UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549

~~SECURITIES~~ FORM ~~AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION~~10-K

Washington, D.C. 20549

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2004

or

o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____ to _____

~~FORM~~Commission ~~10-K~~File ~~ANNUAL~~Number ~~REPORT~~- ~~PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934~~1-10184

~~For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 Commission File Number - 1-10184~~ ABATIX CORP. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) 75-1908110 (I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) ~~8201 Eastpoint Drive, Suite 500, Dallas, Texas (Address of principal executive offices) 75227 (Zip Code)~~

Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (214) 381-1146 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act: None Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act: Common Stock

8201 Eastpoint Drive, Suite 500, Dallas, Texas		75227

(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code:		(214) 381-0322

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (b) of the Act:		None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12 (g) of the Act:		Common Stock

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding ~~twelve~~ 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ~~[X]~~ x No ~~[ ]~~ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [X] 1,711,148 shares of common stock, $.001 par value, were issued and outstanding on March 19, 2002. The aggregate market value of the Registrant’s common stock held by nonaffiliates of the Registrant as of the close of business on March 19, 2002 (an aggregate of 800,095 shares out of a total of 1,711,148 shares outstanding at that time) was $4,120,489 computed by reference to the closing bid price of $5.150 on March 19, 2002. Portions of the Registrant’s proxy statement for its 2002 annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated into Part III, herein, by this reference thereto. o

~~PART~~ Indicate Iby check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. o

~~Item~~ Indicate 1by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Act). ~~Business~~ Yes o No x

The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates on June 30, 2004 (abased on the closing stock price on the Nasdaq Stock Market on such date) ~~Development~~ ofwas ~~Business~~approximately $2,875,000.

~~Abatix Corp. (the~~ ~~“Company”)~~1,711,148 ~~markets~~shares ~~and~~of ~~distributes~~common ~~personal~~stock, ~~protection~~$.001 ~~and~~par ~~safety equipment and durable and nondurable supplies predominantly to the environmental industry~~value, ~~the~~were ~~industrial~~issued ~~safety industry~~ and, ~~combined~~outstanding ~~with~~on ~~tools~~March ~~and tool supplies~~21, ~~to the construction industry~~2005.

~~The Company began~~ ~~operations~~Documents inIncorporated ~~May~~By 1983 as a supply company located in Dallas, Texas, and was originally incorporated in Texas as T&T Supply Company, Inc. in March 1984. Abatix was incorporated in Delaware on December 5, 1988 to effect and complete an Agreement and Plan of Merger with T&T Supply on December 9, 1988. In March 1989, the Company completed its initial public offering of its securities. Reference

~~During 1994, because of~~ ~~increased~~Certain ~~purchasing~~information ~~power,~~contained in the ~~Company,~~definitive ~~through~~Proxy ~~its~~Statement ~~wholly~~for ~~owned~~the ~~subsidiary International~~Company’s ~~Enviroguard~~Annual ~~Systems,~~Meeting ~~Inc.~~of ~~(“IESI”),~~Stockholders ~~began~~ to ~~import certain~~be ~~products~~held ~~sold~~on ~~through~~May ~~not only the Company’s distribution channels~~26, ~~but~~ ~~also~~2005 ~~other~~is ~~distribution~~incorporated ~~companies~~by ~~not~~reference ininto ~~direct~~Part ~~competition~~III ~~with Abatix~~hereof.

~~Effective~~PART January 1, 1999, the Company consummated an Asset Purchase Agreement with Keliher Hardware Company, a California corporation, pursuant to which the Company assumed the operations of Keliher. Keliher, based in Los Angeles, California, is an industrial supply distributor, primarily for the construction and industrial markets. The estimated fair value of the assets acquired was approximately $975,000. The aggregate purchase price was settled with the assumption of certain liabilities (approximately $900,000), the issuance of 23,500 shares of the Company’s $.001 par value common stock at a value of $3.45 per share and the remainder in cash. This acquisition has been accounted for using the purchase method. I

~~On April 6, 1999, the~~ ~~Company~~Item ~~closed its Denver facility. The Denver facility had sales of approximately $353,000 and $~~1~~,449,000 for the years ended December 31, 1999 and 1998, respectively~~. ~~The Company did not incur any significant charges related to the shutdown~~ Business.

~~Effective June 1, 1999, the~~ ~~Company consummated an Asset Purchase Agreement with North State Supply Co. of Phoenix, an Arizona corporation, pursuant to which the Company assumed the operations of North State,~~ (a) Development ~~construction supply distributor. The estimated fair value~~ of the identifiable assets acquired was approximately $1,800,000. The aggregate purchase price was settled with the assumption of certain liabilities (approximately $785,000) and approximately $2,100,000 in cash. This acquisition has been accounted for using the purchase method. Business

~~The~~ Abatix ~~Company~~Corp. ~~intends~~(“Abatix”) ~~to expand~~markets and ~~diversify~~distributes ~~the~~personal ~~revenue~~protection ~~base~~and ~~through~~safety equipment and durable and nondurable supplies predominantly to the ~~expansion~~environmental ofindustry, ~~product~~the ~~lines~~industrial safety industry, ~~hiring~~ ~~additional~~the ~~personnel~~homeland security industry and, combined with tools and ~~additional~~tool ~~acquisitions~~supplies, ifto ~~appropriate~~the construction industry. Abatix, ~~In addition~~through its wholly owned subsidiary, ~~the~~International ~~Company~~Enviroguard ~~developed~~Systems, anInc. ~~e-commerce~~(“IESI”), ~~solution~~a toDelaware ~~help~~corporation, ~~solidify relationships~~imports ~~with~~disposable ~~the~~clothing ~~existing~~sold ~~customer~~through ~~base~~Abatix and ~~expand~~other ~~its~~distribution ~~geographic presence~~companies not in direct competition with Abatix. ~~(b) Financial~~ Abatix ~~Information~~and ~~About~~IESI ~~Operating~~are ~~Segments~~collectively referred to herein as the “Company.”

~~Information~~ The ~~about~~Company ~~the~~ began operations in May 1983 as an industrial safety supply company located in Dallas, Texas, and was originally incorporated in Texas as T&T Supply Company’s, ~~operating~~Inc. ~~segments~~in isMarch ~~included~~1984. To prepare for its initial public offering of its securities in ~~the~~March ~~Notes~~1989, Abatix incorporated in Delaware on December 5, 1988 to ~~the~~effect ~~Consolidated Financial~~and ~~Statements~~complete atan ~~Item~~Agreement ~~14. (c) Narrative~~and ~~Description~~Plan of ~~Business~~Merger with T&T Supply on December 9, 1988.

~~Based on 2001 sales,~~ ~~approximately~~As 49opportunities ~~percent of the Company’s products are sold~~ to ~~environmental~~ ~~contractors,~~enter 19new ~~percent~~markets toarose ~~construction~~over ~~related~~the ~~firms~~years, 19the ~~percent to~~Company ~~the~~expanded ~~industrial~~geographically. The ~~safety~~basic ~~market,~~growth ~~and~~philosophy 13has ~~percent~~been to ~~other~~find ~~firms.~~the ~~The~~right ~~Company believes~~people, aand ~~majority~~then ofdetermine ~~its~~if ~~sales for~~ the ~~foreseeable~~geographic ~~future~~market ~~will~~can ~~continue~~support toa ~~be made~~full toservice ~~environmental~~sales ~~contractors~~office/distribution center. During ~~The~~our ~~Company~~history, ~~considers~~the ~~its~~following ~~relationship~~branches, ~~with its~~beyond ~~customers~~our toinitial beDallas ~~excellent.~~location, were opened:

~~Environmental~~• ~~Industry~~San ~~Background Asbestos~~Francisco ~~Abatement~~– ~~Industry~~December 1988 • Houston – February 1990 • Los Angeles – August 1991 • Phoenix – January 1993 • Denver – February 1993 (closed April 1999) • Seattle – January 1994 • Las Vegas – December 1995

~~Between 1900 and the early~~ ~~1970‘s,~~The ~~asbestos~~Company ~~was~~intends ~~extensively~~to ~~used~~expand ~~for insulation~~ and ~~fireproofing~~diversify ~~in industrial, commercial and governmental facilities as well as private residences in~~ the ~~United~~revenue ~~States~~base ~~and~~through inhiring ~~other~~additional ~~industrialized~~sales ~~countries.~~personnel, Inadding ~~the mid-1980‘s~~products itor ~~was~~product ~~estimated that in the United States~~lines, ~~approximately~~opening ~~20 percent~~new oflocations ~~all~~and ~~buildings,~~acquiring ~~excluding~~other ~~residences and schools~~companies, ~~contained~~if ~~friable asbestos-containing materials that were brittle~~appropriate. Furthermore, ~~readily crumble and were susceptible to~~ the ~~release~~Company ofmaintains ~~asbestos~~an ~~dust.~~e-commerce ~~Various diseases such as asbestosis~~solution, ~~lung~~including ~~cancer~~on-line ~~and mesothelioma~~ordering, ~~linked~~ to ~~the~~help ~~exposure~~solidify torelationships ~~airborne asbestos,~~with ~~and~~ the ~~presence~~existing ofcustomer ~~asbestos~~base ~~in insulation, service applications~~ and ~~finishing~~ ~~materials~~expand ~~have~~its ~~given~~geographic ~~rise to the concern about exposure to asbestos~~presence. ~~Public awareness of the health hazards posed by asbestos increased as the results of continuing medical studies became widely known.~~

~~Maintenance,~~(b) Financial ~~repair, renovation~~Information orAbout ~~other~~Operating activities can disturb asbestos-containing material and, if disturbed or damaged, asbestos fibers become airborne and pose a hazard to building occupants and the environment. In October 1986, Congress passed the Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act, which mandates inspections for asbestos, the adoption of asbestos abatement plans and the removal of asbestos from schools and facilities scheduled for demolition. In addition, state and local governments have also adopted asbestos-related regulations. Segments

~~Notwithstanding legislative~~ ~~impetus~~Information ~~and~~about ~~continued awareness of health related hazards associated with asbestos,~~ the ~~budgetary~~Company’s ~~constraints~~operating ~~and~~segments ~~the~~is ~~lack~~included ofin ~~improvement~~Note 8 in the ~~industrial~~ ~~sectors~~Notes ~~continue~~ to ~~limit~~ the ~~number~~Consolidated ~~and~~Financial ~~scope~~Statements ofat ~~asbestos~~Item ~~abatement projects~~15.

~~Lead Abatement Industry~~ The hazards of lead-based paint have been known for many years; however, the federal and state regulations requiring identification, disclosure and cleanup have been minimal. In early 1996, the EPA and the Department of Housing and Urban Development unveiled rules regarding lead-based paint in the residential markets. These rules give homebuyers the right to test for lead-based paint before any contracts are signed. In addition, although a landlord or home seller is not required to test for lead-based paint, the rules do require disclosure of a known lead hazard. 2

~~Many asbestos abatement~~ contractors added lead abatement to their range of services in an attempt to enter a market considered being in its infancy. The asbestos abatement contractors bring equipment, a trained labor force, and experience working in a regulatory environment to the lead abatement industry. Mold Remediation Industry Although mold remediation has been around for years, recent litigation surrounding the health hazards of human exposure to mold has created public awareness and is forcing property owners and the construction industry to deal with the problem. To grow, mold needs moisture, a carbon source (~~wood, plasterboard, natural fibers, or any organic matter~~c), Narrative ~~lack~~Description of air movement and lack of light. The energy crisis in the 1970‘s inspired many energy efficiency programs, including the building of structures that promoted less air movement. When a moisture source is introduced, the conditions are ripe for mold growth. Business

~~Although~~ Based ~~there~~on ~~are approximately~~2004 ~~100~~sales,~~000~~ ~~species~~approximately 46% of ~~fungi,~~the ~~about~~Company’s ~~100~~products are ~~considered~~sold to ~~be pathogenic~~environmental contractors, 17% to ~~humans.~~construction ~~Currently~~related firms, 19% to the ~~regulations~~industrial ~~concerning~~safety ~~mold~~market ~~levels~~and ~~or remediation~~18% ~~are~~to ~~few;~~other ~~however,~~firms. The ~~there~~Company ~~has~~believes ~~been~~a ~~some~~majority ~~discussion~~of atits sales for the ~~EPA~~foreseeable ~~and state~~future ~~government~~will ~~levels~~continue ~~about~~to ~~defining~~be ~~the~~made ~~level~~to ofenvironmental ~~mold~~contractors ~~spores~~and ~~considered~~considers its relationship with its customers to be ~~hazardous.~~ excellent.

~~Many asbestos abatement~~ ~~contractors~~Environmental added mold remediation to their range of services. Beginning in late 2000 the Company began to see activity from this industry and anticipates continued growth for the immediate future. Construction Tools Supply Industry Besides the normal hand and power tools, and associated consumable parts, supplied to the construction industry, the EPA and OSHA have also established certain rules and regulations governing the protection of the environment and the protection of workers in this industry.

~~Currently, the Company~~ ~~supplies~~Asbestos ~~the~~Abatement ~~construction~~Industry tools industry in its Las Vegas, Los Angeles, and Phoenix facilities and on a limited basis from its other facilities. This industry is directly tied to the local economies and more specifically, the real estate conditions within those markets. The condition of the real estate industry in the Company’s markets remains stable.

~~Industrial Safety Industry~~ ~~The~~Between ~~EPA~~1900 and the ~~Occupational~~early ~~Safety~~1970’s, ~~and~~asbestos ~~Health~~was ~~Administration~~extensively ~~(“OSHA”)~~used ~~have established~~for ~~numerous~~insulation ~~rules~~ and ~~regulations~~fireproofing ~~governing~~in ~~environmental~~industrial, ~~protection~~ commercial and ~~worker~~governmental ~~safety~~facilities as well as private residences in the United States and ~~health~~in other industrialized countries. In ~~The~~the ~~demand~~mid-1980’s ~~for~~it ~~supplies~~was estimated that in the United States, approximately 20% of all buildings, excluding residences and ~~equipment~~schools, bycontained ~~U.S. businesses~~friable asbestos-containing materials that were brittle and ~~governments~~were susceptible to ~~meet~~the ~~these~~release ~~rules~~of asbestos dust. Various diseases, such as asbestosis, lung cancer and ~~regulations~~mesothelioma, ~~has~~have ~~resulted~~been in linked to the ~~creation~~exposure to airborne asbestos. Through medical studies, the public has become aware of athe ~~multi-billion~~diseases ~~dollar~~associated ~~industry.~~with asbestos.

~~As research identifies the~~ ~~degree~~Maintenance, ofrepair, ~~environmental~~renovation or ~~health~~other ~~risk~~activities ~~associated~~can ~~with~~disturb ~~various~~asbestos-containing ~~substances~~material and ~~working~~, ~~conditions~~if disturbed or damaged, ~~new~~asbestos ~~rules~~fibers become airborne and ~~regulations~~pose ~~can~~a behazard ~~expected~~to building occupants and the environment. In ~~These~~October ~~actions inevitably~~1986, ~~will~~Congress ~~require~~passed ~~more~~the ~~expenditure~~Asbestos ~~for~~Hazard ~~supplies~~Emergency ~~and~~Response ~~equipment~~Act, which mandates inspections for ~~handling~~ asbestos, ~~remediation~~the ~~and~~adoption ~~disposal~~ of ~~hazardous~~asbestos ~~substances~~abatement plans and the ~~creation~~removal of ~~safe~~ ~~living~~asbestos from schools and ~~working~~facilities ~~conditions~~scheduled for renovation or demolition. ~~Geographic~~ ~~Distribution~~In addition, state and local governments have also adopted asbestos-related regulations. Even with these federal, state and local regulations, budgetary constraints continue to limit the number and scope of ~~Business~~asbestos abatement projects.

~~With~~Lead ~~the~~Abatement ~~acquisition~~Industry of Keliher and North State in 1999, the Company distributes over 22,000 industrial, construction tool, personal protection, safety and hazardous waste remediation products to approximately 7,300 customers primarily located in the Southwest, Midwest and Pacific Coast.

The ~~Company~~hazards ~~maintains sales~~of lead-based paint have been known for many years; however, ~~distribution~~the federal and ~~warehouse~~state ~~centers~~regulations inrequiring ~~Los~~identification, ~~Angeles~~disclosure and ~~San~~cleanup ~~Francisco~~have been minimal. In early 1996, ~~California,~~ inthe ~~Dallas~~Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and ~~Houston,~~the ~~Texas,~~Department inof ~~Phoenix,~~Housing ~~Arizona,~~and Urban Development unveiled rules regarding lead-based paint in ~~Las~~the ~~Vegas~~residential markets. These rules give homebuyers the right to test for lead-based paint before signing a contract. In addition, ~~Nevada,~~ ~~and~~although ina ~~Seattle~~landlord or home seller is not required to test for lead-based paint, ~~Washington. Equipment~~the ~~and~~rules ~~Supplies~~do require disclosure of such, if known.

An Many ~~estimated~~asbestos 38abatement ~~percent~~contractors added lead abatement to their range of ~~the~~ ~~Company’s~~services ~~current~~in ~~year~~an ~~sales~~attempt ~~were~~to ~~safety~~enter ~~products,~~a 31market ~~percent~~considered ~~were environmental~~being ~~products,~~in ~~while~~its ~~construction~~infancy. The ~~tools~~asbestos ~~and~~abatement ~~supplies~~contractors ~~accounted~~bring ~~for~~equipment, ~~22 percent~~a oftrained ~~its~~labor ~~sales.~~force ~~The~~and ~~remaining~~experience 10working ~~percent~~in ofa ~~sales~~regulatory ~~were~~environment ~~miscellaneous products~~to ~~used~~the bylead ~~environmental~~abatement ~~contractors~~industry; however, ~~construction~~budgetary ~~contractors~~constraints ~~and industrial~~also ~~manufacturing~~limit ~~facilities.~~the number of these projects.

~~The Company buys products~~ from manufacturers based on orders received from its customers as well as anticipated needs based on prior buying patterns, customer inquiries and industry experiences. The Company maintains an inventory of disposable products and commodities as well as low cost equipment items. Approximately 75 and 78 percent of the Company’s sales for 2001 and 2000, respectively, are of disposable items and commodity products, which are sold to customers at unit prices ranging from under $1.00 to $50.00. The balance of sales is attributable to items consisting of lower priced equipment beginning at $20.00 to major product assemblies such as decontamination trailers which retail for approximately $15,000. The Company currently does not manufacture or lease any products and does not perform any repairs thereon. The Company distributes, on a limited basis, disposable items under its own private label. 3

~~Except with regard to~~ ~~certain~~Mold ~~specialty~~Remediation ~~equipment~~Industry associated with asbestos abatement activities such as filtration, vacuum and pressure differential systems, many of the Company’s products can be used interchangeably within many of the industries it supplies. Equipment distributed by the Company includes manufacturers’ product descriptions and instructions pertaining to use. Marketing

~~The Company’s~~ ~~marketing~~Although ~~program~~mold isremediation ~~conducted~~has bybeen ~~its~~around ~~sales~~for ~~representatives~~years, aslitigation ~~well~~over asthe ~~by senior~~past ~~management~~several years surrounding the health hazards of human exposure to mold has created public awareness and is forcing property owners and the ~~leaders~~construction atindustry ~~each~~to ofdeal ~~its~~with ~~operating~~the ~~facilities~~problem. To ~~The~~grow, ~~sales representatives~~mold ~~are~~requires ~~compensated~~moisture, by a ~~combination~~carbon source (wood, plasterboard, natural fibers, or any organic matter), lack of ~~salary~~air movement and~~/or~~ ~~commission~~little to no light. The energy crisis in the 1970’s inspired many energy efficiency programs, including the building of structures that promoted less air movement which isincreased ~~based~~the ~~upon~~likelihood ~~negotiated~~of ~~sales~~a ~~standards.~~mold problem.

~~The Company maintains~~ ~~24-hours-a-day/7-days-a-week~~Although ~~telephone~~there ~~service~~are ~~for~~approximately ~~its~~100,000 ~~customers~~species ~~and~~of ~~typically delivers~~fungi, ~~supplies~~about ~~and~~100 ~~equipment~~are ~~within~~considered ~~two~~to orbe ~~three~~pathogenic ~~days~~to ~~of receipt of an order~~humans. ~~The~~ Currently, ~~Company~~there isare ~~prepared~~few toregulations ~~provide~~concerning ~~products~~mold onlevels anor ~~expedited~~mold ~~basis~~remediation. However, in ~~response~~2003, ~~to requests~~the ~~from~~Institute ~~customers~~of ~~who~~Inspection, ~~require~~Cleaning ~~immediate~~and ~~deliveries~~Restoration ~~because~~Certification ~~their~~adopted ~~work~~S520, ~~is performed~~“Mold ~~during~~Remediation ~~non-business~~Standard ~~hours,~~and ~~involves~~Reference ~~substantial~~Guide.” The ~~costs~~S520 ~~because~~Standard ofdescribes the ~~specialized~~ ~~labor~~procedures ~~crews~~to ~~involved~~be orfollowed ~~may~~and ~~arise~~the onprecautions ~~short~~to ~~notice~~be astaken awhen ~~result~~performing ~~of exigent~~mold ~~conditions~~remediation.

Many asbestos and lead abatement contractors added mold remediation to their range of services. In addition, fire, water, and smoke restoration contractors added mold remediation to their range of services. The Company ~~also~~had ~~has~~very afew ~~web site,~~sales ~~www~~to restoration contractors before the heightened awareness of mold.~~abatix.com~~ In late 2000, ~~that~~the ~~allows~~Company ~~customers~~began to ~~place~~see ~~orders~~high ~~on-line~~levels of activity from this industry, primarily in Texas. The ~~Currently~~ growth in this industry continued into the ~~web~~early ~~site~~part ~~has~~of ~~approximately~~the 5fourth quarter of 2002,~~000~~ ~~products;~~but slowed significantly in the ~~remaining~~first ~~products~~half ~~will~~of ~~be added~~2003 ~~over~~and has remained level for the ~~next~~past ~~twelve~~eighteen months. The Indecline ~~addition~~in 2003 occurred primarily because insurance laws in Texas changed to ~~on-line~~eliminate ~~ordering,~~or limit the ~~web~~insurance ~~site has~~companies’ ~~current~~exposure ~~industry~~to ~~and~~mold ~~Company~~liabilities, ~~information~~resulting in fewer projects being undertaken. While there has been some increased legal activity in states other than Texas, the limited liability on insurance policies has ~~Backlog~~inhibited the growth of this industry.

~~Substantially all the~~ ~~Company’s~~Homeland ~~products are shipped to customers within 48 hours following receipt of the order, therefore backlog is not material to the Company’s operations. Inflation~~Security

~~The~~ Seeing ~~inflation~~an ~~rate~~opportunity ~~for~~to ~~the U.S.~~leverage ~~economy~~our ~~has~~current ~~been~~product ~~relatively~~lines ~~low~~with ~~over~~some ~~the~~additional ~~past~~lines, ~~several~~including ~~years~~consulting and training, ~~with~~the Company entered the ~~2001 inflation~~Homeland ~~rate~~Security ~~being~~market 1in August 2002.6 A ~~percent~~2003 industry report published by U.S. ~~The~~Bancorp ~~2002~~Piper ~~inflation~~Jaffray ~~rate~~(“Piper isJaffray”) ~~projected~~indicated tothe beSecurity industry generates over $120 billion in ~~the~~ 2annual revenue on a global basis and is expected to 3grow ~~percent~~at ~~range~~8.5% through 2006. The ~~Company~~United ~~believes~~States ~~inflation~~accounts ~~has~~for ~~not~~approximately ~~been~~$43 billion ~~a substantial~~of ~~concern~~the ~~nor~~global ~~will~~revenue ~~inflation~~and ~~have~~is aprojected ~~material~~to ~~impact~~grow toat ~~the Company’s~~approximately ~~operations~~7% orreaching ~~profitability~~$60 billion in 2006. The Piper Jaffray report breaks down the ~~near~~industry ~~term~~into segments, ifand itestimates ~~remains stable.~~the InPersonal ~~the~~Safety ~~event~~Products ofsegment ~~increased~~generates ~~inflation~~$4 billion in annual domestic revenue. In addition, this report depicts that funding for the ~~Company~~Department ~~anticipates~~of itHomeland ~~would~~Security ~~be able~~is toapproximately ~~pass~~50% ~~along~~of ~~increases~~the intotal ~~product~~domestic ~~costs~~revenue togenerated. While ~~its~~state ~~customers~~and inlocal ~~the~~governments ~~form~~account offor ~~higher~~some ~~selling~~of ~~prices~~the difference, ~~thereby~~the ~~having~~private ~~little~~sector ~~effect~~is onalso ~~product~~considered ~~margins.~~to ~~Environmental~~be ~~Impact~~a participant in this industry.

~~The Company distributes a~~ ~~variety~~Much of ~~products~~the inCompany’s ~~the~~activity ~~asbestos~~in ~~abatement~~this industry ~~all of which require the Company~~ to ~~maintain~~date onhas ~~file~~been ~~Material~~with ~~Safety~~the ~~Data~~public ~~Sheets~~sector ~~(“MSDS”)~~attempting ~~that inform~~to ~~all~~outfit ~~purchasers~~the ~~and~~first ~~users~~responders. Because ofthese ~~any~~activities ~~potential~~are ~~hazards~~broad ~~which~~in ~~could~~scope ~~occur~~and ~~if the~~tend ~~products~~to ~~spilled~~be orlarge ~~leaked.~~dollar ~~Although~~orders, the ~~Company~~purchasing ~~provides~~departments nofor ~~assurance,~~these ~~it reviews~~governmental ~~all~~entities ~~products~~solicit ~~that~~bids ~~could have a potential for environmental hazards~~ and ~~tries~~ togenerally ~~ensure~~select the ~~products~~lowest ~~are~~product ~~safe~~price. Unlike ~~for~~our oncurrent ~~site~~business ~~storage~~model, ~~and~~the ~~distribution.~~sales ~~The Company~~cycle ~~currently~~tends ~~distributes~~to nobe ~~products~~long itand ~~believes~~can ~~would~~sometimes ~~create~~be ~~an environmental~~unsuccessful. To ~~hazard~~meet ifthese ~~leaked~~challenges, orwe ~~spilled.~~changed ~~The~~some ~~Company~~of ~~has~~our ~~safety~~processes ~~procedures in place~~ to ~~minimize~~lower ~~any~~our ~~impact~~costs ifrelated ~~a product were~~ to ~~leak~~these ortypes ~~spill.~~of ~~Seasonality~~orders.

Historically, the environmental services and supply business has been seasonal as a result of the substantial number of contracts performed in educational facilities during the summer months or during other vacation periods. The Company believes seasonality is not a major characteristic in the non-educational or private sector, which includes the industrial, commercial and residential markets. In addition to the private sector environmental business, the Company’s expansion of the construction and industrial safety supply markets has mitigated most seasonal impacts of government environmental projects on the Company’s sales. 4

~~The Company’s~~ ~~profitability~~We ~~historically~~are ~~increases~~also inworking with the ~~second~~private ~~and~~sector ~~third quarters~~businesses, ~~relative to~~which traditionally focus on the ~~first~~value Abatix provides, and ~~fourth~~less ~~quarters~~on the price of the product. Albeit ~~This~~small, ~~increase~~we ishave ~~attributable~~been successful in selling to the ~~small increase~~private sector. As the economy continues to strengthen, we expect companies to invest more dollars in ~~revenues~~our ~~during~~products ~~the~~and ~~second~~services so their facilities and ~~third~~personnel ~~quarters~~are ~~without~~prepared. However, ~~a corresponding~~unless ~~increase~~there inare ~~costs~~regulations mandating security products or another attack similar to September 11th, asthe ~~fixed~~private ~~costs~~sector ~~represent~~may anot ~~majority~~be ofwilling ~~total general~~to ~~and~~invest ~~administrative~~significant ~~costs~~dollars. ~~Government Regulation~~

~~As a supplier of products~~ ~~manufactured~~Construction byTools ~~others~~Supply toIndustry the environmental supply, construction tool and industrial safety industry, the Company’s internal operations are not substantially affected by federal laws and regulations including those promulgated by the EPA and OSHA. Most of the contractors and other purchasers of the Company’s equipment and supplies are subject to various government regulations. Developments in legislation and regulations affecting manufacturers and purchasers of the Company’s products could have a substantial effect on the Company. Competition

~~The~~ Besides ~~environmental~~the ~~supply, industrial~~normal ~~safety~~hand and ~~construction~~power tools, ~~supply~~and ~~businesses~~associated ~~are~~consumable ~~highly competitive. These markets are served by a limited number of large national firms as well as many local firms~~parts, ~~none~~supplied ofto ~~which can be characterized as controlling~~ the ~~market.~~construction ~~The~~industry, ~~Company competes on~~ the ~~basis~~EPA ~~of price, delivery, credit arrangements~~ and ~~product~~Occupational ~~variety~~Safety and ~~quality.~~Health ~~Substantial~~Administration ~~regulatory~~(“OSHA”) ~~or economic~~have ~~barriers~~also toestablished ~~entry~~certain dorules ~~not~~and ~~characterize~~regulations governing the ~~Company’s~~protection ~~business. Furthermore, additional companies could enter any~~ of ~~these~~the ~~industries~~environment and ~~may have~~the ~~greater~~protection ~~financial,~~of ~~marketing~~workers ~~and~~in ~~technical~~this ~~resources than the Company~~industry. ~~Employees~~

As Currently, ofthe ~~February~~Company 28supplies the construction tools industry in its Las Vegas, ~~2002~~Los Angeles, ~~the~~ ~~Company~~and ~~employed~~Phoenix facilities and on a ~~total~~limited ofbasis ~~127~~from ~~full~~its ~~time~~other ~~employees~~facilities. This ~~including~~industry 3is ~~executive officers~~directly tied to the local economies and more specifically, 19the ~~managers~~real estate conditions within those markets. The real estate industry initially declined after the events of September 11, 612001, ~~administrative~~stabilized in 2003 and ~~marketing~~has ~~personnel~~shown ~~and~~signs 44of ~~clerical and~~improvement ~~warehouse~~since ~~personnel.~~early 2004. The Company ~~believes~~anticipates ~~relations~~this ~~with~~industry ~~its~~to ~~employees~~improve ~~are excellent.~~in 2005 as the economy continues to improve.

~~Item~~ Industrial ~~2. Description~~Safety ofIndustry ~~Properties~~

The ~~Company’s headquarters~~EPA ~~are located in Dallas, Texas~~ and ~~occupy~~OSHA ~~approximately~~have ~~6,400~~established ~~square feet~~numerous ofrules ~~leased~~and ~~general~~regulations ~~office~~governing ~~space.~~environmental ~~This~~protection ~~lease~~and ~~expires~~worker insafety ~~February~~and ~~2005~~health. The Asdemand ~~of December 31,~~for ~~2001,~~supplies ~~the~~and ~~seven~~equipment ~~distribution~~by ~~facilities~~U.S. ~~lease~~businesses aand ~~total~~governments ~~of 166,235~~to ~~square~~meet ~~feet~~these ofrules ~~general office~~ and ~~warehouse~~regulations ~~space.~~has ~~These~~resulted ~~facilities range~~ in ~~size~~the ~~from~~creation ~~9,000~~of ~~square~~a ~~feet~~multi-billion todollar ~~33,600 with leases expiring between May 2002 and November 2006~~industry.

~~Item~~ As 3research identifies the degree of environmental or health risk associated with various substances and working conditions, new rules and regulations can be expected. ~~Legal~~ These ~~Proceedings None~~actions inevitably will require more expenditure for supplies and equipment for handling, remediation and disposal of hazardous substances and the creation of safe living and working conditions. However, potentially offsetting these gains are manufacturing automation and productivity improvements which potentially result in fewer people to protect, and movement of labor intensive operations offshore where there is less regulation.

~~Item~~Geographic ~~4. Submission~~Distribution of ~~Matters to a Vote of Security Holders None~~Business

~~PART~~ The IICompany distributes over 20,000 industrial, construction tool, personal protection, safety and hazardous waste remediation products to approximately 4,100 active customers primarily located in the Southwest, Midwest, Pacific Coast, Alaska and Hawaii.

~~Item~~ 5~~. Market for the Registrant's Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters~~

~~(a)~~ The Company~~’s common~~ ~~stock~~maintains ~~trades~~sales, ondistribution ~~The~~and ~~Nasdaq~~warehouse ~~SmallCap~~centers ~~Market~~in ~~tier~~Los ofAngeles ~~The~~and ~~Nasdaq~~San ~~Stock Market~~Francisco, ~~under~~California, ~~the~~Dallas ~~symbol “ABIX”. The following table sets forth the high~~ and ~~low~~Houston, ~~bid~~Texas, ~~prices~~Phoenix, ~~for~~Arizona, ~~the~~Las ~~common stock for the periods indicated. These quotations reflect prices between dealers~~Vegas, ~~do not include retail mark-ups~~Nevada, ~~mark-downs~~ ~~or commissions~~ and ~~may~~Seattle, ~~not necessarily represent actual transactions~~Washington.

~~Common Stock~~ ~~Bid~~In Price ----------------------------- 2000 High Low -------------------------- ------------ ----------- FirstAugust ~~Quarter $ 3.375 $ 1.000 Second~~2004, ~~Quarter 1.844 0.250 Third~~the ~~Quarter 2.500 1.344 Fourth~~Company ~~Quarter 2.250 1.063 2001 -------------------------- First~~opened ~~Quarter $ 1.844 $ 1.063 Second~~a ~~Quarter 2.300 1.760 Third~~temporary ~~Quarter 3~~office in Tampa, Florida to help contractors respond to the devastation from the hurricanes.~~400 1.870 Fourth~~ This ~~Quarter 6~~office was closed in February 2005.~~250 2.900~~

~~(b) As~~ Equipment ofand ~~March 19, 2002, the approximate number of holders of record of the Company's common stock was 600.~~Supplies

~~(c) The Company has never~~ ~~paid~~An ~~cash~~estimated ~~dividends~~35% onof ~~its~~the ~~common stock. The~~ Company’s ~~presently~~current ~~intends~~year tosales ~~retain any~~were ~~future~~environmental ~~earnings~~products toand ~~finance~~29% ~~the~~were ~~expansion~~safety ofproducts, ~~its~~while ~~business~~construction ortools ~~repay borrowings on its lines of credit~~ and ~~does~~supplies ~~not~~accounted ~~anticipate~~for ~~that any cash dividends will be paid in the foreseeable future~~13%. The ~~Future~~remaining ~~dividend~~23% ~~policy~~of ~~will~~sales ~~depend~~were onmiscellaneous ~~the Company’s~~products ~~earnings,~~used ~~capital~~by ~~requirements,~~environmental ~~expansion plans~~contractors, ~~financial conditions,~~construction contractors and ~~other~~industrial ~~relevant~~manufacturing ~~factors~~facilities.

The ~~tables~~Company ~~below~~buys ~~set~~products ~~forth, in~~from ~~summary~~manufacturers ~~form,~~based ~~selected~~on ~~financial~~orders ~~data~~received from its customers as well as anticipated needs based on prior buying patterns and customer inquiries. The Company maintains an inventory of disposable products and commodities as well as low cost equipment items. Approximately 80% of the Company.’s ~~This~~sales ~~data~~are of disposable items and commodity products, which are sold to customers at unit prices ranging from under $1.00 to $50.00. The balance of sales is ~~not covered~~attributable byto ~~the~~items ~~independent~~consisting ~~auditors’~~of ~~report,~~lower ~~should~~priced beequipment ~~read~~beginning at $20.00 to construction related tools that can retail in ~~conjunction with~~excess ~~the~~of ~~consolidated~~$10,000. The ~~financial~~Company ~~statements~~currently ~~and~~does ~~notes~~not ~~thereto~~manufacture ~~which~~or ~~are~~lease ~~included elsewhere~~any ~~herein~~products. On ~~(amounts~~a invery ~~thousands~~limited ~~except~~scale, ~~per~~the ~~share~~Company ~~amounts)~~provides warranty repair on certain equipment. The Company distributes, on a limited basis, disposable items under its own private label.

~~Year~~Except ~~Ended~~with ~~December~~regard 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- Selectedto ~~Operating~~certain ~~Results: Net~~specialty ~~sales $ 54,726 $ 47,987 $ 44,576 $ 37,684 $ 34,341 Gross~~equipment profit $ 15,384 $ 12,982 $ 12,217 $ 10,837 $ 10,037 ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- Netassociated ~~earnings $ 1~~with environmental remediation activities such as filtration,~~206 $ 598 $ 461 $ 1,167 $ 841 ========== =========== =========== ========== =========== Basic~~ vacuum and ~~diluted~~pressure ~~net~~differential ~~earnings~~systems, per common share $ .70 $ .35 $ .26 $ .60 $ .43 ========== =========== =========== ========== =========== Basicmany ~~and~~of ~~diluted~~the ~~weighted~~Company’s ~~average shares~~products outstanding 1,711 1,711 1,779 1,934 1,934 ========== =========== =========== ========== =========== Ascan be used interchangeably within many of ~~December~~the 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2001 2000 1999 1998 1997 ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- Selectedindustries ~~Balance~~it ~~Sheet~~supplies. ~~Data: Current~~Equipment ~~assets $ 14,529 $ 12,075 $ 13,220 $ 9,918 $ 9,003 Current~~distributed ~~liabilities 8,603 7,411 9,171 4,408 4,676 Total~~by ~~assets 16,441 14,042 15,204 10,596 9,854 Total~~the ~~liabilities 8,603 7,411 9,171 4,408 4,676 Retained~~Company ~~earnings 7,518 6,312 5,714 5,252 4,085 Stockholders'~~includes ~~equity 7,838 6,631 6,033 6,187 5,178~~ manufacturers’ product descriptions and instructions pertaining to use.

~~Year Ended December 31, 2001 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2000~~ Marketing

~~Consolidated net sales for~~ ~~the year ended December 31, 2001, increased 14 percent to $54,726,000 from $47,987,000 in 2000.~~ The ~~Abatix~~Company’s ~~operating~~marketing ~~segment~~program ~~net~~is ~~sales~~conducted ~~grew~~by 19its ~~percent to $52,461,000 in 2001 and the IESI operating segment net~~ sales ~~decreased 41 percent to $2~~representatives,~~265,000~~ inas ~~2001.~~well ~~Sales~~as ~~were significantly impacted~~ by ~~the increasing~~senior ~~awareness~~management ~~of toxic molds in homes~~ and ~~buildings and by~~ the ~~continuing cleanup~~leaders ~~from~~at ~~the~~each ~~effects~~ of ~~Tropical~~its ~~Storm~~operating ~~Allison on the Houston area~~facilities. The ~~decrease~~ insales ~~IESI~~representatives ~~sales~~are iscompensated ~~due~~by toa ~~the~~combination ~~exit~~of ~~from~~salary aand/or ~~distribution~~commission, ~~channel~~which ~~during~~is ~~the second~~based ~~quarter~~upon ofnegotiated ~~2001.~~sales standards.

~~Sales to the mold~~ ~~remediation,~~The ~~industrial~~Company ~~safety~~maintains ~~and~~24-hours-a-day/7-days-a-week ~~construction~~telephone ~~tools~~service ~~supply~~for ~~markets~~its ~~are increasing~~customers ~~both~~and intypically ~~absolute~~delivers ~~amounts~~supplies and asequipment awithin ~~percentage~~two days of ~~revenues to~~ the ~~Company.~~ ~~The~~receipt ~~acquisitions~~ of ~~Keliher~~an ~~and~~order. The ~~North~~Company ~~State,~~is ~~other~~prepared ~~potential acquisitions,~~to ~~additional~~provide ~~salespeople~~products ~~and~~on ~~internal~~an ~~growth~~expedited basis in ~~these~~response ~~markets~~to ~~should decrease~~requests ~~the~~from ~~dependency~~customers ofwho ~~the~~require ~~Company~~immediate ondeliveries ~~any~~because ~~single~~their ~~product,~~work ~~geographic~~is ~~market or~~performed onduring ~~sales~~non-business tohours, ~~the~~involves ~~asbestos~~substantial ~~abatement~~costs ~~industry.~~because Inof ~~addition,~~ the ~~Company implemented~~specialized anlabor ~~e-commerce~~crews ~~solution~~involved inor ~~2001~~may toarise ~~help~~on ~~solidify~~short ~~relationships~~notice ~~with the~~as ~~existing~~a ~~customer~~result ~~base~~of ~~and~~exigent ~~expand its geographic presence~~conditions.

~~Gross profit for 2001 of~~ ~~$15,384,000~~The ~~increased~~Company 19also ~~percent~~has ~~from~~a ~~gross~~web ~~profit in 2000 of $12~~site,~~982,000~~ ~~due to increased sales volume~~www.abatix.com, ~~The~~which ~~Company’s~~allows ~~gross~~customers ~~profit~~to ~~margins,~~place ~~expressed~~orders ason-line. Currently ~~a percentage~~the ofweb ~~sales,~~site ~~were~~contains approximately 286,000 ~~percent for 2001 and 27 percent for 2000~~products. In ~~Although~~addition ~~overall~~to ~~margins~~on-line ~~are~~ordering, ~~expected~~the toweb ~~remain~~site athas ~~their~~ current ~~levels~~industry ~~in 2002,~~and ~~competitive~~Company ~~pressures~~information, ~~could~~including ~~negatively~~historical ~~impact~~press ~~any~~releases and ~~all~~the ~~efforts~~Company’s byfilings with the ~~Company~~ toSecurity ~~maintain~~and orExchange ~~improve~~Commission ~~product margins~~(“SEC”).

~~Selling, general and~~ administrative expenses for 2001 of $12,991,000 increased 14 percent over 2000 expenses of $11,395,000. These expenses were 24 percent of sales for 2001 and 2000. Selling, general and administrative expenses are expected to be in the 24 to 25 percent range for 2002. 6

~~Interest expense of~~ $380,000 decreased $182,000 from 2000 interest expense of $562,000 primarily due to lower interest rates. The Company’s credit facilities are variable rate notes tied to the Company’s lending institution’s prime rate. Increases in the prime rate could negatively affect the Company’s earnings. Backlog

~~Net~~ Substantially ~~earnings~~all ~~for~~ the ~~year ended~~Company’s ~~December~~products ~~31,~~are ~~2001,~~shipped to customers within 48 hours following receipt of ~~$1,206,000~~the ororder; ~~$.70~~therefore ~~per~~backlog ~~share~~is ~~increased~~not ~~$608,000~~material ~~from net~~to ~~earnings~~the ofCompany’s ~~$598~~operations. During severe weather conditions,~~000~~ orsuch ~~$.35~~as ~~per~~the ~~share~~hurricanes in ~~2000.~~Florida ~~The~~in ~~increase~~2004, the Company can experience severe backlog situations because products in ~~net~~the ~~earnings is~~quantities ~~primarily~~needed ~~due~~are tounavailable from the ~~higher~~manufacturers. Since ~~sales~~the ~~volume~~customer’s ~~and~~need ~~lower~~for ~~interest~~products ~~expense, partially~~is ~~offset~~immediate byin these situations, the ~~higher~~customers ~~general~~will ~~and~~purchase ~~administrative~~from ~~costs.~~whichever supplier can get them the product.

~~Year Ended December 31, 2000 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 1999~~Inflation

~~Consolidated~~ The ~~net~~inflation ~~sales~~rate for the ~~year ended December 31, 2000, increased 8 percent to $47,987,000 from $44,576,000 in 1999~~U.S. ~~The~~economy ~~Abatix~~has ~~operating~~been ~~segment~~relatively ~~net~~low ~~sales~~over ~~grew~~the 5past ~~percent~~several ~~to $44~~years,~~145,000~~ inwith ~~2000 and~~ the ~~IESI~~2004 ~~operating~~inflation ~~segment~~rate ~~net~~around ~~sales increased 58 percent to $~~3~~,842,000 in 2000~~%. The ~~increase~~2005 ininflation ~~consolidated~~rate ~~net~~is ~~sales~~expected ~~resulted from efforts~~ to ~~further~~be ~~expand~~in ~~and~~this ~~diversify~~same ~~the customer base~~range. Therefore, ~~including~~ the ~~introduction~~ ofCompany abelieves ~~new~~inflation ~~distribution~~will ~~channel~~not ~~for~~have ~~IESI and the 1999 acquisition of North State,~~ a ~~construction~~material ~~supply~~impact ~~distributor.~~on ~~The acquisition provides a larger customer base and~~ the ~~ability to cross sell products to both North State and Abatix customers. The increase in net sales is also a result of the stable economic conditions in the geographic regions serviced by the~~ Company’s ~~facilities.~~ ~~The~~operations ~~increase~~or inprofitability ~~net sales for 2000 was partially offset by an 11 percent decline~~ in ~~sales to asbestos abatement contractors and by~~ the ~~April~~near ~~1999 closure of the Company’s Denver facility~~term. ~~This facility had 1999 revenues of approximately $353,000.~~

~~Gross~~ The ~~profit~~Company ~~for~~experienced ~~2000~~cost increases in several of ~~$12,982,000~~ ~~increased~~its 6major ~~percent~~product ~~from~~lines ~~gross~~during ~~profit~~2004 and decreases in ~~1999~~certain other product lines. The majority of ~~$12,217,000~~the ~~due~~price increases were passed along to ~~increased~~ ~~sales~~customers ~~volume.~~in Asthe ~~expected~~form of higher selling prices, thereby having little effect on product margins. We ~~varied~~expect ~~from~~further ~~location~~price toincreases ~~location due~~in tocertain ~~sales~~product ~~mix~~lines in 2005 and ~~local~~we ~~market~~believe ~~conditions.~~these ~~The~~price ~~Company’s~~increases ~~gross~~will ~~profit margins,~~be ~~expressed~~able asto abe ~~percentage~~passed ofon ~~sales,~~to ~~were~~customers. If ~~approximately~~we 27are ~~percent~~unable ~~for 2000~~to pass on these price increases, our gross margins and ~~1999.~~profitability would be negatively impacted.

~~Selling, general and~~ ~~administrative~~Environmental expenses for 2000 of $11,395,000 increased 3 percent over 1999 expenses of $11,083,000. The increase was attributable primarily to the inclusion of North State costs and increased rent due to larger facilities and higher rent rates for three distribution centers and the corporate offices. Leases on three facilities were renegotiated at the end of 1999. Rental rates are higher with the new leases as a result of improved real estate conditions. These expenses were 24 percent of sales for 2000 and 25 percent of sales for 1999. Impact

~~Interest~~ The ~~expense~~Company distributes a variety of ~~$562,000~~ ~~increased~~products ~~$175,000~~in ~~from~~the ~~1999~~environmental ~~interest~~industry ~~expense~~which ofrequires ~~$387,000~~the ~~primarily~~Company ~~due~~ to maintain Material Safety Data Sheets (“MSDS”) on file. These MSDS inform purchasers and users of any potential hazards which could occur if the ~~additional~~products ~~borrowings~~spill ~~used~~or leak. Although the Company provides no assurance, it reviews all products that could have a potential for environmental hazards and tries to ~~finance~~ensure the ~~acquisition~~products ofare ~~North~~safe ~~State~~for ~~and higher~~on ~~interest~~site ~~rates~~storage and distribution. The Company currently distributes no products it believes would create an environmental hazard if leaked or spilled and has safety procedures in place to minimize any impact if such an event occurred.

~~Net earnings for the year~~ ended December 31, 2000, of $598,000 or $.35 per share increased $137,000 from net earnings of $461,000 or $.26 per share in 1999. The increase in net earnings is primarily due to the higher sales volume, partially offset by the higher general and administrative costs and the increased interest expense. Seasonality

~~Liquidity~~ In the past, the environmental supply business has been seasonal as a result of the substantial amount of work performed in educational facilities during the summer months when the weather is generally more conducive to construction or during other vacation periods. The Company believes seasonality is not a major characteristic in the non-educational or private sector, which includes the industrial, commercial and ~~Capital~~residential ~~Resources~~markets. In addition to the private sector environmental business, the Company’s expansion in the construction and industrial safety supply markets has mitigated most seasonal impacts of government environmental projects on the Company’s sales.

The Company’s working capital requirements historically result from the growth of its accounts receivable and inventories, partially offset by increased accounts payable and accrued expenses, associated with increases in sales volume. Net cash used in operations during 2001 of $422,000 resulted principally from the increase in accounts receivable and inventories, net of the increase of net earnings adjusted for depreciation and amortization. The increase in accounts receivable is attributed to higher sales in November and December 2001 versus 2000. Cash flow from operations for the entire year of 2002 is expected to be positive, although at any given point, it may be negative. 7

~~Cash requirements for~~ ~~non-operating~~The ~~activities~~Company’s ~~during~~profitability ~~2001~~historically ~~resulted~~increases ~~primarily~~in ~~from~~ the ~~purchases~~second ~~of property~~ and ~~equipment.~~third ~~In addition~~quarters, ~~net~~relative ~~working~~to ~~capital~~the ~~line~~first ofand ~~credit borrowings~~fourth ~~occurred~~quarters. This ~~primarily~~increase asin aprofitability ~~result~~is ofattributable to the ~~higher~~usual ~~levels~~small ofincrease ~~accounts receivable~~in ~~and~~revenues ~~inventory~~during the second and ~~purchases~~third ofquarters ~~fixed~~without ~~assets.~~the ~~The~~corresponding ~~equipment~~increase ~~purchases~~ in ~~2001~~costs, ~~were~~as ~~primarily~~fixed costs ~~associated~~represent ~~with~~a ~~building~~majority ~~the~~of ~~Company’s e-commerce~~total ~~solution~~general and ~~delivery~~administrative ~~vehicles~~costs.

~~The development of the~~ ~~Company’s~~Government e-commerce solution required a significant capital outlay in 2001. This solution, which could cost $100,000 to market and maintain in 2002, is expected to provide customers a more efficient method of doing business with Abatix and could provide some cost savings in the future, as well as expand the customer base. Regulation

~~In August 2001, the Company~~ ~~increased~~As ~~its~~a ~~working~~supplier ~~capital line~~ of ~~credit~~products atmanufactured aby ~~commercial~~others ~~lending~~to ~~institution from~~the $7environmental supply,~~000,000~~ toconstruction $8tool,~~000,000~~ tohomeland ~~help~~security ~~fund~~and ~~additional~~industrial ~~working~~safety ~~capital requirements~~industries, ~~due to higher sales. The working capital line of credit agreement allows~~ the Company’s tointernal ~~borrow~~operations upare tonot 80substantially ~~percent~~affected ofby ~~the~~federal ~~book~~laws ~~value~~and ofregulations ~~eligible trade~~including ~~receivables~~those ~~plus~~promulgated by the ~~lesser~~EPA ofand ~~40 percent of eligible inventory or $2,000,000~~OSHA. Most As of ~~March~~the ~~19,~~contractors ~~2002,~~and ~~there~~other ~~are~~purchasers ~~advances outstanding under this credit facility~~ of ~~$4,816,000. Based on~~ the ~~borrowing~~Company’s ~~formula,~~equipment ~~the~~and ~~Company~~supplies ~~had the~~are ~~capacity~~subject to ~~borrow~~various angovernment ~~additional $3,184,000 as of March 19, 2002~~regulations. Developments ~~The~~in ~~Company also~~legislation ~~maintains~~and aregulations ~~$550,000~~affecting ~~capital~~manufacturers ~~equipment~~and ~~credit~~purchasers ~~facility providing for borrowings at 80 percent~~ of ~~cost~~the onCompany’s ~~purchases.~~products ~~The~~could ~~advances~~have ~~outstanding~~a ~~under this~~substantial ~~credit~~effect ~~facility as of March 19, 2002, were $55,000. Both credit facilities are payable~~ on ~~demand and bear a variable rate of interest computed at~~ the ~~prime rate~~Company.

~~Management believes the~~ Company’s current credit facilities, together with cash provided by operations, will be sufficient for its capital and liquidity requirements for the next twelve months. In the event the Company pursues additional acquisitions and is unable to use its common stock as payment, the Company would need to negotiate with a lender to secure additional borrowings to be used to acquire another company’s assets. Competition

~~New~~ The ~~Accounting~~environmental ~~Standards~~supply, industrial safety, homeland security and construction tools supply businesses are highly competitive. These markets are served by a limited number of large national firms as well as many regional and local firms, none of which can be characterized as controlling the market. The Company competes on the basis of product availability, variety and quality. In addition, the Company competes on delivery, credit arrangements and price. Substantial regulatory or economic barriers to entry do not characterize the Company’s business. Therefore, additional companies could enter any of these industries and may have greater financial, marketing and technical resources than the Company.

~~In July 2001, the Financial~~ Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (Statement) No. 141, “Business Combinations.” Statement No. 141 requires the purchase method of accounting for business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 and eliminates the pooling-of-interests method. The Company believes that the adoption of Statement No. 141 will not have a significant impact on its financial statements. Employees

~~In July 2001, the FASB~~ ~~issued~~As ~~Statement~~of ~~No. 142,~~February ~~“Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”~~28, ~~which~~ ~~is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15~~2005, ~~2001. Statement No. 142 requires, among other things,~~ the ~~discontinuance~~Company ~~of goodwill~~employed ~~amortization.~~a Intotal ~~addition, the standard includes provisions for testing impairment~~ of ~~existing~~103 ~~goodwill~~full ~~and other intangibles. Upon adoption of Statement 142~~time, ~~the~~non-union ~~Company~~employees ~~will~~including ~~cease~~3 toexecutive ~~amortize approximately $820~~officers,~~000~~ ~~of goodwill.~~18 ~~The Company recorded $110~~managers,~~540~~ of55 ~~amortization~~administrative onand ~~this~~marketing ~~goodwill~~personnel ~~during 2001~~ and ~~would~~27 ~~have~~clerical ~~recorded~~and ~~the~~warehouse ~~same amount during 2002~~personnel. The ~~In addition, the~~ Company ~~will~~believes berelations ~~required~~with ~~to perform an impairment review of~~ its ~~goodwill~~employees ~~balance upon~~are ~~the initial adoption of Statement No~~excellent. ~~142.~~

~~The~~Certain ~~Company~~Factors ~~expects~~That ~~to complete~~May ~~this~~Affect ~~impairment~~Future review during the first quarter of 2002. Based on preliminary calculations, the Company estimates it will record an impairment charge of approximately $820,000 (unaudited). Any charge resulting from this initial impairment test is considered transitional impairment and will be presented on the Consolidated Statement of Operations as a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of applicable income taxes.Results

~~The FASB issued~~ ~~Statement 143,~~Certain ~~“Accounting~~matters ~~for~~discussed ~~Asset Retirement Obligations”~~ in ~~August~~ ~~2001.~~this ~~Statement~~Form ~~143~~10-K, ~~requires~~or andocuments, ~~enterprise~~a toportion ~~record the fair value~~ of ~~an asset~~which ~~retirement~~are ~~obligation~~incorporated asby areference, ~~liability~~concerning, inamong ~~the~~other ~~period~~things, ~~in which it incurs a legal obligation associated with~~ the ~~retirement~~business ofoutlook, aincluding ~~tangible~~growth, ~~long-lived~~cost ~~asset. Statement~~savings, ~~143~~anticipated ~~also~~financial ~~requires~~and ~~the~~operating ~~enterprise~~results, tostrategies ~~record~~and ~~the~~contingencies, ~~contra~~constitute toforward-looking ~~the~~statements ~~initial obligation~~and asare anbased ~~increase~~upon tomanagement’s ~~the~~expectations ~~carrying amount of the related long-lived asset~~ and tobeliefs ~~depreciate~~concerning ~~that~~future ~~cost~~events ~~over~~impacting the ~~remaining useful life of the asset~~Company. ~~Statement~~ There ~~143~~can isbe ~~effective~~no ~~for~~assurance ~~financial~~that ~~statements~~these ~~issued~~events ~~for~~will ~~fiscal~~occur ~~years beginning~~or ~~after~~that ~~June~~the ~~15, 2002. The~~ Company’s ~~does~~results ~~not believe it~~ will ~~have~~be ~~a material~~as ~~impact on the operations of the Company~~estimated.

In The ~~October~~assumptions ~~2001,~~used ~~the~~as ~~FASB issued~~a ~~Statement 144,~~basis ~~“Accounting~~for ~~For~~ the ~~Impairment~~forward-looking orstatements ~~Disposal~~include ~~of Long-Lived~~many ~~Assets.”~~estimates ~~Statement~~that, ~~144~~among ~~has~~other ~~broadened~~things, depend on the ~~presentation~~achievement of ~~discontinued~~ ~~operations~~future tocost ~~include~~savings ~~more disposal transactions,~~ and ~~has~~projected ~~enhanced management’s~~volume ~~ability~~increases. In toaddition, ~~provide~~many ~~information~~factors ~~that~~outside ~~helps~~the ~~financial~~control ~~statement users~~of ~~to assess~~ the ~~effects~~Company, ofincluding athe ~~disposal~~prices ~~transaction~~and onavailability of the ~~ongoing~~Company’s ~~operations of~~products, anpotential ~~entity.~~competitive ~~Statement 144~~pressures ison ~~effective~~selling ~~for~~prices ~~fiscal~~and ~~years~~fuel ~~beginning after December 15~~prices, ~~2001~~ ~~and~~as ~~interim~~well ~~periods~~as ~~within~~general ~~those~~economic ~~fiscal~~conditions ~~years.~~in ~~The Company~~the ~~does~~markets ~~not~~in ~~believe~~which itthe ~~will~~Company ~~have~~operates, aalso ~~material~~could impact on the ~~operations~~realization of ~~the Company.~~such estimates.

~~Critical Accounting Policies~~ 8

The ~~Company~~following follows certain significant accounting policies when preparing its consolidated financial statements. A summary of these policies is included in Note 1 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Certain policies require the Company to make significant and subjective estimates and assumptions which are sensitive to deviations from actual results. In particularfactors, ~~the~~ ~~Company~~as ~~makes estimates regarding future undiscounted cash~~well ~~flows~~as ~~from~~factors ~~the~~described ~~use~~elsewhere ~~of long-lived assets, including goodwill,~~ in ~~assessing potential impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate~~ the ~~carrying value of a long~~Form 10-~~lived asset~~K, ~~may not be recoverable. Since there were no events~~ or ~~changes~~ in ~~circumstances~~other toSEC ~~indicate the carrying value of long-lived assets~~filings, ~~including~~ ~~goodwill,~~among ~~were impaired~~others, ~~the Company recorded~~could ~~no adjustment to~~cause the ~~carrying value~~ ~~of these assets. The~~ Company’s ~~does~~future ~~not~~results ~~expect events or circumstances~~ to ~~significantly~~differ ~~change,~~materially ~~thereby affecting~~from ~~the~~those ~~carrying~~expressed ~~value~~in ofany ~~long~~forward-~~lived~~looking ~~assets~~statements ~~with~~made ~~the~~by, ~~possible~~or ~~exception~~on ~~of the~~behalf ~~implementation~~ of, ~~Statement~~the NoCompany. ~~142.~~

~~In addition, the Company~~ ~~has~~These ~~estimated~~factors ~~the~~are ~~net~~described ~~realizable value of accounts receivable by evaluating the current pool of accounts receivable~~ in ~~light~~accordance ofwith ~~past experience and current knowledge of its customer base. The Company believes~~ the ~~reserves recorded~~provisions ~~in the financial statements are adequate for potential credit losses. It is possible the accuracy~~ of the ~~estimation~~Private ~~process~~Securities ~~could~~Litigation beReform ~~materially impacted~~Act ~~as the composition~~ of ~~this~~1995, ~~pool~~which ofencourages ~~accounts receivable~~companies ~~changes~~to ~~over~~disclose ~~time~~such ~~or if the health of the economy or the construction industry deteriorates~~factors.

~~Finally, the Company~~ ~~evaluates whether inventory is~~Competition. The ~~stated~~Company atexperiences ~~the~~intense ~~lower~~competition for sales of ~~cost~~its orprincipal ~~market~~products. The ~~based~~Company ~~on historical experience with the carrying value and~~has ~~life~~several major competitors in its markets, some of ~~inventory~~ which are larger and have more resources than the Company. The ~~assumptions used~~ inprincipal ~~this~~methods ~~evaluation~~and ~~are~~elements ~~based~~of onthe ~~current~~competition ~~market conditions~~include product quality, product breadth, product availability, price, credit terms and delivery services. Inherent risks in the Company ~~believes inventory~~’s iscompetitive ~~stated~~strategy atinclude uncertainties concerning the ~~lower~~effects of ~~cost~~consolidation orof ~~market~~suppliers inand distribution channels, the lack of barriers to entry and competitive reaction. Increased competition with respect to pricing would reduce revenue and could have an adverse impact on the Company’s financial ~~statements~~results.

~~Since~~Personnel. A ~~the~~key ~~Company’s working~~component ~~capital~~of ~~and~~our ~~equipment~~strategy ~~lines~~is ofto ~~credit~~provide ~~are~~value ~~variable~~to ~~rate~~our ~~notes,~~customers ~~the Company~~by isbuilding ~~exposed~~relationships toand ~~interest~~establishing ~~rate~~a ~~risk.~~trusting ~~Based~~working onenvironment ~~the~~between our customers and our staff. The Company’s ~~debt~~provides ~~at December~~competitive 31compensation, ~~2001~~benefits and ~~2000~~other factors that have attracted our current staff. In addition, anhiring ~~increase~~and training of ~~100~~additional ~~basis~~staff ~~points~~is ina ~~the~~key ~~United~~component ~~States prime~~to ~~rate~~our ~~would~~growth ~~have~~plans. However, ~~negatively~~there ~~impacted~~can be no assurance that our staff will remain employed by the Company’s, ~~net~~or ~~earnings~~that ~~for~~ the ~~years~~Company ~~then~~will ~~ended~~be byable ~~$33,000~~to hire and ~~$26,000,~~train ~~respectively~~replacement or additional staff. Loss of staff could have an adverse impact on the Company’s financial results.

~~Except for the historical~~ ~~information~~Cost ~~contained~~Savings ~~herein,~~Strategy. The ~~the~~Company’s ~~matters~~anticipated ~~set~~cost ~~forth~~savings ~~in this form 10-K~~ are ~~forward~~ ~~looking~~expected ~~and~~to ~~involve~~result afrom ~~number~~better ofpurchasing ~~risks~~ and ~~uncertainties.~~inventory ~~Among~~control ~~the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially are the following: the long-term impact of the September 11~~strategies, ~~2001,~~ ~~tragic~~productivity ~~events~~gains ~~on the commercial construction~~ and ~~domestic~~efforts ~~preparedness markets, the impact of insurance coverage on mold remediation jobs, adverse weather conditions, inability~~ to ~~hire~~reduce general and ~~train~~administrative ~~quality~~costs ~~people,~~without ~~changes~~sacrificing ~~in interest rates, unavailability of products and strong competition~~service. The ~~In addition, increases in oil prices or shortages in oil supply could significantly impact the~~ Company’s ~~petroleum~~ ~~based~~strategic ~~products~~investments ~~and~~in its ~~ability~~information tosystems ~~supply~~should ~~those~~also ~~products~~allow atfurther ~~a reasonable~~cost ~~price.~~savings ~~Furthermore,~~through ~~lack~~the ofstreamlining ~~acceptance~~ of ~~our~~its ~~e-commerce~~back ~~solution~~office ~~or an~~operations. However, ~~impairment~~there ofcan ~~goodwill~~be ~~resulting~~no ~~from~~assurance ~~the~~that ~~1999~~such ~~acquisitions~~cost ~~could~~savings ~~cause actual~~will ~~results~~be ~~to differ materially~~achieved.

~~The~~ Products. A ~~consolidated~~number ~~financial statements~~of the Company’s products, such as plastic sheeting and ~~supplementary~~bags, ~~data~~contain certain materials which are ~~included~~principally ~~under~~derived ~~Item~~from ~~14(a)(l)~~petroleum. These products are subject to price fluctuations based on changes in petroleum prices, availability and ~~(2)~~other factors. Significant increases in prices for these products, as we experienced in 2004, could adversely affect earnings if the Company does not or is unable to increase its selling price to customers or if adjustment to our selling price to customers significantly trails the increases in the cost of ~~this~~ ~~Report.~~the products to us.

~~PART~~ Although ~~III~~the Company believes that the suppliers of products needed to meet our demand are adequate, global economic and political conditions, especially in China, supplier capacity constraints, severe weather conditions and other factors could materially affect the availability of or prices for certain products.

~~This Item 10 is~~ incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than one hundred twenty (120) days after December 31, 2001. 9

~~This~~Fuel ~~Item~~Costs. We 11depend ~~is incorporated~~heavily ~~herein~~on bythird ~~reference~~party ~~from~~delivery ~~the~~services ~~Company’s~~as ~~definitive~~well ~~Proxy Statement~~as toour beown ~~filed~~fleet ~~with~~of delivery vehicles. Fuel costs are a component of the ~~Securities~~total ~~and~~cost ~~Exchange~~of ~~Commission~~product deliveries. Significant increases in oil prices could adversely affect earnings if the Company does not ~~later~~or ~~than one~~is ~~hundred~~unable ~~twenty~~to ~~(120)~~pass ~~days~~along ~~after~~these ~~December~~increases ~~31,~~to ~~2001~~customers.

~~This~~ Contingencies. Any ~~Item~~costs 12and ~~is incorporated~~other ~~herein~~effects byof ~~reference~~pending ~~from~~litigation against the Company’s ~~definitive~~cannot ~~Proxy Statement to~~ be ~~filed~~determined with ~~the~~certainty. Although ~~Securities~~management ~~and~~believes ~~Exchange~~that ~~Commission~~no ~~not~~such ~~later~~proceedings ~~than one~~will ~~hundred~~have ~~twenty~~a ~~(120)~~material ~~days~~adverse ~~after~~effect ~~December~~on 31the Company, ~~2001~~there can be no assurance that the outcome of such proceedings will be as expected. See Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

~~This~~ Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission not later than one hundred twenty (120) days after December 31, 20012. Properties.

~~PART~~ As IVof December 31, 2004, the Company leases and occupies approximately 174,000 square feet of industrial space. Included is approximately 8,100 square feet of office space for the Company’s headquarters which expires in February 2006. Also included is 5,000 square feet of space in Florida which expired in February 2005. Excluding the space in Florida, the Abatix branch facilities range in size from 9,090 square feet to 30,820 and have leases expiring between July 2005 and July 2010. IESI leases approximately 21,000 square feet of warehouse space.

~~The consolidated financial~~ ~~statements~~Item ~~and financial statement schedule listed on the index to consolidated financial statements on page F-l are filed as part of this Form l0-K~~3. Legal Proceedings.

~~(2)(a)~~ The ~~Agreement~~Company ofhas ~~Merger (filed~~been named in several class action lawsuits as ~~Exhibit~~detailed ~~(2)~~below. These tocomplaints generally allege that defendants violated the ~~Registration~~Securities ~~Statement~~and onExchange ~~Form~~Act ~~S-18~~of 1934 by allegedly making a series of materially false and purportedly misleading statements concerning Abatix’s business agreement with the Goodwin Group LLC and, ~~filed~~as ~~January 11~~a result, ~~1989)~~the price of the Abatix stock was allegedly artificially inflated causing plaintiff and other members of the class to allegedly suffer damages. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself against these allegations.

• On April 26, 2004, the Company and certain of its officers and directors were named as defendants in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas styled Family Medicine Specialists and Howard Kalnitsky, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs v. Abatix Corp., Terry Shaver, Frank Cinatl, IV and Gary Cox, Defendants (2304CV-872 D). • On April 30, 2004, the Company and certain of its officers and directors were named as defendants in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas styled David Maione, Individually And On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff vs. Abatix Corp and Terry Shaver, Defendants (b304 CV0926-P). ~~Asset~~• ~~Purchase Agreement~~On ~~(filed~~May 5, 2004, the Company and certain of its officers and directors were named as ~~Exhibit~~defendants in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas styled Eve Gelman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. Abatix Corporation, Terry Shaver and Frank Cinatl (24-04CV-341-A)~~(b)~~. to• On May 11, 2004, the ~~Report~~Company and certain of its officers and directors were named as defendants in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas styled Vincent Teal, individually and on ~~Form~~behalf 8of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. Abatix Corp., Terry Shaver, Frank Cinatl, IV and Gary Cox, Defendants (3-K04CV-1002P). • On May 21, 2004, the Company and an officer and director were named as defendants in a lawsuit filed ~~October~~in 19the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas styled John S. Rankin, ~~1992)~~ On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. Abatix Corp., and Terry Shaver Defendants (504CV 116).

~~(2)(c)~~ ~~Asset Purchase Agreement for Keliher Hardware Company (filed as exhibit (2)(c) to the Report on Form~~ 10~~-K for the year ended December 31, 1998).~~

~~(3)(a)(1)~~ ~~Certificate~~All of ~~Incorporation~~these ~~(filed~~lawsuits ashave ~~Exhibit~~been ~~(3)(a)(1)~~transferred to ~~the~~one ~~Registration Statement~~Federal onDistrict ~~Form~~Court ~~S-18,~~in ~~filed~~the ~~January~~Northern 11District of Texas, ~~1989;~~Dallas ~~filed~~Division ~~electronically~~and ashave ~~Exhibit 3(i)(a)~~been toconsolidated ~~the~~into ~~Form~~a ~~10-Q~~single ~~for~~case ~~the~~under ~~quarter~~Cause ~~ended~~No. 3-04CV-872-D; ~~December~~Family ~~31,~~Medicine ~~1995~~Specialists, ~~filed~~et ~~on November~~al 9v. Abatix, ~~1995).~~et al.

~~(3)(a)(2)~~ ~~Certificate~~On ofMay ~~Amendment~~27, of2004, ~~Certificate~~the officers and directors of ~~Incorporation~~Abatix ~~(filed~~Corp. were named as ~~Exhibit (3)(~~defendants in a~~)(2)~~ tolawsuit filed in the ~~Registration~~District ~~Statement~~Court onof ~~Form~~Dallas ~~S-18~~County, ~~filed~~Texas, ~~January~~162nd ~~11,~~Judicial ~~1989~~District styled Daniel M. Johnson Plaintiff v. Terry Shaver; ~~filed~~ ~~electronically~~Frank asCinatl ~~Exhibit~~IV; 3Gary L Cox; Donald N. Black; Eric A. Young; and A. David Cook; Defendants v. Abatix Corp. Nominal Defendant (iCause No. 2004-04-4841)~~(b)~~, toalthough Plaintiff has dismissed A. David Cook from this case since Mr. Cook was not a director of the ~~Form~~Company ~~10-Q~~at ~~for~~the time of the ~~quarter~~alleged ~~ended December~~actions. This 31suit is a shareholder derivative action that alleges that all of the defendants breached certain fiduciary duties and abused their control of Abatix. In that regard, ~~1995~~the plaintiff seeks contribution and indemnification. In addition, ~~filed~~this petition alleges that Donald Black, an outside board of director of Abatix, breached his fiduciary duties by selling securities based on ~~November~~allegedly 9material, ~~1995)~~non-public information and by allegedly misappropriation of information. Plaintiff has agreed to abate this case; however, Plaintiff has the right to lift the abatement and pursue these claims with 15 days notice.

~~(3)(a)(3)~~ ~~Certificate~~Other ofthan ~~Amendment~~the ofapplicable ~~Certificate~~policy ofdeductible ~~Incorporation~~and ~~(filed~~the asfees ~~Exhibit (3)(i)(c)~~and expenses incurred prior to provision of notice to the ~~Form~~insurance ~~10-Q~~carrier, the insurance company has paid for the ~~quarter~~defense ~~ended~~costs ~~December~~related ~~31,~~to ~~1995,~~the ~~filed November~~SEC 9,inquiry ~~1995;~~and ~~filed~~the ~~electronically~~class asaction ~~Exhibit~~and ~~3(i)(c)~~derivative lawsuits. At this time, it is not possible to predict whether the ~~Form~~Company ~~10-Q~~will ~~for the~~have ~~quarter~~any ~~ended~~additional ~~December~~liability ~~31,~~or ~~1995,~~to ~~filed~~estimate onadditional ~~November~~costs 9,that ~~1995).~~may be incurred with such actions that may not be covered by any applicable insurance policy.

~~(3)(b) Bylaws~~Item ~~(filed~~4. Submission asof ~~Exhibit~~Matters ~~(3)(b)~~ to ~~the~~a ~~Registration~~Vote ~~Statement~~of onSecurity ~~Form S-18, filed January 11, 1989; filed electronically as Exhibit 3(ii) to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 1995, filed on November 9, 1995)~~Holders.

~~(4)(a)~~ ~~Specimen Certificate of Common Stock (filed as Exhibit (4)(a) to the Registration Statement on Form S-18, filed January 8, 1989).~~ None

~~(4)(b)~~ ~~Specimen of Redeemable Common Stock Purchase Warrant (filed as Exhibit (4)(b) to the Registration Statement on Form S-18, filed February 9, 1989).~~ 11

~~(10)(e)~~ ~~Demand~~PART ~~Credit Facility with Comerica Bank-Texas dated June 15, 1989 (filed as Exhibit (10)(e) to the Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended June 30, 1989, filed August 11, 1989).~~ II

~~(10)(e)(i) Demand~~Item ~~Credit~~5. ~~Facility~~Market ~~with~~for ~~Comerica~~the ~~Bank-Texas~~Registrant’s ~~dated~~Common ~~March 1~~Stock, ~~1993~~Related ~~(filed~~Stockholder ~~as Exhibit~~Matters ~~(10)(e)(i)~~and toIssuer ~~the~~Purchases ~~Report~~of onEquity ~~Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1992)~~Securities.

(10a)~~(e)(ii) Demand~~ The ~~Credit~~Company’s ~~Facility~~common ~~with~~stock ~~Comerica~~trades ~~Bank-Texas~~on ~~extension,~~The ~~renewal~~Nasdaq ~~and~~SmallCap ~~increase dated~~Market ~~June~~tier 1,of ~~1993~~The ~~(filed~~Nasdaq asStock ~~Exhibit~~Market ~~(10)(e)(ii)~~under tothe symbol “ABIX”. The following table sets forth the ~~Report~~high onand ~~Form~~low ~~10-K~~bid prices for the ~~year~~common ~~ended~~stock ~~December~~for ~~31,~~the ~~1993)~~periods indicated. These quotations reflect prices between dealers, do not include retail mark-ups, mark-downs or commissions and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

(10)(e)(iii) Demand Credit Facility with Comerica Bank-Texas extension, renewal and increase dated September 22, 1994 (filed as Exhibit (10)(e)(iii) to the Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994).

	Common Stock Bid Price

	High		Low

2003
First Quarter	$	8.50	$	5.01
Second Quarter		6.24		4.20
Third Quarter		5.29		3.97
Fourth Quarter		4.32		3.45
2004
First Quarter	$	6.74	$	3.76
Second Quarter		16.75		3.00
Third Quarter		4.53		2.11
Fourth Quarter		14.75		2.55

~~(22) Information~~On ~~Statement~~March ~~dated~~21, ~~September 1~~2005, ~~1995 (filed as Exhibit (22) to~~ the ~~Report~~ onclosing ~~Form~~price ~~10-K~~ for the ~~year~~common ~~ended~~stock ~~December~~was ~~31, 1995)~~$7.24.

~~SIGNATURES~~ (b) As of March 21, 2005, the approximate number of holders of record of the Company’s common stock was estimated to be 200.

~~Pursuant~~ (c) The toCompany ~~the requirements~~has ofnever ~~Section~~paid 13cash ordividends ~~15(d)~~on ofits ~~the~~common ~~Securities~~stock. Future ~~Exchange~~dividend ~~Act~~policy ofwill ~~1934,~~depend on the ~~Registrant~~ ~~has~~Company’s ~~duly~~earnings, ~~caused~~capital ~~this~~requirements, ~~Report~~expansion toplans, befinancial ~~signed~~conditions, ontax ~~its~~laws ~~behalf~~and byother ~~the undersigned;~~relevant ~~thereunto~~factors. The ~~duly~~Company ~~authorized,~~currently ondoes ~~the~~not ~~20th~~anticipate ~~day~~paying ofcash ~~March,~~dividends ~~2002.~~for the foreseeable future.

~~ABATIX CORP.~~ ~~By:~~(d) The ~~/s/~~Company ~~Terry~~does W.not ~~Shaver ------------------- Terry~~currently W.have ~~Shaver President,~~any ~~Chief~~equity ~~Executive~~compensation ~~Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)~~ plans.

~~Pursuant~~ (e) The toCompany ~~the requirements~~does ofnot ~~the~~currently ~~Securities~~have ~~Exchange~~an ~~Act~~active ofshare ~~1934,~~repurchase ~~this~~program ~~Report~~and has ~~been~~not ~~signed below~~repurchased byany ~~the following persons on behalf~~ of ~~the~~its ~~Registrant,~~common ~~and~~stock insince ~~the capacities and on the date indicated~~1999.

~~Signatures Title Date~~ ---------- ----- ---- /s/ Terry W. Shaver President, Chief Executive Officer March 20, 2002 Terry W. Shaver and Director (Principal Executive Officer) /s/ Gary L. Cox Executive Vice President, March 20, 2002 Gary L. Cox Chief Operating Officer and Director /s/ Daniel M. Birnley Director March 20, 2002 Daniel M. Birnley /s/ Donald N. Black Director March 20, 2002 Donald N. Black /s/ Eric A. Young Director March 20, 2002 Eric A. Young /s/ Frank J. Cinatl Vice President, Chief Financial Officer March 20, 2002 Frank J. Cinatl, IV and Director (Principal Accounting Officer) 12

~~ABATIX~~ Item ~~CORP~~6. Selected ~~AND SUBSIDIARY Index to Consolidated~~ Financial ~~Statements~~Data.

~~Page~~ ~~---- Independent~~The ~~Auditors'~~tables ~~Report F-2 Financial~~below ~~Statements: Consolidated~~set ~~Balance~~forth, ~~Sheets~~in assummary ~~of December 31~~form, ~~2001~~selected ~~and~~financial ~~2000 F-3 Consolidated~~data ~~Statements~~ of ~~Operations for~~ the ~~years~~Company. This ~~ended December 31~~data, ~~2001,~~which ~~2000~~is ~~and~~not ~~1999 F-4 Consolidated~~covered ~~Statements~~by ofthe ~~Stockholders'~~report ~~Equity~~of ~~for~~ the ~~years ended~~independent ~~December~~registered ~~31,~~public ~~2001~~accounting firm, ~~2000~~should ~~and~~be ~~1999 F-5 Consolidated~~read ~~Statements~~in ofconjunction ~~Cash~~with ~~Flows for~~ the ~~years~~consolidated ~~ended December~~financial ~~31,~~statements ~~2001, 2000~~ and ~~1999 F-6 Notes~~notes tothereto ~~Consolidated~~which ~~Financial~~are ~~Statements F-7 Financial~~included ~~Statement~~elsewhere ~~Schedule: II~~herein -(amounts ~~Valuation~~in ~~and~~thousands ~~Qualifying~~except ~~Accounts~~per ~~for~~share ~~the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 S-1~~ amounts).

All other schedules have been omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information required is presented in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.

	Year Ended December 31,

	2004^a		2003^b		2002^c			2001^c		2000

Selected Operating Results:
Net sales	$	52,892	$	48,893	$	59,801		$	54,726	$	47,987

Gross profit	$	14,370	$	14,050	$	17,437		$	15,384	$	12,982

Earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	214	$	61	$	1,345		$	1,206	$	598
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle ^d		—		—		(492	)		—		—

Net earnings	$	214	$	61	$	853		$	1,206	$	598

Basic and diluted net earnings per common share:
Earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	.13	$	.04	$	.79		$	.70	$	.35
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle ^d		—		—		(.29	)		—		—

Net earnings	$	.13	$	.04	$	.50		$	.70	$	.35

Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding		1,711		1,711		1,711			1,711		1,711

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT

	As of December 31,

	2004		2003		2002		2001		2000

Selected Balance Sheet Data:
Current assets	$	17,837	$	14,617	$	15,602	$	14,529	$	12,075
Current liabilities		10,306		7,590		8,461		8,603		7,411
Total assets		19,272		16,342		17,152		16,441		14,042
Total liabilities		10,306		7,590		8,461		8,603		7,411
Retained earnings		8,646		8,432		8,371		7,518		6,312
Stockholders’ equity		8,966		8,752		8,691		7,838		6,631

a The 2004 results include the increase in sales related to the cleanup efforts from the three hurricanes in Florida. b Sales to mold related jobs declined significantly in 2003. c The 2001 and 2002 results include the increase in sales related to the affects of Tropical Storm Allison in Texas. In addition, the Company, primarily in the Texas markets, experienced a significant growth in sales related to the increased awareness of toxic molds in homes and buildings. d The cumulative effect of change in accounting principle resulted from the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board Statement of ~~Directors~~Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 “Goodwill and ~~Stockholders Abatix~~Other ~~Corp~~Intangible Assets.:”

We have audited the consolidated financial statements of Abatix Corp. and subsidiary as listed in the accompanying index. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements we also have audited the financial statement schedule as listed in the accompanying index. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule based on our audits. 13

WeItem ~~conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America~~7. ~~Those~~Management’s ~~standards~~Discussion ~~require that we plan~~ and ~~perform~~Analysis ~~the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free~~ of ~~material misstatement.~~Financial AnCondition ~~audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts~~ and ~~disclosures~~Results inof ~~the financial statements~~Operations. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

~~In our opinion, the~~ consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Abatix Corp. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2001 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. Introduction

~~KPMG~~ The ~~LLP~~Company is a supplier of mainly safety related products and tools to workers involved in the construction, manufacturing and homeland security markets. From seven fully-stocked distribution facilities/sales offices in the western and southwestern part of the United States the Company primarily distributes commodity products to the local geographic areas surrounding its facilities.

~~Dallas~~ IESI, ~~Texas March~~the 1Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, ~~2002~~imports disposable clothing from China. IESI sells their product throughout the United States through the Abatix distribution channels, as well as through other distributors.

~~ABATIX~~ The ~~CORP.~~Company’s ~~AND~~management ~~SUBSIDIARY Consolidated~~believes ~~Balance~~that ~~Sheets December~~hiring 31additional sales staff, ~~2001~~controlling costs, geographic expansion, diversification of customer base and ~~2000~~responding effectively to competitive challenges are important to the long-term success of the Company.

Assets 2001 2000 ------ ---------------- -------------- Current• ~~assets: Cash $ 13,843 $ 5,678 Trade~~Sales ~~accounts~~Staff ~~receivable,~~– ~~net~~We ofsell ~~allowance~~our ~~for~~products ~~doubtful~~based ~~accounts~~on ~~of $447~~relationships,~~037~~ inamong ~~2001~~other ~~and~~things. ~~$559~~Our ability to hire,~~963~~ intrain ~~2000~~and ~~(note~~retain ~~4) 7~~staff,~~452,983 6,371,419 Inventories~~ ~~(note~~especially ~~4) 6,170,810 5,124,727 Prepaid~~in ~~expenses~~the sales and ~~other~~customer ~~assets 716,974 296,254 Deferred~~service ~~income~~area ~~taxes~~is ~~(note~~critical ~~5) 174,738 277,170~~ to our long-~~--------------- -------------- Total~~term ~~current~~success. ~~assets 14,529,348 12,075,248 Receivables~~Our ~~from~~current ~~officers~~competitive compensation and ~~employees 7~~benefits,~~676 14,933 Property~~ ~~and~~including ~~equipment~~updating these items when necessary, ~~net~~as ~~(notes~~well 3as ~~and~~a ~~4) 903,675 716,993 Deferred~~good ~~income~~work-life ~~taxes~~balance ~~(note~~are ~~5) 115,781 197,180 Goodwill,~~critical ~~net~~to ofthis ~~accumulated~~area. ~~amortization~~• ofControlling ~~$406~~Costs – To maintain our competitive position by providing competitively priced products while also maintaining our profitability,~~795~~ inwe ~~2001~~ must control our costs and ~~$249,275~~effectively inutilize ~~2000 819,841 977,361 Other~~our assets 64. During 2004 we reviewed,~~850 60~~ and will continue to review in 2005,722 ---------------- -------------- $ 16,441,171 $ 14,042,437 ================ ============== Liabilities our general and ~~Stockholders'~~administrative ~~Equity ------------------------------------ Current~~costs ~~liabilities: Notes~~making ~~payable~~adjustments where appropriate. Our ability to ~~bank~~control ~~(note~~costs ~~4) $ 5,358,513 $ 4,334,852 Accounts~~can ~~payable 2,163,379 2,418,470 Accrued~~be ~~compensation 324,169 158,668 Other~~affected ~~accrued~~by ~~expenses 757~~outside factors,~~431 499,119 ---------------- -------------- Total~~ ~~current~~such ~~liabilities 8~~as the price of oil or increases in interest rates. In addition,~~603,492 7,411,109 ---------------- -------------- Stockholders'~~ ~~equity~~the ~~(note~~cost ~~6): Preferred~~to ~~stock~~comply with Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley $1is ~~par~~expected ~~value,~~to approximate $500,000 ~~shares~~which ~~authorized;~~would ~~none~~negate ~~issued - - Common~~most ~~stock~~of -our $cost reduction efforts to date.~~001~~ ~~par~~• ~~value,~~Geographic ~~5,000,000~~Expansion ~~shares~~– ~~authorized;~~The ~~issued 2,437,314~~Company ~~shares~~needs into ~~2001~~leverage our infrastructure and ~~2000 2,437 2,437 Additional~~knowledge ~~paid-~~over a larger revenue base. While the Company intends to focus on growing revenues in ~~capital 2~~its existing locations,~~574~~ the Company will also explore geographic expansion. • Customer Base – While no customer represents 10% or more of the Company’s revenues,~~560 2,574,560 Retained~~ ~~earnings 7~~there are several large customers,~~518,024 6,311,673 Treasury~~ ~~stock~~especially at ~~cost,~~IESI. ~~726,166~~The ~~common~~loss ~~shares~~of one or more of those customers would have an impact on our revenue and profitability. The Company intends to pursue additional customers and cultivate current customers in ~~2001~~an attempt to lessen the impact of any one customer. • Competitive Environment – Past results and ~~2000 (2,257,342) (2,257,342)~~ future prospects are significantly affected by the competitive environment in which we operate. We experience intense competition for sales of our products in all of our markets. Our competition ranges from small owner-~~--------------- -------------- Total~~operator ~~stockholders'~~distributors ~~equity 7,837,679 6,631,328 Commitments~~to large national retail chains selling to the construction industry and ~~contingencies (note~~large 10) ---------------- -------------- $ 16national companies selling to the construction and industrial industries. Typically,~~441~~ the smaller companies are built around very strong relationships which make it hard to penetrate,~~171 $ 14,042,437 ================ ==============~~ while the larger companies have a distinct geographic and price advantage.

ABATIX CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY Consolidated Statements of Operations Years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 199914

~~2001 2000 1999~~ ~~---------------- ---------------- ---------------- Net~~Other ~~sales $ 54,726,290 $ 47,986,591 $ 44,576,180 Cost~~than ofhistorical sales 39,342,062 35,004,764 32,358,985 ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- Grossand ~~profit 15~~factual statements,~~384,228 12,981,827 12,217,195 Selling,~~ ~~general~~the matters and ~~administrative~~items ~~expenses (12,990,978) (11,394,760) (11,083,429)~~ discussed herein are forward-~~--------------- ---------------- ---------------- Operating~~looking ~~profit 2,393,250 1,587,067 1,133,766 Other~~statements ~~income~~that ~~(expense): Interest~~involve ~~expense (380,139) (561,826) (386,856) Other,~~risks net (27,349) 2,372 13,009 ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- Earningsand ~~before~~uncertainties. Actual ~~income~~results ~~taxes 1,985,762 1,027,613 759,919 Income~~of ~~tax~~the ~~expense~~Company ~~(note~~may ~~5) (779~~differ materially from the results discussed herein. Certain,~~411) (429,699) (298,461) ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- Net~~ ~~earnings $ 1~~but not all,~~206,351 $ 597,914 $ 461,458 ================ ================ ================ Basic~~ ~~and~~factors ~~diluted~~that ~~earnings~~could ~~per~~contribute ~~common~~to ~~share $~~ such differences are discussed throughout this report.~~70 $ .35 $ .26 ================ ================ ================ Basic~~ We ~~and~~do ~~diluted~~not ~~weighted~~undertake ~~average~~any ~~shares~~obligation ~~outstanding 1~~to publicly update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events,~~711,148 1,711,148 1,779,029 ================ ================ ================~~ except as required by law or regulation.

~~ABATIX CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY~~ ~~Consolidated~~Overview ~~Statements~~ of ~~Stockholders'~~2004 ~~Equity Years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999~~Results

~~Common~~• ~~Stock Additional Treasury~~Net Stock ----------------------- Paid-in Retained -------------------------- Total Shares Amount Capital Earnings Shares Amount Equity ---------- --------- ----------- ---------- ---------- -------------- ------------ Balancesales atincreased ~~December~~8% ~~31,~~when ~~1998 2,413,814 $ 2,414 $ 2,498,508 $~~compared ~~5,252,301 517,700~~to ~~$ (1,566,067) $ 6,187,156 Stock~~2003. ~~issued~~• ~~for~~Gross ~~the~~profit ~~Purchase of~~increased ~~Keliher Hardware (note~~ 2~~) 23,500 23 76,052 - - - 76,075 Purchase~~% ofwhen ~~treasury~~compared ~~stock - - - - 185,700 (611,594) (611,594) Stock received~~ to ~~repay~~2003. ~~debt from~~• ~~officer - - - - 22~~Selling,~~766 (79,681) (79,681) Net~~ earnings - - - 461,458 - - 461,458 ---------- --------- ----------- ---------- ---------- -------------- ------------ Balancegeneral atand ~~December~~administrative ~~31,~~costs ~~1999 2,437,314 2,437 2,574,560 5,713,759 726,166 (2,257,342) 6,033,414 Net~~were earnings - - - 597,914 - - 597,914 ---------- --------- ----------- ---------- ---------- -------------- ------------ Balanceessentially atthe ~~December~~same ~~31,~~as ~~2000 2,437,314 2,437 2,574,560 6,311,673 726,166 (2,257,342) 6,631,328 Net~~2003. earnings - - - 1,206,351 - - 1,206,351 ---------- --------- ----------- ---------- ---------- -------------- ------------ Balance• atNet ~~December~~income ~~31,~~of ~~2001 2,437,314~~ $ 2214,~~437 $ 2,574,560 $~~000 ~~7,518,024 726,166~~increased $ (2153,~~257,342) $ 7,837,679 ========== ========= =========== ========== ========== ============== ============~~ 000 when compared to 2003.

~~ABATIX~~ This ~~CORP.~~discussion ~~AND~~and ~~SUBSIDIARY Consolidated~~analysis ~~Statements~~of our results of ~~Cash~~operations ~~Flows Years~~and ~~ended~~financial ~~December~~condition ~~31,~~is ~~2001~~intended to provide investors with an understanding of the Company’s recent performance, ~~2000~~its financial condition and ~~1999~~its prospects. We will discuss and provide our analysis of the following:

~~2001 2000 1999 ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- Cash~~• ~~flows~~Results from operating activities: Net earnings $ 1,206,351 $ 597,914 $ 461,458 Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Depreciation and amortization 590,731 521,888 469,032 Deferred income taxes 183,831 (93,929) (116,798) Provision for losses on receivables 79,536 85,247 125,370 Provision for obsolescence of ~~inventory 168,878 95,823 89,823 Gain~~Operations ~~on disposal of assets (19,158) (5,974) (19,609) Changes in operating assets~~ and ~~liabilities,~~Related ~~net~~Information ~~of business~~• acquisitions: Receivables (1,161,100) 571,605 (413,178) Inventories (1,214,961) 172,805 (474,104) RefundableLiquidity ~~income taxes - 87,986 (87,986) Prepaid expenses~~ and ~~other~~Capital ~~assets (420,720) 72,329 64,968 Other~~Resources ~~assets,~~• ~~primarily~~Critical ~~deposits (4,128) 6,251 (30,515) Accounts~~Accounting ~~payable (255,091) (186,117) 556,542 Accrued~~Policies expenses 423,813 (83,299) (96,221) ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- Net• ~~cash~~New ~~(used~~Accounting ~~in)~~Standards ~~provided~~• by operating activities (422,018) 1,842,529 528,782 ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- Cash flows from investing activities: Purchase of property and equipment (620,679) (476,238) (444,642) Proceeds from sale of property and equipment 19,944 30,646 35,750 Business ~~acquisitions,~~Outlook ~~net~~• ofInformation ~~cash~~Concerning ~~acquired (note 2)~~ Forward- ~~- (2,160,574) Advances~~Looking to officers and employees (20,043) (39,162) (63,897) Collection of advances to officers and employees 27,300 31,979 60,170 ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- Net cash used in investing activities (593,478) (452,775) (2,573,193) ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- Cash flows from financing activities: Purchase of treasury stock - - (611,594) Borrowings on notes payable to bank 17,226,585 14,137,514 19,927,926 Repayments on notes payable to bank (16,202,924) (15,628,383) (17,389,125) ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities 1,023,661 (1,490,869) 1,927,207 ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- Net increase (decrease) in cash 8,165 (101,115) (117,204) Cash at beginning of year 5,678 106,793 223,997 ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- Cash at end of year $ 13,843 $ 5,678 $ 106,793 ================= ================= ================= Statements

~~ABATIX CORP AND SUBSIDIARY~~ ~~Notes~~Results toof ~~Consolidated~~Operations ~~Financial~~and ~~Statements~~Related Information

~~Abatix~~ 2004 ~~Corp.~~Compared ~~(“Abatix”)~~With and subsidiary (collectively, the “Company”) market and distribute personal protection and safety equipment and durable and nondurable supplies to the environmental industry, the industrial safety industry and, combined with tools and tool supplies, the construction industry. At December 31, 2001, the Company operated seven sales and distribution centers in five states. The Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, International Enviroguard Systems, Inc. (“IESI”) imports disposable protective clothing products sold through the Company’s distribution channels and through other distributors.2003

~~The~~ Net preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.Sales

~~The~~ Consolidated ~~accompanying~~net ~~consolidated~~sales ~~financial~~increased ~~statements~~8% ~~include~~to ~~the~~$52,892,000 ~~accounts~~from of2003. The Abatix ~~and~~operating ~~IESI.~~segment ~~All~~net ~~significant~~sales ~~intercompany~~increased ~~accounts~~7% ~~and~~to ~~transactions~~$50,106,000, ~~have~~while ~~been~~the ~~eliminated~~IESI inoperating ~~consolidation.~~segment ~~Certain~~net ~~prior~~sales ~~year~~increased ~~amounts~~42% ~~have~~to ~~been reclassified for consistency in presentation~~$2,786,000.

~~Inventories~~• ~~consist~~The ofincrease ~~materials~~in ~~and~~sales ~~equipment~~at ~~for~~the ~~resale~~Abatix ~~and~~operating ~~are~~segment ~~stated~~resulted atfrom: o increased sales to the ~~lower~~restoration market as a result of ~~cost~~the orhurricanes in Florida, o increased sales to the homeland security market. ~~Cost~~as isAbatix ~~determined~~was bysuccessful aon ~~method~~several ~~that~~governmental ~~approximates~~bids, and o increased sales to the ~~first-in~~industrial manufacturing market, ~~first-out~~as ~~method~~spending from manufacturing facilities have increased due to the economic recovery. • The increase in sales at the IESI operating segment resulted from market penetration at a few key customers and those customers’ ability to capture market share from competitors’ products.

~~Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided by the straight– line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.~~ 15

~~The~~Gross Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.Profit

~~Revenue~~ Consolidated isgross ~~recognized~~profit ~~when~~of ~~the~~$14,370,000 ~~goods~~increased ~~are~~2% ~~shipped~~from 2003. Expressed ~~Shipping~~as ~~fees~~a ~~billed~~percentage toof ~~customers are included in net~~ sales., ~~The~~gross ~~costs~~profit ~~related~~was to27% ~~this~~and ~~revenue~~29% ~~which are included~~ in ~~selling,~~2004 ~~general~~ and ~~administrative expense~~2003, ~~were $1,026,400, $965,019 and $826,634 for the years December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999~~respectively.

~~Basic~~• ~~earnings~~The ~~per~~increase ~~share~~in isgross ~~calculated~~profit ~~using~~dollars ~~the~~is ~~weighted~~a ~~average~~result ~~number~~ of ~~common~~higher ~~shares~~sales ~~outstanding~~volume ~~during~~to ~~each~~the ~~year,~~restoration ~~while~~and ~~diluted~~homeland ~~earnings~~security ~~per~~markets. ~~share~~• ~~includes~~The ~~the~~decrease ~~effects~~in ofthe ~~all~~gross ~~dilutive~~profit ~~potential~~rate ~~common~~is ~~shares.~~a Asresult of: ~~December~~o ~~31,~~increased ~~2001,~~sales ~~2000~~to ~~and~~homeland ~~1999,~~security ~~there~~customers ~~were~~which nohave ~~dilutive~~been ~~securities~~at ~~outstanding.~~lower ~~Basic~~margins, ~~earnings per share~~ and ~~diluted~~o ~~earnings~~competitive ~~per~~pressures ~~share~~in ~~amounts~~several ~~were~~of ~~equal for~~ the ~~years~~Company’s ~~ended~~markets ~~December~~resulting ~~31,~~in ~~2001,~~lower ~~2000, and 1999~~margins.

~~For purposes of the Statements of Cash Flows~~ Selling, ~~the~~General ~~Company~~and ~~considers~~Administrative ~~all highly liquid debt instruments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company held no cash equivalents at December 31, 2001 or 2000.~~Expenses

The Company paid interest of $393,602, $565,933 and $362,249 in 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively, and income taxes of $524,176, $352,562 and $637,957 in 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively.

Selling, general and administrative expenses of $13,720,000 increased slightly over 2003. The significant changes are:
•	lower labor costs (8%) as a result of adjustments to staffing levels since the third quarter of 2003, partially offset by
•	increased legal costs related to the ongoing litigation.

~~The~~ Expressed ~~Company~~as ~~accounts~~a ~~for~~percentage ~~income~~of ~~taxes~~sales, ~~using~~S,G&A ~~the~~expenses ~~asset~~were 26% and ~~liability~~28% ~~method. Under this method the Company records deferred income taxes~~ for ~~the~~2004 ~~temporary differences between the financial reporting basis~~ and ~~the~~2003, ~~tax basis of assets and liabilities at~~respectively.

~~enacted~~ Additional ~~tax~~Statement ~~rates~~of ~~expected~~Operations to be in effect when such amounts are realized or settled. The resulting deferred tax liabilities and assets are adjusted to reflect changes in tax laws or rates in the period that includes the enactment date.Commentary

Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired. Amortization is provided using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives of three and ten years.

•	Operating profit of 1.2% of sales for 2004 improved from 0.7% of sales in 2003. The Abatix segment operating profit of 0.3% of sales for 2004 improved from an operating loss of (0.1%) of sales in 2003. The IESI segment operating profit of 18.3% of sales in 2004 declined from 19.8% in 2003.
	o	The improvement at the Abatix segment is a result of higher sales volumes without a corresponding increase in general and administrative costs, partially offset by lower product margins.
	o	The decline at the IESI segment is primarily a result of lower product margins, partially offset by higher sales volume without a corresponding increase in general and administrative costs.
•	Interest expense of $243,000 increased approximately $64,000 from 2003 primarily due to higher line of credit balances and higher interest rates.
•	Our effective tax rate was 48% in 2004, which compared with 60% in 2003. Although the effective rate in 2004 is lower than 2003, it is higher than normal as a result of the following.
	o	Certain federal deductions are added back to arrive at taxable income for Texas franchise tax purposes. At lower pre-tax income levels, these add-backs are more pronounced.
	o	2004 includes a $20,000 additional tax expense as a result of an adjustment to the 2001 tax year.
•	Net earnings of $214,000 or $.13 per share increased $153,000 from net earnings of $61,000 or $.04 per share in 2003. The increase in net earnings is primarily due to the higher sales volume, partially offset by lower margins.

The Company assesses the recoverability of goodwill by determining whether the amortization of the asset balance over its remaining life can be recovered through undiscounted future operating cash flows of the acquired operation. The amount of impairment, if any, is measured based on projected discounted future operating cash flows using a discount rate commensurate with that attainable by the Company for secured borrowings.16

In 2003 ~~July~~Compared ~~2001,~~With the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (Statement) No. 141, “Business Combinations.” Statement No. 141 requires the purchase method of accounting for business combinations initiated after June 30, 2001 and eliminates the pooling-of-interests method. The Company believes that the adoption of Statement No. 141 will not have a significant impact on its financial statements.2002

In Net July 2001, the FASB issued Statement No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001. Statement No. 142 requires, among other things, the discontinuance of goodwill amortization. In addition, the standard includes provisions for testing impairment of existing goodwill and other intangibles. Upon adoption of Statement 142, the Company will cease to amortize approximately $820,000 of goodwill. The Company recorded $110,540 of amortization on this goodwill during 2001 and would have recorded the same amount during 2002. In addition, the Company will be required to perform an impairment review of its goodwill balance upon the initial adoption of Statement No. 142.Sales

The Company expects to complete this impairment review during the first quarter of 2002. Based on preliminary calculations, the Company estimates it will record an impairment charge of approximately $820,000 (unaudited). Any charge resulting from this initial impairment test is considered transitional impairment and will be presented on the Consolidated Statement of Operations as a cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of applicable income taxes.

Consolidated net sales decreased 18% to $48,893,000 from 2002. The Abatix operating segment net sales decreased 19% to $46,933,000, while the IESI operating segment net sales decreased 3% to $1,961,000.
•	The decrease in sales at the Abatix operating segment resulted from the following.
	o	Insurance coverage related to molds in homes and buildings throughout the U.S. declined. In 2002, the Texas Insurance Commission limited the insurance companies’ liability related to mold which would naturally decrease the number of mold related jobs performed by our customers. Between the fourth quarter 2002 and the second quarter 2003, the Company experienced a 60% decline in mold remediation sales which translated to approximately 20% of the Company’s overall revenue.
	o	General U.S. economic conditions and the real estate conditions in our local markets were still sluggish.
•	The decrease in sales at the IESI operating segment resulted from the loss of business at two large customers, partially offset by adding new customers during the year. The loss of business resulted from one customer being purchased and the other customer losing a large contract which used IESI products.

~~The~~ Gross FASB issued Statement 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations” in August 2001. Statement 143 requires an enterprise to record the fair value of an asset retirement obligation as a liability in the period in which it incurs a legal obligation associated with the retirement of a tangible long-lived asset. Statement 143 also requires the enterprise to record the contra to the initial obligation as an increase to the carrying amount of the related long-lived asset and to depreciate that cost over the remaining useful life of the asset. Statement 143 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2002. The Company does not believe it will have a material impact on the operations of the Company.Profit

InConsolidated ~~October~~gross ~~2001,~~profit ~~the~~of ~~FASB issued Statement 144~~$14,050,000 ~~“Accounting~~decreased ~~For~~19% ~~the~~from ~~Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets~~2002.” ~~Statement~~Expressed ~~144~~as ~~has~~a ~~broadened~~percentage ~~the presentation~~ of ~~discontinued operations to include more disposal transactions~~sales, ~~and~~gross ~~has~~profit ~~enhanced~~was ~~management’s~~29% ~~ability~~in toboth ~~provide~~2003 ~~information~~and ~~that~~2002. ~~helps~~• ~~financial~~The ~~statement~~decrease ~~users~~in togross ~~assess~~profit ~~the~~dollars ~~effects~~is of a ~~disposal~~result ~~transaction on the ongoing operations~~ of anlower ~~entity.~~sales ~~Statement 144 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15~~volume, ~~2001~~primarily ~~and~~to ~~interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company does not believe it will have a material impact on~~ the ~~operations~~restoration ~~of the Company~~market.

~~Effective January 1~~ Selling, ~~1999,~~General the Company consummated an asset purchase agreement with Keliher Hardware Company, a California corporation, pursuant to which the Company assumed the operations of Keliher. Keliher, based in Los Angeles, California, is an industrial supply distributor, primarily for the construction and ~~industrial~~Administrative markets. The estimated fair value of the assets acquired was approximately $975,000. The aggregate purchase price was settled with the assumption of certain liabilities (approximately $900,000), the issuance of 23,500 shares of the Company’s $.001 par value common stock at a value of $3.45 per share and $35,000 in cash. This acquisition has been accounted for using the purchase method of accounting and, accordingly, results of Keliher’s operations are included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements since the acquisition date. The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired is being amortized on a straight-line basis over three years. At December 31, 2001, the Keliher acquisition goodwill is fully amortized.Expenses

~~On April 6~~Selling, ~~1999,~~general ~~the~~and ~~Company~~administrative ~~closed~~expenses ~~its~~of ~~Denver~~$13,719,000 ~~sales~~decreased ~~and~~9% ~~distribution~~from ~~center~~2002. The ~~Denver~~significant ~~facility~~changes ~~had~~in ~~sales~~these ofcosts ~~$353,000~~are ~~for~~as ~~the~~follows: ~~year~~• ~~ended~~Lower ~~December~~selling 31costs, ~~1999.~~primarily ~~Expenses~~commissions, ~~related~~as toa ~~the~~result ~~closing~~ of ~~this~~the ~~location~~lower ~~were~~sales ~~not material~~volume.

~~Effective~~Expressed ~~June~~as 1,a ~~1999,~~percentage ~~the Company consummated an asset purchase agreement with North State Supply Co.~~ of ~~Phoenix~~sales, ~~an Arizona corporation~~S,G&A ~~pursuant~~expenses towere ~~which~~28% ~~the~~and ~~Company~~25% ~~assumed~~for ~~the~~2003 ~~operations~~and ~~of North State~~2002, arespectively. ~~construction~~• ~~supply~~This ~~distributor.~~increase ~~The~~is ~~estimated~~a ~~fair~~result ~~value~~ of the ~~assets~~inability ~~acquired~~to ~~was~~lower ~~approximately~~fixed ~~$1,800,000.~~costs ~~The~~sufficiently ~~aggregate purchase price was settled with the assumption of certain liabilities (approximately $785,000)~~ and ~~approximately~~quickly ~~$2,100,000~~enough into ~~cash.~~offset ~~This acquisition has been accounted for using~~ the ~~purchase~~18% ~~method~~decline ~~of accounting and, accordingly, the results of North State’s operations are included~~ in ~~the Company’s consolidated financial statements since the acquisition date~~revenue. ~~The excess of the purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired is being amortized on a straight-line basis over ten years.~~

~~Property and equipment consists of the following at December 31, 2001 and 2000:~~ 17

~~Estimated~~ ~~Useful~~Additional ~~Life 2001 2000 ---------------- -------------- -------------- Furniture~~Statement ~~and~~of ~~equipment 3~~Operations - 8 years $ 2,439,216 $ 2,512,994 Transportation equipment 3 - 5 years 462,807 523,743 Leasehold improvements 3 - 5 years 164,476 153,966 -------------- -------------- 3,066,499 3,190,703 Less accumulated depreciation and amortization 2,162,824 2,473,710 -------------- -------------- Net property and equipment $ 903,675 $ 716,993 ============== ============== Commentary

At December 31, 2001, the Company had two lines of credit with a bank. The working capital facility allows the Company to borrow up to 80 percent of the book value of eligible trade receivables plus the lesser of 40 percent of eligible inventory or $2,000,000, up to a maximum of $8,000,000. Under this formula, the Company had the ability to borrow $7,689,000 at December 31, 2001, of which approximately $5,277,000 was used. A capital equipment facility provides for individual borrowings, aggregating up to $550,000, at 80 percent of the purchased equipment’s cost. At December 31, 2001, the Company had borrowed approximately $81,000 on this facility. Each borrowing under the capital equipment line is due on the earlier of demand or in terms ranging from thirty-six to sixty monthly installments of principal and interest. Both credit facilities are payable on demand and bear a variable rate of interest computed at the prime rate. As of December 31, 2001 and 2000, the Company’s rate of interest on these agreements was 4.75 percent and 9.5 percent, respectively. These credit facilities are secured by accounts receivable, inventories and equipment.

•	Operating profit of 0.7% of sales for 2003 declined from 4.1% of sales in 2002. The Abatix segment operating loss of (0.1%) of sales for 2003 declined from an operating profit of 3.5% of sales in 2002. The IESI segment operating profit of 19.8% of sales in 2003 increased from 18.7% in 2002.
	o	The decline at the Abatix segment was from lower sales volumes as a result of the decline in mold jobs and lower product margins without a corresponding decrease in general and administrative costs.
	o	The increase at the IESI segment was primarily a result of improved product margins.
•	Interest expense of $179,000 decreased approximately $52,000 from 2002 primarily due to lower interest rates and lower borrowings.
•	Our effective tax rate was 60% in 2003, which compared with 39% in 2002. This higher rate is a result of the following.
	o	Certain federal deductions are added back to income in calculating the Texas franchise tax. At lower pre-tax income levels, as in 2003, these add-backs are more pronounced.
•	In the first quarter of 2002, the Company implemented Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“Statement”) No. 142. As required by Statement No. 142, the Company, upon adoption, ceased amortizing goodwill and performed an impairment review of its goodwill balance. Based on the review performed, the Company recorded a goodwill impairment charge for the full amount of $819,841, net of an income tax benefit of $327,900.
•	Net earnings of $61,000 or $.04 per share decreased $792,000 from net earnings of $853,000 or $.50 per share in 2002. The decrease in net earnings is primarily due to the lower sales volume in 2003 without a corresponding decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses.

~~Income~~Liquidity ~~tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000~~ and ~~1999~~Capital ~~consists of:~~Resources

                                                      2001               2000               1999
                                                 ---------------    ---------------    ---------------
  Current:
     Federal                                  $     494,613      $      424,224     $      342,903
     State                                          100,967              99,404             72,355
  Deferred:
     Federal                                        156,256             (77,366)           (88,946)
     State                                           27,575             (16,563)           (27,851)
                                                 ---------------    ---------------    ---------------

 Total income tax expense                     $     779,411      $      429,699     $      298,461
                                                 ===============    ===============    ===============

Cash used in operations during 2004 of $691,000 compared to cash provided by operations during 2003 of $1,247,000.
•	Accounts receivable increased 30% over December 2003 and 20% since June 2004 as a result of higher sales in the last half of 2004. Sales in the third and fourth quarters of 2004 were approximately 17% and 29% higher, respectively, than in the same periods in 2003.
•	Inventory increased 21% since December 2003 as a result of:
	o	an increase in stocking levels ahead of price increases on several products, and
	o	inventory stocked in the temporary Florida sales and distribution center to support the clean up from the hurricanes.
•	These uses of cash were funded primarily from an increase in accounts payable and borrowings on the Company’s working capital line of credit.

ACash ~~reconciliation~~requirements for investing activities during 2004 of ~~expected~~$163,000 ~~federal~~decreased ~~income~~by ~~tax~~$466,000 ~~expense~~when ~~(based~~compared onto 2003. These requirements were primarily the ~~U.S.~~purchase ~~corporate~~of ~~income~~computer ~~tax~~hardware ~~rate~~and software and leasehold improvements. Purchases of 34property ~~percent)~~and toequipment ~~actual~~in ~~income~~2004 ~~tax~~were lower than normal primarily because of the significant expense ~~for~~in 2003 related to the ~~years~~Company’s ~~ended~~new ~~December~~computer ~~31,~~system. Purchases ~~2001~~in 2005 are estimated to be less than $400,000 ~~2000~~and will primarily include replacement of vehicles and ~~1999~~computers, ~~follows:~~and potentially some additional productivity software.

~~2001 2000 1999~~ --------------- -------------- -------------- Expected income tax expense $ 675,159 $ 349,388 $ 258,372 State income taxes, net of related federal tax benefit 94,214 65,536 29,373 Nondeductible meals, entertainment expense 15,609 15,402 10,667 Other (5,571) (627) 49 --------------- -------------- -------------- Actual income tax expense $ 779,411 $ 429,699 $ 298,461 =============== ============== ============== 18

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2001 and 2000 follow:

The Company has an $8,000,000 working capital line of credit and a $500,000 capital equipment credit facility.
•	Based on the borrowing formula calculated as of December 31, 2004, the Company had the capacity to borrow up to the maximum of $8,000,000 on its working capital line.
•	As of March 21, 2005, there are advances of $4,721,000 outstanding on the working capital credit facility.
•	As of March 21, 2005 there are advances of $36,000 outstanding on the capital equipment credit facility.
•	Both credit facilities are payable on demand and bear a variable rate of interest tied to the prime rate.

~~2001 2000 --------------- --------------- Deferred~~Contractual tax assets: Allowance for doubtful accounts $ 178,815 $ 223,985 Inventory reserve 136,993 73,587 Goodwill, due to differences in amortization periods 38,970 150,666 Property and equipment, principally due to differences in depreciation 76,811 46,514 --------------- --------------- Total gross deferred tax assets 431,589 494,752 Deferred tax liabilities - prepaid expenses (141,070) (20,402) --------------- --------------- Net deferred tax assets $ 290,519 $ 474,350 =============== =============== Obligations

~~Management~~ The ~~has~~following ~~determined,~~table ~~based~~presents on the Company’s ~~history~~total ofcontractual ~~prior~~obligations ~~operating~~as ~~earnings and its expectations for the future, that operating earnings will more likely than not be sufficient to realize the benefit~~ of ~~the deferred tax assets. Accordingly~~December 31, 2004 ~~the~~for ~~Company~~which ~~has~~cash ~~not~~flows ~~provided~~are afixed ~~valuation~~or ~~allowance~~determinable ~~for deferred tax assets~~ (in ~~any period presented~~thousands).

The Board of Directors has authorized the acquisition of up to 726,500 shares of the Company’s common stock. As of February 28, 2002, the Company has acquired 726,166 shares and does not intend to acquire any additional shares for the foreseeable future. Included in these shares is a block of 102,600 shares purchased in March 1999, a block of 51,000 shares purchased in October 1999, and 22,766 shares received from an officer of the Company in January 1999 as payment for monies owed to the Company of $79,681. All of these shares are held as treasury shares.

	2005		2006		2007		2008		2009		2010		Total

Contractual obligations:
Operating leases	$	1,135	$	659	$	365	$	132	$	118	$	118	$	2,527
Working capital line of credit		5,496		—		—		—		—		—		5,496
Equipment notes		35		10		—		—		—		—		45
Employment contracts		584		584		—		—		—		—		1,168
Open purchase orders		1,556		—		—		—		—		—		1,556
Office equipment leases		22		15		7		7		4		—		55

Total contractual obligations	$	8,828	$	1,268	$	372	$	139	$	122	$	118	$	10,847

The Company has a 401(k) profit sharing plan, under which eligible employees may request the Company to deduct and contribute a portion of their compensation to the plan. The Company may also, at its discretion, match a portion of employee contributions to the plan. Contributions by the Company to the 401(k) plan aggregated $50,046, $46,346 and $42,366 during 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.

Commentary:
•	The Company’s working capital line of credit agreement includes a feature that allows the bank to call the debt; therefore, the debt is classified as a current liability on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and included above. This line of credit contains no defined payment schedule.
•	The Company’s equipment notes are comprised of term notes of 36 to 60 months in length. Certain term notes also have a call feature, and are therefore classified as current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
•	The employment agreements with the Chief Executive, Operating and Financial Officers were effective on January 1, 2005 and expire on December 31, 2006.
•	The open purchase orders represent amounts the Company anticipates will become payable within the next year for saleable product.

The reported amounts of financial instruments such as cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of their short maturity. The carrying value of notes payable to bank approximates fair value because these instruments bear interest at current market rates. 19

~~Identification~~ Critical ofAccounting operating segments is based principally upon differences in the types and distribution channel of products. The Company’s reportable segments consist of Abatix and IESI. The Abatix operating segment includes seven aggregated branches, principally engaged in distributing environmental, safety and construction supplies to contractors and industrial manufacturing facilities in the western half of the United States and the Company’s corporate operations. The IESI operating segment, which consists of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, International Enviroguard Systems, Inc., is engaged in the wholesale distribution of disposable protective clothing to companies similar to, and including, Abatix. The IESI operating segment distributes products throughout the United States.Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting ~~policies~~principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the ~~operating~~date ~~segments~~of ~~are~~the financial statements and the ~~same~~reported asamounts ~~those~~of ~~described~~net sales and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates, and changes in ~~Note~~these 1estimates are recorded when known. The critical accounting policies used by management in the preparation of the ~~Notes~~Company’s consolidated financial statements are those that are important both to ~~Consolidated~~the ~~Financial~~presentation ~~Statements.~~of ~~The~~the Company’s ~~evaluates~~financial ~~the~~condition ~~performance~~and results of ~~its~~operations ~~operating~~and ~~segments~~require ~~based~~significant onjudgments ~~earnings~~by ~~before~~management ~~income~~with ~~taxes~~regard to estimates used. The critical judgments by management relate to excess and ~~accounting~~obsolete ~~changes~~inventory, allowance for doubtful accounts, depreciation, amortization and ~~after~~impairment antesting ~~allocation~~for ofproperty ~~corporate~~and ~~expenses~~equipment, and deferred tax assets and potential income tax assessments. The ~~Intersegment~~Company’s ~~sales~~critical ~~are~~accounting atpolicies ~~agreed~~have ~~upon~~been ~~pricing~~reviewed ~~and~~with ~~intersegment~~the ~~profits~~Audit ~~are~~Committee ~~eliminated~~of inthe ~~consolidation~~Board of Directors.

~~Summarized~~Excess ~~financial~~and ~~information~~Obsolete ~~concerning the Company’s reportable segments is shown in the following table. There are no other significant noncash items.~~Inventory

~~Abatix IESI Totals~~ ~~---------------- ----------------- ------------------ 2001 ---------------------------------------------- Sales~~The ~~from~~Company ~~external~~evaluates ~~customer $52,461,190 $2,265,100 $54,726,290 Intersegment~~whether ~~sales - 566,315 566,315 Interest~~inventory ~~expense 380,139 - 380,139 Depreciation~~is ~~and~~stated ~~amortization 586,873 3,858 590,731 Segment~~at ~~profit 1,725,611 281,622 2,007,233 Segment~~the ~~assets 16,175,026 631,150 16,806,176 Capital~~lower ~~expenditures 620,679 - 620,679 2000 ---------------------------------------------- Sales~~of ~~from~~cost ~~external~~or ~~customers $44,145,042 $3,841,549 $47,986,591 Intersegment~~market ~~sales - 579,733 579,733 Interest~~based ~~income 689 - 689 Interest~~on ~~expense 561,826 - 561,826 Depreciation~~historical experience with the carrying value and ~~amortization 514,538 7,350 521,888 Segment~~life ~~profit 661,051 362,239 1,023,290 Segment~~of ~~assets 13,705,980 439,444 14,145,424 Capital~~inventory. The ~~expenditures 474,700 1,538 476,238 1999 ---------------------------------------------- Sales~~assumptions ~~from~~used ~~external~~in ~~customers $42,146,862 $2,429,318 $44,576,180 Intersegment~~this ~~sales - 876,734 876,734 Interest~~evaluation ~~income 573 - 573 Interest~~are ~~expense 386,856 - 386,856 Depreciation~~based on current market conditions and ~~amortization 461,924 7,108 469,032 Segment~~the ~~profit 478,441 292,862 771,303 Segment~~Company ~~assets 15,141,406 712,996 15,854,402 Capital~~believes ~~expenditures 439,941 4,701 444,642~~ inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market in the financial statements.

~~Below~~ Allowance is a reconciliation of (i) total segment profit to earnings before income taxes on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, and (ii) total segment assets to total assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets for ~~all~~Doubtful ~~periods presented. The sales from external customers represent the net sales on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.~~Accounts

~~2001 2000 1999~~ ~~----------------- ----------------- ----------------- Profit~~The ~~for~~Company ~~reportable~~has ~~segments $2,007,233 $ 1,023,290 $ 771,303 Elimination~~estimated the net realizable value of intersegment profits (21,471) 4,323 (11,384) ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- Earningsaccounts ~~before~~receivable ~~income~~by ~~taxes $1,985,762 $ 1,027,613 $ 759,919 ================= ================= ================= Total~~evaluating ~~assets~~the current pool of accounts receivable in light of past experience and current knowledge of its customer base. The Company believes the reserves recorded in the financial statements are adequate for ~~reportable segments $16,806,176 $14,145,424 $15,854,402 Elimination~~potential credit losses. It is possible the accuracy of ~~intersegment~~the ~~assets (365,005) (102,987) (649,594) ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- Total~~estimation ~~assets $16~~process could be materially impacted as the composition of this pool of accounts receivable changes over time or if the health of the economy,~~441,171 $14,042,437 $15,204,808 ================= ================= =================~~ its customers or the markets served by the Company deteriorates.

~~The Company’s sales~~ Depreciation, ~~substantially~~Amortization ~~all of which are on an unsecured credit basis, are to various customers from its distribution centers in Texas, California, Arizona, Washington~~ and ~~Nevada.~~Impairment ~~The~~Testing ~~Company evaluates credit risks on an individual basis before extending credit to its customers and it believes the allowance~~ for ~~doubtful~~Property ~~accounts adequately provides for loss on uncollectible accounts. During 2001, 2000~~ and 1999, no single customer accounted for more than 10 percent of net sales, although sales to environmental contractors were approximately 49 percent, 37 percent, and 43 percent of consolidated net sales in 2001, 2000, and 1999, respectively. A reduction in spending on environmental projects could significantly impact sales.Equipment

~~Although~~ Estimating nothe ~~vendor~~useful ~~accounted~~lives ~~for~~of ~~more~~property, ~~than~~plant 10and ~~percent~~equipment requires the exercise of ~~purchases~~management judgment, ~~one~~and ~~product~~actual ~~class~~lives ~~accounted~~may ~~for~~differ ~~approximately~~from 14these ~~percent,~~estimates. Changes 13to ~~percent~~these initial useful life estimates would be made if and when appropriate. Property, plant and 16equipment ~~percent~~are oftested ~~net~~for ~~sales~~impairment in ~~2001,~~accordance ~~2000~~with Statement No. 144, ~~and~~Accounting ~~1999~~for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, ~~respectively.~~whenever Aevents ~~major~~or ~~component~~changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amounts of ~~these~~such ~~products~~long-lived isassets ~~petroleum~~may not be recoverable from future net pretax cash flows. Impairment ~~Increases~~testing inrequires ~~oil~~significant ~~prices~~management orjudgment ~~shortages~~including inestimating ~~supply~~the ~~could~~future ~~significantly~~success ~~impact~~of product lines and facilities, future sales volumes, growth rates for selling prices and costs, alternative uses for the assets and estimated proceeds from disposal of the assets. The Company’s ~~ability~~makes toestimates ~~supply~~regarding ~~its~~future ~~customers~~undiscounted ~~with~~cash ~~certain~~flows ~~products~~from atthe ause ~~reasonable~~of ~~price.~~long-lived assets in assessing potential impairment whenever events or

The Company leases warehouse and office facilities under long-term noncancelable operating leases expiring at various dates through November 2006. The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments under these leases as of December 31, 2001:20

~~2002 $ 1,001,538~~ ~~2003 867,821 2004 822,187 2005 313,007 2006 109,685~~ changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value of a long-lived asset may not be recoverable. Since there were no events or changes in circumstances to indicate the carrying value of long-~~-------------- $ 3~~lived assets were impaired,~~114~~ the Company recorded no adjustment to the carrying value of these assets. The Company does not expect events or circumstances to significantly change,~~238 ================~~ thereby affecting the carrying value of long-lived assets.

~~Rental~~ Deferred ~~expense~~Tax ~~under~~Assets ~~operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000~~ and ~~1999~~Potential ~~was~~Income ~~$1,016,209,~~Tax ~~$950,199 and $776,435, respectively.~~Assessments

~~The~~ As of December 31, 2004, the Company has ~~employment~~recorded ~~agreements~~a ~~with~~net ~~three~~deferred ~~key~~tax ~~employees~~asset. In determining the valuation allowances to establish against these deferred tax assets, ~~all~~if ofany, ~~which~~the ~~expire~~Company inconsiders ~~2002.~~many ~~The~~factors, ~~agreements~~including ~~provide~~the ~~for~~specific ~~minimum~~taxing ~~aggregate~~jurisdiction, ~~cash~~income ~~compensation~~tax instrategies ~~2002~~and forecasted earnings. A valuation allowance is recognized if, based on the weight of ~~$414~~available evidence,~~500~~ the Company concludes that it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.

~~Quarter~~ --------------------------------------------------------------------- First Second Third Fourth Total ----------------The ~~-----------------~~Company ~~-----------------~~records ~~----------------~~liabilities ~~----------------- 2001 ---------------------------- Net~~in ~~sales $12~~current income taxes for potential assessments resulting from tax audits. Any accruals relate to uncertain tax positions in,~~132,882 $14,782,809 $14,569,000 $13,241,599 $54,726,290 Gross~~ ~~profit 3~~potentially,~~387,469 4,019,440 4,103,185 3,874,134 15,384,228 Operating~~ ~~profit 457~~a variety of taxing jurisdictions and are based on what management believes will be the ultimate resolution of these positions. These liabilities may be affected by changing interpretations of laws,~~541 719,418 731,638 484,653 2,393,250 Net~~ ~~earnings 196~~rulings by tax authorities,~~073 368,279 382,936 259,063 1,206,351 Basic~~ ~~and~~or ~~diluted earnings~~the ~~per common~~expiration ~~share~~ of the statute of limitations.11 The Company’s U.22 S.~~22 .15 .70 2000 ---------------------------- Net~~ ~~sales $11,361,744 $13,220,965 $12,353,517 $11,050,365 $47,986,591 Gross~~federal ~~profit 3,169,854 3,566,964 3,332,820 2,912,189 12,981,827 Operating~~income ~~profit 232,444 647,973 517,994 188,656 1,587,067 Net~~tax ~~earnings 52~~returns have been audited through 2001 and all federal assessments of additional taxes,~~307 301,903 223,304 20,400 597,914 Basic~~ interest and ~~diluted earnings~~penalties ~~per common~~have ~~share~~ been paid through 2001.~~03 .18 .13 .01 .35~~

~~Schedule~~ New IIAccounting Standards

~~ABATIX~~ In ~~CORP~~November 2004, FASB issued Statement No. ~~AND~~151, ~~SUBSIDIARY Valuation~~“Inventory ~~and~~Costs ~~Qualifying~~– ~~Accounts Years~~an ~~ended~~amendment ~~December~~of 31ARB No. 43, ~~2001~~Chapter 4.” Statement No. 151 requires that abnormal amounts of costs, ~~2000~~including idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and ~~1999~~spoilage, should be recognized as current period charges. The provisions of this Statement are effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not expect the adoption of this Statement to have a material impact on its financial statements.

~~Additions Balance~~In ~~at charged~~December 2004, FASB issued Statement No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets – an amendment of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 29.” Statement No. 153 amends APB Opinion No. 29 to ~~beginning~~ eliminate the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of ~~costs~~ similar productive assets and ~~Balance~~ ~~at year expenses Other Deductions end~~replaces ofit ~~year -------------- -------------- ------------- --------------- ------------ Year~~with ~~ended~~a ~~December~~general ~~31: Allowance~~exception for ~~Doubtful~~exchanges ~~Accounts: 2001 $ 559,963 79,536 - 192,462~~ of nonmonetary assets that do not have a commercial substance. A $ 447,037 ============== =============== ============= =============== ============ 2000 $ 616,678 85,247 - 141,962 A $ 559,963 ============== =============== ============= =============== ============ 1999 $ 514,696 125,370 - 23,388 A $ 616,678 ============== =============== ============= =============== ============ Inventory ~~Reserve: 2001 $ 288~~nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. The provisions of this Statement are effective for nonmonetary exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15,409 168,878 - 65,362 C $ 391,925 ============== =============== ============= =============== ============ 2000 $ 205,222 95,823 - 12,636 C $ 288,409 ============== =============== ============= =============== ============ 1999 $ 69,321 89,823 109,993 B 63,915 C $ 205,222 ============== =============== ============= =============== ============ 2005. The Company does not expect the adoption of this Statement to have a material impact on its financial statements.

In December 2004, FASB issued Statement No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment.” Statement No. 123R revises Statement No. 123, supersedes APB Opinion No. 25 and amends Statement No. 95. Statement No. 123R requires the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. The provisions of this Statement are effective for public entities that do not file as small business issuers as of the beginning of the first interim period or annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. The Company does not expect the adoption of this Statement to have a material impact on its financial statements.

Business Outlook

Our goal for 2005 is to produce revenue growth, exclusive of the non-recurring revenues in Florida in 2004, as it is vital to our long-term success.
•	We are anticipating some improvement in the industrial manufacturing and construction markets as the general economy and, in particular, the real estate market, continue to improve.
•	We anticipate growth in the environmental market, and in particular, the restoration subset of that market. Year over year growth will be difficult when the positive impact of the Florida hurricanes is included in 2004.
•	The homeland security segment is expected to continue to grow in 2005. The growth in this market to date has been with the public sector and generally is at lower margins than the remainder of the Company’s markets. We are hopeful the private sector will spend more money on homeland security products as general economic conditions improve; however, there is not much evidence to support the private sector will begin to spend on our homeland security products. In response to these issues, the Company has lowered its cost structure to support this market.
•	Hiring of additional sales staff will be critical for long-term growth of the Company.
•	Diversification of our customer base, especially at the IESI segment, will also help provide more consistent results. Although no customers are more than 5% of our revenues, we have several large customers, the loss of which would impact our sales and profitability. The growth at the IESI segment was primarily generated by three customers. We are focused on helping all of our customers grow, as well as adding to our customer base.
•	New locations and acquisitions will most likely be critical for the long-term growth of the Company. Although we are not certain if and when we will open new locations, we are currently evaluating certain markets as possibilities. We are not currently evaluating any acquisitions.

Overall margins for 2005 are anticipated to remain at their current levels.
•	We are utilizing certain tools and reporting from our new computer system in an effort to enhance margins. In addition, these tools and reporting should allow us to identify issues that can be addressed more quickly, thereby minimizing possible margin erosion.
•	We are evaluating the consolidation of certain vendors to gain access to better pricing.
•	We are evaluating alternative sourcing vehicles to enhance our purchasing process.
•	However, further competitive pressures or changes in the customer or product mix could negatively impact any and all efforts by the Company to maintain or improve product margins.

The Company will need to further reduce costs to stay competitive and improve on its profitability.
•	We intend to continue evaluating costs, including labor related costs, rent and freight which make up approximately 75% of our selling, general and administrative costs, to ensure our cost structure is in line with our revenue stream and supports our business model.

•	Unless revenues improve significantly and are sustainable, S,G&A expenses are estimated to remain in their current range for 2005.
•	The Company’s credit facilities are variable rate notes tied to the lending institution’s prime rate. Increases in the prime rate could negatively affect the Company’s earnings.

Depending on many factors, including the timing of sales, cash flow from operations for the entire year of 2005 is expected to be positive as the Company collects the receivables from the sales increase in the last half of 2004, improvements are made to inventory and purchasing and there is further refinement in our cost structure.
•	Unless the Company employs a more aggressive growth strategy, management believes the Company’s current credit facilities, together with cash provided by operations, will be sufficient for its capital and liquidity requirements for the next twelve months.
•	The Company’s accounts receivable collection days have leveled off over the past twelve months after increasing slightly in the eighteen months prior. The increase was primarily a result of the sharp decrease in sales to restoration contractors. The Company took steps to protect our interests in certain receivables and believes its allowance for bad debts is sufficient to cover any anticipated losses.
•	The Company’s inventory turns have also leveled off over the past twelve months after declining the eighteen months prior. The decline was primarily a result of the sharp decrease in sales to restoration contractors and the increase in inventory to support a customer. Sales to this customer have improved, but have been slow to reach the projected levels.
•	A new location would require approximately $100,000 in fixed asset purchases, comprised of computers, office furniture, warehouse racking and potentially a delivery vehicle. In addition, cash will also be required to stock this location with product and to finance the customers’ purchases. Cash flow from operations and borrowings on our lines of credit will be used to finance any new location.
•	Unless the Company’s stock could be used as currency, any acquisitions would most likely require the raising of capital as the borrowing capacity on the lines of credit and the cash flow from operations would most likely not be sufficient to support an acquisition of reasonable size.
•	The Company currently estimates that it will incur approximately $500,000 in additional costs related to the implementation of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. These costs will be incurred over 2005 and 2006.

Information Concerning Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements contained herein, among other things, are of a forward-looking nature relating to future events or the future business performance of Abatix. Such statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties including, without limitation, global, national and local economic and political conditions; changes in laws and regulations relating to the Company’s products and the import of such products; the outcome of litigation; market acceptance of new products, existence or development of competitive products the Company represents as a distributor that outperform current product lines or are priced more competitively; inability to hire and train quality people or retain current employees; changes in interest rates; the financial status of key customers and vendors; efforts to control and/or reduce costs; adverse weather conditions; significant changes in oil prices; or the Company’s success in the process of management’s assessment and auditor

attestation of internal controls, as required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. We do not undertake any obligation to publicly update forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events, except as required by law or regulation.

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

Since the Company’s working capital and equipment lines of credit are variable rate notes, the Company is exposed to interest rate risk. Based on the Company’s debt at December 31, 2004 and 2003, an increase of 100 basis points in the United States prime rate would have negatively impacted the Company’s net earnings for the years then ended by $27,000 and $18,000, respectively.

Item 8. Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

The consolidated financial statements and supplementary data are included under Item 15(a)(l) and (2) of this Report.

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

None

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

As of December 31, 2004, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2004. There have been no significant changes during the period covered by this report in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect internal control over financial reporting.

Item 9B. Other Information.

None.

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant.

This Item 10 is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC not later than one hundred twenty (120) days after December 31, 2004.

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

This Item 11 is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC not later than one hundred twenty (120) days after December 31, 2004.

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

This Item 12 is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC not later than one hundred twenty (120) days after December 31, 2004.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.

This Item 13 is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC not later than one hundred twenty (120) days after December 31, 2004.

Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services.

This Item 14 is incorporated herein by reference from the Company’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC not later than one hundred twenty (120) days after December 31, 2004.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a) Documents filed as part of this report.

1 and 2. Consolidated Financial Statements and Financial Statement Schedule

The consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule listed on the index to consolidated financial statements on page F-l are filed as part of this Form l0-K.

3. Exhibits

(2)(a)	Agreement of Merger filed as Exhibit (2) to the Registration Statement on Form S-18, filed January 11, 1989, and herein incorporated by reference.

(2)(b)	Asset Purchase Agreement filed as Exhibit (2)(b) to the Report on Form 8-K, filed October 19, 1992, and herein incorporated by reference.

(2)(c)	Asset Purchase Agreement for Keliher Hardware Company filed as exhibit (2)(c) to the Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, and herein incorporated by reference.

(2)(d)	Asset Purchase Agreement for North State Supply Co. of Phoenix filed with Report on Form 8-K on June 15, 1999, and herein incorporated by reference.

(3)(a)(1)	Certificate of Incorporation filed as Exhibit (3)(a)(1) to the Registration Statement on Form S-18, filed January 11, 1989; filed electronically as Exhibit 3(i)(a) to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 1995, filed on November 9, 1995, and herein incorporated by reference.

(3)(a)(2)	Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation filed as Exhibit (3)(a)(2) to the Registration Statement on Form S-18, filed January 11, 1989; filed electronically as Exhibit 3(i)(b) to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 1995, filed on November 9, 1995, and herein incorporated by reference.

(3)(a)(3)	Certificate of Amendment of Certificate of Incorporation filed as Exhibit (3)(i)(c) to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 1995, filed November 9, 1995; filed electronically as Exhibit 3(i)(c) to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 1995, filed on November 9, 1995, and herein incorporated by reference.

(3)(b)	Bylaws filed as Exhibit (3)(b) to the Registration Statement on Form S-18, filed January 11, 1989; filed electronically as Exhibit 3(ii) to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended December 31, 1995, filed on November 9, 1995, and herein incorporated by reference.

(4)(a)	Specimen Certificate of Common Stock filed as Exhibit (4)(a) to the Registration Statement on Form S-18, filed January 8, 1989, and herein incorporated by reference.

(4)(b)	Specimen of Redeemable Common Stock Purchase Warrant filed as Exhibit (4)(b) to the Registration Statement on Form S-18, filed February 9, 1989, and herein incorporated by reference.
(10)(a)(v)	Employment Agreement with Terry W. Shaver effective January 1, 2005.*

(10)(b)(v)	Employment Agreement with Gary L. Cox effective January 1, 2005.*

(10)(c)(i)	Employment Agreement with Frank J. Cinatl, IV effective January 1, 2005.*

(10)(e)(iii)	Demand Credit Facility with Comerica Bank-Texas extension, renewal and increase dated September 22, 1994 filed as Exhibit (10)(e)(iii) to the Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994, and herein incorporated by reference.

(14)	Code of Business Conduct and Ethics for Directors, Officers and Employees.*

(22)	Information Statement dated September 1, 1995 filed as Exhibit (22) to the Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1995, and herein incorporated by reference.

(31)(a)	Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).*

(31)(b)	Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act.*

(32)(a)	Certification of Chief Executive Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.*

(32)(b)	Certification of Chief Financial Officer required by Rule 13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.*


*	Filed herewith as part of the Company’s electronic filing.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned; thereunto duly authorized, on the 24^th day of March, 2005.

	ABATIX CORP.

	By:	/s/ TERRY W. SHAVER

		Terry W. Shaver
		President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

Signatures	Title	Date

/s/ TERRY W. SHAVER	President, Chief Executive Officer	March 24, 2005
	and Director (Principal Executive Officer)
Terry W. Shaver

/s/ GARY L. COX	Executive Vice President,	March 24, 2005
	Chief Operating Officer and Director
Gary L. Cox

/s/ FRANK J. CINATL	Vice President and Chief Financial Officer	March 24, 2005
	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
Frank J. Cinatl, IV

/s/ DONALD N. BLACK	Director	March 24, 2005

Donald N. Black

/s/ ERIC A. YOUNG	Director	March 24, 2005

Eric A. Young

/s/ A. DAVID COOK	Director	March 24, 2005

A. David Cook

ABATIX CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

		Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm		F-2

Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2004 and 2003		F-3

Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002		F-4

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002		F-5

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002		F-6

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements		F-7

Financial Statement Schedule:
II - Valuation and Qualifying Accounts for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002		S-1

All other schedules have been omitted as the required information is inapplicable.

F-1

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders
Abatix Corp.:

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Abatix Corp. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004. In connection with our audits of the consolidated financial statements we also have audited the financial statement schedule as listed in the accompanying index. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements and the financial statement schedule based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements and related schedules. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Abatix Corp. and subsidiary as of December 31, 2004 and 2003, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2004, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

	KPMG LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 14, 2005

F-2

ABATIX CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2004 and 2003

	2004			2003

Assets
Current assets:
Cash	$	338,443		$	176,078
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $368,874 in 2004 and $277,830 in 2003		9,303,140			7,187,563
Inventories		7,199,841			5,954,414
Prepaid expenses and other assets		680,745			842,498
Refundable income taxes		—			204,894
Deferred income taxes (note 4)		309,841			251,522
Receivables from employees		5,427			—

Total current assets		17,837,437			14,616,969
Property and equipment, net (note 2)		987,694			1,293,608
Deferred income taxes (note 4)		364,343			350,748
Other assets		82,450			80,450

	$	19,271,924		$	16,341,775

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
Current liabilities:
Notes payable (note 3)	$	5,539,736		$	4,523,290
Accounts payable		3,618,564			2,510,319
Accrued compensation		131,935			117,849
Other accrued expenses		1,015,473			438,266

Total current liabilities		10,305,708			7,589,724

Stockholders’ equity (note 5):
Preferred stock - $1 par value, 500,000 shares authorized; none issued		—			—
Common stock - $.001 par value, 5,000,000 shares authorized; issued 2,437,314 shares in 2004 and 2003		2,437			2,437
Additional paid-in capital		2,574,560			2,574,560
Retained earnings		8,646,561			8,432,396
Treasury stock at cost, 726,166 common shares in 2004 and 2003		(2,257,342	)		(2,257,342	)

Total stockholders’ equity		8,966,216			8,752,051
Commitments and contingencies (note 9)

	$	19,271,924		$	16,341,775

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-3

ABATIX CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Operations
Years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

	2004			2003			2002

Net sales	$	52,892,213		$	48,893,420		$	59,801,175
Cost of sales		38,521,908			34,843,222			42,364,236

Gross profit		14,370,305			14,050,198			17,436,939
Selling, general and administrative expenses		(13,719,943	)		(13,718,525	)		(14,999,741	)

Operating profit		650,362			331,673			2,437,198
Other income (expense):
Interest expense		(242,643	)		(178,857	)		(230,605	)
Other, net		1,763			773			2,212

Earnings before income taxes		409,482			153,589			2,208,805
Income tax expense (note 4)		(195,317	)		(92,398	)		(863,683	)

Earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		214,165			61,191			1,345,122
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax of $327,900 (note 1)		—			—			(491,941	)

Net earnings	$	214,165		$	61,191		$	853,181

Basic and diluted earnings per common share:
Earnings before cumulative effect of change in accounting principle	$	.13		$	.04		$	.79
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax (note 1)		—			—			(.29	)

Net earnings	$	.13		$	.04		$	.50

Basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding		1,711,148			1,711,148			1,711,148

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-4

ABATIX CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
Years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

	Common Stock				Additional Paid-in Capital				Treasury Stock
							Retained Earnings							Total Equity
	Shares		Amount						Shares		Amount

Balance at December 31, 2001		2,437,314	$	2,437	$	2,574,560	$	7,518,024		726,166	$	(2,257,342	)	$	7,837,679
Net earnings		—		—		—		853,181		—		—			853,181

Balance at December 31, 2002		2,437,314		2,437		2,574,560		8,371,205		726,166		(2,257,342	)		8,690,860
Net earnings		—		—		—		61,191		—		—			61,191

Balance at December 31, 2003		2,437,314		2,437		2,574,560		8,432,396		726,166		(2,257,342	)		8,752,051
Net earnings		—		—		—		214,165		—		—			214,165

Balance at December 31, 2004		2,437,314	$	2,437	$	2,574,560	$	8,646,561		726,166	$	(2,257,342	)	$	8,966,216

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-5

ABATIX CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

	2004			2003			2002

Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings	$	214,165		$	61,191		$	853,181
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle		—			—			819,841
Depreciation and amortization		462,437			426,318			469,125
Deferred income taxes		(71,914	)		(5,556	)		(306,195	)
Provision for losses on receivables		416,026			265,289			134,911
Provision for obsolescence of inventory		151,720			141,280			147,941
Loss on disposal of assets		1,261			2,354			3,040
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Receivables		(2,531,603	)		939,448			(1,074,228	)
Inventories		(1,397,147	)		69,431			(142,256	)
Prepaid expenses and other assets		161,753			(56,308	)		(69,216	)
Refundable income taxes		204,894			(182,481	)		(22,413	)
Other assets, primarily deposits		(2,000	)		(3,708	)		(11,892	)
Accounts payable		1,108,245			(27,528	)		374,468
Accrued expenses		591,293			(382,954	)		(142,531	)

Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(690,870	)		1,246,776			1,033,776

Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchase of property and equipment		(157,784	)		(630,365	)		(660,405	)
Advances to employees		(8,997	)		(4,671	)		(6,207	)
Collection of advances to employees		3,570			5,946			12,608

Net cash used in investing activities		(163,211	)		(629,090	)		(654,004	)

Cash flows from financing activities:
Borrowings on notes payable		16,248,866			14,347,800			16,608,056
Repayments on notes payable		(15,232,420	)		(14,809,050	)		(16,982,029	)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		1,016,446			(461,250	)		(373,973	)

Net increase in cash		162,365			156,436			5,799
Cash at beginning of year		176,078			19,642			13,843

Cash at end of year	$	338,443		$	176,078		$	19,642

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

F-6

ABATIX CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(1)	Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

	(a)	General

		Abatix Corp. (“Abatix”) and subsidiary (collectively, the “Company”) market and distribute personal protection and safety equipment and durable and nondurable supplies to the environmental industry, the industrial safety industry, the homeland security industry and, combined with tools and tool supplies, the construction industry. At December 31, 2004, the Company operated seven sales and distribution centers in five states. Abatix’s wholly-owned subsidiary, International Enviroguard Systems, Inc. (“IESI”) imports disposable protective clothing products sold through Abatix’s distribution channels and through other distributors.

		The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

		The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Abatix and IESI. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified for consistency in presentation.

	(b)	Inventories

		Inventories consist of materials and equipment for resale and are stated at the lower of cost or market. Cost is determined by the first-in, first-out method.

	(c)	Property and Equipment

		Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.

F-7

ABATIX CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

	(d)	Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and Long-Lived Assets to Be Disposed Of

		In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“Statement”) No. 144, the Company reviews long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to future net cash flows expected to be generated by the asset. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying value of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount or fair value less costs to sell.

	(e)	Revenue Recognition

		Revenue is recognized when the goods are shipped. Shipping fees billed to customers are included in net sales. The costs related to these shipping fees, which are included in selling, general and administrative expense, were $1,262,000, $1,160,000 and $1,254,000 for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

	(f)	Earnings per Share

		Basic earnings per share is calculated using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each year, while diluted earnings per share includes the effects of all dilutive potential common shares. As of December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002, there were no dilutive securities outstanding. Basic earnings per share and diluted earnings per share amounts were equal for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003, and 2002.

	(g)	Statements of Cash Flows

		For purposes of the Statements of Cash Flows, the Company considers all short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. The Company held no cash equivalents at December 31, 2004 or 2003.

		The Company paid interest of $233,259, $181,214 and $235,235 in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively, and income taxes of $32,139, $294,812 and $1,029,199 in 2004, 2003, and 2002, respectively.

F-8

ABATIX CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

	(h)	Income Taxes

		The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method. Under this method the Company records deferred income taxes for the temporary differences between the financial reporting basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities at enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when such amounts are realized or settled. The resulting deferred tax liabilities and assets are adjusted to reflect changes in tax laws or rates in the period that includes the enactment date.

	(i)	Goodwill

		Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price over the fair value of net assets acquired.

		In the first quarter of 2002, the Company adopted Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Statement No. 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” Statement No. 142 requires, among other things, the discontinuance of goodwill amortization. In addition, the Statement includes provisions for annual impairment testing of existing goodwill and other intangibles. Upon adoption of Statement No. 142, the Company ceased amortizing goodwill and performed an impairment review of its goodwill balance. Based on the review performed, the Company recorded an impairment charge for the full goodwill amount of $819,841, net of an income tax benefit of $327,900. The following pro forma disclosure presents earnings and earnings per share as if the goodwill requirements of Statement No. 142 had been adopted as of January 1, 2001.

	Year Ended December 31,

	2004		2003		2002

Reported net earnings	$	214,165	$	61,191	$	853,181
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax		—		—		491,941

Adjusted net earnings	$	214,165	$	61,191	$	1,345,122

Basic and diluted earnings per common share:
Reported net earnings	$	.13	$	.04	$	.50
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle, net of tax		—		—		.29

Adjusted net earnings	$	.13	$	.04	$	.79

F-9

ABATIX CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

	(j)	New Accounting Standards

		In November 2004, FASB issued Statement No. 151, “Inventory Costs – an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter 4.” Statement No. 151 requires that abnormal amounts of costs, including idle facility expense, freight, handling costs and spoilage, should be recognized as current period charges. The provisions of this Statement are effective for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not expect the adoption of this Statement to have a material impact on its financial statements.

		In December 2004, FASB issued Statement No. 153, “Exchanges of Nonmonetary Assets – an amendment of Accounting Principles Board (“APB”) Opinion No. 29.” Statement No. 153 amends APB Opinion No. 29 to eliminate the exception for nonmonetary exchanges of similar productive assets and replaces it with a general exception for exchanges of nonmonetary assets that do not have a commercial substance. A nonmonetary exchange has commercial substance if the future cash flows of the entity are expected to change significantly as a result of the exchange. The provisions of this Statement are effective for nonmonetary exchanges occurring in fiscal periods beginning after June 15, 2005. The Company does not expect the adoption of this Statement to have a material impact on its financial statements.

		In December 2004, FASB issued Statement No. 123R, “Share-Based Payment.” Statement No. 123R supersedes APB Opinion No. 25 and requires the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments be recognized over the period during which an employee is required to provide service in exchange for the award. The provisions of this Statement are effective for public entities that do not file as small business issuers as of the beginning of the first interim period or annual reporting period that begins after June 15, 2005. The Company does not expect the adoption of this Statement to have a material impact on its financial statements.

(2)	Property and Equipment

	Property and equipment consists of the following at December 31, 2004 and 2003:

	Estimated Useful Life		2004				2003

Furniture and equipment		3 - 8 years	$	2,689,517		$	2,694,718
Transportation equipment		3 - 5 years		433,811			468,628
Leasehold improvements		3 - 5 years		456,751			435,416

				3,580,079			3,598,762
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization				(2,592,385	)		(2,305,154	)

Net property and equipment			$	987,694		$	1,293,608

F-10

ABATIX CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(3)	Notes Payable

	At December 31, 2004, the Company had two lines of credit with a bank. The working capital facility allows the Company to borrow up to 80% of the book value of eligible trade receivables plus the lesser of 40% of eligible inventory or $2,000,000, up to a maximum of $8,000,000. Under this formula, the Company had the ability to borrow $8,000,000 at December 31, 2004, of which approximately $5,496,000 was used. A capital equipment facility provides for individual borrowings, aggregating up to $500,000, at 80% of the purchased equipment’s cost. At December 31, 2004, the Company had borrowed approximately $44,000 on this facility. Each borrowing under the capital equipment line is due on the earlier of demand or in terms ranging from thirty-six to sixty monthly installments of principal and interest. Both credit facilities are payable on demand and bear a variable rate of interest based on the prime rate. As of December 31, 2004 and 2003, the Company’s rate of interest on these agreements was 5.00% and 3.75%, respectively. These credit facilities are secured by accounts receivable, inventories and equipment.

	The Company has a note payable to Ford Motor Credit Corporation secured by one of the Company’s vehicles. The note is for 36 months, maturing in January 2005, and carries a 0% interest rate. At December 31, 2004, the balance owed was approximately $900.

(4)	Income Taxes

	Income tax expense (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 consists of:

	2004			2003			2002

Current:
Federal	$	215,012		$	68,324		$	703,221
State		52,219			29,630			138,757
Deferred:
Federal		(61,127	)		(4,722	)		(260,266	)
State		(10,787	)		(834	)		(45,929	)

Total income tax expense	$	195,317		$	92,398		$	535,783

F-11

ABATIX CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

A reconciliation of expected federal income tax expense (based on the U.S. corporate income tax rate of 34%) to actual income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 follows:

	2004		2003		2002

Expected income tax expense	$	139,224	$	52,220	$	472,248
State income taxes, net of related federal tax benefit		27,345		19,006		45,651
Nondeductible meals, entertainment expense		7,160		16,780		14,892
Other		21,588		4,392		2,992

Actual income tax expense	$	195,317	$	92,398	$	535,783

	The state income taxes in 2004 and 2003 are higher than expected because Texas is not a unitary state and excludes certain deductions in calculating the Texas franchise tax.

	The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 2004 and 2003 follow:

	2004			2003

Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for doubtful accounts	$	147,144		$	111,132
Inventory		303,159			269,199
Goodwill, due to differences in amortization periods		306,618			339,328
Property and equipment, principally due to differences in depreciation		57,725			11,420

Total gross deferred tax assets		814,646			731,079
Deferred tax liabilities – prepaid expenses		(140,462	)		(128,809	)

Net deferred tax assets	$	674,184		$	602,270

	Management has determined, based on the Company’s history of prior operating earnings and its expectations for the future, that operating earnings will more likely than not be sufficient to realize the benefit of the deferred tax assets. Accordingly, the Company has not provided a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets in any period presented.

(5)	Stockholders’ Equity

	The Board of Directors authorized the acquisition of up to 726,500 shares of the Company’s common stock. The Company has acquired 726,166 shares that are held as treasury shares.

F-12

ABATIX CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(6)	Benefit Plans

	The Company has a 401(k) profit sharing plan, under which eligible employees may request the Company deduct and contribute a portion of their compensation to the plan. The Company, at its discretion, matches a portion of employee contributions to the plan. Contributions by the Company to the 401(k) plan aggregated $77,823, $115,262 and $115,617 during 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

(7)	Fair Value of Financial Instruments

	The reported amounts of financial instruments such as cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximate fair value because of their short maturity. The carrying value of notes payable to bank approximates fair value because these instruments bear interest at current market rates. Although the note payable to Ford Motor Credit Corporation bears zero interest, the current balance of the note approximates fair value because of its short term.

(8)	Segment Information

	Identification of operating segments is based principally upon differences in the types and distribution channel of products. The Company’s reportable segments consist of Abatix and IESI. The Abatix operating segment includes seven aggregated branches, principally engaged in distributing environmental, safety, homeland security and construction equipment and supplies to contractors and industrial manufacturing facilities in the western half of the United States and the Company’s corporate operations. The IESI operating segment, which consists of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, International Enviroguard Systems, Inc., is engaged in the wholesale distribution of disposable protective clothing to companies similar to, and including, Abatix. The IESI operating segment distributes products throughout the United States.

	The accounting policies are consistent in each operating segment as described in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company evaluates the performance of its operating segments based on operating profit after a charge for the carrying value of inventory and accounts receivable. Intersegment sales are at agreed upon pricing and intersegment profits are eliminated in consolidation.

F-13

ABATIX CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Summarized financial information concerning the Company’s reportable segments is shown in the following table. There are no other significant noncash items.

	Abatix			IESI		Totals

2004
Sales from external customers	$	50,105,619		$	2,786,594	$	52,892,213
Intersegment sales		—			567,399		567,399
Interest expense		242,643			—		242,643
Depreciation and amortization		456,597			5,840		462,437
Segment profit		148,990			509,778		658,768
Segment assets		17,679,153			1,757,079		19,436,232
Capital expenditures		157,784			—		157,784
2003
Sales from external customers	$	46,932,862		$	1,960,558	$	48,893,420
Intersegment sales		—			565,157		565,157
Interest expense		178,857			—		178,857
Depreciation and amortization		424,915			1,403		426,318
Segment profit (loss)		(38,545	)		388,443		349,898
Segment assets		14,900,767			1,519,044		16,419,811
Capital expenditures		612,415			17,950		630,365
2002
Sales from external customers	$	57,773,848		$	2,027,327	$	59,801,175
Intersegment sales		—			429,930		429,930
Interest expense		230,605			—		230,605
Depreciation and amortization		466,109			3,016		469,125
Segment profit		2,046,304			378,760		2,425,064
Segment assets		16,662,281			548,037		17,210,318
Capital expenditures		658,335			2,070		660,405

F-14

ABATIX CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Below is a reconciliation of (i) total segment profit to operating profit on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, and (ii) total segment assets to total assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets for all periods presented. The sales from external customers represent the net sales on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

	2004			2003			2002

Profit for reportable segments	$	658,768		$	349,898		$	2,425,064
Elimination of intersegment profits		(8,406	)		(18,225	)		12,134

Operating profit	$	650,362		$	331,673		$	2,437,198

Total assets for reportable segments	$	19,436,232		$	16,419,811		$	17,210,318
Elimination of intersegment assets		(164,308	)		(78,036	)		(58,002	)

Total assets	$	19,271,924		$	16,341,775		$	17,152,316

	The Company’s sales, substantially all of which are on an unsecured credit basis, are to various customers from its distribution centers in Texas, California, Arizona, Washington and Nevada. The Company evaluates credit risks on an individual basis before extending credit to its customers and it believes the allowance for doubtful accounts adequately provides for loss on uncollectible accounts. During 2004, 2003 and 2002, no single customer accounted for more than 10% of net sales, although sales to environmental contractors were approximately 46%, 47% and 55% of consolidated net sales in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. A reduction in spending on environmental projects could significantly impact sales.

	Although no vendor accounted for more than 10% of purchases, two product classes accounted for greater than 10% of sales. One product class accounted for approximately 16%, 9% and 11% of net sales in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. A major component of these products is petroleum. Increases in oil prices or shortages in supply could significantly impact sales and the Company’s ability to supply its customers with certain products at a reasonable price. The second product class accounted for 12%, 13% and 12% of net sales in 2004, 2003 and 2002, respectively. This product class is comprised of many vendors, none of which control the market.

F-15

ABATIX CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(9)	Commitments and Contingencies

	The Company leases warehouse and office facilities and certain office equipment under long-term noncancelable operating leases expiring at various dates through July 2010. The following is a schedule of future minimum lease payments under these leases as of December 31, 2004:

2005	$	1,155,787
2006		674,508
2007		372,115
2008		139,412
2009		121,263
Thereafter		117,732

	$	2,580,817

	Rental expense under operating leases for the years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002 was $1,261,156, $1,181,499 and $1,199,089, respectively.

	The Company has employment agreements with three officers that were effective on January 1, 2005 and expire at the end of 2006. The agreements provide for minimum aggregate cash compensation of $583,500 in both 2005 and 2006.

	The Company has been named in several class action lawsuits as detailed below. These complaints generally allege that defendants violated the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 by allegedly making a series of materially false and purportedly misleading statements concerning Abatix’s business agreement with the Goodwin Group LLC and, as a result, the price of the Abatix stock was allegedly artificially inflated causing plaintiff and other members of the class to allegedly suffer damages. The Company intends to vigorously defend itself against these allegations.

	• On April 26, 2004, the Company and certain of its officers and directors were named as defendants in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas styled Family Medicine Specialists and Howard Kalnitsky, and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiffs v. Abatix Corp., Terry Shaver, Frank Cinatl, IV and Gary Cox, Defendants (304CV-872 D).

	• On April 30, 2004, the Company and certain of its officers and directors were named as defendants in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas styled David Maione, Individually And On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff vs. Abatix Corp and Terry Shaver, Defendants (304 CV0926-P).

	• On May 5, 2004, the Company and certain of its officers and directors were named as defendants in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas styled Eve Gelman, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. Abatix Corporation, Terry Shaver and Frank Cinatl (4-04CV-341-A).

F-16

ABATIX CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

	• On May 11, 2004, the Company and certain of its officers and directors were named as defendants in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas styled Vincent Teal, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff v. Abatix Corp., Terry Shaver, Frank Cinatl, IV and Gary Cox, Defendants (3-04CV-1002P).

	• On May 21, 2004, the Company and an officer and director were named as defendants in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas styled John S. Rankin, On Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. Abatix Corp., and Terry Shaver Defendants (504CV 116).

	All of these lawsuits have been transferred to one Federal District Court in the Northern District of Texas, Dallas Division and have been consolidated into a single case under Cause No. 3-04CV-872-D; Family Medicine Specialists, et al v. Abatix, et al.

	On May 27, 2004, the officers and directors of Abatix Corp. were named as defendants in a lawsuit filed in the District Court of Dallas County, Texas, 162nd Judicial District styled Daniel M. Johnson Plaintiff v. Terry Shaver; Frank Cinatl IV; Gary L Cox; Donald N. Black; Eric A. Young; and A. David Cook; Defendants v. Abatix Corp. Nominal Defendant (Cause No. 2004-04-4841), although Plaintiff has dismissed A. David Cook from this case since Mr. Cook was not a director of the Company at the time of the alleged actions. This suit is a shareholder derivative action that alleges that all of the defendants breached certain fiduciary duties and abused their control of Abatix. In that regard, the plaintiff seeks contribution and indemnification. In addition, this petition alleges that Donald Black, an outside board of director of Abatix, breached his fiduciary duties by selling securities based on allegedly material, non-public information and by allegedly misappropriation of information. Plaintiff has agreed to abate this case; however, Plaintiff has the right to lift the abatement and pursue these claims with 15 days notice.

	Other than the applicable policy deductible and the fees and expenses incurred prior to provision of notice to the insurance carrier, the insurance company has paid for the defense costs related to the Securities and Exchange Commission inquiry and the class action and derivative lawsuits. At this time, it is not possible to predict whether the Company will have any additional liability or to estimate additional costs that may be incurred with such actions that may not be covered by any applicable insurance policy.

F-17

ABATIX CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(10)	Selected Quarterly Data (unaudited)

	Quarter

	First			Second			Third ^a		Fourth ^a			Total

2004
Net sales	$	11,972,318		$	12,464,008		$	14,408,758	$	14,047,129		$	52,892,213
Gross profit		3,210,102			3,345,435			3,955,350		3,859,418			14,370,305
Operating (loss) profit		(97,334	)		(277,821	)		516,518		508,999			650,362
Net (loss) earnings		(120,054	)		(202,737	)		282,612		254,344			214,165
Basic and diluted (loss) earnings per common share		(.07	)		(.12	)		.17		.15			.13
2003 ^b
Net sales	$	12,850,036		$	12,774,139		$	12,359,999	$	10,909,246		$	48,893,420
Gross profit		3,783,352			3,731,354			3,546,137		2,989,355			14,050,198
Operating profit (loss)		254,788			90,226			162,039		(175,380	)		331,673
Net earnings (loss)		115,977			23,454			75,029		(153,269	)		61,191
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per common share		.07			.01			. 05		(.09	)		.04

^aThe growth in revenues and profitability in the third and fourth quarters of 2004 is primarily a result of the clean up following the three hurricanes in Florida.

^bThe generally declining amounts from quarter to quarter in 2003 resulted from the decline in mold business during the first half of 2003. This decline in mold business was not offset by a corresponding decline in costs as much of our cost structure is fixed.

F-18

Schedule II

ABATIX CORP. AND SUBSIDIARY

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts
Years ended December 31, 2004, 2003 and 2002

	Balance at beginning of year		Additions charged to costs and expenses		Other		Deductions			Balance at end of year

Year ended December 31:
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts:
2004	$	277,830		416,026		—		325,782	A	$	368,074

2003	$	390,910		265,289		—		378,369	A	$	277,830

2002	$	447,037		134,911		—		191,038	A	$	390,910

Inventory Reserve:
2004	$	454,699		151,720		—		129,995	B	$	476,424

2003	$	398,528		141,280		—		85,109	B	$	454,699

2002	$	391,925		147,941		—		141,338	B	$	398,528


A	Represents the write-off of uncollectible accounts.
B	Represents the disposal of obsolete inventory.

S-1

Filing Compare · ABATIX CORP