UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

þ	QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 0R 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: ~~June~~September 30, 2010

¨o TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 0R 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from:

Commission file number: 0-21255

WE SAVE HOMES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada		26-4238285
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.
2300 East Katella Ave., Suite 300 Anaheim, CA		92806
2300 East Katella Ave., Suite 445 Anaheim, CA		92806
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Issuer’s telephone number: (714) 542-4444

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x þ No ¨ o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes o No x o The registrant is not yet subject to this requirement.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filed,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨o Accelerated filer ¨o Non-accelerated filer ¨o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ¨ Yes þ o No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. The number of shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share, outstanding as of ~~August~~November 1722, 2010 was 1415,~~524~~824,207.

Table of Contents

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Part I - Financial Information
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)	1	3
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2010 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2009		3
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2010 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2009	1
Consolidated Statements of Operations Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)		4
Consolidated Statements of Operations Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)	2
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)		5
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 (Unaudited)	3
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	4	6
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	10	11
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	13	15
Item 4. Controls and Procedures	14	15
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Part II – Other Information
Item 1. Legal Proceedings	15	16
Item 1A. Risk Factors	15	16
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	15	16
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities	15	16
Item 4. Reserved	15	16
Item 5. Other Information	15	16
Item 6. Exhibits	16	17
Signatures	17	18

We Save Homes, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Balance Sheets
	June 30,			December 31,
	2010			2009
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash	$	3,088		$	33,266
Accounts receivable - net		187			5,194
Prepaid expenses		4,640			44,418
Total current assets		7,915			82,878
Property and equipment, net		41,572			52,826
Total assets	$	49,487		$	135,704
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	121,160		$	197,483
Accrual for potential penalties and fines		320,336			720,336
Notes payable - stockholders		636,523			138,916
Convertible note payable - related party		100,000			100,000
Unearned income		-			13,476
Total current liabilities		1,178,019			1,170,211
Stockholders' deficit
Preferred stock $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $0.001 par value: 50,000,000 shares authorized; shares issued and outstanding 14,251,707 and 13,407,707, respectively		14,252			13,408
Additional paid-in capital		7,517,859			5,759,228
Accumulated deficit		(8,660,643	)		(6,807,143	)
Total stockholders' deficit		(1,128,532	)		(1,034,507	)
Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit	$	49,487		$	135,704

PART 1 - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

We Save Homes, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Balance Sheets

	September 30,			December 31,
	2010			2009
	(Unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash	$	169		$	33,266
Accounts receivable - net		-			5,194
Debt issuance costs		54,000			-
Prepaid expenses		673,849			44,418
Total current assets		728,018			82,878

Property and equipment, net		35,852			52,826

Total assets	$	763,870		$	135,704

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT

Current liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	253,129		$	197,483
Accrual for potential penalties and fines		320,336			720,336
Notes payable - (including $849,175 and $138,916, respectively from stockholders)		881,885			138,916
Convertible note payable - stockholder		100,000			100,000
Unearned income		1,250			13,476
Total current liabilities		1,556,600			1,170,211

Stockholders' deficit
Preferred stock $0.001 par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued or outstanding		-			-
Common stock, $0.001 par value: 50,000,000 shares authorized; shares issued: 15,786,707 and 13,407,707, respectively; shares outstanding: 14,911,707 and 13,407,707, respectively		15,787			13,408
Additional paid-in capital		8,667,625			5,759,228
Accumulated deficit		(9,476,142	)		(6,807,143	)
Total stockholders' deficit		(792,730	)		(1,034,507	)

Total liabilities and stockholders' deficit	$	763,870		$	135,704

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

We Save Homes, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statement of Operations

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net revenues	$	-		$	18,238		$	10,282		$	463,654

General and administrative expenses		769,109			3,309,884			2,728,857			5,151,526

Loss from operations		(769,109	)		(3,291,646	)		(2,718,575	)		(4,687,872	)

Other income (expense):
Gain (loss) on settlement of debt		9,814			-			123,614			(1,875	)
Interest expense		(56,204	)		(15,439	)		(74,038	)		(19,545	)

Other income (expense) - net		(46,390	)		(15,439	)		49,576			(21,420	)

Net loss	$	(815,499	)	$	(3,307,085	)	$	(2,668,999	)	$	(4,709,292	)

Net loss per common share - basic and diluted	$	(0.06	)	$	(0.27	)	$	(0.19	)	$	(0.39	)

Weighted average number of common shares outstanding		14,596,761			12,399,457			14,214,614			12,223,892

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

We Save Homes, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statement of Operations
(Unaudited)
	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net revenues	$	9,234		$	61,778		$	10,282		$	445,416
General and administrative expenses		388,082			1,371,970			1,959,748			1,841,642
Loss from operations		(378,848	)		(1,310,192	)		(1,949,466	)		(1,396,226	)
Other income (expense):
Gain (loss) on settlement of debt		113,800			(1,875	)		113,800			(1,875	)
Interest expense		(11,647	)		(2,566	)		(17,834	)		(4,106	)
Other income (expense) - net		102,153			(4,441	)		95,966			(5,981	)
Net loss	$	(276,695	)	$	(1,314,633	)	$	(1,853,500	)	$	(1,402,207	)
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.11	)	$	(0.13	)	$	(0.12	)
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding		14,245,932			12,201,071			14,020,373			12,134,655
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

We Save Homes, Inc. and Subsidiary

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)


		Nine Months Ended September 30,
		2010			2009
Cash flows from operating activities:
	Net loss	$	(2,668,999	)	$	(4,709,292	)
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
	Share based payments		2,510,776			3,587,634
	Depreciation		16,974			16,804
	Amortization of beneficial conversion feature		-			9,804
	Amortization of debt issance costs		36,000			-
	(Gain) Loss on settlement of debt		(123,614	)		1,875
	(Increase) decrease in:
	Accounts receivable		5,194			56,516
	Due from related parties		-			11,530
	Prepaid expenses		(629,431	)		(6,871	)
	Deposits		-			(42,501	)
	Increase (decrease) in:
	Accounts payable and accrued expenses		216,695			28,175
	Accrual for potential penalties and fines		-			200,000
	Unearned income		(12,226	)		8,579
Net cash used in operating activities			(648,631	)		(837,747	)

Cash flows from investing activities:
	Purchase of property and equipment		-			(41,367	)
Net cash used in investing activities			-			(41,367	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
	Proceeds from notes payable		705,534			292,625
	Payment of debt issuance costs		(90,000	)		-
	Common stock issued for cash		-			650,000
	Collection of subscription receivable		-			186,509
Net cash provided by financing activities			615,534			1,129,134

Net (decrease) increase in cash			(33,097	)		250,020
Cash, beginning of period			33,266			-
Cash, end of period		$	169		$	250,020

SUPPLEMENTARY CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Income taxes paid		$	-		$	800
Interest paid		$	-		$	4,880

SUPPLEMENTARY DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Accrued settlement paid by stockholder		$	400,000		$	-
Accrued settlement paid by stockholder Common shares issued for acquisition of subsidiary		$	-		$	10,000

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements

We Save Homes, Inc. and Subsidiary
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
	The Six Months Ended June 30,
	2010			2009
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(1,853,500	)	$	(1,402,207	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Share based payments		1,359,475			680,407
Depreciation		11,254			11,083
(Gain) Loss on settlement of debt		(113,800	)		1,875
(Increase) decrease in:
Accounts receivable		5,007			51,015
Due from related parties		-			11,530
Prepaid expenses		39,778			(2,500	)
Deposits		-			(40,001	)
Increase (decrease) in:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		54,050			91,545
Accrual for potential penalties and fines		-			200,000
Unearned income		(13,476	)		34,997
Net cash used in operating activities		(511,212	)		(362,256	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment		-			(41,367	)
Net cash used in investing activities		-			(41,367	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Common stock issued for cash		-			150,000
Proceeds from note payable - stockholders		481,034			242,625
Collection of subscription receivable		-			186,509
Net cash provided by financing activities		481,034			579,134
Net (decrease) increase in cash		(30,178	)		175,511
Cash, beginning of period		33,266			-
Cash, end of period	$	3,088		$	175,511
SUPPLEMENTARY CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Income taxes paid	$	-		$	-
Interest paid	$	-		$	1,547
SUPPLEMENTARY DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Accrued settlement paid by stockholder	$	400,000		$	-
Common shares issued for acquisition of subsidiary	$	-		$	10,000
See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

We Save Homes, Inc. and Subsidiary

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

~~June~~September 30, 2010

(Unaudited)

NOTE 1 – Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X.

The financial information as of December 31, 2009 is derived from the audited consolidated financial statements presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. The unaudited consolidated interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, which contains the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, together with the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Result of Operations, for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Certain information or footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission for interim financial reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all the information and footnotes necessary for a comprehensive presentation of financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. It is management's opinion, however, that all material adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) have been made which are necessary for a fair financial statement presentation. The interim results for the period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of results for the full fiscal year.

NOTE 2 – Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Nature of Operations

The Company had offered foreclosure mitigation solutions for distressed homeowners. As of August 2009, the Company ceased to offer or accept any new loan modification cases.

The Company ~~plans~~now tooffers ~~offer~~short ~~retail~~sale ~~subscriptions~~services towhereby anit ~~online~~works ~~application~~with ~~which~~lenders, ~~will allow~~ homeowners, toattorneys ~~store~~ and ~~access~~/or ~~information for~~ real estate ~~and~~brokers ~~mortgage~~to ~~lending~~facilitate ~~activities,~~the ~~such~~sale asof ~~loss~~a ~~mitigation. In~~residential ~~addition,~~property ~~the~~for ~~Company~~less ~~plans~~than tothe ~~offer~~outstanding ~~this~~mortgage. Through ~~service~~the toCompany’s ~~lenders,~~associations ~~banks~~and network, ~~real~~it ~~estate~~believes ~~brokers~~that ~~and~~it ~~professionals~~can toshorten ~~perform~~the ~~various~~time ~~real~~often ~~estate~~required ~~related~~for ~~transactions~~ such as short sales, ~~loan~~which ~~restructure,~~benefit ~~refinancing~~the ~~and~~mortgage ~~other~~note ~~features~~holder, tothe behomeowner ~~developed~~and atbuyer aof ~~later~~residential ~~time~~properties.

The Company also provides a similar service to mortgage note holders who have already foreclosed on a property and who seek to find a qualified buyer on a timely basis.

In both cases, the Company receives fees in exchange for its services which are typically paid through escrow when a property is sold.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principles of Consolidation

All significant intercompany accounts and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.

Risks and uncertainties

The Company operates in an industry that is subject to intense competition and change in consumer demand. The Company's operations are subject to significant risk and uncertainties including financial and operational risks including the potential risk of business failure. Also, see Note 6 regarding going concern and liquidity.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Such estimates and assumptions impact, among others, the following: the fair value of warrants granted, estimates of the probability and potential magnitude of contingent liabilities and the valuation allowance for deferred tax assets due to continuing operating losses.

Making estimates requires management to exercise significant judgment. It is at least reasonably possible that the estimate of the effect of a condition, situation or set of circumstances that existed at the date of the consolidated financial statements, which management considered in formulating its estimate could change in the near term due to one or more future confirming events. Accordingly, the actual results could differ significantly from our estimates.

Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash, accounts ~~receivable,~~payable ~~prepaid~~and accrued expenses, ~~accounts payable,~~ notes payable ~~(related party)~~, and convertible notes payable ~~(related party)~~. The carrying values of ~~cash,~~these ~~accounts~~instruments ~~receivable, accounts payable, notes payable and convertible notes payable~~ are representative of their fair values due to their short-term maturities.

Revenue Recognition

The Company had generated revenues from providing loan modification services to homeowners through an advance fee agreement. The Company collected service fees in advance and deposited them into a trust account and recorded the fees as unearned revenues. Only when the agreed activities or services were completed in their respective phases, ~~were~~ the fees were withdrawn from the trust account and recognized as revenues. Since this revenue source is not viable, the Company no longer provides loan modification services.

Subscriptions are recognized ratably over the life of the related agreement. The Company has recorded $01,250 and $13,476 as unearned income under the terms of the online service business model as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The reduction in unearned revenue relates to refunds for services that were never provided and for which no future obligation is expected.

Share Based Payments

Generally, all forms of share-based payments, including stock option grants, warrants, restricted stock grants and stock appreciation rights, are measured at their fair value on the awards’ grant date, and based on the estimated number of awards that are ultimately expected to vest. Share-based payment awards issued to non-employees for services rendered are recorded at either the fair value of the services rendered or the fair value of the share-based payment, whichever is more readily determinable. The expense resulting from share-based payments are recorded as a component of general and administrative expense.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share

In accordance with accounting guidance now codified as FASB ASC Topic 260, “Earnings per Share,” basic earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during each period. Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of shares of common stock, common stock equivalents and potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period.

~~The Company had the following potential common stock equivalents at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:~~5

	June 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
Warrants		15,000		15,000
Total common stock equivalents		15,000		15,000

The Company had the following potential common stock equivalents at September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:

	September 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
Warrants		15,000		15,000
Total common stock equivalents		15,000		15,000

Since the Company reflected a net loss in for ~~the~~all ~~period~~periods ~~ended June 30~~presented, ~~2010 and 2009, respectively,~~ the effect of considering any common stock equivalents, if outstanding, would have been anti-dilutive. A separate computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share is not presented.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (“ASU 2010-06”). ASU 2010-06 amends ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements” ("ASC 820") to require a number of additional disclosures regarding fair value measurements. The amended guidance requires entities to disclose the amounts of significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the reasons for these transfers, the reasons for any transfers in or out of Level 3, and information in the reconciliation of recurring Level 3 measurements about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis. The ASU also clarifies the requirement for entities to disclose information about both the valuation techniques and inputs used in estimating Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements. The amended guidance was effective for financial periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except the requirement to disclose Level 3 transactions on a gross basis, which becomes effective for financial periods beginning after December 15, 2010. ASU 2010-06 did not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In April 2010, The FASB issued ASU No. 2010-17, Revenue Recognition – Milestone Method (Topic 605), to provide guidance on the criteria that should be met for determining whether the milestone method of revenue recognition is appropriate. The amendments in the update are effective on a prospective basis for milestones achieved for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning on or after June 15, 2010. Early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the future impact of this new accounting update to its unaudited interim consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 3 - ~~Notes Payable to Shareholders and Convertible Notes Payable to Related Party~~Debt

At ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, secured and unsecured notes payable ~~to shareholders~~, and convertible ~~notes~~note payable to ~~related~~stockholders ~~party~~consist ~~consists~~ of:

	2010		2009
Note payable:
Notes payable:
Secured	$	~~567~~812,~~462~~275	$	71,916
Unsecured		69,~~061~~610		67,000
		636,523		138,916
	$	881,885	$	138,916
Convertible note payable - related party		100,000		100,000
Convertible note payable - stockholder	$	100,000	$	100,000

During the ~~fiscal~~nine ~~years~~months ended ~~December~~September 3130, ~~2009 and 2008~~2010, the Company borrowed ~~$463,500~~an ~~and~~aggregate $~~100~~705,~~000,~~534. ~~respectively,~~These ~~from~~notes ~~shareholders.~~are ~~The~~due ~~Company~~on ~~repaid~~various ~~$275,000~~dates offrom ~~those~~December, ~~borrowings~~2010 ~~and~~to ~~converted~~August, ~~$50~~2011,~~000~~ ofbear ~~principal~~interest ~~into~~at ~~common~~10%-12% ~~stock~~and ~~during~~are ~~2009. The~~secured ~~Company~~by ~~recorded~~all aassets ~~loss~~ of ~~$1,875~~the onCompany. ~~the~~In ~~debt~~connection ~~conversion~~with ~~based~~one onof such borrowings, the ~~market~~Company ~~value~~issued of250,000 ~~its~~shares of common stock. ~~During~~as ~~the~~a ~~six~~loan ~~months~~fee. ~~ended~~Such ~~June 30~~shares, ~~2010: (a)~~valued ~~one~~at ~~shareholder~~$90,000 ~~advanced~~based ~~cash~~upon ~~and~~the ~~paid~~quoted ~~expenses~~closing ontrading ~~behalf~~price, ofhave ~~the~~been ~~Company~~recorded ~~for~~as ~~$433,984~~debt ~~and~~issuance ~~the~~costs ~~maturity~~and ~~date~~are ~~has~~being ~~been~~amortized ~~extended~~over ~~through~~the ~~December~~term ~~31,~~of ~~2010~~the ~~and~~debt. ~~(b)~~Unamortized ~~one~~debt ~~shareholder~~issuance ~~borrowed~~costs ~~$50,000~~as ~~and~~of isSeptember ~~due~~30, on2010 ~~June~~amounted ~~30,~~to ~~2011~~$54,000.

~~Secured~~Unsecured notes ~~payable to shareholders~~ bear interest at 103.25% and are past due. ~~The~~Their original due date was one year from the date of issuance. These notes are ~~secured~~currently byin ~~all~~default ~~assets~~and the Company is in the process of negotiating an extension of the ~~Company~~due dates on these loans.

~~Unsecured~~The ~~notes~~convertible ~~bear~~note ~~interest~~is atalso ~~3.25%~~past due and ~~are~~the ~~past~~Company ~~due.~~is ~~Their~~in ~~original~~the ~~due~~process ~~date~~of ~~was~~negotiating ~~one~~and ~~year~~extension ~~from~~of the due date offor ~~issuance~~the loan. ~~These~~The ~~notes~~note ~~are~~bears ~~currently~~interest inof ~~default~~10%, and contains a conversion provision which gives the ~~Company~~lender isthe inright to convert the ~~process~~balance due into common stock of ~~obtaining~~the anCompany ~~extension~~at ~~for~~$2.00 per share or at a prevailing offer rate. The fair value of the ~~due~~beneficial ~~dates~~conversion onfeature ~~these~~at ~~loans~~the commitment date of this convertible note was $100,000 which was fully amortized in 2009.

~~The~~NOTE ~~convertible~~4 ~~note~~– is also past due and the Company is in the process of extending the due date for the loan. The note bears interest of 10%, and contains a conversion provision which gives the lender the right to convert the balance due into common stock of the Company at $2.00 per share or at the prevailing offer rate. The fair value of the beneficial conversion feature at the commitment date of this convertible note was $100,000 which has been fully amortized in 2009.Contingencies

~~NOTE~~In 42009, –the ~~Contingencies~~Company ~~and~~accrued ~~Commitments~~for potential obligations relating to the discontinuance of its loan modification business in the amount of $320,336 in connection with a dispute with a consultant.

In October 2009, a shareholder asserted a claim and threatened litigation against the Company ~~accrued~~and ~~for~~certain ~~potential~~officers, ~~obligations~~directors ~~relating~~and toshareholders. The Company and the ~~discontinuance~~individuals ofinvolved ~~its~~entered ~~loan~~into ~~modification~~a ~~business~~settlement in December 2009 with the ~~amount~~stockholder, which included the repurchase of 1,816,000 shares by another shareholder of all of the disputing shareholder’s shares in the Company for $~~200~~400,000. In January 2010, the Company obtained a general and ~~accrued~~mutual release for any potential legal action. The payment of $~~120~~400,~~336~~000 inhas ~~connection~~been ~~with~~credited ato ~~dispute~~Additional ~~with~~Paid ain ~~consultant~~Capital.

In October 2009, a shareholder asserted a claim and threatened litigation against the Company and certain officers, directors and shareholders. The Company and the individuals involved entered into a settlement in December 2009 with the stockholder, which included the repurchase of 1,816,000 by another shareholder of all of the disputing shareholder’s shares in the Company for $400,000. In January 2010, the Company obtained a general and mutual release for any potential legal action. The payment of $400,000 has been credited to Additional Paid in Capital.

NOTE 5 – Stockholders’ Deficit

(A) 2010 stock ~~issuance~~issued for services

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the Company issued ~~844~~1,279,000 shares ~~of common stock~~ for services rendered, having a fair value of $1,~~359~~593,~~475~~776 (average ~~price~~ of $1.6125/share), based upon the quoted closing trading price. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the Company issued 125,000 shares of common stock for services rendered, having a fair value of $668,750 (average price of $5.35/share), based upon the quoted closing trading price.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company issued 1,100,000 shares for services to be rendered over a term ranging from twelve to twenty four months, having a fair value of $917,000 (ranging from $0.51-$1.12/share), based upon the quoted closing trading price on the grant date. The shares issued vest as follows:

● 100,000 on July 1, 2010;

● 125,000 at the end of each quarter over a twelve-month period; and

● 20,834 over a twenty four-month period.

In connection with the shares issued for prepaid services, the Company expensed approximately $253,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010. Additionally, at September 30, 2010, 225,000 shares vested and 875,000 shares remain unvested. As a result, the non-vested shares are considered issued but not outstanding for purposes of computing earnings per share.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company issued 925,000 shares of common stock for services rendered, having a fair value of $3,587,634 (average price of $3.88/share), based upon the quoted closing trading price.

(B)

Warrants

The following is a summary of the Company’s warrant activity:

	Warrants		Weighted Average Exercise Price
			Weighted
			Average
	Warrants		Exercise Price
Outstanding - December 31, 2008		-	$	-
Granted		15,001		2.00
Exercised		-		-
Forfeited/Cancelled		-		-
Outstanding - December 31, 2009		15,001		2.00
Exercised - December 31, 2009		15,001		2.00
Exercisable - December 31, 2009		15,001		2.00
Granted		-		-
Exercised		-		-
Forfeited/Cancelled		-		-
Outstanding - June 30, 2010		15,001	$	2.00
Outstanding - September 30, 2010		15,001	$	2.00
Exercisable - June 30, 2010		15,001	$	2.00
Exercisable - September 30, 2010		15,001	$	2.00

8The warrants outstanding and exercisable have an exercise price of $2.00 per share, and a remaining contractual life of 4.07 years. At September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, warrants outstanding and exercisable had no intrinsic value.

~~The~~NOTE ~~warrants~~6 – Going ~~outstanding~~Concern and exercisable have an exercise price of $2.00 per share, and a remaining contractual life of 4.32 years. At June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, warrants outstanding and exercisable had no intrinsic value.Liquidity

~~NOTE~~As ~~6 – Going~~reflected ~~Concern~~in the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company has a net loss of $2,668,999 and net cash used in operating activities amounted to $648,631. At September 30, 2010, the Company has a working capital deficit of $828,582 and a stockholders’ deficit of $792,730.

As reflected in the accompanying unaudited consolidated interim financial statements, for the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company has a net loss of $1,853,500 and net cash used in operating activities amounted to $511,212. At June 30, 2010, the Company has a working capital deficit of $1,170,104 and a stockholders’ deficit of $1,128,532.

The ability of the Company to continue its operations is dependent on Management's plans, which include the raising of capital through debt and/or equity markets with some additional funding from other traditional financing sources, including term notes, until such time that funds provided by operations are sufficient to fund working capital requirements. The Company may need to incur additional liabilities with certain related parties to sustain the Company’s existence.

The Company will require additional funding to finance the growth of its current and expected future operations as well as to achieve its strategic objectives. The Company believes its current available cash along with anticipated revenues may be insufficient to meet its cash needs for the near future. There can be no assurance that financing will be available in amounts or terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. Subsequent to ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the Company borrowed $9770,~~500~~000 from ~~stockholder~~stockholders and third parties, in addition to amounts outstanding as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, and also received $50,000 from a third party in connection with a subscription agreement for senior securities.

The accompanying unaudited ~~consolidated~~ interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recovery of the recorded assets or the classification of the liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

NOTE 7 – Gain on Legal Settlement

During 2010, the Company settled professional fees with third parties as follows:

Balance due - June 30, 2010	$	123,800
Balance due	$	133,614
Amount of Settlement		10,000
Amount of settlement		10,000
Gain on settlement of debt	$	~~113~~123,~~800~~614

In 2009, the Company recognized a ~~gain~~loss on settlement of debt for $1,875.

NOTE 8 – Subsequent Events

(A)	Increase in secured notes payable

On ~~July~~October 141, 2010, the Company borrowed $1550,000 from a ~~shareholder~~third party. ~~This~~The ~~loan~~note is due on December 31, 2010, ~~and~~ bears interest at 1012%, and it is secured by all assets of the Company.

On November 9, 2010, the Company borrowed $20,000 from a stockholder. The note is due August 29, 2011, bears interest at 10%, and is secured by all assets of the Company.

On July 29, 2010 the Company borrowed $75,000 from a certain lender. This loan is due December 31, 2010, at which time the Company is due to pay the lender $82,500, inclusive of $7,500 in simple interest. The loan is secured by 250,000 shares of the Company’s common stock. In return for the loan of funds, the third party is to receive certain rights and consideration.

On August 6, 2010, the Company borrowed $7,500 from a certain lender. This loan is due on December 31, 2010, bears interest at 10% per annum, and is unsecured.

(B)	Issuance of common stock

Subsequent to ~~June~~September 30, 2010 the Company issued 5575,000 shares of restricted common stock for certain consulting and advisory services.

On October 12, 2010, the Company received $50,000 from a third party in the form of a subscription agreement for senior securities.

On July 1, 2010, David R. Wells (“Mr. Wells”) was appointed Chief Financial Officer of the Company. Under the terms of his employment agreement (the “Agreement”), Mr. Wells will be employed as the Chief Financial Officer of the Company for a period of one (1) year. Mr. Wells will be compensated at with a salary of $240,000 per year, plus any eligible performance bonuses, subject to pro-rata reduction based on amount of time dedicated to the Company. In addition, Mr. Wells will be issued 600,000 restricted shares of the Company common stock (the “Shares”), the Shares vest quarterly over the term of his Agreement.9

10Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS F FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

General

The following discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited interim consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (“Report”). Except for the historical information contained in this Report, the following discussion contains certain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties, such as statements of our plans, objectives, expectations and intentions. Our actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors including, but not limited to, those discussed in the section of ~~this~~our Annual Report ~~titled~~on Form 10-K filed with the SEC entitled “Risk Factors”, as well as other factors, some of which will be outside of our control. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which relate only to events as of the date on which the statements are made. We undertake no obligation to publicly revise these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date hereof. You should refer to and carefully review the information in future documents we file with the SEC.

Overview

Plan of Operation

We Save Homes, Inc. dba Servicers Direct (the “Company" or “Servicers Direct”) has not generated sufficient revenue so it intends to report its plan of operation below. The ability of the Company to achieve its business objectives is contingent upon its success in raising additional capital until adequate revenues are realized from operations.

History

The Company was organized under the laws of the State of Nevada on May 19, 2006. On March 23, 2009, the Company, exchanged, pursuant to a Share Exchange Agreement with its now-subsidiary, Mortgage Modification Legal Network (“MMLN”), (the “Share Exchange Agreement”), an aggregate of 10,000,000 shares of its common stock for all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of MMLN from the MMLN security holders. On March 30, 2009, our Board of Directors and shareholders approved a change in our name to We Save Homes, Inc. (“WESA”). The Company on May 20, 2009 amended its Articles of Incorporation with the State of Nevada and amended its Bylaws to change its end of fiscal year to December 31, effective June 8, 2009. The Amendment also allowed the Company to consummate its name change to We Save Homes, Inc. On June 8, 2009, the Company received notice from the State of Nevada confirming the Amendment. On June 17, 2010 we announced the intent to rename the Company to better reflect the change in business model. The new formal name, Servicers Direct, has been filed as a dba of the Company on June 10, 2010, and we will beask ~~formally~~our ~~voted~~shareholders to vote on bythe ~~our~~name ~~shareholders~~change at our next shareholder meeting.

The principal offices are located at 2300 East Katella Ave., Suite ~~300~~445, Anaheim, CA 92806. Our telephone number is (714) 542-4444. Our website is www.servicersdirect.com.

The Company, through its subsidiary, MMLN, during 2009 offered potential foreclosure mitigation solutions for distressed homeowners using two (2) business models. First, MMLN had a retail program that employed both "grass roots" and "technology based" efforts to reach out directly to the troubled homeowner by helping to inform and provide information as to their various foreclosure mitigation options. Second, MMLN had an affiliate program that marketed specifically to real estate and mortgage professionals. However, the subsidiary discontinued the affiliate program in the second quarter of 2009 due to increased regulation, potential liabilities that outweighed the benefits thereof, and a high degree of significant risks associated with this program. Also in that quarter the Company received a letter from the California Department of Real Estate requesting information regarding business activities in the state of California involving loan modification services. In this correspondence, the DRE also questioned the business activities of a back-end service provider and its licensing status to operate in the state of California. As a result the Company ceased outsourcing back-end processing and brought these activities in-house. During the third quarter of 2009 management determined that the business would ultimately not become successful, and ceased to offer or accept any new loan modification cases.

1110

Business

Servicers Direct ~~provides~~is a ~~full-range~~default ofloan ~~products~~servicing ~~and~~enterprise ~~services~~that ~~for~~assists ~~commercial and~~ residential mortgage ~~servicers~~note ~~throughout~~holders ~~the~~to ~~nation~~liquidate defaulted residential properties. The Company’s ~~regulatory-compliant~~trained ~~default~~personnel ~~management~~incorporate ~~solutions~~the ~~save~~resources ~~time,~~of ~~eliminate~~certain ~~errors,~~partner companies and ~~increase~~specialized ~~efficiency~~software to facilitate short sales and sale of foreclosed properties as is appropriate.

~~These~~For ~~solutions~~its ~~include:~~services, the Company receives fees and a percentage of the home’s value from escrow upon sale, whether it is a short sale or a foreclosed property.

•To ~~REO~~facilitate ~~Management~~short sales or foreclosure sales, the Company contracts with realtors and ~~Servicing:~~a national network of foreclosure inspection and service companies. As a result, the Company supplies a full range of servicing ~~Real~~to ~~Estate~~mortgage ~~Owned~~note ~~(REO)~~holders ~~properties~~for their default portfolio. Lenders, especially regional banks that do not benefit from government support, must work through these defaulted mortgages to move the assets off their balance sheets. Realtors are frustrated by stalled short sales with willing buyers and sellers caused by overwhelmed lender decision makers. SDI works with both sectors to facilitate timely decisions and disposition of mortgage assets.

•The ~~Property~~Company ~~Preservation:~~also ~~ensuring~~benefits ~~that~~from ~~unoccupied~~software ~~properties~~that ~~are~~provides ~~quickly~~workflow ~~secured~~automation and ~~remain~~electronic ~~adequately~~documentation ~~protected~~that ~~throughout~~is ~~the~~available ~~default~~24/7 ~~process.~~to ~~This~~decision ~~segment also includes Home Rehabilitation Services: transforming a neglected property into a marketable property quickly, efficiently and cost-effectively~~makers.

• Property Inspections: offering nationwide commercial and residential inspection services, including 24-hour rush and Saturday service.

• Licensed Independent Escrow Services - an independent escrow corporation serving escrow needs throughout California.

• Short Sale Processing and Negotiations: identifying borrower candidates to list properties, streamlining and expediting the Short Sale process. A short sale is the sale of property where the sale proceeds fall short of the balance owed on the property’s loan.

Servicers Direct utilizes advanced technology solutions to streamline and simplify the default management process. The Company meets the specific needs of commercial and residential mortgage servicers throughout the nation through a technology portfolio, which includes:

• Mitigation software—which ensures fast and efficient load modifications according to FDIC and HAMP regulations.

• Document management and processing—which is a regulatory-compliant system to enable mortgage servicers to overcome the inefficiencies and high costs of conventional document handling, while speeding and simplifying data aggregation, task management, tracking and reporting.

Servicers Direct provides a turnkey, full-service solution to enhance businesses and improve customer relationships. The Company is committed to maximizing its clients’ asset preservation while reducing costs, streamlining operations and optimizing borrower relationships. The technical solutions developed by We Save Homes, Inc. enable default mortgage servicers to meet the increasing demands of an ever-evolving and competitive economy.

Results of Operations

Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009

Revenues – For the period ending ~~June~~September 30, 2010, our net revenue was ~~$9,234~~ zero and our revenue for the period ending ~~June~~September 30, 2009 was $6118,~~778~~238. The substantial decrease is due to the cessation of the loan modification business during the second quarter of 2009. Revenue for the period ending ~~June~~September 30, 2009 consisted solely of loan modification revenue. During 2009 our revenues were comprised of fees received from various law offices and a back end service provider in connection with the marketing and administrative support of loan modification services. Revenue is presented on a Net basis, deducting fees paid to real estate professionals and back end service provider.

General and administrative expenses – General and administrative expenses decreased to $~~388~~769,~~082~~109 for the period ending ~~June~~September 30, 2010 as compared to $13,~~371~~309,~~970~~884 for the ~~prior~~period ~~year~~ending September 30, 2009 primarily due to non-cash expenses from issuance of common stock shares for compensation, consulting and other professional fees in the amount of $~~680~~476,~~407,~~300 asfor ~~well~~the asthree ~~accruals~~months ~~for~~ended ~~potential~~September ~~penalties~~30, ~~and~~2010 ~~fines~~as incompared to $2,907,227 for the ~~amount~~three ofmonths ~~$200~~ended September 30,~~000~~ 2009.

12Loss from operations – Loss from operations for the period ending September 30, 2010 was $769,109 as compared to $3,291,646 for the prior period ending September 30, 2009. The change in loss from operations is primarily due to changes in general and administrative expenses described above.

~~Loss~~Other ~~from~~income ~~operations~~(expense) – ~~Loss~~Other ~~from~~expense ~~operations~~net ~~for~~of ~~the period ending June 30~~$46,390 ~~2010~~is ~~was~~primarily ~~$378,848~~related asto ~~compared~~interest toexpense of $156,~~310,192~~204 ~~for~~offset by the ~~prior~~settlement ~~period~~of ~~ending~~certain ~~June~~debts ~~30,~~with ~~2009~~prior vendors. The ~~change~~Company inwas ~~loss~~able ~~from~~to ~~operations~~settle isthese ~~primarily~~obligations ~~due~~for toless ~~changes~~than inpreviously ~~general~~accrued and ~~administrative~~thereby ~~expenses~~recorded ~~described~~a ~~above~~gain on transaction which is being recorded as gain on settlement of debt.

~~Other~~Nine ~~income~~Months ~~(expense)~~Ended –September ~~Other income of $102~~30,~~153~~ is2010 ~~primarily~~Compared ~~related~~ to ~~the~~Nine ~~settlement~~Months ofEnded ~~certain~~September ~~debts~~30, ~~with prior vendors. The Company was able to settle these obligations for less than previously accrued and thereby recorded a gain on transaction which is being recorded as gain on settlement of debt.~~2009

~~Six~~Revenues ~~Months~~– ~~Ended~~For ~~June~~the period ending September 30, 2010 ~~Compared~~our net revenue was $10,282 and our revenue for the period ending September 30, 2009 was $463,654. The substantial decrease is due to ~~Six~~the ~~Months~~cessation ~~Ended~~of ~~June~~the loan modification business during the second quarter of 2009. Revenue for the period ending September 30, 2009 consisted solely of loan modification revenue. During 2010, our revenues comprised fees received from retail subscription for online applications which will allow homeowners to store and access information for real estate and mortgage lending activities. During 2009 our revenues were comprised of fees received from various law offices and a back end service provider in connection with the marketing and administrative support of loan modification services. Revenue is presented on a Net basis, deducting fees paid to real estate professionals and back end service provider.

Revenues – For the period ending June 30, 2010 our net revenue was $10,282 and our revenue for the period ending June 30, 2009 was $445,416. The substantial decrease is due to the cessation of the loan modification business during the second quarter of 2009. Revenue for the period ending June 30, 2009 consisted solely of loan modification revenue. During 2010, our revenues comprised fees received from retail subscription for online applications which will allow homeowners to store and access information for real estate and mortgage lending activities. During 2009 our revenues were comprised of fees received from various law offices and a back end service provider in connection with the marketing and administrative support of loan modification services. Revenue is presented on a Net basis, deducting fees paid to real estate professionals and back end service provider.11

General and administrative expenses – General and administrative expenses ~~increased~~decreased to $12,~~959~~728,~~748~~857 for the period ending ~~June~~September 30, 2010 as compared to $15,~~841~~151,~~642~~526 for the prior period ending ~~June~~September 30, 2009 primarily due to non-cash expenses from issuance of common stock shares for compensation, consulting and other professional fees in the amount of $12,~~359~~510,~~475~~776 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010 as compared to $~~680~~3,~~407~~587,634 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009.

Loss from operations – Loss from operations for the ~~six~~nine months ending ~~June~~September 30, 2010 was $12,~~949~~718,~~466~~575 as compared to $14,~~396~~687,~~226~~872 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2009. The change in loss from operations is primarily due to changes in general and administrative expenses described above.

Other income (expense) – Other income net of $9549,~~966~~576 is related primarily to the settlement of certain debts with prior vendors, offset by interest expense in the amount of $74,038. The Company was able to settle these obligations for less than previously accrued and thereby recorded a gain on transaction which is being recorded as gain on settlement of debt.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash and working capital – At ~~June~~September 30, 2010, we had cash of $~~3,088~~169 compared to $33,266 at December 31, 2009. At ~~June~~September 30, 2010, we had a working capital deficit of $1828,~~170,104~~582 as compared to a working capital deficit of $1,087,333 at December 31, 2009.

Cash used in operations – During the period ending ~~June~~September 30, 2010, net cash used in operations was $~~511~~648,~~212~~631 and consisted principally of a net loss of $12,~~853~~668,~~500~~999 and was offset by share based payments of $12,~~359~~510,~~475~~776, amortization of debt issuance costs of $36,000 and depreciation of $1116,~~254~~974. The Company also recorded $~~113~~123,~~800~~614 as gain on settlement of debt. For the period ending ~~June~~September 30, 2009, net cash used in operations amounted to $~~362~~837,~~256~~747 consisting principally of a net loss of $14,~~402~~709,~~207~~292, offset by share based payments of $~~680~~3,~~407~~587,634, accrual for potential penalties and fines of $200,000, and depreciation of $1116,~~083~~804. Changes in net working capital accounted for the remaining increase or decrease in operating cash flow in both periods presented.

Investing activities – During the period ending ~~June~~September 30, 2009, we used $41,367 of cash to acquire property and equipment. There were no investing cash flows for the period ending ~~June~~September 30, 2010.

Financing activities – During the period ending ~~June~~September 30, 2010, we financed our operations by receiving loans ~~from~~for ~~stockholders~~$705,534 and paid debt issuance costs of $~~481~~90,~~034~~000. During the same period in 2009 we received proceeds of $186,509 for subscription receivable, loans from stockholders of $~~242~~292,625, and we issued common shares for $~~150~~650,000.

13We have incurred significant losses since our inception, including $2,668,999 and $4,709,292 for the nine months ending September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and we have relied on proceeds from sales of our common stock, along with notes payables and convertible note borrowings, to fund operations and business development and growth. While the majority of the accumulated deficit or losses is the result of non-cash expenses from issuance of common stock shares to various parties for advisory, marketing services and compensations, as well as accrual for potential penalties and fines. We expect that we will continue to experience net losses in the foreseeable future. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we have to curtail operations.

We ~~have~~continue ~~incurred~~to ~~significant~~be ~~losses~~engaged ~~since~~in ~~our~~additional ~~inception,~~fund-raising ~~including~~activities ~~$1,853,500~~to ~~and~~fund $1future operations,~~402,207~~ ~~for~~capital ~~the six months ending June 30~~expenditures, ~~2010~~potential ~~and~~acquisitions ~~2009,~~of ~~respectively~~businesses, and weprovide ~~have~~additional ~~relied~~working oncapital. ~~proceeds~~However, ~~from~~there ~~sales~~is ofno ~~our~~assurance ~~common~~that ~~stock,~~additional ~~along~~financing ~~with~~will ~~convertible~~be ~~note~~available ~~borrowings,~~on tofavorable ~~fund~~terms ~~operations~~or ~~and~~at ~~business~~all. If ~~development~~we ~~and~~raise ~~growth.~~additional ~~While~~capital through the ~~majority~~sale of ~~the~~equity ~~accumulated deficit~~ or ~~losses~~convertible isdebt securities, the ~~result~~issuance of ~~non-cash~~such ~~expenses~~securities ~~from~~may ~~issuance~~result ofin ~~common~~dilution ~~stock shares~~ to ~~various~~existing ~~parties~~stockholders. If ~~for~~we ~~advisory,~~do ~~marketing~~not ~~services~~raise ~~and~~additional ~~compensations~~capital, asthen ~~well~~we aswill ~~accrual~~experience ~~for~~significant ~~potential~~financial ~~penalties~~hardship and ~~fines.~~will Wehave ~~expect~~considerable ~~that~~difficulty weto ~~will~~fund ~~continue~~operations, tobusiness ~~experience~~development, ~~net~~grow ~~losses~~and incontinue ~~the~~as ~~foreseeable~~a ~~future~~going concern. ~~The~~At ~~unaudited~~September ~~consolidated~~30, ~~financial~~2010 ~~statements~~we do not ~~include~~have ~~any~~sufficient ~~adjustments~~cash ~~relating~~ to ~~the~~meet ~~recoverability~~our ~~and~~needs ~~classification~~for ofthe ~~recorded~~next ~~asset~~twelve ~~amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we have to curtail operations~~months.

We continue to be engaged in additional fund-raising activities to fund future operations, capital expenditures, potential acquisitions of businesses, and provide additional working capital. However, there is no assurance that additional financing will be available on favorable terms or at all. If we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, the issuance of such securities may result in dilution to existing stockholders. If we do not raise additional capital, then we will experience significant financial hardship and will have considerable difficulty to fund operations, business development, grow and continue as a going concern. At June 30, 2010 we do not have sufficient cash to meet our needs for the next twelve months.12

Liquidity and Going Concern

As reflected in the accompanying unaudited ~~consolidated~~ interim consolidated financial statements, for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the Company has a net loss of $12,~~853~~668,~~500~~999 and net cash used in operating activities amounted to $~~511~~648,~~212~~631. At ~~June~~ September 30, 2010, the Company has a working capital deficit of $1828,~~170,104~~582 and a stockholders’ deficit of $1792,~~128,532~~730.

The Company will require additional funding to finance the growth of its current and expected future operations as well as to achieve its strategic objectives. The Company believes its current available cash along with anticipated revenues may be insufficient to meet its cash needs for the near future. There can be no assurance that financing will be available in amounts or terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. Subsequent to ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the Company borrowed a total of $9770,~~500~~000 from astockholders ~~stockholder~~ and third parties, in addition to amounts outstanding as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010 and also received $50,000 from a third party in the form of a subscription agreement for senior securities.

Critical Accounting Policies

The discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our unaudited consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an on-going basis, we evaluate our critical accounting policies and estimates. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Our critical accounting policies and estimates are discussed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2009; there have been no material changes in 2010.

14Recent Accounting Pronouncements

~~Recent~~For a description of recent accounting standards, including the expected dates of adoption and estimated effects, if any, on our consolidated financial statements, see “Notes 1 and 2 – Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting ~~Standards~~Policies” in the Notes to Unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q.

~~For~~Item a3. Quantitative ~~description of recent accounting standards, including the expected dates of adoption~~ and ~~estimated~~Qualitative ~~effects,~~Disclosures ifabout ~~any,~~Market ~~on our consolidated financial statements, see “Note 2 – Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements of this Form 10-Q~~Risk.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide this disclosure.

~~ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.~~13

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

(a) Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Regulations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 require public companies to maintain “disclosure controls and procedures,” which are defined to mean a company’s controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms.

We conducted an evaluation, with the participation of our ~~Chief~~Chairman ~~Executive Officer~~ and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the period covered by this Report. Based on that evaluation, our ~~Chief~~Chairman ~~Executive Officer~~ and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of ~~June~~September 30, 2010, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at the reasonable assurance level due to the material weaknesses described below.

A material weakness is a control deficiency (within the meaning of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) Auditing Standard No. 5) or combination of control deficiencies that result in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected. Management has identified the following three material weaknesses in our disclosure controls and procedures:

1. We do not have written documentation of our internal control policies and procedures. Written documentation of key internal controls over financial reporting is a requirement of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have written documentation of our internal controls and procedures on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

2. We do not have sufficient segregation of duties within accounting functions, which is a basic internal control. Due to our size and nature, segregation of all conflicting duties may not always be possible and may not be economically feasible. However, to the extent possible, the initiation of transactions, the custody of assets and the recording of transactions should be performed by separate individuals. Management evaluated the impact of our failure to have segregation of duties on our assessment of our disclosure controls and procedures and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

3. We do not have review and supervision procedures for financial reporting functions. The review and supervision function of internal control relates to the accuracy of financial information reported. The failure to review and supervise could allow the reporting of inaccurate or incomplete financial information. Due to our size and nature, review and supervision may not always be possible or economically possible. Management evaluated the impact of our significant number of audit adjustments and has concluded that the control deficiency that resulted represented a material weakness.

To address these material weaknesses, management performed additional analyses and other procedures to ensure that the financial statements included herein fairly present, in all material respects, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented.

(b) Changes in internal control over financial reporting

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2010, the Company has not made any changes to internal control over financial reporting.

~~PART II, OTHER INFORMATION~~14

~~ITEM~~PART 1.II ~~LEGAL~~- OTHER ~~PROCEEDINGS.~~ INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings.

Not applicable.

~~ITEM~~Item 1A. Risk ~~RISK FACTORS~~Factors.

The information to be reported under this item has not changed since it was disclosed in the previously filed Form 10-K, dated May 17, 2010.

~~ITEM~~Item 2. Unregistered ~~UNREGISTERED~~Sales ~~SALES~~of OFEquity ~~EQUITY~~Securities ~~SECURITIES~~and ~~AND~~Use ~~USE~~of ~~OF PROCEEDS~~Proceeds.

None.

~~ITEM~~Item 3. ~~DEFAULTS~~Defaults ~~UPON SENIOR~~Upon ~~SECURITIES.~~Senior Securities

None.

~~ITEM~~Item 4. ~~RESERVED.~~ Reserved

~~ITEM~~Item 5. Other ~~OTHER INFORMATION~~Information.

Not applicable.

1615

~~ITEM~~Item 6. ~~EXHIBITS~~ Exhibits.

The following exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated by reference:

Exhibit Number		Description
3.1		Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of We Save Homes, Inc. (1)
3.2		Bylaws of We Save Homes, Inc. (1)
31.1		Section 302 Certificate by the Company’s ~~Chief~~Principal Executive Officer*
31.2		Section 302 Certificate by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer*
32.1		Section 906 Certificate by the Company’s ~~Chief~~Principal Executive Officer*
32.2		Section 906 Certificate by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer*

* Filed herewith.

(1) Filed as Exhibits to Schedule 14C on April 9, 2009

1716

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Registrant caused this Report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	We Save Homes, Inc.
August 23, 2010	By:	/s/ Robert Schaefers
November 26, 2010	By:	/s/ Craig Stewart
		Robert Schaefers
		Craig Stewart
		President and Principal Executive Officer
		Chairman (Principal Executive Officer)

	We Save Homes, Inc.
August 23, 2010	By:	/s/ David R. Wells
November 26, 2010	By:	/s/ David R. Wells
		David R. Wells
		Chief Financial Officer
		Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)

1817

Filing Compare · We Save Homes, Inc.