(c)Table NONE.of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number 333-107830-05

BIG HEART PET BRANDS

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware

75-3064217

(State or Other Jurisdiction of

Incorporation or Organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

One Maritime Plaza,

San Francisco, California 94111

(Address of Principal Executive Offices including Zip Code)

(415) 247-3000

(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ¨ No x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

The number of shares outstanding of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01, as of close of business on ~~December~~February 527, ~~2014~~2015 was 10.

LOGO

BIG HEART PET BRANDS

For the Three and ~~Six~~Nine Months Ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015

Table of Contents

PART I.	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	1
ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	1
	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS – October 26, 2014 (unaudited) and April 27, 2014	1
	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS – January 25, 2015 (unaudited) and April 27, 2014	1
	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited) – three and six months ended October 26, 2014 and October 27, 2013	2
	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited) – three and nine months ended January 25, 2015 and January 26, 2014	2
	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (unaudited) – three and six months ended October 26, 2014 and October 27, 2013	3
	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (unaudited) – three and nine months ended January 25, 2015 and January 26, 2014	3
	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited) – six months ended October 26, 2014 and October 27, 2013	4
	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited) – nine months ended January 25, 2015 and January 26, 2014	4
	NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (unaudited)	5
ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	18
ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	2930
ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	3132
PART II.	OTHER INFORMATION	3233
ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	3233
ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	3233
ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	3334
ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	3335
ITEM 4.	MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES	3335
ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION	3335
ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS	3436
	SIGNATURES	3537

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

BIG HEART PET BRANDS AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in millions, except share and per share data)

	October 26,2014				April 27,2014
			January 25,2015					April 27,2014
	~~(unaudited)~~		(unaudited)		~~(derived from auditedfinancial statements) See Note 1~~			(derived from auditedfinancial statements)See Note 1
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	~~73.7~~		155.8	$	~~112.8~~	$		112.8
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance		~~142.2~~		146.4		~~127.2~~			127.2
Inventories, net		~~223.4~~		213.6		~~227.5~~			227.5
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		~~133.6~~		118.7		~~164.3~~			164.3
Total current assets		~~572.9~~		634.5		~~631.8~~			631.8
Property, plant and equipment, net		~~372.3~~		363.6		~~375.4~~			375.4
Goodwill		~~2,113.4~~		2,113.4		~~2,113.4~~			2,113.4
Intangible assets, net		~~2,131.6~~		2,119.8		~~2,155.2~~			2,155.2
Other assets, net		~~89.7~~		89.6		~~87.8~~			87.8
Total assets	$	~~5,279.9~~		5,320.9	$	~~5,363.6~~	$		5,363.6
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	~~289.7~~		291.8	$	~~367.8~~	$		367.8
Current portion of long-term debt		~~17.3~~		17.3		~~17.3~~			17.3
Total current liabilities		~~307.0~~		309.1		~~385.1~~			385.1
Long-term debt, net of discount		~~2,594.5~~		2,590.4		~~2,603.0~~			2,603.0
Deferred tax liabilities		~~782.8~~		790.7		~~792.1~~			792.1
Other non-current liabilities		~~85.3~~		75.1		~~95.3~~			95.3
Total liabilities		~~3,769.6~~		3,765.3		~~3,875.5~~			3,875.5
Stockholder’s equity:
Common stock ($0.01 par value per share, shares authorized:
1,000; 10 issued and outstanding)		-		-		-			-
Additional paid-in capital		~~1,593.5~~		1,595.7		~~1,589.6~~			1,589.6
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		(2.5	)			8.4
Accumulated other comprehensive income				7.6					8.4
Retained earnings (accumulated deficit)		~~(80.7~~	)	(47.7)		~~(109.9~~	)		(109.9)
Total stockholder’s equity		~~1,510.3~~		1,555.6		~~1,488.1~~			1,488.1
Total liabilities and stockholder’s equity	$	~~5,279.9~~		5,320.9	$	~~5,363.6~~	$		5,363.6

See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

BIG HEART PET BRANDS AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)

(in millions)

	~~Three Months Ended~~		Three Months Ended					~~Six Months Ended~~					Nine Months Ended
	October 26, 2014				October 27, 2013			October 26, 2014			October 27, 2013
			January 25,2015					January 26,2014					January 25,2015			January 26,2014
Net sales	$	~~565.5~~		589.9	$	~~552.0~~	$	$	~~1,095~~575.27		$	~~1,033.0~~		1,685.1	$		1,608.7
Cost of products sold		~~372.3~~		374.4		~~355.7~~			~~714~~368.35			~~657.8~~		1,088.7			1,026.3
Gross profit		~~193.2~~		215.5		~~196.3~~			~~380~~207.92			~~375.2~~		596.4			582.4
Selling, general and administrative expense		~~124.6~~		111.0		~~124.5~~			~~256~~124.68			~~237.2~~		367.6			362.0
Operating income		~~68.6~~		104.5		~~71.8~~			~~124~~82.34			~~138.0~~		228.8			220.4
Interest expense		~~35.3~~		35.2		~~58.8~~			7058.54			~~118.4~~		105.7			176.8
Other (income) expense, net		~~4.5~~		12.7		~~(1.2~~	)		7(0.2)			~~(9.6~~	)	19.9			(9.8)
Income from continuing operations before income taxes		~~28.8~~		56.6		~~14.2~~			4624.62			~~29.2~~		103.2			53.4
Provision for income taxes		~~11.1~~		23.2		~~8.0~~			178.76			~~16.4~~		40.9			25.0
Income from continuing operations		~~17.7~~		33.4		~~6.2~~			2815.96			~~12.8~~		62.3			28.4
Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes		~~0.3~~		(0.3)		~~(162.2~~	)		(437.63	)		~~(142.7~~	)	(5.1)			(105.4)
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		~~0.1~~		0.1		~~(63.3~~	)		(418.97	)		~~(57.1~~	)	(5.0)			(38.4)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		~~0.2~~		(0.4)		~~(98.9~~	)		018.36			~~(85.6~~	)	(0.1)			(67.0)
Net income (loss)	$	~~17.9~~		33.0	$	~~(92.7~~	)$	$	2934.2		$	~~(72.8~~	)	62.2	$		(38.6)

See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

BIG HEART PET BRANDS AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (unaudited)

(in millions)

	~~Three Months Ended~~		Three Months Ended					~~Six Months Ended~~					Nine Months Ended
	October 26, 2014				October 27, 2013			October 26, 2014			October 27, 2013
			January 25,2015					January 26,2014					January 25,2015			January 26,2014
Net income (loss)	$	~~17.9~~		33.0	$	~~(92.7~~	)$	$	2934.2		$	~~(72.8~~	)	62.2	$		(38.6)
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustments		-		-		~~(0.2~~	)		-(1.2)			~~(0.3~~	)	-			(1.5)
Pension and other postretirement benefits adjustments:
Prior service (cost) credit arising during the period, net of tax		~~(0.1~~	)	6.8		~~(0.2~~	)		(0.12)			~~(0.4~~	)	6.9			(0.6)
Gain (loss) on cash flow hedging instruments, net of tax		~~(1.1~~	)	3.3		~~0.2~~			~~(11~~1.04	)		~~1.3~~		(7.7)			2.7
Total other comprehensive income (loss)		~~(1.2~~	)	10.1		~~(0.2~~	)		~~(10~~0.90	)		~~0.6~~		(0.8)			0.6
Comprehensive income (loss)	$	~~16.7~~		43.1	$	~~(92.9~~	)$	$	1834.32		$	~~(72.2~~	)	61.4	$		(38.0)

See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

BIG HEART PET BRANDS AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)

(in millions)

	Six Months Ended
			Nine Months Ended
	October 26, 2014				October 27, 2013
			January 25,2015					January 26,2014
Operating activities:
Net income (loss)	$	~~29.2~~		62.2	$	~~(72.8~~	)$		(38.6)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		~~48.8~~		74.5		~~74.5~~			102.3
Deferred taxes		~~(5.7~~	)	(3.9)		~~(61.1~~	)		(62.3)
Write off of debt issuance costs		-		-		~~1.7~~			1.7
Loss on asset disposals		~~0.8~~		1.3		~~1.1~~			3.7
Stock compensation expense		~~4.9~~		7.3		~~6.5~~			11.8
Unrealized (gain) loss on derivative financial instruments		~~10.1~~		23.0		~~(22.6~~	)		(25.1)
Impairment on assets held for sale		-		-		~~193.8~~			193.8
Other items, net		~~1.6~~		(1.2)		~~(0.6~~	)		(0.6)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities		~~(96.1~~	)	(69.8)		~~(383.6~~	)		(263.4)
Net cash used in operating activities		(6.4	)			(263.1	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities				93.4					(76.7)
Investing activities:
Capital expenditures		~~(26.0~~	)	(38.6)		~~(47.6~~	)		(64.5)
Net proceeds from asset disposals		~~9.1~~		9.1		~~0.1~~			0.2
Cash used in business acquisition, net of cash acquired		-		-		~~(335.0~~	)		(334.6)
Investments in equity method investees		~~(6.0~~	)	(7.6)		~~(14.6~~	)		(14.6)
Net cash used in investing activities		(22.9	)			(397.1	)
Other items, net				(0.2)					-
Financing activities:
Net cash used in investing activities				(37.3)					(413.5)
Proceeds from short-term borrowings		-				225.3
Financing activities:
Payments on short-term borrowings		-				(70.1	)
Proceeds from short-term borrowings				-					239.9
Principal payments on long-term debt		(8.6	)			(74.5	)
Payments on short-term borrowings				-					(240.9)
Payments of debt related costs		(0.2	)			-
Principal payments on long-term debt				(13.0)					(74.5)
Capital contributions		-				0.1
Payments of debt related costs				(0.2)					-
Return of capital to Parent		(0.8	)			-
Capital contributions				-					0.7
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(9.6	)			80.8
Net cash used in financing activities				(13.2)					(74.8)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		~~(0.2~~	)	0.1		~~0.8~~			(0.1)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		~~(39.1~~	)	43.0		~~(578.6~~	)		(565.1)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		~~112.8~~		112.8		~~594.2~~			594.2
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	~~73.7~~		155.8	$	~~15.6~~	$		29.1

See accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

BIG HEART PET BRANDS AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015

(unaudited)

Note 1. Business and Basis of Presentation

On March 8, 2011, Del Monte Foods Company (“DMFC”) was acquired by an investor group led by funds affiliated with Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P. (“KKR”), Vestar Capital Partners (“Vestar”) and Centerview Capital, L.P. (“Centerview,” and together with KKR and Vestar, the “Sponsors”). The acquisition (also referred to as the “Merger”) was effected by the merger of Blue Merger Sub Inc. (“Blue Sub”) with and into DMFC, with DMFC being the surviving corporation. As a result of the Merger, DMFC became a wholly-owned subsidiary of Blue Acquisition Group, Inc. (“Parent”). Del Monte Corporation (“DMC,” together with its consolidated subsidiaries, “Del Monte”) was a direct, wholly-owned subsidiary of DMFC. On April 26, 2011, DMFC merged with and into DMC, with DMC being the surviving corporation. In connection with the sale of the Consumer Products Business (see Note 1 of the 2014 Annual Report (defined below)) on February 18, 2014, DMC changed its name to Big Heart Pet Brands (together with its consolidated subsidiaries, “Big Heart Pet” or the “Company”).

The Company operates on a 52 or 53-week fiscal year ending on the Sunday closest to April 30. The results of operations for the three months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~October~~January 2726, ~~2013~~2014 each reflect periods that contain 13 weeks. The results of operations for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~ January 2625, ~~2014~~ 2015 and ~~October~~January 2726, ~~2013~~2014 each reflect periods that contain 2639 weeks.

Big Heart Pet ~~Brands~~ is the largest U.S. standalone producer, distributor and marketer of premium quality, branded pet food and pet snacks. The Company’s pet food and pet snacks brands include well-known household brands such as Meow Mix, Milk-Bone, Kibbles ‘n Bits, 9Lives, Natural Balance, Pup-Peroni, Gravy Train, Nature’s Recipe, Canine Carry Outs, Milo’s Kitchen and other brand names. The Company has one operating segment: Pet Products, which manufactures, markets and sells branded and private label dry and wet pet food and pet snacks.

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 and for the three and ~~six~~nine months ~~ended~~ ~~October~~ended January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~October~~January 2726, ~~2013~~2014 have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by GAAP for annual financial statements. These unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the notes to the consolidated financial statements in the Company’s 2014 Annual Report on Form 10-K (“2014 Annual Report”). In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of normal and recurring entries considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented have been included. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts in the financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates are based on information available as of the date of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. Therefore, actual results could differ from those estimates. Furthermore, operating results for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the fiscal year ending May 3, 2015 (“fiscal 2015”). The Company’s income from continuing operations and income (loss) from discontinued operations were increased by $2.7 million and $2.6 million, respectively, for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 as a result of adjustments related to prior periods that were not deemed material to prior year results or to expected results for fiscal 2015.

The results of the former Consumer Products Business have been reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Expenses allocated to discontinued operations are limited to selling, administrative and distribution expenses that were directly attributable to the Consumer Products Business in accordance with the terms of the purchase agreement. Consequently, certain expenses that have historically been allocated to the Consumer Products segment are not included in discontinued operations. The Company has combined cash flows from discontinued operations with cash flows from continuing operations within the operating, investing and financing categories in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for all periods presented. Cash flows are not comparable year over year due to the sale of the Consumer Products Business.

As of ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015, the Company had recorded a gross receivable of $16.3 million for the working capital adjustment related to the sale of the Consumer Products Business. In June 2014, the Company received a Notice of Disagreement from the Acquiror disputing the $16.3 million working capital adjustment presented by the Company as well as the incremental preliminary working capital adjustment of approximately $110 million paid by the Acquiror at closing on February 18, 2014. The purchase agreement specifies that such working capital disputes are to be submitted to and resolved by a mutually agreed upon independent certified public accounting firm in the United States of national recognition. The Company believes that the working capital adjustment presented to the Acquiror is appropriate, is in accordance with the terms of the purchase agreement and plans to vigorously defend its position. However, the Company cannot currently predict the ultimate outcome of this dispute.

Net sales from discontinued operations were $0.0 million for the three and six months ended October 26, 2014, respectively, and $462.8 million and $805.7 million for the three and six months ended October 27, 2013, respectively. Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes was $0.3 million and $(4.6) million for the three and six months ended October 26, 2014 and $(162.2) million and $(142.7) million for the three and six months ended October 27, 2013, respectively. All subsequent footnote disclosures represent continuing operations.

BIG HEART PET BRANDS AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 26~~January 25, ~~2014~~2015

(unaudited)

Net sales from discontinued operations were $0.0 million for the three and nine months ended January 25, 2015 and $423.2 million and $1,228.9 million for the three and nine months ended January 26, 2014, respectively. Income (loss) from discontinued operations before income taxes was $(0.3) million and $(5.1) million for the three and nine months ended January 25, 2015 and $37.3 million and $(105.4) million for the three and nine months ended January 26, 2014, respectively. All subsequent footnote disclosures represent continuing operations.

Note 2. Recently Issued Accounting Standards

InExcept as ~~August~~set ~~2014~~forth below, ~~the~~there ~~Financial~~have ~~Accounting~~been ~~Standards~~no ~~Board~~material ~~issued~~developments ~~an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) which provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going-concern uncertainties~~ in ~~financial~~recently ~~statements.~~issued ~~The new~~ accounting ~~standard~~standards ~~requires~~potentially ~~management~~impacting tothe ~~perform interim and annual assessments of an entity~~Company’s ~~ability~~consolidated ~~to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the~~ financial statements ~~are~~since ~~issued.~~those ~~This~~reported ~~ASU~~in ~~is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance and~~ the ~~impact~~2014 itAnnual ~~may have on its interim and annual consolidated financial statements~~Report.

In January 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) which provides guidance on the elimination of the concept of extraordinary items under GAAP. This ASU is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance and the impact it may have on its interim and annual consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued an ASU which provides consolidation guidance and changes the way reporting enterprises evaluate consolidation for limited partnerships, investment companies and similar entities, as well as variable interest entities. The ASU is effective for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company is currently evaluating this guidance and the impact it may have on its interim and annual consolidated financial statements.

BIG HEART PET BRANDS AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 26~~January 25, ~~2014~~2015

(unaudited)

Note 3. Supplemental Financial Statement Information

	October 26, 2014				April 27, 2014
			January 25,2015					April 27,2014
	~~(in millions)~~		(in millions)
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance:
Trade	$	~~142.2~~		146.4	$	~~127.2~~	$		127.2
Allowance for doubtful accounts		-		-		-			-
Total	$	~~142.2~~		146.4	$	~~127.2~~	$		127.2
Inventories, net:
Finished products	$	~~185.8~~		179.3	$	~~191.5~~	$		191.5
Raw materials and in-process materials		~~25.0~~		23.0		~~24.5~~			24.5
Packaging materials and other		~~12.6~~		11.3		~~11.5~~			11.5
Total	$	~~223.4~~		213.6	$	~~227.5~~	$		227.5
Prepaid expenses and other current assets:
Prepaid taxes	$	~~52.4~~		32.7	$	~~57.3~~	$		57.3
Other prepaid expenses		~~27.9~~		25.8		~~36.1~~			36.1
Other current assets		~~53.3~~		60.2		~~70.9~~			70.9
Total	$	~~133.6~~		118.7	$	~~164.3~~	$		164.3
Property, plant and equipment, net:
Land and land improvements	$	~~12.3~~		8.5	$	~~12.4~~	$		12.4
Buildings and leasehold improvements		~~126.8~~		120.1		~~123.3~~			123.3
Machinery and equipment		~~267.6~~		272.7		~~256.8~~			256.8
Computers and software		~~62.5~~		62.3		~~58.8~~			58.8
Construction in progress		~~33.8~~		39.9		~~35.8~~			35.8
		503.0				487.1
				503.5					487.1
Accumulated depreciation		~~(130.7~~	)	(139.9)		~~(111.7~~	)		(111.7)
Total	$	~~372.3~~		363.6	$	~~375.4~~	$		375.4
Accounts payable and accrued expenses:
Accounts payable-trade	$	~~150.7~~		132.2	$	~~175.9~~	$		175.9
Marketing, advertising and trade promotion		~~49.0~~		49.1		~~67.6~~			67.6
Accrued benefits, payroll and related costs		~~30.5~~		33.8		~~37.3~~			37.3
Accrued interest		~~20.9~~		37.9		~~21.2~~			21.2
Other current liabilities		~~38.6~~		38.8		~~65.8~~			65.8
Total	$	~~289.7~~		291.8	$	~~367.8~~	$		367.8
Other non-current liabilities:
Accrued postretirement benefits	$	~~29.2~~		17.8	$	~~29.8~~	$		29.8
Pension liability		~~20.0~~		21.8		~~17.1~~			17.1
Other non-current liabilities		~~36.1~~		35.5		~~48.4~~			48.4
Total	$	~~85.3~~		75.1	$	~~95.3~~	$		95.3
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
Accumulated other comprehensive income:
Pension and other postretirement benefits adjustments, net of tax	$	~~6.1~~		12.9	$	~~6.0~~	$		6.0
Income (loss) on cash flow hedging instruments, net of tax		~~(8.6~~	)	(5.3)		~~2.4~~			2.4
Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	$	(2.5	)		$	8.4
Total accumulated other comprehensive income	$			7.6			$		8.4

BIG HEART PET BRANDS AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 26~~January 25, ~~2014~~2015

(unaudited)

Note 4. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The following table presents the Company’s goodwill and intangible assets (in millions):

	October 26, 2014				April 27, 2014
			January 25,2015					April 27,2014
Goodwill	$	~~2,113.4~~		2,113.4	$	~~2,113.4~~	$		2,113.4
Non-amortizable intangible assets:
Trademarks	$	~~1,389.9~~		1,389.9	$	~~1,389.9~~	$		1,389.9
Amortizable intangible assets:
Trademarks		~~39.3~~		39.3		~~39.3~~			39.3
Customer relationships		~~852.7~~		852.7		~~852.7~~			852.7
		~~892.0~~		892.0		~~892.0~~			892.0
Accumulated amortization		~~(150.3~~	)	(162.1	)	~~(126.7~~	)		(126.7	)
Amortizable intangible assets, net		~~741.7~~		729.9		~~765.3~~			765.3
Total intangible assets, net	$	~~2,131.6~~		2,119.8	$	~~2,155.2~~	$		2,155.2

Amortization expense for the periods indicated below was as follows (in millions):

~~Three Months Ended~~

Three Months Ended

~~Six Months Ended~~

Nine Months Ended

October 26, 2014

October 27, 2013

October 26, 2014

October 27, 2013

January 25,2015

January 26,2014

January 25,2015

January 26,2014

Amortization expense

~~11.8~~

11.8

~~11.8~~

2311.68

~~21.6~~

35.4

33.4

As of ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015, expected amortization of intangible assets for each of the five succeeding fiscal years and thereafter is as follows (in millions):

2015 (remainder)	$	~~23.7~~	11.9
2016		~~47.1~~	47.1
2017		~~46.7~~	46.7
2018		~~46.7~~	46.7
2019		~~46.7~~	46.7
2020 and thereafter		~~530.8~~	530.8

Note 5. Derivative Financial Instruments

The Company uses interest rate swaps, commodity swaps, futures, option and swaption (an option on a swap) contracts as well as foreign currency forward contracts, to hedge market risks relating to possible adverse changes in interest rates, commodity, transportation, and foreign currency exchange rates and other input price exposures. The Company continually monitors its positions and the credit ratings of the counterparties involved to mitigate the amount of credit exposure to any one party.

The Company designates each derivative contract as one of the following: (1) a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (“cash flow hedge”) or (2) a hedging instrument for which the change in fair value is recognized to act as an economic hedge but does not meet the requirements to receive hedge accounting treatment (“economic hedge”). As of ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015, the Company had both cash flow and economic hedges.

Interest Rates: The Company’s debt primarily consists of floating rate term loans and fixed rate notes. The Company maintains its floating rate revolver for flexibility and for other general corporate purposes. Interest expense on the Company’s floating rate debt is typically calculated based on a fixed spread over a reference rate, such as LIBOR (also known as the Eurodollar rate). Therefore, fluctuations in market interest rates will cause interest expense increases or decreases on a given amount of floating rate debt.

BIG HEART PET BRANDS AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 26~~January 25, ~~2014~~2015

(unaudited)

Interest Rates: The Company’s debt primarily consists of floating rate term loans and fixed rate notes. The Company maintains its floating rate revolver for flexibility and for other general corporate purposes. Interest expense on the Company’s floating rate debt is typically calculated based on a fixed spread over a reference rate, such as LIBOR (also known as the Eurodollar rate). Therefore, fluctuations in market interest rates will cause interest expense increases or decreases on a given amount of floating rate debt.

The Company from time to time manages a portion of its interest rate risk related to floating rate debt by entering into interest rate swaps in which the Company receives floating rate payments and makes fixed rate payments. Swaps are recorded as an asset or liability in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. The Company currently accounts for these interest rate swaps as economic hedges and gains and losses are recorded directly in earnings.

As of ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015, the following economic hedge swaps were outstanding:

Contract date

~~Notional amount (in millions)~~

(in millions)

~~Fixed LIBOR rate~~

Fixed LIBOR rate

~~Effective date~~

~~Maturity~~Effective date

Maturity date

April 12, 2011

~~900.0~~

900.0

~~3.029~~

3.029%

~~September 4, 2012~~

~~September 1, 2015~~

September 4, 2012

September 1, 2015

On August 13, 2010, the Company entered into interest rate swaps with a total notional amount of $300.0 million as the fixed rate payer and an effective date of February 1, 2011. The interest rate swaps fixed LIBOR at 1.368% for the term of the swaps and expired during fiscal 2014 on February 3, 2014.

Commodities: Certain commodities such as soybean meal, corn, wheat, soybean oil, diesel fuel and natural gas (collectively, “commodity contracts”) are used in the production and transportation of the Company’s products. Generally these commodities are purchased based upon market prices that are established with the vendor as part of the purchase process. The Company uses futures, swaps, swaption and option contracts, as deemed appropriate; to reduce the effect of price fluctuations on anticipated purchases. These contracts may have a term of up to 36 months. The Company accounts for these commodities derivatives as either economic or cash flow hedges. Changes in the value of economic hedges are recorded directly in earnings. For cash flow hedges, the effective portion of derivative gains and losses is deferred in equity and recognized as part of cost of products sold in the appropriate period and the ineffective portion is recognized as other (income) expense.

The table below presents the notional amounts of the Company’s commodity derivative contracts as of the dates indicated (in millions):

	October 26, 2014				April 27, 2014
			January 25,2015					April 27,2014
Commodity contracts	$	~~194.7~~		173.2	$	~~124.8~~	$		124.8

Foreign Currency: From time to time, the Company manages its exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates by entering into forward contracts to cover a portion of its projected expenditures paid in local currency. These contracts may have a term of up to 2436 months. The Company accounts for these contracts as either economic or cash flow hedges. Changes in the value of economic hedges are recorded directly in earnings. For cash flow hedges, the effective portion of derivative gains and losses is deferred in equity and recognized as part of cost of products sold in the appropriate period and the ineffective portion is recognized as other (income) expense.

The table below presents the notional amounts of the Company’s foreign currency derivative contracts as of the dates indicated (in millions). As of April 27, 2014, the Company did not have any outstanding foreign currency exchange contracts because the Company did not believe it was in its best interest at the time. All of the foreign currency derivative contracts held on ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 are scheduled to mature prior to the end of fiscal ~~2016~~2015.

	October 26, 2014				April 27, 2014
			January 25,2015					April 27,2014
Contract amount	$	~~13.4~~		6.5	$	-	$		-

BIG HEART PET BRANDS AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 26~~January 25, ~~2014~~2015

(unaudited)

Fair Value of Derivative Instruments

The fair value of derivative instruments recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 was as follows (in millions):

Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships

Asset derivatives

Liability derivatives

Derivatives in cash flowhedging relationships

Asset derivatives

Liability derivatives

Balance Sheet location

~~Fair value~~

Fair value

~~Balance Sheet location~~

~~Fair~~Balance ~~value~~Sheet location

Fair value

Interest rate contracts

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

~~Accounts payable and accrued expenses~~

$Accounts payable and accrued expenses

~~23.1~~

~~(1)~~$

16.7 (1)

Commodity and other contracts

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

~~0.1~~

~~Accounts payable and accrued expenses~~

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

~~16.2~~

~~(2)~~

21.7 (2)

Foreign currency exchange contracts

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

~~0.3~~

0.7

~~Accounts payable and accrued expenses~~

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

Total

~~0.4~~

0.7

~~39.3~~

38.4

⁽¹⁾	Represents liability derivatives designated as economic hedges.

(2) Includes $212.35 million of commodity contracts (liability derivatives) designated as economic hedges.

The fair value of derivative instruments recorded in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of April 27, 2014 was as follows (in millions):

Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships

Asset derivatives

Liability derivatives

Derivatives in cash flowhedging relationships

Asset derivatives

Liability derivatives

Balance Sheet location

~~Fair value~~

Fair value

~~Balance Sheet location~~

~~Fair~~Balance ~~value~~Sheet location

Fair value

Interest rate contracts

Other non-current assets

~~Other non-current liabilities~~

$Other non-current liabilities

~~9.8~~

~~(2)~~$

9.8 (2)

Interest rate contracts

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

~~Accounts payable and accrued expenses~~

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

~~25.4~~

~~(2)~~

25.4 (2)

Commodity and other contracts

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

~~9.4~~

~~(1)~~

9.4 (1)

~~Accounts payable and accrued expenses~~

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

Total

~~9.4~~

9.4

~~35.2~~

35.2

⁽¹⁾	Includes $1.8 million of commodity contracts (asset derivatives) designated as economic hedges.

⁽²⁾	Represents liability derivatives designated as economic hedges.

The effect of the Company’s economic hedges on other (income) expense, net in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the periods indicated below was as follows (in millions):


		Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
		January 25, 2015			January 26, 2014			January 25, 2015			January 26, 2014
Interest rate contracts	$		-	$		0.5	$		0.8	$		0.7
Commodity and other contracts			11.6			(1.7)			14.0			(10.0)

Included in other (income) expense, net	$		11.6	$		(1.2)	$		14.8	$		(9.3)

BIG HEART PET BRANDS AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 26~~January 25, ~~2014~~2015

(unaudited)

The effect of the Company’s ~~economic~~cash flow hedges ~~on other (income) expense, net~~ in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the ~~periods~~three ~~indicated~~and ~~below~~nine months ended January 25, 2015 was as follows (in millions):

	Three Months Ended								Six Months Ended
			(Gain) loss recognized inAOCI														(Gain) loss reclassifiedfrom AOCI into income					Location of (gain) loss recognized in income (ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing)		(Gain) loss recognizedin income (ineffectiveportion and amountexcluded fromeffectiveness testing)
	October 26, 2014				October 27, 2013				October 26, 2014				October 27, 2013
Derivatives in cash flowhedging relationships			ThreeMonthsEnded								NineMonthsEnded				Location of (gain)loss reclassified from AOCI		ThreeMonthsEnded			NineMonthsEnded				ThreeMonthsEnded			NineMonthsEnded
Interest rate contracts	$	0.8			$	2.1			$	0.8			$	0.2
			January 25,2015								January 25,2015						January 25,2015			January 25,2015				January 25,2015			January 25,2015
Commodity and other contracts	$	~~1.9~~		(5.0)		~~(1.7~~	)	$		~~2.4~~		13.0		~~(8.3~~	)Cost of products sold	$		2.3	$		5.4	Other (income) expense, net	$		(0.7)	$		2.8
Included in other (income) expense, net	$	2.7			$	0.4			$	3.2			$	(8.1	)
Foreign currency exchange contracts				(0.4)								(0.7)			Cost of products sold			(0.4)			(0.3)	Other (income) expense, net			-			-
Total	$			(5.4)				$				12.3				$		1.9	$		5.1		$		(0.7)	$		2.8

The effect of the Company’s cash flow hedges in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and ~~six~~ nine months ended ~~October~~January 26, 2014 was as follows (in millions):

Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships	(Gain) loss recognized in AOCI								Location of (gain) lossreclassified from AOCI	(Gain) loss reclassifiedfrom AOCI into income					Location of (gain) lossrecognized in income(ineffective portion andamount excluded fromeffectiveness testing)		(Gain) loss recognized inincome (ineffective portionand amount excludedfrom effectiveness testing)
			(Gain) loss recognized inAOCI									Location of (gain) loss reclassified from AOCI			(Gain) loss reclassifiedfrom AOCI into income							Location of (gain) loss recognized in income (ineffective portion and amount excluded from effectiveness testing)		(Gain) loss recognizedin income (ineffectiveportion and amountexcluded fromeffectiveness testing)
	Three MonthsEnded				Six MonthsEnded					Three MonthsEnded		Six MonthsEnded					Three MonthsEnded			Six MonthsEnded
Derivatives in cash flowhedging relationships			ThreeMonthsEnded							NineMonthsEnded					ThreeMonthsEnded					NineMonthsEnded				ThreeMonthsEnded			NineMonthsEnded
	October 26, 2014				October 26, 2014					October 26, 2014		October 26, 2014					October 26, 2014			October 26, 2014
			January 26,2014							January 26,2014					January 26,2014					January 26,2014				January 26,2014			January 26,2014
Commodity and other contracts	$	~~2.1~~		(2.6)	$	~~18.0~~		$	~~Cost of products sold~~	$	2(4.73)	$Cost of products sold	~~3.1~~	$	~~Other (income) expense, net~~	4.7	$	~~1.0~~	$	$	37.50	Other (income) expense, net	$		0.5	$		(1.1)
Foreign currency exchange contracts		(0.1	)			(0.2	)		Cost of products sold		-		0.1		Other (income) expense, net			-			-
Total	$			(2.6)				$			(4.3)			$		4.7			$		7.0		$		0.5	$		(1.1)
Total	$	2.0			$	17.8				$	2.7	$	3.2				$	1.0		$	3.5

~~The~~At ~~effect~~January 25, of2015, ~~the~~$7.2 ~~Company’s~~million ~~cash~~is ~~flow~~expected ~~hedges~~to inbe ~~the~~reclassified ~~Condensed~~from ~~Consolidated~~AOCI ~~Statements~~to cost of ~~Operations~~products ~~for~~sold within the ~~three~~next ~~and six~~12 months. ~~ended October 27, 2013 was as follows (in millions):~~

Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships	(Gain) loss recognized in AOCI						Location of (gain) lossreclassified from AOCI	(Gain) loss reclassifiedfrom AOCI into income				Location of (gain) lossrecognized in income(ineffective portion andamount excluded fromeffectiveness testing)	(Gain) loss recognized inincome (ineffective portionand amount excludedfrom effectiveness testing)
	Three MonthsEnded			Six MonthsEnded				Three MonthsEnded		Six MonthsEnded			Three MonthsEnded			Six MonthsEnded
	October 27, 2013			October 27, 2013				October 27, 2013		October 27, 2013			October 27, 2013			October 27, 2013
Commodity and other contracts	$	(1.6	)	$	(1.6	)	Cost of products sold	$	2.2	$	1.9	Other (income) expense, net	$	(1.3	)	$	(1.6	)
Foreign currency exchange contracts		-			-		Cost of products sold		-		-	Other (income) expense, net		-			-
Total	$	(1.6	)	$	(1.6	)		$	2.2	$	1.9		$	(1.3	)	$	(1.6	)

At October 26, 2014, $10.9 million is expected to be reclassified from AOCI to cost of products sold within the next 12 months.

Note 6. Fair Value Measurements

A three-tier fair value hierarchy is utilized to prioritize the inputs used in measuring fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels are defined as follows:

•

Level 1 Inputs—unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

•

Level 2 Inputs—quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly through market corroboration, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument; and

•

Level 3 Inputs—unobservable inputs reflecting the Company’s own assumptions in measuring the asset or liability at fair value.

The Company uses interest rate swaps, commodity contracts and forward foreign currency contracts to hedge market risks relating to possible adverse changes in interest rates, commodity prices, diesel fuel prices and foreign exchange rates.

BIG HEART PET BRANDS AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 26~~January 25, ~~2014~~2015

(unaudited)

The following table provides the fair value hierarchy for financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring basis (in millions):

	~~Level 1~~		Level 1					~~Level 2~~				Level 2		~~Level 3~~						Level 3
Description	~~October 26, 2014~~		January 25,2015		~~April 27, 2014~~			~~October~~April 2627, 2014		~~April 27, 2014~~		January 25,2015		~~October 26, 2014~~			April 27, 2014			January 25,2015			April 27,2014
Assets
Commodity and other contracts	$	~~0.1~~		-	$	~~7.5~~	$	$	-7.5	$	~~1.9~~		-	$	-	$	$	-1.9	$		-	$		-
Foreign currency exchange contracts		-		-		-			~~0.3~~-		-		0.7		-			-			-			-
Total	$	~~0.1~~		-		~~7.5~~	$		07.35	$	~~1.9~~		0.7		-	$		-1.9	$		-	$		-
Liabilities
Interest rate contracts	$	-		-		-	$		~~23.1~~-	$	~~35.2~~		16.7		-	$		-35.2	$		-	$		-
Commodity and other contracts		~~13.8~~		8.1		-			~~2.4~~-		-		13.6		-			-			-			-
Contingent consideration		-		-		-			-		-		-		~~2.2~~			~~3.1~~-			2.2			3.1
Total	$	~~13.8~~		8.1	$	-	$	$	~~25.5~~-	$	~~35.2~~		30.3	$	~~2.2~~	$	$	335.12	$		2.2	$		3.1

The Company’s determination of the fair value of its interest rate swaps was calculated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on the terms of the swap contracts and the observable interest rate curve. The Company’s futures and options contracts are traded on regulated exchanges such as the Chicago Board of Trade, Kansas City Board of Trade and the New York Mercantile Exchange. The Company values these contracts based on the daily settlement prices published by the exchanges on which the contracts are traded. The Company’s commodities swap and swaption contracts are traded over-the-counter and are valued based on the Chicago Board of Trade quoted prices for similar instruments in active markets or corroborated by observable market data available from the Energy Information Administration. The Company measures the fair value of foreign currency forward contracts using an income approach based on forward rates (obtained from market quotes for futures contracts with similar terms) less the contract rate multiplied by the notional amount. ~~There were no foreign currency forward contracts outstanding as of April 27, 2014.~~

The Company has classified contingent consideration as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy as it is based on unobservable inputs. Significant inputs and assumptions are management’s estimate of net sales using probability weighted estimates and the discount rate used to calculate the present value of the liability. Significant changes in any Level 3 input or assumption would result in increases or decreases to fair value measurements for contingent consideration. See Note 5 of the 2014 Annual Report for additional information.

The Company has both fixed and floating rate debt. The Company uses Level 2 inputs to estimate the fair value of such debt. As of ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015, the book value of the Company’s floating rate debt instruments approximates fair value. The following table provides the book value and the fair value of the Company’s fixed rate notes (“Senior Notes”) (in millions):

Senior Notes	~~October 26, 2014~~		January 25,2015		~~April 27, 2014~~			April 27,2014
Book value	$	~~900.0~~		900.0	$	~~900.0~~	$		900.0
Fair value	$	~~906.3~~		896.6	$	~~938.3~~	$		938.3

Fair value for both fixed and floating rate debt was estimated based on quoted market prices from the trading desk of a nationally recognized investment bank. As the Senior Notes are available to investors through certain brokerage firms, and as a result not actively traded, the Company has classified the fair value of this debt as Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

BIG HEART PET BRANDS AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 26~~January 25, ~~2014~~2015

(unaudited)

Note 7. Retirement Benefits

Periodic Retirement Benefit Cost

The Company sponsors a qualified defined benefit pension plan (“pension benefits” or “pension plan”) and several unfunded defined benefit postretirement plans (“other benefits” or “postretirement plans”) providing certain medical, dental and life insurance benefits to eligible retired, salaried, non-union hourly and union employees. See Note 11 of the 2014 Annual Report for additional information about these plans. The components of net periodic benefit cost for the pension benefits and other benefits for the periods indicated are as follows (in millions):

	~~Pension Benefits~~		Pension Benefits					~~Other Benefits~~					Other Benefits
	~~Three Months Ended~~		Three Months Ended
	October 26, 2014				October 27, 2013			October 26, 2014			October 27, 2013
			January 25,2015					January 26,2014					January 25,2015			January 26,2014
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost for benefits earned during the period	$	~~1.8~~		1.8	$	~~1.7~~	$	$	0.1.8		$	~~0.1~~		-	$		-
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		~~1.4~~		1.3		~~1.9~~			01.38			~~0.6~~		0.4			0.7
Expected return on plan assets		~~(2.2~~	)	(2.2)		~~(3.3~~	)		-(3.4)			-		-			-
Net loss amortization		-				-			(0.4	)		(0.3	)
Net (loss) gain amortization				-					-					(0.5)			(0.3)
Net periodic benefit cost	$	1.0			$	0.3		$	-		$	0.4
Net periodic benefit cost (credit)	$			0.9			$		0.2		$			(0.1)	$		0.4
			Pension Benefits										Other Benefits
			Nine Months Ended
			January 25,2015					January 26,2014					January 25,2015			January 26,2014
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost for benefits earned during the period	$			5.4			$		5.3		$			0.1	$		0.1
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation				4.1					5.5					1.1			2.0
Expected return on plan assets				(6.6)					(10.1)					-			-
Net (loss) gain amortization				-					-					(1.3)			0.9
Net periodic benefit cost (credit)	$			2.9			$		0.7		$			(0.1)	$		3.0

	Pension Benefits						Other Benefits
	Six Months Ended
	October 26, 2014			October 27, 2013			October 26, 2014			October 27, 2013
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost for benefits earned during the period	$	3.6		$	3.5		$	0.1		$	0.1
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		2.8			3.7			0.7			1.3
Expected return on plan assets		(4.4	)		(6.7	)		-			-
Net loss amortization		-			-			(0.8	)		(0.6	)
Net periodic benefit cost	$	2.0		$	0.5		$	-		$	0.8

Plan Amendment

Big Heart Pet maintains a retiree medical defined benefit plan. In December 2014, Big Heart Pet amended the plan, with respect to Medicare-eligible retirees, to convert from a premium based plan to a healthcare exchange effective January 1, 2015. The change resulted in a decrease to the projected benefit obligation and a corresponding gain of $18.9 million, which will be amortized over five years. As a result, the Company recognized a $0.3 million benefit to the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended January 25, 2015, with an approximate $1.0 million benefit expected to be recognized in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2015. The re-measurement of the plan obligations as of January 1, 2015 utilized a discount rate of 4.30%, as well as the

RP-2014 mortality table with collar adjustment and generational projection based on MP-2014 (issued October 2014).

Sale of the Consumer Products Business

Following the sale of the Consumer Products Business, the Company transferred a significant amount of the plan obligations and plan assets for the pension benefits and other benefits, as well as the related components of net periodic benefit costs, for the transferred employees and retirees of the Consumer Products Business to the Acquiror. The Company ~~expects~~completed ~~to complete~~ the transfer of plan assets for pension benefits ~~later~~ in ~~fiscal~~February 2015. Plan assets for the pension benefits were allocated to the Acquiror in accordance with the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 Section 4044. The final transfer ~~will~~amount bewas adjusted to reflect ~~actual~~ actual investment income or losses less pension payments made by the Company on the Acquirors’ behalf, from the sale date to the actual asset transfer ~~dates~~date, in accordance with the purchase agreement. The Company’s ~~current estimates of the~~ final transfer ~~amounts~~amount ~~were~~ was materially accurate to ~~those~~the ~~amounts~~ amount disclosed in Note 11 of the 2014 Annual Report ~~in Note 11~~.

BIG HEART PET BRANDS AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 26~~January 25, ~~2014~~2015

(unaudited)

Note 8. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ~~(Loss)~~

The following table summarizes the reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive income ~~(loss)~~ to the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the periods indicated (in millions):

Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income(Loss) Components	Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other ComprehensiveIncome (Loss)														Affected Line Item in theCondensed ConsolidatedStatements of Operations
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Components			Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income																Affected Line Item in theCondensed ConsolidatedStatements of Operations
	~~Three Months Ended~~		Three Months Ended					~~Six Months Ended~~					Nine Months Ended
	October 26, 2014				October 27, 2013			October 26, 2014			October 27, 2013
			January 25,2015					January 26,2014					January 25,2015				January 26,2014
Gains (losses) on cash flow hedges:
Commodity and other contracts	$	~~(2.7~~	)	(2.3)	$	~~2.2~~	$	$	(34.17	)	$	~~1.9~~		(5.4)	~~Cost of products sold~~	$		7.0	Cost of products sold
Foreign currency exchange contracts		-		0.4		-			~~(0.1~~-	)		-		0.3	~~Cost of products sold~~			-	Cost of products sold
Total reclassifications, before tax		~~(2.7~~	)	(1.9)		~~2.2~~			(34.27	)		~~1.9~~		(5.1)				7.0
Tax provision (benefit)		~~(1.0~~	)	(0.7)		~~0.8~~			(1.28	)		~~0.7~~		(2.0)	~~Provision for income taxes~~			2.7	Provision for income taxes
Total reclassifications, net of tax	$	~~(1.7~~	)	(1.2)	$	~~1.4~~	$	$	(2.09	)	$	~~1.2~~		(3.1)		$		4.3
Defined benefit plan items(1):
Amortization of prior service benefits	$	(0.4	)		$	0.3		$	(0.7	)	$	0.7
Amortization of prior service benefits (credits)	$			-			$		0.3		$			(0.7)		$		1.1
Amortization of actuarial gains (losses)		~~0.4~~		0.3		~~(0.3~~	)		(0.83)			~~(0.6~~	)	1.1				(1.0)
Total reclassifications, before tax		-		0.3		-			~~0.1~~-			~~0.1~~		0.4				0.1
Tax provision (benefit)		-				-			-			-			Provision for income taxes
Tax provision				0.1					-					0.2				-	Provision for income taxes
Total reclassifications, net of tax	$	-		0.2	$	-	$	$	~~0.1~~-		$	~~0.1~~		0.2		$		0.1

(1) These accumulated and other comprehensive income ~~(loss)~~ components are included in the computation of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs. See Note 7 for additional information.

Note 9. Legal Proceedings

Except as set forth below, there have been no material developments in the Company’s legal proceedings since the legal proceedings reported in the 2014 Annual Report.

On February 2, 2015, Plaintiff filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of Florida (Thomas v. Big Heart Pet Brands), alleging false and misleading advertising and misbranding under Florida’s consumer protection laws, negligence and breach of warranties. Specifically, the complaint alleges that Nature’s Recipe claims of “all natural” and “no artificial preservatives” on its packaging are inaccurate and misleading. Plaintiff seeks certification as a class action and damages in excess of $5.0 million. The Company denies these allegations and intends to vigorously defend itself. The Company cannot at this time reasonably estimate a range of exposure, if any, of the potential liability.

On October 31, 2014, the Ecuador National Court of Justice issued a final, non-appealable decision relating to the appeal by Empresa Pesquara Ecautorian S.A. Empesec (“Empesec”), an Ecuadorian corporation, of tax assessment claims made by the Ecuador Internal Revenue Service (“EIRS”) against Empesec for the 1999 tax year. Empesec is a former indirect subsidiary of H.J. Heinz Company (“Heinz”) involved in the North American tuna business (including the StarKist brand) that the Company acquired from Heinz in December 2002 and subsequently sold in October 2008. Empesec has been disputing the 1999 tax year assessment in court along with an assessment related to the 2000 tax year (an appeal relating to the 2000 assessment is currently pending). The Company did not have a business relationship with Empesec during 1999 or 2000. The assessment for the 1999 tax year is subject to enforcement against Empesec; however, Empesec believes that Heinz has an indemnification obligation. The Company understands that as of May 2013 the amount assessed for the 1999 tax year was approximately $4.5 million and the amount assessed for the 2000 tax year was approximately $5.2 million (including interest). The Company believes that Heinz retained the obligation to indemnify Empesec for these tax assessments. Recently, beginning in June 2013, Heinz has asserted that the Company was responsible for indemnifying Empesec for the assessments. The Company responded to Heinz that the language of the agreements relating to the 2002 acquisition of the North American tuna and other businesses from Heinz and its decade-long course of conduct made Heinz responsible for the indemnification obligation. Heinz and the Company have continued these discussions with no resolution. No litigation against the Company has been initiated or threatened by Heinz. The Company plans to continue to vigorously assert its position that Heinz bears full responsibility for the indemnification obligation. Since the Company believes that Heinz is responsible for the indemnification obligation, it does not believe that a loss is probable at this time. However, the Company cannot currently predict the ultimate outcome of this matter and therefore cannot at this time reasonably estimate a range of exposure, if any, of the potential liability.

BIG HEART PET BRANDS AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 26~~January 25, ~~2014~~2015

(unaudited)

~~Note~~On January 931, 2014, Plaintiff filed a complaint in the Superior Court of California, San Francisco County (Gamez v. ~~Legal~~Del ~~Proceedings~~Monte) alleging violations of various California wage and hour statutes. This lawsuit was transferred to Del Monte Foods, Inc. pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement. However, liabilities associated with Kingsburg, CA and Terminal Island, CA facilities were retained by the Company. On August 7, 2014, the Court approved to transfer this case to the Superior Court of California, Fresno County. On October 14, 2014, the Company was served with the Complaint. Del Monte Foods, Inc. is maintaining primary defense of the litigation, but any settlement made with the class will likely include the Company. The Company denies these allegations and intends to vigorously defend itself. The Company has accrued an estimated amount to resolve this matter that is not considered material.

~~Except~~On asApril 19, ~~set~~2013, ~~forth~~Plaintiff ~~below~~filed a complaint on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated employees in Superior Court of California, ~~there~~Alameda ~~have~~County ~~been~~(Montgomery nov. ~~material~~Del ~~developments~~Monte) alleging, inter alia, failure to provide meal and rest periods and pay wages properly in violation of various California wage and hour statutes. This lawsuit was transferred to Del Monte Foods, Inc. pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement. However, liabilities associated with Kingsburg, CA and Terminal Island, CA facilities were retained by the Company’s. Del ~~legal~~Monte ~~proceedings~~Foods, ~~since~~Inc. is maintaining primary defense of the ~~legal~~litigation, ~~proceedings~~but any settlement made with the class will likely include the Company. The Company denies these allegations and intends to vigorously defend ~~reported~~itself. inMediation was held on June 24, 2014. A settlement was preliminarily approved by the Court on December 4, 2014. ~~Annual~~The ~~Report~~hearing for final Court approval is set for May 18, 2015. The Company has accrued an estimated amount to resolve this matter that is not considered material, and the Company’s share of the settlement is expected to be covered by the amount accrued.

On ~~October~~ January 31, ~~2014~~2013, ~~the~~a ~~Ecuador~~putative ~~National~~class ~~Court~~action ofcomplaint ~~Justice~~was ~~issued~~filed aagainst ~~final,~~the ~~non-appealable~~Company ~~decision~~in ~~relating to~~ the ~~appeal~~Circuit byCourt ~~Empresa~~of ~~Pesquara~~Jackson ~~Ecautorian~~County, ~~S.A.~~Missouri, ~~Empesec~~ (~~“Empesec”),~~Miller anv. ~~Ecuadorian~~Del ~~corporation~~Monte, offormerly ~~tax~~known ~~assessment~~as ~~claims~~Harmon ~~made~~v. byDel ~~the~~Monte) ~~Ecuador~~alleging ~~Internal~~that ~~Revenue~~Milo’s Kitchen ~~Service~~chicken jerky treats (“~~EIRS~~Chicken Jerky Treats”) ~~against~~and ~~Empesec~~Milo’s ~~for~~Kitchen ~~the~~Chicken ~~1999~~Grillers ~~tax~~Recipe ~~year.~~home-style ~~Empesec~~dog istreats ~~a former~~contain ~~indirect~~“poisonous ~~subsidiary~~antibiotics ofand ~~H.J.~~other ~~Heinz~~potentially ~~Company~~lethal ~~(“Heinz~~substances.”) ~~involved~~Plaintiff inseeks certification ~~the~~as ~~North~~a ~~American~~class ~~tuna~~action, ~~business~~as ~~(including~~well ~~the~~as ~~StarKist~~restitution ~~brand)~~and ~~that~~damages ~~the~~not ~~Company~~to ~~acquired~~exceed ~~from~~$75,000 ~~Heinz~~per inclass ~~December~~member ~~2002~~ and ~~subsequently~~the ~~sold~~aggregated inclaim ~~October~~for ~~2008. Empesec~~damages ~~has~~of ~~been disputing~~ the ~~1999~~class ~~tax~~not ~~year~~to ~~assessment~~exceed in$5.0 ~~court~~million ~~along~~under ~~with~~the anMissouri ~~assessment~~Merchandising ~~related~~Practices toAct. ~~the~~The ~~2000~~complaint also ~~tax~~alleges ~~year~~the ~~(an~~Company ~~appeal~~continued ~~relating~~ to ~~the~~sell ~~2000~~its ~~assessment~~Chicken isJerky ~~currently~~Treats ~~pending). The~~in ~~Company~~Jackson ~~did~~County, ~~not~~Missouri ~~have~~after ait ~~business~~announced ~~relationship~~its ~~with Empesec~~recall ~~during~~of ~~1999~~the orproduct ~~2000.~~on January 9, 2013. The ~~assessment~~Company ~~for~~successfully ~~the~~removed ~~1999~~this ~~tax~~case ~~year~~to isfederal ~~subject~~court toon ~~enforcement~~March 12, 2013. ~~against~~On ~~Empesec;~~April 9, ~~however~~2013, ~~Empesec~~Plaintiff ~~believes~~filed ~~that~~a ~~Heinz~~Second ~~has~~Amended anClass ~~indemnification~~Action ~~obligation~~Petition against the Company. The Company ~~understands~~filed ~~that~~its asMotion ofto ~~May~~Transfer ~~2013~~to the ~~amount~~Western ~~assessed for~~District ~~the~~of ~~1999~~Pennsylvania ~~tax~~on ~~year~~April 19, ~~was~~2013 ~~approximately $4.5 million~~ and ~~the~~its ~~amount~~Motion ~~assessed~~to ~~for~~Stay Pending the Motion ~~2000~~to ~~tax~~Transfer ~~year~~on ~~was~~April 25, ~~approximately $5~~2013.2 ~~million (including interest).~~ The ~~Company~~Motion ~~believes~~to ~~that~~Stay ~~Heinz~~was ~~retained~~granted the ~~obligation~~same today ~~indemnify~~it ~~Empesec~~was ~~for~~filed. ~~these~~On ~~tax assessments.~~May ~~Recently~~6, ~~beginning in June~~ 2013, ~~Heinz~~Plaintiff ~~has~~filed ~~asserted~~an ~~that~~Opposition ~~the~~to ~~Company~~Defendant’s ~~was~~Motion ~~responsible~~to ~~for indemnifying Empesec for the assessments~~Transfer. The Company ~~responded~~filed toits ~~Heinz~~Reply ~~that~~in ~~the~~Support ~~language~~ of ~~the~~its ~~agreements~~Motion ~~relating~~ to Transfer ~~the~~on ~~2002 acquisition~~May 23, of2013. ~~the~~The ~~North~~Court ~~American~~denied ~~tuna~~the ~~and~~Company’s ~~other~~Motion ~~businesses~~to ~~from~~Transfer ~~Heinz~~on ~~and~~July 22, ~~its~~2013. ~~decade-long~~The ~~course~~Company offiled ~~conduct~~its ~~made~~Answer ~~Heinz~~on ~~responsible~~August 13, ~~for~~2013 ~~the~~and ~~indemnification~~discovery ~~obligation~~has commenced. On February ~~Heinz~~3, ~~and~~2014, ~~the~~Plaintiff ~~Company~~filed ~~have~~a ~~continued~~Third ~~these~~Amended Complaint ~~discussions~~and ~~with~~filed ~~no resolution. No~~a ~~litigation~~Fourth ~~against~~Amended ~~the~~Complaint ~~Company~~to ~~has~~include ~~been~~an ~~initiated~~additional ornamed ~~threatened~~plaintiff byon ~~Heinz~~April 22, 2014. The ~~Company~~Plaintiffs ~~plans~~filed toa ~~continue~~Fifth toAmended ~~vigorously~~Complaint ~~assert~~on ~~its~~July 14, ~~position~~2014 ~~that~~to ~~Heinz~~include ~~bears~~an ~~full~~additional ~~responsibility~~Plaintiff ~~for~~and ~~the~~remove ~~indemnification~~Harmon ~~obligation.~~as ~~Since the Company~~a ~~believes~~named ~~that~~Plaintiff. ~~Heinz~~The isOpposition ~~responsible~~to ~~for~~ the ~~indemnification~~Plaintiffs’ ~~obligation,~~Motion itfor ~~does~~Class ~~not~~Certification ~~believe~~was ~~that~~filed aon ~~loss~~January 20, ~~is probable at this time~~2015. ~~However,~~The ~~the~~ Company ~~cannot~~denies ~~currently~~these ~~predict~~allegations ~~the~~and ~~ultimate~~intends ~~outcome~~to ofvigorously ~~this~~defend ~~matter~~itself. ~~and~~The ~~therefore~~Company cannot at this time ~~reasonably~~ reasonably estimate a range of exposure, if any, of the potential liability.

On ~~January~~September 316, ~~2014~~2012, October 12, ~~Plaintiff~~2012 and October 16, 2012, three separate putative class action complaints were filed aagainst ~~complaint~~the Company in ~~the~~U.S. ~~Superior~~District Court for the Northern District of California (Langone v. Del Monte, ~~San~~Ruff ~~Francisco~~v. ~~County~~Del ~~(Gamez~~Monte, and Funke v. Del Monte, respectively) alleging product ~~violations~~liability ofclaims ~~various~~relating ~~California~~to ~~wage~~Chicken ~~and~~Jerky ~~hour statutes~~Treats. ~~This~~Specifically, ~~lawsuit~~the ~~was~~complaints ~~transferred~~allege tothat ~~Del~~Plaintiffs’ ~~Monte~~dogs ~~Foods,~~became ~~Inc~~ill as a result of consumption of Chicken Jerky Treats. ~~pursuant~~The tocomplaints also allege that the ~~terms~~Company breached its warranties and California’s consumer protection laws. Each of the ~~purchase~~complaints ~~agreement~~seeks certification as a class action and damages in excess of $5.0 million. The Company denies these allegations and intends to vigorously defend itself. On December ~~However~~18, ~~liabilities~~ ~~associated~~2012, ~~with~~Plaintiffs ~~Kingsburg,~~filed CAa motion to relate and ~~Terminal~~consolidate ~~Island~~the Langone, CARuff ~~facilities~~and ~~were~~Funke ~~retained~~matters. byThe Company agreed that the ~~Company~~cases are related but argued in its response that they should not be consolidated. On ~~August~~The Court ordered the cases are related in an Order on January 724, ~~2014~~2013. In the Langone case, the ~~Court~~Company ~~approved~~filed a Motion to ~~transfer~~Transfer/Dismiss ~~this~~on ~~case~~February 1, to2013. Plaintiff in the ~~Superior~~Langone ~~Court~~matter ofvoluntarily ~~California,~~dismissed ~~Fresno~~his ~~County.~~Complaint without ~~Del~~prejudice ~~Monte~~on ~~Foods~~February 21, ~~Inc~~ 2013 and re-filed in the U.S. isDistrict ~~maintaining~~Court ~~primary~~for ~~defense~~the Western District of ~~the~~Pennsylvania ~~litigation~~on May 21, ~~but~~2013. ~~any~~The ~~settlement~~Company ~~made~~filed ~~with~~its Motion to Dismiss in the ~~class~~Langone ~~will~~case ~~likely~~with ~~include~~the U.S. District Court for the ~~Company~~Western District of Pennsylvania on August 2, 2013. The ~~Company~~individual ~~denies~~claims ~~these~~in ~~allegations~~the Langone case were settled for a de minimus amount, and ~~intends~~a stipulation to ~~vigorously~~dismiss ~~defend~~with ~~itself.~~prejudice ~~The~~was ~~Company~~filed ~~has~~on ~~accrued~~November 25, an2013. ~~estimated~~On ~~amount~~April 9, to2013, ~~resolve~~the ~~this~~Court ~~matter~~transferred ~~that~~Ruff isand ~~not~~Funke ~~considered~~to ~~material~~the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania but denied without prejudice Defendant’s motions to

On April 19, 2013, Plaintiff filed a complaint on behalf of himself and all other similarly situated employees in Superior Court of California, Alameda County (Montgomery v. Del Monte) alleging, inter alia, failure to provide meal and rest periods and pay wages properly in violation of various California wage and hour statutes. This lawsuit was transferred to Del Monte Foods, Inc. pursuant to the terms of the purchase agreement. However, liabilities associated with Kingsburg, CA and Terminal Island, CA facilities were retained by the Company. Del Monte Foods, Inc. is maintaining primary defense of the litigation, but any settlement made with the class will likely include the Company. The Company denies these allegations and intends to vigorously defend itself. Mediation was held on June 24, 2014. A settlement was preliminarily approved by the Court on December 4, 2014. The Company has accrued an estimated amount to resolve this matter that is not considered material, and the Company’s share of the settlement is expected to be covered by the amount accrued.

On January 31, 2013, a putative class action complaint was filed against the Company in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, (Miller v. Del Monte, formerly known as Harmon v. Del Monte) alleging that Milo’s Kitchen chicken jerky treats (“Chicken Jerky Treats”) and Milo’s Kitchen Chicken Grillers Recipe home-style dog treats contain “poisonous antibiotics and other potentially lethal substances.” Plaintiff seeks certification as a class action, as well as restitution and damages not to exceed $75,000 per class member and the aggregated claim for damages of the class not to exceed $5.0 million under the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act. The complaint also alleges the Company continued to sell its Chicken Jerky Treats in Jackson County, Missouri after it announced its recall of the product on January 9, 2013. The Company successfully removed this case to federal court on March 12, 2013. On April 9, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Class Action Petition against the Company. The Company filed its Motion to Transfer to the Western District of Pennsylvania on April 19, 2013 and its Motion to Stay Pending the Motion to Transfer on April 25, 2013.

BIG HEART PET BRANDS AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 26~~January 25, ~~2014~~2015

(unaudited)

~~The~~consolidate ~~Motion~~and todismiss. ~~Stay~~On ~~was~~April 23, ~~granted~~2013, the ~~same~~Company ~~day~~filed itits ~~was~~Motion ~~filed.~~to OnDismiss ~~May 6,~~in ~~2013,~~Ruff ~~Plaintiff~~and ~~filed~~Funke anwith ~~Opposition~~the toU.S. ~~Defendant’s~~District ~~Motion~~Court tofor ~~Transfer.~~the ~~The~~Western ~~Company~~District ~~filed~~of Pennsylvania and its Reply in Support of its Motion to ~~Transfer~~Dismiss in both cases on ~~May~~June 233, 2013. ~~The~~On ~~Court~~February 11, ~~denied~~2014, the ~~Company’s~~Magistrate ~~Motion~~Judge toissued ~~Transfer~~a onReport ~~July 22,~~and ~~2013.~~Recommendation ~~The~~that ~~Company~~the ~~filed~~Motion ~~its~~to ~~Answer~~Dismiss onbe ~~August 13,~~granted ~~2013~~as ~~and~~to ~~discovery~~Plaintiffs’ ~~has~~claim ~~commenced.~~for Onunjust enrichment ~~February 3,~~and ~~2014,~~denied ~~Plaintiff~~in ~~filed~~all ~~a Third~~other ~~Amended~~respects. ~~Complaint~~The ~~and~~Company filed aits ~~Fourth~~objections ~~Amended Complaint~~ to ~~include~~the anReport ~~additional~~and ~~named~~Recommendations ~~plaintiff~~ on ~~April~~March 225, 2014. The ~~Plaintiffs~~District ~~filed~~Judge aadopted ~~Fifth~~the ~~Amended~~Magistrate ~~Complaint~~Judge’s onReport ~~July 14, 2014 to include an additional Plaintiff~~ and ~~remove Harmon~~Recommendation ason aMarch 25, ~~named Plaintiff~~2014. The Company ~~denies~~filed ~~these~~its ~~allegations~~Answer ~~and~~on ~~intends~~April 8, ~~to vigorously defend itself~~2014. The Company cannot at this time reasonably estimate a range of exposure, if any, of the potential liability.

On September 6, 2012, October 12, 2012 and October 16, 2012, three separate putative class action complaints were filed against the Company in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California (Langone v. Del Monte, Ruff v. Del Monte, and Funke v. Del Monte, respectively) alleging product liability claims relating to Chicken Jerky Treats. Specifically, the complaints allege that Plaintiffs’ dogs became ill as a result of consumption of Chicken Jerky Treats. The complaints also allege that the Company breached its warranties and California’s consumer protection laws. Each of the complaints seeks certification as a class action and damages in excess of $5.0 million. The Company denies these allegations and intends to vigorously defend itself. On December 18, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a motion to relate and consolidate the Langone, Ruff and Funke matters. The Company agreed that the cases are related but argued in its response that they should not be consolidated. The Court ordered the cases are related in an Order on January 24, 2013. In the Langone case, the Company filed a Motion to Transfer/Dismiss on February 1, 2013. Plaintiff in the Langone matter voluntarily dismissed his Complaint without prejudice on February 21, 2013 and re-filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on May 21, 2013. The Company filed its Motion to Dismiss in the Langone case with the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania on August 2, 2013. The individual claims in the Langone case were settled for a de minimus amount, and a stipulation to dismiss with prejudice was filed on November 25, 2013. On April 9, 2013, the Court transferred Ruff and Funke to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania but denied without prejudice Defendant’s motions to consolidate and dismiss. On April 23, 2013, the Company filed its Motion to Dismiss in Ruff and Funke with the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania and its Reply in Support of its Motion to Dismiss in both cases on June 3, 2013. On February 11, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation that the Motion to Dismiss be granted as to Plaintiffs’ claim for unjust enrichment and denied in all other respects. The Company filed its objections to the Report and Recommendations on March 5, 2014. The District Judge adopted the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation on March 25, 2014. The Company filed its Answer on April 8, 2014. The Company cannot at this time reasonably estimate a range of exposure, if any, of the potential liability.

On July 19, 2012, a putative class action complaint was filed against the Company in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania (Mazur v. Del Monte) alleging product liability claims relating to Chicken Jerky Treats. Specifically, the complaint alleges that Plaintiff’s dog became ill and had to be euthanized as a result of consumption of Chicken Jerky Treats. The complaint also alleges that the Company breached its warranties and Pennsylvania’s consumer protection laws. The complaint seeks certification as a class action and damages in excess of $5.0 million. The Company denies these allegations and intends to vigorously defend itself. On August 3, 2012, Plaintiff’s counsel filed a Motion to Consolidate the previously filed two similar class actions against Nestle Purina Petcare Company, owner of the Waggin’ Train brand of chicken jerky treats, in U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois under the federal rules for multi-district litigation (“MDL”). Plaintiff’s Motion also sought to include the case against the Company in the proposed MDL consolidation as a “related case.” On September 28, 2012, the Court denied the MDL Motion. The case will now proceed in the jurisdiction in which it was originally filed. Plaintiff filed a Motion for Leave to Commence Limited Discovery on the subject of the voluntary recall of Chicken Jerky Treats on January 25, 2013. The Company filed its response opposing the Motion on February 8, 2013. The Court denied Plaintiff’s Motion on March 12, 2013; thus, discovery is stayed until the Court rules on the Company’s Motion to Dismiss, which was filed on September 24, 2012. On May 24, 2013, the Judge in the matter issued a Report and Recommendation stating that the Motion to Dismiss be granted as to Plaintiff’s claim for unjust enrichment and denied in all other respects. The Company filed its Objections to the Report and Recommendation on June 7, 2013. The Court issued an Order adopting the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation on June 25, 2013. The Court denied the Company’s Motion for Reconsideration on July 8, 2013. The Company filed its Answer on August 2, 2013. The Company cannot at this time reasonably estimate a range of exposure, if any, of the potential liability.

On August 16, 2013, the Langone, Ruff, Funke and Mazur cases were consolidated.

On June 22, 2012, a putative class action complaint was filed against the Company in Los Angeles Superior Court (Webster v. Del Monte) alleging false advertising under California’s consumer protection laws, negligence, breach of warranty and strict liability. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the Company engaged in false advertising by representing that the Chicken Jerky Treats are healthy, wholesome, and safe for consumption by dogs, and alleges that Plaintiff’s pet became ill after consuming Chicken Jerky Treats. The allegations apply to all other putative class members similarly situated. The complaint seeks certification as a class action and unspecified damages, disgorgement of profits, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and injunctive relief. The Company denies these allegations and intends to vigorously defend itself. On September 6, 2012, the Company filed a Notice of Removal to remove the case to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Plaintiff subsequently filed a motion to amend its complaint to remove the federal class action claims and remand the case back to Los Angeles County Superior Court. The Company subsequently stipulated to Plaintiff’s motion, and the case has been remanded to Los Angeles County Superior Court. The Company filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on July 3, 2013. The Plaintiff filed an Opposition on August 21, 2013. The Company filed its Reply on August 27, 2013. The Court denied the Company’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on February 20, 2014. The Company cannot at this time reasonably estimate a range of exposure, if any, of the potential liability.

Note 10. Related Party Transactions

See Note 17 of the 2014 Annual Report for a description of the Company’s related party transactions. As of January 25, 2015, there was a payable of $1.6 million due to the managers related to the monitoring agreement, which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of April 27, 2014, there was a payable of $1.6 million due to the managers related to the monitoring agreement. For the three and nine months ended January 25, 2015 and January 26, 2014 the Company paid $0.7 million and $2.1 million, respectively, to a KKR affiliate for rent related to a leased administrative space in Pittsburgh, PA. During the nine months ended January 26, 2014 the Company paid $3.5 million to a Vestar advisor for a finder’s fee related to the Natural Balance acquisition.

BIG HEART PET BRANDS AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

For the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October 26~~January 25, ~~2014~~2015

(unaudited)

On August 16, 2013, the Langone, Ruff, Funke and Mazur cases were consolidated.

On June 22, 2012, a putative class action complaint was filed against the Company in Los Angeles Superior Court (Webster v. Del Monte) alleging false advertising under California’s consumer protection laws, negligence, breach of warranty and strict liability. Specifically, the complaint alleges that the Company engaged in false advertising by representing that the Chicken Jerky Treats are healthy, wholesome, and safe for consumption by dogs, and alleges that Plaintiff’s pet became ill after consuming Chicken Jerky Treats. The allegations apply to all other putative class members similarly situated. The complaint seeks certification as a class action and unspecified damages, disgorgement of profits, punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and injunctive relief. The Company denies these allegations and intends to vigorously defend itself. On September 6, 2012, the Company filed a Notice of Removal to remove the case to the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California. Plaintiff subsequently filed a motion to amend its complaint to remove the federal class action claims and remand the case back to Los Angeles County Superior Court. The Company subsequently stipulated to Plaintiff’s motion, and the case has been remanded to Los Angeles County Superior Court. The Company filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on July 3, 2013. The Plaintiff filed an Opposition on August 21, 2013. The Company filed its Reply on August 27, 2013. The Court denied the Company’s Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings on February 20, 2014. The Company cannot at this time reasonably estimate a range of exposure, if any, of the potential liability.

Note 10. Related Party Transactions

See Note 17 of the 2014 Annual Report for a description of the Company’s related party transactions. As of October 26, 2014, there was a payable of $1.6 million due to the managers related to the monitoring agreement, which is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. As of April 27, 2014, there was a payable of $1.6 million due to the managers related to the monitoring agreement. For the three and six months ended October 26, 2014 and October 27, 2013, the Company paid $0.7 million and $1.4 million, respectively, to a KKR affiliate for rent related to a leased administrative space in Pittsburgh, PA. During the six months ended October 27, 2013, the Company paid $3.5 million to a Vestar advisor for a finder’s fee related to the Natural Balance acquisition.

Note 11. Subsequent Events

~~The~~On ~~Company~~February 3, ~~maintains~~2015, athe ~~retiree~~Parent ~~medical~~entered ~~defined~~into ~~benefit~~an ~~plan.~~Agreement Inand ~~December~~Plan ~~2014,~~of Merger (the ~~Company~~“Merger ~~amended~~Agreement”) ~~the~~with ~~plan,~~The ~~with~~J. ~~respect~~M. toSmucker ~~Medicare-eligible~~Company ~~retirees~~(“Smucker”), toand ~~convert~~certain ~~from~~subsidiaries aof ~~premium~~Smucker, ~~based~~pursuant ~~plan~~ to awhich ~~healthcare~~Smucker ~~exchange~~will ~~effective~~acquire ~~January~~the 1,Parent ~~2015.~~(the ~~The~~“Smucker ~~change~~Merger”), ~~will~~on ~~result~~the interms aand ~~decrease~~subject to the ~~projected~~conditions ~~benefit~~set ~~obligation~~forth ofin ~~approximately~~the ~~$15~~Merger ~~million~~Agreement. toThe ~~$19~~aggregate purchase ~~million~~price ~~and~~paid ~~a corresponding~~by ~~gain~~Smucker ~~which~~ will beconsist ~~amortized~~of ~~over~~approximately ~~five~~17.9 million ~~years~~shares of Smucker common stock and approximately $1.3 Asbillion ain ~~result~~cash, ~~the~~subject ~~Company~~to ~~expects~~ a ~~benefit~~post-closing toworking ~~the~~capital ~~statement~~adjustment, ofand ~~operations~~adjustment for ~~fiscal~~cash, ~~2015~~transaction ofexpenses and certain other amounts. Smucker will also refinance approximately $1.2.6 ~~million~~billion of the Company’s outstanding debt.

Under the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan for Key Employees of Blue Acquisition Group, Inc., the Smucker Merger constitutes a change in control transaction. As of the Smucker Merger closing date, any outstanding unvested portion of restricted common stock, service-based stock options, EBITDA Performance Options and, except for one officer, Exit Return Options become vested and all vested restricted common stock and stock options will be converted into Smucker common stock and cash pursuant to the terms of the Merger Agreement. The Company is currently evaluating and will recognize stock compensation expense related to the accelerated vesting of restricted common stock and stock options in the consolidated statement of operations upon the closing of the Smucker Merger.

On February 13, 2015, the Company issued a notice pursuant to the indenture governing its $900.0 million outstanding 7.625% Senior Notes due 2019, that it intends to redeem the full aggregate principal amount outstanding of the Senior Notes as early as March 16, 2015. The Senior Notes will be redeemed at a redemption price equal to 101.906% of their aggregate principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. The Company is obligated to pay the redemption price on the redemption date subject to the occurrence of the Effective Time (as defined in the Merger Agreement) among the Parent and Smucker, the receipt by Smucker of net cash proceeds from third-party debt financing sources for the purpose of enabling Smucker to fulfill its obligations under the Merger Agreement, and receipt by the Company of immediately available funds for the purpose of enabling the Company to redeem the Senior Notes in full and pay certain fees and expenses in connection therewith.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

This discussion is intended to further the reader’s understanding of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of our Company. It should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended April 27, 2014 (the “2014 Annual Report”). These historical financial statements may not be indicative of our future performance. This Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains a number of forward-looking statements, all of which are based on our current expectations and could be affected by the uncertainties and risks described in “Part I, Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our 2014 Annual Report and in “Part II, Item 1A. Risk Factors” of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Corporate Overview

Our Business

Big Heart Pet Brands and its consolidated subsidiaries (“Big Heart Pet” or the “Company”) is the largest U.S. standalone producer, distributor and marketer of premium quality, branded pet food and pet snacks generating approximately $2.2 billion in net sales from continuing operations in fiscal 2014. Our portfolio of brands, with a foundation in dog and cat food and treats, strives to cater to every pet life stage and every family’s budget through the availability and accessibility of our products. Our pet food and pet snack brands include well known household brands such as Meow Mix, Milk-Bone, Kibbles ‘n Bits, 9Lives, Natural Balance, Pup-Peroni, Gravy Train, Nature’s Recipe, Canine Carry Outs, Milo’s Kitchen and other brand names. Our products are sold nationwide, in all channels serving retail markets, as well as certain export markets.

The results of the Consumer Products Business (see Note 1 of our consolidated financial statements in the 2014 Annual Report) have been reported as discontinued operations for all periods presented. Expenses allocated to discontinued operations are limited to selling, administrative and distribution expenses that were directly attributable to the Consumer Products Business, in accordance with the terms of the purchase agreement. Consequently, certain expenses that have historically been allocated to the Consumer Products segment are not included in discontinued operations. We have combined cash flows from discontinued operations with cash flows from continuing operations within the operating, investing and financing categories in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in the accompanying financial statements for all periods presented. Cash flows are not comparable year over year due to the sale of the Consumer Products Business.

The discussion below in “Executive Overview” and “Results of Operations” refers to continuing operations only, unless otherwise stated.

Key Performance Indicators

The following tables set forth some of our key performance indicators that we utilize to assess results of operations (dollars in millions):

	Three Months Ended
	October 26, 2014			October 27, 2013			Change			% Change			Volume (a)			Rate (b)
	January 25,2015			January 26,2014			Change			% Change			Volume (a)			Rate (b)
Net sales	$	~~565~~$ 589.59		$	~~552~~$ 575.07		$	13$ 14.52			2.45%	%		05.84%	%		1(2.69%)	%
Cost of products sold		~~372~~374.34			~~355~~368.75			165.69			41.76%	%		04.86%	%		(3.90%)	%
Gross profit		~~193~~215.25			~~196~~207.32			(38.13	)		(14.60%	%)
Selling, general and administrative expense (“SG&A”)		~~124~~111.60			124.58			0(13.18)			0(11.1%)	%
Operating income	$	68$ 104.65		$	71$ 82.84		$	(3$ 22.21	)		(426.58%	%)
Gross margin		3436.25%	%		3536.60%	%
SG&A as a % of net sales		2218.18%	%		2221.67%	%
Operating income margin		1217.27%	%		1314.03%	%

	Six Months Ended
			Nine Months Ended
	October 26, 2014				October 27, 2013			Change			% Change				Volume (a)				Rate (b)
			January 25,2015					January 26,2014					Change				% Change				Volume (a)		Rate (b)
Net sales	$	~~1,095.2~~		1,685.1	$	~~1,033.0~~	$	$	621,608.27		$	~~6.0~~	%	76.4		~~7.0~~	%	4.7%		~~(1.0~~	%)	6.4%		(1.7%)
Cost of products sold		~~714.3~~		1,088.7		~~657.8~~			561,026.53			~~8.6~~	%	62.4		~~7.8~~	%	6.1%		~~0.8~~	%	6.7%		(0.6%)
Gross profit		~~380.9~~		596.4		~~375.2~~			5582.74			~~1.5~~	%	14.0				2.4%
Selling, general and administrative expense (“SG&A”)		~~256.6~~		367.6		~~237.2~~			19362.40			~~8.2~~	%	5.6				1.5%
Operating income	$	~~124.3~~		228.8	$	~~138.0~~	$	$	~~(13~~220.74	)	$	~~(9.9~~	%)	8.4				3.8%
Gross margin		~~34.8~~	%	35.4%		~~36.3~~	%		36.2%
SG&A as a % of net sales		~~23.4~~	%	21.8%		~~23.0~~	%		22.5%
Operating income margin		~~11.3~~	%	13.6%		~~13.4~~	%		13.7%

^(a)	This column represents the change, as compared to the prior year period, due to volume. Volume represents the change resulting from the number of units sold, exclusive of any change in price. Volume changes in the above table include elasticity, the volume decline associated with price increases.

^(b)	This column represents the change, as compared to the prior year period, attributable to per unit changes in net sales or cost of products sold, as well as mix. Mix represents the change attributable to shifts in volume across products or channels.

~~Three Months Ended~~

Three Months Ended

~~Six Months Ended~~

Nine Months Ended

~~Trailing TwelveMonths EndedOctober 26,2014~~

Trailing TwelveMonths EndedJanuary 25,2015

October 26, 2014

October 27, 2013

October 26, 2014

October 27, 2013

January 25,2015

January 26,2014

January 25,2015

January 26,2014

Adjusted EBITDA (as specified in our debt agreements (c))

~~101.8~~

133.4

~~105.8~~

~~166~~131.3

~~222.0~~

299.7

~~394.1~~

353.3

396.2

Ratio of net debt to Adjusted EBITDA (d)

~~n/a~~

n/a

~~n/a~~

n/a

~~n/a~~

n/a

~~6.5~~

n/a

6.2 x

^(c)	Refer to “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures—Adjusted EBITDA” below.

^(d)	Net debt is calculated as total debt at the end of the period (including both short-term borrowings and long-term debt and excluding debt discount) less cash and cash equivalents.

Executive Overview

In the ~~second~~third quarter of fiscal 2015, we had net sales of $~~565~~589.5 9 million, operating income of $68104.65 million and income from continuing operations of $1733.74 million, compared to net sales of $~~552~~575.07 million, operating income of $7182.84 million and income from continuing operations of $615.26 million in the ~~second~~third quarter of fiscal 2014. Adjusted EBITDA was $~~101~~133.84 million for the three months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 and $~~105~~131.83 million for the three months ended ~~October~~January 2726, ~~2013~~2014. Refer to “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures—Adjusted EBITDA” below.

Net sales increased by 2.45% for the quarter. This increase was driven by the continued success of new products, partially offset by ~~trade spending investments to improve our market position in~~ a ~~deflationary~~challenging promotional environment, ~~driven~~primarily byrelated ~~lower~~to ~~commodity~~some ~~costs, in certain~~ of our ~~key mainstream~~ food brands. We strive to compete on brand building and innovation, not price.

Operating income for the quarter ~~decreased~~increased 426.58% as compared to the year-ago quarter. The increase was due to the benefit from the net sales increase, driven by new products, ~~was offset by trade spending mentioned above~~ coupled with ~~higher~~lower ~~operating~~SG&A and ~~marketing~~operating expenses.

Adjusted EBITDA ~~decreased~~increased 31.86% to $~~101~~133.84 million. Adjusted EBITDA was impacted by drivers similar to those of operating income described above; partially offset by the unfavorable impact from cash hedge positions, largely due to the current decline in energy prices. The cash impact of all hedging activities, as well as other adjustments as referenced in “Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures” below, are reflected in Adjusted EBITDA.

On February 3, 2015, we announced that our parent company, Blue Acquisition Group, Inc. (“Parent”) entered into an agreement to be acquired by The J. M. Smucker Company (“Smucker”), in a stock and cash transaction valued at approximately $5.8 billion. See “Note 11. Subsequent Events” to our condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for more information regarding this transaction.

Results of Operations

The following discussion provides a summary of operating results for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015, compared to the results for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2726, ~~2013~~2014:

Net sales

Net sales for the three months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 were $~~565~~589.59 million, an increase of $1314.5 2 million, or 2.45%, compared to $~~552~~575.0 7 million for the three months ended ~~October~~January 2726, ~~2013~~2014. The increase in net sales reflects the continued success of new products. Growth from new products was led by Milk-Bone Brushing Chews, ~~Kibbles n’ Bits American Grill,~~ the relaunch of ~~the~~ Milo’s Kitchen ~~brand~~, ~~and~~ Meow Mix Tender Centers with Vitality Bursts, and Kibbles n’ Bits American Grill. Partially offsetting the increase were ~~trade~~volume ~~spending~~declines ~~investments~~in toexisting ~~improve~~products ~~our~~reflecting ~~market position in~~ a ~~deflationary~~challenging promotional environment, ~~driven~~ byprimarily ~~lower~~related ~~commodity~~to ~~costs,~~some ~~in certain~~ of our ~~key mainstream~~ food brands ~~coupled with decreased volume in some lower margin products~~.

Net sales for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 were $1,~~095~~685.21 million, an increase of $6276.2 4 million, or 64.07%, compared to $1,~~033~~608.07 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2726, ~~2013~~2014. The increase reflects growth from successful new products across the portfolio and higher volume from the ~~prior year~~ acquisition of Natural Balance Pet Foods, Inc. (“Natural Balance”). The year-to-date results include Natural Balance for the full nine month period compared to prior year results which ~~only~~ included ~~the~~ ~~impact~~Natural Balance from the acquisition date of July 15, 2013. Partially offsetting the increase were ~~investments in~~ trade spending investments to support new products ~~and~~as towell as improve our market position in certain of our mainstream food brands.

Cost of products sold

Cost of products sold for the three months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 was $~~372~~374.3 4 million, an increase of $165.69 million, or 41.76%, compared to $~~355~~368.7 5 million for the three months ended ~~October~~January 2726, ~~2013~~2014. This increase was primarily due to higher volumes ~~and higher operating expenses~~, ~~driven~~partially offset by ~~the~~lower ~~timing of prior year productivity savings~~costs. Cost of products sold for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 was $~~714~~1,088.3 7 million, an increase of $5662.5 4 million, or 8.6.1%, compared to $~~657~~1,026.83 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2726, ~~2013~~2014. This increase was primarily due to higher volumes, ~~primarily~~ driven by the ~~prior~~full ~~year~~period ~~acquisition~~results of Natural Balance, asvolume ~~well~~compared asto ~~the timing of prior year productivity savings. We~~partial ~~are~~results ~~expecting lower input costs~~ in the ~~second~~prior ~~half of fiscal 2015 as compared to the second half of fiscal 2014~~period.

We ~~are~~currently ~~now~~utilize ~~utilizing~~ and expect to continue to utilize hedge accounting treatment for certain of our hedging transactions which began to impact cost of products sold in the second quarter of fiscal 2014. The impact of economic hedge transactions is reflected in other (income) expense, net. See “Other (income) expense, net” below.

Gross margin

Our gross margin percentage for the three months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 ~~decreased~~increased 10.4 5 points to 3436.25% compared to 3536.60% for the three months ended ~~October~~ January 2726, ~~2013~~2014. The ~~decrease~~increase was primarily driven by ~~increased~~lower ~~trade~~costs ~~spending~~ and ~~increased~~favorable ~~costs~~product mix, totaling aan ~~decrease~~increase of 20.89 margin points, partially offset by a 10.4 margin point ~~increase~~decrease due to ~~product~~increased ~~mix~~trade spending.

Our gross margin percentage for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~ January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 decreased 10.5 8 points to 3435.84% compared to 36.32% for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~ January 2726, ~~2013~~2014. The decrease was primarily driven by increased trade spending ~~and increased costs~~, totaling a decrease of 21.34 margin points, partially offset by a 0.8 6 margin point increase due to product mix.

Selling, general and administrative expense

SG&A expense for the three months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 was $~~124~~111.6 0 million, ana ~~increase~~decrease of $013.1 8 million, or 011.1%, compared to $124.5 8 million for the three months ended ~~October~~January 2726, ~~2013~~2014. This ~~increase~~decrease was primarily driven by ~~higher~~ lower marketing expenses due to ~~support~~timing ~~new~~and ~~products as well as brand building, largely offset by~~ lower general and administrative expenses due to the prior year impact of discontinued operations and merger and divestiture expenses ~~in the prior year period~~.

SG&A expense for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 was $~~256~~367.6 million, an increase of $195.46 million, or 81.25%, compared to $~~237~~362.2 0 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2726, ~~2013~~2014. This increase was primarily driven by higher marketing expenses due to timing to support new products as well as brand building, partially offset by lower general and administrative expenses due to the prior year impact of discontinued operations and merger and divestiture expenses ~~in the prior year period~~. Further, SG&A expense includes Natural Balance for the full ~~six~~nine month period as compared to prior year which included Natural Balance from the acquisition date. ~~We made significant up-front marketing investments in the first half of this fiscal year and as a result we expect marketing expenses to be more heavily weighted towards the first half of fiscal 2015.~~

Operating income

Operating income decreased by $3.2 million, or 4.5%, to $68.6 million for the three months ended October 26, 2014 from $71.8 million for the three months ended October 27, 2013. Operating income decreased by $13.7 million, or 9.9%, to $124.3 million for the six months ended October 26, 2014 from $138.0 million for the six months ended October 27, 2013. For both periods, the benefit from the net sales increases discussed above were more than offset by significant marketing and trade spending investments discussed above, as well as higher operating expenses.

Operating income

Operating income increased by $22.1 million, or 26.8%, to $104.5 million for the three months ended January 25, 2015 from $82.4 million for the three months ended January 26, 2014. The increase was primarily driven by the benefit from net sales discussed above, coupled with lower SG&A expenses and lower operating expenses. Operating income increased by $8.4 million, or 3.8%, to $228.8 million for the nine months ended January 25, 2015 from $220.4 million for the nine months ended January 26, 2014. The increase was primarily driven by the benefit from net sales discussed above, partially offset by higher marketing spending to support new products.

Interest expense

Interest expense decreased by $23.52 million, or 4039.07%, to $35.3 2 million for the three months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 from $58.8 4 million for the three months ended ~~October~~January 2726, ~~2013~~2014. Interest expense decreased by $4771.9 1 million, or 40.52%, to $70105.5 7 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 from $~~118~~176.4 8 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2726, ~~2013~~2014. These decreases were primarily driven by the pay-down of long term debt in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2014 as well as lower interest rates.

Other (income) expense, net

Other expense of $412.57 million for the three months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 was comprised primarily of ~~hedge ineffectiveness as well as~~ losses on commodity hedging contracts treated as economic hedges, largely due to the current decline in energy prices. Other income of $10.2 million for the three months ended ~~October~~January 2726, ~~2013~~2014 was comprised primarily of gains on commodity hedging contracts, partially offset by by losses on interest rate swaps, treated as economic hedges.

Other expense of $719.29 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 was comprised primarily of ~~hedge ineffectiveness as well as~~ losses on commodity hedging contracts treated as economic hedges, largely due to the current decline in energy prices, as well as hedge ineffectiveness. Other income of $9.6 8 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2726, 2014 ~~2013~~ was comprised primarily of gains on commodity hedging contracts treated as economic hedges.

Provision for income taxes

The effective tax rate for continuing operations for the three months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 was 3841.50% compared to 5635.35% for the three months ended ~~October~~January ~~27, 2013. The effective tax rate for continuing operations for the six months ended October~~ 26, 2014 ~~was 38~~.0% ~~compared to 56.2% for the six months ended October 27, 2013.~~ The change in the effective tax rates for the three ~~and~~ ~~six~~ month ~~periods~~period was primarily due to ana ~~increase~~decrease in ~~state~~ tax ~~rates which was accounted for in the prior year as well as higher tax~~ benefits ~~from~~related to manufacturing operations ~~in the current period~~.

The effective tax rate for continuing operations for the nine months ended January 25, 2015 was 39.6% compared to 46.8% for the nine months ended January 26, 2014. The change in the effective tax rates for the nine month periods was primarily due to an increase in state tax rates which was accounted for in the prior year.

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures—Adjusted EBITDA

We report our financial results in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). In this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we also provide certain non-GAAP financial measures — Adjusted EBITDA and ratio of net debt to Adjusted EBITDA. We present Adjusted EBITDA because we believe that this is an important supplemental measure relating to our financial condition since it is used in certain covenant calculations in the indenture that governs our 7.625% Senior Notes due 2019 (referred to therein as “EBITDA”) and the credit agreements relating to our term loan and revolver (referred to therein as “Consolidated EBITDA”). We present the ratio of net debt to Adjusted EBITDA because it is used internally to focus management on year-over-year changes in our leverage and we believe this information is also helpful to investors. We use Adjusted EBITDA in this leverage measure because we believe our investors are familiar with Adjusted EBITDA and that consistency in presentation of EBITDA-related measures is helpful to investors.

EBITDA is defined as income before interest expense, provision for income taxes, and depreciation and amortization. Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA, further adjusted as required by the definitions of “EBITDA” and “Consolidated EBITDA” contained in our indenture and credit agreements. Our presentation of Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of liquidity or profitability and should not be considered as an alternative to net income, operating income, net cash provided by operating activities or any other measure determined in accordance with GAAP. Additionally, Adjusted EBITDA is not intended to be a measure of cash flow for management’s discretionary use, as it does not consider debt service requirements, obligations under the monitoring agreement with our Sponsors, capital expenditures or other non-discretionary expenditures that are not deducted from the measure.

We caution investors that our presentation of Adjusted EBITDA and ratio of net debt to Adjusted EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of other companies.

The following table provides a reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA for the periods indicated, (in millions):

	~~Three Months Ended~~		Three Months Ended					~~Six Months Ended~~					Nine Months Ended		~~Trailing TwelveMonths EndedOctober 26,2014~~							Trailing TwelveMonths EndedJanuary 25, 2015
	October 26, 2014				October 27, 2013			October 26, 2014			October 27, 2013
			January 25,2015					January 26,2014					January 25,2015					January 26,2014
Reconciliation:
Operating income - Quarter ended July 28, 2013	$	-		-	$	-	$	$	-		$	~~66.2~~		-	$	-	$		66.2		$		-
Operating income - Quarter ended October 27, 2013		-		-		~~71.8~~			-			~~71.8~~		-		-			71.8				-
Operating income - Quarter ended January 26, 2014		-		-		-			-82.4			-		-		~~82.4~~			82.4				-
Operating income - Quarter ended April 27, 2014		-		-		-			-			-		-		~~34.4~~			-				34.4
Operating income - Quarter ended July 27, 2014		-		-		-			~~55.7~~-			-		55.7		~~55.7~~			-				55.7
Operating income - Quarter ended October 26, 2014		~~68.6~~		-		-			~~68.6~~-			-		68.6		~~68.6~~			-				68.6
Other income (expense), net		(4.5	)			1.2			(7.2	)		9.6				(4.7	)
Operating income - Quarter ended January 25, 2015				104.5					-					104.5					-				104.5
Adjustments to arrive at EBITDA:
Other income (expense), net				(12.7)					0.2					(19.9)					9.8				(17.6)
Depreciation and amortization expense		24.7				26.3			48.8			49.4				99.7
Adjustments to arrive at EBITDA:
Amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount (1)		(2.7	)			(6.0	)		(5.5	)		(11.1	)			(15.2	)
Depreciation and amortization expense				25.7					26.1					74.5					75.5				99.3
EBITDA		86.1				93.3			160.4			185.9				320.9
Amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount (1)				(2.8)					(5.9)					(8.3)					(17.0)				(12.1)
Non-cash charges		0.7				0.5			0.8			1.1				3.2
EBITDA				114.7					102.8					275.1					288.7				332.8
Derivative transactions(2)		4.1				(1.7	)		(12.9	)		(3.9	)			4.8
Non-cash charges				0.5					2.6					1.3					3.7				1.1
Non-cash stock based compensation		2.5				3.5			4.9			6.5				12.9
Derivative transactions(2)				7.0					4.0					(5.9)					0.1				7.8
Non-recurring (gains) losses		0.1				(4.0	)		(0.1	)		(3.8	)			3.7
Non-cash stock based compensation				2.4					5.3					7.3					11.8				10.1
Merger/acquisition-related items		1.2				1.1			1.5			8.7				6.0
Non-recurring (gains) losses				(0.1)					0.7					(0.2)					(3.1)				2.9
Disposed business reclassification(3)		-				9.2			-			18.6				9.9
Merger/acquisition-related items				2.0					1.2					3.5					6.7				6.8
Business optimization charges		2.5				2.8			2.7			4.7				13.4
Disposed business reclassification(3)				-					7.5					-					29.3				2.4
Other		4.6				1.1			9.0			4.2				19.3
Business optimization charges				4.0					5.3					6.8					10.0				12.2
Adjusted EBITDA	$	101.8			$	105.8	(4)	$	166.3		$	222.0	(4)		$	394.1
Other				2.9					1.9					11.8					6.1				20.1
Net Debt(5)															$	2,544.1
Adjusted EBITDA	$			133.4			$		131.3	(4)	$			299.7			$		353.3	(4)	$		396.2
Ratio of net debt to Adjusted EBITDA																6.5	x
Net Debt(5)																							$ 2,457.6
Ratio of net debt to Adjusted EBITDA																							6.2x

⁽¹⁾	Represents adjustments to exclude amortization of debt issuance costs and debt discount reflected in depreciation and amortization because such costs are not deducted in arriving at operating income.

⁽²⁾	Represents adjustments needed to reflect only the cash impact of derivative transactions in the calculation of Adjusted EBITDA.

(3) Represents overhead costs historically allocated to the Consumer Products segment (not reflected in discontinued operations in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles). This reclassification is required to determine Adjusted EBITDA, excluding the Consumer Products Business (a disposed business as defined in our credit agreements), for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2726, ~~2013~~2014 and the trailing twelve months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015. Subsequent to the divestiture of the Consumer Products Business, such overhead costs are borne by Big Heart Pet Brands to the extent the costs are not offset by income from a transition services agreement (in place until February 2015) or reduced by cost saving initiatives.

(4) For comparability, Adjusted EBITDA for the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2726, ~~2013~~2014 has been recast to exclude the Consumer Products Business.

⁽⁵⁾	Net debt is calculated as total debt at the end of the period (including both short-term borrowings and long-term debt and excluding debt discount) less cash and cash equivalents.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our most significant cash needs relate to the production of our products. In addition, our cash is used for the repayment, including interest and fees, of our primary debt obligations (i.e., our revolver and our term loans, our senior notes and, if necessary, our letters of credit), contributions to our pension plan, expenditures for capital assets, lease payments for some of our equipment and properties and other general business purposes. We have also used cash for acquisitions, legal settlements and transformation and restructuring plans. We may from time to time consider other uses for our cash flow from operations and other sources of cash. Such uses may include, but are not limited to, future acquisitions, transformation or restructuring plans. Our primary sources of cash are typically funds we receive as payment for the products we produce and sell. We also maintain a revolving credit facility for flexibility and other general corporate purposes.

AsLiquidity ~~of October 26, 2014, we had not made any contributions to our defined benefit pension plan for fiscal 2015. We currently meet~~ and ~~plan~~Capital toResources continue to meet the minimum funding levels required under the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (the “Act”). The Act imposes certain consequences on our defined benefit plan if it does not meet the minimum funding levels. Due to uncertainties of future funding levels as well as plan financial returns, we cannot predict whether we will continue to achieve specified plan funding thresholds. We currently expect to make a contribution of approximately $8 million in fiscal 2015.

Our most significant cash needs relate to the production of our products. In addition, our cash is used for the repayment, including interest and fees, of our primary debt obligations (i.e., our term loans, our senior notes and, if necessary, our letters of credit and our revolver), contributions to our pension plan, expenditures for capital assets, lease payments for some of our equipment and properties and other general business purposes. We have also used cash for acquisitions, legal settlements and transformation and restructuring plans. We may from time to time consider other uses for our cash flow from operations and other sources of cash. Such uses may include, but are not limited to, future acquisitions, transformation or restructuring plans. Our primary sources of cash are typically funds we receive as payment for the products we produce and sell. We also maintain a revolving credit facility for flexibility and other general corporate purposes.

As of January 25, 2015, we had not made any contributions to our defined benefit pension plan for fiscal 2015. We currently meet and plan to continue to meet the minimum funding levels required under the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (the “Act”). The Act imposes certain consequences on our defined benefit plan if it does not meet the minimum funding levels. Due to uncertainties of future funding levels as well as plan financial returns, we cannot predict whether we will continue to achieve specified plan funding thresholds. As a result of the merger, as discussed in “Note 11. Subsequent Events” in our condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we are currently evaluating whether to make a contribution in fiscal 2015.

We believe that cash on hand, cash flow from operations and availability under our revolver will provide adequate funds for our working capital needs, planned capital expenditures, debt service obligations and planned pension plan contributions for at least the next 12 months.

Our debt consists of the following, as of the dates indicated, (in millions):

	October 26, 2014		April 27, 2014
	January 25,2015		April 27,2014
Long-term debt:
Term Loan Facility	$	1,~~717~~713.84	$	1,726.4
Senior Notes		900.0		900.0
		2,617.8		2,626.4
		2,613.4		2,626.4
Less unamortized discount		65.07		6.1
Less current portion		17.3		17.3
Total long-term debt	$	2,~~594~~590.54	$	2,603.0

Description of Indebtedness

Refer to the 2014 Annual Report for a summary of our indebtedness, restrictive and financial covenants and security interests which is qualified by reference to our senior secured term loan credit agreement, our senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility, our senior note indenture, and the amendments thereto, all of which are set forth as exhibits to our public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). We believe we are in compliance with all of our applicable covenants and were in compliance therewith as of ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015.

Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Agreement

We are party to a senior secured term loan credit agreement (the “Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Agreement”) with the lenders party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent, and the other agents named therein, that initially provided for a $2,700.0 million senior secured term loan B facility (with all related loan documents, and as amended from time to time, the “Term Loan Facility”). The maturity date is March 8, 2020.

Loans under the amended Term Loan Facility bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin, plus, at our option, either (i) a LIBOR rate (with a floor of 0.75%) or (ii) a base rate (with a floor of 1.75%) equal to the highest of (a) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (b) JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s “prime rate” and (c) the one-month LIBOR rate plus 1.00%. As of ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015, the applicable margin with respect to LIBOR borrowings was 2.75% and with respect to base rate borrowings was 1.75%.

The amended Term Loan Facility generally requires quarterly scheduled principal payments of 0.25% of the outstanding principal per quarter from June 30, 2014 to December 31, 2019, with any remaining principal balance due on the maturity date. Scheduled principal payments with respect to the Term Loan Facility are subject to reduction following any mandatory or voluntary prepayments on terms and conditions set forth in the Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Agreement. As of October 26, 2014, the amount of outstanding loans under the Term Loan Facility was $1,717.8 million and the blended interest rate payable was 3.50%, or 4.96% after giving effect to our interest rate swaps. See “Note 5. Derivative Financial Instruments” to our condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of our interest rate swaps.

We have the right to request an additional $500.0 million plus an additional amount of secured indebtedness under the Term Loan Facility. Lenders under this facility are under no obligation to provide any such additional loans, and any such borrowings will be subject to customary conditions precedent, including satisfaction of a prescribed leverage ratio, subject to the identification of willing lenders and other customary conditions precedent.

payments with respect to the Term Loan Facility are subject to reduction following any mandatory or voluntary prepayments on terms and conditions set forth in the Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Agreement. As of January 25, 2015, the amount of outstanding loans under the Term Loan Facility was $1,713.4 million and the blended interest rate payable was 3.50%, or 4.96% after giving effect to our interest rate swaps. See “Note 5. Derivative Financial Instruments” to our condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for a discussion of our interest rate swaps.

Senior Secured Asset-Based Revolving Credit Agreement

We maintain a revolver for flexibility and for other general corporate purposes. The related credit agreement (the “Senior Secured Asset-Based Revolving Credit Facility”) with JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the other lenders and agents parties thereto, provides for a $225.0 million facility (with all related loan documents, and as amended from time to time, the “ABL Facility”). The ABL Facility will mature, and the commitments thereunder will terminate, on March 6, 2019.

Borrowings under the ABL Facility bear interest at an initial interest rate equal to an applicable margin, plus, at our option, either (i) a LIBOR rate, or (ii) a base rate equal to the highest of (a) the federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (b) JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.’s “prime rate” and (c) the one-month LIBOR rate plus 1.00%. The applicable margin with respect to LIBOR borrowings is currently 1.50% (and may increase to 1.75% depending on average excess availability) and with respect to base rate borrowings is currently 0.50% (and may increase to 0.75% depending on average excess availability).

Availability under the ABL Facility is subject to a borrowing base. The borrowing base, determined at the time of calculation, is an amount equal to: (a) 85% of eligible accounts receivable and (b) 85% of the net orderly liquidation value of eligible inventory (provided that net orderly liquidation value cannot exceed the net book value) of the borrowers under the facility at such time, less customary reserves. As of ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015, there were no loans outstanding under the ABL Facility, the amount of letters of credit issued under the ABL Facility was $3334.47 million and the net availability under the ABL Facility was $~~180~~190.03 million.

The commitments under the ABL Facility may be increased, subject only to the consent of the new or existing lenders providing such increases, such that the aggregate principal amount of commitments does not exceed $325 million. The lenders under this facility are under no obligation to provide any such additional commitments, and any increase in commitments will be subject to customary conditions precedent. Notwithstanding any such increase in the facility size, our ability to borrow under the facility will remain limited at all times by the borrowing base (to the extent the borrowing base is less than the commitments).

All our obligations under the Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Agreement and Senior Secured Asset-Based Revolving Credit Agreement are unconditionally guaranteed by Parent and by substantially all our existing and future, direct and indirect, wholly-owned material restricted domestic subsidiaries, subject to certain exceptions.

Senior Notes Due 2019

We have $900.0 million of senior notes due February 15, 2019 with a stated interest rate of 7.625% (the “Senior Notes”). Interest on the Senior Notes is payable semi-annually on February 15 and August 15 of each year, commencing August 15, 2011. The Senior Notes are required to be fully and unconditionally guaranteed by each of our existing and future domestic restricted subsidiaries that guarantee our obligations under the Term Loan Facility and ABL Facility.

We may redeem all or a part of the Senior Notes at a premium ranging from 103.813% to 101.906% of the aggregate principal amount. Beginning on February 15, 2016, we may redeem all or a part of the Senior Notes at face value. Any redemption as described above is subject to the concurrent payment of accrued and unpaid interest, if any, upon redemption.

~~Maturities~~As a result of the anticipated merger with Smucker, as discussed in “Note 11. Subsequent Events” in our condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, on February 13, 2015, we issued a notice pursuant to the indenture governing our Senior Notes due 2019, that we intend to redeem the full aggregate principal amount outstanding of the Senior Notes as early as March 16, 2015.

As of October 26, 2014, scheduled maturities of long-term debt (representing debt under the Term Loan Facility and Senior Notes) are as follows (in millions) (1):

2015 (remainder)	$	8.7
2016		17.3
2017		17.3
2018		17.3
2019		917.3
Thereafter		1,639.9

(1) Does not reflect any excess cash flow or other principal prepayments beyond fiscal 2015 that may be required under the terms of the amended Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Agreement, as described above.

Maturities

As of January 25, 2015, scheduled maturities of long-term debt (representing debt under the Term Loan Facility and Senior Notes) are as follows (in millions)⁽¹⁾:


2015 (remainder)	$	4.3
2016		17.3
2017		17.3
2018		17.3
2019		917.3
Thereafter		1,639.9

⁽¹⁾	Does not reflect any excess cash flow or other principal prepayments beyond fiscal 2015 that may be required under the terms of the amended Senior Secured Term Loan Credit Agreement, as described above.

Cash Flow

Cash flows for all periods presented include both continuing and discontinued operations. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015, our cash and cash equivalents ~~decreased~~increased by $3943.10 million and during the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2726, ~~2013~~2014, our cash and cash equivalents decreased by $~~578~~565.61 million.

	Six Months Ended
			Nine Months Ended
	October 26, 2014				October 27, 2013
			January 25,2015					January 26,2014
	~~(in millions)~~		(in millions)
Net cash used in operating activities	$	(6.4	)		$	(263.1	)
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities	$			93.4			$		(76.7)
Net cash used in investing activities		(22.9	)			(397.1	)
Net cash (used in) investing activities				(37.3)					(413.5)
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(9.6	)			80.8
Net cash (used in) financing activities				(13.2)					(74.8)

Operating Activities

Cash ~~used~~provided inby operating activities was $693.4 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015, primarily driven by ~~the~~current ~~timing~~period net income, partially offset by funding of working capital and significant hedging payments~~, partially offset by net income~~. Cash used in operating activities was $76.7 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2726, ~~2013~~2014 and is not comparable due to the sale of the Consumer Products Business.

Investing Activities

Cash used in investing activities was $2237.9 3 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 and $~~397~~413.1 5 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2726, ~~2013~~2014. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 we used $67.06 million for investments in equity method investees. During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2726, ~~2013~~2014 we used $~~335~~334.06 million for the acquisition of Natural Balance and $14.6 million to acquire a minority equity interest in a co-packer. Capital spending was $2638.0 6 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 compared to $4764.6 5 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2726, ~~2013~~2014. Capital spending for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2726, ~~2013~~2014 is not comparable due to the sale of the Consumer ~~Products~~ Products Business.

Financing Activities

During the first ~~six~~ nine months of fiscal 2015, we made $813.60 million in payments on long-term debt. No annual excess cash flow payment will be due in fiscal 2015 for the fiscal year ended April 27, 2014.

During the first ~~six~~nine months of fiscal 2014, we borrowed ~~a net of~~ $~~155~~239.29 million in short-term borrowings, ~~primarily~~and ~~related~~repaid to $~~156~~240.29 million ofin ~~net~~short-term ~~revolver~~ borrowings, primarily as a result of incurring seasonal ~~borrowing~~borrowings for ~~operations related to~~ our former Consumer Products Business. During the first ~~six~~nine months of fiscal 2014, we made $74.5 million in payments on long-term debt representing the excess annual cash flow payment due for the fiscal year ended April 28, 2013.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

InExcept ~~August~~as ~~2014,~~set ~~the~~forth ~~Financial~~below, ~~Accounting~~there ~~Standards~~have ~~Board~~been ~~issued~~no anmaterial ~~Accounting~~developments ~~Standards Update (“ASU”) which provides guidance on determining when and how to disclose going-concern uncertainties~~ in ~~financial~~recently ~~statements.~~issued ~~The new~~ accounting ~~standard~~standards ~~requires~~potentially ~~management~~impacting toour ~~perform~~consolidated ~~interim and annual assessments of an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date the~~ financial statements ~~are~~since ~~issued.~~those ~~This~~reported ~~ASU~~in ~~is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods thereafter, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating this guidance and~~ the ~~impact~~2014 itAnnual ~~may have on our interim and annual consolidated financial statements~~Report.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Our discussion and analysis of the financial condition and results of operations are based upon our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses. On an ongoing basis, we re-evaluate our estimates, including those related to trade promotions, goodwill and intangibles, retirement benefits and retained-insurance liabilities. Estimates in the assumptions used in the valuation of our stock compensation expense are updated periodically and reflect conditions that existed at the time of each new issuance of stock awards. We base estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the book values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. For all of these estimates, we caution that future events rarely develop exactly as forecasted and, therefore, these estimates routinely require adjustment.

In January 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued an Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) which provides guidance on the elimination of the concept of extraordinary items under GAAP. This ASU is effective for annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. We are currently evaluating this guidance and the impact it may have on its interim and annual consolidated financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued an ASU which provides consolidation guidance and changes the way reporting enterprises evaluate consolidation for limited partnerships, investment companies and similar entities, as well as variable interest entities. The ASU is effective for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. We are currently evaluating this guidance and the impact it may have on our interim and annual consolidated financial statements.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

Management has discussed the selection of critical accounting policies and estimates with the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, and the Audit Committee has reviewed our disclosure relating to critical accounting policies and estimates in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Our significant accounting policies are described in “Note 2. Significant Accounting Policies” to our consolidated financial statements in our 2014 Annual Report. The following is a summary of the more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our financial statements:

Trade Promotions

Trade promotions are an important component of the sales and marketing of our products and are critical to the support of our business. Trade spending includes amounts paid to encourage retailers to offer temporary price reductions for the sale of our products to consumers, to advertise our products in their circulars, to obtain favorable display positions in their stores, and to obtain shelf space. We accrue for trade promotions, primarily at the time products are sold to customers, by reducing sales and recording a corresponding accrued liability. The amount we accrue is based on an estimate of the level of performance of the trade promotion, which is dependent upon factors such as historical trends with similar promotions, expectations regarding customer and consumer participation, and sales and payment trends with similar previously offered programs. Our original estimated costs of trade promotions are reasonably likely to change in the future as a result of changes in trends with regard to customer and consumer participation, particularly for new programs and for programs related to the introduction of new products. We perform monthly evaluations of our outstanding trade promotions; making adjustments, where appropriate, to reflect changes in our estimates. The ultimate cost of a trade promotion program is dependent on the relative success of the events and the actions and level of deductions taken by our customers for amounts they consider due to them. Final determination of the permissible trade promotion amounts due to a customer generally may take up to 18 months from the product shipment date. Our evaluations during the ~~three~~nine ~~and six~~ months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 resulted in a net reduction to the trade ~~promotion~~ promotion liability and an increase in net sales from continuing operations of approximately $~~2.4 million and $~~6.1 million~~, respectively~~. Our evaluations during the three months ended January 25, 2015 and ~~six~~January 26, 2014 resulted in no significant adjustments to our estimates relating to trade promotion liability which related to prior year activity. Our evaluations during the nine months ended ~~October~~January 2726, ~~2013~~2014 resulted in a net reduction to the trade promotion liability and an increase in net sales from continuing operations of $1.4 million ~~for both periods~~. All of the adjustments noted above related to prior year activity and are not material to trade promotion expense for the respective periods.

Goodwill and Intangibles

We produce, distribute and market products under many different brand names (also referred to as trademarks). During an acquisition, the purchase price is allocated to identifiable assets and liabilities, including brand names and other intangibles, based on estimated fair value, with any remaining purchase price recorded as goodwill.

We have evaluated our capitalized brand names and determined that some have lives that generally range from 5 to 22 years (“Amortizing Brands”) and others have indefinite lives (“Non-Amortizing Brands”). Non-Amortizing Brands typically have significant market share and a history of strong earnings and cash flow, which we expect to continue into the foreseeable future.

Amortizing Brands and customer relationships are amortized over their estimated lives. We review the asset groups containing Amortizing Brands and customer relationships (including related tangible assets) for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the book value of an asset group may not be recoverable. An asset or asset group is considered impaired if its book value exceeds the undiscounted future net cash flow the asset or asset group is expected to generate. If an asset or asset group is considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the book value of the asset exceeds its fair value. Non-Amortizing Brands and goodwill are not amortized, but are instead tested for impairment at least annually. Our annual impairment tests occur during the fourth quarter of our fiscal year. Non-Amortizing Brands are considered impaired if the book value exceeds the estimated fair value. The goodwill impairment test is a two-step process. Initially, we compare the book value of net assets to the fair value of the reporting unit that has goodwill assigned to it. If the fair value is determined to be less than the book value, a second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment.

The estimated fair value of our Non-Amortizing Brands is determined using the relief from royalty method, which is based upon the estimated rent or royalty we would pay for the use of a brand name if we did not own it. For goodwill, the estimated fair value of a reporting unit is determined using the income approach, which is based on the cash flows that the unit is expected to generate over its remaining life, and the market approach, which is based on market multiples of similar businesses. Our reporting unit is the same as our operating segment—Pet Products—reflecting the way that we manage our business. Annually, we engage third-party valuation experts to assist in this process. Considerable management judgment is necessary in estimating future cash flows, market interest rates, discount rates and other factors affecting the valuation of goodwill and intangibles, including the operating and macroeconomic factors that may affect them. We use historical financial information, internal plans and projections, and industry information in making such estimates.

We did not recognize any impairment charges for our goodwill, Amortizing Brands, customer relationships or Non-Amortizing Brands during the three and nine months ended January 25, 2015 and January 26, 2014. As of January 25, 2015, we had $2,113.4 million of goodwill, $1,389.9 million of Non-Amortizing Brands, $27.2 million of Amortizing Brands, net of amortization and $702.7 million of customer relationships, net of amortization. The Meow Mix and Milk-Bone brands together comprise approximately 55% of Non-Amortizing Brands.

~~Table~~We have not identified any events that lead us to believe that goodwill or Non-Amortizing brands are impaired as of ~~Contents~~January 25, 2015. In our fiscal 2014 impairment test, fair value exceeded the book value of net assets by approximately 35%. Additionally, the fair value of our Non-Amortizing Brands each exceeded the book value by at least 10%, except for one brand representing 22% of our Non-Amortizing Brands for which fair value exceeded book value by approximately 3%. Our forecasts utilized in our fiscal 2014 impairment test assume, among other things, that we will achieve sales growth by successfully executing new product innovation supported by broad consumer messaging campaigns (including various forms of advertising, media and shopper marketing) which will improve category trends, enhance our pricing power, improve our share performance and facilitate further new product innovation. If these initiatives do not achieve the desired results, future impairment losses may occur.

We did not recognize any impairment charges for our goodwill, Amortizing Brands, customer relationships or Non-Amortizing Brands during the three and six months ended October 26, 2014 and October 27, 2013. As of October 26, 2014, we had $2,113.4 million of goodwill, $1,389.9 million of Non-Amortizing Brands, $27.9 million of Amortizing Brands, net of amortization and $713.8 million of customer relationships, net of amortization. The Meow Mix and Milk-Bone brands together comprise approximately 55% of Non-Amortizing Brands.

We have not identified any events that lead us to believe that goodwill or Non-Amortizing brands are impaired as of October 26, 2014. In our fiscal 2014 impairment test, fair value exceeded the book value of net assets by approximately 35%. Additionally, the fair value of our Non-Amortizing Brands each exceeded the book value by at least 10%, except for one brand representing 22% of our Non-Amortizing Brands for which fair value exceeded book value by approximately 3%. Our forecasts utilized in our fiscal 2014 impairment test assume, among other things, that we will achieve sales growth by successfully executing new product innovation supported by broad consumer messaging campaigns (including various forms of advertising, media and shopper marketing) which will improve category trends, enhance our pricing power, improve our share performance and facilitate further new product innovation. If these initiatives do not achieve the desired results, future impairment losses may occur.

Stock Compensation Expense

We believe an effective way to align the interests of certain employees with those of our equity stakeholders are through employee stock-based incentives. Stock options are stock-based incentives in which employees benefit to the extent that the price for the stock underlying the option exceeds the strike price of the stock option before expiration. A stock option is the right to purchase a share of common stock at a predetermined exercise price. Restricted stock-based incentives are incentives in which employees receive the right to own shares of common stock and do not require the employee to pay an exercise price. Restricted stock-based incentives include restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance share units and performance accelerated restricted stock units. We follow the fair value method of accounting for stock compensation expense, under which employee stock option grants and other stock-based compensation are expensed over the vesting period, based on the fair value at the time the stock option is granted.

Parent has issued to certain of our executive officers and other employees service-based stock options and performance-based stock options and restricted common stock. Service-based stock options and performance-based stock options generally vest over a four or five year period and the term may not be more than ten-years from the date of its grant. Performance-based stock options vest only if certain pre-determined performance criteria are met. Certain shares of restricted common stock vest in equal annual installments over a three-year period. We measure stock compensation expense at the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. This model estimates the fair value of the options based on a number of assumptions, such as expected option life, interest rates, the current fair market value and expected volatility of common stock and expected dividends.

~~Valuation~~27 of stock options. The fair value of service-based stock options granted during the six months ended October 26, 2014 was $4.7 million. The fair value of performance-based stock options granted during the six months ended October 26, 2014 was $2.4 million. The following table presents the weighted-average valuation assumptions used for the recognition of stock compensation expense for all stock options granted during the six months ended October 26, 2014:

Expected life (in years)		5.9
Expected volatility		45.0	%
Risk-free interest rate		1.03	%
Dividend yield		0.0	%
Weighted average exercise price	$	6.65
Weighted average option value	$	2.87

As a result of the anticipated merger with Smucker, as discussed in “Note 11. Subsequent Events” in our condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we will recognize stock compensation expense related to the accelerated vesting of restricted common stock and stock options in the consolidated statement of operations upon closing of the merger as the merger constitutes a change in control transaction.

Valuation of stock options. The fair value of service-based stock options granted during the nine months ended January 25, 2015 was $4.7 million. The fair value of performance-based stock options granted during the nine months ended January 25, 2015 was $2.4 million. The following table presents the weighted-average valuation assumptions used for the recognition of stock compensation expense for all stock options granted during the nine months ended January 25, 2015:


Expected life (in years)			5.9
Expected volatility			45.0%
Risk-free interest rate			1.03%
Dividend yield			0.0%
Weighted average exercise price			$6.65
Weighted average option value			$2.87

Valuation of Restricted Common Stock. The fair value of restricted common stock is calculated by multiplying the price of Parent’s common stock on the date of grant by the number of shares.

Retirement Benefits

We sponsor a qualified defined benefit pension plan (“pension benefits” or “pension plan”) and several other unfunded retirement benefit plans (“other benefits”) providing certain medical, dental and life insurance benefits to eligible retired, salaried, non-union hourly and union employees. We also sponsor defined contribution plans and multi-employer plans for our eligible employees. The amount of pension benefits eligible retirees receive is based on their earnings and age and the amount of other benefits retirees receive are based on meeting certain age and service requirements at retirement. Generally, other benefits are subject to plan maximums, such that we and retirees both share in the cost of these benefits.

Our Assumptions

We utilize third-party actuaries to assist us in calculating the expense and liabilities related to pension benefits and other benefits. Pension benefits and other benefits which are expected to be paid are expensed over the employees’ expected service period. The actuaries measure our annual pension benefits and other benefits expense by relying on certain assumptions made by us. Such assumptions include:

•

The discount rate used to determine projected benefit obligation and net periodic benefit cost (pension benefits and other benefits);

•

The expected long-term rate of return on assets (pension benefits);

•

The rate of increase in compensation levels (pension benefits); and

•

Other factors including employee turnover, retirement age, mortality and health care cost trend rates.

These assumptions reflect our historical experience and our best judgment regarding future expectations. The assumptions, the plan assets and the plan obligations are used to measure our annual pension benefits and other benefits expense.

Since the pension benefits and other benefits liabilities are measured on a discounted basis, the discount rate is a significant assumption. The discount rate was determined based on an analysis of interest rates for high-quality, long-term corporate debt at the measurement date. In order to appropriately match the bond maturities with expected future cash payments, we utilize differing bond portfolios to estimate the discount rates for pension benefits and other benefits. The discount rate used to determine the projected benefit obligation as of the balance sheet date is the rate in effect at the measurement date. The same rate is also used to determine pension benefits and other benefits expense for the following fiscal year. The long-term rate of return for the pension plan’s assets is based on our historical experience, our pension plan’s investment guidelines and our expectations for long-term rates of return. Our pension plan’s investment guidelines are established based upon an evaluation of market conditions, tolerance for risk and cash requirements for benefit payments.

~~During~~28 the three and six months ended October 26, 2014, we recognized expense for our pension plan of $1.0 million and $2.0 million, respectively, and other benefits expense of $0.0 million for both periods. Our remaining fiscal 2015 pension expense for our pension plan is currently estimated to be approximately $1.9 million. These estimates incorporate our fiscal 2015 assumptions. As a result of a December 2014 plan amendment (see “Note 11. Subsequent Events” to our condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q) our other benefits expense is currently estimated to be approximately a net credit of $1.3 million for fiscal 2015, as the net amortization gain exceeds service and interest costs. Our actual future pension and other benefit expense amounts may vary depending upon the accuracy of our original assumptions and future assumptions.

pension benefits and other benefits expense for the following fiscal year. The long-term rate of return for the pension plan’s assets is based on our historical experience, our pension plan’s investment guidelines and our expectations for long-term rates of return. Our pension plan’s investment guidelines are established based upon an evaluation of market conditions, tolerance for risk and cash requirements for benefit payments.

During the three and nine months ended January 25, 2015, we recognized expense for our pension plan of $0.9 million and $2.9 million, respectively, and a credit to other benefits expense of $(0.1) million in both periods. These estimates incorporate our fiscal 2015 assumptions. As a result of a December 2014 plan amendment (see “Note 7. Retirement Benefits” to our condensed consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q) our remaining other benefits expense is currently estimated to be approximately a net credit of $1.0 million for fiscal 2015, as the net amortization gain exceeds service and interest costs. Our actual future pension and other benefit expense amounts may vary depending upon the accuracy of our original assumptions and future assumptions.

Retained Insurance Liabilities

Our business exposes us to the risk of liabilities arising out of our operations. For example, liabilities may arise out of claims of employees, customers or other third parties for personal injury or property damage occurring in the course of our operations. We manage these risks through various insurance contracts from third-party insurance carriers. We, however, retain an insurance risk for the deductible portion of each claim. For example, the deductible under our loss-sensitive worker’s compensation insurance policy is up to $0.5 million per claim. A third-party actuary is engaged to assist us in estimating the ultimate costs of certain retained insurance risks. Actuarial determination of our estimated retained-insurance liability is based upon the following factors:

•

Losses which have been reported and incurred by us;

•

Losses which we have knowledge of but have not yet been reported to us;

•

Losses which we have no knowledge of but are projected based on historical information from both our Company and our industry; and

•

The projected costs to resolve these estimated losses.

Our estimate of retained-insurance liabilities is subject to change as new events or circumstances develop which might materially impact the ultimate cost to settle these losses. During the three and ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 and ~~October~~January 2726, ~~2013~~2014, we experienced no significant adjustments to our estimates.

2829

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We have a risk management program that was adopted with the objective of minimizing our exposure to changes in interest rates, commodity, transportation, foreign currency exchange rates and other input price exposures. We do not trade or use instruments with the objective of earning financial gains on price fluctuations alone or use instruments where there are not underlying exposures. We believe that the use of derivative instruments to manage risk is in our best interest. As of ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015, we had both cash flow and economic hedges.

During the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015, we were primarily exposed to the risk of loss resulting from adverse changes in interest rates, commodity and other input prices as well as foreign currency exchange rates.

Interest Rates: Our debt primarily consists of floating rate term loans and fixed rate notes. We maintain our floating rate revolver for flexibility and for other general corporate purposes. Interest expense on our floating rate debt is typically calculated based on a fixed spread over a reference rate, such as LIBOR (also known as the Eurodollar rate). Therefore, fluctuations in market interest rates will cause interest expense increases or decreases on a given amount of floating rate debt.

From time to time, we manage a portion of our interest rate risk related to floating rate debt by entering into interest rate swaps in which we receive floating rate payments and make fixed rate payments. We currently account for these interest rate swaps as economic hedges and gains and losses are recorded directly in earnings. On April 12, 2011, we entered into interest rate swaps with a total notional amount of $900.0 million as the fixed rate payer and effective date of September 4, 2012. The interest rate swaps fix LIBOR at 3.029% for the term of the swaps. The swaps have a maturity date of September 1, 2015.

On August 13, 2010, we entered into an interest rate swap with a notional amount of $300.0 million as the fixed rate payer and an effective date of February 1, 2011. The interest rate swaps fixed LIBOR at 1.368% for the term of the swaps and expired during fiscal 2014 on February 3, 2014.

The fair values of our interest rate swaps were recorded as current liabilities of $2316.1 7 million at ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015. The fair values of our ~~interest~~ interest rate swaps were recorded as current liabilities of $25.4 million and non-current liabilities of $9.8 million at April 27, 2014.

Assuming average floating rate term loans during the period and average revolver borrowings for the period equal to the trailing twelve months average, a hypothetical one percentage point increase in interest rates would increase interest expense by approximately $46.2 million for the ~~six~~nine months ended ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015.

Commodities: Certain commodities such as soybean meal, corn, wheat, soybean oil, diesel fuel and natural gas (collectively, “commodity contracts”) are used in the production or transportation of our products. As part of our commodity risk management activities, we use derivative financial instruments, primarily futures, swaps, options and swaptions (an option on a swap), to reduce the effect of changing prices and as a mechanism to procure the underlying commodity where applicable. These contracts may have a term of up to 36 months. We account for these commodities derivatives as either economic or cash flow hedges. Changes in the value of economic hedges are recorded directly in earnings. For cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the derivative gains and losses is deferred in equity and recognized as part of cost of products sold in the appropriate period and the ineffective portion is recognized as other (income) expense.

The fair values of our commodity contracts were recorded as ~~current~~ ~~assets of $0.1 million and~~ current liabilities of $1621.2 7 million at ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015. The fair values of our commodity contracts were recorded as current assets of $9.4 million at April 27, 2014.

The sensitivity analyses presented below (in millions) reflect potential losses of fair value resulting from hypothetical changes in market prices related to commodities. Sensitivity analyses do not consider the actions we may take to mitigate our exposure to changes, nor do they consider the effects such hypothetical adverse changes may have on overall economic activity. Actual changes in market prices may differ from hypothetical changes.

October 26, 2014

April 27, 2014

January 25,2015

April 27,2014

Effect of a hypothetical 10% change in market price:

Commodity and other contracts

~~17.9~~

15.2

~~13.4~~

13.4

29Foreign Currency: From time to time, we manage our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates by entering into forward contracts to cover a portion of our projected expenditures paid in local currency. These contracts may have a term of up to 36 months. We account for these contracts as either economic or cash flow hedges. Changes in the value of the economic hedges are

~~Foreign Currency: From time to time, we manage our exposure to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange~~ rates by entering into forward contracts to cover a portion of our projected expenditures paid in local currency. These contracts may have a term of up to 24 months. We account for these contracts as either economic or cash flow hedges. Changes in the value of the economic hedges are recorded directly in earnings. For cash flow hedges, the effective portion of derivative gains and losses is deferred in equity and recognized as part of cost of products sold in the appropriate period and the ineffective portion is recognized as other (income) expense.

As of ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015, the fair values of our foreign currency exchange contracts were recorded as current assets of $0.37 million. As of April 27, 2014, we did not have any outstanding foreign currency exchange contracts because we did not believe it was in our best interest at the time. The table below presents our foreign currency derivative contracts as of the dates indicated (in millions). All of the foreign currency derivative contracts held on ~~October~~January 2625, ~~2014~~2015 are scheduled to mature prior to the end of fiscal 2016.

	October 26, 2014				April 27, 2014
			January 25,2015					April 27,2014
Contract amount	$	~~13.4~~		6.5	$	-	$		-

A summary of the fair value and the market risk associated with a hypothetical 10% adverse change in foreign currency exchange rates on our foreign currency exchange contracts are as follows (in millions):

	October 26, 2014				April 27, 2014
			January 25,2015					April 27,2014
Fair value of foreign currency exchange contracts, net asset	$	~~0.3~~		0.7	$	~~n/a~~	$		n/a
Potential net loss in fair value of a hypothetical 10% adverse change in foreign currency exchange rates	$	~~(1.3~~	)	(0.6)	$	~~n/a~~	$		n/a

3031

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

We conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, or “Disclosure Controls,” as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This evaluation, or “Controls Evaluation” was performed under the supervision and with the participation of management, including our President and Chief Executive Officer (our “CEO”) and our Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer (our “CFO”). Disclosure Controls are controls and procedures designed to reasonably ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act, such as this quarterly report, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Disclosure Controls include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Our Disclosure Controls include some, but not all, components of our internal control over financial reporting.

Based upon the Controls Evaluation, and subject to the limitations noted in this Part I, Item 4, as a result of the material weakness in internal control over financial reporting identified as of April 27, 2014 and previously disclosed in our 2014 Annual Report, our CEO and CFO were unable to conclude that as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our Disclosure Controls were effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified by the Securities and Exchange Commission, and that material information relating to Big Heart Pet Brands and its consolidated subsidiaries is made known to management, including our CEO and CFO, particularly during the period when our periodic reports are being prepared.

Previously identified material weakness

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our financial statements would not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. As previously disclosed in our 2014 Annual Report, we determined that, as of April 27, 2014, a material weakness existed in that we had insufficient resources to effectively address our significant recent transactions. Specifically, in fiscal 2014 we experienced an acquisition, the divestiture of approximately half of our business, the formation of two joint ventures, and the modification of debt and stock options, among other things, and the related increased complexity of the business and accounting environment. Because of the lack of resources, our internal controls were not effective at preventing or detecting certain errors, primarily in accounting for significant transactions, and certain more routine controls were not consistently operating effectively.

Our remediation plan includes hiring additional technical resources, continuing to utilize expert external advisors, and strengthening planning, review and documentation processes. AsWe ofhave ~~October 26, 2014, we had~~ made progress with our remediation plan including hiring additional accounting resources to allow for more thorough supervision and review processes, and implementing formalized planning, review and documentation processes. We have also continued to use expert external advisors as appropriate. As of January 25, 2015, the additional accounting resources we have hired have been in place for several months and have now been trained, and the strengthened planning, review and documentation processes are operating effectively. However, asdue to the pending acquisition of ~~October 26~~our parent company, ~~2014~~Blue Acquisition Group, ~~our~~Inc. ~~remediation~~by ~~plan~~The ~~was~~J. ~~not~~M. Smucker ~~considered~~Company, ~~complete~~we suspended our hiring plans related to additional technical resources. The previously identified material weakness will not be considered fully remediated until the remediation is fully completed and the enhanced controls have been in place for a sufficient period of time. Management is committed to maintaining strong internal controls over financial reporting.

Despite the fact that the material weakness had not been fully remediated as of ~~October~~ January 2625, ~~2014~~2015, management believes that our condensed consolidated financial statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q fairly present in all material respects our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented and that this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the periods covered by this report.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls

Our management, including our CEO and CFO, does not expect that our Disclosure Controls or our internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within Big Heart Pet have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with associated policies or procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

3132

breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with associated policies or procedures. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Except as described above, as well as below in this paragraph, there have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) during the most recent fiscal quarter that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting.

CEO and CFO Certifications

The certifications of the CEO and the CFO required by Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the “Rule 13a-14 Certifications” are filed as Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. This Part I, Item 4 of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Rule 13a-14 Certifications for a more complete understanding of the topics presented.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

For a description of material developments in our pending legal proceedings, see “Note 9. Legal Proceedings” in our Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part I, Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, which is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including the section entitled “Item 1. Financial Statements” and the section entitled “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Securities Act of 1934. Statements that are not historical facts, including statements about our beliefs or expectations, are forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by the use of forward-looking terms such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “potential,” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terms.

Forward-looking statements are based on our plans, estimates, expectations and assumptions as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on them. A detailed discussion of the known risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results and events to differ materially from such forward-looking statements is included in the section entitled “Risk Factors” in our 2014 Annual Report. Such risks and uncertainties include matters relating to:

•

competition, including pricing and promotional spending levels by competitors;

•

reliance on co-packers;

•

contaminated ingredients;

•

allegations that our products cause injury or illness, product recalls and product liability claims and other litigation;

•

our ability to launch new products and anticipate changing pet and consumer preferences;

•

our ability to maintain or increase prices and persuade consumers to purchase our branded products versus lower-priced branded and private label offerings and shifts in consumer purchases to lower-priced or other value offerings, particularly during economic downturns;

•

cost and availability of inputs, commodities, ingredients and other raw materials, including without limitation, energy (including natural gas), fuel, packaging, grains (including corn), sugar, spices, meats, meat by-products, soybean meal, water, fats, oils and chemicals;

•33 ~~our ability to implement productivity initiatives to control or reduce costs;~~

• the loss of significant customers or a substantial reduction in orders from these customers or the financial difficulties, bankruptcy or other business disruption of any such customer;

• our debt levels and ability to service our debt and comply with covenants;

•

our ability to implement productivity initiatives to control or reduce costs;

•

the loss of significant customers or a substantial reduction in orders from these customers or the financial difficulties, bankruptcy or other business disruption of any such customer;

•

our debt levels and ability to service our debt and comply with covenants;

•

the failure of the financial institutions that are part of the syndicate of our revolving credit facility to extend credit to us;

•

logistics and other transportation-related costs;

•

hedging practices and the financial health of the counterparties to our hedging programs;

•

transformative plans;

•

strategic transaction endeavors, if any, including identification of appropriate targets and successful implementation;

•

changes in, or the failure or inability to comply with, U.S., foreign and local governmental regulations, including packaging and labeling regulations, environmental regulations and import/export regulations;

•

sufficiency and effectiveness of marketing and trade promotion programs;

•

failure of our information technology systems;

•

adverse weather conditions, natural disasters, pestilences and other natural conditions that affect inputs or otherwise disrupt operations;

•

impairments in the book value of goodwill or other intangible assets;

•

any disruption to our manufacturing or supply chain;

•

reliance on certain third parties, including third-party distribution centers or managers and our logistics provider;

•

pension costs and funding requirements;

•

negative comments posted on social media which may influence consumers’ perception of our brands;

•

protecting our intellectual property rights or intellectual property infringement or violation claims; strikes or work stoppages; and

•

the control of substantially all of our common stock by a group of private investors and conflicts of interest potentially posed by such ownership.

In addition, below are risk factors related to the proposed merger with The J. M. Smucker Company (“Smucker”):

•

completion of the merger is subject to certain conditions as discussed in the Form 8-K filed February 4, 2015 and if these conditions are not satisfied or waived, the merger will not be completed;

•

pending the closing of the merger, the Merger Agreement restricts us from engaging in certain actions without Smucker’s approval, which could prevent us from pursuing opportunities that may arise prior to closing of the merger;

•

any delay in completing, or the failure to complete, the merger could have a negative impact on our business and our relationships with our customers or suppliers;

•

the attention of our management may be directed to transaction-related considerations and may be diverted from the day-to-day operations of our business and pursuit of our strategic initiatives; and

•

we may lose management and other key employees and may have difficulty attracting, motivating and retaining executives and other key employees in light of the merger.

All forward-looking statements in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are made only as of the date of this report. We undertake no obligation, other than as required by law, to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

(a) NONE.

~~(b)~~34 ~~NONE.~~

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

x (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Smaller reporting company

~~See~~(b) ~~“Item 7~~NONE. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources” in our 2014 Annual Report for a description of the restrictions on our ability to pay dividends.

See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity and Capital Resources” in our 2014 Annual Report for a description of the restrictions on our ability to pay dividends.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

NONE.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

NONE.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

(a) NONE.

(b) NONE.

3335

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

(a) Exhibits.

Number		Description
*2.1		Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated as of February 3, 2015, by and among Blue Acquisition Group, Inc., The J. M. Smucker Company, SPF Holdings I, Inc., SPF Holdings II, LLC and, for the limited purposes set forth therein, Blue Holdings I, L.P. (filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Form 8-K filed by The J. M. Smucker Company on February 4, 2015, and incorporated herein by reference).
*31.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
*31.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
*32.1		Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
*32.2		Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
*101.INS		XBRL Instance Document
^101.INS		XBRL Instance Document
*101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
^101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
*101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
^101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
*101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
^101.DEF		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
*101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
^101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
*101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
^101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

*	Filed or furnished herewith

34^ Furnished herewith

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


BIG HEART PET BRANDS

By:		/s/ David J. West
		David J. West
		President and Chief Executive Officer; Director

By:		/s/ Larry E. Bodner
		Larry E. Bodner
		Executive Vice President,
		Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Dated: ~~December~~March 103, ~~2014~~2015

3537

Filing Compare · BIG HEART PET BRANDS