UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June~~September 30, 2007

~~Commission~~TRANSCOMMUNITY ~~File~~FINANCIAL ~~Number:~~CORPORATION ~~000-33355~~(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Virginia

000-33355

54-2032355

(State or other jurisdiction

of incorporation)

(Commission File Number)

(IRS Employer

Identification No.)

Virginia		54-2032355
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)


	4235 Innslake Drive Glen Allen, Virginia 23060
	(Address of principal executive offices)

4235 Innslake Drive Glen Allen, Virginia		23060
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)


	(804) 934-9999
	(Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (~~804~~1) ~~934-9999~~has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(~~Registrant’s~~d) ~~telephone~~of ~~number,~~the ~~including~~Securities ~~area~~Exchange ~~code~~Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [ X ] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ~~[ ] Accelerated filer [ ] Non-accelerated filer [ X ]~~

~~Indicate~~Accelerated byfiler ~~check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [ X ]~~o

~~The~~Non-accelerated ~~number~~filer ~~of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock at the close of business on August 2, 2007 was 4,586,741 shares of common stock, $.01 par value.~~x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock at the close of business on November 2, 2007 was 4,586,741 shares of common stock, $.01 par value.

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

INDEX

		Page No.
	PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements	2
	Consolidated Statements of Financial Condition –
	June 30, 2007 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2006	2
	Consolidated Statements of Operations –
	Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 (Unaudited)	3
	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity –
	Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 (Unaudited)	4
	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows –
	Six Months Ended June 30, 2007 and 2006 (Unaudited)	5
	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	14
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	22
Item 4T.	Controls and Procedures	22
	PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	24
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	24
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	24
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	24
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	24
Item 5.	Other Information	25
Item 6.	Exhibits	26
	SIGNATURES	27

PART I

1FINANCIAL INFORMATION

~~Part~~Page ~~I Financial Information~~No.

Item 1.

Financial Statements

~~TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION~~3

~~CONSOLIDATED~~Consolidated ~~STATEMENTS~~Statements OFof ~~FINANCIAL~~Financial ~~CONDITION~~Condition –

~~JUNE~~September 30, 2007 ~~AND~~(Unaudited) ~~DECEMBER~~and December 31, 2006

~~(dollars in thousands)~~3

~~(unaudited)~~Consolidated Statements of Operations –

	June 30, 2007		December 31, 2006
	Unaudited
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	4,929	$	3,669
Federal funds sold		7,417		1,422
Total cash and cash equivalents		12,346		5,091
Securities available for sale, at fair value		8,265		13,597
Securities held to maturity, fair value of $11,269 and $21,286 at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively		11,399		21,420
Loans		175,063		151,399
Allowance for loan losses		(2,041)		(2,065)
Total loans, net		173,022		149,334
Premises and equipment, net		7,136		6,689
Other investments		896		896
Assets from discontinued operations, net		-		88
Other assets		1,657		1,330
Total assets	$	214,721	$	198,445
Liabilities
Deposits:
Demand:
Noninterest bearing	$	22,644	$	20,450
Interest bearing		37,313		37,850
Savings		9,892		9,478
Time		113,989		97,195
Total deposits		183,838		164,973
Note payable		-		500
Federal funds purchased		-		1,517
Accrued interest payable		643		540
Liabilities from discontinued operations, net		-		10
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		217		352
Total liabilities		184,698		167,892
Stockholders' Equity
Common stock (25,000,000 shares authorized $.01 par value) 4,586,741 and 4,581,741 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively		46		46
Additional paid in capital		39,881		39,809
Accumulated deficit		(9,866)		(9,262)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(38)		(40)
Total stockholders' equity		30,023		30,553
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	214,721	$	198,445

Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (Unaudited)

~~See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.~~4

2Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity –

~~TRANSCOMMUNITY~~Nine ~~FINANCIAL~~Months ~~CORPORATION~~Ended September 30, 2007 (Unaudited)

~~CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS~~5

~~FOR~~Consolidated ~~THE~~Statements ~~THREE~~of ~~AND~~Cash ~~SIX~~Flows ~~MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 AND 2006~~–

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2007 and 2006 (~~unaudited~~Unaudited)

~~(dollars and shares in thousands)~~6

	For the three months ended				For the six months ended
	June 30, 2007		June 30, 2006		June 30, 2007		June 30, 2006
Interest and dividend income
Interest on loans, including fees	$	3,895	$	2,938	$	7,407	$	5,764
Interest on federal funds sold		134		303		333		547
Interest on debt securities		172		182		368		349
Dividends on equity securities		21		24		25		24
Total interest income		4,222		3,447		8,133		6,684
Interest expense
Interest on deposits		1,563		1,009		2,993		1,914
Interest on other borrowed funds		2		110		22		313
Total interest expense		1,565		1,119		3,015		2,227
Net interest income		2,657		2,328		5,118		4,457
Provision for loan losses		66		92		512		144
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		2,591		2,236		4,606		4,313
Noninterest income
Bank service charges and fees		283		299		563		536
Total noninterest income		283		299		563		536
Noninterest expense
Salaries and employee benefits		1,342		1,115		2,657		2,323
Occupancy expenses		188		158		361		330
Equipment expenses		176		142		360		290
Other operating expenses		1,074		757		2,320		1,508
Total noninterest expense		2,780		2,172		5,698		4,451
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes		94		363		(529)		398
Income tax expense		-		-				-
Net income (loss) from continuing operations		94		363		(529)		398
Net loss from discontinued operations		-		(333)		(77)		(492)
Net income (loss)	$	94	$	30	$	(606)	$	(94)
Net income (loss) per share from continuing operations (basic and diluted)	$	0.02	$	0.08	$	(0.12)	$	0.09
Net income (loss) per share from discontinued operations (basic and diluted)	$	0.00	$	(0.07)	$	(0.01)	$	(0.11)
Net income (loss) per share (basic and diluted)	$	0.02	$	0.01	$	(0.13)	$	(0.02)
Weighted average number of shares outstanding		4,587		4,582		4,587		4,582

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

~~See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.~~7

3Item 2.

~~TRANSCOMMUNITY~~Management’s ~~FINANCIAL~~Discussion ~~CORPORATION~~and Analysis of Financial

~~CONSOLIDATED~~Condition ~~STATEMENTS~~and OFResults ~~CHANGES~~of ~~IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY~~Operations

~~FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 AND 2006~~16

~~(Unaudited)~~Item 3.

~~(dollars~~Quantitative and ~~shares~~Qualitative inDisclosures ~~thousands)~~About Market Risk

	Shares of Common Stock	Common Stock Subscriptions		Common Stock		Additional Paid in Capital		Accumulated Deficit		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)		Total
Balance,
December 31, 2005	4,582	$	-	$	46	$	39,778	$	(9,379)	$	(75)	$	30,370
Net loss	-		-		-		-		(94)		-		(94)
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale	-		-		-		-		-		(5)		(5)
Total comprehensive loss	-		-		-		-		-		-		(99)
Stock-based compensation expense	-		-		-		22		-		-		22
Balance,
June 30, 2006	4,582	$	-	$	46	$	39,800	$	(9,473)	$	(80)	$	30,293
Balance,
December 31, 2006	4,582	$	-	$	46	$	39,809	$	(9,262)	$	(40)	$	30,553
Net loss	-		-		-		-		(606)		-		(606)
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale	-		-		-		-		-		2		2
Total comprehensive loss													(604)
Common Stock issued	5		-		-		38						38
Stock-based compensation expense	-		-		-		34		-		-		34
Dissolution of subsidiary	-		-		-		-		2		-		2
Balance,
June 30, 2007	4,587	$	-	$	46	$	39,881	$	(9,866)	$	(38)	$	30,023

~~See~~Item ~~accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements~~4.

4Controls and Procedures

~~TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION~~24

~~CONSOLIDATED~~PART ~~STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS~~II

~~FOR~~OTHER ~~THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 AND 2006~~INFORMATION

~~(Unaudited)~~Item 1.

	For the six months ended
	June 30, 2007		June 30, 2006
Operating activities:
Net loss	$	(606)	$	(94)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		512		144
Amortization of security premiums and accretion of discounts, net		(12)		(9)
Impairment of goodwill		-		321
Depreciation		279		278
Stock-based compensation expense		34		22
(Increase) decrease in other assets		(323)		67
Increase in interest payable		103		108
(Decrease) increase accrued expenses and other liabilities		(145)		5
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		(158)		842
Investing activities:
Purchase of securities held to maturity		(6,000)		(34,500)
Purchase of securities available for sale		(16,522)		(2,250)
Proceeds from maturities of securities held to maturity		16,025		36,500
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale		21,863		-
Purchase of Federal Reserve bank stock		-		(121)
Net increase in loans		(24,183)		(7,914)
Purchase of premises and equipment		(656)		(125)
Net cash used in investing activities		(9,473)		(8,410)
Financing activities:
Net change in federal funds purchased		(1,517)		983
Proceeds from stock options exercised		38		-
Net decrease in note payable		(500)		-
Net decrease in secured borrowings		-		(2,780)
Net increase in noninterest bearing and interest bearing demand deposits		1,657		628
Net increase in savings deposits		414		165
Net increase in time deposits		16,794		7,784
Net cash provided by financing activities		16,886		6,780
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		7,255		(788)
Cash and cash equivalents:
Beginning of the period		5,091		16,816
End of the period	$	12,346	$	16,028
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	2,913	$	1,811

Legal Proceedings

~~See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.~~26

5Item 1A.

~~TRANSCOMMUNITY~~Risk ~~FINANCIAL CORPORATION~~Factors

~~NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)~~26

~~NOTE~~Item ~~1 Principles of Consolidation and Basis of Presentation:~~2.

~~The~~Unregistered ~~accompanying~~Sales ~~unaudited consolidated financial statements include the accounts~~ of ~~TransCommunity~~Equity ~~Financial~~Securities ~~Corporation (“TransCommunity” or the “Company”)~~ and ~~its~~Use ~~consolidated~~of subsidiary TransCommunity Bank, N.A., which includes Main Street Mortgage and Investment Corporation (“Main Street Mortgage”), a former wholly-owned subsidiary that discontinued operations in December 2006. All significant intercompany transactions and balances associated with consolidated subsidiaries have been eliminated.Proceeds

The consolidated financial statements of TransCommunity conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, to general industry practices, and the instructions for Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of only normal recurring accruals) necessary to present fairly the financial position at June 30, 2007, and the results of operations for the three-month and six-month periods ended June 30, 2007 and 2006. The Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition at December 31, 2006 was derived from audited financial data. The preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements, and the disclosure of revenue and expense during the reporting periods. The assumptions are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements and could differ from actual results. The results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of annual performance. The notes included herein should be read in conjunction with the notes to consolidated financial statements included in the audited December 31, 2006 financial statements for TransCommunity, which statements were included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”).26

~~NOTE~~Item ~~2 Impacts of Certain Accounting Pronouncements:~~3.

InDefaults ~~September~~Upon ~~2006,~~Senior the FASB released SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurement”, which provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Statement also responds to investors’ requests for more information about the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value and the effect that fair value measurements have on earnings. SFAS No. 157 will apply whenever another standard requires (or permits) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. The standard does not expand the use of fair value to any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those years. SFAS No. 157 is effective for the Company for years beginning after January 1, 2008, and interim periods within that year. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.Securities

In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities." This Statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. This Statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact that the adoption will have on its consolidated financial position and results of operations. 26

6Item 4.

~~NOTE~~Submission ~~3 Investment~~of ~~Securities:~~Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

The carrying values, unrealized gains, unrealized losses and approximate fair values of investment securities at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006 are shown in the table below. As of June 30, 2007, 17 U.S. Agency Securities with a carrying value of $12.7 million were pledged as collateral for public deposits.26

Securities Available for Sale
June 30, 2007
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
Gov't-sponsored enterprises-discount notes*	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Gov't-sponsored enterprises-notes*		8,303		-		(38)		8,265
Total Securities Available for Sale	$	8,303	$	-	$	(38)	$	8,265

Item 5.

Securities Held to Maturity
June 30, 2007
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
Gov’t-sponsored enterprises-discount notes*	$	4,999	$	-	$	(4)	$	4,995
Gov’t-sponsored enterprises-notes*		6,400		-		(126)		6,274
Total Securities Held to Maturity	$	11,399	$	-	$	(130)	$	11,269

Other Information

Securities Available for Sale
December 31, 2006
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
Gov't-sponsored enterprises-discount notes*		7,213		-	$	(7)		7,206
Gov't-sponsored enterprises-notes*		6,424		-		(33)		6,391
Total Securities Available for Sale	$	13,637	$	-	$	(40)	$	13,597

Securities Held to Maturity
December 31, 2006
	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
Gov't-sponsored enterprises-discount notes*	$	13,008	$	-	$	(12)	$	12,996
Gov't-sponsored enterprises-notes*		8,412		-		(122)		8,290
Total Securities Held to Maturity	$	21,420	$	-	$	(134)	$	21,286
*Issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)

Item 6.

7Exhibits

Investments in an unrealized loss position that are considered temporarily impaired at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, segregated between investments sustaining unrealized losses for periods less than twelve months and twelve months or greater, are displayed in the following tables: 26

Securities Available for Sale
June 30, 2007	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
(dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
Description of securities:
Gov't-sponsored enterprises-notes*	$	7,484	$	(15)	$	781	$	(23)	$	8,265	$	(38)
Gov't-sponsored enterprises-discount notes*		-		-		-		-		-		-
Total	$	7,484	$	(15)	$	781	$	(23)	$	8,265	$	(38)

SIGNATURES

Securities Held to Maturity
June 30, 2007	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
(dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
Description of securities:
Gov't-sponsored enterprises-notes*	$	-	$	-	$	6,274	$	(126)	$	6,274	$	(126)
Gov't-sponsored enterprises-discount notes*		4,995		(4)		-		-		4,995		(4)
Total	$	4,995	$	(4)	$	6,274	$	(126)	$	11,269	$	(130)
*Issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)

Securities Available for Sale
(Dollars in thousands)	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
December 31, 2006	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
Description of securities:
Gov't-sponsored enterprises- notes*	$	4,990	$	(4)	$	1,401	$	(29)	$	6,391	$	(33)
Gov't-sponsored enterprises-discount notes*		7,206		(7)		-		-		7,206		(7)
Total	$	12,196	$	(11)	$	1,401	$	(29)	$	13,597	$	(40)

Securities Held to Maturity
(Dollars in thousands)	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
December 31, 2006	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
Description of securities:
Gov't-sponsored enterprises- notes*	$	1,999	$	(1)	$	6,291	$	(121)	$	8,290	$	(122)
Gov't-sponsored enterprises-discount notes*		12,996		(12)		-		-		12,996		(12)
Total	$	14,995	$	(13)	$	6,291	$	(121)	$	21,286	$	(134)
*Issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)

PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION

~~The~~ITEM ~~June 30, 2007 unrealized loss was the aggregate of 18 U~~1.S. ~~Agency~~FINANCIAL notes, of which 10 had a continuous loss period of more than 12 months. The December 31, 2006 unrealized loss was the aggregate of 20 U.S. Agency notes, of which 11 had a continuous loss period of more than 12 months. The unrealized loss positions in both years were primarily related to interest rate movements as there is minimal credit risk exposure in these investments. All securities are investment grade or better. No impairment loss has been recognized on these securities because management has both the intent and the ability to hold these securities until maturity or call dates.STATEMENTS

8TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

~~Management~~CONSOLIDATED ~~evaluates~~STATEMENTS ~~securities~~OF ~~for~~FINANCIAL other-than-temporary impairment at least on a quarterly basis and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to (1) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (2) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of TransCommunity’s subsidiary bank to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value. CONDITION

~~NOTE~~SEPTEMBER ~~4 Stock~~30, ~~Based~~2007 ~~Compensation:~~AND DECEMBER 31, 2006

~~A stock option plan was adopted by the Board of Directors of the Bank of Powhatan on May 8, 2001~~(~~the~~dollars ~~“2001 Plan”). This 2001 Plan was adopted by TransCommunity effective August 15, 2001~~ in connection with the reorganization in which the Bank of Powhatan became a subsidiary of TransCommunity. The purpose of the 2001 Plan was to reward employees and directors for services rendered and to promote the success of TransCommunity and its subsidiary by providing incentives to employees and directors that will promote the alignment of their personal financial interest with the long-term financial success of TransCommunity and its subsidiaries and with growth in shareholder value. The 2001 Plan provided that options for up to 330,000 shares of TransCommunity common stock may be issued. Under the 2001 Plan, annual grants of stock options were limited to 10,000 shares for each employee and 7,500 shares for each director. The exercise price may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares on the grant date. Unless the Compensation Committee of TransCommunity’s Board of Directors determines otherwise, one-third of a grant becomes vested and exercisable on each of the first three anniversaries of the initial grant date. Each grant becomes fully vested and exercisable in the event of a change in control of TransCommunity. All options are subject to exercise or forfeiture if TransCommunity’s capital falls below its minimum requirements, as determined by its primary regulator, and TransCommunity’s primary regulator so directs. At June 30, 2007, options to acquire 284,625 shares were outstanding, of which 242,625 were exercisable at that date. thousands)

On May 29, 2007, shareholders approved the TransCommunity Financial Corporation 2007 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2007 Plan”). As a result, the Company will not make any more stock option grants under the 2001 Plan. See Part II, Item 5 for more information on the 2007 Plan.


	September 30, 2007		December 31, 2006
	Unaudited
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	6,051	$	3,669
Federal funds sold		4,061		1,422
Total cash and cash equivalents		10,112		5,091
Securities available for sale, at fair value		10,314		13,597
Securities held to maturity, fair value of $6,356 and $21,286 at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively		6,400		21,420
Loans		189,003		151,399
Allowance for loan losses		(2,663)		(2,065)
Total loans, net		186,340		149,334
Premises and equipment, net		7,114		6,689
Other investments		938		896
Assets from discontinued operations, net		-		88
Other assets		1,830		1,330
Total assets	$	223,048	$	198,445
Liabilities
Deposits:
Demand:
Noninterest bearing	$	22,575	$	20,450
Interest bearing		33,802		37,850
Savings		10,357		9,478
Time		125,230		97,195
Total deposits		191,964		164,973
Note payable		-		500
Federal funds purchased		-		1,517
Accrued interest payable		656		540
Liabilities from discontinued operations, net		-		10
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		496		352
Total liabilities		193,116		167,892
Stockholders' Equity
Common stock (25,000,000 shares authorized $.01 par value) 4,586,741 and 4,581,741 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively		46		46
Additional paid in capital		39,904		39,809
Accumulated deficit		(10,027)		(9,262)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		9		(40)
Total stockholders' equity		29,932		30,553
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	223,048	$	198,445

~~Effective~~See ~~January~~accompanying 1,notes ~~2006, TransCommunity adopted SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” using the modified prospective transition method. SFAS No. 123R requires companies~~ to ~~calculate~~unaudited ~~compensation~~consolidated ~~expense~~financial ~~arising from stock-based compensation based on the respective fair values of awards at grant date~~statements.

~~A summary of the options granted is shown in the following table:~~3

	Six months ended June 30,
	2007		2006
Outstanding at January 1	$	246,725	$	281,425
Granted		56,000		5,000
Exercised		(5,000)		-
Lapsed		(13,100)		(1,200)
Options outstanding at June 30		284,625		285,225
Options exercisable at June 30		242,625		274,492
Weighted average exercise price	$	9.97	$	9.96
Weighted average remaining contracted life at June 30		57 months		82 months

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

~~The~~CONSOLIDATED ~~weighted-average~~STATEMENTS ~~grant~~OF date fair value of 56,000 options granted under the 2001 Plan during the six months ended June 30, 2007, was $1.84 per share, which equaled $103,040. The weighted average exercise price of options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2007, was $8.53 per share.OPERATIONS

~~Options~~FOR ~~granted~~THE ~~under~~THREE ~~the~~AND ~~Plan~~NINE ~~generally~~MONTHS ~~expire~~ENDED ~~ten~~SEPTEMBER years after the date of grant and are granted at market value of the stock on the date of grant. Option terms are determined by the Compensation Committee of TransCommunity’s Board of Directors at the time of the grant. TransCommunity utilizes the Black Scholes model to calculate fair values of options awarded. This model requires assumptions as to expected volatility30, ~~dividends,~~2007 ~~terms~~AND ~~and~~2006 ~~risk free rates. Assumptions used for the periods covered herein are outlined in the following table:~~

9 (unaudited)

	Six months ended
	June 30, 2007	June 30, 2006
Expected volatility	20%	5%
Expected dividend	0	0
Expected term (years)	10	10
Risk free rate	4.7%	4.4%

(dollars and shares in thousands except for per share data)

Expected volatilities are based on volatility trends of similar entities in the region, as defined by the SNL Mid-Atlantic Bank Index. Expected dividends reflect the experience of TransCommunity’s common stock. Expected terms represent the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the appropriate life of each option.


	For the three months ended					For the nine months ended
	September 30, 2007		September 30, 2006			September 30, 2007	September 30, 2006
Interest and dividend income
Interest on loans, including fees	$	4,208	$	3,299	$	11,616	$	9,064
Interest on federal funds sold		125		279		458		826
Interest on debt securities		170		196		538		545
Dividends on equity securities		12		8		37		31
Total interest income		4,515		3,782		12,649		10,466
Interest expense
Interest on deposits		1,724		1,194		4,717		3,108
Interest on other borrowed funds		26		162		48		476
Total interest expense		1,750		1,356		4,765		3,584
Net interest income		2,765		2,426		7,884		6,882
Provision for loan losses		622		167		1,134		311
Net interest income after provision for loan losses		2,143		2,259		6,750		6,571
Noninterest income
Bank service charges and fees		269		232		832		768
Total noninterest income		269		232		832		768
Noninterest expense
Salaries and employee benefits		1,405		1,171		4,063		3,494
Occupancy expenses		172		164		533		494
Equipment expenses		167		149		527		438
Other operating expenses		829		750		3,149		2,258
Total noninterest expense		2,573		2,234		8,272		6,684
(Loss) income from continuing operations before income taxes		(161)		257		(690)		655
Income tax expense		-		-		-		-
Net (loss) income from continuing operations		(161)		257		(690)		655
Net loss from discontinued operations		-		(159)		(77)		(651)
Net (loss) income	$	(161)	$	98	$	(767)	$	4
Net (loss) income per share from continuing operations (basic and diluted)	$	(0.04)	$	0.06	$	(0.15)	$	0.14
Net (loss) income per share (basic and diluted)	$	(0.04)	$	0.02	$	(0.17)	$	0.00
Weighted average number of shares outstanding		4,587		4,582		4,587		4,582

~~NOTE~~See ~~5 Earnings~~accompanying ~~(Losses)~~notes ~~Per~~to ~~Share:~~unaudited consolidated financial statements.

Basic earnings (losses) per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net income or loss by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, including the effect of dilutive potential common shares outstanding attributable to stock awards. Reported basic and dilutive earnings per share are the same as the effect on EPS of TransCommunity’s outstanding stock options would be antidilutive.4

~~NOTE~~TRANSCOMMUNITY ~~6 Business~~FINANCIAL ~~Segments:~~CORPORATION

~~TransCommunity~~CONSOLIDATED ~~has~~STATEMENT ~~two~~OF ~~reportable~~CHANGES ~~business~~IN ~~segments:~~STOCKHOLDERS' “Community Banking” and “Holding Company Operations.” The Community Banking segment consists of the Company’s four subsidiary banks which were consolidated in June 2007, each of which provides loan, deposit, mortgage and investment services to retail and commercial customers in their respective market areas. Holding Company Operations consists of the parent company, which provides managerial support, as well as an operational platform of shared services utilized by each of the subsidiary banks. EQUITY

~~During~~FOR ~~2006,~~THE ~~the~~NINE ~~Company~~MONTHS ~~had~~ENDED ~~two~~SEPTEMBER ~~additional business segments~~30, “Main Street Mortgage,” which provided a variety of mortgage loan products across the country under the exemption granted as a subsidiary of a nationally-chartered bank, and “Financial Services,” which offered trust, asset management and securities and insurance brokerage services. The activities of both of these business segments were discontinued during 2006. The services previously provided by both of these business segments have been transferred to the Community Banking segment.2007

~~A summary of the business segments is shown in the following table:~~ (unaudited)

	For three months ended June 30, 2007
	(dollars in thousands)
	Community Banking		Main Street		Trans-Community		Eliminations		Consolidated
Net interest income (expense)	$	2,656	$	-	$	1	$	-	$	2,657
Provision for loan losses		(66)		-		-		-		(66)
Noninterest income		281		-		987		(985)		283
Noninterest expense		(3,073)		-		(1,014)		1,307		(2,780)
(Loss) income from subsidiaries		-		-		(202)		202		-
Net (loss) income from continuing operations		(202)		-		(228)		524		94
Net loss from discontinued operations		-		-		-		-		-
Net (loss) income	$	(202)	$	-	$	(228)	$	524	$	94
Total Assets	$	214,209	$	-	$	30,084	$	(29,572)	$	214,721

(dollars and shares in thousands)


	Shares of Common Stock	Common Stock Subscriptions		Common Stock		Additional Paid in Capital		Accumulated Deficit		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)		Total
Balance,
December 31, 2006	4,582	$	-	$	46	$	39,809	$	(9,262)	$	(40)	$	30,553
Net loss	-		-		-		-		(767)		-		(767)
Unrealized gain on securities available for sale	-		-		-		-		-		49		49
Total comprehensive loss													(718)
Common Stock issued	5		-		-		38						38
Stock-based compensation expense	-		-		-		57		-		-		57
Dissolution of subsidiary	-		-		-		-		2		-		2
Balance,
September 30, 2007	4,587	$	-	$	46	$	39,904	$	(10,027)	$	9	$	29,932

	For three months ended June 30, 2006
	(dollars in thousands)
	Community Banking		Main Street		Trans-Community		Eliminations		Consolidated
Net interest income (expense)	$	2,212	$	-	$	115	$	1	$	2,328
Provision for loan losses		(92)		-		-		-		(92)
Noninterest income		288		-		112		(101)		299
Noninterest expense		(1,569)		-		(718)		115		(2,172)
(Loss) income from subsidiaries		-		-		506		(506)		-
Net (loss) income from continuing operations		839		-		15		(491)		363
Net loss from discontinued operations		-		(333)		-		-		(333)
Net (loss) income	$	839	$	(333)	$	15	$	(491)	$	30
Total Assets	$	187,498	$	355		30,531	$	(20,920)	$	197,464

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

	For six months ended June 30, 2007
	(dollars in thousands)
	Community Banking		Main Street		Trans-Community		Eliminations		Consolidated
Net interest income (expense)	$	5,127	$	-	$	(9)	$	-	$	5,118
Provision for loan losses		(512)		-		-		-		(512)
Noninterest income		561		-		1,405		(1,403)		563
Noninterest expense		(5,771)		-		(2,138)		2,211		(5,698)
(Loss) income from subsidiaries		-		-		(672)		672		-
Net (loss) income from continuing operations		(595)		-		(1,414)		1,480		(529)
Net loss from discontinued operations		-		(77)		-		-		(77)
Net (loss) income	$	(595)	$	(77)	$	(1,414)	$	1,480	$	(606)
Total Assets	$	214,209	$	-	$	30,084	$	(29,572)	$	214,721

	For six months ended June 30, 2006
	(dollars in thousands)
	Community Banking		Main Street		Trans-Community		Eliminations		Consolidated
Net interest income (expense)	$	4,231	$		$	226	$	-	$	4,457
Provision for loan losses		(144)				-		-		(144)
Noninterest income		504				236		(204)		536
Noninterest expense		(3,076)				(1,608)		233		(4,451)
(Loss) income from subsidiaries		-		-		1,023		(1,023)		-
Net (loss) income from continuing operations		1,515		-		(123)		(994)		398
Net loss from discontinued operations		-		(492)		-		-		(492)
Net (loss) income	$	1,515	$	(492)	$	(123)	$	(994)	$	(94)
Total Assets	$	187,498	$	355	$	30,531	$	(20,920)	$	197,464

TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

11CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

~~NOTE~~FOR ~~7 Secured~~THE ~~Borrowings:~~NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER, 2007 AND 2006

As of June 30, 2007, there were no secured borrowings. Secured borrowings at June 30, 2006 resulted from loan participations identified in August 2006 as being not properly accounted for during 2005. Additional information with respect to these borrowings was included in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007. (unaudited)

~~NOTE~~(dollars ~~8 Capital:~~and shares in thousands)

TransCommunity’s consolidated regulatory capital levels are displayed in the following table:


	For the nine months ended
	September 30, 2007		September 30, 2006
Operating activities:
Net (loss) income	$	(767)	$	4
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Provision for loan losses		1,134		346
Amortization of security premiums and accretion of discounts, net		(14)		18
Depreciation		419		414
Stock-based compensation expense		57		27
Loss on disposition of property		-		(7)
(Increase) Decrease in other assets		(498)		360
Increase in interest payable		116		205
Increase (Decrease) accrued expenses and other liabilities		134		(75)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities		581		1,292

Investing activities:
Purchase of securities held to maturity		(6,000)		(43,000)
Purchase of securities available for sale		(18,522)		(13,250)
Proceeds from maturities of securities held to maturity		21,025		52,000
Proceeds from maturities of securities available for sale		21,863		3,000
Purchase of other investments		(42)		(121)
Net increase in loans		(38,122)		(16,585)
Purchase of premises and equipment		(774)		(196)
Net cash used in investing activities		(20,572)		(18,152)

Financing activities:
Net (decrease) increase in federal funds purchased		(1,517)		854
Proceeds from stock options exercised		38		-
Net (decrease) increase in note payable		(500)		475
Net decrease in secured borrowings		-		(1,435)
Net decrease in noninterest bearing and interest bearing demand deposits		(1,923)		(6,363)
Net increase (decrease) in savings deposits		879		(282)
Net increase in time deposits		28,035		20,378
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		25,012		13,627

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		5,021		(3,233)

Cash and cash equivalents:
Beginning of the period		5,091		16,816
End of the period	$	10,112	$	13,583
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	4,650	$	3,387

	June 30, 2007		December 31, 2006
	(in thousands)
Tier 1 Leverage Capital Ratio
Amount	$	30,061	$	30,457
Actual Ratio		14.74%		15.86%
Minimum Capital Requirement		4.00%		4.00%
Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio
Amount	$	30,061	$	30,457
Actual Ratio		15.26%		17.16%
Minimum Capital Requirement		4.00%		4.00%
Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio
Amount	$	32,102	$	32,522
Actual Ratio		16.30%		18.32%
Minimum Capital Requirement		8.00%		8.00%
Capital ratios:
Average equity to average assets		14.96%		15.79%
Leverage ratio		14.74%		15.86%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio		15.26%		17.16%
Total risk-based capital ratio		16.30%		18.32%

See accompanying notes to unaudited consolidated financial statements.

~~NOTE 9 Litigation:~~6

InTRANSCOMMUNITY ~~the~~FINANCIAL ~~ordinary course of operations, TransCommunity and its subsidiaries may be parties to various legal proceedings. The following matters involve pending or potential claims:~~CORPORATION

~~Minter~~NOTES ~~Lawsuit. On~~TO ~~November~~CONSOLIDATED 2,FINANCIAL ~~2006,~~STATEMENTS James L. Minter filed a lawsuit against the Company and William C. Wiley, the former Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, in the Circuit Court of the County of Powhatan in Virginia. The suit arises out of the Bank’s purchase of Main Street Mortgage and Investment Corporation in early 2001. Minter alleges that in late 2000 Wiley withheld information concerning the value of Main Street Mortgage from the Bank’s board of directors and that the Bank would not have acquired Main Street Mortgage if the valuation had been provided to the Bank’s board. Minter’s suit claims that the Company aided and abetted and conspired with Wiley in his misrepresentation of Main Street Mortgage’s value. Minter’s suit also alleges that the December 2005 separation agreement between the Company and Wiley improperly released claims the Company had against Wiley arising out of Wiley’s alleged concealment of the Main Street Mortgage valuation from the Bank’s board in late 2000. (Unaudited)

12NOTE 1

~~Minter~~Principles ~~seeks~~of ~~unspecified~~Consolidation ~~rescissionary~~ and ~~compensatory~~Basis ~~damages, unspecified treble damages and punitive damages~~ of ~~$350,000 against each defendant, jointly and severally and with interest. Minter also seeks to recover his attorneys’ fees.~~Presentation:

The ~~Company~~accompanying ~~believes~~unaudited ~~that~~consolidated ~~insofar~~financial asstatements itinclude ~~concerns~~the accounts of TransCommunity Financial Corporation (“TransCommunity” or the “Company”) and its consolidated subsidiary TransCommunity Bank, ~~Minter’s~~N.A., ~~suit~~which isincludes ~~without~~Main ~~merit~~Street Mortgage and Investment Corporation (“Main Street Mortgage”), a former wholly-owned subsidiary that discontinued operations in December 2006. All significant intercompany transactions and balances associated with consolidated subsidiaries have been eliminated.

The ~~Company~~consolidated ~~moved~~financial ~~for~~statements aof ~~dismissal~~TransCommunity ofconform to accounting principles generally accepted in the ~~lawsuit~~United States of America, ~~brought~~to ~~claims~~general ~~against~~industry ~~Minter~~practices, and the instructions for ~~breach~~Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X. In the opinion of ~~fiduciary~~management, ~~duty~~the ~~related~~accompanying tounaudited ~~his~~consolidated ~~use~~financial statements contain all adjustments (consisting of ~~confidential~~only ~~Company~~normal ~~information~~recurring ~~for~~accruals) ~~personal~~necessary ~~gain~~to ~~and~~present ~~removed~~fairly ~~him~~the ~~from~~financial position at September 30, 2007, and the ~~board~~results of operations for the ~~Bank~~three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2007 and 2006. The Consolidated Statement of ~~Powhatan~~Financial Condition at December 31, 2006 was derived from audited financial data. InThe ~~response~~preparation of financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the ~~Company’s~~reported ~~motion~~amounts toof ~~dismiss~~assets and liabilities and contingent assets and liabilities in the ~~lawsuit~~financial statements, and the disclosure of revenue and expense during the reporting periods. The assumptions are based on ~~August~~information 8,available ~~2007,~~as of the ~~court~~date ~~dismissed~~of the ~~two~~financial ~~counts~~statements ~~that~~and ~~Minter~~could ~~had~~differ ~~asserted~~from ~~against~~actual results. The results for the ~~Company~~interim periods are not necessarily indicative of annual performance. The ~~court,~~notes ~~however,~~included ~~permitted~~herein ~~Minter~~should tobe ~~replead~~read in conjunction with the ~~count~~notes to consolidated financial statements included in the audited December 31, 2006 financial statements for TransCommunity, which ~~Minter~~statements ~~alleged~~were ~~that~~ included in the Company’s ~~aided~~Annual ~~and~~Report ~~abetted~~on ~~Wiley~~Form in10-K ~~his~~for ~~allegedly~~the ~~fraudulent~~year ~~conduct. The~~ended ~~deadline~~December ~~for~~31, an2006 ~~amended~~filed ~~complaint on~~with ~~that~~the ~~count~~Securities isand ~~August~~Exchange ~~29,~~Commission ~~2007~~(the “Commission”).

~~Based~~NOTE ~~on the facts presently known, the Company believes it has limited liability exposure arising from this lawsuit.~~2 ~~However, since the case is in the early stages, the Company is unable to evaluate the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome or to estimate the amount or range of potential loss, if any, in this matter.~~

~~NOTE~~Impacts ~~10 Subsequent~~of ~~Events~~Certain Accounting Pronouncements:

~~None~~In September 2006, the FASB released SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurement”, which provides guidance for using fair value to measure assets and liabilities. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The Statement also responds to investors’ requests for more information about the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value and the effect that fair value measurements have on earnings. SFAS No. 157 will apply whenever another standard requires (or permits) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. The standard does not expand the use of fair value to any new circumstances. SFAS No. 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those years. SFAS No. 157 is effective for the Company for years beginning after January 1, 2008, and interim periods within that year. The Company is in the process of evaluating the impact that the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

13In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, "The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities." This Statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected are reported in earnings. This Statement is effective as of the beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company is currently in the process of evaluating the impact that the adoption will have on its consolidated financial position and results of operations.

~~Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations~~ 7

~~The~~NOTE following discussion and analysis and the related financial data present a review of TransCommunity’s consolidated operating results for the three-month and six-month period ended June 30, 2007 and 2006, and consolidated financial condition at June 30, 2007 and December 31, 2006. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in TransCommunity’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the Commission on April 16, 2007, and the consolidated financial statements and notes in this Form 10-Q.3

~~Forward-Looking~~Investment ~~Statements~~Securities:

~~This~~The ~~Quarterly~~carrying ~~Report~~values, onunrealized ~~Form~~gains, ~~10-Q~~unrealized ~~contains~~losses ~~forward-looking~~and ~~statements. Such~~approximate ~~forward-looking~~fair ~~statements~~values ~~are within the meaning~~ of ~~that~~investment ~~term~~securities inat ~~Section 27A~~September ~~of the Securities Act of 1933~~30, as2007 ~~amended~~and ~~(the~~December ~~“Securities Act”)~~31, ~~and~~2006 ~~Section 21E~~are ofshown ~~the~~in ~~Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (~~the ~~“Exchange~~table ~~Act”)~~below. ~~Words~~ ~~and~~As ~~phrases~~of ~~such~~September ~~as: “will likely result~~30,” ~~“expect~~2007,” ~~“will~~18 ~~continue,”~~U.S. ~~“anticipate,”~~Agency ~~“estimate,”~~Securities ~~“project,”~~with ~~“believe,”~~a ~~“intend,”~~carrying ~~“will,”~~value ~~“should,” “would,” “could,” “may,” “can,” “plan,” “target” and similar expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning~~ of ~~the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995~~$13. ~~Forward-looking~~7 ~~statements~~million ~~may~~were ~~include,~~pledged ~~but~~as ~~are~~collateral ~~not~~for ~~limited~~borrowings ~~to,~~and ~~discussions~~public ~~concerning:~~ funds.


Securities Available for Sale
September 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
Gov’t-sponsored enterprises-discount notes*	$	1,000	$	-	$	(1)	$	999
Gov’t-sponsored enterprises-notes*		9,305		23		(13)		9,315
Total Securities Available for Sale	$	10,305	$	23	$	(14)	$	10,314

Projections of revenues, expenses, losses, losses per share, net interest margins, asset growth, loan production, deposit growth, and other performance measures;


Securities Held to Maturity
September 30, 2007
(dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
Gov't-sponsored enterprises-discount notes*	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Gov't-sponsored enterprises-notes*		6,400		-		(44)		6,356
Total Securities Held to Maturity	$	6,400	$	-	$	(44)	$	6,356


Securities Available for Sale
December 31, 2006
(dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
Gov’t-sponsored enterprises-discount notes*	$	7,213	$	-	$	(7)	$	7,206
Gov’t-sponsored enterprises-notes*		6,424		-		(33)		6,391
Total Securities Available for Sale	$	13,637	$	-	$	(40)	$	13,597

Expansion of operations, including de novo banks and branch openings, entrance into new markets, and development of products and services; and


Securities Held to Maturity
December 31, 2006
(dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
Gov't-sponsored enterprises-discount notes*	$	13,008	$	-	$	(12)	$	12,996
Gov't-sponsored enterprises-notes*		8,412		-		(122)		8,290
Total Securities Held to Maturity	$	21,420	$	-	$	(134)	$	21,286

*FHLB

·8

~~Discussions~~Investments onin ~~the~~an ~~outlook~~unrealized ofloss ~~the~~position ~~economy,~~that ~~competition,~~are ~~regulation,~~considered ~~taxation~~temporarily impaired at September 30, ~~company~~2007 ~~strategies~~and December 31, ~~subsidiaries~~2006, ~~investment~~segregated ~~risk~~between investments sustaining unrealized losses for periods less than twelve months and ~~policies.~~twelve months or greater, are displayed in the following tables:

Actual results or performance could differ from those implied or contemplated by forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including, among others: general business, regulatory action or inaction, economic and market conditions, fiscal and monetary policies, war and terrorism, natural disasters, changes in interest rates, deposit flows, loan demand and real estate values; a deterioration in credit quality and/or a reduced demand for credit, competition with other providers of financial products and services; the issuance or redemption of additional Company equity or debt; volatility in the market price of the Company’s common stock; changes in accounting principles, policies or guidelines, changes in laws or regulation; reliance on other companies for products and services; operational or systems risks; and other economic, competitive, servicing capacity, governmental, technological factors affecting the Company’s operations, pricing, products and delivery of services. Information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is as of the dates, and for the periods, indicated. TransCommunity does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such statements, whether as the result of new information, future events or otherwise. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the forward-looking events discussed in or incorporated by reference into this report might not occur.


Securities Available for Sale
September 30, 2007	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
(dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
Description of securities:
Gov't-sponsored enterprises-notes*	$	792	$	(13)	$		$		$	792	$	(13)
Gov't-sponsored enterprises-discount notes*		999		(1)		-		-		999		(1)
Total	$	1,791	$	(14)	$	-	$	-	$	1,791	$	(14)

Significant Accounting Policies


Securities Held to Maturity
September 30, 2007	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
(dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
Description of securities:
Gov’t-sponsored enterprises-notes*	$	6,356	$	(44)	$		$		$	6,356	$	(44)
Gov’t-sponsored enterprises-discount notes*						-		-		-		-
Total	$	6,356	$	(44)	$	-	$	-	$	6,356	$	(44)

TransCommunity’s financial position and results of operations are impacted by management’s application of accounting policies involving judgments made to arrive at the carrying value of certain assets. In implementing its policies, management must make estimates and assumptions about the effect of matters that are inherently less than certain. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates which could materially affect the amounts of TransCommunity’s assets, liabilities, income and expenses. Critical accounting policies applied by TransCommunity include those that relate to the allowance for loan losses. For a more detailed discussion on these critical accounting policies, see “Significant Accounting Policies” on page F-8 of TransCommunity’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.


Securities Available for Sale
December 31, 2006	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
(dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
Description of securities:
Gov’t-sponsored enterprises-notes*	$	4,990	$	(4)	$	1,401	$	(29)	$	6,391	$	(33)
Gov’t-sponsored enterprises-discount notes*		7,206		(7)		-		-		7,206		(7)
Total	$	12,196	$	(11)	$	1,401	$	(29)	$	13,597	$	(40)


Securities Held to Maturity
December 31, 2006	Less than 12 months				12 months or more				Total
(dollars in thousands)	Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss		Fair Value		Unrealized Loss
Description of securities:
Gov't-sponsored enterprises-notes*	$	1,999	$	(1)	$	6,291	$	(121)	$	8,290	$	(122)
Gov't-sponsored enterprises-discount notes*		12,996		(12)		-		-		12,996		(12)
Total	$	14,995	$	(13)	$	6,291	$	(121)	$	21,286	$	(134)

~~Overview~~*Issued by the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)

~~TransCommunity’s~~The ~~results~~September of30, ~~operations~~2007 ~~are~~unrealized ~~dependent~~loss ~~primarily~~was onthe ~~its~~aggregate ~~net~~of ~~interest~~11 ~~income~~U.S. Agency notes, none of which ishad ~~the~~a ~~difference~~continuous ~~between~~loss ~~the~~period ~~interest~~of ~~earned~~more onthan ~~its~~12 ~~assets~~months. The December 31, ~~primarily~~2006 ~~its~~unrealized ~~loan~~loss ~~and~~was ~~securities~~the ~~portfolios,~~aggregate ~~and~~of ~~its~~20 ~~cost~~U.S. ofAgency ~~funds~~notes, of which ~~consists~~11 ofhad ~~the~~a ~~interest~~continuous ~~paid~~loss onperiod ~~its~~of ~~deposits~~more ~~and~~than ~~borrowings~~12 months. ~~TransCommunity’s~~ ~~results~~The ofunrealized ~~operations~~loss ~~are~~positions ~~also~~in ~~affected~~both byyears ~~its~~were ~~provision~~primarily ~~for~~related ~~loan~~to ~~losses~~interest asrate ~~well~~movements as ~~non-interest~~there ~~income~~is ~~and~~minimal ~~non-interest~~credit ~~expenses~~risk exposure in these investments. ~~Non-interest~~All ~~expenses~~securities ~~consist~~are ofinvestment ~~employee~~grade ~~compensation~~or ~~and~~better. No ~~benefits,~~impairment ~~occupancy~~loss ~~and~~has ~~equipment,~~been ~~insurance,~~recognized ~~professional~~on ~~fees,~~these ~~telecommunications~~securities ~~and~~because ~~data~~management ~~processing~~has both the intent and ~~other~~the ~~operating~~ability ~~expenses.~~to hold these securities until maturity or call dates.

In addition to the foregoing, results of TransCommunity’s operations, like those of other financial services companies, are affected by its asset and liability composition, as well as factors beyond its control, such as general economic conditions and the monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government. Lending activities are affected by the demand for commercial and retail financing and are thus influenced by interest rates and other factors affecting the availability of funds. Deposit flows and costs of funds are influenced by yields available on competing investments and by general market rates of interest. 9

InManagement ~~January~~evaluates ~~2007,~~securities ~~the~~for ~~Company’s~~other-than-temporary ~~Board~~impairment ofat ~~Directors~~least ~~voted~~on a quarterly basis and more frequently when economic or market concerns warrant such evaluation. Consideration is given to ~~consolidate~~(1) the ~~charters~~length of ~~its~~time ~~four~~and ~~subsidiary~~the ~~banks. This~~extent ~~charter~~to ~~consolidation~~which ~~process~~the ~~was~~fair ~~completed~~value onhas ~~June~~been ~~29,~~less ~~2007. Costs~~than ~~associated~~cost, ~~with~~(2) the ~~charter~~financial ~~consolidation~~condition ~~process~~and ~~negatively~~near-term ~~impacted~~prospects of the ~~Company~~issuer, and (3) the intent and ability of TransCommunity’s ~~performance~~subsidiary ~~during~~bank ~~both~~to retain its investment in the ~~first~~issuer ~~and~~for ~~second~~a ~~quarter~~period of ~~2007~~time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value.

InNOTE ~~evaluating TransCommunity’s financial condition and operating performance, management focuses on the following:~~4

·Stock Based Compensation:

~~Increasing~~2001 ~~loan~~Stock ~~originations~~Option Plan

·A stock option plan was adopted by the Board of Directors of the Bank of Powhatan on May 8, 2001 (the “2001 Plan”). This 2001 Plan was adopted by TransCommunity effective August 15, 2001 in connection with the reorganization in which the Bank of Powhatan became a subsidiary of TransCommunity. The purpose of the 2001 Plan was to reward employees and directors for services rendered and to foster the success of TransCommunity and its subsidiary by providing incentives to employees and directors that will promote the alignment of their personal financial interest with the long-term financial success of TransCommunity and its subsidiaries and with growth in shareholder value. The 2001 Plan provided that options for up to 330,000 shares of TransCommunity common stock may be issued. Under the 2001 Plan, annual grants of stock options were limited to 10,000 shares for each employee and 7,500 shares for each director. The exercise price may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the shares on the grant date. Unless the Compensation Committee of TransCommunity’s Board of Directors determines otherwise, one-third of a grant becomes vested and exercisable on each of the first three anniversaries of the initial grant date. Each grant becomes fully vested and exercisable in the event of a change in control of TransCommunity. All options are subject to exercise or forfeiture if TransCommunity’s capital falls below its minimum requirements, as determined by its primary regulator, and TransCommunity’s primary regulator so directs. At September 2007, options to acquire 275,275 shares were outstanding, of which 233,275 were exercisable at that date.

~~Increasing~~Effective ~~total~~January ~~and~~1, ~~core~~2006, ~~deposit~~TransCommunity ~~balances~~adopted SFAS No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment,” using the modified prospective transition method. SFAS No. 123R requires companies to calculate compensation expense arising from stock-based compensation based on the respective fair values of awards at grant date.

·A summary of the options granted is shown in the following table:

Maintaining TransCommunity’s history of strong net interest margins


	Nine months ended September 30,
		2007		2006
Outstanding at January 1	$	246,625	$	281,425
Granted		56,000		5,000
Exercised		(5,000)		-
Lapsed		(22,350)		(1,200)
Options outstanding at September 30		275,275		285,225
Options exercisable at September 30		233,275		274,492
Weighted average exercise price	$	9.97	$	9.95
Weighted average remaining contracted life at September 30		55 months		79 months

·The weighted-average grant date fair value of 56,000 options granted under the 2001 Plan during the nine months ended September 30, 2007, was $2.43 per share, which equaled $136,080. The weighted average exercise price of options granted during the nine months ended September 30, 2007, was $8.53 per share.

~~Maintaining~~Options ~~high~~granted ~~credit~~under ~~standards~~the Plan generally expire ten years after the date of grant and ~~low~~are ~~levels~~granted at market value of ~~non-performing~~the ~~assets~~stock on the date of grant. Option terms are determined by the Compensation Committee of TransCommunity’s Board of Directors at the time of the grant. TransCommunity utilizes the Black Scholes model to calculate fair values of options awarded. This model requires assumptions as to expected volatility, dividends, terms and risk free rates.

·10

~~Maintaining~~Assumptions anused ~~adequate~~for ~~loan~~the ~~loss~~periods ~~reserve~~covered herein are outlined in the following table:


	Nine months ended
	September 30, 2007	September 30, 2006
Expected volatility	20%	5%
Expected dividend	0	0
Expected term (years)	5	10
Risk free rate	4.6%	4.6%

~~Managing~~Expected ~~interest~~volatilities ~~rate~~are based on volatility trends of similar entities in the region, as defined by the SNL Mid-Atlantic Bank Index. Expected dividends reflect the experience of TransCommunity’s common stock. Expected terms represent the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant for the appropriate life of each option.

·On May 29, 2007, shareholders approved the TransCommunity Financial Corporation 2007 Equity Compensation Plan. As a result, the Company will not make any more stock option grants under the 2001 Plan.

~~Controlling~~2007 ~~expenses~~Equity Compensation Plan

·On May 29, 2007, the shareholders of TransCommunity approved the TransCommunity Financial Corporation 2007 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The complete text of the 2007 Plan was filed as an exhibit to the Form 10-Q dated June 30, 2007. The following general description of the principal features of the 2007 Plan is qualified in its entirety by reference to such exhibit. Additional information with respect to the 2007 Plan is included in the Company’s proxy statement for its 2007 annual meeting of shareholders, as filed with the Commission on April 23, 2007.

~~Ensuring~~The ~~adequate~~2007 ~~funding~~Plan ~~for~~authorizes ~~ongoing~~the ~~growth~~Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors to grant one or more of the following awards to directors, officers, key employees, consultants and advisors to TransCommunity and its subsidiary who are designated by the Compensation Committee: options; stock appreciation rights; stock awards; performance share awards; incentive awards; and stock units. The Compensation Committee will administer the 2007 Plan.

~~Highlights~~TransCommunity ofis ~~TransCommunity’s~~authorized ~~three-month~~to ~~statement~~issue under the 2007 Plan up to 250,000 shares of ~~operations~~its ~~ended~~common ~~June~~stock. Generally, 30if an award is forfeited, ~~2007~~expires or terminates, asthe ~~compared~~shares allocated to that award under the ~~similar~~2007 ~~statement~~Plan inmay ~~2006,~~be ~~and~~reallocated to new awards under the ~~statement~~2007 Plan. Shares surrendered pursuant to the exercise of ~~financial~~a ~~condition~~stock ~~dated~~option ~~June~~or ~~30,~~other award or in satisfaction of tax withholding requirements under the 2007, asPlan ~~compared~~may also be reallocated to ~~December~~other 31awards. The 2007 Plan provides that if there is a stock split, ~~2006~~stock ~~include~~dividend or other event that affects TransCommunity’s capitalization, appropriate adjustments will be made in the ~~following:~~number of shares that may be issued under the 2007 Plan and in the number of shares and price of all outstanding grants and awards made before such event.

·The 2007 Plan also provides that no award may be granted more than 10 years after the earlier of the date that it is approved by TransCommunity’s shareholders or the date it is adopted by TransCommunity’s Board of Directors, which was February 28, 2007.

~~Net~~The ~~income~~Board of ~~$94~~Directors ~~thousand~~may amend or terminate the 2007 Plan at any time, anprovided that no such amendment will be made without shareholder approval if (i) the amendment would increase the aggregate number of ~~$64~~shares ~~thousand~~of ~~over~~Common Stock that may be issued under the ~~2nd~~2007 ~~quarter~~Plan (other than as permitted under the 2007 Plan), (ii) the amendment changes the class of ~~2006~~individuals eligible to become participants or (iii) such approval is required under any applicable law, rule or regulation.

·11

~~Interest~~On ~~income~~July ~~grew~~25, ~~$775 thousand~~2007, oragreements with market presidents and corporate senior officers were executed for restricted stock awards totaling 22,375 shares under the 2007 Plan.5% The agreements grant fifty percent of the restricted stock on a three year vesting schedule as follows:


Date	Percentage
March 1, 2008	20%
March 1, 2009	20%
March 1, 2010	60%

~~Net~~The ~~interest~~remaining ~~income~~one-half ~~increased~~of bythe ~~$329~~restricted ~~thousand~~stock will be issued March 1, 2010 if corporate pretax income for 2009 equals or 14exceeds $3.1%0 million.

·During the 3rd quarter of 2007, the Company recorded expenses of $23 thousand related to stock based compensation, and $57 thousand for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.

~~Provisions~~NOTE ~~for loan losses decreased $26 thousand, or 28.3%~~5

·Earnings (Losses) Per Share:

~~Assets~~Basic ~~grew~~earnings ~~$17.3~~(losses) ~~million,~~per share (“EPS”) are computed by dividing net income or 8loss by the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period.~~7%,~~ ~~since~~Diluted ~~December~~EPS 31is computed using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, ~~2006~~including the effect of dilutive potential common shares outstanding attributable to stock awards. Reported basic and dilutive earnings per share are the same as the effect on EPS of TransCommunity’s outstanding stock options would be antidilutive.

·NOTE 6

~~Noninterest~~Business ~~expenses increased $608 thousand, or 28%~~ Segments:

~~Highlights~~Currently, ofthe ~~TransCommunity’s~~holding ~~six-month~~company ~~statement~~operates ofas ~~operations~~a ~~ended~~shell ~~June~~company ~~30,~~with ~~2007~~all asoperations ~~compared~~performed toby ~~the~~its ~~same~~subsidiary ~~period~~bank and recorded in ~~2006~~its ~~include~~records. All operations are reported under the ~~following:~~Community Banking segment.

·Previously, TransCommunity had two reportable business segments: “Community Banking” and “TransCommunity” as reported June 30, 2007. The Community Banking segment consisted of the Company’s four subsidiary banks which were consolidated in June 2007, each of which provided loan, deposit, mortgage and investment services to retail and commercial customers in their respective market areas. TransCommunity consisted of the parent company, which wholly owned, the consolidated bank. All operations are now performed within the bank.

~~Yield~~During on2006, ~~earnings~~the ~~assets~~Company ~~increased~~had 85two ~~basis~~additional ~~points~~business segments, “Main Street Mortgage,” which provided a variety of mortgage loan products across the country under the exemption granted as a subsidiary of a nationally-chartered bank, and “Financial Services,” which offered trust, asset management and securities and insurance brokerage services. The activities of both of these business segments were discontinued during 2006. The services previously provided by both of these business segments have been transferred to 8the Community Banking segment.~~49%~~ Segment information previously reported is as follows:

·12

Net interest margin increased 25 basis points to 5.34%


	For three months ended September 30, 2006
	(dollars in thousands)
	Community Banking		Main Street		Trans-Community		Eliminations		Consolidated
Net interest income (expense)	$	2,308	$	(11)	$	117	$	-	$	2,414
Provision for loan losses		(166)		(36)		-		-		(202)
Noninterest income		230		208		103		(102)		439
Noninterest expense		(1,534)		(321)		(817)		119		(2,553)
Income (loss) from subsidiaries		-		-		678		(678)		-
Net income (loss) from continuing operations		838		(160)		81		(661)		98
Net loss from discontinued operations		-		-		-		-		-
Net income (loss)	$	838	$	(160)		81	$	(661)	$	98
Total Assets	$	184,484	$	211	$	30,692	$	(22,005)	$	193,382


	For nine months ended September 30, 2006
	(dollars in thousands)
	Community Banking		Main Street		Trans-Community		Eliminations		Consolidated
Net interest income (expense)	$	6,539	$	(30)	$	343	$	-	$	6,852
Provision for loan losses		(310)		(36)		-		-		(346)
Noninterest income		734		1,773		339		(305)		2,541
Noninterest expense		(4,610)		(2,359)		(2,425)		351		(9,043)
Income (loss) from subsidiaries		-		-		1,701		(1,701)		-
Net income (loss) from continuing operations		2,353		(652)		(42)		(1,655)		4
Net loss from discontinued operations		-		-		-		-		-
Net income (loss)	$	2,353	$	(652)		(42)	$	(1,655)	$	4
Total Assets	$	184,484	$	211	$	30,692	$	(22,005)	$	193,382

~~Provisions~~NOTE ~~for~~7 Secured ~~loan losses increased $368 thousand, or 255%~~Borrowings:

·As of the reported dates, there were no secured borrowings.

~~Noninterest expenses increased $1.2 million, or 28%~~13

15NOTE 8 Capital:

~~Results~~TransCommunity’s ofconsolidated ~~Operations~~regulatory capital levels are displayed in the following table:

For the second quarter ended June 30, 2007, the Company reported profit of $94 thousand. In 2006, net income for the same period was $30 thousand, including losses from discontinued operations of $333 thousand. There were no losses from discontinued operations for the 2nd quarter of 2007. Net income per share, both basic and diluted, was $0.02, comparing favorably to $0.01 over the same period in 2006.


	September 30, 2007		December 31, 2006
	(dollars in thousands)
Tier 1 Leverage Capital Ratio
Amount	$	29,923	$	30,457
Actual Ratio		13.62%		15.86%
Minimum Capital Requirement		4.00%		4.00%
Tier 1 Risk-Based Capital Ratio
Amount	$	29,923	$	30,457
Actual Ratio		13.85%		17.16%
Minimum Capital Requirement		4.00%		4.00%
Total Risk-Based Capital Ratio
Amount	$	32,586	$	32,522
Actual Ratio		15.09%		18.32%
Minimum Capital Requirement		8.00%		8.00%

Capital ratios:

Average equity to average assets		14.41%		15.79%
Leverage ratio		13.62%		15.86%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio		13.85%		17.16%
Total risk-based capital ratio		15.09%		18.32%

~~For~~NOTE the six-month period ended June 30, 2007, net losses of $606 thousand include losses from discontinued operations of $77 thousand. These losses were concentrated in the first quarter of 2007, and are directly attributable to three, one-time events:9

1.Litigation:

~~costs~~In ~~associated~~the ~~with~~ordinary ~~our~~course ~~charter~~of ~~consolidation~~operations, ~~project;~~TransCommunity and its subsidiaries may be parties to various legal proceedings. The following matters involve pending or potential claims:

Minter Lawsuit. On November 2, 2006, James L. Minter filed a lawsuit against the Company and William C. Wiley, the former Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors of the Company, in the Circuit Court of the County of Powhatan in Virginia. The suit arises out of the Bank’s purchase of Main Street Mortgage and Investment Corporation in early 2001. Minter alleges that in late 2000 Wiley withheld information concerning the value of Main Street Mortgage from the Bank’s board of directors and that the Bank would not have acquired Main Street Mortgage if the valuation had been provided to the Bank’s board. Minter’s suit claims that the Company aided and abetted and conspired with Wiley in his misrepresentation of Main Street Mortgage’s value. Minter’s suit also alleges that the December 2005 separation agreement between the Company and Wiley improperly released claims the Company had against Wiley arising out of Wiley’s alleged concealment of the Main Street Mortgage valuation from the Bank’s board in late 2000. Minter seeks unspecified rescissionary and compensatory damages, unspecified treble damages and punitive damages of $350,000 against each defendant, jointly and severally and with interest. Minter also seeks to recover his attorneys’ fees.

~~fees~~The ~~charged~~Company inmoved ~~excess~~for ~~than~~a ~~those~~dismissal ~~originally~~of ~~expected~~the lawsuit, brought claims against Minter for breach of fiduciary duty related to his use of confidential Company information for personal gain and removed him from ~~our~~the ~~external~~board ~~auditors;~~of the Bank of Powhatan. In response to the Company’s motion to dismiss the lawsuit, on August 8, 2007, the court dismissed the two counts that Minter had asserted against the Company. The court, however, permitted Minter to replead the count in which Minter alleged that the Company aided and abetted Wiley in his allegedly fraudulent conduct.

3.14

anMinter ~~unusual~~amended ~~addition~~his tocomplaint, ~~our~~and ~~allowance~~the only claim against the Company is based on the Company's alleged derivative liability for ~~loan~~Wiley's ~~losses~~conduct. The ~~associated~~underlying ~~with~~factual allegations are the ~~dissolution~~same; however, Minter now alleges that the Company is liable for Wiley's conduct because he was acting as an agent of ~~our~~the ~~mortgage~~Company. The ~~banking~~Company ~~affiliate~~has again moved for a dismissal of Minter's claim. A hearing on the Company’s motion is set for December 7, 2007.

~~Net~~The ~~Interest~~Company ~~Income~~believes that, insofar as it concerns the Company, Minter’s suit is without merit.

~~For~~Based on the ~~three~~facts ~~months~~presently ~~ended June 30~~known, ~~2007,~~the ~~net~~Company ~~interest~~believes ~~income~~it ~~totaled~~has ~~$2.7~~limited ~~million,~~liability aexposure ~~$421~~arising ~~thousand,~~from orthis 18lawsuit.1% However, ~~increase~~since ~~over~~the ~~TransCommunity’s~~case ~~performance~~is ~~for~~in the ~~same~~early ~~period~~stages, ~~during~~the ~~2006. When~~Company ~~compared~~is ~~with~~unable to evaluate the ~~previous~~likelihood ~~three~~of ~~month~~an ~~period~~unfavorable ~~ended~~outcome ~~March~~or ~~31,~~to ~~2007,~~estimate ~~net~~the ~~interest~~amount ~~income~~or ~~increased~~range ~~$196~~of ~~thousand~~potential loss, orif 8any, in this matter.~~0%.~~

~~For~~NOTE the six months ended June 30, 2007, net interest income totaled $5.1 million, a $661 thousand, or 14.8%, increase over TransCommunity’s performance for the same period during 2006. Average earning assets for the six-month period ended June 30, 2007 grew 9.9%, to $193.2 million compared to $175.8 million during the same period in 2006. 10

~~The~~Pending net interest margin is the net interest income expressed as a percentage of average earnings assets. For the six month period ended June 30, 2007, the net interest margin increased 25 basis points from the same period in 2006, to 5.34% from 5.09%. The increase in net interest margin is attributable to benefits derived from an increase on yields of earning assets of 85 basis points to 8.49%, while the cost of interest bearing liabilities increased 70 basis points, from 3.32% to 4.02%. Merger:

~~Average~~On ~~loans~~September ~~outstanding~~5, ~~increased~~2007, ~~$28.8~~the ~~million,~~Company orentered ~~21.4%,~~into toan ~~$163.5~~Agreement ~~million~~and ~~coupled~~Plan of Merger with aCommunity 6Bankers Acquisition Corp.2% ~~increase~~(“CBAC”). The inMerger ~~yield~~Agreement onsets ~~average~~forth ~~loans~~the toterms ~~9.14%~~and ~~for~~conditions of CBAC’s acquisition of the ~~six~~Company ~~month~~through ~~period~~the ~~ended~~merger ~~June~~of ~~30,~~the ~~2007,~~Company ~~compared~~with toand ainto ~~yield~~CBAC. TransCommunity ofBank, 8N.~~61%~~A., ~~for~~a wholly-owned subsidiary of the ~~same~~Company, ~~period~~will ~~during~~become ~~2006.~~a wholly-owned subsidiary of CBAC in the Merger.

~~For~~Under the ~~six~~terms ~~month~~of ~~period~~the ~~ended~~Merger ~~June~~Agreement, 30CBAC will issue to the shareholders of the Company, ~~2007~~for each share of the Company’s common stock that they own, ~~loan~~ 1.4200 ~~income~~shares of CBAC’s common stock (the “Exchange Ratio”), subject to adjustment as described below. If the daily average closing price for CBAC’s common stock for the 20 consecutive days of trading in such stock ending five days before the closing date is less than $7.442, ~~million~~CBAC ~~increased~~will ~~approximately~~increase ~~28.9%~~the ~~from~~Exchange Ratio to the quotient obtained by dividing $510.75364 ~~million~~by ~~during~~such ~~the~~daily ~~same~~average ~~period~~closing inprice . There ~~2006~~will be no adjustment if such daily average closing price is $7.42 or greater .

~~Management~~In ~~believes~~addition, ~~that~~at the ~~overall~~effective ~~outlook~~time inof ~~its~~the ~~net~~Merger, ~~interest~~each ~~income~~outstanding isoption ~~positive,~~to ~~although~~purchase shares of the Company’s ~~expects~~common tostock ~~experience~~under ~~higher~~any ~~deposit~~of ~~costs~~the inCompany’s ~~future~~stock ~~periods.~~plans ~~Management~~shall ~~expects~~vest ~~commercial~~pursuant ~~loans~~ to ~~continue~~its toterms ~~grow~~and ~~because~~shall ofbe ~~the~~converted ~~focus~~into ~~placed~~an onoption ~~loan~~to ~~growth~~acquire ~~throughout~~ the ~~Company. Loan-related~~number ~~earning~~of ~~assets~~shares ~~tend~~of toCBAC’s ~~have~~common astock ~~higher~~equal ~~spread~~to ~~than~~the ~~those~~number ~~earned~~of inshares of the Company’s ~~investment~~common ~~portfolio. TransCommunity’s~~stock ~~consolidated~~underlying ~~net~~the ~~interest~~option ~~margin~~multiplied ~~compares~~by ~~favorably with~~ the ~~experience~~Exchange ofRatio. The ~~many~~exercise ~~other~~price ~~commercial~~of ~~banks~~each inoption ~~its~~will ~~market~~be ~~area~~adjusted accordingly.

The ~~following~~Merger ~~table~~Agreement ~~details~~also provides for the ~~net~~headquarters ~~interest~~of ~~income~~the ~~calculations~~resulting ~~for~~company to be located at the headquarters of the Company. Following the consummation of the Merger, the Board of Directors of CBAC will consist of 10 directors, four of whom will be nominated by CBAC and six~~-month~~ ~~periods~~of ~~ended~~whom ~~June~~will 30be nominated by the Company. In addition, ~~2007~~the chief executive officer and ~~2006~~chief financial officer of the Company will take those positions with CBAC, and the chief executive officer of CBAC will become its chief strategic officer.

16Consummation of the Merger is subject to a number of customary conditions including the approval of the Merger by the shareholders of each of the Company and CBAC and the receipt of all required regulatory approvals. The Merger is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2007.

~~TRANSCOMMUNITY~~A ~~FINANCIAL~~copy ~~CORPORATION~~of the Merger Agreement and related documents can be found in the Form 8-K filed September 6, 2007.

~~NET~~Note ~~INTEREST~~11 ~~MARGIN~~Subsequent ~~ANALYSIS~~Events:

~~AVERAGE BALANCE SHEETS~~None

~~FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2007 AND 2006~~15

~~(in~~ITEM ~~thousand dollars)~~2.

				2007						2006
	Average		Interest		Average		Average		Interest		Average
	Balance		Income/		Rates		Balance		Income/		Rates
	Sheet		Expense		Earned/Paid		Sheet		Expense		Earned/Paid
ASSETS:
Loans, including fees (1)	$	163,333	$	7,407	9.14	%	$	134,549	$	5,745	8.61	%
Federal funds sold		13,014		333	5.16			23,674		547	4.66
Investments		16,829		393	4.71			17,616		373	4.27
Total earning assets		193,176		8,133	8.49			175,839		6,665	7.64
Allowance for loan losses		(2,007)						(1,719)
Non-earning assets		12,718						13,049
Total assets	$	203,887					$	187,169
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Deposits:
Demand -interest bearing	$	36,777	$	343	1.88	%	$	37,706	$	287	1.53	%
Savings		9,815		75	1.54			10,084		78	1.56
Time deposits		104,254		2,575	4.98			77,673		1,549	4.02
Total deposits		150,846		2,993	4.00			125,463		1,914	3.08
Other borrowed Funds		583		22	7.61			9,784		313	6.46
Total interest-bearing liabilities		151,429		3,015	4.02			135,247		2,227	3.32
Non-interest bearing deposits		21,087						20,530
Other liabilities		860						951
Total liabilities		173,376						156,728
Stockholders' equity		30,511						30,441
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	203,887					$	187,169
Net interest earnings			$	5,118					$	4,438
Interest spread					4.47	%					4.32	%
Net interest margin					5.34	%					5.09	%

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

~~(1)~~The ~~Loan~~following discussion and ~~fee~~analysis ~~income~~and the related financial data present a review of TransCommunity’s consolidated operating results for the three-month and nine-month period ended September 30, 2007 and 2006, ~~includes~~and ~~amounts~~consolidated ~~derived~~financial ~~from~~condition ~~our~~at ~~discontinued~~September ~~operations~~30, 2007 and December 31, 2006. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contained in TransCommunity’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 filed with the Commission on April 16, 2007, and the consolidated financial statements and notes in this Form 10-Q.

~~Provision~~Forward-Looking ~~for Loan Losses~~ Statements

~~For~~This ~~the~~Quarterly ~~six~~Report on Form 10-~~month~~Q ~~period~~contains ~~ended~~forward-looking ~~June~~statements. Such ~~30,~~forward-looking ~~2007,~~statements are within the ~~provision~~meaning ~~for~~of ~~loan~~that ~~losses~~term ~~was~~in ~~$512~~Section 27A ~~thousand,~~of anthe ~~increase~~Securities Act of ~~$368~~1933, ~~thousand~~as ~~over~~amended (the ~~same~~“Securities ~~period~~Act”), inand ~~2006~~Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). AtWords ~~June~~and 30phrases such as: “will likely result,” ~~2007~~“expect,” ~~nonperforming~~“will ~~assets~~continue,” ~~totaled~~“anticipate,” ~~$543~~“estimate,” ~~thousand~~“project,” ~~versus~~“believe,” ~~$267~~“intend,” ~~thousand~~“will,” at“should,” ~~June~~“would,” 30“could,” ~~2006~~“may,” “can,” “plan,” “target” and similar expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, discussions concerning:

However, on a year to date basis, asset quality improved since December 31, 2006, when nonperforming assets equaled $961 thousand. There is no Other Real Estate Owned. Net charge-offs for the year to date period ended June 30, 2007 amounted to $536 thousand, versus $25 thousand for the same prior period. The charge-offs and provisions were experienced during the first quarter and are due primarily to loans related to the discontinued operations of Main Street Mortgage. For the three-month period ended June 30, 2007, recoveries exceeded charge-offs by $2 thousand, versus $37 thousand during the same period in 2006. Management believes the overall credit quality of the portfolio is sound based on the risk inherent in the loan portfolio.·

17Projections of revenues, expenses, losses, losses per share, net interest margins, asset growth, loan production, deposit growth, and other performance measures;

The allowance for loan losses is evaluated continually by management and is based on management’s review of the probability of collection, industry historical experience, the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, credit concentrations, adverse conditions that may effect a borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. An adequate allowance relative to the quality of the loan portfolio sufficient to meet anticipated future loan losses is calculated using appropriate risk factors depending on the type of borrower and whether the loan is secured or unsecured. Loans that are classified adversely are assigned a loss reserve based on their risk rating and liquidation analysis based on present value of estimated cash flow and/or collateral. Unclassified loans are assigned a collective pool loan loss percentage based on historical peer group data in the absence of internal company loss history. As the Company’s loan portfolio seasons, the factors will be adjusted to reflect actual loss experience. The allowance for loan loss is subjective in the absence of actual, material loss data and, as such, requires estimates that are susceptible to periodic revision as conditions change.·

~~Noninterest~~Expansion ~~Income~~of operations, including de novo banks and branch openings, entrance into new markets, and development of products and services; and

During the three months ended June 30, 2007, bank service charges and other fees of $283 thousand decreased slightly from $299 thousand reported for the same period in 2006. On a year to date basis, noninterest income totaled $563 thousand for the six months ended June 30, 2007, an increase of 5% from $536 thousand for the same period in 2006. The overall increase in noninterest income is attributable principally to higher customer service fees, particularly those associated with broker fees and commissions. ·

~~Noninterest~~Discussions ~~Expense~~on the outlook of the economy, competition, regulation, taxation, company strategies, subsidiaries, investment risk and policies.

~~Noninterest~~Actual ~~expense~~results ~~for~~or ~~the~~performance ~~six~~could ~~month~~differ ~~period~~from ~~ended~~those ~~June~~implied ~~30,~~or ~~2007~~contemplated ~~increased~~by $1forward-looking statements.2 Forward-looking ~~million~~statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties, including, among others: general business, regulatory action or ~~28%~~inaction, aseconomic ~~compared~~and market conditions, fiscal and monetary policies, war and terrorism, natural disasters, changes in interest rates, deposit flows, loan demand and real estate values; a deterioration in credit quality and/or a reduced demand for credit, competition with other providers of financial products and services; the ~~same~~issuance ~~period~~or redemption of additional Company equity or debt; volatility in the ~~prior~~market ~~year. Personnel~~price ~~costs~~of the Company’s common stock; changes in accounting principles, ~~which~~policies ~~represent~~or 46guidelines, changes in laws or regulation; reliance on other companies for products and services; operational or systems risks; and other economic, competitive, servicing capacity, governmental, technological factors affecting the Company’s operations, pricing, products and delivery of services.6% Information in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is as of ~~total~~the ~~noninterest~~dates, ~~expense~~and for the periods, ~~were~~indicated. TransCommunity updoes ~~$334~~not ~~thousand~~undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to publicly update or ~~14.4%~~revise ~~when~~any ~~compared~~forward-looking statements to reflect the ~~same~~occurrence ~~period~~of inanticipated ~~2006,~~or ~~due~~unanticipated ~~primarily~~events toor circumstances after the ~~opening~~date of ~~Bank~~such statements, whether as the result of ~~Rockbridge~~new ininformation, ~~December~~future ~~2006~~events or otherwise. ~~The~~ ~~remaining~~In ~~increase~~light isof ~~attributable~~these torisks, ~~costs~~uncertainties ~~associated~~and ~~with~~assumptions, ~~our~~the ~~charter~~forward-looking ~~consolidation~~events ~~efforts~~discussed ~~and~~in ~~higher~~or ~~than~~incorporated ~~expected~~by ~~external~~reference ~~auditor~~into ~~fees~~this report might not occur.

~~Segment~~Significant ~~Information~~Accounting Policies

~~For~~TransCommunity’s ~~the~~financial ~~three~~position ~~months~~and ~~ended~~results ~~June~~of ~~30,~~operations ~~2007,~~are ~~net~~impacted ~~losses~~by ~~from~~management’s ~~continuing~~application ~~operations~~of ~~for~~accounting policies involving judgments made to arrive at the ~~Community~~carrying ~~Banking~~value ~~segment~~of ~~were~~certain ~~$202~~assets. In ~~thousand~~implementing its policies, amanagement ~~decrease~~must make estimates and assumptions about the effect of ~~approximately~~matters ~~124%~~that are inherently less than certain. Actual results could differ significantly from ~~income~~these ofestimates ~~$839~~which ~~thousand~~could ~~during~~materially affect the ~~same~~amounts ~~period~~ of ~~2006. Net~~TransCommunity’s ~~interest~~assets, liabilities, income ~~for~~and ~~the~~expenses. Critical ~~Community~~accounting ~~Banking~~policies ~~segment~~applied ~~increased~~ by ~~$444~~TransCommunity ~~thousand,~~include orthose ~~20.1%,~~that relate to $2the allowance for loan losses.7 For ~~million~~a inmore ~~the~~detailed ~~first~~discussion ~~six~~on ~~months~~these critical accounting policies, see “Significant Accounting Policies” on page F-8 of ~~2007~~TransCommunity’s asAnnual ~~compared~~Report toon Form 10-K for the ~~same~~year ~~period~~ended ofDecember 31, 2006.

For the three months ended June 30, 2007, net losses from Holding Company Operations were $228 thousand, a decrease from the $15 thousand income recorded for the same period one year ago. The most notable decline in periodic performance is related to income derived from subsidiaries, which now consists solely of the Community Banking segment. 16

For the six months ended June 30, 2007, net losses from continuing operations for the Community Banking segment were $595 thousand, a decrease of $2.1 million, or 139%, from income of $1.5 million during the same period of 2006. Net interest income for the Community Banking segment increased by $896 thousand, or 21.2%, to $5.1 million in the first six months of 2007 as compared to the same period of 2006.Overview

~~For~~TransCommunity’s ~~the~~results ~~six~~of ~~months~~operations ~~ended~~are ~~June~~dependent 30primarily on its net interest income, ~~2007~~which is the difference between the interest earned on its assets, ~~net~~primarily ~~losses~~its ~~from~~loan ~~Holding~~and ~~Company~~securities ~~Operations~~portfolios, ~~were~~and ~~$1.4~~its ~~million~~cost of funds, anwhich ~~increase~~consists ~~over~~of the ~~$123~~interest ~~thousand~~paid ~~loss~~on ~~recorded~~its deposits and borrowings. TransCommunity’s results of operations are also affected by its provision for ~~the~~loan ~~same~~losses ~~period~~as ~~one~~well ~~year~~as ~~ago~~non-interest income and non-interest expenses. ~~Most~~ Non-interest expenses consist of ~~the~~employee ~~difference~~compensation isand ~~attributable~~benefits, tooccupancy ~~the~~and ~~aforementioned~~equipment, ~~banking~~insurance, ~~sector~~professional ~~performance~~fees, ~~coupled~~telecommunications ~~with~~and ~~charter~~data ~~consolidations~~processing ~~costs~~and other operating expenses.

~~The~~In ~~Company~~addition ~~had~~to ~~two~~the ~~additional~~foregoing, ~~segments~~results inof ~~2006~~TransCommunity’s ~~that~~operations, ~~were~~like ~~discontinued~~those of other financial services companies, are affected by ~~year~~its ~~end~~asset and liability composition, as well as factors beyond its control, such as general economic conditions and the monetary and fiscal policies of the federal government. Lending activities are affected by the demand for commercial and retail financing and are thus influenced by interest rates and other factors affecting the availability of funds. Deposit flows and costs of funds are influenced by yields available on competing investments and by general market rates of interest.

~~Financial~~In ~~Condition~~January 2007, the Company’s Board of Directors voted to consolidate the charters of its four subsidiary banks. This charter consolidation process was completed on June 29, 2007. In addition, a system conversion with our core processor was successfully completed in August 2007. Costs associated with the charter consolidation process negatively impacted the Company’s performance during the first three quarters of 2007. As we operate under a consolidated charter with a converted system, we expect overhead costs to decline.

OnIn ~~June~~evaluating ~~30, 2007,~~ TransCommunity’s ~~had~~financial ~~total~~condition ~~assets~~and ofoperating ~~$214.7 million~~performance, upmanagement ~~8.2%~~focuses ~~from~~on ~~$198.4~~the ~~million at December 31, 2006. On June 30, 2007, loans totaled $175.1 million, an increase of $23.7 million since December 31, 2006.~~ following:

18·

~~Loans~~Increasing totaled $175.1 million and $143 million at June 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. This represents growth of $32.1 million, or an increase of 22.4%. Despite increased competition, the Company’s banks continued to experience strong loan demand, particularly with construction-related loans. However, TransCommunity remains focused on maintaining its pricing discipline and strong asset quality, and adhering to its conservative underwriting standards. The amounts reported for June 2006 included $9.7 million of participated balances. originations

During the first six months of 2007, the Company’s average cost of interest-bearing deposits increased to 4.00%, up from 3.08% during the first six months of 2006. Average interest-bearing deposits increased $25.3 million, from $125.5 million during the first six months of 2006 to $150.8 million during the same period in 2007. Total deposits increased $18.8 million, or 11.4%, to $183.8 million at June 30, 2007 from $165.0 million at December 31, 2006. Noninterest-bearing deposits increased $2.2 million, or 10.7% from the amount at December 31, 2006. Management views these deposits as a key source for funding the loan growth. As traditional deposits become more difficult to obtain, alternative funding sources will likely result in relatively higher costing funding sources. ·

AtIncreasing ~~June~~core ~~30,~~deposit 2007, the Company’s capital position remained strong with an average equity-to-average assets ratio of 14.96%. TransCommunity had a leverage ratio of 14.74%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 15.26% and a total risk-based capital ratio of 16.30%. At June 30, 2007, the book value of the Company’s common stock was $6.55 per share.balances

~~Income Taxes~~·

NoPreserving ~~income tax provision has been recorded since, at this time, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that~~ TransCommunity’s ~~will~~history ~~produce~~of ~~taxable~~strong ~~income~~net ininterest ~~the~~margins future which cannot be offset by loss carryforwards from the current and prior periods. However, the Company may owe income taxes in the future, including those as determined by the alternate minimum tax (AMT) system. Income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2006, equaled $15 thousand using AMT calculations, which is available as a credit to reduce the regular tax liability in future years.

~~Loans~~·

~~Total~~Retaining ~~loans~~high ~~increased~~credit ~~$23.7~~standards ~~million~~and ~~during~~low ~~the~~levels ~~six months~~ of ~~2007~~non-performing toassets ~~$175.1 million.~~

~~Loans by type are shown in the following schedule:~~·

	June 30,		December 31,
(dollars in thousands)	2007		2006
Real estate:
Construction	$	35,953	$	21,348
Residential		32,013		29,007
Commercial		62,947		60,571
Commercial, industrial and agricultural		34,906		31,284
Consumer and installment		8,798		8,725
All other		446		464
Total loans	$	175,063	$	151,399

Maintaining an adequate loan loss reserve

~~Allocation of the Allowance for Loan Losses~~·

~~The~~Managing ~~allowance~~interest ~~for~~rate loan losses consists of an allocated component and an unallocated component. The allocated component of the allowance for loan losses reflects expected losses resulting from analyses developed through specific credit allocations for individual loans. The unallocated portion of the allowance for loan losses reflects management's estimate of probable inherent but not specifically identified losses within the portfolio. The Company’s allocations for the allowance for loan losses were as follows:risk

19·

	June 30, 2007			December 31, 2006
(dollars in thousands)	Allowance		Percent	Allowance		Percent
Real estate:
Construction	$	419	21%	$	291	14%
Residential		373	19%		396	19%
Commercial		734	34%		826	40%
Commercial, industrial and agricultural		407	20%		427	21%
Consumer and installment		103	5%		119	6%
All other		5	1%		6	0%
Total	$	2,041	100%	$	2,065	100%

Controlling expenses

~~Nonaccrual, Past Due and Restructured Loans~~·

AtEnsuring ~~June~~adequate ~~30,~~funding ~~2007,~~for ~~TransCommunity~~ongoing had $543 thousand in loans classified as non-accrual or past due more than 90 days. At December 31, 2006, TransCommunity had $961 thousand in loans classified as non-accrual or past due more than 90 days. Loans are placed in a non-accrual status when, in the opinion of management, the accrued interest income will not be collected.growth

~~Secured~~Highlights ~~Borrowings~~of TransCommunity’s three-month statement of operations ended September 30, 2007, as compared to the similar statement in 2006, and the statement of financial condition dated September 30, 2007, as compared to December 31, 2006 include the following:

TransCommunity had recorded secured borrowings in past financial statements due to the prior accounting treatment on certain loan participation agreements entered into with third-party financial institutions since the second quarter of 2004. As described above and in Item 3 below, the Company discovered that it had incorrectly accounted for loans subject to these agreements in August 2006. Due to amendments to these agreements so that they could be properly reported under applicable accounting standards, the Company has eliminated the reporting of secured borrowings.·

~~Liquidity~~Net ~~and~~loss ~~Interest~~of ~~Sensitivity~~$161 thousand was reported versus net income of $98 thousand during the 3rd quarter of 2006

At June 30, 2007, TransCommunity had liquid assets of $21.1 million in the form of cash, federal funds sold and available-for-sale investments. Management believes that liquid assets were adequate at June 30, 2007 to meet its customers’ deposit and credit needs. Management anticipates that additional liquidity will be provided by the growth in deposit accounts and loan repayments at TransCommunity Bank. TransCommunity Bank also has the ability to purchase overnight federal funds from a correspondent bank and borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank, if necessary.·

~~Management~~Interest isincome ~~not~~grew ~~aware~~$733 ~~of any trends~~thousand, ~~events~~ or ~~uncertainties that are reasonably likely to have a material impact on TransCommunity's short-term or long-term liquidity~~19. 4%

At June 30, 2007, TransCommunity had a positive cumulative Gap Rate Sensitivity Ratio of 8.33% for the one-year repricing period. A positive one-year Gap Rate Sensitivity Ratio reflects management’s ability to generate loans and investment securities that will mature or reprice faster than interest-bearing deposits in a rising rate environment. Management constantly monitors the interest rate risk and believes that the current position is an acceptable risk for a growing financial services company. ·

~~TransCommunity's~~Net interest ~~sensitivity~~income ~~analysis~~increased isby ~~shown~~$339 onthousand, ~~the~~or ~~following~~14.0% ~~schedule:~~

20·

~~TRANSCOMMUNITY~~Assets ~~FINANCIAL~~grew ~~CORPORATION~~$8.3 million, or 3.9% during the quarter, and $24.6 million, or 12.4%, since December 31, 2006

~~INTEREST SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS~~·

~~JUNE~~Noninterest 30expenses increased $339 thousand, ~~2007~~or 15%

~~(dollars in thousands)~~·

	1 - 365		1 to 5		Over 5
	Days		Years		Years		Total
Uses of Funds:
Loans:
Real estate
Construction	$	34,579	$	1,209	$	165	$	35,953
Residential		19,743		10,050		2,220		32,013
Commercial		31,760		29,802		1,385		62,947
Commercial, industrial and agricultural		18,893		15,427		586		34,906
Consumer and installment		4,742		3,843		213		8,798
All other		395		51		-		446
Total Loans		110,112		60,382		4,569		175,063
Federal funds sold		7,417		-		-		7,417
Investment securities held to maturity, at cost		6,199		4,200		1,000		11,399
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value		4,493		2,775		997		8,265
Total	$	128,221	$	67,357	$	6,566	$	202,144
Sources of Funds:
Demand Deposits -
Interest bearing	$	37,313	$	-	$	-	$	37,313
Savings accounts		9,892		-		-		9,892
Time Deposits > $100,000		27,884		22,559		-		50,443
Time Deposits < $100,000		36,301		27,238		7		63,546
Total interest-bearing deposits		111,390		49,797		7		161,194
Federal funds purchased		-		-		-		-
Borrowings		-		-		-		-
Total	$	111,390	$	49,797	$	7	$	161,194
Discrete Gap	$	16,831	$	17,560	$	6,559	$	40,950
Cumulative Gap	$	16,831	$	34,391	$	40,950
Ratio of Cumulative Gap to Total Earning Assets		8.33%		17.01%		20.26%

Provisions for loan losses increased $455 thousand, or 272%

~~Contractual~~Highlights ~~Obligations~~of TransCommunity’s nine-month statement of operations ended September 30, 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006 include the following:

TransCommunity has entered into certain contractual obligations to make future payments under contracts. The following table summarizes TransCommunity’s contractual obligations as of December 31, 2006:·

	Payments due by period
	Total		Less than One Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More than 5 Years
Contractual Obligations:
Operating lease obligations	$	3,635,231	$	484,415	$	956,126	$	954,920	$	1,239,770
Data processing services		1,462,989		531,996		930,993		-		-
Total	$	5,098,220	$	1,016,411	$	1,887,119	$	954,920	$	1,239,770

Yield on earnings assets improved 76 basis points to 8.53%

21·

AsNet ofinterest ~~June~~margin ~~30,~~grew ~~2007,~~22 ~~there~~basis ~~have~~points ~~been no material changes~~ to ~~the contractual obligations listed above~~5.32%

~~Future Prospects~~·

~~The~~Provisions ~~Company’s loss~~ for ~~the~~loan ~~first~~losses ~~quarter~~increased ~~resulted~~$823 ~~from the confluence of several one-time events which are not likely to recur. In spite of the continuing costs associated with our charter consolidation~~thousand, ~~the~~or Company managed to produce an operating profit in each month of the second quarter. The charter consolidation process is now behind us, however, and will result in reduced operating costs as we move through the remaining months of 2007. 265%

Our new, consolidated bank, and each of its operating divisions is performing well, producing net interest margins that compare favorably with the experience of our competitors. Loan demand in each of our markets remains brisk, and our regulators, our outside loan review firm, and our own internal loan review process all confirm that the quality of our loan portfolio remains strong.·

~~The~~Noninterest ~~Company~~expenses ~~does~~increased ~~business in some of the best markets in the country~~$1. ~~Each~~6 ~~of those markets is led by an experienced banker with significant knowledge of their local market. With operating costs expected to decline~~million, ~~the~~or Company is poised for strong growth in the months ahead. Management continues to seek successful commercial lending officers in its market area to enhance loan growth and resulting interest and fee income.24%

~~Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk~~17

~~Not~~Results ~~Applicable.~~of Operations

~~Item~~For 4Tthe quarter ended September 30, 2007, the Company reported a loss of $161 thousand, resulting from larger-than-anticipated provisions to the loan loss reserve in the amount of $622 thousand. ~~Controls~~ During the third quarter, two commercial loans went into default, each requiring a significant addition to the loss reserve, and ~~Procedures~~the Company made further additions to the reserve following completion of its annual independent loan review. In addition, the loan portfolio grew more rapidly than forecast during the third quarter, requiring further additions to the loan loss reserve.

~~Disclosure~~During ~~Controls~~2006, ~~and~~net ~~Procedures~~income for the same period was $98 thousand, including a net loss from discontinued operations in the amount of $159 thousand.

~~The~~Net ~~Company~~loss isper ~~required~~share tofor ~~maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under~~ the ~~Securities~~quarter ~~Exchange~~ended ~~Act~~September ~~of 1934~~30, ~~as amended (the “Exchange Act”)~~2007, ~~such~~both asbasic ~~this periodic report on Form 10-Q, is recorded, processed, summarized~~ and ~~reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission~~diluted, ~~and~~was that such information is accumulated and communicated to its management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure$0. ~~In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures~~04, ~~the~~compared ~~Company~~with ~~recognizes~~net ~~that~~income ~~any~~per ~~controls and procedures~~share, nobasic ~~matter how well designed~~ and ~~operated~~diluted, ~~can provide only reasonable assurance~~ of ~~achieving~~$0.02 ~~the~~for ~~desired control objectives, and management necessarily is required to apply its judgment in evaluating~~ the ~~cost-benefit~~same ~~relationship~~period ofduring ~~possible controls and procedures~~2006.

WeFor ~~conducted~~the annine-month ~~evaluation~~period ~~under~~ended ~~the~~September ~~supervision~~30, ~~and~~2007, ~~with~~net ~~the~~losses ~~participation~~were of$767 ~~our management~~thousand, including ~~our~~losses ~~Chief~~from ~~Executive~~discontinued ~~Officer~~operations ~~and~~of ~~Chief~~$77 ~~Financial Officer~~thousand, ofcompared ~~the~~with ~~effectiveness~~net ofincome ~~the design and operation~~ of ~~our~~$4 ~~disclosure~~thousand ~~controls~~during ~~and~~the ~~procedures~~same ~~(as~~period ~~defined~~ in ~~Rule~~2006. The ~~13a~~year-~~15(e)~~to-date ~~under~~loss ~~the~~for ~~Exchange Act) as of June 30,~~ 2007. ~~Based~~can ~~upon~~be ~~that~~attributed ~~evaluation,~~to ~~our~~the ~~Chief~~costs ~~Executive~~associated ~~Officer~~with ~~and~~the ~~Chief~~consolidation ~~Financial~~of ~~Officer~~the ~~determined~~Company’s ~~that~~banking charters, asextraordinary afees ~~result~~charged ofby the ~~material~~Company’s ~~weakness~~former ~~described~~external ~~below~~auditors, ~~our~~and ~~disclosure~~larger-than-anticipated ~~controls~~additions ~~and~~to ~~procedures~~the ~~were~~reserve ~~not~~for ~~effective.~~loan losses.

InNet ~~light~~Interest ofIncome the material weakness described below, we performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures to ensure our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

~~Internal~~For ~~Control~~the three months ended September 30, 2007, net interest income totaled $2.8 million, a $339 thousand, or 14.0%, increase over ~~Financial~~TransCommunity’s ~~Reporting~~performance for the same period during 2006. When compared with the previous three-month period ended June 30, 2007, net interest income increased $108 thousand, or 4.1%.

~~Our~~For ~~management~~the isnine ~~responsible~~months ~~for~~ended ~~establishing~~September ~~and~~30, ~~maintaining~~2007, ~~adequate~~net ~~internal~~interest ~~control~~income ~~over~~totaled ~~financial~~$7.9 ~~reporting~~million, ~~(as~~a ~~defined~~$1 inmillion, ~~Rules 13a-15(f)~~or ~~under~~14.6%, ~~the~~increase ~~Exchange~~over ~~Act)~~TransCommunity’s performance for the ~~Company.~~same ~~This~~period ~~system~~during is2006. Average ~~designed~~earning toassets ~~provide~~for ~~reasonable assurance regarding~~ the ~~reliability~~nine-month ofperiod ~~financial~~ended ~~reporting~~September ~~and~~30, ~~the~~2007 ~~preparation~~grew of10.3%, ~~financial~~to ~~statements~~$198.2 ~~for~~million ~~external~~compared ~~purposes~~to in$179.6 ~~accordance~~million ~~with~~during ~~accounting~~the ~~principles~~same ~~generally~~period ~~accepted~~ in ~~the United States~~2006.

The net interest margin is the net interest income expressed as a percentage of average earnings assets. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, the net interest margin increased 22 basis points from the same period in 2006, to 5.32% from 5.10%. The increase in net interest margin is attributable to benefits derived from an increase on yields of earning assets of 76 basis points to 8.53%, while the cost of interest-bearing liabilities increased 62 basis points, from 3.47% to 4.09%.

AsAverage weloans ~~have~~outstanding ~~previously~~increased ~~reported~~$30.9 million, weor ~~have~~22.3%, ~~identified~~to ~~both~~$169.7 amillion ~~material~~coupled ~~weakness~~with ~~and~~ a ~~significant~~5.1% ~~deficiency~~increase in ~~our~~yield ~~internal~~on ~~control~~average ~~over~~loans ~~financial~~to ~~reporting~~9. ~~The~~15% ~~material~~for ~~weakness~~the ~~relates~~nine-month toperiod ~~our~~ended ~~accounting~~September ~~and~~30, ~~documentation for loans participated to third parties~~2007, ~~and~~compared ~~the significant deficiency relates~~ to ~~our~~a ~~accounting~~yield ~~and~~of ~~record generation and maintenance for loan origination costs and for amortizing fees~~8. ~~Additional~~71% ~~information with respect to these matters was included in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q~~ for the same period ~~ended~~during ~~March 31, 2007~~2006.

WeFor ~~have~~the ~~adopted~~nine-month ~~and~~period ~~implemented~~ended ~~measures~~September in30, ~~connection~~2007, ~~with~~loan ~~our~~income ~~ongoing~~of ~~efforts~~$11.6 tomillion ~~improve~~increased ~~our~~approximately ~~internal~~28.2% ~~control~~from ~~processes,~~$9.1 ~~some~~million ofduring ~~which~~the ~~have~~same ~~been~~period ~~enhanced further or implemented~~ in ~~connection with the restatement process~~2006. ~~These measures include the following:~~

·Management believes that the overall outlook for its net interest income is positive, although the Company expects to experience higher deposit costs in future periods. Management expects commercial loans to continue to grow because of the focus placed on loan growth throughout the Company. Loan-related earning assets tend to have a higher spread than those earned in the Company’s investment portfolio. TransCommunity’s consolidated net interest margin compares favorably with other commercial banks in its market area.

WeThe ~~have~~following ~~reviewed~~table ~~and~~details ~~modified~~the ~~certain~~net ~~loan~~interest ~~operating~~income ~~policies~~calculations tofor ~~provide~~the ~~guidance~~nine-month onperiods ~~daily~~ended ~~operations~~September 30, 2007 and 2006.

·18

WeTRANSCOMMUNITY ~~have~~FINANCIAL ~~provided additional training to loan personnel.~~CORPORATION

·NET INTEREST MARGIN ANALYSIS

WeAVERAGE ~~hired~~BALANCE ~~a new chief credit officer and centralized the credit administration function.~~SHEETS

~~Additionally,~~FOR onTHE ~~June~~NINE ~~29,~~MONTHS ~~2007,~~ENDED ~~the~~SEPTEMBER ~~Company~~30, ~~consolidated~~2007 ~~its~~AND four bank charters and centralized certain operational areas to provide a clearer segregation of responsibilities in connection with origination and monitoring activities. Centralizing many of the operational functions will help ensure a stronger environment over internal controls.2006

As(dollars a part of the Company’s preparation for compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Company will continue to evaluate the effectiveness of its internal controls and procedures on an ongoing basis and will take further action as appropriate. Section 404 will require the Company’s management to report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. Future remedial measures that we are considering include organizational changes to improve supervision and increased training for operations and accounting personnel. We will continue to develop new policies and procedures and educate and train our employees on our existing policies and procedures in ~~our effort to constantly improve our internal controls and control environment.~~thousands)

We are taking all of these steps in connection with the consolidation of our banks and expect to eliminate the material weakness and significant deficiency when the process is complete.


	2007							2006
	Average Balance Sheet		Interest Income/Expense			Average Rates Earned/Paid		Average Balance Sheet				Interest Income/Expense		Average Rates Earned/Paid
ASSETS:
Loans, including fees (1)	$	169,718		$	11,616		9.15%		$	138,791	$		9,042	8.71%
Federal funds sold		11,946			458		5.13			22,845			826	4.83
Investments		16,502			575		4.66			17,970			576	4.29
Total Earning Assets		198,166			12,649		8.53			179,606			10,444	7.77
Allowance for loan losses		(2,033)								(1,740)
Non-earning assets		12,785								12,684
Total Assets	$	208,918							$	190,550

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Deposits:
Demand -
Interest bearing	$	36,014		$	507		1.88%		$	37,050	$		444	1.60%
Savings		10,036			116		1.55			9,897			115	1.55
Time deposits		108,750			4,094		5.03			81,382			2,549	4.19
Total deposits		154,800			4,717		4.07			128,329			3,108	3.24
Other borrowed Funds		1,006			48		6.43			10,190			484	6.36
Total interest-bearing Liabilities		155,806			4,765		4.09			138,519			3,592	3.47
Non-interest bearing Deposits		22,073								20,843
Other liabilities		938								964
Total liabilities		178,817								160,326
Stockholders' equity		30,101								30,224
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$	208,918							$	190,550
Net interest earnings				$	7,884						$		6,852
Interest spread							4.44%							4.30 %
Net interest margin							5.32%							5.10 %

~~Other~~Provision ~~than~~for asLoan ~~described~~Losses above, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting in the quarter ended June 30, 2007 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

23For the three-month period ended September 30, 2007, the provision for loan losses was $622 thousand, an increase of $455 thousand over the same period in 2006. Large provisions during the third quarter are attributable to strong loan growth coupled with downgraded credits. There were seven commercial loans with deteriorated credit quality that comprised approximately $500 thousand, or 80% of the 3rd quarter provisions. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, the provision for loan losses was approximately $1,134 thousand, an increase of $823 thousand over the same period in 2006. At September 30, 2007, nonperforming assets totaled $1,041 thousand, versus $267 thousand at September 30, 2006.

~~Part II Other Information~~19

~~Item~~Asset 1quality declined slightly since December 31, 2006, when nonperforming assets equaled $961 thousand. ~~Legal~~ There ~~Proceedings~~is no other real estate owned. Net charge-offs for the nine months ended September 30, 2007 amounted to $628 thousand, versus $126 thousand for the same period in 2006. The charge-offs are due primarily to loans related to the discontinued operations of Main Street Mortgage. For the three-month period ended September 30, 2007, net charge-offs equaled $92 thousand, versus $101 thousand during the same period in 2006.

In March, 2007, the ~~ordinary~~Company ~~course~~employed ofits ~~operations~~first chief credit officer. In June 2007, ~~TransCommunity~~all ~~and~~credit ~~its~~administration ~~subsidiary~~functions ~~bank~~were ~~expect~~centralized toas bepart ~~parties~~of tothe ~~various~~consolidation ~~legal~~of ~~proceedings~~the Company’s four bank subsidiaries. AtAs ~~present~~part of the establishment of a centralized credit administration function, ~~there~~management ~~are~~has noengaged ~~pending~~in oran ~~threatened~~in-depth ~~proceedings~~analysis ~~against~~of ~~TransCommunity~~the ortotal ~~its~~loan ~~subsidiary~~portfolio ~~which~~and has made adjustments to individual loan risk ratings as necessary. In addition, ifduring ~~determined~~the ~~adversely~~third quarter, ~~would~~the ~~have~~entire aloan ~~material~~portfolio ~~effect~~was onreviewed as part of the ~~business,~~annual ~~results~~independent loan review by an outside consulting firm. As a result of ~~operations~~this ongoing loan review process, ormanagement ~~financial~~is ~~position~~of the opinion the overall credit quality of ~~TransCommunity~~the orloan ~~its~~portfolio ~~subsidiary~~is sound, and that the allowance for loan losses is adequate.

The ~~Company~~allowance for loan losses is evaluated continually by management and is based on management’s ~~Annual~~review ~~Report~~of onthe ~~Form~~probability ~~10-K~~of ~~for~~collection, industry historical experience, the ~~year~~nature ~~ended~~and ~~December~~volume 31of the loan portfolio, ~~2006~~credit ~~included~~concentrations, ~~disclosure~~adverse conditions that may effect a borrower’s ability to repay, estimated value of any underlying collateral and prevailing economic conditions. An adequate allowance relative to the quality of the loan portfolio sufficient to meet anticipated future loan losses is calculated using appropriate risk factors depending on ~~pending~~the ~~litigation~~type of borrower and whether the loan is secured or unsecured. ~~(See~~Loans ~~also~~that ~~Note~~are 9classified ~~above~~adversely ~~for~~are ~~information~~assigned a loss reserve based on ~~this~~their ~~pending~~risk ~~litigation~~rating and liquidation analysis based on present value of estimated cash flow and/or collateral.) ~~There~~Unclassified ~~have~~loans ~~been~~are noassigned ~~developments~~a ~~that~~collective ~~would~~pool ~~change~~loan loss percentage based on historical peer group data in the absence of internal company loss history. As the Company’s loan portfolio seasons, the factors will be adjusted to reflect actual loss experience. The allowance for loan loss is subjective in the absence of actual, material loss data and, as such, requires estimates that ~~disclosure~~are susceptible to periodic revision as conditions change.

~~Item~~Noninterest ~~1A. Risk Factors~~Income

~~There~~During ~~have~~the ~~been~~three nomonths ~~material~~ended ~~changes~~September in30, ~~the~~2007, ~~risk~~bank ~~factors~~service ~~disclosed~~charges inand other fees of $269 thousand increased 16% from $232 thousand reported for the ~~Company’s~~same ~~Annual~~period ~~Report~~in on2006. On ~~Form~~a 10year-Kto-date basis, noninterest income totaled $832 thousand for the ~~year~~nine months ended ~~December~~September 3130, 2007, an increase of 8.3% from $768 thousand for the same period in 2006. The overall increase in noninterest income is attributable principally to higher customer service fees, including those associated with broker fees and commissions.

~~Item~~Noninterest ~~2. Unregistered~~Expense ~~Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds~~

~~None~~Noninterest expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2007 increased $339 thousand, or 15%, as compared with the same period in 2006. For the nine-month period ended September 30, 2007, noninterest expenses were up by $1.6 million, or 23.7% compared with the same period in 2006.

~~Item~~The ~~3. Defaults~~growth ~~Upon~~in ~~Senior~~noninterest ~~Securities~~expense for both the third quarter and the year-to-date is attributable to the opening of the Bank of Rockbridge in December 2006, and the costs associated with the consolidation of our banking charters in June of 2007.

~~None~~During 2007, noninterest expenses have declined each quarter, from $2,918 thousand in the first quarter, to $2,780 thousand in the second quarter, to $2,573 thousand for the quarter ended September 30, 2007. This favorable trend reflects the impact of the recently completed charter consolidation. The Company expects further decreases in noninterest expenses during the fourth quarter of 2007.

~~Item~~Segment ~~4. Submission~~Information ~~of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders~~

OnThe ~~May~~Company 29had two additional segments in 2006, ~~2007~~which were discontinued by December 31, ~~the~~2006. ~~Company~~Currently, ~~held~~the ~~its~~organization ~~annual~~consists ~~meeting~~solely of ~~shareholders. During~~a ~~the~~bank ~~meeting~~operating under its holding company, ~~shareholders~~which ~~approved~~is ~~the~~essentially ~~following~~a ~~proposals~~shell ~~with~~corporation. Therefore, ~~the~~current ~~following~~segment ~~voting~~information ~~results:~~is not provided.

1.20

~~Election~~Financial of three Class III directors to serve until the 2010 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, one Class II director to serve until the 2009 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and one Class I director to serve until the 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.Condition

	Number of Shares
	For	Withheld
Class III Nominees
Bruce B. Nolte	2,422,055	582,644
John W. Pretlow, Jr.	2,907,780	96,919
John J. Sponski	2,907,030	97,669
Class II Nominee
Christopher G. Miller	2,906,130	98,569
Class I Nominee
Richard W. Bozard	2,905,730	98,969

On September 30, 2007, TransCommunity had total assets of $223 million, up 12.4% from $198.4 million at December 31, 2006. On September 30, 2007, loans totaled $189 million, an increase of $37.6 million since December 31, 2006.

2Loans totaled $189 million and $140.5 million at September 30, 2007 and 2006, respectively. This represents growth of $48.5 million, or an increase of 34.6%. Despite increased competition, the Company’s banks continued to experience strong loan demand, particularly with construction-related loans. However, TransCommunity remains focused on maintaining its pricing discipline and asset quality, and adhering to its conservative underwriting standards.

~~Approval~~During the first nine months of an2007, ~~amendment~~the toCompany’s ~~our~~average ~~Articles~~cost of ~~Incorporation~~interest-bearing liabilities increased to ~~eliminate~~4.09%, up from 3.47% during the ~~current~~first ~~class~~nine ~~structure~~months of ~~our~~2006. Average ~~board:~~interest-bearing liabilities grew $17.3 million, from $138.5 million during the first nine months of 2006 to $155.8 million during the same period in 2007. Total deposits increased $27 million, or 16.4%, to $192 million at September 30, 2007, up from $165 million at December 31, 2006. Noninterest-bearing deposits increased $2.1 million, or 10.4% since December 31, 2006. Management views these deposits as a key source for funding the loan growth. As traditional deposits become more difficult to obtain, alternative funding sources will likely result in relatively higher costs.

Votes
			Broker
For	Against	Abstain	Non-votes
2,870,441	90,304	21,454	-

At September 30, 2007, the Company’s capital position remained strong with an average equity-to-average assets ratio of 14.41%. TransCommunity had a leverage ratio of 13.62%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 13.85% and a total risk-based capital ratio of 15.09%. At September 30, 2007, the book value of the Company’s common stock was $6.53 per share.

24Income Taxes

3No income tax provision has been recorded since, at this time, there is insufficient evidence to conclude that TransCommunity will produce taxable income in the future which cannot be offset by loss carryforwards from the current and prior periods. However, the Company may owe income taxes in the future, including those as determined by the alternate minimum tax (AMT) system. Income taxes for the year ended December 31, 2006, equaled $15 thousand using AMT calculations, which is available as a credit to reduce the regular tax liability in future years.

~~Approval of the TransCommunity Financial Corporation 2007 Equity Compensation Plan:~~ Loans

Votes
			Broker
For	Against	Abstained	Non-votes
2,440,051	142,844	38,554	360,750

Total loans increased $37.6 million during the nine months of 2007 to $189 million.

~~Item~~Loans ~~5. Other~~by ~~Information~~type are shown in the following schedule:

On May 29, 2007, the shareholders of TransCommunity approved the TransCommunity 2007 Equity Compensation Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The complete text of the 2007 Plan is being filed as an exhibit to this report and is incorporated by reference into this Item 5. The following general description of the principal features of the 2007 Plan is qualified in its entirety by reference to such exhibit. Additional information with respect to the 2007 Plan is included in the Company’s proxy statement for its 2007 annual meeting of shareholders, as filed with the Commission on April 23, 2007.


	September 30, 2007		December 31, 2006
(dollars in thousands)
Real estate:
Construction	$	36,702	$	21,348
Residential		36,589		29,007
Commercial		63759		60,571
Commercial, industrial and agricultural		41,760		31,284
Consumer and installment		10,133		8,725
All other		60		464
Total Loans	$	189,003	$	151,399

The 2007 Plan authorizes the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors to grant one or more of the following awards to directors, officers, key employees, consultants and advisors to TransCommunity and its subsidiaries who are designated by the Compensation Committee: options; stock appreciation rights; stock awards; performance share awards; incentive awards; and stock units. The Compensation Committee will administer the 2007 Plan. 21

~~TransCommunity~~Allocation ~~is authorized to issue under the 2007 Plan up to 250,000 shares~~ of ~~its common stock. Generally, if an award is forfeited, expires or terminates,~~ the ~~shares~~Allowance ~~allocated~~for toLoan that award under the 2007 Plan may be reallocated to new awards under the 2007 Plan. Shares surrendered pursuant to the exercise of a stock option or other award or in satisfaction of tax withholding requirements under the 2007 Plan may also be reallocated to other awards. The 2007 Plan provides that if there is a stock split, stock dividend or other event that affects TransCommunity’s capitalization, appropriate adjustments will be made in the number of shares that may be issued under the 2007 Plan and in the number of shares and price of all outstanding grants and awards made before such event.Losses

The ~~2007~~allowance ~~Plan~~for ~~also~~loan ~~provides~~losses ~~that~~consists noof ~~award~~an ~~may~~allocated becomponent ~~granted~~and ~~more~~an ~~than~~unallocated 10component. The ~~years~~allocated ~~after~~component of the ~~earlier~~allowance offor ~~the~~loan ~~date~~losses ~~that~~reflects itexpected islosses ~~approved~~resulting byfrom ~~TransCommunity’s~~analyses ~~shareholders~~developed orthrough specific credit allocations for individual loans. The unallocated portion of the ~~date~~allowance itfor isloan ~~adopted~~losses byreflects ~~TransCommunity’~~management's ~~Board~~estimate of ~~Directors,~~probable ~~which~~inherent ~~was~~but ~~February~~not ~~28,~~specifically ~~2007~~identified losses within the portfolio. The Company’s allocations for the allowance for loan losses were as follows:

The Board of Directors may amend or terminate the 2007 Plan at any time, provided that no such amendment will be made without shareholder approval if (i) the amendment would increase the aggregate number of shares of Common Stock that may be issued under the 2007 Plan (other than as permitted under the 2007 Plan), (ii) the amendment changes the class of individuals eligible to become participants or (iii) such approval is required under any applicable law, rule or regulation.


	September 30, 2007			December 31, 2006
(dollars in thousands)	Allowance		Percent	Allowance		Percent
Real estate:
Construction	$	517	19%	$	291	14%
Residential		516	19%		396	19%
Commercial		898	34%		826	40%
Commercial, industrial and agricultural		581	22%		427	21%
Consumer and installment		143	5%		119	6%
All other		8	1%		6	0%
Total Loans		2,663	100%		2,065	100%

25Nonaccrual, Past Due and Restructured Loans

~~Item~~At 6September 30, 2007, TransCommunity had $1,041 thousand in loans classified as non-accrual or past due more than 90 days. At December 31, 2006, TransCommunity had $961 thousand in loans classified as non-accrual or past due more than 90 days. Loans are placed in a non-accrual status when, in the opinion of management, the accrued interest income will not be collected.

~~Exhibits~~Secured Borrowings

~~The~~TransCommunity ~~following~~had ~~exhibits~~recorded ~~are~~secured ~~filed~~borrowings orin ~~incorporated~~past byfinancial ~~reference~~statements asdue ~~part~~to ofthe ~~this~~prior ~~Form~~accounting 10treatment on certain loan participation agreements entered into with third-Q:party financial institutions since the second quarter of 2004. The Company discovered that it had incorrectly accounted for loans subject to these agreements in August 2006. Due to amendments to these agreements so that they could be properly reported under applicable accounting standards, the Company has eliminated the reporting of secured borrowings.

Exhibit No.	Description of Exhibits
3.1	Articles of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (as restated in electronic format only as of June 13, 2007) (filed herewith)
10.1	TransCommunity Financial Corporation 2007 Equity Compensation Plan (filed herewith)
31.1	Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (filed herewith)
31.2	Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (filed herewith)
32	Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)

Liquidity and Interest Sensitivity

26At September 30, 2007, TransCommunity had liquid assets of $20.4 million in the form of cash, federal funds sold and available-for-sale investments. Management believes that liquid assets were adequate at September 30, 2007 to meet its customers’ deposit and credit needs. Management anticipates that additional liquidity will be provided by the growth in deposit accounts and loan repayments at TransCommunity Bank. TransCommunity Bank also has the ability to purchase overnight federal funds from a correspondent bank and borrow from the Federal Reserve Bank, if necessary.

~~SIGNATURES~~Management is not aware of any trends, events or uncertainties that are reasonably likely to have a material impact on TransCommunity's short-term or long-term liquidity.

~~Pursuant~~At toSeptember ~~the~~30, ~~requirements~~2007, ofTransCommunity ~~the~~had ~~Securities~~a ~~Exchange~~positive ~~Act~~cumulative Gap Rate Sensitivity Ratio of ~~1934,~~0.46% for the ~~registrant~~one-year ~~has~~repricing ~~duly~~period. A ~~caused~~positive ~~this~~one-year ~~report~~Gap Rate Sensitivity Ratio reflects management’s ability to begenerate ~~signed~~loans onand ~~its~~investment ~~behalf~~securities bythat will mature or reprice faster than interest-bearing deposits in a rising rate environment. Management constantly monitors the ~~undersigned~~interest ~~thereunto~~rate ~~duly~~risk ~~authorized~~and believes that the current position is an acceptable risk for a growing financial services company.

	TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
	(Registrant)
Date: August 10, 2007	/s/ Bruce B. Nolte
	Bruce B. Nolte
	Chief Executive Officer
	(principal executive officer)
Date: August 10, 2007	/s/ Patrick J. Tewell
	Patrick J. Tewell
	Chief Financial Officer
	(principal financial and accounting officer)

27TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION

INTEREST SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

SEPTEMBER 30, 2007

(dollars in thousands)

TransCommunity's interest sensitivity analysis is shown on the following schedule:


Uses of Funds:	1-365 Days		1 to 5 Years		Over 5 Years		Total

Loans:
Real estate:
Construction	$	34,265	$	2,274	$	163	$	36,702
Residential		23,864		10,484		2,241		36,589
Commercial		28,745		33,865		1,149		63,759
Commerical, industrial and agricultural		19,785		20,659		1,316		41,760
Consumer installment		5,686		4,276		171		10,133
All other		14		46		--		60
Total Loans		112,359		71,604		5,040		189,003
Federal funds sold		4,061		--		--		4,061
Investment securities held to maturity, at cost		1,200		4,200		1,000		6,400
Investment securities available for sale, at fair value		7,505		1,806		1,003		10,314
Total	$	125,125	$	77,610	$	7,043	$	209,778


Sources of Funds:

Demand Deposits-
Interest bearing		33,802		--		--		33,802
Savings accounts		10,357		--		--		10,357
Time Deposits > $100,000		35,045		19,613		--		54,658
Time Deposits < $100,000		44,949		25,589		34		70,572
Total interest-bearing deposits		124,153		45,202		34		169,389
Federal funds purchased		--		--		--		--
Borrowings		--		--		--		--
Total	$	124,153	$	45,202	$	34	$	169,389
Discrete Gap	$	972	$	32,408	$	7,009	$	40,388
Cumulative Gap	$	972	$	33,380	$	40,388	$
Ratio of Cumulative Gap to Total Earning Assets		0.46%		15.91%		19.25%

Contractual Obligations


	Payments due by Period
	Total		Less than One Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More than 5 Years
Contractual obligations:
Operating lease obligations	$	2,525,093	$	422,012	$	852,022	$	586,667	$	664,392
Data processing services		2,535,000		518,333		1,036,667		980,000		--
Total	$	5,060,093	$	940,345	$	1,888,689	$	1,566,667	$	664,392

On August 9, 2007, the Company executed an agreement for the construction of a new branch office located at 1949 Sandy Hook Road, Goochland, Virginia, 23063. This branch will replace the existing leased facility at Goochland Courthouse. The agreement, which is in the amount of approximately $1.4 million, is a fixed price contract that will not be financed. Monthly payments will be made following a percentage completion method. Completion is expected in the first quarter of 2008, and branch personnel will relocate from the nearby rented space.

Future Prospects

The Company’s loss for the third quarter resulted primarily from seven deteriorated loans that required additional provisions to absorb any potential future loss. Profitability was achieved for a period of time during the 3^rd quarter of 2007, and earnings would have been reported if the higher-than-expected provisions had not been reserved. We successfully consolidated our four bank charters during the 2^nd quarter of 2007, and we completed our system conversion in August 2007. In addition, during the third quarter, a new contract was negotiated with our data processor. Based on the current levels of activity and fee structure, we expect to significantly reduce these costs by at least $400,000 annually.

Our new consolidated bank and each of its operating divisions is performing well and producing net interest margins that compare favorably with the experience of our peers. Loan demand in each of our markets remains brisk, and our regulators, our outside loan review firm, and our own internal loan review process all confirm that the quality of our loan portfolio remains strong.

The Company conducts business in some of the best markets in the country. Each of those markets is led by an experienced banker with significant knowledge of their local market. With operating costs expected to decline, the Company is poised for strong growth in the months ahead. Management continues to seek successful commercial lending officers in its market area to enhance loan growth and resulting interest and fee income.

The planned merger with Community Bankers Acquisition Corporation will provide additional capital which will permit management to consider external expansion on an accelerated basis. The new capital will also support more rapid rates of internal growth. In addition, the recent charter consolidation and system conversion prepares the Company to realize benefits of a streamlined structure. More information related to the proposed merger can be found in Note 10 to the financial statement within Part I, Item 1, and in our Form 8-K filed September 6, 2007.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not Applicable.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company is required to maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), such as this periodic report on Form 10-Q, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to its management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, the Company recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.

We conducted an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of September 30, 2007. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer determined that, as a result of the material weakness described below, our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

In light of the material weakness described below, we performed additional analysis and other post-closing procedures to ensure our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) for the Company. This system is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

As we have previously reported, we have identified both a material weakness and a significant deficiency in our internal control over financial reporting. The material weakness relates to our accounting and documentation for loans participated to third parties, and the significant deficiency relates to our accounting and record generation and maintenance for loan origination costs and for amortizing fees. Additional information with respect to these matters was included in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2007.

We have adopted and implemented measures in connection with our ongoing efforts to improve our internal control processes, some of which have been enhanced further or implemented in connection with the restatement process. These measures include the following:

We have reviewed and modified certain loan operating policies to provide guidance on daily operations.

We have provided additional training to loan personnel.

We hired a new chief credit officer and centralized the credit administration function.

Additionally, on June 29, 2007, the Company consolidated its four bank charters and centralized certain operational areas to provide a clearer segregation of responsibilities in connection with origination and monitoring activities. Centralizing many of the operational functions will help ensure a stronger environment over internal controls. In August 2007, we completed our system conversion as planned.

As a part of the Company’s preparation for compliance with the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Company will continue to evaluate the effectiveness of its internal controls and procedures on an ongoing basis and will take further action as appropriate. Section 404 will require the Company’s management to report on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control structure and procedures for financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. Future remedial measures that we are considering include organizational changes to improve supervision and increased training for operations and accounting personnel. We will continue to develop new policies and procedures and educate and train our employees on our existing policies and procedures in our effort to constantly improve our internal controls and control environment.

We are taking all of these steps in connection with the consolidation of our banks and expect to eliminate the material weakness and significant deficiency when the process is complete.

Other than as described above, there were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting in the quarter ended September 30, 2007 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the ordinary course of operations, TransCommunity and its subsidiary bank expect to be parties to various legal proceedings. At present, there are no pending or threatened proceedings against TransCommunity or its subsidiary which, if determined adversely, would have a material effect on the business, results of operations, or financial position of TransCommunity or its subsidiary.

The Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006 included disclosure on pending litigation. (See also Note 9 above for information on this pending litigation.) There have been no developments that would change that disclosure.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes in the risk factors disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2006.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

On September 5, 2007, the Company entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger with Community Bankers Acquisition Corp. (“CBAC”). See Note 10 to the financial statements in Part I, Item 1 for a description of the proposed business combination.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are filed or incorporated by reference as part of this Form 10-Q:


Exhibit No.		Description of Exhibits
31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (filed herewith)
31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) (filed herewith)
32		Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (filed herewith)

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


	TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORPORATION
	(Registrant)

Date: November 2, 2007	/s/ Bruce B. Nolte
	Bruce B. Nolte
	Chief Executive Officer
	(principal executive officer)

Date: November 2, 2007	/s/ Patrick J. Tewell
	Patrick J. Tewell
	Chief Financial Officer
	(principal financial and accounting officer)

Filing Compare · TRANSCOMMUNITY FINANCIAL CORP