UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE

ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE

ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________ to __________

Commission file number 0-53652

Resource Real Estate Investors 6, L.P.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware		37-1548084
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

One Crescent Drive, Suite 203, Navy Yard Corporate Center, Philadelphia, PA 19112

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(215) 231-7050

(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Limited Partnership Units

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.



Large accelerated filer	¨		Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	¨	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)	Smaller reporting company	þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

There is no public market for the Registrant' securities.

Documents Incorporated by Reference: None

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 6, L.P.

INDEX TO ANNUAL REPORT

ON FORM 10-K

			Page
PART I
	Item 1:	Business	4
	Item 1A:	Risk Factors	6
	Item 1B:	Unresolved Staff Comments	6
	Item 2:	Properties	6
	Item 3:	Legal Proceedings	6
	Item 4:	Mine Safety Disclosures	6
PART II
	Item 5:	Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters andIssuer Purchases of Equity Securities	7
	Item 6	Selected Financial Data	7
	Item 7:	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	7
	Item 7A:	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	1213
	Item 8:	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	1314
	Item 9:	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting andFinancial Disclosure	2830
	Item 9A:	Controls and Procedures	2830
	Item 9B:	Other Information	2830
PART III
	Item 10:	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	2931
	Item 11:	Executive Compensation	3032
	Item 12:	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	3133
	Item 13:	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	3133
	Item 14:	Principal Accounting Fees and Services	3335
PART IV
	Item 15:	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	3436
SIGNATURES			3537

(Back to Index)

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (this “Report”) include “forward-looking statements.” Forward-looking statements relate to expectations, beliefs, projections, future plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical facts. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expects,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “project,” “should,” “will” and “would” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology.

Forward-looking statements contained in this report are based on our beliefs, assumptions and expectations for our future performance, taking into account all information currently available to us. These beliefs, assumptions and expectations can change as a result of many possible events or factors, not all of which are known to us or are within our control. If a change occurs, our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations may vary materially from those expressed in our forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements we make in this report are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to vary from our forward-looking statements, including:


•	changes in our industry, interest rates or the general economy;


•	decrease in occupancy rates;


•	increased rates of tenant default;


•	increases in operating expenses at our properties;


•	increases in capital expenditures to maintain or enhance our properties;


•	the timing of cash flows, if any, from our investments and payments for debt service;


•	the degree and nature of the competition in the geographic areas in which our properties are located; and


•	availability and retention of qualified personnel to manage and operate our properties.

We caution you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements which speak only as of the date of this report. All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section. Except to the extent required by applicable law or regulation, we undertake no obligation to update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of this filing or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events.

As used herein, the terms “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to Resource Real Estate Investors 6, L.P.

(Back to Index)

PART I


ITEM 1.	BUSINESS

General

Resource Real Estate Investors 6, L.P. is a Delaware limited partnership which was formed on July 26, 2007 and commenced operations on October 1, 2007. We own in fee, operate and invest in multifamily residential rental properties, which we refer to as the Properties, located in Texas. Historically, we also invested in subordinated notes secured by multifamily residential rental properties located in California and Nevada, which we refer to as Real Estate Debt Investments. We refer to the Properties and Real Estate Debt Investments collectively as Real Estate Investments.

Our general partner, Resource Capital Partners, Inc. ("RCP"), or the General Partner, is in the business of sponsoring and managing real estate investment limited partnerships and tenant in common programs. Our General Partner operates and manages our Real Estate Investments on our behalf, and is responsible for evaluating, managing, refinancing, and selling our Real Estate Investments on our behalf. Our General Partner is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Resource America, Inc. (Resource America, or RAI), a ~~publicly traded~~ company ~~(NASDAQ: REXI)~~ operating in the real estate, financial fund management and commercial finance sectors.

On September 8, 2016, RAI was acquired by C-III Capital Partners LLC ("C-III"), a leading commercial real estate services company engaged in a broad range of activities. C-III indirectly controls RCP and all of the partnership units of the Partnership currently owned by RCP.

Our goals are to generate regular cash distributions from our operations, gains from the potential appreciation in the value of our Properties, and cash for our partners’ distributions from the sale or refinancing of the Properties or the sale or repayment of our Real Estate Debt Investments.

WeOur ~~will~~General ~~terminate~~Partner onhas ~~July~~complete ~~30,~~and ~~2016,~~exclusive ~~unless~~discretion wein ~~are~~the ~~sooner~~management ~~dissolved~~of orour ~~terminated~~business. ~~Our~~On June 29, 2015, by written notice to the partners, the General Partner ~~from~~elected ~~time~~to extend the term for one year to ~~time~~July 30, in2016. ~~its~~On ~~discretion~~May 20, ~~may~~2016, by written notice to the partners, the General Partner elected to extend the term for upone additional year to anJuly ~~aggregate~~30, of2017 ~~two~~to ~~years~~maximize the Partnership's return to its partners. ~~Our~~The ~~General~~Partnership ~~Partner~~ has ~~complete~~begun ~~and~~the ~~exclusive~~process ~~discretion~~of indissolution through the ~~management~~strategic disposal of ~~our business~~assets. On ~~June~~December 291, 2015, bythe ~~written~~Partnership ~~notice~~sold its interest in both Coach Lantern and Foxcroft. Memorial Towers was sold on May 9, 2016. Villas of Henderson Pass was sold on September 26, 2016. The remaining asset, Park Hill, is expected to be disposed of in 2017. If the ~~partners~~Partnership is unable to sell Park Hill before the July 30, 2017 termination date of the Agreement, the General Partner ~~elected~~plans to extend the Partnership's term, ~~for~~which ~~one~~requires ~~year~~majority toconsent ~~July~~of ~~30,~~the ~~2016~~limited partners. ~~Our~~In the event majority consent is not obtained, the General Partner ~~has~~may ~~advised~~dispose usthe ~~that,~~property ~~based~~pursuant ~~upon~~to ~~current~~the ~~conditions~~liquidation provisions of the Agreement. Under those provisions, itshould ~~expects~~the toGeneral ~~elect~~Partner conclude that an immediate sale of Park Hill would cause undue loss to ~~extend~~the ~~our~~partners, ~~term~~the ~~for~~Partnership ~~one~~may ~~additional~~distribute ~~year~~Park Hill to ~~maximize~~a ~~our~~liquidating ~~return~~trust, to ~~our~~facilitate ~~partners.~~an orderly sale of Park Hill.

Our Management

As we do not have any officers, directors or employees, we rely solely on the officers and employees of our General Partner and its affiliates for the management of our Real Estate Investments. Our General Partner and its affiliates, Resource Real Estate Management, LLC and Resource Real Estate, Inc., also conduct business activities of their own in which we have no economic interest. Employees of our General Partner and its affiliates who provide us with services are not required to work full-time on our affairs. These employees devote significant time to the affairs of our General Partner and its affiliates and are compensated by our General Partner and its affiliates for the services rendered to them. There may be significant conflicts between us and our General Partner and its affiliates regarding the availability of those employees to manage us and our Real Estate Investments.

Real Estate Manager

Resource Real Estate Management, LLC, or Resource Real Estate Management, a wholly owned subsidiary of our General Partner, manages or supervises the management of our Real Estate Investments under a real estate management agreement with us or our subsidiary holding legal title to a particular Real Estate Investment. Resource Real Estate Management is a Delaware limited liability company that was formed in 2005 for the purpose of managing the real estate investments of our General Partner and its affiliates either for their own account or for other real estate programs. ~~In October 2007,~~ Resource Real Estate Management, Inc., d/b/a Resource Residential, is a subsidiary of US Residential Group LLC ("USRG"), a Dallas-based property manager that is a wholly owned subsidiary of ~~Resource America~~C-III, ~~was~~and ~~formed~~manages toour ~~manage~~ residential real estate investments for Resource Real Estate Management. For a discussion of the management fee payable under these arrangements, see Item 13.

Distribution Allocations

Distributable cash, which includes both distributable cash from operations as well as from capital transactions, will be distributed as described below.

(Back to Index)

Distributable cash, which includes both distributable cash from operations ~~will~~as bewell ~~distributed~~as infrom ~~the~~capital ~~following~~transactions, ~~order~~will ofbe ~~priority:~~distributed as described below.

Distributable cash from operations is distributed in the following order of priority:


•	first, 100% to the limited partners until they have each received distributions from us, including distributions of distributable cash from capital transactions, equal to their respective preferred return of 8.25% if they subscribed for their units on or before December 31, 2007 or 8% if they subscribed for their units after December 31, 2007, which we refer to as their Preferred Return; and


•	thereafter, 80% to the limited partners and 20% to our General Partner.

Distributable cash from capital transactions, which includes cash received from the sale or refinancing of a Property, or the sale or repayment in full of all outstanding principal and interest due and owing to us on a Real Estate Debt Investment, ~~will~~is be distributed in the following order of priority:


•	first, 100% to our limited partners until they have each received distributions from us, including distributions of distributable cash from operations, equal to their respective Preferred Return;


•	second, 100% to our limited partners until their respective adjusted capital contribution has been reduced to zero; and


•	thereafter, 80% to our limited partners and 20% to our General Partner.

An adjusted capital contribution is the amount originally paid for the limited partnership interest, less previous distributions of distributable cash from capital transactions.

Redemption of Units

We are permitted, in our General Partner’s sole discretion, to redeem units upon a unitholder’s request. However, we have no obligation to redeem units at any time, and we can decline to redeem units for any reason. For example, if our General Partner determines that we do not have the necessary cash flow, taking into account future distributions to our other limited partners, investments, and foreseeable operating expenses, a unitholder’s request may be declined. In addition, our General Partner may not approve the redemption of units if it concludes that the redemption might cause our total unit transfers in the year, subject to certain exceptions, to exceed 2% of our total capital or profits interests. All of these determinations are subjective and will be made in our General Partner’s sole discretion. We will also determine the redemption price based on provisions set forth in the First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership, or the Partnership Agreement. To the extent the formula for arriving at the redemption price has any subjective determinations, they will fall within the sole discretion of our General Partner. If we lack the requisite liquidity to redeem the units, our General Partner, in its sole discretion, may purchase the units on generally the same terms as we would have redeemed the units. As of the date of this Report, 11,602 units have been redeemed for an average redemption price of $7.65 per unit. During the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, we did not receive any redemption requests.

Sale of Units

From October 1, 2007 through May 19, 2008, we privately sold our limited partnership units at $10.00 per unit to accredited investors, as that term is defined in Rule 501(a) of Regulation D of the Securities Act. We sold a total of 3,713,492 units, including 204,678 units to our General Partner, for total proceeds, before commissions, fees and expenses, of approximately $36.8 million. We refer to these sales as the Offering. Resource Securities, Inc., an affiliate of our General Partner, served as the dealer-manager in the Offering.

Available Information

We file annual, quarterly and current reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC. The public may read and copy any materials we file with the SEC at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The internet address of the SEC site is http://www.sec.gov.

(Back to Index)


ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS

Omitted as permitted under rules applicable to smaller reporting companies.


ITEM 1B.	UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Omitted as permitted under rules applicable to smaller reporting companies.


ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES

See Item 7 - “Overview.”


ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

WeNot ~~are a party to various routine legal proceedings arising out of the ordinary course of our business~~applicable. ~~Management believes that none of these actions, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.~~

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY PROPERTIES

Not applicable.

(Back to Index)

PART II


ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUTY SECURITIES

Our limited ~~partner~~partnership units are not publicly traded. There is no established market for our limited ~~partner~~partnership units and it is unlikely that any will develop. As of ~~March~~December 2931, 2016, there were 576 holders of record of our limited ~~partner~~partnership units.

We pay distributions monthly. No distributions were paid to the General Partner for either ~~2015~~2016 or ~~2014~~2015, except for distributions on the limited ~~partner~~partnership units it owns. Total distributions paid to limited partners for those years were $1315.27 million and $113.12 million, respectively. The following table details these distributions by month:

December 31, 2015

December 31, 2014

December 31, 2016

December 31, 2015

Distributions

Per Unit

Distributions

Per Unit

January

9365,~~112~~142

0.~~025~~018

9293,~~700~~112

0.025

February

9365,~~112~~142

0.~~025~~018

9293,~~700~~112

0.025

March

9365,~~113~~142

0.~~025~~018

9293,~~700~~113

0.025

April

9365,~~113~~142

0.~~025~~018

9293,~~700~~113

0.025

May

937,~~113~~548,956

02.~~025~~039

9293,~~700~~113

0.025

June

9348,~~113~~900

0.~~025~~013

93,~~100~~113

0.025

July

9348,~~113~~900

0.~~025~~013

93,~~100~~113

0.025

August

9348,~~113~~900

0.~~025~~013

93,~~100~~113

0.025

September

9348,~~113~~900

0.~~025~~013

93,~~100~~113

0.025

October

937,~~113~~525,614

02.~~025~~033

93,~~100~~113

0.025

November

9394,~~113~~883

0.~~025~~026

93,~~100~~113

0.025

December

1225,~~193,664~~731

30.~~294~~007

9312,~~100~~193,664

03.~~025~~294

Total distributions for the year

1315,~~217~~651,~~905~~352

34.~~569~~229

113,~~115~~217,~~200~~905

03.~~300~~569

We do not have any equity compensation plans.


ITEM 6.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Selected financial data ~~have~~has been omitted as permitted under rules applicable to smaller reporting companies.


ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion relates to our financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Report. Statements contained in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” that are not historical facts may be forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, which could cause actual results to materially differ from those projected. See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”

Overview

We are a Delaware limited partnership that was formed on July 26, 2007 and commenced operations on October 1, 2007. Through our wholly owned subsidiaries, we own in fee, operate and invest in multifamily residential rental properties ~~located in Texas~~. ~~Historically,~~We we also invested through a wholly owned subsidiary in subordinated notes secured by multifamily residential rental properties ~~located in California and Nevada~~.

As of December 31, 2016, we own one remaining multifamily residential rental property through our 100% owned subsidiary, as follows:

(Back to Index)

As of December 31, 2015, we own three multifamily residential rental properties through our 100% owned subsidiaries, as follows:



Subsidiary / Property	Purchase Date	Leverage Ratio ⁽¹⁾	Number of Units	Property Location
RRE Memorial Towers Holdings, LLC, or Memorial Towers	12/18/2007	—	—	⁽²⁾
RRE Villas Holdings, LLC, or Villas	12/27/2007	—	—	⁽³⁾
RRE Coach Lantern Holdings, LLC, or Coach Lantern	1/29/2008	—	—	⁽⁴⁾
RRE Foxcroft Holdings, LLC, or Foxcroft	1/29/2008	—	—	⁽⁴⁾
RRE Park Hill Holdings, LLC, or Park Hill	2/29/2008	56%	288	San Antonio, Texas
Total			288

_______________

Subsidiary / Property	Purchase Date	Leverage Ratio (1)	Number of Units	PropertyLocation
RRE Memorial Towers Holdings, LLC, or Memorial Towers	12/18/2007	63%	112	Houston, Texas
RRE Villas Holdings, LLC, or Villas	12/27/2007	67%	228	San Antonio, Texas
RRE Coach Lantern Holdings, LLC, or Coach Lantern	1/29/2008	—	—	(2)
RRE Foxcroft Holdings, LLC, or Foxcroft	1/29/2008	—	—	(2)
RRE Park Hill Holdings, LLC, or Park Hill	2/29/2008	56%	288	San Antonio, Texas
Total			628

(1) Face value of mortgage divided by the original total property capitalization, including original reserves, escrows, fees and closing costs.

(2) ~~Foxcroft~~Memorial ~~and~~Towers ~~Coach~~was ~~Lantern were~~ sold on ~~December~~May 19, ~~2015~~2016.

~~The~~(3) Villas ~~following~~was ~~table~~sold ~~sets~~on ~~forth~~September ~~operating~~26, ~~statistics about our multifamily residential rental properties~~2016. ~~This~~ ~~table does not include information with respect to two properties, Foxcroft and Coach Lantern, that were sold in 2015:~~

	AverageOccupancy Rate (1)				Average Effective Rentper Square Foot (2)				Ratio of OperatingExpense to Revenue (3)
	Year EndedDecember 31,				Year EndedDecember 31,				Year EndedDecember 31,
Property	2015		2014		2015		2014		2015		2014
Memorial Towers	95.8	%	94.8	%	$	1.38	$	1.36	61	%	67	%
Villas	95.5	%	90.3	%	$	1.00	$	0.92	57	%	64	%
Park Hill	92.0	%	92.9	%	$	0.92	$	0.94	69	%	64	%

(4) Coach Lantern and Foxcroft were sold on December 1, 2015, and the subsidiaries were dissolved on August 29, 2016.

The following table sets forth operating statistics about our one multifamily residential rental property. This table does not include information with respect to four properties, Memorial Towers, Villas, Foxcroft and Coach Lantern, that were sold prior to December 31, 2016:



	Average Occupancy Rate ⁽¹⁾				Average Effective Rent per Square Foot ⁽²⁾				Ratio of Operating Expense to Revenue ⁽³⁾
	Year Ended December 31,				Year Ended December 31,				Year Ended December 31,
Property	2016		2015		2016		2015		2016		2015
Park Hill	93.1	%	92.0	%	$	0.95	$	0.92	67	%	69	%

_______________


(1)	Number of occupied units divided by total units adjusted for any unrentable units; average calculated on a weekly basis.

(2) Average monthly rental revenue divided by total rentable square footage. We calculate average rental revenue by dividing gross rental revenue by the number of months in a period.


(3)	Includes rental operating expenses and general and administrative expenses as a percentage of rental income.

We ~~also~~purchased ~~own~~ two subordinated notes, Acacia Park and Southern Cove (collectively referred to as "B notes"), in the year ended December 31, 2007, through our wholly owned subsidiary, RRE Funding II, LLC, or Funding, which was formed to hold title to our Real Estate Debt ~~Investments~~Investment. We currently own one non-performing subordinated note as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, as follows (in thousands, except units and percentages):

Real Estate Debt Investment	Face Value of Note		Carrying Value of Note		Stated Interest Rate		Number of Units	Location
Acacia Park, or Acacia	$	2,000	$	—	10.27	%	304	San Bernardino, California
Southern Cove	$	500	$	—	12.75	%	100	Las Vegas, Nevada

~~During~~Funding previously owned the non-performing subordinated note, Acacia Park ("Acacia"), which was resolved in July 2016 and had a face value of $2 million. The B notes went into default in 2009; during the year ended December 31, 2012, the notes were deemed uncollectible and charged off. The senior note to which Acacia was subordinated was partially paid off via refinance in July 2016. The refinancing proceeds were not sufficient for Funding to recover any portion of its note. Due to the refinancing, the Partnership no longer owns the note, and RCP no longer manages the investment.

Results of Operations

We generate our income from the net revenues we receive from our Properties. We also may in the future, generate funds from the sale or refinancing of our Properties. WeAlthough ~~expect~~unlikely, ~~that~~the wesale ~~may sell~~ or ~~refinance~~repayment ~~some~~ of our ~~Properties~~Real ~~during~~Estate ~~the~~Debt ~~next~~Investment ~~year. Should~~may ~~economic~~also ~~conditions~~generate infunds. ~~the~~We ~~areas~~expect inthat ~~which~~we ~~our~~will ~~Properties~~sell ~~are~~the ~~located~~remaining ~~deteriorate~~property, wePark ~~could~~Hill, ~~experience~~within ~~lower~~the ~~occupancy,~~next ~~lower~~fiscal ~~rental~~year ~~revenues~~as ~~and~~the ~~higher~~Partnership ~~operating~~winds ~~costs,~~down. We ~~all~~sold ofMemorial ~~which~~Towers ~~could~~on ~~harm~~May ~~our~~9, ~~operations~~2016, and ~~financial~~Villas ~~condition~~on September 26, ~~reduce~~2016. Should economic conditions in the ~~value~~area ofin ~~our~~which ~~Properties~~the ~~and~~Property ~~limit~~is orlocated ~~eliminate~~deteriorate, ~~our~~we ~~ability~~could toexperience ~~make~~lower ~~distributions~~occupancy, tolower ~~our~~rental ~~limited~~revenues ~~partners.~~and higher operating

(Back to Index)

costs, all of which could harm our operations and financial condition, reduce the value of our Property and limit or eliminate our ability to make distributions to our limited partners.

Our operating results and cash flows from our Properties are affected by four principal factors:


Ÿ	occupancy and rental rates,


Ÿ	property operating expenses,


Ÿ	interest rates on the related financing, and


Ÿ	capital expenditures.

The amount of rental revenues from our Properties depends upon their occupancy rates, rental rates, and concessions granted. We seek to maximize our occupancy rates through aggressive property-level programs, in particular, our Lease Rent Optimizer, or LRO, program which includes rent concessions and a ~~substantial~~ capital improvements program. Under our LRO program, we seek to price our rents for apartment units on a daily basis, based upon inventory in the marketplace and competitors’ pricing. Our ~~Properties~~Property experienced an overall increase in the average occupancy rate during the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 of approximately 1.21% with an average occupancy rate of 9593.31% as compared to an average occupancy rate of 9492.10% during the same period in ~~2014~~2015. Our ~~Properties~~Property experienced an increase in the average effective rent per square foot of $0.0103 during the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 compared to the same period in ~~2014~~2015 for the same ~~properties~~property.

We seek to control operating expenses through our General Partner’s automated purchase order system that compares actual to budgeted expenses and requires management approval of variances, and through the use of third-party service providers to seek best available pricing.

~~Financing~~Our existing financing is at a fixed ~~rates~~rate of interest and, accordingly, our interest cost has remained stable during the period of our ownership of the Properties. Because our existing financing extends through ~~periods ranging from 2017 to~~ 2018, we expect that our financing costs will remain stable during ~~fiscal~~2017. However, ~~2016~~we intend to market Park Hill in order to sell it prior to the Partnership termination date in 2017.

Under our capital improvements program, more particularly described in “Liquidity and Capital Resources,” we could potentially spend approximately $768,000 during the remainder of the Partnership term for property improvements intended to increase the Properties’ appeal to tenants and potential purchasers. As we implement planned improvements to our Properties, we seek to maintain our occupancy rates and, potentially, increase rental rates to ensure that we maximize the return to our Partners.

Year Ended December 31, 2015 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2014

The following table sets forth the results of our operations for the periods indicated (in thousands, except per unit data):

	December 31,						Increase (Decrease)
	2015			2014			Amount			Percent
Revenues:
Rental income	$	10,116		$	9,854		$	262		3	%
Expenses:
Rental operating	4,949			5,257			(308		)	(6	)%
Management fees – related parties	880			872			8			1	%
General and administrative	507			516			(9		)	(2	)%
Depreciation and amortization	2,235			2,532			(297		)	(12	)%
Total expenses	8,571			9,177			(606		)	(7	)%
Income before other expenses	1,545			677			868			128	%
Other income (expense):
Interest expense, net	(2,100		)	(2,600		)	500			19	%
Gain on sale of rental properties	13,126			—			13,126			100	%
Loss on disposal of fixed assets, net	(19		)	(44		)	25			(57	)%
Total other income (expense)	$	11,007		$	(2,644	)	13,651			(516	)%
Net Income (loss)	$	12,552		$	(1,967	)	$	14,519		(738	)%
Weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding	3,702			3,702
Net income (loss) per weighted average limited partner unit	$	3.39		$	(0.53	)

Revenues

(Back to Index)

WeYear ~~attribute~~Ended ~~the $262~~December 31,~~000~~ ~~increase~~2016 inCompared ~~revenues primarily~~ to ~~the~~Year ~~increase~~Ended in average occupancy rate. We were able to increase rents as a result of stable occupancy and strong market demand. Average effective rent per square foot has remained consistent during the year ended December 31, 2015 ~~compared to the same period in 2014 for the same properties.~~

The following table sets forth the results of our operations for the periods indicated (in thousands, except per unit data):



	Year Ended December 31, 2016									Year Ended December 31, 2015
	Park Hill			All other			Total			Park Hill			All other			Total
REVENUES
Rental income and other income	$	2,666		$	2,501		$	5,167		$	2,568		$	7,548		$	10,116

OPERATING EXPENSES
Insurance	83			113			196			71			248			319
Real estate taxes	448			405			853			425			867			1,292
Operating expenses	1,115			944			2,059			1,139			2,199			3,338
Management fees- related party	130			313			443			127			753			880
General and administrative	132			453			585			132			375			507
Depreciation and amortization	614			265			879			623			1,612			2,235
Total operating expenses	2,522			2,493			5,015			2,517			6,054			8,571
NET OPERATING INCOME (LOSS)	144			8			152			51			1,494			1,545

Interest expense, net	(563		)	(691		)	(1,254		)	(572		)	(1,528		)	(2,100		)
Gain on sale of rental properties, net	—			17,435			17,435			—			13,126			13,126
Loss on disposal of fixed assets	(16		)	(3		)	(19		)	(11		)	(8		)	(19		)
Loss on extinguishment of debt	—			(226		)	(226		)	—			—			—
Total other income (expense)	(579		)	16,515			15,936			(583		)	11,590			11,007

NET INCOME (LOSS)	$	(435	)	$	16,523		$	16,088		$	(532	)	$	13,084		$	12,552

Revenues

We attribute the $4.9 million decrease in revenues primarily to the sales of Memorial Towers and Villas during the year ended 2016 and of Coach Lantern and Foxcroft during 2015. For Park Hill, revenue increased $98,000 due to an increase in average occupancy rate as well as average effective rent. Average effective rent per square foot has increased by $0.03 during the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 for the same property.

Expenses

We attribute the $~~606,000~~3.6 million decrease in expenses ~~across all properties~~ principally to:

Ÿ a $~~308,000~~1.8 million decrease in rental operating expenses principally reflecting the following:

– a $~~254,000~~1.3 million decrease in operating expenses related to athe ~~decrease~~sale inof ~~utilities~~properties. ~~and~~Park ~~salary~~Hill ~~expenses~~experienced as a ~~result~~$24,000 ofincrease ~~the~~due ~~sale~~to ofincreased ~~rental properties~~occupancy;

– a $~~122~~123,000 overall decrease in insurance expense asdue ato ~~result~~the sale of ~~Property~~properties. ~~losses~~Park ~~incurred~~Hill's ininsurance ~~the~~expense ~~prior~~increased ~~year~~$12,000 ~~for~~due ~~which~~to wean ~~were~~increased ~~self-insured,~~allocation ~~and~~of noself insurance losses ~~incurred~~due into ~~2015;~~the ~~offset~~sale byof Properties across the RAI managed portfolio;

– a $68439,000 ~~increase~~decrease in real estate ~~taxes~~tax expense due to the sale of properties during the year offset by Park Hill's $23,000 increase due to an increased ~~millage~~tax ~~rates~~appraisal;

Ÿ a $9437,000 decrease in ~~general~~management ~~and~~fees ~~administrative expenses~~ due ~~primarily~~ to athe ~~decrease~~sale inof ~~professional fees; and~~properties.

Ÿ• a $~~297~~78,000 ~~decrease~~increase in ~~depreciation~~general and ~~amortization~~administrative expenses due primarily to ~~the~~an ~~disposal~~increase ofin ~~assets~~franchise ~~and~~tax ~~sale~~expense ofas ~~the~~well ~~two~~as ~~Properties.~~audit fees; and


Ÿ	a $1.4 million decrease in depreciation and amortization due to the disposal of assets and sale of properties.

Other income (expense)

The 14$4.9 million increase in other income (expense) is primarily due to the ~~sale~~sales of ~~Foxcroft~~Memorial Towers and ~~Coach~~Villas ~~Lantern. Other~~as ~~income~~well ~~also~~as ~~increased due to~~ a $~~500~~846,000 decrease in net interest expense as a result of ~~principal~~property ~~amortization~~sales, ~~and~~offset ain part by $25226,000 ~~decrease~~ in ~~loss~~defeasance onfees ~~disposal~~incurred ofas ~~fixed~~a ~~assets~~result ~~due~~of tothe ~~higher~~prepayment ~~losses~~of ~~during~~ the ~~prior~~mortgages ~~year~~ for ~~carpeting~~both ~~and~~Memorial ~~flooring~~Towers ~~whose~~and ~~actual~~Villas ~~life~~of ~~was less than the originally estimated economic life~~Henderson.

(Back to Index)

Gain on sale of rental properties included in other income (expense) increased by $4.3 million. The following table presents details of our disposition activity during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):



Multifamily Community	Location	Sale Date	Contract Sales Price		2016 Gain on Sale
2016 Dispositions
Memorial Towers	Houston, Texas	5/9/2016	$	18,000	$	9,739
Villas	San Antonio, Texas	9/26/2016	$	18,000	7,683
					$	17,422

2015 Dispositions					2016 Gain on Sale		2015 Gain on Sale
Foxcroft	Scarborough, Maine	12/1/2015	$	15,200	$	1	$	5,291
Coach Lantern	Scarborough, Maine	12/1/2015	$	16,750	12		7,835
					$	13	$	13,126

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The following table sets forth our net sources and uses of cash (in thousands):

	Years Ended
	December 31,
	2015			2014
	2016			2015
Net cash provided by operating activities (1)	$	1,991		$	1,685
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities (1)	$	(3,319	)	$	1,991
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	14,402			(320		)
Net cash provided by investing activities	17,471			14,402
Net cash used in financing activities	(1315,~~634~~869		)	(113,~~510~~634		)
Net increase (decrease) in cash	$	2,759		$	(145	)
Net (decrease) increase in cash	$	(1,717	)	$	2,759

_______________


(1)	Including changes in operating assets and liabilities.

Our liquidity needs consist principally of funds to pay ~~the Properties’~~ debt service, required escrow payments, operating expenses, capital expenditures and monthly distributions to the limited partners. ~~Our~~ Historically, our ability to meet our liquidity needs ~~will~~has bebeen subject to our ability to generate cash from both operations and sales, and to control property operating expenses. However, as a result of the sales of Foxcroft and Coach Lantern, we have generated enough funds to cover operating expenses, capital expenditures and monthly distributions. Moreover, as a result of the sale of Memorial Towers, we have generated enough funds to distribute the limited partner's preferred return as well as the subordinated investment management fees owed. The sale of Villas on September 26, 2016 generated enough funds to distribute the limited partner's additional preferred return. Excess cash is held for any unforeseen expenses in addition to debt service, operating expenses, capital expenditures and monthly distributions to the limited partners. Although our property sales have generated significant current liquidity, we still seek to generate positive cash from operations. The ability to continue to generate cash from operations will depend on the occupancy rates, rates charged to tenants compared with competing properties in the area and the ability of tenants to pay rent. Occupancy rates can fluctuate based on changes in local market conditions in San Antonio, Texas, where the ~~Properties~~remaining ~~are~~property, Park Hill, is located such as: excessive building resulting in an oversupply of similar properties, deterioration of surrounding areas, a decrease in market rates or local economic conditions including unemployment rates. The rental rates charged to tenants compared to competing properties can be impacted by a lack of perceived safety, convenience and attractiveness of a property.

Under our capital improvements program, we ~~could~~review ~~potentially~~future ~~spend~~possible ~~approximately~~expenditures ~~$768,000~~periodically ~~during~~and ~~the~~adjust ~~remaining~~them ~~partnership~~based ~~term~~on both operating results and local market conditions. If market conditions improve, asand we ~~expect~~believe itwe iscan ~~extended~~achieve an acceptable return on the additional expenditures, ~~for~~we will consider property improvements ~~intended~~ to increase the ~~Properties’~~property's appeal to tenants and potential purchasers and to the extent possible, increase the value of the ~~Properties~~remaining property, Park Hill. As of December 31, 2016, we ~~implement~~have ~~planned~~no plans for significant capital improvements. To the extent that we implement improvements to ~~our~~the ~~Properties~~property, we will seek to maintain our stable occupancy rates and, potentially, increase rental rates and our cash flow from operating activities in order to pay for these improvements.

The following table sets forth the capital expenditures incurred during the year ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 ~~and estimated future capital expenditures which are discretionary in nature~~ (in thousands):

(Back to Index)

1011

Subsidiaries	Capital Expenditures		~~Future Discretionary Capital Expenditures~~
Memorial Towers	$	6810	$	37
Villas	~~104~~38		~~358~~
Coach Lantern	44		—
Park Hill	73
Foxcroft	57		—
Total	$	121
Park Hill	164		373
Total	$	437	$	768

Funding for future additional discretionary capital expenditures, if any, over the remaining life of the Partnership will come from future operating cash flows. We have planned a series of capital projects for our Properties, such as repairs and renovations to the HVAC systems, parking improvements, and foundation work. We review future expenditures periodically and adjust them based on both operating results, local market conditions and our expected return on the investment of capital. We cannot assure you that we will complete projects currently planned or that we will not change our plans in response to changes in market conditions.

Our restricted cash represents escrow deposits with lenders to be used to pay real estate taxes, insurance and capital improvements.

Our payables to related parties consist of investment, debt and property management fees due to our General Partner, payable monthly, equal to 1% of the gross offering proceeds ~~that have been deployed in real estate investments~~, net of any limited partnership ~~interest~~interests owned by the General Partner. The General Partner must subordinate up to 100% of its annual investment management fee to the receipt by the limited partners of their Preferred Return. The ~~limited~~Partnership ~~partners~~used ~~have~~proceeds ~~not~~of ~~received~~both ~~their~~the ~~Preferred~~sale ~~Return~~of ~~over~~Memorial ~~the~~Towers ~~seven~~and ~~years~~Villas to provide the ~~Partnership~~limited ~~has~~partners ~~been~~their ~~operating~~Preferred ~~and~~Return. weThe doremaining ~~not~~proceeds ~~anticipate~~were ~~they~~used ~~will~~to ~~receive~~pay ~~the~~any ~~return~~accrued ininvestment ~~2016~~management fees due to RCP.

~~During~~As ~~2013 we began to make principal payments with respect to three~~ of December 31, ~~the~~2016 ~~mortgage loans on~~ the ~~Properties. The~~ aggregate debt service requirement for ~~all~~the ~~our~~Park ~~loans~~Hill ~~for~~mortgage ~~2016~~over the next 12 months is $1676,000.9 ~~million,~~This ~~including~~includes principal payments of $~~435~~176,000. In ~~addition,~~Future toescrow ~~annual principal~~ payments onof ~~the~~approximately ~~mortgage notes payable~~$667,000 ~~total~~are ~~aggregate~~to ~~required~~be ~~escrow~~paid ~~payments~~over ~~are~~the ~~$1.6~~next ~~million~~12 ~~through March 1, 2018~~months.

Redemption of Units

We are permitted, in our General Partner’s sole discretion, to redeem units upon a unitholder’s request. However, we have no obligation to redeem units at any time, and we can decline to redeem units for any reason. See Item 1, "Redemption of Units." As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, we have redeemed 11,602 units at an aggregate redemption price of $88,784. During the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, we did not receive any redemption requests.

Legal Proceedings

We are a party to various routine legal proceedings arising out of the ordinary course of our business. Management believes that none of these actions, individually or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or GAAP. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of our assets, liabilities, revenues and cost and expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to certain accrued liabilities. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We have identified the following policies as critical to our business operations and the understanding of our results of operations.

Property Acquisitions. We allocated the purchase price of acquired properties to the acquired tangible assets and liabilities, consisting of land, building, tenant improvements, long-term debt and identified intangible assets and liabilities, consisting of the value of above-market and below-market leases, the value of in-place leases, the value of unamortized lease origination costs and the value of tenant relationships, based in each case on their relative fair values. We amortized the value of in-place leases over twelve months on a straight line basis.

Impairment. We review the carrying value of each Property to determine if circumstances that indicate impairment in the carrying value of the investment exist or that depreciation periods should be modified. If we determine that an asset’s estimated future cash flows will not be sufficient to recover its carrying amount, we will record an impairment charge to reduce the carrying amount for that asset to its estimated fair value. No impairment charges were recorded in either 2015 or 2016.

(Back to Index)

1112

agreement. When a loan is impaired, the ~~value~~allowance for loan losses is increased by the amount of ~~tenant~~the ~~relationships,~~excess ~~based~~of inthe ~~each~~amortized ~~case~~cost onbasis ~~their~~of ~~relative~~the loan over its fair ~~values~~value. WeFair ~~amortized~~value may be determined based on market price, if available, the fair value of ~~in-place~~the ~~leases~~collateral ~~over~~less ~~twelve~~estimated ~~months~~disposition oncosts, aor ~~straight~~the ~~line~~present ~~basis.~~value of estimated cash flows.

Loans Held for Investment. We consider a loan to be impaired when, based on current information and events, management believes it is probable that we will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. When a loan is impaired, the allowance for loan losses is increased by the amount of the excess of the amortized cost basis of the loan over its fair value. Fair value may be determined based on market price, if available, the fair value of the collateral less estimated disposition costs, or the present value of estimated cash flows.

We consider general and local economic conditions, neighborhood values, competitive overbuilding, casualty losses and other factors that may affect the underlying value of real estate when considering whether our Real Estate Debt Investments are impaired. The value of our Real Estate Debt Investments may also be affected by factors such as the cost of compliance with regulations and liability under applicable environmental laws, changes in interest rates and the availability of financing. Income from a property will be reduced if a significant number of tenants are unable to pay rent or if available space cannot be rented on favorable terms. In addition, we continuously monitor collections and payments from our borrowers and maintain an allowance for estimated losses based upon our historical experience and knowledge of specific borrower collection issues.

Revenue Recognition. We derive our revenue primarily from rental of residential housing units with lease agreement terms of generally one year or less. We recognize income derived from rents and utility reimbursements on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease. Additionally, any incentives included in the lease are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements or obligations, including contingent obligations, other than guarantees by the General Partner of certain limited standard exceptions to the non-recourse nature of the mortgage notes which are secured by the Properties.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Omitted pursuant to Regulation S-K, Item 305(e)

(Back to Index)

1213

(Back to Index)

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK]

(Back to Index)

1314

(Back to Index)

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Partners of

Resource Real Estate Investors 6, L.P.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Resource Real Estate Investors 6, L.P. (a Delaware partnership) and subsidiaries (the “Partnership”) as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in partners’ capital, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016. Our audits of the basic consolidated financial statements included the financial statement schedules listed in the index appearing under Item 15(a)2. These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Partnership’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Partnership's internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Resource Real Estate Investors 6, L.P. and subsidiaries as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

As described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Partnership has begun its intended process of dissolution, which is expected to be completed in 2017. The Partnership Agreement’s extension term expires on July 30, 2017.

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

March 2928, ~~2016~~2017

(Back to Index)

1415

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 6, L.P.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands)

	December 31,
	2015			2014
	2016			2015
ASSETS
Rental properties, at cost:
Land	$	31,~~129~~685		$	73,~~430~~129
Buildings and improvements	2715,~~823~~061			5927,~~849~~823
Personal property	~~1,510~~779			21,~~384~~510
Assets held for sale - Memorial Towers, net	11,246			—
Total rental properties, at cost	17,525			32,462
Total rental properties, at cost	43,708			69,663
Accumulated depreciation and amortization	(5,628		)	(9,781		)
Accumulated depreciation and amortization	(13,100		)	(18,774		)
Total rental properties, net	11,897			22,681
Total rental properties, net	30,608			50,889
Assets held for sale - Memorial Towers, net	—			7,927
Cash	31,~~233~~516			~~474~~3,233
Restricted cash	~~1,334~~564			1,~~500~~334
Tenant receivables	210			62
Receivables from related parties	165			100
Accounts receivables - other	19			—
Prepaid expenses and other assets	178			128
Receivables from related parties	119			165
Deferred financing costs, net	218			381
Prepaid expenses and other assets	60			178
	$	3514,~~738~~185		$	5335,~~478~~520
LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS’ CAPITAL
Liabilities:
Mortgage notes payable	$	27,499		$	44,559
Mortgage notes payable, net	$	9,782		$	27,281
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	~~352~~303			~~596~~352
Real estate taxes payable	~~1,110~~448			1,~~057~~110
Accrued interest	~~126~~43			~~198~~126
Payables to related parties	~~3,458~~64			3,~~123~~458
Prepaid rent	5217			52
Security deposits	9242			~~178~~92
Total liabilities	3210,~~689~~699			4932,~~763~~471
Partners’ capital	3,~~049~~486			3,~~715~~049
Total liabilities and partners’ capital	$	3514,~~738~~185		$	5335,~~478~~520

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

(Back to Index)

1516

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 6, L.P.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(in thousands, except per unit data)

	For the Years Ended December 31,
	2015			2014
	2016			2015
Revenues:
Rental income	$	105,~~116~~167		$	910,~~854~~116
Expenses:
Rental operating	43,~~949~~108			54,~~257~~949
Management fees – related parties	~~880~~443			~~872~~880
General and administrative	~~507~~585			~~516~~507
Depreciation and amortization	~~2,235~~879			2,~~532~~235
Total expenses	85,~~571~~015			98,~~177~~571
Income before other expenses	1,545			677
Income before other income (expenses)	152			1,545
Other (expenses) income:
Other income (expenses):
Interest expense, net	(21,~~100~~254		)	(2,~~600~~100		)
Gain on sale of rental properties	13,126			—
Gain on sale of rental properties, net	17,435			13,126
Loss on disposal of fixed assets, net	(19		)	(44		)
Loss on disposal of fixed assets	(19		)	(19		)
Total other income (expense)	$	11,007		$	(2,644	)
Loss on extinguishment of debt	(226		)	—
Net income (loss)	$	12,552		$	(1,967	)
Total other income (expense)	15,936			11,007
Net income	$	16,088		$	12,552
Weighted average number of limited partner units outstanding	3,702			3,702
Net income (loss) per weighted average limited partner unit	$	3.39		$	(0.53	)
Net income per weighted average limited partner unit	$	4.35		$	3.39

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

(Back to Index)

1617

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 6, L.P.

CONSOLIDATED ~~STATEMENT~~STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN PARTNERS’ CAPITAL

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ~~2015~~2016 AND ~~2014~~2015

(in thousands, except units)

	General Partner		Limited Partners
			Units	Amount			Total
Balance at January 1, 2014	$	1	3,701,890	$	6,796		$	6,797
Balance at January 1, 2015	$	1	3,701,890	$	3,714		$	3,715
Distributions	—		—	(1,115		)	(1,115		)
Net loss	—		—	(1,967		)	(1,967		)
Balance at December 31, 2014	$	1	3,701,890	$	3,714		$	3,715
Distributions	—		—	(13,218		)	(13,218		)
Net income	—		—	12,552			12,552
Balance at December 31, 2015	$1	1	3,701,890	$3,048	~~3,048~~		$3,049	~~3,049~~
Distributions	—		—	(15,651		)	(15,651		)
Net income	—		—	16,088			16,088
Balance at December 31, 2016	$	1	3,701,890	$	3,485		$	3,486

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

(Back to Index)

1718

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 6, L.P.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

	For the Years Ended
	December 31,
	2015			2014
	2016			2015
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	12,552		$	(1,967	)
Net income	$	16,088		$	12,552
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided byoperating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided byoperating activities:
Gain on sale of rental property	(13,126		)	—
Gain on sale of rental properties	(17,435		)	(13,126		)
Depreciation and amortization	~~2,235~~879			2,~~532~~235
Amortization of deferred financing costs	~~158~~151			~~253~~158
Loss on sale or disposal of fixed assets	19			44
Loss on extinguishment of debt	226			—
Loss on sale or disposal of fixed assets	19			19
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Restricted cash	26224			~~(263~~26		)
Tenant receivables, net	—(13		)	11—
Accounts receivable other	—(32		)	—
Receivables from related parties	~~(65~~46		)	69(65		)
Prepaid expense and other assets	(435		)	11(4		)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	~~(247~~168		)	~~179~~(247		)
Real estate tax payable	~~105~~(255		)	54105
Payables to related parties	~~333~~(3,394		)	~~763~~333
Accrued interest	(444		)	(244		)
Prepaid rent	42(27		)	(842		)
Security deposits	75			97
Net cash provided by operating activities	1,991			1,685
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	(3,319		)	1,991
Cash flows from investing activities:
Proceeds from sale of rental properties	1417,~~839~~605			—14,839
Capital expenditures	(437		)	(320		)
Capital reserve escrow held by lender	(13		)	—
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities	14,402			(320		)
Capital expenditures	(121		)	(437		)
Net cash provided by investing activities	17,471			14,402
Cash flows from financing activities:
Principal payments on mortgage notes payable	(~~416~~320		)	(~~395~~416		)
Distributions to limited partners	(13,218		)	(1,115		)
Refund of defeasance costs	102			—
Net cash used in financing activities	(13,634		)	(1,510		)
Distributions to limited partners	(15,651		)	(13,218		)
Net increase (decrease) in cash	2,759			(145		)
Net cash used in financing activities	(15,869		)	(13,634		)
Cash at beginning of period	474			619
Net (decrease) increase in cash	(1,717		)	2,759
Cash at end of period	$	3,233		$	474
Cash at beginning of period	3,233			474
Cash at end of period	$	1,516		$	3,233
Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities
Settlement of mortgage notes payable with proceeds from sale of rental properties	$	(1617,~~644~~330	)	$	—(16,644	)
Defeasance costs paid in closing with proceeds from sale of rental properties	$	(328	)	$	—

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

(Back to Index)

1819

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 6, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DECEMBER 31, ~~2015~~2016

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF BUSINESS AND OPERATIONS

Resource Real Estate Investors 6, L.P. (“R-6” or the “Partnership”) is a Delaware limited partnership which owns and operates multifamily residential rental properties located in Texas (the “Properties”). The Partnership also has invested in subordinated notes secured by multifamily residential properties located in California and Nevada. The Partnership was formed on July 26, 2007 and commenced operations on October 1, 2007. The Partnership was capitalized by an offering of partnership units which closed on May 19, 2008. The General Partner, Resource Capital Partners, Inc. (“RCP”, the “General Partner” or “GP”), is in the business of sponsoring and managing real estate investment limited partnership and tenant in common programs. RCP contributed $1,000 in cash as its minimum capital contribution to the Partnership. In addition, RCP held a 5.55% ~~and 5.54%~~ limited partnership interest in the Partnership at both December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014, respectively~~2015. RCP is an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Resource America, Inc. (“RAI”), a ~~publicly traded~~ company ~~(NASDAQ: REXI)~~ operating in the real estate, financial fund management and commercial finance sectors.

InOn ~~accordance~~September ~~with~~8, ~~the~~2016, ~~First~~RAI ~~Amended~~was ~~and~~acquired ~~Restated~~by ~~Agreement~~C-III ofCapital ~~Limited~~Partners ~~Partnership~~LLC (~~the~~ "~~Agreement~~C-III"), ~~the~~ GPa ~~has~~leading ~~the~~commercial ~~right~~real toestate ~~extend~~services ~~the~~company ~~Partnership~~engaged ~~term~~in ~~for~~ a ~~maximum~~broad range of ~~two~~activities. C-~~years~~III inindirectly ~~the~~controls ~~aggregate~~RCP ~~following~~and ~~the~~all ~~initial~~of ~~termination date. In June 2015,~~ the GPpartnership ~~extended~~units ~~the~~of ~~Partnership for one year until July 30, 2016. The GP intends to extend~~ the Partnership ~~for~~currently ~~one~~owned ~~additional~~by ~~year~~RCP.

The ~~Agreement~~General ~~provides~~Partner ~~that~~has ~~income~~complete isand ~~allocated~~exclusive asdiscretion ~~follows:~~in ~~first~~the management of our business. On June 29, 2015, by written notice to the partners, inthe ~~proportion~~General toPartner ~~and~~elected to extend the ~~extent~~term offor ~~the~~one ~~deficit~~year ~~balances~~to July 30, if2016. ~~any~~On May 20, in2016, ~~their~~by ~~respective~~written ~~capital~~notice ~~accounts;~~to ~~second~~the partners, the General Partner elected to extend the ~~partners~~term infor ~~proportion~~one additional year to July 30, 2017 to maximize the ~~allocations~~Partnership's return to its partners. The Partnership has begun the process of ~~Distributable~~dissolution ~~Cash~~through ~~(as~~the ~~defined~~strategic indisposal of assets. On December 1, 2015, the ~~Agreement);~~Partnership sold its interest in both Coach Lantern and ~~third,~~Foxcroft. ~~100%~~Memorial toTowers ~~the~~was ~~limited~~sold ~~partners~~on ~~(“LPs”)~~May 9, 2016. ~~All~~ ~~losses~~Villas ~~are~~of ~~allocated~~Henderson asPass ~~follows:~~was ~~first~~sold on September 26, ~~100%~~2016. The remaining asset, Park Hill, is expected to be disposed of in 2017. If the ~~LPs~~Partnership ~~until~~is unable to sell Park Hill before the ~~LPs~~July ~~have~~30, ~~been~~2017 ~~allocated~~termination ~~losses~~date ~~equal~~of the Agreement, the General Partner plans to extend the ~~excess~~Partnership's term, ifwhich requires ~~any,~~majority consent of ~~their~~the ~~aggregate~~limited ~~capital~~partners. In ~~account~~the ~~balances~~event ~~over~~majority consent is not obtained, the ~~aggregate~~General ~~Adjusted~~Partner ~~Capital~~may ~~Contributions~~dispose ~~(as~~the ~~defined~~property inpursuant to the liquidation provisions of the Agreement);. ~~second~~Under those provisions, toshould the ~~partners~~General inPartner ~~proportion~~conclude tothat ~~and~~an immediate sale of Park Hill would cause undue loss to the ~~extent~~partners, ofthe ~~their~~Partnership ~~respective~~may ~~remaining~~distribute ~~positive~~Park ~~capital~~Hill ~~account~~to ~~balances~~a liquidating trust, ifto ~~any;~~facilitate ~~and~~an ~~third,~~orderly ~~100%~~sale toof ~~the~~Park ~~LPs~~Hill.

The Partnership's First Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership (the "Agreement") provides that income is allocated as follows: first, to the partners in proportion to and to the extent of the deficit balances, if any, in their respective capital accounts; second, to the partners in proportion to the allocations of Distributable Cash (as defined in the Agreement); and third, 100% to the limited partners (“LPs”). All losses are allocated as follows: first, 100% to the LPs until the LPs have been allocated losses equal to the excess, if any, of their aggregate capital account balances over the aggregate Adjusted Capital Contributions (as defined in the Agreement); second, to the partners in proportion to and to the extent of their respective remaining positive capital account balances, if any; and third, 100% to the LPs.

Distributable cash from operations, payable monthly, as determined by the GP, is first allocated 100% to the LPs until the LPs have received their Preferred Return (as defined in the Agreement); and thereafter, 80% to the LPs and 20% to the GP.

Distributable cash from capital transactions, as determined by the GP, is first allocated 100% to the LPs until the LPs have received their Preferred Return; second, 100% to the LP’s until their Adjusted Capital Contributions (as defined in the Agreement) have been reduced to zero; and thereafter, 80% to the LPs and 20% to the GP.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

A summary of the significant accounting policies consistently applied in the preparation of the accompanying consolidated financial statements follows:

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Partnership and its wholly owned subsidiaries, as follows:

Subsidiaries	Number of Units	Location
RRE Memorial Towers Holdings, LLC (“Memorial Towers”)	112	Houston, Texas
RRE Villas Holdings, LLC (“Villas”)	228	San Antonio, Texas
RRE Coach Lantern Holdings, LLC (“Coach Lantern”)	—	(1)
RRE Foxcroft Holdings, LLC (“Foxcroft”)	—	(1)
RRE Park Hill Holdings, LLC (“Park Hill”)	288	San Antonio, Texas
Total	628

(1) The partnership sold its interests in Coach Lantern and Foxcroft on December 1, 2015.

The Partnership also owns a 100% interest in RRE Funding II, LLC (“Funding”), which owns two non-performing subordinated notes, Acacia Park (“Acacia”) and Southern Cove (“Southern Cove”), with a combined face value of $2.5 million. During the year ended December 31, 2012, the loans were deemed uncollectible and charged off.

All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

(Back to Index)

1920

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 6, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS − (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, ~~2015~~2016



Subsidiaries	Number of Units	Location
RRE Memorial Towers Holdings, LLC (“Memorial Towers”)	—	(1)
RRE Villas Holdings, LLC (“Villas”)	—	(2)
RRE Coach Lantern Holdings, LLC (“Coach Lantern”)	—	(3)
RRE Foxcroft Holdings, LLC (“Foxcroft”)	—	(4)
RRE Park Hill Holdings, LLC (“Park Hill”)	288	San Antonio, Texas
Total	288

(1) The partnership sold its interests in Memorial Towers on May 9, 2016.

(2) The partnership sold its interests in Villas on September 26, 2016.

(3) The partnership sold its interests in Coach Lantern on December 1, 2015. The subsidiary was legally dissolved on August 29, 2016.

(4) The partnership sold its interests in Foxcroft on December 1, 2015. The subsidiary was legally dissolved on August 29, 2016.

The Partnership also owns a 100% interest in RRE Funding II, LLC (“Funding”), which owns a non-performing subordinated note, Southern Cove (“Southern Cove”), with a face value of $590,000. Funding also previously owned the non-performing subordinated note, Acacia Park ("Acacia"), which was resolved in July 2016 and had a face value of $2 million. Both notes went into default in 2009, and during the year ended December 31, 2012, they were deemed uncollectible and charged off. The senior note, to which Acacia was subordinated, was partially paid off via refinance in July 2016. The refinancing proceeds were not sufficient for Funding to recover any portion of the note. Due to the refinancing, the Partnership no longer owns the note and RCP no longer manages the investment.

All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Geographic Concentration Risk

As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, the ~~Company~~Partnership’s net ~~investments~~investment in ~~real~~Park ~~estate~~Hill, located in San Antonio, Texas, represented 100% of the Partnership’s ~~total~~real estate assets. As a result, the geographic concentration of the Partnership’s portfolio makes it particularly susceptible to adverse economic developments in the San Antonio, Texas’ real estate market. Any adverse economic or real estate developments in this market could adversely affect the Partnership’s operating results.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Partnership estimates the allowance for uncollectible receivables and loan losses and adjusts the balance quarterly. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Assets Held for Sale

The Partnership presents the assets and liabilities of any rental properties that qualify as held for sale separately in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Real estate assets held for sale are measured at the lower of carrying amount or fair value less cost to sell. Subsequent to classification of an asset as held for sale, no further depreciation is recorded. At December 31, 2016, the Partnership had no rental properties included in assets held for sale. Assets are classified as held for sale upon execution of a Purchase and Sales Agreement.

Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information

The Partnership paid approximately $21.02 million, and $2.30 million in cash for interest during the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, respectively.

Deferred Financing Costs

Costs incurred to obtain financing have been capitalized and are being amortized over the term of the related debt using the effective yield method. In accordance with adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") Accounting Standards

Income Taxes

The Partnership is not subject to Income taxes as all earnings are taxable to the individual partners. Income taxes or credits resulting from earnings or losses are payable by or accrue to the benefit of the partners; accordingly, no provision has been made for income taxes in these consolidated financial statements. At December 31, 2015 there is a GAAP book basis to tax basis difference of $566,000 due to different depreciation methods utilized.

The Partnership evaluates the benefits of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in its tax returns under a two-step recognition and measurement process. Only the largest amount of benefits from the tax positions that will more likely than not be sustainable upon examination are recognized by the Partnership. The Partnership does not have any unrecognized tax benefits, nor interest and penalties, recorded in the Consolidated Balance Sheets or Consolidated Statements of Operations and does not anticipate significant adjustments to the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits within the next twelve months.

The Partnership is subject to examination by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and by the taxing authorities in those states in which the Partnership has significant business operations. The Partnership is not currently undergoing any examinations by taxing authorities. The Partnership may be subject to U.S. federal income tax and state/local income tax examinations for the years 2012 through 2015.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is primarily derived from the rental of residential housing units with lease agreement terms of generally one year or less. The Partnership recognizes revenue in the period that rent is earned, which is on a monthly basis. The Partnership recognizes rent as income on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease. Additionally, any incentives included in the lease are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease.

Included within rental income are other income amounts such as utility reimbursements, late fees, parking fees, pet fees and lease application fees which are recognized when earned or received.

The future minimum rental payments to be received from noncancelable operating leases total approximately $4 million and $128,000 for the twelve months ending December 31, 2016 and 2017, respectively, and none thereafter.

(Back to Index)

2021

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 6, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS − (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, ~~2015~~2016

Update ("ASU") 2015-03 "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs", the Partnership has recorded deferred financing costs as a direct reduction of the related mortgage notes payable.

Income Taxes

The Partnership is not subject to income taxes as all earnings are taxable to the individual partners. Income taxes or credits resulting from earnings or losses are payable by or accrue to the benefit of the partners; accordingly, no provision has been made for income taxes in these consolidated financial statements. At December 31, 2016, there is a GAAP book basis to tax basis difference of approximately $9,400 due to different depreciation methods utilized.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is primarily derived from the rental of residential housing units with lease agreement terms of generally one year or less. The Partnership recognizes revenue in the period that rent is earned, which is on a monthly basis. The Partnership recognizes rent as income on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease. Additionally, any incentives included in the lease, if significant, are amortized on a straight-line basis over the term of the related lease.

Included within rental income are other income amounts such as utility reimbursements, late fees, parking fees, pet fees and lease application fees which are recognized when earned. Total other income was $658,000 and $948,000 for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

The future minimum rental payments to be received from noncancelable operating leases total approximately $1.2 million and $11,000 for the twelve months ending December 31, 2017 and 2018, respectively, and none thereafter.

Loans Held for Investment, Net

The Partnership recognizes revenue from the loans it holds for investment as interest income using the effective yield method.

The initial investment made in a purchased loan includes the amount paid to the seller plus any fees. The initial investment frequently differs from the related loan’s principal amount at the date of purchase. This difference is recognized as an adjustment of the yield over the life of the loan.

The Partnership initially records its loans at their purchase price, and subsequently accounts for them based on their outstanding principal plus or minus any unamortized premiums or discounts.

Long-Lived Assets

The Partnership reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If there is a triggering event and it is determined that an asset’s estimated future cash flows will not be sufficient to recover its carrying amount, then an impairment charge will be recorded to reduce the carrying amount for that asset to its estimated fair value. The Partnership ~~has estimated that the future cash flows from its Properties will be sufficient to recover their carrying amounts and, as a result, the Partnership~~ did not recognize any impairment losses with respect to its Properties for either the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 or ~~2014~~2015.

Rental Properties

Rental properties are carried at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Land is not depreciated. Buildings and improvements and personal property are depreciated for financial reporting purposes on the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives. The value of in-place leases is amortized over twelve months on a straight-line basis. Useful lives used for calculating depreciation for financial reporting purposes are as follows:

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 6, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS − (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, 2016

useful lives. The value of acquired in-place leases is amortized over twelve months on a straight-line basis. Useful lives used for calculating depreciation for financial reporting purposes are as follows:



	Buildings and improvements	5 - 27.5 years
	Personal property	3 - 15 years

Advertising

The Partnership expenses advertising costs as they are incurred. Advertising costs, which are included in rental operating expenses, totaled $~~121~~69,000 and $~~125~~121,000 for the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, respectively.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Partnership to concentration of credit risk, consist of periodic temporary deposits of cash. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation provides insurance for all deposit accounts, deposits and accrued interest, in the amount of $250,000 per account held at an insured bank. As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, the Partnership had $51.08 million of deposits at various banks, $31.41 million of which were over the insurance limit of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Tenant Receivables

Tenant receivables are stated in the financial statements at amounts due from tenants net of an allowance for uncollectible receivables. Payment terms vary and receivables outstanding longer than the payment terms are considered past due. The Partnership determines its allowance by considering a number of factors, including the length of time receivables are past due, security deposits held, the Partnership’s previous loss history, the tenants’ current ability to pay their obligations to the Partnership, the general condition of the economy and the industry as a whole. The Partnership writes off receivables when they become uncollectible. At both December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, ~~the~~there was no allowance for uncollectible receivables ~~was $0 and $0, respectively~~.

Redemptions

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 6, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS − (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, 2015

The LPs may request redemption of their units at any time. The Partnership has no obligation to redeem any units and will do so only at the GP’s discretion. If the Partnership redeems units, the redemption price is generally the amount of the initial investment less all distributions from the Partnership to the LP, and less all organization and offering expenses charged to the LP.

Recent Accounting Standards

In ~~April~~August 2014, ~~the~~FASB ~~Financial~~issued ~~Accounting~~ASU ~~Standards~~2014-15, ~~Board (~~"~~FASB")~~Presentation ~~issued~~of ~~authoritative~~Financial ~~guidance~~Statements-Going toConcern ~~change~~(Subtopic ~~the~~205-40): ~~criteria~~Disclosure ~~for~~of ~~reporting~~Uncertainties ~~discontinued~~about ~~operations.~~an ~~Under~~Entity’s ~~the~~Ability ~~new~~to ~~guidance,~~Continue ~~only~~as ~~disposals representing~~ a ~~strategic~~Going ~~shift~~Concern." inUnder athe ~~company's~~guidance, ~~operations~~an ~~and~~entity ~~financial~~should ~~results~~evaluate ~~should~~whether bethere ~~reported~~are asconditions ~~discontinued~~or ~~operations~~events, ~~with~~considered ~~expanded~~in ~~disclosures.~~the ~~In addition~~aggregate, ~~disclosure~~that ofraise ~~the~~substantial ~~pre-tax~~doubt ~~income~~about ~~attributable~~the toentity’s aability ~~disposal~~to ofcontinue as a ~~significant~~going ~~part~~concern ofwithin anone ~~organization~~year ~~that~~after ~~does~~the ~~not~~date ~~qualify~~that asthe ~~discontinued~~financial ~~operations~~statements isare ~~required~~issued. ~~This~~The guidance is effective for the ~~Partnership~~annual asperiod ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, ~~2015.~~2016 did not have a significant impact on the Partnership's consolidated financial statements.

~~Accounting~~In ~~Standards~~January ~~Issued~~2015, ~~But~~FASB ~~Not~~issued ~~Yet~~ASU ~~Effective~~2015-01, "Income Statement - Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20), Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items. " ("ASU 2015-01"). The amendments in ASU 2015-01 eliminate from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. Although the amendment will eliminate the requirements for reporting entities to consider whether an underlying event or transaction is extraordinary, the presentation and disclosure guidance for items that are unusual in nature or occur infrequently will be retained and will be expanded to include items that are both unusual in nature and infrequently occurring. ASU 2015-01 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015. The adoption of this guidance on January 1, 2016 did not have a significant impact on the Partnership's consolidated financial statements.

In ~~May~~February ~~2014~~2015, FASB issued ~~Accounting Standards Update (“~~ASU") ~~No. 2014~~2015-0902, ~~“Revenue~~"Consolidation ~~from~~(Topic ~~Contracts~~810): ~~with~~Amendments ~~Customers”,~~to ~~which~~the ~~will~~Consolidation ~~replace~~Analysis" ~~most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP. The core principle of~~ (“ASU ~~No. 2014~~2015-0902”), iswhich ~~that~~makes ancertain ~~entity~~changes ~~should~~to ~~recognize~~both ~~revenue for~~ the ~~transfer~~variable ofinterest ~~goods~~model orand ~~services equal to~~ the ~~amount~~voting ~~that~~model, itincluding ~~expects~~changes to be(1) ~~entitled to receive for those goods or services. ASU No. 2014-09 requires additional disclosure about~~ the ~~nature,~~identification ~~amount,~~of ~~timing~~variable ~~and~~interests ~~uncertainty~~(fees ofpaid ~~revenue~~to ~~and~~a ~~cash~~decision ~~flows~~maker ~~arising~~or ~~from~~service ~~customer contracts~~provider), ~~including~~(2) ~~significant~~the ~~judgments~~variable ~~and~~interest ~~changes~~entity incharacteristics ~~judgments. ASU No. 2014-09 will be effective~~ for ~~the~~a ~~Partnership~~limited ~~beginning~~partnership ~~January~~or 1,similar ~~2018,~~entity ~~including interim periods in 2018,~~ and ~~allows~~(3) ~~for~~the ~~both~~primary ~~retrospective~~beneficiary ~~and prospective methods of adoption~~determination. ~~The~~ASU ~~Partnership~~2015-02 is ~~in the process of determining the method of adoption and assessing the impact of this guidance on the Partnership’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.~~

In August 2014, FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, "Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern." Under the new guidance, an entity should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued. The guidance is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of the new requirements is not expected to have a significant impact on the Partnership's consolidated financial statements.

In January 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-01, "Income Statement - Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20), Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items. The amendments in ASU No. 2015-01 eliminate from GAAP the concept of extraordinary items. Although the amendment will eliminate the requirements for reporting entities to consider whether an underlying event or transaction is extraordinary, the presentation and disclosure guidance for items that are unusual in nature or occur infrequently will be retained and will be expanded to include items that are both unusual in nature and infrequently occurring. ASU No. 2015-01 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted provided that the guidance is applied from the beginning of the fiscal year of adoption. The Partnership does not expect the adoption of ASU No. 2015-01 to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-02, "Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis" (“ASU 2015-02”), which makes certain changes to both the variable interest model and the voting model, including changes to (1) the identification of variable interests (fees paid to a decision maker or service provider), (2) the variable interest entity characteristics for a limited partnership or similar entity and (3) the primary beneficiary determination. ASU 2015-02 is effective for the Partnership beginning January 1, 2016. The Partnership is continuing to evaluate this guidance; however, it does not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-02 to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, "Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs" ("ASU 2015-03"), which requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected. Upon adoption, the Partnership will apply the new guidance on a retrospective basis and adjust the balance sheet of each individual period presented to reflect the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance. This guidance is effective for the Partnership beginning January 1, 2016. The Partnership is continuing to evaluate this guidance; however, it does not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-03 to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements..

(Back to Index)

2223

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 6, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS − (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, ~~2015~~2016

In September 2015, FASB issued ASU 2015-16, "Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments" ("ASU 2015-16"), which eliminates the requirement to retroactively revise comparative financial information for prior periods presented in financial statements due to changes in provisional amounts recorded for acquisitions in subsequent periods. Upon adoption, disclosure of the amounts recorded in current-period earnings that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized at the acquisition date are required. ASU 2015-16 is effective for the Partnership beginning January 1, 2016. The ~~Partnership~~adoption isof ~~continuing to evaluate~~ this guidance; ~~however~~on January 1, it2016 ~~does~~did not ~~expect the adoption of ASU 2015-16 to~~ have a significant impact on ~~its~~the Partnership's consolidated financial statements.

In ~~February~~April ~~2016~~2015, the FASB issued ASU ~~No. 2016~~2015-0203, "~~Leases~~Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs" ("ASU ~~No. 2016~~2015-0203"), which isrequires ~~intended~~that debt issuance costs related to ~~improve~~a ~~financial~~recognized ~~reporting~~debt ~~about~~liability ~~leasing~~be ~~transactions~~presented ~~and~~in ~~requires~~the ~~organizations~~balance ~~that~~sheet ~~leaser~~as ~~assets~~a todirect ~~recognize~~deduction onfrom the ~~balance~~carrying ~~sheet~~amount ~~the~~of ~~assets~~that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and ~~liabilities~~measurement guidance for ~~the~~debt ~~rights~~issuance ~~and~~costs ~~obligations~~are ~~created~~not affected. This guidance was adopted by ~~those~~the ~~leases.~~Partnership ~~ASU~~beginning ~~No.~~January 1, 2016~~-02~~. isAs ~~effective~~required ~~for~~by ~~fiscal~~ASU ~~years~~2015-03, ~~and~~the ~~interim~~Partnership ~~periods~~applied ~~within~~the ~~those~~new ~~fiscal~~guidance ~~years,~~on ~~beginning~~a ~~after~~retrospective ~~December~~basis ~~15,~~and ~~2018. The~~adjusted ~~Company~~the isbalance ~~continuing~~sheet of each individual period presented to ~~evaluate~~reflect ~~this~~the period-specific effects of applying the new guidance;. ~~however~~The Partnership has reclassified $218,000 itof ~~does~~debt ~~not~~issuance ~~expect~~costs ~~the~~at ~~adoption~~December of31, ~~ASU~~2015 ~~No.~~from ~~2016-02~~assets to ~~have~~liabilities ~~significant~~as ~~impact~~a ondirect ~~its~~reduction ~~consolidated~~of ~~financial~~the ~~statements~~related mortgage notes payable.

prior periods presented in financial statements due to changes in provisional amounts recorded for acquisitions in subsequent periods. Disclosure of the amounts recorded in current-period earnings that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized at the acquisition date are required. The Partnership adopted this guidance; however, it did not have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15 "Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments" ("ASU 2016-15"), which addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing existing diversity in practice. ASU 2016-15 has been early adopted by the Partnership. As result of adoption, the Partnership has classified cash received in conjunction with the early extinguishment of debt as cash provided by financing activities.

Accounting Standards Issued But Not Yet Effective

In May 2014, FASB issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers”, which will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP. The core principle of ASU 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue for the transfer of goods or services equal to the amount that it expects to be entitled to receive for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments. ASU 2014-09 will be effective for the Partnership beginning January 1, 2018, including interim periods in 2018, and allows for both retrospective and prospective methods of adoption. The Partnership is in the process of determining the method of adoption and assessing the impact of this guidance on the Partnership’s consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

In February 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, "Leases ("ASU 2016-02"), which is intended to improve financial reporting about leasing transactions and requires organizations that lease assets to recognize on the balance sheet the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by those leases. ASU 2016-02 is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. The Partnership is continuing to evaluate this guidance; however, it does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-02 to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13 “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses” (ASU 2016-13) which requires measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held. The standard update is effective for the Partnership beginning January 1, 2019. The Partnership is continuing to evaluate this guidance; however, it does not expect the adoption of ASU 2016-13 to have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, “Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash” (“ASU 2016-18”), which provides guidance on the classification of restricted cash in the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-18 is effective for the Partnership for the fiscal year beginning November 1, 2018 and the adoption of ASU 2016-18 is not expected to have a material effect on the Partnership's consolidated financial statements and disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, "Business Combinations (Topic 850): Clarifying the Definition of Business" ("ASU 2017-01"), which clarifies the definition of a business with the objective of adding guidance to assist entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals) of businesses. ASU 2017-01 is effective for the Partnership beginning January 1, 2018, but early adoption is allowed. The Partnership is continuing to evaluate this guidance.

NOTE 3 − RESTRICTED CASH

Restricted cash represents escrow deposits with lenders to be used to pay real estate taxes, insurance, and capital improvements. A summary of the components of restricted cash follows (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2015		2014
Real estate taxes	$	1,107	$	1,122
Insurance	185		242
Capital improvements	42		136
Total	$	1,334	$	1,500

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 6, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS − (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, 2015

NOTE 4 – DEFERRED FINANCING COSTS

Deferred financing costs include unamortized costs incurred to obtain financing which are being amortized over the term of the related debt. Accumulated amortization as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $1.2 million and $1.7 million, respectively. Estimated amortization of the Properties’ existing deferred financing costs for the remaining life of the underlying notes ending December 31, is as follows (in thousands):

2016	$	144
2017	61
2018	13
	$	218

NOTE 5 – MORTGAGE NOTES PAYABLE

The following is a summary of mortgage notes payable (in thousands, except percentages):

Property	Balance at December 31, 2015		Balance at December 31, 2014		MaturityDate	Annual Interest Rate	Average Monthly Debt Service
Memorial Towers	$	7,109	$	7,214	1/1/2017	5.49%	$	42	(1)
Villas	10,375		10,528		1/1/2017	5.48%	$	61	(1)
Coach Lantern	—		7,884		2/1/2016	2.69%	$	—	(2)
Foxcroft	—		8,760		2/1/2016	2.69%	$	—	(2)
Park Hill	10,015		10,173		3/1/2018	5.05%	$	56	(1)
Total	$	27,499	$	44,559

_________________

(1) Monthly payments includes principal and interest at a fixed rate.

(2) Partnership sold the property on December 1, 2015 and paid off the mortgage.

Annual principal payments on the mortgage notes payable for the future years ending December 31, are as follows (in thousands):

2016	$	435
2017	17,390
2018	9,674
	$	27,499

In addition, to annual principal payments on the mortgage notes payable, total aggregate required escrow payments are $1.6 million through March 1, 2018.

The mortgage notes payable are with recourse only to the Properties securing them subject to certain limited standard exceptions, as defined in the mortgage notes, which the General Partner has guaranteed with respect to each property. These exceptions are referred to as “carveouts”. In general, carveouts relate to damages suffered by the lender for a subsidiary’s failure to pay rents, insurance or condemnation proceeds to the lender, to pay water, sewer and other public assessments or charges, to pay environmental compliance costs or to deliver books and records, in each case as required in the loan documents. The exceptions also require the General Partner to guarantee payment of audit costs, lender’s enforcement of its rights under the loan documents and payment of the loan if the subsidiary voluntarily files for bankruptcy or seeks reorganization, or if a related party of the subsidiary does so with respect to the subsidiary.

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 6, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS − (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, ~~2015~~2016

NOTE 6 – CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS



	December 31,
	2016		2015
Real estate taxes	$	438	$	1,107
Insurance	71		185
Capital improvements	55		42
Total	$	564	$	1,334

NOTE 4 – CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In the ordinary course of its business operations, the Partnership has ongoing relationships with several related entities. Receivables from and payables to related parties are summarized as follows (in thousands):

	December 31,
	2015		2014
	2016		2015
Receivables from related parties:
RAI and affiliates	$	~~165~~119	$	~~100~~165
Payables to related parties:
RAI and affiliates	$	~~3,458~~64	$	3,~~123~~458

Substantially all of the receivables from related parties ~~represents~~represent ~~escrow~~insurance ~~funds~~deposits held in escrow by ~~RAI~~Resource Real Estate, Inc ("RRE") for self- insurance, which, if unused, will be returned to the Partnership. The Partnership's properties participate in insurance pools with other properties directly and indirectly managed by RAI for both the property insurance and general liability. ~~RAI~~RRE holds the ~~escrow~~deposits ~~funds~~in ~~related~~escrow to ~~the~~fund future insurance ~~pool on its books~~claims. The ~~Partnership's~~pool ~~properties~~for ~~paid~~property ~~a total~~ insurance ~~premium of $129,000. The insurance pool~~ covers losses up to $2.5 million and the pool for ~~property~~the general liability covers losses ~~and~~up to the first $2550,000 of each general liability ~~loss up to an annual maximum of $1 million~~incident. Catastrophic insurance would cover ~~property~~ losses in excess of the insurance ~~pool~~pools up to $140 million and $51.0 million, respectively. Therefore, unforeseen or catastrophic losses in excess of the Partnership's insured limits could have a material adverse effect on the Partnership's financial condition and operating results. In the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, the Partnership paid approximately $97,000 and $129,000 into the insurance pools.

RCP is entitled to receive an annual investment management fee, payable monthly, equal to 1% of the gross offering proceeds that have been deployed in real estate investments, net of any amounts otherwise attributable to LP interests owned by RCP. During the term of the Partnership, RCP must subordinate up to 100% of its annual investment management fee to the receipt by the LPs of their Preferred Return. Investment management fees due to RCP at December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 totaled $24,000 and $2.7 million, ~~and~~respectively. In the year ended December 31, 2016, the Partnership paid RCP approximately $2.48 million, ~~respectively~~for investment management fees.

A wholly-owned subsidiary of RCP, Resource Real Estate Management, LLC (“RREML”) is entitled to receive property and debt management fees as set forth in the table below. RREML engaged Resource Real Estate Management, Inc (“RREMI”), an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of RAI, to manage the Partnership’s Properties. Management fees due to RCP and affiliates at December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 totaled $~~563~~13,000 and $~~435~~563,000, respectively.

During the ordinary course of business, RCP and RREMI advance funds for ordinary operating expenses on behalf of the Properties. Operating expense advances due to RCP and RREMI at December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 totaled $~~204~~27,000 and $~~252~~204,000, respectively. Total reimbursable operating expenses ~~reimbursed~~ during the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 were $~~1.6~~972,000 ~~million~~ and $1.56 million, respectively. ~~Reimbursed~~Reimbursable expenses include payroll and miscellaneous operating expenses. ~~Reimbursed~~Reimbursable operating expenses are included in property operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

The Partnership is obligated to pay fees to related parties. These activities are summarized as follows (in thousands):

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 6, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS − (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, ~~2015~~2016

The Partnership is obligated to pay fees to related parties. These activities are summarized as follows (in thousands):



	Years Ended
	December 31,
	2016		2015
RCP:
Investment management fees (1)	$	163	$	329

RREML:
Property management fees (2)	249		501
Debt management fees (3)	31		50
	280		551
	$	443	$	880

	Years Ended
	December 31,
	2015		2014
RCP:
Investment management fees (1)	$	329	$	339
RREML:
Property management fees (2)	501		492
Debt management fees (3)	50		41
	551		533
	$	880	$	872

_______________

(1)

RCP is entitled to receive an annual investment management fee, payable monthly, equal to 1% of the gross proceeds that have been deployed in real estate investments from the offering of partnership units, net of any LP interest owned by RCP. During the term of the Partnership, RCP must subordinate up to 100% of its annual investment management fee to the receipt by the LPs of their Preferred Return.


(2)	RREML is entitled to receive monthly property management fees equal to 5% of the gross operating revenues from the Partnership’s 100% owned Properties for managing or obtaining and supervising third party managers.


(3)	RREML is also entitled to receive monthly debt management fees equal to 0.167% (2% per annum) of the gross offering proceeds that have been invested in loans held for investment. The fee is earned for monitoring the performance of the Partnership’s loans held for investment.

NOTE 75 –~~FAIR~~ ~~VALUE~~MORTGAGE OFNOTES ~~FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS~~PAYABLE

The following is a summary of mortgage notes payable (in thousands, except percentages):



	December 31, 2016							December 31, 2015
Collateral	Outstanding Borrowings		Deferred finance costs, net			Carrying Value		Outstanding Borrowings		Deferred finance costs, net			Carrying Value
Memorial Towers	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	7,109	$	(39	)	$	7,070
Villas	—		—			—		10,375		(57		)	10,318
Park Hill	9,849		(67		)	9,782		10,015		(122		)	9,893
	$	9,849	$	(67	)	$	9,782	$	27,499	$	(218	)	$	27,281

Memorial Towers was sold on May 9, 2016, and Villas of Henderson was sold on September 26, 2016. Proceeds from these sales were used to pay the outstanding borrowings and were paid directly to the lender at settlement. The Partnership incurred losses of $204,000 and $22,000 on extinguishment of debt as a result of the prepayments during 2016 for Memorial Towers and Villas, respectively.

The following table includes additional information about the Partnership's remaining mortgage note payable, net (in thousands):



Collateral	Maturity Date	Annual Interest Rate	Average Monthly Debt Service
Park Hill	3/1/2018	5.05%	$	56	⁽¹⁾

(1) Monthly payment includes principal and interest.

Annual principal payments on the mortgage note payable for the future years ending December 31, are as follows (in thousands):

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 6, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS − (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, 2016



2017	$	175
2018	9,674
	$	9,849

In addition to annual principal payments on the mortgage notes payable, aggregate required escrow payments will total $667,000 through March 1, 2018.

Deferred financing costs include unamortized costs incurred to obtain financing which are being amortized over the term of the related debt. Accumulated amortization as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 was $497,000 and $1.2 million, respectively. Estimated amortization of the Properties’ existing deferred financing costs for the remaining life of the underlying note for the future years ending December 31, is as follows (in thousands):



2017	$	54
2018	13
	$	67

NOTE 6 –FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

In analyzing the fair value of its financial instruments disclosed or accounted for on a fair value basis, the Partnership follows the fair value hierarchy, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The Partnership determines fair value based on quoted prices when available or, if quoted prices are not available, through the use of alternative approaches, such as discounting the expected cash flows using market interest rates commensurate with the credit quality and duration of the financial instruments. The fair value of cash, tenant receivables, and accounts payables approximate their carrying values due to their short term nature. The hierarchy followed defines three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 - Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or can be corroborated with observable market data for substantially the entire contractual term of the asset.

Level 3 - Unobservable inputs that reflect the entity’s own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in the pricing of the asset and are consequently not based on market activity, but rather through particular valuation techniques.

The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instruments for which it is practicable to estimate that value:


•	Mortgage notes payable. Rates currently available to the Partnership for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate the fair value of existing debt.

(Back to Index)

2627

(Back to Index)

RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 6, L.P.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS − (Continued)

DECEMBER 31, ~~2015~~2016

The carrying amount and estimated fair values of the Partnership’s financial instruments were as follows (in thousands):

	December 31, 2015				December 31, 2014
	December 31, 2016				December 31, 2015
	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Carrying Amount		Fair Value
	Principal Balance		Fair Value		Principal Balance		Fair Value
Mortgage notes payable:
Memorial Towers	$	~~7,109~~—	$	~~7,255~~—	$	7,~~214~~109	$	7,~~503~~255
Villas	~~10,375~~—		~~10,587~~—		10,~~528~~375		10,~~948~~587
Coach Lantern	—		—		7,884		7,904
Park Hill	9,849		10,016		10,015		10,328
Foxcroft	—		—		8,760		8,782
Total mortgage notes payable	$	9,849	$	10,016	$	27,499	$	28,170
Park Hill	10,015		10,328		10,173		10,604
Total mortgage notes payable	$	27,499	$	28,170	$	44,559	$	45,741

~~NOTE~~The 8principal –balance ~~SALE~~of OFthe ~~RENTAL~~mortgage ~~PROPERTY~~notes payable presented is the outstanding borrowings, excluding deferred finance costs, net. The fair value of the mortgage notes payable was estimated using rates available to the Partnership for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities (Level 3).

~~The~~NOTE Company presents the gain on sale of rental property in the Consolidated Statement of Operations and Cash Flow Statement. In December 2015, the Partnership sold its interests in Coach Lantern and Foxcroft and recognized gains of $7.8 ~~million~~– ~~and~~DISPOSITION ~~$5.3~~OF million on the sales, respectively. Pretax net income (loss) for Coach Lantern was $406,000 and $(5,160) for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Pretax net income (loss) for Foxcroft was $372,000 and $(84,578) for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. PROPERTIES

The following table presents details of our disposition activity during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):



Multifamily Community	Location	Sale Date	Contract Sales Price		2016 Gain on Sale
2016 Dispositions
Memorial Towers	Houston, Texas	5/9/2016	$	18,000	$	9,739
Villas	San Antonio, Texas	9/26/2016	$	18,000	7,683
					$	17,422

2015 Dispositions					2016 Gain on Sale		2015 Gain on Sale
Foxcroft	Scarborough, Maine	12/1/2015	$	15,200	$	1	$	5,291
Coach Lantern	Scarborough, Maine	12/1/2015	$	16,750	12		7,835
					$	13	$	13,126

The table below presents the revenues and net income attributable to properties sold for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):



Multifamily Community	Revenues Attributable to Property		Net Income Attributable to Property
2016 Dispositions
Memorial Towers	$	788	$	9,503
Villas of Henderson	1,708		7,396
	$	2,496	$	16,899

2015 Dispositions
Foxcroft	$	1,636	$	5,664
Coach Lantern	1,480		8,241
	$	3,117	$	13,906

(Back to Index)

NOTE 8 – CASUALTY LOSS

In May 2016, a car fire damaged a balcony of the Park Hill building. The property was insured for the damage. Non-capitalized expenses incurred in conjunction with this claim totaled $10,000, and the property received $9,000 in insurance proceeds. Accordingly, $1,000 was expensed as casualty loss.

In July 2016, a storm substantially damaged the main building of Villas of Henderson. The property was insured for the damage. Non-capitalized expenses incurred in conjunction with this claim totaled $72,000, and the property received $45,000 in insurance proceeds. Accordingly, $27,000 was expensed as casualty loss. Casualty losses are included in rental operating expenses on the consolidated statements of operations.

NOTE 9 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The partnership is under contract to sell Memorial Towers as of March 10, 2016 for $18 million.

The Partnership has evaluated subsequent events through the date these consolidated financial statements were issued and determined that no events have occurred which would require an adjustment to the consolidated financial statements.

(Back to Index)

2729

(Back to Index)

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS

ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic reports under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our General Partner, including its chief executive officer and its chief financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, our management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and our management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

Under the supervision of the chief executive officer and chief financial officer of our General Partner, we have carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our General Partner is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our General Partner assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016. In making this assessment, the General Partner used the criteria set forth in the 2013 version of the Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based upon this assessment, our General Partner concluded that, as of December 31, ~~2015~~2016, our internal control over financial reporting is effective.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management's report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street and Consumer Protection Act, which exempted smaller reporting companies from the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our fourth quarter ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

(Back to Index)

2830

(Back to Index)

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

We do not have any officers, directors or employees. Rather, our General Partner manages our activities and supervises our Real Estate Investments using its affiliates under the provisions of our Limited Partnership Agreement which governs its conduct. Officers of our General Partner and its affiliates may spend a substantial amount of time managing its business and affairs and may face a conflict regarding the allocation of their time between our business and affairs and their other business interests.

Directors and Executive Officers of Our General Partner

The following table sets forth information with respect to the executive officers, directors and key personnel of our General Partner:

NAME	AGE	POSITION OR OFFICE
Jonathan Z. Cohen	45	Director
Jeffrey P. Cohen	48	Director and Chief Executive Officer
Alan F. Feldman	52	Director and Senior Vice President
Kevin M. Finkel	45	Director and President
David E. Bloom	51	Director and Senior Vice President
Alan F. Feldman	53	Director and Senior Vice President
Kevin M. Finkel	44	President
David E. Bloom	52	Director and Vice President
Steven R. Saltzman	5253	Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer
Darshan V. Patel	4546	Chief Legal Officer and Assistant Secretary
Michael Yecies	48	Secretary
Shelle Weisbaum	49	Vice President and Secretary
Lawrence S. Block	50	Vice President and Assistant Secretary

~~Jonathan~~Jeffrey ZP. Cohen, ~~a Director since 2002. Mr. Cohen also~~ has served as ~~Chairman and~~ a Director ~~of Resource Real Estate Management since 2005~~ and as Chief Executive Officer, ~~President and a Director~~ of ~~Resource~~the ~~Capital~~General ~~Corp.,~~Partner ~~(NYSE: RSO), a real estate investment trust managed by Resource America,~~ since ~~its~~September ~~formation in 2005~~2016. Mr. Cohen has ~~been~~served ~~President~~as ~~since 2003 and Chief~~ Executive ~~Officer~~Vice ~~since~~President ~~2004~~ of Resource America ~~and~~since ~~also~~September ~~has served as Chairman and a Director of Resource Financial Institutions Group, Inc~~2016., ~~a subsidiary of Resource America, since 2005~~Mr. He Cohen has ~~been~~served ~~the~~as an Executive ~~Vice~~Managing ~~Chairman~~Director of ~~the~~C-III ~~Board~~Capital ~~of Directors of Atlas Growth~~ Partners ~~GP,~~ LLC, ~~the~~since ~~general~~January ~~partner~~2011 ofand ~~Atlas~~has ~~Growth~~primary ~~Partners,~~responsibility ~~L.P.,~~for anits ~~emerging~~mergers ~~growth~~and ~~company~~acquisitions inactivity ~~the~~and ~~oil~~previously ~~and~~served ~~natural~~as ~~gas~~President ~~industry,~~from ~~since~~February ~~its~~2010 ~~inception~~to inJanuary ~~2013~~2011. Mr. Cohen has also served as the ~~Executive~~President ~~Chairman~~ of Island ~~the~~Capital ~~Board of Directors of Atlas Energy~~ Group, ~~LLC (NYSE: ATLS)~~ since ~~February~~September ~~2015,~~2006 and ~~before that was Vice Chairman from February 2012. Mr. Cohen~~ has ~~served~~been asa ~~Executive~~principal ~~Vice Chairman~~ of ~~Atlas~~Island ~~Resource~~Capital ~~Partners,~~Group ~~L.P.~~since ~~(NYSE:~~it ~~ARP)~~was ~~since~~established ~~August~~in ~~2015~~2003. ~~Mr. Cohen~~Prior ~~served~~to asjoining ~~Executive~~Island ~~Chairman~~Capital ofGroup ~~the~~in ~~Board of Atlas Energy~~2003, LMr.~~P.’s~~ ~~general~~Cohen ~~partner~~was ~~inform~~an ~~January~~Executive ~~2012~~Vice ~~until~~President ~~the~~of ~~Atlas~~Insignia ~~Energy~~Financial ~~Merger~~Group infrom ~~February~~1997 ~~2015~~to 2003. Before ~~that~~joining Insignia, heMr. Cohen served as ~~Chairman~~a ofcorporate attorney with the ~~Board~~New ofYork ~~Atlas~~City ~~Energy’s~~law ~~general~~firm ~~partner~~of ~~from~~Rogers ~~February~~& ~~2011~~Wells ~~until~~(now ~~January~~Clifford ~~2012~~Chance) ~~and~~from as1993 ~~Vice~~to ~~Chairman~~1997 ofwhere ~~the~~he ~~Board~~primarily ofworked ~~its~~on ~~general~~matters ~~partner~~relating ~~from~~to ~~its~~mergers ~~formation~~and inacquisitions, ~~January~~capital ~~2006~~markets, ~~until~~and ~~February~~corporate ~~2011~~finance. Mr. Cohen ~~served~~is asa ~~the~~Trustee ~~chairman~~ of ~~the~~Dean ~~executive~~College ~~committee~~in ofFranklin, ~~Atlas~~MA ~~Energy’s~~and ~~general~~serves ~~partner~~on ~~from~~its ~~2006~~Executive ~~until~~Committee ~~the~~and ~~Atlas~~Investment ~~Energy Merger in February 2015~~Committee. Mr. Cohen ~~was~~brings ~~the~~to ~~Vice Chairman of~~ the ~~Board~~board of ~~Atlas~~directors ~~Energy,~~extensive ~~Inc.~~industry ~~from~~experience ~~its~~and ~~incorporation~~strategic inplanning, ~~September~~executive ~~2000~~management ~~until~~and ~~February~~financing ~~2011~~experience. ~~Mr.~~In ~~Cohen~~addition, ~~was~~ the ~~Executive Vice Chair of the managing~~ board of ~~Atlas~~directors ~~Pipeline~~will ~~Partners~~benefit ~~GP, LLC~~ from ~~its formation in 1999 until February 2015. Mr. Cohen was~~ the ~~Vice~~depth ~~Chairman~~and ofbreadth ~~the Board~~ of ~~Atlas~~his ~~Energy~~experience ~~Resources~~in investments, ~~LLC~~mergers and ~~its~~acquisitions ~~manager,~~and ~~Atlas~~corporate ~~Energy~~finance ~~Management,~~as ~~Inc.,~~well ~~from~~as ~~their~~his ~~formation~~understanding inof ~~June~~complex ~~2006~~financial ~~until February 2011~~transactions.

~~Alan~~Kevin FM. ~~Feldman,~~Finkel ~~a Director and Senior Vice President since 2004. Mr. Feldman also~~ has served as ~~Chief Executive Officer of Resource Real Estate, a subsidiary of Resource America, since 2004,~~ President ~~and a Director~~ of ~~Resource~~the ~~Real~~General ~~Estate~~Partner ~~Management~~ since ~~2005~~2006 and a Senior Vice President of ~~Resource~~the ~~America~~General ~~since~~Partner ~~2002. Mr. Feldman was President of Resource Properties, a subsidiary of Resource America,~~ from ~~2002~~2003 to ~~2005~~2006. ~~From~~ Mr. ~~1998~~Finkel toalso ~~2002,~~has ~~Mr.~~served ~~Feldman~~as ~~was~~Executive a Vice President atsince ~~Lazard~~2008 ~~Freres~~and &Director ~~Co.,~~of anAcquisitions ~~investment~~since ~~banking~~2004 ~~firm,~~of ~~specializing~~Resource inReal ~~real estate mergers and acquisitions~~Estate, ~~asset and portfolio sales and recapitalization. From 1992 through 1998 Mr. Feldman was an Executive~~ Vice President of ~~the~~Resource ~~Pennsylvania~~America ~~Real~~from ~~Estate~~2006 ~~Investment~~through ~~Trust~~2013, and ~~its~~Senior ~~predecessor,~~Vice ~~The~~President ~~Rubin Organization, where he was responsible for the firm’s 20 million square feet~~ of ~~managed~~Resource ~~retail~~America ~~properties. From~~since ~~1990 to 1992~~ 2013. Mr. ~~Feldman~~Finkel ~~was~~joined aResource ~~Director~~America atin ~~Strouse, Greenberg & Co~~2002., Prior ato ~~regional~~joining ~~full~~Resource ~~service real estate company. From 1986 through 1988~~America, Mr. ~~Feldman~~Finkel was an ~~engineer~~investment banker at ~~Squibb~~Barclays ~~Corporation. Mr.~~Capital ~~Feldman’s~~from ~~extensive~~1998 ~~experience~~to 2000 and ~~knowledge~~at inDeutsche ~~the~~Bank ~~real~~Securities ~~estate~~from ~~business~~1994 ~~is an asset~~ to ~~our General Partner’s board~~1998.

~~David~~Alan EF. ~~Bloom,~~Feldman ahas ~~Director~~served ~~since~~as ~~2002,~~a ~~President~~Director ~~from 2002 to 2006~~ and Senior Vice President of the General Partner since ~~2006~~2004. Mr. ~~Bloom~~Feldman also has served as Chief Executive Officer of Resource Real Estate, a subsidiary of Resource America, since 2004, President and a Director of Resource Real Estate Management since ~~2004,~~2005 and as a Senior Vice President of Resource America, ~~a position he has held~~ since ~~September 2001~~2002. Mr. ~~Bloom~~Feldman ~~joined~~was President of Resource ~~America~~Properties, ~~from~~a ~~Colony~~subsidiary ~~Capital,~~of ~~LLC~~Resource America, afrom ~~Los~~2002 ~~Angeles-based~~to ~~real~~2005. From ~~estate~~1998 ~~fund~~to 2002, ~~where~~Mr. heFeldman was a ~~Senior~~ Vice President asat ~~well~~Lazard asFreres a& ~~Principal~~Co., ofan ~~Colony~~investment ~~Capital~~banking ~~Asia~~firm, ~~Pacific~~specializing ~~from~~in ~~1999~~real toestate ~~2001~~mergers and acquisitions, asset and portfolio sales and recapitalization. ~~While~~ From at1992 ~~Colony~~through 1998, Mr. ~~Bloom~~Feldman was ~~responsible~~an ~~for~~Executive Vice President of the ~~identification,~~Pennsylvania ~~evaluation~~Real Estate Investment Trust and ~~consummation~~its ofpredecessor, ~~new~~The ~~investments~~Rubin Organization, ~~and~~where he ~~actively~~was ~~participated~~responsible infor the firm’s ~~equity~~20 ~~and~~million ~~debt~~square ~~raising~~feet ~~efforts~~of managed retail properties. From ~~1998~~1990 to ~~1999~~1992, Mr. ~~Bloom~~Feldman was a Director at ~~Sonnenblick-~~Strouse, Greenberg & Co., a regional full service real estate company. From 1986 through 1988, Mr. Feldman was an engineer at Squibb Corporation. Mr. Feldman’s extensive experience and knowledge in the real estate business is an asset to our General Partner’s board.

David E. Bloom has served as Senior Vice President of the General Partner since July 2015. Mr. Bloom has served as President and as a director of Resource Real Estate since May 2004, and as Senior Vice President of RAI, a position he has held since September 2001. Mr. Bloom joined RAI from Colony Capital, LLC, a real estate private equity fund manager, where he was a Senior Vice President, as well as a Principal of Colony Capital Asia Pacific from 1998 to 2002. From 1998 to 1999, Mr.

(Back to Index)

2931

(Back to Index)

Bloom was a director at Sonnenblick-Goldman Company, a New York based real estate investment bank. From ~~1992~~1993 to 1998, Mr. Bloom practiced law in the real estate and corporate departments of Wilkie Farr & Gallagher in New York and Drinker Biddle & Reath in Philadelphia. Prior to practicing law, Mr. Bloom began his real estate career in 1987 as an Acquisitions and Development Associate with Strouse, Greenberg & Company, a regional full-service real estate company. ~~Mr.~~ ~~Bloom’s extensive experience and knowledge in the real estate business is an asset to our General Partner’s board.~~

~~Kevin~~Steven MR. ~~Finkel,~~Saltzman has served as Vice President ~~since~~of ~~2006~~Finance and ~~Senior~~Chief ~~Vice~~Financial ~~President~~and ~~from~~Accounting ~~2003~~Officer toof ~~2006~~the General Partner since August 2003. Mr. ~~Finkel~~Saltzman also has served as ~~Executive~~ Vice President ~~since 2008~~ and ~~Director~~Controller of ~~Acquisitions~~Resource Real Estate since 2004 and Vice President of Finance of Resource Real Estate, ~~Vice~~Management ~~President~~since of2006. From ~~Resource~~1999 ~~America~~to ~~from~~2003, ~~2006~~Mr. ~~till~~Saltzman ~~2013~~was Controller at WP Realty, ~~and~~Inc., ~~Senior~~a ~~Vice~~regional ~~President~~developer ofand ~~Resource~~property ~~America~~manager ~~since~~specializing ~~2013~~in community shopping centers. Mr. ~~Finkel~~Saltzman ~~joined~~began ~~Resource~~his ~~America~~real estate career in ~~2002. Prior~~1988 toas ~~joining~~a ~~Resource~~Property ~~America~~Controller at The Rubin Organization, ~~Mr.~~a ~~Finkel~~predecessor ~~was~~to anthe ~~investment~~Pennsylvania ~~banker~~Real atEstate ~~Barclays~~Investment ~~Capital~~Trust. Mr. ~~from~~Saltzman ~~1998~~began tohis ~~2000~~professional ~~and~~career at ~~Deutsche~~Price ~~Bank~~Waterhouse ~~Securities~~ from ~~1994~~1985 to ~~1998~~1988.

~~Steven~~Darshan RV. ~~Saltzman,~~Patel ~~Vice~~has ~~President~~served ofas ~~Finance~~Chief ~~and~~Compliance ~~Chief~~Officer ~~Financial~~of ~~and~~the ~~Accounting~~General ~~Officer~~Partner since ~~August 2003~~2002. Mr. ~~Saltzman~~Patel also has served as Vice President ~~and Controller~~ of Resource ~~Real~~America ~~Estate~~ since ~~2004~~2005 and ~~Vice~~Associate ~~President~~General ofCounsel ~~Finance~~for of Resource ~~Real~~America ~~Estate Management~~ since ~~2006~~2001. From ~~1999~~1998 to ~~2003~~2001, Mr. ~~Saltzman~~Patel was ~~Controller~~associated atwith WPthe ~~Realty,~~law ~~Inc.,~~firm aof ~~regional~~Berman, ~~developer~~Paley, ~~and~~Goldstein ~~property~~& ~~manager~~Kannry ~~specializing~~practicing incommercial ~~community~~litigation ~~shopping~~and ~~centers. Mr. Saltzman began his~~ real estate ~~career~~law. From in1996 ~~1988~~to as1998, aMr. ~~Property~~Patel ~~Controller~~was atassociated ~~The~~with ~~Rubin Organization, a predecessor to~~ the ~~Pennsylvania~~law ~~Real~~firm ~~Estate~~of ~~Investment~~Glynn ~~Trust. Mr.~~& ~~Saltzman~~Associates ~~began~~practicing ~~his~~litigation ~~professional~~and ~~career~~real atestate ~~Price Waterhouse from 1985 to 1988~~law.

~~Darshan~~Shelle V.Weisbaum ~~Patel,~~has ~~Chief~~served ~~Compliance~~as ~~Officer~~Vice President and Secretary of the General Partner since ~~2002~~September 2016. Mr Ms. ~~Patel~~Weisbaum ~~also~~ has also served as Senior Vice President, ofsince ~~Resource~~January ~~America~~2014, ~~since~~and ~~2005~~General Counsel and ~~Associate~~Secretary, ~~General~~since ~~Counsel~~August ~~for~~2007, of Resource ~~America~~Real ~~since 2001~~Estate. ~~From~~Previously ~~1998~~she held the position of Vice President of Resource Real Estate from August 2007 to ~~2001,~~December Mr2013. She ~~Patel~~has ~~was~~also ~~associated~~served ~~with~~as ~~the~~Vice ~~law~~President ~~firm~~and Secretary of ~~Berman~~Resource Real Estate Management, ~~Paley~~LLC since August 2007. Ms. Weisbaum joined Resource Real Estate in October 2006 from Ledgewood Law, ~~Goldstein~~a &Philadelphia-based ~~Kannry~~law ~~practicing~~firm, ~~commercial~~where ~~litigation~~she ~~and~~practiced commercial real estate law~~. From~~ ~~1996~~from 1998 to ~~1998,~~2006 ~~Mr.~~as ~~Patel~~an ~~was~~associate ~~associated~~and ~~with~~later ~~the~~as ~~law~~a ~~firm~~partner of ~~Glynn~~the &firm. ~~Associates~~Prior ~~practicing~~to ~~litigation~~Ledgewood, from 1987 to 1998, Ms. Weisbaum was Vice President and ~~real~~Assistant ~~estate~~General ~~law~~Counsel at the Philadelphia Stock Exchange.

~~Michael~~Lawrence S. ~~Yecies,~~Block ~~Senior~~has served as Vice President, ~~Chief~~and ~~Legal~~Assistant ~~Officer~~Secretary ~~and~~of ~~Secretary~~the General Partner since ~~1998~~September 2016. Mr. ~~Yecies~~Block has served as ~~Senior~~SVP ~~Vice~~& ~~President~~Assistant Secretary of Resource America since ~~2005~~September 2016. Since January, ~~Vice~~2011, ~~President~~Mr. ~~from~~Block ~~1998~~has tobeen ~~2005~~a Managing Director, Counsel and ~~Senior~~Chief ~~Vice~~Compliance ~~President~~Officer for Island Capital Group LLC, ~~Chief~~a ~~Legal~~real ~~Officer~~estate merchant banking firm; Managing Director, Counsel and ~~Secretary~~Chief ofCompliance ~~Resource~~Officer for C-III Capital ~~Corp.~~Partners ~~since~~LLC and its ~~inception~~affiliates, inincluding ~~2005.~~C-III MrInvestment ~~Yecies~~Management ~~previously~~LLC, ~~served~~an asSEC-registered ~~Chief~~investment ~~Legal~~adviser; ~~Officer~~and President and ~~Secretary~~Chief Compliance Officer of ~~Atlas~~Anubis ~~Energy~~Securities LLC, ~~Inc~~a registered broker-dealer. From March 2005 through January 2011, Mr. Block was Executive Vice President, General Counsel and ~~Atlas~~Chief ~~Pipeline~~Compliance ~~Partners~~Officer GPfor The Kenmar Group, ~~LLC~~an ~~since~~alternative ~~their~~investment ~~inception~~firm. From January 1998 through ~~their~~March ~~initial~~2005, ~~public~~Mr. ~~offerings~~Block was Managing Director, General Counsel and ~~subsequent~~Chief ~~spin-offs~~Compliance ~~from~~Officer ~~Resource~~for ~~America~~Lipper & Company L.P., ~~Michael~~an alternative investment firm. Mr. Block was ana ~~attorney~~senior inassociate at the ~~Corporate~~law ~~and~~firm ~~Special~~Cadwalader, ~~Litigation~~Wickersham ~~Departments~~& atTaft ~~Duane~~in ~~Morris~~New ~~LLP~~York (from 1996 through 1998 and an ~~international~~associate at the law firm) Proskauer Rose LLP from ~~1994~~1992 to ~~1998~~1996.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

Because we do not directly employ any persons, we rely on a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics adopted by Resource America that applies to the principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer of our General Partner, as well as to persons performing services for us generally. You may obtain a copy of this code of ethics by a request to our General Partner, Resource Capital Partners, at One Crescent Drive, Suite 203, Navy Yard Corporate Center, Philadelphia, PA 19112.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

Neither we nor our General Partner’s Board of ~~Director~~Directors has a standing audit committee; our General Partner’s entire Board of Directors acts as the audit committee. Our General Partner’s Board of Directors does not currently have any member who qualifies as an audit committee financial expert. We believe that the cost related to retaining such a financial expert at this time is prohibitive for a small entity such as ours, and that it would reduce amounts otherwise distributable to our limited partners.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which we refer to as the Exchange Act, requires the directors and executive officers of our General Partner, our General Partner, and holders of greater than 10% of our limited partnership interests to file reports with the SEC. SEC regulations require us to identify anyone who filed a required report late during the most recent fiscal year. Based on our review of these reports, we believe that the filing requirements for all of these reporting persons were complied with during ~~2015~~2016.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

We have no directors or officers, and we do not directly employ any persons to manage or operate our business. Our affairs are managed by our General Partner and its affiliates. As compensation for its services, we pay our General Partner various fees as set forth in Item 13.

(Back to Index)

3032

(Back to Index)

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND

MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth the number and percentage of our limited partnership interests owned by beneficial owners of 5% or more of our limited partnership interests as well as the beneficial ownership of our General Partner, and its officers and directors, as of ~~April 1~~March 28, ~~2013~~2017. Under the terms of the Partnership Agreement, our affairs are managed by our General Partner. We do not have any officers or directors. This information is reported in accordance with the beneficial ownership rules of the SEC under which a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of a security if that person has or shares voting power or investment power with respect to such security or has the right to acquire such ownership within 60 days.

Title of Class	Name and address of beneficial owner (1)	Amount and nature of beneficial ownership (2)	Percent of Class
Units of limited partnership interest	Resource Capital Partners, Inc.	205,578	5.55%
Units of limited partnership interest	~~Jonathan~~Jeffrey ZP. Cohen, ~~Chairman~~Chief ofExecutive ~~the~~Officer ~~Board~~and Director	−	−
	Alan F. Feldman, Senior Vice President and Director	967	Less than 0.01%
	Kevin M. Finkel, President and Director	−	−
	Kevin M. Finkel, President	−	−
	Alan F. Feldman, Senior Vice President and Director	967	Less than 1%
	Steven R. Saltzman, Vice President - Finance	−	−
	David E. Bloom, Vice President and Director	−	−
	David E. Bloom, Senior Vice President and Director	−	−
	Steven R. Saltzman, Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer	−	−
	Darshan V. Patel, Chief Legal Officer and Assistant Secretary	−	−
	Michael S. Yecies, Secretary	−	−
	Lawrence S. Block, Vice President & Assistant Secretary	−	−
	All directors and executive officers as a group	967	Less than 0.01%
	Shelle Weisbaum, Vice President & Secretary	−	−
	All directors and executive officers as a group	967	Less than 1%


(1)	The address for each beneficial owner is One Crescent Drive, Suite 203, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19112.


(2)	Beneficial ownership of directors and officers excludes amounts that may be attributable to them as a result of the units beneficially owned by Resource Capital Partners.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS,

AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

We pay our General Partner and its affiliates the following fees for their services.:

Property Management Fees

We pay Resource Real Estate Management, an affiliate of our General Partner, a monthly property management fee in an amount equal to 5% of our gross cash receipts from the operation of our Properties. This fee is for Resource Real Estate Management’s services in managing the Properties or obtaining and supervising subcontractor Property managers, which may be affiliates of Resource Real Estate Management or independent third-parties. Resource Real Estate Management is permitted to manage the Properties through a property management affiliate or subcontract the management of the Properties to unaffiliated third-party subcontractors. If Resource Real Estate Management subcontracts the management of the Properties, then it will pay all management fees payable to the subcontractor managers of our Properties. For the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, Resource Real Estate Management earned $~~501~~249,000 and $~~492~~501,000 respectively, in real estate property management fees.

Real Estate Debt Management Fees

We also pay Resource Real Estate Management a monthly real estate debt management fee equal to 0.167% (2% per annum) of the gross offering proceeds that have been, and continue to be, deployed in Real Estate Debt Investments. This fee is for Resource Real Estate Management’s services in monitoring the performance of our Real Estate Debt Investments, including:


•	the collection of amounts owed to us;

• reviewing on an as-needed basis the underlying multifamily residential rental properties serving, directly or indirectly, as collateral for the Real Estate Debt Investments and the owners of those properties, and the markets in general, to identify any potential problem loans; and

• determining whether or when to sell a Real Estate Debt Investment.

(Back to Index)

3133

(Back to Index)

~~Resource~~• ~~Real~~reviewing ~~Estate~~on ~~Management~~an ~~earned~~as-needed ~~$50~~basis the underlying multifamily residential rental properties serving,~~000~~ ~~and~~directly ~~$41~~or indirectly,~~000~~ inas ~~real~~collateral ~~estate~~for ~~debt~~the ~~management~~Real ~~fees~~Estate ~~during~~Debt ~~each~~Investments ofand the ~~years~~owners ~~ended~~of ~~December 31~~those properties, ~~2015~~ and ~~2014~~the markets in general, ~~respectively.~~to identify any potential problem loans; and


•	determining whether or when to sell a Real Estate Debt Investment.

Resource Real Estate Management earned $31,000 and $50,000 in real estate debt management fees during each of the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Deferral of Property and Real Estate Debt Management Fees

We pay Resource Real Estate Management or its affiliates the real estate management fees for our Real Estate Investments from our operating revenues and our General Partner may, in its discretion, from time to time defer payment of all or any portion of such fees related to our Real Estate Investments, and accrue the same, if it deems our operating revenues are insufficient to pay such fees and still satisfy our investment objectives. We will pay any deferred fees to Resource Real Estate Management when our General Partner deems our operating revenues are sufficient to make such payment. As of December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, no fees had been deferred.

Investment Management Fees

We pay our General Partner or its affiliates an annual investment management fee payable from our revenues in an amount equal to 1% of the gross offering proceeds that have been deployed in real estate investments from the offering that have been, and continue to be, deployed in Real Estate Investments. The investment management fee is for our General Partner’s professional services rendered in our administration, including, but not limited to, the preparation and distribution of our required quarterly and annual reports to our limited partners. Since the annual investment management fee is for our General Partner’s professional services, it is in addition to the reimbursements we pay our General Partner for certain administrative expenses that it and its affiliates incur on our behalf as described below in “Reimbursement of Administrative Expenses and Direct Costs.” Up to 100% of our General Partner’s annual investment management fee is subordinated to our limited partners’ receipt of their Preferred Return. Our General Partner is entitled at any time to an additional share of our cash distributions to recoup any investment management fees or distributions that were previously subordinated to the extent that our cash distributions to our limited partners exceeded their Preferred Return. Our General Partner earned $~~329~~163,000 and $~~339~~329,000 in investment management fees, ~~the payment of which was deferred under the subordination clause of the Partnership Agreement~~ during ~~each of~~ the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, respectively.

Property Financing Fee for Refinancing a Property

We pay our General Partner or its affiliates a property financing fee equal to 0.5% of the face amount of any refinancing we obtain for our interest in the Properties. This fee is for our General Partner’s or its affiliates’ services in obtaining the financing and negotiating its terms. The property financing fee for refinancing will not be paid for Real Estate Debt Investments. There were no refinancings of the Properties during the years ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015, and, accordingly, no fees were paid.

Cash Distributions to Our General Partner

Our General Partner will receive distributions from us from the following sources:


•	distributable cash from operations;


•	distributable cash from capital transactions; and


•	cash distributions to the partners upon our liquidation.

Cash distributions from our operations will be first paid to our limited partners until they have received distributions totaling their Preferred Return and, thereafter, 80% to our limited partners and 20% to our General Partner.

Cash distributions from capital transactions, which include cash we receive from the sale or refinancing of a Property or the sale or repayment in full of all outstanding principal and interest due and owing to us on a Real Estate Debt Investment, are distributed in the following order:


•	first, 100% to our limited partners until they receive distributions, including distributions of distributable cash from operations totaling their Preferred Return;


•	second, 100% to our limited partners until their respective adjusted capital contributions (amount originally paid for a limited partnership interest less previous distributions of distributable cash from capital transactions) have been reduced to zero; and


•	thereafter, 80% to our limited partners and 20% to our General Partner.

When we dissolve and liquidate, we will distribute the liquidation proceeds in the following order of priority:

• first, to the payment of our creditors in the order of priority provided by law, except obligations to partners or their affiliates;

(Back to Index)

3234

(Back to Index)

When we dissolve and liquidate, we will distribute the liquidation proceeds in the following order of priority:


•	first, to the payment of our creditors in the order of priority provided by law, except obligations to partners or their affiliates;


•	next, to establish any reserve that our General Partner (or any other person effecting the winding up) determines is reasonably necessary for any contingent or unforeseen liability or obligation;

•

next, to the payment of all unpaid fees (other than our General Partner’s right to reimbursement of any fees previously subordinated to distributions to our limited partners) and other obligations owed by us to our General Partner and its affiliates (other than expense reimbursements), such as loans to us, in proportion to, and to the extent of, the unpaid fees, advances and other obligations to our General Partner and its affiliates under the Partnership Agreement;


•	next, to the payment of all expense reimbursements (other than our General Partner’s right to reimbursement of any fees previously subordinated to distributions to our limited partners) to which our General Partner or its affiliates may be entitled under the Partnership Agreement;


•	next, to the partners in proportion to, and to the extent of, the positive balances of their capital accounts;


•	next, 100% to our limited partners until they have received their respective Preferred Returns;


•	next, to our General Partner as reimbursement for any fees previously subordinated to distributions to our limited partners; and


•	thereafter, 80% to our limited partners and 20% to our General Partner.

Director Independence

Because we are not listed on any national securities exchange or inter-dealer quotation system, we have elected to use the NASDAQ National Stock Market’s definition of “independent director” in evaluating whether any of our General Partner’s directors are independent. Under this definition, the board of directors of our General Partner has determined that our General Partner does not have any independent directors, nor are we required to have any.

Parent Entities

See Item 1, “Business - General

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Audit Fees. The aggregate fees billed by our independent auditors, Grant Thornton LLP for the period ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 for professional services rendered was $~~128~~159,~~806~~870 and $~~103~~128,~~829~~806, respectively.

Audit-Related Fees. We did not incur any audit-related fees from Grant Thornton LLP during ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015.

Tax Fees. We did not incur any fees for tax services from Grant Thornton LLP during ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015.

All Other Fees. We did not incur any other fees from Grant Thornton LLP during ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015.

Procedures for Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditor. As a limited partnership, we do not have an audit committee. Our General Partner’s ~~Board~~board of ~~Directors~~directors, acting as a committee of the whole, reviews and approves in advance any audit and any permissible non-audit engagement or relationship between us and our independent auditors.

(Back to Index)

3335

(Back to Index)

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES


(a)	The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:


1.	Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 Consolidated Statement of Changes in Partners’ Capital for the Years Ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, ~~2015~~2016 and ~~2014~~2015 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements - December 31, ~~2015~~2016


2.	Financial Statement Schedules

i. Schedule IIIII -Investments ~~Valuation~~in ~~and~~Real ~~Qualifying Accounts~~Estate

ii. Schedule ~~III~~IV - Investments in Mortgage Loans on Real Estate

iii. Schedule IV - Investments in Mortgage Loans on Real Estate



Exhibit No.		Description
3.1		Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership. ⁽¹⁾
3.2		Certificate of Limited Partnership. ⁽¹⁾
4.1		Forms of letters sent to limited partners confirming their investment. ⁽¹⁾
10.1		Agreement of Purchase and Sale - Casco Bay Portfolio ⁽²⁾
10.2		Agreement of Purchase and Sale - Memorial Towers ⁽²⁾
10.3		Agreement of Purchase and Sale - Villas of Henderson
31.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 1350 18 U.S.C., as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 1350 18 U.S.C., as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.1		Interactive Data Files

Exhibit No.		Description
3.1		Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership. (1)
3.2		Certificate of Limited Partnership. (1)
4.1		Forms of letters sent to limited partners confirming their investment. (1)
10.1		Agreement of Sale - Casco Bay Portfolio
10.2		Agreement of Sale-Memorial Towers
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 1350 18 U.S.C., as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
32.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 1350 18 U.S.C., as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101.1		The following information from the Partnership's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations; (iii) Consolidated Statement of Changes in Partners' Capital; and (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

_______________


(1)	Filed previously as an exhibit to the Partnership’s registration statement on Form 10 for the year ended December 31, 2008 and by this reference incorporated herein.


(2)	Incorporated by reference to the Partnership's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 29, 2016.

(Back to Index)

3436

(Back to Index)

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

	RESOURCE REAL ESTATE INVESTORS 6, L.P.
	By: Resource Capital Partners, Inc., its general partner
March 29, 2016	By: /s/ Kevin M. Finkel
March 28, 2017	By: /s/ Kevin M. Finkel
	Kevin M. Finkel
	President
	(Principal Executive Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

/s/ Jonathan Z. Cohen	Director	March 29, 2016
/s/ Jeffrey P. Cohen	Director and Chief Executive Officer	March 28, 2017
JONATHAN Z. COHEN
JEFFREY P. COHEN
/s/ Alan F. Feldman	Director and Senior Vice President	March 2928, ~~2016~~2017
ALAN F. FELDMAN
/s/ David E. Bloom	Director and ~~Senior~~ Vice President	March 2928, ~~2016~~2017
DAVID E. BLOOM
/s/ Kevin M. Finkel	Director and President	March 2928, ~~2016~~2017
KEVIN M. FINKEL	(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ Steven R. Saltzman	Vice President -of Finance and Chief Financial and Accounting Officer	March 2928, ~~2016~~2017
STEVEN R. SALTZMAN	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

(Back to Index)

3537

(Back to Index)

Resource Real Estate Investors 6, L.P.

SCHEDULE III

Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation

December 31, ~~2015~~2016

(dollars in thousands)

Column A	Column B		Column C		Column D		Column E		Column F			Column G	Column H	Column I
Description	Encumbrances		Initial cost to Company		Cost capitalized subsequent to acquisition		Gross amount at which carried at close of period		Accumulated depreciation			Date of construction	Date acquired	Life on which depreciation in latest income is computed
			Buildings and land improvements		Improvements carrying costs		Buildings and land improvements total
Real estate owned:
Residential	$9,849	~~7,109~~	915,~~561~~329		$2,196	~~1,685~~	$17,525	~~11,246~~	$(5,628	~~(3,319~~	)	~~1969~~1984	122/1829/~~2007~~2008	3 - 27.5 years
Houston, TX
Residential	10,375		13,726		1,239		14,965		(4,737		)	1985	12/27/2007	3 - 27.5 years
San Antonio, TX
Residential	10,015		15,329		2,168		17,497		(5,044		)	1984	2/29/2008	3 - 27.5 years
	$	9,849	$	15,329	$	2,196	$	17,525	$	(5,628	)
San Antonio, TX
	$	27,499	$	38,616	$	5,092	$	43,708	$	(13,100	)

	Years Ended
	December 31, 2015
	December 31, 2016
	2015		2014
	2016		2015
Balance at the beginning of the period	6943,~~662~~708		69,~~572~~662
Additions during period:
Improvements, etc.	~~437~~121		~~320~~437
Deductions during period:
Disposals	(26,~~391~~304	)	(~~230~~26,391	)
Balance at close of period	4317,~~708~~525		6943,~~662~~708

(Back to Index)

3638

(Back to Index)

Resource Real Estate Investors 6, L.P.

SCHEDULE IV

Loans Held for Investment

December 31, ~~2015~~2016

(in thousands)

Column A	Column B	Column C	Column D	Column E	Column F		Column G		Column H
Description	Interest rate	Final maturity date	Periodic payment term	Prior liens	Face amount of mortgages		Carrying amount of mortgages		Principal amount of loans subject to delinquent principal or interest
Multi-family unit, San Bernardino, CA	Fixed interest rate of 10.27%	8/11/2016	—	n/a	$	2,000	$	—	$	2,000
Multi-family unit, San Bernardino, CA	Fixed interest rate of 10.27%	8/11/2016	—	n/a	$	400	$	—	$	400
Multi-family unit, Las Vegas, NV	Fixed interest rate of 12.75%	5/8/2017	—	n/a	500		—		500
					$	~~2,900~~500	$	—	$	2,500

(Back to Index)

3739

Filing Compare · Resource Real Estate Investors 6 LP