UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

☒	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended March 31, ~~2018~~2019

☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

333-183569-06

(Commission file number of Issuing Entity)

NISSAN AUTO RECEIVABLES 2015-A OWNER TRUST

(Exact name of issuing entity specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of issuing entity: 0001633532

333-183569

(Commission file number of Depositor)

NISSAN AUTO RECEIVABLES CORPORATION II

(Exact name of depositor as specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of depositor: 0001129068

NISSAN MOTOR ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION

(Exact name of sponsor as specified in its charter)

Central Index Key Number of sponsor: 0001540639

DELAWARE		38-7133768
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization of the Issuing Entity)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
One Nissan Way, Franklin, Tennessee		37067
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

One Nissan Way, Franklin, Tennessee		37067
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (615) 725-1121

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically ~~and posted on its corporate Web site, if any,~~ every Interactive Data File required to be submitted ~~and posted~~ pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit ~~and post~~ such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark ifwhether ~~disclosure~~the ofregistrant ~~delinquent~~is ~~filers~~a ~~pursuant~~large toaccelerated ~~Item~~filer, ~~405~~an ofaccelerated ~~Regulation~~filer, ~~S-K~~a ~~(§229.405 of~~non-accelerated ~~this~~filer, ~~chapter)~~a issmaller ~~not~~reporting ~~contained herein~~company, ~~and~~or ~~will~~emerging ~~not~~growth becompany. ~~contained,~~See to the ~~best~~definitions of ~~registrant’s~~“large ~~knowledge~~accelerated filer,” in“accelerated ~~definitive~~filer,” ~~proxy~~“smaller orreporting ~~information~~company,” ~~statements~~and ~~incorporated~~“emerging bygrowth ~~reference~~company” in ~~Part~~Rule ~~III~~12b-2 of ~~this~~the ~~Form 10-K~~Exchange ~~or any amendment to this Form 10-K~~Act. ☒:

~~Indicate~~Large ~~by check~~Accelerated ~~mark~~Filer: ~~whether~~☐ ~~the~~Accelerated ~~registrant~~Filer: is☐ ~~a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non~~Non-~~accelerated~~Accelerated ~~filer,~~Filer: a☒ ~~smaller~~Smaller reporting company,: or☐ ~~emerging~~Emerging growth company~~. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act~~: ☐

Large Accelerated Filer: ☐ Accelerated Filer: ☐ Non-Accelerated Filer: ☒ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) Smaller reporting company: ☐ Emerging growth company: ☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. Not applicable.

Registrant has no common equity outstanding held by non-affiliates.

PART I

The following items have been omitted in accordance with General Instructions J(1) to Form 10-K:

(A)

Item 1. Business.

(B)

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

(C)

Item 2. Properties.

(D)

Item 3. Legal Proceedings.

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments.

Nothing to report.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Nothing to report.

PART II

The following items have been omitted in accordance with General Instructions J(1) to Form 10-K:

(A)

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

(B)

Item 6. Selected Financial Data.

(C)

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

(D)

Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.

(E)

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

(F)

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure.

(G)

Item 9A. Controls and Procedures.

Item 9B. Other Information.

Nothing to report.

PART III

The following items have been omitted in accordance with General Instructions J(1) to Form 10-K:

(A)

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

(B)

Item 11. Executive Compensation.

(C)

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters.

(D)

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

(E)

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules.

(a)(1) Not applicable.

(a)(2) Not applicable.

(a)(3) The exhibits filed in response to Item 601 of Regulation S-K are listed in Item 15(b) below.

(b) The exhibits filed in response to Item 601 of Regulation S-K.

The following exhibits are filed as part of this annual report or, where indicated, were heretofore filed and are hereby incorporated by reference.

Exhibit No.
3.1		Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Nissan Auto Receivables Corporation II (“NARC II”) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of Form SF-3, dated December 14, 2015, and filed by NARC II, as depositor (the “Depositor”) with the SEC on December 14, 2015, File No. 333-208544)
3.2		Bylaws of NARC II (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of Form SF-3, dated December 14, 2015, and filed by the Depositor with the SEC on December 14, 2015, File No. 333-208544)
4.1		Indenture, dated as of April 14, 2015, by and between the Issuing Entity and U.S. Bank National Association, as indenture trustee (the “Indenture Trustee”) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of Form 8-K, dated April 14, 2015, File No. 333-183569-06)
10.1		Purchase Agreement, dated as of April 14, 2015, by and between NARC II, as purchaser, and Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation (“NMAC”), as seller (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Form 8-K, dated April 14, 2015, File No. 333-183569-06)
10.2		Sale and Servicing Agreement, dated as of April 14, 2015, by and among the Issuing Entity, NARC II, as seller, and NMAC, as servicer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Form 8-K, dated April 14, 2015, File No. 333-183569-06)
10.3		Administration Agreement, dated as of April 14, 2015, by and among the Issuing Entity, NMAC, as administrator, the Indenture Trustee and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as owner trustee (the “Owner Trustee”) (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of Form 8-K, dated April 14, 2015, File No. 333-183569-06)
10.4		Amended and Restated Trust Agreement, dated as of April 14, 2015, by and between the Depositor and the Owner Trustee (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 of Form 8-K, dated April 14, 2015, File No. 333-183569-06)
10.5		Amendment to Sale and Servicing Agreements, dated as of March 27, 2018, between NARC II, as seller, and NMAC, as servicer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of Form 10-D, dated March 29, 2018, File No. 333-183569-06)
31.1		Certification of Senior Officer in Charge of the Servicing Function of the Servicer Pursuant to Rule 15d-14(d)
33.1		Report on Assessment of Compliance With Applicable Servicing Criteria for Asset-Backed Securities of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation
33.2		Management’s Assertion on Compliance With Regulation AB (Wells Fargo Bank, National Association)
34.1		Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP)
34.2		Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (KPMG LLP)
35.1		Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation



33.1		Report on Assessment of Compliance With Applicable Servicing Criteria for Asset-Backed Securities of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation

33.2		Management’s Assertion on Compliance With Regulation AB (Wells Fargo Bank, National Association)

34.1		Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Ernst & Young LLP)

34.2		Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (KPMG LLP)

35.1		Servicer Compliance Statement of Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation

Item 16. Form 10-K Summary.

Not applicable.

SUBSTITUTE INFORMATION PROVIDED IN ACCORDANCE

WITH GENERAL INSTRUCTION J(2) TO FORM 10-K:

Item 1112(b) of Regulation AB. Significant Obligors of Pool Assets.

Nothing to report.

Items 1114(b)(2) of Regulation AB. Credit Enhancement and Other Support, Except for Certain Derivatives Instruments.

Nothing to report.

Items 1115(b) of Regulation AB. Certain Derivatives Instruments.

Nothing to report.

Item 1117 of Regulation AB. Legal Proceedings.

Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, the indenture trustee, has provided the information contained in the following ~~four~~paragraph ~~paragraphs~~ for purposes of compliance with Regulation AB.

OnSince June 18, 2014, a group of institutional investors have filed a civil ~~complaint~~complaints in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, New York County, and later the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., (“Wells Fargo Bank”) in its capacity as trustee ~~under~~for ~~276~~certain residential mortgage backed securities (“RMBS”) trusts. The complaints against Wells Fargo Bank alleged that the trustee caused losses to investors and asserted causes of action based upon, ~~which~~among ~~was~~other things, ~~later~~the ~~amended~~trustee’s onalleged ~~July~~failure to: (i) 18notify and enforce repurchase obligations of mortgage loan sellers for purported breaches of representations and warranties, ~~2014~~(ii) notify investors of alleged events of default, and (iii) abide by appropriate standards of care following alleged events of default. Relief sought included money damages in an unspecified amount, reimbursement of expenses, and equitable relief. Wells Fargo Bank has reached an agreement, in which it denies any wrongdoing, to ~~increase~~resolve these claims on a classwide basis for the ~~number~~271 ofRMBS trusts currently at issue. The settlement agreement is subject to ~~284~~court approval. Separate lawsuits against Wells Fargo Bank making similar allegations filed by certain other institutional investors concerning 57 RMBS trusts in New York federal and state court are not covered by the agreement. With respect to the foregoing litigations, Wells Fargo Bank believes plaintiffs’ claims are without merit and intends to contest the claims vigorously, but there can be no assurances as to the outcome of the litigations or the possible impact of the litigations on Wells Fargo Bank or the RMBS trusts.

~~On November 24,~~4 2014, the plaintiffs filed a motion to voluntarily dismiss the state court action without prejudice. That same day, a group of institutional investors filed a putative class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “District Court”) against Wells Fargo Bank, alleging claims against the bank in its capacity as trustee for 274 RMBS trusts (the “Federal Court Complaint”). In December 2014, the plaintiffs’ motion to voluntarily dismiss their original state court action was granted. As with the prior state court action, the Federal Court Complaint is one of six similar complaints filed contemporaneously against RMBS trustees (Deutsche Bank, Citibank, HSBC, Bank of New York Mellon and US Bank) by a group of institutional investor plaintiffs. The Federal Court Complaint against Wells Fargo Bank alleges that the trustee caused losses to investors and asserts causes of action based upon, among other things, the trustee’s alleged

failure to: (i) notify and enforce repurchase obligations of mortgage loan sellers for purported breaches of representations and warranties, (ii) notify investors of alleged events of default, and (iii) abide by appropriate standards of care following alleged events of default. Relief sought includes money damages in an unspecified amount, reimbursement of expenses, and equitable relief. Other cases alleging similar causes of action have been filed against Wells Fargo Bank and other trustees in the District Court by RMBS investors in these and other transactions, and these cases against Wells Fargo Bank are proceeding before the same District Court judge. A similar complaint was also filed May 27, 2016 in New York state court by a different plaintiff investor. On January 19, 2016, an order was entered in connection with the Federal Court Complaint in which the District Court declined to exercise jurisdiction over 261 trusts at issue in the Federal Court Complaint; the District Court also allowed plaintiffs to file amended complaints as to the remaining, non-dismissed trusts, if they so chose, and three amended complaints have been filed. On December 17, 2016, the investor plaintiffs in the 261 trusts dismissed from the Federal Court Complaint filed a new complaint in New York state court (the “State Court Complaint”).

In September 2017, Royal Park Investments SA/NV (“Royal Park”), one of the plaintiffs in the District Court cases against Wells Fargo Bank, filed a putative class action complaint relating to two trusts seeking declaratory and injunctive relief and money damages based on Wells Fargo Bank’s indemnification from trust funds for legal fees and expenses Wells Fargo Bank incurs or has incurred in defending the District Court case filed by Royal Park.

With respect to the foregoing litigations, Wells Fargo Bank believes plaintiffs’ claims are without merit and intends to contest the claims vigorously, but there can be no assurances as to the outcome of the litigations or the possible impact of the litigations on Wells Fargo Bank or the RMBS trusts.

Item 1119 of Regulation AB. Affiliations and Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.

Information required by Item 1119 of Regulation AB has been omitted from this report on Form 10-K in reliance on the Instruction to Item 1119.

Item 1122 of Regulation AB. Compliance with applicable Servicing Criteria.

Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation (the “Servicer”) and the Indenture Trustee (collectively, the “Servicing Parties”) have each been identified by the registrant as parties participating in the servicing function with respect to the asset pool held by the Issuing Entity. Each of the Servicing Parties has completed a report on an assessment of compliance with the servicing criteria set forth in paragraph (d) of Item 1122 of Regulation AB applicable to it (each, a “Servicing Assessment Report”), which Servicing Assessment Reports are attached as exhibits to this Form 10-K. In addition, each of the Servicing Parties has provided an attestation report (each, an “Attestation Report”) by a registered public accounting firm, which Attestation Reports are also attached as exhibits to this Form 10-K.

The Servicing Assessment Report and the related Attestation Report completed with respect to the Indenture Trustee do not identify any material instance of noncompliance with the servicing criteria applicable to the Indenture Trustee.

The Servicing Assessment Report for the Servicer and the related Attestation Report have identified a material ~~instance~~instances of noncompliance ~~related~~ ~~to the servicing criterion set forth in Item 1122(d)(4)(vi)—changes with respect to the terms or status of an obligor’s pool asset (e.g., loan modifications or re-agings) were not made,~~for ~~reviewed and approved by authorized personnel in accordance with~~ the ~~transaction~~2018 ~~agreements~~fiscal ~~and related pool asset documents~~year. ~~This material instance of noncompliance may relate to the receivables underlying the asset-backed securities covered in this Form 10-K and issued by the Issuer.~~

3Item 1122(d)(2)(i)

~~Under~~The ~~the~~Servicing ~~transaction~~Assessment ~~agreements~~Report for ~~retail~~the Servicer and ~~lease~~the ~~asset-backed~~related ~~securities~~Attestation inReport ~~transactions included~~have inidentified ~~the~~a ~~assessed~~material ~~retail~~instance ~~and~~of ~~lease~~noncompliance related ~~contract~~to the servicing ~~platform~~criterion ~~(the~~set ~~“Platform”),~~forth ~~extensions~~in ofItem ~~receivables~~1122(d)(2)(i)—payments ~~and~~on ~~lease~~pool ~~contracts~~assets are ~~required~~deposited tointo ~~be made in accordance with~~ the ~~Servicer’s~~appropriate ~~customary~~custodial ~~servicing~~bank ~~practices.~~accounts ~~Certain extensions~~and ~~for~~related ~~receivables~~bank ~~and~~clearing ~~lease~~accounts ~~contracts~~no ~~were~~more ~~not~~than ~~approved~~two bybusiness anday ~~employee~~ of ~~the~~receipt, ~~Servicer~~or ~~with~~such ~~the~~other number ~~appropriate level~~ of ~~authority~~days ~~and~~specified ~~certain~~in ~~receivables~~the ~~and~~transaction ~~lease~~agreements. ~~contracts~~This ~~received~~material ~~duplicate~~instance ~~extensions~~of onnoncompliance ~~the~~relates ~~same day due~~ to the ~~processing of~~receivables ~~duplicate~~underlying ~~service~~the ~~requests,~~asset-backed insecurities ~~each~~covered ~~case, not~~ in ~~accordance~~this ~~with~~Form 10-K and issued by the ~~Servicer’s~~Issuing ~~customary servicing practices~~Entity.

~~The~~Under ~~Servicer~~the ~~has corrected~~transaction ~~internal~~agreements ~~procedures~~for toretail ~~ensure~~and ~~that~~lease ~~all~~asset-backed ~~extensions~~securities ~~are~~in ~~made~~transactions included in ~~accordance~~the assessed ~~with~~retail ~~the~~and ~~Servicer’s~~lease ~~customary~~contract servicing ~~practices~~platform as(the ~~specified~~“Platform”), inthe Servicer is required to remit to the ~~transaction~~collection ~~agreements.~~account ~~The~~all ~~Servicer~~collections ~~has~~with ~~concluded~~respect ~~that~~to ~~the~~a ~~identified~~receivable ~~material~~or ~~instance~~lease ~~of non-compliance~~contract, ~~did~~as applicable, not ~~result~~later inthan ~~any~~the ~~material~~second business ~~adverse~~day ~~effect~~after onidentification ~~noteholders~~thereof. orHowever, ~~change~~a ~~the~~single ~~amount~~monthly ordeposit ~~timing~~is ofpermitted ~~payments~~if certain requirements are met, including a ratings threshold with respect to ~~noteholders~~the Servicer (the “monthly remittance condition”).

Under the transaction agreements for the transactions included in the Platform the monthly remittance condition was satisfied for the April 2018 through September 2018 collection periods and the Servicer remitted a single monthly deposit of collections to the collection account in accordance with the terms of the transaction agreements. During the October collection period the monthly remittance condition was no longer satisfied for certain transactions in the Platform and the Servicer continued to remit a single monthly deposit of collections to the collection account for the October 2018 through March 2019 collection periods. After discovery by an officer of the Servicer that the monthly remittance condition was no longer satisfied, the Servicer began remitting all collections to the collection account not later than the second business day after identification thereof and continues to do so.

The Servicer has concluded that the identified material instance of noncompliance did not result in any material adverse effect on noteholders.

Item 1122(d)(4)(xiv)

The Servicing Assessment Report for the Servicer and the related Attestation Report identified an additional material instance of noncompliance related to the servicing criterion set forth in Item 1122(d)(4)(xiv) – delinquencies, charge-offs and uncollectable accounts are recognized and recorded in accordance with the transaction agreements. This material instance of noncompliance relates to the receivables underlying the asset-backed securities covered in this Form 10-K and issued by the Issuing Entity.

Under the transaction agreements for retail and lease asset-backed securities in transactions included in the Platform, a receivable or lease contract, as applicable, is required to be classified as a “defaulted receivable” or “defaulted lease”, respectively, for purposes of the transaction agreements when, among other things, such receivable or lease contract is delinquent beyond a specified number of days or when the Servicer has determined in accordance with its customary servicing practices that eventual payment in full is unlikely (i.e., charged-off). In certain circumstances, receivables and lease contracts were not charged-off in accordance with the Servicer’s customary servicing practices and in other circumstances, receivables and lease contracts were not classified as “defaulted receivables” or “defaulted leases”, respectively, for purposes of the transaction agreements when the applicable receivable or lease contract was delinquent beyond the specified number of days.

The Servicer has supplemented internal procedures and implemented additional oversight to ensure that receivables and lease contracts are charged-off in accordance with the Servicer’s customary servicing practices and classified as a “defaulted receivable” or “defaulted lease”, respectively, for purposes of the transaction agreements when such receivable or lease contract is delinquent beyond the number of days specified in the applicable transaction agreements.

The Servicer has concluded that the identified material instance of noncompliance did not result in any material adverse effect on noteholders.

Item 1123 of Regulation AB. Servicer Compliance Statement.

The Servicer has provided a statement of compliance for the reporting period, signed by an authorized officer. The Compliance Statement is attached as an exhibit to this Form 10-K.

Supplemental information to be furnished with Reports Filed Pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act by Registrants which have not Registered Securities Pursuant to Section 12 of the Act.

No annual report, proxy statement, form of proxy or other proxy soliciting material has been sent to securityholders, and the registrant does not presently contemplate sending any such materials subsequent to the filing of this annual report on Form 10-K.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


NISSAN AUTO RECEIVABLES 2015-A OWNER TRUST

By:	Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation, Servicer

	By:	/s/ Kevin J. Cullum
		Kevin J. Cullum
		President and Chief Executive Officer (senior officer in charge of servicing function)

Date: ~~June~~ 29June 28, ~~2018~~2019

6S-1

Filing Compare · Nissan Auto Receivables 2015-A Owner Trust