OMB APPROVAL OMB Number: 3235-~~0060 Expires~~0060Expires: March 31, 2006 Estimated average ~~burden~~burdenhours ~~hours~~ per response..2.64

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, DC 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): ~~January~~April 3125, 2005

CORPORATE REALTY INCOME FUND I, L.P.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)
Delaware	0-15796	13-3311993
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)	(Commission File No.)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)
475 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York		10017
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 696-0701
(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

CORPORATE REALTY INCOME FUND I, L.P.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Charter)

Delaware	0-15796	13-3311993

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation)	(Commission File No.)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

475 Fifth Avenue, New York, New York		10017

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (212) 696-0701



(Former Name or Former Address, if Changed Since Last Report)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

o Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) o Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14a-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) o Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

~~o Soliciting~~ Item ~~material~~2.01. Completion ~~pursuant~~of toAcquisition ~~Rule~~or ~~14a-12~~Disposition ~~under~~of ~~the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240~~Assets.~~14a-12)~~

~~o Pre-commencement~~ On ~~communications~~April ~~pursuant~~25, 2005, Registrant sold the land, building and other improvements, leases, rents, security deposits, and other rights and property known as the Tumi Building situated in South Plainfield, New Jersey to ~~Rule~~Vision ~~14a-2~~Systems Group, Inc (b“Purchaser”). There ~~under~~is no material relationship, other than in respect of the ~~Exchange~~sale ~~Act~~of ~~(17~~the ~~CFR~~Tumi ~~240~~Building, between Purchaser and Registrant or any of Registrant’s affiliates, general partners, officers or directors of such general partners, or any associate of such general partners, officers, or directors.~~14d-2(b))~~

~~o Pre-commencement~~ Registrant ~~communications~~owned ~~pursuant~~fee title to ~~Rule~~the ~~13e-4(c)~~Tumi ~~under~~Building and its five acres of underlying land, subject to the ~~Exchange~~lien ~~Act~~of ~~(17~~a ~~CFR~~first ~~240.13e~~mortgage line-4of-credit loan (cthe “Fleet Loan”) from Fleet National Bank (“Fleet”), a Bank of America company. The Tumi Building was built in 1986 and contains approximately 107,900 net rentable square feet.

~~Item~~As 1of April 12, 2005, the property was approximately 85.012% leased, with 45,700 square feet leased to Tumi, Inc. ~~Entry~~ (at a current rent of $16.00 per square foot for an initial term expiring in January 2011) and the remainder at an average current rent of approximately $19.46 per square foot. Such other leases expire in October 2005 (approximately 9,980 square feet), June 2008 (approximately 23,540 square feet), November 2008 (approximately 6,110 square feet), and November 2009 (approximately 6,600 square feet). Registrant also has entered into a ~~Material~~lease ~~Definitive~~through ~~Agreement~~November 2005 with AT&T Wireless PCS, LLC, to permit installation and operation of a cellular telephone tower on the roof of the Tumi Building, at an annual rental of $19,800.

~~Registrant~~On ~~entered~~March ~~into~~9, a1999, ~~Purchase~~Gdynia ~~and~~America ~~Sale~~Line, ~~Agreement~~Inc., ~~dated~~a astenant ofoccupying ~~January~~approximately 2821,650 ~~2005~~square feet (20.3%) in the “Tumi Building ~~Sale~~filed ~~Agreement”)~~for ~~with~~protection ~~Vision~~under ~~Systems~~Chapter ~~Group,~~11 ~~Inc~~of the U.S. ~~(“Purchaser”)~~Bankruptcy toCode. ~~sell~~Polish Ocean Lines, ~~transfer~~a Polish corporation partially owned by the Polish Government, ~~grant~~is jointly and ~~assign~~severally obligated under this lease. On or about April 30, 1999, the ~~land~~lease, ~~building~~with a term expiring in May 2007 and ~~other~~annual ~~improvements~~rental payments of approximately $446,000, ~~leases~~was rejected in the bankruptcy proceeding. In July 2000, ~~rents~~Registrant obtained a judgment in an action in the Superior Court of New Jersey Law Division; Middlesex County against Polish Ocean Lines in the approximate amount of $618,600. On ~~security~~May ~~deposits~~4, ~~and~~2001, ~~other~~the ~~rights~~amount ~~and~~of ~~property~~this ~~known~~judgment aswas ~~the~~increased ~~Tumi~~to ~~Building~~approximately ~~situated~~$4,389,400. Registrant is pursuing enforcement of its judgment in ~~South~~Poland ~~Plainfield~~and on November 29, 2004, the Supreme Court of Poland announced its ruling recognizing enforceability of a New Jersey judgment in Poland. The ~~Agreement~~Polish ~~was~~Supreme ~~fully~~Court ~~executed~~has onsent orthe ~~about~~matter ~~January~~back 31to a lower court to determine enforceability of Registrant’s judgment in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling. Despite this favorable ruling, ~~2005~~there can be no assurance as to Registrant’s ability to collect any of the judgment against Polish Ocean Lines. Approximately 11,130 square feet of this space in the Tumi Building remains vacant. The sale of the Tumi Building did not include Registrant’s judgment against Polish Ocean Lines or any rights Registrant may have or hereafter acquire with respect to its litigation against Polish Ocean Lines.

~~Registrant~~The ~~owns~~sale ~~fee~~price ~~title~~paid toby Purchaser for the Tumi Building ~~and~~was ~~its~~$9,750,000 ~~five~~(the ~~acres~~“Purchase ofPrice”). The ~~underlying~~Purchase ~~land,~~Price ~~subject~~was topaid ~~the~~payable ~~lien~~in ofimmediately aavailable ~~first~~U.S. ~~mortgage~~funds ~~line-of-credit~~at ~~loan (~~the ~~“Fleet~~closing ~~Loan”)~~of ~~from~~the ~~Fleet~~purchase ~~National~~and ~~Bank~~sale (the “~~Fleet~~Closing”). ~~The~~Pursuant ~~Tumi~~to ~~Building~~an ~~was~~amendment ~~built~~to inthe ~~1986~~Purchase and ~~contains~~Sale ~~approximately~~Agreement, ~~107~~Registrant granted Purchaser a credit against the Purchase Price in the amount of $310,~~900~~000, ~~net~~in ~~rentable~~exchange ~~square~~for ~~feet~~which Registrant’s obligation to renovate the building lobby was discharged.

AsAt ~~of January 31, 2005,~~ the ~~property was approximately 85.2% leased~~Closing, ~~with~~Purchaser ~~45,700~~released ~~square~~Registrant ~~feet~~from ~~leased~~and towaived ~~Tumi,~~all ~~Inc.~~claims ~~(as discussed below)~~ and ~~the~~liability ~~remainder~~which atPurchaser anmay ~~average~~have ~~current~~against ~~rent~~Registrant offor ~~approximately~~any ~~$19.46~~structural, ~~per~~physical ~~square~~and ~~foot. Such~~environmental ~~other~~condition ~~leases~~of ~~expire~~the inTumi ~~October~~Building ~~2005~~including, ~~(approximately~~without 9limitation,~~980~~ ~~square~~the ~~feet)~~presence, ~~June~~discovery, ~~2008~~or ~~(approximately~~removal ~~23,540~~of ~~square~~any ~~feet),~~hazardous ~~November~~materials ~~2008~~in, ~~(approximately 6~~at,~~110~~ ~~square feet)~~about, ~~and~~or ~~November~~under ~~2009~~the ~~(approximately~~Tumi ~~6,600 square feet)~~Building.

~~Tumi’s~~Registrant ~~lease~~paid issales ~~for~~commissions ~~45,700~~to ~~square~~third ~~feet~~parties ~~and~~aggregating ~~expires~~$283,200 onin ~~January~~connection ~~31,~~with ~~2011. The~~the ~~lease~~sale ~~requires~~of ~~rent~~the ~~payments~~Tumi ~~equal~~Building to ~~$16~~Purchaser.00 Registrant ~~per~~also ~~square~~paid ~~foot~~operating ~~until~~adjustments, ~~January~~escrow ~~2006~~fees, ~~and~~transfer ~~$17.00~~taxes, ~~per~~and ~~square~~title ~~foot~~charges ~~from~~aggregating ~~February~~approximately ~~2006 to January 2011. The lease includes two 5-year renewal terms~~$171,500 ~~the~~in ~~first~~connection atwith a ~~base~~sale ~~rent~~ of ~~$20.00 per square foot and~~ the ~~second~~Tumi ~~at a then fair market rental~~Building. ~~Tumi~~At isClosing, Registrant also ~~obligated~~paid tooutstanding ~~pay~~real ~~for~~estate ~~its~~taxes ~~electric~~and ~~current~~leasing ~~consumption~~commissions ~~and~~related ~~its~~to ~~proportionate~~the ~~share~~Tumi ~~(42.3%)~~Building of ~~increases~~approximately in$295,300 ~~operating~~and ~~expenses~~$40, ~~taxes~~400, ~~and insurance over base year 1999 levels~~respectively.

~~Registrant~~At ~~also~~Closing, ~~has~~Registrant ~~entered~~paid ~~into~~down athe ~~lease~~Fleet ~~through~~Loan ~~November~~by ~~2005~~$6,517,500 ~~with~~so ~~AT&T Wireless PCS~~that, ~~LLC~~after toall ~~permit~~costs, ~~installation~~expenses, and ~~operation~~payments, ofRegistrant areceived ~~cellular~~net ~~telephone~~proceeds ~~tower~~aggregating onapproximately $2,132,000 from the ~~roof~~sale of the Tumi Building. ~~The~~Registrant ~~lease~~intends ~~provides~~to ~~for~~use ~~annual~~such ~~rental~~proceeds ~~payments~~to ofaugment ~~$19~~working capital,~~800,~~ ~~five~~including ~~automatic~~the ~~five-year~~funding ~~renewal~~of ~~periods~~tenant ~~and~~improvements aat ~~three~~its ~~percent~~properties ~~(3%)~~and ~~increase~~reducing inaccounts ~~rental~~payable ~~payments~~and ataccrued ~~the commencement of each renewal period~~expenses.

OnRegistrant ~~March~~acquired ~~9, 1999, Gdynia America Line, Inc., a tenant occupying approximately 21,650 square feet (20.3%) in~~ the Tumi Building ~~filed~~in ~~for~~December ~~protection~~1986 ~~under~~for ~~Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. Polish Ocean Lines,~~ a ~~Polish~~purchase ~~corporation~~price ~~partially~~of ~~owned~~approximately ~~by the Polish Government~~$16,473,000, isinclusive ~~jointly~~of ~~and~~acquisition ~~severally obligated under this lease~~fees. OnAt orDecember ~~about April 30~~31, ~~1999~~2003, the ~~lease,~~Tumi ~~with~~Building had a ~~term~~book ~~expiring~~value ~~in May 2007 and annual rental payments~~ of approximately $~~446~~8,987,000, ~~was~~net ~~rejected~~of inaccumulated ~~the~~depreciation ~~bankruptcy~~and ~~proceeding. In July 2000, Registrant obtained~~ a ~~judgment~~write-down ~~in an action in the Superior Court~~ of ~~New Jersey Law Division; Middlesex County against Polish Ocean Lines in the approximate amount of~~ $~~618~~2,~~600. On May 4~~635,000 ~~2001, the amount of this judgment was increased~~ to ~~approximately~~reduce ~~$4,389,400. Registrant is pursuing enforcement of its judgment in Poland and on November 29, 2004,~~ the ~~Supreme~~carrying ~~Court~~amount of ~~Poland announced its ruling recognizing enforceability of a New Jersey judgment in Poland. The Polish Supreme Court has sent~~ the ~~matter~~Tumi ~~back~~Building to afair ~~lower~~value ~~court~~at toDecember ~~determine enforceability of Registrant’s judgment in light of the Supreme Court’s ruling. Despite this favorable ruling~~31, ~~there can be no assurance as to Registrant’s ability to collect any of the judgment against Polish Ocean Lines~~2003. ~~Approximately 11,130 square feet of this space in the Tumi Building remains vacant.~~

The sale price to be paid by Purchaser for the Tumi Building is $9,750,000 (the “Purchase Price”). The Purchase Price, plus or minus any closing adjustments, is payable in immediately available U.S. funds at the closing of the purchase and sale (the “Closing”). Purchaser has paid into escrow the sum of $250,000 (the “Downpayment”), which is being held in an interest bearing account, as an earnest money deposit towards the Purchase Price. Closing of the purchase and sale of the Tumi Building will be in escrow through Town Title Agency, LLC (“Escrow Holder”) and the balance of the Purchase Price will be released to Registrant upon recording of the deed or issuance of a title policy by the title company.

Closing adjustments include utilities bills (any deposits remain Registrant’s), collected rents and other payments from tenants (any security deposits held by Registrant will be credited to Purchaser), real estate taxes, escrow and closing fees to Escrow Holder (which will be paid one-half by each of Registrant and Purchaser), and recording fees. Registrant will be responsible for completing a remodeling of the building lobby, even if completion occurs after the date of Closing. The remodeling is expected to cost approximately $160,000, which will be paid for by Registrant.

The sale of the Tumi Building does not include Registrant’s judgment against Polish Ocean Lines or any rights Registrant may have or hereafter acquire with respect to its litigation against Polish Ocean Lines.

By February 2, 2005, Purchaser must order a commitment for title insurance and, within five (5) days of receipt of such commitment, Purchaser must forward to Registrant a copy of such title commitment along with a copy of all recorded documents referred to in the title commitment as exceptions to title. By that date, Registrant must deliver to Purchaser a survey of the Tumi Building. Any exceptions to title will be permitted unless Purchaser renders any objections on or before February 27, 2005. If Registrant fails to remove or satisfy any such objections or cause the title company to issue a title endorsement or “insure over” any such objection within 10 days from the date of any such objections, then the Purchaser may either terminate the Tumi Building Sale Agreement or proceed to Closing and take title subject to any such objections.

The sale of the Tumi Building is subject to Purchaser’s due diligence investigation. Purchaser has until March 14, 2005 (“Due Diligence Period”) to inspect the property and the due diligence documents, and to perform such other due diligence with respect to the Tumi Building as Purchaser reasonably deems necessary. Unless Purchaser notifies Registrant and Escrow Holder, in writing, on or before the final day of the Due Diligence Period, of its election to proceed with the purchase of the Tumi Building, the Tumi Building Sale Agreement will be terminated. The Tumi Building Sale Agreement is also subject to Purchaser obtaining, prior to expiration of the Due Diligence Period, financing on terms acceptable to Purchaser. The closing of the purchase and sale of the Tumi Building will occur within thirty (30) days after the termination of the Due Diligence Period, which period may be extended by not more than 10 days by Registrant or Purchaser.

Upon the Closing, Purchaser will release Registrant from and waive all claims and liability which Purchaser may have against Registrant for any structural, physical and environmental condition of the Tumi Building including, without limitation, the presence, discovery, or removal of any hazardous materials in, at, about, or under the Tumi Building.

Registrant will pay sales commissions to third parties aggregating $292,500 in connection with the sale of the Tumi Building to Purchaser. Registrant must also pay escrow fees, transfer taxes, and other customary closing costs estimated to aggregate $7,500 in connection with a sale of the Tumi Building. Registrant acquired the Tumi Building in December 1986 for a purchase price of approximately $16,473,000, inclusive of acquisition fees. At December 31, 2003, the Tumi Building had a book value estimated at approximately $9,290,000, net of accumulated depreciation and a write-down estimated at approximately $2,332,000 in 2003 to reflect the net sales price of the Tumi Building in accordance with the terms of the Tumi Building Sale Agreement.

Registrant must use the net proceeds from the sale of the Tumi Building to pay down the Fleet Loan by a minimum of $6,517,500. Registrant intends to use the balance of any net proceeds to augment working capital, including the funding of tenant improvements at its properties and reducing accounts payable and accrued expenses.

There is no assurance that Purchaser will approve the due diligence investigation, obtain financing on acceptable terms, or consummate a purchase of the Tumi Building or the final terms of any such transaction.

Item 2.06. Material Impairments.

Registrant’s General Partners, in consultation with the principal accountant to audit Registrant’s financial statements, have concluded that a material impairment to two of Registrant’s properties is required as at December 31, 2003 under generally accepted accounting principles.

Registrant is currently working on completing its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, which will reflect this material charge for impairment. In connection with the preparation of its annual report, and upon the execution on or about January 31, 2005 of ~~the~~a ~~Tumi~~Purchase ~~Building~~and Sale Agreement ~~discussed~~for ~~above~~the insale ~~Item~~of ~~1.01~~the Tumi Building, the General Partners concluded that this material charge is required. In connection with the execution on or about March 29, 2005 of an amendment to the Purchase and Sale Agreement, and the Closing on April 25, 2005, Registrant granted Purchaser a credit against the Purchase Price. As a result, Registrant’s General Partners, in consultation with the principal accountant to audit Registrant’s financial statements, have revised the amount of the impairment charge.

The impaired assets are the following two (2) office buildings: the Directory Building, net leased to Verizon Directories Corp. in Las Colinas, Texas, which was sold by Registrant on October 18, 2004; and the Tumi Building, a multi-tenant facility in South Plainfield, New Jersey, which ~~Registrant~~was ~~agreed~~sold toby ~~sell~~Registrant ~~pursuant~~on toApril ~~the~~25, ~~terms of the Tumi Building Sale Agreement~~2005.

Without an impairment charge, the Directory Building would have had a book value at December 31, 2003 of approximately $17,437,000, net of accumulated depreciation. Registrant realized net sales proceeds of approximately $15,542,000 (after a rent refund, sales commissions, and other closing adjustments and expenses), so the General Partners determined to write-down the Directory Building at December 31, 2003 by an amount estimated at approximately $1,895,000.2

3 Without an impairment charge, the Directory Building would have had a book value at December 31, 2003 of approximately $17,437,000, net of accumulated depreciation. Registrant realized net sales proceeds of approximately $15,542,000 (after a rent refund, sales commissions, and other closing adjustments and expenses), so the General Partners determined to write-down the Directory Building at December 31, 2003 by the amount of $1,895,000. The amount of this impairment write-down has not changed from the amount reported in Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 2005.

Without an impairment charge, the Tumi Building would have had a book value at December 31, 2003 of approximately $11,622,000, net of accumulated depreciation. ~~The~~Registrant ~~General~~realized ~~Partners~~net ~~estimate~~sales ~~that~~proceeds ~~a sale~~ of ~~the Tumi Building pursuant to the terms of the Tumi Building Sale Agreement would generate~~ approximately $98,~~290~~987,000 of(after ~~net~~a ~~sales~~credit ~~proceeds~~granted to ~~Registrant~~Purchaser ~~(after~~against the ~~cost~~Purchase ~~of renovating the building’s lobby~~Price, sales commissions, and other closing adjustments and expenses), so the General Partners determined to write-down the Tumi Building at December 31, 2003 by anthe amount ~~estimated~~of ~~at approximately~~ $2,~~332~~635,000. The amount of this impairment write-down has been increased by $303,000 from the amount reported in Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 2005.

The impairment of the Directory Building ~~did not result in any future cash expenditures by Registrant~~ and the ~~General~~Tumi ~~Partners~~Building dodid not ~~expect~~result toin ~~incur~~ any ~~such~~ future cash expenditures inby ~~connection with the impairment of the Tumi Building~~Registrant.

Item 9.01. Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(c)	Exhibits.

	2.1	Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of January 28, 2005 between Registrant and Vision Systems Group, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to Registrant’s Current Report on Form 8-K dated January 31, 2005.

	2.2	Amendment to Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of March 29, 2005 between Registrant and Vision Systems Group, Inc.

~~2. Purchase and Sale Agreement dated as of January 28, 2005 between Registrant and Vision Systems Group, Inc.~~3

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

	CORPORATE REALTY INCOME FUND I, L.P.
	By:	1345 ~~Realty~~REALTY ~~Corporation~~CORPORATION, Corporate General Partner
	By:	/s/ ROBERT F. GOSSETT, JR.
	Name:	Robert F. Gossett, Jr.
	Title:	President
Dated: February 3, 2005
Dated: April 26, 2005

Filing Compare · CORPORATE REALTY INCOME FUND I L P