UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015

☐ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to _______

Commission File No. 000-52892

Hawker Energy, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Nevada	98-0511130
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

326 S. Pacific Coast Highway, Suite 102 Redondo Beach CA	90277
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (310) 438-7997

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

ý Yes ☐ No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

ý Yes ☐ No (Not required)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ☐	Accelerated filer ☐
Non-accelerated filer ☐	Smaller reporting company ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

☐ Yes ý No

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date:

8283,~~737~~247,306 shares of common stock as of ~~June~~July 119, 2015.

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

FOR THE FISCAL QUARTER ENDED

~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

INDEX TO FORM 10-Q

PART I		Page
Item 1	Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	3
Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	33
Item 3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	44
Item 4	Controls and Procedures	44
PART II
Item 1	Legal Proceedings	4645
Item 1A	Risk Factors	46
Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	46
Item 3	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	46
Item 4	Mine Safety Disclosures	46
Item 5	Other Information	46
Item 6	Exhibits	47
	Signatures	4948

PART I

Item 1

Financial Statements

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

	February 28, 2015			August 31, 2014
	May 31, 2015			August 31, 2014
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash	$	5219,~~815~~391		$	13,207
Accounts receivable		1512,~~855~~279			42,815
Inventory		-			6,092
Prepaid expenses		3055,~~897~~793			22,389
Secured subordinated loan receivable, short term		-			1,298,322
Total current assets		9987,~~567~~463			1,382,825
Fixed assets:
Fixed assets, net of accumulated
depreciation of $31,863 and $19,605, respectively		2,114,174			14,269
depreciation of $61,194 and $19,605, respectively		2,084,843			14,269
Other assets:
Capitalized oil and gas properties, net of accumulated
depletion of $114,323 and $86,193, respectively		11,507,874			730,046
depletion of $164,061 and $86,193, respectively		10,805,646			730,046
Intangible assets and other		~~180~~175,000			5,000
Total assets	$	13,~~901~~152,~~615~~952		$	2,132,140
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY (DEFICIT)
LIABILITIES AND (DEFICIT)
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	2,~~096~~418,~~058~~198		$	813,438
Accrued bonuses		600,000			480,000
Bank loan payable		43,~~022~~661,~~704~~191			-
Loans payable to related parties, short term		~~470~~598,~~429~~956			226,876
Convertible notes payable, short term		54,784			862,450
Short term debt		516,162			862,450
Conversion option		-			122,045
Current portion of long term debt		~~208~~326,~~346~~214			20,065
Total current liabilities		78,~~452~~120,~~321~~721			2,524,874
Long term liabilities:
Long term debt		~~424~~450,~~227~~817			149,039
Conversion option		~~547~~404,~~886~~568			-
Retirement liability		~~984~~1,~~163~~021,515			-
Asset retirement obligations		1,~~921~~932,~~438~~888			168,110
Deferred income taxes		32,~~207~~914,~~000~~254			-
Total long term liabilities		76,~~084~~724,~~714~~042			317,149
Total liabilities		14,~~537~~844,~~035~~763			2,842,023
Stockholders' equity (deficit):
Stockholders' (deficit):
Preferred stock; $0.001 par value; 50,000,000
shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding		-			-
Common stock; $0.001 par value; 750,000,000
shares authorized, 80,130,403 and 41,174,703
shares authorized, 82,737,306 and 41,174,703
shares issued and outstanding, respectively		8082,~~130~~737			41,175
Common stock payable		~~378~~67,~~027~~174			50,000
Additional paid in capital		3,~~900~~879,~~810~~294			1,224,300
Accumulated deficit		(5,~~139~~866,~~387~~016	)		(2,080,358	)
Total stockholders' equity (deficit)		(780,420	)		(764,883	)
Total stockholders' (deficit)		(1,836,811	)		(764,883	)
Non-controlling interest		145,000			55,000
Total equity (deficit)		(635,420	)		(709,883	)
Total (deficit)		(1,691,811	)		(709,883	)
Total liabilities and equity (deficit)	$	13,901,615		$	2,132,140
Total liabilities and (deficit)	$	13,152,952		$	2,132,140

The accompanying unaudited notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)

	For the Three Months Ended						For the ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended
	February 28, 2015			February 28, 2014			February 28, 2015			February 28, 2014
	May 31, 2015			May 31, 2014			May 31, 2015			May 31, 2014
Revenue:
Oil revenues	$	91279,~~029~~174		$	1835,~~348~~755		$	~~101~~380,~~323~~497		$	4479,~~112~~867
Expenses:
Direct operating costs		90283,~~448~~992			819,~~020~~224			~~106~~390,~~444~~436			2040,~~992~~216
Depletion, depreciation and amortization		4090,~~578~~519			712,~~847~~249			51142,~~614~~133			1528,~~957~~206
Professional fees		~~181~~287,~~621~~635			~~121~~320,~~972~~019			~~612~~899,~~184~~819			~~193~~513,~~043~~062
Bonuses		~~240,000~~-			-			240,000			-
General and administrative expenses		99,508			53,665			174,035			59,896
General and administrative		294,183			66,251			468,218			126,147
Equity compensation expense		703,373			-			1,791,552			-
Equity compensation		28,468			14,999			1,820,020			14,999
Total expenses		1984,~~355,528~~797			~~191~~432,~~504~~742			23,~~975~~960,~~829~~626			~~289~~722,~~888~~630
Net operating (loss)		(1705,~~264,499~~623	)		(~~173~~396,~~156~~987	)		(23,~~874~~580,~~506~~129	)		(~~245~~642,~~776~~763	)
Other (income) expense:
Interest (income)		(7,776	)		-			(18,280	)		-
Interest and other (income)		(11,559	)		(827	)		(29,839	)		(827	)
Interest expense		~~136~~240,~~710~~303			34,~~335~~367			~~229~~469,~~663~~966			611,~~748~~115
Change in fair value of conversion option		7(162,~~802~~992	)		-			(26189,~~860~~852	)		-
Total other expense		~~136~~65,~~736~~752			3,~~335~~540			~~184~~250,~~523~~275			610,~~748~~288
Loss before income taxes		(1771,~~401,235~~375	)		(~~176~~400,~~491~~527	)		(3,~~059~~830,~~029~~404	)		(~~252~~653,~~524~~051	)
Provision for income taxes		-			-			-			-
Income tax benefit		44,746			-			44,746			-
Net loss		(1726,~~401,235~~629	)		(~~176~~400,~~491~~527	)		(3,~~059~~785,~~029~~658	)		(~~252~~653,~~524~~051	)
Net loss (income) attributable to non-controlling interest		(9,531	)		-			-			-
Net loss attributable to non-controlling interest		-			-			-			-
Net loss attributable to the Company	$	(1726,~~410,766~~629	)	$	(~~176~~400,~~491~~527	)	$	(3,~~059~~785,~~029~~658	)	$	(~~252~~653,~~524~~051	)
Net loss per common share - basic and diluted	$	(0.0201	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.0405	)	$	(0.0102	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding -
basic and diluted		7782,~~291~~512,~~310~~718			3137,~~376~~874,~~427~~868			6873,~~630~~308,~~474~~739			2428,~~477~~967,~~454~~059

The accompanying unaudited notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

	For the Six Months Ended
	For the Nine Months Ended
	February 28, 2015			February 28, 2014
	May 31, 2015			May 31, 2014
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss before loss attributable to
non-controlling interest	$	(3,~~059~~785,~~029~~658	)	$	(~~252~~653,~~524~~051	)
Depletion, depreciation and amortization		41142,~~844~~133			1128,~~342~~206
Accretion of asset retirement obligation		9,770			4,615
Equity compensation		1,820,020			14,999
Accretion of net profits interest liability		8,086			6,009
Other non-cash expenses		47,151			-
Accretion of discount		119,899			-
Non-cash interest expense		184,601			9,883
Equity compensation expense		1,791,552			-
Change in fair value of conversion option		(189,852	)		-
Change in fair value of conversion option		(26,860	)		-
Deferred income tax benefit		(44,746	)		-
Other		11,472			-
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net
cash (used in) provided by operating activities:
Accounts receivable		2630,~~960~~536			8(3,~~507~~611	)
Inventory		4,636			~~714~~3,033
Prepaid expenses		2(34,~~269~~379	)		110,~~363~~713
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		~~440~~695,~~691~~861			16329,~~134~~205
Accrued bonuses		240,000			-
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities		(388,710	)		(203,840	)
Accrued interest payable		200,950			378
Net cash (used in) operating activities		(688,747	)		(260,245	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Cash acquired in Hawker acquisition		-			6,004
Cash acquired in HERLLC acquisition		-			1,214
Cash acquired in TEG acquisition		23,344			-
Acquisition of an additional working interest in DEEP Lease		-			(~~200~~325,000	)
Purchase of fixed assets		(942,~~253~~371	)		-
Secured subordinated loan receivable		(346,625	)		-(302,306	)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities		(332,534	)		(192,782	)
Net cash (used in) investing activities		(365,652	)		(620,088	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Loans from related parties, short term		233,800			-
Loans from related parties		390,300			180,000
Repayment of loans from related parties, short term		(1050,000	)		-
Net proceeds from unit offering		114,920			434,524
Proceeds from convertible notes		300,000			300,000
Proceeds from unit offering to be closed		-			40,000
Note issuance to Sefton		400,000			-
Payments on net profits interest agreement		(17,868	)		(11,913	)
Bank loan repayment		(400,000	)		-
Proceeds from convertible notes		300,000			-
Proceeds from other debt		258,118			-
Proceeds from long term note		50,000			-
Repayment of other debt		(42,755	)		(19,702	)
Net proceeds from unit offering		114,920			669,901
Proceeds from sale of non-controlling interest		90,000			-
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		760,852			462,611
Net cash provided by financing activities		1,060,583			1,130,199
Net change in cash		396,~~608~~184			65249,~~989~~866
Cash, beginning		13,207			8,298
Cash, end	$	5219,~~815~~391		$	74258,~~287~~164
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	2577,~~229~~866		$	69,~~009~~883
Common stock payable for general and administrative services	$	33,504		$	-
Income taxes paid	$	-		$	-
Convertible notes payable and accrued interest extinguished through rollover into new convertible note payable	$	864,896		$	-
Convertible notes payable and accrued interest
converted to common stock payable	$	324,766		$	-
converted to common stock and warrants	$	324,766		$	-
Units or stock issued to settle accounts payable	$	130,569		$	22,500
Units issued to settle loans from related parties, long term	$	-		$	135,312
Units or stock issued to settle accounts payable	$	136,494		$	31,560
Common stock and warrants issued to pay interest on long term note	$	67,174		$	-
Common stock issued for general and administrative services	$	52,431		$	-
TEG acquisition:
Common stock and warrants issued	$	531,027		$	-
Common stock and warrants subsequently cancelled	$	(430,500	)	$	-
Secured subordinated loan receivable not settled prior to closing	$	1,663,227		$	-
Liabilities assumed	$	10,~~886~~664,~~864~~874		$	-

The accompanying unaudited notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

HAWKER ENERGY, INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF ~~EQUITY~~DEFICIT (Unaudited)

	Common Stock						Common Stock and Warrants Payable						Additional			Accumulated			Non-Controlling		Total ~~Equity~~
	Shares			Amount			Shares			Amount			Paid-in Capital			(Deficit)			Interest		(Deficit)
Balance, August 31, 2013		-		$	-			-		$	-		$	350,000		$	(351,226	)	$	-	$	(1,226	)
Recapitalization on completion of acquisition of SCNRG		25,961,983			25,962			2,000,000			2,000			(26,336	)		-			-		1,626
Issued to acquire Hawker Energy (Rincon), LLC		3,000,000			3,000			-			-			(138,199	)		-			-		(135,199	)
Issuance of common stock payable		2,000,000			2,000			(2,000,000	)		(2,000	)		-			-			-		-
Net proceeds from unit offering		10,212,720			10,213			-			-			970,075			-			-		980,288
Proceeds received for common stock payable		-			-			500,000			50,000			-			-			-		50,000
Stock option compensation		-			-			-			-			68,760			-			-		68,760
Sale of non-controlling interest		-			-			-			-			-			-			55,000		55,000
Net loss attributable to the Company		-			-			-			-			-			(1,729,132	)		-		(1,729,132	)
Balance, August 31, 2014		41,174,703			41,175			500,000			50,000			1,224,300			(2,080,358	)		55,000		(709,883	)
Proceeds received for common stock payable		500,000			500			(500,000	)		(50,000	)		49,500			-			-		-
Issuance of common stock payable		500,000			500			(500,000	)		(50,000	)		49,500			-			-		-
Equity compensation pursuant to HERLLC Option Agreement		33,000,000			33,000			-			-			1,667,590			-			-		1,700,590
Stock option compensation		-			-			-			-			90119,~~961~~430			-			-		90119,~~961~~430
Net proceeds from unit offering		1,150,000			1,150			-			-			113,770			-			-		114,920
Conversion of accounts and bonus payable into units		1,~~305~~364,~~700~~945			1,~~305~~364			-			-			~~129~~135,~~264~~130			-			-		~~130~~136,~~569~~494
Common stock payable for general and administrative services		-			-			500,000			33,504			-			-			-		33,504
Common stock issued for general and adminstrative services		800,000			800			-			-			51,631			-			-		52,431
Issued to acquire TEG		3,000,000			3,000			-			-			528,027			-			-		531,027
Issuance of shares and warrants to acquire TEG		3,000,000			3,000			-			-			528,027			-			-		531,027
Conversion of notes payable		-			-			3,247,658			324,766			-			-			-		324,766
Cancellation of shares and warrants issued to acquire TEG		(1,500,000	)		(1,500	)		-			-			(429,000	)		-			-		(430,500	)
Issuance of shares and warrants on conversion of notes payable		3,247,658			3,248			-			-			321,518			-			-		324,766
Extinguishment of conversion option		-			-			-			-			97,398			-			-		97,398
Interest on note to be paid in shares and warrants		-			-			-510,000			1967,~~757~~174			-			-			-		1967,~~757~~174
Sale of non-controlling interest		-			-			-			-			-			-			90,000		90,000
Net loss attributable to the Company		-			-			-			-			-			(3,~~059~~785,~~029~~658	)		-		(3,~~059~~785,~~029~~658	)
Balance, February 28, 2015		80,130,403		$	80,130			3,747,658		$	378,027		$	3,900,810		$	(5,139,387	)	$	145,000	$	(635,420	)
Balance, May 31, 2015		82,737,306		$	82,737			510,000		$	67,174		$	3,879,294		$	(5,866,016	)	$	145,000	$	(1,691,811	)

The accompanying unaudited notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

UNAUDITED

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Hawker Energy, Inc. (“we”, “our”, “us”, “Hawker” or “the Company”) was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on June 12, 2006, under the name of Uventus Technologies Corp. On September 23, 2009, we merged with our wholly-owned subsidiary and changed our name to Sara Creek Gold Corp. Subsequently, on September 11, 2014, we changed our name to Hawker Energy, Inc.

On October 25, 2013, we closed on the Agreement and Plan of Reorganization with SCNRG, LLC (“SCNRG”), a California limited liability company, whereby we acquired 100% of the membership interest in SCNRG, resulting in SCNRG becoming our wholly-owned subsidiary, in exchange for 14.0 million shares of our common stock issued to the members of SCNRG. For accounting purposes, our acquisition of SCNRG has been accounted for as a reverse acquisition whereby SCNRG is the accounting acquirer effectuating a recapitalization of Hawker. Accordingly, SCNRG is considered the acquirer for accounting purposes and, therefore, the historical financial statements of SCNRG are presented and consolidated with ~~Hawker’s~~ours beginning October 25, 2013. As a result of this transaction, Hawker changed its business direction and is now in the oil and gas industry.

We own interests in oil production properties located in California. Our goal is to acquire and develop mature leases, interests and other rights to oil and gas producing properties with proven undeveloped potential. The accompanying statements of operations and cash flows include the operations of our wholly-owned subsidiaries from the date of acquisition or formation.

2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis Of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with and the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for interim financial information and reporting.

The unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with ~~the~~our ~~Company’s~~ Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the year ended August 31, 2014, which contains ~~the~~our ~~consolidatated~~consolidated financial statements and notes thereto ~~for Hawker~~. ~~The~~Our ~~Company’s~~ fiscal year-end is August 31st.

These consolidated financial statements are unaudited; however, in the opinion of management, they reflect all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the results for the periods reported. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature unless disclosed otherwise. These consolidated financial statements, including notes, have been condensed and do not include all of the information and disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. The interim results for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, are not necessarily indicative of results for the full fiscal year.

There have been no significant changes in ~~the~~our ~~Company’s~~ significant accounting policies for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, as compared to the significant accounting policies described in the Annual Report on Form 10-K, as amended, for the year ended August 31, 2014 and in the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended November 30, 2014, ~~except~~and the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the ~~addition~~three ofmonths ~~the~~ended ~~following:~~February 28, 2015.

Overriding Royalty Interest Liability

Pursuant to an overriding royalty interest granted effective January 2015 to the Secured Convertible Note Payable holder, oil sales from the Tapia oil field are subject to an additional 2.5% or 3.5% overriding royalty interest, depending on the lease. Since this royalty interest was granted in connection with a loan, the loan proceeds were bifurcated and this royalty interest has been accounted for as a separate liability. Each reporting period, the liability’s estimated fair value is remeasured, with the change in fair value being reported in the consolidated statement of operations. Fair value determinations require estimates of future oil prices, reserves, oil sales and appropriate discount rates.

Principles Of Consolidation

~~The~~Our acquisition of SCNRG ~~by Hawker~~ on October 25, 2013, has been accounted for as a reverse acquisition whereby SCNRG is the accounting acquirer effectuating a recapitalization of Hawker. Therefore, our condensed consolidated financial statements include the historic accounts of SCNRG, and consolidated with ~~Hawker’s~~ours beginning October 25, 2013.

On January 1, 2014, we acquired all of the membership interests of Hawker Energy, LLC, which has a wholly-owned subsidiary, Punta Gorda Resources, LLC. Hawker Energy, LLC changed its name to Hawker Energy (Rincon), LLC on October 22, 2014. Our condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of these entities beginning January 1, 2014.

On February 3, 2015, we acquired 100% of the stock of TEG Oil & Gas U.S.A., Inc., (“TEG”), and our condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of this entity from this date (see Note 4).

All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

UNAUDITED

Use Of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates included in the financial statements are: (1) purchase price allocations; (2) depreciation and depletion; (3) accrued assets and liabilities; (4) asset retirement obligations; (5) net profits interest payable; (6) conversion option values; (7) overriding royalty interest liability; and (8) stock-based compensation. Recorded amounts are based on estimates of asset values, oil reserves, asset retirement costs, asset lives and equity values. By their nature, these estimates including the estimates of future prices and costs, and the related future cash flows are subject to measurement uncertainty. The impact in the consolidated financial statements of future periods could be material. Although management believes these estimates are reasonable, changes in facts and circumstances or discovery of new information may result in revised estimates. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

New Accounting Pronouncements

We consider the applicability and impact of all accounting standard updates (ASUs). ASUs not listed below were assessed and determined to be either not applicable or are expected to have minimal impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-9, Revenue From Contracts With Customers, which outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including industry-specific guidance. The ASU is based on the principle that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration which the entity expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for those goods or services. The ASU also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to fulfill a contract. Entities have the option of using either a full retrospective or a modified retrospective approach for the adoption of the new standard. The new guidance is effective for the interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016; early adoption is not permitted. We are currently assessing the impact that this standard will have on our consolidated financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which is intended to define management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an organization’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. Under GAAP, financial statements are prepared based on the presumption that the reporting organization will continue to operate as a going concern, except in limited circumstances. Financial reporting under this presumption is commonly referred to as the going concern basis of accounting. The going concern basis of accounting is critical to financial reporting because it establishes the fundamental basis for measuring and classifying assets and liabilities. Currently, GAAP lacks guidance about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about the organization’s ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related footnote disclosures. This ASU provides guidance to an organization’s management, with principles and definitions that are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and content of disclosures that are commonly provided by organizations today in the financial statement footnotes. The new guidance is effective for the interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016; early adoption is permitted for annual or interim reporting periods for which the financial statements have not previously been issued. ~~The~~We ~~Company~~have ~~has~~ not conducted ~~its~~an analysis to determine whether itwe will adopt the new standard early or not.

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

UNAUDITED

3. GOING CONCERN

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As of ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, wethe Company had cash ~~and equivalents~~ of $5219,~~815~~391, ~~and~~current ~~total~~assets of $87,463, current ~~assets~~liabilities of $998,~~567~~120,721 ~~but~~and a working capital deficit inof $8,033,258. During the ~~amount~~three ofmonth $7period and nine month period ended May 31,~~352~~ 2015,~~754.~~ ~~The~~the Company ~~incurred~~had a net ~~loss~~losses of $1726,~~410,766~~629 and $3,~~059~~785,~~029~~658, ~~for~~respectively. As ~~the~~of ~~three~~May ~~and six months ended February 28~~31, 2015, ~~and~~the Company had an accumulated net loss of $5,~~139~~866,~~387~~016 since the inception of SCNRG in December 2009. The Company has earned insufficient revenues since inception and its cash resources are insufficient to meet its planned business objectives.

These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. These financial statements do not include adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of reported asset amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. The Company’s continuation as a going concern is dependent upon its ability to obtain additional financing or sale of its common stock as may be required and ultimately to attain profitability.

Following the completion of the acquisition of TEG Oil & Gas U.S.A., Inc. oneffective February 31, 2015 (see Note 4), management’s plan is to raise capital through a combination of equity and debt financing sufficient to finance continuing operations for the next twelve months, ~~and~~ to ~~begin~~do ~~further~~high ~~development~~rate of ~~the~~return ~~acquired~~maintenance ~~Tapia~~projects ~~Assets~~and ~~(defined~~continue ~~below)~~with cost cutting initiatives at the Tapia oil field, and to refinance by December 2015 the bank debt assumed with the acquisition. However, there can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in completing such financing.

4. ACQUISITION OF TEG OIL & GAS U.S.A., INC.

On February 3, 2015 (but effective as of February 1, 2015), wethe Company completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding common stock of TEG ~~Oil & Gas U.S.A., Inc. (“TEG”)~~ from Sefton Resources, Inc. (“Sefton”) (the “TEG Acquisition”). The purchase price was $1 plus the issuance of 3,000,000 shares of ~~our~~ common stock and a five-year warrant (“Warrant”) to purchase up to an additional 5,000,000 shares of ~~our~~ common stock for $0.25 per share (the “Warrant”). In addition, between April 2014 and January 2015, ~~Hawker~~the Company and its subsidiary Tapia Holdings, LLC made advances pursuant to a secured subordinated loan agreement to TEG totaling approximately $1.6 million, including accrued interest receivable (Note 5). This amount ~~constitutes~~constituted additional consideration for the TEG Acquisition, as this note receivable was not settled prior to the closing of the TEG Acquisition. As a result of this transaction, TEG became a wholly-owned subsidiary of ~~Hawker. See~~the ~~also Note 18, Subsequent Events~~Company.

~~TEG~~See isNote an6 ~~energy~~for ~~company~~a ~~focused~~March on18, ~~exploitation~~2015 ~~and~~transaction ~~production~~that ofresulted ~~crude oil~~ in ~~Southern~~cancellation ~~California. TEG’s~~of ~~assets~~1,500,000 ~~comprise~~shares ~~four~~of ~~oil~~Hawker and ~~gas~~the ~~leases~~Warrant ~~encompassing~~originally ~~the~~issued ~~Tapia~~to ~~Canyon~~Sefton ~~field~~for (the ~~“Tapia~~purchase ~~Assets”)~~of ~~and~~TEG. As ~~one~~a ~~lease~~result ~~west~~ of the ~~Tapia~~cancellation ~~Canyon~~of ~~field~~shares ~~(the “Eureka Assets”),~~ and the ~~accompanying production equipment. The Tapia Assets located 40 miles north of Los Angeles~~Warrant, ~~California,~~a ~~consist of four oil leases covering 262 gross acres. The Eureka oil field covers an area of approximately 1~~$430,~~510~~500 ~~gross~~reduction ~~acres~~to ~~located 25 miles west of~~ the ~~Tapia~~purchase ~~Canyon~~price ~~oil~~was ~~field in Ventura County, California~~recorded. ~~The acquisition significantly expanded our presence in Southern California.~~

ATEG ~~table~~is ofan ~~adjustments~~energy ~~reflecting~~company ~~the~~focused ~~allocation~~on ofexploitation ~~the~~and ~~fair~~production ~~values is provided below. These adjustments reflect the elimination~~ of ~~the~~crude ~~components~~oil ofin Southern California. TEG’s ~~historical~~assets ~~stockholders’~~comprise ~~equity,~~four ~~the~~oil ~~estimated~~and ~~value~~gas ofleases ~~consideration~~encompassing ~~paid~~the byTapia usCanyon infield (the ~~acquisition~~“Tapia ~~using~~Assets”) ~~the~~and ~~estimated~~one ~~fair~~lease ~~value~~west of ~~common~~the ~~stock~~Tapia onCanyon ~~February~~field ~~3, 2015 and any adjustments to~~ (the ~~historical~~“Eureka ~~book~~Assets”), ~~values of TEG’s assets~~ and ~~liabilities to their estimated fair values, in accordance with acquisition accounting. Transaction costs relating to~~ the ~~TEG Acquisition~~accompanying ~~were~~production ~~expensed as incurred~~equipment. The ~~initial~~Tapia ~~accounting for the TEG Acquisition is preliminary~~Assets, ~~and~~located ~~adjustments~~40 tomiles ~~provisional~~north ~~amounts~~of ~~(such~~Los ~~as fixed assets~~Angeles, ~~oil properties~~California, ~~and~~consist ~~certain liabilities), or recognition~~ of ~~additional~~four ~~assets~~oil ~~acquired~~leases orcovering ~~liabilities~~262 ~~assumed,~~gross ~~may occur as additional information is obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date~~acres. The ~~evaluation~~Eureka ~~of the assigned fair values is ongoing~~Assets, aslocated ~~the~~25 ~~transaction~~miles ~~was~~west ~~recently~~of ~~completed. The Company expects~~ the ~~purchase~~Tapia ~~price~~Canyon ~~allocation~~oil ~~will~~field ~~be finalized~~ in ~~the~~Ventura ~~fourth~~County, ~~fiscal quarter ended August 31~~California, ~~2015. The~~cover ~~Company~~an ~~believes~~area ~~these estimates are reasonable and the significant effects~~ of ~~the~~approximately ~~acquisition~~1,510 ~~are~~gross ~~properly reflected~~acres.

A table of adjustments reflecting the allocation of the fair values is provided below. These adjustments reflect the elimination of the components of TEG’s historical shareholder’s equity, the estimated value of consideration paid by us in the acquisition using the estimated fair value of common stock on February 3, 2015 and any adjustments to the historical book values of TEG’s assets and liabilities to their estimated fair values, in accordance with acquisition accounting. Transaction costs relating to the TEG Acquisition were expensed as incurred. The initial accounting for the TEG Acquisition is preliminary, and adjustments to provisional amounts (such as fixed assets, oil properties, and certain liabilities), or recognition of additional assets acquired or liabilities assumed, may occur as additional information is obtained about facts and circumstances that existed as of the acquisition date. The evaluation of the assigned fair values is ongoing, as the transaction was recently completed. The Company expects the purchase price allocation will be finalized in the fourth fiscal quarter ended August 31, 2015. The Company believes these estimates are reasonable and the significant effects of the acquisition are properly reflected.

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

UNAUDITED

Purchase price:
Fair value of Hawker's common stock issued (1)	$	~~201~~100,~~027~~527
Fair value of common stock warrant issued by Hawker (2)		330,000
Loan made by Hawker group to TEG prior to closing		1,663,227
Total purchase price		21,~~194~~763,~~254~~754
Estimated fair value of liabilities assumed:
Loan payable to Bank of the West, plus accrued interest		4,011,882
Loan payable to Bank of the West (“BOTW”), plus accrued interest (Note 6)		4,011,882
Accounts payable		842,890
Accrued liabilities		83109,~~063~~073
Asset retirement obligation		1,743,558
Retirement liability		998,471
Deferred income taxes		32,~~207~~959,000
Amount attributable to liabilities assumed		10,~~886~~664,~~864~~874
Total purchase price and assumed liabilities	$	1312,~~081~~428,~~118~~628
Estimated fair value of assets acquired:
Cash	$	23,344
Other current assets		7,025
Fixed assets – operating machinery and equipment		2,069,792
Identifiable intangible asset		175,000
Oil properties - proven, full cost method		10,~~805~~153,~~957~~467
Amount attributable to assets acquired	$	1312,~~081~~428,~~118~~628

(1) 31,~~000~~500,000 shares of Hawker common stock at $0.067 per share, being the estimated fair value implied by the sale of Units described in Note 16. Our common stock is considered “thinly-traded” due to the extremely low level of trading activity (many days have no volume or volume less than $1,000 in value), the estimated value of the common stock based on cash sales to third-parties is significantly more meaningful in regards to fair value. The 1,500,000 share amount reflects 3,000,000 Hawker shares and a Warrant initially issued on the February 3, 2015, closing, less the cancellation of 1,500,000 shares and the Warrant on March 18, 2015.

(2) 5 year warrant issued for 5 million shares of Hawker common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 per share, fair value based on using the Black-Scholes Option Pricing Model.

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

UNAUDITED

AsThe ofresults ~~the closing~~ of ~~the~~operations ~~TEG Acquisition, TEG was in default in its payment obligations to Bank~~ of ~~the West (“BOTW”), Sefton’s senior lender, in the aggregate amount of $4,011,882. BOTW consented to our acquisition of~~ TEG ~~and~~from ~~has agreed to forbear taking enforcement action against TEG on~~ the ~~senior~~February ~~loan provided that (i) Hawker lend TEG not less than $350~~1,~~000~~ ~~within~~2015 90effective ~~days~~closing ofdate ~~the~~through ~~TEG~~May ~~Acquisition~~31, ~~(ii) interest on TEG's obligations to BOTW be increased to 9%~~2015, ~~with~~have abeen ~~monthly~~included ~~pay~~in ~~rate of 5% and~~ the remaining deferred 4% of unpaid interest compounded monthly, (iii) the proceeds of any sale, assignment, licensing or other transfer of any real or personal property rights which serve as collateral for TEG'Company’s ~~obligations~~consolidated tostatements BOTW be remitted directly to BOTW, and (iv) commencing no later than the first month after which the California Midway-Sunset First Purchase Price as published by the U.S. Energy Information Administration exceeds $60 per barrel, TEG will begin making outstanding property tax payments to the County of ~~Los Angeles of at least $15,000 per month~~operations. ~~See Note 6 for further description of the BOTW loan.~~

The following unaudited pro forma combined results of operations ofare ~~TEG~~provided ~~from~~for the ~~February~~nine 1month periods ended May 31, 2015 ~~effective~~and ~~closing~~2014 ~~date~~as ~~through~~though ~~February~~the 28TEG Acquisition had been completed as of the beginning of the earliest period presented, ~~2015~~or September 1, 2013. These pro forma combined results of operations have been ~~included~~prepared inby ~~Hawker’s consolidated~~adjusting ~~statements~~the historical results of the Company to include the historical results of TEG. These supplemental pro forma results of operations are provided for ~~the~~illustrative ~~three~~purposes only, and ~~six~~do ~~months~~not ~~ended~~purport ~~February~~to 28be indicative of the actual results that would have been achieved by the combined company for the periods presented or that may be achieved by the combined company in the future. The pro forma results of operations do not include any cost savings or other synergies that resulted, ~~2015~~or may result, from the acquisition or any estimated costs that will be incurred to integrate TEG. Future results may vary significantly from the results reflected in this pro forma financial information because of future events and transactions, as well as other factors.

The following unaudited pro forma combined results of operations are provided for the six month periods ended February 28, 2015 and 2014 as though the acquisition had been completed as of the beginning of the earliest period presented, or September 1, 2013. These pro forma combined results of operations have been prepared by adjusting the historical results of Hawker to include the historical results of TEG. These supplemental pro forma results of operations are provided for illustrative purposes only, and do not purport to be indicative of the actual results that would have been achieved by the combined company for the periods presented or that may be achieved by the combined company in the future. The pro forma results of operations do not include any cost savings or other synergies that resulted, or may result, from the acquisition or any estimated costs that will be incurred to integrate TEG. Future results may vary significantly from the results reflected in this pro forma financial information because of future events and transactions, as well as other factors.

(in thousands, except per share amounts)	Nine Months Ended May 31,
	2015			2014
Revenues	$	1,281		$	2,482
Net (loss)	$	(3,750	)	$	(962	)
Net (loss) per share:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.05	)	$	(0.03	)

	Six Months Ended February 28,
	2015			2014
Revenues	$	1,002		$	2,413
Net (loss) income	$	(3,024	)	$	20
Net loss per share:
Basic and diluted	$	(0.04	)	$	-

For the nine month period ended May 31, 2015, the Company recognized $332,571 of sales of crude oil (net of royalties) less production costs, professional fees and general and administrative costs of $585,330, and depletion, depreciation, and amortization of $103,351 related to properties acquired in the TEG Acquisition, being the results from operations beginning with the closing of the acquisition effective February 1, 2015. In addition, interest expense was $131,936 on the BOTW loan and certain other TEG obligations, and a deferred tax recovery of $44,746 was recorded. Additionally, non-recurring transaction costs of $276,012 related to the acquisition for the nine month period ended May 31, 2015, are included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as professional fees; however, these non-recurring transaction costs have been excluded from the pro forma results in the above table.

~~For~~Historically, ~~the~~TEG’s ~~three~~fiscal ~~and~~year ~~six~~end ~~month~~was ~~periods~~December ~~ended~~31st ~~February~~and ~~28, 2015,~~ the Company’s ~~recognized~~fiscal ~~$72,597~~year ofend ~~sales~~is ofAugust ~~crude~~31st. For ~~oil~~the ~~(net~~nine ofmonths ~~royalties)~~ended ~~less~~May ~~production costs~~31, ~~professional~~2015 ~~fees~~ and ~~general and administrative costs of $79~~2014,~~776,~~ ~~and~~the ~~depletion,~~operating ~~depreciation,~~results ~~and~~for ~~amortization~~TEG ofincluded ~~$26,855 related to properties acquired~~ in the ~~TEG~~pro ~~acquisition,~~forma ~~being~~financial ~~the~~information ~~results~~above ~~from~~are ~~operations~~for ~~beginning with~~ the ~~closing~~period offrom ~~the~~July ~~acquisition effective February~~ 1, ~~2015. In~~through ~~addition,~~December ~~interest expense was $28~~31,~~263~~ on2014 ~~the~~and ~~BOTW~~from ~~loan. Additionally,~~October ~~non-recurring transaction costs of $71~~1,~~819~~ ~~and~~2013 ~~$280,884~~through ~~related~~June ~~to the acquisition for the three and six month periods ended February 28~~30, ~~2015~~2014, respectively, are included in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations as professional fees; however, these non-recurring transaction costs have been excluded from the pro forma results in the above table.

Historically, TEG’s fiscal year end was December 31st and Hawker’s fiscal year end is August 31st. For the six months ended February 28, 2015 and 2014, the operating results for TEG included in the pro forma financial information above are for the period from July 1 through December 31, 2014 and 2013.

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

UNAUDITED

5. SECURED SUBORDINATED LOAN RECEIVABLE, SHORT TERM

Between April 18, 2014 and January 31, 2015, we and our wholly-owned subsidiary, Tapia Holdings, LLC (“Tapia Holdings”), made a number of advances to TEG, pursuant to several secured subordinated notes and related security agreements, all as amended and restated into a Secured Subordinated Note dated January 12, 2015 (the “Note”), and a Fourth Amended and Restated Security Agreement dated January 12, 2015, each executed by TEG, and a Limited Recourse Guarantee (“Guarantee”) and a Pledge Agreement (“Pledge”), each executed by Sefton (collectively, the “Loan Receivable Agreements”). The Loan Receivable Agreements and an Intercreditor Agreement (defined below) were entered into in connection with what ultimately became ana ~~executed~~ Share Purchase Agreement to acquire TEG, which acquisition closed on February 3, 2015 (Note 4). The Guarantee and Pledge were terminated on closing of the TEG Acquisition.

Under the terms of the Loan Receivable Agreements, TEG agreed to pay us the principal sum of $2,100,000, or such lesser amount as may be outstanding from time to time, with interest on the unpaid principal amount at the rate of 3.0% per annum. We advanced $~~150,000 and $~~346,625 to TEG during the ~~three and~~ five months ended January 31, 2015, for a total at January 31, 2015 of $1,663,227, including accrued interest. The loan receivable was to have matured on December 31, 2015, at which time all outstanding principal and accrued interest would have been due and payable in full. The assets of TEG secured the Note, which was also guaranteed on a limited recourse basis by Sefton. Sefton’s Guarantee was secured by a pledge of all of the outstanding shares of TEG. The Note and our security interest in the assets of TEG are subordinate to senior indebtedness of TEG, pursuant to an Amended and Restated Subordination and Intercreditor Agreement (“Intercreditor Agreement”) dated January 1, 2015, as amended, by and among Tapia Holdings, ~~Hawker,~~ TEG, Sefton, TEG’s affiliate TEG MidContinent, Inc. (“TEGMC”), BOTW, and us. Sefton and TEGMC were effectively released from the Intercreditor Agreement on March 18, 2015 as described in Note 6.

The August 31, 2014 balance of the secured subordinated note receivable ~~was~~ comprised of $1,290,727 in principal and $7,595 in accrued interest receivable, for a total of $1,298,322. As noted above, the January 31, 2015 loan balance of $1,663,227 was not settled prior to the closing of the TEG Acquisition and this amount therefore ~~constitutes~~constituted additional consideration for the acquisition.

6. BANK LOAN PAYABLE

As discussed in Note 4, on February 3, 2015, TEG became our wholly-owned subsidiary. At the time of the ~~acquisition~~TEG Acquisition, TEG, along with Sefton and its subsidiary TEGMC, were in default under the terms of an Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”), dated October 1, 2008, among TEG, Sefton and TEGMC as “Borrowers”, and BOTW. Notwithstanding Borrowers’ default, BOTW had previously agreed on numerous occasions to forbear in exercising certain rights available to it under the Credit Agreement, in each case, subject to various terms and conditions. BOTW’s agreement to forbear was memorialized by a Forbearance Agreement among Borrowers and BOTW, which has been amended on several occasions.

On January 1, 2015, in anticipation of ~~our~~the ~~acquisition of~~ TEG Acquisition, we entered into a Fifth Amendment to Forbearance Agreement (“Fifth Amendment”) among Sefton, TEG, TEGMC, ~~Hawker~~BOTW and ~~BOTW~~us. Under or in connection with the Fifth Amendment, (i) ~~Hawker~~we agreed to lend TEG not less than $350,000, (ii) Tapia Holdings, aour subsidiary ~~of Hawker~~, assigned to ~~Hawker~~us all of Tapia Holdings’ right, title and interest in outstanding loans made by Tapia Holdings to TEG evidenced by a Subordinated Note due December 29, 2014 in the original principal amount of $1,500,000, (iii) ~~Hawker~~we agreed not to contest or otherwise oppose an order appointing a receiver for the assets of TEG at the end of the period in which BOTW has agreed to forbear in exercising its rights under the Credit Agreement (the “Forbearance Period”), (iv) Tapia Holdings assigned to ~~Hawker~~us all of Tapia Holdings’ right to acquire 100% of the stock of TEG from Sefton, (v) effective as of January 1, 2015, the interest rate accruing on the principal of the Loan was increased to 9% with a monthly pay rate of 5% and the remaining 4% of unpaid interest to be accrued and compounded monthly until termination of the Forbearance Period and full payment of the Loan, and the default rate was increased to 14%, (vi) Borrowers agreed that the proceeds from any sale, assignment, licensing or other transfer of real or personal property rights that serve as collateral for the Loan will be remitted directly to BOTW, and (vii) Borrowers agreed to pay at least $15,000 per month of outstanding property taxes, commencing with the first month in which the California Midway-Sunset First Purchase Price as published by the U.S. Energy Information Administration is greater than $60 per barrel. As and in consideration of the foregoing, under the Fifth Amendment, BOTW agreed to extend the Forbearance Period to December 31, 2015.

See Note 18 for a subsequent event concerning the loan payable to BOTW.

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

UNAUDITED

As a result of the TEG Acquisition, TEG was no longer affiliated with Sefton or TEGMC and, accordingly, Sefton and TEGMC subsequently requested that BOTW release them from any further liability under the Credit Agreement as Borrowers. On March 18, 2015, we entered into a Sixth Amendment to Forbearance Agreement (“Sixth Amendment”) among Sefton, TEG, TEGMC, BOTW and us. Under the Sixth Amendment, BOTW released Sefton and TEGMC from all of their respective obligations under the Credit Agreement (other than any surviving obligations in respect of indemnification) and removed Sefton and TEGMC as Borrowers under the Credit Agreement. As and in consideration of that release, BOTW (i) was paid $400,000 by Sefton, which was applied against the amount outstanding under the loan from BOTW to TEG, and (ii) received a Collateral Assignment of Note, executed by Sefton in favor of BOTW and acknowledged and agreed to by us, collaterally assigning to BOTW a Promissory Note dated March 18, 2015 in the principal amount of $400,000, issued by us in favor of Sefton (the “Hawker Note”). In addition, under the terms of the Sixth Amendment, Sefton returned to us for cancellation (a) the Warrant and (b) 1,500,000 shares of our common stock. The Hawker Note bears simple interest at the rate of 6% per annum and is due on the earlier to occur of (i) March 18, 2018, or (ii) expiration of certain of BOTW’s covenants to forbear in exercising its rights under the Credit Agreement. Upon payment in full of the loan obligations to BOTW, the Hawker Note will be returned to us for cancellation.

7. LOANS PAYABLE TO RELATED PARTIES, SHORT TERM

Loans payable to related parties, short term, consist of the following at ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, and August 31, 2014:

	February 28,		August 31,
	May 31,		August 31,
	2015		2014
Darren Katic	$	~~242~~378,~~300~~800	$	161,000
Manhattan Holdings, LLC		90,000		60,000
Gerald Tywoniuk		6035,000		-
Kristian Andresen		5641,~~025~~026		-
Total short-term loans		448,325		221,000
Charles Moore		20,000		-
Accrued interest payable		22,104		5,876
Total short-term loans		564,826		221,000
Loans payable to related parties, short term	$	470,429	$	226,876
Accrued interest payable		34,130		5,876
Loans payable to related parties, short term	$	598,956	$	226,876

Loans payable to related parties are unsecured and bear interest at 10% per annum~~. Mr.~~, ~~Katic~~except for Charles Moore’s loan which is ~~due on demand~~undocumented. OfDarren ~~the~~Katic’s ~~Manhattan Holdings, LLC~~ loan ~~balance,~~is ~~$60,000 was originally~~ due on ~~October~~demand. Other ~~31,~~loans ~~2014,~~except ~~but~~for ~~the~~Mr. ~~maturity~~Moore’s ~~date on that portion was extended to January 31, 2015, in combination with an additional $30,000~~ loan~~. Other~~ ~~loans~~ were due on January 31, 2015. No arrangements have been made to date to deal with these past due maturity dates. All loans from related parties above have been treated as short-term loans. Mr. Katic is an officer, director and significant shareholder. Manhattan Holdings, LLC, ~~and~~ Gerald Tywoniuk and Mr. Moore are significant shareholders. Kristian Andresen is a director and significant shareholder.

8. SHORT TERM DEBT

Short term debt comprises the following at May 31, 2015, and August 31, 2014:

	May 31, 2015		August 31, 2014
Hawker Note payable to Sefton	$	404,866	$	-
Convertible note payable, short term		56,296		862,450
Short term loan		55,000		-
Short term debt	$	516,162	$	862,450

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

UNAUDITED

~~8. CONVERTIBLE~~Note ~~NOTES~~Payable ~~PAYABLE,~~to ~~SHORT TERM~~Sefton

~~Between~~As ~~May~~described 13in Note 6, ~~2014~~the $400,000 Hawker Note payable to Sefton and ~~February~~assigned 28to BOTW, issued March 18, 2015, webears ~~issued~~simple ainterest ~~number~~at the rate of ~~convertible~~6% ~~notes~~per ~~payable~~annum and is due on the earlier to occur of (~~“CNP”~~i)~~. All~~ March 18, ~~were~~2018, ~~issued~~or in(ii) expiration ~~amounts~~of ~~equal~~certain of BOTW’s covenants to forbear in exercising its rights under the ~~cash~~Credit weAgreement. ~~received,~~Upon ~~and~~payment ~~bear~~in ~~simple~~full ~~interest~~of onthe loan obligations to BOTW, the ~~unpaid~~Hawker ~~principal~~Note ~~balance~~will atbe ~~12%~~returned ~~per~~to ~~annum~~us for cancellation. At May 31, ~~which~~2015, isaccrued interest payable onwas ~~maturity~~$4,866.

Convertible ~~notes~~Notes ~~payable~~Payable, ~~short~~Short ~~term, consist of the following at February 28, 2015, and August 31, 2014; conversion features, security provisions and warrants to acquire common stock of Hawker are also set forth below:~~Term

	Issue Date	Maturity Date	February 28, 2015		August 31, 2014
CNP 1 (1) (2) (3)(7)	June 25, 2014	November 30, 2014	$	-	$	350,000
CNP 2 (1) (2) (3)	May 30, 2014	November 30, 2014		-		250,000
CNP 3 (1) (3) (4)	July 17, 2014	June 30, 2015		-		100,000
CNP 4 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)	July 17, 2014	July 10, 2015		-		100,000
CNP 5 (6)	May 13, 2014	May 13, 2016		50,000		50,000
CNP 6 (1) (2) (3) (4)	July 25, 2014	July 25, 2015		-		50,000
CNP 7 (1) (2) (3) (4)	August 28, 2014	July 25, 2015		-		30,000
CNP 8 (1)(3)(4)(8)	September 26, 2014	September 26, 2015		-		-
CNP 9 (1)(2)(3)(7)(8)	November 3, 2014	May 3, 2015		-		-
				50,000		930,000
Less unamortized discount (7)				-		(89,149	)
Accrued interest payable				4,784		21,599
Convertible notes payable, short term			$	54,784	$	862,450

Between May 13, 2014, and May 31, 2015, we issued a number of convertible notes payable (“CNP”). All were issued in amounts equal to the cash we received, and bear simple interest on the unpaid principal balance at 12% per annum, which is payable on maturity.

~~(1)~~ Convertible atnotes ~~any~~payable, ~~time~~short atterm, ~~the~~consist ~~option~~ of the ~~investor~~following ~~into “Conversion Units.” Each Conversion Unit consists of one share of common stock of Hawker and one warrant to purchase one-half share of common stock of Hawker~~ at anMay exercise price of $0.25 per share. The number of Conversion Units into which the note is convertible is computed by dividing all of the then outstanding principal and accrued interest under the note by $0.10 (as appropriately adjusted for any stock splits31, stock combinations or similar events). Each warrant has a five-year life from the date the convertible note payable was issued. In the event Hawker sells common stock for less than $0.10 per share2015, ~~the conversion rate for CNP 1~~ and 9August ~~shall be adjusted to that price. In the case of CNP 1 and 2~~31, ~~the notes were amended September 18,~~ 2014,; ~~to limit the~~ conversion offeatures, asecurity ~~part~~provisions orand ~~the~~warrants ~~entire convertible note payable at any one time~~ to aacquire ~~maximum~~our ~~beneficial ownership in Hawker of 4.99% of the number of shares of~~ common stock ~~outstanding~~are ~~immediately~~also ~~after~~set ~~giving~~forth ~~effect to the conversion. CNP 9, with a face amount of $25,000 is similarly limited to a 4.99% maximum beneficial ownership.~~below:

(2) Hawker granted a security interest to the investor in all of Hawker’s assets.

	Issue Date	Maturity Date	May 31, 2015		August 31, 2014

CNP 1 (1) (2) (3)(7)	June 25, 2014	November 30, 2014	$	-	$	350,000

CNP 2 (1) (2) (3)	May 30, 2014	November 30, 2014		-		250,000

CNP 3 (1) (3) (4)	July 17, 2014	June 30, 2015		-		100,000
CNP 4 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)	July 17, 2014	July 10, 2015		-		100,000
CNP 5 (6)	May 13, 2014	May 13, 2016		50,000		50,000
CNP 6 (1) (2) (3) (4)	July 25, 2014	July 25, 2015		-		50,000
CNP 7 (1) (2) (3) (4)	August 28, 2014	July 25, 2015		-		30,000
CNP 8 (1)(3)(4)(8)	September 26, 2014	September 26, 2015		-		-

CNP 9 (1)(2)(3)(7)(8)	November 3, 2014	May 3, 2015		-		-
				50,000		930,000
Less unamortized discount (7)				-		(89,149	)
Accrued interest payable				6,296		21,599

Convertible notes payable, short term			$	56,296	$	862,450

(3) The proceeds were required to be used solely for the purpose of allowing Tapia Holdings to make advances to TEG under the terms of the secured subordinated loan receivable described in Note 5. Any repayment of such advances by TEG to Tapia Holdings must be used by us to immediately first repay convertible notes payable to the holder of CNP 1, 2 and 3, and second to repay other convertible notes payable pro rata.

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

UNAUDITED

(41) ~~Conversion~~Convertible at any time at the option of ~~unpaid~~the ~~principal~~investor into “Conversion Units.” ~~pursuant~~Each Conversion Unit consists of one share of our common stock and one warrant to purchase one-half share of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.25 per share. The number of Conversion Units into which the ~~terms~~note inis convertible is computed by dividing all of the then outstanding principal and accrued interest under the note by $0.10 (1as appropriately adjusted for any stock splits, stock combinations or similar events). Each ~~above~~warrant has a five-year life from the date the convertible note payable was ~~mandatory~~issued. If ~~upon~~we ~~Hawker~~sell ~~closing~~common stock for less than $0.10 per share, the ~~TEG~~conversion ~~Acquisition~~rate infor ~~February~~CNP ~~2015~~1 asand ~~described~~9 inshall ~~Note~~be 4adjusted to that price. ~~Conversion~~In the case of ~~unpaid~~CNP ~~interest~~1 ~~into~~and ~~Conversion~~2, ~~Units~~the ~~was~~notes were amended September 18, 2014, to limit the conversion of a part or the entire convertible note payable at any one time to a maximum beneficial ownership in us of 4.99% of the ~~election~~number of ~~Hawker~~shares of common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the conversion. CNP 9, ~~which~~with ~~election~~a ~~Hawker~~face ~~made~~amount of $25,000 is similarly limited to a 4.99% maximum beneficial ownership.

(2) Hawker granted a security interest to the investor in all of our assets.

(4) Conversion of unpaid principal into Conversion Units pursuant to the terms in (1) above was mandatory upon our closing the TEG Acquisition in February 2015 as described in Note 4. Conversion of unpaid interest into Conversion Units was at our election, which election we made.

(5) The holder is related to Darren Katic, who is an officer, director and significant shareholder.

(6) Unpaid principal and accrued interest is convertible at any time at the option of the holder into common shares in an amount computed by dividing the amount converted by $0.10 (as appropriately adjusted for any stock splits, stock combinations or similar events). Repayment of the convertible note payable is required on collection of the secured subordinated loan receivable described in Note 5 if earlier than the maturity date above. As ~~Hawker~~we expected to receive repayment on the secured subordinated loan receivable or close on the TEG acquisition within one year, this convertible note payable was classified as a short-term liability.

(7) The unamortized discount relates to CNP 1 ($350,000) and CNP 9 ($25,000). ~~This is described further immediately below.~~

(8) Original principal amounts were $25,000 for CNP 8 and $25,000 for CNP 9.

CNP 1 (principal amount $350,000), CNP 2 (principal amount $250,000) and CNP 9 (principal amount $25,000) were considered extinguished for accounting purposes when they were rolled over into the long term Secured Convertible Note Payable described in Note 9.

~~9. LONG~~Short ~~TERM~~term ~~DEBT~~loan

~~Long~~On ~~term~~May ~~debt~~8, 2015, a third party advanced $55,000 to us with terms to be determined at a later date. This party is ~~comprised~~also one of ~~the~~two ~~following~~that atcomprise ~~February~~non-controlling ~~28,~~interest ~~2015,~~in ~~and~~Tapia ~~August~~Holdings ~~31,~~as ~~2014:~~described in Note 16.

	February 28, 2015			August 31, 2014
Convertible note payable, long term	$	134,127		$	-
Overriding royalty interest liability		274,710			-
Net profits interest payable		159,322			169,104
Note payable and other		64,414			-
Total long term debt		632,573			169,104
Less current portion		(208,346	)		(20,065	)
Long term debt, net of current portion	$	424,227		$	149,039

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

UNAUDITED

9. LONG TERM DEBT

Long term debt is comprised of the following at May 31, 2015, and August 31, 2014:

	May 31, 2015			August 31, 2014
Convertible note payable, long term	$	192,632		$	-
Overriding royalty interest liability		297,705			-
Net profits interest payable		154,245			169,104
Note payable and other		132,449			-
Total long term debt		777,031			169,104
Less current portion		(326,214	)		(20,065	)
Long term debt, net of current portion	$	450,817		$	149,039

Convertible Note Payable, Long Term

On January 14, 2015, we executed a term sheet to provide for a Third Amended and Restated Secured Convertible Promissory Note to an outside investor (the “Secured Convertible Note Payable”), in the aggregate principal amount of $1,000,000, to mature in two years. Completion of definitive documentation occurred on May 27, 2015.

AThe Secured Convertible Note Payable was issued in consideration of additional proceeds to us in the amount of $250,000 (of which $200,000 was funded January 15, 2015, and $50,000 was funded February 26, 2015) and cancellation of previously issued notes to the investor in the amounts of $250,000, $350,000, and $25,000 (as well as accrued interest on each), the first two of which had maturity dates of November 30, 2014, and the latter of which had a maturity date of May 3, 2015. The ~~holder has the option of advancing a further $125,000 by June 30, 2015. The~~ maturity date of the ~~note is December 31, 2016. The~~ Secured Convertible Note Payable bears interest on the unpaid principal balance of the Secured Convertible Note Payable at the rate of 12% per annum. Interest payments become payable quarterly beginning July 31, 2015, accruing interest until then. The Secured Convertible Note Payable will be convertible at any time at the option of the investor into shares of Hawker common stock computed by dividing all of the then outstanding principal and accrued interest under the Secured Convertible Note Payable by $0.10 (as appropriately adjusted for any stock splits, stock combinations or similar events) (the “Conversion Rate”). However, if we subsequently sell common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for common stock at a price lower than the Conversion Rate (subject to customary exclusions), then the Conversion Rate then in effect will be automatically reduced to the lower price. We will at all times reserve and keep available out of our authorized but unissued shares a sufficient number of shares of common stock to give effect to the conversion of the Secured Convertible Note Payable. Unless notified in advance by the investor, conversion of a part or the entire Secured Convertible Note Payable is ~~limited~~December at any one time to a maximum beneficial ownership interest in Hawker of 4.99% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the conversion. The proceeds from the Secured Convertible Note Payable are to be used for the purpose of allowing us to make advances to TEG, under the terms of a note receivable from TEG, and for general working capital. Any repayment by TEG of the advances under the terms of the note receivable must be used by us to immediately make repayment to the investor under the terms of the Secured Convertible Note Payable. To secure our obligations under the Secured Convertible Note Payable, we granted a security interest to the investor in all of our right, title and interest under the TEG note receivable, our second priority security interest in TEG’s assets and in the interest of our subsidiary SCNRG, LLC in the oil-producing property known as the DEEP Lease. The Secured Convertible Note Payable also contains other terms and covenants that are customary for a promissory note of this type. In addition, we granted to the investor a 2.5% or 3.5% overriding royalty interest, depending on the lease, in oil sales from the TEG Assets. Such amount accrues until TEG’s lender, BOTW, has been paid in full; however, payment of royalties shall begin by January 31, 2016 ~~or an event of default under the Secured Convertible Note Payable will occur~~. While interest and royalties are being accrued, no cash payments can be made to repay loans made to Hawker by Mr. Katic, nor can Hawker repurchase any non-controlling interest owned by Mr. Moore nor pay any salaries to Messrs. Katic and Moore.

The ~~Company~~Secured ~~identified~~Convertible anNote ~~embedded~~Payable ~~derivative~~bears ~~related~~interest toon the ~~Conversion~~unpaid ~~Rate~~principal ~~reset~~balance ~~provision. The accounting treatment~~ of ~~derivative financial instruments requires that~~ the ~~Company~~Secured ~~record~~Convertible ~~the~~Note ~~fair~~Payable ~~value~~at of the ~~derivative~~rate as of ~~the~~12% ~~date~~per ~~of each advance under the note and to adjust the fair value as of each subsequent balance sheet date~~annum. ~~The~~Interest ~~Company~~payments ~~determined~~become apayable ~~fair~~quarterly ~~value~~beginning ofJuly ~~$540~~31,~~084~~ ~~of the embedded derivative~~2015, inaccruing ~~aggregate,~~interest ~~for~~until ~~the two advances made under the note since inception in January 2015~~then. See Note 10 for further discussion of the assumptions in determining this fair value and subsequent adjustment of fair value at period end. The initial fair value of the embedded derivative creates a discount on the Secured Convertible Note Payable book balance.

InThe ~~addition,~~Secured Convertible Note Payable is convertible at any time at the ~~granting~~option of the ~~overriding~~investor ~~royalty~~into ~~interest~~shares ~~also~~of ~~requires~~our ~~the~~common ~~allocation~~stock, ofcomputed aby ~~portion~~dividing all of the ~~proceeds~~then ~~received~~outstanding toprincipal aand ~~separate~~accrued ~~liability. This~~interest ~~amount~~under ~~was~~the ~~estimated~~Secured toConvertible beNote Payable by $~~263~~0.10 (as appropriately adjusted for any stock splits,~~759~~ stock combinations or similar events) (the “Conversion Rate”). However, ~~see~~if ~~below~~we subsequently sell common stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for ~~further~~common ~~discussion~~stock at a price lower than the Conversion Rate (subject to customary exclusions), then the Conversion Rate then in effect will be automatically reduced to the lower price. We will at all times reserve and keep available out of our authorized but unissued shares a sufficient number of shares of common stock to give effect to the ~~assumptions~~conversion ~~used~~of the Secured Convertible Note Payable. ~~Such~~Unless ~~allocation~~notified ~~also~~in ~~creates~~advance by the investor, conversion of a ~~discount~~part onor the entire Secured Convertible Note Payable ~~book~~is ~~balance~~limited at any one time to a maximum beneficial ownership interest of 4.99% of the number of shares of our common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the conversion.

The ~~total~~proceeds ~~debt~~from ~~discount amounted to $803,843 and is being amortized using~~ the ~~effective~~Secured ~~interest~~Convertible ~~method. We~~Note ~~amortized~~Payable ~~$8,025~~were asused ~~interest~~to ~~expense~~make ~~due~~advances to ~~the~~TEG, ~~accretion~~under of the ~~discount~~terms ~~between the dates~~ of ~~advances~~a innote ~~January~~receivable ~~and~~from ~~February~~TEG, ~~2015~~ and ~~February~~for ~~28,~~general ~~2015~~working capital. ~~The~~Any ~~unamortized~~repayment ~~discount~~by asTEG of ~~February~~the ~~28,~~advances ~~2015~~under ~~was~~the ~~$795,818~~terms ~~compared~~of tothe ~~none~~note atreceivable ~~August~~must ~~31,~~be ~~2014. The~~used ~~February~~by ~~28,~~us ~~2015~~to ~~amount~~immediately ~~will~~make berepayment ~~fully~~to ~~amortized by~~ the ~~December~~investor ~~31,~~under ~~2016~~the ~~maturity~~terms ~~date~~ of the Secured Convertible Note Payable. ~~The effective rate of interest is 184% per annum, including the 12% cash coupon, the conversion option and the granting of the overriding royalty interest.~~

To secure our obligations under the Secured Convertible Note Payable, we granted a security interest to the investor in all of our right, title and interest under the TEG note receivable, our second priority security interest in TEG’s assets and in the interest of our subsidiary SCNRG, LLC in the oil-producing property known as the DEEP Lease. The Secured Convertible Note Payable also contains other terms and covenants that are customary for a promissory note of this type.

In addition, we granted to the investor a 2.5% or 3.5% overriding royalty interest, depending on the lease, in oil sales from the TEG Assets. This amount accrues until TEG’s lender, BOTW, has been paid in full; however, payment of royalties shall begin by January 31, 2016 or an event of default under the Secured Convertible Note Payable will occur. While interest and royalties are being accrued, no cash payments can be made to repay loans made to us by Mr. Katic, nor can we repurchase any non-controlling interest owned by Mr. Moore nor pay any salaries to Messrs. Katic and Moore.

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

UNAUDITED

	Six Months Ended February 28, 2015			Year Ended August 31, 2014
Secured Convertible Note Payable, beginning of period	$	-		$	-
Roll over prior advances into new note		625,000			-
Capitalization of interest at Jan. 1, 2015		39,896			-
Additional advances in January and February 2015		250,000			-
Total advances		914,896			-
Discount created by embedded derivative (conversion option)		(540,084	)		-
Discount created by granting of overriding royalty interest		(263,759	)		-
Total discount		(803,843	)		-
Amortization of discount		8,025			-
Unamortized discount		(795,818	)		-
Accrued interest payable		15,049			-
Carrying value of Secured Convertible Note Payable, end of period		134,127			-
Less current portion		(113,910	)		-
Secured Convertible Note Payable, long term portion, end of period	$	20,217		$	-

We identified an embedded derivative related to the Conversion Rate reset provision. The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments required that we record the fair value of the derivative as of the date of each advance under the note and to adjust the fair value as of each subsequent balance sheet date. We determined a fair value of $540,084 of the embedded derivative, in aggregate, for the advances made under the note since inception in January 2015. See Note 10 for further discussion of the assumptions in determining this fair value and subsequent adjustment of fair value at period end. The initial fair value of the embedded derivative creates a discount on the Secured Convertible Note Payable book balance.

In addition, the granting of the overriding royalty interest also requires the allocation of a portion of the proceeds received to a separate liability. This amount was estimated to be $263,759, see below for further discussion of the assumptions used. Such allocation also creates a discount on the Secured Convertible Note Payable book balance.

The total debt discount amounted to $803,843 and is being amortized using the effective interest method. We amortized $41,363 as interest expense between the dates of advances in January and February 2015 until May 31, 2015. The unamortized discount as of May 31, 2015 was $762,480 compared to none at August 31, 2014. The May 31, 2015 amount will be fully amortized by the December 31, 2016 maturity date of the Secured Convertible Note Payable. The effective rate of interest is 184% per annum, including the 12% cash coupon, the conversion option and the granting of the overriding royalty interest.

	Nine Months Ended May 31, 2015			Year Ended August 31, 2014
Secured Convertible Note Payable, beginning of period	$	-		$	-
Roll over prior advances into new note		625,000			-
Capitalization of interest at Jan. 1, 2015		39,896			-
Additional advances in January and February 2015		250,000			-
Total advances		914,896			-

Discount created by embedded derivative (conversion option)		(540,084	)		-
Discount created by granting of overriding royalty interest		(263,759	)		-
Total discount		(803,843	)		-
Amortization of discount		41,363			-
Unamortized discount		(762,480	)		-

Accrued interest payable		40,216			-

Carrying value of Secured Convertible Note Payable, end of period		192,632			-
Less current portion		(140,981	)		-
Secured Convertible Note Payable, long term portion, end of period	$	51,651		$	-

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

UNAUDITED

Overriding Royalty Interest Liability (“ORRI Liability”)

Pursuant to an overriding royalty interest (“ORRI”) granted effective January 15, 2015 to the Secured Convertible Note Payable holder, as described immediately above, oil sales from the Tapia ~~oil~~Canyon field are subject to an additional 2.5% or 3.5% overriding royalty interest, depending on the lease. Since this royalty interest was granted in connection with a loan, the loan proceeds were bifurcated and this royalty interest has been accounted for as a separate liability.

The ORRI remains unrecorded with Los Angeles County until the BOTW loan is repaid, and royalties accrue and are not paid during this period. Upon recordation, (1) accrued royalties shall be paid or added to the Secured Convertible Note Payable above at TEG’s option and (2) current royalties are due and payable monthly in arrears. Failure to record the ORRI by January 14, 2016 will constitute an event of default under the Secured Convertible Note Payable.

Each reporting period, the liability’s estimated fair value is remeasured, with the change in fair value being reported in the consolidated statement of operations. There was no change in fair value during the period from grant date to May 31, 2015. The following assumptions were used by management to determine the fair value of the ORRI Liability as of January 15, 2015, and which assumptions remain unchanged at May 31, 2015:

Oil price	$65/barrel
Resulting reserves were included as follows:
Proved developed producing		100%	%
Proved developed non-producing		50%	%
Proved undeveloped		0%	%
Discount rate		35%	%

		Six Months Ended				Year Ended
	Nine Months Ended				Year Ended
		February 28,				August 31,
	May 31,				August 31,
	2015	~~2015~~			2014	~~2014~~
ORRI Liability, beginning of period		$	-			$	-
ORRI granted to holder of long-term convertible note payable			263,759				-
Current period accretion			10,951				-
Interest accrued			33,946				-
Change in estimated liability			-				-
Payments made			-				-
ORRI Liability, end of period			~~274~~297,~~710~~705				-
Less: current portion			(54111,~~542~~999	)			-
ORRI Liability, long-term portion		$	~~220~~185,~~168~~706			$	-

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

UNAUDITED

Net Profits Interest (“NPI”) Payable

In connection with SCNRG’s December 1, 2009 Purchase and Sale Agreement for the DEEP Lease, and as part of the purchase price consideration, SCNRG entered into an Assignment of Net Profit Interest with Christian Hall Petroleum. Pursuant to the agreement, SCNRG is required to make monthly payments to the holder in an amount equal to 40% of SCNRG’s share of net profit (as defined in the agreement) from production.

Until February 1, 2014, SCNRG’s working interest in the DEEP property was 66.67%, and the NPI agreement called for a minimum monthly payment of $1,985 (SCNRG’s 66.67% share). Beginning February 1, 2014, SCNRG’s working interest in the DEEP Lease increased to 87.18%, and its share of the minimum monthly payment became $2,596. Beginning May 15, 2014, SCNRG’s working interest in the DEEP Lease increased to 100.0%, and its share of the minimum monthly payment became $2,978. Payments are required until SCNRG and other working interest owners have made NPI payments in aggregate between $347,000 and $357,410 on or before December 31, 2022 (the actual maximum amount within this range is dependent on when SCNRG and other working interest owners satisfy their aggregate NPI payment obligations). As of ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, SCNRG and other working interest owners have made NPI payments totaling $~~143~~152,~~069~~003. SCNRG has paid its 66.67% working interest share of this amount through February 1, 2014, its subsequent 87.18% share through May 15, 2014, and ~~its~~then ~~subsequent~~ 100.0% share through ~~November~~May 3031, ~~2014~~2015.

Given its terminating nature, the discounted present value of the minimum monthly NPI payments was recorded as a liability at SCNRG’s December 1, 2009, acquisition date of a 66.67% working interest in the DEEP Lease, and this liability was increased pro rata when its working interest increased to 87.18% on February 1, 2014, and again on May 1415, 2014 when its working interest increased to 100.0%. The discount rate used in all cases was 10.0% per annum.

Changes in SCNRG’s share of the NPI liability are as follows for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015 and the year ended August 31, 2014:

	Six Months Ended				Year Ended
		Nine Months Ended				Year Ended
	February 28,				August 31,
		May 31,				August 31,
	~~2015~~	2015			~~2014~~	2014
NPI liability, beginning of period		$	169,104			$	124,597
Liabilities assumed in connection with acquisition of additional DEEP Lease working interests			-				58,847
Current period accretion			811,~~086~~943				14,104
Payments made			(1726,~~868~~802	)			(28,444	)
NPI liability, end of period			~~159~~154,~~322~~245				169,104
Less: current portion			(21,~~089~~621	)			(20,065	)
NPI liability, long-term portion		$	~~138~~132,~~233~~624			$	149,039

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

UNAUDITED

Note Payable And Other

Note Payable

On January 16, 2015, a relative of Mr. Katic advanced $50,000 to ~~Hawker~~us, and made further advances of $20,000 on March 19, 2015, and $100,000 on March 25, 2015, all of which were documented in a note payable on the latter date. Principal is tobeing be repaid at the rate of $7,083 per month beginning April 30, 2015 for 24 months.

Interest on the note payable is comprised of aan ~~March~~up ~~25,~~front ~~2015~~ issuance of 510,000 shares of common stock plus a 5-year warrant to purchase up to 500,000 shares of common stock for $0.25 per share.

A discount of $1967,~~757~~174 ~~based on advances to February 28, 2015~~ was recorded to reflect the pro rated value of the stock and warrants ~~to be~~ issued as interest. This discount ~~will~~is be amortized to interest expense over the term of the loan, using the effective interest method. The ~~amortization of discount recorded through February 28, 2015 was $1,053. The~~ effective rate of interest is 46.6%.

Other

Other long term debt represents an installment sales contract for the February 2015 purchase of a field vehicle, with 48 payments of $795 per month beginning April 4, 2015. The interest rate is 6.99%.

Total Note Payable and Other

	Six Months Ended February 28, 2015			Year Ended August 31, 2014
	Nine Months Ended May 31, 2015			Year Ended August 31, 2014
Balance, beginning of period	$	-		$	-
Note payable advance		50,000			-
Note payable advances		170,000			-
Less unamortized discount		(18,704	)		-
Repayments		(14,166	)		-
		31,296			-
Principal outstanding		155,834			-
Installment sales contract liability		33,118			-
Initial discount		(67,174	)		-
Total note payable and other		64,414			-
Amortization of discount		12,458			-
Less current portion		(18,805	)		-
Unamortized discount		(54,716	)		-
Note payable and other, long term portion, end of period	$	45,609		$	-
Carrying value of note payable		101,118			-
Installment sales contract liability		31,331			-
Total note payable and other		132,449			-
Less current portion		(51,613	)		-
Note payable and other, long term portion, end of period	$	80,836		$	-

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

UNAUDITED

10. CONVERSION OPTION

Conversion Option, Short Term

As described in Note 8, ~~the~~we ~~Company~~ identified an embedded derivative related to the Conversion Rate reset provision in the Short Term Secured Convertible Notes Payable. The repayment is subject to the convertible features of each note. Each creditor has a conversion option allowing it to choose to receive repayment of the stated principal either in cash or, at each creditor’s option the note is convertible into “Conversion Units.” Each Conversion Unit consists of one share of our common stock ~~of Hawker~~ and one warrant to purchase one-half share of our common stock ~~of Hawker~~ at an exercise price of $0.25 per share. The number of Conversion Units into which the note is convertible is computed by dividing all of the then outstanding principal and accrued interest under the note by $0.10 (as appropriately adjusted for any stock splits, stock combinations or similar events). Each warrant has a five-year life from the date the convertible note payable was issued. Each note has an anti-dilution provision that allows for the automatic reset of the conversion price upon any future sale of common stock or instruments exchangeable for or convertible into common stock below the then current conversion price of the note.

The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that ~~the~~we ~~Company~~ record the fair value of the derivative as of the date of each note issuance and to adjust the fair value as of each subsequent balance sheet date. At the inception of the $350,000 and $25,000 notes, ~~the~~we ~~Company~~ determined a fair value of $139,051 and $7,418, respectively, of the embedded derivative. The fair value of the embedded derivative was determined using the Black-Scholes Pricing Model based on the following assumptions for each of the two notes:

Dividend yield:	0 and 0	%
Volatility	178 and 200	%
Risk free rate:	0.05 and 0.02	%

As discussed in Note 8, the Short Term Secured Convertible Notes Payable were considered extinguished on January 14, 2015 when their balances were rolled into a new Secured Convertible Note Payable. Accordingly, the $97,398 fair value of the short term conversion option at November 30, 2014 was recorded as additional paid in capital on January 14, 2015. The fair value of the described embedded derivative at that date was determined using the Black-Scholes Pricing Model with the following assumptions:

Dividend yield:	0	%
Volatility	214	%
Risk free rate:	0.025	%

The non-cash, non-operating gain resulting from the fair value accounting was $0 and $34,662 for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015.

The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of the short term conversion option for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015 and the year ended August 31, 2014:

	Six Months Ended February 28, 2015			Year Ended August 31, 2014
	Nine Months Ended May 31, 2015			Year Ended August 31, 2014
Balance, beginning of period	$	122,045		$	-
Initial fair value of debt derivatives at advance dates		7,418			139,051
Initial fair value of debt derivative on accrual of interest		2,597			2,630
Change in fair value of debt derivatives		(34,662	)		(19,636	)
Extingushment of conversion option		(97,398	)		-
Extinguishment of conversion option		(97,398	)		-
Balance, end of period	$	-		$	122,045

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

UNAUDITED

Conversion Option, Long Term

As described in Note 9, ~~the~~we ~~Company~~ identified an embedded derivative related to the Conversion Rate reset provision in the Long Term Secured Convertible Note Payable. The repayment is subject to the convertible features of the note. The Secured Convertible Note Payable can be convertible at any time at the option of the investor into shares of ~~Hawker~~our common stock , computed by dividing all of the then outstanding principal and accrued interest under the Secured Convertible Note Payable by $0.10 (as appropriately adjusted for any stock splits, stock combinations or similar events) (the “Conversion Rate”). However, if we subsequently sell common stock or securities convertible into or ~~exchangable~~exchangeable for common stock at a price lower than the Conversion Rate (subject to customary exclusions), then the Conversion Rate then in effect will be automatically reduced to the lower price.

The accounting treatment of derivative financial instruments requires that ~~the~~we ~~Company~~ record the fair value of the derivative as of the date of each advance under the note and to adjust the fair value as of each subsequent balance sheet date. ~~The~~We ~~Company~~ determined aan initial fair value of $540,084 of the embedded derivative, in aggregate, for the ~~two~~ advances made under the note since inception in January 2015. The fair value of the embedded derivative was determined using the Black-Scholes Pricing Model based on the following assumptions for each of the two notes:

Dividend yield:	0 and 0	%
Volatility	236 and 252	%
Risk free rate:	0.51 and 0.63	%

The long term conversion option, being the fair value of the described embedded derivative, of $~~547~~404,~~886~~568 at ~~February~~May 2831, 2015 compares to none at August 31, 2014, and was determined using the Black-Scholes Pricing Model with the following assumptions:

Dividend yield:	0	%
Volatility	~~252~~177	%
Risk free rate:	0.6344	%

At ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, ~~the~~we ~~Company~~ adjusted the recorded fair value of the long term conversion option to market resulting in non-cash, non-operating ~~loss~~gain of $7162,~~802~~992 and $155,190 for the ~~quarter~~three and nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, respectively. Together with the non-cash, non-operating gains on the short term conversion options described above, the total non-cash, non-operating gain (loss) was ($7162,~~802)~~992 and $26189,~~860~~852 for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015. There were no such gains or losses in the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2014.

The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of the long term conversion option for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015 and the year ended August 31, 2014:

	Six Months Ended February 28, 2015			Year Ended August 31, 2014
	Nine Months Ended May 31, 2015			Year Ended August 31, 2014
Balance, beginning of period	$	-		$	-
Initial fair value of debt derivatives at advance dates		540,084			-
Change in fair value of debt derivatives		7,802			-
Initial fair value of debt derivatives on accrual of interest		19,674
Balance, end of period	$	547,886		$	-
Change in fair value of debt derivatives		(155,190	)		-
Balance, end of period	$	404,568		$	-

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

UNAUDITED

11. EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT LIABILITY

A retirement benefit has been provided to two TEG employees with employment contracts. The retirement payment is based on the individual’s ending monthly salary at the date of retirement times a multiple for years of service. This multiple ranges from one month of base salary for two years of service or less, to two and a half times monthly salary for ten or more years of service. The retirement dates under the agreements are 2020 and 2022. No employees had this arrangement at August 31, 2014 because at that date we had not yet acquired TEG. The assumed discount rates used to measure the postemployment benefit liability were 4.48% and 4.56% at February 3, 2015, the TEG acquisition date, and 45.5404% and 45.6315% at ~~February~~May 2831, 2015.

	Six Months Ended				Year Ended
		Nine Months Ended			Year Ended
	February 28,				August 31,
		May 31,			August 31,
	~~2015~~	2015			2014
Employee retirement obligations, beginning		$	-			$	-
Liabilities acquired during the period			998,471				-
Liabilities settled during the period			-				-
Current period expense (benefit)			(14,308	)			-
Current period expense			23,044				-
Employee retirement obligations, ending		$	~~984~~1,~~163~~021,515			$	-

12. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS

Our asset retirement obligations relate to the abandonment of oil wells and related surface facilities. The amounts recognized are based on numerous estimates and assumptions, including future retirement costs, inflation rates and credit adjusted risk-free interest rates.

The following shows the changes in asset retirement obligations for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015 and the year ended August 31, 2014:

	Six Months Ended			Year Ended
		NIne Months Ended		Year Ended
	February 28,			August 31,
		May 31,		August 31,
	~~2015~~	2015		2014
Asset retirement obligations, beginning		$	168,110		$	103,299
Liabilities acquired during the period			1,743,558			53,963
Liabilities settled during the period			-			-
Current period accretion			921,~~770~~220			10,848
Asset retirement obligations, ending		$	1,~~921~~932,~~438~~888		$	168,110

13. INCOME TAXES

There was no current ~~or deferred~~ income tax expense (or benefit) for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015 and 2014~~. A~~, ~~valuation~~and ~~allowance~~there ~~has~~was ~~been~~a ~~established~~deferred ~~against~~tax ~~net~~benefit ~~operating~~of ~~losses~~$44,746 ~~where~~for itthe isthree ~~more~~and ~~likely~~nine ~~than~~months ~~not~~ended ~~that~~May ~~such~~31, ~~losses~~2015. The ~~will~~deferred ~~expire~~tax ~~before~~liability ~~they~~arose ~~are~~on ~~utilized. Further,~~acquisition ~~at the date~~ of ~~the~~ TEG ~~acquisition~~, ~~TEG~~as ~~had~~book abasis ~~net~~exceeds ~~operating~~tax ~~loss~~basis ~~carryover~~for ofthe ~~approximately~~net ~~$16,905,000~~assets ~~available~~acquired. As tothis ~~offset~~difference ~~future~~reverses ~~income~~over ~~for~~time, ~~income~~the ~~tax~~associated ~~reporting~~deferred ~~purposes,~~tax ~~which~~benefit ~~will~~is ~~expire~~recorded in ~~various~~the ~~years~~income ~~through 2033, if not previously utilized~~statement. ~~However~~Otherwise, ~~our~~a ~~ability~~valuation toallowance ~~use~~has ~~the~~been ~~TEG~~established ~~carryover~~against net operating ~~loss~~losses ~~may~~where beit ~~substantially~~is ~~limited~~more orlikely ~~eliminated~~than ~~pursuant~~not tothat ~~Internal~~such ~~Revenue~~losses ~~Code~~will ~~Section~~expire ~~382,~~before ~~which~~they isare ~~applicable when there is a change of control~~utilized.

~~The~~At ~~deferred~~February ~~tax~~1, ~~liability~~2015, ~~arose~~the oneffective ~~acquisition~~date of the TEG Acquisition, asTEG ~~book~~had ~~basis~~a ~~exceeds~~net ~~tax~~operating ~~basis~~loss carryover of approximately $16,905,000 available to offset future income for ~~the~~income ~~net~~tax ~~assets~~reporting ~~acquired. As~~purposes, ~~this~~which ~~difference~~will ~~reverses~~expire ~~over~~in ~~time~~various years through 2033, if not previously utilized. However, our ability to use the ~~associated~~TEG ~~deferred~~carryover ~~tax~~net ~~benefit~~operating ~~will~~loss may be ~~recorded~~substantially inlimited ~~the~~or ~~income~~eliminated ~~statement~~pursuant to Internal Revenue Code Section 382, which is applicable when there is a change of control.

The Company knows of no uncertain tax positions and has no unrecognized tax benefits for the six months ended February 28, 2015 or 2014.

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

UNAUDITED

14. FAIR VALUE OF ~~FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS~~MEASUREMENTS

ASC 820 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (exit price). ~~The~~We ~~Company~~utilize ~~utilizes~~ market data or assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs can be readily observable, market corroborated, or generally unobservable. ~~The~~we ~~Company~~classify ~~classifies~~ fair value balances based on the observability of those inputs.

~~The~~Fair ~~following~~Value ~~tables~~Of ~~set~~Financial forth by level within the fair value hierarchy the Company’s financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for at fair value as of February 28, 2015 and August 31, 2014. As required by ASC 820, a financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The Company’s assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value assets and liabilities and their placement within the fair value hierarchy levels. There were no transfers between fair value hierarchy levels for the three or six months ended February 28, 2015 and 2014. Instruments

The ~~carrying~~following ~~amounts~~tables ~~reported~~set inforth by level within the ~~balance~~fair ~~sheets~~value hierarchy our financial assets and liabilities that were accounted for ~~cash,~~at ~~accounts~~fair ~~receivable,~~value ~~loan~~as ~~receivable,~~of ~~accounts~~May ~~payable~~31, 2015 and ~~accrued~~August ~~expenses~~31, ~~and~~2014. As ~~loans~~required ~~and~~by ~~notes~~ASC ~~payable~~820, ~~approximate~~a ~~their~~financial ~~fair~~instrument’s ~~market~~level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the ~~short-term~~lowest ~~maturity~~level of ~~these~~input ~~instruments.~~that ~~Non-financial~~is ~~assets~~significant ~~and~~to ~~liabilities~~the fair value measurement. Our assessment of the ~~Company~~significance ~~measured~~of ata particular input to the fair value ~~include~~measurement ~~long-lived~~requires judgment, and may affect the valuation of fair value assets ~~(e.g.,~~and ~~Oil~~liabilities and ~~Gas~~their ~~properties)~~placement ~~that~~within ~~are~~the ~~impaired~~fair invalue ahierarchy ~~currently~~levels. ~~reported~~There ~~period~~were no transfers between fair value hierarchy levels for the three or nine months ended May 31, 2015 and 2014.

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for cash, accounts receivable, loan receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses, and loans and notes payable, approximate their fair market value based on the short-term maturity of these instruments. The Hawker Note payable to Sefton (see Note 8) is however subject to a potential change in fair value if we estimate in a future reporting period that some or all of it will be cancelled.

The following table presents assets and liabilities that are measured and recognized at fair value on a recurring basis, as of May 31, 2015 and August 31, 2014:

Assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring							Total
basis at May 31, 2015:							Carrying
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Value

Total Assets	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-

Liabilities
Note payable to Sefton	$	-	$	-	$	400,000	$	400,000
Overriding royalty interest liability		-		-		297,705		297,705
Conversion option – long term		-		-		404,568		404,568
Total Liabilities	$	-	$	-	$	1,102,273	$	1,102,273

Assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring							Total
basis at August 31, 2014:							Carrying
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Value

Total Assets	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-

Liabilities
Conversion option – short term	$	-	$	-	$	122,045	$	122,045
Total Liabilities	$	-	$	-	$	122,045	$	122,045

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

UNAUDITED

The following table ~~presents~~provides ~~assets~~a ~~and~~summary ~~liabilities~~of ~~that~~changes ~~are~~in ~~measured~~fair ~~and~~value ~~recognized~~of atour ~~fair~~Level ~~value~~3 onfinancial aliabilities ~~recurring~~for ~~basis,~~the asnine ofmonth ~~February~~period 28ended May 31, 2015 and the year ended August 31, 2014:

Assets and liabilities measured at fair
	Nine Months Ended			Year Ended
value on a recurring									Total
	May 31,			August 31,
basis at February 28, 2015:									Carrying
	2015			2014
	Level 1			Level 2			Level 3		Value
Balance, beginning of period	$	122,045		$	-
Total Assets	$	-		$	-		$	-	$	-
Initial fair value of debt derivatives at note issuances		547,502			139,051
Liabilities
Initial fair value of additional derivative created through interest accrual		22,271			2,630
Overriding royalty interest liability	$	-		$	-		$	274,710	$	274,710
Extinguished derivative liability		(97,398	)		-
Conversion option – long term		-			-			547,886		547,886
Initial fair value of overriding royalty interest liability		263,759			-
Total Liabilities	$	-		$	-		$	822,596	$	822,596
Issuance of note payable to Sefton		400,000			-
Mark-to-market at end of period - embedded debt derivatives		(189,852	)		(19,636	)
Accrual of interest on overriding royalty interest liability, equivalent to estimated change in market value		33,946			-
Balance, end of period	$	1,102,273		$	122,045
Net gain for the period included in earnings as change in fair value	$	189,852		$	19,636

Assets and liabilities measured at fair
value on a recurring							Total
basis at August 31, 2014:							Carrying
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Value
Total Assets	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Liabilities
Conversion option – short term	$	-	$	-	$	122,045	$	122,045
Total Liabilities	$	-	$	-	$	122,045	$	122,045

There was no gain or loss included in earnings for the nine months ended May 31, 2014.

The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial liabilities for the year ended August 31, 2014:

	Six Months Ended			Year Ended
	February 28,			August 31,
	2015			2014
Balance, beginning of period	$	122,045		$	-
Initial fair value of debt derivatives at note issuances		547,502			139,051
Initial fair value of additional derivative created through interest accrual		2,597			2,630
Extinguished derivative liability		(97.398	)		-
Initial fair value of overriding royalty interest liability		263,759			-
Mark-to-market at end of period - embedded debt derivatives		(26,860	)		(19,636	)
Accretion of discount on overriding royalty interest liability, equivalent to estimated change in market value		10,951			-
Balance, end of period	$	822,596		$	122,045
Net gain for the period included in earnings as change in fair value	$	26,860		$	19,636

There was no gain or loss included in earnings for the six months ended February 28, 2013.

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

UNAUDITED

15. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Commitments

Royalties

Oil production from the DEEP Lease is subject to a 1% overriding royalty. Additionally, production is also subject to an aggregate additional 19.92% royalty for total royalties of 20.92%. Revenues are shown net of these royalties.

Oil production from the Tapia and Eureka Assets are subject to overriding royalties totaling approximately 6~~.14~~-7% ~~(based on February 2015 revenue by lease)~~ and 16.67%, respectively. Revenues are shown net of these royalties.

Pursuant to an overriding royalty interest granted to the Secured Convertible Note Payable holder described in Note 9, oil sales from the Tapia ~~oil~~Canyon field are subject to an additional 2.5% or 3.5% overriding royalty interest, depending on the lease. Since this royalty interest was granted in connection with a loan, this royalty interest has been accounted for as a liability (see Note 9).

Operating Agreement

~~Further,~~On on December 1, 2009, SCNRG entered into an Operating Agreement with Caleco, LLC (“Caleco”) for a term equal to the life of the DEEP Lease wells. As the operator, Caleco incurs production and other costs, which are subsequently billed to SCNRG for its share through a joint interest billing process; and the operator distributes to SCNRG its share of revenue received from production, less royalties and NPI obligations. All expenses and revenue presented by the operator represent the pro rata share of the revenue earned and expenses incurred. In accordance with the terms of the agreement, the operator is entitled to a fee for services but has instead elected to bill SCNRG based on actual time and materials. SCNRG increased its working interest in the DEEP Lease from 66.67% to 100.0% during the year ended August 31, 2014; Caleco continues to operate the DEEP Lease on SCNRG’s behalf during a transitional period until SCNRG qualifies with the regulatory agency as an operator.

Common Shares

On October 10, 2014, ~~Hawker~~we authorized an amendment (the “Amendment”) to the Option Agreement pursuant to which ~~Hawker~~we acquired Hawker Energy (Rincon), LLC (“HERLLC”) on January 1, 2014. Under the original terms of the Option Agreement, Messrs. Katic and Moore were entitled to, in the aggregate, up to 33,000,000 additional shares of our common stock upon the consummation of certain potential follow-on acquisition transactions. The Amendment waived all of the follow-on transaction requirements and authorized the immediate issuance to Messrs. Katic and Moore of the full 33,000,000 shares (16,500,000 each). Of those shares, we held 19,000,000 shares in escrow, to be released as follows: (i) 10,000,000 shares upon completion of the acquisition of the assets of TEG, which shares were released from escrow following completion of that acquisition in February 2015 (see Note 4) and (ii) 9,000,000 shares upon completion, on or before December 31, 2017, of any one of the transactions evaluated by HERLLC, our wholly-owned subsidiary, prior to its reorganization with ~~Hawker~~us, including a transaction resulting inour ~~Hawker~~ ownership of oil and gas lease interests in any one of the following unique oil fields:

(a)

Cat Canyon (leases Tognazzini, Wickenden, Los Alamos, GWP, and those immediately adjacent to, in each case, in Santa Barbara County);

(b)

Santa Maria (T 11N, R 36W extending southeast through T9N R33W in Santa Barbara County);

(c)

Casmalia (leases Tompkins, Peshine, and those immediately adjacent to, in each case, in Santa Barbara County);

(d)

North Lost Hills (Sections 12 & 13, T25S, R19E, and Sections 7 & 18, T25S, R 20E, totaling 1,500 acres in Kern County CA);

(e)

Maricopa (McFarland and Jameson leases totaling 40 acres in Kern County);

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

UNAUDITED

(e) Maricopa (McFarland and Jameson leases totaling 40 acres in Kern County);

(f)

Pine Meadows (Section 1 Township 31 South Range 22E in Kern County); or

(g)

Torrance (Joughin and South Torrance Units totaling 900 acres in Los Angeles County).

~~Waiver~~With respect to 14,000,000 shares of our common stock that were issued as a result of the ~~Potential~~Amendment, ~~Follow-On~~an ~~Transaction~~equity ~~requirements~~compensation ~~and~~expense of $1,011,500 recorded in the ~~immediate~~three months ended November 30, 2014, based on the fair value of the shares at the date of issuance. With respect to the 19,000,000 shares of our common stock that were in escrow beginning October 2014, an equity compensation expense of $19,000 was initially recorded in October 2014 based on the ~~remaining~~par value of the shares at the date of issuance. Total expense of $1,030,500 was ~~done~~recorded toin ~~simplify~~the three months ended November 30, 2014. On release of 10,000,000 shares of our common ~~shareholding~~stock ~~structure~~in ~~and~~February ~~share~~2015 ~~count~~as ~~and~~described above, an additional expense of $670,090 was recorded, bringing the fiscal year-to-date ~~assist~~expense to $1,700,590 at that date. No such expense was recorded in the three months ended May 31, 2015. As and when further shares are subsequently released from escrow, a further expense will be recorded based on the fair value of the 9,000,000 shares (less amounts previously expensed based on par value) concurrently with consummation of the applicable follow-on transaction. None of these amounts are considered for accounting purposes to be incremental consideration for our ~~capital~~acquisition ~~raising~~of ~~efforts~~HERLLC.

With respect to 14,000,000 shares of our common stock that were issued as a result of the Amendment, an equity compensation expense of $1,011,500 recorded in the three months ended November 30, 2014, based on the fair value of the shares at the date of issuance. With respect to the 19,000,000 shares of our common stock that are in escrow, an equity compensation expense of $19,000 was initially recorded in October 2014 based on the par value of the shares at the date of issuance. Total expense of $1,030,500 was recorded in the three months ended November 30, 2014. On release of 10,000,000 shares of our common stock in February 2015 as described above, an additional expense of $670,090 was recorded, bringing the fiscal year-to-date expense to $1,700,590. As and when further shares are subsequently released from escrow, a further expense will be recorded based on the fair value of the 9,000,000 shares (less amounts previously expensed based on par value) concurrently with consummation of the applicable follow-on transaction. None of these amounts are considered for accounting purposes to be incremental consideration for our acquisition of HERLLC.

Contingencies

As of ~~February~~May 2831, 2015 and August 31, 2014, there were no known environmental or other regulatory matters related to our operations that were reasonably expected to result in a material liability to us. We are subject to various federal, state and local laws and regulations relating to discharge of materials into, and protection of, the environment. These laws and regulations may, among other things, impose liability on the owners for the cost of pollution cleanup resulting from operations and subject the owners to liability for pollution damages. In some instances, the operator may be directed to suspend or cease operations in the affected area.

16. EQUITY

Common Stock

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015:

We issued an aggregate of 500,000 “Units” to three investors in consideration of an aggregate of $50,000 in cash received prior to August 31, 2014, and shown as common stock payable as of August 31, 2014.

In addition, we issued an aggregate of 1,150,000 Units to two investors for $115,000.

No commissions were paid or payable. Other transaction costs were $80. The price of each Unit was $0.10. Each Unit comprised one share of our common stock, together with a warrant to acquire an additional one-half share of our common stock on payment of $0.20 per share. The warrants expire five years from each closing date.

In addition, during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, we issued:

· 1,~~305~~364,~~700~~945 shares on conversion of $~~130~~136,~~569~~494 in accounts and bonus payable into common stock.

33,000,000 shares pursuant to the HERLLC Amendment described in Note 15.

~~Shares~~· ~~and~~3,247,658 ~~warrants~~shares ~~issued~~on inconversion ~~the~~of ~~TEG~~$324,766 ~~Acquisition~~of ~~are~~notes ~~set~~payable, ~~out~~including inaccrued ~~Note~~interest, ~~4. See~~required ~~also~~pursuant ~~Note~~to ~~18,~~their ~~Subsequent~~terms ~~Events~~following the closing of the TEG Acquisition.

A net 1,500,000 shares to Sefton to acquire the stock of TEG, as described in Note 4.

800,000 shares as payment for investor relations services.

In addition, 510,000 shares are payable at May 31, 2015 for interest on notes payable as described in Note 9.

Related party transactions are set forth in Note 17.

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

UNAUDITED

Shares Of Common Stock Potentially Issuable Pursuant To Warrants, Convertible Notes Payable And Options

Pursuant to warrants issued in our private placements of securities from January 10, 2014 through ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, up to 6,584,210 shares of our common stock would be issuable upon payment to us of $0.20 per share. The warrants expire five years from the date of each private placement.

Pursuant to warrants issued in February 2015 on conversion of notes payable into units of common stock and warrants on closing of the TEG acquisition, up to 1,623,829 shares of our common stock would be issuable upon payment to us of $0.25 per share. The warrants expire February 3, 2020.

Up to 9,~~847~~711,~~290~~919 shares of common stock could be issued pursuant to the convertible notes payable described in Notes 8 and 9, if investors elect to convert some or all of their principal and interest, with the number of shares issuable on conversion computed at a rate of $0.10 per share.

Pursuant to the March 25, 2015 note payable, up to 500,000 shares of common stock could be issued pursuant to the associated five-year warrant upon payment to us of $0.25 per share.

On May 14, 2014, 5,950,000 common stock options were issued to our officers and other key consultants.

· Each option has a life of 10 years and a strike price of $0.10 per share. ~~One~~1,000,000 ~~million~~ stock options vested on December 15, 2014, with the balance of 4,950,000 stock options vesting one-third on each of May 13, 2015, 2016 and 2017. There are no other options outstanding.

· All options other than a ~~one~~1,000,000 ~~million~~ share option grant were granted pursuant to the 2014 Stock Plan approved by written consent of a majority of our stockholders on March 18, 2014, which authorized 15% of our outstanding shares of common stock to be available for grant in the form of options or stock purchase rights. At ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, 15% of our outstanding common stock is 12,019,560 shares, of which we have granted 4,950,000 stock options as stated above. ~~One~~1,000,000 ~~million~~ stock options were granted outside of the 2014 Stock Plan.

The fair value of each stock option award was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing method. Compensation costs related to the options granted are recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period. The expected life assumption was 10 years, the same as the contract life, as we do not have historical data upon which to base an expected term assumption. No forfeitures were assumed, as we have no historical data. Expected volatility was based on historical volatility of our common stock. The risk-free interest rate was derived from the U.S. Treasury yields in effect at the time of grant and the dividend yield was zero, based on historical experience and expected future changes.

· Equity compensation expense relating to stock options was $3328,~~283~~468 and $90119,~~962~~430 for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015. There was no$14,999 of equity compensation expense for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2014.

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

UNAUDITED

The following is a summary of ~~the~~our ~~Company’s~~ stock option activity.

					Weighted-
			Weighted-		Average
			Average		Remaining		Aggregate
			Exercise		Contractual		Intrinsic
	Options		Price		Life (Years)		Value
Outstanding at August 31, 2014		5,950,000	$	0.10		9.7	$	410,632
Granted		-		-		-		-
Exercised		-		-		-		-
Forfeited		-		-		-		-
Outstanding at February 28, 2015		5,950,000	$	0.10		9.1	$	410,632
Outstanding at May 31, 2015		5,950,000	$	0.10		9.0	$	410,632
Vested and exercisable at February 28, 2015		1,000,000	$	0.10		9.1	$	69,014
Vested and exercisable at May 31, 2015		1,000,000	$	0.10		9.0	$	69,014

As of ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, there were 4,950,000 unvested stock options and unrecognized stock option expense of $~~251~~222,~~000~~442, which is expected to be recognized over 2.20 years. The following table summarizes the information about stock options outstanding and exercisable at ~~February~~May 2831, 2015.

Options Outstanding

Options Exercisable

Weighted-

Weighted

Average

Number of

Remaining

Exercise

Number of

Exercise

Life (Years)

Price

5,950,000

9.10

0.10

1,000,000

0.10

Non-Controlling Interest

We report in these unaudited interim financial statements non-controlling interest in Tapia Holdings pursuant to paragraph ASC No. 810-10-65-1. The non-controlling interest of $145,000 reported on the balance sheet as of ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, represents the non-controlling interest holders' proportionate share of the equity of the Tapia Holdings.

The final form of acquisition of TEG was ~~Hawker~~our acquiring 100% of the stock of TEG, rather than an earlier proposed structure of Tapia Holdings acquiring an 80% membership interest in a newly-formed LLC which would hold the TEG Assets. As a result of the transaction structure changing, Tapia Holdings no longer holds any assets and it is expected that the non-controlling interest in Tapia Holdings will be restructured in the near term, the form of which has not yet been agreed.

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

UNAUDITED

17. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The following information sets forth related party transactions, being transactions with:

· Mr. Kristian Andresen is a director ~~of Hawker~~ and a significant shareholder. Until October 25, 2013, he was also our CEO, and from October 25, 2013, until July 17, 2014, he was ~~Secretary~~our ~~of Hawker~~Secretary. Mr. Andresen has been actively providing services to ~~Hawker~~us since October 25, 2013.

· Mr. Darren Katic is a director and our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer ~~of Hawker~~. He was a member of SCNRG, which we acquired on October 25, 2013, and at which point Mr. Katic became a director, officer and a significant shareholder of Hawker.

· Manhattan Holdings, LLC (“Manhattan”) was a member of SCNRG, which ~~Hawker~~we acquired on October 25, 2013, at which point Manhattan became a significant shareholder of Hawker.

· Mr. Charles Moore was a managing member of HERLLC until ~~Hawker~~we acquired his interest on January 1, 2014, at which point he became a significant shareholder ~~of Hawker~~. Mr. Moore has been actively providing services to ~~Hawker~~us since that date.

· Mr. Gerald Tywoniuk was a member of SCNRG, which ~~Hawker~~we acquired on October 25, 2013, at which point he became a significant shareholder ~~of Hawker~~. Mr. Tywoniuk has been actively providing services to ~~Hawker~~us since that date.

HERLLC

On January 1, 2014, ~~Hawker~~ we exercised ~~its~~our option to acquire all of the membership interests in HERLLC from Mr. Katic and Mr. Moore (collectively the “HERLLC Sellers”), as described in Note 15. ~~Hawker~~We issued 3,000,000 shares of our common to the HERLLC Sellers as consideration for the acquisition, 1,500,000 shares to each HERLLC Seller. ~~Hawker~~We also assumed net liabilities of $135,199, including $29,625 owing to Mr. Katic.

The HERLLC option was originally entered into ~~with Hawker~~ on October 15, 2013 and amended on November 20, 2013 to (a) extend the term of the option, (b) revise the option consideration payable upon consummation of certain transactions described in the Agreement and (c) provide for additional option consideration in the event of the consummation of certain transactions not previously contemplated by the parties. On October 10, 2014, ~~the~~our Board ~~of Hawker~~ waived all of the follow-on transaction requirements and authorized the immediate issuance to Messrs. Katic and Moore of 33,000,000 shares (16,500,000 each). Of those shares, as of ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, we hold 9,000,000 shares in escrow, to be released in accordance with the provisions described in Note 15.

Loan Payable To Related Parties, Short Term

The components of $~~470~~598,~~429~~956 of loans payable to related parties, short term, are disclosed in Note 7. Interest expense on such loans was $912,~~447~~734 and $1628,~~227~~254, respectively, for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015 and $0 for the same period in 2014. During the three and nine months ended May 31, 2015, $156,500 and $390,300 of additional loans from related parties were made to us, and $40,000 and $50,000 were repaid, respectively.

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND ~~SIX~~NINE MONTHS ENDED ~~FEBRUARY~~MAY 2831, 2015

UNAUDITED

Loans Payable To Related Parties, Long Term

SCNRG received various loans from its former members from its inception totaling $89,833 as of August 31, 2013: Mr. Katic ($38,500), Manhattan ($38,500) and Mr. Tywoniuk ($12,833). Each loan was originally unsecured, non-interest bearing and due on demand. On September 18, 2013, each loan was formalized through the issuance of an amended and restated promissory note to each former member. The amended and restated promissory notes were unsecured, bore interest at a rate of 1.66% per annum and matured no later than September 18, 2018. The unpaid principal and interest were payable upon the earlier of their maturity or upon the issuance of new debt or equity securities in a transaction or series of transactions resulting in aggregate gross proceeds ~~to Hawker~~ of a minimum of $5 million. ~~Hawker~~We assumed these loans payable upon ~~its~~our acquisition of SCNRG on October 25, 2013. On April 9, 2014, the related parties agreed to convert the short- and long-term loans payable to related parties into common stock and warrants on the same terms as the unit offering described in Note 16.

Interest expense on such loans was $0 for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015 and $~~368~~115 and $~~739~~854 for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2014 respectively.

Convertible Notes Payable

From July 17, 2015 until February 3, 2015, pursuant to a convertible note payable, we owed a relative of Mr. Darren Katic, $100,000 plus accrued interest, all as described in Note 8. As a result of the TEG Acquisition, this convertible note payable converted into Conversion Units.

Interest expense on this convertible note payable was $~~2,104~~0 and $5,096, respectively, for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015.

Note Payable

See Note 9 for a description of a note payable to a relative of Mr. Katic, including payment of interest in shares and a warrant.

Unit Issuances

As part of the common stock payable amounts outstanding on August 31, 2014 as described in Note 15, $20,000 was received from each of Messrs. Katic and Tywoniuk, for which 200,000 Units were issued to each during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015. The price of each Unit was $0.10. Each Unit was comprised of one share of our common stock, together with a warrant to acquire an additional one-half share of our common stock on payment of $0.20 per share. The warrants expire five years from the closing date.

Other

A portion of the non-controlling interest in Tapia Holdings is held by Mr. Moore, being $45,000 out of the $145,000 of capital received. See Note 16.

On behalf of a company controlled by Mr. Katic, ~~the~~we ~~Company~~have ~~has~~ been paying rent to a third party for its office space, beginning January 1, 2014. No formal assumption agreement ~~has~~had been completed to assign the leases with the landlord from Mr. Katic’s company to ~~Hawker~~us. Mr. Katic had provided a personal guarantee to the landlord. For the three month period and ~~six~~nine ~~months~~month period ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, these payments totaled $9,~~617~~798 and $1929,~~233~~031 respectively. Effective June 1, 2015, we entered into a new lease with the landlord in our own name.

On March 1, 2015, Mr. Tywoniuk began charging us $15,000 per month for accounting consulting services, of which $15,000 had been paid by May 31, 2015.

HAWKER ENERGY, INC.

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

THREE AND NINE MONTHS ENDED MAY 31, 2015

UNAUDITED

18. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

AsOn aJune ~~result~~10, ~~of our acquisition of TEG~~2015, TEG issold noan ~~longer~~easement ~~affiliated~~underlying ~~with Sefton or TEGMC and, accordingly, Sefton and TEGMC requested that BOTW release them from any further liability under the Credit Agreement as Borrowers. On March 18, 2015, we entered into~~ a ~~Sixth~~third-party ~~Amendment~~owned tocell ~~Forbearance~~tower ~~Agreement~~on ~~(“Sixth~~its ~~Amendment”)~~Tapia ~~among~~Canyon ~~Sefton,~~oil ~~TEG,~~field ~~TEGMC~~property, ~~Hawker~~ and ~~BOTW.~~assigned ~~Under~~ the ~~Sixth~~associated ~~Amendment,~~rental BOTW released Sefton and TEGMC from all of their respective obligations under the Credit Agreement (other than any surviving obligations in respect of indemnification) and removed Sefton and TEGMC as Borrowers under the Credit Agreementcontract. Gross Asproceeds ~~and~~were ~~in consideration of that release, BOTW (i) was paid~~ $~~400~~175,000. After bydeducting ~~Sefton,~~property ~~which~~tax ~~was~~payments ~~applied against the amount outstanding under the loan from BOTW to TEG,~~ and ~~(ii) received~~prorated ~~a Collateral Assignment of Note~~rent, ~~executed~~net byproceeds ~~Sefton in favor~~ of ~~BOTW and acknowledged and agreed to by Hawker, collaterally assigning to BOTW a Promissory Note dated March 18, 2015 in the principal amount of~~ $~~400~~157,~~000,~~792 ~~issued~~were byused ~~Hawker in favor of Sefton (the “Hawker Note”). In addition, under the terms of the Sixth Amendment, Sefton agreed~~ to ~~return~~pay todown ~~Hawker for cancellation (a) its Warrant to purchase up to an additional 5,000,000 shares of our common stock for $0.25 per share (which was issued as part of our acquisition of~~ TEG), and (b) 1,500,000 shares of our common stock. The Hawker Note bears simple interest at the rate of 6% per annum and is due on the earlier to occur of (i) March 18, 2018, or (ii) expiration of certain of BOTW’s ~~covenants to forbear in exercising its rights under the Credit Agreement. Upon payment in full of the~~ loan ~~obligations~~ to BOTW~~, the Hawker Note will be returned to Hawker for cancellation~~.

On January 16, 2015, a relative of Mr. Katic advanced $50,000 to Hawker, and made further advances of $20,000 on March 19, 2015, and $100,000 on March 25, 2015, all of which were documented in a note payable on the latter date. See Note 9 for a complete description.

On June 10, 2015, TEG sold an easement underlying a third-party owned cell tower on its Tapia Canyon oil field property, and assigned the associated rental contract. Gross proceeds were $175,000. After deducting property tax payments and prorated rent, net proceeds of $157,792 were used to pay down the loan to BOTW.

Item 2

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

The following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and plan of operations should be read in conjunction with our unaudited interim financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Various statements have been made herein that may constitute “forward-looking statements”. Forward-looking statements may also be made in the Company’s other reports filed with or furnished to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and in other documents. In addition, the Company through its management may make oral forward-looking statements.

Forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from such statements. The words “believe,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “optimistic,” “intend,” “plan,” “aim,” “will,” “may,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “likely,” “hope” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and, therefore, you should not put undue reliance upon them. Some of the statements that are forward-looking include: our ability to successfully implement our business plan; our ability to ~~finance~~refinance ~~and~~our ~~consummate~~existing ~~contemplated transactions~~debt; our estimates of revenues and of other expenses associated with our operations; our ability to explore and develop our properties; our reserve estimates; and our ability to generate sufficient cash flows and maintain adequate sources of liquidity to finance our ongoing operations and capital expenditures. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements.

Organizational History and Overview

Hawker Energy, Inc. was incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada on June 12, 2006, under the name of Uventus Technologies Corp. On September 23, 2009, we merged with our wholly owned subsidiary and changed our name to Sara Creek Gold Corp. Subsequently, on September 29, 2014, we changed our name to Hawker Energy, Inc. (“we”, “our”, “us”, “Hawker”, or “the Company”).

We are ~~now~~ in the oil and gas exploitation and production business and our goal is to acquire and develop mature leases, interests and other rights to oil and gas producing properties with proven undeveloped potential.

Our recent history is as follows:

We were a public shell company until July 18, 2013.

On October 25, 2013, we acquired SCNRG, LLC (“SCNRG”), an entity that owned a 66.67% working interest in the DEEP Lease in California (we increased our ownership to 100% subsequently). Mr. Darren Katic, a managing member of SCNRG, became a director, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of Hawker, and a significant shareholder of Hawker, upon our acquisition of SCNRG.

· On January 1, 2014, we acquired all of the membership interests in Hawker Energy, LLC, an entity owned by Mr. Katic and Mr. Charles Moore (“HERLLC Sellers”). Hawker Energy, LLC changed its name to Hawker Energy (Rincon), LLC (“HERLLC”) on October 22, 2014. HERLLC, through its wholly-owned subsidiary Punta Gorda Resources, LLC (“Punta Gorda”), claims oil production and development rights of coastal lease PRC 145.1 just offshore Ventura County in the Rincon Field and ownership rights to an associated on-shore drilling and production site, which rights are being challenged in court by the lease’s operator of record (see Part II, Item 1, “Legal Proceedings”). HERLLC had also engaged in preliminary discussions with various third parties concerning potential acquisitions.

· OnEffective February 31, 2015, we ~~completed~~acquired ~~the acquisition of~~ all of the outstanding ~~common~~capital stock of TEG Oil & Gas U.S.A., Inc. (“TEG”) from Sefton Resources, Inc. (“Sefton”) (the “TEG Acquisition”). TEG is ~~an energy company~~ focused on exploitation and production of crude oil in Southern California. TEG’s assets comprise four oil and gas leases encompassing the Tapia Canyon field (the “Tapia Assets”), ~~and~~ one lease west of the Tapia Canyon field (the “Eureka Assets”), and the accompanying production equipment. ~~The~~These Tapia Assets located 40 miles north of Los Angeles, California, consist of four oil leases covering 262 gross acres. The Eureka oil field covers an area of approximately 1,510 gross acres located 25 miles west of the Tapia Canyon oil field in Ventura County, California. The acquisition ~~significantly~~is ~~expanded~~described ~~our presence~~ in ~~Southern~~further ~~California.~~detail ~~See “Recent Business Developments”~~ below.

· During the three months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, we raised $~~543~~324,~~800~~618 as follows: $~~250~~116,500 of additional loans from related parties, net of $40,000 in repayments, $120,000 from a ~~new~~long ~~convertible~~term ~~notes~~note payable, and $~~128~~88,~~800~~118 ofin ~~additional~~other ~~loans~~debt. ~~from~~In ~~related parties~~addition, there was $~~115~~400,000 ~~through~~paid ~~the~~down ~~sale~~on ofTEG’s ~~additional~~bank ~~common~~loan, ~~stock~~pursuant ~~and~~to ~~warrant~~a ~~units~~deal with Sefton and ~~$50,000~~TEG’s ~~from~~lenders aas ~~long~~more ~~term~~fully ~~note~~described ~~payable~~below.

·Our ~~Finally,~~consolidated ~~during~~financial ~~the~~statements, ~~three~~including ~~months~~our ~~ended~~wholly-owned ~~February~~subsidiaries 28SCNRG, ~~2015:~~HERLLC, ~~creditors~~Punta ~~converted~~Gorda ~~$130~~and Tapia Holdings,~~569~~ consist of ~~amounts~~SCNRG’s ~~payable~~historical ~~into~~results ~~common~~consolidated ~~stock;~~with ~~and~~our onresults ~~closing~~beginning October 25, 2013, as a result of SCNRG being considered the ~~TEG~~acquirer ~~Acquisition,~~for ~~$324~~accounting purposes,~~766~~ intogether ~~notes~~with ~~payable~~HERLLC’s ~~automatically~~(and ~~pursuant~~its tosubsidiary ~~their~~Punta ~~terms~~Gorda’s) ~~converted~~results ~~into~~commencing ~~common~~with ~~stock~~its acquisition on January 1, 2014, and ~~warrant~~TEG’s ~~units~~results beginning with its acquisition effective February 1, 2015.

These events are described in more detail below.

Recent Business Developments

Purchase all of the outstanding shares of capital stock of TEG

On January 12, 2015, we entered into a Share Purchase Agreement with Sefton pursuant to which we agreed to purchase, and Sefton agreed to sell, 100% of the issued and outstanding shares of capital stock of Sefton’s wholly-owned subsidiary, TEG. The purchase price iswas $1.00 in cash plus the issuance of 3,000,000 shares of our common stock and a five-year warrant to purchase up to an additional 5,000,000 shares of our common stock for $0.25 per share (the “Warrant”).

Between April 18, 2014 and February 3, 2015, we and our wholly-owned subsidiary, Tapia Holdings, made a number of advances to TEG, pursuant to several secured subordinated notes and related security agreements, all as amended and restated into a Secured Subordinated Note dated January 12, 2015 (the “Note”), and a Fourth Amended and Restated Security Agreement dated January 12, 2015, each executed by TEG, and a Limited Recourse Guarantee (“Guarantee”) and a Pledge Agreement, each executed by Sefton (collectively, the “Loan Receivable Agreements”). These advances totaled approximately $1.6 million. This amount constitutes additional consideration for the acquisition, as this loan receivable was not settled prior to the closing of our acquisition of TEG.

TEG’s secured lender, Bank of the West (“BOTW”) consented to our acquisition of TEG and agreed to forbear taking enforcement action against TEG on the senior loan provided that (i) Hawker lend TEG not less than $350,000 by March 31, 2015, (ii) interest on TEG's obligations to BOTW be increased to 9%, with a monthly pay rate of 5% and the remaining deferred 4% of unpaid interest compounded monthly beginning January 1, 2015, (iii) the proceeds of any sale, assignment, licensing or other transfer of any real or personal property rights which serve as collateral for TEG's obligations to BOTW be remitted directly to BOTW, and (iv) commencing no later than the first month after which the California Midway-Sunset First Purchase Price as published by the U.S. Energy Information Administration exceeds $60 per barrel, TEG will begin making outstanding property tax payments to the County of Los Angeles of at least $15,000 per month.

OnEffective ~~February 3, 2015 (but effective~~ as of February 1, 2015), we completed the acquisition of all of the outstanding common stock of TEG.

On March 18, 2015, Sefton made a principal payment to BOTW in the amount of $400,000 in order for it and a subsidiary to be released as co-borrowers under BOTW’s loan to TEG. Concurrently, Sefton agreed to return to Hawker for cancellation (a) ~~its~~the Warrant ~~to purchase up to an additional 5,000,000 shares of our common stock for $0.25 per share,~~ and (b) 1,500,000 shares of our common stock. Finally, Hawker issued the “Hawker Note” in the principal amount of $400,000 to Sefton. The Hawker Note bears simple interest at the rate of 6% per annum and is due on the earlier to occur of (i) March 18, 2018, or (ii) expiration of certain of BOTW’s covenants to forbear in exercising its rights under the Credit Agreement. Upon payment in full of TEG’s loan obligations to BOTW, the Hawker Note will be returned to Hawker for cancellation.

Description of Tapia Assets

The Tapia Canyon field covers ~~an area of~~ approximately 262 acres located about 40 miles north of ~~the~~ Los Angeles, California ~~metropolitan area~~. The Tapia Canyon field was discovered in 1957, when the Yule No. 2 well tested at 120 barrels per day of 18-degree API oil. The Tapia Canyon field commenced production in August 1957. ~~The~~Oil sales from the Tapia Assets ~~produced~~were 6355 barrels of oil per day (net) in ~~February~~the quarter ended May 31, 2015, produced from 17 wells at a reservoir depth of just over 1,000 feet. The Tapia Assets benefit from relatively low royalty burdens, which average approximately six to seven percent. Production is from the Yule reservoir, which is, on average, greater than 100 feet thick over the majority of the oil field, and comprised of sand and silts.

A small steam generator was built for testing purposes in 2007 and has completed 31 steam injection cycles of various sizes to assist in field modeling. The prior field operator confirmed the value of thermal EOR (enhanced oil recovery) at the Tapia Canyon field. During the last full-time cyclic steam test in October 2013, production reached 170 barrels of oil per day (gross). Extensive infrastructure exists currently in the field to facilitate steaming operations going forward, and for oil gathering and storage purposes.

Description of Eureka Assets

The Eureka Assets cover an area of approximately 1,510 acres located about 25 miles west of the Tapia Canyon field in Ventura County, California. The Eureka Assets produced and sold four barrels of oil per day (net) in ~~February~~the quarter ended May 31, 2015.

All acreage and well information described for the Tapia Assets and Eureka Assets above are gross figures.

Reserve information

The following table summarizes TEG’s share of the estimated quantities of proved reserves as of December 31, 2014 based on $92.28 per barrel of oil, which represents the unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the month oil prices (being Plains Marketing LP Midway Sunset posting, less contracted differential and average gravity adjustment realized by TEG) during the twelve-month period prior to December 31, 2014. For further information on TEG’s reserves, see our Current Report on Form 8-K/A filed with the SEC on June 19, 2015.

Summary of Estimated Proved Oil Reserves

as of December 31, 2014

Proved Reserves Category	Net Barrels		PV10 (before tax)
Proved, Developed Producing		239,243		$	5,982,215
Proved, Developed Non-Producing		1,031,038			26,635,225
Proved, Undeveloped		2,074,515			51,527,443
Total Proved		3,344,796		$	84,144,883

The total PV10 (present value) of TEG’s proved reserves as of December 31, 2014 was approximately $84.1 million. “PV10” means the estimated future gross revenue to be generated from the production of proved reserves, net of estimated production and future development and abandonment costs, using prices and costs in effect at the determination date, before income taxes, and without giving effect to non-property related expenses, discounted to a present value using an annual discount rate of 10% in accordance with the guidelines of the SEC. PV10 is a non-GAAP financial measure and generally differs from the standardized measure of discounted future net cash flows, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, because it does not include the effects of income taxes on future net revenues.

~~Convertible~~Uncertainties ~~Note~~are ~~Payable~~inherent in estimating quantities of proved reserves, ~~Long~~including ~~Term~~many factors beyond our control. Reserve engineering is a subjective process of estimating subsurface accumulations of oil that cannot be measured in an exact manner, and the accuracy of any reserves estimate is a function of the quality of available data and its interpretation. As a result, estimates by different engineers often vary, sometimes significantly. In addition, physical factors such as the results of drilling, testing, and production subsequent to the date of an estimate, as well as economic factors such as changes in product prices or development and production expenses, may require revision of such estimates. Accordingly, oil quantities ultimately recovered will vary from reserves estimates.

OnNeither ~~January 14, 2015,~~ we ~~executed~~nor aTEG ~~term~~filed ~~sheet~~any toestimates ~~provide~~of ~~for~~total aproved ~~Third~~net ~~Amended~~oil ~~and~~reserves ~~Restated~~for ~~Secured~~TEG ~~Convertible~~with, ~~Promissory~~or ~~Note~~included tosuch aninformation ~~outside investor (the “Secured Convertible Note Payable”),~~ in ~~the~~reports ~~aggregate principal amount of $1~~to,~~000,000,~~ toany ~~mature~~federal inauthority ~~two~~or ~~years. Completion~~agency ofduring ~~definitive~~the ~~documentation~~twelve ~~occurred~~months onended ~~May~~December 2731, ~~2015~~2014.

ADrop ~~Secured Convertible Note Payable was issued~~ in ~~consideration~~Oil of additional proceeds to us in the amount of $250,000 (of which $200,000 was funded January 15, 2015, and $50,000 was funded February 26, 2015) and cancellation of previously issued notes to the investor in the amounts of $250,000, $350,000, and $25,000 (as well as accrued interest on each), the first two of which had maturity dates of November 30, 2014, and the latter of which had a maturity date of May 3, 2015. The holder has the option of advancing a further $125,000 by June 30, 2015. The maturity date of the note is December 31, 2016. The Secured Convertible Note Payable bears interest on the unpaid principal balance of the Secured Convertible Note Payable at the rate of 12% per annum. Interest payments become payable quarterly beginning July 31, 2015, accruing interest until then. The Secured Convertible Note Payable will be convertible at any time at the option of the investor into shares of Hawker common stock computed by dividing all of the then outstanding principal and accrued interest under the Secured Convertible Note Payable by $0.10 (as appropriately adjusted for any stock splits, stock combinations or similar events) (the “Conversion Rate”). However, if we subsequently sell common shares or securities convertible into or exchangeable or excercisable for a price lower than the Conversion Rate (subject to customary exclusions), then the Conversion Rate then in effect will be automatically reduced to the lower price. We will at all times reserve and keep available out of our authorized but unissued shares a sufficient number of shares of common stock to give effect to the conversion of the Secured Convertible Note Payable. Unless notified in advance by the investor, conversion of a part or the entire Secured Convertible Note Payable is limited at any one time to a maximum beneficial ownership interest in Hawker of 4.99% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to the conversion. The proceeds from the Secured Convertible Note Payable are to be used for the purpose of allowing us to make advances to TEG, under the terms of a note receivable from TEG, and for general working capital. Any repayment by TEG of the advances under the terms of the note receivable must be used by us to immediately make repayment to the investor under the terms of the Secured Convertible Note Payable. To secure our obligations under the Secured Convertible Note Payable, we granted a security interest to the investor in all of our right, title and interest under the TEG note receivable, our second priority security interest in TEG’s assets and in the interest of our subsidiary SCNRG, LLC in the oil-producing property known as the DEEP Lease. The Secured Convertible Note Payable also contains other terms and covenants that are customary for a promissory note of this type. In addition, we granted to the investor, retroactive to January 15, 2015, a 2.5% or 3.5% overriding royalty interest, depending on the lease, in oil sales from the TEG Assets. Such amount accrues until TEG’s lender, BOTW, has been paid in full; however, payment of royalties shall begin by January 31, 2016 or an event of default under the Secured Convertible Note Payable will occur. While interest and royalties are being accrued, no cash payments can be made to repay loans made to Hawker by Mr. Katic, nor can Hawker repurchase any non-controlling interest owned by Mr. Moore nor pay any salaries to Messrs. Katic and Moore.Prices

~~Sale~~TEG’s ofrevenues, ~~common~~operating ~~stock~~results, profitability, future rate of growth and ~~warrant~~its ~~units~~carrying value depend primarily upon the prevailing prices for oil. Historically, ~~convertible~~oil ~~notes~~prices ~~payable~~have been volatile and ~~other~~are ~~financings~~subject to fluctuations in response to changes in supply and demand, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors.

During the ~~three~~second ~~months~~half ~~ended~~of ~~February~~2014 ~~28,~~oil ~~2015~~prices declined steeply, and low prices have continued in ~~addition~~2015. toIf prices remain at or near current levels for the ~~$250~~rest of 2015,~~000~~ ~~Secured~~or ~~Convertible~~if ~~Note~~they ~~Payable~~decline ~~proceeds~~further, ~~described~~the ~~above~~prices used to determine our August 31, we2015 ~~closed~~fiscal ~~private~~year ~~placements~~end ~~for~~reserves anwill ~~aggregate~~be ofsignificantly ~~1,150,000~~lower ~~units~~than ~~for~~those ~~gross~~used ~~proceeds~~for ofDecember ~~$115~~31,~~000. The~~ ~~price~~2014, ofas ~~each~~mandated ~~unit~~by ~~was~~SEC $0regulations.~~10. Each~~ ~~unit~~Under isthese ~~comprised~~circumstances, ofwe ~~one~~will ~~share~~experience ofsignificant negative price-related revisions to our ~~common~~proved ~~stock~~reserves at August 31, ~~together~~2015. ~~with~~For example, under a ~~warrant~~much tolower ~~acquire~~price anscenario ~~additional~~used ~~one-half~~for ~~share~~reserves reporting purposes, a portion of our ~~common~~proved ~~stock~~undeveloped atreserves $0may no longer meet the economic producibility criteria under the rules.20 Similarly, substantial costs of operation are fixed, having the effect of increasing costs on a per ~~share. The~~barrel ~~warrants~~basis ~~expire~~in ~~five~~later years ~~from~~as ~~each~~production ~~closing~~declines, ~~date.~~rendering ~~Net~~them ~~proceeds~~uneconomic ~~were~~in ~~$115,000~~a lower price environment.

~~Also~~In ~~during~~addition, we review the ~~three~~carrying ~~months~~value ~~ended~~of ~~February~~our 28oil properties under the full-cost accounting rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on a quarterly basis. This quarterly review is referred to as a ceiling test. Under the ceiling test, ~~2015~~capitalized costs, weless ~~raised~~accumulated ~~$128~~amortization and related deferred income taxes,~~800~~ ~~from~~may ~~additional~~not ~~loans from~~exceed an amount equal to the sum of the present value of estimated future net revenues (adjusted for cash flow hedges) less estimated future expenditures to be incurred in developing and producing the proved reserves, less any related ~~parties~~income tax effects (“PV-10”). In calculating future net revenues, the SEC requires us to use a 12-month average historical price with no provision for price and ~~$50,000~~cost ~~from~~escalations in future years except by contractual arrangements. Revisions to estimates of oil reserves and/or an increase or decrease in prices can have a ~~long~~material ~~term~~impact ~~note~~on ~~payable~~the present value of estimated future net revenues. Any excess of the net book value, less deferred income taxes, is generally written off as an expense.

~~Total~~Overriding ~~funds~~Royalty ~~raised~~Interest ~~during the three months ended February 28, 2015 were $543,800.~~Liability

Pursuant to an overriding royalty interest (“ORRI”) granted in January 2015 to a secured convertible note payable holder, oil sales from the Tapia Canyon field are subject to an additional 2.5% or 3.5% overriding royalty interest, depending on the lease. Since this royalty interest was granted in connection with a loan, the loan proceeds were bifurcated and this royalty interest has been accounted for as a separate liability. This ORRI is not accounted for as a revenue reduction, nor an operating expense or reserve deduction, rather the ORRI is accounted for as debt.

Finally, during the three months ended February 28, 2015: creditors converted $130,569 of amounts payable into Units as described above; and on closing of the TEG Acquisition, $324,766 in notes payable automatically pursuant to their terms converted into units at a rate of 10 cents per unit, with each unit consisting of one share of common stock together with a five-year warrant to acquire one-half share of common stock for $0.25 per share.

Included in the above financings are various related party transactions as set forth in Note 17 to the unaudited interim financial statements included elsewhere in this report. See also Notes 7, 8 and 9 for further descriptions of loans payable to related parties, convertible notes payable (short term) and long term debt.

Results of Operations

The following discussion of the financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report. This discussion should not be construed to imply that the results discussed herein will necessarily continue into the future, or that any conclusion reached herein will necessarily be indicative of actual operating results in the future.

As noted above, as a result of completion of our acquisition of SCNRG, ~~the~~our condensed consolidated financial statements ~~of Hawker, including SCNRG,~~ consist of SCNRG’s historical results consolidated with ~~Hawker’s~~our results beginning October 25, 2013.

In addition, on January 1, 2014, we acquired all of the membership interests of HERLLC, and its wholly-owned subsidiary Punta Gorda Resources, LLC, and our condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of these entities beginning January 1, 2014. SCNRG increased its working interest in the oil-producing property known as the DEEP Lease from 66.67% to 87.18% on February 1, 2014, and to 100.0% on May 15, 2014. Finally, we acquired 100% of the stock of TEG effective February 1, 2015. Results of these acquisitions are included from the dates of acquisitions.

Three months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015 and 2014

Net loss ~~attributable to the Company~~ of $1726,~~410,766~~629 for the three months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, ~~was largely the result of~~includes: (1) ~~being~~ a ~~development~~TEG ~~stage~~operating ~~oil~~loss ~~production~~of ~~company~~$325,428 ~~until~~after ~~the~~depreciation, ~~acquisition~~depletion ofand ~~TEG~~amortization ~~was~~expense ~~completed~~of ~~on February 3~~$84,413 ~~2015;~~and ~~(2)~~historical ~~a non~~audit-~~cash~~related ~~equity~~costs ~~compensation~~and ~~expense~~legal costs of $~~703~~81,~~373~~724, ~~which~~with ~~includes~~the ~~$670,090~~loss ~~for~~also ~~stock~~reflecting ~~issued~~low tooil ~~the~~prices ~~HERLLC~~and ~~Sellers;~~lack ~~and~~of well maintenance prior to acquisition; (32) professional fees of $~~181~~184,~~621~~557 ~~largely~~ for ~~pursuing~~ the ~~TEG Acquisition and for the~~ litigation described in Part II, Item 1 (“Legal Proceedings”); and (3) interest expense of $240,303, partially offset by a change in fair value income of $162,992. This loss compares to a $~~176~~400,~~491~~527 loss infor the ~~comparable~~three ~~prior~~months ~~year~~ended ~~quarter~~May 31, 2014.

Revenue was $91279,~~029~~174 for the three months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, compared to $1835,~~348~~755 infor the ~~year~~three ~~ago~~months ~~quarter. TEG~~ended ~~revenue~~May ~~from the February 3~~31, 2015 acquisition date contributed $72,598 net of royalties. Net production was 67 barrels per day. Net oil sales were 59 barrels per day. The average price realized was $43.73 per barrel. Note that the overriding royalty interest granted to a convertible note holder effective January 2015 is accounted for as debt, and does not reduce net revenue (or production or sales statistics).2014:

~~Net~~· ~~oil~~TEG ~~sales~~revenue ~~from~~contributed ~~our~~$259,974 ~~working~~net ~~interest~~of ~~in the DEEP Lease to our account (after~~ royalties); ~~from~~TEG ~~the~~was ~~current~~acquired ~~three~~effective ~~producing wells averaged 4.1 net barrels per day for the three months ended~~ February 281, 2015~~, and realized $33~~.34 ~~per~~Net ~~barrel~~oil ~~before~~sales ~~royalties,~~were ~~compared~~59 ~~to 1.8 net~~ barrels per day ~~to realize $90~~.51 ~~per~~The ~~barrel~~average ~~for~~price ~~the~~realized ~~three~~was ~~months~~$47.62 ~~ended~~per ~~February 28, 2014~~barrel. ~~The~~ ~~impact~~Note ofthat ~~lower prices offset~~ the ~~benefit~~overriding ofroyalty ~~higher~~interest ~~volumes. Part~~granted ~~of the increase in volumes is due~~ to ~~increasing~~a ~~our~~convertible ~~working~~note ~~interest~~holder ineffective ~~the~~January ~~DEEP~~2015 ~~Lease~~is ~~from~~accounted ~~66.67%~~for toas ~~87.18%~~debt, onand ~~February~~does 1,not ~~2014,~~reduce ~~and~~net torevenue ~~100.0%~~(or onproduction ~~May~~or ~~15,~~sales ~~2014~~statistics).

~~Direct~~· ~~operating~~Other ~~costs~~net ~~were~~oil sales principally from the DEEP Lease totaled $9019,~~448~~200 for the three months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, compared to $835,~~020~~755 for the three months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2014. ~~TEG’s~~ ~~costs~~Lower ~~were~~oil ~~$64,238~~prices ~~beginning~~more ~~with~~than ~~its~~offset ~~acquisition~~an onincreased ~~February~~working 3,interest ~~2015. The~~in ~~balance of~~ the ~~increase is due to the~~ DEEP Lease:. weWe increased our working interest in the DEEP Lease from 66.67% to 87.18% on February 1, 2014, and to 100.0% on May 15, 2014~~, which increased our share of DEEP Lease costs; and there were increased repair costs in this year’s period~~.

37Direct operating costs were $283,992 for the three months ended May 31, 2015, up $264,768 compared to $19,224 for the three months ended May 31, 2014. Inclusion of TEG added $272,073 in direct operating costs.

Depletion, depreciation and amortization expense was $4090,~~578~~519 for the three months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, up $78,270 compared to $712,~~847~~249 for the three months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2014. Inclusion of TEG ~~from its February 1, 2015 acquisition date~~ added $2684,~~855~~413 in expense. In addition, our working interest in the DEEP Lease increased from 66.67% to 87.18% on February 1, 2014, and to 100.0% on May 15, 2014, which increases our share of these costs, and DEEP Lease expense further increased as a result of higher volumes in the 2015 period.

Revenue, direct operating costs, and depletion, depreciation and amortization expenses vary with volume, oil prices, downtime, repair and other operating costs, expensed workover programs, investments in drilling for new production and proved reserve estimates.

Professional fees for the three months ended February 28, 2015, were $181,621, increased 49% or $59,649 from $121,972 for the three months ended February 28, 2014, largely due to TEG Acquisition costs of $71,819 in the 2015 period, offset partially by the absence of $25,261 of professional fees related to the acquisition of additional working interests in the DEEP Lease incurred in the year ago period. Also included in the 2015 period is $55,197 principally for litigation costs associated with HERLLC’s claim to coastal lease PRC 145.1 compared to $49,523 in the year ago period, and $42,274 for costs associated with being a public company and tax work, compared to $47,188 a year ago. Also included in the three months ended February 28, 2015 was $12,331 mainly for TEG reserve engineering.37

Professional fees were $287,635 for the three months ended May 31, 2015, down 10% or $32,384 compared to $320,019 for the three months ended May 31, 2014. Included in the 2015 period is $184,557 for litigation costs associated with HERLLC’s claim to coastal lease PRC 145.1 compared to $138,081 in the 2014 period, and $37,725 for costs associated with being a public company and tax work, compared to $75,122 in the 2014 period. The 2015 period includes $68,480 for historical periods’ audit costs of TEG due to SEC requirements and legal fees, whereas the 2014 period included $110,065 for initial early costs in pursuing the acquisition of TEG.

Professional fees can vary substantially from period-to-period going forward depending on acquisition costs, financing activity, business development and property evaluation costs, litigation expenses associated with coastal lease PRC 145.1 and costs associated with being a public company.

InOther general and administrative expenses for the three months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, wewere ~~accrued~~$294,183, ~~bonuses~~up of $~~240~~227,~~000,~~932 compared to ~~zero~~$66,251 infor the ~~prior~~three ~~year~~months ~~quarter. These~~ended ~~amounts~~May ~~were~~31, ~~unpaid~~2014. The atincrease ~~February~~includes 28$147,222 ~~2015~~for ~~and~~TEG ~~shall~~general beand ~~paid~~administrative ~~only~~costs atand ~~such~~$13,244 ~~time~~for inaccounting ~~the~~costs ~~future~~for aspreparing ~~the~~TEG’s ~~finances~~historical offinancial ~~the~~statements ~~Company~~for ~~permit~~audit, as ~~determined~~well byas ~~the~~increased ~~Chief~~costs ~~Financial~~for ~~Officer~~accounting, of$40,964, ~~the~~and ~~Company. No~~investor ~~salaries or consulting fees were paid to the four individuals during the six months ended February 28~~relations, ~~2015~~$25,696.

~~Other~~Equity ~~general~~compensation ~~and~~expense ~~administrative~~was ~~expenses~~$28,468 for the three months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015 ~~were $99~~,~~508,~~ ~~an increase of 85% or $45,843~~ compared to $5314,~~665~~999 for the three months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2014~~. The increase includes $21~~,~~610~~ ~~for~~both ~~TEG’s~~related ~~general~~to ~~and~~stock ~~administrative~~options ~~costs~~granted ~~beginning~~on ~~with~~May ~~February 1~~14, ~~2015, as well as increased costs for accounting, investor relations and rental of office space (rent cost began to be incurred Jan. 1,~~ 2014).

~~Equity~~Interest ~~compensation~~and ~~expense~~other income was $~~703~~11,~~373~~559 for the three months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, compared to $0827 for the three months ended February 28, 2014. Included in the 2015 period is $670,090 for non-cash equity compensation expense for stock released from escrow to the HERLLC Sellers on closing of the TEG Acquisition, and $33,283 related to stock options granted on May 1431, 2014.

Interest ~~income~~expense ofwas $7240,~~776~~303 for the three months ended ~~February 28~~May 31, 2015, compared to $04,367 for the ~~year~~three ~~ago~~months ~~period~~ended May 31, 2014. ~~Interest~~Included ~~income~~in the 2015 amount is ~~primarily~~$85,701 ~~from~~interest on the ~~secured~~bank ~~subordinated~~ loan ~~receivable~~assumed ~~from~~with the TEG ~~until~~Acquisition, ~~the~~$44,037 ~~date~~amortization of ~~closing~~debt discount on ~~February~~long 3term debt, ~~2015. See~~$26,679 ~~Note~~for 5interest expense accrued on convertible notes payable in cash (unless converted to shares), $22,673 for interest payable on the ~~unaudited~~overriding ~~interim~~royalty ~~financial~~interest ~~statements~~liability, ~~included~~and ~~elsewhere~~$61,213 inof ~~this~~other ~~report~~interest expense for additional conversion options on interest accrued, interest and penalties on overdue TEG property taxes, interest on loans payable to related parties and other interest expense.

~~Interest~~Change ~~expense~~in ~~amounted~~fair tovalue of conversion option was $~~136~~162,~~710~~992 of income for the three months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, compared to ~~$3,335~~none for the three months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2014. ~~Included~~ On incertain ~~the 2015 amount is $93,965 for interest expense on~~ convertible notes payable, asa ~~described~~conversion inoption ~~Notes~~is 8required ~~and 9~~ to ~~the~~be ~~unaudited~~bifurcated ~~interim~~from ~~financial statements included elsewhere in this report. There was no comparable amount in~~ the ~~2014~~note ~~period. There~~payable ~~was $27,966 interest on the bank loan assumed with the TEG Acquisition on February 3, 2015,~~ and ~~none~~shown ofas ~~this~~a ~~interest~~separate ~~expense~~liability ~~in the prior year period. Also included in the fiscal 2015 period is $8,740 for interest accrued~~ on ~~loans payable to related parties, short term; there was none in~~ the ~~fiscal~~balance ~~2014 period~~sheet. ~~Also~~It ~~included in interest expense for the three month ended February 28, 2015~~ is ~~$3,982~~marked ~~compared~~ to ~~$2,968~~fair ~~for~~value ~~the~~each ~~year~~quarter ~~ago period for accretion of interest on the DEEP net profits interest payable. Our share of the net profits interest payable increased from 66.67% to 87.18% on February 1~~end, ~~2014,~~with ~~and to 100.0% on May 15, 2014, as a result of acquiring additional working interest. Going forward, interest expense on~~ the ~~NPI~~change ~~will~~in ~~remain~~fair ~~relatively~~value ~~constant~~recorded ~~unless there is a reduction~~ in the ~~expected~~income ~~timeframe for repayment of the NPI, which would cause interest accretion to accelerate~~statement. ~~Finally, there was $2,057 and $367 of other interest for the three months ended February 28, 2015 and 2014 respectively.~~

Income tax benefit was $44,746 for the three months ended May 31, 2015, compared to none for the three months ended May 31, 2014. This deferred tax credit relates to the partial reversal of the tax impact of long-lived assets’ book values being greater than tax basis at the date of acquisition of TEG.

~~Change~~Nine ~~in fair value of conversion option was $7,802 of expense for the three~~ months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, ~~compared to none in the comparable 2014 period. Due to the terms of certain convertible notes payable, the related conversion option was required to be bifurcated from the note payable~~ and ~~is shown as a separate liability on the balance sheet. It is marked to fair value each quarter end, with the change in fair value recorded in the income statement.~~ 2014

~~The~~Net ~~share~~loss of ~~earnings attributable to non-controlling interest is~~ $93,~~531~~785,658 for the ~~three~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, ~~compared~~includes: to(1) ~~none~~equity ~~for~~compensation ~~the~~expense ~~three~~of ~~months~~$1,820,020; ~~ended~~(2) ~~February~~a ~~28,~~TEG ~~2014. The~~operating ~~2015~~loss ~~amount~~of ~~adjusts~~$370,131 ~~the~~after ~~year-to-date~~depreciation, ~~amount~~depletion toand ~~zero~~amortization ~~given~~expense ~~the~~of ~~changed~~$103,352 ~~deal~~and ~~structure~~historical ~~for~~audit-related ~~the~~costs ~~TEG~~and ~~Acquisition. The~~legal ~~final~~costs ~~form~~ of ~~acquisition~~$101,409, ofwith ~~TEG~~the ~~was~~loss ~~Hawker~~also ~~acquiring~~reflecting ~~100%~~low ofoil ~~the~~prices ~~stock~~and lack of ~~TEG,~~well ~~rather~~maintenance ~~than~~prior anto ~~earlier~~acquisition; ~~proposed~~(3) ~~structure~~professional fees of ~~Tapia~~$402,221 ~~Holdings~~for ~~acquiring~~the anlitigation ~~80%~~described ~~membership interest~~ in aPart ~~newly-formed~~II, ~~LLC~~Item ~~which~~1 ~~would~~(“Legal ~~hold~~Proceedings”), ~~the~~(4) TEG ~~Assets. As~~acquisition aexpenses ~~result~~ of ~~the~~$276,012; ~~transaction~~and ~~structure~~(6) ~~changing,~~interest ~~Tapia~~expense ~~Holdings~~of no$469,966, ~~longer~~partially ~~holds~~offset ~~any~~by ~~assets~~a ~~and~~income itof is$189,852 ~~expected~~from ~~that~~a ~~the~~change ~~non-controlling~~in ~~interest~~fair invalue ~~Tapia~~of ~~Holdings~~debt ~~will~~conversion beoptions. This ~~restructured~~loss incompares ~~the~~to ~~near~~a ~~term~~$653,051 ~~the~~loss ~~form~~for ofthe ~~which~~nine ~~has~~months ~~not~~ended ~~yet~~May ~~been~~31, ~~agreed~~2014.

~~Six~~Revenue was $380,497 for the nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, ~~and~~compared to $79,867 for the nine months ended May 31, 2014:

~~Net~~· ~~loss~~TEG ~~attributable~~revenue tofrom the ~~Company~~February ~~of $3~~1,~~059,029~~ ~~for~~2015 ~~the~~effective ~~six~~acquisition ~~months~~date ~~ended~~contributed ~~February 28~~$332,571 ~~2015,~~net ~~was largely the result~~ of: ~~(1)~~royalties. ~~being~~Net aoil ~~development~~sales ~~stage~~were ~~oil~~59 ~~production~~barrels ~~company~~per ~~until~~day. ~~the~~The ~~acquisition~~average ofprice ~~TEG~~realized was ~~completed~~$46.71 onper ~~February~~barrel. 3,Note ~~2015;~~that ~~(2)~~the aoverriding ~~non-cash~~royalty ~~equity~~interest ~~compensation~~granted ~~expense of $1,791,552, which includes $1,700,590 for stock issued~~ to ~~the~~a ~~HERLLC~~convertible ~~Sellers;~~note ~~and~~holder ~~(3)~~effective ~~professional~~January ~~fees~~2015 ofis ~~$612,184~~accounted ~~largely~~ for ~~pursuing~~as ~~the~~debt, ~~TEG Acquisition~~ and ~~for~~does ~~the~~not ~~litigation~~reduce ~~described~~net inrevenue ~~Part~~(or ~~II,~~production ~~Item~~or 1sales ~~(“Legal Proceedings”~~statistics). ~~This loss compares to a $252,524 loss in the comparable prior year period.~~

~~Revenue~~· ~~was~~Other net oil sales principally from the DEEP Lease totaled $~~101~~47,~~323~~926 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, compared to $4479,~~112~~867 infor the ~~year~~nine ~~ago~~months ~~period~~ended May 31, 2014. ~~TEG~~ ~~revenue~~Lower ~~from~~oil ~~the~~prices ~~February~~more 3,than ~~2015~~offset ~~acquisition~~an ~~date~~increased ~~contributed~~working ~~$72,598~~interest ~~net~~in ofthe ~~royalties~~DEEP Lease. ~~Net~~ ~~production~~We ~~was~~increased 67our ~~barrels~~working ~~per~~interest ~~day.~~in ~~Net~~the ~~oil~~DEEP ~~sales~~Lease ~~were~~from 5966.67% ~~barrels~~to ~~per day~~87. ~~The~~18% ~~average~~on ~~price~~February ~~realized~~1, ~~was~~2014, ~~$43.73~~and ~~per~~to ~~barrel~~100. ~~Note~~0% ~~that~~on ~~the~~May ~~overriding~~15, ~~royalty~~2014. ~~interest~~Net ~~granted~~revenues tofor athe ~~convertible~~nine ~~note~~months ~~holder effective~~ended ~~January~~May 31, 2015 isalso ~~accounted~~includes ~~for~~a asreduction ~~debt~~of $11,473 ~~and~~related ~~does~~to ~~not~~the ~~reduce~~operator’s ~~net~~royalty ~~revenue~~computations ~~(or~~for ~~production~~prior orfiscal ~~sales statistics)~~year.

~~The~~Direct ~~increase~~operating incosts ~~revenue~~were ~~from~~$390,436 ~~TEG~~for ~~was~~the ~~partially~~nine ~~offset~~months byended aMay ~~decrease~~31, at2015, compared to $40,216 for the ~~DEEP~~nine ~~Lease~~months ofended ~~$18~~May 31,~~805~~ 2014. AnTEG’s ~~increase~~costs inwere ~~oil~~$336,311 ~~sales~~beginning ~~both~~with ~~from~~its aacquisition ~~higher~~on ~~working~~February ~~interest~~3, ~~and~~2015. The ~~from~~balance ~~higher~~of ~~production~~the ~~was~~increase ~~more~~is ~~than~~due ~~offset~~to bythe ~~lower~~DEEP ~~oil~~Lease: ~~prices~~we ~~and~~increased ~~higher~~our ~~royalties. Our~~ working interest in the DEEP Lease ~~increased~~ from 66.67% to 87.18% on February 1, 2014, and to 100.0% on May 15, 2014~~. Net~~, ~~oil~~which ~~sales~~increased ~~from~~ our ~~working~~share ~~interest~~of ~~in the~~ DEEP Lease ~~to our account (after royalties) from the current three producing wells averaged 3~~costs.3 net barrels per day for the six months ended February 28, 2015, and realized $48.00 per barrel before royalties, compared to 2.2 net barrels per day to realize $90.88 per barrel for the six months ended February 28, 2014. Net revenues for the six months ended February 28, 2015 also includes a reduction of $11,473 related to the operator’s royalty computations for prior fiscal year.

~~Direct~~Depletion, ~~operating~~depreciation ~~costs~~and ~~were~~amortization expense was $~~106~~142,~~444~~133 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, compared to $2028,~~992~~206 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2014. ~~TEG’s~~Inclusion ~~costs~~of ~~were~~TEG ~~$64,238~~from ~~beginning with~~ its ~~acquisition on~~ February 31, 2015~~. The~~ ~~balance~~acquisition ofdate ~~the~~added ~~increase~~$103,352 isin ~~due~~expense. In toaddition, ~~the DEEP Lease: we increased~~ our working interest in the DEEP Lease increased from 66.67% to 87.18% on February 1, 2014, and to 100.0% on May 15, 2014, which ~~increased~~increases our share of ~~DEEP~~these ~~Lease~~ costs~~; and there were increased repair costs in this year’s period~~.

Depletion, depreciation and amortization expense was $51,614 for the six months ended February 28, 2015, compared to $15,957 for the six months ended February 28, 2014. Inclusion of TEG from its February 1, 2015 acquisition date added $26,855 in expense. In addition, our working interest in the DEEP Lease increased from 66.67% to 87.18% on February 1, 2014, and to 100.0% on May 15, 2014, which increases our share of these costs, and DEEP Lease expense further increased as a result of higher oil sales in the 2015 period.

39Professional fees for the nine months ended May 31, 2015, were $899,819, increased $386,757 or 75% from $513,062 for the nine months ended May 31, 2014. Included in the 2015 period is: $276,012 legal, audit and diligence costs related to TEG Acquisition, compared to $110,065 in the 2014 period for the initial work on the potential acquisition; $402,221 for litigation costs associated with HERLLC’s claim to coastal lease PRC 145.1 compared to $187,604 in the prior year period subsequent to the acquisition of HERLLC on January 1, 2014; $80,812 in the 2015 period for TEG since the February 1, 2015 effective date of the acquisition, including $46,750 of historical periods’ audit costs; and in the 2014 period $86,718 for the costs incurred for the reverse merger with SCNRG completed October 25, 2013; and $140,774 for all other costs including costs of being a public company and annual audit and tax work, compared to $128,675 in the 2014 period.

Professional fees for the six months ended February 28, 2015, were $612,184, increased $419,141 from $193,043 for the six months ended February 28, 2014. Included in the 2015 period is: $280,884 legal, audit and diligence costs related to TEG Acquisition, compared to none in the prior year period; $217,663 for litigation costs associated with HERLLC’s claim to coastal lease PRC 145.1 compared to $49,523 in the prior year period subsequent to the acquisition of HERLLC on January 1, 2014; $101,305 for costs associated with being a public company including the annual audit and tax work, compared to $53,553 in the prior year period; $12,332 in the 2015 period for the TEG since the February 3, 2015 date of acquisition; and in the 2014 period only $89,967 for the costs of the reverse merger with SCNRG completed October 25, 2013.

Professional fees can vary substantially from period-to-period going forward depending on acquisition activity, financing activity, business development and property evaluation costs, litigation expenses associated with coastal lease PRC 145.1 and costs associated with being a public company.

In the six months ended February 28, 2015, we accrued bonuses of $240,000, compared to zero in the prior year quarter. These amounts were unpaid at February 28, 2015 and shall be paid only at such time in the future as the finances of the Company permit, as determined by the Chief Financial Officer of the Company. No salaries or consulting fees were paid to the four individuals during the six months ended February 28, 2015.39

~~Other~~During ~~general and administrative expenses for~~ the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, ~~were~~we accrued bonuses of $~~174~~240,~~035~~000, compared to ~~$59,896~~none ~~for~~during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2014. These ~~reflecting~~amounts ~~increased~~were ~~investor~~unpaid ~~relations~~at ~~activities~~May 31, ~~additional~~2015 ~~outsourced~~and ~~accounting~~will ~~services~~be ~~due~~paid toonly aat ~~higher~~such ~~activity~~time ~~level,~~in ~~and~~the ~~increased~~future ~~rent~~as ~~expense~~our ~~(rent~~finances ~~began~~permit, ~~January~~as 1,determined ~~2014)~~by our Chief Financial Officer . In No ~~addition,~~salaries ~~TEG~~or ~~general~~consulting ~~and~~fees ~~administrative~~were ~~costs~~paid to three of ~~$21~~the four individuals awarded bonuses during the nine months ended May 31,~~762~~ ~~were~~2015; ~~incurred~~one ~~beginning~~began ~~with~~charging ~~TEG’s~~consulting ~~acquisition~~fees onMarch ~~February~~1, 32015 although these fees remain largely unpaid at May 31, 2015.

~~Equity~~Other ~~compensation~~general ~~expense~~and ~~was~~administrative ~~$1,791,552~~expenses for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015 were $468,218 compared to $0126,147 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2014. ~~Included~~TEG ingeneral ~~the~~and ~~2015~~administrative ~~period~~costs isof $1182,~~700,590~~228 ~~for~~were ~~non-cash~~incurred ~~equity~~in ~~compensation~~2015 ~~for~~beginning ~~stock~~with ~~released~~TEG’s ~~from~~acquisition, ~~escrow~~including to$20,598 ~~the~~of ~~HERLLC~~historical ~~Sellers~~periods’ onaudit ~~closing~~preparation ofcosts. ~~the~~In ~~TEG Acquisition~~addition, ~~and~~increased investor relations activities in 2015 added $9056,~~962~~478, ~~related~~and additional outsourced accounting services due to ~~stock~~a ~~options~~higher ~~granted~~activity onlevel ~~May~~added 14$65, ~~2014~~579.

~~Interest~~Equity ~~income~~compensation ofexpense was $181,~~280~~820,020 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February 28~~May 31, 2015, compared to $014,999 for the ~~year~~nine ~~ago~~months ~~period~~ended May 31, 2014. ~~Interest~~Included ~~income~~in the 2015 period is ~~primarily~~$1,700,590 ~~from~~for ~~the~~non-cash ~~secured~~equity ~~subordinated~~compensation ~~loan~~for ~~receivable~~stock released from ~~TEG~~escrow ~~through~~to the ~~date~~HERLLC ofSellers on closing of the TEG Acquisition, onand ~~February 3~~$119,430 ~~2015. See~~related ~~Note 5~~ to ~~the~~stock ~~unaudited~~options ~~interim~~granted ~~financial~~on ~~statements~~May ~~included~~14, ~~elsewhere in this report~~2014.

Interest ~~expense~~and ~~amounted~~other toincome was $~~229~~29,~~663~~839 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, compared to $~~6,748~~827 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2014. ~~Included~~ Interest inincome ~~the~~of ~~2015 amount is~~ $~~176~~18,~~034~~280 ~~for~~was ~~interest~~accrued ~~expense~~ on ~~convertible notes payable, as described in Notes 8 and 9 to~~ the ~~unaudited~~secured ~~interim~~subordinated ~~financial~~loan ~~statements~~receivable ~~included~~from ~~elsewhere~~TEG inthrough ~~this report. There was no comparable amount in~~ the ~~2014~~date ~~period. There~~of ~~was~~closing ~~$27,966~~of ~~interest on~~ the ~~bank loan assumed with the~~ TEG Acquisition on February 3, 2015~~, and none of this interest expense in the prior year period~~. ~~Also~~See ~~included~~Note in5 ~~the fiscal 2015 period is $15,520 for interest accrued on loans payable~~ to ~~related parties, short term; there was none in~~ the ~~fiscal~~unaudited ~~2014~~interim ~~period. In~~financial ~~addition,~~statements included inelsewhere interest expense for the six month ended February 28, 2015 is $8,086 compared to $6,009 for the year ago period for accretion of interest on the DEEP net profits interest payable. Our share of the net profits interest payable increased from 66.67% to 87.18% on February 1, 2014, and to 100.0% on May 15, 2014 as a result of acquiring additional working interest. Going forward, interest expense on the NPI will remain relatively constant unless there is a reduction in ~~the~~this ~~expected timeframe for repayment of the NPI, which would cause interest accretion to accelerate~~report. ~~Finally, there was $2,057 and $739 of other interest expense for the six months ended February 28, 2015 and 2014 respectively.~~

~~Change~~Interest inexpense ~~fair value of conversion option~~ was $26469,~~860~~966 ~~of income~~ for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, compared to ~~none~~$11,115 infor the ~~comparable~~nine ~~2014~~months ~~period~~ended May 31, 2014. ~~Due~~Included toin the ~~terms~~2015 amount is $113,667 interest on the bank loan assumed with the TEG Acquisition beginning February 1, 2015, $150,388 amortization of ~~certain~~debt discount on debt, $84,575 for interest expense accrued on convertible notes payable, ~~the~~in ~~related~~cash ~~conversion~~(unless ~~option~~converted ~~was~~to ~~required~~shares), to$33,946 befor ~~bifurcated~~interest ~~from~~payable on the ~~note~~overriding ~~payable~~royalty interest liability, and is$87,390 ~~shown~~of asother ainterest ~~separate~~expense ~~liability~~for onadditional ~~the~~conversion ~~balance~~options ~~sheet. It~~on isinterest ~~marked~~accrued, tointerest ~~fair~~and ~~value~~penalties ~~each~~on ~~quarter~~overdue ~~end~~TEG property taxes, ~~with~~interest ~~the~~on ~~change~~loans inpayable ~~fair~~to ~~value~~related ~~recorded~~parties inand ~~the~~other ~~income~~interest ~~statement~~expense.

Change in fair value of conversion options was $189,852 of income for the nine months ended May 31, 2015, compared to none in the comparable 2014 period. On certain convertible notes payable, a conversion option is required to be bifurcated from the note payable and shown as a separate liability on the balance sheet. It is marked to fair value each quarter end, with the change in fair value recorded in the income statement.

Drop in Oil Prices

Our revenues, operating results, profitability, future rate of growth and the carrying value of our oil properties depend primarily upon the prevailing prices for oil. Historically, oil prices have been volatile and are subject to fluctuations in response to changes in supply and demand, market uncertainty and a variety of additional factors. During the last year, there has been a sudden and precipitous drop in ~~prices~~the price of oil ~~and gas~~, resulting in a great deal of uncertainty about the market in the future. See also “Drop in Oil Prices” under “Recent Business Developments” above.

Cash Flows

Operating Activities

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, we used cash in the amount of $~~388~~688,~~710~~747 for operating activities, compared to $~~203~~260,~~840~~245 cash used in operating activities infor the ~~corresponding~~nine ~~year~~month ~~ago~~ period ended May 31, 2014. Although the loss increased from $~~252~~653,~~524~~051 to $3,~~059~~785,~~029~~658, $1,~~791~~820,~~552~~020 of equity compensation expense in the current period did not involve a cash outlay. There were significant professional fees, $~~612~~899,~~184~~819, and we incurred other general administrative costs of $~~174~~468,~~035~~218, for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, both as discussed above; these amounts compare to $~~193~~513,~~043~~062 and $59126,~~896~~147 respectively for the ~~six~~nine ~~months~~month period ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2014. However, these increases in cash expenses were mostly offset by an increase of $~~440~~695,~~691~~861 in accounts payable (largely for professional fees) for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, compared to an increase in accounts payable of $16329,~~134~~205 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2014. We anticipate that the accounts payable will be paid from proceeds from private placements or other financings that we may undertake.

Investing Activities

Cash flows used in investing activities were $~~332~~365,~~534~~652 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, compared to cash flows used in investing activities of $~~192~~620,~~782~~088 for the ~~year~~nine ~~ago~~months ~~period~~ended May 31, 2014.

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, we advanced a further $346,625 to TEG pursuant to a secured subordinated loan and wefixed ~~launched~~asset ~~our~~purchases ~~website~~were ~~costing~~ $942,~~253~~371. These amounts were partially offset by cash acquired in the TEG Acquisition of $23,344. In the ~~comparable~~nine ~~2014~~month period ended May 31, 2014, the reverse merger of SCNRG with Hawker meant we acquired Hawker’s cash balance of $6,004, and we acquired HERLLC and its cash balance of $1,214,. Additionally ~~and~~during inthe ~~addition~~nine months ended May 31, 2014, we acquired an additional 2033.533% working interest in the DEEP lease for $~~200~~325,000 and loaned TEG $302,306.

Financing Activities

Cash flows provided by financing activities were $~~760~~1,~~852~~060,583 for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, compared to cash flows provided by financing activities of $~~462~~1,~~611~~130,199 for the ~~year~~nine ~~ago~~months ~~period~~ended May 31, 2014.

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, we generated net cash proceeds of $~~233~~390,~~800~~300 from related party loans, $300,000 from convertible notes payable, $258,118 from other debt, $114,920 from the sale of Units (defined below), and $90,000 from the sale of a non-controlling interest in Tapia Holdings ~~and $50,000 pursuant to a long term note payable~~. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, we used cash of $1050,000 for partial repayment of a loan from a related party, and paid down other debt $1742,~~868~~755. In onaddition, Sefton ~~the~~paid ~~DEEP~~TEG’s ~~net~~lender ~~profits~~$400,000 ~~interest~~and ~~liability~~we issued a $400,000 note to Sefton. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2014, we issued Units for $~~434~~669,~~524~~901, received $40300,000 ~~for~~pursuant ~~Units~~to ~~not~~convertible ~~closed~~notes, byreceived ~~February~~loans ~~28,~~from ~~2014,~~related ~~and~~parties ~~paid~~of $11180,~~913~~000, ~~required~~and ~~under~~paid ~~this~~down ~~same~~other ~~DEEP~~debt ~~liability~~by ~~when our working interest was less than in the current period~~$19,702.

The price of each “Unit” was $0.10. Each Unit was comprised of one share of our common stock, together with a warrant to acquire an additional one-half share of our common stock on payment of $0.20 per share. The warrants expire five years from each closing date.

Liquidity and Financial Condition

As of ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, we had cash of $5219,~~815~~391, current assets of $9987,~~567~~463, current liabilities of $78,~~452~~120,~~321~~721 and a working capital deficit of $78,~~352~~033,~~754~~258. During the ~~six~~three ~~months~~month period and nine month period ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, ~~the~~we ~~Company~~ had a net ~~loss~~losses ~~attributable~~of to$726,629 ~~the~~and ~~Company of~~ $3,~~059~~785,~~029~~658, respectively. For the nine months ended May 31, 2015, the loss is largely attributable to:

non-cash equity compensation expense of $1,700,590 for common stock issued to the HERLLC Sellers as described above;

· other non-cash equity compensation of $90119,~~962~~430 representing the periodic expense for stock options granted in the prior fiscal year;

· $~~612~~899,~~184~~819 in professional fees including $~~280~~276,~~884~~012 for the ~~proposed~~ TEG ~~acquisition~~Acquisition and $~~217~~402,~~663~~221 for HERLLC litigation; and

· $~~174~~468,~~035~~218 of other general administrative costs.

41Despite the large loss, cash flow used in operating activities was $688,747, reflecting the non-cash nature of the equity compensation expense ($1,820,020 in total), and a growth in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $614,928 and other liabilities by $440,950.

Despite the large loss, cash flow used in operating activities was $388,710, reflecting the non-cash nature of the equity compensation expense ($1,791,552 in total) and a growth in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $440,691.

To date, we have relied on investor capital to fund our operating and investing activities, as described in the cash flow discussion above, and also have seen a significant increase in our outstanding accounts payable balance.

Management’s business plan for the balance of the calendar year 2015 given the low oil price is to ~~begin~~do ~~the~~high ~~further~~rate ~~development~~ of ~~the~~return ~~Tapia~~maintenance ~~Assets~~projects ~~(oil~~and ~~prices~~continue ~~permitting)~~with cost cutting initiatives at the Tapia Canyon field, continue to pursue HERLLC’s claim to coastal lease PRC 145.1 (see Part II, Item 1, “Legal Proceedings”), ~~conduct further technical work on the DEEP property if funds permit,~~ and pursue other potential acquisition opportunities. We currently do not have sufficient financial resources to fund this plan and will need to continue to raise external capital. In addition, we intend to refinance or extend TEG’s bank loan by its December 31, 2015 maturity date. We will also require further financial resources to ~~further~~ develop the Tapia and Eureka Assets and the DEEP Lease, to exploit coastal lease PRC 145.1 (assuming we are successful in securing our claim in the lease) and close other acquisition opportunities in future years.

We presently do not have any available credit, financing or other external sources of liquidity. In order to obtain future capital, we anticipate needing to ~~sell~~raise additional ~~shares~~equity ofcapital ~~common stock~~ or borrow funds from private lenders. We have no assurance that future financings will be available to us on acceptable terms. If financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to continue, develop, or expand our operations. Equity financing could result in additional dilution to existing shareholders and any downturn in oil prices or in the U.S. stock and debt markets is likely to make it more difficult to obtain financing through the issuance of equity or debt securities. The current low oil price ~~also~~ makes fund raising more difficult, although it may result in new acquisition opportunities. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining additional funding.

Even if we are able to raise the funds required, it is possible that operations do not perform as expected, we could incur unexpected costs and expenses, fail to consummate ~~contemplated~~potential transactions, or experience unexpected cash requirements that would force us to seek alternative financing.

Business Plan and Funding Needs

There is limited historical financial information about us upon which to base an evaluation of our performance. We ~~are in the development stage of our business and have generated minimal revenues from operations. We~~ cannot guarantee we will be successful in our business operations. Our business is subject to risks inherent in the establishment of a new business enterprise, including limited capital resources, possible delays in the implementation of our plan of operations or difficulties with closing and achieving expected acquisition results, production and commodity price declines, extended periods of low oil prices and possible cost overruns due to price and cost increases in services.

We have no assurance that future financings will be available to us on acceptable terms. If financing is not available on satisfactory terms, we may be unable to continue, develop, or expand our operations or complete acquisitions. Equity financing could result in additional dilution to existing stockholders.

For these reasons, our auditors stated in their report for our last fiscal year that they have substantial doubt we will be able to continue as a going concern.

Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. As of ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, we had cash of $5219,~~815~~391, current assets of $9987,~~567~~463, current liabilities of $78,~~452~~120,~~321~~721 and a working capital deficit of $78,~~352~~033,~~754~~258. During the ~~six~~three ~~months~~month period and nine month period ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, ~~the~~we ~~Company~~ had a net ~~loss~~losses ~~attributable~~of to$726,629 ~~the~~and ~~Company of~~ $3,~~059~~785,~~029~~658, ~~and~~respectively. As atof ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, we had an accumulated net loss of $5,~~139~~866,~~387~~016 since the inception of SCNRG in December 2009.

The financial statements contained elsewhere in this report do not include adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of reported asset amounts or the amount and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern. Our continuation as a going concern is dependent upon our ability to obtain additional financing or sale of our common stock as may be required and ultimately to attain profitability.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

There were no changes to our critical accounting policies in this most recent reporting period from those disclosed in our Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended ~~November~~February 3028, ~~2014, except for the addition of the following:~~2015.

Overriding Royalty Interest Liability

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which is intended to define management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an organization’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. Under GAAP, financial statements are prepared based on the presumption that the reporting organization will continue to operate as a going concern, except in limited circumstances. Financial reporting under this presumption is commonly referred to as the going concern basis of accounting. The going concern basis of accounting is critical to financial reporting because it establishes the fundamental basis for measuring and classifying assets and liabilities. Currently, GAAP lacks guidance about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about the organization’s ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related footnote disclosures. This ASU provides guidance to an organization’s management, with principles and definitions that are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and content of disclosures that are commonly provided by organizations today in the financial statement footnotes. The new guidance is effective for the interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016; early adoption is permitted for annual or interim reporting periods for which the financial statements have not previously been issued. The Company has not conducted its analysis to determine whether it will adopt the new standard early or not.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern, which is intended to define management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an organization’s ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. Under GAAP, financial statements are prepared based on the presumption that the reporting organization will continue to operate as a going concern, except in limited circumstances. Financial reporting under this presumption is commonly referred to as the going concern basis of accounting. The going concern basis of accounting is critical to financial reporting because it establishes the fundamental basis for measuring and classifying assets and liabilities. Currently, GAAP lacks guidance about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about the organization’s ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related footnote disclosures. This ASU provides guidance to an organization’s management, with principles and definitions that are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and content of disclosures that are commonly provided by organizations today in the financial statement footnotes. The new guidance is effective for the interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016; early adoption is permitted for annual or interim reporting periods for which the financial statements have not previously been issued. We have not conducted our analysis to determine whether we will adopt the new standard early or not.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

Item 3

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

Item 4

Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures that isare designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the issuer's management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As required by Rule 13a-15 under the Exchange Act, as of the end of the period covered by this report, we have carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures. Under the direction of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, we evaluated our disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting and concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of ~~February~~May 2831, 2015.

In connection with the preparation and filing of our Form 10-K/A for the year ended August 31, ~~2015~~2014, and our Form 10-Q/A for the three months ended November 30, 2014, ~~the~~our ~~Company’s~~ management, including our Chief Executive Officer (who is also our Chief Financial Officer), re-evaluated the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2014. This re-evaluation confirmed that the material weaknesses described in the ~~Original~~original Form 10-K ~~continue~~for the year ended August 31, 2014, continued to be material weaknesses as of the time of the re-evaluation, and that some of these same material weaknesses contributed to a restatement of the financial statements included in those amended filings. In addition, the re-evaluation concluded that an additional material weakness existed relating to the calculation of derivative liability related to embedded conversion feature in two of our convertible notes payable, and to the fair value of financial instruments footnote disclosure, which also contributed to the restatement. As a result, our management continued to conclude that, because of the material weaknesses described below, ~~the~~our ~~Company’s~~ internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of August 31, 2014.

A “material weakness” is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In connection with our management’s evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting described above, our management has identified the following deficiencies that it believes constituted individually, and in the aggregate, material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2014:

Lack of an audit committee, comprised of independent directors, of our Board of Directors, and lack of independent directors on our Board.

Inadequate number of accounting and finance personnel or consultants sufficiently trained to address some of the complex accounting and financial reporting matters that arise from time-to-time, and an insufficient number of management and accounting personnel for effective segregation of duties.

Lack of control procedures and documentation thereof.

Error in calculation of derivative liability related to embedded conversion feature in certain convertible notes payable.

Error in determination of fair value of financial instruments.

Until we increase the size and scale of our operations, the foregoing material weaknesses are expected to continue. We will however in the future engage outside accounting professionals, as may be necessary and advisable, to assist us in evaluating more complex accounting matters including derivatives and fair value accounting and disclosure, and we will increase our use of manual mitigating control procedures and employ any additional tools and resources deemed necessary to provide assurance that our financial statements be fairly stated in all material respects.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

During the ~~quarter~~three months ended ~~February~~May 2831, 2015, there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act) that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II

Item 1

Legal Proceedings

Punta Gorda Resources, LLC vs. Windsor Energy US Corporation, Rincon Island Limited Partnership, Ron Klarc, James P. Garten, and Skiff Lake Holdings, South Coast Oil Corporation, Case No. 56-2013-00440672-CU-BC-VTA, Superior Court of California, Ventura County. On June 4, 2013, Punta Gorda Resources, LLC (a wholly owned subsidiary of HERLLC) filed a complaint for specific performance, breach of contract and declaratory relief in the United States Bankruptcy Court against the named defendants seeking to compel them to transfer lease rights and interests and overriding royalty interests provided in a Bankruptcy Court-approved Settlement Agreement concerning coastal lease PRC 145.1 just offshore Ventura County in the Rincon Field. The complaint was dismissed on procedural grounds and re-filed by Punta Gorda in the Ventura County Superior Court. Defendant Rincon now holds all of the subject rights and interests, except the Garten overriding royalty interest. Punta Gorda has been appointed as Special Administrator of the Garten Estate for the purpose of bringing the Garten interest into the litigation and making it subject to a judgment. Deposition, document and written discovery have commenced. On June 19, 2014, defendant Rincon filed a motion for summary judgment, which we ~~intend~~have ~~to oppose~~opposed. The hearing for the summary judgment motion is scheduled for July 27, 2015. ~~Trial~~A mandatory settlement conference is scheduled for ~~March~~September 239, ~~2016,~~2015. Trial ~~although~~is wescheduled ~~expect~~for ~~the~~March ~~trial date to be continued to a later~~23, ~~yet to be determined date~~2016. Although we intend to vigorously pursue Punta Gorda’s rights in this case, the outcome of this matter is not determinable as of the date of this report.

Bank of the West v. Sefton Resources, Inc., TEG Oil & Gas U.S.A., Inc., and TEG Midcontinent, Inc., Ventura County Superior Court Case No. 56-2014-00451934-CU-BC-VTA. On April 23, 2014, BOTW filed a complaint for breach of loan agreement and sought appointment of a receiver and injunctive relief. The loan is secured by tangible and intangible real and personal property interests in oil and gas leases in Los Angeles and Ventura Counties. Shortly after the filing, the parties entered into a forbearance agreement, which as amended, extends the forbearance to December 31, 2015. Pending the forbearance period, the litigation is informally stayed. Sefton Resources, Inc. and TEG Midcontinent, Inc. have been dismissed from the lawsuit and are no longer responsible for the loan. TEG remains responsible for the loan. Although we plan to refinance the loan or renegotiate with BOTW prior to the expiration of the forbearance period on December 31, 2015, as of the date of this report, no assurances can be made that we will be able to refinance the loan on terms satisfactory to us or that an agreement will be reached with BOTW to extend or restructure our obligations.

In addition to the pending matters described above, we are, from time to time, involved in various legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of our business. We are unable to predict the ultimate outcome of these matters.

Item 1A

Risk Factors

Not required for a smaller reporting company.

Item 2

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

~~During the three months ended February 28, 2015, we issued an aggregate of 1,150,000 “Units” to two investors for gross proceeds of $115,000, received in January 2015~~None. The price of each Unit was $0.10. Each Unit was comprised of one share of our common stock, together with a warrant to acquire an additional half-share of our common stock on payment of $0.20 per share. The warrants expire five years from the closing date.

In addition, during the three months ended February 28, 2015, we amended and combined several convertible notes payable into a new convertible note payable to extend the maturity date and provide for additional funding to Hawker in the amount of $250,000 as described in note 9 to the unaudited interim financial statements included in this report.

The issuances of the securities described above were made in reliance upon the exemption from registration available under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (“Securities Act”), including Regulation D promulgated thereunder, as transactions not involving a public offering. The exemption was claimed on the basis that the transactions did not involve any public offering and the purchasers were accredited investors. In each case, appropriate investment representations were obtained and stock certificates were issued with restrictive legends.

Item 3

Defaults upon Senior Securities

None.

Item 4

Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5

Other Information

None.

Item 6

Exhibits

Number	Exhibit
3.1	Articles of Incorporation (1), as amended by the Certificate of Amendment (2)
3.2	Bylaws (3)
10.1	Form of Warrant (U.S. Investor) for Unit Sale (4)
10.2	Form of Warrant (Non-U.S. Investor) for Unit Sale (5)
10.3	~~Amended~~Sixth ~~and~~Amendment ~~Restated~~to ~~Subordination~~Forbearance ~~and~~Agreement, ~~Intercreditor~~dated ~~Agreement~~March 18, 2015, by and among ~~Tapia~~Sefton ~~Holdings~~Resources, ~~LLC, Hawker Energy,~~ Inc., TEG Oil & Gas U.S.A., Inc., ~~Sefton~~TEG ~~Resources~~MidContinent, Inc., ~~TEG~~Hawker ~~MidContinent~~Energy, Inc., and Bank of the West. ~~dated January 1, 2015~~ (6)
10.5	Share Purchase Agreement, dated January 12, 2015, by and among Hawker Energy, Inc., Sefton Resources, Inc. and TEG Oil & Gas U.S.A., Inc. (7)
10.4	Promissory Note, dated March 18, 2015, in the aggregate principal amount of $400,000, issued by Hawker Energy, Inc. in favor of Sefton Resources, Inc. (7)
10.6	Warrant, dated February 1, 2015, issued by Hawker Energy, Inc. to Sefton Resources, Inc. (8)
10.5	Third Amended and Restated Secured Convertible Promissory Note in the principal amount of $1 million issued by Hawker Energy, Inc. in favor of Oceanside Strategies, Inc. dated May 27, 2015. (8)
10.7	Limited Recourse Guarantee by Sefton Resources, Inc. in favor of Hawker Energy, Inc. dated January 12, 2015 (9)
31	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer
10.8	Pledge Agreement, dated January 12, 2015, made by Sefton Resources, Inc. in favor of Hawker Energy, Inc. (10)
32	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer
10.9	Fourth Amended and Restated Security Agreement, dated January 12, 2015, made by TEG Oil & Gas U.S.A., Inc. in favor of Hawker Energy, Inc. (11)
101.INS*	XBRL Instance Document
10.10	Sixth Amendment to Forbearance Agreement, dated March 18, 2015, by and among Sefton Resources, Inc., TEG Oil & Gas U.S.A., Inc., TEG MidContinent, Inc., Hawker Energy, Inc. and Bank of the West. (12)
101.SCH*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
10.11	Promissory Note, dated March 18, 2015, in the aggregate principal amount of $400,000, issued by Hawker Energy, Inc. in favor of Sefton Resources, Inc. (13)
101.CAL*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
10.12	Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of October 21, 2008, by and among Sefton Resources, Inc., TEG Oil & Gas U.S.A., Inc., TEG MidContinent, Inc. and Bank of the West.
101.LAB*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
10.13	First Amendment of Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, Borrowing Base Redetermination and Limited Waiver, dated as of July 23, 2009, by and among Sefton Resources, Inc., TEG Oil & Gas U.S.A., Inc., TEG MidContinent, Inc. and Bank of the West.
101.PRE*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
10.14	Second Amendment of Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, Borrowing Base Redetermination and Forbearance Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2009, by and among Sefton Resources, Inc., TEG Oil & Gas U.S.A., Inc., TEG MidContinent, Inc. and Bank of the West.
101.DEF*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
10.15	Third Amendment of Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, Borrowing Base Redetermination and Limited Waiver, dated as of July 20, 2010, by and among Sefton Resources, Inc., TEG Oil & Gas U.S.A., Inc., TEG MidContinent, Inc. and Bank of the West.
10.16	Fourth Amendment of Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Borrowing Base Redetermination, dated as of February 1, 2011, by and among Sefton Resources, Inc., TEG Oil & Gas U.S.A., Inc., TEG MidContinent, Inc. and Bank of the West.
10.17	Fifth Amendment of Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Borrowing Base Redetermination, dated as of September 1, 2011, by and among Sefton Resources, Inc., TEG Oil & Gas U.S.A., Inc., TEG MidContinent, Inc. and Bank of the West.
10.18	Sixth Amendment of Amended and Restated Credit Agreement and Borrowing Base Redetermination, dated as of January 23, 2012, by and among Sefton Resources, Inc., TEG Oil & Gas U.S.A., Inc., TEG MidContinent, Inc. and Bank of the West.
10.19	Seventh Amendment of Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2012, by and among Sefton Resources, Inc., TEG Oil & Gas U.S.A., Inc., TEG MidContinent, Inc. and Bank of the West.
10.20	Eighth Amendment of Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of February 19, 2013, by and among Sefton Resources, Inc., TEG Oil & Gas U.S.A., Inc., TEG MidContinent, Inc. and Bank of the West.

(1)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on October 22, 2007.
(2)	Incorporated by reference to Appendix A of the Company’s Definitive Information Statement on Schedule 14C filed on August 20, 2014.
(3)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on October 22, 2007.
(4)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 16, 2014.
(5)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 16, 2014.
(6)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2015.
(7)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2015.
(8)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on June 19, 2015.

* Pursuant to applicable securities laws and regulations, we are deemed to have complied with the reporting obligation relating to the submission of interactive data files in such exhibits and are not subject to liability under any anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws as long as we have made a good faith attempt to comply with the submission requirements and promptly amend the interactive data files after becoming aware that the interactive data files fail to comply with the submission requirements. Users of this data are advised that, pursuant to Rule 406T, these interactive data files are deemed not filed and otherwise are not subject to liability.

10.21	Ninth Amendment of Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of May 13, 2013, by and among Sefton Resources, Inc., TEG Oil & Gas U.S.A., Inc., TEG MidContinent, Inc. and Bank of the West.
10.22	Third Amended and Restated Secured Convertible Promissory Note in the principal amount of $1 million issued by Hawker Energy, Inc. in favor or Oceanside Strategies, Inc. dated May 27, 2015.
31	Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer
32	Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer
101.INS*	XBRL Instance Document
101.SCH*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CAL*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LAB*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PRE*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEF*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

(1)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on October 22, 2007.
(2)	Incorporated by reference to Appendix A of the Company’s Definitive Information Statement on Schedule 14C filed on August 20, 2014.
(3)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed on October 22, 2007.
(4)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 16, 2014.
(5)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 16, 2014.
(6)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on January 20, 2015.
(7)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on January 20, 2015.
(8)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on February 9, 2015.
(9)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on January 20, 2015.
(10)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on January 20, 2015.
(11)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed on January 20, 2015.
(12)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2015.
(13)	Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 24, 2015.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

		Hawker Energy, Inc.
Date: June 18, 2015		/s/ Darren Katic
Date: July 14, 2015		/s/ Darren Katic
		Darren Katic Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)

4948

Filing Compare · HAWKER ENERGY, INC.