UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2011
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2012
Or
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _____ to _____

Commission File Number: 0-23432

RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST III

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Delaware		22-3264565
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

500 Delaware Avenue, #1112, Wilmington, DE		19801
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

(302) 888-7444

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Not Applicable

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company þ
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

As of ~~October~~March 31, ~~2011,~~2012 there were 391.8444 Investor Shares outstanding.

Table of Contents

FORM 10-Q
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART I.		FINANCIAL INFORMATION	Page
	Item 1.	Financial Statements	1
	Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	85
	Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	96
	Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	96
PART II.		OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	107
	Item 1A.	Risk Factors	107
	Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	107
	Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	107
	Item 4.	~~(Removed~~Mine ~~and~~Safety ~~Reserved)~~Disclosures	107
	Item 5.	Other Information	107
	Item 6.	Exhibits	107
SIGNATURE			118

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST III
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF NET ASSETS
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF NET ASSETS
(Liquidation Basis)
(in thousands)
	September 30,		December 31,
	March 31,		December 31,
	2011		2010
	2012		2011
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Current assets:
Total assets – cash and cash equivalents	$	1,325	$	1,544
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,540	$	1,289
Buyer holdback receivable		-		541
Other receivable		-		169
Due from affiliates		-		5
Total assets	$	1,540	$	2,004
LIABILITIES AND NET ASSETS
Current liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	~~218~~202	$	~~603~~301
Due to affiliates		328		~~111~~53
Total liabilities	$	~~250~~210	$	~~714~~354
Net assets in liquidation	$	1,~~290~~115	$	1,~~290~~190

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed ~~consolidated~~ financial statements.

Table of Contents

RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST III
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
(Liquidation Basis)
(unaudited, in thousands)
	Nine Months Ended			Three Months Ended
	Three Months Ended March 31,
	September 30, 2011			September 30, 2011
	2012			2011
Net assets in liquidation, beginning of period	$	1,~~290~~190		$	1,290
Changes in net assets in liquidation, net		-			-
Adjustment to estimated liquidation accruals		(75	)		-
Net assets in liquidation, end of period	$	1,~~290~~115		$	1,290

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed ~~consolidated~~ financial statements.

Table of Contents

RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST III
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Going Concern Basis)
(unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)
	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010			Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
Cost of revenues	$	311		$	90
Gross loss		(311	)		(90	)
Operating expenses:
General and administrative expenses		345			97
Management fee to Managing Shareholder		26			9
Total operating expenses		371			106
Loss from operations		(682	)		(196	)
Equity in loss of RILG		(806	)		(206	)
Net loss	$	(1,488	)	$	(402	)
Managing Shareholder - Net loss	$	(15	)	$	(4	)
Shareholders - Net loss		(1,473	)		(398	)
Net loss per Investor Share		(3,759	)		(1,015	)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST III
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(Going Concern Basis)
(unaudited, in thousands)
	Nine Months Ended
	September 30, 2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(39	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year		49
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	10

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST III

NOTES TO CONDENSED ~~CONSOLIDATED~~ FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited, dollar amounts in thousands)

1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Ridgewood Electric Power Trust III (the “Trust”) is a Delaware trust formed on December 6, 1993. The Trust began offering shares of beneficial interest (“Investor Shares”) in January 1994 and concluded its offering in May 1995. The Trust has 391.8444 ~~investor shares of beneficial interest (“~~Investor Shares”) outstanding. Prior to the adoption of the Trust’s Plan of Dissolution (described below), the objective of the Trust was to provide benefits to its shareholders through a combination of distributions of operating cash flow and capital appreciation. The Managing Shareholder of the Trust is Ridgewood Renewable Power LLC, a New Jersey limited liability company (the “Managing Shareholder” ~~or “RRP”~~). Historically, the Trust focused primarily on power generation facilities located in the US.

~~The~~On November 19, 2010, the Plan of Liquidation and Dissolution of Ridgewood Electric Power Trust’s ~~accompanying~~III ~~condensed~~(the ~~consolidated~~“Plan ~~financial~~of ~~statements~~Dissolution”) ~~include~~became effective. Under the ~~accounts~~Plan of Dissolution, the business of the Trust shifted, and became limited to the disposal of its ~~former~~remaining ~~investment~~assets and resolution of its ~~former~~remaining ~~wholly~~liabilities. ~~owned~~Upon ~~subsidiaries,~~the ~~Byron~~completion ~~Power~~of ~~Partners~~these activities, ~~L.P.~~if ~~(“Byron”)~~successful, the Managing Shareholder expects to distribute any remaining cash to the Trust’s shareholders and ~~JRW~~then ~~Associates,~~proceed ~~L.P.~~to ~~(“San~~terminate ~~Joaquin”,~~the Trust and ~~collectively~~its ~~with~~reporting ~~Byron~~obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “~~Norcals~~Exchange Act”). The Trust is required to make adequate provisions to satisfy its known and unknown liabilities, which ~~were~~could ~~abandoned~~substantially ~~and~~delay ~~terminated~~or inlimit ~~December~~the Trust’s ~~2010~~ability to make future distributions to shareholders. The process of accounting for the Trust’s ~~investment~~liabilities, ~~was~~including athose ~~19.6%~~that ~~interest~~are inpresently ~~Rhode~~unknown, ~~Island~~may ~~LFG~~involve ~~Genco,~~difficult ~~LLC~~valuation ~~(“RILG”)~~decisions, which ~~was~~could ~~sold~~adversely inimpact ~~November~~the amount ~~2010~~or timing of any future distributions by the Trust.

OnUnder ~~November~~the ~~19,~~Plan ~~2010~~of Dissolution, the Managing Shareholder has sole authority to conduct the Trust’s dissolution, ~~Ridgewood~~liquidation ~~Electric~~and ~~Power~~termination ~~Trust~~without Iadditional ~~(“Trust~~shareholder ~~I”)~~approval. ~~(through~~See ~~its~~Note ~~100%~~4 ~~ownership~~below offor ~~Ridgewood~~a ~~Olinda~~discussion ~~LLC),~~of ~~Ridgewood~~pending ~~Electric~~matters ~~Power~~involving the Trust’s IVformer ~~(“Trust~~California ~~IV”)~~cogeneration ~~and~~projects. ~~Ridgewood~~As ~~Power~~of Bthe ~~Fund/Providence~~date ~~Expansion~~of ~~(“B~~the ~~Fund”,~~issuance ~~and~~of ~~together~~its ~~with~~financial statements, the Trust has not been liquidated, ~~Trust~~primarily Idue to these pending matters. The Managing Shareholder is unable to estimate when these matters will be resolved and what ultimate impact they will have on the Trust’s ~~IV,~~net assets or the ~~“Trusts”)~~timing, ~~sold~~likelihood ~~all~~or amount of ~~their~~any ~~respective~~future ~~limited~~distributions ~~liability~~to ~~company~~shareholders. ~~membership~~The ~~interests in~~Trust ~~RILG~~does tonot ~~Broadrock~~anticipate ~~Biopower~~any Ifurther ~~LLC~~distributions (until these matters have been resolved and the ~~“Buyer”),~~Trust anhas ~~entity~~completed ~~affiliated~~the ~~with~~liquidation ~~Macquarie~~process, ~~Group~~at ~~Limited~~which time, anthe ~~Australian~~Trust’s ~~based~~remaining ~~international~~cash, ~~company~~if any, aswill ~~further~~be ~~discussed~~distributed into ~~Note~~its 4shareholders.

~~The~~For ~~Norcals~~the ~~suspended their~~purposes ~~operations~~of in the ~~fourth~~Trust’s ~~quarter~~estimates of ~~2008~~fees asand ~~the~~expenses ~~estimated~~to ~~incremental~~be ~~cost~~incurred ofduring ~~production~~liquidation, ~~exceeded~~management ~~the~~has ~~estimated~~assumed ~~revenues~~that ~~from~~the ~~electricity~~liquidation ~~sales. In~~of ~~2009,~~the ~~due~~Trust towill ~~continued~~be ~~projected~~completed ~~operating~~by ~~losses~~June 30, ~~the~~2012. ~~Managing~~If ~~Shareholder~~the ~~shut~~liquidation ~~down~~of the ~~operations~~Trust ofis ~~the~~not ~~Norcals.~~completed Inby ~~December~~that ~~2010~~date, the ~~Trust~~actual ~~abandoned~~expenses ~~and~~that ~~terminated~~ the ~~entities~~Trust ~~involved~~will inincur ~~its~~will ~~investments~~likely ~~in the Norcals~~increase.

OnThe ~~November~~Trust ~~19,~~has ~~2010,~~evaluated ~~the~~subsequent ~~date~~events ~~of the sale of RILG, the Plan of Liquidation~~ and ~~Dissolution~~transactions ofthrough ~~Ridgewood Electric Power Trust III (~~the ~~“Plan~~date of ~~Dissolution”) became effective. Under~~ the ~~Plan~~issuance of ~~Dissolution, the business of the Trust shifted, and became limited to the disposal of~~ its ~~remaining~~financial ~~assets and resolution of its remaining liabilities. Upon the completion of these activities~~statements, ~~if successful, the Managing Shareholder expects to distribute any remaining cash to the Trust’s shareholders~~ and ~~then~~concluded ~~proceed~~that tothere ~~terminate~~were ~~the~~no ~~Trust~~such ~~and~~events ~~its~~or ~~reporting~~transactions ~~obligations~~that ~~under~~require ~~the~~adjustment ~~Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). The Trust is required~~ to ~~make adequate provisions to satisfy its known and unknown liabilities~~, ~~which could substantially delay~~ or ~~limit~~disclosure in the ~~Trust’s~~ ~~ability~~notes to ~~make future distributions to shareholders. The process of accounting for the Trust’s liabilities~~, ~~including those that are presently unknown, may involve difficult valuation decisions, which could adversely impact~~ the ~~amount~~ orcondensed ~~timing~~financial ~~of any future distributions by the Trust~~statements.

Under the Plan of Dissolution, the Managing Shareholder has sole authority to conduct the Trust’s dissolution, liquidation and termination without additional shareholder approval. As of November 14, 2011, the Trust has not been liquidated, primarily due to matters discussed in Note 5. “Commitments and Contingencies”. The Managing Shareholder is unable to estimate when these matters will be resolved and what ultimate impact they will have on the Trust’s net assets and the timing of any distributions to shareholders. The Trust does not anticipate any distributions until these matters have been resolved and the Trust has completed the liquidation process, at which time, the Trust’s remaining cash, if any, will be distributed to its shareholders.

For the purposes of the Trust’s estimates of fees and expenses to be incurred during liquidation, management has assumed that the liquidation of the Trust will be completed by March 31, 2012. If the liquidation of the Trust is not completed by that date, the actual expenses that the Trust will incur will likely increase.

The Trust has evaluated subsequent events and transactions through the date of the issuance of its financial statements, and concluded that there were no such events or transactions that require adjustment to, or disclosure in the notes to, the condensed consolidated financial statements.

2. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying condensed ~~consolidated~~ financial statements are unaudited and have been prepared pursuant to the rules of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments that are necessary for a fair presentation of the condensed ~~consolidated~~ financial statements for the periods presented. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in ~~consolidated~~ financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to SEC rules. These condensed ~~consolidated~~ financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Trust’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, ~~2010~~2011, filed with the SEC on February 2529, ~~2011~~2012 (the “~~2010~~2011 Form 10-K”). No significant changes have been made to the Trust’s accounting policies and estimates disclosed in its ~~2010~~2011 Form 10-K.

5Upon the effectiveness of the Trust’s Plan of Dissolution, the Trust adopted the liquidation basis of accounting. This basis of accounting is considered appropriate when, among other things, liquidation of the Trust is probable. Under this basis of accounting, assets are valued at their estimated net realizable values and liabilities are valued at their estimated settlement amounts. The valuation of assets and liabilities requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions. On an on-going basis, the Trust evaluates the estimates and assumptions that can have a significant impact on the Trust’s reported net assets in liquidation. Actual amounts may differ materially and adversely from these estimates. If there are delays in liquidating the Trust, actual costs incurred during the liquidation process would likely increase, reducing net assets available in liquidation and for future distributions to shareholders.

During the first quarter of 2012, the Trust increased its estimated liquidation accruals by $75, to cover estimated increases in expenses associated with resolving the matters discussed in Note 4.

Table of Contents

RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST III

NOTES TO CONDENSED ~~CONSOLIDATED~~ FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited, dollar amounts in thousands)

Upon conversion to the liquidation basis of accounting, the Trust accrued known estimated values of assets expected to be received and known estimated costs expected to be incurred in liquidation. On an ongoing basis, the Trust evaluates the estimates and assumptions that can have a significant impact on the Trust’s reported net assets in liquidation. Actual amounts may differ materially and adversely from these estimates. If there are delays in liquidating the Trust, actual costs incurred during the liquidation process would increase, reducing net assets available in liquidation and for future distributions to shareholders.

3. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

The Trust considers all highly liquid investments with maturities, when purchased, of three months or less as cash and cash equivalents. At ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012, cash and cash equivalents did not exceed federal insured limits.

4. ~~INVESTMENT~~COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

OnIn ~~November~~February ~~19,~~and October 2010, Byron Power Partners, L.P. (“Byron”) and JRW Associates, L.P. (“San Joaquin”, and collectively with Byron, the ~~Trusts~~“Norcals”), ~~sold~~which ~~all~~were prior investments of ~~their~~the ~~respective~~Trust ~~limited~~that ~~liability~~were ~~company~~abandoned ~~membership~~and ~~interests~~terminated in ~~RILG~~December to2010, received notices from Pacific Gas & Electric Company (“PG&E”), the ~~Buyer~~Norcals’ ~~for~~sole ancustomer, ~~initial~~in ~~aggregate~~which ~~gross~~PG&E ~~sale~~alleged ~~price~~that ofSan Joaquin and Byron owe PG&E $186,~~704~~329 and $2,966, ofrespectively, ~~which~~due $3to,~~666~~ ~~was~~among ~~allocated~~other things, each facility failing to ~~the~~deliver ~~Trust.~~power ~~The~~under ~~initial~~its ~~gross~~respective ~~sale~~power ~~price~~purchase ~~included~~agreements $1with PG&E. In addition,~~010~~ inthe ~~estimated~~Norcals ~~net~~were ~~working~~tenants ~~capital~~under oftwo ~~RILG,~~long-term ~~which~~non-cancelable ~~was~~ground ~~subject~~leases. toSan ~~adjustment~~Joaquin ~~within~~and ~~90 days~~Byron ~~following~~have ~~the~~not ~~closing,~~paid torent ~~reflect~~since ~~the~~December ~~difference~~2009 ~~between~~and ~~estimated~~November 2010, respectively. San Joaquin and ~~actual~~Byron ~~net~~each ~~working~~received ~~capital~~notice atasserting ~~closing~~that it was in default under its respective lease.

InPrior ~~connection~~to ~~with~~their ~~the~~termination, ~~indemnification~~neither ~~obligations~~San ofJoaquin ~~the~~nor ~~Trusts~~Byron ~~under~~had the ~~interest~~ability ~~purchase~~to ~~agreement~~pay ~~for~~ the ~~RILG~~amounts ~~sale,~~claimed ~~the~~to ~~Buyer~~be ~~held~~owed ~~back~~to ~~$3,000~~PG&E ofor the ~~gross~~Norcals’ ~~sale~~landlords. ~~price~~As ofthese ~~RILG,~~potential ofliabilities ~~which~~are ~~$588~~of ~~was~~the ~~allocated~~Norcals, toand not the Trust, ~~for~~the aTrust ~~period~~has ofnot ~~9 months~~recorded ~~after~~any ~~the~~potential ~~closing~~liabilities ofin ~~the~~its ~~sale~~financial statements. ~~Subsequent~~In ~~to year-end~~2011, ~~the~~San ~~estimated~~Joaquin ~~working~~entered ~~capital~~into ~~calculation~~an ~~for~~agreement ~~RILG~~with ~~was~~its ~~finalized~~landlord, ~~resulting~~at inno ~~$238~~cost ~~being owed~~ to the ~~Buyer~~Trust, ofreleasing ~~which $47 was allocated to~~ the Trust. ~~The~~and ~~working~~San ~~capital~~Joaquin, ~~adjustment~~among ~~resulted~~others, infrom aany ~~reduction~~claims ofregarding ~~the~~San ~~Buyer~~Joaquin’s ~~holdback~~nonpayment ~~amount to $2,762,~~ of ~~which~~rent. ~~$541~~The ~~was allocated to the~~ Trust. Inhas ~~August~~initiated ~~2011, as final~~ settlement ofdiscussions ~~the~~with ~~holdback amount, $540 was received by~~ the ~~Trust~~Byron landlord.

~~Summarized~~In ~~statements~~November 2011, the Norcals, the Trust and PG&E reached a tentative settlement of ~~operations~~all ~~data~~claims ~~for~~against ~~RILG for~~each other, at no material cost to the ~~nine~~Trust. ~~and~~That ~~three~~settlement ~~months~~must ~~ended~~be ~~September~~approved 30by the California Public Utilities Commission, ~~2010~~which approval was requested by PG&E in November 2011. The Managing Shareholder cannot predict whether or when the approval of the settlement by the California Public Utilities Commission will be obtained. If PG&E or the Byron landlord were asto ~~follows:~~commence legal proceedings against the Trust, this would delay, and could reduce or eliminate, any further distributions to shareholders and would delay the dissolution and liquidation of the Trust. If PG&E were to succeed in a claim that the Trust is obligated to pay the claimed amounts, the Trust likely would not have the ability to pay the claim. As of the issuance of these financial statements, neither PG&E nor the Byron landlord has commenced any legal proceedings against the Trust or the terminated Norcals.

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010			Three Months Ended September 30, 2010
Revenues	$	8,229		$	3,070
Gross loss		(722	)		(743	)
Loss from operations		(4,119	)		(1,053	)
Net loss		(4,119	)		(1,054	)
Trust share of loss in RILG		(806	)		(206	)

5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

In February and October 2010, the Norcals received notices from Pacific Gas & Electric Company (“PG&E”), the Norcals’ sole customer, in which PG&E alleged that San Joaquin and Byron owe PG&E $6,329 and $2,966, respectively, due to, among other things, each facility failing to deliver power under its respective power sale agreement with PG&E. In addition, the Norcals were tenants under two long-term non-cancelable ground leases with aggregate future minimum lease payments of approximately $1,840. San Joaquin and Byron did not pay rent from December 2009 and November 2010, respectively, through the date they were terminated. Each of San Joaquin and Byron received notice asserting that it was in default under its respective lease.

Table of Contents

RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST III

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited, dollar amounts in thousands)

Prior to their termination, neither San Joaquin nor Byron had the ability to pay the amounts claimed to be owed to PG&E or the Norcals’ landlords. As a result, in December 2010, letters were sent to these potential creditors notifying them that the Norcals and their general partners were being abandoned and dissolved.

As these potential liabilities were of the Norcals, and not the Trust, the Trust did not record any potential liabilities in its financial statements. During the second quarter of 2011, the Trust entered into an agreement with the landlord of San Joaquin, at no cost to the Trust, releasing the Trust from any claims regarding San Joaquin’s nonpayment of rents. If PG&E or the Byron landlord were to commence legal proceedings against the Trust, this would delay, and could reduce, any further distributions to shareholders of the Trust and would delay the dissolution and liquidation of the Trust. If PG&E were to succeed in a claim against the Trust, the Trust likely would not have the ability to pay the amounts claimed. As of the issuance of these financial statements, neither PG&E nor the Byron landlord has commenced any legal proceedings against the Trust or the terminated Norcals. The Managing Shareholder is in discussions with both PG&E and the Byron landlord to resolve these matters without material cost to the Trust.

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This management’s discussion and analysis of the Trust as of ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 is intended to help readers analyze the accompanying condensed ~~consolidated~~ financial statements, notes and other information contained in this report. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the accompanying condensed ~~consolidated~~ financial statements, notes and other information included elsewhere in this report as well as the ~~consolidated~~ financial statements, notes and other information and Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included in the Trust’s ~~2010~~2011 Form 10-K.

Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements discussed in this item and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements generally relate to the Trust’s plans, objectives and expectations for future events and include statements about the Trust’s expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, intentions, assumptions and other statements that are not historical facts. These statements are based upon management’s expectations, opinions and estimates as of the date they are made. Although management believes that the expectations, opinions and estimates reflected in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, such forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks and uncertainties many of which may be beyond the Trust’s control, which could cause actual results, performance and achievements to differ materially from the results, performance and achievements projected, expected, expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. Examples of events that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results or those anticipated include:

	·	possible contingent liabilities and risks associated with the dissolution and liquidation of the Trust, including, without limitation, settlement of the Trust’s liabilities and obligations,
	·	adverse developments or delays with respect to the resolution of the matters described in Part I, Item 1, Note 5 “Commitments and Contingencies” of this report,

	·	possible contingent liabilities and risks associated with the dissolution and liquidation of the Trust, including, without limitation, settlement of the Trust’s liabilities and obligations,
	·	adverse developments or delays with respect to the resolution of the matters described in Part I, Item 1, Note 4. “Commitments and Contingencies” of this report,
	·	costs incurred in connection with the carrying out of the plan of liquidation and dissolution of the Trust,
	·	the actual timing of the completion of the liquidation process, including, without limitation, any delay in the liquidation of the Trust caused by any adverse developments or delays regarding the resolution of the matters described in Part I, Item 1, Note 4. “Commitments and Contingencies” of this report, and
	·	the amount and timing of liquidating distributions, if any

	·	costs incurred in connection with the carrying out of the plan of liquidation and dissolution of the Trust,
	·	the actual timing of the completion of the liquidation process, including, without limitation, any delay in the liquidation of the Trust caused by any adverse developments or delays regarding the resolution of the matters described in Part I, Item 1, Note 5 “Commitments and Contingencies” of this report, and

Additional information concerning the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements is contained elsewhere in this report and in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in the Trust’s 2011 Form 10-K. Any forward-looking statement that the Trust makes, speaks only as of the date of this report. The Trust undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements or cautionary factors, as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

· the amount and timing of liquidating distributions, if any.

Additional information concerning the factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements is contained elsewhere in this report and in Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and elsewhere in the Trust’s 2010 Form 10-K. Any forward-looking statement that the Trust makes, speaks only as of the date of this report. The Trust undertakes no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements or cautionary factors, as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

Liquidation Basis of Accounting

The Trust’s condensed consolidated financial statements for periods prior to November 20, 2010 were prepared on the going concern basis of accounting, which contemplates realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. Upon the effectiveness of the Trust’s Plan of Dissolution, the Trust ~~began~~adopted ~~preparing its consolidated financial statements on~~ the liquidation basis of accounting. This basis of accounting is considered appropriate when, among other things, liquidation of the Trust is probable. Under this basis of accounting, assets are valued at their estimated net realizable values and liabilities are valued at their estimated settlement amounts. The valuation of assets and liabilities requires management to make significant estimates and assumptions. On an on-going basis, the Trust evaluates the estimates and assumptions that could have a significant impact on the Trust’s reported net assets in liquidation. Actual amounts may differ materially and adversely from these estimates. If there are delays in liquidating the Trust, actual costs incurred during the liquidation process would likely increase, reducing net assets available in liquidation and for future distributions to shareholders.

Upon conversion to the liquidation basis of accounting, the Trust accrued known estimated values of assets expected to be received and known estimated costs expected to be incurred during liquidation. On an ongoing basis, the Trust evaluates the estimates and assumptions that could have a significant impact on the Trust’s reported net assets in liquidation. Actual amounts may differ materially and adversely from these estimates. If there are delays in liquidating the Trust, actual costs incurred during the liquidation process would increase, reducing net assets available in liquidation and for future distributions to shareholders.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The discussion and analysis of the Trust’s financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Trust’s condensed ~~consolidated~~ financial statements, which have been prepared in conformity with GAAP. In preparing these financial statements, the Trust is required to make certain estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect the reported amount of the Trust’s assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, including the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, as well as the reported amounts of changes in net assets. The estimates also affect the reported estimated value of net realizable assets and settlement of liabilities. The Trust evaluates these estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. The Trust bases its estimates and assumptions on historical experience and on various other factors that the Trust believes to be reasonable at the time the estimates and assumptions are made. However, future events and their effects cannot be predicted with absolute certainty. Therefore, the determination of estimates requires the exercise of judgment. Actual results may differ from these estimates and assumptions under different circumstances or conditions, and such differences may be material to the condensed ~~consolidated~~ financial statements. No material changes have been made to the Trust’s critical accounting policies and estimates disclosed in its ~~2010~~2011 Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

Results of Operations and Changes in Financial Condition

AsNet ~~the~~assets ~~Trust~~at ~~adopted~~March ~~the~~30, ~~liquidation~~2012 ~~basis~~were $1,115,000, a decrease of ~~accounting~~$75,000 ~~effective~~from ~~November~~net 20assets of $1,190,000 ~~2010~~at December 31, ~~any~~2011. ~~costs~~This ~~incurred~~decrease ~~and~~is ~~income~~primarily ~~received~~due ~~since~~to ~~then~~increased ~~will~~estimated beliquidation ~~included~~expenses inassociated with resolving the ~~condensed~~pending ~~consolidated~~Norcals ~~statements~~matters ofas ~~changes~~discussed in ~~net~~Part ~~assets~~I, Item 1, Note 4. “Commitment and Contingencies” of this report.

Net assets at September 30, 2011 was $1.3 million, unchanged from net assets at both December 31, 2010 and June 30, 2011 as the Trust’s estimates of total liquidation accruals, on a net basis, did not significantly change during the quarter. During the quarter, the Trust’s cash balances ~~increased~~decreased $~~420~~219,000 to $1,~~540~~325,000 asat aMarch ~~result~~31, of2012 ~~receipt~~as ofa ~~the~~result ~~landfill holdback amount~~ of ~~$540,000 and~~ payment of Trust liabilities, including the payment of management fees to the Managing Shareholder of ~~$11,000.~~approximately ~~For the nine months ended September 30, 2011, management fees paid to the Manager Shareholder totaled~~ $338,000.

For the purposes of the Trust’s estimates of fees and expenses to be incurred during liquidation, management has assumed that the liquidation of the Trust will ~~now~~ be completed by ~~March~~June 3130, 2012. If the liquidation of the Trust is not completed by that date, the actual expenses that the Trust will incur will likely increase. A delay in the liquidation of the Trust could result from, among other things, not resolving the matters discussed in Note 54. “Commitments and Contingencies” of Part I, Item 1 of this report. Any additional, unanticipated expenses of the Trust, including expenses related to the resolution of the matters discussed in Note 54. “Commitments and Contingencies” of Part I, Item 1 of this report, also would likely increase the expenses of the Trust in liquidation.

The condensed consolidated statements of operations and the statement of cash flows are presented on a going concern basis of accounting and therefore only include results for the nine and three months ended September 30, 2010 and as a result, no comparative discussion is presented.

Future Liquidity and Capital Resource Requirements

The Trust believes it has sufficient cash and cash equivalents to provide working capital to complete the liquidation of the Trust. The Trust intends to distribute excess cash, if any, to its shareholders after liquidating its assets and satisfying its liabilities.

The Trust does not ~~expect~~anticipate ~~to make~~ any further distributions to shareholders until ~~matters relative to~~ the ~~Norcals~~Trust ~~discussed~~has incompleted ~~Note~~the 5.liquidation ~~“Commitments and Contingencies” of Part I, Item 1 of this report are resolved~~process.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

None.

Commitments and Contingencies

For a discussion regarding the Norcals, see Note 54. “Commitments and Contingencies” inof ~~the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements in~~ Part I, Item 1 of this report.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not required.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

In accordance with Rule 13a-15(b) of the Exchange Act, the Trust’s management, with the participation of the Trust’s Chief Executive and Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Trust’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based on this evaluation, the Trust’s Chief Executive and Financial Officer concluded that the Trust’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Trust in reports filed pursuant to the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms and that information required to be disclosed by the Trust is accumulated and communicated to senior management so as to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Table of Contents

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

The Trust’s Chief Executive and Financial Officer has concluded that there was no change in the Trust's internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) ~~under~~of the Exchange Act) that occurred during the quarter ended ~~September~~March 3031, ~~2011~~2012 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Trust’s internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

Not required.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. ~~(REMOVED~~MINE ~~AND~~SAFETY ~~RESERVED)~~DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

Exhibit No.		Description
31	*	Certification of Jeffrey H. Strasberg, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Registrant, pursuant to Securities Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a).
32	*	Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, signed by Jeffrey H. Strasberg, Chief Executive and Financial Officer of the Registrant.
101.INS	*#	XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH	*#	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL	*#	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF	*#	XBRL Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB	*#	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE	*#	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.

*	Filed herewith.

Under Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this exhibit is deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under those sections.

107

Table of Contents

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST III
Date: November 14, 2011	By:	/s/ Jeffrey H. Strasberg
Date: April 13, 2012	By:	/s/ Jeffrey H. Strasberg
		Jeffrey H. Strasberg
		Chief Executive and Financial Officer
		(Principal Executive, Financial and Accounting Officer)

Filing Compare · RIDGEWOOD ELECTRIC POWER TRUST III