UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)


	x	ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015


	¨	TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________ to ________

Commission File Number 333-169887

DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Nevada	27-2689205
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or organization)	(IRS Employer Identification Number)


12502 W. Atlantic Blvd, Coral Springs, FL	33071
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)


Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:	(954) 509-0911

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:


	Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
	None	None

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:

Common stock, $0.001 par value

(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):


Large accelerated filer ¨		Accelerated filer ¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter: $1,~~208~~366,~~560~~060.

As of ~~April~~May 135, ~~2015~~2016 there were ~~415~~435,961,936 shares of common stock. As of ~~April~~May 135, ~~2015~~2016, based upon records obtained from our transfer agent, there were 16 holders of record of our common stock. Our transfer agent records does not account for other holders of our common stock that are held in street name or by broker dealers as custodian for individual holders of our stock.

INDEX

Part I		3
		Page
Item 1.	Business	3
Part I		1
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	8
Item 1.	Business	1
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	11
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	6
Item 2.	Properties	12
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments	9
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	12
Item 2.	Properties	10
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	12
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings	10
Part II		12
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	10
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity; Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	12
Part II		10
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	13
Item 5.	Market for Registrant’s Common Equity; Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities	10
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	13
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data	11
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	18
Item 7.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	11
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	19
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	14
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	35
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	20
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	35
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure	31
Item 9B.	Other Information	36
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	31
Part III		36
Item 9B.	Other Information	32
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	36
Part III		32
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	38
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance	32
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	39
Item 11.	Executive Compensation	34
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	39
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters	35
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	40
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence	35
Part IV		40
Item 14.	Principal Accountant Fees and Services	36
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	40
Part IV		36
Signatures		41
Item 15.	Exhibits	36
Signatures		37

DMH International and its wholly owned subsidiaries, Touch Medical Solutions, Inc. (“TMSI”) and Virtual Physicians Network ("“VPN"”) are referred to herein as “we”, “our” or “us” ( TMSI and VPN are also individually referred to herein).

Forward Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ending December 31, ~~2014~~2015 contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, most significantly, Item 7 (Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation), as well as assumptions that, if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The words or phrases "“would be,"” "“will allow, "“intends to,"” "“will likely result,"” "“are expected to,"” "“will continue,"” "“is anticipated,"” "“estimate,"” "“project,"” or similar expressions are intended to identify "“forward-looking statements.” All statements other than statements of historical fact, are statements that could be deemed forward-looking statements, including any projections of revenue, gross margin, expenses, earnings or losses from operations, synergies or other financial items; any statements of the plans, strategies and objectives of management for future operations; and any statement concerning developments, plans, or performance. Unless otherwise required by applicable law, we do not undertake and we specifically disclaim any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences, developments, unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statement.

PART I

Item 1. Business

Introduction

The Company was incorporated in the state of Nevada on June 2, 2010. In December 2012, we entered into a share exchange agreement with Touch Medical Solutions, Inc. (TMSI), whereby we assumed TMSI’s business operations. On July 22, 2014, we acquired all of the outstanding shares of Virtual Physician’s Network, which was merged into the Company and became our wholly owned subsidiary.

We are currently in the business of developing and bringing to market a suite of medical software products. Our principal executive offices are located at ~~12502~~12538 West Atlantic Blvd., Coral Springs, Florida.

We have never been the subject of a bankruptcy, receivership or similar proceeding. Additionally, apart from the merger discussed herein, we have never been the subject of a material reclassification, merger, consolidation, or purchase or sale of a significant amount of assets not in the ordinary course of business.

Operations

The operations refer to our subsidiaries Touch Medical Solutions, Inc. (TMSI) and Virtual Physician'’s Network (VPN).

Operating Strategy

Management is of the opinion that the leaders of the technology market as a whole are beating their competitors by presenting a more effective end user experience and fulfillment of base requirements. We believe that products were judged by the number of features they offer; however, there has been an increasing trend towards not providing the greatest number of features, but rather to provide a simpler user interface than its competitors combined with a solid product workflow. We will attempt, as a medical device provider, to offer products that are user friendly and which have a core workflow that clients can easily implement and use. We believe that a goal of applying our product ideas efficiently will allow our customers to maintain high medical standards to help them to grow in their own individual markets.

Virtual Physician'’s Network

There are over 100 million surgeries and procedures performed in the United States each year in over 6,000 hospitals and 5,000 surgery centers. These staggering figures combined with the archaic use of current technology to coordinate all these events between surgeons, institutions and medical vendors and their professional societies has created a chaotic, wasteful, and inefficient system.

Virtual Physician’s Network is a HIPAA compliant and private mobile and web based app solution specifically designed to help improve clinical and financial outcomes for all the stakeholders participating in these 100 million surgical events. These stakeholders include surgeons, hospitals, surgery centers, healthcare professionals, medical device/pharma vendors and medical associations and societies.

We currently provide the Virtual Physician’s Network solutions through the App Store (IOS devices) and Google Play (Droid devices) as well as a web based solution through our Virtual Physician’s Network website www.virtualphysiciansnetwork.com.

The adoption of the Virtual Physician’s Network technology ~~will~~is becurrently ~~initially~~being driven through ~~the~~ our beta group and key industry trade shows such as NASS (North American Spine Society) and AAOS (American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons). Further adoption will then be driven by sales representation from participating medical vendors.

Beta Launch

Because surgeons in their particular specialties such as Spine or Orthopedics have an incredibly strong industry influence on all the stakeholders in the healthcare space, Virtual Physician’s Network will focus their initial implementation and marketing efforts on surgeon adoption.

3We are currently in the process of rolling out the Virtual Physicians Network v 2.1 mobile and web based app technology to key industry thought leaders in the orthopedic spine and neurosurgical spine markets in the U.S. These initial beta users include but are not limited to groups in FL, CA, MI, WV, NV, and NJ. Upon the successful implementation of the beta release of Virtual Physicians Network v. 2.1, we anticipate additional adoption from the peers and colleagues of these key thought leaders.

~~We are currently in the process of rolling out the Virtual Physicians Network v~~ 1.1.0 mobile and web based app technology to key industry thought leaders in the orthopedic spine and neurosurgical spine markets in the U.S. These initial beta users include but are not limited to groups in FL, CA, MI, WV, NV, and NJ. Upon the successful implementation of the beta release of Virtual Physicians Network v. 1.0, we anticipate additional adoption from the peers and colleagues of these key thought leaders. Our beta launch is scheduled to be completed by the end of Q1 2015.

The Virtual Physician’s Network platform is designed to accommodate all surgical and procedural specialties. Our goal is to expand into general orthopedics and cardiology for all the associated stakeholders in ~~2015~~late 2016.

Surgeon members experience

We currently offer surgeon members five core practice building tools through the Virtual Physician’s Network as well as an interactive HIPAA compliant surgical calendar. These tools include: Book a Case, Contact My Rep, Education, Product Info, CME. The ~~latest~~ release for surgeons in Q4 of 2014 provided additional availability on IOS and Android phones in additional to iPads and Tablets.

Medical Vendor members experience

We currently offer medical vendors four core tools to help vendor reps streamline and effectively manage their communications and requests from their surgeon customers: Confirm a Case and My Messages, Education and Product Info. We completed the addition of Education and Product Info tools in Q4 of 2014.

Our technology gives vendor reps instant and secure communication with their customers for case booking and communication. This not only eliminates costly mistakes but also saves valuable time allowing them to work more efficiently. We also give the companies that they represent a compelling platform to promote new devices and techniques to their surgeon and hospital customers through marketing experiences in the app.

Virtual Physician’s Network will provide support and training to these organizations to effectively promote the use of their Virtual Physicians Network app ~~throughout the beta rollout in 2015~~.

Vendor Admin experience

We released the vendor admin experience in Q3 of 2015. This experience gives the customer service or senior management of any vendor the visibility of any cases that are scheduled but their sales force. It also gives them the ability to drive product information and education to anyone on their sales and admin team. The ability to have visibility to all of their customers requests in real time allows for more effective inventory management.

Healthcare Professional members experience

We ~~plan~~released ~~on releasing~~ our Healthcare Professional experience in v. 2.01 of the Virtual Physician’s Network mobile app in Q2Q3 of 2015. This experience ~~will~~has ~~have~~three ~~four~~ core tools for healthcare professionals to effectively be linked to the surgeons and vendors that are working in their hospitals and surgery centers. These tools include: My Cases, ~~My Messages,~~ Education and Product Info.

This gives all healthcare professionals that are involved in these surgical events the ability to instantly keep track of ~~and privately respond to~~ all requests and communications between their surgeons and vendors. It also provides them with an intuitive and quick reference to industry specific education and product information.

Professional Societies and Associations

Each year there are over 2,000 medical societies and associations that have an annual meeting. These industry meetings host large numbers of their membership and are sponsored by medical device and pharma companies. They typically include surgeons that are industry thought leaders as faculty for each meeting and focus on the latest techniques, procedures, treatments and technology most relevant to their specialties.

We plan on showcasing the Virtual Physician’s Network technology at many of these key meeting over the next 18 months. These industry meetings represent an excellent marketing opportunity for Virtual Physician’s Network to gain adoption from all of their targeted stakeholders who attend these events together.

Virtual Physician’s Network also provides these organizations with a more effective way to deliver Continuing Medical Education (CME) experiences, meeting information, and other educational experiences to their membership through the Virtual Physician’s Network app.

TouchPACS

With a growing PACS market and an emergent Electronic Medical Record (“EMR”) market, we plan to provide a technically advanced but cost effective combined solution to medical practices that have been largely ignored by existing vendors. We will offer as a primary foundation technology, a digital imaging and communications in medicine (“DICOM”) viewer on innovative hardware, a fully Certification Commission for Healthcare Information Technology (“CCHIT”) certified EMR solution, and safe and efficient storage of diagnostic images both as individual clinical assets and as parts of a larger enterprise.

Our goal is to bring a fully integrated PACS/RIS/EMR package to market within a realistic timeframe in order to meet FDA and the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“ARRA”) standards, starting with an innovative EMR framework as a basis for future product expansions. The stated project goal is to begin marketing a combined PACS/RIS/EMR solution sometime in ~~2015~~2016. With a CCHIT qualified EMR fully integrated with TouchPACS, we will be qualified for ARRA reimbursement.

The PACS will support the DICOM v3 standards for both communication and visualization as a solution, a scope of service contained within the boundaries of the total TouchEMR package. PACS is being modularized this way in order to allow for other such future standards/relational forks as laboratory control or inpatient expansion. PACS will be deemed as v1 complete upon clearance of Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) Class2 certification with all parts intact, and EMR v1 will be considered v1 complete on receiving CCHIT certification. PACS/EMR will be implemented to include all necessary hardware and configuration for a customer, such that our expected target audience is considered “computer illiterate” and will not be expected to provide implementation equipment independently. To that end, simplification of very complex workflow and diagnostic processes is a central focus within our developed interfaces. We propose that smart implementation of clinical software as a workflow client/server process will allow us to market both products (PACS and EMR) as either standalone or paired.

Technology

Over the next 18 months Touch Medical Solutions plans:

To market both individually and combined as a full Practice Management suite the following products:

TouchERP - Medical Enterprise Resource Planning (“Medical Enterprise RP”) –Is designed for a complete solution to various business sectors, including healthcare. A combination of products providing Clinical Management, Resource Management, Financial Management, and a Practice Information System, that are critical to the medical practices in today’s healthcare industry.

TouchPMS – Practice Management Suite – This is a category of software that deals with the day-to-day operations of a medical practice. Such software frequently allows users to capture patient demographics, schedule appointments, maintain lists of insurance payers, perform billing tasks, and generate reports.

TouchEMR – Electronic Medical (Health) Record – This is a locally kept copy of the patient health information located at each applicable healthcare provider, which can then be merged with the central EHR record as diagnostic information changes. This record can be kept in any applicable form, as long as it contains the basic pieces of information necessary to resynchronize with a central provider.

TouchRIS–Radiology Information System – This is a computerized database used by radiology departments to store, manipulate and distribute patient radiological data and imagery. The system generally consists of patient tracking and scheduling, result reporting and image tracking capabilities. RIS complements HIS (Hospital Information Systems) and is critical to efficient workflow to radiology practices.

TouchPACS – Picture Archiving and Communications Systems - In medical imaging, PACS have been developed to provide economical storage, rapid retrieval of images, access to images acquired with multiple modalities, and simultaneous access at multiple sites.

TouchPHR – Personal Health Record – This is an abstract definition of copies of patient electronic health record information, such as radiology studies or lab results, which are provided to a clinic by a patient in electronic form. This is relative to any type of portable copy device, such a CDR or USB, and defines import and export guidance for merging copies into a local (practice level) EMR.

TouchTranscription – Integrates voice recording and digital scripting into the patient record.

TouchPaperlessOffice – Through the use of a Paperless Office Solution, medical providers can store, index, search, retrieve, and modify all aspects of a patient’s medical records to provide a paperless office that can eliminate bottlenecks in a patient work flow.

Our potential for success will depend upon our ability to:

(i)

develop project synergy where our products are designed for projects to work both independently as well as in a multiple product suite;

(ii)

develop enhanced workflow and customization by creating a system workflow that will adopt an existing practices workflow as opposed to the practice needing to change their process and ideology based on the systems constraints. While the main portions of the software suite must be standardized, customization will be allowed to accomplish individual practice goals; and

(iii)

Training – All our customers will receive training before, during, and after implementation to fully understand how the systems are designed to be used.

PACS

InWe ~~2015,~~are westill ~~plan~~in ~~bring~~development toof ~~market~~ our Enterprise PACS system (TouchPACS) and plan to launch in the next year at a competitive price point. The focus of TouchPACS is to keep hardware and subscription costs affordable, making it an option for any size or type of clinical practice. In addition to a traditional PACS system on-site, TouchPACS will also offer offsite content storage, automated backup solutions, and remote software access via a web based portal product. These traditionally have been separate offerings and have represented a significant integration challenge for the small to mid-sized medical practice. We plan that TouchPACS will also provide the ability to link multiple offices, providing practices the ability to have a single system supporting all sites in which they practice.

Clinical Trial Management

ByWe ~~the~~are ~~end~~still ofin ~~2015,~~development wewith ~~plan to launch~~ a Clinical Trial Management Solution or Laboratory Information System (TouchCT). Both the Clinical Trial Management Solutions and the TouchEMR product share many core requirements offering an opportunity to expand functionality of the TouchEMR product to satisfy trial management needs. An electronic Clinical Trial Management system can provide service to drug development and medical research companies who are in the process of bringing clinical products to market in a newly regulated drug certification process.

Form Factor

Our products will offer multiple suite configurations to fit customer needs. We will offer both traditional wall- mounted displays as well as portable laptops and tablet computers.

Management is of the opinion that having a portable solution will be most useful for physicians who treat patients in multiple locations as well as for other situations where the flexibility of being mobile is required.

We will also provide a web based DICOM viewer that will allow image presentation on smartphones including:

(i)i Phones

~~iPhones~~(ii) Android

(ii)

Android

but these will be used for preliminary diagnostics only (wet read), as such devices must be FDA Class-3 approved by equipment manufacturers in order to be used for final reads in a clinical setting.

Our systems will offer a touch screen display allowing easy manipulation of images without the need to sit at a workstation with a mouse and keyboard except where this is clinically required. Utilizing modern touch screen interface technology will be attractive to physicians who want to be ahead of the technology curve, or where a physician or physician assistant will be more effective without being tied to a keyboarded workspace.

For fully integrated PACS consumers, a multi-monitor diagnostic station solution will be used to assure full conformance with DICOM and diagnostic imaging standards.

Standards

DICOM Standard

Our imaging solutions are based on the DICOM medical imaging standard, as the service is compatible with virtually every digital imaging modality and PACS in use today. This makes it a solution for orthopedists, obstetricians, family practice physicians, dentists, and chiropractors, in addition to the traditional radiology market. Increasingly, small non-radiological clinics make limited use of imaging as part of their everyday practice; we will provide a simplified, but industrial quality, answer to their software needs.

Platform

We will rely on Microsoft technologies as the backbone of our systems. By utilizing the Microsoft Visual C# development tools, and the Microsoft Visual Studio .NET 2008/2010 development environments, management is of the opinion that TouchPACS will be able to leverage Microsoft’s extensive coding library and features, and to provide an assured vendor as a foundation technology partner for our customers. We will use Microsoft Team Foundation Server to enforce an Agile software development and design philosophy. This philosophy emphasizes close collaboration between the programmer team and business experts, face-to-face communication, frequent delivery of new deployable business value and tight, self-organizing teams.

DICOM Viewer

We will provide a DICOM viewer offering advanced layering, image manipulation and other features that are typically used in large-scale implementations. By utilizing touch screen technology, we will provide a feature to a physician looking to demonstrate technology advancement to its patients. We will seeking FDA Class-2 certification for diagnostic imaging modality classifications, and will publish a formal DICOM conformance statement as a function of the development process. We are not seeking certification for use with Digital Mammography (“MG”) during stage one development, but will seek to display high resolution MG in a non-diagnostic format. The viewer product typically will deploy as a multi-monitor diagnostic station, and a touch-based tablet application, and will include a module for internet-based reading as part of the EMR portal project that we are attempting to develop.

Workflow Clients

We will provide support to our clients; in addition to DICOM PACS stations, for supporting medical records as a foundation of our product suite, including but not limited to:

(i) transcription,

(ii) management,

(iii) paperless workstation, and

(iv) export and reporting clients.

The clients’ products will be designed to work within the touch-based format or touch-assisted in cases like transcription, and are intended to be deployed on our branded encapsulated workstations and tablets.

Servers

TouchPACS has products to serve both Health Level 7 (“HL7”), a standard for exchanging information between medical applications and DICOM formatted messages natively, and allows for implementations to be unified to a central server or split into multiple servers, based on the scale needs of each customer. TouchPACS is also developing web based portal system to allow for patient scheduling, non-diagnostic review, referring physician review, and remote diagnostic reading capabilities. The web portal system will be implemented in a compatible way with both DICOM and HL7 needs in mind, allowing for a PACS web product to be developed concurrently with the EMR web product.

Government Regulation

According to the FDA, a "“device"” is: "“an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, contrivance, implant, in vitro reagent, or other similar or related article, including a component part, or accessory which is recognized in the official National Formulary, or the United States Pharmacopoeia, or any supplement to them, intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, in man or other animals, or intended to affect the structure or any function of the body of man or other animals, and which does not achieve any of its primary intended purposes through chemical action within or on the body of man or other animals and which is not dependent upon being metabolized for the achievement of any of its primary intended purposes."”

The FDA classifies devices as either Class I/II-exempt, Class II, or Class III.

Class III: Pre-Marketing Approval, or PMA: A Pre-Marketing Approval or PMA is the most stringent type of device marketing application required by FDA. A PMA is an application submitted to FDA to request clearance to market, or to continue marketing of a Class III medical device. A PMA is usually required for products with which FDA has little previous experience and in such cases where the safety and efficacy must be fully demonstrated on the product. The level of documentation is more extensive than for a 510(k) application and the review timeline is usually longer. Under this level of FDA approval, the manufacturing facility will be inspected as well as the clinical sites where the clinical trials are being or have been conducted. All the appropriate documents have to be compiled and available on demand by the FDA. The manufacturing facility is registered with the FDA and the product or device is registered with the FDA.

Class II: 510(k). This is one level down from the PMA and it is applied to devices with which the FDA has had previous experience. A 510(k) is a pre-marketing submission made to FDA to demonstrate that the device to be marketed is as safe and effective, that is, substantially equivalent, to a legally marketed device that is not subject to pre-market approval. Applicants must compare their 510(k) device to one or more similar devices currently on the U.S. market and make and support their substantial equivalency claims. The legally marketed device to which equivalence is drawn is known as the "“predicate"” device. Applicants must submit descriptive data and, when necessary, performance data to establish that their device is SE to a predicate device. Again, the data in a 510(k) is to show comparability, that is, substantial equivalency (SE) of a new device to a predicate device. Under this level of approval, the manufacturing facility is registered with the FDA and the product or device is registered with the FDA. Inspections under this classification are possible. All the appropriate cGMP and clinical data backing the claims made must be on file and available on demand by the FDA.

comparability, that is, substantial equivalency (SE) of a new device to a predicate device. Under this level of approval, the manufacturing facility is registered with the FDA and the product or device is registered with the FDA. Inspections under this classification are possible. All the appropriate cGMP and clinical data backing the claims made must be on file and available on demand by the FDA.

Class I/II Exemption: This is the lowest level of scrutiny. Most Class I devices and a few Class II devices are exempt from the pre-marketing notification requirements subject to the limitations on exemptions. However, these devices are not exempt from other general controls. All medical devices must be manufactured under a quality assurance program, be suitable for the intended use, be adequately packaged and properly labeled, and have establishment registration and device listing forms on file with the FDA.

In January 2012, the TouchPACS software suite received a Class II 510(k) clearance from the FDA.

Effect of Compliance with Federal, State, and Local Provisions for the Protection of the Environment

We have not incurred and do not anticipate incurring any expenses associated with environmental laws.

Main Competitors

The following are comparable PACS solutions to a TouchPACS system.

Emed Fusion/Merge Systems http://www.merge.com

Intelerad http://www.intelerad.com/en/index.php

Fuji Synapse http://www.fujimed.com/

GE Centricity http://www.gehealthcare.com/centricityenterprise/

Agfa Impax http://www.agfa.com/en/he/products_services/all_products/impax_enterprise.jsp

Patents, Trademarks, Licenses and Intellectual Property

In May 2011, we applied for trademark protection with the United States Trademark and Patent Office for the following trademarks:

a) Touch Medical Solutions Touch PACS

b) Touch Medical Solutions TouchEMR

c) Touch Medical Solutions TouchPMS

d) Touch Medical Solutions TouchRIS

The trademarks have not been approved to this date.

Employees

We currently have 2 employees: George England is the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer. Rik J. Deitsch is the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer.

Report to Security Holders

We are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Accordingly, we file annual, quarterly and other reports and information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You may read and copy these reports in Washington, D.C. Our filings are also available to the public from commercial document retrieval services and the Internet world wide website maintained by the Securities and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov.

Item 1A. Risk Factors

You should carefully consider the risks described below regarding our operations, financial condition, financing, our common stock and other matters. If any of the following or other material risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, or results or operations could be materially adversely affected.

Our ability to continue as a going concern is in doubt absent obtaining adequate new debt or equity financing and achieving sufficient sales levels.

We incurred net losses of $2369,~~728,637~~285 for the 12 months ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and $12,~~101~~728,~~578~~637 infor ~~fiscal~~the ~~2013~~12 months ended December 31, 2014. We anticipate that these losses will continue for the foreseeable future. Our continued existence is dependent upon our achieving sufficient sales levels of our products and obtaining adequate financing. Unless we can begin to generate material revenue, we may not be able to remain in business. We cannot assure you that we will raise enough money or generate sufficient sales to meet our future working capital needs.

We have no revenue producing history and expect losses to continue for the foreseeable future.

We have yet to establish any history of profitable operations. We have incurred annual losses of $2369,~~728,637~~285 and $12,~~101~~728,~~578~~637 during the fiscal years of operations ending December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively. Our potential profitability will require the successful commercialization of our medical software products.

We will require additional financing to sustain our operations and without it will be unable to continue operations.

At December 31, ~~2014~~2015, we had a working capital deficit of $1,~~481~~448,~~959~~633. We have a negative cash flow from operations of $~~460~~183,~~528~~294 and $~~270~~460,~~560~~528 for the years ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively. We have insufficient financial resources to fund our operations.

If we cannot sell a sufficient volume of our products, we will be unable to continue in business.

To date, we have no sales of our medical software products. If we cannot achieve sufficient sales or we are unable to secure financing our operations will be negatively affected.

We have no history of generating revenues on which to evaluate our potential for future success and to determine if we will be able to execute our business plan; accordingly, it is difficult to evaluate our future prospects and the risk of success or failure of our business.

You must consider our business and prospects in light of the risks and difficulties we will encounter as an early-stage revenue producing company. These risks include:

our ability to effectively and efficiently market and distribute our products;

our ability to obtain market acceptance of our current products and future products that may be developed by us; and

our ability to sell our products at competitive prices which exceed our per unit costs.

We may be unable to address these risks and difficulties, which could materially and adversely affect our revenue, operating results and our ability to continue to operate our business.

Our growth strategy reflected in our business plan may be unachievable or may not result in profitability.

We may be unable to implement our growth strategy reflected in our business plan rapidly enough for us to achieve profitability. Our growth strategy is dependent on a number of factors, including market acceptance of our products and the acceptance by the medical community of using these products in practice. We cannot assure you that our products will be purchased in amounts sufficient to attain profitability.

Among other things, our efforts to expand our sales will be adversely affected if:

we are unable to attract sufficient customers to the products we offer in light of the price and other terms required in order for us to attain the level of profitability that will enable us to continue to pursue our growth strategy;

adequate penetration of new markets at reasonable cost becomes impossible limiting the future demand for our products below the level assumed by our business plan;

we are unable to meet regulatory requirements in the intellectual marketplace that would otherwise allow us for wider distribution; and

we are unable to meet FDA regulatory requirements that would potentially expand our product base and potential revenues.

If we cannot manage our growth effectively, we may not become profitable.

Businesses, which grow rapidly often, have difficulty managing their growth. If we grow rapidly, we will need to expand our management by recruiting and employing experienced executives and key employees capable of providing the necessary support. We cannot assure you that our management will be able to manage our growth effectively or successfully.

Among other things, implementation of our growth strategy would be adversely affected if we were not able to attract sufficient customers to the products and services we offer or plan to offer in light of the price and other terms required in order for us to attain the necessary profitability.

If we are unable to protect our proprietary technology, our business could be harmed.

Our intellectual property, including our proprietary software, is our key asset. Competitors may be able to back-engineer our products and compete effectively with us. The cost to prosecute infringements of our intellectual property or the cost to defend our products against patent infringement or other intellectual property litigation by others could be substantial. We cannot assure you that:

patents licensed by us will not be challenged by competitors,

our patents, licensed and other proprietary rights from third parties will not result in costly litigation;

pending and future patent applications will result in issued patents,

the patents or our other intellectual property will be found to be valid or sufficiently broad to protect these technologies or provide us with a competitive advantage,

if we are sued for patent infringement, whether we will have sufficient funds to defend our patents, and

we will be successful in defending against future patent infringement claims asserted against our products.

Should any risks pertaining to the foregoing occur, our brand name reputation, results of operation and revenues will be negatively affected.

We are subject to substantial FDA regulations which may increase our costs or otherwise adversely affect our operations.

Our software products are subject to FDA regulations. If we fail to comply with current or future regulations, the FDA could force us to stop selling our products or require us to incur substantial costs from adopting measures to maintain FDA compliance.

Loss of any of our key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial results.

We are dependent upon a limited number of our employees: (a) our Chief Executive Officer who directs our operations; and (b) our Chief Financial Officer who oversees public activities and filings. Our success depends on the continued services of our senior management as well as our ability to attract additional members to our management and research and development teams. The unexpected loss of the services of any of our management or other key personnel could have a material adverse effect upon our operations and financial results.

We may be unable to maintain and expand our business if we are not able to retain, hire and integrate key management and operating personnel.

Our success depends in large part on the continued services and efforts of key management personnel. Competition for such employees is intense and the process of locating key personnel with the combination of skills and attributes required to execute our business strategies may be lengthy. The loss of key personnel could have a material adverse impact on our ability to execute our business objectives. We do not have any key man life insurance on the lives of any of our executive officers.

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

Because the market for our common stock is limited, persons who purchase our common stock may not be able to resell their shares at or above the purchase price paid by them.

Our common stock trades on the OTC-Markets, which is not a liquid market. There is currently only a limited public market for our common stock. We cannot assure you that an active public market for our common stock will develop or be sustained in the future. If an active market for our common stock does not develop or is not sustained, the price may decline.

Because we are subject to the “penny stock” rules, brokers cannot generally solicit the purchase of our common stock, which adversely affects its liquidity and market price.

The SEC has adopted regulations, which generally define “penny stock” to be an equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to specific exemptions. The market price of our common stock on the OTCBB has been substantially less than $5.00 per share and therefore we are currently considered a “penny stock” according to SEC rules. This designation requires any broker-dealer selling these securities to disclose certain information concerning the transaction, obtain a written agreement from the purchaser and determine that the purchaser is reasonably suitable to purchase the securities. These rules limit the ability of broker-dealers to solicit purchases of our common stock and therefore reduce the liquidity of the public market for our shares.

108

Because much of our outstanding shares are freely tradable, sales of these shares could cause the market price of our common stock to drop significantly, even if our business is performing well.

As of December 31, ~~2014~~2015, we had ~~351~~415,~~999~~961,~~486~~936 outstanding shares that were subject to the limitations of Rule 144 under the Securities Act of 1933. In general, Rule 144 provides that any our non-affiliates, who have held restricted common stock for at least six-months, are entitled to sell their restricted stock freely, provided that we stay current in our SEC filings. After one year, a non-affiliate may sell without any restrictions.

An affiliate may sell after one year with the following restrictions: (i) we are current in ours filings, (ii) certain manner of sale provisions, (iii) filing of Form 144, and (iv) volume limitations limiting the sale of shares within any three-month period to a number of shares that does not exceed 1% of the total number of outstanding shares. A person who has ceased to be an affiliate at least three months immediately preceding the sale and who has owned such shares of common stock for at least one year is entitled to sell the shares under Rule 144 without regard to any of the limitations described above.

An investment in our common stock may be diluted in the future as a result of the issuance of additional securities or the exercise of options or warrants.

In order to raise additional capital to fund our strategic plan, we may issue additional shares of common stock or securities convertible, exchangeable or exercisable into common stock from time to time, which could result in substantial dilution to any person who purchases our common stock. Because we have a negative net tangible book value, purchasers will suffer substantial dilution. We cannot assure you that we will be successful in raising funds from the sale of common stock or other equity securities.

Since we intend to retain any earnings for development of our business for the foreseeable future, you will likely not receive any dividends for the foreseeable future.

We have not and do not intend to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future, as we intend to retain any earnings for development and expansion of our business operations. As a result, you will not receive any dividends on your investment for an indefinite period of time.

Due to factors beyond our control, our stock price may continue to be volatile.

The market price of our common stock has been and is expected to be highly volatile. Any of the following factors could affect the market price of our common stock:

our failure to generate revenue,

our failure to achieve and maintain profitability,

short selling activities,

the sale of a large amount of common stock by our shareholders including those who invested prior to commencement of trading,

actual or anticipated variations in our quarterly results of operations,

announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts, new products, acquisitions, commercial relationships, joint ventures or capital commitments,

the loss of major customers or product or component suppliers,

the loss of significant business relationships,

our failure to meet financial analysts’ performance expectations,

changes in earnings estimates and recommendations by financial analysts, or

changes in market valuations of similar companies.

In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted. A securities class action suit against us could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s time and attention, which would otherwise be used to benefit our business.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None

119

Item 2. Properties

As of ~~February~~May 15, ~~2013~~2016, we shared office approximately 250 square feet at ~~12502~~12538 West Atlantic Blvd, Coral Springs, Florida at no charge. The office is comprised of a reception area, conference room, 3 offices, 2 restrooms and 2 cubicle workstations. We have use of a conference room, reception area, printer, fax and scanning machine. Our offices are adequate for our needs. Formerly, we occupied 400 square feet of space at 3455 University Parkway, Wake Forest University in Wake Forest, North Carolina.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are not a party to any pending legal proceedings where any officer, director, affiliate of owner of 5% or more of our common stock is adverse to us or where the amount of damages claimed, exclusive of interest and costs, exceeds ten percent of our current assets. Pursuant to the terms of the Merger, responsibility for any liability emerging from our pre-merger business relies wholly with our pre-merger management.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

None

PART II

Market Information

Our common stock is quoted on the OTC-Markets under the trading symbol "“DMHI"”. The stock began active trading on the OTCBB on January 10, 2013 and has traded at prices between $0.~~001~~0005 and $0.25. At December 31, ~~2014~~2015, the closing bid price of our common stock was $0.~~0023~~0006.

Penny Stock Considerations

Our shares of common stock are "“penny stocks"” as that term is generally defined in the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 as equity securities with a price of less than $5.00. Our shares are subject to rules that impose sales practice and disclosure requirements on broker-dealers who engage in certain transactions involving a penny stock.

Under the penny stock regulations, a broker-dealer selling a penny stock to anyone other than an established customer or "“accredited investor"” must make a special suitability determination regarding the purchaser and must receive the purchaser'’s written consent to the transaction prior to the sale, unless the broker-dealer is otherwise exempt. Generally, an individual with a net worth in excess of $1,000,000 or annual income exceeding $200,000 individually or $300,000 together with his or her spouse is considered an accredited investor.

In addition, under the penny stock regulations the broker-dealer is required to:

Deliver, prior to any transaction involving a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prepared by the Securities and Exchange Commission relating to the penny stock market, unless the broker-dealer or the transaction is otherwise exempt;

Disclose commission payable to the broker-dealer and its registered representatives and current bid and offer quotations for the securities;

Send monthly statements disclosing recent price information pertaining to the penny stock held in a customer'’s account, the account'’s value and information regarding the limited market in penny stocks; and

Make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser'’s written agreement to the transaction, prior to conducting any penny stock transaction in the customer'’s account.

Because of these regulations, broker-dealers may encounter difficulties in their attempt to sell shares of our common stock, which may affect the ability of shareholders to sell their shares in the secondary market and have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity in the secondary market. These additional sales practice and disclosure requirements could impede the sale of our securities. In addition, the liquidity for our securities may be adversely affected, with a corresponding decrease in the price of our securities. Our shares are subject to such penny stock rules and our shareholders will, in all likelihood, find it difficult to sell their securities.

1210

Holders

As of ~~April~~May 135, ~~2015~~2016, based upon records obtained from our transfer agent, there were 16 holders of record of our common stock and 33 holders of our preferred stock. Our transfer agent records does not account for other holders of our common stock that are held in street name or by broker dealers as custodian for individual holders and beneficiaries of our stock. We have one class of common stock outstanding., and one class of preferred stock outstanding

Dividends

We have not declared any cash dividends on our common stock since our inception and do not anticipate paying such dividends in the foreseeable future. We plan to retain any future earnings for use in our business. Any decisions as to future payment of dividends will depend on our earnings and financial position and such other factors as our Board of Directors deems relevant. There are no restrictions contained in our bylaws or otherwise pertaining to our issuing dividends.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

~~During~~On ~~January~~March 8, ~~2014~~2016, the ~~Company~~debt ~~issued~~holder 5made the conversions of a total of 20,000,000 shares of the ~~Company~~company’s ~~common~~restricted stock tosatisfying ~~a subscriber at a price per share of~~ $~~0.01~~20,000 ~~for total proceeds~~ of ~~$50,000.~~the note.

During ~~February~~May, ~~2014~~2015, the Company ~~issued~~signed ~~5,000,000~~an ~~shares~~agreement ofto pay the ~~Company’s~~consultant ~~restricted~~for ~~common~~a ~~stock~~monthly tofee aof ~~consultant~~$2,500 ~~for~~in ~~consulting~~cash ~~services~~and $5,000 in stock for a term of one year. The number of shares will be based on an average of the three lowest VWAP’s for the last two weeks of that month started from May 2015. During year ended December 31, 2015, the total of 10,555,556 shares were ~~valued~~granted atwith a fair value of $010,556.02 ~~per~~The ~~share~~shares were valued using April 21, ~~the~~2015 closing ~~price~~value of shares on date of agreement. The number shares are calculated using an average of the ~~stock~~three onlowest VWAP’s for the ~~date~~last two weeks of ~~grant~~May and June 2015. On August 25, 2015, the agreement was terminated and the common stocks that have been granted were cancelled due to nonperformance.

During ~~February~~the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015, the ~~Company~~debt ~~issued~~holder 5made the following two conversions of a total of 19,~~000~~962,~~000~~450 shares of the ~~Company~~company’s restricted ~~common~~ stock tosatisfying athe ~~consultant~~remaining ~~for~~$17,562 ~~consulting~~of ~~services~~the ~~for~~note in full with a ~~term~~fair value of ~~one~~$46,450, ~~year.~~included ~~The~~in ~~shares~~the ~~were~~fair ~~valued~~value atof debt balance of $~~0.015~~46,450 ~~per~~was ~~share~~settlement of derivative liability of $26,488.The ~~the~~Company ~~closing~~recorded ~~price~~a gain of ~~the~~$10,468 ~~stock~~for onless shares issued during the ~~date~~conversion ofthan ~~grant.~~what was called for in the original agreement.


Date	Number of shares converted	Fair Value of Debt Converted
02/5/2015	14,400,000	$33,578
03/27/2015	5,562,450	$12,872

~~During~~On ~~March~~January 28, 2015, following the convertible note agreement in the amount of $250,000 on July 25, 2014, the ~~Company~~note ~~granted~~was 7satisfied in full with 25,000,000 shares of ~~the~~common ~~Company’s~~stocks ~~common~~per ~~stock~~settlement toagreement with a ~~subscriber~~fair atvalue aof ~~price~~$269,471, ~~per~~included ~~share~~in the fair value of debt balance of $~~0.005~~269,471 ~~for~~was ~~total~~accrued ~~proceeds~~interest of $3511,~~000.~~194 ~~These~~and ~~shares~~settlement ~~were~~of ~~accrued~~derivative inliability ~~common~~of ~~stock~~$8,277. ~~issuable~~The atCompany ~~March~~recorded 31a loss of $11,105 ~~2014~~for asmore shares issued during the ~~shares~~conversion ~~were~~than ~~not~~what ~~issued~~was ~~until~~called ~~April~~for ~~2014.~~in the original agreement.

~~During~~On April 1, ~~2014~~2015, the ~~Company~~debt ~~issued~~holder 7made a conversion of a total of 19,000,000 shares of the ~~Company~~company’s ~~common~~restricted stock tosatisfying a$19,000 ~~subscriber~~of atthe note with a ~~price~~fair ~~per~~value ~~share~~of $25,769, included in the fair value of debt balance of $025,769 was settlement of derivative liability of $25,769.~~005~~The ~~for~~Company ~~total~~recorded ~~proceeds~~a gain of $3531,~~000~~091 for less shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement.

During September through December, 2014, following the convertible note agreement in the amount of $40,000 on March 3, 2014, the debt holder made the following conversions of a total of 22,106,486 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying $40,000 of the note with a fair value of $89,441 included in the fair value of $89,441 was settlement of derivative liability of $49,441. The Company recorded a loss of $2,324 for additional shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement.

Date	Number of shares converted	Fair Value of Debt Converted
9/15/2014	6,708,698	$30,634
9/22/2014	6,719,753	$29,523
10/7/2014	2,904,864	$15,155
12/4/2014	5,773,171	$14,129

Date	Number of shares converted	Fair Value of Debt Converted
10/20/2014	1,724,137	$13,334
10/30/2014	1,785,714	$13,596
11/10/2014	1,851,851	$12,573
12/15/2014	14,531,298	$41,948

During February through March, 2014, following the convertible note agreement in the amount of $50,000 on March 31, 2014, the debt holder made the conversions of a total of 19,962,450 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying the remaining amount of the $19,961 of the note in full.

During April, 2014, following the convertible note agreement in the amount of $50,000 on May 5, 2014, the debt holder made the conversions of a total of 19,000,000 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying $19,000 of the note.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data

As a Smaller Reporting Company, we are not required to provide information required by Item 6.

Item 7. Management'’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

In preparing the consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP), we have adopted various accounting policies. Our most significant accounting policies are disclosed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Our estimates and assumptions, including those related to the ability to continue as going concern, legal proceedings, the recoverability of inventory, long-lived assets, the fair value of stock-based compensation and the fair value of warrant liabilities are updated as appropriate, which in most cases is at least quarterly. We base our estimates on historical experience, or various assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances and the results form the basis for making judgments about the reported values of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. Actual results may materially differ from these estimates.

Estimates are considered to be critical if they meet both of the following criteria: (1) the estimate requires assumptions about material matters that are uncertain at the time the accounting estimates are made, and (2) other materially different estimates could have been reasonably made or material changes in the estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period to period. Our critical accounting estimates include the following:11

~~Revenue~~long-lived ~~Recognition:~~assets, Inthe ~~general,~~fair wevalue ~~record~~of ~~revenue~~stock-based ~~when~~compensation ~~persuasive~~and ~~evidence~~the fair value of anwarrant ~~arrangement~~liabilities ~~exists~~are updated as appropriate, ~~services~~which ~~have~~in ~~been~~most ~~rendered~~cases oris ~~product~~at ~~delivery~~least ~~has~~quarterly. ~~occurred~~We base our estimates on historical experience, ~~the~~or ~~sales~~various ~~price~~assumptions tothat ~~the~~are ~~customer~~believed isto ~~fixed~~be orreasonable ~~determinable,~~under the circumstances and ~~collectability~~the isresults ~~reasonably~~form ~~assured.~~the ~~Provision~~basis for ~~sales~~making ~~returns~~judgments ~~will~~about bethe ~~estimated~~reported ~~based~~values onof ~~the~~assets, ~~Company's~~liabilities, ~~historical~~revenues ~~return~~and ~~experience~~expenses. Actual results may materially differ from these estimates.

~~Accounts~~Estimates ~~Receivable~~are ~~and~~considered ~~Allowance~~to ~~for~~be ~~Doubtful~~critical ~~Accounts:~~if ~~Our~~they ~~accounts~~meet ~~receivable~~both ~~are~~of ~~stated~~the atfollowing ~~estimated~~criteria: ~~net~~(1) ~~realizable~~the ~~value.~~estimate ~~Accounts~~requires ~~receivable~~assumptions about material matters that are ~~comprised~~uncertain ofat ~~balances~~the ~~due~~time ~~from~~the ~~customers~~accounting ~~net~~estimates ofare ~~estimated~~made, ~~allowances~~and ~~for~~(2) ~~uncollectible~~other ~~accounts.~~materially Indifferent ~~determining~~estimates ~~collectability,~~could ~~historical~~have ~~trends~~been ~~are~~reasonably ~~evaluated~~made ~~and~~or ~~specific~~material ~~customer~~changes ~~issues~~in the estimates are ~~reviewed~~reasonably likely to ~~arrive~~occur atfrom ~~appropriate~~period ~~allowances~~to period. Our critical accounting estimates include the following:

~~Inventory~~Revenue ~~Obsolescence~~Recognition: ~~Inventories~~In ~~are~~general, ~~valued~~we atrecord ~~the~~revenue ~~lower~~when persuasive evidence of ~~average~~an ~~cost~~arrangement exists, services have been rendered or ~~market~~product ~~value.~~delivery Wehas ~~periodically~~occurred, ~~perform~~the ansales ~~evaluation~~price ofto ~~inventory~~the ~~for~~customer ~~excess,~~is ~~impairments~~fixed or determinable, and ~~obsolete~~collectability ~~items~~is reasonably assured. Provision for sales returns will be estimated based on the Company’s historical return experience.

14Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts: Our accounts receivable are stated at estimated net realizable value. Accounts receivable are comprised of balances due from customers net of estimated allowances for uncollectible accounts. In determining collectability, historical trends are evaluated and specific customer issues are reviewed to arrive at appropriate allowances.

~~Long-Lived~~Inventory ~~Assets~~Obsolescence: ~~The~~Inventories ~~carrying~~are ~~value~~valued ofat ~~long-lived assets is reviewed annually and on a regular basis for~~ the ~~existence~~lower of ~~facts~~average ~~and~~cost ~~circumstances~~or ~~that~~market ~~may suggest impairment~~value. IfWe ~~indicators~~periodically ofperform ~~impairment~~an ~~are~~evaluation ~~present, we determine whether the sum~~ of ~~the~~inventory ~~estimated~~for ~~undiscounted future cash flows attributable to the long-lived asset in question is less than its carrying amount. If less~~excess, weimpairments ~~measure the amount of the impairment based on the amount that the carrying value of the impaired asset exceeds the discounted cash flows expected to result from the use~~ and ~~eventual~~obsolete ~~disposal of the impaired assets~~items.

~~Derivative~~Long-Lived ~~Financial Instrument~~Assets: WeThe docarrying ~~not~~value ~~use~~of ~~derivative~~long-lived ~~instruments~~assets tois ~~hedge~~reviewed ~~exposures~~annually toand ~~cash~~on ~~flow,~~a ~~market,~~regular orbasis ~~foreign~~for ~~currency~~the ~~risks.~~existence ~~Management evaluates all~~ of ~~its~~facts ~~financial~~and ~~instruments~~circumstances ~~to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features~~ that ~~qualify~~may assuggest ~~embedded derivatives~~impairment. ~~For~~If ~~derivative~~indicators ~~financial~~of ~~instruments~~impairment ~~that~~ are ~~accounted~~present, ~~for~~we asdetermine ~~liabilities,~~whether the ~~derivative~~sum ~~instrument~~of isthe ~~initially~~estimated ~~recorded~~undiscounted atfuture ~~its~~cash ~~fair~~flows ~~value~~attributable ~~and~~to isthe ~~then re~~long-~~valued~~lived atasset ~~each reporting date, with changes~~ in ~~the~~question ~~fair~~is ~~value~~less ~~reported~~than asits ~~charges~~carrying ~~or credits to income~~amount. ~~For~~If ~~option-based simple derivative financial instruments~~less, we ~~use~~measure the ~~Black-Scholes~~amount ~~option-pricing~~of ~~model to value~~ the ~~derivative~~impairment ~~instruments~~based aton ~~inception~~the ~~and~~amount ~~subsequent~~that ~~valuation~~the ~~dates.~~carrying ~~For complex embedded derivatives, we use a Dilution-Adjusted Black-Scholes method to~~ value ~~the derivative instruments at inception and subsequent valuation dates. The classification~~ of ~~derivative instruments, including whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at~~ the ~~end~~impaired ofasset ~~each~~exceeds ~~reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in~~ the ~~balance~~discounted ~~sheet~~cash asflows ~~current~~expected orto ~~non-current~~result ~~based~~from ~~on whether or not net-cash settlement of~~ the ~~derivative~~use ~~instrument~~and ~~could~~eventual bedisposal ~~required within 12 months~~ of the ~~balance~~impaired ~~sheet date~~assets.

~~Share-Based~~Derivative ~~Compensation~~Financial Instrument: We ~~record~~do ~~share-based~~not ~~compensation~~use inderivative ~~accordance~~instruments ~~with~~to ~~FASB~~hedge ~~ASC~~exposures ~~718~~to cash flow, ~~Stock~~market, ~~Compensation~~or foreign currency risks. ~~FASB~~Management ~~ASC~~evaluates ~~718~~all ~~requires~~of ~~that~~its ~~the~~financial ~~cost~~instruments ~~resulting~~to ~~from~~determine ~~all~~if ~~share-based~~such ~~transactions~~instruments are ~~recorded~~derivatives inor ~~the~~contain features that qualify as embedded derivatives. For derivative financial ~~statements~~instruments ~~over~~that are accounted for as liabilities, the ~~respective~~derivative ~~service~~instrument ~~periods.~~is Itinitially ~~establishes~~recorded at its fair value asand ~~the~~is ~~measurement~~then ~~objective~~re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in ~~accounting~~the ~~for~~fair ~~share~~value reported as charges or credits to income. For option-based ~~payment~~simple ~~arrangements~~derivative ~~and~~financial ~~requires~~instruments, ~~all~~we ~~entities~~use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to ~~apply~~value the derivative instruments at inception and subsequent valuation dates. For complex embedded derivatives, we use a ~~fair~~Dilution-~~value~~Adjusted Black-~~based~~Scholes ~~measurement~~method into ~~accounting~~value ~~for~~the ~~share-based~~derivative ~~payment~~instruments ~~transactions~~at ~~with~~inception ~~employees~~and subsequent valuation dates. ~~FASB~~The ~~ASC~~classification ~~718~~of ~~also~~derivative ~~establishes~~instruments, ~~fair~~including ~~value~~whether such instruments should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the ~~measurement~~end ~~objective~~of ~~for~~each ~~transactions~~reporting inperiod. ~~which~~Derivative aninstrument ~~entity~~liabilities ~~acquires~~are ~~goods~~classified orin ~~services~~the ~~from~~balance sheet as current or non-~~employees~~current inbased ~~share~~on whether or not net-~~based~~cash ~~payment~~settlement ~~transactions~~of the derivative instrument could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.

~~Accomplishments~~Share-Based ~~During~~Compensation: ~~2014~~We record share-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC 718, Stock Compensation. FASB ASC 718 requires that the cost resulting from all share-based transactions are recorded in the financial statements over the respective service periods. It establishes fair value as the measurement objective in accounting for share-based payment arrangements and ~~Subsequent~~requires all entities to ~~2014~~apply a fair-value-based measurement in accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees. FASB ASC 718 also establishes fair value as the measurement objective for transactions in which an entity acquires goods or services from non-employees in share-based payment transactions.

OnAccomplishments ~~March~~During ~~26,~~2015 ~~2014~~and weSubsequent announced that we were expanding our Advisory Board in anticipation of the completion of the announced merger with the Virtual Physician's Network (VPN). In anticipation of the closing, DMH is expanding our Advisory Board to ~~include medical professionals that will aid in the testing, utilization and promotion of the Company's software products.~~2015

On ~~July~~January 247, ~~2014~~2015 we announced ~~that~~ the ~~much-anticipated~~release ~~merger~~ of ~~DMHI~~version ~~and~~1.2 of the Virtual ~~Physicians~~Physician’s Network ~~was~~mobile ~~completed~~healthcare platform that includes new features for both surgeon and vendor members. AsThese ~~anticipated,~~changes ~~the~~include: ~~CEO~~New ofcase ~~Virtual~~schedule ~~Physicians~~views ~~Network,~~and ~~George~~searches ~~England,~~for ~~assumed~~surgeons; ~~the~~Edit ~~same~~case ~~role~~status improvements; New content link ability for ~~DMHI.~~vendors ~~The~~and ~~former~~surgeons; ~~CEO~~Book ofcase ~~DMH~~improvements ~~International,~~for ~~Rik~~surgeons; JNew ~~Deitsch~~vendor layout for iPhone, ~~will~~iPad, ~~stay~~Web onand ~~with~~Android ~~DMHI~~devices; New case schedule views and ~~serve~~searches asfor ~~Chairman~~vendors; ofEducation ~~the~~added ~~Board.~~to vendor experience; Product Information added to vendor experience; Added ability to link vendors to booked cases; and Bug fixes and performance improvements

On July 31, 2014 we announced that Miracle Mile Medical Center (MMMC) in Los Angeles, CA has agreed to participate in the beta launch of Virtual Physician's Network (VPN). Miracle Mile Medical Center is located in the heart of the beautiful Miracle Mile District in Los Angeles, CA. Their facility is dedicated to providing quality, clinical care in a compassionate and warm atmosphere. MMMC was founded in 2004 by Gil Tepper, M.D., F.A.C.S. and offers inpatient, outpatient and specialized services to the community. Dr. Tepper is a nationally recognized orthopedic spine surgeon and the current Chief of Staff at MMMC.12

On ~~August~~March 517, ~~2014~~2015 we announced that ~~Florida~~our ~~Back~~Chief ~~Institute~~Executive inOfficer ~~Boca~~(CEO) ~~Raton~~George England was interviewed live on iHeart Radio’s Health Tech Talk Live hosted by Ben Chodor and broadcasted nationwide on iHeart Radio / Clear Channel Atlanta Studios - 640 WGST AM. The interview was aired on Saturday, FLMarch ~~had~~7, ~~agreed~~2015 at 3:00pm ET. In this interview, Mr. England discussed why it’s critically important to ~~participate~~keep ineveryone accountable among all the ~~beta~~stakeholders ~~launch~~that ofdeliver ~~Virtual~~care ~~Physician's~~to ~~Network~~patients ~~(VPN)~~especially around the surgical space. ~~The~~He ~~Florida~~also ~~Back~~discussed ~~Institute~~how the company is ~~located~~dedicated into ~~Boca~~help ~~Raton~~surgeons, ~~Florida~~medical institutions and ~~was~~medical ~~founded~~vendors inimprove ~~1989~~clinical and financial outcomes by ~~Orthopedic~~utilizing ~~Spine~~their ~~Surgeon~~intuitive ~~Jeffrey~~mobile ~~Fernyhough,~~healthcare ~~M.D.~~platform ~~and~~that ~~Neurosurgeon~~focuses ~~Jordan~~on ~~Davis,~~these ~~M.D.~~core ~~For~~values: 25increasing ~~years~~accountability, ~~the~~improving ~~Florida~~clinical ~~Back~~outcomes, ~~Institute~~driving ~~has~~revenue, ~~offered~~and asaving ~~complete~~time ~~multi-specialty~~and ~~treatment~~money. ~~approach~~The tointerview ~~spinal~~can ~~disorders~~be heard at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z03oki6dERk&feature=youtu.be.

On ~~August~~July 2128th, ~~2014~~2015 we announced ~~that~~the ~~Michigan~~release ~~Head~~of ~~and~~version ~~Spine~~2.1 ~~Institute~~of ~~(MHSI) had agreed to participate in~~ the ~~beta launch of~~ Virtual Physician'’s Network ~~(VPN).~~mobile ~~The~~healthcare ~~Michigan~~platform ~~Head~~that ~~and~~includes ~~Spine~~new ~~Institute~~features isfor ~~one~~both ofsurgeon ~~Michigan's largest groups of neurosurgeons, physiatrists,~~ and ~~neuropsychologists~~vendor members. ~~With~~The 9new ~~locations~~release inadds ~~the~~a ~~greater~~Hospital ~~southeastern~~Experience ~~Michigan~~and ~~area,~~a ~~MHSI~~Vendor ~~provides~~Admin ~~complete~~experience ~~care~~to ~~for~~the ~~injuries~~Virtual ~~and~~Physicians ~~diseases~~Network ~~related~~platform toavailable ~~the~~on ~~head,~~all ~~brain~~iOS, ~~skull~~Android and ~~spine~~web-based devices.

OnThis ~~September~~latest ~~10,~~2.1 ~~2014~~version werelease ~~announced~~now ~~that~~gives hospital staff full access to the ~~Joan~~Virtual C.Physicians ~~Edwards~~Network ~~School~~platform ofto ~~Medicine~~interact atwith ~~Marshall~~the ~~University~~surgeons inand ~~Huntington,~~vendor ~~West~~reps ~~Virginia~~working ~~had~~in ~~agreed~~their tofacility. ~~participate~~Also in this new 2.1 version release, the ~~beta~~administrative ~~launch~~and management staff of ~~Virtual~~medical ~~Physician's~~device ~~Network~~vendors ~~(VPN)~~can now also have full visibility to the cases their surgeon customers are scheduling with their respective sales representatives.

OnResults ~~October 8, 2014 we announced that we will be exhibiting at the North American Spine Society (NASS) 2014 annual meeting next month in San Francisco, CA. Our attendance is part~~ of the national launch of the Virtual Physician's Network mobile technology. The NASS annual meeting is one of the largest academic spine meetings in the world where spine care professionals from around the globe will share the latest information, innovative techniques and procedures, best practices, and new technologies.Operations

15Working Capital

On October 23, 2014 we announced that we had agreed to a partnership with Rapid Improvement, Inc., a Natural Language Processing (NLP) technology company in Washington, D.C. This new added feature to the Virtual Physicians Network mobile platform will enhance the value of VPN to their users as well as add an additional revenue stream for DMHI in the form of analytics reporting.


	December 31, 2015 $	December 31, 2014 $
Current Assets	40	984
Current Liabilities	1,448,673	1,482,943
Working Capital (Deficit)	(1,448,633)	(1,481,959)

OnCash December 2, 2014 we provided updates from the recent NASS annual meeting. NASS confirmed that attendance surpassed last year's meeting in New Orleans. At this year's meeting there were 2,866 medical attendees, 384 non-medical attendees, 323 exhibitor companies and over 3,000 exhibitor reps.Flows

On December 4, 2014 we announced that we expanded our Medical Advisory Board (MAB) by adding Dr. Jonathan Hyde, M.D. who is a Board Certified Orthopaedic Surgeon specializing in spinal surgery at the South Florida Spine Institute www.southfloridaspine.com in Miami Beach, FL.


	Year ended December 31, 2015 $	Year ended December 31, 2014 $
Cash Flows used in Operating Activities	(183,294)	(460,528)
Cash Flows used in Investing Activities	-	(8,053)
Cash Flows provided by Financing Activities	182,350	469,565
Net Increase (decrease) in Cash During Period	(944)	984

OnOperating December 09, 2014 we announced continued interest from the medical community that sees the value behind the company's Virtual Physician's Network platform, based on follow-up from the recent North American Spine Society (NASS) conference in San Francisco.Revenues

OnOperating ~~January~~revenues 7,since ~~2015 we announced~~ the ~~release of version 1.2 of the Virtual Physician'~~Company’s ~~Network~~inception ~~mobile~~has ~~healthcare~~been ~~platform that includes new features for both surgeon and vendor members~~$nil. These changes include: New case schedule views and searches for surgeons; Edit case status improvements; New content link ability for vendors and surgeons; Book case improvements for surgeons; New vendor layout for iPhone, iPad, Web and Android devices; New case schedule views and searches for vendors; Education added to vendor experience; Product Information added to vendor experience; Added ability to link vendors to booked cases; and Bug fixes and performance improvements

OnOperating ~~March~~Expenses ~~17, 2015 we announced that our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) George England was interviewed live on iHeart Radio's Health Tech Talk Live hosted by Ben Chodor~~ and ~~broadcasted~~Net nationwide on iHeart Radio / Clear Channel Atlanta Studios - 640 WGST AM. The interview was aired on Saturday, March 7, 2015 at 3:00pm ET. In this interview, Mr. England discussed why it's critically important to keep everyone accountable among all the stakeholders that deliver care to patients especially around the surgical space. He also discussed how the company is dedicated to help surgeons, medical institutions and medical vendors improve clinical and financial outcomes by utilizing their intuitive mobile healthcare platform that focuses on these core values: increasing accountability, improving clinical outcomes, driving revenue, and saving time and money. The interview can be heard at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z03oki6dERk&feature=youtu.beLoss

~~Results~~ During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company incurred operating expenses of ~~Operations~~$230,926 compared with $ 2,483,864 during the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease in operating expenses was attributed to a decrease in professional fees of $567,160, a decrease in research and development of $69,457, a decrease of $5,968 in general and administrative expenses and a decrease in an impairment loss of goodwill of $1,610,353.

~~Working~~Other ~~Capital~~expenses

	December 31, 2014 $	December 31, 2013 $
Current Assets	984	-
Current Liabilities	1,482,943	978,279
Working Capital (Deficit)	(1,481,959)	(978,279)

Total other expenses for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $138,359, and as compared to total other expenses for the year ended December 31, 2014 of $244,773. The decrease of $106,414 and approximately 43% in total other expenses was as a result of a decrease in amortization of debt discount from $181,397 to $59,145, a decrease of interest expense from $9,805 to $9,121, and the increase in gain on settlement of convertible debt from $10,226 to $30,454 from the year ended December 31, 2014 to the year ended December 31, 2015. The above mentioned decrease in operating expense is offset by an increase in imputed interest from $59,291 to $72,375 relating to imputed interest at 8% per annum on related party loans and a loss on change in fair value of derivatives from $4,506 to $28,172 relating to the fluctuation of the liability related to convertible debt carried at fair value.

~~Cash Flows~~13

	Year ended December 31, 2014 $	Year ended December 31, 2013 $
Cash Flows used in Operating Activities	(460,528)	(270,560)
Cash Flows used in Investing Activities	(8,053)	-
Cash Flows provided by Financing Activities	469,565	270,496
Net Increase (decrease) in Cash During Period	984	(64)

Net Loss

16For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded a net loss of $369,285 compared with $2,728,637 for the year ended December 31, 2014.

~~Operating~~Liquidity ~~Revenues~~and Capital Resources

~~Operating~~As ~~revenues~~at ~~since~~December 31, 2015, the Company’s ~~inception~~cash ~~has~~and ~~been~~total asset balance was $~~nil.~~40, compared to $984 as at December 31, 2014.

~~Operating~~As ~~Expenses~~at December 31, 2015, the Company had total liabilities of $1,448,673 compared with total liabilities of $1,482,943 at December 31, 2014. The decrease in liabilities is attributed to the decrease of $16,841 in accounts payable, the increase of $60,000 due to the Director of the Company for unpaid management fees, the decrease of $227,417 primarily due to repayment of convertible loans obtained during 2014, the increase of $17,638 due to the derivative liabilities related to the convertible debt carried at fair value, and ~~Net~~the ~~Loss~~increases of $132,350 in related party loans.

~~During~~As ~~the~~at ~~year ended~~ December 31, ~~2014~~2015, the Company ~~incurred~~had ~~operating~~a ~~expenses~~working capital deficit of $21,~~483~~448,~~864~~633 compared with a working capital deficit of $1,~~044~~481,~~344~~959 ~~during~~as ~~the~~at ~~year ended~~ December 31, ~~2013~~2014. The ~~increase in operating expenses was attributed to an~~ decrease in ~~professional~~the ~~fees~~working ofcapital ~~$256,206,~~deficit anis ~~increase~~attributed into ~~research~~settlement ~~and development~~ of ~~$87,698,~~debt athrough ~~general~~conversion ~~decrease~~ of ~~$2,323 in~~stocks ~~general~~during ~~and administrative expenses and an increase in an impairment loss of goodwill of $1,610,353~~2015.

~~Other~~Going ~~expenses~~Concern

~~Total~~Our ~~other~~ability ~~expenses~~to ~~for~~continue ~~the~~as ~~year~~a ~~ended~~going ~~December~~concern ~~31,~~is ~~2014~~contingent ~~was~~upon ~~$244,773,~~our ~~and~~ability ~~as compared~~ to ~~total~~secure ~~other~~additional ~~expenses~~financing, ~~for~~increase ~~the~~ownership ~~year~~equity ~~ended~~and ~~December~~attain ~~31,~~profitable ~~2013 of $57,234~~operations. ~~The~~In ~~increase of $187~~addition,~~539~~ ~~and~~our ~~approximately~~ability ~~328%~~to incontinue ~~total other expenses was~~ as a ~~result~~going ofconcern anmust ~~increase~~be inconsidered ~~amortization of debt discount from $0 to $181,397, a loss on change~~ in ~~fair~~light ~~value~~ of ~~derivatives from $0 to $4,506 relating to~~ the ~~fluctuation of the liability related to convertible debt carried at fair~~problems, anexpenses ~~increase~~and ofcomplications ~~interest~~frequently ~~expense~~encountered ~~from~~in $0established tomarkets ~~$9,805,~~ and ~~an increase in imputed interest from $57,234 to $59,291 relating to imputed interest at 8% per annum on related party loans. The above mentioned increase is offset by~~ the ~~gain~~competitive onenvironment ~~settlement~~in ofwhich ~~convertible~~we ~~debt for $10,226 during the year ended December 31, 2014~~operate.

~~Net~~Uncertainties ~~Loss~~and Trends

~~For~~Our ~~the~~operations ~~year~~and ~~ended~~possible ~~December~~revenues ~~31,~~are ~~2014,~~dependent ~~2014,~~now ~~the~~and ~~Company~~in ~~recorded~~the afuture ~~net~~upon ~~loss of $2,728,637 compared with $1,101,578 for~~ the ~~year~~following ~~ended December 31, 2013.~~factors:

~~Liquidity and Capital Resources~~·

AsWhether atwe ~~December~~successfully ~~31,~~develop ~~2014, the Company’s cash~~ and ~~total~~commercialize ~~asset~~products ~~balance~~from ~~was~~our ~~$984,~~research ~~compared~~and todevelopment ~~$0 as at December 31, 2013~~activities.

As at December 31, 2014, the Company had total liabilities of $1,482,943 compared with total liabilities of $978,279 at December 31, 2013. The increase in liabilities is attributed to an increase of $42,788 in accounts payable and an increase of $60,000 due to the Director of the Company for unpaid management fees, the increase of $290,362 due to convertible loans obtained during 2014, and the increase of $114,649 due to the derivative liabilities related to the convertible debt carried at fair value. The above increases were offset by decrease of $3,135 in related party loans due to repayments during 2014.·

AsIf atwe ~~December~~fail ~~31,~~to ~~2014,~~compete ~~the~~effectively ~~Company had a working capital deficit of $1,481,959 compared with a working capital deficit of $978,279 as at December 31, 2013. The increase~~ in the ~~working~~intensely ~~capital~~competitive ~~deficit~~medical issoftware ~~attributed~~area, toour ~~higher~~operations ~~unpaid~~and ~~obligations~~market ~~due~~position towill ~~lack~~be ofnegatively ~~sufficient cash flow~~impacted.

~~Going Concern~~·

~~Our~~If ~~ability~~we fail to ~~continue~~successfully asexecute ~~a going concern is contingent upon~~ our ~~ability~~planned topartnering ~~secure additional financing, increase ownership equity~~ and ~~attain~~out-licensing ~~profitable~~of ~~operations.~~products Inor ~~addition~~technologies, our ~~ability~~future toperformance ~~continue~~will ~~as a going concern must~~ be ~~considered~~adversely ~~in light of the problems, expenses and complications frequently encountered in established markets and the competitive environment in which we operate~~affected.

~~Uncertainties and Trends~~·

~~Our~~The ~~operations~~recent economic downturn and ~~possible~~related ~~revenues~~credit ~~are~~and ~~dependent~~financial ~~now~~market crisis may adversely affect our ability to obtain financing, conduct our operations and inrealize ~~the~~opportunities ~~future~~to ~~upon~~successfully ~~the~~bring ~~following~~our ~~factors:~~technologies to market.

~~Whether~~Software weindustry ~~successfully~~related ~~develop~~litigation is substantial and ~~commercialize~~may ~~products~~continue ~~from~~to ~~our~~rise, ~~research~~leading to greater costs and ~~development~~unpredictable ~~activities~~litigation.

If we fail to ~~compete~~comply ~~effectively~~with inextensive ~~the~~legal/regulatory ~~intensely~~requirements ~~competitive~~affecting the medical software ~~area~~industry, ~~our~~we ~~operations~~will ~~and~~face ~~market~~increased ~~position~~costs, ~~will~~and bepossibly ~~negatively~~penalties ~~impacted~~and business losses.

·Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

IfWe wehave ~~fail~~not toentered ~~successfully~~into ~~execute~~any ~~our~~transaction, ~~planned~~agreement ~~partnering~~or ~~and~~other ~~out-licensing~~contractual ofarrangement ~~products~~with oran ~~technologies,~~entity ~~our~~unconsolidated ~~future~~with ~~performance~~us ~~will~~under bewhom ~~adversely~~we ~~affected.~~have:

~~The~~An ~~recent~~obligation ~~economic~~under ~~downturn~~a ~~and~~guarantee ~~related credit and financial market crisis may adversely affect our ability to obtain financing, conduct our operations and realize opportunities to successfully bring our technologies to market~~contract.

~~Software~~A ~~industry~~retained ~~related~~or ~~litigation~~contingent isinterest ~~substantial~~in ~~and~~assets ~~may~~transferred ~~continue~~ to ~~rise~~the unconsolidated entity or similar arrangement that serves as credit, ~~leading~~liquidity or market risk support to ~~greater~~such ~~costs~~entity ~~and~~for ~~unpredictable~~such ~~litigation~~assets.

17·

·Any obligation, including a contingent obligation, under a contract that would be accounted for as a derivative instrument.

~~If we fail to comply with extensive legal/regulatory requirements affecting the medical software industry, we will face increased costs, and possibly penalties and business losses.~~·

~~Off-Balance~~Any ~~Sheet~~obligation, ~~Arrangements~~including a contingent obligation, arising out of a variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that is held by us and material to us where such entity provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to, or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with us.

We ~~have~~do not ~~entered~~have ~~into~~ any ~~transaction~~off-balance sheet arrangements or commitments that have a current or future effect on its financial condition, ~~agreement~~changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources that is material, other ~~contractual~~than ~~arrangement~~those ~~with~~which anmay ~~entity~~be ~~unconsolidated~~disclosed ~~with~~in usthis ~~under~~Management’s ~~whom~~Discussion weand ~~have:~~Analysis of Financial Condition and the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes.

An obligation under a guarantee contract.

A retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to the unconsolidated entity or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support to such entity for such assets.

Any obligation, including a contingent obligation, under a contract that would be accounted for as a derivative instrument.

Any obligation, including a contingent obligation, arising out of a variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that is held by us and material to us where such entity provides financing, liquidity, market risk or credit risk support to, or engages in leasing, hedging or research and development services with us.

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements or commitments that have a current or future effect on its financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures, or capital resources that is material, other than those which may be disclosed in this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and related notes.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Not applicable. We have no investments in market risk sensitive instruments or in any other type securities.

1814

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Consolidated Financial Statements

For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Deficit for the Years Ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	16

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2015 and 2014	17

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014	18

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014	19

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit for the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014	20

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	21

1915

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors

DMH International, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of DMH International, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 and the related statements of operations, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company'’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company'’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall consolidated financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of DMH International, Inc. as of December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 and the results of its operations and cash flows for the periods described above in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company suffered a net loss from operations and has a net capital deficiency, which raises substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding those matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ M&K CPAS, PLLC

www.mkacpas.com

Houston, Texas

~~April~~May 135, ~~2015~~2016

2016

DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	December 31,
	2014	2013
	2015	2014
	$	$
ASSETS
Cash	~~984~~40	-984
Total Assets	~~984~~40	-984
LIABILITIES
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	~~266~~249,~~806~~965	~~224~~266,~~018~~806
Accounts payable – related party	~~281~~341,522	~~221~~281,522
Due to related parties	~~529~~661,~~604~~954	~~532~~529,~~739~~604
Convertible debt-net of discount of $27,200 and $0, respectively	290,362	-
Convertible debt-net of discount of $18,055 and $27,200, respectively	31,945	290,362
Derivative liability	114,649	-
Convertible debt in default	31,000	-
Total Liabilities	1,482,943	978,279
Derivative liability	132,287	114,649
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Total Liabilities	1,448,673	1,482,943
STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT )
Preferred stock
Authorized: 10,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $0.001 per share; Issued and outstanding: nil preferred shares	-	-
Authorized: 10,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $0.001 per share; Issued and outstanding: 7,432,099 and 0 preferred shares at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.	7,432	-
Common stock	~~352~~415,~~000~~962	~~271~~352,~~500~~000
Authorized: 450,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.001 per share Issued and outstanding: 351,999,486 and 271,500,000 common shares at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
Authorized: 450,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.001 per share Issued and outstanding: 415,961,936 and 351,999,486 common shares at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
Preferred stock issuable	1410,~~600,000~~864	-1,600,000
Common stock issuable	35,000	-35,000
Additional paid-in capital	12,~~380~~900,~~309~~662	~~870~~1,~~852~~380,309
Deficit accumulated	(4,849,268)	(2,120,631)
Accumulated deficit	(5,218,553)	(4,849,268)
Total Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)	(1,~~481~~448,~~959~~633)	(~~978~~1,~~279~~481,959)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)	~~984~~40	-984

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements)

2117

DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

	For the years Ended
	For the years ended
	December 31,
	2014	2013
	2015	2014
	$	$
Revenues	-	-
Operating Expenses
General and administrative	3428,~~164~~194	3634,~~487~~162
Management fees	60,000	60,000
Professional fees	~~691~~124,~~651~~491	~~947~~691,~~857~~651
Research and development	8718,~~698~~241	-87,698
Impairment of goodwill	~~1,610,353~~-	-1,610,353
Total Operating Expenses	2230,~~483,864~~926	12,~~044~~483,~~344~~864
Other Expenses
Interest expense	~~191~~68,~~202~~266	-191,202
Change in fair value of derivatives	428,~~506~~172	-4,506
Gain on settlement of debt	(1030,~~226~~454)	-(10,226)
Imputed interest	5972,~~291~~375	5759,~~234~~291
Total Other Expenses	~~244~~138,~~773~~359	57244,~~234~~773
Net Loss	(2369,~~728,637~~285)	(12,~~101~~728,~~578~~637)
Net Loss per Share – Basic and Diluted	(0.0100)	(0.01)
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding – Basic and Diluted	~~301~~406,~~299~~089,~~705~~688	~~212~~301,~~468~~299,~~493~~705

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements)

2218

DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

For Years Ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014

		Common				Additional		Preferred		Common
									Additional		Preferred		Common
		Stock		Par		Paid-In		Stock		Stock		Deficit
	Preferred Stock				Common Stock				Paid-In		Stock		Stock		Deficit
	Shares	~~Shares~~	Par Value	~~Value~~	Shares	~~Capital~~	Par Value	~~Issuable~~	Capital	~~Issuable~~	Issuable	~~Accumulated~~	Issuable	~~Total~~	Accumulated	Total
	#	#	$	$	#	$	$		$			$		$	$	$
Balance – December 31, 2012		161,000,000		161,000		(85,532)		-		-		(1,019,053)		(943,585)
Balance – December 31, 2013	-		-		271,500,000		271,500		870,852						(2,120,631)	(978,279)
Imputed Interest	-	-	-	-	-	~~57,234~~	-	-	59,291	-	-	-	-	~~57,234~~	-	59,291
Common stock issued in a private placement	-	~~39,500,000~~	-	~~39,500~~	12,000,000	~~315,500~~	12,000	-	73,000	-	-	-	-	~~355,000~~	-	85,000
Common stock issued for services	-	~~71,000,000~~	-	~~71,000~~	26,500,000	~~583,650~~	26,500	-	258,500	-	-	-	35,000	~~654,650~~	-	320,000
Net loss for the period		-		-		-		-		-		(1,101,578)		(1,101,578)
Common stock issued for debt conversions	-		-		41,999,486		42,000		20,212		-		-		-	62,212
Balance – December 31, 2013		271,500,000		271,500		870,852						(2,120,631)		(978,279)
Settlement of derivative liability due to conversions	-		-		-		-		98,454		-		-		-	98,454
Imputed Interest		-		-		59,291		-		-		-		59,291
Preferred stock issuable	-		-		-		-		-		1,600,000		-		-	1,600,000
Common stock issued in a private placement		12,000,000		12,000		73,000		-		-		-		85,000
Net loss for the period	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		(2,728,637)	(2,728,637)
Common stock issued for services		26,500,000		26,500		258,500		-		35,000		-		320,000
Balance – December 31, 2014	-		-		351,999,486		352,000		1,380,309		1,600,000		35,000		(4,849,268)	(1,481,959)
Common stock issued for debt conversions		41,999,486		42,000		20,212		-		-		-		62,212
Imputed Interest	-		-		-		-		72,375		-		-		-	72,375
Settlement of derivative liability due to conversions		-		-		98,454		-		-		-		98,454
Common stock issued for debt conversions	-		-		63,962,450		63,962		205,740		-		-		-	269,702
Preferred stock issuable		-		-		-		1,600,000		-		-		1,600,000
Settlement of derivative liability due to conversions	-		-		-		-		60,534		-		-		-	60,534
Net loss for the period		-		-		-		-		-		(2,728,637)		(2,728,637)
Preferred stock issued	7,432,099		7,432		-		-		1,181,704		(1,189,136)		-		-	-
Balance – December 31, 2014		351,999,486		352,000		1,380,309		1,600,000		35,000		(4,849,268)		(1,481,959)
Net loss for the period	-		-		-		-		-		-		-		(369,285)	(369,285)
Balance – December 31, 2015	7,432,099		7,432		415,961,936		415,962		2,900,662		410,864		35,000		(5,218,553)	(1,448,633)

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements)

2319

DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

	For the years ended December 31,
	2014	2013
	2015	2014
	$	$
Operating Activities
Net loss for the period	(2369,~~728,637~~285)	(12,~~101~~728,~~578~~637)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Imputed interest	5972,~~291~~375	5759,~~234~~291
Amortization of debt discount	~~181~~59,~~397~~145	-181,397
Change in fair value of derivatives	428,~~506~~172	-4,506
Impairment of goodwill	~~1,610,353~~-	1,610,353
Gain on settlement of convertible debt	(1030,~~226~~454)	(10,226)
Stock issued for services	~~320,000~~-	~~654~~320,~~650~~000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts Payable – Related Party	60,000	60,000
Accounts payable and Accrued liabilities	42(3,~~788~~247)	5942,~~134~~788
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities	(~~460~~183,~~528~~294)	(~~270~~460,~~560~~528)
Investing Activities
Cash acquired in merger	~~11,947~~-	-11,947
Advance paid in connection with merger	~~(20,000)~~-	(20,000)
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities	~~(8,053)~~-	-(8,053)
Financing Activities
Due to related parties – borrowings	58168,~~865~~850	3758,~~500~~865
Due to related parties – repayments	(6436,~~300~~500)	(~~122~~64,~~004~~300)
Proceeds from loan	390,000	-
Proceeds from convertible debt	50,000	390,000
Proceeds from common stock subscribed	~~85,000~~-	~~355~~85,000
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities	~~469~~182,~~565~~350	~~270~~469,~~496~~565
Increase (decrease) in Cash	984	(64)
Increase(decrease) in Cash	(944)	984
Cash – Beginning of Period	-984	64-
Cash – End of Period	~~984~~40	-984
Non-cash financing activities:
Common stocks issued for debt conversions	72,438	-
Common stock issued for debt conversions	300,156	72,438
Settlement of derivative liability due to conversions	98,454	-
Settlement of derivative liability due to equity conversions	60,534	98,454
Recognition of derivative liability	208,597
Recognition of discount due to derivative	50,000	208,597
Preferred shares issued from payables	1,189,136	-

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements)

2420

DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

1. Description of Business and Reverse Acquisition

Description of Business

DMH International, Inc. (the “Company”) was incorporated in the state of Florida on March 26, 2010.

Going Concern

These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies that the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. During the ~~years~~year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015, the Company has a working capital deficit of $1,~~481~~448,~~959~~633 and accumulated deficit of $45,~~849~~218,~~268~~553. The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its management, and its ability to identify future investment opportunities and obtain the necessary debt or equity financing, and generating profitable operations from the Company’s future operations. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

Reverse Acquisition

On December 11, 2012, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement with DMH International, Inc. (“DMHI”), a public shell company. Pursuant to the agreement, DMHI acquired all of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company (100 common shares) by issuing 125,000,000 common shares, comprised of 100,000,000 common shares from the President and Director of the Company and 25,000,000 newly issued common shares. Furthermore, the President and Director of DMHI cancelled 100,000,000 common shares as part of the share exchange agreement. As a result of the share exchange, the former shareholders of the Company controlled approximately 78% of the issued and outstanding common shares of DMHI resulting in a change in control. The transaction was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization transaction, as DMHI qualifies as a non-operating public shell company given the fact that the Company held nominal net monetary assets, consisting of only cash at the time of merger transaction. As Touch Medical Solutions, Inc. is deemed to be the purchaser for accounting purposes under recapitalization accounting, the equity of the Company is presented as the equity of the combined company and the capital stock account of the Company is adjusted to reflect the part value of the outstanding and issued common stock of the legal acquirer (DMHI) after giving effect to the number of shares issued in the share exchange agreement. Shares retained by DMHI are reflected as an issuance as of the acquisition date for the historical amount of the net assets of the acquired entity, which in this case is zero.

Merger

Effective July 22, 2014, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Virtual Physician'’s Network through issuance of 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s convertible preferred stock. Each share of our preferred stock is convertible into 20 shares of our common stock. Virtual Physician'’s Network was merged into the Company and became the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary. As of December 31, ~~2014~~2015, ~~these~~7,432,099 shares were issued, and the remaining shares have not been issued due to administrative delay. The 10remaining 2,~~000~~567,~~000~~901 shares of convertible preferred stocks were accrued in preferred stocks issuable with a fair value of $1410,~~600,000~~864. Each share of convertible preferred stock was valued at 20 times of closing price of common stock price of $0.008 on the date of merger.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation

The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”) and are expressed in U.S. dollars. All the intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The Company’s fiscal year end is December 31.

~~Use of Estimates~~21

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to the useful life and valuation of long-lived assets, and deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.

DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Use of Estimates

Cash and cash equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents. As at December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, the Company had no cash equivalents.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is comprised of computer equipment and is recorded at cost. The Company amortizes the cost of equipment on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives of three years. The Company reviews all property and equipment for impairment annually.

Goodwill

The Company evaluates the carrying value of goodwill during the fourth quarter of each year and between annual evaluations if events occur or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of the reporting unit below its carrying amount. Such circumstances could include, but are not limited to (1) a significant adverse change in legal factors or in business climate, (2) unanticipated competition, or (3) an adverse action or assessment by a regulator. When evaluating whether goodwill is impaired, the Company compares the fair value of the reporting unit to which the goodwill is assigned to the reporting unit'’s carrying amount, including goodwill. The fair value of the reporting unit is estimated using a combination of the income, or discounted cash flows, approach and the market approach, which utilizes comparable companies'’ data. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, then the amount of the impairment loss must be measured. The impairment loss would be calculated by comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill to its carrying amount. In calculating the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill, the fair value of the reporting unit is allocated to all of the other assets and liabilities of that unit based on their fair values. The excess of the fair value of a reporting unit over the amount assigned to its other assets and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. An impairment loss would be recognized when the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value. The Company'’s evaluation of goodwill completed during the 2014 year end resulted in an impairment loss of $1,610,353.

Revenue Recognition

Revenue will be recognized only when the price is fixed and determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service has been provided, and collectability is assured. The Company is not exposed to any credit risks as amounts are prepaid prior to performance of services.

Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Share

The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings per Share. ASC 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti dilutive. As of December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, the Company has 220,478,979 and 262,244,458 ~~and 0~~ shares convertible under note ~~agreement~~agreements that are anti-dilutive and not included in diluted loss per share.

DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

Financial Instruments

The Company adopted the FASB standard related to fair value measurement at inception. The standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements. The standard applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and, accordingly, does not require any new fair value measurements. The standard clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. The recorded values of long-term debt approximate their fair values, as interest approximates market rates. As a basis for considering such assumptions, the standard established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows.

Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

Level 2. Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

The Company’s financial instruments are cash, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and amounts due to related parties. The recorded values of cash, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and amounts due to related parties approximate their fair values based on their short-term nature.

The following table presents assets and liabilities that were measured and recognized at fair value as of December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~December~~2014 ~~31, 2013~~ on a recurring basis:

		Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015
Description		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Realized Loss
Derivative Liability	$	-	$	-	$	132,287	$	28,172
Totals	$	-	$	-	$	132,287	$	28,172
		Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014
Description		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Realized Loss
Derivative Liability	$	-	$	-	$	114,649	$	-4,506
Totals	$	-	$	-	$	114,649	$	-4,506
		Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013
Description		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Realized Loss
Derivative Liability	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Totals	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-

Income Taxes

Potential benefits of income tax losses are not recognized in the accounts until realization is more likely than not. The Company has adopted ASC 740 “Accounting for Income Taxes” as of its inception. Pursuant to ASC 740, the Company is required to compute tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefits of net operating losses have not been recognized in this financial statement because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

On November 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-16—Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this Update do not change the current criteria in GAAP for determining when separation of certain embedded derivative features in a hybrid financial instrument is required. That is, an entity will continue to evaluate whether the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative feature are clearly and closely related to those of the host contract, among other relevant criteria. The amendments clarify how current GAAP should be interpreted in evaluating the economic characteristics and risks of a host contract in a hybrid financial instrument that is issued in the form of a share. The effects of initially adopting the amendments in this Update should be applied on a modified retrospective basis to existing hybrid financial instruments issued in the form of a share as of the beginning of the fiscal year for which the amendments are effective. Retrospective application is permitted to all relevant prior periods.

On November 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-17—Business Combinations (Topic 805): Pushdown Accounting (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this Update provide an acquired entity with an option to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements upon occurrence of an event in which an acquirer obtains control of the acquired entity. The amendments in this Update are effective on November 18, 2014. After the effective date, an acquired entity can make an election to apply the guidance to future change-in-control events or to its most recent change-in-control event. However, if the financial statements for the period in which the most recent change-in-control event occurred already have been issued or made available to be issued, the application of this guidance would be a change in accounting principle.23

On August 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements – Going Concerns (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosures of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The amendments require management to assess an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management’s plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management’s plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). The amendments in this Update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.

DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-10, “Development Stage Entities”. The amendments in this update remove the definition of a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the ASC thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. GAAP. In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage. The amendments in this update are applied retrospectively. The early adoption of ASU 2014-10 removed the development stage entity financial reporting requirements from the Company.

In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-12, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. The new guidance requires that share-based compensation that require a specific performance target to be achieved in order for employees to become eligible to vest in the awards and that could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation costs should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this Update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10: Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation , to improve financial reporting by reducing the cost and complexity associated with the incremental reporting requirements of development stage entities. The amendments in this update remove all incremental financial reporting requirements from U.S. GAAP for development stage entities, thereby improving financial reporting by eliminating the cost and complexity associated with providing that information. The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entity in the development stage. The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public companies, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-10 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.24

In July 2013, FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, "Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists." The provisions of ASU No. 2013-11 require an entity to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or portion thereof, in the statement of financial position as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward or a tax credit carryforward, with certain exceptions related to availability. ASU No. 2013-11 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-11 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.

In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013-02, Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income into net income. The amendments in the ASU do not change the current requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S. GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to:

DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued)

·In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10: Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Elimination of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation , to improve financial reporting by reducing the cost and complexity associated with the incremental reporting requirements of development stage entities. The amendments in this update remove all incremental financial reporting requirements from U.S. GAAP for development stage entities, thereby improving financial reporting by eliminating the cost and complexity associated with providing that information. The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity on the basis of the amount of investment equity that is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entity in the development stage. The amendments related to the elimination of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public companies, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU 2014-10 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Present (either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and

Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension-related amounts) instead of directly to income or expense.

The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-02 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-01, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011-11. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011-11 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011-11, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013-01 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.

3. Related Party Transactions

As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company owes $89,216 to the CFO of the Company. The amounts owing are unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand. Imputed interest at 8% has been expensed and recorded as additional paid-in capital of $7,137 and $7,555 for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, $180,000 and $120,000 included in accounts payable is the management fees owed to CFO, respectively. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, $101,522 included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities is owed to a company formerly controlled by the CFO of the Company. These amounts owing are unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand. Imputed interest at 8% has been expensed and recorded as additional paid-in capital of $19,533 and $14,694 for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.)

As of December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, the Company owes $~~438~~89,~~088~~216 ~~and $443,523, respectively~~ to the ~~CEO~~director, ~~and~~former ~~companies~~CFO ~~controlled~~of bythe ~~him~~Company. The amounts owing are unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand. ~~The~~Imputed ~~amount~~interest ~~owing~~at 8% has anbeen ~~imputed~~expensed and recorded as additional paid-in capital of 7,137 for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, $240,000 and $180,000 included in accounts payable is the management fees owed to the director, former CFO, respectively. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, $101,522 included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities is owed to a company formerly controlled by the director, former CFO of the Company. These amounts owing are unsecured, non-interest atbearing, 8%and due on demand. Imputed interest at 8% has been expensed and recorded as additional paid-in capital of $3224,~~621~~333 and $2619,~~193~~533 for the years ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, respectively.

~~As of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company owes $2,300 and $0, respectively to a company controlled by a shareholder of the Company.~~b)

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company owes $522,938 and $438,088, respectively to the CFO, former CEO and the companies controlled by him. The amounts owing are unsecured, non-interest bearing, and due on demand. The amount owing has an imputed interest at 8%. Imputed interest at 8% has been expensed and recorded as additional paid-in capital of $37,720 and $32,621 for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company owes $2,300 to a company controlled by a shareholder of the Company. On May 12, 2015, the 850,017 convertible preferred shares were issued to this shareholder of the Company pursuant to the merger agreement at the price of $0.16 per share.

As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company owes $47,500 and $0, respectively to the CEO of the Company. The amount owing has an imputed interest at 8%. Imputed interest at 8% has been expensed and recorded as additional paid-in capital of $3,185 and $0 for the year ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. On May 12, 2015, the 1,133,356 preferred shares were issued to the CEO of the Company pursuant to the merger agreement at the price of $0.16 per share.

4. Convertible Notes

On March 3, 2014, the Company issued a convertible redeemable Note in the amount of $40,000. The proceeds were received on March 7, 2014. The Note carries interest at 9% annum and matures on March 3, 2015. The Note holder is entitled to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price of 58% the average two lowest closing bid price in the 20 trading days prior to the conversion date. ~~During~~In connection with the ~~year~~issuance ~~ended~~of ~~December~~this ~~31,~~convertible ~~2014~~note, the ~~debt~~Company ~~holder~~encountered ~~made~~a ~~four~~day-one ~~conversions~~derivative loss of a$13,839. ~~total~~The ofconvertible 22note payable,~~106,486~~ ~~shares~~at offair ~~the~~value, ~~company’s~~was ~~restricted~~recorded ~~stock~~at ~~satisfying~~ $4053,~~000~~839 ofon the ~~note~~issuance ~~with~~date. aIn ~~fair~~addition, ~~value~~the proceeds of $8940,~~441,~~000 ~~included~~attributable into the ~~fair~~ value of ~~debt~~the ~~balance~~call ofoption ~~$89,441~~embedded ~~was~~in ~~settlement~~the ofnote ~~derivative~~was ~~liability~~recorded ofas ~~$49,441.~~a ~~The~~debt ~~Company~~discount ~~recorded~~and aamortized ~~loss~~over the term of ~~$2,324~~the ~~for~~note ~~additional~~under ~~shares~~the ~~issued~~interest ~~during~~method. ~~the~~The ~~conversion~~debt ~~than~~discount ~~what~~of $40,000 was ~~called~~fully ~~for~~amortized induring the ~~original~~year ~~agreement~~ended ~~(See~~December ~~Note~~31, 6)2014.

On March 31, 2014, the Company issued a convertible redeemable Note in the amount of $50,000. The proceeds were received on April 2, 2014. The Note carries interest at 9% annum and matures on March 31, 2015. The Note holder is entitled to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price of 55% the average two lowest closing bid price in the 20 trading days prior to the conversion date. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the debt holder made four conversions of a total of 19,893,000 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying $32,438 of the note with a fair value of $81,451, included in the fair value of debt balance of $81,451 was settlement of derivative liability of $49,013.The Company recorded a gain of $12,550 for less shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement (See Note 6).25

DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

4. Convertible Notes (~~Continued~~continued)

OnDuring ~~May~~the 5year ended December 31, 2014, the ~~Company~~debt ~~issued~~holder amade ~~convertible~~four ~~redeemable~~conversions ~~Note~~of ina ~~the~~total ~~amount~~ of ~~$50~~22,~~000.~~106,486 ~~The~~shares ~~proceeds~~of ~~were~~the ~~received~~company’s onrestricted ~~May~~stock 7satisfying $40,000 ~~2014.~~of ~~The~~the ~~Note~~note ~~carries~~with ~~interest~~a atfair 9%value ~~annum~~of ~~and~~$89,441, ~~matures~~included onin ~~March~~the ~~31,~~fair ~~2015.~~value ~~The~~of ~~Note~~debt ~~holder~~balance isof ~~entitled~~$89,441 towas ~~convert~~settlement ~~all~~of orderivative aliability ~~portion~~ of ~~the~~$49,441. ~~principal~~The ~~into~~Company ~~shares~~recorded ofa ~~common~~loss ~~stock~~of at$2,324 afor ~~conversion~~additional ~~price~~shares ofissued ~~55%~~during the ~~average~~conversion ~~two~~than ~~lowest~~what ~~closing~~was ~~bid~~called ~~price~~for in the 20original ~~trading~~agreement ~~days~~(See ~~prior~~Note ~~to the conversion date~~6).

On ~~July~~March 2531, 2014, the Company issued a convertible redeemable Note in the amount of $~~250~~50,000. ~~$125,000~~The ~~each of the~~ proceeds ~~was~~were received on ~~June~~April 252, 2014 ~~and July 25, 2014, respectively (Total $250,000)~~. The Note carries interest at 89% annum and ~~matured~~matures on ~~January~~March 2531, 2015. The Note holder is entitled to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price of ~~the lower of $0.01 or 60~~55% the average ~~three~~two lowest ~~VWAP~~closing ~~prices~~bid price in the 1520 trading days prior to the conversion date. ~~The~~In ~~Holder~~connection ~~shall~~with ~~not~~the beissuance ~~entitled~~of tothis ~~convert~~convertible note, the ~~Note~~Company inencountered ~~connection~~a ~~with~~day-one ~~that~~derivative ~~number~~loss of ~~shares~~$13,171. ofThe ~~Common~~convertible ~~Stock~~note ~~which~~payable, ~~would~~at befair invalue, ~~excess~~was ofrecorded at $63,171 on the ~~sum~~issuance ofdate. ~~(i)~~In addition, the ~~number~~proceeds of ~~shares~~$50,000 attributable to the value of ~~Common~~the ~~Stock~~call ~~beneficially~~option ~~owned~~embedded byin the ~~Holder~~note ~~and~~was ~~its~~recorded ~~affiliates~~as on a ~~Conversion~~debt ~~Date,~~discount and ~~(ii)~~amortized over the ~~number~~term of ~~shares~~the ofnote ~~Common~~under ~~Stock~~the ~~issuable~~interest ~~upon~~method. Amortization for the ~~conversion~~years ofended ~~the~~December ~~Note~~31, ~~would~~2015 ~~result~~and in2014 ~~beneficial~~is ~~ownership~~$2,660 byand $47,340, respectively. During the ~~Holder~~year ~~and~~ended ~~its~~December ~~affiliates~~31, of2014, ~~more~~the ~~than~~debt ~~4.99%~~holder made four conversions of ~~the~~a ~~issued~~total ~~and~~of ~~outstanding~~19,893,000 shares of ~~Common~~the ~~Stock~~company’s restricted stock satisfying $32,438 of the ~~Borrower~~note onwith ~~such~~a ~~Conversion~~fair ~~Date.~~value ~~Also~~of $81,451, included in the ~~aggregate~~fair ~~conversion~~value byof ~~the~~debt ~~Holder~~balance ~~may~~of ~~not~~$81,451 ~~exceed~~was 9settlement of derivative liability of $49,013.~~99%~~The ifCompany recorded a ~~form~~gain ~~13d~~of or$12,550 ~~equivalent~~for isless ~~filed~~shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement. AsDuring ~~described~~the ~~above~~year ended December 31, 2015, the ~~note~~debt ~~matured~~holder onmade ~~January~~two 25conversions of a total of 19,962,450 ~~2015~~shares ~~but~~of ~~was~~the ~~satisfied~~company’s restricted stock satisfying the remaining $17,562 of the note in full with 25a fair value of $46,~~000~~450,~~000~~ ~~shares~~included in the fair value of ~~common~~debt ~~stocks~~balance ~~per~~of $46,450 was settlement ~~agreement~~of onderivative ~~January~~liability 28of $26,488. ~~2015~~The Company recorded a gain of $10,468 for less shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement (See Note 96).

InOn ~~the~~May ~~evaluation~~5, of2014, the ~~financing~~Company ~~arrangements,~~issued ~~the~~a ~~Company~~convertible ~~concluded~~redeemable ~~that~~Note in the ~~conversion~~amount ~~features~~of ~~did~~$50,000. ~~not~~The ~~meet~~proceeds ~~the~~were ~~conditions~~received ~~set~~on ~~forth~~May in7, ~~current~~2014. ~~accounting~~The ~~standards~~Note ~~for~~carries ~~equity~~interest ~~classification.~~at ~~Since~~9% ~~equity~~annum ~~classification~~and ismatured ~~not~~on ~~available~~May ~~for~~5, ~~the~~2015. ~~conversion~~The ~~feature,~~Company itcontinued ~~requires~~to ~~bifurcation~~accrue ~~and~~the ~~liability~~default ~~classification,~~interest rate at ~~fair value~~16%. ~~The~~At ~~Company~~December ~~elected~~31, to2015 ~~account~~and ~~for~~2014, the ~~hybrid~~accrued ~~contract~~interest ~~under~~was ~~the~~$0 ~~guidance~~and of$5,333, ~~ASC 815-15-25-4~~respectively. The ~~fair~~Note ~~values~~holder is entitled to convert all or a portion of the ~~Company’s~~principal ~~derivative~~into ~~liabilities~~shares ~~were~~of ~~estimated~~common stock at a conversion price of 55% the ~~issuance~~average ~~date~~two ~~and~~lowest ~~are~~closing ~~revalued~~bid atprice ~~each~~in ~~subsequent~~the ~~reporting~~20 ~~date,~~trading ~~using~~days aprior ~~binomial~~to ~~option~~the ~~pricing~~conversion ~~model~~date. In connection with the issuance of ~~these~~this convertible ~~notes payable~~note, the Company encountered a day-one derivative loss of $4114,~~902~~892. ~~related~~The toconvertible ~~the~~note ~~recognition~~payable, ofat ~~(i)~~fair ~~the~~value, ~~hybrid~~was ~~note~~recorded ~~and~~at ~~(ii)~~$54,892 on the ~~derivative~~issuance ~~instrument~~date. ~~arising~~In ~~from~~addition, the ~~fair~~proceeds ~~value~~of ~~measurement~~$50,000 ~~due~~attributable to the ~~fair~~ value of the ~~hybrid~~call ~~note~~option ~~and~~ embedded ~~derivative~~in ~~exceeding~~ the ~~proceeds~~note ~~that~~was ~~the~~recorded ~~Company~~as ~~received~~a ~~from~~debt ~~the~~discount ~~arrangement.~~and ~~Therefore,~~amortized over the ~~Company~~term ~~was~~of ~~required~~the tonote ~~record~~under ~~a loss on~~ the ~~derivative~~interest ~~financial instrument~~method. InAmortization ~~addition,~~for the ~~fair~~years ~~value~~ended ~~will~~December ~~change~~31, in2015 ~~future~~and ~~periods~~2014 is $16,528 ~~based~~and ~~upon~~$33,472, ~~changes~~respectively. inDuring the ~~Company’s~~year ~~common~~ended ~~stock~~December ~~price~~31, ~~and~~2015, ~~changes~~the indebt ~~other~~holder ~~assumptions~~made ~~and~~a ~~market~~conversion ~~indicators~~of ~~used~~a intotal ~~the~~of ~~valuation~~19,000,000 ~~techniques.~~shares ~~These~~of ~~future~~the ~~changes~~company’s ~~will~~restricted bestock ~~recognized~~satisfying in$19,000 ~~changes~~of inthe note with a fair value of ~~derivatives~~$25,769, onincluded in the ~~Company’s~~fair ~~statement~~value of ~~operations. At~~debt ~~December~~balance ~~31,~~of ~~2014~~$25,769 ~~these~~was ~~convertible~~settlement ~~note~~of ~~payable,~~derivative atliability ~~fair~~of ~~value, were recorded at~~ $~~114~~25,~~649 (See Note 5)~~769.The ~~Accordingly,~~Company ~~the~~recorded ~~company~~a ~~recognized~~ gain of $431,~~506~~091 infor ~~changes~~less inshares ~~fair~~issued ~~value~~during ofthe ~~derivative~~conversion onthan ~~the~~what ~~Company’s~~was ~~statement~~called offor ~~operations~~in atthe ~~December~~original ~~31,~~agreement ~~2014~~(See Note 6).

InOn ~~addition~~May 15, 2015, the ~~proceeds~~Company issued a convertible redeemable Note in the amount of $~~208~~50,~~597~~000. ~~received~~The asNote carries interest at 9% annum and matures on May 15, 2016. The Note holder is entitled to convert all or a ~~result~~portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price of 55% the average two lowest closing bid price in the 20 trading days prior to the conversion date. In connection with the issuance of ~~these~~this convertible ~~notes~~note, isthe Company encountered a day-one derivative loss of $6,021. The convertible note payable, at fair value, was recorded at $56,021 on the issuance date. In addition, the proceeds of $50,000 attributable to the value of the call option embedded in the note, ~~which~~ was recorded as a debt discount and ~~will be~~ amortized over the term of the note under the interest method. Amortization for the ~~year~~years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 is $~~181~~31,~~397~~944 and $0, respectively.

On July 25, 2014, the Company issued a convertible redeemable Note in the amount of $250,000. $125,000 each of the proceeds was received on June 25, 2014 and July 25, 2014, respectively (Total $250,000). The Note carries interest at 8% annum and matured on January 25, 2015. The Note holder is entitled to convert all or a portion of the principal into shares of common stock at a conversion price of the lower of $0.01 or 60% the average three lowest VWAP prices in the 15 trading days prior to the conversion date. The Holder shall not be entitled to convert the Note in connection with that number of shares of Common Stock which would be in excess of the sum of (i) the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by the Holder and its affiliates on a Conversion Date, and (ii) the number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon the conversion of the Note would result in beneficial ownership by the Holder and its affiliates of more than 4.99% of the issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock of the Borrower on such Conversion Date. Also, the aggregate conversion by the Holder may not exceed 9.99% if a form 13d or equivalent is filed. In connection with the issuance of this convertible note, the Company encountered a day-one derivative gain of $68,597. The convertible note payable, at fair value, was recorded at $181,403 on the issuance date. In addition, the debt discount of $68,597 was amortized over the term of the note under the interest method. Amortization for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 is $8,014 and $60,583, respectively. The accrued interest at December 31, 2015 and 2014 was $0 and $5,111, respectively. ~~Derivative~~ ~~Liabilities~~On January 28, 2015, the note was satisfied in full with 25,000,000 shares of common stocks per settlement agreement with a fair value of $269,471, included in the fair value of debt balance of $269,471 was accrued interest of $11,194 and settlement of derivative liability of $8,277. The Company recorded a loss of $11,105 for more shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement.

As discussed in Note 4 under Convertible Notes, the Company issued convertible notes payable that provide for the issuance of convertible notes with variable conversion provisions. The number of shares of common stock to be issued is based on the future price of the Company’s common stock. The number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the note is indeterminate. Pursuant to ASC 815-15 Embedded Derivatives, the fair values of the variable conversion shares to be issued were recorded as derivative liabilities on the issuance date. The fair values of the Company’s derivative liabilities were estimated at the issuance date and are revalued at each subsequent reporting date, using a binomial option pricing model. The changes in fair value of derivatives for $4,506 on the Company’s statement of operations consisted of a loss of $41,902 due to the value in excess of the face value of the convertible notes and a gain of $37,396 attributable to market value of the convertible notes. 26

The following is a summary of changes in the fair market value of the derivative liability during the years ended December 31, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013, respectively:

		Derivative Liability Convertible Debts Total
Balance, December 31, 2013	$	-
Increase in derivative value due to issuances of convertible promissory notes		208,597
Decrease in derivative value due to issuances of common stocks for conversions		(98,454)
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities due to the mark to market adjustment		4,506
Balance, December 31, 2014	$	114,649

DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

4. Convertible Notes (continued)

In the evaluation of the financing arrangements, the Company concluded that the conversion features did not meet the conditions set forth in current accounting standards for equity classification. Since equity classification is not available for the conversion feature, it requires bifurcation and liability classification, at fair value. The Company elected to account for the hybrid contract under the guidance of ASC 815-15-25-4. The fair values of the Company’s derivative liabilities were estimated at the issuance date and are revalued at each subsequent reporting date, using a binomial option pricing model. In connection with the issuance of these convertible notes payable, the Company encountered a day-one derivative loss of $41,902 related to the recognition of (i) the hybrid note and (ii) the derivative instrument arising from the fair value measurement due to the fair value of the hybrid note and embedded derivative exceeding the proceeds that the Company received from the arrangement. Therefore, the Company was required to record a loss on the derivative financial instrument. In addition, the fair value will change in future periods, based upon changes in the Company’s common stock price and changes in other assumptions and market indicators used in the valuation techniques. These future changes will be recognized in changes in fair value of derivatives on the Company’s statement of operations. At December 31, 2015 and 2014, the convertible note payable, at fair value, was recorded at $132,287 and $114,649, respectively (See Note 5). Accordingly, the company recognized loss of $28,172 and $4,506 in changes in fair value of derivative on the Company’s statement of operations at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.

In addition, the proceeds of $208,597 and $50,000 received as a result of the issuance of these convertible notes is attributable to the value of the call option embedded in the note as of December 31, 2014 and 2015, respectively, which was recorded as a debt discount and will be amortized over the term of the note under the interest method. Amortization for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 is $59,145 and $181,397, respectively.

5. Derivative Liabilities

As discussed in Note 4 under Convertible Notes, the Company issued convertible notes payable that provide for the issuance of convertible notes with variable conversion provisions. The number of shares of common stock to be issued is based on the future price of the Company’s common stock. The number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the note is indeterminate. Pursuant to ASC 815-15 Embedded Derivatives, the fair values of the variable conversion shares to be issued were recorded as derivative liabilities on the issuance date. The fair values of the Company’s derivative liabilities were estimated at the issuance date and are revalued at each subsequent reporting date, using a binomial option pricing model. The changes in fair value of derivatives for $28,172 and $4,506 on the Company’s statement of operations as of December 31, 2015 and 2014 consisted a loss attributable to market value of the convertible notes.

The following is a summary of changes in the fair market value of the derivative liability during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014:


		Derivative Liability Convertible Debts Total
Balance, December 31, 2013	$	-
Increase in derivative value due to issuances of convertible promissory notes		208,597
Decrease in derivative value due to issuances of common stocks for conversions		(98,454)
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities due to the mark to market adjustment		4,506
Balance, December 31, 2014	$	$114,649
Increase in derivative value due to issuances of convertible promissory notes		50,000
Decrease in derivative value due to issuances of common stocks for conversions		(60,534)
Change in fair market value of derivative liabilities due to the mark to market adjustment		28,172
Balance, December 31, 2015	$	132,287

6. Common shares

Convertible preferred stock issued for merger

On July 22, 2014, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Virtual Physician's Network through issuance of 10,000,000 shares of convertible preferred stock. Each share of convertible preferred stock is convertible into 20 shares of the Company’s common stock. Upon the occurrence of a mandatory conversion event, which occurs immediately following the business day on which the Corporation’s shareholders have approved an amendment to the Corporation’s Articles of Incorporation which provide for a sufficient number of authorized common stock which will permit the holders of the convertible preferred stock to convert such shares into the Company’s Common Stock, the outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock shall automatically be converted at a conversion rate of 20 shares of Common Stock for every 1 share of convertible preferred stock. As of December 31, 2014, these shares have not been issued due to administrative delay. They were valued at $1,600,000, which is 20 times of closing price of common stock price of $0.008 on the date of merger. As of December 31, 2014, these shares have not been issued due to administrative delay. The 10,000,000 shares of convertible preferred stocks were accrued in preferred stocks issuable with a fair value of $1,600,000.

Common stock issued for reverse merger

On December 11, 2012, the Company entered into a share exchange agreement (the “Agreement”) with DMH International Inc. (“DMHI”), a Nevada company. Under the terms of the Agreement, the Company issued 100% of the issued and outstanding common shares of Touch Medical Solutions, Inc. (“TMSI”) in exchange for 125,000,000 common shares, comprised of 100,000,000 common shares from the President and Director of DMHI and 25,000,000 newly issued common shares. In addition, the President and Director of DMHI returned and cancelled 100,000,000 common shares. The Agreement results in management and shareholders of TMSI to hold 78% of the issued and outstanding common shares of the Company, resulting in a reverse recapitalization transaction (See Note 1). Following the above events, there were 161,000,000 shares outstanding, including:

Shares	Held By:
125,000,000	TMSI Shareholders
36,000,000	Existing DMHI Shareholders

Common stock issued in a private placement

During January, 2014, the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to a subscriber at a price per share of $0.01 for total proceeds of $50,000.

During March, 2014, the Company granted 7,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to a subscriber at a price per share of $0.005 for total proceeds of $35,000. These shares were accrued in common stock issuable at March 31, 2014 as the shares were not issued until April 2014.27

DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

6. Common shares (continued)

During March, 2014, the Company granted 7,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to a subscriber at a price per share of $0.005 for total proceeds of $35,000. These shares were accrued in common stock issuable as the shares were not issued as of September 30, 2015.

During April, 2014, the Company issued 7,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to a subscriber at a price per share of $0.005 for total proceeds of $35,000.

During May, 2013, the Company issued 31,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to a subscriber at a price per share of $0.01 for total proceeds of $315,000.

During November, 2013, the Company issued 8,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to three subscribers at a price per share of $0.005 for total proceeds of $40,000.

Common stock issued for services

During May, 2015, the Company signed an agreement to pay the consultant for a monthly fee of $2,500 in cash and $5,000 in stock for a term of one year. The number of shares will be based on an average of the three lowest VWAP’s for the last two weeks of that month started from May 2015. During year ended December 31, 2015, the total of 10,555,556 shares were granted with a fair value of $10,556. The shares were valued using April 21, 2015 closing value of shares on date of agreement. The number shares are calculated using an average of the three lowest VWAP’s for the last two weeks of May and June 2015. On August 25, 2015, the agreement was terminated and the common stocks that have been granted were cancelled due to nonperformance.

During August, 2014, the Company issued a total of 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to two consultants for consulting services rendered. The shares were valued at $0.007 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $35,000 during the year ended December 31, 2014. The fair value of common stock issued for services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.

During September, 2014, the Company issued 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to a consultant for consulting services for a term of one year. The shares were valued at $0.006 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $60,000 during the year ended December 31, 2014. The fair value of common stock issued for services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.

DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

6. Common shares (Continued)

Common stock issued for services (Continued)

During February, 2014, the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to a consultant for consulting services for a term of one year. The shares were valued at $0.02 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $100,000 during the year ended December 31, 2014. The fair value of common stock issued for services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.

During February, 2014, the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to a consultant for consulting services for a term of one year. The shares were valued at $0.015 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $75,000 during the year ended December 31, 2014. The fair value of common stock issued for services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.

During March, 2014, the Company granted a total of 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to a consultant for consulting services for a term from six months. The 1,500,000 shares were issued, and the remaining 3,500,000 shares will be issued in connection with the agreement following the filing of a new S-8 Stock Plan. The 3,500,000 shares were accrued in common stocks issuable with a fair value of $35,000. The shares were valued at $0.01 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $50,000 during the year ended December 31, 2014. The fair value of common stock issued for services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.

~~During~~Convertible ~~April,~~preferred ~~2013, the Company issued 15,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common~~ stock to a consultant for marketing services for nine months. The shares were valued at $0.0129 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $193,500 during the year ended December 31, 2013. The fair value of common stock issued for ~~services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.~~merger

~~During~~On ~~April~~July 22, ~~2013~~2014, the Company ~~issued~~acquired 5all of the outstanding shares of Virtual Physician’s Network through issuance of 10,000,000 shares of convertible preferred stock. Each share of convertible preferred stock has the voting rights of 20 shares of the Company’s ~~restricted~~common stock. Upon the occurrence of a mandatory conversion event, which occurs immediately following the business day on which the Corporation’s shareholders have approved an amendment to the Corporation’s Articles of Incorporation which provide for a sufficient number of authorized common stock which will permit the holders of the convertible preferred stock to convert such shares into the Company’s Common Stock, the outstanding shares of convertible preferred stock shall automatically be converted at a ~~consultant~~conversion ~~for~~rate ~~investor~~of ~~relations~~20 ~~services~~shares of Common Stock for aevery ~~year~~1 share of convertible preferred stock. ~~The~~As of December 31, 2015, the 7,432,099 shares were ~~valued~~issued at the price of $0.~~0129~~16 per share, and the ~~closing~~remaining ~~price~~shares ofhave ~~the~~not ~~stock~~been onissued ~~the~~due ~~date~~to ofadministrative ~~grant~~delay. The ~~Company~~remaining ~~recorded~~2,567,901 anshares ~~equity~~of ~~compensation~~convertible ~~charge~~preferred ofstocks ~~$64,500~~were ~~during~~accrued ~~the~~in ~~year~~preferred ~~ended~~stocks ~~December~~issuable ~~31,~~with ~~2013.~~a ~~The~~ fair value of ~~common~~$410,864. ~~stock~~Each ~~issued~~share ~~for~~of ~~services~~convertible ~~was~~preferred ~~fully~~stock ~~expensed~~was onvalued ~~the~~at ~~date~~20 times of ~~grant~~closing ~~due~~price toof nocommon ~~clawback~~stock ~~provision~~price inof $0.008 on the ~~agreement~~date of merger.

During June, 2013, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to a consultant for investor relations services for six months. The shares were valued at $0.0065 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $6,500 during the year ended December 31, 2013. The fair value of common stock issued for services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.28

During July, 2013, the Company issued a total of 23,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to four consultants for investor relations and consulting services for a term from six months to one year. The shares were valued at $0.0047 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $108,100 during the year ended December 31, 2013. The fair value of common stock issued for services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.

During October, 2013, the Company issued a total of 19,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to officers and employees for services. The shares were valued at $0.0091 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $172,900 during the year ended December 31, 2013. The fair value of common stock issued for services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.

During October, 2013, the Company issued a total of 4,500,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to six consultants for consulting services that have been rendered. The shares were valued at $0.0091 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $40,950 during the year ended December 31, 2013. The fair value of common stock issued for services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.

During November, 2013, the Company issued a total of 3,500,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to six consultants for investor relations and consulting services for a term from six months to one year. The shares were valued in the range from $0.012 to $0.024 per share, the closing price of the stock on the date of grant. The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $68,200 during the year ended December 31, 2013. The fair value of common stock issued for services was fully expensed on the date of grant due to no clawback provision in the agreement.

DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

6. Common shares (~~Continued~~continued)

Common Stock Issued for Debt Conversions

During September through December, 2014, following the convertible note agreement in the amount of $40,000 on March 3, 2014, the debt holder made the following conversions of a total of 22,106,486 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying $40,000 of the note with a fair value of $89,441, included in the fair value of $89,441 was settlement of derivative liability of $49,441. The Company recorded a loss of $2,324 for additional shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement (See Note 4).

Date	Number of shares converted		Fair Value of Debt Converted
9/15/2014	6,708,698	$	$30,634
9/22/2014	6,719,753	$	$29,523
10/7/2014	2,904,864	$	$15,155
12/4/2014	5,773,171	$	$14,129

During October through December, 2014, following the convertible note agreement in the amount of $50,000 on March 31, 2014, the debt holder made the following conversions of a total of 19,893,000 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying $32,438 of the note with a fair value of $81,451, included in the fair value of $81,451 was settlement of derivative liability of $49,013. The Company recorded a gain of $12,550 for less shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the debt holder made the following two conversions of a total of 19,962,450 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying the remaining $17,562 of the note in full with a fair value of $46,450, included in the fair value of debt balance of $46,450 was settlement of derivative liability of $26,488.The Company recorded a gain of $10,468 for less shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement (See Note 4).

Date	Number of shares converted		Fair Value of Debt Converted
10/20/2014	1,724,137	$	$13,334
10/30/2014	1,785,714	$	$13,596
11/10/2014	1,851,851	$	$12,573
12/15/2014	14,531,298	$	$41,948
02/5/2015	14,400,000		$33,578
03/27/2015	5,562,450		$12,872

On January 28, 2015, following the convertible note agreement in the amount of $250,000 on July 25, 2014, the note was satisfied in full with 25,000,000 shares of common stocks per settlement agreement with a fair value of $269,471, included in the fair value of debt balance of $269,471 was accrued interest of $11,194 and settlement of derivative liability of $8,277. The Company recorded a loss of $11,105 for more shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement (See Note 4).

On April 1, 2015, the debt holder made a conversion of a total of 19,000,000 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying $19,000 of the note with a fair value of $25,769, included in the fair value of debt balance of $25,769 was settlement of derivative liability of $25,769.The Company recorded a gain of $31,091 for less shares issued during the conversion than what was called for in the original agreement (See Note 4).

DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

7. Merger

On July 22, 2014, we completed the Merger Agreement with Virtual Physician'’s Network. Pursuant to the agreement, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of Virtual Physician'’s Network through issuance of 10,000,000 shares of the Company’s convertible preferred stock. Each of preferred stock ishas ~~convertible~~the ~~into~~voting rights of 20 shares of our common stock. Virtual Physician'’s Network was merged into the Company and became the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary. As of December 31, 2014, these shares have not been issued due to administrative delay. The 10,000,000 shares of convertible preferred stocks were accrued in preferred stocks issuable with a fair value of $1,600,000. Each share of convertible preferred stock was valued at 20 times of closing price of common stock price of $0.008 on the date of merger.

This acquisition was accounted for as a business combination under the purchase method of accounting, given that substantially all of the Company’s assets and ongoing operations were acquired. The purchase resulted in $1,610,353 of goodwill. According to the purchase method of accounting, the Company recognized the identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed as follows:


		July 22, 2014
Consideration:
Preferred convertible stock issued	$	1,600,000
Cash paid prior to closing		20,000
Total consideration given		1,620,000

Fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed:
Cash	$	11,947
Due to a related party		(2,300)
Total fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed		9,647

Consideration paid in excess of fair value (Goodwill)(1)		1,610,353
Impairment of goodwill at 12/31/2014		(1,610,353)
Fair value of goodwill at 12/31/2014		-

(1) The consideration paid in excess of the net fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed has been recognized as goodwill.

33Management believes the product line of Virtual Physician’s Network acquired will enable the Company to enhance their business model and strengthen its future cash flows to fund operations and take advantage of additional growth opportunities. The Company’s evaluation of goodwill completed during the year end resulted in an impairment loss of $1,610,353.

DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

7. Merger (Continued)

Management believes the product line of Virtual Physician's Network acquired will enable the Company to enhance their business model and strengthen its future cash flows to fund operations and take advantage of additional growth opportunities. The Company's evaluation of goodwill completed during the year end resulted in an impairment loss of $1,610,353.

8. Income Taxes

The Company has $12,~~945~~181,~~966~~363 of net operating losses ($1,~~382~~945,~~650~~966 in ~~2013~~2014) carried forward to offset taxable income in future years which expire commencing in fiscal ~~2034~~2035. The income tax benefit differs from the amount computed by applying the US federal income tax rate of 34% to net loss before income taxes. As at December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014, the Company had no uncertain tax positions.

	December 31, 2014 $	December 31, 2013 $
	December 31, 2015 $	December 31, 2014 $
Net loss carry forward	(12,~~945~~181,~~966~~363)	(1,~~382~~945,~~650~~966)
Statutory rate	34%	34%
Computed expected tax recovery	~~661~~741,~~628~~663	~~470~~661,~~101~~628
Valuation allowance	(~~661~~741,~~628~~663)	(~~470~~661,~~101~~628)
Income tax provision	–	–

9. Subsequent Events

OnIn ~~January~~February 282016, ~~2015,~~ the Company issued a ~~total~~promissory note to a non-related party in the amount of 25$15,000 bearing interest at 10% annually. The note is due in one year from the execution and funding of the note. In the event of default, the noteholder will receive 500,000 shares of the ~~company~~Company’s restricted common stock toon ~~settle~~ the ~~convertible~~date ~~notes~~that ofis ~~$250,000~~10 ~~originated~~business ondays ~~July~~after ~~25,~~the ~~2014~~maturity ~~(See Note 4)~~date.

~~During~~On ~~February through~~ March 8, ~~2014~~2016, following the convertible note agreement in the amount of $50,000 on ~~March~~May 315, 2014, the debt holder made the conversions of a total of 1920,~~962~~000,~~450~~000 shares of the company’s restricted stock satisfying ~~the remaining amount of the~~ $1920,~~961~~000 of the note ~~in full~~.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

Section 1.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures:

As of December 31, ~~2014~~2015, we carried out an evaluation under the supervision and the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, ~~2014~~2015, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”). Based on that evaluation, our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that, because of the material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting discussed in Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting below, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective, at a reasonable assurance level, as of December 31, ~~2014~~2015. In light of this, we performed additional post-closing procedures and analyses in order to prepare the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report. As a result of these procedures, we believe our Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report present fairly, in all material respects, our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. A control system cannot provide absolute assurance, however, that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, with the company have been detected.

Section 2.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During its evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2014~~2015, our management concluded that its material weaknesses in its internal controls over financial reporting include matters pertaining to the need to enhance the supervision, monitoring and reviewing of financial statement preparation processes.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is the process designed by and under the supervision of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, or the persons performing similar functions, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external reporting in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Management has evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control over Financial Reporting - Guidance for Smaller Public Companies. Under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer/Chief Financial Officer, our management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and concluded that it is ineffective because of the material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting described above.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2014~~2015, the Company determined that there were control deficiencies that constituted material weaknesses, as described below.

1. We do not have an Audit Committee – While not being legally obligated to have an audit committee, it is the management’s view that such a committee, including a financial expert member, is an utmost important entity level control over the Company’s financial statement. Currently the Board of Directors acts in the capacity of the Audit Committee, and does not include a member that is considered to be independent of management to provide the necessary oversight over management’s activities. 2. We did not maintain appropriate cash controls – As of December 31, 2014, the Company has not maintained sufficient internal controls over financial reporting for the cash process, including failure to segregate cash handling and accounting functions, and did not require dual signature on the Company’s bank accounts. Alternatively, the effects of poor cash controls were mitigated by the fact that the Company had limited transactions in their bank accounts. 3. We did not implement appropriate information technology controls – As at December 31, 2014, the Company retains copies of all financial data and material agreements; however there is no formal procedure or evidence of normal backup of the Company’s data or off-site storage of the data in the event of theft, misplacement, or loss due to unmitigated factors.)

35We do not have an Audit Committee – While not being legally obligated to have an audit committee, it is the management’s view that such a committee, including a financial expert member, is an utmost important entity level control over the Company’s financial statement. Currently the Board of Directors acts in the capacity of the Audit Committee, and does not include a member that is considered to be independent of management to provide the necessary oversight over management’s activities.

We did not maintain appropriate cash controls – As of December 31, 2015, the Company has not maintained sufficient internal controls over financial reporting for the cash process, including failure to segregate cash handling and accounting functions, and did not require dual signature on the Company’s bank accounts. Alternatively, the effects of poor cash controls were mitigated by the fact that the Company had limited transactions in their bank accounts.

We did not implement appropriate information technology controls – As at December 31, 2015, the Company retains copies of all financial data and material agreements; however there is no formal procedure or evidence of normal backup of the Company’s data or off-site storage of the data in the event of theft, misplacement, or loss due to unmitigated factors.

Accordingly, the Company concluded that these control deficiencies resulted in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the company’s internal controls.

As a result of the material weaknesses described above, management has concluded that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, ~~2014~~2015 based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Rule 13a-15 or 15d-15 under the Exchange Act that occurred during the year ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 that have materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information

None

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Directors and Executive Officers

Our Board of Directors elects our executive officers annually. Directors are elected to hold office until the next annual meeting. A majority vote of the directors who are in office is required to fill vacancies of our Board of Directors not caused by removal. Each director, including a Director elected to fill a vacancy, will hold office until the expiration of the term for which the Director was elected and until a successor has been elected. Our directors and executive officers are as follows:

Listed below are our executive officers and directors as of December 31, ~~2014~~2015:

Name	Age	Position with the Company	Director Since
George England	51	President, Chief Executive Officer and Director	July 22, 2014 - present
Rik J. Deitsch	47	Chairman, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer	December 11, 2012 - present
Jason Barry	43	Director, Former: Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer	December 11, 2012 - present

George England

Mr. England has been a Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since July 22, 2014. George England has over 26 years of experience as a healthcare entrepreneur and executive. He has served as the President and COO of Virtual Physician’s Network, Inc. since 2011. From 2009 until 2011, Mr. England served as Sales Director Southeast for Nuvasive, a medical device company then Operations Manager of Integrity Medical, Nuvasive'’s largest distributor. From 2007 to 2009, Mr. England served as V.P. of Sales for Surgical Outcome Support, a web-based healthcare clinical outcomes solution. In 2002 Mr. England founded and was President of United Surgical Consultants, a company specializing in the business development of medical practices and ancillary service models. Previously, Mr. England has worked with industry leaders such as Synthes, K2M and Osteotech. Mr. England has also consulted on the design of medical devices and medical instruments with several national healthcare companies and has an issued patent (US 8,728,163) on an artificial disc replacement device. Mr. England has also authored a multi-center, randomized clinical trial protocol approved by NEIRB (New England Internal Review Board) to study the efficacy and effectiveness of a dietary supplement for the spine, which included 100 patients and yielded positive results. In 1985, Mr. England graduated with BA degree from High Point University in North Carolina.

Rik J. Deitsch – Chairman of the Board, Chief Financial Officer Secretary and Treasurer

Mr. Deitsch founded Touch Medical Solutions in 2010 and has been the Chairman of the Board since December 31, 2012. Mr. Deitsch served as the CEO of the Company from December 31, 2012 - July 22, 2014. Since January 1, 2015, Mr. Deitsch has served as the CFO, Secretary and Treasurer of the Company. From November 2002 through the present, Mr. Deitsch has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Nutra Pharma Corporation, a public biotechnology company with therapies for the treatment of Multiple Sclerosis, HIV and pain. From February 1998 through November 2002, Mr. Deitsch served as the President of NDA Consulting Inc., a biotechnology research group that provided consulting services to the pharmaceutical industry. NDA Consulting specialized in the research of peptides derived from Cone Snail venom, Cobra venom and Gila Monster venom. Mr. Deitsch holds both a B.S. in Chemistry and an M.S. in Biochemistry from Florida Atlantic University and has conducted clinical and laboratory research in

3632

biotechnology research group that provided consulting services to the pharmaceutical industry. NDA Consulting specialized in the research of peptides derived from Cone Snail venom, Cobra venom and Gila Monster venom. Mr. Deitsch holds both a B.S. in Chemistry and an M.S. in Biochemistry from Florida Atlantic University and has conducted clinical and laboratory research in collaboration with scientists at Duke University Medical Center and the Cleveland Clinic. He is the author of two books: Are you Agewise: A Guide to Healthy Aging and Invisible Killers; the Truth About Environmental Genocide. Mr. Deitsch is an adjunct professor and teaches several courses for Florida Atlantic University’s College of Business and Continuing Education Department.

Jason Barry – Director and Former Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, and Treasurer

M. Barry joined the Company in December 2012. Since joining Touch Medical Solutions in August 2010, Jason Barry has helped grow TMSI from a software vision to an FDA approved medical device. He is responsible for all aspects of development, testing, sales, and marketing activities. Under Jason's leadership Touch Medical has released 2 major software packages for sale (TouchPACS and TouchRIS) and is poised to launch TouchEHR in 2013. From June 2008- August 2010, Jason was founder and CEO at Big Picture Project Management where he provided services as a consultant and project manager for AT&T wireless. At AT&T Jason worked with top technology partners like Apple, HTC, and Motorola, as well as top retail clients like Amazon, Best Buy, and Walmart. Prior to founding Big Picture, Jason was a product specialist at King & Spalding LLP (July 1997- June 2008), a top 50 law firm. At King & Spalding Jason participated in the creation of the first Intranet and extranet products leveraging web based programs and document storage to achieve firm goals.

Corporate Governance

a. Committees

(i) Audit Committee

The Company does not have an audit committee or an audit committee financial expert (as defined in Item 407 of Regulation S-K) serving on its Board of Directors. All current members of the Board of Directors lack sufficient financial expertise for overseeing financial reporting responsibilities. The Company has not yet employed an audit committee financial expert on its Board due to the inability to attract such a person.

The Company intends to establish an audit committee of the board of directors, which will consist of independent directors. The audit committee’s duties will be to recommend to the Company’s board of directors the engagement of an independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Company’s financial statements and to review the Company’s accounting and auditing principles. The audit committee will review the scope, timing and fees for the annual audit and the results of audit examinations performed by the internal auditors and independent registered public accounting firm, including their recommendations to improve the system of accounting and internal controls. The audit committee will at all times be composed exclusively of directors who are, in the opinion of the Company’s board of directors, free from any relationship which would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment as a committee member and who possess an understanding of financial statements and generally accepted accounting principles.

(ii) Compensation Committee

We currently do not have a compensation committee of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors as a whole determines executive compensation.

(iii) Nominating Committee

We do not have a Nominating Committee or similar committee performing similar functions nor a written Nominating Committee Charter. Our Board of Directors as a whole decides such matters, including those that would be performed by a standing nominating committee. We have not yet adopted a nominating committee because we have not sufficiently developed revenue-generating operations. We do not currently have any specific or minimum criteria for the election of nominees to our Board of Directors nor do we have any process or procedure for evaluating such nominees.

b. Shareholder Communications

Our Board of Directors does not have any defined policy or procedure requirements for our stockholders to send communications to our Board of Directors, including submission of recommendations for nominating directors. We have not yet adopted a process for our security holders to communicate with our Board of Directors because we have not sufficiently developed our operations and corporate governance structure. We have a number at (888)218-5713 available on our website for our shareholders to contact us as well as a dedicated email address at investor.relations@dmhintl.com.

c. Board of Director Meetings

We had 42 Board of Directors meeting during our ~~2014~~2015 Fiscal Year. Our corporate actions that were subject to Board approval were accomplished by Board resolutions. We request that all of our Directors attend our Board of Director meetings; however, we have no formal policy regarding their attendance.

d. Annual Shareholder Meetings

We held no annual shareholders meeting during ~~2014~~2015.

We request that all of our Directors attend our Annual Shareholder Meetings; however, we have no formal policy regarding their attendance.

e. Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Ethics (the “Code”) that applies to our directors, officers and employees, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. A written copy of the Code is available on written request to the Company and is filed with the SEC on October 12, 2010 as part of the Company’s S-1 that is incorporated by reference hereto as Exhibit 14.01.

Item 11.Executive Compensation

The following table summarizes compensation information for the last two fiscal years for (i) our Chief Executive Officer and (ii) the four most highly compensated executive officers other than the Chief Executive Officer who were serving as our executive officers at the end of the fiscal year (collectively, the "“Named Executive Officers"”).

The following executive compensation disclosure reflects all compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to the executive officers below, for the fiscal years ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014:

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Name and principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non- Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
George England(1)	~~2014~~2015	~~$121~~109,~~500~~900	—	—181,337		—	—	—	~~$121~~291,~~500~~237
Chief Executive Officer
President
and Director
Rik Deitsch(2)	~~2014~~2015	—	—		—	—	—	—	—
Chairman of the Board
Chief Financial Officer
Treasurer and Secretary
Former CEO & President
Jason Barry(3)	2014	$60,000	—		—	—	—	—	$60,000
Name and principal Position	Year	Salary ($)	Bonus ($)	Stock Awards ($)	Option Awards ($)	Non- Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)	Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)	All Other Compensation ($)	Total ($)
Director
George England(1)	2014	121,500	—	—		—	—	—	121,500
Rik Deitsch(2)	2013	—	—	$91,000	—	—	—	—	$91,000
Chief Executive Officer
Chief Executive Officer
President
President and Chairman of the Board
and Director
Jason Barry(3)	2013	$60,000	—	$72,800	—	—	—	—	$132,800
Rik Deitsch(2)	2014	—	—		—	—	—	—	—
Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Director
Chairman of the Board
Chief Financial Officer
Treasurer and Secretary
Former CEO & President

(1) ~~On July 22, 2014 George England agreed to act as the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer and Director.~~

~~(2)~~ On ~~December~~July 1122, ~~2012~~2014 ~~Rik~~George ~~Deitsch~~England agreed to act as the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer and ~~Chairman~~Director. ~~On July 22, 2014 Mr. Deitsch stepped down as CEO. On January 1, 2015 Mr. Deitsch agreed to act as the Company's CFO, Treasurer and Secretary.~~

(32) On December 11, 2012 Jason Barry agreed to act as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director. On January 1, 2015 Mr. Barry stepped down as the Company's CFO, Treasurer and Secretary.

38On December 11, 2012 Rik Deitsch agreed to act as the Company’s President, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman. On July 22, 2014 Mr. Deitsch stepped down as CEO. On January 1, 2015 Mr. Deitsch agreed to act as the Company’s CFO, Treasurer and Secretary.

Director Compensation

There are no standard arrangements to which directors are compensated for services provided to us. Should we obtain adequate funding or sufficient revenues to justify standard arrangements for director compensation, we will consider whether to adopt such a compensation plan.

Stock Option Grants in Last Fiscal Year

We did not grant incentive and non-qualified stock options in ~~2014~~2015 to any executive officer or director.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following tables sets forth, as of December 31, ~~2014~~2015, certain information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock by each stockholder known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock and by each of our current directors and executive officers. Each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares of common stock, except as otherwise indicated. Information relating to beneficial ownership of common stock by our principal stockholders and management is based upon information furnished by each person using "“beneficial ownership"” concepts under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Under these rules, a person is deemed to be a beneficial owner of a security if that person has or shares voting power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of the security, or investment power, which includes the power to vote or direct the voting of the security. The person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any security of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days.

Under the Securities and Exchange Commission rules, more than one person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of the same securities, and a person may be deemed to be a beneficial owner of securities as to which he or she may not have any pecuniary beneficial interest. We are unaware of any contract or arrangement that could result in a change in control of our company.

The following table assumes based on our stock records, that there are ~~415~~435,961,936 shares issued and outstanding as of ~~April~~May 135, ~~2014~~2016.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND BENEFICIAL OWNERS

Name and Address of Director or Executive Officer	Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned	Percent of Common Stock Outstanding
George England Chief Executive Officer, President 12502 W. Atlantic Blvd Coral Springs, Florida 33071	-	0%
George England Chief Executive Officer, President 12538 W. Atlantic Blvd Coral Springs, Florida 33071	-	0%
Rik J. Deitsch Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, Chairman 12502 W. Atlantic Blvd Coral Springs, Florida 33071	103,500,000	25%
Rik J. Deitsch Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, Chairman 12538 W. Atlantic Blvd Coral Springs, Florida 33071	103,500,000	25%
Jason Barry Director 12502 W. Atlantic Blvd Coral Springs, Florida 33071	39,250,000	9%
Jason Barry Director 12538 W. Atlantic Blvd Coral Springs, Florida 33071	39,250,000	9%
All executive officers and directors as a group (2) persons	142,750,000	34%

None of the directors or executive officers of the Company, nor any person who owned of record or was known to own beneficially more than 5% of the Company’s outstanding shares of its Common Stock, nor any associate or affiliate of such persons or companies, has any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction that has occurred during the past fiscal year, or in any proposed transaction, which has materially affected or will affect the Company.

With regard to any future related party transaction, we plan to fully disclose any and all related party transactions in the following manner:

Disclosing such transactions in reports where required;

Disclosing in any and all filings with the SEC, where required;

Obtaining disinterested directors consent; and

Obtaining shareholder consent where required.

Director Independence

Our common stock is quoted on the OTC-Markets; that trading medium does not have director independence requirements. Under Item 407(a) of Regulation S-K, we have adopted the definition of independence used by the American Stock Exchange, which may be found in the American Stock Exchange Company guide at (s) 121(A) (2) (2007). This definition states that our Board of Directors must affirmatively determine whether any of our directors have a relationship that would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out their responsibilities of a director. Based on this definitional standard, our Board of Directors has determined that none of our Directors are independent.

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees billed to us for fiscal years ended December 31, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~2013~~2014 by our accountants, M&K CPAS, PLLC. were approximately $1119,~~500~~250 and $811,500 for professional services rendered for the audit of our annual consolidated financial statements and reviews of our interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports and other services related to statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Tax Fees

No such fees were paid in ~~2014~~2015 or ~~2013~~2014.

All Other Fees

No such fees were paid in ~~2014~~2015 or ~~2013~~2014.

PART IV

ITEM 15: EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, SCHEDULES

The following documents were filed as part of this report or incorporated by reference to previous filings if so indicated.

Number	Description
2.1	Share Exchange Agreement Dated December 12, 2012 by and between Touch Medical Solutions, Inc. and DMH Corporation (Incorporated by reference to the Company’s 8-K filed on December 14, 2012.)
3.1	Articles of Incorporation (1)
3.2	Bylaws (1)
14.1	Code of Ethics (1)
31.1	Certification of Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certificate of Chief Executive Officer
31.2	Certification of Rule 13a-14(a)/15(d)-14(a) Certificate of Chief Financial Officer
32.1	Section 9.06: Certification of Chief Executive Officer
32.2	Section 9.06: Certification of Chief Financial Officer
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

101.INS	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

(1) Incorporated by reference to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 dated October 12, 2010

4036

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	DMH International, Inc.


	/s/ George England
	George England
	Director, President, Chief Executive Officer

Dated: ~~April~~May 135, ~~2014~~2016

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated.

Signature	Title	Date
/s/ George England	Director, President, Chief Executive Officer
George England		~~April~~May 135, ~~2014~~2016
/s/ Rik J. Deitsch	Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer, Chairman, Principal Accounting Officer	~~April~~May 135, ~~2014~~2016
Rik J. Deitsch

4137

Filing Compare · DMH INTERNATIONAL, INC.