UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q
_______________________________

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the quarterly period ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2004 OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File No.:	1-13573-01
	1-13573

INLAND FIBER GROUP, LLC
FIBER FINANCE CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

DELAWARE	91-1217136
DELAWARE	91-1851612
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
625 Madison Avenue, Suite 10-B, New York, NY	10022
6400 Highway 66 Klamath Falls, OR 97601	97601
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: ~~212~~ 541-~~755~~884-~~1100~~2240

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes o No x

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Unaudited)

			Form 10-Q
			Table of Contents
Part I.			Financial Information	Page
Part	I	.	Financial Information	Page
Item	1	.	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended ~~March~~June 3130, 2004 and 2003	1
Item	1	.	Condensed Consolidated ~~Balance~~Statements ~~Sheets~~of atOperations ~~March~~for ~~31,~~the ~~2004~~six ~~and~~months ~~December~~ended 31June 30, 2004 and 2003	2
Item	1	.	Condensed Consolidated ~~Statements~~Balance ofSheets ~~Cash~~at ~~Flows~~June ~~for~~30, ~~the~~2004 ~~three~~and ~~months~~December ~~ended March~~ 31, ~~2004 and~~ 2003	3
Item	1	.	~~Notes to~~ Condensed Consolidated ~~Financial~~ Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2004 and 2003	4
Item	21	.	~~Management's~~Notes ~~Discussion~~to ~~and~~Condensed ~~Analysis~~Consolidated of Financial ~~Condition and Results of Operations~~Statements	95
Item	42	.	~~Controls~~Management's Discussion and ~~Procedures~~Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	1310
Part II.			Other Information	14
Item	4	.	Controls and Procedures	16
Item	1		Legal Proceedings	14
Part	II	.	OTHER INFORMATION
Item	21	.	~~Changes~~Legal ~~in Securities and Use of Proceeds~~Proceedings	1516
Item	32	.	~~Defaults~~Changes ~~Upon~~in ~~Senior~~ Securities and Use of Proceeds	1517
Item	43	.	~~Submission~~Defaults ofUpon ~~Matters~~Senior ~~to a Vote of Security Holders~~Securities	1517
Item	54	.	~~Other~~Submission ~~Information~~of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	1517
Item	65	.	~~Exhibits~~Other ~~and Reports on Form 8-K~~Information	1617
Item	6	.	Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K	18

INLAND FIBER GROUP, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(IN THOUSANDS)
(UNAUDITED)


		Three MonthsEnded June 30,
		2004			2003


Revenues (including $345 (2004) and $8,300 (2003) to affiliates)	$	16,494		$	14,727
Cost of timber harvested		(2,918	)		(3,104	)
Depletion, depreciation and road amortization		(4,856	)		(3,438	)
Cost of timber and property sales		(9,915	)		(8,640	)

Gross loss		(1,195	)		(455	)

Selling, general and administrative expenses		(2,046	)		(1,382	)
Equity in net loss of affiliate		(4,356	)		(4,906	)

Operating loss		(7,597	)		(6,743	)

Interest expense		(5,385	)		(5,399	)
Amortization of deferred financing fees		(168	)		(169	)
Other income, net		30			37


Net loss	$	(13,120	)	$	(12,274	)



See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

~~INLAND~~PART ~~FIBER~~1. ~~GROUP,~~FINANCIAL ~~LLC~~INFORMATION

~~CONDENSED~~ITEM ~~CONSOLIDATED~~1. ~~BALANCE~~FINANCIAL ~~SHEETS (IN THOUSANDS)~~ STATEMENTS

2INLAND FIBER GROUP, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY

~~INLAND~~ ~~FIBER~~CONDENSED ~~GROUP,~~CONSOLIDATED ~~LLC~~STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (IN THOUSANDS) (UNAUDITED)

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOWS (IN THOUSANDS) (UNAUDITED)

		Six Months Ended June 30,
		2004			2003

Revenues (including $345 (2004) and $8,300 (2003) to affiliates)	$	19,079		$	21,558
Cost of timber harvested		(4,520	)		(6,572	)
Depletion, depreciation and road amortization		(6,002	)		(6,321	)
Cost of timber and property sales		(9,944	)		(9,114	)

Gross loss		(1,387	)		(449	)

Selling, general and administrative expenses		(4,220	)		(3,039	)
Equity in net loss of affiliate		(9,274	)		(7,849	)

Operating loss		(14,881	)		(11,337	)

Interest expense		(10,800	)		(10,784	)
Amortization of deferred financing fees		(337	)		(338	)
Other income, net		68			74


Net loss	$	(25,950	)	$	(22,385	)



See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements

3 2

~~INLAND FIBER~~PART ~~GROUP, LLC (formerly U~~1.S. ~~Timberlands~~FINANCIAL ~~Klamath~~INFORMATION ~~Falls, LLC) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (In thousands, except as otherwise indicated)~~

ITEM 1. ~~Business~~FINANCIAL ~~and~~STATEMENTS ~~Basis of Presentation~~

Business


INLAND FIBER GROUP, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(IN THOUSANDS)
		June 30,			December 31,
		2004			2003

		(Unaudited)			*
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	597		$	1,447
Accounts receivable		616			530
Other receivables		658			332
Notes receivable		788			103
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		104			220

Total current assets		2,763			2,632

Timber and timberlands, net		113,375			129,002
Investment in affiliates		24,139			33,414
Property, plant and equipment, net		802			833
Notes receivable, less current portion		10			10
Restricted cash		155			154
Deferred financing fees, net		2,286			2,623


Total assets	$	143,530		$	168,668


LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' EQUITY/(DEFICIENCY)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable		1,509			525
Accrued liabilities		1,593			511
Accrued bond interest		2,722			2,830
Customer deposit		3,991			5,000
Payable to managing member and affiliates		147			284

Total current liabilities		9,962			9,150


Long-term debt		225,000			225,000


Members' deficiency
Managing member's interest		(936	)		(674	)
Nonmanaging members' interest		(90,496	)		(64,808	)

Total members' deficiency		(91,432	)		(65,482	)
					`

Total liabilities and members' deficiency	$	143,530		$	168,668

~~The~~* ~~unaudited~~Derived ~~condensed~~from ~~consolidated~~audited ~~financial~~Consolidated ~~statements~~Balance ~~include~~Sheet ~~the~~as ~~accounts~~ of ~~Inland~~December ~~Fiber Group~~31, ~~LLC~~2003 ~~("IFG"),~~See anotes ~~Delaware limited liability company, and its wholly owed subsidiary, Fiber Finance Corp. ("Finance Corp."), collectively referred~~ to ~~hereafter~~unaudited ascondensed ~~the~~consolidated ~~Company.~~financial Fiber Finance Corp. serves as the co-obligor for IFG's 9-5/8% Senior Notes due 2007 (the "Notes"). Finance Corp has nominal assets and does not conduct operations. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. statements

~~The~~3 primary activities of the Company are the growing of trees and the sale of logs and standing timber to third party wood processors and the sale of excess land. The Company's timber is located principally in Oregon, east of the Cascade Range. Logs harvested from the timberlands are sold to unaffiliated domestic conversion facilities. These logs are processed for sale as lumber, plywood and other wood products, primarily for use in new residential home construction, home remodeling and repair and general industrial applications.

~~Prior~~ INLAND toFIBER ~~July 2003~~GROUP, Pacific Fiber Company, LP, a master limited partnership (the "MLP") (formerly U.S. Timberlands Company, L.P.), owned a 99% non-managing member interest in the Company. The MLP was formed on June 27, 1997 to acquire and own substantially all of the equity interests in the Company. Timber Resource Services, LLC ~~(formerly~~AND ~~known~~SUBSIDIARY ~~as U.S. Timberlands Services Company, LLC, the "Manager") manages the business of the Company and owns a 1% non-voting membership interest in the Company.~~

OnCONDENSED ~~October~~CONSOLIDATED ~~17,~~STATEMENTS ~~2002,~~OF ~~the~~CASH ~~MLP announced that it had signed~~FLOWS ~~a definitive agreement to be acquired by an acquisition company formed by a group led by senior management~~ (~~the~~IN ~~"Privatization Transaction"~~THOUSANDS). ~~The group~~ beneficially owned 36.4% of the combined outstanding limited partnership units of the MLP consisting of 16% of the common units and 98% of the subordinated units. The definitive agreement contemplated a cash tender offer for 100% of the outstanding common limited partnership units not already owned by the acquiring entity or its affiliates for $3.00 per unit in cash, followed by a merger of the acquisition company with and into the MLP, pursuant to which each common limited partnership unit not already owned by the acquiring entity or its affiliates would be converted into the right to receive $3.00 per unit in cash. The tender offer commenced on November 19, 2002 and was completed on March 6, 2003. In connection with the tender offer, approximately 71% of the MLP's common units were tendered. The remaining common units held by non-affiliates not purchased in the tender offer were converted into the right to receive $3.00 per common unit in the merger which was completed on June 26, 2003. (UNAUDITED)


	Six Months Ended June 30,
		2004			2003

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities	$	(185	)	$	647


CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
Timber, timberlands and road additions		(663	)		(1,619	)
Sale (purchase) of property, plant and equipment - net		(2	)		8

Net cash used in investing activities		(665	)		(1,611	)


CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Capital contribution					1,238

Net cash used in financing activities					1,238


Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(850	)		274
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period		1,447			965


Cash and cash equivalents - end of period	$	597		$	1,239


Noncash activities:
Contribution of timberlands for investment in affiliate	$	—		$	11,572

Supplemental cash flow information:
Cash paid for interest expense	$	10,908		$	10,829


See notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements

~~INLAND FIBER GROUP, LLC (formerly U.S. Timberlands Klamath Falls, LLC) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) (In thousands, except as otherwise indicated)~~ 4

INLAND ~~Subsequent~~FIBER ~~to the Privatization Transaction~~GROUP, ~~the 99% interest in the Company held by the MLP was transferred in a series of transactions to a newly-formed limited liability company, IFG Holdings,~~ LLC. ~~IFG~~AND ~~Holdings,~~SUBSIDIARY ~~LLC~~ is Notes wholly owned by American Forest Resources, LLC ("AFR") (formerly known as US Timberlands Yakima, LLC), in which the Company holds a preferred equity interest. As part of this reorganization of the ownership structure of the Company, a Board of Directors was elected for the Company to ~~supervise~~Condensed ~~its~~Consolidated ~~operations~~Financial ~~and a~~Statements ~~new management arrangement was established under which the Manager, whose~~ ~~interest~~ (In ~~was converted into a 1% nonvoting interest in the Company~~thousands, ~~provides comprehensive~~except ~~timber~~as ~~management~~otherwise ~~services to the Company pursuant to a fee-based management agreement.~~ indicated)

As1. aBusiness ~~result~~and ofBasis ~~the Privatization Transaction described above, the Company is an indirect 99% owned subsidiary~~ of ~~AFR.~~ Presentation

~~Basis of Presentation~~Business

The ~~These~~ unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements ~~have~~ ~~been~~include ~~prepared~~the byaccounts ~~the~~of ~~Company~~Inland Fiber Group, ~~pursuant~~LLC to(“IFG”), a ~~the~~Delaware ~~rules~~limited liability company, and ~~regulations~~its ofwholly owned subsidiary, Fiber Finance Corp. (“Finance Corp.”), collectively referred to hereafter as the ~~United~~Company. ~~States~~Fiber ~~Securities~~Finance ~~and~~Corp. ~~Exchange~~serves ~~Commission~~as ~~for~~the ~~reporting~~co-obligor onfor ~~Form~~IFG’s 109-Q.5/8% Senior Notes due 2007 ~~Accordingly,~~ (the ~~certain~~“Notes”). ~~information~~Finance Corp has nominal assets and ~~footnotes~~does ~~required~~not inconduct ~~financial~~operations. ~~statements~~All intercompany transactions have been ~~prepared~~ eliminated in ~~accordance~~consolidation. The ~~with~~primary ~~accounting~~activities ~~principles~~of ~~generally~~the ~~accepted~~Company inare the growing of trees and the sale of logs and standing timber to third party wood processors ~~United~~ and ~~States~~the sale of ~~America~~excess ~~have~~land. ~~been~~The ~~condensed~~Company’s ortimber ~~omitted~~is ~~from~~located ~~these~~principally ~~statements~~in Oregon, east of the Cascade Range. Logs harvested ~~These~~ from ~~unaudited~~the ~~condensed~~timberlands ~~consolidated~~are ~~financial~~sold ~~statements~~to ~~were~~unaffiliated ~~prepared~~domestic ~~on a~~conversion ~~consistent~~facilities. ~~basis~~These ~~with~~logs are processed for sale as lumber, plywood and ~~should~~other bewood ~~read~~products, primarily for use in ~~conjunction~~new ~~with~~residential ~~the~~home ~~consolidated~~construction, home remodeling and repair and general industrial ~~financial~~ applications. Prior ~~statements~~to ~~included~~July in2003, ~~the~~Pacific Fiber Company's, ~~2003~~LP, ~~Annual~~a ~~Report~~master onlimited ~~Form~~partnership ~~10-K~~(the “MLP”) (formerly U.S. Timberlands Company, ~~Operating~~ L.P.), ~~results~~owned ~~for~~a 99% non-managing member interest in the ~~quarter~~Company. ~~ended~~The ~~March~~MLP 31was formed on June 27, ~~2004~~1997 ~~are~~to ~~not~~acquire ~~necessarily~~and ~~indicative~~own substantially all of the ~~results~~equity ~~that~~interests ~~may~~in bethe ~~expected~~Company. ~~for~~Timber ~~the~~Resource ~~full~~Services, ~~year~~LLC or(formerly ~~any~~known ~~other~~as ~~period~~U.S. ~~In the~~Timberlands ~~opinion~~Services ~~of management~~Company, LLC, the ~~accompanying~~“Manager”) ~~unaudited~~manages ~~consolidated~~the ~~financial statements~~business ~~include~~of ~~all~~the ~~normal~~Company ~~recurring~~and ~~adjustments~~owns ~~necessary~~a to1% ~~present~~non-voting ~~fairly the~~membership ~~information~~interest ~~for~~in ~~such~~the ~~period~~Company.

~~The~~ ~~accompanying~~On ~~condensed~~October ~~consolidated~~17, ~~statements~~2002, ~~have been~~the ~~prepared~~MLP ~~assuming~~announced that ~~the~~it ~~Company~~had ~~will~~signed ~~continue~~a asdefinitive aagreement ~~going~~to ~~concern.~~be ~~In December~~acquired ~~2003,~~by ~~the~~an ~~trustee~~acquisition ~~under~~company ~~the~~formed ~~indenture~~by a group led by senior management ("the ~~Indenture"~~“Privatization Transaction”). ~~governing the~~The ~~Company's~~group ~~$225,000~~beneficially ofowned 936.54% ~~Senior~~of ~~Notes,~~the ~~which~~combined outstanding ~~mature~~limited inpartnership ~~2007~~units ~~commenced litigation~~of ~~against~~ the ~~Company~~MLP ~~and~~consisting ~~others~~of ~~alleging,~~16% ~~among~~of ~~other matters, that~~ the ~~Company~~common ~~has~~units ~~violated~~and ~~certain~~98% ~~covenants~~of ~~contained in~~ the ~~Indenture~~subordinated units. The ~~Company~~definitive ~~has~~ agreement ~~denied~~contemplated ~~all~~a cash tender offer for 100% of the ~~allegations~~outstanding ~~and~~common ~~made~~limited apartnership ~~motion~~units tonot ~~dismiss~~already owned by the acquiring ~~complaint~~entity or its affiliates for $3. In00 ~~May~~per ~~2004,~~unit ~~the~~in ~~Company~~cash, ~~received~~followed by a ~~Notice~~merger of ~~Default~~the ~~from~~acquisition ~~the~~company ~~Trustee~~with ~~covering certain~~and ofinto the MLP, ~~allegations~~pursuant into ~~the~~which ~~complaint.~~each Incommon ~~the~~limited ~~event~~partnership ~~the~~unit ~~trustee~~not ~~prevails in~~already ~~the~~owned ~~litigation~~by the ~~Trustee~~acquiring ~~will~~entity ~~have~~or its affiliates would be converted into the right to ~~demand~~receive ~~repayment~~$3.00 ~~and~~per ~~accelerate the~~unit ~~maturity~~in ofcash. ~~the~~The ~~notes.~~tender Ifoffer ~~such~~commenced ~~event~~on ~~occurs~~November 19, 2002 and ~~the~~was ~~Company~~completed ~~is unable to~~on ~~effect~~ March an6, ~~amendment~~2003. orIn aconnection ~~restructuring~~with of the ~~notes~~tender offer, approximately 71% of the ~~Company'~~MLP’s ~~ability~~common tounits were tendered. The remaining ~~continue~~ common asunits aheld ~~going~~by ~~concern~~non-affiliates ~~would~~not bepurchased in ~~substantial~~the ~~doubt.~~tender ~~The~~offer ~~consolidated financial~~were ~~statements~~converted dointo ~~not~~the ~~include~~right ~~any~~to ~~adjustments~~receive ~~that~~$3.00 ~~might~~per ~~result~~common unit ~~from~~in the ~~outcome~~ ofmerger ~~this~~which ~~uncertainty.~~was ~~The Company~~completed ~~and~~on ~~its~~June ~~legal~~26, ~~counsel~~2003. ~~believe~~ Subsequent to the ~~litigation~~Privatization Transaction, asthe ~~well~~99% asinterest in the ~~Notice~~ Company held by the MLP was transferred in a series of ~~Default~~transactions to a newly-formed limited liability company, toIFG beHoldings, ~~without~~LLC. ~~merit~~IFG ~~and~~Holdings, ~~the~~LLC ~~Company~~is ~~intends~~wholly toowned ~~vigorously~~by ~~defend~~American Forest Resources, ~~itself~~ LLC (“AFR”) (formerly known as US Timberlands Yakima, LLC), in which the ~~lawsuit~~Company ~~(See~~holds ~~Note~~a 6preferred ~~for~~equity ainterest. As ~~further~~part ~~discussion~~of this reorganization of the ~~Litigation).~~ ownership structure of the

INLAND FIBER GROUP, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY ~~3. Investment~~ Notes into ~~Affiliate~~Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) (In thousands, except as otherwise indicated)

~~Since~~ ~~October 1999~~Company, ~~the~~a ~~Company~~Board ~~has~~of ~~owned~~Directors awas ~~redeemable~~elected ~~preferred~~for ~~membership~~the ~~interest~~Company ~~("Preferred~~to ~~LLC~~supervise ~~Interest")~~its inoperations ~~AFR,~~and ana ~~affiliate~~new ~~accounted~~management ~~for~~arrangement was established under which the ~~equity~~Manager, ~~method.~~whose Asinterest ~~described~~was inconverted ~~Note~~into a 1% tonon-voting ~~the~~interest ~~Financial Statements,~~ in ~~2003~~ the Company, ~~became~~provides ancomprehensive ~~indirect~~timber management ~~subsidiary~~services ofto ~~AFR~~the asCompany apursuant ~~result~~to of a ~~series~~fee-based ofmanagement ~~transactions~~agreement. As ~~culminating in the contribution to~~ a ~~subsidiary~~result of ~~AFR of~~ the ~~99%~~Privatization ~~non-managing~~Transaction ~~member's~~described ~~interest~~above, in the Company ~~previously~~is an indirect 99% owned bysubsidiary ~~the~~of ~~MLP~~AFR.

~~The~~Basis ~~following summarized unaudited financial information for AFR is presented on an AFR standalone basis without consolidation~~ of ~~the~~ Company's results of operations to avoid duplication, which would otherwise occur. The results of AFR presented below reflect purchase accounting relating to the Privatization Transaction for periods subsequent to March 6, 2003.Presentation

These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company, pursuant to the rules and regulations ~~(1)~~ of ~~Reflects~~the (United States Securities and Exchange Commission for reporting on Form 10-Q. Accordingly, certain information and footnotes required in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted from these statements. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared on a) ~~charges~~consistent basis with and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K. Operating results for the quarter and six month period ended June 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the full year or any other period. In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements include all normal recurring adjustments necessary to present fairly the information for such periods. The accompanying condensed consolidated statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. In December 2003, the trustee under the indenture (the “Indenture”) governing the Company’s $2225,~~221~~000 of 9-5/8% Senior Notes, which mature in 2007 commenced litigation against the Company and ~~$715~~others alleging, ~~respectively~~among ~~related~~other tomatters, that the ~~amortization~~Company has violated certain covenants contained in the Indenture. The Company has denied all of ~~$43~~the allegations and made a motion to dismiss the complaint. In May 2004,~~287~~ ~~excess~~the Company received a Notice of ~~cost~~Default ~~over~~from ~~deficiency~~the Trustee covering certain of the allegations in ~~net~~the complaint. ~~assets~~On ~~attributable~~July 29, 2004, the Court of Chancery dismissed the action without prejudice, based on its determination that the trustee under the Indenture lacked standing under the terms of the Indenture to 63bring an action against the Defendants since the requisite notice of default and opportunity to cure had not been provided to the Company prior to the time the action was commenced.6% The trustee ~~acquired~~ was ~~interest~~granted 30 days to file an amended complaint. The Company and ~~(b)~~its ~~benefit~~legal ofcounsel ~~$3,984~~believe ~~representing~~the ~~share~~litigation and the Notice of Default to be without merit and intend to vigorously defend the ~~Comapny's~~litigation that would arise if the trustee files an amended complaint. ~~net~~ In ~~loss~~the ~~for~~event ~~2003~~the ~~attributable~~trustee prevails in the litigation the Trustee will have the right to 63demand repayment and accelerate the maturity of the notes.6% ~~acquired~~If ~~interest~~such event occurs, ~~prior~~and the Company is unable to ~~acquisition~~effect an amendment or a restructuring of the notes, the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern would be in substantial doubt. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. (See Note 5 for a further discussion of the Litigation).

4.6 ~~Short-Term Debt~~

INLAND FIBER GROUP, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY
Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued)
(In thousands, except as otherwise indicated)

~~The~~ ~~Company had a credit facility with an affiliate of the Manager (the "Affiliate Credit Facility") consisting of a revolving line of credit of up to $12~~2.0 ~~which~~Timber ~~expired,~~and ~~by its terms, at the end of April 2002.~~Timberlands ~~The Company has sought to replace the Affiliate Credit Facility with a working~~ ~~capital~~ Timber ~~facility~~and ~~from~~Timberlands anconsisted unaffiliated third party but has been unable to obtain a working capital credit facility in amounts sufficient to fund its working capital needs from a traditional commercial lender. While the Company continues to seek a credit facility from an unaffiliated source, affiliated lenders have made short-term advances to the Company, payable on demand, at an annual interest rate of ~~10%. The affiliate has made no commitment to continue lending funds to~~ the ~~Company, and each request is reviewed on a~~following: ~~case-by-case basis.~~


		June 30,		December 31,
		2004		2003

Timber and logging roads	$	274,097	$	281,367
Timberlands		17,099		19,269
Seed orchard and nursery stock		1,267		1,451

		292,463		302,087
Less accumulated depletion and road amortization		179,088		173,085

	$	113,375	$	129,002

~~INLAND FIBER GROUP, LLC (formerly U~~3.S. ~~Timberlands~~Investment ~~Klamath~~in ~~Falls, LLC) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) (In thousands, except as otherwise indicated)~~ Affiliate

5 Since October 1999, the Company has owned a redeemable preferred membership interest ("Preferred LLC Interest") in AFR, an affiliate accounted for under the equity method. ~~Unit~~As described in Note 1 to the Financial Statements, in 2003 the Company became an indirect subsidiary of AFR as a result of a series of transactions culminating in the contribution to a subsidiary of AFR of the 99% non-~~based~~managing ~~Compensation~~member's ~~Plans~~interest in the Company previously owned by the MLP.

The ~~Prior~~following tosummarized ~~the~~unaudited ~~Privatization~~financial ~~Transaction~~information ~~the~~for ~~MLP~~AFR ~~had~~is apresented ~~Unit Option~~on ~~Plan,~~an ~~which~~AFR ~~permitted~~standalone ~~the~~basis ~~grant~~without consolidation of ~~unit options to employees and directors of~~ the Company's ~~who~~results ~~perform~~of ~~services~~operations ~~for~~to ~~the~~avoid ~~Company covering 857~~duplication,~~749~~ ~~Common Units. As permitted under SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure,~~ which ~~was~~would ~~issued~~otherwise ~~in December 2002 and amended SFAS No~~occur. ~~123, Accounting~~The ~~for~~results ~~Stock-Based~~of ~~Compensation,~~AFR ~~the Company has elected to follow the~~presented ~~intrinsic~~ below ~~value~~reflect ~~method~~purchase in accounting ~~for~~relating ~~its stock-based employee compensation arrangements as defined by Accounting Principles Board Opinion ("APB") No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued~~ to ~~Employees",~~the ~~and~~Privatization ~~related~~Transaction ~~interpretations. There would have been no effect on net loss~~ for ~~the three month~~ periods ~~ended~~subsequent to March 31 6, ~~2004 and~~ 2003 ~~if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No~~. ~~123 to stock-based employee compensation.~~

In connection with the Privatization Transaction described in Note 1, each outstanding unit option granted under the Unit Option Plan was converted into an option to receive, upon exercise, including payment of the exercise price, the $3.00 per unit merger consideration. Because the exercise price for each option was greater than the merger consideration, the Company does not expect any options to be exercised in the future.


		Three Months Ended			Three Months Ended			Six Months Ended			Six Months Ended
		June 30			June 30			June 30			June 30
		2004			2003			2004			2003


Net sales	$	2,742		$	1,540		$	4,722		$	4,116
Gross profit		371			(266	)		560			(230	)
Loss before equity
in the Company's Loss		(2,437	)		(2,760	)		(5,131	)		(4,988	)
Equity in Company's Loss		(10,684	)		(9,513	)		(20,816	)		(13,412	)
Net loss		(13,120	)		(12,274	)		(25,950	)		(18,401	)

(1) Reflects (a) charges of $1,920, $2,145, $4,140 and $2,860, respectively related to the amortization of $43,287 excess of cost over deficiency in net assets attributable to 63.6% acquired interest and (b) benefit of $3,984 representing share of the Company's net loss for 2003 attributable to 63.6% ~~Litigation~~acquired interest, prior to acquisition.

~~On December 19, 2003, an action was brought in the Court~~7 of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County by the trustee under the Indenture against the Company, Finance Corp., the Manager, American Forest Resources, LLC, Cascade Resource Holdings Group, LLC, and all of the directors of the Manager as of January 1, 2003 (collectively, the "Defendants"). The complaint alleges that the Company violated the provisions of the Indenture by transferring certain assets to its affiliates, the directors of the Company violated their fiduciary duty to the Company and that the transfers of the assets were fraudulent conveyances and subject to rescission. The trustee seeks a declaration that the Company has violated the terms of the Indenture, an injunction against the transfer of additional assets out of the ordinary course of business, damages and the imposition of a constructive trust on the assets transferred by the Company to its affiliates. In January 2004, the plaintiff's motion to schedule a preliminary injunction hearing with respect to further transfers to affiliates and for expedited discovery was denied. In connection with the denial of the plaintiff's motion, the Company agreed that, through the earlier of December 31, 2004 and the resolution of the lawsuit, it would provide at least thirty days' notice before entering into any transfer of assets to affiliates, other than payment of management fees. Discovery began in January 2004 and is ongoing. On February 6, 2004, the Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. On March 26, 2004 a motion to stay discovery pending the outcome of the Defendant's motion to dismiss was denied. In May 2004, a hearing was held with respect to defendants' motion to dismiss. The defendants expect a decision regarding their motion to dismiss within a few months. On May 17, 2004, the Company received a Notice of Default from the Trustee covering certain of the allegations in the complaint. The Company and its legal counsel believe the litigation, as well as, the Notice of Default to be without merit and the Company intends to vigorously defend itself in the lawsuit.

7 INLAND FIBER GROUP, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (continued) (In thousands, except as otherwise indicated)

~~INLAND FIBER GROUP, LLC (formerly U~~4.S. ~~Timberlands~~Unit-based ~~Klamath~~Compensation ~~Falls, LLC) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (concluded) (In thousands, except as otherwise indicated)~~ Plans

7 Prior to the Privatization Transaction the MLP had a Unit Option Plan, which permitted the grant of unit options to employees and directors of the Company who perform services for the Company covering 857,749 Common Units. ~~Long~~As ~~Term~~permitted ~~Debt~~under SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation-Transition and Disclosure, which was issued in December 2002 and amended SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation, the Company has elected to follow the intrinsic value method in accounting for its stock-based employee compensation arrangements as defined by Accounting Principles Board Opinion (“APB”) No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees”, and related interpretations. There would have been no effect on net loss for the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2004 and 2003 if the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee compensation.

~~The~~ ~~Company's~~In ~~long~~connection ~~term~~with ~~debt consists~~the ofPrivatization ~~$225,000~~Transaction ofdescribed 9in ~~5/8%~~Note ~~Senior~~1, ~~Notes~~each ~~(the~~outstanding ~~"Notes")~~unit ~~due~~option ~~2007,~~granted ~~which~~under ~~were issued~~the ~~jointly~~Unit ~~and~~Option ~~severally~~Plan was byconverted ~~the~~into ~~Company~~an ~~and~~option ~~Finance~~to ~~Corp.~~receive, aupon ~~wholly~~exercise, ~~owned subsidiary~~including payment of the ~~Company~~exercise ~~(collectively~~price, the ~~"Issuers")~~$3.00 ~~The~~per ~~Issuers~~unit ~~serve~~merger ~~as co-obligors of the Notes~~consideration. ~~The Notes represent unsecured general obligations~~ of Because the ~~Issuers~~exercise ~~and~~price ~~bear~~for ~~interest~~each atoption ~~9-5/8%~~was ~~payable~~greater ~~semiannually~~than inthe ~~arrears~~merger ~~on May 15 and November 15~~consideration, ~~and~~the ~~mature~~Company ondoes ~~November~~not ~~15,~~expect ~~2007~~any ~~unless~~options ~~previously redeemed.~~to ~~The~~ be ~~Notes~~exercised ~~are redeemable at the option of the Issuers~~ in ~~whole or in part at predetermined redemption prices plus accrued interest to~~ the ~~redemption date~~future.

~~The~~5. ~~Notes~~Litigation On ~~contain~~December ~~certain restrictive~~19, ~~covenants~~2003, ~~including~~an ~~limiting~~action was brought in the ~~ability~~Court of Chancery of the ~~Company~~State of Delaware in and ~~its~~for New Castle County by the ~~subsidiaries~~ trustee tounder ~~make~~the ~~cash~~Indenture ~~distributions~~against the Company, ~~incur~~Finance ~~additional~~Corp., ~~indebtedness~~the Manager, ~~sell~~American Forest Resources, LLC, Cascade Resource Holdings ~~assets~~ Group, orLLC, ~~harvest~~and ~~timber~~all inof ~~excess~~the directors of ~~certain~~the ~~limitations.~~Manager ~~Under~~as ~~certain~~of ~~restrictive covenants~~January 1, ~~during~~ 2003 ~~and 2002~~(collectively, the “Defendants”). The complaint alleges that the Company ~~was~~violated ~~and~~the ~~presently~~provisions isof ~~prohibited from~~the ~~making~~Indenture ~~distributions~~by transferring certain assets to its ~~members.~~affiliates, ~~Although~~the directors of the Company ~~believes~~violated ittheir ~~was and~~fiduciary isduty into ~~compliance with~~ the ~~covenants~~Company ~~contained~~and inthat the ~~Notes,~~transfers of the ~~trustee~~assets were fraudulent conveyances and ~~under~~ subject ~~the~~to ~~indenture~~rescission. ~~has~~The ~~alleged~~trustee seeks a declaration that the ~~company~~Company has violated ~~certain~~the ~~covenants~~terms of the Indenture, an injunction against ~~and~~ the ~~has~~transfer ~~commenced~~of ~~litigation~~additional ~~and~~assets ~~also~~out ~~issued~~of athe ~~notice~~ordinary course of ~~default~~business, ~~alleging~~damages ~~issues~~and the imposition of a constructive trust on ~~already~~ the ~~covered~~assets intransferred by the Company to its ~~complaint~~affiliates. asIn ~~described~~January in2004, ~~Note~~the 6.plaintiff’s motion to schedule a preliminary

8~~. Management Agreement~~

~~Effective~~ INLAND ~~September~~FIBER 1GROUP, ~~2003, the~~LLC ~~Company~~AND ~~entered~~SUBSIDIARY ~~into a new management agreement with the Manager. The management~~ ~~agreement~~ Notes ~~replaced~~to ~~the~~Condensed ~~prior~~Consolidated ~~arrangement~~Financial ~~under~~Statements ~~which the Company reimbursed~~(concluded) the Manager for expenses incurred on the Company's behalf. The management agreement provides for an annual fee of 2% of the agreed upon valuation of total timber and timberland assets under management, payable monthly. (In ~~addition~~thousands, ~~the~~ ~~Company~~except ~~established~~as ~~its~~otherwise ~~own Board of Directors to supervise the management~~indicated) ~~of the Company.~~

injunction hearing with respect to further transfers to affiliates and for expedited discovery was denied. In connection with the denial of the plaintiff’s motion, the Company agreed that, through the earlier of December 31, 2004 and the resolution of the lawsuit, it would provide at least thirty days’ notice before entering into any transfer of assets to affiliates, other than payment of management fees. Discovery began in January 2004 and is ongoing. On February 6, 2004, the Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. On March 26, 2004 a motion to stay discovery pending the outcome of the Defendant’s motion to dismiss was denied. In May 2004, a hearing was held with respect to defendants’ motion to dismiss. The defendants expect a decision regarding their motion to dismiss within a few months. On May 17, 2004, the Company received a Notice of Default from the Trustee covering certain of the allegations in the complaint. On July 29, 2004, the Court of Chancery dismissed the action without prejudice, based on its determination that the trustee under the Indenture lacked standing under the terms of the Indenture to bring an action against the Defendants because the requisite notice of default and opportunity to cure had not been provided to the Company prior to the time the action was commenced. The trustee was granted 30 days to file an amended complaint. The Company and its legal counsel believe the litigation and the Notice of Default to be without merit and intend to vigorously defend the litigation that would arise if the trustee files an amended complaint. 6. Long Term Debt The Company’s long term debt consists of $225,000 of 9-5/8 % Senior Notes (the “Notes”) due 2007, which were issued jointly and severally by the Company and Fiber Finance Corp., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (collectively, the “Issuers”). The Issuers serve as co-obligors of the Notes. The Notes represent unsecured general obligations of the Issuers and bear interest at 9-5/8% payable semiannually in arrears on May 15 and November 15, and mature on November 15, 2007 unless previously redeemed. The Notes are redeemable at the option of the Issuers in whole or in part at predetermined redemption prices plus accrued interest to the redemption date. The Notes contain certain restrictive covenants, including limiting the ability of the Company and its subsidiaries to make cash distributions, incur additional indebtedness, sell assets or harvest timber in excess of certain limitations. Under certain restrictive covenants, during 2003 and 2002, the Company was and presently is prohibited from making distributions to its members. Although the Company believes it was and is in compliance with the covenants contained in the Notes, the trustee under the indenture has alleged that the company has violated certain covenants and has commenced litigation and also issued a notice of default, alleging issues already covered in its complaint as described in Note 5. On July 29, 2004, the Court of Chancery dismissed the action without prejudice, based on its determination that the trustee under the Indenture lacked standing under the terms of the Indenture to bring an action against the Defendants because the requisite notice of default and opportunity to cure had not been provided to the Company prior to the time the action was commenced. The trustee was granted 30 days to file an amended complaint. The Company and its legal counsel believe the litigation and the Notice of Default to be without merit and intend to vigorously defend the litigation that would arise if the trustee files an amended complaint.

~~INLAND~~7. Management Agreement ~~FIBER~~ Effective ~~GROUP~~September 1, ~~LLC~~2003, the Company entered into a new management agreement with the Manager. The management agreement replaced ~~(formerly~~ the Uprior arrangement under which the Company reimbursed the Manager for expenses incurred on the Company’s behalf.S. ~~Timberlands~~The ~~Klamath~~management agreement ~~Falls~~provides for an annual fee of 2% of the agreed upon valuation of total timber and timberland assets under management, payable ~~LLC)~~monthly. In addition, the Company established its own Board of Directors to supervise the management of the Company

~~ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF~~9 ~~FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS~~

~~Forward-Looking~~ INLAND ~~Statements~~FIBER GROUP, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Forward-Looking Statements Certain information contained in this report may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the federal securities laws. Although the Company believes that expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions, it can give no assurance that its expectations will be achieved. Forward-looking information is subject to certain risks, trends and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected. Such risks, trends and uncertainties ~~include~~ include the highly cyclical nature of the forest products industry, general economic conditions, competition, price conditions or trends for the Company'’s products, the possibility that timber supply could increase if governmental, environmental or endangered species policies change, and limitations on the Company'’s ability to harvest its timber due to adverse natural conditions or increased governmental restrictions. These and other risks are described in the Company'’s other reports and registration statements, which are available from the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

In June 2003, a major customer and competitor of the Company, Crown Pacific, filed for relief under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. ~~There~~ There was no direct financial impact to the Company. It is not known at this time how this bankruptcy will impact the forest products industry in which the Company operates although it may lead to increased timber supply in the market.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

Certain accounting policies have a significant impact on amounts reported in the financial statements. A summary of those significant accounting policies can be found in Note 1 to the Company'’s financial statements included in the Company'’s 2003 Annual Report on Form 10-K. The Company has not adopted any significant new accounting policies during the ~~three~~six months ended ~~March~~ 31June 30, 2004.

Among the significant judgments made by management in the preparation of the Company'’s financial statements are the determination of the allowance for doubtful accounts and the rates of depletion applicable to the Company'’s merchantable timber. These determinations are made periodically in the ordinary course of accounting.

Overview

The Company'’s principal operations consist of growing and harvesting timber and selling logs, standing timber and related by-products to third party wood processors and related party purchasers as well as the sale of excess timberland. These logs and by-products are processed for sale as lumber, molding products, doors, mill work, commodity, specialty and overlaid plywood products, laminated veneer lumber, engineered wood I-beams, particleboard, hardboard, paper and other wood products. These products are used in residential, ~~commercial~~ commercial and industrial construction, home remodeling and repair, general industrial applications and a variety of paper products. The results of the Company's operations and its ability to pay distributions to its members depend upon a number of factors, many of which are beyond its control. These factors include general economic and industry conditions, domestic and export prices, supply and demand for timber logs, seasonality, government regulations affecting the manner in which timber may be harvested, and competition from other supplying regions and substitute products. The Company is currently not permitted to make any distributions to members (see Financial Condition and Liquidity).

9 10

INLAND FIBER GROUP, LLC ~~(formerly~~AND ~~U.S.~~SUBSIDIARY ~~Timberlands Klamath Falls, LLC)~~

~~Seasonality~~variety of paper products. The results of the Company’s operations and its ability to pay distributions to its members depend upon a number of factors, many of which are beyond its control. These factors include general economic and industry conditions, domestic and export prices, supply and demand for timber logs, seasonality, government regulations affecting the manner in which timber may be harvested, and competition from other supplying regions and substitute products. The Company is currently not permitted to make any distributions to members (see Financial Condition and Liquidity).

The Company's log and standing timber sales volumes are generally at their lowest levels in the first and second quarters of each year. In the first quarter, heavy snowfalls in higher elevations prevent access to many areas of the Company's timberlands. This limited access, along with spring break-up conditions (when warming weather thaws and softens roadbeds) in March or April, restricts logging operations to lower elevations and areas with rockier soil types. As a result of these constraints, the Company's sales volumes are typically at their lowest in the first quarter, improving in the second quarter and at their highest during the third and fourth quarters. Most customers in the region react to this seasonality by carrying sufficiently high log inventories at the end of the calendar year to carry them to the second quarter of the following year. Seasonality

~~Current~~The ~~Market~~Company’s ~~Conditions~~log and standing timber sales volumes are generally at their lowest levels in the first and second quarters of each year. In the first quarter, heavy snowfalls in higher elevations prevent access to many areas of the Company’s timberlands. This limited access, along with spring break-up conditions (when warming weather thaws and softens roadbeds) in March or April, restricts logging operations to lower elevations and areas with rockier soil types. As a result of these constraints, the Company’s sales volumes are typically at their lowest in the first quarter, improving in the second quarter and at their highest during the third and fourth quarters. Most customers in the region react to this seasonality by carrying sufficiently high log inventories at the end of the calendar year to carry them to the second quarter of the following year.

~~First~~Current Market Conditions Second quarter 2004 prices for finished wood products (e.g. lumber, plywood and engineered wood products) were higher than the ~~fourth~~first quarter 2004. Plywood prices leveled off during the quarter ~~2003~~ but remained high. ~~Prices~~Lumber prices continued to rise ~~during~~slightly with industrial pine prices out-pacing other lumber products. Delivered log prices for Douglas Fir remained flat in the second quarter ~~for~~due ~~both~~to ~~panels~~a ~~and~~long ~~lumber~~term delivered log agreement. Prices for ~~products~~ veneer logs improved, as did Ponderosa Pine saw log prices. Incense Cedar prices are off from first quarter prices.

~~Delivered log prices for Douglas Fir remained flat during~~11 the first quarter 2004 due to a long term delivered log agreement. Prices for veneer logs improved, as did Ponderosa Pine saw log prices. Incense Cedar prices remained flat and did not change from fourth quarter 2003 prices.

~~Results~~ INLAND ofFIBER ~~Operations~~GROUP, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY

10Results of Operations

~~INLAND FIBER~~ ~~GROUP,~~Selected ~~LLC~~operating ~~(formerly~~statistics ~~U.S.~~for ~~Timberlands~~the ~~Klamath Falls, LLC)~~Company:

Quarter Ended March 31, 2004 Compared to Quarter Ended March 31, 2003


	SalesVolume (MBF)				Price Realization (MBF)

			Timber						Timber
Period	Logs	Stumpage	Deeds		Logs	Stumpage			Deeds

2004
Three Months Ended June 30	8,775	—	26,915	$	318	$	—	$	102
Three Months Ended March 31	6,932	—	1,249	$	317	$	—	$	158


2003
Three Months Ended June 30	14,314	—	10,869	$	320	$	—	$	136
Three Months Ended March 31	17,098	—	2,886	$	313	$	—	$	236

~~Revenues~~Quarter Ended June 30, 2004 Compared to Quarter Ended June 30, 2003

Revenues for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 were $2.6 million, a decrease of $4.2 million or 62% from revenues of $6.8 million for the same period in 2003. The decrease in revenues during the first quarter of 2004 was caused by lower log sales volume and lower timber deed sales which were a direct result of weather related slowdowns.

~~Timber~~ ~~deed~~Revenues ~~sales~~ for the ~~first~~ quarter ofended June 30, 2004 were $016.2 5 million, onan ~~volume~~increase of $1.28 million ~~board~~or ~~feet~~12% ~~("MMBF"),~~from arevenues ~~decrease~~ of $014.57 million as for ~~compared to~~ the same period in 2003~~, when timber deed sales were $0~~.7 ~~million on 2.9 MMBF.~~ The ~~average~~increase ~~timber~~in ~~deed~~revenues ~~price was $158 per thousand board feet ("MBF")~~ during the ~~first~~second quarter of 2004, aswas ~~compared~~caused toby ~~$236~~higher ~~per~~sales ~~MBF~~of ~~for~~timber ~~the~~deeds, ~~same~~ timberlands, ~~period~~and inby-product, ~~2003.~~offset by lower log sales.

~~Log~~ Timber deed sales for the second quarter ~~ended~~of ~~March 31,~~ 2004 were $2.2 8 million on volume of 626.9 million board feet (“MMBF”), aan ~~decrease~~ increase of $3.1.3 million as compared to the same period in 2003, when ~~log~~timber deed sales were $51.35 million on 1710.19 MMBF. The average timber ~~sales~~ deed price was $~~317~~102 per thousand board feet (“MBF”) ~~for~~during the ~~first~~second quarter of 2004, as compared to ~~an average~~ $~~313~~136 per MBF for the same period in 2003. ~~The increase in log prices reflects a general increase in the market.~~

In ~~addition,~~Log ~~property~~ sales for the ~~2004~~quarter ~~first~~ended ~~quarter~~ June 30, 2004 were $02.08 million on volume of 8.8 MMBF, a decrease of $1.8 million as compared to the same period in 2003 when log sales were $04.6 million on 14.3 MMBF. The average sales price was $318 per MBF for the second quarter of 2004, as compared to an average $320 per MBF for the same period in 2003.

~~Gross~~ ~~Profit~~In addition, property sales for the 2004 second quarter were $9.8 million, as compared to $8.3 million for the same period in 2003.

Gross The Company had a gross loss of $0.2 million in the first quarter of 2004 as compared to a gross profit of $0.0 million for the same period in 2003. As a percentage of sales, the gross loss was 7% as compared to a gross profit percentage of 0% in the first quarter of 2003. The gross profit (loss) percentage in 2004 was adversely impacted compared to 2003 by higher contracted log and haul costs on a per MBF basis. Profit

~~Selling~~The Company had a gross loss of $1.2 million in the second quarter of 2004 as compared to a gross loss of $0.5 million for the same period in 2003. As a percentage of sales, ~~General~~the gross loss was 7% as compared to a gross loss percentage of 3% in the second quarter of 2003. The gross loss percentage in 2004 was adversely impacted compared to 2003 by higher timberland sales costs and ~~Administrative~~higher ~~Expenses~~timber deed depletion costs.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $0.5 million from $1.7 million in the first quarter of 2003 to $2.2 million in the first quarter of 2004. The increase was attributable to increased management company fees offset by overall lower costs. 12

INLAND ~~Equity~~FIBER inGROUP, ~~Net~~LLC ~~Loss~~AND ofSUBSIDIARY ~~Affiliate~~

~~Equity~~Selling, inGeneral ~~net~~and ~~loss~~Administrative of affiliate was $4.9 million for the first quarter of 2004. This amount reflects the Company's share of the net loss of an affiliate (AFR) accounted for under the equity method. This compares to equity in net loss of affiliate of $2.9 million in the first quarter of 2003. Expenses

11 Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $0.6 million from $1.4 million in the second quarter of 2003 to $2.0 million in the second quarter of 2004. The increase was attributable to increased management company fees of $1.0 million and increased legal fees of $0.7 million offset by overall lower costs.

~~INLAND FIBER~~Equity ~~GROUP,~~in ~~LLC~~Net ~~(formerly~~Loss ~~U.S.~~of ~~Timberlands Klamath Falls, LLC)~~Affiliate

~~Financial~~ ~~Condition~~Equity ~~and~~in ~~Liquidity~~net loss of affiliate was $4.4 million for the second quarter of 2004. This amount reflects the Company’s share of the net loss of an affiliate (AFR) accounted for under the equity method. This compares to equity in net loss of affiliate of $4.9 million in the second quarter of 2003.

~~Operating~~ Six ~~Activities~~Months Ended June 30, 2004 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2003

Cash flows used in operating activities during the three months ended March 31, 2004 were $1.2 million, as compared to cash provided by operating activities of $1.1 million during the same period in 2003. The $2.3 million decrease is primarily due to the Company's decrease in sales revenue in comparison to the same period in 2003. Revenues

~~Investing~~Revenues ~~Activities~~for the six months ended June 30, 2004 were $19.1 million, a decrease of $2.5 million or 12% from revenues of $21.6 million for the same period in 2003. The decrease in revenues during the first half of 2004 was caused by lower log sales offset by increased sales of timber deeds, timberlands, and by-product.

~~Cash~~Timber ~~flows~~deed ~~used~~sales infor ~~investing~~the ~~activities~~first half of 2004 were $3.0 million on volume of 28.12 MMBF, a decrease of $0.8 million as compared to the ~~during~~ same period in 2003, when timber deed sales were $2.2 million on 13.8 MMBF. The average timber deed price was $105 per MBF during the first ~~three~~half ~~months~~ of 2004, ~~and~~as compared to $157 per MBF for the same period in 2003.

~~Financing~~ ~~Activities~~Log sales for the six months ended June 30, 2004 were $5.0 million on volume of 15.7 MMBF, a decrease of $4.9 million as compared to the same period in 2003 when log sales were $9.9 million on 31.4 MMBF. The average sales price was $317 per MBF for the first half of 2004, as compared to an average $316 per MBF for the same period in 2003. The increase in log prices reflects a general increase in the market.

~~The~~ ~~Company~~In ~~had~~addition, aproperty ~~credit~~sales ~~agreement~~for ~~with an affiliate of~~ the ~~Managing~~2004 ~~Member~~first ~~(the~~half ~~"Affiliate~~were ~~Credit Facility"), which allowed the Company to borrow up to~~ $129.09 million~~. The Credit Facility expired~~, byas ~~its~~compared ~~terms, on April 30, 2002. While the Company continues~~ to ~~seek a credit facility from an unaffiliated source, affiliated lenders have made short-term advances to the Company, payable on demand to the affiliates, at an annual interest rate of 10%~~$8.9 ~~The~~million ~~affiliate~~for ~~has made no commitment to continue lending funds to~~ the ~~Company, and~~same ~~each~~period ~~request~~in ~~is reviewed on a case-by-case basis~~2003.

~~The~~Gross agreement governing the Company's 9-5/8% Senior Notes due 2007 (the "Notes") contains restrictive covenants, including limitations on harvest levels, land sales, cash distributions and the amount of future indebtedness. Under the Notes, the Company's average annual adjusted harvest volume over any period of four consecutive years cannot exceed a volume of approximately 147 MMBF as adjusted for timberland sales and purchases. The Notes also limit one-year harvest levels and average annual harvest levels for consecutive two-and-three year periods. As of March 31, 2004, the Company was in compliance with the covenants contained in the Notes. As of March 31, 2004, the Company was not permitted to make any distributions, as it had not exceeded the requisite Consolidated Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio within the Restricted Payments provisions of the Notes. Profit

~~Through~~ The Company had a gross loss of $1.4 million in the first ~~three~~half ~~months~~ of 2004 as compared to a gross loss of $0.5 million for the same period in 2003. As a percentage of sales, the ~~Company~~gross ~~funded~~loss was 7% as compared to a gross loss percentage of 2% in the first half of 2003. ~~its~~ The ~~investing~~gross ~~activities~~loss ~~and~~percentage ~~met~~in ~~its~~2004 ~~cash~~was ~~requirements~~adversely ~~for~~impacted ~~debt~~compared ~~service~~to ~~from~~2003 by higher timber deed, timberland sales, and by-product ~~operations~~ costs, offset by lower logging and ~~cash~~logging ondepletion ~~hand~~costs.

Cash required to meet the Company's debt service will be significant. To meet its working capital requirements, the Company for the past several years has been selling logs and making timber sales at a rate in excess of the Manager's estimate of the current annual board footage growth on the Company's timberlands. The debt service and, prior to April 2001, quarterly cash distributions have been funded from operations and borrowings. Given projected volumes for sales of logs and timber, estimated current board footage growth on the timberlands and the harvest restrictions in the Notes, unless prices improve, costs are reduced, new markets are developed or the Company makes accretive acquisitions, the Company's ability in the future to make distributions will be adversely affected. On May 10, 2001 the Company announced an indefinite suspension of distributions. The Company continues to evaluate means to improve cash flows, including the factors mentioned above. There can be no assurance that prices will improve or that the Company will be able to take any of these actions and it is unlikely prices will improve or any of these actions will take effect within a short-term horizon. The Company will continue to look to log and timber deed sales as well as the sale of excess timberlands, and short-term advances from an affiliated lender, to meet its short-term cash needs.13

12 INLAND FIBER GROUP, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY

~~INLAND FIBER~~ ~~GROUP~~Selling, ~~LLC~~General ~~(formerly~~and ~~U.S.~~Administrative ~~Timberlands Klamath Falls, LLC)~~Expenses

On ~~December 19~~Selling, ~~2003,~~general ~~an action was brought in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in~~ and ~~for~~administrative ~~New~~expenses ~~Castle~~increased ~~County~~ by the trustee under the Indenture against the Company, Finance Corp., the Manager, American Forest Resources, LLC, Cascade Resource Holdings Group, LLC, and all of the directors of the Manager as of January $1~~, 2003 (collectively, the "Defendants")~~. ~~The~~2 ~~complaint~~million ~~alleges~~from that the Company violated the provisions of the Indenture by transferring certain assets to its affiliates, the directors of the Company violated their fiduciary duty to the Company and that the transfers of the assets were fraudulent conveyances and subject to rescission$3.0 ~~The~~million ~~trustee~~in ~~seeks a declaration that~~ the ~~Company~~first ~~has~~half ~~violated the terms~~ of ~~the~~2003 Indenture, an injunction against the transfer of additional assets out of the ordinary course of business, damages and the imposition of a constructive trust on the assets transferred by the Company to ~~its affiliates~~$4.2 ~~In January 2004, the plaintiff's motion to schedule~~million a preliminary injunction hearing with respect to further transfers to affiliates and for expedited discovery was denied. In connection with the denial of the plaintiff's motion, the Company agreed that, through the earlier of December 31, 2004 and the resolution of the lawsuit, it would provide at least thirty days' notice before entering into any transfer of assets to affiliates, other than payment of management fees. Discovery began in ~~January 2004 and is ongoing. On February 6, 2004,~~ the ~~Defendants~~first ~~filed~~half ~~a motion to dismiss. On March 26, 2004 a motion to stay discovery pending the outcome~~ of ~~the Defendant's motion to dismiss was denied. In May~~ 2004~~, a hearing was held with respect to defendants' motion to dismiss~~. The ~~defendants expect~~increase awas ~~decision~~attributable ~~regarding their motion~~ to ~~dismiss~~increased ~~within~~management acompany ~~few~~fees ~~months. On May 17, 2004, the Company received a Notice~~ of ~~Default from the Trustee covering certain of the allegations in the complaint~~$2.0 ~~The~~million ~~Company~~ and ~~its~~increased legal ~~counsel~~ ~~believe~~ fees ~~the litigation, as well as the Notice~~ of ~~Default,~~$1.0 tomillion beoffset ~~without~~by ~~merit and~~overall ~~the~~lower ~~Company intends to vigorously defend itself in the lawsuit~~costs.

~~ITEM~~Equity 4.in ~~CONTROLS~~Net ~~AND~~Loss ~~PROCEDURES~~of Affiliate

~~The~~Equity ~~Company's~~in ~~management~~net ~~maintains~~loss ~~an adequate system~~ of ~~disclosure~~ ~~controls~~affiliate ~~and~~was ~~procedures~~$9.3 tomillion ~~promote~~for the ~~timely~~first ~~identification~~half ~~and reporting~~ of ~~material,~~2004. ~~relevant~~This ~~information.~~amount ~~The~~reflects the Company'’s ~~President~~share ~~and Chief Executive Officer and its Vice President and Chief Financial Officer meet regularly with members~~ of ~~senior management of~~ the ~~Manager to discuss significant transactions~~ ~~and~~ net ~~events~~loss ~~affecting~~of ~~the~~an ~~Company's~~affiliate ~~operations~~(AFR) ~~and~~accounted ~~consider~~for ~~whether topics discussed represent information that should be disclosed~~ under the ~~rules~~equity ~~of the SEC~~method. ~~The Company~~This ~~established~~compares ato ~~Board~~equity ~~of Directors~~ in ~~July~~net ~~2003~~loss ~~and~~of itaffiliate ~~includes~~of ~~an Audit Committee~~$7.8 ~~The Audit Committee reviews all reports on Form 10-Q and 10-K prior~~million to in ~~their filing. The Audit Committee is responsible for hiring~~ the ~~Company's external~~first ~~auditors~~half ~~and~~of ~~meets with those auditors~~2003.

~~The Company's President and Chief Executive Officer and~~ ~~its Vice President and Chief~~ Financial ~~Officer~~Condition ~~are responsible for establishing~~ and ~~maintaining disclosure controls and procedures. They have designed such controls to ensure that others make all material information known to them within the organization.~~ Liquidity

13Operating Activities

~~INLAND FIBER~~ ~~GROUP~~Cash flows used in operating activities during the six months ended June 30, ~~LLC~~2004 were $0.2 million, as compared to cash provided ~~(formerly~~ by Uoperating activities of $0.S6 million during the same period in 2003. ~~Timberlands~~The ~~Klamath~~$0.8 ~~Falls,~~million ~~LLC)~~decrease is primarily due to the Company’s decrease in sales revenue in comparison to the same period in 2003.

AsInvesting of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, the Company's principal executive officer and principal financial officer completed an evaluation of the disclosure controls and procedures and has determined them to be functioning properly and effectively. They did not discover any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses within the controls and procedures that required modifications. Since the completion of that evaluation, there have been no significant changes in internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect internal control over financial reporting. Activities

~~PART~~ IICash flows used in investing activities were $0.7 ~~OTHER~~million ~~INFORMATION~~during the first six months of 2004 and $1.6 million during the first six months of 2003.

~~ITEM~~Financing ~~1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS~~Activities

On ~~June~~The 21agreement governing the Company’s 9-5/8% Senior Notes due 2007 (the “Notes”) contains restrictive covenants, including ~~2002~~limitations on harvest levels, land sales, cash distributions and the ~~Company~~amount ~~was~~of ~~notified~~future ~~that~~indebtedness. itUnder ~~was~~the Notes, ~~named~~ the inCompany’s aaverage ~~lawsuit~~annual ~~filed~~adjusted inharvest ~~State~~volume ~~Court~~over inany ~~Oregon~~period asof four consecutive years cannot exceed a ~~codefendant~~volume ~~seeking~~of ~~medical~~approximately ~~expenses~~ 147 ~~and~~MMBF upas toadjusted ~~$12~~for timberland sales and purchases.0 ~~million~~The inNotes ~~damages~~also ~~for~~limit ~~injuries~~one-year ~~sustained~~harvest bylevels ~~the~~and ~~minor~~average annual harvest ~~child~~ levels offor anconsecutive ~~employee~~two-and-three year periods. As of ~~the~~June ~~Manager~~30, ~~while~~2004, ~~riding~~the onCompany ~~equipment~~was ~~owned~~in bycompliance with the ~~Manager.~~covenants contained At in the ~~time,~~Notes. ~~liability~~As ~~insurance~~of ~~was~~June ~~in place~~30, ~~however~~2004, the ~~insurance~~Company ~~underwriter has~~was ~~since~~not ~~gone~~permitted ~~bankrupt~~to ~~and~~make ~~coverage~~any isdistributions, ~~limited~~as ~~and~~it ishad ~~being~~not ~~administered~~exceeded by the ~~Oregon~~requisite Consolidated ~~Guarantee~~Fixed ~~Insurance~~Charge ~~Association.~~Coverage ~~Effective~~Ratio ~~April~~within 5,the ~~2004~~Restricted ~~this~~Payments ~~case was~~provisions ~~dismissed~~of ~~with~~the ~~prejudice~~Notes.

On ~~December~~Through ~~19, 2003, an action was brought in~~ the ~~Court of~~first ~~Chancery~~six ofmonths ~~the State~~ of ~~Delaware in and for New Castle County by the trustee under the Indenture against the Company~~2004, ~~Finance Corp.,~~ the Manager, American Forest Resources, LLC, Cascade Resource Holdings Group, LLC, and all of the directors of the Manager as of January 1, 2003 (collectively, the "Defendants"). The complaint alleges that the Company ~~violated~~funded ~~the provisions of the Indenture by transferring certain assets to~~ its ~~affiliates,~~investing ~~the~~activities ~~directors of the Company violated their fiduciary duty to the Company~~ and ~~that~~met the transfers of the assets were fraudulent conveyances and subject to rescission. The trustee seeks a declaration that the Company has violated the terms of the Indenture, an injunction against the transfer of additional assets out of the ordinary course of business, damages and the imposition of a constructive trust on the assets transferred by the Company to its ~~affiliates.~~cash Inrequirements ~~January 2004, the plaintiff's motion to schedule a preliminary injunction hearing with respect to further transfers to affiliates and~~ for ~~expedited~~debt ~~discovery~~service was denied. In connection with the denial of the plaintiff's motion, the Company agreed that, through the earlier of December 31, 2004 and the resolution of the lawsuit, it would provide at least thirty days' notice before entering into any transfer of assets to affiliates, other than payment of management fees. Discovery began in January 2004 and is ongoing. On February 6, 2004, the Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. In May 2004, a hearing was held with respect to defendants' motion to dismiss. The defendants expect a decision regarding their motion to dismiss within a few months. On March 26, 2004 a motion to stay discovery pending the outcome of the Defendant's motion to dismiss was denied. On May 17, 2004, the Company received a Notice of Default from ~~the Trustee covering certain of the allegations in the complaint.~~ ~~The~~ operations ~~Company~~ and ~~its~~cash ~~legal~~on ~~counsel believe the litigation, as well as the Notice of Default to be without merit and the Company intends to vigorously defend itself in the lawsuit~~hand.

14 Cash required to meet the Company’s debt service will be significant. To meet its working capital requirements, the Company for the past several years has been selling logs and making timber sales at a rate in excess of the Manager’s estimate of the current annual board footage growth on the Company’s timberlands. The debt service and, prior to April 2001, quarterly cash

~~INLAND~~14 ~~FIBER GROUP, LLC (formerly U.S. Timberlands Klamath Falls, LLC)~~

~~ITEM~~distributions 3have been funded from operations and borrowings. ~~DEFAULTS~~Given ~~UPON~~projected ~~SENIOR~~volumes ~~SECURITIES~~for sales of logs and timber, estimated current board footage growth on the timberlands and the harvest restrictions in the Notes, unless prices improve, costs are reduced, new markets are developed or the Company makes accretive acquisitions, the Company’s ability in the future to make distributions will be adversely affected. On May 10, 2001 the Company announced an indefinite suspension of distributions. The Company continues to evaluate means to improve cash flows, including the factors mentioned above. There can be no assurance that prices will improve or that the Company will be able to take any of these actions and it is unlikely prices will improve or any of these actions will take effect within a short-term horizon. The Company will continue to look to log and timber deed sales as well as the sale of excess timberlands, and short-term advances from an affiliated lender, to meet its short-term cash needs and meet debt service. On December 19, 2003, an action was brought in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County by the trustee under the Indenture against the Company, Finance Corp., the Manager, American Forest Resources, LLC, Cascade Resource Holdings Group, LLC, and all of the directors of the Manager as of January 1, 2003 (collectively, the “Defendants”). The complaint alleges that the Company violated the provisions of the Indenture by transferring certain assets to its affiliates, the directors of the Company violated their fiduciary duty to the Company and that the transfers of the assets were fraudulent conveyances and subject to rescission. The trustee seeks a declaration that the Company has violated the terms of the Indenture, an injunction against the transfer of additional assets out of the ordinary course of business, damages and the imposition of a constructive trust on the assets transferred by the Company to its affiliates. In January 2004, the plaintiff’s motion to schedule a preliminary injunction hearing with respect to further transfers to affiliates and for expedited discovery was denied. In connection with the denial of the plaintiff’s motion, the Company agreed that, through the earlier of December 31, 2004 and the resolution of the lawsuit, it would provide at least thirty days’ notice before entering into any transfer of assets to affiliates, other than payment of management fees. Discovery began in January 2004 and is ongoing. On February 6, 2004, the Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. On March 26, 2004 a motion to stay discovery pending the outcome of the Defendant’s motion to dismiss was denied. In May 2004, a hearing was held with respect to defendants’ motion to dismiss. On May 17, 2004, the Company received a Notice of Default from the Trustee covering certain of the allegations in the complaint. On July 29, 2004, the Court of Chancery dismissed the action without prejudice, based on its determination that the trustee under the Indenture lacked standing under the terms of the Indenture to bring an action against the Defendants because the requisite notice of default and opportunity to cure had not been provided to the Company at the time the action was commenced. The trustee was granted 30 days to file an amended complaint. The Company and its legal counsel believe the litigation and the Notice of Default to be without merit and intend to vigorously defend the litigation that would arise if the trustee files an amended complaint which properly alleges standing.

~~As noted above in Part II, Item 1, the trustee under the~~15 Indenture has alleged that the Company is in default under the Indenture as a result of its violation of certain provisions of the Notes. The Company denies the allegations and believes it is in compliance with the covenants under the Indenture in all material respects.

~~ITEMS~~ITEM 2, 4,. CONTROLS AND ~~5 OF PART II~~PROCEDURES

~~Are~~ ~~not~~The ~~applicable~~Company’s management maintains an adequate system of disclosure controls and ~~have~~procedures ~~been~~to ~~omitted~~promote the timely identification and reporting of material, relevant information. The Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and its Vice President and Chief Financial Officer meet regularly with members of senior management of the Manager to discuss significant transactions and events affecting the Company’s operations and consider whether topics discussed represent information that should be disclosed under the rules of the SEC. The Company established a Board of Directors in July 2003 and it includes an Audit Committee. The Audit Committee reviews all reports on Form 10-Q and 10-K prior to their filing. The Audit Committee is responsible for hiring the Company’s external auditors and meets with those auditors.

15 The Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and its Vice President and Chief Financial Officer are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures. They have designed such controls to ensure that others make all material information known to them within the organization. As of the end of the period covered by this quarterly report, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer completed an evaluation of the disclosure controls and procedures and has determined them to be functioning properly and effectively. They did not discover any significant deficiencies or material weaknesses within the controls and procedures that required modifications. Since the completion of that evaluation, there have been no significant changes in internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that could significantly affect internal control over financial reporting.

~~INLAND~~ ~~FIBER~~ PART ~~GROUP, LLC (formerly U~~II.S. ~~Timberlands~~OTHER ~~Klamath Falls, LLC)~~INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On June 21, 2002, the Company was notified that it was named in a lawsuit filed in State Court in Oregon as a codefendant seeking medical expenses and up to $12.0 million in damages for injuries sustained by the minor child of an employee of the Manager while riding on equipment owned by the Manager. At the time, liability insurance was in place, however, the insurance underwriter has since gone bankrupt and coverage is limited and is being administered by the Oregon Guarantee Insurance Association. Effective April 5, 2004 this case was dismissed with prejudice.

On December 19, 2003, an action was brought in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware in and for New Castle County by the trustee under the Indenture against the Company, Finance Corp., the Manager, American Forest Resources, LLC, Cascade Resource Holdings Group, LLC, and all of the directors of the Manager as of January 1, 2003 (collectively, the “Defendants”). The complaint alleges that the Company violated the provisions of the Indenture by transferring certain assets to its affiliates, the directors of the Company violated their fiduciary duty to the Company and that the transfers of the assets were fraudulent conveyances and subject to rescission. The trustee seeks a declaration that the Company has violated the terms

of the Indenture, an injunction against the transfer of additional assets out of the ordinary course of business, damages and the imposition of a constructive trust on the assets transferred by the Company to its affiliates. In January 2004, the plaintiff’s motion to schedule a preliminary injunction hearing with respect to further transfers to affiliates and for expedited discovery was denied. In connection with the denial of the plaintiff’s motion, the Company agreed that, through the earlier of December 31, 2004 and the resolution of the lawsuit, it would provide at least thirty days’ notice before entering into any transfer of assets to affiliates, other than payment of management fees. Discovery began in January 2004 and is ongoing. On February 6, 2004, the Defendants filed a motion to dismiss. In May 2004, a hearing was held with respect to defendants’ motion to dismiss. On March 26, 2004 a motion to stay discovery pending the outcome of the Defendant’s motion to dismiss was denied. On May 17, 2004, the Company received a Notice of Default from the Trustee covering certain of the allegations in the complaint. On July 29, 2004, the Court of Chancery dismissed the action without prejudice, based on its determination that the trustee under the Indenture lacked standing under the terms of the Indenture to bring an action against the Defendants because the requisite notice of default and opportunity to cure had not been provided to the Company at the time the action was commenced. The trustee was granted 30 days to file an amended complaint. The Company and its legal counsel believe the litigation and the Notice of Default to be without merit and intend to vigorously defend the litigation that would arise if the trustee files an amended complaint.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

As noted above in Part II, Item 1, the trustee under the Indenture has alleged that the Company is in default under the Indenture as a result of its violation of certain provisions of the Notes.

ITEMS 2, 4, AND 5 OF PART II

Are not applicable and have been omitted.

INLAND FIBER GROUP, LLC AND SUBSIDIARY

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K

(a)	Exhibits

	31.1	Certification of CEO Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

	31.2	Certification of CFO Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)

	32.1	Sarbanes-Oxley Certification of CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

	32.2	Sarbanes-Oxley Certification of CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

(b)	Reports on Form 8-K

None.

1618

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

1719

~~May~~August 246, 2004

INLAND FIBER GROUP, LLC

/s/ Thomas C. Ludlow

Thomas C. Ludlow

Vice President and Treasurer

(Principal Financial Officer)

Filing Compare · INLAND FIBER GROUP LLC