SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

þ	Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the fiscal year ended March 31, ~~2011~~2012

o	Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from ~~________~~____________ to ~~________~~____________

Commission File Number 0-30595

ORPHEUM PROPERTY, INC.

(Exact name of ~~small~~registrant ~~business issuer~~ in its charter)

Delaware		33-0619256
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
201 St. Charles Avenue – Suite 2534 New Orleans, LA		70170
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (504) 599-5697

201 St. Charles Ave. Suite 2500 New Orleans, LA		70170
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (808) 478-7894

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, par value $0.001

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes o No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. ~~YES~~Yes þ NO No o

Check if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in response to Item 405 of Regulation S-B is not contained in this form, and no disclosure will be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer o ~~Smaller reporting company þ~~ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company þ

~~State~~Indicate ~~issuer's~~by ~~revenues~~check ~~for~~mark ~~its~~whether ~~most~~the ~~recent~~registrant ~~fiscal~~is ~~year: $~~a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-0-2 of the Act). Yes o No þ

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter: $1,650,000 based on a closing sale price of $ 1.10 on that date.

The number of shares outstanding of the issuer's classes of Common Stock as of ~~March~~September 3130, ~~2011~~2012:

Common Stock, $0.001 Par Value – 6178,~~461~~183,~~336~~728 shares ~~Preferred Stock $.001 Par Value -0-~~

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: NONE

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

When used in this Form 10-K, the words “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Such statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, including those set forth below under “Risks and Uncertainties,” that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. These forward-looking statements speak only as of the date hereof. We expressly disclaim any obligation or undertaking to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in the Company’s expectations with regard thereto or any change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any statement is based. This discussion should be read together with the financial statements and other financial information included in this Form 10-K.

Background

~~On May 20, 2003,~~ Orpheum Property, Inc., ~~formerly~~(“Orpheum” ~~known~~or the “Company”) was originally formed as a Delaware corporation under the name of Back Channel Investments, Inc., ain ~~publicly~~April ~~reporting~~1994. The ~~Delaware~~Company ~~corporation~~was formed ~~in April 1994~~ solely to seek for and make an acquisition. On May 20, 2003, the Company entered into an acquisition ~~agreement~~ whereby it acquired all of the common stock of Orpheum Property, Inc., a Hawaii corporation formed on February 14, 2003. There were two officers, directors and shareholders of the Hawaii ~~Corporation~~corporation. The acquisition was effected as a tax free share exchange, with the two shareholders of Orpheum Property, Inc. (Hawaii) receiving 7,000,000 new shares of common stock and the existing shareholders of the Delaware parent retaining all of their 3,000,000 shares (after giving effect to a 3-for-1 forward stock split) of common stock, which were originally issued in April 1994 for total consideration of $1,015 ($0.0003 per share). The stockholders of Orpheum Property, Inc. (Hawaii) believed that the acquisition would enable their company to benefit from being part of a reporting company, that the combined entity would likely be able to become publicly trading, and that it would be better able to attract debt or equity financing for its business. No promoter or any other person was paid or compensated in connection with the acquisition. . There was no particular value assigned to the shares of either company since neither had any appreciable assets or history of operations. ~~The~~As ~~Delaware~~a ~~Corporation~~result of these transaction, the Company subsequently changed its name from Back Channel Investments, Inc. to Pacific Land and Coffee Corporation and then in 2010, to Orpheum Property, Inc. Unless we state otherwise, all references to Orpheum Property, Inc. refer to the combined entity.

On November 6, 2006, Alfred Coscina, a director, officer and shareholder, contributed 100% of his interest in Coscina Brothers Coffee, LLC to the Company. Mr. Coscina did not receive any item of value in return for the capital contribution. Coscina Brothers Coffee, LLC was the Company’s principal supplier and is in the same principal business as the Company. The results of operations of the Company include the operations of Coscina Brothers Coffee, LLC from November 6, 2006.

On December 18, 2007, we acquired 70.3% of the outstanding common stock of Integrated Coffee Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation herein as (“Integrated Coffee Technologies”). The acquisition was effected pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization dated December 18, 2007. In connection with the acquisition, ~~the~~we ~~Registrant~~ issued 7,644,149 newly authorized shares of common stock, and reserved 4,355,850 additional shares for the acquisition of the remaining Integrated Coffee Technologies shares. Since December 18, 2007 through March 31, 2008, an additional 892,904 shares were issued to exchanging Integrated Coffee Technologies shareholders, bringing our ownership of Integrated Coffee Technologies up to 75.54%. The operations of Integrated Coffee Technologies have been suspended due to lack of capital to develop this business and we have written off the technology associated with this business.

On June 28, 2010, we acquired 129 University Place, LLC, whose sole asset was the Orpheum Theater, a property of historical renown, but unusable without significant renovations. It is intended that through the use of available tax credits we would be able to fund that project and restore the theater to its former glory. In connection with the acquisition, the Company issued 42,260 Class B Preferred shares to the owners of 129 University Place, LLC, obligated itself to issue ~~shares of common~~ stock valued at $3,474,000 to former investors in the Orpheum project, and assumed demand obligations with a principal amount due of $2,698,360 and accrued interest of $33,130.

The executive offices of the Company are located at 201 St. Charles Avenue, Suite ~~2534~~2500, New Orleans, LA 70170. The telephone number is ~~504~~808-~~599~~478-~~5697~~7894.

Our Operations

As of March 31, 2011, Orpheum Properties, Inc. did not have any revenue producing operations. Our focus subsequent to that date is expanding our asset base through acquisitions of land and properties. We have also invested in a project in Baja, Mexico, which is expected to begin selling large quantities of decorative stones and is projected to produce significant revenues. Also, we have recently acquired the performance contracts of our CEO, Morris Kahn which will generate revenues beginning in 2012.

Our Operations

As of March 31, 2012, Orpheum Properties, Inc. did not have any operations generating current revenue. The acquisition of certain tax-credit consulting contracts made during the year ended March 31, 2012, from Kahn & Associates is anticipated to begin generating revenues during the year ended March 31, 2013. We are looking at additional purchases during the next fiscal period that will contribute to revenues.

Employees

As of March 31, ~~2011~~2012, we had no employees.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

The securities of Orpheum Property, Inc. are highly speculative and very risky. Before you buy consider the following risk factors and the rest of this report.

We are still in the development stage and may never be successful.

Orpheum Property, Inc.'s activities have been limited. There can be no assurance that Orpheum Property, Inc. will be able to develop sufficient revenues through our various operations, although Orpheum Property, Inc. can continue to exist indefinitely at its current level if its officers continue to fund its operating deficit. If we do not increase our level of operations our common stock will not attain any value in any market that might develop, and investors will not be able to realize any value from their ownership of shares.

We need funding to implement our business plan.

Orpheum Property, Inc. is in need of approximately $50,000,000 in funding to carry out its business plan for the next ~~twelve~~12 months for continued investments and general and administrative expenses. We intend to raise these funds through sales of ~~company~~Company stock, both common and preferred.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

~~The~~This ~~Securities~~section ~~and~~is ~~Exchange Commission has submitted inquiries to us that question why we did~~ not ~~treat~~required ~~the~~for ~~purchase~~smaller ofreporting ~~129 University Place, LLC as a reverse merger~~companies. After exhaustive analysis, valuations and expert consultation, we determined that the purchase of 129 University Place, LLC, was an asset purchase according to prevailing accounting literature as has been reflected on past quarterly reports and submissions. One of the components to qualify as a business combination, and in this case a reverse merger, both entities must qualify as operating businesses. In our case, 129 University Place, LLC had one asset, the Orpheum Theater, but had no history or plans to operate as a business, including the receiving of inputs and outputs. Prior to 129 University Place, LLC obtaining the Orpheum Theater, the property was held by another owner merely as an inventory item.

ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

We rent 200 square feet of office space under a lease expiring in October 2014.

ITEM 3. LEGALPROCEEDINGS

Orpheum Property, Inc. is not a party to any pending legal proceedings.

ITEM 4. ~~SUBMISSION~~ MINE OFSAFETY ~~MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS~~DISCLOSURES

~~No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended March 31, 2011.~~NA

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER’S PURCHASE OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Our common stock commenced trading in the quarter ended June 30, 2005 under the symbol PLCF.OB on the OTC Bulletin Board. The symbol was changed to PLFF.OB in September 2007 in connection with a one-for-three reverse stock split effective September 25, 2007. In ~~the~~On ~~three~~December ~~years ended March 31~~10, 2010, the ~~high~~Company ~~and~~effected ~~low~~a ~~trading~~one ~~prices (adjusted~~ for ~~the~~twenty reverse ~~split)~~stock ~~were as follows:~~split.

Quarter Ended	High		Low
June 30, 2007		0.90		0.90
September 30, 2007		0.90		0.60
December 31, 2007		1.90		0.60
March 31, 2008		1.82		1.01
June 30, 2008		1.75		1.55
September 30, 2008		1.55		1.55
December 31, 2008		1.55		1.55
March 31, 2009		1.55		0.57
June 30, 2009		2.00		0.57
September 30, 2009		2.00		2.00
December 31, 2009		2.00		2.00
March 31, 2010		2.00		2.00
June 30, 2010		2.00		2.00
September 30, 2010		3.00		2.00
12/31/2010 *		20.00		0.20
3/31/2011 *		1.50		1.01

In the two years ended March 31, 2012 the high and low trading prices were as follows:

* Subsequent to December 10, 2010 20:1 stock split These prices do not include retail mark up and mark down and may not represent actual transactions. As of March 31, 2011, there were approximately 300 holders of common stock.

		High		Low


June 30, 2010			2.00		2.00
September 30, 2010			3.00		2.00
December 31, 2010	*		20.00		0.20
March 31, 2011	*		1.50		1.01

June 30, 2011	*		1.50		0.23
September 30, 2011	*		0.51		0.10
December 31, 2011	*		0.15		0.10
March 31, 2012	*		2.74		0.13

4* Subsequent to 12/10/11 20:1 Stock split These prices do not include retail mark up and mark down and may not represent actual transactions. As of March 31, 2012, there were approximately 382 holders of common stock.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

~~The~~This ~~Registrant~~information is not required tofor ~~supply this information because it is~~ a smaller reporting company.

~~ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OR PLAN OF OPERATIONS~~4

InITEM ~~our plan of operation for fiscal 2010-11 we stated a need to find a third party to acquire the public shell for the purpose of generating additional investment capital~~7. As MANAGEMENT'S ~~disclosed~~DISCUSSION inAND ~~the~~ANALYSIS ~~notes~~OF toFINANCIAL ~~the~~CONDTIONS ~~financial~~AND ~~statements,~~RESULTS ~~such~~OF an investor was located and prior to June 30, 2010, a deal was consummated which includes the contribution of real estate which significantly increases the net assets and equity of the Company. Additionally, the coffee company and research subsidiaries were sold to former Directors, which helped the company in eliminating a material amount of liabilities.OPERATIONS

In our plan of operation for fiscal 2010-11 we stated a need to find a third party to acquire the public shell for the purpose of generating additional investment capital. As disclosed in the Notes to the Financial Statements, such an investor was located and prior to June 30, 2010, a deal was consummated which includes the contribution of real estate which significantly increased the net assets and equity of the Company. Additionally, the coffee company and research subsidiaries were sold to former Directors, which helped the company in eliminating a material amount of liabilities.

Information included in this report includes forward looking statements, which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as may, will, expect, anticipate, believe, estimate, or continue, or the negative thereof or other variations thereon or comparable terminology. The statements in "Risk Factors" and other statements and disclaimers in this report constitute cautionary statements identifying important factors, including risks and uncertainties, relating to the forward-looking statements that could cause actual results to differ materially from those reflected in the forward-looking statements.

Since we have not yet generated significant and consistent revenues, we are a development stage company as that term is defined in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 915. Our activities to date have been limited to seeking capital; seeking supply contracts and development of a business plan. Our auditors have included an explanatory paragraph in their report on our financial statements, relating to the uncertainty of our business as a going concern, due to our lack of operating history or current revenues, its nature as a ~~start~~startup up business, management's limited experience and limited funds. We do not believe that conventional financing, such as bank loans, is available to us due to these factors. Management believes that it will be able to raise the required funds for operations from one or more future offerings, in order to ~~implement~~affect our business plan. No terms have been discussed, and we cannot predict the price or terms of any offering nor the amount of dilution existing shareholders may experience as a result of such offering.

Forward looking information

Due to the significant change in operations during our fiscal year and subsequent to our year end, forward looking information related to our current operations would not be useful. As the re-organization and revamping of operations of the public company appear to be favorable, the recent changes do not have adequate historical documentation to formulate a definitive plan of action beyond stating that the company’s intention is to acquire additional investment capital and purchase numerous other properties for improvement, restoration and development.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

This information is not required for a smaller reporting company.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

LaPorte, APAC 111 Veterans Blvd. | Suite 600 Metairie, LA 70005 504.835.5522 | Fax 504.835.5535 LaPorte.com

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

ToThe ~~the~~ Board of Directors and Shareholders

Orpheum Property, Inc. (a development stage company)

New Orleans, Louisiana:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Orpheum Property, Inc. (a development stage company) as of March 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related statements of operations, ~~changes in~~ stockholders' ~~equity~~deficit, and cash flows for the ~~year~~years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the period from inception (February 14, 2003) through March 31, ~~2011~~2012. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’'s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. The financial statements of Orpheum Property, Inc. for the year ended March 31, 2010 were audited by other auditors whose report, dated July 22, 2010, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the ~~auditing~~ standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company has determined that it is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our ~~audits~~audit ~~provide~~provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Orpheum Property, Inc. (a development stage company) as of March 31, ~~2011~~2012, and the results of its operations and ~~its~~ cash flows for the ~~year~~years ~~then~~ ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, and for the period offrom inception (February 14, 2003) to March 31, ~~2011~~2012 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that Orpheum Property, Inc. will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has limited operating capital with limited revenue from operations. Realization of a major portion of the assets is dependent upon the Company’s ability to meet its future financing requirements, and the success of future operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustment that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

As more fully described in Notes 65, 8, 9 and 812 to the financial statements, the Company has transactions with related parties primarily to cover the Company’s cash flow needs associated with its operating expenses as well as in regards to its development of certain real estate assets.

LaPorte, A Professional Accounting Corporation

~~Metairie~~October 15, ~~Louisiana~~2012

August 6, 2012

NEW ORLEANS HOUSTON BATON ROUGE COVINGTON An Independently Owned Member, McGladrey Alliance The McGladrey Alliance is a premier affiliation of independent accounting and consulting firms. The McGladrey Alliance member firms maintain their name, autonomy and independence and are responsible for their own client fee arrangements, delivery ol services and maintenance ol client relationships.

ORPHEUM PROPERTY, INC

(A Development Stage Company)

~~ORPHEUM PROPERTY INC (A Development Stage Company)~~ BALANCE SHEETS

ASSETS
	March 31,		March 31,
	2011		2010
	2012		2011
Assets
Current Assets
Cash in Bank	$	~~727~~274	$	~~8,628~~727
Accounts Receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $-0- and $3,248		-		19,378
Prepaid Expenses		-		5,000
Prepaid Expenses		5,000		400
Total Current Assets		274		5,727
Total Current Assets		5,727		28,406
Fixed Assets
Equipment		-		63,057
Unimproved properties		7,350,995		-
Leasehold Improvements		-		2,827
Improved properties		7,969,559		6,296,935
Construction in Progress - Orpheum Theatre		6,296,935		-
Less: Accumulated Depreciation		-		-
Less: Accumulated Depreciation		-		(56,288	)
Total Fixed Assets		15,320,554		6,296,935
Total Fixed Assets		6,296,935		9,596
Other Assets
Rent Deposit		-		3,979
Investment - Contracts		555,502		-
Total Other Assets		-555,502		~~3,979~~-
Total Assets	$	6,302,662	$	41,981
TOTAL ASSETS	$	15,876,330	$	6,302,662

The accompanying notes are an integral part of ~~these~~the financial statements.

ORPHEUM PROPERTY INC (A Development Stage Company) BALANCE SHEETS (Continued)

LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
	March 31,			March 31,
	2012			2011

Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable	$	63,198		$	31,867
Accrued Interest		649,930			299,143
Demand Note - Orpheum - Note 4		2,698,360			2,698,360

Total Current Liabilities		3,411,488			3,029,370

Long Term Liabilities		-			-

Total Liabilities		3,411,488			3,029,370

Stockholders' Equity
Preferred Stock Class A - 1,000,000 shares authorized;
Stated value of $5.00 per share; 40,000 and 0 shares
issued and outstanding at March 31, 2012 and
March 31, 2011, respectively		200,000			-
Common Stock - 500,000,000 shares authorized;
Par value of $.001 per share; 178,183,728 shares
and 6,461,336 shares issued and outstanding
at March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively		178,184			6,462
Stock to be Issued		1,752,000			3,415,734
Capital in excess of par value		15,045,042			3,133,706
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(4,710,384	)		(3,282,610	)

Total Stockholders' Equity		12,464,842			3,273,292

TOTAL LIABILITIES & STOCKHOLDERS'
EQUITY	$	15,876,330		$	6,302,662

	March 31,			March 31,
	2011			2010
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
Current Liabilities
Accounts Payable	$	31,867		$	150,574
Credit Line		-			24,690
Payroll and Excise Taxes Payable		-			23,914
Payable - Jones Day		-			552,505
Advances by Officer		-			26,250
Current Portion - Long Term Debt		-			9,934
Accrued Interest		299,143			-
Demand Note - Orpheum		2,698,360			-
Total Current Liabilities		3,029,370			787,867
Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
Preferred Stock Class A - 1,000,000 shares authorized;
Par value of $.001 per share; 0 and 900,000 shares
issued and outstanding		-			900
Common Stock - 50,000,000 shares authorized;
Par value of $.001 per share; 6,461,336 shares
and 638,744 shares issued and outstanding		6,462			639
Stock Payable		3,415,734			-
Additional paid in capital		3,133,706			971,151
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(3,282,610	)		(1,567,742	)
Total Orpheum Property, Inc. Stockholders'
Equity (Deficit)		3,273,292			(595,052	)
Non-Controlling Interest		-			(150,834	)
Total Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)		3,273,292			(745,886	)
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)	$	6,302,662		$	41,981

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

ORPHEUM PROPERTY, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

STATEMENTS OF OPERATION

For the Years Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011

~~ORPHEUM PROPERTY INC (A Development Stage Company) STATEMENTS OF OPERATION For the Years Ended March 31, 2011~~ and ~~2010 and~~ for the ~~Period~~Perod from Inception (February 14, 2003) Through March 31, ~~2011~~2012

							February 14,
							2003 through
	For the Year Ended March 31,						March 31,
	2011			2010			2011
	2012			2011			2012
Revenues
Sales	$	-		$	-		$	-
Total Revenues		-			-			-
Cost of Sales		-			-			-
Gross Profit		-			-			-
General and Administrative Expenses		1,427,644			82,453			1,730,474
General & Administrative Expenses		1,080,987			1,427,644			2,811,461
Net Loss from Operations		(1,~~427~~080,~~644~~987	)		(821,~~453~~427,644	)		(12,~~730~~811,~~474~~461	)
Other Income (Expense)
Other Income (Expense):
Other Income		-			20,900			96,215
Other revenue		4,000			-			4,000
Interest Expense		(~~264~~350,~~870~~787	)		(15264,~~203~~870	)		(~~287~~638,~~763~~550	)
Total Other (Income) Expense		(264,870	)		5,697			(287,763	)
Total Other Income (Expense)		(346,787	)		(264,870	)		(634,550	)
Net Loss from Continuing Operations		(1,~~692~~427,~~514~~774	)		(761,~~756~~692,514	)		(23,~~018~~446,~~237~~011	)
Discontinued Operations		~~6,113~~-			~~(86~~6,~~719~~113	)		(1,235,906	)
Loss - Sale of Discontinued Operations		(28,467	)		-			(28,467	)
Loss - Sale of Disc. Operations		-			(28,467	)		(28,467	)
Net Loss	$	(1,~~714~~427,~~868~~774	)	$	(~~163~~1,~~475~~714,868	)	$	(34,~~282~~710,~~610~~384	)
Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share
Basic and Diluted Income (Loss) Per Share
Continuing Operations	$	(10.0502	)	$	(01.1205	)
Discontinued Operations		-			~~(0.14~~-	)
Net Loss per Share	$	(10.0502	)	$	(01.2605	)
Weighted Average Shares Outstanding (Adjusted for 20 to 1 Reverse Stock Split on December 10, 2010)		1,615,550			638,744
Weighted Average Shares
Outstanding		82,663,796			1,615,550

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

ORPHEUM PROPERTY, INC. (A Development Stage Company) ~~Statement~~STATEMENTS ofOF ~~Stockholders'~~CASH ~~Equity~~FLOWS ~~(Deficit)~~ For the ~~Period~~Years Ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the Perod from Inception (February 14, 2003) Through ~~March~~December 31, ~~2011~~2007

													Additional						Non			Common		Net
	For the Year				For the Year				February 14,
	Preferred			Preferred			Common			Common			Paid in			Accumulated			Controlling			Stock		Stockholder's
	Ended				Ended				2003 through
	Shares			Stock			Shares			Stock			Capital			Deficit			Interest			Payable		Equity (Deficit)
	March 31,				March 31,				March 31,
Balance February 14, 2003		-		$	-			-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-	$	-
	2012				2011				2012
Shares issued to initial stockholders for cash		-			-			166,667			167			835			-			-			-		1,002
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Contributed Capital-Corporate
Net Loss	$	(1,427,774	)		$	(1,714,868	)		$	(4,710,384	)
Organization and Start-up Costs, at
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities
Inception, Services and Costs at
Contribution of interest on advances by officer		-				-				24,071
Estimated Fair Market Value		-			-			-			-			1,000			-			-			-		1,000
Common Stock issued for conversion of subsidiary stock		-				-				6,881
Net Loss from February 14, 2003
Stock Issued for payment of fees		840,750				1,333,465				2,302,998
(Inception) to March 31, 2003		-			-			-			-			-			(1,195	)		-			-		(1,195	)
Contributed Capital - noncash fair market value of start-up and organization services and costs		-				-				1,000
Balance, March 31, 2003		-			-			166,667			167			1,835			(1,195	)		-			-		807
Bad debt recognized - Hales Receivable		-				25,000				25,000
Cash contributed for Working Capital		-			-			-			-			1,978			-			-			-		1,978
(Increase) Decrease in Prepaid expenses		5,000				(5,000	)			-
Net Loss - Year Ended March 31, 2004		-			-			-			-			-			(1,176	)		-			-		(1,176	)
Increase (Decrease) in accounts payable		31,331				(19,555	)			63,198
Balance, March 31, 2004		-			-			166,667			167			3,813			(2,371	)		-			-		1,609
Increase (Decrease) in accrued interest		350,787				266,013				616,800
Net Loss - Year Ended March 31, 2005		-			-			-			-			-			(6,695	)		-			-		(6,695	)
Net Cash Used by Operating Activities		(199,906	)			(114,945	)			(1,670,436	)
Balance, March 31, 2005		-			-			166,667			167			3,813			(9,066	)		-			-		(5,086	)
Cash Flow from Investing Activities
Net Loss - Year Ended March 31, 2006		-			-			-			-			-			(7,733	)		-			-		(7,733	)
Improvements to Orpheum Theater		(118,126	)			(124,575	)			(242,701	)
Balance, March 31, 2006		-			-			166,667			167			3,813			(16,799	)		-			-		(12,819	)
Escrow refunds, net of fees paid		15,583								15,583
Cash contributed by shareholders		-			-			-			-			3,500			-			-			-		3,500
Cash investments to Baja Coastal		(10,000	)			-				(10,000	)
Net Loss - Year Ended March 31, 2007		-			-			-			-			-			(52,841	)		-			-		(52,841	)
Net Cash Used by Investing Activities		(112,543	)			(124,575	)			(237,118	)
Balance, March 31, 2007		-			-			166,667			167			7,313			(69,640	)		-			-		(62,160	)
Cash Flow from Financing Activities
Issuance of Preferred Shares		900,000			900			(45,000	)		(45	)		(855	)		-			-			-		-
Proceeds from the sale of stock/contributed cash		321,996				184,043				977,519
Issuance of Shares for Service		-			-			74,715			75			91,459			-			-			-		91,534
Proceeds from notes payable - related party		-				-				49,700
Conversion of Debt to Shares		-			-			2,489			2			93,260			-			-			-		93,262
Payment on OKC payable		(10,000	)			-				(10,000	)
Issuance of Shares for Merger		-			-			382,207			382			76,059			-			28,884			-		105,325
Proceeds from advances from former officer - net		-				75,000				30,000
Adjustment for Conversion of ICTI Stock		-			-			44,645			45			43,259			-			(43,304	)		-		-
Proceeds from mergers		-				-				304,540
Adjustment for ICTI stock changes		-			-			-			-			360,620			-			173,361			-		533,981
Payment to reduce Stock to be Issued		-				(22,500	)			(22,500	)
Net Loss - Year Ended March 31, 2008		-			-			-			-			-			(328,249	)		(55,776	)		-		(384,025	)
Net Cash Provided (Used) by Financing Activities		311,996				236,543				1,329,259
Balance, March 31, 2008		900,000			900			625,723			625			671,115			(397,889	)		103,165			-		377,916
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash		(453	)			(2,977	)			(578,295	)
Adjustment for Conversion of ICTI Stock		-			-			13,021			13			6,869			-			(6,882	)		-		-
Beginning Cash Balance		727				8,628				----
Contribution of Interest earned by Shareholder		-			-			-			-			6,796			-			-			-		6,796
Cash provided (used) by Discontinued Operating Activities		-				(4,924	)			578,569
Net Loss - Year Ended March 31, 2009		-			-			-			-			-			(1,005,177	)		(241,866	)		-		(1,247,043	)
Ending Cash Balance	$	274			$	727				274
Balance, March 31, 2009		900,000			900			638,744			638			684,780			(1,403,066	)		(145,583	)		-		(862,331	)
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Cash paid during the year for interest		-				-				-
Cash paid during the year for income taxes		-				-				-
Business Acquisitions
Fair value of assets acquired	$	-			$	6,172,360			$	7,447,703
Issuance of debt/assumption of liabilities		-				-				(1,170,013	)
Liabilities assumed		-				(2,731,490	)			(2,760,379	)
Stock Issued at acquisition		-				(84,520	)			(160,961	)
Capital in Excess of Par		-				(3,356,350	)			(3,356,350	)
Asset Acquisitions
Unimprovevd properties		6,979,078				-				6,979,078
Contracts		555,502				-				555,502
Prepaid tax credit consulting costs		944,498				-				944,498
Issuance of debt/assumption of liabilities		(14,878	)			-				(14,878	)
Stock Issued at acquisition		(43,743	)			-				(43,743	)
Capital in Excess of Par		(6,730,457	)			-				(6,730,457	)
Stock to be issued		(1,690,000	)			-				(1,690,000	)
Capitalized real estate commissions paid via issuance of common stock		997,500				-				997,500

The accompanying notes are an integral part of ~~these~~the financial statements.

ORPHEUM PROPERTY INC (A Development Stage Company) Statement of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) (Continued) For the Period from Inception (February 14, 2003) Through March 31, 2011

ORPHEUM PROPERTY INC
(A Development Stage Company)
Statement of Stockholder's Equity (Deficit)
For the Perod from Inception (February 14, 2003) Through March 31, 2011

													Capital in			Accu-			Non			Common			Net
	Preferred			Preferred			Common			Common			Addition			mulated			Controlling			Stock			Stockholder's
	Shares			Stock			Shares			Stock			Par Value			Deficit			Interest			to be Issued			Equity(Deficit)

Balance February 14, 2003		-		$	-			-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-		$	-

Shares issued to initial stockholders for cash		-			-			166,667			167			835			-			-			-			1,002

Contributed Capital-Corporate
Organization and Start-up Costs, at
Inception, Services and Costs at
Estimated Fair Market Value		-			-			-			-			1,000			-			-			-			1,000

Net Loss from February 14, 2003
(Inception) to March 31, 2003		-			-			-			-			-			(1,195	)		-			-			(1,195	)

Balance, March 31, 2003								166,667			167			1,835			(1,195	)		-			-			807

Cash contributed for Working Capital		-			-			-			-			1,978			-			-			-			1,978

Net Loss - Year Ended March 31, 2004		-			-			-			-			-			(1,176	)		-			-			(1,176	)

Balance, March 31, 2004		-			-			166,667			167			3,813			(2,371	)		-			-			1,609

Net Loss - Year Ended March 31, 2005		-			-			-			-			-			(6,695	)		-			-			(6,695	)

Balance, March 31, 2005		-			-			166,667			167			3,813			(9,066	)		-			-			(5,086	)

Net Loss - Year Ended March 31, 2006		-			-			-			-			-			(7,733	)		-			-			(7,733	)

Balance, March 31, 2006		-			-			166,667			167			3,813			(16,799	)		-			-			(12,819	)

Cash contributed by shareholders		-			-			-			-			3,500						-			-			3,500

Net Loss - Year Ended March 31, 2007		-			-			-			-			-			(52,841	)		-			-			(52,841	)

Balance, March 31, 2007		-			-			166,667			167			7,313			(69,640	)		-			-			(62,160	)

Issuance of Preferred Shares		900,000			900			(45,000	)		(45	)		(855	)		-			-			-			-
Issuance of Shares for Service		-			-			74,715			75			91,459			-			-			-			91,534
Conversion of Debt to Shares		-			-			2,489			2			93,260			-			-			-			93,262
Issuance of Shares for Merger		-			-			382,207			382			76,059			-			28,884			-			105,325
Adjustment for Conversion of ICTI Stock		-			-			44,645			45			43,259			-			(43,304	)		-			-
Adjutment for ICTI stock changes		-			-			-			-			360,620			-			173,361			-			533,981

Net Loss - Year Ended March 31, 2008		-			-			-			-			-			(328,249	)		(55,776	)		-			(384,025	)

Balance, March 31, 2008		900,000			900			625,723			625			671,115			(397,889	)		103,165			-			377,916

Adjustment for Conversion of ICTI Stock		-			-			13,021			13			6,869						(6,882	)		-			-
Contribution of Interest earned by
Shareholder		-			-			-			-			6,796			-			-			-			6,796

Net Loss - Year Ended March 31, 2009		-			-			-			-			-			(1,005,177	)		(241,866	)		-			(1,247,043	)

Balance, March 31, 2009		900,000			900			638,744			638			684,780			(1,403,066	)		(145,583	)		-			(862,331	)

Conversion of Officer Debt to Equity		-			-			-			-			269,097			-			-			-			269,097
Imputed interest		-			-			-			-			17,275			-			-			-			17,275

Net Loss - Year Ended March 31, 2010		-			-			-			-			-			(164,676	)		(5,251	)		-			(169,927	)

Balance, March 31, 2010		900,000			900			638,744			638			971,152			(1,567,742	)		(150,834	)		-			(745,886	)

Issuance of Class B Preferred Stock
& purchase of Orpheum		42,260			84,520			-			-			(117,650	)		-			-			3,474,000			3,440,870
Conversion Class A Preferred Stock
to Common Stock		(900,000	)		(900	)		45,000			45			855			-			-			-			-
Issuance of Common Stock		-			-			66,251			66			(66	)		-			-			-			-
Sale of Integrated Coffee Tech. &
Coscina Coffee Brothers		-			-			-			-			643,319			-			150,834			-			794,153
Donation from Officer		-			-			-			-			4,015			-			-			-			4,015
Conversion - Preferred to Common		(42,260	)		(84,520	)		4,226,000			4,226			80,294			-			-			-			-
Conversion of Stock to be Issued		-			-			137,561			138			35,628			-			-			(35,766	)		-
Payment to reduce Stock to be Issued		-			-			-			-			-			-			-			(22,500	)		(22,500	)
Issuance of Common Stock for services		-			-			1,347,780			1,348			1,332,117			-			-			-			1,333,465
Investment by Shareholder		-			-			-			-			184,043			-			-			-			184,043

Net Loss - Year Ended 03/31/11		-			-			-			-			-			(1,714,868	)		-			-			(1,714,868	)

Balance, March 31, 2011		-			-			6,461,336			6,461			3,133,707			(3,282,610	)		-			3,415,734			3,273,292

Shares issued to avoid anti-dilution		-			-			52,930,845			52,931			(52,931	)		-			-			-			-
Issued for purchase of Property
Arkansas		-			-			80,000			80			19,120			-			-			-			19,200
Calfornia/Nevada		-			-			14,596,153			14,596			3,780,404			-			-			-			3,795,000
Oklahoma City		-			-			28,000,000			28,000			2,772,000			-			-			190,000			2,990,000
Hot Springs		-			-			1,066,667			1,067			158,933			-			-			-			160,000
Issued for purchase of Investment
Baja Coastal Property		-			-			42,194,605			42,193			(42,195	)		-			-			-			(2	)
Contracts		-			-			-			-			-			-			-			1,500,000			1,500,000
Issued for payment of cash		-			-			700,000			700			49,300			-			-			2,000			52,000
Conversion of "To Be Issued Stock"		-			-			15,797,969			15,798			3,399,936			-			-			(3,415,734	)		-
Stock issued/To Be Issued for services		40,000			200,000			16,356,153			16,356			1,527,644			-			-			60,000			1,804,000
Investment by Shareholder		-			-			-			-			299,125			-			-			-			299,125
Rounding		-			-			-			1			(1	)		-			-			-			-

Net Loss - Year Ended 03/31/12		-			-			-			-			-			(1,427,774	)		-			-			(1,427,774	)

Balance, March 31, 2012		40,000		$	200,000			178,183,728		$	178,183		$	15,045,042		$	(4,710,384	)	$	-		$	1,752,000		$	12,464,841

											Additional						Non			Common			Net
	Preferred			Preferred			Common		Common		Paid in			Accumulated			Controlling			Stock			Stockholder's
	Shares			Stock			Shares		Stock		Capital			Deficit			Interest			Payable			Equity (Deficit)
Balance, April 1, 2009		900,000		$	900			638,744	$	638	$	684,780		$	(1,403,066	)	$	(145,583	)	$	-		$	(862,331	)
Conversion of Officer Debt to Equity		-			-			-		-		269,097			-			-			-			269,097
Imputed interest		-			-			-		-		17,275			-			-			-			17,275
Net Loss - Year Ended March 31, 2010		-			-			-		-		-			(164,676	)		(5,251	)		-			(169,927	)
Balance, March 31, 2010		900,000			900			638,744		638		971,152			(1,567,742	)		(150,834	)		-			(745,886	)
Issuance of Class B Preferred Stock and purchase of Orpheum		42,260			84,520			-		-		(117,650	)		-			-			3,474,000			3,440,870
Conversion Class A Preferred Stock to Common Stock		(900,000	)		(900	)		45,000		45		855			-			-			-			-
Issuance of Common Stock		-			-			66,256		66		(66	)		-			-			-			-
Sale of Integrated Coffee Tech. and Coscina Coffee Brothers		-			-			-		-		643,319			-			150,834			-			794,153
Donation from Officer		-			-			-		-		4,015			-			-			-			4,015
Conversion - Preferred to Common		(42,260	)		(84,520	)		4,226,000		4,226		80,294			-			-			-			-
Conversion of Stock Payable		-			-			137,561		138		35,628			-			-			(35,766	)		-
Payment to reduce Stock Payable		-			-			-		-		-			-			-			(22,500	)		(22,500	)
Issuance of Common Stock for services		-			-			1,347,775		1,348		1,332,117			-			-			-			1,333,465
Investment by Shareholder		-			-			-		-		184,043			-			-			-			184,043
Net Loss - Year Ended March 31, 2011		-			-			-		-		-			(1,714,868	)		-			-			(1,714,868	)
Balance, March 31, 2011		-		$	-			6,461,336	$	6,461	$	3,133,707		$	(3,282,610	)	$	-		$	3,415,734		$	3,273,292

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the financial statements

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

ORPHEUM PROPERTY INC (A Development Stage Company) STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS For the Years Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 and for the Period from Inception (February 14, 2003) Through March 31, 2011

	For the Year			For the Year			February 14,
	Ended			Ended			2003 through
	March 31,			March 31,			March 31,
	2011			2010			2011
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net Loss	$	(1,714,868	)	$	(163,475	)	$	(3,282,610	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net used in operating activities
Contribution of interest on advances by officer		-			20,306			24,071
Common Stock issued for conversion of subsidiary stock		-			-			6,881
Stock issued for payment for consulting services		1,333,465			-			1,462,248
Contributed Capital - noncash fair market value of start-up and organization services and costs		-			-			1,000
Bad debt recognized - Loss on sale of discontinued operations		25,000			-			25,000
(Increase) Decrease in Prepaid expenses		(5,000	)		-			(5,000	)
Increase (Decrease) in accounts payable		(19,555	)		4,746			31,867
Increase (Decrease) in accrued interest		266,013			-			266,013
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities		(114,945	)		(138,423	)		(1,470,530	)
Cash Flow from Investing Activities
Improvements to Orpheum Theater		(124,575	)		-			(124,575	)
Net Cash Used in Investing Activities		(124,575	)		-			(124,575	)
Cash Flow from Financing Activities
Proceeds from the sale of stock/contributed cash		184,043			-			655,523
Proceeds from notes payable - related party		-			-			49,700
Proceeds from advances from former officer - net		75,000			92,746			30,000
Proceeds from mergers		-			-			304,540
Payment to reduce Stock Payable		(22,500	)		-			(22,500	)
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		236,543			92,746			1,017,263
Net Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents		(2,977	)		(45,677	)		(577,842	)
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Period		8,628			10,313			-
Cash (Used in) Provided by Discontinued Operating Activities		(4,924	)		43,992			578,569
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period	$	727		$	8,628		$	727

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

ORPHEUM PROPERTY INC (A Development Stage Company) STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued) For the Years Ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 and for the Period from Inception (February 14, 2003) Through March 31, 2011

	For the Year			For the Year		February 14,
	Ended			Ended		2003 through
	March 31,			March 31,		March 31,
	2011			2010		2011
Supplemental Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
Cash paid during the year for interest	$	-		$	1,673	$	-
Cash paid during the year for income taxes	$	-		$	-	$	-
Supplemental Disclosure of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities
Impact of Sale of Discontinued Operations
Liabilites assumed in excess of assets released	$	794,153		$	-	$	-
Reduction in Noncontrolling Interest of Discontinued Operations		(150,834	)		-		-
Increase in Additional Paid in Capital		(643,319	)		-		-
Net Transaction	$	-		$	-	$	-
Business Acquisitions
Value of assets acquired	$	6,172,360		$	-	$	7,447,703
Issuance of debt/assumption of liabilities		-			-		(1,170,013	)
Liabilities assumed		(2,731,490	)		-		(2,760,379	)
Stock Issued at acquisition		(84,520	)		-		(160,961	)
Capital in Excess of Par		(3,356,350	)		-		(3,356,350	)
Net Transaction	$	-		$	-	$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Orpheum Property, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to the Financial Statements

March 31, ~~2011~~2012

Note 1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Organization Orpheum Property, Inc. (the Company) was organized under the laws of the State of Delaware on February 14, 2003, and has elected a fiscal year end of March 31st. The Company was originally organized for the purpose of the research and development of tropical plantation plants, to own and sell real and personal property and to sell products. The Company’s previous name was Pacific Land and Coffee Corporation. However, on October 22, 2010, the Company filed a Schedule 14C with the Securities and Exchange Commission in order to change the name of the Company to Orpheum Property, Inc. Currently, the Company is involved in the development and renovation of commercial property. On May 20, 2003, the Company combined with Back Channel Investments, Inc., in a reverse merger pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization. Back Channel acquired all the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company in exchange for 7,000,000 shares of Back Channel’s common stock. The surviving entity was Orpheum Property, Inc. Upon completion of the agreement, the combined Company essentially re-capitalized to have 10,000,000 shares outstanding. No change in net book value or goodwill was recognized. Subsequently, in August, 2007, these shares were reduced to 3,333,332 shares through a reverse stock split. The pre-merger financial statements of Orpheum Property, Inc. are now the historical financial statements of the Company. Seeking to redirect its activities, on June 28, 2010, the Company acquired 129 University Place whose sole asset was the Orpheum Theater with the intention of restoring the historic commercial property. The transaction involved the issuance of 42,260 shares of a new class of Preferred Stock (B) with a par value of $2.00 per share and convertible into 2,000 shares of common stock for each share of preferred. The purchase price of the property was $6,172,360 with the Company assuming an existing liability on the property of $2,698,360 and an obligation to issue Company stock valued at $3,474,000. Basis of Presentation and Discontinued Operations The financial statements as of and for the year ended March 31, 2010, as well as for the period of inception (February 14, 2003) through March 31, 2010 include the accounts of Orpheum Property, Inc. (formerly known as Pacific Land & Coffee Corporation) and its majority owned subsidiaries, Coscina Brothers Coffee Company and Integrated Coffee Technologies, Inc. On June 30, 2010, the board of directors elected to dispose the coffee-related businesses and focus on building a real estate portfolio, and the coffee related businesses were sold to former directors of the Company. Accordingly, the activity of the coffee related businesses through June 30, 2010 has been accounted for as discontinued operations and the results of operations of the coffee related businesses have been removed from the results of continuing operations for all periods presented. The accompanying balance sheet as of March 31, 2011 reflects the financial position of Orpheum Property, Inc. after the liquidation of the coffee related business in June 2010. The Company is considered a development stage company as defined in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 915. The Company has at the present time, not paid any dividends and any dividends that may be paid in the future will depend upon the financial requirements of the Company and other relevant factors.

(a) Organization

Orpheum Property, Inc. (the “Company”) was organized under the laws of the State of Delaware on February 14, 2003 as Back Channel Investments, Inc. The Company has elected a fiscal year end of March 31st. The Company was originally organized for the purpose of the research and development of tropical plantation plants, to own and sell real and personal property and to sell products. Currently, the Company is involved in the development and renovation of commercial property.

On May 20, 2003, the Company combined with Back Channel Investments, Inc., in a reverse merger pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization. Back Channel acquired all the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company in exchange for 7,000,000 shares of Back Channel’s common stock. The surviving entity was the Company. Upon completion of the reverse merger, the combined Company was re-capitalized to have 10,000,000 shares outstanding. No change in net book value or goodwill was recognized. Subsequently, in August, 2007, these shares were reduced to 3,333,332 shares through a reverse stock split. The pre-merger financial statements of Orpheum Property, Inc. are now the historical financial statements of the Company.

Seeking to redirect its activities, on June 28, 2010, the Company acquired 129 University Place LLC, whose sole asset was the Orpheum Theater with the intention of restoring the historic commercial property. The transaction involved the issuance of 42,260 shares of a new class of Preferred Stock (B) with a par value of $2.00 per share and convertible into 2000 shares of common stock for each share of preferred. The purchase price of the property was $ 6,172,360 with the Company assuming an existing liability on the property of $2,698,360 and an obligation to issue Company stock valued at $3,474,000.

The Company is considered a development stage company as defined in Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 915. The Company has at the present time, not paid any dividends and any dividends that may be paid in the future will depend upon the financial requirements of the Company and other relevant factors.

(b) Basis of Presentation and Discontinued Operations

The financial statements as of and for the year ended March 31, 2011, as well as for the period of inception (February 14, 2003) through March 31, 2011 include the accounts of Orpheum Property, Inc., and the activity of its former majority owned subsidiaries, Coscina Brothers Coffee Company and Integrated Coffee Technologies, Inc. On June 30, 2010, the board of directors elected to dispose of the coffee-related business and focus on building a real estate portfolio, and the coffee-related business were sold to former directors of the Company. Accordingly, the activity of the coffee-related businesses through June 30, 2010 has been accounted for as discontinued operations and the results of operations of the coffee-related businesses have been removed from the results of continuing operations for all periods presented.

The Company applies the provisions of FASB ASC Topic 740, Income Taxes. Topic 740 requires an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for income taxes, and the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities at enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when such amounts are realized or settled. Due to a loss from inception, the Company has no tax liability. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are reflected at currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes.

(d) Use of Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

(e) Basic Loss Per Common Share

The Company computes basic loss per common share in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 260-10, Earnings Per Share. Basic loss per common share is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed using weighted average number of common shares plus dilutive common shares equivalents outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Because the Company incurred losses for the years ended March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011, the effect of any equivalent shares for each year would be excluded from the loss per share computation since the impact would be antidilutive. There were no common stock equivalents outstanding at March 31, 2012 and March 31, 2011.

(f) Revenue Recognition

Revenues of the Company will be recognized as earned in accordance with the nature of the income as it occurs. Anticipated revenues in future periods is expected from event receipts earned at the renovated theater, operating income from commercial properties in the Orpheum portfolio, and gains from the sale of properties that may be purchased. Revenues will not be recognized until such time as the service has been completed or escrows have closed.

(g) Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the useful lives (5-7 years) of the related assets. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expenses as incurred.

As of March 31, 2012, the Company had not placed any of its fixed assets into service, therefore no depreciation is included for the year then ended.

(h) Impairment of Long-lived Assets

Long-lived tangible assets, including property, plant and equipment, and finite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the book value of the asset or asset groups may not be recoverable. The Company evaluates, regularly, whether events and circumstances have occurred that indicate possible impairment and relies on a number of factors, including operating results, business plans, economic projections, and anticipated future cash flows. The Company uses an estimate of the future undiscounted net cash flows of the related asset or asset group over the remaining life in measuring whether the assets are recoverable. Measurement of the amount of impairment, if any, is based upon the difference between the asset’s carrying value and estimated fair value.

(i) Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

(j) Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In June 2009, the FASB changed the accounting guidance for the consolidation of variable interest entities. The current quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise is the primary beneficiary of the variable interest entity will be replaced with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity. The new guidance became effective for the Company on April 1, 2010 with no impact on its financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB changed the accounting guidance for transfers of financial assets. The new guidance increases the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial reports about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its statement of financial condition, financial performance and cash flows; and a continuing interest in transferred financial assets. In addition, the guidance amends various concepts associated with the accounting for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities including removing the concept of qualified special purpose entities. This new guidance was adopted by the Company on April 1, 2010 with no impact on its financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (Topic 820) that requires new disclosures related to fair value measurements and clarifies existing disclosure requirements about the level of disaggregation, inputs and valuation techniques. Specifically, reporting entities now must disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. In addition, in the reconciliation for Level 3 fair value measurements, a reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities for disclosure of fair value measurement, considering the level of disaggregated information required by other applicable U.S. GAAP guidance and should also provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for each class of assets and liabilities. The guidance was effective for financial statements issued for periods ending after December 15, 2009, except for disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in reconciliation for Level 3 fair value measurements, which was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance affects only the disclosure requirements and had no impact on the Company’s statements of operations and condition.

In December 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that modified Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist such as if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. This new authoritative guidance was effective April 1, 2011 and did not have any impact on the Company’s financial statements.

~~Note~~In 1.April ~~Organization~~2011, ~~and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Income Taxes The Company applies~~ the ~~provisions of~~ FASB ~~ASC~~issued ~~Topic~~ASU ~~740~~2011-02, ~~Income~~which ~~Taxes.~~amends ~~Topic 740 requires an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for income taxes, and~~ the ~~recognition~~guidance ~~of deferred tax assets and liabilities~~ for ~~the~~evaluating ~~temporary~~whether ~~differences between~~ the ~~financial~~restructuring ~~reporting basis and tax basis~~ of ~~the~~a ~~Company’s~~receivable ~~assets~~by ~~and~~a ~~liabilities~~creditor atis ~~enacted~~a ~~tax~~troubled ~~rates~~debt ~~expected~~restructuring ~~to be in effect when such amounts are realized or settled~~(“TDR”). In ~~Due~~evaluating towhether a ~~loss~~restructuring ~~from~~constitutes ~~inception,~~a ~~the~~TDR ~~Company~~both has no tax liability. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are reflected at currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets and liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for ~~income~~purposes ~~taxes. Use~~ of ~~Estimates~~recording inan ~~Preparation~~impairment ofloss ~~Financial Statements The preparation of financial statements in conformity with Accounting Principles Generally Accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates~~ and ~~assumptions~~for ~~that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and~~ disclosure ofpurposes, ~~contingent~~a ~~assets~~creditor ~~and~~must ~~liabilities~~separately atconclude ~~the~~that ~~date~~both of the ~~financial~~following ~~statements~~exist: ~~and~~(a) the ~~reported~~restructuring ~~amounts~~constitutes ofa ~~revenue~~concession; and ~~expenses~~(b) ~~during~~ the ~~reporting~~debtor ~~period.~~is ~~Actual~~experiencing ~~results~~financial ~~could differ from those estimates~~difficulties. For ~~Basic~~public ~~Loss per Common Share The Company computes basic loss per common share in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 260-10~~companies, ~~Earnings Per Share. Net loss is divided by~~ the ~~weighted-average~~new ~~number~~guidance ~~of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share~~ is ~~computed~~effective ~~using weighted average number of common shares plus dilutive common shares equivalents outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Because the Company incurred losses~~ for ~~the~~interim ~~years ended March 31, 2011~~ and ~~2010,~~annual ~~the~~periods ~~effect~~beginning ofon ~~any~~or ~~equivalent~~after ~~shares~~June ~~for each year would be excluded from the loss per share computation since the impact would be antidilutive. There were no common stock equivalents outstanding as March 31~~15, 2011, and ~~2010.~~applies ~~Revenue~~retrospectively ~~Recognition~~to ~~Revenues~~restructurings ofoccurring ~~the~~on ~~Company~~or ~~will~~after ~~be recognized as earned in accordance with~~ the ~~nature~~beginning of the ~~income~~annual asperiod itof ~~occurs~~adoption. ~~Anticipated revenues in future periods is expected from event receipts earned at the renovated theater~~ However, ~~operating~~an ~~income~~entity ~~from~~should ~~commercial~~apply ~~properties~~prospectively ~~invested~~changes ~~into,~~in ~~and gains from~~ the ~~sale~~method ofused ~~properties~~to ~~that~~calculate ~~may be purchased~~impairment. Revenues will not be recognized until such time as the service has been completed or escrows have closed. For prior periods the Company recorded accounts receivable for sales (from Discontinued Operations) which had been delivered but for which money had not been collected as of March 31, 2010. The balance uncollected as of March 31, 2010 was $22,626. At ~~March 31, 2010,~~ the ~~Company~~same ~~had~~time ana ~~allowance~~public ~~for~~entity ~~uncollectible~~adopts ~~accounts~~ASU ~~of $3~~2011-02,~~248.~~ ~~The~~it ~~allowance for doubtful accounts, which~~ is ~~based~~required ~~upon management’s evaluation of numerous factors, including a predictive analysis of the outcome of the current portfolio and prior credit loss experience, is deemed adequate~~ to ~~cover~~disclose ~~reasonably expected losses inherent in~~ the ~~outstanding~~activity ~~receivables.~~based ~~The~~information ~~Company~~that ~~charged~~was ~~off~~previously ~~uncollectible~~deferred ~~accounts~~by ~~when~~ASU ~~management estimates no possibility of collecting the related receivable~~No. ~~For customer purchases paid in advance, the Company records a liability until products are shipped~~2011-01. The ~~There~~adoption ~~was no outstanding unearned revenue from product sales as~~ of ~~March~~this ~~31,~~ASU ~~2011 or 2010. Property and Equipment Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation~~ is ~~provided~~not ~~using~~expected ~~the straight-line method over the useful lives of the related assets. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged~~ to ~~expenses~~have asa ~~incurred.~~material Asimpact ofon ~~March 31, 2011, the~~ Company’s ~~sole~~financial ~~asset (the Orpheum Theatre) had not been placed into service; therefore no depreciation is included for the year then ended~~statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs”. The ASU contains guidance on the application of the highest and best use and valuation premise concepts, the measurement of fair values of instruments classified in shareholders’ equity, the measurement of fair values of financial instruments that are managed within a portfolio, and the application of premiums and discounts in a fair value measurement. It also requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements, including information about the unobservable inputs used in fair value measurements within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the sensitivity of recurring fair value measurements within Level 3 to changes in unobservable inputs and the interrelationships between those inputs, and the categorization by level of the fair value hierarchy for items that are not measured at fair value but for which the fair value is required to be disclosed. These amendments are to be applied prospectively for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income”. The ASU increases the prominence of other comprehensive income in financial statements by requiring comprehensive income to be reported in either a single statement or in two consecutive statements which report both net income and other comprehensive income. It eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in equity. The ASU is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and requires retrospective application. The ASU does not change the components of other comprehensive income, the timing of items reclassified to net income, or the net income basis for income per share calculations. As this ASU is disclosure related only, the adoption of this ASU will not impact reported financial position or results of operations.

In September 2011, the FASB amended guidance pertaining to goodwill impairment testing. The amendments permit an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. An entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The guidance is effective April 1, 2012 with no significant impact expected on the Company’s financial statements.

In December 2011, the FASB issued guidance which relates to deconsolidation events. Under this amendment, when a parent (reporting entity) ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary that is in substance real estate as a result of the default on the subsidiary’s nonrecourse debt, the reporting entity should apply the guidance in Subtopic 360-20, Property, Plant and Equipment - Real Estate Sales, to determine whether it should derecognize the in substance real estate. This guidance is effective for the fiscal year ending March 31, 2014 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Also in December 2011, The FASB issued authoritative guidance to provide enhanced disclosures in the financial statements about offsetting and netting arrangements. The new guidance requires entities to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting agreement. This guidance was issued to facilitate comparison between financial statements prepared on a U.S. GAAP and IFRS reporting. The new guidance will be effective April 1, 2013 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Note 1. Organization and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Impairment of Long-lived Assets Long-lived tangible assets, including property, plant and equipment, and finite-lived intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the book value of the asset or asset groups may not be recoverable. The Company evaluates, regularly, whether events and circumstances have occurred that indicate possible impairment and relies on a number of factors, including operating results, business plans, economic projections, and anticipated future cash flows. The Company uses an estimate of the future undiscounted net cash flows of the related asset or asset group over the remaining life in measuring whether the assets are recoverable. Measurement of the amount of impairment, if any, is based upon the difference between the asset’s carrying value and estimated fair value. Cash and Cash Equivalents For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Line of Credit At March 31, 2010, the Company had a $25,000 variable interest rate credit line with a commercial bank, for which the balance outstanding as of March 31, 2010 was $24,690, which was part of the operations that were discontinued. As of March 31, 2011, the Company did not have any liability for that line of credit. Recently Issued Accounting Standards In June 2009, the FASB changed the accounting guidance for the consolidation of variable interest entities. The current quantitative-based risks and rewards calculation for determining which enterprise is the primary beneficiary of the variable interest entity will be replaced with an approach focused on identifying which enterprise has the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity. The new guidance became effective for the Company on April 1, 2010 with no impact on its financial statements. In June 2009, the FASB changed the accounting guidance for transfers of financial assets. The new guidance increases the information that a reporting entity provides in its financial reports about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its statement of financial condition, financial performance and cash flows; and a continuing interest in transferred financial assets. In addition, the guidance amends various concepts associated with the accounting for transfers and servicing of financial assets and extinguishments of liabilities including removing the concept of qualified special purpose entities. This new guidance was adopted by the Company on April 1, 2010 with no impact on its financial statements. In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-06, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (Topic 820) that requires new disclosures related to fair value measurements and clarifies existing disclosure requirements about the level of disaggregation, inputs and valuation techniques. Specifically, reporting entities now must disclose separately the amounts of significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 ~~fair~~Going value measurements and describe the reasons for the transfers. In addition, in the reconciliation for Level 3 fair value measurements, a reporting entity needs to use judgment in determining the appropriate classes of assets and liabilities for disclosure of fair value measurement, considering the level of disaggregated information required by other applicable U.S. GAAP guidance and should also provide disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for each class of assets and liabilities. The guidance was effective for financial statements issued for periods ending after December 15, 2009, except for disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements in reconciliation for Level 3 fair value measurements, which was effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this guidance affects only the disclosure requirements and had no impact on the Company’s statements of operations and condition.Concern

The Company has limited operating capital with limited revenue from operations. Realization of a major portion of the assets is dependent upon the Company’s ability to meet its future financing requirements, and the success of future operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustment that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

The Company is developing its operations from renovated theater property and from purchase/development of other commercial properties. The Company is planning on obtaining additional funds through equity financing. Should the Company fail to acquire these funds, expanding operations will be limited. Management has agreed to advance additional funds to cover the Company’s current operations. If the Company is unsuccessful in these efforts and cannot attain sufficient cash flows to permit profitable operations or if it cannot obtain a source of funding or investment, it may substantially curtail or terminate its operations.

Note 3

Investment in Unimproved Properties

On June 10, 2011, the Company purchased undeveloped property in Arkansas for $19,200 by issuing 80,000 shares of common stock.

On July 26, 2011, the Company issued 14,596,153 shares of common stock for the purchase of two undeveloped land parcels appraised at $3,795,000 located in California and Nevada.

On November14, 2011, the Company issued 1,066,667 shares of common stock for the purchase of ten (10) undeveloped land parcels in Hot Springs, Arkansas. Total purchase price, including closing costs was $164,878.

On December 13, 2011, the Company purchased approximately 22.5 acres of undeveloped land in Oklahoma for a total of $3,000,000. Payment consisted of a cash payment of $10,000 towards an outstanding mortgage, paid in January 2012, and issuance of 29,900,000 shares of common stock.

Note 4

Investment in Improved Properties

On June 28, 2010, the Company acquired 129 University Place, LLC, whose sole asset was the Orpheum Theatre. The property is being held pending the completion of renovation activity. The carrying value at March 31, 2012 and 2011 consists of the following:

	March 31, 2012		March 31, 2011

Acquisition Costs	$	6,172,360	$	6,172,360
Renovation Costs		242,701		124,575
Real Estate Commission		610,000		-
Prepaid Development Fees		944,498		-

Total	$	7,969,559	$	6,296,935

Note 5

Investment in Contracts

On February 21, 2012, the Company acquired two tax-credit consulting contracts from Morris Kahn & Associates, owned by our CEO, Morris Kahn. These contracts entitle the Company to collect fees totaling $960,000 over a period of 20 years. The Present Value, calculated based on the expected dates of receipt, indicates that at March 31, 2012, the contracts have a value of $555,502 based on a 6.4% rate of return.

Note 16 ~~Organization~~Demand and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Recently Issued Accounting Standards (Continued) In December 2010, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that modified Step 1 of the goodwill impairment test for reporting units with zero or negative carrying amounts. For those reporting units, an entity is required to perform Step 2 of the goodwill impairment test if it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists. In determining whether it is more likely than not that a goodwill impairment exists, an entity should consider whether there are any adverse qualitative factors indicating that an impairment may exist such as if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount. This new authoritative guidance is effective on April 1, 2011 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements. In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-02, which amends the guidance for evaluating whether the restructuring of a receivable by a creditor is a troubled debt restructuring (TDR). In evaluating whether a restructuring constitutes a TDR both for purposes of recording an impairment loss and for disclosure purposes, a creditor must separately conclude that both of the following exist: (a) the restructuring constitutes a concession; and (b) the debtor is experiencing financial difficulties. For public companies, the new guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after June 15, 2011, and applies retrospectively to restructurings occurring on or after the beginning of the annual period of adoption. However, an entity should apply prospectively changes in the method used to calculate impairment. At the same time a public entity adopts ASU 2011-02, it is required to disclose the activity based information that was previously deferred by ASU No. 2011-01. The adoption of this ASU is not expected to have a material impact on Company’s financial statements. In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs”. The ASU contains guidance on the application of the highest and best use and valuation premise concepts, the measurement of fair values of instruments classified in shareholders’ equity, the measurement of fair values of financial instruments that are managed within a portfolio, and the application of premiums and discounts in a fair value measurement. It also requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements, including information about the unobservable inputs used in fair value measurements within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy, the sensitivity of recurring fair value measurements within Level 3 to changes in unobservable inputs and the interrelationships between those inputs, and the categorization by level of the fair value hierarchy for items that are not measured at fair value but for which the fair value is required to be disclosed. These amendments are to be applied prospectively for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a significant effect on the Company’s financial statements. In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income”. The ASU increases the prominence of other comprehensive income in financial statements by requiring comprehensive income to be reported in either a single statement or in two consecutive statements which report both net income and other comprehensive income. It eliminates the option to report other comprehensive income and its components in the statement of changes in equity. The ASU is effective for periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and requires retrospective application. The ASU does not change the components of other comprehensive income, the timing of items reclassified to net income, or the net income basis for income per share calculations. As this ASU is disclosure related only, the adoption of this ASU will not impact reported financial position or results of operations. In September 2011, the FASB amended guidance pertaining to goodwill impairment testing. The amendments permit an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying amount as a basis for determining whether it is necessary to perform the two-step goodwill impairment test. An entity is not required to calculate the fair value of a reporting unit unless the entity determines that it is more likely than not that its fair value is less than its carrying amount. The guidance is effective January 1, 2012 with no significant impact expected on the Company’s financial statements.Note

The mortgage on the Orpheum property which bears an interest rate of 13% per annum accrued monthly based on a 360 day per year calculation. The principal is due on demand. The principal balance at March 31, 2012, was $2,698,360.

At the time of the Company’s acquisition the note had accrued interest of $33,130. Between June 28, 2010 and March 31, 2012, additional interest of $616,800 has been accrued, with a March 31, 2012 accrued interest balance of $649,930.

The demand note consists of debentures that are held by numerous individuals. In February 2011, some of the debenture holders filed a lawsuit against the owners of the Orpheum Theater prior to its transfer to 129 University Place and against 129 University Place demanding either payment or release of the property. Terms of the agreement require that we participate in an arbitration process first. We are currently working with legal counsel, lending sources, and the debenture holders through arbitration to provide for a quick settlement of their claims and satisfaction of their complaint.

Note 7

Preferred Stock

On August 22, 2007, the Company effected a one-for-three reverse stock split of its common stock, and authorized the issuance of a class of preferred stock (1,000,000 shares) of which 900,000 shares were issued. They are convertible to one share of common stock for each share of preferred. There are no stated dividend payments attributed at this time to those shares and they bear a par value of $0.001 each. On June 28, 2010, these shares were converted to common stock.

Also on June 28, 2010, the Company issued 42,260 shares of Class B Preferred Stock as part of its offer to purchase the Orpheum Theater. These shares had a par value of $2.00 per share and were convertible into 2000 shares of common stock (100 shares of post-reverse split shares). On December 31, 2010, the shares were converted into 4,226,000 shares of common stock.

On June 6, 2011, the Company issued 40,000 shares of its Preferred Stock as compensation to a consultant that was owed $200,000.

Note 8

Common Stock

The Company, at inception, issued 1,000 shares of common stock to two initial stockholders at approximately $1.00 per share for a total amount of $1,002.

On May 20, 2004, the Company combined with Back Channel Investments, Inc., in a reverse merger pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization. Back Channel acquired all of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company in exchange for 7,000,000 shares of Back Channel’s common stock. Prior to the combination, Back Channel had 1,000,000 shares of common stock outstanding which were forward split on the basis of three for one. The surviving entity was the Company. Upon completion of the reverse merger, the Company was re-capitalized to have 10,000,000 shares outstanding. In August 2007, these shares were converted to 3,333,332 shares in a reverse stock split.

During the year ended March 31, 2007, two shareholders sold 7,000 shares at a price of $.50 per share and contributed the proceeds to the Company.

On August 22, 2007, the Company effected a one-for-three reverse stock split of its common stock, and authorized the issuance of a class of preferred stock (1,000,000 shares) and to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 10,000,000 to 50,000,000. Directors and officers active at that time received 669,299 of these shares for services rendered.

~~Note~~On 1.March ~~Organization~~24, ~~and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued) Recently Issued Accounting Standards (Continued) In December 2011~~2008, the ~~FASB~~Company also issued ~~guidance~~125,000 ~~which~~shares ~~relates~~ to ~~deconsolidation~~Tyrus ~~events~~C. ~~Under~~Young ~~this amendment, when a parent~~ (~~reporting~~Chief ~~entity~~Financial Officer/Director) ~~ceases~~for toservices ~~have~~rendered. On aJune ~~controlling financial interest in a subsidiary that is in substance real estate as a result of the default on the subsidiary’s nonrecourse debt~~30, ~~the reporting entity should apply the guidance in Subtopic 360-20~~2010, ~~Property,~~Mr. ~~Plant~~Young ~~and~~was ~~Equipment~~issued -an ~~Real~~additional ~~Estate Sales~~50,000 ~~to determine whether it should derecognize the in substance real estate~~shares. These ~~This~~shares, ~~guidance~~pursuant isto ~~effective for~~ the ~~fiscal~~reverse ~~year~~split ~~ending~~described ~~December 31~~below, ~~2013~~totaled ~~and~~8,750 ~~is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements~~shares. In ~~December~~January 2011, ~~The~~he ~~FASB~~received issued authoritative guidance to provide enhanced disclosures in the financial statements about offsetting and netting arrangements. The new guidance requires entities to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an ~~agreement~~additional similar to a master netting agreement. This guidance was issued to facilitate comparison between financial statements prepared on a U.S. GAAP and IFRS reporting. The new guidance will be effective January 150,000 ~~2013~~post-split ~~and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements~~shares.

~~Note~~On 2.December ~~Going~~10, ~~Concern~~2010, ~~The Company has limited operating capital~~ with ~~limited~~15,000,000 ~~revenue~~shares ~~from~~issued ~~operations. Realization of a major portion of the assets is dependent upon the Company’s ability to meet its future financing requirements,~~ and ~~the~~outstanding ~~success of future operations. These factors raise substantial doubt about~~ the Company’s ~~ability~~issued ~~to continue as~~ a ~~going~~reverse ~~concern.~~stock ~~The~~split ~~financial~~at ~~statements~~a dorate ~~not include any adjustment that might result from the outcome~~ of ~~this~~20 uncertainty. The Company is developing its operations from renovated theater property and from purchase/development of other commercial properties. The Company is planning on obtaining additional funds through equity financing. Should the Company fail to ~~acquire these funds~~1, ~~expanding~~thereby ~~operations~~reducing ~~will be limited. Management has agreed to advance additional funds to cover~~ the ~~Company’s~~outstanding ~~current~~total ~~operations.~~shares ~~If the Company is unsuccessful in these efforts and cannot attain sufficient cash flows~~ to ~~permit profitable operations or if it cannot obtain a source of funding or investment~~750, ~~it may substantially curtail or terminate its operations~~000.

~~Note3.~~On ~~Property~~December ~~and~~31, ~~Equipment~~2010, ~~Property~~Rampant ~~and~~Leon ~~equipment~~Financial isCorporation, ~~carried~~an atentity ~~cost~~affiliated ~~and~~with ~~summarized~~the asCompany ~~follows~~through ascommon management, converted its 42,260 shares of ~~March~~Preferred 31Class B shares into 4,226,000 ~~2011:~~shares of common stock.

		Cost				Accumulated Depreciation				Net
Orpheum Theatre - Construction in Progress		$	6,296,935			$	-			$	6,296,935

At the time of the acquisition of 129 University Place, LLC, the management of the Company was authorized to issue shares to existing and former officers, directors and staff to bring the outstanding total shares to 15,000,000 shares. Post reverse stock split shares of 111,251 shares were issued on January 27, 2011.

~~Property~~On ~~and~~January ~~equipment~~27, ~~held as of March 31~~2011, ~~2010 were relinquished as part of~~ the Company’s ~~sale~~issued ~~of discontinued operations. For the statements presented current depreciation expense is $ -0-~~ 1,219,030 asshares ~~none~~to ofvarious ~~the~~individuals ~~assets~~who ~~acquired~~had ~~have~~assisted ~~been~~or ~~put~~consulted ~~into service as of March 31, 2011. Depreciation expense for~~ the ~~year~~Company ~~ended~~in ~~March~~various ~~31,~~ways ~~2010~~over ~~totaled $12,664, all of which pertained to property and equipment associated with~~ the ~~Company’s~~prior ~~discontinued~~six ~~operations~~months.

On February 15, 2011, the Company issued 57,250 shares to three unrelated parties for debt that was owed by a related party partially owned by the Company’s Chairman, Andrew Reid. This was in return for advances made to the Company by the related party.

On March 9, 2011, the Company issued 137,561 shares to the early investors in the Orpheum Theater (pre-acquisition) and reduced the Stock to Be Issued that was established at the time of the purchase by $35,766.

Also on March 9, 2011, the Company issued 1,500 shares to an unrelated party for consulting services.

On March 18, 2011, the Company issued 70,000 shares to unrelated parties for consulting services.

On July 8, 2011, the Company issued 11,045,250 shares of stock to consultants and recipients of common stock in January 2011, as an anti-dilution measure after increasing authorized shares of common stock from 50 million shares to 500 million.

Also on July 8, 2011, the Company issued 38,250,000 shares of stock as an anti-dilution measure to the companies that had converted their shares of preferred stock in January 2011.

On July 21, 2011, the Company issued 450,000 shares to consultants and recipients of common stock in March 2011, also as an anti-dilution measure.

On July 26, 2011, the Company issued 14,596,153 shares of stock to purchase properties in California and Nevada for the appraised value of $3,795,000.

On August 3, 2011, the Company issued 3,185,595 shares to a company that had purchased shares in 2010, again as an anti-dilution measure.

On August 16, 2011, the Company issued 800,000 shares to an investor in the Orpheum Theater prior to the Company’s purchase of the property. The issuance reduced the amount in Stock To Be Issued by $125,000.

On September 21, 2011, the Company issued 80,000 shares as payment for the June 6, 2011, acquisition of the property in Arkansas valued at $19,200.

On October 4, 2011, the Company issued 25,531,915 shares as a down payment for a 50% share in a commercial property in Baja, Mexico. The purchase was concluded on January 14, 2012, at which time an additional 16,662,690 shares were issued.

~~Note~~On 4.November Demand Note Payable The mortgage on the Orpheum property which bears an interest rate of 13% per annum accrued monthly based on a 360 day per year calculation. The principal is due on demand. The principal balance at March 315, 2011, ~~was $2,698,360. At~~ the ~~time of the~~ Company’s ~~acquisition~~issued ~~the note had accrued interest of $33~~805,~~130.~~000 ~~Between~~shares ~~June~~to 28, 2010 and March 31, 2011, additional interest of $266,013 has been accrued, which results in an accrued interest balance of $299,143 as of March 31, 2011. The demand note consists of debentures that are held by numerous individuals. In February, 2011, some of the debenture holders filed a ~~lawsuit~~consultant ~~against~~for ~~the~~services ~~owners~~rendered ~~of the Orpheum Theater prior to its transfer to 129 University Place~~ and against 129 University Place demanding either payment or release of the property. Terms of the agreement require that we participate in an arbitration process first. We are currently working with legal counsel, lending sources, and the debenture holders to ~~provide~~be ~~for~~rendered per a ~~quick~~service ~~settlement of their claims and satisfaction of their complaint~~contract.

~~Note 5. Preferred Stock~~ On ~~August~~November 229, ~~2007~~2011, the Company ~~effected~~issued ~~a one-for-three reverse stock split of its common stock, and authorized the issuance of a class of preferred stock (~~1,~~000~~066,~~000~~667 shares) ~~of which 900,000 shares were issued. They are convertible~~ to 1purchase ~~share~~ten ofvacant ~~common~~residential ~~stock~~lots ~~for~~in ~~each~~Hot ~~share of preferred. There are no stated dividend payments attributed at this time to those shares and they bear a par value of $ .001 each. On June 28~~Springs, ~~2010, these shares were converted to common stock~~Arkansas. The ~~Also on June 28, 2010, the Company issued 42,260 shares of Class B Preferred Stock as part of its offer to~~ purchase ~~the~~price ~~Orpheum Theater. These shares had a par value of $2.00 per share~~ and ~~were~~closing ~~convertible~~costs ~~into~~totaled 2$164,~~000 shares of common stock~~878. ~~On December 31, 2010, the shares were converted into 4,226,000 shares of common stock.~~

~~Note 6. Common Stock The Company, at inception, issued 1,000 shares of common stock to two initial stockholders at approximately $1.00 per share for a total amount of $1,002.~~ On ~~May~~December 2014, ~~2004~~2011, the Company ~~combined~~issued ~~with Back Channel Investments~~4, ~~Inc. (“Back Channel”) in a reverse merger pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Reorganization. Back Channel acquired all of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company in exchange for 7~~450,000~~,000~~ shares ~~of Back Channel’s common stock. Prior~~ to ~~the combination, Back Channel had 1,000,000 shares of common stock outstanding which were forward split on the basis of~~ three ~~for one. The surviving entity is Orpheum Property, Inc. Upon completion~~ of the ~~agreement,~~parties ~~the~~owed ~~combined~~stock ~~Company~~pursuant ~~essentially re-capitalized~~ to ~~have 10,000,000 shares outstanding. In August, 2007, these shares were converted to 3,333,332 shares in a reverse stock split. The Company has filed a registration statement with~~ the ~~Securities~~purchase ~~and Exchange Commission on Form SB-2. The offering includes 3,000,000 shares~~ of ~~common stock of Pacific Land & Coffee Corporation, which are offered by~~ the ~~selling stockholders. Certain of the selling stockholders which were promoters or affiliates of~~ Orpheum ~~Property, Inc~~Theater. This ~~are~~reduced ~~deemed underwriters. During~~ the ~~year~~Stock ~~ended~~To ~~March~~Be ~~31,~~Issued ~~2007,~~by ~~two shareholders sold 7,000 shares at a price of~~ $.50 per share and contributed the proceeds to the Company. On August 22, 2007, the Company effected a one-for-three reverse stock split of its common stock, and authorized the issuance of a class of preferred stock (1,~~000~~075,000 ~~shares) and to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 10,000,000 to 50,000,000~~. ~~Directors and officers active at that time received 669,299 of these shares for services rendered.~~

On December 19, 2011, the Company issued 10,547,969 shares to the remaining parties owed stock pursuant to the purchase of the Orpheum Theater. This represented the balance of all amounts due to Orpheum Theater investors who were due stock due to that purchase.

On January 18, 2012, the Company issued 700,000 shares of common stock to an investor for $50,000 cash.

On January 19, 2012, the Company issued 14,134,615 shares of common stock as payment of commissions to a related company owned in part by the Company’s Chairman, Andrew Reid, as compensation for commissions earned on several of the Company’s asset purchases.

On January 23, 2012, the Company issued 416,538 shares of common stock to its Corporate Secretary as payment for services rendered during the 2012 fiscal year.

On January 27, 2012, the Company issued 1,000,000 shares of common stock as recognition to a newly appointed member of its Board of Directors.

On March 5, 2012, the Company issued 28,000,000 shares of common stock that had been set aside to complete the purchase of the Oklahoma property. An additional 1,900,000 shares of common stock remain to be issued and are classed in Stock to Be Issued.

Note 9

Stock To Be Issued

At March 31, 2012, the Company had the following commitments to issue Common Stock:

Shares valued at $190,000 are due to EAH, LLC, for funds provided on the purchase of the Oklahoma property.

Shares valued at $60,000 are due to our CEO, Morris Kahn as payment due for services per his consulting contract for his services as the Company’s CEO.

For the purchase of certain tax-credit consulting contracts as well as for the prepayment of tax-credit consulting services associated with the Orpheum Theatre from Morris Kahn & Associates, the Company has an obligation to issue 15,000,000 shares of stock valued at $1,500,000.

Shares valued at $2,000 are due to a cash investor.

Note 10

Operating Leases

The Company leases their office space under an operating lease. As of March 31, 2012, the Company is committed to the following minimum rentals:

2013	$	14,484
2014		8,449

Total	$	22,933

Rent expense totaled $28,995 and $ -0- at March 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

Note 6.11 ~~Common~~Income Stock (Continued) On March 24, 2008, the Company also issued 125,000 shares to Tyrus C Young (Chief Financial Officer/Director) for services rendered. On June 30, 2010, Mr. Young was issued an additional 50,000 shares. These shares, pursuant to the reverse split described below, totaled 8,750 shares. In January, 2011, he received an additional 50,000 post-split shares. On December 10, 2010, with 15,000,000 shares issued and outstanding the Company issued a reverse stock split at a rate of 20 to 1, thereby reducing the outstanding total shares to 750,000. The financial statements have been retroactively revised for this change in its capital structure. On December 31, 2010, Rampant Leon converted its 42,260 shares of Preferred Class B shares into 4,226,000 shares of common stock. At the time of the acquisition of 129 University, the management of Orpheum was authorized to issue shares to existing and former officers, directors and staff to bring the outstanding total shares to 15,000,000 shares. Post reverse stock split shares of 111,251 shares were issued on January 27, 2011. On January 27, 2011, the Company issued 1,219,030 shares to various individuals who had assisted or consulted the Company in various ways over the prior six months. On February 15, 2011 the Company issued 57,250 shares to three unrelated parties for debt that was owed by a related party partially owned by the Company’s Chairman, Andrew Reid. This was in return for advances made to the Company by the related party. On March 9, 2011, the Company issued 137,561 shares to the early investors in the Orpheum Theater (pre-acquisition) and reduced the Stock Payable that was established at the time of the purchase by $35,766. Also on March 9, 2011, the Company issued 1,500 shares to an unrelated party for consulting services. On March 18, 2011, the Company issued 70,000 shares to unrelated parties for consulting services.Taxes

~~Note 7. Income Taxes~~ The provision for income taxes for ~~2011~~the ~~and~~years ~~2010~~ended ~~consists~~March of31, ~~the~~2012 ~~following~~and ~~for~~2011, ~~the~~consists ~~years~~of ~~ended~~the ~~March 31st~~following:

	2011		2010
	2012		2011
Federal
Current	$	--	$	--
Deferred		--		--
State
Current		--		--
Deferred		--		--
Total Provision (Benefit)	$	--	$	--

Reconciliation between income taxes at the combined federal and state statutory rate (40.4%) and the actual income tax provision for continuing operations follows:

	2011			2010
Expected Provision/(Benefit)	$	(576,821	)	$	(692,807	)
Increase in Valuation Allowance		576,821			692,807
Provision for Income Taxes	$	--		$	--

The following is a summary of deferred tax balances as of March 31, 2012 and 2011 with an assumed combined federal and state tax rate of 40.4%:

	2012			2011
Deferred Tax Asset:
Net Operating Loss Carryforwards	$	1,915,508		$	1,338,687

Gross Deferred Tax Asset		1,915,508			1,338,687
Less: Valuation allowance		(1,915,508	)		(1,338,687	)
Net Deferred Tax Asset		-0-			-0-
Deferred Tax Liabilities		-0-			-0-
Net Deferred Tax Asset (Liability)	$	-0-		$	-0-

The Company has net operating losses totaling $4,741,355, which expire through March 31, 2032.

When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. The Company did not identify any material uncertain tax positions on returns that have been filed or that will be filed. The Company has not had operations and is carrying a large net operating loss carryforward, as described above. Since it is not thought that this net operating loss carryforward will ever produce a tax benefit, even if examined by taxing authorities and disallowed entirely, there would be no effect on the financial statements.

~~Note~~The 7.Company ~~Income~~has ~~Taxes~~filed ~~(Continued)~~income ~~The~~tax ~~provisions~~returns ~~for~~in ~~income~~the ~~taxes~~U.S. All ~~differs~~years ~~from~~prior ~~that~~to ~~computed~~2009 are closed by ~~applying~~expiration ~~Federal~~of ~~and~~the ~~state~~statute ~~statutory~~of ~~rates~~limitations. The toyears ~~loss~~ended ~~before~~March ~~income~~31, ~~tax~~2009, ~~expense~~2010, asand ~~indicated~~2011 inare ~~the~~open ~~following~~for ~~analysis:~~examination.

	2011			2010
Expected Benefit at statutory rates	$	(692,807	)	$	(65,993	)
Other		-			96
Increase in Valuation Allowance		692,807			65,897
Provision for Income Taxes	$	-		$	-

The Company’s policy is to recognize potential interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits within income tax expenses. For the year ended March 31, 2012 and 2011, we did not recognize any interest or penalties, nor did we have any interest or penalties accrued as of March 31, 2012 and 2011 relating to unrecognized benefits.

~~Significant~~Note ~~components~~12 ofRelated ~~the~~Party ~~Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities, based on an assumed combined Federal and state tax rate of 40.4%, as of March 31, 2011 and 2010, are as follows:~~Transactions

	2011			2010
Deferred Tax Asset
Net Operating Loss Carryforwads	$	1,338,687		$	645,880
Gross Deferred Tax Asset		1,338,687			645,880
Less: Valuation Allowance		(1,338,687	)		(645,880	)
Net Deferred Tax Asset		-			-
Deferred Tax Liabilities		-			-
Net Deferred Tax Asset (Liability)	$	-		$	-

On June 30, 2010, the two existing coffee related subsidiaries were sold to entities controlled by two former officers and directors. The purchase price of $110,000 was paid by reducing the amounts due to one of these individuals by $45,000 and recording a short term receivable of $55,000. The Company was able to recover $30,000 of this receivable and for the year ended March 31, 2011, recognized a bad debt expense for the remaining $25,000 owed.

~~The Company has net operating losses totaling $ 3~~Also,~~313,581,~~ ~~which~~during ~~expire through March 31~~June, ~~2031. When tax returns are filed~~2010, ~~it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by~~ the ~~taxing~~same ~~authorities,~~former ~~while~~director ~~others~~paid ~~are~~our ~~subject~~former toaudit ~~uncertainty~~firm ~~about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. The benefit of~~ a ~~tax~~total position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of ~~appeals or litigation processes~~$45,000 iffor ~~any.~~bills Weincurred did not identify any material uncertain tax position of the Company on returns that have been filed or that will be filed. The Company has not had operations and is carrying a large net operating loss carryforward, as disclosed above. Since it is not thought that this net operating loss carryforward will ever produce a tax benefit, even if examined by ~~taxing authorities and disallowed entirely, there would be no effect on~~ the ~~financial statements. The~~ Company ~~has~~over ~~filed income tax returns in~~ the ~~United States. All years~~ prior tofiscal 2007 are closed by expiration of the statute of limitations. The years ended March 31, 2007, 2008, and 2009 are open for examination. The Company’s policy is to recognize potential interest and penalties accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits within income tax expenses. For the year ~~ended March 31, 2011 and 2010, we did not recognize any interest or penalties, nor did we have any interest or penalties accrued as of March 31, 2011 and 2010 relating to unrecognized benefits~~.

Between June 28, 2010 and March 31, 2012, our majority shareholder has advanced a total of $503,805 to the Company for renovation costs to the Orpheum Theater and for operating costs.

As discussed in Note 8, on January 19, 2012, the Company issued 14,134,615 shares of common stock as payment to a related company owned in part by the Company’s Chairman, Andrew Reid, as compensation for commissions earned on several of the Company’s asset purchases.

On February 21, 2012, the Company purchased two tax credit consulting contracts from its CEO’s company, Morris Kahn & Associates. These contracts were recorded at their estimated fair value of $555,502. Cash inflows associated with the contracts are expected to begin in late 2012, and continue through 2032. In addition, the Company prepaid the estimated tax credit consulting fees pertaining to the contract it had with Morris Kahn & Associates for the Orpheum Theatre project. In exchange, Mr. Kahn agreed to accept 15,000,000 shares of the Company’s common stock valued at approximately $1.5 million.

Note 13

Significant Concentration of Credit Risk

The Company has a significant concentration of activities currently in commercial real estate primarily in the City of New Orleans. Any natural disasters or acts of vandalism or terrorism could prove detrimental to the holdings of the Company. During the year ended March 31, 2012, the Company has begun to diversify its geographic locations to other areas of the country.

Note 14

Discontinued Operations

In accordance with ASC 205-20, the Company has classified all results from operations of its former businesses of coffee roasting and research operations into discontinued operations line items within the Company’s statements of operations and statements of cash flow.

Net Loss from discontinued operations for the years ended March 31, 2012 and 2011 consisted of the following:

Note 8. Related Party Transactions On June 30, 2010, the two existing coffee related subsidiaries were sold to entities controlled by two former officers and directors. The purchase price of $110,000 was paid by reducing the amounts due to one of these individuals by $55,000 and recording a short term receivable of $55,000. The Company was able to recover $30,000 of this receivable and as of March 31, 2011, recognized a bad debt expense for the remaining $25,000 owed, which is included in the loss on sale of discontinued operations presented within the statement of operations. Also, during June, 2010, the same former director paid our former audit firm a total of $45,000 for bills incurred by the Company over the prior fiscal year. Between June 28, 2010 and March 31, 2011, our majority shareholder has advanced a total of $184,043 to the Company for renovation costs to the Orpheum Theater and for operating costs. The majority shareholder agreed to recognize these advances as additional contributed capital to the Company as of March 31, 2011.

	2012		2011
Revenues	$	--	$	81,067
Operating expenses		--		(74,155	)
Interest Expense		--		(799	)

Note 9. Significant Concentration of Credit Risk The Company’s concentration of activities is currently in the City of New Orleans. As the major asset of the Company as of March 31, 2011, is a single location, any natural disasters or acts of vandalism or terrorism could prove detrimental to the holdings of the Company. However, see subsequent events which lessen the risk.

Net Profit (Loss) from Discontinued Operations		--		6,113
Net Loss to Non-Controlling Interest		--		--

Net Loss from Discontinued Operations attributable to Orpheum Property, Inc.	$	--	$	6,113

Note ~~10.~~15 ~~Discontinued~~Subsequent Operations In accordance with ASC 205-20, the Company has classified all results from operations of its former businesses of coffee roasting and research operations into discontinued operations line items within the Company’s statements of operations and statements of cash flow. Net Loss from discontinued operations for the years ended March 31, 2011 and 2010 consisted of the following:Events

	2011			2010
Revenues	$	81,067		$	408,496
Operating Expenses		(74,155	)		(495,241	)
Interest Expense		(799	)		(5,225	)
Net Profit (Loss) from Discontinued Operations		6,113			(91,970	)
Net Loss to Non-controlling Interest		-			5,251
Net Loss from Discontinued Operations attributable
to Orpheum Property, Inc.	$	6,113		$	(86,719	)

In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 855, Subsequent Events, the Company evaluates events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date for potential recognition in the financial statements. The effects of all subsequent events that provide additional evidence of conditions that existed at the balance sheet date are recognized in the financial statements as of March 31, 2012. In preparing these financial statements, the Company evaluated the events and transactions that occurred through the date these financial statements were issued. The Company determined that the following event required disclosure:

Subsequent to March 31, 2012, the Company acquired a commercial property from its CEO, Morris Kahn, through the issuance of 20,000,000 shares of common stock and the assumption of $1,200,000 of mortgage debt.

Note 11. Subsequent Events In accordance with FASB ASC Topic 855, Subsequent Events, the Company evaluates events and transactions that occur after the balance sheet date for potential recognition in the financial statements. The effects of all subsequent events that provide additional evidence of conditions that existed at the balance sheet date are recognized in the financial statements as of March 31, 2011. In preparing these financial statements, the Company evaluated the events and transactions that occurred through the date these financial statements were issued. The Company determined that the following events required disclosure: On June 10, 2011, the Company acquired three parcels of vacant land valued at $20,000 through a stock issuance. On July 26, 2011, the Company acquired vacant land in California (42.9 acres) and another parcel in Nevada (5.48 acres) appraised at $3,795,000. The Company paid through the issuance of common stock. On November 14, 2011, the Company acquired 10 vacant residential lots in Hot Springs Village, Arkansas, ($160,000), in return for common stock. On December 13, 2011, the Company acquired approximately 22.5 acres of unimproved land for $3,000,000, in exchange for a combination of cash, mortgage assumption and common stock. On December 29, 2011, the Company acquired a 50% stake in a venture in Baja, Mexico for $6,329,190. The coastal property contains stones along the beach that will be removed and sold, generally for decorative purposes. On February 21, 2012, the Company acquired a commercial building from our CEO, Morris Kahn for $3,200,000. The Company issued common stock and assumed the mortgage on the property. Also on February 21, 2012, we acquired the open contracts of Morris Kahn & Associates for $1,500,000 in common stock.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

~~Change~~There ofare ~~Auditors~~no disagreements with our accountant on accounting and financial disclosure.

By mutual agreement the Company and its former audit firm, Mantyla McReynolds decided to terminate our professional relationship citing communication and fee issues. Effective with our September 30, 2010, interim report, we used the firm of M & K CPAs PLCC, however, communication issues which resulted in delays led us to change to LaPorte CPAs to complete the audit.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)). Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to enable us to accurately record, process, summarize and report certain information required to be included in the Company’s periodic SEC filings within the required time periods, and to accumulate and communicate to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION.

~~Not Applicable.~~None

2423

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, ~~PROMOTERS~~ AND ~~CONTROL~~CORPORATE ~~PERSONS; COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 16(a) OF THE EXCHANGE ACT.~~GOVERNANCE

Directors and Executive Officers

The members of the Board of Directors of Orpheum Property, Inc. serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders, or until their successors have been elected. The officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. The following are the current directors and executive officers of Orpheum Property, Inc. ~~They devote substantial time to Orpheum Property, Inc.~~

Andrew V. Reid Board Chairman Bruce Gwyn Director Whitney O. Cluff Director Morris Kahn Chief Executive Officer Tyrus C. Young Chief Financial Officer and Director

~~Tyrus~~Morris ~~C. Young Chief Financial Officer and Director~~Kahn

Morris Kahn, 5455, has managed State and Federal tax incentive projects for real estate development companies and businesses since 1982.

Tyrus C. Young, 54, formerly owned and operated a Certified Public Accounting firm specializing in audits of companies in regulated industries and currently heads business management firms in Atlanta, GA and Honolulu, HI.

Tyrus C. Young, 55, formerly owned and operated a Certified Public Accounting firm specializing in audits of companies in regulated industries and currently heads business management firms in Atlanta, GA and Honolulu, HI.

Andrew V. Reid

Andrew V. Reid has served as Chairman since April 2011. From August 2010 to April 2011, he served as the Company’s CEO.

Mr. Reid has more than 20 years of corporate finance and management experience. In 2006, Mr. Reid started NOLA Commercial Finance Inc., a commercial finance company. During the past four years, he has focused on helping small regional oil and gas companies with debt and equity funding. He has helped fund in excess of $50 million for various types of income producing properties.

Mr. Reid also serves as Chairman and CEO of Treaty Energy Corporation, an international oil and gas company with oil and gas resources in Kansas, Texas, Louisiana, and Belize.

In 2002, Mr. Reid’s registration as a broker was revoked by the National Association of Securities Dealers (“NASD”, now the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority). Mr. Reid denied and continues to deny the allegations presented by the NASD; however, he did not challenge the revocation since he desired to voluntarily leave the securities industry for other reasons.

Bruce Gwyn

Mr. Gwyn also serves as co-CEO of Treaty Energy Corporation, an international oil and gas company with oil and gas resources in Kansas, Texas, Louisiana, and Belize.

Whitney O. Cluff

Mr. Cluff has served as a Director since January 2012. He also serves as Vice President with Coldwell Banker Commercial, Salt Lake City, Utah, with over thirty years of experience in the commercial real estate and financial business, working with land development, mixed use development, retail tenant and developer representation and the retail shopping center business.

Mr. Cluff has extewnsive back ground in commercial real estate, and is also involved in community service and planning. He balances strong analytical, planning, and organization abilities with effective negotiation skills.

Code of Ethics

Orpheum Property, Inc. has not adopted a code of ethics which applies to the chief executive officer, or principal financial and accounting officer, because of our level of operations at this time.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

~~Orpheum Property, Inc. does not have an audit committee.~~ The entire board of directors of the Company functions as the audit committee. ~~Orpheum~~The ~~Property,~~Company’s ~~Inc.~~board ~~does not have a financial expert on its audit committee, because~~ of ~~the~~directors ~~difficulty~~has ~~encountered~~determined bythat ~~all~~Tyrus ~~small~~C. ~~public~~Young ~~companies~~is inan ~~obtaining~~audit ~~outside~~committee ~~board~~financial ~~members~~expert. WeMr. ~~cannot~~Young ~~predict~~is ~~when,~~not ifindependent ~~ever,~~with werespect ~~will be able~~ to ~~attract a person to~~ the ~~board~~Company ofsince ~~directors~~he ~~who~~serves isas aour ~~financial expert~~CFO.

2524

~~ITEM~~Section ~~11. EXECUTIVE~~16(a) ~~COMPENSATION~~Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

The Company has determined that our directors and officers have not filed the forms under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. This failure was due to lack of knowledge of these requirements and a lock of administrative resources. Additional administrative resources are being made available to the Company in order to file the required reports to bring these individuals into compliance.

Item 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth the cash and all other compensation of Orpheum Property, Inc.'s executive officers and directors during each of the last three fiscal years. The remuneration described in the table includes the cost to Orpheum Property, Inc. of any benefits which may be furnished to the named executive officers, including premiums for health insurance and other benefits provided to such individual that are extended in connection with the conduct of Orpheum Property, Inc.'s business. The executive officers named below did not receive any manner of compensation in the years set forth below.

Until we obtain additional funding, most Company officers and directors are devoting the majority of their time to other employment and are serving without compensation. ~~Following funding we expect that the aggregate monthly compensation for management will be under $250,000.~~ Morris Kahn began receiving compensation, ~~but~~as ~~not~~of ~~until after~~ April 1, 2011. The only other officer/director to receive any compensation was Tyrus C. Young though all payments were made to his management corporations.

Summary Compensation Table

	ANNUALCOMPENSATION					LONG TERM COMPENSATION
						Other Annual Compensation
Name and						Other Annual					Awards		Payouts		All
						Restricted		Securities			Awards
Principal Position						Compensation
Name and						Stock		Underlying			LTIP		Payouts
						Restricted		Securities			LTIP
Principal Position	Year	Salary		Bonus		Awards ($)		Options SARs (#)			Payouts ($)		Compensation
						Stock		Underlying
Tyrus C. Young	2011		13,353		0		0		0			0		0
	Year	Salary		Bonus		Awards ($)		Options SARs(#)		Payouts($)			Compensation
Chief Financial Officer	2010		27,002		0		0		0			0		0
Morris Kahn	2012		120,000		0		0		0			0		0		0
Director	2009		32,375		0		0		0			0		0
Chief Executive Officer	2011		0		0		0		0			0		0		0
	2010		0		0		0		0			0		0	0
Tyrus C. Young	2012		0		0		0		0			0		0		0
Chief Financial Officer	2011		13,353		0		0		0			0		0		0
Director	2010		27,002		0		0		0			0		0		0

Back Channel Investments, which later acquired Pacific Land & Coffee Corporation, by resolution of its Board of Directors and stockholders, adopted a 1994 Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") on April 20, 1994. The Plan enables the Company to offer an incentive based compensation system to employees, officers and directors and to employees of companies who do business with the Company.

In the discretion of a committee comprised of non-employee directors (the "Committee"), directors, officers, and key employees or employees of companies with which we do business become participants in the Plan upon receiving grants in the form of stock options or restricted stock. A total of 2,000,000 shares are authorized for issuance under the Plan, of which no shares are issued. The Company may increase the number of shares authorized for issuance under the Plan or may make other material modifications to the Plan without shareholder approval. However, no amendment may change the existing rights of any option holder.

Any shares which are subject to an award but are not used because the terms and conditions of the award are not met, or any shares which are used by participants to pay all or part of the purchase price of any option may again be used for awards under the Plan. However, shares with respect to which a stock appreciation right has been exercised may not again be made subject to an award.

Stock options may be granted as non-qualified stock options or incentive stock options, but incentive stock options may not be granted at a price less than 100% of the fair market value of the stock as of the date of grant (110% as to any 10% shareholder at the time of grant); non-qualified stock options may not be granted at a price less than 85% of fair market value of the stock as of the date of grant. Restricted stock may not be granted under the Plan in connection with incentive stock options.

Stock options may be exercised during a period of time fixed by the Committee except that no stock option may be exercised more than ten years after the date of grant or three years after death or disability, whichever is later. In the discretion of the Committee, payment of the purchase price for the shares of stock acquired through the exercise of a stock option may be made in cash, shares of Common Stock or by delivery or recourse promissory notes or a combination of notes, cash and shares of the Company's common stock or a combination thereof. Incentive stock options may only be issued to directors, officers and employees.

Stock options may be granted under the Plan may include the right to acquire an Accelerated Ownership Non-Qualified Stock Option ("AO"). If an option grant contains the AO feature and if a participant pays all or part of the purchase price of the option with shares of common stock, then upon exercise of the option the participant is granted an AO to purchase, at the fair market value as of the date of the AO grant, the number of shares of common stock equal to the sum of the number of whole shares used by the participant in payment of the purchase price and the number of whole shares, if any, withheld as payment for withholding taxes. An AO may be exercised between the date of grant and the date of expiration, which will be the same as the date of expiration of the option to which the AO is related.

Stock appreciation rights and/or restricted stock may be granted in conjunction with, or may be unrelated to stock options. A stock appreciation right entitles a participant to receive a payment, in cash or common stock or a combination thereof, in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the stock at the time of exercise over the fair market value as of the date of grant. Stock appreciation rights may be exercised during a period of time fixed by the Committee not to exceed ten years after the date of grant or three years after death or disability, whichever is later. Restricted stock requires the recipient to continue in service as an officer, director, employee or consultant for a fixed period of time for ownership of the shares to vest. If restricted shares or stock appreciation rights are issued in tandem with options, the restricted stock or stock appreciation right is canceled upon exercise of the option and the option will likewise terminate upon vesting of the restricted shares.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT

The following table sets forth information relating to the beneficial ownership of Company common stock as of March 31, ~~2011~~2012 by (i) each person known by Orpheum Property, Inc. to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the outstanding shares of common stock and (ii) each of Orpheum Property, Inc.'s directors and executive officers. Unless otherwise noted below, Orpheum Property, Inc. believes that all persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock beneficially owned by them. For purposes hereof, a person is deemed to be the beneficial owner of securities that can be acquired by such person within 60 days from the date hereof upon the exercise of warrants or options or the conversion of convertible securities. Each beneficial owner's percentage ownership is determined by assuming that any warrants, options or convertible securities that are held by such person (but not those held by any other person) and which are exercisable within 60 days from the date hereof, have been exercised.

Name and Address	Preferred Stock		Percentage		Common Stock		Percentage
Andrew V. Reid, Chairman and CEO (9/24/10-03/31/11)		--		--		1,416,667		21.93	%
John L. Hales, CEO (through 9/24/10)		--		--		34,176		.53	%
Tyrus C. Young, CFO and Director		--		--		58,750		.91	%
Bruce Gwyn, Director		--		--		17,560		.27	%
Michael A. Mulshine, Corp Secretary		--		--		350,000		5.42	%
All officers and directors as a group (5 persons)		--		--		1,877,153		29.05	%
BRW Consulting Group, LLC		--		--		1,416,666		21.93	%
Edgewater River Investments, LLC		--		--		1,416,667		21.93	%
Tahoe Investments		--		--		343,987		5.32	%

Name and Address			Preferred Stock	Percentage

Andrew V. Reid, Chairman and CEO	--	--	14,166,670	7.95	%
Morris Kahn, CEO	--	--	200,000	0.11	%
Tyrus C. Young, CFO/Director	--	--	509,000	0.28	%
Bruce Gwyn, Director	--	--	3,198,845	1.80	%
Whitney O. Cluff, Director	--	--	1,250,000	0.70	%
Michael Mulshine, Corp Secretary	--	--	3,916,538	2.20	%
All officers and directors as a group (6 persons)	--	--	23,241,053	13.04	%
BRW Consulting Group, LLC	--	--	14,166,660	7.95	%
Edgewater River Investments, LLC	--	--	14,166,670	7.95	%
Rampant Leon Financial Corp.	--	--	14,134,615	7.93	%

Except as otherwise noted, shares are owned beneficially and of record, and such record shareholder has sole voting, investment, and dispositive power.

Shares owned by Andrew V. Reid are held of record by NOLA Commercial Finance Inc., which is controlled by him.

Shares owned by Bruce Gwyn are held of record by Level III Trading Partners, aL.P. An ~~corporation~~investment advisory firm controlled by Mr. Gwyn is the general partner of Level III Trading Partners, L.P.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

~~Back~~Related Channel Investments, Inc. was organized as a Delaware corporation on April 21, 1994 to seek out an advantageous acquisition. On May 20, 2003, Back Channel Investments, Inc. acquired all of the capital stock of Orpheum Property, Inc., a Hawaii corporation, in exchange for 7,000,000 shares of newly issued common stock of Back Channel Investments, Inc. Prior to the exchange Back Channel Investments, Inc. had 3,000,000 shares outstanding (after giving effect to a three-for-one forward stock split). As a result, there are 10,000,000 shares outstanding. In August, 2007, these shares were converted to 3,333,332 shares in a reverse stock split.Transactions

~~Back~~On ~~Channel~~February ~~Investments~~21, ~~Inc.~~2012, ~~subsequently~~the ~~changed~~Company ~~its~~acquired ~~name~~two tocontracts ~~Pacific~~from ~~Land~~Morris Kahn & ~~Coffee Corporation~~Associates, ~~and~~owned inby ~~2010~~our CEO, toMorris ~~Orpheum Property~~Kahn, ~~Inc. References~~as towell ~~Orpheum~~as ~~Property,~~prepaid ~~Inc.~~tax-credit inconsulting ~~this~~services ~~report~~to ~~are~~be toprovided ~~the~~by ~~combined~~Morris ~~entity~~Kahn ~~unless~~for ~~otherwise~~the ~~noted~~Orpheum Theater project. ~~Prior~~The totwo contracts entitle the ~~exchange,~~Company ~~Back~~to ~~Channel~~collect ~~Investments~~fees totaling $960,000 ~~Inc~~over a 20 year period., The ~~Pacific~~present ~~Land~~value ~~and~~of ~~Coffee~~the ~~Company~~two ~~and~~tax-credit ~~Orpheum~~consulting ~~Property~~contracts, ~~Inc.~~calculated ~~had~~based noon ~~affiliation~~the orexpected ~~prior~~dates ~~relationship~~of receipt, is $555,502. The ~~terms~~Company ofpurchased the ~~share~~contracts and prepaid the tax-consulting fees in exchange ~~were~~for ~~negotiated~~15,000,000 atshares ~~arm's~~of ~~length~~common stock.

28On January 19, 2012, the Company issued 14,134,615 shares of common stock as payment to a related company owned in part by the Company’s Chairman, Andrew Reid, as compensation for commissions earned on several of the Company’s asset purchases.

~~PART~~The IVCompany does not have any independent directors. For purposes of determining director independence, we used the standards applicable to companies listed on the NASDAQ Stock Exchange, which are not applicable to us.

ITEM 14. ~~EXHIBITS~~ PRINCIPAL ~~AND~~ACCOUNTANT ~~REPORTS~~FEES ONAND ~~FORM 8-K~~SERVICES

(a) Exhibits. The following exhibits of the Company are included herein.

Exhibit No.	Document Description
2	Agreement and Plan of Reorganization between Back Channel Investments, Inc. and Orpheum Property, Inc. (2)
2.2	Board Resolution accepting the assets as a contribution to capital. (5)
3	Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws
	3.1.	Articles of Incorporation(1)
	3.2	Articles of Amendment(2)
	3.3	Bylaws(1)
10	Material Contracts
	10.1	Stock Option Plan(1)
	10.2	Sublease of Roaster Facilities(4)
16	Letter regarding change in certifying accountant(3)
21	Subsidiaries. The Company has no subsidiaries, and operates under the trade name Axiom Global Properties.
31	31.	Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer - Rule 13a-15(e) Certification. Filed herewith.
	32.	Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer - Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 906 Certification. Filed herewith.

___________

Filed herewith

(1) Filed with the Company's original Form 10-SB.

(2) Filed with Registration Statement on Form SB-2, file no. 333-105564 and incorporated by reference.

(3) Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated September 8, 2003.

(4) Filed with Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement 333-105564 and incorporated by reference

(5) Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 6, 2006.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K. None

ITEM 16. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES.

Audit Fees

This category includes the aggregate fees billed for professional services rendered for the audits of our financial statements for the fiscal years ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011, for the ~~reviews~~review of the financial statements included in our reports on Form 10-Q, and for the services that are normally provided by the independent auditors in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for the relevant fiscal years. Audit fees pertaining to services provided to the Company for the fiscal years ended March 31, ~~2011~~2012 and ~~2010~~2011 amount to $4458,~~048~~850 and $44,~~645, respectively~~048.

Audit Committees pre-approval policies and procedures.

We do not have an audit committee. Our engagement of LaPorte, ~~A Professional Accounting Corporation,~~ was approved by the Board of Directors. No services described in Item 9(e)(2) through 9(e)(4) of Schedule 14A were performed by our auditors.

3027

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) Exhibits. The following exhibits of the Company are included herein.

Exhibit No. Document Description

2.	Agreement and Plan of Reorganization between Back Channel Investments, Inc. and Orpheum Property, Inc. (1)

2.2	Board Resolution accepting the assets as a contribution to capital.(2)

3.	Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws

3.1.(a)

Articles of Incorporation(3)

(b)

December 31, 2004 Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Back Channel Investments, Inc. (1)

(c)

September 25, 2007 Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Pacific Land and Coffee Corporation. (4)

(d)

December 23, 2010 Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Pacific Land and Coffee Corporation. (4)

(e)

June 13, 2011 Certificate of Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation of Orpheum Property, Inc.. (4)

3.2

Bylaws(1)

10.	Material Contracts

10.1	Stock Option Plan(3)

31.1	Chief Executive Officer - Rule 13a-15(e) Certification. Filed herewith.

31.2	Chief Financial Officer - Rule 13a-15(e) Certification. Filed herewith.

32.1	Chief Executive Officer - Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 906 Certification.

32.2	Chief Financial Officer - Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 906 Certification.

101	Interactive Data File

(3)	Filed with the Company's original Form 10-SB.

(1)	Filed with Registration Statement on Form SB-2, file no. 333-105564 and incorporated by reference.

(2)	Incorporated by reference to the Current Report on Form 8-K dated November 6, 2006.

(4)	Incorporated by reference to Form 10-Q for the period ended December 31, 2011.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on ~~August 6~~October15, 2012.

ORPHEUM PROPERTY, INC. By: /s/ Morris Kahn Morris Kahn Chief Executive Officer By: /s/ Tyrus C. Young Tyrus C. Young Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities on ~~August~~October 615, 2012.

By: /s/ Morris Kahn Morris Kahn Chief Executive Officer ~~Morris Kahn~~ (principal executive officer) By: /s/ Tyrus C. Young Tyrus C. Young Chief Financial Officer ~~and~~& Director ~~Tyrus C. Young~~ (principal financial and accounting officer) By: /s/ Andrew V. Reid Andrew V. Reid Chairman

Filing Compare · Orpheum Property Inc