UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

☒	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2014

OR

☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

	For the transition period from __________ to __________

~~For~~Commission ~~the~~File ~~quarterly~~Number ~~period ended: December 31, 2013~~000-5444

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 000-54444

RED MOUNTAIN RESOURCES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Texas	27-1739487
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
2515 McKinney Avenue, Suite 900 Dallas, TX	75201
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

2515 McKinney Avenue, Suite 900 Dallas, TX	75201
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(214) 871-0400

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x☒ No ¨☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant is required to submit and post such files). Yes x☒ No ¨☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨☐ Accelerated filer x☒ Non-accelerated filer ¨☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company ¨☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨☐ No x ☒

As of ~~February~~November 614, 2014, the registrant had 1314,~~401~~857,~~311~~ 488 shares of common stock outstanding.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements	1
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2013 and May 31, 2013 (unaudited)	1
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014	1
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for Each of the Three and Six Months Ended December 31, 2013 and November 30, 2012 (unaudited)	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for Each of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Six Months Ended December 31, 2013 and November 30, 2012 (unaudited)	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for Each of the Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Six Months Ended December 31, 2013 (unaudited)	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2014	4
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	5
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1916
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	2924
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	3025
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	3226
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	3226
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	3227
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	3227
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	3227
Item 5.	Other Information	3327
Item 6.	Exhibits	3428

Explanatory Note

Red Mountain Resources, Inc. effected a reverse stock split of its outstanding common stock at a ratio of one-for-ten (1:10) on January 31, 2014. All share and per share amounts and calculations in this Quarterly Report and the accompanying consolidated condensed financial statements have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the effects of the reverse stock split.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.

Financial Statements

Red Mountain Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(unaudited)

(in thousands)

	December 31, 2013			May 31, 2013
	September 30,			June 30,
	(unaudited)
	2014			2014
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,~~866~~000		$	1,~~112~~682
Accounts receivable – oil and natural gas sales		2,372			3,522
Accounts receivable - oil and natural gas sales		2,772			3,186
Accounts receivable – joint interest		~~1,002~~764			21,~~604~~645
Debt issuance costs		230			230
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		551			527
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		685			420
Commodities derivative asset – current		189			37
Commodities derivative asset – current		—			190
Deferred tax asset – current		277			368
Deferred tax asset – current		458			299
Total current assets		5,553			7,445
Total current assets		6,613			8,377
Long-Term Investments:
Debentures – held to maturity		4,820			4,~~279~~820
Oil and Natural Gas Properties, Successful Efforts Method:
Proved properties		7185,~~498~~146			6382,~~891~~362
Unproved properties		19,~~796~~043			19,~~539~~109
Other property and equipment		1,~~191~~139			1,~~026~~196
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion and impairment		(14,230	)		(9,324	)
Less accumulated depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment		(21,977	)		(19,497	)
Oil and natural gas properties, net		7883,~~255~~351			7583,~~132~~170
Other Assets:
Commodities derivative asset, net of current portion		—			75
Restricted cash, long-term		493			493
Restricted cash, long-term		465			452
Debt issuance costs, net of current portion		975			1,101
Debt issuance costs, net of current portion		1,681			450
Security deposit and other assets		181			197
Security deposit and other assets		71			465
Total Assets	$	95,373		$	97,226
Total Assets	$	91,905		$	89,230
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable	$	64,~~634~~467		$	93,~~354~~536
Revenues payable		1,~~147~~154			~~774~~1,673
Preferred dividend payable		249			—
Accrued expenses		2,605			2,035
Accrued expenses		3,042			1,137
Commodities derivative liability		—			121
Commodities derivative liability		54			34
Dividend payable		175			179
Convertible notes payable, net of discount of $0 and $442, respectively		—			3,308
Taxes payable		3			—
Notes payable – current		—			500
Asset retirement obligation – current		178			214
Asset retirement obligation – current		242			228
Environmental remediation liability – current		2,057			2,067
Environmental remediation liability – current		1,400			1,400
Line of credit – current		26,800			—
Total current liabilities		1237,~~768~~439			169,~~735~~825
Long-Term Liabilities:
Line of credit, net of current portion		14,800			19,800
Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock, net of discount of $1,464 and $1,561		4,898			4,801
Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock, net of discount of $3,300 and $0, respectively		8,631			—
Line of credit, net of current portion		—			26,800
Environmental remediation liability, net of current portion		688			688
Deferred tax liability – long-term		330			409
Deferred tax liability – long-term		458			299
Asset retirement obligation, net of current portion		5,570			5,531
Asset retirement obligation, net of current portion		4,969			4,751
Total long-term liabilities		10,798			37,541
Total long-term liabilities		29,546			25,538
Total Liabilities		48,237			47,366
Total Liabilities		42,314			42,273
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 10)
Stockholders’ Equity:
Common stock, $0.00001 par value; 50,000 shares authorized; 13,422 shares issued and 13,401 outstanding as of December 31, 2013; 12,692 shares issued and 12,596 shares outstanding as of May 31, 2013		1			1
Common stock, $0.00001 par value; 50,000 shares authorized; 14,857 shares issued and 14,790 shares outstanding as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014		1			1
Noncontrolling interest		56,~~806~~244			56,~~603~~076
Additional paid-in capital		7278,~~078~~105			6578,~~536~~105
Accumulated deficit		(2837,~~294~~214	)		(2434,~~183~~322	)
Total stockholders’ equity		4947,~~591~~136			4649,~~957~~860
Total Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity	$	9195,~~905~~373		$	8997,~~230~~226

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Red Mountain Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

	Three Months Ended,						Six Months Ended,
	Three Months Ended September 30,
	December 31, 2013			November 30, 2012			December 31, 2013			November 30, 2012
	2014			2013
Revenue:
Oil and natural gas sales	$	45,~~467~~272		$	15,~~108~~774		$	~~10,241~~		$	~~2,454~~
Operating Expenses:
Exploration expense		~~327~~250			12101			~~428~~			31
Production taxes		573			19			1,178			103
Dry hole expense		533			—
Lease operating expenses		707			199			1,455			565
Production taxes		419			606
Natural gas transportation and marketing expenses		37			35			74			59
Lease operating expenses		1,156			747
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment		2,162			591			4,252			1,998
Natural gas transportation and marketing expenses		98			38
Accretion of discount on asset retirement obligation		68			15			135			30
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment		2,409			2,091
General and administrative expense		1,915			1,446			3,859			4,099
Accretion of discount on asset retirement obligation		34			67
Total operating expenses		5,789			2,317			11,381			6,885
General and administrative expense		2,689			1,942
Income (Loss) from Operations		(1,322	)		(1,209	)		(1,140	)		(4,431	)
Total operating expenses		7,588			5,592
Other Income (Expense):
Income (Loss) from Operations		(2,316	)		182
Change in fair value of derivative liability		—			92			—			92
Other Income (Expense):
Unrealized gain on investment in Cross Border Resources, Inc. warrants		—			(922	)		—			(692	)
Interest expense		(665	)		(927	)
Equity in earnings of Cross Border Resources, Inc.		—			(443	)		—			(431	)
Gain (loss) on commodity derivatives		269			(384	)
Interest expense		(887	)		(756	)		(1,815	)		(1,437	)
Total Other Expense		(396	)		(1,311	)
Unrealized loss on debentures		—			—			—			(48	)
Loss Before Income Taxes		(2,712	)		(1,129	)
Unrealized gain (loss) on commodity derivatives		64			—			(231	)		—
Income tax provision		(12	)		—
Realized gain (loss) on commodity derivatives		37			—			(51	)		—
Net loss		(2,724	)		(1,129	)
Total Other Expense		(786	)		(2,029	)		(2,097	)		(2,516	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest		168			146
Loss Before Income Taxes		(2,108	)		(3,238	)		(3,237	)		(6,947	)
Net loss attributable to Red Mountain Resources, Inc.	$	(2,892	)	$	(1,275	)
Income tax provision		—			—			—			—
Basic and diluted net loss per common share	$	(0.19	)	$	(0.10	)
Net loss		(2,108	)		(3,238	)		(3,237	)		(6,947	)
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		14,857			12,922
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interest		97			—			243			—
Net loss attributable to Red Mountain Resources, Inc.	$	(2,205	)	$	(3,238	)	$	(3,480	)	$	(6,947	)
Basic and diluted net loss per common share	$	(0.16	)	$	(0.36	)	$	(0.26	)	$	(0.78	)
Basic and diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		13,372			9,053			13,147			8,904

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Red Mountain Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)

	Six Months Ended,
	Three Months Ended September 30,
	December 31,			November 30,
	2014			2013
	2013			2012
Cash Flow From Operating Activities:
Net loss	$	(32,~~237~~724	)	$	(61,~~947~~129	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment		4,252			1,998
Deferred income tax expense		12			—
Equity in earnings of Cross Border Resources, Inc.		—			431
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment		2,409			2,091
Amortization of debt issuance costs		~~894~~223			~~895~~510
Accretion of discount on asset retirement obligation		~~135~~34			3067
Dividend accrued for mandatorily redeemable preferred stock		~~249~~(4	)		—149
Unrealized gain on investment in Cross Border Resources, Inc. warrants		—			692
Change in commodity derivatives		(273	)		382
Change in fair value of commodity derivatives		—			—
Unrealized gain on derivative liability		318			(92)
Loss on debentures		—			48
Change in working capital:
Accounts receivable - oil and natural gas sales		2,301			297
Accounts receivable – oil and natural gas sales		414			883
Accounts receivable - other		664			(462	)
Accounts receivable – other		881			1,254
Prepaid expenses and other assets		~~434~~(6	)		~~156~~687
Accounts payable		~~(2,674~~411	)		2(4,~~778~~733	)
Restricted cash		(13)			25
Accrued expenses		561			(543	)
Accrued expenses		1,629			(236	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		1,938			(382	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		4,952			(387	)
Cash Flow From Investing Activities:
Additions to oil and natural gas properties		(72,~~076~~561	)		(~~408~~1,494	)
Additions to other property and equipment		(~~139~~23	)		(5571	)
Settlement of asset retirement obligations		—(36	)		~~(54~~—	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(72,~~215~~620	)		(~~517~~1,565	)
Cash Flow From Financing Activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs		~~3,605~~—			—3,605
Proceeds from issuance of preferred stock, net of issuance costs		~~7,068~~—			—7,095
Exercise of warrants		—			150
Payments on line of credit		—			(5,000	)
Net borrowings under line of credit		—			(231)
Payments on notes payable		—			(500	)
Proceeds from notes payable		—			1,400
Net cash provided by financing activities		—			5,200
Payments on line of credit		(5,000	)		—
Net change in cash and equivalents		(682	)		3,253
Payments on notes payable		(2,000	)		(201	)
Cash at beginning of period		1,682			456
Net cash provided by financing activities		3,673			1,118
Cash at end of period	$	1,000		$	3,709
Net change in cash and equivalents		1,410			214
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information:
Cash at beginning of period		456			168
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	446		$	536
Cash at end of period	$	1,866		$	382
Non-Cash Transactions:
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Change in asset retirement obligation estimate	$	5		$	22
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	1,220		$	327
Issuance of warrants with preferred stock	$	—		$	2,395
Non-Cash Transactions
Change in asset retirement obligation estimate	$	57		$	21
Issuance of shares for investment in Cross Border Resources, Inc.	$	—		$	4,667
Convertible notes payable derivative liability	$	—		$	300
Oil and gas properties included in accounts payable	$	—		$	—
Issuance of shares for debentures	$	541		$	879
Issuance of shares for equipment	$	—		$	14
Issuance of shares for debt issuance costs	$	—		$	161
Issuance of warrants with preferred stock	$	2,395		$	49

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Red Mountain Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)

								Retained
	Common Stock
						Additional		Earnings			Share
	Shares		Amount		Additional Paid-in Capital		Accumulated Deficit			Noncontrolling Interest			Total
		Common Stock				Paid-in		(Accumulated			Subscription			Noncontrolling
Balance at June 30, 2014		14,857	$	1.487	$	78,105	$	(34,322	)	$	6,076		$	49,860
		Shares		Amount		Capital		Deficit)			Receivable			Interest			Total
Net income (loss)		—		—		—		(2,892	)		168			(2,724	)
Balance at May 31, 2012		8,693	$	0.869	$	30,548	$	(10,079	)	$	(150	)	$	—		$	20,320
Balance at September 30, 2014		14,857	$	1.487	$	78,105	$	(37,214	)	$	6,244		$	47,136
Issuance of shares in private placement, net of offering costs of $1,351		1,160		0.116		7,290		—			(100	)		—			7,190
Issuance of shares for investment in Cross Border Resources, Inc.		1,573		0.157		15,236		—			—			—			15,236
Adjustment for consolidation of Cross Border Resources, Inc.		—		—		—		(1,902	)		—			6,359			4,457
Acquisition of additional minority interest in Cross Border Resources, Inc.		117		0.012		1,438		—			—			(1,438	)		—
Issuance of shares for investment in Cross Border Resources, Inc. subordinated debt		194		0.019		1,744		—			—			—			1,744
Issuance of shares to settle Cross Border Resources, Inc. bankruptcy claims		75		0.007		634		—			—			—			634
Issuance of warrants for investment in warrants of Cross Border Resources, Inc.		—		—		37		—			—			—			37
Issuance of shares for acquisition of oil and gas properties		238		0.024		2,232		—			—			—			2,232
Issuance of shares for equipment		1		—		14		—			—			—			14
Issuance of shares for stock issuance liability		8		0.001		68		—			—			—			68
Issuance of shares for debentures		570		0.057		4,782		—			—			—			4,782
Issuance of shares for debt issuance costs		12		0.001		161		—			—			—			161
Issuance of warrants for debt issuance costs		—		—		133		—			—			—			133
Issuance of shares for services		26		0.003		229		—			—			—			229
Issuance of shares to brokers		25		0.003		212		—			—			—			212
Issuance of warrants to brokers		—		—		249		—			—			—			249
Issuance of options		—		—		529		—			—			—			529
Cash received for subscription receivable		—		—		—		—			250			—			250
Net loss		—		—		—		(12,202	)		—			682			(11,520	)
Balance at May 31, 2013		12,692	$	1.269	$	65,536	$	(24,183	)	$	—		$	5,603		$	46,957

Net loss	—		—		—		(631	)		—		(40	)		(671	)
Balance at June 30, 2013	12,692	$	1.269	$	65,536	$	(24,814	)	$	—	$	5,564		$	46,287
Issuance of shares, net of offering costs of $895	643		0.064		3,605		—			—		—			3,605
Issuance of warrants with preferred stock	—		—		2,395		—			—		—			2,395
Issuance of shares for debentures	87		0.009		542		—			—		—			542
Net income (loss)	—		—		—		(3,480	)		—		243			(3,237	)
Balance at December 31, 2013	13,422	$	1.342	$	72,078	$	(28,294	)	$	—	$	5,806		$	49,591

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Red Mountain Resources, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1. Organization

Red Mountain Resources, Inc. is a ~~growth-oriented~~Texas corporation ~~energy~~formed ~~company~~on ~~engaged~~January ~~in the acquisition~~23, ~~development~~2014. ~~and~~On ~~exploration~~January of31, ~~oil~~2014, ~~and~~the ~~natural~~Company ~~gas~~changed ~~properties~~its instate ~~established~~of ~~basins~~incorporation ~~with~~from ~~demonstrable~~the ~~prolific~~State ~~producing~~of Florida ~~zones.~~to ~~Currently,~~ the ~~Company~~State ~~has~~of ~~established~~Texas ~~acreage~~by ~~positions~~merging ~~and~~Red ~~production~~Mountain ~~primarily~~Resources, inInc., ~~the~~a ~~Permian~~Florida ~~Basin~~corporation of(“RMR ~~West~~FL”), ~~Texas~~with and into ~~Southeast~~Red ~~New~~Mountain ~~Mexico~~Resources, ~~and~~Inc., ~~the~~a ~~onshore Gulf Coast of~~ Texas corporation. ~~The~~RMR ~~Company’s~~FL ~~focus~~was isformed toin ~~grow~~January ~~production~~2010 and ~~reserves~~acquired byBlack ~~acquiring~~Rock ~~and developing an inventory of long-life~~Capital, LLC ~~low risk drilling opportunities~~ in ~~and~~a ~~around~~reverse ~~producing~~merger ~~oil~~effective ~~and~~July ~~natural~~1, ~~gas properties~~2011. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “Red Mountain” and “Company” refer to Red Mountain Resources, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.

2The Company is a Dallas-based growth-oriented energy company engaged in the acquisition, development and exploration of oil and natural gas properties in established basins with demonstrable prolific producing zones. ~~Significant~~ ~~Accounting~~Currently, ~~Policies~~the Company has established acreage positions and production in the Permian Basin of West Texas and Southeast New Mexico and the onshore Gulf Coast of Texas. Additionally, the Company has an established and growing acreage position in Kansas.

Reverse stock split

On January 31, 2014, RMR FL effected a reverse stock split of RMR FL’s common stock, par value $0.00001 per share (“RMR FL Common Stock”), at an exchange ratio of 1-for-10 (the “Reverse Stock Split”), together with a proportional reduction in the number of authorized shares of RMR FL Common Stock from 500.0 million shares to 50.0 million shares. The par value of RMR FL Common Stock did not change as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. As of January 31, 2014, every ten shares of RMR FL Common Stock were combined into one share of RMR FL Common Stock, reducing the number of outstanding shares of RMR FL Common Stock from approximately 134.0 million to approximately 13.4 million. In addition, a proportionate adjustment was made to the per share exercise price and the number of shares issuable upon the exercise of all outstanding warrants to purchase shares of RMR FL Common Stock. All share and per share amounts and calculations have been retroactively adjusted to reflect the effects of the Reverse Stock Split.

2. Going Concern

These consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of accounting principles applicable to a going concern. These principles assume that the Company will be able to realize its assets and discharge its obligations in the normal course of operations for the foreseeable future.

The Company incurred a net loss of $2.9 million during the three months ended September 30, 2014. At September 30, 2014, the outstanding principal amount of the Company’s debt was $31.7 million, net of an aggregate discount of $1.5 million, and the Company had a working capital deficit of $31.9 million. Of the outstanding debt, $26.8 million is outstanding under the Company’s Credit Facility (as defined below). Of the $31.9 million working capital deficit at September 30, 2014, $26.8 million relates to the reclassification of the full amount of the outstanding borrowings under the Company's Credit Facility from a long-term liability to a short-term liability on its Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2014. The Company is currently in default under the Credit Facility, and the lender has the right to accelerate all amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility upon notice to the borrowers. The Company is in discussions with the lender regarding either a waiver of the non-compliance or an amendment to the credit agreement to cure the non-compliance. While the Company anticipates obtaining a waiver from the lender, it cannot provide any assurance that these negotiations will be successful. The Company is exploring available financing options, including the sale of debt or equity. If the Company is unable to finance its operations on acceptable terms or at all, its business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected. As a result of recurring losses from operations and a working capital deficiency, there is substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amount and classification of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.

3. Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Red Mountain Resources, Inc. and its subsidiaries. The condensed consolidated financial statements and related footnotes are presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”).

The Company has prepared the accompanying unaudited interim financial statements pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and in the opinion of management, such financial statements reflect all adjustments necessary to present fairly the consolidated financial position of the Company at ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014 and June 30, 2014 and its results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The Company has omitted certain information and disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP pursuant to those rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures it has made are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. These unaudited interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and related footnotes included in its most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In preparing the accompanying financial statements, management has made certain estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts in the financial statements and disclosures. The results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results the Company expects for the full fiscal year. The Company has not made any changes in its significant accounting policies from those disclosed in its most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.

The Company effected a reverse stock split of its outstanding common stock at a ratio of one-for-ten (1:10) on January 31, 2014. Retroactive application of the reverse stock split is required and all share and per share information included for all periods presented in these financial statements reflect the reverse stock split.

On July 17, 2013, the Company’s board of directors approved a change in the Company’s fiscal year end from May 31 to June 30, effective as of June 30, 2013. The change in the Company’s fiscal year end resulted in a one-month transition period that began on June 1, 2013 and ended on June 30, 2013.

As a result of this change, in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations, the Company compares the three-month period ended December 31, 2013 with the previously reported three-month period ended November 30, 2012 and the six-month period ended December 31, 2013 with the previously reported six-month period ended November 30, 2012. Financial information for the three and six months ended December 31, 2012 has not been included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the following reasons: (i) the three and six months ended November 30, 2012 provide a meaningful comparison for the three and six months ended December 31, 2013; (ii) there are no significant factors, seasonal or other, that would impact the comparability of information if the results for the three and six months ended December 31, 2012 were presented in lieu of results for the three and six months ended November 30, 2012; and (iii) it was not practicable or cost justified to prepare this information.

Business Combinations

The Company accounts for business combinations under the acquisition method of accounting in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). The acquisition method requires that assets acquired and liabilities assumed including contingencies be recorded at their fair values as of the acquisition date. The Company has finalized the determination of the fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed for Cross Border Resources, Inc. (“Cross Border”).

Noncontrolling Interests

Subsequent to January 28, 2013, the Company accounts for the noncontrolling interest in Cross Border Resources, Inc. (“Cross Border”) in accordance with ASC Topic 810, Consolidation (“ASC 810”). ASC 810 establishes accounting and reporting standards for ownership interests in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest, changes in a parent’s ownership interest and the valuation of retained noncontrolling equity investments when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. ASC 810 also establishes reporting requirements that provide sufficient disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interest of the parent and the interests of the noncontrolling owner. In addition, this guidance provides for increases and decreases in the Company’s controlling financial interests in consolidated subsidiaries to be reported in equity similar to treasury stock transactions.

~~Investments~~Debentures - Held to Maturity

Prior to January 28, 2013, the Company’s investment in Cross Border was accounted for under the equity method of accounting based on the Company’s significant influence. The determination of whether the Company exercises significant influence with respect to an investee depends on an evaluation of several factors, including, among others, ownership level. Under the equity method of accounting, an investee company’s accounts are not reflected within the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations; however, the Company’s share of the earnings or losses of the investee company is reflected in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and the Company’s carrying value in an equity method investee company is reflected in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company evaluates these investments for other-than-temporary declines in value each quarterly period. Any impairment found to be other than temporary would be recorded through a charge to earnings.

Investments in Non-Performing Debentures

The Company’s investments in non-performing debentures were initially recorded at cost which the Company believes was fair value. Management estimated cash flows expected to be collected considering the contractual terms of the loans, the nature and estimated fair value of collateral, and other factors it deemed appropriate. The estimated fair value of the loans at acquisition was significantly less than the contractual amounts due under the terms of the loan agreements.

Since, at the acquisition date, the Company expected to collect less than the contractual amounts due under the terms of the loans based, at least in part, on the assessment of the credit quality of the borrower, the loans are accounted for in accordance with ASC Topic 310-30, Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality (“ASC 310-30”). The difference between the contractually required payments on the loans as of the acquisition date and the total cash flows expected to be collected, or non-accretable difference, is not recognized and totaled $2.51 million and $12.51 million, plus accrued interest in arrears, as of ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~November~~ June 30, ~~2012~~2014, respectively.

Debentures are classified as non-accrual when management is unable to reasonably estimate the timing or amount of cash flows expected to be collected from the debentures or has serious doubts about further collectability of principal or interest. As of ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~May~~June 3130, ~~2013~~2014, all of the Company’s debentures were on non-accrual status since the borrower remains under the supervision of the bankruptcy court.

The Company periodically re-evaluates cash flows expected to be collected for each debenture based upon all available information as of the measurement date. Subsequent increases in cash flows expected to be collected are recognized prospectively through an adjustment to the debenture’s yield over its remaining life, which may result in a reclassification from non-accretable difference to accretable yield. Subsequent decreases in cash flows expected to be collected are evaluated to determine whether a provision for loan loss should be established. If decreases in expected cash flows result in a decrease in the estimated fair value of the debenture below its amortized cost, the debenture is deemed to be impaired, and the Company will record a provision for impairment to write the debenture down to its estimated fair value. The Company did not record ~~any~~an impairment ~~on the debentures~~ during the ~~six~~three months ended ~~December~~September ~~31, 2013 and November~~ 30, ~~2012~~2014.

The Company’s investments in non-performing debentures are classified as held to maturity because the Company has the intent and ability to hold them until maturity.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~July~~August ~~2013~~2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) ~~2013~~2014-1115, Presentation of ~~Unrecognized~~Financial ~~Tax~~Statements ~~Benefit~~- ~~When~~Going aConcern ~~Net~~(Subtopic 205-40): ~~Operating~~Disclosure ~~Loss~~of ~~Carryforward,~~Uncertainties aabout ~~Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists,~~ an ~~amendment~~Entity’s Ability to ~~FASB~~Continue ~~Accounting~~as ~~Standards~~a ~~Codification~~Going ~~Topic~~Concern ~~740, Income Taxes~~ (“ASU ~~2013~~2014-1115”)~~. ASU 2013-11 clarifies that an unrecognized tax benefit~~, which orrequires amanagement ~~portion~~to ~~of an unrecognized tax benefit~~evaluate, ~~should~~at beeach ~~presented~~annual inand ~~the~~interim ~~financial~~reporting ~~statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward~~period, awhether ~~similar~~there ~~tax~~are ~~loss,~~conditions or aevents ~~tax~~that raise ~~credit~~substantial ~~carryforward~~doubt ifabout ~~such settlement is required or expected in~~ the ~~event~~entity’s ~~the~~ability ~~uncertain~~to ~~tax~~continue ~~position~~as ~~is disallowed. In situations where~~ a ~~net~~going ~~operating~~concern ~~loss~~within ~~carryforward,~~one ayear ~~similar~~after ~~tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward is not available at~~ the ~~reporting~~ date ~~under~~ the tax law of the applicable jurisdiction or the tax law of the jurisdiction does not require, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements asare aissued ~~liability~~ and ~~should~~provide ~~not~~related ~~be combined with deferred tax assets~~disclosures. ASU ~~2013~~2014-1115 is effective ~~prospectively~~ for ~~fiscal~~annual ~~years, and interim~~ periods ~~within~~ending ~~those~~after ~~years~~December 15, ~~beginning~~2016 and ~~after~~interim ~~December~~periods 15thereafter, ~~2013.~~and ~~Retrospective~~early ~~application~~adoption is permitted. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact the adoption of ASU ~~2013~~2014-1115 onwill ~~its~~have ~~consolidated~~on ~~financial~~the ~~statements~~Company’s ~~and~~consolidated financial ~~statement disclosures~~statements.

34. Oil and Natural Gas Properties and Other Property and Equipment

Oil and Natural Gas Properties

The following table sets forth the capitalized costs under the successful efforts method for oil and natural gas properties:

(in thousands)	December 31, 2013			May 31, 2013
	September 30,			June 30,
	2014			2014
(in thousands)
Oil and natural gas properties:
Proved	$	7185,~~498~~146		$	6382,~~891~~362
Unproved		19,~~796~~043			19,~~539~~109
Total oil and natural gas properties		91104,~~294~~189			83101,~~430~~471
Less accumulated depletion and impairment		(1321,~~959~~456	)		(919,~~140~~138	)
Net oil and natural gas properties capitalized costs	$	7782,~~335~~733		$	7482,~~290~~333

At ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~May~~June 3130, ~~2013~~2014, the capitalized costs of the Company’s oil and natural gas properties included (i) $3638.98 million and $39.20 million, respectively, relating to acquisition costs of proved properties which are being amortized by the unit-of-production method using total proved reserves and (ii) $2545.58 million and $2639.86 million, respectively, relating to exploratory well costs and additional development costs which are being amortized by the unit-of-production method using proved developed reserves.

During the three ~~and six~~ months ended September ~~December 31~~30, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~November 30~~2013, ~~2012,~~ the Company ~~did~~incurred ~~not~~$0.5 ~~incur~~million ~~any~~and ~~significant~~$0 million in exploratory drilling costs. The Company transferred ~~had~~$30,000 noand ~~transfers~~$0 of exploratory well costs to proved properties during the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~ 2014 and ~~November 30~~2013, ~~2012~~respectively.

The Company recorded an impairment of approximately $36,000 related to its unproved oil and natural gas properties during the three months ended September 30, 2014.

Capitalized costs related to proved oil and natural gas properties, including wells and related equipment and facilities, are evaluated for impairment based on the Company’s analysis of undiscounted future net cash flows. If undiscounted future net cash flows are insufficient to recover the net capitalized costs related to proved properties, then the Company recognizes an impairment charge in income equal to the difference between the carrying value and the estimated fair value of the properties. Estimated fair values are determined using discounted cash flow models. The discounted cash flow models include management’s estimates of future oil and natural gas production, operating and development costs and discount rates. The Company did not record any impairment charges on its proved properties for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.

The Company recorded no impairment during the three and six months ended December 31, 2013. The Company recorded $0.4 million of impairment related to its unproved oil and natural gas properties for the three and six months ended November 30, 2012 related to expiring acreage.

Other Property and Equipment

The historical cost of other property and equipment, presented on a gross basis with accumulated depreciation and amortization is summarized as follows:

(in thousands)	December 31, 2013			May 31, 2013
	September 30,			June 30,
Other property and equipment	$	1,191		$	1,026
	2014			2014
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(271	)		(184	)
(in thousands)
Net property and equipment	$	920		$	842
Other property and equipment	$	1,139		$	1,196
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		(521	)		(359	)
Net property and equipment	$	618		$	837

45. Asset Retirement Obligations

The following table summarizes the changes in the Company’s asset retirement obligations (“AROs”) for the ~~six~~periods ~~months ended December 31, 2013 and the fiscal year ended May 31, 2013~~indicated:

(in thousands)	December 31, 2013			May 31, 2013
	Three Months Ended September 30,			Fiscal Year EndedJune 30,
Asset retirement obligations at beginning of period	$	5,019		$	836
	2014			2014
Liabilities incurred		49			22
(in thousands)
Liabilities settled		—			(53	)
Asset retirement obligations at beginning of period	$	5,745		$	5,020
Acquisitions		—			3,728
Liabilities incurred		5			75
Accretion expense		135			150
Liabilities settled		(36	)		(2	)
Revisions in estimated liabilities		8			296
Accretion expense		34			267
Asset retirement obligations at end of period		5,211			4,979
Revisions in estimated liabilities		—			385
Less: current portion		242			228
Asset retirement obligations at end of period		5,748			5,745
Long-term portion	$	4,969		$	4,751
Less: current portion		178			214
Long-term portion	$	5,570		$	5,531

During the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~December~~September 3130, 2013 ~~and the fiscal year ended May 31~~, ~~2013,~~ the Company recorded an upward ~~revisions~~revision to previous estimates for its ARO primarily due to changes in the estimated ~~future~~ future cash outlays.

6. Derivatives

At September 30, 2014, the Company had the following commodity derivatives positions outstanding:

Commodity and Time Period	Contract Type	Volume Transacted	Contract Price
Crude Oil
October 1, 2014―November 30, 2014	Swap	2,000 Bbls/month	$	93.50/Bbl
October 1, 2014―December 31, 2014	Put	1,979-8,330 Bbls/month		$95.00 - $100.00/Bbl
October 1, 2014―January 31, 2015	Put	6,000 Bbls/month	$	95.00/Bbl

~~5. Derivatives~~The following table summarizes the fair value of the Company’s open commodity derivatives as of September 30, 2014 and June 30, 2014:

At December 31, 2013, the Company had the following commodity derivatives positions outstanding:

	Balance Sheet Location		Fair Values
			September 30,		June 30,
			2014		2014
(in thousands)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Commodity derivatives	Commodities derivative asset	$	189	$	37

Commodity derivatives	Commodities derivative liability	$	—	$	(121	)

Commodity and Time Period		Contract Type	Volume Transacted	Contract Price
Crude Oil
January 1, 2014―August 31, 2014	Collar - Minimum	Option	437-1,936 Bbls/month	$80.00/Bbl
January 1, 2014―August 31, 2014	Collar - Maximum	Option	437-1,936 Bbls/month	$100.50/Bbl
January 1, 2014―November 30, 2014		Swap	2,000 Bbls/month	$93.50/Bbl
January 1, 2014―February 28, 2014		Swap	1,000 Bbls/month	$106.50/Bbl
January 1, 2014―March 31, 2014		Put	2,000 Bbls/month	$95.00/Bbl

The following table summarizes the change in the fair value of the Company’s commodity derivatives:

The following table summarizes the fair value of the Company’s open commodity derivatives as of December 31, 2013 and May 31, 2013:

	Income Statement Location	Three Months Ended September 30,
		2014		2013
(in thousands)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Commodity derivatives	Gain (loss) on commodity derivatives	$	269	$	(384	)

	Balance Sheet Location	Fair Value
		December 31,		May 31,
(in thousands)		2013		2013
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Commodity derivatives	Commodities derivative asset	$	—	$	265
Commodity derivatives	Commodities derivative liability	$	54	$	34

Unrealized gains and losses, at fair value, are included on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets as current or non-current assets or liabilities based on the anticipated timing of cash settlements under the related contracts. Changes in the fair value of the Company’s commodity derivatives contracts are recorded in earnings as they occur and included in other income (expense) on the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company estimates the fair values of swap contracts based on the present value of the difference in exchange-quoted forward price curves and contractual settlement prices multiplied by notional quantities. The Company internally valued the option contracts using industry-standard option pricing models and observable market inputs. The Company uses its internal valuations to determine the fair values of the contracts that are reflected on its Consolidated Balance Sheets. Realized gains and losses are also included in other income (expense) on its Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The following tables summarize the change in the fair value of the Company’s commodity derivatives:

	Income Statement Location	Three Months Ended,
		December 31,		November 30,
(in thousands)		2013		2012
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Commodity derivatives	Realized gain on commodity derivatives	$	37	$	—
	Unrealized gain on commodity derivatives		64		—
		$	101	$	—

	Income Statement Location	Six Months Ended,
		December 31,			November 30,
(in thousands)		2013			2012
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Commodity derivatives	Realized loss on commodity derivatives	$	(51	)	$	—
	Unrealized gain on commodity derivatives		(231	)		—
		$	(282	)	$	—

Unrealized gains and losses, at fair value, are included on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as current or non-current assets or liabilities based on the anticipated timing of cash settlements under the related contracts. Changes in the fair value of the Company’s commodity derivatives contracts are recorded in earnings as they occur and included in other income (expense) on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company estimates the fair values of swap contracts based on the present value of the difference in exchange-quoted forward price curves and contractual settlement prices multiplied by notional quantities. The Company internally valued the option contracts using industry-standard option pricing models and observable market inputs. The Company uses its internal valuations to determine the fair values of the contracts that are reflected on its Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. Realized gains and losses are also included in other income (expense) on the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The Company is exposed to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by the counterparties on its commodity derivatives positions and has considered the exposure in its internal valuations. However, the Company does not anticipate nonperformance by the counterparties over the term of the commodity derivatives positions.

In connection with the closing of the Senior First Lien Secured Credit Agreement (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”) with Cross Border, Black Rock Capital, Inc. (“Black Rock”) and RMR Operating, LLC (collectively with the Company, the “Borrowers”) and Independent Bank, as Lender (the “Lender”), the Company was required to enter into hedging agreements effectively hedging at least 50% of the oil volumes of the Company and its subsidiaries. At the same time, the Company entered into a Novation Agreement with BP Energy Company, ~~LP (“BP Energy”)~~ that transferred Cross Border’s then-existing swap agreements to the Company. Pursuant to an Inter-Borrower Agreement ~~between~~among the ~~Company and Cross Border~~Borrowers, the Company allocates these swap agreements back to Cross Border and may allocate future hedging agreements related to Cross Border’s production to Cross Border. See ‘Note 8. Debt-Credit Facility.”

67. Fair Value Measurements

Fair value measurements are based upon inputs that market participants use in pricing an asset or liability, which are classified into two categories: observable inputs and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs represent market data obtained from independent sources, whereas unobservable inputs reflect a company’s own market assumptions, which are used if observable inputs are not reasonably available without undue cost and effort. These two types of inputs are further prioritized into the following fair value input hierarchy:

● Level 1 - quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. ● Level 2 - quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g. interest rates) and inputs derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means. ● Level 3 - unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.


●	Level 2 - quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g. interest rates) and inputs derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

●	Level 3 - unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

The fair value input hierarchy level to which an asset or liability measurement in its entirety falls is determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the measurement in its entirety.

The following table summarizes the valuation of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities at ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~May~~June 3130, ~~2013~~2014:

	Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
(in thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets or Liabilities (Level 1)		Significant or Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)			Fair Value at December 31, 2013
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets or Liabilities (Level 1)		Significant or Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)			Fair Value at September 30, 2014
(in thousands)
Assets:
Commodity derivatives	$	—	$	—189		$	—		$	—189
2009A and 2009B Debentures of O&G Leasing, LLC (nonrecurring)		—		—			4,820			4,820
Oil and gas properties impairment (non-recurring)		—		—			(36	)		(36	)
Total	$	—	$	—189		$	~~4,820~~(36	)	$	~~4,820~~153
Liabilities:
Asset retirement obligations (non-recurring)	$	—	$	—		$	(5,~~211~~748	)	$	(5,~~211~~748	)
Commodity derivative		—		(54	)		—			(54	)
Environmental remediation liability		—		—			(2,057	)		(2,057	)
Environmental remediation liability		—		—			(2,088	)		(2,088	)
Total	$	—	$	—		$	(7,805	)	$	(7,805	)
Total	$	—	$	(54	)	$	(7,299	)	$	(7,353	)

	Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets or Liabilities (Level 1)		Significant or Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)			Fair Value at June 30, 2014
(in thousands)
Assets:
Commodity derivatives	$	—	$	37		$	—		$	37
Oil and gas properties impairment (non-recurring)		—		—			(487	)		(487	)
Total	$	—	$	37		$	(487	)	$	(450	)

Liabilities:
Asset retirement obligations (non-recurring)	$	—	$	—		$	(5,745	)	$	(5,745	)
Commodities derivative liability		—		(121	)		—			(121	)
Environmental remediation liability		—		—			(2,067	)		(2,067	)
Total	$	—	$	(121	)	$	(7,812	)	$	(7,933	)

The following is a summary of changes to fair value measurements using Level 3 inputs during the quarter ended September 30, 2014:

(in thousands)	Environmental Liability

Balance, June 30, 2014	$	(2,067	)
Settlement of liabilities		10
Balance, September 30, 2014	$	(2,057	)

	Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
(in thousands)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets or Liabilities (Level 1)		Significant or Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)			Fair Value at May 31, 2013
Assets:
Commodity derivatives	$	—	$	265		$	—		$	265
Oil and gas properties impairment (nonrecurring)		—		—			(411	)		(411	)
2009A and 2009B Debentures of O&G Leasing, LLC (nonrecurring)		—		—			4,279			4,279
Total	$	—	$	265		$	3,868		$	4,133
Liabilities:
Asset retirement obligations (non-recurring)	$	—	$	—		$	(4,979	)	$	(4,979	)
Commodity derivative		—		(34	)		—			(34	)
Environmental remediation liability		—		—			(2,088	)		(2,088	)
Total	$	—	$	(34	)	$	(7,067	)	$	(7,101	)

8. Debt

7. Debt

As of the dates indicated, the Company’s debt consisted of the following:

(in thousands)	December 31, 2013		May 31, 2013
	September 30,		June 30,
Credit Agreement	$	14,800	$	19,800
	2014		2014
Subordinated Note		—		500
(in thousands)
Convertible notes payable, net of discount of $0 and $442, respectively		—		3,308
Credit Facility	$	26,800	$	26,800
Mandatorily redeemable preferred, net of discount of $3,300 and $0, respectively		8,631		—
Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock and accrued dividends, net of discount of $1,464 and $1,561, respectively		4,898		4,801
Total debt		2331,~~431~~698		2331,~~608~~601
Less: short-term portion		—26,800		~~3,808~~—
Long-term debt	$	234,~~431~~898	$	1931,~~800~~601

Credit Facility

On February 5, 2013, the Company entered into the Credit Agreement with ~~Cross Border, Black Rock Capital, Inc. and RMR Operating, LLC (~~the ~~Company,~~Borrowers ~~Cross Border, Black Rock Capital, Inc.~~ and ~~RMR Operating, LLC, jointly and severally, the “Borrowers”) and Independent Bank, as~~ Lender. The Credit Agreement provides for an up to $100.0 million revolving credit facility (as amended, the “Credit Facility”) with ~~an initial commitment of $20.0 million and~~ a maturity date of February 5, 2016. The borrowing base under the Credit Facility is determined at the discretion of the Lender based on, among other things, the Lender’s estimated value of the proved reserves attributable to the Borrowers’ oil and natural gas properties that have been mortgaged to the Lender, and is subject to regular redeterminations on September 30 and March 31 of each year, and interim redeterminations described in the Credit Agreement and potentially monthly commitment reductions, in each case which may reduce the amount of the borrowing base. As ~~Effective~~of September 1230, ~~2013~~2014, the borrowing base was ~~increased to~~ $30.0 million ~~from $20~~.0 million. As of December 31, 2013, the borrowing base and commitment were $30.0 million. As of December 31, 2013, the Company had $14.8 million outstanding under the Credit Facility and had availability of $12.6 million.

~~Amounts~~A ~~outstanding~~portion ~~under~~of the Credit Facility, ~~bear~~in ~~interest~~an ataggregate amount anot ~~rate per annum equal~~ to ~~the~~exceed ~~greater of (x) the U~~$2.S.0 ~~prime~~million, ~~rate~~may asbe ~~published~~used ~~in The Wall Street Journal’s “Money Rates” table in effect from time~~ to ~~time~~issue ~~and~~letters ~~(y)~~of ~~4.0%.~~credit ~~Interest~~for ~~is payable monthly in arrears on~~ the ~~last~~account ~~day~~ of ~~each calendar month~~Borrowers. AsThe ofBorrowers ~~December~~may ~~31,~~be ~~2013,~~required to ~~the~~prepay ~~interest rate was 4%. Borrowings under~~ the Credit Facility ~~are~~in ~~secured by first priority liens on substantially all~~ the ~~property~~event of ~~each~~a ofborrowing ~~the~~base ~~Borrowers~~deficiency ~~and~~as ~~are~~a ~~unconditionally~~result ~~guaranteed~~of byover-advances, ~~Doral~~sales ~~West~~of ~~Corp.~~oil and ~~Pure~~gas ~~Energy~~properties or ~~Operating,~~terminations ~~Inc., each a subsidiary~~ of ~~Cross~~hedging ~~Border~~transactions.

~~The~~Amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility ~~Agreement~~bear ~~also~~interest ~~contains~~at ~~financial~~a ~~covenants,~~rate ~~measured~~per asannum equal to the greater of (x) the U.S. prime rate as published in The Wall Street Journal’s “Money Rates” table in effect from time to time and (y) 4.0% (4.0% at September 30, 2014). Interest is payable monthly in arrears on the last day of each ~~fiscal~~calendar ~~quarter~~month. ofBorrowings under the ~~Company.~~Credit AsFacility ofare secured by first priority liens on ~~December~~substantially ~~31,~~all ~~2013,~~the property of each of the ~~Company~~Borrowers ~~was~~and inare ~~compliance~~unconditionally ~~with~~guaranteed ~~these~~by ~~covenants~~Doral West Corp. and Pure Energy Operating, Inc., each a subsidiary of Cross Border.

12Under the Credit Agreement, the Borrowers are required to pay fees consisting of (i) an unused facility fee equal to 0.5% multiplied by the average daily unused commitment amount, payable quarterly in arrears until the commitment is terminated; (ii) a fronting fee payable on the date of issuance of each letter of credit and annually thereafter or on the date of any increase or extension thereof, equal to the greater of (a) 2.0% per annum multiplied by the face amount of such letter of credit or (b) $1,000; and (iii) an origination fee (x) of $200,000, and (y) payable on any date the commitment is increased, an additional facility fee equal to 1.0% multiplied by any increase of the commitment above the highest previously determined or redetermined commitment.

~~Pursuant~~The ~~to the~~ Credit Agreement, atcontains ~~least~~negative ~~one~~covenants that ofmay limit the Borrowers’ isability ~~required~~ to, ~~have~~among ~~acceptable~~other ~~hedge~~things, ~~agreements~~incur inliens, ~~place~~incur atadditional ~~all~~indebtedness, ~~times~~enter ~~effectively~~into ~~hedging~~mergers, sell atassets, ~~least~~make ~~50%~~investments ofand ~~the~~pay ~~oil~~dividends. ~~volumes~~The Credit Agreement permits the payment of cash dividends on the ~~Borrowers~~Company’s 10.0% ~~Pursuant~~Series toA ~~the~~Convertible ~~terms~~Redeemable ofPreferred Stock (the ~~Credit~~“Series ~~Agreement,~~A Preferred Stock”) so long as the Company ~~has~~is ~~hedge~~not otherwise ~~agreements~~in ~~with~~default BPunder ~~Energy~~the ~~hedging~~Credit aAgreement ~~portion~~and payment of such cash dividends would not cause the ~~future~~Company ~~oil~~to ~~production~~be ofin default under the ~~Borrowers~~Credit Agreement.

~~Notes Payable~~11

~~Subordinated~~The ~~Note~~Credit Agreement also contains financial covenants, measured as of the last day of each fiscal quarter of Red Mountain, requiring the Borrowers to maintain a ratio of (i) the Borrowers’ and their consolidated subsidiaries’ consolidated current assets (inclusive of the unfunded commitment amount under the Credit Agreement) to consolidated current liabilities (exclusive of the current portion of long-term debt under the Credit Agreement) of at least 1.00 to 1.00; (ii) the Borrowers’ and their subsidiaries’ consolidated “Funded Debt” to consolidated EBITDAX (for the four fiscal quarter period then ended) of less than 3.50 to 1.00; and (iii) the Borrowers’ and their subsidiaries’ consolidated EBITDAX less paid and accrued dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock to interest expenses (each for the four fiscal quarter period then ended) of at least 3.00 to 1.00. Funded Debt is defined in the Credit Agreement as the sum of all debt for borrowed money, whether as a direct or reimbursement obligor, but excludes shares of Series A Preferred Stock. EBITDAX is defined in the Credit Agreement as (a) consolidated net income plus (b) (i) interest expense, (ii) income taxes, (iii) depreciation, (iv) depletion and amortization expenses, (v) dry hole and exploration expenses, (vi) non-cash losses or charges on any hedge agreements resulting from derivative accounting, (vii) extraordinary or non-recurring losses, (viii) expenses that could be capitalized under GAAP but by election of Borrowers are being expensed for such period under GAAP, (ix) costs associated with intangible drilling costs, (x) other non-cash charges, (xi) one-time expenses associated with transactions associated with (b)(i) through (iv), minus (c)(i) non-cash income on any hedge agreements resulting from FASB Statement 133, (ii) extraordinary or non-recurring income, and (iii) other non-cash income.

OnAmounts ~~February~~outstanding 6,under ~~2013,~~ the ~~Company~~Credit Facility ~~issued~~may anbe ~~Unsecured~~accelerated ~~Subordinated~~and ~~Promissory~~become ~~Note~~immediately ~~(as~~due ~~amended~~and payable upon specified events of default of Borrowers, ~~the~~including, among ~~“Subordinated~~other ~~Note”)~~things, a default in the ~~aggregate~~payment of principal, ~~amount~~interest ofor ~~$500,000~~other ~~payable~~amounts todue ~~Hyman~~under ~~Belzberg~~the Credit Facility, ~~William~~certain loan ~~Belzberg~~documents ~~and~~or ~~Caddo~~hydrocarbon ~~Management~~hedge agreements, ~~Inc.~~failure ~~(the~~to ~~“Note~~perform ~~Lender”).~~or Onobserve ~~July~~covenants ~~30,~~under ~~2013~~the Credit Facility, ~~the~~a ~~Company~~material inaccuracy ~~entered~~of ~~into~~a ~~Amendment~~representation ~~No.~~or 1warranty, ~~(the~~a ~~“Amendment”)~~default with regard to ~~the~~certain ~~Subordinated~~loan ~~Note~~documents towhich ~~extend~~remains unremedied for a period of 30 days following notice, a default in the ~~maturity~~payment ~~date~~of other indebtedness of the ~~Subordinated~~Borrowers ~~Note~~of ~~from~~$200,000 ~~July~~or 31more, bankruptcy ~~2013~~or toinsolvency, ~~August~~certain 31changes in control, ~~2013. The~~failure ~~Subordinated~~of ~~Note~~the ~~accrued~~Lender’s security interest atin aany ~~rate~~portion of ~~12%~~the collateral ~~per~~with ~~annum,~~a ~~payable~~value ~~monthly. Upon~~greater anthan ~~event~~$500,000, cessation of ~~default,~~any ~~interest~~security ~~would~~document ~~accrue~~to onbe ~~all~~in ~~outstanding~~full ~~principal~~force atand aeffect, ~~rate~~or Alan ofBarksdale ~~the~~ceasing ~~lesser~~to ofbe ~~(i)~~Red ~~18%~~Mountain’s ~~per~~Chief ~~annum~~Executive Officer or ~~(ii)~~Chairman ~~the~~of ~~maximum~~Cross ~~rate~~Border ~~permitted~~and bynot ~~applicable~~being ~~law~~replaced with an officer acceptable to the Lender within 30 days.

OnPursuant ~~August~~to ~~28,~~the ~~2013~~Credit Agreement, at least one of the ~~Company~~Borrowers ~~repaid~~is required to have acceptable hedge agreements in place at all times effectively hedging at least 50% of the oil ~~Subordinated~~volumes ~~Note~~of the Borrowers. Red Mountain has outstanding hedge agreements with various counterparties hedging a portion of the ~~proceeds~~future ~~from~~oil ~~its~~production ~~common~~of the ~~stock~~Borrowers. ~~offering~~However, these hedge agreements did not comply with the volume and time period requirements of the Credit Agreement as of September 30, 2014.

~~Convertible~~As ~~Promissory~~of ~~Notes~~September 30, 2014, the Borrowers had collectively borrowed $26.8 million and had availability of $3.2 million under the Credit Facility. On October 14, 2014, the Company borrowed an additional $1.0 million under the Credit Facility. The Company was not in compliance with all of the financial covenants and the hedge agreement covenant under the Credit Facility described above at September 30, 2014, which constitutes an event of default under the Credit Facility, and the Lender has the right to accelerate all amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility upon notice to the Borrowers. As a result, the Company has recorded the full amount of its outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility as a current liability on its Consolidated Balance Sheet as of September 30, 2014.

On November 25, 2011, the Company issued a $1.0 million convertible promissory note to Hohenplan Privatstiftung (the “2011 Hohenplan Note”), a $1.5 million convertible promissory note to Personalversorge der Autogrill Schweiz AG (the “Personalversorge Note”) and a $250,000 convertible promissory note to SST Advisors, Inc. (the “SST Note” and collectively with the 2011 Hohenplan Note and the Personalversorge Note, the “Convertible Notes”). On July 30, 2012, the Company issued a $1.0 million convertible promissory note (the “2012 Hohenplan Note”) to Hohenplan Privatstiftung.

In August 2013, the Company sold 100,002 Units in cancellation of the 2011 Hohenplan Note, the 2012 Hohenplan Note and the SST Note. In November 2013, the Company paid in full the Personalversorge Note with cash. Prior to cancellation of these notes, the Company expensed the unamortized beneficial conversion feature, debt issuance costs and discounts totaling $0.3 million to interest expense.

Mandatorily Redeemable Preferred Stock

The Company’s Series A Preferred Stock is mandatorily redeemable and is not convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company classifies the Series A Preferred Stock as a long-term liability, and the Company records dividends paid or accrued as interest expense in the Company’s Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations.

In August 2013, the Company closed offerings of ~~476~~376,~~687~~685 Units ~~(the “Units”)~~, ~~including 100,002 Units sold in cancellation of $2.3 million in debt under convertible notes payable to Hohenplan Privatstiftung and SST Advisors, Inc.,~~ raising net cash proceeds of $7.1 million. Each Unit consisted of one share of Series A Preferred Stock and one warrant to purchase up to 2.5 shares of common stock at a price of $22.50 per Unit. The warrants are exercisable until the earlier of (i) August 2016 or (ii) the first trading day that is at least 30 days after the date that the Company has provided notice to the holders of the warrants by filing a Current Report on Form 8-K stating that the common stock has (A) achieved a 20 trading day volume weighted average price of $15.00 per share or more and (B) traded, in the aggregate, 300,000 shares or more over the same 20 consecutive trading days for which the 20 trading day volume weighted average price was calculated; provided, that clause (ii) shall only be applicable so long as a warrant is exercisable for shares of common stock. The warrants have an exercise price of $10.00 per share. The warrants issued with the Series A Preferred Stock were valued at $2.4 million. The value of the warrants is treated as a discount to the Series A Preferred Stock and will be accreted over the life of the mandatorily redeemable preferred stock. Management determined the fair value using a probability weighted Black-Scholes option model with a volatility based on the historical closing price of common stock of industry peers and the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the OTCBB on the date of issuance. The volatility and remaining term was approximately 55% and three years, respectively.

1412

The Series A Preferred Stock is mandatorily redeemable on July 15, 2018 at $25.00 per share, plus accrued and unpaid dividends to the redemption date, for a total redeemable value of $11.9 million at the time of issuance. The difference between the $11.9 million redeemable value and the $10.8 million of gross proceeds and canceled debt is treated as a discount and will be accreted over the life of the Series A Preferred Stock. Effective as of April 1, 2014, the Company agreed to exchange 222,224 outstanding shares of its Series A Preferred Stock for the issuance of 1,388,898 shares of common stock. After the exchange, the Company had 254,463 shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding with an aggregate redemption amount of $6.4 million as of September 30, 2014.

For the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014, the Company recognized total interest expense of $0.3 million ~~and $0.9 million, respectively,~~ related to the Series A Preferred Stock, which includes accretion of discount and ~~amortization of~~ issuance ~~costs~~cost of $0.21 million ~~and $0.3 million~~ for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013, respectively~~2014.

Schedule of Future Debt Payments

The following is a schedule by fiscal year of future principal payments required under the Company’s outstanding debt as of ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014:

(in thousands)
Fiscal Years Ending June 30,
2016			14,800
2015	$	26,800
2017			—
2016		—
2018			—
2017		—
2019			11,917
2018		—
Total			26,717
2019		6,362
Discount			(3,286	)
Total		33,162
Total, net value		$	23,431
Discount		(1,464	)
Total, net value	$	31,698

~~8. Earnings Per Share~~13

9. Earnings Per Share

The Company reports basic earnings per common share, which excludes the effect of potentially dilutive securities, and diluted earnings per common share, which includes the effect of all potentially dilutive securities unless their impact is anti-dilutive. The following are reconciliations of the numerators and denominators of basic and diluted earnings per share:

	Three Months Ended,						Six Months Ended,
		Three Months Ended September 30,
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)		December 31, 2013			November 30, 2012			December 31, 2013			November 30, 2012
		2014			2013
Net loss (numerator):
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Net loss – basic		$	(2,205	)	$	(3,238	)	$	(3,480	)	$	(6,947	)
Net loss (numerator):
Weighted average shares (denominator):
Net loss – basic		$	(2,892	)	$	(1,129	)
Weighted average shares – basic			13,372			9,053			13,147			8,904
Weighted average shares (denominator):
Dilution effect of share-based compensation, treasury method(1)			—			—			—			—
Weighted average shares – basic			14,857			12,922
Weighted average shares – diluted			13,372			9,053			13,147			8,904
Dilution effect of share-based compensation, treasury method(1)			—			—
Loss per share:
Weighted average shares – diluted			14,857			12,922
Basic		$	(0.16	)	$	(0.36	)	$	(0.26	)	$	(0.78	)
Loss per share:
Diluted		$	(0.16	)	$	(0.36	)	$	(0.26	)	$	(0.78	)
Basic		$	(0.19	)	$	(0.10	)
Diluted		$	(0.19	)	$	(0.10	)

(1) ~~Warrants~~Approximately to1,349,051 ~~purchase~~and ~~approximately~~ 1,~~553~~653,~~560~~559 shares of ~~the Company’s~~ common stock ~~were~~underlying ~~excluded~~warrants ~~from this calculation because they were anti-dilutive during the three and six months ended December 31, 2013. Warrants~~ to purchase ~~approximately 86,100~~ shares of the Company’s common stock were excluded from this calculation because they were anti-dilutive during the ~~three~~periods ~~and~~ended ~~six~~September ~~months~~30, ~~ended~~2014 ~~November~~and 302013, ~~2012~~respectively.

9. Equity

During the three months ended December 31, 2013, the Company entered into a Debenture Purchase Agreement with a holder of Senior Series 2009A Debentures and Series 2009B Debentures (collectively, the “2009 Debentures”) of O&G Leasing, LLC for the purchase of an aggregate of $1.1 million principal amount of 2009 Debentures, plus accrued and unpaid interest, in exchange for the issuance of 0.9 million shares of common stock of the Company.

In August 2013, the Company closed an offering of 642,857 shares of common stock, raising net cash proceeds of $3.6 million after issuance costs of $0.9 million.

10. Commitments and Contingencies

Litigation

~~Cross Border, Cross Border’s former Chief Executive Officer, and Cross Border’s former Chief Operating Officer are party to a lawsuit with a former employee.~~ On May 4, 2011, Clifton M. (Marty) Bloodworth ~~initially~~ filed a lawsuit in the State District Court of Midland County, Texas, against Doral West Corp. d/b/a Doral Energy Corp. ~~(the predecessor entity of Cross Border) (“Doral Energy”)~~ and Everett Willard Gray II~~, Cross Border’s former Chief Executive Officer~~. ~~Mr.~~ ~~Bloodworth later amended his lawsuit to name Horace Patrick Seale, Cross Border’s former Chief Operating Officer, as an additional defendant.~~ Mr. Bloodworth ~~generally~~ alleges that Mr. Gray ~~and Mr. Seale~~, as ~~agents~~CEO of Cross Border, made false representations which induced Mr. Bloodworth to enter into an employment contract that was subsequently breached by Cross Border. The claims that Mr. Bloodworth has alleged are: breach of his employment agreement with Doral ~~Energy~~West Corp, ~~fraud in the inducement and~~ common law fraud, civil conspiracy, breach of fiduciary duty, and violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices-Consumer Protection Act. Mr. Bloodworth is seeking damages of approximately $280,000. Mr. Gray, ~~Mr. Seale~~ and Cross Border deny that Mr. Bloodworth’s claims have any merit.

Cross Border was previously party to an engagement letter, dated February 7, 2012 (the “Engagement Letter”), with KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc. (“KeyBanc”) pursuant to which KeyBanc was to act as exclusive financial advisor to Cross Border’s board ~~Board~~ of ~~Directors~~directors in connection with a possible “Transaction” (as defined in the Engagement Letter). The Engagement Letter was formally terminated by Cross Border on August 21, 2012. The Engagement Letter provided that KeyBanc would be entitled to a fee upon consummation of a Transaction within a certain period of time following termination of the Engagement Letter. On May 16, 2013, KeyBanc delivered an invoice to Cross Border inrepresenting ~~the~~a ~~amount~~fee and out-of-pocket expenses ~~$751,334, representing amounts~~ purportedly owed by Cross Border to KeyBanc as a result of the consummation of a purported Transaction that KeyBanc asserts had been consummated within the required time period ~~and its out-of-pocket expenses in connection therewith~~. Cross Border ~~disputes~~disputed that any Transaction was consummated and that KeyBanc iswas entitled to any fees or out-of-pocket expenses. ~~The~~Cross ~~matter~~Border filed a complaint seeking (i) a declaration that it was ~~originally~~not liable to KeyBanc for any amounts in connection with the Engagement Letter, (ii) attorneys’ fees, and (iii) costs of suit. KeyBanc filed bya ~~Cross~~counterclaim ~~Border~~seeking (i) compensatory damages, (ii) interest, (iii) expenses and court costs, and (iv) reasonable and necessary attorneys’ fees. The matter was originally filed in the 44th-B Judicial District Court for the State of Texas, Dallas County but was subsequently removed to the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division. On August 26, ~~where~~2014, Cross Border entered into a settlement agreement with KeyBanc, ~~filed~~settling a ~~counterclaim~~lawsuit ~~against~~between ~~Cross~~the ~~Border~~parties. In connection with the settlement, Cross Border ~~intends~~agreed to ~~vigorously~~pay ~~defend~~KeyBanc $900,000 in three equal installments of $300,000 each on or before August 28, 2014, October 31, 2014 and December 31, 2014, and the ~~action~~parties agreed to mutual releases of liability related to the Engagement Letter. The Company fully accrued this amount at June 30, 2014. The Company paid the first installment and the remaining installments are recorded in accrued expenses on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2014.

In addition to the foregoing, in the ordinary course of business, the Company is periodically a party to various litigation matters that it does not believe will have a material adverse effect on its results of operations or financial condition.

Environmental ~~issues~~Issues

The Company is subject to federal and state laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. Environmental risk is inherent in all oil and natural gas operations, and the Company could be subject to environmental cleanup and enforcement actions. The Company manages this environmental risk through appropriate environmental policies and practices to minimize the impact to the Company.

16As of September 30, 2014, the Company had approximately $2.1 million in environmental remediation liabilities related to Cross Border’s operated Tom Tom and Tomahawk fields located in Chaves and Roosevelt counties in New Mexico. In February 2013, the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) accepted Cross Border’s remediation plan for the Tom Tom and Tomahawk fields. Cross Border is working in conjunction with the BLM to initiate remediation on a site-by-site basis. This is management’s best estimate of the costs of remediation and restoration with respect to these environmental matters, although the ultimate cost could differ materially. Inherent uncertainties exist in these estimates due to unknown conditions, changing governmental regulation, and legal standards regarding liability, and emerging remediation technologies for handling site remediation and restoration. Cross Border has incurred approximately $43,000 in costs and expects to incur the remaining expenditures during the Company’s fiscal year ending June 30, 2015.

As of December 31, 2013 and May 31, 2013, the Company had approximately $2.1 million in environmental remediation liabilities related to Cross Border’s operated Tom Tom and Tomahawk fields located in Chaves and Roosevelt counties in New Mexico. In February 2013, the Bureau of Land Management (“BLM”) accepted Cross Border’s remediation plan for the Tom Tom and Tomahawk fields. Cross Border is working in conjunction with the BLM to initiate remediation on a site-by-site basis. This is management’s best estimate of the costs of remediation and restoration with respect to these environmental matters, although the ultimate cost could differ materially. Inherent uncertainties exist in these estimates due to unknown conditions, changing governmental regulation, and legal standards regarding liability, and emerging remediation technologies for handling site remediation and restoration. Cross Border expects to incur these expenditures over an eighteen month period beginning in January 2014.

Leases

As of ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014, the Company rented various office spaces in Dallas, Texas; Midland, Texas; and Lafayette, Louisiana ~~and rented corporate housing in Richardson, Texas~~ under non-cancelable lease agreements. In the aggregate, these leases cover approximately 16,884 square feet at a cost of approximately $24,000 per month and have remaining lease terms ranging from 42 months to 3324 months. The following is a schedule by year of future minimum rental payments required under these lease arrangements as of ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014:

(in thousands)
Fiscal Years Ending June 30,
2014	$	131
2015	$	147
2015		206
2016		181
2017		45
2018		—
Total	$	~~563~~373

Rent expense under the Company’s lease arrangements amounted to approximately $6474,000 and $7069,000 for the three months ended ~~December~~September ~~31, 2013 and November~~ 30, ~~2012,~~2014 ~~respectively. Rent expense under the Company’s lease arrangements amounted to approximately $133,000~~ and ~~$149,000 for the six months ended December 31,~~ 2013 ~~and November 30~~, ~~2012,~~ respectively.

11. Related Party Transactions

~~The~~Enerstar ~~Company~~Resources ~~entered~~O&G, ~~into~~LLC (“Enerstar”), a ~~drilling~~company ~~consulting~~owned ~~agreement~~by ~~with~~Tommy ~~R.K. Ford and Associates~~Folsom, ~~and a contract for drilling services with Western Drilling on~~ the ~~Company’s~~former ~~Madera~~Executive ~~24-2H,~~Vice ~~Madera~~President ~~25-2H,~~ and ~~Madera~~Director ~~19-4H wells. At the time, each~~ of ~~these~~Exploration ~~entities~~and ~~were~~Production ~~owned~~for orRMR Operating, ~~partially owned by Randell K. Ford~~LLC, a ~~then-current~~subsidiary ~~director~~ of the Company~~. Mr. Ford passed away in December 2013. During the three months ended December 31~~, ~~2013~~ and ~~November~~formerly ~~30, 2012, these entities provided~~ the ~~Company~~Executive ~~with~~Vice anPresident ~~aggregate of approximately $1.7 million~~ and ~~$15,000,~~Director ~~respectively,~~ of ~~services,~~Exploration ofand ~~which~~Production for ~~$0.7~~the ~~million and $0~~Company, ~~respectively,~~owns ~~remained~~an ~~unpaid~~overriding atroyalty ~~the~~interest ~~end~~in of the ~~respective~~Company’s ~~periods~~Madera Prospect. During the ~~six~~three months ended ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~November 20~~2013, ~~2012, these entities provided~~ the Company ~~with~~paid anroyalties ~~aggregate~~ of approximately $~~1.9~~7,000 ~~million~~ and $153,000, respectively, ofto ~~services, of which $0~~Enerstar.~~7 million and $0, respectively, remained unpaid at the end of the respective periods.~~

In addition, the Company is a party to a lease agreement with R.K. Ford and Associates, pursuant to which the Company leases office space in Midland, Texas. During the three months ended December 31, 2013 and November 30, 2012, the Company paid approximately $0 and $6,000, respectively, to R.K. Ford and Associates pursuant to the lease agreement. During the six months ended December 31, 2013 and November 30, 2012, the Company paid approximately $2,000 and $13,000, respectively, to R.K. Ford and Associates pursuant to the lease agreement. The lease agreement expired in July 2013.15

12. Subsequent Events

Reverse Stock Split and Authorized Share Reduction

On January 31, 2014, Red Mountain Resources, Inc., a Florida corporation (“RMR FL”), effected a reverse stock split of RMR FL’s common stock, par value $0.00001 per share (“RMR FL Common Stock”), at an exchange ratio of 1-for-10 (the “Reverse Stock Split”), together with a proportional reduction in the number of authorized shares of RMR FL Common Stock from 500.0 million shares to 50.0 million shares. The par value of RMR FL Common Stock did not change as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. As of January 31, 2014, every ten shares of RMR FL Common Stock were combined into one share of RMR FL Common Stock, reducing the number of outstanding shares of RMR FL Common Stock from approximately 134.0 million to approximately 13.4 million. In addition, a proportionate adjustment was made to the per share exercise price and the number of shares issuable upon the exercise of all outstanding warrants to purchase shares of RMR FL Common Stock.

Change of State of Incorporation

On January 31, 2014, RMR FL changed its state of incorporation from the State of Florida to the State of Texas by merging (the “Reincorporation”) with and into its wholly-owned subsidiary, Red Mountain Resources, Inc., a Texas corporation, with Red Mountain Resources, Inc., a Texas corporation, continuing as the surviving corporation. As a result, as of January 31, 2014:

(i) RMR FL ceased to exist;

(ii) shareholders of RMR FL automatically became shareholders of Red Mountain, without any action by such shareholders, and began to be governed by (a) the Texas Business Organizations Code, (b) Red Mountain’s Certificate of Formation, and (c) Red Mountain’s Bylaws;

(iii) the name, business, management, fiscal year, accounting, location of the principal executive offices, assets and liabilities of RMR FL became the name, business, management, fiscal year, accounting, location of the principal executive offices, assets and liabilities of Red Mountain; and

(iv) the directors and officers of RMR FL prior to the Reincorporation continued as the directors and officers of Red Mountain after the Reincorporation for an identical term of office.

The Company’s common stock, on a split-adjusted basis, has a new CUSIP number of 75678V 302.

Increase in Borrowings Under Credit Facility

On, January 21, 2014, the Company withdrew $5.0 million under its Credit Facility with Independent Bank. As of January 21, 2014, the Company had $19.8 million outstanding under the Credit Facility and had availability of $7.6 million.

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Unless the context otherwise requires, all references to “Red Mountain,” the “Company,” “we,” “our” and “us” refer to (i) Red Mountain Resources, Inc., ~~a Texas corporation~~ (~~“Red Mountain”), (~~ii) Red Mountain’s wholly owned subsidiaries, including Black Rock Capital, Inc. (“Black Rock”) and RMR Operating, LLC (“RMR Operating”), and (iii) subsequent to January 28, 2013, Cross Border Resources, Inc. (“Cross Border”). As of ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014, we owned 83% of the outstanding common stock of Cross Border. Acreage, reserves and production information presented subsequent to January 28, 2013 includes acreage, reserves and production represented by the 17% of Cross Border’s common stock not owned by us.

Overview

We are a Dallas-based growth-oriented energy company engaged in the acquisition, development and exploration of oil and natural gas properties in established basins with demonstrable prolific producing zones. Currently, we have established acreage positions and production in the Permian Basin of West Texas and Southeast New Mexico and the onshore Gulf Coast of Texas. Additionally, we have an established and growing acreage position in Kansas.

We plan to grow production and reserves by acquiring, exploring and developing an inventory of long-life, low risk drilling opportunities with attractive rates of return. Our focus is on opportunities in and around producing oil and natural gas properties where we can enhance production and reserves through application of newer drilling and completion techniques, infill drilling targeting untapped but known productive hydrocarbon strata, and enhanced oil recovery applications.

As of ~~January~~November 3117, 2014, we owned interests in 887,~~341~~501 gross (310,~~103~~392 net) mineral and lease acres in New Mexico, Texas and Kansas, of which 336,~~837~~331 gross (3130,~~139~~926 net) acres are within the Permian Basin. We have successfully leased 9,~~388~~868 net acres in Kansas located on the Central Kansas Uplift, and we also owned interests in over 1,405 net acres located on the Villarreal, Frost Bank, Resendez, Peal Ranch and La Duquesa Prospects in the Gulf Coast of Texas.

OnAs ~~January~~of 28September 30, ~~2013~~2014, we ~~closed~~had $26.8 million of borrowings under our Senior First Lien Secured Credit Agreement (as amended, the ~~acquisition~~“Credit ofAgreement”) with 5Cross Border,~~091~~ Black Rock and RMR Operating (collectively with the Company,~~210~~ ~~shares~~the of“Borrowers”) ~~common~~and ~~stock~~Independent Bank, ofas ~~Cross~~Lender ~~Border~~(the “Lender”), ~~bringing~~which ~~our~~provides ~~total~~for ~~ownership~~an up to ~~approximately~~$100.0 ~~78%~~million ofrevolving credit facility (as amended, the ~~outstanding~~“Credit ~~Cross~~Facility”). ~~Border~~This ~~common~~indebtedness ~~stock~~is secured by substantially all of our assets and the assets of our subsidiaries. ~~Prior~~The Credit Agreement contains covenants which require us to maintain compliance with certain financial ratios, aging of accounts payable and maintenance of agreements that hedge the ~~acquisition~~price of oil. As of September 30, 2014, we ~~owned~~were ~~47%~~not in compliance with certain of ~~Cross~~these ~~Border’s~~covenants ~~outstanding~~and, ~~common~~as ~~stock~~a result, ~~and~~the Lender has the ~~investment~~right ~~was~~to ~~accounted~~accelerate ~~for~~all amounts outstanding under the ~~equity~~Credit ~~method~~Facility ofupon ~~accounting~~notice to the Borrowers. ~~Subsequent~~Due to ~~this~~the ~~transaction~~noncompliance, we ~~account~~have ~~for~~(i) ~~Cross~~reclassified ~~Border~~the full amount of the outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility from a long-term liability to a short-term liability on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2014 and (ii) included a “going concern” note in our consolidated ~~subsidiary~~financial statements. AsWe ofare ~~December~~in ~~31,~~discussions ~~2013,~~with wethe ~~owned~~Lender ofregarding ~~record~~either ~~14,327,767~~a ~~shares~~waiver of ~~Cross~~the ~~Border~~non-compliance ~~common~~or ~~stock~~an amendment to the Credit Agreement to cure the non-compliance. While we anticipate obtaining a waiver from the Lender, ~~representing~~we ~~83%~~cannot ofprovide ~~Cross~~any assurance ~~Border’s~~that ~~outstanding~~these ~~common~~negotiations ~~stock~~will be successful.

~~Recent Developments~~16

~~Convertible~~Fiscal ~~Promissory~~2015 ~~Note.~~First OnQuarter ~~November~~Operational ~~22, 2013, we paid in full the $1.5 million convertible promissory note, plus accrued and unpaid interest, to Personalversorge der Autogrill Schweiz AG, and the note was terminated.~~Update

~~Reverse~~Net ~~Stock~~production ~~Split~~sold ~~and~~for ~~Authorized~~the ~~Share~~quarter ended ~~Reduction.~~September ~~On January 31~~30, 2014, ~~Red~~was ~~Mountain Resources~~100,000 ~~Inc.,~~barrels aof ~~Florida~~oil ~~corporation~~equivalent (“~~RMR FL~~Boe”), ~~effected~~or ~~a reverse stock split of RMR FL’s common stock~~1,087 ~~par~~Boe ~~value $0.00001~~ per ~~share~~day (“~~RMR FL Common Stock~~Boe/d”), atbased anon ~~exchange~~actual calendar ~~ratio~~days ofduring ~~1-for-10 (~~the ~~“Reverse Stock Split”)~~period, ~~together~~inclusive ~~with a proportional reduction in the number~~ of ~~authorized shares of RMR FL Common Stock from 500~~9.06 ~~million shares to 50.0 million shares. The par value of RMR FL Common Stock did not change as a result of the Reverse Stock Split. As of January 31~~Mboe, ~~2014,~~or ~~every~~105 ~~ten shares of RMR FL Common Stock were combined into one share of RMR FL Common Stock~~Boe/d, ~~reducing the number~~ of ~~outstanding~~prior ~~shares~~period ~~of RMR FL Common Stock from approximately 134~~adjustments.0 million to approximately 13.4 million. In addition, a proportionate adjustment was made to the per share exercise price and the number of shares issuable upon the exercise of all outstanding warrants to purchase shares of RMR FL Common Stock.

19During the three months ended September 30, 2014, we completed two wells (0.2 net) at our Turkey Track Prospect, worked over three wells (2.8 net) in the Tom Tom Area, and drilled five gross (five net) wells in Kansas. We recently commenced the completion of the Madera 25 Federal 2H well.

~~All~~During ~~share~~the quarter, we completed the Zircon 2 B1EH State 2H well, our first well targeting the 1st Bone Spring reservoir at our Turkey Track Prospect. It was completed in July 2014 and ~~per~~achieved ~~share~~a ~~amounts~~maximum 24-hour production rate of 632 Boe/d (of which 87% was oil) and ~~calculations~~a 10-day average production rate of 549 Boe/d (of which 81% was oil). We own an approximately 13% working interest and 9% net revenue interest in this ~~Quarterly~~well. ~~Report~~The Bradley 31 B2DA Federal Com 1H well, a horizontal well targeting the 2nd Bone Spring, was completed in September 2014 and achieved a maximum 24-hour production rate of 889 Boe/d (of which 88% was oil) and a 10-day average production rate of 790 Boe/d (of which 88% was oil). We own an approximately 7% working interest and 5% net revenue interest in this well. In October 2014, we spud the Perla ~~accompanying~~Verde ~~consolidated~~31 ~~condensed~~State ~~financial~~2H, ~~statements~~a ~~have~~horizontal ~~been~~well ~~retroactively~~targeting ~~adjusted to~~the ~~reflect~~3rd Bone Spring, in which we own an approximately 6.3% working interest and 4.7% net revenue interest. In November 2014, we spud the ~~effects~~Scooter ofFederal Com 1H and the ~~reverse~~ ~~stock~~Zircon ~~split~~12/7 B2JK Federal Com 1H horizontal wells targeting the 2nd Bone Spring, in which we own an approximately 0.8% working interest and 0.6% net revenue interest and an approximately 16% working interest and 12% net revenue interest, respectively. All three of these wells are non-operated wells and are currently drilling.

~~Change~~In ofthe ~~State~~Tom ofTom ~~Incorporation.~~Area, Onwe ~~January~~continued 31our workover program completing work on three wells in the field during the three months ended September 30, 2014. In the first of these, ~~RMR~~on the FLStrange ~~changed~~Federal ~~its~~1 ~~state~~well, ofwe ~~incorporation~~added ~~from~~perforations, treated the ~~State~~well with acid, and fracture stimulated the well, increasing its production from less than 1 Bbl/d of ~~Florida~~oil to approximately 6 Bbl/d oil. We own a 100% working interest and an approximately 75% net revenue interest in the ~~State~~well. ofWe ~~Texas~~also bycompleted ~~merging~~work (on the ~~“Reincorporation”)~~Wattam ~~with~~Federal 4 and ~~into~~Hahn ~~its~~Federal ~~wholly-owned~~7 ~~subsidiary,~~wells ~~Red~~during ~~Mountain~~the first quarter, adding new perforations to the Hahn Federal 7 well and treating both wells with ~~Red~~acid. ~~Mountain~~We ~~continuing~~are asawaiting flowback results on both of these workovers. We own a 100% working interest and 77% net revenue interest in the ~~surviving~~Wattam ~~corporation~~Federal 4 well, and an approximately 78% working interest and 64% net revenue interest in the Hahn Federal 7 well. As In October 2014, we commenced work on the Loveless LQ State 2 well, a ~~result~~well in the Tom Tom Area in which we own an approximately 65% working interest and 57% net revenue interest. We added new perforations, astreated ofthe ~~January~~well 31with acid, ~~2014:~~and are currently awaiting flowback results.

~~(i) RMR~~During FLthe ~~ceased~~quarter, we also drilled five wells in Rush County, Kansas, targeting the Arbuckle, Basal Penn, Reagan, and Lansing-Kansas City formations. Three of these wells, the Besperat 1, Koriel 1, and Elder 1 wells, did not encounter commercial hydrocarbons and were plugged and abandoned. The Stalcup 1 well was completed in the Arbuckle formation in September 2014 and is currently producing. The well has averaged approximately 8 Bbl/d of oil since its completion. As of September 30, 2014, the Gisick 1 well was drilled and awaiting completion. We own a 100% working interest and a net revenue interest ranging from 83% to ~~exist;~~88% in these five wells.

(iv) the directors and officers of RMR FL prior to the Reincorporation continued as the directors and officers of Red Mountain after the Reincorporation for an identical term of office.

On January 31, 2014, our common stock commenced trading on a split-adjusted basis under a new OTC Bulletin Board trading symbol, “RDMPD.” The new trading symbol was assigned by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority in connection with the approval of the Reincorporation and Reverse Stock Split. Our trading symbol will be “RDMPD” for 20 business days from January 31, 2014, after which it will revert to “RDMP.” Our common stock, on a split-adjusted basis, has a new CUSIP number of 75678V 302.

As a result of the Reincorporation, Red Mountain became the successor corporation to RMR FL under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and will succeed to RMR FL’s reporting obligations thereunder. Pursuant to Rule 12g-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, the common stock, preferred stock and warrants of Red Mountain are deemed to be registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act.

Fiscal 2014 Second Quarter Operational Update

During the three months ended December 31, 2013, we completed drilling the Madera 25 Federal Com 2H well, in which we have a 30% working interest and 23% net revenue interest. On November 28, 2013, we spudded the Madera 19 Federal Com 4H well, in which we have an 84% working interest and 63% net revenue interest. Both of these wells are long-lateral wells individually consisting of a total measured depth of approximately 16,000 feet. At December 31, 2013, the Madera 25 Federal Com 2H well was awaiting completion and the Madera 19 Federal Com 4H well was drilling.

In our non-operated Permian acreage, we participated in four development wells. These wells consisted of (i) one gross (0.2 net) horizontal 2nd Bone Spring well operated by Mewbourne Oil Co., located in the Turkey Track Field; (ii) two gross (0.3 net) vertical Glorieta-Yeso wells operated by LRE Operating LLC, located in the Red Lake Field and (iii) one gross (0.1 net) horizontal Glorieta-Yeso well operated by COG Operating LLC, located in the N. Seven Rivers Field.

Planned Operations

For the remainder of fiscal year 2014, we plan to spend up to $15.0 million for continued development, workovers and recompletions on our properties including Tom Tom, Cowden, Madera and Shafter Lake and on properties in our non-operated Permian acreage. The following sets forth our current fiscal 2014 development program (dollars in millions):

							Percentage of
	Gross		Net				Total
Target	Wells		Wells		Cost		Program
San Andres (Tom Tom, Cowden and Shafter Lake)		25.0		20.9	$	6.0		40	%
Madera (Brushy Canyon)		2.0		1.1		7.0		47
Non-operated and other		5.0		1.2		2.0		13
Total		32.0		23.2	$	15.0		100	%

Assuming successful and timely implementation of the current and planned operations, we expect to have sufficient liquidity to complete our planned operations. However, in the event of disruptions, delays or failures with current or planned operations, we will need to raise between $5.0 million to $10.0 million of additional funds to fully fund our fiscal 2014 development program. If we do not raise these additional funds, we will need to curtail or delay our fiscal 2014 development program.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). The preparation of these condensed consolidated financial statements requires management to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses and related disclosures. Our significant accounting policies are described in “Note 2—Significant Accounting Policies” to our audited consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended ~~May~~June 3130, ~~2013~~2014 and are of particular importance to the portrayal of our financial position and results of operations and require the application of significant judgment by management. These estimates are based on historical experience, information received from third parties, and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. There have been no changes to the significant accounting policies disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended ~~May~~June 3130, ~~2013~~2014.

~~Transition Period~~17

On July 17, 2013, our board of directors approved a change in our fiscal year end from May 31 to June 30, effective as of June 30, 2013. In the following “Results of Operations,” we compare the results of the three and six months ended December 31, 2013 with the previously reported three and six months ended November 30, 2012. Financial information for the three and six months ended December 31, 2012 has not been included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the following reasons: (i) the three and six months ended November 30, 2012 provide a meaningful comparison for the three and six months ended December 31, 2013; (ii) there are no significant factors, seasonal or other, that would impact the comparability of information if the results for the three and six months ended December 31, 2012 were presented in lieu of results for the three and six months ended November 30, 2012; and (iii) it was not practicable or cost justified to prepare this information.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth summary information regarding our oil and natural gas sales, net production sold, average sales prices and production costs and expenses for the three ~~and six~~ months ended ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014 and ~~November 30, 2012~~2013.

	Three Months Ended,				Six Months Ended,
	Three Months Ended
	December 31, 2013		November 30, 2012		December 31, 2013		November 30, 2012
	September 30, 2014		September 30, 2013
(dollars in thousands, except per unit prices)
Revenue
Oil and natural gas sales	$	45,~~467~~272	$	15,~~108~~774	$	~~10,241~~	$	~~2,454~~
Net Production sold
Oil (Bbl)		3648,~~884~~896		743,~~490~~649		~~80,533~~		~~19,652~~
Natural gas (Mcf)		~~202~~224,~~194~~146		~~138~~241,~~302~~017		~~443,211~~		~~279,427~~
Natural gas liquids (Bbl)		613,~~622~~728		26,~~061~~293		~~15,309~~		~~4,164~~
Total (Boe)		7799,~~205~~982		3290,~~601~~112		~~169,711~~		~~70,387~~
Total (Boe/d) (1)		~~839~~1,087		~~358~~979		~~922~~		~~385~~
Average sales prices
Oil ($/Bbl)	$	9383.0861	$	81102.4346	$	~~98.16~~	$	~~80.58~~
Natural gas ($/Mcf)		43.0217		34.0552		~~4.29~~		~~2.64~~
Natural gas liquids ($/Bbl)		3132.6517		3728.0157		~~25.44~~		~~30.83~~
Total average price ($/Boe)	$	5752.7041	$	3363.9972	$	~~60.08~~	$	~~34.80~~
Costs and expenses (per Boe)
Exploration expense	$	42.2450	$	01.3712	$	~~2.52~~	$	~~0.44~~
Production taxes		7.42		0.58		6.94		1.46
Dry hole expense		5.33		—
Lease operating expenses		9.16		6.10		8.57		8.03
Production taxes		4.19		6.72
Natural gas transportation and marketing expenses		0.48		1.07		0.44		0.84
Lease operating expenses		11.56		8.29
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment		28.00		18.13		25.05		28.39
Natural gas transportation and marketing expenses		0.98		0.42
Accretion of discount on asset retirement obligation		0.88		0.46		0.80		0.43
Depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment		24.09		23.20
General and administrative expense		24.80		44.35		22.74		58.24
Accretion of discount on asset retirement obligation		0.34		0.75
General and administrative expense		26.89		21.57

(1) Boe/d is calculated based on actual calendar days during the period.

Results of Operations—Three Months Ended December 31, 2013 Compared to Three Months Ended November 30, 2012

Revenues and Production

Oil and Natural Gas Production. During the three months ended ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014, we had net production sold of 7799,~~205 barrels of oil equivalent (“~~982 Boe”), compared to net production sold of 3290,~~601~~112 Boe during the three months ended ~~November~~ September 30, ~~2012~~2013. The increase in net production sold was primarily attributable to ~~the~~production ~~consolidation~~from ofnew ~~Cross~~wells ~~Border~~ and ~~drilled~~from ~~wells~~prior ~~coming~~period ~~online~~adjustments, partially ~~during~~offset by the ~~three~~natural ~~months~~decline ~~ended~~of ~~December~~producing ~~31, 2013~~properties. For the three months ended ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014, 4748.89% of our production was oil, ~~and 52~~37.24% was natural gas and 13.7% was natural gas liquids, compared to 2348.04% oil, ~~and 77~~44.06% natural gas and 7.0% natural gas liquids for the three months ended ~~November~~September 30, ~~2012~~2013.

Oil and Natural Gas Sales. During the three months ended December 31, 2013, we had oil and natural gas sales of $4.5 million, as compared to $1.1 million during the three months ended November 30, 2012. The increase in oil and natural gas sales was primarily attributable to the consolidation of Cross Border and drilled wells coming online during the three months ended December 31, 2013.18

22Oil and Natural Gas Sales. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, we had oil and natural gas sales of $5.3 million, as compared to $5.8 million during the three months ended September 30, 2013. The decrease in oil and natural gas sales was primarily attributable to the decrease in commodity prices.

Costs and Expenses

Exploration Expense. Exploration expense was $0.3 million for the three months ended ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014, as compared to $~~12,000~~0.1 million for the three months ended ~~November~~ September 30, ~~2012~~2013. The increase in exploration expense was primarily attributable to increased seismic ~~surveys~~activity ~~and geological and geophysical activities performed~~ during the three months ended ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014.

~~Production~~Dry ~~Taxes~~Hole Expense. ~~Production~~ ~~taxes~~Dry ~~were~~hole expense was $0.65 million for the three months ended ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014, as compared to $~~19,000~~0 million for the three months ended September ~~November~~ 30, ~~2012~~2013. The increase in ~~production~~dry ~~taxes~~hole expense was primarily attributable to ~~increased~~three ~~oil~~Kansas wells that did not encounter commercial hydrocarbons and ~~natural~~were ~~gas~~plugged ~~sales~~and abandoned.

~~Lease~~Production ~~Operating Expenses~~Taxes. ~~During~~ ~~the~~Production ~~three~~taxes ~~months ended December 31, 2013, we incurred lease operating expenses of~~ were $0.74 million, asfor ~~compared to $0.2 million during~~ the three months ended ~~November~~September 30, ~~2012.~~2014, ~~The~~as ~~increase~~compared ~~in lease operating expenses was attributable~~ to ~~the~~$0.6 ~~consolidation~~million offor ~~Cross Border and drilled wells coming online during~~ the three months ended ~~December~~September 3130, 2013.

~~Natural~~Lease ~~Gas~~Operating ~~Transportation and Marketing~~ Expenses. ~~For~~ ~~the~~During the three months ended ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014, ~~natural~~we ~~gas~~incurred ~~transportation~~lease ~~and~~operating ~~marketing~~ expenses ~~was~~of $371.2 million,~~000,~~ as compared to $~~35,000~~0.7 ~~for~~million during the three months ended ~~November~~September 30, ~~2012~~2013. The increase in lease operating expenses was attributable to new wells and workover expense that was not incurred in the prior year.

~~Depreciation,~~Natural ~~Depletion,~~Gas ~~Amortization~~Transportation and ~~Impairment~~Marketing Expenses. For the three months ended ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014, ~~depreciation,~~natural ~~depletion,~~gas ~~amortization~~transportation and ~~impairment~~marketing expenses was $~~2.2 million~~98,000, as compared to $~~0.6~~38,000 ~~million~~ for the three months ended ~~November~~September 30, 2012. The increase in depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment was attributable to the consolidation of Cross Border, depletion of the wells that came online during the three months ended December 31, 2013~~, and the prior upward revision of asset retirement obligations in December 2012, partially offset by decreased impairment for the three months ended December 31, 2013~~.

~~General~~Depreciation, ~~and~~Depletion, ~~Administrative~~Amortization ~~Expense. General~~ and ~~administrative expense was $1~~ Impairment.9 ~~million~~For ~~for~~ the three months ended ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014, depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment was $2.4 million, as compared to $12.41 million for the three months ended ~~November~~September 30, ~~2012~~2013. The increase in ~~general~~depreciation, depletion, amortization and ~~administrative~~impairment ~~expense~~ was ~~primarily~~ attributable to ~~increased~~additional ~~personnel~~wells ~~costs of approximately $0.3 million and an increase~~ in ~~professional~~our ~~fees~~Madera ~~of approximately $55,000~~field.

~~Other~~General and Administrative Expense. ~~Other~~ General and administrative expense was $02.87 million for the three months ended ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014, as compared to ~~other expense of~~ $21.09 million for the three months ended ~~November~~September 30, ~~2012~~2013. The ~~decrease~~increase in ~~other~~general and administrative expense was due primarily ~~attributable~~ to anapproximately ~~unrealized~~$1.0 million ~~loss on investment in Cross Border warrants and equity in earnings~~ of ~~Cross~~non-recurring ~~Border~~expenses ~~during~~related ~~the~~to ~~three~~our ~~months~~cancelled ~~ended~~preferred ~~November~~stock ~~30,~~offering ~~2012,~~in ~~which~~September ~~were~~2014 ~~eliminated~~and inincreased ~~2013~~professional fees ~~upon~~associated ~~consolidation~~with ofour ~~Cross~~internal ~~Border~~control improvements.

~~Results~~Other ofExpense. ~~Operations—Six~~Other ~~Months~~expense ~~Ended~~was ~~December~~$0.4 million 31for the three months ended September 30, ~~2013~~2014, ~~Compared~~as compared to ~~Six~~other ~~Months~~expense ~~Ended~~of ~~November~~$1.3 million for the three months ended September 30, ~~2012~~2013. The decrease in other expense was primarily attributable to a decrease in interest expense and an increased cash and non-cash gains from commodity derivatives contracts.

Revenues and Production

Oil and Natural Gas Production. During the six months ended December 31, 2013, we had net production sold of 169,711 Boe, compared to net production sold of 70,387 Boe during the six months ended November 30, 2012. The increase in net production sold was primarily attributable to the consolidation of Cross Border and production from our Madera 24 Federal 3H well. For the six months ended December 31, 2013, 47.5% of our production was oil and 52.5% was natural gas and natural gas liquids, compared to 27.9% oil and 72.1% natural gas and natural gas liquids for the six months ended November 30, 2012.

Oil and Natural Gas Sales. During the six months ended December 31, 2013, we had oil and natural gas sales of $10.2 million, as compared to $2.5 million during the six months ended November 30, 2012. The increase in oil and natural gas sales was primarily attributable to the consolidation of Cross Border and production from our Madera 24 Federal 3H well.

Costs and Expenses

Exploration Expense. Exploration expense was $0.4 million for the six months ended December 31, 2013, as compared to $31,000 for the six months ended November 30, 2012. The increase in exploration expense was attributable to seismic surveys and geological and geophysical activities performed during the six months ended December 31, 2013.

Production Taxes. Production taxes were $1.2 million for the six months ended December 31, 2013, as compared to $0.1 million for the six months ended November 30, 2012. The increase in production taxes was attributable to increased oil and natural gas sales.

Lease Operating Expenses. During the six months ended December 31, 2013, we incurred lease operating expenses of $1.5 million, as compared to $0.6 million during the six months ended November 30, 2012. The increase in lease operating expenses was attributable to the consolidation of Cross Border and increased production from the completed producing wells on our Madera property.

Natural Gas Transportation and Marketing Expenses. For the six months ended December 31, 2013, natural gas transportation and marketing expenses was $74,000, as compared to $59,000 for the six months ended November 30, 2012.

Depreciation, Depletion, Amortization and Impairment. For the six months ended December 31, 2013, depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment was $4.3 million, as compared to $2.0 million for the six months ended November 30, 2012. The increase in depreciation, depletion, amortization and impairment was attributable to the consolidation of Cross Border, depletion of the wells that came online during the six months ended December 31, 2013, and the prior upward revision of asset retirement obligations in December 2012, partially offset by decreased impairment for the six months ended December 31, 2013.

General and Administrative Expense. General and administrative expense was $3.9 million for the six months ended December 31, 2013, as compared to $4.1 million for the six months ended November 30, 2012. The decrease in general and administrative expense was due primarily to a decrease in professional fees of approximately $0.6 million ($0.5 million of which related to professional fees for acquisitions), partially offset by higher insurance costs of approximately $22,000 related to the acquisition of Cross Border, and an increase in personnel costs of approximately $0.3 million related to increased headcount.

Other Expense. Other expense was $2.1 million for the six months ended December 31, 2013, as compared to other expense of $2.5 million for the six months ended November 30, 2012. The decrease in other expense was primarily attributable to an unrealized loss on investment in Cross Border warrants and equity in earnings of Cross Border during the six months ended November 30, 2012, which were eliminated in 2013 upon consolidation of Cross Border, partially offset by increased interest expense.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

General

Our primary ~~source~~sources of liquidity for the ~~second~~ first quarter of fiscal ~~2014~~2015 ~~was~~were borrowings under our Credit Facility and our cash flow from operations. Our ability to fund planned capital expenditures and to make acquisitions depends upon our future operating performance, availability of borrowings under ~~our $100.0 million revolving credit facility (as amended,~~ the “ Credit Facility”), and availability of equity and debt financing, which is affected by prevailing economic conditions in our industry and financial, business and other factors, some of which are beyond our control. Our cash flow from operations is mainly influenced by the prices we receive for our oil and natural gas production and the quantity of oil and natural gas we produce. Prices for oil and natural gas are affected by national and international economic and political conditions, national and global supply and demand for hydrocarbons, seasonal weather influences and other factors beyond our control and have recently declined.

2419

Capital Expenditures

Most of our capital expenditures are for the exploration, development, production and acquisition of oil and natural gas reserves. We anticipate cash capital expenditures of between up$15 tomillion and $~~15.0~~20 million for the remainder of fiscal year ~~2014~~2015. ~~See~~We “—currently ~~Planned~~do ~~Operations”~~not ~~for~~have ~~more~~access ~~information~~to ~~about~~sufficient funds for our planned ~~capital~~exploration ~~expenditures.~~or Asdevelopment ofactivities ~~December~~for ~~31,~~the ~~2013,~~next ~~assuming~~twelve ~~successful~~months and ~~timely~~will ~~implementation~~need ofadditional ~~the~~capital ~~current and planned operations, we expect~~ to ~~have~~continue ~~sufficient liquidity to complete~~ our ~~planned~~ operations~~. However,~~ inbeyond ~~the~~March ~~event~~31, ~~of disruptions~~2015, ~~delays~~ or ~~failures~~sooner ~~with~~if ~~current~~the orLender ~~planned~~accelerates ~~operations,~~the werepayment ~~will need to raise between $5.0 million to $10.0 million~~ of ~~additional funds to fully fund~~ our ~~fiscal~~obligations ~~2014~~under ~~development~~the ~~program~~Credit Facility. We Ifare wecurrently doseeking ~~not~~funding ~~raise~~for ~~these additional funds, we will need to curtail or delay~~ our ~~fiscal~~2015 ~~2014~~capital development program.

Liquidity

At ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014, we had $1.90 million in cash and cash equivalents, ~~and~~ $2326.48 million of total indebtedness under the Credit Facility and ~~the~~$4.9 ~~Company’s~~million of our 10.0% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock, ~~par value $0.0001 per share~~ (the “Series A Preferred Stock”), net of a discount of $31.3 5 million. At ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014, we had a working capital deficit of $631.29 million compared to a working capital deficit of $1.1 million at September 30, 2013. Of the $1531.79 million working capital deficit at ~~November~~September 30, ~~2012~~2014, $26.8 million relates to the reclassification of the full amount of the outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility from a long-term liability to a short-term liability on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2014.

We ~~expect~~are tocurrently ~~have~~in ~~sufficient~~default ~~cash~~under onthe ~~hand~~Credit Facility, ~~cash~~and ~~flow~~the ~~from~~Lender ~~operations~~has ~~and~~the ~~available~~right ~~borrowings~~to accelerate all amounts outstanding under ~~our~~the Credit Facility upon notice to ~~fund~~the ~~our~~Borrowers. We ~~operations~~are ~~for~~in discussions with the ~~remainder~~Lender regarding either a waiver of ~~fiscal~~the ~~2014~~non-compliance or an amendment to the Credit Agreement to cure the non-compliance. While we anticipate obtaining a waiver from the Lender, we cannot provide any assurance that these negotiations will be successful.

Financings

On November 22, 2013, we paid in full a $1.5 million convertible promissory note, plus accrued and unpaid interest, to Personalversorge der Autogrill Schweiz AG, and the note was terminated.

On, January 21, 2014, we withdrew $5.0 million under the Credit Facility. As of January 31, 2014, we had $19.8 million outstanding under the Credit Facility and had availability of $7.6 million.

Cash Flows

Net cash provided by operating activities was $51.09 million for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014, compared to net cash used in operating activities of $0.4 million for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~November~~September 30, ~~2012~~2013. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to ~~the~~an ~~consolidation~~increase in net loss of ~~Cross~~$1.6 ~~Border~~million, ~~and~~offset ~~drilled~~by ~~wells~~an ~~coming~~increase ~~online~~in ~~during~~depletion, ~~the~~depreciation, ~~six~~amortization, and ~~months~~impairment ~~ended~~of ~~December~~approximately 31$0.3 million, ~~2013~~an increase in income from commodities derivatives of approximately $0.7 million and beneficial changes in working capital items.

Net cash used in investing activities increased to $7.2.6 million for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014 from $01.56 million for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~November~~ September 30, ~~2012~~2013 due to ~~increased~~an ~~drilling~~increase ~~activity~~in ~~during~~expenditures ~~the~~for ~~six~~drilling ~~months ended December 31, 2013~~activity.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $~~3.7~~0 ~~million~~ for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014, as compared to $15.12 million for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~November~~September 30, ~~2012~~2013. Net cash provided by financing activities for the ~~six~~three months ended ~~December~~September 3130, 2013 was primarily comprised of $10.7 million of net proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock and ~~Units, consisting of~~ Series A Preferred Stock. ~~and~~These ~~warrants,~~amounts were partially offset by $75.0 5 million of payments on the Credit Facility and convertible notes payable.

25Indebtedness

Credit Facility. The Credit Agreement provides for the Credit Facility, which has a maturity date of February 5, 2016. The borrowing base under the Credit Facility is determined at the discretion of the Lender based on, among other things, the Lender’s estimated value of the proved reserves attributable to the Borrowers’ oil and natural gas properties that have been mortgaged to the Lender, and is subject to regular redeterminations on September 30 and March 31 of each year, and interim redeterminations described in the Credit Agreement and potentially monthly commitment reductions, in each case which may reduce the amount of the borrowing base. As of September 30, 2014, the borrowing base was $30.0 million.

The Senior First Lien Secured Credit Agreement (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”) with Cross Border, Black Rock and RMR Operating (Red Mountain, Cross Border, Black Rock and RMR Operating, jointly and severally, the “Borrowers”) and Independent Bank, as Lender, provides for up to a $100.0 million Credit Facility with an initial commitment of $20.0 million and a maturity date of February 5, 2016. The borrowing base under the Credit Facility is determined at the discretion of the Lender based on, among other things, the Lender’s estimated value of the proved reserves attributable to the Borrowers’ oil and natural gas properties that have been mortgaged to the Lender, and is subject to regular redeterminations on September 30 and March 31 of each year, and interim redeterminations described in the Credit Agreement and potentially monthly commitment reductions, in each case which may reduce the amount of the borrowing base. As of December 31, 2013, the borrowing base was $30.0 million.

A portion of the Credit Facility, in an aggregate amount not to exceed $2.0 million, may be used to issue letters of credit for the account of Borrowers. The Borrowers may be required to prepay the Credit Facility in the event of a borrowing base deficiency as a result of over-advances, sales of oil and gas properties or terminations of hedging transactions.

Amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the greater of (x) the U.S. prime rate as published in The Wall Street Journal’s “Money Rates” table in effect from time to time and (y) 4.0%. Interest is payable monthly in arrears on the last day of each calendar month. Borrowings under the Credit Facility are secured by first priority liens on substantially all the property of each of the Borrowers and are unconditionally guaranteed by Doral West Corp. and Pure Energy Operating, Inc., each a subsidiary of Cross Border.20

Amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the greater of (x) the U.S. prime rate as published in The Wall Street Journal’s “Money Rates” table in effect from time to time and (y) 4.0%. Interest is payable monthly in arrears on the last day of each calendar month. Borrowings under the Credit Facility are secured by first priority liens on substantially all the property of each of the Borrowers and are unconditionally guaranteed by Doral West Corp. and Pure Energy Operating, Inc., each a subsidiary of Cross Border.

Under the Credit Agreement, the Borrowers are required to pay fees consisting of (i) an unused facility fee equal to 0.5% multiplied by the average daily unused commitment amount, payable quarterly in arrears until the commitment is terminated; (ii) a fronting fee payable on the date of issuance of each letter of credit and annually thereafter or on the date of any increase or extension thereof, equal to the greater of (a) 2.0% per annum multiplied by the face amount of such letter of credit or (b) $1,000; and (iii) an origination fee (x) of $200,000, and (y) payable on any date the commitment is increased, an additional facility fee equal to 1.0% multiplied by any increase of the commitment above the highest previously determined or redetermined commitment.

The Credit Agreement contains negative covenants that may limit the Borrowers’ ability to, among other things, incur liens, incur additional indebtedness, enter into mergers, sell assets, make investments and pay dividends. The Credit Agreement permits the payment of cash dividends on our Series A Preferred Stock so long as we are not otherwise in default under the Credit Agreement and payment of such cash dividends would not cause us to be in default under the Credit Agreement.

The Credit Agreement also contains financial covenants, measured as of the last day of each fiscal quarter of Red Mountain, requiring the Borrowers to maintain a ratio of (i) the Borrowers’ and their consolidated subsidiaries’ consolidated current assets (inclusive of the unfunded commitment amount under the Credit Agreement) to consolidated current liabilities (exclusive of the current portion of long-term debt under the Credit Agreement) of at least 1.00 to 1.00; (ii) the Borrowers’ and their subsidiaries’ consolidated “Funded Debt” to consolidated EBITDAX (for the four fiscal quarter period then ended) of less than 3.50 to 1.00; and (iii) the Borrowers’ and their subsidiaries’ consolidated EBITDAX less paid and accrued dividends on the Series A Preferred Stock to interest expenses (each for the four fiscal quarter period then ended) of at least 3.00 to 1.00. Funded Debt is defined in the Credit Agreement as the sum of all debt for borrowed money, whether as a direct or reimbursement obligor, but excludes shares of Series A Preferred Stock. EBITDAX is defined in the Credit Agreement as (a) consolidated net income plus (b) (i) interest expense, (ii) income taxes, (iii) depreciation, (iv) depletion and amortization expenses, (v) dry hole and exploration expenses, (vi) non-cash losses or charges on any hedge agreements resulting from derivative accounting, (vii) extraordinary or non-recurring losses, (viii) expenses that could be capitalized under GAAP but by election of Borrowers are being expensed for such period under GAAP, (ix) costs associated with intangible drilling costs, (x) other non-cash charges, (xi) one-time expenses associated with transactions associated with (b)(i) through (iv), minus (c)(i) non-cash income on any hedge agreements resulting from FASB Statement 133, (ii) extraordinary or non-recurring income, and (iii) other non-cash income.

26Amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility may be accelerated and become immediately due and payable upon specified events of default of Borrowers, including, among other things, a default in the payment of principal, interest or other amounts due under the Credit Facility, certain loan documents or hydrocarbon hedge agreements, failure to perform or observe covenants under the Credit Facility, a material inaccuracy of a representation or warranty, a default with regard to certain loan documents which remains unremedied for a period of 30 days following notice, a default in the payment of other indebtedness of the Borrowers of $200,000 or more, bankruptcy or insolvency, certain changes in control, failure of the Lender’s security interest in any portion of the collateral with a value greater than $500,000, cessation of any security document to be in full force and effect, or Alan Barksdale ceasing to be Red Mountain’s Chief Executive Officer or Chairman of Cross Border and not being replaced with an officer acceptable to the Lender within 30 days.

Amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility may be accelerated and become immediately due and payable upon specified events of default of Borrowers, including, among other things, a default in the payment of principal, interest or other amounts due under the Credit Facility, certain loan documents or hydrocarbon hedge agreements, a material inaccuracy of a representation or warranty, a default with regard to certain loan documents which remains unremedied for a period of 30 days following notice, a default in the payment of other indebtedness of the Borrowers of $200,000 or more, bankruptcy or insolvency, certain changes in control, failure of the Lender’s security interest in any portion of the collateral with a value greater than $500,000, cessation of any security document to be in full force and effect, or Alan Barksdale ceasing to be Red Mountain’s Chief Executive Officer or Chairman of Cross Border and not being replaced with an officer acceptable to the Lender within 30 days.21

Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, at least one of the Borrowers is required to have acceptable hedge agreements in place at all times effectively hedging at least 50% of the oil volumes of the Borrowers. ~~Pursuant~~Red toMountain ~~the~~has ~~terms~~outstanding hedge agreements with various counterparties hedging a portion of the future ~~Credit~~oil ~~Agreement,~~production ~~Red~~of ~~Mountain~~the ~~has~~Borrowers. However, these hedge agreements ~~with~~did BPnot ~~Energy~~comply ~~Company,~~with LPthe ~~(“BP~~volume ~~Energy”)~~and ~~hedging~~time aperiod ~~portion~~ requirements of the ~~future~~Credit ~~oil~~Agreement ~~production~~as of ~~the~~September ~~Borrowers~~30, 2014.

As of ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014, the Borrowers had collectively borrowed $1426.8 million and had availability of $123.62 million under the Credit Facility. On October 14, 2014, we borrowed an additional $1.0 million under the Credit Facility. We were not in compliance with all of the financial covenants and the hedge agreement covenant under the Credit Facility described above at September 30, 2014, which constitutes an event of default under the Credit Facility, and the Lender has the right to accelerate all amounts outstanding under the Credit Facility upon notice to the Borrowers. As a result, we have recorded the full amount of the outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility as a current liability on our Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2014.

Series A Preferred Stock. As of September 30, 2014, we had 254,463 shares of Series A Preferred Stock outstanding. The Series A Preferred Stock is mandatorily redeemable and is not convertible into shares of our common stock. We classify the Series A Preferred Stock as a long-term liability, and we record dividends paid or accrued as interest expense in our condensed consolidated statements of operations.

AsIn ofAugust ~~December 31,~~ 2013, we ~~had~~closed ~~476~~offerings of 376,~~687~~685 Units ~~shares~~(the “Units”). Each Unit consisted of one share of Series A Preferred Stock ~~outstanding~~and one warrant to purchase up to 2. 5 shares of common stock. The ~~Series~~warrants Aare ~~Preferred~~exercisable ~~Stock~~until the earlier of (i) August 2016 or (ii) the first trading day that is ~~mandatorily~~at ~~redeemable~~least 30 days after the date that we have provided notice to the holders of the warrants by filing a Current Report on Form 8-K stating that the common stock has (A) achieved a 20 trading day volume weighted average price of $15.00 per share or more and (B) istraded, ~~not~~in ~~convertible~~the ~~into~~aggregate, 300,000 shares ofor ~~our~~more over the same 20 consecutive trading days for which the 20 trading day volume weighted average price was calculated; provided, that clause (ii) shall only be applicable so long as a warrant is exercisable for shares of common stock. We ~~classify~~The warrants have an exercise price of $10.00 per share. The warrants issued with the Series A Preferred Stock were valued at $2.4 million. The value of the warrants is treated as a ~~long-term~~discount ~~liability,~~to the Series A Preferred Stock and wewill be ~~record~~accreted ~~dividends~~over ~~paid~~the orlife ~~accrued~~of asthe ~~interest~~mandatorily ~~expense~~redeemable inpreferred stock. Management determined the fair value using a probability weighted Black-Scholes option model with a volatility based on the historical closing price of common stock of industry peers and the closing price of our ~~condensed~~common ~~consolidated~~stock ~~statements~~on the OTCBB on the date of ~~operations~~issuance. The volatility and remaining term was approximately 55% and three years, respectively.

InThe August 2013, we closed offerings of 476,687 Units (the “Units”), including 100,002 Units sold in cancellation of $2.3 million in debt, raising net proceeds of $7.1 million. Each Unit consisted of one share of Series A Preferred Stock ~~and one warrant to purchase up to 2.5 shares of common stock. The warrants are exercisable until the earlier of August 2016 or (ii) the first trading day that~~ is atmandatorily redeemable ~~least 30 days after the date that we have provided notice to the holders of the warrants by filing a Current Report~~ on ~~Form~~July ~~8-K~~15, ~~stating~~2018 ~~that~~at ~~the common stock has (A) achieved a 20 trading day volume weighted average price of~~ $1525.00 per share, orplus ~~more~~accrued and ~~(B)~~unpaid ~~traded,~~dividends into the ~~aggregate,~~redemption ~~300~~date,~~000~~ ~~shares or more over the same 20 consecutive trading days~~ for ~~which the 20 trading day volume weighted average price was calculated; provided, that clause (ii) shall only be applicable so long as~~ a ~~warrant~~total isredeemable value ~~exercisable for shares~~ of ~~common stock. The warrants have an exercise price of~~ $106.~~00 per share. The warrants issued with the Series A Preferred Stock were valued at $2.~~4 million. The value of the warrants is treated as a discount to the Series A Preferred Stock and will be accreted over the life of the mandatorily redeemable preferred stock. Management determined the fair value using a probability weighted Black-Scholes option model with a volatility based on the historical closing price of common stock of industry peers and the closing price of our common stock on the OTCBB on the date of issuance. The volatility and remaining term was approximately 55% and three years, respectively.

~~The~~For ~~Series~~the Athree ~~Preferred~~months ~~Stock~~ended isSeptember ~~mandatorily redeemable on July 15~~30, ~~2018 at $25.00 per share~~2014, we ~~plus~~recognized ~~accrued and unpaid dividends to the redemption date, for a~~ total ~~redeemable~~interest ~~value~~expense of $110.93 million. ~~The~~related ~~difference~~to ~~between~~ the ~~$11.9~~Series ~~million~~A ~~redeemable~~Preferred ~~value~~Stock, ~~and~~which ~~the~~includes ~~$10.8~~accretion ~~million~~ of ~~gross proceeds and canceled debt is treated as a~~ discount ~~and will be accreted over the life~~ of ~~the~~$0.1 ~~Series A Preferred Stock~~million.

For the three months ended December 31, 2013, we recognized total interest expense of $0.5 million related to the Series A Preferred Stock, which includes accretion of discount and issuance cost of $0.3 million.

Contractual Obligations

~~There~~The ~~were~~following notable ~~changes~~presents to our contractual obligations ~~during~~at ~~the~~September ~~three~~30, ~~months~~2014 ~~ended~~(in ~~December 31, 2013.~~thousands):

	Payments Due by Period
	Total		Less than 1 Year		1 – 3 Years		3 – 5 Years		More than 5 Years
Line of credit	$	26,800	$	26,800	$	—	$	—	$	—
Series A Preferred Stock		8,986		700		1,924		6,362		—
Environmental remediation liability		2,057		2,057		—		—		—
Asset retirement obligations		5,748		178		2,394		157		3,019
Lease obligations		373		192		181		—		—
Total	$	43,964	$	29,927	$	4,499	$	6,519	$	3,019

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Since ~~May~~June 3130, ~~2013~~2014, there have been no material changes to our off-balance sheet arrangements as reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014.

Forward-Looking Statements

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs and expectations, are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words “may,” “could,” “would,” “should,” “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “estimate,” “target,” “project,” “intend,” “understand,” or similar expressions and the negative of such words and expressions, although not all forward-looking statements contain such words or expressions.

Forward-looking statements are only predictions and are not guarantees of performance. These statements generally relate to our plans, objectives and expectations for future operations and are based on management’s current beliefs and assumptions, which in turn are based on its experience and its perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments as well as other factors it believes are appropriate under the circumstances. Although we believe that the plans, objectives and expectations reflected in or suggested by the forward-looking statements are reasonable, there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from those expressed or implied in such forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements also involve risks and uncertainties. Many of these risks and uncertainties are beyond our ability to control or predict and could cause results to differ materially from the results discussed in such forward-looking statements. Such risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the following:

●• our ability to ~~raise~~generate ~~additional~~sufficient ~~capital~~cash flow from operations, borrowings or other sources to ~~fund~~enable ~~future~~us ~~capital~~to ~~expenditures~~fully develop and produce our oil and natural gas properties;

●• ~~our~~declines ~~ability to generate sufficient cash flow from operations, borrowings~~ or ~~other~~volatility ~~sources~~in tothe ~~enable~~prices uswe toreceive ~~fully~~for ~~develop and produce~~ our oil and natural gas ~~properties~~;

●• ~~declines~~general oreconomic ~~volatility~~conditions, whether internationally, nationally or in the ~~prices~~regional weand ~~receive~~local ~~for~~market ~~our~~areas ~~oil~~in ~~and~~which ~~natural~~we ~~gas~~do business;

●• ~~general~~risks ~~economic~~associated ~~conditions,~~with ~~whether internationally~~drilling, ~~nationally~~including orcompletion inrisks, ~~the~~cost ~~regional~~overruns and ~~local~~the ~~market~~drilling ~~areas~~of innon-economic ~~which~~wells weor dodry ~~business~~holes;

●• ~~risks~~uncertainties associated with ~~drilling,~~estimates ~~including~~of ~~completion~~proved ~~risks,~~oil ~~cost overruns~~ and ~~the~~natural ~~drilling~~gas ~~of non-economic wells or dry holes~~reserves;

●• ~~uncertainties~~the ~~associated~~presence ~~with~~or ~~estimates~~recoverability of ~~proved~~estimated oil and natural gas reserves and the actual future production rates and associated costs;

●• ~~the~~risks ~~presence or recoverability of estimated oil~~ and ~~natural~~liabilities ~~gas~~associated ~~reserves~~with ~~and~~acquired ~~the~~companies ~~actual future production rates~~ and ~~associated costs~~properties;

●• risks ~~and~~related ~~liabilities~~to ~~associated~~integration ~~with~~of acquired companies and properties;

●• ~~risks~~potential ~~related~~defects toin ~~integration~~title ofto ~~acquired~~our ~~companies and~~ properties;

●• ~~potential~~cost ~~defects~~and inavailability ~~title~~of todrilling ~~our~~rigs, ~~properties~~equipment, supplies, personnel and oilfield services;

●• ~~cost~~geological ~~and~~concentration ~~availability~~ of ~~drilling~~our ~~rigs, equipment, supplies, personnel and oilfield services~~reserves;

●• ~~geological~~environmental ~~concentration~~or other governmental regulations, including legislation of ~~our~~hydraulic ~~reserves~~fracture stimulation;

●• ~~environmental~~our orability ~~other~~to ~~governmental~~secure ~~regulations,~~firm ~~including~~transportation ~~legislation~~for ofoil ~~hydraulic~~and ~~fracture~~natural ~~stimulation~~gas we produce and to sell the oil and natural gas at market prices;

●• ~~our~~exploration ~~ability to secure firm transportation for oil~~ and ~~natural~~development ~~gas we produce and to sell the oil and natural gas at market prices~~risks;

●• ~~exploration~~management’s ~~and~~ability ~~development~~to ~~risks~~execute our plans to meet our goals;

28• our ability to retain key members of our management team;

●• ~~management’s~~weather ~~ability to execute our plans to meet our goals~~conditions;

●• ~~our~~actions ~~ability~~or toinactions ~~retain~~of ~~key~~third-party ~~members~~operators of our ~~management team~~properties;

●• ~~weather~~costs ~~conditions~~and liabilities associated with environmental, health and safety laws;

~~● actions or inactions of third-party operators of our properties;~~23

●• ~~costs~~our ~~and~~ability ~~liabilities~~to ~~associated~~find ~~with~~and ~~environmental,~~retain ~~health~~highly ~~and~~skilled ~~safety laws~~personnel;

●• ~~our~~operating ~~ability~~hazards attendant to ~~find~~the oil and ~~retain~~natural ~~highly~~gas ~~skilled personnel~~business;

●• ~~operating~~competition ~~hazards~~in ~~attendant to~~ the oil and natural gas ~~business~~industry; and

●• ~~competition~~the other factors discussed under Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the ~~oil~~fiscal ~~and~~year ~~natural~~ended ~~gas~~June ~~industry;~~30, ~~and~~2014.

● the other factors discussed under Item 1A. “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2013.

Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date hereof. All such forward-looking statements and any subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or any person acting on our behalf are expressly qualified in their entirety by the cautionary statements contained or referred to in this section and any other cautionary statements that may accompany such forward-looking statements. Except as otherwise required by applicable law, we disclaim any duty to update any forward-looking statements.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Commodity Price Risk

Our major market risk exposure is the price we receive for our oil and natural gas production. Realized pricing is primarily driven by the prevailing price for oil and spot market prices for natural gas. Prices for oil and natural gas production are volatile and sometimes experience large fluctuations as a result of relatively small changes in supplies, weather conditions, economic conditions and government actions.

Pursuant to the Credit Agreement, at least one of the Borrowers is required to have acceptable hedge agreements in place at all times effectively hedging at least 50% of the oil volumes of the Borrowers. We have entered into derivative contracts, including costless collars, swaps, and puts, ~~with BP Energy,~~ which hedge the price of oil for a portion of our expected production through ~~November~~January ~~2014~~2015.

The derivative contracts economically hedge against the variability in cash flows associated with the forecasted sale of our future oil production. While the use of the hedging arrangements will limit the downside risk of adverse price movements, it may also limit future gains from favorable movements.

The costless collars provide us with a lower limit “floor” price and an upper limit “ceiling” price on the hedged volumes. The floor price represents the lowest price we will receive for the hedged volumes while the ceiling price represents the highest price we will receive for the hedged volumes. The costless collars are settled monthly.

The swaps provide us with a fixed settlement price for our hedged volumes. The swaps are settled monthly.

The puts provide a fixed floor price on a notional amount of sales volumes while allowing full price appreciation if the relevant index price closes above the floor price.

29We have elected not to designate our derivative financial instruments as hedges for accounting purposes, and accordingly, we record such contracts at fair value and recognize changes in such fair value in current earnings as they occur. Our commodity derivative contracts are carried at their fair value in earnings as they occur. We recognize unrealized and realized gains and losses related to these contracts on a mark-to-market basis in our condensed consolidated statements of operations under the caption “Gain (loss) on commodity derivatives”. Each derivative contract is evaluated separately to determine its own fair value. During the three months ended September 30, 2014, we recorded a gain on commodity derivative contracts of $0.3 million.

We have elected not to designate our derivative financial instruments as hedges for accounting purposes, and accordingly, we record such contracts at fair value and recognize changes in such fair value in current earnings as they occur. Our commodity derivative contracts are carried at their fair value in earnings as they occur. We recognize unrealized and realized gains and losses related to these contracts on a mark-to-market basis in our condensed consolidated statements of operations under the captions “Unrealized gain (loss) on commodity derivatives” and “Realized gain (loss) on commodity derivatives,” respectively. Each derivative contract is evaluated separately to determine its own fair value. During the three and six months ended December 31, 2013, we recorded an unrealized gain (loss) on commodity derivative contracts of $64,000 and $(231,000), respectively, and a realized gain (loss) on commodity derivative contracts of $37,000 and $(51,000), respectively.24

The following table summarizes our outstanding derivatives contracts with respect to future oil production as of ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014:

Commodity and Time Period	Contract Type	~~Contract Type~~	Volume Transacted	~~Volume Transacted~~	Contract Price	~~Contract Price~~
Crude Oil
January 1, 2014―August 31, 2014 Collar - Minimum		Option		437-1,936 Bbls/month		$80.00/Bbl
October 1, 2014―November 30, 2014	Swap		2,000 Bbls/month		$93.50/Bbl
January 1, 2014―August 31, 2014 Collar - Maximum		Option		437-1,936 Bbls/month		$100.50/Bbl
October 1, 2014―December 31, 2014	Put		1,979-8,330 Bbls/month		$95.00 - $100.00/Bbl
January 1, 2014―November 30, 2014		Swap		2,000 Bbls/month		$93.50/Bbl
October 1, 2014―January 31, 2015	Put		6,000 Bbls/month		$95.00/Bbl
January 1, 2014―February 28, 2014		Swap		1,000 Bbls/month		$106.50/Bbl
January 1, 2014―March 31, 2014		Put		2,000 Bbls/month		$95.00/Bbl

The fair values of our commodity derivatives are largely determined by estimates of the forward curves of the relevant price indices. As of ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013,~~2014 aand ~~10%~~June ~~increase in underlying commodity prices would reduce the fair value of these derivatives by $5~~30,~~000~~ 2014, ~~while~~ a 10% ~~decrease~~increase in underlying commodity prices would neither reduce nor increase the fair value of these derivatives by ~~$5,000~~a material amount.

Interest Rate Risk

The Credit Facility exposes us to interest risk associated with interest rate fluctuations on outstanding borrowings. At ~~December~~each 31of September 30, ~~2013~~2014 and June 30, 2014, we had $1426.8 million in outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility. We incur interest on borrowings under the Credit Facility at a rate per annum equal to the greater of (x) the U.S. prime rate as published in The Wall Street Journal’s “Money Rates” table in effect from time to time and (y) 4.0% (which interest rate was 4.0% at ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2013~~2014 and June 30, 2014). A hypothetical 10% change in the interest rates we pay on our borrowings under the Credit Facility as of ~~December~~each 31of September 30, ~~2013~~2014 and June 30, 2014 would result in an increase or decrease in our interest costs of approximately $20107,000 per year.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures. Accordingly, even effective disclosure controls and procedures can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2014 and, based on that evaluation, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2013 and, based on that evaluation, and as a result of the material weaknesses described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 31, 2013, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

~~During the three months ended December 31, 2013, we began implementing a new accounting system that is commonly used by other public oil and gas companies.~~ There have been no ~~other~~ changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during our last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

3125

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings

There have been no material changes to the pending legal proceedings discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended ~~May~~June 3130, ~~2013, except as follows:~~2014.

Cross Border, Cross Border’s former Chief Executive Officer, and Cross Border’s former Chief Operating Officer are party to a lawsuit with a former employee. On May 4, 2011, Clifton M. (Marty) Bloodworth initially filed a lawsuit in the State District Court of Midland County, Texas, against Doral West Corp. d/b/a Doral Energy Corp. (the predecessor entity of Cross Border) (“Doral Energy”) and Everett Willard Gray II, Cross Border’s former Chief Executive Officer. Mr. Bloodworth later amended his lawsuit to name Horace Patrick Seale, Cross Border’s former Chief Operating Officer, as an additional defendant. Mr. Bloodworth generally alleges that Mr. Gray and Mr. Seale, as agents of Cross Border, made false representations which induced Mr. Bloodworth to enter into an employment contract that was subsequently breached by Cross Border. The claims that Mr. Bloodworth has alleged are: breach of his employment agreement with Doral Energy, fraud in the inducement and common law fraud, civil conspiracy, breach of fiduciary duty, and violation of the Texas Deceptive Trade Practices Act. Mr. Bloodworth is seeking damages of approximately $280,000. Mr. Gray, Mr. Seale and Cross Border deny that Mr. Bloodworth’s claims have any merit.

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the risk factors discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended ~~May~~June 3130, ~~2013.~~2014, except as follows:

We were not in compliance with our covenants under our Credit Agreement as of September 30, 2014. As a result, the Lender may exercise one or more of its remedies, including the right to accelerate the repayment of all outstanding borrowings.

As of September 30, 2014, we had $26.8 million of borrowings under our Credit Facility. This indebtedness is secured by substantially all of our assets and the assets of our subsidiaries. The Credit Agreement contains covenants which require us to maintain compliance with certain financial ratios, aging of accounts payable and agreements that hedge the price of oil. As of September 30, 2014, we were not in compliance with certain of these covenants and, as a result, the Lender can declare an event of default under the Credit Agreement. In the event of an event of default, the Lender has the right to accelerate repayment of all outstanding indebtedness and take actions to collect monies owed to it, including enforcing and foreclosing on its security interest on our assets and the assets of our subsidiaries. In addition, the Lender can restrict our access to additional borrowings under the Credit Facility. As of the date hereof, the Lender has not accelerated our repayment obligations or taken any of the other actions described above.

We are in discussions with the Lender regarding either a waiver of the non-compliance or an amendment to the Credit Agreement to cure the non-compliance. However, we cannot provide any assurance that these negotiations will be successful. Even if we successfully obtain a waiver or an amendment that cures the non-compliance, we can provide no assurance that we will not violate our covenants in the future.

If the Lender were to accelerate our repayment obligation under the Credit Facility, our assets may not be sufficient to fully repay the debt and we may not be able to obtain capital from other sources at favorable terms or at all. If additional funding is required, this funding may not be available on favorable terms, if at all, or without potentially very substantial dilution to our stockholders. If we do not raise the necessary funds, we may need to curtail or cease our operations, sell certain assets and/or file for bankruptcy, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

While the Lender has not accelerated the repayment of our obligations under the Credit Facility, its ability to do so has caused all of our outstanding indebtedness under the Credit Facility to be classified as a current liability on our consolidated balance sheets at September 30, 2014.

We currently do not have sufficient funds to continue our exploration and development activities beyond March 31, 2015, or sooner if the Lender accelerates the repayment of our obligations under the Credit Facility.

The oil and natural gas industry is capital intensive. We make and expect to continue to make significant capital expenditures in our business for the exploration, development, production and acquisition of oil and natural gas reserves. Improvement in commodity prices may result in an increase in our actual capital expenditures.

We plan to spend between $15 million and $20 million during the remainder of fiscal 2015 to drill and complete wells or re-enter and complete wells. However, as of September 30, 2014, we had a working capital deficit of $31.9 million. We currently do not have sufficient funds to continue our exploration and development activities beyond March 31, 2015, or sooner if the Lender accelerates our obligations under the Credit Agreement. If we are unable to finance our operations on acceptable terms or at all, we may be forced to curtail or suspend our planned exploration and development activities and our business, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.

Our cash flows from operations and access to capital are subject to a number of variables, including:

	•	the value of our proved reserves;

	•	the level of oil and natural gas we are able to produce from existing wells;

	•	the prices at which our oil and natural gas are sold;

	•	our ability to acquire, locate and produce new reserves; and

	•	the ability of our banks to lend.

Debt financing could lead to:

	•	a substantial portion of operating cash flow being dedicated to the payment of principal and interest;

	•	us being more vulnerable to competitive pressures and economic downturns; and

	•	restrictions on our operations, including our ability to pay dividends.

If sufficient capital resources are not available, we might be forced to cease operations entirely, curtail developmental and exploratory drilling and other activities or be forced to sell some assets on an untimely or unfavorable basis, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Item 2.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Item 3.

Defaults Upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5.

Other Information

None.

3327

Item 6.

Exhibits

* Filed herewith. ** Furnished herewith.

** Furnished herewith.28

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

By: /s/ Alan W. Barksdale Alan W. Barksdale Chief Executive Officer

	RED MOUNTAIN RESOURCES, INC.

	By:	/s/ Alan W. Barksdale
		Alan W. Barksdale
		Chief Executive Officer

	By:	/s/ Hilda D. Kouvelis
		Hilda D. Kouvelis
		Chief Accounting Officer

	Date: November 17, 2014

	By:	/s/ Michael R. Uffman
		Michael R. Uffman
		Chief Financial Officer
	Date: February 10, 2014

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

* Filed herewith. ** Furnished herewith.

** Furnished herewith.30

Filing Compare · RED MOUNTAIN RESOURCES, INC.