UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

o	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended _____________________

xþ TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from December 31, 2013 to June 30, ~~2014 Commission file number: 000-53757~~2015

Commission file number: 000-53757

America Greener Technologies, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	20-8195637
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

254 South Mulberry Street, Suite 113, Mesa, AZ	85202
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’'s telephone number, including area code: (480) 664-3650

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
None	Not applicable

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common stock, par value $0.001 per share ~~(Title of class)~~

~~Indicate by~~(Title ~~check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405~~ of ~~the Securities Act. o Yes x No~~class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is ~~not~~a ~~required~~well-known toseasoned ~~file~~issuer, ~~reports~~as ~~pursuant~~defined toin ~~Section~~Rule 13405 ~~or Section 15(d)~~ of the Securities Act. o Yes þ No

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o Yes þ x No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. þYes o No

~~x Yes~~Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.4.05 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). þYes o No

Indicate by check mark ~~whether~~if ~~the~~disclosure ~~registrant~~of ~~has~~delinquent ~~submitted~~filers ~~electronically~~pursuant ~~and~~to ~~posted~~Item on405 ~~its~~of ~~corporate~~Regulation ~~Website,~~S-K ifis ~~any,~~not ~~every~~contained ~~Interactive Data~~herein, ~~File~~and ~~required~~will tonot be ~~submitted~~contained, ~~and posted pursuant~~ to ~~Rule~~the ~~405~~best of ~~Regulation~~the ~~S-T~~registrant's ~~(§232.4.05~~knowledge, ofin ~~this~~definitive ~~chapter)~~proxy ~~during~~or ~~the preceding~~information 12statements ~~months~~incorporated ~~(or~~by ~~for~~reference ~~such~~in ~~shorter~~Part ~~period~~III ~~that~~of ~~the~~this ~~registrant~~Form ~~was~~10-K ~~required~~or toany ~~submit~~amendment ~~and~~to ~~post~~this ~~such~~Form ~~files)~~10-K. ¨ Yes þ No

x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

o Yes x No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company:

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o Smaller reporting company xþ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) o Yes xþ No

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked prices of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’'s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. $012,051,023 on December 31, ~~2013~~2014.

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’'s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. 19 20,~~005~~684,~~014~~848 shares of common stock are issued and outstanding as of ~~September~~October 182, ~~2014~~2015.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

List hereunder the following documents if incorporated by reference and the Part of the Form 10-K (e.g., Part I, Part II, etc.) into which the document is incorporated: (1) Any annual report to security holders; (2) Any proxy or information statement; and (3) Any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424(b) or (c) under the Securities Act of 1933. The listed documents should be clearly described for identification purposes (e.g., annual report to security holders for fiscal year ended December 24, 1980). None.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page No.	~~Page No.~~
Part I
Item 1.	Description of Business.	~~Description of Business.~~5	4
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.	~~Risk Factors.~~9	7
Item 1B.	Unresolved Staff Comments.	~~Unresolved Staff Comments.~~12	11
Item 2.	Description of Property.	~~Description of Property.~~12	11
Item 3.	Legal Proceedings.	~~Legal Proceedings.~~12	12
Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures.	~~Mine Safety Disclosures.~~12	12
Part II
Item 5.	Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.	~~Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.~~13	12
Item 6.	Selected Financial Data.	~~Selected Financial Data.~~14	13
Item 7.	Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.	~~Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.~~14	13
Item 7A.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.	~~Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.~~17	16
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.	~~Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.~~17	16
Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.	~~Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.~~18	16
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures.	~~Controls and Procedures.~~18	16
Item 9B.	Other Information.	~~Other Information.~~19	17
Part III
Item 10.	Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.	~~Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.~~19	17
Item 11.	Executive Compensation.	~~Executive Compensation.~~22	20
Item 12.	Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.	~~Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.~~23	21
Item 13.	Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.	~~Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.~~25	23
Item 14.	Principal Accounting Fees and Services.	~~Principal Accounting Fees and Services.~~26	24
Part IV
Item 15.	Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.	~~Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules.~~26	25

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION

This report includes forward-looking statements that relate to future events or our future financial performance and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to differ materially from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements. Words such as, but not limited to, “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “plan,” “targets,” “likely,” “aim,” “will,” “would,” “could,” and similar expressions or phrases identify forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and future events and financial trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operation, business strategy and financial needs. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:

·● our ~~limited operating history, · our~~ ability to continue as a going concern;, ·● our history of losses and ~~the~~working ~~expectation~~capital ~~that~~deficit; ~~our~~● ~~operating expenses will significantly increase, ·~~ the ability to raise working capital,; ·● ~~the~~our limited ~~public~~operating ~~company~~history; ~~experience~~● ofour reliance on our ~~management~~sole director and ~~directors,~~officer; ·● the ~~dependence~~ability onof our ~~executive~~former officers, ·and directors to enforce a security interest in our assets; ● our status as a former shell company; ● registration rights we have granted a principal stockholder; ● our lack of various corporate governance standards and no independent directors,; ·● the illiquid nature of our common stock,; ·● ~~registration rights we have granted a principal stockholder, ·~~ the ability of our board of directors to issue preferred stock without the approval of our stockholders,; ·● dilution to our stockholders upon the conversion of 3% convertible notes; ·● material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting; ~~and~~● · Federal regulations which may adversely impact the trading of our common stock.; and ● failure to comply with the regulations of the British Columbia Securities Commission

You should read thoroughly this report and the documents that we refer to herein with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from and/or worse than what we expect. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements including those made in this report and our other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Other sections of this report include additional factors which could adversely impact our business and financial performance. New risk factors emerge from time to time and it is not possible for our management to predict all risk factors, nor can we assess the impact of all factors on our business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Except for our ongoing obligations to disclose material information under the Federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to release publicly any revisions to any forward-looking statements, to report events or to report the occurrence of unanticipated events. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report, and you should not rely on these statements without also considering the risks and uncertainties associated with these statements and our business.

OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION

Unless specifically set forth to the contrary, when used in this report the terms “America Greener,” “we,” “our,” “us,” and similar terms refers to America Greener Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation formerly known as Osler Incorporated, and our ~~subsidiary~~subsidiaries America Greener Technologies Incorporated, an Arizona corporation which we refer to as “AGT Arizona” and AGT Soft Wave, Inc., a Nevada corporation which we refer to as “AGT Soft Wave.” In addition, “fiscal ~~2014~~2015” refers to the year ended June 30, ~~2014~~2015, “fiscal ~~2013~~2014” refers to the year ended June 30, ~~2013~~2014 and “fiscal ~~2015~~2016” refers to the year ending June 30, ~~2015~~2016.

Unless specifically set forth to the contrary, the information which appears on our website at www.americagreener.com is not part of this report.

PART I

ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS.

Overview

We ~~focus~~ onmarket two process improvement technologies ~~for the power~~, ~~petrochemical~~Polarchem and ~~heavy~~Soft ~~industrial market place~~Wave. We ~~sell~~generate arevenues ~~proprietary technology~~both ~~which we license~~ from ~~related~~the ~~parties~~provision ~~that allows soft online cleaning~~ of ~~industrial~~services ~~boiler~~associated ~~heat~~with ~~transfer~~the ~~surfaces. This~~Polarchem ~~online~~technology ~~cleaning~~business ~~allows~~as ~~users~~well toas ~~optimize~~from ~~their~~revenues ~~boiler~~under ~~system~~the ~~thereby~~service ~~reducing~~agreements ~~fuel~~we ~~consumption~~acquired ~~while~~as ~~also~~part ~~decreasing~~of ~~pollution and~~our ~~long-term~~acquisition ~~degradation~~ of ~~their~~certain ~~equipment.~~assets ~~Our~~of ~~target~~Soft ~~market~~Wave ~~includes coal fired power plants~~Innovations, ~~petroleum~~Inc. ~~refineries,~~("Soft ~~waste to~~Wave ~~energy~~Inc.") ~~facilities,~~in ~~biomass~~October ~~facilities, incinerators and other similar combustion operations~~2014.

~~Our subsidiary,~~Polarchem ~~AGT,~~is ~~was formed in February 2012 originally as~~ a ~~subsidiary~~proprietary oftechnology ~~America Greener Technologies Corporation, a British Columbia company~~ which we ~~refer~~license tofrom asrelated ~~AGT~~parties ~~Canada.~~that Inallows ~~November~~soft ~~2011~~online ~~AGT~~cleaning ~~Canada~~of ~~entered~~industrial ~~into~~boiler anheat ~~agreement~~transfer ~~with~~surfaces. This ~~Polarchem~~online ~~Associated Limited,~~cleaning ~~Polarchem~~allows ~~International~~users ~~Limited~~to ~~and~~optimize ~~the~~their ~~stockholders~~boiler ofsystem ~~those~~thereby ~~companies,~~reducing ~~which~~fuel weconsumption ~~collectively~~while ~~refer~~also todecreasing aspollution ~~Polarchem. AGT was formed to market~~ and ~~sell~~long-term ~~Polarchem’s~~degradation ~~proprietary technology solutions in North America under the terms~~ of ~~the~~their ~~November 2011 agreement~~equipment. Our Intarget ~~February~~market ~~2014~~includes ~~AGT~~coal ~~entered~~fired ~~into~~power aplants, 30petroleum ~~year~~refineries, ~~agreement~~waste ~~with Polarchem granting it exclusive rights~~ to ~~the~~energy ~~proprietary technology in the United States~~facilities, ~~Canada~~biomass ~~and Mexico which superseded the November 2011 agreement with AGT Canada. In addition~~facilities, in ~~February~~incinerators ~~2014 AGT Canada distributed the shares of AGT it owned to its stockholders~~ and ~~thereafter~~other ~~AGT~~similar ~~was~~combustion ~~no longer a subsidiary of AGT Canada. In March 2013 we acquired AGT in a transaction which is described later in this section under “Our history.” Our business and~~ operations ~~are now those of AGT~~.

Our Soft Wave technology is a patented technology which enables power plants, office buildings, factories and residential buildings and to run their cooling towers chemical free while meeting cooling tower operational and environmental requirements to control scale and minerals as well as harmful bacteria, while simultaneously delivering substantial reductions in water consumption.

Our subsidiary, AGT Arizona, was formed in February 2012 originally as a subsidiary of America Greener Technologies Corporation, a British Columbia company which we refer to as AGT Canada. In November 2011 AGT Canada entered into an agreement with Polarchem Associated Limited, Polarchem International Limited and the stockholders of those companies, which we collectively refer to as Polarchem. AGT Arizona was formed to market and sell Polarchem's proprietary technology solutions in North America under the terms of the November 2011 agreement. In February 2014 AGT Arizona entered into a 30 year agreement with Polarchem granting it exclusive rights to the proprietary technology in the United States, Canada and Mexico which superseded the November 2011 agreement with AGT Canada. In addition, in February 2014 AGT Canada distributed the shares of AGT Arizona it owned to its stockholders and thereafter AGT Arizona was no longer a subsidiary of AGT Canada. In March 2014 we acquired AGT Arizona in a transaction which is described later in this section under “Our history.”

The Polarchem technology

Polarchem was originally started in 1967 and has sold its primary chemistry, L2K, for over 45 years in Europe, Turkey, India, Russia, and Thailand. Users of the Polarchem technology have experience measurable reductions in fuel consumption, reduced or eliminated SO3 (sulfur trioxide) and vanadium pentoxide, as well as reduced particulate emissions. Polarchem’s customers are able to reduce costly soot blowing thus reducing abrasive wear on heat transfer surfaces and directly reduce unplanned shutdowns. Polarchem’s technology is referenced and described in the Boiler Operation and Engineering textbook. 2001, P. Chattopadhyay Chapter 16. While we have no ownership interest in Polarchem, as described elsewhere herein we are a party to an exclusive license agreement for the technology in the United States, Canada and Mexico.

4Polarchem target market

Our target market

Our internal analysis is that a potential market exists for the Polarchem technology in North America. Our target markets are broken into several categories:

·● Coal fired power plants - old technology plants, high sulfur coal and PRB (Powder River Basin) coal plants,

·● New coal fired power plants, including sequestration and carbon capture process technology,

·● Petroleum refineries,

·● Waste to energy

·● Biomass / incinerators,

·● Waste recovery boilers / cement plants,

·● Fuel oil boilers, and

·● Marine vessels.

Our internal analysis demonstrated that we have well over 2,000 large scale potential customers in North America in these target industries and markets.

Our business

Our primary focus is to supply and install the Polarchem non-toxic, biodegradable system for online cleaning of boiler tube and heat transfer surfaces. Additionally we offer the Polarchem G3 chemical composition for use in natural gas boilers and low sulfur combustion applications that experience soot fouling.

It has been our experience that our target market in North America is generally unaware of the existence of the Polarchem technology. In an effort to introduce the benefits of the Polarchem technology to our target customers, in 2013 we began offering select potential customers with a no-obligation trial.

~~Softwave~~AGT Soft Wave

~~In July~~We ~~2014~~acquired wethe ~~entered~~rights ~~into~~to acertain ~~Joint~~patented ~~Venture~~technology ~~Agreement~~previously ~~with~~used by Soft Wave ~~Innovations,~~ Inc. ~~(“Soft~~which ~~Wave”).~~enables ~~Under~~power ~~the terms of this agreement~~plants, ~~the~~office ~~parties agreed to undertake a joint venture which will permit us to research and develop~~buildings, ~~manufacture, market~~factories and ~~service~~residential ~~certain~~buildings ~~of the Soft Wave technology related~~ to anrun ~~apparatus~~their ~~for~~cooling ~~generating~~towers achemical ~~multi-vibrational~~free ~~field~~while inmeeting ~~worldwide residential,~~cooling ~~commercial~~tower ~~and~~operational ~~industrial markets including energy~~ and ~~power~~environmental ~~generation,~~requirements ~~petroleum~~to ~~and~~control ~~petrochemical,~~scale ~~mining~~ and ~~mineral~~ ~~processing.~~minerals ~~Since~~as ~~entering~~well ~~into~~as ~~this~~harmful ~~agreement~~bacteria, wewhile ~~have~~simultaneously ~~expensed~~delivering ~~approximately~~substantial ~~$41,000~~reductions onin ~~this~~water ~~project~~consumption.

~~In lieu~~Polarchem ofsales pursuing the relationship with Soft Wave under the joint venture structure, we have subsequently entered into discussions with its principals regarding our possible acquisition of Soft Wave’s assets, including its customer base and manufacturing operations. In preparation of entering into a definitive agreement, in September 2014 two of the Soft Wave principals who held the patent rights to Soft Wave’s technology assigned those patent rights to us. We are presently negotiating terms to acquire Soft Wave, but have yet to sign a definitive agreement. Our ability to consummate a transaction is dependent not only upon entering into a definitive agreement upon terms and conditions which are mutually agreeable, but ensuring that our auditors are able to audit Soft Wave’s financial statements for the periods and in the timeframe necessary to conform with the requirements of the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. If for some reason we are unable to obtain the necessary Soft Wave audited financial statements, we would assign the patent rights back to the original inventors and not proceed with the proposed transaction. Given the level of uncertainty that we will be able to consummate this transaction, investors should not place undue reliance on this pending transaction when evaluating our company’s prospects.marketing

Sales and marketing

We are marketing the Polarchem technology directly to power utilities, refineries, engineering groups, boiler manufacturers and other related companies. We also utilize trade show participation, including COAL-GEN, Coal Prep, EUEC (Energy and Environmental Conference), and POWER-GEN, as well as industry summit attendance including conferences organized by the Marcus Evans Group, Petrochem and POWER-GEN and web based ads.

~~Competition~~Polarchem competition

We compete with a number of companies in our target market. Our internal research determined that these existing competitors utilize what we believe to be an antiquated technology primarily based upon hydroxide chemistries. We believe that these systems provide some measure of improvement over no treatment, but are significantly less effective that the Polarchem technology.

Our current competitive product groups include Fuel-Tech, EES Corporation, and GE. The basis of all of our known competitor’s technology revolves around magnesium hydroxide and other oxide based products. We believe we may be able to compete in our target markets because the Polarchem technology uses a very small amount of chemical to clean boiler surfaces which permits our potential customers to reduce the amount of coal required for the same amount of heat and related electrical production from steam.

There are no assurances, however, that we will ever effectively compete in our target market. Substantially all of our competitors have established brand recognition, operating histories and are better capitalized than our company.

The Polarchem Licensing Agreement

Under the terms of the Polarchem Licensing Agreement, which expires in February 2044, we were granted the exclusive rights in the United States, Canada and Mexico to:

·● use the trademarks, service marks, copyrights, trade secrets and trade names including the name “Polarchem”™,

·● manufacture the Polarchem L2K and G3 chemical cleaning compositions for combustion efficiency currently marketed under the Polarchem trademark, and

·● supply certain services in the field of combustion efficiency.

Until such time as we establish facilities for the manufacture or mixing of the Polarchem chemical cleaning compositions, we currently purchase these products directly from Polarchem which is the sole source of the products. Under the terms of the Licensing Agreement, at such time, if ever, that we establish these operations, Polarchem agreed to provide cooperation and its expertise to ensure that we are successful in establishing these facilities. We have agreed with Polarchem to use our best efforts to improve the technology. Any improvements or other modifications to the Polarchem technology in our exclusive territory will be jointly owned by us and Polarchem. Polarchem will also provide training and technical expertise necessary to successfully manufacture the chemical cleaning compositions.

Polarchem granted us a right of first refusal to purchase its assets, as well as a right of first refusal as to any new products it desires to sell in United States, Canada or Mexico. The Polarchem stockholders also granted us a right of first refusal over their ownership interests in Polarchem. The agreement also contains customary confidentiality and indemnification provisions. Either party may terminate the Licensing Agreement upon a breach (after a 60 day cure period) by the other party, should the other party file for bankruptcy, begin liquidation proceedings or have a receiver appointed.

Soft Wave sales and marketing

AGT Soft Wave's target market includes:

● power plants,

● aluminum and steel manufacturing,

● refineries and chemical plants,

● pulp and paper mills,

● food processing plants,

● supermarkets,

● manufacturing plants,

● schools,

● hospitals,

● hotels and motels,

● commercial buildings,

● malls,

● laundromats,

● swimming facilities, and

● residential homes and pools.

To date, due to our limited financial and employee resources, we have only been able to install Soft Wave products in a small number of these market segments. We market directly to end users and have obtained our customers via direct marketing and direct contact, and expanding sales within our existing clientele.

Soft Wave competition

We compete with a number of companies in our target market. We believe that our proprietary Soft Wave technology offers substantial cost savings over those of our competitors who compete in the water treatment market with us.

Our current competitive product groups include Culligan, Eco Water (a Berkshire Hathaway subsidiary), Nalco and Clack. Fuel-Tech, EES Corporation, and GE. While we believe that the performance of our technology is superior to that of our competitors, there are no assurances, however, that we will ever effectively compete in our target market. Substantially all of our competitors have established brand recognition, operating histories and are better capitalized than our company.

Intellectual Property

In November 2013 we were granted a Federal trademark of our name “America Greener Technologies” and our logo under serial number 85574883. We rely on a combination of trademark, copyright law, trade secret protection, confidentiality agreements, and other contractual arrangements with our employees, suppliers, and others. These steps may not be adequate to protect our proprietary information. However, we may be unable to detect the unauthorized use of, or take appropriate steps to enforce, our intellectual property rights. Failure to adequately protect our intellectual property could harm our brand and adversely affect our ability to compete effectively. Further, defending our intellectual property rights could result in the expenditure of significant financial and managerial resources, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations, and financial condition in future periods.

6Prior to our acquisition of certain assets of Soft Wave Inc., Gary Dean Wilson, the President of Soft Wave, Inc. and Michael Dean Brown, the inventors of certain patented technology used by Soft Wave, Inc. assigned all of their right title and interest in and to that certain U.S. Patent No. 8,477,003, Serial No. 13/262.227 for apparatus for generating a multi-vibrational field us in exchange for the payment of royalty payments. We have received a demand from Mr. Wilson to return the rights to the assigned patent to him. We believe, based upon discussions with counsel, that the claims made by him are baseless.

We have also obtained the right to the Internet address www.americagreener.com. As with phone numbers, we do not have and cannot acquire any property rights in an Internet address. We do not expect to lose the ability to use the Internet address; however, there can be no assurance in this regard and the loss of this address could adversely impact our ability to market our business.

Employees

At ~~September~~ 18October 7, ~~2014~~2015, we had ~~seven~~two full time employees, including our ~~executive~~president ~~officers~~and ~~who~~sole ~~provide~~director ~~services~~who toworks for us ~~under~~without ~~consulting agreements~~compensation. We also engage third-party consultants and advisors as necessary to supplement our workforce.

Our history

We were incorporated in 2004 to engage in gold and silver exploration. Prior to our acquisition of AGT Arizona in March 2014, we had limited operations and were in the development stage. In April 2007, we acquired the Far 1 - 4 mineral claims comprising 82.64 acres in Esmeralda County, Nevada from James McLeod. Due to a lack of funding, we were unable to pay the maintenance fees to maintain the Far 1 - 4 mineral claims and the title to the Far 1 - 4 mineral claims was forfeited. Thereafter, we were a “shell company” as that term is defined under Federal securities laws, and our primary focus was an acquisition of or merger with a target company or business seeking the perceived advantages of being a publicly held corporation.

In furtherance of our business plan, in July 2009, we split-off our wholly-owned subsidiary Osler Leasco, Inc. (“OLI”) through the sale of all of the outstanding capital stock of OLI to our former chief executive officer. Pursuant to the terms of the split-off agreement, our former chief executive officer and chairman acquired all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of OLI in consideration of $28,000 previously paid by us to him and he returned to us an aggregate of 30,000,000 shares of our common stock owned by him that were subsequently cancelled.

In February 2014 we entered into a share exchange agreement with AGT Arizona and the shareholders of AGT Arizona whereby we agreed to acquire all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of AGT Arizona in exchange for 15,000,000 shares of our common stock. On March 19, 2014 the transaction closed and AGT Arizona became a wholly-owned subsidiary of our company. At closing, we issued 15,000,000 shares of our common stock to the former AGT Arizona shareholders. The transaction was accounted for as a reverse acquisition and recapitalization of AGT Arizona whereby AGT Arizona is considered the acquirer for accounting purposes. ~~Upon the closing of the transaction, our sole officer and director resigned and a new board of directors and new officers were appointed.~~

~~ITEM~~In 1AOctober 2014 AGT Soft Wave acquired certain assets from Soft Wave Inc. ~~RISK~~in ~~FACTORS~~exchange for 775,000 shares of our common stock valued at $767,250 under the terms of an asset purchase agreement. The assets that were acquired included customer contracts, trade names, inventory, tools and parts, and demonstration contracts related to the prior joint venture with Soft Wave Inc.

ITEM 1.A RISK FACTORS.

Before you invest in our securities, you should be aware that there are various risks. You should consider carefully these risk factors, together with all of the other information included in this annual report before you decide to purchase our securities. If any of the following risks and uncertainties develop into actual events, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially adversely affected.

Risks Related to our Business

We have a limited operating history on which to evaluate our business or base an investment decision.

Following the acquisition of AGT, our business is now the business and operations of AGT. AGT was formed in February 2012 and did not report revenues for 2013 or 2012. It began reporting revenues during the first quarter of calendar 2014. Our business prospects are difficult to predict because of the early stage of operations, our unproven business strategy and risks associated with introducing a new product to the North American markets. We face numerous risks and uncertainties in implementing our business plan. In particular, we have not proven that we can:

· develop customers for the Polarchem technology at a level that enables us to pay our operating expenses and become profitable; · develop and maintain relationships with key customers and strategic partners that will be necessary to optimize the market value of our products and services; · raise sufficient capital in the public and/or private markets; or · respond effectively to competitive pressures.

If we are unable to accomplish these goals, our business is unlikely to succeed and you should consider our prospects in light of these risks, challenges and uncertainties.

Our auditors have raised substantial doubts as to our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our financial statements have been prepared assuming we will continue as a going concern. Since inception we have experienced recurring losses from operations, which losses have caused an accumulated deficit of approximately $15.67 million at June 30, ~~2014~~2015. These factors, among others, raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. We anticipate that we will continue to incur losses in future periods until we are successful in significantly increasing our revenues. There are no assurances that we will be able to raise our revenues to a level which supports profitable operations and provides sufficient funds to pay our obligations. If we are unable to meet those obligations, we could be forced to cease operations in which event investors would lose their entire investment in our company.

We have incurred net losses since inception and wehave ~~expect~~a ~~our~~working ~~operating~~capital ~~expenses to increase significantly in the foreseeable future~~deficit.

We incurred net losses of approximately $4.1 million for fiscal 2015, $555,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2014, and $842,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013. ~~and~~Subject ~~approximately~~to ~~$200,000~~the ~~from~~availability ~~inception~~of ~~(February~~sufficient 14working capital, ~~2012)~~of ~~through~~which ~~December~~there ~~31,~~are ~~2012.~~no Weassurances, we anticipate that our operating expenses will increase substantially in the foreseeable future as we continue to expand our marketing channels and our operations, and incur additional expenses associated with our public company reporting obligations. These efforts may prove more expensive than we currently anticipate, and we may not succeed in increasing our revenues sufficiently to offset these higher expenses. There are no assurances we will be able to generate revenues which are sufficient to fund our operating expenses. Even if we are able to generate any material amount of revenues in future periods, we cannot be certain that we will be able to ever report profitable operations. If we are unable to effectively manage these risks and difficulties as we encounter them, our business, financial condition and results of operations may suffer and our ability to continue as a going concern will be in jeopardy.

We will need additional financing which we may not be able to obtain on acceptable terms. If we cannot raise additional capital as needed, our ability to ~~grow~~continue ~~our~~as ~~company~~a going concern could be in jeopardy.

~~Capital is~~We ~~needed~~do ~~for~~not ~~the~~generate ~~effective~~sufficient ~~expansion~~net ofrevenues to pay our ~~business~~operating expenses or our debts as they become due. At June 30, 2015 we had a working capital deficit of $1,203,805 and we used $816,625 of cash in our operations in fiscal 2015. To date, our capital needs were funded by our former parent company, short-term loans and advances from related parties. Our future capital requirements, however, depend on a number of factors, including our ability to internally grow our revenues, manage our business and control our expenses. In order to satisfy our current obligations and fully implement our growth strategy, we will need to initially raise approximately $1.35 million of additional capital. We do not have any firm commitments to provide any additional capital and ~~we anticipate that we will~~ have experienced certain difficulties raising capital during fiscal 2015 given the limited operating history of our company. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that additional working capital will be available to us upon terms acceptable to us. If we are subsequently unable to raise additional funds as needed, our ability to ~~grow~~continue ~~our~~as ~~company~~a going concern is in jeopardy.

8We have a limited operating history on which to evaluate our business or base an investment decision.

~~Our management~~Following ~~has~~the ~~limited~~acquisition ~~experience~~of AGT Arizona, our business is now the business and operations of AGT Arizona. AGT Arizona was formed in ~~operating~~February 2012 and did not report revenues for 2013 or 2012. It began reporting revenues during the first quarter of calendar 2014. In October 2014 we acquired certain assets from Soft Wave Inc. which included service contracts. Since the closings of these transactions, however, we have been unable to generate any significant continuing revenues from either AGT Arizona or AGT Soft Wave. Our business prospects are difficult to predict because of the early stage of operations, our unproven business strategy and risks associated with introducing a ~~public~~new ~~company~~product to the North American markets. We face numerous risks and uncertainties in implementing our business plan. In particular, we have not proven that we can:

~~Our executive~~● ~~officers~~develop ~~and~~customers ~~directors~~for ~~have limited or no experience in~~ the ~~management~~Polarchem oftechnology aand ~~publicly~~Soft ~~traded~~Wave ~~company.~~at ~~Our management team may not successfully or effectively manage our transition to~~ a ~~public~~level ~~company~~ that ~~will~~enables beus ~~subject~~ to ~~significant~~pay ~~regulatory oversight~~our ~~and~~operating ~~reporting~~expenses ~~obligations~~and ~~under~~become ~~federal~~profitable; ~~securities~~● ~~laws.~~develop ~~Their~~and ~~limited~~maintain ~~experience~~relationships ~~in dealing~~ with ~~the~~key ~~increasingly~~customers ~~complex laws~~and ~~pertaining~~strategic topartners ~~public companies could be a significant disadvantage to us in~~ that ~~it is likely that an increasing amount of their time~~ will be ~~devoted~~necessary to ~~these~~optimize ~~activities which will result in less time being devoted to~~ the ~~management~~market ~~and~~value ~~growth~~ of our ~~company.~~ Itproducts ~~is possible that we will be required to expand our employee base~~ and ~~hire~~services; ~~additional~~● ~~employees,~~raise ~~such~~sufficient ascapital ~~a chief financial officer experienced~~ in ~~public~~the ~~company financial reporting, to support our operations as a~~ public ~~company~~and/or ~~which~~private ~~will~~markets; ~~increase~~or ~~our operating~~● ~~costs~~respond ineffectively ~~future~~to ~~periods~~competitive pressures.

~~We rely on our executive officers and directors, without whose services our business operations could cease. Our executive officers presently provide services under the terms of consulting agreements.~~9

~~We are~~If ~~materially reliant on the services of our executive officers for the operation of our company. In addition,~~ we are ~~also~~unable ~~materially reliant~~to onaccomplish ~~services~~these ~~provided~~goals, by our ~~non-management~~business ~~director.~~is ~~These~~unlikely ~~individuals are each parties~~ to asucceed ~~consulting~~and ~~agreement~~you ~~which may~~should beconsider ~~terminated~~our byprospects ~~either~~in ~~party~~light ~~upon~~of 30these ~~days notice. As such~~risks, ~~they~~challenges ~~are~~and ~~not parties to any long-term contractual obligation to remain employed by us, although they have no present intent to leave~~uncertainties. If ~~our~~we ~~management~~are ~~should~~unable ~~choose~~ to ~~leave~~generate ~~us for~~ any ~~reason before~~meaningful wecontinuing ~~have~~revenues, ~~hired additional experienced personnel~~ our ~~operations~~ability ~~may fail. Even if we are able~~ to ~~find~~continue ~~additional personnel, it is uncertain whether we could find qualified management who could develop~~ our business ~~along~~and ~~the lines described herein or would be willing to work for compensation we could afford. Without such management, we could be forced to cease~~ operations ~~and investors~~is in ~~our common stock could lose their entire investment~~jeopardy. We also compensate our executive officers as consultants which effectively reduces our overall compensation expense. If we were to enter into employment agreements with either or both of our executive officers, our operational expenses would further increase.

Our ~~ability~~ tomanagement ~~raise~~has ~~necessary~~no ~~working~~experience ~~capital~~in ~~and~~operating ~~convert~~a ~~certain~~U.S. ~~convertible~~public ~~notes is presently adversely impacted by proceedings involving the British Columbia Securities Commission~~company.

~~Following the~~Our ~~closing~~sole ofofficer ~~the~~and ~~reverse~~director, ~~merger~~who inwas ~~March~~appointed ~~2014,~~in weSeptember ~~were~~2015 ~~notified~~following by the ~~British~~resignations ~~Columbia Securities Commission (“BCSC”)~~ of aour ~~cease~~prior ~~trade~~officers ~~order~~and ~~issued~~directors, byhas itno experience in ~~April~~the ~~2009~~management ~~against~~of usa. ~~which~~U.S. ~~prohibited~~publicly ustraded ~~from~~company. ~~trading~~His ininexperience ~~our securities~~ in ~~British~~dealing ~~Columbia, Canada until we filed certain reports~~ with the ~~BCSC.~~increasingly ~~Neither~~complex welaws ~~nor~~pertaining ~~the management of our company prior~~ to ~~the reverse merger were aware of the prior order~~U.S. ~~The~~public ~~BCSC~~companies iscould ~~alleging~~be ~~the~~a ~~reverse~~significant ~~merger~~disadvantage ~~with~~to ~~AGT~~us ~~violated~~in ~~this~~that ~~cease~~it ~~trade~~is ~~order~~likely asthat aan ~~number~~increasing amount of ~~the~~ ~~AGT~~his ~~shareholders~~time ~~were~~will ~~residents~~be ordevoted ~~citizens~~to ofthese ~~British~~activities ~~Columbia.~~which ~~While~~will weresult ~~have~~in ~~paid~~less atime ~~$25,000~~being ~~fine~~devoted to the ~~BCSC~~management and ~~are~~growth ~~presently negotiating a lifting~~ of ~~the~~our ~~cease~~company. ~~trade~~It ~~order, until such matter~~ is ~~resolved~~possible that we ~~are~~will ~~unable~~be required to ~~enter~~expand ~~into~~our ~~securities~~employee ~~transactions with~~base ~~residents~~and orhire ~~citizens~~additional ofemployees ~~British~~or ~~Columbia.~~consultants, ~~This~~such ~~inability~~as isa ~~presently~~chief ~~adversely~~financial ~~impacting~~officer ~~our~~experienced ~~ability~~in topublic ~~raise~~company ~~working~~financial ~~capital and~~reporting, ~~resulted in the need~~ to ~~extend~~support ~~the~~our ~~maturity~~operations ~~date~~as ofa ~~two~~public ~~related~~company ~~party~~which ~~convertible~~will ~~notes.~~increase ~~There~~our ~~are~~operating nocosts ~~assurances~~in ~~this~~future ~~matter will be resolved to our benefit~~periods.

We rely on our executive officer and director, without whose services our business operations could cease.

We are materially reliant on the services of Mr. John Mooney, our sole executive officer, for the operation of our company. Mr. Mooney has held this position since September 2015 following the resignations of our prior executive officers upon whom we were materially dependent. Mr. Mooney is presently serving without compensation. We are not a party to an employment or similar agreement with Mr. Mooney and there are no assurances his services will continue to be available to us. If our management should choose to leave us for any reason before we have hired additional experienced personnel our operations may fail. Even if we are able to find additional personnel, it is uncertain whether we could find qualified management who could develop our business along the lines described herein or would be willing to work for compensation we could afford. Without such management, we could be forced to cease operations and investors in our common stock could lose their entire investment.

Certain of our former executive officers and directors have been granted a security interest in our assets.

On August 24, 2015 Ms. Carrie Borgen and Mr. Rick Barbosa, former executive officers and directors of our company, converted a total of $90,000 in unsecured loans which they had made to us between January 2014 and March 2015 to secured loans using Uniform Commercial Code (“UCC”) liens signed by Mr. Mike Boyko, our former CEO. We do not believe the approval of the then board of directors was obtained at the time of the granting of the security interest. We have engaged legal counsel to evaluate the validity of the granting of the security interest. If it should be ultimately determined that these former officers and directors have a valid security interest in our assets, in the event we are unable to satisfy the amounts due them they could foreclose on our assets. In that event, we would be unable to continue our business and operations as they are currently conducted.

Risk Related to Our Common Stock

Until March 19, 2014 we were considered a “shell company” and there is no active market for our common stock. Even if a market develops, the ability of our stockholders to resell their shares is limited by Federal securities laws.

Prior to our acquisition of AGT Arizona in March 2014, we were a “shell company” as that term is defined under Federal securities laws. While our common stock is quoted on the OTC Markets, there is no active market and we do not know if a market will ever be established. As a result, an investment in our common stock should be considered an illiquid investment.

9In addition, at October 2, 2015 we had 20,684,848 outstanding shares of common stock, of which 16,527,434 are “restricted securities” under Rule 144 of the Securities Act In general, under Rule 144 of the Securities Act, as currently in effect, a person, or person whose shares are aggregated, who is not our affiliate or has not been an affiliate during the prior three months and owns shares that were purchased from us, or any affiliate, at least six months previously, is entitled to make unlimited public resale’s of such shares provided there is current public information available at the time of the resale’s. A person, or persons whose shares are aggregated, who are affiliates of the issuer and own shares that were purchased from us, or any affiliate, at least six months previously is generally entitled to sell within any three month period, a number of shares of common stock that does not exceed 1% of the then outstanding shares of common stock, subject to manner of sale provisions, notice requirements and the availability of current public information about the issuer. The ability, however, of our stockholders to rely upon Rule 144 is limited by our former status as a shell company. As such, our stockholders are not able to rely on Rule 144 for the sale of shares of our common stock until a period of 12 months has lapsed from the filing date of this Current Report. If less than 12 months has elapsed since we ceased being a “shell company”, then only registered shares can be sold pursuant to Rule 144. Except as set forth elsewhere herein, we have no obligation to register the resale any of outstanding shares of our common stock. Lastly, any shares held by affiliates, including shares received in any registered offering, will be subject to the resale restrictions of Rule 144(i). Future sales of restricted common stock under Rule 144 or otherwise could negatively impact the market price of our common stock, should a market develop of which there are no assurances.

In addition, at September 18, 2014 we had 19,005,014 outstanding shares of common stock, of which 18,347,601 are “restricted securities” under Rule 144 of the Securities Act. In general, under Rule 144 of the Securities Act, as currently in effect, a person, or person whose shares are aggregated, who is not our affiliate or has not been an affiliate during the prior three months and owns shares that were purchased from us, or any affiliate, at least six months previously, is entitled to make unlimited public resales of such shares provided there is current public information available at the time of the resales. A person, or persons whose shares are aggregated, who are affiliates of the issuer and own shares that were purchased from us, or any affiliate, at least six months previously is generally entitled to sell within any three month period, a number of shares of common stock that does not exceed 1% of the then outstanding shares of common stock, subject to manner of sale provisions, notice requirements and the availability of current public information about the issuer. The ability, however, of our stockholders to rely upon Rule 144 is limited by our former status as a shell company. As such, our stockholders are not able to rely on Rule 144 for the sale of shares of our common stock until a period of 12 months has lapsed from the filing date of this Current Report. If less than 12 months has elapsed since we ceased being a “shell company”, then only registered shares can be sold pursuant to Rule 144. Except as set forth elsewhere herein, we have no obligation to register the resale any of outstanding shares of our common stock. Lastly, any shares held by affiliates, including shares received in any registered offering, will be subject to the resale restrictions of Rule 144(i). Future sales of restricted common stock under Rule 144 or otherwise could negatively impact the market price of our common stock, should a market develop of which there are no assurances.10

We have granted our former principal stockholder registration rights for approximately 9.6% of our currently outstanding common stock.

Under the terms of the Share Exchange Agreement for our acquisition of AGT Arizona, we granted Insurance Marketing Solutions, LLC a company controlled by our former sole officer and director (“IMS”) demand registration rights for 1,822,601 shares of our outstanding common stock. We are obligated to pay substantially all of the costs associated with the filing of this resale registration statement. IMS has elected to exercise these demand rights, ~~and~~however, we ~~expect~~have yet to file the resale registration statement ~~following~~ and given our limited resources we do not know when we will be in a position to make the required filing. At ofsuch ~~this~~time ~~annual~~as ~~report.~~the ~~Upon~~registration statement is filed, upon the effectiveness of the registration statement it would be entitled to resell these shares in the market without complying with the resale limitations of Rule 144. Assuming a market for our common stock should develop, of which there is no assurance, sales of these shares by IMS could adversely impact the market price of our common stock in future periods.

We have not voluntarily implemented various corporate governance measures, in the absence of which stockholders may have more limited protections against interested director transactions, conflicts of interests and similar matters.

We have not yet adopted any corporate governance measures and, since our securities are not yet listed on a national securities exchange, we are not required to do so. We have not adopted corporate governance measures such as an audit or other independent committees of our board of directors as we presently do not have any independent directors. In the future, we may seek to establish an audit and other committees of our board of directors. It is possible that if we were to adopt some or all of these corporate governance measures, stockholders would benefit from somewhat greater assurances that internal corporate decisions were being made by disinterested directors and that policies had been implemented to define responsible conduct. For example, in the absence of audit, nominating and compensation committees comprised of at least a majority of independent directors, decisions concerning matters such as compensation packages to our senior officers and recommendations for director nominees may be made by a majority of directors who have an interest in the outcome of the matters being decided. Prospective investors should bear in mind our current lack of corporate governance measures in formulating their investment decisions.

Provisions of our articles of incorporation and bylaws may delay or prevent a take-over which may not be in the best interests of our stockholders.

Provisions of our articles of incorporation and bylaws may be deemed to have anti-takeover effects, which include when and by whom special meetings of our stockholders may be called, and may delay, defer or prevent a takeover attempt. In addition, certain provisions of the Nevada Revised Statutes also may be deemed to have anti-takeover effects which include that control of shares acquired in excess of certain specified thresholds will not possess any voting rights unless these voting rights are approved by a majority of a corporation’s disinterested stockholders. Further, our articles of incorporation authorizes the issuance of up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock with such rights and preferences as may be determined from time to time by our board of directors in their sole discretion. Our board of directors may, without stockholder approval, issue series of preferred stock with dividends, liquidation, conversion, voting or other rights that could adversely affect the voting power or other rights of the holders of our common stock.

10The conversion of the outstanding convertible notes will be dilutive to our stockholders. We may change the terms of certain additional outstanding loans to provide for the conversion into shares of our common stock which will also be dilutive to our stockholders.

~~The conversion~~In March 2014 prior to the closing of the ~~outstanding~~acquisition of AGT Arizona by our company, AGT Arizona issued 3% convertible promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $100,000 to two affiliates, including a company related to our sole officer and director, in payment of advances made to AGT Arizona in January 2014 and February 2014 by these affiliates. Following the closing of the acquisition of AGT Arizona on March 19, 2014, by the terms of the notes they are now convertible into shares of our common stock at $0.40 per share. These notes, which matured on December 31, 2014, remain outstanding. The issuance of these additional shares will be dilutive to our stockholders.

In ~~March~~ ~~2014~~addition, ~~prior~~we toowe ~~the~~various ~~closing~~lenders, ofincluding ~~the~~an ~~acquisition~~affiliate of ~~AGT by~~ our ~~company,~~sole ~~AGT~~officer ~~issued~~and 3%director, ~~convertible promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of~~ $~~100~~623,~~000~~450 tounder ~~two~~the ~~affiliates~~terms ~~in payment~~ of ~~advances~~3% ~~made~~promissory tonotes ~~AGT~~which matured in ~~January~~July ~~2014~~2015. We ~~and~~expect ~~February~~the ~~2014~~due bydate of these ~~affiliates. These~~ notes ~~mature~~will onbe ~~December~~extended ~~31,~~and ~~2014,~~a ~~but~~provision ~~are~~permitting ~~convertible at any time at either~~ the ~~option~~conversion of the ~~holder~~obligation ~~or AGT~~ into shares of ~~AGT’s~~our common stock at a ~~conversion~~to-be-determined price ofwill $0be added.40 However, ~~per~~as ~~share.~~these ~~Following~~not ~~the~~modifications ~~closing~~have ofyet ~~the~~to ~~acquisition~~be offormalized ~~AGT~~there onare ~~March 19,~~no ~~2014,~~assurances bythat the ~~terms~~lenders ofwill agree to the ~~notes~~modified ~~they~~terms. If ~~are~~these ~~now~~notes become convertible ~~into~~debt ~~shares~~and ofthe ~~our~~noteholders ~~common~~elect ~~stock~~to atconvert ~~$0.40~~the ~~per~~notes, ~~share.~~the ~~The~~ issuance of these additional shares of our common stock will be dilutive to our stockholders.

We have concluded that a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting existed at June 30, ~~2014~~2015 as a result of not having adequate personnel with sufficient experience in financial reporting.

As part of its assessment, management concluded that, as of June 30, ~~2014~~2015, a material weakness in internal control over financial reporting existed as a result of not having adequate personnel with sufficient experience in financial reporting. Although we engage a part-time third party accounting consultant with significant experience in GAAP and SEC reporting, it is unlikely we will be able to remediate these material weaknesses until such time as we hire additional accounting personnel who have a comprehensive understanding of GAAP and SEC reporting. However, even with these remedial measures successfully implemented, the effectiveness of any system of disclosure controls and procedures is subject to limitations, including the exercise of judgment in designing, implementing and evaluating the controls and procedures, the assumptions used in identifying the likelihood of future events and the inability to eliminate misconduct completely. Moreover, additional material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting may be identified in the future.

The tradability of our common stock is limited under the penny stock regulations which may cause the holders of our common stock difficulty should they wish to sell the shares.

Because the quoted price of our common stock is less than $5.00 per share and we do not meet certain other rule exclusions, our common stock is considered a “penny stock,” and trading in our common stock is subject to the requirements of Rule 15g-9 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Under this rule, broker/dealers who recommend low-priced securities to persons other than established customers and accredited investors must satisfy special sales practice requirements. The broker/dealer must make an individualized written suitability determination for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written consent prior to the transaction. SEC regulations also require additional disclosure in connection with any trades involving a “penny stock,” including the delivery, prior to any penny stock transaction, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and its associated risks. These requirements severely limit the liquidity of securities in the secondary market because few broker or dealers are likely to undertake these compliance activities and this limited liquidity will make it more difficult for an investor to sell his shares of our common stock in the secondary market should the investor wish to liquidate the investment. In addition to the applicability of the penny stock rules, other risks associated with trading in penny stocks could also be price fluctuations and the lack of a liquid market.

We are subject to certain reporting obligations and restrictions as were are considered an OTC reporting issuer by the British Columbia Securities Commission (the BCSC). Failure to comply with BCSC reporting requirements may result in the BCSC issuing a cease trade order against us.

We are subject to certain reporting obligations, as the BCSC has deemed us to be an OTC reporting issuer. Failure to comply with OTC reporting issuer disclosure requirements may result in the BCSC issuing a cease trade order. If we are subject to a cease trade order we are prohibited from selling any of our securities or trading our securities. If we receive a cease trade order, we may be subject to additional costs related to the revocations of the cease trade order and may incur administrative penalties in connection with the cease trade order.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

Not applicable to a smaller reporting company.

ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY.

Our principal executive offices are located in approximately 5,000 square feet of leased space in Mesa, AZ. Under the terms of the three year lease entered into in February 2012, as amended in May 2014, we pay an escalating amount of rent, currently $3,~~300~~ 630 per month through the end of the term, in addition to common area maintenance charges. Our total rent expense was $2149,~~017~~400 ~~and $40,312~~ for ~~the~~fiscal ~~six months ended June 30, 2014 and for the year ended December 31, 2013, respectively~~2015.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

We are not a party to any pending orlitigation. As ~~threatened~~described ~~litigation~~earlier in this report, one of the original Soft Wave patent holders has challenged his assignment to us.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable to our company.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Our common stock is quoted in the OTCQB Tier of the OTC Markets under the symbol “AGRN.” Our common stock is very thinly traded. The reported high and low last sale prices for the common stock are shown below for the periods indicated. The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commission, and may not represent actual transactions.

	High		Low
2013
First quarter ended September 30, 2012	$	0.00	$	0.00
Second quarter ended December 31, 2012	$	0.00	$	0.00
Third quarter ended March 31, 2013	$	0.00	$	0.00
Fourth quarter ended June 30, 2013	$	0.00	$	0.00
2014
First quarter ended September 30, 2013	$	0.00	$	0.00
Second quarter ended December 31, 2013	$	0.00	$	0.00
Third quarter ended March 31, 2014	$	2.50	$	0.60
Fourth quarter ended June 30, 2014	$	1.00	$	0.33
2015
First quarter ended September 30, 2014	$	0.80	$	0.30
Second quarter ended December 31, 2014	$	1.04	$	0.60
Third quarter ended March 31, 2015	$	0.90	$	0.75
Fourth quarter ended June 30, 2015	$	0.85	$	0.71
2016
First quarter ended September 30, 2015	$	0.71	$	0.30

The last sale price of our common stock as reported on the OTC Markets on ~~August~~October 89, ~~2014,~~2015 ~~which~~ was ~~the last day before the filing date of this report in which shares of our common stock were traded, was~~ $0.8024 per share. As of ~~September~~October 182, ~~2014~~2015, there were approximately 5183 record owners of our common stock.

Dividend policy

We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock. Under Nevada law, we are prohibited from paying dividends if the distribution would result in our company not be able to pay its debts as they become due in the usual course of business or if our total assets would be less than the sum of our total liabilities plus the amount that would be needed, we were to be dissolved at the time of distribution, to satisfy the preferential rights upon dissolution of stockholders whose preferential rights are superior to those receiving the distribution. Our board of directors has complete discretion on whether to pay dividends, subject to the approval of our stockholders. Even if our board of directors decides to pay dividends, the form, frequency and amount will depend upon our future operations and earnings, capital requirements and surplus, general financial condition, contractual restrictions and other factors that the board of directors may deem relevant. While our board of directors will make any future decisions regarding dividends as circumstances surrounding our company changes, presently it is not anticipated that we will pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.

Recent sales of unregistered securities

~~None~~In July 2015, ~~except~~ we sold 200,000 shares of our common stock to an accredited investor and received net proceeds of $100,000 or $0.50 per share. The issuance was exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as ~~previously~~amended, ~~reported~~in reliance on an exemption provided by Section 4(a)(2) of that act. We did not pay any commissions or finder's fees and used the net proceeds for working capital.

Purchases of equity securities by the issuer and affiliated purchasers

None.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

Not applicable to a smaller reporting company.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

On March 19, 2014 we closed the acquisition of AGT. The transaction was accounted for as a reverse acquisition and recapitalization of AGT whereby AGT is considered the acquirer for accounting purposes and we are the legal survivor. AGT’s audited financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2013 and the period from February 14, 2012 (inception) to December 31, 2012 were included in our Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 24, 2014. Although AGT was considered the accounting acquirer, we retained our fiscal year of June 30. Accordingly, the audited consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this report are for the six month period ended June 30, 2014. The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes to those statements that are included elsewhere in this report.

Overview

~~Prior to~~We ~~the~~focus ~~acquisition~~on ofprocess ~~AGT~~improvement technologies for the power, petrochemical and heavy industrial market place. We market a proprietary technology for which we ~~were~~hold a ~~“shell~~30-year ~~company”~~exclusive aslicense for the U.S., Canada and Mexico that ~~term~~allows issoft ~~defined~~online incleaning ~~Federal~~of ~~securities~~industrial ~~laws~~boiler heat transfer surfaces. OnThis ~~March 19~~online cleaning allows users to optimize their boiler system, ~~2014~~thereby wereducing ~~acquired~~fuel ~~AGT~~consumption inwhile aalso ~~share~~decreasing ~~exchange~~pollution ~~agreement~~and ~~with~~long-term ~~its~~degradation ~~shareholders~~of their equipment. ~~AGT~~Our istarget ~~now~~market includes coal fired power plants, petroleum refineries, waste to energy facilities, biomass facilities, incinerators and other similar combustion operations. In July 2014, we were assigned the exclusive patent rights to an apparatus for generating a ~~wholly~~multi-~~owned~~vibrational ~~subsidiary~~field by the inventors and holders of ~~our~~the ~~company~~patent in exchange for the payment of royalty payments. ~~Upon~~ This patent was the ~~closing~~basis of ~~this~~certain ~~transaction~~proprietary technology offered by AGT Soft Wave which enables power plants to run their cooling towers chemical free while meeting cooling tower operational and environmental requirements to control scale and minerals as well as harmful bacteria, weand, ~~exited~~simultaneously ~~shell~~delivering ~~status~~substantial reductions in water consumption. This technology treats the water and ~~our~~eliminates ~~business~~the need to use chemicals to control scaling and ~~operations~~bio-film; ~~are~~improves ~~now~~water ~~those~~clarity; and, reduces the chemical residue of pollution related phosphates and nitrates in the water. AGT Soft Wave has continued to service the customers according to their previous contracts since the acquisition of those customer agreements in October 2014.

~~We focus~~Our onacquisition ~~process~~of ~~improvement~~the ~~technologies~~Soft ~~for~~Wave ~~the~~customer ~~power,~~service ~~petrochemical~~agreements has resulted in increased sales opportunities via cross-selling opportunities between existing and ~~heavy~~targeted ~~industrial~~AGT ~~market~~Arizona ~~place~~and AGT Soft Wave customers. WeThese ~~sell~~acquired acustomer ~~proprietary technology~~service ~~which~~agreements wehave ~~license~~provided ~~from~~us ~~related~~with ~~parties~~an ~~that~~additional ~~allow~~$48,000 ~~soft~~per ~~online~~month ~~cleaning~~in ofconsistent, ~~industrial~~recurring ~~boiler~~revenues ~~heat~~during ~~transfer~~fiscal ~~surfaces~~2015. ~~This~~ ~~online~~These ~~cleaning~~agreements ~~allows~~have ~~users~~been toin ~~optimize~~place ~~their~~for ~~boiler~~several ~~system~~years ~~thereby~~with ~~reducing~~virtually ~~fuel~~no ~~consumption~~attrition. ~~while~~The ~~also~~technicians ~~decreasing pollution~~ and ~~long-term~~sales ~~degradation~~team previously servicing the Soft Wave accounts were initially hired as employees of ~~their~~AGT ~~equipment.~~Soft ~~Our~~Wave ~~target~~and ~~market~~continued ~~includes~~to ~~coal~~service ~~fired~~customers ~~power~~that ~~plants,~~existed ~~petroleum~~at ~~refineries~~the time of the acquisition. In September 2015, ~~waste~~ however, we have terminated these employees due to ~~energy~~insufficient ~~facilities,~~working ~~biomass~~capital. ~~facilities,~~We ~~incinerators~~have retained one technician and ~~other~~one ~~similar~~sales ~~combustion~~person ~~operations~~under a consulting basis. Consequently, we expect revenues to decrease during fiscal 2016.

Although we do not have any commitments for capital expenditures, we do not have sufficient working capital to fund our operations and satisfy our obligations as they become due. Our lack of working capital is adversely impacting our ability to grow our company and continue our day to day operations. We ~~began~~ ~~reporting~~will ~~revenues~~need to raise at least $1.5 million to repay debt and provide three months working capital and funds required to invest in AGT Soft Wave to increase our sales and also to provide funding for marketing and sales, IT infrastructure, manufacturing equipment, the ~~first~~purchase ~~quarter~~of Polarchem inventory for expected contracts, our operating infrastructure, fund the additional costs of ~~calendar~~our ~~2014~~public company reporting obligations and satisfy our obligations as they become due. To date, we have been principally dependent upon advances and loans from related parties to fund our operations and at June 30, ~~2014~~2015 we owe those related parties an aggregate of approximately $~~145~~416,000. In addition, we have borrowed an additional $~~273~~400,~~188~~000 ~~as of September 15, 2014~~ from third parties under promissory notes which ~~mature~~matured in July 2015. ~~Although~~and weadditional doloan ~~not~~of ~~have~~$50,000 ~~any~~which ~~commitments~~is ~~for~~non-interest ~~capital~~bearing ~~expenditures~~and is due on demand. Between November 2014 and February 2015, we ~~will~~received ~~need~~gross toproceeds ~~initially~~of ~~raise approximately~~ $~~1.3~~292,000 ~~million~~from the sale of ~~additional~~shares ~~capital~~of toour ~~provide~~common ~~funding~~stock ~~for~~in ~~marketing~~a ~~and~~private ~~our~~transaction. ~~operating~~Subsequent ~~infrastructure~~to June 30, to2015, ~~fund~~we received gross proceeds of $100,000 from the ~~additional~~sale ~~costs~~ of shares of our ~~public~~common ~~company~~stock ~~reporting~~in ~~obligations~~a private transaction and ~~satisfy~~a ~~our~~third ~~obligations~~party aslent ~~they~~us ~~become~~$100,000. While ~~due~~we are currently negotiating with this third party to provide additional debt financing to us, there are no assurances the terms will be acceptable to us. There are also no assurances that these related parties will continue to advance funds to us for our working capital needs. Given the small size of our company, the early stage of our operations, we ~~may~~have ~~find~~found it difficult to raise sufficient capital to meet our needs. IfWhile we continue to explore a variety of potential sources of equity or debt financing for our company, if we are unable to access capital as needed, our ability to grow our company is in jeopardy and, absent a significant increase in our revenues, we may be unable to continue as a going concern.

Going Concern

We have incurred net losses of $~~1,598,832~~5.7 million since inception through June 30, ~~2014~~2015. The report of our independent registered public accounting firm on our consolidated financial statements for ~~the~~fiscal ~~six~~2015 ~~months ended June 30, 2014~~ contained an explanatory paragraph regarding our ability to continue as a going concern based upon our net losses and cash used in operations. These factors, among others, raised substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this report do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. There are no assurances we will be successful in our efforts to generate consistent revenues or report profitable operations or to continue as a going concern, in which event investors would lose their entire investment in our company.

Results of Operations

~~Our~~ We generate revenues ~~for~~both from the provision of services associated with our historic business as well as from revenues under the service agreements we acquired as part of our acquisition of Soft Wave in October 2014. During fiscal 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2014, approximately 59% and 100%, respectively, were related to the completion of services associated with aan ~~one-time soft~~ online cleaning technology demonstration that included mobilization, de-mobilization, labor and chemistry. These services were rendered by us under a three year, open service agreement. ~~Our~~The ~~client~~agreement, ~~may~~which ~~request~~provides ~~our~~for services (by us on an as needed) ~~during~~basis ~~this~~is ~~term~~still in effect, however, the client has not required us to provide any additional services since January 2015. ~~This~~Our ability to both service any new customer we may engage or to provide additional services under the three year open service agreement iswill ~~renewable~~be subject to the availability of sufficient capital to fund these contracts.

~~Our cost~~During fiscal 2015, approximately 40% of our revenues were associated with our AGT Soft Wave operations. We do not have comparable revenues during the prior periods. We are reorganizing our sales ~~includes~~and marketing efforts around growing within our existing clients and the ~~cost~~areas of operation such as in Oxnard, California, Salinas California and Yuma, Arizona. Our sales restructuring changes are expected to be built around one salaried sales person who will manage existing clients and our commissioned only compensated sales force. Our commissioned only sales staff will be formed through building relationships in the ~~product~~HVAC and cooling tower servicing and installation industry, ~~shipping~~and ~~costs~~will be sold as an add on to their existing and new client sales. This sales plan of expanding in jurisdictions we already is designed to dramatically lower our servicing and travel expenses and to also transition from demonstration type installs to a sales based installations. Although our analysis of these markets and customers show the ability to significantly increase AGT Soft Wave revenues, we have yet to confirm that we are able to sell to these customers and ~~labor~~that ~~cost~~a commission-based sales force can be effective.

~~We remain~~Our incost of sales includes the ~~early~~cost ~~stages~~of the product and labor cost. The cost of ~~developing~~sales ~~customers~~is ~~for~~not ~~our~~expected ~~products~~to ~~and~~change ~~services~~substantially during fiscal 2016, ~~and~~although ~~have~~we ~~issued~~do abelieve ~~number~~we ofare ~~proposals~~underpriced given the savings our products provide to ~~possible~~ our customers. ~~Conversions~~We ofcontinue ~~these~~to ~~pending~~evaluate ~~proposals~~what ~~are~~the ~~possible~~market ~~and~~price ~~would~~should ~~positively~~be ~~impact~~for our ~~revenue~~products ~~trend~~and ~~during~~believe ~~2015.~~may ~~However, given~~increase ~~the~~our ~~uncertainties~~prices ~~associated~~during ~~with~~fiscal ~~securing~~2016 ~~these~~or ~~contracts,~~beyond weas ~~are~~the ~~unable~~value atcontinues ~~this~~to ~~time~~be toproven ~~provide~~via ~~any~~internal ~~forecasts~~data ~~for~~collection, ~~our 2015~~third ~~revenues~~party testing, and customer testimonials.

Our total operating expenses for ~~the~~fiscal ~~six~~2015 ~~months ended June 30, 2014~~ consisted primarily of marketing, selling and administrative expenses, compensation, professional fees, consulting fees, and general and administrative expenses. Included ~~Our~~in our total operating expenses for ~~the six~~fiscal ~~month~~2015 ~~ended~~was ~~June~~approximately 30$2,133,000 ~~2014~~of ~~amounted~~non-cash compensation associated with stock options granted to our management, employees and a board member during fiscal 2015, impairment expense of approximately $~~631~~658,~~188~~000 asand ~~compared~~amortization toexpense of approximately $~~842~~101,~~356~~000 for which there were approximately $48,500 and $0 of comparable expenses during the six months ended June 30, 2014 and for the year ended December 31, 2013, respectively. ~~For~~As of June 30, 2015, our management determined that the ~~period~~ intangible assets related to the assets acquired from ~~February~~Soft ~~14,~~Wave ~~2012~~Inc. ~~(inception)~~were fully impaired and recorded an impairment loss equal to ~~December~~the ~~31,~~aggregate ~~2012,~~carrying ~~our~~value of these assets. Our total operating expenses ~~amounted~~for fiscal 2015 excluding these non-cash expenses increased 185% and 114%, as compared to ~~$201~~the six months ended June 30,~~174~~ 2014 and for the year ended December 31, 2013, respectively. Our operating expenses have increased which are primarily attributable to increases in:

	·	marketing, selling and advertising expenses as well as general and administrative expenses, both of which reflect the continued development of our operations in 2014, and
	·	consulting fees which includes both compensation paid to our executive officers and our non-management director under the terms of consulting agreements, as well as compensation paid to a former officer and director. These increased expenses are also the result of the continued development of our operations in 2014.

	●	marketing, selling and advertising expenses primarily related to demonstration expenses as well as general and administrative expenses, both of which reflected the continued development of our operations in fiscal 2015;

	●	consulting expenses increased during fiscal 2015 and were primarily related to the non-cash value of the stock options granted to our newly appointed board of director in fiscal 2015; and

	●	compensation expense increased as a result of the hiring of new employees of our subsidiary, AGT Soft Wave operations, as well as the hiring of our new CFO in October 2014. These increased expenses were also the result of the continued development of our operations in fiscal 2015.

We expect our expenses in each of these areas to continue to increase during fiscal 2015 and beyond as we expand our operations and begin generating revenues. However, we are unable at this time to estimate the amount of the expected increases.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Liquidity is the ability of a company to generate sufficient cash to satisfy its needs for cash. At June 30, ~~2014~~2015, we had working capital deficit of approximately $~~236,409~~1.2 million as compared to working capital deficit of $~~124~~236,~~621~~000 at ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2013~~2014. ~~Our~~At ~~current assets at~~ June 30, ~~2014~~2015, ~~included cash,~~we ~~inventory~~had ~~and prepaid and other current assets. Prepaid and other current assets primarily represent prepayments for consulting fees, including a prepayment of~~ $10,~~000~~437 in ~~consulting~~cash ~~fees~~as compared to ~~our~~cash ~~Chief~~of ~~Executive Officer~~$24,885 ~~and~~at ~~approximately~~June ~~$15~~30,~~000~~ ~~in prepaid insurance which are being amortized over the terms of the agreements~~2014. Our current ~~liabilities~~assets at June 30, ~~2014~~2015 ~~includes~~decreased ~~accounts payable~~by ~~and~~approximately ~~accrued~~20% ~~liabilities~~and in16% ~~the~~from ~~ordinary~~June ~~course of our business~~30, ~~as well as $100,000 in convertible notes payable. In January~~ 2014 and ~~February 2014 one of the lenders who is our principal stockholder lent us these funds which we used for working capital. We issued the lenders 3% convertible promissory notes which are due on~~ December 31, ~~2014.~~2013, Atrespectively, ~~the~~and ~~option~~included ofaccounts ~~either~~receivable, ~~the holder or our company~~net, ~~the~~inventory ~~principal~~ and ~~accrued~~prepaid ~~interest~~and isother ~~convertible~~current inassets. ~~whole~~Prepaid ~~into~~and ~~shares~~other ofcurrent ~~our~~assets ~~common~~primarily ~~stock~~represent atapproximately ~~a conversion price of~~ $~~0.40~~16,000 ~~per~~in ~~share.~~prepaid Weinsurance ~~expect~~which ~~that~~are ~~these~~being ~~notes~~amortized ~~will~~over bethe ~~converted~~terms ~~prior~~of to the ~~maturity date~~agreements. InAccounts ~~addition to these convertible notes~~receivable, atnet ~~September~~primarily ~~15,~~represents ~~2014~~amounts wedue ~~also~~us ~~owe a total of $463,099~~ under ~~the~~service 3%agreement ~~promissory~~we ~~notes~~acquired ~~which~~in ~~mature~~October on2014 ~~July~~as 1,part ~~2015,~~of ~~including $141,155~~our ~~due~~acquisition toof ~~related~~assets ~~parties,~~from ~~which~~Soft ~~represent~~Wave ~~working capital loans made to us. We do not presently have sufficient funds to repay these obligations. As~~ described ~~earlier~~elsewhere in this report~~, we need to raise approximately $1~~.3 At ~~million~~June of30, ~~additional capital~~2015, a ~~portion~~our ofinventory ~~which~~declined ~~will~~54% beand ~~allocated~~62% tofrom ~~repay~~June ~~these~~30, ~~obligations.~~2014 ~~While~~and weDecember do31, ~~not~~2013 ~~have any commitments for this capital~~respectively, weprimarily ~~will seek~~as toa ~~raise~~result ~~it though the sale~~ of ~~our~~servicing ~~equity securities in~~ a ~~private placement~~contract. These Ifchemicals wehave ~~are~~not ~~unable~~been toreplaced ~~raise~~due ~~the capital as needed, we will seek~~ to ~~restructure~~lack ~~the payment terms~~ of ~~these~~working ~~obligations~~capital.

1415

~~Net cash~~Our ~~used~~current ~~for~~liabilities ~~operating~~at ~~activities~~June ~~was approximately $425~~30,~~000~~ ~~for~~2015 ~~the~~increased ~~six~~by ~~months~~232% ~~ended~~from June 30, 2014 and included our accounts payable and accrued liabilities in the ordinary course of our business, as ~~compared~~well as $723,450 in notes payable, $50,000 loan payable and $92,500 due to ~~approximately~~ related parties. Included in these obligations are convertible notes in the principal amount of $~~850~~100,000. ~~for~~At the ~~year~~option ~~ended~~of ~~December~~either 31the holder or our company, ~~2013~~the principal and ~~net~~accrued ~~cash~~interest ~~used~~is ~~for~~convertible ~~operating~~in ~~activities~~whole ~~for~~into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $ 0.40 per share. As of the ~~period~~date of this report we have not received conversion notices from ~~February~~any 14of the note holders. These promissory notes matured on July 1, ~~2012 (inception)~~2015 and are expected to ~~December~~be 31renewed by the holders. Additionally, ~~2012~~between ~~was~~November 2014 and June 2015 our former COO, CFO and CEO provided advances to us for a total of approximately $~~294~~95,000 for working capital purposes and currently has an outstanding balance of $92,500. These advances are due on demand and bear no interest. As described elsewhere herein, we do not have sufficient funds to repay these obligations.

Net cash used in operating activities was approximately $817,000 for fiscal 2015 as compared to approximately $425,000 and $850,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and for the year ended December 31, 2013 respectively.

During fiscal 2015 cash was used as follows:

	●	net loss was approximately $4.1 million , and
	●	an increase in our accounts receivable of approximately $64,000, and
	●	a decrease in our inventory, prepaid expenses and other current assets of approximately $82,000 and an increase in our accounts payable and accrued expenses of approximately $377,000, partially offset by a
	●	non-cash operating expenses of amortization and depreciation of approximately $120,000, impairment expense of $658,000 and stock based compensation of approximately $2.1 million.

During the six months ended June 30, 2014 period cash was used as follows:

·● net loss was approximately $555,000, and ● a decrease in our inventory of approximately $21,000, ● an increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets of approximately $20,000 and an increase in our accounts payable and accrued expenses of approximately $80,000, partially offset by a ● non-cash operating expenses of approximately $53,000.

· a decrease in our inventory of approximately $21,000, an increase in prepaid expenses and other current assets of approximately $20,000 and an increase in our accounts payable and accrued expenses of approximately $80,000, partially offset by a

· non-cash operating expenses of approximately $53,000.

During the year ended December 31, 2013 period cash was used as follows:

·● net loss was approximately $842,000, and ● an increase in our inventory of approximately $46,000 and accounts payable and accrued expenses of approximately $33,000, partially offset by a ● non-cash operating expenses of approximately $8,000.

·Net ancash ~~increase~~used in ~~our~~investing ~~inventory~~activities which relates to the purchase of property and equipment for fiscal 2015 was approximately $4546,000 ~~and~~as ~~accounts~~compared ~~payable~~to approximately $23,000 and ~~accrued~~$24,000 ~~expenses~~for ofthe ~~approximately~~six ~~$33~~months ended June 30,~~000,~~ ~~partially~~2014 ~~offset~~and byfor athe year ended December 31, 2013 respectively.

·Net ~~non-~~cash ~~operating~~provided ~~expenses~~by financing activities for fiscal 2015 was approximately $849,000 as compared to approximately $457,000 and $872,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and for the year ended December 31, 2013 respectively. During fiscal 2015, we received proceeds of approximately $8414,000 from the issuance of the 3% notes, $50,000 for loans payable, $292,000 from the issuance of our common stock and related party advances of $96,000. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, approximately $457,000 of these funds were primarily advances to us by our then parent company and have subsequently been forgiven. Additionally, we received gross proceeds of $290,000 from the issuance of notes during the six months ended June 30, 2014. During the year ended December 31, 2013, approximately $872,000 of these funds were primarily advances to us by our then parent company, have subsequently been forgiven and have been reclassified as equity contributions.

~~During the period from February 14, 2012 (inception) to December 31, 2012, cash was used as follows:~~16

· net loss was approximately $201,000, partially offset by

· an increase in our inventory of approximately $87,000 and cash-operating expenses of approximately $6,600, partially offset by a

· non-cash operating expenses of approximately $1,300.

Net cash used in investing activities was approximately $23,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to approximately $24,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013, net cash used in investing activities was approximately $18,900 for the period from February 14, 2012 (inception) to December 31, 2012 and primarily reflects our purchase of additional equipment in all periods.

Net cash provided by financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2014 was approximately $457,000 as compared to approximately $872,000 for the year ended December 31, 2013. Net cash provided by financing activities for the period from February 14, 2012 (inception) to December 31, 2012 was approximately $329,000. In all periods, these funds were primarily advances to us by our then parent company, and have subsequently been forgiven.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. We believe the critical accounting policies in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this report affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions and conditions.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The recent accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) or other standards-setting bodies that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements upon adoption.

Off Balance Sheet Arrangements

As of the date of this report, we do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors. The term “off-balance sheet arrangement” generally means any transaction, agreement or other contractual arrangement to which an entity unconsolidated with us is a party, under which we have any obligation arising under a guarantee contract, derivative instrument or variable interest or a retained or contingent interest in assets transferred to such entity or similar arrangement that serves as credit, liquidity or market risk support for such assets.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

Not applicable for a smaller reporting company.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

Please see our Financial Statements beginning on page F-1 of this annual report.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We are required to maintain “disclosure controls and procedures” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, our Chief Executive Officer who also serves as our principal financial and accounting officer, has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that the information relating to our company, required to be disclosed in our Securities and Exchange Commission reports (i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure as a result of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting described below.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:

· pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

· provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

· provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of the inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2014. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Management’s assessment included an evaluation of the design of our internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of these controls. Based on this assessment, our management has concluded that as of June 30, 2014, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles as a result of material weaknesses, due to the following:

· Deficiencies in segregation of duties. Lack of proper segregation of functions, duties and responsibilities with respect to our cash and control over the disbursements related thereto due to our very limited staff, including our accounting personnel.

· Deficiencies in the staffing of our financial accounting department. The number of qualified accounting personnel with experience in public company SEC reporting and GAAP is limited and we are reliant upon the services of a part-time accounting consultant. This weakness does not enable us to maintain adequate controls over our financial accounting and reporting processes regarding the accounting for non-routine and non-systematic transactions. There is a risk that a material misstatement of the financial statements could be caused, or at least not be detected in a timely manner, by this shortage of qualified resources.

In light of the existence of these deficiencies, our management concluded that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by our company’s internal controls. As part of the preparation of this report, we have applied compensating procedures and processes as necessary to ensure the reliability of our financial reporting.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

The following table provides information on our current executive officers and directors.

Name	Age	Positions
Michael C. Boyko	42	Director, President, Chief Executive Officer, principal financial and accounting officer
Ricardo A. Barbosa	43	Director, Chief Operating Officer and Secretary
James Mack	80	Director

~~Michael C.~~AMERICA ~~Boyko.~~GREENER ~~Mr. Boyko has been an executive officer and member of our board of directors since March 19~~TECHNOLOGIES, ~~2014~~INC. InAND addition, he has served as a member of the board of directors, President and Chief Executive Officer of AGT since February 2012. He has been a director since April 2009 for Royal Mines and Minerals Corporation (OTCBB: RYMM) and served as its Director of Operations from April 2009 until May 2012. He is President and Chief Executive Officer of Matmown Inc. (OTCQB Pink: MTMW), a small mining company, having served in the position originally from April 2012 until February 2013, and then most recently since June 2013. He is also currently President of Advanced Integrated Resources, LLC (AIR LLC), a privately-held company he founded in 2003. In October 2004, he created Advanced Industrial Conveyors under AIR LLC to design, manufacture, market and sell process equipment to the mining and power industry. From 2001 to 2003, Mr. Boyko was employed at T.A. Caid Industries, a privately held company where he developed a new business segment focused on equipment representation and sales to mines and power plants. From 1998 to 2001, Mr. Boyko was a managing partner and vice president of business development of BME Engineering, a privately held company that focused on air pollution control technologies and industrial process equipment for mines and power plants, where he managed sales, marketing and manufacturing. Mr. Boyko is a member of the Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration as well as being Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) certified. Mr. Boyko obtained his Bachelor of Science in Finance from Arizona State University and is a member of the AMIGOS – Arizona Mining Association.SUBSIDIARIES

Ricardo A. Barbosa. Mr. Barbosa has been an executive officer and member of our board of directors since March 19, 2014. He has served as Chief Operating Officer of AGT since December 2013. He joined AGT in January 2013, and has previously served as its Marketing and Fabrication Manager and the General Manager North America before being promoted to Chief Operating Officer. In March 2008, he founded Energetics, LLC, an industrial manufacturing consulting firm. Mr. Barbosa is a bi-lingual business professional with over 25 years of experience in the electrical, mechanical and computer driven technology and engineering fields. He is an accredited Microsoft Certified Systems Engineer (M.C.S.E.), and Cisco Certified Network Associate (C.C.N.A.).

James Mack. Mr. Mack has been a member of the board of directors since March 19, 2014. Until his retirement from public office in 1982, Mr. Mack served six terms in the Arizona State Senate where his leadership roles included President Pro Tem, Whip, President of the Western Legislative Conference and founding board member and officer of the American Legislative Exchange Council. Mr. Mack was the first recipient of the Thomas Jefferson Award, the most prestigious award given for patriotism and delivery of the ideals of the organization’s mission. During his terms, he served as Chairman of the Arizona Solar Energy Commission, the Arizona Solid Waste Study Committee, the Arizona Environmental Quality Study Committee, the Natural Resources Development Committee, and the Natural Resources Sanding Committee, among other positions. Mr. Mack is involved in multiple natural resource development groups and is a key lobbyist for uranium and coal development. Since December 2012, he has provided business development, community, government and corporate consulting services to a variety of clients, including as a lobbyist for American Clean Energy Resource Trust, at Knab, Utah (February 2009 until May 2013), a representative of Manex Resource Group, Vancouver, B.C. (October 2006 until April 2012) and a lobbyist for Quaterra Alaska Inc. (April 2008 until February 2009). Mr. Mack is a graduate of Arizona State University.

There are no family relationships between any of the executive officers and directors. Each director is elected at our annual meeting of stockholders and holds office until the next annual meeting of stockholders, or until his successor is elected and qualified.

Director Qualifications, Board Leadership Structure and Risk Management

Prior to the closing of the acquisition of AGT we were a “shell company” as that term is defined in the Securities Act. Following that transaction, our business and operations are now those of AGT. Messrs. Boyko, Barbosa and Mack, the members of our board of directors, were appointed to our Board in March 2014 following the acquisition of AGT. AGT is a small, early stage company that until March 2014 was a privately held company. Mr. Boyko was one of the founders of AGT and Mr. Barbosa has been employed by AGT since January 2013, serving in a number of positions before being named Chief Operating Officer in December 2013. Both Mr. Boyko and Mr. Barbosa have significant professional experience in fields related to or synergistic with AGT’s business. Mr. Mack’s focus while in the Arizona State Senate and his subsequent consulting and lobbying efforts have been directly related to industries which we view as potential customers. Mr. Boyko’s role in co-founding AGT and their respective professional experience led our Board to conclude each of them should be serving as a director of our company.

Risk is inherent with every business, and how well a business manages risk can ultimately determine its success. We face a number of risks, including liquidity risk, operational risk, strategic risk and reputation risk. Mr. Boyko serves as both our Chief Executive Officer and as one of the three members of our board of directors. We do not have any independent directors. The business and operations of our company are managed by our Board as a whole, including oversight of various risks, such as operational and liquidity risks that our company faces. As our company grows, we expect to expand our board of directors to include independent directors.

Committees of the Board of Directors

We have not established any committees, including an Audit Committee, a Compensation Committee or a Nominating Committee, or any other committee performing a similar function. The functions of those committees are being undertaken by board of directors as a whole. Because we do not have any independent directors, we believe that the establishment of these committees at this time would be more form over substance.

We do not have a policy regarding the consideration of any director candidates which may be recommended by our stockholders, including the minimum qualifications for director candidates, nor has our board of directors established a process for identifying and evaluating director nominees, nor do we have a policy regarding director diversity. We have not adopted a policy regarding the handling of any potential recommendation of director candidates by our stockholders, including the procedures to be followed. Our Board has not considered or adopted any of these policies as we have never received a recommendation from any stockholder for any candidate to serve on our board of directors. Given our status as an early stage company, we do not anticipate that any of our stockholders will make such a recommendation until at such time as we have significantly expanded our revenues and operations. Even then, we do not know if any of our stockholders will make a recommendation for any candidate to serve on our Board given the relatively small size of our company. As set forth above, in the future we expect to expand our Board to include independent directors. While there have been no nominations of additional directors proposed, in the event such a proposal is made, all members of our Board will participate in the consideration of director nominees. In considering a director nominee, it is likely that our Board will consider the professional and/or educational background of any nominee with a view towards how this person might bring a different viewpoint or experience to our Board.

None of our directors is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of Item 401(e) of Regulation S-K. In general, an “audit committee financial expert” is an individual member of the audit committee or board of directors who:

· understands generally accepted accounting principles and financial statements,

· is able to assess the general application of such principles in connection with accounting for estimates, accruals and reserves,

· has experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial statements comparable to the breadth and complexity of our financial statements,

· understands internal controls over financial reporting, and

· understands audit committee functions.

Our securities are not quoted on an exchange that has requirements that a majority of our Board members be independent and we are not currently otherwise subject to any law, rule or regulation requiring that all or any portion of our board of directors include “independent” directors, nor are we required to establish or maintain an Audit Committee or other committee of our board of directors.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

In March 2014 our board of directors adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics which applies to our board of directors, our executive officers and our employees, outlines the broad principles of ethical business conduct we adopted, covering subject areas such as:

· compliance with applicable laws and regulations,

· handling of books and records,

· public disclosure reporting,

· insider trading,

· discrimination and harassment,

· health and safety,

· conflicts of interest,

· competition and fair dealing, and

· protection of company assets.

Our board of directors believed it was necessary to adopt the expanded code to more appropriately address the needs of an operating company. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is filed as Exhibit 14.1 to this Current Report. A copy of our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available without charge, to any person desiring a copy of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, by written request to us at our principal offices at 254 South Mulberry Street, Suite 113, Meza, AZ 85202.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of a registered class of our equity securities to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission initial statements of beneficial ownership, reports of changes in ownership and annual reports concerning their ownership of our common shares and other equity securities, on Forms 3, 4 and 5 respectively. Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders are required by the Securities and Exchange Commission regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file. Based on our review of the copies of such forms received by us, and to the best of our knowledge, all executive officers, directors and persons holding greater than 10% of our issued and outstanding stock have filed the required reports in a timely manner during fiscal 2014.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The following table summarizes all compensation recorded by us in the past two years for:

· our principal executive officer or other individual serving in a similar capacity,

· our two most highly compensated executive officers other than our principal executive officer who were serving as executive officers at June 30, 2014 as that term is defined under Rule B-7 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

· up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been required but for the fact that the individual was not serving as an executive officer at June 30, 2014.

For definitional purposes, these individuals are sometimes referred to as the “named executive officers.”

Summary Compensation Table
Name and principal position	Year	Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($) (1)		No equity incentive plan compensation ($)		Non-qualified deferred compensation earnings ($)		All other compensation ($)		Total ($)
Michael C. Boyko (1)	2014		0		0		0		0		0		0		60,000		60,000
	2013		0		0		0		0		0		0		120,000		120,000
C. Leo Smith (2)	2013		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0
	2012		0		0		0		0		0		0		0		0

(1) Mr. Boyko has served as our President and Chief Executive Officer since March 2014. Compensation for the year ended December 31, 2013 and for the six months ended June 30, 2014 reflects amounts paid to Mr. Boyko by AGT under a consulting agreement.

(2) Mr. Smith served as President from July 2009 until March 2014.

How the executive’s compensation is determined

We were not a party to an employment agreement with Mr. Smith.

AGT is a party to an Independent Contractor Agreement dated January 1, 2013 with Mr. Boyko. As compensation, AGT pays Mr. Boyko a fee of $10,000 per month and reimbursement for out of pocket travel expenses. We expect to enter into an employment agreement with Mr. Boyko in the future; however, the terms and conditions of this agreement, including the compensation payable to him, has not been negotiated as of the date of this report.

Outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end

The following table provides information concerning unexercised options, stock that has not vested and equity incentive plan awards for each named executive officer outstanding as of June 30, 2014:

OPTION AWARDS STOCK AWARDS Name Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#) Option Exercise Price ($) Option Expiration Date Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#) Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($) Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights that Have Not Vested (#) Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#) Michael C. Boyko — — — — — — — — — C. Leo Smith — — — — — — — — —

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

At September 18, 2014, we had 19, 005,014 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding which is our only class of voting securities. The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of September 18, 2014 by:

· each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock;

· each of our directors;

· each of our named executive officers; and

· our named executive officers, directors and director nominees as a group.

Unless otherwise indicated, the business address of each person listed is in care of 254 South Mulberry Street, Suite 113, Meza, AZ 85202. The percentages in the table have been calculated on the basis of treating as outstanding for a particular person, all shares of our common stock outstanding on that date and all shares of our common stock issuable to that holder in the event of exercise of outstanding options, warrants, rights or conversion privileges owned by that person at that date which are exercisable within 60 days of that date. Except as otherwise indicated, the persons listed below have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of our common stock owned by them, except to the extent that power may be shared with a spouse.

Name of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership		% of Class
Michael C. Boyko		2,724,921		14.3	%
Ricardo A. Barbosa		358,543		≤1	%
James Mack (1)		143,417		≤1	%
All officers and directors as a group (three persons)(1)		3,226,881		17.0	%
Insurance Marketing Solutions, LLC (2)		1,822,601		9.6	%
Pacific Venture Marketing Corporation (3)		3,668,096		19.2	%
James Corrigan (4)		1,312,335		6.8	%
Russell Corrigan (5)		1,147,335		6.0	%
Admiral House Limited (6)		1,003,918		5.3	%

(1) The number of shares beneficially owned by Mr. Mack are held of record by Mack Family Revocable Trust. Mr. Mack holds voting and dispositive control over these shares.

(2) Mr. C. Leo Smith, formerly our sole officer and director, holds voting and dispositive control over these shares. Insurance Marketing Solutions, LLC’s address is 900 SE Third Avenue, Suite 202, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316.

(3) The number of shares owned by Pacific Venture Marketing Corporation includes 85,000 shares issuable upon the conversion of a 3% convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $36,000 which matures in June 2014. Mr. John P. Mooney holds voting and dispositive control over shares owned by Pacific Venture Marketing Corporation. Mr. Mooney served as an executive officer and member of the board of directors of AGT, and is an executive officer and member of the board of directors of AGT Canada. Mr. Mooney resigned his positions with AGT on March 17, 2014. Pacific Venture Marketing Corporation’s address is 36-5531 Cornwall Drive, Richmond, BC, Canada V7C 5N7.

(4) The number of shares owned by Mr. Corrigan includes 165,000 shares issuable upon the conversion of a 3% convertible promissory note in the principal amount of $64,000 which matures in June 2014. Mr. Corrigan’s address is 15572 Columbia Avenue, White Rock, BC Canada V4B 1K6.

(5) Mr. Corrigan’s address is 15168 – 36 Avenue, Unit 32, Surrey, BC Canada V3S 0Z6.

(6) Admiral House Limited’s address is Loyalist Plaza, Don Markey Boulevard, Marsh Harbour, Abaco, Bahamas.

Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans

The following table sets forth securities authorized for issuance under any equity compensation plans approved by our stockholders as well as any equity compensation plans not approved by our stockholders as of June 30, 2014.

Number of securities

remaining available

Number of securities

for future issuance

to be issued upon

under equity

exercise of

Weighted average

compensation plans

outstanding options,

exercise price of

(excluding securities

warrants and rights

outstanding options,

reflected in column

Plan category

(a)

warrants and rights

(a))

Plans approved by our stockholders: 2014 Equity Compensation Plan

—

3,000,000

Plans not approved by stockholders:

—

2014 Equity Compensation Plan

On March 19, 2014, our board of directors authorized our 2014 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2014 Plan”) covering 3,000,000 shares of common stock. The 2014 Plan also contains an “evergreen formula” pursuant to which the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2014 Plan will automatically increase on the first trading day of January each calendar year during the term of the 2014 Plan, beginning with calendar year 2015, by an amount equal to 1% of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding on the last trading day in December of the immediately preceding calendar year, up to a maximum annual increase of 200,000 shares of common stock. The purpose of the 2014 Plan is to enable us to offer to our employees, officers, directors and consultants, whose past, present and/or potential contributions to our company have been, are or will be important to our success, an opportunity to acquire a proprietary interest in our company. The 2014 Plan is administered by our board of directors. Plan options may either be:

· incentive stock options (ISOs),

· non-qualified options (NSOs),

· awards of our common stock, or

· rights to make direct purchases of our common stock which may be subject to certain restrictions.

Any option granted under the 2014 Plan must provide for an exercise price of not less than 100% of the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant, but the exercise price of any ISO granted to an eligible employee owning more than 10% of our outstanding common stock must not be less than 110% of fair market value on the date of the grant. The plan further provides that with respect to ISOs the aggregate fair market value of the common stock underlying the options which are exercisable by any option holder during any calendar year cannot exceed $100,000. The term of each plan option and the manner in which it may be exercised is determined by the board of directors or the compensation committee, provided that no option may be exercisable more than 10 years after the date of its grant and, in the case of an incentive option granted to an eligible employee owning more than 10% of the common stock, no more than five years after the date of the grant. In the event of any stock split of our outstanding common stock, the board of directors in its discretion may elect to maintain the stated amount of shares reserved under the plan without giving effect to such stock split. Subject to the limitation on the aggregate number of shares issuable under the plan, there is no maximum or minimum number of shares as to which a stock grant or plan option may be granted to any person.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

From time to time AGT Canada, then AGT’s parent company, advanced AGT funds for working capital. These advances, which totaled $1,201,261 for 2013, were due on demand. AGT Canada has forgiven these advances, as well as all amounts advanced to AGT up to the closing of our acquisition of AGT on March 19, 2014.

During 2013 AGT paid Mr. John P. Mooney consulting fees of $125,000 for services to us. Mr. Mooney, who was an officer and director of AGT until just prior to our acquisition of that company in March 2014, is a principal stockholder of our company, holding his interests through Pacific Venture Marketing Corp.

AGT is a party to an Independent Contractors Agreement dated January 1, 2013 with Mr. Mack. In addition to his role as a member of our board of directors, Mr. Mack is AGT’s environmental and governmental liaison. As compensation, AGT pays Mr. Mack a fee of $4,000 per month and reimbursement for out of pocket travel expenses. During 2013 AGT paid Mr. Mack total consulting fees of $48,000. This agreement contains customary confidentiality provisions and may be terminated by either party upon 30 days notice.

In January 2014 and February 2014 Mr. James Corrigan and Pacific Venture Marketing Corporation lent AGT an aggregate of $100,000. AGT used these funds for working capital. One of the lenders is a principal shareholder of our company. In March 2014 AGT issued 3% convertible promissory notes to each of Mr. Corrigan and Pacific Venture Marketing Corporation evidencing these advances. The notes are unsecured and the principal and accrued interest was initially due on June 30, 2014. In August 2014, effective June 30, 2014, the lenders extended the due dates of the notes until December 31, 2015. At the option of either the holder or AGT, the principal and accrued interest is convertible in whole into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $0.40 per share.

In January 2014, Mr. Barbosa, our Chief Operating Officer, advanced AGT $5,000 for working capital. The advance, which was due on demand and interest free, was repaid in January 2014. In May 2014, Mr. Barbosa advanced $10,000 to us for working capital. The May 2014 advance, which was due on demand and bore 3% interest, was repaid in May 2014.

Between May 2014 and August 2014 Pacific Ventures Marketing Corporation lent us an additional $116,155 under the terms of 3% promissory notes which mature on July 1, 2015. We used these funds for working capital.

Director Independence

None of our directors are considered “independent” within the meaning of meaning of Rule 5605 of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

The following table shows the fees that were billed for the audit and other services provided by our independent registered public accounting firms for fiscal 2014 and fiscal 2013.

	Fiscal 2014		Fiscal 2013
Audit Fees	$	25,000	$	12,643
Audit-Related Fees		0		0
Tax Fees		0		0
All Other Fees		0		0
Total	$	25,000	$	12,643

Audit Fees — This category includes the audit of our annual financial statements, review of financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and services that are normally provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in connection with engagements for those fiscal years. This category also includes advice on audit and accounting matters that arose during, or as a result of, the audit or the review of interim financial statements.

Audit-Related Fees — This category consists of assurance and related services by the independent registered public accounting firm that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported above under “Audit Fees.” The services for the fees disclosed under this category include consultation regarding our correspondence with the Securities and Exchange Commission and other accounting consulting.

Tax Fees — This category consists of professional services rendered by our independent registered public accounting firm for tax compliance and tax advice. The services for the fees disclosed under this category include tax return preparation and technical tax advice.

All Other Fees — This category consists of fees for other miscellaneous items.

Our board of directors has adopted a procedure for pre-approval of all fees charged by our independent registered public accounting firm. Under the procedure, the Board approves the engagement letter with respect to audit, tax and review services. Other fees are subject to pre-approval by the Board, or, in the period between meetings, by a designated member of the Board. Any such approval by the designated member is disclosed to the entire Board at the next meeting. The audit and tax fees paid to the auditors with respect to fiscal 2014 were pre-approved by the entire board of directors.

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

(a)(1) Financial statements.

· Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

· Consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013

· Consolidated statements of operations for six months ended June 30, 2014, the year ended December 31, 2013 and for the period from February 14, 2012 (inception) to December 31, 2012,

· Consolidated statements of cash flows for six months ended June 30, 2014, for the year ended December 31, 2013 and for the period from February 14, 2012 (inception) to December 31, 2012,

	·	Consolidated statement of changes in stockholders’ equity at June 30, 2014
	·	Notes to consolidated financial statements

(b) Exhibits.

3.1		Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to the registration statement on Form S-1, SEC File No. 333-146163, declared effective by the SEC on October 5, 2007 (the “S-1”))
3.2		Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K as filed on June 22, 2010)
3.3		Bylaws (incorporated by reference to the S-1)
10.1		Form of Share Exchange Agreement Form of Share Exchange Agreement dated February 25, 2014 by and among Osler Incorporated, America Greener Technologies Incorporated and the shareholders of America Greener Technologies Incorporated (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 27, 2014) ***
10.2		Independent Contractor Agreement dated January 1, 2013 by and between American Greener Technologies Corporation and Michael C. Boyko (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2014)
10.3		Independent Contractor Agreement dated January 1, 2013 by and between American Greener Technologies Corporation and Energetics Consulting, LLC (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2014)
10.4		Independent Contractor Agreement dated January 1, 2013 by and between American Greener Technologies Corporation and James Mack (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2014)
10.5		Licensing Agreement dated February 12, 2014 by and among Polarchem Associates Limited, Polarchem International Limited, America Greener Technologies Corporation, Ulf Tore Walden, David H. Idwal Jones and Georges Berberat (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2014)***
10.6		Consulting Agreement dated December 20, 2013 by and between America Greener Technologies Corporation and PAN Consultants Ltd. (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2014)
10.7		2014 Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2014)
10.8		Lease Agreement dated February 8, 2012 by and between America Greener Technologies Corporation and MP Mulberry, LLC (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2014)
10.9		3% convertible promissory note dated March 17, 2014 in the principal amount of $64,000 payable to James Corrigan (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2014)
10.10		3% convertible promissory note dated March 17, 2014 in the principal amount of $36,000 due Pacific Venture Marketing Corporation (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2014)
10.11		Addendum to Lease Agreement dated May 1, 2014 by and between America Greener Technologies, Inc. and MP Mulberry LLC *
14.1		Code Business Conduct and Ethics adopted March 19, 2014 (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2014)
16.1		Letter dated March 20, 2014 from Thomas W. Klash, CPA (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2014)

31.1		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer *
31.2		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of principal financial and accounting officer *
32.1		Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and principal financial and accounting officer*
101.INS		XBRL Instance Document**
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase **
101.LAE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase **
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase **
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema **

* filed herewith.

** In accordance with Regulation S-T, the XBRL-formatted interactive data files that comprise Exhibit 101 to this report shall be deemed furnished and not filed.

*** Schedules omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. Osler Incorporated agrees to furnish a supplemental copy of any omitted schedule to the SEC upon request.

**** Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Commission under Rule 24b-2. The omitted confidential material has been filed separately with the Commission. The location of the omitted confidential information is indicated in the exhibit with asterisks (***).

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	America Greener Technologies, Inc.
September 25, 2014	By:	/s/ Michael C. Boyko
	Michael C. Boyko, Chief Executive Officer, principal financial and accounting officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Name	Positions	Date
/s/ Michael C. Boyko	Chief Executive Officer, director,	September 25, 2014
Michael C. Boyko	principal executive officer and
	principal financial and accounting
	officer
/s/ Ricardo A. Barbosa	Chief Operating Officer and director	September 25, 2014
Ricardo A. Barbosa
/s/ James Mack	Director	September 25, 2014
James Mack

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2014

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, ~~2014~~2015

CONTENTS

Consolidated Financial Statements:

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm	F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets - As of June 30, 2014, December 31, 2013 and 2012	F-3
Consolidated Balance Sheets - As of June 30, 2015, June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013	F-3
Consolidated Statement of Operations -
Consolidated Statement of Operations - For the Year Ended June 30, 2015, for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and for the Year Ended December 31, 2013	F-4
For the Six months ended June 30, 2014, for the Year Ended December 31, 2013, and for the Period from February 14, 2012 (Inception) to December 31, 2012	F-4
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) - For the Year Ended June 30, 2015, for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and for the Year Ended December 31, 2013	F-5
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit) -
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows – For the Year Ended June 30, 2015, for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014 and for the Year Ended December 31, 2013	F-6
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014, for the Year Ended December 31, 2013 and for the Period from February 14, 2012 (Inception) to December 31, 2012	F-5
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-7
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows –
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014, for the Year Ended December 31, 2013 and for the Period from February 14, 2012 (Inception) to December 31, 2012	F-6
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements	F-7 to F-16

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the ~~Stockholders~~Stockholder and Board of Directors

America Greener Technologies, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of America Greener Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2015, June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013 ~~and~~ ~~2012~~ and the related consolidated statements of operations, ~~and consolidated~~ changes in stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for the ~~six~~year ~~months~~ ended June 30, ~~2014~~2015, for the ~~year~~six months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2013~~2014, and for the ~~period~~year ~~from~~ended ~~February 14, 2012 (Inception) to~~ December 31, ~~2012~~2013. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’'s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’'s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of America Greener Technologies, Inc. and Subsidiaries as of June 30, 2015, June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013 and ~~2012 and~~ the results of their operations and their cash flows for the ~~six~~year ~~months~~ ended June 30, ~~2014~~2015, for the ~~year~~six months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2013~~2014, and for the ~~period~~year ~~from~~ended ~~February 14, 2012 (Inception) to~~ December 31, ~~2012~~2013 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred net losses of $~~555~~4,~~302~~132,834, $~~842~~555,~~356~~302, and $~~201~~842,~~174~~356 for the ~~six months~~year ended June 30, ~~2014~~2015, for the ~~year~~six months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2013~~2014, and for the ~~period~~year ~~from~~ended ~~February 14, 2012 (Inception) to~~ December 31, ~~2012~~2013, respectively and the Company had cash used in operations of $816,625, $424,517, and $849,997 ~~and~~for ~~$293~~the year ended June 30,~~834~~ 2015, for the six months ended June 30, 2014, and for the year ended December 31, 2013, ~~and~~respectively. ~~for~~Additionally, the ~~period~~Company ~~from~~has ~~February~~an ~~14,~~accumulated ~~2012~~deficit ~~(Inception)~~of toapproximately ~~December~~5.7 31million at June 30, ~~2012~~2015. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regards to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

	/s/ D’Arelli Pruzansky, P.A.
	Certified Public Accountants
Boca Raton, Florida
September 25, 2014

/s/ D’Arelli Pruzansky, P.A.

Certified Public Accountants

Boca Raton, Florida

October 13, 2015

F-2

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND ~~SUBSIDIARY~~ SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	June 30,			~~December~~June 3130,			December 31,
	2014			2013			2012
	2015			2014			2013
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash	$	2410,~~885~~437		$	1524,~~006~~885		$	1615,~~094~~006
Inventory		111,619			132,889			87,370
Accounts receivable		54,217			-			-
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		29,888			10,028			6,619
Inventory		51,093			111,619			132,889
Total current assets		166,392			157,923			110,083
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		16,699			29,888			10,028
Total current assets		132,446			166,392			157,923
Other assets:
Property and equipment, net		4976,~~641~~723			3149,~~510~~641			1531,~~928~~510
Trademark		1,601			1,601			1,601
Intangible assets, net		1,601			1,601			1,601
Deposit		3,500			—3,500			—-
Total other assets		5481,~~742~~824			3354,~~111~~742			1733,~~529~~111
Total assets	$	~~221~~214,~~134~~270		$	~~191~~221,~~034~~134		$	~~127~~191,~~612~~034
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	~~112~~470,~~890~~301		$	33112,~~302~~890		$	—33,302
Convertible notes payable - related party		100,000			—			—
Convertible notes payable - related parties		100,000			100,000			-
Notes payable		~~144~~400,~~960~~091			—144,960			—-
Notes payable - related party		44223,~~951~~359			—44,951			—-
Due to related party		—			—			328,785
Loans payable		50,000			-			-
Total current liabilities		402,801			33,302			328,785
Due to related parties		92,500			-			-
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)
Total current liabilities		1,336,251			402,801			33,302
Stockholders’ equity (deficit):
Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized: none shares issued and outstanding		—			—			—
Stockholders' equity (deficit):
Common stock, $0.001, 75,000,000 shares authorized: 19,005,014 shares, 15,000,000 shares and 15,000,000 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014, December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively		19,005			15,000			15,000
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares
Additional paid in capital		1,398,160			1,186,262			(14,999	)
authorized: none shares issued and outstanding		-			-			-
Accumulated deficit		(1,598,832	)		(1,043,530	)		(201,174	)
Common stock, $0.001, 75,000,000 shares
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)		(181,667	)		157,732			(201,173	)
authorized: 20,484,848 shares, 19,005,014 shares and 15,000,000 shares
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity (deficit)	$	221,134		$	191,034		$	127,612
issued and outstanding at June 30, 2015, June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively		20,485			19,005			15,000
Additional paid in capital		4,589,200			1,398,160			1,186,262
Accumulated deficit		(5,731,666	)		(1,598,832	)		(1,043,530	)
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)		(1,121,981	)		(181,667	)		157,732
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)	$	214,270		$	221,134		$	191,034

See accompanying notes to ~~the~~ consolidated financial statements.

F-3

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND ~~SUBSIDIARY~~SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

							FOR THE PERIOD FROM
	FOR THE YEAR			FOR THE SIX MONTHS			FOR THE YEAR
	FOR THE SIX MONTHS			FOR THE YEAR			FEBRUARY 14, 2012
	ENDED JUNE 30, 2015			ENDED JUNE 30, 2014			ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013
	ENDED			ENDED			(INCEPTION) TO
Revenues
	JUNE 30, 2014			DECEMBER 31, 2013			DECEMBER 31, 2012
Net revenues - products	$	16,646		$	-		$	-
Net revenues - services	$	~~114~~753,619		$	—114,619		$	—-
Cost of revenues - services		36,511			—			—
Total revenues		770,265			114,619			-
Gross profit		78,108			—			—
Cost of revenues
Cost of revenues - products		21,077			-			-
Cost of revenues - services		169,412			36,511			-
Total cost of revenues		190,489			36,511			-
Gross profit		579,776			78,108			-
Operating expenses:
Depreciation		4,787			7,985			1,329
Amortization and depreciation		116,757			4,787			7,985
Marketing, selling and advertising expenses		4135,~~200~~129			~~116~~4,~~545~~200			12116,~~945~~545
Compensation expense		~~135~~2,~~250~~497,246			24135,~~155~~250			—24,155
Professional fees		~~128~~232,~~612~~290			22128,~~729~~612			~~239~~22,729
Consulting fees		~~248~~755,~~876~~122			~~458~~248,~~076~~876			91458,~~927~~076
General and administrative		109,463			212,866			94,734
Loss on impairment of intangible asset		657,693			-			-
Total operating expenses		631,188			842,356			201,174
General and administrative		298,784			109,463			212,866
Loss from operations		(553,080	)		(842,356	)		(201,174	)
Total operating expenses		4,693,021			631,188			842,356
Loss from operations		(4,113,245	)		(553,080	)		(842,356	)
Other expense
Interest expense		(219,~~222~~589	)		—(2,222	)		—-
Total other expense		(219,~~222~~589	)		—(2,222	)		—-
Loss before provision for income taxes		(~~555~~4,~~302~~132,834	)		(~~842~~555,~~356~~302	)		(~~201~~842,~~174~~356	)
Provision for income taxes		—-			—-			—-
Net loss	$	(~~555~~4,~~302~~132,834	)	$	(~~842~~555,~~356~~302	)	$	(~~201~~842,~~174~~356	)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE COMMON SHARES
Basic and Diluted		1719,~~276~~875,~~362~~952			817,~~000~~276,~~000~~362			8,000,000
NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE:
OUTSTANDING - Basic and Diluted		(0.0321	)		(0.1103	)		(0.0311	)

See accompanying notes to ~~the~~ consolidated financial statements.

F-4

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND ~~SUBSIDIARY~~SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’' EQUITY (DEFICIT)

FOR THE ~~PERIOD~~YEAR ~~FROM~~ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~DECEMBER 1431, ~~2012~~2013, ~~(INCEPTION)~~FOR TOTHE ~~DECEMBER~~SIX ~~31,~~MONTHS ~~2012~~ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 AND FOR THE YEAR ENDED ~~DECEMBER~~JUNE 3130, ~~2013 AND~~2015

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014

	Preferred Stock				Common Stock				Additional						Total
	$0.001 Par Value				$0.001 Par Value				Paid-in			Accumulated			Stockholders'
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Capital			Deficit			Equity (Deficit)

Balance at December 31, 2012		-		-		15,000,000		15,000		(14,999	)		(201,174	)		(201,173	)

Stockholder's capital contribution						-		-		1,201,261			-			1,201,261

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2013		-		-		-		-		-			(842,356	)		(842,356	)

Balance at December 31, 2013		-	$	-		15,000,000	$	15,000	$	1,186,262		$	(1,043,530	)	$	157,732

Recapitalization of the Company		-		-		2,505,014		2,505		(2,505	)		-			-

Principal stockholder's capital contribution		-		-		-		-		165,903			-			165,903

Issuance of common stock for cash and services		-		-		1,500,000		1,500		48,500			-			50,000

Net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2014		-		-		-		-		-			(555,302	)		(555,302	)

Balance at June 30, 2014		-		-		19,005,014		19,005		1,398,160			(1,598,832	)		(181,667	)

Issuance of common stock for cash		-		-		584,734		585		291,782			-			292,367

Issuance of common stock for services		-		-		20,100		20		10,030			-			10,050

Issuance of common stock for cash and services		-		-		100,000		100		84,900			-			85,000

Issuance of common stock in connection with asset purchase agreement		-		-		775,000		775		766,475			-			767,250

Vesting of stock options to employees and consultants		-		-		-		-		2,037,853			-			2,037,853

Net loss for the year ended June 30, 2015		-		-		-		-		-			(4,132,834	)		(4,132,834	)

Balance at June 30, 2015		-	$	-		20,484,848	$	20,485	$	4,589,200		$	(5,731,666	)	$	(1,121,981	)

	Preferred Stock				Common Stock				Additional						Total
	$0.001 Par Value				$0.001 Par Value				Paid-in			Accumulated			Stockholders’
	Shares		Amount		Shares		Amount		Capital			Deficit			Equity (Deficit)
Balance at February 14, 2012 (Inception)		—	$	—		—	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	—
Issuance of common stock to parent company		—		—		15,000,000		15,000		(14,999	)		—			1
Net loss for the period		—		—		—		—		—			(201,174	)		(201,174	)
Balance at December 31, 2012		—		—		15,000,000		15,000		(14,999	)		(201,174	)		(201,173	)
Stockholder’s capital contribution						—		—		1,201,261			—			1,201,261
Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2013		—		—		—		—		—			(842,356	)		(842,356	)
Balance at December 31, 2013		—	$	—		15,000,000	$	15,000	$	1,186,262		$	(1,043,530	)	$	157,732
Recapitalization of the Company		—		—		2,505,014		2,505		(2,505	)		—			—
Principal stockholder’s capital contribution		—		—		—		—		165,903			—			165,903
Issuance of common stock for cash and services		—		—		1,500,000		1,500		48,500			—			50,000
Net loss for the period		—		—		—		—		—			(555,302	)		(555,302	)
Balance at June 30, 2014		—	$	—		19,005,014	$	19,005	$	1,398,160		$	(1,598,832	)	$	(181,667	)

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements.

F-5

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. AND ~~SUBSIDIARY~~SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

							FOR THE PERIOD FROM
	FOR THE YEAR			FOR THE SIX MONTHS			FOR THE YEAR
	FOR THE SIX MONTHS			FOR THE YEAR			FEBRUARY 14, 2012
	ENDED JUNE 30, 2015			ENDED JUNE 30, 2014			ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013
	ENDED			ENDED			(INCEPTION) TO
	JUNE 30, 2014			DECEMBER 31, 2013			DECEMBER 31, 2012
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(~~555~~4,~~302~~132,834	)	$	(~~842~~555,~~356~~302	)	$	(~~201~~842,~~174~~356	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation		4,787			7,985			1,329
Amortization and depreciation		120,431			4,787			7,985
Stock based compensation		48,500			—			—
Bad debts		9,609			-			-
Stock based compensation		2,132,803			48,500			-
Loss on impairment of intangible asset		657,693			-			-
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
Inventory		21,270			(45,519	)		(87,370	)
Accounts receivable		(63,826	)		-			-
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		(19,860	)		(3,409	)		(6,619	)
Inventory		68,899			21,270			(45,519	)
Deposit		(3,500	)		—			—
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		13,189			(19,860	)		(3,409	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		79,588			33,302			—
Deposit		-			(3,500	)		-
Net cash used in operating activities		(424,517	)		(849,997	)		(293,834	)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		377,411			79,588			33,302
Net cash used in operating activities		(816,625	)		(424,517	)		(849,997	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capitalized cost of trademark		—			—			(1,601	)
Purchase of property and equipment		(46,329	)		(22,918	)		(23,567	)
Purchase of property and equipment		(22,918	)		(23,567	)		(17,257	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(46,329	)		(22,918	)		(23,567	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(22,918	)		(23,567	)		(18,858	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from notes payable		~~289~~413,~~911~~539			—289,911			—-
Proceeds from related party equity contributions		165,903			872,476			328,785
Proceeds from loan payable		50,000			-			-
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		1,500			—			1
Proceeds from related party advances		95,500			-			-
Net cash provided by financing activities		457,314			872,476			328,786
Payments made for related party advances		(3,000	)		-			-
Net (decrease) increase in cash		9,879			(1,088	)		16,094
Proceeds from related party equity contributions		-			165,903			872,476
Cash at beginning of period		15,006			16,094			—
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		292,467			1,500			-
Cash at end of period	$	24,885		$	15,006		$	16,094
Net cash provided by financing activities		848,506			457,314			872,476
Net (decrease) increase in cash		(14,448	)		9,879			(1,088	)
Cash at beginning of period		24,885			15,006			16,094
Cash at end of period	$	10,437		$	24,885		$	15,006
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid for:
Interest	$	—-		$	—-		$	—-
Income taxes	$	—-		$	—-		$	—-
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Contributed capital in connection with the forgiveness of related party advances	$	~~165,903~~-		$	1165,~~201,261~~903		$	—1,201,261
Issued a note payable to settle accounts payable	$	20,000		$	-		$	-
Issuance of common stock in connection with asset purchase agreement	$	767,250		$	-		$	-
Acquisition of inventory in connection with asset purchase agreement	$	8,373		$	-		$	-

See accompanying notes to ~~the~~ consolidated financial statements.

F-6

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND ~~SUBSIDIARY~~SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ~~JUNE 30, 2014~~

JUNE 30, 2015

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Organization

Nature of Business

America Greener Technologies, Inc.’s (formerly Osler Incorporated) (the “Company”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada on July 30, 2004. The Company’s principal business is focused on marketing and selling Polarchem’s proprietary technology solutions in North America. The Company has a license agreement with Polarchem~~, a~~ ~~related party,~~ to sell Polarchem’s products (see Note 68). The Company’s primary product is AGT Polarchem chemistry that allows online cleaning of boiler tube and heat transfer surfaces to provide boiler optimization and combustion efficiency to a wide variety of customers including coal fired power plants, petroleum refineries, waste to energy facilities, biomass combustion processes, incinerators, fuel oil burners, naval vessels and other similar combustion processes. AGT Subsidiary (as hereinafter defined) was a former subsidiary of America Greener Technologies Corporation, a British Columbia company (“AGT Canada”).

On October 31, 2014 AGT Soft Wave, Inc. (“AGT Soft Wave”), a newly formed Nevada corporation that is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, acquired certain assets from Soft Wave Innovations, Inc., an Arizona corporation (“Soft Wave”), in exchange for 775,000 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $767,250 or $0.99 per share under the terms of an asset purchase agreement (the “Asset Purchase Agreement”) by and among the Company, AGT Soft Wave and Soft Wave. The assets that were acquired included customer contracts, trade names, inventory, tools and parts, and demonstration contracts related to the prior joint venture with Soft Wave. As of June 30, 2015, the Company’s management determined that these assets were fully impaired and recorded an impairment loss equal to the aggregate carrying value of these assets. AGT Soft Wave’s principal business is focused on the development, manufacturing, marketing and servicing of certain water treatment technology related to an apparatus for generating a multi-vibrational field in worldwide residential, commercial and industrial markets including energy and power generation, petroleum and petrochemical, mining and mineral processing. The Company uses a certain patented technology that reduces and eliminates chemical water treatment which also helps reduce maintenance cost and conserve water.

Recapitalization

On February 25, 2014, America Greener Technologies Corporation, a private Arizona corporation (“"AGT Subsidiary”"), which is the historical business, entered into a Share Exchange Agreement with the Company (formerly Osler Incorporated) and the shareholders of AGT Subsidiary whereby the Company agreed to acquire all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of AGT Subsidiary in exchange for 15,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. On March 19, 2014 the transaction closed and AGT Subsidiary is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Prior to the acquisition of AGT Subsidiary, the Company was a shell company.

At closing, the Company issued 15,000,000 shares of its common stock to the shareholders of AGT Subsidiary who obtained approximately 86% voting control and management control of the Company. The transaction was accounted for as a reverse acquisition and recapitalization of AGT Subsidiary whereby AGT Subsidiary is considered the acquirer for accounting purposes. The consolidated financial statements after the acquisition include the balance sheets of both companies at historical cost, the historical results of AGT Subsidiary and the results of the Company from the acquisition date. All share and per share information in the accompanying consolidated financial statements and footnotes has been retroactively restated to reflect the recapitalization (see Note 57).

On February 25, 2014, AGT Subsidiary changed its fiscal year end to June 30 from December 31. Accordingly these consolidated financial statements reflect the year ended June 30, 2015, the transition period of the six months ended June 30, 2014, and the year ended December 31, 2013, and the ~~period from February 14, 2012 (Inception) to December 31, 2012 and the~~ Company’s financial condition at June 30, 2015, June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013 ~~and 2012~~ which iswas the end of the prior fiscal year previously reported.

Basis of presentation and going concern

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“US GAAP”) and present the consolidated financial statements of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiary. In the preparation of consolidated financial statements of the Company, all intercompany transactions and balances were eliminated. As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has incurred net losses of $555,302, $842,356 and $201,174 for the six months ended June 30, 2014, for the year ended December 31, 2013 and for the period from February 14, 2012 (Inception) to December 31, 2012, respectively and the Company had cash used in operations of $424,517, $849,997 and $293,834 for the six months ended June 30, 2014, for the year ended December 31, 2013 and for the period from February 14, 2012 (Inception) to December 31, 2012. Additionally the Company has an accumulated deficit of $1,598,832 at June 30, 2014. The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company generating profitable operations in the future and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. The Company’s ability to raise additional capital through future issuances of common stock is unknown. The obtainment of additional financing, the successful development of the Company’s contemplated plan of operations, and its transition, ultimately, to the attainment of profitable operations are necessary for the Company to continue operations. Uncertainty regarding these matters raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to generate revenues, there can be no assurances to that effect.

F-7

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND ~~SUBSIDIARY~~SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ~~JUNE 30, 2014~~

JUNE 30, 2015

Basis of presentation and going concern

The consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America ("US GAAP") and present the consolidated financial statements of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have eliminated. As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has incurred net losses of $4,132,834, $555,302, and $842,356 for the year ended June 30, 2015, for the six months ended June 30, 2014, and for the year ended December 31, 2013, respectively and the Company had cash used in operations of $816,625, $424,517, and $849,997 for the year ended June 30, 2015, for the six months ended June 30, 2014, and for the year ended December 31, 2013. Additionally the Company has an accumulated deficit of approximately $5.7 million at June 30, 2015. The ability to continue as a going concern is dependent upon the Company generating profitable operations in the future and/or to obtain the necessary financing to meet its obligations and repay its liabilities arising from normal business operations when they come due. The Company’s ability to raise additional capital through future issuances of common stock is unknown. The obtainment of additional financing, the successful development of the Company’s contemplated plan of operations, and its transition, ultimately, to the attainment of profitable operations are necessary for the Company to continue operations.

F-8

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2015

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Uncertainty regarding these matters raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. While the Company believes in the viability of its strategy to generate revenues, there can be no assurances to that effect.

Use of estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the ~~U.S.~~United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and the related disclosures at the date of the financial statements and during the reporting period. Actual results could materially differ from these estimates. Significant estimates include the valuation of deferred tax assets, intangible assets, stock based compensation and the useful ~~life~~lives of property and equipment.

Cash and cash equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments and other short-term investments with maturities of three months or less, when purchased, to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains cash and cash equivalent balances at one financial institution that is insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. The Company’s ~~account~~accounts at this institution isare insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to $250,000. As of June 30, ~~2014~~2015, the Company has not reached bank balances exceeding the FDIC insurance limit. To reduce its risk associated with the failure of such financial institution, the Company evaluates at least annually the rating of the financial institution in which it holds deposits.

Accounts receivable and allowance for doubtful accounts

The Company has a policy of providing on allowance for doubtful accounts based on its best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in its existing accounts receivable. The Company periodically reviews its accounts receivable to determine whether an allowance is necessary based on an analysis of past due accounts and other factors that may indicate that the realization of an account may be in doubt. Account balances deemed to be uncollectible are charged to bad debt expense and included in the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. As of June 30, 2015, June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013, allowance for doubtful accounts amounted to $9,609, $0 and $0, respectively.

F-9

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2015

Inventory

Inventory, consisting of finished goods related to the Company’s products, are stated at the lower of cost or market utilizing the first-in, first-out method.

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

Prepaid expenses and other current assets of $16,699, $29,888, and $10,028 ~~and~~at $6June 30,~~619~~ at2015, June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013 ~~and 2012~~, respectively, consist primarily of costs paid for future services which will occur within a year. Prepaid expenses ~~include~~included prepayments in cash for ~~prepaid~~ consulting fees and ~~prepaid~~ insurance, which are being amortized over the terms of their respective agreements.

Fair value measurements and fair value of financial instruments

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. The Company classifies assets and liabilities recorded at fair value under the fair value hierarchy based upon the observability of inputs used in valuation techniques. Observable inputs (highest level) reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs (lowest level) reflect internally developed market assumptions. The fair value measurements are classified under the following hierarchy:

·● Level 1—Observable inputs that reflect quoted market prices (unadjusted) for identical assets and liabilities in active markets; ·● Level 2—Observable inputs, other than quoted market prices, that are either directly or indirectly observable in the marketplace for identical or similar assets and liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets and liabilities; and ·● Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity that is significant to the fair value of assets or liabilities.

The estimated fair value of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, prepaid expenses and accounts payable are carried at historical cost basis, which approximates their fair values because of the shortF-~~term nature of these instruments.~~10

~~F-8~~AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~AMERICA GREENER~~NOTES ~~TECHNOLOGIES~~TO ~~INC.~~CONSOLIDATED ~~AND~~FINANCIAL ~~SUBSIDIARY~~STATEMENTS

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS~~ JUNE 30, ~~2014~~2015

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

The estimated fair values of certain financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, prepaid expenses, accounts payable and notes and loans payable approximates their carrying values because of the short-term nature of these instruments and for the use of implicit interest rates.

Property and equipment

Property and equipment are carried at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The cost of repairs and maintenance is expensed as incurred; major replacements and improvements are capitalized. When assets are retired or disposed of, the cost and accumulated depreciation are removed, and any resulting gains or losses are included in the consolidated statement of operations.

~~Trademark~~F-11

~~Legal~~AMERICA ~~costs associated~~GREENER ~~with~~TECHNOLOGIES ~~serving and protecting trademark are being capitalized~~INC. ~~During~~AND the period from February 14, 2012 (inception) to December 31, 2012, the Company filed a trademark for its company logo. In accordance with Accounting Standards related to “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, the Company does not amortize its trademark determined to have an indefinite useful life. Instead, the Company assesses its indefinite-life trademark for impairment annually and when circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.SUBSIDIARIES

~~Impairment of~~NOTES ~~long-lived~~TO ~~assets~~CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

~~The~~JUNE Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable, or at least annually. The Company recognizes an impairment loss when the sum of expected undiscounted future cash flows is less than the carrying amount of the asset. The amount of impairment is measured as the difference between the asset’s estimated fair value and its book value. The Company did not consider it necessary to record any impairment charges during the six months ended June 30, ~~2014, the year ended December 31, 2013 and the period from February 14, 2012 (Inception) to December 31, 2012.~~2015

Intangible assets

Legal costs associated with serving and protecting trademarks are capitalized. During the period from February 14, 2012 (inception) to December 31, 2012, the Company filed a trademark for its company logo. In accordance with ASC 350-30-35 “Intangibles, Goodwill and Other”, the Company does not amortize its trademark, which is determined to have an indefinite useful life. Instead, the Company assesses its other trademark for impairment annually and when circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable.

Other intangible assets include customer and demonstration contracts and tradenames purchased and recorded based on the cost to acquire them. These assets are amortized over 5 years. Useful lives of intangible assets are periodically evaluated for reasonableness and the assets are tested for impairment annually and whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts may no longer be recoverable.

Factors the Company considers to be important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:

	1.	Significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results;
	2.	Significant changes in the manner of use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the overall business; and
	3.	Significant negative industry or economic trends.

When the Company determines that the carrying value of intangibles may not be recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above indicators of impairment and the carrying value of the asset cannot be recovered from projected undiscounted cash flows, the Company records an impairment charge. The Company measures any impairment based on a projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate determined by management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in the current business model. Significant management judgment is required in determining whether an indicator of impairment exists and in projecting cash flows. The amount of impairment is measured as the difference between the asset’s estimated fair value and its book value. The Company recorded impairment charges during the year ended June 30, 2015, the six months ended June 30, 2014, and the year ended December 31, 2013 of $657,693, $0 and $0, respectively.

Revenue recognition

The Company follows the guidance of the FASB ASC 605-10-S99 “Revenue Recognition Overall – SEC Materials”. The Company records revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, product delivery has occurred, the sales price to the customer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured.

The following policies reflect specific criteria for the various revenues streams of the Company:

Revenue from periodic maintenance service agreements is generally recognized ratably over the respective maintenance periods, provided no significant obligations remain and collectability of the related receivable is probable.

Revenue from the sale of the Company’s Polarchem’s solution and products are recognized upon delivery to the customers.

Revenue for equipment installation and cleaning services is recognized upon completion of the installation and cleaning services. Approximately 98% of the Company’s revenues for the year ended June 30, 2015 and 100% of the Company’s revenues for the six months ended June 30, 2014 ~~was~~were generated from these revenue stream. The Company did not generate any revenues during the year ended December 31, 2013 ~~and for the period from February 14, 2012 (Inception) to December 31, 2012.~~

Revenue for services performed such as consulting and optimization services are recognized when services have been rendered.

F-12

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2015

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Cost of Sales

The primary components of cost of sales include the cost of the product, shipping/delivery costs, and installation/labor cost.

Concentration of Revenue and Supplier

~~Revenues from~~The aCompany ~~customer~~purchases ~~accounted~~substantially ~~for~~all ~~approximately~~of ~~100%~~its ofproducts ~~the~~from ~~Company’s~~Polarchem ~~revenues~~which ~~for~~has manufacturing companies located in India and the ~~six~~UK ~~months~~(see ~~ended~~Note ~~June~~6 ~~30,~~and ~~2014~~8).

~~The~~During the year ended June 31, 2015, sales to two customers (59% and 10%) represented approximately 69% of the Company ~~purchases~~’s ~~substantially~~net ~~all~~sales. During the six months ended June 30, 2014, sales to one customer represented 100% of ~~its~~the ~~products~~Company’s ~~from~~net ~~Polarchem~~sales. ~~which~~There ~~has~~were ~~manufacturing~~no ~~companies~~sales ~~located~~during inthe ~~India~~year ~~and~~ended December 31, 2013. As of June 30, 2015, the UKCompany had four customers (~~see Note~~25%, 412%, 20%, and 611%) representing approximately 68% of gross accounts receivable. As of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, accounts receivable for both periods was $0.

F-9

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2014

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Income taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes pursuant to the ~~provision~~provisions of ASC 740-10, “~~Accounting for~~ Income Taxes” which requires, among other things, an asset and liability approach to calculating deferred income taxes. The asset and liability approach requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. A valuation allowance is provided to offset any net deferred tax assets for which management believes it is more likely than not that the net deferred asset will not be realized.

The Company also follows the ~~provision~~provisions of ~~the~~ ASC 740-10 related to ~~Accounting~~accounting for ~~Uncertain~~uncertain ~~Income~~income ~~Tax~~tax ~~Position~~position. When tax returns are filed, some positions taken may be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others may be subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. In accordance with the guidance of ASC 740-10, the benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. As of June 30, 2015, June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013, the Company has had no uncertain tax positions. The Company recognizes interest and penalties, if any, related to uncertain tax positions as general and administrative expenses. The Company currently has ~~filed~~no federal or state tax examinations nor has it had any federal or state examinations since its ~~2013~~inception. The ~~income~~Company's 2015, 2014, and 2013 tax ~~return~~years ~~which~~may ~~remains~~still be subject to ~~IRS~~federal and state tax examination.

F-13

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2015

Stock-based compensation

Stock-based compensation is accounted for based on the requirements of ~~the~~ASC ~~Share-Based~~718, ~~Payment~~“Compensation ~~Topic~~– ofStock ~~ASC~~Compensation”, ~~718~~ which requires recognition in the consolidated financial statements of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments over the period the employee or director is required to perform the services in exchange for the award (presumptively, the vesting period). The ASC also requires measurement of the cost of employee and director services received in exchange for an award based on the grant-date fair value of the award. The Company recognizes compensation on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each award. There were 3,000,000 options outstanding as of June 30, 2015 and no options outstanding as of June 30, 2014, and December 31, ~~2013~~ ~~and 2012~~2013. The Company accounts for non-employee stock-based awards in accordance with the measurement and recognition criteria under ASC Topic 505-50, “Equity – Based Payments to Non-Employees”.

Pursuant to ASC Topic 505-50, for share-based payments to consultants and other third-parties, compensation expense is determined at the “ measurement date.” Measurement date is the date at which the equity share price and other pertinent factors, such as expected volatility, that enters into measurement of the total recognized amount of compensation cost for an award of share-based payments are fixed. The expense is recognized over the vesting period of the award. Until the measurement date is reached, the total amount of compensation expense remains uncertain. The Company initially records compensation expense based on the fair value of the award at the reporting date.

Marketing, selling and advertising

Marketing, selling and advertising costs are expensed as incurred. For the ~~six~~year ~~months~~ ended June 30, ~~2014~~2015, for the ~~year~~six months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2013~~ 2014, and for the ~~period~~year ~~from~~ended ~~February 14, 2012 (Inception) to~~ December 31, ~~2012~~2013, such expenses were $4135,~~200~~129, $~~116~~4,~~545~~200, and $12116,~~945~~545, respectively.

F-14

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2015

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)

Net loss per share of common stock

Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss by the weighted average number of common shares during the period. Diluted net loss per share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period. At June 30, 2015, June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013 ~~and 2012~~, the Company has had 3,250,000, 0250,000 and 0 potentially dilutive securities outstanding, respectively, in connection with the convertible notes (see Note 35) and stock options (see Note 7) which were excluded from the diluted net loss per share computation as their effect would be anti-dilutive.

Recent accounting pronouncements

Accounting standards which were not effective until after June 30, ~~2014~~2015 are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

F-10

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2014

NOTE 2 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment consisted of the following:

	Estimated life	~~Estimated life~~	June 30, 2015	~~June 30, 2014~~			June 30, 2014	~~December 31, 2013~~			December 31, 2013	~~December 31, 2012~~
Demonstration equipment	5 years	~~5 years~~		51,494	~~51,494~~			51,494	~~35,266~~			35,266	~~12,600~~
Furniture and fixtures	5 years	~~5 years~~		7,747	~~7,747~~			7,747	~~4,657~~			4,657	~~4,657~~
Computer equipment	3 years	~~3 years~~		11,805	~~3,600~~			3,600	—			-	—
Warehouse equipment		3 years			900				900				—
Water treatment equipment	3 years			33,624				-				-
Less: Accumulated depreciation					(14,100	)			(9,313	)			(1,329	)
Warehouse equipment	3 years			900				900				900
				$	49,641			$	31,510			$	15,928
Vehicle	5 years			4,500				-				-
Less: Accumulated depreciation				(33,347	)			(14,100	)			(9,313	)
			$	76,723			$	49,641			$	31,510

For the ~~six months~~year ended June 30, ~~2014~~2015, for the ~~year~~six months ended ~~December~~June 3130, ~~2013~~2014, and for the ~~period~~year ~~from~~ended ~~February 14, 2012 (Inception) to~~ December 31, ~~2012~~2013, depreciation expense amounted to $419,~~787~~247, $74,~~985~~787, and $17,~~329,~~985 respectively.

~~NOTE 3 – NOTES PAYABLE~~F-15

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2015

NOTE 3 – BUSINESS ACQUISITION

On October 31, 2014 AGT Soft Wave, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, acquired certain assets, constituting a business, from Soft Wave Innovations Inc., a third party, in exchange for 775,000 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $767,250 or $0.99 per share under the terms of the Asset Purchase Agreement by and among the Company, AGT Soft Wave and Soft Wave. The purpose of the acquisition was to acquire certain targeted customer relationships, demonstration contracts and trade names of Soft Wave which would generate incremental revenues to the Company while making additional use of the Company's area of expertise. The fair value of the shares of the common stock were based on the quoted trading price on the closing date of the transaction (see Note 7). The assets that were acquired included customer contracts, trade names, inventory, tools and parts, and demonstration contracts related to the prior joint venture with Soft Wave. The Company accounted for the acquisition utilizing the purchase method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805 “Business Combinations”. Accordingly, the Company applied push–down accounting and adjusted to fair value all of the assets acquired directly on the financial statements of the subsidiary, AGT Soft Wave.

The purchase price paid by the Company had been allocated to assets acquired on the records of the Company as follows:

Inventory	$	8,373
Customer and demonstration contracts and trade names – intangible assets		758,877
Purchase price	$	767,250

F-16

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2015

NOTE 3 – ACQUISITION OF ASSETS (continued)

The following table summarizes the unaudited pro forma consolidated results of operations as if the Company’s acquisition of assets of Soft Wave had occurred on January 1, 2013:

	For the year ended June 30, 2015						For the six months ended June 30, 2014						For the year ended December 31, 2013
	As Reported			Pro Forma			As Reported			Pro Forma			As Reported			Pro Forma
Net Revenues	$	770,265		$	910,400		$	114,619		$	338,647		$	-		$	490,367
Loss from operations		(4,113,245	)		(4,170,272	)		(553,080	)		(602,457	)		(842,356	)		(852,536	)
Net Loss		(4,132,834	)		(4,189,678	)		(555,302	)		(604,678	)		(842,356	)		(852,536	)
Net Loss per common share:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.21	)		(0.21	)	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.11	)

The unaudited pro forma consolidated income statements are for informational purposes only and should not be considered indicative of actual results that would have been achieved if the Company and acquisition of assets of Soft Wave had been completed at the beginning of fiscal year 2013, or results that may be obtained in any future period.

NOTE 4 – INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets include trademarks and purchased customer and demonstration contracts and trade names which are recorded based on their acquisition cost and consisted of the following:

	June 30, 2015

Customer and demonstration contracts and trade names	$	758,877
Trademark		1,601
Accumulated amortization		(101,184)
Intangible assets, net		659,294
Less: impairment loss (see Note 1)		(657,693)
Intangible assets, net	$	1,601

Amortization of customer, demonstration contracts and tradenames is included in operating expenses as reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations. The trademarks is not amortized due to its indefinite life.

Amortization expense for the year ended June 2015, for the six months ended June 30, 2014, and the year ended December 31, 2013 was $101,184, $0, and $0, respectively. During the year June 30, 2015, the Company reviewed its intangible assets for impairment and has determined that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. The Company recognized an impairment loss of $657,693 on its customer, demonstration contracts and tradenames.

F-17

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2015

NOTE 5 – LOANS AND NOTES PAYABLE

Loan payable

In March 2015, an unrelated party loaned a total of $50,000 to the Company. This loan is non-interest bearing and is due on demand. The proceeds were used for working capital purposes. As of June 30, 2015, loan payable amounted to $50,000.

F-18

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2015

NOTE 5 – LOANS AND NOTES PAYABLE (continued)

Convertible notes payable – related party

In March 2014 prior to the recapitalization, AGT Subsidiary issued 3% convertible promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $100,000 to two affiliates of AGT Subsidiary in payment of advances made in January 2014 and February 2014. Additionally, the note holders are majority stockholders of the Company (see Notes 6). These notes were to mature on June 30, 2014 but ~~have~~were ~~been~~ extended to December 31, 2014, and are convertible at any time at either the option of the holder or AGT Subsidiary into shares of AGT Subsidiary’s common stock at a conversion price of $0.40 per share. Following the closing of the recapitalization on March 19, 2014, by the terms of the notes these are now convertible into shares of the Company’s common stock at $0.40 per share. At June 30, ~~2014~~2015, the Company had $~~875~~3,917 in accrued interest on the notes. AtOn ~~June~~December 30, 2014, the ~~principal~~maturity ~~amounts~~date ofhas ~~these~~been ~~notes~~extended ~~amounted~~ to ~~$100,000. The~~July ~~Company~~2015 ~~has~~(see ~~determined~~Note ~~that~~8). ~~there~~These ~~was no beneficial conversion feature associated with these~~ notes asare ~~the~~expected ~~conversion~~to ~~price of~~be ~~the~~renewed ~~notes~~by ~~was higher than~~ the ~~fair value of the Company’s common stock based on a sales transaction that occurred in March 2014 (see Note 6)~~holders.

At June 30, 2015, the principal amounts of these convertible notes amounted to $100,000. The Company has determined that there was no beneficial conversion feature associated with these notes as the conversion price of the notes was higher than the fair value of the Company’s common stock based on a sales transaction that occurred in March 2014.

Promissory notes (including related party)

Between April 2014 and ~~June~~September 2014, the Company issued 3% promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $~~189~~623,~~911~~450. One of the note holders is a principal stockholder of the Company. These notes ~~mature~~matured on July 1, 2015 and may be prepaid in whole or in part without any penalty. These notes were used for working capital purposes. AtThese ~~June~~promissory ~~30,~~notes ~~2014,~~matured on July 1st 2015 and are expected to be renewed by the ~~Company~~holders ~~had~~or ~~$711~~will inbe ~~accrued~~converted ~~interest~~to ~~on these~~common ~~promissory~~shares ~~notes~~at a yet to be announced price.

At June 30, 2015, the Company had $15,050 in accrued interest on these promissory notes.

Notes payable consisted of the following:

Notes payable – unrelated party	$	144,960
	June 30, 2015		June 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
Note payable – related party		44,951
Notes payable – unrelated party	$	400,091	$	144,960	$	-
Total notes payable	$	189,911
Notes payable – related party (see Note 6)		223,359		44,951		-
Total notes payable	$	623,450	$	189,911	$	-

~~There~~NOTE ~~were~~6 no– ~~notes~~RELATED ~~payable~~PARTY ~~in fiscal year 2013 and 2012.~~TRANSACTIONS

F-11

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2014

NOTE 4 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Parties are considered to be related to the Company if the parties directly or indirectly, through one or more intermediaries, control, are controlled by, or are under common control with the Company. Related parties also include principal owners of the Company, its management, members of the immediate families of principal owners of the Company and its management and other parties with which the Company may deal where one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the transacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests. The Company discloses all related party transactions. All transactions shall be recorded at fair value of the goods or services exchanged. Property purchased from a related party is recorded at the cost to the related party and any payment to or on behalf of the related party in excess of the cost is reflected as compensation or distribution to related parties depending on the transaction.

From time to time, since inception, the Company’s parent company, AGT Canada, provided advances to the Company for working capital purposes. For the period from February 14, 2012 (inception) to December 31, 2012, AGT Canada provided advances amounting to $328,785. At December 31, 2012, the Company had a payable to AGT Canada of $328,785. The advances were due on demand and interest free. For the period from February 14, 2012 (inception) to June 30, 2014, AGT Canada provided advances aggregating to $1,367,164. The advances were due on demand and interest free. During the year ended December 31, 2013 and the six months ended June 30, 2014, AGT Canada waived the payment of such advances of $1,201,261 and $165,903, respectively, and accordingly reclassified these to additional paid in capital as stockholder’s capital contribution, leaving a balance of advances of $0 at June 30, 2015, June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013.

Through the Company’s former parent, AGT Canada, the Company entered into a general agreement and contract dated in November 2011 with Polarchem. The owners of Polarchem are shareholders of AGT Canada. In February 2014, AGT Subsidiary entered into a 30 year license agreement with Polarchem which superseded the Original Agreement with AGT Canada (see Note 6). There were no purchased inventories and products from Polarchem during the year ended June 30, 2015 and the six months ended June 30, 2014. The Company purchased inventories and products from Polarchem totaling approximately $64,000 ~~and $87,000~~ during the year ended December 31, 2013 ~~and for the period from February 14, 2012 (inception) to December 31, 2012~~.

In January 2013, the Company entered into three independent contractor agreements with Mr. Michael Boyko, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Energistics Consulting, LLC, a company owned by the Company’s Chief Operating Officer, and Mr. James Mack (see Note 6).F-19

InAMERICA ~~January 2014,~~GREENER ~~the~~TECHNOLOGIES ~~Company’s COO provided advances to AGT Subsidiary for working capital purposes for $5,000~~INC. ~~The~~AND advance was due on demand and interest free. This advance was paid by the end of January 2014. In May 2014, the Company’s COO provided additional advances to the Company for working capital purposes for $10,000. The 2nd advance was due on demand and bore 3% interest. The 2nd advance was paid on May 16, 2014 in the amount of $10,300 which included interest of $300.SUBSIDIARIES

InNOTES ~~March~~TO ~~2014, AGT~~CONSOLIDATED ~~Subsidiary~~FINANCIAL issued 3% convertible promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $100,000 to two affiliates of AGT Subsidiary in payment of advances made in January 2014 and February 2014. Additionally, one of the note holders is a principal stockholder of the Company (see Note 3).STATEMENTS

InJUNE ~~April 2014~~30, ~~the Company issued a 3% promissory note in the principal amount of $44,951 to a principal stockholder of the Company (see Note 3).~~2015

NOTE 56 – ~~STOCKHOLDERS’~~ ~~EQUITY~~RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (~~DEFICIT~~continued)

OnIn ~~February 14,~~January ~~2012~~2013, the Company ~~issued~~entered ~~15,000,000~~into ~~shares~~three ofindependent contractor agreements with Mr. Michael Boyko, the Company’s ~~common~~former ~~stock~~Chief toExecutive Officer, Energistics Consulting, LLC, a company owned by Mr. Rick Barbosa, the Company’s former ~~parent,~~Chief ~~AGT~~Operating ~~Canada~~Officer, ~~for~~ aand ~~purchase~~Mr. ~~price~~James ofMack $1(see Note 8).

In January 2014, the Company’s former COO provided advances to AGT Subsidiary for working capital purposes for $5,000. The advance was due on demand and interest free. This advance was paid by the end of January 2014. In May 2014, the Company’s former COO provided additional advances to the Company for working capital purposes for $10,000. The 2nd advance was due on demand and bore 3% interest. The 2nd advance was paid on May 16, 2014 in the amount of $10,300 which included interest of $300.

In March 2014, AGT Subsidiary issued 3% convertible promissory notes in the aggregate principal amount of $100,000 to two affiliates of AGT Subsidiary in payment of advances made in January 2014 and February 2014. Additionally, one of the note holders is a principal stockholder of the Company (see Note 5).

Between April 2014 and September 2014, the Company issued a 3% promissory note in the principal amount of $223,359 to a principal stockholder of the Company (see Note 5).

Between September 2014 and March 2015, the Company’s former COO provided advances to AGT Subsidiary for working capital purposes for $18,000. The advance was due on demand and interest free. The Company paid back $3,000 in November 2014 leaving a balance of $15,000 as of June 30, 2015.

Between November 2014 and March 2015, the Company’s former CFO, Ms. Borgen, provided advances to the subsidiaries of the Company for working capital purposes for $75,000. The advance was due on demand and interest free. As of June 30, 2015, advances owed to the former CFO amounted to $75,000.

In March 2015, the Company’s former CEO provided advances to the subsidiaries of the Company for $2,500 for working capital purposes. The advance was due on demand and interest free. As of June 30, 2015, advances owed to the former CEO amounted to $2,500.

On September 2, 2015, Mr. Boyko, Mr. Barbosa and Ms. Borgen resigned their positions as executive officers of the Company. On September 8, 2015, Mr. John Mooney was appointed the Chief Executive Officer, President and Secretary of the Company. As a result, Mr. Mooney is currently the Company’s sole director and sole officer.

F-20

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2015

NOTE 7 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

Common stock

On February 25, 2014 AGT Subsidiary entered into a Share Exchange Agreement with the Company and the shareholders of AGT Subsidiary whereby the Company agreed to acquire all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of AGT Subsidiary in exchange for 15,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. On March 19, 2014 the transaction closed and AGT Subsidiary is now a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. This transaction was accounted for as a reverse recapitalization of AGT Subsidiary since the shareholders of AGT Subsidiary obtained approximately 86% voting control and management control of the Company, AGT Subsidiary is considered the acquirer for accounting purposes. The Company is deemed to have issued 2,505,014 shares of common stock which represents the outstanding common shares of the Company just prior to the closing of the transaction.

F-12

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2014

NOTE 5 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT) (continued)

On March 19, 2014, the Company’s board of directors authorized its 2014 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2014 Plan”) covering 3,000,000 shares of common stock. The 2014 Plan also contains an “evergreen formula” pursuant to which the number of shares of common stock available for issuance under the 2014 Plan will automatically increase on the first trading day of January each calendar year during the term of the 2014 Plan, beginning with calendar year 2015, by an amount equal to 1% of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding on the last trading day in December of the immediately preceding calendar year, up to a maximum annual increase of 200,000 shares of common stock. The purpose of the 2014 Plan is to enable the Company to offer to the Company’s employees, officers, directors and consultants, whose past, present and/or potential contributions to the Company have been, are or will be important to the Company’s success, an opportunity to acquire a proprietary interest in the Company. The 2014 Plan is administered by the Company’s board of directors.

~~On March~~ F-21, 2014 the Company sold 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with a fair market value of $50,000 at a purchase price of $0.001 per share to two accredited investors pursuant to the term and conditions of a consulting agreement entered into in December 2013 by AGT Subsidiary. Stock based compensation of $48,500 has been recognized in the accompanying consolidated statements of operation (see Note 6).

~~NOTE~~AMERICA 6GREENER ~~– COMMITMENTS~~TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND ~~CONTINGENCIES~~SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2015

NOTE 7 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT (continued)

On March 21, 2014 the Company sold 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock with a fair market value of $50,000 at a purchase price of $0.001 per share to two accredited investors pursuant to the term and conditions of a consulting agreement entered into in December 2013 by AGT Subsidiary. Stock based compensation of $48,500 had been recognized in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations during the six months ended June 30, 2014 (see Note 8).

Between November 2014 and February 2015, the Company sold 584,734 shares of the Company’s common stock for cash and received net proceeds of $292,367 or $0.50 per share.

In November 2014, the Company issued 20,100 shares of its common stock at $0.50 per common share to a consultant as payment for accounting services rendered. The Company valued these common shares at the fair value of $0.50 per common share based on the sale of common stock in a private placement at $0.50 per common share. In connection with issuance of these common shares, the Company recorded stock-based professional fees of $10,050.

On May 11, 2015 the Board of Directors of the Company ratified the prior execution of a Consulting Agreement dated April 6, 2015 with Emmanuel Kouyoumdjian pursuant to which Mr. Kouyoumdjian was engaged to assist us with a variety of services including the introduction to financial relations companies and other financial services, stockholder relations, and introduction to FINRA member firms. The initial term of the agreement is six months and it may be renewed upon the mutual consent of the parties. As compensation for the initial term, the Company agreed to issue him 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for a cash payment of $100, valued at $85,000 or $0.85 per share, and agreed to pay him $2,500 per month and to reimburse him for his expenses. If the Company has not terminated the agreement after the initial six months, the Company agreed to issue him an additional 100,000 shares of the Company’s common stock for $100. In connection with issuance of these common shares, the Company recorded stock-based consulting fees of $84,900. The fair value of the shares of the common stock was based on the quoted trading price on the date of grant.

Stock options

On August 28, 2014, the Company granted an aggregate of 1,800,000 five year options to purchase shares of common stock under the Company’s 2014 Equity Compensation Plan to three officers of the Company, four employees of the Company and one consultant. The options vest immediately on the date of grant and are exercisable at $0.60 per share. The 1,800,000 options were valued on the grant date at approximately $0.71 per option or a total of $1,278,000 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $0.80 per share (based on the quoted trading prices on the date of grant), volatility of 135% (based from volatilities of similar companies), expected term of 5 years, and a risk free interest rate of 1.63%.

On October 1, 2014 Ms. Carrie Borgen was appointed Chief Financial Officer of the Company and was granted 300,000 five year options to purchase shares of common stock under the Company’s 2014 Equity Compensation Plan. The options vest immediately on the date of grant and are exercisable at $0.70 per share. The 300,000 options were valued on the grant date at approximately $0.61 per option or a total of $181,820 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $0.70 per share (based on the quoted trading price on the date of grant), volatility of 132% (based from volatilities of similar companies), expected term of 5 years, and a risk free interest rate of 1.69%.

On March 5, 2015 the Company granted 300,000 five year options to purchase shares of common stock under the Company’s 2014 Equity Compensation Plan to the Chief Technology Officer of the Company. The options vest immediately on the date of grant and are exercisable at $0.70 per share. The 300,000 options were valued on the grant date at approximately $0.61 per option or a total of $183,635 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $0.70 per share (based on the quoted trading price on the date of grant), volatility of 115% (based from volatilities of similar companies), expected term of 5 years, and a risk free interest rate of 1.66%.

F-22

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2015

NOTE 7 – STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT (continued)

On March 9, 2015 the Company granted a newly appointed board of director of the Company 300,000 five year options to purchase shares of common stock under the Company’s 2014 Equity Compensation Plan. The options vest immediately on the date of grant and are exercisable at $0.70 per share. The 300,000 options were valued on the grant date at approximately $0.61 per option or a total of $183,636 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $0.70 per share (based on the quoted trading price on the date of grant), volatility of 115% (based from volatilities of similar companies), expected term of 5 years, and a risk free interest rate of 1.66%.

On April 30, 2015 the Company granted an aggregate of 300,000 five year options to purchase shares of common stock under the Company’s 2014 Equity Compensation Plan to a newly appointed Board of Director of the Company. The options vest immediately on the date of grant and are exercisable at $0.70 per share. The 300,000 options were valued on the grant date at approximately $0.70 per option or a total of $210,762 using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $0.85 per share (based on the quoted trading price on the date of grant), volatility of 115% (based from volatilities of similar companies), expected term of 5 years, and a risk free interest rate of 1.39%.

In connection with the stock option granted in fiscal 2015, the Company recorded stock based compensation and consulting for the year ended June 30, 2015 of $2,037,853 which was included in compensation and consulting expense as reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of operations.

A summary of the stock options and changes during the period are presented below:

	Number of Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)
June 30, 2014		-		-		-
Granted		3,000,000		0.64		5.00
Exercised		-		-		-
Forfeited		-		-		-
Cancelled		-		-		-
Balance outstanding at June 30, 2015		3,000,000	$	0.64		4.35

Options exercisable at June 30, 2015		3,000,000	$	0.64
Options expected to vest		-

Weighted average fair value of options granted during the year ended June 30, 2015					$	0.68

Stock options outstanding at June 30, 2015 as disclosed in the above table have approximately $210,000 intrinsic value at the end of the period. There were no unrecognized option costs as all outstanding options were fully vested at June 30, 2015.

F-23

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2015

NOTE 8 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Consulting agreements

In January 2013, through the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, AGT Subsidiary entered into three independent contractor agreements with Mr. Michael Boyko, former Chief Executive Officer of AGT Subsidiary, Energistics Consulting, LLC, a company owned by the former Chief Operating Officer of AGT Subsidiary, Mr. Barbosa, and Mr. James Mack (see Note 6). As compensation for their services per the terms of their respective agreements, the Company pays fees to i) Mr. Boyko of $10,000 per month ii) Energistics Consulting, LLC of $8,000 per month and iii) Mr. Mack of $4,000 per month. Additionally, the Company pays reimbursement for out of pocket travel expenses. These agreements contain customary confidentiality provisions and may be terminated by either party upon 30 days notice. Upon the closing of the Share Exchange Agreement, Michael C. Boyko, Ricardo A. Barbosa and James Mack were appointed as the new board of directors and new officers of the Company. Following the closing, Mr. Boyko was also appointed as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company and Mr. Barbosa was appointed Chief Operating Officer and Secretary of the Company.

In December 2013, AGT Subsidiary entered into a consulting agreement with a consulting company to provide due diligence and advisory services in connection with merger, acquisition or other forms of business combination matters. The term of this agreement was for a period of the earlier of six months from the date of this agreement or until AGT Subsidiary consummated a business combination, whichever is earlier. AGT Subsidiary agreed to pay the consultant a fee of $100,000, payable in two installments of $ 50,000 each in January 2014 and February 2014. Additionally, if AGT Subsidiary consummates a business combination during the term of this agreement, the consultant was entitled to purchase a total of 1,500,000 shares of the common stock, or 7.88%, whichever is greater, of the combined entity at par value or $0.001 per share, whichever is less. On March 21, 2014 the Company sold 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $1,500 or $0.001 per share to such consultant. The Company accounted for such transaction under ASC 505F-50-30 “Equity-based payments to Non-employees” and accordingly recorded stock based compensation of $48,500 which is equal to the fair value of shares issued in excess of the purchase price of $1,500.24

~~Pursuant~~AMERICA ~~to ASB~~GREENER ~~505-50-30~~TECHNOLOGIES establishes that share-based payment transactions with nonemployees shall be measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurableINC. ~~The~~AND ~~Company has determined that the fair value of the consideration received is more reliably measurable.~~SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2015

NOTE 8 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (continued)

In September 2014, the terms of the consulting agreement with Mr. Boyko, the former Chief Executive Officer, were orally modified pursuant to which the compensation payable under the agreement was increased from $10,000 per month to $12,000 per month. In addition, in September 2014 the terms of a consulting agreement with Energistics Consulting LLC, a company owned by Mr. Rick Barbosa, a former executive officer of the Company, were orally modified pursuant to which the compensation payable under the agreement was increased from $8,000 per month to $12,000 per month.

These agreements contain customary confidentiality provisions and may be terminated by either party upon 30 days notice. Upon the closing of the Share Exchange Agreement in March 2014, Michael C. Boyko, Ricardo A. Barbosa and James Mack were appointed as the board of directors and officers of the Company. Following the closing, Mr. Boyko was also appointed as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company and Mr. Barbosa was appointed Chief Operating Officer and Secretary of the Company. On September 2, 2015, Mr. Boyko, Mr. Barbosa and Mr. Mack resigned their positions as executive officers of the Company and such consulting agreements were terminated on the same date.

In December 2013, AGT Subsidiary entered into a consulting agreement with a consulting company to provide due diligence and advisory services in connection with merger, acquisition or other forms of business combination matters. The term of this agreement was for a period of the earlier of six months from the date of this agreement or until AGT Subsidiary consummated a business combination, whichever is earlier. AGT Subsidiary agreed to pay the consultant a fee of $100,000, payable in two installments of $ 50,000 each in January 2014 and February 2014. Additionally, if AGT Subsidiary consummates a business combination during the term of this agreement, the consultant was entitled to purchase a total of 1,500,000 shares of the common stock, or 7.88%, whichever is greater, of the combined entity at par value or $0.001 per share, whichever is less. On March 21, 2014 the Company sold 1,500,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at a purchase price of $1,500 or $0.001 per share to such consultant. The Company accounted for such transaction under ASC 505-50-30 “Equity-based payments to Non-employees” and accordingly recorded stock based compensation of $48,500 which is equal to the fair value of shares issued in excess of the purchase price of $1,500 (see Note 7). ASB 505-50-30 establishes that share-based payment transactions with nonemployees shall be measured at the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable. The Company has determined that the fair value of the consideration received is more reliably measurable.

General agreement

In November 2011, AGT Canada, AGT Subsidiary’s former parent, entered into a general agreement and contract (the “Original Agreement”) with Polarchem Associated Limited, Polarchem International Limited and the shareholders of those companies (collectively the “Polarchem”). ~~AGT~~ ~~Subsidiary~~The Company was formed to market and sell Polarchem’s proprietary technology solutions in North America under the terms of this agreement. AGT Canada agreed to act for Polarchem as its exclusive sales and service distributors in the United States, Canada and Mexico. ~~In February 2014, AGT Subsidiary entered into a 30 year license agreement with Polarchem which superseded the Original Agreement with AGT Canada.~~

F-13

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2014

NOTE 6 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (continued)

In February 2014 AGT Subsidiary entered into a 30 year license agreement with Polarchem Associated Limited, Polarchem International Limited and the shareholders of those companies granting AGT Subsidiary exclusive rights to the proprietary technology in the United States, Canada and Mexico (the “Territory”) which superseded the Original Agreement dated in November 2011 between AGT Canada and Polarchem. Such license agreement grants AGT Subsidiary the exclusive rights to use Polarchem’s licensed marks, to manufacture and sell their products and to provide the services within the Territory. AGT Subsidiary has been granted the right of first refusal to acquire all the assets of Polarchem as defined in the license agreement.

Operating lease

A lease agreement was signed for office and warehousing space consisting of approximately 5,000 square feet located in Mesa, Arizona with an initial term commencing on March 1, 2012 and expiring on March 1, 2015. In May 2014, the Company entered into a lease amendment whereby 600 plus square feet of office space has been added into the existing lease premises and extending the lease term up to February 28, 2020. The amended lease requires the Company to pay a monthly base rent of $3,300 plus a pro rata share of operating expenses. The base rent is subject to annual increases beginning on March 1, 2015 as defined in the amended lease agreement.

~~The base rent is subject to annual increases beginning on March 1, 2015 as defined in the amended lease agreement.~~ Future minimum rental payments required under this operating lease are as follows:

Total

1 year

12-3 years

34-5 years

5+ years

Operating lease

~~249~~184,~~600~~800

39,~~800~~600

~~130~~118,~~600~~800

7926,~~200~~400

—-

Total

~~249~~184,~~600~~800

39,~~800~~600

~~130~~118,~~600~~800

7926,~~200~~400

—-

Rent expense was $21,017, $40,312 and $21,830 for the six months ended June 30, 2014, for the year ended December 31, 2013 and for the period from February 14, 2012 (Inception) to December 31, 2012, respectively.F-25

~~NOTE~~AMERICA 7GREENER ~~– INCOME~~TECHNOLOGIES ~~TAXES~~INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

~~The~~NOTES ~~Company has~~TO ~~incurred~~CONSOLIDATED ~~aggregate~~FINANCIAL net operating losses of approximately $1,600,000 for income tax purposes as of June 30, 2014. The net operating loss can be carried forward to reduce future years’ taxable income and will expire, if not utilized, through 2034. Utilization of these tax net operating loss carry forwards may be limited in accordance with IRC Section 382 in the event of certain ownership changes. Management believes that the realization of the benefits from these losses is not more likely than not to occur due to the Company’s limited operating history and continuing losses. Accordingly, the Company has provided a 100% valuation allowance on the deferred tax asset to reduce the asset to zero. Management will review this valuation allowance periodically and make adjustments as warranted. The table below summarizes the differences between the Company’s effective tax rate and the statutory federal rate as follows for the year ended:STATEMENTS

	June 30, 2014			December 31, 2013			December 31, 2012
U.S “expected” income tax	$	(194,000	)	$	(295,000	)		(70,000	)
State income taxes, net of benefit		(34,000	)		(39,000	)		(9,000	)
Non-cash compensation		20,000			—			—
Change in valuation allowance		208,000			334,000			79,000
Total provision for income taxes	$	—		$	—			—

JUNE 30, 2015

NOTE 8 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (continued)

Rent expense was $49,400, $21,017, and $40,312 for the year ended June 30, 2015, for the six months ended June 30, 2014, and for the year ended December 31, 2013, respectively.

Patent Assignment

In July 2014, Gary Dean Wilson and Michael Dean Brown, the inventors of certain patented technology used by Soft Wave, assigned all of their right title and interest in and to that certain U.S. Patent No. 8,477,003, Serial No. 13/262.227 for apparatus for generating a multi-vibrational field to the Company in exchange for the payment of royalties. In September 2014, the Company agreed to pay a royalty of an aggregate of 5% to Mr. Wilson and Mr. Brown based on annual gross sales income related to the patent. Payment of royalty shall be on the 15th of the month following the receipt of the associated sales. The royalty shall have a maximum payout of $20 million. In October 2014, the Company orally re-negotiated the payments terms whereby the royalty has increased to 6% and royalties will be paid to Mr. Wilson, Mr. Brown and a few other key Soft Wave associates The Company expects to enter into a written agreement memorializing the current terms during fiscal 2015. During the year ended June 30, 2015, the Company recorded royalty expense of approximately $18,700. As of June 30, 2015, the Company has accrued royalty expense of approximately $18,700 in connection with the patent assignment.

NOTE 9 – INCOME TAXES

The Company has incurred aggregate net operating losses of approximately $2.8 million for income tax purposes as of June 30, 2015. The net operating loss can be carried forward to reduce future years’ taxable income and will expire, if not utilized, through 2035. Utilization of these tax net operating loss carry forwards may be limited in accordance with IRC Section 382 in the event of certain ownership changes. Management believes that the realization of the benefits from these losses is not more likely than not to occur due to the Company’s limited operating history and continuing losses. Accordingly, the Company has provided a 100% valuation allowance on the deferred tax asset to reduce the asset to zero. Management will review this valuation allowance periodically and make adjustments as warranted.

The table below summarizes the differences between the Company’s effective tax rate and the statutory federal rate as follows for the year ended:

	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
U.S “expected” income tax	$	(1,446,000	)	$	(194,000	)	$	(295,000	)
State income taxes, net of benefit		(248,000	)		(34,000	)		(39,000	)
Non-cash compensation		874,000			20,000			-
Change in valuation allowance		820,000			208,000			334,000
Total provision for income taxes	$	—		$	—		$	—

F-26

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2015

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of deferred tax assets and liabilities are as follows:

	June 30, 2014			December 31, 2013			December 31, 2012
	June 30, 2015			June 30, 2014			December 31, 2013
Deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryover	$	~~621~~1,144,000		$	~~413~~621,000		$	79413,000
Less: valuation allowance		(621,000	)		(413,000	)		(79,000	)
Amortization and impairment of intangible assets		297,000			-			-
Less: valuation allowance		(1,441,000	)		(621,000	)		(413,000	)
Net deferred tax asset	$	—		$	—		$	—

After consideration of all the evidence, both positive and negative, management has recorded a full valuation allowance at June 30, ~~2014~~2015, due to the uncertainty of realizing the deferred income tax assets. The valuation allowance was increased by $820,000, $208,000 and $334,000 during the year ended June 30, 2015, six months ended June 30, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013, respectively. Management does not believe that any uncertain tax positions have been taken in its 2012 and 2013 tax return or will be taken in its 2014 or 2015 tax ~~return~~returns.

F-1427

AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES INC. AND ~~SUBSIDIARY~~SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ~~JUNE 30, 2014~~

~~NOTE~~JUNE 930, ~~– TRANSITIONAL REPORT~~2015

~~The~~NOTE ~~following table~~10 ~~summarizes~~– ~~the~~TRANSITIONAL ~~audited and unaudited consolidated results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 (unaudited):~~ REPORT

	For the Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2014			June 30, 2013
	(Audited)			(Unaudited)
Net revenues	$	114,619		$	24,390
Gross profit		78,108			24,390
Loss from operations		(553,080	)		(307,505	)
Net loss		(555,302	)		(307,505	)
Weighted average per share – Basic and Diluted		17,276,362			15,000,000
Loss per common share – Basic and Diluted	$	(0.03	)	$	(0.02	)

The following table summarizes the audited consolidated results of operations for the year ended June 30, 2015, for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and for the year ended December 31, 2013:

The unaudited consolidated information above is for comparative and informational purposes only.

	For the Year Ended June 30, 2015			For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2014			For the Year Ended December 31, 2013
Net revenues	$	770,265		$	114,619		$	-
Gross profit		579,776			78,108			-
Loss from operations		(4,113,245	)		(553,080	)		(842,356	)
Net loss		(4,132,834	)		(555,302	)		(842,356	)
Weighted average per share – Basic and Diluted		19,875,952			17,276,362			8,000,000
Loss per common share – Basic and Diluted		(0.21	)		(0.03	)		(0.11	)

~~NOTE 10~~The –audited ~~SUBSEQUENT~~consolidated ~~EVENTS~~information above is for comparative and informational purposes only.

~~Between July~~NOTE ~~2014~~11 ~~and~~– ~~September~~SUBSEQUENT 2014, the Company issued 3% promissory note in the aggregate principal amount of $273,188. One of the note holders is a principal stockholder of the Company. These notes mature on July 1, 2015 and maybe prepaid in whole or in part without any penalty. These notes were used for working capital purposes.EVENTS

OnIn July 222015, ~~2014~~ the Company ~~entered~~sold ~~into a Joint Venture Agreement with Soft Wave Innovations~~200,000 ~~Inc.~~shares ~~(“Soft Wave”). Under the terms~~ of ~~this agreement,~~ the ~~parties agreed to undertake a joint venture which will permit the~~ Company’s tocommon ~~research~~stock ~~and develop, manufacture, market and service certain of the Soft Wave technology related to an apparatus~~ for ~~generating~~cash ~~a multi-vibrational field in worldwide residential, commercial~~ and ~~industrial~~received ~~markets~~net ~~including~~proceeds ~~energy~~of ~~and power generation~~$100,000 ~~petroleum~~or ~~and petrochemical, mining and mineral processing~~$0.50 ~~The~~per ~~parties will form a limited liability corporation to be called “Soft Wave Systems by America Greener Technologies, Inc~~share.” in order to conduct the joint venture which will be managed by the Company. A manager of the joint venture will be established which will be comprised of six members, with each party appointing three of the members.

~~The~~On ~~Company is~~August ~~required~~24th to2015, ~~make~~Ms. anCarrie ~~initial~~Borgen ~~cash~~and ~~contribution~~Mr. ofRick ~~$25~~Barbosa,~~000~~ to the ~~joint~~former ~~venture,~~executive asofficers ~~well~~of asthe upCompany, toconverted a total of $5090,000 ~~for~~in ~~the~~unsecured ~~design,~~loans ~~development and~~to ~~construction~~secured ofloans ~~new~~using ~~power~~Uniform ~~plant~~Commercial ~~cooling~~Code ~~tower~~(“UCC”) ~~system~~Liens signed by Mr. Mike Boyko, the former CEO of the Company. The Company isdo ~~also~~not ~~required~~believe tothe ~~provide~~approval ~~any~~of ~~necessary~~the ~~ongoing~~then ~~funding until~~board ~~such~~of ~~time~~directors aswas ~~the~~obtained ~~joint~~at ~~venture~~the ~~has~~time ~~sufficient~~of ~~funds~~the ~~from~~granting ~~cash~~of ~~flows~~the tosecurity ~~operate~~interest. The ~~Soft~~Company ~~Wave~~have isengaged legal counsel to ~~receive~~evaluate athe ~~draw~~validity of ~~$20,000 per~~the ~~month~~granting ~~against~~of ~~future~~the ~~earnings~~security interest. ~~The~~If ~~profits~~it should be ultimately determined that these former officers and ~~losses~~directors ofhave a valid security interest in the ~~joint~~Company’s ~~venture~~assets, ~~will~~in bethe ~~split~~event ~~50%/50%~~that bythe ~~our~~Company ~~company~~is ~~and~~unable ~~Soft~~to ~~Wave~~satisfy the amounts due them, they could foreclose on the Company’s assets.

The term of the joint venture will continue until the earlier of: (i) the dissolution upon the mutual consent of the parties; (ii) the termination under the terms of the Joint Venture Agreement; (iii) at such time as the parties agree to modify the terms whereby Soft Wave would receive shares of the Company’s common stock or royalty payments, or (iv) if there are $1 million in sales within 18 months from the date of the agreement. The Joint Venture Agreement also contains customary mutual indemnification provisions, as well as a confidentiality, nonF-~~compete and non-circumvention provision.~~28

~~F-15~~ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.

~~AMERICA GREENER TECHNOLOGIES INC~~None. ~~AND SUBSIDIARY~~

~~NOTES TO~~ITEM ~~CONSOLIDATED~~9A. CONTROLS ~~FINANCIAL~~AND ~~STATEMENTS JUNE 30, 2014~~PROCEDURES.

~~NOTE~~Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. We are required to maintain “disclosure controls and procedures” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based on their evaluation as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K, –our ~~SUBSEQUENT~~Chief ~~EVENTS~~ Executive Officer who also serves as our principal financial and accounting officer, has concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that the information relating to our company, required to be disclosed in our Securities and Exchange Commission reports (~~continued~~i) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms, and (ii) is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure as a result of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting described below.

~~In lieu of pursuing the relationship with Soft Wave under the joint venture structure, the Company has subsequently entered into discussions with its principals regarding the Company~~Management’s ~~possible~~Report ~~acquisition~~on ofInternal ~~Soft~~Control ~~Wave’s~~over ~~assets,~~Financial ~~including its customer base and manufacturing operations~~Reporting. Our Inmanagement preparation of entering into a definitive agreement, in September 2014 two of the Soft Wave principals who held the patent rights to Soft Wave’s technology assigned those patent rights to the Company. The Company is ~~presently negotiating~~responsible ~~terms~~for toestablishing ~~acquire Soft Wave, but have yet to sign a definitive agreement. The Company’s ability to consummate a transaction is dependent not only upon entering into a definitive agreement upon terms~~ and ~~conditions~~maintaining ~~which~~adequate ~~are~~internal ~~mutually~~control ~~agreeable, but~~over ~~ensuring that the Company’s auditors are able to audit Soft Wave’s~~ financial ~~statements~~reporting ~~for~~as ~~the~~defined ~~periods and~~ in ~~the~~ ~~timeframe~~Rules ~~necessary~~13a-15(f) ~~to conform with the requirements of the rules~~ and ~~regulations~~15d-15(f) ofunder the Securities ~~and~~ Exchange ~~Commission~~Act of 1934. If Our ~~for~~internal ~~some~~control ~~reason~~over ~~the~~financial ~~Company~~reporting is ~~unable~~designed to ~~obtain~~provide ~~the~~reasonable ~~necessary~~assurance ~~Soft~~regarding ~~Wave audited financial statements,~~ the ~~Company~~reliability ~~would~~of ~~assign the~~financial ~~patent~~reporting ~~rights back to the original inventors~~ and ~~not proceed with~~ the ~~proposed~~preparation ~~transaction. Given the level~~ of ~~uncertainty that~~financial ~~the~~statements ~~Company~~for ~~will~~external bepurposes ~~able~~in toaccordance ~~consummate~~with ~~this~~generally ~~transaction,~~accepted ~~investors~~accounting ~~should not place undue reliance on this pending transaction when evaluating the Company’s prospects~~principles. Our ~~The~~internal ~~Company~~control isover ~~still~~financial ~~evaluating~~reporting ~~the~~includes ~~accounting~~those ~~impact~~policies ofand ~~the~~procedures ~~Soft Wave transaction.~~that:

On● ~~August~~pertain ~~28, 2014, the Company granted an aggregate of 1,800,000 five year options~~ to ~~purchase shares of common stock under~~ the ~~Company’s 2014~~maintenance ~~Equity Compensation Plan to three officers~~ of ~~the~~records ~~Company~~that, ~~four~~in ~~employees~~reasonable ofdetail, ~~the~~accurately ~~Company~~ and ~~one~~fairly ~~consultant.~~reflect ~~The options vest immediately on~~ the ~~date~~transactions ~~of grant~~ and ~~are~~dispositions ~~exercisable at $0.60 per share. The 1,800,000 options were valued on the grant date at approximately $0.71 per option or a total~~ of ~~$1,278,000~~our using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: stock price of $0.80 per share (based on the quoted trading prices on the date of grant), volatility of 135% (based from volatilities of similar companies), expected term of 5 years, and a risk free interest rate of 1.63%.assets;

~~F-16~~● provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

●

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2015. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Management's assessment included an evaluation of the design of our internal control over financial reporting and testing of the operational effectiveness of these controls. Based on this assessment, our management has concluded that as of June 30, 2015, our internal control over financial reporting was not effective to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles as a result of material weaknesses, due to the following:

●

Deficiencies in segregation of duties. Lack of proper segregation of functions, duties and responsibilities with respect to our cash and control over the disbursements related thereto due to our very limited staff, including our accounting personnel.

●

Deficiencies in the staffing of our financial accounting department. The number of qualified accounting personnel with experience in public company SEC reporting and GAAP is limited and we are reliant upon the services of a part-time accounting consultant. This weakness does not enable us to maintain adequate controls over our financial accounting and reporting processes regarding the accounting for non-routine and non-systematic transactions. There is a risk that a material misstatement of the financial statements could be caused, or at least not be detected in a timely manner, by this shortage of qualified resources.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.

None, except as previously reported.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE.

The following table provides information on our current executive officers and directors.

Name	Age	Positions

John P. Mooney	76	Director, President, Chief Executive Officer, principal financial and accounting officer

John P. Mooney. Mr. Mooney has served as an officer and director of our company since September 2015. Since 1986, Mr. Mooney has served as Chief Executive Officer, President and a director of Globe Net Financial Group, a division of Pacific Venture Marketing Corporation, a private financial consulting firm based in Richmond, British Columbia, which he controls. From 2012 until our acquisition of the entity in March 2014, he also served as an officer and director of our subsidiary, AGT Arizona.

Director Qualifications, Board Leadership Structure and Risk Management

Since September 2015 Mr. Mooney has served as our sole director and sole officer. Mr. Mooney is one of the company’s largest single shareholders and has agreed to serve, on an interim basis. Mr. Mooney has extensive experience in debt negotiations and corporate restructuring in the public company sector and has been a serial entrepreneur and executive. Mr. Mooney agreed to serve because of the abrupt resignation of our prior management and the board of directors.

Our Board considered Mr. Mooney's professional experience as a president and chief executive officers of three Canadian public company and his role in negotiating and securing the Polarchem license agreement for AGT Arizona in determining his qualification to serve as a director of our company.

Risk is inherent with every business, and how well a business manages risk can ultimately determine its success. We face a number of risks, including liquidity risk, operational risk, strategic risk and reputation risk. Mr. Mooney serves as both our Chief Executive Officer and sole member of our board of directors. We do not have any independent directors. The business and operations of our company are managed by our Board as a whole, including oversight of various risks, such as operational and liquidity risks that our company faces.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Our sole director is not an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of Item 401(e) of Regulation S-K. In general, an “audit committee financial expert” is an individual member of the audit committee or board of directors who:

●

understands generally accepted accounting principles and financial statements,

●

is able to assess the general application of such principles in connection with accounting for estimates, accruals and reserves,

●

has experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial statements comparable to the breadth and complexity of our financial statements,

●

understands internal controls over financial reporting, and

●

understands audit committee functions.

Director Compensation

During fiscal 2015 directors who were our executive officers did not receive any compensation for services as directors. The following table provides information on the compensation paid to our independent directors in fiscal 2015.

	Director Compensation
Name	Fees earned or paid in cash ($)		Stock awards ($)		Option awards ($)(1)		Non-equity incentive plan compensation ($)		Nonqualified deferred compensation earnings ($)		All other compensation ($)		Total ($)

James Mack (2)		0		0		284,000		0		0		0		284,000
John D. Hofmeister (3)		0		0		183,635		0		0		0		183,635
Daniel J. McCauley III (4)		0		0		210,762		0		0		0		210,762

(1) The amounts included in the “Option Awards” column represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the stock options granted to directors during fiscal 2015, computed in accordance with ASC Topic 718. The assumptions made in the valuations of the option awards are included in Note 7 of the notes to our consolidated financial statements appear later in this report.

(2) Mr. Mack served as a member of our board of directors until September 2, 2015. The amount of director compensation paid to Mr. Mack excludes fees paid to him under a consulting agreement. See "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" appear later in this report.

(3) Mr. Hofmeister served as a member of our board of directors from March 9, 2015 until September 2, 2015.

(4) Mr. McCauley served as a member of our board of directors from April 30, 2015 until September 2, 2015.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

●	public disclosure reporting,

●	insider trading,

●	discrimination and harassment,

●	health and safety,

●	conflicts of interest,

●	competition and fair dealing, and

●	protection of company assets.

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION.

The following table summarizes all compensation recorded by us in the past two years for:

●

our principal executive officer or other individual serving in a similar capacity,

●

our two most highly compensated executive officers other than our principal executive officer who were serving as executive officers at June 30, 2015 as that term is defined under Rule B-7 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and

●

up to two additional individuals for whom disclosure would have been required but for the fact that the individual was not serving as an executive officer at June 30, 2015.

For definitional purposes, these individuals are sometimes referred to as the “named executive officers.”

Summary Compensation Table
Name and principal position	Year	Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($) (1)		No equity incentive plan compensation ($)		Non-qualified deferred compensation earnings ($)		All other compensation ($)		Total ($)

Michael C. Boyko (1)	2015		138,000		0		0		284,000		0		0				422,000
	2014		0		0		0		0		0		0		60,000		60,000

Carrie Borgen (2)	2015		108,000		0		0		181,819		0		0		0		289,819

(1) Mr. Boyko served as our President and Chief Executive Officer from March 2014 until August 2015.

(2) Ms. Borgen served as our Chief Financial Officer from October 2014 until September 2015, and as our Chief Executive Officer and member of our board of directors from August 2015 until September 2015.

How the executive’s compensation is determined

Our subsidiary, AGT Arizona, was a party to an Independent Contractor Agreement dated January 1, 2013 with Mr. Boyko. As compensation, AGT Arizona paid Mr. Boyko a fee of $10,000 per month and reimbursement for out of pocket travel expenses. In September 2014, the terms of the consulting agreement with Mr. Boyko were orally modified pursuant to which the compensation payable under the agreement was increased from $10,000 per month to $12,000 per month. Mr. Boyko’s agreement was terminated upon his resignation on August 31, 2015.

Upon hiring Ms. Borgen as our Chief Financial Officer in October 2014 we agreed to pay Ms. Borgen a salary of $12,000 per month under an oral agreement. We also granted her options to purchase 300,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.70 per share as additional consideration.

Mr. Mooney, who was appointed our Chief Executive Officer in September 2015, is currently serving without compensation.

Outstanding equity awards at fiscal year-end

The following table provides information concerning unexercised options, stock that has not vested and equity incentive plan awards for each named executive officer outstanding as of June 30, 2015:

OPTION AWARDS										STOCK AWARDS
Name	Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Exercisable		Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Options (#) Unexercisable		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Securities Underlying Unexercised Unearned Options (#)		Option Exercise Price ($)		Option Expiration Date	Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested (#)		Market Value of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested ($)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Number of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights that Have Not Vested (#)		Equity Incentive Plan Awards: Market or Payout Value of Unearned Shares, Units or Other Rights That Have Not Vested (#)
Michael C. Boyko		400,000		0		0		0.60	08/28/19		0		0		0		0
Carrie Borgen		300,000		0		0		0.70	10/01/19		0		0		0		0

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.

At October 2, 2015, we had 20,684,848 shares of our common stock issued and outstanding which is our only class of voting securities. The following table sets forth information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of October 2, 2015 by:

●

each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock;

●

each of our directors;

●

each of our named executive officers; and

●

our named executive officers, directors and director nominees as a group.

Name of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership		% of Class
John P. Mooney (1)		3,673,096		17.9	%
All officers and directors as a group (one person)(1)		3,673,096		17	%
Michael E. Boyko (2)		2,724,921		13.2	%
Insurance Marketing Solutions, LLC (3)		1,822,601		8.8	%
James Corrigan (4)		1,312,335		6.3	%
Russell Corrigan (5)		1,147,335		5.5	%

(1) The number of shares owned by Mr. Mooney includes (i) 3,583,096 shares of our outstanding common stock, and (ii) 90,000 shares underlying a convertible promissory note, all of which are held by Pacific Venture Marketing Corporation, a Canadian corporation over which he has voting and dispositive control.

(2) Mr. Boyko served as our Chief Executive Officer and a member of our board of directors until August 2015. Mr. Boyko's address is 935 South 132 Street, Gilbert, AZ 85233.

(3) Mr. C. Leo Smith, formerly our sole officer and director until March 2013, holds voting and dispositive control over these shares. Insurance Marketing Solutions, LLC’s address is 900 SE Third Avenue, Suite 202, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33316.

(5) Mr. Corrigan’s address is 19315 3 A Avenue Surrey BC Canada V3S 9R9. Since September 2015 Mr. Corrigan has been assisting us with various transitional matters following the resignations of our prior officers and directors. While we are not a party to any consulting or other agreement with him presently and are not compensating him for his assistance to Mr. Mooney, in the future we may formally engage him to provide services to us upon terms and conditions which have yet to be negotiated.

Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans

Plan category	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights (a)		Weighted average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
Plans approved by our stockholders:
2014 Equity Compensation Plan		3,000,000		0.64		0
Plans not approved by stockholders:		0		0		0

2014 Equity Compensation Plan

●	incentive stock options (ISOs),

●	non-qualified options (NSOs),

●	awards of our common stock, or

●	rights to make direct purchases of our common stock which may be subject to certain restrictions.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.

From time to time AGT Canada, then AGT Arizona’s parent company, advanced AGT Arizona funds for working capital. These advances, which totaled $1,201,261 for 2013, were due on demand. AGT Canada forgave these advances, as well as all amounts advanced to AGT Arizona up to the closing of our acquisition of AGT Arizona on March 19, 2014.

AGT Arizona is a party to an Independent Contractors Agreement dated January 1, 2013 with Mr. James Mack, formerly a member of our board of directors. In addition to his former role as a member of our board of directors, Mr. Mack was AGT Arizona’s environmental and governmental liaison. As compensation, AGT Arizona paid Mr. Mack a fee of $4,000 per month and reimbursement for out of pocket travel expenses. During fiscal 2015 and 2014, AGT Arizona paid Mr. Mack total consulting fees of $48,000 and 48,000, respectively. This agreement contains customary confidentiality provisions and may be terminated by either party upon 30 days notice. Mr. Mack’s agreement was terminated upon his resignation on September 2, 2015.

In January 2014 and February 2014 Mr. James Corrigan and Pacific Venture Marketing Corporation lent AGT Arizona an aggregate of $100,000. AGT Arizona used these funds for working capital. Pacific Venture Marketing Corporation is an entity controlled by Mr. Mooney, a principal stockholder of our company who has also served as our sole officer and director since September 2015. In March 2014 AGT Arizona issued 3% convertible promissory notes to each of Mr. Corrigan and Pacific Venture Marketing Corporation evidencing these advances. The notes are unsecured and the principal and accrued interest was initially due on June 30, 2014. In August 2014, effective June 30, 2014, the lenders extended the due dates of the notes until December 31, 2014. On December 30, 2014, the maturity date was extended to July 2015. At the option of either the holder or AGT Arizona, the principal and accrued interest is convertible in whole into shares of our common stock at a conversion price of $0.40 per share. These promissory notes matured on July 1st 2015 and are expected to be renewed by the holders.

In January 2014, Mr. Barbosa, formerly our Chief Operating Officer and a member of our board of directors, advanced AGT Arizona $5,000 for working capital. The advance, which was due on demand and interest free, was repaid in January 2014. In May 2014, Mr. Barbosa advanced $10,000 to us for working capital. The May 2014 advance, which was due on demand and bore 3% interest, was repaid in May 2014. Between September 2014 and March 2015, the Company’s former COO provided advances to AGT Subsidiary for working capital purposes for $18,000. The advance was due on demand and interest free. We repaid $3,000 in November 2014 leaving a balance of $15,000 as of June 30, 2015.

Between November 2014 and March 2015, our former CFO, Ms. Borgen, provided advances to us for working capital purposes for $75,000. The advances were due on demand and interest free. As of June 30, 2015, advances owed to the former CFO amounted to $75,000.

In March 2015, our former CEO, Mr. Boyko, provided advances to us of $2,500 for working capital purposes. The advance was due on demand and interest free. As of June 30, 2015, advances owed to the former CEO amounted to $2,500.

Between May 2014 and September 2014 Pacific Ventures Marketing Corporation lent us an additional $223,359 under the terms of 3% promissory notes which matured on July 1, 2015. We used these funds for working capital. These promissory notes matured on July 1,2015 and are expected to be renewed by the holder.

Director Independence

Our sole director is not considered “independent” within the meaning of meaning of Rule 5605 of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES.

The following table shows the fees that were billed for the audit and other services provided by our independent registered public accounting firms for fiscal 2015 and fiscal 2014.

	Fiscal 2015		Fiscal 2014

Audit Fees	$	40,000	$	25,000
Audit-Related Fees		20,000		0
Tax Fees		0		0
All Other Fees		0		0
Total	$	60,000	$	25,000

All Other Fees — This category consists of fees for other miscellaneous items.

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.

(a)(1) Financial statements.

●

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

●

Consolidated balance sheets at June 30, 2015, June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013

●

Consolidated statements of operations for year ended June 30, 2015, six months ended June 30, 2014 and for the year ended December 31, 2013

●

Consolidated statements of cash flows for year ended June 30, 2015, six months ended June 30, 2014 and for the year ended December 31, 2013

●

Consolidated statement of changes in stockholders’ equity for year ended June 30, 2015, six months ended June 30, 2014 and for the year ended December 31, 2013

●

Notes to consolidated financial statements

(b) Exhibits.

3.1	Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to the registration statement on Form S-1, SEC File No. 333-146163, declared effective by the SEC on October 5, 2007 (the “S-1”))
3.2	Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K as filed on June 22, 2010)
3.3	Bylaws (incorporated by reference to the S-1)
10.1	Form of Share Exchange Agreement Form of Share Exchange Agreement dated February 25, 2014 by and among Osler Incorporated, America Greener Technologies Incorporated and the shareholders of America Greener Technologies Incorporated (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 27, 2014) ***
10.2	Independent Contractor Agreement dated January 1, 2013 by and between American Greener Technologies Corporation and Michael C. Boyko (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2014)
10.3	Independent Contractor Agreement dated January 1, 2013 by and between American Greener Technologies Corporation and Energetics Consulting, LLC (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2014)
10.4	Independent Contractor Agreement dated January 1, 2013 by and between American Greener Technologies Corporation and James Mack (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2014)
10.5	Licensing Agreement dated February 12, 2014 by and among Polarchem Associates Limited, Polarchem International Limited, America Greener Technologies Corporation, Ulf Tore Walden, David H. Idwal Jones and Georges Berberat (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2014)***
10.6	Consulting Agreement dated December 20, 2013 by and between America Greener Technologies Corporation and PAN Consultants Ltd. (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2014)
10.7	2014 Equity Compensation Plan (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2014)
10.8	Lease Agreement dated February 8, 2012 by and between America Greener Technologies Corporation and MP Mulberry, LLC (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2014)
10.9	3% convertible promissory note dated March 17, 2014 in the principal amount of $64,000 payable to James Corrigan (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2014)
10.10	3% convertible promissory note dated March 17, 2014 in the principal amount of $36,000 due Pacific Venture Marketing Corporation (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2014)
10.11	Addendum to Lease Agreement dated May 1, 2014 by and between America Greener Technologies, Inc. and MP Mulberry LLC (incorporated by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the transition period ended June 30, 2014)
10.12		Asset Purchase Agreement dated October 31, 2014 by and among America Greener Technologies, Inc., AGT Soft Wave, Inc. and Soft Wave Innovations, Inc. (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 6, 2014)***
10.13		Form of note extension dated December 30, 2014 (incorporated by reference to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2014)
10.14		Consulting Agreement dated April 6, 2015 by and between America Greener Technologies, Inc. and Emmanuel Kouyoumdjian (incorporated by reference to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2014)
10.15		3% Promissory Note dated April 14, 2015 in the principal amount of $99,980 due Doug Corrigan (incorporated by reference to the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2014)
14.1	Code Business Conduct and Ethics adopted March 19, 2014 (incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2014)
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer *
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of principal financial and accounting officer *
32.1	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer and principal financial and accounting officer*
101.INS	XBRL Instance Document*
101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase *
101.LAE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase *
101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase *
101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema *

*	filed herewith.

***	Schedules omitted pursuant to Item 601(b)(2) of Regulation S-K. The registrant agrees to furnish a supplemental copy of any omitted schedule to the SEC upon request.

****

Portions of this exhibit have been omitted pursuant to a request for confidential treatment filed with the Commission under Rule 24b-2. The omitted confidential material has been filed separately with the Commission. The location of the omitted confidential information is indicated in the exhibit with asterisks (***).

SIGNATURES

	America Greener Technologies, Inc.

October 13, 2015	By:	/s/ John P. Mooney
		John P. Mooney
		Chief Executive Officer, principal financial and accounting officer

Name	Positions	Date

/s/ John P. Mooney	Chief Executive Officer, director, principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer	October 13, 2015
John P. Mooney

Filing Compare · America Greener Technologies, Inc.