UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

__________________________________

FORM 10-Q

__________________________________

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: ~~September~~December 136, 2009

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to _____________

Commission file number 333-134701

__________________________________

NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC.

Formed under the laws of the State of Georgia

I.R.S. Employer Identification Number 58-1404355

2305 Newpoint Parkway, Lawrenceville, GA 30043

Telephone Number: (770) 962-7220

____________________________________

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer þ Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Class	Outstanding at December 6, 2009	~~Outstanding at September 13, 2009~~
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share	100 shares	~~100 shares~~

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I: FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	Page
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 13, 2009 and March 29, 2009	2
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 6, 2009 and March 29, 2009	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three periods ended September 13, 2009 and September 14, 2008	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three periods ended December 6, 2009 and December 7, 2008	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the six periods ended September 13, 2009 and September 14, 2008	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the nine periods ended December 6, 2009 and December 7, 2008	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity as of September 13, 2009	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Equity as of December 6, 2009	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six periods ended September 13, 2009 and September 14, 2008	6
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine periods ended December 6, 2009 and December 7, 2008	6
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1716
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	31
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	31
PART II: OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	32
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	32
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	32
Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities	32
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	32
Item 5.	Other Information	32
Item 6.	Exhibits	32
	Signatures
EX10.29:	AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
EX10.30:	AMENDMENT TO EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT
EX-31.1:	CERTIFICATION OF CEO
EX-31.2:	CERTIFICATION OF CFO
EX-32.1:	CERTIFICATION OF CEO
EX-32.2:	CERTIFICATION OF CFO

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS ~~(UNAUDITED)~~

	September 13, 2009			March 29, 2009
	December 6, 2009			March 29, 2009
ASSETS	(Unaudited)
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	23,~~246~~043,~~586~~294		$	2,584,740
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,940,107 and $3,948,260, respectively		15,657,083			12,063,799
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3,832,883 and $3,948,260, respectively		15,480,963			12,063,799
Inventories		21,~~011~~962,~~475~~676			2,849,917
Prepaid expenses and deferred charges		21,~~446~~693,~~432~~154			3,332,139
Deferred tax assets		1,~~547~~490,~~737~~021			1,595,511
Income tax receivable		24,~~808~~220,~~050~~232			3,292,455
Other current assets		~~111~~84,~~196~~705			59,487
Total current assets		2627,~~828~~975,~~559~~045			25,778,048
Property, equipment and computer software, net		22,~~693~~155,~~503~~270			23,658,481
Goodwill		188,~~758~~826,~~153~~674			188,531,513
Deferred financing costs, net		54,~~246~~915,~~064~~329			5,959,080
Intangible assets, net		~~121~~118,~~675~~196,~~551~~473			128,512,560
Other assets		~~370~~360,~~579~~966			417,378
Total noncurrent assets		~~338~~334,~~743~~454,~~850~~712			347,079,012
Total assets	$	~~365~~362,~~572~~429,~~409~~757		$	372,857,060
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable	$	7,~~165~~672,~~482~~418		$	6,459,301
Accrued compensation and related taxes		1,~~939~~767,~~105~~301			1,503,679
Customer deposits		~~923~~918,~~216~~670			964,022
Unearned revenue		1,~~765~~116,~~046~~307			1,332,484
Accrued interest		5523,~~638,361~~461			6,682,405
Other current liabilities		~~196~~86,~~799~~190			383,004
Current maturities of long-term debt		6,766,359			2,350,941
Current maturities of capital lease obligations		~~306~~267,~~107~~100			342,192
Total current liabilities		1819,~~700~~117,~~475~~806			20,018,028
Long-term debt, less current maturities		~~284~~285,~~705~~761,~~221~~389			282,693,343
Capital lease obligations, less current maturities		~~218~~171,~~156~~508			322,269
Deferred tax liabilities		25,~~999~~265,~~459~~751			27,294,034
Other long-term liabilities		3,137			—
Total liabilities		~~329~~330,~~626~~319,~~448~~591			330,327,674
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9)
Stockholders’ Equity
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 100 shares authorized, issued and outstanding		—			—
Additional paid-in capital (including warrants of $533,583 at September 13, 2009 and March 29, 2009)		194,579,776			194,579,776
Additional paid-in capital (including warrants of $533,583 at December 6, 2009 and March 29, 2009)		194,579,776			194,579,776
Accumulated deficit		(~~158~~162,~~595~~438,~~009~~936	)		(151,931,512	)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax		(3830,~~806~~674	)		(118,878	)
Total stockholders’ equity		3532,~~945~~110,~~961~~166			42,529,386
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	~~365~~362,~~572~~429,~~409~~757		$	372,857,060

See the accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

	Three Periods Ended
	September 13, 2009			September 14, 2008
	December 6, 2009			December 7, 2008
Sales	$	3533,~~572~~738,~~259~~158		$	4643,~~746~~476,~~442~~382
Cost of sales (exclusive of production depreciation and software amortization expense shown separately below)		2322,~~922~~683,~~929~~382			3130,~~492~~270,~~587~~543
Production depreciation and software amortization		1,~~321~~455,~~862~~058			1,~~193~~198,~~699~~280
Gross profit		109,~~327~~599,~~468~~718			1412,~~060~~007,~~156~~559
Selling, general and administrative expenses (exclusive of nonproduction depreciation and software amortization expense shown separately below)		45,~~717~~094,~~287~~381			4,~~724~~704,~~653~~072
Nonproduction depreciation and software amortization		~~464~~511,~~439~~236			~~419~~421,~~408~~017
Amortization of intangibles		3,~~492~~479,~~659~~078			3,~~995~~984,~~938~~276
Operating income		1,653,083			4,920,157
Impairment loss		—			85,352,000
Operating income (loss)		515,023			(82,453,806	)
Other income (expense)
Interest and dividend income		21,~~109~~437			2959,~~778~~592
Interest expense		(6,~~517~~457,~~587~~645	)		(6,~~699~~811,~~379~~533	)
Other (expense) income		(1,858	)		14,845
Other income		2,452			22,890
Total other expense		(6,~~517~~453,~~336~~756	)		(6,~~654~~729,~~756~~051	)
Loss before benefit from income taxes		(45,~~864~~938,~~253~~733	)		(189,~~734~~182,~~599~~857	)
Income tax benefit		(12,~~650~~094,~~405~~806	)		(~~617~~8,~~767~~413,650	)
Net loss	$	(3,~~213~~843,~~848~~927	)	$	(180,~~116~~769,~~832~~207	)

See the accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)

	Six Periods Ended
	Nine Periods Ended
	September 13, 2009			September 14, 2008
	December 6, 2009			December 7, 2008
Sales	$	71105,~~420~~159,~~909~~067		$	95138,~~196~~672,~~491~~873
Cost of sales (exclusive of production depreciation and software amortization expense shown separately below)		4871,~~389~~072,~~239~~621			6494,~~208~~478,~~310~~853
Production depreciation and software amortization		24,~~597~~052,~~880~~938			23,~~374~~572,~~634~~914
Gross profit		2030,~~433~~033,~~790~~508			2840,~~613~~621,~~547~~106
Selling, general and administrative expenses (exclusive of nonproduction depreciation and software amortization expense shown separately below)		914,~~456~~550,~~049~~430			1015,~~502~~206,~~741~~813
Nonproduction depreciation and software amortization		~~912~~1,~~769~~424,005			~~834~~1,~~331~~255,348
Amortization of intangibles		710,~~059~~538,~~111~~189			812,~~027~~011,~~340~~616
Operating income		3,005,861			9,249,135
Impairment loss		—			85,352,000
Operating income (loss)		3,520,884			(73,204,671	)
Other income (expense)
Interest and dividend income		1213,~~017~~454			88147,~~010~~602
Interest expense		(1319,~~273~~731,~~996~~641	)		(1320,~~369~~180,~~269~~802	)
Other income		1921,~~507~~959			6487,~~817~~707
Total other expense		(1319,~~242~~696,~~472~~228	)		(1319,~~216~~945,~~442~~493	)
Loss before benefit from income taxes		(1016,~~236~~175,~~611~~344	)		(393,~~967~~150,~~307~~164	)
Income tax benefit		(35,~~573~~667,~~114~~920	)		(19,~~284~~697,~~236~~886	)
Net loss	$	(610,~~663~~507,~~497~~424	)	$	(283,~~683~~452,~~071~~278	)

See the accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)

	Common Stock Shares Amount				Additional Paid-In Capital		Accumulated Deficit			Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income, net of tax			Total
Balance at March 29, 2009		100	$	—	$	194,579,776	$	(151,931,512	)	$	(118,878	)	$	42,529,386
Comprehensive loss:
Net loss		—		—		—		(610,~~663~~507,~~497~~424	)		—			(610,~~663~~507,~~497~~424	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax		—		—		—		—			8088,~~072~~204			8088,~~072~~204
Comprehensive loss														(610,~~583~~419,~~425~~220	)
Balance at September 13, 2009		100	$	—	$	194,579,776	$	(158,595,009	)	$	(38,806	)	$	35,945,961
Balance at December 6, 2009		100	$	—	$	194,579,776	$	(162,438,936	)	$	(30,674	)	$	32,110,166

See the accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

	Six Periods Ended
	Nine Periods Ended
	September 13, 2009			September 14, 2008
	December 6, 2009			December 7, 2008
Cash flows from operating activities
Net loss	$	(610,~~663~~507,~~497~~424	)	$	(283,~~683~~452,~~071~~278	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:
Deferred income taxes		(1,~~246~~922,~~801~~793	)		(210,~~624~~839,~~958~~587	)
Depreciation and amortization		1117,~~607~~464,~~060~~939			1218,~~076~~100,~~808~~632
Other non-cash adjustments		2,226,769			1,986,745
Impairment loss		—			85,352,000
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquired businesses		(1,342,667	)		(264,097	)
Other non-cash adjustments		3,398,282			3,024,538
Net cash provided by operating activities		4,580,864			8,491,427
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquired businesses		(7,388,755	)		(8,062,843	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		1,044,249			4,122,462
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of property, equipment and computer software		(23,~~620~~932,~~894~~107	)		(24,~~849~~257,~~410~~648	)
Payments for businesses acquired, net of cash		—(63,220	)		(1,336,499	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(23,~~620~~995,~~894~~327	)		(45,~~185~~594,~~909~~147	)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from revolving facility		612,000,000			—4,000,000
Payments on revolving facility		(6,000,000	)		—
Payments on term loan facility		(12,~~967~~159,~~761~~351	)		(5,~~343~~535,~~610~~200	)
Payments on capital leases		(~~184~~270,~~625~~280	)		(~~224~~324,~~888~~561	)
Payments of debt issuance costs		(~~145~~160,~~738~~737	)		—
Net cash used in financing activities		(2,298,124	)		(5,568,498	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		3,409,632			(1,859,761	)
Net decrease in cash		(338,154	)		(1,262,980	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash		458,554			(3,331,446	)
Cash at beginning of fiscal year		2,584,740			6,715,837
Cash at end of period	$	23,~~246~~043,~~586~~294		$	53,~~452~~384,~~857~~391
Supplemental disclosure
Payments for businesses acquired:
Fair value of assets acquired	$	—		$	—
Less liabilities assumed		—			—
Total purchase price		—			—
Deferred purchase price		—63,220			1,336,499
Cash paid for acquired businesses	$	—63,220		$	1,336,499
Noncash investing and financing activities
Assets acquired through capital lease	$	44,426		$	94101,~~976~~189

See the accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

1.	Organization and Basis of Presentation

Network Communications, Inc. (“NCI’’), and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, NCID, LLC and other entities and Network Publications Canada, Inc. (“NCI-Canada’’) (collectively “the Company’’) has its principal management, administrative and production facilities in Lawrenceville, GA. The Company is a publisher, producing The Real Estate Book (“TREB”), which is distributed in over 375 markets, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, and Canada. It also produces the Apartment Finder, New Home Finder, Mature Living Choices, Unique Homes Magazine, Black’s Guide, Kansas City Homes and Gardens, New England Home, Home by Design, Homes and Lifestyles magazines, regional home improvement magazines, and other publications. The Company also provides its customers the opportunity to purchase related marketing services, such as custom publishing and direct mail marketing. Revenue is primarily generated from advertising displayed in the Company’s print publications and online versions of such publications. The combined online and print distribution provide a unique advantage in reaching real estate and home design consumers. Advertisers may also purchase enhanced print or online listings for an additional fee. Each market is operated either by an Independent Distributor (“ID”) assigned a particular market or by the Company. NCI is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Gallarus Media Holdings, Inc. (“GMH’’), and effective January 7, 2005, a wholly-owned subsidiary of our ultimate parent, GMH Holding Company (“GMHC’’). On January 7, 2005, the majority of GMHC stock was acquired by Citigroup Venture Capital Equity Partners, L.P. and its affiliated funds (“CVC Fund”). As a result of their stock acquisition of GMHC, CVC Fund owns approximately 8971% of GMHC’s outstanding capital stock. By virtue of their stock ownership, CVC Fund has significant influence over our management and will be able to determine the outcome of all matters required to be submitted to the stockholders for approval. CVC subsequently spun off from its former owner, Citigroup, and the new entity was renamed Court Square Capital Partners (“Court Square”).

2.	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying financial statements represent the condensed consolidated statements of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. The Company reports on a 52-53 week accounting year which ends on the last Sunday of March of that year and includes 13 four-week periods. Fiscal quarters 1, 2 and 3 each include 12 weeks; fiscal quarter 4 includes 16 or 17 weeks. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of the Company for the three periods and ~~six~~nine periods ended ~~September~~December 136, 2009 and the three periods and ~~six~~nine periods ended ~~September~~December 147, 2008. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying interim condensed consolidated financial statements for the three periods and ~~six~~nine periods ended ~~September~~December 136, 2009 and the three periods and ~~six~~nine periods ended ~~September~~December 147, 2008 are unaudited. Certain information ~~and~~ and note disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for financial information have been condensed or omitted pursuant to the rules and regulations of Article 10 of SEC Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, these condensed consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to state fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods indicated. Operating results for the three periods and ~~six~~nine periods ended ~~September~~December 136, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any other future interim period or for the fiscal year ending March 28, 2010. You should read the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2009 filed with the SEC on June 19, 2009.

Table of Contents

NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair values of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities at ~~September~~December 136, 2009 ~~and~~ and March 29, 2009, equal the carrying values reported on the ~~Consolidated~~consolidated balance ~~Balance~~sheets ~~Sheets~~ except for the new senior secured term loan facility entered into on July 20, 2007 (the “new term loan facility”), the10 ¾% senior notes (“senior notes”) and the senior subordinated note. The fair values of the new term loan facility and senior notes are based on quoted market values. The fair value of the new term loan facility was $4845.19 million and $42.4 million as compared to the carrying values of $68.76 million and $70.7 million as of ~~September~~ 13December 6, 2009 and March 29, 2009, respectively. The fair value of the senior notes was $3470.8 2 million and $24.7 million as compared to the carrying amounts of $175.0 million and $175.0 million as of ~~September 13~~December 6, 2009 and March 29, 2009, respectively. The senior subordinated note does not trade in a market so the fair value is based on appropriate valuation methodologies including option model and liquidation analyses. The fair value of the senior subordinated note was $6.0 million and $6.0 million as compared to the carrying amounts of $4344.23 million and $40.9 million as of December ~~September 13~~6, 2009 and March 29, 2009, respectively.

Derivative Instruments

~~Statement~~The ofCompany ~~Financial~~has ~~Accounting~~adopted ~~Standard~~the ~~(“SFAS”) No. 133,~~authoritative ~~Accounting~~guidance for ~~Derivative Instruments~~derivative instruments and hedging ~~Hedging~~activities ~~Activities~~which ~~(“SFAS 133”),~~ establishes accounting and reporting standards for derivative instruments, including certain derivative instruments embedded in other contracts and for hedging activities. This ~~statement~~ guidance requires the recognition of all derivative instruments as either assets or liabilities in the balance sheet measured at fair value. The changes in fair value of derivative instruments are recognized as gains or losses in the period of change. ~~SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative~~The ~~Instruments and Hedging Activities”~~guidance, which was effective for the Company in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009, requires enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for ~~under SFAS 133 and its related interpretations~~, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged ~~items~~ items affect an entity's financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.

Occasionally, the Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts whereby the Company agrees to sell on a certain date Canadian Dollars in exchange of US Dollars at a pre-determined foreign exchange rate. The Company has not elected to use hedge accounting to record these contracts. The Company executes the contract on or prior to the expiry date and the related gain or loss is recorded in its statement of operations under the selling, general and administrative expenses during the period the contract is executed. The Company uses these contracts to minimize the foreign currency fluctuation risk resulting from activities of its subsidiary, ~~Network Publications Canada, Inc (~~NCI-Canada). At ~~September~~December 136, 2009, the Company had ~~two~~four forward contracts outstanding consisting of CAD $0.220 million, CAD $0.30 million, CAD $0.45 million and CAD $0.545 million expiring on ~~October~~December 131, 2009, ~~and~~March 1, ~~December 31~~2010, ~~2009~~ June 1, 2010, and September 1, 2010, respectively. At March 29, 2009, the Company had one forward contract outstanding of CAD $0.330 million expiring on July 1, 2009. In addition, the Company recorded a loss of US $0.~~06 million~~08 million versus a gain of US $0.0203 million related to foreign currency forward ~~contracts~~ contracts executed during the ~~six~~nine periods ending ~~September~~December 136, 2009 and ~~September 14,~~December 7, 2008, respectively in its statements of operations for the periods indicated under the selling, general and administrative expenses line.

Subsequent events

In ~~the~~ the first quarter of fiscal year 2010, the Company adopted the provisions of the ~~SFAS~~authoritative ~~165,~~guidance ~~“Subsequent Events”~~for subsequent events, which require entities to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been evaluated, as well as whether that date is the date the financial statements were issued or the date the financial statements were available to be issued. Accordingly, the Company evaluated, for potential recognition and disclosure, events that occurred prior to the filing of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the ~~six~~quarterly ~~periods~~period ended ~~September~~December 136, 2009 onthrough ~~October~~January 2615, ~~2009~~2010, the date the financial statements were issued.

Table of Contents

NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In ~~May~~April 2009, ~~The~~the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ~~SFAS~~a ~~No.~~staff ~~165,~~position ~~Subsequent~~which ~~Events (“SFAS~~increases ~~165”). This~~the ~~statement~~frequency ~~establishes general standards~~ of ~~accounting~~the ~~for and~~ disclosures of ~~events~~related ~~that~~to ~~occur after~~ the ~~balance~~fair ~~sheet~~value ~~date but before financial~~of ~~statements~~financial ~~are~~instruments ~~issued~~required orby ~~are~~public ~~available~~entities to bea ~~issued. It~~quarterly ~~requires~~basis ~~the~~rather ~~disclosure~~than ofjust ~~the~~annually. ~~date~~The ~~through~~quarterly ~~which~~disclosures anare ~~entity~~intended ~~has~~to ~~evaluated~~provide ~~subsequent events~~financial ~~and~~statement ~~whether~~users ~~that~~with ~~evaluation~~more ~~date~~timely isinformation about the ~~date~~effects of ~~issuance~~current ormarket conditions ~~the~~on ~~date~~an ~~the~~ entity’s financial ~~statements~~instruments ~~were~~that ~~available~~are tonot beotherwise ~~issued~~reported at fair value. The ~~SFAS~~staff ~~165~~position is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, ~~and~~with asearly ~~such,~~adoption ~~the~~permitted in certain circumstances for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company adopted ~~this~~the staff ~~standard~~position in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and the adoption had no impact on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In April ~~2009~~2008, the FASB issued ~~FASB~~a staff position ~~(“FSP”)~~which ~~FAS~~amended ~~107-1,~~the ~~“Disclosures~~factors ~~about~~an ~~Fair Value of~~entity ~~Financial~~should ~~Instruments”~~consider ~~(“FSP~~in ~~107-1”).~~developing ~~The~~renewal ~~staff~~or ~~position~~extension ~~increases~~assumptions ~~the~~used in ~~frequency~~determining of the ~~disclosures~~useful ~~related~~life toof ~~the~~recognized ~~fair~~intangible ~~value~~assets ofunder ~~financial instruments~~the ~~required~~authoritative byguidance ~~public~~for ~~entities~~goodwill toand aother ~~quarterly~~intangible ~~basis rather than just annually~~assets. The new ~~quarterly~~guidance ~~disclosures~~applies ~~are~~prospectively ~~intended~~ to ~~provide~~intangible ~~financial~~assets ~~statement~~that ~~users~~are ~~with~~acquired ~~more~~individually ~~timely~~or ~~information~~with ~~about~~a ~~the~~group ~~effects~~ of ~~current~~other ~~market~~assets ~~conditions~~in onbusiness ~~an entity’s~~combinations ~~financial~~and ~~instruments that are not otherwise reported at fair value.~~asset ~~FSP~~acquisitions ~~107-1~~and is effective for ~~interim~~financial ~~and~~statements ~~annual~~issued ~~periods~~for ~~ending~~fiscal ~~after June 15,~~years ~~2009,~~and ~~with~~interim ~~early adoption permitted in certain circumstances for~~ periods ~~ending~~ beginning after ~~March~~December 15, ~~2009~~2008. The Company adopted ~~FSP~~the ~~107-1~~staff position in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and the adoption had no material impact on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In ~~April~~ ~~2008~~December 2007, the FASB issued ~~FSP~~the ~~FAS~~authoritative ~~142-3,~~guidance ~~Determination~~for noncontrolling ofinterests ~~the~~in ~~Useful~~consolidated ~~Life~~financial ofstatements. The ~~Intangible~~guidance ~~Assets~~establishes ~~(“FSP~~accounting ~~142-3”).~~and ~~FSP~~reporting ~~142-3~~standards ~~amends~~for the ~~factors an entity~~noncontrolling ~~should~~interest ~~consider~~ in ~~developing~~a ~~renewal~~subsidiary orand ~~extension~~for ~~assumptions used in determining~~ the ~~useful~~deconsolidation ~~life~~ of ~~recognized~~a ~~intangible~~subsidiary. ~~assets~~It ~~under SFAS 142,~~also ~~“Goodwill~~clarifies ~~and~~that ~~Other~~a ~~Intangible Assets”.~~noncontrolling ~~The~~interest ~~new~~in ~~guidance~~a ~~applies~~subsidiary ~~prospectively~~is toan ~~intangible assets that~~ownership ~~are~~interest ~~acquired~~in ~~individually~~the orconsolidated ~~with~~entity athat ~~group~~should ofbe ~~other~~reported ~~assets~~as equity in ~~business~~the ~~combinations~~consolidated ~~and~~financial ~~asset acquisitions~~statements. The ~~FSP~~guidance ~~142-3~~ is effective for ~~financial~~ ~~statements issued for~~ fiscal years ~~and~~beginning ~~interim~~on ~~periods~~or ~~beginning~~ after December 15, 2008~~. Early~~ ~~adoption~~and isas ~~prohibited. The~~such, ~~Company~~the Company adopted ~~FSP~~this ~~142-3~~standard in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and the adoption had no ~~material~~ impact on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In ~~March 2008~~December 2007, the FASB issued ~~SFAS~~the ~~No.~~authoritative ~~161,~~guidance ~~“Disclosures~~for ~~about Derivative~~business ~~Instruments~~combinations ~~and~~which ~~Hedging~~changed ~~Activities”~~significantly ~~(“SFAS~~the ~~161”),~~accounting ~~which~~for ~~amends the~~business ~~disclosure~~combinations ~~requirements~~in ofa ~~SFAS~~number ~~133~~of ~~“Accounting~~areas ~~for~~including ~~Derivative Instruments~~the ~~and~~treatment ~~Hedging~~of ~~Activities”.~~contingent consideration, ~~SFAS~~contingencies, ~~161~~acquisition ~~provides~~costs, anIPR&D ~~enhanced~~and restructuring ~~understanding~~costs. ~~about~~In ~~how~~addition, ~~and~~under ~~why~~the ~~derivative~~guidance, ~~instruments~~changes ~~are~~in ~~used,~~deferred ~~how~~tax ~~they~~asset ~~are~~valuation ~~accounted~~allowances ~~for~~ and ~~their~~acquired ~~effect~~income ontax anuncertainties ~~entity’s~~in ~~financial~~a ~~position,~~business ~~performance~~combination after ~~and~~the ~~cash~~measurement ~~flows.~~period ~~SFAS~~will ~~161,~~impact ~~which~~income istaxes. The guidance is effective for ~~the~~fiscal ~~first~~years ~~interim period~~ beginning after ~~November~~December 15, 2008 and, ~~requires~~as ~~additional disclosure in future~~such, ~~filings.~~the ~~The~~ Company adopted this standard in the ~~fourth~~first quarter of fiscal year ~~2009~~ ~~and~~2010. ~~the~~The provisions ~~adoption~~are ~~did~~effective ~~not~~for ~~have~~the ~~any~~Company ~~material~~for ~~impact~~business combinations on ~~its~~or ~~financial~~after ~~position,~~March ~~results of operations~~30, ~~or cash flows~~2009.

In ~~December 2007~~September 2006, the FASB issued ~~SFAS~~the ~~No. 160,~~authoritative ~~“Noncontrolling~~guidance ~~Interests~~for ~~in Consolidated~~fair ~~Financial Statements — an Amendment of ARB No. 51~~value ~~(“SFAS~~measurements ~~160”).~~which ~~SFAS~~defines ~~160~~fair ~~amends~~value, ~~ARB~~establishes ~~No. 51~~a toframework ~~establish~~for ~~accounting and~~measuring ~~reporting~~fair ~~standards~~value ~~for~~under ~~the~~generally ~~noncontrolling~~accepted ~~interest~~accounting inprinciples, ~~a subsidiary~~ and ~~for the~~expands ~~deconsolidation~~disclosures ofabout afair ~~subsidiary~~value measurements. ~~SFAS~~The ~~160~~guidance ~~also~~emphasizes ~~clarifies~~ that ~~a noncontrolling~~fair ~~interest~~value inis a ~~subsidiary~~market-based ismeasurement, not an ~~ownership~~entity-specific ~~interest~~measurement, ~~in the consolidated entity~~and states that ~~should~~a befair ~~reported~~value asmeasurement ~~equity~~should inbe ~~the~~determined ~~consolidated~~based ~~financial statements. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning~~ on ~~or after December 15, 2008~~the ~~and~~assumptions asthat ~~such,~~market ~~the~~participants ~~Company~~would ~~adopted~~use ~~this standard~~ in pricing the ~~first~~asset ~~quarter of fiscal~~or ~~year~~liability. The ~~2010~~guidance ~~and~~applies ~~the~~under ~~adoption~~other ~~did~~accounting ~~not have any material impact on its financial~~pronouncements ~~position,~~that ~~results~~require ofor ~~operations,~~permit orfair ~~cash~~value ~~flows~~measurements.

InThe ~~December 2007~~guidance, ~~the~~among ~~FASB~~other ~~issued~~things, ~~SFAS~~requires ~~No.~~companies ~~141~~to ~~(revised~~maximize ~~2007),~~the ~~Business~~use ~~Combinations~~of ~~(“SFAS 141R”).~~observable ~~SFAS~~inputs ~~141R~~and ~~will~~minimize ~~significantly change~~ the ~~accounting for~~use ~~business combinations in a number~~ of ~~areas~~unobservable ~~including~~inputs ~~the~~when ~~treatment of~~measuring ~~contingent~~fair ~~consideration~~value, ~~contingencies, acquisition costs, IPR&D~~ and ~~restructuring~~ ~~costs.~~specifies Ina ~~addition,~~hierarchy ~~under~~of ~~SFAS 141R, changes in deferred tax asset~~ valuation ~~allowances~~techniques ~~and~~based ~~acquired~~on ~~income tax uncertainties in a business~~whether ~~combination after~~ the ~~measurement~~inputs ~~period~~to ~~will~~those ~~impact~~valuation ~~income taxes. SFAS 141R~~techniques isare ~~effective~~observable ~~for~~or ~~fiscal years beginning after~~unobservable. ~~December 15,~~Observable ~~2008~~inputs ~~and,~~reflect asmarket ~~such,~~data ~~the~~obtained ~~Company~~from ~~adopted~~independent ~~this~~sources, ~~standard in the~~while ~~first~~unobservable ~~quarter~~inputs ofreflect ~~fiscal~~the ~~year~~company’s ~~2010~~market assumptions. The ~~provisions are~~ effective ~~for the Company~~date is for ~~business~~fiscal ~~combinations~~years onbeginning or after ~~March~~November 3015, ~~2009~~2007.

The fair value measurement guidance establishes a three-tiered hierarchy to prioritize inputs used to measure fair value. Those tiers are defined as follows:

-	Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Table of Contents

NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Effective March 26, 2007, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an Interpretation of FASB Statement 109 (“FIN 48”). FIN 48 requires that a position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return be recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not (i.e. a likelihood of more than fifty percent) that the position would be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. A recognized tax position is then measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlements. Upon adoption, the Company did not have any material uncertain tax positions to account for as an adjustment to its opening balance of retained earnings on March 26, 2007. In addition, as of September 13, 2009 and March 29, 2009, the Company did not have any material unrecognized tax benefits.

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115” (“SFAS 159”). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. This provides entities with the opportunity to mitigate volatility in reported earnings caused by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without being required to apply complex hedge accounting provisions. The provisions of SFAS 159 are effective as of the beginning of fiscal years that start after November 15, 2007. The Company adopted SFAS 159 on March 31, 2008 and the adoption did not have any material impact on its financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement, and states that a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. SFAS 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.

SFAS 157, among other things, requires companies to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value, and specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the company’s market assumptions. The effective date is for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.

SFAS 157 establishes a three-tiered hierarchy to prioritize inputs used to measure fair value. Those tiers are defined as follows:

- Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 inputs are inputs, other than quoted prices included within Level 1, that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, a Level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

-	Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

The highest priority in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value is placed on the use of Level 1 inputs, while the lowest priority is placed on the use of Level 3 inputs.

This ~~statement~~guidance also expands the related disclosure requirements in an effort to provide greater transparency around fair value measures.

At March 31, 2008, the Company adopted ~~SFAS~~the ~~157~~guidance, and the adoption had no material ~~impact~~ impact on the Company’s financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In February 2008, the FASB ~~issued~~amended ~~FSP~~the ~~FAS~~guidance ~~157-2,~~to ~~which~~delay ~~delays~~its ~~the~~ effective date ~~of SFAS 157~~ to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years, for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the ~~financial~~ financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The ~~Company~~ Company adopted ~~FSP~~the ~~FAS~~amendment ~~157-2~~ in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and the ~~adoption~~ adoption had no material impact on its financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

3.	Inventories

At December 6, 2009 and March 29, 2009, inventories consisted of the following:

	December 6, 2009		March 29, 2009

Distribution products and marketing aids for resale	$	280,257	$	274,683
Production, paper and ink		1,249,859		2,057,004
Work-in-process		432,560		518,230
Total	$	1,962,676	$	2,849,917

4.	Acquisitions

Generally, whenever an acquisition is completed, the Company pays a premium over the fair value of the net tangible and identified intangible assets acquired to fulfill the Company’s strategic initiatives and to ensure strategic fit with its current publications. The majority of the Company’s transactions are asset based in which the Company acquires the publishing assets associated with the products purchased that fit its predetermined criteria as an expansion of the Company’s geographical footprint, addition to market share in certain areas or complementary services to its existing customers. The Company evaluates each asset purchased on an individual basis for fit with its organization based on the historical performance of the asset along with the Company’s expectations for growth. The strength of each criteria and the expected return on investment are evaluated in developing the purchase price.

Allocation of Purchase Price

The application of purchase accounting under the authoritative guidance for business combinations requires that the total purchase price be allocated to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values at the acquisition date. The allocation process requires an analysis of acquired contracts, customer relationships, contractual commitments and legal contingencies to identify and record the fair value of all assets acquired and liabilities assumed. In valuing acquired assets and assumed liabilities, fair values are based on, but not limited to: future expected cash flows; current replacement cost for similar capacity for certain fixed assets; market rate assumptions for contractual obligations; settlement plans for litigation and contingencies; and appropriate discount rates and growth rates. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets of the acquired business. Goodwill, which is tax deductible, resulting from the acquisitions is assigned to the Company’s one business segment. The Company adopted the guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and will apply the provisions on acquisitions completed in the future.

Table of Contents

NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

3On September 30, 2009, the Company paid $0.06 ~~Inventories~~million for earn-outs related to the acquisition of the publishing assets of DGP Apartment Publications of Louisiana completed on August 30, 2007. The earn-out payment was charged to goodwill and shown under supplemental disclosure in the consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine periods ended December 6, 2009. In addition, the Company did not complete any acquisitions in the third quarter ended December 6, 2009.

~~At September~~On ~~13,~~May 1, 2009, ~~and~~the ~~March~~Company ~~29,~~acquired ~~2009,~~the ~~inventories~~publishing ~~consisted~~assets of The Real Estate Book in the ~~following:~~Mid-Atlantic region for which consideration did not involve cash. The total purchase price was $0.4 million of which $0.2 million was recorded to goodwill.

	September 13, 2009		March 29, 2009
Distribution products and marketing aids for resale	$	239,371	$	274,683
Production, paper and ink		1,155,101		2,057,004
Work-in-process		617,003		518,230
Total	$	2,011,475	$	2,849,917

On July 29, 2008, the Company paid $1.3 million for earn-outs related to the New England Home acquisition completed on March 28, 2007. The earn-out payment was charged to goodwill and shown under supplemental disclosure in the consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine periods ended December 7, 2008.

4. Acquisitions

Generally, whenever an acquisition is completed, the Company pays a premium over the fair value of the net tangible and identified intangible assets acquired to fulfill the Company’s strategic initiatives and to ensure strategic fit with its current publications. The majority of the Company’s transactions are asset based in which the Company acquires the publishing assets associated with the products purchased that fit our predetermined criteria as an expansion of our geographical footprint, addition to market share in certain areas or complementary services to our existing customers. The Company evaluates each asset purchased on an individual basis for fit with our organization based on its historical performance along with our expectations for growth. The strength of each criteria and the expected return on our investment are evaluated in developing the purchase price.

Allocation of Purchase Price

The application of purchase accounting under SFAS 141 requires that the total purchase price be allocated to the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their fair values at the acquisition date. The allocation process requires an analysis of acquired contracts, customer relationships, contractual commitments and legal contingencies to identify and record the fair value of all assets acquired and liabilities assumed. In valuing acquired assets and assumed liabilities, fair values are based on, but not limited to: future expected cash flows; current replacement cost for similar capacity for certain fixed assets; market rate assumptions for contractual obligations; settlement plans for litigation and contingencies; and appropriate discount rates and growth rates. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net assets of the acquired business. Goodwill, which is tax deductible, resulting from the acquisitions is assigned to the Company’s one business segment. The Company adopted SFAS 141R in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and will apply the provisions on acquisitions completed in the future.

On May 1, 2009, the Company acquired the publishing assets of The Real Estate Book in the Mid-Atlantic region for which consideration did not involve cash. The total purchase price was $0.4 million of which $0.2 million was recorded to goodwill. In addition, the Company did not complete any acquisitions in the second quarter ended September 13, 2009.

Goodwill

AsThe total ~~disclosed~~amounts inof ~~its~~goodwill ~~Annual Report~~ on ~~Form 10-K filed with~~ the ~~SEC~~Company’s onbooks ~~June~~at ~~19,~~December ~~2009~~6, ~~the~~ ~~Company had a triggering event under SFAS 142 in the third quarter of fiscal year~~ 2009~~. As~~ ~~a result, the Company performed an impairment test of its goodwill~~ and ~~indefinite-lived~~March ~~intangible assets under SFAS 142 and recorded~~29, ~~during~~2009 ~~the~~were ~~third~~$188.8 million and ~~fourth quarters of fiscal year 2009 a total impairment loss of~~ $~~119~~188.5 million~~. For further details~~, ~~refer to the Company’s Annual Report on~~ ~~Form 10-K for fiscal year 2009 filed with the SEC on June 19, 2009~~respectively. ~~In addition, the Company does not believe that a triggering event has occurred during the six periods ended September 13, 2009.~~

	December 6, 2009			March 29, 2009
Gross cost of goodwill, beginning of fiscal year	$	308,053,546		$	306,518,991
Additions		295,161			1,534,555
Total gross cost of goodwill, end of period		308,348,707			308,053,546
Accumulated impairment losses		(119,522,033	)		(119,522,033	)
Balance, end of period	$	188,826,674		$	188,531,513

As a result of continued declines in the Company’s consolidated operating income during the first, second and third quarters of fiscal year 2009 in the Company’s only reportable segment, the publishing segment, in addition to the fair market value during that period of its outstanding debt, the Company determined that it had a triggering event under the authoritative guidance for goodwill and performed, as of December 7, 2008, an assessment of goodwill for impairment on all of the Company’s reporting units using the discounted cash flow approach. The discounted cash flow approach was the same approach used in fiscal year 2008. The discount rate was adjusted from 11.7% in the analysis performed in fiscal year 2008 to 12.5% in the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 analysis. These assumptions were based on the economic environment and credit market conditions during the fiscal year 2009. The Company’s reporting units are the Resale and New Sales unit, the Rental and Leasing unit and the Remodeling and Home Improvement unit.

Based on the results of the Company’s assessment of goodwill for impairment, it was determined that the carrying values of the Resale and New Sales unit and the Remodeling and Home Improvement unit exceeded their estimated fair value. As a result, the Company initiated step two of the analysis for the Resale and New Sales and the Remodeling and Home Improvement units. Also, the Company determined that the carrying value of the Rental and Leasing unit did not exceed its estimated fair value. As a result, no further testing was required and no impairment of goodwill was identified for the Rental and Leasing unit. As of December 7, 2008, the carrying amounts of goodwill associated with the Resale and New Sales unit, the Rental and Leasing unit and the Remodeling and Home Improvement unit were $194.6 million, $94.5 million and $18.7 million, respectively. The second step was not completed in the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 and as a result, the Company recorded an estimated noncash impairment charge based on a preliminary assessment in the amount of $85.4 million in the Company’s statements of operations for the three periods and nine periods ended December 7, 2008. The amounts of the estimated recorded impairment charges for the Resale and New Sales unit and the Remodeling and Home Improvement unit were $74.0 million and $11.4 million, respectively. Step two was completed in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009 and resulted in an additional $34.1 million recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009. The impairment loss related primarily to the deteriorating global economic conditions and the downturn in the resale and new home markets. A change in the economic conditions or other circumstances influencing the estimate of future cash flows or fair value could result in future impairment charges of goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite lives.

Table of Contents

NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

~~The~~As ~~total~~of ~~amounts~~December 7, of2008, ~~goodwill~~the onCompany ~~the~~had one intangible asset with an indefinite life. The Company’s ~~books~~determined atthat ~~September~~this ~~13,~~asset ~~2009~~which ~~and~~is ~~March~~a ~~29, 2009~~trademark ~~were~~was ~~$188.8 million~~not impaired ~~and~~as ~~$188.5~~of December ~~million~~7, ~~respectively~~ 2008.

Balance, March 30, 2008	$	306,518,991
Fiscal year 2009 additions		1,534,555
Impairment loss		(119,522,033	)
Balance, March 29, 2009		188,531,513
Current year additions		226,640
Balance, September 13, 2009	$	188,758,153

The Company does not believe that a triggering event has occurred during the nine periods ended December 6, 2009.

6.	Comprehensive Loss

Comprehensive loss includes reported net loss, and foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax. The following table shows NCI’s comprehensive loss for the three periods and ~~six~~nine periods ended ~~September~~December 136, 2009 and ~~September~~December 147, 2008:

	Three Periods Ended						~~Six~~Nine Periods Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	~~September~~December 136, 2009			~~September~~December 147, 2008			~~September~~December 136, 2009			~~September~~December 147, 2008
Net loss	$	(3,~~214~~844	)	$	(180,~~117~~769	)	$	(610,~~663~~507	)	$	(283,~~683~~452	)
Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax		228			(18129	)		8088			(21150	)
Comprehensive loss	$	(3,~~192~~836	)	$	(180,~~135~~898	)	$	(610,~~583~~419	)	$	(283,~~704~~602	)

7.	Income Taxes

The following table sets forth the income tax benefit and effective tax rate for the three periods and ~~six~~nine periods ended ~~September~~December 136, 2009 and ~~September~~December 147, 2008:

	Three Periods Ended						~~Six~~Nine Periods Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	~~September~~December 136, 2009			~~September~~December 147, 2008			~~September~~December 136, 2009			~~September~~December 147, 2008
Income tax benefit	$	(12,~~650~~095	)	$	(~~618~~8,414	)	$	(35,~~573~~668	)	$	(19,~~284~~698	)
Effective tax rate		3335.93	%		359.64	%		3435.90	%		3210.4	%

Income tax benefit consists of current and deferred income taxes. The difference in effective income tax rates is due primarily to the impact of nondeductible expenses relative to the level of net loss before taxes between the two periods partially offset by the noncash goodwill impairment charge, which was recorded in the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 pursuant to the Company’s performance of step one of the goodwill assessment for impairment as a result of the continued declines in the Company’s consolidated operating income during the first three quarters of fiscal year 2009. Also, the Company has nondeductible expenses related to meals and entertainment and certain interest expenses related to its senior ~~subordinated~~ subordinated debt. The Company is subject to taxation in the United States of America (for federal and state) and Canada.

8.	Long-term Debt

At December 6, 2009 and March 29, 2009, long-term debt consisted of the following:

	December 6, 2009			March 29, 2009

10 ¾% Senior Notes, due December 1, 2013	$	175,000,000		$	175,000,000
New Senior Term loan facility, due November 30, 2012		68,558,172			70,717,523
New Revolving loan facility, due November 30, 2010		6,000,000			—
Senior Subordinated Note, due June 30, 2013		44,335,488			40,937,992
Total long-term debt		293,893,660			286,655,515
Less:
Unamortized discount on Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Note		(1,365,912	)		(1,611,231	)
Current maturities		(6,766,359	)		(2,350,941	)
Long-term debt, less current maturities	$	285,761,389		$	282,693,343

Table of Contents

NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

8For a discussion of certain of our debt characteristics, see “Note 13. Long-~~Term~~ term Debt” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements section of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2009. Other than the items noted below, there have been no significant developments since March 29, 2009.

At September 13, 2009 and March 29, 2009, long-term debt consisted of the following:

	September 13, 2009			March 29, 2009
10 ¾% Senior Notes, due December 1, 2013	$	175,000,000		$	175,000,000
New Senior Term loan facility, due November 30, 2012		68,749,762			70,717,523
Senior Subordinated Note, due June 30, 2013		43,169,503			40,937,992
Total long-term debt		286,919,265			286,655,515
Less:
Unamortized discount on Senior Notes and Senior Subordinated Note		(1,447,685	)		(1,611,231	)
Current maturities		(766,359	)		(2,350,941	)
Long-term debt, less current maturities	$	284,705,221		$	282,693,343

For a discussion of certain of our debt characteristics, see “Note 13. Long-term Debt” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements section of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2009. Other than the items noted below, there have been no significant developments since March 29, 2009.

New Senior Credit Facility

On July 20, 2007, the Company entered into a new term loan facility for an aggregate principal amount of $76.6 million (“the new term loan facility”) and a senior secured revolving loan facility (the “new revolving loan facility”) for an amount up to $35.0 million (the new term loan facility together with the new revolving loan facility; the “new credit facility”). The proceeds of the new credit facility were used to repay all amounts outstanding under the Company’s prior credit facility (dated as of November 30, 2005) and fund acquisitions during the Company’s ~~second~~third quarter of fiscal year 2008. In connection with the new credit facility, the Company recorded $0.5 million of deferred charges during the ~~second~~third quarter of fiscal year 2008 for transaction fees and other related debt issuance costs. Additionally, approximately $3.7 million of debt issuance costs associated with the extinguishment of the existing term loan facility were written off and charged to interest expense during the ~~second~~third quarter of fiscal year 2008.

On June 10, 2008, the Company amended the new revolving loan facility dated July 20, 2007. The amendment adjusted the interest coverage ratios over the term of the new revolving loan facility.

On December 4, 2008, the Company amended the new revolving loan facility dated July 20, 2007. The amendment adjusted the amount payable to employees and other individuals in connection with the repurchase of equity interests held by such individuals or upon the termination of employment of an individual in connection with the repurchase of stock appreciation rights or other similar interests, adjusted the interest coverage ratio and the senior secured leverage ratio and eliminated the Company’s ability to carry forward any unused permitted investments in respect of unrestricted subsidiaries.

On May 4, 2009, the Company amended the new revolving loan facility dated July 20, 2007 (the “amended revolving loan facility”). The amendment restated the applicable percentage as defined in the revolving credit agreement, increased the commitment fee from 0.50% to 0.75%, decreased the revolving credit commitment from $35.0 million to $15.0 million, decreased the permitted annual capital expenditures from $10.0 million to $6.0 million, and adjusted the interest coverage ratio and the senior secured coverage ratio on the revolving facility. In connection with the amendment, the Company wrote off $0.2 million for debt issuance costs associated with the prior revolving facility dated July 20, 2007 and recorded $0.2 million for debt issuance costs associated with the new amended facility, ofin ~~which~~the ~~$0.1~~first ~~million~~quarter ~~was paid as~~ of ~~September~~ ~~13,~~fiscal ~~2009~~year 2010.

Under the new credit facility, the Company has the option to borrow funds at an interest rate equal to the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a margin or at the lender’s base rate (which approximates the Prime rate) plus a margin. Interest rates under the new term loan facility are base rate plus a margin of 1.00% or LIBOR plus a margin of 2.00%. Interest rates under the new revolving loan facility are base rate plus a margin ranging from 2.50% to 1.75% or LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 3.50% to 2.75%. The applicable margin payable on the amended revolving loan facility is subject to adjustments based upon a leverage-based pricing grid. The new credit facility requires the Company to meet maximum leverage ratios and minimum interest coverage ratios and includes a maximum annual capital expenditures limitation. In addition, the new credit facility contains certain restrictive covenants which, among other things, limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends, incur liens, prepay subordinated debt, make loans and investments, merge or consolidate, sell assets, change our business, amend the terms of our subordinated debt and engage in certain other activities customarily restricted in such agreements. It also contains certain customary events of defaults, subject to grace periods, as appropriate.

The new revolving facility contains a cross default provision to other indebtedness in excess of $5.0 million whereby payment defaults on such other indebtedness result in cross default under the new revolving facility. Covenant defaults under such other indebtedness do not result in a cross default under the new revolving facility until expiration of any relevant grace periods as set forth under such other indebtedness.

Table of Contents

NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

~~Under~~The ~~the~~ new ~~credit facility, the Company has the option to borrow funds at an interest~~ ~~rate equal to the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a margin or at the lender’s base rate (which approximates the Prime rate) plus a margin. Interest rates under the new~~ term loan facility ~~are~~contains ~~base rate plus~~ a ~~margin~~cross ~~of 1.0%~~default orprovision ~~LIBOR~~to ~~plus~~other aindebtedness ~~margin~~in excess of 2$7.~~00%.~~5 ~~Interest~~million ~~rates~~whereby ~~under~~payment ~~the~~defaults ~~new revolving loan facility are base rate plus a margin ranging from 2.50% to 1.75%~~ or ~~LIBOR plus~~covenant adefaults ~~margin ranging from 3.50% to 2.75%. The applicable margin payable~~ on ~~the~~such ~~amended~~other ~~revolving~~indebtedness ~~loan~~are, ~~facility is~~ subject to adjustments based upon a leverage-based pricing grid. The new credit facility requires the Company to meet maximum leverage ratios and minimum interest coverage ratios and includes a maximum annual capital expenditures limitation. In addition, the new credit facility contains certain ~~restrictive covenants which~~exceptions, ~~among~~ ~~other~~cure ~~things,~~periods ~~limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends, incur liens, prepay subordinated debt, make loans~~ and ~~investments,~~grace ~~merge~~periods oras ~~consolidate,~~set ~~sell~~forth ~~assets,~~in ~~change our business, amend~~ the ~~terms~~new ofterm ~~our subordinated~~loan ~~debt~~facility ~~and engage in certain other activities customarily restricted in such agreements~~agreement. ~~It also contains certain customary events of defaults, subject to grace periods, as appropriate.~~

The new term loan facility contains a cross default provision to other indebtedness in excess of $7.5 million whereby payment defaults or covenant defaults on such other indebtedness are, subject to certain exceptions, cure periods and grace periods as set forth in the new term loan facility agreement, cross defaults under the new term loan facility.

The new credit facility is collateralized by substantially all of the assets of NCI and its subsidiaries. In addition, NCI’s subsidiaries are joint and several guarantors of the obligations. The new credit facility loan agreements contain certain restrictive provisions which include, but are not limited to, requiring the Company to maintain certain financial ratios and limits upon the Company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness, make certain acquisitions or investments, sell assets or make other restricted payments, including dividends (as defined in the new term loan credit facility agreement).

The Company’s new credit facility contains a subjective acceleration clause in which certain events of default, as detailed in the new credit facility agreement, will result in acceleration of the call date of the new credit facility. Management reviews these events on a regular basis and believes that the Company currently has not triggered any of these events.

As of ~~September~~December 136, 2009, under the most restrictive covenants as defined in the new revolving loan facility, the Company was required to maintain a minimum interest coverage ratio, as defined in the amended revolving loan facility agreement, of 1.10 to 1.00. The maximum allowable senior secured debt leverage ratio, as defined in the amended revolving loan agreement, is 3.00 to 1.00. As of ~~September~~December 136, 2009, the Company was in compliance with ~~all~~ all of the financial covenants of its amended revolving loan facility agreement.

The Company had $68.76 million outstanding under the new term loan facility with no availability to borrow at ~~September~~December 136, 2009. Also, as of the ~~fiscal~~ fiscal quarter end, the Company had noan outstanding balance of $6.0 million under the ~~amended~~ amended revolving loan facility as a result of the withdrawal of that amount during the current quarterly period, with $159.0 million available to borrow, subject to the Company maintaining compliance with the facility covenants. The interest rate at ~~September~~December 136, 2009 for the amended revolving loan facility was at a rate of base plus 2.50% and/or LIBOR plus 3.50%. The effective interest rate on the balances outstanding under the new term loan facility was 32.083% at ~~September~~ 13December 6, 2009.

The final repayment of any outstanding amounts under the amended revolving loan facility is due November 30, 2010., and as such, the outstanding balance of the revolving loan facility was included in the current maturities of long-term debt at December 6, 2009. The new term loan facility commenced amortization in quarterly installments of $0.192 million beginning December 31, 2007 through September 30, 2012. The final settlement of any outstanding amounts under the new term loan facility is due November 30, 2012.

Under the new credit facility, the Company may obtain additional funding through incremental loan commitments in an amount not to exceed $75.0 million provided that the Company remains in compliance with its financial covenants on a pro forma basis. As of December 6, 2009, there were no borrowings against the incremental loan facility.

In addition to providing fixed principal payment schedules for the new credit facility, the loan agreement also includes an Excess Cash Flow Repayment Provision that requires repayment of principal based on the Company’s leverage ratio, EBITDA, working capital, debt service and tax payments. The excess cash flow amount is calculated and paid annually with the repayment of principal allocated on a pro rata basis to the new term and revolving loan facilities. The Company is also required to pay an annual commitment fee equal to 0.75% of the unused portion of the revolving credit facility.

On June 29, 2009, the Company made a payment of approximately $1.6 million under the Excess Cash Flow Repayment Provision of the new term loan facility based on the fiscal year ended March 29, 2009 financial results. Accordingly, the payment was included in the current maturities of long-term debt at March 29, 2009.

Table of Contents

NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

Under the new credit facility, the Company may obtain additional funding through incremental loan commitments in an amount not to exceed $75.0 million provided that the Company remains in compliance with its financial covenants on a pro forma basis. As of September 13, 2009, there were no borrowings against the incremental loan facility.

In addition to providing fixed principal payment schedules for the new credit facility, the loan agreement also includes an Excess Cash Flow Repayment Provision that requires repayment of principal based on the Company’s leverage ratio, EBITDA, working capital, debt service and tax payments. The excess cash flow amount is calculated and paid annually with the repayment of principal allocated on a pro rata basis to the new term and revolving loan facilities. The Company is also required to pay an annual non-utilization fee equal to 0.75% of the unused portion of the revolving credit facility.

9.	Commitments and Contingencies

Operating Leases

The Company is obligated under noncancellable operating leases and leases for office space which expire at various dates through 2015. Certain of the leases require additional payments for real estate taxes, water and common maintenance costs.

Employment Agreements

Two senior executives of the Company have employment agreements which terminate in ~~January~~December ~~2010~~2014. Pursuant to the agreements, the executives are ~~entitled~~ entitled to annual base salaries and annual bonuses based on the Company’s EBITDA for each year. These agreements also provide for severance payments ~~benefits~~ equal to two years’ base salary and benefits upon termination of employment by the Company without cause.

Other

The Company is involved in various claims and lawsuits which arise in the normal course of its business. Management does not believe that any of these actions will have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

10.	Related Party Transactions

In December 2004, the Company entered into a 10-year advisory agreement with CVC Management LLC (“CVC”), an affiliate of CVC Fund, now known as Court Square Capital Partners (“Court Square”), whereby the Company pays an annual advisory fee to Court Square. The advisory fee is equal to the greater of $0.21 million or 0.016% of the prior fiscal year consolidated revenue. On July 31, 2006, Court Square Advisor, LLC, was assigned the right to receive the fees payable by the Company pursuant to the advisory agreement between CVC Management LLC, and NCI. Under this agreement, the Company made no payments during the ~~six~~nine periods ended ~~September~~December 136, 2009 and paid $0.05 million in the ~~six~~nine periods ended ~~September~~December 147, 2008. The Company accrued $0.3136 million and $0.21 million for management fees as of ~~September~~December 136, 2009 and March 29, 2009, respectively. Court Square Advisor suspended collection of all advisory fees effective September 2008. The Company continues to accrue the advisory fees.

In addition, during the quarterly period ended December 6, 2009, the Company made a payment of $0.1 million to Court Square, to reimburse them for payments made to a third party consulting firm on behalf of the Company for a one-time sourcing project.

The Company has retained TMG Public Relations (“TMG”) to perform public relations and marketing services on its behalf on a project-by-project basis. TMG is owned by the spouse of Daniel McCarthy, NCI’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The Company made payments to TMG of $0.20 million and $0.15 million during the nine periods ended December 6, 2009 and December 7, 2008, respectively. The Company accrued $0.03 million and $0.02 million for services rendered as of December 6, 2009 and March 29, 2009, respectively. The Company expects to continue to use the services of TMG during the remainder of fiscal year 2010.

Effective July 31, 2007, the Company entered into an agreement with L&S Graphics, which is a digital printing company owned by Brandon Lee, one of the Company’s employees who performed the role of the general manager of By Design. The Company agreed to utilize L&S Graphics for all digitally printed materials related to the “By Design” products. L&S Graphics was later renamed “Digital Lizard”. Brandon Lee was hired on a two-year employment contract with an expiration date of July 31, 2009. As a result, effective that date, Brandon Lee is no longer an employee of the Company and Digital Lizard ceased to be a related party and L&S Graphics related party financial information for the current fiscal year is only presented for the six periods ended September 13, 2009. Under this agreement, the Company made payments of $0.68 million during the six periods ended September 13, 2009 and $1.4 million during the nine periods ended December 7, 2008 and accrued for $0.04 million as of March 29, 2009. Transactions with L&S Graphics subsequent to the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 are no longer considered related party transactions and are not disclosed in this report.

Effective July 31, 2007, the Company entered into an office lease agreement with MB&K, LLC which is owned by Brandon Lee, one of the Company’s employees who performed the role of the general manager of By Design. Brandon Lee was hired on a two-year employment contract with an expiration date of July 31, 2009. As a result, effective that date, Brandon Lee is no longer an employee of the Company and MB&K, LLC ceased to be a related party and MB&K LLC related party financial information for the current fiscal year is only presented for the six periods ended September 13, 2009. Under this agreement, the Company made payments of $0.07 million during the six periods ended September 13, 2009 and $0.09 million during the nine periods ended December 7, 2008, and recorded no accruals as of March 29, 2009, as the Company had met all its financial obligations under this agreement. Transactions with MB&K, LLC subsequent to the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 are no longer considered related party transactions and are not disclosed in this report.

Table of Contents

NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~NOTES TO~~PART ~~CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED~~ I –FINANCIAL ~~STATEMENTS~~INFORMATION ~~(UNAUDITED)~~

The Company has retained TMG Public Relations (“TMG”) to perform public relations and marketing services on its behalf on a project-by-project basis. TMG is owned by the spouse of Daniel McCarthy, NCI’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer. The Company made payments to TMG of $0.13 million and $0.07 million during the six periods ended September 13, 2009 and September 14, 2008, respectively. The Company accrued $0.06 million and $0.02 million for services rendered as of September 13, 2009 and March 29, 2009, respectively. The Company expects to continue to use the services of TMG during the remainder of fiscal year 2010.

Effective July 31, 2007, the Company entered into an agreement with L&S Graphics, which is a digital printing company owned by Brandon Lee, one of the Company’s employees who performed the role of the general manager of By Design. The Company agreed to utilize L&S Graphics for all digitally printed materials related to the “By Design” products. L&S Graphics was later renamed “Digital Lizard”. Under this agreement, the Company made payments of $0.68 million and $0.88 million during the six periods ended September 13, 2009 and September 14, 2008 and accrued for $0.14 million and $0.04 million as of September 13, 2009 and March 29, 2009, respectively. Brandon Lee was hired on a two-year employment contract with an expiration date of July 31, 2009. As a result, effective that date, Digital Lizard ceased to be a related party.

Effective July 31, 2007, the Company entered into an office lease agreement with MB&K, LLC which is owned by Brandon Lee, one of the Company’s employees who performed the role of the general manager of By Design. Under this agreement, the Company made payments of $0.07 million and $0.05 million during the six periods ended September 13, 2009 and September 14, 2008, respectively and recorded no accruals as of September 13, 2009 and March 29, 2009, as the Company had met all its financial obligations under this agreement. Brandon Lee was hired on a two-year employment contract with an expiration date of July 31, 2009. As a result, effective that date, MB&K, LLC ceased to be a related party.

Table of Contents

NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of our Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included as part of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This report contains forward-looking statements that are based upon current expectations. We sometimes identify forward-looking statements with such words as “may”, “will”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “estimate”, “seek”, “intend”, “believe” or similar words concerning future events. The forward-looking statements contained herein, include, without limitation, statements concerning future revenue sources and concentration, gross profit margins, selling, general and administrative expenses, capital resources, additional financings or borrowings and the effects of general industry and economic conditions; and are subject to risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by these forward-looking statements. We also urge you to carefully review the risk factors set forth in other documents we file from time to time with the SEC.

Overview of Operations

We are a Georgia corporation that was formed in 1980. The following discussion and analysis is based upon our unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements and our review of our business and operations. Furthermore, we believe the discussion and analysis of our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows as set forth below are not indicative nor should they be relied upon as an indicator of our future performance. The following discussion includes a comparison of our results of operations for the three periods ended ~~September~~December 136, 2009 to the three periods ended ~~September~~December 147, 2008 and the ~~six~~nine periods ended ~~September 13~~ December 6, ~~2009~~ 2009 to the ~~six~~nine periods ended ~~September 14~~ December 7, 2008.

We have 13 four-week reporting periods in each fiscal year. Our fiscal year refers to the 52-53 week accounting year ended on the last Sunday of March of that year. The first, second and third quarters each contain 3 periods, or 12 weeks each, and the fourth quarter contains 4 periods, or 16 weeks. In the 53-week accounting year, the fourth quarter contains 17 weeks.

We are one of the largest and most diversified publishers of information for the local real estate market in North America. Through our extensive proprietary network of online and print distribution points, we provide critical local information to consumers involved in buying, leasing and renovating a home. Our reader base selects our print and online publications almost exclusively for the extensive advertisements, and, as a result, we are able to provide high quality leads at an effective cost to our advertisers, which are comprised of real estate agents, property management companies, new home builders and home renovation product and service providers. In fiscal year 2009, we believe that we generated over ten million leads for our advertisers. We operate in over 550 targeted markets which may overlap geographically across the U.S. and Canada. The predominant content in our publications is advertisements, and our two largest publications are 100% advertisement based. In the resale and new sales home market, our flagship brand, The Real Estate Book (“TREB”), is the largest real estate advertising publication in North America. In the rental and leasing market, we provide residential and commercial leasing listings, primarily through Apartment Finder and Black’s Guide. In the home design and home improvement market, we are the largest publisher of local and regional design magazines for the luxury market, including Kansas City Homes & Gardens, Atlanta Homes & Lifestyles, Colorado Homes & Lifestyles, Mountain Living and New England Home.

1716

Table of Contents

We distribute our printed publications through an extensive rack distribution network, comprised of high traffic locations in areas frequented by our target consumers. In addition, we maintain more than 30,000 uniquely shaped proprietary sidewalk distribution boxes. For those products targeting affluent consumers and businesses, we utilize sophisticated database management and customer acquisition tools in order to develop highly targeted direct mail distribution. We also distribute all of our content — including our database of more than 1.8 million homes and apartments — online to our advertisers. We maintain a proprietary online network which has over two million unique visitors each month. In addition, we distribute our content to over twenty online distribution partners, including Trulia and BobVila.com with a monthly reach of over 47 million online users. We believe our combined online and print distribution network, which is provided to advertisers at one all-inclusive cost, drives exceptional results for our advertisers.

We have two marketing channels through which we generate revenue, the Independent Distributor (“ ID”) channel and the Direct channel. In our ID channel, the independent distributor is responsible for selling the advertising, collecting listings from agents/brokers and distributing publications in a specific geographic market. In our Direct channel, we sell the advertising, collect the listings from the agents/brokers and create, print and distribute the publications.

As of ~~September~~December 136, 2009, we had ~~805~~803 employees, ~~391~~387 of which were located at our corporate headquarters and production facility in Lawrenceville, Georgia, a suburb of Atlanta.

We believe the key drivers of financial performance are:

·	advertising volume;

·	expansion into other local real estate markets;

·	strong brand recognition; and

·	per unit cost to produce our publications.

Business Trends

Real estate market conditions continue to change. Our management team focuses on several key indicators – annual sales volume of existing homes and the months of supply of unsold homes; the market tightness index compiled by the National Multi Housing Council; the Remodeling Market Index compiled by the National Association of Home Builders; interest rates and consumer confidence.

· Sales volume of existing homes and months of supply of unsold homes – Indicators for the resale home market ~~showed~~continued to show a positive trend line in the ~~April~~September 2009 to ~~July~~November 2009 timeframe ~~before falling back in the month of August~~. Existing home sales experienced monthly sequential gains in ~~April~~September, ~~May,~~October ~~June~~ and ~~July~~November ~~of the current year~~2009. The annualized rate of sales in ~~August~~November 2009 was 56.15 million units which was up ~~3.5~~44% from ~~August~~November 2008. The median home price in ~~August~~November 2009 was $~~177~~172,~~700~~600, a decrease of 124.53% from the prior year. The ~~recent~~November ~~pick-up~~home inprice was also down from the August 2009 median home ~~sale~~price ~~transactions~~of ~~has~~$177,300. ~~skewed~~Home sales continued to skew toward the lower priced segment of the market, ~~bolstered~~assisted by ~~the~~a ~~first~~surge of first-time home ~~buyer~~buyers taking advantage of the government sponsored tax credit prior to its original November 30 deadline. ~~Foreclosures~~First-time ~~remained~~buyers aaccounted ~~factor~~for asmore ~~foreclosure~~than ~~filings~~50% ~~were~~of ~~reported~~November onhome ~~over~~transactions. ~~358,000~~Distressed properties, indefined ~~August~~as ~~2009~~either short sales or foreclosed sales, anremained ~~increase~~a offactor ~~18%~~as ~~compared~~they tomade ~~the~~up ~~prior~~33% ~~year~~of sales in November. The total inventory of unsold existing homes in ~~August~~November 2009 stood at 3.6 million units or 86.5 months of inventory based on the current sales pace. This compares favorably to ~~August~~November 2008 when the number of unsold homes was 4.42 million or 1011.60 months of inventory. New home sales showed weakness during the September to November timeframe. November new home sales were 355,000, a decline of 11.3% and 13.2% compared to October 2009 and November 2008, respectively. Total inventory of new homes in November was 235,000, which represented a 7.9 month supply at the current sales pace.

1817

Table of Contents

· The Market Tightness Index – The National Multi Housing Council’s (“NMHC”) market tightness index in October 2009 was 31, an improvement compared to the August 2009 ~~stood~~reading atof 20. A reading ~~above~~below 50 indicates that markets are experiencing ~~higher~~lower occupancy rates and ~~higher~~lower rental rates. ~~Apartment~~The national vacancy rates ~~were at record levels~~ in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 ~~as the national vacancy rate~~ for investment-grade apartments ~~reached~~was 7.9%, a slight improvement to the 8.1% rating in the second quarter of 2009 but still up from 6.2% in the prior year. Same store rents for professionally managed apartments declined by 3.4.6%, ~~the~~surpassing ~~biggest~~last ~~drop~~quarter’s on record decline of 3.4%. Multifamily construction continued to fall with permits and starts down compared to prior year by 7265.16% and 67.10%, respectively. The permits and starts statistics in the third quarter were the lowest on record. Apartment transaction volume in the 2009 third quarter of $3.6 billion was up 12.1% from the second quarter but still down 64.2% compared to the third quarter of 2008. The average price for properties sold in the third quarter of 2009 was $78,709 per unit, down 9.7% from the second quarter of 2009 and 30.5% from the prior year. Multifamily housing trends have historically been correlated to the employment market and job growth. The increase in vacancy rates and the drop in rents are being driven by the ~~increasing~~high rate of unemployment.

· The Remodeling Market Index (“RMI”) - The RMI rose to 3839.18 in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2009 from a 3438.51 reading in the ~~first~~second quarter of 2009. This signaled athe ~~sequential~~third straight quarter of improvement in the ~~home remodeling market~~index, however the index needs to register a reading of over 50 to signal that the majority of remodelers view market conditions as improving. AOverall ~~positive~~market ~~signal~~conditions ~~for~~remain ~~future~~weak, ~~activity~~however ~~was that~~ remodelers ~~reported~~did ~~growth~~report inthat ~~both~~conditions ~~calls for bids and appointments for proposals~~ in ~~the~~their ~~second~~markets ~~quarter~~are stabilizing. Mortgage interest rates during the ~~July~~third ~~2009~~quarter toof ~~September~~ 2009 ~~period~~ remained at favorable levels, however the main challenges as they relate to home remodeling business levels continue to be the availability of credit and the shrinking amount of home equity resulting from ~~declining~~lower home prices.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The fair values of our financial assets and liabilities at December 6, 2009 and March 29, 2009, equal the carrying values reported on the consolidated balance sheets except for the new senior secured term loan facility entered into on July 20, 2007 (the “new term loan facility”), the10 ¾% senior notes (“senior notes”) and the senior subordinated note. The fair values of the new term loan facility and senior notes are based on quoted market values. The fair value of the new term loan facility was $45.9 million and $42.4 million as compared to the carrying values of $68.6 million and $70.7 million as of December 6, 2009 and March 29, 2009, respectively. The fair value of the senior notes was $70.2 million and $24.7 million as compared to the carrying amounts of $175.0 million and $175.0 million as of December 6, 2009 and March 29, 2009, respectively. The senior subordinated note does not trade in a market so the fair value is based on appropriate valuation methodologies including option model and liquidation analyses. The fair value of the senior subordinated note was $6.0 million and $6.0 million as compared to the carrying amounts of $44.3 million and $40.9 million as of December 6, 2009 and March 29, 2009, respectively.

Revenue

Our principal revenue earning activity is related to the sale of online and print advertising by both ID as well as direct sales to customers through Company-managed distribution territories. Independent Distributors are contracted to manage certain distribution territories on behalf of NCI. We maintain ownership of all magazines and distribution territories. Prepaid subscriptions are recorded as unearned revenue when received and recognized as revenue over the term of the subscription.

Costs

Operating expenses include cost of sales; depreciation and amortization; and selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”). Cost of sales include all costs associated with our Georgia production facility, our outsourced printing, which are the costs we pay to third party printers to print books not printed in our Georgia production facility, our field sales operations, field distribution operations, online operations and bad debt expense. SG&A expenses include all corporate departments, corporate headquarters, and the management of the publications.

Our operating expense base consists of almost 75% fixed costs. These expenses relate to our production facility in Georgia, our national distribution network and our sales management infrastructure. The remaining 25% of operating expenses are variable and relate to paper, ink, sales commissions, performance-based bonuses, bad debt expense and third party production expenses. Costs related to our workforce are the largest single expense item, accounting for almost 38% of our total operating expense base. The second largest expense item, which accounts for approximately 18~~% of our total operating expense base, is the cost associated with producing our publications. We expect to be able to continue to manage our expense growth to levels consistent with past years.~~

Table of Contents

Our operating expense base consists of almost 75% fixed costs. These expenses relate to our production facility in Georgia, our national distribution network and our sales management infrastructure. The remaining 25% of operating expenses are variable and relate to paper, ink, sales commissions, performance-based bonuses, bad debt expense and third party production expenses. Costs related to our workforce are the largest single expense item, accounting for almost 38% of our total operating expense base. The second largest expense item, which accounts for approximately 18% of our total operating expense base, is the cost associated with producing our publications.

Depreciation and Amortization

Depreciation costs of computer, equipment and software relate primarily to the depreciation of our computer hardware and software developed for internal use or purchased, as well as property, plant and equipment. The depreciation and amortization of equipment and software associated with production is shown separately from our cost of sales in our ~~statement~~statements of operations. The amounts of depreciation and amortization expense related to production equipment and software for the ~~six~~nine periods ended ~~September 13~~December 6, 2009 and ~~September~~December 147, 2008 were $24.61 million and $23.46 million, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense related to nonproduction equipment and software is shown separately from the selling, general and administrative expenses in our ~~statement~~ ofstatements of operations. The amounts of depreciation and amortization ~~expense~~ expense related to nonproduction equipment and software for the ~~six~~nine periods ended December ~~September 13~~6, 2009 and ~~September~~December 147, 2008 were $01.94 million and $01.8 3 million, respectively. Depreciation for computer, equipment and software as well as property, plant and equipment is calculated on a straight-line basis over the expected useful life of the related asset class. Leasehold improvements and leased assets are amortized over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or lease terms.

Amortization costs relate to the amortization of intangible assets. Our two largest intangible assets are our independent distributor agreements and trademarks/trade names. The valuation and lives of our larger intangible assets (trademarks, trade names, independent distributors and advertiser lists) were determined by identifying the remaining useful life of the components of each asset combined with a reasonable attrition rate and a reasonable expectation for increase in revenue by each component. Certain markets experience a lower attrition rate. This has contributed to intangible assets with lives in excess of 15 years. The related amortization is calculated on a straight-line basis over the expected useful life of the intangible asset.

Interest Income and Interest Expense

Interest income consists primarily of interest income earned on our cash balances and interest earned on notes receivable. Interest expense consists primarily of interest on outstanding indebtedness, interest on capital leases, amortization of deferred financing costs and amortization of debt discounts.

Income Taxes

The following table sets forth the income tax benefit and effective tax rate for the three periods and ~~six~~nine periods ended ~~September~~December 136, 2009 and ~~September~~December 147, 2008:

	Three Periods Ended						~~Six~~Nine Periods Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	~~September~~December 136, 2009			~~September~~December 147, 2008			~~September~~December 136, 2009			~~September~~December 147, 2008
Income tax benefit	$	(12,~~650~~095	)	$	(~~618~~8,414	)	$	(35,~~573~~668	)	$	(19,~~284~~698	)
Effective tax rate		3335.93	%		359.64	%		3435.90	%		3210.4	%

Income tax benefit consists of current and deferred income taxes. The difference in effective income tax rates is due primarily to the impact of nondeductible expenses relative to the level of net loss before taxes between the two periods. ~~Also,~~partially offset by the ~~Company~~noncash ~~has~~goodwill impairment charge which was recorded in the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 pursuant to the performance of step one of the goodwill assessment for impairment as a result of the continued declines in our consolidated operating income during the first three quarters of fiscal year 2009. Also we have nondeductible expenses related to meals and entertainment and certain interest expenses related to ~~senior~~our ~~subordinated~~senior subordinated debt. We are subject to taxation in the United States of America (for federal and state) and Canada.

2019

Table of Contents

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth a summary of our operations and percentages of total consolidated revenue and operating income for the three periods and ~~six~~nine periods ended ~~September~~December 136, 2009 and ~~September~~December 147, 2008. Our three revenue areas are: (i) resale and new sales; (ii) rental and leasing; and (iii) remodeling and home improvement. The resale and new sales area includes The Real Estate Book (“TREB”), New Home Finder, Unique Homes, and ByHome by Design. Our rental/ and leasing area includes Apartment Finder, Mature Living Choices, and Black’s Guide. Our remodeling and home improvement area includes all of our home and design and home improvement publications.

	Three Periods Ended											~~Six~~Nine Periods Ended
	September 13, 2009					September 14, 2008						September 13, 2009					September 14, 2008
	December 6, 2009					December 7, 2008						December 6, 2009					December 7, 2008
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		%			Amount			%			Amount		%			Amount			%
Resale and new sales	$	11,~~705~~680		3234.96	%	$	1918,~~980~~474			42.75	%	$	2436,~~454~~134		34.24	%	$	4260,~~387~~862			4443.59	%
Rental and leasing		19,~~325~~070		5456.35	%		19,~~623~~528			4244.09	%		3857,~~436~~506		5354.87	%		3858,~~950~~478			4042.92	%
Remodeling and home improvement		42,~~542~~988		~~12.~~8.9	%		75,~~143~~474			1512.36	%		811,~~531~~519		1210.09	%		1319,~~859~~333			1413.69	%
Total revenue		3533,~~572~~738		100.0	%		4643,~~746~~476			100.0	%		71105,~~421~~159		100.0	%		95138,~~196~~673			100.0	%
Costs and expenses:
Cost of sales (including production depreciation and software amortization)		2524,~~245~~138		71.06	%		3231,~~686~~469			6972.94	%		5075,~~987~~126		71.4	%		6698,~~583~~052			6970.97	%
Selling, general and administrative (including nonproduction depreciation and software amortization)		5,~~182~~606		1416.6	%		5,~~144~~125			11.08	%		1015,~~369~~974		1415.52	%		1116,~~337~~462			11.9	%
Amortization of intangibles		3,~~492~~479		910.83	%		3,~~996~~984			89.62	%		710,~~059~~538		910.90	%		812,~~027~~012			8.57	%
Income from operations	$	1,653		4.6	%	$	4,920			10.5	%	$	3,006		4.2	%	$	9,249			9.7	%
Impairment loss		—		—	%		85,352			196.3	%		—		—	%		85,352			61.5	%
Income (loss) from operations	$	515		1.5	%	$	(82,454	)		(189.7	)%	$	3,521		3.4	%	$	(73,205	)		(52.8	)%

Three Periods Ended ~~September~~December 136, 2009 Compared to Three Periods Ended ~~September~~December 147, 2008

Revenue. For the three periods ended ~~September~~December 136, 2009, total consolidated revenue was $3533.67 million compared to $4643.75 million for the three periods ended ~~September~~December 147, 2008. This was a decrease of $119.18 million or 2322.85%. Our resale and new sales area declined by $86.38 million or 4136.58% from $2018.05 million in the three periods ended ~~September 14~~December 7, 2008 to $11.7 million in the three periods ended ~~September~~December 136, 2009. Our rental and leasing showed a year-over-year revenue decline of $0.34 million or 12.51% from $19.65 million in the three periods ended ~~September 14~~December 7, 2008 to $19.31 million in the ~~three~~ three periods ended ~~September 13~~December 6, 2009. Our remodeling and home ~~improvement~~ improvement area decreased by $2.6 5 million or 3645.65% from $75.15 million in the ~~three~~ three periods ended ~~September 14~~December 7, 2008 to $43.5 0 million in the three ~~periods~~ periods ended ~~September~~December 136, 2009. The revenue declines in the resale and new sales area and the remodeling and home improvement areas were due to the ~~weak~~ weak economic conditions in the real estate market. The revenue decline in the ~~rental~~ rental and leasing area was mainly attributable to the decline in the ad page volume for Black’s Guide and Mature Living Choices as a result of the slowdowns in the commercial real estate and new home markets, respectively.

Table of Contents

TREB posted revenue of $8.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to $11.9 million during the same period in fiscal year 2009 which was a decrease of $3.9 million, or 32.8%. The TREB ID sales channel had revenue of $5.5 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to $8.3 million during the same period of fiscal year 2009, a decrease of $2.8 million or 33.7%. The decline was related to continued softness in the real estate market and some market consolidations. The TREB Direct sales channel had a revenue decrease of $1.1 million or 30.6% from $3.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 to $2.5 million during the same period of fiscal year 2010. Unique Homes had revenue of $0.9 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to $1.4 million in the same period of fiscal year 2009, a decrease of $0.5 million or 35.7% The decrease correlates with the decline in the turnover of luxury home sales.

Apartment Finder revenue for the three periods ended December 6, 2009 was $18.5 million flat compared to the three periods ended December 7, 2008. Despite the challenges in the multi-family industry, we have been able to maintain our customer counts of our Apartment Finder brand. Black’s Guide revenue decreased by $0.4 million or 57.1% from $0.7 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 to $0.3 million during the same period of fiscal year 2010 due to the contraction in the commercial real estate market.

Our remodeling and home improvement area produced revenue of $3.0 million in the three periods ended December 6, 2009 compared to $5.5 million during the three periods ended December 7, 2008, a decrease of $2.5 million or 45.5%. The decrease was the result of advertisers reducing their marketing expenditures in response to the continued weak conditions in the job market, falling home prices and reduced availability of consumer credit. Our publications in this area include: Kansas City Homes & Gardens, At Home in Arkansas, New England Home, Relocating in St. Louis, regional Home Improvement magazines, and the Homes & Lifestyles magazines.

Cost of sales. Cost of sales for the three periods ended December 6, 2009 was $22.7 million, a decrease of $7.6 million, or 25.1%, from $30.3 million during the three periods ended December 7, 2008. The expense of labor and related expenses, which is our largest cost component, was $10.2 million in the three periods ended December 6, 2009 compared to $12.8 million during the three periods ended December 7, 2008, a decrease of $2.6 million, or 20.3%. The decrease reflects a reduction in headcount. Total commission and bonus expense decreased by $0.5 million or 20.0% from $2.5 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 to $2.0 million during the same period of fiscal year 2010 due to our revenue decline. Paper expense decreased by $1.3 million or 34.2%, from $3.8 million in the three periods ended December 7, 2008 to $2.5 million in the three periods ended December 6, 2009. The decrease was related to lower ad page volume and more favorable paper prices. Our outsource production expense for the current quarter was $1.2 million, a decrease of $0.7 million or 36.8% from the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 expense of $1.9 million. The decrease in outsource production expense was attributable to bringing outsourced books back in-house and the decrease in our revenue. Distribution expense decreased in the current fiscal quarter by approximately $0.8 million or 33.3% compared to the same period in the prior year primarily due to reduced spend with third party distribution companies and re-negotiated rates on our retail distribution contracts. The expense of our E-business and online operations decreased by $0.5 million or 35.7% from $1.4 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 to $0.9 million in the current quarter. We were able to achieve savings by restructuring our operations while continuing to invest in online distribution.

Production depreciation and software amortization expense. Production depreciation and software amortization expense in the three periods ended December 6, 2009 and December 7, 2008 was $1.5 million and $1.2 million, respectively, which was an increase of $0.3 million or 25.0%. The increase was the result of equipment and software purchased during the prior four fiscal quarters partially offset by software assets being fully depreciated during the same period.

Gross Profit. Our gross profit decreased by $2.4 million or 20.0% from $12.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 to $9.6 million in the third quarter of fiscal year 2010. The decrease was mainly related to the decline in revenues of $9.8 million in the current quarter compared to the same period of the prior year partially offset by a decrease in the cost of sales of $7.6 million in addition to the increase of production depreciation and software amortization expense of $0.3 million. The gross profit percentage for the current quarter was 28.5% compared to 27.6% in the same period of the prior year. The increase was mainly attributable to the continued monitoring programs of our costs and expenses.

Table of Contents

~~TREB~~Selling, ~~posted~~general ~~revenue~~and ofadministrative expenses $8(“SG&A”).~~8 million~~ SG&A inexpenses for the ~~second~~three ~~quarter~~periods ended ofDecember ~~fiscal~~6, ~~year~~2009 ~~2010~~were ~~compared to~~ $145.61 million ~~during~~, ~~the same period in fiscal year 2009~~ which was aan ~~decrease~~increase of $50.84 million, or 398.75%~~. The~~ ~~TREB~~compared IDto ~~sales channel had revenue of~~ $64.07 million in the ~~second~~three ~~quarter~~periods ofended ~~fiscal~~December ~~year 2010 compared to $10.0 million during the same period of fiscal year 2009~~7, ~~a decrease of $4.0~~ ~~million or 40~~2008.~~0%.~~ ~~The~~Labor ~~decline~~and ~~was~~ related toexpenses ~~continued softness~~ in the ~~real~~three ~~estate~~periods ~~market~~ended ~~and~~December 6, ~~some~~2009 ~~market~~were ~~consolidations~~$2. ~~The~~4 ~~TREB~~million, ~~Direct~~an ~~sales~~increase ~~channel had a revenue decrease~~ of $10.81 million, or 394.13%, from $~~4.6 million in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009 to $~~2.8 3 million during the same period ~~of fiscal year 2010. Unique Homes had revenue of $0.9 million~~ in ~~the second quarter of~~ fiscal year ~~2010~~ ~~compared to $1.0 million in the same period of fiscal year~~ 2009~~, a decrease of $0~~.~~1 million or 10.0%. The decrease correlates with the decline in the turnover of luxury home sales.~~

~~Apartment~~Nonproduction ~~Finder~~depreciation ~~revenue for~~and ~~the~~software ~~three~~amortization ~~periods ended September 13, 2009 was $18~~expense.7 Nonproduction ~~million~~depreciation ~~compared to $18.5~~and ~~million~~software ~~during~~amortization ~~the~~expense ~~three~~increased ~~periods~~by ~~ended September 14, 2008, an increase of~~ $0.~~2 million or~~ 1~~.1%. We~~ ~~have increased ad pages in some of our existing markets and grown our sales of online products. Black’s Guide revenue decreased $0.4~~ million or 5025.0% from $0.8 4 million in the ~~second~~third quarter of fiscal year 2009 to $0.45 million ~~during~~in the same period of fiscal year 2010. The ~~due to~~increase was the ~~contraction~~result inof equipment and software purchased during the ~~commercial~~prior ~~real~~four ~~estate~~fiscal ~~market~~quarters partially offset by software assets being fully depreciated during the same period.

~~Our~~Amortization of ~~remodeling~~intangibles. Amortization ~~and~~expense ~~home~~was ~~improvement area produced revenue of~~ $43.5 million in the three periods ended ~~September~~December 136, 2009, compared to $74.10 million ~~during~~for the three periods ended ~~September~~December 147, 2008, a decrease of $20.65 million or 3612.65%. The decrease was ~~the~~related ~~result~~to ofintangible ~~advertisers~~assets ~~reducing~~being ~~their~~fully ~~marketing~~depreciated ~~expenditures~~during ~~in response to~~ the ~~continued~~prior ~~weak~~four ~~conditions~~fiscal ~~in the job market, falling home prices and reduced availability of consumer credit~~quarters. Our publications in this area include: Kansas City Homes & Gardens, At Home In Arkansas, Relocating in Las Vegas, New England Home, Relocating in St. Louis, regional home improvement magazines, and the Homes & Lifestyles magazines.

~~Cost~~Impairment ~~of sales~~loss. ~~Cost~~ As of December ~~sales~~7, ~~for the three periods ended September 13~~2008, ~~2009~~ ~~was~~we ~~$23.9~~performed ~~million,~~an aassessment ~~decrease~~ of ~~$7.6~~goodwill ~~million,~~for orimpairment ~~24.1%, from $31.5 million~~under ~~during~~ the ~~three~~authoritative ~~periods~~guidance ~~ended~~for ~~September 14, 2008~~goodwill. ~~Labor~~ ~~expense, which~~We iscompleted ~~our~~step ~~largest~~one ~~cost~~of ~~component, was $10.5 million in~~ the ~~three periods~~analysis ~~ended~~which ~~September~~resulted ~~13,~~in ~~2009~~a ~~compared~~potential toimpairment ~~$13.5~~of ~~million~~goodwill ~~during~~for the ~~three~~Resale ~~periods~~and New ~~ended~~Sales ~~September~~unit ~~14,~~and ~~2008,~~the aRemodeling ~~decrease~~and ofHome $3Improvement unit.0 ~~million~~Therefore, orwe ~~22.2%. The~~recorded ~~decrease reflects~~ a ~~reduction~~noncash inestimated ~~headcount. Total~~impairment ~~commission~~loss ~~and bonus expense decreased by $0.5 million or 19.2% from $2.6 million~~ in the ~~second quarter~~amount of ~~fiscal year 2009 to~~ $285.~~1 million during the same period of fiscal year 2010 due to our revenue decline. Paper expense decreased by $1.2 million or 29.3%, from $~~4.1 million in the three periods ended ~~September~~December 147, ~~2008~~ ~~to $2~~2008.9 ~~million~~Step intwo ~~the three periods ended September 13, 2009. Our outsource production expense for the current quarter~~ was ~~$1.3~~ ~~million,~~completed ain ~~decrease of $0.5 million or 27.8% from~~ the ~~second~~fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009 ~~expense of $1.8 million. The decrease in outsource production expense was attributable to bringing outsourced books back in-house~~ and ~~the~~resulted ~~decrease~~ in ~~our~~an ~~revenue. Distribution~~additional ~~expense decreased in the current fiscal quarter by approximately~~ $134.01 million orrecorded ~~37.0% compared to the same period~~ in the ~~prior year primarily due to reduced spend with third~~ ~~party~~fourth ~~distribution companies. The expense of our E-business and online operations decreased by $0.7 million or 43.8% from $1.6 million in the second~~ quarter of fiscal year 2009 ~~to $0~~.~~9 million in the current quarter. We were able to achieve savings by restructuring our operations while continuing to invest in online distribution.~~

~~Production~~Net ~~depreciation and software~~interest ~~amortization~~ expense. ~~Production~~Net ~~depreciation~~interest ~~and software amortization~~ expense infor the three periods ended December ~~September 13~~6, 2009 ~~and~~was ~~September 14, 2008 were~~ $16.35 million ~~and~~compared to the net interest expense of $16.2 8 million, ~~respectively,~~during ~~which~~the ~~was~~three anperiods ~~increase~~ended December 7, 2008. The decrease of $0.13 million or 84.34%~~. The~~ ~~increase~~ was ~~the~~related ~~result~~to oflower ~~equipment~~interest ~~and~~rates on our new senior ~~software~~term ~~purchased~~loan ~~during~~facility ~~the~~in ~~prior~~addition ~~four~~to ~~fiscal~~a ~~quarters~~lower ~~partially~~senior term loan balance partially offset by the write off of deferred financing fees in connection with the ~~software~~amendment ~~assets~~of ~~being~~May ~~fully~~4, ~~depreciated~~2009 ~~during~~of the ~~same~~new ~~period~~revolving loan agreement, and a higher balance on our senior subordinated note.

~~Gross~~Net ~~Profit~~loss. Due ~~Our gross~~to ~~profit~~the ~~decreased~~factors bydescribed ~~$3.8~~above, ~~million~~we orreported ~~27.0%~~a ~~from~~net ~~$14.1~~loss ~~million in the second quarter~~ of ~~fiscal year 2009 to~~ $~~10.~~3.8 million induring the ~~second quarter of fiscal~~ ~~year~~three ~~2010.~~periods ~~The~~ended ~~decrease~~December ~~was~~6, ~~mainly~~2009, ~~related~~compared to ~~the~~a ~~decline~~net inloss ~~revenues~~ of $1180.1 8 million during in the ~~current~~three ~~quarter~~periods ~~compared~~ended toDecember ~~the~~7, ~~same~~2008. ~~period~~The ofsignificant ~~the~~change ~~prior~~in ~~year~~our ~~partially~~operating ~~offset~~results byfor ~~a decrease in~~ the ~~cost~~quarter of ~~sales~~the ofprior ~~$7.6~~fiscal ~~million.~~year ~~The~~compared ~~gross profit~~to ~~percentage for~~ the current quarter was ~~29.0%~~related ~~compared~~ to ~~30.1%~~the innoncash ~~the same~~estimated ~~period~~impairment loss of $85.4 million ~~the~~that ~~prior~~was ~~year.~~recorded ~~The~~in ~~decrease~~the ~~was~~third ~~mainly~~quarter ~~attributable~~of tofiscal ~~lower~~year 2009, ~~revenues~~pursuant ~~and~~to ~~the~~our ~~fact~~conducting ~~that~~step ~~some~~one of ~~our~~the ~~cost~~analysis of ~~sales~~goodwill ~~expenses~~for ~~are~~impairment ~~fixed~~as of December 7, 2008.

Nine Periods Ended December 6, 2009 Compared to Nine Periods Ended December 7, 2008

Revenue. For the nine periods ended December 6, 2009, total consolidated revenue was $105.2 million compared to $138.7 million for the nine periods ended December 7, 2008. This was a decrease of $33.5 million or 24.2%. Our resale and new sales area declined by $24.8 million or 40.7% from $60.9 million in the nine periods ended December 7, 2008 to $36.1 million in the nine periods ended December 6, 2009. Our rental and leasing area showed a year-over-year revenue decrease of $1.0 million or 1.7% from $58.5 million in the nine periods ended December 7, 2008 to $57.5 million in the nine periods ended December 6, 2009. Our remodeling and home improvement area decreased by $7.8 million or 40.4% from $19.3 million in the nine periods ended December 7, 2008 to $11.5 million in the nine periods ended December 6, 2009. The revenue declines in the resale and new sales area and the remodeling and home improvement areas were due to the weak economic conditions in the real estate market. The decline in revenue in the rental and leasing area was mainly attributable to the decline in the ad page volume for Black’s Guide and Mature Living Choices as a result of the slowdowns in the commercial real estate and new home markets, respectively.

Table of Contents

~~Selling,~~TREB ~~general~~posted ~~and~~revenue ~~administrative expenses~~of ~~(“SG&A”)~~$26. ~~SG&A~~1 million ~~expenses~~in ~~for~~ the ~~three~~nine periods ended ~~September~~December 136, 2009 ~~were~~compared to $442.4 million during the nine periods ended December 7, 2008 which was a decrease of $16.3 million or 38.4%. The decline was attributable to the slowdown in the real estate market. The TREB ID sales channel had revenue of $17.9 million in the nine periods ended December 6, ~~flat~~2009 compared to $29.2 million during the ~~three~~nine periods ended ~~September~~December 147, 2008, a decrease of $11.3 million or 38.7%. ~~Labor~~The ~~and~~decline was related ~~expenses~~to continued softness in the ~~three~~real estate market and some market consolidations. The TREB Direct sales channel had a revenue decrease of $5.1 million or 38.6% from $13.2 million in the nine periods ended ~~September~~December 137, ~~2009~~2008 ~~were~~to $28.51 million during the nine periods ended December 6, an2009. Unique ~~increase~~Homes ofhad revenue of $03.10 million in the nine periods ended December 6, or 2009 compared to $4.2% million in the nine periods ended December 7, ~~from~~2008, a decrease of $21.42 million ~~during~~or 28.6%. The ~~the~~decrease ~~same~~correlates ~~period~~with the decline in ~~fiscal~~the ~~year~~turnover of ~~2008~~luxury home sales.

~~Nonproduction~~Apartment ~~depreciation~~Finder ~~and~~revenue for ~~software~~the ~~amortization~~nine ~~expense~~periods ended December 6, 2009 was $55. ~~Nonproduction~~6 ~~depreciation~~million ~~and~~compared to $55.1 ~~software~~million ~~amortization~~during ~~expense~~the ~~increased~~nine byperiods ended December 7, 2008, an increase of $0.5 million or 0.9%. Despite the challenges in the multifamily industry, we have been able to maintain our customer counts of our Apartment Finder brand. Black’s Guide revenue decreased by $1.0 million or 2545.05% from $02.4 2 million in the nine ~~second~~periods ~~quarter~~ended ofDecember ~~fiscal~~7, ~~year~~2008 ~~2009~~ to $01.52 million induring the ~~same~~nine periods ~~period~~ended ~~off~~December ~~fiscal~~6, ~~year~~2009 ~~2010~~due to the contraction in the commercial real estate market.

~~Amortization of~~Our ~~intangibles. Amortization~~remodeling ~~expense~~and ~~was~~home improvement area produced revenue of $311.5 million in the ~~three~~nine periods ended ~~September~~December 136, 2009, compared to $419.03 million ~~for~~during the ~~three~~nine periods ended ~~September~~December 147, 2008, a decrease of $07.58 million or 1240.54%. The decrease was ~~related~~the toresult ~~intangible~~of ~~assets~~advertisers ~~being~~reducing ~~fully~~their ~~depreciated~~marketing ~~during~~expenditures in response to the ~~prior~~continued ~~four~~weak ~~fiscal~~conditions ~~quarters~~in the job market, falling home prices and reduced availability of consumer credit. Our publications in this area include: Kansas City Homes & Gardens, At Home in Arkansas, New England Home, Relocating in St. Louis, regional Home Improvement magazines, and the Homes & Lifestyles magazines.

~~Net~~Cost ~~interest~~of ~~expense~~sales. ~~Net~~Cost ~~interest~~of ~~expense~~sales for the ~~three~~nine periods ended ~~September~~ ~~13,~~December 6, 2009 was $671.1 million, a decrease of $23.4 million, or 24.8%, from $94.5 million during the nine periods ended December 7, 2008. The expense of labor and related expenses, which is our largest cost component, was $31.2 million in the nine periods ended December 6, 2009 compared to $40.4 million during the ~~net~~nine ~~interest~~periods ~~expense~~ended December 7, 2008, a decrease of $69.2 million, or 22.8%. The decrease reflects a reduction in headcount. Total commission and bonus expense decreased by $1.9 million or 23.8% from $8.0 million in the nine periods ended December 7, 2008 to $6.1 million during the ~~three~~nine periods ended ~~September~~December 146, 2009 due to our revenue decline. Paper expense decreased by $3.6 million or 29.8%, from $12.1 million in the nine periods ended December 7, 2008 to $8.5 million in the nine periods ended December 6, 2009. The decrease was related to lower ~~interest~~ad page ~~rates~~volumes onand ~~our~~more ~~new~~favorable ~~senior~~paper ~~term~~prices. Our ~~loan~~outsource ~~facility~~production inexpense ~~addition~~for tothe anine ~~lower~~periods ~~senior~~ended ~~term~~December ~~loan~~6, ~~balance~~2009 ~~partially~~was ~~offset~~$3.9 bymillion, a decrease of $1.9 million or 32.8% from the nine periods ended December 7, 2008 ~~write~~expense ~~off~~of $5.8 million as a result of ~~deferred~~bringing ~~financing~~outsourced ~~fees~~books back in-house and ~~connection~~lower ~~with~~page volume. Distribution expense decreased in the ~~amendment~~nine periods ofended ~~May~~December 46, 2009 ofby approximately $2.6 million or 32.9% compared to the ~~new~~same ~~revolving~~period ~~loan~~in ~~agreement,~~the ~~and~~prior ayear ~~higher~~as ~~balance~~we reduced our spend with third party distribution companies and re-negotiated rates on our ~~senior~~retail distribution ~~subordinated~~contracts. The ~~note~~expense of our E-business and online operations decreased by $1.9 million or 39.6% from $4.8 million in the nine periods ended December 7, 2008 to $2.9 million in the nine periods ended December 6, 2009. We achieved savings by restructuring operations while increasing our online distribution investment.

~~Net~~Production ~~loss~~depreciation and software amortization expense. ~~Due~~Production todepreciation and software amortization expense in the ~~factors~~nine ~~described~~periods ~~above~~ended December 6, we2009 ~~reported~~was a$4.1 million. This ~~net~~was ~~loss~~an increase of $0.5 million, or 13.9%, compared to $3.26 million ~~during~~for the ~~three~~ nine periods ended ~~September~~December 137, ~~2009,~~2008. The increase ~~compared~~was tothe aresult ~~net~~of ~~loss~~equipment ofand ~~$1.1~~software ~~million~~ purchased during the ~~three~~prior four ~~periods~~fiscal ~~ended~~quarters ~~September~~partially ~~14,~~offset ~~2008~~by software assets being fully depreciated during the same period.

~~Six~~Gross Profit. Our gross ~~Periods~~profit ~~Ended~~decreased ~~September~~by 13$10.6 million or 26.1% from $40.6 million in the nine periods ended December 7, 2008 to $30.0 million in the nine periods ended December 6, 2009. The ~~Compared~~decrease was mainly related to ~~Six~~the ~~Periods~~decline ~~Ended~~in revenues ~~September~~of 14$33.5 million in the nine periods ended December 6, 2009 compared to ~~2008~~the same period of the prior year partially offset by a decrease in the cost of sales of $23.4 million in addition to the increase of production depreciation and software amortization expense of $0.5 million. The gross profit percentage for the nine periods ended December 6, 2009 was 28.6% compared to 29.3% in the same period of the prior year. The decrease was mainly attributable to lower revenues and the fact that some of our cost of sales expenses are fixed.

Revenue. For the six periods ended September 13, 2009, total consolidated revenue was $71.4 million compared to $95.2 million for the six periods ended September 14, 2008. This was a decrease of $23.8 million or 25.0%. Our resale and new sales area declined by $17.9 million or 42.2% from $42.4 million in the six periods ended September 14, 2008 to $24.5 million in the six periods ended September 13, 2009. Our rental and leasing showed a year-over-year revenue decrease of $0.5 million or 1.3% from $38.9 million in the six periods ended September 14, 2008 to $38.4 million in the six periods ended September 13, 2009. Our remodeling and home improvement area decreased by $5.4 million or 38.8% from $13.9 million in the six periods ended September 14, 2008 to $8.5 million in the six periods ended September 13, 2009. The revenue declines in the resale and new sales area and the remodeling and home improvement areas were due to the weak economic conditions in the real estate market. The decline in revenue in the rental and leasing area was attributable to the decline in the ad page volume for Black’s Guide and Mature Living Choices as a result of the slowdowns in the commercial real estate and new home markets, respectively.

TREB posted revenue of $18.0 million in the six periods ended September 13, 2009 compared to $30.5 million during the six periods ended September 14, 2008 which was a decrease of $12.5 million, or 41.0%. The decline was attributable to the slowdown in the real estate market. The TREB ID sales channel had revenue of $12.3 million in the six periods ended September 13, 2009 compared to $20.9 million during the six periods ended September 14, 2008, a decrease of $8.6 million or 41.1%. The TREB Direct sales channel had a revenue decrease of $4.0 million or 41.7% from $9.6 million in the six periods ended September 14, 2008 to $5.6 million during the six periods ended September 13, 2009. Unique Homes had revenue of $2.1 million in the six periods ended September 13, 2009 compared to $2.8 million in the six periods ended September 14, 2008, a decrease of $0.7 million or 25.0%. The decrease correlates with the decline in the turnover of luxury home sales.

Apartment Finder revenue for the six periods ended September 13, 2009 was $37.0 million compared to $36.6 million during the six periods ended September 14, 2008, an increase of $0.4 million or 1.1%. We have increased ad pages in some of our existing markets and grown our sales of online products. Black’s Guide revenue decreased by $0.6 million or 40.0% from $1.5 million in the six periods ended September 14, 2008 to $0.9 million during the six periods ended September 13, 2009 due to the downturn in the commercial real estate market.

Table of Contents

~~Our remodeling~~ Selling, general and administrative ~~home improvement area produced revenue of $8~~expenses.5 SG&A ~~million~~expenses infor the ~~six~~nine periods ended ~~September~~December 136, 2009 were $14.6 million compared to $1315.92 million ~~during~~ for the ~~six~~ nine periods ended ~~September~~December 147, 2008, which was a decrease of $50.46 million or 383.89%. ~~The~~Labor ~~decrease~~and ~~was~~related ~~the~~expenses ~~result of advertisers reducing their marketing expenditures~~ in ~~response to~~ the ~~continued~~nine ~~weak~~periods ~~conditions~~ended ~~in the job~~December ~~market~~6, ~~falling~~2009 ~~home~~was ~~prices~~$7.4 ~~and~~million, ~~reduced~~a ~~availability~~decrease of ~~consumer credit~~$0. ~~Our~~3 ~~publications~~million, inor ~~this~~3.9%, ~~area~~from ~~include:~~$7.7 ~~Kansas City Homes & Gardens, At~~million ~~Home~~during Inthe ~~Arkansas,~~same ~~Relocating~~period in ~~Las~~fiscal ~~Vegas,~~year ~~New~~2009. The ~~England~~decrease ~~Home,~~reflects ~~Relocating~~a reduction in Stheadcount. ~~Louis, regional home improvement magazines, and the Homes & Lifestyles magazines.~~

~~Cost~~Nonproduction ~~of sales. Cost~~depreciation ~~of sales for the six periods ended September 13,~~and ~~2009~~software ~~was~~amortization ~~$48.4 million, a decrease of $15.8 million, or 24.6%, from $64.2 million during the six periods ended September 14, 2008. Labor~~ expense~~, which is our largest cost component, was $21~~.~~0 million in the six periods ended September 13, 2009 compared to $27.6 million during the six periods ended September 14, 2008, a decrease of $6.6 million, or 23.9%.~~ ~~The~~Nonproduction ~~decrease~~depreciation ~~reflects a reduction in~~and ~~headcount. Total~~software ~~commission~~amortization ~~and bonus~~ expense ~~decreased~~increased by $10.~~4 million or 25.5% from $5.5 million in the six periods ended September 14, 2008 to $4.~~1 million ~~during the six periods ended September 13, 2009 due to our revenue decline. Paper expense decreased by $2.3 million~~ or 277.7%, from $81.3 million in the ~~six~~nine periods ended ~~September~~December 147, 2008 to $61.04 million in the ~~six~~ nine periods ended ~~September~~December 136, 2009. The ~~decrease~~increase was ~~related to lower ad page volumes and more favorable paper prices. Our outsource production expense for~~ the ~~six periods ended September 13, 2009 was $2.7 million, a decrease of $1.1 million or 28.9% from the six periods ended September 14, 2008 expense of $3.8 million as a~~ result of ~~bringing outsourced~~ ~~books~~equipment ~~back in-house~~ and ~~lower~~software ~~page~~purchased ~~volume. Distribution~~during ~~expense decreased in~~ the ~~first~~prior ~~and~~four ~~second~~fiscal quarters ofpartially offset ~~fiscal year 2010~~ by ~~approximately $1.8~~software ~~million~~assets orbeing ~~32.7%~~fully ~~compared~~depreciated toduring the same ~~period in the prior year as we~~ ~~reduced our spend with third party distribution companies and re-negotiated rates on our retail distribution contracts~~period. The expense of our E-business and online operations decreased by $1.3 million or 40.6% from $3.2 million in the six periods ended September 14, 2008 to $1.9 million in the six periods ended September 13, 2009. We achieved savings by restructuring operations while increasing our online distribution investment.

~~Production~~Amortization ~~depreciation and software~~of ~~amortization expense~~intangibles. ~~Production~~Amortization ~~depreciation~~expense ~~and~~was ~~software amortization~~$10.5 ~~expense~~million in the nine ~~six~~ periods ended ~~September~~December 136, 2009 ~~was $2.6 million. This was an increase of $0.2 million~~, ~~or 8.3%,~~ compared to $212.40 million for the ~~six~~ nine periods ended ~~September~~December 147, 2008~~. The increase~~, ~~was~~a ~~the~~decrease ~~result~~ of ~~equipment~~$1.5 ~~and~~million ~~software~~or 12.5%. The ~~purchased~~decrease ~~during~~in ~~the~~amortization ~~last~~expense ~~two quarters~~was ofrelated ~~fiscal~~to ~~year~~intangible assets ~~2009~~being ~~and~~fully ~~the~~depreciated ~~first~~during ~~and~~the ~~second~~prior ~~quarters~~four of fiscal ~~year~~ ~~2010~~quarters.

~~Selling,~~Impairment ~~general~~loss. ~~and~~As ~~administrative~~of ~~expenses~~December ~~(“SG&A”). SG&A~~7, ~~expenses~~2008, ~~for~~we ~~the~~performed ~~six~~an ~~periods ended~~assessment ~~September~~of ~~13,~~goodwill ~~2009~~for ~~were~~impairment ~~$9.5~~under the ~~million~~authoritative ~~compared~~guidance tofor ~~$10~~goodwill.5 ~~million~~We ~~for~~completed step one of the ~~six~~analysis ~~periods~~which ~~ended~~resulted ~~September~~in ~~14,~~a ~~2008,~~potential ~~which~~impairment ~~was~~of agoodwill ~~decrease~~for ofthe ~~$1.0~~Resale ~~million~~and orNew ~~9.5%. Labor~~Sales unit and ~~related~~the ~~expenses~~Remodeling inand ~~the~~Home ~~six~~Improvement ~~periods~~unit. ~~ended~~Therefore, ~~September~~we recorded ~~13,~~a ~~2009~~noncash ~~was~~estimated ~~$5.0~~impairment ~~million,~~loss ain ~~decrease~~the amount of $085.4 million, orin the third quarter ended December 7~~.4%~~, ~~from $5~~2008.~~4 million~~ ~~during~~Step ~~the~~two ~~same~~was ~~period~~completed in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009 and resulted in an additional $34. ~~The~~1 ~~decrease~~million recorded in the ~~reflects~~fourth aquarter ~~reduction~~of infiscal ~~headcount~~year 2009.

~~Nonproduction~~Net ~~depreciation and~~interest ~~software amortization~~ expense. ~~Nonproduction~~Net ~~depreciation~~interest ~~and software~~expense ~~amortization~~for ~~expense~~the ~~increased~~nine byperiods ~~$0.1~~ended December ~~million~~6, or2009 12was $19.5%7 ~~from~~million, compared to $020.8 0 million in the nine ~~six~~ periods ended ~~September~~December 147, 2008. The todecrease of $0.93 million inor 1.5% ~~the~~reflected ~~six periods~~a ~~ended~~lower ~~September~~debt ~~13,~~balance ~~2009. The~~and ~~increase~~lower ~~was~~interest ~~the~~rates ~~result~~on ofour new senior ~~equipment~~term ~~and~~loan ~~software~~facility ~~purchased~~partially ~~during~~offset by the ~~last~~write ~~two~~off ~~quarters~~ of ~~fiscal~~deferred ~~year~~financing costs in connection with the amendment of May 4, 2009 ~~and~~of the ~~first~~new revolving agreement and ~~second~~a ~~quarters~~higher ofbalance ~~fiscal~~on ~~year~~our ~~2010~~senior subordinated note.

~~Amortization~~Net ~~of intangibles~~loss. ~~Amortization~~Due ~~expense~~to the ~~was~~factors set forth above, we reported a net loss of $710.15 million induring the ~~six~~ nine periods ended ~~September~~December 136, 2009, compared to a net loss of $883.05 million during ~~for~~ the ~~six~~nine periods ended ~~September~~December 147, 2008,. The asignificant change ~~decrease~~in ofour ~~$0.9~~operating ~~million~~results orfor ~~11.3%. The~~the nine periods ended December 7, 2008 ~~decrease~~compared to the same period in ~~amortization~~the ~~expense~~current fiscal year was related to ~~intangible~~the noncash ~~assets~~estimated ~~being~~impairment ~~fully depreciated~~loss ~~during~~of ~~the~~$85.4 million ~~last~~that ~~two~~was ~~quarters~~recorded in the third quarter of fiscal year 2009, ~~and~~pursuant ~~first~~to ~~and second~~our ~~quarters~~conducting step one of ~~fiscal~~the analysis ~~year~~of ~~2010~~goodwill for impairment as of December 7, 2008.

~~Net interest~~Liquidity expense. Net interest expense for the six periods ended September 13, 2009 was $13.3 million, flat compared to the six periods ended September 14, 2008. Interest expense for the six periods ended September 13, 2009 reflected a lower debt balance and ~~lower~~Capital interest rates on our new senior term loan facility offset by the write off of deferred financing costs in connection with the amendment of May 4, 2009 of the new revolving agreement and a higher balance on our senior subordinated note.Resources

Historically, our primary source of liquidity has been cash flow from operations. We also have the ability to incur indebtedness under our new revolving loan facility. At December 6, 2009, our cash on hand was $3.0 million compared to $2.6 million and $3.4 million at March 29, 2009 and December 7, 2008, respectively.

The following table summarizes our net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents as of December 6, 2009 and December 7, 2008:

	Nine Periods Ended
	December 6, 2009			December 7, 2008
(Dollars in thousands)

Net cash provided by operating activities	$	1,044		$	4,122
Net cash used in investing activities		(3,995	)		(5,594	)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		3,410			(1,860	)
Net increase (decrease) in cash		459			(3,332	)
Cash at beginning of fiscal year		2,585			6,716
Cash at end of period	$	3,044		$	3,384

Table of Contents

~~Net~~Our ~~loss. Due to~~net cash provided by operating activities in the ~~factors~~nine ~~set~~periods ~~forth~~ended ~~above~~December 6, we2009 was ~~reported~~$1.0 amillion ~~net~~compared ~~loss~~to of $64.71 million ~~during~~in the ~~six~~ nine periods ended ~~September~~December 137, ~~2009~~ 2008, ~~compared to~~ a ~~net~~decrease ~~loss~~ of $23.71 million ~~during~~. ~~the~~The ~~six~~decrease ~~periods~~was ~~ended~~due ~~September~~to ~~14,~~the ~~2008~~decline in our operating income.

~~Liquidity~~During the nine periods ended December 6, 2009, net cash used in investing activities was $4.0 million, mainly spent on the purchase of property, equipment and software. During ~~Capital~~the ~~Resources~~nine periods ended December 7, 2008, net cash used in investing activities was $5.6 million consisting of $4.3 million for the purchase of property, equipment and software, and $1.3 million for earn-out payments related to acquisitions completed in fiscal year 2008.

~~Historically~~For the nine periods ended December 6, 2009, the net cash provided by financing ~~our~~activities ~~primary~~was ~~source~~$3.4 million versus a use of ~~liquidity~~$1.9 ~~has~~million ~~been~~for ~~cash~~the ~~flow~~nine ~~from~~periods ~~operations~~ended December 7, 2008. WeThe ~~also~~cash ~~have~~provided in the ~~ability~~nine toperiods ~~incur~~ended December ~~indebtedness~~6, ~~under~~2009 was a result of the $6.0 million drawn on our new ~~senior~~revolving loan ~~secured~~facility ~~revolving~~in the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 partially offset by a payment of $1.6 million related to the excess cash flow payment made on our new term loan facility. Atin ~~September~~the ~~13,~~second ~~2009~~quarter of fiscal year 2010, scheduled installments on our ~~cash~~new onterm loan facility and payments for capital leases and ~~hand~~debt ~~was~~issuance $2costs.2 The ~~million~~cash ~~compared~~used in the nine periods ended December 7, 2008 was mainly related to the excess cash flow payment of $25.60 million ~~and~~made on our new term loan facility in the second quarter of fiscal year 2009, partially offset by $54.50 million atdrawn ~~March~~on ~~29,~~the new revolving loan facility in ~~2009~~addition ~~and~~to ~~September~~the ~~14,~~scheduled ~~2008,~~installments ~~respectively~~on our new term loan facility and payments for capital leases.

The following table summarizes our net decrease in cash and cash equivalents as of September 13, 2009 and September 14, 2008:

	Six Periods Ended
	September 13, 2009			September 14, 2008
(Dollars in thousands)
Net cash provided by operating activities	$	4,581		$	8,491
Net cash used in investing activities		(2,621	)		(4,186	)
Net cash used in financing activities		(2,298	)		(5,568	)
Net decrease in cash		(338	)		(1,263	)
Cash at beginning of fiscal year		2,585			6,716
Cash at end of period	$	2,247		$	5,453

Our net cash provided by operating activities in the six periods ended September 13, 2009 was $4.6 million compared to $8.5 million in the six periods ended September 14, 2008, a decrease of $3.9 million. The decrease was primarily due to the decline in our operating income.

During the six periods ended September 13, 2009, net cash used in investing activities was $2.6 million spent on the purchase of property, equipment and software. During the six periods ended September 14, 2008, net cash used in investing activities was $4.2 million consisting of $2.9 million for the purchase of property, equipment and software, and $1.3 million for earn-out payments related to acquisitions completed in fiscal year 2008.

For the six periods ended September 13, 2009, the net cash used in financing activities was $2.3 million versus a use of $5.6 million for the six periods ended September 14, 2008. The cash used in the six periods ended September 13, 2009 and September 14, 2008 were mainly related to the excess cash flow payments of $1.6 million and $5.0 million made on our new term loan facility in the second quarter of fiscal years 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Senior Notes and Credit Agreement

We intend to fund ongoing operations through cash generated by operations and borrowings under our revolving loan facility. On November 30, 2005, ~~the Company~~we refinanced ~~its~~our capital structure. The objective of the refinancing was to provide ~~the~~us ~~Company~~ with a long-term capital structure that was consistent with ~~its~~ our strategy and to preserve acquisition flexibility. The refinancing was ~~completed~~ completed through an offering of $175.0 million of Senior Notes and a senior ~~secured~~ secured credit facility.

The Senior Notes will mature in December 2013. Interest is payable semi-annually. The notes will be redeemable in the circumstances and at the redemption prices described in the Senior Notes indenture. The indenture governing the notes also contains numerous covenants including, among other things, restrictions on our ability to: incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue disqualified or preferred stock; pay dividends or make other equity distributions; repurchase or redeem capital stock; make investments or other restricted payments; sell assets or consolidate or merge with or into other companies; incur liens; enter into sale/leaseback transactions; create limitations on the ability of our restricted subsidiaries to make dividends or distributions to us; and engage in transactions with affiliates.

New senior credit facility. On July 20, 2007, we entered into a senior secured term loan facility (the “new term loan facility”) for an aggregate principal amount of $76.6 million and a senior secured revolving loan facility (the “new revolving loan facility”) for an amount up to $35.0 million (the new term loan facility together with the new revolving loan facility, the “new credit facility”). The proceeds of the new credit facility were used to repay all amounts outstanding under the existing credit facility (dated as of November 30, 2005) and fund acquisitions completed during the third quarter of fiscal year 2008. In connection with the new credit facility, the Company recorded $0.5 million of deferred charges during the third quarter of fiscal year 2008 for transaction fees and other related debt issuance costs. Additionally, approximately $3.7 million of debt issuance costs associated with the extinguishment of the existing term loan facility were written off and charged to interest expense during the third quarter of fiscal year 2008.

On June 10, 2008, we entered into an amendment of the new revolving loan facility. The amendment adjusted the interest coverage ratios over the term of the new revolving loan facility.

Table of Contents

New senior credit facility. On July 20, 2007, we entered into a senior secured term loan facility (the “new term loan facility”) for an aggregate principal amount of $76.6 million and a senior secured revolving loan facility (the “new revolving loan facility”) for an amount up to $35.0 million (the new term loan facility together with the new revolving loan facility, the “new credit facility”). The proceeds of the new loan were used to repay all amounts outstanding under the existing credit facility (dated as of November 30, 2005) and fund acquisitions completed during the Company’s second quarter of fiscal year 2008. In connection with the new credit facility, the Company recorded $0.5 million of deferred charges during the second quarter of fiscal year 2008 for transaction fees and other related debt issuance costs. Additionally, approximately $3.7 million of debt issuance costs associated with the extinguishment of the existing term loan facility were written off and charged to interest expense during the second quarter of fiscal year 2008.

On June 10, 2008 we entered into an amendment of the new revolving loan facility. The amendment adjusted the interest coverage ratios over the term of the new revolving loan facility.

On December 4, 2008, we amended the new revolving loan facility dated July 20, 2007. The amendment reduced the amount payable to employees and other individuals in connection with the repurchase of equity interests held by such individuals or upon the termination of employment of an individual in connection with the repurchase of stock appreciation rights or other similar interests, adjusted the interest coverage ratio and the senior secured leverage ratio and eliminated our ability to carry forward any unused permitted investments in respect of unrestricted subsidiaries.

On May 4, 2009, we amended the new revolving loan facility dated July 20, 2007 (“the amended revolving loan facility”). The amendment restated the applicable percentage as defined in the revolving credit agreement, increased the commitment fee from 0.50% to 0.75%, decreased the revolving credit commitment from $35.0 million to $15.0 million, decreased the permitted annual capital expenditures from $10.0 million to $6.0 million, and adjusted the interest coverage ratio and the senior secured coverage ratio on the revolving facility. In connection with the amendment, we wrote off $0.2 million for debt issuance costs associated with the prior revolving facility dated July 20, 2007 and recorded $0.2 million for debt issuance costs associated with the new amended facility ofin ~~which~~the ~~$0.1~~first ~~million~~quarter ~~was~~for ~~paid~~fiscal asyear ~~of September 13, 2009~~2010.

Our new term loan facility matures in November 2012. Additionally, we have the ability to obtain up to $75.0 million under our incremental term loan subject to compliance with our affirmative and negative covenants. Borrowings are also available under our amended revolving loan facility maturing in November 2010.

Borrowings under our new credit facility bear interest, at our option, at either adjusted LIBOR plus an applicable margin or the alternate base rate plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin with respect to borrowings under our amended revolving loan facility is subject to adjustments based upon a leverage-based pricing grid. Our amended revolving credit facility requires us to meet maximum leverage ratios and minimum interest coverage ratios and includes a maximum annual capital expenditures limitation. In addition, the amended revolving credit facility contains certain restrictive covenants which, among other things, limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends, incur liens, prepay subordinated debt, make loans and investments, merge or consolidate, sell assets, change our business, amend the terms of our subordinated debt and engage in certain other activities customarily restricted in such agreements. It also contains certain customary events of defaults, subject to grace periods, as appropriate. As of ~~September~~December 136, 2009, ~~the~~we ~~Company~~were ~~was~~ in compliance with all debt covenant requirements. In addition to providing fixed principal ~~payment~~ payment schedules for the new credit facility, the loan agreement also includes an an Excess Cash Flow Repayment provision that requires repayment of principal ~~based~~ based on the Company’s leverage ratio, EBITDA, working capital, debt service and ~~tax~~ tax payments. The Excess Cash Flow amount is calculated and paid annually with ~~the~~ the repayment of principal allocated on a pro rata basis to the term and ~~revolving~~ revolving loans. Based on the Company’s financial results for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2009, ~~the~~we ~~Company~~ made a payment of $1.6 million on June 29, 2009 under the Excess Cash Flow Repayment Provision of the new credit facility. Accordingly, the liability was included in the current maturities on long-term debt as of March 29, 2009. ~~The~~We ~~Company~~are is also required to pay an annual ~~non-utilization~~ commitment fee equal to 0.75% of the unused portion of the new revolving ~~credit~~ loan facility.

Our ability to make scheduled payments of principal, or to pay the interest or additional interest, if any, on, or to refinance our indebtedness, or to fund planned capital expenditures will depend on our future performance, which, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. Based upon the current level of operations, we believe that cash flow from operations and available cash, together with borrowings available under our new credit facility, will be adequate to meet our future liquidity needs through November 29, 2010. In addition, based on our current forecast assumptions, we expect to be able to satisfy our debt covenants through November 29, 2010. Our assumptions with respect to future costs may not be correct, and funds available to us from the sources discussed above may not be sufficient to enable us to service our indebtedness, including the senior notes, or cover any shortfall in funding for any unanticipated expenses. We may not be able to renew or refinance our new revolving loan facility before it matures on November 30, 2010. In addition, to the extent we make future acquisitions, we may require new sources of funding including additional debt, equity financing or some combination thereof. We may not be able to secure additional sources of funding on favorable terms.

Table of Contents

Our ability to make scheduled payments of principal, or to pay the interest or additional interest, if any, on, or to refinance our indebtedness, or to fund planned capital expenditures will depend on our future performance, which, to a certain extent, is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our control. Based upon the current level of operations, we believe that cash flow from operations and available cash, together with borrowings available under our new credit facility, will be adequate to meet our future liquidity needs through September 12, 2010. Our assumptions with respect to future costs may not be correct, and funds available to us from the sources discussed above may not be sufficient to enable us to service our indebtedness, including the Senior Notes, or cover any shortfall in funding for any unanticipated expenses. In addition, to the extent we make future acquisitions, we may require new sources of funding including additional debt, equity financing or some combination thereof. We may not be able to secure additional sources of funding on favorable terms.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reflected in the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates on historical experience, where applicable and other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from those estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

Principles of Consolidation and Fiscal Year End

We and our consolidated entities report on a 52-53 week accounting year. The condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report include our consolidated financial statements ~~and our wholly-owned subsidiaries~~ for the three periods and ~~six~~ nine periods ended ~~September~~December 136, 2009 and ~~September~~December 147, 2008, respectively and the fiscal year ended March 29, 2009. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Revenue Recognition and Unearned Revenue

Our principal revenue earning activity of the Company is related to the sale of online and print advertising. Revenue recognition for print and online products are consistently applied within Company-managed (Direct) and ID-managed distribution territories as described below. These revenue arrangements are typically sold as a bundled product to customers and include a print ad in a publication as well as online advertisement. ~~The Company~~We ~~bills~~ bill the customer a single negotiated price for both elements. In accordance with ~~EITF~~the ~~00-21,~~authoritative ~~“Accounting~~guidance for ~~Revenue~~accounting ~~Arrangements~~for revenue arrangements with ~~Multiple~~multiple ~~Deliverables”~~deliverables, the Company separates its deliverables into units of accounting and allocates consideration to each unit based on relative fair values. The Company recognizes revenue for each unit of accounting in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Number 104, “Revenue Recognition”.

Print revenues are derived from sale of advertising pages in our publications. We sell a bundled product to our customers that includes a print advertisement as well as a standard online advertisement. The customer can also purchase premium placement advertising pages such as front cover and back cover. Revenue for print advertisement sales, including the premium placement advertising pages, is recognized when the publications are delivered and available for consumer access.

Online

Online revenues are derived from the sale of advertising on our various websites. We sell a bundled product to our customers that includes a print advertisement in our publications as well as a standard online advertisement. The customer is permitted to purchase premium online advertisements whereby it can include additional data items such as floor plans, multiple photos and neighborhood information, and also secure premium placement in search results. In addition, we have started selling an online only product to our customers. Revenue for online sales, including the premium online advertisements, is recognized ratably over the period the online advertisements are maintained on the website.

Table of Contents

Unearned revenue

We have historically billed our customers a few days before shipment. At both interim and fiscal year end, we reverse the revenue and the pre-billings completed to properly account for the timing differences and properly recognize revenue in the proper period. Prepaid orders are recorded in unearned revenue if pre-billed. Prepaid subscriptions are recorded as unearned revenue when received and recognized as revenue over the term of the subscription.

Trade Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable consist primarily of amounts due from advertisers in our operated markets and independent distributors.

Table of Contents

We grant credit without collateral to many of our customers. Substantially all trade accounts receivable are comprised of accounts related to advertising displayed in our various real estate publications. Management believes credit risk with respect to those receivables is limited due to the large number of customers and their dispersion across geographic areas, as well as the distribution of those receivables among our various publication products.

We use the allowance method of reserving for accounts receivable estimated to be uncollectible. The allowance is calculated by applying a risk factor to each aging category.

Customer Deposits

We receive cash deposits from customers for certain publications prior to printing and/or upload of online advertising. These deposits are recorded as a liability and reflected accordingly in the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Goodwill

As a ~~disclosed~~result of continued declines in our ~~Annual~~consolidated ~~Report~~operating onincome ~~Form~~during ~~10-K~~the first, ~~for~~second ~~the~~and third quarters of fiscal year ~~ended~~2009 ~~March~~in 29our only reportable segment, the publishing segment, in addition to the fair market value during ~~2009~~that period of our outstanding debt, we determined that we had a triggering event under ~~SFAS~~the ~~No.~~authoritative ~~142~~guidance infor ~~the~~goodwill ~~third~~and ~~quarter~~performed, as of ~~fiscal~~December 7, ~~year~~2008, ~~2009. As~~an aassessment ~~result,~~of wegoodwill ~~performed~~for an impairment ~~test~~on all of ~~our~~the ~~goodwill~~our ~~and~~reporting ~~indefinite-lived~~units ~~intangible~~using ~~assets~~the ~~under~~discounted ~~SFAS~~cash ~~142~~flow ~~and~~approach. ~~recorded~~The discounted cash ~~during~~flow ~~the~~approach ~~third~~was ~~and~~the ~~fourth~~same ~~quarters~~approach ofused in fiscal year ~~2009~~2008. aThe ~~total~~discount ~~impairment loss~~rate ofwas ~~$119.5~~adjusted ~~million~~from 11.7% ~~For~~in ~~further~~the ~~details,~~analysis ~~refer~~performed in fiscal year 2008 to ~~our~~12.5% in ~~Annual~~the ~~Report~~third onquarter ~~Form~~of ~~10-K~~fiscal year 2009 analysis. These assumptions were based ~~for~~on the economic environment and credit market conditions during the fiscal year 2009. ~~filed~~Our ~~with~~reporting units are the ~~SEC~~Resale onand ~~June~~New 19Sales unit, ~~2009~~the Rental and Leasing unit and the Remodeling and Home Improvement unit.

WeBased ~~did~~on the results of our assessment of goodwill for impairment, we determined that the carrying values of the Resale and New Sales unit and the Remodeling and Home Improvement unit exceeded their estimated fair value. As a result, we initiated step two of the analysis for the Resale and New Sales and the Remodeling and Home Improvement units. Also, we determined that the carrying value of the Rental and Leasing unit did not ~~recognize~~exceed ~~any~~its estimated fair value. As a result, no further testing was required and no impairment ~~loss~~of ~~during~~goodwill was identified for the ~~six~~Rental ~~periods~~and ~~ended~~Leasing unit. As of December 7, 2008, the ~~September~~carrying amounts of goodwill associated with the Resale and New Sales unit, the Rental and Leasing unit and the Remodeling and Home Improvement unit were $194.6 13million, $94.5 ~~2009~~million and ~~September~~$18.7 14million, respectively. The second step was not completed in the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 and as a result, we recorded an estimated noncash impairment charge based on a preliminary assessment in the amount of $85.4 million in our statements of operations for the three periods and nine periods ended December 7, 2008. The amounts of the estimated recorded impairment charges for the Resale and New Sales unit and the Remodeling and Home Improvement unit were $74.0 million and $11.4 million, respectively. Step two was completed in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009 and resulted in an additional $34.1 million recorded in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009. The impairment loss related primarily to the deteriorating global economic conditions and the downturn in the resale and new home markets. A change in the economic conditions or other circumstances influencing the estimate of future cash flows or fair value could result in future impairment charges of goodwill or intangible assets with indefinite lives.

As of December 7, 2008, we had one intangible asset with an indefinite life. We determined that this asset which is a trademark was not impaired as of December 7, 2008.

In addition, we did not recognize any impairment loss during the nine periods ended December 6, 2009.

Table of Contents

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We assess the recoverability of long-lived assets in accordance with ~~SFAS~~the ~~No. 144,~~authoritative ~~Accounting~~guidance for accounting for the ~~Impairment~~ impairment or ~~Disposal~~disposal of ~~Long~~long-~~Lived~~lived ~~Assets~~assets, whenever adverse events or changes in circumstances indicate that impairment may have occurred. If the future, undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the related assets are less than the carrying value of such assets, an impairment has been incurred and a loss is recognized to reduce the carrying value of the long-lived assets to fair value, which is determined by discounting estimated future cash flows. ~~The~~We ~~Company~~ did not recognize any impairment loss related to long-lived assets in any of the periods presented in this report.


	Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of the values assigned to consumer databases, independent distributor agreements, advertising lists, subscriber lists, trade names, trademarks, and other intangible assets. Amortization of intangible assets is provided utilizing the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives. We have one intangible asset, which is a trademark, that has an indefinite life.

Table of Contents

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2009, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ~~Statement~~the ofauthoritative ~~Financial~~guidance ~~Accounting~~for ~~Standard~~subsequent ~~(“SFAS”) No~~events. ~~165, Subsequent Events (“SFAS 165”).~~ This ~~Statement~~guidance establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. It requires the disclosure of the date through which an entity has evaluated subsequent events and whether that evaluation date is the date of issuance or the date the financial statements were available to be issued. This ~~Statement~~guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and as such, we adopted this standard in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and the adoption had no impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In April 2009, the FASB issued ~~FASB~~a staff position ~~(“FSP”)~~which ~~FAS 107-1, “Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments” (“FSP 107-1”). The staff position~~ increases the frequency of the disclosures related to the fair value of financial instruments required by public entities to a quarterly basis rather than just annually. The ~~quarterly~~ quarterly disclosures are intended to provide financial statement users with more timely information about the effects of current market conditions on an entity’s financial instruments that are not otherwise reported at fair value. ~~FSP~~ ~~107-1~~The staff position is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, with early adoption permitted in certain circumstances for periods ending ~~after~~ after March 15, 2009. We adopted ~~FSP~~the ~~107-1~~staff position in the first quarter of fiscal ~~year~~ year 2010 and the adoption had no impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In April 2008, the FASB issued ~~FSP~~a ~~FAS~~staff ~~142-3,~~position ~~Determination~~which ofamended the ~~Useful Life of Intangible Assets (“FSP 142-3”). FSP 142-3 amends the~~ factors an entity should consider in developing renewal or extension assumptions used in determining the useful life of recognized intangible assets under ~~SFAS 142,~~the ~~“Goodwill~~authoritative guidance for goodwill and ~~Other~~other ~~Intangible Assets”.~~intangible assets. The new guidance applies prospectively to intangible assets that are acquired individually or with a group of other assets in business combinations and asset acquisitions. ~~FSP~~and ~~142-3~~ is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2008. ~~Early adoption is prohibited.~~ We adopted ~~FSP~~the ~~142-3~~staff position in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and the adoption had no ~~material~~ material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cashflows.

In March 2008, the FASB issued ~~SFAS~~the ~~No.~~authoritative ~~161,~~guidance ~~“Disclosures~~for ~~about~~the ~~Derivative~~disclosures about derivative Instruments and ~~Hedging~~hedging ~~Activities” (“SFAS 161”)~~activities, which amends the ~~disclosure~~ disclosure requirements ~~of SFAS 133 “Accounting~~ for ~~Derivative Instruments~~derivative instruments and ~~Hedging~~hedging ~~Activities”~~activities. The guidance ~~SFAS 161~~ provides an enhanced understanding about how and why derivative instruments are used, how they are accounted for and their effect on an entity’s financial position, performance and cash flows. ~~SFAS~~The ~~161~~guidance, which is effective for the first interim period beginning after November 15, 2008, requires additional disclosure in future filings. We adopted this standard in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009 and the adoption did not have any material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an Amendment of ARB No. 51 (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 amends ARB No. 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. SFAS 160 also clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008 and as such, we adopted this standard in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and the adoption did not have any material impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(revised 2007), Business Combinations (“SFAS 141R”). SFAS 141R will significantly change the accounting for business combinations in a number of areas including the treatment of contingent consideration, contingencies, acquisition costs, IPR&D and restructuring costs. In addition, under SFAS 141R, changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties in a business combination after the measurement period will impact income taxes. SFAS 141R is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008 and, as such, we adopted this standard in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010. The provisions are effective for us for business combinations on or after March 30, 2009.

Table of Contents

~~Effective~~In ~~March~~December ~~26,~~ 2007, wethe ~~adopted~~ FASB ~~Interpretation~~issued ~~No. 48,~~the ~~Accounting~~authoritative guidance for ~~Uncertainty in Income~~the ~~Taxes—an~~noncontrolling ~~Interpretation~~interests ofin ~~FASB~~consolidated ~~Statement~~financial ~~109 (“FIN 48”)~~statements. ~~FIN 48 requires~~ The ~~that~~guidance aestablishes ~~position~~accounting ~~taken~~and orreporting ~~expected~~standards tofor bethe ~~taken~~noncontrolling interest in a ~~tax~~subsidiary ~~return~~and befor ~~recognized in~~ the ~~financial~~deconsolidation ~~statements~~of ~~when~~a ~~it is more likely than not (i~~subsidiary.e. aIt ~~likelihood of~~also ~~more~~clarifies ~~than~~that ~~fifty~~a ~~percent)~~noncontrolling ~~that~~interest ~~the~~in ~~position~~a ~~would~~subsidiary beis ~~sustained~~an ~~upon examination~~ownership byinterest ~~tax~~in ~~authorities.~~the Aconsolidated ~~recognized~~entity ~~tax~~that ~~position~~should isbe ~~then~~reported ~~measured~~as atequity ~~the~~in ~~largest~~the ~~amount~~consolidated offinancial ~~benefit~~statements. ~~that~~The guidance is ~~greater~~effective ~~than~~for ~~fifty~~fiscal ~~percent~~years beginning ~~likely~~on ofor ~~being~~after ~~realized upon~~December 15, ~~ultimate~~2008 ~~settlements.~~and ~~Upon~~as ~~adoption~~such, we ~~did~~adopted ~~not have any material uncertain~~this ~~tax~~standard ~~positions~~in tothe ~~account~~first ~~for~~quarter asof anfiscal ~~adjustment~~year to2010 ~~our~~and ~~opening~~the ~~balance~~adoption ofhad ~~retained earnings~~no impact on ~~March 26,~~our ~~2007.~~financial ~~In addition~~position, asresults of ~~September 13~~operations, ~~2009~~or ~~and~~cash ~~March 29, 2009, we did not have any material unrecognized tax benefits~~flows.

In ~~February~~ December 2007, the FASB issued ~~SFAS~~the ~~No. 159,~~authoritative ~~“The~~guidance ~~Fair Value Option~~ for ~~Financial~~business ~~Assets~~combinations ~~and~~which ~~Financial~~changed ~~Liabilities~~significantly —the ~~Including~~accounting anfor ~~Amendment of FASB Statement~~business ~~No. 115”~~combinations ~~(“SFAS~~in ~~159”).~~a ~~SFAS~~number ~~159~~of ~~permits~~areas ~~entities~~including tothe ~~choose~~treatment toof contingent ~~measure~~consideration, ~~many~~contingencies, ~~financial~~acquisition ~~instruments~~costs, IPR&D and ~~certain other items at fair value~~restructuring costs. ~~This provides~~In ~~entities~~addition, ~~with~~under the ~~opportunity~~guidance, tochanges ~~mitigate~~in ~~volatility~~deferred intax ~~reported~~asset valuation ~~earnings~~allowances ~~caused~~and byacquired ~~measuring~~income ~~related~~tax ~~assets~~uncertainties ~~and~~in ~~liabilities~~a ~~differently~~business ~~without~~combination after ~~being~~the ~~required~~measurement toperiod ~~apply~~will ~~complex~~impact ~~hedge~~income ~~accounting provisions~~taxes. The ~~provisions~~guidance ~~of SFAS~~is ~~159 are~~ effective ~~as of the beginning of~~ for fiscal years ~~that~~beginning ~~start~~ after ~~November~~ December 15, ~~2007. We~~2008 ~~have~~and, ~~adopted~~as ~~SFAS~~such, ~~159~~we onadopted this ~~March~~standard ~~31,~~in ~~2008 and~~ the ~~adoption~~first ~~did~~quarter ~~not~~of ~~have~~fiscal ~~any~~year ~~impact~~2010. The provisions onare ~~our~~effective ~~financial~~for ~~position,~~us ~~results~~for ~~of operations,~~business combinations on or ~~cash~~after ~~flows~~March 30, 2009.

In September 2006, the FASB issued ~~SFAS~~the ~~No.~~authoritative ~~157,~~guidance ~~Fair~~for ~~Value~~fair ~~Measurements(~~value ~~“SFAS~~measurements ~~157”).~~which ~~SFAS 157~~ defines fair value, establishes a framework for ~~measuring~~ measuring fair value under generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. ~~SFAS~~The ~~157~~guidance emphasizes ~~that~~ that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement, and states that a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. ~~SFAS~~The ~~157~~guidance applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.

~~SFAS~~The ~~157,~~fair value measurement guidance, among other things, requires companies to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value, and specifies a hierarchy of valuation techniques based on whether the inputs to those valuation techniques are observable or unobservable. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect the company’s market assumptions. The effective date is for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007.

~~SFAS 157~~The guidance establishes a three-tiered hierarchy to prioritize inputs used to measure fair value. Those tiers are defined as follows:

-	Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the reporting entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

-	Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

The highest priority in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value is placed on the use of Level 1 inputs, while the lowest priority is placed on the use of Level 3 inputs.

This ~~statement~~guidance also expands the related disclosure requirements in an effort to provide greater transparency around fair value measures.

At March 31, 2008, we adopted ~~SFAS~~the ~~157~~guidance and the adoption had no material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In February 2008, the FASB ~~issued~~amended ~~FSP~~the ~~FAS~~guidance ~~157-2,~~to ~~which~~delay ~~delays~~its ~~the~~ effective date ~~of SFAS 157~~ to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal years, for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the ~~financial~~ financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). We adopted ~~FSP~~the amendment ~~FAS 157-2~~ in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010 and the adoption had no material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

At ~~September~~December 136, 2009, we did not have any relationships with unconsolidated ~~entities~~ entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as ~~structured~~ structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes.

Contractual Obligations

For a discussion of our contractual obligations, see the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources – Contractual Obligations” section in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2009. There have been no material developments with respect to contractual obligations since March 29, 2009.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

For a discussion of certain of the market risks to which we are exposed, see the “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” section in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2009. There have been no material changes with respect to quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk since March 29, 2009.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

As of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our management performed an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ~~(the Exchange Act~~)). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have identified the material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting discussed below and as a result, have concluded that, as of the end of the quarterly period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of ~~September 13~~ December 6, 2009.

Based on the evaluation performed by management under the supervision and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act), our ~~management~~ management identified the following material weaknesses in our internal control ~~over~~ over financial reporting as of the quarterly period ended ~~September 13~~ December 6, 2009:

	1.		Deficiencies in our IT environment due to untimely removal of network access for terminated employees.

	2.		Deficiencies in maintaining adequate controls over certain key spreadsheets used in our financial reporting process including review of these spreadsheets.

Since the discovery of the material weaknesses in internal controls described above, management is strengthening the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting and is taking various actions to improve our internal controls including, but not limited to the following:

	1.		Remediation efforts were made to ensure notification of IT upon the departure of employees for purposes of terminating their network access. The Company is currently reviewing the access eligibility of the current users of its network. Testing of these remediation efforts is pending.
	2.		Remediation efforts were made to ensure adequate controls over key spreadsheets by implementing review and password protection on the spreadsheets and formulas and maintaining historic data in a read -only access as well as a formal review process. Testing of these remediation efforts is pending.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Other than the items noted above, there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarterly period ended ~~September 13~~December 6, 2009 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART II – –OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings

From time to time, we are involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business. We are not currently a party to any litigation that management believes, if determined adversely to us, would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Item 1A.	Risk Factors

For a discussion of risk factors, see “Item 1A. – Risk Factors” ~~section~~ in our Annual ~~Report~~ Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2009. There ~~have~~ have been no material changes from the risk factors previously disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 29, 2009.

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.


Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities

None.


Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

None.


Item 5.	Other Information

~~There~~On ~~were~~January no11, ~~disclosures~~2010, the Company amended and restated the employment agreement of December 23, 2004 with Mr. Daniel McCarthy, the Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and its subsidiaries. The term of employment will be five years commencing on December 23, 2009 or less in case of resignation, death, disability or termination by the Company with or without cause. The employment agreement includes a provision that prevents Mr. McCarthy, during the employment period and for a period of two years thereafter from directly or indirectly owning, managing or engaging in any business, ~~information~~or ~~required~~acting as an investor in or lender to beany ~~filed~~business including on ~~Form~~his own ~~8-K~~behalf or on behalf of another person which constitutes or is competitive with the Company during the employment period, or as of the end of the employment period if the ~~quarterly~~employment period ~~covered~~has bythen ~~this~~ended. Mr. McCarthy’s ~~report~~employment agreement provides for base salary of $480,000 per annum (or as otherwise agreed between Mr. McCarthy and the Company) in addition to an annual increase subject to the Board’s approval of such increase. However, Mr. McCarthy has agreed with the Company that ~~were~~his ~~not~~compensation for services shall ~~filed~~remain at his previous compensation level of $434,100 while a pay freeze remains in effect at the Company. Mr. McCarthy shall also receive family health, dental, life, long-term disability, directors and officers liability insurance and such other benefits offered to senior executives of the Company from time to time. In addition, Mr. McCarthy may receive a performance bonus if certain financial performance criteria are met subject to the Board’s approval. In case of termination by the Company without cause, Mr. McCarthy is entitled to receive severance payments in an aggregate amount equal to two years’ salary based on the salary in effect at the time the employment period is terminated, as well as two years of benefits continuation if then available under the Company's benefits plans or COBRA continuation coverage for a period equal to the period such COBRA continuation coverage is available up to two years.

On January 11, 2010, the Company amended and restated the employment agreement of January 7, 2005 with Mr. Gerard Parker, the Chief Financial Officer of the Company and its subsidiaries. The term of employment will be five years commencing on December 23, 2009 or less in case of resignation, death, disability or termination by the Company with or without cause. The employment agreement includes a provision that prevents Mr. Parker, during the Employment Period and for a period of two years thereafter from directly or indirectly owning, managing or engaging in any business, or acting as an investor in or lender to any business including on his own behalf or on behalf of another person which constitutes or is competitive with the Company during the employment period, or as of the end of the employment period if the employment period has then ended. Mr. Parker’s employment agreement provides for base salary of $325,000 (or as otherwise agreed between Mr. Parker and the Company) in addition to an annual increase subject to the Board’s approval of such increase. However, Mr. Parker has agreed with the Company that his compensation for services shall remain at his current compensation level of $289,406 while a pay freeze remains in effect at the Company. Mr. Parker shall also receive family health, dental, life, long-term disability, directors and officers liability insurance and such other benefits offered to senior executives of the Company from time to time. In addition, Mr. Parker may receive a performance bonus if certain financial performance criteria are met subject to the Board’s approval. In case of termination by the Company without cause, Mr. Parker is entitled to receive severance payments in an aggregate amount equal to two years’ salary based on the salary in effect at the time the employment period is terminated, as well as two years of benefits continuation if then available under the Company's benefits plans or to COBRA continuation coverage for a period equal to the period such COBRA continuation coverage is available up to two years.


Item 6.	Exhibit

Exhibits are filed or furnished with this report as set forth in the Exhibits Index hereof.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	Network Communications, Inc.
Date: October 26, 2009	By:	/s/ Daniel R. McCarthy Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: January 15, 2010	By:	/s/ Daniel R. McCarthy Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
Date: October 26, 2009	By:	/s/ Gerard P. Parker Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Date: January 15, 2010	By:	/s/ Gerard P. Parker Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

Table of Contents

NETWORK COMMUNICATIONS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

PART II – –OTHER INFORMATION

Exhibit Index

Number			Title
	10	.29	Amendment to Employment Agreement of Daniel McCarthy.
	10	.30	Amendment to Employment Agreement of Gerard Parker.
	31	.1	Certification of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	31	.2	Certification of the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32	.1*	Certification of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Title 18 of the United States Code Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
	32	.2*	Certification of Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Title 18 of the United States Code Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.


*	This exhibit is hereby furnished to the SEC as an accompanying document and is not to be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 or otherwise subject to the liabilities of that Section, nor shall it be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Filing Compare · Network Communications, Inc.