability to continue operations or undertake new operations. A future change in the U.S. presidential administration or in the composition of the Congress could result in more stringent environmental regulation of our operations. In addition, under various federal, state and local laws and regulations, a current or former owner or operator of a property may be liable for the cost to remove or remediate contamination resulting from the presence or discharge of hazardous or toxic substances, wastes or products on, under or from such property. Costs to address contamination can be substantial and liability under such laws may attach without regard to whether the owner or operator caused or was responsible for such contamination, and the liability may be joint and several. Moreover, the presence of contamination could expose us to third-party liability (e.g., for cleanup costs, bodily injury or property damage), subject our properties to liens in favor of the government, impose restrictions on the manner in which a property may be used, or materially or adversely affect our ability to sell, lease or develop properties.

Our Bear Lodge Property in Wyoming is subject to federal and state environmental laws, regulations, and permits. The federal agency with primary regulatory jurisdiction is the U.S. Forest Service (the “USFS”), Bear Lodge Ranger District, Sundance, Wyoming. The state agency with regulatory jurisdiction is the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality (the “WDEQ”). We operate under approvals and permits granted by these two agencies and have established a surety ~~bond~~bonds to ensure environmental reclamation of areas disturbed. As of December 31, ~~2023~~2024, the Company holds surety bonds with the state of Wyoming totaling $~~182~~185. Prior to operating, we will require several other permits and licenses, including those issued by the NRC, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, and others.

Our Demonstration Plant is subject to federal, state, county and local licenses and permits, including an NRC source material possession license, USFS road use permit and WDEQ air quality and storm water permits, among others. As of December 31, 2023, the Company held a surety bond, totaling $917, with the state of Wyoming for the reclamation of the Demonstration Plant.

MINERALS EXPLORATION REGULATION

Mining operations and exploration and development activities are subject to various national, state, county and local laws and regulations in the U.S. that govern prospecting, exploration, development, mining, production, processing, exports, taxes, labor standards, occupational health, waste disposal, protection of the environment, mine safety, hazardous substances, and other matters. The Company believes that it is in compliance in all material respects with applicable mining, health, safety and environmental statutes and regulations. There are no current orders or notices of violations relating to the Company under applicable laws and regulations.

Compliance with these laws and regulations may impose substantial costs on the Company and could subject it to significant potential liabilities. Changes in these laws or regulations could require us to expend significant resources to comply with new laws or regulations, or changes to current requirements, and could have a material adverse effect on our business operations.

Table of Contents

Our Demonstration Plant is subject to federal, state, county and local licenses and permits, including an NRC source material possession license, USFS road use permit and WDEQ air quality and storm water permits, among others. As of December 31, 2024, the Company held a surety bond, totaling $917 and secured by cash collateral of $195, with the state of Wyoming for the reclamation of the Demonstration Plant.

MINERALS EXPLORATION REGULATION

Mining operations and exploration and development activities are subject to various federal, state, county and local laws and regulations in the U.S. that govern prospecting, exploration, development, mining, production, processing, exports, taxes, labor standards, occupational health, waste disposal, protection of the environment, mine safety, hazardous substances, and other matters. The Company believes that it is in compliance in all material respects with applicable mining, health, safety and environmental statutes and regulations. There are no current orders or notices of violations relating to the Company under applicable laws and regulations.

MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REGULATIONS

Pursuant to Section 1503(a) of the Dodd–Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd–Frank Act”), issuers that are operators, or that have a subsidiary that is an operator, of a coal or other mine in the U.S. are required to disclose in their periodic reports filed with the SEC information regarding specified health and safety violations, orders and citations, related assessments and legal actions, and mining-related fatalities. During the year ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024, our Bear Lodge Property was not subject to regulation by the federal Mine Safety and Health Administration under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977.

EMPLOYEES

At December 31, ~~2023~~2024, we had ~~two~~seven full-time employees and no part-time employees. Our employees are not covered by any collective bargaining agreements. When required, our employees will engage the services of third parties under consulting or service agreements.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

We make available, free of charge, on or through our Internet website, at www.rareelementresources.com, our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and our current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Our website and the information contained therein or connected thereto are not intended to be, and are not, incorporated into this Annual Report.

Our reports and other information can be inspected on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. The Company also files reports under Canadian regulatory requirements on the System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR+”). The Company’s reports which are filed on SEDAR+ can be found under the Company’s SEDAR+ profile at www.sedarplus.ca.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The following sets forth certain risks and uncertainties that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or results of operations and the trading price of our common shares, which may decline, and investors may lose all or part of their investment. Additional risks and uncertainties that we do not presently know or that we currently ~~deem immaterial may also impair our business operations. We cannot assure you that we will successfully address these risks. Our risk factors are grouped into the following categories:~~

Table of Contents

deem immaterial may also impair our business operations. We cannot assure you that we will successfully address these risks. Our risk factors are grouped into the following categories:

●

Risks Related to Our Business;

●

Risks Related to the Mineral Exploration, Development, Mining and Processing Industries;

●

Risks Related to Our Common Stock; and

●

General Risk Factors.

Risks Related to Our Business

We may not be able to ~~complete~~operate our Demonstration Plant project for a sufficient period of time to gather the information required for a commercialization decision and we do not have direct control over the DoE relationship for its cost-share funding.

The approved DoE schedule has one remaining go/no-go decision point prior to the start of operations. Should the project team and/or the DoE determine not to continue with the project, funding would be halted, and the project would be terminated or delayed, which could have a material adverse effect on our development and operations plans.

14We are subject to the impact of inflation on wages, capital equipment, general supplies and reagents in the operation of our Demonstration Plant. If the additional funds required by these inflationary cost measures were to prevent us from having or being able to secure the funds to operate the Demonstration Plant for a sufficient amount of time to gather the information required for a commercial-scale plant decision, this could adversely have an impact on our future development plans. Additionally, the contracting for some services relating to the Demonstration Plant, including engineering and construction services, was completed by another consortium member and any disputes over cost increases are not controlled by us and may result in contractor payment disputes, liens or other delays to the project. Further, the DoE agreement is with General Atomics, and we do not have direct control over the DoE relationship, invoicing and disposition of the equipment post-operations.

~~Table of Contents~~

Current inflationary conditions may adversely impact the ability to complete the Demonstration Plant construction and operations.

We are subject to the impact of inflation on wages, capital equipment, general supplies and reagents in the construction and operation of our Demonstration Plant that are expected to require supplemental funding or a change in scope of the planned operation. If such supplemental funding need is in excess of our financial resources, including the proceeds from the March 2024 rights offering, and further funding cannot be secured, the Demonstration Plant may not be able to operate for a sufficient amount of time, or its scope could be reduced, either of which could adversely impact the intended results.

We have no revenues from operations and expect to incur losses for a significant period of time. Any future revenues and profits are uncertain.

We have incurred losses since our inception, and further losses are anticipated in the development of our business. As of December 31, ~~2023~~2024, we had cash and cash equivalents of $326,~~633~~732. During the year ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024, we consumed cash of $1112,~~706~~178 between our operating and investing activities.

We announced, on December 5, 2023, our intention to launch a rights offering to raise approximately $36,000 in gross proceeds. In March 2024, the Company completed the rights offering for gross proceeds of approximately $35,800 in which each holder of the Company’s common shares as of the record date of December 15, 2023 was eligible to participate. Even with the funds raised in ~~the~~our March 2024 rights offering and the expected 2025 receipt of the ~~additional~~final $2,400 in grant monies from the WEA, we will not have sufficient funds to progress our longer-term activities, including the permitting, licensing, development, and construction related to ~~the~~our Bear Lodge REE Project. Therefore, the achievement of these activities will be dependent upon the receipt of additional funds through financings, off-take agreements, joint ventures, strategic transactions, or sales of various assets. Ultimately, in the event that we cannot secure additional financial resources, or complete a strategic transaction in the longer term, we may need to suspend our operational plans or ~~even have to~~ liquidate our business interests, and investors may lose all or part of their investment.

Our largest shareholder beneficially owns a majority of our common shares, has significant influence on, and control over the outcome of, our major corporate decisions, including veto power over some matters, and could take actions that may not be viewed favorably by certain other shareholders, any of which actions could adversely affect the market price of our common shares.

As of March 1417, ~~2024~~2025, Synchron owned approximately 70.6% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company. Additionally, Synchron has approval rights for certain corporate actions and the right to nominate three of seven directors to the Company’s Board. Pursuant to the investment agreement, dated October 2, 2017, by and between the Company and Synchron (“the Investment Agreement”), Synchron has significant influence on, and control over the outcome of, certain of our major corporate decisions and matters requiring shareholder approval, including the election of directors, mergers, consolidations and acquisitions, the sale of all or substantially all of our assets and other decisions affecting our capital structure, the amendment of our certificate of incorporation and articles, and our winding up and dissolution. These rights, along with the concentration of ownership and voting power with Synchron, (i) may make it more difficult for any other holder or group of holders of our common shares to significantly influence the way we are managed or the direction of our business and (ii) may make it more difficult for another company to acquire us and for shareholders to receive any related takeover premium unless Synchron approves the acquisition. The interests of Synchron with respect to matters potentially or actually involving or affecting us, such as future acquisitions, financings, and other corporate opportunities, and attempts to acquire us, may conflict with the interests of our other shareholders.

By granting a license in our intellectual property rights, we may be limited in our ability to protect our intellectual property rights, which could adversely impact our competitive position or results of operations.

Table of Contents

tobusiness ~~enforce~~and or(ii) may ~~defend~~make ~~our~~it ~~intellectual~~more ~~property~~difficult ~~rights~~for ~~against~~another ~~infringement~~company ~~and~~to ~~unauthorized~~acquire ~~use,~~us and tofor ~~protect~~shareholders ~~our~~to ~~trade~~receive ~~secrets.~~any ~~Further,~~related bytakeover ~~granting~~premium aunless ~~license~~Synchron toapproves ~~use~~the ~~our~~acquisition. ~~intellectual~~The ~~property,~~interests weof ~~may~~Synchron bewith ~~limited~~respect ~~in our ability~~ to ~~protect~~matters ~~our~~potentially ~~intellectual~~or ~~property~~actually ~~rights~~involving ~~by legal recourse~~ or ~~otherwise.~~affecting ~~In defending our intellectual property rights~~us, wesuch ~~may~~as ~~place~~future ~~our intellectual property at risk of being invalidated~~acquisitions, ~~held unenforceable~~financings, ~~narrowed~~and inother ~~scope,~~corporate ~~or otherwise limited~~opportunities, ~~any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business~~ and ~~financial~~attempts ~~condition. Our inability~~ to ~~preserve~~acquire orus, ~~maintain~~may anconflict ~~interest~~with inthe ~~certain~~interests ~~intellectual~~of ~~property rights could adversely impact~~ our ~~competitive~~other ~~position or results of operations~~shareholders.

On October 2, 2017, we entered into an Intellectual Property Rights Agreement with Synchron pursuant to which Synchron and its affiliates were granted certain perpetual rights to the intellectual property of the Company relating to its rare earths’ patents and related technical information. Upon the exercise of its option on October 16, 2019, Synchron and its affiliates’ intellectual property rights became exclusive, subject to the Company’s ownership and limited use rights in the intellectual property and any improvements made thereon. As a result of the Intellectual Property Rights Agreement, we may be forced to enforce or defend our intellectual property rights against infringement and unauthorized use, and to protect our trade secrets. Further, by granting a license to use our intellectual property, we may be limited in our ability to protect our intellectual property rights by legal recourse or otherwise. In defending our intellectual property rights, we may place our intellectual property at risk of being invalidated, held unenforceable, narrowed in scope, or otherwise limited, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. Our inability to preserve or maintain an interest in certain intellectual property rights could adversely impact our competitive position or results of operations.

We have suspended our federal and state licensing, permitting progression for our Bear Lodge REE Project, and there is a risk to the resumption of those efforts in a timely and cost-effective manner.

During the first quarter of 2016, we placed the Bear Lodge REE Project on care-and-maintenance, and all licensing and permitting activities were suspended, including the environmental impact statement (“EIS”) process, state permitting, and the NRC licensing process. The Company continued to hold the Bear Lodge REE Project on care-and-maintenance through 2023. In 2024, we ~~plan~~resumed ~~to resume~~ certain of these activities, including certain environmental data collection and technical report updates. However, our ability to obtain further financing to fund the full permitting and development of the Bear Lodge REE Project beyond what is allowed by the funds raised in the March 2024 rights offering is uncertain.

Our ability and timing to exercise our right to purchase certain non-mineral lands for stockpile storage and processing operations is uncertain.

Our current plan of operations for the Bear Lodge REE Project includes a waste rock storage site located on private property adjacent to the planned mine. This private property consists of 640 acres and was sold to a third party on October 26, 2016. Although we hold a repurchase option on the property until October 2024, our ability and the timing of our exercise of the repurchase option is uncertain. If we were unable to repurchase the property, we would have to update our planned operations to identify an alternative waste rock storage area. Additionally, we hold a land purchase option on private property located in Upton, Wyoming, which is the location for our planned processing operations. If we are unable to maintain or exercise the purchase option, we would have to locate and secure another site as a suitable rare earth processing location.

We have no history of producing mineral products from our properties.

We have no history of mining, recovering, or refining any mineral products, and our Bear Lodge REE Project is not in development or production. There can be no assurance that the Bear Lodge REE Project will be successfully developed and placed into production, produce minerals or products in commercial quantities or otherwise generate operating earnings. Advancing properties from the exploration stage into development and commercial production requires significant capital and time and will be subject to further feasibility studies, permitting and licensing requirements and construction of the mine, processing plants, roads and related works and infrastructure. We will continue to incur losses until such time, if ever, when our mining activities successfully reach commercial production levels and generate sufficient revenue to fund continuing operations. There is no certainty that we will produce revenue from any source, operate profitably, or provide a return on investment in the future. If we are unable to generate revenues or profits, our shareholders might not be able to realize returns on their investment in our common shares.

The planned development of our Bear Lodge REE Project involves numerous uncertainties that could affect the feasibility or profitability of the project.

Mine development projects typically require a number of years and significant expenditures during the exploration and development phases before production is possible. The economic feasibility of exploration and development projects is based on many factors, such as the following:

●

completion of feasibility studies to evaluate mineral resources and mineral reserves and commercial viability;

●

the timing and cost, which can be considerable, of further exploration, licensing, permitting and construction of infrastructure, mining, processing and/or beneficiation facilities;

● our ability to utilize our proprietary process technologies, which could encounter problems or unexpected costs in scale-up;

Table of Contents

●

our ability to utilize our proprietary process technologies, which could encounter problems or unexpected costs in scale-up;

●

securing commercially viable sales outlets for our REE products;

● the potential need to enter into joint venture or other partnership arrangements to develop the ~~Projects~~Company’s projects;

●

the availability and costs of equipment, supplies and skilled labor, as required;

●

the availability and cost of appropriate processing and/or refining arrangements, if required;

●

compliance with environmental and other governmental approval and permit requirements;

●

the availability of funds to finance exploration, development, and construction activities, as warranted;

●

future prices for rare earth minerals;

●

potential opposition from non-governmental organizations, environmental, indigenous, or local groups or inhabitants that may delay or prevent development activities;

●

potential increases in exploration, construction, and operating costs due to changes in the cost of labor, fuel, power, materials, or supplies;

●

potential shortages of mineral processing and/or beneficiation, construction or other facilities-related equipment or supplies; and

●

the ability to attract and retain talent for development and operation of the Bear Lodge REE Project.

It is common in exploration programs and in development, construction, and mine start-ups to experience unplanned problems, delays, and ~~delays~~substantial cost overruns. Accordingly, our activities may not result in profitable mining operations, and we may not succeed in establishing mining operations or profitably producing minerals from our ~~Projects~~projects at all or in a reasonable timeframe.

Joint ventures and other partnerships may expose us to risks.

We will require additional capital through investment, joint ventures and/or other partnership arrangements with current investors or other parties for the development of our ~~Projects~~projects. Although such arrangements may lessen our financial burden in exploring and developing the ~~Projects~~projects, they will likely also dilute our interest therein or affect our ability to control development of any of the ~~Projects~~projects. Our ability to attract additional capital may be limited by our majority shareholder Synchron, as it holds certain contractual approval rights pursuant to the Investment Agreement, and its approval may be required. In addition, Synchron has significant influence on, or the ability to control the outcome of, certain of our major corporate decisions and matters requiring shareholder approval. Any failure of a joint venture partner or other partner to meet its obligations to us or to third parties, or any disputes with respect to the parties’ respective rights and obligations, could have a material adverse effect on the joint venture or other partnership arrangement and, in turn, on our business performance and on our ability to develop the ~~Projects~~projects.

Subject to further financing, and progression and outcome of the Demonstration Plant, we may commence a FS on our Bear Lodge REE Project, and the results of this FS are uncertain.

In October 2014, we completed a PFS for our Bear Lodge REE Project that updated our mineral resource estimate and refined plans for our process technology. We subsequently updated the mineral resource and more recently completed a TRS ~~in 2024~~ (See “Item 2. Properties” of this Annual Report) and ~~are~~Technical inReport ~~the process of completing an NI 43-101 compliance technical report~~ for the Bear Lodge REE Project; however, the economic assessment of the Bear Lodge REE Project has not been progressed through an updated FS. Subject to further financing and the results of the Demonstration Plant, we may resume work on an FS. Whether the Company undertakes a FS in the future and, if so, the results of any such study, are uncertain and may indicate project economics that are more or less favorable than those previously reported in 2014 or in the TRS or Technical Report. As our project optimization efforts continue, we cannot ensure that the FS will be based upon all of the same inputs used in the PFS and TRS. As a result, we may need to update our processing and/or beneficiation technology, and/or project development plans to enhance economics or further study aspects of the Bear Lodge REE Project. This could result in significant additional delays and expenses or could make financing efforts with respect to such efforts more difficult or not possible. In addition, there is a risk that the Company may not resume work on a FS.

Our viability as a rare earth company depends, in large part, on the financing, licensing, permitting, development and operation of our Bear Lodge REE Project, which is our only rare earth project.

Table of Contents

~~and~~Our ~~processing~~viability ~~and/or~~as ~~beneficiation facilities in~~ a ~~reasonable~~rare ~~timeframe.~~earth Ifcompany ~~we are unable to secure additional capital or enter into a strategic transaction and implement our strategy~~depends, or in ~~the~~large ~~event~~part, ofon the ~~imposition~~financing, ~~of significant additional regulatory burdens or delays or a significant deterioration of the market for rare earth products~~licensing, ~~our ability to develop a sustainable or profitable business would be materially adversely affected. If the Bear Lodge REE Project does not proceed~~permitting, ~~then~~development ~~the~~and ~~viability~~operation of ~~the Company may depend upon the ability to process REE from sources other than~~ our Bear Lodge REE Project, ~~using~~which ~~our proprietary technology assuming the technology~~ is ~~successfully~~our ~~proven~~only ~~through~~rare ~~the~~earth ~~operation of the Demonstration Plant~~project.

Our only rare earth project at this time is the Bear Lodge REE Project. Our continued viability is based, in large part, on successfully implementing our strategy, including completion of a FS, licensing, permitting and construction of a mine and processing and/or beneficiation facilities in a reasonable timeframe. If we are unable to secure additional capital or enter into a strategic transaction and implement our strategy, or in the event of the imposition of significant additional regulatory burdens or delays or a significant deterioration of the market for rare earth products, our ability to develop a sustainable or profitable business would be materially adversely affected. If the Bear Lodge REE Project does not proceed, then the viability of the Company may depend upon the ability to process REE from sources other than our Bear Lodge REE Project using our proprietary technology assuming the technology is successfully proven through the operation of the Demonstration Plant.

Increased costs could affect our ability to bring the Bear Lodge REE Project into production and, once in production, to be profitable.

We estimated the initial capital costs required to bring the Bear Lodge REE Project into commercial production in our historical PFS, dated October 9, 2014, at approximately $290,000. We did not evaluate the capital cost estimates in our 2024 TRS or Technical Report for the Bear Lodge REE Project. Our FS, if and when completed, ~~could~~is ~~suggest~~expected ~~that~~to show our estimated costs ~~may~~will be materially higher than those we previously anticipated, which could make it more difficult to finance the Bear Lodge REE Project or to successfully establish mining operations.

We anticipate that our future operating costs at the Bear Lodge REE Project will vary from year to year due to a number of factors, such as changing grade, metallurgy, and revisions to mine plans in response to the physical shape and location of the ore body. In addition, costs are affected by the price of commodities such as oil, gas, reagents/chemicals, steel, rubber, and electricity. Such commodities are at times subject to volatile price movements, including increases that could make production less profitable or not profitable at all. A material increase in costs could also impact our ability to commence or maintain future development of mining operations.

A future pandemic may have an adverse impact on our business.

A future pandemic or similar public health issues, as seen in the COVID-19 pandemic, could have a material adverse effect on our ability to raise capital, construct or operate our Demonstration Plant, mine, or production facility, or execute our business plans. In addition, preventive measures we may voluntarily put in place may have a material adverse effect on our business for an indefinite period of time, such as decreased employee or contractor availability, unavailability of needed products or services, or disruptions to the businesses of our contracted service providers and others. Our suppliers may also face these and other challenges, which could lead to a disruption or delay in their services. Any pandemic and resulting economic slowdown may also impact the supply and demand for rare earths domestically and globally. Although these disruptions may continue to occur, the long-term economic impact and near-term financial impacts of a pandemic, its ongoing variants, and other possible public health threats cannot be reasonably estimated at this time due to the uncertainty of future developments.

We expect to rely on our proprietary technology and processes to further our Bear Lodge REE Project.

We rely on a combination of trade secret protection, nondisclosure agreements, trademarks, and patents to establish and protect our proprietary intellectual property rights in our rare earth technology. As of December 31, ~~2023~~2024, we had on file U.S. provisional patent applications relating to processing methods, including (i) selective recovery of REEs from mixed chloride leach solutions using oxalic acid, and (ii) separation of thorium from bulk REEs in a solvent extraction (“SX”) process. These provisional applications provided the basis for the current patent portfolio, which includes two issued U.S. patents and one pending U.S. divisional patent application, and fifteen issued foreign patents across thirteen foreign jurisdictions. The issued U.S. patents have a term of 20 years measured from the filing date of the utility patent applications. We licensed our intellectual property, including patents and related technical information, to Synchron in October 2017, and the license became exclusive to Synchron and its affiliates in October 2019. ~~See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Annual Report.~~ Several of these technologies have potential value for application in other industries, and the Company is evaluating this potential. The success of our business depends, in part, on our ability to utilize our proprietary process technologies, and we could encounter unforeseen problems or costs, or both, in scaling up our technologies to commercial applications.

Table of Contents

depends, in part, on our ability to utilize our proprietary process technologies, and we could encounter unforeseen problems or costs, or both, in scaling up our technologies to commercial applications.

Our mineral resource estimate may be inaccurate and any material change in this estimate could affect the viability of placing our property into production.

In March 2024, the Company announced the completion of a new mineral resource estimate based on maximizing the recovery of lanthanum (La) and the key magnet materials of neodymium (Nd), praseodymium (Pr), terbium (Tb), and dysprosium (Dy). The estimate was focused on the Bull Hill deposit at the Bear Lodge REE Project with long-term upside existing in the Carbon, Whitetail, and Taylor deposits. Unless otherwise indicated, our mineral resources are based upon estimates made by independent geologists. When making determinations about whether to advance the Bear Lodge REE Project to development, we must rely upon such estimated calculations as to the quantity and grades of mineralization contained in the property. Until mineralized material is actually mined and processed, mineral resources and grades of such mineralization must be considered estimates only, which may prove to be unreliable. Because we have not completed a FS on the Bear Lodge REE Project and have not commenced actual production, the mineral resource estimate for the Bear Lodge REE Project may require adjustments or downward revisions. In addition, the grade of material ultimately mined, if any, may differ from that indicated in our mineral resource estimate or in future feasibility studies. Our mineral resource estimate has been determined based on assumed cut-off grades that depend upon estimated REE prices and recovery rates. Any significant increase in cut-off grades could reduce our estimates of mineralization, or the amount of mineralization to be extracted, and could have a material adverse effect on our share price and the value of our Bear Lodge REE Project.

The historical mineral resource estimates for our ~~Projects~~Sundance Gold Project are not considered current, need to be updated, and should not be relied upon.

The ~~2014 and~~ 2011 historical mineral resource estimates for our ~~Projects~~Sundance Gold Project have not been ~~fully~~ updated and, as such, should not be relied upon ~~as they may be updated prior to further feasibility work~~. Furthermore, the TRS of 2024 did not evaluate the economics of the Bear Lodge REE Project or capital requirements. Accordingly, the previous mineral resource estimates from 2014 and 2011 for the Bear Lodge REE Project and the Sundance Gold Project, respectively, will require further updating and should not be relied upon. The ~~Bear Lodge REE Project has been under care-and-maintenance since 2016, and the~~ Sundance Gold Project is in the early exploration stage and has been on hold since 2014. ~~Additionally, it is too early to estimate resources or the gold production potential of the Sundance Gold Project.~~ We have not done sufficient work to classify the historical mineral estimates for our ~~Projects~~Sundance Gold Project as a current ~~estimates~~estimate of mineral resources, and we are not treating the historical mineral resource estimates as current estimates of mineral resources.

We depend on key personnel, and the absence of any of these individuals could adversely affect our business.

Our success is currently largely dependent on the performance, retention and abilities of our directors, President and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), ~~Chief~~other ~~Financial~~officers ~~Officer (“CFO”)~~ and ~~certain consultants~~personnel. The loss of the services of these persons could have a material adverse effect on our business and prospects. On January 2, 2024, Mr. Berg notified the Company of his decision to resign as the President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director of the Company, in each case effective as of April 2, 2024, unless sooner terminated by the Company. On March 14, 2024, the Company and Mr. Berg agreed that such resignations would take effect on March 20, 2024. Also on March 14, 2024, the Board appointed (i) Kelli Kast, a current director of the Company, as the interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, in each case effective as of March 20, 2024, and (ii) Kenneth Mushinski as the President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director of the Company, in each case effective as of May 1, 2024. There is no assurance that we can maintain the services of our directors, CEO, ~~CFO~~other officers, or other qualified personnel and consultants required to operate our business. Failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on us and our prospects. We do not maintain life insurance policies on our employees, directors, or consultants.

U.S. investors may not be able to enforce their civil liabilities against us or our directors, controlling persons and officers.

It may be difficult to bring and enforce suits against us. We are incorporated in the province of British Columbia, Canada under the BCBCA. Some of our directors may be residents of Canada, and a substantial portion of their assets are located outside of the U.S. As a result, it may be difficult for U.S. holders of our common shares to effect service of process on these persons within the U.S. or to recover in the U.S. on judgments rendered against them. In addition, a shareholder should not assume that the courts of Canada (i) would enforce judgments of U.S. courts obtained in actions against us or such persons predicated upon the civil liability provisions of the U.S. federal securities laws or other laws of the U.S., or (ii) would enforce, in original actions, liabilities against us or such persons predicated upon the U.S. federal securities laws or other laws of the U.S.

Table of Contents

~~should~~We ~~not~~believe ~~assume~~ that ~~the~~we ~~courts~~were ofa ~~Canada~~“passive ~~(i) would~~foreign ~~enforce~~investment ~~judgments~~company” of(“PFIC”) ~~U.S.~~for ~~courts obtained in actions against us or such persons predicated upon~~ the year ~~civil~~ended ~~liability~~December 31, ~~provisions~~2024, ofand ~~the~~could ~~U.S.~~be ~~federal~~a ~~securities~~PFIC ~~laws~~in ~~or other laws of the U.S., or (ii)~~subsequent ~~would enforce~~years, inwhich ~~original~~could ~~actions,~~have ~~liabilities~~adverse ~~against us or such persons predicated upon the~~ U.S. federal ~~securities~~income ~~laws~~tax orconsequences ~~other~~for ~~laws of the~~ U.S. shareholders.

WeAn investor in our common shares that is a U.S. taxpayer (referred to as a U.S. shareholder) should be aware that we believe that we were a ~~“passive~~PFIC ~~foreign~~for ~~investment~~the ~~company”~~year (“ended December 31, 2024. We also expect that we will be a PFIC”) for the year ~~ended~~ending December 31, ~~2023,~~2025 and ~~could~~that we may be a PFIC in subsequent years. The tests for determining PFIC status are dependent upon a number of factors, some of which ~~could~~are ~~have~~beyond ~~adverse~~our control and can be subject to uncertainties. Accordingly, we cannot provide certainty that we were or were not a PFIC for the year ended December 31, 2024, or that we will or will not be a PFIC for the year ending December 31, 2025, or for any future year. We will use commercially reasonable efforts to provide information regarding our status as a PFIC, and the PFIC status of any subsidiary in which the Company owns more than 50% of such subsidiary’s total aggregate voting power, to U.S. shareholders who make a written request for such information. Adverse rules apply to U.S. shareholders who own our common shares if we are a PFIC. Each U.S. shareholder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, ~~income~~U.S. federal alternative minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, and U.S. state and local tax consequences of the PFIC rules and the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of our common shares if we are or become a PFIC. For additional information regarding PFIC tax consequences, see “Part II, Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities—Certain U.S. ~~shareholders.~~Federal Income Tax Considerations—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules.”

An investor in our common shares that is a U.S. taxpayer (referred to as a U.S. shareholder) should be aware that we believe that we were a PFIC for the year ended December 31, 2023. We also expect that we will be a PFIC for the year ending December 31, 2024 and that we may be a PFIC in subsequent years. The tests for determining PFIC status are dependent upon a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control and can be subject to uncertainties. Accordingly, we cannot provide certainty that we were or were not a PFIC for the year ended December 31, 2023, or that we will or will not be a PFIC for the year ending December 31, 2024, or for any future year. We will use commercially reasonable efforts to provide information regarding our status as a PFIC, and the PFIC status of any subsidiary in which the Company owns more than 50% of such subsidiary’s total aggregate voting power, to U.S. shareholders who make a written request for such information. Adverse rules apply to U.S. shareholders who own our common shares if we are a PFIC. Each U.S. shareholder should consult its own tax advisor regarding the U.S. federal, U.S. federal alternative minimum, U.S. federal estate and gift, and U.S. state and local tax consequences of the PFIC rules and the acquisition, ownership, and disposition of our common shares if we are or become a PFIC. For additional information regarding PFIC tax consequences, see “Part II, Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities—Certain U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations—Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules.”

Risks Related to the Mineral Exploration, Development and Mining Industries

We may be adversely affected by fluctuations in demand for, and prices of, rare earth products.

Because our primary focus ~~currently~~ is currently the advancement and development of athe Demonstration Plant and ultimately the Bear Lodge REE Project, changes in demand for, and the market price of, REE products could significantly affect our ability to develop or finance the Bear Lodge REE Project, and eventually attain commercial production or profitability. REE product prices may fluctuate and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control such as interest rates, exchange rates, inflation or deflation, fluctuation in the relative value of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies on the world market, global and regional supply, and demand for REE products, and the political and economic conditions of countries that produce and use REEs. Protracted periods of low prices for REE products could significantly reduce our ability to develop the Bear Lodge REE Project and, if we attain commercial production, to maintain profitable operations.

Demand for REE products is impacted by demand for downstream products incorporating rare earths, including hybrid and electric vehicles, wind power equipment and other clean technology products, as well as demand in the general automotive and electronics industries. Lack of growth in these markets or the introduction of substitute products could adversely affect the demand for REE products, which would have a material adverse effect on our Bear Lodge REE Project and our business. In contrast, periods of high REE prices are generally beneficial to us; however, strong REE prices, as well as real or perceived disruptions in the supply of REE, also create economic pressure to identify or create non-REE alternate technologies that ultimately could reduce future long-term demand for REE products, and at the same time, may incentivize the development of otherwise marginal mining properties or the development of new, lower cost sources of supply that could reduce or eliminate the market for REEs altogether. For example, automobile manufacturers have announced plans to develop motors for electric and hybrid cars that do not require REE products due to concerns about the available supply of REEs. If the automobile industry or other industries reduce their reliance on rare earth products, the resulting change in demand could have a material adverse effect on our business. In particular, if prices or demand for REEs were to decline, our share price would likely decline, and this could also impair our ability to obtain the funding needed for our operations and our ability to find purchasers for our products at prices acceptable to us or at all.

An increase in the global supply of rare earth products, dumping and/or predatory pricing by our competitors may materially and adversely affect our ability to raise capital, develop our Bear Lodge REE Project or operate profitably.

Table of Contents

Anrefined ~~increase~~product in 2024. China also dominates the ~~global~~manufacture of metals, NdFeB magnets and other products from REEs. The threat of increased competition may lead our competitors to engage in predatory pricing behavior or manipulation of the available supply of ~~rare~~REEs. ~~earth~~Advanced technology in recycling REEs may also impact supply and prices. Any increase in the amount of REE products, ~~dumping~~exported from other nations and/ increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced margins, or ~~predatory~~loss ~~pricing~~of bypotential ~~our~~market ~~competitors~~share, ~~may~~any of which could materially adversely affect our ~~ability~~business. toAs ~~raise~~a ~~capital~~result of these factors, ~~develop~~we ~~our~~may ~~Bear~~not ~~Lodge~~be ~~REE~~able ~~Project~~to orcompete ~~operate~~effectively ~~profitably~~against our future competitors.

The pricing and demand for REE products is affected by a number of factors beyond our control, including growth of economic development and the global supply and demand for REE products. REE supply markets continue to be dominated by production from China, which produced an estimated 63% of the global REE mine production and 84% of refined product in 2023. China also dominates the manufacture of metals, NdFeB magnets and other products from REEs. The threat of increased competition may lead our competitors to engage in predatory pricing behavior or manipulation of the available supply of REEs. Advanced technology in recycling REEs may also impact supply and prices. Any increase in the amount of REE products exported from other nations and increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced margins, or loss of potential market share, any of which could materially adversely affect our business. As a result of these factors, we may not be able to compete effectively against our future competitors.

The success of our business may depend, in part, on the establishment of new uses and markets for rare earth products.

The success of our business may depend, in part, on the establishment of new markets by us or third parties for certain rare earth products. Although we plan to produce rare earth products for use in end-products such as NdFeB magnets, which are used in critical existing and emerging technologies (hybrid and electric vehicles, wind power turbines, oil refining catalysts and compact fluorescent lighting), the success of our business may depend on the creation of new markets in addition to the successful commercialization of REE products in existing and emerging markets. Any unexpected costs or delays in the commercialization of any of the foregoing products or applications could have a material adverse effect on our ability to develop our Bear Lodge REE Project or operate our business profitably.

We are subject to significant governmental regulations, including permitting, licensing and approval processes, that affect our operations and could impact the cost and timing of conducting our business.

Our current and future activities will be governed by laws and regulations, including the following, among others:

●

laws and regulations governing mineral concession acquisition, prospecting, development, mining, processing, production, and decommissioning;

●

laws and regulations related to exports, taxes, and fees;

●

labor standards and regulations related to occupational health and mine safety;

● laws and regulations relating to environmental protections concerning, among other things, waste management, greenhouse gas emissions, transportation, and disposal of toxic and radioactive substances, land use, water, air, and the protection of threatened and endangered species.

We believe that we hold, or are in the process of obtaining, all licenses and permits necessary to carry on the activities that we currently are conducting or propose to conduct in the near term under applicable laws and regulations. Such licenses and permits are subject to changes in regulations and changes in various operating circumstances. There can be no guarantee that we will be able to obtain all necessary licenses and permits that may be required tofor ~~maintain~~future ~~the current or planned~~ exploration, development and mining activities, including constructing mines and/or processing and/or beneficiation facilities, and commencing operations at the Bear Lodge REE Project. In addition, if we proceed to production on the Bear Lodge REE Project, we will be required to obtain and comply with permits and licenses that may contain specific operating or other conditions. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain such permits and licenses or that we will be able to comply with any such conditions. Our Sundance Gold Project, previously in the exploration stage, but on hold since 2014, does not have any of the permits or licenses that would be necessary to carry on further activities on the project. Costs related to applying for and obtaining permits and licenses may be prohibitive and could delay planned exploration and development activities. Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permitting and licensing requirements may result in enforcement actions, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment or remedial actions.

Parties engaged in mining operations may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage relating to mining activities and may be subject to civil or criminal liability, fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations. Amendments to current laws, regulations and permits governing operations and activities of mining companies, or more stringent implementation thereof, could have a material adverse impact on our operations, cause increases in capital expenditures or production costs, or require abandonment or delays in the exploration or the development of either of our projects.

Table of Contents

regulations. Amendments to current laws, regulations and permits governing operations and activities of mining companies, or more stringent implementation thereof, could have a material adverse impact on our operations, cause increases in capital expenditures or production costs, or require abandonment or delays in the exploration or the development of either of our Projects.

Our activities are subject to environmental risks and compliance with environmental laws and regulations that are increasing and costly.

Our business is subject to environmental regulation in the jurisdictions in which we operate. Environmental laws and regulations at the local, state, and federal level could evolve in a manner that may impose stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects, and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors, and employees. These laws address, among other issues, emissions into the air, discharges into water, management of waste and hazardous substances, protection of natural resources, antiquities, endangered species, and reclamation of lands disturbed by mining operations. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations at the local, state, and federal level and future changes in these laws and regulations may require significant capital outlays and may cause material changes or delays in our current and planned operations and future activities. It is possible that future changes in these laws or regulations could have a significant adverse impact on our ~~Projects~~projects or some portion of our business, causing us to reevaluate those activities at that time.

Examples of some of the current U.S. federal laws that may affect our business and planned operations include, but are not limited to, the following:

● NEPA requires federal agencies to integrate environmental considerations into their decision-making processes by evaluating the environmental impacts of proposed actions, including issuance of permits to mining facilities, and assessing alternatives to those actions. Under NEPA, a federal agency must prepare an EIS detailing the environmental impacts of “major federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment.” The EPA will, and other federal agencies and any interested third parties can, review and comment on the scope of an EIS and the adequacy of and findings set forth in a draft and final EIS.

● We began, in 2012, to undertake the NEPA process for the Bear Lodge REE Project with the USFS as the lead agency. However, in 2016, we placed the Bear Lodge REE Project under care-and-maintenance, and all permitting and licensing activities were suspended, including the EIS process. The NEPA process can cause delays in issuance of required permits or result in changes to a project to mitigate potential environmental impacts, which in turn can impact the economic feasibility of a proposed project, including the ability to construct or operate the Bear Lodge REE Project or other projects entirely.

●

The NRC, pursuant to its authority under the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the “Atomic Energy Act”), oversees the regulatory framework governing the control of radioactive materials, including processing and/or beneficiation of REE that contain radioactive source materials such as uranium and thorium. The NRC is responsible for issuing licenses for source material involving concentrations of uranium or thorium that exceed 0.05% by weight. If a proposed action, including waste generation, results in materials with concentrations of uranium and thorium that equal or exceed 0.05% by weight, a license to receive title to, possess, use, transfer, or deliver source and byproduct materials may be required. As our operations are expected to exceed this concentration, we are required to follow the regulations pertaining to a license application for the Demonstration Plant project and the Bear Lodge REE Project. The Demonstration Plant project received the necessary NRC license in the third quarter of 2023. The licensing process, including NEPA review relating to the NRC licensing, when initiated for the Bear Lodge REE Project may cause delays or result in changes to the Bear Lodge REE Project design to mitigate impacts as required under the license.

● Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended (“CERCLA”) and similar state laws, responsibility for the entire cost of cleanup of a contaminated site, as well as natural resource damages, can be imposed upon current or former site owners or operators, or upon any party who released one or more designated “hazardous substances” at the site, regardless of the lawfulness of the original activities that led to the contamination or whether the owner or operator caused or knew of the release. CERCLA also authorizes the EPA and, in some cases, third parties to take actions in response to threats to public health or the environment and to seek to recover from the potentially responsible parties the costs of such actions. We may also be an owner or operator of facilities at which hazardous substances have been released by previous owners or operators. We may be responsible under CERCLA for all or part of the costs of cleaning up facilities at which such substances have been released and for natural resource damages. We have not, to our knowledge, been identified as a potentially responsible party under CERCLA, nor are we aware of any prior owners or operators of our properties that have been so identified with respect to their ownership or operation of those properties.

Table of Contents

or operators. We may be responsible under CERCLA for all or part of the costs of cleaning up facilities at which such substances have been released and for natural resource damages. We have not, to our knowledge, been identified as a potentially responsible party under CERCLA, nor are we aware of any prior owners or operators of our properties that have been so identified with respect to their ownership or operation of those properties.

●

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, as amended (“RCRA”), and comparable state statutes, regulate the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of “solid” and “hazardous” waste and authorize the imposition of substantial fines and penalties for noncompliance, as well as requirements for corrective actions. Although certain mining, mineral processing and/or beneficiation wastes currently are exempt from regulation as hazardous wastes under RCRA, the EPA has limited the disposal options for certain wastes designated as hazardous wastes under RCRA. It is possible that certain wastes generated by our potential future operations that currently are exempt from regulation may in the future be designated as hazardous wastes and may therefore become subject to more rigorous and costly management, disposal, and clean-up requirements.

●

The Clean Air Act, as amended (“CAA”), and comparable state statutes, restricts the emission of air pollutants from many stationary and mobile sources, including mining, processing and/or beneficiation activities. Our planned mining operations may produce air emissions, including fugitive dust and other air pollutants, from stationary equipment, storage facilities, and the use of mobile sources such as trucks and heavy construction equipment that are subject to review, monitoring, control requirements and emission limits under the CAA and state air quality laws. New facilities may be required to obtain permits before work can begin, and existing facilities may be required to incur capital costs to remain in compliance. In addition, permitting and licensing rules and issued permits may impose limitations on production levels or result in additional capital expenditures to comply with such rules or permits. In certain circumstances, private citizens may also sue sources of pollutants for alleged violations of the CAA.

●

The Clean Water Act, as amended (“CWA”), and comparable state statutes impose restrictions and controls on the discharge of pollutants into waters of the U.S. The discharge of pollutants into regulated waters is prohibited, except in accordance with the terms of a permit issued by the EPA or an analogous state agency. These controls generally have become more stringent over time, and it is possible that additional restrictions will be imposed in the future. Violation of the CWA and similar state regulatory programs can result in civil, criminal, and administrative penalties for unauthorized discharges of hazardous substances and other pollutants. They also can impose substantial liability for the costs of removal or remediation associated with such discharges. The CWA also requires a discharge permit for certain activities and requires the implementation of a Pollution Prevention Plan establishing best management practices, training, periodic monitoring of covered activities, and monitoring and sampling of stormwater run-off. The CWA and regulations implemented thereunder also prohibit discharges of dredged and fill material in wetlands and other waters of the U.S. unless authorized by a permit issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.

●

The Safe Drinking Water Act, as amended (“SDWA”), and the Underground Injection Control (“UIC”) program promulgated thereunder regulate the drilling and operation of subsurface injection wells. The program requires that a permit be obtained before drilling a disposal well. The EPA directly administers the UIC program in some states, and in others the responsibility for certain aspects of the program has been delegated to the state. Violation of these regulations and/or contamination of groundwater by mining related activities may result in fines, penalties, and/or remediation costs, among other sanctions and liabilities under the SDWA and state laws.

●

The Endangered Species Act (“ESA”) regulates activities that could have an adverse effect on threatened and endangered species, including the habitat and ecosystems upon which they depend. The ESA protects threatened and endangered species primarily by prohibiting the unauthorized “taking” of listed species, which includes harassing or harming members of such species or significantly modifying their habitat. The ESA also requires consultation with other agencies in certain circumstances. Compliance with ESA requirements can significantly delay, limit, or even prevent the development of projects, including the development of mining claims, and can also result in increased development costs. In addition, the ESA authorized both civil and criminal penalties for ESA violations and authorizes citizen suits against any person alleged to be in violation of the ESA.

Regulations and pending legislation governing issues involving climate change could result in increased operating costs that could have a material adverse effect on our business.

A number of governments or governmental bodies have adopted or are contemplating regulatory changes in response to the potential impact of climate change. In the U.S., on December 15, 2009, the EPA published its findings that emissions of carbon dioxide, methane and other GHGs present an endangerment to public health and the environment because emissions of such gases are, according to the EPA, contributing to the warming of the earth’s atmosphere and other climate changes. Based on these findings, the EPA has developed and implemented regulations that restrict GHG emissions under existing provisions of the CAA, including one rule that limits GHG emissions from motor vehicles beginning with the

Table of Contents

of carbon dioxide, methane and other GHGs present an endangerment to public health and the environment because emissions of such gases are, according to the EPA, contributing to the warming of the earth’s atmosphere and other climate changes. Based on these findings, the EPA has developed and implemented regulations that restrict GHG emissions under existing provisions of the CAA, including one rule that limits GHG emissions from motor vehicles beginning with the 2012 model year. The EPA has asserted that these final motor vehicle GHG emission standards trigger the CAA construction and operating permit requirements for stationary sources, commencing when the motor vehicle standards took effect on January 2, 2011. On June 3, 2010, the EPA published its final rule to address the permitting of GHG emissions from stationary sources under the Prevention of Significant Deterioration (“PSD”) and Title V permitting programs. This rule “tailored” these permitting programs to apply to certain stationary sources of GHG emissions in a multi-step process, with the largest sources first subject to permitting. However, based on a decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, only facilities already required to obtain PSD permits for other criteria pollutants must also reduce GHG emissions that exceed certain thresholds consistent with guidance for determining “best available control technology” standards for GHG, which guidance was published by the EPA in November 2010.

In addition, both houses of Congress have considered legislation to reduce GHG emissions and many states have already taken legal measures to reduce GHG emissions, primarily through the development of GHG inventories, GHG emission fees, GHG permitting and/or regional GHG “cap and trade” programs. Most of these “cap and trade” programs work by requiring major sources of emissions to acquire and surrender emission allowances, with the number of allowances available for purchase reduced each year until the overall GHG emission-reduction goal is achieved. The current U.S. presidential administration has made climate change legislation and regulation a priority, which increases the likelihood of increased regulation of GHG emissions. Although the U.S. had withdrawn from the Paris Agreement, the U.S. formally rejoined the Paris Agreement in February 2021, and, in April 2021, the Biden Administration set an economy-wide target of reducing its net greenhouse gas emissions by 50-52% below 2005 levels in 2030. With the U.S. recommitting to the Paris Agreement, additional executive orders may be issued, or federal legislation or regulatory initiatives may be adopted to achieve the Paris Agreement’s goals.

Legislation and increased regulation regarding climate change could impose significant costs on us and/or our suppliers, including costs related to increased energy requirements, capital equipment, environmental monitoring, and reporting and/or other costs to comply with such regulations. Any adopted future climate change regulations could also negatively impact our ability to compete with companies situated in areas not subject to such regulations. Alternatively, climate change legislation could potentially benefit our business by driving demand for products utilizing rare earth containing products. We cannot predict how legislation and regulation will affect our financial condition, operating performance, or ability to compete. Even without such regulation, increased awareness, or any adverse publicity in the global marketplace about the rare earth industry’s potential impacts on the environment could harm our reputation and business. The potential physical impacts of climate change on our operations are highly uncertain and would be particular to the geographic circumstances in the areas in which we operate. These may include changes in precipitation, storm patterns and intensities, water shortages and changing temperatures. These factors may have an adverse impact on the cost, production, or financial performance of our operations.

A shortage of equipment and supplies could adversely affect our ability to operate our business.

We currently do and likely will depend on various supplies and equipment to carry out our activities, including those for the Demonstration Plant, and, if warranted, future exploration, development, mining, and processing operations. A shortage of such supplies, equipment or parts could have a material adverse effect on our ability to carry out our planned activities or increase our operating costs and expenses.

Mineral exploration and development and mining are potentially hazardous and subject to conditions or events beyond our control, which could have a material adverse effect on our business or plans.

Mineral exploration, development and mining involve various types of risks and hazards, including, but not limited to, the following:

●

environmental hazards;

●

power outages;

Table of Contents

●

metallurgical and other processing problems;

●

unusual or unexpected geological formations or conditions;

●

personal injury, flooding, fire, explosions, cave-ins, earthquakes, landslides, and rock-bursts;

●

mineral exploration, transportation, or mining accidents;

●

concentrate losses;

●

fluctuations in exploration, development, and production costs;

●

labor disputes;

●

supply interruptions;

●

unanticipated variations in grade;

Table of Contents

●

mechanical equipment failure;

●

periodic interruptions due to inclement or hazardous weather conditions; and

●

regulatory delays, curtailments, or shutdowns.

These risks could result in damage to, or destruction of, mineral properties, production equipment, facilities or other properties, personal injury, environmental damage, delays in mining, increased production costs, monetary losses, or possible legal liability. We may not be able to obtain insurance to cover these risks at economically feasible premiums or at all. Insurance against certain environmental risks, including potential liability for pollution or other hazards resulting from the disposal of waste products from production, may be prohibitively expensive or not available. Any losses we incur related to any significant events that are not covered by insurance policies may have a material adverse effect on our business.

Mineral exploration and development is highly speculative, and certain inherent risks could have a negative effect on our business.

Our long-term success depends primarily on our ability to develop mineral deposits on existing properties that can be developed into commercially viable mining operations. Resource exploration is a highly speculative business, characterized by a number of significant risks, including, among other things, unprofitable efforts resulting not only from the failure to discover mineral deposits but from finding mineral deposits which, though present, are insufficient in quantity and quality to return a profit from production. Substantial expenditures are required to establish proven and probable mineral reserves through drilling and analysis, to develop metallurgical processes to extract metal, and to develop the mining, processing and/or beneficiation facilities and infrastructure at any site chosen for mining. The marketability of minerals discovered by us may be affected by numerous factors that are beyond our control and cannot be accurately predicted, such as market pricing fluctuations, the proximity and capacity of milling facilities, mineral markets demand, available supply and processing equipment, and other factors such as government regulations, including regulations relating to royalties, allowable production, importing and exporting of minerals, and environmental protection. Any one or a combination of these factors may result in a failure to receive an adequate return on our investment capital. The decision to abandon a project may have a material adverse effect on the market value of our common shares or our ability to complete future financings.

Title to our Bear Lodge Property may be subject to other claims, or we may lose our interest in our claims, which could affect our property rights and claims.

There are risks that title to our Bear Lodge Property may be challenged or impugned. Our Bear Lodge Property is located in the state of Wyoming and may be subject to prior unrecorded agreements, transfers or native land claims, and title may be affected by undetected defects. There may be valid challenges to the title of our Bear Lodge Property which, if successful, could impair or result in the cessation of development and/or operations.

The vast majority of the mineral rights to our Bear Lodge Property consist of “unpatented” mining claims created and maintained in accordance with the U.S. General Mining Act of 1872 (“U.S. General Mining Law”). Unpatented mining claims are unique property interests and are generally considered to be subject to greater title risk than are other real property interests because the validity of unpatented mining claims can be uncertain. This uncertainty arises, in part, out of the complex federal and state laws and regulations an owner of an unpatented mining claim must comply with to locate and maintain a valid claim. Also, unpatented mining claims are always subject to possible challenges by third parties or validity contests by the federal government. The validity of an unpatented mining claim, in terms of both its location and its maintenance, is dependent on strict compliance with not only a complex body of U.S. federal and state statutory law, but also administrative and judicial decisions interpreting those statutes and case law. In addition, there may be limitations as to the completeness of public records that determine prior claimants that could impact the validity or ownership of unpatented mining claims. The Company’s right to continue activities on the Bear Lodge Property is dependent upon our ability to pay annual claim maintenance fees.

Table of Contents

validity contests by the federal government. The validity of an unpatented mining claim, in terms of both its location and its maintenance, is dependent on strict compliance with not only a complex body of U.S. federal and state statutory law, but also administrative and judicial decisions interpreting those statutes and case law. In addition, there may be limitations as to the completeness of public records that determine prior claimants that could impact the validity or ownership of unpatented mining claims. The Company’s right to continue activities on the Bear Lodge Property is dependent upon our ability to pay annual claim maintenance fees.

Our operations are subject to significant uninsured risks that could negatively impact future profitability as we maintain limited insurance against our operations.

Any exploration or operation of our Bear Lodge Property will entail certain risks, including unexpected or unusual operating conditions, such as rockslides, cave-ins, flooding, fire, and earthquakes. It is not always possible to insure against these risks. Should events such as these arise, they could reduce or eliminate our assets and shareholder equity as well as result in increased costs and/or a decline in the value of our assets or common shares. We expect to maintain general liability, director and officer insurance, and some insurance against our assets but not with the expectation of full replacement value. We may decide to update or amend our insurance portfolio in the future if coverage is available at economically viable rates.

Increased competition could adversely affect our ability to attract necessary capital funding.

The mining industry is intensely competitive, and we must compete with other individuals and companies, many of which have greater financial resources, operational experience, and technical capabilities than we have. This competition from other mining companies could adversely impact our efforts to hire experienced mining professionals. Competition for resources at all levels can be very intense, particularly affecting the availability of manpower, drill rigs, mining equipment and production equipment. Increased competition could adversely affect our ability to attract necessary capital funding or attract or retain key personnel or outside technical resources.

Land reclamation requirements for our properties may be burdensome or expensive.

Although land reclamation requirements vary depending on the location and governing authority, such requirements generally are imposed on mineral exploration companies as well as companies with mining and processing operations to minimize long-term effects of land disturbance.

Reclamation requirements may include the following, among other things:

●

control dispersion of potentially deleterious effluents;

●

manage and control mine tailings and other processing wastes;

●

reduce open pit mine slope angles;

●

treat ground and surface water to drinking water standards; and

●

reasonably re-establish pre-disturbance vegetation and land forms.

To carry out reclamation obligations imposed on us in connection with the potential future development activities at the Demonstration Plant and the Bear Lodge Property, we must allocate financial resources that might otherwise be spent on further exploration and future development programs. We have set up a provision for reclamation obligations as currently anticipated for exploration completed on the Bear Lodge Property, as appropriate, but this provision may not be adequate. If we are required to carry out unanticipated reclamation work, our financial position could be adversely affected.

Legislation and regulations have been proposed that would significantly affect the mining industry and our business.

The U.S. Congress from time to time has considered proposed revisions to the U.S. General Mining Law. If Congress again considers and enacts any such revisions, such legislation could change the cost of holding unpatented mining claims or significantly impact our ability to develop mineralized resources on unpatented mining claims. Changes in the U.S. presidential administration or changes in the composition of Congress from time to time may increase the likelihood that Congress considers such revisions at some point. Past bills have proposed, among other things, to (i) impose a federal royalty on production from unpatented mining claims, (ii) impose a fee on the amount of material displaced at a mine, (iii) impose time limits on the effectiveness of plans of operation that may not coincide with mine life, (iv) impose more stringent environmental compliance and reclamation requirements on activities on unpatented mining claims, (v) establish a mechanism that would allow states, localities and Native American tribes to petition for the withdrawal of identified tracts of federal land from the operation of the U.S. General Mining Law, (vi) replace the location of mining claims with federal leases for locatable minerals, and (vii) allow for administrative determinations that mining would not be allowed where undue degradation of the federal lands in question could not be prevented. Although we cannot predict what

Table of Contents

royalty on production from unpatented mining claims, (ii) impose a fee on the amount of material displaced at a mine, (iii) impose time limits on the effectiveness of plans of operation that may not coincide with mine life, (iv) impose more stringent environmental compliance and reclamation requirements on activities on unpatented mining claims, (v) establish a mechanism that would allow states, localities and Native American tribes to petition for the withdrawal of identified tracts of federal land from the operation of the U.S. General Mining Law, (vi) replace the location of mining claims with federal leases for locatable minerals, and (vii) allow for administrative determinations that mining would not be allowed where undue degradation of the federal lands in question could not be prevented. Although we cannot predict what legislated royalties might be, the enactment of a federal royalty or other provisions contained in any such proposed bills could adversely affect the potential for development of our unpatented mining claims, our ability to operate, or our financial performance. The effect of any proposed revision of the U.S. General Mining Law on operations cannot be determined until enactment. However, it is possible that revisions would materially increase the carrying and operating costs of mineral properties located on federal unpatented mining claims.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

We may elect to deregister our common shares under the Exchange Act. Deregistration would result in less disclosure about us and may negatively affect the liquidity and trading prices of our common shares.

Due to the relatively high cost of being a public company in the U.S., our Board of Directors may elect to voluntarily deregister our common shares under the Exchange Act and suspend our reporting obligations in the U.S., possibly in combination with an effort to list our common shares on a securities exchange other than the OTCQB Venture Marketplace. No Board approval of deregistration has taken place, but in the future, the Board may authorize the Company to file with the SEC a Form 15 to voluntarily deregister our common shares under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act and suspend our reporting obligations under Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. If the Board approves such deregistration, we would file a Form 15 and our obligations to file periodic reports, such as annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K, would be suspended immediately upon the filing of the Form 15 with the SEC, and our proxy statement, Section 16 and other Section 12(g) reporting responsibilities would terminate effective 90 days after the filing of the Form 15. We believe that we are eligible to deregister under the Exchange Act. If we were to file a Form 15, we expect that our common shares, which currently trade on the OTCQB Venture Marketplace, would not continue to be quoted on the OTCQB Venture Marketplace. Following any deregistration, we would not expect to publish periodic financial information or furnish such information to our shareholders except as may be required by applicable laws, including Canadian securities laws, or stock exchange rules. As a result of the foregoing factors, deregistration may result in less disclosure about us and may negatively affect the liquidity and trading prices of our common shares.

We do not currently intend to pay cash dividends.

We have not declared any dividends since our incorporation and do not anticipate that we will do so in the foreseeable future. Our present policy is to retain all available funds for use in our business development and operations. Payment of future cash dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects and other factors that the Board of Directors considers relevant. In the absence of dividends, investors will only see a return on their investment if the value of our common shares appreciates.

Future sales of our securities in the public or private markets could adversely affect the trading price of our common shares or our ability to continue to raise funds in new equity offerings.

It is possible that we will sell common shares, or securities exercisable or convertible into common shares, in order to finance our planned development activities. Future sales of substantial amounts of our securities in the public or private markets would dilute our existing shareholders and potentially adversely affect the trading prices of our common shares or could impair our ability to raise capital through future offerings of securities. Alternatively, we may rely on debt financing and assume debt obligations that require us to make substantial interest and principal payments that could adversely affect our business or future growth potential.

Price volatility of our publicly traded securities could adversely affect investors’ portfolios.

In recent years and months, the securities markets in the U.S. and Canada have experienced high levels of price and volume volatility, and the market prices of securities of many companies have experienced wide fluctuations that have not necessarily been related to the operating performance, underlying asset values or prospects of such companies. There can be no assurance that continual fluctuations in the market price of our common shares will not occur. It may be anticipated that any quoted market for the common shares will be subject to market trends and conditions generally, notwithstanding

Table of Contents

~~Price~~any ~~volatility~~potential success we have in creating revenues, cash flows or earnings. The price of our ~~publicly~~common ~~traded~~shares ~~securities~~has ~~could~~been ~~adversely~~subject ~~affect~~to ~~investors’~~price ~~portfolios.~~and volume volatility in the past and will likely continue to be subject to such volatility in the future.

Because our common shares are not listed on a national securities exchange, a broker-dealer may find it more difficult to trade our common shares, and an investor may find it more difficult to acquire or dispose of our common shares in the secondary market.

We are subject to the so-called “penny stock” rules. The SEC has adopted regulations that define a “penny stock” to be any equity security that has a market price per share of less than $5.00, subject to certain exceptions, such as any securities listed on a national securities exchange. For any transaction involving a “penny stock,” unless exempt, the rules impose additional sales practice requirements on broker-dealers, subject to certain exceptions. A broker-dealer may find it more difficult to trade, and an investor may find it more difficult to acquire or dispose of, our common shares on the OTCQB Venture Marketplace. These factors could significantly negatively affect the market price of our common shares and our ability to raise capital.

General Risk Factors

Market factors outside of our control could have significant adverse impacts on our business, operations and/or prospects.

Operating in the volatile and cyclical natural resource industry subjects us to numerous market factors outside of our control that could have significant and sometimes adverse impacts on our business. Such factors could include significant price declines for key rare earth materials, inflationary impacts on capital and operating costs, public opposition, poor financial and operating performance of other companies in the same industry sector, environmental incidents from resource projects, major technological advances that reduce demand for key rare earth products, unforeseen regulation, military conflict, such as the Russia/Ukraine war, the conflicts in the Middle East, terrorism, banking institution stability, or other geopolitical events that broadly impact the global or domestic economy or natural resource industry. To the extent that such events affect attitudes toward investments in the natural resource sector generally or the rare earths industry specifically, or impact the overall economic climate, could affect our ability to raise the additional capital needed to continue to advance our ~~Projects~~projects and business plan.

~~Our~~Global ~~directors, officers~~ and ~~consultants~~regional ~~may~~political ~~be engaged in other businesses. Potential conflicts of interest or other obligations of directors, officers~~ and ~~consultants~~economic conditions could ~~interfere~~adversely ~~with~~impact ~~corporate~~our ~~operations~~business.

~~Some~~Political ofand ~~our~~economic ~~directors~~shifts, ~~officers~~both domestic and ~~consultants may be engaged in additional businesses~~international, ~~or situations~~ may ~~arise~~create ~~where~~uncertainty ~~our directors, officers~~ and ~~consultants~~pose ~~could~~risks beto inour ~~direct~~operations. ~~competition~~Policies ~~with~~related ~~us.~~to ~~Conflicts~~populism, ~~if any~~protectionism, ~~will~~economic ~~be dealt with in accordance with the relevant provisions of applicable policies~~nationalism, ~~regulations,~~ and ~~legislation.~~attitudes ~~Some~~toward ofmultinational ~~our~~corporations ~~directors~~could ~~and~~result ~~officers~~in ~~are~~regulatory orchanges, ~~may~~trade ~~become~~barriers, ~~directors~~ or ~~officers~~investment ~~of other entities engaged in other business ventures~~restrictions. AsAdditionally, ainternational ~~result~~trade ofdisputes, ~~their~~including ~~other~~tariffs, ~~business endeavors~~counter-tariffs, ~~our~~export ~~directors~~controls, ~~officers~~sanctions, and ~~consultants~~currency ~~may not be able to devote sufficient time to our business affairs~~regulations, ~~which~~ may ~~negatively~~increase ~~affect~~costs ~~our~~and ~~ability~~disrupt tosupply ~~conduct~~chain, ~~ongoing~~operating ~~operations~~model, orand tocustomer ~~generate revenues~~relationships.

WeFurther, ~~are~~market ~~subject~~volatility, todriven by shifts in U.S. and foreign trade policies, fluctuating interest rates, or currency controls may affect REE prices, capital availability, and investor confidence. Even the ~~risk~~perception of ~~litigation~~these risks could lead to reduced investment, ~~the~~higher ~~causes~~production costs, and ~~costs~~operational ofchallenges. ~~which~~If ~~are~~such ~~not~~trends ~~always~~continue, ~~known~~they may have a material adverse effect on our business and financial performance.

WeOur ~~are~~directors, ~~subject~~officers ~~to litigation arising in the normal course of business~~ and consultants may be ~~involved~~engaged in ~~disputes~~other ~~that may result in litigation~~businesses. Although we are not aware of any material pending or threatened litigation or of any legal proceedings known to be contemplated which are, or would be, likely to have a material adverse effect upon us or our operations, taken as a whole, the causes of potential future litigation cannot be known and may arise from, among other things, business activities,

Some of our directors and officers are or may become directors or officers of other entities engaged in other business ventures. As a result of their other business endeavors, our directors, officers, and consultants may not be able to devote sufficient time to our business affairs, which may negatively affect our ability to conduct ongoing operations or to generate revenues.

Table of Contents

~~environmental~~We ~~and~~are ~~health~~subject ~~and safety concerns, share price volatility or failure~~ to ~~comply~~the ~~with~~risk ~~disclosure obligations. The results~~ of litigation ~~cannot be predicted with certainty but could include costly damage awards or settlements~~, ~~fines,~~the causes and ~~the~~costs ~~loss~~ of ~~licenses,~~which ~~concessions, or rights, among other things. If we~~ are ~~unable~~not toalways ~~resolve a dispute favorably, either by judicial determination or settlement, it may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flows or results of operations~~known.

We are subject to litigation arising in the normal course of business and may be involved in disputes that may result in litigation. Although we are not aware of any material pending or threatened litigation or of any legal proceedings known to be contemplated which are, or would be, likely to have a material adverse effect upon us or our operations, taken as a whole, the causes of potential future litigation cannot be known and may arise from, among other things, business activities, environmental and health and safety concerns, share price volatility or failure to comply with disclosure obligations. The results of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty but could include costly damage awards or settlements, fines, and the loss of licenses, concessions, or rights, among other things. If we are unable to resolve a dispute favorably, either by judicial determination or settlement, it may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flows or results of operations.

We depend upon information technology systems, which are subject to cyber-attacks, disruption, damage, or failure and have risks associated with implementation and integration.

We depend upon information technology systems in the conduct of our operations. Our information technology systems are subject to disruption, damage, or failure from a variety of sources, including, without limitation, computer viruses, security breaches, cyber-attacks, natural disasters, and defects in design. Cybersecurity incidents, in particular, are evolving and include, but are not limited to, malicious software, attempts to gain unauthorized access to data and other electronic security breaches that could lead to disruptions in systems, financial losses, unauthorized releases of confidential or otherwise protected information or the corruption of data. Furthermore, as artificial intelligence capabilities improve and are increasingly adopted, we may see cyber-attacks created through artificial intelligence. Various measures have been implemented to manage our risks related to information technology systems and network disruptions. However, given the unpredictability of the timing, nature and scope of information technology disruptions, we could potentially be subject to downtimes, operational delays, the compromising of confidential or otherwise protected information, destruction or corruption of data, security breaches, other manipulation or improper use of our systems and networks or financial losses from remedial actions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, competitive position, financial condition or results of operations. See “Item 1C. Cybersecurity” of this Annual Report for more information about the systems and processes we use to manage these risks.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 1C. CYBERSECURITY

We face cybersecurity risks due to the breadth of networks and systems we must defend against cybersecurity attacks and threat actors seeking to inflict harm on us; and the substantial level of harm that could occur to us were we to suffer impacts of a material cybersecurity incident. We are committed to maintaining robust governance and oversight of these risks and to implementing mechanisms, controls, technologies, and processes designed to help us assess, identify, and manage these risks. In the year ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024, we did not experience a material “cybersecurity incident” as such term is defined in Item 106(a) of Regulation S-K. However, there can be no guarantee that we will not experience such an incident in the future. Such incidents, whether or not successful, could result in us incurring significant costs related to, for example, implementing additional threat protection measures and increased cybersecurity insurance premiums, defending against litigation, responding to regulatory inquiries or actions, paying damages, or taking other remedial steps with respect to third parties, as well as incurring significant reputational harm. In addition, these threats are constantly evolving, thereby increasing the difficulty of successfully defending against them or implementing adequate preventative measures. We seek to detect and investigate unauthorized attempts and attacks against our network, and to prevent their occurrence and recurrence where practicable through changes or updates to our internal processes and tools; however, we remain potentially vulnerable to known or unknown threats. In some instances, we and our suppliers may be unaware of a threat or incident or its magnitude and effects. Further, there is increasing regulation regarding responses to cybersecurity incidents, including reporting to regulators, which could subject us to additional liability and reputational harm. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Annual Report for more information on our cybersecurity risks and product vulnerability risks.

We aim to incorporate industry best practices throughout our cybersecurity program. Our cybersecurity strategy focuses on implementing effective and efficient controls, technologies, and other processes to assess, identify, and manage material cybersecurity risks. Our cybersecurity program is designed to be aligned with applicable industry standards and is maintained by a third-party technology firm. The third-party firm has processes in place to assess, identify, manage, and address material cybersecurity threats and incidents. These include, among other things, annual and ongoing security

Table of Contents

Our Board of Directors has ultimate oversight of our cybersecurity risk, which it manages as part of our enterprise risk management program. That program is utilized in making decisions with respect to Company priorities, resource allocations, and oversight structures. The Board of Directors is assisted by the Audit Committee, which regularly reviews our cybersecurity program with management and reports to the Board of Directors.

Our cybersecurity program is run by a third-party firm, which reports to our Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”). The third-party firm is informed about and monitors prevention, detection, mitigation, and remediation efforts through regular communication and reporting from professionals within its team and through the use of technological tools and software. Our CFO regularly reports directly to the Audit Committee or the Board of Directors on our cybersecurity program and efforts to prevent, detect, mitigate, and remediate issues. Cybersecurity reviews by the Audit Committee or the Board of Directors generally occur at least annually, or more frequently as determined to be necessary or advisable.

During 2024, the Company engaged a third-party technology firm to conduct an annual cyber risk assessment. The assessment resulted in certain recommended upgrades being made to the Company’s network. In early 2025, the Company engaged an independent cyber security firm to conduct a more comprehensive assessment of the Company’s information technology system. The Company is currently awaiting the findings from that assessment.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Information concerning our mining property in this Annual Report has been prepared in accordance with the SEC requirements of CFR Title 17, Subpart 229, Item 1300-1305 of Regulation S-K, which requires us to disclose our mineral resources and reserves as of the end of our most recently completed fiscal year for our material mining property.

As used in this Annual Report, the terms “mineral resource,” “measured mineral resource,” “indicated mineral resource,” “inferred mineral resource,” “mineral reserve,” “proven mineral reserve” and “probable mineral reserve” are defined and used in accordance with Subpart 229, Item 1300 of Regulation S-K. Under Subpart 1300 of Regulation S-K and NI 43-101, mineral resources may not be classified as “mineral reserves” unless the determination has been made by a qualified person that the indicated and measured mineral resources can be the basis of an economically viable project. We currently have no mineral reserves, and you are specifically cautioned not to assume that any part or all of the mineral resources will ever be converted into mineral reserves, as defined by the SEC. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Annual Report.

You are cautioned that, except for that portion of mineral resources classified as mineral reserves, mineral resources do not have demonstrated economic value. Inferred mineral resources are estimates based on limited geological evidence and sampling and have too high of a degree of uncertainty as to their existence to apply relevant technical and economic factors likely to influence the prospects of economic extraction in a manner useful for evaluation of economic viability. It should not be assumed that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category. A significant amount of exploration must be completed in order to determine whether an inferred mineral resource may be upgraded to a higher category. Therefore, you are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource exists, that it can be considered when assessing the economic viability of a mining project, or that it will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Likewise, you are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of measured or indicated mineral resources will ever be converted to mineral reserves. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Annual Report.

The information that follows relating to the Bear Lodge REE Project is derived from, and in some instances is an extract from, the TRS, dated February 29, 2024, relating to the Bear Lodge REE Project prepared in compliance with CFR Title 17, Subpart 229, Item 601(b)(96) of Regulation S-K. Portions of the following information are based on assumptions, qualifications and procedures that are not fully described herein. Reference should be made to the full text of the TRS, incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Annual Report. We are in the process of completing an NI 43-101 compliant technical report for the Bear Lodge REE Project, and we do not expect that there will be any material differences between the NI 43-101 compliant technical report and the information set forth below and contained in the TRS.

Qualified Persons

The scientific and technical disclosures about the Bear Lodge REE Project in this Annual Report have been reviewed and approved by:

● Mr. Alan C. Noble, Professional Engineer, Ore Reserves Engineering;

Table of Contents

qualifications and procedures that are not fully described herein. Reference should be made to the full text of the TRS, incorporated herein by reference and made a part of this Annual Report. We recently completed the Technical Report, which is NI 43-101 compliant for the Bear Lodge REE Project, and there are no material differences between the Technical Report and the information set forth below and contained in the TRS.

Qualified Persons

The scientific and technical disclosures about the Bear Lodge REE Project in this Annual Report are derived from the TRS and the Technical Report and have been reviewed and approved by:

●

Mr. Alan C. Noble, Professional Engineer, Ore Reserves Engineering;

●

Ms. Monica Barrero Bouza, Geologist, EurGeol; and

● Mr. Jaye Pickarts, Professional Engineer, ~~and~~former consultant to the Company and since October 2024 the Company’s Chief Operating Officer.

~~All~~Mr. Noble and Ms. Bouza are both independent of the Company and all three are qualified persons as defined by Regulation S-K (Subpart 229, Item 1300) and NI 43-101 (Standard of Disclosure for Mineral Projects). For a description of the key assumptions, parameters and methods used to estimate mineral resources included in this Annual Report, as well as data verification procedures and a general discussion of the extent to which the estimates may be affected by any known environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, sociopolitical, marketing or other relevant factors, please review the TRS on the Bear Lodge REE Project (as described below), which is ~~included~~incorporated asby anreference ~~exhibit~~in to this Annual Report, as well as the Technical Report available under the Company’s profile at www.sedarplus.ca.

Individual Property Disclosure

Bear Lodge Property

The Bear Lodge Property, which is located in Central Crook County, Wyoming, contains two projects, the Bear Lodge REE Project and the Sundance Gold Project. The Bear Lodge REE Project consists of the Bull Hill and Whitetail Ridge REE deposits and the exploration targets of East Taylor (“Taylor”) and Carbon Hill (“Carbon”) ~~deposits~~, all of which are located near Sundance, Wyoming. The Bear Lodge REE Project also ~~includes~~incorporates the proposed processing and separation plant as well as the Demonstration Plant (under construction) in Upton, Wyoming. See the property location map below. Additional details on each of these areas are set forth below under the heading “Bear Lodge REE Project.” We hold our interest in the Bear Lodge Property through our ~~indirect~~ wholly-owned subsidiary, Rare Element Resources, Inc., a Wyoming corporation.

Bear Lodge Property – Location Map

We control 100% of the mineral rights at the Bear Lodge Property, consisting of unpatented mining claims and a right of repurchase on adjacent private land (Section 16). We hold 499 unpatented mining claims located on land administered by the USFS. The Bear Lodge Property is located within parts of Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 and 35 in Township 52 North and Range 63 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, Crook County, Wyoming. All of the public property mining claims are unpatented, such that the paramount title to the land is held by the U.S. All of the mineral resources identified in the TRS are located on mining claims that we hold.

Table of Contents

On October 25, 2021, the Company and Whitelaw Creek LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company (“Whitelaw Creek”), entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the asset purchase agreement dated October 20, 2016 between the Company and Whitelaw Creek (the “APA”). The Amendment modified certain provisions of the APA related to the terms and conditions of the Company’s option to repurchase (the “Repurchase Option”) approximately 640 acres of non-core real property located in Crook County, Wyoming, that is under consideration for a stockpile facility for the Bear Lodge ~~REE~~Property ~~Project.~~– ~~Pursuant~~Location to and subject to the terms of the Amendment, among other things, the term of the Repurchase Option (which was to expire on October 26, 2021) was extended for up to three additional years, subject to annual option extension payments from the Company to Whitelaw Creek of $25 in cash per year (each, a “Repurchase Option Extension Payment”); and the exercise price of the Repurchase Option was increased from $1,000 to a price to be determined by a mutually agreed upon real estate appraiser (the “Repurchase Price”), provided that (i) the Repurchase Price must not be less than $1,200 or greater than $1,850 and (ii) any Repurchase Option Extension Payments paid by the Company to Whitelaw Creek must be credited toward the Company’s payment of the Repurchase Price if the Repurchase Option is later exercised. In October 2023, the Company made the $25 Repurchase Option Extension Payment to Whitelaw Creek to extend the term of the Repurchase Option through October 26, 2024.Map

Our 100% interest in the 499 unpatented mining claims was, in part, acquired from Phelps Dodge Exploration Company (now a subsidiary of Freeport-McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc. (“Freeport”) by way of a Mineral Lease and Option for Deed in 2000, and 404 claims were transferred from Newmont Mining Corporation (“Newmont”) to us in May 2010.

We control 100% of the mineral rights at the Bear Lodge Property, consisting of unpatented mining claims and an adjacent property (hereinafter referred to as the “Section 16 property”) owned by the Company. We hold 499 unpatented mining claims located on land administered by the USFS. The Bear Lodge Property is located within parts of Sections 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34 and 35 in Township 52 North and Range 63 West, Sixth Principal Meridian, Crook County, Wyoming. All of the public property mining claims are unpatented, such that the paramount title to the land is held by the U.S. All of the mineral resources identified in the TRS are located on mining claims that we hold.

On October 25, 2021, the Company and Whitelaw Creek LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company (“Whitelaw Creek”), entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the asset purchase agreement dated October 20, 2016 between the Company and Whitelaw Creek (the “APA”). The Amendment modified certain provisions of the APA related to the terms and conditions of the Company’s option to repurchase (the “Repurchase Option”) the Section 16 property, consisting of approximately 640 acres (257 hectares) of non-core real property located in Crook County, Wyoming, that was under consideration for a stockpile facility for the Bear Lodge REE Project. Pursuant to the terms of the APA with Whitelaw Creek, as extended, RER exercised its option to repurchase the Section 16 property, and on October 21, 2024, entered into a purchase agreement with Whitelaw Creek to repurchase the Section 16 property (the “Land Repurchase”). The Land Repurchase closed on October 25, 2024 (the “Closing Date”). As consideration for the Land Repurchase, on the Closing Date, the Company (i) issued 5,000,000 of its common shares to Whitelaw Creek having a Closing Date fair value of $1,950 and (ii) paid Whitelaw Creek $1,507 in cash.

Our 100% interest in the 499 unpatented mining claims was, in part, acquired from Phelps Dodge Exploration Company (now a subsidiary of Freeport-McMoRan Copper and Gold Inc. (“Freeport”)) by way of a Mineral Lease and Option for Deed in 2000, and 404 claims were transferred from Newmont Mining Corporation (“Newmont”) to us in May 2010.

Some of our mining claims and a portion of a defined area of influence surrounding the claims were previously subject to a production royalty of 2% of net smelter returns (“NSR”) royalty payable to Freeport, but the Company purchased the NSR royalty in March 2009. We hold an unencumbered REE project, including all 499 unpatented mining claims, free of third-party royalties for REE production.

In order to maintain all claims in good standing, the Company is responsible for the payment of annual federal claim maintenance fees (currently $~~0.165~~200/claim) and the recording of the annual claim maintenance and intent to hold notice with Crook County, Wyoming. All 499 unpatented claims included in the project are located on both federal and private lands and are subject to annual maintenance fees payable to the United States Bureau of Land Management. Mineral rights on the mining claims and the approximately 640-acre private parcel under the Repurchase Option provide the Company mineral and surface rights to explore, develop, and mine the Bear Lodge Property, subject to the prior procurement of required operating permits and approvals and compliance with applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and ordinances.

Table of Contents

and are subject to annual maintenance fees payable to the United States Bureau of Land Management. Mineral rights on the mining claims and the approximately 640-acre Section 16 property provide the Company with mineral and surface rights to explore, develop, and mine the Bear Lodge Property, subject to the prior procurement of required operating permits and approvals and compliance with applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations, and ordinances.

Infrastructure

Exploration has been conducted on the Bear Lodge Property since 1949. In addition to Freeport, several mining companies have conducted exploration and drilling programs at or near the Bear Lodge Property since the discovery of mineralization. No mining operations were conducted at the Bear Lodge Property by any of the prior owners.

Motels, restaurants, gas stations, and other services are available at Sundance, Upton, and other nearby towns, and a greater variety of accommodations are available to the east in Spearfish, South Dakota. All necessary infrastructure, such as housing, food, fuel, etc. would be available in these towns or further to the west in Gillette and southeast in Newcastle. Water rights at the mine site are available through permitting by the Wyoming State Engineer’s Office; these water rights have not been secured at the time of reporting. Near the mine site, a power line, which requires upgrading, runs to within a mile of the Bear Lodge Property.

Supplies can be trucked to the Bear Lodge Property 60 miles (100 kilometers) from Gillette, which is located on both U.S. Interstate Highway 90 and rail lines. A Burlington Northern Santa Fe rail transport line is also located at Moorcroft, 34 miles (54 kilometers) west of Sundance, and at Upton, 40 miles (64 kilometers) south. The Powder River Basin contains multiple power plants, and Gillette, the largest city in the basin, would be a major logistics center for any development at the Bear Lodge Property. The current size of the mine property is sufficiently large to support a mining operation, with no foreseeable obstacles to expansion, subject to a favorable outcome regarding permitting.

Table of Contents

Condition of the Property

We are not aware of any outstanding environmental liabilities associated with the Bear Lodge Property, except for the required reclamation work associated with our exploration and drilling activities. Previous exploration activities were approved by both the USFS and the ~~Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality~~WDEQ. We have an approved reclamation plan and have posted surety bonds to cover the required reclamation. Certain of these reclamation activities were completed in 2024, and we are now awaiting final WDEQ approval for the removal of these obligations from our reclamation liability.

Additional local, state, and federal licenses and permits will be required for exploration, mining, processing and/or beneficiation operations, if we decide to proceed with further exploration or mine development and operations.

The Bear Lodge Property is an exploration stage property with no proven or probable reserves. There has been no historical production from the property.

The Bear Lodge REE Project

The Bear Lodge REE Project is located in Central Crook County, northeastern Wyoming, in the northwestern portion of the Black Hills uplift. The property is situated in the central Bear Lodge Mountains, a relatively small northwesterly trending range. The project is flanked to the west by the Powder River Basin, famous for its extensive coal mining, and is adjoined by the Great Plains to the southeast. See the property location map below.

The Bear Lodge REE Project lies about seven air miles (11 kilometers) or 12 road miles (19 kilometers) northwest of the town of Sundance (Wyoming), approximately 22 air miles (35 kilometers) west of the South Dakota state line, 55 air miles (89 kilometers) east of Gillette (Wyoming), and 230 miles (370 kilometers) north of Cheyenne, the Wyoming state ~~capitol~~capital. Gillette is the headquarters for much of the Wyoming coal mining industry.

General Property Location Map

Table of Contents

General Property Location Map

Geological Setting

The Bear Lodge Mountains of northeast Wyoming are part of the Black Hills Uplift, which has a northwesterly orientation and extends from the western South Dakota – Nebraska border through northeastern Wyoming into southeastern Montana. The exposed basement consists of Precambrian schist, gneiss, and granite overlain by Paleozoic and Mesozoic clastic and carbonate sedimentary rocks eroded from higher elevations. Eocene (Tertiary) alkaline intrusive and extrusive bodies in the northern Black Hills form an N70°-80°W trending belt that extends from Bear Butte in South Dakota through the Bear Lodge Mountains, Devil’s Tower, and Missouri Buttes in northeastern Wyoming. These alkaline igneous rocks are represented by dikes, sills, stocks, laccoliths, diatremes, and ring complexes are associated with REE-enriched carbonatite dikes in the Bear Lodge alkaline-igneous complex.

The Bear Lodge alkaline-igneous complex is a northwest-trending alkaline intrusive dome with dimensions of approximately 10 kilometers (6.2 miles) NW-SE by six kilometers (3.7 miles) NE-SW. The complex consists predominantly of multiple intrusions of phonolite, trachyte, and other alkaline igneous rocks, and a variety of associated breccias and diatremes.

Exploration and Drilling

The Bear Lodge Mountains were initially prospected for gold during the late nineteenth and early twentieth century. Rare earth mineralization was first discovered in approximately 1949. Various companies conducted sporadic exploration of the area from the 1970s through the 1990s, both for rare earths and for gold. Commencing in 2004, we initiated REE exploration activities and from 2004 through 2013, a total of more than 48,768 meters (160,000 feet) of drilling was completed in over 200 core holes. These exploration activities included geochemical, geophysical, geological, and mineralogical modeling of the district and individual deposits.

The 2013 drilling program involved infill drilling at the Whitetail Ridge deposit, including 14 core holes for a total of 3,556.5 meters (11,698 feet). The second phase consisted of 21 core holes totaling 3,247 meters (10,651 feet) and six reverse circulation (“RC”) twin holes totaling 832 meters (2,730 feet). The RC twin holes were drilled using a center return hammer with the objective of minimizing hole erosion and obtaining assay data directly correlative to that from the adjacent core holes.

The 2014 program consisted of excavating a test trench along the southwestern flank of Bull Hill in August. The main mineralized zone was exposed and exploited to collect geological information, including dike dimension and structural continuity, grade variation, ore and gangue mineralogy, pit slope stability engineering and confirmation of parameters utilized in ore resource calculations. The program netted 700 tonnes of sample materials, the bulk of which is stored for current and future metallurgical work.

No exploration drilling was conducted from 2013 through the end of 2023 and no drilling or exploration activities are currently planned for 2024.

Mineralization

The Bear Lodge REE Project comprises two main areas represented by the Bull Hill and Whitetail Ridge deposits, as well as the exploration targets of the Carbon Hill and East Taylor deposits (see map below). All the deposits have carbonatite-related dikes and veins that range in size from hairline fracture veinlets to dikes that may exceed 80 feet (24.4 meters) in width. Lower-grade stockworks of veinlets commonly surround the higher-grade REE-bearing dikes and veins. Oxidized mineralization (FMR and OxCa) extends to depths of 500 to 600 feet (152 to 183 meters). Oxide zone REE mineralization is dominated by REE minerals of the bastnäsite group, with variable and typically subordinate quantities of monazite and cerianite. Oxide-carbonate mineralization contains a variable mix of bastnäsite group minerals and ancylite, with varied and subordinate amounts of monazite and cerianite.

Table of Contents

reverse circulation (“RC”) twin holes totaling 832 meters (2,730 feet). The RC twin holes were drilled using a center return hammer with the objective of minimizing hole erosion and obtaining assay data directly correlative to that from the adjacent core holes.

The 2014 program consisted of excavating a test trench along the southwestern flank of Bull Hill in August. The main mineralized zone was exposed and exploited to collect geological information, including dike dimension and structural continuity, grade variation, ore and gangue mineralogy, pit slope stability engineering and confirmation of parameters utilized in ore resource calculations. The program netted approximately 630 tonnes (695 tons) of sample materials that will be utilized in the Demonstration Plant.

No exploration drilling was conducted from 2013 through the end of 2024, and no drilling or exploration activities are currently planned for 2025.

Mineralization

Bull Hill District Grade Shells

REE mineralization is widespread on the property. However, the area proximal to the Bull Hill and Whitetail diatreme bodies is believed to be the most prospective for significant REE mineralization.

Bull Hill and Whitetail Ridge Deposits

The Bull Hill deposit mineralized bodies occur as steeply dipping, FMR-carbonatite dike swarms, and associated stockwork. Geological interpretation of results from the 2010–2014 drill and trench programs indicates that the Bull Hill deposit area is dominated by northwest-striking mineralized bodies in the southern two-thirds of the resource area, while the northern part of the resource area exhibits a transitional change in strike from a north-westerly to a north-easterly direction. The dike swarm primarily intrudes heterolithic intrusive breccia of the Bull Hill diatreme and adjacent trachytic and phonolitic intrusive rocks. Carbonatite dikes at depth are interpreted to transition toward the surface into OxCa and FMR bodies. The mineralized structures range in size from veinlets to large dikes more than 30 meters in(98 ~~width.~~feet) ~~The Bull Hill deposit consists of one dominant dike set and several subsidiary dike sets~~ in ~~a swarm that has dimensions of more than 457 meters along strike and less than 100 meters in~~ width. ~~The dikes appear to pinch and swell in both strike and dip directions, and they can be traced in drill holes more than 305 meters down dip.~~

The Whitetail Ridge deposit occurs about 700 meters northwest of the Bull Hill deposit. The REE mineralization consists of northwest- and north-striking FMR dikes, and an FMR stockwork zone that is also elongated northeasterly, with dimensions of roughly 380 meters by 290 meters. The enveloping gravity and radiometric geophysical anomalies and coincident soil geochemical anomalies are larger and may indicate a broader distribution of REE mineralization beneath the extensive soil and colluvial cover. Drilling conducted from 2011 through 2013 indicates that much of the mineralization is confined within the volume of the Whitetail Ridge diatreme.

Other Exploration Target Areas at the Bear Lodge REE Project

The discovery of high-grade REE mineralization at the East Taylor and the Carbon target areas expanded the area of known REE mineralization outside of the Bull Hill and Whitetail Ridge deposits. The data indicates that the Bear Lodge REE Project area covers a crudely elliptical area that extends approximately 1,750 meters northwest-southeast by 1,300 meters northeast-southwest. The Carbon exploration target area is located northwest of the Bull Hill deposit, and the East Taylor Target Area is located west of the Bull Hill deposit. Drill assay data from the East Taylor and the Carbon target areas identify these areas as zones of HREE-enrichment relative to the Bull Hill deposit. These two exploration target areas, along with the Whitetail Ridge deposit, are peripheral to the Bull Hill deposit. The discovery of these target areas indicates good potential for additional deposits of high-grade REE in the western half of the Bear Lodge REE Project, and those deposits appear to be particularly enriched in HREE.

Table of Contents

The Bull Hill deposit consists of one dominant dike set and several subsidiary dike sets in a swarm that has dimensions of more than 457 meters (1,499 feet) along strike and less than 100 meters (328 feet) in width. The dikes appear to pinch and swell in both strike and dip directions, and they can be traced in drill holes more than 305 meters (1,001 feet) down dip.

The Whitetail Ridge deposit occurs about 700 meters (2,297 feet) northwest of the Bull Hill deposit. The REE mineralization consists of northwest- and north-striking FMR dikes, and an FMR stockwork zone that is also elongated northeasterly, with dimensions of roughly 380 meters by 290 meters (1,247 feet by 951 feet). The enveloping gravity and radiometric geophysical anomalies and coincident soil geochemical anomalies are larger and may indicate a broader distribution of REE mineralization beneath the extensive soil and colluvial cover. Drilling conducted from 2011 through 2013 indicates that much of the mineralization is confined within the volume of the Whitetail Ridge diatreme.

Other Exploration Target Areas at the Bear Lodge REE Project

The discovery of high-grade REE mineralization at the East Taylor and the Carbon target areas expanded the area of known REE mineralization outside of the Bull Hill and Whitetail Ridge deposits. The data indicates that the Bear Lodge REE Project area covers a crudely elliptical area that extends approximately 1,750 meters (5,741 feet) northwest-southeast by 1,300 meters (4,265 feet) northeast-southwest. The Carbon exploration target area is located northwest of the Bull Hill deposit, and the East Taylor Target Area is located west of the Bull Hill deposit. Drill assay data from the East Taylor and the Carbon target areas identify these areas as zones of HREE-enrichment relative to the Bull Hill deposit. These two exploration target areas, along with the Whitetail Ridge deposit, are peripheral to the Bull Hill deposit. The discovery of these target areas indicates good potential for additional deposits of high-grade REE in the western half of the Bear Lodge REE Project, and those deposits appear to be particularly enriched in HREE.

Permitting and Licensing

The USFS is the lead agency in the NEPA process to prepare an EIS on the Bear Lodge REE Project. This process is essential to securing the permits and approvals necessary to move into production. In early 2012, we submitted the plan of operations for the Bear Lodge REE Project, which the USFS accepted as complete in May 2013. The USFS selected a project manager and prime contractor for the preparation of the draft EIS, published notice in the Federal Register and completed necessary scoping work. The USFS issued a draft EIS on January 15, 2016, outlining plan alternatives and proffering a preferred alternative. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the appropriate state and local government agencies were involved in the EIS process as cooperating agencies. On January 22, 2016, our Board of Directors decided to conserve cash due to the difficult market conditions at the time and suspended all permitting and licensing efforts, including the EIS process. We notified the USFS and cooperating agencies, the NRC, and the state of Wyoming of our decision to suspend permitting and licensing efforts, and the parties acknowledged receipt of the notice. During 2022, the Company undertook environmental sampling to update the baseline environmental data for the Bear Lodge REE Project.

The Company will be required to obtain permits and licenses to further develop the Bear Lodge REE Project from the USFS, the Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality Land Quality Division (WDEQ-LQD), and the NRC.

Processing and Decommissioning

The Company is proceeding with the construction and operations of a rare earth processing and separation Demonstration Plant. The Demonstration Plant construction was substantially completed in late 2024 and is ~~scheduled~~expected to be in operation in mid-~~2024~~2025 following a period of equipment commissioning. The Demonstration Plant is expected to advance the Company’s proprietary processing and separation technology and generate the operational and economic data necessary for the design of a commercial-scale facility.

Reclamation of mining-related facilities are planned to occur during mine operations, where applicable, and upon completion of mining and stockpiling of materials. Other facilities would be reclaimed as soon as the stockpiled materials are depleted.

Table of Contents

Mineral Resource Estimate

In March 2024, the Company announced the completion of a new mineral resource estimate based on maximizing the recovery of La and the key magnet materials of Nd, Pr, Tb, and Dy. The estimate was focused on the oxide zone of the Bull Hill deposit at the Bear Lodge REE Project with long-term upside existing in the Carbon, Whitetail, and Taylor deposits. The resource estimate was based on 252 core holes drilled between 2009 and 2013, including 20,491 assay intervals that totaled 186,712 feet (56,910 meters) of drilling from the Company’s drill hole database. The estimate also used the economic data generated from the 2021 pilot plant testing of the Company’s proprietary processing and separation technology. The resource estimate focuses on the Ox and OxCa zones of the Bull Hill deposit, which are considered the best plant feed and are expected to have the best recoveries and costs by utilizing the Company’s innovative technology.

The Bull Hill deposit estimates of measured, indicated, and inferred mineral resources, based on a base-case cutoff grade for resource reporting of 2.18% TREO, are summarized in Table 1 below. ~~The~~As noted in the TRS, the effective date of ~~this~~the mineral resource estimate is December 31, 2023. ~~(Table~~The 1)Company has determined that the assumptions included in the mineral resource estimate are reasonable as of December 31, 2024.

Table 1. Bull Hill TREO Mineral Resource Summary for the Total Oxide (Ox & OxCa)
at the End of the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2024

Resource Class	Cutoff %TREO	Metric Tonnes	%TREO	Contained TREO Metric Tonnes	Recovered TREO Metric Tonnes	Recovered NdPr Metric Tonnes
Resource Class	Cutoff %TREO		%TREO		(millions)		(000’s)	(000’s)	(000’s)
Measured mineral resources	2.18	2.04	4.53	92.4	60.6	18.4
Indicated mineral resources	2.18	3.98	3.85	153.1	99.9	31.3
Measured & indicated (M&I) mineral resources	2.18	6.02	4.08	245.5	160.5	49.7
Inferred mineral resources	2.18	1.90	3.61	68.5	44.9	14.4
Notes: 1. Mineral resources do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no guarantee that any part of the mineral resource will be converted to mineral reserves in the future. All figures in the above table have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the grade and tonnage estimates. 2. This mineral resource estimate is reported in accordance with Regulation S-K (CFR Title 17 Part 229 Items 1300–1305) at a cut-off grade of 2.18% TREO. 3. Only certain rare earth elements (La, Nd, Pr, Dy, and a heavy rare earth element mixed oxide, including Yb, Tm, Tb, Er, Ho, Lu) are considered payable for pit optimization purposes. 4. The estimated overall NdPr process recovery is 90%. 5. The point of reference for mineral resource is in situ mineralization. 6. See Table 2 for metallurgical recoveries, pay factors, and commodity price assumptions used for the purposes of preparing mineral resource estimates.

36At December 31, 2024, we had no proven or probable mineral reserves. The metallurgical recoveries, pay factors, and commodity price assumptions used in the preparation of the mineral resource estimate are shown in Table 2 below. Additional information about these assumptions is provided in Chapter 11 of the TRS and in the Technical Report.

Table of Contents

Table 1. Bull Hill TREO Mineral Resource Summary for the Total Oxide (Ox & OxCa)at the End of the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2023

Resource Class	Cutoff %TREO	MetricTonnes	%TREO	Contained TREO Metric Tonnes	Recovered TREO Metric Tonnes	Recovered NdPr Metric Tonnes
					(millions)		(000’s)	(000’s)	(000’s)
Measured mineral resources	2.18	2.04	4.53	92.4	60.6	18.4
Indicated mineral resources	2.18	3.98	3.85	153.1	99.9	31.3
Measured & indicated (M&I) mineral resources	2.18	6.02	4.08	245.5	160.5	49.7
Inferred mineral resources	2.18	1.90	3.61	68.5	44.9	14.4
Notes:1.Mineral resources do not have demonstrated economic viability. There is no guarantee that any part of the mineral resource will be converted to mineral reserves in the future. All figures in the above table have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the grade and tonnage estimates.2.This mineral resource estimate is reported in accordance with Regulation S-K (CFR Title 17 Part 229 Items 1300–1305) at a cut-off grade of 2.18% TREO.3.Only certain rare earth elements (La, Nd, Pr, Dy, and a heavy rare earth element mixed oxide, including Yb, Tm, Tb, Er, Ho, Lu) are considered payable for pit optimization purposes.4.The estimated overall NdPr process recovery is 90%.5.[The point of reference for mineral resource is in situ mineralization.

At December 31, 2023, we had no proven or probable mineral reserves. The metallurgical recoveries, pay factors, and commodity price assumptions used in the preparation of the mineral resource estimate are shown in Table 2 below. Additional information about these assumptions is provided in Chapter 11 of the TRS.

Table 2. Pay Factors, Hydromet Plant Recoveries and Rare-Earth Elements Prices

Element	Pay Factor	Hydromet Plant Recoveries	Prices (US $ /Kg)
La (Lanthanun)	1	0.907	0.93
Nd (Neodymium)	1	0.898	77.25
Pr (Praseodymium)	1	0.902	76.48
Dy (Dysprosium)	0.75	0.835	320
*HREE (Yb+Tm+Tb+Er+Ho+Lu)	0.5	0.816	1200
Ce (Cerium)	0	0.336	0
Sm (Samarium)	0	0.912	0
Eu (Europium)	0	0.913	0
Gd (Gadolinium)	0	0.924	0
Y (Ytrrium)	0	0.788	0

*HREE (Heavy Rare Earth Elements) = Ytterbium (Yb)+Thulium (Tm)+ Terbium (Tb)+ Erbium (Er)+Holmium (Ho)+Lutetium (Lu)

Data Verification

The Company obtained the geological, exploration, and drilling data package from Phelps Dodge and Newmont Corporation, covering most of the work done on the property by various companies and claim owners through 1996. From 2006 until spring 2010, the Company conducted its own REE drilling programs throughout the Bear Lodge Property under a joint venture agreement with the Newmont Mining Corporation (“Newmont”), with the Company maintaining a separate database of REE drilling results. While the Company continued focusing on the exploration for REEs, Newmont's efforts continued in gold exploration. Separation of the two exploration drilling programs for REEs and gold, and their respective drilling data continued through the 2009 drill season when the Company assumed control of the program with the termination of Newmont's interest in the property in May 2010.

Table of Contents

continued in gold exploration. Separation of the two exploration drilling programs for REEs and gold, and their respective drilling data continued through the 2009 drill season when the Company assumed control of the program with the termination of Newmont's interest in the property in May 2010.

Drill hole data prior to 2008 has not been used for resource estimates.

From 2008 through 2010, the Company compiled analytical data in Excel, Access, and Datamine for use in GIS and 3D mapping software. Between 2010 and 2011, a drill data management system was implemented by EDM Solutions. The drill data management database was built on an MS SQL SERVER platform and was hosted on a secure “Cloud” server with restricted access. Security and backup features were built into the system and were considered industry standard. The data is currently maintained in the Company’s archives.

All on-site drilling programs conducted by the Company were supervised by experienced geology professionals. Company geologists and consultants from Ore Reserves Engineering conducted extensive reviews and verified data from the 2009 – 2013 drilling programs, for use in the TRS resource estimate.

Drill hole collar surveys for all 2008 through 2013 core holes were surveyed by Bear Lodge Ltd., professional engineers and land surveyors based in Sundance, Wyoming. Down-hole surveys were conducted on all core holes drilled by Company personnel from the 2008 through 2013 drill programs.

REE assays for the 2009, 2012, and 2013 programs were conducted by Activation Laboratories of Ancaster, Ontario, and assays for the 2010 and 2011 drill programs were done by ALS Laboratories. Both laboratories are independent, ISO 9001 accredited and operate to standards consistent with ISO 17025 methods.

Dr. Jeffrey Jaacks of Geochemical Applications International Inc. conducted a review of the results for the quality assurance and quality control (QA/QC) program used in rare earth element assaying for the Bear Lodge exploration drill ~~programs (2009-2013). Dr. Jaacks, in his review, concluded that the 2009-2013 drill program analysis/assays to be of an acceptable quality and appropriate for resource estimation.~~

Rare Earth Processing and Separation Demonstration Plant Project

A consortium of companies, of which the Company is a member, and which is led by General Atomics, has secured with the DoE a $21,900 Assistance Agreement for the engineering, construction, operation and decommissioning of a rare earth separation and processing Demonstration Plant to be located in Upton, Wyoming at a leased industrial site near infrastructure (the “Demonstration Plant”). The consortium created by General Atomics, an affiliate of Synchron, includes certain of General Atomics’ affiliates, the Company, and LNV, an Ardurra Group, Inc. company, as engineering and construction subcontractor. The Company, as a subrecipient of the award, along with the other consortium members, commenced work on the planning and design of the demonstration project in November 2021, and the Company’s contractual arrangement with General Atomics was finalized in December 2021. The DoE funding represents approximately one-half of the total originally estimated costs for the project.

Pursuant to the Cost Share Funding Assumption Agreement, dated as of November 30, 2021, between the Company and General Atomics, the Company agreed to assume and pay for the approximately one-half non-federal costs incurred by General Atomics and the consortium for the design, construction, operation, and decommissioning of the Demonstration Plant. The original estimate for the non-federal cost-share funding for the Demonstration Plant was secured by the Company through the rights offering that closed in December 2021 and is more fully described in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of this report as is the rights offering that closed in March 2024 and raised gross proceeds of approximately $35,800 to fund further Demonstration Plant activities and other Company initiatives.

The purpose of the Demonstration Plant is to process and separate certain rare earth elements from previously stockpiled high-grade sample materials from the Bear Lodge REE Project, utilizing the Company’s proprietary extraction and separation processes. The Demonstration Plant has been designed as a demonstration-scale facility that will produce high-

Table of Contents

~~purity~~programs ~~NdPr~~(2009-2013). Dr. Jaacks, asin ~~well~~his asreview, ~~other~~concluded ~~rare~~that ~~earth~~the ~~oxides.~~2009-2013 ~~Successful~~drill ~~operation~~program ~~will~~analysis/assays ~~serve~~to asbe aof ~~precursor~~an toacceptable aquality ~~future~~and ~~full-scale~~appropriate ~~production~~for ~~facility~~resource estimation.

Rare Earth Processing and Separation Demonstration Plant Project

During 2021, a consortium of companies, of which the Company is a member, and which is led by General Atomics, secured with the DoE an assistance agreement for the engineering, construction, operation and decommissioning of a rare earth separation and processing Demonstration Plant to be located in Upton, Wyoming at a leased industrial site near infrastructure (the “Demonstration Plant”). The consortium created by General Atomics, an affiliate of Synchron, includes certain of General Atomics’ affiliates, the Company, and LNV, an Ardurra Group, Inc. company, as engineering and construction subcontractor. The Company, as a subrecipient of the award, along with the other consortium members, commenced work on the planning and design of the demonstration project in November 2021.

As of December 31, 2024, construction of the Demonstration Plant was substantially complete, with operations expected to start during mid-2025.

Demonstration Plant Permitting and Licensing

On July 31, 2023, the NRC issued the Company a Source Material License. This license is necessary to allow the processing of previously stockpiled material from the Bear Lodge REE Project at the Company’s Demonstration Plant. In November 2023, the DoE’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy finalized its NEPA review of the Company’s Demonstration Plant issuing a finding of no significant impact (also known as a “FONSI”), completing the federal permitting activity required for construction of the Demonstration Plant. Finally on December 21, 2023, the DoE’s Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy issued a Project Continuation Notice following its approval of the budget for construction of the Company’s Demonstration Plant. This approval, along with the completion of the DoE’s NEPA review, allowed for the commencement of the construction of the Demonstration Plant.

The Demonstration Plant will encompass the physical processing of the sample materials followed by chemical processing to extract selected elements. All chemicals will be managed in accordance with federal, state, and local environmental and safety regulations. The Company has obtained a source materials possession license from the NRC as well as an air quality permit from the WDEQ. A road use permit was secured from the USFS to improve the access road to the sample storage location. All licenses and permits required for the construction of the Demonstration Plant have now been secured.

As part of the project licensing with the NRC, the Company has secured and maintains, on behalf of the Demonstration Plant project, a reclamation bond in the amount of $917 and has posted cash collateral of $~~183~~195 as security for the bond. The ultimate clean-up and any associated decommissioning costs of the Demonstration Plant are the responsibility of the Company and payment of these costs will be handled through the Cost Share ~~Funding~~Agreement ~~Assumption~~(as ~~Agreement~~defined below).

Demonstration Plant Project Schedule

To achieve the Demonstration Plant project objectives, the schedule iswas divided into three distinct performance periods, which commenced on October 1, 2021. During the performance periods, there ~~are~~were three DoE go/no go decision points.

● Performance Period 1: Design, Permitting and Licensing Commencement ~~– 15 months~~

● Performance Period 2: Procurement and Construction ~~– approximately 15–17 months~~

● Performance Period 3: Operations ~~– approximately 12 to 15 months~~

The objective of Performance Period 1, which was achieved in December 2022, was the completion of the design of the facility and the establishment of requirements and standards to support the subsequent procurement of process equipment, as well as commencement of permitting and licensing. Licensing and permitting was extended into Performance Period 2 and achieved in early 2024. The objective of Performance Period 2, now underway, is the final procurement of the process equipment and the construction of the Demonstration Plant. The objective of Performance Period 3 is the actual operation of the Demonstration Plant itself in accordance with all local, state, and federal permits, licenses, and regulations.39

~~The~~Table ~~first DoE go/no-go decision point occurred upon final design and was achieved in December 2022. The second go/no go decision point followed the completion~~ of the NRC licensing and DoE NEPA review, and occurred in December 2023, and the third go/no go decision point is at the completion of construction of the plant and achieving readiness for operations and is expected in mid-2024.Contents

The objective of Performance Period 1, which was achieved in December 2022, was the completion of the design of the facility and the establishment of requirements and standards to support the subsequent procurement of process equipment, as well as commencement of permitting and licensing. Licensing and permitting was extended into Performance Period 2 and achieved in early 2024. The objective of Performance Period 2, now nearing completion, was the final procurement of the process equipment and construction of the Demonstration Plant. The objective of Performance Period 3 is the actual operation of the Demonstration Plant itself in accordance with all local, state, and federal permits, licenses, and regulations.

In December 2022, the Demonstration Plant achieved its final engineering design milestone, marking the DoE’s first go/no-go decision point. A second go/no-go gating milestone was achieved in December 2023 with the issuance by the DoE of a Project Continuation Notice, allowing for the construction of the Demonstration Plant. In September 2024, the DoE issued its final Project Continuation Notice confirming the Demonstration Plant’s readiness for operations. This notice, along with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (the “NRC”) operations approval under its previously issued license (received in October 2024), allows for the commencement of Demonstration Plant operations. In November 2024, the Company commenced equipment shakedown and plant commissioning activities, with expected commencement of plant operations in mid-2025.

End-of-Project Goals

The goal of the project is to build and operate a permitted and licensed Demonstration Plant that:

●

demonstrates the separation of NdPr at commercially required purity levels;

●

produces commercial-purity NdPr as well as mixed light/medium REE concentrate, subject to further refining;

●

provides a path for the separation of other rare earths, including Sm, Dy and other essential heavy elements;

Table of Contents

●

provides a basis for economic scale-up to future commercial capacity;

●

provides a basis for the demonstration of improved separation economics with expected fewer process steps and a smaller closed-cycle plant as compared with traditional processing methods; and

●

demonstrates a process which may be capable of processing feed from other sources, either from the U.S. or other allied countries.

Sundance Gold Project

The Sundance Gold Project is the second project located on our Bear Lodge Property. The Sundance Gold Project consists of 288 unpatented lode mining claims adjacent to the Bear Lodge REE Project in Crook County, Wyoming. In 2011, we published an NI 43-101 compliant technical report that now contains ~~dated~~historical estimates of inferred mineral resources on the Sundance Gold Project. As a result of the Company’s current focus on the Bear Lodge REE Project, no drilling or exploration on the Sundance Gold Project has been conducted since the end of 2011 and none is currently planned. We have not done sufficient work to classify the historical estimate as a current estimate of mineral resources, mineral reserves, or exploration results, and we are not treating the estimate as a current estimate of mineral resources, mineral reserves, or exploration results.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not aware of any material pending or threatened litigation or of any proceedings known to be contemplated by governmental authorities which are, or would be, likely to have a material adverse effect ~~upon~~on the Company or our operations, taken as a whole. There are no material proceedings pursuant to which any of our directors, officers or affiliates or any owner of record or beneficial owner of more than 5% of our securities or any associate of any such director, officer or security holder is a party adverse to the Company or has a material interest adverse to itthe Company.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

We consider health, safety, and environmental stewardship to be a core value for the Company.

Pursuant to Section 1503(a) of the Dodd-Frank Act, issuers that are operators, or that have a subsidiary that is an operator, of a coal or other mine in the U.S. are required to disclose in their periodic reports filed with the SEC information regarding specified health and safety violations, orders and citations, related assessments and legal actions, and mining-related fatalities under the regulation of the Mine Safety and Health Administration pursuant to the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Safety and Health Act”). During the year ended December 31, 2023, the Company was not subject to any regulation by the Mine Safety and Health Administration under the Mine Safety and Health Act.

Table of Contents

specified health and safety violations, orders and citations, related assessments and legal actions, and mining-related fatalities under the regulation of the Mine Safety and Health Administration pursuant to the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the “Mine Safety and Health Act”). During the year ended December 31, 2024, the Company was not subject to any regulation by the Mine Safety and Health Administration under the Mine Safety and Health Act.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

MARKET INFORMATION

Our common shares currently trade on the OTCQB Venture Marketplace under the ticker symbol “REEMF.” As of March 1217, ~~2024~~2025, we had approximately 4645 shareholders of record who hold ~~511~~516,~~111~~134,~~557~~712 issued and outstanding common shares.

DIVIDEND POLICY

We do not anticipate that we will declare any dividends in the foreseeable future. Payment of any future dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of the Board of Directors after taking into account many factors, including our operating results, financial conditions, and anticipated cash needs.

Table of Contents

REPURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

During the quarter ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024, neither the Company nor any affiliate of the Company repurchased any common shares of the Company registered under Section 12 of the Exchange Act.

RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTERED SECURITIES

There were no sales of unregistered securities during the year ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024 that were not previously included in a Current Report on Form 8-K or Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of the Company.

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION

As of December 31, ~~2023~~2024, we had two equity compensation plans under which our common shares had been authorized for issuance to our officers, directors, employees, and non-employee consultants: our 10% Rolling Stock Option Plan, as amended and restated (the “2011 Plan”), and our 2022 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2022 Plan”), which was approved by our Board on June 22, 2022 and adopted by our shareholders on August 23, 2022. Stock options are no longer available for grant by the Company under the 2011 Plan.

~~The following table sets out those securities of the Company which have been authorized for issuance under each equity compensation plan at December 31, 2023:~~41

Table of Contents

The following table sets out those securities of the Company which have been authorized for issuance under each equity compensation plan at December 31, 2024:

Equity Compensation Plan Information


				Number of securities remaining
	Number of securities to be	Weighted average		available for future issuance
	issued upon exercise of	exercise price of		under equity compensation plans
	outstanding options and	outstanding options and		(excluding securities reflected in
	rights	rights		column (a))
Plan category	(a)	(b)		(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders
2011 Plan	3,~~455~~385,000	$	1.4750	Nil
2022 Plan	1,~~270~~020,000	$	0.3938	15,966,689
Total	4,~~725~~405,000	$	1.1824	15,966,689

See “Part III Item 11. Executive Compensation” for additional information relating to our equity compensation plans.

CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS

The following discussion is a general summary of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the ownership and disposition of our common shares by a holder of our common shares that is a U.S. Holder (as defined below). This summary is general in nature and does not address the effects of any state or local taxes, U.S. federal estate, gift, or generation-skipping taxes, or the tax consequences in jurisdictions other than the U.S. In addition, this discussion does not discuss all aspects of U.S. federal income taxation that may be material to investors subject to special treatment under U.S. federal income tax law. For example, this discussion does not address all U.S. federal income tax aspects that may be material to U.S. Holders who own or have owned, directly or by the application of certain constructive ownership rules, 10% or more of the outstanding shares of the Company by either vote or by value, U.S. expatriates, insurance companies, tax-exempt entities, financial institutions, persons subject to the alternative minimum tax, or the base erosion and anti-abuse tax, regulated investment companies, securities broker-dealers or dealers, traders in securities who elect to apply a mark-to-market method of accounting, partnerships or other pass-through entities and investors in such an entity, persons holding our securities as part of a larger integrated transaction, persons who acquire our securities as compensation, persons who may be subject to the tax on global intangible low-taxed income, persons who may be eligible for a deduction for a portion of foreign-derived intangible income or global intangible low-tax income, and persons whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar. This summary is based on the U.S. Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), the regulations promulgated thereunder, court decisions and published rulings of the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”), as in effect on the date hereof, and the Convention between the U.S. and Canada with Respect to Taxes on Income and on Capital signed on September 26, 1980, as amended and currently in force (the “Treaty”), and does not take into account the possible effect of future legislative or administrative changes or court decisions. We do not anticipate requesting any rulings from the IRS or obtaining any opinions from counsel on the tax consequences described below, or on any other tax issues. The IRS or a court might reach a contrary conclusion with respect to the issues addressed herein if the matter were to be contested. Future legislative or administrative changes or court decisions may significantly change the conclusions expressed herein, and any such changes or decisions may have a retroactive effect with respect to the matters discussed herein.

Table of Contents

Capital signed on September 26, 1980, as amended and currently in force (the “Treaty”), and does not take into account the possible effect of future legislative or administrative changes or court decisions. We will not request any rulings from the IRS or obtain any opinions from counsel on the tax consequences described below, or on any other issues. The IRS or a court might reach a contrary conclusion with respect to the issues addressed herein if the matter were to be contested. Future legislative or administrative changes or court decisions may significantly change the conclusions expressed herein, and any such changes or decisions may have a retroactive effect with respect to the matters discussed herein.

YOU SHOULD CONSULT YOUR OWN ADVISOR REGARDING THE U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES OF THE ACQUISITION, OWNERSHIP AND DISPOSITION OF OUR COMMON SHARES IN LIGHT OF YOUR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES.

Definition of a U.S. Holder

As used herein, the term “U.S. Holder” means a beneficial owner of our securities that is (a) an individual citizen or resident of the U.S. for U.S. federal income tax purposes; (b) a corporation (or other entity taxable as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized in or under the laws of the U.S. or any state thereof or the District of Columbia; (c) an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or (d) a trust, if (i) a court within the U.S. can exercise primary supervision over the administration of the trust and one or more ~~U.S. persons are authorized to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (ii) a valid election is in effect under applicable Treasury Regulations to treat such trust as a U.S. person.~~

Table of Contents

U.S. persons are authorized to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (ii) a valid election is in effect under applicable Treasury Regulations to treat such trust as a U.S. person.

Passive Foreign Investment Company Rules

We will be classified as a passive foreign investment company (a “PFIC”) in any taxable year in which, after taking into account the income and assets of certain subsidiaries, either (i) at least 75% of our gross income is passive income, or (ii) at least 50% of the average value of our assets is attributable to assets that produce or are held for the production of passive income. Whether we will be classified as a PFIC in any taxable year is a factual determination and will depend upon our assets, the market value of our common shares, and our activities in each year and is therefore subject to change.

We believe that we were a PFIC for the year ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024. We expect that we will be a PFIC for the year ending December 31, ~~2024~~2025, and that we may also be a PFIC for subsequent years. The tests for determining PFIC status are dependent upon a number of factors, some of which are beyond our control and can be subject to uncertainties. Accordingly, we cannot provide certainty that we were or were not a PFIC for the year ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024, or that we will or will not be a PFIC for the year ending December 31, ~~2024~~2025, or for any future year. We will use commercially reasonable efforts to provide information as to our status as a PFIC and the PFIC status of any subsidiary in which the Company owns more than 50% of such subsidiary’s total aggregate voting power to U.S. Holders who make a written request for such information.

If we are classified as a PFIC for any taxable year, the so-called “excess distribution” regime will apply to any U.S. Holder of our common shares that does not make a QEF election or mark-to-market election, as described below. Under the excess distribution regime, (i) any gain the U.S. Holder realizes on the sale or other disposition of our common shares (possibly including a gift, exchange in a corporate reorganization, or grant as security for a loan) and any “excess distribution” that we make to such U.S. Holder (generally, any distributions to such holder in respect of our common shares during a single taxable year that are greater than 125% of the average annual distributions received by such U.S. Holder in the three preceding years or, if shorter, such holder’s holding period for such common shares), will be treated as ordinary income that was earned ratably over each day in such U.S. Holder’s holding period for such common shares; (ii) the portion of any such gains or distributions allocated to the current year or prior years before the first day of the first taxable year beginning after December 31, 1986, in which we became a PFIC would be includible by the U.S. Holder as ordinary income in the current year; (iii) the portion of such gain or distribution that is allocable to prior taxable years during which we were a PFIC will be subject to tax at the highest rate applicable to ordinary income for the relevant taxable years, regardless of the tax rate otherwise applicable to such U.S. Holder and without reduction for deductions or loss carryforwards; and (iv) the interest charge generally applicable to underpayments of tax will be imposed with respect of the tax attributable to each such year. The interest charge discussed above generally will be non-deductible interest expense for individual U.S. Holders.

Table of Contents

Certain elections may be available with respect to our common shares (the so-called “QEF,” “mark-to-market,” and “deemed sale” elections) if we are a PFIC, but these elections may accelerate the recognition of taxable income and may result in the recognition of ordinary income. If the Company is a PFIC for any tax year during which a U.S. Holder holds our common shares, and no such elections have been made, the Company will continue to be treated as a PFIC with respect to such U.S. Holder, regardless of whether the Company ceases to be a PFIC in one or more subsequent years.

If a U.S. Holder makes a timely election to treat the Company as a “qualifying electing fund” or “QEF” (a “QEF election”) with respect to such U.S. Holder’s interest therein, the above-described rules regarding the excess distribution regime generally will not apply. Instead, the electing U.S. Holder would include annually in its gross income its pro rata share of our ordinary earnings and any net capital gain for each taxable year regardless of whether such income or gain was actually distributed. Special rules apply to U.S. Holders who own their interests in a PFIC through intermediate entities or persons.

A U.S. Holder may make a QEF election only if the U.S. Holder receives certain information (known as a “PFIC annual information statement”) from us annually. We will use commercially reasonable efforts to make available to U.S. Holders, upon written request, an accurate PFIC annual information statement for each year in which the Company is a PFIC. A QEF election with respect to our common shares is generally timely filed only if it is made on a timely filed federal income tax return for the first year in the U.S. Holder’s holding period for our common shares in which we were a PFIC. A U.S. Holder for whom a QEF election would otherwise be untimely may be able to make a special “deemed sale” election pursuant to which the U.S. Holder recognizes any gain inherent in the U.S. Holder’s common shares and restarts the U.S. Holder’s holding period in our common shares for purposes of making a QEF election. A deemed sale election generally can be made only if the U.S. Holder owns common shares on the first day of our taxable year in which the election is to be effective.

Table of Contents

Holder for whom a QEF election would otherwise be untimely may be able to make a special “deemed sale” election pursuant to which the U.S. Holder recognizes any gain inherent in the U.S. Holder’s common shares and restarts the U.S. Holder’s holding period in our common shares for purposes of making a QEF election. A deemed sale election generally can be made only if the U.S. Holder owns common shares on the first day of our taxable year in which the election is to be effective.

Alternatively, a U.S. Holder of our common shares may elect to recognize any gain or loss on its common shares on a mark-to-market basis at the end of each taxable year, so long as our common shares are regularly traded on a qualified exchange. The OTCQB Venture Marketplace, on which our common shares currently trade, may not be a qualified exchange for this purpose. Therefore, we cannot provide assurance that our common shares are regularly traded on a qualified exchange for PFIC purposes, and we provide no assurance that our common shares will be regularly traded on a qualified exchange for this or any subsequent year in which we may be a PFIC.

If a mark-to-market election is made, the excess distribution regime will not apply to amounts received with respect to our common shares from and after the effective time of the election, and any mark-to-market gains or gains on disposition will be treated as ordinary income. Mark-to-market losses and losses on disposition will be treated as ordinary losses to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s unrecovered prior net mark-to-market gains. Losses in excess of prior net mark-to-market gains will generally not be recognized. The mark-to-market election must be made by the due date (as may be extended) for filing the U.S. Holder’s federal income tax return for the first year in which the election is to take effect. A mark-to-market election applies to all future years of an electing U.S. Holder during which the stock is regularly traded on a qualifying exchange, unless revoked with the IRS’s consent.

The QEF election and mark-to-market election rules are complex. U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisor regarding the availability and procedure for making these elections.

Special adverse rules apply to U.S. Holders of our common shares for any year in which we are a PFIC and own or dispose of shares in another corporation that is also a PFIC (a “lower-tier PFIC”). A U.S. Holder who owned our common shares while we were a PFIC will be deemed to own its proportionate share of any lower-tier PFIC, and will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on (i) a distribution on the shares of a lower-tier PFIC and (ii) a disposition of shares of a lower-tier PFIC, both as if the U.S. Holder directly held the shares of such lower-tier PFIC. Moreover, a QEF election or mark-to-market election that is made for our common shares would not apply to a lower-tier PFIC. While a separate QEF election may be made for a lower-tier PFIC, we do not undertake to provide the financial information to U.S. Holders that would allow them to make a QEF election for any lower-tier PFIC. A mark-to-market election generally may not be made with respect to a lower-tier PFIC.

A U.S. Holder who makes a QEF election for our common shares but not for shares of a lower-tier PFIC will be taxable under the excess distribution regime on gain that we recognize on the sale of shares of any such lower-tier PFIC. Any U.S. Holder who makes a mark-to-market or deemed sale election for our common shares could be subject to the PFIC rules with respect to income of a lower-tier PFIC, even though the value of such lower-tier PFIC already was subject to tax via mark-to-market or deemed sale adjustments.

Table of Contents

Holder who makes a mark-to-market or deemed sale election for our common shares could be subject to the PFIC rules with respect to income of a lower-tier PFIC, even though the value of such lower-tier PFIC already was subject to tax via mark-to-market or deemed sale adjustments.

The IRS has issued proposed regulations that, subject to certain exceptions, would treat as taxable certain transfers of PFIC stock by a U.S. Holder that has not made a timely QEF election or mark-to-market election that are generally not otherwise taxed, such as gifts, exchanges pursuant to corporate reorganizations, and transfers at death. Generally, in such cases, the basis of our common shares in the hands of the transferee and the basis of any property received in the exchange for those shares would be increased by the amount of gain recognized. The specific tax effect to the U.S. Holder and the transferee may vary based on the manner in which the common shares are transferred. Each U.S. Holder should consult a tax advisor with respect to how the PFIC rules affect their tax situation prior to transferring PFIC shares.

Special adverse rules that impact certain estate planning goals could apply to our common shares if we are a PFIC. Special rules apply with respect to the calculation of the amount of the foreign tax credit with respect to excess distributions by a PFIC.

Table of Contents

Each U.S. Holder that has a direct or indirect interest in our common shares for a year for which we were a PFIC, generally would be required to file an IRS Form 8621 (“Form 8621”), if, during such year, the U.S. Holder received distributions or recognized gain with respect to our common shares, or was deemed to receive an indirect distribution from a lower-tier PFIC or to recognize gain on an indirect disposition of lower-tier PFIC stock, or in such other situations as the IRS may require. Form 8621 is also used to make certain elections with respect to PFICs, including a QEF election and a mark-to-market election. Each U.S. Holder should consult its tax advisor regarding these and any other relevant information or other reporting requirements.

If we are a PFIC in the taxable year in which we pay a dividend or the immediately preceding taxable year, dividends on our common shares will not be “qualified dividend income,” and such dividends received by individual U.S. Holders generally will be taxed at ordinary income tax rates, subject to the tax rules that apply to excess distributions from PFICs, as discussed above.

Sale or Other Disposition of Our Common Shares

The tax treatment of a sale or other disposition of our common shares by a U.S. Holder will differ based upon whether the PFIC rules apply and whether the U.S. Holder has made any of the elections described above.

If the excess distribution regime discussed above applies to the sale or disposition of our common shares, the rules regarding the taxation of excess distributions will generally apply upon a sale or other disposition of the common shares.

If the excess distribution regime discussed above does not apply to the sale or disposition of our common shares, the difference between the amount received and the adjusted tax basis of the common shares will be a gain or loss. If, as usually is the case, the common shares are a capital asset in the hands of the U.S. Holder, such gain or loss will be a capital gain or loss. If the U.S. Holder has made a QEF election with respect to the shares, the adjusted basis will be increased by the U.S. Holder’s proportionate share of income and capital gains taken into account each year as a result of the QEF election. If the U.S. Holder has made a mark-to-market election with respect to the shares, the adjusted basis will be increased by the net income recognized on the common shares as a result of the mark-to-market election. Capital gain or loss with respect to common shares generally will be long-term capital gain or loss if the holding period for the shares giving rise to such gain or loss exceeds one year. Under current law, long-term capital gains realized by individual U.S. Holders are taxed at reduced rates. Short-term capital gains are taxed at ordinary income rates. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to significant limitations.

Distributions

We do not expect to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. However, subject to the PFIC rules discussed below, a U.S. Holder must include in gross income as dividend income the gross amount of any distribution (including the amount of any Canadian withholding tax thereon) paid by the Company out of its current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes) with respect to our common shares. A distribution on our common shares in excess of current or accumulated earnings and profits will be treated as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s adjusted basis in such common shares (thus reducing, but not below zero, the adjusted tax basis of such common shares), and thereafter as gain from the sale or exchange of common shares. See “Sale or Other Disposition of Our Common Shares” above.

Table of Contents

any Canadian withholding tax thereon) paid by the Company out of its current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes) with respect to our common shares. A distribution on our common shares in excess of current or accumulated earnings and profits will be treated as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of the U.S. Holder’s adjusted basis in such common shares (thus reducing, but not below zero, the adjusted tax basis of such common shares), and thereafter as gain from the sale or exchange of common shares. See “Sale or Other Disposition of Our Common Shares” above.

If we are a PFIC in the taxable year in which we pay a dividend or the immediately preceding taxable year, dividends received by individual U.S. Holders generally will be taxed at ordinary income tax rates, subject to the rules that apply to excess distributions from PFICs, as discussed above.

If we are not a PFIC in the taxable year in which we pay a dividend or the immediately preceding taxable year, dividends received by individual U.S. Holders will be taxed to such U.S. Holder at the rates applicable to long-term capital gains as “qualified dividend income” if (i) we are eligible for benefits of the Treaty or (ii) our common shares are readily tradable on an established securities market. We have not determined if we are eligible for such benefits, and our common shares are not currently readily tradable on an established securities market. However, dividend income will not be qualified dividend income (and will be taxed at ordinary income rates) if the U.S. Holder has not held its common shares for at least 61 days during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date (or as noted above, if we are a PFIC for the taxable year in which the dividend is paid or in the preceding taxable year).

Table of Contents

dividend income (and will be taxed at ordinary income rates) if the U.S. Holder has not held its common shares for at least 61 days during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the ex-dividend date (or as noted above, if we are a PFIC for the taxable year in which the dividend is paid or in the preceding taxable year).

Dividends paid to a corporate U.S. Holder will be taxed as ordinary income and will not generally be eligible for the dividends received deduction.

Surcharge on Net Investment Income; Other Tax Rules

A surtax of 3.8% (the “unearned income Medicare contribution tax”) is imposed on the “net investment income” of certain U.S. citizens and resident aliens, and on the undistributed “net investment income” of certain estates and trusts, in each case in excess of a threshold amount. Net investment income generally includes dividends and net gain from the disposition of property (other than property held in a “non-passive” trade or business). Net investment income is reduced by deductions that are properly allocable to such income. Special rules determine when the unearned income Medicare contribution tax applies to distributions or income with respect to PFICs. U.S. Holders should consult with their U.S. tax advisors concerning how these rules would apply to an investment in our common shares.

Foreign Currency Transactions

Generally, amounts received by a U.S. Holder in foreign currency (including dividends paid in foreign currency) will be valued at the rate of exchange on the date of receipt. The subsequent disposition of any foreign currency received (including an exchange for U.S. currency) will generally give rise to ordinary gain or loss should the rate of exchange subsequently change.

Foreign Tax Credit or Deduction

A U.S. Holder who pays (or has withheld from distributions) Canadian income tax with respect to the ownership of our common shares may be entitled, at the election of the U.S. Holder, to either receive a deduction or a tax credit for U.S. federal income tax purposes with respect to such foreign tax paid or withheld. Significant and complex limitations apply to the foreign tax credit, including the general limitation that the credit cannot exceed the proportionate share of the U.S. Holder’s U.S. income tax liability that the U.S. Holder’s “foreign source” income bears to his or its worldwide taxable income. In applying this limitation, the various items of income and deduction must be classified as either “foreign source” or “U.S. source.” Complex rules govern this classification process.

In lieu of a credit, a U.S. Holder who itemizes deductions may elect to deduct all of such holder’s foreign taxes in the taxable year. A deduction does not reduce U.S. tax on a dollar-for-dollar basis like a tax credit, but the deduction for foreign taxes is not subject to the same limitations applicable to foreign tax credits. U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the availability of foreign tax credits.

Table of Contents

A U.S. Holder’s ability to use foreign tax credits could be adversely affected if we are a PFIC.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

Certain U.S. Holders are required to report information relating to an interest in our common shares, subject to certain exceptions, by attaching a completed IRS Form 8938, Statement of Specified Foreign Financial Assets, with their tax return for each year in which they hold an interest in our common shares or warrants. U.S. Holders are urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding information reporting requirements relating to their ownership of our common shares.

Dividend payments made with respect to our common shares and proceeds from the sale or other disposition of our common shares may be subject to information reporting requirements and to U.S. backup withholding.

In general, backup withholding will apply, currently at a rate of 24%, with respect to reportable payments made to a U.S. Holder unless (i) the U.S. Holder is a corporation or other exempt recipient, and if required, demonstrates such exemption, or (ii) the U.S. Holder furnishes the payor with a taxpayer identification number on IRS Form W-9 in the manner required, certifies under penalty of perjury that such U.S. Holder is not currently subject to backup withholding and otherwise complies with the backup withholding requirements.

Table of Contents

or (ii) the U.S. Holder furnishes the payor with a taxpayer identification number on IRS Form W-9 in the manner required, certifies under penalty of perjury that such U.S. Holder is not currently subject to backup withholding and otherwise complies with the backup withholding requirements.

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Rather, the amount of any backup withholding imposed on a payment to a holder will be allowed as a refund or a credit against such holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability, provided that the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.

ITEM 6. [RESERVED]

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report. This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.” Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of many factors, including, but not limited to, those set forth in “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Annual Report.

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes included in Item 8 of this Annual Report. This Management’s Discussion and Analysis (this “MD&A”) has been prepared based on information known to management as of March 1921, ~~2024~~2025. This MD&A is intended to help the reader understand the consolidated audited financial statements of the Company.

All currency amounts are expressed in thousands of U.S. dollars, except per share and common share amounts, unless otherwise noted.

OVERVIEW AND OUTLOOK

Our primary focus has been and continues to be the engineering, permitting, licensing, construction, and operation of the Demonstration Plant ~~at the planned location site in Upton, Wyoming~~. If successful, ~~this~~the Demonstration Plant will show that our ~~propriety~~proprietary extraction technology is able to process and separate certain REEs from high grade sample materials extracted from our Bear Lodge REE Project in a more efficient and economical manner than traditional REE processing methods and will serve as a precursor to inform the design and estimated cost for a future full-scale production facility.

~~During~~Throughout ~~2023~~2024, the Company, along with the other consortium members, continued their work on the Demonstration Plant project, and this work is expected to continue ~~through~~until the completion of the project’s ~~expected~~operations. ~~completion~~In ~~date~~September 2024, the DoE issued its final Project Continuation Notice, confirming the Demonstration Plant’s readiness for operations. This notice, along with the NRC’s approval of operations received in ~~2025~~October 2024, cleared the path for operations of the Demonstration Plant to formally commence, with operations to process and separate the REE from the stockpiled mineral sample to follow the completion of construction activities. InDuring ~~December~~the ~~2022~~production phase, which is expected to commence in mid-2025, the Demonstration Plant is expected to produce up to 10 tons (9.1 tonnes) of NdPr oxide.

46In June 2023, the Company entered into the WEA Funding Agreement for its previously announced award of a $4,400 grant from the WEA to be used toward the advancement of the Demonstration Plant. This award, along with funds contributed by the Company and the DoE, is being used to fund the Demonstration Plant’s construction and operating costs. As of December 31, 2023, the Company had met the conditions allowing for the invoicing of $2,000 of the $4,400 WEA grant total. This $2,000 was subsequently received on January 31, 2024. By September 30, 2024, the Company had met the conditions allowing for the invoicing of an additional $2,000, which was subsequently received in November 2024. The remaining $400 of the $4,400 grant total, which is conditioned on the achievement of other, future milestones, will be invoiced to the WEA once those final milestones have been achieved (expected in mid-2025).

Table of Contents

Since inception, the General Atomics-led consortium has seen increases in the Demonstration Plant ~~achieved~~project ~~its~~costs, including expected final ~~engineering~~equipment ~~design~~costs, ~~milestone~~due ~~marking~~to, ~~the~~among ~~completion~~other factors, inflation. As a result of these cost pressures, General Atomics, on behalf of the consortium, submitted to the DoE’s ~~first~~an ~~go/no-go~~updated ~~decision~~Demonstration ~~point.~~Plant ~~The~~construction ~~completion~~and operations budget of ~~this~~approximately ~~milestone~~$53,600, ~~was~~which ais ~~gating~~approximately ~~event~~21% ~~for~~higher than the ~~DoE’s~~original ~~continued~~budget ~~funding~~ of approximately $43,800. In response, the ~~project~~DoE aspledged ~~provided~~an ~~for~~additional incommitment ~~the~~of ~~2021~~$2,400 ~~award~~to ~~grant.~~help Afund ~~second~~a ~~milestone~~portion ~~was~~of ~~achieved~~this budget increase, with the ~~completion~~balance ofto ~~permitting~~be ~~activities~~funded inby the ~~fourth~~Company, ~~quarter~~including any amounts in excess of ~~2023~~the $53,600 ~~allowing~~revised ~~for~~DoE approved budget. Even with this increase, the Company now expects that the full Demonstration Plant’s ~~construction.~~project ~~Operations~~costs, toonce ~~process~~operations are complete, will exceed the higher, revised DoE budget total of $53,600 and ~~separate~~has advised the ~~REE~~DoE ~~from~~that it will use Company funds, to the ~~stockpiled~~extent ~~mineral~~it ~~sample~~is ~~are~~unable ~~expected~~to secure other external funding sources, to ~~follow~~cover ~~the~~those ~~completion~~costs ofabove the ~~Demonstration~~DoE ~~Plant’s~~approved ~~construction~~cost-share ~~for~~budget, annow ~~additional~~estimated ~~12-~~to ~~15-month~~be ~~period~~approximately $66,000.

InTo ~~June~~fund ~~2023~~the Company’s share of these cost increases, the Company ~~entered~~announced, ~~into~~during December 2023, its intention to launch a ~~Funding~~rights ~~Agreement~~offering. ~~with~~In March 2024, the ~~WEA~~Company ~~for~~completed ~~its~~the ~~previously~~rights ~~announced~~offering ~~award~~(the “2024 Rights Offering”) for gross proceeds of aapproximately $435,~~400~~800, ~~grant~~in ~~from~~which ~~the~~each ~~WEA~~holder toof bethe ~~used~~Company’s ~~toward~~common ~~the~~shares ~~advancement~~as of the ~~Demonstration~~record ~~Plant.~~date ~~This~~of ~~award~~December 15, ~~along~~2023, ~~with~~was ~~the~~eligible ~~funds~~to ~~raised~~participate. The proceeds from the ~~Company’s~~2024 ~~2021~~Rights ~~rights~~Offering ~~offering,~~are ~~will~~being be used to ~~fund~~progress the Company’s ~~fifty~~business ~~percent~~strategy ~~(50%)~~to ~~share~~support commercialization, which includes funding the operation of the Demonstration Plant’s ~~originally~~for ~~estimated~~a ~~cost~~period of ~~approximately~~time ~~$43,800~~that ~~with~~is ~~the~~expected ~~other~~to ~~fifty~~be ~~percent~~sufficient ofto provide the ~~funding~~information ~~coming~~to ~~from~~support ~~the~~a ~~DoE~~commercialization decision, as well as for other general corporate purposes. ~~Through~~Even ~~December 31~~with these funds, ~~2023~~however, the Company ~~had~~will ~~paid~~still arequire ~~total~~substantial ofadditional ~~$15~~funds for the permitting,~~700~~ ~~toward~~development, ~~its~~and ~~share~~build-out of the ~~expected~~Bear ~~cost~~Lodge ofREE ~~the~~Project. ~~Demonstration~~Ultimately, ~~Plant~~in ~~(see~~the ~~Note~~event 4the toCompany ~~our~~cannot ~~Consolidated~~secure ~~Financial~~additional ~~Statements~~financial ~~for~~resources, or complete a ~~more~~strategic ~~complete~~transaction ~~discussion).~~in Asthe oflonger ~~December 31~~term, ~~2023,~~ the Company ~~had~~may ~~met~~need ~~the~~to ~~conditions~~curtail ~~allowing~~or ~~for~~suspend ~~the~~its ~~invoicing~~operational ofplans ~~$2,000~~regarding of the ~~$4,400~~Bear ~~WEA~~Lodge ~~grant~~REE ~~total~~Project ~~but~~or noother ~~grant~~initiatives, ~~funds~~or ~~had~~potentially ~~yet~~liquidate ~~been~~its ~~received.~~business ~~This $2~~interests,~~000~~ ~~was~~and ~~subsequently~~investors ~~received~~may onlose ~~January 31,~~all ~~2024~~or ~~(see~~part ~~Note~~of 14their ~~– Subsequent Events)~~investment.

Since inception, the General Atomics-led consortium has seen increases in the Demonstration Plant project costs, including expected final equipment costs, due to, among other factors, inflation. Accordingly, the project team has commenced discussions with the DoE and other government agencies regarding further cost-sharing opportunities to offset the increase in the anticipated project costs and further project objectives. In part to fund the Company’s share of these cost increases, the Company announced, during December 2023, its intention to launch a rights offering to raise approximately $36,000 in gross proceeds. In March 2024, the Company completed the rights offering for gross proceeds of approximately $35,800 in which each holder of the Company’s common shares as of the record date of December 15, 2023 was eligible to participate. The proceeds from this rights offering will be used to progress the Company’s business strategy to support commercialization and fund activities to support the advancement of the Bear Lodge REE Project, which includes funding the operation of the Demonstration Plant for a period of time that is expected to be sufficient to provide the information to support a commercialization decision, acquiring real property, updating the mineral resource model and technical reports, and advancing permitting, environmental support, and basic engineering, as well as for other general corporate purposes. Even with these funds, however, the Company will still require substantial additional funds for the full permitting, development, and buildout of the Bear Lodge REE Project. Ultimately, in the event the Company cannot secure additional financial resources, or complete a strategic transaction in the longer term, the Company may need to curtail or suspend its operational plans regarding the Bear Lodge REE Project or other initiatives, or potentially liquidate its business interests, and investors may lose all or part of their investment.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Year Ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024 Compared with the Year Ended December 31, ~~2022~~2023

Summary

Our consolidated net loss for the year ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024 was $818,~~996~~451, or $0.04 per share, compared with our consolidated net loss of $98,~~426~~996, or $0.04 per share, for the same period in ~~2022~~2023. The loss per share amounts in each year of $0.04 were approximately the same due to the greater number of shares outstanding at December 31, 2024 as compared to December 31, 2023 as a result of the shares issued in the 2024 Rights Offering. See our discussion below for the primary drivers of this change. As an exploration stage company, we had no properties in production and generated no revenues during either year.

Exploration and Evaluation

Our exploration and evaluation costs totaled $818,~~242~~479 for the year ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024, compared with $48,~~155~~242 for the same period in ~~2022~~2023. This increase of $410,~~087~~237 was largely attributable to the activities associated with our Bear Lodge REE Project and the Demonstration Plant as work progressed under the Cost Share Agreement (as defined below). See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a more complete discussion of ~~this~~the Cost Share Agreement.

Table of Contents

Corporate Administration

Our corporate administration costs decreased by $~~2,278~~162 on a comparative year-over-year basis, falling from $52,~~106~~828 in the year ended December 31, ~~2022~~2023 to $2,~~828~~666 for the year ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024. This decrease was largely ~~driven~~attributable byto areductions ~~decrease~~ in our stock~~-based~~ ~~compensation~~option ~~costs~~expense of $2505,~~453~~ partially offset by increases in our employee wages and benefits expenses of $304.

Interest Income

For the years ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024 and ~~2022~~2023, the Company generated interest income of $~~476~~1,182 and $~~258~~476, respectively, on investments of its ~~excess~~ cash ~~balances~~holdings. The increase in ~~2023~~2024 interest income was primarily the result of the ~~substantially higher short-term interest rates that existed during the year, partially offset by the lower average cash balances available for investment during the year ended December 31, 2023.~~

Table of Contents

substantially higher average cash balances available for investment during the year ended December 31, 2024 due to the funds raised in the 2024 Rights Offering, which closed in March 2024.

Grant Income

During each of the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2024, the Company recognized grant income of $2,000, with the achievement of the first ~~milestone~~and second milestones, respectively, under the WEA Funding Agreement. ~~There were no such transactions for the year ended December 31, 2022.~~ See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a more complete discussion of the WEA Funding Agreement.

Accretion Expense

For the years ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024 and ~~2022~~2023, we recorded accretion expense of $~~283~~236 and $~~284~~283, respectively, related to the Company’s option to repurchase approximately 640 acres (257 hectares) of non-core real property in Wyoming for not less than $1,200 or greater than $1,850 in the form of cash, common shares of the Company, or a combination of cash and common shares of the Company. Accretion expense iswas recorded each reporting period to increase the Repurchase Option liability to the maximum exercise price of $1,850, less any annual option payments of $25. With the Company’s repurchase of this land during October 2024, the Company discontinued its recording of accretion expense and will not incur accretion expense in future periods. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a more complete discussion of the Repurchase Option.

FINANCIAL POSITION, LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities ~~increased~~was by $210,~~307,~~619 ~~rising to $11,706~~ for the year ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024, ~~from~~compared with $911,~~399~~706 for the ~~year~~same ~~ended~~period ~~December 31~~in 2023, ~~2022.~~despite ~~This~~an ~~change~~overall ~~was~~increase ~~largely~~in ~~attributable~~amounts tospent during the ~~$2,300~~2024 ~~increase~~year inon ~~cash~~operating ~~advances~~activities ~~paid~~of ~~under~~$9,560. ~~the~~This ~~Cost~~decrease ~~Share~~in ~~Agreement~~net ~~during~~cash ~~the~~used ~~year~~of ~~ended December 31~~$1,087 ~~2023~~was aslargely ~~compared~~attributable to the ~~year~~collection ~~ended~~during ~~December 31,~~2024 ~~2022.~~of ~~For~~ the ~~years~~$4,000 ~~ended~~in ~~December 31,~~WEA ~~2023~~grant ~~and~~funds ~~2022,~~along with the ~~Company~~credits ~~advanced~~to ~~funds~~the ofCompany ~~$9,000~~for ~~and~~amounts ~~$6,700,~~previously ~~respectively,~~advanced ~~under~~to ~~the~~General ~~Cost~~Atomics ~~Share~~of ~~Agreement~~$4,329 for ~~work~~costs incurred on the Demonstration Plant.

Investing Activities

~~Net~~For ~~cash used in investing activities of $4 for~~ the ~~year~~years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, ~~resulted~~our ~~from~~investing aactivities ~~$12~~consumed ~~sale~~cash of ~~non-essential equipment~~$1,559 ~~offset~~and ~~by a~~ $164, ~~purchase~~respectively, ofwith ~~equipment.~~the ~~There~~majority ~~were~~of nothe ~~similar~~2024 ~~transactions~~spending ~~during~~related to the ~~year~~Land ~~ended~~Repurchase ~~December 31,~~of ~~2022~~$1,507.

Financing Activities

During the year ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024, the Company received ~~$31~~net ~~from~~cash ~~the~~proceeds ~~exercise~~ of ~~455~~$35,~~000~~286 ~~stock~~from ~~options.~~the ~~There~~2024 ~~was~~Rights noOffering. ~~cash~~For ~~received~~the ~~from~~year ~~stock~~ended ~~option~~December ~~exercises~~31, ~~during~~2023, ~~2022~~the as$6 ~~all~~of ~~stock~~net ~~option~~financing ~~exercises~~activities ~~were~~stemmed ~~net~~from ~~share~~the ~~settled.~~$31 ~~Additionally,~~received ~~during~~from ~~2023~~the ~~and~~exercise ~~2022,~~of ~~the~~stock ~~Company~~options, ~~made~~partially ~~payments~~offset ofby the $25 ~~each~~payment ~~year~~made to extend the Repurchase Option for an additional 12-month term.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At December 31, ~~2023~~2024, we had a working capital balance of $724,~~809~~821 which represented aan ~~decrease~~increase of $917,~~819~~012 from our December 31, ~~2022~~2023 working capital balance of $177,~~628~~809. This ~~decrease~~increase was largely the result of the $35,286 in net proceeds received from the 2024 Rights Offering, partially offset by increased amounts paid by the Company during the year ended December 31, 2024 under the Cost Share Agreement (as defined below) and for the payment of other ongoing expenses.

48In June 2023, the Company entered into the WEA Funding Agreement for its previously announced award of a $4,400 grant from the WEA to be used toward the advancement of the Demonstration Plant. Following the achievement of the first milestone under the WEA Funding Agreement, the Company received in January 2024 the first $2,000 of the $4,400 grant. In September 2024, a second funding request of $2,000 was submitted to the WEA with the achievement of the

Table of Contents

~~Company~~second ~~during~~milestone ~~the year ended December 31, 2023~~ under the ~~Cost~~WEA ~~Share~~Funding Agreement. The collection of this second $92,000 ~~and~~tranche ~~for~~was ~~the~~received ~~payment~~in ofNovember ~~other~~2024, ~~ongoing~~with ~~expenses~~the ~~being~~remainder, ~~partially~~or ~~offset by~~ the $2400 retainer,~~000~~ ~~increase~~forecasted infor ~~the~~collection ~~WEA~~in ~~grant receivable balance~~mid-2025.

InDue ~~June~~to ~~2023~~inflationary cost pressures on labor, ~~the~~equipment, ~~Company~~and ~~entered~~consumables, ~~into~~as ~~the~~well ~~WEA~~as ~~Funding~~cost ~~Agreement~~increases ~~for~~associated ~~its~~with ~~previously~~certain ~~announced~~optimized ~~award~~plant ofengineering aand $4design parameters,~~400~~ ~~grant~~General ~~from~~Atomics, ~~the~~on ~~WEA~~behalf toof bethe ~~used~~consortium, ~~toward~~submitted to the ~~advancement~~DoE ofan ~~the~~updated Demonstration Plant. ~~The~~project ~~WEA~~budget ~~grant~~of isapproximately a$53,600, ~~cost-reimbursement~~which ~~award that~~ is ~~available~~approximately to21% ~~the~~higher ~~Company~~than ~~for~~ the ~~reimbursement~~original budget of ~~Demonstration~~approximately ~~Plant expenses~~$43,800. AsIn ~~of December 31~~response, ~~2023,~~ the ~~WEA~~DoE ~~had~~pledged ~~been~~an ~~invoiced~~additional ~~for~~commitment ~~the~~of ~~first~~ $2,~~000~~400 of(increasing ~~the~~its total commitment to approximately $424,~~400~~300) ~~grant~~in ~~total~~September ~~for~~2024 ~~the~~to ~~achievement~~help fund a portion of ~~the~~this ~~first~~budget ~~milestone~~increase, ~~under~~with the ~~WEA~~balance ~~Funding~~to ~~Agreement.~~be ~~The~~funded by the Company, ~~received~~including ~~payment~~any amounts in excess of ~~this~~the $253,~~000~~600 inrevised ~~January~~budget ~~2024.~~total, ~~The~~now ~~remaining~~estimated to be approximately $266,~~400,~~000. ~~which~~The isfunds ~~conditioned~~raised onby the ~~achievement~~Company ofin ~~future~~the ~~milestones,~~2024 ~~will~~Rights beOffering ~~invoiced~~are expected to support the ~~WEA~~operations ~~upon~~of ~~achievement~~the Demonstration Plant for a sufficient period of ~~those~~time ~~milestones~~to gather the information necessary for a commercialization decision.

Inclusive of amounts already advanced of $15,700 through December 31, 2023, the Company’s share of the total costs under the Cost Share Agreement are expected to exceed $22,000 over the life of the Demonstration Plant project. As a result, the project team has commenced discussions with the DoE and other government agencies regarding further cost-sharing opportunities to offset the increase in the anticipated project cost and further project objectives. To address these further funding needs, the Company announced on December 5, 2023 its intention to launch a rights offering to raise approximately $36,000 in gross proceeds. In March 2024, the Company completed the rights offering for gross proceeds of approximately $35,800 in which each holder of the Company’s common shares as of the record date of December 15, 2023 was eligible to participate.

With the funds raised from the 2024 ~~rights~~Rights ~~offering~~Offering, the Company ~~will~~expects to have sufficient funds to complete ~~construction~~commissioning and operation of the Demonstration Plant; however, even with these funds and the expected receipt of the remaining WEA grant monies, the Company will still require substantial additional funds to complete ~~fully~~ the permitting and licensing, and ultimate construction and operation of a commercial mine and plant for the Bear Lodge REE Project. Ultimately, in the event the Company cannot secure additional financial resources, or complete a strategic transaction in the longer term, the Company may need to curtail or suspend its operational plans regarding the Bear Lodge REE Project or other initiatives, or potentially liquidate its business interests, and investors may lose all or part of their investment.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

~~We have no off-balance sheet arrangements required to be disclosed in this Annual Report~~None.

Contractual Obligations

Cost Share Agreement – Related Party

On November 30, 2021, the Company and General Atomics entered into a ~~Cost~~cost ~~Share~~share ~~Funding~~agreement ~~Assumption Agreement~~ (the “Cost Share Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to assume and pay for ~~certain~~the non-federal ~~costs~~share of funds incurred by, ~~General~~and ~~Atomics~~on ~~and~~behalf ~~the~~of, ~~consortium~~General Atomics for the design, construction, and operation of athe ~~rare earth separation and processing~~ Demonstration Plant ~~near the Bear Lodge REE Project in Upton, Wyoming~~.

AsOn ~~previously~~May ~~discussed~~16, ~~in January 2021~~2024, the ~~DoE~~Company ~~announced~~and ~~that~~General aAtomics ~~consortium~~entered ofinto ~~companies,~~an ~~which~~extension ~~includes~~agreement to the ~~Company,~~Cost ~~led~~Share byAgreement ~~General~~under ~~Atomics,~~which anthe ~~affiliate~~Company ofagreed ~~Synchron,~~to ~~and~~make ~~certain~~additional ofcash ~~its affiliates~~advances, ~~and~~up ~~LNV,~~to ~~an Ardurra Group~~$2, ~~Inc. company~~500, asto ~~engineering~~General ~~and~~Atomics ~~construction~~while ~~subcontractor,~~the ~~was~~parties ~~selected~~progressed ~~for~~an aamendment ~~potential~~to ~~financial award in~~ the ~~amount~~Cost ofShare ~~$21,900~~Agreement ~~for~~covering the ~~engineering,~~Company’s ~~construction~~share ~~and~~of ~~operation~~the ofadditional anon-federal ~~rare~~project ~~earth~~funding ~~separation~~needed ~~and~~for ~~processing~~the ~~Demonstration~~project’s ~~Plant~~completion. ~~The~~ ~~DoE~~As ~~award~~of ~~was~~March ~~finalized~~21, ~~through a cooperative agreement dated October 1~~2025, ~~2021 (~~the ~~“Cooperative~~amendment ~~Agreement”)~~to ~~between General Atomics and~~ the ~~DoE~~Cost ~~with~~Share ~~respect~~Agreement towas in the ~~engineering,~~process ~~permitting,~~of ~~and~~being ~~licensing~~finalized, ~~construction,~~with ~~and~~completion ~~operation~~now ofexpected ~~the~~in ~~Demonstration Plant~~mid-2025. ~~The~~See ~~Cooperative~~Note ~~Agreement~~4 ~~provides that up~~ to ~~approximately~~the ~~$43,800~~Consolidated inFinancial ~~allowable~~Statements ~~costs~~ for ~~the Demonstration Plant would be funded on~~ a ~~cost-share~~more ~~basis,~~complete ~~50%~~discussion byof the ~~DoE~~Cost ~~and~~Share ~~50% by a non-federal entity~~Agreement.

Pursuant to the terms of the Cost Share Agreement, the Company is obligated to make payments totaling $21,900 to General Atomics, as leader of the consortium, for its share of the assumed costs for the Demonstration Plant, $15,700 of which had been paid through December 31, 2023.

Table of Contents

The term of the Cost Share Agreement will continue until the date of completion of the Demonstration Plant, unless terminated earlier by either party. Either party may terminate the Cost Share Agreement immediately upon written notice to the other party if any of the following events occurs: (a) the Cooperative Agreement is terminated for any reason prior to the completion of the Demonstration Plant; (b) the other party commits a material breach of its obligations under the Cost Share Agreement and fails to cure such breach within 30 days; or (c) the other party makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, files a petition in bankruptcy, is adjudicated insolvent or bankrupt, or commences any insolvency or bankruptcy proceedings. Upon any early termination of the Cost Share Agreement, the Company must pay for all costs incurred by or on behalf of General Atomics to wind down the Demonstration Plant other than any allowable costs for such wind-down paid for by the DoE.

Intellectual Property Rights – Related Party

During October 2017, the Company and Synchron executed an intellectual property rights agreement, whereby Synchron received rights to use and improve the Company’s intellectual property relating to the Company’s patents and related technical information. The Company retains the right to use any such improvements. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Annual Report.

Land Purchase Option

On October 25, 2021, the Company and Whitelaw Creek ~~LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company (“Whitelaw Creek”),~~ entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the asset purchase agreement dated October 20, 2016 between the Company and Whitelaw Creek (the “~~Asset Purchase Agreement~~APA”). The Amendment modified certain provisions of the ~~Asset~~APA ~~Purchase Agreement~~ related to the terms and conditions of the Company’s option to repurchase (the “Repurchase Option”) approximately 640 acres of(257 ~~non-core~~hectares) of real property located in Crook County, Wyoming, that iswas under consideration for a ~~waste~~stockpile ~~rock~~ facility for the Bear Lodge REE Project. Pursuant to ~~and subject to~~ the terms of the ~~Amendment~~APA, ~~among~~as other things, the term of the Repurchase Option (which was to expire on October 26, 2021) was extended for up to three additional years, subject to annual option extension payments from the Company to Whitelaw Creek of $25 in cash per year (each, a “Repurchase Option Extension Payment”); and the exercise price of the Repurchase Option was increased from $1,000 to a price to be determined by a mutually agreed upon real estate appraiser (the “Repurchase Price”), provided that (i) the Repurchase Price must not be less than $1,200 or greater than $1,850 and (ii) any Repurchase Option Extension Payments paid by the Company to Whitelaw Creek must be credited toward the Company’s payment of the Repurchase Price if the Repurchase Option is later exercised. In October 2023, the Company made the $25 Repurchase Option Extension Payment to Whitelaw Creek to extend the term of the Repurchase Option through October 26, 2024.

Table of Contents

extended, RER exercised its option to repurchase the Section 16 property, and on October 21, 2024, entered into a purchase agreement with Whitelaw Creek to repurchase the property (the “Land Repurchase”). The Land Repurchase closed on October 25, 2024 (the “Closing Date”). As consideration for the Land Repurchase, on the Closing Date, the Company (i) issued 5,000,000 of its common shares to Whitelaw Creek having a Closing Date fair value of $1,950 and (ii) paid Whitelaw Creek $1,507 in cash.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

For a summary of our significant accounting policies, including those discussed below, see Note 3 to our Consolidated Financial Statements.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. ~~The amounts which involve significant estimates include reclamation obligations and income tax.~~

Reclamation Obligations

Our mining and exploration activities are subject to various laws and regulations, including legal and contractual obligations to reclaim, remediate, or otherwise restore properties at the time the property is removed from service. Reclamation obligations are recognized when incurred and recorded as liabilities at fair value. The reclamation obligation is based on when spending for an existing disturbance will occur. We reclaim the disturbance from our exploration programs on an ongoing basis and, therefore, the portion of our reclamation obligation corresponding to our exploration programs will be settled in the near term and is classified as a current liability. The remaining reclamation associated with environmental monitoring programs is classified as a long-term liability; however, because we have not declared proven and probable reserves as defined by Item 1300 of Regulation S-K or NI 43-101, the timing of these reclamation activities is uncertain as the reclamation areas will be utilized once the project is operating. For exploration stage properties that do not qualify for asset capitalization, the costs associated with the obligation are charged to operations. For development and production stage properties, the costs are added to the capitalized costs of the property and amortized using the units-of-production method. We review, on a quarterly basis, unless otherwise deemed necessary, the reclamation obligation associated with our properties.

Table of Contents

programs on an ongoing basis and, therefore, the portion of our reclamation obligation corresponding to our exploration programs will be settled in the near term and is classified as a current liability. The remaining reclamation associated with environmental monitoring programs is classified as a long-term liability; however, because we have not declared proven and probable reserves as defined under Item 1300 of Regulation S-K, the timing of these reclamation activities is uncertain as the reclamation areas will be utilized once the project is operating. For exploration stage properties that do not qualify for asset capitalization, the costs associated with the obligation are charged to operations. For development and production stage properties, the costs are added to the capitalized costs of the property and amortized using the units-of-production method. We review, on a quarterly basis, unless otherwise deemed necessary, the reclamation obligation associated with our properties.

Our Bear Lodge REE Project reclamation obligation is secured by a surety bond held for the benefit of the state of Wyoming in an amount determined by the applicable federal or state regulatory agency. We also maintain a surety bond for the reclamation of the Demonstration Plant property.

Accounting for reclamation and remediation obligations requires management to make estimates unique to each mining and processing operation of the future costs the Company expects to incur to complete the reclamation and remediation work required to comply with existing laws and regulations. These estimates require considerable judgment and are sensitive to changes in underlying inputs and assumptions. Such changes, including, but not limited to, (i) changes to environmental laws and regulations, which could increase the scope and extent of work required, (ii) changes in the timing of reclamation and remediation activities, which could occur over an extended future period and (iii) changes in the methods and technology utilized to settle reclamation and remediation obligations, could have a material impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Income Taxes

The Company applies the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 740 Income Taxes. The Standard requires an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for income taxes and the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities at enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when such amounts are realized or settled. Due to losses from inception, the Company has no tax liability. Currently, the Company has no ~~deferred taxes arising from temporary differences between income for financial reporting and income tax purposes as a full valuation allowance has been recorded against the deferred tax assets.~~

~~The Company classifies tax-related penalties and net interest on income taxes as income tax expense. As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, no income tax expense had been incurred or accrued.~~51

Table of Contents

deferred taxes arising from temporary differences between income for financial reporting and income tax purposes as a full valuation allowance has been recorded against the deferred tax assets.

The Company classifies tax-related penalties and net interest on income taxes as income tax expense. As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, no income tax expense had been incurred or accrued.

New Accounting Pronouncements

As of December 31, ~~2023~~2024, the Company had adopted all accounting pronouncements affecting the Company.

During 2024, we adopted ASU 2023-07, Segment Reporting (Topic 280): Improvements to Reportable Segment Disclosures. Management has evaluated the Company’s operations and concluded it has one reportable operating segment. This standard has not changed the processing, recording, or presentation of our financial data.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The following Consolidated Financial Statements and Reports of Independent Registered Public Accountants are filed as part of this Item 8 and are included in this Annual Report. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

5152

Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and
Stockholders of Rare Element Resources, Ltd.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Rare Element Resources Ltd. (the Company) as of December 31, ~~2023~~2024 and ~~2022,~~2023 and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity ~~(deficit)~~, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, ~~2023~~2024 and ~~2022~~2023, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Cost Share Agreement – Refer to Note 4 to the financial statements

As discussed in Note 4 to the financial statements, the Company is a member of a consortium of companies, led by General Atomics, a related party, who are developing a Demonstration Plant (the project) that will process high-grade rare-earth material. In connection with the arrangement, the Company entered into a cost share agreement with General Atomics, in which the Company agreed to assume and pay for 50% of those costs incurred by, and on behalf of, General Atomics, as leader of the consortium, for the project.

We consider management’s assessment and accounting of the cost share agreement as a significant audit matter because of the significant judgements required by management to determine the activity completed in accordance with the agreements. This required a high degree of auditor judgement and an increased extent of effort to address these matters.

Addressing the matter involved gaining an understanding of the process to account for the cost share agreement. We obtained and interpreted the cost share agreement and subcontracts to ensure the amounts were consistently applied. We evaluated management’s analysis and compared that to applicable accounting guidance. Finally, we obtained the ~~Company’s fund flows and examined the costs used in their calculation to ensure they were in accordance with the agreements.~~

/s/ Haynie & Company

Haynie and Company

Salt Lake City, Utah

March 19, 2024

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2022.

Table of Contents

Company’s fund flows and examined the costs used in their calculation to ensure they were in accordance with the agreements.

Haynie & Company

Salt Lake City, Utah

March 21, 2025

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2022.

Table of Contents

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except shares outstanding)


	December 31,
	~~2023~~2024		~~2022~~2023
ASSETS:
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	326,~~633~~732	$	153,~~523~~633
Grant receivable (Note 5)		~~2,000~~—		—2,000
Due from related party (Note 4)		~~179~~—		~~174~~179
Prepaid to related party (Note 4)		~~3,435~~—		23,~~142~~435
Prepaid expenses and other		~~503~~215		~~140~~503
Total Current Assets		926,~~750~~947		179,~~979~~750

Equipment, net		2965		1529
Restricted cash		~~186~~195		—186
Right of use asset (Note 6)		~~179~~238		~~273~~179
Investment in land (Note 8)		600		600
Land (Note 8)		2,240		600
Total Assets	$	1029,~~744~~685	$	1810,~~867~~744

LIABILITIES:
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	~~291~~1,059	$	~~227~~291
Repurchase option (Note 8)		1,539		—
Due to related party (Note 4)		895		—
Lease liability, current (Note 6)		111		124
Repurchase option (Note 8)		—		1,539
Total Current Liabilities		1,941		351
Lease liability, current (Note 6)		172		111
Total Current Liabilities		2,126		1,941

Reclamation obligation		~~182~~185		~~132~~182
Lease liability, long-term (Note 6)		9298		~~168~~92
Repurchase option (Note 8)		—		1,281
Other long-term liabilities		92		92
Other long-term liabilities		92		—
Total Liabilities		2,501		2,307
Total Liabilities		2,307		1,932

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 11)

SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
Common shares, no par value – unlimited shares authorized; shares outstanding at December 31, 2023 and December 31, 2022 of 212,968,451 and 212,515,951, respectively		136,937		136,906
Common shares, no par value – unlimited shares authorized; shares outstanding at December 31, 2024 and December 31, 2023 of 516,111,557 and 212,968,451, respectively		174,173		136,937
Additional paid in capital		29,140		28,673
Additional paid-in capital		29,102		29,140
Accumulated deficit		(~~157~~176,~~640~~091)		(~~148~~157,~~644~~640)
Total Shareholders’ Equity		827,~~437~~184		168,~~935~~437

Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity	$	1029,~~744~~685	$	1810,~~867~~744

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these audited consolidated financial statements.

5355

Table of Contents

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except per share and common share amounts)


	Year Ended December 31,
	~~2023~~2024		~~2022~~2023
Operating expenses:
Exploration and evaluation (See Note 4 for related party costs)	$	(818,~~242~~479)	$	(48,~~155~~242)
Corporate administration		(2,~~828~~666)		(52,~~106~~828)
Depreciation and amortization		(~~102~~155)		(~~100~~102)
Total operating expenses		(1121,~~172~~300)		(911,~~361~~172)

Non-operating income (expense):
Interest income		~~476~~1,182		~~258~~476
Grant income		2,000		—2,000
Accretion expense		(283)		(284)
Accretion expense - Land Repurchase Option (Note 8)		(236)		(283)
Interest expense		(2932)		(3929)
Gain on sale of equipment		12		—
Loss on land repurchase		(67)		—
Total non-operating income (expense)		2,176		(65)
Gain on sale of equipment		2		12

Total non-operating income		2,849		2,176
Net loss	$	(8,996)	$	(9,426)


Net loss	$	(18,451)	$	(8,996)
LOSS PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED	$	(0.04)	$	(0.04)


LOSS PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED	$	(0.04)	$	(0.04)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING		212,686,616		212,475,088

WEIGHTED AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING		498,142,882		257,066,919

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these audited consolidated financial statements.

5456

Table of Contents

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars)


	For the year ended December 31,
	~~2023~~2024		~~2022~~2023
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(818,~~996~~451)	$	(98,~~426~~996)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation		2		1
Depreciation and accretion expense		249		285
Accretion expense		283		284
Right of use asset amortization		142		100
Right of use asset amortization		100		99
Lease liability		(134)		(96)
Lease liability		(96)		(85)
Stock-based compensation		(38)		467
Stock-based compensation		467		2,920
Reclamation obligation		3		50
Reclamation obligation		50		—
Other		300		(179)
Other		(179)		(25)
		(17,929)		(8,369)
		(8,369)		(6,232)

Changes in working capital:
Due from related party		(5)		(68)
Due to (from) related party		4,329		(5)
Grant receivable		(2,000)		—
Grant collection (receivable)		2,000		(2,000)
Prepaid expenses and other		~~(1,396)~~210		(21,~~207~~396)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		64771		~~(892)~~64
Net cash used in operating activities		(1110,~~706~~619)		(911,~~399~~706)

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from the sale of equipment		12		—12
Purchase of equipment		(1664)		—(16)
Net cash used in investing activities		(4)		—
Land purchase (Note 8)		(1,507)		—
Net cash used in investing activities		(1,559)		(4)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Stock option exercise		31		—
Financing transaction, net (Note 7)		35,286		—
Repurchase option payment		~~(25)~~—		(25)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		6		(25)
Stock option exercise		—		31
Net cash provided by financing activities		35,286		6

Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash		~~(11~~23,~~704)~~108		(911,~~424~~704)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash- beginning of the period		153,~~523~~819		2415,~~947~~523
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash- end of the period	$	326,~~819~~927	$	153,~~523~~819

Supplemental cash flow disclosures:
Cash paid for taxes	$	—	$	—
Cash paid for interest	$	—	$	—
Non-cash common shares issued in land repurchase (Note 8)	$	1,950	$	—

	As of December 31,
	~~2023~~2024		~~2022~~2023
Reconciliation of amounts in the Balance Sheet to amounts in the Cash Flow Statement:
Reconciliation of amounts in the Balance Sheet to amounts in the Cash Flow Statement
Cash and cash equivalents	$	326,~~633~~732	$	153,~~523~~633
Restricted cash, long-term		~~186~~195		—186
Total of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash - end of period	$	326,~~819~~927	$	153,~~523~~819

Supplemental disclosure with respect to cash flows – Note 12

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these audited consolidated financial statements.

5557

Table of Contents

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY ~~(DEFICIT)~~

(Expressed in thousands of U.S. Dollars, except number of shares)


				Additional
				Paid in		Accumulated
	Number of Shares	Amount		Capital		Deficit		Total
Balance, December 31, 2021	212,466,889	$	136,906	$	25,753	$	(139,218)	$	23,441
Stock option exercise	49,062		—		—		—		—
Stock-based compensation	—		—		2,920		—		2,920
Net loss	—		—		—		(9,426)		(9,426)
Balance, December 31, 2022	212,515,951	$	136,906	$	28,673	$	(148,644)	$	16,935

Stock option exercise	455,000		31		—		—		31
Balance, December 31, 2022	212,515,951	$	136,906	$	28,673	$	(148,644)	$	16,935
Stock-based compensation	—		—		467		—		467
Stock option exercises	455,000		31		—		—		31
Stock-based compensation	—		—		467		—		467
Common shares cancelled	(2,500)		—		—		—		—
Net loss	—		—		—		(8,996)		(8,996)
Balance, December 31, 2023	212,968,451	$	136,937	$	29,140	$	(157,640)	$	8,437

Balance, December 31, 2023	212,968,451	$	136,937	$	29,140	$	(157,640)	$	8,437
2024 Rights Offering	298,106,831		35,286		—		—		35,286
Stock option exercises	36,275		—		—		—		—
Stock-based compensation	—		—		(38)		—		(38)
Land repurchase	5,000,000		1,950		—		—		1,950
Net loss	—		—		—		(18,451)		(18,451)
Balance, December 31, 2024	516,111,557	$	174,173	$	29,102	$	(176,091)	$	27,184

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these audited consolidated financial statements.

5658

Table of Contents

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, ~~2023~~2024

(all amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars except share and per share amounts)

1. NATURE OF OPERATIONS

Rare Element Resources Ltd. (“we,” “us,” “Rare Element” or the “Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the Province of British Columbia, Canada, on June 3, 1999.

Rare Element holds a 100% interest in the Bear Lodge rare earth elements project (the “Bear Lodge REE Project”) located near the town of Sundance in northeast Wyoming. The Bear Lodge REE Project consists of several large, disseminated rare earth elements (“REE”) deposits ~~that~~having ~~comprise~~a ~~one~~favorable distribution of ~~the highest-grade REE deposits identified in North America. In addition, to~~ neodymium-praseodymium (“NdPr”), ~~the~~as ~~Bear~~well ~~Lodge~~as ~~REE Project has~~ a ~~favorable distribution of a~~ number of other critical rare earth elements. ~~The~~Additionally, the Company ~~also~~has ~~holds~~developed aand ~~100%~~enhanced, ~~interest~~along inwith ~~the~~General ~~Sundance~~Atomics ~~Gold~~and ~~Project~~its ~~that~~affiliates, isinnovative ~~adjacent~~and toproprietary ~~the Bear Lodge~~ REE ~~Project~~processing and ~~contains~~separation acapabilities ~~historical~~for ~~inferred mineral resource primarily composed of three gold targets within~~ the ~~area~~processing of the Bear Lodge ~~Property. Given the Company’s longstanding focus on the Bear Lodge~~ REE Project ~~and~~feed ~~the~~material ~~current interest in REE, the advancement of the Sundance Gold Project has been on hold since 2011~~ and ~~will~~possibly ~~likely~~feed ~~remain~~materials sofrom ~~for~~other ~~the foreseeable future~~sources.

~~The~~If ~~Company is currently focused on the advancement of a rare earth processing~~ and ~~separation~~when ~~demonstration-scale plant (the “Demonstration Plant”) project. In January 2021~~developed, ~~a consortium of companies, of which~~ the ~~Company~~Bear isLodge aREE ~~part,~~Project ~~received~~will ~~notice~~likely ~~from~~consist ~~the Department~~ of ~~Energy (“DoE”) that the consortium had been selected for negotiation of~~ a ~~potential~~mine ~~financial award for the engineering, construction~~ and ~~operation of~~ a ~~rare earth~~ separation ~~and~~plant ~~processing~~to ~~Demonstration~~produce ~~Plant.~~a ~~The~~commercial ~~consortium~~NdPr ofproduct. ~~companies~~As ismarket ~~led~~conditions ~~by General Atomics~~dictate, ~~an affiliate of Synchron,~~ the Company’s ~~majority~~will ~~shareholder,~~decide ~~and~~whether ~~includes~~it ~~certain~~is ofprudent ~~General~~to ~~Atomics’~~develop ~~affiliates,~~ and ~~LNV,~~put aninto ~~Ardurra~~production ~~Group, Inc. company, as engineering and construction subcontractor. A formal proposal was submitted by~~ the ~~consortium~~mine ~~in response to a published Funding Opportunity Announcement in mid-2020 for the construction~~ and ~~operation of a rare earth~~ separation ~~and processing demonstration~~ plant ~~utilizing~~independent proprietary technology to produce commercial-grade products. The DoE finalized the award, and an agreement was executed by the DoE’s grants/agreement officer on September 27, 2021, with an effective date of ~~October 1,~~each ~~2021. The Company, as a subrecipient of the award, along with the~~ other ~~consortium~~or ~~members,~~whether ~~commenced~~linking ~~work on~~ the ~~planning~~two ~~and~~production ~~design~~processes ofinto ~~the~~a ~~Demonstration~~single ~~Plant~~ project ~~in November 2021, with the Company’s contractual arrangement with General Atomics finalized in December 2021. The DoE funding~~ is in the ~~amount~~more ofprudent ~~$21,900 and represents approximately one-half of the originally estimated costs for the Demonstration Plant~~path. ~~The Demonstration Plant will process already stockpiled high-grade sample materials from the Bear Lodge REE Project.~~

The Company also holds a 100% interest in the Sundance Gold Project that is adjacent to the Bear Lodge REE Project and contains a historical inferred mineral resource primarily composed of three gold targets within the area of the Bear Lodge Property. Given the Company’s longstanding focus on the Bear Lodge REE Project and the current interest in REEs, the advancement of the Sundance Gold Project has been on hold since 2011 and will likely remain so for the foreseeable future.

The Company is currently focused on the advancement of a rare earth processing and separation demonstration-scale plant (the “Demonstration Plant”) project. The Demonstration Plant will process already stockpiled high-grade sample materials from the Bear Lodge REE Project.

In January 2021, a consortium of companies, of which the Company is a part, received notice from the Department of Energy (“DoE”) that the consortium had been selected for negotiation of a potential financial award for the engineering, construction and operation of a rare earth separation and processing demonstration plant, which is now the Demonstration Plant project. The consortium of companies is led by General Atomics, an affiliate of Synchron, the Company’s majority shareholder, and includes certain of General Atomics’ affiliates, the Company and LNV, an Ardurra Group, Inc. company, as engineering and construction subcontractor. The Company, as a subrecipient of the award, along with the other consortium members, commenced work on the planning and design of the Demonstration Plant project in November 2021, with the Company’s contractual arrangement with General Atomics finalized in December 2021. The DoE’s original funding commitment was in the amount of $21,900 and represented approximately one-half of the originally estimated costs for the Demonstration Plant. To help offset subsequent Demonstration Plant project cost increases, when the DoE issued its project continuation notice in September 2024, the DoE increased its funding commitment from $21,900 to approximately $24,200.

To address the Company’s funding needs, inincluding ~~December 2021,~~ the ~~Company~~funding ~~completed~~required ~~a rights offering~~ for ~~gross~~the ~~proceeds~~Demonstration ~~of approximately $25~~Plant,~~400.~~ ~~The~~the Company iscompleted ~~using~~rights ~~the~~offerings ~~net~~in ~~proceeds~~December ~~from~~2021 (the ~~rights~~“2021 ~~offering~~Rights ~~for~~Offering”) ~~the permitting, licensing, engineering,~~ and ~~planned~~March ~~construction,~~2024 ~~and~~(the ~~operation~~“2024 ofRights ~~the~~Offering”) ~~Demonstration~~for ~~Plant~~gross ~~near~~proceeds ~~the~~of ~~Company’s~~approximately ~~Bear~~$25,400 ~~Lodge~~and ~~REE~~$35,800, ~~Project~~respectively. The previously noted $21,900 financial award from the DoE was expected to fund approximately one-half of the originally expected total cost of the Demonstration Plant project, with the balance of the required funding being provided by the Company utilizing the proceeds from the ~~rights~~2021 ~~offering~~Rights Offering, the $4,400 grant from the Wyoming Energy Authority (the “WEA”) as discussed ~~more fully~~ in Note 5, and other funding sources, as necessary. Due to inflationary pressures and design enhancements, ~~the~~among ~~initial~~other factors, the Demonstration Plant project cost estimate ~~of $43,800 has~~ increased ~~and~~above ~~as a result on December 5, 2023,~~ the ~~Company~~initial ~~announced~~estimate ~~its~~of ~~intention to launch a rights offering to raise approximately~~ $3643,~~000 in gross proceeds. In March 2024~~800, ~~the~~resulting ~~Company~~in ~~completed~~ the ~~rights~~need ~~offering~~ for ~~gross~~the ~~proceeds~~2024 ofRights ~~approximately $35~~Offering,~~800~~ in which ~~each~~closed ~~holder~~in ofMarch ~~the Company’s common shares as of the record date of December 15~~2024, ~~2023 was eligible~~ to ~~participate. The Company plans to use the net proceeds from the rights offering to progress the Company’s business strategy to support commercialization and~~ fund, ~~activities~~in ~~to support the advancement of the Bear Lodge REE Project~~part, ~~which includes funding~~ the ~~operation of the~~ Demonstration Plant ~~for~~operations a period of time that is expected to be sufficient to provide the information to support a commercialization decision, acquiring real property, updating the mineral resource model and technical reports, and advancing permitting, environmental support, and basic engineering, as well as ~~for~~ other general corporate purposes. Ultimately, in the event the Company cannot secure additional financial resources, or complete a strategic transaction in the longer term, the Company may need to curtail or suspend its operational plans regarding the Demonstration Plant or other initiatives, or potentially liquidate its business interests, and investors may lose all or part of their investment.

5759

Table of Contents

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, ~~2023~~2024

(all amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars except share and per share amounts)

~~During 2022 and 2023~~Ultimately, ~~the~~in ~~Company continued its work on~~ the ~~Demonstration~~event ~~Plant project. This work is expected to continue through~~ the ~~Demonstration~~Company ~~Plant’s~~cannot ~~expected~~secure ~~completion~~additional ~~date~~financial ~~in 2025. In December 2022~~resources, ~~the~~or ~~Demonstration~~complete ~~Plant~~a ~~achieved~~strategic ~~its~~transaction ~~final engineering design milestone marking the completion of the DoE’s first go/no-go decision point. A second go/no-go gating milestone was achieved~~ in ~~December 2023 with~~ the ~~issuance~~longer byterm, the ~~DoE~~Company ofmay aneed ~~Project~~to ~~Continuation~~curtail ~~Notice,~~or ~~allowing~~suspend ~~for~~ the ~~construction~~development ofand ~~the~~commercialization ~~Demonstration Plant. The completion~~ of ~~these~~its ~~milestones~~Bear ~~were~~Lodge ~~each~~REE ~~gating~~Project ~~events~~or ~~for~~other ~~the~~initiatives, ~~DoE’s~~or ~~continued~~potentially ~~funding~~liquidate asits ~~provided~~business ~~for in the 2021 award grant. With the completion of this second gating event~~interests, ~~the Demonstration Plant’s construction is now underway~~ and isinvestors ~~expected~~may tolose beall ~~completed~~or inpart ~~mid-2024. Operations to process and separate the REE from the sample materials are expected to follow the completion~~ of ~~the~~their ~~Demonstration Plant’s construction for an additional 12-to-15-month period~~investment.

~~The~~During ~~Company~~2023 ~~has~~and ~~incurred losses since its inception~~2024, ~~and~~the ~~further~~Company ~~losses~~continued ~~are~~its ~~anticipated~~work inon the ~~development~~Demonstration ofPlant ~~its business~~project. AsThis ofwork ~~December 31, 2023,~~is ~~the~~planned ~~Company~~to ~~had~~continue ~~cash~~until ~~and~~the ~~cash~~Demonstration ~~equivalents~~Plant’s expected completion of ~~$3,633~~operations. ~~During~~In ~~the year ended~~ December 312022, ~~2023,~~the weDemonstration ~~consumed~~Plant ~~cash~~achieved ofits ~~$11,706,~~final ofengineering ~~which~~design ~~approximately $9~~milestone,~~000~~ ~~was~~marking ~~used for~~ the ~~payment~~DoE’s offirst ~~costs~~go/no-go ~~associated~~decision ~~with~~point. ~~the~~A ~~Demonstration~~second ~~Plant~~go/no-go ~~project,~~gating ~~with~~milestone ~~the~~was ~~remainder~~achieved ~~having~~in ~~been~~December ~~used~~2023 ~~for~~with the ~~payment~~issuance ofby the ~~Company’s~~DoE ~~general~~of ~~and~~a ~~administrative~~Project ~~expenses~~Continuation ~~and~~Notice, ~~other~~allowing ~~ongoing~~for ~~costs~~the construction of ~~sustaining~~the ~~its~~Demonstration ~~properties and mining claims~~Plant.

In September 2024, the DoE issued its final Project Continuation Notice following its approval of the revised project budget of $53,600 and confirmation of readiness for the operations phase of the Demonstration Plant. This notice, along with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s (the “NRC”) operations approval under its previously issued license (received in October 2024), allows for the commencement of Demonstration Plant operations. Operations to process and separate the sample materials and recover the NdPr and other REEs are currently expected to extend into the fourth quarter of 2025.

The Company has incurred losses since its inception, and further losses are anticipated in the development of its business. As of December 31, 2024, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $26,732. During the year ended December 31, 2024, we consumed cash of $10,619 in our operating activities, the majority of which was for the payment of costs associated with the Demonstration Plant project, while the remainder was used for the payment of the Company’s general and administrative expenses and other ongoing costs of sustaining its properties. Additional Demonstration Plant cost increases are expected above the $53,600 revised project budget, now estimated to be approximately $66,000, and will likely have to be funded by the Company if the Company is unable to secure additional project funding from other sources, which are currently being pursued. The Company believes that it currently has adequate funds to meet its obligations for the next 12 months from the date of this filing.

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

Principles of Consolidation

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and are inclusive of the accounts of Rare Element Resources Ltd. and its directly held wholly owned subsidiary, Rare Element Resources, Inc. All numbers in the consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars (in thousands), unless otherwise denoted.

Reclassifications

Certain amounts for the year ended December 31, ~~2022~~2023 have been reclassified to conform to the ~~2023~~2024 presentation. Total assets, liabilities, equity, and net loss did not change for the prior periods due to the reclassifications.

3. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The amounts that involve ~~significant~~ estimates include our lease obligations, reclamation obligations and stock-based compensation.

~~Cash and Cash Equivalents~~60

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less. At December 31, 2023 and 2022, cash and cash equivalents consisted of $3,633 and $15,523, respectively, of funds held in bank and investment accounts with financial institutions in the United States.

The Company continually monitors its cash positions with, and the credit quality of, the financial institutions with which it invests. The Company maintains balances in various U.S. financial institutions in excess of U.S. federally insured limits.

Table of Contents

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, ~~2023~~2024

(all amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars except share and per share amounts)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of cash and liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, cash and cash equivalents consisted of $26,732 and $3,633, respectively, of funds held in bank and investment accounts with financial institutions in the United States.

Restricted Cash

The Company periodically maintains cash deposits that are held and earmarked for a specific purpose. At December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company had $195 and $186, respectively, in restricted cash for amounts held by a third party as security for a surety bond for our Demonstration Plant.

Mineral Properties and Exploration and Evaluation Costs

Mineral property acquisition costs, including indirectly related acquisition costs, are capitalized when incurred. Acquisition costs include cash ~~consideration~~considerations, and the fair market value of the Company’s common shares (the “Common Shares”) issued as consideration. Properties acquired under option agreements, whereby payments are made at the sole discretion of the Company, are capitalized as mineral property acquisition costs at such time as the payments are made. Exploration costs are expensed as incurred. When it is determined that a mining deposit can be economically and legally extracted or produced based on established proven and probable mineral reserves, ~~under~~as defined by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) Item 1300 of Regulation S-K or National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects of the Canadian Securities Administrators (“NI 43-101”), development costs related to such reserves and incurred after such determination will be considered for capitalization. The establishment of proven and probable reserves is based on results of feasibility studies. Upon commencement of commercial production, capitalized costs will be amortized over their estimated useful lives or units of production, whichever is a more reliable measure. Capitalized amounts relating to a property that is abandoned or otherwise considered uneconomic for the foreseeable future will be written off.

The Company currently has no proven and probable reserves, and you are specifically cautioned not to assume that any part or all of our mineral resources will ever be converted into mineral reserves, as defined by the SEC or NI 43-101. See “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Annual Report.

Research & Development (“R&D”) Expenditures

Materials, equipment, and facilities acquired or constructed for R&D activities associated with the Company’s Demonstration Plant project are expensed as incurred. These materials, equipment and facilities are not expected to have an alternative future use beyond the end of the current Demonstration Plant project.

Reclamation Obligations

The Company’s mining and exploration activities are subject to various laws and regulations, including legal and contractual obligations to reclaim, remediate, or otherwise restore properties at the time the property is removed from service. Reclamation obligations are recognized when incurred and recorded as liabilities at fair value. The reclamation obligation is based on when spending for an existing disturbance will occur. The Company reclaims the disturbance from its exploration programs on an ongoing basis; therefore, the portion of its reclamation obligation corresponding to its exploration programs expected to be settled in the near term is classified as a current liability. The remaining reclamation associated with environmental monitoring programs is classified as a long-term liability; however, because we have not declared proven or probable mineral reserves as defined under Item 1300 of Regulation S-K, the timing of these reclamation activities is uncertain as the reclamation areas will only be utilized once the Bear Lodge REE Project is operating. For exploration stage properties that do not qualify for asset capitalization, the costs associated with the reclamation obligation are charged to operations. For development and production stage properties, the costs are added to the capitalized costs of the property and amortized using the units-of-production method. We review, on a quarterly basis, unless otherwise deemed necessary, the reclamation obligation associated with our Bear Lodge Property.

The Company’s reclamation obligation is secured by surety bonds held for the benefit of the state of Wyoming in amounts determined by the applicable federal or state regulatory agencies. The Company’s reclamation obligation, which increased from $132 as of December 31, 2022 to $182 as of December 31, 2023, was due to a revision in this estimate.61

Depreciation

Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method. The Company depreciates computer equipment, furniture and fixtures and geological equipment over a period of three to ten years. The Company depreciates vehicles over a period of five years.

Table of Contents

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, ~~2023~~2024

(all amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars except share and per share amounts)

reclamation activities is uncertain as the reclamation areas will only be utilized once the Bear Lodge REE Project is operating. For exploration stage properties that do not qualify for asset capitalization, the costs associated with the reclamation obligation are charged to operations. For development and production stage properties, the costs are added to the capitalized costs of the property and amortized using the units-of-production method. We review, on a quarterly basis, unless otherwise deemed necessary, the reclamation obligation associated with our Bear Lodge Property.

The Company’s reclamation obligation is secured by surety bonds held for the benefit of the state of Wyoming in amounts determined by the applicable federal or state regulatory agencies. The Company’s reclamation obligation, which increased from $182 as of December 31, 2023 to $185 as of December 31, 2024, was due to a revision in this estimate.

Depreciation

Stock-based Compensation

The fair value of stock-based compensation awards is measured at the date of grant and amortized over the requisite service period, which is generally the vesting period, with a corresponding increase in additional paid-in capital. The Company uses the Black-Scholes option valuation model to calculate the fair value of awards granted.

In the case of a share-based compensation award that is either cancelled or forfeited prior to vesting, the amortized expense associated with the unvested awards is reversed. The Company has elected to account for forfeitures as they occur.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax basis. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Under the asset and liability method, the effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recognized if it is more likely than not that the entire or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be recognized.

Loss per Share

Loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. To calculate diluted loss per share, the Company uses the treasury stock method and the if-converted method. In March 2024, the Company completed the 2024 Rights Offering (Note 7), whereby the Company offered existing shareholders the right to purchase additional common shares at $0.12 per share (the “Offer Price”). Because the Offer Price was significantly lower than the market trading price of the common shares at that time, the discounted Offer Price was considered a bonus element similar in nature to a stock dividend. As a result, the earnings per share calculations have been retroactively adjusted for the bonus element for all periods presented. Diluted loss per share is not presented, as the effect on the basic loss per share would be anti-dilutive. At December 31, ~~2023~~2024 and ~~2022~~2023, we had 4,~~725~~405,000 and 4,~~160~~725,000 of potentially dilutive securities, respectively, related to outstanding stock options.

Table of Contents

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2024

(all amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars except share and per share amounts)

Fair Value

GAAP defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or be paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price) and establishes a fair-value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value using the following definitions (from highest to lowest priority):

●

Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

●

Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

●

Level 3 — Prices or valuation techniques requiring inputs that are both significant to the fair-value measurement and unobservable.

Financial assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurements on a recurring basis and the level of inputs used in such measurements by major security type as of December 31, 2024 and 2023 are presented in the following table:


Fair value at December 31, 2024
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Money market funds	$	26,449	$	26,449	$	—	$	—

Fair value at December 31, 2023
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Money market funds	$	3,301	$	3,301	$	—	$	—
Grant and related party receivables		2,179		2,179		—		—

Money market funds are valued at cost, which approximates fair value. These amounts are included on the balance sheet in cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2024 and 2023.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

4. RELATED PARTY

Cost Share Agreement with General Atomics

Table of Contents

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, ~~2023~~2024

(all amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars except share and per share amounts)

~~Financial~~Group, ~~assets~~Inc. company, as engineering and ~~liabilities~~construction ~~subject~~subcontractor. toA ~~fair~~formal ~~value~~proposal ~~measurements~~was onsubmitted by the consortium in response to a ~~recurring~~published ~~basis~~Funding Opportunity Announcement in mid-2020 for the construction and operation of the ~~level~~Demonstration Plant utilizing proprietary technology to produce commercial-grade products. Under this original proposal, the DoE’s share of ~~inputs~~the ~~used~~Demonstration inPlant ~~such~~project ~~measurements~~funding was estimated at $21,900 and represented approximately one-half of the total originally estimated costs for the project. The DoE agreement was executed by ~~major~~the ~~security~~DoE’s ~~type~~grants/agreement asofficer on September 27, 2021, with an effective date of ~~December~~October 311, 2021. The DoE award was finalized through a cooperative agreement dated October ~~2023~~1, ~~and~~2021 ~~2022~~(the ~~are~~“Cooperative ~~presented~~Agreement”) that was awarded by the DoE for the Demonstration Plant. The Cooperative Agreement provided that up to approximately $43,800 in allowable costs for the ~~following~~Demonstration ~~table:~~Plant were to be funded on a cost-share basis, 50% by the DoE and 50% by a non-federal entity.

On November 30, 2021, the Company and General Atomics entered into a Cost Share Funding Assumption Agreement (the “Cost Share Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to assume and pay for the 50% of the non-federal funds incurred by, and on behalf of, General Atomics for the design, construction, and operation of the Demonstration Plant under the Cooperative Agreement. The Demonstration Plant will process already stockpiled high-grade sample materials from the Bear Lodge REE Project. Since inception, the Company has advanced funds netting to $20,389 to General Atomics under the Cost Share Agreement and paid another $4,746 on General Atomics’ behalf to certain other contractors for work performed under the Cost Share Agreement.


Fair value at December 31, 2023
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Money market funds	$	3,301	$	3,301	$	—	$	—
Grants and related party receivables		2,179		2,179		—		—

Fair value at December 31, 2022
	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets:
Money market funds	$	5,216	$	5,216	$	—	$	—
U.S. Treasury bills		9,961		9,961		—		—
Related party receivable		174		174		—		—

On March 17, 2022, the Company executed a subcontract purchase order in the amount of $5,318 with General Atomics under which the Company agreed to provide certain services and materials to the Demonstration Plant project, including, but not limited to, providing the plant’s sample materials, engaging in site location leases and other logistics, providing operational support, and providing decommissioning, bonding and other Demonstration Plant support activities (the “Subcontract Purchase Order”). In connection with the Subcontract Purchase Order, the Company submitted monthly invoices to General Atomics for the subcontracted services performed, which were reimbursed by General Atomics with one-half of the funds coming from funds advanced by the Company under the Cost Share Agreement and, up to the original Demonstration Plant budget, one-half of the funds from the DOE.

~~Money~~Due ~~market~~to ~~funds~~inflationary cost pressures on labor, equipment, and Uconsumables, as well as cost increases associated with certain optimized plant engineering and design parameters, General Atomics, on behalf of the consortium, submitted to the DoE an updated Demonstration Plant project budget of approximately $53,600, which is approximately 22% higher than the original budget of approximately $43,800.S. ~~Treasury~~In ~~bills~~response, ~~are~~the ~~valued~~DoE atpledged an additional cost-share funding commitment of $2,400 to ~~which~~fund ~~approximates~~a ~~fair~~portion ~~value~~of the budget increase, with the balance coming from the Company, including funds raised by the Company in the 2024 Rights Offering. These ~~amounts~~additional funds are ~~included~~expected onto support the ~~balance~~operations ~~sheet~~of inthe ~~cash~~Demonstration ~~and~~Plant ~~cash~~for ~~equivalents~~a atsufficient ~~December~~amount ~~31,~~of ~~2023~~time ~~and~~to ~~2022.~~gather the information necessary for a commercialization decision.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

NoOn ~~recent~~May ~~accounting~~16, ~~pronouncements~~2024, ~~are~~the ~~applicable~~Company and General Atomics entered into an extension agreement to the Cost Share Agreement (the “Extension Agreement”) under which the Company atagreed ~~this~~to ~~time~~make additional cash advances, up to $2,500, to General Atomics while the parties progressed an amended project funding agreement covering the Company’s share of the additional non-federal project funding needed for the project’s completion. Pursuant to the terms of the Cost Share Agreement and Extension Agreement, the Company had advanced payments to General Atomics, as leader of the consortium, totaling $24,200 through October 31, 2024, the maximum amount of advances authorized under these agreements. In November 2024, General Atomics subsequently returned approximately $3,811 of the amounts previously funded by the Company under the Cost Share Agreement, which were in turn used by the Company, in part, to make payments to certain other contractors for work under the Cost Share Agreement. The payments to these other contractors, all made in November 2024 and on General Atomics’ behalf, totaled to $4,746. The Company and General Atomics expect to enter into an amended Cost Share Agreement in mid-2025 to cover the non-federal portion of the DoE approved project budget of $53,600.

~~4. RELATED PARTY~~

The following table summarizes transactions under the Cost Share Agreement ~~with~~for ~~General~~the ~~Atomics~~years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:

In January 2021, a consortium of companies, of which the Company is a part, received notice from the DoE that the consortium had been selected for negotiation of a potential financial award for the engineering, construction, and operation of the Demonstration Plant. The consortium of companies is led by General Atomics, an affiliate of Synchron (the Company’s majority shareholder), and includes certain of General Atomics’ affiliates, and LNV, an Ardurra Group, Inc. company, as engineering and construction subcontractor. A formal proposal was submitted by the consortium in response to a published Funding Opportunity Announcement in mid-2020 for the construction and operation of the Demonstration Plant utilizing proprietary technology to produce commercial-grade products. The DoE’s share of the Demonstration Plant project funding is $21,900 and represents approximately one-half of the total originally estimated costs for the project. The Demonstration Plant is planned to process already stockpiled high-grade sample materials from the Bear Lodge REE Project. The DoE agreement was executed by the DoE’s grants/agreement officer on September 27, 2021, with an effective date of October 1, 2021. The DoE award was finalized through a cooperative agreement dated October 1, 2021 (the “Cooperative Agreement”) that was awarded by the DoE for the Demonstration Plant. The Cooperative Agreement provides that up to approximately $43,800 in allowable costs for the Demonstration Plant would be funded on a cost-share basis, 50% by the DoE and 50% by a non-federal entity.

Table of Contents

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, ~~2023~~2024

(all amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars except share and per share amounts)

Pursuant to the terms of the Cost Share Agreement, the Company has made payments to General Atomics, as leader of the consortium, totaling $15,700 through December 31, 2023, for Company-assumed costs for the Demonstration Plant, with the number and amount of additional payments to be subject to the mutual written agreement of the parties.


		2024		2023
Balance of funds remaining on deposit with General Atomics as a prepaid expense at beginning of year	$	3,435	$	2,142
Funds transferred to General Atomics during the year		8,500		9,000
Funds returned by General Atomics during the year		(3,811)		—
The Company's share of Demonstration Plant project costs incurred during the year		(9,019)		(7,707)
Balance of funds (owing to)/on deposit with General Atomics as a related party balance at end of year	$	(895)	$	3,435

The term of the Cost Share Agreement will continue until the date of completion of the Demonstration Plant project, unless terminated earlier by either party. Either party may terminate the Cost Share Agreement immediately upon written notice to the other party if any of the following events occurs: (a) the Cooperative Agreement is terminated for any reason prior to the completion of the Demonstration Plant project; (b) the other party commits a material breach of its obligations under the Cost Share Agreement and fails to cure such breach within 30 days; or (c) the other party makes an assignment for the benefit of its creditors, files a petition in bankruptcy, is adjudicated insolvent or bankrupt, or commences any insolvency or bankruptcy proceedings. Upon any early termination of the Cost Share Agreement, the Company must pay for all costs incurred by or on behalf of General Atomics to wind down the Demonstration Plant project other than any allowable costs for such wind-down paid for by the DoE.

The following table summarizes transactions under the Cost Share Agreement for the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022:


		2023		2022
Balance of funds remaining on deposit with General Atomics as a prepaid expense at beginning of year	$	2,142	$	—
Funds transferred to General Atomics during the year		9,000		6,700
Company's share of Demonstration Plant project costs incurred during the year		(7,707)		(4,558)
Balance of funds remaining on deposit with General Atomics as a prepaid expense at end of year	$	3,435	$	2,142

The following table summarizes the related party receivable activity with General Atomics for reimbursable costs incurred by the Company under the Cost Share Agreement for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:


		2024		2023
Balance of receivables due from General Atomics at beginning of year	$	179	$	174
Reimbursable costs incurred by the Company during the year		684		1,319
Reimbursements received from General Atomics during the year		(863)		(1,314)
Balance of receivables due from General Atomics at end of year	$	—	$	179


		2023		2022
Balance of receivables due from General Atomics at beginning of year	$	174	$	106
Reimbursable costs incurred by the Company during the year		1,319		900
Reimbursements received from General Atomics during the year		(1,314)		(832)
Balance of receivables due from General Atomics at end of year	$	179	$	174

Subsequent to year-end, the Company received payments totaling $179 from General Atomics for all amounts owing under the Cost Share Agreement at December 31, 2023.

5. WYOMING ENERGY AUTHORITY GRANT

In June 2023, the Company, and the WEA entered into a Funding Agreement (the “WEA Funding Agreement”) pursuant to which the WEA agreed to fund, subject to certain conditions, a $4,400 grant to the Company, the proceeds of which are to be used for the Demonstration Plant. Pursuant to the WEA Funding Agreement, the grant is to be paid upon the WEA’s receipt of invoices from the Company detailing its actual expenses relating to the Demonstration Plant (half of which funds will be allocated to two milestone periods during the development process), less a 10% ~~(or $440)~~ retainer, the payment of which is conditioned upon the WEA’s receipt, following the commencement of the Demonstration Plant’s operations, of an invoice and the Company’s final executive summary report in a form to be approved by the WEA. Pursuant to the WEA Funding Agreement, the funding for the Demonstration Plant will be provided to the WEA from the Energy Resources Council (the “ERC”) and is further conditioned upon the availability of government funds that are appropriated or allocated for the payment of the grant and which may be limited for any reason, including congressional, legislative, gubernatorial, or administration action.

62The WEA Funding Agreement will terminate when the funding has been fully disbursed, but no later than December 31, 2025, unless terminated sooner by either party in accordance with the terms of the WEA Funding Agreement. The WEA Funding Agreement may be terminated (i) by either party if the WEA does not receive the requested funding from the ERC or if the grant funds are not allocated or available for the continued performance of the WEA Funding Agreement, or (ii) by the WEA immediately for cause if the Company fails to perform in accordance with the terms of the WEA Funding Agreement

The following table summarizes transactions under the WEA Funding Agreement for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:


		2024		2023
Grant receivable due from the WEA at beginning of period	$	2,000	$	—
Grant amounts invoiced to the WEA during the period		2,000		2,000
Grant reimbursements received from the WEA during the period		(4,000)		—
Grant receivable due from the WEA at end of period	$	—	$	2,000

Table of Contents

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, ~~2023~~2024

(all amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars except share and per share amounts)

The ~~WEA~~Company ~~Funding~~received ~~Agreement~~payment ~~will~~in ~~terminate~~January ~~when~~2024 of the ~~funding has been fully disbursed~~$2,000 ~~but~~grant noreceivable ~~later~~balance ~~than~~at December 31, ~~2025, unless terminated sooner by either party in accordance with the terms of the WEA Funding Agreement~~2023. ~~The~~In ~~WEA~~September ~~Funding~~2024, ~~Agreement may be terminated (i) by either party if~~ the ~~WEA~~Company ~~does~~submitted ~~not~~a ~~receive~~second ~~the requested~~ funding ~~from~~request ~~the~~to ~~ERC or if~~ the ~~grant~~WEA ~~funds~~for ~~are~~an ~~not~~additional ~~allocated~~$2,000, with ~~or available for~~ the ~~continued~~achievement ~~performance~~ of the ~~WEA~~second ~~Funding~~milestone. The ~~Agreement,~~Company orcollected ~~(ii)~~this bysecond ~~the~~$2,000 ~~WEA~~tranche ~~immediately~~in ~~for~~November ~~cause~~2024. The ifbilling of the ~~Company~~remaining ~~fails~~$400 retainer tois ~~perform~~expected in ~~accordance with the terms of the WEA Funding Agreement~~mid-2025.

~~The~~Because ~~following~~there ~~table~~is ~~summarizes~~no ~~transactions~~specific guidance under U.S. GAAP that addresses the recognition and measurement of government assistance received by non-government entities, the Company has elected to account for the WEA grant by analogy to the guidance provided under U.S. GAAP for government assistance to non-business entities. Under this guidance, any recognition of the grant is deferred and only gets recorded in the grantee’s financial statements if and when the applicable gating condition(s) have been substantially met. Accordingly, the Company has not yet recognized as grant income the final $400 remaining under the WEA Funding Agreement ~~for~~as this amount is conditioned upon the ~~years~~commencement ~~ended~~of the Demonstration Plant’s operations and receipt of the Company’s final executive summary report, neither of which had been met at December 31, ~~2023~~2024. ~~and 2022:~~


		2023		2022
Grant receivable due from WEA at beginning of year	$	—	$	—
Grant amounts invoiced to WEA during the year		2,000		—
Grant reimbursements received from WEA during the year		—		—
Grant receivable due from WEA at end of year	$	2,000	$	—

The Company received payment in January 2024 of the $2,000 grant receivable balance at December 31, 2023. The remaining $2,400 of the $4,400 grant total, which is conditioned on the achievement of other, future milestones, will be invoiced to the WEA once those milestones have been achieved (expected in 2024).

Because there is no specific guidance under U.S. GAAP that addresses the recognition and measurement of government assistance received by non-government entities, the Company has elected to account for the WEA grant by analogy to the guidance provided under U.S. GAAP for government assistance to non-business entities. Under this guidance, any recognition of the grant is deferred and only gets recorded in the grantee’s financial statements if and when the applicable gating condition(s) have been substantially met. Accordingly, the Company has only recognized in its December 31, 2023 financial statements the $2,000 associated with the achievement of the first milestone.

6. LEASES

The Company accounts for leases in accordance with ASC 842 – Leases. This accounting standard requires all lessees to record the impact of leasing contracts on the balance sheet as a right to use asset and corresponding liability. This is measured by taking the present value of the remaining lease payments over the lease term and recording a right to use asset and corresponding lease obligation for lease payments. Rent expense is realized on a straight-line basis and the lease obligation is amortized based on the effective interest method. The amounts recognized reflect the present value of the remaining lease payments for all leases that have a lease term greater than 12 months. The discount rate used is an estimate of the Company’s incremental borrowing rate based on information available at lease commencement in determining the present value of lease payments.

In considering the lease asset value, the Company considers fixed or variable payment terms, prepayments, and options to extend, terminate or purchase. Renewal, termination, or purchase options affect the lease term used for determining lease asset value only if the option is reasonably certain to be exercised.

Effective September 21, 2021, the Company entered into a lease agreement (the “Property Lease”) for real property, including land and buildings in Upton, Wyoming for the Demonstration Plant. The lease is a 12-month lease with annual renewal terms. ~~During~~In June ~~2023~~2024, the ~~lease~~Property Lease was renewed, extending the termination date to September 30, ~~2024~~2025. The ~~agreement~~Property Lease, which is classified as an operating lease, generally provides for base rent, and requires the Company to pay all insurance, personal property taxes on any structure or improvements made by the Company and other maintenance costs. The ~~lease~~Property ~~agreement~~Lease provides for an annual cost of living adjustment, but contains no residual value guarantees or restrictive covenants. ~~For~~Pursuant ~~purposes~~to of the ~~following~~Property ~~table~~Lease, ~~payments under~~ the ~~lease~~Company ~~are~~is ~~assumed~~obligated to ~~run~~remove ~~through~~certain ~~September~~Company ~~30,~~completed ~~2025~~property improvements, ~~the~~though ~~end~~those ofitems ~~the~~requiring ~~lease~~removal, ~~renewal~~if ~~period~~any, ~~most~~will ~~closely~~be ~~following~~confirmed with the ~~completion~~lessor ofprior ~~Demonstration~~to ~~Plant operations. If~~ the ~~completion~~termination of the ~~Demonstration~~Property ~~Plant operations extends past September 2025, the Company may seek to extend the lease term accordingly~~Lease.

63On May 14, 2024, the Company entered into a second lease agreement for modular office units for use at its Demonstration Plant site in Upton, Wyoming (the “Office Lease”). The Office Lease is for an initial 12-month term and provides for monthly extension options thereafter. During the initial 12-month term, the Company, at its option, can terminate the Office Lease for convenience upon ninety (90) days’ prior written notice and the payment of an early termination fee. The Office Lease, which is classified as an operating lease, generally provides for base rent, and requires the Company to pay all insurance, property taxes and other applicable costs, including the transportation charges to return the units to their original point of origin in an amount not to exceed $7.

For purposes of the following table, payments under the Property Lease and Office Lease are assumed to run through September 30, 2026 and December 31, 2025, respectively. If the completion of the Demonstration Plant operations dictates further extensions beyond these dates, the Company may seek to extend the term of one or both lease agreements accordingly.

Table of Contents

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, ~~2023~~2024

(all amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars except share and per share amounts)

Total future minimum lease payments under the Company’s leases as of December 31, ~~2023~~2024 were as follows:


2024	$	128
2025	$	198
2025		96
2026		96
Total lease payments		~~224~~294
Less interest		(2124)
Present value of lease payments	$	~~203~~270

For the years ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024 and ~~2022~~2023, $96134 and $8596, respectively, were included in operating cash flows for amounts paid for operating leases.

As of December 31, 2023 and 2022, the weighted average lease terms for the Company’s one operating lease were 1.75 years and 2.75 years (including renewal options), respectively, and the weighted average discount rate was estimated at 12% for both years.

For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company incurred interest expense on lease liabilities of $32 and $29, respectively, and right of use asset amortization expense of $142 and $100, respectively.

As of December 31, 2024 and 2023, the weighted average lease terms for the Company’s operating leases were 1.58 years and 1.75 years (including renewal options), respectively, and the weighted average discount rate was estimated at 12% for both years.

7. MINERAL PROPERTIES

Bear Lodge Property, Wyoming, USA

The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Rare Element Resources, Inc., holds a 100% interest in 499 unpatented mining claims located on land administered by the USFS and ~~a repurchase option (see Note 6) on~~ approximately 640 acres (257 hectares) of fee property, together which contain (1) the Bear Lodge REE Project that contains REE mineralization; and (2) the Sundance Gold Project that contains gold mineralization. The property is situated in the Bear Lodge Mountains of Crook County, in northeast Wyoming.

8. EQUIPMENT AND LAND

Equipment

At December 31, ~~2023~~2024 and ~~2022~~2023, equipment consisted of the following:

December 31, ~~2023~~2024

December 31, ~~2022~~2023

Accumulated

Net book

Accumulated

Net book

Cost

depreciation

value

Cost

depreciation

value

Equipment

~~256~~160

~~227~~95

2965

~~240~~256

~~225~~227

1529

Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024 and ~~2022~~2023 was $213 and $12, respectively. The Company evaluates the recoverability of the carrying value of equipment when events and circumstances indicate that such assets might be impaired. No impairment charges were recorded during the years ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024 and ~~2022~~2023.

Land

6467

Table of Contents

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, ~~2023~~2024

(all amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars except share and per share amounts)

of non-core real property located in Crook County, Wyoming, that was under consideration for a stockpile facility for the Bear Lodge REE Project. Pursuant to and subject to the terms of the Amendment, among other things, the term of the Repurchase Option (which was to expire on October 26, 2021) was extended for up to three additional years, subject to annual option extension payments from the Company to Whitelaw Creek of $25 in cash per year (each, a “Repurchase Option Extension Payment”); and the exercise price of the Repurchase Option was increased from $1,000 to a price to be determined by a mutually agreed upon real estate appraiser (the “Repurchase Price”), provided that (i) the Repurchase Price ~~must~~ not be less than $1,200 or greater than $1,850 and (ii) any Repurchase Option Extension Payments paid by the Company to Whitelaw Creek ~~must~~ be credited toward the Company’s payment of the Repurchase Price if the Repurchase Option iswere later exercised. In October 2023, the Company made the $25 Repurchase Option Extension Payment to Whitelaw Creek to extend the term of the Repurchase Option through October 26, 2024.

~~For~~Pursuant ~~accounting~~to ~~purposes~~the terms of the APA, the Company ~~has~~exercised ~~treated~~its ~~this~~option ~~transaction~~to asrepurchase athe ~~financing~~Whitelaw ~~arrangement~~Creek ~~where~~property, ~~the~~and ~~value~~on ofOctober ~~the~~21, ~~land~~2024, ~~has~~entered ~~been~~into ~~reflected~~a inpurchase ~~the~~agreement ~~Company’s~~with ~~financial~~Whitelaw ~~statements~~Creek asto anrepurchase ~~asset~~the property (~~“Investment~~the in “Land Repurchase”). ~~with~~The aLand ~~related~~Repurchase ~~liability~~closed on October 25, 2024 (the “~~Repurchase~~Closing ~~Option~~Date”). ~~recorded~~As consideration for the ~~Company’s~~Land ~~obligation~~Repurchase, ~~under~~on the ~~Repurchase~~Closing ~~Option.~~Date, ~~Accretion~~the ~~expense~~Company is(i) ~~recorded~~issued 5,000,000 of ~~each~~its ~~reporting~~common ~~period~~shares to ~~increase~~Whitelaw ~~the~~Creek ~~repurchase~~having ~~option~~a ~~liability~~Closing toDate ~~the~~fair ~~maximum~~value ~~exercise price~~ of $1,~~850,~~950 ~~less~~and ~~any~~(ii) paid ~~annual~~Whitelaw ~~option~~Creek ~~payments~~$1,507 in cash. After settlement of ~~$25~~the ~~per~~repurchase ~~year.~~option ~~For~~liability ~~the~~and ~~years~~other ~~ended~~costs ~~December~~incurred ~~31,~~to ~~2023~~close ~~and~~the ~~2022~~transaction, the Company recorded ~~accretion~~a ~~expense~~loss ofon ~~$283~~the ~~and~~land repurchase of $~~284,~~67 ~~respectively,~~for ~~related~~the toyear ~~this~~ended ~~Repurchase~~December ~~Option~~31, 2024.

AtFor ~~December~~accounting 31purposes, ~~2023,~~the Company had treated the ~~balance~~APA ofas a financing arrangement under which the ~~Repurchase~~then-$600 ~~Option~~market ~~has~~value of the land had been ~~classified~~reflected in the Company’s financial statements as an asset (“Investment in Land”) with a ~~current~~related liability ~~given~~(“Repurchase Option”) recorded for the ~~final~~Company’s obligation under the Repurchase Option. ~~extension~~Accretion ~~provided~~expense ~~for~~was inbeing recorded monthly to increase the ~~Amendment~~repurchase ~~ending~~option onliability ~~October~~to 26the maximum exercise price of $1,850, ~~2024~~less any annual option payments of $25 made during the option period.

For the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the Company recorded accretion expense of $236 and $283, respectively, related to the Repurchase Option. With the Company’s repurchase of this property on October 25, 2024, the balances in both the Investment in Land account and the Repurchase Option account were written off and the land was recorded at its fair market value of $2,240.

9. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Stock-based Compensation

As of December 31, ~~2023~~2024 and ~~2022~~2023, the Company had issued and outstanding stock options of 3,~~455~~385,000 and 3,~~910~~455,000, respectively, that were issued under its 10% Rolling Stock Option Plan, as amended, and restated (the “2011 Plan”), and 1,~~270~~020,000 and ~~250~~1,270,000, respectively, that were issued under its 2022 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2022 Plan”).

The 2011 Plan was replaced in 2022 by the 2022 Plan, and as such, no additional stock options can be granted under the 2011 Plan. Under the 2011 Plan, our Board of Directors (the “Board”) could from time-to-time grant stock options to eligible directors, officers, employees, and consultants. The maximum term of any stock option grant under the 2011 Plan was 10 years.

Under the 2022 Plan, as approved by our shareholders at the annual meeting of shareholders on August 23, 2022, ~~our~~the Board ~~of Directors~~ is authorized to grant stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock units, performance stock units and other cash and share-based awards to eligible directors, officers, employees, or consultants up to a maximum of 17,236,689 common shares. The maximum term of any grant under the 2022 Plan is 10 years.

The Company estimates the fair value of its stock option grants using the Black-Scholes option valuation model and the closing price of our common shares on the ~~grant~~business ~~date.~~day ~~The~~prior ~~significant assumptions used~~ to ~~estimate~~ the ~~fair~~grant ~~value~~date. ofThe ~~the~~Company ~~1,020,000~~did ~~and~~not ~~2,080,000~~grant any stock ~~option awards granted during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, were as follows:~~


	Year Ended December 31,
	2023		2022
Risk-free interest rate	1.54	%	1.71-4.18	%
Expected volatility	123	%	135-144	%
Expected dividend yield	Nil		Nil
Expected term in years	8		8

Table of Contents

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, ~~2023~~2024

(all amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars except share and per share amounts)

options during the year ended December 31, 2024. The ~~following~~significant ~~table~~assumptions ~~summarizes~~used ~~our~~to estimate the fair value of the 1,020,000 stock option ~~activity~~awards ~~for~~granted during the ~~years~~year ended December 31, 2023 ~~and~~were ~~2022~~as follows:


	Year Ended December 31,
Risk-free interest rate	1.54	%
	2023				2022
Expected volatility	123	%
			Weighted			Weighted
Expected dividend yield	Nil
			Average			Average
Expected term in years	8
	Number of Stock		Exercise		Number of Stock	Exercise
	Options		Price		Options	Price
Outstanding, beginning of period	4,160,000		$	1.26	2,180,000	$	1.18
Granted	1,020,000		$	0.38	2,080,000	$	1.29
Exercised (1)	(455,000)		$	0.07	(100,000)	$	0.25
Outstanding, end of period	4,725,000		$	1.18	4,160,000	$	1.26

Exercisable, end of period	3,965,000		$	1.31	2,932,500	$	1.28
Non-vested, end of period	760,000		$	0.49	1,227,500	$	1.20

The following table summarizes our stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023:

(1) The 455,000 and 100,000 of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, respectively, resulted in 455,000 and 49,062 common shares being issued on a net settlement basis pursuant to the terms of the 2011 Plan.


	Year Ended December 31,
	2024			2023
		Weighted			Weighted
		Average			Average
	Number of Stock	Exercise		Number of Stock	Exercise
	Options	Price		Options	Price
Outstanding, beginning of period	4,725,000	$	1.18	4,160,000	$	1.26
Granted	—	$	—	1,020,000	$	0.38
Exercised ⁽¹⁾	(50,000)	$	0.07	(455,000)	$	0.07
Cancelled/Expired	(270,000)	$	0.42	—	$	—
Outstanding, end of period	4,405,000	$	1.24	4,725,000	$	1.18

Exercisable, end of period	4,363,333	$	1.24	3,965,000	$	1.31
Non-vested, end of period	41,667	$	1.20	760,000	$	0.49

Stock-based compensation expense is included in corporate administration expenses within the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. For the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022, the Company recognized compensation expense related to stock option awards of $467 and $2,920, respectively. As of December 31, 2023, there was approximately $62 of total unrecognized compensation cost to be recognized over a weighted-average remaining period of approximately 1.3 years.


			Weighted
			Average
			Remaining
As of December 31, 2023:		Intrinsic Value	Life (Years)
Stock options outstanding	$	13	7.0
Stock options exercisable	$	13	6.7
Stock options non-vested	$	—	8.9

(1) The ~~intrinsic~~50,000 ~~value~~and 455,000 of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024 and ~~2022~~2023, ~~was~~respectively, ~~$202~~resulted in 36,275 and ~~$24~~455,000 ~~respectively.~~common shares being issued on a net settlement basis pursuant to the terms of the 2011 Plan.

The following table summarizes the intrinsic value and weighted average remaining life for stock options as of December 31, 2024:

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the years ended December 31, 2023 and 2022 was $0.35 and $1.29, respectively.


			Weighted
			Average
			Remaining
As of December 31, 2024:		Intrinsic Value ⁽¹⁾	Life (Years)
Stock options outstanding	$	61	6.0
Stock options exercisable	$	61	6.0
Stock options non-vested	$	—	7.2

~~Rights~~(1) ~~Offering~~Intrinsic value is a measure of the value of those in-the-money stock options at December 31, 2024, where (i) in-the-money value is determined by comparing the option’s exercise price to the Company’s closing stock price on December 31, 2024 and (ii) only options having an exercise price less than the Company’s closing stock price on December 31, 2024 are deemed to have an intrinsic or inherent value.

OnStock-based ~~February 14,~~compensation ~~2024,~~is ~~the~~included ~~Company launched a rights offering for gross proceeds of approximately $35,800~~ in ~~which~~corporate ~~each~~administration ~~holder~~expenses ofwithin the Company’s ~~common~~consolidated ~~shares~~statements as of ~~the~~operations. ~~record~~For ~~date~~the year ofended December 1531, 2024, ~~2023 would be eligible to participate. Terms of~~ the ~~rights~~Company ~~offering~~recognized ~~include~~a ~~the~~compensation ~~issuance~~benefit ~~of one and four-tenth~~ (or ~~1.4~~negative expense) ~~subscription~~related ~~right for each common share owned by each holder on the record date with each subscription right entitling the holder~~ to ~~purchase~~stock ~~one~~option ~~common~~awards ~~share~~ of ~~the Company at a subscription price of~~ $~~0.12~~38 ~~per~~and ~~share~~for (the year ~~“basic~~ended ~~subscription privilege”). For any holder exercising its basic subscription privilege in full~~December 31, 2023, ~~the~~compensation ~~holder~~expense ~~could also exercise an oversubscription privilege to purchase additional common shares for which were unsubscribed at the expiration~~ of ~~the~~$467. ~~rights offering, subject to availability and pro rata~~

6669

Table of Contents

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, ~~2023~~2024

(all amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars except share and per share amounts)

~~allocation~~The ofbenefit ~~shares~~or ~~among~~negative ~~persons~~expense ~~exercising~~for the ~~oversubscription~~year ~~privilege.~~ended ~~The~~December ~~rights~~31, ~~offering~~2024 ~~closed~~was ondue ~~March 11,~~to ~~2024~~the ~~and~~forfeiture ~~the~~of ~~gross~~certain ~~proceeds~~stock options that resulted in the reversal of ~~$35,800~~previously ~~were~~recognized ~~received~~stock-based compensation expense.

~~The~~As ~~net proceeds from this rights offering will be utilized to progress the Company’s business strategy to support the advancement~~ of ~~the Bear Lodge REE Project~~December 31, 2024, ~~which~~there ~~includes~~was ~~funding~~approximately ~~the~~$4 ~~operation~~ of ~~the~~total ~~Demonstration~~unrecognized ~~Plant~~compensation ~~for~~cost ~~a period of time that is expected~~ to be ~~sufficient~~recognized toover ~~provide the information to support~~ a ~~commercialization~~weighted-average ~~decision,~~remaining ~~acquiring~~period ~~real~~of ~~property,~~approximately ~~updating~~0.25 ~~the mineral resource model and technical reports, and advancing permitting, environmental support, and basic engineering, as well as for other general corporate purposes~~years.

The intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023 was $9.5 and $202, respectively.

The weighted-average grant-date fair value of options granted during the year ended December 31, 2023 was $0.35. No stock options were granted during the year ended December 31, 2024.

2024 Rights Offering

On March 11, 2024, the Company completed the 2024 Rights Offering for gross proceeds of approximately $35,800 in which each holder of the Company’s common shares as of the record date of December 15, 2023 was eligible to participate. Terms of the 2024 Rights Offering included the issuance of one and four-tenth (or 1.4) subscription rights for each common share owned by each holder on the record date with each subscription right entitling the holder to purchase one common share of the Company at a subscription price of $0.12 per share (the “Basic Subscription Privilege”). For any holder exercising its Basic Subscription Privilege in full, the holder could also exercise an oversubscription privilege to purchase additional common shares that were unsubscribed for at the expiration of the 2024 Rights Offering, subject to availability and pro rata allocation of shares among persons exercising the oversubscription privilege. The 2024 Rights Offering, which generated $35,286 in net proceeds after deducting approximately $514 in transactions costs, resulted in the issuance of 298,106,831 common shares of the Company.

The net proceeds from the 2024 Rights Offering are expected to support the operations of the Demonstration Plant for a sufficient amount of time to gather the information necessary for a commercialization decision as well as support the Company’s other general corporate purposes.

10. INCOME TAX

The Company recognizes future tax assets and liabilities for each tax jurisdiction based on the difference between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities using the enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when the taxes are paid or recovered. A valuation allowance is provided against net future tax assets for which the Company does not consider the realization of such assets to meet the required “more likely than not” standard.

~~The Company’s future tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2023 and 2022 include the following components:~~70

Table of Contents

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2024

(all amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars except share and per share amounts)


	As of December 31,
	2023		2022
Deferred tax assets:
Non-current:
Noncapital loss carryforwards, Canada	$	2,725	$	2,685
Capital loss carryforwards, Canada		6		6
Net operating loss carryforwards, U.S.		24,661		23,675
Mineral properties		3,350		2,239
Reclamation provision		50		37
Equipment		103		104
Share based compensation		721		757
Research and development		109		212
Deferred tax assets		31,725		29,715
Valuation allowance		(31,725)		(29,715)
Net	$	—	$	—

Deferred tax liabilities:
Deferred tax liabilities	$	—	$	—
Net deferred tax asset/(liability)	$	—	$	—

The Company’s future tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2024 and 2023 include the following components:


	As of December 31,
	2024		2023
Deferred tax assets:
Non-current:
Noncapital loss carryforwards, Canada	$	2,674	$	2,725
Capital loss carryforwards, Canada		6		6
Net operating loss carryforwards, U.S.		25,957		24,661
Mineral properties		6,513		3,350
Reclamation provision		53		50
Equipment		1		103
Share based compensation		726		721
Research and development		36		109
Deferred tax assets		35,966		31,725
Valuation allowance		(35,966)		(31,725)
Net	$	—	$	—

Deferred tax liabilities:
Deferred tax liabilities	$	—	$	—
Net deferred tax asset/(liability)	$	—	$	—

The composition of the Company’s valuation allowance by tax jurisdiction is summarized as follows:


	As of December 31,
	~~2023~~2024		~~2022~~2023
Canada	$	3,~~167~~115	$	3,~~127~~167
United States		2832,~~558~~851		2628,~~588~~558
Total valuation allowance	$	3135,~~725~~966	$	2931,~~715~~725

The valuation allowance increased by $24,~~010~~241 from the year ended December 31, ~~2022~~2023 to the year ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024. Since it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets will not be realized, the Company has recorded a full valuation allowance against the deferred tax assets.

67At December 31, 2024, the Company had U.S. federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of approximately $108,245 with expiration dates ranging from 2025 to those not having an expiration date and U.S. state NOL carryforwards of approximately $92,795 with expiration dates ranging from 2031 to 2044.

As a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, U.S. federal NOL carryforwards generated in years ending after 2017 have an indefinite carryforward period (no expiration date) rather than the 20-year carryforward period that applied to those NOL carryforwards generated in 2017 and earlier years.

Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code could apply and limit our ability to utilize a portion of our U.S. federal NOL carryforwards. However, since no Section 382 study has been completed, the actual usage of U.S. federal NOL carryforwards has not been determined.

At December 31, 2024, the Company also had Canadian non-capital loss carryforwards of approximately C$14,241, which expire from 2026 to 2043, and Canadian capital loss carryforwards of C$59 having no expiration dates.

Table of Contents

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, ~~2023~~2024

(all amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars except share and per share amounts)

At December 31, 2023, the Company had U.S. federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards of approximately $102,949 with expiration dates ranging from 2024 to those not having an expiration date and U.S. state NOL carryforwards of approximately $87,485 with expiration dates ranging from 2031 to 2043.

At December 31, 2023, the Company also had Canadian non-capital loss carryforwards of approximately C$13,625, which expire from 2026 to 2043, and Canadian capital loss carryforwards of C$59 having no expiration dates.

For financial reporting purposes, loss from continuing operations before income taxes consists of the following components:


	For the year ended December 31,
	~~2023~~2024		~~2022~~2023
Canada	$	(~~509~~437)	$	(~~487~~509)
United States		(818,~~487~~014)		(8,~~939~~487)
	$	(818,~~996~~451)	$	(98,~~426~~996)

A reconciliation of expected income tax on net income at statutory rates is as follows:


	As of December 31,
	~~2023~~2024			~~2022~~2023
Net loss	$	(818,~~996~~451)		$	(98,~~426~~996)
Statutory tax rate		27	%		27	%
Tax expense at statutory rate		(24,~~429~~982)			(2,~~545~~429)

State taxes		(~~287~~626)			(~~277~~287)
Foreign rate differential		~~496~~1,082			~~477~~496
Change in tax rates		613			5561
Stock-based compensation		48—			~~248~~48
Nondeductible expenses		13(3)			1713
Prior year true-up		88285			~~(215)~~88
Change in valuation allowance		24,~~010~~241			2,~~240~~010
Income tax expense	$	—		$	—

The Company does not have any unrecognized income tax benefits. Should the Company incur interest and penalties relating to tax uncertainties, such amounts would be classified as a component of interest expense and operating expense, respectively.

Rare Element files income tax returns in the Canadian federal and provincial jurisdictions, while its wholly owned subsidiary, Rare Element Resources, Inc., files U.S. federal and state tax returns. The years still open for audit are generally the current year plus the previous three. However, because we have NOL carryforwards, certain items attributable to closed tax years are still subject to adjustment by applicable taxing authorities through an adjustment to tax losses carried forward to open years.

Table of Contents

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2023

(all amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars except share and per share amounts)

11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Potential Environmental Contingency

The Company’s exploration and development activities are subject to various federal and state laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment. These laws and regulations are continually changing and generally have become more restrictive. The Company conducts its operations to protect public health and the environment and believes that its operations are materially in compliance with all applicable laws and regulations. The Company has made, and expects to make in the future, expenditures to comply with such laws and regulations. The ultimate amount of reclamation and other future site-restoration costs to be incurred for existing mining interests is uncertain.

Contract Commitment – Related Party

Pursuant to the Cost Share Agreement between the Company and General Atomics, as extended and as ~~discussed~~expected ~~more~~to ~~fully~~be amended in mid-2025, and as discussed in Note 4, the Company has agreed to assume and pay for ~~approximately~~certain ~~one-half~~allowable ~~of the~~ costs ~~incurred by General Atomics and the other consortium members for the design, construction, operation, and decommissioning of the Demonstration Plant.~~

Asset Purchase Agreement

On October 25, 2021, the Company and Whitelaw Creek LLC, a Wyoming limited liability company (“Whitelaw Creek”), entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the asset purchase agreement dated October 20, 2016 between the Company and Whitelaw Creek (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”). The Amendment modified certain provisions of the Asset Purchase Agreement related to the terms and conditions of the Company’s option to repurchase (the “Repurchase Option”) approximately 640 acres of non-core real property located in Crook County, Wyoming, that is under consideration for a waste rock facility for the Bear Lodge REE Project. Pursuant to and subject to the terms of the Amendment, among other things, the term of the Repurchase Option (which was to expire on October 26, 2021) was extended for up to three additional years, subject to annual option extension payments from the Company to Whitelaw Creek of $25 in cash per year (each, a “Repurchase Option Extension Payment”); and the exercise price of the Repurchase Option was increased from $1,000 to a price to be determined by a mutually agreed upon real estate appraiser (the “Repurchase Price”), provided that (i) the Repurchase Price must not be less than $1,200 or greater than $1,850 and (ii) any Repurchase Option Extension Payments paid by the Company to Whitelaw Creek must be credited toward the Company’s payment of the Repurchase Price if the Repurchase Option is later exercised. In October 2023, the Company made the $25 Repurchase Option Extension Payment to Whitelaw Creek to extend the term of the Repurchase Option through October 26, 2024.

12. SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE WITH RESPECT TO CASH FLOWS

The Company did not have any significant non-cash transactions during the years ended December 31, 2023 or 2022.

13. SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company operates in a single reportable operating segment; that segment being the exploration of mineral properties. The Company’s chief executive officer, who is the chief operating decision maker, reviews financial information on an aggregate basis for evaluating financial performance. All of the Company’s long-lived assets are located in the United States.

Table of Contents

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, ~~2023~~2024

(all amounts stated in thousands of U.S. dollars except share and per share amounts)

under the DoE-approved Demonstration Plant budget incurred by General Atomics and the other consortium members for the design, construction, operation, and decommissioning of the Demonstration Plant.

12. SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE WITH RESPECT TO CASH FLOWS

The Company did not have any significant non-cash transactions during the year ended December 31, 2023. During October 2024, the Company issued 5,000,000 common shares, having a fair value of $1,950, as partial payment for the repurchase of the Section 16 property. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a more complete discussion of the Land Repurchase.

13. SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company operates in a single reportable operating segment; that segment being minerals exploration and development. The Company’s sole minerals exploration property is its Bear Lodge Property, located near the town of Sundance in the state of Wyoming. The segment, which includes the Demonstration Plant project, does not presently generate any revenues and is not in operation. The Company’s chief executive officer, who is the chief operating decision maker, reviews financial information on an aggregate basis for evaluating financial performance. All of the Company’s long-lived assets are associated with its Bear Lodge Property and are located in the United States.

14. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

~~Management Change~~None.

On January 2, 2024, Mr. Berg notified the Company of his decision to resign as the President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director of the Company, in each case effective as of April 2, 2024, unless sooner terminated by the Company. On March 14, 2024, the Company and Mr. Berg agreed that such resignations would take effect on March 20, 2024. Also on March 14, 2024, the Company’s Board of Directors appointed (i) Kelli Kast, a current director of the Company, as the interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, in each case effective as of March 20, 2024, and (ii) Kenneth Mushinski as the President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director of the Company, in each case effective as of May 1, 2024.

Receipt of WEA Funds

On January 31, 2024, the Company received payment of $2,000 from the WEA for an amount that had been billed in December 2023 and that was reflected in the Company’s December 31, 2023 Consolidated Balance Sheet as a grant receivable.

Rights Offering

In March 2024, the Company completed a rights offering for gross proceeds of approximately $35,800 in which each holder of the Company’s common shares as of the record date of December 15, 2023 was eligible to participate.

7073

Table of Contents

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

~~There were no changes in or disagreements with accountants on accounting or financial disclosures that were not previously included in a Current Report on Form 8-K of the Company~~None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The principal executive officer and principal financial officer, with the supervision of the Board of Directors and Audit Committee and participation of management, have evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act), as of December 31, ~~2023~~2024. Based on the evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures in place are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting of the Company. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers, and effected by our Board of Directors, management, and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

●

pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

●

provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

●

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of their inherent limitations, internal controls over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2023~~2024. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth in the Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on management’s assessment, we have concluded that, as of December 31, ~~2023~~2024, our internal control over financial reporting was effective. Because we are a smaller reporting company and a non-accelerated filer, our independent registered public accounting firm is not required to attest to or issue a report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

Insider Trading Arrangements and Policies

During the quarter ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024, none of our directors or executive officers adopted or terminated a “Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” or a “non-Rule 10b5-1 trading arrangement” (as those terms are defined in Item 408 of Regulation S-K).

ITEM 9C. DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS

Not applicable.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors

The following sets forth certain information about each of the Company’s seven directors. The table below sets out the names and ages of the Company’s directors; their provinces or states and country of residence; the offices they hold within the Company, if any; their occupations; and the dates since which they have served as directors of the Company: There are no family relationships among any directors or officers of the Company.

6975

Table of Contents



Name, Age, Province or State and Country of Residence and Current Positions, if any, held in the Company		Unless otherwise indicated below, served as director since
BRENT D. BERG, 52Wyoming, USADirectorPresident and Chief Executive Officer, Rare Element Resources Ltd.		November 8, 2022
GERALD W. GRANDEY, 78 (1)(2)Saskatoon, CanadaDirectorFormer Chief Executive Officer, Cameco Corporation		August 2, 2013
BARTON S. BRUNDAGE, 61 (1)Colorado, USADirectorPresident, Cordillera Corporation		December 18, 2019
CRAIG S. BARTELS, 76 (3)Arizona, USADirectorPresident and Chief Executive Officer, General Atomics Uranium Resources LLC		April 4, 2024
NICOLE J. CHAMPINE, 53 (2)Colorado, USADirectorVice President and General Counsel, Cordillera Corporation		March 31, 2022
BARTON S. BRUNDAGE, 62 (1)Colorado, USADirectorPresident, Cordillera Corporation		December 18, 2019
GERALD W. GRANDEY, 77 (1)(3)Saskatoon, CanadaDirectorFormer Chief Executive Officer, Cameco Corporation		August 2, 2013
NICOLE J. CHAMPINE, 54 (3)Colorado, USADirectorVice President and General Counsel, Cordillera Corporation		March 31, 2022
PAUL J. HICKEY, 74 (2)Wyoming, USADirectorAttorney		August 22, 2023
PAUL J. HICKEY, 74 (3)Wyoming, USADirectorAttorney		August 22, 2023
KELLI C. KAST, 57 (2)Colorado, USADirectorConsultant, Rare Element Resources, Inc.		August 23, 2022
KENNETH J. MUSHINSKI, 62Texas, USAPresident and Chief Executive Officer, Rare Element Resources, Ltd.		May 1, 2024
DAVID I. ROBERTS, 86 (1)(2)California, USADirectorPresident and CEO, General Atomics Uranium Resources LLC		November 17, 2017
PAMELA L. SAXTON, 72 (1)(3)Colorado, USADirectorFormer Chief Financial Officer, Thompson Creek Metals Company		August 20, 2024

(1) Current member of the Company’s Audit Committee,. ~~of which Bart S~~Mr. Brundage is the ~~chair~~Chair.

(2) ~~Current~~Gerald ~~member~~W. ofGrandey ~~the~~was ~~Nominating,~~elected ~~Corporate~~Chairman ~~Governance~~of ~~and Compensation Committee (~~the ~~“NCG&C~~Board ~~Committee”),~~ of ~~which~~Directors ~~Nicole~~on ~~Champine~~June is10, ~~the chair~~2015.

(3) ~~Gerald~~Current W.member ~~Grandey~~of ~~was~~the ~~elected~~Nominating, ~~Chairman~~Corporate ofGovernance and Compensation Committee (the ~~Board~~“NCG&C ofCommittee”). ~~Directors~~Ms. onChampine ~~June~~is ~~10,~~the ~~2015~~Chair.

The following are brief biographies of the Company’s directors:

~~Brent~~Gerald DW. ~~Berg~~Grandey has ~~currently~~over ~~serves~~40 asyears ~~President~~of ~~and~~executive leadership in the mining industry. He is the former Chief Executive Officer ~~(“CEO”)~~of Canadian-based Cameco Corporation, one of the ~~Company.~~world’s Mrlargest uranium producers. ~~Berg~~ ~~has~~In ~~over~~2010, ~~25 years’~~Harvard ~~experience~~Business inReview ~~the~~recognized ~~mining~~Mr. Grandey ~~and~~as ~~mineral~~being ~~processing~~one ~~industry,~~of ~~including~~the ~~16 years~~Top 100 CEOs in ~~mine~~the ~~management~~world ~~roles~~because ~~and~~of ~~over~~the ~~11 years~~value ~~working~~created for ~~in-situ~~shareholders ~~recovery~~during ~~operations.~~his ~~From~~tenure ~~April~~at ~~2020~~Cameco. toAfter ~~October~~18 ~~2022~~years with Cameco, he ~~served~~retired as ~~General~~Chief ~~Manager~~Executive ofOfficer ~~Florence~~and ~~Copper~~as ~~Inc.~~a ~~From~~director ~~January~~in ~~2019~~2011. ~~to April 2020~~Previously, ~~Mr. Berg~~he ~~served~~held assenior ~~Vice~~executive ~~President~~positions ofwith ~~Sustainability,~~Concord ~~Health~~Services &and ~~Safety~~Energy ~~for~~Fuels ~~Excelsior~~Nuclear. ~~Mining Corp~~Mr. Grandey Inwas ~~addition,~~recognized hein ~~spent~~2014 ~~over~~for ~~21 years~~leadership atin ~~Canadian-based~~the ~~Cameco~~nuclear ~~Corporation~~industry inwith ~~various~~the ~~roles,~~U.S. ~~including~~Nuclear asEnergy ~~President~~Institutes’ ofWilliam ~~Cameco~~S. ~~Resources,~~Lee ~~where~~Award; heinducted ~~was~~into ~~responsible~~the ~~for~~Canadian ~~oversight~~Mining Hall of Fame in 2013; awarded the ~~company~~Canadian Nuclear Association’s ~~U.S.~~Ian ~~operations~~McRae Award in ~~Wyoming~~2012 ~~and~~for ~~Nebraska~~his ~~(2013–2018),~~work ~~General~~in ~~Manager~~advancing ofnuclear ~~Cameco~~energy ~~Corporation’s~~in ~~Smith~~Canada; ~~Ranch~~and –was ~~Highland~~nominated ~~Operation~~for (the 2011~~–2013),~~ ~~and~~Oslo ~~Director~~Business offor ~~Environmental~~Peace ~~Leadership~~Award ~~(2010–2011).~~in ~~Mr. Berg~~recognition isof ahis ~~Professional~~efforts ~~Engineer~~to ~~with~~facilitate anuclear Bdisarmament.~~A.Sc.~~ inHe ~~Regional~~is ~~Environmental~~Chairman ~~Systems~~Emeritus ~~Engineering~~for ~~from~~ the ~~University~~London-based ofWorld ~~Regina~~Nuclear ~~and~~Association, anthe ~~MBA~~former ~~from~~Chairman of the ~~University~~Colorado School of ~~Regina.~~Mines AsBoard ~~previously~~of ~~announced,~~Governors ~~Mr. Berg~~and ~~will~~a beformer ~~resigning~~board ~~from~~member ~~his~~of ~~positions~~Nutrien asLtd. ~~President~~(2018–2019), ~~and~~Potash ~~CEO~~Corporation ~~and~~of asSaskatchewan a(2011–2018), ~~director~~

7076

Table of Contents

ofCameco ~~the~~Corporation ~~Company~~(1999–2011), inCenterra ~~each~~Gold ~~case~~Inc. ~~effective April 2~~(2004–2010), Inmet ~~2024,~~Mining orCorporation ~~earlier at the discretion of the Company’s Board of Directors. On March 14~~(2012–2013), ~~2024,~~Sandspring ~~the~~Resources ~~Company and Mr~~Ltd. ~~Berg agreed that such resignations would take effect on March 20~~(2010–2015), ~~2024.~~Bruce ~~Also~~Power onCorporation ~~March~~(2002–2011) ~~14,~~and ~~2024,~~Canadian ~~the~~Oil ~~Company’s~~Sands ~~Board~~Limited ~~of Directors appointed~~ (i2011–2016). ~~Kelli~~He ~~Kast,~~has a ~~current~~degree ~~director~~in ofgeophysical ~~the~~engineering ~~Company,~~from as the ~~interim~~Colorado ~~President~~School ~~and Chief Executive Officer~~ of ~~the~~Mines ~~Company, in each case effective as of March 20, 2024,~~ and ~~(ii) Kenneth Mushinski as the President and Chief Executive Officer and as~~ a ~~director~~law ofdegree ~~the~~from ~~Company,~~Northwestern ~~in each case effective as of May 1, 2024~~University.

~~Barton~~Craig S. ~~Brundage~~ Bartels has ~~served~~over ~~since~~50 ~~May~~years ~~2021 as President~~ of ~~Cordillera~~experience ~~Corporation~~in ~~(“Cordillera”)~~the hydrocarbon, anmineral ~~affiliate~~extraction ofand ~~General~~processing ~~Atomics~~industries and ~~Synchron.~~has Inplayed ~~his~~a ~~current~~leadership role ~~and~~in ~~prior~~developing ~~position~~some of ~~Executive~~the ~~Vice~~key ~~President~~technology ~~(June~~used ~~2007–May~~globally ~~2021),~~to ~~Mr. Brundage~~optimize isIn ~~and~~Situ ~~has~~Recovery ~~been~~(ISR) ~~responsible for the day-to-day management~~ of ~~Cordillera’s real estate operations in Colorado, Utah, and California~~uranium. ~~Since~~He ~~June 2007, he~~ has served as ~~Chairman~~the ofPresident ~~the~~and ~~board~~Chief ofExecutive ~~directors~~Officer of ~~jetCenters,~~General ~~Inc.~~Atomics ~~(“JCI”),~~Uranium anResources ~~aviation~~LLC ~~fueling~~since ~~company~~May 2024 and apreviously ~~subsidiary of Cordillera. Since January 2021, Mr. Brundage has~~ served as ~~Chairman~~its ofSenior ~~the~~Vice ~~board~~President ofand ~~directors~~Chief ofOperating ~~Ohio~~Officer ~~Gas Company~~(November 2022–May 2024), awhich ~~regulated~~owns ~~gas~~the ~~utility~~stock ~~company~~of ~~based~~several inGeneral ~~Bryan,~~Atomics ~~Ohio, that is~~ affiliated ~~with~~uranium ~~Cordillera~~companies. ~~Since~~These ~~2007,~~affiliates ~~Mr. Brundage~~include ~~has~~Rio ~~also~~Grande ~~served~~Resources asCorporation ~~a director~~ and~~/or~~ ~~executive~~Nuclear ~~officer~~Fuels ~~for several other Cordillera-affiliated companies, including San Miguel Valley~~ Corporation, ~~Silver~~which ~~Cliff~~have ~~Land~~uranium ~~And~~properties ~~Cattle~~in ~~Company,~~the ~~Colorado~~United ~~Barns~~States ~~Corporation,~~and ~~First~~market ~~City~~uranium ~~Investment~~worldwide; ~~Corporation,~~Baywood ~~Lamartine~~Holdings ~~Consolidated Mines Corporation, Boston Commons,~~ Inc., ~~Oceanic~~which ~~Exploration~~owns ~~Company,~~the ~~Oceanic~~Australian ~~International~~uranium ~~Properties~~mining ~~Corporation,~~ and ~~Sorrento~~exploration ~~West~~companies ~~Properties,~~Heathgate ~~Inc.~~Resources ~~Prior~~Pty toLtd ~~his~~(“Heathgate”) ~~current position with Cordillera~~ and ~~its~~Quasar ~~affiliates,~~Resources ~~Mr. Brundage~~Pty ~~served~~Ltd; asand ~~the~~General ~~Chief~~Atomics ~~Financial~~Energy ~~Officer of JCI (July 1996–May 2007)~~Services, Inc., ~~Prior~~which tois ~~his~~a ~~position~~partner ~~with~~in ~~JCI,~~ConverDyn. Mr. ~~Brundage~~Bartels was ~~employed~~the byPresident ~~Brundage~~of &Heathgate ~~Company~~from (June 2010 ~~1985–July~~to ~~1996)~~October 2022, aand ~~regional~~he ~~investment~~has ~~banking~~served ~~firm~~as ~~specializing~~a indirector ~~mergers~~of ~~and~~Heathgate ~~acquisitions~~since ~~and long-term corporate financing~~2010. AtFrom ~~Brundage~~December 2004 &to ~~Company~~June 2010, he ~~was~~served ~~employed~~ in various ~~capacities~~roles infor ~~the~~Uranium ~~family-managed~~Resources, Inc. ~~business~~and its subsidiaries, including as Senior Vice President, ~~Senior~~of ~~Financial~~Technology ~~Analyst~~(November 2008–June 2010), ~~and~~Vice ~~Analyst.~~President Heof ~~continues~~Operations to– ~~serve~~In asSitu afor ~~member~~URI, Inc. of(February 2007–November 2008), ~~Brundage~~and &President ~~Company’s board~~ of ~~directors~~HRI, Inc. (~~since 1980~~December 2004–January 2007). Mr. ~~Brundage~~Bartels ~~received~~graduated ~~his Bachelor of Arts degree in Business Administration~~ from ~~Fort~~the ~~Lewis~~Montana ~~College~~School ~~and~~of ~~his~~Mines ~~Master~~with ofa ~~Business~~B.S. ~~Administration~~in ~~from~~Petroleum ~~the~~Engineering ~~University~~in ~~of Denver~~1972.

~~Nicole~~Barton JS. ~~Champine~~ Brundage has served assince ~~Vice~~May 2021 as President ~~and~~of ~~General~~Cordillera ~~Counsel~~Corporation of (“Cordillera”), an affiliate of General Atomics, ~~since~~and ~~July~~Synchron. In his current role and prior position of Executive Vice President (June 2007–May 2021), Mr. Brundage is and ~~previously~~has ~~served~~been asresponsible for the day-to-day management of Cordillera’s ~~Legal~~real ~~Counsel~~estate ~~(July~~operations ~~2001–July~~in ~~2007)~~Colorado, Utah, and California. ~~She~~Since June 2007, he has served as ~~the~~Chairman ~~President~~of ~~and~~the aboard ~~director~~ of ~~San~~directors ~~Miguel~~of ~~Valley~~jetCenters, Inc. ~~Corporation~~(“JCI”), an aviation fueling company and a subsidiary of Cordillera. Since January 2021, ~~since~~Mr. Brundage ~~June~~has ~~2007~~served ~~and~~as ~~July~~Chairman ~~2009~~of the board of directors of Ohio Gas Company, ~~respectively.~~a Inregulated ~~addition~~gas utility company based in Bryan, ~~since~~Ohio, ~~May~~that ~~2010~~is affiliated with Cordillera. Since 2007, MsMr. ~~Champine~~Brundage has also served as ~~the~~a ~~President~~director and/or aexecutive ~~director~~officer offor ~~Oceanic~~several ~~Exploration~~other ~~Company~~Cordillera-affiliated companies, anincluding ~~oil~~San ~~and~~Miguel ~~gas~~Valley ~~exploration~~Corporation, ~~company~~Silver ~~affiliated~~Cliff ~~with~~Land ~~Cordillera.~~And ~~From~~Cattle ~~May~~Company, ~~1998~~Colorado toBarns ~~June~~Corporation, ~~2001~~First City Investment Corporation, ~~she~~Lamartine ~~was~~Consolidated aMines ~~real~~Corporation, ~~estate~~Boston Commons, Inc., Oceanic Exploration Company, Oceanic International Properties Corporation, and ~~land~~Sorrento ~~development~~West ~~lawyer~~Properties, Inc. atMr. Brundage ~~the~~also ~~law~~serves ~~firm~~as a Vice President of ~~Otten,~~a ~~Johnson,~~General ~~Robinson~~Atomics affiliated company, ~~Neff~~Rio &Grande ~~Ragonetti,~~Resources PCorporation.C. Prior ~~From~~to ~~June~~his ~~1993~~current toposition ~~August~~with ~~1995~~Cordillera and its affiliates, MsMr. ~~Champine~~Brundage served as athe ~~project~~Chief ~~engineer~~Financial ~~for~~Officer ~~Peter~~of ~~Kiewit~~JCI (July 1996–May 2007). Prior to his current position with JCI, he was employed by Brundage & ~~Sons~~Company (June 1985–July 1996), a regional investment banking firm specializing in ~~Utah~~mergers and ~~Colorado~~acquisitions onand ~~heavy~~long-~~highway~~term ~~projects~~corporate financing. ~~She~~At ~~received~~Brundage & ~~her~~Company, ~~Bachelor~~he ofwas ~~Science~~employed in ~~Structural~~various ~~Engineering~~capacities ~~from~~in the ~~University~~family-managed business, including Vice President, Senior Financial Analyst, and Analyst. He continues to serve as a member of ~~Texas~~Brundage & atCompany’s ~~Austin~~board of directors (since 1980). Mr. Brundage received his Bachelor of Arts in Business Administration from Fort Lewis College and ~~her~~his ~~Juris~~Master ~~Doctorate~~of Business Administration from the University of Denver.

Gerald W. Grandey has over 40 years of executive leadership in the mining industry. He is the former Chief Executive Officer of Canadian-based Cameco Corporation, one of the world’s largest uranium producers. In 2010, Harvard Business Review recognized Mr. Grandey as being one of the Top 100 CEOs in the world because of the value created for shareholders during his tenure at Cameco. After 18 years with Cameco, he retired as Chief Executive Officer and as a director in 2011. Previously, he held senior executive positions with Concord Services and Energy Fuels Nuclear. Mr. Grandey was recognized in 2014 for leadership in the nuclear industry with the U.S. Nuclear Energy Institutes’ William S. Lee Award; inducted into the Canadian Mining Hall of Fame in 2013; awarded the Canadian Nuclear Association’s Ian McRae Award in 2012 for his work in advancing nuclear energy in Canada; and was nominated for the 2011 Oslo Business for Peace Award in recognition of his efforts to facilitate nuclear disarmament. He is the Vice Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Colorado School of Mines Foundation and is Chairman Emeritus for the London-based World Nuclear Association. Mr. Grandey is a former board member of Nutrien Ltd. (2018–2019), Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan (2011–2018), Cameco Corporation (1999–2011), Centerra Gold Inc. (2004–2010), Inmet Mining Corporation (2012–2013), Sandspring Resources Ltd. (2010–2015), Bruce Power Corporation (2002–2011) and Canadian Oil Sands Limited (2011–2016). He has a degree in geophysical engineering from the Colorado School of Mines and a law degree from Northwestern University.

~~Paul~~Nicole J. ~~Hickey~~Champine has isserved aas ~~Wyoming~~Vice ~~attorney~~President ~~whose~~and ~~practice~~General Counsel of Cordillera, (since July 2007), and Vice President of Rio Grande Resources Corporation (since February 2025), both affiliates of General Atomics. Ms. Champine previously served as Cordillera’s Legal Counsel (July 2001–July 2007). She has ~~focused~~served onas ~~energy~~the President and ~~natural~~a ~~resource~~director ~~issues~~of San Miguel Valley Corporation, a subsidiary of Cordillera, since June 2007 and July 2009, respectively. MrIn addition, since May 2010, Ms. ~~Hickey~~Champine ~~practiced~~has ~~law~~served ~~from~~as ~~1975~~the ~~until~~President ~~his~~and ~~retirement~~a indirector ~~2022~~of Oceanic Exploration Company, an oil and gas exploration company affiliated with Cordillera. From ~~1976~~May 1998 to ~~2022~~June 2001, heshe was a ~~partner~~real ~~with~~estate and land development lawyer at the law firm of ~~Rooney~~Otten, &Johnson, ~~Horiskey~~Robinson, ~~which later became Hickey~~ Neff & ~~Evans~~Ragonetti, ~~LLP~~P.C. ~~Since~~From June 1993 ~~2022~~to August 1995, heMs. Champine ~~has~~ served as a ~~consultant~~project toengineer ~~Rare~~for ~~Element~~Peter Kiewit & Sons in Utah and Colorado on heavy-highway projects. She received her Bachelor of Science in Structural Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin and her Juris Doctorate from the University of Denver.

71Paul J. Hickey is a Wyoming attorney whose practice has focused on energy and natural resource issues. From 1976 to 2022, he was a partner with the law firm of Rooney & Horiskey, which later became Hickey & Evans, LLP. Since June 2022, he has served as a consultant to Rare Element Resources, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company. Over the years of his practice, Mr. Hickey was a leading energy law attorney in the Rocky Mountain region. He represented regulated

Table of Contents

~~Resources, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company. Over the years of his practice, Mr. Hickey was a leading energy law attorney in the Rocky Mountain region. He represented regulated~~ utilities in Wyoming, Utah and Idaho. In addition, he has represented natural gas producers, interstate natural gas pipelines, renewable energy projects and interstate transmission projects. Mr. Hickey represented the State of Wyoming before the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) in the certification proceedings for the Kern River Interstate natural gas pipeline. During his career, Mr. Hickey served numerous leadership roles in national, state and local bar associations. He has served on the University of Wyoming Law School Advisory ~~Committee~~Board since 2002 and was Chairman of that Committee until 2022. Mr. Hickey helped develop the Summer Trial Institute at the University of Wyoming College of Law and continues to teach at this Institute. In 2009, Mr. Hickey was made an Honorary Member of the Order of the Coif by the Faculty of the University of Wyoming College of Law. In 2019, he was recognized as a Distinguished Alumni of the University of Wyoming College of Law. From 1997 to 1998, he served as President of the Wyoming Bar Association. In 2021, the Wyoming Bar presented Mr. Hickey the Gerald R. Mason Professionalism Award. ~~In 2019, he was recognized as a Distinguished Alumni of the University of Wyoming College of Law.~~ Mr. Hickey ~~also~~served ~~was~~as ~~recognized~~a byRegent on the American College of Trial Lawyers ~~for his service as a Regent on its National~~ Board of Regents. ~~Following his graduation~~ from ~~the~~2016 ~~University~~to of2020. ~~Wyoming College of Law,~~ Mr. Hickey served as a Law Clerk to the Honorable James E. Barrett, United States Court of Appeal Tenth Circuit. He has served as the Wyoming Representative on the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals’ Advisory Committee. He also served as a Director and President of the Historical Society of the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals. Mr. Hickey graduated from the University of Wyoming with a BABachelor of Arts in History in 1972 and a Juris Doctorate in 1975.

~~Kelli~~Kenneth CJ. ~~Kast~~Mushinski currently ~~has~~serves ~~over~~as ~~25 years~~President ofand ~~in-house~~Chief ~~legal~~Executive ~~experience,~~Officer ~~including~~(“CEO”) ~~seven~~of ~~years~~the asCompany. aMr. Mushinski has ~~top~~served ~~legal~~as ~~officer~~the inChairman of the ~~precious~~board ~~metals~~of ~~industry,~~directors ~~and~~of ~~12 years~~Anfield inEnergy ~~the~~Inc. ~~rare~~since ~~earth industry~~September 2022. ~~She~~He ~~has~~previously served as a ~~consultant~~director of ~~Rare~~the ~~Element~~Company ~~Resources,~~(November ~~Inc.~~2017–March 2022), aChairman ~~subsidiary~~ of ~~the~~Cotter ~~Company,~~Corporation ~~since June 2015~~N.S.L. ~~From~~(October 2011–March 2022), ~~July~~and ~~2012~~a tomanagement ~~May~~committee ~~2015,~~member ~~Ms. Kast~~for ~~served as~~ the ~~Vice President,~~ Honeywell/General ~~Counsel,~~Atomics ~~Chief~~ConverDyn ~~Administrative~~partnership ~~Officer~~(June 2016–March 2022). ~~and~~In ~~Corporate~~addition, ~~Secretary~~Mr. Mushinski ofwas the ~~Company.~~President ~~She~~of ~~served~~Synchron as(September 2017–March 2022); ~~Coeur d’Alene Mine Corporation’s~~ Vice President, ~~General~~Corporate ~~Counsel~~Planning and ~~Corporate~~Acquisitions ~~Secretary~~of ~~from~~General ~~May~~Atomics ~~2005~~Technologies toCorporation (February 2014–March 2022); ~~2009~~President ~~and~~of asQuasar ~~its~~Resources ~~Chief~~Pty ~~Administrative~~Ltd ~~Officer from~~ (November 2014–March 2022); ~~2009~~Vice toPresident, ~~December~~Sales ~~2011.~~and ~~From~~Marketing ~~2004~~of toNuclear ~~2005,~~Fuels ~~Ms.~~Corporation (June ~~Kast~~2006–March 2022); ~~served~~Engineering asManager ~~Corporate Counsel~~ for ~~HealtheTech Inc.~~General ~~From~~Atomics ~~1997~~Electronics toSystems ~~2003,~~(2002–2006); ~~she~~Lead ~~served~~Mechanical asEngineer ~~the Assistant General Counsel and Corporate Secretary~~ for ~~Global~~Electronic ~~Water Technologies Inc. and Psychrometric~~ Systems, Inc. ~~From~~(1995–2002); ~~January~~and ~~1996~~Senior ~~through~~Reactor ~~December~~Operator ~~1997,~~at ~~she~~General ~~served~~Atomics ~~as corporate counsel for Boise Cascade~~(1989–2012). MsMr. ~~Kast~~Mushinski ~~earned~~received ~~her~~a ~~Juris~~Bachelor ~~Doctor~~of ~~from~~Science ~~the~~in ~~University~~Mechanical ofEngineering ~~South~~(summa ~~Dakota~~cum ~~School~~laude) ~~of Law~~ and ~~her~~a ~~Bachelor~~Master’s ~~degree~~in Business Administration, both from ~~the~~San ~~University~~Diego ofState ~~Idaho~~University.

~~David~~Pamela IL. ~~Roberts~~ Saxton is ~~the~~an ~~President~~experienced ~~and~~mining ~~Chief~~company ~~Executive~~executive ~~Officer~~and ~~of General Atomics Uranium Resources LLC (since August 2007), which owns the stock of several General Atomics affiliated uranium companies~~director. ~~These~~She ~~affiliates~~has ~~include~~served ~~Rio~~as ~~Grande~~a ~~Resources~~director ~~Corporation~~ and ~~Nuclear Fuels Corporation, which have uranium properties in~~ the ~~United~~Audit ~~States~~Committee ~~and~~Chair ~~market~~of ~~uranium~~Bunker ~~worldwide;~~Hill ~~Baywood~~Mining ~~Holdings Inc~~Corp., ~~which~~since ~~owns~~October ~~the~~2020. ~~Australian uranium mining and exploration companies Heathgate Resources Pty Ltd and Quasar Resources Pty Ltd; and General Atomics Energy Services~~Previously, ~~Inc.,~~she ~~which~~served isas a ~~partner~~director inand ~~ConverDyn. Mr. Roberts holds~~ the ~~following~~Audit ~~positions~~Committee atChair ~~the indicated privately held companies, all~~ of ~~which~~Timberline ~~are~~Resources ~~affiliates~~Corporation ~~of General Atomics: President of Systems Integration, LLC~~ (~~since~~May ~~September~~2021-August ~~2017~~2024), ~~General~~and ~~Atomics~~Pershing ~~Global~~Gold Corporation (~~since~~November ~~December~~2017-April 2019), ~~and~~as ~~General~~a ~~Atomics~~director ~~Aeronautical UK Ltd (since December 2011); Senior Vice President~~ of ~~General~~Aquila ~~Atomics~~Resources ~~(since August 2016); and Director of Sequoyah Fuels International Corp~~Inc. (~~since~~June ~~July~~2019–December ~~2016~~2021), ~~Diazyme~~and ~~Laboratories~~on ~~Inc.~~the ~~(since~~North ~~July~~American ~~2016),~~Advisory ~~Aeronautical~~Board ~~Systems~~of ~~Inc.~~Damstra ~~(since~~Technology–Damstra ~~July~~Holdings ~~2018)~~Limited ~~and Synchron~~ (~~since~~February ~~September~~2021–October ~~2017~~2022). ~~His~~As ~~previous~~an ~~positions~~executive, atshe ~~General~~served ~~Atomics include 19 years~~ as ~~Senior~~the Executive Vice President ofand ~~the~~Chief ~~Advanced~~Financial ~~Technologies~~Officer ~~Group~~ of ~~General~~Thompson ~~Atomics~~Creek Metals Company (~~June~~August ~~1988~~2008–~~August~~October ~~2007~~2016), ~~where~~and heas ~~was responsible for divisions involved in~~ the ~~development~~Chief ~~and~~Financial ~~application~~Officer of ~~advanced~~NewWest ~~technologies~~Gold ~~for~~Corporation ~~defense, energy and transport applications. Previously, he held staff positions performing research and development in support of advanced nuclear reactor programs~~ (~~June~~April ~~1968~~2006–~~June~~December ~~1988~~2007). ~~Prior~~Having tostarted ~~joining~~her ~~General~~professional ~~Atomics,~~life ~~Mr. Roberts~~working ~~was~~as ~~associated~~an ~~with~~auditor ~~the~~at ~~General~~Arthur ~~Electric~~Andersen ~~Company~~in ~~(May~~Denver, ~~1967–May 1968)~~Colorado, ~~where~~her hecareer ~~was~~has ~~involved~~included insenior ~~development~~finance ~~and~~appointments ~~manufacture~~in ofthe ~~military~~American ~~re-entry~~natural ~~vehicles~~resources industry, ~~and~~including ~~with~~serving ~~Rolls~~as ~~Royce~~the ~~and~~Vice ~~Associates~~President ~~(U.K.) supporting design and construction~~ of ~~nuclear~~Finance ~~submarine reactors~~ for ~~the~~Franco-Nevada ~~Royal~~Corporation’s ~~Navy. Mr. Roberts was educated at London University and received an MIM (Materials Engineering) in 1960. He is a registered professional engineer in California, a chartered engineer (~~U.KS.), ~~and a member of numerous professional associations~~operations.

7278

Table of Contents

Executive Officers

The Company’s current executive officers, their state and country of residence, the offices they hold within the Company, and the dates since which they have served as officers of the Company are as follows:


Name, Age, Province or State and Country of Residence and Positions, current and former, if any, held in the Company		Served as officer since
Brent D. Berg, 52Wyoming, USAPresident and CEO		November 1, 2022
KENNETH J. MUSHINSKI, 62Texas, USADirector, President and CEO		May 1, 2024
WAYNE E. RICH, 59Colorado, USAChief Financial Officer		March 28, 2022
WAYNE E. RICH, 60Colorado, USAChief Financial Officer		March 28, 2022
KELLI C. KAST, 58Colorado, USAVice President, General Counsel and Chief Administrative Office ("CAO")		July 1, 2024
JAYE T. PICKARTS, 66Colorado, USAChief Operating Officer		October 1, 2024

~~Brent~~Kenneth DJ. ~~Berg~~Mushinski. See “Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance—Directors” above for biographical information regarding Mr. ~~Berg~~Mushinski.

Wayne E. Rich ~~most recently~~ served as Vice President of Finance, Treasurer and Corporate Secretary of Eden Innovations LLC from August 2017 to March 2022. He served as Chief Financial Officer of Star Mountain Resources, Inc. from November 2015 to January 2017 and as Chief Financial Officer of Northern Zinc, LLC from May 2015 to November 2015, when it was acquired by Star Mountain Resources, Inc., which filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in February 2018. Mr. Rich served in various capacities at Prospect Global Resources, Inc., a publicly traded mining company, including as Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Finance (September 2011–December 2012) and Senior Vice President of Accounting and Treasury (December 2012–May 2014). From October 2008 to September 2011, he served as Treasurer and Director of Corporate Finance of Thompson Creek Metals Inc., a publicly traded metals and mining company. Prior to that, he served in several capacities at The Doe Run Resources Corporation, an integrated mining and metals manufacturing company, from August 1998 to October 2008, including as Treasurer (April 2007–October 2008) and Assistant Treasurer (July 2004–April 2007). Mr. Rich began his career with KPMG Peat Marwick. Mr. Rich holds a Master’s in Business Administration from Illinois State University and a Bachelor of Science in Accountancy from Eastern Illinois University.

Kelli C. Kast has nearly 30 years of in-house legal experience, including seven years as a top legal officer in the precious metals industry, and over 12 years in the rare earth industry. Ms. Kast has served as a director and Chair of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee of Bunker Hill Mining Corp. since October 2024. She served as a consultant to Rare Element Resources, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company from June 2015 through June 2024 and served as the interim President and CEO of the Company from March 2024 to May 2024. Ms. Kast additionally served as a director of the Company from August 2022 to August 2024. From July 2012 to May 2015, Ms. Kast served as the Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Administrative Officer and Corporate Secretary of the Company. Prior to her tenure with the Company, she served as Coeur d’Alene Mine Corporation’s Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary from May 2005 to March 2009 and as its Chief Administrative Officer from March 2009 to March 2012. From 2004 to 2005, Ms. Kast served as Corporate Counsel for HealtheTech Inc. From 1997 to 2003, she served as the Assistant General Counsel and Corporate Secretary for Global Water Technologies Inc. and Psychrometric Systems, Inc. Ms. Kast earned her Juris Doctor from the University of South Dakota School of Law and her Bachelor’s degree from the University of Idaho.

Jaye T. Pickarts is an accomplished professional with over 40 years of experience in mine development, mineral processing, and environmental compliance. Mr. Pickarts is a Registered Professional Engineer (PE), SME Registered Member, and Qualified Person (QP), and has completed several NI 43-101 compliant preliminary economic assessments

Table of Contents

(PEA), feasibility studies (PFS/FS), and due diligence for acquisition throughout his career. Mr. Pickarts has additional experience in engineering design, construction oversite, mine reclamation, mine closure, and water management. He has extensive experience with both domestic and international projects. His management experience includes the oversight of design engineers and staff on various industrial projects. Previously, Mr. Pickarts has worked as an independent consultant for various mining companies, including the Company (2016 - 2024) and as a Senior Project Manager for Tetra Tech, Inc. (2018 - 2023). He was also the Chief Operating Officer for the Company from 2011 to 2016. Prior to that, he was a Director and Principal for Knight Piesold and Co from 1999 to 2011. He has also worked in various operations management positions for Pegasus Gold Corporation, Brewer Gold Company, Texasgulf Minerals and Metals, Inc., Freeport-McMoRan, and Kennecott Copper. Mr. Pickarts has a BS in Metallurgical (Mineral Processing) Engineering from Montana Technological University.

Corporate Cease Trade Orders or Bankruptcies

To the knowledge of the Company, no director of the Company is, or within the 10 years prior to the date of this Annual Report has been, a director or executive officer of any company that (i) was subject to a cease trade or similar order or an order that denied the relevant company access to any exemption under securities legislation, for a period of more than 30 consecutive days (any of the foregoing being an “order”), that was issued while he or she was acting in the capacity of director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer of that company; or (ii) was subject to an order that was issued after he or she ceased to be a director, chief executive officer or chief financial officer and which resulted from an event that occurred while he or she was acting in that capacity.

To the knowledge of the Company, no director of the Company is, or within the 10 years prior to the date of this Annual Report has been, a director or executive officer of any company that (i) was bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or became subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold his or her assets; or (ii) within one year of his or her ceasing to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets.

Individual Bankruptcies

No director of the Company has, within the 10 years prior to the date of this Annual Report, become bankrupt or made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or been subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold the assets of that individual.

Table of Contents

arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold the assets of that individual.

Penalties or Sanctions

None of the directors ~~of the Company~~ has (i) been subject to any penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to securities legislation or by a securities regulatory authority, (ii) entered into a settlement agreement with a securities regulatory authority or (iii) been subject to any other penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered important to a reasonable security holder making a decision about whether to vote for the director or in making an investment decision.

Indebtedness of Directors and Executive Officers

None of the current or former directors or executive officers of the Company, nor any associate or affiliate of the foregoing persons, are or have been indebted to the Company since the beginning of the fiscal  year ended December  31, ~~2023~~2024.

Management Contracts

No management functions of the Company are, to any substantial degree, performed by a person or company other than the directors or executive officers of the Company, in their roles as such.

Table of Contents

Corporate Governance

Ethical Business Conduct

The Board has adopted a Code of Conduct, which is based on the fundamental principles of honesty, loyalty, fairness, forthrightness, and use of common sense in general. The Code of Conduct is available on the Company’s website at www.rareelementresources.com and on the Canadian System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR+”) at www.sedarplus.ca. The Code of Conduct applies to all directors, officers and employees, including the principal executive, financial and accounting officers. The Audit Committee is responsible for setting the standards of business conduct contained in the Code of Conduct, and it annually reviews the Code of Conduct.

The Board, through the NCG&C Committee, is responsible for monitoring compliance with the Code of Conduct. The NCG&C Committee reviews, with management, any issues with respect to compliance with the Code of Conduct. The Board discloses on the Company’s website any waiver from a provision of its Code of Conduct that applies to any of its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions that relates to any element of its Code of Conduct. No waivers were granted from the requirements of the Company’s Code of Conduct during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, or during the subsequent period through to the date of this Annual Report. 

The Board, through the NCG&C Committee, is responsible for monitoring compliance with the Code of Conduct. The NCG&C Committee reviews, with management, any issues with respect to compliance with the Code of Conduct. The Board discloses on the Company’s website any waiver from a provision of its Code of Conduct that applies to any of its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller or persons performing similar functions that relates to any element of its Code of Conduct. No waivers were granted from the requirements of the Company’s Code of Conduct during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, or during the subsequent period through to the date of this Annual Report.

The Board ensures that the directors exercise independent judgment in considering transactions and agreements in respect of which a director or executive officer has a material interest. The Code of Conduct sets out the procedure with respect to reporting conflicts of interest. Actual or potential conflicts of interests are reported to the Chair of the NCG&C Committee. Members of the NCG&C Committee are required to be particularly vigilant in reviewing and approving conflicts of interests.

Standing Board Committees

Audit Committee

The Company has a separately designated, standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. Under Canadian securities laws, the Company is required to have an audit committee comprised of not less than three directors. Each member of the Audit Committee must meet the independence requirements imposed by applicable law and must not be an employee, officer, or affiliate of the Company. The Company’s current Audit Committee consists of Barton S. Brundage (Chair), Gerald W. Grandey, and Pamela L. Saxton. The Audit Committee’s functions are to oversee the accounting and financial reporting process and the audit of the annual financial statements of the Company. The Audit Committee met five times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024.

Table of Contents

consists of Barton S. Brundage (Chair), Gerald W. Grandey, and David I. Roberts. The Audit Committee’s functions are to oversee the accounting and financial reporting process and the audit of the annual financial statements of the Company. The Audit Committee met five times during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023.

Audit Committee Charter

The Audit Committee, under the guidance of the Audit Committee Charter approved by the Board, assists the Board in fulfilling its oversight responsibilities by reviewing (i)  the financial statements, reports and other information provided to shareholders, regulators and others; (ii)  the independent auditor’s qualifications, independence and performance; (iii)  the internal controls that management and the Board have established; (iv)  the audit, accounting and financial reporting processes generally; (v) risk management program completeness and effectiveness; and (vvi)  compliance by the Company with legal and regulatory requirements. The text of the Audit Committee’s Charter is furnished with this Annual Report as Exhibit 99.1 hereto and is also available on the Company’s website at www.rareelementresources.com.

Independence

The Board has determined that ~~all~~two of the members of the Company’s Audit Committee are independent within the meaning of National Instrument 52-110 – Audit Committees (“NI 52-110”). The Board determined that Mr. Grandey and Ms. Saxton are independent, but that Mr. Brundage is not independent based upon his employment with an affiliate of

Table of Contents

Synchron, the Company’s majority shareholder. As a result, the Audit Committee is comprised of a majority of independent directors.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

The ~~Company’s~~ Board has determined that Barton S. Brundage, Chair of the Audit Committee, satisfies the requirement of an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under Item  407 of ~~the~~ Regulation  S-K, and each of Messrs.  Brundage, Grandey and ~~Roberts~~Saxton is “financially literate” within the meaning thereof set forth in NI  52-110. See above under Part III, Item 10. “Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance—Directors” for a description of the relevant education and experience of each of the Audit Committee members.

Nominating, Corporate Governance, and Compensation Committee

The current members of the NCG&C Committee are Nicole J. Champine (Chair), ~~Paul~~Craig JS. ~~Hickey~~Bartels, ~~David~~Paul IJ. ~~Roberts~~Hickey, and ~~Kelli~~Pamela CL. ~~Kast~~Saxton. ~~Ms. Champine~~Three ~~and~~of ~~Mr. Roberts~~the current members of the NCG&C Committee are not considered to be independent directors within the meaning of NI  58-101. The Board determined that Ms. Champine and Mr. Bartels are not independent based upon their employment with an affiliate of Synchron, the Company’s majority shareholder. The Board determined that Mr. Hickey is not independent based upon his position as, among other things, a consultant to a subsidiary of the Company. The NCG&C Committee met four times during the fiscal year ended December  31, ~~2023~~2024.

NCG&C Committee Charter

The NCG&C Committee is governed by a charter which sets forth the NCG&C Committee functions, which are, among other things, to establish procedures for the director nomination process and recommend nominees for election to the Board; to develop and periodically review the effectiveness of the Board’s corporate governance guidelines; and to determine and recommend to the independent members of the Board the base salaries and annual incentive awards, including cash and any equity-based incentive awards for the CEO, and where applicable, in consultation with the CEO, for other senior officers, on an annual basis. The NCG&C Committee Charter is available on the Company’s website at www.rareelementresources.com.

Board Nominating Procedures

The NCG&C Committee believes that candidates for the Board should have (i)  the ability to exercise objectivity and independence in making informed business decisions; (ii)  extensive knowledge, experience and judgment; (iii)  integrity; (iv)  loyalty to the interests of the Company and its shareholders; (v)  a willingness to devote the extensive time necessary to fulfill a director’s duties; (vi)  the ability to contribute to the diversity of perspectives present in board deliberations; and (vii)  an appreciation of the role of the Company in society. The NCG&C Committee considers candidates meeting these criteria who are suggested by directors, management, shareholders, and search firms hired to identify and evaluate qualified candidates.

Table of Contents

Shareholders may submit recommendations in writing by a letter addressed to the CEO of the Company or the Chair of the NCG&C Committee. The NCG&C Committee will carefully consider each shareholder recommendation, evaluating each shareholder-recommended candidate for director under the same standards as candidates identified by any other method.

Gender Diversity on the Board

The NCG&C Committee and the Board do not currently have a formal policy with regard to the consideration of gender diversity in identifying director nominees. While the Board recognizes the benefits of diversity and inclusion at all levels within its organization, it does not currently have any targets, rules or formal policies that specifically require the identification, consideration, nomination or appointment of female board nominees or candidates for executive management positions or that would otherwise force the composition of the Board or the Company’s executive management team. Board nominations and appointments are assessed solely based upon the merits of the candidates, in the context of the skills, experience and independence which the Board requires in order to be effective; however, the

Table of Contents

NCG&C Committee encourages candidate diversity, including gender diversity, in the process of identifying and vetting all candidates. When searching for candidates for senior management positions, the Board focuses on attracting and retaining experienced and highly skilled individuals who can add value to its business, while also encouraging diversity.

Currently, the Company has two female Board members, and one female executive officer. The NCG&C Committee may consider the introduction of a formal policy regarding diversity and inclusion in the future.

Term Limits and Board Composition

The NCG&C Committee and the Board do not currently have a formal policy with regard to director term limits or retirement age in connection with individuals nominated for election as it does not believe that such policies would be in the best interests of the Company. The Company operates in a unique industry, making it difficult to find qualified directors with the appropriate background and experience, and the introduction of a director term limit or retirement policy would impose further difficulty. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the NCG&C Committee annually reviews and makes recommendations regarding the size, composition, operation, practice and tenure policies of the Board, with a view to effective oversight and decision making. The NCG&C Committee believes that when selecting candidates to serve on the Board, it is in the best interests of the Company to consider the diversity of experience of the Board and review candidates who possess a range of skills, expertise, personality, education, background and other qualities for nomination. The Board strives to achieve a balance between the desirability to have a depth of experiences from its members and the need for renewal and new perspectives. The NCG&C Committee assesses the effectiveness of this approach as part of its annual review of its charter.

The NCG&C Committee reviews the size of the Board annually. The Board must have enough directors to carry out its duties efficiently, while presenting a diversity of views and experience. The Board believes that its current size of seven members best serves the Company’s needs.

Pursuant to and subject to the terms and conditions of the Investment Agreement, Synchron has the right to designate three directors for appointment or election to the Board, where the Board is comprised of seven directors following such appointment or election

Compensation Functions

The NCG&C Committee is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations to the Board regarding the Company’s compensation policies and programs as well as salary and benefit levels for individual ~~executives~~executive officers. The Board, in turn, gives final approval on compensation matters. The NCG&C Committee does not and cannot delegate its authority to determine and recommend director and executive officer compensation.

Insider Trading Arrangements and Policies

The Company has adopted an Insider Trading Policy (the “Insider Trading Policy”) governing the purchase, sale, and/or disposition of its securities by Company Insiders (as defined in the Insider Trading Policy) that are reasonably designed to promote compliance with United States federal and Canadian provincial insider trading laws, rules and regulations. The foregoing summary of the Insider Trading Policy does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of the Insider Trading Policy attached hereto as Exhibit 19.1.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following discussion summarizes our compensation program for our named executive officers for the ~~2023~~2024 fiscal year (amounts stated in whole dollars).

Named Executive Officers

“Named Executive Officer” or “NEO” means (a) all individuals who served as CEO of the Company during the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024; (b) each of the two most highly compensated executive officers, or the two most highly compensated individuals acting in a similar capacity, other than the CEO, at the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023; and (c) each individual who would be an NEO under clause (b) above but for the fact that the individual was neither an executive officer of the Company, nor acting in a similar capacity, at the end of that fiscal year.

~~During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, the Company had two NEOs: Brent D. Berg, President and CEO of the Company and Wayne E. Rich, Chief Financial Officer of the Company.~~83

Table of Contents

compensated individuals acting in a similar capacity, other than the CEO, at the end of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024; and (c) each individual who would be an NEO under clause (b) above but for the fact that the individual was neither an executive officer of the Company, nor acting in a similar capacity, at the end of that fiscal year.

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2024, the Company had five NEOs: Kenneth J. Mushinski, President and CEO; Brent D. Berg, Former President and CEO; Kelli C. Kast, Vice President, General Counsel and Chief Administrative Officer and former Interim President and CEO; Wayne E. Rich, Chief Financial Officer; and Jaye T. Pickarts, Chief Operating Officer.

Summary Compensation Table

Set out below is a summary of compensation paid to the Company’s NEOs during the fiscal years ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024 and ~~2022~~2023.


Name and Principal Position	Year		Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		Option Awards(1) ($)		All Other Compensation(2) ($)		Total ($)
Brent D. Berg (3)	2023	$	250,000	$	100,000	$	—	$	7,320	$	357,320
Kenneth J. Mushinski (3)	2024	$	213,333	$	185,000	$	—	$	2,000	$	400,333
President, CEO and Director	~~2022~~	$	~~41,666~~	$	~~60,000~~	$	~~107,725~~	$	~~10,095~~	$	~~219,486~~
Wayne E. Rich (4)	2023	$	240,000	$	65,000	$	43,791	$	—	$	348,791
Brent D. Berg (4)	2024	$	70,359	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	70,359
Chief Financial Officer	2022	$	164,557	$	50,000	$	142,186	$	—	$	356,743
Former President, CEO and Director	2023	$	250,000	$	100,000	$	—	$	7,320	$	357,320
Kelli C Kast (5)	2024	$	282,500	$	100,000	$	—	$	27,750	$	410,250
Vice President, General Counsel and CAO
Wayne E. Rich (6)	2024	$	250,000	$	70,000	$	—	$	—	$	320,000
Chief Financial Officer	2023	$	240,000	$	65,000	$	43,791	$	—	$	348,791
Jaye T. Pickarts (7)	2024	$	334,700	$	12,000	$	—	$	—	$	346,700
Chief Operating Officer

⁽¹⁾ The grant date fair value of option-based awards is determined by using the Black-Scholes option valuation model based on assumptions for the risk-free interest rate, expected dividend yield, expected volatility of the Common Shares, and expected life of the options set forth in Notes 3 and 9 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.

(2) Other compensation includes the reimbursement of a $72,~~320~~000 ~~and~~cell phone allowance for Mr. Mushinski, $107,~~095~~320 in relocation expenses for Mr. Berg and $27,750 in board of director fees for Ms. Kast.

(3) Mr. ~~Berg~~Mushinski was appointed as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company on ~~November~~May 1, ~~2022~~2024. OnDuring ~~January 2,~~ 2024, Mr. ~~Berg~~Mushinski ~~notified~~was ~~the~~paid ~~Company~~a of$60,000 ~~his~~signing ~~decision~~bonus ~~to resign as the President~~ and ~~Chief~~earned ~~Executive~~a ~~Officer of the Company~~$125,000 ~~effective~~discretionary asbonus ofwhich ~~April~~was 2,paid ~~2024,~~in ~~unless~~January ~~sooner terminated by the Company~~2025. ~~On March 14, 2024, the Company and Mr. Berg agreed that such resignations would take effect on March 20, 2024.~~

76(4) Mr. Berg resigned as the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company on March 20, 2024.

⁽⁵⁾

From June 2015 to June 30, 2024, Ms. Kast served as a consultant to Rare Element Resources, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company and from August 23, 2022 to August 20, 2024, Ms. Kast served as a director of the Company. As a director and consultant, Ms. Kast received pay of $27,750 and $127,500, respectively, before her hire as a Company employee. From March 2024 to May 2024, Ms. Kast served as the interim President and CEO of the Company and was appointed as the Vice President, General Counsel and CAO of the Company on July 1, 2024. During 2024, Ms. Kast earned a $20,000 bonus for her work as interim President and CEO of the Company and a $80,000 discretionary bonus which was paid in January 2025.

⁽⁶⁾	Mr. Rich was appointed as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company on March 28, 2022.

Table of Contents

(47) Mr. ~~Rich~~Pickarts was appointed as the Chief ~~Financial~~Operating Officer of the Company on ~~March~~October 281, ~~2022~~2024. Previously, Mr. Pickarts worked as an independent consultant for various mining companies, including Rare Element. During 2024, Mr. Pickarts compensation included $264,200 related to his services as a consultant to the Company and $70,500 as an employee of the Company.

Narrative Discussion of Compensation and Plan-Based Awards

Employment Agreements

The Company has historically maintained employment agreements with its executive officers. The material terms of prior employment agreements have included (a) employment for an indefinite term unless employment is terminated as provided in the agreement; (b) severance arrangements, including upon a change in control; (c) a base salary; and (d) participation in the stock option plans of the Company (as described below), the incentive bonus, and the Company’s benefit plans as are from time to time available to executive officers of the Company.

~~Brent~~Kenneth DJ. ~~Berg~~Mushinski

Mr. ~~Berg~~Mushinski ~~has~~entered ~~had~~into an employment agreement with the Company ~~since~~effective ~~November~~ May 1, ~~2022~~2024 (the “~~Berg~~Mushinski Employment Agreement”). Pursuant to the ~~Berg~~terms of the Mushinski Employment Agreement, (i) Mr. ~~Berg~~Mushinski’s initial annual base salary ~~is $250,000; (ii) Mr. Berg~~ was ~~paid by December 1, 2022 a one-time signing bonus of~~ $60320,000, ~~which~~and ~~had~~is subject to beadjustment ~~repaid~~at to the Company’s ~~if Mr. Berg had terminated his employment for convenience on or before November 1, 2023~~discretion; (~~iii~~ii) Mr. ~~Berg~~Mushinski ~~was reimbursed for up to $20,000 in certain actual, documented relocation expenses; (iv) Mr. Berg~~ will be eligible to receive an annual performance bonus and such long-term incentive awards as may be determined by the Board; and (viii) Mr. ~~Berg~~Mushinski will be eligible to participate in the employee benefit programs, if offered, ofby the Company.

~~Pursuant to the terms of the Berg Employment Agreement~~Additionally, Mr. ~~Berg~~Mushinski is entitled to separation benefits in the event that his employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” ~~(as defined in the Berg Employment Agreement)~~ or by Mr. ~~Berg~~Mushinski for “good reason” (in each case, as defined in the ~~Berg~~Mushinski Employment Agreement) due to certain reasons, including a material change in title or duties, a material reduction in compensation, a material breach of the ~~Berg~~Mushinski Employment Agreement by the Company, or ~~the~~a failure by the Company to maintain reasonable ~~directors~~D&O ~~and officers liability~~ insurance ~~acceptable to the Board~~, in each case which the Company has failed to cure. The severance payment to be received by Mr. ~~Berg~~Mushinski upon termination under the circumstances described above, provided that Mr. Mushinski executes a general release in favor of the Company and has been with the Company for a minimum of two years from the effective date of the Mushinski Employment Agreement, will be equal to one year of Mr. ~~Berg~~Mushinski’s base salary in effect on the date of termination and paid to Mr. ~~Berg~~Mushinski in a lump sum 60 days after the date of such termination~~, provided that Mr~~. ~~Berg~~ ~~has been with the Company for at least two years.~~ In addition, Mr. ~~Berg’s~~Mushinski equity incentive awards will vest asautomatically ofupon ~~the~~such ~~date of~~ termination~~, provided that Mr~~. ~~Berg executes a general release of claims.~~

OnKelli ~~January 2, 2024, Mr~~C. ~~Berg~~ notified the Company of his decision to resign as the President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director of the Company, in each case effective as of April 2, 2024, unless sooner terminated by the Company. On March 14, 2024, the Company and Mr. Berg agreed that such resignations would take effect on March 20, 2024. Also on March 14, 2024, the Company’s Board of Directors appointed (i) Kelli Kast, a current director of the Company, as the interim President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company, in each case effective as of March 20, 2024, and (ii) Kenneth Mushinski as the President and Chief Executive Officer and as a director of the Company, in each case effective as of May 1, 2024.

Ms. Kast entered into an employment agreement with the Company effective July 1, 2024 (the “Kast Employment Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Kast Employment Agreement, (i) Ms. Kast’s initial annual base salary was $310,000 and is subject to adjustment at the Company’s discretion; (ii) Ms. Kast will be eligible to receive an annual performance bonus and such long-term incentive awards as may be determined by the Board; and (iii) Ms. Kast will be eligible to participate in the employee benefit programs, if offered, by the Company.

Additionally, Ms. Kast is entitled to separation benefits in the event that her employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” or by Ms. Kast for “good reason” (in each case, as defined in the Kast Employment Agreement) due to certain reasons, including a material change in title or duties, a material reduction in compensation, a material breach of the Kast Employment Agreement by the Company, or a failure by the Company to maintain reasonable D&O insurance, in each case which the Company has failed to cure. The severance payment to be received by Ms. Kast upon termination under the circumstances described above will be equal to one year of Ms. Kast’s base salary in effect on the date of termination and paid to Ms. Kast in a lump sum 60 days after the date of such termination. In addition, Ms. Kast’s equity incentive awards will vest automatically upon such termination.

Table of Contents

Wayne E. Rich

Mr. Rich has had an employment agreement with the Company since March 28, 2022 (the “Rich Employment Agreement”). Pursuant to the terms of the Rich Employment Agreement, (i) Mr. Rich’s initial annual base salary was $215,000 and is subject to adjustment at the Company’s discretion; (ii) Mr. Rich will be eligible to receive an annual performance bonus and such long-term incentive awards as may be determined by the Board; and (iii) Mr. Rich will be eligible to participate in the employee benefit programs, if offered, by the Company.

Additionally, Mr. Rich is entitled to separation benefits in the event that his employment is terminated by the Company without “cause” or by Mr. Rich for “good reason” (in each case, as defined in the Rich Employment Agreement) due to certain reasons, including a material change in title or duties, a material reduction in compensation, a material geographic relocation, or a material breach of the Rich Employment Agreement by the Company, or a failure by the Company to maintain reasonable D&O insurance, in each case which the Company has failed to cure. The severance payment to be received by Mr. Rich upon termination under the circumstances described above will be equal to one year of Mr. Rich’s base salary in effect on the date of termination and paid to Mr. Rich in a lump sum 60 days after the date of such termination. In addition, Mr. Rich’s equity incentive awards will vest automatically upon such termination.

77Jaye T. Pickarts

~~Table~~On September 26, 2024, the Company and Mr. Pickarts executed an employment offer letter, which provides that (i) his initial annual base salary is $282,000; (ii) he will be eligible to receive an annual incentive plan cash bonus of ~~Contents~~up to 20% of his annual base salary; and (iii) he will be eligible to participate in the employee benefit programs of the Company.

above will be equal to one year of Mr. Rich’s base salary in effect on the date of termination and paid to Mr. Rich in a lump sum 60 days after the date of such termination. In addition, Mr. Rich’s equity incentive awards will vest automatically upon such termination. 

Equity Plan

As of March 1417, ~~2024~~2025, there were 32,~~335~~635,000 and 1,~~270~~020,000 stock options outstanding, respectively, under the 2011 and 2022 Plans, representing approximately 0.97% of the current outstanding Common Shares. The 2011 Plan was terminated effective as of August 23, 2022. Then-existing awards granted under the 2011 Plan will remain outstanding in accordance with their terms, but new equity awards are being granted solely under the 2022 Plan.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

The following table sets forth the outstanding option awards held by the NEOs of the Company as of December 31, ~~2023~~2024.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End


	Option Awards
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable		Option Exercise Price ($)	Option Expiration Date
Brent D. Berg	83,333		166,667	(1)	$ 0.45	11/1/2032
Kelli C. Kast	150,000	(1)	—		$ 0.83	2/13/2025
Wayne E. Rich	62,500		62,500	(2)	$ 0.38	1/4/2033
	225,000		—		$ 2.25	4/13/2031
	41500,~~667~~000		~~83,333~~—	~~(3)~~	$ 1.2042	31/285/2032
	225,000		—		$ 0.38	1/4/2033
Wayne E. Rich	125,000		—		$ 0.38	1/4/2033
	83,333		41,667	(2)	$ 1.20	3/28/2032
Jaye T. Pickarts	25,000		—		$ 2.25	4/13/2031

(1) The option ~~will~~expired ~~vest~~unexercised ~~and become exercisable as follows: 83,333~~ on ~~November~~February 110, ~~2024, and 83,334 on November 1,~~ 2025.

~~(2) The option will vest and become exercisable as follows: 62,500 on January 4, 2024.~~86

(3) The option will vest and become exercisable as follows: 41,666 on March 28, 2024, and 41,667 on March 28, 2025.

Potential Payments upon Termination

Pursuant to the employment agreements with Mr. Berg and Mr. Rich, each NEO is entitled to separation benefits in the event that his employment is or was terminated by the Company without “cause” or by such NEO for “good reason” (in each case, as defined in the applicable employment agreement) due to certain reasons, including a material change in title or duties, a material reduction in compensation, a material geographic relocation, or a material breach of such employment agreement by the Company, in each case which the Company has failed to cure. The separation benefits to be received by such NEO upon termination under the circumstances described above must equal such NEO’s base salary in effect on the date of termination. The separation benefits are not contingent upon any change in control and are to be paid to such NEO in a lump sum 60 days after the date of such termination. In addition, such NEO’s equity incentive awards vest automatically upon such termination.

The table below sets out the estimated payments due to the applicable NEO employed by the Company as of December 31, 2023 on a qualifying termination without cause, assuming termination took place pursuant to such employment agreement:


Name	Base Salary	Total (1)
Brent D. Berg	$0	$0
Wayne E. Rich	$240,000	$240,000

Table of Contents

⁽²⁾	The option will vest and became exercisable on March 28, 2025.

Potential Payments upon Termination

Pursuant to the employment agreements with Mr. Mushinski, Ms. Kast, and Mr. Rich, each NEO is entitled to separation benefits in the event that his or her employment is or was terminated by the Company without “cause” or by such NEO for “good reason” (in each case, as defined in the applicable employment agreement) due to certain reasons, including a material change in title or duties, a material reduction in compensation, a material geographic relocation, or a material breach of such employment agreement by the Company, in each case which the Company has failed to cure. The separation benefits to be received by such NEO upon termination under the circumstances described above must equal such NEO’s base salary in effect on the date of termination. The separation benefits are not contingent upon any change in control and are to be paid to such NEO in a lump sum 60 days after the date of such termination. In addition, such NEO’s equity incentive awards vest automatically upon such termination.

The table below sets out the estimated payments due to the applicable NEO employed by the Company as of December 31, 2024 on a qualifying termination without cause, assuming termination took place pursuant to such employment agreement. Mr. Berg did not receive any separation payments or benefits in connection with his resignation.


Name	Base Salary	Total
Kenneth J. Mushinski	$320,000	$320,000
Kelli C. Kast	$310,000	$310,000
Wayne E. Rich	$250,000	$250,000

Termination payments, if applicable, are made in a lump sum to the applicable NEO upon a qualifying termination.

(1) Mr. Berg’s resignation, announced on January 5, 2024, was not due to a qualifying event and will not result in the payment of any separation benefit.

Director Compensation

Non-employee directors, other than the ~~Chairman~~Board Chair, Audit Committee Chair, Chair of the Nominating, Corporate Governance and Compensation Committee and the Synchron director designees, ~~receive~~were entitled to annual compensation of $1655,~~000~~500 ~~paid~~during ~~pro~~the ~~rata~~fiscal onyear aended ~~quarterly~~December ~~basis.~~31, ~~The~~2024 ~~Chairman~~while ~~receives~~the ~~annual~~Board ~~compensation of $40~~Chair,~~000~~ ~~per~~Audit ~~year.~~Committee ~~The~~Chair, ~~non-Synchron~~and ~~directors~~Chair of the ~~Company~~Nominating, ~~are~~Corporate ~~encouraged~~Governance and Compensation Committee were entitled to ~~hold~~annual ~~Common~~compensation ~~Shares~~of $81,500, ~~thereby~~$67,500 ~~aligning~~and ~~their~~$67,500, ~~interests~~respectively. ~~with~~Each ~~those~~director’s ofcompensation ~~the~~was ~~shareholders~~paid quarterly and on a pro rata basis. The Synchron director designees elected not to receive any director compensation, including stock options.

The following table sets forth information regarding the compensation received by each of the Company’s non-employee directors during the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024:

Director Compensation


	Fees earned ~~($)~~	Option Awards	All other compensation	Total
Name	($)	($)~~(5)~~	($)	($)
Gerald W. Grandey	4081,~~000~~500	~~105,099~~—	—	~~145~~81,~~099~~500
Bart S. Brundage (1)	—	—	—	—
Nicole J. Champine (1)	—	—	—	—
Paul J. Hickey (2)	5,720	17,516	—	23,236
David I. Roberts (1,2)	—	—	—	—
Kelli C. Kast (3)	16,000	—	—	16,000
Craig S. Bartels (1.3)	—	—	—	—
David I. Roberts (1)	—	—	—	—
Pamela L. Saxton (4)	19,972	—	—	19,972
Lowell A. Shonk (4)	17,346	70,066	—	87,412
Paul J. Hickey	55,500	—	—	55,500

(1) Synchron’s director designees on the Board, Ms. Champine and Messrs. Brundage, Roberts and ~~Roberts~~Bartels elected not to receive any director compensation, including stock options.

(2) Mr. ~~Hickey~~Roberts’ ~~was~~term ~~elected~~ as a director of the Company ended on ~~August~~April 224, ~~2023~~2024.

(3) Ms. Kast was elected as a director on August 23, 2022. Ms. Kast is a consultant to Rare Element Resources, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, and was paid $325,000 in consulting fees during fiscal year 2023 in addition to her director’s compensation. In addition, in 2023, Ms. Kast received stock options with a grant date fair value of $78,824 in connection with her service as a consultant to Rare Element Resources, Inc.87

(4) Mr. Shonk’s term as a director of the Company ended on August 22, 2023.

(5) The amounts in this column represent the grant date fair value of option awards determined by using the Black-Scholes option valuation model based on assumptions for the risk-free interest rate, expected dividend yield, expected volatility of the Common Shares, and expected life of the options set forth in Notes 3 and 9 to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report.

Table of Contents

(3)	Mr. Bartels was elected as a director on April 4, 2024.

(4)	Ms. Saxton was elected as a director on August 20, 2024.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Equity Compensation Plan Information

As of December 31, ~~2023~~2024, we had two equity compensation plans under which our common shares had been authorized for issuance to our officers, directors, employees, and non-employee consultants. See “Part II, Item 5. Equity Incentive Plan Information” for additional information relating to our equity compensation plans.

1Security Ownership Table

The following table sets forth certain information regarding beneficial ownership, control, or direction, directly or indirectly, of the Company’s Common Shares, as of March 1517, ~~2024~~2025 by (i) the Company’s named executive officers and directors and (ii) the Company’s current executive officers and directors as a group.


	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership *
Name and Position (1)	Common Shares (2)		Percentage of Class (3)
Gerald W. Grandey – Director and ChairmanSaskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada	5,~~672~~530,~~260~~943	(4)	1.1107%
Kelli C. Kast – Director Evergreen, Colorado, USA	1,100,000	(5)	**
Kelli C. Kast – Vice President, General Counsel and CAO Evergreen, Colorado, USA	950,000	(5)	**
Wayne E. Rich – Chief Financial Officer Highlands Ranch, Colorado, USA	~~208~~250,~~333~~000	(6)	**
Brent D. Berg – President, CEO and Director Wyoming, USA	41,666	(7)	**
Jaye T. Pickarts – Chief Operating Officer Colorado, USA	148,695	(7)	**
Paul J. Hickey – Director Cheyenne, Wyoming, USA	76,000	(8)	**
David I. Roberts – Director Solana Beach, California, USA	Nil	(9)	**
Kenneth J. Mushinski - President, CEO and DirectorTexas, USA	Nil		**
Pamela L. Saxton – Director Littleton, Colorado, USA	Nil		**
Craig S. Bartels – Director Arizona, USA	Nil	(9)	**
Barton S. Brundage – Director Parker, Colorado, USA	Nil	(9)	**
Nicole J. Champine – Director Denver, Colorado, USA	Nil	(9)	**
All executive officers and directors as a group (a total of 8 persons)	7,098,259		1.38%
Brent D. Berg – Former President and CEOWyoming , USA	Nil		**
All executive officers and directors as a group (a total of 10 persons)	6,955,638		1.34%

* Pursuant to Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act, beneficial ownership includes shares as to which the individual has or shares voting power or investment power, and any shares that the individual has the right to acquire within 60 days of March 1517, ~~2024~~2025, including through the exercise of any option, warrant, or right. For each individual who holds options, warrants or rights to acquire Common Shares, the Common Shares underlying those securities are treated as owned by that holder and as outstanding Common Shares when that holder’s percentage ownership of Common Shares is calculated. Those Common Shares are not treated as outstanding when the percentage ownership of any other holder is calculated.

Table of Contents

options, warrants or rights to acquire Common Shares, the Common Shares underlying those securities are treated as owned by that holder and as outstanding Common Shares when that holder’s percentage ownership of Common Shares is calculated. Those Common Shares are not treated as outstanding when the percentage ownership of any other holder is calculated.

**	The percent of class owned is less than 1%.

⁽¹⁾	Mailing address for all directors and executive officers is c/o Rare Element Resources, Ltd., P.O. Box 271049, Littleton, Colorado 80127.

80(2) Includes Common Shares held as of March 17, 2025, plus Common Shares which may be acquired pursuant to the exercise of stock options exercisable within 60 days after March 17, 2025.

~~Table~~(3) In accordance with Rule 13d-3(d)(1) under the Exchange Act, the applicable percentage of ~~Contents~~ownership for each person is based on 516,134,712 Common Shares outstanding as of March 17, 2025.

(24) Includes 4,780,943 Common Shares ~~held~~and ~~as of March 15~~750,000 ~~2024, plus~~ Common Shares ~~which~~subject ~~may be acquired pursuant~~ to ~~the exercise of stock~~ options ~~exercisable~~held ~~within~~by 60Mr. ~~days~~Grandey ~~after March 15, 2024~~personally.

(35) InIncludes ~~accordance with Rule 13d-3(d)(1) under the Exchange Act~~950,000 ~~the applicable percentage of ownership for each person is based on 511,111,557~~ Common Shares ~~outstanding~~subject asto ofoptions ~~March~~held ~~15,~~by ~~2024~~Ms. Kast personally.

(46) Includes 4250,~~772,260~~00 Common Shares ~~and 900,000 Common Shares~~ subject to options held by Mr. ~~Grandey~~Rich personally.

(57) Includes 1123,~~100~~695 Common Shares and 25,000 Common Shares subject to options held by MsMr. ~~Kast~~Pickarts personally.

(6) Includes 208,333 Common Shares subject to options held by Mr. Rich personally.

(7) Includes 41,666 Common Shares subject to options held by Mr. Berg personally.

⁽⁸⁾	Includes 26,000 Common Shares and 50,000 Common Shares subject to options held by Mr. Hickey personally.

(9) Excludes Common Shares owned by Synchron, ~~of which Mr. Roberts is a director, and~~ an affiliate of which each of MrMs. ~~Brundage~~Champine and MsMessrs. ~~Champine~~Bartels isand anBrundage ~~officer~~is employed. Pursuant to and subject to the terms and conditions of an Investment Agreement between the Company and Synchron, Synchron has the right to designate three directors for appointment or election to the Board, where the Board is comprised of seven directors following such appointment. Ms. Champine and Messrs. ~~Brundage~~Bartels and ~~Roberts~~Brundage are the three Synchron designees.

Ownership of Common Shares by Certain Beneficial Owners

The following table sets forth information (as of the date indicated) as to all persons or groups known to the Company to beneficially own, control or direct, directly, or indirectly, 5% or more of the issued and outstanding Common Shares of the Company as of March 1517, ~~2024~~2025:


Name and Address of Beneficial Holder	Common Shares Beneficially Owned (1)	Percentage of Class (2)
Synchron, 3550 General Atomics Court, San Diego, California 92121-1122
General Atomic Technologies Corporation, 3550 General Atomics Court, San Diego, California 92121-1122	360,740,516	7069.5889%
Tenaya Corporation, P.O. Box 910304, San Diego, California, 92191-0304
James N. Blue, 3550 General Atomics Court, San Diego, California 92121-1122

(1) This information is based on a Schedule 13D/A filed on ~~December~~June 2328, ~~2021~~2024 by Synchron, General Atomic Technologies Corporation, ~~and~~ Tenaya Corporation and ~~other~~James ~~information~~N. ~~related to the March 2024 rights offering~~Blue. Synchron has sole voting and dispositive power over the Common Shares listed.

~~(2) Calculated based on 511,111,557 Common Shares outstanding as of March 15, 2024.~~89

Table of Contents

(2)	Calculated based on 516,134,712 Common Shares outstanding as of March 17, 2025.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS; AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Transactions with Related Persons

Cost Share Agreement with General Atomics

On November 30, 2021, the Company and General Atomics, ~~a California corporation and~~ an affiliate of Synchron, ~~(“General~~the ~~Atomics”)~~Company’s majority shareholder, entered into ~~a Cost Share Funding Assumption Agreement (~~the “Cost Share Agreement”) pursuant to which the Company agreed to assume and pay for ~~certain~~the non-federal ~~costs~~share of funds incurred by, ~~General~~and ~~Atomics~~on ~~and~~behalf ~~the~~of, ~~consortium~~General Atomics for the design, construction, and operation of the Demonstration Plant ~~near the Bear Lodge REE Project in Upton, Wyoming~~.

AsOn ~~previously~~May ~~discussed~~16, ~~in January 2021~~2024, the ~~DoE announced that a consortium of companies, which includes the~~ Company, ~~led~~and by General Atomics, anentered ~~affiliate~~into ~~of Synchron, and certain of its affiliates, and LNV,~~ an ~~Ardurra~~extension ~~Group,~~agreement ~~Inc.~~to ~~company, as engineering and construction subcontractor, was selected for a potential financial award in~~ the ~~amount~~Cost ofShare ~~$21.9 million~~Agreement ~~for the engineering, construction and operation of the Demonstration Plant. The DoE award was finalized through a cooperative agreement dated October 1, 2021~~ (the “~~Cooperative~~Extension Agreement”) ~~between~~under ~~General~~which ~~Atomics and~~ the ~~DoE~~Company ~~with~~agreed ~~respect~~ to ~~the~~make ~~engineering,~~additional ~~permitting,~~cash ~~licensing~~advances, ~~construction, and operation of the Demonstration Plant. The Cooperative Agreement provides that~~ up to ~~approximately~~ $~~43.8 million~~2,500, into ~~allowable~~General ~~costs~~Atomics ~~for~~while the ~~Demonstration~~parties ~~Plant~~progressed ~~will~~an beamended ~~funded~~project onfunding aagreement ~~cost-share~~covering ~~basis, 50% by~~ the ~~DoE~~Company’s ~~and~~share ~~50%~~of bythe aadditional non-federal ~~entity~~project funding needed for the project’s completion.

~~Pursuant~~As toof ~~the~~March ~~terms~~21, of2025, an amendment to the Cost Share Agreement, ~~the~~was ~~Company~~in isthe ~~obligated~~process toof ~~make~~being ~~payments~~finalized ~~totalling~~with ~~$21.9 million~~ General Atomics, aswith ~~leader~~completion ofexpected ~~the~~in ~~consortium,~~mid-2025. ~~for~~See ~~its~~Note ~~share~~4 ofto the ~~assumed~~Consolidated ~~costs~~Financial Statements for ~~the~~a ~~Demonstration~~more ~~Plant,~~complete ~~$15.7 million~~discussion of ~~which~~the ~~had~~Cost ~~been~~Share ~~paid through December 31, 2023~~Agreement.

Professional Services Agreement with Ms. Kast

Prior to her employment in July 2024, Ms. Kast ~~is,~~had ~~and has~~ been since June 2015, a consultant of Rare Element Resources, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, and ~~has~~had served as a Board member since August 2022. From July 2012 to May 2015, Ms. Kast served as the Vice President, General Counsel, Chief Administrative Officer, and Corporate Secretary of the Company. On February 17, 2021, Rare Element Resources, Inc. entered into an updated professional services agreement, effective as of March 1, 2021, with Ms. Kast (the “Professional Services Agreement”) that ~~has~~was ~~since~~subsequently ~~been~~ extended on an annual basis and which ~~currently~~was ~~runs~~terminated ~~through~~on ~~December 31~~June 30, 2024, with Ms. Kast’s employment. Pursuant to the Professional Services Agreement, Ms. Kast ~~performs~~performed business consulting and administrative oversight services for Rare Element Resources, Inc., and the Company. The Professional Services Agreement ~~provides~~provided that Ms. Kast ~~shall~~ be paid a monthly retainer and ~~shall~~ be eligible for an annual performance bonus at the discretion of the Board. For the fiscal years ~~2023~~2024 (through her employment date) and ~~2022~~2023, Ms. Kast was paid monthly retainers of $2021,~~208~~250 and $1920,~~250~~208, respectively, and received cash bonuses of $8220,~~500~~000 and $7582,~~000~~500, respectively. Ms. Kast’s ~~monthly~~received ~~retainer~~a ~~was~~second ~~adjusted~~cash tobonus of $2180,~~250~~000 in 2024 following her hiring as a Company employee.

Ms. Kast is also eligible for stock option grants pursuant to the Company’s equity incentive plan and as approved by the Board. On January 4, 2023, ~~and January 5, 2022,~~ Ms. Kast received a stock option ~~grants~~grant of 225,000 ~~and 500,000, respectively,~~ that vested (i) 50% each on July 4, 2023, and January 4, 2024 ~~for the 2023 grant, and (ii) 50% each on July 5, 2022, and January 5, 2023 for the 2022 grant~~.

Table of Contents

Legal and Consulting Arrangements with Mr. Hickey

In June  2022, Mr.  Hickey was retained as a consultant to Rare Element Resources,  Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, and was paid a monthly retainer of $5,000 during fiscal years 2023 and 2022 for business and community relations services. Mr.  Hickey ~~had~~serves ~~previously served~~ as an advisor to affiliates of Synchron, the Company’s majority shareholder, in several capacities, including ~~serving~~ as registered agent in the state of Wyoming. ~~for~~Mr. Hickey’s ~~which~~monthly heretainer ~~receives~~with ~~compensation~~Rare ofElement ~~approximately~~Resources, Inc. was adjusted to $56,000 ~~annually~~in 2024 and remains the same for 2025. Prior to his retirement as a partner of Hickey  & Evans, LLP, he served as counsel to General Atomics (an affiliate of Synchron) and certain of its affiliates for various matters from 1980 through 2022. ~~Mr. Hickey’s monthly retainer was adjusted to $6,000 in 2024.~~

Table of Contents

Mr. Hickey is also eligible for stock option grants pursuant to the Company’s equity incentive plan and as approved by the Board. On January 4, 2023, Mr. Hickey received a stock option grant of 50,000 that vested (i) 50% on July 4, 2023 and (ii) 50% on January 4, 2024.

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

The Company’s written corporate governance policies generally discourage transactions involving a potential conflict of interest. The NCG&C Committee is generally responsible for overseeing compliance with the Company’s corporate governance policies, which require that transactions that could reasonably be considered to present a conflict of interest be reported to the NCG&C Committee. However, the Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing compliance with the Code of Conduct contained in the Company’s corporate governance policies. Specifically, the Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and overseeing any transaction or contract exceeding or likely to exceed $120,000 involving the Company and a related party, including transactions subject to disclosure under Item 404 of Regulation S-K. Generally, in reviewing such transactions, the Audit Committee considers the relevant facts and circumstances available and deemed relevant to each determination.

Except for the Cost Share Agreement with General Atomics, the prior Professional Services Agreement with Ms. Kast and the legal and consulting arrangements with Mr. Hickey referenced above, there are no material interests, direct or indirect, of any of the current directors, executive officers, or any shareholder that beneficially owns, directly or indirectly, more than 5% of the outstanding Common Shares, or immediate family members of such persons, in any transaction since January  1, ~~2022~~2023 or in any proposed transaction in which the amount involved exceeded $120,000.

Director Independence

The Board reviewed and determined independence under National Instrument 58-101 – Disclosure of Corporate Governance Practices (“NI 58-101”) of each current director and director nominee. In making its independence determination, the Board considered the circumstances described below.

~~Based~~The ~~upon~~Board ~~the~~determined ~~positions of Ms.~~that ~~Kast and~~ Mr. ~~Hickey~~Mushinski asis ~~consultants~~not toindependent ~~the~~based ~~Company~~upon ~~and~~his ~~Mr. Berg~~position as an executive officer of the Company~~, the Board determined that they are not independent~~. The Board ~~concluded~~determined that ~~each of~~ Ms. Champine and Messrs. ~~Grandey,~~ Brundage, and ~~Roberts~~Bartels are not independent. Asbased aupon ~~result~~each ofperson’s ~~these~~employment ~~analyses~~with an affiliate of Synchron, the ~~Board~~Company’s ~~has~~majority shareholder. The Board determined that ~~the~~Mr. Hickey ~~seven-member~~is ~~Board~~not isindependent ~~comprised~~based upon his and his former law firm’s work providing legal services to General Atomics (an affiliate of aSynchron) ~~majority~~and certain of ~~independent~~its ~~directors~~affiliates, and his work as ~~required~~a ~~under~~consultant NIto ~~58-101~~a subsidiary of the Company.

The Board has concluded that Mr. Grandey and Ms. Saxton are independent. As a result of these analyses, the Board has determined that the proposed seven-member Board would not be comprised of a majority of independent directors. Notwithstanding the above, the Board will carry out its duties under the stewardship of the independent Chairman of the Board, Mr. Grandey, whose role and responsibilities include overseeing the function and effectiveness of the Board and the exercise of independent supervision over management.

Table of Contents

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Audit, Audit-Related, Tax, and Other Fees

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed or expected to be billed by Haynie (Salt Lake City, UT, PCAOB ID#457), for professional services rendered in connection with the fiscal years ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024 and ~~2022~~2023.


		~~2023~~2024		~~2022~~2023
Audit Fees	$	9094,000	$	7090,000
Audit Related Fees		51,~~500~~495		—5,500
Tax Fees		—		—
All Other Fees		—		—
Total	$	95,~~500~~495	$	7095,~~000~~500

Table of Contents

“Audit Fees” represent fees for the audit of the Company’s annual financial statements and attestation services that are provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

“Audit-Related Fees” represent fees for professional services. For the fiscal years ended December 31, 2024 and 2023, the audit related fees in each year related to the Company’s Form S-1 filing.

“Tax Fees” represent fees for professional services rendered for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning on actual or contemplated transactions.

“All Other Fees” consist of fees for products and services other than the services reported above.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

In accordance with the Audit Committee Charter, the Audit Committee’s responsibilities and powers include pre-approval of permitted non-audit services performed for Rare Element or any of its subsidiaries by the Company’s auditor, subject to any de minimis exception under Section 10A(i)(1)(B) of the Exchange Act any rules promulgated thereunder. Consistent with applicable laws, other than audit, review or attestation services, all other services provided by the Company’s auditor are to be pre-approved by one or more members of the Audit Committee pursuant to authority delegated by the Audit Committee, provided that the Audit Committee is informed of each particular service. All of the engagements and fees discussed above under the heading “Audit, Audit-Related, Tax, and Other Fees” for the fiscal years ended December 31, ~~2023~~2024 and ~~2022~~2023 were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.

Since the commencement of the Company’s most recently completed financial year, the Audit Committee has not made any recommendations to nominate or compensate an external auditor which were not adopted by the Board of the Company.

Table of Contents

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

Documents filed as part of this Annual Report or incorporated by reference:

(1)

The consolidated financial statements are presented in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.”

(2)

Financial Statement Schedules (omitted because they are either not required, not applicable, or the required information is disclosed in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements or related notes).

(3)

Reference is made to the Exhibit Index that follows the signature pages of this report.

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.

8592

Table of Contents

INDEX TO EXHIBITS


ExhibitNumber		Description
3.1		Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.1 to the Company’s Form 20-F filed with the SEC on November 17, 2009)
3.2		Certificate of Name Change (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to the Company’s Form 20-F filed with the SEC on November 17, 2009)
3.3		Articles (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.3 to the Company’s Form 20-FR filed with the SEC on November 17, 2009)
4.1+		Description of Securities
10.1*		Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 20, 2016, by and between Rare Element Resources, Inc. and Whitehall Creek, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 26, 2016)
10.1.1		First Amendment to Asset Purchase Agreement, dated as of October 25, 2021, by and between Rare Element Resources, Inc. and Whitehall Creek, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 27, 2021)
10.2		Investment Agreement, dated October 2, 2017, by and between the Company and Synchron (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 13, 2017)
10.3		Intellectual Property Rights Agreement, dated October 2, 2017, by and between the Company and Synchron (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 13, 2017)
10.4		Cost Share Funding Assumption Agreement entered into on November 30, 2021 by and between General Atomics and Rare Element Resources, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 2, 2021)
10.4.1		Extension to Cost Share Funding Assumption Agreement, dated as of May 16, 2024, by and between General Atomics and Rare Element Resources, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 7, 2024)
10.5		Funding Agreement, dated as of June 6, 2023, by and between Rare Element Resources, Inc. and the Wyoming Energy Authority (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 9, 2023)
10.6*		10% Rolling Stock Option Plan of the Company, as Amended and Restated on April 7, 2020 (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 11, 2020)
10.7*		Rare Element Resources Ltd. 2022 Equity Incentive Plan (Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 9, 2022)
10.8*		Employment Agreement, dated as of October 17, 2022 and effective as of November 1, 2022, by and between Rare Element Resources, Inc. and Brent Berg (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 19, 2022)
10.9*		Employment Agreement, dated as of March 28, 2022, by and between Rare Element Resources, Inc. and Wayne Rich (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 31, 2022)
10.10*		Professional Consulting Agreement, dated as of February 17, 2021, by and between Rare Element Resources, Inc. and Kelli Kast as amended effective January 1, 2022 and January 1, 2023 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 28, 2023)
10.10.1*		Letter Agreement Amendment, dated as of February 3, 2023, to Professional Consulting Agreement, dated as of February 17, 2021, by and between Rare Element Resources, Inc. and Kelli Kast (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 10, 2023)
10.10.2*		Letter Agreement Amendment, dated as of January 18, 2024, to Professional Consulting Agreement, dated as of February 17, 2021, by and between Rare Element Resources, Inc. and Kelli Kast
10.11*		Employment agreement dated as of March 15, 2024, by and between Rare Element Resources, Inc, and Kenneth Mushinski (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 18, 2024)

8693

Table of Contents

19.1+‡		Rare Element Resources Ltd. Insider Trading Policy
10.10.2*		Letter Agreement Amendment, dated as of January 18, 2024, to Professional Consulting Agreement, dated as of February 17, 2021, by and between Rare Element Resources, Inc. and Kelli Kast (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10.2 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 20, 2024)
10.11*		Employment Agreement, dated as of July 1, 2024, by and between Rare Element Resources, Inc. and Kelli Kast (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on July 2, 2024)
10.12*		Employment Agreement, dated as of March 15, 2024, by and between Rare Element Resources, Inc, and Kenneth Mushinski (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 18, 2024)
10.13		Professional Services Agreement, dated as of January 6, 2022, by and between Rare Element Resources, Inc. and Jaye Pickarts (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 2, 2024)
10.13.1		Professional Services Agreement, dated as of January 16, 2023, by and between Rare Element Resources, Inc. and Jaye Pickarts (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 2, 2024)
10.13.2		Offer Letter, dated as of September 26, 2024, by and between Rare Element Resources, Inc. and Jaye Pickarts (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 2, 2024)
10.14*		Form of Indemnity Agreement (Directors and Officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on May 8, 2024)
14.1		Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors, Officers and Employees (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on December 13, 2024)
19.1+		Insider Trading Policy, dated December 11, 2024
21.1		Subsidiaries of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 21.1 to the Company’s Form S-1 filed with the SEC on December 5, 2023)
23.1+		Consent of Registered Public Accounting Firm (Haynie & Company; Salt Lake City, UT; PCAOB ID #457)
23.2+		Consent of Qualified Person (Ore Reserves Engineering)
23.3+		Consent of Qualified Person (Monica Barrero Bouza)
23.4+		Consent of Qualified Person (Jaye T. Pickarts)
31.1+		Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act
31.2+		Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act
32.1++		Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.2++		Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
96.1		Technical Report Summary for the Bear Lodge REE Project, dated as of February 29, 2024 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 96.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on March 4, 2024)
99.1++		Audit Committee Charter, dated as of March 15, 2016 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K/A filed with the SEC on April 27, 2022)
99.1+		Audit Committee Charter, dated as of June 20, 2024
101.INS+		Inline XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document
101.SCH+		XBRL Schema Document
101.CAL+		XBRL Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF+		XBRL Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB+		XBRL Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE+		XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document
104		Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL with applicable taxonomy extension information contained in Exhibits 101)

+ Filed herewith.

++ Furnished herewith.

‡ Certain schedules or similar attachments to this exhibit have been omitted in accordance with Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K. The registrant hereby agrees to furnish supplementally to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request a copy of any omitted schedule or attachment to this exhibit.

* Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD.


By:	/s/ ~~Brent~~Kenneth DJ. ~~Berg~~Mushinski	By	: /s/ Wayne E. Rich
	Brent D. Berg, President, Chief Executive Officer		Wayne E. Rich, Chief Financial Officer
	Kenneth J. Mushinski, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director		Wayne E. Rich, Chief Financial Officer
	and Director		(Principal Financial Officer)
	(Principal Executive Officer)		(Principal Financial Officer)
	(Principal Executive Officer)
	Date: March 21, 2025		Date: March 21, 2025
	Date: March 19, 2024		Date: March 19, 2024

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


By:	/s/ Gerald W. Grandey
	Gerald W. Grandey, Chairman of the Board of Directors
	Date: March 19, 2024
	Date: March 21, 2025

By:	/s/ ~~Brent~~Kenneth DJ. ~~Berg~~Mushinski
	Brent D. Berg, President, CEO and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
	Kenneth J. Mushinski, President, CEO and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
	Date: March 19, 2024
	Date: March 21, 2025

By:	/s/ Barton S. Brundage
	Barton S. Brundage, Director
	Date: March 19, 2024
	Date: March 21, 2025

By:	/s/ Nicole J. Champine
	Nicole J. Champine, Director
	Date: March 1921, ~~2024~~2025

By:	/s/ Paul J. Hickey
	Paul J. Hickey, Director
	Date: March 19, 2024
	Date: March 21, 2025

By:	/s/ ~~Kelli~~Craig CS. ~~Kast~~Bartels
	Kelli C. Kast, Director
	Craig S. Bartels, Director
	Date: March 1921, ~~2024~~2025

By:	/s/ ~~David~~Pamela IL. ~~Roberts~~Saxton
	David I. Roberts, Director
	Pamela L. Saxton, Director
	Date: March 1921, ~~2024~~2025

By:	/s/ Wayne E. Rich
	Wayne E. Rich, CFO (Principal Financial Officer)
	Date: March 1921, ~~2024~~2025

8895

Filing Compare · RARE ELEMENT RESOURCES LTD