UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

þ ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, ~~2008~~2009

¨ TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ______________ to ________________

Commission file number 333-148716

E-18 CORP.
PROTECTUS MEDICAL DEVICES, INC..
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware		98-0541881
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
26 Leon Blum Street Tel Aviv, Israel, 69052		69052
110 First Avenue NE, Suite #1006 Minneapolis, MN		55413
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)
011-972-54-263-7308
612-379-3975
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

N/A		N/A
Title of each Class		Name of each exchange on which registered

Securities registered pursuant to section 12(g) of the Act:

Shares of Common Stock, $0.0001 par value
Title of Class

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ

Table of Contents

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes  No 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer ¨

Accelerated filer ¨

Non-accelerated filer ¨

Smaller reporting company þ

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes þ¨ No ¨þ

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of December 31, ~~2008~~2009, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed fourth fiscal quarter, was approximately $150,000.

The number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of common stock, as of ~~February~~May 213, ~~2009~~2010, was 545,~~000~~925,000 shares of common stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

~~Exhibits incorporated by reference are referred under Part IV~~None.

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
FORM 10-K		1
PART I		4
ITEM 1.	BUSINESS	41
ITEM 2.	PROPERTIES	118
ITEM 3.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	118
ITEM 4.	~~SUBMISSION~~REMOVED OFAND ~~MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS~~RESERVED	118
PART II		12
ITEM 5.	MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES	129
ITEM 6.	SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA	1210
ITEM 7.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	1310
ITEM 7A.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	1713
ITEM 8.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA	17F-
ITEM 9.	CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE	1715
ITEM 9A.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	1715
ITEM 9B.	OTHER INFORMATION	1815
PART III		18
ITEM 10.	DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE	1816
ITEM 11.	EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	2019
ITEM 12.	SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS	2120
ITEM 13.	CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE	2321
ITEM 14.	PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES	2421
PART IV		24
ITEM 15.	EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES	2422
SIGNATURES		25

2Table of Contents

Forward Looking Statements

This ~~annual~~ ~~report~~Form ~~contains forward~~10-~~looking~~K ~~statements~~and ~~within~~other ~~the~~reports ~~meaning~~filed ofby ~~Section 27A~~Registrant offrom time to time with the Securities ~~Act of~~and ~~1933,~~Exchange asCommission ~~amended~~ (collectively the “~~Securities Act~~Filings”) ~~and~~contain ~~Section~~or ~~21E~~may ofcontain ~~the~~forward ~~Securities~~looking ~~Exchange~~statements ~~Act~~and ~~of 1934,~~information asthat ~~amended~~are ~~(the~~based ~~“Exchange~~upon ~~Act”).~~beliefs ~~These~~of, ~~forward-looking~~and ~~statements~~information ~~relate~~ currently available to, ~~future~~Registrant's ~~events~~management oras ~~our~~well ~~future~~as ~~financial~~estimates ~~performance.~~and Inassumptions ~~some~~made ~~cases,~~by ~~you~~Registrant's ~~can identify~~management. ~~forward-looking~~When ~~statements~~used byin ~~terminology~~the ~~such~~filings asthe ~~“may”,~~words “~~should~~anticipate”, ~~“expects”,~~ “~~plans~~believe”, “~~anticipates~~estimate”, “~~believes~~expect”, “~~estimates~~future”, “~~predicts~~intend”, ~~“potential”~~ or “~~continue~~plan” or the negative of these terms and similar expressions as they relate to Registrant or ~~other~~Registrant's ~~comparable terminology.~~management ~~These~~identify forward- looking statements. ~~are~~Such ~~only~~statements ~~predictions~~reflect ~~and~~the ~~involve known~~current view of Registrant with respect to future events and ~~unknown~~are subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors, (including the risks ~~set~~ ~~out~~contained in the section of this report entitled “Risk Factors”) inrelating ~~the~~to ~~Registration~~Registrant's ~~Statement~~industry, ~~on Form~~Registrant's ~~SB-2~~operations ~~that~~and ~~went~~results ~~effective as~~ of ~~February~~operations ~~15, 2008~~ and ~~the risks set out below,~~ any ofbusinesses ~~which~~that may ~~cause~~be ~~our~~acquired orby ~~our~~Registrant. ~~industry’s~~Should ~~actual~~one ~~results,~~or ~~levels~~more of ~~activity,~~ ~~performance~~these risks or ~~achievements~~uncertainties tomaterialize, beor ~~materially~~should ~~different~~the ~~from~~underlying ~~any~~assumptions ~~future results,~~prove ~~levels of activity~~incorrect, ~~performance~~actual orresults ~~achievements~~may ~~expressed~~differ orsignificantly ~~implied~~from ~~by these~~those ~~forward-looking~~anticipated, ~~statements.~~believed, ~~These~~estimated, ~~risks include~~expected, byintended ~~way~~or ~~of example and not in limitation:~~planned.

·Although ~~risks~~Registrant ~~related~~believes that the expectations reflected in the forward looking statements are reasonable, Registrant cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, Registrant does not intend to ~~our~~update ~~ability~~any of the forward-looking statements to ~~continue~~conform asthese astatements ~~going~~to ~~concern;~~actual results. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with Registrant's pro forma financial statements and the related notes that will be filed herein.

·In ~~the~~this ~~uncertainty~~Form of8-K, ~~profitability~~references ~~based~~to ~~upon~~“we,” “our,” ~~history~~“us,” of“our ~~losses;~~company,” “Protectus Medical” or the “Registrant” refer to Protectus Medical Devices, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and its subsidiaries.

· risks related to failure to obtain adequate financing on a timely basis and on acceptable terms for our planned development projects;

· risks related to environmental regulation and liability;

· risks related to tax assessments;

· risks and uncertainties related to our prospects, properties and business strategy; and

· risks related to our offices and business located in Israel.

The above list is not an exhaustive list of the factors that may affect any of our forward-looking statements. These and other factors should be considered carefully and readers should not place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements.

Forward looking statements are made based on management’s beliefs, estimates and opinions on the date the forward-looking statements are made, and we undertake no obligation to update forward-looking statements should these beliefs, estimates and opinions or other circumstances change. Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these forward-looking statements to actual results.

Our financial statements are stated in United States dollars (“US$”) and are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).

In this annual report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States dollars and all references to "common stock" refer to the shares of our common stock.

As used in this annual report, the terms "we", "us", "our", "E-18" and “Issuer” mean E-18 Corp. unless the context clearly requires otherwise.

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

~~Form~~We were incorporated on June 28, 2007 in the State of Delaware under the name “E-18 Corp.” We entered into a share exchange agreement (the “Share Exchange Agreement”) with SquareOne Medical, Inc. (“SquareOne”), a Nevada company, and ~~year~~the shareholders of ~~organization~~ SquareOne (the “SquareOne Shareholders”) on June 25, 2009 (the “Closing Date”). On the Closing Date, pursuant to the terms of the Share Exchange Agreement, we acquired all of the issued and outstanding common stock of SquareOne from the SquareOne Shareholders. In exchange, we issued to the SquareOne Shareholders, their designees or assigns, 35,000,000 shares of our common stock. In addition, at the Closing Date, Hadas Yaron and Yosef Itamar Krytman, our former officers and directors, and Avraham Yoel Zeitlin, our principal shareholder, cancelled a total number of 15,000,000 shares of our common stock. As a result of the cancellation, the 35,000,000 shares represent approximately 77.78% of our common stock issued and outstanding after the closing of the share exchange transaction contemplated under the Share Exchange Agreement (the “Share Transaction”). As a result of the Share Transaction, SquareOne became our wholly-owned subsidiary.

WeOperating ~~were incorporated~~through onSquareOne, ~~June~~we ~~28,~~are ~~2007,~~engaged in ~~the~~developing ~~State~~and ofmarketing ~~Delaware.~~a ~~Our~~new ~~authorized~~self-sheathing ~~capital consists~~safety ofhypodermic ~~150,000,000~~syringe ~~shares of our common stock~~ (the “~~Common~~SquareOne ~~Shares~~Safety Syringe”) ~~with~~that ~~a par~~can ~~value~~potentially ofreduce ~~$0.0001~~accidental ~~per~~needlestick ~~Common Share~~injuries.

~~Our principal~~According ~~executive~~to ~~offices~~Occupational ~~are~~Safety ~~located~~and Health Administration (OSHA), needlestick injuries expose millions of healthcare workers to bloodborne pathogens and such healthcare workers are at 26risk ~~Leon~~of ~~Blum~~occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens, ~~Tel~~which ~~Aviv~~includes Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), ~~Israel~~Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), ~~Israel~~ ~~69052~~Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) and others. After an injection, the blood remaining on and in the needle may contain dangerous and life-threatening viruses, such as HIV, HAV, HBV, HCV, etc. ~~Our~~Federal ~~telephone~~law ~~number~~and ~~is 011~~institutional policy require healthcare workers to properly and safely dispose of these contaminated devices according to specified procedures. Nonetheless, during the disposal process, unprotected needles can and do cause needlestick injuries, resulting in 600,000 to 1 million of needlestick injuries per year, which, in turn, have led to tens of thousands of cases of HIV, HBV and other infections. Needlestick injuries are highly underreported; in fact, experts in the field have estimated that only one-~~972~~third of all needlestick incidents are being reported (see Kalorama Information “Needle-~~545-263-7308~~Free Drug Injection and Safety Syringes”).

~~Our Common Shares are traded on the over-the-counter market and quoted on the over-the-counter bulletin board (the “OTCBB”) under the symbol “ETEN.OB”.~~1

~~Bankruptcy,~~Table ~~Receivership~~of ~~or Similar Proceeding~~Contents

WeTo ~~have never~~reduce ~~declared~~these ~~bankruptcy~~accidental needlestick injuries, ~~have~~the ~~never~~applicable ~~been~~federal law and OSHA regulations now mandate healthcare providers to use safer syringes in ~~receivership~~all applications, such as automatic, self-sheathing hypodermic syringes. The SquareOne Safety Syringe uses an innovative and ~~have~~patented ~~never~~safety ~~been involved~~syringe indesign ~~any~~meeting ~~legal~~all ~~actions~~criteria orestablished ~~proceedings~~by OSHA regulations for such safety syringes, especially the automatic, self-sheathing criteria.

~~Business of~~Applicable ~~Issuer~~Federal Laws and Regulations

~~Our~~Federal ~~Principal Service~~laws and regulations on reducing and minimizing bloodborne pathogens have expensed years of development. Adopted on March 6, 1992, OSHA regulations require healthcare providers to implement engineering controls to minimize exposure to bloodborne pathogens, and “engineering controls” was defined as controls (e.g. sharps disposal containers, self-sheathing needles) that isolate or remove the bloodborne pathogens hazard from the work place.

WeMandated ~~are~~by ~~a development~~the ~~stage~~Needlestick ~~company. The~~Safety ~~purpose~~and ofprevention ~~our~~Act, ~~company~~changes is to ~~market and~~OSHA’s ~~sell~~bloodborne ~~consumer~~pathogens ~~biodiesel~~standard ~~home~~were ~~processing~~published ~~kits to customers~~ in ~~warm~~the ~~climates where~~Federal ~~the~~Register ~~raw~~on ~~materials~~January ~~for~~18, ~~biodiesel~~2001 ~~production~~(See ~~are~~CFR ~~readily~~Part ~~available~~1910.1030) and ~~cost effective,~~took ~~and~~effect ~~where~~on ~~the~~April ~~temperate~~18, ~~climate~~2001, ~~will~~which ~~eliminate~~now ~~the~~requires ~~danger~~healthcare ofproviders ~~the temperature~~to ~~reaching~~maintain ~~the~~a ~~freeze~~log ~~point~~of orinjuries ~~cloud~~from ~~point~~contaminated ~~concerns (CFPP). Because~~sharps, ~~the~~and ~~use~~document ofconsideration ~~these~~and ~~home~~implementation ~~processing~~of ~~kits~~appropriate iscommercially ~~barely~~available ~~in use~~and ineffective ~~Israel,~~engineering ~~the~~controls ~~primary~~designed ~~focus~~to ofeliminate ~~our~~or ~~business~~minimize atexposure. ~~this~~Thereby, ~~stage~~safer ~~has~~sharps ~~been~~are ~~to create~~considered ~~demand~~appropriate byengineering ~~creating~~controls ~~biofuel~~and ~~awareness~~the onbest astrategy ~~national~~for ~~level~~worker protection.

WeTo ~~plan to~~reflect ~~offer~~the ~~biodiesel~~changes ~~home~~to ~~processing~~bloodborne ~~kits~~pathogens ~~from~~standards, ~~several manufacturers. It~~“engineering controls” is ~~our~~now ~~intention~~redefined ~~that~~as ~~over~~controls ~~time~~(e.g., wesharps ~~will~~disposal ~~find~~containers, ~~the right~~self-sheathing ~~balance~~needles, ~~between~~safer ~~price~~medical ~~and~~devices, ~~quality. We~~such ~~intend~~as tosharps ~~work~~ with ~~those companies~~engineered sharps injury protection and needleless systems) that ~~will~~isolate ~~eventually~~or ~~grant~~remove usthe ~~exclusivity~~bloodborne ~~for~~pathogens ~~our territory~~hazard from the workplace.

~~Decreasing~~The ~~prices~~Product: ~~of Oil~~SquareOne Safety Syringe

The ~~price of~~SquareOne ~~oil~~Safety ~~greatly~~Syringe ~~affects~~is ~~our~~a ~~business. When~~new wesafety ~~started~~hypodermic ~~our~~syringe ~~business, the price of oil was approximately $70 per barrel. The price of oil exceeded $140 at its high~~ and ~~this~~is ~~led~~intended tofor ~~increased~~general ~~interest from potential customers~~use. ~~Subsequently,~~ ~~however~~Currently, ~~the~~Federal ~~price~~law ~~for~~and aOSHA ~~barrel~~mandates ofrequire ~~crude~~that ~~oil~~healthcare ~~has fallen~~providers ~~considerably~~select tosafer ~~around~~needle ~~$40. The~~devices, ~~ingredients~~particularly tothose ~~make~~whose 1safety ~~liter~~features ~~of biodiesel~~are ~~currently~~activated ~~cost~~automatically ~~around~~upon 4use.40 ~~New~~Because ~~Israeli~~the ~~Shekels,~~SquareOne ~~which~~Safety ~~equates~~Syringe ~~to approximately~~is ~~$1.20~~the ~~per~~only ~~liter. The~~safety ~~current~~syringe ~~price~~that ~~of a liter of diesel in Israel~~ is ~~around~~automatic, ~~5.50 shekels per liter or $1.60 per liter. Hence~~self-sheathing, ~~taking~~ ~~into~~we ~~consideration~~believe that ~~a customer must purchase~~ the ~~biodiesel~~SquareOne ~~kits~~Safety ~~and then~~Syringe ~~must~~will ~~pay~~have anthe ~~additional~~opportunity 4to ~~shekels~~replace ~~for~~ the ~~ingredients,~~existing ~~our~~hypodermic ~~business~~syringes ~~model~~in ~~is not~~use ~~cost~~today ~~effective~~to ~~based~~significantly onreduce ~~current~~and ~~market~~possibly ~~prices~~eliminate ~~for~~accidental ~~regular~~needlestick ~~diesel fuel~~exposure.

The Criteria for Development and Acceptance set forth below was developed by SquareOne in order to fully examine and describe all aspects of OSHA mandates for safety syringes, as well as the features of competitive devices and standard hypodermic syringes, and to guide the design and manufacture of any safety syringe. The SquareOne Safety Syringe was developed in compliance with these criteria, and is the only device meeting all the following criteria, particularly, “automatic” and “self-sheathing.”

Criteria for Development and Acceptance

●	The Safety Syringe device must be a functional hypodermic syringe with full FDA approval.
●	The Safety Syringe device must be available in all common sizes, be able to accommodate any standard needle up to 1.5 inches in length and must be compatible with standard packaging and sterilization technologies.
●	The Safety Syringe device must be an integral part of the syringe, not an accessory, and must be useable in a manner similar to standard syringes in all applications/procedures.
●	The safety features should be as simple as possible and the safety device should require little or no training to use effectively.
●	The safety features must activate automatically if the user does not have or loses intentional control of the device, i.e., the device must be self-sheathing to be in compliance with the OSHA mandate.
●	The Safety Syringe device must allow the worker's hands to remain behind the needle during use, especially during deployment of the safety feature, so as to preclude the need for movement of the hands or fingers in the direction of the used needle; the safety feature must provide a fixed barrier between the hands and needle when not in use.

Table of Contents

●	The safety device must be user-friendly in all applications/procedures, i.e., the device must be easy to manipulate while being safe and effective.
●	Healthcare practitioners must be able to safely change needles before injection, if necessary, to prevent vial contamination, or to allow a different gauge/length needle to be attached to the syringe
●	The Safety Syringe must have a permanent locking feature that disables the device and prevents reuse.
●	The Safety Syringe must not be lockable with the needle exposed. The safety features must be in effect after disposal and should minimize additional disposal bulk.
●	Manufacture of the Safety Syringe must be cost-effective, thus enabling the device to be competitively marketed.

The SquareOne Safety Syringe will be produced by a third-party manufacturer according to all regulatory requirements, especially FDA Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), for the manufacture of Class II medical devices in the U.S., as well as International Standardization Organization (ISO) 9000 in the U.S. The product design allows use of existing injection molding technology and fabrication techniques that utilize materials that are FDA-approved. Its components will be made of transparent polycarbonate and polypropylene. Graduation marks are provided on the plunger for ease in reading medication levels.

Critical product characteristics for consideration are as follows:

●	Performance: The device must perform as well or better than other existing safety syringes and must prevent accidental needlesticks as much as possible. No training or special handling is necessary once the user has been briefed on its proper use.

●	Reliability: Exhaustive testing, as well as safety approvals from the FDA and OSHA, will be a part of the full development of this product. Additionally, we will undertake a full Underwriters Laboratories (UL) program, conducted to set the standard or benchmark for the syringe industry.

●

Price: This syringe can be manufactured in quantity using existing methods and will cost only slightly more than current standard syringes without safety features. The additional cost is due mainly to additional plastic material for fabrication and additional automatic assembly steps used during production.

●	Ability to Manufacture: The SquareOne Safety Syringe is designed to be manufactured and assembled easily and cost-effectively. The design is especially suited for automatic assembly.

The Market

The need for safety procedures and safety equipment in the medical field is long-standing and well-documented. There is a need for protective measures to be taken to ensure that healthcare workers, as well as the general population, are not at risk from accidental exposure to bloodborne diseases, including, but not limited to HIV, HBV, tuberculosis (TB) and Staphylococcus infections, all of which can be fatal. As a result of this market need, new and important products are being developed to reduce the likelihood of accidental exposure to these blooborne diseases.

Accidental needlesticks most often occur when contaminated hypodermic syringes are being recapped or are not being disposed of properly. Recapping a used/contaminated needle is now against OSHA regulations and may result in a $10,000.00 fine per incident. Despite procedural efforts to limit the problem, each year millions of accidental needlestick injuries are reported and these cost hospitals and insurance companies over $3 billion annually in diagnosis and follow-up care, excluding the annual cost of treating infected workers, costs resulting from loss of life, loss of income, civil suit awards, litigation expenses and higher insurance premiums (see Kalorama Information “Needle-Free Drug Injection and Safety Syringes”). Of the reported needlestick injuries, ninety-three percent (93%) involve needles containing blood or other potentially contaminated body fluids. The increasing hazards of exposure to bloodborne diseases caused by needlestick injuries alone are the most compelling reasons for development of an effective safety syringe.

Table of Contents

The global market for syringes is approximately 30 billion units per year, with approximately 27% of this volume in the U.S. alone. Currently, it is estimated that over 800 million “safety syringes” are sold in the U.S. [Source: Global Industry Analysts, Inc. “Syringes (Disposable and Resuable): A Global Strategic Business Report”] In summary, there are two powerful factors driving the market demand for safety syringes in the U.S. that will simultaneously “push” and “pull” safety syringes into the market:

●	The Pull: the collective voices of healthcare workers and their associations and unions.
●	The Push: strong legislation at both the state and federal levels requiring the use of safer technology as it becomes available, particularly those that are automatic and self-sheathing.

Sales and Marketing

We plan to penetrate the U.S. market in three (3) phases -- Market Introduction, Market Penetration and Market Expansion. The targeted annual sales volumes for each of these phases are 25 million, 100 million and 300 million units, respectively.

1. Phase 1. Market Introduction

Market Introduction efforts will focus on selected markets in California, since the California market alone represents a substantial portion of the U.S. market. The primary focus will be on (a) large hospitals and hospital systems, (b) large medical purchasing organizations that control the distribution of medical devices to hospital groups, (c) clinical co-ops and (d) institutional or government purchasing organizations. We have identified and qualified many of the organizations that would participate in the Phase 1 commercial launch in the California market.

During Phase 1, approximately 150,000 to 250,000 3cc SquareOne Safety Syringes will be distributed. These units will be commercial-grade units with all regulatory requirements satisfied for clinical use. The initial contacts with hospitals and hospital buying groups will be made by our in-house sales personnel with experience in medical device sales. For each contact, clear and concise promotional and instructional materials will be presented to the Infection Control Committee to initiate the new product acceptance protocol. These presentations will not only emphasize compliance criteria with respect to the federal and state laws, but will also emphasize the differential advantages of our device over the other devices, as well as the immediate cost savings resulting from its use (see also Advertising Campaign section below describing the “SquareOne Marketing Edge”).

Following acceptance by the Infection Control or Sharps Committee at each hospital or buying group, extensive in-service training programs will be initiated. The key to a successful commercial launch of the product in any market lies in the quality of the in-service training program and the in-service personnel, who will train the users shift-by-shift, as necessary. These marketing professionals will also train additional staff to provide the ongoing in-service training needed at each site. Depending on the size of the hospital, such in-service training can require weeks or more to complete. The core instructors are already in place to accomplish this task once tooling fabrication and manufacturing are underway.

The target goal for the first year of sales resulting from the Phase 1 Market Introduction efforts is 25 million units. However, this early Phase 1 effort is not only to generate substantial orders, but also to position us for an aggressive Phase 2 National Market Penetration as set forth below. Thus, during Phase 1, we will become fully established with our:

●	key sales and marketing staff
●	comprehensive sales and marketing plan

●	sales and marketing materials, including instructional materials

~~Our~~Table ~~Business~~of ~~and Marketing Strategy~~Contents

We● ~~intend to~~public ~~target~~relations ~~consumers who live in communities that have sufficient available land~~ and ~~facilities~~advertising tocampaign ~~house~~● ~~biodiesel~~sales ~~processors. Moshav~~compensation and kibbutz communities, which are farming communities, will be our prime targets. A moshav community is a community built around a private farm where the produce produced from the farm is sold to communities across the country. The profits earned by each individual are kept by the individual. A kibbutz community is a communal farm community where profits, expenses, and decisions relating to farm operations are shared among the people living in the kibbutz.plan

~~Competitive~~● ~~Business Conditions~~in-service ~~and~~training ~~our~~program ~~Competitive~~● ~~Position~~distribution inplan, ~~the~~including ~~Industry~~distributors and ~~Methods~~other channels of ~~Competition~~ distribution

We plan to implement a customer-focused approach to sales. Unlike internet based businesses, our customers will have the ability to "look and feel" the product prior to executing a purchasing transaction. Our presence in Israel will enable customers to create a personal relationship with our sales staff. Customers will also receive the personal service of customer account maintenance provided by us, unlike internet based companies which rarely offer more than an email address for contact purposes. We intend to include within our customer support services the processing of defective kits. Internet companies usually require the customer to ship the defective unit back to the manufacturer or internet company on the customer’s own account and wait for the processing of the claim and the shipping of a new unit. We plan to swap defective kits for new kits on the spot, with no customer down time.

●	pricing strategy
●	communication plan, including a web-based contact information and an 800 phone number

~~Employees~~2. Phase 2 and Phase 3. Market Penetration and Expansion

AsEarly in the Phase 1 Market Introduction Phase, we will also begin our Phase 2 Market Penetration program to aggressively expand our distribution and in-service training programs nationally to achieve annual production and sales volumes of ~~December~~ 31100 million units, ~~2008~~comprising both 1cc and 3cc sizes. After achieving this goal, in Year 2, we ~~have~~will nobegin ~~employees~~expansion of operations to achieve annual production and sales volumes of 300 million units (Phase 3) early in the third year. ~~All~~Expansion ~~functions~~of distribution will be bolstered by a vigorous advertising campaign, ~~including development~~as well as by education of the medical professionals and those having the interest and power to enforce the new laws covering use of hypodermic syringes and their improvements, ~~strategy~~particularly, ~~negotiations~~our device and ~~administration~~its differential benefits. Thus, ~~are~~a ~~currently~~vigorous ~~being provided~~campaign byaimed ~~our~~at ~~Directors~~the onrelevant governmental and professional organizations will also be pursued as ~~needed~~set ~~basis~~forth below.

~~Risks Relating~~We have also approached several potential industry-leading distribution organizations that have shown considerable interest and have tentatively agreed to ~~Our~~distribute ~~Business~~the Safety Syringe nationally. International marketing will soon follow, once market acceptance in the California market and other significant markets in the U.S. is realized. International sales will generally follow the lead of the U.S.

We3. Advertising ~~have~~Campaign: The aSquareOne ~~going~~Marketing ~~concern opinion from our auditors, indicating the possibility that we may not be able to continue to operate.~~Edge

~~The Company~~We ~~has~~will ~~incurred~~launch aan ~~net~~aggressive ~~loss~~advertising ~~of $53~~campaign,~~738~~ ~~for~~as ~~the~~well ~~period~~as ~~from~~begin ~~June~~to ~~28,~~publish ~~2007 (date~~articles ofin ~~inception)~~specific ~~through~~medical ~~December~~journals ~~31,~~and ~~2008.~~other Werelated ~~anticipate~~medical ~~generating losses for the next 12 months. Therefore~~journals, ~~we may be unable~~ to ~~continue~~achieve ~~operations~~widespread ~~in the~~publicity ~~future~~and asexposure ato ~~going~~healthcare ~~concern~~professionals. NoThere ~~adjustment~~are ~~has~~several ~~been~~basic ~~made~~principles inthat ~~the accompanying~~will ~~financial~~drive ~~statements to~~ the ~~amounts~~sales and ~~classification~~marketing efforts of ~~assets and~~the ~~liabilities~~SquareOne ~~which~~Safety ~~could~~Syringe, ~~result~~namely, ~~should we be unable to continue as~~ (a) ~~going concern. If~~differential ~~we cannot continue as a viable entity~~advantage, ~~our~~(b) ~~stockholders may~~compliance ~~lose~~with ~~some~~federal orand ~~all~~state oflaws ~~their~~and ~~investment~~(c) inimmediate ~~the~~healthcare ~~Company~~cost savings.

~~In addition,~~Differential ~~our~~Advantage. Our customers ~~independent~~will ~~auditors~~receive ~~included~~a annumber ~~explanatory~~of ~~paragraph~~important inbenefits ~~their report on~~ the ~~accompanying~~competition ~~financial~~is ~~statements~~unable ~~included herein regarding concerns about our ability~~ to ~~continue as a going concern~~provide. While Asthe acompetition ~~result, we~~ may ~~not~~ beprovide ~~able~~some ~~to obtain necessary funding. There can be no assurance that we will ever achieve any revenues or profitability. The revenue and income potential~~ of ~~our~~these ~~proposed business and operations is unproven~~benefits, ~~and~~ the ~~lack~~SquareOne ofSafety ~~operating~~Syringe ~~history~~meets ~~makes~~all ~~it difficult to evaluate~~ the ~~future prospects of our business.~~following:

●	The device is automatic, shelf-sheathing
●	The needle can be safely changed or replaced

●	The syringe maintains a barrier between hands and the needle when not in use
●	The syringe cannot be locked with the needle exposed

●	The device has shown strong acceptance in clinical trials
●	The syringe is locked and safe if intentional control of the device is lost

●	The syringe is cost-effective

Compliance with Federal and State Laws. Because federal law now requires that all healthcare employers select safer needle devices, including devices that are automatic, self-sheathing devices, hospitals may now operate in full compliance with all OSHA and legislative mandates by using the SquareOne Safety Syringe.

Immediate Healthcare Cost Savings. The improved healthcare resulting from use of the SquareOne Safety Syringe pays immediate and direct cost dividends to the user institution because of reduced worker compensation, direct relief of injury-related claims and reduced healthcare follow-up costs expended for each reported needlestick injury, estimated, on average, to be $3,000 per injury.

WeTable ~~are~~of ~~a development stage company and may never be able to execute our business plan.~~Contents

WeThese ~~were incorporated~~benefits onwill ~~June 28, 2007. We currently have no customers or revenues. We may not~~ be ~~able~~emphasized toin ~~execute~~all ~~our~~market ~~business~~introductions, ~~plan~~including ~~unless~~trade ~~and until~~shows, wecustomer ~~are~~presentations ~~successful~~ (in-service ~~raising additional funds. We anticipate that we will require a minimum of approximately $50~~training),~~000~~ topublications ~~remain operational during the next twelve months. Due to our present financial situation~~and, ~~however~~especially, ~~such~~ ~~financing~~in ~~may~~our ~~not~~advertising ~~be forthcoming~~campaign. ~~Even~~These ifare ~~financing~~the ~~is available,~~competitive itadvantages ~~may~~that ~~not~~will beentice ~~available~~customers ~~on terms we find favorable. As a result, we may not be able~~ to ~~obtain~~purchase the ~~necessary~~SquareOne ~~funding. Failure to~~Safety ~~secure~~Syringe, ~~the~~as ~~needed~~these ~~financing~~benefits ~~will~~provide ~~have~~overall aimproved ~~very~~safety ~~serious effect on our Company's ability~~ to ~~survive~~healthcare professionals. AtThe ~~this~~psychological ~~time,~~benefit ~~there~~for ~~are~~worker nosafety ~~anticipated~~is ~~additional sources~~also ofenhanced ~~funds~~beyond ~~in place~~measure.

~~Our business~~4. Other ~~model~~Marketing ~~may be unsuccessful.~~Methods

~~Our business~~In ~~model~~addition isto ~~new~~an ~~and~~aggressive ~~unproven~~advertising and ~~may~~promotion ~~never~~campaign beaimed ~~successful. The success~~at ~~of our business model depends on our ability to generate revenue from~~ the ~~sale~~large ofinstitutional ~~biodiesel~~purchasing ~~home processing kits to our customers~~organizations, ~~and~~we towill ~~realize~~expend ~~new revenue~~considerable ~~streams~~efforts ~~through the development of complementary products and services. Our ability to develop~~ (a) ~~market~~communicating ~~for biodiesel home processing kits and to successfully market and sell such kits is unproven, and~~ the ~~lack~~availability of anits ~~operating~~fully ~~history~~compliant ~~makes~~Safety itSyringe difficult to validate our business model, especially in light of the recent decline in the price of oil. If, for example, we are unable to obtain the distribution rights to the biodiesel home processing kits, or if our advertising campaign proves ineffective, the Company and ~~our~~(b) ~~operations~~demonstrating ~~will be at substantial risk. In addition, we may be forced to alter our business model in~~ the ~~future~~device to ~~adapt~~relevant togovernmental ~~changes in our industry~~ and ~~our~~professional ~~markets~~organizations.

~~Our executive~~Additionally, ~~officers~~since ~~and~~the ~~Directors~~Underwriters ~~have~~Laboratory ~~significant~~(UL) ~~voting~~mission ~~power~~is to provide independent evaluation and ~~may~~certification ~~take actions~~to ~~that~~devices ~~may~~and beequipment ~~different~~to ~~than~~insure ~~actions~~high-level ~~sought~~user bysafety, ~~our~~we ~~other stockholders~~will vigorously pursue such certification activities with UL, first to create a new category of safety standards for hypodermic syringes and then to solidify the safety syringe standard for the industry.

~~Our officers~~A ~~and~~second ~~Directors~~independent ~~own~~evaluation ~~approximately~~organization ~~56%~~is of the ~~outstanding~~ECRI, ~~shares~~formerly, ofthe ~~our common~~Emergency ~~stock. These~~Care ~~stockholders~~Research ~~are~~Institute, ~~able~~a tononprofit ~~exercise~~health ~~significant influence~~services ~~over~~research ~~all~~agency ~~matters~~established ~~requiring~~in ~~stockholder~~1955, ~~approval. This influence~~whose ~~over~~function ~~our~~is ~~affairs~~also ~~might~~to beprovide ~~adverse~~independent toevaluation of the ~~interest~~safety of ~~our other stockholders. In addition~~devices, ~~this~~will ~~concentration~~also ofbe ~~ownership~~vigorously ~~could delay or prevent a change in control and might have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock~~pursued.

~~Since~~Finally, ~~our~~selected ~~officers~~insurance ~~and~~companies ~~Directors~~that ~~may work~~bear orthe ~~consult~~largest ~~for~~portion ~~other~~of the healthcare costs relating to needlestick injuries will be heavily lobbied. Since such insurance companies cover billions of dollars in healthcare costs annually that result from needlestick injuries, their ~~other~~own ~~activities~~benefit ~~could~~from ~~slow~~the ~~down~~use of our ~~operations~~ device has the potential to be of similar magnitude.

~~Our officers~~The and Directors are not required to work exclusively for us and do not devote all of their time to our operations. Presently, our officers and Directors allocate only a portion of their time to the planning and operation of our business. Since our officers and Directors are currently employed full time elsewhere, they are able to commit to us between 4 to 8 hours per week. Therefore, it is possible that their pursuit of other activities may slow our operations and reduce our financial results because of the slow down in operations.Competition

~~We need to retain key personnel to support our products and ongoing operations~~1. Existing Safety Syringes

~~The marketing~~To ~~and~~identify ~~sale~~existing ofsafety ~~our~~syringe products, ~~and~~our ~~services~~personnel ~~will~~performed ~~continue~~an toextensive ~~place~~patent search and contacted over a ~~significant~~ ~~strain~~hundred onhealthcare ~~our~~professionals ~~limited~~familiar ~~personnel~~with the devices that were currently available to hospitals, ~~management~~private practice physicians, and ~~other resources~~private practice dentists. ~~Our~~These ~~future~~included ~~success~~many ~~depends~~doctors, ~~upon~~nurse ~~the~~practitioners ~~continued~~and ~~services~~dentists. While ~~of our~~there ~~executive~~were ~~officers~~many ~~and~~patented ~~other~~syringe ~~key~~designs ~~employees~~attempting ~~and~~to ~~contractors~~create ~~who~~safer ~~have~~syringes, ~~critical technological~~few ~~knowledge,~~had ~~industry~~made ~~experience,~~it to the market and, ~~relationships~~of ~~upon~~these, ~~which~~only ~~we rely~~a tofew ~~implement~~have ~~our~~significant ~~business~~volume ~~plan~~today. ~~The~~Generally, ~~loss~~the ofdevices ~~the~~covered ~~services~~by ofthese ~~any of~~patents ~~our~~are ~~officers~~complicated orand the ~~lack~~products ofwould ~~availability~~be ofvery ~~other~~costly ~~skilled~~to ~~personnel~~fabricate. ~~would negatively~~Moreover, ~~impact~~most ~~our~~were ~~ability~~not user-friendly and, in fact, were deemed to ~~develop~~be unsafe by their own design characteristics. Furthermore, ~~market~~no safety syringes similar to, ~~and~~or ~~sell~~that ~~our~~perform ~~products~~the ~~and services~~same function as, ~~which~~the ~~could~~SquareOne ~~adversely~~design ~~affect~~were ~~our~~found ~~financial~~on ~~results~~or ~~and~~off ~~impair~~the ~~our growth~~market (see Criteria for Acceptance above).

According to several reliable sources in the field, there are only a few safety syringes that are even superficially comparable to the SquareOne Safety Syringe, namely, the B-D Integra®, the Retractable Technologies VanishPoint® and the NMT safety syringe. Many other “safety syringe devices” were evaluated by SquareOne personnel and by the ECRI. These include: the B-D SafetyLok®, the B-D SafetyGlide®, the Covidien (Tyco) Monoject®, and the Covidien (Tyco) Magellen®, Turtle TS-1®, SafeSnap®, Maxxon®, Medi-Hut®, Bioject®, Medisys®, Futura®, Safety 1st® and Retrax®. Even though some of these devices received an “acceptable” rating by the ECRI, they are not automatic, self-sheathing. The automatic, self-sheathing feature of the SquareOne device, among other things, distinguishes it from all others in the field. Although technically, the Safe-Shot™ syringe by Medical Safety Technologies, Inc., is automatic, self-sheathing, its shortcomings limit its use in most applications in the clinical setting.

Importantly, none of the above devices complies fully with the new regulations for Class II needle-bearing medical devices described under 21 U.S.C. § 360d, in addition to 29 CFR 1910.1030 OSHA. Our device, however, does fully comply, as it is based on our “Criteria for Acceptance,” the development guidelines that were adopted by the SEIU and used to petition the FDA to promulgate new performance standards with which any safety syringe should comply, particularly the automatic, self-sheathing criteria.

~~Our~~Table ~~officers and Directors are located outside~~ of ~~the United States.~~ Contents

~~Since~~In ~~our officers~~summary, because the OSHA mandate and ~~Directors~~federal and state laws now include “self-sheathing needles,” and because there are ~~located~~no insuch ~~Israel~~devices on the market today that meet that mandate, ~~any~~when ~~attempts~~marketed, tothe ~~enforce liabilities~~SquareOne ~~upon~~Safety Syringe will be the only such ~~individuals~~device ~~under~~on the Umarket that is fully compliant.S. We ~~securities~~therefore ~~and~~have ~~bankruptcy~~an ~~laws may~~opportunity beto ~~difficult~~capture significant market share from the leading manufacturers in the industry.

Our executive officers have no experience in operating or marketing biodiesel processing kits. This could cause them to make inexperienced or uninformed decisions that may result in negative consequences for us and our business. As a result, our operations could suffer irreparable harm and may cause us to suspend or cease operations, which could cause investors to lose their entire investment.Manufacturing

~~Since~~The ~~our officers~~Safety ~~and~~Syringe ~~Directors have~~will noinitially ~~experience~~be inmanufactured ~~operating~~by ora ~~marketing biodiesel~~highly-qualified, ~~processing~~third-party ~~kits~~manufacturer ~~they~~in ~~could~~compliance ~~make~~with the ~~wrong~~FDA ~~decisions~~Good ~~regarding~~Manufacturing ~~the operation~~Practices ~~and~~for ~~marketing~~Class ofII ~~our~~medical ~~business~~devices in the U.S., ~~which~~as ~~could~~well ~~lead~~as conform to ~~irreparable~~ISO ~~damage to~~9000 ~~our~~or ~~business~~better. ~~Consequently,~~The ~~our~~product ~~operations~~design ~~could~~allows ~~suffer irreparable~~use ~~harm~~of ~~from~~existing ~~mistakes~~injection-molding ~~made~~technology byand ~~our~~fabrication ~~executive~~techniques ~~officers~~that utilize FDA-approved materials readily available in the industry and wethat ~~may~~are currently used for the manufacture of similar products, i.e. hypodermic syringes. The components will be made of transparent polycarbonate and polypropylene. In short, we have ~~to suspend~~prepared ora ~~cease~~detailed ~~operations~~manufacturing plan, ~~which~~complete ~~could~~with ~~cause~~Bill ~~investors~~of Materials, to ~~lose~~be ~~their~~implemented ~~entire investment~~and automated by the selected manufacturer.

~~Risks Relating~~We have entered into detailed discussions with several highly-qualified, third-party manufacturers to ~~Our~~fabricate ~~Strategy~~and supply all tooling, to the Company’s specifications, to manufacture its Safety Syringe for Phase 1 Market Introduction, as well as full commercial tooling and ~~Industry~~automated assembly equipment for Phase 2 Market Penetration. The selected manufacturer would also produce the Safety Syringe for the Phase 1 and Phase 2 and would provide full manufacturing support for the rollout of more permanent, Company-owned manufacturing facilities for its Phase 3 Market Expansion. After such Company-owned manufacturing facilities initiated full commercial production of the Safety Syringe, the selected manufacturer would continue to fabricate all tooling for further expansion and would serve as the official second-site manufacturer of the product, as well as the training facility for new manufacturing personnel, as needed.

~~The long-term demand for biodiesel fuel may decline.~~Production

~~The long-term~~Our ~~demand~~mission ~~for~~is ~~biodiesel~~to ~~fuel~~produce isand ~~uncertain. We~~sell ~~cannot~~a ~~forecast without~~minimum ~~any~~of ~~certainty~~300 million SquareOne Safety Syringes annually into the ~~future~~U.S. ~~long-term~~Market ~~demand~~in ~~for~~Year ~~biodiesel,~~3. To ~~and~~establish asthis ~~such~~level ~~it is~~of ~~difficult~~production ~~for~~will usrequire toapproximately ~~forecast~~twenty-four ~~sales~~(24) ~~and~~months ~~allocate~~from ~~our~~the ~~resources~~date inof afull ~~manner that~~funding ~~would~~and will be ~~consistent~~accomplished ~~with~~in ~~our~~three ~~actual~~(3) ~~sales~~overlapping phases. ~~Moreover,~~The ~~our~~goal ~~expense levels~~of ~~are~~Phase ~~based~~1 in(Months ~~part~~1-12) onis ~~our~~to ~~expectations~~establish ofannual ~~future~~production ~~sales~~capacity at 100 million units and, ifto ~~our expectations~~produce ~~regarding~~and ~~future~~sell ~~sales~~25 ~~are~~million ~~inaccurate,~~units; wethe ~~may~~goal beof ~~unable~~Phase 2 (Months 13-24) is to ~~reduce costs~~produce inand asell ~~timely~~100 ~~manner~~million tounits ~~adjust~~and ~~for~~to ~~sales~~establish ~~shortfalls. As~~annual aproduction ~~result, if~~capacity ~~demand~~at ~~decreases~~300 million, weand ~~may~~the ~~experience~~goal aof ~~rapid~~Phase ~~decline~~3 inis ~~our~~to ~~sales~~produce and ~~profitability~~ sell 300 million units annually until further expansion is warranted.

The market price of biodiesel is dependent on many factors, including the price of petroleum, the price of gasoline, and the price of raw materials. Any increase in the price of raw materials used to produce biodiesel fuel will adversely affect our business.Patents

~~Petroleum prices~~Existing are highly volatile and difficult to forecast due to frequent changes in global politics and the world economy. The distribution of petroleum throughout the world is affected by incidents in unstable political environments, such as Iraq, Iran, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, the former U.S.S.R. and other countries and regions. The industrialized world depends critically on oil from these areas, and any disruption or other reduction in oil supply can cause significant fluctuations in the prices of oil and gasoline. We cannot predict the future price of oil or gasoline, and in the future it may not be economical to rely on the production and use of biodiesel as an alternative fuel source. In recent years, the prices of gasoline and petroleum have all reached historically unprecedented high levels, even though the prices have since declined significantly. If the prices of gasoline and petroleum remain at their current levels or were to decline further, we believe that the demand for biodiesel as an alternative fuel would be adversely affected. Fluctuations in the market price of biodiesel may cause our profitability to fluctuate significantly.Patents

We have been granted three (3) U.S. Patents for the SquareOne Safety Syringe. These are utility patents, each carrying a twenty-year lifespan from the date of filing:

●	Patent # 5,057,086, Safety Syringe, issued October 1991 with twelve claims granted covering the form, fit and function of the basic device.
●	Patent # 5,279,584, Rotary Lock for Needle Sheaths, issued January 1994 with eighteen claims granted covering the permanent lock mechanism that disables the device after use.
●	Patent #5,308,332, Actuator Spring for Syringe Sheaths, issued May 1994 with three claims granted covering the utility of the plastic spring that always has adequate biasing tension to move the cover to the lock position from any release position.

~~Our results~~Table of operations and financial condition will be significantly affected by the cost and supply of the raw materials used in the production of biodiesel, namely, vegetable oil, methanol, and lye. Changes in the price and supply of these raw materials are subject to and determined by market forces over which we have no control. For example, the prices for and availability of methanol are subject to volatile market conditions. These market conditions often are affected by factors beyond our control such as higher prices resulting from colder than average weather conditions, overall economic conditions, and foreign and domestic governmental regulations. Significant disruptions in the supply of methanol could impair the ability to manufacture biodiesel. Furthermore, increases in methanol prices or changes in methanol costs relative to gasoline costs may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.Contents

~~In addition,~~Pending the increased production of biodiesel could have adverse effects on our business. Increased biodiesel production could result in increased demand for raw materials required to make biodiesel fuel. This could result in higher prices for these products, which would lead to higher biodiesel production costs, which could lead to a decrease in demand for our products. We cannot predict the future price of biodiesel or of its raw materials. Any increase in the price of biodiesel will adversely affect our sales and profitability.Patents

~~Our business~~We ishave ~~subject~~recently filed an additional patent (August 2008) that builds on its three previous patents and includes twenty new claims, including (i) red colored locking fingers that give the user the ability to ~~extensive~~visually ~~regulation~~determine bythat ~~federal~~the device is bearing an exposed needle at any point during its use, ~~state~~thereby adding an additional safety utility and ~~local governmental~~(ii) ~~agencies~~the utility of the helix design for the plastic spring that allows full collapse of the spring, thereby enabling the Slider (cover slide) full pull-back to expose the needle to the hub. This latter feature gives the user the ability to use any size needle up to 1.5 inches.

WeImportantly, ~~cannot predict~~the infiling ~~what~~of ~~manner~~the ornew topatent ~~what~~with ~~extent~~the ~~governmental~~additional ~~regulations~~claims ~~will~~for ~~harm our business or~~ the ~~biodiesel~~Safety ~~marketing~~Syringe ~~industry~~itself innot ~~general. If~~only ~~changes in~~gives ~~government regulations reduce the demand for biodiesel,~~ our ~~sales~~device ~~and profitability~~an ~~may~~additional ~~decline. Compliance~~twenty ~~with~~years ~~regulations~~of ~~may~~intellectual ~~be time-consuming~~property ~~and expensive~~protection, ~~and~~when ~~may~~issued, ~~delay~~but oralso ~~even~~allows ~~prevent~~new ~~sales~~foreign ofpatents ~~our products~~to inbe ~~Israel~~filed orto inprovide ~~other~~worldwide ~~jurisdictions~~protection.

~~For example~~Beyond syringes, ~~the~~there ~~production and sale of biodiesel~~ is ~~subject~~a tovast ~~regulation~~array ~~by agencies~~ of ~~the~~venipuncture ~~Federal~~products ~~government,~~falling ~~including,~~under ~~but not limited to,~~ the ~~Environmental~~ ~~Protection~~same ~~Agency~~needlestick inprotection ~~the U~~mandate.S. Therefore, aswe ~~well~~are asready ~~other~~to ~~agencies~~file inseveral ~~each jurisdiction~~new ~~in which biodiesel is produced~~patents, ~~sold,~~both ~~stored,~~domestically ~~or transported. The environmental laws~~ and ~~regulations~~internationally, that ~~affect~~describe ~~our business~~further ~~are~~improvements ~~extensive~~to ~~and~~the ~~have~~SquareOne ~~become~~Safety ~~progressively~~Syringe ~~more stringent. Applicable~~itself, ~~laws~~as ~~and~~well ~~regulations~~as ~~are~~new ~~subject~~designs ~~to change. Violations~~for ofother ~~environmental~~safety ~~laws~~needle ~~and~~products, ~~regulations~~namely, ora ~~permit conditions~~manually ~~can~~operated ~~result~~(non-automatic) inSafety ~~substantial penalties~~Syringe, ~~injunctive~~a ~~orders,~~Safety ~~civil~~Catheter ~~and criminal~~for ~~sanctions,~~I.V. ~~permit revocations~~use, ~~and/or~~a ~~facility~~Dental ~~shutdowns. If significant~~Safety ~~unforeseen~~Syringe ~~liabilities~~(application ~~arise~~filed) ~~for~~and ~~corrective~~a ~~action~~Phlebotomy or(blood-drawing) ~~other compliance,~~device ~~our~~to ~~sales~~be ~~and~~used ~~profitability~~with ~~could~~a bevacuum ~~materially~~tube ~~and~~(see ~~adversely affected~~below).

~~An increase~~Future ~~in taxes would adversely affect our business~~Products

~~Due~~We ~~to environment~~have ~~concerns~~been ~~and~~actively ~~for~~engaged ~~other~~in ~~reasons,~~developing ~~taxes~~new onproducts ~~diesel~~that ~~fuel, in general,~~ are ~~on the rise. Higher taxes on diesel fuel may result~~ in ~~the reduction~~advanced ofstages ~~the number~~ of diesel engine vehicles imported into Israel. A reduction in the number of diesel engine vehicles in Israel will result in a decrease in our proposed market and may directly affect the profitability of our business.development:

~~In addition,~~A ~~there~~manually ~~are~~operated ~~currently~~Safety ~~minimal~~Syringe ~~taxes~~(non-automatic), similar in design to ~~import~~the ~~biodiesel~~current ~~home~~SquareOne ~~processing kits~~Safety toSyringe, ~~Israel~~but ~~from~~without the ~~United~~plastic ~~States. Should~~spring, ~~custom~~will ~~duties~~be orintroduced ~~other taxes~~for onuse outside the ~~import~~U.S. ofwhere ~~biodiesel~~the ~~home~~self-sheathing ~~processing~~feature ~~kits~~is benot ~~increased,~~required. ~~our~~This ~~costs~~ device would ~~increase~~compete ~~and~~directly with many other devices, as the ~~profitability~~SquareOne device is of ~~our~~superior ~~business~~design ~~would~~and ~~be harmed~~function.

8The Safety Catheter Device for I.V. use is achieved by changing the LuerLok fitting on the syringe barrel to a slip-fit design to accommodate a catheter, thus yielding an automatic, self-sheathing device. Removing the plastic spring would create a manually operated (non-automatic) safety catheter, if required.

~~Our~~The ~~lack~~Safety ofPhlebotomy ~~business~~Device ~~diversification could~~(blood-drawing) ~~result~~is insimply a 10cc or 20cc size Safety Syringe modified with a phlebotomy needle. This Safety Phlebotomy device is complete with the ~~loss~~SquareOne ofautomatic ~~your~~locking ~~investment~~features ifadapted ~~revenues~~to ~~from~~the ~~our~~phlebotomy ~~primary products~~application ~~decrease~~normally used with vacuum tubes for drawing blood.

~~Currently, our~~The ~~business~~Dental isSafety ~~focused~~Syringe onthat ~~the~~includes ~~marketing~~a ~~and~~living-hinge ~~sale~~component, ofwhich, ~~biodiesel~~when ~~home~~released, ~~processing kits~~allows tothe protective ~~consumers. We do not have any other lines of business or other sources of revenue if we are unable~~ sheath to ~~successfully~~snap ~~implement~~down ~~our~~over ~~business plan. Our~~the ~~lack~~needle, ofthereby ~~business~~protecting ~~diversification could cause you to lose all or some of your investment if we are unable to generate revenues by~~ the ~~sale of~~dentist ~~biodiesel~~and ~~home processing kits since we do not have any other lines of business or alternative revenue sources~~patient.

~~A refusal~~No byassurance ~~automobile~~can ~~manufacturers~~be togiven ~~honor~~regarding ~~their~~the ~~engine~~viability ~~warranties~~of ~~in instances~~such ~~where~~products, ~~vehicle~~whether ~~owners~~or ~~use~~not ~~biodiesel~~they ~~fuel~~will ~~would~~be ~~jeopardize~~developed ~~our~~or, ~~ability to~~if ~~market~~developed, ~~our~~will ~~products~~be successful.

~~Some automobile~~ITEM ~~manufacturers have refused to honor diesel engine warranties of vehicle owners who have switched from regular diesel fuel to biodiesel~~1A. ~~While~~ itRISK is true that a diesel engine that had been run on regular diesel fuel before converting to biodiesel fuel may suffer increased breakdowns as a result, new diesel engines that from inception have been run on biodiesel fuels actually suffer less wear-and-tear damage and last longer. Nevertheless, if automobile manufacturers do not allow vehicle owners to use biodiesel fuel, then the demand for our products will be detrimentally affected and our business will likely fail.FACTORS

~~Changes and~~Not ~~advances~~applied ~~in biodiesel production technology could lead~~ to ~~the~~a ~~obsolescence of~~smaller ~~our~~reporting ~~products,~~company ~~require~~such usas ~~to incur costs to update our products, or could otherwise hinder our ability to compete in the alternative fuel industry or operate profitably~~us.

Advances and changes in the technology of biodiesel production can be expected to occur. Such advances and changes may make the biodiesel production technology upon which our products are based less desirable or obsolete. These advances could also allow our competitors to produce biodiesel at a lower cost than can be produced with our products. If we are unable to adopt or incorporate technological advances, our biodiesel products could become less efficient than our competitors, which may cause our products to become uncompetitive or completely obsolete. If our competitors develop, obtain, or license technology that is superior to ours or that makes our technology obsolete, we may be required to incur significant costs to enhance or acquire new technology so that our biodiesel production products remain competitive. Alternatively, we may be required to seek third-party licenses, which could also result in significant expenditures. We cannot guarantee or assure you that third-party licenses will be available or, once obtained, will continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. These costs could negatively impact our financial performance by increasing our operating costs and reducing our net income, all of which could reduce the value of your investment.

Competition from other alternative fuels may lessen the demand for biodiesel and negatively impact our profitability, which could reduce the value of your investment.

Alternative fuels, gasoline oxygenates, and biofuel production methods are continually under development. A number of automotive, industrial and power generation manufacturers are developing alternative clean power systems using electric power, fuel cells, or clean burning gaseous fuels. Like biodiesel, the emerging electric power and fuel cell industries offer technological options to address increasing worldwide energy costs, the long-term availability of petroleum reserves, and environmental concerns. Electric power and fuel cells have emerged as potential alternatives to certain existing power sources because of their higher efficiency, reduced noise, and lower emissions. Fuel cell industry participants are currently targeting the transportation, stationary power, and portable power markets in order to decrease fuel costs, lessen dependence on crude oil and reduce harmful emissions. If the fuel cell, electric power, and hydrogen industries continue to expand and gain broad acceptance, and hydrogen becomes readily available to consumers for motor vehicle use, we may not be able to compete effectively. This additional competition could reduce the demand for biodiesel, which would negatively impact our profitability, causing a reduction in the value of your investment.

Consumer resistance to the use of biodiesel may affect the demand for biodiesel which could affect our ability to market our products and reduce the value of your investment.

Media reports in the popular press indicate that some consumers believe that biofuel adds to air pollution and harms car and truck engines. It is also widely reported that biofuel products significantly reduce fuel economy and cause overall fuel costs to substantially increase. Researchers have published studies reporting that the production of ethanol actually uses more fossil energy, such as oil and natural gas, than the amount of ethanol that is produced. These consumer beliefs could potentially be wide-spread. If consumers choose not to invest in biodiesel as an alternative fuel source, it would affect the demand for our products and negatively affect our profitability.

Our success depends on third party manufacturers of the biodiesel home processing kits.

We intend to rely on third parties for the manufacture of the biodiesel home processing kits that we will be selling to consumers. We may not be successful in developing relationships with the product manufacturers. In addition, these third parties may not dedicate sufficient resources or give sufficient priority to satisfying our required needs. There is no history upon which to base any assumption as to the likelihood that we will prove successful in selecting qualified suppliers or in negotiating any agreements with them. We can provide investors with no assurance that our products will be produced according to the specifications that we require. If we are unsuccessful in addressing these risks, our business will most likely fail.

Our success depends on third party distribution channels.

We intend to sell our products ourselves and through a series of resellers and distributors. Our future revenue growth will depend in large part on sales of our products through these relationships. We may not be successful in developing distribution relationships. Entities that distribute our products may compete with us. In addition, these distributors may not dedicate sufficient resources or give sufficient priority to selling our products. Our failure to develop distribution channels, the loss of a distribution relationship, or a decline in the efforts of a material reseller or distributor could prevent us from generating sufficient revenues to become profitable.

We rely on the technology and services of third parties.

We intend to license third party technology, including technology that will be integrated into our products. As our products evolve, we may need to license additional or alternative technology from third parties. These third party technology licenses may not be available or may not continue to be available to us on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, and we may not be able to obtain licenses for other existing and future technologies that we desire to integrate into our products. If we cannot maintain existing third party technology licenses or enter into licenses for other existing and future technologies needed for our products, we would be required to delay the delivery of our products and services to our customers while we seek licenses with alternative third parties, or develop the necessary technology internally. A delay in providing our customers with our products and services would harm our business.

Risks Relating to Operating in Israel

We conduct our operations in Israel and therefore our results may be adversely affected by political, economic and military instability in Israel.

Our current operations and our officers and Directors are located in Israel. Accordingly, political, economic and military conditions in Israel may directly affect our business. Since the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, a number of armed conflicts have taken place between Israel and its Arab neighbors. Any hostilities involving Israel or the interruption or curtailment of trade within Israel or between Israel and its trading partners could adversely affect our operations and could make it more difficult for us to raise capital.

Since September 2000, terrorist violence in Israel has increased significantly and negotiations between Israel and Palestinian representatives have not achieved a peaceful resolution of the conflict. The establishment in 2006 of a government in the Gaza territory by representatives of the Hamas militant group has created additional unrest and uncertainty in the region.

Further, Israel is currently engaged in an armed conflict with Hamas, which involves thousands of missile strikes and has disrupted most day-to-day civilian activity in southern Israel. These missile attacks by Hamas have not targeted Tel Aviv, the location of our principal executive offices; however, any armed conflicts, terrorist activities or political instability in the region would likely negatively affect business conditions and could significantly harm our results of operations.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Our ~~Principal~~ ~~Executive~~principal ~~Offices~~executive offices are located at 110 First Avenue NE, Suite #1006, Minneapolis, MN 55413. The office space is provided to us at no cost by one of our officers and directors, John Salstrom.

Our principal executive offices are located at 26 Leon Blum, Tel Aviv, Israel, Israel 69052. Our telephone number is 011-972-545-263-7308. We believe that the condition of our lease property is satisfactory, suitable and adequate for our current needs.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

~~We know of no material, active or pending legal proceedings against our company, nor of any proceedings that a governmental authority is contemplating against us~~None.

WeITEM ~~know of~~4. (REMOVED noAND material proceedings to which any of our directors, officers, affiliates, owner of record or beneficially of more than 5% of our voting securities or security holder is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our interest.RESERVED)

~~ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS~~8

~~There were~~Table ~~no matters submitted to a vote~~ of ~~security holders through the solicitation of proxies or otherwise during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.~~Contents

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

On April 16, 2008, our Common Shares began trading on the over-the-counter market and ~~are currently~~were quoted on the OTCBB under the symbol “ETEN.OB”. ~~Prior~~From toOctober ~~that~~26, ~~date~~2009, ~~there~~ ~~was~~we nostarted ~~established~~ trading ~~market~~under ~~for~~the ~~our~~symbol ~~Common Shares~~“PTMD. ~~There has~~OB” ~~been~~and nofrom ~~active trading~~April in20, ~~our securities and~~2010, ~~there~~we ~~have been~~started notrading ~~high~~under orthe ~~low~~symbol ~~bid prices quoted~~“PTMDE.OB.”

Price Information
Financial Quarter Ended	High		Low
March 31, 2009		N.A.		N.A.
June 30, 2009		N.A.		N.A.
September 30, 2009		$0.90		$0.63
December 31, 2009		$0.23		$0.20

Holders of our Common Shares

As of ~~February~~ 2May 13, ~~2009~~2010, there were 53s/b ~~registered~~ 24 stockholders holding 545,~~000~~925,000 ~~Common Shares~~shares of our common stock issued and outstanding.

Dividends

Since our inception, we have not declared nor paid any cash dividends on our capital stock and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Our current policy is to retain any earnings in order to finance our operations. Our board of Directors will determine future declarations and payments of dividends, if any, in light of the then-current conditions it deems relevant and in accordance with applicable corporate law. There are no restrictions in our articles of incorporation or bylaws that prevent us from declaring dividends.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

As of the date hereof, our 1999 Equity Incentive Plan has expired and we have not adopted ana new equity ~~compensation~~incentive plan. On November 1, 2005, subject to the terms and ~~have~~condition ~~not~~ of the 1999 Stock Option and Stock Award Plan of SquareOne, SquareOne entered into a stock option agreement with John D. Olinger. Pursuant to which, SquareOne granted ~~any~~to Mr. Olinger stock options to purchase 2,027,614 shares of the common stock of SquareOne at an exercise price of $0.3255 per share. As of the date hereof, all stock options have been fully vested, but no stock option has been exercised.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

~~During the~~Shares ~~fiscal~~Issued ~~year ended December 31, 2008, except as included~~ in ~~our~~Merger ~~Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q or in our Current Reports on Form 8-K, we have not sold any equity securities not registered under the Securities Act.~~Transaction

~~Purchases~~ Pursuant to the Share Exchange Agreement on June 25, 2009, we issued 35,000,000 shares of ~~Equity~~our ~~Securities~~common bystock to the ~~Issuer~~SquareOne ~~and~~Shareholders, ~~Affiliated~~their ~~Purchases~~affiliates or assigns, in exchange for 100% of the outstanding shares of SquareOne. Such securities were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933.

During each month within the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008, neither we nor any “affiliated purchaser”, as that term is defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act, repurchased any of our Common Shares or other securities.9

Table of Contents

The issuance of the shares was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933. We made this determination based on the representations of the SquareOne Shareholders which included, in pertinent part, that such shareholders were either (a) "accredited investors" within the meaning of Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated under the Securities Act, or (b) not a "U.S. person" as that term is defined in Rule 902(k) of Regulation S under the Act, and that such shareholders were acquiring our common stock, for investment purposes for their own respective accounts and not as nominees or agents, and not with a view to the resale or distribution thereof, and that the SquareOne Shareholders understood that the shares of our common stock may not be sold or otherwise disposed of without registration under the Securities Act or an applicable exemption therefrom.

Shares Issued for Services

With the written consent of our board of directors dated September 22, 2009, we were authorized to issue a total of 100,000 shares to Mr. Sheppard as partial compensation in connection with his directorship.

Pursuant to an agreement, dated December 18, 2009, between us and Mr. Robert C. Brehm, our consultant in connection with the introduction to Synergistic Medical Network (SMN) and the preparation and execution of a distributor selling agreement between SMN and us, we agreed to issue a total of 100,000 shares of our common stock to Mr. Brehm or his assignees (i) a total of 100,000 shares of our common stock. (ii) five-year warrants that may be exercisable for a number of shares of our common stock equal to 10% of the number of shares underlying the warrants that we may grant to SMN on a quarterly basis pursuant to the above-mentioned distributor selling agreement, and (iii) five-year warrants that may be exercisable for a number of shares of our common stock equal to 10% of the number of shares of our common stock underlying the warrants that we may grant to SMN in the event of a change in control pursuant to the above-mentioned distributor selling agreement.

Pursuant to the distributor selling agreement between us and SMN dated December 18, 2009, we agreed to issue to SMN five-year warrants exercisable for a total of 1,000,000 shares of common stock at the lower of (i) the market price of our common stock, or (ii) $0.50 per share. The warrant was issued with an exercise price of $0.35.

These securities were issued pursuant to the exemption provided under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act. These shares of our common stock qualified for exemption since the issuance shares by us did not involve a public offering. The offering was not a “public offering” as defined in Section 4(2) due to the insubstantial number of persons involved in the deal, size of the offering, manner of the offering and number of shares offered. We did not undertake an offering in which we sold a high number of shares to a high number of investors. In addition, the shareholder had the necessary investment intent as required by Section 4(2) since she agreed to and received share certificates bearing a legend stating that such shares are restricted pursuant to Rule 144 of the Securities Act. This restriction ensures that these shares would not be immediately redistributed into the market and therefore not be part of a “public offering.” Based on an analysis of the above factors, we have met the requirements to qualify for exemption under Section 4(2) of the Securities Act for this transaction.

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not applicable.

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

~~The following~~We make forward-looking statements in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ~~(“MD&A”)~~and iselsewhere ~~intended~~in tothis ~~help~~report ~~you~~based ~~understand~~on ~~our historical~~the ~~results~~beliefs and assumptions of ~~operations~~our ~~during~~management ~~the~~and ~~periods~~on ~~presented~~information ~~and~~currently ~~our~~available ~~financial condition~~to us. ~~This~~Forward-looking ~~MD&A~~statements ~~should~~include beinformation ~~read~~about inour ~~conjunction~~possible ~~with~~or ~~our~~assumed ~~financial statements~~future ~~and~~results of operations which follow under the ~~accompanying~~headings ~~notes~~“Business and Overview,” “Liquidity and ~~contains~~Capital ~~forward-looking~~Resources,” and other statements ~~that~~ ~~involve~~throughout ~~risks~~this ~~and~~report ~~uncertainties.~~preceded ~~See~~by, followed by or that include the ~~section~~words ~~entitled~~“believes,” “~~Forward~~expects,” ~~Looking Statements~~“anticipates,” ~~above~~“intends,” “plans,” “estimates” or similar expressions.

~~EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW~~Forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in these forward-looking statements, including the risks and uncertainties described below and other factors we describe from time to time in our periodic filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). We therefore caution you not to rely unduly on any forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements in this report speak only as of the date of this report, and we undertake no obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future developments or otherwise.

We were incorporated in the State of Delaware on June 28, 2007. Since our incorporation, we had been in the process of establishing ourselves as a company in the business of distributing and selling biodiesel home processors. Our primary business will be to sell biodiesel home processors to farm communities and to non-commercial diesel machine operators in Israel, in particular, to automotive based consumers. In the future, we may also operate our own biodiesel processing facility for the aforementioned consumer market in Israel. Our activities to date have largely been to analyze and locate cost effective markets and manufactures of the biodiesel home processing kits.10

WeTable ~~have not~~of generated any revenue since our inception. We are a development stage company with limited operations. Our auditors have issued a going concern opinion. This means that our auditors believe there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an ongoing business for the next twelve months. Contents

~~PLAN~~COMPANY ~~OF OPERATION~~OVERVIEW

~~Our specific~~We ~~goal~~were isincorporated on June 28, 2007 in the State of Delaware under the name “E-18 Corp.” We entered into the Share Exchange Agreement with SquareOne, a Nevada company, and SquareOne Shareholders on June 25, 2009 (the “Closing Date”). On the Closing Date, pursuant to ~~become~~the terms of the ~~leading~~Share ~~distributor~~Exchange Agreement, we acquired all of ~~biodiesel~~the ~~home~~issued ~~processing kits~~and outstanding common stock of SquareOne from the SquareOne Shareholders. In exchange, we issued to ~~farm~~the ~~communities~~SquareOne Shareholders, their designees or assigns, 35,000,000 shares of our common stock. In addition, at the Closing Date, Hadas Yaron and toYosef ~~non-commercial~~Itamar ~~diesel~~Krytman, ~~machine~~our ~~operators~~former ~~in Israel~~officers and directors, inand ~~particular~~Avraham Yoel Zeitlin, toour ~~automotive~~principal ~~based~~shareholder, ~~consumers~~cancelled a total number of 15,000,000 shares of our common stock. WeAs ~~may~~a ~~also~~result ~~operate~~of the cancellation, the 35,000,000 shares represent approximately 77.78% of our ~~own~~ ~~biodiesel~~common ~~processing~~stock ~~facility~~issued ~~for~~and outstanding after the ~~aforementioned~~closing ~~consumer~~of ~~market~~the ~~in Israel~~share exchange transaction contemplated under the Share Exchange Agreement (the “Share Transaction”). As a result of the Share Transaction, SquareOne became our wholly-owned subsidiary.

WeOperating ~~intend to~~through ~~purchase~~SquareOne, ~~biodiesel~~we ~~home~~are ~~processing~~engaged ~~kits~~in atdeveloping ~~wholesale prices~~ and tomarketing ~~market them~~SquareOne toSafety ~~customers~~Syringe, at a ~~markup.~~new Weself-sheathing ~~will~~safety ~~seek~~hypodermic tosyringe become the sole distributor of each product we sell in our target sales territory by entering into agreements with the manufacturers of biodiesel home processing kits. We will look to locate manufacturers that can ~~deliver~~potentially ~~products~~reduce toaccidental usneedlestick ~~in a timely manner~~injuries.

InAccording ~~order~~ to ~~keep~~Occupational ~~overheard~~Safety and Health Administration report, needlestick injuries expose healthcare workers to bloodborne pathogens and millions workers in the healthcare industry and related occupations are at risk of occupational exposure to bloodborne pathogens which includes Human Immunodeficiency Virus (~~fixed~~HIV), ~~costs~~Hepatitis B Virus (HBV), ~~minimal~~Hepatitis weC ~~will~~Virus ~~incorporate~~(HCV), and others. After an injection, the ~~JIT~~blood ~~model~~remaining ~~(Just~~ on and in ~~Time)~~the ~~for~~needle ~~inventory~~may ~~management~~contain dangerous and life-threatening viruses, ~~bringing~~such as HIV, HAV, HBV, HCV, etc. Federal law and institutional policy require healthcare workers to properly and safely dispose of these contaminated devices according to specified procedures. Nonetheless, during the disposal process, these syringes can and do cause needlestick injuries, resulting in ~~inventory~~millions ~~only~~of ~~when~~injuries ~~ordered~~per ~~by our~~year, ~~customers~~which, in turn, lead to tens of thousands of cases of HIV, HBV and other infections.

WeTo ~~plan~~ reduce these accidental needlestick injuries, the applicable federal law and OSHA regulations now mandate healthcare providers to ~~make~~use safer syringes in all applications, such as automatic, self-sheathing hypodermic syringes. SquareOne Safety Syringe uses an innovative and patented safety design meeting all criteria established by Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”) regulations for such safety syringes, especially the ~~following~~automatic, ~~payment~~self-sheathing ~~terms~~criteria. ~~our~~The ~~standard:~~SquareOne Safety Syringes are intended for general use. We believe that the SquareOne Safety Syringe will replace the existing hypodermic syringes in use today to significantly reduce and possibly eliminate accidental needlestick exposure.

~~Deposit of~~PLAN ~~50%~~OF ~~of the retail price upon order and balance upon delivery.~~OPERATIONS

~~We anticipate~~Below ~~selling~~are the ~~biodiesel~~milestones ~~home~~(on ~~processing~~a ~~kits~~quarterly atbasis, apost-merger) ~~retail~~that ~~price~~we are basing our projections of ~~$6,000~~ ~~while~~positive wecash ~~expect~~flow ~~our~~on, ~~aggregate~~as ~~costs~~well ~~for~~as ~~each~~assumptions ~~kit~~regarding toour ~~amount~~capital ~~to approximately~~formation ~~$3,000~~needs.

WeFirst ~~will pay~~Quarter ~~the logistical expenses and any duties/tariff that may arise with the export/import of the processors, and we plan to include these costs in the retail price to the customer.~~2010

●	Refine plan for fabrication of tooling and equipment for Phase 1 manufacture of approximately 150,000 to 250,000 3cc SquareOne self-sheathing Safety Syringes by contract manufacturer.

●	Identify and recruit additional key sales and marketing staff in support of national distributor currently under contract with the Company.

●	As part of the Company’s campaign to expand its safety technology base to other safety needle devices beyond the hypodermic safety syringe category, file additional patent specifications for other percutaneous applications and improvements.

●	Begin demonstration of the Company’s Safety Syringe to doctors’ offices and selected hospital systems using national distributor network.

●	Identify qualified investment bankers/placement agents to continue fundraising campaign to support working capital needs for the Phase 1 Market Introduction Program.

Table of Contents

Second Quarter 2010

●	Launch fundraising campaign to raise $3.5 million to support working capital needs and to support the Phase 1 Market Introduction Program.

●	Begin accelerated tooling fabrication program to hasten completion of Phase 1 manufacturing.

●	File additional patent applications covering other applications for percutaneous devices and their improvements to round out the Company’s full line of safety needle devices.

●	Continue demonstration of the Company’s Safety Syringe to doctors’ offices and selected hospital systems using national distributor network.

●	Identify qualified public relations and investor relations firms and other service providers suitable for the Company’s product launch and advertising campaigns.

●	Launch aggressive public relations and investor relations programs

●	Identify qualified investment banking firms for capital raise of $11.5 million to support its Phase 2 Market Expansion campaign.

Third Quarter 2010

●	Complete fabrication of tooling and equipment to manufacture 150,000 to 250,000 commercial-grade units for limited distribution to doctors’ offices and hospitals.

●	Begin manufacture of first units for rigorous product testing.

●	Complete design of sales and marketing materials, including instructional materials.

●	Initiate $11.5 million capital raise to execute the Phase 2 portion of the Protectus Business Plan – Market Expansion.

Fourth Quarter 2010

●	Manufacture first 150,000 to 250,000 commercial-grade units ready for clinical use.

●	Launch in-service training program at selected healthcare institutions.

●	Expand distribution plan.

●	Initiate fabrication of tooling and automatic assembly equipment to support manufacturing at the rate of 110 million units per year of the Company’s Safety Syringe.

●	Aggressively expand the Protectus distribution and in-service training programs nationally to be able to support annual production and sales volumes of 110 million units.

●	Launch lobbying effort aimed at enforcement of the federal mandate to utilize efficacious safety needle products nationwide.

Expansion of distribution will be bolstered by a vigorous marketing campaign, as well as by education of the medical professionals and those having the interest and power to enforce the new laws covering use of hypodermic syringes and their improvements, particularly, the SquareOne device and its differential benefits.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We are a development stage company. As of December 31, 2009, we have incurred an accumulated net loss of $6,923,287. At December 31, 2009, we had cash and cash equivalents of $2,163 as compared to cash and cash equivalents of $692 as of December 31, 2008. Our independent auditor has raised concern about our ability to continue as a going concern. Management is trying to raise additional capital through sales of common stock, as well as seeking financing from third parties.

Table of Contents

	Twelve Months Ended December 31,
	2009				2008
Net Cash (Used) by Operating Activities		$	(666,514	)	$	(301,694	)

Net Cash Provided by Financing Activities		$	667,985		$	298,249

Net Increase / (Decrease) in Cash		$	1,471		$	(3,445	)

Cash, Beginning of Period		$	692		$	4,137

Cash, End of Period		$	2,163		$	692

Critical Accounting Policies

Debt Issue Costs and Debt Discount

The Company has paid debt issue costs, and recorded a debt discount in connection with raising funds through the issuance of convertible debt. These costs are amortized over the life of the debt to interest expense. If a conversion of the underlying debt occurs, a proportionate share of the unamortized amounts are immediately expensed.

Original Issue Discount

For certain debt issued in 2008, the Company provided the debt holder with an original issue discount. The original issue discount was recorded to debt discount reducing the face amount of the note and was amortized to interest expense immediately, since the underlying term of these debt instruments were due on demand.

Warrants and Derivative Liabilities

The Company reviews any common stock purchase warrants and other freestanding derivative financial instruments at each balance sheet date and will classify on the balance sheet as:

a) Equity if they (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement, or (ii) gives us a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in our own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement), or as

b) Assets or liabilities if they (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside our control), or (ii) give the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement).

The Company assesses classification of our common stock purchase warrants and other freestanding derivatives at each reporting date to determine whether a change in classification between assets and liabilities is required.

~~RESULTS OF~~Earnings ~~OPERATIONS~~per Share

~~For~~ Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the ~~years~~weighted ~~ended~~average ~~December~~number 31of common shares outstanding during the period, ~~2008~~excluding the effects of any potentially dilutive securities. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential of shares of common stock outstanding during the period including stock options or warrants, using the treasury stock method (by using the average stock price for the period to determine the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants), and ~~December~~convertible 31debt or convertible preferred stock, ~~2007~~using the if-converted method. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential of shares of common stock if their effect is anti-dilutive.

WeRecent ~~have not~~Accounting ~~generated any revenues since inception, including for the year ended December 31, 2008. Our operating activities during these periods consisted primarily of developing our business plan.~~Pronouncements

~~General and~~In ~~administrative~~January 2010, ~~expenses~~the ~~were~~Financial ~~$32,852~~Accounting ~~for~~Standards ~~the~~Board ~~year~~(FASB) issued ~~ended~~Accounting ~~December~~Standards 31Update No. 2010-06, ~~2008~~“Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (“ASU 2010-06”). ASU 2010-06 amends ASC 820, ~~compared~~ “Fair Value Measurements” ("ASC 820") to ~~$20~~require a number of additional disclosures regarding fair value measurements. The amended guidance requires entities to disclose the amounts of significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the reasons for these transfers,~~886~~ the reasons for any transfers in or out of Level 3, and information in the ~~year~~reconciliation ~~ended~~of ~~December~~recurring 31Level 3 measurements about purchases, ~~2007~~sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis. The ~~increase~~ASU also clarifies the requirement for entities to disclose information about both the valuation techniques and inputs used in ~~general~~ estimating Level 2 and ~~administrative~~Level ~~expenses~~3 fair value measurements. The amended guidance was ~~due~~effective for financial periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except the requirement to andisclose ~~increase~~Level in3 ~~our~~transactions ~~activity level.~~on ~~General~~a ~~and~~gross ~~administrative~~basis, ~~expenses~~which ~~primarily~~becomes ~~consist~~effective offor ~~professional fees~~financial periods beginning after December 15, ~~and~~2010. ~~filing~~ASU ~~fee~~2010-06 ~~expenses~~did not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Our net loss for the year ended December 31, 2008, was $32,852 or $0.01 per share, compared to $20,886 or $0.01 per share for the year ended December 31, 2007. The weighted average number of shares outstanding was 5,000,000 at December 31, 2008, compared to 3,600,519 at December 31, 2007.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

As of December 31, 2008

As of December 31, 2008, our current assets were $14,958 and our current liabilities were $8,396, resulting in working capital of $6,562.

As of December 31, 2008, our total liabilities were $8,396, compared to total liabilities of $20,000 as of December 31, 2007, all consisting of current liabilities.

Stockholders’ equity decreased from of $38,064 at December 31, 2007, to equity of $6,562 at December 31, 2008. This was mainly a result of the net loss for the year ended December 31, 2008.

For the year ended December 31, 2008, net cash used in operating activities was $45,952, compared to net cash used in operating activities of $886 for the year ended December 31, 2007. Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2008 was mainly the result of a net loss and payment of accrued liabilities.

For the year ended December 31, 2008, net cash used in investing activities was $0, compared to net cash used in investing activities of $0 for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Net cash flows from financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2008 was $2,746, compared to net cash flows from financing activities of $58,950 for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Going Concern

Our registered independent auditors included an explanatory paragraph in their report on the accompanying financial statements regarding concerns about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements contain additional note disclosures describing the circumstances that lead to this disclosure by our registered independent auditors. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of that uncertainty.

We currently estimate that we will require an additional $50,000 to fund our operations for the subsequent 12 month period. There are no assurances that we will be able to obtain funds required for our continued operation. There can be no assurance that additional financing will be available to us when needed or, if available, that it can be obtained on commercially reasonable terms. If we are not able to obtain the additional financing on a timely basis, we will not be able to meet our other obligations as they become due and we will be forced to scale down or perhaps even cease the operation of our business. The issuance of additional equity securities by us could result in a significant dilution in the equity interests of our current stockholders. Obtaining commercial loans, assuming those loans would be available, will increase our liabilities and future cash commitments.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

There are no off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is material to investors.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Our financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and the related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and during the applicable periods. We base these estimates on historical experience and on other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions and could have a material impact on our financial statements.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

Refer to Note 1 to the Financial Statements entitled “Recent Accounting Pronouncements” included in this annual report for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements and their impact on our Financial Statements.

In June 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Staff Position No. EITF No. 03-6-1, “Determining Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities” (“FSP EITF No. 03-6-1”). According to FSP EITF No. 03-6-1, unvested share-based payment awards that contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents are considered participating securities under SFAS No. 128. As such, they should be included in the computation of basic earnings per share (“EPS”) using the two-class method. FSP EITF No. 03-6-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, as well as interim periods within those years. Once effective, all prior-period EPS data presented must be adjusted retrospectively. The Company does not expect FSP EITF No. 03-6-1 to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In March 2008, the FASB issued Statement No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities,” an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS No. 161 applies to all derivative instruments and nonderivative instruments that are designated and qualify as hedging instruments and related hedged items accounted for under SFAS No. 133. SFAS No. 161 requires entities to provide greater transparency through additional disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, results of operations, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008. The Company does not expect SFAS No. 161 to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141 (revised), “Business Combinations” (“SFAS No. 141(R)”). SFAS No. 141(R) significantly changes the accounting for business combinations and establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed and any noncontrolling interest in the acquiree and recognizes and measures the goodwill acquired in the business combination or a gain from a bargain purchase. SFAS No. 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements” - an amendment of ARB No. 51 (“SFAS No. 160”). SFAS No. 160 changes the accounting for noncontrolling (minority) interests in consolidated financial statements including the requirements to classify noncontrolling interests as a component of consolidated shareholders’ equity, the elimination of “minority interest” accounting in results of operations and changes in the accounting for both increases and decreases in a parent’s controlling ownership interest. SFAS No. 160 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008, and early adoption is prohibited. The Company does not expect SFAS No. 160 to have a material impact on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 159 “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” including an amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 (“SFAS No. 159”), which allows an entity the irrevocable option to elect fair value for the initial and subsequent measurement for certain financial assets and liabilities under an instrument-by-instrument election. If the fair value option is elected for an instrument, subsequent changes in fair value for that instrument will be recognized in earnings. SFAS No. 159 also establishes additional disclosure requirements and is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, with early adoption permitted provided that the entity also adopts Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS No. 157”). SFAS No. 159 is not expected to have a material impact on its results of operations or financial position.

In September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157 which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. In February 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. SFAS No. 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which provides a one-year deferral of the effective date of SFAS No. 157 for non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed in the financial statements at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually). The adoption of SFAS No. 157 for financial assets and financial liabilities is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position.

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable.

Table of Contents

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

~~The financial~~PROTECTUS ~~statements~~MEDICAL ~~required by this item are included in this report in Part IV~~DEVICES, ~~Item 15 beginning on page F-1~~INC.

(A DEVELOPMENT STAGE COMPANY)

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2009 AND 2008 (RESTATED)

AND FOR THE PERIOD FROM SEPTEMBER 21, 1999 (INCEPTION)

TO DECEMBER 31, 2009

	Page(s)

Report of Independent Registered Accounting Firm	F-1

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2009 and 2008	F-2

Consolidated Statements of Operations For the Years Ended –
December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Restated), and from
September 21, 1999 (inception) to December 31, 2009	F-3

Consolidated Statement of Stockholders’ Deficit For the Years Ended –
December 31, 2009 and 2008 (restated), and from
September 21, 1999 (inception) to December 31, 2009	F-4

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows For the Years Ended –
December 31, 2009 and 2008 (restated), and from
September 21, 1999 (inception) to December 31, 2009	F-5

Notes to the Financial Statements	F-6-F-27

Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and

Stockholders of Protectus Medical Devices, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Protectus Medical Devices, Inc. as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2009 and the period September 21, 1999 (date of inception) through December 31, 2009. Protectus Medical Devices, Inc.’s management is responsible for these financial statements. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Protectus Medical Devices, Inc. as of December 31, 2009 and 2008, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2009 and the period September 21, 1999 (date of inception) through December 31, 2009 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As shown in the accompanying financial statements, as of December 31, 2009 the Company had negative working capital of approximately $3.2 million and had an accumulated deficit of approximately $6.9 million. These factors raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans regarding these matters are described in Note 3. The consolidated financial statements do not include adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ Bartolomei Pucciarelli, LLC

Lawrenceville, NJ

May 17, 2010

F-1

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc. and Subsidiary
(A development stage company)
Consolidated Balance Sheets

	December 31, 2009			December 31, 2008
				(Restated)
Assets

Current Assets:
Cash		2,163			692
Total Current Assets		2,163			692

Debt issue costs - net		-			3,750

Total Assets		2,163			4,442

Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit

Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		1,154,458			907,848
Notes payable - net of debt discount		1,038,796			1,015,207
Notes payable - related party		270,000			270,000
Convertible notes payable		-			-
Accrued interest payable		301,651			188,067
Derivative liabilities - debt and warrants		440,874			-
Total Current Liabilities		3,205,779			2,381,122

Long Term Liabilities:
Convertible notes payable - net of debt discount		132,168			-
Total Long Term Liabilities:		132,168			-

Total Liabilities		3,337,947			2,381,122

Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized,
45,887,936 and 45,000,000 shares issued and outstanding		4,589			4,500
Additional paid in capital		3,582,914			2,637,260
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(6,923,287	)		(5,018,440	)
Total Stockholders' Deficit		(3,335,784	)		(2,376,680	)

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit		2,163			4,442

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

F-2

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc. and Subsidiary
(A development stage company)
Consolidated Statements of Operations
	For the Year Ended			For the Year Ended			September 21, 1999 (inception) to
	December 31, 2009			December 31, 2008			December 31, 2009
				(Restated)

Operating expenses
Research and development		-			-			135,069
General and administrative expenses		1,548,368			826,947			5,112,419
Total operating expenses		1,548,368			826,947			5,247,488

Loss from operations		(1,548,368	)		(826,947	)		(5,247,488	)

Other income (expense)
Interest income		112			68			6,033
Other income		40,000			-			40,000
Interest expense		(395,090	)		(751,641	)		(1,566,483	)
Derivative expense		(1,027,168	)		-			(1,181,017	)
Change in fair value of derivative financial instrument		1,025,667			-			1,025,667
Other income (expense) - net		(356,479	)		(751,573	)		(1,675,800	)

Net loss	$	(1,904,847	)	$	(1,578,520	)	$	(6,923,288	)

Net Loss per Common Share - Basic and Diluted	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.17	)

Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding		45,190,367			45,000,000			41,193,989

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

F-3

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc. and Subsidiary
(A development stage company)
Consolidated Statement of Stockholders' Deficit
For the Years Ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 (restated) and from September 21, 1999 (inception) to December 31, 2009


	Common Stock									Deficit Accumulated
	Shares			Amount			Additional Paid-In Capital			during the Development Stage			Stockholders' Deficit

Stock issued to founders for services rendered ($0.0012/share)		6,300,093		$	630		$	6,620		$	-		$	7,250

Recognition of stock based compensation - options		-			-			956			-			956

Warrants issued for services rendered - related party		-			-			99,832			-			99,832

Net loss for the period from September 21, 1999 (inception) to December 31, 1999		-			-			-			(108,714	)		(108,714	)

Balance, December 31, 1999		6,300,093			630			107,408			(108,714	)		(676	)

Cancellation of founder shares		(6,300,093	)		(630	)		630			-			-

Stock issued to acquire intellectual property ($0.0012/share)		41,059,224			4,106			43,144			-			47,250

Recognition of stock based compensation - options		-			-			824			-			824

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2000		-			-			-			(57,873	)		(57,873	)

Balance, December 31, 2000		41,059,224			4,106			152,006			(166,587	)		(10,475	)

Recognition of stock based compensation - options		-			-			1,060			-			1,060

Warrants issued for services rendered		-			-			778			-			778

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2001		-			-			-			(109,443	)		(109,443	)

Balance, December 31, 2001		41,059,224			4,106			153,844			(276,030	)		(118,080	)

Recognition of stock based compensation - options		-			-			2,250			-			2,250

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2002		-			-			-			(93,416	)		(93,416	)

Balance, December 31, 2002		41,059,224			4,106			156,094			(369,446	)		(209,246	)

Issuance of common stock for cash ($0.1151/share)		1,911,752			191			219,809			-			220,000

Cash paid as direct offering costs		-			-			(30,000	)		-			(30,000	)

Recognition of stock based compensation - options		-			-			2,250			-			2,250

Reclassification of debt discount associated with derivative liability		-			-			97,116			-			97,116

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2003		-			-			-			(387,011	)		(387,011	)

Balance, December 31, 2003		42,970,976			4,297			445,269			(756,457	)		(306,891	)

Recognition of stock based compensation - options		-			-			1,190			-			1,190

Exercise of stock option - related party ($0.0023/share)		1,737,957			174			3,826			-			4,000

Recognition of beneficial conversion feature		-			-			149,801			-			149,801

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2004		-			-			-			(251,988	)		(251,988	)

Balance, December 31, 2004		44,708,933			4,471			600,086			(1,008,445	)		(403,888	)

Recognition of stock based compensation - options		-			-			827			-			827

Warrants issued for services rendered - related party		-			-			24,956			-			24,956

Reclassification of derivative liability		-			-			106,732			-			106,732

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2005		-			-			-			(517,241	)		(517,241	)

Balance, December 31, 2005		44,708,933			4,471			732,601			(1,525,686	)		(788,614	)

Issuance of common stock for cash ($0.3453/share)		291,066			29			100,471			-			100,500

Recognition of stock based compensation - options		-			-			990			-			990

Warrants issued for services rendered - related parties		-			-			749,996			-			749,996

Warrants issued for loan extension fee		-			-			29,136			-			29,136

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2006		-			-			-			(1,342,747	)		(1,342,747	)

Balance, December 31, 2006		45,000,000			4,500			1,613,194			(2,868,433	)		(1,250,739	)

Recognition of stock based compensation - options		-			-			990			-			990

Warrants issued for loan extension fee		-			-			29,126			-			29,126

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2007		-			-			-			(571,486	)		(571,486	)

Balance, December 31, 2007		45,000,000			4,500			1,643,310			(3,439,919	)		(1,792,109	)

Recognition of stock based compensation - options		-			-			163			-			163

Warrants issued for services rendered - related party		-			-			50,000			-			50,000

Warrants issued for loan extension fee		-			-			469,018			-			469,018

Recognition of beneficial conversion feature		-			-			474,769			-			474,769

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2008		-			-			-			(1,578,521	)		(1,578,521	)

Balance, December 31, 2008		45,000,000			4,500			2,637,260			(5,018,440	)		(2,376,680	)

Stock issued for services (Average of $0.69/share)		550,000			55			379,195			-			379,250

Stock issued in connection with debt conversion ($0.30/share)		337,936			34			99,966			-			100,000

Warrants issued for services		-			-			233,380			-			233,380

Reclassification of derivative liability		-			-			233,113			-			233,113

Net loss for the year ended December 31, 2009		-			-			-			(1,904,847	)		(1,904,847	)

Balance, December 31, 2009		45,887,936		$	4,589		$	3,582,914		$	(6,923,287	)	$	(3,335,784	)

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

F-4

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc. and Subsidiary
(A development stage company)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

	For the Year Ended			For the Year Ended			September 21, 1999 (inception) to
	December 31, 2009			December 31, 2008			December 31, 2009
				(Restated)

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
Net loss	$	(1,904,847	)	$	(1,578,520	)	$	(6,923,288	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Amortization of debt issue costs		3,750			9,667			26,750
Amortization of debt discount		260,257			502,856			906,738
Derivative expense		1,027,169			-			1,181,017
Change in fair value of derivative liability		(1,025,667	)		-			(1,025,667	)
Stock based compensation - founders		-			-			7,250
Stock based compensation		379,250			162			390,750
Stock issued to acquire intellectual property		-			-			47,250
Warrants issued for services - related party		-			50,000			924,784
Warrants issued for loan extension fee		-			469,018			527,280
Warrants issued for services		233,380			-			234,158
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
Increase (Decrease) in:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		246,610			174,755			1,154,458
Accrued interest payable		113,584			70,368			301,651
Net Cash Used in Operating Activities		(666,514	)		(301,694	)		(2,246,869	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
Proceeds from notes payable		-			299,499			1,043,297
Proceeds from notes payable - related party		-			-			270,000
Proceeds from issuance of convertible debt		672,485			-			672,485
Payment of debt issuance costs in cash		-			(1,250	)		(26,750	)
Proceeds from issuance of stock		-			-			320,500
Cash paid as direct offering costs		-			-			(30,000	)
Proceeds from exercise of warrant - related party		-			-			4,000
Repayment of note		(4,500	)		-			(4,500	)
Net Cash Provided By Financing Activities		667,985			298,249			2,249,032

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash		1,471			(3,445	)		2,163

Cash and Cash Equivalents - Beginning of Year/Period		692			4,137			-

Cash and Cash Equivalents - End of Year/Period	$	2,163		$	692			2,163

SUPPLEMENTARY CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash Paid During the Year/Period for:
Income taxes	$	-		$	-		$	-
Interest	$	-		$	-		$	-

SUPPLEMENTARY DISCLOSURE OF NON-CASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES:

Debt discount on derivative liability	$	672,485		$	-		$	672,485
Beneficial conversion feature	$	0		$	0		$	731,302
Conversion of debt equity	$	100,000			-			-
Reclassification of derivative liability to additional paid in capital	$	233,113		$	-		$	97,116

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

F-5

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Restated)

Note 1

Basis of Presentation and Nature of Operations

Nature of operations

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc. (the “Company) (“Protectus”) was incorporated in the State of Delaware on June 28, 2007 as E-18 Corp. and is a development stage company. On June 25, 2009 the Company entered into a share exchange agreement with SquareOne Medical, Inc. a Nevada corporation resulting in a change of control. On June 26, 2009 the shareholders also agreed to change the Company’s name to Protectus Medical Devices, Inc.

Reverse Acquisition and Recapitalization and Share Purchase Agreement

On June 25, 2009, E-18, a then public shell corporation, merged with Protectus and Protectus became the surviving corporation, in a transaction treated as a reverse acquisition. E-18 did not have any operations and majority-voting control was transferred to Protectus. The transaction required a recapitalization of Protectus. Since Protectus acquired a controlling voting interest, it was deemed the accounting acquirer, while E-18 was deemed the legal acquirer. The historical financial statements of the Company are those of Protectus, and of the consolidated entities from the date of merger and subsequent. Since the transaction is considered a reverse acquisition and recapitalization, accounting guidance does not apply for purposes of presenting pro-forma financial information.

With the acquisition of SquareOne Medical, Inc. the Company has changed its intended business operation from a distributor of biodiesel home processing kits to a medical device firm that designs, engineers and manufactures safety needle devices to protect healthcare workers from accidental needle stick injuries. The Company has developed and patented a safety hypodermic syringe as its lead product with other proprietary OSHA compliant medical safety devices to follow.

Note 2

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.

Such estimates and assumptions impact, among others, the following: the fair value of warrants granted in connection with various financing transactions, share-based payments, fair value of derivative liabilities, and accrued payroll taxes and related penalties and interest.

F-6

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Restated)

Making estimates requires management to exercise significant judgment. It is at least reasonably possible that the estimate of the effect of a condition, situation or set of circumstances that existed at the date of the financial statements, which management considered in formulating its estimate could change in the near term due to one or more future confirming events. Accordingly, the actual results could differ significantly from estimates.

Development Stage

The Company's financial statements are presented as those of a development stage enterprise. Activities during the development stage primarily include debt funding; equity based financing, and further implementation of the business plan. The Company will look to obtain additional debt and/or equity related funding opportunities.

Risks and uncertainties

The Company operates in an industry that is subject to intense competition and change in consumer demand. The Company's operations are subject to significant risk and uncertainties including financial and operational risks including the potential risk of business failure. See Note 3 regarding going concern uncertainty.

Cash and cash equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

The Company minimizes its credit risk associated with cash by periodically evaluating the credit quality of its primary financial institution. The balance at times may exceed federally insured limits.

Debt Issue Costs and Debt Discount

Original Issue Discount

F-7

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Restated)

Fair value of financial instruments

The carrying amounts of the Company’s short-term financial instruments, including the Company’s current liabilities (exclusive of derivative liabilities), approximate fair value due to the relatively short period to maturity for these instruments.

Warrants and Derivative Liabilities

The Company reviews any common stock purchase warrants and other freestanding derivative financial instruments at each balance sheet date and will classify on the balance sheet as:

Equity if they (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement, or (ii) gives us a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in our own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement), or as

Assets or liabilities if they (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside our control), or (ii) give the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement).

Segment information

During 2009 and 2008, the Company only operated in one segment; therefore, segment information has not been presented.

Share Based Payments

Generally, all forms of share-based payments, including stock option grants, restricted stock grants and stock appreciation rights, are measured at their fair value on the awards’ grant date, and based on the estimated number of awards that are ultimately expected to vest. Share-based payment awards issued to non-employees for services rendered are recorded at either the fair value of the services rendered or the fair value of the share-based payment, whichever is more readily determinable. For historic fiscal years when there was not an observable active, liquid market for the Company’s common stock, the valuation of the shares issued in a non-cash share payment transaction relies on observation of arms-length transactions where cash was received for its shares, before and after the non-cash share payment date. The expense resulting from share-based payments are recorded as a component of general and administrative expense.

F-8

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Restated)

Earnings per Share

Basic earnings per share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing net loss available to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period, excluding the effects of any potentially dilutive securities. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential of shares of common stock outstanding during the period including stock options or warrants, using the treasury stock method (by using the average stock price for the period to determine the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants), and convertible debt or convertible preferred stock, using the if-converted method. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential of shares of common stock if their effect is anti-dilutive.

The computation of basic and diluted loss per share for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 excludes the following potentially dilutive securities because their inclusion would be anti-dilutive due to the Company’s net loss during the period:

	December 31, 2009		December 31, 2008
Convertible notes		1,611,211		-
Stock options		2,177,616		2,027,614
Stock warrants		12,440,869		8,594,865
Total common stock equivalents		16,229,696		10,622,479

In connection with the 4 for 1 forward split in 2008, and the reverse merger/recapitalization in June 2009, all share and per share amounts have been retroactively restated.

Income Taxes

The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse.

The Company uses a two-step approach to recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates it is more likely than not, that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step is to measure the tax benefit as the largest amount, which is more than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The Company considers many factors when evaluating and estimating our tax positions and tax benefits, which may require periodic adjustments. At December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively, the Company did not record any liabilities for uncertain tax positions.

F-9

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Restated)

Recent accounting pronouncements

In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-06, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements (“ASU 2010-06”). ASU 2010-06 amends ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements” ("ASC 820") to require a number of additional disclosures regarding fair value measurements. The amended guidance requires entities to disclose the amounts of significant transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and the reasons for these transfers, the reasons for any transfers in or out of Level 3, and information in the reconciliation of recurring Level 3 measurements about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements on a gross basis. The ASU also clarifies the requirement for entities to disclose information about both the valuation techniques and inputs used in estimating Level 2 and Level 3 fair value measurements. The amended guidance was effective for financial periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except the requirement to disclose Level 3 transactions on a gross basis, which becomes effective for financial periods beginning after December 15, 2010. ASU 2010-06 did not have a significant effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.

Note 3 Going Concern and Liquidity

As reflected in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has a net loss of $1,904,847 and net cash used in operations of $666,514 for the year ended December 31, 2009; a working capital deficit of $3,203,616, and has and a stockholders’ deficit of $3,335,784 at December 31, 2009.

The ability of the Company to continue its operations is dependent on Management's plans, which include the raising of capital through debt and/or equity markets with some additional funding from other traditional financing sources, including term notes and convertible notes, until such time that funds provided by operations are sufficient to fund working capital requirements. The Company is in default on many of its term debt obligations, and has other notes that are due on demand, yet remain outstanding. The Company may need to incur additional liabilities with certain related parties to sustain the Company’s existence. Since inception the Company has been in the development stage and has generated no sales to date.

The Company will require additional funding to finance the growth of its current and expected future operations as well as to achieve its strategic objectives. The Company believes its current available cash along with anticipated revenues may be insufficient to meet its cash needs for the near future. There can be no assurance that financing will be available in amounts or terms acceptable to the Company, if at all. The Company believes that the utilization of its products may provide future positive cash flows.

F-10

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Restated)

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and the satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business. These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recovery of the recorded assets or the classification of the liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.

In response to these problems, management has taken the following actions:

●	Raising additional capital through various debt offerings;

●	Cutting costs where possible; and

●	Focusing efforts on further development of the core product, which is dependent upon continued financing

Note 4 Debt, Debt Discount and Debt Issue Costs

(A)	Convertible Debt

During 2001, the Company issued convertible debt totaling $50,000, due two years from the issuance date. These notes can convert at 50% of the market price for any offering occurring after March 2001. The market price on the commitment date was $0.01, based upon the fair value of shares issued to acquire intellectual property from a third party. In the event that the debt is converted, the Company would issue five year warrants having an exercise price equal to 75% of the shares issued upon conversion of the underlying debt. The exercise price would be equal to 90% of the sales price in a future offering, however, the maximum exercise price is $1.80. Principal is automatically convertible if a future equity offering of $1,000,000 occurs in a single offering transaction. The Company has determined these notes were derivative financial instruments.

The Company computed the fair value of the conversion feature only at the commitment date, since the warrants are contingent upon a debt conversion, based on the following management assumptions:

Expected dividends	0%
Expected volatility	286%
Expected term: conversion feature	2 years
Risk free interest rate	4.25% - 4.28%

The fair value of the embedded conversion option was $97,116. The Company recorded a related debt discount of $50,000, and a derivative expense of $47,116.

In 2003, upon the expiration of these notes, the discount was fully amortized. The Company determined that the derivative liability should be marked to market and then, the resulting amount would be reclassified to equity since the derivative ceased to exist upon the issuance of new debt instruments.

F-11

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Restated)

The Company computed the fair value of the conversion feature on the maturity date totaling $97,116, based on the following management assumptions:

Expected dividends	0%
Expected volatility	286%
Expected term: conversion feature	None
Risk free interest rate	1.57% - 4.25%

The $97,116 was reclassified to additional paid in capital to reflect the characteristics of the instrument ceasing to be a derivative financial instrument.

The Company then issued new debt instruments under the same terms as the original notes; however, the original notes had a carrying amount of $55,000 in 2003. The Company then recorded these new debt instruments as derivative financial instruments, however, since no proceeds were received, no new debt discount was recorded.

The Company computed the fair value of the conversion feature only at the commitment date, since the warrants are contingent upon a debt conversion, based on the following management assumptions:

Expected dividends	0%
Expected volatility	286%
Expected term: conversion feature	2 years
Risk free interest rate	1.38% - 1.57%

The market price on the commitment date was $0.01 for $27,500, based upon the fair value of shares issued to acquire intellectual property from a third party. The Company used a market price of $1 for the other $27,500 based upon a recent cash offering price with a third party.

The fair value of the embedded conversion option was $106,733. The Company recorded a related derivative expense of $106,733. The $106,733 was reclassified to additional paid in capital since the underlying term of the debt had expired. As a result, the debt became due on demand.

(B)	Demand notes

In 2001, the Company issued notes totaling $120,000. These notes were due in 2002, and are currently in default. These notes bear interest at 10% and are unsecured.

In April 2003, the Company executed a note for $9,000. The note was non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on demand.

In June 2005, the Company executed a note for $49,796. The note bore interest at 8%, is unsecured and due on demand.

F-12

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Restated)

In October 2005, the Company executed a note for $50,000. The note was non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on demand. In connection with raising these funds, the Company paid $7,500 in debt issue costs.

In June 2006, the Company executed a note for $50,000 with a member of management. The note bore interest at 8%, is unsecured and due on demand.

In December 2008, the Company executed a note for $4,500. The note was non-interest bearing, unsecured and due on demand. The note was repaid in April 2009.

(C)	Exchangeable Debt

In September 2004, the Company executed notes totaling $500,000, of which $100,000 was to a member of management. These notes bear interest at 7%, are unsecured and due December 31, 2009. The debt holders also received an aggregate 1,013,808 warrants. The warrants are exercisable at $0.30 share. The warrants expire on December 31, 2009. The Company determined that these warrants should be valued at fair value and a related debt discount should be computed. The Company computed a fair value of $149,801 for the warrants. Fair value was based upon the following:

Expected dividends	0%
Expected volatility	286%
Expected term: conversion feature	5 years
Risk free interest rate	3.33%

The note holders may convert the unpaid principal and accrued interest into the purchase of the warrants. The Company has not repaid these notes on the maturity date, and expects to receive a default notice from these note holders.

The note holders are also entitled to a production bonus from product sales up to $1.25 per each dollar invested. There have been no sales since inception and no accrual for the production bonus.

In connection with the sale of these debt instruments the Company was required to pay $40,000 in placement agent fees. These fees are in dispute, however, they have been accrued as a component of accounts payable and accrued expenses.

(D)	Debt with warrants

During 2007, the Company executed notes totaling $180,000. All notes were due one year from issuance, and are in default. These notes bear interest at 10% and are unsecured. The debt holders also received an aggregate 405,523 warrants. The warrants are exercisable at $0.44/share. The warrants expire in 2012. The Company determined that these warrants should be valued at fair value and a related debt discount should be computed. In connection with raising these funds, the Company paid $18,000 in debt issue costs.

The Company determined that these warrants should be valued at fair value and a related debt discount should be computed. The Company computed a fair value of $179,769 for the warrants.

F-13

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Restated)

Fair value was based upon the following:

Expected dividends	0%
Expected volatility	286%
Expected term: conversion feature	5 years
Risk free interest rate	3.10%

(E)	Debt with original issue discounts

During 2008, the Company executed notes totaling $295,000, of which $100,000 was to a related party. These notes had a face amount of $147,500, however, the note holder was entitled to principal repayment equal to twice the investment made. The additional $147,500 was recorded as interest expense on the date of execution since there was no term for the underlying debt. All notes were due on demand. These notes were non-interest bearing, and are unsecured. In connection with raising these funds, the Company paid $1,250 in debt issue costs.

In March 2009, these debt holders also received an aggregate 996,911 warrants. The warrants are exercisable at $0.30/share. The warrants expire in 2014.

The Company determined that these warrants should be valued at fair value and a related debt discount should be computed. The Company computed a fair value of $295,000 for the warrants. The discount was amortized in 2008 since these notes were due on demand.

Fair value was based upon the following:

Expected dividends	0%
Expected volatility	286%
Expected term: conversion feature	5 years
Risk free interest rate	3.41%

F-14

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Restated)

(F)	Convertible Debt and Derivative Liability

During the period from April – June 2009, the Company issued convertible debt totaling $437,973, due three years from the issuance date. The notes bear interest at 10% and are unsecured. These notes can convert at $0.30 (equivalent shares of 1,480,139). These note holders also received 1,480,139 warrants. The warrants are convertible at $0.30, and expire April – June 2011. On October 14, 2009, two debt holders converted aggregate principal of $100,000 into 337,936 shares of common stock. As a result of this conversion, only 1,142,187 equivalent shares remain associated with the debt. A total of 2,622,326 equivalent shares remain upon future conversion.

During the period from July – December 2009, the Company issued convertible debt totaling $234,514, due three years from the issuance date. The notes bear interest at 10% and are unsecured. These notes can convert at $0.50 (equivalent shares of 469,024). These note holders also received 469,024 warrants. Total equivalent shares upon conversion are 938,048 shares. The warrants are convertible at $0.50, and expire April – December 2011. See Note 10 regarding additional conversion of $50,000.

The Company determined under ASC 815, that the embedded conversion feature and the warrant grants (ratchet down of exercise price based upon lower exercise price in any future offerings) are not indexed to the Company’s own stock and, therefore, is an embedded derivative financial liability (the “Embedded Derivative”), which requires bifurcation and to be separately accounted for. At each reporting period, the Company marks these derivative financial instruments to fair value. The fair value of the conversion features and warrants are summarized as follow:

Fair value at the commitment date for convertible notes and warrants issued during 2009	$	1,699,654
Reclassification of derivative liability to additional paid in capital in connection with debt conversion		(233,113	)
Fair value mark to market adjustment at December 31, 2009		(1,025,667	)
Derivative liability balance at December 31, 2009	$	440,874

The Company recorded the derivative liability to debt discount to the extent of the face amount of the notes and expensed immediately the remaining value of the derivative as it exceeded the face amount of the note. The Company recorded a debt discount of $672,485. The Company recorded a derivative expense for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008 of $1,027,168 and $0, respectively.

F-15

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Restated)

The Company measured the fair value of the conversion features and warrants using a Black-Scholes valuation model based upon the following management assumptions on the commitment date:

Expected dividends	0%
Expected volatility	150%
Expected term: conversion feature	2.0
Expected term: warrants	2.0
Risk free interest rate	2.00%

Mark to Market

At December 31, 2009, the Company remeasured the conversion features and recorded a fair value adjustment of $1,025,667. The following management assumptions were considered:


Expected dividends	0%
Expected volatility	150%
Risk fee interest rate	1.14%
Expected life of conversion features in years	1.43 – 1.94
Expected life of warrants in years	1.43 – 1.94

(G)

Summary

The following is a summary of all debt raised and debt discount for the period from September 21, 1999 (inception) to December 31, 2009.

Year ended December 31,	Proceeds
1999	$	-
2000		-
2001		170,000
2002		-
2003		9,000
2004		500,000
2005		99,796
2006		50,000
2007		180,000
2008		299,500
2009		672,485
Total	$	1,980,781

F-16

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Restated)

The following is a summary of all debt issue costs paid for the period from September 21, 1999 (inception) to December 31, 2009.

Year ended December 31,		Payments
1999	$	-
2000		-
2001		-
2002		-
2003		-
2004		-
2005		7,500
2006		-
2007		18,000
2008		1,250
Total	$	26,750

All debt issue costs have been fully amortized

Note 5 Fair Value

The Company has categorized our assets and liabilities recorded at fair value based upon the fair value hierarchy specified by GAAP.

The levels of fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1 inputs utilize unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access;

Level 2 inputs utilize other-than-quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals; and

Level 3 inputs are unobservable and are typically based on our own assumptions, including situations where there is little, if any, market activity.

In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the Company categorizes such financial asset or liability based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

F-17

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Restated)

Both observable and unobservable inputs may be used to determine the fair value of positions that are classified within the Level 3 category. As a result, the unrealized gains and losses for assets within the Level 2 category presented in the tables below may include changes in fair value that were attributable to both observable and unobservable inputs.

The following are the major categories of liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, using quoted prices in active markets for identical liabilities (Level 1); significant other observable inputs (Level 2); and significant unobservable inputs (Level 3):

	Level 1: Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Liabilities		Level 2: Significant Other Observable Inputs		Level 3: Significant Unobservable Inputs		Total at December 31, 2009
Derivative Liabilities	$	-	$	440,874	$	-	$	440,874
Total	$	-	$	440,874	$	-	$	440,874

There were no derivative financial instruments in 2008.

Note 6 Accrued Payroll Tax Liabilities

For several years prior to becoming a public Company, the Company inappropriately paid its employees and officers as subcontractors without proper tax withholdings. The Company has prepared payroll tax filings to correct the matter with the IRS and state taxing authorities. The Company has accrued an estimate for the payroll tax liabilities and related penalties and interest. The Company plans to file the appropriate tax filings and resolve the liabilities with the taxing authorities in the near term. The accrued payroll taxes and related penalties and interest were estimated at $585,391 and $444,996 at December 31, 2009 and 2008, respectively. This amount is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses on the accompanying balance sheet. To the extent this estimate is insufficient, additional accruals may be required in future periods.

Note 7 Stockholders’ Deficit

(A)	Common Stock

In September 1999, the Company issued 6,300,093 shares of common stock to its founders for services rendered. The shares had a fair value of $7,250 ($0.0012/share). Fair value was based upon the services rendered. In March 2000, these shares were cancelled for no additional consideration.

F-18

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Restated)

In May 2000, the Company issued 41,059,224 shares of common stock to acquire intellectual property. The shares had a fair value of $47,250 ($0.0012/share). Fair value was based upon the services rendered to the Company’s founders.

In May 2003, the Company issued 1,911,752 shares of common stock for $220,000 ($0.1151/share). In connection with the sale of these shares, the Company paid direct offering costs of $30,000.

In October 2004, the Company issued 1,737,957 shares of common stock for $4,000, in connection with the conversion of warrants held by a member of management.

In March 2006, the Company issued 291,067 shares of common stock for $100,500 ($0.3453/share).

In 2009, the Company issued 550,000 shares of common stock for services rendered, having a fair value of $379,250, based upon the quoted closing trading price having an average of $0.69/share.

In 2009, the Company issued 337,936 shares of common stock, in connection with the conversion of debt, having a fair value of $100,000 ($0.30/share). There was no gain or loss on conversion.

(B)	Warrants Issued for Services and Loan Extension Fee

In 1999, the Company issued 1,351,744 warrants to a member of management having a fair value of $99,832. The warrants had an exercise price of $0.003/share, and were exercised in October 2004 (see above).

The Company determined the fair value of these warrants, based upon the following management assumptions:

Expected dividends	0%
Expected volatility	286%
Expected term	5 years
Risk free interest rate	6.13%

In 2001, the Company issued 337,936 warrants to a member of management, and 506,904 warrants to third parties having a fair value of $778. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.24/share, and expired in 2007.

F-19

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Restated)

The Company determined the fair value of these warrants, based upon the following management assumptions:

Expected dividends	0%
Expected volatility	286%
Expected term	6 years
Risk free interest rate	6.32%

In 2005, the Company issued 337,936 warrants to a member of management having a fair value of $24,956. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.30/share, and expire in 2010.

The Company determined the fair value of these warrants, based upon the following management assumptions:

Expected dividends	0%
Expected volatility	286%
Expected term	5 years
Risk free interest rate	4.56%

In 2006, the Company issued 5,069,040 warrants to members of management having a fair value of $749,996. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.44/share, and expire in 2016.

The Company determined the fair value of these warrants, based upon the following management assumptions:

Expected dividends	0%
Expected volatility	286%
Expected term	10 years
Risk free interest rate	5.01%

In 2006, the Company issued 199,378 warrants as a loan extension fee, having a fair value of $29,136. The terms of the loan were not changed in connection with granting these warrants. These warrants have an exercise price of $0.44/share, and expire in 2009.

The Company determined the fair value of these warrants, based upon the following management assumptions:

Expected dividends	0%
Expected volatility	286%
Expected term	3 years
Risk free interest rate	4.74%

F-20

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Restated)

In 2007, the Company issued 199,378 warrants as a loan extension fee, having a fair value of $29,126. The terms of the loan were not changed in connection with granting these warrants. These warrants have an exercise price of $0.44/share, and expire in 2010.

The Company determined the fair value of these warrants, based upon the following management assumptions:

Expected dividends	0%
Expected volatility	286%
Expected term	3 years
Risk free interest rate	3.07%

In 2008, the Company issued 199,378 warrants as a loan extension fee, having a fair value of $469,018. The terms of the loan were not changed in connection with granting these warrants. These warrants have an exercise price of $0.44/share, and expire in 2010.

The Company determined the fair value of these warrants, based upon the following management assumptions:

Expected dividends	0%
Expected volatility	286%
Expected term	3 years
Risk free interest rate	1.00%

In 2008, the Company issued 337,936 warrants to a member of management having a fair value of $50,000. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.44/share, and expire in 2018.

The Company determined the fair value of these warrants, based upon the following management assumptions:

Expected dividends	0%
Expected volatility	286%
Expected term	10 years
Risk free interest rate	3.64%

In 2009, the Company issued 1,000,000 warrants to a consultant, having a fair value of $233,380. The warrants have an exercise price of $0.35/share, and expire in 2014.

F-21

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Restated)

The Company determined the fair value of these warrants, based upon the following management assumptions:

Expected dividends	0%
Expected volatility	150%
Expected term	5 years
Risk free interest rate	2.30%

(C)

Warrants

The following is a summary of the Company’s warrant activity:

	Warrants		Weighted Average Exercise Price
Balance - December 31, 2007		8,054,726	$	0.41
Granted		540,139	$	0.44
Exercised		-	$	-
Forfeited/Cancelled		-	$	-
Outstanding – December 31, 2008		8,594,865	$	0.41
Exercisable – December 31, 2008		8,594,865	$	0.41
Granted		3,846,004	$	0.33
Exercised		-	$	-
Forfeited/Cancelled		-	$	-
Outstanding – December 31, 2009		12,440,869	$	0.39
Exercisable – December 31, 2009		12,440,869	$	0.39

Warrants Outstanding					Warrants Exercisable
Range of exercise price	Number Outstanding	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	Weighted Average Exercise Price		Number Exercisable
$0.30 - $0.50	12,440,869	4.32 years	$0.30 - $0.50	12,440,869

At December 31, 2009, the total intrinsic value of warrants outstanding and exercisable was $0 and $0, respectively.

At December 31, 2008, the total intrinsic value of warrants outstanding and exercisable was $2,930,975 and $2,930,975, respectively.

F-22

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Restated)

(D)

Options

During the period from 1999 – 2001, the Company granted 2,250,000 options for services rendered by members of management. The grant date fair value of these option grants was $11,500. These options vested equally over four years beginning on the one year anniversary of the grant. The entire $11,500 was expensed as of June 2004.

In 2005, the Company granted 2,027,614 options for services to be rendered. The options expire 5 years from issuance and have an exercise price of $0.33/share. The grant date fair value of these options was $2,970. These options vested equally over three years beginning on the one year anniversary of the grant.

The Company determined the fair value of these options (from 1999-2001 and 2005), based upon the following management assumptions:

Exercise price Expected dividends	$0.003 - $0.24 0%
Expected volatility	286%
Expected term	3- 5 years
Risk free interest rate	4.25 – 5.74%

In 2009, the Company granted 150,000 options for services to be rendered by a board director. The options expire 5 years from issuance and have an exercise price of $0.22/share. The grant date fair value of these options was $134,160. The options vest 50,000 shares each on September 22, 2010, 2011 and 2012.

The Company determined the fair value of these options, based upon the following management assumptions:

Expected dividends	0%
Expected volatility	286%
Expected term	3 years
Risk free interest rate	1.54%

F-23

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Restated)

The following is a summary of the Company’s options activity:

	Options		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Life
Balance - December 31, 2007		2,027,614	$	0.33	2.84 years
Granted		-	$	-
Exercised		-	$	-
Forfeited/Cancelled		-	$	-
Outstanding – December 31, 2008		2,027,614	$	0.33	1.84 years
Exercisable – December 31, 2008		2,027,614	$	0.33	1.84 years
Granted		150,000	$	0.22
Exercised		-	$	-
Forfeited/Cancelled		-	$	-
Outstanding – December 31, 2009		2,177,614	$	0.32	1.78 years
Exercisable – December 31, 2009		2,027,614	$	0.33	0.84 years

At December 31, 2009, the total intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable was $0 and $0, respectively.

At December 31, 2008, the total intrinsic value of options outstanding and exercisable was $230,886 and $230,886, respectively.

Note 7 Income Taxes

The Company recognized deferred tax assets and liabilities for both the expected impact of differences between the financial statements and the tax basis of assets and liabilities, and for the expected future tax benefit to be derived from tax losses and tax credit carryforwards. The Company will establish a valuation allowance to reflect the likelihood of realization of deferred tax assets.

The Company has a net operating loss carryforward for tax purposes totaling approximately $4,500,000 at December 31, 2009, expiring through 2029. There is a limitation on the amount of taxable income that can be offset by carryforwards after a change in control (generally greater than a 50% change in ownership). Temporary differences, which give rise to a net deferred tax asset, are as follows:

F-24

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Restated)

Significant deferred tax assets at December 31, 2009 and 2008 as follows:

	2009			2008
Gross deferred tax assets:
Net operating loss carryforwards	$	(574,000	)	$	(394,000	)
Total deferred tax assets		574,000			394,000
Less: valuation allowance		(574,000	)		(394,000	)
Net deferred tax asset recorded	$	-		$	-

The valuation allowance at December 31, 2008 was approximately $394,000. The net change in valuation allowance during the year ended December 31, 2009 was an increase of approximately $180,000. In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred income tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred income tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred income tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based on consideration of these items, management has determined that enough uncertainty exists relative to the realization of the deferred income tax asset balances to warrant the application of a full valuation allowance as of December 31, 2009.

The actual tax benefit differs from the expected tax benefit for the years ended December 31, 2009 and 2008(computed by applying the U.S. Federal Corporate tax rate of 34% to income before taxes and 9.8% for State income taxes, a blended rate of 40.67%) as follows:

	2009			2008

Expected tax benefit – Federal	$	(584,000	)	$	(484,000	)
Expected tax benefit – State		(187,000	)		(154,000	)
Derivative Expense		416,000			-
Change in Fair Value of Derivative Liability		(415,000	)		-
Amortization of Debt Discount		105,000			203,000
Amortization of Debt Issue Costs		2,000			4,000
Non-deductible shared based compensation		248,000			20,000
Payroll Taxes, Interest and Penalties		235,000			17,000
Change in Valuation Allowance		180,000			394,000
Actual tax benefit	$	-		$	-

Note 8 Commitments and Contingencies

Litigations, Claims and Assessments

F-25

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Restated)

From time to time, the Company may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm its business. The Company is currently not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that they believe will have, individually or in the aggregate, a material adverse affect on its business, financial condition or operating results. In 2006, the Company accrued a liability of $200,000 in relation to a settlement. The Company is in default under the terms of the settlement, however, the Company believes that the likelihood of a lawsuit is remote, but it is possible, and the financial statements have not been adjusted for this uncertainty.

Expected dividends	0%
Expected volatility	286%
Expected term: conversion feature	5 years
Risk free interest rate	3.33%

The note holders are also entitled to a production bonus from product sales up to $1.25 per each dollar invested. There have been no sales since inception and no accrual for the production bonus.

In 2008, the Company engaged a firm's services to assist in its fundraising endeavors by execution of a non-exclusive agreement. Although this agreement was not formally terminated, the firm ceased to provide services, or evidence of such services, but has asserted that additional Consulting Fees of $15,000,000 are still due and payable. The Company disagrees and will contest this vigorously. Although the Company believes it unlikely, it could become liable for the additional fees.

Note 9 Restatement

In connection with the Company’s reaudit of the 2008 financial statements (issued by our prior auditors, who had their license revoked), the Company discovered material errors associated with the financial statements issued for the year ended December 31, 2008.

The Company adjusted previously issued financial statements to reflect the following in connection with the restatement:

							December 31, 2008
	December 31, 2008						As originally
	(Restated)			Adjustments			reported
Assets

Current Assets:
Cash		692			-			692
Total Current Assets		692			-			692

Furniture and Fixtures		-			(1,351	)		1,351

Patents - net		-			(8,836	)		8,836

Debt issue costs - net		3,750			3,750			-

Total Assets		4,442			(6,437	)		10,879

Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit

Current Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued expenses		907,848			634,996			272,852
Notes payable - net of debt discount		1,015,207			676,911			338,296
Notes payable - related party		270,000			270,000			-
Convertible notes payable		-			-			-
Accrued interest payable		188,067			70,817			117,250
Derivative liabilities - debt and warrants		-			-			-
Total Current Liabilities		2,381,122			1,652,724			728,398

Long Term Liabilities:
Convertible notes payable - net of debt discount		-			(777,500	)		777,500
Total Long Term Liabilities:		-			(777,500	)		777,500

Total Liabilities		2,381,122			875,224			1,505,898

Common stock, $0.0001 par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized,
45,887,936 and 45,000,000 shares issued and outstanding		4,500			(193,840	)		198,340
Additional paid in capital		2,637,260			2,789,320			(152,060	)
Deficit accumulated during the development stage		(5,018,440	)		(3,257,141	)		(1,761,299	)
Subscription receivable		-			(220,000	)		220,000
Total Stockholders' Deficit		(2,376,680	)		(881,661	)		(1,495,019	)

Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit		4,442			(6,437	)		10,879

F-26

Table of Contents

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc.

(A Development Stage Company)

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

December 31, 2009 and 2008 (Restated)

Protectus Medical Devices, Inc. and Subsidiary
(A development stage company)
Consolidated Statements of Operations

	December 31, 2008						December 31, 2008
	(Restated)			Adjustments			As Originally Reported

Operating expenses
General and administrative expenses		826,947			606,283			220,664
Total operating expenses		826,947			606,283			220,664

Loss from operations		(826,947	)		(606,283	)		(220,664	)

Other income (expense)
Interest income		68			-			68
Interest expense		(751,641	)		(694,141	)		(57,500	)
Other income (expense) - net		(751,573	)		(694,141	)		(57,432	)

Net loss	$	(1,578,520	)	$	(1,300,424	)	$	(278,096	)

Net Loss per Common Share - Basic and Diluted	$	(0.04	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.01	)

Weighted Average Number of Common Shares Outstanding		45,000,000			25,166,000			19,834,000

Note 10 Subsequent Events

In 2010, the Company issued 168,968 shares of common stock, in connection with the conversion of debt, having a fair value of $50,000 ($0.30/share). There was no gain or loss on conversion.

In April 2010, the Company received $100,000 as partial funding of a $150,000 note.

F-27

Table of Contents

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

Not Applicable.

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls. Our Chief Executive Officer and ~~Procedures~~Acting Chief Financial and Accounting Officer evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of our fiscal year ended December 31, 2009 pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

~~Disclosure controls~~(b) ~~and~~Management’s ~~procedures~~Report ~~are~~On ~~the~~Internal ~~controls~~Control ~~and~~Over ~~other~~Financial ~~procedures~~Reporting. Our ~~that~~company’s ~~are~~management ~~designed to~~is ~~provide~~responsible ~~reasonable~~for ~~assurance~~establishing ~~that~~and ~~information~~maintaining ~~required~~internal tocontrols beover ~~disclosed~~financial byreporting ~~the issuer~~and indisclosure ~~the~~controls. ~~reports~~Internal ~~that~~Control itOver ~~files~~Financial orReporting ~~submits~~is ~~under~~a ~~the~~process ~~Securities~~designed ~~Exchange Act of 1934~~by, asor ~~amended~~under (the ~~“Exchange~~supervision ~~Act”) is recorded~~of, ~~processed, summarized and reported within~~ the ~~time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission~~Company’s ~~rules~~principal ~~and~~executive ~~forms. Disclosure controls~~ and ~~procedures~~principal ~~include, without~~financial ~~limitation~~officers, ~~controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files~~ or ~~submits under~~persons ~~the~~performing ~~Exchange~~similar ~~Act~~functions, ~~is accumulated~~ and ~~communicated~~effected toby the issuer’s ~~management,~~ ~~including~~board ~~the~~of ~~principal~~directors, ~~executive~~management and ~~principal~~other ~~financial officer~~personnel, or ~~persons~~to ~~performing~~provide ~~similar~~reasonable ~~functions,~~assurance asregarding ~~appropriate,~~the toreliability ~~allow~~of ~~timely decisions~~financial ~~regarding~~reporting ~~required~~and ~~disclosure.~~the ~~Any~~preparation ~~controls~~of ~~and~~financial ~~procedures,~~statements nofor ~~matter how~~external ~~well~~purposes ~~designed~~in ~~and~~accordance ~~operated,~~with ~~can~~generally ~~provide~~accepted ~~only~~accounting ~~reasonable~~principles ~~assurance~~and ~~of achieving~~includes ~~the~~those ~~desired~~policies ~~control~~and ~~objectives.~~procedures that:

We● ~~have carried~~Pertain ~~out~~to ~~an evaluation, under~~ the ~~supervision~~maintenance ~~and with the participation~~ of ~~our~~ ~~Chief~~records ~~Executive~~that ~~Officer~~in ~~and~~reasonable ~~Principal~~detail ~~Financial~~accurately and ~~Accounting~~fairly ~~Officer,~~reflect of the ~~effectiveness~~transactions ~~of our disclosure controls~~ and ~~procedures,~~dispositions ~~as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)~~ of the ~~Exchange~~assets ~~Act as~~ of the ~~end of the fiscal year covered by this annual report.~~issuer;

~~Based~~● on Provide reasonable assurance that ~~evaluation,~~transactions ~~our~~are ~~Chief~~recorded ~~Executive~~as ~~Officer~~necessary ~~and~~to ~~Principal~~permit ~~Financial~~preparation ~~and Accounting~~of ~~Officer~~financial ~~have~~statements ~~concluded~~in ~~that~~accordance ~~the~~with ~~Company’s~~generally ~~disclosure~~accepted ~~controls~~accounting principles, and ~~procedures~~ ~~were~~that ~~effective~~receipts asand expenditures of the ~~end~~issuer ofare ~~the~~being ~~fiscal~~made ~~year~~only ~~covered~~in byaccordance ~~this Annual~~with ~~Report~~authorizations onof ~~Form~~management ~~10-K.~~and directors of the registrant; and

~~(b) Management~~● Provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the issuer’s ~~Annual~~assets ~~Report~~that oncould ~~Internal~~have ~~Control~~a ~~over~~material ~~Financial Reporting~~effect on the financial statements.

~~Management is~~Disclosure ~~responsible~~controls ~~for establishing~~ and ~~maintaining~~procedures ~~adequate~~are ~~internal~~designed ~~control~~to ~~over financial~~ensure ~~reporting,~~that asinformation ~~defined~~required into ~~Securities~~be ~~Exchange~~disclosed ~~Act~~in ~~Rule~~reports ~~13a-15(f). Internal~~filed ~~control~~under ~~over~~the ~~financial~~Securities ~~reporting~~Exchange isAct ~~designed~~of to1934, ~~provide~~as ~~reasonable assurance~~amended, ~~regarding~~is ~~the~~appropriately ~~reliability~~recorded, ofprocessed, ~~financial~~summarized ~~reporting~~ and ~~preparation~~reported ~~of financial~~within ~~statements~~the ~~for~~specified ~~external~~time ~~purposes in accordance with U~~periods.~~S. GAAP.~~

~~Under~~Management ~~the supervision~~has ~~and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Principal Financial and Accounting Officer, we~~ conducted an ~~assessment~~evaluation of the ~~design~~ ~~and~~ effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of ~~the~~ ~~fiscal~~December ~~year~~31, ~~covered~~2009 bybased ~~this report. Based~~ on ~~this~~the ~~assessment,~~framework ~~management concluded~~established ~~that,~~in asInternal ofControl-Integrated ~~December~~Framework ~~31,~~issued ~~2008,~~by the ~~Company’s~~Committee ~~internal~~of ~~control~~Sponsoring ~~over financial~~Organizations ~~reporting~~of ~~was~~the ~~effective~~Treadway Commission (“COSO”).

17Based on this assessment, management concluded that as of December 31, 2009 it had material weaknesses in its internal control procedures.

~~This annual~~A ~~report~~material ~~does~~weakness ~~not~~is ~~include~~a ancontrol ~~attestation~~deficiency, ~~report~~or combination of ~~our~~control ~~company’s~~deficiencies, ~~registered public~~in ~~accounting firm regarding~~ internal control over financial reporting~~. Management’s~~ ~~report~~such ~~was~~that ~~not~~there ~~subject~~is toa ~~attestation~~reasonable bypossibility ~~the~~that ~~company’s~~a ~~registered public~~material ~~accounting~~misstatement ~~firm~~of ~~pursuant~~our toannual ~~temporary~~or ~~rules~~interim offinancial ~~the~~statements ~~SEC~~would ~~that~~not ~~permit~~be ~~the company~~prevented toor ~~provide~~detected ~~only~~on ~~management’s~~a ~~report~~timely ~~in this annual report~~basis.

~~(c) Change~~As inof ~~Internal~~December ~~Control~~31, 2009, we have concluded that our internal control over ~~Financial~~financial ~~Reporting~~reporting was ineffective as of December 31, 2009. The Company’s assessment identified certain material weaknesses which are set forth below:

~~There were no significant changes to our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-~~15~~(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during our fourth fiscal quarter, that could materially affect, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.~~

Financial Statement Close Process

●	There are insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of US GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements.

●	There is a lack of formal process and timeline for closing the books and records at the end of each reporting period.

●	The Company has inadequate design of controls over recording accruals, proper recording and identification of compensation items and the resultant payroll tax liabilities.

These weaknesses restrict the Company’s ability to timely gather, analyze and report information relative to the financial statements.

Entity Level Controls

The Company currently has insufficient resources and an insufficient level of monitoring and oversight, which may restrict the Company’s ability to gather, analyze and report information relative to the financial statements in a timely manner, including insufficient documentation and review of the selection and application of generally accepted accounting principles to significant non-routine transactions. In addition, the limited size of the accounting department makes it impractical to achieve and optimum segregation of duties.

There are limited processes and limited or no documentation in place for the identification and assessment of internal and external risks that would influence the success or failure of the achievement of entity-wide and activity-level objectives.

Functional Controls and Segregation of Duties

There is an inadequate segregation of duties consistent with control objectives. Our company’s management is composed of a small number of individuals resulting in a situation where limitations on segregation of duties exist. In order to remedy this situation we would need to hire additional staff to provide greater segregation of duties. Currently, it is not feasible to hire additional staff to obtain optimal segregation of duties. Management will reassess this matter in the following year to determine whether improvement in segregation of duty is feasible.

Accordingly, as the result of identifying the above material weaknesses we have concluded that these control deficiencies resulted in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the company’s internal controls.

It should be noted that any system of controls, however well-designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the system are met. In addition, the design of any control system is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events. Because of these and other inherent limitations of control systems, there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions.

Management believes that the material weaknesses set forth above were the result of the scale of our operations and are intrinsic to our small size. Management believes these weaknesses did not have a material effect on our financial results and intends to take remedial actions upon receiving funding for the company’s business operations.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report herein.

(c) Changes In Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting. Management believes that preparing and implementing sufficient written policies and checklists will remedy the material weaknesses pertaining to insufficient written policies and procedures for accounting and financial reporting with respect to the requirements and application of US GAAP and SEC disclosure requirements. Further, management believes that the hiring of additional personnel who have the technical expertise and knowledge will result in proper segregation of duties and provide more checks and balances within the department. These personnel will provide the depth of knowledge and time commitment to provide a greater level of review for corporate activities. The appointment of additional outside directors with industry expertise will greatly decrease any control and procedure issues the company may encounter in the future. We will continue to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of our internal controls and procedures and our internal controls over financial reporting on an ongoing basis and are committed to taking further action and implementing additional enhancements or improvements, as necessary and as funds allow. We intend to take appropriate and reasonable steps to make the necessary improvements to remediate these deficiencies, including:

●	We will continue to educate our management personnel to comply with the disclosure requirements of Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Regulation S-K; and

●	We will increase management oversight of accounting and reporting functions in the future.

●	We will document a formal code of ethics.

●

We will revise processes to provide for a greater role of independent board members in the oversight and review until such time that we are adequately capitalized to permit hiring additional personnel to address segregation of duties issues, ineffective controls over the revenue cycle and insufficient supervision and review by our corporate management.

●	We will continue to update the documentation of our internal control processes, including formal risk assessment of our financial reporting processes.

We intend to consider the results of our remediation efforts and related testing as part of our year-end 2010 assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

Table of Contents

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Directors, Executive Officers, Promoters and Control Persons

The following individuals serve as the ~~Directors~~directors and executive officers of our company. All ~~Directors~~directors of our company hold office until the next annual meeting of our shareholders or until their successors have been elected and qualified. The executive officers of our company are appointed by our board of ~~Directors~~ directors and hold office until their death, resignation or removal from office:

Name	Age	Position ~~Held with ourCompany~~
Hadas Yaron	39	President, Treasurer and Director
John S. Salstrom	65	President, Chief Executive Officer, Secretary and Director
Yosef Itamar Krytman	25	Secretary and Director
Jack Dillard	55	Chief Operating Officer and Director
Ronald Ginn	70	Chief Marketing Officer and Director
John D. Olinger	64	Chairman and Chief Intelligence Officer
Michael Sheppard	64	Director

The following issummarizes ~~a brief account of~~ the ~~education~~occupation and business experience ~~during~~for ~~at least the past five years of each director, executive officer and key employee of~~ our ~~company~~officers, ~~indicating the person's principal occupation during that period~~directors, ~~and~~ ~~the~~key ~~name~~employees and ~~principal~~advisory ~~business of the organization in which such occupation and employment were carried out.~~board:

John S. Salstrom, Ph.D., President, CEO, Secretary and Director

Dr. Salstrom is a co-founder of SquareOne. He has over twenty-eight years of experience with start-up companies, mainly in biotechnology and medical technology, and brings a unique ability to analyze and develop strategic plans, business models and optimal corporate structure. Prior to joining SquareOne Medical, Inc., since 1980, Dr. Salstrom served as Head of the Vector Development Program at Molecular Genetics, Inc., Research Director of the Molecular Biology and Human Healthcare Programs at Endotronics, Inc. and he was a Co-Founder and Vice President of Scientific Affairs at Helix BioCore, Inc. He also co-founded and served as Director for Ganesh Energene Ltd. (Mumbai), an Indian Joint Venture. Dr. Salstrom is a Microbiologist and Molecular Biologist by training, having received his B.A. from Miami University, his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Wisconsin, followed by a Postdoctoral fellowship at Harvard University. He holds numerous Academic Honors and Awards, several patents, and has to his credit numerous publications, articles, theses and manuscripts. Dr. Salstrom has held several research and teaching positions.

~~Hadas Yaron~~Table of Contents

MsJack ~~Hadas Yaron is currently working as a freelance consultant for restaurants and is assisting in planning culinary menus. Ms. Yaron worked as a part time assistant in 2008 at Guy Ithaki Project~~Dillard, aChief ~~company~~Operating ~~that~~Officer ~~provides planning~~ and logistical services for individuals and entities who wish to open new restaurants. In 2007, Ms. Yaron completed her Masters of Science degree in Life Sciences at Tel Aviv University with a focus on plant sciences. Between 2003 and 2005 Ms. Yaron was a member of the school management team at the Maritime College in Israel, where she served as Head of the Student Office (a position similar to Dean) with responsibilities for course scheduling and oversight of student academic issues, similar to that of a Dean. During 2002, Ms. Hadas Yaron worked as a customer service representative in the customer service office at Tambor, a large Israeli paint manufacturer. Between 1999 and 2001, Ms. Yaron was the head of a customer services unit at Partner Communications, one of the largest mobile operators in Israel.Director

~~Yosef Itamar~~Mr. ~~Krytman~~Dillard is a co-founder of SquareOne and co-inventor of the SquareOne Safety Syringe technology. Prior to joining SquareOne Medical, since 1984, he was an Executive Vice President and Vice President of Manufacturing for PJD Associates, a company he co-founded, with responsibilities for developing, patenting and bringing to commercial production several electronic monitoring devices for high purity water for drinking and commercial use. As a physicist, he served as a Member of Technical Staff and Project Manager for Hughes Electronics, a Fortune 50 company, where he developed infrared imaging equipment/devices for military and scientific endeavors. Overall, he has an extensive background in the development and marketing of new products. His experience includes development, manufacturing and marketing of semi-conductors, communication and messaging equipment and components. He has years of experience in plastic injection molding/tooling, vacuum forming, metal die-casting/stamping and electronic design/assembly. Mr. Dillard also has wide-ranging knowledge of new product development and management through all phases of prototyping, engineering design/documentation, and full commercial production. He holds several U.S. and International Patents. Mr. Dillard received a presidential appointment to The United States Military Academy at West Point while serving in the U.S. Army in 1973 and he completed his education at San Francisco State University with a B.S. in Physics in 1977.

~~Mr.~~Ronald ~~Yosef Krytman~~Ginn, ~~our~~Chief ~~Secretary~~Marketing ~~and~~Officer ~~Director, joined us on July 2, 2007. Since 2005, he has been employed as a sales executive at the Electronics Center in Jerusalem, Israel. Between 2004~~ and 2005, Mr. Krytman worked as a sales executive at Dag Hameyuhad, a retail food store in Jerusalem, Israel. Mr. Krytman studied at the Chaim Moshe Yeshiva High School in Jerusalem, Israel between the years 2000-2004.Director

~~There~~Mr. ~~are no~~Ginn ~~familial~~is ~~relationships~~a ~~among~~co-founder ~~any~~ of ~~our~~SquareOne. Prior ~~officers~~to ~~or Directors~~joining SquareOne Medical, since 1985, Mr. ~~None~~ ofGinn ~~our~~served ~~Directors~~as orthe ~~officers~~President isand CEO of PJD Associates, a ~~director~~manufacturing inand ~~any other~~marketing ~~reporting~~company ~~companies~~for equipment/devices for the water purification industry. ~~None~~He has over twenty-three years of ~~our~~experience ~~Directors~~in orstrategic ~~officers~~development, ~~has~~planning ~~been affiliated~~and ~~with~~implementation ~~any~~at ~~company~~Continental ~~that~~Can ~~has~~Corporation, ~~filed~~a ~~for~~Fortune ~~bankruptcy~~500 company within the ~~last~~packaging ~~five years. The~~industry, ~~Company~~where ishis ~~not~~career ~~aware~~evolved offrom ~~any~~a ~~proceedings~~senior-level marketing and sales executive to the general management level, which ~~any~~included of operations, marketing and sales responsibility for the ~~Company’s~~Middle ~~officers~~East, orAfrica ~~Directors~~and Greece, oras ~~any~~well ~~associate~~as ofthe ~~any~~United ~~such~~States. He ~~officer~~was ~~or Director~~directly associated with new product development for commercial packaging for pharmaceuticals, iseasy-open abeverage ~~party~~containers, plastic ~~adverse~~tennis toball ~~the~~cans ~~Company~~and orplastic ~~any~~motor oil and paint containers. Mr. Ginn has negotiated, implemented and managed hundreds of sales and purchasing contracts in the ~~Company’s~~U.S., ~~subsidiaries or~~as ~~has~~well as in Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, Greece and Morocco, which included creating a ~~material~~novel ~~interest~~rebate ~~adverse~~program tofor itsecuring orand ~~any~~maintaining long-term contracts. Mr. Ginn received a B.S. in Business Administration and Industrial Management from San Jose State University in 1961 and he is a 1974 graduate of ~~its subsidiaries~~Northwestern Business School.

~~Board Composition~~John D. Olinger, Chairman and Chief Intelligence Officer

~~Our bylaws~~Mr. ~~provide~~Olinger ~~that~~has ~~the~~nearly ~~Board~~thirty-eight years of ~~Directors~~experience ~~shall~~in ~~consist~~top ofmanagement ~~one~~positions. Prior orto ~~more members~~joining SquareOne Medical, Mr. ~~Each~~ ~~Director~~Olinger ofserved as the ~~Company~~President ~~serves~~and CEO of HammerBlow Towing Systems Corp for thirteen (13) years. HammerBlow is a ~~term~~company he acquired and grew to become the industry leader, with multi-plant operations and facilities in three states and Mexico. The remarkable result of ~~one~~Mr. Olinger’s thirteen-year or ~~until~~tenure at HammerBlow and the ~~successor~~decisive isimplementation ~~elected~~of athis strategic plan was the ~~Company's~~sale ~~annual~~of ~~shareholders'~~the ~~meeting and~~company isto ~~qualified~~its largest competitor, ~~subject~~the Cequent Commercial Products division of TriMas Corporation, for eight (8) times its then current EBITDA, after which Cequent retained him for two additional years to ~~removal~~help bymanage a $240 million division of the ~~Company's shareholders~~company. ~~Each~~For ~~officer~~seven ~~serves,~~(7) years prior to his service at HammerBlow, Mr. Olinger was the ~~pleasure~~President and CEO of the ~~Board~~Nanik Division of ~~Directors~~ Apogee Enterprises, a Fortune 500 company, during which time he had responsibility for aoverall ~~term~~operations of ~~one~~the ~~year~~company’s multi-plant facilities in three states and ~~until~~an additional plant in the ~~successor~~Netherlands. Additionally, isMr. ~~elected~~Olinger athas twelve (12) years of experience as a senior hospital executive, having managed all aspects of patient care and operations in two separate hospital systems in Chicago, Illinois and Wausau, Wisconsin. Mr. Olinger served as a Regional Sales Manager covering fifteen (15) states for B.F. Goodrich Chemical Company for three (3) years after obtaining his B.S. degree from Miami University, Oxford, Ohio in 1968. In 1973, he obtained his Masters degree in Business, with Honors, from Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois, with additional majors in Marketing and Hospital Administration. Mr. Olinger is currently the ~~annual~~ ~~meeting~~Chairman of the Board of ~~Directors~~Integrity First Bank in Wausau, Wisconsin, and ishas ~~qualified~~served on numerous boards of businesses, social organizations and charities.

No Committees of the Board of Directors; No Financial Expert

We do not presently have a separately constituted audit committee, compensation committee, nominating committee, executive committee or any other committees of our Board of Directors. Nor do we have an audit committee “financial expert”. As such, our entire Board of Directors acts as our audit committee.

Auditors; Code of Ethics

Our principal registered independent auditor is Alan Weinberg CPA. We do not currently have a Code of Ethics applicable to our principal executive, financial, and accounting officers.

Table of Contents

Michael Sheppard, Director

Mr. Sheppard is Chairman and CEO of Nevada Mining Company, Inc. He has over thirty years of experience in executive positions with companies in various industries, including medical devices, financial services and manufacturing. He was a co-founder of Atkinson Technologies that developed the innovative Mobile IV System. He served as President of New Life Corporation of America and the National Community Foundation, CEO of Kidpower, Inc. and has served on several boards, including the American Cancer Society, the Physicians Resource Council, the United Way and the Family Institute. Mr. Sheppard received a B.S. in Industrial Engineering from Miami University (Ohio) and his MBA from Wright State University.

Employment Agreements

As of the date of this filing, each of our officers and directors has executed an employment agreement containing appropriate confidentiality and non-compete provisions.

Pursuant to the employee, the employee shall be employed on an at-will basis. The employee may terminate the employment relationship contemplated in the Employment Agreement upon a sixty (60) days written notice to SquareOne, and SquareOne may terminate the employment relationship contemplated in the employment agreement upon a sixty (60) days written notice to the employee if the termination is without cause. However, if the termination is for cause, SquareOne has no obligation to provide the employee with a prior written notice.

Subject to the terms and provisions of the employment agreement, during his employment and for a three (3) years period thereafter, the employee shall not use or disclose confidential information for any purposes not authorized by SquareOne. Additionally, pursuant to the employment agreement, the employee agrees that during his employment and for a period of two years thereafter, the employee will not directly or indirectly engage in any commercial activity that is in competition with that of SquareOne, and also agrees that prior to his creation of employment relationship with a new employer, he will inform this new employer of the content of the Employment Agreement and provide this new employer a copy of the Employment Agreement.

Family Relationships

None.

Potential Conflicts of Interest

Since we do not have an audit or compensation committee comprised of independent directors, the functions that would have been performed by such committees are performed by our ~~Directors~~drectors. Thus, there is a potential conflict of interest in that our ~~Directors~~directors and officers have the authority to determine issues concerning management compensation and audit issues that may affect management decisions. We are not aware of any other conflicts of interest with any of our executives or Directors.

Director Independence

We are not subject to listing requirements of any national securities exchange or national securities association and, as a result, we are not at this time required to have our board comprised of a majority of “independent directors.” We doExcept ~~not~~for ~~believe~~Mr. ~~that~~Sheppard, ~~any~~none of our ~~Directors~~current ~~currently~~directors meet the definition of “independent” as promulgated by the rules and regulations of the ~~American Stock Exchange~~NASDAQ.

Table of Contents

No Committees of the Board of Directors; No Financial Expert

We do not presently have a separately constituted audit committee, compensation committee, nominating committee, executive committee or any other committees of our board of directors. Nor do we have an audit committee “financial expert”. As such, our entire board of directors acts as our audit committee.

Auditors; Code of Ethics

Our principal registered independent auditor is Bartolomei & Pucciarelli. We have adopted a Code of Ethics applicable to all directors, officers and employees. The purpose of the Code of Ethics is to promote honest and ethical conduct.

Involvement in Legal Proceedings

No Director, nominee for ~~Director~~director or officer of the Company has appeared as a party during the past five years in any legal proceedings that may bear on his ability or integrity to serve as a ~~Director~~director or officer of the Company.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The ~~particulars~~ offollowing ~~compensation~~table ~~paid~~shows tofor the ~~following~~periods ~~persons during the fiscal period~~ ended December 31, 2009 and 2008, ~~are~~compensation ~~set~~awarded ~~out~~to inor ~~the~~paid ~~summary~~to, ~~compensation~~or ~~table below:~~earned by, our officers and directors.

· our Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer);

Name	Year		Salary ($)		Bonus ($)		Stock Awards ($)		Option Awards ($)		Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation ($)		Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings ($)		All Other Compensation ($)		Total ($)
John Salstrom CEO and CFO		2008		87,360		--		--		--		--		--		--		87,360
(from June 25, 2009)		2009		87,360		--		--		--		--		--		--		87,360
Jack Dillard COO		2008		87,360		--		--		--		--		--		--		87,360
(from June 25, 2009)		2009		87,360		--		--		--		--		--		--		87,360
Ronald Ginn CMO		2008		87,360		--		--		--		--		--		--		87,360
(from June 25, 2009		2009		87,360		--		--		--		--		--		--		87,360
John D Olinger Chairman, CIO		2008		66,000		--		--		*		--		--		--		66,0000
(from June 25, 2009)		2009		66,000		--		--		--		--		--		--		66,0000
Michael Sheppard Director		2008		0		--		--		--		--		--		--

Filing Compare · PROTECTUS MEDICAL DEVICES, INC.