UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC ~~20369~~20549

FORM 8−K

CURRENT REPORT

PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF ~~THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934~~

~~Date~~THE ofSECURITIES ~~Report~~EXCHANGE ~~August~~ACT ~~25,~~OF ~~2015~~1934

~~CORE~~Date ~~RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC. (Exact name~~ of ~~registrant~~Report asOctober ~~specified~~13, ~~in charter)~~2015

Nevada		000-55010		46-2029981
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)		(Commission File Number)		(IRS Employer Identification No.)

CORE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC.

~~3131~~(Exact E.name ~~Camelback,~~of ~~Suite~~registrant ~~211~~as ~~Phoenix,~~specified AZin ~~85016 (Address of principal executive offices~~charter)

(602) 314-3231 Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Nevada		000-55010		46-2029981
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)		(Commision File Number)		(IRS Employer Idetification No.)

3131 E. Camelback, Suite 211

Phoenix, AZ 85016

(Address of principal executive offices)

(602) 314-3231

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8−K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):

o	Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

o	Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a−12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a−12)

o	Pre−commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d−2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d−2(b))

o	Pre−commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e−4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e−4(c))

Item 4.01 Changes in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant

~~(a),~~Engagement ~~(b) The Audit Committee along with the approval~~ of ~~the~~New Board of Directors of Core Resource Management, Inc. (the “Company”) completed a competitive process to determine what audit firm would serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended Decemeber 31, 2015. On August 23, 2015 the Audit Committee determined to dismiss Chapman, Hext & Co., P.C. (“Chapman Hext”) as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm effective immediately due to billing that substantially exceeded the engagement agreement quote. Chapman Hext was employed, however, to provide services to the Company with respect to tax-planning and compliance services through year end 2014.Auditor

~~The~~In ~~reports~~a ofForm ~~Chapman~~8-K ~~Hext~~filed on ~~the~~August ~~Company’s consolidated financial statements as of and for the years ended December 31~~25, ~~2013 and up to the Third quarter of 2014~~2015, ~~did~~Core ~~not~~Resource ~~contain an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion~~Management, ~~and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles~~Inc.

~~During~~(“Reading,” the ~~years ended December 31~~“Company,” ~~2013~~“we,” “our” and ~~through August 23, 2015, there were no (a~~“us”) ~~reportable~~announced ~~events,~~that as ~~described~~a ~~under~~result ~~Item~~of ~~304(~~a~~)(1)(v)~~ ofcompetitive ~~Regulation~~request ~~S-K.~~for ~~(b)~~proposal ~~There~~process ~~was~~undertaken aby ~~disagreement as to~~ the ~~addition~~Audit Committee of ~~non-GAAP reporting tabulations as to~~ the ~~placement~~Board of ~~such~~Directors ~~figures for~~ (the ~~December~~“Audit 31Committee”), ~~2014 10-K reporting. Chapman stated and reiterated~~ that ~~non-GAAP~~it ~~reporting~~had ~~line~~dismissed ~~items although in a separate tabular format~~Chapman, ~~could~~Hext ~~not~~& ~~be placed in any form within the financial statement and instead could only be placed within the MD+A section~~Co. ~~In addition~~, ~~it made a judgment that no such descriptions could be placed within the footnotes of the financial section~~P.C. ~~Although~~(“Chapman ~~the~~Hext”) ~~Company~~as ~~disagrees with~~ the ~~judgment~~independent ~~and~~registered ~~rule~~public ~~interpretations,~~accounting itfirm ~~will acquiesce to file such tabulations only within the MD+A sections~~ of the ~~10-K and 10-Q reporting~~Company.

~~The~~On ~~Company~~October ~~provided~~8, ~~Chapman~~2015, ~~Hext~~our ~~with~~Audit aCommittee ~~copy~~approved the appointment of ~~the~~Adams ~~disclosures~~& itAssociates, isPLLC., ~~making~~a inProfessional ~~this~~Partnership ~~Current~~with ~~Report~~its onheadquarters ~~Form~~at ~~8-K. This~~748 ~~disclosure~~Eltham ~~was~~Court, ~~made~~Ann onArbor, MI 48103 (“Adams & Associates”) as the ~~date~~Company’s ofnew independent registered public accounting firm, to audit the ~~filing~~Company’s ~~prior~~financial statements, subject to ~~such~~the ~~filing~~completion ~~being~~of ~~made. The~~final ~~Company~~acceptance ~~has~~procedures ~~requested~~and ~~Chapman~~execution ~~Hext~~of ~~provide~~an itAudit aEngagement ~~letter~~Letter. On ~~addressed~~October to9, 2015, the ~~Securities~~Company ~~and~~formally ~~Exchange~~engaged ~~Commission~~Adams ~~indicating~~& ~~whether~~Associates itas ~~agrees~~the ~~with~~Company’s ~~such~~independent ~~disclosures~~registered public accounting firm.

Contemporaneous with the determination to dismiss Chapman Hext, the Audit Committee will aggressively seek to find new accounting and audit representation.

Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits

(d) Exhibits

Exhibit No.		Description
16.1		Letter from Chapman Hext & Co., P.C.*

N/A

* To be filed as a supplement to this 8-K disclosure when received.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this Report on Form 8−K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, ~~thereunto~~hereunto duly authorized.

	CORE RESOURCE MANAGEMENT, INC.
Dated: August 25, 2015	By:	/s/ Dennis W. Miller
Dated: October 13, 2015	By:	/s/ Dennis W. Miller
		Mr. Dennis W. Miller
		Chief Executive Officer

Filing Compare · Core Resource Management, Inc.