UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(X) QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2019

OR ( ) TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number 0-53211

EMERGING CTA PORTFOLIO L.P.


EMERGING CTA PORTFOLIO L.P.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

New York		04-3768983
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

c/o Ceres Managed Futures LLC 522 Fifth Avenue New York, New York 10036
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(855) 672-4468
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

New York		04-3768983
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

c/o Ceres Managed Futures LLC

522 Fifth Avenue

New York, New York 10036

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(855) 672-4468

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:



Title of each class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of each exchange on which registered

N/A	N/A	N/A

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes X No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).

Yes X No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer Accelerated filer Non-accelerated filer X Smaller reporting company Emerging growth company

~~Smaller~~If ~~reporting~~an ~~company Emerging~~emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.__

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes No X

As of ~~July~~October 31, 2019, 2120,~~047~~159.~~7580~~7440 Limited Partnership Class A Redeemable Units were outstanding and 21.2650 Limited Partnership Class Z Redeemable Units were outstanding.

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements.

Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P.

Statements of Financial Condition

	June 30,		December 31,
	September 30, 2019(Unaudited)		December 31, 2018
	2019		2018
	(Unaudited)
Assets:
Investment in the Funds(1), at fair value	$	-	$	10,478,871
Redemptions receivable from the Fund(s)		5,807,972		2,523,092
Redemptions receivable from the Funds		-		2,523,092
Equity in trading account:
Unrestricted cash		1620,~~381~~816,~~174~~188		16,750,928
Restricted cash		23,~~928~~705,~~006~~485		2,756,546
Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts		~~499~~150,~~131~~288		93,633
Total equity in trading account		1924,~~808~~671,~~311~~961		19,601,107
Interest receivable		3634,~~942~~871		32,495
Total assets	$	2524,~~653~~706,~~225~~832	$	32,635,565
Liabilities and Partners’ Capital:
Liabilities:
Accrued expenses:
Ongoing selling agent fees	$	4240,~~241~~695	$	53,716
Management fees		2322,~~785~~975		31,371
General Partner fees		2120,~~245~~444		27,083
Incentive fees		~~13,602~~-		62,039
Professional fees		~~158~~174,~~742~~297		135,521
Redemptions payable to General Partner		22,000		-
Redemptions payable to Limited Partners		488,025		2,467,162
Redemptions payable to Limited Partners		352,643		2,467,162
Total liabilities		746,436		2,776,892
Total liabilities		634,258		2,776,892
Partners’ Capital:
General Partner, Class Z, 269.6640 and 396.6850 Redeemable Units outstanding at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively		263,095		382,416
General Partner, Class Z, 269.6640 and 396.6850 Redeemable Units outstanding at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively		266,136		382,416
Limited Partners, Class A, 21,434.5300 and 25,573.0000 Redeemable Units outstanding at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively		24,735,125		29,455,757
Limited Partners, Class A, 20,382.5290 and 25,573.0000 Redeemable Units outstanding at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively		23,673,273		29,455,757
Limited Partners, Class Z, 21.2650 Redeemable Units outstanding at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018		20,747		20,500
Limited Partners, Class Z, 21.2650 Redeemable Units outstanding at September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018		20,987		20,500
Total partners’ capital (net asset value)		2523,~~018~~960,~~967~~396		29,858,673
Total liabilities and partners’ capital	$	2524,~~653~~706,~~225~~832	$	32,635,565
Net asset value per Redeemable Unit:
Class A	$	1,~~153~~161.9845	$	1,151.83
Class Z	$	~~975~~986.6492	$	964.03

⁽¹⁾ Defined in Note 1.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P.

Condensed Schedule of Investments

~~June~~September 30, 2019

(Unaudited)

	Number of				% of Partners’
	Number of Contracts		Fair Value		% of Partners’ Capital
	Contracts		Fair Value		Capital
Futures Contracts Purchased
Currencies		~~361~~186	$	~~279~~(118,~~218~~105)		1(0.1249)	%
Energy		6048		34(29,~~367~~947)		(0.1411)
Grains		~~134~~48		~~(46~~35,~~085)~~156		(0.~~18)~~15
Indices		~~292~~333		58168,~~820~~393		0.2370
Interest Rates U.S.		~~103~~117		~~138~~17,~~617~~123		0.5507
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		~~148~~345		481,~~692~~077		0.1900	*
Metals		80		64,562		0.26
Livestock		20		24,660		0.10
Softs		115		(6,603)		(0.03)
Metals		59		(116,629)		(0.49)
Total futures contracts purchased				571,588		2.28
Softs		50		(138,735)		(0.58)
Total futures contracts purchased				(157,007)		(0.65)
Futures Contracts Sold
Currencies		16213		~~(11~~20,~~890)~~104		(0.~~05)~~08
Energy		6472		15186,~~838~~540		0.0678
Grains		~~128~~41		28(23,~~696~~198)		(0.1210)
Indices		~~114~~432		~~(38~~44,~~018)~~923		(0.~~15)~~19
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		~~221~~379		(6282,~~032~~716)		(0.2534)
Livestock		13		10,680		0.04
Softs		100		161,642		0.67
Metals		5		(6,083)		(0.02)
Total futures contracts sold				307,295		1.28
Softs		105		(9,648)		(0.04)
Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts			$	150,288		0.63	%
Total futures contracts sold				(72,457)		(0.29)
Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts			$	499,131		1.99	%

^* Due to rounding.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P.

Condensed Schedule of Investments

December 31, 2018

	Number of				% of Partners’
	Number of Contracts		Fair Value		% of Partners’ Capital
	Contracts		Fair Value		Capital
Futures Contracts Purchased
Currencies		212	$	(26,777)		(0.09)	%
Energy		33		(96,130)		(0.32)
Grains		225		(84,112)		(0.28)
Indices		209		78,137		0.26
Interest Rates U.S.		103		106,822		0.36
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		441		224,279		0.75
Livestock		13		5,100		0.02
Metals		15		18,336		0.06
Softs		37		(23,859)		(0.08)
Total futures contracts purchased				201,796		0.68
Futures Contracts Sold
Currencies		104		(4,015)		(0.01)
Energy		32		77,785		0.26
Grains		190		27,075		0.09
Indices		68		8,843		0.03
Interest Rates U.S.		57		(96,641)		(0.33)
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		215		(112,302)		(0.38)
Livestock		11		(1,550)		(0.01)
Metals		4		(483)		(0.00)	*
Softs		111		(6,875)		(0.02)
Total futures contracts sold				(108,163)		(0.37)
Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts			$	93,633		0.31	%
Investment in the Funds
SECOR Master Fund L.P.			$	5,373,355		18.00	%
CMF Harbour Square Master Fund LLC				2,505,301		8.39
CMF AE Capital Master Fund LLC				2,600,215		8.71
Total investment in the Funds			$	10,478,871		35.10	%

* Due to rounding.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P.

Statements of Income and Expenses

(Unaudited)

Three Months EndedJune 30,

Six Months EndedJune 30,

Three Months EndedSeptember 30,

Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,

2019

2018

2019

2018

Investment Income:

Interest income

91110,~~669~~267

5044,~~963~~893

~~188~~298,~~515~~782

~~126~~171,~~293~~186

Interest income allocated from the Funds

~~29,564~~-

97111,~~384~~403

78,975

~~159~~270,~~424~~827

Total investment income

~~121~~110,~~233~~267

~~148~~156,~~347~~296

~~267~~377,~~490~~757

~~285~~442,~~717~~013

Expenses:

Expenses allocated from the Funds

~~36,492~~-

6070,~~207~~609

85,308

98168,~~020~~629

Clearing fees related to direct investments

4658,~~588~~684

4025,~~488~~251

84142,~~279~~963

95120,~~336~~587

Ongoing selling agent fees

~~128~~123,~~345~~467

~~194~~183,~~788~~960

~~272~~395,~~435~~902

~~400~~584,~~622~~582

Management fees

7069,~~982~~560

~~117~~113,~~935~~735

~~155~~224,~~137~~697

~~240~~354,~~300~~035

General Partner fees

6462,~~630~~055

9892,~~162~~853

~~137~~199,~~375~~430

~~201~~294,~~991~~844

Incentive fees

~~(40,866)~~-

(48,436)

Professional fees

7574,~~227~~916

7992,~~815~~789

~~169~~244,~~286~~202

~~160~~253,~~444~~233

Total expenses

~~381~~388,~~398~~682

~~591~~579,~~395~~197

~~855~~1,~~384~~244,066

1,~~196~~775,~~713~~910

Net investment loss

(~~260~~278,~~165~~415)

(~~443~~422,~~048~~901)

(~~587~~866,~~894~~309)

(~~910~~1,~~996~~333,897)

Trading Results:

Net gains (losses) on trading of commodity interests and investment in the Funds:

Net realized gains (losses) on closed contracts

~~537~~787,~~032~~650

~~(615~~390,~~870)~~043

~~(75~~711,~~653)~~997

~~(62~~327,~~647)~~396

Net realized gains (losses) on closed contracts allocated from the Funds

~~(105,664)~~-

~~257~~(234,~~786~~125)

197,738

~~593~~359,~~527~~402

Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on open contracts

~~500~~(348,~~150~~120)

74248,~~536~~298

~~404~~56,~~996~~876

2250,~~184~~482

Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on open contracts allocated from the Funds

~~(8,152)~~-

~~131~~(815,~~203~~673)

47,655

~~648~~(166,~~727~~946)

Total trading results

~~923~~439,~~366~~530

(~~152~~411,~~345~~457)

~~574~~1,~~736~~014,266

1770,~~181,791~~334

Net income (loss)

~~663~~161,~~201~~115

(~~595~~834,~~393~~358)

~~(13~~147,~~158)~~957

~~270~~(563,~~795~~563)

Net income (loss) per Redeemable Unit*:

Class A

307.0747

(1726.3492)

29.1562

7(19.4547)

Class Z

3011.2228

(917.4353)

1122.6189

15(1.8172)

Weighted average Redeemable Units outstanding:

Class A

2221,~~398~~095.~~2390~~0010

3331,~~213~~563.~~4093~~7867

2322,~~631~~786.~~8460~~2310

3433,~~025~~205.~~9480~~2276

Class Z

~~348~~290.~~3020~~9290

469.0740

~~383~~352.~~1260~~3937

~~494~~486.~~6220~~1060

*	Represents the change in net asset value per Redeemable Unit during the period.

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P.

Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital

For the Three and ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~June~~September 30, 2019 and 2018

(Unaudited)

	Class A				Class Z				Total
	Amount		Redeemable Units		Amount		Redeemable Units		Amount		Redeemable Units
Partners’ Capital, December 31, 2017	$	41,246,729		35,490.8260	$	495,883		520.1700	$	41,742,612		36,010.9960
Subscriptions - Limited Partners		50,000		43.3540		-		-		50,000		43.3540
Redemptions - General Partner		-		-		(50,000)		(51.0960)		(50,000)		(51.0960)
Redemptions - Limited Partners		(36,~~780~~479,~~024~~181)		(35,~~234~~558.~~2900~~5340)		-		-		(36,~~780~~479,~~024~~181)		(35,~~234~~558.~~2900~~5340)
Net income (loss)		~~262~~(564,~~090~~046)		-		~~8,705~~483		-		~~270~~(563,~~795~~563)		-
Partners’ Capital, September 30, 2018	$	34,253,502		29,975.6460	$	446,366		469.0740	$	34,699,868		30,444.7200
Partners’ Capital, June 30, 2018	$	37,778,795		32,299.8900	$	454,588		469.0740	$	38,233,383		32,768.9640
Partners’ Capital, March 31, 2018	$	39,846,933		33,570.3870	$	459,012		469.0740	$	40,305,945		34,039.4610
Redemptions - Limited Partners		(2,699,157)		(2,324.2440)		-		-		(2,699,157)		(2,324.2440)
Subscriptions - Limited Partners		50,000		43.3540		-		-		50,000		43.3540
Net income (loss)		(826,136)		-		(8,222)		-		(834,358)		-
Redemptions - Limited Partners		(1,527,169)		(1,313.8510)		-		-		(1,527,169)		(1,313.8510)
Partners’ Capital, September 30, 2018	$	34,253,502		29,975.6460	$	446,366		469.0740	$	34,699,868		30,444.7200
Net income (loss)		(590,969)		-		(4,424)		-		(595,393)		-
Partners’ Capital, June 30, 2018	$	37,778,795		32,299.8900	$	454,588		469.0740	$	38,233,383		32,768.9640
	Class A				Class Z				Total
	Amount		Redeemable Units		Amount		Redeemable Units		Amount		Redeemable Units
Partners’ Capital, December 31, 2018	$	29,455,757		25,573.0000	$	402,916		417.9500	$	29,858,673		25,990.9500
Redemptions - General Partner		-		-		(121,996)		(127.0210)		(121,996)		(127.0210)
Redemptions - Limited Partners		(45,~~704~~924,~~552~~238)		(45,~~138~~190.~~4700~~4710)		-		-		(45,~~704~~924,~~552~~238)		(45,~~138~~190.~~4700~~4710)
Net income (loss)		~~(16~~141,~~080)~~754		-		26,~~922~~203		-		~~(13~~147,~~158)~~957		-
Partners’ Capital, September 30, 2019	$	23,673,273		20,382.5290	$	287,123		290.9290	$	23,960,396		20,673.4580
Partners’ Capital, June 30, 2019	$	24,735,125		21,434.5300	$	283,842		290.9290	$	25,018,967		21,725.4590
Partners’ Capital, March 31, 2019	$	25,849,743		22,999.9160	$	395,139		417.9500	$	26,244,882		23,417.8660
Redemptions - Limited Partners		(1,219,686)		(1,052.0010)		-		-		(1,219,686)		(1,052.0010)
Redemptions - General Partner		-		-		(121,996)		(127.0210)		(121,996)		(127.0210)
Net income (loss)		157,834		-		3,281		-		161,115		-
Redemptions - Limited Partners		(1,767,120)		(1,565.3860)		-		-		(1,767,120)		(1,565.3860)
Partners’ Capital, September 30, 2019	$	23,673,273		20,382.5290	$	287,123		290.9290	$	23,960,396		20,673.4580
Net income (loss)		652,502		-		10,699		-		663,201		-
Partners’ Capital, June 30, 2019	$	24,735,125		21,434.5300	$	283,842		290.9290	$	25,018,967		21,725.4590

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

1.	Organization:

Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P. (the “Partnership”) is a limited partnership that was organized on July 7, 2003 under the partnership laws of the State of New York. The objective of the Partnership is to achieve capital appreciation through the allocation of assets to early-stage commodity trading advisors or established advisors employing early-stage strategies, which engage, directly and indirectly through investment in the Funds (as defined below), in speculative trading of a diversified portfolio of commodity interests, including futures, options on futures, forward, options on forward, spot and swap contracts, cash commodities and any other rights or interests pertaining thereto. The Partnership may also enter into swap and other derivative transactions directly and through its investment in the Funds with the approval of the General Partner (as defined below). The sectors traded include currencies, livestock, energy, grains, metals, indices, softs and United States (“U.S.”) and non-U.S. interest rates. The commodity interests that are traded by the Partnership directly or indirectly through its investment in the Funds are volatile and involve a high degree of market risk. The General Partner may also determine to invest up to all of the Partnership’s assets (directly or indirectly through its investment in the Funds) in ~~United States (“~~U.S.”) Treasury bills and/or money market mutual funds, including money market mutual funds managed by Morgan Stanley or its affiliates.

Between December 1, 2003 (commencement of the offering period) and August 5, 2004, 20,872 units of limited partnership interest (“Redeemable Units”) were sold at $1,000 per Redeemable Unit. The proceeds of the initial offering were held in an escrow account until August 6, 2004, at which time they were remitted to the Partnership for trading. The Partnership privately and continuously offers Redeemable Units to qualified investors. There is no maximum number of Redeemable Units that may be sold by the Partnership.

Ceres Managed Futures LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, acts as the general partner (the “General Partner”) and commodity pool operator of the Partnership and was the trading manager (the “Trading Manager”) of AE Capital Master (as defined below) and Harbour Square Master (as defined below), respectively. The General Partner is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Morgan Stanley Domestic Holdings, Inc. (“MSD Holdings”). MSD Holdings is ultimately owned by Morgan Stanley. Morgan Stanley is a publicly held company whose shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Morgan Stanley is engaged in various financial services and other businesses.

During the reporting periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2019 ~~and~~ and 2018, the Partnership’s/Funds’ commodity broker was Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (“MS&Co.”), a registered futures commission merchant. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMorgan”) was also a foreign exchange ~~forward~~ forward contract counterparty for certain Funds. During prior periods included in this report, the Partnership/Funds deposited a portion of their cash in non-trading bank accounts at JPMorgan.

As of September 1, 2011, the Partnership began offering three classes of limited partnership interests: Class A Redeemable Units, Class D Redeemable Units and Class Z Redeemable Units; each of which will be referred to as a “Class” and collectively referred to as the “Classes.” All Redeemable Units issued prior to September 1, 2011 were deemed “Class A Redeemable Units.” The rights, liabilities, risks, and fees associated with investment in the Class A Redeemable Units were not changed. Class A Redeemable Units and Class D Redeemable Units are available to taxable U.S. individuals and institutions, U.S. tax exempt individuals and institutions and non-U.S. investors. Class Z Redeemable Units are offered to certain employees of Morgan Stanley and its subsidiaries (and their family members). The Class of Redeemable Units that a limited partner of the Partnership receives upon subscription will generally depend upon the amount invested in the Partnership or the status of the limited partner, although the General Partner may determine to offer a particular Class of Redeemable Units to investors at its discretion. Class Z Redeemable Units were first issued on July 1, 2017. As of ~~June~~ September 30, 2019, there were no Redeemable Units outstanding in Class D.

As of ~~June~~September 30, 2019, all trading decisions were made for the Partnership by Independent View BV (“Independent View”) and Katonah Capital Partners Management, LLC (“Katonah”) (each an “Advisor” and, collectively, the “Advisors”). Effective June 30, 2019, SECOR Capital Advisors, LP (“SECOR”) ceased to act as a commodity trading advisor to the Partnership. Effective April 3, 2019, AE Capital PTY Limited (“AE Capital”) ceased to act as a commodity trading advisor to the Partnership. Effective March 31, 2019, Harbour Square Capital Management LLC (“Harbour Square”) ceased to act as a commodity trading advisor to the Partnership. Effective October 1, 2018, the Partnership, the General Partner, The Cambridge Strategy (Asset Management) Limited (“Cambridge”) and Mesirow Financial International UK Limited (“Mesirow”) entered into a novation, assignment and assumption agreement, dated September 28, 2018, pursuant to which Cambridge transferred all of its future rights, obligations, and liabilities under that certain amended and restated management agreement, by and among the General Partner, the Partnership and Cambridge, dated as of October 1, 2013, as amended January 1, 2018 (collectively, the “Initial Advisory Agreement”), to Mesirow. From October 1, 2018 until its termination effective October 31, 2018, Mesirow had undertaken to perform the Initial Advisory Agreement and be bound by its terms in every way as if it were the original party to it in place of Cambridge. Effective March 1, 2018, Launchpad Capital Management, LLC (“Launchpad”) ceased to act as a commodity trading advisor to the Partnership. Effective April 30, 2018, Buttonwood Merchants, LLC (“Buttonwood”) ceased to act as a commodity trading advisor to the Partnership. References herein to the “Advisors” may also

Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

~~References herein to the “Advisors” may also~~ include, as relevant, references to SECOR, AE Capital, Harbour Square, Cambridge, Mesirow, Launchpad and Buttonwood. Each Advisor is allocated a portion of the Partnership’s assets to manage. The Partnership invests the portion of its assets allocated to each of the Advisors either directly, through individually managed accounts, or indirectly, through its investment in the Funds. In addition, the General Partner may allocate the Partnership’s assets to additional non-major trading advisors (i.e. commodity trading advisors allocated less than 10% of the Partnership’s assets). Information about advisors allocated less than 10% of the Partnership’s assets may not be disclosed. The General Partner may also allocate less than 10% of the Partnership’s assets to a new trading advisor or another trading program of a current Advisor. The Advisors are not affiliated with one another, are not affiliated with the General Partner, MS&Co. or JPMorgan, and are not responsible for the organization or operation of the Partnership.

On November 1, 2018, the Partnership allocated a portion of its assets to Katonah, which trades the assets directly pursuant to Katonah’s Laplace Program through a managed account in the Partnership’s name. The General Partner and Katonah have agreed that Katonah will trade the Partnership’s assets allocated to Katonah at a level that is up to 1.5 times the amount of the assets allocated.

On October 1, 2016, the Partnership allocated a portion of its assets to Independent View, which trades the assets directly pursuant to Independent View’s IV Quantitative Futures Fund Program through a managed account in the Partnership’s name. The General Partner and Independent View have agreed that Independent View will trade the Partnership’s assets allocated to Independent View at a level that is up to 1.5 times the amount of the assets allocated.

On September 1, 2017, the Partnership allocated a portion of its assets to Launchpad, which traded the assets directly pursuant to Launchpad’s MJP Commodity Strategy through a managed account in the Partnership’s name. Effective March 1, 2018, Launchpad transferred its rights and obligations under its management agreement with the Partnership and the General Partner to Buttonwood, and Buttonwood entered into a new management agreement with the Partnership and the General Partner pursuant to which Buttonwood assumed Launchpad’s rights and obligations. Prior to Buttonwood’s termination effective April 30, 2018, the assets allocated to it had been traded directly pursuant to its Liquid Commodity Strategy.

The Partnership has, and (prior to their respective terminations) SECOR Master Fund L.P. (“SECOR Master”), CMF AE Capital Master Fund LLC (“AE Capital Master”) and Cambridge Master Fund L.P. (“Cambridge Master”) had, entered into futures brokerage account agreements and foreign exchange brokerage account agreements with MS&Co. Prior to its termination, CMF Harbour Square Master Fund LLC (“Harbour Square Master”) had entered into a futures brokerage account agreement with MS&Co. References herein to “Funds” may also include, as relevant, ~~reference~~ references to SECOR Master, AE Capital Master, Cambridge Master and Harbour Square Master. The Partnership, directly and through its investment in the Funds, pays MS&Co. (or will reimburse MS&Co. if previously paid) its allocable share of all trading fees for the clearing and, where applicable, execution of transactions as well as exchange, user, give-up, floor brokerage and National Futures Association fees (collectively, the “clearing fees”).

Effective July 12, 2017 and prior to their respective terminations, SECOR Master and Cambridge Master each entered into certain agreements with JPMorgan in connection with trading in forward foreign currency contracts on behalf of the referenced Funds and indirectly, the Partnership. These agreements ~~include~~included a foreign exchange and bullion authorization agreement (“FX Agreement”), an International Swap Dealers Association, Inc. master agreement (“Master Agreement”), a schedule to the Master Agreement, a 2016 credit support annex for variation margin to the schedule and an institutional account agreement. In addition to SECOR Master and Cambridge Master, SECOR and Mesirow/Cambridge were parties to the FX Agreements for the Funds to which each acted as advisor. Under each FX Agreement, JPMorgan charged a fee on the aggregate foreign currency transactions entered into on behalf of the respective Fund during a month.

On October 10, 2018, Cambridge, Mesirow, Cambridge Master and JPMorgan entered into an amendment and assignment agreement (the “Assignment Agreement”), effective as of October 1, 2018, to the FX Agreement pursuant to which Cambridge assigned to Mesirow all of its rights, liabilities, duties and obligations under and in respect of the FX Agreement, Mesirow accepted such assignment and assumed all rights, liabilities, duties and obligations under and in respect of the FX Agreement and JPMorgan consented to such assignment and assumption. Pursuant to the Assignment Agreement, all references to Cambridge were replaced by references to Mesirow, and all references to “Investment Manager” were deemed to refer to Mesirow.

On October 10, 2018, Cambridge Master and JPMorgan entered into an amendment (the “ISDA Amendment”), effective as of October 1, 2018, to the schedule to the Master Agreement, dated as of July 12, 2017, between Cambridge Master and JPMorgan. Pursuant to the ISDA Amendment, all references to Cambridge were replaced by references to Mesirow.

Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The Partnership has entered into a selling agreement with Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC, doing business as Morgan Stanley Wealth Management (“Morgan Stanley Wealth Management”) (the “Selling Agreement”). Under the Selling Agreement, the Partnership pays Morgan Stanley Wealth Management a monthly ongoing selling agent fee equal to (i) 2.00% per year of adjusted month-end net assets for Class A Redeemable Units and (ii) 0.75% per year of adjusted month-end net assets for Class D Redeemable Units. Morgan Stanley Wealth Management pays a portion of its ongoing selling agent fees to properly registered or exempted financial advisors who have sold Class A Redeemable Units and Class D Redeemable Units. Class Z Redeemable Units are not subject to an ongoing selling agent fee.

In July 2015, the General Partner delegated certain administrative functions to SS&C Technologies, Inc., a Delaware corporation, currently doing business as SS&C GlobeOp (the “Administrator”). Pursuant to a master services agreement, the Administrator furnishes certain administrative, accounting, regulatory reporting, tax and other services as agreed from time to time. In addition, the Administrator maintains certain books and records of the Partnership. The cost of retaining the Administrator is allocated among the pools operated by the General Partner, including the Partnership.

2.	Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies:

The financial statements and accompanying notes are unaudited but, in the opinion of the General Partner, include all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary for a fair presentation of the Partnership’s financial condition at ~~June~~September 30, 2019 and the results of its operations and changes in partners’ capital for the ~~three~~ three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2019 and 2018. These financial statements present the results of interim periods and do not include all disclosures normally provided in annual financial statements. These financial statements should be ~~read~~ read together with the financial statements and notes included in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Form 10-K”) filed with the Securities ~~and~~ and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) for the year ended December 31, 2018. The December 31, 2018 information has been derived from the audited financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Due to the nature of commodity trading, the results of operations for the interim periods presented should not be considered indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year.

Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements and accompanying notes in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires the General Partner to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, income and expenses, and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities in the financial statements and accompanying notes. As a result, actual results could differ from these estimates, and those differences could be material.

Profit Allocation. The General Partner and each limited partner share in the profits and losses of the Partnership in proportion to the amount of Partnership interest owned by each, except that no limited partner is liable for obligations of the Partnership in excess of its capital contribution and profits, if any, net of distributions or redemptions and losses, if any.

Statement of Cash Flows. The Partnership has not provided a Statement of Cash Flows, as permitted by Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 230, “Statement of Cash Flows.” The Statements of Changes in Partners’ Capital is included herein, and as of and for the periods ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2019 and 2018, the Partnership carried no debt and all of the Partnership’s and the Funds’ investments were carried at fair value and classified as Level 1 or Level 2 measurements.

Partnership’s Investment in the Funds. The Partnership carried its investment in the Funds based on the Partnership’s (1) net contribution to the Funds and (2) its allocated share of the undistributed profits and losses, including realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses), of the Funds.

Partnership’s/Funds’ Derivative Investments. All commodity interests of the Partnership/Funds, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments, are held for trading purposes. The commodity interests are recorded on trade date and open contracts are recorded at fair value (as described in Note 5, “Fair Value Measurements”) at the measurement date. Investments in commodity interests denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rates prevailing at the measurement date. Gains or losses are realized when contracts are liquidated and are determined using the first-in, first-out method. Unrealized gains or losses on open contracts are included as a component of equity in trading account in the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Financial Condition. Net realized gains or losses and net change in unrealized gains or losses are included in the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Income and Expenses.

Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

The Partnership and the Funds do not isolate the portion of the results of operations arising from the effect of changes in foreign exchange rates on investments from fluctuations from changes in market prices of investments held. Such fluctuations are included in total trading results in the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Income and Expenses.

Partnership’s Cash. The Partnership’s restricted cash is equal to the cash portion of assets on deposit to meet margin requirements, as determined by the exchange or counterparty, and required by MS&Co. At ~~June~~September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the amount of cash held for margin requirements was $23,~~928~~705,~~006~~ 485 and $2,756,546, respectively. Cash that is not classified as restricted cash is therefore classified as unrestricted cash. The Partnership’s restricted and unrestricted cash includes cash denominated in foreign currencies of $~~185~~(55,~~787~~032) (~~cost~~proceeds of $~~185~~56,~~443~~099) and $(53,834) (proceeds of $54,680) as of ~~June~~September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

Income Taxes. Income taxes have not been recorded as each partner is individually liable for the taxes, if any, on its share of the Partnership’s income and expenses. The Partnership follows the guidance of ASC 740, “Income Taxes,” which prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in the course of preparing the Partnership’s tax returns to determine whether the tax positions are “more-likely-than-not” of being sustained “when challenged” or “when examined” by the applicable tax authority. Tax positions determined not to meet the more-likely-than-not threshold would be recorded as a tax benefit or liability in the Partnership’s Statements of Financial Condition for the current year. If a tax position does not meet the minimum statutory threshold to avoid the incurring of penalties, an expense for the amount of the statutory penalty and interest, if applicable, shall be recognized in the Statements of Income and Expenses in the period in which the position is claimed or expected to be claimed. The General Partner has concluded that there are no significant uncertain tax positions that would require recognition in the financial statements. The Partnership files U.S. federal and various state and local tax returns. No income tax returns are currently under examination. The 2015 through 2018 tax years remain subject to examination by U.S. federal and most state tax authorities.

Investment Company Status. Effective January 1, 2014, the Partnership adopted Accounting Standards Update 2013-08, “Financial Services — Investment Companies (Topic 946): Amendments to the Scope, Measurement and Disclosure Requirements” and based on the General Partner’s assessment, the Partnership has been deemed to be an investment company since inception. Accordingly, the Partnership follows the investment company accounting and reporting guidance of Topic 946 and reflects its investments at fair value with unrealized gains and losses resulting from changes in fair value reflected in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

Net Income (Loss) Per Redeemable Unit. Net income (loss) per Redeemable Unit is calculated in accordance with ASC 946, “Financial Services – Investment Companies.” See Note 3, “Financial Highlights.”

There have been no material changes with respect to the Partnership’s critical accounting policies as reported in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

3.	Financial Highlights:

Financial highlights for the limited partner Classes as a whole for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2019 and 2018 were as follows:

	Three Months EndedJune 30,												Six Months EndedJune 30,
	Three Months EndedSeptember 30,												Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
	2019						2018						2019						2018
	Class A			Class Z			Class A			Class Z			Class A			Class Z			Class A			Class Z
Per Redeemable Unit Performance (for a unit outstanding throughout the period):*
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses)	$	4120.6058		$	3517.4743		$	(413.0961)		$	(311.32)		$	2647.8437		$	2240.8620		$	3420.0443		$	2816.0471
Net investment loss		(1113.5311)			(56.2515)			(13.2531)			(6.1121)			(2437.6975)			(1117.2531)			(2639.5990)			(1218.2343)
Increase (decrease) for the period		307.0747			3011.2228			(1726.3492)			(917.4353)			29.1562			1122.6189			7(19.4547)			15(1.8172)
Net asset value per Redeemable Unit, beginning of period		1,~~123~~153.9198			~~945~~975.4264			1,~~186~~169.9763			~~978~~969.5512			1,151.83			964.03			1,162.18			953.31
Net asset value per Redeemable Unit, end of period	$	1,~~153~~161.9845		$	~~975~~986.6492		$	1,~~169~~142.6371		$	~~969~~951.1259		$	1,~~153~~161.9845		$	~~975~~986.6492		$	1,~~169~~142.6371		$	~~969~~951.1259
	Three Months EndedJune 30,												Six Months EndedJune 30,
	Three Months EndedSeptember 30,												Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,
	2019						2018						2019						2018
	Class A			Class Z			Class A			Class Z			Class A			Class Z			Class A			Class Z
Ratios to Average Limited Partners’ Capital:**
Net investment loss***		(4.65)	%		(2.5)	%		(4.6)	%		(2.5)	%		(4.65)	%		(2.54)	%		(4.6)	%		(2.6)	%
Operating expenses		6.73	%		4.63	%		6.13	%		4.02	%		6.86	%		4.65	%		6.1	%		4.01	%
Incentive fees		~~(0.2)~~-	%		~~(0.2)~~-	%		-	%		-	%		(0.2)	%		(0.2)	%		-	%		-	%
Total expenses		6.53	%		4.43	%		6.13	%		4.02	%		6.64	%		4.43	%		6.1	%		4.01	%
Total return:
Total return before incentive fees		20.56	%		31.02	%		(12.53)	%		(1.08)	%		0.07	%~~****~~		12.02	%		0(1.67)	%		1(0.72)	%
Incentive fees		~~0.2~~-	%		~~0.2~~-	%		-	%		-	%		0.21	%		0.2	%		-	%		-	%
Total return after incentive fees		20.76	%		31.2	%		(12.53)	%		(1.08)	%		0.28	%		1.2.4	%		0(1.67)	%		1(0.72)	%

Net investment loss per Redeemable Unit is calculated by dividing the interest income less total expenses by the average number of Redeemable Units outstanding during the period. The net realized and unrealized gains (losses) per Redeemable Unit is a balancing amount necessary to reconcile the change in net asset value per Redeemable Unit with the other per unit information.

**	Annualized (except for incentive fees).

***	Interest income less total expenses.

**** Due to rounding.

The above ratios and total return may vary for individual investors based on the timing of capital transactions during the period. Additionally, these ratios are calculated for the limited partner class for the Classes using the limited partners’ share of income, expenses and average partners’ capital of the Partnership and include the income and expenses allocated from the Funds.

Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

4.	Trading Activities:

The Partnership was formed for the purpose of trading contracts in a variety of commodity interests, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments. The results of the Partnership’s trading activities are shown in the Statements of Income and Expenses. The Partnership also invests its assets through a “master/feeder” structure. The Partnership’s pro-rata share of the results of the Funds’ trading activities are shown in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

The futures brokerage account agreements with MS&Co. give the Partnership and gave the Funds, respectively, the legal right to net unrealized gains and losses on open futures and forward contracts in their respective Statements of Financial Condition. The Partnership nets and the Funds netted, for financial reporting purposes, the unrealized gains and losses on open futures and forward contracts in their respective Statements of Financial Condition, as the criteria under ASC 210-20, “Balance Sheet,” have been met.

All of the commodity interests owned by the Partnership are held for trading purposes. All of the commodity interests owned by the Funds ~~were~~are held for trading purposes. The monthly average number of futures contracts traded directly by the Partnership during the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2019 and 2018 were 2,~~213~~508 and 1,~~479~~773, respectively. The monthly average number of of futures contracts traded directly by the Partnership during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2019 and 2018 were 2,~~108~~241 and 1,~~608~~663, respectively. ~~The~~No ~~monthly average number of~~ option contracts were traded directly by the Partnership during the three months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2019 and 2018 ~~were 0 and 157, respectively~~. The monthly average number of option contracts traded directly by the Partnership during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2019 and 2018 were 0 and ~~362~~241, respectively. ~~The monthly~~No ~~average notional value of~~ currency forward contracts ~~traded~~were traded directly by the Partnership during the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2019 and 2018 ~~was $0~~. The monthly average notional value of currency forward contracts traded directly by the Partnership during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2019 and 2018 were $0 and $74,~~020~~680,~~761~~507, respectively.

Trading and transaction fees are based on the number of trades executed by the Advisors and the Partnership’s percentage ownership of each respective Fund.

All clearing fees paid to MS&Co. are borne directly by the Partnership for its direct trading. In addition, clearing fees were borne by the Funds and ~~were~~ allocated to the Funds’ limited partners/members, including the Partnership.

The following tables summarize the gross and net amounts recognized relating to assets and liabilities of the Partnership’s derivatives and their offsetting subject to master netting agreements or similar arrangements as of ~~June~~September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

Gross AmountsOffset in the

AmountsPresented in the

Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statements of Financial Condition

September 30, 2019

GrossAmounts Recognized

Gross Amounts Offset in theStatements ofFinancialCondition

Amounts Presented in the Statements ofFinancialCondition

Gross Amounts Not Offset in theStatements of Financial Condition

June 30, 2019

GrossAmounts Recognized

Statements ofFinancialCondition

FinancialInstruments

Cash CollateralReceived/Pledged*

Net Amount

Financial Instruments

Cash Collateral Received/Pledged*

Net Amount

Assets

Futures

~~848~~949,~~894~~661

(~~349~~799,~~763~~373)

~~499~~150,~~131~~288

Total assets

~~848~~949,~~894~~661

(~~349~~799,~~763~~373)

~~499~~150,~~131~~288

Liabilities

Futures

(~~349~~799,~~763~~373)

~~349~~799,~~763~~373

Total liabilities

(~~349~~799,~~763~~373)

~~349~~799,~~763~~373

Net fair value

~~499~~150,~~131~~288

Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

			Gross AmountsOffset in the		AmountsPresented in the		Gross Amounts Not Offset in the Statements of Financial Condition
December 31, 2018	GrossAmounts Recognized		Gross Amounts Offset in theStatements ofFinancialCondition		Amounts Presented in the Statements ofFinancialCondition		Gross Amounts Not Offset in theStatements of Financial Condition				Net Amount
December 31, 2018	GrossAmounts Recognized		Statements ofFinancialCondition		Statements ofFinancialCondition		FinancialInstruments		Cash CollateralReceived/Pledged*		Net Amount
							Financial Instruments		Cash Collateral Received/Pledged*
Assets
Futures	$	851,529	$	(757,896)	$	93,633	$	-	$	-	$	93,633
Total assets	$	851,529	$	(757,896)	$	93,633	$	-	$	-	$	93,633
Liabilities
Futures	$	(757,896)	$	757,896	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Total liabilities	$	(757,896)	$	757,896	$	-	$	-	$	-	$	-
Net fair value											$	93,633	*

In the event of default by the Partnership, MS&Co., the Partnership’s commodity futures broker and the sole counterparty to the Partnership’s non-exchange-traded contracts, as applicable, has the right to offset the Partnership’s obligation with the Partnership’s cash and/or U.S. Treasury bills held by MS&Co., thereby minimizing MS&Co.’s risk of loss. In certain instances, MS&Co. may not post collateral and as such, in the event of default by MS&Co., the Partnership is exposed to the amount shown in the Statements of Financial Condition. In the case of exchange-traded contracts, the Partnership’s exposure to counterparty risk may be reduced since the exchange’s clearinghouse interposes its credit between buyer and seller and the clearinghouse’s guarantee funds may be available in the event of a default.

The following tables indicate the gross fair values of derivative instruments of futures contracts held directly by the Partnership as separate assets and liabilities as of ~~June~~September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.

	June 30, 2019
Assets	September 30, 2019
Assets
Futures Contracts
Currencies	$	~~301~~29,~~101~~684
Energy		78223,~~059~~555
Grains		3836,~~636~~771
Indices		82294,~~301~~942
Interest Rates U.S.		~~138~~51,~~992~~987
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		6296,~~992~~167
Livestock		1035,~~680~~730
Metals		748,~~831~~044
Softs		61172,~~302~~781
Total unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts		~~848~~949,~~894~~661
Liabilities
Futures Contracts
Currencies		(33127,~~773~~685)
Energy		(2766,~~854~~962)
Grains		(5624,~~025~~813)
Indices		(6181,~~499~~626)
Interest Rates U.S.		(~~375~~34,864)
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		(76177,~~332~~806)
Metals		(16,352)
Livestock		(11,070)
Softs		(77,553)
Metals		(124,673)
Total unrealized depreciation on open futures contracts		(349,763)
Softs		(149,874)
Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts	$	499,131	*
Total unrealized depreciation on open futures contracts		(799,373)
Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts	$	150,288	*

* This amount is in “Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts” in the Statements of Financial Condition.

Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

	December 31, 2018
Assets	December 31, 2018
Assets
Futures Contracts
Currencies	$	117,929
Energy		84,783
Grains		59,786
Indices		188,979
Interest Rates U.S.		110,603
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		239,824
Livestock		6,430
Metals		23,688
Softs		19,507
Total unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts		851,529
Liabilities
Futures Contracts
Currencies		(148,721)
Energy		(103,128)
Grains		(116,823)
Indices		(101,999)
Interest Rates U.S.		(100,422)
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		(127,847)
Livestock		(2,880)
Metals		(5,835)
Softs		(50,241)
Total unrealized depreciation on open futures contracts		(757,896)
Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts	$	93,633	*

This amount is in “Net unrealized appreciation on open futures contracts” in the Statements of Financial Condition.

The following table indicates the trading gains and losses, by market sector, on derivative instruments traded directly by the Partnership for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Three Months EndedJune 30,

Six Months EndedJune 30,

Three Months EndedSeptember 30,

Nine Months EndedSeptember 30,

Sector

2019

2018

2019

2018

Currencies

~~451~~(915,~~982~~087)

~~(223~~203,~~200)~~365

~~142~~(772,~~884~~203)

(~~658~~454,~~126~~761)

Energy

~~(75~~175,~~495)~~781

~~312~~320,~~726~~492

(~~254~~78,~~745~~964)

~~268~~588,~~294~~786

Grains

(~~339~~73,~~517~~697)

~~(195~~74,~~610)~~104

(~~479~~553,~~898~~595)

(~~115~~40,~~042~~938)

Indices

~~(83~~345,~~348)~~243

(84136,~~470~~782)

(~~383~~38,~~332~~089)

~~576~~439,~~187~~405

Interest Rates U.S.

~~676~~474,~~046~~420

2482,~~399~~547

~~959~~1,~~180~~433,600

~~(21~~60,~~976)~~571

Interest Rates Non-U.S.

~~314~~(108,~~482~~602)

(~~260~~108,~~719~~564)

~~400~~291,~~364~~762

36(72,~~419~~145)

Livestock

~~(25~~2,~~370)~~982

(6138,~~830~~540)

(7774,~~380~~398)

(5392,~~910~~450)

Metals

~~258~~516,~~591~~133

~~(61~~293,~~510)~~060

~~230~~747,~~998~~131

~~(93~~199,~~815)~~245

Softs

~~(140~~22,~~189)~~357

8(51,~~880~~341)

(~~208~~186,~~728~~371)

1(49,~~506~~835)

Total

1439,~~037,182~~530

~~(541~~638,~~334)~~341

~~329~~768,~~343~~873

~~(60~~577,~~463)~~878

** This amount is included in “Total trading results” in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

5.	Fair Value Measurements:

Partnership’s and the Funds’ Fair Value Measurements. Fair value is defined as the value that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date under current market conditions. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to fair values derived from unobservable inputs (Level 3). The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety falls shall be determined based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

The fair value of exchange-traded futures, option and forward contracts is determined by the various exchanges, and reflects the settlement price for each contract as of the close of business on the last business day of the reporting period. The fair value of foreign currency forward contracts is extrapolated on a forward basis from the spot prices quoted as of approximately 3:00 P.M. (E.T.) on the last business day of the reporting period from various exchanges. The fair value of non-exchange-traded foreign currency option contracts is calculated by applying an industry standard model application for options valuation of foreign currency options, using as inputs the spot prices, interest rates, and option implied volatilities quoted as of approximately 3:00 P.M. (E.T.) on the last business day of the reporting period. U.S. Treasury bills are valued at the last available bid price received from independent pricing services as of the close of the last business day of the reporting period.

The Partnership and the Funds consider prices for commodity futures, swap and option contracts to be based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1). The values of U.S. Treasury bills, non-exchange-traded forward, swap and certain option contracts for which market quotations are not readily available are priced by pricing services that derive fair values for those assets and liabilities from observable inputs (Level 2). As of ~~June~~September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 and for the periods ended ~~June~~September 30, 2019 and 2018, the Partnership and the Funds did not hold any derivative instruments that were priced at fair value using unobservable inputs through the application of the General Partner’s assumptions and internal valuation pricing models (Level 3).

June 30, 2019	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
September 30, 2019	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
Futures	$	~~848~~949,~~894~~661	$	~~848~~949,~~894~~661	$	-	$	-
Total assets	$	~~848~~949,~~894~~661	$	~~848~~949,~~894~~661	$	-	$	-
Liabilities
Futures	$	~~349~~799,~~763~~373	$	~~349~~799,~~763~~373	$	-	$	-
Total liabilities	$	~~349~~799,~~763~~373	$	~~349~~799,~~763~~373	$	-	$	-
December 31, 2018	Total		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
Futures	$	851,529	$	851,529	$	-	$	-
Total assets	$	851,529	$	851,529	$	-	$	-
Liabilities
Futures	$	757,896	$	757,896	$	-	$	-
Total liabilities	$	757,896	$	757,896	$	-	$	-

6.	Investment in the Funds:

On August 1, 2013, the assets allocated to SECOR for trading were invested in SECOR Master, a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of Delaware. SECOR Master permitted accounts managed by SECOR using a variation of the program traded by SECOR Alpha Master Fund L.P., a proprietary, systematic trading program, to invest together in one trading vehicle. Effective June 30, 2019, the Partnership fully redeemed its investment in SECOR Master.

Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

On February 1, 2017, the Partnership allocated a portion of its assets to AE Capital, which were managed and traded directly by AE Capital pursuant to AE Capital’s AE Systematic FX Fund Program through a trading account in the Partnership’s name from March 1, 2017 until January 31, 2018. Effective February 1, 2018, the assets allocated to AE Capital were transferred into AE Capital Master, a limited liability company organized under the limited liability company laws of the State of Delaware, through which they were managed and traded by AE Capital pursuant to the same strategy until AE Capital’s termination effective April 3, 2019. For the interim period from April 4, 2019 through April 30, 2019, the Partnership’s assets previously allocated to AE Capital were not charged a management fee and was credited with interest income at a rate equal to the monthly average of the 4-~~Week~~week U.S. Treasury bill discount rate. OnEffective April 30, 2019, the Partnership ~~fully~~ fully redeemed its investment in AE Capital Master.

On August 1, 2016, the Partnership allocated a portion of its assets to Harbour Square, which until December 31, 2017 were managed and traded directly by Harbour Square pursuant to Harbour Square’s Discretionary Energy Program through a trading account in the Partnership’s name. Effective January 1, 2018, the assets allocated to Harbour Square were transferred into Harbour Square Master, a limited liability company organized under the limited liability company laws of the State of Delaware, through which they were managed and traded by Harbour Square pursuant to the same strategy until Harbour Square’s termination effective March 31, 2019. Effective March 31, 2019, the Partnership fully redeemed its investment in Harbour Square Master.

On September 1, 2012, the assets allocated to Cambridge for trading were invested in Cambridge Master, a limited partnership organized under the partnership laws of the State of Delaware. From October 1, 2018 until its termination effective October 31, 2018, Mesirow had undertaken to perform the Initial Advisory Agreement and be bound by its terms in every way as if it were the original party to it in place of Cambridge. Effective October 31, 2018, the Partnership fully redeemed its investment in Cambridge Master.

The General Partner is not aware of any other material changes to any of the trading programs discussed above or in Note 1, “Organization” during the fiscal quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2019.

The Funds’ and the Partnership’s trading of futures, forward, swap and option contracts, as applicable, on commodities is done primarily on U.S. and foreign commodity exchanges. The Funds and the Partnership engage in such trading through commodity brokerage accounts maintained with MS&Co.

Generally, a limited partner/member in the Funds withdrew all or part of its capital contribution and undistributed profits, if any, from the Funds as of the end of any month (the “Redemption Date”) after a request ~~had~~has been made to the General Partner/Trading Manager at least three days in advance of the Redemption Date. Such withdrawals were classified as a liability when the limited partner/member elected to redeem and informed the Funds. However, a limited partner/member could have requested a withdrawal as of the end of any day if such request was received by the General Partner/Trading Manager at least three days in advance of the proposed withdrawal day.

Management fees, ongoing selling agent fees, the General Partner fees and incentive fees are charged at the Partnership level. Professional fees were borne by the Funds and allocated to the Partnership, and also charged directly at the Partnership level. Clearing fees were borne by the Funds and allocated to the Funds’ limited partners/members, including the Partnership. Clearing fees are also borne by the Partnership directly.

As of December 31, 2018, the Partnership owned approximately 15.3% of SECOR Master, 31.3% of Harbour Square Master and 13.2% of AE Capital Master. The performance of the Partnership was directly affected by the performance of the Funds. Expenses to investors as a result of investment in the Funds were approximately the same as they would behave been had the ~~Partnership~~ Partnership traded directly and the redemption rights were not affected.

Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Summarized information reflecting the total assets, liabilities and partners’/members’ capital of the Funds is shown in the following tables:

	June 30, 2019
	Total Assets		Total Liabilities		Total Capital
SECOR Master	$	41,824,942	$	41,824,942	$	-
	December 31, 2018
	Total Assets		Total Liabilities		Total Capital
SECOR Master	$	37,347,676	$	2,170,539	$	35,177,137
Harbour Square Master		10,504,910		2,532,233		7,972,677
AE Capital Master		19,758,302		99,954		19,658,348

Summarized information reflecting the net investment income (loss), total trading results and net income (loss) of the Funds is shown in the following tables:

	For the three months ended June 30, 2019
	For the nine months ended September 30, 2019
	Net InvestmentIncome (Loss)		Total TradingResults		Net Income(Loss)
	Net Investment Income (Loss)		Total Trading Results		Net Income (Loss)
SECOR Master	$	(37,085)	$	(606,850)	$	(643,935)
SECOR Master (a)	$	(84,266)	$	2,719,987	$	2,635,721
AE Capital Master (a)		(14,754)		4,772		(9,982)
	For the six months ended June 30, 2019
	Net InvestmentIncome (Loss)		Total TradingResults		Net Income(Loss)
SECOR Master	$	(84,266)	$	2,719,987	$	2,635,721
Harbour Square Master (b)		(14,678)		160,848		146,170
AE Capital Master (c)		71,739		(890,810)		(819,071)
	For the three months ended June 30, 2018
	For the three months ended September 30, 2018
	Net InvestmentIncome (Loss)		Total TradingResults		Net Income(Loss)
SECOR Master	$	(4729,~~605~~321)	$	(1,~~685~~466,~~965~~273)	$	(1,~~638~~495,~~360~~594)
Cambridge Master		99102,~~367~~313		(~~517~~3,~~681~~445,315)		(~~418~~3,~~314~~343,002)
Harbour Square Master		7668,~~151~~750		9(1,~~930~~067,004)		86(998,~~081~~254)
AE Capital Master		5067,~~825~~934		(~~658~~657,~~284~~511)		(~~607~~589,~~459~~577)
	For the six months ended June 30, 2018
	For the nine months ended September 30, 2018
	Net InvestmentIncome (Loss)		Total TradingResults		Net Income(Loss)
SECOR Master	$	(97127,~~706~~027)	$	53,~~252~~786,~~493~~220	$	53,~~154~~659,~~787~~193
Cambridge Master		~~184~~286,~~655~~968		(1,~~492~~952,~~646~~669)		(1,~~677~~665,~~301~~701)
Harbour Square Master		~~141~~210,~~423~~173		~~876~~(190,~~061~~943)		119,~~017,484~~230
AE Capital Master (d)		89,539		(813,757)		(724,218)
AE Capital Master(d)		157,473		(1,471,268)		(1,313,795)

(a) From ~~April~~January 1, 2019 through ~~April~~June 30, 2019, the date the Partnership fully redeemed its investment in ~~AE Capital~~ SECOR Master.

(b) From January 1, 2019 through March 31, 2019, the date the Partnership fully redeemed its investment in Harbour Square Master.

(c) From January 1, 2019 through April 30, 2019, the date the Partnership fully redeemed its investment in AE Capital Master.

(d) From February 1, 2018, ~~commencement~~ ofthe ~~operations~~date ~~for~~the Partnership invested in AE Capital Master, through ~~June~~September 30, 2018.

Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

Summarized information reflecting the Partnership’s investments in and the Partnership’s pro-rata share of the results of operations of the Funds is shown in the following tables:

	June 30, 2019									For the three months ended June 30, 2019
	September 30, 2019							For the nine months ended September 30, 2019
	% of											Expenses		~~Expenses~~						Net		~~Net~~
Funds	Partners’ Capital			Fair Value		~~Fair Value~~		Income (Loss)		~~Income (Loss)~~		Clearing Fees		~~Clearing Fees~~		Professional Fees		~~Professional Fees~~		Income (Loss)		~~Income (Loss)~~		InvestmentObjective		~~Investment Objective~~	~~Redemptions Permitted~~RedemptionsPermitted
SECOR Master		-		%			$ -				$ (89,050)				$ 28,365				$ 2,199				$ (119,614)			Commodity Portfolio	Monthly
SECOR Master (a)		-	%	$	-			$	352,502			$	56,216			$	4,201			$	292,085				Commodity Portfolio			Monthly
AE Capital Master (a)		-		%			-				4,798				3,260				2,668				(1,130)			Commodity Portfolio	Monthly
Harbour Square Master (b)		-	%		-				56,578				3,271				11,879				41,428				Commodity Portfolio			Monthly
Total							$ -				$ (84,252)				$ 31,625				$ 4,867				$ (120,744)
AE Capital Master (c)		-	%		-				(84,712)				5,155				4,586				(94,453)				Commodity Portfolio			Monthly
	June 30, 2019									For the six months ended June 30, 2019
Total				$	-			$	324,368			$	64,642			$	20,666			$	239,060
	% of													Expenses								Net
	December 31, 2018							For the three months ended September 30, 2018
Funds	Partners’ Capital					Fair Value				Income(Loss)				ClearingFees				ProfessionalFees				Income(Loss)				Investment Objective	RedemptionsPermitted
	% of											Expenses								Net
SECOR Master		-		%			$ -				$ 352,502				$ 56,216				$ 4,201				$ 292,085			Commodity Portfolio	Monthly
Funds	Partners’Capital			Fair Value				Income(Loss)				ClearingFees				ProfessionalFees				Income(Loss)				InvestmentObjective			RedemptionsPermitted
Harbour Square Master (b)		-		%			-				56,578				3,271				11,879				41,428			Commodity Portfolio	Monthly
SECOR Master		18.00	%	$	5,373,355			$	(302,235)			$	34,198			$	3,833			$	(340,266)				Commodity Portfolio			Monthly
AE Capital Master (c)		-		%			-				(84,712)				5,155				4,586				(94,453)			Commodity Portfolio	Monthly
Harbour Square Master		8.39	%		2,505,301				(374,255)				14,221				6,865				(395,341)				Commodity Portfolio			Monthly
Total							$ -				$ 324,368				$ 64,642				$ 20,666				$ 239,060
AE Capital Master		8.71	%		2,600,215				(116,901)				6,090				3,716				(126,707)				Commodity Portfolio			Monthly
	December 31, 2018									For the three months ended June 30, 2018
Cambridge Master		-	%		-				(145,004)				981				705				(146,690)				Commodity Portfolio			Monthly
	% of													Expenses								Net
Total				$	10,478,871			$	(938,395)			$	55,490			$	15,119			$	(1,009,004)
Funds	Partners’ Capital					Fair Value				Income(Loss)				ClearingFees				ProfessionalFees				Income(Loss)				Investment Objective	RedemptionsPermitted
	December 31, 2018							For the nine months ended September 30, 2018
SECOR Master		18.00		%			$ 5,373,355				$ 437,947				$ 31,355				$ 3,540				$ 403,052			Commodity Portfolio	Monthly
	% of											Expenses								Net
Harbour Square Master		8.39		%			2,505,301				71,464				8,115				6,930				56,419			Commodity Portfolio	Monthly
Funds	Partners’Capital			Fair Value				Income(Loss)				ClearingFees				ProfessionalFees				Income(Loss)				InvestmentObjective			RedemptionsPermitted
AE Capital Master		8.71		%			2,600,215				(115,930)				5,147				3,340				(124,417)			Commodity Portfolio	Monthly
SECOR Master		18.00	%	$	5,373,355			$	682,713			$	86,574			$	9,914			$	586,225				Commodity Portfolio			Monthly
Cambridge Master		-		%			-				92,892				1,043				737				91,112			Commodity Portfolio	Monthly
Harbour Square Master		8.39	%		2,505,301				63,655				27,372				20,099				16,184				Commodity Portfolio			Monthly
Total							$ 10,478,871				$ 486,373				$ 45,660				$ 14,547				$ 426,166
AE Capital Master (d)		8.71	%		2,600,215				(248,208)				11,748				8,876				(268,832)				Commodity Portfolio			Monthly
	December 31, 2018									For the six months ended June 30, 2018
Cambridge Master		-	%		-				(34,877)				2,382				1,664				(38,923)				Commodity Portfolio			Monthly
	% of													Expenses								Net
Total				$	10,478,871			$	463,283			$	128,076			$	40,553			$	294,654
Funds	Partners’ Capital					Fair Value				Income(Loss)				ClearingFees				ProfessionalFees				Income(Loss)				Investment Objective	RedemptionsPermitted
SECOR Master		18.00		%			$ 5,373,355				$ 984,948				$ 52,376				$ 6,081				$ 926,491			Commodity Portfolio	Monthly
Harbour Square Master		8.39		%			2,505,301				437,910				13,151				13,234				411,525			Commodity Portfolio	Monthly
AE Capital Master (d)		8.71		%			2,600,215				(131,307)				5,658				5,160				(142,125)			Commodity Portfolio	Monthly
Cambridge Master		-		%			-				110,127				1,401				959				107,767			Commodity Portfolio	Monthly
Total							$ 10,478,871				$ 1,401,678				$ 72,586				$ 25,434				$ 1,303,658

(a) From ~~April~~January 1, 2019 through ~~April~~June 30, 2019, the date the Partnership fully redeemed its investment in ~~AE Capital~~ SECOR Master.

(b) From January 1, 2019 through March 31, 2019, the date the Partnership fully redeemed its investment in Harbour Square Master.

(c) From January 1, 2019 through April 30, 2019, the date the Partnership fully redeemed its investment in AE Capital Master.

(d) From February 1, 2018, commencement of operations for AE Capital Master, through ~~June~~September 30, 2018.

Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

7.	Financial Instrument Risks:

In the normal course of business, the Partnership and the Funds are parties to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk, including derivative financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments. These financial instruments may include futures, forwards, options and swaps, whose values are based upon an underlying asset, index, or reference rate, and generally represent future commitments to exchange currencies or cash balances, or to purchase or sell other financial instruments at specific terms at specified future dates, or, in the case of derivative commodity instruments, to have a reasonable possibility to be settled in cash, through physical delivery or with another financial instrument. These instruments may be traded on an exchange, a swap execution facility or over-the-counter (“OTC”). Exchange-traded instruments include futures and certain standardized forward, swap and option contracts. Specific market movements of commodities or futures contracts underlying an option cannot accurately be predicted. The purchaser of an option may lose the entire premium paid for the option. The writer or seller of an option has unlimited risk. Certain swap contracts may also be traded on a swap execution facility or OTC. OTC contracts are negotiated between contracting parties and also include certain forward and option contracts. Each of these instruments is subject to various risks similar to those related to the underlying financial instruments, including market and credit risk. In general, the risks associated with OTC contracts are greater than those associated with exchange-traded instruments because of the greater risk of default by the counterparty to an OTC contract. ~~The~~None ~~General Partner estimates that at any given time approximately 0.0% to 9.0%~~ of the Partnership’s/Funds’ contracts are traded OTC, although contracts may be traded OTC in the future.

Futures Contracts. The Partnership and the Funds trade futures contracts. A futures contract is a firm commitment to buy or sell a specified quantity of investments, currency or a standardized amount of a deliverable grade commodity, at a specified price on a specified future date, unless the contract is closed before the delivery date or if the delivery quantity is something where physical delivery cannot occur (such as the S&P 500 Index), whereby such contract is settled in cash. Payments (“variation margin”) may be made or received by the Partnership and the Funds each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying contracts, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Partnership and the Funds. When the contract is closed, the Partnership and the Funds record a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. Transactions in futures contracts require participants to make both initial margin deposits of cash or other assets and variation margin deposits, through the futures broker, directly with the exchange on which the contracts are traded. Net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) on futures contracts are included in the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Income and Expenses.

Forward Foreign Currency Contracts. Forward foreign currency contracts are those contracts where the Partnership and the Funds agree to receive or deliver a fixed quantity of foreign currency for an agreed upon price on an agreed upon future date. Forward foreign currency contracts are valued daily, and the Partnership’s and Funds’ net equity therein, representing unrealized gain or loss on the contracts as measured by the difference between the forward foreign exchange rates at the dates of entry into the contracts and the forward rates at the reporting date, is included in the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Financial Condition. Net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) on forward foreign currency contracts are recognized in the period in which the contract is closed or the changes occur, respectively, and are included in the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Income and Expenses.

London Metals Exchange Forward Contracts. Metal contracts traded on the London Metals Exchange (“LME”) represent a firm commitment to buy or sell a specified quantity of aluminum, copper, lead, nickel, tin or zinc. LME contracts traded by the Partnership and the Funds are cash settled based on prompt dates published by the LME. Variation margin may be made or received by the Partnership and the Funds each business day, depending on the daily fluctuations in the value of the underlying contracts, and are recorded as unrealized gains or losses by the Partnership and the Funds. A contract is considered offset when all long positions have been matched with a like number of short positions settling on the same prompt date. When the contract is closed at the prompt date, the Partnership and the Funds record a realized gain or loss equal to the difference between the value of the contract at the time it was opened and the value at the time it was closed. Transactions in LME contracts require participants to make both initial margin deposits of cash or other assets and variation margin deposits, through the broker, directly with the LME. Net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) on metal contracts are included in the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Income and Expenses.

Options. The Partnership and the Funds may purchase and write (sell) both exchange-listed and OTC options on commodities or financial instruments. An option is a contract allowing, but not requiring, its holder to buy (call) or sell (put) a specific or standard commodity or financial instrument at a specified price during a specified time period. The option premium is the total price paid or received for the option contract. When the Partnership/Funds write an option, the premium received is recorded as a liability in the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Financial Condition and marked-to-market daily. When the Partnership/Funds purchase an option, the premium paid is recorded as an asset in the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Financial Condition and marked-to-market daily. Net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) on option contracts are included in the Partnership’s/Funds’ Statements of Income and Expenses.

Emerging CTA Portfolio L.P.

Notes to Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

As both a buyer and seller of options, the Partnership/Funds pay or receive a premium at the outset and then bear the risk of unfavorable changes in the price of the contract underlying the option. Written options expose the Partnership/Funds to potentially unlimited liability; for purchased options, the risk of loss is limited to the premiums paid. Certain written put options permit cash settlement and do not require the option holder to own the reference asset. The Partnership/Funds do not consider these contracts to be guarantees.

Market risk is the potential for changes in the value of the financial instruments traded by the Partnership/Funds due to market changes, including interest and foreign exchange rate movements and fluctuations in commodity or security prices. Market risk is directly impacted by the volatility and liquidity in the markets in which the related underlying assets are traded. The Partnership and the Funds are exposed to a market risk equal to the value of futures and forward contracts held and unlimited liability on such contracts sold short.

Credit risk is the possibility that a loss may occur due to the failure of a counterparty to perform according to the terms of a contract. The Partnership’s/Funds’ risk of loss in the event of counterparty default is typically limited to the amounts recognized in the Statements of Financial Condition and is not represented by the contract or notional amounts of the instruments. The Partnership’s/Funds’ risk of loss is reduced through the use of legally enforceable master netting agreements with counterparties that permit the Partnership/Funds to offset unrealized gains and losses and other assets and liabilities with such counterparties upon the occurrence of certain events. The Partnership/Funds have credit risk and concentration risk, as MS&Co. or an MS&Co. affiliate are counterparties or brokers with respect to the Partnership’s/Funds’ assets. For certain OTC contracts traded by Cambridge Master and SECOR Master prior to their respective full redemptions, JPMorgan was the counterparty with respect to those assets. Credit risk with respect to exchange-traded instruments is reduced to the extent that, through MS&Co. or an MS&Co. affiliate, the Partnership’s/Funds’ counterparty is an exchange or clearing organization.

The General Partner/Trading Manager monitors and attempts to mitigate the Partnership’s/Funds’ risk exposure on a daily basis through financial, credit and risk management monitoring systems, and accordingly, believes that it has effective procedures for evaluating and limiting the credit and market risks to which the Partnership/Funds may be subject. These monitoring systems generally allow the General Partner/Trading Manager to statistically analyze actual trading results with risk-adjusted performance indicators and correlation statistics. In addition, online monitoring systems provide account analysis of futures, forward and option contracts by sector, margin requirements, gain and loss transactions and collateral positions.

The majority of these instruments mature within one year of the inception date. However, due to the nature of the Partnership’s/Funds’ business, these instruments may not be held to maturity.

The risk to the limited partners that have purchased Redeemable Units is limited to the amount of their share of the Partnership’s net assets and undistributed profits. The limited liability is a result of the organization of the Partnership as a limited partnership under New York law.

In the ordinary course of business, the Partnership/Funds enter into contracts and agreements that contain various representations and warranties and which provide general indemnifications. The Partnership’s/Funds’ maximum exposure under these arrangements cannot be determined, as this could include future claims that have not yet been made against the Partnership/Funds. The Partnership/ Funds consider the risk of any future obligation relating to these indemnifications to be remote.

8.	Subsequent Events:

The General Partner evaluates events that occur after the balance sheet date but before and up until financial statements are issued. The General Partner has assessed the subsequent events through the date the financial statements were issued and has determined that there were no subsequent events requiring adjustment to or disclosure in the financial statements.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Partnership does not have, nor does it expect to have, any capital assets. The Partnership does not engage in sales of goods or services. Its assets are its (i) investment in the Funds, (ii) redemptions receivable from the ~~Fund(s),~~Funds (iii) equity in trading account, consisting of unrestricted cash, restricted cash, net unrealized appreciation on open ~~futures~~ futures contracts, net unrealized appreciation on open forward contracts, options purchased at fair value and investment in U.S. Treasury bills at fair value, if applicable and (iv) interest receivable. Because of the low margin deposits ~~normally~~ normally required in commodity futures trading, relatively small price movements may result in substantial losses to the Partnership, through its direct investments and investment in the Funds. While substantial losses could lead to a material decrease in liquidity, no such illiquidity occurred in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2019.

The Partnership’s/Funds’ investment in futures, forwards and options may, from time to time, be illiquid. Most U.S. futures exchanges limit fluctuations in prices during a single day by regulations referred to as “daily price fluctuation limits” or “daily limits.” Trades may not be executed at prices beyond the daily limit. If the price for a particular futures or option contract has increased or decreased by an amount equal to the daily limit, positions in that futures or option contract can neither be taken nor liquidated unless traders are willing to effect trades at or within the limit. Futures prices have occasionally moved the daily limit for several consecutive days with little or no trading. These market conditions could prevent the Partnership and/or the Funds from promptly liquidating their futures or option contracts and result in restrictions on redemptions.

There is no limitation on daily price movements in trading forward contracts on foreign currencies. The markets for some world currencies have low trading volume and are illiquid, which may prevent the Partnership and/or the Funds from trading in potentially profitable markets or prevent the Partnership and/or the Funds from promptly liquidating unfavorable positions in such markets, subjecting them to substantial losses. Either of these market conditions could result in restrictions on redemptions. For the periods covered by this report, illiquidity has not materially affected the Partnership’s or the Funds’ assets.

Other than the risks inherent in U.S. Treasury bills, money market mutual fund securities, commodity futures, forwards and other derivatives, the Partnership/Funds know of no trends, demands, commitments, events or uncertainties at the present time that are reasonably likely to result in the Partnership’s or the Funds’ liquidity increasing or decreasing in any material way.

The Partnership’s capital consists of the capital contributions of the partners as increased or decreased by net realized and/or unrealized gains or losses on trading and by expenses, interest income, subscriptions, redemptions of Redeemable Units and distributions of profits, if any.

For the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2019, Partnership capital decreased 1619.28% from $29,858,673 to $2523,~~018~~960,~~967~~396. This decrease was attributable to redemptions of 45,~~138~~190.~~4700~~4710 Class A limited partner Redeemable Units totaling $45,~~704~~924,~~552,~~238 and redemptions of 127.0210 Class Z General Partner Redeemable Units totaling $121,996, ~~and~~which awas ~~net~~partially ~~loss~~offset by net income of $13147,~~158~~957. Future redemptions can impact the amount of funds available for investment in subsequent periods.

Other than as discussed above, there are no known material trends, favorable or unfavorable, that would affect, nor any expected material changes to, the Partnership’s or the Funds’ capital resource arrangements at the present time.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Contractual Obligations

The Partnership does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, nor does it have contractual obligations or commercial commitments to make future payments, that would affect its liquidity or capital resources.

Critical Accounting Policies

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the General Partner to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expense during the reporting periods. The General Partner believes that the estimates utilized in preparing the financial statements are reasonable. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The Partnership’s significant accounting policies are described in detail in Note 2, “Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” of the Financial Statements.

The Partnership and the Funds record all investments at fair value in their financial statements, with changes in fair value reported as a component of net realized gains (losses) and net change in unrealized gains (losses) in the Statements of Income and Expenses.

Results of Operations

During the Partnership’s ~~second~~third quarter of 2019, the net asset value per Class A Redeemable Unit increased 20.76% from $1,~~123~~153.9198 to $1,~~153~~161.9845, as compared to a decrease of 12.53% in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2018. During the Partnership’s ~~second~~third quarter of 2019 the net asset value per Class Z Redeemable Unit increased 31.2% from $~~945~~975.4264 to $~~975~~986.6492, as compared to a a decrease of 1.08% in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2018. The Partnership experienced a net trading gain before fees and expenses in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2019 of $~~923~~439,~~366~~530. Gains were primarily attributable to the Partnership’s~~/Funds’~~ trading of commodity futures in ~~currencies~~energy, indices, U.S. ~~and non-U.S.~~ interest rates, ~~and~~livestock, metals and softs and were partially offset by losses in ~~energy~~currencies, grains, ~~livestock~~ and ~~softs~~non-U.S. interest rates. The Partnership experienced a net trading loss ~~before~~ before fees and expenses in the ~~second~~third quarter of 2018 of $~~152~~411,~~345~~457. Losses were primarily attributable to the Partnership’s/Funds’ trading of commodity futures in currencies, ~~grains~~energy, ~~indices~~grains, ~~U.S. and~~ non-U.S. interest rates, ~~livestock~~softs and ~~metals~~indices and were partially offset by gains in ~~energy~~U.S. interest rates, livestock and ~~softs~~metals.

The most notable gains were recorded within the metals complex during ~~May~~July and ~~June~~August from long ~~positions~~precious ~~in non-U.S.~~metals ~~and U.S. fixed income~~ futures positions as prices rose ~~amid~~due ~~safe~~to flight-~~haven~~to-safety flows ~~demand~~amid ~~and~~heightened ~~increased~~global ~~speculation~~uncertainty. ~~that~~Within the ~~U.S.~~global ~~Federal Reserve will cut~~ interest ~~rates.~~rate ~~Within the currency markets~~sector, gains were achieved ~~throughout~~ ~~much~~during ofAugust ~~the quarter~~ from ~~short~~long positions in ~~European currencies versus the~~ U.S. ~~dollar~~and asEuropean ~~the~~fixed ~~relative~~income ~~value~~futures ofas ~~European~~prices ~~currencies~~benefited ~~generally~~from ~~moved~~mounting ~~lower~~global ongrowth ~~weaker-than-expected~~concerns, ~~economic~~escalating fears ~~reports~~over ~~and~~a ~~the~~“hard” ~~expectation~~United ofKingdom ~~looser~~departure ~~monetary policy.~~from ~~Further gains in~~ the ~~currencies~~European ~~were~~Union, ~~experienced~~and ~~during~~ongoing ~~June~~uncertainty ~~from~~over ~~positions in~~ the ~~Canadian~~U.S.-Chinese ~~dollar~~trade war. ~~Within~~In the ~~metals~~global stock index sector, gains were ~~experienced~~achieved primarily during ~~June~~July from ~~long~~short positions in ~~precious~~European equity ~~metals~~index futures as prices ~~rose~~decreased ~~amid~~on ~~U.S.~~disappointing ~~dollar weakness~~economic ~~and as new U~~data.S. ~~sanctions~~Gains onwere ~~Iran~~experienced ~~added~~within ~~to uncertainty in~~ the ~~global~~energy ~~markets.~~complex ~~Within the global stock indices, gains were recorded~~ during ~~April~~September ~~and June~~ from long ~~European,~~futures ~~U.S.,~~positions ~~and~~in ~~Asian~~crude ~~equity~~oil ~~index~~and ~~futures~~oil ~~positions~~distillates as ~~prices~~the ~~increased on~~petroleum ~~signs~~complex ~~that~~spiked ~~major~~higher ~~central~~following rebel ~~banks~~attacks ~~are~~on ~~prepared~~a toSaudi ~~provide~~Arabian ~~new~~oil ~~stimulus~~field toand ~~slowing~~processing ~~economies~~facility. The Partnership’s overall trading gains for the quarter were partially offset by trading losses in the ~~agricultural~~currency ~~complex~~markets ~~during May and June~~ from short ~~futures~~U.S. dollar positions inas the ~~grain~~relative ~~markets~~value of asthe ~~prices~~dollar ~~rose~~strengthened ~~after~~on ~~excessive~~fears ~~rains~~of ina ~~the~~growing ~~U.S.~~global ~~Midwest reduced yield projections~~recession. ~~Losses~~Smaller losses in the ~~energy~~agricultural complex were recorded during ~~May~~July ~~from~~and ~~long~~August ~~positions~~from inlive ~~Brent~~cattle ~~crude oil~~ and ~~refined~~grains ~~oil products as prices reversed lower on an outlook for weakening fuel demand~~positions.

During the Partnership’s ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2019, the net asset value per Class A Redeemable Unit increased 0.28% from $1,151.83 to $1,~~153~~161.9845 as compared to ana ~~increase~~decrease of 01.67% in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2018. During the Partnership’s ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2019, the net asset value per Class Z Redeemable Unit increased 1.2.4% from $964.03 to $~~975~~986.6492, as compared to ana ~~increase~~decrease of 10.72% in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2018. The Partnership experienced a net trading gain before fees and expenses in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2019 of $~~574~~1,~~736~~014,266. Gains were primarily attributable to the Partnership’s/Funds’ trading of commodity futures in ~~currencies~~indices, U.S. and non-U.S. interest rates and metals and were partially offset by losses in currencies, energy, grains, ~~indices,~~ livestock and softs. The Partnership experienced a net trading gain before fees and expenses in the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2018 of $1770,~~181,791~~334. Gains were primarily attributable to the Partnership’s/Funds’ trading of commodity futures in energy, ~~indices,~~ U.S. interest rates, metals and ~~softs~~indices and were partially offset by losses in currencies, grains, non-U.S. interest rates, livestock and ~~metals~~ softs.

The most significant gains were achieved within the global interest rates sector during January, March, May, June, and ~~June~~August from long positions in non-U.S. and U.S. fixed income futures as prices rose as economic concerns pushed central banks to looser monetary policy globally. Within the ~~currency~~metals ~~markets~~sector, gains were primarily ~~achieved~~experienced ~~throughout~~during ~~much~~June ofthrough ~~the~~August ~~second quarter~~ from ~~short~~long ~~positions~~precious inmetals ~~European~~futures ~~currencies~~positions ~~versus the U.S. dollar~~ as ~~the~~prices ~~relative~~rose ~~value~~due ofto ~~European currencies generally moved lower on weaker~~flight-~~than~~to-~~expected~~safety ~~economic~~flows ~~reports~~amid ~~and~~heightened the expectation of looser monetary policy. Gains were also recorded within the currency markets during January from long positions in the New Zealand and Australian dollar versus the U.S. dollar as theglobal ~~prolonged partial shutdown of the U~~uncertainty.S. ~~Federal~~Within ~~government pulled~~ the ~~U.S.~~global ~~dollar~~stock ~~lower.~~indices, ~~Further~~ gains ~~in the currencies~~ were ~~experienced~~recorded during April, June, ~~from positions in the Canadian dollar. Within the metals sector~~July, ~~gains~~and ~~were~~August ~~primarily experienced during June~~ from long ~~precious~~European, ~~metals futures positions as prices rose amid~~ U.S., ~~dollar weakness~~ and asAsian ~~new~~equity ~~U.S.~~index ~~sanctions~~futures onpositions ~~Iran~~as ~~added~~prices ~~to uncertainty in the global markets~~increased. A portion of the Partnership’s gains for the first nine ~~six~~ months of the year was offset by trading losses with the ~~agriculturals~~agricultural complex during the first quarter from long and short lean hog futures positons as prices gyrated amid news surrounding U.S.-Chinese trade negotiations and the African swine flu. Additional losses were incurred in the agriculturals during May and June from short futures positions in the grain markets as prices rose after excessive rains in the U.S. Midwest reduced yield projections. ~~Losses~~Smaller losses in the ~~energy complex~~ agriculturals were recorded during ~~January~~ ~~from~~July ~~short~~and ~~crude~~August ~~oil~~from ~~futures~~live ~~positions~~cattle ~~as sanctions on Venezuelan oil exports~~ and ~~OPEC’s~~grains ~~announcement~~positions. ofWithin ~~new~~the ~~production~~currency ~~cuts pushed prices higher. Additionally~~sector, losses were ~~experienced~~recorded ~~within the energies~~ during ~~March~~February and ~~May~~March from ~~futures~~ ~~positioning~~long positions in ~~crude~~the ~~oil~~Australian ~~and~~dollar ~~oil~~versus ~~distillates~~the U.S. ~~Losses~~dollar ~~within~~as the ~~global~~value ~~stock~~of ~~indices~~Australian currency ~~sector~~fell amid lower-than-expected economic forecasts. Additional losses were incurred ~~during~~in ~~March~~the ~~from~~currencies ~~short~~during ~~futures~~the ~~positions~~third inquarter ~~European~~from ~~and~~short U.S. ~~equity~~dollar ~~indices~~positions as ~~prices~~the ~~benefited~~relative ~~from~~value ~~dovish~~of ~~central~~the ~~bank~~dollar ~~actions~~strengthened ~~and optimism~~on ~~surrounding~~fears ~~U.S.-China~~of ~~trade~~a ~~negotiations~~growing global recession. ~~Within~~Losses ~~this~~in ~~same~~the ~~sector,~~energy ~~losses~~complex were ~~experienced~~recorded during ~~May~~January from ~~long~~short crude oil futures positions inas ~~European,~~sanctions ~~U.S.,~~on Venezuelan oil exports and ~~Asian~~OPEC’s ~~equity~~announcement ~~index~~of ~~futures~~new asproduction cuts pushed prices ~~fell~~higher. ~~due~~Additionally, tolosses ~~escalating~~were also ~~global~~experienced ~~trade~~within ~~tensions~~the ~~and~~energies ~~economic growth~~during ~~concerns~~March, May, and July.

Commodity markets are highly volatile. Broad price fluctuations and rapid inflation increase the risks involved in commodity trading, but also increase the possibility of profit. The profitability of the Partnership/Funds depends on the existence of major price trends and the ability of the Advisors to correctly identify those price trends. Price trends are influenced by, among other things, changing supply and demand relationships, weather, governmental, agricultural, commercial and trade programs and policies, national and international political and economic events, and changes in interest rates. To the extent that market trends exist and the Advisors are able to identify them, the Partnership expects to increase capital through operations.

~~Interest~~21 income on 100% of the average daily equity maintained in cash in the Partnership’s (or the Partnership’s allocable portion of a Fund’s) brokerage account at MS&Co. during each month is earned at the monthly average of the 4-week U.S. Treasury bill discount rate. For the avoidance of doubt, the Partnership/Funds will not receive interest on amounts in the futures brokerage account that are committed to margin. Any interest earned on the Partnership’s and/or each Fund’s account in excess of the amounts described above, if any, will be retained by MS&Co. and/or shared with the General Partner. All interest earned on U.S. Treasury bills and money market mutual fund securities will be retained by the Partnership and/or the Funds, as applicable. Any interest income earned on collateral or excess cash deposited by certain of the Funds and held by JPMorgan in its capacity as such Funds’ forward foreign currency counterparty was retained by such Funds, and the Partnership received its allocable portion of such interest from the applicable Fund. Interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 decreased by $27,114 and $18,227, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2018. The decrease in interest income was primarily due to lower average daily equity during the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2018. Interest earned by the Partnership will increase the net asset value of the Partnership. The amount of interest income earned by the Partnership was dependent upon (1) the average daily equity maintained in cash in the Partnership’s and/or the applicable Fund’s accounts, (2) the amount of U.S. Treasury bills and/or money market mutual fund securities held by the Partnership and/or the Funds and (3) interest rates over which none of the Partnership, the Funds, MS&Co. or JPMorgan had control.

Interest income on 100% of the average daily equity maintained in cash in the Partnership’s (or the Partnership’s allocable portion of a Fund’s) brokerage account at MS&Co. during each month is earned at the monthly average of the 4-week U.S. Treasury bill discount rate. For the avoidance of doubt, the Partnership/Funds will not receive interest on amounts in the futures brokerage account that are committed to margin. Any interest earned on the Partnership’s and/or each Fund’s account in excess of the amounts described above, if any, will be retained by MS&Co. and/or shared with the General Partner. All interest earned on U.S. Treasury bills and money market mutual fund securities will be retained by the Partnership and/or the Funds, as applicable. Any interest income earned on collateral or excess cash deposited by certain of the Funds and held by JPMorgan in its capacity as such Funds’ forward foreign currency counterparty was retained by such Funds, and the Partnership received its allocable portion of such interest from the applicable Fund. Interest income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 decreased by $46,029 and $64,256, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2018. The decrease in interest income was primarily due to lower average daily equity during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2019 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2018. Interest earned by the Partnership will increase the net asset value of the Partnership. The amount of interest income earned by the Partnership is dependent upon (1) the average daily equity maintained in cash in the Partnership’s and/or the applicable Fund’s accounts, (2) the amount of U.S. Treasury bills and/or money market mutual fund securities held by the Partnership and/or the Funds and (3) interest rates over which none of the Partnership, the Funds, MS&Co. or JPMorgan has control.

Certain clearing fees are based on the number of trades executed by the Advisors for the Partnership/Funds. Accordingly, they must be compared in relation to the number of trades executed during the period. Clearing fees related to direct investments for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2019 increased by $633,~~100~~433 and ~~decreased by~~ $1122,~~057~~376, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2018. The change in these clearing fees was primarily due to an increase in the number of direct trades made by the Partnership during the three ~~months~~ ~~ended June 30, 2019~~ and anine ~~decrease in the number of direct trades made by the Partnership during the six~~ months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2019 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2018.

Ongoing selling agent fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership’s adjusted net asset value of Class A Redeemable Units as of the end of each month and are affected by trading performance, subscriptions and redemptions. Accordingly, they must be compared in relation to the fluctuations in monthly net asset values. Ongoing selling agent fees for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2019 decreased by $6660,~~443~~493 and $~~128~~188,~~187~~680, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2018. The decrease in ongoing selling agent fees was due to lower average net assets attributable to Class A Redeemable Units during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2019 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2018.

Management fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership’s adjusted net assets per Class as of the last day of each month and are affected by trading performance, subscriptions and redemptions. Accordingly, they must be compared in relation to the fluctuations in monthly net asset values. Management fees for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2019 decreased by $4644,~~953~~175 and $85129,~~163~~338, respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2018. The decrease in management fees was due to lower average net assets per Class during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~ September 30, 2019 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2018.

General Partner fees are paid to the General Partner for administering the business and affairs of the Partnership including, among other things, (i) selecting, appointing and terminating the Partnership’s commodity trading advisors, (ii) allocating and reallocating the Partnership’s assets among the commodity trading advisors and (iii) monitoring the activities of the commodity trading advisors. These fees are calculated as a percentage of the Partnership’s adjusted net assets per Class as of the last day of each month and are affected by trading performance, subscriptions and redemptions. Accordingly, they must be compared in relation to the fluctuations in monthly net asset values. General Partner fees for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2019 decreased by $3330,~~532~~798 and $6495,~~616,~~414 respectively, as compared to the corresponding periods in 2018. The decrease in General Partner fees was due to lower average net assets per Class during the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2019 as compared to the corresponding periods in 2018.

22Incentive fees paid by the Partnership to the Advisors are based on the new trading profits generated by each Advisor at the end of the quarter, half year or year, as applicable, as defined in the respective management agreements among the Partnership, the General Partner and each Advisor. Trading performance for the three months ended September 30, 2019 did not result in any incentive fees. Trading performance for the nine months ended September 30, 2019 resulted in a reversal of incentive fees of $48,436. Trading performance for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2018 did not result in any incentive fees. To the extent an Advisor incurs a loss for the Partnership, the Advisor will not be paid incentive fees until such Advisor recovers any net loss incurred by the Advisor and earns additional new trading profits for the Partnership.

~~Incentive~~The ~~fees~~General ~~paid~~Partner byis ~~the Partnership to the Advisors are based on the new~~also ~~trading~~paid ~~profits~~an ~~generated~~incentive byfee ~~each~~payable ~~Advisor~~annually atequal ~~the~~to ~~end~~5% of the ~~quarter,~~Partnership’s ~~half~~overall ~~year~~New orTrading ~~year~~Profits, as ~~applicable, as~~ defined in the ~~respective~~Partnership’s ~~management~~limited ~~agreements~~partnership ~~among the Partnership~~agreement, ~~the~~earned ~~General~~in ~~Partner and~~ each ~~Advisor~~calendar year. Trading performance for the three and ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2019 ~~resulted in reversals of incentive fees of $40,866~~ and ~~$48,436, respectively. Trading performance for the three and six months ended June 30,~~ 2018 did not result in any ~~incentive~~General ~~fees.~~Partner ~~To the extent an Advisor incurs a loss for the Partnership, the Advisor will not be paid~~ incentive fees ~~until such Advisor recovers any net loss incurred by the Advisor and earns additional new trading profits for the Partnership~~.

The General Partner is also paid an incentive fee payable annually equal to 5% of the Partnership’s overall New Trading Profits, as defined in the Partnership’s limited partnership agreement, earned in each calendar year. Trading performance for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 did not result in any General Partner incentive fees.

In allocating the assets of the Partnership among the Advisors, the General Partner considers, among other factors, the background of the Advisors’ principals, as well as the Advisors’ trading styles, strategies and markets traded, expected volatility, trading results (to the extent available) and fee requirements. The General Partner may modify or terminate the allocation of assets among the Advisors and may allocate assets to additional advisors at any time.

As22 ~~of June 30, 2019 and March 31, 2019, the Partnership’s assets were allocated among the Advisors in the following approximate percentages:~~

Advisor	June 30, 2019		June 30, 2019(percentage of Partners’ Capital)			March 31, 2019		March 31, 2019(percentage of Partners’ Capital)
SECOR	$	-		-	%	$	5,587,765		21	%
AE Capital		-		-	%		2,120,788		8	%
Independent View		11,377,517		45	%		8,728,094		33	%
Katonah		13,641,450		55	%		9,808,235		38	%

As of September 30, 2019 and June 30, 2019, the Partnership’s assets were allocated among the Advisors in the following approximate percentages:


Advisor	September 30, 2019		September 30, 2019 (percentage of Partners’ Capital)			June 30, 2019		June 30, 2019 (percentage of Partners’ Capital)
Independent View	$	11,620,721		48	%	$	11,377,517		45	%
Katonah	$	12,339,675		52	%	$	13,641,450		55	%

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

The Partnership/Funds are speculative commodity pools. The market sensitive instruments held by the Partnership and the Funds are acquired for speculative trading purposes, and all or substantially all of the Partnership’s/Funds’ assets are subject to the risk of trading loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is integral, not incidental, to the Partnership’s/Funds’ main line of business.

The limited partners will not be liable for losses exceeding the current net asset value of their investment.

Market movements result in frequent changes in the fair value of the Partnership’s/Funds’ open positions and, consequently, in their earnings and cash balances. The Partnership’s/Funds’ market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including the level and volatility of interest rates, exchange rates, equity price levels, the market value of financial instruments and contracts, the diversification effects among the Partnership’s/Funds’ open contracts and the liquidity of the markets in which they trade.

The Partnership/Funds rapidly acquire and liquidate both long and short positions in a wide range of different markets. Consequently, it is not possible to predict how a particular future market scenario will affect performance, and the Partnership’s/Funds’ past performance is not necessarily indicative of their future results.

Quantifying the Partnership’s and the Funds’ Trading Value at Risk

The following quantitative disclosures regarding the Partnership’s and the Funds’ market risk exposures contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the safe harbor from civil liability provided for such statements by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (set forth in Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)). All quantitative disclosures in this section are deemed to be forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor, except for statements of historical fact.

The Partnership and the Funds account for open positions on the basis of fair value accounting principles. Any loss in the market value of the Partnership’s and each Fund’s open positions is directly reflected in the Partnership’s and each Fund’s earnings and cash flow.

The Partnership’s and the Funds’ risk exposure in the market sectors traded by the Advisors is estimated below in terms of Value at Risk. Please note that the Value at Risk model is used to numerically quantify market risk for historic reporting purposes only and is not utilized by either the General Partner or the Advisors in their daily risk management activities.

“Value at Risk” is a measure of the maximum amount which the Partnership/Funds could reasonably be expected to lose in a given market sector. However, the inherent uncertainty of the Partnership’s/Funds’ speculative trading and the recurrence in the markets traded by the Partnership/Funds of market movements far exceeding expectations could result in actual trading or non-trading losses far beyond the indicated Value at Risk or the Partnership’s/Funds’ experience to date (i.e., “risk of ruin”). In light of the foregoing, as well as the risks and uncertainties intrinsic to all future projections, the inclusion of the quantification in this section should not be considered to constitute any assurance or representation that the Partnership’s/Funds’ losses in any market sector will be limited to Values at Risk or by the Partnership’s/Funds’ attempts to manage their market risk.

Exchange margin requirements have been used by the Partnership/Funds as the measure of their Value at Risk. Margin requirements are set by exchanges to equal or exceed the maximum losses reasonably expected to be incurred in the fair value of any given contract in 95%-99% of any one-day interval. The margin levels are established by dealers and exchanges using historical price studies as well as an assessment of current market volatility (including the implied volatility of the options on a given futures contract) and economic fundamentals to provide a probabilistic estimate of the maximum expected near-term one-day price fluctuation.

Value at Risk tables represent a probabilistic assessment of the risk of loss in market risk sensitive instruments. Prior to their respective terminations, Harbour Square, SECOR and AE Capital traded the Partnership’s assets indirectly in master fund managed accounts established in the name of the master fund over which they had been granted limited authority to make trading decisions. As a result, the first trading Value at Risk table reflects the market sensitive instruments held by the Partnership directly and through its investments in the ~~Fund~~Funds as atof December 31, 2018. The remaining trading Value at Risk tables reflect the market sensitive instruments held by the Partnership directly (i.e., in the managed accounts in the Partnership’s name traded by certain Advisors) as of ~~June~~September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 and indirectly by by each Fund separately as of December 31, 2018. There has been no material change in the trading Value at Risk, non-trading risk and risk management information previously disclosed in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

The following table indicates the trading Value at Risk associated with the Partnership’s open positions by market category as of December 31, 2018, as applicable.

As of December 31, 2018, the Partnership’s total capitalization was $29,858,673.


December 31, 2018
Market Sector	Value at Risk		% of Total Capitalization
Currencies	$	972,484		3.26	%
Energy		415,992		1.39
Grains		343,936		1.15
Indices		1,687,976		5.65
Interest Rates U.S.		105,961		0.35
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		713,308		2.39
Livestock		89,704		0.30
Metals		233,022		0.78
Softs		250,693		0.84

Total	$	4,813,076		16.11	%

The following tables indicate the trading Value at Risk associated with the Partnership’s direct investments as of ~~June~~September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 and indirect investments in the Funds by market category as of December 31, 2018, and the highest, lowest and average values during the three months ~~ended~~ ~~June~~ended September 30, 2019 and the twelve months ended December 31, 2018~~, as applicable~~. All open contracts trading risk exposures have been included in calculating the figures set forth below.

AtAs ~~June~~of September 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Partnership’s Value at Risk for the portion of its assets that are traded directly was as follows:

June 30, 2019
September 30, 2019
									Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
							Three Months Ended September 30, 2019
Market Sector	Value at Risk		% of Total Capitalization				High Value at Risk		~~High Value at Risk~~		Low Value at Risk		~~Low Value at Risk~~		Average Value at Risk*		Average Value at Risk*
Currencies	$	~~557~~505,~~780~~728	~~2.23~~	2.11	%	%	$	857,974	$	~~557,780~~	$	422,743	$	~~289,100~~	$	664,206	$	~~421,099~~
Energy		~~188~~249,~~855~~787	~~0.75~~	1.04				447,920		~~435,390~~		120,350		~~120,880~~		219,945		~~197,487~~
Grains		~~146~~67,~~171~~777	~~0.58~~	0.28				193,595		~~243,434~~		40,021		~~139,643~~		85,517		~~184,115~~
Indices		1,~~150~~790,~~018~~175	~~4.60~~	7.47				3,698,816		~~2,310,233~~		1,203,350		~~644,049~~		1,707,141		~~1,238,512~~
Interest Rates U.S.		~~180~~233,~~323~~749	~~0.72~~	0.98				314,267		~~303,070~~		71,350		~~108,318~~		190,678		~~187,818~~
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		~~297~~504,~~980~~404	~~1.19~~	2.11				806,967		~~575,416~~		221,302		~~130,041~~		471,788		~~367,381~~
Livestock		2442,~~530~~680	~~0.10~~	0.18				51,508		~~35,464~~		-		~~9,460~~		28,002		~~22,182~~
Metals		~~192~~229,~~954~~900	~~0.77~~	0.96				356,505		~~222,556~~		109,494		~~87,074~~		217,963		~~134,121~~
Softs		~~189~~81,~~409~~534	~~0.76~~	0.34				245,176		~~418,304~~		81,534		~~180,495~~		149,652		~~300,372~~
Total	$	23,~~928~~705,~~020~~734	~~11.70~~	15.47	%	%

* Average of daily Values at Risk.


December 31, 2018
						Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2018
Market Sector	Value at Risk		% of Total Capitalization			High Value at Risk		Low Value at Risk		Average Value at Risk*
Currencies	$	469,560		1.57	%	$	1,950,085	$	139,052	$	337,838
Energy		224,241		0.75			349,143		86,732		175,174
Grains		219,014		0.73			384,790		78,955		170,219
Indices		933,706		3.13			2,339,758		307,112		837,912
Interest Rates U.S.		94,256		0.32			306,801		17,074		102,268
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		498,308		1.67			653,632		20,362		302,418
Livestock		13,717		0.05			152,075		5,445		32,891
Metals		39,578		0.13			220,374		5,627		53,059
Softs		204,108		0.68			243,531		19,527		108,019

Total	$	2,696,488		9.03	%

* Annual average of month-end Values at Risk.

As of June 30, 2019, the Partnership fully redeemed its investment in SECOR Master.

AtAs of December 31, 2018, SECOR Master’s total capitalization was $35,177,137 and the Partnership owned approximately 15.3% of SECOR Master. As of December 31, 2018, SECOR Master’s Value at Risk for its assets (including the portion of the Partnership’s assets allocated to SECOR for trading) was as follows:


	December 31, 2018
						Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2018
Market Sector	Value at Risk		% of Total Capitalization			High Value at Risk		Low Value at Risk		Average Value at Risk*
Currencies	$	3,287,086		9.34	%	$	6,257,227	$	1,094,272	$	3,205,784
Energy		1,253,275		3.56			1,253,275		105,559		412,027
Grains		816,485		2.32			816,485		153,069		451,748
Indices		4,929,872		14.01			6,674,279		2,219,184		4,478,112
Interest Rates U.S.		76,500		0.22			661,243		17,135		162,483
Interest Rates Non-U.S.		1,405,230		3.99			1,466,923		484,834		953,496
Livestock		496,650		1.41			522,040		38,310		313,104
Metals		1,264,343		3.59			1,372,159		617,688		955,032
Softs		304,474		0.87			720,287		204,580		501,666

Total	$	13,833,915		39.31	%

* Annual average of month-end Values at Risk.

As of April 30, 2019, the Partnership fully redeemed its investment in AE Capital Master.

As of December 31, 2018, AE Capital Master’s total capitalization was $19,658,348 and the Partnership owned approximately 13.2% of AE Capital Master. As of December 31, 2018, AE Capital Master had no Value at Risk for its assets (including the portion of the Partnership’s assets allocated to AE Capital for trading).

As of March 31, 2019, the Partnership fully redeemed its investment in Harbour Square Master. As of December 31, 2018, Harbour Square Master’s total capitalization was $7,972,677, and the Partnership owned approximately 31.3% of Harbour Square Master. As of December 31, 2018, Harbour Square Master had no Value at Risk for its assets (including the portion of the Partnership’s assets allocated to Harbour Square for trading).

As of December 31, 2018, Harbour Square Master’s total capitalization was $7,972,677, and the Partnership owned approximately 31.3% of Harbour Square Master. As of December 31, 2018, Harbour Square Master had no Value at Risk for its assets (including the portion of the Partnership’s assets allocated to Harbour Square for trading).

Item 4. Controls and Procedures.

The Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Partnership on the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods expected in the SEC’s rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Partnership in the reports it files is accumulated and communicated to management, including the President (the General Partner’s principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) (the General Partner’s principal financial officer) of the General Partner, to allow for timely decisions regarding required disclosure and appropriate SEC filings.

The General Partner is responsible for ensuring that there is an adequate and effective process for establishing, maintaining and evaluating disclosure controls and procedures for the Partnership’s external disclosures.

The General Partner’s President and CFO have evaluated the effectiveness of the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of ~~June~~September 30, 2019 and, based on that evaluation, the General Partner’s President and CFO have concluded that at that date the Partnership’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective.

The Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting is a process under the supervision of the General Partner’s President and CFO to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. These controls include policies and procedures that:

•

pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the Partnership;

•

provide reasonable assurance that (i) transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP, and (ii) the Partnership’s receipts are handled and expenditures are made only pursuant to authorizations of the General Partner; and

•

provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection and correction of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the Partnership’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

There were no changes in the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting process during the fiscal quarter ended ~~June~~September 30, 2019 that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Partnership’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.

Legal Proceedings.

This section describes the major pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business, to which MS&Co. or its subsidiaries is a party or to which any of their property is subject. There are no material legal proceedings pending against the Partnership or the General Partner.

On June 1, 2011, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated converted from a Delaware corporation to a Delaware limited ~~liability~~ liability company. As a result of that conversion, Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated is now named Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC (“MS&Co.”).

MS&Co. is a wholly-owned, indirect subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, a Delaware holding company. Morgan Stanley files periodic reports with the SEC as required by the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) which include current descriptions of material litigation and material proceedings and investigations, if any, by governmental and/or regulatory agencies or self-regulatory organizations concerning Morgan Stanley and its subsidiaries, including MS&Co. As a consolidated subsidiary of Morgan Stanley, MS&Co. does not file its own periodic reports with the SEC that contain descriptions of material litigation, proceedings and investigations. As a result, we refer you to the “Legal Proceedings” section of Morgan Stanley’s SEC 10-K filings for 2018, 2017, 2016, 2015 and 2014. In addition, MS&Co. annually prepares an Audited, Consolidated Statement of Financial Condition (“Audited Financial Statement”) that is publicly available on Morgan Stanley’s website at www.morganstanley.com. We refer you to the Commitments, Guarantees and Contingencies – Legal section of MS&Co.’s 2018 Audited Financial Statement.

In addition to the matters described in those filings, in the normal course of business, each of Morgan Stanley and MS&Co. has been named, from time to time, as a defendant in various legal actions, including arbitrations, class actions, and other litigation, arising in connection with its activities as a global diversified financial services institution. Certain of the legal actions include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. Each of Morgan Stanley and MS&Co. is also involved, from time to time, in investigations and proceedings by governmental and/or regulatory agencies or self-regulatory organizations, certain of which may result in adverse judgments, fines or penalties. The number of these investigations and proceedings has increased in recent years with regard to many financial services institutions, including Morgan Stanley and MS&Co.

MS&Co. is a Delaware limited liability company with its main business office located at 1585 Broadway, New York, New York 10036. Among other registrations and memberships, MS&Co. is registered as a futures commission merchant and is a member of the National Futures Association.

~~Regulatory~~During ~~and~~the ~~Governmental~~preceding ~~Matters~~five years, the following administrative, civil, or criminal actions pending, on appeal or concluded against MS&Co. or any of its principals are material within the meaning of CFTC Rule 4.24(l)(2) or 4.34(k)(2):

OnRegulatory ~~February 25, 2015, MS&Co. reached an agreement in principle with the United States Department of Justice, Civil Division~~ and the United States Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of California, Civil Division (collectively, the “Civil Division”) to pay $2.6 billion to resolve certain claims that the Civil Division indicated it intendedGovernmental ~~to bring against MS&Co~~Matters. ~~That settlement was finalized on February 10, 2016.~~

InOn ~~October~~February ~~2014~~25, 2015, MS&Co. reached an agreement in principle with the ~~Illinois~~United States ~~Attorney~~Department ~~General~~of Justice, Civil Division and the United States Attorney’s Office ~~(“ILAG”)~~for ~~sent~~the aNorthern ~~letter~~District toof ~~MS&Co.~~California, ~~alleging~~Civil ~~that~~Division ~~MS&Co.~~(collectively, ~~knowingly~~the ~~made~~“Civil ~~misrepresentations~~Division”) ~~related~~ to ~~RMBS~~pay ~~purchased~~$2.6 billion byto resolve certain ~~pension~~claims ~~funds~~that ~~affiliated~~the Civil ~~with~~Division ~~the~~indicated ~~State~~it ofintended ~~Illinois~~to ~~and~~bring ~~demanding~~against ~~that~~ MS&Co. ~~pay~~That settlement was finalized on February 10, 2016.

In October 2014, the Illinois Attorney General’s Office (“ILAG”) ~~approximately~~sent a letter to MS&Co. alleging that MS&Co. knowingly made misrepresentations related to RMBS purchased by certain pension funds affiliated with the State of Illinois and demanding that MS&Co. pay ILAG approximately $88 million. MS&Co. and ILAG reached an agreement to resolve the matter on February 10, 2016.

On January 13, 2015, the New York Attorney General’s Office (“NYAG”), which is also a member of the RMBS Working Group, indicated that it intended to file a lawsuit related to approximately 30 subprime securitizations sponsored by MS&Co. NYAG indicated that the lawsuit would allege that MS&Co. misrepresented or omitted material information related to the due diligence, underwriting and valuation of the loans in the securitizations and the properties securing them and indicated that its lawsuit would be brought under the Martin Act. MS&Co. and NYAG reached an agreement to resolve the matter on February 10, 2016.

On July 23, 2014, the SEC approved a settlement by MS&Co. and certain affiliates to resolve an investigation related to certain subprime RMBS transactions sponsored and underwritten by those entities in 2007. Pursuant to the settlement, MS&Co. and certain affiliates were charged with violating Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1933, agreed to pay disgorgement and penalties in an amount of $275 million and neither admitted nor denied the SEC’s findings.

On April 21, 2015, the Chicago Board Options Exchange, Incorporated (CBOE) and the CBOE Futures Exchange, LLC (CFE) filed statements of charges against MS&Co. in connection with trading by one of MS&Co.’s former traders of EEM options contracts that allegedly disrupted the final settlement price of the November 2012 VXEM futures. CBOE alleged that MS&Co. violated CBOE Rules 4.1, 4.2 and 4.7, Sections 9(a) and 10(b) of the Exchange Act, and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. CFE alleged that MS&Co. violated CFE Rules 608, 609 and 620. The matters were resolved on July 12, 2016 and June 28, 2016, respectively, without any findings of fraud. Pursuant to the settlements, MS&Co. was required to pay a $750,000 penalty to the CBOE (for which MS&Co. and an individual were jointly and severally liable) and a $400,000 penalty to the CFE (for which MS&Co. and an individual were jointly and severally liable) and $152,664 in disgorgement.

On June 18, 2015, MS&Co. entered into a settlement with the SEC and paid a fine of $500,000 as part of the Municipalities Continuing Disclosure Corporation Initiative to resolve allegations that MS&Co. failed to form a reasonable basis through adequate due diligence for believing the truthfulness of the assertions by issuers and/or obligors regarding their compliance with previous continuing disclosure undertakings pursuant to Rule 15c2-12 under the Exchange Act in connection with offerings in which MS&Co. acted as senior or sole underwriter.

On August 6, 2015, MS&Co. consented to and became the subject of an order by the CFTC to resolve allegations that MS&Co. violated CFTC Regulation 22.9(a) by failing to hold sufficient USU.S. Dollars in cleared swap segregated accounts in the United States to meet all USU.S. Dollar ~~dollar~~ obligations to cleared swaps customers. Specifically, the CFTC found that while MS&Co. at all times held sufficient funds in segregation to cover its obligations to its customers, on certain days during 2013 and 2014, it held currencies, such as euros, instead of US dollars, to meet its USU.S. dollar obligations. In addition, the CFTC found that MS&Co. violated CFTC Regulation 166.3 by failing to have in place adequate procedures to ensure that it complied with CFTC Regulation 22.9(a). Without admitting or denying the findings or conclusions and without adjudication of any issue of law or fact, MS&Co. accepted and consented to the entry of findings, ~~the imposition of a cease and desist order, a civil monetary penalty of $300,000, and undertakings related to public statements, cooperation, and payment of the monetary penalty.~~

~~On December 20, 2016, MS&Co. consented to and became~~ the ~~subject~~imposition of ~~an order by the SEC in connection with allegations that MS&Co. willfully violated Sections 15(c)(3) and 17(~~a~~)(1)~~ ofcease ~~the Exchange Act~~ and ~~Rules~~desist ~~15c3-3(e)~~order, ~~17a-5(~~a), ~~and~~civil ~~17a-5(d)~~monetary ~~thereunder,~~penalty byof ~~inaccurately calculating its Reserve Account requirement under Rule 15c3-3 by including margin loans to an affiliate in its calculations~~$300,000, ~~which resulted in making inaccurate records~~ and ~~submitting~~undertakings ~~inaccurate~~related ~~reports~~ to ~~the~~public ~~SEC. Without admitting or denying the underlying allegations and without adjudication of any issue of law or fact~~statements, ~~MS&Co. consented to a cease and desist order~~cooperation, ~~a censure,~~ and apayment ~~civil~~of the monetary penalty ~~of $7,500,000~~.

On ~~September 28~~December 20, ~~2017~~2016, MS&Co. consented to and became the ~~CFTC~~subject ~~issued~~of an order ~~filing~~by ~~and~~the ~~simultaneously~~SEC ~~settling~~in ~~charges~~connection ~~against~~with allegations that MS&Co. ~~regarding violations~~willfully violated Sections 15(c)(3) and 17(a)(1) of ~~CFTC~~the Exchange Act and Rules 15c3-3(e), 17a-5(a), and 17a-5(d) thereunder, by inaccurately calculating its Reserve Account requirement under Rule ~~166.~~15c3-3 by ~~failing~~including margin loans to ~~diligently~~an ~~supervise~~affiliate ~~the~~in ~~reconciliation~~its ofcalculations, ~~exchange~~which resulted in making inaccurate records and ~~clearing~~submitting ~~fees~~inaccurate ~~with~~reports to the ~~amounts~~SEC. Without itadmitting ~~ultimately~~or ~~charged~~denying ~~customers~~the ~~for~~underlying ~~certain~~allegations ~~transactions~~and onwithout ~~multiple~~adjudication ~~exchanges.~~of ~~The~~any ~~order~~issue ~~and~~of ~~settlement~~law ~~required~~ or fact, MS&Co. consented to ~~pay~~ a ~~$500,000~~cease ~~penalty~~ and ~~cease~~desist order, a censure, and ~~desist~~a ~~from~~civil ~~violating~~monetary ~~Rule~~penalty ~~166~~of $7,500,000.3.

On ~~November 2~~September 28, 2017, the CFTC issued an order filing and simultaneously settling charges against MS&Co. ~~for~~regarding ~~non-compliance~~violations ~~with~~of ~~applicable~~CFTC ~~rules~~Rule ~~governing~~166.3 ~~Part~~by 17failing ~~Large~~to ~~Trader~~diligently ~~reports~~supervise tothe reconciliation of exchange and clearing fees with the ~~CFTC~~amounts it ultimately charged customers for certain transactions on multiple exchanges. The order ~~requires~~and settlement required MS&Co. to pay a $~~350~~500,000 penalty and cease and desist from ~~further~~violating ~~violations~~CFTC ofRule ~~the Commodity Exchange Act~~166.3.

~~Civil~~On ~~Litigation~~November 2, 2017, the CFTC issued an order filing and simultaneously settling charges against MS&Co. for non-compliance with applicable rules governing Part 17 Large Trader reports to the CFTC. The order requires MS&Co. to pay a $350,000 penalty and cease and desist from further violations of the Commodity Exchange Act.

OnCivil ~~July 15,~~Litigation 2010, China Development Industrial Bank (“CDIB”) filed a complaint against MS&Co., styled China Development Industrial Bank v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated et al., which is pending in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County (“Supreme Court of NY”). The complaint relates to a $275 million credit default swap referencing the super senior portion of the STACK 2006-1 CDO. The complaint asserts claims for common law fraud, fraudulent inducement and fraudulent concealment and alleges that MS&Co. misrepresented the risks of the STACK 2006-1 CDO to CDIB, and that MS&Co. knew that the assets backing the CDO were of poor quality when it entered into the credit default swap with CDIB. The complaint seeks compensatory damages related to the approximately $228 million that CDIB alleges it has already lost under the credit default swap, rescission of CDIB’s obligation to pay an additional $12 million, punitive damages, equitable relief, fees and costs. On February 28, 2011, the court denied MS&Co.’s motion to dismiss the complaint. On June 27, 2018, MS&Co. filed a motion for summary judgment and spoliation sanctions against CDIB. On December 21, 2018, the court denied MS&Co.’s motion for summary judgment and granted in part MS&Co,’s motion for sanctions relating to the spoliation of evidence. On January 18, 2019, CDIB filed a motion to clarify and resettle the portion of the court’s December 21, 2018 order granting spoliation sanctions. On January 24, 2019, CDIB filed a notice of appeal from the court’s December 21, 2018 order, and on January 25, 2019, MS&Co. filed a notice of appeal from the same order. On March 7, 2019, the court denied the relief that CDIB sought in a motion to clarify and resettle the portion of the court’s December 21, 2018 order granting spoliation sanctions. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss in this action of up to approximately $240 million plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs.

30On July 15, 2010, China Development Industrial Bank (“CDIB”) filed a complaint against MS&Co., styled China Development Industrial Bank v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated et al., which is pending in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County (“Supreme Court of NY”). The complaint relates to a $275 million credit default swap referencing the super senior portion of the STACK 2006-1 CDO. The complaint asserts claims for common law fraud, fraudulent inducement and fraudulent concealment and alleges that the MS&Co. misrepresented the risks of the STACK 2006-1 CDO to CDIB, and that MS&Co, knew that the assets backing the CDO were of poor quality when it entered into the credit default swap with CDIB. The complaint seeks compensatory damages related to the approximately $228 million that CDIB alleges it has already lost under the credit default swap, rescission of CDIB’s obligation to pay an additional $12 million, punitive damages, equitable relief, fees and costs. On February 28, 2011, the court denied MS&Co.’s motion to dismiss the complaint. On June 27, 2018, MS&Co. filed a motion for summary judgment and spoliation sanctions against CDIB. On December 21, 2018, the court denied MS&Co.’s motion for summary judgment and granted in part MS&Co.’s motion for sanctions relating to the spoliation of evidence. On January 18, 2019, CDIB filed a motion to clarify and resettle the portion of the court’s December 21, 2018 order granting spoliation sanctions. On January 24, 2019, CDIB filed a notice of appeal from the court’s December 21, 2018 order, and on January 25, 2019, MS&Co. filed a notice of appeal from the same order. On March 7, 2019, the court denied the relief that CDIB sought in a motion to clarify and resettle the portion of the court’s December 21, 2018 order granting spoliation sanctions. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss in this action of up to approximately $240 million plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs.

On October 15, 2010, the Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago filed a complaint against MS&Co. and other defendants in the Circuit Court of the State of Illinois, styled Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago v. Bank of America Funding Corporation et al. A corrected amended ~~complaint~~ was filed on April 8, 2011, which alleges that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to plaintiff of a number of mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans and asserts claims under Illinois law. The total amount of certificates allegedly sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. at issue in the action was approximately $203 million. The complaint seeks, among other things, to rescind the plaintiff’s purchase of such certificates. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the corrected amended complaint on May 27, 2011, which was denied on September 19, 2012. On December 13, 2013, the court entered an order dismissing all claims related to one of the securitizations at issue. On January 18, 2017, the court entered an order dismissing all claims related to an additional securitization at issue. After those dismissals, the remaining amount of certificates allegedly issued by MS&Co. or sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $65 million. At March 25, 2019, the current unpaid balance of the mortgage pass-through certificates at issue in this action was approximately $36 million, and the certificates had not yet incurred actual losses. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss in this action up to the difference between the $36 million unpaid balance of these certificates (plus any losses incurred) and their fair market value at the time of a judgment against MS&Co., plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs. MS&Co. may be entitled to be indemnified for some of these losses and to an offset for interest received by the plaintiff prior to a judgment.

On30 May 17, 2013, plaintiff in IKB International S.A. in Liquidation, et al. v. Morgan Stanley, et al. filed a complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates in the Supreme Court of NY. The complaint alleges that defendants made material misrepresentations and omissions in the sale to plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by MS&Co. to plaintiff was approximately $133 million. The complaint alleges causes of action against MS&Co. for common law fraud, fraudulent concealment, aiding and abetting fraud, and negligent misrepresentation, and seeks, among other things, compensatory and punitive damages. On October 29, 2014, the court granted in part and denied in part MS&Co.’s motion to dismiss. All claims regarding four certificates were dismissed. After these dismissals, the remaining amount of certificates allegedly issued by MS&Co. or sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $116 million. On August 11, 2016, the Appellate Division, First Department affirmed the trial court’s decision denying in part MS&Co.’s motion to dismiss the complaint. At March 25, 2019, the current unpaid balance of the mortgage pass-through certificates at issue in this action was approximately $23 million, and the certificates had incurred actual losses of $58 million. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss in this action up to the difference between the $23 million unpaid balance of these certificates (plus any losses incurred) and their fair market value at the time of a judgment against MS&Co., or upon sale, plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs. MS&Co. may be entitled to be indemnified for some of these losses and to an offset for interest received by the plaintiff prior to a judgment.

In complaint ~~August~~was offiled ~~2017~~on April 8, 2011, which alleges that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to plaintiff of a number of mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans and asserts claims under Illinois law. The total amount of certificates allegedly sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. at issue in the action was approximately ~~named~~$203 million. asThe acomplaint ~~defendant~~seeks, inamong aother ~~purported~~things, to ~~antitrust~~rescind the ~~class~~plaintiff’s ~~action~~purchase inof such certificates. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the ~~United~~corrected ~~States~~amended ~~District~~complaint on May 27, ~~Court~~2011, ~~for~~which ~~the~~was ~~United~~denied ~~States~~on ~~District~~September 19, ~~Court~~2012. ~~for~~On December 13, 2013, the ~~Southern~~court ~~District~~entered ofan ~~New~~order ~~York~~dismissing ~~styled~~all ~~Iowa~~claims ~~Public~~related ~~Employees’~~to ~~Retirement~~one ~~System~~of etthe alsecuritizations at issue. vOn January 18, 2017, the court entered an order dismissing all claims related to an additional securitization at issue. After ~~Bank~~those dismissals, the remaining amount of ~~America~~certificates ~~Corporation~~allegedly etissued alby MS&Co. ~~Plaintiffs~~or ~~allege,~~sold ~~inter~~to ~~alia,~~plaintiff ~~that~~by MS&Co., ~~together~~was ~~with~~approximately a$65 million. At September 25, 2019, the ~~number~~current unpaid balance of ~~other~~the ~~financial~~mortgage ~~institution~~pass-through ~~defendants~~certificates at issue in this action was approximately $35 million, ~~violated~~and Uthe certificates had not yet incurred actual losses.S. ~~antitrust~~Based ~~laws~~on ~~and~~currently ~~New~~available ~~York~~information, ~~state~~MS&Co. ~~law~~believes it could incur a loss in ~~connection~~this ~~with~~action up to the difference between the $35 million unpaid balance of these certificates (plus any losses incurred) and their ~~alleged~~fair ~~efforts~~market tovalue ~~prevent~~at the ~~development~~time of ~~electronic~~a ~~exchange~~judgment against MS&Co., plus pre-~~based~~ ~~platforms~~and ~~for~~post-judgment ~~securities~~interest, ~~lending~~fees and costs. ~~The~~MS&Co. ~~class~~may ~~action complaint~~be ~~was~~entitled ~~filed~~to onbe ~~behalf~~indemnified for some of these losses and to an offset for interest received by the plaintiff prior to a ~~purported~~judgment.

31On May 17, 2013, plaintiff in IKB International S.A. in Liquidation, et al. v. Morgan Stanley, et al. filed a complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates in the Supreme Court of NY. The complaint alleges that defendants made material misrepresentations and omissions in the sale to plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by MS&Co. to plaintiff was approximately $133 million. The complaint alleges causes of action against MS&Co. for common law fraud, fraudulent concealment, aiding and abetting fraud, and negligent misrepresentation, and seeks, among other things, compensatory and punitive damages. On October 29, 2014, the court granted in part and denied in part MS&Co.’s motion to dismiss. All claims regarding four certificates were dismissed. After these dismissals, the remaining amount of certificates allegedly issued by MS&Co. or sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $116 million. On August 11, 2016, the Appellate Division, First Department affirmed the trial court’s decision denying in part MS&Co.’s motion to dismiss the complaint. At September 25, 2019, the current unpaid balance of the mortgage pass-through certificates at issue in this action was approximately $22 million, and the certificates had incurred actual losses of $58 million. Based on currently available information, MS&Co. believes it could incur a loss in this action up to the difference between the $22 million unpaid balance of these certificates (plus any losses incurred) and their fair market value at the time of a judgment against MS&Co., or upon sale, plus pre- and post-judgment interest, fees and costs. MS&Co. may be entitled to be indemnified for some of these losses and to an offset for interest received by the plaintiff prior to a judgment.

In August of 2017, MS&Co. was named as a defendant in a purported antitrust class action in the United States District Court for the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York styled Iowa Public Employees’ Retirement System et al. v. Bank of America Corporation et al. Plaintiffs allege, inter alia, that MS&Co., together with a number of other financial institution defendants, violated U.S. antitrust laws and New York state law in connection with their alleged efforts to prevent the development of electronic exchange-based platforms for securities lending. The class action complaint was filed on behalf of a purported class of borrowers and lenders who entered into stock loan transactions with the defendants. The class action complaint seeks, among other relief, certification of the class of plaintiffs and ~~treble~~ ~~damages. On September 27, 2018, the court denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss the class action complaint.~~ treble

~~Beginning~~31 on March 25, 2019, MS&Co. was named as a defendant in a series of putative class action complaints filed in the Southern District of New York, the first of which was styled Alaska Electrical Pension Fund v. BofA Secs., Inc., et al. Each complaint alleges a conspiracy to fix prices and restrain competition in the market for unsecured bonds issued by the following Government-Sponsored Enterprises: the Federal National Mortgage Association; the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation; the Federal Farm Credit Banks Funding Corporation; and the Federal Home Loan Banks. Each complaint raises a claim under Section 1 of the Sherman Act and seeks, among other things, injunctive relief and treble compensatory damages. On May 23, 2019, plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended class action complaint, now styled In re GSE Bonds Antitrust Litigation. The purported class period in the consolidated amended complaint is now from January 1, 2009 to January 1, 2016. On June 13, 2019, the defendants filed a joint motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint.

~~Settled~~ damages. ~~Civil~~On ~~Litigation~~September 27, 2018, the court denied the defendants’ motion to dismiss the class action complaint.

OnBeginning ~~December~~on March 2325, ~~2009~~2019, ~~the~~MS&Co. ~~Federal~~was ~~Home~~named ~~Loan~~as ~~Bank~~a ofdefendant ~~Seattle~~in ~~filed~~ a ~~complaint against~~series ~~MS&Co.~~of ~~and~~putative ~~another defendant~~class action complaints filed in the ~~Superior~~Southern ~~Court~~District of New York, the ~~State~~first of ~~Washington,~~which was styled ~~Federal~~Alaska ~~Home~~Electrical ~~Loan~~Pension ~~Bank~~Fund ~~of Seattle~~ v. ~~Morgan~~BofA ~~Stanley & Co~~Secs., Inc., et al. ~~The~~ ~~amended~~Each complaint, ~~filed~~alleges ona ~~September~~conspiracy ~~28,~~to ~~2010,~~fix ~~alleged~~prices ~~that defendants made untrue statements~~ and ~~material~~restrain ~~omissions~~competition in the ~~sale~~market tofor ~~plaintiff~~unsecured ofbonds ~~certain~~issued ~~mortgage~~by the ~~pass~~following Government-~~through~~Sponsored ~~certificates~~Enterprises: ~~backed~~the byFederal ~~securitization~~National ~~trusts~~Mortgage ~~containing~~Association; the ~~residential~~Federal ~~mortgage~~Home ~~loans.~~Loan ~~The~~Mortgage ~~total~~Corporation; ~~amount~~the ofFederal ~~certificates~~Farm ~~allegedly~~Credit ~~sold~~Banks toFunding ~~plaintiff~~Corporation; ~~by MS&Co.~~and ~~was~~the ~~approximately~~Federal ~~$233~~Home ~~million~~Loan Banks. ~~The~~Each complaint raises ~~raised~~a ~~claims~~claim under ~~the~~Section 1 ~~Washington~~of ~~State~~the ~~Securities~~Sherman Act and ~~sought~~seeks, among other things, injunctive relief and treble compensatory damages. On May 23, 2019, plaintiffs filed a consolidated amended class action complaint, now styled In re GSE Bonds Antitrust Litigation. The purported class period in the consolidated amended complaint is now from January 1, 2009 to ~~rescind~~January 1, 2016. On June 13, 2019, the ~~plaintiff’s~~defendants ~~purchase~~filed ofa ~~such~~joint ~~certificates~~motion to dismiss the consolidated amended complaint. On ~~January 23~~August 29, ~~2017~~2019, the ~~parties~~ ~~reached~~court anin ~~agreement~~In re GSE Bonds Antitrust Litigation denied MS&Co.’s motion to ~~settle~~dismiss. ~~the~~The ~~litigation~~case is set for trial in May 2020.

OnSettled ~~March 15,~~Civil ~~2010,~~Litigation the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco filed a complaint against MS&Co. and other defendants in the Superior Court of the State of California styled Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, et al. An amended complaint filed on June 10, 2010 alleged that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the sale to plaintiff of a number of mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The amount of certificates allegedly sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $704 million. The complaint raised claims under both the federal securities laws and California law and sought, among other things, to rescind the plaintiff’s purchase of such certificates. On January 26, 2015, as a result of a settlement with certain other defendants, the plaintiff requested and the court subsequently entered a dismissal with prejudice of certain of the plaintiff’s claims, including all remaining claims against MS&Co.

On ~~March~~December 1523, ~~2010~~2009, the Federal Home Loan Bank of ~~San~~Seattle ~~Francisco~~ filed a complaint against MS&Co. and ~~other~~another defendant ~~defendants~~ in the Superior Court of the State of ~~California~~Washington, styled Federal Home Loan Bank of ~~San Francisco~~ Seattle v. ~~Deutsche~~Morgan ~~Bank~~Stanley & ~~Securities~~ Co. Inc. , et al. The An amended complaint, filed on ~~June~~September 1028, 2010, alleged that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in ~~connection with~~ the sale to plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $~~276~~ 233 million. The complaint raised claims under the Washington State Securities Act and sought, among other things, to rescind the plaintiff’s purchase of such certificates. On January 23, 2017, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

32On March 15, 2010, the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco filed a complaint against MS&Co. and other defendants in the Superior Court of the State of California styled Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco v. Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC, et al. An amended complaint filed on June 10, 2010 alleged that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the sale to plaintiff of a number of mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The amount of certificates allegedly sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. was approximately $704 million. The complaint raised claims under both the federal securities laws and California law and sought, among other things, to rescind the plaintiff’s purchase of such certificates. On January 26, 2015, as a result of a settlement with certain other defendants, the plaintiff requested and the court subsequently entered a dismissal with prejudice of certain of the plaintiff’s claims, including all remaining claims against MS&Co.

~~claims~~On ~~under~~March 15, ~~both~~2010, the ~~federal~~Federal ~~securities~~Home ~~laws~~Loan ~~and~~Bank ~~California~~of ~~law~~San ~~and~~Francisco ~~sought,~~filed ~~among~~a complaint against MS&Co. and other ~~things,~~defendants in tothe ~~rescind~~ Superior Court of the ~~plaintiff’s~~State ~~purchase~~of California styled Federal Home Loan Bank of ~~such~~San Francisco v. ~~certificates~~Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. Onet ~~December~~al. 21An amended complaint, filed on June 10, ~~2016~~2010, alleges that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the ~~parties~~sale ~~reached~~to anplaintiff ~~agreement~~of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The amount of certificates allegedly sold to ~~settle~~plaintiff ~~the~~by ~~litigation~~MS&Co. was approximately $276 million. The complaint raised claims under both the federal securities laws and California law and sought, among other

On32 October 25, 2010, MS&Co., certain affiliates and Pinnacle Performance Limited, a special purpose vehicle (“SPV”), were named as defendants in a purported class action in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“SDNY”), styled Ge Dandong, et al. v. Pinnacle Performance Ltd., et al. On January 31, 2014, the plaintiffs in the action, which related to securities issued by the SPV in Singapore, filed a second amended complaint, which asserted common law claims of fraud, aiding and abetting fraud, fraudulent inducement, aiding and abetting fraudulent inducement, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. On July 17, 2014, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation, which received final court approval on July 2, 2015.

~~On July 5, 2011, Allstate Insurance Company and certain of its affiliated entities filed~~ ~~a complaint against MS&Co. in the Supreme Court of NY~~things, styled Allstate Insurance Company, et al. v. Morgan Stanley, et al. An amended complaint was filed on September 9, 2011, and alleged that the defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to rescind the plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly issued and/or sold to the plaintiffs by MS&Co. was approximately $104 million. The complaint raised common law claims of fraud, fraudulent inducement, aiding and abetting fraud, and negligent misrepresentation and sought, among other things, compensatory and/or recessionary damages associated with the plaintiffsplaintiff’s ~~purchases~~purchase of such certificates. On ~~January 16~~December 21, ~~2015~~2016, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

On ~~July~~October 1825, ~~2011~~2010, ~~the~~MS&Co., ~~Western~~certain affiliates and ~~Southern~~Pinnacle ~~Life~~Performance ~~Insurance~~Limited, ~~Company~~a ~~and~~special ~~certain~~purpose ~~affiliated companies filed a~~vehicle ~~complaint against~~(“SPV”), ~~MS&Co.~~were ~~and~~named ~~other~~as defendants in ~~the~~ ~~Court~~a ofpurported ~~Common~~class ~~Pleas~~action in ~~Ohio,~~the ~~styled~~United ~~Western~~States ~~and~~District Court for the Southern ~~Life~~District ~~Insurance~~of ~~Company~~New York (“SDNY”), styled Ge Dandong, et al. v. ~~Morgan~~Pinnacle ~~Stanley~~Performance ~~Mortgage Capital Inc~~Ltd., et al. On January An31, ~~amended~~2014, ~~complaint~~the ~~was~~plaintiffs ~~filed on~~in ~~April 2~~the action, ~~2012~~which ~~and~~related ~~alleged~~to ~~that~~securities ~~defendants~~issued ~~made~~by ~~untrue~~the ~~statements~~SPV ~~and~~in ~~material~~Singapore, ~~omissions~~filed ina ~~the~~second ~~sale~~amended tocomplaint, ~~plaintiffs~~which ofasserted ~~certain~~common ~~mortgage~~law ~~pass-through~~claims ~~certificates~~of ~~backed~~fraud, byaiding ~~securitization~~and ~~trusts~~abetting ~~containing~~fraud, ~~residential~~fraudulent ~~mortgage~~inducement, ~~loans.~~aiding and ~~The~~abetting ~~amount of~~fraudulent ~~the~~inducement, ~~certificates~~and ~~allegedly~~breach ~~sold~~of tothe ~~plaintiffs~~implied bycovenant ~~MS&Co.~~of ~~was~~good ~~approximately~~faith ~~$153~~and ~~million~~fair dealing. On ~~June 8~~July 17, ~~2015~~2014, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation, which received final court approval on July 2, 2015.

On ~~April~~July 255, ~~2012~~2011, ~~The~~Allstate ~~Prudential~~ Insurance Company ~~of America~~ and certain ~~affiliates~~of its affiliated entities filed a complaint against MS&Co. ~~and certain affiliates~~ in the ~~Superior~~Supreme Court of ~~the State of New Jersey~~NY, styled ~~The~~Allstate ~~Prudential~~ Insurance Company ~~of America~~, et al. v. Morgan Stanley, et al. OnAn ~~October 16,~~amended ~~2012,~~complaint ~~plaintiffs~~was filed anon ~~amended~~September 9, ~~complaint.~~2011, ~~The amended~~and ~~complaint~~ alleged that the defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in ~~connection with~~ the sale to the plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly ~~sponsored,~~issued ~~underwritten~~ and/or sold to the plaintiffs by MS&Co. was approximately $1104 million.~~073~~ ~~billion.~~ The ~~amended~~ complaint raised ~~claims under the New Jersey Uniform Securities Law, as well as~~ common law claims of ~~negligent misrepresentation,~~ fraud, fraudulent inducement, ~~equitable fraud,~~ aiding and abetting fraud, and ~~violations~~negligent ofmisrepresentation ~~the~~and ~~New~~sought, ~~Jersey~~among ~~RICO~~other ~~statute~~things, compensatory and/or ~~included~~recessionary adamages ~~claim~~associated with ~~for~~the ~~treble~~plaintiffs’ ~~damages~~purchases of such certificates. On January 816, ~~2016~~2015, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

InOn reJuly 18, 2011, the Western and Southern Life Insurance Company and certain affiliated companies filed a complaint against MS&Co. and other defendants in the Court of Common Pleas in Ohio, styled Western and Southern Life Insurance Company, et al. v. Morgan Stanley Mortgage ~~Pass-Through~~Capital ~~Certificates~~Inc., ~~Litigation~~et al. An amended complaint was filed on April 2, ~~which~~2012 ~~had~~and ~~been~~alleged ~~pending~~that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in the sale to plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The amount ~~SDNY,~~of ~~was~~the acertificates ~~putative~~allegedly ~~class~~sold ~~action~~to ~~involving~~plaintiffs ~~allegations~~by ~~that,~~MS&Co. ~~among~~was ~~other~~approximately ~~things~~$153 million. On June 8, 2015, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

33On April 25, 2012, The Prudential Insurance Company of America and certain affiliates filed a complaint against MS&Co. and certain affiliates in the Superior Court of the State of New Jersey, styled The Prudential Insurance Company of America, et al. v. Morgan Stanley, et al. On October 16, 2012, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint. The amended complaint alleged that defendants made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the sale to plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by MS&Co. was approximately $1.073 billion. The amended complaint raised claims under the New Jersey Uniform Securities Law, as well as common law claims of negligent misrepresentation, fraud, fraudulent inducement, equitable fraud, aiding and abetting fraud, and violations of the New Jersey RICO statute, and includes a claim for treble damages. On January 8, 2016, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

~~the~~In ~~registration~~re ~~statements~~Morgan ~~and~~Stanley ~~offering~~Mortgage ~~documents~~Pass-Through ~~related~~Certificates toLitigation, ~~the~~which ~~offerings~~had ofbeen pending ~~certain mortgage pass-through certificates~~ in ~~2006~~the ~~and~~SDNY, ~~2007~~was ~~contained~~a ~~false~~putative ~~and~~class ~~misleading~~action ~~information~~involving ~~concerning the~~allegations ~~pools of residential loans~~ that, ~~backed~~among ~~these~~other ~~securitizations. On December 18~~things, ~~2014,~~ the ~~parties’~~registration ~~agreement~~statements ~~to settle the litigation received final court approval,~~ and onoffering ~~December~~documents ~~19,~~related ~~2014,~~to the ~~court~~offerings ~~entered~~of ancertain ~~order~~mortgage ~~dismissing the action.~~

On33 November 4, 2011, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), as receiver for Franklin Bank S.S.B, filed two complaints against MS&Co. in the District Court of the State of Texas. Each was styled Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation as Receiver for Franklin Bank, S.S.B v. Morgan Stanley & Company LLC F/K/A Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. and alleged that MS&Co. made untrue statements and material omissions in connection with the sale to plaintiff of mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The amount of certificates allegedly underwritten and sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. in these cases was approximately $67 million and $35 million, respectively. On July 2, 2015, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

On pass-through ~~February 14,~~certificates ~~2013,~~in ~~Bank~~2006 ~~Hapoalim~~and ~~B.M.~~2007 ~~filed~~contained afalse ~~complaint against MS&Co.~~ and ~~certain~~misleading ~~affiliates~~information inconcerning the ~~Supreme~~pools ~~Court~~ of ~~NY,~~residential ~~styled~~loans ~~Bank Hapoalim B.M. v. Morgan Stanley et al. The complaint alleged~~ that ~~defendants made material misrepresentations and omissions in the sale to plaintiff of certain mortgage pass-through certificates~~ backed ~~by securitization~~these ~~trusts containing residential mortgage loans~~securitizations. ~~The~~ ~~total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by MS&Co. to plaintiff was approximately $141 million.~~ On ~~July 28~~December 18, ~~2015~~2014, the parties’ ~~reached an~~ agreement to settle the litigation received final court approval, and on ~~August 12~~December 19, ~~2015~~2014, the ~~plaintiff~~court ~~filed~~entered aan ~~stipulation~~order ofdismissing ~~discontinuance~~the ~~with prejudice~~action.

On ~~September~~November 234, ~~2013~~2011, the ~~plaintiff~~Federal inDeposit ~~National~~Insurance ~~Credit~~Corporation ~~Union~~(“FDIC”), ~~Administration~~as ~~Board~~receiver v.for ~~Morgan~~Franklin ~~Stanley &~~Bank CoS. ~~Inc~~S.B, ~~et al.~~ filed atwo ~~complaint~~complaints against MS&Co. ~~and~~in ~~certain~~the ~~affiliates~~District inCourt of the ~~SDNY~~State of Texas. ~~The~~Each ~~complaint~~was ~~alleged~~styled ~~that~~Federal ~~defendants~~Deposit ~~made~~Insurance ~~untrue~~Corporation ~~statements~~as ofReceiver ~~material~~for ~~fact~~Franklin orBank, ~~omitted~~S.S.B tov. ~~state~~Morgan Stanley & Company LLC F/K/A Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc. and alleged that MS&Co. made untrue statements and material ~~facts~~omissions in connection with the sale to ~~the~~ plaintiff of ~~certain~~ mortgage pass-through certificates ~~issued~~backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The ~~total~~ amount of certificates allegedly ~~sponsored,~~ underwritten and~~/or~~ sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. ~~to plaintiffs~~ in ~~the~~these ~~matter~~cases was approximately $~~417~~ 67 million. ~~The complaint alleged violations of federal~~ and ~~various state securities laws and sought~~$35 million, ~~among other things, rescissionary and compensatory damages~~respectively. On ~~November~~July 232, 2015, the parties reached an agreement to settle the ~~matter~~litigation.

On ~~September~~February 1614, ~~2014~~2013, ~~the~~Bank ~~Virginia~~Hapoalim ~~Attorney~~B.M. ~~General’s Office~~ filed a ~~civil~~complaint ~~lawsuit, styled Commonwealth of Virginia ex rel. Integra REC LLC v. Barclays Capital Inc., et al.,~~ against MS&Co. and ~~several~~certain ~~other~~affiliates ~~defendants~~ in the ~~Circuit~~Supreme Court of ~~the~~NY, ~~City~~styled ofBank ~~Richmond~~Hapoalim ~~related~~B.M. ~~to RMBS~~v. ~~The~~Morgan ~~lawsuit~~Stanley ~~alleged~~et ~~that MS&Co~~al. The ~~and~~complaint ~~the~~alleged ~~other~~that defendants ~~knowingly~~ made material misrepresentations and omissions ~~related~~in to the ~~loans~~sale ~~backing~~to ~~RMBS~~plaintiff ~~purchased~~of bycertain ~~the~~mortgage pass-through ~~Virginia~~certificates ~~Retirement~~backed ~~System.~~by ~~The~~securitization ~~complaint~~trusts ~~asserted~~containing ~~claims~~residential ~~under~~mortgage ~~the~~loans. The ~~Virginia~~total ~~Fraud~~amount ~~Against Taxpayers Act, as well as common law claims~~ of ~~actual~~certificates ~~and constructive~~allegedly ~~fraud~~sponsored, underwritten and/or ~~sought,~~sold ~~among~~by ~~other~~MS&Co. ~~things,~~to ~~treble~~plaintiff ~~damages~~was ~~and civil penalties~~approximately $141 million. On ~~January~~July 628, ~~2016~~2015, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation., Anand ~~order~~on ~~dismissing~~August 12, 2015, the ~~action~~plaintiff ~~with~~filed ~~prejudice~~a ~~was~~stipulation ~~entered~~of ondiscontinuance ~~January 28, 2016~~with prejudice.

On ~~April~~September 2023, ~~2011~~2013, the ~~Federal~~plaintiff ~~Home~~in ~~Loan~~National ~~Bank~~Credit ofUnion ~~Boston~~Administration Board v. Morgan Stanley & Co. Inc., et al. filed a complaint against MS&Co. and ~~other defendants~~certain affiliates in the ~~Superior~~SDNY. ~~Court~~The complaint alleged that defendants made untrue statements of material fact or omitted to state material facts in the sale ~~Commonwealth~~to the plaintiff of ~~Massachusetts~~certain ~~styled~~mortgage ~~Federal~~pass-through ~~Home~~certificates ~~Loan~~issued ~~Bank~~by ofsecuritization ~~Boston~~trusts vcontaining residential mortgage loans. ~~Ally~~The ~~Financial~~total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, ~~Inc.~~underwritten Fand/~~K/A~~or ~~GMAC~~sold ~~LLC~~by ~~et al~~MS&Co. Anto ~~amended~~plaintiffs ~~complaint~~in the matter was ~~filed~~approximately ~~on June~~$417 ~~29,~~million. ~~2012~~The ~~and~~complaint alleged ~~that~~violations ~~defendants~~of ~~made untrue~~federal ~~statements~~and various state securities laws and ~~material~~sought, ~~omissions~~among inother things, rescissionary and compensatory damages. On November 23, 2015, the ~~sale~~parties toreached ~~plaintiff~~an agreement ofto ~~certain~~settle ~~mortgage~~the ~~pass-through~~matter.

34On September 16, 2014, the Virginia Attorney General’s Office filed a civil lawsuit, styled Commonwealth of Virginia ex rel. Integra REC LLC v. Barclays Capital Inc., et al., against MS&Co. and several other defendants in the Circuit Court of the City of Richmond related to RMBS. The lawsuit alleged that MS&Co. and the other defendants knowingly made misrepresentations and omissions related to the loans backing RMBS purchased by the Virginia Retirement System. The complaint asserts claims under the Virginia Fraud Against Taxpayers Act, as well as common law claims of actual and constructive fraud, and sought, among other things, treble damages and civil penalties. On January 6, 2016, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation. An order dismissing the action with prejudice was entered on January 28, 2016.

~~certificates~~On ~~backed~~April 20, by2011, ~~securitization~~the ~~trusts~~Federal ~~containing~~Home ~~residential~~Loan ~~mortgage~~Bank ~~loans. The total amount~~ of ~~certificates~~Boston ~~allegedly~~filed ~~issued~~a complaint byagainst MS&Co. orand ~~sold~~other todefendants ~~plaintiff~~in bythe ~~MS&Co.~~Superior ~~was approximately~~Court ~~$385~~of ~~million.~~the ~~The~~Commonwealth ~~amended~~of ~~complaint raised claims under the~~ Massachusetts ~~Uniform~~styled ~~Securities~~Federal ~~Act,~~Home ~~the~~Loan ~~Massachusetts~~Bank ~~Consumer~~of ~~Protection~~Boston ~~Act~~v. ~~and~~Ally ~~common law and sought~~Financial, ~~among~~Inc. ~~other~~F/K/A ~~things,~~GMAC toLLC ~~rescind~~et ~~the~~al. ~~plaintiff’s~~An ~~purchase~~amended ofcomplaint ~~such certificates.~~was Onfiled ~~November 25,~~on ~~2013, July~~June 1629, 2012 ~~2014,~~ and ~~May~~alleged ~~19,~~that ~~2015,~~defendants ~~respectively,~~made ~~the~~untrue ~~plaintiff~~statements ~~voluntarily~~and ~~dismissed~~material ~~its~~omissions ~~claims~~in ~~against~~the ~~MS&Co.~~sale ~~with respect~~ to ~~three~~plaintiff of ~~the~~certain ~~securitizations~~mortgage atpass-through ~~issue. After these voluntary dismissals, the remaining amount of~~ certificates ~~allegedly~~backed ~~issued~~ by ~~MS&Co.~~securitization ortrusts ~~sold~~containing toresidential ~~plaintiff~~mortgage ~~by MS&Co~~loans. ~~was~~The ~~approximately $332 million. On July 13, 2018, the parties reached an agreement in principle to settle the litigation.~~ total

On34 May 3, 2013, plaintiffs in Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank AG et al. v. Morgan Stanley et al. filed a complaint against the Firm, certain affiliates, and other defendants in the Supreme Court of NY. The complaint alleged that defendants made material misrepresentations and omissions in the sale to plaintiffs of certain mortgage pass-through certificates backed by securitization trusts containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by the Firm to plaintiff was approximately $634 million. The complaint alleged causes of action against the Firm for common law fraud, fraudulent concealment, aiding and abetting fraud, negligent misrepresentation, and rescission and seeks, among other things, compensatory and punitive damages. On June 26, 2018, the parties entered into an agreement to settle the litigation.

On amount ~~April 1,~~of ~~2016,~~certificates ~~the~~allegedly ~~California~~issued ~~Attorney~~by ~~General’s~~MS&Co. ~~Office filed~~or ansold ~~action~~to ~~against~~plaintiff by MS&Co. inwas ~~California~~approximately ~~state~~$385 million. ~~court~~The ~~styled~~amended ~~California~~complaint v.raised ~~Morgan~~claims ~~Stanley,~~under etthe ~~al.~~Massachusetts Uniform Securities Act, onthe ~~behalf~~Massachusetts ofConsumer ~~California~~Protection ~~investors,~~Act ~~including~~and ~~the~~common ~~California~~law ~~Public~~and ~~Employees’~~sought, ~~Retirement~~among ~~System~~other ~~and~~things, ~~the~~to ~~California~~rescind ~~Teachers~~the plaintiff’ ~~Retirement~~s ~~System.~~purchase ~~The~~of ~~complaint~~such ~~alleged~~certificates. ~~that~~On ~~MS&Co.~~November 25, ~~made~~2013, ~~misrepresentations~~July 16, 2014, and ~~omissions~~May 19, ~~regarding~~2015, respectively, ~~residential~~the ~~mortgage-backed~~plaintiff ~~securities~~voluntarily ~~and~~dismissed ~~notes~~its ~~issued~~claims byagainst ~~the~~MS&Co. ~~Cheyne~~with ~~SIV,~~respect ~~and~~to ~~asserts~~three ~~violations~~ of the ~~California~~securitizations ~~False~~at ~~Claims~~issue. ~~Act~~After ~~and~~these ~~other state~~voluntary ~~laws~~dismissals, ~~and~~the ~~sought~~remaining ~~treble~~amount ~~damages,~~of ~~civil~~certificates ~~penalties,~~allegedly ~~disgorgement,~~issued ~~and~~by ~~injunctive~~MS&Co. ~~relief~~or sold to plaintiff by MS&Co. Onwas ~~April~~approximately 24$332 million. On July 13, ~~2019~~2018, the parties reached an agreement in principle to settle the litigation.

~~Additional~~On ~~lawsuits~~May 3, ~~containing~~2013, ~~claims~~plaintiffs ~~similar~~in toDeutsche ~~those~~Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank ~~described~~AG ~~above~~et ~~may~~al. bev. ~~filed~~Morgan inStanley ~~the~~et ~~future~~al. Infiled ~~the course of its~~a ~~business,~~complaint against MS&Co., ascertain aaffiliates, ~~major~~and ~~futures~~other ~~commission~~defendants ~~merchant,~~in isthe ~~party~~Supreme toCourt ~~various~~of ~~civil~~NY. ~~actions,~~The ~~claims~~complaint ~~and~~alleged ~~routine~~that ~~regulatory~~defendants ~~investigations~~made material misrepresentations and ~~proceedings~~omissions ~~that~~in the ~~General~~sale ~~Partner~~to ~~believes~~plaintiffs doof ~~not~~certain ~~have~~mortgage apass-through certificates ~~material~~backed ~~effect~~by onsecuritization ~~the~~trusts ~~business~~containing residential mortgage loans. The total amount of certificates allegedly sponsored, underwritten and/or sold by MS&Co. to plaintiff was approximately $634 million. The complaint alleges causes of action against MS&Co. ~~may~~for ~~establish~~common ~~reserves~~law ~~from~~fraud, ~~time~~fraudulent toconcealment, ~~time~~aiding inand ~~connections~~abetting ~~with~~fraud, ~~such~~negligent ~~actions~~misrepresentation, and rescission and sought, among other things, compensatory and punitive damages. On June 26, 2018, the parties entered into an agreement to settle the litigation.

35On April 1, 2016, the California Attorney General’s Office filed an action against MS&Co. in California state court styled California v. Morgan Stanley, et al., on behalf of California investors, including the California Public Employees’ Retirement System and the California Teachers’ Retirement System. The complaint alleged that MS&Co. made misrepresentations and omissions regarding residential mortgage-backed securities and notes issued by the Cheyne SIV, and asserted violations of the California False Claims Act and other state laws and seeks treble damages, civil penalties, disgorgement, and injunctive relief. On April 24, 2019, the parties reached an agreement to settle the litigation.

~~Item lA~~Additional lawsuits containing claims similar to those described above may be filed in the future. ~~Risk~~ ~~Factors~~In the course of its business, MS&Co., as a major futures commission merchant, is party to various civil actions, claims and routine regulatory investigations and proceedings that the General Partner believes do not have a material effect on the business of MS&Co. MS&Co. may establish reserves from time to time in connections with such actions.

~~There~~35 have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth under Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 as updated by Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” in the Partnership’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2019.

Item lA. Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes to the risk factors set forth under Part I, Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” in the Partnership’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 as updated by Part II, Item 1A. “Risk Factors.” in the Partnership’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2019 and June 30, 2019.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

For the three months ended ~~June~~September 30, 2019, there were no additional subscriptions of Redeemable Units. Redeemable Units are issued in reliance upon applicable exemptions from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Section 506 of Regulation D promulgated thereunder. Redeemable Units are purchased by accredited investors as defined in Regulation D. In determining the applicability of the exemption, the General Partner relies on the fact that Redeemable Units are purchased by accredited investors in a private offering.

Proceeds from the sale of Redeemable Units are used in the trading of commodity interests including futures, option, forward and swap contracts.

The following chart sets forth the purchases of limited partner Redeemable Units by the Partnership.

Period	Class A (a)Total Numberof RedeemableUnits Purchased*		Class A (b) Average Price Paid perRedeemable Unit**	~~Class A~~ (bc)~~AveragePrice~~ ~~Paid~~Total perRedeemableUnit**Number ofRedeemable UnitsPurchased as Part of PubliclyAnnounced Plans or Programs		(d) MaximumNumber (or ApproximateDollar Value) ofRedeemable Units that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans orPrograms	~~(c) Total Number of RedeemableUnits Purchasedas Part of PubliclyAnnounced Plans or Programs~~		~~(d) MaximumNumber (or ApproximateDollar Value) ofRedeemable Units that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans orPrograms~~
April 1, 2019 - April 30, 2019		545.2340		$	1,135.94			N/A		N/A
July 1, 2019 - July 31, 2019	386.7720		$ 1,158.39	N/A		N/A
May 1, 2019 - May 31, 2019		714.5630		$	1,112.74			N/A		N/A
August 1, 2019 - August 31, 2019	245.0430		$ 1,157.46	N/A		N/A
June 1, 2019 - June 30, 2019		305.5890		$	1,153.98			N/A		N/A
September 1, 2019 - September 30, 2019	420.1860		$ 1,161.45	N/A		N/A
		1,565.3860		$	1,128.87
	1,052.0010		$ 1,159.40

Generally, limited partners are permitted to redeem their Redeemable Units as of the end of each month on three business days’ notice to the General Partner. Under certain circumstances, the General Partner can compel redemption, although to date the General Partner has not exercised this right. Purchases of Redeemable Units by the Partnership reflected in the chart above were made in the ordinary course of the Partnership’s business in connection with effecting redemptions for limited partners.

**	Redemptions of Redeemable Units are effected as of the last day of each month at the net asset value per Redeemable Unit as of that day. No fee will be charged for redemptions.

Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities. — None.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures. — Not Applicable.

Item 5. Other Information. — None.

Item 6. Exhibits.

31.1 —		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d—14(a) Certification (Certification of President and Director) (filed herewith).
31.2 —		Rule 13a-14(a)/15d—14(a) Certification (Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Director) (filed herewith).
32.1 —		Section 1350 Certification (Certification of President and Director) (filed herewith).
32.2 —		Section 1350 Certification (Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Director) (filed herewith).

31.1 — Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Certification of President and Director) (filed herewith).

31.2 — Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Director) (filed herewith).

32.1 — Section 1350 Certification (Certification of President and Director) (filed herewith).

32.2 — Section 1350 Certification (Certification of Chief Financial Officer and Director) (filed herewith).


101.INS		XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

EMERGING CTA PORTFOLIO L.P.
By: Ceres Managed Futures LLC
(General Partner)
By:		/s/ Patrick T. Egan
		Patrick T. Egan
		President and Director
Date: August 8, 2019
By:		/s/ Steven Ross
		Steven Ross
		Chief Financial Officer and Director
		(Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: August 8, 2019

EMERGING CTA PORTFOLIO L.P.


By:		Ceres Managed Futures LLC
(General Partner)

By:		/s/ Patrick T. Egan
		Patrick T. Egan
		President and Director

Date: November 7, 2019

By:		/s/ Steven Ross
		Steven Ross
		Chief Financial Officer and Director
		(Principal Accounting Officer)

Date: November 7, 2019

The General Partner which signed the above is the only party authorized to act for the registrant. The registrant has no principal executive officer, principal financial officer, controller, or principal accounting officer and has no Board of Directors.

Filing Compare · EMERGING CTA PORTFOLIO LP