UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[ X ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2014

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.

For the transition period from to

000-53696

(Commission File No.)

BIOLOG, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)`

Utah

87-0279370

(State or other jurisdiction of

Incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Indemnification No.)

123 Parker Avenue, Liverpool, NY 13088

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (315) 560-5505

Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. (X) Yes ( ) No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). (X) Yes ( ) No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer			( )			Accelerated filer		( )
Non-accelerated filer			( )			Smaller reporting company		(X)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act)

(X )Yes ( ) No

The number of shares of common stock, $.001 par value per share, of the registrant that is outstanding as of the latest practicable date July 30, 2014, is 40,436,740 shares.

BIOLOG, INC.
JUNE 30, 2014

	PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION	Page
Item 1.	Financial Statements
	(Unaudited) Balance Sheets As of June 30, 2014 As of December 31, 2013	3
	(Unaudited) Statements of Operations For the three months ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013 For the six months ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013	4
	(Unaudited) Statements of Cash Flows For the six months ended June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013	5
	(Unaudited) Notes to Financial Statements	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation	9
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	20
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	20

	PART II – OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	23
Item1A.	Risk Factors	23
Item 2.	Unregistered Sale of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	29
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	29
Item 4.	Mining Safety Disclosure	29
Item 5.	Other Information	29
Item 6.	Exhibits	30

	SIGNATURES	31

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

BIOLOG, INC.
BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)

		June 30,			December 31,
		2014			2013
ASSETS
Current Assets:
Cash	$	164		$	109
Accounts receivable		677			447
Total Current Assets		841			556

Property and equipment:
Payphone equipment		5,000			5,000
Less accumulated depreciation		(3,833	)		(3,333	)
Net property and equipment		1,167			1,667

TOTAL ASSETS	$	2,008		$	2,223

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' DEFICIT
Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expense	$	73,454		$	74,193
Accounts payable to related parties		21,300			19,700
Convertible notes to related parties		70,000			59,250
Interest payable to related parties		15,574			13,105
Total Current Liabilities		180,328			166,248

Stockholders' Deficit:
Preferred stock, par value $.001, 10,000,000 shares authorized,
none issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013					—
Common stock, par value $.001, 100,000,000 shares authorized,
40,436,740 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and
40,436,710 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013		40,440			40,440
Additional paid-in capital		(2,123	)		(2,123	)
Accumulated deficit		(216,637	)		(202,342	)
Total Stockholder's Deficit		(178,320	)		(164,025	)

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S DEFICIT	$	2,008		$	2,223

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements.

BIOLOG, INC.
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
	June 30,						June 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Revenues:
Income	$	1,840		$	1,985		$	3,697		$	3,849
Cost of services		(1,988	)		(2,257	)		(4,110	)		(4,518	)
Gross loss		(148	)		(272	)		(413	)		(669	)

Operating Expenses:
Accounting and bookkeeping		2,300			2,300			5,100			8,600
Other general and administrative expenses		2,116			1,360			6,313			5,780
Total Operating Expenses		4,416			3,660			11,413			14,380

Operating Loss		(4,564	)		(3,932	)		(11,826	)		(15,049	)

Other Expense:
Interest expense		(1,290	)		(1,183	)		(2,469	)		(2,351	)

Net Loss	$	(5,854	)	$	(5,115	)	$	(14,295	)	$	(17,400	)

Basic and diluted net loss per common share	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)	$	(0.00	)

Basic and Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding		40,436,740			40,436,710			40,436,725			40,436,710

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited financial statements.

BIOLOG, INC.
STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
	Six Months Ended
	June 30,
	2014			2013
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(14,295	)	$	(17,400	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash
used in operating activities:
Depreciation		500			500
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Accounts receivable		(230	)		274
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		(739	)		11,106
Accounts payable to related party		1,600			3,100
Interest payable to related parties		2,469			2,350
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities		(10,695	)		(70	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from convertible notes to related parties		10,750			—
Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		10,750			—

Net increase (decrease) in cash		55			(70	)
Cash at beginning of period		109			150
Cash at end of period	$	164		$	80

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	—		$	—
Income taxes		—			—
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these audited financial statements.

BIOLOG, INC.
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1 –BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited interim financial statements of Biolog, Inc. (“we”, “our”, “Biolog” or the “Company”) have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and should be read in conjunction with Biolog’s audited 2013 annual financial statements and notes thereto filed on Form 10-K with the SEC. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal reoccurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of financial position and the results of operations for the interim periods present have been reflected herein. The results of operation for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year. Notes to the financial statements, which would substantially duplicate the disclosure required in Biolog’s fiscal 2013 financial statements have been omitted.

NOTE 2 – GOING CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on the basis of accounting principles applicable to a “going concern”, which assume that Biolog will continue in operation for at least one year and will be able to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of operations.

Several conditions and events cast substantial doubt about Biolog’s ability to continue as a going concern. Biolog has a working capital deficit of $179,487 as of June 30, 2014, has incurred net losses of $216,637 for the period from February 18, 1927 (inception) to June 30, 2014, has had limited revenues and requires additional financing in order to finance its business activities on an ongoing basis. Biolog’s future capital requirements will depend on numerous factors including, but not limited to, continued progress in finding a merger candidate and the pursuit of business opportunities. Biolog is actively pursuing alternative financing and has had discussions with various third parties, although no firm commitments have been obtained. In the interim, shareholders of Biolog have committed to meeting its minimal operating expenses.

Management believes that actions presently being taken to revise Biolog’s operating and financial requirements provide them with the opportunity to continue as a going concern.

These financial statements do not reflect adjustments that would be necessary if Biolog were unable to continue as a going concern. While management believes that the actions already taken or planned, will mitigate the adverse conditions and events which raise doubt about the validity of the “going concern” assumption used in preparing these financial statements, there can be no assurance that these actions will be successful. If Biolog were unable to continue as a “going concern,” then substantial adjustments would be necessary to the carrying values of assets, the reported amounts of its liabilities, the reported revenues and expenses, and the balance sheet classifications used.

NOTE 3 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

In 2009 through 2014, Biolog received loans from Joseph Passalaqua and in 2011 through 2014, Biolog received loans from Mary Passalaqua and Cobalt Blue LLC of which Mary Passalaqua is President and these amounts were classified as a Convertible Notes Payable. The notes are convertible into common stock of the Company at $0.001 per share. The notes are unsecured, due on demand and bear interest at 8% per annum. As of June 30, 2014, Biolog owes $70,000 on principal of all Convertible Notes held to related parties, with interest accrued of $15,574.

As of June 30, 2014, Biolog has incurred a liability to Lyboldt-Daly in the amount of $21,300. Lyboldt-Daly completed the bookkeeping and internal accounting for Biolog, Inc. Joseph Passalaqua is President of Lyboldt-Daly and a majority shareholder in Biolog, Inc. The liability is unsecured and due on demand.

As of June 30, 2014, all activities of Biolog have been conducted by corporate officers from either their homes or business offices. Currently, there are no outstanding debts owed by Biolog for the use of these facilities and there are no commitments for future use of the facilities.

NOTE 4 - CONVERTIBLE NOTES PAYABLE

In 2009 through 2014, Biolog incurred liabilities to Joseph Passalaqua in the amount of $26,163 ($5,750 was borrowed during the six months ended June 30, 2014). These amounts are classified as a Convertible Notes Payable. The notes are unsecured, due on demand and bear simple interest at 8% per annum. As of June 30, 2014, Biolog owes Joseph Passalaqua $26,163 in principal these notes, with interest accrued of $7,308.

In 2011 through 2012, Biolog incurred liabilities to Mary Passalaqua in the amount of $12,800. These amounts are classified as a Convertible Notes Payable. The notes are unsecured, due on demand and bear simple interest at 8% per annum. As of June 30, 2014, Biolog owes Mary Passalaqua $12,800 in principal these notes, with interest accrued of $2,940.

In 2011 through 2014, Biolog incurred liabilities to Cobalt Blue LCC, of which Mary Passalaqua is the President, in the amount of $31,037 ($5,000 was borrowed during the three months ended June 30, 2014). These amounts are classified as a Convertible Notes Payable. The notes are unsecured, due on demand and bear simple interest at 8% per annum, As of June 30, 2014, Biolog owes Cobalt Blue LLC $31,037 in principal these notes, with interest accrued of $5,326.

The above notes are convertible into common stock of Biolog at a rate of $0.001. Biolog evaluated the convertible portion of the above debt at issuances under ASC 815-20 and ASC 815-40 for consideration of classification as a liability and derivative and determined both were not applicable. Biolog then evaluated the convertible portion under ASC 470-20-05 and ASC 470-20-30 for consideration of beneficial conversion feature and determined none existed.

NOTE 5 – COMMON STOCK

As of December 31, 2013, Biolog had 100,000,000 shares of common stock authorized at $0.001 par value per share and 40,436,710 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

On April 1, 2014, the Company issued 30 shares of common stock to Cede & Co. to adjust the number of shares issued and outstanding to a corrected amount. The adjustment was due to an error in the rounding of fractional shares during the 2010 forward split.

As of June 30, 2014, Biolog had 100,000,000 shares of common stock authorized at $0.001 par value per share and 40,436,740 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

NOTE 6 – PREFERRED STOCK

As of December 31, 2013 and June 30, 2014, Biolog had 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized at $0.001 and no shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

Forward Looking Statements

This Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements (rather than historical facts) that involve risks and uncertainties. You can identify these statements by the use of forward-looking words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “continue” or other similar words. Such forward-looking statements discuss our current expectations of future results of operations or financial condition. However, there may be events in the future that we are unable to accurately predict or control and there may be risks, uncertainties and events that may cause our actual results to differ materially from the expectations we describe in our forward-looking statements, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition. The forward-looking statements included herein are only made as of the date of the filing of this Form 10-Q, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.

BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The unaudited financial statements of Biolog Inc., a Utah corporation (“Biolog,” the “Company,” “our” or “we”), should be read in conjunction with the notes thereto. In the opinion of management, the unaudited financial statements presented herein reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for fair presentation. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the entire year.

We prepare our financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, which require that management make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Corporate History

We were incorporated under the name “National Treasure Mines Company” on February 18, 1927 under the laws of the State of Utah. Our original purpose was to engage in, carry on and conduct a general mining business in the State of Utah.

On October 31, 1986, we approved the merger and reorganization between our Company and Roskamp Manley Associates Inc., a California corporation (“RMA”), resulting in RMA becoming our wholly owned subsidiary. RMA remained our wholly owned subsidiary until when it was unable to remain in good standing and did not reinstate its business charter in California, resulting in the dissolution of RMA.

On December 18, 1986, we filed an Amended Articles of Incorporation and changed the name of the Company to “N.T.M. Inc.”

On June 29, 1994, we completed the acquisition of Larson # 11-28 and Zadow # 23-34, two wells in Radcliff and Mission Canyon in the State of Montana. After discovering after the acquisition that these wells were non-performing, we disposed of such assets. Because we were unable to achieve our intended purpose, we ceased operations and became dormant in 1995, at which time we did not have any assets or liabilities.

We remained in this condition until we filed an Application for Reinstatement with the Utah Secretary of State on November 4, 2004. On December 15, 2004, we filed an Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, under which we changed our name to “Biolog, Inc.” Since 2004, we have not commenced any operations.

On January 22, 2009, we filed an Application of Reinstatement with the Utah Secretary of State.

On February 17, 2009, we adopted an Amendment to the Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation that vacated all of the previous Articles of Incorporation in their entirety, effective retroactively, and filed such Amendment on April 20, 2009 with the Utah Secretary of State.

On February 17, 2009, our stockholders approved a 1 for 100 reverse stock split (the “Reverse Split”) of our common stock, and the filing of an amendment to our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to reflect the Reverse Split. The effective date of the Reverse Split was April 20, 2009. Upon effectiveness of the Reverse Split, each stockholder received one share of common stock for every 100 shares of common stock owned and outstanding as of the record date. The Reverse Split did not affect the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance.

On September 1, 2010, the Company acquired payphone equipment from Amanda Godin, the President of Biolog Inc., in exchange for 3,000,000 shares of common stock and has commenced business operations by providing the use of outdoor payphones, and providing telecommunication services.

On November 2, 2010, the Company had a resolution and amended the Articles of Incorporation to include a 10/1 forward stock split, with all fractional shares being dropped. The record date of the forward split was November 2, 2010, with the effect being retroactive back to inception. The Forward Split did not affect the number of shares of common stock authorized for issuance.

BUISNESS PLAN

Our current principal business activity is to seek a suitable candidate to consummate an acquisition, merger or other suitable business combination method. More specifically, we are seeking the consummation of a merger, acquisition or other business combination transaction with a privately owned entity seeking to become a publicly owned entity. As a “reporting company,” we may be more attractive to a private target because our common stock is eligible to be quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board. However, there is no assurance that we will be quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board.

It is the intent of management and our significant stockholder, Joseph Passalaqua to provide sufficient working capital necessary to support and preserve the integrity of the corporate entity.

However, there is no legal obligation for either management or our significant stockholder, Joseph Passalaqua to provide additional future funding. Should this pledge fail to provide financing and we have not identified any alternative sources of funding. There will be substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

Our need for capital may change dramatically because of any business acquisition or combination transaction. There can be no assurance that we will identify any such business, product, technology or company suitable for acquisition in the future. Further, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in consummating any acquisition on favorable terms or that we will be able to profitably manage the business, product, technology or company we acquire.

As a "reporting company," we may be more attractive to a private acquisition target because our common stock is eligible to be quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board although there is no assurance it will be quoted. As a result of filing this registration statement, we will be obligated to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission") certain periodic reports, including an annual report containing audited financial statements. We anticipate that we will continue to file such reports as required under the Exchange Act.

On June 10, 2009, we filed a Registration Statement on Form 10SB , or the “Registration Statement”, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, to register our common stock under Section 12(g) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act. The Registration Statement went effective in 60 days by operation of law on August 10, 2009, or the Effective Date. Since the Effective Date of the Registration Statement, we have become a reporting company under the Securities Exchange Act and are responsible for preparing and filing periodic and current reports under the Exchange Act with the SEC.

Any person or entity may read and copy our reports with the Securities and Exchange Commission at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Room by calling the SEC toll free at 1-800-SEC-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet site at http://www.sec.gov where reports, proxies and informational statements on public companies may be viewed by the public.

SERVICES AND PRODUCTS

We own, operate and manage privately owned public payphones in the County of Delaware, State of New York. As of December 31, December 31, 2013, we own, operate, and manage 25 payphones. The Company does not have any long-term agreements with the customers of these payphones and they may terminate their contract at will. We may pay site owners a commission based on a flat monthly rate or on a percentage of sales. Some of the businesses include, but are not limited to, retail stores, convenience stores, bars, restaurants, gas stations, colleges and hospitals. In the alternative, our agreement with business owners may be to provide the telecommunications services without the payment of any commissions.

The local telephone switch controls the traditional payphone technology. The local switch does not provide any services in the payphone that can benefit the owner of the phone. When we purchase phones from other companies, they come with "smart card" payphone technology. These phones have a circuit board with improved technology. The “smart card” technology allows us to determine the operational status of the payphone. It also tells us when the coins in the phone have to be collected, the number and types of calls that have been made from each phone, as well as other helpful information that helps us provide better service to our payphone using public. This upgrade of the phones reduces the number and frequency of service visits due to outages and other payphone-related problems and, in turn, reduces the maintenance costs. Other companies manufacture the components of the payphones for the industry, including Universal Communications and TCI, which provides handsets, key pads, totalizers, and relays.

Payphone users can circumvent the usual payment method and avoid inserting a coin by using an access code or 800 number provided by a long distance carrier. These “dial-around” numbers, while convenient for users, leave payphone service providers uncompensated for the call made. The Federal Communications Commission, or the FCC, as instructed by Congress in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, created regulations to ensure that payphone service providers receive compensation for these “dial-around” calls.

Our installed payphone base generates revenue from two principal sources: coin-calls and non-coin calls.

Coin calls:

Coin calls represent calls paid for by customers who deposit coins into the payphones. Coin call revenue is recorded as the actual amount of coins collected from the payphones.

Non-Coin calls:

Non-coin revenue includes commissions from operator service telecommunications companies and a “dial-around” commission of $0.494 per call that the FCC requires sellers of long distance toll free services to pay payphone owners. The commissions for operator services are paid 45 days in arrears. These funds are remitted quarterly through a service provided by the American Public Communication Council (APCC).

Seasonality

Our revenues from payphone operation are affected by seasonal variations, geographic distribution of payphones and type of location. Because we operate in the northeastern part of the country with many of the payphones located outdoor, weather patterns affect our revenue streams. Revenues drop off significantly during winter and conversely show an increase in the spring and summer. Revenues are generally lowest in the first quarter and highest in the third quarter.

Significant Customers

We do not rely on a major customer for our revenue. We have a variety of small single businesses as well as some small chain stores that we service. We do not believe that we would suffer dramatically if any one customer or small chain decided to stop using our phones.

Significant Vendors

We must buy dial tone for each payphone from the local exchange carrier. As long as we pay the carrier bill, it is required to provide a dial tone. As a regulated utility, the exchange carrier may not refuse to provide us service. Alternate service exists in certain areas where Verizon competitors are located. We use alternate local service providers when we can get a better price for the service. We use long distance providers on all the payphones.

Intellectual Property

The phones that we purchase from other companies contain "smart card" payphone technology that was developed by Quortec, the founder and manufacturer of the “smart cards. The “smart card” includes a circuit board with improved technology that allows us to determine on a preset time basis the operational status of the payphone. The technology informs us when the coins in the phone have to be collected, the number and types of calls that have been made from each phone, as well as other helpful information that helps us provide better service to our payphone using public. This upgrade of the phones reduces the number and frequency of service visits due to outages and other payphone-related problems and, in turn, reduces the maintenance costs. Other companies manufacture the components of the payphones for the industry including Universal Communications and TCI, which provides handsets, key pads, totalizers, and relays.

We do not own any patents or trademarks. Companies in the telecommunications industry and other industries in which we compete own large numbers of patents, copyrights and trademarks and frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. As we face increasing competition, the possibility of intellectual property claims against us grows. We might not be able to withstand any third-party claims or rights against their use.

Government Regulation:

We are subject to varying degrees of regulation by federal, state, local and foreign regulators. The implementation, modification, interpretation and enforcement of these laws and regulations vary and can limit our ability to provide many of our services. Our ability to compete in our target markets depends, in part, upon favorable regulatory conditions and the favorable interpretations of existing laws and regulations.

FCC Regulation and Interstate Rates:

Our services are subject to the jurisdiction of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) with respect to interstate telecommunications services and other matters for which the FCC has jurisdiction under the Communications Act of 1934, as amended.

Payphone users can circumvent the usual payment method and avoid inserting a coin by using an access code or 800 number provided by a long distance carrier. These “dial-around” numbers, while convenient for users, leave payphone service providers uncompensated for the call made. The Federal Communications Commission, as instructed by Congress in the Telecommunications Act of 1996, created regulations to ensure that payphone service providers receive compensation for these “dial-around” calls.

The FCC requires the sellers of long distance toll free services to pay the payphone owner $0.494 cents per call. These funds are remitted quarterly through a service provided by the American Public Communication Council (APCC). If the FCC regulation requiring sellers of long distance toll free services to pay payphone owners $0.494 per call is reduced or repealed, it could have a negative effect upon our revenue stream. We have no control over what rules and regulations the state and federal regulatory agencies require us to follow now or in the future. It is possible for future regulations to be so financially demanding that they cause us to go out of business. We are not aware of any proposed regulations or changes to any existing regulations.

Telecommunications Act of 1996

The Telecommunications Act of 1996, regulatory and judicial actions and the development of new technologies, products and services have created opportunities for alternative telecommunication service providers, many of which are subject to fewer regulatory constraints. We are unable to predict definitively the impact that the ongoing changes in the telecommunications industry will ultimately have on our business, results of operations or financial condition. The financial impact will depend on several factors, including the timing, extent and success of competition in our markets, the timing and outcome of various regulatory proceedings and any appeals, and the timing, extent and success of our pursuit of new opportunities resulting from the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and technological advances.

Research and Development

We have not expended any money in the last two fiscal years on research and development activities.

Employees

The company does not have any employees. Joseph Passalaqua is our President and Chief Executive Officer and Garry McHenry is our Secretary and Chief Financial Officer, neither of whom have employment agreements.

Any person or entity may read and copy our reports with the Commission at the Commission’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Room by calling the Commission toll free at 1-800-SEC-0330. The Commission also maintains an Internet site at http://www.sec.gov where reports, proxies and other disclosure statements on public companies may be viewed by the public.

GOING CONCERN QUALIFICATION

Several conditions and events cast substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The Company has incurred net losses of approximately $216,637 for the period from February 18, 1927 (inception) to June 30, 2014, has limited revenues and requires additional financing in order to finance its business activities on an ongoing basis. The Company’s future capital requirements will depend on numerous factors including, but not limited to, continued progress in finding a merger candidate and the pursuit of business opportunities. The Company is actively pursuing alternative financing and has had discussions with various third parties, although no firm commitments have been obtained. In the interim, shareholders of the Company have committed to meeting its minimal operating expenses. Management believes that actions presently being taken to revise the Company’s operating and financial requirements provide them with the opportunity to continue as a going concern. At December 31, 2013, we had $109 cash on hand, $447 in accounts receivable and an accumulated deficit of $202,342. At June 30, 2014, we had $164 cash on hand, $677 in accounts receivable and an accumulated deficit of $216,637. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES & ESTIMATES

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make judgments, assumptions and estimates that affect the amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. We base our estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. However, future events are subject to change, and the best estimates and judgments routinely require adjustment. The amounts of assets and liabilities reported in our balance sheet, and the amounts of revenues and expenses reported for each of our fiscal periods, are affected by estimates and assumptions which are used for, but not limited to, the accounting for allowance for doubtful accounts, goodwill and intangible asset impairments, restructurings, inventory and income taxes. Actual results could differ from these estimates. The following critical accounting policies are significantly affected by judgments, assumptions and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.

Revenue Recognition Policies

The Company recognizes revenues in accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) number 104, "Revenue Recognition." SAB 104 clarifies application of U. S. generally accepted accounting principles to revenue transactions. As of the year ended December 31, 2013, there was no deferred revenue. The Company derives its primary revenue from the sources described below, which includes dial-around revenues, operator service revenue, coin collections, telephone equipment repairs, and sales. Other revenue generated by the company includes sales commissions.

The Dial Around revenue is recognized when the billing and collection agent of the Company, APCC, calculates and compensates the Company for the use of the payphone on a quarterly basis by billing the actual party’s long distance carrier that received the calls. The date of the Dial Around revenue recognition is determined when this compensation is collected and deposited into the Company’s bank account.

The Operator Service revenue is recognized when the collection agents of the Company, Legacy Long Distance and US Intercom calculates and compensates the Company for the use of operator services on a monthly basis. The date of the Operator Service revenue recognition is determined when this compensation is collected and deposited into the Company’s bank account.

Coin revenues are recorded in an equal amount to the coins collected.

Revenues on commissions, telephone equipment and sales are realized when the services are provided and payment for such services is deemed certain.

Off- Balance Sheet Arrangements

We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

For purposes of the statement of cash flows, the Company considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with a maturity of 90 days or less to be cash equivalents to the extent the funds are not being held for investment purposes.

COSTS RELATED TO OUR OPERATION

The principal costs related to the ongoing operation of our payphones include telecommunication costs, commissions and depreciation. Telecommunication expenses consist of payments made by us to local exchange carriers and long distance carriers for access to and use of their telecommunications networks and service and maintenance costs. Commission expense represents payments to owners or operators of the premises at which a payphone is located.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

It is the belief of management that sufficient working capital necessary to support and preserve the integrity of the corporate entity will be present. However, there is no legal obligation for either management or significant stockholders to provide additional future funding. Should this pledge fail to provide financing, we have not identified any alternative sources. Consequently, there is substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

We have no current plans, proposals, arrangements or understandings with respect to the sale or issuance of additional securities prior to the location of a merger or acquisition candidate. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that sufficient funds will be available to us to allow us to cover the expenses related to such activities.

Regardless of whether our cash assets prove to be inadequate to meet our operational needs, we might seek to compensate providers of services by issuances of stock in lieu of cash.

At December 31, 2013, we had $109 cash on hand, $447 in accounts receivable and an accumulated deficit of $202,342. At June 30, 2014, we had $164 cash on hand, $677 in accounts receivable and an accumulated deficit of $216,637. Our primary source of liquidity for the current quarter has been from loans from related parties. This includes Joseph C. Passalaqua, the President and principal stockholder, Mary Passalaqua spouse of Joseph Passalaqua, and Cobalt Blue LLC of which Mary Passalaqua is President. As of June 30, 2014 we have convertible notes payable to Joseph C. Passalaqua, Mary Passalaqua, and Cobalt Blue LLC in the amount of $70,000. These notes bear a simple interest rate of 8% per annum and are payable upon demand. As of June 30, 2014 the accrued interest on these notes is $15,574.

Net cash used in operating activities was $10,695 during the six months ended June 30, 2014.

Net cash provided by investing activities was $0 during the six months ended June 30, 2014.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $10,750 during the six months ended June 30, 2014.

To date, we have had minimal revenues; and we require additional financing in order to finance our business activities on an ongoing basis. Our future capital requirements will depend on numerous factors including, but not limited to, continued progress in finding a merger candidate and the pursuit of business opportunities. We are actively pursuing alternative financing and have had discussions with various third parties, although no firm commitments have been obtained to date. In the interim, shareholders of the Company have committed to meet our minimal operating expenses. We believe that actions presently being taken to revise our operating and financial requirements provide them with the opportunity to continue as a “going concern,” although no assurances can be given.

NET LOSS FROM OPERATIONS

The Company had a net loss of $216,637 for the period from February 18, 1927 (inception) through June 30, 2014. The company had net loss of $14,295 for the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to a net loss of $17,400 for the six months ended June 30, 2013.

CASH FLOW

Our primary source of liquidity has been cash from shareholder loans.

WORKING CAPITAL

As of December 31, 2013 the Company had total current assets of $556 and total current liabilities of $166,248, which resulted in a working capital deficit of $165,692. As of June 30, 2014, the Company had total current assets of $841 and total current liabilities of $180,328 resulting in a working capital deficit of $179,487.

FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 COMPARED TO THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

REVENUES

Our total revenue decreased by $145, from $1,985 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 to $1,840 for the three months ended June 30, 2014.

Our coin call revenue was $129 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and $0 for the three months ended June 30, 2014.

Our non-coin call revenue, or commission income, which is comprised primarily of “dial around” revenue, star 88 commission revenue and operator service revenue, was $70 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and $55 for the three months ended June 30, 2014. The FCC requires the sellers of long distance toll free services to pay the payphone owner $0.494 cents per “dial-around” call. These funds are remitted quarterly through a service provided by the American Public Communication Council (APCC).

Our local service revenue which is comprised primarily of service for payphone customers was $1,786 for the three months ended June 30, 2013 and $1,785 for the three months ended June 30, 2014. This is the revenue from monthly invoices billed to payphone customers in which the Company owns the payphone and provides service to operate the payphone on the premises. As of June 30, 2014 seven customers made up the local service revenue:

Addison Place Apartments, Addison, New York

Delaware County Building & Maint. Department, Delaware, New York

Delhi Central School District, Delhi, New York

Morningstar Foods, Delhi, New York

Mountainside Residential Care, Lake Katrine, New York

SUNY Delhi, Delhi, New York

Town of Meredith, Meredale, New York

COST OF SALES

Our overall cost of services decreased by $269, from $2,257 in the three months ended June 30, 2013, to $1,988 in the three months ended June 30, 2014. The principal costs related to the ongoing operation of our payphones will include telecommunication costs, commission expense and depreciation.

Telecommunication costs consist of payments made by us to local exchange carriers and long distance carriers for access to and use of their telecommunications networks and service and maintenance costs.

Commission expense represents payments to owners or operators of the premises at which a payphone is located and APCC commission fees related to “dial-around” processing.

Depreciation expense is the quarterly depreciation of the payphone equipment, which is valued at $5,000. The company uses the straight line method, with a useful life of 5 years with $0 salvage value. The payphone equipment was acquired by the company on September 1, 2010.

Telecommunication costs were $1,956 in the three months ended June 30, 2013 and $1,709 in the three months ended June 30, 2014. Commission costs were $51 in the three months ended June 30, 2013 and $29 in the three months ended June 30, 2014. Depreciation expense was $250 in the three months ended June 30, 2013 and in the three months ended June 30, 2014.

OPERATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

Operating expenses increased by $863, from $4,843 in the three months ended June 30, 2013 to $5,706 in the three months ended June 30, 2014. Operating expenses primarily consist of general and administrative expenses (G&A) and professional fees. G&A expenses, made up primarily of office expenses and outside services consisting of stock transfer fees and filing fees, increased by $756, from $1,360 in the three months ended June 30, 2013 to $2,116 in the three months ended June 30, 2014. Professional fees, made up of accounting, bookkeeping, and legal fees are $2,300, the same for the period three month ended June 30, 2013 and 2014.. These are fees we pay to accountants and attorneys throughout the year for performing various tasks. Our expenses to date are largely due to professional fees that include accounting, consulting and legal fees.

FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2014 COMPARED TO THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2013

REVENUES

Our total revenue decreased by $152, from $3,849 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 to $3,697 for the six months ended June 30, 2014.

Our coin call revenue was $129 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2014.

Our non-coin call revenue, or commission income, which is comprised primarily of “dial around” revenue, star 88 commission revenue and operator service revenue, was $149 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and $127 for the six months ended June 30, 2014. The FCC requires the sellers of long distance toll free services to pay the payphone owner $0.494 cents per “dial-around” call. These funds are remitted quarterly through a service provided by the American Public Communication Council (APCC).

Our local service revenue which is comprised primarily of service for payphone customers was $3,571 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 and $3,570 for the six months ended June 30, 2014. This is the revenue from monthly invoices billed to payphone customers in which the Company owns the payphone and provides service to operate the payphone on the premises. As of June 30, 2014 seven customers made up the local service revenue:

Addison Place Apartments, Addison, New York

Delaware County Building & Maint. Department, Delaware, New York

Delhi Central School District, Delhi, New York

Morningstar Foods, Delhi, New York

Mountainside Residential Care, Lake Katrine, New York

SUNY Delhi, Delhi, New York

Town of Meredith, Meredale, New York

COST OF SALES

Our overall cost of services decreased by $408, from $4,518 in the six months ended June 30, 2013, to $4,110 in the six months ended June 30, 2014. The principal costs related to the ongoing operation of our payphones will include telecommunication costs, commission expense and depreciation.

Commission expense represents payments to owners or operators of the premises at which a payphone is located and APCC commission fees related to “dial-around” processing.

Telecommunication costs were $3,916 in the six months ended June 30, 2013 and $3,550 in the six months ended June 30, 2014. Commission costs were $102 in the six months ended June 30, 2013 and $60 in the six months ended June 30, 2014. Depreciation expense was $250 in the six months ended June 30, 2013 and in the six months ended June 30, 2014.

OPERATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

Operating expenses decreased by $2,849, from $16,731 in the six months ended June 30, 2013 to $13,822 in the six months ended June 30, 2014. Operating expenses primarily consist of general and administrative expenses (G&A) and professional fees. G&A expenses, made up primarily of office expenses and outside services consisting of stock transfer fees and filing fees, increased by $533, from $5,780 in the six months ended June 30, 2013 to $6,313 in the six months ended June 30, 2014. Professional fees, made up of accounting, bookkeeping, and legal fees decreased by $3,500, from $8,600 for the six months ended June 30, 2013 to $5,100 in the six months ended June 30, 2014. These are fees we pay to accountants and attorneys throughout the year for performing various tasks. The bulk of the decrease in expense was due to the Company’s accounting and bookkeeping expenses in 2013, when comparing the same period in 2014. Our expenses to date are largely due to professional fees that include accounting, consulting and legal fees.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are and will continue to be an insignificant participant in the business of seeking mergers with and acquisitions of business entities. A large number of established and well-financed entities, including venture capital firms, are active in mergers and acquisitions of companies. Nearly all such entities have significantly greater financial resources, technical expertise and managerial capabilities than us and, consequently, we will be at a competitive disadvantage in identifying possible business opportunities and successfully completing a business combination. Moreover, we will also compete in seeking merger or acquisition candidates with other public companies, some of which may also have funds available for use by an acquisition candidate.

Market Price

There is no current trading market for our Common Stock and there has been no trading market to date. There is no assurance that a trading market will ever develop or, if such a market does develop, that it will continue.

Options, Warranties and Other Equity Items

There are no outstanding options or warrants to purchase, nor any securities convertible into, shares of our Common Stock. Additionally, there are no shares of Common Stock that could be sold pursuant to Rule 144 under the Securities Act or that we had agreed to register under the Securities Act for sale by security holders. Further, there are no shares of Common Stock of the Company being, or proposed to be, publicly offered by the Company.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company's Chief Executive Officer is responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures for the Company.

EVALUATION OF DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

For purposes of this Item 4., the term disclosure controls and procedures means controls and other procedures of the Company (i) that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (15 U.S.C. 78a et seq. and hereinafter the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”), and (ii) include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our disclosure controls and procedures do not yet comply with the requirements in (i) and (ii) above and are not effective.

On June 30, 2014 our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have reviewed the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act) as of the period covered by this report, and have concluded that (i) the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are not effective to ensure that material information relating to the Company is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Commission due to a material weakness identified, and that (ii) the Company’s controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company's management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

The material weakness identified relates to the lack of proper segregation of duties. The Company believes that the lack of proper segregation of duties is due to the Company’s limited resources.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with our evaluation that occurred during our first quarter as of June 30, 2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

MANAGEMENT’S QUARTERLY REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROLS OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a – 15(f). Management conducted an assessment as of June 30, 2014 of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on that evaluation, management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was ineffective as of June 30, 2014.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements should they occur. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with the control procedure may deteriorate.

This Quarterly Report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit us to provide only management’s report in this Quarterly Report. As required by SEC Rule 13a-15(b), our company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief Executive Officer, of the effectiveness of its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective at the reasonable assurance level.

INHERENT LIMITATIONS ON EFFECTIVENESS OF CONTROLS

The Company's management does not expect that its disclosure controls or its internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system's objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Not Applicable. There are no legal proceedings that are required to be disclosed in accordance with Item 103 of Regulation S-K.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Our business and plan of operation is subject to numerous risk factors, including, but not limited to, the following:

Our limited operating history makes its potential difficult to assess.

We have limited assets and financial resources. We will, in all likelihood, continue to sustain operating expenses without corresponding revenue, at least until the consummation of a business combination. This will most likely result in the Company incurring a net operating loss, which will increase continuously until we can consummate a business combination with a target company. There is no assurance that we can identify such a target company and consummate such a business combination.

We have no agreement for a business combination and no minimum requirements for a business combination.

We have no current arrangement, agreement or understanding with respect to engaging in a business combination with a specific entity. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in identifying and evaluating suitable business opportunities or in concluding a business combination. No particular industry or specific business within an industry has been selected for a target company. We have not established a specific length of operating history or a specified level of earnings, assets, net worth or other criteria which we will require a target company to have achieved, or without which we would not consider a business combination with such business entity. Accordingly, we may enter into a business combination with a business entity having no significant operating history, losses, limited or no potential for immediate earnings, limited assets, negative net worth or other negative characteristics. There is no assurance that we will be able to negotiate a business combination on terms favorable to us.

There is no assurance of success or profitability of the Company.

There is no assurance that we will acquire a favorable business opportunity. Even if we should become involved in a business opportunity, there is no assurance that we will generate revenue or profits, or that the market price of our outstanding shares will be increased thereby. The type of business to be acquired may be one that desires to avoid effecting its own public offering and the accompanying expense, delays, uncertainties and federal and state requirements which purport to protect investors. Because of our limited capital, it is more likely than not that any acquisition by the Company will involve other parties whose primary interest is the acquisition of control of a publicly traded company. Moreover, any business opportunity acquired may be currently unprofitable or present other negative factors.

We may not be able to diversify its business.

Because we have limited financial resources, it is unlikely that we will be able to diversify our acquisitions or operations. Our probable inability to diversify our activities into more than one area will subject us to economic fluctuations within a particular business or industry and therefore increase the risks associated with our operations.

We have limited officers and directors.

Because management consists of only three persons, while seeking a business combination, Joseph Passalaqua, the President of the Company, Garry McHenry, the Secretary of the Company, and Devon Nish, the Director of the Company, will be the only individuals responsible in conducting the day-to-day operations of the Company. We do not benefit from having access to multiple judgments that a greater number of directors or officers would provide, and we will rely completely on the judgment of our two officers and one director when selecting a target company. Mr. Passalaqua, Mr. McHenry, and Mr. Nish anticipate devoting only a limited amount of time per month to the business of the Company. Mr. Passalaqua, Mr. McHenry, and Mr. Nish have not entered into a written employment agreement with the Company and they are not expected to do so. We do not anticipate obtaining key man life insurance on Mr. Passalaqua, Mr. McHenry, or Mr. Nish. The loss of the services of Mr. Passalaqua, Mr. McHenry, and Mr. Nish would adversely affect development of our business and our likelihood of continuing operations.

We depend on management and management's participation is limited.

We will be entirely dependent upon the experience of our officers and directors in seeking, investigating, and acquiring a business and in making decisions regarding our operations. It is possible that, from time to time, the inability of such persons to devote their full time attention to the Company will cause the Company to lose an opportunity.

Conflicts of interest exist between the Company and its management.

Certain conflicts of interest exist between the Company and its officers and directors. They have other business interests to which they currently devote attention, and are expected to continue to do so. As a result, conflicts of interest may arise that can be resolved only through their exercise of judgment in a manner that is consistent with their fiduciary duties to the Company.

It is anticipated that our principal stockholders may actively negotiate or otherwise consent to the purchase of a portion of their common stock as a condition to, or in connection with, a proposed merger or acquisition transaction. In this process, our principal stockholders may consider their own personal pecuniary benefit rather than the best interest of other Company shareholders. Depending upon the nature of a proposed transaction, Company stockholders other than the principal stockholders may not be afforded the opportunity to approve or consent to a particular transaction.

We may need additional financing.

We have very limited funds, and such funds, may not be adequate to take advantage of any available business opportunities. Even if our currently available funds prove to be sufficient to pay for our operations until we are able to acquire an interest in, or complete a transaction with, a business opportunity, such funds will clearly not be sufficient to enable it to exploit the opportunity. Thus, the ultimate success of the Company will depend, in part, upon our availability to raise additional capital. In the event that we require modest amounts of additional capital to fund our operations until we are able to complete a business acquisition or transaction, such funds, are expected to be provided by the principal shareholders. However, we have not investigated the availability, source, or terms that might govern the acquisition of the additional capital, which is expected to be required in order to exploit a business opportunity, and will not do so until we have determined the level of need for such additional financing. There is no assurance that additional capital will be available from any source or, if available, that it can be obtained on terms acceptable to the Company. If not available, our operations will be limited to those that can be financed with our modest capital.

We may need to depend upon outside advisors.

To supplement the business experience of our officers and directors, we may be required to employ accountants, technical experts, appraisers, attorneys, or other consultants or advisors. The selection of any such advisors will be made by our officers, without any input by shareholders. Furthermore, it is anticipated that such persons may be engaged on an as needed basis without a continuing fiduciary or other obligation to the Company. In the event the officers and directors of the Company consider it necessary to hire outside advisors, they may elect to hire persons who are affiliates, if those affiliates are able to provide the required services.

We may have significant competition for business opportunities and combinations and may be at a competitive disadvantage in completing a business combination.

We are and will continue to be an insignificant participant in the business of seeking mergers with and acquisitions of business entities. A large number of established and well-financed entities, including venture capital firms are active in mergers and acquisitions of companies. Nearly all such entities have significantly greater financial resources, technical expertise and managerial capabilities than us and, consequently, we will be at a competitive disadvantage in identifying possible business opportunities and successfully completing a business combination. Moreover, we will also compete in seeking merger or acquisition candidates with public companies, some of which may also have funds available for use by an acquisition candidate.

We lack market research and a marketing organization.

We have neither conducted, nor have others made available to it, market research indicating that demand exists for the transactions contemplated by the Company. In the event demand exists for a transaction of the type contemplated by the Company, there is no assurance the Company will be successful in completing any such business combination.

We do not have any long term contracts with our customers and the contracts that are in place may be terminated at will.

We do not have any long-term agreements with the customers of our payphones and they may terminate our contract to operate at will. Therefore, there is no continuity to our business. Although we are trying to expand our customer base, our efforts are still in the preliminary stages. If we lose our current customers and do not have any potential new customers at the time of such termination, our results of operations and financial condition will be adversely affected.

Our business is seasonal.

We do not own any intellectual property.

We do not own any patents or trademarks. Companies in the telecommunications industry and other industries in which we compete own large numbers of patents, copyrights and trademarks. Such companies are known to frequently enter into litigation based on allegations of infringement or other violations of intellectual property rights. As we face increasing competition, the possibility of intellectual property claims against us grows. We might not be able to withstand any third-party claims or rights against their use.

Government regulations may change or be added that may adversely affect our ability to conduct, or how we conduct, our business.

In addition, while the FCC currently requires the sellers of long distance toll free services to pay us $0.494 cents per call, such regulations may be reduced in scope or effect or repealed, which would have a negative effect upon our revenue stream. We have no control over what rules and regulations the state and federal regulatory agencies require us to follow now or in the future. It is possible for future regulations to be so financially demanding that they cause us to go out of business.

Further, the Telecommunications Act of 1996, regulatory and judicial actions and the development of new technologies, products and services have created opportunities for alternative telecommunication service providers, many of which are subject to fewer regulatory constraints. We are unable to predict definitively the impact that the ongoing changes in the telecommunications industry will ultimately have on our business, results of operations or financial condition. The financial impact will depend on several factors, including the timing, extent and success of competition in our markets, the timing and outcome of various regulatory proceedings and any appeals, and the timing, extent and success of our pursuit of new opportunities resulting from the Telecommunications Act of 1996 and technological advances.

It is probable that there will be a change in control of the Company and/or management.

In conjunction with completion of a business acquisition, it is anticipated that we will issue an amount of our authorized, but un-issued common stock that represents the greater majority of the voting power and equity of the Company, which will, in all likelihood, result in stockholders of a target company obtaining a controlling interest in the Company. As a condition of the business combination agreement, the current stockholder(s) of the Company may agree to sell or transfer all or a portion of our common stock he/they own(s) so to provide the target company with all or majority control. The resulting change in control of the Company will likely result in removal of the present officers and directors of the Company and a corresponding reduction in or elimination of his/their participation in the future affairs of the Company.

Stockholders will likely suffer a dilution of the value of their shares upon a business combination.

A business combination normally will involve the issuance of a significant number of additional shares. Depending upon the value of the assets acquired in such business combination, the per-share value of our common stock may increase or decrease, perhaps significantly.

No public market exists and no public market may develop for the Company’s common stock.

There is currently no public market for our common stock, and no assurance can be given that a market will develop or that a shareholder ever will be able to liquidate his investment without considerable delay, if at all. If a market should develop, the price may be highly volatile. Factors such as those discussed in this "Risk Factors” section may have a significant impact upon the market price of the securities offered hereby. Owing to the low price of the securities, many brokerage firms may not be willing to effect transactions in the securities. Even if a purchaser finds a broker willing to effect a transaction in these securities, the combination of brokerage commissions, state transfer taxes, if any, and any other selling costs may exceed the sales proceeds.

There may be restrictions imposed by states on the sale of common stock by investors.

Because the securities registered hereunder have not been registered for resale under the Blue Sky laws of any state, the holders of such shares and persons who desire to purchase them in any trading market that might develop in the future, should be aware, that there may be significant state Blue Sky law restrictions upon the ability of investors to sell the securities and of purchasers to purchase the securities. Accordingly, investors should consider the secondary market for our securities to be a limited one.

We may be subject to additional risks because of doing business in a foreign country.

We may effectuate a business combination with a merger target whose business operations or even headquarters, place of formation or primary place of business are located outside the United States of America. In such event, we may face the significant additional risks associated with doing business in that country. In addition to the language barriers, different presentations of financial information, different business practices, and other cultural differences and barriers that may make it difficult to evaluate such a merger target, ongoing business risks result from the international political situation, uncertain legal systems and applications of law, prejudice against foreigners, corrupt practices, uncertain economic policies and potential political and economic instability that may be exacerbated in various foreign countries.

The consummation of a business combination may subject us and our stockholders to federal and state taxes.

Federal and state tax consequences will, in all likelihood, be major considerations in any business combination that we may undertake. Currently, such transactions may be structured to result in tax-free treatment to both companies, pursuant to various federal and state tax provisions. We intend to structure any business combination so as to minimize the federal and state tax consequences to both the Company and the target entity; however, there can be no assurance that such business combination will meet the statutory requirements of a tax-free reorganization or that the parties will obtain the intended tax-free treatment upon a transfer of stock or assets. A non-qualifying reorganization could result in the imposition of both federal and state taxes, which may have an adverse effect on both parties to the transaction.

Regulation of Penny Stocks

The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission") has adopted a number of rules to regulate “penny stocks." Such rules include Rule 3a51-1 and Rules 15g-1 through 15g-9 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Because our securities may constitute “penny stocks" within the meaning of the rules (as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, largely traded in the National Association of Securities Dealers’ (NASD) OTC Bulletin Board or the "Pink Sheets", the rules may apply to us and to our securities.

The Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 that established sales practice requirements low price securities. Unless the transaction is, exempt, it shall be unlawful for a broker or dealer to sell a penny stock to, or to effect the purchase of a penny stock by, any person unless prior to the transaction: (i) the broker or dealer has approved the person’s account for transactions in penny stock pursuant to this rule and (ii) the broker or dealer has received from the person a written agreement to the transaction setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.

In order to approve a person's account for transactions in penny stock, the broker or dealer must: (a) obtain from the person information concerning the person's financial situation, investment experience, and investment objectives; (b) reasonably determine that transactions in penny stock are suitable for that person, and that the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters that the person reasonably may be expected to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stock; (c) deliver to the person a written statement setting forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the determination (i) stating in a highlighted format that it is unlawful for the broker or dealer to affect a transaction in penny stock unless the broker or dealer has received, prior to the transaction, a written agreement to the transaction from the person; and (ii) stating in a highlighted format immediately preceding the customer signature line that (iii) the broker or dealer is required to provide the person with the written statement; and (iv) the person should not sign and return the written statement to the broker or dealer if it does not accurately reflect the person’s financial situation, investment experience, and investment objectives; and (d) receive from the person a manually signed and dated copy of the written statement.

It is also required that disclosure be made as to the risks of investing in penny stock and the commissions payable to the broker-dealer, as well as current price quotations and the remedies and rights available in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Statements, on a monthly basis, must be sent to the investor listing recent prices for the Penny Stock and information on the limited market. Shareholders should be aware that, according to Securities and Exchange Commission Release No. 34-29093, the market for penny stocks has suffered in recent years from patterns of fraud and abuse. Such patterns include (i) control of the market for the security by one or a few broker-dealers that are often related to the promoter or issuer; (ii) manipulation of prices through prearranged matching of purchases and sales and false and misleading press releases; (iii) "boiler room" practices involving high-pressure sales tactics and unrealistic price projections by inexperienced sales persons; (iv) excessive and undisclosed bid-ask differential and markups by selling broker-dealers; and (v) the wholesale dumping of the same securities by promoters and broker dealers after prices have been manipulated to a desired level, along with the resulting inevitable collapse of those prices and with consequent investor losses. We are aware of the abuses that have occurred historically in the penny stock market. Although we do not expect to be in a position to dictate the behavior of the market or of broker-dealers who participate in the market, we will strive within the confines of practical limitations to prevent the described patterns from being established with respect to our securities.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

As of December 31, 2013, Biolog has 100,000,000 shares of common stock authorized at $0.001 par value per share and 40,436,710 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. As of June 30, 2014, Biolog has 100,000,000 shares of common stock authorized at $0.001 par value per share and 40,436,740 shares of common stock issued and outstanding

As of the year ended December 31, 2013 and the quarter ended June 30, 2014, Biolog had 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock authorized at $0.001 and 0 shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

We have not defaulted on any senior securities.

ITEM 4. MINING SAFETY DISCLOSURE

Not Applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

There is no other information that should be disclosed.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS


Exhibit Number	Description

EXHIBIT 3.1	Articles of Amendment to Articles of Incorporation (Profit)**
EXHIBIT 3.2	By-laws**
EXHIBIT 3.1	Certificate for Renewal and Revival of Charter**
EXHIBIT 31.1	Biolog, Inc. Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302.
EXHIBIT 31.2	Biolog, Inc. Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302.
EXHIBIT 32.1	Biolog, Inc. Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
EXHIBIT 32.2	Biolog, Inc. Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, As Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
101*	Interactive Data Files for Highlight Networks, Inc. 10Q for the Period Ended June 30, 2014
101.INS*	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LAB*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

*Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, these interactive date files are deemed not filed or part of the registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 or Section 18 of the Securities Act of 1934 and otherwise are not subject to liability.

**Previously submitted and incorporated by reference herein.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 12 of the Securities Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	BIOLOG, INC.

	Date: July 30, 2014

	By: /s/ Joseph C. Passalaqua Name: Joseph C. Passalaqua Title: President; Principal Executive Officer By: /s/ Garry McHenry Name: Garry McHenry Title: Secretary; Principal Financial Officer By: /s/ Devon Nish Name: Devon Nish Title: Director

Biolog, Inc 10-Q