UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2013
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014
Or
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________ to _______

Commission File Number: 0-24143

RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST V

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware		22-3437351
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

500 Delaware Avenue, #1112 Wilmington, DE		19801
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

	(302) 888-7444
	(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

	Not Applicable
	(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company þ
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

As of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2013~~2014, there were 932.8877 Investor Shares outstanding.

Table of Contents

FORM 10-Q

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	Page

Item 1.	Financial Statements	1

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	5

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	6

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	6

PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	7

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	7

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	7

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	7

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	7

Item 5.	Other Information	7

Item 6.	Exhibits	7

SIGNATURE		8

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST V CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF NET ASSETS (Liquidation Basis) (~~in thousands~~unaudited)

	September 30,			December 31,
	June 30,			December 31,
	2013			2012
	2014			2013
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Total assets		$	-		$	-
LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS
Total liabilities		$	-		$	-
Net assets in liquidation		$	-		$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

Table of Contents

RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST V CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS (Liquidation Basis) (unaudited~~, in thousands, except per share amounts~~)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,					Three Months Ended September 30,
	Three and Six Months Ended June 30,
	2013		2012			2013		2012
	2014		2013
Net assets in liquidation, beginning of period	$	-	$	~~1,011~~-		$	-	$	-
Distributions to shareholders		-		(1,011	)		-		-
Changes in net assets in liquidation		-		-
Net assets in liquidation, end of period	$	-	$	-		$	-	$	-
Distributions per Investor Share	$	-	$	1,087		$	-	$	-

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

Table of Contents

RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST V

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited~~, dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts~~)

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Ridgewood Electric Power Trust V (the "Trust") is a Delaware trust formed on March 14, 1996. The Trust began offering shares of beneficial interest (“Investor Shares”) in April 1996 and concluded its offering in April 1998. The Trust has 932.8877 Investor Shares outstanding. Prior to the adoption of the Trust’s Plan of Dissolution (described below), the objective of the Trust was to provide benefits to its shareholders through a combination of distributions of operating cash flow and capital appreciation. The Managing Shareholder of the Trust is Ridgewood Renewable Power LLC, a New Jersey limited liability company (the “Managing Shareholder”). Historically, the Trust focused primarily on independent power generation facilities, water desalinization plants and other infrastructure projects both in the US and abroad.

On December 22, 2008, the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution of Ridgewood Electric Power Trust V (the “Plan of Dissolution”) became effective. Under the Plan of Dissolution, the business of the Trust shifted, and became limited to the disposal of its remaining assets and resolution of its remaining liabilities. Upon the completion of these activities, if successful, the Managing Shareholder expects to distribute any remaining cash to the Trust’s shareholders and then proceed to terminate the Trust and its reporting obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Trust is required to make adequate provisions to satisfy its known and unknown liabilities, which could substantially delay or limit the Trust’s ability to make future distributions to shareholders. The process of accounting for the Trust’s liabilities, including those that are presently unknown, may involve difficult valuation decisions, which could adversely impact the amount or timing of any future distributions by the Trust.

Under the Plan of Dissolution, the Managing Shareholder has sole authority to conduct the Trust’s dissolution, liquidation and termination without additional shareholder approval. As of the date of issuance of these financial statements, the Trust has not been liquidated, primarily due to on-going matters discussed in Note 3. The Managing Shareholder is unable to estimate when these matters will be resolved and what financial impact the matters will have on the Trust’s net assets or the timing, likelihood or amount of any future distributions to shareholders. It is possible that resolution of the matters discussed in Note 3 could result in a payment to the Trust; however, the Trust does not anticipate making additional distributions until the Trust has completed the liquidation process. At that time, the Trust’s remaining cash, if any, will be distributed to holders of Investor Shares other than any Investor Shares held by the Managing Shareholder or its affiliates. The Trust currently has no cash, and does not expect to have any cash with which to make further distributions to shareholders unless resolution of the matters discussed in Note 3 results in a payment to the Trust.

InThe ~~March~~Trust ~~2012,~~believes ~~the~~that ~~Trust~~it ~~made~~currently ~~distributions~~has access to ~~its~~sufficient ~~shareholders~~resources ofto ~~$1,011,~~meet orits ~~$1,087~~anticipated ~~per Investor Share~~obligations, as ~~a result of~~ the ~~settlement agreement discussed in Note 3. The~~ Managing Shareholder, ~~and~~has ~~its~~agreed ~~affiliates,~~to ~~did~~pay ~~not receive any portion of~~ the ~~distribution,~~on-going ~~including~~normal ~~any~~and ~~distributions~~recurring tooperating ~~Investor~~expenses ~~Shares. It is possible that resolution~~ of the ~~matters~~Trust ~~discussed~~and inwaive ~~Note~~all 3future ~~could~~management ~~result~~fees. ~~in a payment to the Trust; however~~Additionally, the Trust ~~does~~is not ~~anticipate~~paying ~~making~~any ~~additional~~on-going ~~distributions~~expenses ~~until~~regarding the ~~Trust~~matters ~~has~~discussed ~~completed~~in ~~the~~Note ~~liquidation process~~3. AtAs ~~that~~a ~~time~~result, ~~the~~no ~~Trust’s~~ remaining ~~cash,~~estimated ifexpenses ~~any,~~for ~~will~~liquidation behave ~~distributed~~been toreflected ~~holders~~in ofthe ~~Investor~~accompanying ~~Shares~~financial ~~other~~statements ~~than~~of ~~any Investor Shares held by~~ the ~~Managing Shareholder or its affiliates. The~~ Trust ~~currently has no cash,~~ and ~~does~~there ~~not~~was ~~expect~~no tofinancial ~~have~~activity ~~any~~for ~~cash with which to make further distributions to shareholders unless resolution of~~ the three-month ~~matters~~and ~~discussed~~six-month inperiods ended ~~Note~~June 330, ~~results~~2014 inand ~~a payment to the Trust~~2013.

The Trust believes that it currently has access to sufficient resources to meet its anticipated obligations, as the Managing Shareholder has agreed to pay the on-going normal and recurring operating expenses of the Trust and waive all future management fees. Additionally, the Trust is not paying any on-going expenses regarding the matters discussed in Note 3. As a result, no remaining estimated expenses for liquidation have been reflected in the accompanying financial statements of the Trust and there was no financial activity for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013.

The Trust has evaluated subsequent events and transactions through the date of the issuance of its financial statements, and concluded that there were no such events or transactions that require adjustment to, or disclosure in the notes to, the condensed financial statements.

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The ~~accompanying~~ condensed financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared pursuant to the rules of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments that are necessary for a fair presentation of the condensed financial statements for the periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC rules. These condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2012~~2013, filed with the SEC on January 159, ~~2013~~2014 (the “~~2012~~2013 Form 10-K”). No significant changes have been made to the Trust’s accounting policies and estimates disclosed in its ~~2012~~2013 Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST V

NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited~~, dollar amounts in thousands, except per share amounts~~)

The financial statements were prepared on the liquidation basis of accounting. This basis of accounting is considered appropriate when, among other things, liquidation of the Trust is probable. Under this basis of accounting, assets are valued at their estimated net realizable values and liabilities are valued at their estimated settlement amounts. The valuation of assets and liabilities requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions. Upon conversion to the liquidation basis of accounting, the Trust accrued known estimated values of assets expected to be received and known estimated costs expected to be incurred in liquidation. On an on-going basis, the Trust evaluates the estimates and assumptions that can have a significant impact on the Trust’s reported net assets in liquidation. Actual amounts may differ materially and adversely from these estimates.

For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Fund was an “inactive entity” for purposes of the Exchange Act; as a result, the financial statements of the Fund as of December 31, 2013 have not been audited by the Fund’s independent registered public accounting firm.

3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

On March 20, 2007, the Paul Bergeron Trust (“Bergeron”) commenced a derivative action on behalf of the Trust, in Suffolk County Superior Court, Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Bergeron joined the Trust and affiliated entities, including the Managing Shareholder and a person who is an officer of the Managing Shareholder, alleging that the allocation of the proceeds from the sale of certain assets of the Trust and affiliated entities was unfair. The complaint was later amended to substitute other parties as the derivative plaintiffs and to add a claim that the defendants breached fiduciary duties to the Trust and The Ridgewood Power Growth Fund (“Growth Fund”) by forming affiliated funds to finance the expansion of underlying projects in which each of the Trust and Growth Fund had an interest, rather than using alternative financing, which allegedly resulted in a misallocation of sale proceeds. In ~~December~~ 2011, the defendants agreed to a settlement agreement with the derivative plaintiffs~~, subject to approval by the Court~~. The defendants disputed the allegations, asserted that the financing transactions were fair and denied all wrongdoing, but agreed: to a disposition of the matter, which included assigning to the derivative plaintiffs, on behalf of the Trust and Growth Fund, all of the defendants’ rights and claims for coverage from, and any claims for damages against, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (“Liberty”), the Managing Shareholder’s excess insurance carrier. In early 2012, the Court gave its final approval of the settlement. The Court did not determine the merits of the plaintiffs’ allegations, rendered no verdict and the settlement agreement is not an admission of any of the facts alleged by the plaintiffs or of any wrongdoing by the defendants.

·The ~~with~~derivative ~~participation~~plaintiffs ~~from~~are responsible for the ~~Managing~~managing, ~~Shareholder’s~~and ~~primary~~ultimate ~~insurer~~disposition, ~~Twin~~of ~~City~~any ~~Fire~~claims ~~Insurance~~against ~~Company~~Liberty, ~~part~~and ofas a result, the ~~Hartford~~Managing ~~Insurance~~Shareholder ~~Group,~~is not able to ~~cause~~predict when there will be a ~~cash~~resolution ~~payment~~of tothe beclaims, ~~made~~or if such resolution will include a payment to the Trust and Growth Fund. In June 2012, ~~less~~the ~~attorneys’~~derivative ~~fees~~plaintiffs ~~awarded~~filed byan ~~the~~amended ~~court~~claim in Suffolk County Superior Court, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, against Liberty, to pursue claims that were assigned as part of the above-mentioned settlement, including among other things, breach of contract. The plaintiffs’ ~~attorneys~~are seeking the award of damages, interest, costs and aattorney ~~reimbursement~~fees, as well as the authority to enforce the ~~Managing~~2012 ~~Shareholder~~settlement asagreement ~~partial~~against ~~reimbursement~~Liberty. The parties filed cross-motions for ~~operating~~summary ~~expenses~~judgment, ofwhich were heard by the ~~Trust~~Court in March 2013. In August 22, 2013, the Court issued a decision in favor of Liberty and ~~Growth~~ordered ~~Fund~~that the matter be dismissed. In October 2013, the plaintiffs appealed the decision.

· to assign to the derivative plaintiffs, on behalf of the Trust and Growth Fund, all of the defendants’ rights and claims for coverage from, and any claims for damages against, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (“Liberty”), the Managing Shareholder’s excess insurance carrier,

· for the Managing Shareholder and any affiliated entities to waive any rights to any future distributions by the Trust and Growth Fund, and

· for the Managing Shareholder to waive the bulk of the Managing Shareholder’s management fees for 2011, as well as all management fees on a going-forward basis, and for the Managing Shareholder to pay the on-going normal and recurring operating expenses of the Trust and Growth Fund until the two funds are liquidated.

In January 2012, the Court gave its final approval of the settlement. The Court did not determine the merits of the plaintiffs’ allegations, rendered no verdict and the settlement agreement is not an admission of any of the facts alleged by the plaintiffs or of any wrongdoing by the defendants. In March 2012, the cash portion of the settlement was made to the two funds, allocated in accordance with the agreement, and distributions made to their respective shareholders. The amount of cash distributed to the Trust’s shareholders totaled $1,011.

The derivative plaintiffs are responsible for the managing, and ultimate disposition, of any claims against Liberty, and as a result, the Managing Shareholder is not able to predict when there will be a resolution of the claims, or if such resolution will include a payment to the Trust and Growth Fund. In June 2012, the derivative plaintiffs filed an amended claim in Suffolk County Superior Court, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, against Liberty, to pursue claims that were assigned as part of the above-mentioned settlement, including among other things, breach of contract. The plaintiffs are seeking the award of damages, interest, costs and attorney fees, as well as the authority to enforce the January 2012 settlement agreement against Liberty. The parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment, which were heard by the Court on March 14, 2013. On August 22, 2013, the Court issued a decision in favor of Liberty and ordered that the matter be dismissed. In October 2013, the plaintiffs appealed the decision.

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This management’s discussion and analysis of the Trust as of ~~September~~June 30, ~~2013~~2014 is intended to help readers analyze the accompanying condensed financial statements, notes and other information contained in this report. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying condensed financial statements, notes and other information included elsewhere in this report as well as the financial statements, notes and other information and Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in the Trust’s ~~2012~~2013 Form 10-K. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Trust was an “inactive entity” for purposes of the Exchange Act. As a result, the Trust’s financial statements as of December 31, 2013 included in the Trust’s 2013 Form 10-K have not been audited by the Trust’s independent registered public accounting firm.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements discussed in this item and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements generally relate to the Trust’s plans, objectives and expectations for future events and include statements about the Trust’s expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, intentions, assumptions and other statements that are not historical facts. These statements are based upon management’s expectations, opinions and estimates as of the date they are made. Although management believes that the expectations, opinions and estimates reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, such forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties many of which may be beyond the Trust’s control, which could cause actual results, performance and achievements to differ materially from the results, performance and achievements projected, expected, expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Examples of events that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or those anticipated include:

possible contingent liabilities and risks associated with the dissolution and liquidation of the Trust,

costs or liabilities of an unusual or nonrecurring nature incurred during liquidation,

the actual timing of the completion of the liquidation process, including, without limitation, the timing of the resolution of the matters described in Part I, Item 1, Note 3. “Legal Proceedings”, and

the amount, likelihood and timing of liquidating distributions, if any.

Additional information concerning the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements is contained elsewhere in this report and in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in the Trust’s ~~2012~~2013 Form 10-K. Any forward-looking statement that the Trust makes, speaks only as of the date of this report. The Trust undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements or cautionary factors, as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

Liquidation Basis of Accounting

Upon the effectiveness of the Trust’s Plan of Dissolution, the Trust adopted the liquidation basis of accounting. This basis of accounting is considered appropriate when, among other things, liquidation of the Trust is probable. Under this basis of accounting, assets are valued at their estimated net realizable values and liabilities are valued at their estimated settlement amounts. The valuation of assets and liabilities requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The discussion and analysis of the Trust’s financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Trust’s financial statements, which have been prepared in conformity with GAAP. In preparing these financial statements, the Trust is required to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amount of the Trust’s assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, including the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, as well as the reported amounts of changes in net assets. The estimates also affect the reported estimated value of net realizable assets and settlement of liabilities. The Trust evaluates these estimates and assumptions on an on-going basis. The Trust bases its estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on various other factors that the Trust believes to be reasonable at the time the estimates and assumptions are made. However, future events and their effects cannot be predicted with absolute certainty. Therefore, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. Actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions under different circumstances or conditions, and such differences may be material to the financial statements. No significant changes have been made to the Trust’s accounting policies and estimates disclosed in its ~~2012~~2013 Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations and Changes in Financial Condition

Net assets at ~~September~~June 30, ~~2013~~2014 and December 31, ~~2012~~2013 were zero. Since the Managing Shareholder paid the operating expenses of the Trust, no financial activity was reported during the three-month and ~~nine~~six-month ~~months~~periods ended ~~September~~June 30, 2014 and 2013.

Future Liquidity and Capital Resource Requirements

The Managing Shareholder has agreed to pay the on-going normal and recurring operating expenses of the Trust and waive all future management fees. Additionally, the Trust is not paying any on-going expenses regarding the matters described in Part I, Item 1, Note 3. “Legal Proceedings”. As a result, the Trust believes that it has access to sufficient working capital for the next 12 months. The Trust intends to distribute excess cash, if any, to its shareholders after liquidating its remaining assets and satisfying its liabilities.

The Trust currently has no cash, and does not expect to have any cash with which to make further distributions to shareholders unless resolution of the legal matters discussed above results in a payment to the Trust. The Managing Shareholder is unable to predict when or how these matters will be resolved or estimate what financial impact these matters will have on the Trust’s net assets or the timing, likelihood or amount of any distributions to shareholders. The Managing Shareholder, and affiliated entities, have waived any rights to any future distributions by the Trust.

The Trust does not expect to make any distributions to shareholders until the Trust has completed the liquidation process.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

None.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not required.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

In accordance with Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act, the Trust’s management, with the participation of the Trust’s Chief Executive and Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Trust’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based on this evaluation, the Trust’s Chief Executive and Financial Officer concluded that the Trust’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Trust in reports filed pursuant to the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and that information required to be disclosed by the Trust is accumulated and communicated to senior management so as to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Trust’s Chief Executive and Financial Officer has concluded that there ~~was~~has been no change in the Trust's internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended ~~September~~June 30, ~~2013~~2014 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

For a discussion of developments regarding the Trust’s legal proceedings, see Note 3 “Legal Proceedings” in the notes to the condensed financial statements in Part I, Item 1.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Not required

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.		Description

31	*	Certification of Jeffrey H. Strasberg, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Registrant, pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).

32	*	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Jeffrey H. Strasberg, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Registrant.

101.INS	*	XBRL Instance Document.

101.SCH	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.

101.CAL	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.

101.LAB	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.

101.PRE	*	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

*	Filed herewith.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST V
Date: October 29, 2013	By:	/s/ Jeffrey H. Strasberg
Date: July 2, 2014	By:	/s/ Jeffrey H. Strasberg
		Jeffrey H. Strasberg
		Chief Executive and Financial Officer
		(Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)

Filing Compare · RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST V